2023 Indiana Code › Title 27. Insurance › Article 8. Life, Accident, and Health › Chapter 31. Interstate Insurance Product Regulation Compact › 27-8-31-8. Rules; Uniform Standards; Opting Out; Judicial Review

Sec. 8. (a) The commission shall adopt reasonable rules, including uniform standards, and operating procedures in order to effectively and efficiently achieve the purposes of this compact. However, if the commission exercises the commission's rulemaking authority in a manner that is beyond the scope of the purposes of this chapter or the powers granted in this chapter, the action by the commission is invalid and has no force and effect.
(b) Rules and operating procedures shall be made according to a rulemaking process that substantially conforms to the principles of the model state administrative procedure act of 1981, as amended, as may be appropriate to the operations of the commission. Before the commission adopts a uniform standard, the commission shall give written notice to the relevant state legislative committees in each compacting state responsible for insurance issues of the commission's intention to adopt the uniform standard. The commission, in adopting a uniform standard, shall fully consider all submitted materials and issue a concise explanation of the commission's decision.
(c) A uniform standard becomes effective ninety (90) days after the uniform standard's adoption by the commission or on a later date as the commission may determine. However, a compacting state may opt out of a uniform standard as provided in subsection (d). All other rules and operating procedures and amendments to the other rules and operating procedures become effective as of the date specified in each rule, operating procedure, or amendment.
(d) A compacting state may opt out of a uniform standard, either by legislation or by rule adopted by the insurance department under the compacting state's administrative procedure act. If a compacting state elects to opt out of a uniform standard by rule, the compacting state must:
(1) give written notice to the commission not later than ten (10) business days after the uniform standard is adopted or at the time the state becomes a compacting state; and
(2) find that the uniform standard does not provide reasonable protections to the citizens of the state, given the conditions in the state. The commissioner shall make specific findings of fact and conclusions of law, based on a preponderance of the evidence, detailing the conditions in the state that warrant a departure from the uniform standard and determining that the uniform standard would not reasonably protect the citizens of the state. The commissioner must balance, consider, and find that the conditions in the state and needs of the citizens of the state outweigh the following factors:
(A) The intent of the legislature to participate in, and the benefits of, an interstate agreement to establish national uniform consumer protections for the products subject to this chapter.
(B) The presumption that a uniform standard adopted by the commission provides reasonable protections to consumers of the relevant product.
However, a compacting state may, at the time of the compacting state's enactment of this compact, prospectively opt out of all uniform standards involving long term care insurance products by expressly providing for an opt out in the enacted compact, and the opt out shall not be treated as a material variance in the offer or acceptance of any state to participate in this compact. The opt out is effective at the time of enactment of this compact by the compacting state and shall apply to all existing uniform standards involving long term care insurance products and those subsequently adopted.
(e) If a compacting state elects to opt out of a uniform standard, the uniform standard remains applicable in the compacting state electing to opt out until the time the opt out legislation is enacted or the regulation opting out becomes effective. Once the opt out of a uniform standard by a compacting state becomes effective as provided under the laws of the state, the uniform standard shall have no further force and effect in the state unless and until the legislation or regulation implementing the opt out is repealed or otherwise becomes ineffective under the laws of the state. If a compacting state opts out of a uniform standard after the uniform standard has been made effective in the state, the opt out shall have the same prospective effect as provided under section 15 of this chapter for withdrawals.
(f) If a compacting state has formally initiated the process of opting out of a uniform standard by rule while the regulatory opt out is pending, the compacting state may petition the commission, not less than fifteen (15) days before the effective date of the uniform standard, to stay the effectiveness of the uniform standard in the compacting state. The commission may grant a stay if the commission determines the regulatory opt out is being pursued in a reasonable manner and there is a likelihood of success. If a stay is granted or extended by the commission, the stay or extension may postpone the effective date by not more than ninety (90) days, unless the stay is extended by the commission. However, a stay may not be permitted to remain in effect for more than one (1) year unless the compacting state can show extraordinary circumstances that warrant a continuance of the stay, including the existence of a legal challenge that prevents the compacting state from opting out. A stay may be terminated by the commission on notice that the rulemaking process has been terminated.
(g) Not later than thirty (30) days after a rule or operating procedure is adopted, any person may file a petition for judicial review of the rule or operating procedure. However, the filing of a petition shall not stay or otherwise prevent the rule or operating procedure from becoming effective unless the court finds that the petitioner has a substantial likelihood of success. The court shall give deference to the actions of the commission consistent with applicable law and shall not find the rule or operating procedure to be unlawful if the rule or operating procedure represents a reasonable exercise of the commission's authority.
As added by P.L.138-2005, SEC.3.