reglab/housing_qa huggingface dataset:
CA Civ Code § 3509 (2021)
2021 California Code|Civil Code - CIV|DIVISION 4 - GENERAL PROVISIONS|PART 4 - MAXIMS OF JURISPRUDENCE|Section 3509.

3509.  The maxims of jurisprudence hereinafter set forth are intended not to qualify any of the foregoing provisions of this code, but to aid in their just application.(Amended by Stats. 2013, Ch. 76, Sec. 20. (AB 383) Effective January 1, 2014.)
CA Civ Code § 3510 (2021)
2021 California Code|Civil Code - CIV|DIVISION 4 - GENERAL PROVISIONS|PART 4 - MAXIMS OF JURISPRUDENCE|Section 3510.

3510.  When the reason of a rule ceases, so should the rule itself.(Enacted 1872.)
CA Civ Code § 3511 (2021)
2021 California Code|Civil Code - CIV|DIVISION 4 - GENERAL PROVISIONS|PART 4 - MAXIMS OF JURISPRUDENCE|Section 3511.

3511.  Where the reason is the same, the rule should be the same.(Enacted 1872.)
CA Civ Code § 3512 (2021)
2021 California Code|Civil Code - CIV|DIVISION 4 - GENERAL PROVISIONS|PART 4 - MAXIMS OF JURISPRUDENCE|Section 3512.

3512.  One must not change his purpose to the injury of another.(Enacted 1872.)
CA Civ Code § 3513 (2021)
2021 California Code|Civil Code - CIV|DIVISION 4 - GENERAL PROVISIONS|PART 4 - MAXIMS OF JURISPRUDENCE|Section 3513.

3513.  Any one may waive the advantage of a law intended solely for his benefit. But a law established for a public reason cannot be contravened by a private agreement.(Enacted 1872.)
CA Civ Code § 3514 (2021)
2021 California Code|Civil Code - CIV|DIVISION 4 - GENERAL PROVISIONS|PART 4 - MAXIMS OF JURISPRUDENCE|Section 3514.

3514.  One must so use his own rights as not to infringe upon the rights of another.(Enacted 1872.)
CA Civ Code § 3515 (2021)
2021 California Code|Civil Code - CIV|DIVISION 4 - GENERAL PROVISIONS|PART 4 - MAXIMS OF JURISPRUDENCE|Section 3515.

3515.  He who consents to an act is not wronged by it.(Enacted 1872.)
CA Civ Code § 3516 (2021)
2021 California Code|Civil Code - CIV|DIVISION 4 - GENERAL PROVISIONS|PART 4 - MAXIMS OF JURISPRUDENCE|Section 3516.

3516.  Acquiescence in error takes away the right of objecting to it.(Enacted 1872.)
CA Civ Code § 3517 (2021)
2021 California Code|Civil Code - CIV|DIVISION 4 - GENERAL PROVISIONS|PART 4 - MAXIMS OF JURISPRUDENCE|Section 3517.

3517.  No one can take advantage of his own wrong.(Enacted 1872.)
CA Civ Code § 3518 (2021)
2021 California Code|Civil Code - CIV|DIVISION 4 - GENERAL PROVISIONS|PART 4 - MAXIMS OF JURISPRUDENCE|Section 3518.

3518.  He who has fraudulently dispossessed himself of a thing may be treated as if he still had possession.(Enacted 1872.)
CA Civ Code § 3519 (2021)
2021 California Code|Civil Code - CIV|DIVISION 4 - GENERAL PROVISIONS|PART 4 - MAXIMS OF JURISPRUDENCE|Section 3519.

3519.  He who can and does not forbid that which is done on his behalf, is deemed to have bidden it.(Enacted 1872.)
CA Civ Code § 3520 (2021)
2021 California Code|Civil Code - CIV|DIVISION 4 - GENERAL PROVISIONS|PART 4 - MAXIMS OF JURISPRUDENCE|Section 3520.

3520.  No one should suffer by the act of another.(Enacted 1872.)
CA Civ Code § 3521 (2021)
2021 California Code|Civil Code - CIV|DIVISION 4 - GENERAL PROVISIONS|PART 4 - MAXIMS OF JURISPRUDENCE|Section 3521.

3521.  He who takes the benefit must bear the burden.(Enacted 1872.)
CA Civ Code § 3522 (2021)
2021 California Code|Civil Code - CIV|DIVISION 4 - GENERAL PROVISIONS|PART 4 - MAXIMS OF JURISPRUDENCE|Section 3522.

3522.  One who grants a thing is presumed to grant also whatever is essential to its use.(Enacted 1872.)
CA Civ Code § 3523 (2021)
2021 California Code|Civil Code - CIV|DIVISION 4 - GENERAL PROVISIONS|PART 4 - MAXIMS OF JURISPRUDENCE|Section 3523.

3523.  For every wrong there is a remedy.(Enacted 1872.)
CA Civ Code § 3524 (2021)
2021 California Code|Civil Code - CIV|DIVISION 4 - GENERAL PROVISIONS|PART 4 - MAXIMS OF JURISPRUDENCE|Section 3524.

3524.  Between those who are equally in the right, or equally in the wrong, the law does not interpose.(Enacted 1872.)
CA Civ Code § 3525 (2021)
2021 California Code|Civil Code - CIV|DIVISION 4 - GENERAL PROVISIONS|PART 4 - MAXIMS OF JURISPRUDENCE|Section 3525.

3525.  Between rights otherwise equal, the earliest is preferred.(Enacted 1872.)
CA Civ Code § 3526 (2021)
2021 California Code|Civil Code - CIV|DIVISION 4 - GENERAL PROVISIONS|PART 4 - MAXIMS OF JURISPRUDENCE|Section 3526.

3526.  No man is responsible for that which no man can control.(Enacted 1872.)
CA Civ Code § 3527 (2021)
2021 California Code|Civil Code - CIV|DIVISION 4 - GENERAL PROVISIONS|PART 4 - MAXIMS OF JURISPRUDENCE|Section 3527.

3527.  The law helps the vigilant, before those who sleep on their rights.(Enacted 1872.)
CA Civ Code § 3528 (2021)
2021 California Code|Civil Code - CIV|DIVISION 4 - GENERAL PROVISIONS|PART 4 - MAXIMS OF JURISPRUDENCE|Section 3528.

3528.  The law respects form less than substance.(Enacted 1872.)
CA Civ Code § 3529 (2021)
2021 California Code|Civil Code - CIV|DIVISION 4 - GENERAL PROVISIONS|PART 4 - MAXIMS OF JURISPRUDENCE|Section 3529.

3529.  That which ought to have been done is to be regarded as done, in favor of him to whom, and against him from whom, performance is due.(Enacted 1872.)
CA Civ Code § 3530 (2021)
2021 California Code|Civil Code - CIV|DIVISION 4 - GENERAL PROVISIONS|PART 4 - MAXIMS OF JURISPRUDENCE|Section 3530.

3530.  That which does not appear to exist is to be regarded as if it did not exist.(Enacted 1872.)
CA Civ Code § 3531 (2021)
2021 California Code|Civil Code - CIV|DIVISION 4 - GENERAL PROVISIONS|PART 4 - MAXIMS OF JURISPRUDENCE|Section 3531.

3531.  The law never requires impossibilities.(Enacted 1872.)
CA Civ Code § 3532 (2021)
2021 California Code|Civil Code - CIV|DIVISION 4 - GENERAL PROVISIONS|PART 4 - MAXIMS OF JURISPRUDENCE|Section 3532.

3532.  The law neither does nor requires idle acts.(Enacted 1872.)
CA Civ Code § 3533 (2021)
2021 California Code|Civil Code - CIV|DIVISION 4 - GENERAL PROVISIONS|PART 4 - MAXIMS OF JURISPRUDENCE|Section 3533.

3533.  The law disregards trifles.(Enacted 1872.)
CA Civ Code § 3534 (2021)
2021 California Code|Civil Code - CIV|DIVISION 4 - GENERAL PROVISIONS|PART 4 - MAXIMS OF JURISPRUDENCE|Section 3534.

3534.  Particular expressions qualify those which are general.(Enacted 1872.)
CA Civ Code § 3535 (2021)
2021 California Code|Civil Code - CIV|DIVISION 4 - GENERAL PROVISIONS|PART 4 - MAXIMS OF JURISPRUDENCE|Section 3535.

3535.  Contemporaneous exposition is in general the best.(Enacted 1872.)
CA Civ Code § 3536 (2021)
2021 California Code|Civil Code - CIV|DIVISION 4 - GENERAL PROVISIONS|PART 4 - MAXIMS OF JURISPRUDENCE|Section 3536.

3536.  The greater contains the less.(Enacted 1872.)
CA Civ Code § 3537 (2021)
2021 California Code|Civil Code - CIV|DIVISION 4 - GENERAL PROVISIONS|PART 4 - MAXIMS OF JURISPRUDENCE|Section 3537.

3537.  Superfluity does not vitiate.(Enacted 1872.)
CA Civ Code § 3538 (2021)
2021 California Code|Civil Code - CIV|DIVISION 4 - GENERAL PROVISIONS|PART 4 - MAXIMS OF JURISPRUDENCE|Section 3538.

3538.  That is certain which can be made certain.(Enacted 1872.)
CA Civ Code § 3539 (2021)
2021 California Code|Civil Code - CIV|DIVISION 4 - GENERAL PROVISIONS|PART 4 - MAXIMS OF JURISPRUDENCE|Section 3539.

3539.  Time does not confirm a void act.(Enacted 1872.)
CA Civ Code § 3540 (2021)
2021 California Code|Civil Code - CIV|DIVISION 4 - GENERAL PROVISIONS|PART 4 - MAXIMS OF JURISPRUDENCE|Section 3540.

3540.  The incident follows the principal, and not the principal the incident.(Enacted 1872.)
CA Civ Code § 3541 (2021)
2021 California Code|Civil Code - CIV|DIVISION 4 - GENERAL PROVISIONS|PART 4 - MAXIMS OF JURISPRUDENCE|Section 3541.

3541.  An interpretation which gives effect is preferred to one which makes void.(Enacted 1872.)
CA Civ Code § 3542 (2021)
2021 California Code|Civil Code - CIV|DIVISION 4 - GENERAL PROVISIONS|PART 4 - MAXIMS OF JURISPRUDENCE|Section 3542.

3542.  Interpretation must be reasonable.(Enacted 1872.)
CA Civ Code § 3543 (2021)
2021 California Code|Civil Code - CIV|DIVISION 4 - GENERAL PROVISIONS|PART 4 - MAXIMS OF JURISPRUDENCE|Section 3543.

3543.  Where one of two innocent persons must suffer by the act of a third, he, by whose negligence it happened, must be the sufferer.(Enacted 1872.)
CA Civ Code § 3545 (2021)
2021 California Code|Civil Code - CIV|DIVISION 4 - GENERAL PROVISIONS|PART 4 - MAXIMS OF JURISPRUDENCE|Section 3545.

3545.  Private transactions are fair and regular.(Added by Stats. 1965, Ch. 299.)
CA Civ Code § 3546 (2021)
2021 California Code|Civil Code - CIV|DIVISION 4 - GENERAL PROVISIONS|PART 4 - MAXIMS OF JURISPRUDENCE|Section 3546.

3546.  Things happen according to the ordinary course of nature and the ordinary habits of life.(Added by Stats. 1965, Ch. 299.)
CA Civ Code § 3547 (2021)
2021 California Code|Civil Code - CIV|DIVISION 4 - GENERAL PROVISIONS|PART 4 - MAXIMS OF JURISPRUDENCE|Section 3547.

3547.  A thing continues to exist as long as is usual with things of that nature.(Added by Stats. 1965, Ch. 299.)
CA Civ Code § 3548 (2021)
2021 California Code|Civil Code - CIV|DIVISION 4 - GENERAL PROVISIONS|PART 4 - MAXIMS OF JURISPRUDENCE|Section 3548.

3548.  The law has been obeyed.(Added by Stats. 1965, Ch. 299.)
CA Civ Code § 7101 (2021)
2021 California Code|Civil Code - CIV|DIVISION 4 - GENERAL PROVISIONS|PART 5.5 - AUTOMATIC CHECKOUT SYSTEM|Section 7101.

7101.  (a) The intentional violation of Section 7100 is punishable by a civil penalty of not less than twenty-five dollars ($25) nor more than five hundred dollars ($500).(b) Failure to have a clearly readable price indicated on 12 units of the same item required to be item-priced of the same commodity shall constitute a presumption of intent to violate Section 7100.(c) Every additional 12 units of the same item required to be item-priced that fail to have a price indicated on them shall constitute a presumption of intent to violate Section 7100.(d) Each day that a violation continues shall also constitute a separate violation after notification thereof to the manager or assistant manager of the retail grocery store or the grocery department of the general retail merchandise store and shall constitute a presumption of intent to violate Section 7100.(e) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any person may bring an action to enjoin a violation of Section 7100.(Added by Stats. 1981, Ch. 224, Sec. 2.)
CA Civ Code § 7102 (2021)
2021 California Code|Civil Code - CIV|DIVISION 4 - GENERAL PROVISIONS|PART 5.5 - AUTOMATIC CHECKOUT SYSTEM|Section 7102.

7102.  Any person, firm, corporation, or association who violates Sections 7100 and 7101 shall be liable to any person injured for any losses and expenses thereby incurred, and for the sum of fifty dollars ($50) in addition thereto. The remedy set forth herein is applicable only to actions brought in the name of, and on behalf of, a single plaintiff and shall not be applicable in multiple plaintiff or class actions.(Added by Stats. 1981, Ch. 224, Sec. 2.)
CA Civ Code § 7103 (2021)
2021 California Code|Civil Code - CIV|DIVISION 4 - GENERAL PROVISIONS|PART 5.5 - AUTOMATIC CHECKOUT SYSTEM|Section 7103.

7103.  Improper pricing on the shelf or on the item due to unintentional error shall not constitute a violation of this division.(Added by Stats. 1981, Ch. 224, Sec. 2.)
CA Civ Code § 7104 (2021)
2021 California Code|Civil Code - CIV|DIVISION 4 - GENERAL PROVISIONS|PART 5.5 - AUTOMATIC CHECKOUT SYSTEM|Section 7104.

7104.  The remedies set forth in Sections 7101 and 7102 are the exclusive remedies available to any person, state or local agency or law enforcement official.(Added by Stats. 1981, Ch. 224, Sec. 2.)
CA Civ Code § 7105 (2021)
2021 California Code|Civil Code - CIV|DIVISION 4 - GENERAL PROVISIONS|PART 5.5 - AUTOMATIC CHECKOUT SYSTEM|Section 7105.

7105.  This part shall be known and may be cited as the Rosenthal-Roberti Item Pricing Act.(Added by Stats. 1981, Ch. 224, Sec. 2.)
CA Civ Code § 7106 (2021)
2021 California Code|Civil Code - CIV|DIVISION 4 - GENERAL PROVISIONS|PART 5.5 - AUTOMATIC CHECKOUT SYSTEM|Section 7106.

7106.  It is the intention of the Legislature that this part shall occupy the field with regard to item pricing and shall preempt all local ordinances, rules, or regulations concerning item pricing.(Added by Stats. 1981, Ch. 224, Sec. 2.)
CA Civ Pro Code § 307 (2021)
2021 California Code|Code of Civil Procedure - CCP|PART 2 - OF CIVIL ACTIONS|TITLE 1 - OF THE FORM OF CIVIL ACTIONS|Section 307.

307.  There is in this State but one form of civil actions for the enforcement or protection of private rights and the redress or prevention of private wrongs.(Enacted 1872.)
CA Civ Pro Code § 308 (2021)
2021 California Code|Code of Civil Procedure - CCP|PART 2 - OF CIVIL ACTIONS|TITLE 1 - OF THE FORM OF CIVIL ACTIONS|Section 308.

308.  In such action the party complaining is known as the plaintiff, and the adverse party as the defendant.(Enacted 1872.)
CA Civ Pro Code § 309 (2021)
2021 California Code|Code of Civil Procedure - CCP|PART 2 - OF CIVIL ACTIONS|TITLE 1 - OF THE FORM OF CIVIL ACTIONS|Section 309.

309.  A question of fact not put in issue by the pleadings may be tried by a jury, upon an order for the trial, stating distinctly and plainly the question of fact to be tried; and such order is the only authority necessary for a trial.(Enacted 1872.)
CA Civ Pro Code § 391 (2021)
2021 California Code|Code of Civil Procedure - CCP|PART 2 - OF CIVIL ACTIONS|TITLE 3A - VEXATIOUS LITIGANTS|Section 391.

391.  As used in this title, the following terms have the following meanings:(a) “Litigation” means any civil action or proceeding, commenced, maintained or pending in any state or federal court.(b) “Vexatious litigant” means a person who does any of the following:(1) In the immediately preceding seven-year period has commenced, prosecuted, or maintained in propria persona at least five litigations other than in a small claims court that have been (i) finally determined adversely to the person or (ii) unjustifiably permitted to remain pending at least two years without having been brought to trial or hearing.(2) After a litigation has been finally determined against the person, repeatedly relitigates or attempts to relitigate, in propria persona, either (i) the validity of the determination against the same defendant or defendants as to whom the litigation was finally determined or (ii) the cause of action, claim, controversy, or any of the issues of fact or law, determined or concluded by the final determination against the same defendant or defendants as to whom the litigation was finally determined.(3) In any litigation while acting in propria persona, repeatedly files unmeritorious motions, pleadings, or other papers, conducts unnecessary discovery, or engages in other tactics that are frivolous or solely intended to cause unnecessary delay.(4) Has previously been declared to be a vexatious litigant by any state or federal court of record in any action or proceeding based upon the same or substantially similar facts, transaction, or occurrence.(c) “Security” means an undertaking to assure payment, to the party for whose benefit the undertaking is required to be furnished, of the party’s reasonable expenses, including attorney’s fees and not limited to taxable costs, incurred in or in connection with a litigation instituted, caused to be instituted, or maintained or caused to be maintained by a vexatious litigant.(d) “Plaintiff” means the person who commences, institutes or maintains a litigation or causes it to be commenced, instituted or maintained, including an attorney at law acting in propria persona.(e) “Defendant” means a person (including corporation, association, partnership and firm or governmental entity) against whom a litigation is brought or maintained or sought to be brought or maintained.(Amended by Stats. 1994, Ch. 587, Sec. 3.5. Effective January 1, 1995.)
CA Civ Pro Code § 391.1 (2021)
2021 California Code|Code of Civil Procedure - CCP|PART 2 - OF CIVIL ACTIONS|TITLE 3A - VEXATIOUS LITIGANTS|Section 391.1.

391.1.  In any litigation pending in any court of this state, at any time until final judgment is entered, a defendant may move the court, upon notice and hearing, for an order requiring the plaintiff to furnish security or for an order dismissing the litigation pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 391.3. The motion for an order requiring the plaintiff to furnish security shall be based upon the ground, and supported by a showing, that the plaintiff is a vexatious litigant and that there is not a reasonable probability that he or she will prevail in the litigation against the moving defendant.(Amended by Stats. 2012, Ch. 417, Sec. 1. (AB 2274) Effective January 1, 2013.)
CA Civ Pro Code § 391.2 (2021)
2021 California Code|Code of Civil Procedure - CCP|PART 2 - OF CIVIL ACTIONS|TITLE 3A - VEXATIOUS LITIGANTS|Section 391.2.

391.2.  At the hearing upon the motion the court shall consider any evidence, written or oral, by witnesses or affidavit, as may be material to the ground of the motion. Except for an order dismissing the litigation pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 391.3, no determination made by the court in determining or ruling upon the motion shall be or be deemed to be a determination of any issue in the litigation or of the merits thereof.(Amended by Stats. 2012, Ch. 417, Sec. 2. (AB 2274) Effective January 1, 2013.)
CA Civ Pro Code § 391.3 (2021)
2021 California Code|Code of Civil Procedure - CCP|PART 2 - OF CIVIL ACTIONS|TITLE 3A - VEXATIOUS LITIGANTS|Section 391.3.

391.3.  (a) Except as provided in subdivision (b), if, after hearing the evidence upon the motion, the court determines that the plaintiff is a vexatious litigant and that there is no reasonable probability that the plaintiff will prevail in the litigation against the moving defendant, the court shall order the plaintiff to furnish, for the benefit of the moving defendant, security in such amount and within such time as the court shall fix.(b) If, after hearing evidence on the motion, the court determines that the litigation has no merit and has been filed for the purposes of harassment or delay, the court shall order the litigation dismissed. This subdivision shall only apply to litigation filed in a court of this state by a vexatious litigant subject to a prefiling order pursuant to Section 391.7 who was represented by counsel at the time the litigation was filed and who became in propria persona after the withdrawal of his or her attorney.(c) A defendant may make a motion for relief in the alternative under either subdivision (a) or (b) and shall combine all grounds for relief in one motion.(Amended by Stats. 2012, Ch. 417, Sec. 3. (AB 2274) Effective January 1, 2013.)
CA Civ Pro Code § 391.4 (2021)
2021 California Code|Code of Civil Procedure - CCP|PART 2 - OF CIVIL ACTIONS|TITLE 3A - VEXATIOUS LITIGANTS|Section 391.4.

391.4.  When security that has been ordered furnished is not furnished as ordered, the litigation shall be dismissed as to the defendant for whose benefit it was ordered furnished.(Added by Stats. 1963, Ch. 1471.)
CA Civ Pro Code § 391.6 (2021)
2021 California Code|Code of Civil Procedure - CCP|PART 2 - OF CIVIL ACTIONS|TITLE 3A - VEXATIOUS LITIGANTS|Section 391.6.

391.6.  Except as provided in subdivision (b) of Section 391.3, when a motion pursuant to Section 391.1 is filed prior to trial the litigation is stayed, and the moving defendant need not plead, until 10 days after the motion shall have been denied, or if granted, until 10 days after the required security has been furnished and the moving defendant given written notice thereof. When a motion pursuant to Section 391.1 is made at any time thereafter, the litigation shall be stayed for such period after the denial of the motion or the furnishing of the required security as the court shall determine.(Amended by Stats. 2012, Ch. 417, Sec. 4. (AB 2274) Effective January 1, 2013.)
CA Civ Pro Code § 391.7 (2021)
2021 California Code|Code of Civil Procedure - CCP|PART 2 - OF CIVIL ACTIONS|TITLE 3A - VEXATIOUS LITIGANTS|Section 391.7.

391.7.  (a) In addition to any other relief provided in this title, the court may, on its own motion or the motion of any party, enter a prefiling order which prohibits a vexatious litigant from filing any new litigation in the courts of this state in propria persona without first obtaining leave of the presiding justice or presiding judge of the court where the litigation is proposed to be filed. Disobedience of the order by a vexatious litigant may be punished as a contempt of court.(b) The presiding justice or presiding judge shall permit the filing of that litigation only if it appears that the litigation has merit and has not been filed for the purposes of harassment or delay. The presiding justice or presiding judge may condition the filing of the litigation upon the furnishing of security for the benefit of the defendants as provided in Section 391.3.(c) The clerk may not file any litigation presented by a vexatious litigant subject to a prefiling order unless the vexatious litigant first obtains an order from the presiding justice or presiding judge permitting the filing. If the clerk mistakenly files the litigation without the order, any party may file with the clerk and serve, or the presiding justice or presiding judge may direct the clerk to file and serve, on the plaintiff and other parties a notice stating that the plaintiff is a vexatious litigant subject to a prefiling order as set forth in subdivision (a). The filing of the notice shall automatically stay the litigation. The litigation shall be automatically dismissed unless the plaintiff within 10 days of the filing of that notice obtains an order from the presiding justice or presiding judge permitting the filing of the litigation as set forth in subdivision (b). If the presiding justice or presiding judge issues an order permitting the filing, the stay of the litigation shall remain in effect, and the defendants need not plead, until 10 days after the defendants are served with a copy of the order.(d) For purposes of this section, “litigation” includes any petition, application, or motion other than a discovery motion, in a proceeding under the Family Code or Probate Code, for any order.(e) The presiding justice or presiding judge of a court may designate a justice or judge of the same court to act on his or her behalf in exercising the authority and responsibilities provided under subdivisions (a) to (c), inclusive.(f) The clerk of the court shall provide the Judicial Council a copy of any prefiling orders issued pursuant to subdivision (a). The Judicial Council shall maintain a record of vexatious litigants subject to those prefiling orders and shall annually disseminate a list of those persons to the clerks of the courts of this state.(Amended by Stats. 2011, Ch. 49, Sec. 1. (SB 731) Effective January 1, 2012.)