2023 Colorado Revised Statutes › Title 13 - COURTS AND COURT PROCEDURE (§§ 13-1-101 — 13-100-104) › COURTS OF RECORD (§§ 13-1-101 — 13-9-124) › Article 5.5 - COMMISSIONS ON JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE (§§ 13-5.5-101 — 13-5.5-116) › Section 13-5.5-105 - [Effective 8/7/2024] Powers and duties of the state and district commissions - rules

(1)
In addition to any other powers conferred or duties assigned upon the separate commissions by this article 5.5, all commissions have the following powers and duties:
(a)
To review any available case management data and statistics provided by the state court administrator, the state commission, and district commissions related to individual justices and judges. A district commission may ask the state court administrator to provide supplemental information and assistance in assessing a judge's overall case management.
(b)
To review written judicial opinions and orders authorized by justices and judges under the commission's oversight;
(c)
To collect information from courtroom observation by commissioners of justices and judges, as well as information provided to the commissions by the volunteer courtroom observer program;
(d)
To interview justices and judges under the commission's oversight and to accept information and documentation from interested persons as necessary, including judicial performance surveys;
(e)
To make recommendations and prepare narratives that reflect the results of performance evaluations of justices and judges; and
(f)
At an individual commission's discretion after it completes an interim evaluation of a justice or judge pursuant to section
13-5.5-109
, to recommend that the chief justice or appropriate chief judge develop an individual judicial improvement plan pursuant to section
13-5.5-110
.
(2)
In addition to other powers conferred and duties imposed upon the state commission by this article 5.5 and section
13-5.5-106
, the state commission has the following powers and duties:
(a)
To appoint and supervise the executive director of the office on judicial performance evaluation;
(b)
To assist the executive director in managing the office and providing fiscal oversight of the office's operating budget;
(c)
To review data, prepare narratives, and make recommendations related to individual supreme court justices and judges of the court of appeals in accordance with sections
13-5.5-108
and
13-5.5-109
;
(d)
(I)
To develop surveys to evaluate the performance of justices and judges, which surveys are completed by individuals who interact with the court, including but not limited to attorneys, jurors, represented and unrepresented litigants; law enforcement personnel; attorneys within the district attorneys' and public defenders' offices, employees of the court, court interpreters, employees of probation offices, and employees of county departments of human or social services; and victims of crimes, as defined in section
24-4.1-302 (5)
;
(I.5)
The surveys developed pursuant to subsection (2)(d)(I) of this section are to be distributed primarily through electronic means, and the state commission shall make efforts to locate electronic mail addresses for the parties identified in said subsection.
(II)
To develop rules, guidelines, and procedures to make the results of surveys developed pursuant to this subsection (2)(d) readily available to all parties set forth in subsection (2)(d)(I) of this section;
(III)
To develop rules, guidelines, and procedures to provide interested parties with accessible and timely opportunities to review the surveys developed pursuant to this subsection (2)(d); and
(IV)
To develop rules, guidelines, and procedures to make the surveys developed pursuant to this subsection (2)(d) and any available survey reports available to the public;
(e)
To determine the validity of completed surveys developed pursuant to this subsection (2), report to the district commissions on the validity of the surveys for their districts, and prepare alternatives to surveys where sample populations are inadequate to produce valid results;
(f)
To produce and distribute survey reports and public narratives that reflect the results of each judicial performance evaluation;
(g)
To develop rules, guidelines, and procedures for the review of the deliberation procedures established by the district commissions; except that the state commission does not have the power or duty to review actual determinations made by a district commission;
(h)
To promulgate rules pursuant to section
13-5.5-106
concerning:
(I)
The evaluation of justices and judges based on performance evaluation criteria set forth in section
13-5.5-107
;
(II)
The creation of a standards matrix or scorecard related to the performance evaluation criteria set forth in section
13-5.5-107
; and
(III)
The continuous collection of data for use in the evaluation process, including surveys developed pursuant to subsection (2)(d) of this section;
(i)
To develop rules, guidelines, and procedures concerning a systemwide judicial training program and a systemwide volunteer courtroom observer program; and
(j)
To prepare a report pursuant to section
13-5.5-114
.
(3)
In addition to other powers conferred and duties imposed upon a district commission by this article 5.5, in conformity with the rules, guidelines, and procedures adopted by the state commission pursuant to section
13-5.5-106
and the state commission's review of the deliberation procedures pursuant to subsection (2) of this section, each district commission has the following powers and duties:
(a)
To obtain information from parties and attorneys regarding judges' handling of cases with respect to the judges' fairness, patience with pro se parties, gender neutrality, racial disparity, and handling of emotional parties;
(b)
To review data, prepare narratives, and make evaluations related to judges pursuant to the provisions of sections
13-5.5-108
and
13-5.5-109
; and
(c)
Upon completing the required recommendations and narratives pursuant to subsection (1) of this section, to collect all documents and other information, including all surveys and copies, received regarding each judge who was evaluated and forward such documents and information to the state commission within thirty days.
(4)
Unless recused pursuant to a provision of this article 5.5, each commissioner of the state and district commissions has the discretion to evaluate the performance of a justice or judge under the commission's oversight and vote as to whether the justice or judge meets the performance standard based upon the commissioner's review of all of the information available to the commission.
Amended by 2024 Ch. 155,§ 1, eff. 8/7/2024.
Amended by 2019 Ch. 374, §4, eff. 5/30/2019.
Entire article repealed and reenacted with amendments by 2017 Ch. 331, §1, eff. 8/9/2017.
L. 2017: Entire article R&RE, (HB 17-1303), ch. 331, p. 1770, § 1, effective August 9.
This section is similar to former §§ 13-5.5-103 and 13-5.5-105 as they existed prior to 2017.
2024 Ch. 155, was passed without a safety clause. See Colo. Const. art. V, § 1(3).
This section is set out more than once due to postponed, multiple, or conflicting amendments.