reglab/statecodes huggingface dataset:
Michigan Administrative Code › Department - Environmental Quality › Air Quality Division › Part 10 - INTERMITTENT TESTING AND SAMPLING › Section R. 336.2011 - Reference test method 5B

Current through Vol. 24-12, July 15, 2024
Rule 1011. Reference test method 5B, in-stack filtration
				  method, reads as follows:
(a) The
				principle, applicability, and performance test criteria are as follows:
(i) Principle. Particulate matter is
				withdrawn isokinetically from the source and collected on solid filtering media
				maintained at stack temperature. The particulate matter mass is determined
				gravimetrically after removal of uncombined water.
(ii) Applicability. This method is applicable
				for the determination of particulate emissions from stationary sources as
				identified in table 31 of R 336.1331. The method is also applicable when
				specifically provided for in the departments rules, orders, a permit to
				install, or a permit to operate.
(iii) Performance test criteria:
(A) A performance test shall consist of a
				minimum of 3 separate samples of a specific air contaminant conducted within a
				36-hour period, unless otherwise authorized by the department. Each of the 3
				separate samples shall be obtained while the source is operating at a similar
				production level. For the purpose of determining compliance with an applicable
				emission limit, rule, or permit condition, the arithmetic mean of results of
				the 3 samples shall apply. If a sample is accidentally lost or conditions occur
				in which 1 of the 3 samples must be discontinued because of forced shutdown,
				failure of an irreplaceable portion of the sampling train, extreme
				meteorological conditions, or other circumstances beyond the owner's or
				operator's control, compliance may, upon the approval of the department, be
				determined using the arithmetic mean of the results of 2 samples.
(B) For any source that is subject to an
				emission limitation calculated to 50% excess air, the multipoint, integrated
				sampling procedure of R 336.2004(1)(c) shall be used for gas analysis. For all
				other sources that require a determination of the molecular weight of the
				exhaust, any optional sampling procedure of R 336.2004(1)(c) may be used.
				Alternatives or modifications to procedures are subject to the approval of the
				department.
(C) The minimum volume
				per sample shall be 30 cubic feet of dry gas corrected to standard conditions
				(70 degrees Fahrenheit, 29.92 inches mercury). Minimum sample time shall be 60
				minutes, which may be continuous or a combination of shorter sampling periods
				for sources that operate in a cyclic manner. Smaller sampling times or sample
				volumes, if necessitated by process variables or other factors, may be approved
				by the department.
(D) For any
				source whose emission control device alters the moisture content of the exhaust
				gas, a moisture determination shall be performed in a location upstream from
				the emission control device and in accordance with R 336.2004(1)(d) or an
				alternative method approved by the department.
Michigan Administrative Code › Department - Environmental Quality › Air Quality Division › Part 10 - INTERMITTENT TESTING AND SAMPLING › Section R. 336.2013 - Reference test method 5D

Current through Vol. 24-12, July 15, 2024
Rule 1013. Reference test method 5D, testing of steel
				  manufacturing sources, reads as follows:
(a) General description. Emission testing
				procedures shall follow the methodology specified in R 336.2004(1)(c) and (d)
				and R 336.2012, unless otherwise provided in this rule.
(b) Coke battery pushing emission control
				equipment outlet test procedure for scrubbers. Outlet emission tests for any
				scrubber emission control equipment controlling coke battery emissions shall be
				conducted as follows:
(i) The pushing emission
				control system is operated on a batch type process and shall be tested as such
				using the reference test methods specified in subdivision (a) of this
				rule.
(ii) Each sampling point
				shall be sampled for 1 cycle operation, which is defined as beginning when the
				coke guide and snorkels are engaged and continuing until the quench car leaves
				the hood.
(iii) For a shed, the
				sampling period shall begin with the first movement of coke and shall end when
				the car enters the quench tower.
(iv) Integrated gas samples shall be taken
				over the entire test period. The samples shall be analyzed for carbon monoxide,
				carbon dioxide, oxygen, and nitrogen by means of an Orsat analyzer. The
				sampling and sample analysis shall be performed in accordance with R
				336.2004(1)(c). The average values from the 3 samples shall be used in
				determining the dry molecular weight of the exhaust gas. If a complete test is
				not performed during the day, at least 1 sample shall be taken.
(v) Based on design and previous data,
				saturated conditions shall be assumed. The moisture content shall be calculated
				as per R 336.2004(1)(d), based on stack conditions during the preliminary and
				sampling traverses.
(vi) The stack
				sampling equipment and procedures as described in method 5C shall be used in
				performing a particulate emission test, with the following variations:
(A) Due to the varying time required for
				pushing operations, an integer sampling time increment shall not be
				required.
(B) Because of the
				shorter sampling periods at each sampling point, a specific gas volume cannot
				be guaranteed. Therefore, an average sampling rate of not less than 0.90 dry
				standard cubic feet per minute shall be used during each sampling
				run.
(C) A stainless steel probe
				liner after the nozzle may be used.
(D) Glass or glass-lined stainless steel
				tubing and a glass cyclone between the probe and filter holder may be
				used.
(E) The probe and filter
				heating system may be heated at 248 ±25 degrees Fahrenheit.
Michigan Administrative Code › Department - Environmental Quality › Air Quality Division › Part 10 - INTERMITTENT TESTING AND SAMPLING › Section R. 336.2021 - Figures

Current through Vol. 24-12, July 15, 2024
Rule 1021. Figures 102 to 104 and 106 to 109 read as
				  follows:
Click Here To View
				  Image
Click Here To View
				  Image
Click Here To View
				  Image
Click Here To View
				  Image
Click Here To View
				  Image
Click Here To View
				  Image
Click Here To View
				  Image
Michigan Administrative Code › Department - Environmental Quality › Air Quality Division › Part 10 - INTERMITTENT TESTING AND SAMPLING › Section R. 336.2030 - Reference test method 9A

Current through Vol. 24-12, July 15, 2024
Rule 1030. Reference test method 9A, opacity measurement for
				  scarfer operations at steel manufacturing facilities, reads as follows: Visible
				  emission evaluations for scarfer operations at steel manufacturing facilities
				  shall be conducted as specified in reference test method 9, with the exception
				  that the data reduction provisions of section 2.5 of method 9 shall be based on
				  an average of 6 consecutive readings, recorded at 15-second
				  intervals.
Michigan Administrative Code › Department - Environmental Quality › Air Quality Division › Part 10 - INTERMITTENT TESTING AND SAMPLING › Section R. 336.2031 - Reference test method 9B

Current through Vol. 24-12, July 15, 2024
Rule 1031. Reference test method 9B, coke oven inspection
				  procedures for visible emissions, reads as follows:
(a) Charging. For the purposes of determining
				compliance with the coke oven standards for charging, the following inspection
				procedure shall be utilized:
(i) Observations
				for the purpose of determining compliance with the coke oven standards for
				charging emissions shall be made from any point or points on the topside of a
				coke oven battery from which an observer can obtain an unobstructed view of the
				charging operation. The observer shall determine and record the total number of
				seconds that charging emissions are visible during the charging of coal to the
				coke oven. The observer shall time the visible charging emissions with a
				stopwatch while observing the charging period. The observer shall stop the
				watch when visible emissions stop or are obscured from view and shall restart
				the stopwatch only when visible emissions are observed again. Simultaneous
				emissions from more than 1 emission point shall be timed and recorded as 1
				emission and shall not be added individually to the total time.
(ii) Charging emissions shall not include any
				emissions observed after all the charging port covers have been firmly seated
				following the removal of the larry car, such as emissions occurring when a
				cover is temporarily removed to permit the sweep-in of spilled coal.
(iii) The total number of seconds of visible
				emissions observed, clock time for the initiation and completion of the
				charging period, battery identification, and oven number of each charge shall
				be recorded by the observer. If observations of emissions from a charge are
				interrupted due to events beyond the control of the observer, the data from
				that charge shall be invalidated unless a violation has already been noted. The
				reason for invalidating the data shall be noted on the observer's observation
				sheet. The observer shall then resume observation of the next consecutive
				charge or charges, and continue until a set of consecutive charges has been
				obtained for comparison with the emission standard. The charge immediately
				preceding the interrupted charge and the charge immediately following the
				interrupted charge shall constitute consecutive charges. Compliance shall be
				determined by summing the seconds of charging emissions observed during any set
				of 4 consecutive charges on the same battery. Observations can be terminated
				once a violation has been identified, even though 4 complete charges have not
				been observed. Any 1 charge may be included in only 1 set of consecutive
				charges.
Michigan Administrative Code › Department - Environmental Quality › Air Quality Division › Part 10 - INTERMITTENT TESTING AND SAMPLING › Section R. 336.2032 - Reference test method 9C

Current through Vol. 24-12, July 15, 2024
Rule 1032. Reference test method 9C, opacity measurement for
				  basic oxygen furnace operations and hot metal transfer and desulfurization
				  operations at steel manufacturing facilities, reads as follows:
Fugitive and nonfugitive visible emission evaluation for
				  basic oxygen furnace operations, hot metal desulfurization, and hot metal
				  transfer operations shall be conducted as specified in reference test method 9,
				  with the exception that the data reduction provisions of section 2.5 of method
				  9 shall be based on an average of 12 consecutive readings recorded at 15-second
				  intervals.
Michigan Administrative Code › Department - Environmental Quality › Air Quality Division › Part 10 - INTERMITTENT TESTING AND SAMPLING › Section R. 336.2033 - Test methods for coke oven quench towers

Current through Vol. 24-12, July 15, 2024
Rule 1033.
(1) Test
				methods as applicable to coke oven quench towers. The publication entitled
				"Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater," (14th edition),
				section 208C, shall apply to the measurement of total dissolved solids in coke
				oven quench tower water.
(2) In
				addition to the provisions of section 208C, all of the following provisions
				shall apply to the measurement of total dissolved solids in coke oven quench
				tower water:
(a) The quench tower makeup water
				shall be sampled at locations downstream of any makeup water
				additions.
(b) The quench tower
				water shall be sampled between the quench tower sump and the quench tower spray
				nozzles.
(c) One sample of quench
				tower water for all operating quench towers shall be collected once per day, 5
				days per week.
(d) Compliance with
				the applicable quench tower limits shall be determined on a weekly
				basis.
(e) For purposes of
				determining compliance, either individual analysis of the collected samples may
				be averaged or a weekly composite analysis may be performed.
Michigan Administrative Code › Department - Environmental Quality › Air Quality Division › Part 10 - INTERMITTENT TESTING AND SAMPLING › Section R. 336.2040 - Method for determination of volatile organic compound emissions from coating lines and graphic arts lines

Current through Vol. 24-12, July 15, 2024
Rule 1040.
(1) The
				methods described in this rule shall be used for the determination of volatile
				organic compound emissions from coating lines and graphic arts lines for the
				purpose of determining compliance, during the specified averaging period, with
				an emission limit contained in any of the following:
(a) These rules.
(b) A permit to install.
(c) A permit to operate.
(d) A voluntary agreement.
(e) A performance contract.
(f) A stipulation.
(g) An order of the department.
For emission limits expressed as pounds of volatile organic
				  compounds per gallon of coating, minus water, as applied, the phrase "minus
				  water" shall also include compounds which are used as organic solvents and
				  which are excluded from the definition of volatile organic compound.
				  Concentrations of volatile organic compounds in coatings and inks shall be
				  determined by excluding water and compounds which are used as organic solvents
				  and which are excluded from the definition of volatile organic compound from
				  both the volume of volatiles in the coatings and inks and the volume of the
				  coatings and inks as applied.
Michigan Administrative Code › Department - Environmental Quality › Air Quality Division › Part 10 - INTERMITTENT TESTING AND SAMPLING › Section R. 336.2041 - Recordkeeping requirements for coating lines and graphic arts lines

Current through Vol. 24-12, July 15, 2024
Rule 1041.
(1)
				Unless otherwise specified in any of the following, the recordkeeping
				requirements specified in this rule shall apply to coating lines and graphic
				arts lines subject to emission limits contained in any of the following:
(a) These rules.
(b) A permit to install.
(c) A permit to operate.
(d) A voluntary agreement.
(e) A performance contract.
(f) A stipulation.
(g) An order of the department.
(h) A renewable operating permit.
Michigan Administrative Code › Department - Environmental Quality › Air Quality Division › Part 10 - INTERMITTENT TESTING AND SAMPLING › Section R. 336.2060 - Procedures for determination of compliance with R 336.1631

Current through Vol. 24-12, July 15, 2024
Rule 1060. The following procedures shall be used for the
				  determination of compliance with R 336.1631:
(a) The following procedure shall be used for
				the determination of compliance with R 336.1631 emission limitations expressed
				as pounds of volatile organic compound per 1,000 pounds of polystyrene resin,
				dry organic resin, or completed organic resin produced:
(i) Principle. Compliance with R 336.1631 is
				determined after determining all of the following:
(A) The concentration of volatile organic
				compounds in the effluent gas vented to the atmosphere.
(B) The flow rate of effluent gas vented to
				the atmosphere.
(C) The pounds of
				polystyrene resin, completed organic resin, or dry organic resin produced over
				a period of time or per batch.
(D)
				The length of time for each stage of the resin manufacturing
				operation.
Michigan Administrative Code › Department - Environmental Quality › Air Quality Division › Part 11 - CONTINUOUS EMISSION MONITORING › Section R. 336.2101 - Continuous emission monitoring, fossil fuel-fired steam generators

Current through Vol. 24-12, July 15, 2024
Rule 1101.
(1)
				Except as specified in R 336.2199, the owner or operator of any fossil
				fuel-fired steam generator that has an annual average capacity factor of more
				than 30%, as reported to the federal power commission for calendar year 1974,
				or as otherwise determined by the department, shall install, calibrate,
				maintain, and operate a continuous monitoring system for the measurement of all
				of the following:
(a) Opacity, if the
				generator has more than 250,000,000 Btu's per hour heat input, unless gaseous
				fuel is the only fuel burned, or unless oil or a mixture of gas and oil are the
				only fuels burned and the source is able to comply with the applicable
				particulate matter and opacity standards without utilization of particulate
				matter collection equipment, and where the source has never been found from any
				administrative or judicial proceedings to be in violation of the applicable
				visible emission standard.
(b)
				Sulfur dioxide, if the generator has a per hour heat input of more than
				250,000,000 Btu's and if sulfur dioxide emission control equipment has been
				installed.
(c) Nitrogen oxides if
				the generator has a per hour heat input of more than 1,000,000,000 Btu's, is
				subject to a nitrogen oxides emission standard, and is located in an air
				quality control region that has been determined by the administrator of the
				United States environmental protection agency to require a control strategy for
				nitrogen oxides, unless the owner or operator demonstrates, by source emission
				compliance tests, that the source emits nitrogen oxides at levels 30% or more
				below the applicable nitrogen oxide emission standard.
(d) Oxygen or carbon dioxide percentage, if
				measurement of oxygen or carbon dioxide in the flue gas is required to convert
				either sulfur dioxide or nitrogen oxides continuous emission monitoring data to
				units of the applicable emission standard.
Michigan Administrative Code › Department - Environmental Quality › Air Quality Division › Part 11 - CONTINUOUS EMISSION MONITORING › Section R. 336.2102 - Continuous emission monitoring; sulfuric acid-producing facilities

Current through Vol. 24-12, July 15, 2024
Rule 1102.
(1)
				Except as provided in R 336.2199, the owner or operator of any sulfuric acid
				plant having a production capacity of more than 300 tons per day, the
				production capacity being expressed as 100% acid, shall install, calibrate,
				maintain, and operate a continuous monitoring system for the measurement of
				sulfur dioxide for each sulfuric acid-producing facility within such
				plant.
(2) The owner or operator of
				any source subject to the provisions of subrule (1) shall complete the
				installation and performance tests of the equipment required by subrule (1) and
				shall begin monitoring and recording within 18 months from the effective date
				of this rule.
Michigan Administrative Code › Department - Environmental Quality › Air Quality Division › Part 11 - CONTINUOUS EMISSION MONITORING › Section R. 336.2103 - Continuous emission monitoring, fluid bed catalytic cracking unit catalyst regenerators at petroleum refineries

Current through Vol. 24-12, July 15, 2024
Rule 1103.
(1)
				Except as provided in R 336.2199, the owner or operator of any fluid bed
				catalytic cracking unit catalyst regenerator at a petroleum refinery having a
				per day fresh feed capacity of more than 20,000 barrels shall install,
				calibrate, maintain, and operate a continuous monitoring system for the
				measurement of opacity.
(2) The
				owner or operator of any source subject to the provisions of subrule (1) shall
				complete the installation and performance tests of the equipment required by
				subrule (1) and shall begin monitoring and recording within 18 months from the
				effective date of this rule.
Michigan Administrative Code › Department - Environmental Quality › Air Quality Division › Part 11 - CONTINUOUS EMISSION MONITORING › Section R. 336.2103a - Applicability of rules for mercury emissions

Current through Vol. 24-12, July 15, 2024
Rule 1103a.
(1) R
				336.2104 and R 336.2160 do not apply to affected EGUs for which the federal
				MATS, adopted by reference in R 336.2502, is an applicable requirement relative
				to emissions of mercury.
(2) If the
				federal MATS ceases to be an applicable requirement as to affected EGUs, R
				336.2104 and R 336.2160 shall apply beginning with the third calendar month
				following the termination of the federal MATS as an applicable requirement or
				April 16, 2015, whichever is later.
(3) R 336.2104 and R 336.2160 are rescinded
				60 days after the entry of a final judgment or order from which no further
				appeal or review is taken or available in
White Stallion v EP,
. No. 12-1100 (D.C. Circuit), upholding the provisions of the federal MATS
				relative to emissions of mercury.
Michigan Administrative Code › Department - Environmental Quality › Air Quality Division › Part 11 - CONTINUOUS EMISSION MONITORING › Section R. 336.2104 - Continuous emission monitoring; coal-fired electric generating units at a power plant

Current through Vol. 24-12, July 15, 2024
Rule 1104. Unless the federal MATS is an applicable
				  requirement, an affected EGU shall meet both of the following
				  requirements:
(a) Except as provided
				in R 336.2160, a unit that serves a generator with a nameplate capacity of more
				than 25 megawatts producing electricity for sale shall install, calibrate,
				maintain, and operate a continuous monitoring system or a sorbent trap
				monitoring system for the measurement of mercury.
(b) The owner or operator of any source
				subject to the provisions of subdivision (a) of this rule shall complete the
				installation and performance tests of the equipment required by subdivision (a)
				of this rule and shall begin monitoring and recording by April 16,
				2015.
Michigan Administrative Code › Department - Environmental Quality › Air Quality Division › Part 11 - CONTINUOUS EMISSION MONITORING › Section R. 336.2150 - Performance specifications for continuous emission monitoring systems

Current through Vol. 24-12, July 15, 2024
Rule 1150.
(1) The
				monitoring equipment required by R 336.2101, R 336.2102, R 336.2103, and R
				336.2104 shall be demonstrated by the owners or operators of the monitoring
				equipment to meet all of the following performance specifications:
(a) Continuous monitoring systems for
				measuring opacity shall comply with performance specification 1 of appendix B
				to 40 C.F.R. Part 60, adopted by reference in R 336.1299.
(b) Continuous monitoring systems for
				measuring nitrogen oxides shall comply with performance specification 2 of
				appendix B to 40 C.F.R. Part 60, adopted by reference in R 336.1299.
(c) Continuous monitoring systems for
				measuring sulfur dioxide shall comply with performance specification 2 of
				appendix B to 40 C.F.R. Part 60, adopted by reference in R 336.1299.
(d) Continuous monitoring systems for
				measuring oxygen shall comply with performance specification 3 of appendix B to
				40 C.F.R. Part 60, adopted by reference in R 336.1299.
(e) Continuous monitoring systems for
				measuring carbon dioxide shall comply with performance specification 3 of
				appendix B to 40 C.F.R. Part 60, adopted by reference in R 336.1299.
(f) Continuous monitoring for measuring stack
				gas volumetric flow shall comply with the requirements of 40 C.F.R. Part 75,
				§75.20(c) and appendix A and B, adopted by reference in R 336.1802a, or
				performance specification 6 of appendix B to 40 C.F.R. Part 60, adopted by
				reference in R 336.1299.
(g)
				Continuous monitoring for total vapor phase mercury emissions using a sorbent
				trap monitoring system shall comply with performance specification 12B of
				Appendix B to 40 C.F.R. Part 60, adopted by reference in R 336.1299.
(h) Continuous monitoring for total
				vapor-phase mercury emissions using a mercury continuous emission monitoring
				system shall comply with performance specification 12A of Appendix B to 40
				C.F.R. Part 60, adopted by reference in R 336.1299.
(i) ASTM D6784-02, "Standard Test Method for
				Elemental, Oxidized, Particle Bound and Total Mercury in Flue Gas Generated
				from Coal Fired Stationary Sources (Ontario Hydro Method)."
Michigan Administrative Code › Department - Environmental Quality › Air Quality Division › Part 11 - CONTINUOUS EMISSION MONITORING › Section R. 336.2151 - Calibration gases for continuous emission monitoring systems

Current through Vol. 24-12, July 15, 2024
Rule 1151.
(1) For
				nitrogen oxide monitoring systems installed on fossil fuel-fired steam
				generators, the pollutant gas used to prepare calibration gas mixtures shall be
				nitric oxide.
(2) For sulfur
				dioxide monitoring systems installed on fossil fuel-fired steam generators or
				sulfuric acid plants, the pollutant gas used to prepare calibration gas
				mixtures shall be sulfur dioxide.
(3) Span and zero gases shall be traceable to
				national bureau of standards reference gases when these reference gases are
				available. Every 6 months from the date of manufacture, span and zero gases
				shall be reanalyzed by conducting triplicate analyses using the reference
				method in appendix A of 40 C.F.R. Part 60, adopted by reference in R 336.1299,
				as follows:
(a) For sulfur dioxide, use
				reference method 6.
(b) For
				nitrogen oxides, use reference method 7.
(c) For carbon dioxide and oxygen, use
				reference method 3. The gases may be analyzed at less frequent intervals if
				longer shelf lives are guaranteed by the manufacturer.
Michigan Administrative Code › Department - Environmental Quality › Air Quality Division › Part 11 - CONTINUOUS EMISSION MONITORING › Section R. 336.2152 - Cycling time for continuous emission monitoring systems

Current through Vol. 24-12, July 15, 2024
Rule 1152.
(1)
				Continuous monitoring systems for measuring opacity shall complete a minimum of
				1 cycle of sampling and analyzing for each successive 10-second period and 1
				cycle of data recording for each successive 6-minute period.
(2) Continuous monitoring systems for
				measuring oxides of nitrogen, carbon dioxide, oxygen, or sulfur dioxide shall
				complete a minimum of 1 cycle of operation for each successive 15-minute
				period.
Michigan Administrative Code › Department - Environmental Quality › Air Quality Division › Part 11 - CONTINUOUS EMISSION MONITORING › Section R. 336.2153 - Zero and drift for continuous emission monitoring systems

Current through Vol. 24-12, July 15, 2024
Rule 1153.
(1) The
				owner or operator of any continuous emission monitoring system required by this
				part shall do all of the following:
(a)
				Subject the instruments to the manufacturer's recommended zero and span check
				at least once daily, unless the manufacturer has recommended adjustments at
				shorter intervals, in which case such recommendations shall be
				followed.
(b) Adjust the zero and
				span when the 24-hour zero drift or 24-hour calibration drift limits of the
				applicable performance specifications in appendix B of 40 C.F.R. Part
				60
,
adopted by reference in R 336.1299, are exceeded.
Michigan Administrative Code › Department - Environmental Quality › Air Quality Division › Part 11 - CONTINUOUS EMISSION MONITORING › Section R. 336.2155 - Monitor location for continuous emission monitoring systems

Current through Vol. 24-12, July 15, 2024
Rule 1155.
(1) The
				owner or operator of a source subject to provisions of this part shall install
				the required continuous monitoring systems or monitoring devices such that
				representative measurements of emissions or process parameters from the
				affected facility are obtained.
(2)
				When the effluents from 2 or more affected facilities of similar design and
				operating characteristics are combined before being released into the
				atmosphere, the owner or operator of a source subject to the provisions of this
				part may install monitoring systems on the combined effluent. When the affected
				facilities are not of similar design and operating characteristics, or when the
				effluent from 1 affected facility is released into the atmosphere through more
				than 1 point, the owner or operator shall establish alternate procedures to
				implement the intent of these requirements subject to approval by the
				department.
Michigan Administrative Code › Department - Environmental Quality › Air Quality Division › Part 11 - CONTINUOUS EMISSION MONITORING › Section R. 336.2156 - Performance testing notifications; monitoring notification

Current through Vol. 24-12, July 15, 2024
Rule 1156. The owner or operator of any source required to
				  install a continuous emission monitor by R 336.2101, R 336.2102, R 336.2103, or
				  R 336.2104 shall submit to the department all of the following:
(a) A source-specific monitoring plan not
				less than 60 days prior to performance specification testing of the monitoring
				system for the review and approval of the department.
(b) A site-specific test plan not less than
				30 days prior to the performance specification testing of the monitoring system
				for review and approval of the department.
(c) All results of performance specification
				testing not more than 60 days after the last date of the test.
Michigan Administrative Code › Department - Environmental Quality › Air Quality Division › Part 11 - CONTINUOUS EMISSION MONITORING › Section R. 336.2157 - Quality assurance requirements for continuous emission monitoring systems

Current through Vol. 24-12, July 15, 2024
Rule 1157.
(1) The
				monitoring equipment required by R 336.2101, R 336.2102, R 336.2103, and R
				336.2104 shall perform continuing quality control procedures in accordance with
				Part 60 Appendix F, adopted by reference in R 336.1299. Monitors installed and
				certified in accordance with Part 74 Appendix A, adopted by reference in R
				3361802a, and meeting the continuing quality control requirements of Part 75
				Appendix B are exempt from the requirements of Part 60 Appendix F.
(2) A continuous stack gas volumetric flow
				monitor installed for R 336.2104 shall perform continuing quality control in
				accordance with the applicable quality control and quality assurance
				requirements of 40 C.F.R.§75.21 and Part 75 Appendix B or Part 60 Appendix
				F.
Michigan Administrative Code › Department - Environmental Quality › Air Quality Division › Part 11 - CONTINUOUS EMISSION MONITORING › Section R. 336.2159 - Alternative continuous emission monitoring systems

Current through Vol. 24-12, July 15, 2024
Rule 1159. The department may provide approval for
				  alternative monitoring systems that do not comply with the requirements of this
				  part, if the owner or operator demonstrates both of the following:
(a) That an equivalent alternative emission
				monitoring system shall be implemented that satisfies the intent of the
				requirements of this part.
(b) That
				1 of the following conditions exists:
(i) A
				continuous emission monitoring system that conforms with the requirements of
				this part will not provide an accurate determination of emissions.
(ii) The affected source is operated less
				than 1 month per year.
(iii) A
				continuous emission monitoring system that conforms with the requirements of
				this part cannot be installed due to physical limitations of the
				source.
Michigan Administrative Code › Department - Environmental Quality › Air Quality Division › Part 11 - CONTINUOUS EMISSION MONITORING › Section R. 336.2160 - Mercury low mass emitter monitoring methodology

Current through Vol. 24-12, July 15, 2024
Rule 1160.
(1)
				Unless the federal MATS is an applicable requirement, beginning April 16, 2015,
				the monitoring methodology shall meet all of the requirements of this
				rule.
(2) The owner or operator of
				an affected unit that emits less than 464 ounces (29 pounds) of mercury per
				year may use the mercury low mass emitter monitoring methodology after
				performing initial certification testing. The owner or operator of the affected
				unit shall perform the initial certification testing and ongoing quality
				assurance as described in subrules (2) and (3) of this rule. The initial test
				shall be performed within 60 days of the effective date of these rules or 90
				days prior to the compliance date, whichever is later.
(3) For the initial certification testing,
				the following shall apply:
(a) The owner or
				operator shall perform mercury emission testing to determine the mercury
				concentration, for example, total vapor-phase mercury, in the
				effluent.
(b) Testing shall be
				performed using 1 of the following mercury reference methods: ASTM D6784-02,
				adopted by reference in R 336.2150, Method 29, method 30A, or method 30B of
				Part 60, adopted by reference in R 336.1299. A test shall consist of a minimum
				of 3 runs at maximum routine load while firing fuel or fuels with the highest
				mercury content.
(c) The minimum
				run time shall be 1 hour if method 30A is used. If method 29, ASTM D6784-02, or
				method 30B is used, paired samples are required for each test run and the runs
				shall be long enough to ensure that sufficient mercury is collected to analyze.
				When method 29 or ASTM D6784-02 is used the test results shall be based on the
				vapor-phase mercury collected in the back half of the sampling train. For each
				method 29, ASTM D6784-02, or method 30B test run, the paired trains shall meet
				the relative deviation requirement specified in method 30B. If the relative
				deviation specification is met, the result of the 2 samples shall be averaged
				arithmetically.
(d) If the unit is
				equipped with flue gas desulfurization or add-on mercury emission controls, the
				controls shall be operating normally during the testing, and for the purpose of
				establishing proper operation of the controls, parametric data shall be
				recorded.
(e) A complete test plan
				and test notification shall be provided to the department 30 days prior to the
				testing.
Michigan Administrative Code › Department - Environmental Quality › Air Quality Division › Part 11 - CONTINUOUS EMISSION MONITORING › Section R. 336.2170 - Monitoring data reporting and recordkeeping

Current through Vol. 24-12, July 15, 2024
Rule 1170.
(1) The
				owner or operator of any continuous emission monitoring system required by this
				part shall submit to the department, within 30 days of the end of a calendar
				quarter, a written report for each calendar quarter which shall include all of
				the following information:
(a) Excess
				emissions and the nature and cause of the excess emissions, if known, as
				follows:
(i) For opacity measurements, the
				report shall consist of the magnitude, in actual percent opacity, of all
				6-minute averages of opacity more than the applicable opacity standard for each
				hour of operation (all allowable exceptions are to be deducted before
				determining the excess averages of opacity). Average values shall be obtained
				by integration over the averaging period or by arithmetically averaging a
				minimum of 24 equally spaced, instantaneous opacity measurements per 6
				minutes.
(ii) For gaseous
				measurements, the report shall consist of emission averages, in the units of
				the applicable standard, for each averaging period during which the applicable
				standard was exceeded.
Michigan Administrative Code › Department - Environmental Quality › Air Quality Division › Part 11 - CONTINUOUS EMISSION MONITORING › Section R. 336.2175 - Data reduction procedures for fossil fuel-fired steam generators

Current through Vol. 24-12, July 15, 2024
Rule 1175.
(1) The
				owner or operator of a fossil fuel-fired steam generator that is subject to the
				provisions of this part shall convert gaseous emission monitoring data in parts
				per million to pounds per million Btu's using either of the following
				procedures:
(a) When the owner or operator
				elects to measure oxygen in the flue gases, the measurements of the pollutant
				concentration and oxygen concentration shall each be on a consistent basis (wet
				or dry). When measurements are on a dry basis, the following conversion
				procedure shall be used:
Click Here To View
				  Image
When measurements are on a wet basis, alternative procedures
				  approved by the department shall be used.
(b) When the owner or operator elects to
				measure carbon dioxide in the flue gases, the measurements of the pollutant
				concentration and carbon dioxide concentration shall each be on a consistent
				basis (wet or dry) and the following conversion procedure shall be used:
Click Here To View
				  Image
Michigan Administrative Code › Department - Environmental Quality › Air Quality Division › Part 11 - CONTINUOUS EMISSION MONITORING › Section R. 336.2176 - Data reduction procedures for sulfuric acid plant

Current through Vol. 24-12, July 15, 2024
Rule 1176. The owner or operator of a sulfuric acid plant
				  that is subject to the provisions of this part shall do both of the
				  following:
(a) Establish a conversion
				factor 3 times daily according to the procedures in the standards of
				performance for new stationary sources, 40 C.F.R. Part 60.84(b), adopted by
				reference in R 336.1299.
(b)
				Multiply the conversion factor by the average sulfur dioxide concentration in
				the flue gases to obtain the average sulfur dioxide emissions in pounds per
				short ton.
Michigan Administrative Code › Department - Environmental Quality › Air Quality Division › Part 11 - CONTINUOUS EMISSION MONITORING › Section R. 336.2189 - Alternative data reporting or reduction procedures

Current through Vol. 24-12, July 15, 2024
Rule 1189. The department may provide approval for
				  alternative data reporting or reduction procedures that do not comply with the
				  requirements of this part if the owner or operator demonstrates, to the
				  satisfaction of the department, that the procedures are at least as accurate as
				  the procedures identified in this part.
Michigan Administrative Code › Department - Environmental Quality › Air Quality Division › Part 11 - CONTINUOUS EMISSION MONITORING › Section R. 336.2190 - Monitoring system malfunctions

Current through Vol. 24-12, July 15, 2024
Rule 1190. The monitoring and reporting requirements of this
				  part shall not apply during any period of monitoring system malfunction if the
				  source owner or operator demonstrates both of the following to the satisfaction
				  of the department:
(a) That the cause
				of the malfunction could not have been avoided by any course of action that
				could have reasonably been expected of the owner or operator.
(b) That the necessary repairs are being made
				as expeditiously as practicable.
Michigan Administrative Code › Department - Environmental Quality › Air Quality Division › Part 11 - CONTINUOUS EMISSION MONITORING › Section R. 336.2199 - Exemptions from continuous emission monitoring requirements

Current through Vol. 24-12, July 15, 2024
Rule 1199. The requirements of R 336.2101, R 336.2102, and R
				  336.2103 do not apply to either of the following:
(a) A source subject to a new source
				performance standard promulgated in the standards of performance for new
				stationary sources, 40 C.F.R. Part 60, adopted by reference in
R 336.1299. (b) A source is not subject to an applicable
				  emission standard.
Michigan Administrative Code › Department - Environmental Quality › Air Quality Division › Part 14 - CLEAN CORPORATE CITIZEN PROGRAM › Section R. 336.2413 - Waivers to commence construction and operation

Current through Vol. 24-12, July 15, 2024
Rule 1413.
(1)
				Before the approval of a permit to install required pursuant to these rules, a
				clean corporate citizen may request a department waiver to proceed with
				construction and, if desired, operation of process or process equipment at an
				existing stationary source. The request for a waiver shall be in writing, shall
				be accompanied by an administratively complete application for a permit to
				install, shall not include proposed process or process equipment prohibited by
				federal requirements from commencing construction or operation before issuance
				of an approved permit, and shall be signed by the owner or the owner's
				authorized agent. The request for a waiver shall be automatically approved 15
				calendar days after receipt of the request and required information, unless,
				within the 15-calendar-day period, either the request is denied in writing for
				cause by the department or an extension of up to 15 additional calendar days is
				specified in writing by the department. If the time period is extended, the
				request for a waiver shall be automatically approved at the end of the extended
				time period, unless the request for a waiver is denied by the department within
				the extended time period.
(2) If a
				waiver is approved, the clean corporate citizen applicant shall comply with all
				of the following provisions:
(a) Submit all
				pertinent information, including plans and specifications, necessary for a
				technically complete application for a permit to install as soon as is
				reasonably practical.
(b) Be
				authorized to proceed to construct and operate the process or process equipment
				according to the terms of the approved waiver at the applicant's own
				risk.
(c) Comply with all federal,
				state, and local air quality requirements applicable to the process or process
				equipment covered by the approved waiver at all times. The applicable
				requirements may include, but not be limited to, any of the following:
(i) Emissions limitations.
(ii) Operation limitations.
(iii) Fuel limitations.
(iv) Emissions testing.
(v) Continuous emissions
				monitoring.
(vi)
				Notifications.
(vii)
				Recordkeeping.
Michigan Administrative Code › Department - Environmental Quality › Air Quality Division › Part 15 - EMISSION LIMITATIONS AND PROHIBITIONS-MERCURY › Section R. 336.2502 - Adoptions by reference

Current through Vol. 24-12, July 15, 2024
Rule 1502. The following standards are adopted in these rules
				  by reference and are available as noted.: Title 40 C.F.R., part 63, subpart
				  UUUUU, "National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Coal and Oil
				  Fired Electric Utility Steam Generating Units" (2012). Copies are available for
				  inspection and purchase at the Air Quality Division, Department of
				  Environmental Quality, 525 West Allegan Street, P.O. Box 30260, Lansing,
				  Michigan 48909-7760, at the cost at the time of adoption of these rules (AQD
				  price $50.00). Copies may also be obtained from the Superintendent of
				  Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, 732 North Capitol Street, NW,
				  Washington, DC 20401, by calling 1-866-512-1800 or by accessing their online
				  bookstore at http://bookstore.gpo.gov [File Link Not Available] at a cost as of
				  the time of adoption of these rules (GPO price $40.00 for part 63
				  (63.9980-63.10042)). The standards can be viewed and/or printed free of charge
				  at http://ecfr.gpoaccess.gov [File Link Not Available].
Michigan Administrative Code › Department - Environmental Quality › Air Quality Division › Part 15 - EMISSION LIMITATIONS AND PROHIBITIONS-MERCURY › Section R. 336.2502a - Applicability of rules

Current through Vol. 24-12, July 15, 2024
Rule 1502a.
(1) The
				following rules shall be of no force or effect as to affected EGUs for which
				the federal MATS is an applicable requirement relative to emissions of mercury:
R 336.2503 to R 336.2513. Notwithstanding, the department
				  shall retain the authority for approvals under R 336.2503(2)(b), R
				  336.2504(3)(b), R 336.2506(2) and (4), and R 336.2513(1)(b).
(2) If the federal M ATS ceases to be an
				applicable requirement as to affected EGUs, R 336.2503 to R 336.2513 shall be
				in force and effect beginning with the third calendar month following the
				termination of the federal MATS as an applicable requirement or April 16, 2015,
				whichever is later.
(3) The
				provisions of this part are repealed in total and voided 60 days after the
				entry of a final judgment or order from which no further appeal or review is
				taken or available in White Stallion v EPA , No. 12 - 1100 (D.C. Circuit)
				upholding the provisions of the federal MATS relative to emissions of
				mercury
Michigan Administrative Code › Department - Environmental Quality › Air Quality Division › Part 15 - EMISSION LIMITATIONS AND PROHIBITIONS-MERCURY › Section R. 336.2503 - Mercury emission standards for electric generating units

Current through Vol. 24-12, July 15, 2024
Rule 1503.
(1)
				Unless the federal MATS is an applicable requirement, beginning April 16, 2015,
				an affected existing EGU as defined in this part shall meet either of the
				following, unless projects have been approved under subrule (2) or (3) of this
				rule:
(a) A minimum of 90% reduction from
				baseline input mercury levels as determined under
R 336.2505 on a 12 - month rolling average basis as
				  determined at the end of each calendar month.
(b) An output-based emission standard of
				0.008 pounds of mercury per gigawatts-hour on a 12-month rolling average basis
				as determined at the end of each calendar month.
Michigan Administrative Code › Department - Environmental Quality › Air Quality Division › Part 15 - EMISSION LIMITATIONS AND PROHIBITIONS-MERCURY › Section R. 336.2504 - Stationary source specific mercury emission standards

Current through Vol. 24-12, July 15, 2024
Rule 1504.
(1) This
				rule provides for stationary source specific mercury emissions standards unless
				the federal MATS is an applicable requirement.
(2) Lansing board of water and light, eckert
				power station, units 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 shall be provided the following
				extension to the provisions in R 336.2503(1):
(a) Beginning April 16, 2015, Lansing board
				of water and light, eckert power station, units 1, 2, and 3 shall comply with
				the VLME unit provisions under R 336.2503(3) and units 4, 5, and 6 shall each
				receive a mercury emission limit of 19 pounds (304 ounces) per 12-month rolling
				time period as determined at the end of each calendar month.
(b) Beginning April 16, 2015, the total
				mercury emission limit for Lansing board of water and light, eckert power
				station, affected existing EGUs shall be 84 pounds (1,344 ounces) per 12-month
				rolling time period as determined at the end of each calendar month.
(c) Beginning April 16, 2018, the total
				mercury emission limit for Lansing board of water and light, eckert power
				station, affected existing EGUs shall be 57 pounds (912 ounces) per 12-month
				rolling time period as determined at the end of each calendar month.
(d) Compliance with the mercury emission
				limits may be demonstrated using stationary source-wide pooling.
(e) Not later than January 16 of the
				applicable compliance year, Lansing Board of water and light eckert power
				station shall provide verification and certification of their proposed
				compliance demonstration notification extension using written documentation
				under R 336.2509.
(f) If the owner
				or operator for Lansing board of water and light, eckert power station, units
				1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 has obtained an extension of compliance for the federal
				MATS pursuant to 40 C.F.R. 63.6(i), adopted by reference in R 336.1902, then
				the requirements in subdivisions (a), (b), and (c) of this subrule are
				suspended for the duration of the extension of compliance regardless of whether
				the federal MATS is an applicable requirement .