reglab/housing_qa huggingface dataset:
NM Stat § 36-3-7 (2021)
2021 New Mexico Statutes|Chapter 36 - Attorneys|Article 3 - Immigration and Nationality Law Practice|Section 36-3-7 - Filing; process.

Any information required to be filed by any subsection of the Immigration and Nationality Law Practice Act shall be a matter of public record and shall be disclosed by the attorney general upon written request. History: Laws 1987, ch. 60, § 7.
NM Stat § 36-3-8 (2021)
2021 New Mexico Statutes|Chapter 36 - Attorneys|Article 3 - Immigration and Nationality Law Practice|Section 36-3-8 - Unlawful acts.

Any person who misrepresents the services he may provide in immigration or nationality matters is in violation of the Immigration and Nationality Law Practice Act. History: Laws 1987, ch. 60, § 8.
NM Stat § 36-3-9 (2021)
2021 New Mexico Statutes|Chapter 36 - Attorneys|Article 3 - Immigration and Nationality Law Practice|Section 36-3-9 - Original documents of the client.

No person shall retain original documents of a client in his possession unless authorized by the client. History: Laws 1987, ch. 60, § 9.
NM Stat § 36-3-10 (2021)
2021 New Mexico Statutes|Chapter 36 - Attorneys|Article 3 - Immigration and Nationality Law Practice|Section 36-3-10 - Violation is a misdemeanor.

Violation of any provision in the Immigration and Nationality Law Practice Act constitutes a misdemeanor the penalty for which is as provided in Section 31-19-1 NMSA 1978. History: Laws 1987, ch. 60, § 10.
NM Stat § 37-1-5 (2021)
2021 New Mexico Statutes|Chapter 37 - Limitation of Actions; Abatement and Revivor|Article 1 - Limitations of Actions|Section 37-1-5 - Actions for wage and hour violations.

A civil action to enforce any provision of Chapter 50, Article 4 NMSA 1978 shall be commenced within three years after a violation last occurs. The three-year period shall be tolled during a labor relations division of the workforce solutions department investigation of an employer, but such an investigation shall not be deemed a prerequisite to a person bringing a civil action, nor shall it operate to bar a civil action brought pursuant to Chapter 50, Article 4 NMSA 1978. History: 1941 Comp., § 27-125, enacted by Laws 1947, ch. 44, § 1; 1953 Comp., § 23-1-5; 2009, ch. 104, § 1. ANNOTATIONSThe 2009 amendment, effective June 19, 2009, deleted all of the former language of this section, which provided for a one year statute of limitations period, and added the current language. Am. Jur. 2d, A.L.R. and C.J.S. references. — 48A Am. Jur. 2d Labor and Labor Relations § 3250 et seq.
NM Stat § 37-1-6 (2021)
2021 New Mexico Statutes|Chapter 37 - Limitation of Actions; Abatement and Revivor|Article 1 - Limitations of Actions|Section 37-1-6 - [Accrual of cause of action on open accounts.]

Where there is an open current account the cause of action shall be deemed to have accrued upon the date of the last item therein, as proved on the trial. History: Laws 1880, ch. 5, § 7; C.L. 1884, § 1866; C.L. 1897, § 2919; Code 1915, § 3351; C.S. 1929, § 83-106; 1941 Comp., § 27-105; 1953 Comp., § 23-1-6. ANNOTATIONSBracketed material. — The bracketed material was inserted by the compiler and is not part of the law. With open account there is one single and indivisible liability arising from a connected series of related and reciprocal debits and credits. Panhandle Irrigation, Inc. v. Bates, 1968-NMSC-024, 78 N.M. 706, 437 P.2d 705. Mutual open account. — A mutual, open, current account of which the law takes cognizance in determining the rights and liabilities of debtor and creditor litigants in apparent qualification of the statute of limitations may be defined as an account usually and properly kept in writing, wherein are set down by express or implied agreement of the parties concerned a connected series of debit and credit entries of reciprocal charges and allowances. Gentry v. Gentry, 1955-NMSC-055, 59 N.M. 395, 285 P.2d 503. Lease not an open account. — Lease agreement between oil company and city, which by agreement was to last for five years or so long as oil continued to be produced on the land, could not be unilaterally closed and settled, and therefore was not an "open account" within the meaning of this section. City of Carlsbad v. Grace, 1998-NMCA-144, 126 N.M. 95, 966 P.2d 1178. Loans not transformed to account by payments. — The fact that defendant makes payments to plaintiff on loans works no change in the nature of plaintiff's rights or defendant's liability; it does not create an open current account between the parties. Gentry v. Gentry, 1955-NMSC-055, 59 N.M. 395, 285 P.2d 503. Am. Jur. 2d, A.L.R. and C.J.S. references. — 1 Am. Jur. 2d Accounts and Accounting § 4 et seq. What constitutes an open current account within the statute of limitations, 1 A.L.R. 1060, 39 A.L.R. 369, 57 A.L.R. 201. Inclusion or exclusion of first and last day for purposes of statute of limitations, 20 A.L.R.2d 1249. Entry or indorsement by creditor on note, bond or other obligation as evidence of part payment which will toll the statute of limitations, 23 A.L.R.2d 1331. Estoppel to rely on statute of limitations, 24 A.L.R.2d 1413. 54 C.J.S. Limitations of Actions § 161.
NM Stat § 37-1-11 (2021)
2021 New Mexico Statutes|Chapter 37 - Limitation of Actions; Abatement and Revivor|Article 1 - Limitations of Actions|Section 37-1-11 - [Effect of death.]

If the person entitled to a cause of action die within one year next previous to the expiration of the limitation above provided, the representatives of such persons shall have one year after such death within which to commence said action. History: Laws 1880, ch. 5, § 11; C.L. 1884, § 1870; C.L. 1897, § 29-23; Code 1915, § 3354; C.S. 1929, § 83-109; 1941 Comp., § 27-110; 1953 Comp., § 23-1-11. ANNOTATIONSBracketed material. — The bracketed material was inserted by the compiler and is not part of the law. Effect of section. — This section would allow the bringing of suit within one year from the date of death of an incompetent, provided the injury sued upon did not result in death. Kilkenny v. Kenney, 1961-NMSC-019, 68 N.M. 266, 361 P.2d 149. Section held applicable to claim on note against decedent's estate. Browning v. Estate of Browning, 1886-NMSC-022, 3 N.M. (Gild.) 659, 9 P. 677. Section applies to proceedings in probate court. Browning v. Estate of Browning, 1886-NMSC-022, 3 N.M. (Gild.) 659, 9 P. 677. Section inapplicable to wrongful death. — The Wrongful Death Act, and not this section, applies where the injury sued upon resulted in death. Kilkenny v. Kenney, 1961-NMSC-019, 68 N.M. 266, 361 P.2d 149. Am. Jur. 2d, A.L.R. and C.J.S. references. — 51 Am. Jur. 2d Limitation of Actions §§ 194, 195. Inclusion or exclusion of first and last day for purposes of statute of limitations, 20 A.L.R.2d 1249. Entry or indorsement by creditor on note, bond or other obligation as evidence of part payment which will toll the statute of limitations, 23 A.L.R.2d 1331. Estoppel to rely on statute of limitations, 24 A.L.R.2d 1413. Statute of limitations: effect of delay in appointing administrator or other representative on cause of action accruing at or after death of person in whose favor it would have accrued, 28 A.L.R.3d 1141. 54 C.J.S. Limitations of Action §§ 118, 119.
NM Stat § 37-1-12 (2021)
2021 New Mexico Statutes|Chapter 37 - Limitation of Actions; Abatement and Revivor|Article 1 - Limitations of Actions|Section 37-1-12 - [When commencement of action stayed or prevented.]

When the commencement of any action shall be stayed or prevented by injunction order or other lawful proceeding, the time such injunction order or proceeding shall continue in force shall not be counted in computing the period of limitation. History: Laws 1880, ch. 5, § 15; C.L. 1884, § 1875; C.L. 1897, § 2928; Code 1915, § 3358; C.S. 1929, § 83-113; 1941 Comp., § 27-111; 1953 Comp., § 23-1-12. ANNOTATIONSBracketed material. — The bracketed material was inserted by the compiler and is not part of the law. Mandatory grievance proceedings. — Although New Mexico has no caselaw specifically addressing the tolling requirements upon the filing of mandatory administrative grievances, the language of the statute seems to encompass mandatory grievance proceedings. Roberts v. Barreras, 484 F.3d 1236 (10th Cir. 2007). Pendency of an appeal. — The statute of limitations does not run during the pendency of an appeal. United States Fire Ins. Co. v. Aeronautics, Inc., 1988-NMSC-051, 107 N.M. 320, 757 P.2d 790. Automatic stays in bankruptcy proceedings toll the statute of limitations. — Where plaintiff bank, in February 2016, brought a second foreclosure action against homeowners who defaulted on a mortgage loan in October 2008, following the dismissal of its first foreclosure action, which was filed in October 2009 and where bank exercised an option under the note to accelerate and declare immediately payable and due the full amount of the principal and all interest still owed under the note, and where homeowners filed for bankruptcy three times between 2011 and 2012, the third of which resulted in a discharge order, the district court erred in dismissing bank's entire foreclosure claim as barred by the six-year statute of limitations, because in the context of an installment contract, like the note in this case, the statute would have begun to run with respect to the whole indebtedness only from the date of an exercise of the option to declare the whole indebtedness due, and pursuant to 37-1-12 NMSA 1978, the statute of limitations for its claim for the accelerated balance as of October 2009, was tolled during the periods in which homeowners' three bankruptcies were pending in federal bankruptcy court as a result of automatic stays. LSF9 Master Participation Trust v. Sanchez, 2019-NMCA-055.Stay of proceedings in class action does not preclude a party from filing a separate lawsuit asserting that party's claims and does not toll the statutes of limitations with respect to those claims. Butler v. Deutsche Morgan Grenfell, Inc., 2006-NMCA-084, 140 N.M. 111, 140 P.3d 532, cert. denied, 2006-NMCERT-007, 140 N.M. 279, 142 P.3d 360. Am. Jur. 2d, A.L.R. and C.J.S. references. — 51 Am. Jur. 2d Limitation of Actions § 171. Estoppel to rely on statute of limitations, 24 A.L.R.2d 1413. 54 C.J.S. Limitations of Actions §§ 124, 125.
NM Stat § 37-1-18 (2021)
2021 New Mexico Statutes|Chapter 37 - Limitation of Actions; Abatement and Revivor|Article 1 - Limitations of Actions|Section 37-1-18 - [Limitations not to run against trust actions fraudulently concealed.]

None of the provisions of this chapter shall run against causes of actions originating in or arising out of trusts, when the defendant has fraudulently concealed the cause of action, or the existence thereof from the party entitled or having the right thereto. History: Laws 1880, ch. 5, § 17; C.L. 1884, § 1877; C.L. 1897, § 2930; Code 1915, § 3360; C.S. 1929, § 83-115; 1941 Comp., § 27-117; 1953 Comp., § 23-1-18. ANNOTATIONSBracketed material. — The bracketed material was inserted by the compiler and is not part of the law. Compiler's notes. — The words "this chapter" refer to ch. 68 of the 1915 Code, which is compiled as 37-1-1 to 37-1-4, 37-1-6 to 37-1-19, 37-1-21, 37-1-22, 37-1-25, 37-1-26 NMSA 1978. Action for accounting barred. — An action for an accounting based on a letter from defendants allegedly creating an express trust in certain motel property in plaintiff's favor was barred by six-year statute of limitations, where there was no evidence of fraudulent concealment. Fidel v. Fidel, 1975-NMSC-008, 87 N.M. 283, 532 P.2d 579. Failure to enforce rights. — Where a cestui que trust failed to institute proceedings to enforce alleged rights under an equitable trust for eight years, the court will not aid in the enforcement of his claim. Patterson v. Hewitt, 1901-NMSC-012, 11 N.M. 1, 66 P. 552, aff'd, 195 U.S. 309, 25 S. Ct. 35, 49 L. Ed. 214 (1904). Law reviews. — For survey, "Article VII of the New Probate Code: In Pursuit of Uniform Trust Administration," see 6 N.M. L. Rev. 213 (1976). Am. Jur. 2d, A.L.R. and C.J.S. references. — 51 Am. Jur. 2d Limitations of Actions §§ 146 to 151. 54 C.J.S. Limitations of Actions §§ 88 to 90.
NM Stat § 37-1-21 (2021)
2021 New Mexico Statutes|Chapter 37 - Limitation of Actions; Abatement and Revivor|Article 1 - Limitations of Actions|Section 37-1-21 - Repealed.

History: Laws 1857-1858, p. 64; C.L. 1865, ch. 73, § 1; C.L. 1884, § 1880; C.L. 1897, § 2937; Laws 1899, ch. 63, § 1; Code 1915, § 3364; C.S. 1929, § 83-119; 1941 Comp., § 27-120; 1953 Comp., § 23-1-21; Laws 1973, ch. 138, § 14; 1979, ch. 354, § 1; 1978 Comp., § 37-1-21 repealed by Laws 2007, ch. 266, § 1.ANNOTATIONSRepeals. — Laws 2007, ch. 266, § 2 repealed 37-1-21 NMSA 1978, as enacted by Laws 1857-1858, p. 64, relating to real property held under a governmental deed, effective June 15, 2007. For provisions of former section, see the 2006 NMSA 1978 on NMOneSource.com.
NM Stat § 37-1-25 (2021)
2021 New Mexico Statutes|Chapter 37 - Limitation of Actions; Abatement and Revivor|Article 1 - Limitations of Actions|Section 37-1-25 - [Suit, etc., on municipal and other local governmental bonds or coupons.]

No suit, action or proceeding at law or equity, for the recovery of judgment upon, or the enforcement or collection of, any bond of any county, city, town, school district or other municipality in this state, or upon any coupon thereto attached, shall be commenced except within ten years next after the date of the maturity of such bond or coupon, and all such suits or action not so commenced shall be forever barred. History: Laws 1907, ch. 68, § 1; Code 1915, § 3362; C.S. 1929, § 83-117; 1941 Comp., § 27-123; 1953 Comp., § 23-1-24. ANNOTATIONSBracketed material. — The bracketed material was inserted by the compiler and is not part of the law. Compiler's notes. — The New Mexico Rules of Civil Procedure, applicable to all civil suits cognizable at law or in equity, provide for only one form of action, known as "civil action." See Rules 1-001 and 1-002 NMRA. Cross references. — For the Public Securities Limitation of Action Act, see 6-14-4 NMSA 1978. Limitations start running on interest coupons from coupons' maturity date rather than from the date of maturity of the bonds for which they represent interest payments. 1944 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 44-4570. Am. Jur. 2d, A.L.R. and C.J.S. references. — 12 Am. Jur. 2d Bonds §§ 75 to 79; 51 Am. Jur. 2d Limitation of Actions § 24; 64 Am. Jur. 2d Public Securities and Obligations §§ 500 to 505. Statute of limitations applicable to coupons detached from bonds or other instruments, 62 A.L.R. 270. Inclusion or exclusion of first and last day for purposes of statute of limitations, 20 A.L.R.2d 1249. Entry or endorsement by creditor on note, bond or other obligation as evidence of part payment which will toll the statute of limitations, 23 A.L.R.2d 1331. Estoppel to rely on statute of limitations, 24 A.L.R.2d 1413. When limitations begin to run against actions on public securities or obligations to be paid out of a special or particular fund, 50 A.L.R.2d 271. 20 C.J.S. Counties § 259; 64 C.J.S. Municipal Corporations § 1973; 79 C.J.S. Schools and School Districts § 375.
NM Stat § 37-1-26 (2021)
2021 New Mexico Statutes|Chapter 37 - Limitation of Actions; Abatement and Revivor|Article 1 - Limitations of Actions|Section 37-1-26 - [Questioning of privilege or franchise granted by municipal corporation.]

No action or suit shall be brought to call in question any privilege or franchise granted by any municipal corporation, unless the same shall be brought within six years after the same shall have been granted, or claimed to have been granted, and any such privilege or franchise heretofore granted by any municipal corporation shall, after six years from the date of the granting of the same, or within six years after the same shall have been claimed to have been granted, shall [sic] be deemed valid in all respects. History: Laws 1893, ch. 47, § 1; C.L. 1897, § 2918; Code 1915, § 3363; C.S. 1929, § 83-118; 1941 Comp., § 27-124; 1953 Comp., § 23-1-25. ANNOTATIONSBracketed material. — The bracketed material was inserted by the compiler and is not part of the law. Compiler's notes. — Laws 1893, ch. 47, § 1, contained a preliminary provision indicating that it was amending Laws 1884, ch. II, tit. XXXIII, § 1865. Section is limited to express grants from municipality, and does not apply to an asserted grant under a state statute, nor to an implied prescriptive right. City of Roswell v. Mountain States Tel. & Tel. Co., 78 F.2d 379 (10th Cir. 1935). Injunction. — This section limits actions to call in question, any privilege or franchise granted by any municipal corporation; and the holder of a valid franchise is entitled to injunction against interference by a city council with its rights under such franchise. Agua Pura Co. v. Mayor of Las Vegas, 1900-NMSC-002, 10 N.M. 6, 60 P. 208. Section inapplicable to cancellation or forfeiture. — This section provides a limitation on actions to challenge the validity of a franchise, but does not limit actions to establish a cancellation for forfeiture for default. 1972 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 72-04. Am. Jur. 2d, A.L.R. and C.J.S. references. — Inclusion or exclusion of first and last day for purposes of statute of limitations, 20 A.L.R.2d 1249. 64 C.J.S. Municipal Corporations §§ 1741, 2153.
NM Stat § 37-1-29 (2021)
2021 New Mexico Statutes|Chapter 37 - Limitation of Actions; Abatement and Revivor|Article 1 - Limitations of Actions|Section 37-1-29 - Limitation [on parent-child relationship determination].

An action to determine a parent and child relationship shall be brought no later than three years after the child has reached the age of majority. History: 1978 Comp., § 37-1-29, enacted by Laws 1985, ch. 105, § 18. ANNOTATIONSBracketed material. — The bracketed material was inserted by the compiler and is not part of the law.
NM Stat § 37-2-2 (2021)
2021 New Mexico Statutes|Chapter 37 - Limitation of Actions; Abatement and Revivor|Article 2 - Abatement and Revivor|Section 37-2-2 - [Transfer pendente lite; no abatement.]

No action shall abate by the transfer of any interest therein during its pendency. History: Laws 1880, ch. 6, § 9; C.L. 1884, § 2155; C.L. 1897, § 3104; Code 1915, § 4281; C.S. 1929, § 105-1219; 1941 Comp., § 19-702; 1953 Comp., § 21-7-2. ANNOTATIONSBracketed material. — The bracketed material was inserted by the compiler and is not part of the law. Cross references. — For rule as to transfer of interest, see Rule 1-025 NMRA. Assignment of interest prior to entry of judgment. — If successful litigant assigns his interest after trial and announcement of decision, but before entry of final judgment, judgment may be entered in name of litigant of record and assignees need not be substituted as parties. Dietz v. Hughes, 1935-NMSC-055, 39 N.M. 349, 47 P.2d 417. Am. Jur. 2d, A.L.R. and C.J.S. references. — 1 Am. Jur. 2d Abatement, Survival and Revival § 39 et seq. 1 C.J.S. Abatement and Revival §§ 107, 108.
NM Stat § 37-2-3 (2021)
2021 New Mexico Statutes|Chapter 37 - Limitation of Actions; Abatement and Revivor|Article 2 - Abatement and Revivor|Section 37-2-3 - [Marriage; conviction of crime; suit against prisoner.]

No action shall abate by the marriage or conviction of crime of a party, if the cause of action survive or continue, but the court may order the same to proceed, and an action may be brought or prosecuted to final judgment against any person in prison for crime, regardless of such imprisonment. History: Laws 1897, ch. 73, § 130; C.L. 1897, § 2685 (130); Code 1915, § 4263; C.S. 1929, § 105-1201; 1941 Comp., § 19-703; 1953 Comp., § 21-7-3. ANNOTATIONSBracketed material. — The bracketed material was inserted by the compiler and is not part of the law. Am. Jur. 2d, A.L.R. and C.J.S. references. — 1 C.J.S. Abatement and Revival § 94.
NM Stat § 37-2-4 (2021)
2021 New Mexico Statutes|Chapter 37 - Limitation of Actions; Abatement and Revivor|Article 2 - Abatement and Revivor|Section 37-2-4 - [Death of party to pending action; no abatement; exceptions.]

No action pending in any court shall abate by the death of either, or both, the parties thereto, except an action for libel, slander, malicious prosecution, assault or assault and battery, for a nuisance or against a justice of the peace [magistrate] for misconduct in office, which shall abate by the death of the defendant. History: Laws 1884, ch. 5, § 2; C.L. 1884, § 2139; C.L. 1897, § 3088; Code 1915, § 4265; C.S. 1929, § 105-1203; 1941 Comp., § 19-704; 1953 Comp., § 21-7-4. ANNOTATIONSBracketed material. — The bracketed material was inserted by the compiler and is not part of the law. The office of justice of the peace was abolished and its jurisdiction, powers and duties transferred to the magistrate court. See 35-1-38 NMSA 1978. Cross references. — For death before commencement of action, see 37-2-1 NMSA 1978. For rule relating to substitution upon death of party, see Rule 1-025 NMRA. Application of section. — Section 37-2-4 NMSA 1978 applies only when death occurs while an action is pending; it describes which pending actions abate when one of the parties dies. Padilla v. Estate of Griego, 1992-NMCA-021, 113 N.M. 660, 830 P.2d 1348. Effect of section. — This section gives survivability to all causes of action which are in suit when death of party occurs, except certain specified causes which abate upon the death of a defendant only. Frampton v. Santa Fe N.W. Ry., 1930-NMSC-036, 34 N.M. 660, 287 P. 694. Section does not apply to appeals of criminal convictions. State v. Doak, 1976-NMCA-091, 89 N.M. 532, 554 P.2d 993, overruled by State v. Salazar, 1997-NMSC-044, 123 N.M. 778, 945 P.2d 996. Am. Jur. 2d, A.L.R. and C.J.S. references. — 1 Am. Jur. 2d Abatement, Survival and Revival § 43 et seq. Survival of action or cause of action for wrongful death against representative of wrongdoer, 61 A.L.R. 830, 171 A.L.R. 1392. Effect of death of party to divorce or annulment suit before final decree, 158 A.L.R. 1205. Constitutionality and construction of statute authorizing continuation of pending action against foreign representative of deceased nonresident driver of motor vehicle, arising out of accident occurring in state, 18 A.L.R.2d 544. Death of putative father before, pending or after judgment as affecting bastardy proceedings, 53 A.L.R.3d 188. Claim for punitive damages in tort action as surviving death of tortfeasor or person wronged, 30 A.L.R.4th 707. Abatement of state criminal case by accused's death pending appeal of conviction - modern cases, 80 A.L.R.4th 189. 1 C.J.S. Abatement and Revival §§ 117 to 130.
NM Stat § 37-2-5 (2021)
2021 New Mexico Statutes|Chapter 37 - Limitation of Actions; Abatement and Revivor|Article 2 - Abatement and Revivor|Section 37-2-5 - [Death or cessation of power; procedure when right of action survives to or against coparty.]

Where there are several plaintiffs or defendants in an action, and one of them dies, or his powers as a personal representative cease, if the right of action survives to or against the remaining parties, the action may proceed, the death of the party or the cessation of his powers being stated on the record. History: Laws 1884, ch. 5, § 3; C.L. 1884, § 2140; C.L. 1897, § 3089; Code 1915, § 4266; C.S. 1929, § 105-1204; 1941 Comp., § 19-705; 1953 Comp., § 21-7-5. ANNOTATIONSBracketed material. — The bracketed material was inserted by the compiler and is not part of the law. Cross references. — For powers of surviving personal representative, see 45-3-718 NMSA 1978. For rule regarding substitution of parties in the event of various contingencies, see Rule 1-025 NMRA. Am. Jur. 2d, A.L.R. and C.J.S. references. — 1 Am. Jur. 2d Abatement, Survival and Revival § 45 et seq. 1 C.J.S. Abatement and Revival §§ 122 to 124, 162.