2023 Wisconsin Statutes & Annotations › Chapter 628 - Insurance marketing. › 628.34 - Unfair marketing practices.

628.34
Unfair marketing practices.
(1)
Misrepresentation.
(a)
Conduct forbidden. No person who is or should be licensed under chs. 600 to 646, no employee or agent of any such person, no person whose primary interest is as a competitor of a person licensed under chs. 600 to 646, and no person on behalf of any of the foregoing persons may make or cause to be made any communication relating to an insurance contract, the insurance business, any insurer, or any intermediary that contains false or misleading information, including information that is misleading because of incompleteness. Filing a report and, with intent to deceive a person examining it, making a false entry in a record or willfully refraining from making a proper entry, are “communications" within the meaning of this paragraph. No intermediary or insurer may use any business name, slogan, emblem, or related device that is misleading or likely to cause the intermediary or insurer to be mistaken for another insurer or intermediary already in business. No intermediary may provide a misleading certificate of insurance.
(b)
Presumption of insurer's violation. If an insurance agent distributes cards or documents, exhibits a sign or publishes an advertisement which violates par. (a), having reference to a particular insurer that the agent represents, the agent's violation creates a rebuttable presumption that the violation was also committed by the insurer.
(2)
Unfair inducements.
(a)
General. No insurer, no employee of an insurer, and no insurance intermediary may seek to induce any person to enter into an insurance contract or to terminate an existing insurance contract by offering benefits not specified in the policy, nor may any insurer make any agreement of insurance that is not clearly expressed in the policy to be issued. This subsection does not preclude the reduction of premiums by reason of expense savings, including commission reductions, resulting from any form of mass marketing.
(b)
Absorption of tax. No agent, broker or insurer may absorb the tax under s. 618.43 (2).
(3)
Unfair discrimination.
(a)
No insurer may unfairly discriminate among policyholders by charging different premiums or by offering different terms of coverage except on the basis of classifications related to the nature and the degree of the risk covered or the expenses involved, subject to ss. 632.365, 632.729, 632.746 and 632.748. Rates are not unfairly discriminatory if they are averaged broadly among persons insured under a group, blanket or franchise policy, and terms are not unfairly discriminatory merely because they are more favorable than in a similar individual policy.
(b)
No insurer may refuse to insure or refuse to continue to insure, or limit the amount, extent or kind of coverage available to an individual, or charge an individual a different rate for the same coverage because of a mental or physical disability except when the refusal, limitation or rate differential is based on either sound actuarial principles supported by reliable data or actual or reasonably anticipated experience, subject to ss. 632.746 to 632.7495.
(4)
Restraint of competition. No person who is or should be licensed under chs. 600 to 646, no employee or agent of any such person, no person whose primary interest is as a competitor of a person licensed under chs. 600 to 646, and no one acting on behalf of any of the foregoing persons, may commit or enter into any agreement to participate in any act of boycott, coercion or intimidation tending to unreasonable restraint of the business of insurance or to monopoly in that business.
(5)
Free choice of insurer. No person may restrict in the choice of an insurer or insurance intermediary another person required to pay the cost of insurance coverage whenever the procurement of insurance coverage is required as a condition for the conclusion of a contract or other transaction or for the exercise of any right under a contract. However, the person requiring the coverage may reserve the right to disapprove on reasonable grounds the insurer or the coverage selected. The form of corporate organization of an insurer authorized to do business in this state is not a reasonable ground for disapproval, and the commissioner may by rule specify that additional grounds are not reasonable.
(6)
Extra charges. No person may make any charge other than premiums and premium financing charges for the protection of property or of a security interest in property, as a condition for obtaining, renewing or continuing the financing of a purchase of the property or the lending of money on the security of an interest in the property.
(7)
Influencing employers. No insurer or insurance intermediary or employee or agent of either may, in connection with an insurance transaction, encourage, persuade or attempt to influence any employer to refuse employment to or to discharge any person arbitrarily or unreasonably.
(8)
Use of official position. No person holding an elective, appointive or civil service position in federal, state or local government may use decision-making power or influence in that position to coerce the placement of insurance for any prospective policyholder through any particular intermediary or with any particular insurer.
(9)
Refusal to return indicia of agency. No agent may refuse or fail to return promptly all indicia of agency to the principal on demand.
(10)
Insurance security fund. No insurer or insurance intermediary may make use in any manner of the protection given policyholders by ch. 646 as a reason for buying insurance from the insurer or intermediary.
(11)
Other unfair trade practices. No person may engage in any other unfair method of competition or any other unfair or deceptive act or practice in the business of insurance, as defined under sub. (12).
(12)
Rules defining unfair trade practices. The commissioner may define specific unfair trade practices by rule, after a finding that they are misleading, deceptive, unfairly discriminatory, provide an unfair inducement, or restrain competition unreasonably.
(13)
Marketing of wellness programs.
(a)
In this subsection, “wellness program" means a program that is designed to promote health or prevent disease through a reward to insured individuals and that meets the qualifications of 45 CFR 146.121 (f) (1) or (2).
(b)
Notwithstanding subs. (2) (a), (3), (7), and (11) and any rules promulgated under sub. (12), it is not a violation of this section for an insurer to advertise, market, offer, or operate a wellness program.
(14)
Evidence of insurance.
(a)
No person may prepare, issue, request, or require a certificate of insurance or other document used for evidence of insurance to do any of the following:
1.
Contain information concerning the policy referenced by the certificate of insurance or other document that is false, misleading, deceptive, unfairly discriminatory, or that otherwise violates public policy or law, as determined by the commissioner.
2.
Purport to alter, amend, or extend coverage provided by the policy referenced by the certificate of insurance or other document.
3.
Alter the terms and conditions of any notice requirement in the policy. A person is entitled to notice of cancellation, nonrenewal, or any material change to the policy, or to any similar notice concerning the policy only as provided in the policy or an endorsement.
(b)
No person may alter a certificate of insurance or other document used for evidence of insurance after it is issued.
(c)
No certificate of insurance or other document used for evidence of insurance may warrant that the policy referenced by the certificate of insurance or other document fulfills the insurance or indemnification requirements of a specific contract.
(d)
1.
Except as provided in subd. 2., this subsection applies to any certificate of insurance or other document used for evidence of insurance that is issued by an insurer as evidence of property or casualty insurance.
2.
This subsection does not apply to any of the following:
a.
A policy or endorsement.
b.
A binder.
c.
Evidence of motor vehicle liability insurance required under s. 344.62 (2).
(15)
Travel insurance.
(a)
In this subsection:
1.
“Blanket travel insurance” has the meaning given in s. 632.977 (1) (a).
2.
“Limited lines travel insurance producer” has the meaning given in s. 632.977 (1) (e).
3.
“Travel insurance” has the meaning given in s. 632.977 (1) (i).
4.
“Travel retailer” has the meaning given in s. 632.977 (1) (k).
(b)
No person may market blanket travel insurance as free.
(c)
No person may offer or sell a travel insurance policy that could never result in payment of any claims for any insured under the policy.
(d)
When travel insurance is marketed to a prospective purchaser through the Internet site of the insurer or an aggregator Internet site that provides access to information on insurance products from more than one insurer, the inclusion on the Internet site of a summary of the travel insurance policy's coverage does not violate this section if the summary is accurate and the prospective purchaser has access to the policy's full provisions through electronic means.
(e)
When a person purchases a trip or travel package to a destination jurisdiction that requires insurance coverage, a travel retailer or limited lines travel insurance producer supplying the trip or travel package does not violate this section by requiring that the person, as a condition of purchasing the trip or travel package, choose between purchasing the required coverage through the travel retailer or limited lines travel insurance producer or agreeing to obtain and provide proof of the required coverage prior to departure.
History:  1975 c. 371, 421; 1979 c. 89, 109, 313, 355; 1991 a. 279; 1995 a. 289; 1997 a. 27, 237; 2009 a. 275; 2011 a. 224; 2017 a. 241; 2019 a. 185; 2021 a. 111.
Any administrative rule requiring dissemination of cost disclosure information that is misleading due to incompleteness is beyond the scope of the commissioner of insurance's authority in that it violates sub. (1) (a). Aetna Life Insurance Co. v. Mitchell, 101 Wis. 2d 90, 303 N.W.2d 639 (1981).
There is no private right of action to enforce sub. (3). NAACP v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co., 978 F.2d 287 (1992).