CT Gen Stat § 26-235 (2020)
2020 Connecticut General Statutes|Title 26 - Fisheries and Game|Chapter 491 - State Shellfisheries|Section 26-235 - Taking of clams. Recreational harvest limit. Penalties. Defacing or removal of sign.

 (a) No person shall take any long clams less than one and one-half inches in length, provided the Waterford-East Lyme shellfish commission may make such residency requirements for digging or taking clams from the shores or waters of the Niantic River as it deems reasonable and in the best public interest of the Waterford-East Lyme area. Unless otherwise provided by statute, regulation or local ordinance, the recreational harvest limit of clams shall not exceed one-half bushel per person daily. The Commissioner of Agriculture may designate by regulations adopted in accordance with the provisions of chapter 54 shores and waters for the exclusive recreational harvesting of clams. For the purposes of this section, recreational harvest of clams means the collection of clams by an individual for personal consumption or consumption by such individual's family.(b) The common council of any consolidated town and city and the selectmen of any other town may determine the quantity of clams to be taken therein by a person during one day and may prohibit, for a period not exceeding one year, the taking of clams from any waters or beaches they may designate within the territorial limits of such town, if they deem such prohibition necessary for the protection of the natural clam areas, by posting notices on such designated territorial limits stating that the taking of clams within such areas is prohibited.(c) Any person who violates any provision of subsection (a) or (b) of this section shall have committed an infraction.(d) Any person who takes clams from an area closed and posted against the taking of clams by the Department of Agriculture or from an area closed by license issuance or by order of a local health department shall be fined not less than seventy-five dollars or more than one thousand dollars or three times the market value of any clams taken, based on the quantity and type involved in the violation, if such amount is greater than one thousand dollars, or imprisoned not more than one year.(e) Any person who defaces or removes a sign posted by the Department of Agriculture, in accordance with the provisions of section 26-192e, shall be fined not more than five hundred dollars or imprisoned not more than six months.(1949 Rev., S. 5067; 1953, S. 2561d; 1959, P.A. 169, S. 1; P.A. 83-245, S. 2; P.A. 86-8; P.A. 99-169, S. 3, 7; June 30 Sp. Sess. P.A. 03-6, S. 146(e); P.A. 04-189, S. 1; 04-223, S. 7; P.A. 05-288, S. 121; P.A. 12-80, S. 177.)History: 1959 act authorized Waterford-East Lyme shellfish commission to make residency requirements re digging or taking clams from shores or waters of Niantic River; P.A. 83-245 amended Subsec. (a) to define recreational harvest limit and to establish a limit of one bushel per person and amended Subsec. (c) to replace $100 fine with provision making violations an infraction; P.A. 86-8 amended Subsec. (a) by reducing the recreational harvest limit for clams from one to one-half bushel per person daily; P.A. 99-169 deleted a provision in Subsec. (a) limiting authorization under this section to residents of this state, effective June 23, 1999; June 30 Sp. Sess. P.A. 03-6 replaced Commissioner of Agriculture with Commissioner of Agriculture and Consumer Protection, effective July 1, 2004; P.A. 04-189 repealed Sec. 146 of June 30 Sp. Sess. P.A. 03-6, thereby reversing the merger of the Departments of Agriculture and Consumer Protection, effective June 1, 2004; P.A. 04-223 made technical changes in Subsecs. (a) and (c) and added Subsecs. (d) re penalties for prohibited taking of clams and (e) re penalty for defacing or removal of sign posted by Department of Agriculture, effective July 1, 2004; P.A. 05-288 made a technical change in Subsec. (d), effective July 13, 2005; P.A. 12-80 amended Subsec. (d) to replace maximum term of imprisonment of “twelve months” with “one year”.Cited. 231 C. 418.