Prompt: Should a city try to preserve its old, historic buildings or destroy them and replace them with modern buildings? Use specific reasons and examples tosupport your opinion.

A change should be done effectively if we want to progress more in the future. There is a burgeoning question in regards to changing old, historical infrastructure with modern building. There are two facets in this issue. In my opinion, the degree of modernizing a city lies on the effectiveness of a project in projecting its significance in the future. Ċ Old infrastructure should be destruct if we find any significance for this change. If the building begins to obstruct a street and causes a lot of traffic then it is prudent that we should torn down this building regardless of its significance. Moreover, most of old infrastructures have a poor fire safety and the immediate treat from the neighborhood is in question. This in turn also may give a significant reason for a building to be destroyed. Ċ However, We should not destroy them entirely just because we feel that we need to change these to a new building. Most of the historical buildings have significant values in the city development. Losing it will deprive education and appreciation of our younger generation. However, destroying an infrastructure is not a sole option for modernizing a city. Most of the technology today can aim on relocating this building to other site, which can also preserve its values. Ċ In my opinion, as we aim to develop a futuristic city we should still take account on the marvelous artifacts that we have in the past. Technological breakthroughs have made these possible for us.