reglab/statecodes huggingface dataset:
2023 Idaho Code › Title 28 - COMMERCIAL TRANSACTIONS › Chapter 4 - UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE — BANK DEPOSITS AND COLLECTIONS › Part 6 - FUNDS TRANSFERS › Section 28-4-617 - ACCEPTANCE OF PAYMENT ORDER.

28-4-617. ACCEPTANCE OF PAYMENT ORDER. (1) Subject to subsection (4) of this section, a receiving bank other than the beneficiary’s bank accepts a payment order when it executes the order.
(2) Subject to subsections (3) and (4) of this section, a beneficiary’s bank accepts a payment order at the earliest of the following times:
(a) when the bank (i) pays the beneficiary as stated in section 28-4-630(1) or 28-4-630(2), or (ii) notifies the beneficiary of receipt of the order or that the account of the beneficiary has been credited with respect to the order unless the notice indicates that the bank is rejecting the order or that funds with respect to the order may not be withdrawn or used until receipt of payment from the sender of the order;
(b) when the bank receives payment of the entire amount of the sender’s order pursuant to section 28-4-628(1)(a) or 28-4-628(1)(b); or
(c) the opening of the next funds-transfer business day of the bank following the payment date of the order if, at that time, the amount of the sender’s order is fully covered by a withdrawable credit balance in an authorized account of the sender or the bank has otherwise received full payment from the sender, unless the order was rejected before that time or is rejected within (i) one (1) hour after that time, or (ii) one (1) hour after the opening of the next business day of the sender following the payment date if that time is later. If notice of rejection is received by the sender after the payment date and the authorized account of the sender does not bear interest, the bank is obliged to pay interest to the sender on the amount of the order for the number of days elapsing after the payment date to the day the sender receives notice or learns that the order was not accepted, counting that day as an elapsed day. If the withdrawable credit balance during that period falls below the amount of the order, the amount of interest payable is reduced accordingly.
(3) Acceptance of a payment order cannot occur before the order is received by the receiving bank. Acceptance does not occur under subsection (2)(b) or (2)(c) of this section if the beneficiary of the payment order does not have an account with the receiving bank, the account has been closed, or the receiving bank is not permitted by law to receive credits for the beneficiary’s account.
(4) A payment order issued to the originator’s bank cannot be accepted until the payment date if the bank is the beneficiary’s bank, or the execution date if the bank is not the beneficiary’s bank. If the originator’s bank executes the originator’s payment order before the execution date or pays the beneficiary of the originator’s payment order before the payment date and the payment order is subsequently cancelled pursuant to section 28-4-619(2), the bank may recover from the beneficiary any payment received to the extent allowed by the law governing mistake and restitution.
History:
[28-4-617, added 1991, ch. 135, sec. 1, p. 304.]
2023 Idaho Code › Title 28 - COMMERCIAL TRANSACTIONS › Chapter 4 - UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE — BANK DEPOSITS AND COLLECTIONS › Part 6 - FUNDS TRANSFERS › Section 28-4-618 - REJECTION OF PAYMENT ORDER.

28-4-618. REJECTION OF PAYMENT ORDER. (1) A payment order is rejected by the receiving bank by a notice of rejection transmitted to the sender orally, electronically, or in writing. A notice of rejection need not use any particular words and is sufficient if it indicates that the receiving bank is rejecting the order or will not execute or pay the order. Rejection is effective when the notice is given if transmission is by a means that is reasonable in the circumstances. If notice of rejection is given by a means that is not reasonable, rejection is effective when the notice is received. If an agreement of the sender and receiving bank establishes the means to be used to reject a payment order,
(a) any means complying with the agreement is reasonable, and
(b) any means not complying is not reasonable unless no significant delay in receipt of the notice resulted from the use of the noncomplying means.
(2) The provisions of this subsection apply if a receiving bank other than the beneficiary’s bank fails to execute a payment order despite the existence on the execution date of a withdrawable credit balance in an authorized account of the sender sufficient to cover the order. If the sender does not receive notice of rejection of the order on the execution date and the authorized account of the sender does not bear interest, the bank is obliged to pay interest to the sender on the amount of the order for the number of days elapsing after the execution date to the earlier of the day the order is cancelled pursuant to section 28-4-619(4) or the day the sender receives notice or learns that the order was not executed, counting the final day of the period as an elapsed day. If the withdrawable credit balance during that period falls below the amount of the order, the amount of interest is reduced accordingly.
(3) If a receiving bank suspends payments, all unaccepted payment orders issued to it are deemed rejected at the time the bank suspends payments.
(4) Acceptance of a payment order precludes a later rejection of the order. Rejection of a payment order precludes a later acceptance of the order.
History:
[28-4-618, added 1991, ch. 135, sec. 1, p. 305.]
2023 Idaho Code › Title 28 - COMMERCIAL TRANSACTIONS › Chapter 4 - UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE — BANK DEPOSITS AND COLLECTIONS › Part 6 - FUNDS TRANSFERS › Section 28-4-620 - LIABILITY AND DUTY OF RECEIVING BANK REGARDING UNACCEPTED PAYMENT ORDER.

28-4-620. LIABILITY AND DUTY OF RECEIVING BANK REGARDING UNACCEPTED PAYMENT ORDER. If a receiving bank fails to accept a payment order that it is obliged by express agreement to accept, the bank is liable for breach of the agreement to the extent provided in the agreement or in this part, but does not otherwise have any duty to accept a payment order or, before acceptance, to take any action, or refrain from taking action, with respect to the order except as provided in this part or by express agreement. Liability based on acceptance arises only when acceptance occurs as stated in section 28-4-617, and liability is limited to that provided in this part. A receiving bank is not the agent of the sender or beneficiary of the payment order it accepts, or of any other party to the funds transfer, and the bank owes no duty to any party to the funds transfer except as provided in this part or by express agreement.
History:
[28-4-620, added 1991, ch. 135, sec. 1, p. 307.]
2023 Idaho Code › Title 28 - COMMERCIAL TRANSACTIONS › Chapter 4 - UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE — BANK DEPOSITS AND COLLECTIONS › Part 6 - FUNDS TRANSFERS › Section 28-4-621 - EXECUTION AND EXECUTION DATE.

28-4-621. EXECUTION AND EXECUTION DATE. (1) A payment order is "executed" by the receiving bank when it issues a payment order intended to carry out the payment order received by the bank. A payment order received by the beneficiary’s bank can be accepted but cannot be executed.
(2) "Execution date" of a payment order means the day on which the receiving bank may properly issue a payment order in execution of the sender’s order. The execution date may be determined by instruction of the sender but cannot be earlier than the day the order is received and, unless otherwise determined, is the day the order is received. If the sender’s instruction states a payment date, the execution date is the payment date or an earlier date on which execution is reasonably necessary to allow payment to the beneficiary on the payment date.
History:
[28-4-621, added 1991, ch. 135, sec. 1, p. 307.]
2023 Idaho Code › Title 28 - COMMERCIAL TRANSACTIONS › Chapter 4 - UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE — BANK DEPOSITS AND COLLECTIONS › Part 6 - FUNDS TRANSFERS › Section 28-4-623 - ERRONEOUS EXECUTION OF PAYMENT ORDER.

28-4-623. ERRONEOUS EXECUTION OF PAYMENT ORDER. (1) A receiving bank that:
(a) executes the payment order of the sender by issuing a payment order in an amount greater than the amount of the sender’s order, or
(b) issues a payment order in execution of the sender’s order and then issues a duplicate order, is entitled to payment of the amount of the sender’s order under section 28-4-627(3) if the provisions of that subsection are otherwise satisfied. The bank is entitled to recover from the beneficiary of the erroneous order the excess payment received to the extent allowed by the law governing mistake and restitution.
(2) A receiving bank that executes the payment order of the sender by issuing a payment order in an amount less than the amount of the sender’s order is entitled to payment of the amount of the sender’s order under section 28-4-627(3) if:
(a) that subsection is otherwise satisfied, and
(b) the bank corrects its mistake by issuing an additional payment order for the benefit of the beneficiary of the sender’s order.
If the error is not corrected, the issuer of the erroneous order is entitled to receive or retain payment from the sender of the order it accepted only to the extent of the amount of the erroneous order. The provisions of this subsection do not apply if the receiving bank executes the sender’s payment order by issuing a payment order in an amount less than the amount of the sender’s order for the purpose of obtaining payment of its charges for services and expenses pursuant to instruction of the sender.
(3) If a receiving bank executes the payment order of the sender by issuing a payment order to a beneficiary different from the beneficiary of the sender’s order and the funds transfer is completed on the basis of that error, the sender of the payment order that was erroneously executed and all previous senders in the funds transfer are not obliged to pay the payment orders they issued. The issuer of the erroneous order is entitled to recover from the beneficiary of the order the payment received to the extent allowed by the law governing mistake and restitution.
History:
[28-4-623, added 1991, ch. 135, sec. 1, p. 308.]
2023 Idaho Code › Title 28 - COMMERCIAL TRANSACTIONS › Chapter 4 - UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE — BANK DEPOSITS AND COLLECTIONS › Part 6 - FUNDS TRANSFERS › Section 28-4-624 - DUTY OF SENDER TO REPORT ERRONEOUSLY EXECUTED PAYMENT ORDER.

28-4-624. DUTY OF SENDER TO REPORT ERRONEOUSLY EXECUTED PAYMENT ORDER. If the sender of a payment order that is erroneously executed as stated in section 28-4-623 receives notification from the receiving bank that the order was executed or that the sender’s account was debited with respect to the order, the sender has a duty to exercise ordinary care to determine, on the basis of information available to the sender, that the order was erroneously executed and to notify the bank of the relevant facts within a reasonable time not exceeding ninety (90) days after the notification from the bank was received by the sender. If the sender fails to perform that duty, the bank is not obliged to pay interest on any amount refundable to the sender under section 28-4-627(4) for the period before the bank learns of the execution error. The bank is not entitled to any recovery from the sender on account of a failure by the sender to perform the duty stated in this section.
History:
[28-4-624, added 1991, ch. 135, sec. 1, p. 309.]
2023 Idaho Code › Title 28 - COMMERCIAL TRANSACTIONS › Chapter 4 - UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE — BANK DEPOSITS AND COLLECTIONS › Part 6 - FUNDS TRANSFERS › Section 28-4-625 - LIABILITY FOR LATE OR IMPROPER EXECUTION OR FAILURE TO EXECUTE PAYMENT ORDER.

28-4-625. LIABILITY FOR LATE OR IMPROPER EXECUTION OR FAILURE TO EXECUTE PAYMENT ORDER. (1) If a funds transfer is completed but execution of a payment order by the receiving bank in breach of the provisions of section 28-4-622 results in delay in payment to the beneficiary, the bank is obliged to pay interest to either the originator or the beneficiary of the funds transfer for the period of delay caused by the improper execution. Except as provided in subsection (3) of this section, additional damages are not recoverable.
(2) If execution of a payment order by a receiving bank in breach of section 28-4-622 results in:
(a) noncompletion of the funds transfer,
(b) failure to use an intermediary bank designated by the originator, or
(c) issuance of a payment order that does not comply with the terms of the payment order of the originator, the bank is liable to the originator for its expenses in the funds transfer and for incidental expenses and interest losses, to the extent not covered in subsection (1) of this section, resulting from the improper execution.
Except as provided in subsection (3) of this section, additional damages are not recoverable.
(3) In addition to the amounts payable under subsections (1) and (2) of this section, damages, including consequential damages, are recoverable to the extent provided in an express written agreement of the receiving bank.
(4) If a receiving bank fails to execute a payment order it was obliged by express agreement to execute, the receiving bank is liable to the sender for its expenses in the transaction and for incidental expenses and interest losses resulting from the failure to execute. Additional damages, including consequential damages, are recoverable to the extent provided in an express written agreement of the receiving bank, but are not otherwise recoverable.
(5) Reasonable attorney’s fees are recoverable if demand for compensation under subsection (1) or (2) of this section is made and refused before an action is brought on the claim. If a claim is made for breach of an agreement under subsection (4) of this section, and the agreement does not provide for damages, reasonable attorney’s fees are recoverable if demand for compensation under subsection (4) of this section, is made and refused before an action is brought on the claim.
(6) Except as stated in this section, the liability of a receiving bank under subsections (1) and (2) of this section, may not be varied by agreement.
History:
[28-4-625, added 1991, ch. 135, sec. 1, p. 309.]
2023 Idaho Code › Title 28 - COMMERCIAL TRANSACTIONS › Chapter 4 - UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE — BANK DEPOSITS AND COLLECTIONS › Part 6 - FUNDS TRANSFERS › Section 28-4-626 - PAYMENT DATE.

28-4-626. PAYMENT DATE. "Payment date" of a payment order means the day on which the amount of the order is payable to the beneficiary by the beneficiary’s bank. The payment date may be determined by instruction of the sender but cannot be earlier than the day the order is received by the beneficiary’s bank and, unless otherwise determined, is the day the order is received by the beneficiary’s bank.
History:
[28-4-626, added 1991, ch. 135, sec. 1, p. 310.]
2023 Idaho Code › Title 28 - COMMERCIAL TRANSACTIONS › Chapter 4 - UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE — BANK DEPOSITS AND COLLECTIONS › Part 6 - FUNDS TRANSFERS › Section 28-4-627 - OBLIGATION OF SENDER TO PAY RECEIVING BANK.

28-4-627. OBLIGATION OF SENDER TO PAY RECEIVING BANK. (1) The provisions of this section are subject to the provisions of sections 28-4-613 and 28-4-615.
(2) With respect to a payment order issued to the beneficiary’s bank, acceptance of the order by the bank obliges the sender to pay the bank the amount of the order, but payment is not due until the payment date of the order.
(3) The provisions of this subsection are subject to the provisions of subsection (5) of this section and to section 28-4-623. With respect to a payment order issued to a receiving bank other than the beneficiary’s bank, acceptance of the order by the receiving bank obliges the sender to pay the bank the amount of the sender’s order. Payment by the sender is not due until the execution date of the sender’s order. The obligation of that sender to pay its payment order is excused if the funds transfer is not completed by acceptance by the beneficiary’s bank of a payment order instructing payment to the beneficiary of that sender’s payment order.
(4) If the sender of a payment order pays the order and was not obliged to pay all or part of the amount paid, the bank receiving payment is obliged to refund payment to the extent the sender was not obliged to pay. Except as provided in sections 28-4-612 and 28-4-624, interest is payable on the refundable amount from the date of payment.
(5) If a funds transfer is not completed as stated in subsection (3) of this section and an intermediary bank is obliged to refund payment as stated in subsection (4) of this section but is unable to do so because it is not permitted by applicable law or because the bank suspends payments, a sender in the funds transfer that executed a payment order in compliance with an instruction, as stated in section 28-4-622(1)(a), to route the funds transfer through that intermediary bank is entitled to receive or retain payment from the sender of the payment order that it accepted. The first sender in the funds transfer that issued an instruction requiring routing through that intermediary bank is subrogated to the right of the bank that paid the intermediary bank to refund as stated in subsection (4) of this section.
(6) The right of the sender of a payment order to be excused from the obligation to pay the order as stated in subsection (3) of this section or to receive refund under subsection (4) may not be varied by agreement.
History:
[28-4-627, added 1991, ch. 135, sec. 1, p. 310.]
2023 Idaho Code › Title 28 - COMMERCIAL TRANSACTIONS › Chapter 4 - UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE — BANK DEPOSITS AND COLLECTIONS › Part 6 - FUNDS TRANSFERS › Section 28-4-628 - PAYMENT BY SENDER TO RECEIVING BANK.

28-4-628. PAYMENT BY SENDER TO RECEIVING BANK. (1) Payment of the sender’s obligation under section 28-4-627 to pay the receiving bank occurs as follows:
(a) If the sender is a bank, payment occurs when the receiving bank receives final settlement of the obligation through a Federal Reserve bank or through a funds-transfer system.
(b) If the sender is a bank and the sender (i) credited an account of the receiving bank with the sender, or (ii) caused an account of the receiving bank in another bank to be credited, payment occurs when the credit is withdrawn or, if not withdrawn, at midnight of the day on which the credit is withdrawable and the receiving bank learns of that fact.
(c) If the receiving bank debits an account of the sender with the receiving bank, payment occurs when the debit is made to the extent the debit is covered by a withdrawable credit balance in the account.
(2) If the sender and receiving bank are members of a funds-transfer system that nets obligations multilaterally among participants, the receiving bank receives final settlement when settlement is complete in accordance with the rules of the system. The obligation of the sender to pay the amount of a payment order transmitted through the funds-transfer system may be satisfied, to the extent permitted by the rules of the system, by setting off and applying against the sender’s obligation the right of the sender to receive payment from the receiving bank of the amount of any other payment order transmitted to the sender by the receiving bank through the funds-transfer system. The aggregate balance of obligations owed by each sender to each receiving bank in the funds-transfer system may be satisfied, to the extent permitted by the rules of the system, by setting off and applying against that balance the aggregate balance of obligations owed to the sender by other members of the system. The aggregate balance is determined after the right of setoff stated in the second sentence of this subsection has been exercised.
(3) If two (2) banks transmit payment orders to each other under an agreement that settlement of the obligations of each bank to the other under section 28-4-627 will be made at the end of the day or other period, the total amount owed with respect to all orders transmitted by one (1) bank shall be set off against the total amount owed with respect to all orders transmitted by the other bank. To the extent of the setoff, each bank has made payment to the other.
(4) In a case not covered by subsection (1) of this section, the time when payment of the sender’s obligation under section 28-4-627(2) or (3) occurs is governed by applicable principles of law that determine when an obligation is satisfied.
History:
[28-4-628, added 1991, ch. 135, sec. 1, p. 311.]
2023 Idaho Code › Title 28 - COMMERCIAL TRANSACTIONS › Chapter 4 - UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE — BANK DEPOSITS AND COLLECTIONS › Part 6 - FUNDS TRANSFERS › Section 28-4-629 - OBLIGATION OF BENEFICIARY’S BANK TO PAY AND GIVE NOTICE TO BENEFICIARY.

28-4-629. OBLIGATION OF BENEFICIARY’S BANK TO PAY AND GIVE NOTICE TO BENEFICIARY. (1) Subject to sections 28-4-619(5), 28-4-630(4) and (5), if a beneficiary’s bank accepts a payment order, the bank is obliged to pay the amount of the order to the beneficiary of the order. Payment is due on the payment date of the order, but if acceptance occurs on the payment date after the close of the funds-transfer business day of the bank, payment is due on the next funds-transfer business day. If the bank refuses to pay after demand by the beneficiary and receipt of notice of particular circumstances that will give rise to consequential damages as a result of nonpayment, the beneficiary may recover damages resulting from the refusal to pay to the extent the bank had notice of the damages, unless the bank proves that it did not pay because of a reasonable doubt concerning the right of the beneficiary to payment.
(2) If a payment order accepted by the beneficiary’s bank instructs payment to an account of the beneficiary, the bank is obliged to notify the beneficiary of receipt of the order before midnight of the next funds-transfer business day following the payment date. If the payment order does not instruct payment to an account of the beneficiary, the bank is required to notify the beneficiary only if notice is required by the order. Notice may be given by first class mail or any other means reasonable in the circumstances. If the bank fails to give the required notice, the bank is obliged to pay interest to the beneficiary on the amount of the payment order from the day notice should have been given until the day the beneficiary learned of receipt of the payment order by the bank. No other damages are recoverable. Reasonable attorney’s fees are also recoverable if demand for interest is made and refused before an action is brought on the claim.
(3) The right of a beneficiary to receive payment and damages as stated in subsection (1) of this section may not be varied by agreement or a funds-transfer system rule. The right of a beneficiary to be notified as stated in subsection (2) of this section may be varied by agreement of the beneficiary or by a funds-transfer system rule if the beneficiary is notified of the rule before initiation of the funds transfer.
History:
[28-4-629, added 1991, ch. 135, sec. 1, p. 312.]
2023 Idaho Code › Title 28 - COMMERCIAL TRANSACTIONS › Chapter 4 - UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE — BANK DEPOSITS AND COLLECTIONS › Part 6 - FUNDS TRANSFERS › Section 28-4-631 - PAYMENT BY ORIGINATOR TO BENEFICIARY — DISCHARGE OF UNDERLYING OBLIGATION.

28-4-631. PAYMENT BY ORIGINATOR TO BENEFICIARY — DISCHARGE OF UNDERLYING OBLIGATION. (1) Subject to the provisions of sections 28-4-619(5), 28-4-630(4) and (5), the originator of a funds transfer pays the beneficiary of the originator’s payment order:
(a) at the time a payment order for the benefit of the beneficiary is accepted by the beneficiary’s bank in the funds transfer, and
(b) in an amount equal to the amount of the order accepted by the beneficiary’s bank, but not more than the amount of the originator’s order.
(2) If payment under subsection (1) of this section is made to satisfy an obligation, the obligation is discharged to the same extent discharge would result from payment to the beneficiary of the same amount in money, unless:
(a) the payment under subsection (1) of this section was made by a means prohibited by the contract of the beneficiary with respect to the obligation,
(b) the beneficiary, within a reasonable time after receiving notice of receipt of the order by the beneficiary’s bank, notified the originator of the beneficiary’s refusal of the payment,
(c) funds with respect to the order were not withdrawn by the beneficiary or applied to a debt of the beneficiary, and
(d) the beneficiary would suffer a loss that could reasonably have been avoided if payment had been made by a means complying with the contract.
If payment by the originator does not result in discharge under this section, the originator is subrogated to the rights of the beneficiary to receive payment from the beneficiary’s bank under section 28-4-629(1).
(3) For the purpose of determining whether discharge of an obligation occurs under subsection (2) of this section, if the beneficiary’s bank accepts a payment order in an amount equal to the amount of the originator’s payment order less charges of one (1) or more receiving banks in the funds transfer, payment to the beneficiary is deemed to be in the amount of the originator’s order unless upon demand by the beneficiary the originator does not pay the beneficiary the amount of the deducted charges.
(4) Rights of the originator or of the beneficiary of a funds transfer under this section may be varied only by agreement of the originator and the beneficiary.
History:
[28-4-631, added 1991, ch. 135, sec. 1, p. 314.]
2023 Idaho Code › Title 28 - COMMERCIAL TRANSACTIONS › Chapter 4 - UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE — BANK DEPOSITS AND COLLECTIONS › Part 6 - FUNDS TRANSFERS › Section 28-4-632 - VARIATION BY AGREEMENT AND EFFECT OF FUNDS-TRANSFER SYSTEM RULE.

28-4-632. VARIATION BY AGREEMENT AND EFFECT OF FUNDS-TRANSFER SYSTEM RULE. (1) Except as otherwise provided in this part, the rights and obligations of a party to a funds transfer may be varied by agreement of the affected party.
(2) "Funds-transfer system rule" means a rule of an association of banks:
(a) governing transmission of payment orders by means of a funds-transfer system of the association or rights and obligations with respect to those orders, or
(b) to the extent the rule governs rights and obligations between banks that are parties to a funds transfer in which a Federal Reserve bank, acting as an intermediary bank, sends a payment order to the beneficiary’s bank.
Except as otherwise provided in this part, a funds-transfer system rule governing rights and obligations between participating banks using the system may be effective even if the rule conflicts with this part and indirectly affects another party to the funds transfer who does not consent to the rule. A funds-transfer system rule may also govern rights and obligations of parties other than participating banks using the system to the extent stated in sections 28-4-629(3), 28-4-630(4), and 28-4-638(3).
History:
[28-4-632, added 1991, ch. 135, sec. 1, p. 315.]
2023 Idaho Code › Title 28 - COMMERCIAL TRANSACTIONS › Chapter 4 - UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE — BANK DEPOSITS AND COLLECTIONS › Part 6 - FUNDS TRANSFERS › Section 28-4-633 - CREDITOR PROCESS SERVED ON RECEIVING BANK — SETOFF BY BENEFICIARY’S BANK.

28-4-633. CREDITOR PROCESS SERVED ON RECEIVING BANK — SETOFF BY BENEFICIARY’S BANK. (1) As used in this section, "creditor process" means levy, attachment, garnishment, notice of lien, sequestration, or similar process issued by or on behalf of a creditor or other claimant with respect to an account.
(2) The provisions of this subsection apply to creditor process with respect to an authorized account of the sender of a payment order if the creditor process is served on the receiving bank. For the purpose of determining rights with respect to the creditor process, if the receiving bank accepts the payment order the balance in the authorized account is deemed to be reduced by the amount of the payment order to the extent the bank did not otherwise receive payment of the order, unless the creditor process is served at a time and in a manner affording the bank a reasonable opportunity to act on it before the bank accepts the payment order.
(3) If a beneficiary’s bank has received a payment order for payment to the beneficiary’s account in the bank, the following rules apply:
(a) The bank may credit the beneficiary’s account. The amount credited may be set off against an obligation owed by the beneficiary to the bank or may be applied to satisfy creditor process served on the bank with respect to the account.
(b) The bank may credit the beneficiary’s account and allow withdrawal of the amount credited unless creditor process with respect to the account is served at a time and in a manner affording the bank a reasonable opportunity to act to prevent withdrawal.
(c) If creditor process with respect to the beneficiary’s account has been served and the bank has had a reasonable opportunity to act on it, the bank may not reject the payment order except for a reason unrelated to the service of process.
(4) Creditor process with respect to a payment by the originator to the beneficiary pursuant to a funds transfer may be served only on the beneficiary’s bank with respect to the debt owed by that bank to the beneficiary. Any other bank served with the creditor process is not obliged to act with respect to the process.
History:
[28-4-633, added 1991, ch. 135, sec. 1, p. 315.]
2023 Idaho Code › Title 28 - COMMERCIAL TRANSACTIONS › Chapter 4 - UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE — BANK DEPOSITS AND COLLECTIONS › Part 6 - FUNDS TRANSFERS › Section 28-4-634 - INJUNCTION OR RESTRAINING ORDER WITH RESPECT TO FUNDS TRANSFER.

28-4-634. INJUNCTION OR RESTRAINING ORDER WITH RESPECT TO FUNDS TRANSFER. For proper cause and in compliance with applicable law, a court may restrain:
(1) A person from issuing a payment order to initiate a funds transfer,
(2) An originator’s bank from executing the payment order of the originator, or
(3) The beneficiary’s bank from releasing funds to the beneficiary or the beneficiary from withdrawing the funds.
A court may not otherwise restrain a person from issuing a payment order, paying or receiving payment of a payment order, or otherwise acting with respect to a funds transfer.
History:
[28-4-634, added 1991, ch. 135, sec. 1, p. 316.]
2023 Idaho Code › Title 28 - COMMERCIAL TRANSACTIONS › Chapter 4 - UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE — BANK DEPOSITS AND COLLECTIONS › Part 6 - FUNDS TRANSFERS › Section 28-4-635 - ORDER IN WHICH ITEMS AND PAYMENT ORDERS MAY BE CHARGED TO ACCOUNT — ORDER OF WITHDRAWALS FROM ACCOUNT.

28-4-635. ORDER IN WHICH ITEMS AND PAYMENT ORDERS MAY BE CHARGED TO ACCOUNT — ORDER OF WITHDRAWALS FROM ACCOUNT. (1) If a receiving bank has received more than one (1) payment order of the sender or one (1) or more payment orders and other items that are payable from the sender’s account, the bank may charge the sender’s account with respect to the various orders and items in any sequence.
(2) In determining whether a credit to an account has been withdrawn by the holder of the account or applied to a debt of the holder of the account, credits first made to the account are first withdrawn or applied.
History:
[28-4-635, added 1991, ch. 135, sec. 1, p. 316.]
2023 Idaho Code › Title 28 - COMMERCIAL TRANSACTIONS › Chapter 4 - UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE — BANK DEPOSITS AND COLLECTIONS › Part 6 - FUNDS TRANSFERS › Section 28-4-636 - PRECLUSION OF OBJECTION TO DEBIT OF CUSTOMER’S ACCOUNT.

28-4-636. PRECLUSION OF OBJECTION TO DEBIT OF CUSTOMER’S ACCOUNT. If a receiving bank has received payment from its customer with respect to a payment order issued in the name of the customer as sender and accepted by the bank, and the customer received notification reasonably identifying the order, the customer is precluded from asserting that the bank is not entitled to retain the payment unless the customer notifies the bank of the customer’s objection to the payment within one (1) year after the notification was received by the customer.
History:
[28-4-636, added 1991, ch. 135, sec. 1, p. 316.]
2023 Idaho Code › Title 28 - COMMERCIAL TRANSACTIONS › Chapter 4 - UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE — BANK DEPOSITS AND COLLECTIONS › Part 6 - FUNDS TRANSFERS › Section 28-4-637 - RATE OF INTEREST.

28-4-637. RATE OF INTEREST. (1) If, under this part, a receiving bank is obliged to pay interest with respect to a payment order issued to the bank, the amount payable may be determined:
(a) by agreement of the sender and receiving bank, or
(b) by a funds-transfer system rule if the payment order is transmitted through a funds-transfer system.
(2) If the amount of interest is not determined by an agreement or rule as stated in subsection (1) of this section, the amount is calculated by multiplying the applicable federal funds rate by the amount on which interest is payable, and then multiplying the product by the number of days for which interest is payable. The applicable federal funds rate is the average of the federal funds rates published by the Federal Reserve bank of New York for each of the days for which interest is payable divided by three hundred and sixty (360). The federal funds rate for any day on which a published rate is not available is the same as the published rate for the next preceding day for which there is a published rate. If a receiving bank that accepted a payment order is required to refund payment to the sender of the order because the funds transfer was not completed, but the failure to complete was not due to any fault by the bank, the interest payable is reduced by a percentage equal to the reserve requirement on deposits of the receiving bank.
History:
[28-4-637, added 1991, ch. 135, sec. 1, p. 316.]
2023 Idaho Code › Title 28 - COMMERCIAL TRANSACTIONS › Chapter 4 - UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE — BANK DEPOSITS AND COLLECTIONS › Part 6 - FUNDS TRANSFERS › Section 28-4-638 - CHOICE OF LAW.

28-4-638. CHOICE OF LAW. (1) The following rules apply unless the affected parties otherwise agree or the provisions of subsection (3) of this section apply:
(a) The rights and obligations between the sender of a payment order and the receiving bank are governed by the law of the jurisdiction in which the receiving bank is located.
(b) The rights and obligations between the beneficiary’s bank and the beneficiary are governed by the law of the jurisdiction in which the beneficiary’s bank is located.
(c) The issue of when payment is made pursuant to a funds transfer by the originator to the beneficiary is governed by the law of the jurisdiction in which the beneficiary’s bank is located.
(2) If the parties described in paragraphs (a), (b) and (c) of subsection (1) of this section have made an agreement selecting the law of a particular jurisdiction to govern rights and obligations between each other, the law of that jurisdiction governs those rights and obligations, whether or not the payment order or the funds transfer bears a reasonable relation to that jurisdiction.
(3) A funds-transfer system rule may select the law of a particular jurisdiction to govern:
(a) rights and obligations between participating banks with respect to payment orders transmitted or processed through the system, or
(b) the rights and obligations of some or all parties to a funds transfer any part of which is carried out by means of the system.
A choice of law made pursuant to paragraph (a) of this subsection is binding on participating banks. A choice of law made pursuant to paragraph (b) of this subsection is binding on the originator, other sender, or a receiving bank having notice that the funds-transfer system might be used in the funds transfer and of the choice of law by the system when the originator, other sender, or receiving bank issued or accepted a payment order. The beneficiary of a funds transfer is bound by the choice of law if, when the funds transfer is initiated, the beneficiary has notice that the funds-transfer system might be used in the funds transfer and of the choice of law by the system. The law of a jurisdiction selected pursuant to this subsection may govern, whether or not that law bears a reasonable relation to the matter in issue.
(4) In the event of inconsistency between an agreement under subsection (2) of this section and a choice-of-law rule under subsection (3) of this section, the agreement under subsection (2) of this section prevails.
(5) If a funds transfer is made by use of more than one (1) funds-transfer system and there is inconsistency between choice-of-law rules of the systems, the matter in issue is governed by the law of the selected jurisdiction that has the most significant relationship to the matter in issue.
History:
[28-4-638, added 1991, ch. 135, sec. 1, p. 317.]
2023 Idaho Code › Title 28 - COMMERCIAL TRANSACTIONS › Chapter 5 - UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE — LETTERS OF CREDIT › Section 28-5-101 - SHORT TITLE.

28-5-101. SHORT TITLE. This chapter may be cited as "Uniform Commercial Code — Letters of Credit."
History:
[28-5-101, added 1996, ch. 7, sec. 2, p. 9.]
2023 Idaho Code › Title 28 - COMMERCIAL TRANSACTIONS › Chapter 5 - UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE — LETTERS OF CREDIT › Section 28-5-103 - SCOPE.

28-5-103. SCOPE. (1) This chapter applies to letters of credit and to certain rights and obligations arising out of transactions involving letters of credit.
(2) The statement of a rule in this chapter does not by itself require, imply, or negate application of the same or a different rule to a situation not provided for, or to a person not specified, in this chapter.
(3) With the exception of this subsection, subsections (1) and (2), sections 28-5-102(1)(i) and (1)(j), 28-5-106(4) and 28-5-114(4), and except to the extent prohibited in sections 28-1-302 and 28-5-117(4), the effect of this chapter may be varied by agreement or by a provision stated or incorporated by reference in an undertaking. A term in an agreement or undertaking generally excusing liability or generally limiting remedies for failure to perform obligations is not sufficient to vary obligations prescribed by this chapter.
(4) Rights and obligations of an issuer to a beneficiary or a nominated person under a letter of credit are independent of the existence, performance, or nonperformance of a contract or arrangement out of which the letter of credit arises or which underlies it, including contracts or arrangements between the issuer and the applicant and between the applicant and the beneficiary.
History:
[28-5-103, added 1996, ch. 7, sec. 2, p. 11; am. 2004, ch. 43, sec. 35, p. 156.]
2023 Idaho Code › Title 28 - COMMERCIAL TRANSACTIONS › Chapter 5 - UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE — LETTERS OF CREDIT › Section 28-5-104 - FORMAL REQUIREMENTS.

28-5-104. FORMAL REQUIREMENTS. A letter of credit, confirmation, advice, transfer, amendment, or cancellation may be issued in any form that is a record and is authenticated (i) by a signature or (ii) in accordance with the agreement of the parties or the standard practice referred to in section 28-5-108(5).
History:
[28-5-104, added 1996, ch. 7, sec. 2, p. 11.]
2023 Idaho Code › Title 28 - COMMERCIAL TRANSACTIONS › Chapter 5 - UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE — LETTERS OF CREDIT › Section 28-5-105 - CONSIDERATION.

28-5-105. CONSIDERATION. Consideration is not required to issue, amend, transfer, or cancel a letter of credit, advice, or confirmation.
History:
[28-5-105, added 1996, ch. 7, sec. 2, p. 11.]
2023 Idaho Code › Title 28 - COMMERCIAL TRANSACTIONS › Chapter 5 - UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE — LETTERS OF CREDIT › Section 28-5-106 - ISSUANCE, AMENDMENT, CANCELLATION, AND DURATION.

28-5-106. ISSUANCE, AMENDMENT, CANCELLATION, AND DURATION. (1) A letter of credit is issued and becomes enforceable according to its terms against the issuer when the issuer sends or otherwise transmits it to the person requested to advise or to the beneficiary. A letter of credit is revocable only if it so provides.
(2) After a letter of credit is issued, rights and obligations of a beneficiary, applicant, confirmer, and issuer are not affected by an amendment or cancellation to which that person has not consented except to the extent the letter of credit provides that it is revocable or that the issuer may amend or cancel the letter of credit without that consent.
(3) If there is no stated expiration date or other provision that determines its duration, a letter of credit expires one (1) year after its stated date of issuance or, if none is stated, after the date on which it is issued.
(4) A letter of credit that states that it is perpetual expires five (5) years after its stated date of issuance, or if none is stated, after the date on which it is issued.
History:
[28-5-106, added 1996, ch. 7, sec. 2, p. 12.]
2023 Idaho Code › Title 28 - COMMERCIAL TRANSACTIONS › Chapter 5 - UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE — LETTERS OF CREDIT › Section 28-5-107 - CONFIRMER, NOMINATED PERSON, AND ADVISER.

28-5-107. CONFIRMER, NOMINATED PERSON, AND ADVISER. (1) A confirmer is directly obligated on a letter of credit and has the rights and obligations of an issuer to the extent of its confirmation. The confirmer also has rights against and obligations to the issuer as if the issuer were an applicant and the confirmer had issued the letter of credit at the request and for the account of the issuer.
(2) A nominated person who is not a confirmer is not obligated to honor or otherwise give value for a presentation.
(3) A person requested to advise may decline to act as an adviser. An adviser that is not a confirmer is not obligated to honor or give value for a presentation. An adviser undertakes to the issuer and to the beneficiary accurately to advise the terms of the letter of credit, confirmation, amendment, or advice received by that person and undertakes to the beneficiary to check the apparent authenticity of the request to advise. Even if the advice is inaccurate, the letter of credit, confirmation, or amendment is enforceable as issued.
(4) A person who notifies a transferee beneficiary of the terms of a letter of credit, confirmation, amendment, or advice has the rights and obligations of an adviser under subsection (3) of this section. The terms in the notice to the transferee beneficiary may differ from the terms in any notice to the transferor beneficiary to the extent permitted by the letter of credit, confirmation, amendment, or advice received by the person who so notifies.
History:
[28-5-107, added 1996, ch. 7, sec. 2, p. 12.]
2023 Idaho Code › Title 28 - COMMERCIAL TRANSACTIONS › Chapter 5 - UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE — LETTERS OF CREDIT › Section 28-5-109 - FRAUD AND FORGERY.

28-5-109. FRAUD AND FORGERY. (1) If a presentation is made that appears on its face strictly to comply with the terms and conditions of the letter of credit, but a required document is forged or materially fraudulent, or honor of the presentation would facilitate a material fraud by the beneficiary on the issuer or applicant:
(a) the issuer shall honor the presentation, if honor is demanded by (i) a nominated person who has given value in good faith and without notice of forgery or material fraud, (ii) a confirmer who has honored its confirmation in good faith, (iii) a holder in due course of a draft drawn under the letter of credit which was taken after acceptance by the issuer or nominated person, or (iv) an assignee of the issuer’s or nominated person’s deferred obligation that was taken for value and without notice of forgery or material fraud after the obligation was incurred by the issuer or nominated person, and
(b) the issuer, acting in good faith, may honor or dishonor the presentation in any other case.
(2) If an applicant claims that a required document is forged or materially fraudulent or that honor of the presentation would facilitate a material fraud by the beneficiary on the issuer or applicant, a court of competent jurisdiction may temporarily or permanently enjoin the issuer from honoring a presentation or grant similar relief against the issuer or other persons only if the court finds that:
(a) the relief is not prohibited under the law applicable to an accepted draft or deferred obligation incurred by the issuer,
(b) a beneficiary, issuer, or nominated person who may be adversely affected is adequately protected against loss that it may suffer because the relief is granted,
(c) all of the conditions to entitle a person to the relief under Idaho law have been met, and
(d) on the basis of the information submitted to the court, the applicant is more likely than not to succeed under its claim of forgery or material fraud and the person demanding honor does not qualify for protection under subsection (1)(a) of this section.
History:
[28-5-109, added 1996, ch. 7, sec. 2, p. 14.]
2023 Idaho Code › Title 28 - COMMERCIAL TRANSACTIONS › Chapter 5 - UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE — LETTERS OF CREDIT › Section 28-5-110 - WARRANTIES.

28-5-110. WARRANTIES. (1) If its presentation is honored, the beneficiary warrants:
(a) to the issuer, any other person to whom presentation is made, and the applicant that there is no fraud or forgery of the kind described in section 28-5-109(1); and
(b) to the applicant that the drawing does not violate any agreement between the applicant and beneficiary or any other agreement intended by them to be augmented by the letter of credit.
(2) The warranties in subsection (1) of this section are in addition to warranties arising under chapters 3, 4, 7 and 8, title 28, Idaho Code, because of the presentation or transfer of documents covered by any of those chapters.
History:
[28-5-110, added 1996, ch. 7, sec. 2, p. 14.]
2023 Idaho Code › Title 28 - COMMERCIAL TRANSACTIONS › Chapter 5 - UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE — LETTERS OF CREDIT › Section 28-5-111 - REMEDIES.

28-5-111. REMEDIES. (1) If an issuer wrongfully dishonors or repudiates its obligation to pay money under a letter of credit before presentation, the beneficiary, successor, or nominated person presenting on its own behalf may recover from the issuer the amount that is the subject of the dishonor or repudiation. If the issuer’s obligation under the letter of credit is not for the payment of money, the claimant may obtain specific performance or, at the claimant’s election, recover an amount equal to the value of performance from the issuer. In either case, the claimant may also recover incidental but not consequential damages. The claimant is not obligated to take action to avoid damages that might be due from the issuer under this subsection. If, although not obligated to do so, the claimant avoids damages, the claimant’s recovery from the issuer must be reduced by the amount of damages avoided. The issuer has the burden of proving the amount of damages avoided. In the case of repudiation the claimant need not present any document.
(2) If an issuer wrongfully dishonors a draft or demand presented under a letter of credit or honors a draft or demand in breach of its obligation to the applicant, the applicant may recover damages resulting from the breach, including incidental but not consequential damages, less any amount saved as a result of the breach.
(3) If an adviser or nominated person other than a confirmer breaches an obligation under this article or an issuer breaches an obligation not covered in subsection (1) or (2) of this section, a person to whom the obligation is owed may recover damages resulting from the breach, including incidental but not consequential damages, less any amount saved as a result of the breach. To the extent of the confirmation, a confirmer has the liability of an issuer specified in this subsection and subsections (1) and (2) of this section.
(4) An issuer, nominated person, or adviser who is found liable under subsection (1), (2) or (3) of this section shall pay interest on the amount owed thereunder from the date of wrongful dishonor or other appropriate date.
(5) Reasonable attorney’s fees and other expenses of litigation must be awarded to the prevailing party in an action in which a remedy is sought under this chapter.
(6) Damages that would otherwise be payable by a party for breach of an obligation under this article may be liquidated by agreement or undertaking, but only in an amount or by a formula that is reasonable in light of the harm anticipated.
History:
[28-5-111, added 1996, ch. 7, sec. 2, p. 14.]