reglab/housing_qa huggingface dataset:
WA Rev Code § 43.105.111 (2021)
2021 Revised Code of Washington|Title 43 - State Government—Executive|Chapter 43.105 - Consolidated Technology Services Agency.|43.105.111 - Performance targets—Plans for achieving goals—Quarterly reports to governor.

RCW 43.105.111 Performance targets—Plans for achieving goals—Quarterly reports to governor.The director shall set performance targets and approve plans for achieving measurable and specific goals for the agency. By January 2017, the appropriate organizational performance and accountability measures and performance targets shall be submitted to the governor. These measures and targets shall include measures of performance demonstrating specific and measurable improvements related to service delivery and costs, operational efficiencies, and overall customer satisfaction. The agency shall develop a dashboard of key performance measures that will be updated quarterly and made available on the agency public website.The director shall report to the governor on agency performance at least quarterly. The reports shall be included on the agency's website and accessible to the public.[ 2015 3rd sp.s. c 1 § 105; 2011 1st sp.s. c 43 § 806.]NOTES:Effective date—2015 3rd sp.s. c 1 §§ 101-109, 201-224, 406-408, 410, 501-507, 601, and 602: See note following RCW 43.105.007.Effective date—Purpose—2011 1st sp.s. c 43: See notes following RCW 43.19.003.
WA Rev Code § 43.105.205 (2021)
2021 Revised Code of Washington|Title 43 - State Government—Executive|Chapter 43.105 - Consolidated Technology Services Agency.|43.105.205 - Office of the state chief information officer—Created—Powers, duties, and functions.

RCW 43.105.205 Office of the state chief information officer—Created—Powers, duties, and functions.(1) The office of the state chief information officer is created within the consolidated technology services agency.(2) The primary duties of the office are:(a) To prepare and lead the implementation of a strategic direction and enterprise architecture for information technology for state government;(b) To establish standards and policies for the consistent and efficient operation of information technology services throughout state government;(c) To establish statewide enterprise architecture that will serve as the organizing standard for information technology for state agencies;(d) To educate and inform state managers and policymakers on technological developments, industry trends and best practices, industry benchmarks that strengthen decision making and professional development, and industry understanding for public managers and decision makers; and(e) To perform all other matters and things necessary to carry out the purposes and provisions of this chapter.(3) In the case of institutions of higher education, the powers of the office and the provisions of this chapter apply to business and administrative applications but do not apply to (a) academic and research applications; and (b) medical, clinical, and health care applications, including the business and administrative applications for such operations. However, institutions of higher education must disclose to the office any proposed academic applications that are enterprise-wide in nature relative to the needs and interests of other institutions of higher education. Institutions of higher education shall provide to the director sufficient data and information on proposed expenditures on business and administrative applications to permit the director to evaluate the proposed expenditures pursuant to RCW 43.88.092(3).(4) The legislature and the judiciary, which are constitutionally recognized as separate branches of government, are strongly encouraged to coordinate with the office and participate in shared services initiatives and the development of enterprise-based strategies, where appropriate. Legislative and judicial agencies of the state shall submit to the director information on proposed information technology expenditures to allow the director to evaluate the proposed expenditures on an advisory basis.[ 2015 3rd sp.s. c 1 § 201; 2013 2nd sp.s. c 33 § 3; 2011 1st sp.s. c 43 § 702. Formerly RCW 43.41A.010.]NOTES:Effective date—2015 3rd sp.s. c 1 §§ 101-109, 201-224, 406-408, 410, 501-507, 601, and 602: See note following RCW 43.105.007.Effective date—Purpose—2011 1st sp.s. c 43: See notes following RCW 43.19.003.
WA Rev Code § 43.105.220 (2021)
2021 Revised Code of Washington|Title 43 - State Government—Executive|Chapter 43.105 - Consolidated Technology Services Agency.|43.105.220 - Strategic information technology plan—Biennial performance reports.

RCW 43.105.220 Strategic information technology plan—Biennial performance reports.(1) The office shall prepare a state strategic information technology plan which shall establish a statewide mission, goals, and objectives for the use of information technology, including goals for electronic access to government records, information, and services. The plan shall be developed in accordance with the standards and policies established by the office. The office shall seek the advice of the board in the development of this plan.The plan shall be updated as necessary and submitted to the governor and the legislature.(2) The office shall prepare a biennial state performance report on information technology based on state agency performance reports required under RCW 43.105.235 and other information deemed appropriate by the office. The report shall include, but not be limited to:(a) An analysis, based upon agency portfolios, of the state's information technology infrastructure, including its value, condition, and capacity;(b) An evaluation of performance relating to information technology;(c) An assessment of progress made toward implementing the state strategic information technology plan, including progress toward electronic access to public information and enabling citizens to have two-way access to public records, information, and services; and(d) An analysis of the success or failure, feasibility, progress, costs, and timeliness of implementation of major information technology projects under RCW 43.105.245. At a minimum, the portion of the report regarding major technology projects must include:(i) The total cost data for the entire life-cycle of the project, including capital and operational costs, broken down by staffing costs, contracted service, hardware purchase or lease, software purchase or lease, travel, and training. The original budget must also be shown for comparison;(ii) The original proposed project schedule and the final actual project schedule;(iii) Data regarding progress towards meeting the original goals and performance measures of the project;(iv) Discussion of lessons learned on the project, performance of any contractors used, and reasons for project delays or cost increases; and(v) Identification of benefits generated by major information technology projects developed under RCW 43.105.245.Copies of the report shall be distributed biennially to the governor and the legislature. The major technology section of the report must examine major information technology projects completed in the previous biennium.[ 2015 3rd sp.s. c 1 § 203; 2011 1st sp.s. c 43 § 707. Formerly RCW 43.41A.030.]NOTES:Effective date—2015 3rd sp.s. c 1 §§ 101-109, 201-224, 406-408, 410, 501-507, 601, and 602: See note following RCW 43.105.007.Effective date—Purpose—2011 1st sp.s. c 43: See notes following RCW 43.19.003.
WA Rev Code § 43.105.225 (2021)
2021 Revised Code of Washington|Title 43 - State Government—Executive|Chapter 43.105 - Consolidated Technology Services Agency.|43.105.225 - Managing information technology as a statewide portfolio.

RCW 43.105.225 Managing information technology as a statewide portfolio.Management of information technology across state government requires managing resources and business processes across multiple agencies. It is no longer sufficient to pursue efficiencies within agency or individual business process boundaries. The state must manage the business process changes and information technology in support of business processes as a statewide portfolio. The director will use agency information technology portfolio planning as input to develop a statewide portfolio to guide resource allocation and prioritization decisions.[ 2015 3rd sp.s. c 1 § 204; 2011 1st sp.s. c 43 § 708. Formerly RCW 43.41A.035.]NOTES:Effective date—2015 3rd sp.s. c 1 §§ 101-109, 201-224, 406-408, 410, 501-507, 601, and 602: See note following RCW 43.105.007.Effective date—Purpose—2011 1st sp.s. c 43: See notes following RCW 43.19.003.
WA Rev Code § 43.105.230 (2021)
2021 Revised Code of Washington|Title 43 - State Government—Executive|Chapter 43.105 - Consolidated Technology Services Agency.|43.105.230 - State agency information technology portfolio—Basis for decisions and plans.

RCW 43.105.230 State agency information technology portfolio—Basis for decisions and plans.A state agency information technology portfolio shall serve as the basis for making information technology decisions and plans which may include, but are not limited to:(1) System refurbishment, acquisitions, and development efforts;(2) Setting goals and objectives for using information technology;(3) Assessments of information processing performance, resources, and capabilities;(4) Ensuring the appropriate transfer of technological expertise for the operation of new systems developed using external resources;(5) Guiding new investment demand, prioritization, selection, performance, and asset value of technology and telecommunications; and(6) Progress toward providing electronic access to public information.[ 2015 3rd sp.s. c 1 § 205; 2011 1st sp.s. c 43 § 709. Formerly RCW 43.41A.040.]NOTES:Effective date—2015 3rd sp.s. c 1 §§ 101-109, 201-224, 406-408, 410, 501-507, 601, and 602: See note following RCW 43.105.007.Effective date—Purpose—2011 1st sp.s. c 43: See notes following RCW 43.19.003.
WA Rev Code § 43.105.235 (2021)
2021 Revised Code of Washington|Title 43 - State Government—Executive|Chapter 43.105 - Consolidated Technology Services Agency.|43.105.235 - State agency information technology portfolio—Exemptions.

RCW 43.105.235 State agency information technology portfolio—Exemptions.(1) Each state agency shall develop an information technology portfolio consistent with RCW 43.105.341. The superintendent of public instruction shall develop its portfolio in conjunction with educational service districts and statewide or regional providers of K-12 education information technology services.(2) The director may exempt any state agency from any or all of the requirements of this section.[ 2015 3rd sp.s. c 1 § 206; 2011 1st sp.s. c 43 § 710. Formerly RCW 43.41A.045.]NOTES:Effective date—2015 3rd sp.s. c 1 §§ 101-109, 201-224, 406-408, 410, 501-507, 601, and 602: See note following RCW 43.105.007.Effective date—Purpose—2011 1st sp.s. c 43: See notes following RCW 43.19.003.
WA Rev Code § 43.105.240 (2021)
2021 Revised Code of Washington|Title 43 - State Government—Executive|Chapter 43.105 - Consolidated Technology Services Agency.|43.105.240 - Evaluation of agency information technology spending and budget requests.

RCW 43.105.240 Evaluation of agency information technology spending and budget requests.(1) Pursuant to RCW 43.88.092(3), at the request of the director of financial management, the office shall evaluate both state agency information technology current spending and technology budget requests, including those proposed by the superintendent of public instruction, in conjunction with educational service districts, or statewide or regional providers of K-12 education information technology services. The office shall submit recommendations for funding all or part of such requests to the director of financial management. The office shall also submit recommendations regarding consolidation and coordination of similar proposals or other efficiencies it finds in reviewing proposals.(2) The office shall establish criteria, consistent with portfolio-based information technology management, for the evaluation of agency budget requests under this section. Technology budget requests shall be evaluated in the context of the state's information technology portfolio; technology initiatives underlying budget requests are subject to review by the office. Criteria shall include, but not be limited to: Feasibility of the proposed projects, consistency with the state strategic information technology plan and the state enterprise architecture, consistency with information technology portfolios, appropriate provision for public electronic access to information, evidence of business process streamlining and gathering of business and technical requirements, services, duration of investment, costs, and benefits.[ 2015 3rd sp.s. c 1 § 207; 2011 1st sp.s. c 43 § 711. Formerly RCW 43.41A.050.]NOTES:Effective date—2015 3rd sp.s. c 1 §§ 101-109, 201-224, 406-408, 410, 501-507, 601, and 602: See note following RCW 43.105.007.Effective date—Purpose—2011 1st sp.s. c 43: See notes following RCW 43.19.003.
WA Rev Code § 43.105.245 (2021)
2021 Revised Code of Washington|Title 43 - State Government—Executive|Chapter 43.105 - Consolidated Technology Services Agency.|43.105.245 - Planning, implementation, and evaluation of major projects—Standards and policies.

RCW 43.105.245 Planning, implementation, and evaluation of major projects—Standards and policies.(1) The office shall establish standards and policies governing the planning, implementation, and evaluation of major information technology projects, including those proposed by the superintendent of public instruction, in conjunction with educational service districts, or statewide or regional providers of K-12 education information technology services. The standards and policies shall:(a) Establish criteria to identify projects which are subject to this section. Such criteria shall include, but not be limited to, significant anticipated cost, complexity, or statewide significance of the project; and(b) Establish a model process and procedures which state agencies shall follow in developing and implementing projects within their information technology portfolios. This process may include project oversight experts or panels, as appropriate. State agencies may propose, for approval by the office, a process and procedures unique to the agency. The office may accept or require modification of such agency proposals or the office may reject those proposals and require use of the model process and procedures established under this subsection. Any process and procedures developed under this subsection shall require (i) distinct and identifiable phases upon which funding may be based, (ii) user validation of products through system demonstrations and testing of prototypes and deliverables, and (iii) other elements identified by the office.The director may suspend or terminate a major project, and direct that the project funds be placed into unallotted reserve status, if the director determines that the project is not meeting or is not expected to meet anticipated performance standards.(2) The office of financial management shall establish policies and standards consistent with portfolio-based information technology management to govern the funding of projects developed under this section. The policies and standards shall provide for:(a) Funding of a project under terms and conditions mutually agreed to by the director, the director of financial management, and the head of the agency proposing the project. However, the office of financial management may require incremental funding of a project on a phase-by-phase basis whereby funds for a given phase of a project may be released only when the office of financial management determines, with the advice of the director, that the previous phase is satisfactorily completed; and(b) Other elements deemed necessary by the office of financial management.[ 2015 3rd sp.s. c 1 § 208; 2011 1st sp.s. c 43 § 712. Formerly RCW 43.41A.055.]NOTES:Effective date—2015 3rd sp.s. c 1 §§ 101-109, 201-224, 406-408, 410, 501-507, 601, and 602: See note following RCW 43.105.007.Effective date—Purpose—2011 1st sp.s. c 43: See notes following RCW 43.19.003.
WA Rev Code § 43.105.255 (2021)
2021 Revised Code of Washington|Title 43 - State Government—Executive|Chapter 43.105 - Consolidated Technology Services Agency.|43.105.255 - Major technology projects and services—Approval.

RCW 43.105.255 Major technology projects and services—Approval.(1) Prior to making a commitment to purchase, acquire, or develop a major information technology project or service, state agencies must provide a proposal to the office outlining the business case of the proposed product or service, including the up-front and ongoing cost of the proposal.(2) Within thirty days of receipt of a proposal, the office shall approve the proposal, reject it, or propose modifications.(3) In reviewing a proposal, the office must determine whether the product or service is consistent with:(a) The standards and policies developed by the director pursuant to RCW 43.105.054; and(b) The state's enterprise-based strategy.(4) If a substantially similar product or service is offered by the agency, the director may require the state agency to procure the product or service through the agency, if doing so would benefit the state as an enterprise.(5) The office shall provide guidance to state agencies as to what threshold of information technology spending constitutes a major information technology product or service under this section.[ 2015 3rd sp.s. c 1 § 209; 2011 1st sp.s. c 43 § 713. Formerly RCW 43.41A.060.]NOTES:Effective date—2015 3rd sp.s. c 1 §§ 101-109, 201-224, 406-408, 410, 501-507, 601, and 602: See note following RCW 43.105.007.Effective date—Purpose—2011 1st sp.s. c 43: See notes following RCW 43.19.003.
WA Rev Code § 43.105.265 (2021)
2021 Revised Code of Washington|Title 43 - State Government—Executive|Chapter 43.105 - Consolidated Technology Services Agency.|43.105.265 - Enterprise-based strategy for information technology—Use of ongoing enterprise architecture program.

RCW 43.105.265 Enterprise-based strategy for information technology—Use of ongoing enterprise architecture program.(1) The office shall develop an enterprise-based strategy for information technology in state government informed by portfolio management planning and information technology expenditure information collected from state agencies pursuant to RCW 43.88.092.(2)(a) The office shall develop an ongoing enterprise architecture program for translating business vision and strategy into effective enterprise change. This program will create, communicate, and improve the key principles and models that describe the enterprise's future state and enable its evolution, in keeping with the priorities of government and the information technology strategic plan.(b) The enterprise architecture program will facilitate business process collaboration among agencies statewide; improving the reliability, interoperability, and sustainability of the business processes that state agencies use.In developing an enterprise-based strategy for the state, the office is encouraged to consider the following strategies as possible opportunities for achieving greater efficiency:(i) Developing evaluation criteria for deciding which common enterprise-wide business processes should become managed as enterprise services;(ii) Developing a road map of priorities for creating enterprise services;(iii) Developing decision criteria for determining implementation criteria for centralized or decentralized enterprise services;(iv) Developing evaluation criteria for deciding which technology investments to continue, hold, or drop; and(v) Performing such other duties as may be needed to promote effective enterprise change.(c) The office will establish performance measurement criteria for each of its initiatives; will measure the success of those initiatives; and will assess its quarterly results with the director to determine whether to continue, revise, or disband the initiative.[ 2015 3rd sp.s. c 1 § 210; 2011 1st sp.s. c 43 § 714. Formerly RCW 43.41A.065.]NOTES:Effective date—2015 3rd sp.s. c 1 §§ 101-109, 201-224, 406-408, 410, 501-507, 601, and 602: See note following RCW 43.105.007.Effective date—Purpose—2011 1st sp.s. c 43: See notes following RCW 43.19.003.
WA Rev Code § 43.105.285 (2021)
2021 Revised Code of Washington|Title 43 - State Government—Executive|Chapter 43.105 - Consolidated Technology Services Agency.|43.105.285 - Technology services board—Created—Composition.

RCW 43.105.285 Technology services board—Created—Composition.(1) The technology services board is created within the agency.(2) The board shall be composed of thirteen members. Six members shall be appointed by the governor, three of whom shall be representatives of state agencies or institutions, and three of whom shall be representatives of the private sector. Of the state agency representatives, at least one of the representatives must have direct experience using the software projects overseen by the board or reasonably expect to use the new software developed under the oversight of the board. Two members shall represent the house of representatives and shall be selected by the speaker of the house of representatives with one representative chosen from each major caucus of the house of representatives; two members shall represent the senate and shall be appointed by the president of the senate with one representative chosen from each major caucus of the senate. One member shall be the director who shall be a voting member of the board and serve as chair. Two nonvoting members with information technology expertise must be appointed by the governor as follows:(a) One member representing state agency bargaining units shall be selected from a list of three names submitted by each of the general government exclusive bargaining representatives; and(b) One member representing local governments shall be selected from a list of three names submitted by commonly recognized local government organizations.The governor may reject all recommendations and request new recommendations.(3) Of the initial members, three must be appointed for a one-year term, three must be appointed for a two-year term, and four must be appointed for a three-year term. Thereafter, members must be appointed for three-year terms.(4) Vacancies shall be filled in the same manner that the original appointments were made for the remainder of the member's term.(5) Members of the board shall be reimbursed for travel expenses as provided in RCW 43.03.050 and 43.03.060.(6) The office shall provide staff support to the board.[ 2015 3rd sp.s. c 1 § 211; 2011 1st sp.s. c 43 § 715. Formerly RCW 43.41A.070.]NOTES:Effective date—2015 3rd sp.s. c 1 §§ 101-109, 201-224, 406-408, 410, 501-507, 601, and 602: See note following RCW 43.105.007.Effective date—Purpose—2011 1st sp.s. c 43: See notes following RCW 43.19.003.
WA Rev Code § 43.105.341 (2021)
2021 Revised Code of Washington|Title 43 - State Government—Executive|Chapter 43.105 - Consolidated Technology Services Agency.|43.105.341 - Information technology portfolios.

RCW 43.105.341 Information technology portfolios.Information technology portfolios shall reflect (1) links among an agency's objectives, business plan, and technology; (2) analysis of the effect of an agency's proposed new technology investments on its existing infrastructure and business functions; and (3) analysis of the effect of proposed information technology investments on the state's information technology infrastructure.[ 1999 c 80 § 2. Formerly RCW 43.41A.110, 43.105.172.]