Disregarding the fact that it's a really biased article (judgemental side of the author really seeping through the whole thing), it is barely based on any facts. Didn't even argue whether it should stay or not. Author didn't bother to investigate on mccandless... a whole paragragh of questions that could have been easily researched (or maybe read the short book about his journey?). Just to clarify the most disrespecting part of the whole thing : he didn't go there to die. He very much wanted to live, and he quickly realized his mistakes. Also, he "disposed" his 25k by giving it to charity. Maybe his journey attracts foolish people, but you are the fool for not having your facts straight before writing this article.

Labels: moderation: toxicity, insult