Prompt: some people think that school graduates should travel or work for a period of time instead of going directly to study at university. discuss the advantages and disadvantages of both approaches

Nowadays,many changes have taken place in the theam of curriculam due to the advancements in lifestyle. it is often argued that, after finishing schooling,young people must go to do some job or a journey without directly getting into a uniersity life. in this essay i would like to listdown some advantages and disadvantages concerning the above mentioned argument. Ċ To begin with the positive out comes of students taking a break before joining unversity. Firstly, by doing some job for a short period can make a child more concious about the value of money , punctuaity and team work. this can influence postively on his/her higher studies. Going to a journey for a short span makes the person to acquire a better perspective of the world. which also improves the confidence, communication skills in them. Ċ However, there are many cons can be pointed out regarding this argument. first point is that, lagging a period of time in studies can influence negatively on the future of a child especially in the era of extreme rat race. in addition to that going for a journey at a young age alone is not a safe practice and there might be a chance for ending in big troubes such as burglary, bad peer group influence and stress. working enviroment can influence ones further studies badly. there by children loose their interest in studies.  Ċ finally, it is difficult for a teenager to endure heavy work pressure at his immature age. in conclusion, even if a child is sent to a job or travel before higher studies brings more potential. it also creates many drawbacks..so in my opinion it is better to fullfill children's academic carrier instead imposing a job or travel alone. lets hope all work better in near future.