reglab/statecodes huggingface dataset:
2023 Revised Code of Washington › Title 10 - Criminal Procedure › Chapter 10.55 - Witnesses Outside the State (Uniform Act). › 10.55.060 - Witness from another state summoned to testify in this state.

RCW 10.55.060
Witness from another state summoned to testify in this state.
If any person in any state, which by its laws has made provision for commanding persons within its borders to attend and testify in criminal prosecutions, or grand jury investigations commenced or about to commence, in this state, is a material witness either for the prosecution or for the defense, in a criminal action pending in a court of record in this state, or in a grand jury investigation which has commenced or is about to commence, a judge of such court may issue a certificate under the seal of the court stating these facts and specifying the number of days the witness will be required. Said certificate may include a recommendation that the witness be taken into immediate custody and delivered to an officer of this state to assure his or her attendance in this state. This certificate shall be presented to a judge of a court of record in the county in which the witness is found.
If the witness is summoned to attend and testify in this state he or she shall be tendered the sum of ten cents a mile for each mile by the ordinary traveled route to and from the court where the prosecution is pending and five dollars for each day that he or she is required to travel and attend as a witness. A witness who has appeared in accordance with the provisions of the summons shall not be required to remain within this state a longer period of time than the period mentioned in the certificate, unless otherwise ordered by the court. If such witness, after coming into this state, fails without good cause to attend and testify as directed in the summons, he or she shall be punished in the manner provided for the punishment of any witness who disobeys a summons issued from a court of record in this state.
[ 2010 c 8 § 1051; 1943 c 218 § 3; Rem. Supp. 1943 § 2150-3. Formerly RCW 10.55.060, 10.55.070, 10.55.080, and 10.55.090.]
2023 Revised Code of Washington › Title 10 - Criminal Procedure › Chapter 10.55 - Witnesses Outside the State (Uniform Act). › 10.55.100 - Exemption of witness from arrest and service of process.

RCW 10.55.100
Exemption of witness from arrest and service of process.
If a person comes into this state in obedience to a summons directing him or her to attend and testify in this state he or she shall not while in this state pursuant to such summons be subject to arrest or the service of process, civil or criminal, in connection with matters which arose before his or her entrance into this state under the summons.
If a person passes through this state while going to another state in obedience to a summons to attend and testify in that state or while returning therefrom, he or she shall not while so passing through this state be subject to arrest or the service of process, civil or criminal, in connection with matters which arose before his or her entrance into this state under the summons.
[ 2010 c 8 § 1052; 1943 c 218 § 4; Rem. Supp. 1943 § 2150-4.]
2023 Revised Code of Washington › Title 10 - Criminal Procedure › Chapter 10.55 - Witnesses Outside the State (Uniform Act). › 10.55.110 - Uniformity of interpretation.

RCW 10.55.110
Uniformity of interpretation.
This chapter shall be so interpreted and construed as to effectuate its general purpose to make uniform the law of the states which enact it.
[ 1943 c 218 § 5; Rem. Supp. 1943 § 2150-5.]
2023 Revised Code of Washington › Title 10 - Criminal Procedure › Chapter 10.55 - Witnesses Outside the State (Uniform Act). › 10.55.120 - Short title.

RCW 10.55.120
Short title.
This chapter may be cited as "Uniform Act to Secure the Attendance of Witnesses from Without a State in Criminal Proceedings."
[ 1943 c 218 § 6; Rem. Supp. 1943 § 2150-6.]
2023 Revised Code of Washington › Title 10 - Criminal Procedure › Chapter 10.56 - Witnesses—Eyewitnesses and Informants. › 10.56.010 - Intent.

RCW 10.56.010
Intent.
The legislature recognizes that prosecuting attorneys, law enforcement, and society at large strive for a criminal justice system that minimizes the risk [that] actually innocent people will be convicted. The legislature further recognizes that mistaken identification by witnesses to crime and false testimony by informants who are given benefits in exchange for their testimony have contributed to the conviction of the innocent in Washington state. Through the development of best practices related to the collection of eyewitness evidence and the use of informant witnesses, and the adoption of model guidelines to implement those practices, the legislature aims to improve the quality of such evidence and reduce the risk of wrongful conviction related to these contributing factors.
[ 2019 c 359 § 1.]
2023 Revised Code of Washington › Title 10 - Criminal Procedure › Chapter 10.56 - Witnesses—Eyewitnesses and Informants. › 10.56.040 - Local protocols for the use of informants.

RCW 10.56.040
Local protocols for the use of informants.
(1) No later than December 31, 2020, each county prosecuting attorney shall:
(a) Adopt and implement a written local protocol for the use of informants consistent with the model guidelines developed pursuant to *RCW 10.56.030, and submit a copy of the local protocol to the work group established in *RCW 10.56.030; and
(b) Establish and maintain a central record of informants used in the course of criminal proceedings as well as formal offers to give testimony or other information. This record is the confidential work product of the office of the prosecuting attorney.
(2) If a county prosecutor adopts the model guidelines developed by the work group established under *RCW 10.56.030, it has met the requirements of subsection (1)(a) of this section.
(3) If a county prosecutor chooses to adopt its own local protocol, the protocol must articulate adequate preliminary disclosures to the defense and include a list of procedures for prosecuting attorneys to follow when evaluating the reliability of an informant that includes:
(a) The complete criminal history of the informant including pending criminal charges;
(b) Any consideration provided in exchange for the information or testimony;
(c) Whether the informant's information or testimony was modified or recanted;
(d) The number of times the informant has previously provided information or testimony in exchange for consideration; and
(e) The kind and quality of other evidence corroborating the informant's information or testimony.
(4) Nothing in this section diminishes federal constitutional disclosure obligations to criminal defendants or any related obligations under Washington case law, statutes, or court rules.
(5) For the purposes of this section, "informant" means any person who: (a) Was previously unconnected with the criminal case as either a witness or a codefendant; (b) claims to have relevant information about the crime; (c) is currently charged with a crime or is facing potential criminal charges or is in custody; and (d) at any time receives consideration in exchange for providing the information or testimony.
[ 2019 c 359 § 4.]
NOTES:
*Reviser's note: RCW 10.56.030 expired December 31, 2022.
2023 Revised Code of Washington › Title 10 - Criminal Procedure › Chapter 10.56 - Witnesses—Eyewitnesses and Informants. › 10.56.050 - Jury instruction for informant testimony.

RCW 10.56.050
Jury instruction for informant testimony.
(1) If the testimony of an informant is admitted in a criminal proceeding, the prosecuting attorney or defendant may request a jury instruction on exercising caution in evaluating the credibility of an informant. Except when otherwise determined by the court, the instruction should be substantially similar to the following form:
"The testimony of an informant, given on behalf of the [State] [City] [County] in exchange for a legal advantage or other benefit, should be subjected to careful examination in the light of other evidence in the case, and should be acted upon with great caution. You, the jury, must weigh the credibility of his or her testimony. You should not find the defendant guilty upon such testimony alone unless, after carefully considering the testimony, you are satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt of its truth."
(2) For the purposes of this section, "informant" has the same meaning as in RCW 10.56.040.
[ 2019 c 359 § 5.]
2023 Revised Code of Washington › Title 10 - Criminal Procedure › Chapter 10.58 - Evidence. › 10.58.010 - Rules—Generally.

RCW 10.58.010
Rules—Generally.
The rules of evidence in civil actions, so far as practicable, shall be applied to criminal prosecutions.
[Code 1881 § 1071; 1873 p 234 § 233; 1854 p 117 § 97; RRS § 2152.]
2023 Revised Code of Washington › Title 10 - Criminal Procedure › Chapter 10.58 - Evidence. › 10.58.020 - Presumption of innocence—Conviction of lowest degree, when.

RCW 10.58.020
Presumption of innocence—Conviction of lowest degree, when.
Every person charged with the commission of a crime shall be presumed innocent until the contrary is proved by competent evidence beyond a reasonable doubt; and when an offense has been proved against him or her, and there exists a reasonable doubt as to which of two or more degrees he or she is guilty, he or she shall be convicted only of the lowest.
[ 2010 c 8 § 1053; 1909 c 249 § 56; 1891 c 28 § 91; Code 1881 § 767; 1854 p 76 § 3; RRS § 2308. Formerly RCW 10.58.020 and 10.61.020.]
NOTES:
Conviction of attempts or lesser or included crimes: RCW 10.61.003, 10.61.006, 10.61.010.
2023 Revised Code of Washington › Title 10 - Criminal Procedure › Chapter 10.58 - Evidence. › 10.58.030 - Confession as evidence.

RCW 10.58.030
Confession as evidence.
The confession of a defendant made under inducement, with all the circumstances, may be given as evidence against him or her, except when made under the influence of fear produced by threats; but a confession made under inducement is not sufficient to warrant a conviction without corroborating testimony.
[ 2010 c 8 § 1054; Code 1881 § 1070; 1873 p 234 § 232; 1854 p 117 § 96; RRS § 2151.]
2023 Revised Code of Washington › Title 10 - Criminal Procedure › Chapter 10.58 - Evidence. › 10.58.035 - Statement of defendant—Admissibility.

RCW 10.58.035
Statement of defendant—Admissibility.
(1) In criminal and juvenile offense proceedings where independent proof of the corpus delicti is absent, and the alleged victim of the crime is dead or incompetent to testify, a lawfully obtained and otherwise admissible confession, admission, or other statement of the defendant shall be admissible into evidence if there is substantial independent evidence that would tend to establish the trustworthiness of the confession, admission, or other statement of the defendant.
(2) In determining whether there is substantial independent evidence that the confession, admission, or other statement of the defendant is trustworthy, the court shall consider, but is not limited to:
(a) Whether there is any evidence corroborating or contradicting the facts set out in the statement, including the elements of the offense;
(b) The character of the witness reporting the statement and the number of witnesses to the statement;
(c) Whether a record of the statement was made and the timing of the making of the record in relation to the making of the statement; and/or
(d) The relationship between the witness and the defendant.
(3) Where the court finds that the confession, admission, or other statement of the defendant is sufficiently trustworthy to be admitted, the court shall issue a written order setting forth the rationale for admission.
(4) Nothing in this section may be construed to prevent the defendant from arguing to the jury or judge in a bench trial that the statement is not trustworthy or that the evidence is otherwise insufficient to convict.
[ 2003 c 179 § 1.]
2023 Revised Code of Washington › Title 10 - Criminal Procedure › Chapter 10.58 - Evidence. › 10.58.038 - Polygraph examinations—Victims of alleged sex offenses.

RCW 10.58.038
Polygraph examinations—Victims of alleged sex offenses.
A law enforcement officer, prosecuting attorney, or other government official may not ask or require a victim of an alleged sex offense to submit to a polygraph examination or other truth telling device as a condition for proceeding with the investigation of the offense. The refusal of a victim to submit to a polygraph examination or other truth telling device shall not by itself prevent the investigation, charging, or prosecution of the offense. For the purposes of this section, "sex offense" is any offense under chapter 9A.44 RCW.
[ 2007 c 202 § 1.]
2023 Revised Code of Washington › Title 10 - Criminal Procedure › Chapter 10.58 - Evidence. › 10.58.040 - Intent to defraud.

RCW 10.58.040
Intent to defraud.
Whenever an intent to defraud shall be made an element of an offense, it shall be sufficient if an intent appears to defraud any person, association or body politic or corporate whatsoever.
[ 1909 c 249 § 40; RRS § 2292.]
2023 Revised Code of Washington › Title 10 - Criminal Procedure › Chapter 10.58 - Evidence. › 10.58.060 - Ownership—Proof of.

RCW 10.58.060
Ownership—Proof of.
In the prosecution of any offense committed upon, or in relation to, or in any way affecting any real estate, or any offense committed in stealing, embezzling, destroying, injuring, or fraudulently receiving or concealing any money, goods, or other personal estate, it shall be sufficient, and shall not be deemed a variance, if it be proved on trial that at the time when such offense was committed, either the actual or constructive possession, or the general or special property in the whole, or any part of such real or personal estate, was in the person or community alleged in the indictment or other accusation to be the owner thereof.
[Code 1881 § 963; 1854 p 99 § 133; RRS § 2156.]
NOTES:
Indictment or information, certain defects or imperfections deemed immaterial: RCW 10.37.056.
2023 Revised Code of Washington › Title 10 - Criminal Procedure › Chapter 10.58 - Evidence. › 10.58.080 - View of place of crime permissible.

RCW 10.58.080
View of place of crime permissible.
The court may order a view by any jury impaneled to try a criminal case.
[Code 1881 § 1090; 1873 p 237 § 251; 1854 p 120 § 115; RRS § 2160.]
2023 Revised Code of Washington › Title 10 - Criminal Procedure › Chapter 10.61 - Verdicts. › 10.61.003 - Degree offenses—Inferior degree—Attempt.

RCW 10.61.003
Degree offenses—Inferior degree—Attempt.
Upon an indictment or information for an offense consisting of different degrees, the jury may find the defendant not guilty of the degree charged in the indictment or information, and guilty of any degree inferior thereto, or of an attempt to commit the offense.
[ 1891 c 28 § 75; Code 1881 § 1097; 1854 p 120 § 122; RRS § 2167. Formerly RCW 10.61.010, part.] [SLC-RO-11]
NOTES:
Where doubt as to degree, conviction of lowest: RCW 10.58.020.
2023 Revised Code of Washington › Title 10 - Criminal Procedure › Chapter 10.61 - Verdicts. › 10.61.006 - Other cases—Included offenses.

RCW 10.61.006
Other cases—Included offenses.
In all other cases the defendant may be found guilty of an offense the commission of which is necessarily included within that with which he or she is charged in the indictment or information.
[ 2010 c 8 § 1055; 1891 c 28 § 76; Code 1881 § 1098; 1854 p 120 § 123; RRS § 2168. Formerly RCW 10.61.010, part.] [SLC-RO-11]
2023 Revised Code of Washington › Title 10 - Criminal Procedure › Chapter 10.61 - Verdicts. › 10.61.010 - Conviction of lesser crime.

RCW 10.61.010
Conviction of lesser crime.
Upon the trial of an indictment or information, the defendant may be convicted of the crime charged therein, or of a lesser degree of the same crime, or of an attempt to commit the crime so charged, or of an attempt to commit a lesser degree of the same crime. Whenever the jury shall find a verdict of guilty against a person so charged, they shall in their verdict specify the degree or attempt of which the accused is guilty.
[ 1909 c 249 § 11; RRS § 2263. FORMER PARTS OF SECTION: (i) 1891 c 28 § 75; Code 1881 § 1097; 1854 p 120 § 122; RRS § 2167, now codified as RCW 10.61.003. (ii) 1891 c 28 § 76; Code 1881 § 1098; 1854 p 120 § 123; RRS § 2168, now codified as RCW 10.61.006.] [SLC-RO-11]
2023 Revised Code of Washington › Title 10 - Criminal Procedure › Chapter 10.61 - Verdicts. › 10.61.035 - Conviction or acquittal—Several defendants.

RCW 10.61.035
Conviction or acquittal—Several defendants.
Upon an indictment or information against several defendants any one or more may be convicted or acquitted.
[ 1891 c 28 § 37; Code 1881 § 1022; 1873 p 228 § 205; 1869 p 243 § 200; RRS § 2073. Formerly RCW 10.61.030, part.]
NOTES:
Rules of court: This section superseded in part by CrR 6.16. See comment after CrR 6.16.
Discharging defendant to give evidence: RCW 10.46.110.
2023 Revised Code of Washington › Title 10 - Criminal Procedure › Chapter 10.61 - Verdicts. › 10.61.060 - Reconsideration of verdict.

RCW 10.61.060
Reconsideration of verdict.
When there is a verdict of conviction in which it appears to the court that the jury have mistaken the law, the court may explain the reason for that opinion, and direct the jury to reconsider the verdict; and if after such reconsideration they return the same verdict it must be entered, but it shall be good cause for new trial. When there is a verdict of acquittal the court cannot require the jury to reconsider it.
[ 1891 c 28 § 78; Code 1881 § 1100; 1873 p 239 § 261; 1854 p 121 § 125; RRS § 2170.]
2023 Revised Code of Washington › Title 10 - Criminal Procedure › Chapter 10.64 - Judgments and Sentences. › 10.64.015 - Judgment to include costs—Exception.

RCW 10.64.015
Judgment to include costs—Exception.
When the defendant is found guilty, the court shall render judgment accordingly, and the defendant may be liable for all costs, unless the court or jury trying the cause expressly find otherwise. The court shall not order a defendant to pay costs, as described in RCW 10.01.160, if the court finds that the person at the time of sentencing is indigent as defined in RCW 10.01.160(3).
[ 2022 c 260 § 11; 2018 c 269 § 10; Code 1881 § 1104; 1873 p 241 § 272; 1854 p 121 § 129; RRS § 2187. Formerly RCW 10.64.010, part.]
NOTES:
Construction—Effective date—2022 c 260: See notes following RCW 3.66.120.
Construction—2018 c 269: See note following RCW 10.82.090.
Requiring defendant to pay costs—Procedure: RCW 10.01.160, 10.01.170, chapter 10.82 RCW.
2023 Revised Code of Washington › Title 10 - Criminal Procedure › Chapter 10.64 - Judgments and Sentences. › 10.64.025 - Detention of defendant.

RCW 10.64.025
Detention of defendant.
(1) A defendant who has been found guilty of a felony and is awaiting sentencing shall be detained unless the court finds by clear and convincing evidence that the defendant is not likely to flee or to pose a danger to the safety of any other person or the community if released. Any bail bond that was posted on behalf of a defendant shall, upon the defendant's conviction, be exonerated.
(2) A defendant who has been found guilty of one of the following offenses shall be detained pending sentencing: Rape in the first or second degree (RCW 9A.44.040 and 9A.44.050); rape of a child in the first, second, or third degree (RCW 9A.44.073, 9A.44.076, and 9A.44.079); child molestation in the first, second, or third degree (RCW 9A.44.083, 9A.44.086, and 9A.44.089); sexual misconduct with a minor in the first or second degree (RCW 9A.44.093 and 9A.44.096); indecent liberties (RCW 9A.44.100); incest (RCW 9A.64.020); luring (RCW 9A.40.090); human trafficking in the first or second degree (RCW 9A.40.100); promoting commercial sexual abuse of a minor (RCW 9.68A.101); any class A or B felony that is a sexually motivated offense as defined in RCW 9.94A.030; a felony violation of RCW 9.68A.090; or any offense that is, under chapter 9A.28 RCW, a criminal attempt, solicitation, or conspiracy to commit one of those offenses.
[ 2011 c 111 § 4; 1996 c 275 § 10; 1989 c 276 § 2.]
NOTES:
Finding—1996 c 275: See note following RCW 9.94A.505.
Severability—1989 c 276: See note following RCW 9.95.062.
2023 Revised Code of Washington › Title 10 - Criminal Procedure › Chapter 10.64 - Judgments and Sentences. › 10.64.027 - Conditions of release.

RCW 10.64.027
Conditions of release.
In order to minimize the trauma to the victim, the court may attach conditions on release of a defendant under RCW 10.64.025 regarding the whereabouts of the defendant, contact with the victim, or other conditions.
[ 1989 c 276 § 5.]
NOTES:
Severability—1989 c 276: See note following RCW 9.95.062.
2023 Revised Code of Washington › Title 10 - Criminal Procedure › Chapter 10.64 - Judgments and Sentences. › 10.64.060 - Form of sentence to penitentiary.

RCW 10.64.060
Form of sentence to penitentiary.
In every case where imprisonment in the penitentiary is awarded against any convict, the form of the sentence shall be, that he or she be punished by confinement at hard labor; and he or she may also be sentenced to solitary imprisonment for such term as the court shall direct, not exceeding twenty days at any one time; and in the execution of such punishment the solitary shall precede the punishment by hard labor, unless the court shall otherwise order.
[ 2010 c 8 § 1056; Code 1881 § 1127; 1873 p 243 § 285; 1854 p 124 § 149; RRS § 2208.]
NOTES:
Indeterminate sentences: Chapter 9.95 RCW.
Sentencing, 1981 act: Chapter 9.94A RCW.
2023 Revised Code of Washington › Title 10 - Criminal Procedure › Chapter 10.64 - Judgments and Sentences. › 10.64.070 - Recognizance to maintain good behavior or keep the peace.

RCW 10.64.070
Recognizance to maintain good behavior or keep the peace.
Every court before whom any person shall be convicted upon an indictment or information for an offense not punishable with death or imprisonment in the penitentiary may, in addition to the punishment prescribed by law, require such person to recognize with sufficient sureties in a reasonable sum to keep the peace, or to be of good behavior, or both, for any term not exceeding one year, and to stand committed until he or she shall so recognize.
[ 2010 c 8 § 1057; 1891 c 28 § 83; Code 1881 § 1121; 1873 p 242 § 279; 1854 p 123 § 143; RRS § 2202. FORMER PART OF SECTION: Code 1881 § 1122; 1873 p 242 § 280; 1854 p 123 § 144; RRS § 2203, now codified as RCW 10.64.075.]
2023 Revised Code of Washington › Title 10 - Criminal Procedure › Chapter 10.64 - Judgments and Sentences. › 10.64.075 - Breach of recognizance conditions.

RCW 10.64.075
Breach of recognizance conditions.
In case of the breach of the conditions of any such recognizance, the same proceedings shall be had that are by law prescribed in relation to recognizances to keep the peace.
[Code 1881 § 1122; 1873 p 242 § 280; 1854 p 123 § 144; RRS § 2203. Formerly RCW 10.64.070, part.]
2023 Revised Code of Washington › Title 10 - Criminal Procedure › Chapter 10.64 - Judgments and Sentences. › 10.64.080 - Judgments a lien on realty.

RCW 10.64.080
Judgments a lien on realty.
Judgments for fines in all criminal actions rendered, are, and may be made liens upon the real estate of the defendant in the same manner, and with like effect as judgments in civil actions.
[Code 1881 § 1111; RRS § 2188.]
2023 Revised Code of Washington › Title 10 - Criminal Procedure › Chapter 10.64 - Judgments and Sentences. › 10.64.100 - Final record—What to contain.

RCW 10.64.100
Final record—What to contain.
The clerk of the court shall make a final record of all the proceedings in a criminal prosecution within six months after the same shall have been decided, which shall contain a copy of the minutes of the challenge to the panel of the grand jury, the indictment or information, journal entries, pleadings, minutes of challenges to panel of petit jurors, judgment, orders, or decision, and bill of exceptions.
[ 1891 c 28 § 85; Code 1881 § 1134; 1873 p 245 § 292; 1854 p 125 § 156; RRS § 2224.]
2023 Revised Code of Washington › Title 10 - Criminal Procedure › Chapter 10.64 - Judgments and Sentences. › 10.64.110 - Fingerprint of defendant in felony convictions.

RCW 10.64.110
Fingerprint of defendant in felony convictions.
(1) Following June 15, 1977, except as provided in subsection (3) of this section, there shall be affixed to the original of every judgment and sentence of a felony conviction in every court in this state and every order adjudicating a juvenile to be a delinquent based upon conduct which would be a felony if committed by an adult, a fingerprint of the defendant or juvenile who is the subject of the order. When requested by the clerk of the court, the actual affixing of fingerprints shall be done by a representative of the office of the county sheriff.
(2) The clerk of the court shall attest that the fingerprints appearing on the judgment in sentence, order of adjudication of delinquency, or docket, is that of the individual who is the subject of the judgment or conviction, order, or docket entry.
(3) Amended judgment and sentences issued pursuant to State v. Blake, No. 96873-0 (Feb. 25, 2021), are exempt from the fingerprinting requirements in subsection (1) of this section when there are no additional offenses of conviction from the original judgment and sentence and the defendant is in custody in a correctional facility. In such cases, the amended judgment and sentence shall reference the original judgment and sentence and the fingerprints affixed thereto.
[ 2021 c 311 § 20; 1977 ex.s. c 259 § 1.]
NOTES:
Effective date—2021 c 311 §§ 1-11 and 13-21: See note following RCW 71.24.115.
2023 Revised Code of Washington › Title 10 - Criminal Procedure › Chapter 10.64 - Judgments and Sentences. › 10.64.120 - Referral assessments—Probation department oversight committee.

RCW 10.64.120
Referral assessments—Probation department oversight committee.
(1) Every judge of a court of limited jurisdiction shall have the authority to levy upon a person a monthly assessment not to exceed one hundred dollars for services provided whenever the person is referred by the court to the misdemeanant probation department for evaluation or supervision services. The assessment may also be made by a judge in superior court when such misdemeanor or gross misdemeanor cases are heard in the superior court. Nothing in this subsection prevents contracting jurisdictions under RCW 39.34.180(6) from agreeing to the division of moneys received for probation supervision services.
(2) For the purposes of this section the administrative office of the courts shall define a probation department and adopt rules for the qualifications of probation officers based on occupational and educational requirements developed by an oversight committee. This oversight committee shall include a representative from the district and municipal court judges' association, the misdemeanant corrections association, the administrative office of the courts, and associations of cities and counties. The oversight committee shall consider qualifications that provide the training and education necessary to (a) conduct presentencing and postsentencing background investigations, including sentencing recommendations to the court regarding jail terms, alternatives to incarceration, and conditions of release; and (b) provide ongoing supervision and assessment of offenders' needs and the risk they pose to the community.
(3) It shall be the responsibility of the probation services office to implement local procedures approved by the court of limited jurisdiction to ensure collection and payment of such fees into the general fund of the city or county treasury.
(4) Revenues raised under this section shall be used to fund programs for probation services and shall be in addition to those funds provided in RCW 3.62.050.
(5) Assessments and fees levied upon a probationer under this section must be suspended while the probationer is being supervised by another state under RCW 9.94A.745, the interstate compact for adult offender supervision.
[ 2021 c 41 § 4. Prior: 2005 c 400 § 7; 2005 c 282 § 22; 1996 c 298 § 6; 1991 c 247 § 3; 1982 c 207 § 4.]
NOTES:
Application—Effective date—2005 c 400: See notes following RCW 9.94A.74504.
2023 Revised Code of Washington › Title 10 - Criminal Procedure › Chapter 10.64 - Judgments and Sentences. › 10.64.140 - Loss of voting rights—Acknowledgment.

RCW 10.64.140
Loss of voting rights—Acknowledgment.
(1) When a person is convicted of a felony and sentenced to a term of total confinement under the jurisdiction of the department of corrections, the court shall require the defendant to sign a statement acknowledging that:
(a) The defendant's right to vote has been lost due to the felony conviction and sentence to a term of total confinement;
(b) If the defendant is registered to vote, the voter registration will be canceled;
(c) The right to vote is automatically restored as long as the defendant is not serving a sentence of total confinement under the jurisdiction of the department of corrections;
(d) The defendant must reregister before voting; and
(e) Voting before the right is restored is a class C felony under RCW 29A.84.660.
(2) For the purposes of this section:
(a) A sentence of total confinement does not include confinement imposed as a sanction for a community custody violation under RCW 9.94A.633(1).
(b) "Total confinement" has the same meaning as in RCW 9.94A.030.
[ 2021 c 10 § 5; 2009 c 325 § 5; 2005 c 246 § 1.]
NOTES:
Effective date—2021 c 10: See note following RCW 29A.08.520.
Effective date—2005 c 246: "This act takes effect January 1, 2006." [ 2005 c 246 § 26.]
2023 Revised Code of Washington › Title 10 - Criminal Procedure › Chapter 10.66 - Drug Traffickers—Off-Limits Orders. › 10.66.005 - Findings.

RCW 10.66.005
Findings.
The legislature finds that drug abuse is escalating at an alarming rate. New protections need to be established to address this drug crisis which is threatening every stratum of our society. Prohibiting known drug traffickers from frequenting areas for continuous drug activity is one means of addressing this pervasive problem.
[ 1989 c 271 § 213.]
2023 Revised Code of Washington › Title 10 - Criminal Procedure › Chapter 10.66 - Drug Traffickers—Off-Limits Orders. › 10.66.010 - Definitions.

RCW 10.66.010
Definitions.
Unless the context clearly requires otherwise, the definitions in this section apply throughout this chapter:
(1) "Applicant" means any person who owns, occupies, or has a substantial interest in property, or who is a neighbor to property which is adversely affected by drug trafficking, including:
(a) A "family or household member" or "intimate partner" as defined in RCW 7.105.010, who has a possessory interest in a residence as an owner or tenant, at least as great as a known drug trafficker's interest;
(b) An owner or lessor;
(c) An owner, tenant, or resident who lives or works in a designated PADT area; or
(d) A city or prosecuting attorney for any jurisdiction in this state where drug trafficking is occurring.
(2) "Drug" or "drugs" means a controlled substance as defined in chapter 69.50 RCW or an "imitation controlled substance" as defined in RCW 69.52.020.
(3) "Known drug trafficker" means any person who has been convicted of a drug offense in this state, another state, or federal court who subsequently has been arrested for a drug offense in this state. For purposes of this definition, "drug offense" means a felony violation of chapter 69.50 or 69.52 RCW or equivalent law in another jurisdiction that involves the manufacture, distribution, or possession with intent to manufacture or distribute of a controlled substance or imitation controlled substance.
(4) "Off-limits orders" means an order issued by a superior or district court in the state of Washington that enjoins known drug traffickers from entering or remaining in a designated PADT area.
(5) "Protected against drug trafficking area" or "PADT area" means any specifically described area, public or private, contained in an off-limits order. The perimeters of a PADT area shall be defined using street names and numbers and shall include all real property contained therein, where drug sales, possession of drugs, pedestrian or vehicular traffic attendant to drug activity, or other activity associated with drug offenses confirms a pattern associated with drug trafficking. The area may include the full width of streets, alleys and sidewalks on the perimeter, common areas, planting strips, or parks and parking areas within the area described using the streets as boundaries.
[ 2021 c 215 § 119; 2020 c 29 § 11; 1989 c 271 § 214.]
NOTES:
Effective date—2022 c 268; 2021 c 215: See note following RCW 7.105.900.
Effective date—2020 c 29: See note following RCW 7.77.060.
2023 Revised Code of Washington › Title 10 - Criminal Procedure › Chapter 10.66 - Drug Traffickers—Off-Limits Orders. › 10.66.020 - When order may be issued.

RCW 10.66.020
When order may be issued.
A court may enter an off-limits order enjoining a known drug trafficker who has been associated with drug trafficking in an area that the court finds to be a PADT area, from entering or remaining in a designated PADT area for up to one year. This relief may be ordered pursuant to applications for injunctive relief or as part of a criminal proceeding as follows:
(1) In a civil action, including an action brought under this chapter;
(2) In a nuisance abatement action pursuant to chapter 7.43 RCW;
(3) In an eviction action to exclude known drug traffickers or tenants who were evicted for allowing drug trafficking to occur on the premises which were the subject of the eviction action;
(4) As a condition of pretrial release of a known drug trafficker awaiting trial on drug charges. The order shall be in effect until the time of sentencing or dismissal of the criminal charges; or
(5) As a condition of sentencing of any known drug trafficker convicted of a drug offense. The order may include all periods of community placement or community supervision.
[ 1989 c 271 § 215.]
2023 Revised Code of Washington › Title 10 - Criminal Procedure › Chapter 10.66 - Drug Traffickers—Off-Limits Orders. › 10.66.030 - Hearing—Summons.

RCW 10.66.030
Hearing—Summons.
Upon the filing of an application for an off-limits order under RCW 10.66.020 (1), (2), or (3), the court shall set a hearing fourteen days from the filing of the application, or as soon thereafter as the hearing can be scheduled. If the respondent has not already been served with a summons, the application shall be served on the respondent not less than five court days before the hearing. If timely service cannot be made, the court may set a new hearing date.
[ 1989 c 271 § 216.]
2023 Revised Code of Washington › Title 10 - Criminal Procedure › Chapter 10.66 - Drug Traffickers—Off-Limits Orders. › 10.66.040 - Ex parte temporary order—Hearing—Notice.

RCW 10.66.040
Ex parte temporary order—Hearing—Notice.
Upon filing an application for an off-limits order under this chapter, an applicant may obtain an ex parte temporary off-limits order, with or without notice, only upon a showing that serious or irreparable harm will result to the applicant if the temporary off-limits order is not granted. An ex parte temporary off-limits order shall be effective for a fixed period not to exceed fourteen days, but the court may reissue the order upon a showing of good cause. A hearing on a one-year off-limits order, as provided in this chapter, shall be set for fourteen days from the issuance of the temporary order. The respondent shall be personally served with a copy of the temporary off-limits order along with a copy of the application and notice of the date set for the full hearing. At the hearing, if the court finds that respondent is a known drug trafficker who has engaged in drug trafficking in a particular area, and that the area is associated with a pattern of drug activities, the court shall issue a one-year off-limits order prohibiting the respondent from having any contact with the PADT area. At any time within three months before the expiration of the order, the applicant may apply for a renewal of the order by filing a new petition under this chapter.
[ 1989 c 271 § 217.]
2023 Revised Code of Washington › Title 10 - Criminal Procedure › Chapter 10.66 - Drug Traffickers—Off-Limits Orders. › 10.66.050 - Additional relief—PADT area.

RCW 10.66.050
Additional relief—PADT area.
In granting a temporary off-limits order or a one-year off-limits order, the court shall have discretion to grant additional relief as the court considers proper to achieve the purposes of this chapter. The PADT area defined in any off-limits order must be reasonably related to the area or areas impacted by the unlawful drug activity as described by the applicant in any civil action under RCW 10.66.020 (1), (2), or (3). The court in its discretion may allow a respondent, who is the subject of any order issued under RCW 10.66.020 as part of a civil or criminal proceeding, to enter an off-limits area or areas for health or employment reasons, subject to conditions prescribed by the court. Upon request, a certified copy of the order shall be provided to the applicant by the clerk of the court.
[ 1999 c 143 § 46; 1989 c 271 § 218.]
2023 Revised Code of Washington › Title 10 - Criminal Procedure › Chapter 10.66 - Drug Traffickers—Off-Limits Orders. › 10.66.060 - Bond or security.

RCW 10.66.060
Bond or security.
A temporary off-limits order or a one-year off-limits order may not issue under this chapter except upon the giving of a bond or security by the applicant. The court shall set the bond or security in the amount the court deems proper, but not less than one thousand dollars, for the payment of costs and damages that may be incurred by any party who is found to have been wrongfully restrained or enjoined. A bond or security shall not be required of the state of Washington, municipal corporations, or political subdivisions of the state of Washington.
[ 1989 c 271 § 219.]
2023 Revised Code of Washington › Title 10 - Criminal Procedure › Chapter 10.66 - Drug Traffickers—Off-Limits Orders. › 10.66.080 - Notice of order to law enforcement agency.

RCW 10.66.080
Notice of order to law enforcement agency.
A copy of an off-limits order granted under this chapter shall be forwarded by the court to the local law enforcement agency with jurisdiction over the PADT area specified in the order on or before the next judicial day following issuance of the order. Upon receipt of the order, the law enforcement agency shall promptly enter it into an appropriate law enforcement information system.
[ 1989 c 271 § 221.]
2023 Revised Code of Washington › Title 10 - Criminal Procedure › Chapter 10.66 - Drug Traffickers—Off-Limits Orders. › 10.66.090 - Penalties.

RCW 10.66.090
Penalties.
(1) A person who willfully disobeys an off-limits order issued under this chapter is guilty of a gross misdemeanor.
(2) A person is guilty of a class C felony punishable according to chapter 9A.20 RCW if the person willfully disobeys an off-limits order in violation of the terms of the order and also either:
(a) Enters or remains in a PADT area that is within one thousand feet of any school; or
(b) Is convicted of a second or subsequent violation of this chapter.
[ 2003 c 53 § 93; 1989 c 271 § 223.]
NOTES:
Intent—Effective date—2003 c 53: See notes following RCW 2.48.180.
2023 Revised Code of Washington › Title 10 - Criminal Procedure › Chapter 10.66 - Drug Traffickers—Off-Limits Orders. › 10.66.100 - Additional penalties.

RCW 10.66.100
Additional penalties.
Any person who willfully disobeys an off-limits order issued under this chapter shall be subject to criminal penalties as provided in this chapter and may also be found in contempt of court and subject to penalties under chapter 7.21 RCW.
[ 1999 c 143 § 47; 1989 c 271 § 222.]
2023 Revised Code of Washington › Title 10 - Criminal Procedure › Chapter 10.66 - Drug Traffickers—Off-Limits Orders. › 10.66.110 - Jurisdiction.

RCW 10.66.110
Jurisdiction.
The superior courts shall have jurisdiction of all civil actions and all felony criminal proceedings brought under this chapter. Courts of limited jurisdiction shall have jurisdiction of all misdemeanor and gross misdemeanor criminal actions brought under this chapter.
[ 1989 c 271 § 224.]
2023 Revised Code of Washington › Title 10 - Criminal Procedure › Chapter 10.66 - Drug Traffickers—Off-Limits Orders. › 10.66.120 - Venue.

RCW 10.66.120
Venue.
For the purposes of this chapter, an action may be brought in any county in which any element of the alleged drug trafficking activities occurred.
[ 1989 c 271 § 225.]
2023 Revised Code of Washington › Title 10 - Criminal Procedure › Chapter 10.66 - Drug Traffickers—Off-Limits Orders. › 10.66.130 - Modification of order—Notice to law enforcement agency.

RCW 10.66.130
Modification of order—Notice to law enforcement agency.
Upon application, notice to all parties, and a hearing, the court may modify the terms of an off-limits order. When an order is terminated, modified, or amended before its expiration date, the clerk of the court shall forward, on or before the next judicial day, a true copy of the amended order to the law enforcement agency specified in the order. Upon receipt of an order, the law enforcement agency shall promptly enter it into an appropriate law enforcement information system.
[ 1989 c 271 § 226.]
2023 Revised Code of Washington › Title 10 - Criminal Procedure › Chapter 10.70 - Commitments. › 10.70.010 - Commitment until fine and costs are paid.

RCW 10.70.010
Commitment until fine and costs are paid.
When the defendant is adjudged to pay a fine and costs, the court shall order him or her to be committed to the custody of the sheriff until the fine and costs are paid or secured as provided by law.
[ 2010 c 8 § 1058; Code 1881 § 1119; 1873 p 242 § 277; 1854 p 123 § 141; RRS § 2200.]
NOTES:
Commitment for failure to pay fine and costs—Execution against defendant's property: RCW 10.82.030.
Stay of execution for sixty days on recognizance: RCW 10.82.020, 10.82.025.
2023 Revised Code of Washington › Title 10 - Criminal Procedure › Chapter 10.70 - Commitments. › 10.70.020 - Mittimus upon sentence to imprisonment.

RCW 10.70.020
Mittimus upon sentence to imprisonment.
When any person shall be sentenced to be imprisoned in the penitentiary or county jail, the clerk of the court shall, as soon as may be, make out and deliver to the sheriff of the county, or his or her deputy, a transcript from the minutes of the court of such conviction and sentence, duly certified by such clerk, which shall be sufficient authority for such sheriff to execute the sentence, who shall execute it accordingly.
[ 2010 c 8 § 1059; Code 1881 § 1126; 1873 p 243 § 284; 1854 p 124 § 148; RRS § 2207.]
2023 Revised Code of Washington › Title 10 - Criminal Procedure › Chapter 10.73 - Criminal Appeals. › 10.73.040 - Bail pending appeal.

RCW 10.73.040
Bail pending appeal.
In all criminal actions, except capital cases in which the proof of guilt is clear or the presumption great, upon an appeal being taken from a judgment of conviction, the court in which the judgment was rendered, or a judge thereof, must, by an order entered in the journal or filed with the clerk, fix and determine the amount of bail to be required of the appellant; and the appellant shall be committed until a bond to the state of Washington in the sum so fixed be executed on his or her behalf by at least two sureties possessing the qualifications required for sureties on appeal bonds, such bond to be conditioned that the appellant shall appear whenever required, and stand to and abide by the judgment or orders of the appellate court, and any judgment and order of the superior court that may be rendered or made in pursuance thereof. If the appellant be already at large on bail, his or her sureties shall be liable to the amount of their bond, in the same manner and upon the same conditions as if they had executed the bond prescribed by this section; but the court may by order require a new bond in a larger amount or with new sureties, and may commit the appellant until the order be complied with.
[ 2010 c 8 § 1060; 1999 c 143 § 48; 1893 c 61 § 31; RRS § 1747.]
2023 Revised Code of Washington › Title 10 - Criminal Procedure › Chapter 10.73 - Criminal Appeals. › 10.73.090 - Collateral attack—One year time limit.

RCW 10.73.090
Collateral attack—One year time limit.
(1) No petition or motion for collateral attack on a judgment and sentence in a criminal case may be filed more than one year after the judgment becomes final if the judgment and sentence is valid on its face and was rendered by a court of competent jurisdiction.
(2) For the purposes of this section, "collateral attack" means any form of postconviction relief other than a direct appeal. "Collateral attack" includes, but is not limited to, a personal restraint petition, a habeas corpus petition, a motion to vacate judgment, a motion to withdraw guilty plea, a motion for a new trial, and a motion to arrest judgment.
(3) For the purposes of this section, a judgment becomes final on the last of the following dates:
(a) The date it is filed with the clerk of the trial court;
(b) The date that an appellate court issues its mandate disposing of a timely direct appeal from the conviction; or
(c) The date that the United States Supreme Court denies a timely petition for certiorari to review a decision affirming the conviction on direct appeal. The filing of a motion to reconsider denial of certiorari does not prevent a judgment from becoming final.
[ 1989 c 395 § 1.]
2023 Revised Code of Washington › Title 10 - Criminal Procedure › Chapter 10.73 - Criminal Appeals. › 10.73.100 - Collateral attack—When one year limit not applicable.

RCW 10.73.100
Collateral attack—When one year limit not applicable.
The time limit specified in RCW 10.73.090 does not apply to a petition or motion that is based solely on one or more of the following grounds:
(1) Newly discovered evidence, if the defendant acted with reasonable diligence in discovering the evidence and filing the petition or motion;
(2) The statute that the defendant was convicted of violating was unconstitutional on its face or as applied to the defendant's conduct;
(3) The conviction was barred by double jeopardy under Amendment V of the United States Constitution or Article I, section 9 of the state Constitution;
(4) The defendant pled not guilty and the evidence introduced at trial was insufficient to support the conviction;
(5) The sentence imposed was in excess of the court's jurisdiction; or
(6) There has been a significant change in the law, whether substantive or procedural, which is material to the conviction, sentence, or other order entered in a criminal or civil proceeding instituted by the state or local government, and either the legislature has expressly provided that the change in the law is to be applied retroactively, or a court, in interpreting a change in the law that lacks express legislative intent regarding retroactive application, determines that sufficient reasons exist to require retroactive application of the changed legal standard.
[ 1989 c 395 § 2.]
2023 Revised Code of Washington › Title 10 - Criminal Procedure › Chapter 10.73 - Criminal Appeals. › 10.73.110 - Collateral attack—One year time limit—Duty of court to advise defendant.

RCW 10.73.110
Collateral attack—One year time limit—Duty of court to advise defendant.
At the time judgment and sentence is pronounced in a criminal case, the court shall advise the defendant of the time limit specified in RCW 10.73.090 and 10.73.100.
[ 1989 c 395 § 4.]
2023 Revised Code of Washington › Title 10 - Criminal Procedure › Chapter 10.73 - Criminal Appeals. › 10.73.120 - Collateral attack—One year time limit—Duty of department of corrections to advise.

RCW 10.73.120
Collateral attack—One year time limit—Duty of department of corrections to advise.
As soon as practicable after July 23, 1989, the department of corrections shall attempt to advise the following persons of the time limit specified in RCW 10.73.090 and 10.73.100: Every person who, on July 23, 1989, is serving a term of incarceration, probation, parole, or community supervision pursuant to conviction of a felony.
[ 1989 c 395 § 5.]
2023 Revised Code of Washington › Title 10 - Criminal Procedure › Chapter 10.73 - Criminal Appeals. › 10.73.130 - Collateral attack—One year time limit—Applicability.

RCW 10.73.130
Collateral attack—One year time limit—Applicability.
RCW 10.73.090 and 10.73.100 apply only to petitions and motions filed more than one year after July 23, 1989.
[ 1989 c 395 § 6.]