How can rail continue when the Kiewit yard that built the concrete sections has been disassembled. All the equipment is gone. With ten miles left, where are the new sections going to be built? Seems like the contractor for the next section of rail will have to build a new yard. Which would only mean MORE money. Anderson said "killing the project would cost money". Does he mean then that completing it won't? What a joker. Kill the project, spend the money to make it go away, then rail costs will END. Complete the project, then taxpayers are tethered to this money pit FOREVER. With a cost to far EXCEED the cost to kill it.

Labels: moderation: safe