reglab/housing_qa huggingface dataset:
MI Comp L § 722.685 (2021)
2021 Michigan Compiled Laws|Chapter 722 - Children|Act 33 of 1978 - Disseminating, Exhibiting, or Displaying Sexually Explicit Matter to Minors (722.671 - 722.693)|33-1978-II - Part II Ultra-Violent Explicit Video Games (722.685...722.693)|Section 722.685 - Legislative Findings.

722.685 Legislative findings.Sec. 15.  In light of section 51 of article IV of the state constitution of 1963, which directs that "The public health and general welfare of the people of the state are hereby declared to be matters of primary public concern. The legislature shall pass suitable laws for the protection and promotion of the public health.", and after hearing from expert witnesses and law enforcement officials, considering the testimony of expert witnesses before other legislative bodies, and reviewing dozens of studies and metastudies of hundreds of studies, the legislature finds all of the following:  (a) Published research overwhelmingly finds that ultra-violent explicit video games are harmful to minors because minors who play ultra-violent explicit video games are consistently more likely to exhibit violent, asocial, or aggressive behavior and have feelings of aggression.  (b) Spokespersons for not less than 6 major national health associations have concluded and testified that after reviewing more than 1,000 studies, the studies "point overwhelmingly to a causal connection between media violence and aggressive behavior in some children", concluding that the effects of media violence on minors "are measurable and long-lasting".  (c) Law enforcement officers testified that recent statewide targeted enforcement efforts reveal that minors are capable of purchasing, and do purchase, ultra-violent explicit video games.  (d) Law enforcement officers testified about cases of minors acting out ultra-violent explicit video game behaviors by victimizing other citizens.  (e) The state has a legitimate and compelling interest in safeguarding both the physical and psychological well-being of minors.  (f) The state has a legitimate and compelling interest in preventing violent, aggressive, and asocial behavior from manifesting itself in minors.  (g) The state has a legitimate and compelling interest in directly and substantially alleviating the real-life harms perpetrated by minors who play ultra-violent explicit video games. History: Add. 2005, Act 108, Eff. Dec. 1, 2005 Constitutionality: In Entertainment Software Association v Granholm, F Supp (2006), the United States district court for the Eastern District of Michigan, Southern Division, permanently enjoined enforcement of an act regulating sexually explicit and ultra-violent video games as violating free speech rights and the due process requirement that a law be sufficiently definite to provide notice of the conduct prohibited that are granted in the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution.
MI Comp L § 722.687 (2021)
2021 Michigan Compiled Laws|Chapter 722 - Children|Act 33 of 1978 - Disseminating, Exhibiting, or Displaying Sexually Explicit Matter to Minors (722.671 - 722.693)|33-1978-II - Part II Ultra-Violent Explicit Video Games (722.685...722.693)|Section 722.687 - Dissemination of Ultra-Violent Explicit Video Game to Minor; Prohibition; Violation; Penalties.

722.687 Dissemination of ultra-violent explicit video game to minor; prohibition; violation; penalties.Sec. 17.  (1) A person shall not knowingly disseminate to a minor an ultra-violent explicit video game that is harmful to minors. Except as provided in subsections (2) and (3), a person who violates this subsection is responsible for a state civil infraction and may be ordered to pay a civil fine of not more than $5,000.00.  (2) A person who violates subsection (1) and who has 1 prior determination of responsibility under this section is responsible for a state civil infraction and may be ordered to pay a civil fine of not more than $15,000.00.  (3) A person who violates subsection (1) and who has 2 or more prior determinations of responsibility under this section is responsible for a state civil infraction and may be ordered to pay a civil fine of not more than $40,000.00. In imposing a fine under this subsection, the court shall consider the scope of the defendant's commercial activity in disseminating ultra-violent explicit video games to minors. History: Add. 2005, Act 108, Eff. Dec. 1, 2005 Constitutionality: In Entertainment Software Association v Granholm, F Supp (2006), the United States district court for the Eastern District of Michigan, Southern Division, permanently enjoined enforcement of an act regulating sexually explicit and ultra-violent video games as violating free speech rights and the due process requirement that a law be sufficiently definite to provide notice of the conduct prohibited that are granted in the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution.
MI Comp L § 722.688 (2021)
2021 Michigan Compiled Laws|Chapter 722 - Children|Act 33 of 1978 - Disseminating, Exhibiting, or Displaying Sexually Explicit Matter to Minors (722.671 - 722.693)|33-1978-II - Part II Ultra-Violent Explicit Video Games (722.685...722.693)|Section 722.688 - Exceptions.

722.688 Exceptions.Sec. 18.  Section 17 does not apply to the dissemination of an ultra-violent explicit video game to a minor by any of the following:  (a) A parent or guardian who disseminates an ultra-violent explicit video game to his or her child or ward.  (b) An immediate family member of the minor who disseminates an ultra-violent explicit video game to the minor in the immediate family member's residence or the minor's residence.  (c) An individual who disseminates an ultra-violent video game to a minor who is a guest in the individual's residence.  (d) An individual who disseminates an ultra-violent explicit video game for a legitimate medical, scientific, governmental, or judicial purpose. History: Add. 2005, Act 108, Eff. Dec. 1, 2005 Constitutionality: In Entertainment Software Association v Granholm, F Supp (2006), the United States district court for the Eastern District of Michigan, Southern Division, permanently enjoined enforcement of an act regulating sexually explicit and ultra-violent video games as violating free speech rights and the due process requirement that a law be sufficiently definite to provide notice of the conduct prohibited that are granted in the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution.
MI Comp L § 722.689 (2021)
2021 Michigan Compiled Laws|Chapter 722 - Children|Act 33 of 1978 - Disseminating, Exhibiting, or Displaying Sexually Explicit Matter to Minors (722.671 - 722.693)|33-1978-II - Part II Ultra-Violent Explicit Video Games (722.685...722.693)|Section 722.689 - False Representation as to Age or Status as Parent or Guardian; Violation; Penalty.

722.689 False representation as to age or status as parent or guardian; violation; penalty.Sec. 19.  (1) A person shall not knowingly make a false representation that he or she is the parent or guardian of a minor, or that a minor is 17 years of age or older, with the intent to facilitate the dissemination to the minor of an ultra-violent explicit video game that is harmful to minors. A person knowingly makes a false representation as to the age of a minor or as to the status of being the parent or guardian of a minor if the person either is aware that the representation is false or recklessly disregards a substantial risk that the representation is false.  (2) A person who violates subsection (1) is guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by imprisonment for not more than 93 days or a fine of not more than $15,000.00, or both. History: Add. 2005, Act 108, Eff. Dec. 1, 2005 Constitutionality: In Entertainment Software Association v Granholm, F Supp (2006), the United States district court for the Eastern District of Michigan, Southern Division, permanently enjoined enforcement of an act regulating sexually explicit and ultra-violent video games as violating free speech rights and the due process requirement that a law be sufficiently definite to provide notice of the conduct prohibited that are granted in the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution.
MI Comp L § 722.690 (2021)
2021 Michigan Compiled Laws|Chapter 722 - Children|Act 33 of 1978 - Disseminating, Exhibiting, or Displaying Sexually Explicit Matter to Minors (722.671 - 722.693)|33-1978-II - Part II Ultra-Violent Explicit Video Games (722.685...722.693)|Section 722.690 - Manager of Business Enterprise Renting or Selling Ultra-Violent Explicit Video Games; Permitting Minor to Play or View Prohibited; Violation; Penalty.

722.690 Manager of business enterprise renting or selling ultra-violent explicit video games; permitting minor to play or view prohibited; violation; penalty.Sec. 20.  A person who possesses managerial responsibility for a business enterprise renting or selling ultra-violent explicit video games that are harmful to minors shall not knowingly permit a minor who is not accompanied by a parent or guardian to play or view the playing of an ultra-violent explicit video game that is harmful to minors. A person who violates this section is guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by imprisonment for not more than 93 days or a fine of not more than $25,000.00, or both. History: Add. 2005, Act 108, Eff. Dec. 1, 2005 Constitutionality: In Entertainment Software Association v Granholm, F Supp (2006), the United States district court for the Eastern District of Michigan, Southern Division, permanently enjoined enforcement of an act regulating sexually explicit and ultra-violent video games as violating free speech rights and the due process requirement that a law be sufficiently definite to provide notice of the conduct prohibited that are granted in the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution.
MI Comp L § 722.691 (2021)
2021 Michigan Compiled Laws|Chapter 722 - Children|Act 33 of 1978 - Disseminating, Exhibiting, or Displaying Sexually Explicit Matter to Minors (722.671 - 722.693)|33-1978-II - Part II Ultra-Violent Explicit Video Games (722.685...722.693)|Section 722.691 - Knowingly Disseminating Ultra-Violent Explicit Video Game.

722.691 Knowingly disseminating ultra-violent explicit video game.Sec. 21.  (1) A person knowingly disseminates an ultra-violent explicit video game to a minor if the person knows both the nature of the video game and the status of the minor to whom the video game is disseminated.  (2) A person knows the nature of the ultra-violent explicit video game if the person either is aware of its character and content or recklessly disregards circumstances suggesting its character and content.  (3) A person knows the status of a minor if the person either is aware that the person to whom the dissemination is made is a minor or recklessly disregards a substantial risk that the person to whom the dissemination is made is a minor. History: Add. 2005, Act 108, Eff. Dec. 1, 2005 Constitutionality: In Entertainment Software Association v Granholm, F Supp (2006), the United States district court for the Eastern District of Michigan, Southern Division, permanently enjoined enforcement of an act regulating sexually explicit and ultra-violent video games as violating free speech rights and the due process requirement that a law be sufficiently definite to provide notice of the conduct prohibited that are granted in the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution.
MI Comp L § 722.692 (2021)
2021 Michigan Compiled Laws|Chapter 722 - Children|Act 33 of 1978 - Disseminating, Exhibiting, or Displaying Sexually Explicit Matter to Minors (722.671 - 722.693)|33-1978-II - Part II Ultra-Violent Explicit Video Games (722.685...722.693)|Section 722.692 - Violation Arising From Same Transaction.

722.692 Violation arising from same transaction.Sec. 22.  A conviction, sentence, or determination of responsibility for a violation of this part does not preclude a conviction, sentence, or determination of responsibility for a violation of any other law of this state arising from the same transaction. History: Add. 2005, Act 108, Eff. Dec. 1, 2005 Constitutionality: In Entertainment Software Association v Granholm, F Supp (2006), the United States district court for the Eastern District of Michigan, Southern Division, permanently enjoined enforcement of an act regulating sexually explicit and ultra-violent video games as violating free speech rights and the due process requirement that a law be sufficiently definite to provide notice of the conduct prohibited that are granted in the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution.
MI Comp L § 722.693 (2021)
2021 Michigan Compiled Laws|Chapter 722 - Children|Act 33 of 1978 - Disseminating, Exhibiting, or Displaying Sexually Explicit Matter to Minors (722.671 - 722.693)|33-1978-II - Part II Ultra-Violent Explicit Video Games (722.685...722.693)|Section 722.693 - Good Faith as Defense.

722.693 Good faith as defense.Sec. 23.  (1) It is an affirmative defense to an alleged violation under this part that the person acted in good faith. Except as provided in subsection (2), good faith exists if at the time the alleged violation occurs all of the following conditions are satisfied:  (a) The minor shows the person identification that appears to be valid and that contains a photograph and a date of birth purporting to show that the minor is 17 years of age or older, or the service terms of the internet provider of a seller or rental enterprise that sells or rents ultra-violent explicit video games over the internet require a purchaser or renter to be 17 years of age or older if all of the following conditions are met:  (i) The ultra-violent explicit video game is purchased or rented over the internet.  (ii) The ultra-violent explicit video game is sent to the purchaser's or renter's home or place of residence or otherwise made directly available through the internet to the purchaser or renter.  (iii) The purchaser or renter of the ultra-violent explicit video game uses a credit card to purchase or rent the ultra-violent explicit video game.  (b) The person does not have independent knowledge that the minor is under 17 years of age.  (c) Relying upon information described in subdivisions (a) and (b), the person complies with a rating system established by the pertinent entertainment industry that does not conflict with this part.  (2) If the person possesses managerial responsibility for a business enterprise, good faith exists if at the time the alleged violation occurs the business enterprise satisfies all of the following conditions:  (a) The business enterprise has in existence a policy that its employees are required to comply with a rating system established by the pertinent entertainment industry that does not conflict with this part.  (b) The business enterprise trains its employees to follow the policy described in subdivision (a).  (c) The business enterprise enforces the policy described in subdivision (a). History: Add. 2005, Act 108, Eff. Dec. 1, 2005 Constitutionality: In Entertainment Software Association v Granholm, F Supp (2006), the United States district court for the Eastern District of Michigan, Southern Division, permanently enjoined enforcement of an act regulating sexually explicit and ultra-violent video games as violating free speech rights and the due process requirement that a law be sufficiently definite to provide notice of the conduct prohibited that are granted in the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution.
MI Comp L § 722.1101 (2021)
2021 Michigan Compiled Laws|Chapter 722 - Children|Act 195 of 2001 - Uniform Child-Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act (722.1101 - 722.1406)|Article 1 - General Provisions (722.1101...722.1112)|Section 722.1101 - Short Title.

722.1101 Short title. Sec. 101.  This act shall be known and may be cited as the "uniform child-custody jurisdiction and enforcement act". History: 2001, Act 195, Eff. Apr. 1, 2002
MI Comp L § 722.1103 (2021)
2021 Michigan Compiled Laws|Chapter 722 - Children|Act 195 of 2001 - Uniform Child-Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act (722.1101 - 722.1406)|Article 1 - General Provisions (722.1101...722.1112)|Section 722.1103 - Scope of Act; Limitation.

722.1103 Scope of act; limitation. Sec. 103.  This act does not govern an adoption proceeding or a proceeding pertaining to the authorization of emergency medical care for a child. History: 2001, Act 195, Eff. Apr. 1, 2002
MI Comp L § 722.1104 (2021)
2021 Michigan Compiled Laws|Chapter 722 - Children|Act 195 of 2001 - Uniform Child-Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act (722.1101 - 722.1406)|Article 1 - General Provisions (722.1101...722.1112)|Section 722.1104 - Proceeding Pertaining to Indian Child.

722.1104 Proceeding pertaining to Indian child. Sec. 104.  (1) A child-custody proceeding that pertains to an Indian child as defined in the Indian child welfare act of 1978, Public Law 95-608, 25 U.S.C. 1901 to 1903, 1911 to 1923, 1931 to 1934, 1951 to 1952, and 1961 to 1963, is not subject to this act to the extent that the proceeding is governed by the Indian child welfare act of 1978, Public Law 95-608, 25 U.S.C. 1901 to 1903, 1911 to 1923, 1931 to 1934, 1951 to 1952, and 1961 to 1963.  (2) A court of this state shall treat a tribe as a state of the United States for the purposes of articles 1 and 2.  (3) A child-custody determination made by a tribe under factual circumstances in substantial conformity with the jurisdictional standards of this act must be recognized and enforced under article 3. History: 2001, Act 195, Eff. Apr. 1, 2002
MI Comp L § 722.1105 (2021)
2021 Michigan Compiled Laws|Chapter 722 - Children|Act 195 of 2001 - Uniform Child-Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act (722.1101 - 722.1406)|Article 1 - General Provisions (722.1101...722.1112)|Section 722.1105 - Child-Custody Law or Determination of Foreign Country.

722.1105 Child-custody law or determination of foreign country. Sec. 105.  (1) A court of this state shall treat a foreign country as a state of the United States for the purposes of applying articles 1 and 2.  (2) Except as otherwise provided in subsection (3), a child-custody determination made in a foreign country under factual circumstances in substantial conformity with the jurisdictional standards of this act must be recognized and enforced under article 3.  (3) A court of this state need not apply this act if the child-custody law of a foreign country violates fundamental principles of human rights. History: 2001, Act 195, Eff. Apr. 1, 2002
MI Comp L § 722.1106 (2021)
2021 Michigan Compiled Laws|Chapter 722 - Children|Act 195 of 2001 - Uniform Child-Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act (722.1101 - 722.1406)|Article 1 - General Provisions (722.1101...722.1112)|Section 722.1106 - Child-Custody Determination of This State.

722.1106 Child-custody determination of this state. Sec. 106.  A child-custody determination made by a court of this state that had jurisdiction under this act binds all persons who have been served in accordance with the laws of this state or notified in accordance with section 108 or who have submitted to the jurisdiction of the court, and who have been given an opportunity to be heard. As to those persons, the child-custody determination is conclusive as to all decided issues of law and fact except to the extent the child-custody determination is modified. History: 2001, Act 195, Eff. Apr. 1, 2002
MI Comp L § 722.1107 (2021)
2021 Michigan Compiled Laws|Chapter 722 - Children|Act 195 of 2001 - Uniform Child-Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act (722.1101 - 722.1406)|Article 1 - General Provisions (722.1101...722.1112)|Section 722.1107 - Jurisdiction; Question; Priority.

722.1107 Jurisdiction; question; priority. Sec. 107.  If a question of existence or exercise of jurisdiction under this act is raised in a child-custody proceeding, upon request of a party, the question must be given priority on the court calendar and handled expeditiously. History: 2001, Act 195, Eff. Apr. 1, 2002
MI Comp L § 722.1108 (2021)
2021 Michigan Compiled Laws|Chapter 722 - Children|Act 195 of 2001 - Uniform Child-Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act (722.1101 - 722.1406)|Article 1 - General Provisions (722.1101...722.1112)|Section 722.1108 - Notice; Manner; Proof of Service; Notice Not Required.

722.1108 Notice; manner; proof of service; notice not required. Sec. 108.  (1) Notice required for the exercise of jurisdiction when a person is outside this state may be given in a manner prescribed by the law of this state for service of process or by the law of the state in which the service is made. Notice must be given in a manner reasonably calculated to give actual notice, but may be by publication if other means are not effective.  (2) Proof of service may be made in the manner prescribed by the law of this state or by the law of the state in which the service is made.  (3) Notice is not required for the exercise of jurisdiction with respect to a person who submits to the jurisdiction of the court. History: 2001, Act 195, Eff. Apr. 1, 2002
MI Comp L § 722.1109 (2021)
2021 Michigan Compiled Laws|Chapter 722 - Children|Act 195 of 2001 - Uniform Child-Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act (722.1101 - 722.1406)|Article 1 - General Provisions (722.1101...722.1112)|Section 722.1109 - Personal Jurisdiction.

722.1109 Personal jurisdiction. Sec. 109.  (1) A party to a child-custody proceeding who is not subject to personal jurisdiction in this state and is a responding party under article 2, a party in a proceeding to modify a child-custody determination under article 2, or a petitioner in a proceeding to enforce or register a child-custody determination under article 3 may appear and participate in the proceeding without submitting to personal jurisdiction over the party for another proceeding or purpose.  (2) A party is not subject to personal jurisdiction in this state solely by being physically present for the purpose of participating in a proceeding under this act. If a party is subject to personal jurisdiction in this state on a basis other than physical presence, the party may be served with process in this state. If a party present in this state is subject to the jurisdiction of another state, service of process allowable under the law of that state may be accomplished in this state.  (3) The immunity granted by subsection (1) does not extend to civil litigation based on acts unrelated to the participation in a proceeding under this act committed by an individual while present in this state. History: 2001, Act 195, Eff. Apr. 1, 2002