SC Code § 20-3-620 (2021)
2021 South Carolina Code of Laws|Title 20 - Domestic Relations|Chapter 3 - Divorce|Section 20-3-620. Apportionment factors.

 (A) In a proceeding for divorce a vinculo matrimonii or separate support and maintenance, or in a proceeding for disposition of property following a prior decree of dissolution of a marriage by a court which lacked personal jurisdiction over an absent spouse or which lacked jurisdiction to dispose of the property, and in other marital litigation between the parties, the court shall make a final equitable apportionment between the parties of the parties' marital property upon request by either party in the pleadings.  (B) In making apportionment, the court must give weight in such proportion as it finds appropriate to all of the following factors:  (1) the duration of the marriage together with the ages of the parties at the time of the marriage and at the time of the divorce or separate maintenance or other marital action between the parties;  (2) marital misconduct or fault of either or both parties, whether or not used as a basis for a divorce as such, if the misconduct affects or has affected the economic circumstances of the parties, or contributed to the breakup of the marriage; provided, that no evidence of personal conduct which would otherwise be relevant and material for purposes of this subsection shall be considered with regard to this subsection if such conduct shall have taken place subsequent to the happening of the earliest of:  (a) entry of a pendente lite order in a divorce or separate maintenance action;  (b) formal signing of a written property or marital settlement agreement; or  (c) entry of a permanent order of separate maintenance and support or of a permanent order approving a property or marital settlement agreement between the parties;  (3) the value of the marital property, whether the property be within or without the State. The contribution of each spouse to the acquisition, preservation, depreciation, or appreciation in value of the marital property, including the contribution of the spouse as homemaker; provided, that the court shall consider the quality of the contribution as well as its factual existence;  (4) the income of each spouse, the earning potential of each spouse, and the opportunity for future acquisition of capital assets;  (5) the health, both physical and emotional, of each spouse;  (6) the need of each spouse or either spouse for additional training or education in order to achieve that spouses's income potential;  (7) the nonmarital property of each spouse;  (8) the existence or nonexistence of vested retirement benefits for each or either spouse;  (9) whether separate maintenance or alimony has been awarded;  (10) the desirability of awarding the family home as part of equitable distribution or the right to live therein for reasonable periods to the spouse having custody of any children;  (11) the tax consequences to each or either party as a result of any particular form of equitable apportionment;  (12) the existence and extent of any support obligations, from a prior marriage or for any other reason or reasons, of either party;  (13) liens and any other encumbrances upon the marital property, which themselves must be equitably divided, or upon the separate property of either of the parties, and any other existing debts incurred by the parties or either of them during the course of the marriage;  (14) child custody arrangements and obligations at the time of the entry of the order; and  (15) such other relevant factors as the trial court shall expressly enumerate in its order.  (C) The court's order as it affects distribution of marital property shall be a final order not subject to modification except by appeal or remand following proper appeal.  HISTORY: 2008 Act No. 361, Section 3, eff June 16, 2008.  Editor's Note  Prior laws. 1986 Act No. 522 Section 1; 1976 Code Section 20-7-472.