reglab/housing_qa huggingface dataset:
IN Code § 35-41-2-2 (2021)
2021 Indiana Code|Title 35. Criminal Law and Procedure|Article 41. Substantive Criminal Provisions|Chapter 2. Basis of Criminal Liability|35-41-2-2. Culpability

Sec. 2. (a) A person engages in conduct "intentionally" if, when he engages in the conduct, it is his conscious objective to do so.(b) A person engages in conduct "knowingly" if, when he engages in the conduct, he is aware of a high probability that he is doing so.(c) A person engages in conduct "recklessly" if he engages in the conduct in plain, conscious, and unjustifiable disregard of harm that might result and the disregard involves a substantial deviation from acceptable standards of conduct.(d) Unless the statute defining the offense provides otherwise, if a kind of culpability is required for commission of an offense, it is required with respect to every material element of the prohibited conduct.As added by Acts 1976, P.L.148, SEC.1. Amended by Acts 1977, P.L.340, SEC.4.
IN Code § 35-41-2-3 (2021)
2021 Indiana Code|Title 35. Criminal Law and Procedure|Article 41. Substantive Criminal Provisions|Chapter 2. Basis of Criminal Liability|35-41-2-3. Liability of Corporation, Partnership, or Unincorporated Association

Sec. 3. (a) A corporation, limited liability company, partnership, or unincorporated association may be prosecuted for any offense; it may be convicted of an offense only if it is proved that the offense was committed by its agent acting within the scope of his authority.(b) Recovery of a fine, costs (including fees), or forfeiture from a corporation, limited liability company, partnership, or unincorporated association is limited to the property of the corporation, limited liability company, partnership, or unincorporated association.As added by Acts 1976, P.L.148, SEC.1. Amended by Acts 1977, P.L.340, SEC.5; P.L.8-1993, SEC.510; P.L.106-2010, SEC.14.
IN Code § 35-41-2-4 (2021)
2021 Indiana Code|Title 35. Criminal Law and Procedure|Article 41. Substantive Criminal Provisions|Chapter 2. Basis of Criminal Liability|35-41-2-4. Aiding, Inducing, or Causing an Offense

Sec. 4. A person who knowingly or intentionally aids, induces, or causes another person to commit an offense commits that offense, even if the other person:(1) has not been prosecuted for the offense;(2) has not been convicted of the offense; or(3) has been acquitted of the offense.As added by Acts 1976, P.L.148, SEC.1. Amended by Acts 1977, P.L.340, SEC.6.
IN Code § 35-41-2-5 (2021)
2021 Indiana Code|Title 35. Criminal Law and Procedure|Article 41. Substantive Criminal Provisions|Chapter 2. Basis of Criminal Liability|35-41-2-5. Intoxication

Sec. 5. Intoxication is not a defense in a prosecution for an offense and may not be taken into consideration in determining the existence of a mental state that is an element of the offense unless the defendant meets the requirements of IC 35-41-3-5.As added by P.L.210-1997, SEC.3.
IN Code § 35-41-2-6 (2021)
2021 Indiana Code|Title 35. Criminal Law and Procedure|Article 41. Substantive Criminal Provisions|Chapter 2. Basis of Criminal Liability|35-41-2-6. Penalty for Certain Offenses

Sec. 6. (a) This section applies to an offense with a penalty that may be enhanced due to the value of the property involved in the offense.(b) Offenses that are committed in a thirty (30) day period may be charged in a single count. The value of property involved in offenses:(1) committed in a thirty (30) day period; and(2) charged in a single count;may be aggregated.As added by P.L.166-2017, SEC.1.
IN Code § 35-41-3-1 (2021)
2021 Indiana Code|Title 35. Criminal Law and Procedure|Article 41. Substantive Criminal Provisions|Chapter 3. Defenses Relating to Culpability|35-41-3-1. Legal Authority

Sec. 1. A person is justified in engaging in conduct otherwise prohibited if he has legal authority to do so.As added by Acts 1976, P.L.148, SEC.1. Amended by Acts 1977, P.L.340, SEC.7.
IN Code § 35-41-3-3 (2021)
2021 Indiana Code|Title 35. Criminal Law and Procedure|Article 41. Substantive Criminal Provisions|Chapter 3. Defenses Relating to Culpability|35-41-3-3. Use of Force Relating to Arrest or Escape

Sec. 3. (a) The following definitions apply throughout this section:(1) "Chokehold" means applying pressure to the throat or neck of another person in a manner intended to obstruct the airway of the other person.(2) "Deadly force" includes a chokehold.(b) A person other than a law enforcement officer is justified in using reasonable force against another person to effect an arrest or prevent the other person's escape if:(1) a felony has been committed; and(2) there is probable cause to believe the other person committed that felony.However, such a person is not justified in using deadly force unless that force is justified under section 2 of this chapter.(c) A law enforcement officer is justified in using reasonable force if the officer reasonably believes that the force is necessary to enforce a criminal law or to effect a lawful arrest. However, an officer is justified in using deadly force only if the officer:(1) has probable cause to believe that that deadly force is necessary:(A) to prevent the commission of a forcible felony; or(B) to effect an arrest of a person who the officer has probable cause to believe poses a threat of serious bodily injury to the officer or a third person; and(2) has given a warning, if feasible, to the person against whom the deadly force is to be used.(d) A law enforcement officer making an arrest under an invalid warrant is justified in using force as if the warrant was valid, unless the officer knows that the warrant is invalid.(e) A law enforcement officer who has an arrested person in custody is justified in using the same force to prevent the escape of the arrested person from custody that the officer would be justified in using if the officer was arresting that person. However, an officer is justified in using deadly force only if the officer:(1) has probable cause to believe that deadly force is necessary to prevent the escape from custody of a person who the officer has probable cause to believe poses a threat of serious bodily injury to the officer or a third person; and(2) has given a warning, if feasible, to the person against whom the deadly force is to be used.(f) A guard or other official in a penal facility or a law enforcement officer is justified in using reasonable force, including deadly force, if the officer has probable cause to believe that the force is necessary to prevent the escape of a person who is detained in the penal facility.(g) Notwithstanding subsection (c), (e), or (f), a guard, penal facility official, or law enforcement officer who is a defendant in a criminal prosecution has the same right as a person who is not a guard, penal facility official, or law enforcement officer to assert self-defense under IC 35-41-3-2.As added by Acts 1976, P.L.148, SEC.1. Amended by Acts 1977, P.L.340, SEC.9; Acts 1979, P.L.297, SEC.2; P.L.245-1993, SEC.1; P.L.12-2021, SEC.7.
IN Code § 35-41-3-5 (2021)
2021 Indiana Code|Title 35. Criminal Law and Procedure|Article 41. Substantive Criminal Provisions|Chapter 3. Defenses Relating to Culpability|35-41-3-5. Intoxication

Sec. 5. It is a defense that the person who engaged in the prohibited conduct did so while he was intoxicated, only if the intoxication resulted from the introduction of a substance into his body:(1) without his consent; or(2) when he did not know that the substance might cause intoxication.As added by Acts 1976, P.L.148, SEC.1. Amended by Acts 1977, P.L.340, SEC.10; Acts 1980, P.L.205, SEC.1; P.L.210-1997, SEC.4.
IN Code § 35-41-3-6 (2021)
2021 Indiana Code|Title 35. Criminal Law and Procedure|Article 41. Substantive Criminal Provisions|Chapter 3. Defenses Relating to Culpability|35-41-3-6. Mental Disease or Defect

Sec. 6. (a) A person is not responsible for having engaged in prohibited conduct if, as a result of mental disease or defect, he was unable to appreciate the wrongfulness of the conduct at the time of the offense.(b) As used in this section, "mental disease or defect" means a severely abnormal mental condition that grossly and demonstrably impairs a person's perception, but the term does not include an abnormality manifested only by repeated unlawful or antisocial conduct.As added by Acts 1976, P.L.148, SEC.1. Amended by Acts 1977, P.L.340, SEC.11; P.L.184-1984, SEC.1.
IN Code § 35-41-3-7 (2021)
2021 Indiana Code|Title 35. Criminal Law and Procedure|Article 41. Substantive Criminal Provisions|Chapter 3. Defenses Relating to Culpability|35-41-3-7. Mistake of Fact

Sec. 7. It is a defense that the person who engaged in the prohibited conduct was reasonably mistaken about a matter of fact, if the mistake negates the culpability required for commission of the offense.As added by Acts 1976, P.L.148, SEC.1. Amended by Acts 1977, P.L.340, SEC.12.
IN Code § 35-41-3-8 (2021)
2021 Indiana Code|Title 35. Criminal Law and Procedure|Article 41. Substantive Criminal Provisions|Chapter 3. Defenses Relating to Culpability|35-41-3-8. Duress

Sec. 8. (a) It is a defense that the person who engaged in the prohibited conduct was compelled to do so by threat of imminent serious bodily injury to himself or another person. With respect to offenses other than felonies, it is a defense that the person who engaged in the prohibited conduct was compelled to do so by force or threat of force. Compulsion under this section exists only if the force, threat, or circumstances are such as would render a person of reasonable firmness incapable of resisting the pressure.(b) This section does not apply to a person who:(1) recklessly, knowingly, or intentionally placed himself in a situation in which it was foreseeable that he would be subjected to duress; or(2) committed an offense against the person as defined in IC 35-42.As added by Acts 1976, P.L.148, SEC.1. Amended by Acts 1977, P.L.340, SEC.13.
IN Code § 35-41-3-9 (2021)
2021 Indiana Code|Title 35. Criminal Law and Procedure|Article 41. Substantive Criminal Provisions|Chapter 3. Defenses Relating to Culpability|35-41-3-9. Entrapment

Sec. 9. (a) It is a defense that:(1) the prohibited conduct of the person was the product of a law enforcement officer, or his agent, using persuasion or other means likely to cause the person to engage in the conduct; and(2) the person was not predisposed to commit the offense.(b) Conduct merely affording a person an opportunity to commit the offense does not constitute entrapment.As added by Acts 1976, P.L.148, SEC.1. Amended by Acts 1977, P.L.340, SEC.14.
IN Code § 35-41-3-10 (2021)
2021 Indiana Code|Title 35. Criminal Law and Procedure|Article 41. Substantive Criminal Provisions|Chapter 3. Defenses Relating to Culpability|35-41-3-10. Abandonment

Sec. 10. With respect to a charge under IC 35-41-2-4, IC 35-41-5-1, or IC 35-41-5-2, it is a defense that the person who engaged in the prohibited conduct voluntarily abandoned his effort to commit the underlying crime and voluntarily prevented its commission.As added by Acts 1976, P.L.148, SEC.1. Amended by Acts 1977, P.L.340, SEC.15.
IN Code § 35-41-3-11 (2021)
2021 Indiana Code|Title 35. Criminal Law and Procedure|Article 41. Substantive Criminal Provisions|Chapter 3. Defenses Relating to Culpability|35-41-3-11. Mental Disease or Defect; Use of Justifiable Reasonable Force

Sec. 11. (a) As used in this section, "defendant" refers to an individual charged with any crime involving the use of force against a person.(b) This section applies under the following circumstances when the defendant in a prosecution raises the issue that the defendant was at the time of the alleged crime suffering from the effects of battery as a result of the past course of conduct of the individual who is the victim of the alleged crime:(1) The defendant raises the issue that the defendant was not responsible as a result of mental disease or defect under section 6 of this chapter, rendering the defendant unable to appreciate the wrongfulness of the conduct at the time of the crime.(2) The defendant claims to have used justifiable reasonable force under section 2 of this chapter. The defendant has the burden of going forward to produce evidence from which a trier of fact could find support for the reasonableness of the defendant's belief in the imminence of the use of unlawful force or, when deadly force is employed, the imminence of serious bodily injury to the defendant or a third person or the commission of a forcible felony.(c) If a defendant proposes to claim the use of justifiable reasonable force under subsection (b)(2), the defendant must file a written motion of that intent with the trial court not later than:(1) twenty (20) days if the defendant is charged with a felony; or(2) ten (10) days if the defendant is charged only with one (1) or more misdemeanors;before the omnibus date. However, in the interest of justice and upon a showing of good cause, the court may permit the filing to be made at any time before the commencement of the trial.(d) The introduction of any expert testimony under this section shall be in accordance with the Indiana Rules of Evidence.As added by P.L.210-1997, SEC.5.
IN Code § 35-41-4-0.1 (2021)
2021 Indiana Code|Title 35. Criminal Law and Procedure|Article 41. Substantive Criminal Provisions|Chapter 4. Standard of Proof and Bars to Prosecution|35-41-4-0.1. Application of Certain Amendments to Chapter

Sec. 0.1. The following amendments to this chapter apply as follows:(1) The amendments made to section 2 of this chapter by P.L.309-1985 do not apply to violations occurring before April 9, 1985.(2) The amendments made to section 2 of this chapter by P.L.48-2001 apply to all crimes regardless of whether the crime was committed before, on, or after July 1, 2001.(3) The amendments made to section 2(f) of this chapter by P.L.97-2004 do not apply to offenses committed under IC 35-42-4-3(c) and IC 35-42-4-3(d) as those provisions existed before the amendment of IC 35-42-4-3 by P.L.79-1994.As added by P.L.220-2011, SEC.591. Amended by P.L.63-2012, SEC.45.
IN Code § 35-41-4-1 (2021)
2021 Indiana Code|Title 35. Criminal Law and Procedure|Article 41. Substantive Criminal Provisions|Chapter 4. Standard of Proof and Bars to Prosecution|35-41-4-1. Standard of Proof; Insanity Defense

Sec. 1. (a) A person may be convicted of an offense only if his guilt is proved beyond a reasonable doubt.(b) Notwithstanding subsection (a), the burden of proof is on the defendant to establish the defense of insanity (IC 35-41-3-6) by a preponderance of the evidence.As added by Acts 1976, P.L.148, SEC.1. Amended by Acts 1977, P.L.340, SEC.16; Acts 1978, P.L.145, SEC.9.
IN Code § 35-41-4-3 (2021)
2021 Indiana Code|Title 35. Criminal Law and Procedure|Article 41. Substantive Criminal Provisions|Chapter 4. Standard of Proof and Bars to Prosecution|35-41-4-3. When Prosecution Barred for Same Offense

Sec. 3. (a) A prosecution is barred if there was a former prosecution of the defendant based on the same facts and for commission of the same offense and if:(1) the former prosecution resulted in an acquittal or a conviction of the defendant (A conviction of an included offense constitutes an acquittal of the greater offense, even if the conviction is subsequently set aside.); or(2) the former prosecution was terminated after the jury was impaneled and sworn or, in a trial by the court without a jury, after the first witness was sworn, unless (i) the defendant consented to the termination or waived, by motion to dismiss or otherwise, his right to object to the termination, (ii) it was physically impossible to proceed with the trial in conformity with law, (iii) there was a legal defect in the proceedings that would make any judgment entered upon a verdict reversible as a matter of law, (iv) prejudicial conduct, in or outside the courtroom, made it impossible to proceed with the trial without injustice to either the defendant or the state, (v) the jury was unable to agree on a verdict, or (vi) false statements of a juror on voir dire prevented a fair trial.(b) If the prosecuting authority brought about any of the circumstances in subdivisions (a)(2)(i) through (a)(2)(vi) of this section, with intent to cause termination of the trial, another prosecution is barred.As added by Acts 1976, P.L.148, SEC.1. Amended by Acts 1977, P.L.340, SEC.18.
IN Code § 35-41-4-4 (2021)
2021 Indiana Code|Title 35. Criminal Law and Procedure|Article 41. Substantive Criminal Provisions|Chapter 4. Standard of Proof and Bars to Prosecution|35-41-4-4. When Prosecution Barred for Different Offense

Sec. 4. (a) A prosecution is barred if all of the following exist:(1) There was a former prosecution of the defendant for a different offense or for the same offense based on different facts.(2) The former prosecution resulted in an acquittal or a conviction of the defendant or in an improper termination under section 3 of this chapter.(3) The instant prosecution is for an offense with which the defendant should have been charged in the former prosecution.(b) A prosecution is not barred under this section if the offense on which it is based was not consummated when the trial under the former prosecution began.As added by Acts 1976, P.L.148, SEC.1. Amended by Acts 1977, P.L.340, SEC.19.
IN Code § 35-41-4-5 (2021)
2021 Indiana Code|Title 35. Criminal Law and Procedure|Article 41. Substantive Criminal Provisions|Chapter 4. Standard of Proof and Bars to Prosecution|35-41-4-5. Former Prosecution in Another Jurisdiction a Bar

Sec. 5. In a case in which the alleged conduct constitutes an offense within the concurrent jurisdiction of Indiana and another jurisdiction, a former prosecution in any other jurisdiction is a bar to a subsequent prosecution for the same conduct in Indiana, if the former prosecution resulted in an acquittal or a conviction of the defendant or in an improper termination under section 3 of this chapter.As added by Acts 1976, P.L.148, SEC.1. Amended by Acts 1977, P.L.340, SEC.20.
IN Code § 35-41-4-6 (2021)
2021 Indiana Code|Title 35. Criminal Law and Procedure|Article 41. Substantive Criminal Provisions|Chapter 4. Standard of Proof and Bars to Prosecution|35-41-4-6. Invalid or Fraudulently Procured Prosecution Not a Bar

Sec. 6. A former prosecution is not a bar under section 3, 4, or 5 of this chapter if:(1) it was before a court that lacked jurisdiction over the defendant or the offense;(2) it was procured by the defendant without the knowledge of the prosecuting authority and with intent to avoid a more severe sentence that might otherwise have been imposed; or(3) it resulted in a conviction that was set aside, reversed, vacated, or held invalid in a subsequent proceeding, unless the defendant was adjudged not guilty or ordered discharged.As added by Acts 1976, P.L.148, SEC.1. Amended by Acts 1977, P.L.340, SEC.21.
IN Code § 35-41-5-1 (2021)
2021 Indiana Code|Title 35. Criminal Law and Procedure|Article 41. Substantive Criminal Provisions|Chapter 5. Offenses of General Applicability|35-41-5-1. Attempt

Sec. 1. (a) A person attempts to commit a crime when, acting with the culpability required for commission of the crime, the person engages in conduct that constitutes a substantial step toward commission of the crime. An attempt to commit a crime is a felony or misdemeanor of the same level or class as the crime attempted. However, an attempt to commit murder is a Level 1 felony.(b) It is no defense that, because of a misapprehension of the circumstances, including the age of the intended victim in a prosecution for attempted child molesting (IC 35-42-4-3), it would have been impossible for the accused person to commit the crime attempted.(c) For purposes of subsection (a), a person engages in conduct that constitutes a substantial step if the person, with the intent to commit a sex crime against a child or an individual the person believes to be a child:(1) communicates with the child or individual the person believes to be a child concerning the sex crime; and(2) travels to another location to meet the child or individual the person believes to be a child.As added by Acts 1976, P.L.148, SEC.1. Amended by Acts 1977, P.L.340, SEC.22; P.L.158-2013, SEC.408; P.L.247-2013, SEC.5; P.L.168-2014, SEC.64.
IN Code § 35-41-5-2 (2021)
2021 Indiana Code|Title 35. Criminal Law and Procedure|Article 41. Substantive Criminal Provisions|Chapter 5. Offenses of General Applicability|35-41-5-2. Conspiracy

Sec. 2. (a) A person conspires to commit a felony when, with intent to commit the felony, the person agrees with another person to commit the felony. A conspiracy to commit a felony is a felony of the same level as the underlying felony. However, a conspiracy to commit murder is:(1) a Level 2 felony if the conspiracy does not result in the death of a person; and(2) a Level 1 felony if the conspiracy results in the death of another person.(b) The state must allege and prove that either the person or the person with whom he or she agreed performed an overt act in furtherance of the agreement.(c) It is no defense that the person with whom the accused person is alleged to have conspired:(1) has not been prosecuted;(2) has not been convicted;(3) has been acquitted;(4) has been convicted of a different crime;(5) cannot be prosecuted for any reason; or(6) lacked the capacity to commit the crime.As added by Acts 1976, P.L.148, SEC.1. Amended by Acts 1977, P.L.340, SEC.23; P.L.158-2013, SEC.409.
IN Code § 35-41-5-3 (2021)
2021 Indiana Code|Title 35. Criminal Law and Procedure|Article 41. Substantive Criminal Provisions|Chapter 5. Offenses of General Applicability|35-41-5-3. Multiple Convictions

Sec. 3. (a) A person may not be convicted of both a conspiracy and an attempt with respect to the same underlying crime.(b) A person may not be convicted of both a crime and an attempt to commit the same crime.As added by Acts 1976, P.L.148, SEC.1. Amended by Acts 1977, P.L.340, SEC.24.
IN Code § 35-42-1-0.5 (2021)
2021 Indiana Code|Title 35. Criminal Law and Procedure|Article 42. Offenses Against the Person|Chapter 1. Homicide|35-42-1-0.5. Abortions Exempt

Sec. 0.5. Sections 1, 3, and 4 of this chapter do not apply to an abortion performed in compliance with:(1) IC 16-34; or(2) IC 35-1-58.5 (before its repeal).As added by P.L.261-1997, SEC.2.
IN Code § 35-42-1-1 (2021)
2021 Indiana Code|Title 35. Criminal Law and Procedure|Article 42. Offenses Against the Person|Chapter 1. Homicide|35-42-1-1. Murder

Sec. 1. A person who:(1) knowingly or intentionally kills another human being;(2) kills another human being while committing or attempting to commit arson, burglary, child molesting, consumer product tampering, criminal deviate conduct (under IC 35-42-4-2 before its repeal), kidnapping, rape, robbery, human trafficking, promotion of human labor trafficking, promotion of human sexual trafficking, promotion of child sexual trafficking, promotion of sexual trafficking of a younger child, child sexual trafficking, or carjacking (before its repeal);(3) kills another human being while committing or attempting to commit:(A) dealing in or manufacturing cocaine or a narcotic drug (IC 35-48-4-1);(B) dealing in methamphetamine (IC 35-48-4-1.1);(C) manufacturing methamphetamine (IC 35-48-4-1.2);(D) dealing in a schedule I, II, or III controlled substance (IC 35-48-4-2);(E) dealing in a schedule IV controlled substance (IC 35-48-4-3); or(F) dealing in a schedule V controlled substance; or(4) except as provided in section 6.5 of this chapter, knowingly or intentionally kills a fetus in any stage of development;commits murder, a felony.As added by Acts 1976, P.L.148, SEC.2. Amended by Acts 1977, P.L.340, SEC.25; P.L.326-1987, SEC.2; P.L.296-1989, SEC.1; P.L.230-1993, SEC.2; P.L.261-1997, SEC.3; P.L.17-2001, SEC.15; P.L.151-2006, SEC.16; P.L.173-2006, SEC.51; P.L.1-2007, SEC.230; P.L.158-2013, SEC.410; P.L.214-2013, SEC.35; P.L.168-2014, SEC.65; P.L.252-2017, SEC.10; P.L.144-2018, SEC.18; P.L.203-2018, SEC.1; P.L.215-2018(ss), SEC.16.