These templates should never be included in other templates, as this leads to the appearance of very large numbers of articles being disputed.  Please remember to use these appropriately, and use the most specific messages you can find for the situation.  For placement at top of an article    What to type  What it makes  Where it goes  [ Edit] Talk Links Disputed biographies of living personstop  [ Edit] Talk Links Self-contradicting articletop  [ Edit] Talk Links One or both contradicting articlestop  [ Edit] Talk Links Disputed articlestop  [ Edit] Talk Links Disputed articles with list of topicstop  [ Edit] Talk Links Disputed articlestop  [ Edit] Talk Links Suspected hoaxestop  [ Edit] Talk Links Possible neologismstop  [ Edit] Talk Links Non-notable topic, listing the specific guideline at issuetop  [ Edit] Talk Links Non-notable topic or failing to meet the current notability guidelines (verbose)top  [ Edit] Talk Links Disputed articlestop  [ Edit] Talk Links Possibly biased articlestop  [ Edit] Talk Links Disputed article sectionsunder title  [ Edit] Talk Links Articles with unencyclopedic topic (not unused, although it may be redundant)top  [ Edit] Talk Links Articles which contain Unbalanced citations.  [ Edit] Talk Links Articles which are autobiographies and may not be NPOV because of that, with the date at which they were flagged.   For placement at top of article or section    What to type  What it makes  Where it goes  [ Edit] Talk LinksUse the article=y parameter if you use the template for the entire article, and section=y if it is used only for a particular section. To tag a specific issue, set any string of text to the parameter, such as issue=y To specify the month tagged for the categories that sort articles by month, type issue=  or issue=April 2007 Top of article or section with three or more issues  [ Edit] Talk Links Top of article, section, or talk page  [ Edit] Talk Links Lacks attributions from reliable sources. See template page for special usages.  [ Edit] Talk Links Possibly inaccurate articlestop  [ Edit] Talk Links At the top of an article or section where the text misrepresents the sources cited.  [ Edit] Talk Links Possible original research.  [ Edit] Talk Links Possible unpublished synthesis. (The text in quotation marks is replaced with the title of the article.)  [ Edit] Talk Links Top of articles or sections  [ Edit] Talk Links Pages that promote commercial products or services  [ Edit] Talk Links Pages that read like a magazine article instead of the formal tones expected of an encyclopedia.  [ Edit] Talk Links Pages that read like a fansite instead of the formal tones expected of an encyclopedia.  [ Edit] Talk Links Pages that read like a narrative and tell a story rather than providing encyclopedic information.  [ Edit] Talk Links Above the site of dispute in article or section  [ Edit] Talk Links Article or section that has weasel words  [ Edit] Talk Links Article or section that has peacock terms  [ Edit] Talk Links Article or section where information not present may be worthy of inclusion  [ Edit] Talk Links On an article where a self-published (online or in print) source is cited, and is therefore not legitimately citable as a secondary source, according to policy.  [ Edit] Talk Links Section where some sentences in a section or the text as a whole does not relay an understandable message  [ Edit] Talk Links Disputed articles or sectionstop  [ Edit] Talk Links Articles or sections where an unresolved discussion exists, and a third opinion has been requested.   For placement in or at top of a section only    What to type  What it makes  Where it goes  [ Edit] Talk Links Disputed article sectionsunder section header  [ Edit] Talk Links Disputed article sectionsunder section header  [ Edit] Talk Links Section contains possible original research.  [ Edit] Talk Links Disputed article introtop   For inline article placement    What to type  What it makes  Where it goes ,  or  [ Edit] Talk Links  After factual claims that need a citation to back them up.in-line  or  [ Edit] Talk Links After suspect citations or source referencesin-line  [ Edit] Talk Links One-sided statementsin-line  [ Edit] Talk Links After suspect citations or source referencesin-line  [ Edit] Talk Links Disputed statementsin-line  [ Edit] Talk Links After factual claims that have been checked and not found in the indicated source. Explain in Talk.in-line  [ Edit] Talk Links After text passages based upon original researchin-line  [ Edit] Talk Links After text passages based upon improper synthesisin-line  or  [ Edit] Talk Links After factual claims that could be relevant, but are not cited and are too general for a .in-line  [ Edit] Talk Links After passages mentioning general groups (such as "many scientists") that could be made more specific by naming (and citing sources for) specific individuals.in-line   after passages that appear to have a non-neutral point of view.   For placement on talk pages of articles    What to type  What it makes  Where it goes  [ Edit] Talk Links Talk pages which are likely to have incivil or hot-headed disputes.  [ Edit] Talk Links Top of article, section, or talk page  [ Edit] Talk Links Talk pagetop  [ Edit] Talk Links Talk pagetop  [ Edit] Talk Links Talk pagetop   For placement on talk pages of users  see Wikipedia:Template_messages/User_talk_namespace  See also  Wikipedia:Tagging pages for problems  Wikipedia:Responsible tagging