If the owner of a gun is careless, we have a civil court (where the burden of proof is a preponderance of evidence) where they can be held accountable for their actions. If they are criminally negligent we have criminal courts where the evidence of their alleged crime is presented and they are judged by a jury of their peers. To pretend that there isn't an existing means of holding gun owners accountable for careless or negligent actions is simply not true regardless of how many times the lie is repeated.

Labels: moderation: safe