CO Code § 16-4-106 (2021)
2021 Colorado Code|Title 16 - Criminal Proceedings|Article 4 - Release From Custody Pending Final Adjudication|Part 1 - Release on Bail|§ 16-4-106. Pretrial Services Programs

  The chief judge of any judicial district may order a person who is eligible for bond or other pretrial release to be evaluated by a pretrial services program established pursuant to this section, which program may advise the court if the person is bond eligible, may provide information that enables the court to make an appropriate decision on bond and conditions of release, and may recommend conditions of release consistent with this section. The chief judge may make such order in any or all of the counties of the chief judge's judicial district.    The chief judge of any judicial district shall endeavor to consult, on an annual basis, with the county or counties within the judicial district in an effort to support and encourage the development by the county or counties, to the extent practicable and within available resources, of pretrial services programs that support the work of the court and evidence-based decision-making in determining the type of bond and conditions of release.    To reduce barriers to the pretrial release of persons in custody whose release on bond with appropriate conditions reasonably assures court appearance and public safety, all counties and cities and counties are encouraged to develop a pretrial services program in consultation with the chief judge of the judicial district in an effort to establish a pretrial services program that may be utilized by the district court of such county or city and county. Any pretrial services program must be established pursuant to a plan formulated by a community advisory board created for such purpose and appointed by the chief judge of the judicial district. Membership on such community advisory board must include, at a minimum, a representative of a local law enforcement agency, a representative of the district attorney, a representative of the public defender, and a representative of the citizens at large. The chief judge is encouraged to appoint to the community advisory board at least one representative of the bail bond industry who conducts business in the judicial district, which may include a bail bondsman, a bail surety, or other designated bail industry representative. The plan formulated by such community advisory board must be approved by the chief judge of the judicial district prior to the establishment and utilization of the pretrial services program. The option contained in this section that a pretrial services program be established pursuant to a plan formulated by the community advisory board does not apply to any pretrial services program that existed before May 31, 1991.    Any pretrial services program approved pursuant to this section must meet the following criteria:   The program must establish a procedure for the screening of persons who are detained due to an arrest for the alleged commission of a crime so that such information may be provided to the judge who is setting the bond and conditions of release. The program must provide information that provides the court with the ability to make an appropriate initial bond decision that is based upon facts relating to the person's risk of failure to appear for court and risk of danger to the community.    The program must make all reasonable attempts to provide the court with such information delineated in this section as is appropriate to each individual person seeking release from custody;    The program, in conjunction with the community advisory board, must make all reasonable efforts to implement an empirically developed pretrial risk assessment tool, to be used by the program, the court, and the parties to the case solely for the purpose of assessing pretrial risk, and a structured decision-making design based upon the person's charge and the risk assessment score; and    The program must work with all appropriate agencies and assist with all efforts to comply with sections 24-4.1-302.5 and 24-4.1-303, C.R.S.       Any pretrial services program may also include different methods and levels of community-based supervision as a condition of release, and the program must use established methods for persons who are released prior to trial in order to decrease unnecessary pretrial detention. The program may include, but is not limited to, any of the criteria as outlined in section 16-4-105 (8) as conditions for pretrial release.    Commencing July 1, 2012, each pretrial services program established pursuant to this section shall provide an annual report to the judicial department no later than November 1 of each year, regardless of whether the program existed prior to May 31, 1991. Notwithstanding section 24-1-136 (11)(a)(I), the judicial department shall present an annual combined report to the house and senate judiciary committees of the house of representatives and the senate, or any successor committees, of the general assembly. The report to the judicial department must include, but is not limited to, the following information:   The total number of pretrial assessments performed by the program and submitted to the court;    The total number of closed cases by the program in which the person was released from custody and supervised by the program;    The total number of closed cases in which the person was released from custody, was supervised by the program, and, while under supervision, appeared for all scheduled court appearances on the case;    The total number of closed cases in which the person was released from custody, was supervised by the program, and was not charged with a new criminal offense that was alleged to have occurred while under supervision and that carried the possibility of a sentence to jail or imprisonment;    The total number of closed cases in which the person was released from custody and was supervised by the program, and the person's bond was not revoked by the court due to a violation of any other terms and conditions of supervision; and    Any additional information the judicial department may request.       For the reports required in subsection (6) of this section, the pretrial services program shall include information detailing the number of persons released on a commercial surety bond in addition to pretrial supervision, the number of persons released on a cash, private surety, or property bond in addition to pretrial supervision, and the number of persons released on any form of a personal recognizance bond in addition to pretrial supervision.     History. Source: L. 2013: Entire part R&RE,(HB 13-1236), ch. 202, p. 828, § 2, effective May 11. L. 2014: (4)(c) amended,(SB 14-212), ch. 397, p. 1999, § 4, effective July 1. L. 2017: IP(6) amended,(SB 17-241), ch. 171, p. 624, § 5, effective April 28.    ANNOTATION   Annotator's note. Since § 16-4-106 is similar to § 16-4-105 as it existed prior to the 2013 repeal and reenactment of this part 1, relevant cases decided under that provision and former provisions similar to that section have been included in the annotations to this section.   The primary function of bail is to assure the presence of the accused. People v. Sanders, 185 Colo. 153 , 522 P.2d 735 (1974).   And this end should be met by means which impose the least possible hardship upon the accused. People v. Sanders, 185 Colo. 153 , 522 P.2d 735 (1974). Pretrial services program exceeded its statutory authority when it imposed a condition barring defendant from possessing weapons. This statute does not anticipate or permit the court to delegate authority to set conditions of bond to a pretrial services program. People v. Rickman, 178 P.3d 1202 (Colo. 2008).   Pretrial services program did not exceed its statutory authority when it imposed a condition barring defendant from committing a felony while on bail. Section 16-4-103 (2)(c) requires that, as a condition of every bail bond, “the released person not commit any felony while at liberty on such bail bond”. Because this prohibition is statutorily mandated, it constitutes a condition of every bail bond regardless of any action by the court or pretrial services program. People v. Rickman, 178 P.3d 1202 (Colo. 2008).