reglab/housing_qa huggingface dataset:
UT Code § 77-13-2 (2021)
2021 Utah Code|Title 77 - Utah Code of Criminal Procedure|Chapter 13 - Pleas|Section 2 - Record of plea -- Effect of each kind of plea.

77-13-2. Record of plea -- Effect of each kind of plea.  Every plea shall be entered upon the record of the court and shall have the following effect:  (1) A plea of not guilty is a denial of the guilt of the accused and puts in issue every material allegation of the information or indictment;     (2) A plea of guilty is an acknowledgment that the accused is guilty of the offense charged; and     (3) A plea of no contest indicates the accused does not challenge the charges in the information or indictment and if accepted by the court shall have the same effect as a plea of guilty and imposition of sentence may be rendered in the same manner as if a plea of guilty had been entered.    Enacted by Chapter 15, 1980 General Session
UT Code § 77-13-3 (2021)
2021 Utah Code|Title 77 - Utah Code of Criminal Procedure|Chapter 13 - Pleas|Section 3 - Court approval of no contest plea required.

77-13-3. Court approval of no contest plea required.  A plea of no contest may be entered by the accused only upon approval of the court and only after due consideration of the views of the parties and the interest of the public in the effective administration of justice.  Enacted by Chapter 15, 1980 General Session
UT Code § 77-13-4 (2021)
2021 Utah Code|Title 77 - Utah Code of Criminal Procedure|Chapter 13 - Pleas|Section 4 - Felonies -- Entry in open court.

77-13-4. Felonies -- Entry in open court.  All pleas in felony cases shall be entered by the defendant in open court and the proceedings recorded.  Enacted by Chapter 15, 1980 General Session
UT Code § 77-13-5 (2021)
2021 Utah Code|Title 77 - Utah Code of Criminal Procedure|Chapter 13 - Pleas|Section 5 - Failure to plead -- Not guilty entered.

77-13-5. Failure to plead -- Not guilty entered.  When a defendant does not enter a plea, the court shall enter a plea of not guilty for him.  Enacted by Chapter 15, 1980 General Session
UT Code § 77-13-6 (2021)
2021 Utah Code|Title 77 - Utah Code of Criminal Procedure|Chapter 13 - Pleas|Section 6 - Withdrawal of plea.

77-13-6. Withdrawal of plea.    (1) A plea of not guilty may be withdrawn at any time prior to conviction.     (2)   (a) A plea of guilty or no contest may be withdrawn only upon leave of the court and a showing that it was not knowingly and voluntarily made.     (b) A request to withdraw a plea of guilty or no contest, except for a plea held in abeyance, shall be made by motion before sentence is announced. Sentence may not be announced unless the motion is denied. For a plea held in abeyance, a motion to withdraw the plea shall be made within 30 days of pleading guilty or no contest.     (c) Any challenge to a guilty plea not made within the time period specified in Subsection (2)(b) shall be pursued under Title 78B, Chapter 9, Postconviction Remedies Act, and Rule 65C, Utah Rules of Civil Procedure.      Amended by Chapter 3, 2008 General Session
UT Code § 77-14-1 (2021)
2021 Utah Code|Title 77 - Utah Code of Criminal Procedure|Chapter 14 - Defenses|Section 1 - Time and place of alleged offense -- Specification.

77-14-1. Time and place of alleged offense -- Specification.  The prosecuting attorney, on timely written demand of the defendant, shall within 10 days, or such other time as the court may allow, specify in writing as particularly as is known to him the place, date and time of the commission of the offense charged.  Enacted by Chapter 15, 1980 General Session
UT Code § 77-14-2 (2021)
2021 Utah Code|Title 77 - Utah Code of Criminal Procedure|Chapter 14 - Defenses|Section 2 - Alibi -- Notice requirements -- Witness lists.

77-14-2. Alibi -- Notice requirements -- Witness lists.    (1) A defendant, whether or not written demand has been made, who intends to offer evidence of an alibi shall, not less than 10 days before trial or at such other time as the court may allow, file and serve on the prosecuting attorney a notice, in writing, of his intention to claim alibi. The notice shall contain specific information as to the place where the defendant claims to have been at the time of the alleged offense and, as particularly as is known to the defendant or his attorney, the names and addresses of the witnesses by whom he proposes to establish alibi. The prosecuting attorney, not more than five days after receipt of the list provided herein or at such other time as the court may direct, shall file and serve the defendant with the addresses, as particularly as are known to him, of the witnesses the state proposes to offer to contradict or impeach the defendant's alibi evidence.     (2) The defendant and prosecuting attorney shall be under a continuing duty to disclose the names and addresses of additional witnesses which come to the attention of either party after filing their alibi witness lists.     (3) If a defendant or prosecuting attorney fails to comply with the requirements of this section, the court may exclude evidence offered to establish or rebut alibi. However, the defendant may always testify on his own behalf concerning alibi.     (4) The court may, for good cause shown, waive the requirements of this section.    Enacted by Chapter 15, 1980 General Session
UT Code § 77-14-4 (2021)
2021 Utah Code|Title 77 - Utah Code of Criminal Procedure|Chapter 14 - Defenses|Section 4 - Insanity or diminished mental capacity -- Notice requirement.

 Effective 5/14/2019  77-14-4. Insanity or diminished mental capacity -- Notice requirement.    (1) If a defendant intends to offer evidence that the defendant is not guilty as a result of insanity or that the defendant had diminished mental capacity, or intends to offer evidence in mitigation of a criminal homicide or attempted criminal homicide offense under Subsection 76-5-205.5(2)(a), the defendant shall file and serve the prosecuting attorney with written notice of the intention to claim the defense at the time of arraignment or as soon afterward as practicable, but not less than 30 days before the trial.     (2) If the court receives notice that a defendant intends to claim that the defendant is not guilty by reason of insanity or that the defendant had diminished mental capacity, the court shall proceed in accordance with the requirements described in Section 77-16a-301.    Amended by Chapter 312, 2019 General Session
UT Code § 77-14-6 (2021)
2021 Utah Code|Title 77 - Utah Code of Criminal Procedure|Chapter 14 - Defenses|Section 6 - Entrapment -- Notice of claim required.

77-14-6. Entrapment -- Notice of claim required.  Notice of a claim of entrapment shall be given by the defendant in accord with Section 76-2-303.  Amended by Chapter 194, 1986 General Session
UT Code § 77-15-1 (2021)
2021 Utah Code|Title 77 - Utah Code of Criminal Procedure|Chapter 15 - Inquiry into Sanity of Defendant|Section 1 - Incompetent individual not to be tried for public offense.

 Effective 5/8/2018  77-15-1. Incompetent individual not to be tried for public offense.  An individual who is incompetent to proceed may not be tried for a public offense. Amended by Chapter 147, 2018 General Session
UT Code § 77-15-2 (2021)
2021 Utah Code|Title 77 - Utah Code of Criminal Procedure|Chapter 15 - Inquiry into Sanity of Defendant|Section 2 - Definitions.

 Effective 5/8/2018  77-15-2. Definitions.  As used in this chapter:  (1) "Competency evaluation" means an evaluation conducted by a forensic evaluator to determine if an individual is competent to stand trial.     (2) "Competent to stand trial" means that a defendant has:   (a) a rational and factual understanding of the criminal proceedings against the defendant and of the punishment specified for the offense charged; and     (b) the ability to consult with the defendant's legal counsel with a reasonable degree of rational understanding in order to assist in the defense.       (3) "Department" means the Department of Human Services.     (4) "Forensic evaluator" means a licensed mental health professional who is:   (a) not involved in the defendant's treatment; and     (b) trained and qualified by the department to conduct a competency evaluation, a restoration screening, and a progress toward competency evaluation.       (5) "Incompetent to proceed" means that a defendant is not competent to stand trial.     (6) "Petition" means a petition to request a court to determine whether a defendant is competent to stand trial.     (7) "Progress toward competency evaluation" means an evaluation to determine whether an individual who is receiving restoration treatment is:   (a) competent to stand trial;     (b) incompetent to proceed but has a substantial probability of becoming competent to stand trial in the foreseeable future; or     (c) incompetent to proceed and does not have a substantial probability of becoming competent to stand trial in the foreseeable future.       (8) "Restoration screening" means an assessment of an individual determined to be incompetent to stand trial for the purpose of determining the appropriate placement and restoration treatment for the individual.     (9) "Restoration treatment" means training and treatment that is:   (a) provided to an individual who is incompetent to proceed;     (b) tailored to the individual's particular impairment to competency; and     (c) limited to the purpose of restoring the individual to competency.      Amended by Chapter 147, 2018 General Session
UT Code § 77-15-3 (2021)
2021 Utah Code|Title 77 - Utah Code of Criminal Procedure|Chapter 15 - Inquiry into Sanity of Defendant|Section 3 - Petition for inquiry regarding defendant or prisoner -- Filing -- Contents.

 Effective 5/8/2018  77-15-3. Petition for inquiry regarding defendant or prisoner -- Filing -- Contents.    (1) When a defendant charged with a public offense or serving a sentence of imprisonment is incompetent to proceed, an individual described in Subsection (2)(b) may file a petition in the district court of the county where the charge is pending or where the defendant is confined.     (2)   (a) The petition shall contain a certificate that it is filed in good faith and on reasonable grounds to believe the defendant is incompetent to proceed. The petition shall contain a recital of the facts, observations, and conversations with the defendant that have formed the basis for the petition. If filed by defense counsel, the petition may not disclose information in violation of the attorney-client privilege.     (b) The petition may be based upon knowledge or information and belief and may be filed by the defendant, any person acting on behalf of the defendant, the prosecuting attorney, or any person having custody or supervision over the defendant.      Amended by Chapter 147, 2018 General Session
UT Code § 77-15-3.5 (2021)
2021 Utah Code|Title 77 - Utah Code of Criminal Procedure|Chapter 15 - Inquiry into Sanity of Defendant|Section 3.5 - Incompetent to proceed in misdemeanor cases.

 Effective 5/8/2018  77-15-3.5. Incompetent to proceed in misdemeanor cases.    (1) When a defendant charged with a misdemeanor is incompetent to proceed, a petition may be filed in the district court of the county where the charge is pending or where the defendant is confined.     (2) If the most severe charge against a defendant is a misdemeanor and the defendant is adjudicated by a court as incompetent to proceed:   (a) the department shall provide restoration treatment to the defendant; and     (b) the court may refer the defendant to pretrial diversion services, upon agreement of the prosecution and defense counsel.       (3) Unless the prosecutor indicates that civil commitment proceedings will be initiated under Subsection 77-15-6(5)(c), a court shall release a defendant who is incompetent to proceed if:   (a) the most severe charge against the defendant is no more severe than a class B misdemeanor;     (b) more than 60 days have passed after the day on which the court adjudicated the defendant incompetent to proceed; and     (c) the defendant has not been restored to competency.       (4) A court may dismiss the charges against a defendant who was released under Subsection (3).    Enacted by Chapter 147, 2018 General Session
UT Code § 77-15-4 (2021)
2021 Utah Code|Title 77 - Utah Code of Criminal Procedure|Chapter 15 - Inquiry into Sanity of Defendant|Section 4 - Court may raise issue of competency at any time.

 Effective 5/8/2018  77-15-4. Court may raise issue of competency at any time.  The court in which a charge is pending may raise the issue of a defendant's competency at any time. If raised by the court, the court shall permit counsel for each party to address the issue of competency. Amended by Chapter 147, 2018 General Session
UT Code § 77-15-7 (2021)
2021 Utah Code|Title 77 - Utah Code of Criminal Procedure|Chapter 15 - Inquiry into Sanity of Defendant|Section 7 - Statute of limitations and speedy trial -- Effect of incompetency of defendant.

 Effective 5/8/2018  77-15-7. Statute of limitations and speedy trial -- Effect of incompetency of defendant.    (1) The statute of limitations is tolled during any period in which the defendant is adjudicated incompetent to proceed.     (2) Any period of time during which the defendant has been adjudicated incompetent to proceed and any period during which the defendant is being evaluated for competency may not be computed in determining the defendant's speedy trial rights.    Amended by Chapter 147, 2018 General Session
UT Code § 77-15-8 (2021)
2021 Utah Code|Title 77 - Utah Code of Criminal Procedure|Chapter 15 - Inquiry into Sanity of Defendant|Section 8 - Bail exonerated on commitment of defendant.

77-15-8. Bail exonerated on commitment of defendant.  When a defendant awaiting trial is committed to a mental health facility, bail shall be exonerated.  Enacted by Chapter 15, 1980 General Session
UT Code § 77-15-9 (2021)
2021 Utah Code|Title 77 - Utah Code of Criminal Procedure|Chapter 15 - Inquiry into Sanity of Defendant|Section 9 - Expenses.

 Effective 5/8/2018  77-15-9. Expenses.    (1) In determining the competence of a defendant to proceed, expenses of examination, observation, or treatment, excluding travel to and from any mental health facility, shall be charged to the department when the offense is a state offense. Travel expenses incurred by the defendant shall be charged to the county where prosecution is commenced. Examination of a defendant on local ordinance violations shall be charged by the department to the municipality or county commencing the prosecution.     (2) When examination is initiated by the court or on motion of the prosecutor, expenses of commitment and treatment of the defendant, if the defendant is determined to be incompetent to proceed, shall also be charged to the department.     (3) Expenses of examination, treatment, or confinement in a mental health facility for any individual who has been convicted of a crime and placed in a state correctional facility shall be charged to the Department of Corrections.     (4) If, after evaluation, the court determines that a defendant is competent to stand trial, all subsequent costs are charged to the county commencing prosecution. If the defendant requested the examination and is found to be competent to stand trial by the court, the department may recover the expenses of the examination from the defendant.    Amended by Chapter 147, 2018 General Session
UT Code § 77-15a-101 (2021)
2021 Utah Code|Title 77 - Utah Code of Criminal Procedure|Chapter 15a - Exemptions From Death Penalty In Capital Cases|Section 101 - Intellectually disabled defendant not subject to death penalty -- Defendant with subaverage functioning not subject to death penalty if confession not corroborated.

 Effective 5/10/2016  77-15a-101. Intellectually disabled defendant not subject to death penalty -- Defendant with subaverage functioning not subject to death penalty if confession not corroborated.    (1) A defendant who is found by the court to be intellectually disabled as defined in Section 77-15a-102 is not subject to the death penalty.     (2) A defendant who does not meet the definition of intellectually disabled under Section 77-15a-102 is not subject to the death penalty if:   (a) the defendant has significantly subaverage general intellectual functioning that exists concurrently with significant deficiencies in adaptive functioning;     (b) the functioning described in Subsection (2)(a) is manifested prior to age 22; and     (c) the state intends to introduce into evidence a confession by the defendant which is not supported by substantial evidence independent of the confession.      Amended by Chapter 115, 2016 General Session
UT Code § 77-15a-102 (2021)
2021 Utah Code|Title 77 - Utah Code of Criminal Procedure|Chapter 15a - Exemptions From Death Penalty In Capital Cases|Section 102 - "Intellectually disabled" defined.

 Effective 5/10/2016  77-15a-102. "Intellectually disabled" defined.  As used in this chapter, a defendant is " intellectually disabled" if:  (1) the defendant has significant subaverage general intellectual functioning that results in and exists concurrently with significant deficiencies in adaptive functioning that exist primarily in the areas of reasoning or impulse control, or in both of these areas; and     (2) the subaverage general intellectual functioning and the significant deficiencies in adaptive functioning under Subsection (1) are both manifested prior to age 22.    Amended by Chapter 115, 2016 General Session
UT Code § 77-15a-103 (2021)
2021 Utah Code|Title 77 - Utah Code of Criminal Procedure|Chapter 15a - Exemptions From Death Penalty In Capital Cases|Section 103 - Court may raise issue of intellectual disability at any time.

 Effective 5/10/2016  77-15a-103. Court may raise issue of intellectual disability at any time.  The court in which a capital charge is pending may raise the issue of the defendant's intellectual disability at any time. If raised by the court, counsel for each party shall be allowed to address the issue of intellectual disability. Amended by Chapter 115, 2016 General Session
UT Code § 77-15a-105 (2021)
2021 Utah Code|Title 77 - Utah Code of Criminal Procedure|Chapter 15a - Exemptions From Death Penalty In Capital Cases|Section 105 - Defendant's wilful failure to cooperate -- Expert testimony regarding intellectual disability is barred.

77-15a-105. Defendant's wilful failure to cooperate -- Expert testimony regarding intellectual disability is barred.    (1) If the defendant files notice, raises the issue, or intends to present evidence or make an argument that the defendant is exempt from the death penalty under this chapter, the defendant shall make himself available and fully cooperate in any examination by mental health experts appointed by the Department of Human Services and any other independent examiners for the defense or the prosecution.     (2) If the defendant wilfully fails to make himself available and fully cooperate in the examination, and that failure is established to the satisfaction of the court, the defendant is barred from presenting expert testimony relating to any exemption from the death penalty under this chapter.    Enacted by Chapter 11, 2003 General Session
UT Code § 77-15a-106 (2021)
2021 Utah Code|Title 77 - Utah Code of Criminal Procedure|Chapter 15a - Exemptions From Death Penalty In Capital Cases|Section 106 - Limitations on admitting intellectual disability examination evidence.

77-15a-106. Limitations on admitting intellectual disability examination evidence.    (1) The following may not be admitted into evidence against the defendant in any criminal proceeding, except as provided in Subsection (2):   (a) any statement made by the defendant in the course of any mental examination conducted under this chapter, whether the examination is with or without the consent of the defendant, and any testimony by the expert based upon the defendant's statement; and     (b) any other fruits of the defendant's statement under Subsection (1)(a).       (2) Evidence under Subsection (1) may be admitted on an issue regarding a mental condition on which the defendant has introduced evidence.    Enacted by Chapter 11, 2003 General Session
UT Code § 77-16b-101 (2021)
2021 Utah Code|Title 77 - Utah Code of Criminal Procedure|Chapter 16b - Involuntary Feeding and Hydration of Inmates|Section 101 - Title.

77-16b-101. Title.  This chapter is known as the "Involuntary Feeding and Hydration of Inmates."  Enacted by Chapter 355, 2012 General Session
UT Code § 77-16b-102 (2021)
2021 Utah Code|Title 77 - Utah Code of Criminal Procedure|Chapter 16b - Involuntary Feeding and Hydration of Inmates|Section 102 - Definitions.

 Effective 9/1/2021  77-16b-102. Definitions.  As used in this chapter:  (1) "Correctional facility" means:   (a) a county jail;     (b) a secure correctional facility as defined by Section 64-13-1; or     (c) a secure care facility as defined in Section 80-1-102.       (2) "Correctional facility administrator" means:   (a) a county sheriff in charge of a county jail;     (b) a designee of the executive director of the Utah Department of Corrections; or     (c) a designee of the director of the Division of Juvenile Justice Services.       (3) "Medical supervision" means under the direction of a licensed physician, physician assistant, or nurse practitioner.     (4) "Mental health therapist" means the same as that term is defined in Section 58-60-102.     (5) "Prisoner" means:   (a) any individual who is a pretrial detainee or who has been committed to the custody of a sheriff or the Utah Department of Corrections, and who is physically in a correctional facility; and     (b) any individual who is 18 years old or older and younger than 21 years old, and who has been committed to the custody of the Division of Juvenile Justice Services.      Amended by Chapter 262, 2021 General Session