reglab/statecodes huggingface dataset:
2023 Oregon Revised Statutes › Volume : 04 - Criminal Procedure, Crimes › Chapter 131 - Preliminary Provisions; Limitations; Jurisdiction; Venue; Criminal Forfeiture; Crime Prevention › Section 131.585 - Extent of judgment.

(1) The court shall enter judgment to the extent that the property is proceeds of the crime of conviction or of past prohibited conduct that is similar to the crime of conviction.
(2) With respect to property that is an instrumentality of the crime of conviction or of past prohibited conduct that is similar to the crime of conviction, the court shall consider:
(a) Whether the property constitutes the defendant’s lawful livelihood or means of earning a living.
(b) Whether the property is the defendant’s residence.
(c) The degree of relationship between the property and the prohibited conduct, including the extent to which the property facilitated the prohibited conduct or could facilitate future prohibited conduct.
(d) The monetary value of the property in relation to the risk of injury to the public from the prohibited conduct.
(e) The monetary value of the property in relation to the actual injury to the public from the prohibited conduct.
(f) The monetary value of the property in relation to objective measures of the potential or actual criminal culpability of the person or persons engaging in the prohibited conduct, including:
(A) The inherent gravity of the prohibited conduct;
(B) The potential sentence for similar prohibited conduct under Oregon law;
(C) The defendant’s prior criminal history; and
(D) The sentence actually imposed on the defendant.
(g) Any additional relevant evidence. [2005 c.830 §13]
2023 Oregon Revised Statutes › Volume : 04 - Criminal Procedure, Crimes › Chapter 131 - Preliminary Provisions; Limitations; Jurisdiction; Venue; Criminal Forfeiture; Crime Prevention › Section 131.591 - Equitable distribution of property or proceeds; intergovernmental agreements.

Distribution of property or proceeds in accordance with ORS 131.550 to 131.600 must be made equitably and may be made pursuant to intergovernmental agreement under ORS chapter 190. Intergovernmental agreements providing for such distributions and in effect on September 2, 2005, remain valid unless changed by the parties. The equitable distribution of proceeds targeted for law enforcement must involve sharing the proceeds between the seizing agency and forfeiture counsel. [2005 c.830 §15]
2023 Oregon Revised Statutes › Volume : 04 - Criminal Procedure, Crimes › Chapter 131 - Preliminary Provisions; Limitations; Jurisdiction; Venue; Criminal Forfeiture; Crime Prevention › Section 131.600 - Record keeping and reporting requirements.

(1) A seizing agency and any agency that receives forfeited property or proceeds from the sale of forfeited property under ORS 131.550 to 131.600 shall maintain written documentation of each sale, decision to retain, transfer or other disposition of forfeited property.
(2)(a) As soon as practicable following the seizure of property for criminal forfeiture, forfeiture counsel shall file with the Asset Forfeiture Oversight Advisory Committee an electronic report that describes the property seized and the circumstances of the seizure.
(b) As soon as practicable following entry of judgment under ORS 131.588, forfeiture counsel shall file with the committee an electronic report describing the judgment and the manner in which any forfeited property and the proceeds from any sales of forfeited property were distributed.
(3) Law enforcement agencies shall supply to forfeiture counsel all information requested by forfeiture counsel that is necessary for the preparation of the electronic reports required by subsection (2) of this section.
(4) Political subdivisions of this state that receive forfeiture proceeds under ORS 131.594 shall submit an electronic report to the committee for any calendar year in which those proceeds are received. The report must be submitted no later than January 31 of the following year and must describe how the proceeds received by the political subdivision have been or will be used.
(5) The committee may require forfeiture counsel or a political subdivision to include in the electronic reports described in this section any additional information requested by the committee.
(6) The committee shall develop and make available electronic forms for the purposes of the reports described in this section. [2005 c.830 §18; 2011 c.504 §1; 2013 c.9 §1]
2023 Oregon Revised Statutes › Volume : 04 - Criminal Procedure, Crimes › Chapter 131 - Preliminary Provisions; Limitations; Jurisdiction; Venue; Criminal Forfeiture; Crime Prevention › Section 131.604 - Disposition of forfeited cigarettes.

Notwithstanding ORS 131.594 and 131.597, if property forfeited under ORS 131.550 to 131.600 consists of cigarettes forfeited because of a violation of ORS 180.440 (2), the seizing agency shall destroy the cigarettes. [2003 c.801 §16a; 2005 c.830 §29]
2023 Oregon Revised Statutes › Volume : 04 - Criminal Procedure, Crimes › Chapter 131 - Preliminary Provisions; Limitations; Jurisdiction; Venue; Criminal Forfeiture; Crime Prevention › Section 131.605 - Definitions for ORS 131.605 to 131.625.

As used in ORS 131.605 to 131.625, unless the context requires otherwise:
(1) "Crime" has the meaning provided for that term in ORS 161.515.
(2) "Dangerous weapon," "deadly weapon" and "person" have the meanings given those terms in ORS 161.015.
(3) "Frisk" is an external patting of a person’s outer clothing.
(4) "Is about to commit" means unusual conduct that leads a peace officer reasonably to conclude in light of the officer’s training and experience that criminal activity may be afoot.
(5) "Peace officer" has the meaning given that term in ORS 133.005.
(6) "Reasonably suspects" means that a peace officer holds a belief that is reasonable under the totality of the circumstances existing at the time and place the peace officer acts as authorized in ORS 131.605 to 131.625.
(7) A "stop" is a temporary restraint of a person’s liberty by a peace officer lawfully present in any place. [1973 c.836 §30; 1997 c.866 §2; 2011 c.506 §6; 2011 c.644 §12]
2023 Oregon Revised Statutes › Volume : 04 - Criminal Procedure, Crimes › Chapter 131 - Preliminary Provisions; Limitations; Jurisdiction; Venue; Criminal Forfeiture; Crime Prevention › Section 131.615 - Stopping of persons.

(1) A peace officer who reasonably suspects that a person has committed or is about to commit a crime may stop the person and, after informing the person that the peace officer is a peace officer, make a reasonable inquiry.
(2) The detention and inquiry shall be conducted in the vicinity of the stop and for no longer than a reasonable time.
(3) The inquiry shall be considered reasonable if it is limited to:
(a) The immediate circumstances that aroused the officer’s suspicion;
(b) Other circumstances arising during the course of the detention and inquiry that give rise to a reasonable suspicion of criminal activity; and
(c) Ensuring the safety of the officer, the person stopped or other persons present, including an inquiry regarding the presence of weapons.
(4)(a) The inquiry may include a request for consent to search in relation to the circumstances specified in subsection (3) of this section or to search for items of evidence otherwise subject to search or seizure under ORS 133.535 only if the officer first informs the person that the person has the right to refuse the request.
(b) An officer who obtains consent to search under this subsection shall ensure that there is a written, video or audio record that the person gave informed and voluntary consent to search.
(c) This subsection does not apply to implied consent searches described in ORS 813.100, 813.131 or 813.135.
(5) A peace officer making a stop may use the degree of force reasonably necessary to make the stop and ensure the safety of the peace officer, the person stopped or other persons who are present. [1973 c.836 §31; 1997 c.866 §1; 2022 c.78 §1]
2023 Oregon Revised Statutes › Volume : 04 - Criminal Procedure, Crimes › Chapter 131 - Preliminary Provisions; Limitations; Jurisdiction; Venue; Criminal Forfeiture; Crime Prevention › Section 131.625 - Frisk of stopped persons.

(1) A peace officer may frisk a stopped person for dangerous or deadly weapons if the officer reasonably suspects that the person is armed and dangerous to the officer or other persons present.
(2) If, in the course of the frisk, the peace officer feels an object which the peace officer reasonably suspects is a dangerous or deadly weapon, the peace officer may take such action as is reasonably necessary to take possession of the weapon. [1973 c.836 §32; 1997 c.866 §3]
2023 Oregon Revised Statutes › Volume : 04 - Criminal Procedure, Crimes › Chapter 131 - Preliminary Provisions; Limitations; Jurisdiction; Venue; Criminal Forfeiture; Crime Prevention › Section 131.655 - Detention and interrogation of persons suspected of theft committed in a store or unlawful operation of audiovisual device in a motion picture theater; probable cause.

(1) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, a person may be detained in a reasonable manner and for a reasonable time by:
(a) A merchant or merchant’s employee who has probable cause for believing that the person has committed theft of property of a store or other mercantile establishment; or
(b) The owner or lessee of a motion picture theater or authorized agent or employee of the owner or lessee who has probable cause to believe that the person has violated ORS 164.882.
(2) Probable cause is a defense to any civil or criminal action based on detention and interrogation that a person brings against:
(a) A merchant or merchant’s employee who has detained the person in a reasonable manner and for a reasonable time based on probable cause for believing that the person has committed theft of property of a store or other mercantile establishment; or
(b) The owner or lessee of a motion picture theater or authorized agent or employee of the owner or lessee who has detained the person based on probable cause for believing that the person has violated ORS 164.882. [Formerly 133.037; 2005 c.459 §2]
2023 Oregon Revised Statutes › Volume : 04 - Criminal Procedure, Crimes › Chapter 131 - Preliminary Provisions; Limitations; Jurisdiction; Venue; Criminal Forfeiture; Crime Prevention › Section 131.665 - Prevention by public officers.

Crimes may be prevented by the action of public officers in accordance with ORS 131.675, 131.685, 131.705 to 131.735, and as otherwise authorized by law. [1973 c.836 §34a (enacted in lieu of 145.010)]
2023 Oregon Revised Statutes › Volume : 04 - Criminal Procedure, Crimes › Chapter 131 - Preliminary Provisions; Limitations; Jurisdiction; Venue; Criminal Forfeiture; Crime Prevention › Section 131.675 - Dispersal of unlawful assemblages.

When any five or more persons are unlawfully assembled in any county, city, town or village, the sheriff of the county and the deputies of the sheriff, the mayor of the city, town or village, or chief executive officer or officers thereof, may go among the persons assembled, or as near to them as they can with safety, and command them in the name of the State of Oregon to disperse. If, so commanded, they do not immediately disperse, the officer may arrest them or cause them to be arrested for any unlawful activity constituting an offense. [Formerly 145.020; 1987 c.526 §1; 2021 c.250 §1]
2023 Oregon Revised Statutes › Volume : 04 - Criminal Procedure, Crimes › Chapter 131 - Preliminary Provisions; Limitations; Jurisdiction; Venue; Criminal Forfeiture; Crime Prevention › Section 131.685 - Authority of Governor to enter into agreements with other states for crime prevention purposes.

The Governor of Oregon may enter into agreements or compacts with the Governor of any or all the States of Washington, Idaho, California and Nevada, each acting on behalf of the own state of the Governor, in order to effectuate cooperative effort and mutual assistance in the prevention of crime in those states and in the enforcement of their respective criminal laws and policies. [Formerly 145.060]
2023 Oregon Revised Statutes › Volume : 04 - Criminal Procedure, Crimes › Chapter 131 - Preliminary Provisions; Limitations; Jurisdiction; Venue; Criminal Forfeiture; Crime Prevention › Section 131.705 - Definitions for ORS 131.705 to 131.735.

As used in ORS 131.705 to 131.735, unless the context requires otherwise:
(1) "Police" means the municipal police and the county sheriff of the political subdivision in which the public property is located, and the Department of State Police.
(2) "Public official" means the officer or employee who is the administrative head of the board, commission, agency or division or department of this state or any political subdivision therein which has jurisdiction over any public property, or the designate of the officer or employee.
(3) "Public property" means public lands, premises and buildings, including but not limited to any building used in connection with the transaction of public business or any lands, premises or buildings owned or leased by this state or any political subdivision therein. [Formerly 145.610]
2023 Oregon Revised Statutes › Volume : 04 - Criminal Procedure, Crimes › Chapter 131 - Preliminary Provisions; Limitations; Jurisdiction; Venue; Criminal Forfeiture; Crime Prevention › Section 131.715 - Proclamation of emergency period by Governor.

After consultation with the public official, or the designate of the public official, and the police, the Governor may proclaim an emergency period if the Governor finds that there exists on any public property a clear and present danger of injury to persons, damage to property or denial of or substantial interference with ingress or egress from public property. The proclamation shall describe the public property affected by the proclamation. The Governor shall cause the proclamation to be publicized. When the Governor finds that the danger has ended, the Governor shall proclaim the end of the emergency period. [Formerly 145.620]
2023 Oregon Revised Statutes › Volume : 04 - Criminal Procedure, Crimes › Chapter 131 - Preliminary Provisions; Limitations; Jurisdiction; Venue; Criminal Forfeiture; Crime Prevention › Section 131.725 - Exclusion from public property.

(1) During the emergency period proclaimed by the Governor under ORS 131.715, the public official shall order excluded from the public property described in the proclamation such persons who in the judgment of the public official are contributing to or aggravating the danger which the Governor has proclaimed to exist.
(2) After informing the person ordered removed or excluded from the public property of the proclamation and order, the police shall remove or exclude such person from such public property.
(3) Any person who, having been ordered excluded or removed from any public property, knowingly enters thereon or who remains on such property during an emergency period proclaimed by the Governor under ORS 131.715 and who refuses to leave such property upon request by the police, commits a Class A misdemeanor. [Formerly 145.630]
2023 Oregon Revised Statutes › Volume : 04 - Criminal Procedure, Crimes › Chapter 131 - Preliminary Provisions; Limitations; Jurisdiction; Venue; Criminal Forfeiture; Crime Prevention › Section 131.735 - Review of exclusion order.

Any person ordered removed or excluded from any public property under ORS 131.715 and 131.725 shall have immediate access to the circuit court for the county in which the property is located for review of the order of exclusion or removal. Such access shall be in the form of a writ of review and shall be given priority over all other cases on the docket of the circuit court. [Formerly 145.640]
2023 Oregon Revised Statutes › Volume : 04 - Criminal Procedure, Crimes › Chapter 131 - Preliminary Provisions; Limitations; Jurisdiction; Venue; Criminal Forfeiture; Crime Prevention › Section 131.805 - Authority to employ special agents.

The Governor may employ, at such salaries as the Governor deems reasonable for the services rendered, special agents to effect the apprehension and conviction of criminals, the return of fugitives from justice, the investigation of cases in which the Governor believes the laws of the state are being violated, the supervision of persons paroled or conditionally pardoned from the Department of Corrections or the collection of evidence in any case, civil or criminal, in which the state is interested whenever in the judgment of the Governor it is necessary from the conditions existing in any case, whenever the Governor is convinced that criminals are likely to escape punishment and justice cannot be done by the regularly constituted authorities of any county of the state or of the state or whenever any emergency has arisen which in the judgment of the Governor would justify the Governor so doing. [Formerly 148.010; 1987 c.320 §17]
2023 Oregon Revised Statutes › Volume : 04 - Criminal Procedure, Crimes › Chapter 131 - Preliminary Provisions; Limitations; Jurisdiction; Venue; Criminal Forfeiture; Crime Prevention › Section 131.815 - Presentment of facts to circuit court.

Whenever in the opinion of the Governor the criminal laws of the state are not being faithfully executed and enforced and the circumstances justify the appointment of any sheriff, district attorney, constable or justice of the peace pro tem, the Governor shall lay the facts of which the Governor is advised before the circuit court, or any judge thereof, of the district of the office in question. The court or judge shall, without delay, in a summary manner consider the facts so presented and such further facts as can be gathered or may be presented by or on behalf of the Governor, the officer or any party interested. [Formerly 148.110]
2023 Oregon Revised Statutes › Volume : 04 - Criminal Procedure, Crimes › Chapter 131 - Preliminary Provisions; Limitations; Jurisdiction; Venue; Criminal Forfeiture; Crime Prevention › Section 131.825 - Hearing.

The court, or judge thereof, in conducting such hearing, shall have all the usual powers of the circuit court or judge, including the power to subpoena and examine witnesses of its own motion. The Governor, the officer affected or any party interested may subpoena witnesses and appear and participate in person or by counsel, and the officer shall be given reasonable opportunity to prepare and present this case. The Attorney General shall appear on behalf of the Governor if by the Governor requested so to do. [Formerly 148.120]
2023 Oregon Revised Statutes › Volume : 04 - Criminal Procedure, Crimes › Chapter 131 - Preliminary Provisions; Limitations; Jurisdiction; Venue; Criminal Forfeiture; Crime Prevention › Section 131.835 - Request that judge of another district conduct hearing; traveling expenses.

When the Governor has made a request for an investigation before the court or judge of the district of the office affected, the court or judge may request that the hearing be held before the court or judge of any other district and call in such court or judge to conduct the same at the regular place of holding court in the district of the office affected. Such a request shall be made by the court or judge without delay and the court or judge called in shall proceed without delay to conduct the hearing. The actual necessary traveling expenses of any court or judge that is called in shall be paid out of the funds appropriated for the purposes of ORS 131.815 to 131.875 upon properly verified vouchers being presented to the Secretary of State. [Formerly 148.130]
2023 Oregon Revised Statutes › Volume : 04 - Criminal Procedure, Crimes › Chapter 131 - Preliminary Provisions; Limitations; Jurisdiction; Venue; Criminal Forfeiture; Crime Prevention › Section 131.845 - Findings.

The court or judge shall make such findings as are justified by the facts adduced at the hearing and shall find as to whether or not the criminal laws of the state are being faithfully executed and enforced by the officers under investigation. [Formerly 148.140]
2023 Oregon Revised Statutes › Volume : 04 - Criminal Procedure, Crimes › Chapter 131 - Preliminary Provisions; Limitations; Jurisdiction; Venue; Criminal Forfeiture; Crime Prevention › Section 131.855 - Appointment of special officers on finding that laws are not enforced.

If it is found that the criminal laws of the state are not being faithfully executed and enforced by the officers under investigation, the Governor may appoint, for a period not longer than 90 days, such special officers as may be necessary to correct the failure to execute or enforce the criminal laws. [Formerly 148.150]
2023 Oregon Revised Statutes › Volume : 04 - Criminal Procedure, Crimes › Chapter 131 - Preliminary Provisions; Limitations; Jurisdiction; Venue; Criminal Forfeiture; Crime Prevention › Section 131.860 - Qualifying of special officers; powers and duties.

When appointed, special officers shall qualify in the same manner as provided by law for regularly elected officers, shall have all the power and authority of the regularly elected officers necessary to effectuate the purposes of the appointment and shall carry out the directions of the Governor, pursuant to the appointment, in the same manner and to the same extent as the duly elected officers could do or perform; and no greater power shall be conferred upon any special officer than is by law lodged with the regularly elected officers. [Formerly 148.160]
2023 Oregon Revised Statutes › Volume : 04 - Criminal Procedure, Crimes › Chapter 131 - Preliminary Provisions; Limitations; Jurisdiction; Venue; Criminal Forfeiture; Crime Prevention › Section 131.865 - Compensation of special officers.

The special officers provided for in ORS 131.855 shall receive a compensation for the time they are appointed equal to that provided for the regularly elected officers, the compensation to be paid in the same manner as the regular officers are paid. [Formerly 148.170]
2023 Oregon Revised Statutes › Volume : 04 - Criminal Procedure, Crimes › Chapter 131 - Preliminary Provisions; Limitations; Jurisdiction; Venue; Criminal Forfeiture; Crime Prevention › Section 131.875 - Effect of appointment of special officers on salary of regular officers.

The regularly elected, qualified and acting officers shall, during any appointment of a special officer, receive the salary provided by law, to the same extent as though no special officer had been appointed. [Formerly 148.180]
2023 Oregon Revised Statutes › Volume : 04 - Criminal Procedure, Crimes › Chapter 131 - Preliminary Provisions; Limitations; Jurisdiction; Venue; Criminal Forfeiture; Crime Prevention › Section 131.880 - Appointment of railroad police officers; liability.

The Governor, upon application of any railroad company operating in this state, may appoint and commission, during the pleasure of the Governor, persons designated by the company and to serve at the expense of the company, as police officers, with the powers of peace officers and who, after being duly sworn, may act as police officers to protect the railroad company property and the persons or property of the railroad company passengers or employees. The railroad company designating such persons is civilly responsible for any abuse of their authority. [1973 c.676 §1]
2023 Oregon Revised Statutes › Volume : 04 - Criminal Procedure, Crimes › Chapter 131 - Preliminary Provisions; Limitations; Jurisdiction; Venue; Criminal Forfeiture; Crime Prevention › Section 131.885 - Offer of reward.

If any person charged with or convicted of any felony within this state breaks prison, escapes, absconds or flees or hides from justice, the county court or county governing body of the county in which the crime was committed, if the court or governing body deems it necessary, may offer a reward for information leading to the apprehension of such person by the appropriate police authority. [Formerly 149.010; 1981 c.300 §1; 1999 c.217 §1]
2023 Oregon Revised Statutes › Volume : 04 - Criminal Procedure, Crimes › Chapter 131 - Preliminary Provisions; Limitations; Jurisdiction; Venue; Criminal Forfeiture; Crime Prevention › Section 131.890 - Entitlement to reward; use of public money to reward bounty hunter.

(1) Any person providing information leading to the apprehension of a person for whom a reward has been offered under ORS 131.885 is entitled to and shall be paid the reward offered under ORS 131.885 or a proportionate share thereof if more than one claimant is entitled.
(2) No public money may be used to pay a reward to a bounty hunter under this section. As used in this subsection, "bounty hunter" means a private person who is in the business of apprehending persons who have forfeited security or broken the terms of a security release, fled from justice or escaped from confinement. [Formerly 149.020; 1981 c.300 §2; 1999 c.217 §2]
2023 Oregon Revised Statutes › Volume : 04 - Criminal Procedure, Crimes › Chapter 131 - Preliminary Provisions; Limitations; Jurisdiction; Venue; Criminal Forfeiture; Crime Prevention › Section 131.892 - Offer of reward for information on commission of criminal offense.

An organization, association or person may offer a reward for information leading to the apprehension and conviction of any person who has committed a criminal offense. [1993 c.543 §2; 1995 c.461 §1; 1999 c.217 §3]
2023 Oregon Revised Statutes › Volume : 04 - Criminal Procedure, Crimes › Chapter 131 - Preliminary Provisions; Limitations; Jurisdiction; Venue; Criminal Forfeiture; Crime Prevention › Section 131.895 - Procedure for payment.

The county court or county governing body, on the claim of the applicant for reward under ORS 131.885 to 131.895, shall determine whether the claimant is entitled to the reward. If it so determines, it shall certify the amount offered in reward, or a proportionate share thereof if more than one claimant is entitled, to the county clerk of the county and the county clerk shall draw a warrant on the treasurer of the county for the amount so authorized. [Formerly 149.030; 1981 c.300 §3]
2023 Oregon Revised Statutes › Volume : 04 - Criminal Procedure, Crimes › Chapter 131 - Preliminary Provisions; Limitations; Jurisdiction; Venue; Criminal Forfeiture; Crime Prevention › Section 131.897 - Authority to order repayment of reward as part of sentence.

(1) In addition to any other sentence it may impose as a result of a criminal conviction, the court may order that a defendant reimburse to a person, organization, association or public body or officer, any sum or portion thereof offered and paid by the person, organization, association or public body or officer under ORS 131.885 to 131.895, as a reward for information leading to the apprehension of the defendant. Reimbursement under this section shall be ordered paid into the court, for further transfer by the clerk to the person, organization, association or public body or officer entitled to it.
(2) In determining whether to order reimbursement under this section, the court shall take into account:
(a) The financial resources of the defendant and the burden that reimbursement will impose, with due regard to the other obligations of the defendant; and
(b) The ability of the defendant to make reimbursement on an installment basis or on other conditions to be fixed by the court. [1981 c.300 §4; 1987 c.905 §13; 1993 c.543 §3; 1995 c.461 §2; 1999 c.217 §4; 2011 c.597 §121]
2023 Oregon Revised Statutes › Volume : 04 - Criminal Procedure, Crimes › Chapter 131 - Preliminary Provisions; Limitations; Jurisdiction; Venue; Criminal Forfeiture; Crime Prevention › Section 131.900 - Liability for medical expenses for person restrained, detained or taken into custody.

Except as otherwise provided by ORS 30.260 to 30.300, federal civil rights law or written agreement, the state, a county, a city, a law enforcement agency or local correctional facility thereof is not liable for charges or expenses for any medical services provided to an individual who is the object of efforts by a law enforcement officer to restrain or detain or take into custody. [1991 c.778 §8; 1993 c.196 §2]
2023 Oregon Revised Statutes › Volume : 04 - Criminal Procedure, Crimes › Chapter 131 - Preliminary Provisions; Limitations; Jurisdiction; Venue; Criminal Forfeiture; Crime Prevention › Section 131.905 - Legislative findings.

The Legislative Assembly finds and declares that:
(1) Surveys of the trust and confidence placed by Oregonians in state and local law enforcement indicate that there are Oregonians who believe that some law enforcement officers have engaged in practices that inequitably and unlawfully discriminate against individuals solely on the basis of their race, color or national origin.
(2) State and local law enforcement agencies can perform their missions more effectively when all Oregonians have trust and confidence that law enforcement stops and other contacts with individuals are free from inequitable and unlawful discrimination based on race, color or national origin.
(3) Representatives of community interest groups and state and local law enforcement agencies agree that collecting certain demographic data about contacts between individuals and state or local law enforcement officers will provide a statistical foundation to ensure that future contacts are free from inequitable and unlawful discrimination based on race, color or national origin.
(4) Demographic data collection can establish a factual and quantifiable foundation for measuring progress in eliminating discrimination based on race, color or national origin during law enforcement stops and other contacts with individuals, but data collection alone does not provide a sufficient basis for corrective action. Proper analysis of the demographic data and enactment of meaningful reforms in response to the results of that analysis require careful consideration of all relevant factors including the context of the community in which the data has been collected.
(5) It is the goal of this state that all law enforcement agencies perform their missions without inappropriate use of race, color or national origin as the basis for law enforcement actions. This goal may be achieved by providing assistance to state and local law enforcement agencies and the communities that they serve.
(6) This state shall foster, encourage and support the collection and analysis of demographic data by state and local law enforcement agencies. [2001 c.687 §5]
2023 Oregon Revised Statutes › Volume : 04 - Criminal Procedure, Crimes › Chapter 131 - Preliminary Provisions; Limitations; Jurisdiction; Venue; Criminal Forfeiture; Crime Prevention › Section 131.908 - Funding contributions.

Portland State University may accept contributions of funds from the United States, its agencies, or from any other source, public or private, and agree to conditions thereon not inconsistent with the purposes of the Law Enforcement Contacts Policy and Data Review Committee. [2001 c.687 §8; 2007 c.190 §3]
2023 Oregon Revised Statutes › Volume : 04 - Criminal Procedure, Crimes › Chapter 131 - Preliminary Provisions; Limitations; Jurisdiction; Venue; Criminal Forfeiture; Crime Prevention › Section 131.909 - Moneys received.

All moneys received by Portland State University under ORS 131.908 shall be paid into the State Treasury and deposited into the General Fund to the credit of Portland State University. Such moneys are appropriated continuously to Portland State University for the purposes of ORS 131.906. [2001 c.687 §9; 2007 c.190 §4]
2023 Oregon Revised Statutes › Volume : 04 - Criminal Procedure, Crimes › Chapter 131 - Preliminary Provisions; Limitations; Jurisdiction; Venue; Criminal Forfeiture; Crime Prevention › Section 131.915 - Definitions.

As used in ORS 131.915 to 131.925:
(1) "Gender identity" has the meaning given that term in ORS 174.100.
(2) "Law enforcement agency" means:
(a) The Department of State Police;
(b) The Department of Justice;
(c) A district attorney’s office; and
(d) Any of the following that maintains a law enforcement unit as defined in ORS 181A.355:
(A) A political subdivision or an instrumentality of the State of Oregon.
(B) A municipal corporation of the State of Oregon.
(C) A tribal government.
(D) A university.
(3) "Law enforcement officer" means:
(a) A member of the Oregon State Police;
(b) A sheriff, constable, marshal, municipal police officer or reserve officer or a police officer commissioned by a university under ORS 352.121 or 353.125;
(c) An investigator of a district attorney’s office if the investigator is or has been certified as a law enforcement officer in this or any other state;
(d) An investigator of the Criminal Justice Division of the Department of Justice;
(e) A humane special agent as defined in ORS 181A.345;
(f) A judicial marshal of the Marshal’s Office of the Judicial Department who is appointed under ORS 1.177 and trained pursuant to ORS 181A.540;
(g) A regulatory specialist exercising authority described in ORS 471.775 (2); or
(h) An authorized tribal police officer as defined in ORS 181A.940.
(4) "Profiling" means the targeting of an individual by a law enforcement agency or a law enforcement officer, on suspicion of the individual’s having violated a provision of law, based solely on the individual’s real or perceived age, race, ethnicity, color, national origin, language, sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, political affiliation, religion, homelessness or disability, unless the agency or officer is acting on a suspect description or information related to an identified or suspected violation of a provision of law.
(5) "Sexual orientation" has the meaning given that term in ORS 174.100. [2015 c.681 §1; 2017 c.17 §7; 2017 c.706 §6; 2021 c.173 §3; 2021 c.367 §8]
2023 Oregon Revised Statutes › Volume : 04 - Criminal Procedure, Crimes › Chapter 131 - Preliminary Provisions; Limitations; Jurisdiction; Venue; Criminal Forfeiture; Crime Prevention › Section 131.920 - Policies and procedures prohibiting profiling.

(1) All law enforcement agencies shall have written policies and procedures prohibiting profiling. The policies and procedures shall, at a minimum, include:
(a) A prohibition on profiling;
(b) Procedures allowing a complaint alleging profiling to be made to the agency:
(A) In person;
(B) In a writing signed by the complainant and delivered by hand, postal mail, facsimile or electronic mail; or
(C) By telephone, anonymously or through a third party;
(c) The provision of appropriate forms to use for submitting complaints alleging profiling;
(d) Procedures for submitting a copy of each profiling complaint to the Law Enforcement Contacts Policy and Data Review Committee and for receiving profiling complaints forwarded from the committee; and
(e) Procedures for investigating all complaints alleging profiling.
(2) A law enforcement agency shall:
(a) Investigate all complaints alleging profiling that are received by the agency or forwarded from the committee.
(b) Accept for investigation a complaint alleging profiling that is made to the agency within 180 days of the alleged profiling incident.
(c) Respond to every complaint alleging profiling within a reasonable time after the conclusion of the investigation. The response must contain a statement of the final disposition of the complaint. [2015 c.681 §2; 2015 c.681 §6; 2017 c.706 §7]
2023 Oregon Revised Statutes › Volume : 04 - Criminal Procedure, Crimes › Chapter 131 - Preliminary Provisions; Limitations; Jurisdiction; Venue; Criminal Forfeiture; Crime Prevention › Section 131.925 - Complaints alleging profiling; complaint form.

(1)(a) A law enforcement agency shall provide to the Law Enforcement Contacts Policy and Data Review Committee information concerning each complaint the agency receives alleging profiling, and shall notify the committee of the disposition of the complaint, in the manner described in this subsection.
(b) The law enforcement agency shall submit to the committee a profiling complaint report form summarizing each profiling complaint and the disposition of the complaint, and a copy of each profiling complaint, once each year no later than January 31.
(c) The law enforcement agency shall submit the form described in paragraph (b) of this subsection even if the agency has not received any profiling complaints.
(d) The profiling complaint report form and copies of profiling complaints submitted to the committee may not include personal information concerning the complainant or a law enforcement officer except as to any personal information recorded on the form as described in subsection (4)(c) of this section.
(2)(a) A person may submit to the committee a complaint alleging profiling and the committee shall receive the complaints.
(b) The committee also shall receive complaints alleging profiling that are forwarded from a law enforcement agency.
(c) The committee shall forward a copy of each profiling complaint the committee receives to the law enforcement agency employing the officer that is the subject of the complaint. The forwarded complaint must include the name of the complainant unless the complainant requests to remain anonymous, in which case the complainant’s name must be redacted.
(3)(a) The committee may not release any personal information concerning a complainant or a law enforcement officer who is the subject of a profiling complaint.
(b) The personal information of complainants and of law enforcement officers who are the subject of profiling complaints are exempt from public disclosure under ORS 192.355.
(4) The Department of State Police shall develop a standardized profiling complaint report form. The form must provide for recording the following information:
(a) A summary of total complaints and a certification that a law enforcement agency’s profiling policy conforms to ORS 131.920;
(b) A summary of each complaint received by the law enforcement agency, including the date, time and location of the incident and the disposition of the complaint; and
(c) To the extent known, the complainant’s gender, gender identity, age, race, ethnicity, sexual orientation, primary language, national origin, religion, political affiliation, homeless status and disability status, recorded in a manner that does not identify the complainant.
(5) As used in this section, "personal information" has the meaning given that term in ORS 807.750. [2015 c.681 §3; 2017 c.706 §5]
2023 Oregon Revised Statutes › Volume : 04 - Criminal Procedure, Crimes › Chapter 131 - Preliminary Provisions; Limitations; Jurisdiction; Venue; Criminal Forfeiture; Crime Prevention › Section 131.930 - Definitions.

As used in ORS 131.930 to 131.945:
(1) "Gender identity" has the meaning given that term in ORS 174.100.
(2) "Law enforcement agency" means an agency employing law enforcement officers to enforce criminal laws.
(3) "Law enforcement officer" means a member of the Oregon State Police, a sheriff or a municipal police officer.
(4) "Officer-initiated pedestrian stop" means a detention of a pedestrian by a law enforcement officer that is not associated with a call for service. The term does not apply to detentions for routine searches performed at the point of entry to or exit from a controlled area.
(5) "Officer-initiated traffic stop" means a detention of a driver of a motor vehicle by a law enforcement officer, not associated with a call for service, for the purpose of investigating a suspected violation of the Oregon Vehicle Code.
(6) "Profiling" means the targeting of an individual by a law enforcement agency or a law enforcement officer, on suspicion of the individual’s having violated a provision of law, based solely on the individual’s real or perceived age, race, ethnicity, color, national origin, language, sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, political affiliation, religion, homelessness or disability, unless the agency or officer is acting on a suspect description or information related to an identified or suspected violation of a provision of law.
(7) "Sexual orientation" has the meaning given that term in ORS 174.100. [2017 c.706 §1; 2019 c.305 §1; 2021 c.367 §9]
2023 Oregon Revised Statutes › Volume : 04 - Criminal Procedure, Crimes › Chapter 131 - Preliminary Provisions; Limitations; Jurisdiction; Venue; Criminal Forfeiture; Crime Prevention › Section 131.940 - Analysis of stop data to identify profiling; report.

(1) The Oregon Criminal Justice Commission shall review all data, including the prevalence and disposition of officer-initiated pedestrian and traffic stops, reported by law enforcement agencies pursuant to ORS 131.935 in order to identify patterns or practices of profiling.
(2) The commission shall select one or more statistical analysis methodologies, determined to be consistent with current best practices, with which to review the data as described in subsection (1) of this section.
(3) No later than December 1, 2019, and annually thereafter, the commission shall report the results of the review to the Governor, the Department of Public Safety Standards and Training and, in the manner provided in ORS 192.245, to the committees or interim committees of the Legislative Assembly related to the judiciary. [2017 c.706 §3]
2023 Oregon Revised Statutes › Volume : 04 - Criminal Procedure, Crimes › Chapter 131 - Preliminary Provisions; Limitations; Jurisdiction; Venue; Criminal Forfeiture; Crime Prevention › Section 131.945 - Training for law enforcement agencies; presentation to local public safety coordinating council.

(1) The Department of Public Safety Standards and Training shall receive and review reports provided to the department by the Oregon Criminal Justice Commission pursuant to ORS 131.940.
(2) Upon receipt of a report described in subsection (1) of this section, the department may provide advice or technical assistance to any law enforcement agency mentioned within the report. Any advice or technical assistance provided shall be based on best practices in policing as determined by the Oregon Center for Policing Excellence established in ORS 181A.660.
(3) Upon providing advice or technical assistance under this section, the department shall, within a reasonable amount of time, present a summary of the advice and assistance given to the local public safety coordinating council in the county in which the assisted law enforcement agency is located. If the assisted law enforcement agency is the Oregon State Police, the presentation shall occur in Marion County. The presentation shall be open to the public, feature live testimony by presenters and be held in accordance with ORS 192.610 to 192.705. [2017 c.706 §4]
2023 Oregon Revised Statutes › Volume : 04 - Criminal Procedure, Crimes › Chapter 131A - Civil Forfeiture › Section 131A.010 - Legislative findings; preemption of local laws; remedy not exclusive.

(1) The Legislative Assembly finds that:
(a) Prohibited conduct occurs in the course of criminal activities that result in, and are facilitated by, the acquisition, possession or transfer of property subject to civil forfeiture under this chapter.
(b) Transactions involving property subject to civil forfeiture under this chapter escape taxation.
(c) Governments attempting to respond to prohibited conduct require additional resources.
(d) Proceeds and instrumentalities of prohibited conduct should be forfeited, the rights and interests of affected persons protected, and the laws of this state relating to civil forfeiture of property based on prohibited conduct should be uniform throughout the state.
(2) The Legislative Assembly adopts the provisions of this chapter as the sole and exclusive law of the state governing civil forfeiture of real and personal property based on prohibited conduct. This chapter supersedes all charter provisions, ordinances, regulations and other enactments adopted by cities and counties relating to civil forfeitures. All forfeitures under the provisions of this chapter are subject to the limitations of section 10, Article XV of the Oregon Constitution.
(3) This chapter is applicable throughout this state. The electors or the governing body of a city or county may not enact, and the governing body of a city or county may not enforce, any charter provision, ordinance, resolution or other regulation that is inconsistent with this section.
(4) This chapter does not impair the right of any city or county to enact ordinances providing for the civil forfeiture of property if:
(a) The prohibited conduct constitutes the commission of a crime as described in ORS 161.515;
(b) The property constitutes proceeds or instrumentalities of the prohibited conduct; and
(c) The civil forfeiture is subject to the procedures and limitations set forth in this chapter.
(5) This chapter does not limit or impair any right or remedy that any person or entity may have under ORS 166.715 to 166.735. The application of any remedy under this chapter is remedial and not punitive and does not affect the application of any other civil or criminal remedy under any other provision of law. Civil remedies under this chapter are supplemental and are not mutually exclusive. [2009 c.78 §2]
2023 Oregon Revised Statutes › Volume : 04 - Criminal Procedure, Crimes › Chapter 131A - Civil Forfeiture › Section 131A.015 - Vesting of title to forfeited property.

Subject to this chapter, all right, title and interest in property forfeited under this chapter vests in the forfeiting agency upon the occurrence of the prohibited conduct on which the forfeiture is based. [2009 c.78 §3]
2023 Oregon Revised Statutes › Volume : 04 - Criminal Procedure, Crimes › Chapter 131A - Civil Forfeiture › Section 131A.020 - Property subject to forfeiture.

The following property is subject to forfeiture under this chapter:
(1) All controlled substances that have been manufactured, distributed, dispensed, possessed or acquired in the course of prohibited conduct.
(2) All raw materials, products and equipment of any kind that are used in providing, manufacturing, compounding, processing, delivering, importing or exporting any service or substance in the course of prohibited conduct.
(3) All property that is used as a container for property described in subsection (1) or (2) of this section.
(4) All conveyances, including aircraft, vehicles or vessels, that are used to transport or in any manner facilitate the transportation, sale, receipt, possession or concealment of property described in subsection (1) or (2) of this section, and all conveyances, including aircraft, vehicles or vessels, that are used in prohibited conduct or that are used to facilitate prohibited conduct in any manner.
(5) All books, records, computers and research, including formulae, microfilm, tapes and data that are used to facilitate prohibited conduct in any manner.
(6) All moneys, negotiable instruments, balances in deposit accounts or other accounts, securities or other things of value furnished by any person in the course of prohibited conduct, all proceeds of prohibited conduct, and all moneys, negotiable instruments, balances in deposit and other accounts and securities used to facilitate any prohibited conduct.
(7) All real property, including any right, title and interest in the whole of any lot or tract of land and any appurtenances or improvements, that is used in any manner, in whole or part, to commit or facilitate prohibited conduct.
(8) All weapons possessed, used or available for use in any manner to facilitate prohibited conduct.
(9) Any property described in this section that was intended for use in committing or facilitating an attempt to commit a crime as described in ORS 161.405, a solicitation as described in ORS 161.435 or a conspiracy as described in ORS 161.450. [2009 c.78 §4]
2023 Oregon Revised Statutes › Volume : 04 - Criminal Procedure, Crimes › Chapter 131A - Civil Forfeiture › Section 131A.025 - Consensual search of motor vehicle; required notice.

(1) Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter, property that is seized solely on the basis of a consensual search of a motor vehicle is not subject to forfeiture unless, before obtaining the consent of a person for the search, the person is provided with written, multilingual notice of the right of the person to refuse to consent to the search. The notice shall include at least the following information:
(a) Notice that the person has a right to refuse to consent to a search.
(b) Notice that a refusal to consent to a search cannot be used against the person for any purpose.
(c) Notice that anything found in the search can be seized as evidence of a crime or can be seized for forfeiture.
(2) A notice or consent form under this section shall be considered multilingual if the notice or form provides information in at least English and Spanish. [2009 c.78 §5]