romikgosai/squad_modified_2 huggingface dataset:
Polarization is predictable from an antenna's geometry, although in some cases it is not at all obvious (such as for the quad antenna). An antenna's linear polarization is generally along the direction (as viewed from the receiving location) of the antenna's currents when such a direction can be defined. For instance, a vertical whip antenna or Wi-Fi antenna vertically oriented will transmit and receive in the vertical polarization. Antennas with horizontal elements, such as most rooftop TV antennas in the United States, are horizontally polarized (broadcast TV in the U.S. usually uses horizontal polarization). Even when the antenna system has a vertical orientation, such as an array of horizontal dipole antennas, the polarization is in the horizontal direction corresponding to the current flow. The polarization of a commercial antenna is an essential specification.

Q1: Whats predictable about an antenna's geometry?
A1: Polarization
Q2: The polarization of what antenna is essential specification?
A2: commercial antenna
Q3: Most rooftop antenna's are polarized in which direction?
A3: horizontal
Q4: What is a more complicated type of polarization from an antenna's geometry?
A4: quad antenna
Polarization is the sum of the E-plane orientations over time projected onto an imaginary plane perpendicular to the direction of motion of the radio wave. In the most general case, polarization is elliptical, meaning that the polarization of the radio waves varies over time. Two special cases are linear polarization (the ellipse collapses into a line) as we have discussed above, and circular polarization (in which the two axes of the ellipse are equal). In linear polarization the electric field of the radio wave oscillates back and forth along one direction; this can be affected by the mounting of the antenna but usually the desired direction is either horizontal or vertical polarization. In circular polarization, the electric field (and magnetic field) of the radio wave rotates at the radio frequency circularly around the axis of propagation. Circular or elliptically polarized radio waves are designated as right-handed or left-handed using the "thumb in the direction of the propagation" rule. Note that for circular polarization, optical researchers use the opposite right hand rule from the one used by radio engineers.

Q1: What are electrical fields projected on to?
A1: imaginary plane
Q2: What is the imagenary plane perpindicular to?
A2: radio wave
Q3: What is the name to describe polarization of radio waves varies over times?
A3: elliptical
Q4: How many directions does the E-plane of the radio waves oscillates back and forth?
A4: one direction
It is best for the receiving antenna to match the polarization of the transmitted wave for optimum reception. Intermediate matchings will lose some signal strength, but not as much as a complete mismatch. A circularly polarized antenna can be used to equally well match vertical or horizontal linear polarizations. Transmission from a circularly polarized antenna received by a linearly polarized antenna (or vice versa) entails a 3 dB reduction in signal-to-noise ratio as the received power has thereby been cut in half.

Q1: What is the best for an recieving antenna for optimum reception?
A1: match the polarization
Q2: What loses signal strength?
A2: Intermediate matchings
Q3: What is used to match vertical and horizontal linear polarizations?
A3: circularly polarized
Q4: A transmission can cause reduction in what?
A4: signal-to-noise ratio
Maximum power transfer requires matching the impedance of an antenna system (as seen looking into the transmission line) to the complex conjugate of the impedance of the receiver or transmitter. In the case of a transmitter, however, the desired matching impedance might not correspond to the dynamic output impedance of the transmitter as analyzed as a source impedance but rather the design value (typically 50 ohms) required for efficient and safe operation of the transmitting circuitry. The intended impedance is normally resistive but a transmitter (and some receivers) may have additional adjustments to cancel a certain amount of reactance in order to "tweak" the match. When a transmission line is used in between the antenna and the transmitter (or receiver) one generally would like an antenna system whose impedance is resistive and near the characteristic impedance of that transmission line in order to minimize the standing wave ratio (SWR) and the increase in transmission line losses it entails, in addition to supplying a good match at the transmitter or receiver itself.

Q1: What requires matching of the empedance to an antenna system?
A1: Maximum power transfer
Q2: Why would a transmitter have additional adjustments?
A2: "tweak" the match
Q3: What is SWR?
A3: standing wave ratio
Q4: What is the desired design value for transmmiting circuitry?
A4: 50 ohms
In some cases this is done in a more extreme manner, not simply to cancel a small amount of residual reactance, but to resonate an antenna whose resonance frequency is quite different from the intended frequency of operation. For instance, a "whip antenna" can be made significantly shorter than 1/4 wavelength long, for practical reasons, and then resonated using a so-called loading coil. This physically large inductor at the base of the antenna has an inductive reactance which is the opposite of the capacitative reactance that such a vertical antenna has at the desired operating frequency. The result is a pure resistance seen at feedpoint of the loading coil; unfortunately that resistance is somewhat lower than would be desired to match commercial coax.[citation needed]

Q1: What can be shorter than 1/4 wavelength long?
A1: whip antenna
Q2: What is the opposite of inductive reactance?
A2: capacitative reactance
Q3: What is at the base of the antenna?
A3: loading coil
Q4: Where is the resistance seen on the loading foil?
A4: feedpoint
So an additional problem beyond canceling the unwanted reactance is of matching the remaining resistive impedance to the characteristic impedance of the transmission line. In principle this can always be done with a transformer, however the turns ratio of a transformer is not adjustable. A general matching network with at least two adjustments can be made to correct both components of impedance. Matching networks using discrete inductors and capacitors will have losses associated with those components, and will have power restrictions when used for transmitting. Avoiding these difficulties, commercial antennas are generally designed with fixed matching elements or feeding strategies to get an approximate match to standard coax, such as 50 or 75 Ohms. Antennas based on the dipole (rather than vertical antennas) should include a balun in between the transmission line and antenna element, which may be integrated into any such matching network.

Q1: What is not adjustable when it comes to a transformer?
A1: turns ratio
Q2: How many ohms are in are in a standard coax?
A2: 50 or 75
Q3: A general matching network needs a minimum of how many adjustments to correct all components of impedance?
A3: two adjustments
Q4: What is included between the transmission line and the antenna element?
A4: balun
Q5: A balun should be integrated into what?
A5: matching network
Unlike the above antennas, traveling wave antennas are nonresonant so they have inherently broad bandwidth. They are typically wire antennas multiple wavelengths long, through which the voltage and current waves travel in one direction, instead of bouncing back and forth to form standing waves as in resonant antennas. They have linear polarization (except for the helical antenna). Unidirectional traveling wave antennas are terminated by a resistor at one end equal to the antenna's characteristic resistance, to absorb the waves from one direction. This makes them inefficient as transmitting antennas.

Q1: What antenna's are nonresonant?
A1: traveling wave antennas
Q2: How long are the wire antenna's that the voltage and current waves travel in the same direction?
A2: one direction
Q3: What are undirectional traveling wave directions terminated by?
A3: resistor
Q4: What antenna does not have linear polarization?
A4: helical antenna
Q5: What is the resistor equal to?
A5: antenna's characteristic resistance
The radiation pattern and even the driving point impedance of an antenna can be influenced by the dielectric constant and especially conductivity of nearby objects. For a terrestrial antenna, the ground is usually one such object of importance. The antenna's height above the ground, as well as the electrical properties (permittivity and conductivity) of the ground, can then be important. Also, in the particular case of a monopole antenna, the ground (or an artificial ground plane) serves as the return connection for the antenna current thus having an additional effect, particularly on the impedance seen by the feed line.

Q1: What is the radiation patter influenced by?
A1: dielectric constant
Q2: The ground is important for what antenna?
A2: terrestrial antenna
Q3: Whats another name for the ground?
A3: artificial ground plane
Q4: What does the artificial ground plane do for the antenna current?
A4: return connection
The net quality of a ground reflection depends on the topography of the surface. When the irregularities of the surface are much smaller than the wavelength, we are in the regime of specular reflection, and the receiver sees both the real antenna and an image of the antenna under the ground due to reflection. But if the ground has irregularities not small compared to the wavelength, reflections will not be coherent but shifted by random phases. With shorter wavelengths (higher frequencies), this is generally the case.

Q1: What is the net quality of the ground dependent of?
A1: topography
Q2: What is the reason for the receiver seeing both the ral antenna and image of the antenna?
A2: reflection
Q3: What frequencies is associated with shorter wavelengths?
A3: higher frequencies
Q4: When will reflections not be coherent?
A4: ground has irregularities
The phase of reflection of electromagnetic waves depends on the polarization of the incident wave. Given the larger refractive index of the ground (typically n=2) compared to air (n=1), the phase of horizontally polarized radiation is reversed upon reflection (a phase shift of  radians or 180°). On the other hand, the vertical component of the wave's electric field is reflected at grazing angles of incidence approximately in phase. These phase shifts apply as well to a ground modelled as a good electrical conductor.

Q1: What is the refractive index of the ground?
A1: n=2
Q2: When is polarized radiation reversed?
A2: reflection
Q3: What is the refractive index of air?
A3: n=1
Q4: Besides a ground, what has these phases apply well to?
A4: electrical conductor
When an electromagnetic wave strikes a plane surface such as the ground, part of the wave is transmitted into the ground and part of it is reflected, according to the Fresnel coefficients. If the ground is a very good conductor then almost all of the wave is reflected (180° out of phase), whereas a ground modeled as a (lossy) dielectric can absorb a large amount of the wave's power. The power remaining in the reflected wave, and the phase shift upon reflection, strongly depend on the wave's angle of incidence and polarization. The dielectric constant and conductivity (or simply the complex dielectric constant) is dependent on the soil type and is a function of frequency.

Q1: Who proposed this theory?
A1: Fresnel coefficients
Q2: Is the ground has a great conductor, how much of the wave will be reflected?
A2: 180° out of phase
Q3: what is reflected and transmitted into the ground when a plane surface is struck?
A3: electromagnetic wave
Q4: What depends on the polarization and waves angle?
A4: power remaining
The effective area or effective aperture of a receiving antenna expresses the portion of the power of a passing electromagnetic wave which it delivers to its terminals, expressed in terms of an equivalent area. For instance, if a radio wave passing a given location has a flux of 1 pW / m2 (10−12 watts per square meter) and an antenna has an effective area of 12 m2, then the antenna would deliver 12 pW of RF power to the receiver (30 microvolts rms at 75 ohms). Since the receiving antenna is not equally sensitive to signals received from all directions, the effective area is a function of the direction to the source.

Q1: What is the portion of something that is reached by the radio transmission called?
A1: aperture
Q2: What effects the function of signals received by an antenna?
A2: direction
Q3: What is a measure of the power of an antenna?
A3: microvolts
Q4: How much power will be delivered to the reciever if the antenna has an effective area of 12 m/2?
A4: 12 pW of RF power
The bandwidth characteristics of a resonant antenna element can be characterized according to its Q, just as one uses to characterize the sharpness of an L-C resonant circuit. However it is often assumed that there is an advantage in an antenna having a high Q. After all, Q is short for "quality factor" and a low Q typically signifies excessive loss (due to unwanted resistance) in a resonant L-C circuit. However this understanding does not apply to resonant antennas where the resistance involved is the radiation resistance, a desired quantity which removes energy from the resonant element in order to radiate it (the purpose of an antenna, after all!). The Q is a measure of the ratio of reactance to resistance, so with a fixed radiation resistance (an element's radiation resistance is almost independent of its diameter) a greater reactance off-resonance corresponds to the poorer bandwidth of a very thin conductor. The Q of such a narrowband antenna can be as high as 15. On the other hand, a thick element presents less reactance at an off-resonant frequency, and consequently a Q as low as 5. These two antennas will perform equivalently at the resonant frequency, but the second antenna will perform over a bandwidth 3 times as wide as the "hi-Q" antenna consisting of a thin conductor.

Q1: The properties of a usable radio frequency can be called its?
A1: Q
Q2: What is a measure of the comparison between reactance and resistance?
A2: Q
Q3: What is the largest Q that could be achieved with a slimmer band antenna?
A3: 15
Q4: What type of element would be used to encounter less reactance?
A4: thick
For example, at 30 MHz (10 m wavelength) a true resonant 1⁄4-wavelength monopole would be almost 2.5 meters long, and using an antenna only 1.5 meters tall would require the addition of a loading coil. Then it may be said that the coil has lengthened the antenna to achieve an electrical length of 2.5 meters. However, the resulting resistive impedance achieved will be quite a bit lower than the impedance of a resonant monopole, likely requiring further impedance matching. In addition to a lower radiation resistance, the reactance becomes higher as the antenna size is reduced, and the resonant circuit formed by the antenna and the tuning coil has a Q factor that rises and eventually causes the bandwidth of the antenna to be inadequate for the signal being transmitted. This is the major factor that sets the size of antennas at 1 MHz and lower frequencies.

Q1: What can be added to allow for an antenna shorter than the needed height to produce desired results?
A1: loading coil
Q2: How would the resistive impedance from this scenario compare to if the antenna was the proper height?
A2: lower
Q3: The coil has lengthed the antenna to reach how much length electrically?
A3: 2.5 meters
Q4: What is the major thing that sets the size of antennas at lower frequencies?
A4: reactance
Consider a half-wave dipole designed to work with signals 1 m wavelength, meaning the antenna would be approximately 50 cm across. If the element has a length-to-diameter ratio of 1000, it will have an inherent resistance of about 63 ohms. Using the appropriate transmission wire or balun, we match that resistance to ensure minimum signal loss. Feeding that antenna with a current of 1 ampere will require 63 volts of RF, and the antenna will radiate 63 watts (ignoring losses) of radio frequency power. Now consider the case when the antenna is fed a signal with a wavelength of 1.25 m; in this case the reflected current would arrive at the feed out-of-phase with the signal, causing the net current to drop while the voltage remains the same. Electrically this appears to be a very high impedance. The antenna and transmission line no longer have the same impedance, and the signal will be reflected back into the antenna, reducing output. This could be addressed by changing the matching system between the antenna and transmission line, but that solution only works well at the new design frequency.

Q1: How big would an antenna be used to with with one m wavelengths?
A1: 50 cm
Q2: How could the rection of output be adressed by?
A2: changing the matching system
Q3:  What unit is used to measure current?
A3: ampere
Q4: What effect occurs when the signal is reflected back into the antenna?
A4: reducing output
Recall that a current will reflect when there are changes in the electrical properties of the material. In order to efficiently send the signal into the transmission line, it is important that the transmission line has the same impedance as the elements, otherwise some of the signal will be reflected back into the antenna. This leads to the concept of impedance matching, the design of the overall system of antenna and transmission line so the impedance is as close as possible, thereby reducing these losses. Impedance matching between antennas and transmission lines is commonly handled through the use of a balun, although other solutions are also used in certain roles. An important measure of this basic concept is the standing wave ratio, which measures the magnitude of the reflected signal.

Q1: What sort of changes in material would a current reflect?
A1: electrical
Q2:  What must match between the transmission line and elements?
A2: impedance
Q3: What technique is used to prevent unintentional decrease in signal?
A3: Impedance matching
Q4: How is this process usually used for transmission lines and antennas?
A4: balun
An electromagnetic wave refractor in some aperture antennas is a component which due to its shape and position functions to selectively delay or advance portions of the electromagnetic wavefront passing through it. The refractor alters the spatial characteristics of the wave on one side relative to the other side. It can, for instance, bring the wave to a focus or alter the wave front in other ways, generally in order to maximize the directivity of the antenna system. This is the radio equivalent of an optical lens.

Q1: What is used to allow one to control the function of wave fronts moving through an antenna?
A1: selectively delay
Q2: What changes the structuak traits of a wave on either side?
A2: refractor
Q3: What is the main purpose of a refractor?
A3: spatial characteristics
Q4: A refractor can be compared to what type of viewing?
A4: optical lens
The actual antenna which is transmitting the original wave then also may receive a strong signal from its own image from the ground. This will induce an additional current in the antenna element, changing the current at the feedpoint for a given feedpoint voltage. Thus the antenna's impedance, given by the ratio of feedpoint voltage to current, is altered due to the antenna's proximity to the ground. This can be quite a significant effect when the antenna is within a wavelength or two of the ground. But as the antenna height is increased, the reduced power of the reflected wave (due to the inverse square law) allows the antenna to approach its asymptotic feedpoint impedance given by theory. At lower heights, the effect on the antenna's impedance is very sensitive to the exact distance from the ground, as this affects the phase of the reflected wave relative to the currents in the antenna. Changing the antenna's height by a quarter wavelength, then changes the phase of the reflection by 180°, with a completely different effect on the antenna's impedance.

Q1: What can receive a stron signal by transmitting an original wave?
A1: actual antenna
Q2: Where will the additional current be induced?
A2: antenna element
Q3: What is altered because of the proximity to the ground?
A3: antenna's impedance
Q4: what happens to the reflected wave which allows the antenna to reach its asympotic feedpoint impedance?
A4: reduced power
For horizontal propagation between transmitting and receiving antennas situated near the ground reasonably far from each other, the distances traveled by tne direct and reflected rays are nearly the same. There is almost no relative phase shift. If the emission is polarized vertically, the two fields (direct and reflected) add and there is maximum of received signal. If the signal is polarized horizontally, the two signals subtract and the received signal is largely cancelled. The vertical plane radiation patterns are shown in the image at right. With vertical polarization there is always a maximum for θ=0, horizontal propagation (left pattern). For horizontal polarization, there is cancellation at that angle. Note that the above formulae and these plots assume the ground as a perfect conductor. These plots of the radiation pattern correspond to a distance between the antenna and its image of 2.5λ. As the antenna height is increased, the number of lobes increases as well.

Q1: What is between recieving and transmitting antenna's?
A1: horizontal propagation
Q2: When is the emission at maximized recieved signal?
A2: polarized vertically
Q3: Where is the radiation patterns in the vertical plane shown?
A3: image at right
Q4: What is also increased along with the antenna's height?
A4: lobes
On the other hand, classical (analog) television transmissions are usually horizontally polarized, because in urban areas buildings can reflect the electromagnetic waves and create ghost images due to multipath propagation. Using horizontal polarization, ghosting is reduced because the amount of reflection of electromagnetic waves in the p polarization (horizontal polarization off the side of a building) is generally less than s (vertical, in this case) polarization. Vertically polarized analog television has nevertheless been used in some rural areas. In digital terrestrial television such reflections are less problematic, due to robustness of binary transmissions and error correction.

Q1: What is another name for classical television transmissions?
A1: analog
Q2: Buildings can create ghost images because of what?
A2: multipath propagation
Q3: When is ghosting reduced?
A3: horizontal polarization
Q4: What cause less problems in digital terrestrial television?
A4: Vertically polarized analog television
Current circulating in one antenna generally induces a voltage across the feedpoint of nearby antennas or antenna elements. The mathematics presented below are useful in analyzing the electrical behaviour of antenna arrays, where the properties of the individual array elements (such as half wave dipoles) are already known. If those elements were widely separated and driven in a certain amplitude and phase, then each would act independently as that element is known to. However, because of the mutual interaction between their electric and magnetic fields due to proximity, the currents in each element are not simply a function of the applied voltage (according to its driving point impedance), but depend on the currents in the other nearby elements. Note that this now is a near field phenomenon which could not be properly accounted for using the Friis transmission equation for instance.

Q1: Where are the indiviual array elements known?
A1: antenna arrays
Q2: What induces a feedpoint to antennas nearby?
A2: Current circulating
Q3: What are the mathmatic useful towards?
A3: electrical behaviour
Q4: What cause mutual interactions between the elements electric and magnetic fields?
A4: proximity