থেকে:  এই পাতা একটি খসড়া নির্দেশনা দেবে যার ভিত্তিতে উইকিপিডিয়া সম্পাদকগণ সিদ্ধান্ত নেবে ওয়েবভিত্তিক উপাদান, একটি ওয়েবসাইটের উপাদান কিংবা নির্দিষ্ট ওয়েবসাইট সম্পর্কে নিবন্ধ উইপিডিয়ায় রাখা যাবে কিনা। ওয়েব উপাদান যোগ করা যাবে কিন্তু এটা, ব্লগ, ইন্টারনেট ফোরাম, সংবাদদল, অনলাইন ম্যাগাজিন, অন্যান্য মাধ্যম, পডকাস্ট, ওয়েবকমিক, এবং ওয়েব পোর্টালে সীমাবদ্ধ হতে পারবেনা।  Any content accessed via the internet and engaged with primarily through a web browser is considered web content for the purposes of this guideline.Content distributed primarily through the web which does not fall under this definition should be considered a product, for which see Wikipedia:Notability (companies and corporations).  উইকিপিডিয়াকে বিজ্ঞাপণমুক্ত রাখতে উইকিপিডিয়ানদের সচেতন থাকতে হবে এবং উইকিপিডিয়ার নিবন্ধ বিজ্ঞাপণ নয় একটি দীর্ঘমেয়াদী গৃহীত ধারণা।  বিজ্ঞাপনী ধাঁচের নিবন্ধ  পরিষ্কার করে নিরপেক্ষ দৃষ্টিকোণ আনতে হবে অথবা অপসারণ করতে হবে।Articles about websites or content which fail these guidelines but are related to a topic or subject which does merit inclusion may be redirected to that topic or subject rather than be listed for deletion.  উইকিপিডিয়া কোন ওয়েব ডিরেক্টরি নয়, যাতে অন্যান্য ওয়েবসাইটের লিংক বিশেষভাবে সংযোজন করা হয় এবং সেসব লিংকের শ্রেণীবিন্যাস করা হয়। উইকিপিডিয়া কোন লিংক, ছবি কিংবা মিডিয়ার দর্পণ নয়। যেসব সকল নিবন্ধের বড় অংশে বহি:সংযোগের পরিমাণ বেশি এবং এর বিষয়বস্তুর বর্ণনা খুব সংক্ষিপ্ত তা মুছে ফেলা হবে।   যেসকল বিষয়ের উল্লেখযোগ্যতা সন্তোষজনক নয় তা দুইভাবে সমন্বয় করা হবে: একীভূতকরণ এবং  অপসারণ। কোন নিবন্ধে উল্লেখযোগ্যতা সমস্যা থাকলে তাতে  টেমপ্লেট লাগিয়ে অন্য সম্পাদকদের সমস্যা সম্পর্কে জ্ঞাত করা হবে। যখন এমন কোন নিবন্ধ অপসারণের জন্যে তালিকাভুক্ত হবে তখন  উপি:অপসারণ প্রস্তাবনায় নিবন্ধটি নিয়ে আলোচনা করা হবে। প্রস্তাবিত অপসারণ প্রক্রিয়া ব্যবহৃত হবে সেই সকল নিবন্ধের ক্ষেত্রে যা "অবিতর্কিতভাবে" অপসারণ যোগ্য।  টেমিপ্লেট ব্যবহার করা হবে  দ্রুত অপসারণের জন্য; বিস্তারিত দেখুন শর্ত নি৭।  যাচাইযোগ্য প্রমাণের উপর ভিত্তি করে সিদ্ধান্ত  In the dictionary, notable means "worthy of being noted" or "attracting notice." Wikipedia bases its decision about whether web content is notable enough to justify a separate article on the verifiable evidence that the web content has attracted the notice of reliable sources unrelated to the web content, its authors, or its owners. Notability requires only that these necessary sources exist, not that the sources have already been named in the article.  কোন সহজাত উল্লেখযোগ্যতা নয় "Notability" is not synonymous with "fame" or "importance," and even web content that editors personally believe is "important" or "famous" is only accepted as notable if it can be shown to have attracted notice. No web content is exempt from this requirement, no matter what kind of content it is. If the individual web content has received no or very little attention from independent sources, then it is not notable simply because other web content of its type is commonly notable or merely because it exists (see "If the content is not notable", below).  When evaluating the notability of web content, please consider whether it has had any significant or demonstrable effects on culture, society, entertainment, athletics, economies, history, literature, science, or education. High-traffic websites are likely to have more readily available verifiable information from reliable sources that provide evidence of notability. However, smaller websites can also be notable. Arbitrary standards should not be used to create a bias favoring larger websites.  কোন উত্তরাধিকার উল্লেখযোগ্যতা নয়  Web content is not notable merely because a notable person, business, or event was associated with it. If the web content itself did not receive notice, then the web content is not notable. For example, if a notable person has a website, then the website does not "inherit" notability from its owner. In such cases, it is often best to describe the website in the article about the notable person.  Similarly, a website may be notable, but the owners or authors do not "inherit" notability due to the web content they wrote.  শর্তাদি  Keeping in mind that all articles must conform with the policy on verifiability to reliable sources, and that non-independent and self-published sources alone are not sufficient to establish notability; web-specific contentDiscussions of websites should be incorporated (with a redirect if necessary) into an article about the parent organization, unless the domain-name of the website is the most common way of referring to the organization. For example, yahoo.com is a redirect to Yahoo!. On the other hand Drugstore.com is a standalone page. may be notable based on meeting one of the following criteria: The content itself has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the site itself. This criterion includes reliable published works in all forms, such as newspaper articles, magazine articles, books, television documentaries, websites, and published reports by consumer watchdog organizationsExamples:  The webcomic When I Am King has been reviewed by The Guardian, Playboy, The Comics Journal, and Wired.  The blog Daily Kos has been covered by Los Angeles Times, Time, The Washington Post, U.S. News & World Report, and The New York Times. except for media re-prints of press releases and advertising for the content or siteSelf-promotion and product placement are not the routes to having an encyclopedia article. The published works must be by someone else who is writing about the company, corporation, product, or service. (See Wikipedia:Autobiography for the verifiability and neutrality problems that arise in material where the subject of the article itself is the source of material cited in the article.) The barometer of notability is whether people independent of the subject itself (or of its manufacturer, creator, or vendor) have actually considered the content or site worthy enough that they have written and published non-trivial works that focus upon it. or trivial coverage, such as: a brief summary of the nature of the content or the publication of Internet addresses and site, newspaper articles that simply report the times at which such content is updated or made available, and content descriptions in directories or online stores. The website or content has won a well-known and independent award from either a publication or organization.Being nominated for such an award in multiple years may also be considered an indicator of notability.  These criteria are presented as rules of thumb for easily identifying web content that Wikipedia should probably have articles about. In almost all cases, a thorough search for independent, third-party reliable sources will be successful for content meeting one or both of these criteria. However, meeting these criteria is not an absolute guarantee that Wikipedia should have a separate, stand-alone article entirely dedicated to the content.  যদি বিষয়বস্তু উল্লেখযোগ্য না হয়  Wikipedia should not have a separate article on any web content that does not meet the criteria of either this guideline or the general notability guideline, or any web content that, despite meeting the rules of thumb described above, for whom editors ultimately cannot locate independent sources that provide in-depth information about the web content.  Wikipedia's goal is neither tiny articles with no realistic hope of expansion nor articles based primarily on what the subject or its creators say about themselves.  However, information about such web content may nevertheless be included in other ways in Wikipedia, provided that certain conditions are met.  Material about web content that does not qualify for a separate, stand-alone can be preserved by adding it into relevant articles if it:  has the appropriate level of detail and significance for that article;  avoids self-promotion; and  includes information that can be verified through independent sources.  Web content that does not qualify for a separate, stand-alone article might be described in a relevant list of web content like the List of internet phenomena.  Material about websites might be merged to articles about the organizations that own the websites.  Appropriate redirects from the subject's name should be created to help readers find such information.   আরো দেখুন   Wikipedia:Cite sources  Wikipedia:Neutral point of view  Wikipedia:No original research  Wikipedia:Reliable sources  Wikipedia:Search engine test  Wikipedia:Verifiability   টীকা   বিষয়শ্রেণী:উইকিপিডিয়া উল্লেখযোগ্যতা বিষয়শ্রেণী:উইকিপিডিয়া উল্লেখযোগ্যতা নির্দেশিকা