fix dtype when init HF model from config
State: closed | Pull request: yes
Labels: name: Run CICD

# What does this PR do ?

Use config's default dtype, otherwise fall-back to default_dtype constructor param value.


**Collection**: [Note which collection this PR will affect]

# Changelog 
- Add specific line by line info of high level changes in this PR.

# Usage
* You can potentially add a usage example below

```python
# Add a code snippet demonstrating how to use this 
```

# GitHub Actions CI

The Jenkins CI system has been replaced by GitHub Actions self-hosted runners.

The GitHub Actions CI will run automatically when the "Run CICD" label is added to the PR.
To re-run CI remove and add the label again.
To run CI on an untrusted fork, a NeMo user with write access must first click "Approve and run".

# Before your PR is "Ready for review"
**Pre checks**:
- [ ] Make sure you read and followed [Contributor guidelines](https://github.com/NVIDIA/NeMo/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md)
- [ ] Did you write any new necessary tests?
- [ ] Did you add or update any necessary documentation?
- [ ] Does the PR affect components that are optional to install? (Ex: Numba, Pynini, Apex etc)
  - [ ] Reviewer: Does the PR have correct import guards for all optional libraries?
  
**PR Type**:
- [ ] New Feature
- [ ] Bugfix
- [ ] Documentation

If you haven't finished some of the above items you can still open "Draft" PR.


## Who can review?

Anyone in the community is free to review the PR once the checks have passed. 
[Contributor guidelines](https://github.com/NVIDIA/NeMo/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md) contains specific people who can review PRs to various areas.

# Additional Information
* Related to # (issue)


<!-- pylint-output-strict-mode-false -->

beep boop 🤖: 🙏 The following files have warnings. In case you are familiar with these, please try helping us to improve the code base.

---

Your code was analyzed with PyLint. The following annotations have been identified:

```
************* Module nemo.collections.llm.gpt.model.hf_auto_model_for_causal_lm
nemo/collections/llm/gpt/model/hf_auto_model_for_causal_lm.py:26:0: C0116: Missing function or method docstring (missing-function-docstring)
nemo/collections/llm/gpt/model/hf_auto_model_for_causal_lm.py:34:0: C0115: Missing class docstring (missing-class-docstring)
nemo/collections/llm/gpt/model/hf_auto_model_for_causal_lm.py:60:4: C0116: Missing function or method docstring (missing-function-docstring)
nemo/collections/llm/gpt/model/hf_auto_model_for_causal_lm.py:71:4: C0116: Missing function or method docstring (missing-function-docstring)
nemo/collections/llm/gpt/model/hf_auto_model_for_causal_lm.py:74:4: C0116: Missing function or method docstring (missing-function-docstring)
nemo/collections/llm/gpt/model/hf_auto_model_for_causal_lm.py:94:4: C0116: Missing function or method docstring (missing-function-docstring)
nemo/collections/llm/gpt/model/hf_auto_model_for_causal_lm.py:106:4: C0116: Missing function or method docstring (missing-function-docstring)
nemo/collections/llm/gpt/model/hf_auto_model_for_causal_lm.py:120:4: C0116: Missing function or method docstring (missing-function-docstring)
nemo/collections/llm/gpt/model/hf_auto_model_for_causal_lm.py:131:4: C0116: Missing function or method docstring (missing-function-docstring)

-----------------------------------
Your code has been rated at 8.78/10
```

---

Thank you for improving NeMo's documentation!

[🤖]: Hi @akoumpa 👋,

We wanted to let you know that a [CICD pipeline](https://github.com/NVIDIA/NeMo/actions/runs/12053648565) for this PR just finished successfully

So it might be time to merge this PR or get some approvals

I'm just a bot so I'll leave it you what to do next.

//cc @pablo-garay @ko3n1g