2023 Louisiana Laws › Revised Statutes › Title 49 - State Administration › §49:193. Re-creation of terminated entity; procedure

RS 49:193 - Re-creation of terminated entity; procedure
The procedure for re-creation of any statutory entity to be terminated under the provisions of this Part shall be as follows:
A.(1) By September first of the calendar year three years prior to the calendar year of the applicable termination date, the president of the Senate and the speaker of the House of Representatives shall assign the applicable statutory entities to standing committees of their respective houses which shall initially perform the evaluation to determine if a statutory entity shall be continued, modified, or terminated. The statutory entities shall be assigned, if practicable, to the standing committees of the two houses which have usual jurisdiction over the affairs of the statutory entities.
(2) The standing committees of the two houses performing the evaluation of the same statutory entities may meet jointly to discharge some or all of their duties.
B. No later than thirty days after the referral of the statutory entities to the appropriate standing committees, the committees shall, separately or jointly, notify the statutory entities under their jurisdiction of the termination dates and provide them a tentative schedule for evaluation hearings. In addition, the committees shall, separately or jointly, request the Department of State Civil Service to review the job descriptions and staffing of each entity. After receipt of the notice of termination and evaluation from the appropriate standing committees, each statutory entity shall provide the standing committees with the following information at the same time it submits its budget request to the governor under the provisions of R.S. 39:33:
(1) The identity of all sub-units under the direct or advisory control of the statutory entity under evaluation.
(2) All powers, functions, and duties currently performed by the statutory entity under evaluation.
(3) All constitutional, statutory, or other authority under which the powers, functions, and duties of the statutory entity under evaluation are performed and carried out.
(4) Any powers, functions, or duties which, in the opinion of the statutory entity under evaluation, are being performed and duplicated by another statutory entity or political subdivision within the state including the manner in which, and the extent to which, this duplication of efforts is occurring and any recommendations as to eliminating the duplication.
(5) Any powers, functions, or duties which, in the opinion of the statutory entity under evaluation, are inconsistent with current and projected public needs and which should be terminated or altered.
(6) The identity of any problems or any programs of the entity to which, in the opinion of the entity, the committees should give particular study.
(7) All strategic plans, master plans, operating plans, and other planning documents including performance measures.
(8) All performance audits or studies performed by the legislative auditor within the last five years and a description of agency actions in response to the findings of such audits or studies.
(9) The identity, amount, and description of each professional, personal, or consulting service contract entered into by the statutory entity under evaluation.
(10) The identity of each report the statutory entity is required by law to produce, including the citation of the law requiring the report, an estimate of the agency resources expended to produce the report, and the opinion of the agency regarding the continued necessity of the report.
(11) Any other information which a standing committee in its discretion feels is necessary and proper in performing its review and evaluation duties.
C. Repealed by Acts 1995, No. 712, §2.
D. The evaluations by the standing committees shall be made, using the factors set out in Subsection E of this Section, for the purpose of achieving the following:
(1) The elimination of inactive entities.
(2) The elimination or consolidation of entities, programs, or activities which duplicate other governmental entities, programs, or activities.
(3) The elimination of unnecessary entities, programs, or activities or entities, programs, or activities which no longer serve the public interest.
(4) The elimination or improvement of inefficient or ineffective entities, programs, or activities.
(5) The elimination or revision of entities, programs, or activities that are inconsistent with the intent of legislation authorizing the entity, program, or activity.
E. Prior to the final adjournment of the regular legislative session convening in the odd-numbered year two years prior to the year in which the applicable termination date occurs, the appropriate standing committees, to which the statutory entities have been referred, shall conduct such study and evaluation as shall be necessary to determine whether or not proposed legislation shall be introduced to continue or modify the appropriate statutory entity. The standing committees shall hold public hearings to receive testimony from the appropriate statutory entities and from the public as a part of that study and evaluation. The standing committees shall hold the public hearings in accordance with R.S. 42:11 through R.S. 42:25 and any applicable legislative rules. At the hearings, the statutory entity shall have the burden of demonstrating a public need for its continued existence. It shall have the further burden of demonstrating that its objectives, programs, and activities are consistent with legislative intent and effectively and efficiently achieve this intent. A standing committee, in making a determination as to whether a statutory entity has demonstrated a public need for the continued existence of the statutory entity, its programs, or activities, shall take into consideration, among others, the following factors:
(1) The extent to which any information required to be furnished to the standing committee has been omitted, misstated, or refused, and the extent to which conclusions reasonably drawn from said information are adverse to the legislative intent inherent in the powers, functions, and duties as established in the enabling legislation creating the statutory entity, or are inconsistent with present or projected public demands or needs.
(2) Based on strategic plans, master plans, and operating plans together with relevant performance measures and any other factors or information an examination of the extent to which the objectives of the statutory entity under evaluation conform to the statutory objectives for the statutory entity.
(3) The extent to which the objectives of the statutory entity under evaluation have been effectively and efficiently achieved as reflected by relevant performance measures, and an analysis of any significant variance between projected and actual performance.
(4) The extent to which the statutory entity has operated in the public interest and the extent to which its operation has been impeded or enhanced by existing statutes, procedures, and practices and any other circumstances, including budgetary, resource, and personnel matters.
(5) The extent to which the statutory entity has recommended statutory changes to the legislature which would benefit the public as opposed to the statutory entity itself.
(6) An identification of other statutory entities, or other programs or activities of state or local government having the same or similar objectives, together with a comparison of the cost-effectiveness of such statutory entities, programs, or activities and any duplication of the statutory entity under review.
(7) The extent to which the statutory entity has encouraged participation by the public in making its rules and decisions as opposed to participation solely by its constituency.
(8) The efficiency with which formal public complaints filed with the statutory entity concerning matters subject to its jurisdiction have been processed by the statutory entity.
(9) The extent to which changes are necessary in the enabling laws of the statutory entity to adequately comply with the factors listed in this Section.
(10) The extent to which the statutory entity's operation has been efficient and responsive to the public needs.
(11) The extent to which the statutory entity has encouraged that units regulated or served report to the statutory entity concerning the impact of rules and decisions regarding improved service, economy of service, or availability of service to the public.
(12) The extent to which the statutory entity has permitted qualified applicants to serve the public.
(13) The extent to which requirements of state and federal statutes and constitutions have been complied with by the statutory entity or the units it regulates or the constituency it serves.
(14) The findings, recommendations, and entity responses to any performance audits or studies conducted by the legislative auditor.
(15) The findings and recommendations of the Department of State Civil Service with respect to job descriptions and staffing of the statutory entity.
(16) The extent of privatization of the programs, functions, or activities of the statutory entity through the use of professional, personal, or consulting services.
(17) Any other relevant criteria which a standing committee, in its discretion, deems necessary and proper in reviewing and evaluating the sufficient public need for continuance of the respective statutory entity.
F.(1) The standing committees shall submit their final evaluation report to the legislature and the governor by March first before the regular legislative session in the year prior to the applicable termination date.
(2) The report of the standing committee shall include a summary of its findings concerning the factors listed in Subsection E of this Section.
(3) The standing committee making the report shall recommend termination, continuation, or modification of the appropriate statutory entity, including any proposals for reorganization, consolidation, or transfer of duties of the statutory entity, program, or activity. If the standing committee finds that a statutory entity or any of its programs or activities should terminate as scheduled, then the committee's report shall include proposed legislation, if any is necessary, to conform related laws to the termination of that statutory entity, its programs, or activities. If the standing committee finds that a statutory entity shall be continued or modified, then the committee's report shall include proposed legislation necessary to accomplish continuation or modification. If the committee finds that changes in particular programs or activities of the entity are needed, the report shall include proposed legislation necessary to accomplish such changes.
(4) The committee report shall also include an evaluation of whether the objectives of the entity for the next six years and measures for performance for these objectives are consistent with statutory authority or requirements of the entity.
(5) No recommendation of any joint reviewing committee shall be submitted in the report unless the recommendation is approved by the majority of the members of each house serving on the committee.
G. In the regular legislative session in the year prior to the year in which the applicable termination date occurs, a bill authorizing the re-creation of the statutory entity in question may be introduced and shall be referred to the standing committee that performed the initial review and evaluation. Such bill shall contain a termination date for the statutory entity being re-created no more than six years from its effective termination date. No more than one statutory entity shall be re-created in any bill, but this limitation shall not be construed to prohibit consolidation of two or more statutory entities or parts of statutory entities in any one bill.
H. Unless the legislature enacts the bill to continue or modify the entity, the entity shall begin to phase out its operations on the date set forth in R.S. 49:191 and the legislative authority for such statutory entity shall cease on the following July first.
I. If the bill authorizing re-creation of an entity does not become law, the statutes creating and continuing such entity shall be construed as repealed on the applicable termination date fixed in R.S. 49:190 and R.S. 49:191.
J. No funds shall be appropriated or otherwise be made available from any source whatsoever to any entity after the applicable termination date of such statutory entity unless it has been re-created in accordance with the procedure set forth in this Part.
K. If the bill authorizing re-creation of an entity becomes law, the committee may request, and the entity shall provide, a copy of the agency budget request and operating plan for the entity prepared and submitted to the governor for the ensuing year as provided in R.S. 39:33. Such budget request shall be submitted to the committee at the time it is submitted to the governor. The committee shall review the budget request and operating plan submitted by the entity and shall report any recommendations thereon to the Joint Legislative Committee on the Budget or its successor, prior to its deliberations on the proposed budget for the entity.
L. Standing committees making the reviews and evaluation may request the assistance of the Legislative Fiscal Office and the legislative auditor to compile pertinent information about the statutory entity under review for use during the evaluation.
M. Repealed by Acts 1995, No. 712, §2.
Added by Acts 1976, No. 277, §4. Amended by Acts 1978, No. 674, §1; Acts 1979, No. 512, §1; Acts 1984, No. 76, §3, eff. June 15, 1984; Acts 1986, No. 493, §3, eff. July 1, 1986; Acts 1986, No. 14, §4, eff. July 1, 1986; Acts 1986, No. 447, §6, eff. July 1, 1986; Acts 1986, No. 460, §1; Acts 1986, No. 282, §3, eff. June 30, 1986; Acts 1988, No. 58, §4; Acts 1989, No. 836, §3, eff. July 1, 1989; Acts 1995, No. 712, §§1, 2; Acts 1997, No. 997, §1; Acts 2004, No. 477, §1, eff. June 30, 2004; Acts 2022, No. 364, §1.
NOTE: See Acts 2004, No. 477, §2, relative to Act superseding conflicting provisions of R.S. 49:192 and 193.