Prompt: It is not necessary for children to go to school because far more information is accessible on the Internet. Do you agree or disagree?

Distance education breaks the geographical constraint between learners and teachers, offering a band new way for all citizens, particularly in rural area. Thus some parents suggest that traditional school education should be replaced as children could acquire more information through Internet. Ċ Indeed, remote learning brings a couple of benefits. Instead of riding bike or taking bus to school, children save a great amount of time on the road. From the perspective of parents, they are able to devote themselves to working rather than worry about the security of their child. Further, none of teachers have capability to master various kinds of discipline knowledge. In other words, less information is taught by teachers compared with the powerful Internet. Ċ Those who advocated the new education approach, however, fails to consider the fact that distinguishing the right from wrong is a tough task for the young. Although a sea of information is provided, it is a pity that most of the information has not been proved by the authority. Children may misunderstand if lacking of proper guidance given by professional teachers. In addition, school adopts systematic way to teach children physically and psychologically. Loads of activities are held in order to cultivate the skills in communication and cooperation, which helps students access to society smoothly and gain a promising future as well. Ċ Compared with home study through Internet, traditional education still shines with irreplaceable benefits. The best way for children's education, I believe, should combine the two ways together. Mainly focus on the knowledge the teacher taught, grasping more extended information as supplement if children have enough time and interest.