NM Stat § 55-2-207 (2021)
2021 New Mexico Statutes|Chapter 55 - Uniform Commercial Code|Article 2 - Sales|Part 2 - FORM, FORMATION AND READJUSTMENT OF CONTRACT|Section 55-2-207 - Additional terms in acceptance or confirmation.

(1) A definite and seasonable expression of acceptance or a written confirmation which is sent within a reasonable time operates as an acceptance even though it states terms additional to or different from those offered or agreed upon, unless acceptance is expressly made conditional on assent to the additional or different terms. (2) The additional terms are to be construed as proposals for addition to the contract. Between merchants such terms become part of the contract unless: (a) the offer expressly limits acceptance to the terms of the offer; (b) they materially alter it; or (c) notification of objection to them has already been given or is given within a reasonable time after notice of them is received. (3) Conduct by both parties which recognizes the existence of a contract is sufficient to establish a contract for sale although the writings of the parties do not otherwise establish a contract. In such case the terms of the particular contract consist of those terms on which the writings of the parties agree, together with any supplementary terms incorporated under any other provisions of this act [this chapter]. History: 1953 Comp., § 50A-2-207, enacted by Laws 1961, ch. 96, § 2-207. ANNOTATIONSOFFICIAL COMMENTS UCC Official Comments by ALI & the NCCUSL. Reproduced with permission of the PEB for the UCC. All rights reserved. Prior uniform statutory provision. — Sections 1 and 3, Uniform Sales Act. Changes. — Completely rewritten by this and other sections of this article. 1. This section is intended to deal with two typical situations. The one is the written confirmation, where an agreement has been reached either orally or by informal correspondence between the parties and is followed by one or both of the parties sending formal memoranda embodying the terms so far as agreed upon and adding terms not discussed. The other situation is offer and acceptance, in which a wire or letter expressed and intended as an acceptance or the closing of an agreement adds further minor suggestions or proposals such as "ship by Tuesday," "rush," "ship draft against bill of lading inspection allowed" or the like. A frequent example of the second situation is the exchange of printed purchase order and acceptance (sometimes called "acknowledgment") forms. Because the forms are oriented to the thinking of the respective drafting parties, the terms contained in them often do not correspond. Often the seller's form contains terms different from or additional to those set forth in the buyer's form. Nevertheless, the parties proceed with the transaction. [Comment 1 was amended in 1966.] 2. Under this article a proposed deal which in commercial understanding has in fact been closed is recognized as a contract. Therefore, any additional matter contained in the confirmation or in the acceptance falls within Subsection (2) and must be regarded as a proposal for an added term unless the acceptance is made conditional on the acceptance of the additional or different terms. [Comment 2 was amended in 1966.] 3. Whether or not additional or different terms will become part of the agreement depends upon the provisions of Subsection (2). If they are such as materially to alter the original bargain, they will not be included unless expressly agreed to by the other party. If, however, they are terms which would not so change the bargain they will be incorporated unless notice of objection to them has already been given or is given within a reasonable time. 4. Examples of typical clauses which would normally "materially alter" the contract and so result in surprise or hardship if incorporated without express awareness by the other party are: a clause negating such standard warranties as that of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose in circumstances in which either warranty normally attaches; a clause requiring a guaranty of 90% or 100% deliveries in a case such as a contract by cannery, where the usage of the trade allows greater quantity leeways; a clause reserving to the seller the power to cancel upon the buyer's failure to meet any invoice when due and a clause requiring that complaints be made in a time materially shorter than customary or reasonable. 5. Examples of clauses which involve no element of unreasonable surprise and which therefore are to be incorporated in the contract unless notice of objection is seasonably given are: a clause setting forth and perhaps enlarging slightly upon the seller's exemption due to supervening causes beyond his control, similar to those covered by the provision of this article on merchant's excuse by failure of presupposed conditions or a clause fixing in advance any reasonable formula of proration under such circumstances; a clause fixing a reasonable time for complaints within customary limits, or in the case of a purchase for sub-sale, providing for inspection by the sub-purchaser; a clause providing for interest on overdue invoices or fixing the seller's standard credit terms where they are within the range of trade practice and do not limit any credit bargained for and a clause limiting the right of rejection for defects which fall within the customary trade tolerances for acceptance "with adjustment" or otherwise limiting remedy in a reasonable manner (see Sections 2-718 and 2-719). 6. If no answer is received within a reasonable time after additional terms are proposed, it is both fair and commercially sound to assume that their inclusion has been assented to. Where clauses on confirming forms sent by both parties conflict each party must be assumed to object to a clause of the other conflicting with one on the confirmation sent by himself. As a result the requirement that there be notice of objection which is found in Subsection (2) is satisfied and the conflicting terms do not become a part of the contract. The contract then consists of the terms originally expressly agreed to, terms on which the confirmations agree, and terms supplied by this act, including Subsection (2). The written confirmation is also subject to Section 2-201. Under that section a failure to respond permits enforcement of a prior oral agreement; under this section a failure to respond permits additional terms to become part of the agreement. [Comment 6 was amended in 1966.] 7. In many cases, as where goods are shipped, accepted and paid for before any dispute arises, there is no question whether a contract has been made. In such cases, where the writings of the parties do not establish a contract, it is not necessary to determine which act or document constituted the offer and which the acceptance. See Section 2-204. The only question is what terms are included in the contract, and Subsection (3) furnishes the governing rule. [Comment 7 was added in 1966.] See generally Section 2-302. Point 5: Sections 2-513, 2-602, 2-607, 2-609, 2-612, 2-614, 2-615, 2-616, 2-718 and 2-719. Point 6: Sections 1-102 and 2-104. "Between merchants". Section 2-104. "Contract". Section 1-201. "Notification". Section 1-201. "Reasonable time". Section 1-204. "Seasonably". Section 1-204. "Send". Section 1-201. "Term". Section 1-201. "Written". Section 1-201. Exchange of forms containing conflicting clauses. — An exchange of forms containing identical dickered terms, such as the identity, price, and quantity of goods, and conflicting undickered boilerplate provisions, such as warranty terms in a provision making the bargain subject to the terms and conditions of the offeree's document, however worded, will not propel the transaction into the "expressly conditional" language of Subsection (1) and confer the status of counteroffer on the responsive document. The question guiding the inquiry should be whether the offerer could reasonably believe that in the context of the commercial setting in which the parties were acting, a contract had been formed. Gardner Zemke Co. v. Dunham Bush, Inc., 1993-NMSC-016, 115 N.M. 260, 850 P.2d 319. Where clauses on confirming forms sent by both parties conflict, each party must be assumed to object to a clause of the other conflicting with one on the confirmation sent by himself. As a result the requirement that there be notice of objection, which is found in Subsection (2), is satisfied and the conflicting terms do not become a part of the contract. The contract then consists of the terms originally expressly agreed to, terms on which the confirmation is agreed, and terms applied by this act, including Subsection (2). Gardner Zemke Co. v. Dunham Bush, Inc., 1993-NMSC-016, 115 N.M. 260, 850 P.2d 319. Contract can be modified by conduct of parties once its existence is established. Elephant Butte Resort Marina, Inc. v. Wooldridge, 1985-NMSC-014, 102 N.M. 286, 694 P.2d 1351. Alternative financing agreement waived need for written contract modification. — Where a boat buyer's agreement with a bank concerning alternate financing was conduct waiving the need for a written contract modification, the financing terms agreed upon between the buyer and the bank became a part of the contract, and the contract was supplemented in a commercially reasonable manner. Elephant Butte Resort Marina, Inc. v. Wooldridge, 1985-NMSC-014, 102 N.M. 286, 694 P.2d 1351. Attorney fee provision in contract. — The New Mexico courts have not yet decided the issue of whether an attorney fee provision constitutes a material alteration to a contract, but such provision may involve an unreasonable surprise and therefore constitute a material alteration. American Ins. Co. v. El Paso Pipe & Supply Co., 978 F.2d 1185 (10th Cir. 1992). Because the district court failed to indicate any factual basis for its ultimate conclusion that the attorney fee provision in the purchase order was not a material alteration, the case was remanded for further proceedings to permit the trial court to apply the appropriate criteria and make the missing findings of fact. American Ins. Co. v. El Paso Pipe & Supply Co., 978 F.2d 1185 (10th Cir. 1992). Law reviews. — For comment, "Commercial Law - Uniform Commercial Code - Sale of Goods," see 8 Nat. Resources J. 176 (1968). For article, "Buyers and Sellers of Goods in Bankruptcy," see 1 N.M. L. Rev. 435 (1971). Am. Jur. 2d, A.L.R. and C.J.S. references. — What constitutes acceptance "expressly made conditional" converting it to rejection and counteroffer under UCC § 2-207(1), 22 A.L.R.4th 939. 77A C.J.S. Sales § 38 et seq.