reglab/housing_qa huggingface dataset:
CO Code § 13-14.5-102 (2021)
2021 Colorado Code|Title 13 - Courts and Court Procedure|Article 14.5 - Extreme Risk Protection Orders|§ 13-14.5-102. Definitions

 As used in this article 14.5, unless the context otherwise clearly requires:    “Extreme risk protection order” means either a temporary order or a continuing order granted pursuant to this article 14.5.    “Family or household member” means, with respect to a respondent, any:   Person related by blood, marriage, or adoption to the respondent;    Person who has a child in common with the respondent, regardless of whether such person has been married to the respondent or has lived together with the respondent at any time;    Person who regularly resides or regularly resided with the respondent within the last six months;    Domestic partner of the respondent;    Person who has a biological or legal parent-child relationship with the respondent, including stepparents and stepchildren and grandparents and grandchildren;    Person who is acting or has acted as the respondent's legal guardian; and    A person in any other relationship described in section 18-6-800.3 (2) with the respondent.       “Firearm” has the same meaning as in section 18-1-901 (3)(h).    “Petitioner” means the person who petitions for an extreme risk protection order pursuant to this article 14.5.    “Respondent” means the person who is identified as the respondent in a petition filed pursuant to this article 14.5.     History. Source: L. 2019: Entire article added,(HB 19-1177), ch. 108, p. 383, § 1, effective April 12.
CO Code § 13-14.5-106 (2021)
2021 Colorado Code|Title 13 - Courts and Court Procedure|Article 14.5 - Extreme Risk Protection Orders|§ 13-14.5-106. Service of Protection Orders

  An extreme risk protection order issued pursuant to section 13-14.5-105 must be served personally upon the respondent, except as otherwise provided in this article 14.5.    The law enforcement agency in the jurisdiction where the respondent resides shall serve the respondent personally.    The court clerk shall forward a copy of the extreme risk protection order issued pursuant to this article 14.5 on or before the next court day to the law enforcement agency specified in the order for service. Service of an order issued pursuant to this article 14.5 takes precedence over the service of other documents, unless the other documents are of a similar emergency nature.    If the law enforcement agency cannot complete service upon the respondent within five days, the law enforcement agency shall notify the petitioner. The petitioner shall then provide any additional information regarding the respondent's whereabouts to the law enforcement agency to effect service. The law enforcement agency may request additional time to allow for the proper and safe planning and execution of the court order.    If an extreme risk protection order entered by the court states that the respondent appeared in person before the court, the necessity for further service is waived, and proof of service of that order is not necessary.    Returns of service pursuant to this article 14.5 must be made in accordance with the applicable court rules.    If the respondent is a veteran and there are any criminal charges against the respondent that result from the service or enforcement of the extreme risk protection order, the judge shall refer the case to a veterans court if the jurisdiction has a veterans court and the charges are veterans court eligible.     History. Source: L. 2019: Entire article added,(HB 19-1177), ch. 108, p. 391, § 1, effective April 12.
CO Code § 13-14.5-109 (2021)
2021 Colorado Code|Title 13 - Courts and Court Procedure|Article 14.5 - Extreme Risk Protection Orders|§ 13-14.5-109. Firearms - Return - Disposal

  If an extreme risk protection order or temporary extreme risk protection order is terminated or expires without renewal, a law enforcement agency holding any firearm that has been surrendered pursuant to section 13-14.5-108 or taken custody of pursuant to section 16-3-301.5, or a federally licensed firearms dealer described in 18 U.S.C. sec. 923, as amended, with custody of a firearm, or a relative with custody of an antique firearm or curio or relic pursuant to section (1)(a)(III), must return the firearm requested by a respondent within three days only after confirming, through a criminal history record check performed pursuant to section 24-33.5-424, that the respondent is currently eligible to own or possess a firearm under federal and state law and after confirming with the court that the extreme risk protection order has terminated or has expired without renewal.    Any firearm surrendered by a respondent pursuant to section 13-14.5-108 or taken custody of pursuant to section 16-3-301.5 that remains unclaimed by the lawful owner for at least one year from the date the temporary extreme risk protection order or extreme risk protection order expired, whichever is later, shall be disposed of in accordance with the law enforcement agency's policies and procedures for the disposal of firearms in police custody.     History. Source: L. 2019: Entire article added,(HB 19-1177), ch. 108, p. 396, § 1, effective April 12.
CO Code § 13-14.5-111 (2021)
2021 Colorado Code|Title 13 - Courts and Court Procedure|Article 14.5 - Extreme Risk Protection Orders|§ 13-14.5-111. Penalties

 Any person who has in his or her custody or control a firearm or purchases, possesses, or receives a firearm with knowledge that he or she is prohibited from doing so by an extreme risk protection order or temporary extreme risk protection order issued pursuant to this article 14.5 is guilty of a class 2 misdemeanor.   History. Source: L. 2019: Entire article added,(HB 19-1177), ch. 108, p. 397, § 1, effective April 12.
CO Code § 13-14.5-112 (2021)
2021 Colorado Code|Title 13 - Courts and Court Procedure|Article 14.5 - Extreme Risk Protection Orders|§ 13-14.5-112. Other Authority Retained

 This article 14.5 does not affect the ability of a law enforcement officer to remove a firearm or concealed carry permit from a person or conduct a search and seizure for any firearm pursuant to other lawful authority.   History. Source: L. 2019: Entire article added,(HB 19-1177), ch. 108, p. 398, § 1, effective April 12.
CO Code § 13-14.5-113 (2021)
2021 Colorado Code|Title 13 - Courts and Court Procedure|Article 14.5 - Extreme Risk Protection Orders|§ 13-14.5-113. Liability

  Except as provided in section 13-14.5-111, this article 14.5 does not impose criminal or civil liability on any person or entity for acts or omissions made in good faith related to obtaining an extreme risk protection order or a temporary extreme risk protection order, including but not limited to reporting, declining to report, investigating, declining to investigate, filing, or declining to file a petition pursuant to this article 14.5.    A person who files a malicious or false petition for a temporary extreme risk protection order or an extreme risk protection order may be subject to criminal prosecution for those acts.    A federally licensed firearms dealer or law enforcement agency that stores a firearm as permitted by this article 14.5 is not civilly liable for any resulting damages to the firearm, as long as such damage did not result from the willful and wrongful act or gross negligence of the person or law enforcement agency storing the firearm.     History. Source: L. 2019: Entire article added,(HB 19-1177), ch. 108, p. 398, § 1, effective April 12. L. 2021: (3) added,(HB 21-1255), ch. 293, p. 1753, § 6, effective June 22.
CO Code § 13-14.5-114 (2021)
2021 Colorado Code|Title 13 - Courts and Court Procedure|Article 14.5 - Extreme Risk Protection Orders|§ 13-14.5-114. Instructional and Informational Material - Definition

     The state court administrator shall develop standard petitions and extreme risk protection order forms and temporary extreme risk protection order forms in more than one language consistent with state judicial department practices. The standard petition and order forms must be used after January 1, 2020, for all petitions filed and orders issued pursuant to this article 14.5. The state court administrator may consult with interested parties in developing the petitions and forms. The materials must be available online consistent with state judicial department practices.    The extreme risk protection order form must include, in a conspicuous location, notice of criminal penalties resulting from violation of the order and the following statement:You have the sole responsibility to avoid or refrain from violating this extreme risk protection order's provisions. Only the court can change the order and only upon written motion.       A court clerk for each judicial district shall create a community resource list of crisis intervention, mental health, substance abuse, interpreter, counseling, and other relevant resources serving the county in which the court is located. The court shall make the community resource list available as part of or in addition to the informational brochures described in subsection (1) of this section.    The state court administrator shall distribute a master copy of the standard petition and extreme risk protection order forms to all court clerks and all district and county courts.    Courts shall accept petitions pursuant to sections 13-14.5-103 and 13-14.5-104 beginning on January 1, 2020.     History. Source: L. 2019: Entire article added,(HB 19-1177), ch. 108, p. 398, § 1, effective April 12.
CO Code § 13-15-102 (2021)
2021 Colorado Code|Title 13 - Courts and Court Procedure|Article 15 - Change of Name|§ 13-15-102. Publication of Change

  Public notice of a change of name shall be given at least three times within twenty-one days after the court orders publication pursuant to section 13-15-101 (1.5). The person changing his or her name shall cause such public notice to be given in a newspaper published in the county in which the person resides. If no newspaper is published in that county, such notice shall be published in a newspaper in such county as the court directs.    Public notice of such name change through publication as required in subsection (1) of this section shall not be required if the petitioner has been:   The victim of a crime, the underlying factual basis of which has been found by the court on the record to include an act of domestic violence, as defined in section 18-6-800.3 (1), C.R.S.;    The victim of child abuse, as defined in section 18-6-401, C.R.S.; or    The victim of domestic abuse as that term is defined in section 13-14-101 (2).       A petitioner need not give public notice of a name change as required by subsection (1) of this section if the petitioner qualifies for the simplified process under section 13-15-101 (5).    A petitioner need not give public notice of a name change as required by subsection (1) of this section if the petitioner is changing the petitioner's name to conform with the petitioner's gender identity.     History. Source: G.L. § 1851. G.S. § 2453. R.S. 08: § 4349. C.L. § 6485. CSA: C. 30, § 2. CRS 53: § 19-1-2 . C.R.S. 1963: § 20-1-2 . L. 99: Entire section amended, p. 1178, § 4, effective June 2. L. 2004: (2)(c) amended, p. 554, § 7, effective July 1; (1) amended, p. 120, § 2, effective September 1. L. 2005: (1) amended, p. 21, § 2, effective February 23. L. 2014: (3) added,(SB 14-087), ch. 306, p. 1298, § 4, effective August 6. L. 2019: (4) added,(HB 19-1039), ch. 377, p. 3408, § 6, effective January 1, 2020.    Cross references:   For the number of publications required, see § 24-70-106 .
CO Code § 13-16-106 (2021)
2021 Colorado Code|Title 13 - Courts and Court Procedure|Article 16 - Costs- Civil Actions|§ 13-16-106. Costs in Replevin

 Any person making justification or cognizance in replevin, if the same is found for him, or the plaintiff is nonsuited or nonprossed, suffers discontinuance, or is otherwise barred, then such person shall recover his damages and costs against the plaintiff.   History. Source: R.S. P. 155, § 6. G.L. § 328. G.S. § 402. R.S. 08: § 1066. C.L. § 6582. CSA: C. 43, § 12. CRS 53: § 33-1-6 . C.R.S. 1963: § 33-1-6 .
CO Code § 13-16-107 (2021)
2021 Colorado Code|Title 13 - Courts and Court Procedure|Article 16 - Costs- Civil Actions|§ 13-16-107. Costs on Motion to Dismiss

 If, in any action, judgment upon motion to dismiss by either party to the action is given against the plaintiff, the defendant shall recover costs against the plaintiff; if such judgment is given for the plaintiff, he shall recover costs against the defendant.   History. Source: R.S. P. 155, § 7. G.L. § 329. G.S. § 403. R.S. 08: § 1056. C.L. § 6572. CSA: C. 43, § 2. CRS 53: § 33-1-7 . C.R.S. 1963: § 33-1-7 .    ANNOTATION   Where a case is remanded for further proceedings by the Colorado Court of Appeals, an award of costs pursuant to this section is inappropriate. Dalton v. Miller, 984 P.2d 666 (Colo. App. 1999).   A court that grants a motion to dismiss but does not enter judgment thereon lacks authority to award costs under this section. Sotelo v. Hutchens Trucking Co., 166 P.3d 285 (Colo. App. 2007).
CO Code § 13-16-108 (2021)
2021 Colorado Code|Title 13 - Courts and Court Procedure|Article 16 - Costs- Civil Actions|§ 13-16-108. When Several Matters Pleaded

 When any defendant in any action, or plaintiff in replevin, pleads several matters, and any of such matters upon demurrer joined are adjudged insufficient, or if a verdict is found in any issue of the cause for the plaintiff, costs shall be given at the discretion of the court.   History. Source: R.S. P. 155, § 8. G.L. § 330. G.S. § 404. R.S. 08: § 1067. C.L. § 6583. CSA: C. 43, § 13. CRS 53: § 33-1-8 . C.R.S. 1963: § 33-1-8 .    ANNOTATION   For trial court's ruling that each party pay his own cost not being an abuse of discretion, see Livingston v. Utah-Colorado Land & Live Stock Co., 106 Colo. 278 , 103 P.2d 684 (1940); W. H. Woolley & Co. v. Bear Creek Manor, 735 P.2d 910 (Colo. App. 1986).   Where each party prevails in part an award of costs is committed to sole discretion of trial court and court's discretion remains unaffected by fact that judgment awarded to one party is larger than judgment awarded to the other. Husband v. Colo. Mtn. Cellars, 867 P.2d 57 (Colo. App. 1993); Archer v. Farmer Bros., 70 P.3d 495 (Colo. App. 2002), aff'd, 90 P.3d 228 (Colo. 2004).   When a case involves many claims, some of which are successful and some of which are not, it is left to the sole discretion of the trial court to determine which party, if any, is the prevailing party and whether costs should be awarded. Archer v. Farmer Bros. Co., 90 P.3d 228 (Colo. 2004).
CO Code § 13-16-109 (2021)
2021 Colorado Code|Title 13 - Courts and Court Procedure|Article 16 - Costs- Civil Actions|§ 13-16-109. Costs on Several Counts

 Where there are several counts in any declaration, and any of them are adjudged insufficient, or a verdict on any issue joined thereon is found for the defendant, costs shall be awarded in the discretion of the court.   History. Source: R.S. P. 155, § 9. G.L. § 331. G.S. § 405. R.S. 08: § 1063. C.L. § 6579. CSA: C. 43, § 9. CRS 53: § 33-1-9 . C.R.S. 1963: § 33-1-9 .    ANNOTATION   Where each party prevails in part an award of costs is committed to sole discretion of trial court and court's discretion remains unaffected by fact that judgment awarded to one party is larger than judgment awarded to the other. Husband v. Colo. Mtn. Cellars, 867 P.2d 57 (Colo. App. 1993).   When a case involves many claims, some of which are successful and some of which are not, it is left to the sole discretion of the trial court to determine which party, if any, is the prevailing party and whether costs should be awarded. Archer v. Farmer Bros. Co., 90 P.3d 228 (Colo. 2004).
CO Code § 13-16-110 (2021)
2021 Colorado Code|Title 13 - Courts and Court Procedure|Article 16 - Costs- Civil Actions|§ 13-16-110. When Several Defendants

 Where several persons are made defendants to any action of trespass, assault, false imprisonment, detinue, replevin, trover, or ejectment, and any one or more of them are upon trial acquitted by verdict, every person so acquitted shall recover his costs of suit in like manner as if such verdict or acquittal had been given in favor of the defendant.   History. Source: R.S. P. 155, § 10. G.L. § 332. G.S. § 406. R.S. 08: § 1068. C.L. § 6584. CSA: C. 43, § 14. CRS 53: § 33-1-10 . C.R.S. 1963: § 33-1-10 .
CO Code § 13-16-111 (2021)
2021 Colorado Code|Title 13 - Courts and Court Procedure|Article 16 - Costs- Civil Actions|§ 13-16-111. Recovery of Costs of Suit

 A plaintiff who obtains judgment or an award of execution in an action brought under subsection (4) or (5) of rule 106 (a), C.R.C.P., shall recover his costs of suit. The defendant shall recover his costs if the action brought under subsection (4) or (5) of rule 106 (a), C.R.C.P., is dismissed pursuant to rule 41, C.R.C.P.   History. Source: R.S. P. 155, § 11. G.L. § 333. G.S. § 407. R.S. 08: § 1069. C.L. § 6585. CSA: C. 43, § 15. CRS 53: § 33-1-11 . C.R.S. 1963: § 33-1-11 .    ANNOTATION   The word “shall” in this section evinces a legislative intent that the prevailing party in a C.R.C.P. 106(a)(4) action must be awarded reasonable costs. Carney v. Civil Serv. Comm'n, 30 P.3d 861 (Colo. App. 2001).   Section allows a prevailing plaintiff in a C.R.C.P. 106(a)(4) action to recover costs against the state, its officers, or agencies. Branch v. Colo. Dept. of Corr., 89 P.3d 496 (Colo. App. 2003).   This section does not require an award of costs if a party achieves mixed success in a C.R.C.P. 106(a)(4) action involving multiple claims or issues. Any other reading would require a court to ignore §§ 13-16-108 and 13-16-109 and established case law that provides the court discretion to award costs if a party achieves some success when several matters are pleaded. Phillips v. Watkins, 166 P.3d 197 (Colo. App. 2007).   Applied in Romero v. Rossmiller, 43 Colo. App. 215, 603 P.2d 964 (1979); Rossmiller v. Romero, 625 P.2d 1029 (Colo. 1981).
CO Code § 13-16-112 (2021)
2021 Colorado Code|Title 13 - Courts and Court Procedure|Article 16 - Costs- Civil Actions|§ 13-16-112. Number of Witness Fees Taxed

 In no case in the district court shall the fees of more than four witnesses be taxed against the party against whom judgment is given for costs, unless the court certifies on its minutes that more than four witnesses were really necessary, in which case the clerk shall tax the costs of as many witnesses as the court so certifies.   History. Source: R.S. P. 155, § 12. G.L. § 334. G.S. § 408. R.S. 08: § 1062. C.L. § 6578. CSA: C. 43, § 8. CRS 53: § 33-1-12 . C.R.S. 1963: § 33-1-12 .    ANNOTATION   The section is confined to civil cases, and it is not the intention of the general assembly to extend it to criminal proceedings. Had it been thought necessary and proper, it would have been embraced in the criminal code. Parker v. People, 7 Colo. App. 56, 42 P. 172 (1895).   Hearing upon remand considered separate hearing. Under this section, a hearing held after remand was a separate hearing, and plaintiff would be entitled to use such witnesses as may be considered necessary by him to present his evidence, subject to the restriction contained in this section. Yeager Garden Acres, Inc. v. Summit Constr. Co., 32 Colo. App. 242, 513 P.2d 458 (1973).   Award for fees of eight witnesses without specific finding for their necessity held to be error in child custody hearing. Weber v. Wallace, 789 P.2d 427 (Colo. App. 1989).   Record of trial court was not sufficient to determine which costs were allowed and whether they were reasonable and permitted by statute, thereby requiring a remand to the trial court to make findings under this section and § 13-16-112 . Fenton v. Fibreboard Corp., 827 P.2d 564 (Colo. App. 1991).   Applied in Denver Urban Renewal Auth. v. Hayutin, 40 Colo. App. 559, 583 P.2d 296 (1978).
CO Code § 13-16-113 (2021)
2021 Colorado Code|Title 13 - Courts and Court Procedure|Article 16 - Costs- Civil Actions|§ 13-16-113. Costs Upon Dismissal or Summary Judgment

  In all cases where any action is dismissed for irregularity, or is nonprossed or nonsuited by reason that the plaintiff neglects to prosecute the same, the defendant shall have judgment for his costs.    In all actions brought as a result of a death or an injury to person or property occasioned by the tort of any other person, where any such action is dismissed prior to trial under rule 12 (b) of the Colorado rules of civil procedure, the defendant shall have judgment for his costs. This subsection (2) shall not apply if a motion under rule 12 (b)(5) of the Colorado rules of civil procedure is treated as a motion for summary judgment and disposed of as provided in rule 56 of the Colorado rules of civil procedure.     History. Source: R.S. P. 155, § 13. G.L. § 335. G.S. § 409. R.S. 08: § 1059. C.L. § 6575. CSA: C. 43, § 5. CRS 53: § 33-1-13 . C.R.S. 1963: § 33-1-13 . L. 87: Entire section amended, p. 547, § 1, effective July 1.    ANNOTATION   Law reviews. For article, “1988 Update on Colorado Tort Reform Legislation -- Part II”, see 17 Colo. Law. 1949 (1988).   Award of costs for claims dismissed because of failure to prosecute is mandatory. Munoz v. Measner, 214 P.3d 510 (Colo. App. 2009), rev'd on other grounds, 247 P.3d 1031 (Colo. 2011).   The specific limitation in the second sentence of subsection (2) cannot reasonably be interpreted as a general prohibition extending to all motions for summary judgment brought under C.R.C.P. 56, and the defendant's entitlement to an award of costs was properly considered under C.R.C.P. 54(d). Spencer v. United Mortg. Co., 857 P.2d 1342 (Colo. App. 1993).   This section and § 13-17-201 mandate awards of attorney fees and costs and do not permit a reduction for work that may be used in companion litigation. Crandall v. City & County of Denver, 238 P.3d 659 (Colo. 2010).
CO Code § 13-16-114 (2021)
2021 Colorado Code|Title 13 - Courts and Court Procedure|Article 16 - Costs- Civil Actions|§ 13-16-114. Costs in Equity

 Upon the complainant dismissing his bill in equity or the defendant dismissing the same for want of prosecution, the defendant shall recover against the complainant full costs; and, in all other cases in equity not otherwise directed by law, it is in the discretion of the court to award costs or not.   History. Source: R.S. P. 155, § 14. G.L. § 336. G.S. § 410. R.S. 08: § 1060. C.L. § 6576. CSA: C. 43, § 6. CRS 53: § 33-1-14 . C.R.S. 1963: § 33-1-14 .    ANNOTATION   In an equity case the taxation of costs ordinarily rests in the sound discretion of the court, and its action in assessing the fees of expert witnesses as a part of the costs will not be disturbed on review where no abuse of discretion appears. Union Exploration Co. v. Moffat Tunnel Imp. Dist., 104 Colo. 109 , 89 P.2d 257 (1939).   For a court of equity charging costs of surveyor to losing party, see Moore v. Burritt, 106 Colo. 413 , 105 P.2d 1084 (1940).   C.R.C.P. 68 applies only to actions at law which seek a money judgment. Court held to be correct in refusing to apply said rule to dissolution of marriage proceeding which is an action in equity that does not seek a money judgment at law. Such cases are governed by this section which authorizes court to award costs or not. In re Marshall, 781 P.2d 177 (Colo. App. 1989), cert. denied, 794 P.2d 1011 (Colo. 1990).
CO Code § 13-16-115 (2021)
2021 Colorado Code|Title 13 - Courts and Court Procedure|Article 16 - Costs- Civil Actions|§ 13-16-115. In Suit for Use of Another

 When any suit is commenced in the name of one person to the use of another, the person to whose use the action is brought shall be held liable and bound for the payment of all costs which the plaintiff may be adjudged or bound to pay, to be recovered by civil action.   History. Source: R.S. P. 156, § 15. G.L. § 337. G.S. § 411. R.S. 08: § 1057. C.L. § 6573. CSA: C. 43, § 3. CRS 53: § 33-1-15 . C.R.S. 1963: § 33-1-15 .