To all those complaining about this rubbish being published, why don't you rather refute the claims made by this zupta acolyte in the comments section, instead of wasting your breath complaining that the DM published something you don't like?

Freedom of the press works both ways, and we should always be willing to entertain views that are different from ours (even when blatant propaganda), because we should expect others to do the same with our views. However, when someone writes utter balderdash like this, we should argue them under the table, rather than complaining that we don't like what they've said (and in an opinion piece, at that!)

I, for one, was about to point out how stupid his claims of 'regime change' were, but I see another commenter below already got there.

Labels: moderation: insult