2023 Alaska Statutes › Title 44. State Government › Chapter 66. Review of the Activities of Agencies, Boards, and Commissions › Sec. 44.66.040. Duties of the review team [See delayed repeal note].

(a) During a review year set out in AS 44.66.020(a), the legislative audit division shall determine the scope of the performance review subject to approval by the Legislative Budget and Audit Committee, and the review team shall
(1) collaborate with the legislative audit division and the legislative finance division to identify any earlier audit findings or budgetary issues for the agency;
(2) through the Legislative Budget and Audit committee or the senate or house finance committees of the state legislature, schedule public hearings in Juneau, Anchorage, Fairbanks, and other locations as determined by the committees to review agency activities and identify problems or concerns;
(3) consult with other states and appropriate public policy organizations to establish best practices for the agency;
(4) analyze the agency priorities reported to the legislature under AS 37.07.050(a)(13); and
(5) evaluate the agency process for development of capital projects.
(b) The review team shall analyze materials relevant to the performance of the agency, including
(1) all material provided under AS 44.66.020(c)(4);
(2) a 10-year growth history and a 10-year projection of agency expenses by funding source, prepared by the office of management and budget;
(3) organizational charts, personnel charts by location that show the number of positions and the functions of each position, and a list of transfers of personal services funding to or from other line items within the agency during the preceding 10 years, prepared by the office of management and budget;
(4) audit information, including a list of agency audit recommendations, prepared by the legislative audit division;
(5) a list of any financial issues relating to the agency's operating or capital expenditures, prepared by the legislative finance division;
(6) an explanation of the function and procedure for dedicated funds or any other special funds in the agency, prepared by the legislative finance division;
(7) a 10-year history of any budget ratifications or supplemental budget requests, prepared by the legislative finance division; and
(8) analysis and summary of confidential information that the review team may request, through the Legislative Budget and Audit Committee, from the legislative audit division, if necessary to complete the team's review.
(c) Before December 16 of the review year set out in AS 44.66.020(a), the review team shall provide a confidential preliminary report to the Legislative Budget and Audit Committee.
(d) One week before the first day of the regular session of the legislature in the year following the review year set out in AS 44.66.020(a), the review team shall provide to the chairs or cochairs of the senate and house finance committees a final report. In the report, the review team may
(1) evaluate the success of the agency in achieving its mission through the effective and efficient delivery of its core services, goals, programs, and objectives;
(2) determine whether the agency's results-based measures demonstrate the effectiveness and efficiency of the agency's core services, goals, programs, and objectives and recommend changes if necessary;
(3) determine whether the results-based measures were useful in conducting the review and recommend changes if necessary;
(4) evaluate the appropriateness of the budget reductions proposed under AS 44.66.020(c);
(5) determine whether the agency acted in good faith to correct problems identified in any previous audit or review;
(6) list agency programs or actions not authorized by statute and identify other authority for those actions;
(7) identify agency authority to collect fees, conduct inspections, enforce state law, or impose penalties;
(8) recommend improvements to agency practices and procedures, including means to decrease regulatory burdens or restrictions without decreasing public service and safety;
(9) identify areas in which programs and jurisdiction of agencies overlap and assess the quality of interagency cooperation in those areas;
(10) evaluate whether the agency promptly and effectively addresses complaints;
(11) evaluate to what extent the agency encourages and uses public participation in rulemaking and other decision making;
(12) evaluate the agency's process for implementing technology and recommend new types or uses of technology to improve agency efficiency and effectiveness;
(13) identify services provided by programs and functions duplicated by another government agency or private entity and recommend the most effective and efficient way to perform those services;
(14) evaluate whether the agency priorities reported to the legislature under AS 37.07.050(a)(13) and the list of programs or elements of programs provided under AS 44.66.020(c)(2) are consistent with the results of the performance review;
(15) identify agencies that could be terminated or consolidated, reductions in costs, and potential program or cost reductions based on policy changes;
(16) identify reductions and efficiencies recommended as a result of a review conducted under this section;
(17) identify the extent to which statutory, regulatory, budgetary, or other changes are necessary to enable the agency to better serve the interests of the public and to correct problems identified during the review;
(18) analyze how the review team's recommendation to terminate the agency or to terminate any program within the agency would affect federal funding or instigate federal intervention;
(19) include draft legislation to correct problems identified in the report that shall be introduced by the senate and house finance committees of the state legislature during the current legislative session;
(20) identify areas that need in-depth review in order to provide complete information to the Legislative Budget and Audit Committee for consideration in the audit process; and
(21) identify any other elements appropriate to a performance management review.
(e) The Legislative Budget and Audit Committee shall, based on the amount of the actual reduction in state expenditures reported by the legislative finance division under AS 24.20.231(7) increased by an appropriate inflationary factor to be determined by the Legislative Budget and Audit Committee, estimate the anticipated savings for the second through fifth fiscal years following the review. The Legislative Budget and Audit Committee shall include the amount of the actual reduction and the anticipated future savings in its annual report under AS 24.20.311 for the second fiscal year following the review and each of the subsequent four reports.
(f) The senate and house finance committee chairs, cochairs, and subcommittees may incorporate the recommendations of a report submitted under (d) of this section into the budget for the fiscal year following the report.