reglab/statecodes huggingface dataset:
North Carolina Administrative Code › Title 01 - ADMINISTRATION › Chapter 30 - STATE CONSTRUCTION › Subchapter B - NORTH CAROLINA CAPITAL BUILDING AUTHORITY › Section 30B .0102 - REPEALED - AGENCIES UNDER THE AUTHORITY

Current through Register Vol. 39, No. 2, July 15, 2024
Authority
				  G.S.
				  129-42.1;
Eff. February 27,
				  1979;
Repealed Eff. October 1,
				  1984.
North Carolina Administrative Code › Title 01 - ADMINISTRATION › Chapter 30 - STATE CONSTRUCTION › Subchapter B - NORTH CAROLINA CAPITAL BUILDING AUTHORITY › Section 30B .0103-.0104

Current through Register Vol. 39, No. 2, July 15, 2024
Authority G.S. Chapter
				  129, Article 7;
Eff. February 27, 1979;
Repealed Eff.
				  October 1, 1984.
North Carolina Administrative Code › Title 01 - ADMINISTRATION › Chapter 30 - STATE CONSTRUCTION › Subchapter B - NORTH CAROLINA CAPITAL BUILDING AUTHORITY › Section 30B .0105 - REPEALED - SELECTION OF ARCHITECTS: ENGINEERS AND OTHER CONSULTANTS

Current through Register Vol. 39, No. 2, July 15, 2024
Authority
				  G.S.
				  129-42;
Eff. October
				  1,1984;
Repealed Eff. January 1,
				  1988.
North Carolina Administrative Code › Title 01 - ADMINISTRATION › Chapter 30 - STATE CONSTRUCTION › Subchapter B - NORTH CAROLINA CAPITAL BUILDING AUTHORITY › Section 30B .0106 - REPEALED - APPROVAL OF CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS

Current through Register Vol. 39, No. 2, July 15, 2024
Authority
				  G.S.
				  129-42;
				  143-341;
Eff. October
				  1, 1984;
Repealed Eff. June 1,
				  1986.
North Carolina Administrative Code › Title 01 - ADMINISTRATION › Chapter 30 - STATE CONSTRUCTION › Subchapter B - NORTH CAROLINA CAPITAL BUILDING AUTHORITY › Section 30B .0107 - REPEALED - ADVERTISEMENT

Current through Register Vol. 39, No. 2, July 15, 2024
Authority
				  G.S.
				  129-42;
Eff. October 1,
				  1984;
Repealed Eff. January 1,
				  1988.
North Carolina Administrative Code › Title 01 - ADMINISTRATION › Chapter 30 - STATE CONSTRUCTION › Subchapter C - ENERGY DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY › Section .0100 - GENERAL PROVISIONS › Section 30C .0101-.0103

Current through Register Vol. 39, No. 2, July 15, 2024
Authority
					 G.S.
					 159F-1;
					 159F-4(a),(c);
Eff. August 1, 1984;
Repealed Eff. June 1,
					 1986.
North Carolina Administrative Code › Title 01 - ADMINISTRATION › Chapter 30 - STATE CONSTRUCTION › Subchapter C - ENERGY DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY › Section .0100 - GENERAL PROVISIONS › Section 30C .0104-.0105

Current through Register Vol. 39, No. 2, July 15, 2024
Authority
					 G.S.
					 159F-4(c);
					 159F-5(a)(1) through
					 (a)(16);
					 159F-6;
					 159F-7(c);
					 159F-8;
Eff. August
					 1, 1984;
Repealed Eff. December 1,
					 2012.
North Carolina Administrative Code › Title 01 - ADMINISTRATION › Chapter 30 - STATE CONSTRUCTION › Subchapter C - ENERGY DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY › Section .0200 - RULEMAKING AND ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING PROCEDURES › Section 30C .0201 - REPEALED - RULE-MAKING AND ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING PROCEDURES

Current through Register Vol. 39, No. 2, July 15, 2024
Authority
					 G.S.
					 150B-11;
					 150B-14; 159F;
Eff.
					 August 1, 1984;
Repealed Eff. December 1,
					 2012.
North Carolina Administrative Code › Title 01 - ADMINISTRATION › Chapter 30 - STATE CONSTRUCTION › Subchapter D - STATE BUILDING COMMISSION DESIGNER AND CONSULTANT SELECTION POLICY › Section .0100 - GENERAL PROVISIONS › Section 30D .0101 - AUTHORITY

Current through Register Vol. 39, No. 2, July 15, 2024
The State Building Commission, hereinafter referred to as
					 SBC, is a statutory body, empowered by Public Law to perform a multiplicity of
					 duties with regard to the State's Capital Facilities Development and Management
					 Program. In the specific area of state capital improvement project design
					 selection, the SBC is empowered to adopt rules establishing standard procedures
					 and criteria to assure that the designer selected for each state capital
					 improvement project and the consultant selected for planning and studies of an
					 architectural and engineering nature associated with a capital improvement
					 project or a future capital improvement project has the qualifications and
					 experience necessary for that capital improvement project or the proposed
					 planning or study project. The SBC is responsible and accountable for the final
					 selection of the designer and the final selection of the consultant. The
					 exceptions are The University of North Carolina and the General Assembly which
					 shall be responsible and accountable for the final selection of designers and
					 the final selection of consultants for capital projects in which they are the
					 funded agencies.
Authority
					 G.S.
					 143-135.25;
					 143-135.26;
Eff.
					 January 1, 1988;
Amended Eff. May 1, 1990;
Pursuant to
					 G.S.
					 150B-21.3A, rule is necessary without
					 substantive public interest Eff. July 22,
					 2018.
North Carolina Administrative Code › Title 01 - ADMINISTRATION › Chapter 30 - STATE CONSTRUCTION › Subchapter D - STATE BUILDING COMMISSION DESIGNER AND CONSULTANT SELECTION POLICY › Section .0100 - GENERAL PROVISIONS › Section 30D .0102 - POLICY

Current through Register Vol. 39, No. 2, July 15, 2024
It is the policy of the SBC to select designers and
					 consultants for capital improvement projects as defined in
					 G.S.
					 143-135.27, based on criteria contained
					 herein and to make available to every designer and consultant duly licensed to
					 practice in North Carolina, the opportunity to be considered for providing
					 professional services for those departments and agencies under its
					 jurisdiction. The SBC considers that the selection of competent designers and
					 consultants is vital to providing the State of North Carolina with best and
					 most appropriate facilities consistent with authorized funds. These procedures
					 are intended to provide a basis for the fair and uniform selection of designers
					 and consultants. These procedures for defined projects are intended to be
					 consistent with the 1987 N.C. Session Laws 102. Projects not covered by this
					 policy shall also be consistent with the 1987 N.C. Session Laws
					 102.
Authority
					 G.S.
					 143-135.25;
					 143-135.26;
Eff.
					 January 1, 1988;
Amended Eff. May 1, 1990;
Pursuant to
					 G.S.
					 150B-21.3A, rule is necessary without
					 substantive public interest Eff. July 22,
					 2018.
North Carolina Administrative Code › Title 01 - ADMINISTRATION › Chapter 30 - STATE CONSTRUCTION › Subchapter D - STATE BUILDING COMMISSION DESIGNER AND CONSULTANT SELECTION POLICY › Section .0200 - PROJECT INFORMATION › Section 30D .0201 - PROJECT DESCRIPTION

Current through Register Vol. 39, No. 2, July 15, 2024
It shall be the responsibility of each Capital Projects
					 Coordinator to provide the State Construction Office with a written description
					 of the professional services desired, the program or scope of work, schedule
					 requirements, amount of authorized funds and other appropriate information for
					 each project requiring professional services. This information should be
					 provided to the State Construction Office seven days prior to the publication
					 dates of the first and fifteenth of each month for the North Carolina Purchase
					 Directory. The Capital Projects Coordinator is responsible for prompt
					 initiation of the designer or consultant selection process to enable the
					 completion of designer or consultant selection with 60 days of the date funds
					 are appropriated for a project by the General Assembly or the date of project
					 authorization by the Director of the Budget. The State Building Commission may
					 grant an exception to this requirement upon written request of the funded
					 agency if:
(1) no site was selected
				  for the project before the funds were appropriated; or
(2) funds were appropriated for advance
				  planning only.
Authority
					 G.S.
					 143-135.25;
					 143-135.26;
Eff.
					 January 1, 1988;
Amended Eff. May 1, 1990;
Pursuant to
					 G.S.
					 150B-21.3A, rule is necessary without
					 substantive public interest Eff. July 22,
					 2018.
North Carolina Administrative Code › Title 01 - ADMINISTRATION › Chapter 30 - STATE CONSTRUCTION › Subchapter D - STATE BUILDING COMMISSION DESIGNER AND CONSULTANT SELECTION POLICY › Section .0200 - PROJECT INFORMATION › Section 30D .0202 - PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENT

Current through Register Vol. 39, No. 2, July 15, 2024
Based upon project information furnished by a Capital
					 Projects Coordinator, the State Construction Office shall publish an
					 announcement of the need for professional services, a designated contact person
					 in the using agency and the closing date in the North Carolina Purchase
					 Directory. Public announcement is required prior to designer or consultant
					 selection except in the event of emergency. In the event of an emergency,
					 public announcement is not required and the procedure outlined in Rule .0302
					 (4) of this policy will be followed.
On projects, the closing date for being considered for
					 professional services shall not be less than ten days for minor projects and 15
					 days for major projects nor more than 21 days from date of publication in the
					 Purchase Directory.
A letter of interest for each project must be received by
					 the contact person prior to a designer's being considered for professional
					 services.
Authority
					 G.S.
					 143-135.25;
					 143-135.26;
Eff.
					 January 1, 1988;
Amended Eff. May 1, 1990;
Pursuant to
					 G.S.
					 150B-21.3A, rule is necessary without
					 substantive public interest Eff. July 22,
					 2018.
North Carolina Administrative Code › Title 01 - ADMINISTRATION › Chapter 30 - STATE CONSTRUCTION › Subchapter D - STATE BUILDING COMMISSION DESIGNER AND CONSULTANT SELECTION POLICY › Section .0300 - SELECTION OF DESIGNERS OR CONSULTANTS › Section 30D .0301 - DESIGNER OR CONSULTANT QUALIFICATIONS

Current through Register Vol. 39, No. 2, July 15, 2024
All designers or consultants desiring to provide
					 professional services shall file with the State Construction Office a Federal
					 Standard Form 254 by January 1 of each year. Qualifications may be submitted
					 any time during the year; but, during January of each year, all submissions
					 older than 12 months may be destroyed.
In response to a specific project announcement, the
					 designer or consultant may submit a new or updated Standard Form 254 or other
					 information requested by the State Construction Office. Designer or consultant
					 qualifications must be on file or submitted to the State Construction Office
					 prior to being considered by the pre-selection committee.
Authority
					 G.S.
					 143-135.25;
					 143-135.26;
Eff.
					 January 1, 1988;
Amended Eff. May 1, 1990;
Pursuant to
					 G.S.
					 150B-21.3A, rule is necessary without
					 substantive public interest Eff. July 22,
					 2018.
North Carolina Administrative Code › Title 01 - ADMINISTRATION › Chapter 30 - STATE CONSTRUCTION › Subchapter D - STATE BUILDING COMMISSION DESIGNER AND CONSULTANT SELECTION POLICY › Section .0300 - SELECTION OF DESIGNERS OR CONSULTANTS › Section 30D .0303 - SELECTING CRITERIA

Current through Register Vol. 39, No. 2, July 15, 2024
In selecting the three firms to be presented to the SBC,
					 the pre-selection committee should take into consideration such factors
					 as:
(1) Specialized or appropriate
				  expertise in the type of project.
(2) Past performance on similar
				  projects.
(3) Adequate staff and
				  proposed design or consultant team for the project.
(4) Current workload and State projects
				  awarded.
(5) Proposed design
				  approach for the project including design team and consultants.
(6) Recent experience with project costs and
				  schedules.
(7) Construction
				  administration capabilities.
(8)
				  Proximity to and familiarity with the area where project is located.
(9) Record of successfully completed projects
				  without major legal or technical problems.
(10) Other factors that may be appropriate
				  for the project.
Authority
					 G.S.
					 143-135.25;
					 143-135.26;
Eff.
					 January 1, 1988;
Amended Eff. May 1, 1990;
Pursuant to
					 G.S.
					 150B-21.3A, rule is necessary without
					 substantive public interest Eff. July 22,
					 2018.
North Carolina Administrative Code › Title 01 - ADMINISTRATION › Chapter 30 - STATE CONSTRUCTION › Subchapter D - STATE BUILDING COMMISSION DESIGNER AND CONSULTANT SELECTION POLICY › Section .0300 - SELECTION OF DESIGNERS OR CONSULTANTS › Section 30D .0304 - DESIGNER OR CONSULTANT SELECTION FOR UNC SYSTEM PROJECTS

Current through Register Vol. 39, No. 2, July 15, 2024
In selecting designers or consultants for its projects, the
					 UNC system shall comply with the preceding policies and pre-selection
					 procedures, except that pre-selection committees need not include a
					 representative of the State Construction Office. The UNC system shall establish
					 its own procedures for final designer or consultant selection. These procedures
					 shall correspond in form to those established below for other than UNC system
					 projects and shall be filed with and approved by the SBC.
Authority
					 G.S.
					 143-135.25;
					 143-135.26;
Eff.
					 January 1, 1988;
Amended Eff. May 1, 1990;
Pursuant to
					 G.S.
					 150B-21.3A, rule is necessary without
					 substantive public interest Eff. July 22,
					 2018.
North Carolina Administrative Code › Title 01 - ADMINISTRATION › Chapter 30 - STATE CONSTRUCTION › Subchapter D - STATE BUILDING COMMISSION DESIGNER AND CONSULTANT SELECTION POLICY › Section .0300 - SELECTION OF DESIGNERS OR CONSULTANTS › Section 30D .0305 - DESIGNER/CONSULTANT SELECTION FOR OTHER THAN UNC SYS PROJECTS

Current through Register Vol. 39, No. 2, July 15, 2024
Upon receipt of a letter from the Capital Projects
					 Coordinator listing three firms in priority order along with recommendations
					 and pre-selection information, as requested by the SBC, the Secretary of SBC,
					 upon determination that all information has been submitted, will place the
					 request for consideration on the agenda for the next SBC meeting.
The Capital Projects Coordinator shall make a report to the
					 SBC outlining the procedures that were followed and justification for the
					 priority list of three firms. Upon a determination by the SBC that the standard
					 procedures and criteria have been properly followed, the SBC will:
(1) Select the firms in the priority order
				  recommended by the state or agency; or
(2) Select the firms in a different priority
				  order from that recommended by the funded agency and give justification for
				  such selection; or
(3) Request a
				  new priority list and give justification for such request.
Authority
					 G.S.
					 143-315.25;
					 143-135.26;
Eff.
					 January 1, 1988;
Pursuant to
					 G.S.
					 150B-21.3A, rule is necessary without
					 substantive public interest Eff. July 22,
					 2018.
North Carolina Administrative Code › Title 01 - ADMINISTRATION › Chapter 30 - STATE CONSTRUCTION › Subchapter D - STATE BUILDING COMMISSION DESIGNER AND CONSULTANT SELECTION POLICY › Section .0300 - SELECTION OF DESIGNERS OR CONSULTANTS › Section 30D .0306 - CONTRACT NEGOTIATION

Current through Register Vol. 39, No. 2, July 15, 2024
After the three have been notified of the selection action
					 by The University of North Carolina or the SBC, a representative from the State
					 Construction Office, the Capital Projects Coordinator, and a representative
					 from the using agency will discuss with the selected designer or consultant
					 appropriate information about the project, the scope of services to be provided
					 and the state design/review/construction process.
The State Construction Office will request in writing a
					 detailed fee proposal from the selected designer or consultant. The State
					 Construction Office in coordination with the Capital Projects Coordinator and
					 the using agency will attempt to negotiate a fair and equitable fee consistent
					 with the project program and the professional services required for the
					 specific project. In the event a fee cannot be agreed upon, the State
					 Construction Office shall terminate the negotiations and shall repeat the
					 notification and negotiation process with the next ranked firm on the selection
					 list. In the event a fee cannot be agreed upon with the second-ranked designer
					 or consultant, the process will be repeated with the third-ranked designer or
					 consultant. If a fee still cannot be agreed to, the SBC shall review the
					 history of negotiations and make appropriate determinations including program
					 adjustments so as to lead to a negotiated contract with one of the original
					 three firms selected. Such renegotiation with the firms shall be carried out in
					 the original selection order, or call for the Capital Projects Coordinator to
					 submit another list of three firms in priority order to the SBC or to the UNC
					 system. The negotiation process will continue until a fee has been determined
					 that is agreed to by the State Construction Office, the using agency, and the
					 designer or consultant. Annual contracts are subject to special management
					 procedures described herein. Normally, the initial fee negotiation for this
					 type of work will involve mutual agreement in unit costs for time, materials,
					 and overhead; a final lump sum price for each discrete project will be
					 negotiated in advance as each project is ordered.
Following execution of the contract, the State Construction
					 Office will publish in the North Carolina Purchase Directory the list of three
					 firms selected in priority order, the firm to be contracted with, and the fee
					 negotiated.
Authority
					 G.S.
					 143-135.25;
					 143-135.26;
Eff.
					 January 1, 1988;
Amended Eff. May 1, 1990;
Pursuant to
					 G.S.
					 150B-21.3A, rule is necessary without
					 substantive public interest Eff. July 22,
					 2018.
North Carolina Administrative Code › Title 01 - ADMINISTRATION › Chapter 30 - STATE CONSTRUCTION › Subchapter E - STATE BUILDING COMMISSION DESIGNER OR CONSULTANT EVALUATION PROCEDURES › Section .0100 - GENERAL PROVISIONS › Section 30E .0101 - AUTHORITY

Current through Register Vol. 39, No. 2, July 15, 2024
The State Building Commission, hereinafter referred to as
					 SBC, is a statutory body, empowered by Public Law to perform a multiplicity of
					 duties with regard to the State's Capital Facilities development and management
					 program. In the specific area of state capital improvement project designer and
					 consultant evaluation, the SBC is empowered to develop procedures for
					 accomplishment of such evaluation.
Authority
					 G.S.
					 143-135.25;
					 143-135.26;
Eff.
					 October 1. 1988;
Amended Eff. May 1, 1990;
Pursuant to
					 G.S.
					 150B-21.3A, rule is necessary without
					 substantive public interest Eff. July 22,
					 2018.
North Carolina Administrative Code › Title 01 - ADMINISTRATION › Chapter 30 - STATE CONSTRUCTION › Subchapter E - STATE BUILDING COMMISSION DESIGNER OR CONSULTANT EVALUATION PROCEDURES › Section .0100 - GENERAL PROVISIONS › Section 30E .0102 - POLICY

Current through Register Vol. 39, No. 2, July 15, 2024
It is the policy of the SBC to evaluate designers for
					 capital improvement projects as defined in
					 G.S.
					 143-135.27 based on criteria contained
					 herein. Further, it is considered of paramount importance that every state
					 capital improvement project receive a professional design which is timely, of
					 highest professional quality, and in keeping with the project scope. It is to
					 this end that individual designer's or consultant's performance on state
					 capital improvement projects should be fairly and consistently evaluated and
					 used as a factor in designer or consultant selection for future
					 work.
Authority
					 G.S.
					 143-135.25;
					 143-135.26;
Eff.
					 October 1, 1988;
Amended Eff. May 1, 1990;
Pursuant to
					 G.S.
					 150B-21.3A, rule is necessary without
					 substantive public interest Eff. July 22,
					 2018.
North Carolina Administrative Code › Title 01 - ADMINISTRATION › Chapter 30 - STATE CONSTRUCTION › Subchapter E - STATE BUILDING COMMISSION DESIGNER OR CONSULTANT EVALUATION PROCEDURES › Section .0200 - PROJECT INFORMATION › Section 30E .0201 - PROJECT DESCRIPTION

Current through Register Vol. 39, No. 2, July 15, 2024
It shall be the responsibility of each Capital Projects
					 Coordinator, for each Capital Improvements project as defined in
					 G.S.
					 143-135.27 requiring professional services,
					 to provide the State Construction Office with a written description of the
					 professional services desired, the scope of work, schedule requirements, amount
					 of authorized funds and other appropriate information. Particular emphasis will
					 be placed on a determination as to whether the designer's or consultant's
					 services are to include items such as programming, modeling, special
					 presentations or other requirements beyond specific facility design. This
					 requirement data shall be incorporated in the designer's or consultant's
					 professional services contract and will serve as key elements against which the
					 designer's or consultant's performance will be evaluated.
Authority
					 G.S.
					 143-135.25;
					 143-135.26;
Eff.
					 October 1, 1988;
Amended Eff. May 1, 1990;
Pursuant to
					 G.S.
					 150B-21.3A, rule is necessary without
					 substantive public interest Eff. July 22,
					 2018.
North Carolina Administrative Code › Title 01 - ADMINISTRATION › Chapter 30 - STATE CONSTRUCTION › Subchapter E - STATE BUILDING COMMISSION DESIGNER OR CONSULTANT EVALUATION PROCEDURES › Section .0200 - PROJECT INFORMATION › Section 30E .0202 - DESIGN CONTRACT

Current through Register Vol. 39, No. 2, July 15, 2024
It shall be the responsibility of the Office of State
					 Construction to ensure that both the Capital Projects Coordinator and the
					 designer or consultant have a clear mutual understanding of design requirements
					 for the project and key elements of these requirements are included in the
					 professional services contract between the agency and the designer or
					 consultant.
Authority
					 G.S.
					 143-135.25;
					 143-135.26;
Eff.
					 October 1, 1988;
Amended Eff. May 1, 1990;
Pursuant to
					 G.S.
					 150B-21.3A, rule is necessary without
					 substantive public interest Eff. July 22,
					 2018.
North Carolina Administrative Code › Title 01 - ADMINISTRATION › Chapter 30 - STATE CONSTRUCTION › Subchapter E - STATE BUILDING COMMISSION DESIGNER OR CONSULTANT EVALUATION PROCEDURES › Section .0300 - EVALUATION OF DESIGNERS OR CONSULTANTS › Section 30E .0302 - OVERALL JOB PERFORMANCE

Current through Register Vol. 39, No. 2, July 15, 2024
The Capital Projects Coordinator shall determine the
					 designer's or consultant's overall performance for the completed project. The
					 overall rating is intended to reflect the effectiveness of the design in
					 achieving the predetermined project scope in a timely, cost effective manner.
					 The evaluation shall encompass the designer's or consultant's management
					 approach to the project including cooperation of the designer's staff,
					 communication with the Capital Projects Coordinator and Owner's representative,
					 timeliness of action, and performance of consultants. The Capital Projects
					 Coordinator shall invite input from the Owner's representative and the State
					 Construction Office. All prime contractors shall be offered the opportunity to
					 provide an assessment of the designer at job completion. The Capital Projects
					 Coordinator shall be responsible for the final overall rating. This summary
					 evaluation shall not necessarily reflect a precise numerical averaging of
					 scores for the Pre-design, Design, and Bidding-Construction phases but will be
					 generally representative of those scores. To be timely and useful, designer
					 evaluation data will be accumulated within 30 days of submission of the final
					 report. Prior to completion of the final designer evaluation, the Capital
					 Projects Coordinator shall submit the proposed evaluation to the designer for
					 comment. Comments received from designers or consultants shall be considered by
					 the Capital Projects Coordinator. At this stage, the Capital Projects
					 Coordinator shall prepare the final designer or consultant evaluation and
					 provide a copy to the designer or consultant. The form approved by the SBC
					 shall be used for this purpose.
Authority
					 G.S.
					 143-135.25;
					 143-135.26;
Eff.
					 October 1, 1988;
Amended Eff. May 1, 1990;
Pursuant to
					 G.S.
					 150B-21.3A, rule is necessary without
					 substantive public interest Eff. July 22,
					 2018.
North Carolina Administrative Code › Title 01 - ADMINISTRATION › Chapter 30 - STATE CONSTRUCTION › Subchapter E - STATE BUILDING COMMISSION DESIGNER OR CONSULTANT EVALUATION PROCEDURES › Section .0300 - EVALUATION OF DESIGNERS OR CONSULTANTS › Section 30E .0303 - POST OCCUPANCY EVALUATION

Current through Register Vol. 39, No. 2, July 15, 2024
The designer evaluation process allows for a second
					 evaluation to be conducted within 36 months of the completion of a capital
					 project if design-related latent defects are discovered. A separate procedure
					 of the State Building Commission may require a formal post-occupancy evaluation
					 within 12 months of a building completion. The data from the 12 month
					 post-occupancy evaluation can be used as a substitute for the follow-up
					 designer evaluation if the Capital Projects Coordinator so
					 determines.
Authority
					 G.S.
					 143-135.25;
					 143-135.26;
Eff.
					 October 1, 1988;
Pursuant to
					 G.S.
					 150B-21.3A, rule is necessary without
					 substantive public interest Eff. July 22,
					 2018.
North Carolina Administrative Code › Title 01 - ADMINISTRATION › Chapter 30 - STATE CONSTRUCTION › Subchapter E - STATE BUILDING COMMISSION DESIGNER OR CONSULTANT EVALUATION PROCEDURES › Section .0300 - EVALUATION OF DESIGNERS OR CONSULTANTS › Section 30E .0304 - INTERIM DESIGNER OR CONSULTANT EVALUATION

Current through Register Vol. 39, No. 2, July 15, 2024
The designer or consultant may request preparation of an
					 interim evaluation form by the Capital Projects Coordinator or the Coordinator
					 may elect to prepare an interim evaluation if so desired. This interim
					 evaluation is intended to reflect performance to date and should be used as a
					 guidance device for correction of performance prior to the final
					 evaluation.
Authority
					 G.S.
					 143-135.25;
					 143-135.26;
Eff.
					 October 1, 1988;
Amended Eff. May 1, 1990;
Pursuant to
					 G.S.
					 150B-21.3A, rule is necessary without
					 substantive public interest Eff. July 22,
					 2018.
North Carolina Administrative Code › Title 01 - ADMINISTRATION › Chapter 30 - STATE CONSTRUCTION › Subchapter E - STATE BUILDING COMMISSION DESIGNER OR CONSULTANT EVALUATION PROCEDURES › Section .0300 - EVALUATION OF DESIGNERS OR CONSULTANTS › Section 30E .0305 - SUBMISSION OF FINAL REPORT

Current through Register Vol. 39, No. 2, July 15, 2024
The Capital Projects Coordinator shall submit the completed
					 final evaluation to the Office of State Construction with a copy to the
					 designer or consultant. The designer or consultant shall have the opportunity
					 to comment on the evaluation to the Office of State Construction with a copy to
					 the Capital Projects Coordinator. Such comments on the final evaluation shall
					 become a part of the final evaluation record. It is imperative that the final
					 designer or consultant evaluation be completed and presented to the State
					 Construction Office for all capital projects within 60 days of the final
					 report. If the evaluation is not completed within the prescribed time frame,
					 the State Building Commission may elect to process no further design awards for
					 an agency until the evaluation is complete.
Authority
					 G.S.
					 143-135.25;
					 143-135.26;
Eff.
					 October 1, 1988;
Amended Eff. May 1, 1990;
Pursuant to
					 G.S.
					 150B-21.3A, rule is necessary without
					 substantive public interest Eff. July 22,
					 2018.
North Carolina Administrative Code › Title 01 - ADMINISTRATION › Chapter 30 - STATE CONSTRUCTION › Subchapter E - STATE BUILDING COMMISSION DESIGNER OR CONSULTANT EVALUATION PROCEDURES › Section .0300 - EVALUATION OF DESIGNERS OR CONSULTANTS › Section 30E .0306 - REPORT COMPILATION

Current through Register Vol. 39, No. 2, July 15, 2024
The Office of State Construction will be responsible for
					 maintaining designer or consultant evaluation data. The data maintained shall
					 be on an individual job basis and also cumulative by the designer or
					 consultant. Data will be made available on request to individual designer or
					 consultant preselection committees. The data maintained by the State
					 Construction Office will reflect performance history for a period of five
					 years. All evaluation data on completed projects in excess of five years of age
					 will be removed from State Construction Office files and will not be used as a
					 factor in the cumulative evaluation.
Authority
					 G.S.
					 143-135.25;
					 143-135.26;
Eff.
					 October 1, 1988;
Amended Eff. May 1, 1990;
Pursuant to
					 G.S.
					 150B-21.3A, rule is necessary without
					 substantive public interest Eff. July 22,
					 2018.
North Carolina Administrative Code › Title 01 - ADMINISTRATION › Chapter 30 - STATE CONSTRUCTION › Subchapter E - STATE BUILDING COMMISSION DESIGNER OR CONSULTANT EVALUATION PROCEDURES › Section .0400 - POST- EVALUATION PROCEDURES › Section 30E .0401 - AWARDS PROGRAM

Current through Register Vol. 39, No. 2, July 15, 2024
Capital Projects Coordinators who consider that designer
					 performance on a completed Capital Improvement Project merits special
					 recognition may nominate the designer for a certificate of Design Merit.
					 Nominations will be made by the Capital Projects Coordinator to the Office of
					 State Construction which will screen the nominees and will in turn make
					 appropriate recommendations to the State Building Commission. The State
					 Construction Office may also initiate award recommendations. The SCB will
					 consider all nominations and make final approval of all awards. The State
					 Building Commission shall arrange for presentation of the certificates at a
					 suitable ceremony during a time and place of its own choosing; however, these
					 presentations will normally be made during the annual State Construction
					 Conference. The State Construction Office shall provide staff support to the
					 State Building Commission for this program.
Authority
					 G.S.
					 143-135.25;
					 143-135.26;
Eff.
					 October 1, 1988;
Pursuant to
					 G.S.
					 150B-21.3A, rule is necessary without
					 substantive public interest Eff. July 22,
					 2018.
North Carolina Administrative Code › Title 01 - ADMINISTRATION › Chapter 30 - STATE CONSTRUCTION › Subchapter E - STATE BUILDING COMMISSION DESIGNER OR CONSULTANT EVALUATION PROCEDURES › Section .0400 - POST- EVALUATION PROCEDURES › Section 30E .0402 - APPEALS OF ASSIGNED EVALUATIONS

Current through Register Vol. 39, No. 2, July 15, 2024
If a design or consultant firm considers that the assigned
					 evaluation is improper and the opportunity to provide rebuttal comments for the
					 record is insufficient to resolve the assigned rating, the designer or
					 consultant may appeal the rating to the Office of State Construction. The State
					 Construction Office will appoint and convene a rating panel of three
					 professional State employees of which at least one member is a licensed
					 professional architect or engineer to hear the appeal and render a decision.
					 The hearing shall involve at a minimum the Capital Projects Coordinator and the
					 Owner's representative as well as representatives of the designer or consultant
					 who shall appear before the panel and which is open to the public. The State
					 Construction Office hearing panel shall issue a report to the State Building
					 Commission of the hearing and the decision reached. If the Capital Projects
					 Coordinator or designer desires further recourse, the State Construction Office
					 panel decision may be formally appealed to the Office of Administrative
					 Hearings pursuant to N.C.G.S. 150B.
Authority
					 G.S.
					 143-135.25;
					 143-135.26;
Eff.
					 October 1, 1988;
Amended Eff. May 1, 1990;
Pursuant to
					 G.S.
					 150B-21.3A, rule is necessary without
					 substantive public interest Eff. July 22,
					 2018.
North Carolina Administrative Code › Title 01 - ADMINISTRATION › Chapter 30 - STATE CONSTRUCTION › Subchapter F - STATE BUILDING COMMISSION CONTRACTOR EVALUATION PROCEDURES › Section .0100 - GENERAL PROVISIONS › Section 30F .0101 - AUTHORITY

Current through Register Vol. 39, No. 2, July 15, 2024
The State Building Commission, hereinafter referred to as
					 SBC, is a statutory body, empowered by Public Law to perform a multiplicity of
					 duties with regard to the State's Capital Facilities development and management
					 program. In the specific area of state capital improvement project contractor
					 evaluation, the SBC is empowered to develop procedures for accomplishment of
					 such evaluation.
Authority
					 G.S.
					 143-135.26(4);
Eff. January 1, 1992;
Pursuant to
					 G.S.
					 150B-21.3A, rule is necessary without
					 substantive public interest Eff. July 22,
					 2018.
North Carolina Administrative Code › Title 01 - ADMINISTRATION › Chapter 30 - STATE CONSTRUCTION › Subchapter F - STATE BUILDING COMMISSION CONTRACTOR EVALUATION PROCEDURES › Section .0100 - GENERAL PROVISIONS › Section 30F .0102 - POLICY

Current through Register Vol. 39, No. 2, July 15, 2024
It is the policy of the SBC to evaluate the work performed
					 by prime contractors for capital improvement projects based on criteria
					 contained herein. Further, it is considered of paramount importance that every
					 state capital improvement project be constructed of a level of quality and
					 adherence to a time schedule in keeping with the contract plans and
					 specifications. It is to this end that individual prime contractor's
					 performance on state capital improvement projects should be fairly and
					 consistently evaluated and such evaluations used as a factor in determining
					 qualifications of prime contractors to bid on future state capital improvement
					 projects. If such evaluations lead to a determination that the level of
					 performance by a contractor so warrants, the contractor may be disqualified
					 from bidding on state capital improvement projects for a specified period of
					 time.
Authority
					 G.S.
					 143-135.26(4);
Eff. December 1, 1991;
Pursuant to
					 G.S.
					 150B-21.3A, rule is necessary without
					 substantive public interest Eff. July 22,
					 2018.
North Carolina Administrative Code › Title 01 - ADMINISTRATION › Chapter 30 - STATE CONSTRUCTION › Subchapter F - STATE BUILDING COMMISSION CONTRACTOR EVALUATION PROCEDURES › Section .0200 - PROJECT AND CONTRACT INFORMATION › Section 30F .0201 - PROJECT DESCRIPTION

Current through Register Vol. 39, No. 2, July 15, 2024
(a) It shall be the
				  responsibility of each Capital Projects Coordinator, for each Capital
				  Improvements project as defined in
				  G.S.
				  143-135.27 requiring professional services,
				  to provide the State Construction Office with a written description of the
				  professional services desired, the scope of work, schedule requirements, amount
				  of authorized funds and other appropriate information. This phase of the
				  project development is intended to convey project information.
(b) It shall be the joint responsibility of
				  the Capital Projects Coordinator and Office of State Construction, to the best
				  of their belief and knowledge, to ensure that the contract plans and
				  specifications accurately reflect the description of the work to be performed
				  by each prime contractor. This phase of the project development, intended to
				  convey contract information, which is a sub-set of project information, is
				  critical as the evaluation of the prime contractor's performance will depend in
				  part on the contract requirements clearly delineating the work to be performed
				  and establishing an appropriate time frame for contract completion.
Authority
					 G.S.
					 143-135.26(4);
Eff. December 1, 1991;
Pursuant to
					 G.S.
					 150B-21.3A, rule is necessary without
					 substantive public interest Eff. July 22,
					 2018.
North Carolina Administrative Code › Title 01 - ADMINISTRATION › Chapter 30 - STATE CONSTRUCTION › Subchapter F - STATE BUILDING COMMISSION CONTRACTOR EVALUATION PROCEDURES › Section .0200 - PROJECT AND CONTRACT INFORMATION › Section 30F .0202 - PRE BID CONFERENCES AND SITE REVIEWS

Current through Register Vol. 39, No. 2, July 15, 2024
(a)
				  The Capital Projects Coordinator shall evaluate each assigned project to
				  determine if the complexity of a project warrants conducting one or more
				  pre-bid conferences including site visits. The Capital Projects Coordinator
				  shall be responsible for ensuring that the owner's representatives are familiar
				  with the contract requirements and the consequences of the construction work on
				  the owner.
(b) This step is
				  included as attempts may be made by the owner to request that additional tasks
				  be performed by the contractor to meet the owner's special requirements without
				  the capital projects coordinator's and designer's knowledge and the contract
				  plans and specifications do not contain any provision for these special
				  requirements. Development of any special provisions and a general understanding
				  of the contract requirements are a vital part of the contract process prior to
				  the opening of bids.
Authority
					 G.S.
					 143-135.26(4);
Eff. January 1, 1992;
Pursuant to
					 G.S.
					 150B-21.3A, rule is necessary without
					 substantive public interest Eff. July 22,
					 2018.
North Carolina Administrative Code › Title 01 - ADMINISTRATION › Chapter 30 - STATE CONSTRUCTION › Subchapter F - STATE BUILDING COMMISSION CONTRACTOR EVALUATION PROCEDURES › Section .0300 - EVALUATION OF CONTRACTORS › Section 30F .0301 - DEFINITIONS

Current through Register Vol. 39, No. 2, July 15, 2024
(a) "Pre-Bid Phase"
				  is the phase of the contract work prior to receipt of bids. If the pre-bid or
				  site visit meeting is utilized, the interest or participation by a contractor
				  in this phase of the construction process does demonstrate a good faith effort
				  by a prime contractor to understand the project requirements and resolve
				  differences prior to bid opening. For this reason, participation by contractors
				  in this phase does clearly demonstrate an effort on the contractor's part to
				  facilitate the construction process and may, therefore, be evaluated. The
				  Capital Projects Coordinator must be involved in this process.
(b) "Contract Award Phase" is a period during
				  the award process and includes but is not limited to submission of all
				  documents required for award, including Minority Business Enterprise (MBE)
				  data, bonds, insurance documentation, and the executed contract
				  documents.
(c) "Construction Phase"
				  is the most critical portion of the work and includes not only field execution
				  of the work but also, as a minimum: project/job site mobilization; shop drawing
				  processing; development of job schedule; coordination/cooperation with other
				  contractors, using agency and designer as appropriate; coordination of the
				  activities of sub-contractors; field supervision; prosecution of the works;
				  adherence to quality standards; and timeliness of response to field conditions
				  or modified job requirements including change order management. The Capital
				  Projects Coordinator must be involved in the construction phase to the degree
				  that meaningful evaluations can be prepared for this phase; this involves
				  Capital Projects Coordinator's attendance at monthly progress meetings or more
				  often if necessary. Attendance at and participation in scheduled progress
				  meetings by prime contractors shall be evaluated; an evaluation shall be
				  performed for contractors who have been assigned project coordinator duties as
				  outlined in the contract.
(d) "Post
				  Construction Phase" includes but is not limited to the development and
				  completion of the job punch list, assembly of all warranty information and
				  product brochures, and provision of "as built" information. The Capital
				  Projects Coordinator must maintain continuing involvement in the project until
				  final close-out to evaluate the contractor's performance in this final
				  phase.
Authority
					 G.S.
					 143-135.26(4);
Eff. January 1, 1992;
Pursuant to
					 G.S.
					 150B-21.3A, rule is necessary without
					 substantive public interest Eff. July 22,
					 2018.
North Carolina Administrative Code › Title 01 - ADMINISTRATION › Chapter 30 - STATE CONSTRUCTION › Subchapter F - STATE BUILDING COMMISSION CONTRACTOR EVALUATION PROCEDURES › Section .0300 - EVALUATION OF CONTRACTORS › Section 30F .0303 - INTERIM CONTRACTOR EVALUATION

Current through Register Vol. 39, No. 2, July 15, 2024
The prime contractor(s) may request preparation of an
					 interim evaluation form by the Capital Projects Coordinator or the Capital
					 Projects Coordinator may elect to prepare an interim evaluation. The Capital
					 Projects Coordinator shall seek input from the project designer if an interim
					 evaluation is provided. This interim evaluation is intended to reflect
					 performance to date and should be used as a guidance device for correction of
					 performance prior to the final evaluation.
Authority
					 G.S.
					 143-135.26(4);
Eff. January 1, 1992;
Pursuant to
					 G.S.
					 150B-21.3A, rule is necessary without
					 substantive public interest Eff. July 22,
					 2018.
North Carolina Administrative Code › Title 01 - ADMINISTRATION › Chapter 30 - STATE CONSTRUCTION › Subchapter F - STATE BUILDING COMMISSION CONTRACTOR EVALUATION PROCEDURES › Section .0300 - EVALUATION OF CONTRACTORS › Section 30F .0304 - SUBMISSION OF FINAL EVALUATION

Current through Register Vol. 39, No. 2, July 15, 2024
The Capital Projects Coordinator shall submit the completed
					 final evaluation to the SCO with a copy to the prime contractor. The prime
					 contractor shall have the opportunity to comment on the evaluation to the SCO
					 with a copy to the Capital Projects Coordinator. These final evaluation
					 comments shall become a part of the final evaluation record. The final
					 contractor evaluation shall be completed and presented to the SCO within 60
					 days of the project's final acceptance. SCO will monitor the completion of all
					 required evaluations and will not close out a project on which all evaluations
					 have not been performed. If the evaluation is not completed within the
					 prescribed time frame, the SBC may advise SCO to process no further contract
					 awards for an agency until the evaluation is complete. Under such
					 circumstances, the SBC will require the Capital Projects Coordinator to appear
					 before the Commission to explain why the evaluation has not been
					 completed.
Authority
					 G.S.
					 143-135.26(4);
Eff. December 1, 1991;
Pursuant to
					 G.S.
					 150B-21.3A, rule is necessary without
					 substantive public interest Eff. July 22,
					 2018.
North Carolina Administrative Code › Title 01 - ADMINISTRATION › Chapter 30 - STATE CONSTRUCTION › Subchapter F - STATE BUILDING COMMISSION CONTRACTOR EVALUATION PROCEDURES › Section .0400 - POST EVALUATION PROCEDURES › Section 30F .0401 - POST OCCUPANCY EVALUATION

Current through Register Vol. 39, No. 2, July 15, 2024
Following project close-out, the prime contractor is often
					 required to take remedial action to correct discrepancies which fall under
					 product or construction warranty. While this phase of the project normally
					 proceeds without serious difficulty, Capital Projects Coordinators may at their
					 option, submit a special evaluation during the contract warranty period if
					 circumstances dictate. This special evaluation will involve completion of the
					 optional post-occupancy evaluation portion of the form but will not normally
					 involve re-computation of the evaluation(s) assigned for the previous four
					 phases. A new overall contractor evaluation will be assigned which will take
					 into consideration the previously assigned evaluation. If the post-occupancy
					 contractor evaluation is completed, the contractor being evaluated will be
					 afforded the same opportunity to provide input on the evaluation as was
					 provided on the evaluation made at job construction
					 completion.
Authority
					 G.S.
					 143-135.26(4);
Eff. January 1, 1992;
Pursuant to
					 G.S.
					 150B-21.3A, rule is necessary without
					 substantive public interest Eff. July 22,
					 2018.
North Carolina Administrative Code › Title 01 - ADMINISTRATION › Chapter 30 - STATE CONSTRUCTION › Subchapter F - STATE BUILDING COMMISSION CONTRACTOR EVALUATION PROCEDURES › Section .0400 - POST EVALUATION PROCEDURES › Section 30F .0402 - AWARDS PROGRAM

Current through Register Vol. 39, No. 2, July 15, 2024
Capital Projects Coordinators who determine that contractor
					 performance on a completed capital improvement project merits special
					 recognition may nominate the contractor for a Certificate of Merit. Nominations
					 will be made by the Capital Projects Coordinator to the SCO which will screen
					 the nominees and will in turn make appropriate recommendations to the SBC. The
					 SCO may also initiate award recommendations. The SBC will consider all
					 nominations and make final approval of all awards. The State Building
					 Commission shall arrange for presentation of the certificates at a suitable
					 ceremony during a time and place of its own choosing; however, these
					 presentations will normally be made during the annual State Construction
					 Conference. The SCO shall provide staff support to the State Building
					 Commission for this program.
Authority
					 G.S.
					 143-135.26(4);
Eff. December 1, 1991;
Pursuant to
					 G.S.
					 150B-21.3A, rule is necessary without
					 substantive public interest Eff. July 22,
					 2018.