reglab/housing_qa huggingface dataset:
22 OK Stat § 22-898 (2021)
2021 Oklahoma Statutes|Title 22. Criminal Procedure|§22-898. Court during jury's retirement - Sealed verdicts - Final adjournment for term discharges jury.

|While the jury are absent the court may adjourn from time to time as to other business, but it is nevertheless deemed open for any purpose connected with the cause submitted to them until verdict is rendered or the jury discharged. If the jury agree on a verdict during a temporary adjournment or recess of the court, they may, upon the direction of the court, sign the verdict by their foreman, securely seal the same in an envelope, and deliver the same to the foreman, when they may separate until the next convening of the court, at which time they shall reassemble in the jury room and return their verdict in open court, when the same proceedings shall be had as in case of other verdicts. A final adjournment of the court for the term discharges the jury. |R.L.1910, § 5917.
22 OK Stat § 22-911 (2021)
2021 Oklahoma Statutes|Title 22. Criminal Procedure|§22-911. Return of jury into court upon agreement - Discharge on failure of some jurors to appear.

|When the jury have agreed upon their verdict, they may be conducted into court by the officer having them in charge. Their names must then be called, and if all do not appear, the rest must be discharged without giving a verdict. In that case the cause must be again tried, at the same or another term. |R.L.1910, § 5918.
22 OK Stat § 22-912 (2021)
2021 Oklahoma Statutes|Title 22. Criminal Procedure|§22-912. Presence of defendant required in felony cases when verdict received - Discretionary in misdemeanor cases.

|If the indictment or information is for a felony, the defendant must, before the verdict is received, appear in person. If it is for a misdemeanor, the verdict may, in the discretion of the court, be rendered in his absence. |R.L.1910, § 5919.
22 OK Stat § 22-913 (2021)
2021 Oklahoma Statutes|Title 22. Criminal Procedure|§22-913. Proceedings when jury appear.

|When the jury appear, they must be asked, by the court or the clerk, whether they have agreed upon their verdict, and if the foreman answers in the affirmative, they must, on being required, declare the same. |R.L.1910, § 5920.
22 OK Stat § 22-914 (2021)
2021 Oklahoma Statutes|Title 22. Criminal Procedure|§22-914. Form of verdict.

|A general verdict upon a plea of not guilty, is either "guilty", or "not guilty", which imports a conviction or acquittal of the offense charged. Upon a plea of a former conviction or acquittal of the same offense, it is either "for the state", or "for the defendant". When the defendant is acquitted on the ground that he was insane at the time of the commission of the act charged, the verdict must be "not guilty by reason of insanity". When the defendant is acquitted on the ground of variance between the charge and the proof, the verdict must be "not guilty by reason of variance between charge and proof". |R.L.1910, § 5921.
22 OK Stat § 22-915 (2021)
2021 Oklahoma Statutes|Title 22. Criminal Procedure|§22-915. Degree of crime must be found.

|Whenever a crime is distinguished into degrees, the jury, if they convict the defendant, must find the degree of the crime of which he is guilty. |R.L.1910, § 5922.
22 OK Stat § 22-916 (2021)
2021 Oklahoma Statutes|Title 22. Criminal Procedure|§22-916. Included offense or attempt may be found.

|The jury may find the defendant guilty of any offense, the commission of which is necessarily included in that with which he is charged, or of an attempt to commit the offense. |R.L.1910, § 5923.
22 OK Stat § 22-917 (2021)
2021 Oklahoma Statutes|Title 22. Criminal Procedure|§22-917. Several defendants - Verdict as to part - Retrial as to defendants not agreed on.

|On an indictment or information against several, if the jury cannot agree upon a verdict as to all, they may render a verdict as to those in regard to whom they do agree, on which a judgment must be entered accordingly, and the case as to the rest may be tried by another jury. |R.L.1910, § 5924.
22 OK Stat § 22-918 (2021)
2021 Oklahoma Statutes|Title 22. Criminal Procedure|§22-918. Jury may reconsider verdict of conviction for mistake of law - Return of same verdict.

|When there is a verdict of conviction in which it appears to the court that the jury have mistaken the law, the court may explain the reason for that opinion, and direct the jury to reconsider their verdict, and if, after the reconsideration, they return the same verdict, it must be entered. But when there is a verdict of acquittal, the court cannot require the jury to reconsider it. |R.L.1910, § 5925.
22 OK Stat § 22-919 (2021)
2021 Oklahoma Statutes|Title 22. Criminal Procedure|§22-919. Informal verdict to be reconsidered.

|If the jury render a verdict not in form, the court may, with proper instructions as to the law, direct them to reconsider it, and it cannot be recorded until it be rendered in some form from which it can be clearly understood what is the intent of the jury. |R.L.1910, § 5926.
22 OK Stat § 22-920 (2021)
2021 Oklahoma Statutes|Title 22. Criminal Procedure|§22-920. Judgment when jury persist in informal verdict.

|If the jury persist in finding an informal verdict, from which, however, it can be clearly understood that their intention is to find in favor of the defendant upon the issue, it must be entered in the terms in which it is found, and the court must give judgment of acquittal. But no judgment of conviction can be given unless the jury expressly find against the defendant, upon the issue, or judgment be given against him on a special verdict. |R.L.1910, § 5927.
22 OK Stat § 22-921 (2021)
2021 Oklahoma Statutes|Title 22. Criminal Procedure|§22-921. Polling jury.

|When a verdict is rendered, and before it is recorded, the jury may be polled on the requirement of either party, in which case they must be severally asked whether it is their verdict, and if any one answer in the negative, the jury must be sent out for further deliberation. |R.L.1910, § 5928.
22 OK Stat § 22-922 (2021)
2021 Oklahoma Statutes|Title 22. Criminal Procedure|§22-922. Recording and reading verdict - Disagreement of jurors entered upon minutes - Discharge if no disagreement.

|When the verdict is given, and is such as the court may receive, the clerk must immediately record it in full upon the minutes, and the judge or the clerk must read it to the jury and inquire of them whether it is their verdict. If any juror disagree, the fact must be entered upon the minutes, and the jury again sent out; but if no disagreement is expressed, the verdict is complete, and the jury must be discharged from the case. |Amended by Laws 1985, c. 119, § 1, eff. Nov. 1, 1985.
22 OK Stat § 22-923 (2021)
2021 Oklahoma Statutes|Title 22. Criminal Procedure|§22-923. Defendant discharged on acquittal - Variance resulting in acquittal may authorize new charges.

|If a judgment of acquittal is given on a general verdict, and the defendant is not detained for any other legal cause, he must be discharged as soon as judgment is given, except that when the acquittal is for a variance between the proof and the indictment or information which may be obviated by a new indictment or information the court may order his detention to the end that a new indictment or information may be preferred in the same manner and with like effect as provided in cases where the jury is discharged. |R.L.1910, § 5930.
22 OK Stat § 22-924 (2021)
2021 Oklahoma Statutes|Title 22. Criminal Procedure|§22-924. Commitment upon conviction.

|If a general verdict is rendered against the defendant he must be remanded if in custody, or if on bail he may be committed to the proper officer of the county to await the judgment of the court upon the verdict. When committed his bail is exonerated, or if money is deposited instead of bail it must be refunded to the defendant. |R.L.1910, § 5931.
22 OK Stat § 22-925 (2021)
2021 Oklahoma Statutes|Title 22. Criminal Procedure|§22-925. Claim of insanity - Duty of court and jury - Commitment to institution.

|When it is contended on behalf of the defendant in any criminal prosecution that such defendant is at the time of the trial a person who is impaired by reason of mental retardation, a mentally ill person, an insane person, or a person of unsound mind, the court shall submit to the jury a proper form of verdict, and if the jury finds the defendant not guilty on account of such insanity, mental illness, or unsoundness of mind, they shall so state in their verdict, and the court shall thereupon order the defendant committed to the state hospital for the mentally ill, or other state institution provided for the care and treatment of cases such as the one before the court, until the sanity and soundness of mind of the defendant be judicially determined, and such person be discharged from the institution according to law. |R.L. 1910, § 5932. Amended by Laws 1998, c. 246, § 14, eff. Nov. 1, 1998.
22 OK Stat § 22-926.1 (2021)
2021 Oklahoma Statutes|Title 22. Criminal Procedure|§22-926.1. Assessment of punishment by jury.

|In all cases of a verdict of conviction for any offense against any of the laws of the State of Oklahoma, the jury may, and shall upon the request of the defendant assess and declare the punishment in their verdict within the limitations fixed by law, and the court shall render a judgment according to such verdict, except as hereinafter provided. |Added by Laws 1999, 1st Ex.Sess., c. 5, § 439, eff. July 1, 1999.
22 OK Stat § 22-927.1 (2021)
2021 Oklahoma Statutes|Title 22. Criminal Procedure|§22-927.1. Punishment assessed by court.

|Where the jury finds a verdict of guilty, and fails to agree on the punishment to be inflicted, or does not declare such punishment by their verdict, the court shall assess and declare the punishment and render the judgment accordingly. |Added by Laws 1999, 1st Ex.Sess., c. 5, § 440, eff. July 1, 1999.
22 OK Stat § 22-928.1 (2021)
2021 Oklahoma Statutes|Title 22. Criminal Procedure|§22-928.1. Excess punishment to be disregarded by court.

|If the jury assesses a punishment, whether of imprisonment or fine, greater than the highest limit declared by law for the offense of which they convict the defendant, the court shall disregard the excess and pronounce sentence and render judgment according to the highest limit prescribed by law in the particular case. |Added by Laws 1999, 1st Ex.Sess., c. 5, § 441, eff. July 1, 1999.
22 OK Stat § 22-929 (2021)
2021 Oklahoma Statutes|Title 22. Criminal Procedure|§22-929. Remand for vacation of sentence - New sentencing proceeding - Construction of section.

|A. Upon any appeal of a conviction by the defendant in a noncapital criminal case, the appellate court, if it finds prejudicial error in the sentencing proceeding only, may set aside the sentence rendered and remand the case to the trial court in the jurisdiction in which the defendant was originally sentenced for resentencing. No error in the sentencing proceeding shall result in the reversal of the conviction in a criminal case unless the error directly affected the determination of guilt. |B. When a criminal case is remanded for vacation of a sentence, the court may:1. Set the case for a nonjury sentencing proceeding; or2. If the defendant or the prosecutor so requests in writing, impanel a new sentencing jury.C. If a written request for a jury trial is filed within twenty (20) days of the date of the appellate court order, the trial court shall impanel a new jury for the purpose of conducting a new sentencing proceeding.1. All exhibits and a transcript of all testimony and other evidence properly admitted in the prior trial and sentencing shall be admissible in the new sentencing proceeding. Additional relevant evidence may be admitted including testimony of witnesses who testified at the previous trial.2. The provisions of this section are procedural and shall apply retroactively to any defendant sentenced in this state.D. This section shall not be construed to amend or be in conflict with the provisions of Section 701.10 or 701.10a of Title 21 of the Oklahoma Statutes relating to sentencing and resentencing in death penalty cases; Section 438 of this act relating to the trial procedure for defendants prosecuted for second or subsequent offense; or the provisions of Sections 439 and 440 of this act relating to assessment of punishment in the original trial proceedings.Added by Laws 1990, c. 261, § 1, emerg. eff. May 24, 1990. Amended by Laws 1997, c. 133, § 18, eff. July 1, 1999; Laws 1999, 1st Ex.Sess., c. 5, § 9, eff. July 1, 1999.NOTE: Laws 1998, 1st Ex.Sess., c. 2, § 23 amended the effective date of Laws 1997, c. 133, § 18 from July 1, 1998, to July 1, 1999.
22 OK Stat § 22-951 (2021)
2021 Oklahoma Statutes|Title 22. Criminal Procedure|§22-951. New trial defined - Proceedings on new trial - Former verdict no bar - Capital cases.

|A. A new trial is a reexamination of the issue in the same court, before another jury, after a verdict has been given. The granting of a new trial places the parties in the same position as if no trial had been had. All the testimony must be produced anew except of witnesses who are absent from the state or dead, in which event the evidence of such witnesses on the former trial may be presented; and the former verdict cannot be used or referred to either in evidence or in argument, or be pleaded in bar of any conviction which might have been had under the indictment or information. |B. In capital cases, when an appeal has been taken and the cause has been remanded for a new trial, the court shall proceed as provided in subsection A of this section.C. In capital cases, when an appeal has been taken and the cause has been remanded for resentencing, the prosecutor and court shall proceed as provided in Section 3 of this act.R.L.1910, § 5936.
22 OK Stat § 22-952 (2021)
2021 Oklahoma Statutes|Title 22. Criminal Procedure|§22-952. Grounds for new trial - Affidavits and testimony.

|A court in which a trial has been had upon an issue of fact has power to grant a new trial when a verdict has been rendered against a defendant by which his substantial rights have been prejudiced, upon his application in the following cases only: |First. When the trial has been in his absence, if the charge is for a felony.Second. When the jury have received any evidence out of court, other than that resulting from a view of the premises.Third. When the jury have separated without leave of the court, after retiring to deliberate on their verdict, and before delivering or sealing the same, if it be sealed, or have been guilty of any misconduct by which a fair and due consideration of the case has been prevented.Fourth. When the verdict has been decided by lot, or by any means other than a fair expression of opinion on the part of the jury.Fifth. When the court has misdirected the jury in a matter of law, or has erred in the decision of any question of law arising during the course of the trial.Sixth. When the verdict is contrary to law or evidence.Seventh. When new evidence is discovered, material to the defendant, and which he could not with reasonable diligence have discovered before the trial, or when it can be shown that the grand jury was not drawn summoned or impaneled as provided by law, and that the facts in relation thereto were unknown to the defendant or his attorney until after the trial jury in the case was sworn and were not of record. When a motion for a new trial is made on the ground of newly discovered evidence, the defendant must produce at the hearing in support thereof affidavits of witnesses, or he may take testimony in support thereof as provided in Section 5781, and if time is required by the defendant to procure such affidavits or testimony, the court may postpone the hearing of the motion for such length of time as under all the circumstances of the case may seem reasonable. The application for a new trial on the ground that the grand jury was not drawn summoned or impaneled as provided by law may be shown in like manner.R.L.1910, § 5937.
22 OK Stat § 22-953 (2021)
2021 Oklahoma Statutes|Title 22. Criminal Procedure|§22-953. Time for applying for new trial - Limitations.

|The application for a new trial must be made before judgment is entered; but the court or judge thereof may for good cause shown allow such application to be made at any time within thirty (30) days after the rendition of the judgment. A motion for a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence may be made within three (3) months after such evidence is discovered but no such motion may be filed more than one (1) year after judgment is rendered, and if on the ground that the grand jury was not properly drawn or impaneled then the motion must be made within thirty (30) days after the judgment is rendered. |R.L.1910, § 5938; Laws 1969, c. 117, § 1, emerg. eff. April 3, 1969.
22 OK Stat § 22-954 (2021)
2021 Oklahoma Statutes|Title 22. Criminal Procedure|§22-954. Motion in arrest of judgment - Definition - Grounds - Time for.

|A motion in arrest of judgment is an application on the part of the defendant that no judgment be rendered on plea or verdict of guilty, or on a verdict against the defendant on a plea of former conviction or acquittal. It may be founded on any of the defects in the indictment or information mentioned as grounds of demurrer unless such objection has been waived by a failure to demur, and must be before or at the time the defendant is called for judgment. |R.L.1910, § 5939.
22 OK Stat § 22-955 (2021)
2021 Oklahoma Statutes|Title 22. Criminal Procedure|§22-955. Court may arrest on its own motion - Effect of allowing motion.

|The court may also on its own view of any of these defects, arrest the judgment without motion. The effect of allowing a motion in arrest of judgment is to place the defendant in the same situation in which he was before the indictment or information was filed, and in no case of arrest of judgment is the verdict a bar to another prosecution. |R.L.1910, § 5940.
22 OK Stat § 22-956 (2021)
2021 Oklahoma Statutes|Title 22. Criminal Procedure|§22-956. Proceedings after motion for arrest of judgment sustained.

|If, from the evidence on the trial, there is reasonable ground to believe the defendant guilty, and a new indictment can be framed upon which he may be convicted, the court may order him to be recommitted to the officer of the proper county, or admitted to bail anew to answer the new indictment or information. If the evidence shows him guilty of another offense, he must be committed or held thereon; but if no evidence appears sufficient to charge him with any offense, he must, if in custody, be discharged, or, if admitted to bail, his bail is exonerated, or if money has been deposited instead of bail, it must be refunded to the defendant, and the arrest of judgment operates as an acquittal of the charge upon which the indictment or information was founded. |R.L.1910, § 5941. R.L.1910, § 5941.
22 OK Stat § 22-961 (2021)
2021 Oklahoma Statutes|Title 22. Criminal Procedure|§22-961. Court appoints time for pronouncing judgment.

|After a plea or verdict of guilty, or after a verdict against the defendant on a plea of a former conviction or acquittal, if the judgment is not arrested or a new trial granted, the court must appoint a time for pronouncing judgment. |R.L.1910, § 5942.
22 OK Stat § 22-962 (2021)
2021 Oklahoma Statutes|Title 22. Criminal Procedure|§22-962. Time for pronouncing verdict specified.

|The time appointed must be at least two (2) days after the verdict, if the court intend to remain in session so long; or, if not, at as remote a time as can reasonably be allowed. |R.L.1910, § 5943.
22 OK Stat § 22-963 (2021)
2021 Oklahoma Statutes|Title 22. Criminal Procedure|§22-963. Defendant may be absent, when.

|For the purpose of judgment, if the conviction is for misdemeanor judgment may be pronounced in the defendant's absence, unless such defendant is represented by an attorney of record, in which event, said attorney must be present unless said attorney waives appearance in writing or unless the said attorney has been notified of the time and date of imposition of judgment and fails to appear. |R.L.1910, § 5944; Laws 1968, c. 202, § 1, emerg. eff. April 19, 1968.
22 OK Stat § 22-964 (2021)
2021 Oklahoma Statutes|Title 22. Criminal Procedure|§22-964. Officer may be directed to produce prisoner.

|When the defendant is in custody, the court may direct the officer in whose custody he is to bring him before it for judgment, and the officer must do so accordingly. |R.L.1910, § 5945.
22 OK Stat § 22-965 (2021)
2021 Oklahoma Statutes|Title 22. Criminal Procedure|§22-965. Warrant for defendant not appearing - Forfeiture of bond or bail money.

|If the defendant has been discharged on bail, or has deposited money instead thereof, and does not appear for judgment when his personal attendance is necessary, the court, in addition to the forfeiture of the undertaking of bail or of money deposited, may direct the clerk to issue a bench warrant for his arrest. |R.L.1910, § 5946. 0
22 OK Stat § 22-966 (2021)
2021 Oklahoma Statutes|Title 22. Criminal Procedure|§22-966. Clerk to issue bench warrant - Several counties.

|The clerk, on the application of the district attorney, may, accordingly, at any time after the order, whether the court be sitting or not, issue a bench warrant into one or more counties. |R.L.1910, § 5947.
22 OK Stat § 22-966A (2021)
2021 Oklahoma Statutes|Title 22. Criminal Procedure|§22-966A. Bench warrant, fee for issuance of.

|For the issuance of each bench warrant for a defendant's failure to pay court costs, fines, fees, or assessments in felony, misdemeanor, or traffic cases, the court clerk shall charge and collect a fee of Five Dollars ($5.00). The fee shall be included in the execution bond amount on the face of the bench warrant which is issued for the defendant's failure to pay and shall be in addition to the delinquent amount owed by the defendant. This fee shall be deposited in the court clerk's revolving fund pursuant to the provisions of Section 220 of Title 19 of the Oklahoma Statutes. |Added by Laws 1995, c. 132, § 2, eff. Nov. 1, 1995.
22 OK Stat § 22-967 (2021)
2021 Oklahoma Statutes|Title 22. Criminal Procedure|§22-967. Form of bench warrant.

|The bench warrant must be substantially in the following form: |County of ......................State of Oklahoma.To any sheriff, constable, marshal or policeman in this state:A B having been, on the ........ day of ......... A. D., 19...., duly convicted in the ......... court of the county of ........ of the crime of (designating it generally), you are therefore commanded forthwith to arrest the above-named A B and bring him before that court for judgment, or if the court has adjourned for the term, you are to deliver him into the custody of the sheriff of the county of ........ (as the case may be).Given under my hand, with the seal of said court affixed, this ...... day of ........ A. D., 19....By order of the court.(Seal). E.F., Clerk.R.L.1910, § 5948.
22 OK Stat § 22-968 (2021)
2021 Oklahoma Statutes|Title 22. Criminal Procedure|§22-968. Service of bench warrant, mode of.

|The bench warrant may be served in any county, in the same manner as a warrant of arrest, except that when served in another county, it need not be endorsed by a magistrate of that county. |R.L.1910, § 5949.
22 OK Stat § 22-969 (2021)
2021 Oklahoma Statutes|Title 22. Criminal Procedure|§22-969. Defendant to be arrested.

|Whether the bench warrant is served in the county in which it was issued or in another county, the officer must arrest the defendant and bring him before the court, or commit him to the officer mentioned in the warrant, according to the command thereof. |R.L.1910, § 5950.
22 OK Stat § 22-970 (2021)
2021 Oklahoma Statutes|Title 22. Criminal Procedure|§22-970. Defendant informed of proceedings.

|When the defendant appears for judgment, he must be informed by the court, or by the clerk under its direction, of the nature of the indictment or information, and his plea and the verdict, if any thereon, and must be asked whether he has any legal cause to show why judgment should not be pronounced against him. |R.L.1910, § 5951.