Prompt: The growth of Online shopping will one day lead to all the shops in towns and cities closing. Do you agree or disagree?

It is believed that at a given time tele-purchasing will compel the closure of all bazaars throughout big cities and villages. Personally, I agree with the view owing to the fact that, eBay is faster and more convenient than in-person buying. However, it has its pitfalls. This essay will shed light on both sides of the statement and provide evidence to prove the arguments. Ċ On the one hand, online purchasing amongst cities is becoming fast and convenient. Because of swiftness, online shoppers receive products, which makes the process reliable and worthwhile. For instance, a simple item bought in Europe today takes approximately a fortnight, while if one travels to the same place, it could take a month or more. As a result, businesses are made swiftly and customers benefited. Moreover, this is the overriding reason for the increase in online shopping throughout remote communities these days. Ċ On the other hand, internet shopping is the source of customers' deceiving. In other words, the growing number of websites soars a plethora of fakes also, misleading the overwhelming majority of online shoppers. 60% of hoodwinked clients were reported last year by the Guardian Newspaper at an independent inquiry made to 5000 individuals. Hence, a myriad of clients prefers in-person purchasing rather than through the internet. Furthermore, most conservationists businessmen abandoned online negotiation these days due to deceit. Ċ In conclusion, notwithstanding some drawbacks, which internet purchasing comes with, it is growing fast and it is becoming reliable and safe, enough reasons to threaten other forms of negotiations. Therefore, I agree with the view. I would go as far as to say, ruling power should protect internet vendors and clients.