I certainly don't know much about Bowlen as an owner and wouldn't argue to his involvement in the leagues success....however Jerry has been front and center in both turning the Cowboys into the most valued franchise in all of sports as well as generating billions in revenue for the league.  My point was more in reference to the authors belief that his induction had anything to do with wins or losses when comparing the two owners.  Jerry was inducted almost entirely based on his business influence over the league, everyone knows he was a terrible GM for a solid 2 decades.  Regardless he earned that induction, stating Bowlen is more deserving should be a case for his future induction as opposed to a basis for belittling someone else's accomplishments.

Labels: moderation: safe