2023 Missouri Revised Statutes › Title VI - County, Township and Political Subdivision Government › Chapter 67 - Political Subdivisions, Miscellaneous Powers › Section 67.1846 - Exceptions to applicability of right-of-way laws.

Title VI COUNTY, TOWNSHIP AND POLITICAL SUBDIVISION GOVERNMENT
Chapter 67
• Effective - 28 Aug 2020, 3 histories
67.1846. Exceptions to applicability of right-of-way laws. —
1. Nothing in sections 67.1830 to 67.1846 relieves the political subdivision of any obligations under an existing franchise agreement in effect on May 1, 2001. Nothing in sections 67.1830 to 67.1846 will apply to that portion of any ordinance passed prior to May 1, 2001, which establishes a street degradation fee. Nothing in sections 67.1830 to 67.1846 shall be construed as limiting the authority of county highway engineers or relieving public utility right-of-way users from any obligations set forth in chapters 229 to 231. Nothing in sections 67.1830 to 67.1846 shall be deemed to relieve a public utility right-of-way user of the provisions of an existing franchise, franchise fees, license or other agreement or permit in effect on May 1, 2001. Nothing in sections 67.1830 to 67.1846 shall prohibit a political subdivision or public utility right-of-way user from renewing or entering into a new or existing franchise, as long as all other public utility right-of-way users have use of the public right-of-way on a nondiscriminatory basis. Nothing in sections 67.1830 to 67.1846 shall prevent a grandfathered political subdivision from enacting new ordinances, including amendments of existing ordinances, charging a public utility right-of-way user a fair and reasonable linear foot fee or antenna fee or from enforcing or renewing existing linear foot ordinances for use of the right-of-way, provided that the public utility right-of-way user either:
(1) Is entitled under the ordinance to a credit for any amounts paid as business license taxes or gross receipts taxes; or
(2) Is not required by the political subdivision to pay the linear foot fee or antenna fee if the public utility right-of-way user is paying gross receipts taxes, business license fees, or business license taxes that are not nominal and that are imposed specifically on communications-related revenue, services, or equipment.
­­For purposes of this section, a
"grandfathered political subdivision"
is any political subdivision which has, prior to May 1, 2001, enacted one or more ordinances reflecting a policy of imposing any linear foot fees on any public utility right-of-way user, including ordinances which were specific to particular public right-of-way users. Any existing ordinance or new ordinance passed by a grandfathered political subdivision providing for payment of the greater of a linear foot fee or a gross receipts tax shall be enforceable only with respect to the linear foot fee.
2. A grandfathered political subdivision shall not charge a linear foot fee for use of its right-of-way to a small local exchange telecommunications company as of December 31, 2019, as defined in section 386.020; provided that the small local exchange telecommunications company is providing internet access to customers within the rural areas of the state.
3. Nothing in sections 67.1830 to 67.1846 shall prohibit a political subdivision from enacting, renewing or enforcing provisions of an ordinance to require a business license tax, sales tax, occupation tax, franchise tax or franchise fee, property tax or other similar tax, to the extent consistent with federal law. Nothing in sections 67.1830 to 67.1846 shall prohibit a political subdivision from enacting, enforcing or renewing provisions of an ordinance to require a gross receipts tax pursuant to chapter 66, chapter 92, or chapter 94. For purposes of this subsection, the term
"franchise fee"
shall mean "franchise tax".
­­--------
(L. 2001 S.B. 369, A.L. 2018 H.B. 1991, A.L. 2020 H.B. 1768)
(2019) Grandfather provision of section allowing political subdivisions to recover certain payments from public utility right-of-way users if the subdivision had imposed fees on such users prior to May 1, 2001, has a rational basis and thus is not a special law violative of the Missouri Constitution. City of Aurora v. Spectra Communications Group, LLC, 592 S.W.3d 764 (Mo.banc).