Prompt: financial funding or donating practical products? Developing countries require international organizations' help. Some people prefer financial aid while others think practical aid and advice are better. Discuss both views and give your own opinions.

The matter in which should international organizations provide help to less advantaged areas has aroused discussion. Although financial funding can solve temporary problems, I believe donating practical products and advice can bring more benefits in the long run. Ċ Supporters of financial aid believe that it is helpful to solve the major problems in developing countries. Compared to donating countries, local councils have a deeper insight into the local economy and a better understanding of their current situation. If they are given financial support, they can develop a budget plan that allows them to tackle the most urgent issues. Ċ Those who are approval of other forms of aid and advice believe this can reduce corruption and average people in developing countries can benefit from these supports directly. While financial funding may be corrupted by greedy figures in the governments, donations, such as drugs and medical service, are more likely to be delivered to those who are in urgent need of them, since authorities have access to better products and service and they will have little interest in these donations. Ċ I would argue that providing practical aid and service can motivate these deprived countries to develop independently. Some countries have generated reliance on financial aid from other countries and they take it for granted and lack of motivation to drive economic growth through their efforts. The economy in these countries is so weak that they will soon collapse once there is no financial aid. However, if they were given valuable advice and support on developing their technology and agriculture, it is helpful to reduce their dependence on financial help and break the poverty-related malicious cycle.