Why on earth would she trouble herself to contest something that holds no value to her.  PERS is treating her sweet.  Who cares about a license to do something she doesn't do.  If she admitted guilt, that would be another thing.  Just think basic human motivation.  She has no reason to waste her time or spend lots of money on lawyers (which are required by their secret knowledge of procedure, etc.).  $200-$250/hour to contest a license revocation that she no longer uses?  Think man.  Put yourself in her shoes.  Also, there is no defense to a claim from 35 years ago of this nature.  It will remain the words of two people.  Thus ultimately the decision will fall on who is more victim like.  Yuck.

Labels: moderation: safe