CT Gen Stat § 38a-134. (Formerly Sec. 38-39f) (2020)
2020 Connecticut General Statutes|Title 38a - Insurance|Chapter 698 - Insurers|Section 38a-134. (Formerly Sec. 38-39f) - Nonvotable securities. Injunctive relief.

 (a) No security which is the subject of any agreement or arrangement regarding acquisition or which is acquired or to be acquired in contravention of the provisions of sections 38a-129 to 38a-140, inclusive, or of any regulation or order promulgated by the commissioner hereunder may be voted at any securityholders' meeting or may be counted for quorum purposes, and any action of securityholders requiring the affirmative vote of a specified percentage of shares may be taken as though such securities were not issued and outstanding; but, in the event the status of any such securities is not challenged by the issuer or any stockholder at a meeting, such securities may be voted and counted for quorum purposes at the meeting and the voting of such securities shall not invalidate the action taken at any such meeting.(b) The insurance company or the commissioner may apply to the superior court for the judicial district of Hartford or to the superior court for the judicial district in which the insurance company has its principal place of business, or to any judge thereof, for equitable relief to enjoin any offer, request, invitation, agreement or acquisition made in contravention of the provisions of sections 38a-129 to 38a-140, inclusive, or any regulation or order promulgated by the commissioner hereunder or the voting of any security so acquired. In any case where a person has acquired or is proposing to acquire any securities in violation of said sections or any regulation or order promulgated by the commissioner hereunder, the superior court for the judicial district of Hartford or the superior court for the judicial district in which the insurance company has its principal place of business may, on such notice as the court deems appropriate, upon the application of the insurance company or the commissioner, seize or sequester any securities of the insurance company owned directly or indirectly by such person with such orders with respect thereto as the court deems appropriate to effectuate the provisions of said sections. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, for the purposes of said sections the situs of the ownership of all securities of all domestic insurance companies shall be construed to be this state.(1969, P.A. 444, S. 6; P.A. 78-280, S. 2, 6, 127; P.A. 88-230, S. 1, 12; P.A. 90-98, S. 1, 2; P.A. 92-112, S. 17, 35; P.A. 93-142, S. 4, 7, 8; P.A. 95-220, S. 4–6.)History: P.A. 78-280 replaced “Hartford county” with “judicial district of Hartford-New Britain” and “county” with “judicial district” in Subsec. (b); P.A. 88-230 replaced “judicial district of Hartford-New Britain” with “judicial district of Hartford”, effective September 1, 1991; P.A. 90-98 changed the effective date of P.A. 88-230 from September 1, 1991, to September 1, 1993; Sec. 38-39f transferred to Sec. 38a-134 in 1991; P.A. 92-112 amended Subsec. (a) to make technical corrections for statutory consistency and replaced references to “stockholders” with “securityholders”; P.A. 93-142 changed the effective date of P.A. 88-230 from September 1, 1993, to September 1, 1996, effective June 14, 1993; P.A. 95-220 changed the effective date of P.A. 88-230 from September 1, 1996, to September 1, 1998, effective July 1, 1995.Annotation to former section 38-39f:Cited. 184 C. 352.