Prompt: It is generally believe that some people are born with certain talents, for instance for sport or music, and other are not. However, it is sometimes claimed that any child can be taught to become a good sport person or musician. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

People have different views about the relations between nature and training abilities. From my personal perspective, I believe that children should be properly equipped and own inborn talents as an example sport, art or music. Ċ On the one hand, having a natural talent of each child is a special gift. It is undeniable that the innate abilities can not be taught by the great teachers or gainedly doing practice frequently. It, therefore, highlights a great deal of difference between one child and another child in order to become a excellent sport player or an musical prodigy. A typical example is that Mozart was known as a gifted musican in the history of the music world when he was young. Ċ Many people, on the other hand, argue that all babies can be educated to achieve distinguished skills even though they would spent much of their time practicing. For instance, my cousin was guied to play badminton by his teacher with hard-working improvement despite having no natural aptitude for playing badminton, as a result of gaining plenty of rewards.It is a patent fact that smashing musicians or illustrious artistis as well as international sport stars would probably succeed if having both training and innate talent. Without the innate aptitude, continuous training need be a lot of time and perseverance and without the training, children would not learn how to develop their talents. Ċ In conclution, there is a trong connection between education and inborn gift. It seems to me that a successful person in terms of art, sport or music should be combined with both of those.