reglab/statecodes huggingface dataset:
2023 Indiana Code › Title 26. Commercial Law › Article 1. Uniform Commercial Code › Chapter 4.1. Fund Transfers › 26-1-4.1-305. Liability for Late or Improper Execution or Failure to Execute Payment Order

Sec. 305. (a) If a funds transfer is completed but execution of a payment order by the receiving bank in breach of IC 26-1-4.1-302 results in delay in payment to the beneficiary, the bank is obliged to pay interest to either the originator or the beneficiary of the funds transfer for the period of delay caused by the improper execution. Except as provided in subsection (c), additional damages are not recoverable.
(b) If execution of a payment order by a receiving bank in breach of IC 26-1-4.1-302 results in (i) noncompletion of the funds transfer, (ii) failure to use an intermediary bank designated by the originator, or (iii) issuance of a payment order that does not comply with the terms of the payment order of the originator, the bank is liable to the originator for its expenses in the funds transfer and for incidental expenses and interest losses, to the extent not covered by subsection (a), resulting from the improper execution. Except as provided in subsection (c), additional damages are not recoverable.
(c) In addition to the amounts payable under subsections (a) and (b), damages, including consequential damages, are recoverable to the extent provided in an express agreement of the receiving bank, evidenced by a record.
(d) If a receiving bank fails to execute a payment order it was obliged by express agreement to execute, the receiving bank is liable to the sender for its expenses in the transaction and for incidental expenses and interest losses resulting from the failure to execute. Additional damages, including consequential damages, are recoverable to the extent provided in an express agreement of the receiving bank, evidenced by a record, but are not otherwise recoverable.
(e) Reasonable attorney's fees are recoverable if demand for compensation under subsection (a) or (b) is made and refused before an action is brought on the claim. If a claim is made for breach of an agreement under subsection (d) and the agreement does not provide for damages, reasonable attorney's fees are recoverable if demand for compensation under subsection (d) is made and refused before an action is brought on the claim.
(f) Except as stated in this section, the liability of a receiving bank under subsections (a) and (b) may not be varied by agreement.
As added by P.L.189-1991, SEC.4. Amended by P.L.199-2023, SEC.30.
2023 Indiana Code › Title 26. Commercial Law › Article 1. Uniform Commercial Code › Chapter 4.1. Fund Transfers › 26-1-4.1-401. "Payment Date"

Sec. 401. "Payment date" of a payment order means the day on which the amount of the order is payable to the beneficiary by the beneficiary's bank. The payment date may be determined by instruction of the sender but cannot be earlier than the day the order is received by the beneficiary's bank and, unless otherwise determined, is the day the order is received by the beneficiary's bank.
As added by P.L.189-1991, SEC.4.
2023 Indiana Code › Title 26. Commercial Law › Article 1. Uniform Commercial Code › Chapter 4.1. Fund Transfers › 26-1-4.1-402. Obligation of Sender to Pay Receiving Bank

Sec. 402. (a) This section is subject to IC 26-1-4.1-205 and IC 26-1-4.1-207.
(b) With respect to a payment order issued to the beneficiary's bank, acceptance of the order by the bank obliges the sender to pay the bank the amount of the order, but payment is not due until the payment date of the order.
(c) This subsection is subject to subsection (e) and to IC 26-1-4.1-303. With respect to a payment order issued to a receiving bank other than the beneficiary's bank, acceptance of the order by the receiving bank obliges the sender to pay the bank the amount of the sender's order. Payment by the sender is not due until the execution date of the sender's order. The obligation of that sender to pay its payment order is excused if the funds transfer is not completed by acceptance by the beneficiary's bank of a payment order instructing payment to the beneficiary of that sender's payment order.
(d) If the sender of a payment order pays the order and was not obliged to pay all or part of the amount paid, the bank receiving payment is obliged to refund payment to the extent the sender was not obliged to pay. Except as provided in IC 26-1-4.1-204 and IC 26-1-4.1-304, interest is payable on the refundable amount from the date of payment.
(e) If a funds transfer is not completed as stated in subsection (c) and an intermediary bank is obliged to refund payment as stated in subsection (d) but is unable to do so because not permitted by applicable law or because the bank suspends payments, a sender in the funds transfer that executed a payment order in compliance with an instruction, as stated in IC 26-1-4.1-302(a)(1), to route the funds transfer through that intermediary bank is entitled to receive or retain payment from the sender of the payment order that it accepted. The first sender in the funds transfer that issued an instruction requiring routing through that intermediary bank is subrogated to the right of the bank that paid the intermediary bank to refund as stated in subsection (d).
(f) The right of the sender of a payment order to be excused from the obligation to pay the order as stated in subsection (c) or to receive refund under subsection (d) may not be varied by agreement.
As added by P.L.189-1991, SEC.4.
2023 Indiana Code › Title 26. Commercial Law › Article 1. Uniform Commercial Code › Chapter 4.1. Fund Transfers › 26-1-4.1-403. Payment by Sender to Receiving Bank

Sec. 403. (a) Payment of the sender's obligation under IC 26-1-4.1-402 to pay the receiving bank occurs as follows:
(1) If the sender is a bank, payment occurs when the receiving bank receives final settlement of the obligation through a Federal Reserve Bank or through a funds-transfer system.
(2) If the sender is a bank and the sender:
(i) credited an account of the receiving bank with the sender; or
(ii) caused an account of the receiving bank in another bank to be credited;
payment occurs when the credit is withdrawn or, if not withdrawn, at midnight of the day on which the credit is withdrawable and the receiving bank learns of that fact.
(3) If the receiving bank debits an account of the sender with the receiving bank, payment occurs when the debit is made to the extent the debit is covered by a withdrawable credit balance in the account.
(b) If the sender and receiving bank are members of a funds-transfer system that nets obligations multilaterally among participants, the receiving bank receives final settlement when settlement is complete in accordance with the rules of the system. The obligation of the sender to pay the amount of a payment order transmitted through the funds-transfer system may be satisfied, to the extent permitted by the rules of the system, by setting off and applying against the sender's obligation the right of the sender to receive payment from the receiving bank of the amount of any other payment order transmitted to the sender by the receiving bank through the funds-transfer system. The aggregate balance of obligations owed by each sender to each receiving bank in the funds-transfer system may be satisfied, to the extent permitted by the rules of the system, by setting off and applying against that balance the aggregate balance of obligations owed to the sender by other members of the system. The aggregate balance is determined after the right of setoff stated in the second sentence of this subsection has been exercised.
(c) If two banks transmit payment orders to each other under an agreement that settlement of the obligations of each bank to the other under IC 26-1-4.1-402 will be made at the end of the day or other period, the total amount owed with respect to all orders transmitted by one bank shall be set off against the total amount owed with respect to all orders transmitted by the other bank. To the extent of the setoff, each bank has made payment to the other.
(d) In a case not covered by subsection (a), the time when payment of the sender's obligation under IC 26-1-4.1-402(b) or IC 26-1-4.1-402(c) occurs is governed by applicable principles of law that determine when an obligation is satisfied.
As added by P.L.189-1991, SEC.4.
2023 Indiana Code › Title 26. Commercial Law › Article 1. Uniform Commercial Code › Chapter 4.1. Fund Transfers › 26-1-4.1-404. Obligation of Beneficiary's Bank to Pay and Give Notice to Beneficiary

Sec. 404. (a) Subject to IC 26-1-4.1-211(e), IC 26-1-4.1-405(d), and IC 26-1-4.1-405(e), if a beneficiary's bank accepts a payment order, the bank is obliged to pay the amount of the order to the beneficiary of the order. Payment is due on the payment date of the order, but if acceptance occurs on the payment date after the close of the funds-transfer business day of the bank, payment is due on the next funds-transfer business day. If the bank refuses to pay after demand by the beneficiary and receipt of notice of particular circumstances that will give rise to consequential damages as a result of nonpayment, the beneficiary may recover damages resulting from the refusal to pay to the extent the bank had notice of the damages, unless the bank proves that it did not pay because of a reasonable doubt concerning the right of the beneficiary to payment.
(b) If a payment order accepted by the beneficiary's bank instructs payment to an account of the beneficiary, the bank is obliged to notify the beneficiary of receipt of the order before midnight of the next funds-transfer business day following the payment date. If the payment order does not instruct payment to an account of the beneficiary, the bank is required to notify the beneficiary only if notice is required by the order. Notice may be given by first class mail or any other means reasonable in the circumstances. If the bank fails to give the required notice, the bank is obliged to pay interest to the beneficiary on the amount of the payment order from the day notice should have been given until the day the beneficiary learned of receipt of the payment order by the bank. No other damages are recoverable. Reasonable attorney's fees are also recoverable if demand for interest is made and refused before an action is brought on the claim.
(c) The right of a beneficiary to receive payment and damages as stated in subsection (a) may not be varied by agreement or a funds-transfer system rule. The right of a beneficiary to be notified as stated in subsection (b) may be varied by agreement of the beneficiary or by a funds-transfer system rule if the beneficiary is notified of the rule before initiation of the funds transfer.
As added by P.L.189-1991, SEC.4.
2023 Indiana Code › Title 26. Commercial Law › Article 1. Uniform Commercial Code › Chapter 4.1. Fund Transfers › 26-1-4.1-406. Payment by Originator to Beneficiary; Discharge of Underlying Obligation

Sec. 406. (a) Subject to IC 26-1-4.1-211(e), IC 26-1-4.1-405(d), and IC 26-1-4.1-405(e), the originator of a funds transfer pays the beneficiary of the originator's payment order (i) at the time a payment order for the benefit of the beneficiary is accepted by the beneficiary's bank in the funds transfer and (ii) in an amount equal to the amount of the order accepted by the beneficiary's bank, but not more than the amount of the originator's order.
(b) If payment under subsection (a) is made to satisfy an obligation, the obligation is discharged to the same extent discharge would result from payment to the beneficiary of the same amount in money, unless (i) the payment under subsection (a) was made by a means prohibited by the contract of the beneficiary with respect to the obligation, (ii) the beneficiary, within a reasonable time after receiving notice of receipt of the order by the beneficiary's bank, notified the originator of the beneficiary's refusal of the payment, (iii) funds with respect to the order were not withdrawn by the beneficiary or applied to a debt of the beneficiary, and (iv) the beneficiary would suffer a loss that could reasonably have been avoided if payment had been made by a means complying with the contract. If payment by the originator does not result in discharge under this section, the originator is subrogated to the rights of the beneficiary to receive payment from the beneficiary's bank under IC 26-1-4.1-404(a).
(c) For the purpose of determining whether discharge of an obligation occurs under subsection (b), if the beneficiary's bank accepts a payment order in an amount equal to the amount of the originator's payment order less charges of one or more receiving banks in the funds transfer, payment to the beneficiary is deemed to be in the amount of the originator's order unless upon demand by the beneficiary the originator does not pay the beneficiary the amount of the deducted charges.
(d) Rights of the originator or of the beneficiary of a funds transfer under this section may be varied only by agreement of the originator and the beneficiary.
As added by P.L.189-1991, SEC.4.
2023 Indiana Code › Title 26. Commercial Law › Article 1. Uniform Commercial Code › Chapter 4.1. Fund Transfers › 26-1-4.1-501. Variation by Agreement and Effect of Funds Transfer System Rule

Sec. 501. (a) Except as otherwise provided in IC 26-1-4.1, the rights and obligations of a party to a funds transfer may be varied by agreement of the affected party.
(b) "Funds-transfer system rule" means a rule of an association of banks (i) governing transmission of payment orders by means of a funds-transfer system of the association or rights and obligations with respect to those orders, or (ii) to the extent the rule governs rights and obligations between banks that are parties to a funds transfer in which a Federal Reserve Bank, acting as an intermediary bank, sends a payment order to the beneficiary's bank. Except as otherwise provided in IC 26-1-4.1, a funds-transfer system rule governing rights and obligations between participating banks using the system may be effective even if the rule conflicts with IC 26-1-4.1 and indirectly affects another party to the funds transfer who does not consent to the rule. A funds-transfer system rule may also govern rights and obligations of parties other than participating banks using the system to the extent stated in IC 26-1-4.1-404(c), IC 26-1-4.1-405(d), and IC 26-1-4.1-507(c).
As added by P.L.189-1991, SEC.4.
2023 Indiana Code › Title 26. Commercial Law › Article 1. Uniform Commercial Code › Chapter 4.1. Fund Transfers › 26-1-4.1-502. Creditor Process Served on Receiving Bank; Setoff by Beneficiary's Bank

Sec. 502. (a) As used in this section, "creditor process" means levy, attachment, garnishment, notice of lien, sequestration, or similar process issued by or on behalf of a creditor or other claimant with respect to an account.
(b) This subsection applies to creditor process with respect to an authorized account of the sender of a payment order if the creditor process is served on the receiving bank. For the purpose of determining rights with respect to the creditor process, if the receiving bank accepts the payment order the balance in the authorized account is deemed to be reduced by the amount of the payment order to the extent the bank did not otherwise receive payment of the order, unless the creditor process is served at a time and in a manner affording the bank a reasonable opportunity to act on it before the bank accepts the payment order.
(c) If a beneficiary's bank has received a payment order for payment to the beneficiary's account in the bank, the following rules apply:
(1) The bank may credit the beneficiary's account. The amount credited may be set off against an obligation owed by the beneficiary to the bank or may be applied to satisfy creditor process served on the bank with respect to the account.
(2) The bank may credit the beneficiary's account and allow withdrawal of the amount credited unless creditor process with respect to the account is served at a time and in a manner affording the bank a reasonable opportunity to act to prevent withdrawal.
(3) If creditor process with respect to the beneficiary's account has been served and the bank has had a reasonable opportunity to act on it, the bank may not reject the payment order except for a reason unrelated to the service of process.
(d) Creditor process with respect to a payment by the originator to the beneficiary pursuant to a funds transfer may be served only on the beneficiary's bank with respect to the debt owed by that bank to the beneficiary. Any other bank served with the creditor process is not obliged to act with respect to the process.
As added by P.L.189-1991, SEC.4.
2023 Indiana Code › Title 26. Commercial Law › Article 1. Uniform Commercial Code › Chapter 4.1. Fund Transfers › 26-1-4.1-503. Injunction or Restraining Order With Respect to Funds Transfer

Sec. 503. For proper cause and in compliance with applicable law, a court may restrain (i) a person from issuing a payment order to initiate a funds transfer, (ii) an originator's bank from executing the payment order of the originator, or (iii) the beneficiary's bank from releasing funds to the beneficiary or the beneficiary from withdrawing the funds. A court may not otherwise restrain a person from issuing a payment order, paying or receiving payment of a payment order, or otherwise acting with respect to a funds transfer.
As added by P.L.189-1991, SEC.4.
2023 Indiana Code › Title 26. Commercial Law › Article 1. Uniform Commercial Code › Chapter 4.1. Fund Transfers › 26-1-4.1-504. Order in Which Items and Payment Orders May Be Charged to Account; Order of Withdrawals From Account

Sec. 504. (a) If a receiving bank has received more than one (1) payment order of the sender or one (1) or more payment orders and other items that are payable from the sender's account, the bank may charge the sender's account with respect to the various orders and items in any sequence.
(b) In determining whether a credit to an account has been withdrawn by the holder of the account or applied to a debt of the holder of the account, credits first made to the account are first withdrawn or applied.
As added by P.L.189-1991, SEC.4.
2023 Indiana Code › Title 26. Commercial Law › Article 1. Uniform Commercial Code › Chapter 4.1. Fund Transfers › 26-1-4.1-505. Preclusion of Objection to Debit of Customer's Account

Sec. 505. If a receiving bank has received payment from its customer with respect to a payment order issued in the name of the customer as sender and accepted by the bank, and the customer received notification reasonably identifying the order, the customer is precluded from asserting that the bank is not entitled to retain the payment unless the customer notifies the bank of the customer's objection to the payment within one (1) year after the notification was received by the customer.
As added by P.L.189-1991, SEC.4.
2023 Indiana Code › Title 26. Commercial Law › Article 1. Uniform Commercial Code › Chapter 4.1. Fund Transfers › 26-1-4.1-506. Rate of Interest

Sec. 506. (a) If, under IC 26-1-4.1, a receiving bank is obliged to pay interest with respect to a payment order issued to the bank, the amount payable may be determined (i) by agreement of the sender and receiving bank, or (ii) by a funds-transfer system rule if the payment order is transmitted through a funds-transfer system.
(b) If the amount of interest is not determined by an agreement or rule as stated in subsection (a), the amount is calculated by multiplying the applicable Federal Funds rate by the amount on which interest is payable, and then multiplying the product by the number of days for which interest is payable. The applicable Federal Funds rate is the average of the Federal Funds rates published by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York for each of the days for which interest is payable divided by three hundred sixty (360). The Federal Funds rate for any day on which a published rate is not available is the same as the published rate for the next preceding day for which there is a published rate. If a receiving bank that accepted a payment order is required to refund payment to the sender of the order because the funds transfer was not completed, but the failure to complete was not due to any fault by the bank, the interest payable is reduced by a percentage equal to the reserve requirement on deposits of the receiving bank.
As added by P.L.189-1991, SEC.4.
2023 Indiana Code › Title 26. Commercial Law › Article 1. Uniform Commercial Code › Chapter 4.1. Fund Transfers › 26-1-4.1-507. Choice of Law

Sec. 507. (a) The following rules apply unless the affected parties otherwise agree or subsection (c) applies:
(1) The rights and obligations between the sender of a payment order and the receiving bank are governed by the law of the jurisdiction in which the receiving bank is located.
(2) The rights and obligations between the beneficiary's bank and the beneficiary are governed by the law of the jurisdiction in which the beneficiary's bank is located.
(3) The issue of when payment is made pursuant to a funds transfer by the originator to the beneficiary is governed by the law of the jurisdiction in which the beneficiary's bank is located.
(b) If the parties described in each paragraph of subsection (a) have made an agreement selecting the law of a particular jurisdiction to govern rights and obligations between each other, the law of that jurisdiction governs those rights and obligations, whether or not the payment order or the funds transfer bears a reasonable relation to that jurisdiction.
(c) A funds-transfer system rule may select the law of a particular jurisdiction to govern (i) rights and obligations between participating banks with respect to payment orders transmitted or processed through the system, or (ii) the rights and obligations of some or all parties to a funds transfer any part of which is carried out by means of the system. A choice of law made pursuant to clause (i) is binding on participating banks. A choice of law made pursuant to clause (ii) is binding on the originator, other sender, or a receiving bank having notice that the funds-transfer system might be used in the funds transfer and of the choice of law by the system when the originator, other sender, or receiving bank issued or accepted a payment order. The beneficiary of a funds transfer is bound by the choice of law if, when the funds transfer is initiated, the beneficiary has notice that the funds-transfer system might be used in the funds transfer and of the choice of law by the system. The law of a jurisdiction selected pursuant to this subsection may govern, whether or not that law bears a reasonable relation to the matter in issue.
(d) In the event of inconsistency between an agreement under subsection (b) and a choice-of-law rule under subsection (c), the agreement under subsection (b) prevails.
(e) If a funds transfer is made by use of more than one funds-transfer system and there is inconsistency between choice-of-law rules of the systems, the matter in issue is governed by the law of the selected jurisdiction that has the most significant relationship to the matter in issue.
As added by P.L.189-1991, SEC.4.
2023 Indiana Code › Title 26. Commercial Law › Article 1. Uniform Commercial Code › Chapter 5.1. Letters of Credit › 26-1-5.1-101. Short Title; Scope

Sec. 101. (a) IC 26-1-5.1 shall be known and may be cited as Uniform Commercial Code ─ Letters of Credit.
(b) IC 26-1-5.1 applies to a letter of credit that is issued after June 30, 1996, and does not apply to a transaction, event, obligation, or duty arising out of or associated with a letter of credit that was issued before July 1, 1996.
(c) A transaction arising out of or associated with a letter of credit that was issued before July 1, 1996, and the rights, obligations, and interests flowing from that transaction:
(1) are governed by IC 26-1-5 (before its repeal) and any other law amended by senate enrolled act 193 of the 1996 regular session of the general assembly as if repeal or amendment had not occurred; and
(2) may be terminated, completed, consummated, or enforced under IC 26-1-5 (before its repeal) or other law (before its amendment by senate enrolled act 193 of the 1996 regular session of the general assembly).
As added by P.L.183-1996, SEC.4.
2023 Indiana Code › Title 26. Commercial Law › Article 1. Uniform Commercial Code › Chapter 5.1. Letters of Credit › 26-1-5.1-103. Applicability to Ic 26-1-8.1; Ability to Vary by Agreement; Independence of Rights and Obligations Under Letter of Credit

Sec. 103. (a) IC 26-1-8.1 applies to letters of credit and to certain rights and obligations arising out of transactions involving letters of credit.
(b) The statement of a rule in IC 26-1-5.1 does not by itself require, imply, or negate application of the same or a different rule to a situation not provided for, or to a person not specified, in IC 26-1-5.1.
(c) With the exception of this subsection, subsections (a) and (d), IC 26-1-5.1-102(a)(9) and IC 26-1-5.1-102(a)(10), IC 26-1-5.1-106(d), and IC 26-1-5.1-114(d), and except to the extent prohibited in IC 26-1-1-102(3) and IC 26-1-5.1-117(d), the effect of IC 26-1-5.1 may be varied by agreement or by a provision stated or incorporated by reference in an undertaking. A term in an agreement or undertaking generally excusing liability or generally limiting remedies for failure to perform obligations is not sufficient to vary obligations prescribed by IC 26-1-5.1.
(d) Rights and obligations of an issuer to a beneficiary or a nominated person under a letter of credit are independent of the existence, performance, or nonperformance of a contract or arrangement out of which the letter of credit arises or which underlies it, including contracts or arrangements between the issuer and the applicant and between the applicant and the beneficiary.
As added by P.L.183-1996, SEC.4.
2023 Indiana Code › Title 26. Commercial Law › Article 1. Uniform Commercial Code › Chapter 5.1. Letters of Credit › 26-1-5.1-104. Form of Issuance; Signed Record

Sec. 104. A letter of credit, confirmation, advice, transfer, amendment, or cancellation may be issued in any form that is a signed record.
As added by P.L.183-1996, SEC.4. Amended by P.L.199-2023, SEC.31.
2023 Indiana Code › Title 26. Commercial Law › Article 1. Uniform Commercial Code › Chapter 5.1. Letters of Credit › 26-1-5.1-106. Time and Effect of Establishment of Credit; Expiration

Sec. 106. (a) A letter of credit is issued and becomes enforceable according to its terms against the issuer when the issuer sends or otherwise transmits it to the person requested to advise or to the beneficiary. A letter of credit is revocable only if it so provides.
(b) After a letter of credit is issued, rights and obligations of a beneficiary, applicant, confirmer, and issuer are not affected by an amendment or cancellation to which that person has not consented except to the extent the letter of credit provides that it is revocable or that the issuer may amend or cancel the letter of credit without that consent.
(c) If there is no stated expiration date or other provision that determines its duration, a letter of credit expires one (1) year after its stated date of issuance or, if none is stated, after the date on which it is issued.
(d) A letter of credit that states that it is perpetual expires five (5) years after its stated date of issuance, or if none is stated, after the date on which it is issued.
As added by P.L.183-1996, SEC.4.
2023 Indiana Code › Title 26. Commercial Law › Article 1. Uniform Commercial Code › Chapter 5.1. Letters of Credit › 26-1-5.1-107. Confirmation; Advice of Credit; Error in Statement Terms; Notice to Transfer Beneficiary

Sec. 107. (a) A confirmer is directly obligated on a letter of credit and has the rights and obligations of an issuer to the extent of its confirmation. The confirmer also has rights against and obligations to the issuer as if the issuer were an applicant and the confirmer had issued the letter of credit at the request and for the account of the issuer.
(b) A nominated person who is not a confirmer is not obligated to honor or otherwise give value for a presentation.
(c) A person requested to advise may decline to act as an adviser. An adviser that is not a confirmer is not obligated to honor or give value for a presentation. An adviser undertakes to the issuer and to the beneficiary accurately to advise the terms of the letter of credit, confirmation, amendment, or advice received by that person and undertakes to the beneficiary to check the apparent authenticity of the request to advise. Even if the advice is inaccurate, the letter of credit, confirmation, or amendment is enforceable as issued.
(d) A person who notifies a transferee beneficiary of the terms of a letter of credit, confirmation, amendment, or advice has the rights and obligations of an adviser under subsection (c). The terms in the notice to the transferee beneficiary may differ from the terms in any notice to the transferor beneficiary to the extent permitted by the letter of credit, confirmation, amendment, or advice received by the person who so notifies.
As added by P.L.183-1996, SEC.4.
2023 Indiana Code › Title 26. Commercial Law › Article 1. Uniform Commercial Code › Chapter 5.1. Letters of Credit › 26-1-5.1-109. Fraud and Forgery

Sec. 109. (a) If a presentation is made that appears on its face strictly to comply with the terms and conditions of the letter of credit, but a required document is forged or materially fraudulent, or honor of the presentation would facilitate a material fraud by the beneficiary on the issuer or applicant:
(1) the issuer shall honor the presentation, if honor is demanded by:
(i) a nominated person who has given value in good faith and without notice of forgery or material fraud;
(ii) a confirmer who has honored its confirmation in good faith;
(iii) a holder in due course of a draft drawn under the letter of credit which was taken after acceptance by the issuer or nominated person; or
(iv) an assignee of the issuer's or nominated person's deferred obligation that was taken for value and without notice of forgery or material fraud after the obligation was incurred by the issuer or nominated person; and
(2) the issuer, acting in good faith, may honor or dishonor the presentation in any other case.
(b) If an applicant claims that a required document is forged or materially fraudulent or that honor of the presentation would facilitate a material fraud by the beneficiary on the issuer or applicant, a court of competent jurisdiction may temporarily or permanently enjoin the issuer from honoring a presentation or grant similar relief against the issuer or other persons only if the court finds that:
(1) the relief is not prohibited under the law applicable to an accepted draft or deferred obligation incurred by the issuer;
(2) a beneficiary, issuer, or nominated person who may be adversely affected is adequately protected against loss that it may suffer because the relief is granted;
(3) all of the conditions to entitle a person to the relief under the law of Indiana have been met; and
(4) on the basis of the information submitted to the court, the applicant is more likely than not to succeed under its claim of forgery or material fraud and the person demanding honor does not qualify for protection under subsection (a)(1).
As added by P.L.183-1996, SEC.4.
2023 Indiana Code › Title 26. Commercial Law › Article 1. Uniform Commercial Code › Chapter 5.1. Letters of Credit › 26-1-5.1-110. Warranties on Transfer and Presentment

Sec. 110. (a) If its presentation is honored, the beneficiary warrants:
(1) to the issuer, any other person to whom presentation is made, and the applicant that there is no fraud or forgery of the kind described in IC 26-1-5.1-109(a); and
(2) to the applicant that the drawing does not violate any agreement between the applicant and beneficiary or any other agreement intended by them to be augmented by the letter of credit.
(b) The warranties in subsection (a) are in addition to warranties arising under IC 26-1-3.1, IC 26-1-4, IC 26-1-7, and IC 26-1-8.1 because of the presentation or transfer of documents covered by any of those articles.
As added by P.L.183-1996, SEC.4.
2023 Indiana Code › Title 26. Commercial Law › Article 1. Uniform Commercial Code › Chapter 5.1. Letters of Credit › 26-1-5.1-111. Remedies for Wrongful Dishonor, Repudiation, or Breach of Obligation

Sec. 111. (a) If an issuer wrongfully dishonors or repudiates its obligation to pay money under a letter of credit before presentation, the beneficiary, successor, or nominated person presenting on its own behalf may recover from the issuer the amount that is the subject of the dishonor or repudiation. If the issuer's obligation under the letter of credit is not for the payment of money, the claimant may obtain specific performance or, at the claimant's election, recover an amount equal to the value of performance from the issuer. In either case, the claimant may also recover incidental but not consequential damages. The claimant is not obligated to take action to avoid damages that might be due from the issuer under this subsection. If, although not obligated to do so, the claimant avoids damages, the claimant's recovery from the issuer must be reduced by the amount of damages avoided. The issuer has the burden of proving the amount of damages avoided. In the case of repudiation the claimant need not present any document.
(b) If an issuer wrongfully dishonors a draft or demand presented under a letter of credit or honors a draft or demand in breach of its obligation to the applicant, the applicant may recover damages resulting from the breach, including incidental but not consequential damages, less any amount saved as a result of the breach.
(c) If an adviser or nominated person other than a confirmer breaches an obligation under IC 26-1-5.1 or an issuer breaches an obligation not covered in subsection (a) or (b), a person to whom the obligation is owed may recover damages resulting from the breach, including incidental but not consequential damages, less any amount saved as a result of the breach. To the extent of the confirmation, a confirmer has the liability of an issuer specified in this subsection and subsections (a) and (b).
(d) An issuer, nominated person, or adviser who is found liable under subsection (a), (b), or (c) shall pay interest on the amount owed thereunder from the date of wrongful dishonor or other appropriate date.
(e) Reasonable attorney's fees and other expenses of litigation must be awarded to the prevailing party in an action in which a remedy is sought under IC 26-1-5.1.
(f) Damages that would otherwise be payable by a party for breach of an obligation under IC 26-1-5.1 may be liquidated by agreement or undertaking, but only in an amount or by a formula that is reasonable in light of the harm anticipated.
As added by P.L.183-1996, SEC.4.
2023 Indiana Code › Title 26. Commercial Law › Article 1. Uniform Commercial Code › Chapter 5.1. Letters of Credit › 26-1-5.1-112. Transferability

Sec. 112. (a) Except as otherwise provided in IC 26-1-5.1-113, unless a letter of credit provides that it is transferable, the right of a beneficiary to draw or otherwise demand performance under a letter of credit may not be transferred.
(b) Even if a letter of credit provides that it is transferable, the issuer may refuse to recognize or carry out a transfer if:
(1) the transfer would violate applicable law; or
(2) the transferor or transferee has failed to comply with any requirement stated in the letter of credit or any other requirement relating to transfer imposed by the issuer which is within the standard practice referred to in IC 26-1-5.1-108(e) or is otherwise reasonable under the circumstances.
As added by P.L.183-1996, SEC.4.
2023 Indiana Code › Title 26. Commercial Law › Article 1. Uniform Commercial Code › Chapter 5.1. Letters of Credit › 26-1-5.1-113. Successors of Beneficiaries; Rights; Recognition

Sec. 113. (a) A successor of a beneficiary may consent to amendments, sign and present documents, and receive payment or other items of value in the name of the beneficiary without disclosing its status as a successor.
(b) A successor of a beneficiary may consent to amendments, sign and present documents, and receive payment or other items of value in its own name as the disclosed successor of the beneficiary. Except as otherwise provided in subsection (e), an issuer shall recognize a disclosed successor of a beneficiary as beneficiary in full substitution for its predecessor upon compliance with the requirements for recognition by the issuer of a transfer of drawing rights by operation of law under the standard practice referred to in IC 26-1-5.1-108(e) or, in the absence of such a practice, compliance with other reasonable procedures sufficient to protect the issuer.
(c) An issuer is not obliged to determine whether a purported successor is a successor of a beneficiary or whether the signature of a purported successor is genuine or authorized.
(d) Honor of a purported successor's apparently complying presentation under subsection (a) or (b) has the consequences specified in IC 26-1-5.1-108(i) even if the purported successor is not the successor of a beneficiary. Documents signed in the name of the beneficiary or of a disclosed successor by a person who is neither the beneficiary nor the successor of the beneficiary are forged documents for the purposes of IC 26-1-5.1-109.
(e) An issuer whose rights of reimbursement are not covered by subsection (d) or substantially similar law and any confirmer or nominated person may decline to recognize a presentation under subsection (b).
(f) A beneficiary whose name is changed after the issuance of a letter of credit has the same rights and obligations as a successor of a beneficiary under this section.
As added by P.L.183-1996, SEC.4.
2023 Indiana Code › Title 26. Commercial Law › Article 1. Uniform Commercial Code › Chapter 5.1. Letters of Credit › 26-1-5.1-114. Proceeds of Letter of Credit; Assignment

Sec. 114. (a) In this section, "proceeds of a letter of credit" means the cash, check, accepted draft, or other item of value paid or delivered upon honor or giving of value by the issuer or any nominated person under the letter of credit. The term does not include a beneficiary's drawing rights or documents presented by the beneficiary.
(b) A beneficiary may assign its right to part or all of the proceeds of a letter of credit. The beneficiary may do so before presentation as a present assignment of its right to receive proceeds contingent upon its compliance with the terms and conditions of the letter of credit.
(c) An issuer or nominated person need not recognize an assignment of proceeds of a letter of credit until it consents to the assignment.
(d) An issuer or nominated person has no obligation to give or withhold its consent to an assignment of proceeds of a letter of credit, but consent may not be unreasonably withheld if the assignee possesses and exhibits the letter of credit and presentation of the letter of credit is a condition to honor.
(e) Rights of a transferee beneficiary or nominated person are independent of the beneficiary's assignment of the proceeds of a letter of credit and are superior to the assignee's right to the proceeds.
(f) Neither the rights recognized by this section between an assignee and an issuer, transferee beneficiary, or nominated person nor the issuer's or nominated person's payment of proceeds to an assignee or a third person affects the rights between the assignee and any person other than the issuer, transferee beneficiary, or nominated person. The mode of creating and perfecting a security interest in or granting an assignment of a beneficiary's rights to proceeds is governed by IC 26-1-9.1 or other law. Against persons other than the issuer, transferee beneficiary, or nominated person, the rights and obligations arising upon the creation of a security interest or other assignment of a beneficiary's right to proceeds and its perfection are governed by IC 26-1-9.1 or other law.
As added by P.L.183-1996, SEC.4. Amended by P.L.57-2000, SEC.30.
2023 Indiana Code › Title 26. Commercial Law › Article 1. Uniform Commercial Code › Chapter 5.1. Letters of Credit › 26-1-5.1-115. Statute of Limitations

Sec. 115. An action to enforce a right or obligation arising under IC 26-1-5.1 must be commenced within one (1) year after the expiration date of the relevant letter of credit or one (1) year after the cause of action accrues, whichever occurs later. A cause of action accrues when the breach occurs, regardless of the aggrieved party's lack of knowledge of the breach.
As added by P.L.183-1996, SEC.4.
2023 Indiana Code › Title 26. Commercial Law › Article 1. Uniform Commercial Code › Chapter 5.1. Letters of Credit › 26-1-5.1-116. Liability of Issuer, Nominated Person, or Advisor; Governing Law; Bank Branches; Rules of Custom or Practice; Choice of Forum

Sec. 116. (a) The liability of an issuer, nominated person, or adviser for action or omission is governed by the law of the jurisdiction chosen by an agreement in the form of a record signed by the affected parties or by a provision in the person's letter of credit, confirmation, or other undertaking. The jurisdiction whose law is chosen need not bear any relation to the transaction.
(b) Unless subsection (a) applies, the liability of an issuer, nominated person, or adviser for action or omission is governed by the law of the jurisdiction in which the person is located. The person is considered to be located at the address indicated in the person's undertaking. If more than one (1) address is indicated, the person is considered to be located at the address from which the person's undertaking was issued.
(c) For the purpose of jurisdiction, choice of law, and recognition of interbranch letters of credit, but not enforcement of a judgment, all branches of a bank are considered separate juridical entities and a bank is considered to be located at the place where its relevant branch is considered to be located under subsection (d).
(d) A branch of a bank is considered to be located at the address indicated in the branch's undertaking. If more than one (1) address is indicated, the branch is considered to be located at the address from which the undertaking was issued.
(e) Except as otherwise provided in this subsection, the liability of an issuer, nominated person, or adviser is governed by any rules of custom or practice, such as the Uniform Customs and Practice for Documentary Credits, to which the letter of credit, confirmation, or other undertaking is expressly made subject. If:
(i) IC 26-1-5.1 would govern the liability of an issuer, nominated person, or adviser under subsection (a) or (b);
(ii) the relevant undertaking incorporates rules of custom or practice; and
(iii) there is conflict between IC 26-1-5.1 and those rules as applied to that undertaking;
those rules govern except to the extent of any conflict with the nonvariable provisions specified in IC 26-1-5.1-103(c).
(f) If there is conflict between IC 26-1-5.1 and IC 26-1-3.1, IC 26-1-4, IC 26-1-4.1, or IC 26-1-9.1, IC 26-1-5.1 governs.
(g) The forum for settling disputes arising out of an undertaking within IC 26-1-5.1 may be chosen in the manner and with the binding effect that governing law may be chosen in accordance with subsection (a).
As added by P.L.183-1996, SEC.4. Amended by P.L.57-2000, SEC.31; P.L.199-2023, SEC.32.
2023 Indiana Code › Title 26. Commercial Law › Article 1. Uniform Commercial Code › Chapter 5.1. Letters of Credit › 26-1-5.1-117. Rights of Subrogation

Sec. 117. (a) An issuer that honors a beneficiary's presentation is subrogated to the rights of the beneficiary to the same extent as if the issuer were a secondary obligor of the underlying obligation owed to the beneficiary and of the applicant to the same extent as if the issuer were the secondary obligor of the underlying obligation owed to the applicant.
(b) An applicant that reimburses an issuer is subrogated to the rights of the issuer against any beneficiary, presenter, or nominated person to the same extent as if the applicant were the secondary obligor of the obligations owed to the issuer and has the rights of subrogation of the issuer to the rights of the beneficiary stated in subsection (a).
(c) A nominated person who pays or gives value against a draft or demand presented under a letter of credit is subrogated to the rights of:
(1) the issuer against the applicant to the same extent as if the nominated person were a secondary obligor of the obligation owed to the issuer by the applicant;
(2) the beneficiary to the same extent as if the nominated person were a secondary obligor of the underlying obligation owed to the beneficiary; and
(3) the applicant to the same extent as if the nominated person were a secondary obligor of the underlying obligation owed to the applicant.
(d) Notwithstanding any agreement or term to the contrary, the rights of subrogation stated in subsections (a) and (b) do not arise until the issuer honors the letter of credit or otherwise pays, and the rights in subsection (c) do not arise until the nominated person pays or otherwise gives value. Until then, the issuer, the nominated person, and the applicant do not derive under this section present or prospective rights forming the basis of a claim, defense, or excuse.
As added by P.L.183-1996, SEC.4.
2023 Indiana Code › Title 26. Commercial Law › Article 1. Uniform Commercial Code › Chapter 5.1. Letters of Credit › 26-1-5.1-118. Security Interest of Issuer or Nominated Person

Sec. 118. (a) An issuer or nominated person has a security interest in a document presented under a letter of credit to the extent that the issuer or nominated person honors or gives value for the presentation.
(b) So long as and to the extent that an issuer or nominated person has not been reimbursed or has not otherwise recovered the value given with respect to a security interest in a document under subsection (a), the security interest continues and is subject to IC 26-1-9.1, but:
(1) a security agreement is not necessary to make the security interest enforceable under IC 26-1-9.1-203(b)(3);
(2) if the document is presented in a medium other than a written or other tangible medium, the security interest is perfected; and
(3) if the document is presented in a written or other tangible medium and is not a certificated security, chattel paper, a document of title, an instrument, or a letter of credit, the security interest is perfected and has priority over a conflicting security interest in the document so long as the debtor does not have possession of the document.
As added by P.L.57-2000, SEC.32.
2023 Indiana Code › Title 26. Commercial Law › Article 1. Uniform Commercial Code › Chapter 6.2. Enforcement of Rights and Obligations Under Repealed Uniform Bulk Sales Law › 26-1-6.2-1. Validity and Enforcement of Rights and Obligations Under Prior Law

Sec. 1. Rights and obligations that arose under IC 26-1-6.1 before its repeal by P.L.77-2007 remain valid and may be enforced as though IC 26-1-6.1 had not been repealed.
As added by P.L.16-2009, SEC.27.
2023 Indiana Code › Title 26. Commercial Law › Article 1. Uniform Commercial Code › Chapter 7. Documents of Title › 26-1-7-101. Short Title

Sec. 101. This chapter may be cited as Uniform Commercial Code ─ Documents of Title.
Formerly: Acts 1963, c.317, s.7-101. As amended by P.L.152-1986, SEC.244; P.L.143-2007, SEC.24.