Prompt: Individuals should not be allowed to carry guns as it increases the crime and violence in the society. Ċ To what extent do you agree or disagree? Ċ Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

As gun violence has been increasing in society for the last few decades, it is often argued that revolver ownership should not be allowed to common people. I support this view to a large extent since this may prevent getting rifles into the wrong hands. This essay will support my views and give a proper conclusion at the end. Ċ The one main reasons are if guns were used by mentally challenged or criminals, the repercussions would be tremendous. Because of the ownership, this allows the owner to use firearms for self -defence. However, currently, the opposite is true: there are many gun violence incidents in the USA, where keeping a licensed rifle is very normal, for example. Unfortunately, many culprits fire revolvers against innocents in order to escape from crime scenes. Ċ Secondly, freedom of rifle ownership is outdated when mankind at risk of being attacked. In other words, rarely do we see a country with a free gun policy that is peaceful, and many sociologists have been requesting to the world leaders to stop issuing weapons' licenses to citizens. Although it may argue that the piece of equipment also uses for entertainment, mostly this may not be the case. To illustrate this, even young school children shoot at their fellow classmates with their parents’ pistols, so the depth of the issue is evident. Ċ In conclusion, I firmly support prohibiting access to handguns to citizens as it is essential to save the lives of innocent people. It is predicted that if possession of deadly weapons did not control, it would kill thousands of humans.