2023 Texas Statutes › Agriculture Code › Title 2 - Department of Agriculture › Chapter 18 - Certification and Agricultural Product Standards › Subchapter A. Organic Standards and Certification › Section 18.0075. Administrative Procedures

Sec. 18.0075.  ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES.  (a)  To the extent consistent with the requirements of the national organic program, the department by rule shall adopt administrative procedures relating to assessment of administrative penalties and other sanctions for violations of this subchapter.  Chapter 2001, Government Code, does not apply to department rules adopted under this subchapter to the extent that Chapter 2001, Government Code, conflicts with the requirements of the national organic program.
(b)  The department shall provide a person with written notice of the department's intent to assess the person with an administrative penalty or other sanction.  If the department requires a written response to the notice, the department shall allow the person not less than 10 days after the date the person receives the notice to provide the department with the written response.  A written response may contain an admission of a violation of this subchapter or rule adopted under this subchapter, as applicable, and an agreement to assessment of the applicable administrative penalty or sanction.
(c)  The department's administrative procedures may provide for a default judgment without a hearing for failure to submit to the department a written response under Subsection (b) that contains a request for a hearing and a general or specific denial that the department's action is warranted by the facts or law.
(d)  A default judgment may be entered under this section by order of the commissioner.  The order entering a default judgment is final on the day the commissioner issues the order.
(e)  A default judgment may be appealed for review de novo to a Travis County district court not later than the first anniversary of the date the order is issued under Subsection (d).
(f)  On appeal, the court may only consider the issues of whether the appellant received proper notice as required by Subsection (b) and whether the department received a proper response under Subsection (b).  The appellant has the burden of proof to establish, by a preponderance of the evidence, that proper notice was not received by the appellant or that a proper response under Subsection (b) was received by the department.  If the appellant prevails, the default judgment shall be vacated and the case shall be remanded to the department for an administrative hearing on the substantive issues raised by the department's notice.
(g)  The State Office of Administrative Hearings shall conduct any hearing required by a rule of the department adopted under this subchapter.
(h)  In the absence of administrative procedures adopted by the department under this section, the procedures under Chapter 12 and under Chapter 2001, Government Code, apply to the assessment of administrative penalties or license sanctions, except that the procedures may, on motion of a party or on the administrative law judge's own motion, be modified by the judge as necessary to comply with standards and procedures under the national organic program.
Added by Acts 2003, 78th Leg., ch. 1288, Sec. 8, eff. June 21, 2003.