reglab/housing_qa huggingface dataset:
IN Code § 35-33-10-5 (2021)
2021 Indiana Code|Title 35. Criminal Law and Procedure|Article 33. Preliminary Proceedings|Chapter 10. Securing Attendance of Defendants and Uniform Extradition Act|35-33-10-5. Defendants Confined in Federal Institutions

Sec. 5. Securing Attendance of Defendant Confined in Federal Institutions. (1) A defendant against whom a criminal action is pending in a court of record of this state, and who is confined in a federal prison or other institution either within or outside this state, may, with the consent of the attorney general of the United States, be produced in such court for the purpose of criminal prosecution, pursuant to the provisions of:(a) Section four thousand eighty-five of title eighteen of the United States Code as in effect on July 26, 1973; or(b) subsection 2 of this section.(2) When such a defendant is in federal custody as specified in subsection 1, a court in which the criminal action against such defendant is pending, may, upon application of the prosecuting attorney of such county, issue a certificate, known as a writ of habeas corpus ad prosequendum, addressed to the attorney general of the United States, certifying that such defendant has been charged by indictment or information filed against him in the specified court with the offense or offenses alleged therein, and that attendance of the defendant in such court for the purpose of criminal prosecution thereon is necessary in the interest of justice and requesting the attorney general of the United States to cause such defendant to be produced in such court, under custody of a federal public servant, upon a designated date and for a period of time necessary to complete the prosecution. Upon issuing such a certificate, the court may deliver it, or cause or authorize it to be delivered, together with a certified copy of the indictment or information upon which it is based, to the attorney general of the United States or to his representative authorized to entertain the request.As added by Acts 1981, P.L.298, SEC.2.
IN Code § 35-33-10-6 (2021)
2021 Indiana Code|Title 35. Criminal Law and Procedure|Article 33. Preliminary Proceedings|Chapter 10. Securing Attendance of Defendants and Uniform Extradition Act|35-33-10-6. Defendants Outside United States

Sec. 6. Securing Attendance of Defendants Who Are Outside The United States. (1) When a criminal action for a crime committed in this state is pending in a court of this state with jurisdiction over the crime against a defendant who is in a foreign country with which the United States has an extradition treaty, and when the indictment or information charges a crime which is specified in such treaty as an extraditable one, the prosecuting attorney of the county in which such crime was allegedly committed may make an application to the governor, requesting him to make an application to the president of the United States to institute extradition proceedings for the return of the defendant to this country and state for the purpose of prosecution of such action. The prosecuting attorney's application must comply with any rules, regulations and guidelines established by the governor for such applications and must be accompanied by all the documents required by such rules, regulations and guidelines.(2) Upon receipt of the prosecuting attorney's application, the governor if satisfied that the defendant is in the foreign country in question, that the crime charged is an extraditable one pursuant to the treaty in question, and that there are no factors or impediments which in law preclude such an extradition, may in his discretion make an application, addressed to the secretary of state of the United States, requesting that the president of the United States institute extradition proceedings for the return of the defendant from such foreign country. The governor's application must comply with any rules, regulations and guidelines established by the secretary of state for such applications and must be accompanied by all the documents required by such rules, regulations and guidelines.(3) If the governor's application is granted and the extradition is achieved or attempted, all expenses incurred therein must be borne by the county from which the application emanated.(4) The provisions of this section apply equally to extradition or attempted extradition of a person who is a fugitive following the entry of a judgment of conviction against him in a criminal court of this state.As added by Acts 1981, P.L.298, SEC.2.
IN Code § 35-33-10-7 (2021)
2021 Indiana Code|Title 35. Criminal Law and Procedure|Article 33. Preliminary Proceedings|Chapter 10. Securing Attendance of Defendants and Uniform Extradition Act|35-33-10-7. Corporate Defendants

Sec. 7. Securing Attendance of Corporate Defendants. (1) The court attendance of a corporation for purposes of commencing or prosecuting a criminal action against it may be accomplished by the issuance and service of a summons.(a) A corporation shall be deemed in attendance for purposes of commencing or prosecuting a criminal action against it whenever an officer, director or counsel for such corporation is present. If such officer, director or counsel fails or refuses to appear, the court shall proceed with trial and judgment.As added by Acts 1981, P.L.298, SEC.2.
IN Code § 35-33-11-1 (2021)
2021 Indiana Code|Title 35. Criminal Law and Procedure|Article 33. Preliminary Proceedings|Chapter 11. Emergency Transfer of Certain Jail Inmates|35-33-11-1. Inmate in County Jail in Imminent Danger of Serious Bodily Injury or Death or Represents Substantial Threat to Safety of Others

Sec. 1. Upon motion by the:(1) sheriff;(2) prosecuting attorney;(3) defendant or his counsel;(4) attorney general; or(5) court;alleging that an inmate in a county jail awaiting trial is in danger of serious bodily injury or death or represents a substantial threat to the safety of others, the court shall determine whether the inmate is in imminent danger of serious bodily injury or death, or represents a substantial threat to the safety of others. If the court finds that the inmate is in danger of serious bodily injury or death or represents a substantial threat to the safety of others, it shall order the sheriff to transfer the inmate to another county jail or to a facility of the department of correction designated by the commissioner of the department as suitable for the confinement of that prisoner and provided that space is available. For the purpose of this chapter, an inmate is not considered in danger of serious bodily injury or death due to an illness or other medical condition.As added by Acts 1981, P.L.298, SEC.2.
IN Code § 35-33-11-2 (2021)
2021 Indiana Code|Title 35. Criminal Law and Procedure|Article 33. Preliminary Proceedings|Chapter 11. Emergency Transfer of Certain Jail Inmates|35-33-11-2. Posttransfer Hearing

Sec. 2. The inmate or receiving authority is entitled to a posttransfer hearing upon request. The inmate may refuse a transfer if the only issue is his personal safety.As added by Acts 1981, P.L.298, SEC.2.
IN Code § 35-33-11-3 (2021)
2021 Indiana Code|Title 35. Criminal Law and Procedure|Article 33. Preliminary Proceedings|Chapter 11. Emergency Transfer of Certain Jail Inmates|35-33-11-3. Overcrowding or Inadequacy of Local Penal Facility

Sec. 3. Upon petition by the sheriff alleging that:(1) the local penal facility is overcrowded or otherwise physically inadequate to house inmates; and(2) another sheriff or the commissioner of the department of correction has agreed to accept custody of inmates from the sheriff;the court may order inmates transferred to the custody of the person who has agreed to accept custody. Whenever a transfer order is necessary under this section, only inmates serving a sentence after conviction for a crime may be transferred, unless the overcrowding or inadequacy of the facility also requires transfer of inmates awaiting trial or sentencing.As added by Acts 1981, P.L.298, SEC.2.
IN Code § 35-33-11-4 (2021)
2021 Indiana Code|Title 35. Criminal Law and Procedure|Article 33. Preliminary Proceedings|Chapter 11. Emergency Transfer of Certain Jail Inmates|35-33-11-4. Return to County Jail

Sec. 4. Whenever the court finds that the circumstances which necessitated a transfer under this chapter no longer exist, it shall order the sheriff to return the inmate to the county jail from which he was transferred.As added by Acts 1981, P.L.298, SEC.2.
IN Code § 35-33-11-5 (2021)
2021 Indiana Code|Title 35. Criminal Law and Procedure|Article 33. Preliminary Proceedings|Chapter 11. Emergency Transfer of Certain Jail Inmates|35-33-11-5. Transportation to and From Facilities; Payment of Costs by County

Sec. 5. When an inmate is transferred under this chapter, the sheriff of the county from which the inmate is transferred shall be responsible for transporting the inmates to and from the other facility. If the sheriff is unable to adequately protect the inmate during the transfer, the sheriff or the court may request assistance from any other law enforcement agency. The county which transfers an inmate shall pay:(1) a per diem of the average daily cost of housing a prisoner at the facility to which the inmate has been assigned; and(2) any additional costs reasonably necessary to maintain the health and welfare of a transferred inmate.As added by Acts 1981, P.L.298, SEC.2.
IN Code § 35-33-11-6 (2021)
2021 Indiana Code|Title 35. Criminal Law and Procedure|Article 33. Preliminary Proceedings|Chapter 11. Emergency Transfer of Certain Jail Inmates|35-33-11-6. Delivery of Data With Prisoner

Sec. 6. When an inmate is transferred under this chapter, the sheriff of the county from which the inmate is received shall deliver with the prisoner a certified copy of the order, a current medical report, if available, and other data relating the proper medical care and classification of the inmate that is established as necessary by written policy of the department of correction or the receiving institution, pertaining to the health, safety, and proper confinement of safekeepers.As added by Acts 1981, P.L.298, SEC.2.
IN Code § 35-33-11-7 (2021)
2021 Indiana Code|Title 35. Criminal Law and Procedure|Article 33. Preliminary Proceedings|Chapter 11. Emergency Transfer of Certain Jail Inmates|35-33-11-7. Notice of Subsequent Transfer

Sec. 7. The department of correction will notify the sheriff of the county and judge of the court from which the inmate was transferred of any subsequent transfer of a prisoner within the department of correction necessary to assure the purposes of the original transfer.As added by Acts 1981, P.L.298, SEC.2.
IN Code § 35-33-11-8 (2021)
2021 Indiana Code|Title 35. Criminal Law and Procedure|Article 33. Preliminary Proceedings|Chapter 11. Emergency Transfer of Certain Jail Inmates|35-33-11-8. Assignment of Prisoners Serving Sentence to Program or Work

Sec. 8. Prisoners serving a sentence after a conviction and transfer to the department or other receiving institution may be assigned to any program or work consistent with procedures and requirements for other prisoners committed to the department or other receiving institution.As added by Acts 1981, P.L.298, SEC.2.
IN Code § 35-33-11-9 (2021)
2021 Indiana Code|Title 35. Criminal Law and Procedure|Article 33. Preliminary Proceedings|Chapter 11. Emergency Transfer of Certain Jail Inmates|35-33-11-9. Assignment of Prisoners Awaiting Trial to Program or Work

Sec. 9. Prisoners awaiting trial may be allowed to work or be assigned to programs consistent with the rights regarding prisoners awaiting trial.As added by Acts 1981, P.L.298, SEC.2.
IN Code § 35-33-11-10 (2021)
2021 Indiana Code|Title 35. Criminal Law and Procedure|Article 33. Preliminary Proceedings|Chapter 11. Emergency Transfer of Certain Jail Inmates|35-33-11-10. Discipline of Prisoners Awaiting Trial

Sec. 10. The department of correction or other receiving sheriff may discipline prisoners awaiting trial as authorized under IC 35-50.As added by Acts 1981, P.L.298, SEC.2.
IN Code § 35-33-14-1 (2021)
2021 Indiana Code|Title 35. Criminal Law and Procedure|Article 33. Preliminary Proceedings|Chapter 14. County Extradition and Sheriff's Assistance Fund|35-33-14-1. Establishment

Sec. 1. There is established in each county a county extradition and sheriff's assistance fund.As added by P.L.355-1989(ss), SEC.15. Amended by P.L.42-2013, SEC.2.
IN Code § 35-33-14-2 (2021)
2021 Indiana Code|Title 35. Criminal Law and Procedure|Article 33. Preliminary Proceedings|Chapter 14. County Extradition and Sheriff's Assistance Fund|35-33-14-2. Purpose

Sec. 2. The county extradition and sheriff's assistance fund is established for the following purposes:(1) Providing funding to offset the costs of extraditing criminal defendants.(2) Providing funding to train and equip law enforcement officers in the county.(3) Providing funding to offset other costs incurred by the county sheriff's department in providing law enforcement services.Money in the fund may not be used for any other purpose.As added by P.L.355-1989(ss), SEC.15. Amended by P.L.42-2013, SEC.3.
IN Code § 35-33-14-3 (2021)
2021 Indiana Code|Title 35. Criminal Law and Procedure|Article 33. Preliminary Proceedings|Chapter 14. County Extradition and Sheriff's Assistance Fund|35-33-14-3. Administration

Sec. 3. The county auditor shall administer the fund.As added by P.L.355-1989(ss), SEC.15.
IN Code § 35-33-14-4 (2021)
2021 Indiana Code|Title 35. Criminal Law and Procedure|Article 33. Preliminary Proceedings|Chapter 14. County Extradition and Sheriff's Assistance Fund|35-33-14-4. Reversion of Fund Money

Sec. 4. Money in the fund at the end of a particular calendar year does not revert to any other fund, but remains in the county extradition and sheriff's assistance fund.As added by P.L.355-1989(ss), SEC.15. Amended by P.L.168-2014, SEC.53.
IN Code § 35-33-14-5 (2021)
2021 Indiana Code|Title 35. Criminal Law and Procedure|Article 33. Preliminary Proceedings|Chapter 14. County Extradition and Sheriff's Assistance Fund|35-33-14-5. Composition of Fund

Sec. 5. The fund consists of the portion of late surrender fees deposited in the fund under IC 27-10-2-12(i).As added by P.L.355-1989(ss), SEC.15.
IN Code § 35-33.5-2-1 (2021)
2021 Indiana Code|Title 35. Criminal Law and Procedure|Article 33.5. Interception of Telephonic or Telegraphic Communications|Chapter 2. Applications, Procedures, and Reports|35-33.5-2-1. Application for Warrant by Prosecuting or Designated Deputy Prosecuting Attorney; Coapplicant; Interception Equipment Under Control of State Police; Reimbursement to State Police

Sec. 1. (a) A prosecuting attorney or, if the prosecuting attorney is unavailable, a chief deputy prosecuting attorney specifically authorized by the prosecuting attorney, may submit an application for a warrant or an extension to a circuit or superior court where:(1) the county that the prosecuting attorney represents is located; and(2) the communication subject to the warrant is anticipated to be sent or received.The prosecuting attorney or authorized chief deputy prosecuting attorney may not delegate the responsibility of applying for a warrant or an extension to another deputy prosecuting attorney.(b) One (1) of the following persons must serve as a coapplicant for a warrant or an extension under subsection (a):(1) The superintendent of the state police department.(2) The police chief of a consolidated city where the communication subject to the warrant is anticipated to be sent or received.(3) The sheriff of the county containing a consolidated city where the communication subject to the warrant is anticipated to be sent or received.(c) Only the state police department may install equipment used to intercept an electronic communication under this chapter.(d) The state police department may:(1) operate or monitor equipment used to intercept an electronic communication; or(2) if the interception of an electronic communication is performed on behalf of another law enforcement agency, permit the law enforcement agency to operate or monitor the equipment under the supervision of the department.(e) The superintendent of the state police department may terminate an interception under this chapter if the superintendent of the state police department determines that there is probable cause to believe that the allegations concerning the offense that are the basis of the interception are without merit. If an interception of an electronic communication is terminated under this subsection, the law enforcement agency that is the co-applicant for the interception shall reimburse the state police department for the department's expenses incurred in connection with the application for interception, including the costs of removing equipment related to the interception.(f) If the interception of an electronic communication is performed on behalf of another law enforcement agency, the law enforcement agency shall reimburse the department for the department's expenses in connection with the installation, operation, and maintenance of equipment used to intercept an electronic communication.As added by P.L.161-1990, SEC.3. Amended by P.L.105-2007, SEC.6.
IN Code § 35-33.5-2-2 (2021)
2021 Indiana Code|Title 35. Criminal Law and Procedure|Article 33.5. Interception of Telephonic or Telegraphic Communications|Chapter 2. Applications, Procedures, and Reports|35-33.5-2-2. Application or Extension in Writing and Upon Oath of Affirmation; Information Required

Sec. 2. (a) Except as provided in section 3.5 of this chapter, an application for a warrant or extension must be made in writing and upon oath or affirmation. Each application must also include the following:(1) The identity of the persons submitting the application.(2) An affidavit setting forth the facts relied upon by an applicant to show why a warrant should be issued or an extension granted, including the following:(A) Facts establishing probable cause for the belief that a designated offense allegedly has been, is being, or may be committed.(B) A description of the nature and location of the facility, place, or device from which the communication is to be intercepted.(C) The identity, if known, of the person allegedly committing the designated offense whose communication is to be intercepted.(D) A description of the type of communication to be intercepted.(3) A statement specifying that other investigative procedures:(A) have been tried and failed; or(B) may not succeed or are too dangerous to attempt.(4) A statement of the duration necessary for the interception. However, if the applicant requests that the authorization for interception not automatically terminate once the described type of communication is initially obtained, the application must also include a description of facts supporting the belief that additional communications of the same type will occur.(5) A statement of facts and any action taken by the court concerning any previous application for a warrant or an extension that:(A) has been made to a court under this article;(B) sought to obtain communications from any of the same persons, places, or facilities as the current application; and(C) is known to exist by the persons making the current application.(6) If it is reasonably necessary to make a secret entry upon private property to install an interception device, a statement describing the following:(A) The private property.(B) Who owns and who occupies the private property.(C) The reasons necessitating secret entry.(b) In addition to the information required in subsection (a), if an application is for an extension, the application must contain a statement setting forth the results obtained from the original warrant or a reasonable explanation of the failure to obtain results under the original warrant.(c) The court may require an applicant to furnish additional testimony or evidence in support of an application.As added by P.L.161-1990, SEC.3. Amended by P.L.105-2007, SEC.7.
IN Code § 35-33.5-2-3 (2021)
2021 Indiana Code|Title 35. Criminal Law and Procedure|Article 33.5. Interception of Telephonic or Telegraphic Communications|Chapter 2. Applications, Procedures, and Reports|35-33.5-2-3. Allegations of Fact; Basis; Information Required; Supporting Affidavits

Sec. 3. (a) Allegations of fact in an application for a warrant submitted under this chapter may be based either upon the personal knowledge of the applicant or upon information and belief.(b) If the applicant personally knows the facts alleged, the applicant shall state that the affidavit is based upon personal knowledge.(c) If the allegations of fact are derived in whole or in part from the statements of persons other than the applicant:(1) the sources of the applicant's information and belief must be either disclosed or described;(2) the application must contain facts establishing the existence and reliability of:(A) any informant; and(B) information supplied by any informant; and(3) the basis of an informant's knowledge or belief must be disclosed, as far as possible.(d) If the applicant's information and belief is derived from:(1) tangible evidence; or(2) recorded oral evidence;the applicant shall attach to the application a copy or detailed description of the tangible evidence or recorded oral evidence.(e) Affidavits of persons other than the applicant may be attached to the application if the affidavits of other persons tend to support any fact or conclusion alleged in the application. An affidavit attached to the application under this subsection may be based either on personal knowledge of the affiant or on information and belief. However, if the attached affidavit is based on information and belief the affiant shall state the source of, and the reason for, the information and belief.As added by P.L.161-1990, SEC.3.
IN Code § 35-33.5-2-4 (2021)
2021 Indiana Code|Title 35. Criminal Law and Procedure|Article 33.5. Interception of Telephonic or Telegraphic Communications|Chapter 2. Applications, Procedures, and Reports|35-33.5-2-4. Reports to Legislative Council on Warrants or Extensions Granted; Reports on Arrests or Convictions

Sec. 4. (a) Not later than December 31 of each year, a prosecuting attorney who during that year:(1) has received a warrant or an extension; or(2) represents a county in which an arrest or a conviction has occurred as the result of the warrant or extension;shall report in an electronic format under IC 5-14-6 the information described in subsection (b) to the legislative council.(b) A prosecuting attorney shall report the following information under subsection (a):(1) The information required in section 5 of this chapter.(2) The number of arrests resulting from an interception made under a warrant or extension and the designated offense for which each arrest was made.(3) The number of charges filed as a result of an interception.(4) The number of motions to suppress made with respect to an interception and the number of motions granted or denied.(5) The number of convictions resulting from an interception, the designated offense for which each conviction was obtained, and a general assessment of the importance of interception in obtaining the convictions.(6) A general description of the interceptions made under a warrant or an extension, including the following:(A) The approximate nature and frequency of incriminating communications intercepted.(B) The approximate nature and frequency of other communications intercepted.(C) The approximate number of persons whose communications were intercepted.(D) The approximate nature, amount, and cost of manpower and other resources used in relation to the interceptions.As added by P.L.161-1990, SEC.3. Amended by P.L.28-2004, SEC.176.