Prompt: experiments of animals - pros and cons Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products. Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer, while others are in favour of them because of their benefits to humanity.  Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

In recent decades, animal testing remains a highly controversial issue, generating a great deal of public debate. We are testing on the animal in order to invent new medicines or vaccines and test the safety of those products. I would have supported a limited amount of animal experimentation for the development of medicines. Ċ On the one hand, thank for testing technique so that a thousand people all over the world can be saved and against a lot of dangerous deceases. Rat and monkey have similar biology structure with a human that professors choose to test on them. One result of this is that it can open a new age with the revolution of medicines. Furthermore, experiments can decrease the number of people who were died each year. I believed that animal experiments can decrease the quality of the health care system. Ċ On the other hand, opponents of animal testing often claimed that it is cruel and inhumanity. Firstly, it makes an animal suffer repetitive motion injuries. For instants, professors have to put a chemical on the animal's body every day for searching the effect of that medical or vaccine. As a result, the animal was died devastatingly and may on the brink of extinction. All humans are created equal but do they care about animal equally. Otherwise, I believed that it has a lot of ways to test the safety of other products which can replace the animal. Ċ Taking into consideration, it brings a lot of benefits for human although it is wrong in the moral ground and harmful for animal. Above all, with the development, I believed that it has a different way for professors to testing