reglab/housing_qa huggingface dataset:
CA Ev Code § 769 (2021)
2021 California Code|Evidence Code - EVID|DIVISION 6 - WITNESSES|CHAPTER 5 - Method and Scope of Examination|ARTICLE 2 - Examination of Witnesses|Section 769.

769.  In examining a witness concerning a statement or other conduct by him that is inconsistent with any part of his testimony at the hearing, it is not necessary to disclose to him any information concerning the statement or other conduct.(Enacted by Stats. 1965, Ch. 299.)
CA Ev Code § 770 (2021)
2021 California Code|Evidence Code - EVID|DIVISION 6 - WITNESSES|CHAPTER 5 - Method and Scope of Examination|ARTICLE 2 - Examination of Witnesses|Section 770.

770.  Unless the interests of justice otherwise require, extrinsic evidence of a statement made by a witness that is inconsistent with any part of his testimony at the hearing shall be excluded unless:(a) The witness was so examined while testifying as to give him an opportunity to explain or to deny the statement; or(b) The witness has not been excused from giving further testimony in the action.(Enacted by Stats. 1965, Ch. 299.)
CA Ev Code § 771 (2021)
2021 California Code|Evidence Code - EVID|DIVISION 6 - WITNESSES|CHAPTER 5 - Method and Scope of Examination|ARTICLE 2 - Examination of Witnesses|Section 771.

771.  (a) Subject to subdivision (c), if a witness, either while testifying or prior thereto, uses a writing to refresh his memory with respect to any matter about which he testifies, such writing must be produced at the hearing at the request of an adverse party and, unless the writing is so produced, the testimony of the witness concerning such matter shall be stricken.(b) If the writing is produced at the hearing, the adverse party may, if he chooses, inspect the writing, cross-examine the witness concerning it, and introduce in evidence such portion of it as may be pertinent to the testimony of the witness.(c) Production of the writing is excused, and the testimony of the witness shall not be stricken, if the writing:(1) Is not in the possession or control of the witness or the party who produced his testimony concerning the matter; and(2) Was not reasonably procurable by such party through the use of the court’s process or other available means.(Enacted by Stats. 1965, Ch. 299.)
CA Ev Code § 772 (2021)
2021 California Code|Evidence Code - EVID|DIVISION 6 - WITNESSES|CHAPTER 5 - Method and Scope of Examination|ARTICLE 2 - Examination of Witnesses|Section 772.

772.  (a) The examination of a witness shall proceed in the following phases: direct examination, cross-examination, redirect examination, recross-examination, and continuing thereafter by redirect and recross-examination.(b) Unless for good cause the court otherwise directs, each phase of the examination of a witness must be concluded before the succeeding phase begins.(c) Subject to subdivision (d), a party may, in the discretion of the court, interrupt his cross-examination, redirect examination, or recross-examination of a witness, in order to examine the witness upon a matter not within the scope of a previous examination of the witness.(d) If the witness is the defendant in a criminal action, the witness may not, without his consent, be examined under direct examination by another party.(Enacted by Stats. 1965, Ch. 299.)
CA Ev Code § 773 (2021)
2021 California Code|Evidence Code - EVID|DIVISION 6 - WITNESSES|CHAPTER 5 - Method and Scope of Examination|ARTICLE 2 - Examination of Witnesses|Section 773.

773.  (a) A witness examined by one party may be cross-examined upon any matter within the scope of the direct examination by each other party to the action in such order as the court directs.(b) The cross-examination of a witness by any party whose interest is not adverse to the party calling him is subject to the same rules that are applicable to the direct examination.(Enacted by Stats. 1965, Ch. 299.)
CA Ev Code § 774 (2021)
2021 California Code|Evidence Code - EVID|DIVISION 6 - WITNESSES|CHAPTER 5 - Method and Scope of Examination|ARTICLE 2 - Examination of Witnesses|Section 774.

774.  A witness once examined cannot be reexamined as to the same matter without leave of the court, but he may be reexamined as to any new matter upon which he has been examined by another party to the action. Leave may be granted or withheld in the court’s discretion.(Enacted by Stats. 1965, Ch. 299.)
CA Ev Code § 775 (2021)
2021 California Code|Evidence Code - EVID|DIVISION 6 - WITNESSES|CHAPTER 5 - Method and Scope of Examination|ARTICLE 2 - Examination of Witnesses|Section 775.

775.  The court, on its own motion or on the motion of any party, may call witnesses and interrogate them the same as if they had been produced by a party to the action, and the parties may object to the questions asked and the evidence adduced the same as if such witnesses were called and examined by an adverse party. Such witnesses may be cross-examined by all parties to the action in such order as the court directs.(Enacted by Stats. 1965, Ch. 299.)
CA Ev Code § 776 (2021)
2021 California Code|Evidence Code - EVID|DIVISION 6 - WITNESSES|CHAPTER 5 - Method and Scope of Examination|ARTICLE 2 - Examination of Witnesses|Section 776.

776.  (a) A party to the record of any civil action, or a person identified with such a party, may be called and examined as if under cross-examination by any adverse party at any time during the presentation of evidence by the party calling the witness.(b) A witness examined by a party under this section may be cross-examined by all other parties to the action in such order as the court directs; but, subject to subdivision (e), the witness may be examined only as if under redirect examination by:(1) In the case of a witness who is a party, his own counsel and counsel for a party who is not adverse to the witness.(2) In the case of a witness who is not a party, counsel for the party with whom the witness is identified and counsel for a party who is not adverse to the party with whom the witness is identified.(c) For the purpose of this section, parties represented by the same counsel are deemed to be a single party.(d) For the purpose of this section, a person is identified with a party if he is:(1) A person for whose immediate benefit the action is prosecuted or defended by the party.(2) A director, officer, superintendent, member, agent, employee, or managing agent of the party or of a person specified in paragraph (1), or any public employee of a public entity when such public entity is the party.(3) A person who was in any of the relationships specified in paragraph (2) at the time of the act or omission giving rise to the cause of action.(4) A person who was in any of the relationships specified in paragraph (2) at the time he obtained knowledge of the matter concerning which he is sought to be examined under this section.(e) Paragraph (2) of subdivision (b) does not require counsel for the party with whom the witness is identified and counsel for a party who is not adverse to the party with whom the witness is identified to examine the witness as if under redirect examination if the party who called the witness for examination under this section:(1) Is also a person identified with the same party with whom the witness is identified.(2) Is the personal representative, heir, successor, or assignee of a person identified with the same party with whom the witness is identified.(Amended by Stats. 1967, Ch. 650.)
CA Ev Code § 777 (2021)
2021 California Code|Evidence Code - EVID|DIVISION 6 - WITNESSES|CHAPTER 5 - Method and Scope of Examination|ARTICLE 2 - Examination of Witnesses|Section 777.

777.  (a) Subject to subdivisions (b) and (c), the court may exclude from the courtroom any witness not at the time under examination so that such witness cannot hear the testimony of other witnesses.(b) A party to the action cannot be excluded under this section.(c) If a person other than a natural person is a party to the action, an officer or employee designated by its attorney is entitled to be present.(Enacted by Stats. 1965, Ch. 299.)
CA Ev Code § 778 (2021)
2021 California Code|Evidence Code - EVID|DIVISION 6 - WITNESSES|CHAPTER 5 - Method and Scope of Examination|ARTICLE 2 - Examination of Witnesses|Section 778.

778.  After a witness has been excused from giving further testimony in the action, he cannot be recalled without leave of the court. Leave may be granted or withheld in the court’s discretion.(Enacted by Stats. 1965, Ch. 299.)
CA Ev Code § 780 (2021)
2021 California Code|Evidence Code - EVID|DIVISION 6 - WITNESSES|CHAPTER 6 - Credibility of Witnesses|ARTICLE 1 - Credibility Generally|Section 780.

780.  Except as otherwise provided by statute, the court or jury may consider in determining the credibility of a witness any matter that has any tendency in reason to prove or disprove the truthfulness of his testimony at the hearing, including but not limited to any of the following:(a) His demeanor while testifying and the manner in which he testifies.(b) The character of his testimony.(c) The extent of his capacity to perceive, to recollect, or to communicate any matter about which he testifies.(d) The extent of his opportunity to perceive any matter about which he testifies.(e) His character for honesty or veracity or their opposites.(f) The existence or nonexistence of a bias, interest, or other motive.(g) A statement previously made by him that is consistent with his testimony at the hearing.(h) A statement made by him that is inconsistent with any part of his testimony at the hearing.(i) The existence or nonexistence of any fact testified to by him.(j) His attitude toward the action in which he testifies or toward the giving of testimony.(k) His admission of untruthfulness.(Enacted by Stats. 1965, Ch. 299.)
CA Ev Code § 782.1 (2021)
2021 California Code|Evidence Code - EVID|DIVISION 6 - WITNESSES|CHAPTER 6 - Credibility of Witnesses|ARTICLE 1 - Credibility Generally|Section 782.1.

782.1.  The possession of a condom is not admissible as evidence in the prosecution of a violation of Section 372 of, subdivision (a) or (b) of Section 647 of, or Section 653.22 of, the Penal Code, if the offense is related to prostitution.(Repealed and added by Stats. 2019, Ch. 141, Sec. 2. (SB 233) Effective January 1, 2020.)
CA Ev Code § 783 (2021)
2021 California Code|Evidence Code - EVID|DIVISION 6 - WITNESSES|CHAPTER 6 - Credibility of Witnesses|ARTICLE 1 - Credibility Generally|Section 783.

783.  In any civil action alleging conduct which constitutes sexual harassment, sexual assault, or sexual battery, if evidence of sexual conduct of the plaintiff is offered to attack credibility of the plaintiff under Section 780, the following procedures shall be followed:(a) A written motion shall be made by the defendant to the court and the plaintiff’s attorney stating that the defense has an offer of proof of the relevancy of evidence of the sexual conduct of the plaintiff proposed to be presented.(b) The written motion shall be accompanied by an affidavit in which the offer of proof shall be stated.(c) If the court finds that the offer of proof is sufficient, the court shall order a hearing out of the presence of the jury, if any, and at the hearing allow the questioning of the plaintiff regarding the offer of proof made by the defendant.(d) At the conclusion of the hearing, if the court finds that evidence proposed to be offered by the defendant regarding the sexual conduct of the plaintiff is relevant pursuant to Section 780, and is not inadmissible pursuant to Section 352, the court may make an order stating what evidence may be introduced by the defendant, and the nature of the questions to be permitted. The defendant may then offer evidence pursuant to the order of the court.(Added by Stats. 1985, Ch. 1328, Sec. 3.)
CA Ev Code § 785 (2021)
2021 California Code|Evidence Code - EVID|DIVISION 6 - WITNESSES|CHAPTER 6 - Credibility of Witnesses|ARTICLE 2 - Attacking or Supporting Credibility|Section 785.

785.  The credibility of a witness may be attacked or supported by any party, including the party calling him.(Enacted by Stats. 1965, Ch. 299.)
CA Ev Code § 786 (2021)
2021 California Code|Evidence Code - EVID|DIVISION 6 - WITNESSES|CHAPTER 6 - Credibility of Witnesses|ARTICLE 2 - Attacking or Supporting Credibility|Section 786.

786.  Evidence of traits of his character other than honesty or veracity, or their opposites, is inadmissible to attack or support the credibility of a witness.(Enacted by Stats. 1965, Ch. 299.)
CA Ev Code § 787 (2021)
2021 California Code|Evidence Code - EVID|DIVISION 6 - WITNESSES|CHAPTER 6 - Credibility of Witnesses|ARTICLE 2 - Attacking or Supporting Credibility|Section 787.

787.  Subject to Section 788, evidence of specific instances of his conduct relevant only as tending to prove a trait of his character is inadmissible to attack or support the credibility of a witness.(Enacted by Stats. 1965, Ch. 299.)
CA Ev Code § 788 (2021)
2021 California Code|Evidence Code - EVID|DIVISION 6 - WITNESSES|CHAPTER 6 - Credibility of Witnesses|ARTICLE 2 - Attacking or Supporting Credibility|Section 788.

788.  For the purpose of attacking the credibility of a witness, it may be shown by the examination of the witness or by the record of the judgment that he has been convicted of a felony unless:(a) A pardon based on his innocence has been granted to the witness by the jurisdiction in which he was convicted.(b) A certificate of rehabilitation and pardon has been granted to the witness under the provisions of Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 4852.01) of Title 6 of Part 3 of the Penal Code.(c) The accusatory pleading against the witness has been dismissed under the provisions of Penal Code Section 1203.4, but this exception does not apply to any criminal trial where the witness is being prosecuted for a subsequent offense. (d) The conviction was under the laws of another jurisdiction and the witness has been relieved of the penalties and disabilities arising from the conviction pursuant to a procedure substantially equivalent to that referred to in subdivision (b) or (c).(Enacted by Stats. 1965, Ch. 299.)
CA Ev Code § 789 (2021)
2021 California Code|Evidence Code - EVID|DIVISION 6 - WITNESSES|CHAPTER 6 - Credibility of Witnesses|ARTICLE 2 - Attacking or Supporting Credibility|Section 789.

789.  Evidence of his religious belief or lack thereof is inadmissible to attack or support the credibility of a witness.(Enacted by Stats. 1965, Ch. 299.)
CA Ev Code § 790 (2021)
2021 California Code|Evidence Code - EVID|DIVISION 6 - WITNESSES|CHAPTER 6 - Credibility of Witnesses|ARTICLE 2 - Attacking or Supporting Credibility|Section 790.

790.  Evidence of the good character of a witness is inadmissible to support his credibility unless evidence of his bad character has been admitted for the purpose of attacking his credibility.(Enacted by Stats. 1965, Ch. 299.)
CA Ev Code § 791 (2021)
2021 California Code|Evidence Code - EVID|DIVISION 6 - WITNESSES|CHAPTER 6 - Credibility of Witnesses|ARTICLE 2 - Attacking or Supporting Credibility|Section 791.

791.  Evidence of a statement previously made by a witness that is consistent with his testimony at the hearing is inadmissible to support his credibility unless it is offered after:(a) Evidence of a statement made by him that is inconsistent with any part of his testimony at the hearing has been admitted for the purpose of attacking his credibility, and the statement was made before the alleged inconsistent statement; or(b) An express or implied charge has been made that his testimony at the hearing is recently fabricated or is influenced by bias or other improper motive, and the statement was made before the bias, motive for fabrication, or other improper motive is alleged to have arisen.(Enacted by Stats. 1965, Ch. 299.)
CA Ev Code § 800 (2021)
2021 California Code|Evidence Code - EVID|DIVISION 7 - OPINION TESTIMONY AND SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE|CHAPTER 1 - Expert and Other Opinion Testimony|ARTICLE 1 - Expert and Other Opinion Testimony Generally|Section 800.

800.  If a witness is not testifying as an expert, his testimony in the form of an opinion is limited to such an opinion as is permitted by law, including but not limited to an opinion that is:(a) Rationally based on the perception of the witness; and(b) Helpful to a clear understanding of his testimony.(Enacted by Stats. 1965, Ch. 299.)
CA Ev Code § 801 (2021)
2021 California Code|Evidence Code - EVID|DIVISION 7 - OPINION TESTIMONY AND SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE|CHAPTER 1 - Expert and Other Opinion Testimony|ARTICLE 1 - Expert and Other Opinion Testimony Generally|Section 801.

801.  If a witness is testifying as an expert, his testimony in the form of an opinion is limited to such an opinion as is:(a) Related to a subject that is sufficiently beyond common experience that the opinion of an expert would assist the trier of fact; and(b) Based on matter (including his special knowledge, skill, experience, training, and education) perceived by or personally known to the witness or made known to him at or before the hearing, whether or not admissible, that is of a type that reasonably may be relied upon by an expert in forming an opinion upon the subject to which his testimony relates, unless an expert is precluded by law from using such matter as a basis for his opinion.(Enacted by Stats. 1965, Ch. 299.)
CA Ev Code § 802 (2021)
2021 California Code|Evidence Code - EVID|DIVISION 7 - OPINION TESTIMONY AND SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE|CHAPTER 1 - Expert and Other Opinion Testimony|ARTICLE 1 - Expert and Other Opinion Testimony Generally|Section 802.

802.  A witness testifying in the form of an opinion may state on direct examination the reasons for his opinion and the matter (including, in the case of an expert, his special knowledge, skill, experience, training, and education) upon which it is based, unless he is precluded by law from using such reasons or matter as a basis for his opinion. The court in its discretion may require that a witness before testifying in the form of an opinion be first examined concerning the matter upon which his opinion is based.(Enacted by Stats. 1965, Ch. 299.)
CA Ev Code § 803 (2021)
2021 California Code|Evidence Code - EVID|DIVISION 7 - OPINION TESTIMONY AND SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE|CHAPTER 1 - Expert and Other Opinion Testimony|ARTICLE 1 - Expert and Other Opinion Testimony Generally|Section 803.

803.  The court may, and upon objection shall, exclude testimony in the form of an opinion that is based in whole or in significant part on matter that is not a proper basis for such an opinion. In such case, the witness may, if there remains a proper basis for his opinion, then state his opinion after excluding from consideration the matter determined to be improper.(Enacted by Stats. 1965, Ch. 299.)
CA Ev Code § 804 (2021)
2021 California Code|Evidence Code - EVID|DIVISION 7 - OPINION TESTIMONY AND SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE|CHAPTER 1 - Expert and Other Opinion Testimony|ARTICLE 1 - Expert and Other Opinion Testimony Generally|Section 804.

804.  (a) If a witness testifying as an expert testifies that his opinion is based in whole or in part upon the opinion or statement of another person, such other person may be called and examined by any adverse party as if under cross-examination concerning the opinion or statement.(b) This section is not applicable if the person upon whose opinion or statement the expert witness has relied is (1) a party, (2) a person identified with a party within the meaning of subdivision (d) of Section 776, or (3) a witness who has testified in the action concerning the subject matter of the opinion or statement upon which the expert witness has relied.(c) Nothing in this section makes admissible an expert opinion that is inadmissible because it is based in whole or in part on the opinion or statement of another person.(d) An expert opinion otherwise admissible is not made inadmissible by this section because it is based on the opinion or statement of a person who is unavailable for examination pursuant to this section.(Enacted by Stats. 1965, Ch. 299.)
CA Ev Code § 805 (2021)
2021 California Code|Evidence Code - EVID|DIVISION 7 - OPINION TESTIMONY AND SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE|CHAPTER 1 - Expert and Other Opinion Testimony|ARTICLE 1 - Expert and Other Opinion Testimony Generally|Section 805.

805.  Testimony in the form of an opinion that is otherwise admissible is not objectionable because it embraces the ultimate issue to be decided by the trier of fact.(Enacted by Stats. 1965, Ch. 299.)
CA Ev Code § 810 (2021)
2021 California Code|Evidence Code - EVID|DIVISION 7 - OPINION TESTIMONY AND SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE|CHAPTER 1 - Expert and Other Opinion Testimony|ARTICLE 2 - Evidence of Market Value of Property|Section 810.

810.  (a) Except where another rule is provided by statute, this article provides special rules of evidence applicable to any action in which the value of property is to be ascertained.(b) This article does not govern ad valorem property tax assessment or equalization proceedings.(Amended by Stats. 1980, Ch. 381.)
CA Ev Code § 811 (2021)
2021 California Code|Evidence Code - EVID|DIVISION 7 - OPINION TESTIMONY AND SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE|CHAPTER 1 - Expert and Other Opinion Testimony|ARTICLE 2 - Evidence of Market Value of Property|Section 811.

811.  As used in this article, “value of property” means market value of any of the following:(a) Real property or any interest therein.(b)  Real property or any interest therein and tangible personal property valued as a unit.(Amended by Stats. 1980, Ch. 381.)
CA Ev Code § 812 (2021)
2021 California Code|Evidence Code - EVID|DIVISION 7 - OPINION TESTIMONY AND SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE|CHAPTER 1 - Expert and Other Opinion Testimony|ARTICLE 2 - Evidence of Market Value of Property|Section 812.

812.  This article is not intended to alter or change the existing substantive law, whether statutory or decisional, interpreting the meaning of “market value,” whether denominated “fair market value” or otherwise.(Amended by Stats. 1978, Ch. 294.)
CA Ev Code § 813 (2021)
2021 California Code|Evidence Code - EVID|DIVISION 7 - OPINION TESTIMONY AND SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE|CHAPTER 1 - Expert and Other Opinion Testimony|ARTICLE 2 - Evidence of Market Value of Property|Section 813.

813.  (a) The value of property may be shown only by the opinions of any of the following:(1) Witnesses qualified to express such opinions.(2) The owner or the spouse of the owner of the property or property interest being valued.(3) An officer, regular employee, or partner designated by a corporation, partnership, or unincorporated association that is the owner of the property or property interest being valued, if the designee is knowledgeable as to the value of the property or property interest.(b) Nothing in this section prohibits a view of the property being valued or the admission of any other admissible evidence (including but not limited to evidence as to the nature and condition of the property and, in an eminent domain proceeding, the character of the improvement proposed to be constructed by the plaintiff) for the limited purpose of enabling the court, jury, or referee to understand and weigh the testimony given under subdivision (a); and such evidence, except evidence of the character of the improvement proposed to be constructed by the plaintiff in an eminent domain proceeding, is subject to impeachment and rebuttal.(c) For the purposes of subdivision (a), “owner of the property or property interest being valued” includes, but is not limited to, the following persons: (1) A person entitled to possession of the property.(2) Either party in an action or proceeding to determine the ownership of the property between the parties if the court determines that it would not be in the interest of efficient administration of justice to determine the issue of ownership prior to the admission of the opinion of the party.(Amended by Stats. 1980, Ch. 381.)