2023 New Mexico Statutes › Chapter 55 - Uniform Commercial Code › Article 9 - Secured Transactions › Part 3 - PERFECTION AND PRIORITY › Subpart 3 - PRIORITY › Section 55-9-322 - Priorities among conflicting security interests in and agricultural liens on same collateral.

(a) Except as otherwise provided in this section, priority among conflicting security interests and agricultural liens in the same collateral is determined according to the following rules:
(1) Conflicting perfected security interests and agricultural liens rank according to priority in time of filing or perfection. Priority dates from the earlier of the time a filing covering the collateral is first made or the security interest or agricultural lien is first perfected, if there is no period thereafter when there is neither filing nor perfection.
(2) A perfected security interest or agricultural lien has priority over a conflicting unperfected security interest or agricultural lien.
(3) The first security interest or agricultural lien to attach or become effective has priority if conflicting security interests and agricultural liens are unperfected.
(b) For the purposes of Paragraph (1) of Subsection (a) of this section:
(1) the time of filing or perfection as to a security interest in collateral is also the time of filing or perfection as to a security interest in proceeds; and
(2) the time of filing or perfection as to a security interest in collateral supported by a supporting obligation is also the time of filing or perfection as to a security interest in the supporting obligation.
(c) Except as otherwise provided in Subsection (f) of this section, a security interest in collateral which qualifies for priority over a conflicting security interest under Section 55-9-327, 55-9-328, 55-9-329, 55-9-330 or 55-9-331 NMSA 1978 also has priority over a conflicting security interest in:
(1) any supporting obligation for the collateral; and
(2) proceeds of the collateral if:
(A) the security interest in proceeds is perfected;
(B) the proceeds are cash proceeds or of the same type as the collateral; and
(C) in the case of proceeds that are proceeds of proceeds, all intervening proceeds are cash proceeds, proceeds of the same type as the collateral or an account relating to the collateral.
(d) Subject to Subsection (e) of this section and except as otherwise provided in Subsection (f) of this section, if a security interest in chattel paper, deposit accounts, negotiable documents, instruments, investment property or letter-of-credit rights is perfected by a method other than filing, conflicting perfected security interests in proceeds of the collateral rank according to priority in time of filing.
(e) Subsection (d) of this section applies only if the proceeds of the collateral are not cash proceeds, chattel paper, negotiable documents, instruments, investment property or letter-of-credit rights.
(f) Subsections (a) through (e) of this section are subject to:
(1) Subsection (g) of this section and the other provisions of Sections 55-9-301 through 55-9-342 NMSA 1978;
(2) Section 55-4-210 NMSA 1978 with respect to a security interest of a collecting bank;
(3) Section 55-5-118 NMSA 1978 with respect to a security interest of an issuer or nominated person; and
(4) Section 55-9-110 NMSA 1978 with respect to a security interest arising under Chapter 55, Article 2 or 2A NMSA 1978.
(g) A perfected agricultural lien on collateral has priority over a conflicting security interest in or agricultural lien on the same collateral if the statute creating the agricultural lien so provides. If a statute other than Chapter 55, Article 9 NMSA 1978 creates an agricultural lien, and the other statute does not specify the priority of the agricultural lien relative to an agricultural lien or security interest in the same collateral created pursuant to Chapter 55, Article 9 NMSA 1978, then Subsection (a) (1) of this section shall govern the priority of the agricultural liens and security interests.
History:
1978 Comp., § 55-9-322, enacted by Laws 2001, ch. 139, § 42.
OFFICIAL COMMENTS
UCC Official Comments by ALI & the NCCUSL. Reproduced with permission of the PEB for the UCC. All rights reserved.
1.
Source
. Former section 9-312(5), (6).
2.
Scope of This Section.
In a variety of situations, two or more people may claim a security interest in the same collateral. This section states general rules of priority among conflicting security interests. As subsection (f) provides, the general rules in subsections (a) through (e) are subject to the rule in subsection (g) governing perfected agricultural liens and to the other rules in this part of this article. Rules that override this section include those applicable to purchase-money security interests (Section 9-324) and those qualifying for special priority in particular types of collateral.
See, e.g.
, Section 9-327 (deposit accounts); Section 9-328 (investment property); Section 9-329 (letter-of-credit rights); Section 9-330 (chattel paper and instruments); and Section 9-334 (fixtures). In addition, the general rules of Sections (a) through (e) are subject to priority rules governing security interests arising under Articles 2, 2A, 4, and 5.
3.
General Rules.
Subsection (a) contains three general rules. Subsection (a)(1) governs the priority of competing perfected security interests. Subsection (a)(2) governs the priority of competing security interests if one is perfected and the other is not. Subsection (a)(3) governs the priority of competing unperfected security interests. The rules may be regarded as adaptations of the idea, deeply rooted at common law, of a race of diligence among creditors. The first two rules are based on precedence in the time as of which the competing secured parties either filed their financing statements or obtained perfected security interests. Under Subsection (a)(1), the first secured party who files or perfects has priority. Under Subsection (a)(2), which is new, a perfected security interest has priority over an unperfected one. Under Subsection (a)(3), if both security interests are unperfected, the first to attach has priority. Note that Section 9-709(b) may affect the application of Subsection (a) to a filing that occurred before the effective date of this article (July 1, 2001) and which would be ineffective to perfect a security interest under former Article 9 but effective under this article.
4.
Competing Perfected Security Interests.
When there is more than one perfected security interest, the security interests rank according to priority in time of filing or perfection. "Filing," of course, refers to the filing of an effective financing statement. "Perfection" refers to the acquisition of a perfected security interest,
i.e.
, one that has attached and as to which any required perfection step has been taken.
See
Sections 9-308 and 9-309 [55-9-308, 55-9-309 NMSA 1978].
Example 1:
On February 1, A files a financing statement covering a certain item of Debtor's equipment. On March 1, B files a financing statement covering the same equipment. On April 1, B makes a loan to Debtor and obtains a security interest in the equipment. On May 1, A makes a loan to Debtor and obtains a security interest in the same collateral. A has priority even though B's loan was made earlier and was perfected when made. It makes no difference whether A knew of B's security interest when A made its advance.
The problem stated in Example 1 is peculiar to a notice-filing system under which filing may occur before the security interest attaches (
see
Section 9-502 [55-9-502 NMSA 1978]). The justification for determining priority by order of filing lies in the necessity of protecting the filing system that is, of allowing the first secured party who has filed to make subsequent advances without each time having to check for subsequent filings as a condition of protection. Note, however, that this first-to-file protection is not absolute. For example, Section 9-324 [55-9-324 NMSA 1978] affords priority to certain purchase-money security interests, even if a competing secured party was the first to file or perfect.
Under a notice-filing system, a filed financing statement indicates to third parties that a person may have a security interest in the collateral indicated. With further inquiry, they may discover the complete state of affairs. When a financing statement that is ineffective when filed becomes effective thereafter, the policy underlying the notice-filing system determines the "time of filing" for purposes of Subsection (a)(1). For example, the unauthorized filing of an otherwise sufficient initial financing statement becomes authorized, and the financing statement becomes effective, upon the debtor's post-filing authorization or ratification of the filing.
See
Section 9-509 [55-9-509 NMSA 1978], Comment 3. Because the notice value of the financing statement is independent of the timing of authorization or ratification, the time of the unauthorized filing is the "time of filing" for purposes of Subsection (a)(1). The same policy applies to the other priority rules in this part.
Example 2:
A and B make non-purchase-money advances secured by the same collateral. The collateral is in Debtor's possession, and neither security interest is perfected when the second advance is made. Whichever secured party first perfects its security interest (by taking possession of the collateral or by filing) takes priority. It makes no difference whether that secured party knows of the other security interest at the time it perfects its own.
The rule of Subsection (a)(1), affording priority to the first to file or perfect, applies to security interests that are perfected by any method, including temporarily (Section 9-312 [55-9-312 NMSA 1978]) or upon attachment (Section 9-309 [55-9-309 NMSA 1978]), even though there may be no notice to creditors or subsequent purchasers and notwithstanding any common-law rule to the contrary. The form of the claim to priority,
i.e.
, filing or perfection, may shift from time to time, and the rank will be based on the first filing or perfection as long as there is no intervening period without filing or perfection.
See
Section 9-308(c) [55-9-308(c) NMSA 1978].
Example 3:
On October 1, A acquires a temporarily perfected (20-day) security interest, unfiled, in a negotiable document in the debtor's possession under Section 9-312(e) [55-9-312(e) NMSA 1978]. On October 5, B files and thereby perfects a security interest that previously had attached to the same document. On October 10, A files. A has priority, even after the 20-day period expires, regardless of whether A knows of B's security interest when A files. A was the first to perfect and maintained continuous perfection or filing since the start of the 20-day period. However, the perfection of A's security interest extends only "to the extent it arises for new value given." To the extent A's security interest secures advances made by A beyond the 20-day period, its security interest would be subordinate to B's, inasmuch as B was the first to file.
In general, the rule in Subsection (a)(1) does not distinguish among various advances made by a secured party. The priority of every advance dates from the earlier of filing or perfection. However, in rare instances, the priority of an advance dates from the time the advance is made.
See
Example 3 and Section 9-323 [55-9-323 NMSA 1978].
5.
Priority in After-Acquired Property.
The application of the priority rules to after-acquired property must be considered separately for each item of collateral. Priority does not depend only on time of perfection but may also be based on priority in filing before perfection.
Example 4:
On February 1, A makes advances to Debtor under a security agreement covering "all Debtor's machinery, both existing and after-acquired." A promptly files a financing statement. On April 1, B takes a security interest in all Debtor's machinery, existing and after-acquired, to secure an outstanding loan. The following day, B files a financing statement. On May 1, Debtor acquires a new machine. When Debtor acquires rights in the new machine, both A and B acquire security interests in the machine simultaneously. Both security interests are perfected simultaneously. However, A has priority because A filed before B.
When after-acquired collateral is encumbered by more than one security interest, one of the security interests often is a purchase-money security interest that is entitled to special priority under Section 9-324.
6.
Priority in Proceeds: General Rule.
Subsection (b)(1) follows former Section 9-312(6). It provides that the baseline rules of Subsection (a) apply generally to priority conflicts in proceeds except where otherwise provided (
e.g.
, as in Subsections (c) through (e)). Under Section 9-203, attachment cannot occur (and therefore, under Section 9-308, perfection cannot occur) as to particular collateral until the collateral itself comes into existence and the debtor has rights in it. Thus, a security interest in proceeds of original collateral does not attach and is not perfected until the proceeds come into existence and the debtor acquires rights in them.
Example 5:
On April 1, Debtor signs a security agreement granting to A a security interest in all Debtor's existing and after-acquired inventory. The same day, A files a financing statement covering inventory. On May 1, Debtor signs a security agreement granting B a security interest in all Debtor's existing and future accounts. The same day, B files a financing statement covering accounts. On June 1, Debtor sells inventory to a customer on 30-day unsecured credit. When Debtor acquires the account, B's security interest attaches to it and is perfected by B's financing statement. At the very same time, A's security interest attaches to the account as proceeds of the inventory and is automatically perfected.
See
Section 9-315. Under Subsection (b) of this section, for purposes of determining A's priority in the account, the time of filing as to the original collateral (April 1, as to inventory) is also the time of filing as to proceeds (account). Accordingly, A's security interest in the account has priority over B's. Of course, had B filed its financing statement before A filed (e.g., on March 1), then B would have priority in the accounts.
Section 9-324 governs the extent to which a special purchase-money priority in goods or software carries over into the proceeds of the original collateral.
7.
Priority in Proceeds: Special Rules.
Subsections (c), (d), and (e), which are new, provide additional priority rules for proceeds of collateral in situations where the temporal (first-in-time) rules of Subsection (a)(1) are not appropriate. These new provisions distinguish what these comments refer to as "non-filing collateral" from what they call "filing collateral." As used in these comments, non-filing collateral is collateral of a type for which perfection may be achieved by a method other than filing (possession or control, mainly) and for which secured parties who so perfect generally do not expect or need to conduct a filing search. More specifically, non-filing collateral is chattel paper, deposit accounts, negotiable documents, instruments, investment property, and letter-of-credit rights. Other collateral - accounts, commercial tort claims, general intangibles, goods, nonnegotiable documents, and payment intangibles - is filing collateral.
8.
Proceeds of Non-Filing Collateral: Non-Temporal Priority.
Subsection (c)(2) provides a baseline priority rule for proceeds of non-filing collateral which applies if the secured party has taken the steps required for non-temporal priority over a conflicting security interest in non-filing collateral (e.g., control, in the case of deposit accounts, letter-of-credit rights, investment property, and in some cases, electronic negotiable documents, Section 9-331 [55-9-331 NMSA 1978]). This rule determines priority in proceeds of non-filing collateral whether or not there exists an actual conflicting security interest in the original non-filing collateral. Under Subsection (c)(2), the priority in the original collateral continues in proceeds if the security interest in proceeds is perfected and the proceeds are cash proceeds or non-filing proceeds "of the same type" as the original collateral. As used in Subsection (c)(2), "type" means a type of collateral defined in the Uniform Commercial Code and should be read broadly. For example, a security is "of the same type" as a security entitlement (
i.e.
, investment property), and a promissory note is "of the same type" as a draft (
i.e.
, an instrument).
Example 6:
SP-1 perfects its security interest in investment property by filing. SP-2 perfects subsequently by taking control of a certificated security. Debtor receives cash proceeds of the security (
e.g.
, dividends deposited into Debtor's deposit account). If the first-to-file-or-perfect rule of Subsection (a)(1) were applied, SP-1's security interest in the cash proceeds would be senior, although SP-2's security interest continues perfected under Section 9-315 beyond the 20-day period of automatic perfection. This was the result under former Article 9. Under Subsection (c), however, SP-2's security interest is senior.
Note that a different result would obtain in Example 6 (
i.e.
, SP-1's security interest would be senior) if SP-1 were to obtain control of the deposit-account proceeds. This is so because Subsection (c) is subject to subsection (f), which in turn provides that the priority rules under subsections (a) through (e) are subject to "the other provisions of this part." One of those "other provisions" is Section 9-327, which affords priority to a security interest perfected by control.
See
section 9-327(1).
Example 7:
SP-1 perfects its security interest in investment property by filing. SP-2 perfects subsequently by taking control of a certificated security. Debtor receives proceeds of the security consisting of a new certificated security issued as a stock dividend on the original collateral. Although the new security is of the same type as the original collateral (
i.e.
, investment property), once the 20-day period of automatic perfection expires (
see
Section 9-315(d)), SP-2's security interest is unperfected. (SP-2 has not filed or taken delivery or control, and no temporary-perfection rule applies.) Consequently, once the 20-day period expires, subsection (c) does not confer priority, and, under subsection (a)(2), SP-1's security interest in the security is senior. This was the result under former Article 9.
Example 8:
SP-1 perfects its security interest in investment property by filing. SP-2 perfects subsequently by taking control of a certificated security and also by filing against investment property. Debtor receives proceeds of the security consisting of a new certificated security issued as a stock dividend of the collateral. Because the new security is of the same type as the original collateral (
i.e.
, investment property) and (unlike example 7) SP-2's security interest is perfected by filing, SP-2's security interest is senior under Subsection (c). If the new security were redeemed by the issuer upon surrender and yet another security were received by Debtor, SP-2's security interest would continue to enjoy priority under Subsection (c). The new security would be proceeds of proceeds.
Example 9:
SP-1 perfects its security interest in investment property by filing. SP-2 subsequently perfects its security interest in investment property by taking control of a certificated security and also by filing against investment property. Debtor receives proceeds of the security consisting of a dividend check that it deposits to a deposit account. Because the check and the deposit account are cash proceeds, SP-1's and SP-2's security interests in the cash proceeds are perfected under section 9-315 beyond the 20-day period of automatic perfection. However, SP-2's security interest is senior under subsection (c).
Example 10:
SP-1 perfects its security interest in investment property by filing. SP-2 perfects subsequently by taking control of a certificated security and also by filing against investment property. Debtor receives an instrument as proceeds of the security. (Assume that the instrument is not cash proceeds.) Because the instrument is not of the same type as the original collateral (
i.e.
, investment property), SP-2's security interest, although perfected by filing, does not achieve priority under Subsection (c). Under the first-to-file-or-perfect rule of Subsection (a)(1), SP-1's security interest in the proceeds is senior.
The proceeds of proceeds are themselves proceeds.
See
Section 9-102 [55-9-102 NMSA 1978] (defining "proceeds" and "collateral"). Sometimes competing security interests arise in proceeds that are several generations removed from the original collateral. As the following example explains, the applicability of Subsection (c) may turn on the nature of the intervening proceeds.
Example 11:
SP-1 perfects its security interest in Debtor's deposit account by obtaining control. Thereafter, SP-2 files against inventory, (presumably) searches, finds no indication of a conflicting security interest, and advances against Debtor's existing and after-acquired inventory. Debtor uses funds from the deposit account to purchase inventory, which SP-1 can trace as identifiable proceeds of its security interest in Debtor's deposit account, and which SP-2 claims as original collateral. The inventory is sold and the proceeds deposited into another deposit account, as to which SP-1 has not obtained control. Subsection (c) does not govern priority in this other deposit account. This deposit account is cash proceeds and is also the same type of collateral as SP-1's original collateral, as required by Subsections (c)(2)(A) and (B). However, SP-1's security interest does not satisfy Subsection (c)(2)(C) because the inventory proceeds, which intervened between the original deposit account and the deposit account constituting the proceeds at issue, are not cash proceeds, proceeds of the same type as the collateral (original deposit account), or an account relating to the collateral. Stated otherwise, once proceeds other than cash proceeds, proceeds of the same type as the original collateral, or an account relating to the original collateral intervene in the chain of proceeds, priority under Subsection (c) is thereafter unavailable. The special priority rule in Subsection (d) also is inapplicable to this case.
See
Comment 9, Example 13, below. Instead, the general first-to-file-or-perfect rule of subsections (a) and (b) apply. Under that rule, SP-1 has priority unless its security interest in the inventory proceeds became unperfected under Section 9-315(d) [55-9-315(d) NMSA 1978]. Had SP-2 filed against inventory before SP-1 obtained control of the original deposit account, then SP-2 would have had priority even if SP-1's security interest in the inventory proceeds remained perfected.
If two security interests in the same original collateral are entitled to priority in an item of proceeds under Subsection (c)(2), the security interest having priority in the original collateral has priority in the proceeds.
9.
Proceeds of Nonfiling Collateral: Special Temporal Priority.
Under Subsections (d) and (e), if a security interest in nonfiling collateral is perfected by a method other than filing (
e.g.
, control or possession), it does not retain its priority over a conflicting security interest in proceeds that are filing collateral. Moreover, it is not entitled to priority in proceeds under the first-to-file-or-perfect rule of Subsections (a)(1) and (b). Instead, under Subsection (d), priority is determined by a new first-to-file rule.
Example 12:
SP-1 perfects its security interest in Debtor's deposit account by obtaining control. Thereafter, SP-2 files against equipment, (presumably) searches, finds no indication of a conflicting security interest, and advances against Debtor's equipment. SP-1 then files against Debtor's equipment. Debtor uses funds from the deposit account to purchase equipment, which SP-1 can trace as proceeds of its security interest in Debtor's deposit account. If the first-to-file-or-perfect rule were applied, SP-1's security interest would be senior under Subsections (a)(1) and (b), because it was the first to perfect in the original collateral and there was no period during which its security interest was unperfected. Under Subsection (d), however, SP-2's security interest would be senior because it filed first. This corresponds with the likely expectations of the parties.
Note that under Subsection (e), the first-to-file rule of Subsection (d) applies only if the proceeds in question are other than nonfiling collateral (
i.e.
, if the proceeds are filing collateral). If the proceeds are nonfiling collateral, either the first-to-file-or-perfect rule under Subsections (a) and (b) or the nontemporal priority rule in Subsection (c) would apply, depending on the facts.
Example 13:
SP-1 perfects its security interest in Debtor's deposit account by obtaining control. Thereafter, SP-2 files against inventory, (presumably) searches, finds no indication of a conflicting security interest, and advances against Debtor's existing and after-acquired inventory. Debtor uses funds from the deposit account to purchase inventory, which SP-1 can trace as identifiable proceeds of its security interest in Debtor's deposit account, and which SP-2 claims as original collateral. The inventory is sold and the proceeds deposited into another deposit account, as to which SP-1 has not obtained control. As discussed above in Comment 8, example 11, subsection (c) does not govern priority in this deposit account. Subsection (d) also does not govern, because the proceeds at issue (the deposit account) are cash proceeds.
See
Subsection (e). Rather, the general rules of Subsections (a) and (b) govern.
10.
Priority in Supporting Obligations.
Under subsections (b)(2) and (c)(1), a security interest having priority in collateral also has priority in a supporting obligation for that collateral. However, the rules in these subsections are subject to the special rule in Section 9-329 governing the priority of security interests in a letter-of-credit right.
See
Subsection (f). Under Section 9-329, a secured party's failure to obtain control (Section 9-107) of a letter-of-credit right that serves as supporting collateral leaves its security interest exposed to a priming interest of a party who does take control.
11.
Unperfected Security Interests.
Under Subsection (a)(3), if conflicting security interests are unperfected, the first to attach has priority. This rule may be of merely theoretical interest, inasmuch as it is hard to imagine a situation where the case would come into litigation without either secured party's having perfected its security interest. If neither security interest had been perfected at the time of the filing of a petition in bankruptcy, ordinarily neither would be good against the trustee in bankruptcy under the Bankruptcy Code.
12.
Agricultural Liens.
Statutes other than this article may purport to grant priority to an agricultural lien as against a conflicting security interest or agricultural lien. Under Subsection (g), if another statute grants priority to an agricultural lien, the agricultural lien has priority only if the same statute creates the agricultural lien and the agricultural lien is perfected. Otherwise, subsection (a) applies the same priority rules to an agricultural lien as to a security interest, regardless of whether the agricultural lien conflicts with another agricultural lien or with a security interest.
Inasmuch as no agricultural lien on proceeds arises under this article, Subsections (b) through (e) do not apply to proceeds of agricultural liens. However, if an agricultural lien has priority under Subsection (g) and the statute creating the agricultural lien gives the secured party a lien on proceeds of the collateral subject to the lien, a court should apply the principle of Subsection (g) and award priority in the proceeds to the holder of the perfected agricultural lien.
ANNOTATIONS
Effective dates.
— Laws 2001, ch. 139, § 155 makes the act effective July 1, 2001.
Cross references.
— For Farm Products Secured Interest Act, see Chapter 56, Article 13 NMSA 1978.
Decisions under former 55-9-312 NMSA 1978.
— In light of the similarity of this section and former Section 55-9-312 NMSA 1978, annotations decided under former 55-9-312 NMSA 1978 have been included in the annotations in this section.
Continuity of financing statement.
— The assignee of a security interest was entitled to the priority of the original financing statement since there was no lapse in sequence of filings of amendments, assignments, and continuations, and the assignee was lawfully entitled to all rights in the financing statement.
NationsCredit Com. Corp. v. Camp Town, Inc.
, 197 B.R. 139 (Bankr. D.N.M. 1996) (decided under former law).
Priority between landlord's lien and perfected security interest not covered.
— Since there is no statutory provision to cover the priority between a statutory landlord's lien and a perfected security interest, the court must rely on existing New Mexico case law to determine the priority between the interests.
National Inv. Trust v. First Nat'l Bank
, 1975-NMSC-065, 88 N.M. 514, 543 P.2d 482 (decided under former law).
A purchase money security interest that is perfected before any interest claimed by a landlord under a landlord's lien arises is superior to that landlord's lien.
Security Pac. Fin. Servs. v. Signfilled Corp.
, 1998-NMCA-046, 125 N.M. 38, 956 P.2d 837 (decided under former law).
Law reviews.
— For article, "The Warehouseman vs. the Secured Party: Who Prevails When the Warehouseman's Lien Covers Goods Subject to a Security Interest?" see 8 Nat. Resources J. 331 (1968).
For note, "Fixtures, Security Interests and Filing: Problems of Title Examination in New Mexico," see 8 Nat. Resources J. 513 (1968).
For article, "Buyers and Sellers of Goods in Bankruptcy," see 1 N.M. L. Rev. 435 (1971).
Am. Jur. 2d, A.L.R. and C.J.S. references. —
Rights and liabilities of junior chattel mortgagee with respect to mortgaged property, 43 A.L.R. 388.
Priority between attorney's lien for fees against a judgment and lien of creditor against same judgment, 34 A.L.R.4th 665.