Prompt: It's generally believed that success in fields such as art and sport can only be achieved if a person has natural talent. However, it's sometimes claimed that any child can be taught to become a good sports person or artist.  Discuss both these views and give your opinion.  Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

It is argued that traning is required for a person to become a star in a genre of sport or art. Nevertheless, there have been such typical persons who have achived a lot by virtue of their own natural talent. Let me discuss both the points of view of this issue in the essay before coming to my ultimate standpoint. Ċ In the first place, innate aptitude definitively contributes a large proportion in the success of many people. It is natural talent of which many geniuses have taken advantages and obtained various success. A good illustration for this is one of the best football players on the world - Messi. He is claimed to have a fascinating talent in playing football when he was a child, and there is no doubt that this kind of skill has noticeably assisted him to be an extraodinary player and to earn a lot of money. Not only football but also other fields such as art emerge similar geniuses, and they prove that natural talent plays such crucial role in success. Ċ On the other hand, accomplishment is not obtainable without intense training and good instruction. One's talent will be likely to disappear if it is not regconized and reinforced. Had it not been for his coaches, Messi would have never achive such reputation and honour. Talent requires a lot of training and striving in order to be completely perfect. Ċ All thing considered, there is no doubt that innate talent is a great advantage for one person to gain success. Nevertheless, a variety of additional elements are essential such as being well taught to make a talent become perfect.