Nancy,

Thank you for suggesting how my day might be "saved," but I and the majority of Democrats (big "D") who voted directly or through caucuses don't need you or anyone else to usurp the democratic (little "d") process we followed to choose our nominee.

In fact, it's quite presumptuous of you to think that "a overwhelming majority of registered voters would be greatly relieved to see a lineup of more conventional candidates," when most "D's" actually voted for Hillary, despite an attractive alternative; _I'm thinking of Martin O'Malley._

Whom exactly would you suggest as a "more conventional candidate" than Hillary Clinton? Certainly not the closest runner-up, Bernie Sanders.

From my perspective, and perhaps a majority of voters, I'm relieved that Sanders isn't the candidate because a) I think Trump would have chewed him to pieces when the full battle was engaged (I may be wrong, we'll never know); and b) I doubt Sanders would be as able to combat the Republican nihilist machine.

Labels: moderation: safe