Prompt: Creative artists should be given the freedom to express their own ideas in whichever they wish. However, there are should be restrictions on what they do. To what extend do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

Freedom in showing creation is the right for every creative artist. Certainly, government has to control it. Personally, I agree with this opinion because the government have right to manage their people. Ċ However, sometimes, the government pressed the media and artist too much. Moreover, they try to shut them up. This is usually, done by politicians that stand in main position. This obligation is taken to cover the bad attitude that they do behind the scene. This can be included to violation in giving opinion. This will cause skepticism in politics. If this happens, people in a country will not be aware to their country situation. Ċ In other hands, a freedom without limitation is very dangerous. This can cause some crime activities. One example is when a few of comedians-In indonesia, today, make some satire jokes that address to corrupt person, sometimes, they talk too much. Furthermore, they judge the person that relate to corruption cases, whereas the case is still running in the court and still does not proven yet. If this happens, the comedian can be demanded for defamation case. Here, the role of government is needed to do surveillance and make restrictions in expressing idea. For all people know, the rule is made to limit the person's right, so that his right will never hurt another's right. Then, everybody can live in peaceful life. Ċ In conclusion, limitation idea is useful to shape good situation. But, the limitation is has to be made in good proportion. Therefore, everyone (including artist) can express his feeling without break another one's right.