reglab/statecodes huggingface dataset:
Oregon Administrative Rules › Chapter 291 - DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS › Division 71 - THERAPEUTIC RESTRAINTS (USE OF) › Section 291-071-0070 - Condition and Observation

Current through Register Vol. 63, No. 7, July 1, 2024
(1) To
			 the extent possible without endangering the inmate, staff or others in the
			 facility, inmates in therapeutic restraint shall be:
(a) Offered fluids if capable of sitting up
			 or laying on the side once every hour while awake or upon request;
(b) Offered the use of a toilet, bedpan or
			 urinal once every hour while awake or upon request;
(c) Offered regular meals and the opportunity
			 to maintain personal hygiene immediately before and after each meal as
			 appropriate;
(d) Provided an
			 opportunity to have exercise of at least ten minutes during each two hours of
			 restraint. (These opportunities apply only during non-sleeping hours from 6:00
			 a.m. to 9:00 p.m.);
(e)
			 Appropriately clothed which at a minimum includes underclothes, stockings and
			 to be covered with a sheet.
Oregon Administrative Rules › Chapter 291 - DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS › Division 71 - THERAPEUTIC RESTRAINTS (USE OF) › Section 291-071-0080 - Review

Current through Register Vol. 63, No. 7, July 1, 2024
(1) Any application
			 of therapeutic restraint must be reported to the Director or designee within
			 one working day of such application.
(2) The Director or designee will review and
			 evaluate the appropriateness of each application of therapeutic restraint at
			 least quarterly and prepare a written report summarizing the
			 conclusion.
Stat. Auth.: ORS
				  179.040, ORS
				  423.020, ORS
				  423.030 & ORS
				  423.075
Stats. Implemented: ORS
				  179.040, ORS
				  423.020, ORS
				  423.030 & ORS
				  423.075
Oregon Administrative Rules › Chapter 291 - DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS › Division 72 - ID CARDS (AIC) › Section 291-072-0005 - Authority, Purpose, and Policy

Current through Register Vol. 63, No. 7, July 1, 2024
(1)
			 Authority: The authority for this rule is granted to the Director of the
			 Department of Corrections in accordance with ORS
			 179.040,
			 423.020,
			 423.030, and
			 423.075.
(2) Purpose: The purpose of these rules is to
			 establish Department of Corrections policy and procedures for the establishment
			 of a photo identification card system for adults in custody (AIC) who are
			 incarcerated in a Department of Corrections facility, and for the possession
			 and use of the identification cards by adults in custody.
(3) Policy:
(a) It is the policy of the Department of
			 Corrections to ensure positive identification of adults in custody by issuing a
			 photo identification card to each adult in custody. The issuance and use of AIC
			 identification cards are further specified in this rule.
(b) Establishment of a photo identification
			 card system for adults in custody is authorized by the Director for use in each
			 functional unit.
Oregon Administrative Rules › Chapter 291 - DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS › Division 72 - ID CARDS (AIC) › Section 291-072-0007 - Definitions

Current through Register Vol. 63, No. 7, July 1, 2024
(1) Adult in
			 Custody (AIC): Any person under the supervision of Department of Corrections
			 who is not on parole, post-prison supervision, or probation status.
(2) AIC Identification Card: A photo
			 identification card issued by the Department of Corrections to an AIC that must
			 be displayed by the AIC on their person while incarcerated in a Department of
			 Corrections facility in accordance with these rules. The AIC identification
			 card is a permanent identification card that will be retained by and
			 transferred with the AIC between Department of Corrections
			 facilities.
(3) AIC Release Card: A
			 photo identification card issued to an AIC upon their release from a Department
			 of Corrections facility.
(4) Court
			 Name: The AIC name as established and used by the Department of Corrections for
			 use on an AIC's case file, AIC identification card, medical file, etc., based
			 on the name provided in the first judgment in the custody cycle sentencing an
			 AIC to the custody of the Oregon Department of Corrections.
(5) Department of Corrections Facility: Any
			 institution, facility, or staff office, including the grounds, operated by the
			 Department of Corrections.
(6)
			 Electronic Tracking Technology Systems (ETTS): Combinations of software and
			 hardware that are used to monitor the location and authorized access of
			 AICs.
(7) Functional Unit Manager:
			 Any person within the Department of Corrections who reports to either the
			 Director, Deputy Director, an Assistant Director, or an administrator and who
			 has responsibility for delivery of program services or coordination of program
			 operations. In an institution the functional unit manager is the
			 superintendent.
(8) Legal Name: An
			 alternative AIC name requested by an AIC that is a) materially different from
			 the court name, b) supported by legal documentation of the AIC's legal name and
			 c) authorized for use by the Department of Corrections on the AIC's case file,
			 identification card, medical file, etc.
(9) Temporary AIC Identification Card: A
			 temporary paper identification card issued by the Department of Corrections to
			 an AIC that must be displayed by the AIC on their person while incarcerated in
			 a Department of Corrections facility in accordance with these rules.
(10) True Name: An alternative name added to
			 an AIC's case file and used as an additional identifier when supporting
			 documentation is received (e.g. legal name change, birth certificate, marriage
			 license) to the satisfaction of the department.
(11) Visual Identifiers: Visible elements
			 used in conjunction with identification cards such as mechanisms to hold and
			 display cards, etc. which allow for rapid identification of information.
Statutory/Other Authority: ORS
				  423.020,
				  423.075,
				  423.030 &
				  179.040
Statutes/Other Implemented: ORS
				  423.020,
				  423.075,
				  423.030 &
				  179.040
Oregon Administrative Rules › Chapter 291 - DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS › Division 72 - ID CARDS (AIC) › Section 291-072-0010 - Procedures

Current through Register Vol. 63, No. 7, July 1, 2024
(1) ID Card
			 Issuance:
(a) The Department of Corrections
			 shall issue an AIC identification card to each AIC upon their delivery to the
			 Oregon Corrections Intake Center or other designated Department of Corrections
			 facility.
(b) If identification
			 cards must be issued after hours, staff shall follow the institution photo ID
			 card process.
(c) All
			 identification cards, except for the AIC release card, shall use the AIC's
			 court or legal name. AIC release cards will use the true name if it is
			 validated in the DOC 400 Corrections Information System (CIS).
(d) Management plan indicators may be printed
			 on the back of the identification card.
Oregon Administrative Rules › Chapter 291 - DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS › Division 73 - MANDATORY AND DESIRABLE CRITERIA FOR SITING CORRECTIONAL FACILITIES › Section 291-073-0010 - Authority and Purpose

Current through Register Vol. 63, No. 7, July 1, 2024
(1)
			 Authority: The authority for this rule is granted to the Director of the
			 Department of Corrections in accordance with ORS
			 179.040,
			 421.614,
			 423.020,
			 423.030 and
			 423.075.
(2) Purpose: The purpose of this rule is to
			 establish mandatory and desirable criteria to be used in the nomination of
			 sites for the construction and operation of Oregon correctional
			 facilities.
Stat. Auth.: ORS
				  179.040, ORS
				  421.614, ORS
				  423.020, ORS
				  423.030 & ORS
				  423.075
Stats. Implemented: ORS
				  179.040, ORS
				  421.614, ORS
				  423.020, ORS
				  423.030 & ORS
				  423.075
Oregon Administrative Rules › Chapter 291 - DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS › Division 73 - MANDATORY AND DESIRABLE CRITERIA FOR SITING CORRECTIONAL FACILITIES › Section 291-073-0020 - Mandatory Criteria for all Sites

Current through Register Vol. 63, No. 7, July 1, 2024
The mandatory criteria for all sites (including medium security
				and minimum work camps) are listed below. They are not in any order of
				preference.
(1) A proposed site must
			 be available by purchase, condemnation, exchange or otherwise.
(2) A proposed site must be of sufficient
			 size and shape to accommodate the planned facility and its operation.
(3) A proposed site must not be located in a
			 100-year flood plain as defined by a current FEMA map.
(4) A proposed site must not be in a
			 designated tsunami inundation zone.
(5) A proposed site must have infrastructure
			 available either on-site or such that they can be provided and maintained cost
			 effectively. This infrastructure includes:
(a) Water for domestic use, fire protection,
			 and irrigation;
(b) Sanitary sewer
			 collection and treatment;
(c)
			 Surface drainage and storm water collection and disposal; and
(d) Electricity, natural gas and/or oil or
			 propane and telecommunications.
Oregon Administrative Rules › Chapter 291 - DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS › Division 73 - MANDATORY AND DESIRABLE CRITERIA FOR SITING CORRECTIONAL FACILITIES › Section 291-073-0030 - Desirable Criteria for Medium Security Sites

Current through Register Vol. 63, No. 7, July 1, 2024
The desirable criteria for medium security sites are listed
				below. They are not in any order of preference. An alternate means of meeting
				the intent of a criterion may be considered.
(1) A proposed site which is available at
			 little or no cost.
(2) A proposed
			 site which has 200-300 acres with 300 acres being the preferred size.
(3) A proposed site which is square or nearly
			 so.
(4) A proposed site which is
			 relatively flat to minimize earthwork, foundation, construction costs, and
			 surface or subsurface drainage construction costs.
(5) A proposed site which has natural buffers
			 from surrounding land uses such as lakes, rivers, or ridges.
(6) A proposed site which is not adjacent to
			 a school unless the parcel is buffered.
(7) A proposed site which is not adjacent to
			 a developed single-family or multi-family residential area unless the parcel is
			 buffered.
(8) A proposed site in
			 which the soils shall not be unduly prone to liquefaction due to seismic
			 activity.
(9) A proposed site with
			 existing buildings that can be remodeled for utilization in new
			 construction.
(10) A proposed site
			 not subject to flooding from adjacent bodies of water, natural surface
			 drainage, or subsurface high-water table.
(11) A proposed site not having an
			 environmental, ecological, cultural, or historic feature or condition which
			 cannot be mitigated with remediation or health risk assessment prior to the
			 beginning of site development. These conditions include, but may not be limited
			 to, wetlands, historic or culturally significant sites, or habitat for
			 federally designated threatened and endangered species.
(12) A proposed site that maximizes the use
			 of present Department of Corrections facilities and considers such institution
			 management issues as warehousing, adult in custody transportation, and adult in
			 custody management, etc.
(13) A
			 proposed site which has judicial, emergency, and support services availability:
(a) Fifteen minutes or less to local or state
			 police, full-service fire department, and emergency medical transport or
			 care;
(b) Sixty minutes or less to
			 a National Guard unit;
(c)
			 Forty-five minutes or less response time from licensed full service in-patient
			 care hospital that accepts Oregon Health Plan payment;
(d) Forty-five minutes or less to educational
			 institutions to provide GED or vocational-technical programs for adults in
			 custody;
(e) Ninety minutes or less
			 to higher education opportunities for staff development;
(f) Adequate providers of support services to
			 adults in custody, including counseling, religious, job training, and
			 education; and
(g) Reasonable
			 access to court facilities.
Oregon Administrative Rules › Chapter 291 - DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS › Division 73 - MANDATORY AND DESIRABLE CRITERIA FOR SITING CORRECTIONAL FACILITIES › Section 291-073-0040 - Desirable Criteria for Minimum Security Work Camp Sites

Current through Register Vol. 63, No. 7, July 1, 2024
The desirable criteria for minimum security work camps sites
				are listed below. They are not in any order of preference. An alternate means
				of meeting the intent of a criterion may be considered.
(1) A proposed site which is available at
			 little or no cost.
(2) A proposed
			 site which has 25-30 acres with 30 acres being the preferred size.
(3) A proposed site which is square or nearly
			 so.
(4) A proposed site in which
			 the topography will minimize earthwork, foundation, construction costs, and
			 surface or subsurface drainage construction costs.
(5) A proposed site which has natural buffers
			 from surrounding land uses such as lakes, rivers, or ridges.
(6) A proposed site which is rural; isolated
			 locations are appropriate.
(7) A
			 proposed site in which the soils shall not be unduly prone to liquefaction due
			 to seismic activity.
(8) A proposed
			 site which has appropriate soil percolation capacity to use septic tank and
			 drain field if one is proposed for the site.
(9) A proposed site with existing buildings
			 that can be remodeled for utilization in new construction.
(10) A proposed site not subject to flooding
			 from adjacent bodies of water, natural surface drainage, or subsurface
			 high-water table.
(11) A proposed
			 site not having an environmental, ecological, cultural, or historic feature or
			 condition which cannot be mitigated with remediation or health risk assessment
			 prior to the beginning of site development. These conditions include, but may
			 not be limited to wetlands, historic or culturally significant sites, or
			 habitat for federally designated threatened and endangered species.
(12) A proposed site that maximizes the use
			 of present Department of Corrections facilities and considers such institution
			 management issues as warehousing, adult in custody transportation, and adult in
			 custody management, etc.
(13) A
			 proposed site which has judicial, emergency, and support services availability:
(a) Thirty minutes or less to local or state
			 police, full-service fire department, and emergency medical transport or care;
			 and
(b) Sixty minutes or less
			 response time from licensed full service in-patient care hospital that accepts
			 Oregon Health Plan payment.
Oregon Administrative Rules › Chapter 291 - DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS › Division 73 - MANDATORY AND DESIRABLE CRITERIA FOR SITING CORRECTIONAL FACILITIES › Section 291-073-0100 - Authority, Purpose and Policy

Current through Register Vol. 63, No. 7, July 1, 2024
(1)
			 Authority: The authority for this rule is granted to the Director of the
			 Department of Corrections in accordance with ORS
			 179.040,
			 423.020,
			 423.030, and
			 423.075.
(2) Purpose: The purpose of this rule is to
			 establish as policy of the Department of Corrections the appropriate
			 utilization of approximately 104 acres of real property owned by the department
			 situated in Marion County, Oregon, inside the City of Salem bordering the
			 Oregon State Correctional Institution described in Exhibit A and hereinafter
			 referred to as the "Savanna Haven Property."
(3) Policy:
(a) As provided in the Oregon Sustainability
			 Act, ORS 184.423, Oregon agencies, in
			 their operations, "should help reduce adverse impacts on native habitats and
			 species and help restore ecological processes."
(b) The department understands that
			 utilization of the Savanna Haven Property must be in compliance with the
			 following:
(A) ORS
			 184.423;
(B) ORS
			 276.054;
(C) City of Salem zoning requirement; and
(D) Salem Area Comprehensive Plan
			 (Southeast Salem Area Plan).
(c) Consistent with the Oregon Sustainability
			 Act and with the values and purposes described more fully below, it is the
			 policy of the Department of Corrections to maintain and utilize the Savanna
			 Haven Property in a manner that preserves the habitat values of the existing
			 oak savanna and secures the area from commercial and industrial encroachment,
			 as set forth in these rules.
Oregon Administrative Rules › Chapter 291 - DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS › Division 73 - MANDATORY AND DESIRABLE CRITERIA FOR SITING CORRECTIONAL FACILITIES › Section 291-073-0110 - Utilization

Current through Register Vol. 63, No. 7, July 1, 2024
(1) The Savanna
			 Haven Property is a relatively undeveloped area that possesses scenic,
			 aesthetic, open space, agricultural, natural resources, and wildlife habitat
			 values (collectively "conservation values") of great importance to the people
			 of Marion County and the State of Oregon. Among the specific conservation
			 values of the Savanna Haven Property are valuable ecological systems and plant
			 communities, including but not limited to the following:
(a) Vegetative communities ranging from
			 grassland and oak savanna to mixed Oregon white oak and conifer woodlands;
(b) Bird species such as the acorn
			 woodpecker, white breasted nuthatch, and American kestrel rely upon the savanna
			 (grassland interspersed with oak groves), the woodland, or both for nesting and
			 feeding grounds.
Oregon Administrative Rules › Chapter 291 - DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS › Division 75 - CITIZEN COMPLAINTS › Section 291-075-0005 - Authority, Purpose, and Policy

Current through Register Vol. 63, No. 7, July 1, 2024
(1)
			 Authority: The authority for this rule is granted to the Director of the
			 Department of Corrections in accordance with ORS
			 179.040,
			 423.020,
			 423.030, and
			 423.075.
(2) Purpose: The purpose of this rule is to
			 provide for the reporting, receipt, investigation, and resolution of citizen
			 complaints concerning the Department of Corrections, its employees, and inmates
			 and offenders under its jurisdiction.
(3) Policy: It is the policy of the
			 Department of Corrections that citizen complaints about the Department of
			 Corrections personnel, programs and operations shall be logged and promptly
			 investigated. Corrective action shall be taken if indicated, and a response
			 furnished to the complainant.
Stat. Auth.: ORS
				  179.040, ORS
				  423.020, ORS
				  423.030 & ORS
				  423.075
Stats. Implemented: ORS
				  179.040, ORS
				  423.020, ORS
				  423.030 & ORS
				  423.075
Oregon Administrative Rules › Chapter 291 - DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS › Division 75 - CITIZEN COMPLAINTS › Section 291-075-0010 - Definitions

Current through Register Vol. 63, No. 7, July 1, 2024
(1) Citizen
			 Complaint: Any person writing to the Governor's Office requesting a response
			 regarding the Oregon Department of Corrections.
(2) Functional Unit Manager: Any person
			 within the Department of Corrections who reports to the Director, Deputy
			 Director, an assistant director, or an administrator and has responsibility for
			 the delivery of program services or coordination of program
			 operations.
(3) Oregon Corrections
			 Enterprises: A semi-independent state agency that is a non-Department of
			 Corrections agency or division, which is under the authority of the Director of
			 the Department of Corrections. For purposes of this rule only, Oregon
			 Corrections Enterprises shall not be considered an external
			 organization.
Stat. Auth.: ORS
				  179.040,
				  423.020,
				  423.030 &
				  423.075
Stats. Implemented: ORS
				  179.040,
				  423.020,
				  423.030 &
				  423.075
Oregon Administrative Rules › Chapter 291 - DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS › Division 75 - CITIZEN COMPLAINTS › Section 291-075-0015 - Procedures

Current through Register Vol. 63, No. 7, July 1, 2024
(1) All citizen
			 complaints directed to the Governor's Office and forwarded to the Department of
			 Corrections regarding the Department or Oregon Corrections Enterprises shall be
			 reviewed and logged by the Director's designee. The citizen complaint shall be
			 assigned to the functional unit manager, Oregon Corrections Enterprises, or
			 Inspector General's Office for investigation. All complaints alleging criminal
			 conduct will be referred to the Oregon State Police by the Inspector General
			 for review and investigation as appropriate.
(a) The functional unit manager, Oregon
			 Corrections Enterprises, or Inspector General shall investigate the complaint
			 and submit a response to the Director's designee within the assigned timeframe.
			 The functional unit manager, Oregon Corrections Enterprises, or Inspector
			 General shall recommend corrective action if the investigation reveals such
			 action is needed.
(b) Where
			 necessary corrective action has been recommended, that action shall be taken
			 upon the approval of the Director, functional unit manager, Oregon Corrections
			 Enterprises, or Inspector General's Office. When a letter of response is
			 needed, the letter shall be prepared with the signature of the Director,
			 functional unit manager, Oregon Corrections Enterprises, or Inspector General's
			 Office as appropriate.
(c) A
			 response delineating the investigation and action taken shall be signed by the
			 Director, functional unit manager, Oregon Corrections Enterprises, or Inspector
			 General's Office and given to the complainant within the assigned timeframe. A
			 copy of the response will be forwarded to the Governor's Office. If additional
			 investigation time is required, the Governor's Office will be informed in
			 advance so that the complainant will be appropriately notified.
Oregon Administrative Rules › Chapter 291 - DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS › Division 76 - SUICIDE PREVENTION IN CORRECTIONAL FACILITIES › Section 291-076-0010 - Authority, Purpose and Policy

Current through Register Vol. 63, No. 7, July 1, 2024
(1)
			 Authority: The authority for this rule is granted to the Director of the
			 Department of Corrections in accordance with ORS
			 179.040,
			 423.020,
			 423.030, and
			 423.075.
(2) Purpose: The purpose of this rule is to
			 prevent suicides among the inmate population.
(3) Policy: It is the policy of the
			 Department of Corrections to provide immediate assistance whenever an inmate
			 demonstrates, or is reported to be at risk of self-destructive
			 behavior.
Stat. Auth.: ORS
				  179.040, ORS
				  423.020, ORS
				  423.030 & ORS 423,075
Stats. Implemented: ORS
				  179.040, ORS
				  423.020, ORS
				  423.030 & ORS
				  423.075
Oregon Administrative Rules › Chapter 291 - DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS › Division 76 - SUICIDE PREVENTION IN CORRECTIONAL FACILITIES › Section 291-076-0020 - Definitions

Current through Register Vol. 63, No. 7, July 1, 2024
(1) Behavioral
			 Health Services (BHS): A unit of ODOC Health Services with primary
			 responsibility for the assessment and treatment of inmates with mental illness
			 and developmental disabilities.
(2)
			 Mental Health Provider: Any person employed by the Department or engaged by
			 contract with the Department for the explicit purpose of providing mental
			 health services.
(3) Suicide
			 Assessment: A brief but formal assessment of mental status conducted by a
			 mental health provider or a registered nurse in consultation with a mental
			 health provider, concluding with a judged level of suicidal risk.
(4) Suicide Attempt: Any self-injury
			 requiring significant medical intervention as determined by a mental health
			 provider
(5) Suicide Close
			 Observation: In moderate risk situations, unobstructed visual observation of
			 the inmate is required at staggered intervals, not to exceed 15 minutes, with
			 recorded observation within each 15 minute interval.
(6) Suicide Warning Signs: The following list
			 provides some of the indicators of suicide potential:
(a) Talk of suicide, threats of
			 suicide;
(b) Extreme sadness or
			 crying;
(c) Apathy, loss of
			 interest in all or almost all people and activities;
(d) Loss of appetite or weight;
(e) Walking or completing tasks at an
			 unusually slow speed;
(f)
			 Difficulty concentrating or thinking;
(g) Sleep disturbances;
(h) Emotional flatness; seems numb,
			 non-reactive;
(i) Difficulty
			 carrying out routine tasks; e.g., eating, dressing, etc.;
(j) Tension and agitation; inability to relax
			 or sit still, pacing, hand wringing;
(k) Withdrawal, silent,
			 uncommunicative;
(l) Pessimistic
			 attitude about the future;
(m)
			 Emotional outbursts, sudden expression of anger for no apparent reason;
			 or
(n) Feeling of hopelessness and
			 helplessness.
Oregon Administrative Rules › Chapter 291 - DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS › Division 76 - SUICIDE PREVENTION IN CORRECTIONAL FACILITIES › Section 291-076-0030 - Procedures

Current through Register Vol. 63, No. 7, July 1, 2024
(1) Identification:
			 All new admissions to the Department of Corrections will receive a mental
			 health screening interview as part of the intake process. The mental health
			 screening will include mental health history, suicide potential, evidence of
			 psychosis, or other acute mental health emergency.
(2) Training: All employees having direct
			 inmate contact will receive suicide prevention training.
(a) Suicide warning signs, prevention
			 strategies, and response procedures will be present in New Employee Orientation
			 (NEO) and in annual in-service training.
(b) Suicide prevention training curriculum
			 will be approved by the Administrator of Behavioral Health Services.
(c) Additional training is required of staff
			 on special housing units where mentally ill or suicidal risk inmates are
			 concentrated.
Oregon Administrative Rules › Chapter 291 - DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS › Division 76 - SUICIDE PREVENTION IN CORRECTIONAL FACILITIES › Section 291-076-0040 - Review

Current through Register Vol. 63, No. 7, July 1, 2024
(1) Suicide Review:
			 If a suicide occurs, a formal suicide review will be completed as assigned by
			 the Inspector General, including a review of the inmate's Health Services
			 files, related materials, and interviews of staff.
(a) The actual review of the Health Services
			 files, related materials, and interviews of staff will be conducted by a
			 multi-disciplinary team comprised of an assigned Special Investigations Unit
			 manager, Assistant Superintendent of Security, Medical Services manager and
			 Behavioral Health Services manager from a facility other than the facility
			 where the suicide occurred.
(b) The
			 Inspector General will appoint the chair of the team.
(c) The team will write a review and submit
			 it to the Inspector General.
(d)
			 The Inspector General will submit the review to the Director, Deputy Director,
			 Assistant Director for Operations, Health Services Administrator, Behavioral
			 Health Services Administrator, and the functional unit manager where the
			 suicide occurred.
Oregon Administrative Rules › Chapter 291 - DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS › Division 77 - PERFORMANCE RECOGNITION AND AWARD SYSTEM › Section 291-077-0010 - Authority, Purpose and Policy

Current through Register Vol. 63, No. 7, July 1, 2024
(1)
			 Authority: The authority for this rule is granted to the Director of the
			 Department of Corrections in accordance with ORS
			 179.040,
			 421.440,
			 423.020,
			 423.030, and
			 423.075 and Article I, Section
			 41 of the Oregon Constitution.
(2)
			 Purpose: The purpose of this rule is to establish Department of Corrections
			 policy and procedures governing its provision and distribution of monetary
			 awards and other incentives to inmates made under the department's Performance
			 Recognition and Awards System (PRAS).
(3) Policy:
(a) Within the inherent limitations of
			 resources and the need for facility security, safety, health and order, it is
			 the policy of the Department of Corrections to make available to inmates
			 monetary awards and other incentives to recognize and encourage good
			 institutional conduct. This includes exceptional performance in work and
			 workforce development assignments and in self-improvement programs that address
			 the criminal behaviors that led to their incarceration.
(b) Monetary awards provided to inmates under
			 the PRAS and these rules are made available solely at the discretion of the
			 Department, and may include the following:
(A) Performance awards that support the
			 development of good performance and behaviors by inmates in Department of
			 Corrections facilities; and
(B)
			 Special Meritorious Awards that reward exceptional acts or behaviors by inmates
			 that contribute to the safe and orderly operation of Department of Corrections
			 facilities.
(c)
			 Non-Monetary Incentives: Functional unit managers will examine the assets and
			 practices of their facility and develop and implement non-monetary incentives
			 that support the mission of the Department of Corrections and motivate inmates
			 toward positive institutional behaviors and program compliance.
Oregon Administrative Rules › Chapter 291 - DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS › Division 77 - PERFORMANCE RECOGNITION AND AWARD SYSTEM › Section 291-077-0020 - Definitions

Current through Register Vol. 63, No. 7, July 1, 2024
(1) Approved
			 Programming: Inmate program assignments which are in compliance with the
			 inmate's Oregon Corrections Plan or Article I, Section 41 of the Oregon
			 Constitution.
(2) Functional Unit
			 Manager: Any person within the Department of Corrections who reports to either
			 the Director, an Assistant Director, or administrator and has responsibility
			 for delivery of program services or coordination of program operations. In a
			 correctional facility, the superintendent is the functional unit
			 manager.
(3) General Population:
			 For the purposes of these rules, any housing assignment that is not special
			 housing as described in section (8) below including general population inmates
			 out to court or out of the facility for medical or other reasons.
(4) Non-Monetary Incentive Program (also
			 called Non-Cash Incentives Program): A program developed to enhance PRAS. This
			 system will utilize "non-cash" items or activities to recognize inmates for
			 their past and continued successful performance in approved programming and
			 good institutional conduct.
(5)
			 Performance Awards: Monthly monetary awards made to inmates at the discretion
			 of the department to support the development of good performance and behavior
			 and provide inmates with incentives to fully participate in programs that
			 address criminal thinking, workforce development needs, substance abuse
			 problems, and other contributors to their criminal behavior.
(6) Program Failure: Removal from a program
			 for failure to satisfactorily perform in a program assignment or refusal to
			 participate in a recommended or required program.
(7) Qualifying Programs: Any qualifying
			 inmate assignment, including work, training, treatment and workforce
			 development. Qualifying programs may include, but are not limited to the
			 following:
(a) Work based education (WBE)
			 program assignments in which inmates perform a service or produce a product.
			 Many of the programs may include both training and production
			 components.
(b) Treatment
			 assignments that address diagnosed mental or behavioral problems that are
			 barriers to successful employment, including but not limited to, alcohol and
			 drug treatment or mental health day treatment; and
(c) Workforce development assignments
			 intended to remove educational barriers (e.g., Adult Basic Education (ABE) or
			 English as a Second Language (ESL)) or address personal deficits (e.g., Anger
			 Management or Basic Living Skills) that impede employment.
Oregon Administrative Rules › Chapter 291 - DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS › Division 77 - PERFORMANCE RECOGNITION AND AWARD SYSTEM › Section 291-077-0030 - Performance Awards

Current through Register Vol. 63, No. 7, July 1, 2024
(1) All inmates
			 housed in a Department of Corrections facility, or housed with a designated
			 outside agency while participating in a work release program administered under
			 the authority of the Department of Corrections, except inmates who are provided
			 compensation by the department or Oregon Corrections Enterprises for their
			 daily full-time participation in a Prison Industries Enhancement (PIE)
			 certified inmate work program, may be considered at the discretion of the
			 department for a monthly performance award in accordance with these
			 rules.
(2) The awards will be made
			 based on three primary considerations: the level of responsibility associated
			 with an inmate's program assignments; the level of performance demonstrated by
			 the inmate in his/her program assignments; and the inmate's institutional
			 conduct. Individual performance awards will be determined based on each
			 eligible inmate's total monthly performance points.
(3) Daily Points: The department will credit
			 each eligible inmate with points equal to the value of the responsibility level
			 for the inmate's program assignment for each day of satisfactory work
			 performance of a qualifying program. Satisfactory level of performance will be
			 determined on a pass/fail basis. The total points credited to the inmate for
			 each day equals the inmate's daily points.
(4) Monthly Performance Points:
(a) Each month the department will add
			 together the inmate's daily points for that month to determine the inmate's
			 monthly performance points. The monetary awards associated with specific ranges
			 of accrued points earned during the month are set forth in Appendix
			 A.
(b) The department will deduct a
			 fixed percentage of each performance award made to inmates under these rules,
			 to be credited to a general victims assistance fund. The department will credit
			 the remainder of any monetary award to each recipient inmate's trust
			 account.
Oregon Administrative Rules › Chapter 291 - DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS › Division 77 - PERFORMANCE RECOGNITION AND AWARD SYSTEM › Section 291-077-0033 - Behavioral Adjustments, Unsatisfactory Performance and Program Failures

Current through Register Vol. 63, No. 7, July 1, 2024
(1) Daily Fail:
			 Program supervisors may submit a fail assessment of an inmate's daily
			 performance in any qualifying program.
(a)
			 When a daily fail assessment is submitted, it is the supervisor's
			 responsibility to complete a Record of Inmate Daily Performance Failure (CD
			 118a).
(b) One copy will be given
			 directly to the inmate, one copy attached to the daily attendance roster, and
			 remaining copies distributed in accordance with institution-specific
			 procedures.
Oregon Administrative Rules › Chapter 291 - DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS › Division 77 - PERFORMANCE RECOGNITION AND AWARD SYSTEM › Section 291-077-0035 - Non-Monetary Incentives (Non-Cash Incentives)

Current through Register Vol. 63, No. 7, July 1, 2024
The purpose of non-cash incentives is to enhance cost effective
				inmate management by providing tiered access to services and privileges at
				department facilities. Non-cash incentives encourage pro-social behavior among
				inmates consistent with good correctional practices and the mission of the
				department. Functional unit managers may limit an inmate's access to services
				and privileges available within the incentive level attained by the inmate, as
				necessary, to ensure the safe and secure operation of the facility and within
				resources available to and physical plant limitations of the facility.
(1) General:
(a) Functional unit managers will develop a
			 list of services and privileges specific to their facility as part of the DOC
			 non-cash incentives program (institution incentive level matrix).
(b) Specific services and privileges
			 available to inmates may differ between facilities depending on size and
			 configuration of space and availability of resources.
(c) Some incentive services and privileges
			 will be offered consistently throughout the department at each facility, when
			 possible, as outlined in Appendix C.
(d) There will be three incentive levels
			 (Level I, Level II, and Level III) available to inmates.
(e) Incentive Level I is a restricted level
			 statewide. Restrictions imposed may differ between facilities due to the size
			 and configuration of each facility. Level I inmates are identified with an
			 orange identification card.
(f)
			 Incentive Level II offers more services and privileges than Level I. Level II
			 inmates are identified with the standard identification card (red fading into
			 white).
(g) Incentive Level III is
			 the highest attainable incentive level. Level III inmates are identified with a
			 silver, holographic tamper resistant "NCI 3" sticker placed on their
			 identification.
(h) Incentive
			 levels will be calculated electronically at the end of each business day and
			 made available to staff the following business day.
Oregon Administrative Rules › Chapter 291 - DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS › Division 77 - PERFORMANCE RECOGNITION AND AWARD SYSTEM › Section 291-077-0040 - Special Meritorious Awards

Current through Register Vol. 63, No. 7, July 1, 2024
Inmates are eligible to be considered at the discretion of the
				department for special meritorious awards, as follows:
(1) Exceptional Acts or Behaviors: The
			 functional unit manager may grant an inmate a special meritorious award for
			 exceptionally positive acts or behaviors of significant benefit to the agency,
			 staff, inmates, or the public, as follows:
(a)
			 Acts of outstanding heroism;
(b)
			 Satisfactory performance of an unusually difficult or hazardous assignment that
			 requires personal responsibility related to public safety;
(c) Suggestions which result in substantial
			 improvement of programs or definite economies of operation; or
(d) Other clearly exceptional or outstanding
			 services which are consistent with the character of, but are not specified in,
			 the above.
Oregon Administrative Rules › Chapter 291 - DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS › Division 78 - COMMUNITY CASE MANAGEMENT › Section 291-078-0005 - Authority, Purpose, and Policy

Current through Register Vol. 63, No. 7, July 1, 2024
(1)
			 Authority: The authority for these rules is granted to the Director of the
			 Department of Corrections in accordance with ORS
			 179.040,
			 423.020,
			 423.030, and
			 423.075.
(2) Purpose: The purpose of this rule is to:
(a) Provide uniform business practices in
			 accordance with evidence-based practices of case management for adults on
			 supervision in the community;
(b)
			 Establish a level of statewide consistency for the classification of adults on
			 supervision based upon the risk of recidivism;
(c) Operate on the principle of limited risk
			 control and utilize an objective risk assessment tool for making classification
			 decisions;
(d) Quantify workload,
			 including both investigative and supervision services;
(e) Assign levels of supervision;
(f) Provide the data necessary for policy
			 decisions, program planning, effective utilization of resources, research, and
			 evaluation;
(g) Enhance corrections
			 system credibility by providing a means of accountability through established
			 auditing methods; and
(h) Provide
			 workload data which may be used for resource allocation.
Oregon Administrative Rules › Chapter 291 - DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS › Division 78 - COMMUNITY CASE MANAGEMENT › Section 291-078-0015

Current through Register Vol. 63, No. 7, July 1, 2024
Stat. Auth.: ORS
				  179.040,
				  423.020,
				  423.030 &
				  423.075
Stats. Implemented: ORS
				  179.040,
				  423.020,
				  423.030 &
				  423.075
Oregon Administrative Rules › Chapter 291 - DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS › Division 78 - COMMUNITY CASE MANAGEMENT › Section 291-078-0020 - Risk Assessment

Current through Register Vol. 63, No. 7, July 1, 2024
(1) Proper
			 assessment ensures the classification of adults on supervision according to
			 risk and their assignment to specified levels of community supervision. The
			 following risk assessment tools are utilized by the Department of Corrections
			 and county community corrections agencies for risk assessment of adults on
			 supervision:
(a) Public Safety Checklist (PSC)
			 (version 2005): A statistical calculation developed by the Oregon Criminal
			 Justice Commission in collaboration with the Department of Corrections'
			 research unit to predict an individual's risk to recidivate within three years
			 of release from custody or admission to probation.
(b) Proxy (version 2005): A three-question
			 validated risk assessment tool used to identify initial risk for individuals
			 entering probation supervision.
(c)
			 Level of Service/Case Management Inventory (LS/CMI) Section 1 General Risk/Need
			 Factors (version Feb. 2013): A validated assessment tool used to determine an
			 adult on supervision's risk to recidivate and identify criminogenic risk
			 factors across eight domains (Criminal History, Education/Employment,
			 Family/Marital, Leisure/Recreation, Companions, Alcohol/Drug Problem,
			 Procriminal Attitude/Orientation, Antisocial Pattern).
(d) Women's Risk Need Assessment (WRNA)
			 (version 6.0): A validated post-sentencing assessment instrument used to:
(A) Determine a woman's risk to recidivate;
			 and
(B) Identify criminogenic risk
			 factors, strengths, and responsivity needs in order to provide comprehensive
			 case planning and gender-responsive services.
(e) Ontario Domestic Assault Risk Assessment
			 (ODARA) (version June 2004): Actuarial risk assessment tool to assess risk of
			 committing future battering in cases where a male has assaulted his
			 partner.
(f) Stable-2007 (version
			 Sept. 2012): Actuarial risk assessment designed to assess risk of sexually
			 recidivating over time using static risk factors used in conjunction with the
			 Acute-2007.
(g) Acute-2007 (version
			 Aug. 2012): Actuarial risk and needs scale for the assessment of an adult on
			 supervision who has committed a sexual crime and the probability of sexual and
			 violent recidivism based upon dynamic needs measured at each supervision
			 contact.
(h) Static-99R and
			 Definitions (version 2003, age coding August 2016): A ten item actuarial
			 assessment instrument for use with adult males who have committed a sex crime
			 and who are at least 18 years of age at the time of admission to
			 supervision.
(i) The risk
			 assessment tools listed in (a) through (h) above are filed with this rule and
			 are available on request from the Department of Corrections or at the Secretary
			 of State's Office.
Oregon Administrative Rules › Chapter 291 - DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS › Division 78 - COMMUNITY CASE MANAGEMENT › Section 291-078-0021 - Minimum Contact Standards

Current through Register Vol. 63, No. 7, July 1, 2024
(1)
			 General:
(a) The location, frequency, and
			 manner of reporting for purposes of supervision must be focused on client
			 success while seeking to minimize disruptions to the life of the supervised
			 person, avoid unnecessary hardships, and offer a broad array of reporting
			 options.
(b) The frequency of
			 measurable contacts with adults on supervision shall be determined by the
			 associated supervision level in accordance with these rules.
Oregon Administrative Rules › Chapter 291 - DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS › Division 78 - COMMUNITY CASE MANAGEMENT › Section 291-078-0026 - Community Case Management and Planning

Current through Register Vol. 63, No. 7, July 1, 2024
(1) Individualized case plans shall be
			 prepared on all high and medium risk adults on supervision within 60 days of
			 admission to supervision or release from custody. Case plans may be prepared on
			 all other adults on supervision at the discretion of the supervising
			 county.
(2) The behavior change
			 plan, a component of the case plan, will:
(a)
			 Identify interventions, supervision strategies, programming, treatment, and
			 educational or employment activities that are appropriate to the adult on
			 supervision's strengths and needs;
(b) Promote positive change and assist in
			 developing pro-social behaviors;
(c) Be built in collaboration with the adult
			 on supervision;
(d) Be completed in
			 the Offender Management System;
(e)
			 Contain or identify:
(A) Primary criminogenic
			 need(s);
(B) Stage of
			 change;
(C) Prioritized goals based
			 upon assessments such as the Level of Service/Case Management Inventory
			 (LS/CMI), Women's Risk Need Assessment (WRNA), Stable-2007 or Acute-2007 and
			 Static 99R, Ontario Domestic Assault Risk Assessment (ODARA), mental health
			 status, or any other instruments assessing need or risk to recidivate;
			 and
(D) Desired outcomes for each
			 goal;
(f) Identify
			 strengths and weaknesses; and
(g)
			 Include interventions or tasks linking the adult on supervision to the
			 appropriate services that:
(A) Are specific,
			 measurable, achievable, and realistic;
(B) Are time specific and should not be
			 identified as a range (for example, 30-60 days) or as an unspecified period of
			 time (for example, as needed);
(C)
			 Identify who is responsible for accomplishing the interventions or
			 tasks;
(D) Are culturally specific
			 or gender responsive whenever possible; and
(E) Prioritize completion dates.
Oregon Administrative Rules › Chapter 291 - DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS › Division 78 - COMMUNITY CASE MANAGEMENT › Section 291-078-0031 - Validation and Evaluation

Current through Register Vol. 63, No. 7, July 1, 2024
(1) The
			 Department of Corrections will perform periodic validation to the Public Safety
			 Checklist to ensure that the tool is predicting risk within acceptable
			 ranges.
(2) Each agency is
			 responsible for quality assurance measures within their county.
(a) A sample of case plans should be reviewed
			 by supervisors a minimum of every six months for high and medium cases and as
			 needed for all other cases;
(b)
			 Internal quality assurance measures such as peer review and supervisor audits
			 should be used to maximize consistency and reliability of case management
			 tasks. These reviews should be conducted on a regular basis as determined by
			 the agency.
(c) Internal quality
			 assurance may include:
(A) Spot checks of
			 assessments, which may include the Level of Service/Case Management Inventory
			 (LS/CMI), Women's Risk Need Assessment (WRNA), Stable-2007 or Acute-2007 and
			 Static 99R (as referenced in this rule division);
(B) Review of case plan development and
			 maintenance;
(C) Observation,
			 review, and feedback of Level of Service/Case Management Inventory (LS/CMI) or
			 Women's Risk Need Assessment (WRNA) scores, interviews, and supporting
			 documentation (as referenced in this rule division);
(D) Proper use of supervision
			 overrides;
(E) Accurate and
			 appropriate case documentation; or
(F) Adherence to case plan policies and
			 procedures.
(d) External
			 quality assurance measures, including peer review and formal audits, may be
			 used to ensure a statewide case management practice.
Oregon Administrative Rules › Chapter 291 - DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS › Division 79 - SHARED INFORMATION SYSTEM › Section 291-079-0030 - Repealed

Current through Register Vol. 63, No. 7, July 1, 2024
Stat. Auth.: ORS
				  179.040, ORS
				  329.965, ORS
				  423.020, ORS
				  423.030 & ORS
				  423.075
Stats. Implemented: ORS
				  179.040, ORS
				  329.965, ORS
				  423.020, ORS
				  423.030 & ORS
				  423.075