reglab/housing_qa huggingface dataset:
OR Rev Stat § 197.434 (2021)
2021 Oregon Revised Statutes|Volume : 05 - State Government, Government Procedures, Land Use|Chapter 197 - Comprehensive Land Use Planning I|Section 197.434 - Traffic impacts of speedway destination.

(1) The private developer of the speedway destination site is financially responsible for addressing, through traffic infrastructure improvements and upgrades, adverse traffic impacts that cannot be adequately mitigated, in the judgment of road authorities, through the use of temporary traffic management measures. (2) The private developer, or the organizer of a specific event or activity at the speedway destination site, is financially responsible for temporary traffic management measures required to mitigate the adverse traffic impacts of events or activities at the speedway destination site. (3) Notwithstanding subsections (1) and (2) of this section, transportation infrastructure projects required by the establishment and use of the major motor speedway may receive funding from any source of moneys for transportation infrastructure projects. [2005 c.842 §3] Note: See note under 197.431.
OR Rev Stat § 197.440 (2021)
2021 Oregon Revised Statutes|Volume : 05 - State Government, Government Procedures, Land Use|Chapter 197 - Comprehensive Land Use Planning I|Section 197.440 - Legislative findings.

The Legislative Assembly finds that: (1) It is the policy of this state to promote Oregon as a vacation destination and to encourage tourism as a valuable segment of our state’s economy; (2) There is a growing need to provide year-round destination resort accommodations to attract visitors and encourage them to stay longer. The establishment of destination resorts will provide jobs for Oregonians and contribute to the state’s economic development; (3) It is a difficult and costly process to site and establish destination resorts in rural areas of this state; and (4) The siting of destination resort facilities is an issue of statewide concern. [1987 c.886 §2]
OR Rev Stat § 197.450 (2021)
2021 Oregon Revised Statutes|Volume : 05 - State Government, Government Procedures, Land Use|Chapter 197 - Comprehensive Land Use Planning I|Section 197.450 - Siting without taking goal exception.

In accordance with the provisions of ORS 30.947, 197.435 to 197.467, 215.213, 215.283 and 215.284, a comprehensive plan may provide for the siting of a destination resort on rural lands without taking an exception to statewide planning goals relating to agricultural lands, forestlands, public facilities and services or urbanization. [1987 c.886 §5]
OR Rev Stat § 197.455 (2021)
2021 Oregon Revised Statutes|Volume : 05 - State Government, Government Procedures, Land Use|Chapter 197 - Comprehensive Land Use Planning I|Section 197.455 - Siting of destination resorts; sites from which destination resort excluded.

(1) A destination resort may be sited only on lands mapped as eligible for destination resort siting by the affected county. The county may not allow destination resorts approved pursuant to ORS 197.435 to 197.467 to be sited in any of the following areas: (a) Within 24 air miles of an urban growth boundary with an existing population of 100,000 or more unless residential uses are limited to those necessary for the staff and management of the resort. (b)(A) On a site with 50 or more contiguous acres of unique or prime farmland identified and mapped by the United States Natural Resources Conservation Service, or its predecessor agency. (B) On a site within three miles of a high value crop area unless the resort complies with the requirements of ORS 197.445 (6) in which case the resort may not be closer to a high value crop area than one-half mile for each 25 units of overnight lodging or fraction thereof. (c) On predominantly Cubic Foot Site Class 1 or 2 forestlands as determined by the State Forestry Department, which are not subject to an approved goal exception. (d) In the Columbia River Gorge National Scenic Area as defined by the Columbia River Gorge National Scenic Act, P.L. 99-663. (e) In an especially sensitive big game habitat area: (A) As determined by the State Department of Fish and Wildlife in July 1984, and in additional especially sensitive big game habitat areas designated by a county in an acknowledged comprehensive plan; or (B) If the State Fish and Wildlife Commission amends the 1984 determination with respect to an entire county and the county amends its comprehensive plan to reflect the commission’s subsequent determination, as designated in the acknowledged comprehensive plan. (f) On a site in which the lands are predominantly classified as being in Fire Regime Condition Class 3, unless the county approves a wildfire protection plan that demonstrates the site can be developed without being at a high overall risk of fire. (2) In carrying out subsection (1) of this section, a county shall adopt, as part of its comprehensive plan, a map consisting of eligible lands within the county. The map must be based on reasonably available information and may be amended pursuant to ORS 197.610 to 197.625, but not more frequently than once every 30 months. The county shall develop a process for collecting and processing concurrently all map amendments made within a 30-month planning period. A map adopted pursuant to this section shall be the sole basis for determining whether tracts of land are eligible for destination resort siting pursuant to ORS 197.435 to 197.467. [1987 c.886 §6; 1993 c.590 §3; 1997 c.249 §57; 2003 c.812 §3; 2005 c.22 §142; 2005 c.205 §1; 2010 c.32 §1]
OR Rev Stat § 197.460 (2021)
2021 Oregon Revised Statutes|Volume : 05 - State Government, Government Procedures, Land Use|Chapter 197 - Comprehensive Land Use Planning I|Section 197.460 - Compatibility with adjacent land uses; county measures; economic impact analysis; traffic impact analysis.

A county shall ensure that a destination resort is compatible with the site and adjacent land uses through the following measures: (1) Important natural features, including habitat of threatened or endangered species, streams, rivers and significant wetlands shall be retained. Riparian vegetation within 100 feet of streams, rivers and significant wetlands shall be retained. Alteration of important natural features, including placement of structures that maintain the overall values of the feature may be allowed. (2) Improvements and activities shall be located and designed to avoid or minimize adverse effects of the resort on uses on surrounding lands, particularly effects on intensive farming operations in the area. At a minimum, measures to accomplish this shall include: (a) Establishment and maintenance of buffers between the resort and adjacent land uses, including natural vegetation and where appropriate, fences, berms, landscaped areas and other similar types of buffers. (b) Setbacks of structures and other improvements from adjacent land uses. (3) If the site is west of the summit of the Coast Range and within 10 miles of an urban growth boundary, or if the site is east of the summit of the Coast Range and within 25 miles of an urban growth boundary, the county shall require the applicant to submit an economic impact analysis of the proposed development that includes analysis of the projected impacts within the county and within cities whose urban growth boundaries are within the distance specified in this subsection. (4) If the site is west of the summit of the Coast Range and within 10 miles of an urban growth boundary, or if the site is east of the summit of the Coast Range and within 25 miles of an urban growth boundary, the county shall require the applicant to submit a traffic impact analysis of the proposed development that includes measures to avoid or mitigate a proportionate share of adverse effects of transportation on state highways and other transportation facilities affected by the proposed development, including transportation facilities in the county and in cities whose urban growth boundaries are within the distance specified in this subsection. [1987 c.886 §7; 2010 c.32 §2]
OR Rev Stat § 197.462 (2021)
2021 Oregon Revised Statutes|Volume : 05 - State Government, Government Procedures, Land Use|Chapter 197 - Comprehensive Land Use Planning I|Section 197.462 - Use of land excluded from destination resort.

A portion of a tract that is excluded from the site of a destination resort pursuant to ORS 197.435 (7) shall not be used or operated in conjunction with the resort. Subject to this limitation, the use of the excluded property shall be governed by otherwise applicable law. [1993 c.590 §7]
OR Rev Stat § 197.465 (2021)
2021 Oregon Revised Statutes|Volume : 05 - State Government, Government Procedures, Land Use|Chapter 197 - Comprehensive Land Use Planning I|Section 197.465 - Comprehensive plan implementing measures.

An acknowledged comprehensive plan that allows for siting of a destination resort shall include implementing measures which: (1) Map areas where a destination resort described in ORS 197.445 (1) to (5) is permitted pursuant to ORS 197.455; (2) Limit uses and activities to those defined by ORS 197.435 and allowed by ORS 197.445; and (3) Assure that developed recreational facilities and key facilities intended to serve the entire development and visitor-oriented accommodations are physically provided or are guaranteed through surety bonding or substantially equivalent financial assurances prior to closure of sale of individual lots or units. In phased developments, developed recreational facilities and other key facilities intended to serve a particular phase shall be constructed prior to sales in that phase or guaranteed through surety bonding. [1987 c.886 §8]
OR Rev Stat § 197.467 (2021)
2021 Oregon Revised Statutes|Volume : 05 - State Government, Government Procedures, Land Use|Chapter 197 - Comprehensive Land Use Planning I|Section 197.467 - Conservation easement to protect resource site.

(1) If a tract to be used as a destination resort contains a resource site designated for protection in an acknowledged comprehensive plan pursuant to open spaces, scenic and historic areas and natural resource goals in an acknowledged comprehensive plan, that tract of land shall preserve that site by conservation easement sufficient to protect the resource values of the resource site as set forth in ORS 271.715 to 271.795. (2) A conservation easement under this section shall be recorded with the property records of the tract on which the destination resort is sited. [1993 c.590 §5]
OR Rev Stat § 197.475 (2021)
2021 Oregon Revised Statutes|Volume : 05 - State Government, Government Procedures, Land Use|Chapter 197 - Comprehensive Land Use Planning I|Section 197.475 - Policy.

The Legislative Assembly declares that it is the policy of this state to provide for mobile home or manufactured dwelling parks within all urban growth boundaries to allow persons and families a choice of residential settings. [1987 c.785 §3; 1989 c.648 §53]
OR Rev Stat § 197.480 (2021)
2021 Oregon Revised Statutes|Volume : 05 - State Government, Government Procedures, Land Use|Chapter 197 - Comprehensive Land Use Planning I|Section 197.480 - Planning for parks; procedures; inventory.

(1) Each city and county governing body shall provide, in accordance with urban growth management agreements, for mobile home or manufactured dwelling parks as an allowed use, by July 1, 1990, or by the next periodic review after January 1, 1988, whichever comes first: (a) By zoning ordinance and by comprehensive plan designation on buildable lands within urban growth boundaries; and (b) In areas planned and zoned for a residential density of six to 12 units per acre sufficient to accommodate the need established pursuant to subsections (2) and (3) of this section. (2) A city or county shall establish a projection of need for mobile home or manufactured dwelling parks based on: (a) Population projections; (b) Household income levels; (c) Housing market trends of the region; and (d) An inventory of mobile home or manufactured dwelling parks sited in areas planned and zoned or generally used for commercial, industrial or high density residential development. (3) The inventory required by subsection (2)(d) and subsection (4) of this section shall establish the need for areas to be planned and zoned to accommodate the potential displacement of the inventoried mobile home or manufactured dwelling parks. (4) Notwithstanding the provisions of subsection (1) of this section, a city or county within a metropolitan service district, established pursuant to ORS chapter 268, shall inventory the mobile home or manufactured dwelling parks sited in areas planned and zoned or generally used for commercial, industrial or high density residential development no later than two years from September 27, 1987. (5)(a) A city or county may establish clear and objective criteria and standards for the placement and design of mobile home or manufactured dwelling parks. (b) If a city or county requires a hearing before approval of a mobile home or manufactured dwelling park, application of the criteria and standards adopted pursuant to paragraph (a) of this subsection shall be the sole issue to be determined at the hearing. (c) No criteria or standards established under paragraph (a) of this subsection shall be adopted which would preclude the development of mobile home or manufactured dwelling parks within the intent of ORS 197.286 and 197.475 to 197.490. [1987 c.785 §4; 1989 c.648 §54]
OR Rev Stat § 197.485 (2021)
2021 Oregon Revised Statutes|Volume : 05 - State Government, Government Procedures, Land Use|Chapter 197 - Comprehensive Land Use Planning I|Section 197.485 - Prohibition on restrictions of manufactured dwelling.

(1) A jurisdiction may not prohibit placement of a manufactured dwelling, due solely to its age, in a mobile home or manufactured dwelling park in a zone with a residential density of eight to 12 units per acre. (2) A jurisdiction may not prohibit placement of a manufactured dwelling, due solely to its age, on a buildable lot or parcel located outside urban growth boundaries or on a space in a mobile home or manufactured dwelling park, if the manufactured dwelling is being relocated due to the closure of a mobile home or manufactured dwelling park or a portion of a mobile home or manufactured dwelling park. (3) A jurisdiction may impose reasonable safety and inspection requirements for homes that were not constructed in conformance with the National Manufactured Housing Construction and Safety Standards Act of 1974 (42 U.S.C. 5403). [1987 c.785 §5; 1989 c.648 §55; 2005 c.22 §143; 2005 c.826 §12; 2007 c.906 §10]
OR Rev Stat § 197.488 (2021)
2021 Oregon Revised Statutes|Volume : 05 - State Government, Government Procedures, Land Use|Chapter 197 - Comprehensive Land Use Planning I|Section 197.488 - Replacement of park destroyed by natural disaster.

(1) As used in this section, "natural disaster" includes any disaster resulting in the declaration of a state of emergency under ORS 401.165 or 401.309 for wildfires, floods, tsunamis, earthquakes or similar events, including disasters began by negligent or intentional acts. (2) Notwithstanding ORS 215.130 (5) to (11) or any land use regulation, statewide land use planning goal or Land Conservation and Development Commission rule, a local government: (a) Shall, if the development complies with the local government’s floodplain and other natural hazard land use regulations, approve an application for the development of a manufactured dwelling park: (A) To replace a park destroyed by a natural disaster; or (B) That is in an area rezoned under paragraph (b) of this subsection. (b) May, by approval of the governing body, approve a zoning change for an area within an urban growth boundary near the destroyed park to permit the development of a manufactured dwelling park where the destruction of manufactured dwellings from the natural disaster has contributed to a shortage in housing. (3) A local government may require an applicant to prove that the destroyed park was assessed as a building or structure for purposes of ad valorem taxation for the most recent property tax year ending before the disaster. (4) In reviewing an application under this section, a local government may not require that an applicant prove that the destroyed park was lawful under the existing land use regulations at any time, including when the building, structure or use was established, at the time of interruption or destruction or at the time of the application. (5) The approval of an application for development of a park under this section does not expire. [2021 c.260 §2] Note: Section 5, chapter 260, Oregon Laws 2021, provides: Sec. 5. Sections 2 [197.488] and 4 [446.198] of this 2021 Act apply to manufactured dwelling parks destroyed by natural disasters occurring on or after September 1, 2020. [2021 c.260 §5] Note: 197.488 was added to and made a part of ORS chapter 197 by legislative action but was not added to any smaller series therein. See Preface to Oregon Revised Statutes for further explanation.
OR Rev Stat § 197.490 (2021)
2021 Oregon Revised Statutes|Volume : 05 - State Government, Government Procedures, Land Use|Chapter 197 - Comprehensive Land Use Planning I|Section 197.490 - Restriction on establishment of park.

(1) Except as provided by ORS 446.105, a mobile home or manufactured dwelling park shall not be established on land, within an urban growth boundary, which is planned or zoned for commercial or industrial use. (2) Notwithstanding the provisions of subsection (1) of this section, if no other access is available, access to a mobile home or manufactured dwelling park may be provided through a commercial or industrial zone. [1987 c.785 §6; 1989 c.648 §56]
OR Rev Stat § 197.492 (2021)
2021 Oregon Revised Statutes|Volume : 05 - State Government, Government Procedures, Land Use|Chapter 197 - Comprehensive Land Use Planning I|Section 197.492 - Definitions for ORS 197.492 and 197.493.

As used in this section and ORS 197.493: (1) "Manufactured dwelling park" has the meaning given that term in ORS 446.003. (2) "Mobile home park" and "recreational vehicle" have the meanings given those terms in ORS 446.007. (3) "Recreational vehicle park": (a) Means a place where two or more recreational vehicles are located within 500 feet of one another on a lot, tract or parcel of land under common ownership and having as its primary purpose: (A) The renting of space and related facilities for a charge or fee; or (B) The provision of space for free in connection with securing the patronage of a person. (b) Does not mean: (A) An area designated only for picnicking or overnight camping; or (B) A manufactured dwelling park or mobile home park. [2005 c.619 §11; 2019 c.422 §30] Note: 197.492 and 197.493 were enacted into law by the Legislative Assembly but were not added to or made a part of ORS chapter 197 or any series therein by legislative action. See Preface to Oregon Revised Statutes for further explanation.
OR Rev Stat § 197.493 (2021)
2021 Oregon Revised Statutes|Volume : 05 - State Government, Government Procedures, Land Use|Chapter 197 - Comprehensive Land Use Planning I|Section 197.493 - Placement and occupancy of recreational vehicle.

(1) A state agency or local government may not prohibit the placement or occupancy of a recreational vehicle, or impose any limit on the length of occupancy of a recreational vehicle as a residential dwelling, solely on the grounds that the occupancy is in a recreational vehicle, if the recreational vehicle is: (a)(A) Located in a manufactured dwelling park, mobile home park or recreational vehicle park; (B) Occupied as a residential dwelling; and (C) Lawfully connected to water and electrical supply systems and a sewage disposal system; or (b) Is on a lot or parcel with a manufactured dwelling or single-family dwelling that is uninhabitable due to damages from a natural disasters, including wildfires, earthquakes, flooding or storms, until no later than the date: (A) The dwelling has been repaired or replaced and an occupancy permit has been issued; (B) The local government makes a determination that the owner of the dwelling is unreasonably delaying in completing repairs or replacing the dwelling; or (C) Twenty-four months after the date the dwelling first became uninhabitable. (2) Subsection (1) of this section does not limit the authority of a state agency or local government to impose other special conditions on the placement or occupancy of a recreational vehicle. [2005 c.619 §12; 2021 c.235 §1] Note: See note under 197.492.
OR Rev Stat § 197.505 (2021)
2021 Oregon Revised Statutes|Volume : 05 - State Government, Government Procedures, Land Use|Chapter 197 - Comprehensive Land Use Planning I|Section 197.505 - Definitions for ORS 197.505 to 197.540.

As used in ORS 197.505 to 197.540: (1) "Public facilities" means those public facilities for which a public facilities plan is required under ORS 197.712. (2) "Special district" refers to only those entities as defined in ORS 197.015 (19) that provide services for which public facilities plans are required. [1980 c.2 §2; 1991 c.839 §1; 1993 c.438 §4; 1995 c.463 §1; 1999 c.838 §1; 2005 c.22 §144; 2007 c.354 §29]
OR Rev Stat § 197.510 (2021)
2021 Oregon Revised Statutes|Volume : 05 - State Government, Government Procedures, Land Use|Chapter 197 - Comprehensive Land Use Planning I|Section 197.510 - Legislative findings.

The Legislative Assembly finds and declares that: (1) The declaration of moratoria on construction and land development by cities, counties and special districts may have a negative effect not only on property owners, but also on the housing and economic development policies and goals of other local governments within the state, and therefore, is a matter of statewide concern. (2) Such moratoria, particularly when limited in duration and scope, and adopted pursuant to growth management systems that further the statewide planning goals and local comprehensive plans, may be both necessary and desirable. (3) Clear state standards should be established to ensure that: (a) The need for moratoria is considered and documented; (b) The impact on property owners, housing and economic development is minimized; and (c) Necessary and properly enacted moratoria are not subjected to undue litigation. [1980 c.2 §1; 1991 c.839 §2; 1995 c.463 §2]