2023 Wisconsin Statutes & Annotations › Chapter 631 - Insurance contracts generally. › 631.83 - Limitation of actions.

631.83
Limitation of actions.
(1)
Statutory periods of limitation.
(a)
Fire insurance. An action on a fire insurance policy must be commenced within 12 months after the inception of the loss. This rule also applies to riders or endorsements attached to a fire insurance policy covering loss or damage to property or to the use of or income from property from any cause, and to separate windstorm or hail insurance policies.
(b)
Disability insurance. An action on disability insurance coverage must be commenced within 3 years from the time written proof of loss is required to be furnished.
(c)
Life claims based on absence of insured. Sections 813.22 to 813.34 apply to life insurance actions based on death in which absence is relied upon as evidence of death.
(d)
Other. Except as provided in this subsection or elsewhere in chs. 600 to 646 and 655, s. 893.43 applies to actions on insurance policies.
(2)
General law applicable to limitation of actions. Except for the prescription of time periods under sub. (1) or elsewhere in chs. 600 to 646 and 655, the general law applicable to limitation of actions as modified by ch. 893 applies to actions on insurance policies.
(3)
Prohibited clauses of policies. No insurance policy may:
(a)
Shorten periods of limitation. Limit the time for beginning an action on the policy to a time less than that authorized by the statutes;
(b)
Limit jurisdiction. Prescribe in what court action may be brought thereon; or
(c)
Proscribe action. Provide that no action may be brought.
(4)
Minimum waiting period for action. No action may be brought against the insurer on an insurance policy to compel payment thereunder until at least 60 days after proof of loss has been furnished as required by the policy or such proof of loss has been waived, or the insurer has denied full payment, whichever is earlier. This subsection does not apply in any case in which the verified complaint alleges facts that would establish prejudice to the complainant by reason of such delay, other than the delay itself.
(5)
Tolling of period of limitation. The period of limitation is tolled during the period in which the parties conducted an appraisal or arbitration procedure prescribed by the insurance policy or by law or agreed to by the parties.
History:  1975 c. 375; 1979 c. 89, 102; 1983 a. 192; 1987 a. 247; 1989 a. 187 s. 29.
The term “fire insurance" covers indemnity insurance for losses to property caused by many perils other than fire. Villa Clement, Inc. v. National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh, 120 Wis. 2d 140, 353 N.W.2d 369 (Ct. App. 1984).
Action by mortgagees of insured property against the insurer for paying the policy proceeds to the insured despite knowledge of the mortgagee's interest was not on the policy and was not barred by sub. (1) (a). Picus v. Copus, 127 Wis. 2d 359, 379 N.W.2d 341 (Ct. App. 1985).
The s. 893.57 statute of limitations governs the intentional tort of bad faith by an insurer. Warmka v. Hartland Cicero Mutual Insurance Co., 136 Wis. 2d 31, 400 N.W.2d 923 (1987).
“Inception of the loss" in sub. (1) (a) means the date on which the loss occurs, not the discovery date. Borgen v. Economy Preferred Insurance Co., 176 Wis. 2d 498, 500 N.W.2d 419 (Ct. App. 1993).
The failure of policyholders to give notice to an underinsurer of a settlement between the insured and the tortfeasor did not bar underinsured motorist coverage in the absence of prejudice to the insurer. There is a rebuttable presumption of prejudice when there is a lack of notice, with the burden on the insured to prove by the greater weight of the evidence that the insurer was not prejudiced. Ranes v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co., 219 Wis. 2d 49, 580 N.W.2d 197 (1998), 97-0441.
Sub. (2) clearly and unambiguously excepts the time limitations for fire insurance claims from the application of s. 893.12. Wieting Funeral Home of Chilton, Inc. v. Meridian Mutual Insurance Co., 2004 WI App 218, 277 Wis. 2d 274, 690 N.W.2d 442, 04-0461.
An “agreement" by the parties to engage in an appraisal procedure under sub. (5) requires something more than a mere agreement to meet and discuss a dispute between the parties. Wieting Funeral Home of Chilton, Inc. v. Meridian Mutual Insurance Co., 2004 WI App 218, 277 Wis. 2d 274, 690 N.W.2d 442, 04-0461.
The key word in sub. (1) (a) is not loss, but inception. In a claim arising from damage to corn yield resulting from vandalism to a corn planter, the inception of that loss was the moment overfertilized seeds were planted with the vandalized corn planter. Bronsteatter & Sons, Inc. v. American Growers Insurance Co., 2005 WI App 192, 286 Wis. 2d 782, 703 N.W.2d 757, 05-0115.
Because all of the statutory language surrounding sub. (5), including the statute regulating arbitration and appraisals, applies only to first-party claims, sub. (5) tolls the period of limitation only as to claims by insureds against their insurer, not to claims by third parties against a tortfeasor's insurer. Thom v. OneBeacon Insurance Co., 2007 WI App 123, 300 Wis. 2d 607, 731 N.W.2d 657, 06-1617.