reglab/housing_qa huggingface dataset:
UT Code § 76-1-403 (2021)
2021 Utah Code|Title 76 - Utah Criminal Code|Chapter 1 - General Provisions|Part 4 - Multiple Prosecutions and Double Jeopardy|Section 403 - Former prosecution barring subsequent prosecution for offense out of same episode.

76-1-403. Former prosecution barring subsequent prosecution for offense out of same episode.    (1) If a defendant has been prosecuted for one or more offenses arising out of a single criminal episode, a subsequent prosecution for the same or a different offense arising out of the same criminal episode is barred if:   (a) the subsequent prosecution is for an offense that was or should have been tried under Subsection 76-1-402(2) in the former prosecution; and     (b) the former prosecution:   (i) resulted in acquittal;     (ii) resulted in conviction;     (iii) was improperly terminated; or     (iv) was terminated by a final order or judgment for the defendant that has not been reversed, set aside, or vacated and that necessarily required a determination inconsistent with a fact that must be established to secure conviction in the subsequent prosecution.         (2) There is an acquittal if the prosecution resulted in a finding of not guilty by the trier of facts or in a determination that there was insufficient evidence to warrant conviction. A finding of guilty of a lesser included offense is an acquittal of the greater offense even though the conviction for the lesser included offense is subsequently reversed, set aside, or vacated.     (3) There is a conviction if the prosecution resulted in a judgment of guilt that has not been reversed, set aside, or vacated; a verdict of guilty that has not been reversed, set aside, or vacated and that is capable of supporting a judgment; or a plea of guilty accepted by the court.     (4) There is an improper termination of prosecution if the termination takes place before the verdict, is for reasons not amounting to an acquittal, and takes place after a jury has been impaneled and sworn to try the defendant, or, if the jury trial is waived, after the first witness is sworn. However, termination of prosecution is not improper if:   (a) the defendant consents to the termination;     (b) the defendant waives his right to object to the termination; or     (c) the court finds and states for the record that the termination is necessary because:   (i) it is physically impossible to proceed with the trial in conformity with the law;     (ii) there is a legal defect in the proceeding not attributable to the state that would make any judgment entered upon a verdict reversible as a matter of law;     (iii) prejudicial conduct in or out of the courtroom not attributable to the state makes it impossible to proceed with the trial without injustice to the defendant or the state;     (iv) the jury is unable to agree upon a verdict; or     (v) false statements of a juror on voir dire prevent a fair trial.        Amended by Chapter 278, 2013 General Session
UT Code § 76-1-404 (2021)
2021 Utah Code|Title 76 - Utah Criminal Code|Chapter 1 - General Provisions|Part 4 - Multiple Prosecutions and Double Jeopardy|Section 404 - Concurrent jurisdiction -- Prosecution in other jurisdiction barring prosecution in state.

76-1-404. Concurrent jurisdiction -- Prosecution in other jurisdiction barring prosecution in state.  If a defendant's conduct establishes the commission of one or more offenses within the concurrent jurisdiction of this state and of another jurisdiction, federal or state, the prosecution in the other jurisdiction is a bar to a subsequent prosecution in this state if:  (1) the former prosecution resulted in an acquittal, conviction, or termination of prosecution, as those terms are defined in Section 76-1-403; and     (2) the subsequent prosecution is for the same offense or offenses.    Enacted by Chapter 196, 1973 General Session
UT Code § 76-1-405 (2021)
2021 Utah Code|Title 76 - Utah Criminal Code|Chapter 1 - General Provisions|Part 4 - Multiple Prosecutions and Double Jeopardy|Section 405 - Subsequent prosecution not barred -- Circumstances.

76-1-405. Subsequent prosecution not barred -- Circumstances.  A subsequent prosecution for an offense shall not be barred under the following circumstances:  (1) The former prosecution was procured by the defendant without the knowledge of the prosecuting attorney bringing the subsequent prosecution and with intent to avoid the sentence that might otherwise be imposed; or     (2) The former prosecution resulted in a judgment of guilt held invalid in a subsequent proceeding on writ of habeas corpus, coram nobis, or similar collateral attack.    Enacted by Chapter 196, 1973 General Session
UT Code § 76-1-501 (2021)
2021 Utah Code|Title 76 - Utah Criminal Code|Chapter 1 - General Provisions|Part 5 - Burden of Proof|Section 501 - Presumption of innocence -- "Element of the offense" defined.

 Effective 5/13/2014  76-1-501. Presumption of innocence -- "Element of the offense" defined.    (1) A defendant in a criminal proceeding is presumed to be innocent until each element of the offense charged against him is proved beyond a reasonable doubt. In the absence of this proof, the defendant shall be acquitted.     (2) As used in this part, "element of the offense" means:   (a) the conduct, attendant circumstances, or results of conduct proscribed, prohibited, or forbidden in the definition of the offense; and     (b) the culpable mental state required.       (3) The existence of jurisdiction and venue are not elements of the offense but shall be established by a preponderance of the evidence.    Amended by Chapter 40, 2014 General SessionAmended by Chapter 189, 2014 General Session
UT Code § 76-1-502 (2021)
2021 Utah Code|Title 76 - Utah Criminal Code|Chapter 1 - General Provisions|Part 5 - Burden of Proof|Section 502 - Negating defense by allegation or proof -- When not required.

76-1-502. Negating defense by allegation or proof -- When not required.  Section 76-1-501 does not require negating a defense:  (1) By allegation in an information, indictment, or other charge; or     (2) By proof, unless:   (a) The defense is in issue in the case as a result of evidence presented at trial, either by the prosecution or the defense; or     (b) The defense is an affirmative defense, and the defendant has presented evidence of such affirmative defense.      Enacted by Chapter 196, 1973 General Session
UT Code § 76-1-503 (2021)
2021 Utah Code|Title 76 - Utah Criminal Code|Chapter 1 - General Provisions|Part 5 - Burden of Proof|Section 503 - Presumption of fact.

76-1-503. Presumption of fact.  An evidentiary presumption established by this code or other penal statute has the following consequences:  (1) When evidence of facts which support the presumption exist, the issue of the existence of the presumed fact must be submitted to the jury unless the court is satisfied that the evidence as a whole clearly negates the presumed fact;     (2) In submitting the issue of the existence of a presumed fact to the jury, the court shall charge that while the presumed fact must on all evidence be proved beyond a reasonable doubt, the law regards the facts giving rise to the presumption as evidence of the presumed fact.    Enacted by Chapter 196, 1973 General Session
UT Code § 76-1-504 (2021)
2021 Utah Code|Title 76 - Utah Criminal Code|Chapter 1 - General Provisions|Part 5 - Burden of Proof|Section 504 - Affirmative defense presented by defendant.

76-1-504. Affirmative defense presented by defendant.  Evidence of an affirmative defense as defined by this code or other statutes shall be presented by the defendant.  Enacted by Chapter 196, 1973 General Session
UT Code § 76-2-101 (2021)
2021 Utah Code|Title 76 - Utah Criminal Code|Chapter 2 - Principles of Criminal Responsibility|Part 1 - Culpability Generally|Section 101 - Requirements of criminal conduct and criminal responsibility.

76-2-101. Requirements of criminal conduct and criminal responsibility.    (1)   (a) A person is not guilty of an offense unless the person's conduct is prohibited by law; and     (b)   (i) the person acts intentionally, knowingly, recklessly, with criminal negligence, or with a mental state otherwise specified in the statute defining the offense, as the definition of the offense requires; or     (ii) the person's acts constitute an offense involving strict liability.         (2) These standards of criminal responsibility do not apply to the violations set forth in Title 41, Chapter 6a, Traffic Code, unless specifically provided by law.    Amended by Chapter 2, 2005 General Session
UT Code § 76-2-102 (2021)
2021 Utah Code|Title 76 - Utah Criminal Code|Chapter 2 - Principles of Criminal Responsibility|Part 1 - Culpability Generally|Section 102 - Culpable mental state required -- Strict liability.

76-2-102. Culpable mental state required -- Strict liability.  Every offense not involving strict liability shall require a culpable mental state, and when the definition of the offense does not specify a culpable mental state and the offense does not involve strict liability, intent, knowledge, or recklessness shall suffice to establish criminal responsibility. An offense shall involve strict liability if the statute defining the offense clearly indicates a legislative purpose to impose criminal responsibility for commission of the conduct prohibited by the statute without requiring proof of any culpable mental state.  Amended by Chapter 90, 1983 General Session
UT Code § 76-2-103 (2021)
2021 Utah Code|Title 76 - Utah Criminal Code|Chapter 2 - Principles of Criminal Responsibility|Part 1 - Culpability Generally|Section 103 - Definitions.

76-2-103. Definitions.  A person engages in conduct:  (1) Intentionally, or with intent or willfully with respect to the nature of his conduct or to a result of his conduct, when it is his conscious objective or desire to engage in the conduct or cause the result.     (2) Knowingly, or with knowledge, with respect to his conduct or to circumstances surrounding his conduct when he is aware of the nature of his conduct or the existing circumstances. A person acts knowingly, or with knowledge, with respect to a result of his conduct when he is aware that his conduct is reasonably certain to cause the result.     (3) Recklessly with respect to circumstances surrounding his conduct or the result of his conduct when he is aware of but consciously disregards a substantial and unjustifiable risk that the circumstances exist or the result will occur. The risk must be of such a nature and degree that its disregard constitutes a gross deviation from the standard of care that an ordinary person would exercise under all the circumstances as viewed from the actor's standpoint.     (4) With criminal negligence or is criminally negligent with respect to circumstances surrounding his conduct or the result of his conduct when he ought to be aware of a substantial and unjustifiable risk that the circumstances exist or the result will occur. The risk must be of a nature and degree that the failure to perceive it constitutes a gross deviation from the standard of care that an ordinary person would exercise in all the circumstances as viewed from the actor's standpoint.    Amended by Chapter 229, 2007 General Session
UT Code § 76-2-104 (2021)
2021 Utah Code|Title 76 - Utah Criminal Code|Chapter 2 - Principles of Criminal Responsibility|Part 1 - Culpability Generally|Section 104 - Culpable mental state -- Higher mental states included.

76-2-104. Culpable mental state -- Higher mental states included.    (1) If acting with criminal negligence is sufficient to establish the culpable mental state for an element of an offense, that element is also established if a person acts intentionally, knowingly, or recklessly.     (2) If acting recklessly is sufficient to establish the culpable mental state for an element of an offense, that element is also established if a person acts intentionally or knowingly.     (3) If acting knowingly is sufficient to establish the culpable mental state for an element of an offense, that element is also established if a person acts intentionally.    Amended by Chapter 75, 1998 General Session
UT Code § 76-2-105 (2021)
2021 Utah Code|Title 76 - Utah Criminal Code|Chapter 2 - Principles of Criminal Responsibility|Part 1 - Culpability Generally|Section 105 - Transferred intent.

76-2-105. Transferred intent.  Where intentionally causing a result is an element of an offense, that element is established even if a different person than the actor intended was killed, injured, or harmed, or different property than the actor intended was damaged or otherwise affected.  Enacted by Chapter 199, 2004 General Session
UT Code § 76-2-201 (2021)
2021 Utah Code|Title 76 - Utah Criminal Code|Chapter 2 - Principles of Criminal Responsibility|Part 2 - Criminal Responsibility for Conduct of Another|Section 201 - Definitions.

76-2-201. Definitions.  As used in this part:  (1) "Agent" means any director, officer, employee, or other person authorized to act in behalf of a corporation or association.     (2) "High managerial agent" means:   (a) A partner in a partnership;     (b) An officer of a corporation or association;     (c) An agent of a corporation or association who has duties of such responsibility that his conduct reasonably may be assumed to represent the policy of the corporation or association.       (3) "Corporation" means all organizations required by the laws of this state or any other state to obtain a certificate of authority, a certificate of incorporation, or other form of registration to transact business as a corporation within this state or any other state and shall include domestic, foreign, profit and nonprofit corporations, but shall not include a corporation sole, as such term is used in Title 16, Chapter 7, Corporations Sole. Lack of an appropriate certificate of authority, incorporation, or other form of registration shall be no defense when such organization conducted its business in a manner as to appear to have lawful corporate existence.    Enacted by Chapter 196, 1973 General Session
UT Code § 76-2-202 (2021)
2021 Utah Code|Title 76 - Utah Criminal Code|Chapter 2 - Principles of Criminal Responsibility|Part 2 - Criminal Responsibility for Conduct of Another|Section 202 - Criminal responsibility for direct commission of offense or for conduct of another.

76-2-202. Criminal responsibility for direct commission of offense or for conduct of another.  Every person, acting with the mental state required for the commission of an offense who directly commits the offense, who solicits, requests, commands, encourages, or intentionally aids another person to engage in conduct which constitutes an offense shall be criminally liable as a party for such conduct.  Enacted by Chapter 196, 1973 General Session
UT Code § 76-2-203 (2021)
2021 Utah Code|Title 76 - Utah Criminal Code|Chapter 2 - Principles of Criminal Responsibility|Part 2 - Criminal Responsibility for Conduct of Another|Section 203 - Defenses unavailable in prosecution based on conduct of another.

76-2-203. Defenses unavailable in prosecution based on conduct of another.  In any prosecution in which an actor's criminal responsibility is based on the conduct of another, it is no defense:  (1) That the actor belongs to a class of persons who by definition of the offense is legally incapable of committing the offense in an individual capacity, or     (2) That the person for whose conduct the actor is criminally responsible has been acquitted, has not been prosecuted or convicted, has been convicted of a different offense or of a different type or class of offense or is immune from prosecution.    Enacted by Chapter 196, 1973 General Session
UT Code § 76-2-204 (2021)
2021 Utah Code|Title 76 - Utah Criminal Code|Chapter 2 - Principles of Criminal Responsibility|Part 2 - Criminal Responsibility for Conduct of Another|Section 204 - Criminal responsibility of corporation or association.

76-2-204. Criminal responsibility of corporation or association.  A corporation or association is guilty of an offense when:  (1) The conduct constituting the offense consists of an omission to discharge a specific duty of affirmative performance imposed on corporations or associations by law; or     (2) The conduct constituting the offense is authorized, solicited, requested, commanded, or undertaken, performed, or recklessly tolerated by the board of directors or by a high managerial agent acting within the scope of his employment and in behalf of the corporation or association.    Enacted by Chapter 196, 1973 General Session
UT Code § 76-2-205 (2021)
2021 Utah Code|Title 76 - Utah Criminal Code|Chapter 2 - Principles of Criminal Responsibility|Part 2 - Criminal Responsibility for Conduct of Another|Section 205 - Criminal responsibility of person for conduct in name of corporation or association.

76-2-205. Criminal responsibility of person for conduct in name of corporation or association.  A person is criminally liable for conduct constituting an offense which he performs or causes to be performed in the name of or on behalf of a corporation or association to the same extent as if such conduct were performed in his own name or behalf.  Enacted by Chapter 196, 1973 General Session
UT Code § 76-2-301 (2021)
2021 Utah Code|Title 76 - Utah Criminal Code|Chapter 2 - Principles of Criminal Responsibility|Part 3 - Defenses to Criminal Responsibility|Section 301 - Person under 14 years old not criminally responsible.

76-2-301. Person under 14 years old not criminally responsible.  A person is not criminally responsible for conduct performed before he reaches the age of 14 years. This section shall in no way limit the jurisdiction of or proceedings before the juvenile courts of this state.  Enacted by Chapter 196, 1973 General Session
UT Code § 76-2-302 (2021)
2021 Utah Code|Title 76 - Utah Criminal Code|Chapter 2 - Principles of Criminal Responsibility|Part 3 - Defenses to Criminal Responsibility|Section 302 - Compulsion.

76-2-302. Compulsion.    (1) A person is not guilty of an offense when he engaged in the proscribed conduct because he was coerced to do so by the use or threatened imminent use of unlawful physical force upon him or a third person, which force or threatened force a person of reasonable firmness in his situation would not have resisted.     (2) The defense of compulsion provided by this section shall be unavailable to a person who intentionally, knowingly, or recklessly places himself in a situation in which it is probable that he will be subjected to duress.     (3) A married woman is not entitled, by reason of the presence of her husband, to any presumption of compulsion or to any defense of compulsion except as in Subsection (1) provided.     Enacted by Chapter 196, 1973 General Session
UT Code § 76-2-303 (2021)
2021 Utah Code|Title 76 - Utah Criminal Code|Chapter 2 - Principles of Criminal Responsibility|Part 3 - Defenses to Criminal Responsibility|Section 303 - Entrapment.

76-2-303. Entrapment.    (1) It is a defense that the actor was entrapped into committing the offense. Entrapment occurs when a peace officer or a person directed by or acting in cooperation with the officer induces the commission of an offense in order to obtain evidence of the commission for prosecution by methods creating a substantial risk that the offense would be committed by one not otherwise ready to commit it. Conduct merely affording a person an opportunity to commit an offense does not constitute entrapment.     (2) The defense of entrapment shall be unavailable when causing or threatening bodily injury is an element of the offense charged and the prosecution is based on conduct causing or threatening the injury to a person other than the person perpetrating the entrapment.     (3) The defense provided by this section is available even though the actor denies commission of the conduct charged to constitute the offense.     (4) Upon written motion of the defendant, the court shall hear evidence on the issue and shall determine as a matter of fact and law whether the defendant was entrapped to commit the offense. Defendant's motion shall be made at least 10 days before trial except the court for good cause shown may permit a later filing.     (5) Should the court determine that the defendant was entrapped, it shall dismiss the case with prejudice, but if the court determines the defendant was not entrapped, such issue may be presented by the defendant to the jury at trial. Any order by the court dismissing a case based on entrapment shall be appealable by the state.     (6) In any hearing before a judge or jury where the defense of entrapment is an issue, past offenses of the defendant shall not be admitted except that in a trial where the defendant testifies he may be asked of his past convictions for felonies and any testimony given by the defendant at a hearing on entrapment may be used to impeach his testimony at trial.    Amended by Chapter 282, 1998 General Session
UT Code § 76-2-304 (2021)
2021 Utah Code|Title 76 - Utah Criminal Code|Chapter 2 - Principles of Criminal Responsibility|Part 3 - Defenses to Criminal Responsibility|Section 304 - Ignorance or mistake of fact or law.

76-2-304. Ignorance or mistake of fact or law.    (1) Unless otherwise provided, ignorance or mistake of fact which disproves the culpable mental state is a defense to any prosecution for that crime.     (2) Ignorance or mistake concerning the existence or meaning of a penal law is no defense to a crime unless:   (a) Due to his ignorance or mistake, the actor reasonably believed his conduct did not constitute an offense, and     (b) His ignorance or mistake resulted from the actor's reasonable reliance upon:   (i) An official statement of the law contained in a written order or grant of permission by an administrative agency charged by law with responsibility for interpreting the law in question; or     (ii) A written interpretation of the law contained in an opinion of a court of record or made by a public servant charged by law with responsibility for interpreting the law in question.         (3) Although an actor's ignorance or mistake of fact or law may constitute a defense to the offense charged, he may nevertheless be convicted of a lesser included offense of which he would be guilty if the fact or law were as he believed.    Amended by Chapter 32, 1974 General Session