reglab/housing_qa huggingface dataset:
725 ILCS 5/108A-6
2021 Illinois Compiled Statutes|Chapter 725 - CRIMINAL PROCEDURE|725 ILCS 5/ - Code of Criminal Procedure of 1963.|Title II - Apprehension And Investigation

 (from Ch. 38, par. 108A-6)Sec. 108A-6.     Emergency Exception to Procedures.     (a) Notwithstanding any other provisions of this Article,  any investigative or law enforcement officer, upon approval of  a State's Attorney, or without it if a reasonable effort has  been made to contact the appropriate State's Attorney, may use  an eavesdropping device in an emergency situation as defined  in this Section.  Such use must be in accordance with the  provisions of this Section and may be allowed only where the officer  reasonably believes that an order permitting the use of the  device would issue were there a prior hearing.An emergency situation exists when, without previous  notice to the law enforcement officer sufficient to obtain  prior judicial approval, the conversation to be overheard or  recorded will occur within a short period of time, the use  of the device is necessary for the protection of the law enforcement  officer or it will occur in a situation involving a clear and present  danger of imminent death or great bodily harm to persons resulting from:  (1) a kidnapping or the holding of a hostage by force or the threat of the  imminent use of force; or (2) the occupation by force or the threat of the  imminent use of force of any premises, place, vehicle, vessel or aircraft; or  (3) any violation of Article 29D.(b) In all such cases, an application for an order approving  the previous or continuing use of an eavesdropping  device must be made within 48 hours of the commencement of  such use.  In the absence of such an order, or upon its denial,  any continuing use shall immediately terminate.In order to approve such emergency use, the judge must  make a determination (1) that he would have granted an order  had the information been before the court prior to the use of  the device and (2) that there was an emergency situation as  defined in this Section.(c) In the event that an application for approval under this Section is  denied the contents of the conversations overheard or recorded shall be  treated as having been obtained in violation of this Article.    (Source: P.A. 92-854, eff. 12-5-02.)
725 ILCS 5/108A-7
2021 Illinois Compiled Statutes|Chapter 725 - CRIMINAL PROCEDURE|725 ILCS 5/ - Code of Criminal Procedure of 1963.|Title II - Apprehension And Investigation

 (from Ch. 38, par. 108A-7)Sec. 108A-7.     Retention and Review of Recordings.(a) The contents of any conversation overheard by any  eavesdropping device shall, if possible, be recorded on tape  or a comparable device.  The recording of the contents of a  conversation under this Article shall be done in such a way  as will protect the recording from editing or other alterations.(b) Immediately after the expiration of the period of  the order or extension or, where the recording was made in an  emergency situation as defined in Section 108A-6, at the time of  the request for approval subsequent to the emergency, all such  recordings shall be made available to the judge issuing the  order or hearing the application for approval of an emergency application.The judge shall listen to the tapes, determine if the conversations  thereon are within his order or were appropriately  made in emergency situations, and make a record of such determination  to be retained with the tapes.The recordings shall be sealed under the instructions of  the judge and custody shall be where he orders.  Such recordings  shall not be destroyed except upon order of the judge hearing  the application and in any event shall be kept for 10 years  if not destroyed upon his order.Duplicate recordings may be made for any use or disclosure  authorized by this Article.  The presence of the seal  provided for in this Section or a satisfactory explanation for the  absence thereof shall be a pre-requisite for the use or  disclosure of the contents of the recordings or any evidence derived therefrom.(c) Applications made and orders granted under this  Article shall be sealed by the judge.  Custody of the applications  and orders shall be wherever the judge requests.  Such applications and orders shall be disclosed only upon a  showing of good cause before a judge.  Such documents shall  not be destroyed except on the order of the issuing or  denying judge or after the expiration of 10 years time if  not destroyed upon his order.    (Source: P.A. 79-1159.)
725 ILCS 5/108A-8
2021 Illinois Compiled Statutes|Chapter 725 - CRIMINAL PROCEDURE|725 ILCS 5/ - Code of Criminal Procedure of 1963.|Title II - Apprehension And Investigation

 (from Ch. 38, par. 108A-8)Sec. 108A-8.     Notice to Parties Overheard.(a) Within a reasonable time, but not later than 90 days  after either the filing of an application for an order of  authorization or approval which is denied or not later than 90 days after the  termination of the period of an order or extension thereof,  the issuing or denying judge shall cause to be served on  the persons named in the order or application and such other  persons in the recorded conversation as the judge may determine  that justice requires be notified, a notice of the transaction  involving any requested or completed use of an eavesdropping  device which shall include:(1) notice of the entry of an order, of subsequent  approval in an emergency situation, or the denial  of an application;(2) the date of the entry, approval, or denial;(3) the period of the authorized use of any eavesdropping  device; and(4) notice of whether during the period of eavesdropping  devices were or were not used to overhear and  record various conversations and whether or not  such conversations are recorded.On an ex parte showing of good cause, the notice required  by this subsection may be postponed.(b) Upon the filing of a motion, the judge may in his  discretion make available to such person or his attorney for  inspection such portions of the recorded conversations or the  applications and orders as the judge determines it would be  in the interest of justice to make available.(c) The contents of any recorded conversation or  evidence derived therefrom shall not be received in evidence  or otherwise disclosed in any trial, hearing, or other judicial  or administrative proceeding unless each party not less than  10 days before such a proceeding has been furnished with a  copy of the court order and accompanying application under  which the recording was authorized or approved and has had an  opportunity to examine the portion of the tapes to be introduced  or relied upon.  Such 10 day period may be waived by  the judge if he finds that it was not possible to furnish the  party with such information within the stated period and that  the party will not be materially prejudiced by the delay in  receiving such information.    (Source: P.A. 79-1159.)
725 ILCS 5/108A-9
2021 Illinois Compiled Statutes|Chapter 725 - CRIMINAL PROCEDURE|725 ILCS 5/ - Code of Criminal Procedure of 1963.|Title II - Apprehension And Investigation

 (from Ch. 38, par. 108A-9)Sec. 108A-9.     Motion to Suppress Contents of Recording, etc.(a) Any aggrieved person in any judicial or administrative  proceeding may move to suppress the contents of any recorded  conversation or evidence derived therefrom on the grounds that:(1) the conversation was unlawfully overheard and recorded;(2) the order of authorization or approval under  which the device was used or a recording made was  improperly granted; or(3) the recording or interception was not made in  conformity with the order of authorization.(b) Such a motion shall be made before the proceeding  unless there was no previous opportunity for such motion.  If  the motion is granted, the contents shall be treated as having  been obtained in violation of this Article.  Upon the filing  of such a motion, the judge may in his discretion make  available to the moving party or his attorney such portions  of the recorded conversation or evidence derived therefrom as  the judge determines to be in the interests of justice.    (Source: P.A. 79-1159.)
725 ILCS 5/108A-10
2021 Illinois Compiled Statutes|Chapter 725 - CRIMINAL PROCEDURE|725 ILCS 5/ - Code of Criminal Procedure of 1963.|Title II - Apprehension And Investigation

 (from Ch. 38, par. 108A-10)Sec. 108A-10.     Appeal by State.     In addition to any other  right to appeal, the State shall have the right to appeal  from a denial of an application for an order of authorization  or approval and the right to appeal the granting of a motion  to suppress.Where the State appeals, such appeal shall be taken within  30 days after the date the order was denied or motion granted  and shall be diligently prosecuted.    (Source: P.A. 79-1159.)
725 ILCS 5/108A-11
2021 Illinois Compiled Statutes|Chapter 725 - CRIMINAL PROCEDURE|725 ILCS 5/ - Code of Criminal Procedure of 1963.|Title II - Apprehension And Investigation

 (from Ch. 38, par. 108A-11)Sec. 108A-11. Reports concerning use of eavesdropping devices.(a) In January of each year the State's Attorney of each county in which  eavesdropping devices were used pursuant to the provisions of this  Article shall report to the Illinois State Police the  following with respect to each application for an order authorizing the  use of an eavesdropping device, or an extension thereof, made during the  preceding calendar year:(1) the fact that such an order, extension, or     subsequent approval of an emergency was applied for;(2) the kind of order or extension applied for;(3) a statement as to whether the order or extension     was granted as applied for was modified, or was denied;(4) the period authorized by the order or extensions     in which an eavesdropping device could be used;(5) the felony specified in the order extension or     denied application;(6) the identity of the applying investigative or law     enforcement officer and agency making the application and the State's Attorney authorizing the application; and(7) the nature of the facilities from which or the     place where the eavesdropping device was to be used.(b) Such report shall also include the following:(1) a general description of the uses of     eavesdropping devices actually made under such order to overheard or record conversations, including:  (a) the approximate nature and frequency of incriminating conversations overheard, (b)  the approximate nature and frequency of other conversations overheard, (c) the approximate number of persons whose conversations were overheard, and (d) the approximate nature, amount, and cost of the manpower and other resources used pursuant to the authorization to use an eavesdropping device;(2) the number of arrests resulting from authorized     uses of eavesdropping devices and the offenses for which arrests were made;(3) the number of trials resulting from such uses of     eavesdropping devices;(4) the number of motions to suppress made with     respect to such uses, and the number granted or denied; and(5) the number of convictions resulting from such     uses and the offenses for which the convictions were obtained and a general assessment of the importance of the convictions.(c) In April of each year, the Illinois State Police  shall transmit to the General Assembly  a report including information on the number of  applications for orders authorizing the use of eavesdropping  devices, the number of orders and extensions granted or denied  during the preceding calendar year, and the convictions arising  out of such uses.The requirement for reporting to the General Assembly shall be satisfied  by filing copies of the report as required by Section 3.1 of the General Assembly Organization Act, and  filing such additional copies with the State Government Report Distribution  Center for the General Assembly as is required under paragraph (t) of  Section 7 of the State Library Act.  (Source: P.A. 102-538, eff. 8-20-21.)
725 ILCS 5/Art. 108B heading
2021 Illinois Compiled Statutes|Chapter 725 - CRIMINAL PROCEDURE|725 ILCS 5/ - Code of Criminal Procedure of 1963.|Title II - Apprehension And Investigation

 ARTICLE 108B.      ELECTRONIC CRIMINAL SURVEILLANCE
725 ILCS 5/108B-1.5
2021 Illinois Compiled Statutes|Chapter 725 - CRIMINAL PROCEDURE|725 ILCS 5/ - Code of Criminal Procedure of 1963.|Title II - Apprehension And Investigation

Sec. 108B-1.5.     Retired law enforcement officer.     Nothing in this  Article authorizes a retired law enforcement officer to display or use a  firearm at any time.    (Source: P.A. 92-863, eff. 1-3-03.)
725 ILCS 5/108B-2
2021 Illinois Compiled Statutes|Chapter 725 - CRIMINAL PROCEDURE|725 ILCS 5/ - Code of Criminal Procedure of 1963.|Title II - Apprehension And Investigation

 (from Ch. 38, par. 108B-2)Sec. 108B-2. Request for application for interception.(a) A State's Attorney may apply for an order  authorizing interception of private communications in  accordance with the provisions of this Article.(b) The head of a law enforcement agency, including, for purposes of  this subsection, the acting head of such law enforcement agency if the head  of such agency is absent or unable to serve, may request that a State's  Attorney apply for an order authorizing  interception of private communications in accordance with  the provisions of this Article.Upon request of a law enforcement agency, the Illinois State Police may provide  technical assistance to such an agency which is authorized to conduct an  interception.  (Source: P.A. 102-538, eff. 8-20-21.)
725 ILCS 5/108B-2a
2021 Illinois Compiled Statutes|Chapter 725 - CRIMINAL PROCEDURE|725 ILCS 5/ - Code of Criminal Procedure of 1963.|Title II - Apprehension And Investigation

 (from Ch. 38, par. 108B-2a)Sec. 108B-2a.     Authorized disclosure or use of information.     (a) Any law  enforcement officer who, by any means authorized in this Article, has  obtained knowledge of the contents of any conversation overheard or  recorded by use of an eavesdropping device or evidence derived therefrom,  may disclose such contents to another law enforcement officer or  prosecuting attorney to the extent that such disclosure is appropriate to  the proper performance of the official duties of the person making or  receiving the disclosure.(b) Any investigative officer, including any attorney authorized by law  to prosecute or participate in the prosecution of offenses enumerated in  Section 108B-3 of this Act or law  enforcement officer who, by any means  authorized in this Article, has obtained knowledge of the contents of any  conversation overheard or recorded by use of an eavesdropping device or  evidence derived therefrom, may use the contents to the extent such use is  appropriate to the proper performance of his official duties.(c) Admissibility into evidence in any judicial, administrative, or  legislative proceeding shall be as elsewhere described in this Article.    (Source: P.A. 85-1203.)
725 ILCS 5/108B-5
2021 Illinois Compiled Statutes|Chapter 725 - CRIMINAL PROCEDURE|725 ILCS 5/ - Code of Criminal Procedure of 1963.|Title II - Apprehension And Investigation

 (from Ch. 38, par. 108B-5)Sec. 108B-5. Requirements for order of interception.(a) Upon consideration of an application, the chief judge may enter an  ex parte order, as requested or as modified, authorizing the interception of  a private communication, if the chief judge determines on the basis of the  application submitted by the applicant, that:(1) There is probable cause for belief that (A) the     person whose private communication is to be intercepted is committing, has committed, or is about to commit an offense enumerated in Section 108B-3, or (B) the facilities from which, or the place where, the private communication is to be intercepted, is, has been, or is about to be used in connection with the commission of the offense, or is leased to, listed in the name of, or commonly used by, the person; and(2) There is probable cause for belief that a     particular private communication concerning such offense may be obtained through the interception; and(3) Normal investigative procedures with respect to     the offense have been tried and have failed or reasonably appear to be unlikely to succeed if tried or too dangerous to employ; and(4) The electronic criminal surveillance officers to     be authorized to supervise the interception of the private communication have been certified by the Illinois State Police.(b) In the case of an application, other than for an extension, for an  order to intercept a communication of a person or on a wire communication  facility that was the subject of a previous order authorizing interception,  the application shall be based upon new evidence or information different from  and in addition to the evidence or information offered to support the prior  order, regardless of whether the evidence was derived from prior interceptions  or from other sources.(c) The chief judge may authorize interception of a private  communication anywhere in the judicial circuit.  If the  court authorizes  the use of an eavesdropping device with respect to a vehicle, watercraft,  or aircraft that is within the judicial circuit at the time the order is  issued, the order may provide that the interception may continue anywhere  within the State if the vehicle, watercraft, or aircraft leaves the  judicial circuit.  (Source: P.A. 102-538, eff. 8-20-21.)
725 ILCS 5/108B-6
2021 Illinois Compiled Statutes|Chapter 725 - CRIMINAL PROCEDURE|725 ILCS 5/ - Code of Criminal Procedure of 1963.|Title II - Apprehension And Investigation

 (from Ch. 38, par. 108B-6)Sec. 108B-6.     Privileged communications.     Nothing in this Article shall  be construed to authorize the interception, disclosure or use of  information obtained from privileged communications.    (Source: P.A. 85-1203.)
725 ILCS 5/108B-8
2021 Illinois Compiled Statutes|Chapter 725 - CRIMINAL PROCEDURE|725 ILCS 5/ - Code of Criminal Procedure of 1963.|Title II - Apprehension And Investigation

 (from Ch. 38, par. 108B-8)Sec. 108B-8. Emergency use of eavesdropping device.(a) Whenever,  upon informal application by the State's Attorney,  a chief judge of competent jurisdiction determines that:(1) there may be grounds upon which an order could be     issued under this Article;(2) there is probable cause to believe that an     emergency situation exists with respect to the investigation of an offense enumerated in Section 108B-3; and(3) there is probable cause to believe that a     substantial danger to life or limb exists justifying the authorization for immediate interception of a private communication before formal application for an order could with due diligence be submitted to him and acted upon; the chief judge may grant oral approval for an interception, without an order, conditioned upon the filing with him, within 48 hours, of an application for an order under Section 108B-4 which shall also recite the oral approval under this Section and be retroactive to the time of the oral approval.(b) Interception under oral approval under this Section shall immediately  terminate when the communication sought is obtained or when the application  for an order is denied, whichever is earlier.(c) In the event no formal application for an order is subsequently made  under this Section,  the content of any private communication  intercepted under oral approval  under this Section shall be treated as having been obtained in violation  of this Article.(d) In the event no application for an order is made under this Section  or an application made under this Section is subsequently denied, the judge  shall cause an  inventory to be served under Section 108B-11 of this Article and shall require  the tape or other recording of the intercepted communication to be delivered  to, and sealed by, the judge.  The evidence shall be retained by the court,  and it shall not be used or disclosed in any legal proceeding, except a  civil action brought by an aggrieved person under Section 14-6 of the Criminal  Code of 1961 or the Criminal Code of 2012, or as otherwise authorized by the order of a court of competent  jurisdiction.  In addition to other remedies or penalties provided by law,  failure to deliver any tape or other recording to the chief judge shall be  punishable  as contempt by the judge directing the delivery.  (Source: P.A. 97-1150, eff. 1-25-13.)
725 ILCS 5/108B-9
2021 Illinois Compiled Statutes|Chapter 725 - CRIMINAL PROCEDURE|725 ILCS 5/ - Code of Criminal Procedure of 1963.|Title II - Apprehension And Investigation

 (from Ch. 38, par. 108B-9)Sec. 108B-9.     Recordings, records and custody.(a) Any private  communication intercepted in accordance with this Article shall, if  practicable, be recorded by tape or other comparable method.  The recording  shall, if practicable, be done in such a way as will protect it from  editing or other alteration.  During an interception, the interception  shall be carried out by an electronic criminal surveillance officer, and,  if practicable, such officer shall keep a signed, written record, including:(1) the date and hours of surveillance;(2) the time and duration of each intercepted     communication;(3) the parties, if known, to each intercepted     conversation; and(4) a summary of the contents of each intercepted     communication.(b) Immediately upon the expiration of the order or its extensions, the  tapes and other recordings shall be transferred to the chief judge issuing the  order and sealed under his direction.  Custody of the tapes, or other  recordings, shall be maintained wherever the chief judge directs.  They  shall not be destroyed except upon an order of a court of competent  jurisdiction and in any event shall be kept for 10 years.  Duplicate tapes  or other recordings may be made for disclosure or use under paragraph (a)  of Section 108B-2a of this Article.  The presence of the seal provided by  this Section, or a satisfactory explanation for its absence, shall be a  prerequisite for the disclosure of the contents of any private  communication, or evidence derived from it, under  paragraph (b) of Section 108B-2a of this Article.    (Source: P.A. 92-854, eff. 12-5-02.)
725 ILCS 5/108B-10
2021 Illinois Compiled Statutes|Chapter 725 - CRIMINAL PROCEDURE|725 ILCS 5/ - Code of Criminal Procedure of 1963.|Title II - Apprehension And Investigation

 (from Ch. 38, par. 108B-10)Sec. 108B-10.     Applications, orders, and custody.(a) Applications made  and orders granted under this Article for the interception of private  communications shall be sealed by the chief judge issuing or denying them and  held in custody as the judge shall direct.  The applications and orders  shall be kept for a period of 10 years.  Destruction of the applications  and orders prior to the expiration of that period of time may be made only  upon the order of  a court of competent jurisdiction.  Disclosure of the applications and orders  may be ordered by a court of competent jurisdiction on a showing  of good  cause.(b) The electronic criminal surveillance officer shall retain a copy of  applications  and orders for the interception of private  communications.  The applications  and orders shall be kept for a period of 10 years.  Destruction of the  applications  and orders prior to the expiration of that period of time may be made only  upon an order of a  court of competent jurisdiction.  Disclosure and use of the applications  and orders may be made by an electronic criminal surveillance officer only  in the proper performance of his official duties.(c) In addition to any other remedies or penalties provided by law,  any violation of this Section shall be punishable as contempt of court.    (Source: P.A. 92-854, eff. 12-5-02.)