2023 Oklahoma Statutes › Title 36. Insurance › §36-6475.3. Definitions.

For purposes of the Uniform Health Carrier External Review Act:
1. “Adverse determination” means a determination by a health carrier or its designee utilization review organization that an admission, availability of care, continued stay or other health care service that is a covered benefit has been reviewed and, based upon the information provided, does not meet the health carrier’s requirements for medical necessity, appropriateness, health care setting, level of care or effectiveness, and the requested service or payment for the service is therefore denied, reduced or terminated;
2. “Ambulatory review” means utilization review of health care services performed or provided in an outpatient setting;
3. “Authorized representative” means:
a.
a person to whom a covered person has given express written consent to represent the covered person in an external review,
b.
a person authorized by law to provide substituted consent for a covered person, or
c.
a family member of the covered person or the covered person’s treating health care professional only when the covered person is unable to provide consent;
4. “Best evidence” means evidence based on:
a.
randomized clinical trials,
b.
if randomized clinical trials are not available, cohort studies or case-control studies,
c.
if subparagraphs a and b of this paragraph are not available, case-series, or
d.
if subparagraphs a, b and c of this paragraph are not available, expert opinion;
5. “Case-control study” means a retrospective evaluation of two groups of patients with different outcomes to determine which specific interventions the patients received;
6. “Case management” means a coordinated set of activities conducted for individual patient management of serious, complicated, protracted or other health conditions;
7. “Case-series” means an evaluation of a series of patients with a particular outcome, without the use of a control group;
8. “Certification” means a determination by a health carrier or its designee utilization review organization that an admission, availability of care, continued stay or other health care service has been reviewed and, based on the information provided, satisfies the health carrier’s requirements for medical necessity, appropriateness, health care setting, level of care and effectiveness;
9. “Clinical review criteria” means the written screening procedures, decision abstracts, clinical protocols and practice guidelines used by a health carrier to determine the necessity and appropriateness of health care services;
10. “Cohort study” means a prospective evaluation of two groups of patients with only one group of patients receiving a specific intervention or specific interventions;
11. “Commissioner” means the Insurance Commissioner;
12. “Concurrent review” means utilization review conducted during a hospital stay or course of treatment of a patient;
13. “Covered benefits” or “benefits” means those health care services to which a covered person is entitled under the terms of a health benefit plan;
14. “Covered person” means a policyholder, subscriber, enrollee or other individual participating in a health benefit plan;
15. “Discharge planning” means the formal process for determining, prior to discharge from a facility, the coordination and management of the care that a patient receives following discharge from a facility;
16. “Disclose” means to release, transfer or otherwise divulge protected health information to any person other than the individual who is the subject of the protected health information;
17. “Emergency medical condition” means the sudden and, at the time, unexpected onset of a health condition or illness that requires immediate medical attention, where failure to provide medical attention would result in a serious impairment to bodily functions, serious dysfunction of a bodily organ or part, or would place the person’s health in serious jeopardy;
18. “Emergency services” means health care items and services furnished or required to evaluate and treat an emergency medical condition;
19. “Evidence-based standard” means the conscientious, explicit and judicious use of the current best evidence based on the overall systematic review of the research in making decisions about the care of individual patients;
20. “Expert opinion” means a belief or an interpretation by specialists with experience in a specific area about the scientific evidence pertaining to a particular service, intervention or therapy;
21. “Facility” means an institution providing health care services or a health care setting, including but not limited to hospitals and other licensed inpatient centers, ambulatory surgical or treatment centers, skilled nursing centers, residential treatment centers, diagnostic, laboratory and imaging centers, and rehabilitation and other therapeutic health settings;
22. “Final adverse determination” means an adverse determination involving a covered benefit that has been upheld by a health carrier, or its designee utilization review organization, at the completion of the health carrier’s internal grievance process procedures;
23. “Health benefit plan” means a policy, contract, certificate or agreement offered or issued by a health carrier to provide, deliver, arrange for, pay for or reimburse any of the costs of health care services;
24. “Health care professional” means a physician or other health care practitioner licensed, accredited or certified to perform specified health care services consistent with state law;
25. “Health care provider” or “provider” means a health care professional or a facility;
26. “Health care services” means services for the diagnosis, prevention, treatment, cure or relief of a health condition, illness, injury or disease;
27. “Health carrier” means an entity subject to the insurance laws and regulations of this state, or subject to the jurisdiction of the Commissioner, that contracts or offers to contract to provide, deliver, arrange for, pay for or reimburse any of the costs of health care services, including but not limited to a sickness and accident insurance company, a health maintenance organization, a nonprofit hospital and health service corporation, or any other entity providing a plan of health insurance, health benefits or health care services;
28. “Health information” means information or data, whether oral or recorded in any form or medium, and personal facts or information about events or relationships that relate to:
a.
the past, present or future physical, mental, or behavioral health or condition of an individual or a member of the individual’s family,
b.
the provision of health care services to an individual, or
c.
payment for the provision of health care services to an individual;
29. “Independent review organization” means an entity that conducts independent external reviews of adverse determinations and final adverse determinations;
30. “Medical or scientific evidence” means evidence found in the following sources:
a.
peer-reviewed scientific studies published in or accepted for publication by medical journals that meet nationally recognized requirements for scientific manuscripts and that submit most of the published articles for review by experts who are not part of the editorial staff,
b.
peer-reviewed medical literature, including literature relating to therapies reviewed and approved by a qualified institutional review board, biomedical compendia and other medical literature that meet the criteria of the National Institutes of Health’s Library of Medicine for indexing in Index Medicus (Medline) and Elsevier Science Ltd. for indexing in Excerpta Medicus (EMBASE),
c.
medical journals recognized by the Secretary of Health and Human Services under Section 1861(t)(2) of the federal Social Security Act,
d.
the following standard reference compendia:
(1)
the American Hospital Formulary Service–Drug Information,
(2)
Drug Facts and Comparisons,
(3)
the American Dental Association Accepted Dental Therapeutics, and
(4)
the United States Pharmacopoeia–Drug Information,
e.
findings, studies or research conducted by or under the auspices of federal government agencies and nationally recognized federal research institutes, including but not limited to:
(1)
the federal Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality,
(2)
the National Institutes of Health,
(3)
the National Cancer Institute,
(4)
the National Academy of Sciences,
(5)
the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services,
(6)
the federal Food and Drug Administration, and
(7)
any national board recognized by the National Institutes of Health for the purpose of evaluating the medical value of health care services, or
f.
any other medical or scientific evidence that is comparable to the sources listed in subparagraphs a through e of this paragraph;
31. “NAIC” means the National Association of Insurance Commissioners;
32. “Person” means an individual, a corporation, a partnership, an association, a joint venture, a joint stock company, a trust, an unincorporated organization, any similar entity or any combination of the foregoing;
33. “Prospective review” means utilization review conducted prior to an admission or a course of treatment;
34. “Protected health information” means health information:
a.
that identifies an individual who is the subject of the information, or
b.
with respect to which there is a reasonable basis to believe that the information could be used to identify an individual;
35. “Randomized clinical trial” means a controlled, prospective study of patients that have been randomized into an experimental group and a control group at the beginning of the study with only the experimental group of patients receiving a specific intervention, which includes study of the groups for variables and anticipated outcomes over time;
36. “Retrospective review” means a review of medical necessity conducted after services have been provided to a patient, but does not include the review of a claim that is limited to an evaluation of reimbursement levels, veracity of documentation, accuracy of coding or adjudication for payment;
37. “Second opinion” means an opportunity or requirement to obtain a clinical evaluation by a provider other than the one originally making a recommendation for a proposed health care service to assess the clinical necessity and appropriateness of the initial proposed health care service;
38. “Utilization review” means a set of formal techniques designed to monitor the use of, or evaluate the clinical necessity, appropriateness, efficacy, or efficiency of, health care services, procedures, or settings. Techniques may include but are not limited to ambulatory review, prospective review, second opinion, certification, concurrent review, case management, discharge planning, or retrospective review; and
39. “Utilization review organization” means an entity that conducts utilization review, other than a health carrier performing a review for its own health benefit plans.
Added by Laws 2011, c. 278, § 37 and Laws 2011, c. 360, § 27.
NOTE: Laws 2011, c. 278, § 37 and Laws 2011, c. 360, § 27 added identical sections under the same number.