reglab/housing_qa huggingface dataset:
OR Rev Stat § 41.685 (2021)
2021 Oregon Revised Statutes|Volume : 01 - Courts, Oregon Rules of Civil Procedure|Chapter 041 - Evidence Generally|Section 41.685 - Inadmissibility of certain data relating to emergency medical services system.

(1) All data shall be privileged and are not public records as defined in ORS 192.311 and shall not be admissible in evidence in any judicial proceeding except as provided under ORS 676.175. However, nothing in this section affects the admissibility in evidence of a party’s medical records dealing with a party’s medical care. (2) On request, an emergency medical service provider shall submit data not subject to ORS 676.175 to any committee or governing body of the county, counties or state as provided for by state or county administrative rule. (3) A person serving on or communicating information to any governing body or committee shall not be examined as to any communication to that body or committee or the findings thereof. (4) A person serving on or communicating information to any governing body or committee shall not be subject to an action for civil damages for affirmative actions taken or statements made in good faith. (5) As used in this section: (a) "Committee or governing body" means any committee or governing body that has authority to undertake an evaluation of an emergency medical services system as part of a quality assurance program and includes any committee of an emergency medical service provider undertaking a quality assurance program. (b) "Data" means all oral communications or written reports, notes or records provided to, or prepared by or for, a committee or governing body that are part of an evaluation of an emergency medical services system and includes any information submitted by any health care provider relating to training, supervision, performance evaluation or professional competency. (c) "Emergency medical service provider" means any public, private or volunteer entity providing prehospital functions and services that are required to prepare for and respond to medical emergencies including rescue, ambulance, treatment, communication and evaluation. (d) "Emergency medical services system" means those prehospital functions and services that are required to prepare for and respond to medical emergencies, including rescue, ambulance, treatment, communication and evaluation. [1989 c.1079 §1; 1997 c.791 §7; 1997 c.792 §30]
OR Rev Stat § 41.740 (2021)
2021 Oregon Revised Statutes|Volume : 01 - Courts, Oregon Rules of Civil Procedure|Chapter 041 - Evidence Generally|Section 41.740 - Parol evidence rule.

When the terms of an agreement have been reduced to writing by the parties, it is to be considered as containing all those terms, and therefore there can be, between the parties and their representatives or successors in interest, no evidence of the terms of the agreement, other than the contents of the writing, except where a mistake or imperfection of the writing is put in issue by the pleadings or where the validity of the agreement is the fact in dispute. However this section does not exclude other evidence of the circumstances under which the agreement was made, or to which it relates, as defined in ORS 42.220, or to explain an ambiguity, intrinsic or extrinsic, or to establish illegality or fraud. The term "agreement" includes deeds and wills as well as contracts between parties.
OR Rev Stat § 41.815 (2021)
2021 Oregon Revised Statutes|Volume : 01 - Courts, Oregon Rules of Civil Procedure|Chapter 041 - Evidence Generally|Section 41.815 - Evidence of compliance with or attempt to comply with ORCP 32 I; when admissible.

Attempts to comply with the provisions of ORCP 32 I by a person receiving a demand shall be construed to be an offer to compromise and shall be inadmissible as evidence. Such attempts to comply with a demand shall not be considered an admission of engaging in the act or practice alleged to be unlawful nor of the unlawfulness of that act. Evidence of compliance or attempts to comply with the provisions of ORCP 32 I may be introduced by a defendant for the purpose of establishing good faith or to show compliance with the provisions of ORCP 32 I. [Formerly 13.310; 1981 c.912 §3]
OR Rev Stat § 41.905 (2021)
2021 Oregon Revised Statutes|Volume : 01 - Courts, Oregon Rules of Civil Procedure|Chapter 041 - Evidence Generally|Section 41.905 - Admissibility in subsequent civil action of procedures in traffic crimes.

A plea to a charge of a traffic crime, as defined in ORS 801.545, and any judgment of conviction or acquittal of a person charged with a traffic crime, as defined by ORS 801.545, are not admissible in the trial of a subsequent civil action arising out of the same accident or occurrence to prove or negate the facts upon which such judgment was rendered. [1975 c.542 §1; 1981 c.892 §87; 1999 c.1051 §242; 2007 c.784 §6; 2011 c.597 §30]
OR Rev Stat § 41.910 (2021)
2021 Oregon Revised Statutes|Volume : 01 - Courts, Oregon Rules of Civil Procedure|Chapter 041 - Evidence Generally|Section 41.910 - Certain intercepted communications inadmissible.

Evidence of the contents of any wire or oral communication intercepted: (1) In violation of ORS 165.540 shall not be admissible in any court of this state, except as evidence of unlawful interception or when the evidence was created by the use of a video camera worn upon a law enforcement officer’s person and the officer either substantially complied with or attempted in good faith to comply with ORS 165.540 (5)(d)(B). (2) Under ORS 165.540 (2)(a) shall not be admissible in any court of this state unless: (a) The communication was intercepted by a public official in charge of and at a jail, police premises, sheriff’s office, Department of Corrections institution or other penal or correctional institution; and (b) The participant in the communication, against whom the evidence is being offered, had actual notice that the communication was being monitored or recorded. [1955 c.675 §6; 1959 c.681 §5; 1979 c.716 §12; 1983 c.824 §4; 1993 c.178 §1; 2001 c.385 §5; 2015 c.550 §3]
OR Rev Stat § 41.930 (2021)
2021 Oregon Revised Statutes|Volume : 01 - Courts, Oregon Rules of Civil Procedure|Chapter 041 - Evidence Generally|Section 41.930 - Admissibility of copies of original records.

The copy of the records described in ORCP 55 H or ORS 136.447 is admissible in evidence to the same extent as though the original thereof were offered and a custodian of hospital records had been present and testified to the matters stated in the affidavit. The affidavit is admissible as evidence of the matters stated therein. The matters stated therein are presumed to be true. The presumption established by this section is a presumption affecting the burden of producing evidence. [1973 c.263 §4; 1979 c.284 §77; 1995 c.196 §4] Note: ORCP 55 was repealed and replaced by the Council on Court Procedures Amendments promulgated on December 8, 2018, and effective January 1, 2020. The text of 41.930 was not amended by enactment of the Legislative Assembly to reflect the repeal. Editorial adjustment of 41.930 for the repeal of ORCP 55 has not been made. See the ORCP 55 Cross-Reference Chart available from the Council on Court Procedures.
OR Rev Stat § 41.945 (2021)
2021 Oregon Revised Statutes|Volume : 01 - Courts, Oregon Rules of Civil Procedure|Chapter 041 - Evidence Generally|Section 41.945 - Application of ORS 41.930 and ORCP 55 H.

ORS 41.930 and ORCP 55 H apply in any proceedings in which testimony may be compelled. [1973 c.263 §8; 1979 c.284 §78] Note: ORCP 55 was repealed and replaced by the Council on Court Procedures Amendments promulgated on December 8, 2018, and effective January 1, 2020. The text of 41.945 was not amended by enactment of the Legislative Assembly to reflect the repeal. Editorial adjustment of 41.945 for the repeal of ORCP 55 has not been made. See the ORCP 55 Cross-Reference Chart available from the Council on Court Procedures.
OR Rev Stat § 41.950 (2021)
2021 Oregon Revised Statutes|Volume : 01 - Courts, Oregon Rules of Civil Procedure|Chapter 041 - Evidence Generally|Section 41.950

[1971 c.331 §1; renumbered 18.500]
OR Rev Stat § 41.960 (2021)
2021 Oregon Revised Statutes|Volume : 01 - Courts, Oregon Rules of Civil Procedure|Chapter 041 - Evidence Generally|Section 41.960

[1971 c.331 §2; renumbered 18.520]
OR Rev Stat § 41.970 (2021)
2021 Oregon Revised Statutes|Volume : 01 - Courts, Oregon Rules of Civil Procedure|Chapter 041 - Evidence Generally|Section 41.970

[1971 c.331 §3; renumbered 18.530]
OR Rev Stat § 42.010 (2021)
2021 Oregon Revised Statutes|Volume : 01 - Courts, Oregon Rules of Civil Procedure|Chapter 042 - Execution, Formalities and Interpretation of Writings|Section 42.010 - Private writings.

All writings, other than public writings, are private and may be sealed or unsealed.
OR Rev Stat § 42.020 (2021)
2021 Oregon Revised Statutes|Volume : 01 - Courts, Oregon Rules of Civil Procedure|Chapter 042 - Execution, Formalities and Interpretation of Writings|Section 42.020 - Execution of a writing.

The execution of a writing is the subscribing and delivering it, with or without affixing a seal.
OR Rev Stat § 42.030 (2021)
2021 Oregon Revised Statutes|Volume : 01 - Courts, Oregon Rules of Civil Procedure|Chapter 042 - Execution, Formalities and Interpretation of Writings|Section 42.030 - Subscribing witness.

A subscribing witness is one who sees a writing executed, or hears it acknowledged, and at the request of the party thereupon signs one’s name as a witness.
OR Rev Stat § 42.040 (2021)
2021 Oregon Revised Statutes|Volume : 01 - Courts, Oregon Rules of Civil Procedure|Chapter 042 - Execution, Formalities and Interpretation of Writings|Section 42.040 - Proof of attested writing other than a will.

Any attested writing other than a will may be proved in the same manner as though it had not been attested.
OR Rev Stat § 42.110 (2021)
2021 Oregon Revised Statutes|Volume : 01 - Courts, Oregon Rules of Civil Procedure|Chapter 042 - Execution, Formalities and Interpretation of Writings|Section 42.110 - Seal defined.

A seal is a particular sign made to attest in the most formal manner the execution of an instrument.
OR Rev Stat § 42.115 (2021)
2021 Oregon Revised Statutes|Volume : 01 - Courts, Oregon Rules of Civil Procedure|Chapter 042 - Execution, Formalities and Interpretation of Writings|Section 42.115 - Effect of presence or absence of seal.

The presence or absence of a seal, corporate or otherwise, shall have no effect upon the validity, enforceability or character of any written instrument except where specifically otherwise provided by statute. A writing under seal may be modified or discharged by writing not under seal or by a valid oral agreement. [1965 c.502 §2]
OR Rev Stat § 42.125 (2021)
2021 Oregon Revised Statutes|Volume : 01 - Courts, Oregon Rules of Civil Procedure|Chapter 042 - Execution, Formalities and Interpretation of Writings|Section 42.125 - Seal of state officer or state agency authorized.

(1) For the purposes of ORS 40.510 (1)(a) and (d), each state officer and state agency may have a seal which, unless specifically provided otherwise by law, shall consist of an impression, imprint or likeness of the state seal accompanied by the name of the state officer or state agency. (2) As used in this section: (a) "Seal" has the meaning given that term in ORS 42.110. (b) "State agency" means every state officer, board, commission, department, institution, branch or agency of the state government, except: (A) The Legislative Assembly and the courts and their officers and committees; and (B) The Public Defense Services Commission. (c) "State officer" includes any appointed state official who is authorized by the Oregon Department of Administrative Services to have a seal and any elected state official, except members of the Legislative Assembly. [1982 s.s.1 c.14 §1; 2003 c.449 §23; 2005 c.22 §32]
OR Rev Stat § 42.210 (2021)
2021 Oregon Revised Statutes|Volume : 01 - Courts, Oregon Rules of Civil Procedure|Chapter 042 - Execution, Formalities and Interpretation of Writings|Section 42.210 - Effect of the place of execution.

The language of a writing is to be interpreted according to the meaning it bears in the place of execution, unless the parties have reference to a different place.
OR Rev Stat § 42.220 (2021)
2021 Oregon Revised Statutes|Volume : 01 - Courts, Oregon Rules of Civil Procedure|Chapter 042 - Execution, Formalities and Interpretation of Writings|Section 42.220 - Consideration of circumstances.

In construing an instrument, the circumstances under which it was made, including the situation of the subject and of the parties, may be shown so that the judge is placed in the position of those whose language the judge is interpreting.
OR Rev Stat § 42.230 (2021)
2021 Oregon Revised Statutes|Volume : 01 - Courts, Oregon Rules of Civil Procedure|Chapter 042 - Execution, Formalities and Interpretation of Writings|Section 42.230 - Office of judge in construing instruments.

In the construction of an instrument, the office of the judge is simply to ascertain and declare what is, in terms or in substance, contained therein, not to insert what has been omitted, or to omit what has been inserted; and where there are several provisions or particulars, such construction is, if possible, to be adopted as will give effect to all.
OR Rev Stat § 42.240 (2021)
2021 Oregon Revised Statutes|Volume : 01 - Courts, Oregon Rules of Civil Procedure|Chapter 042 - Execution, Formalities and Interpretation of Writings|Section 42.240 - Intention of the parties; general and particular provisions and intents.

In the construction of an instrument the intention of the parties is to be pursued if possible; and when a general and particular provision are inconsistent, the latter is paramount to the former. So a particular intent shall control a general one that is inconsistent with it.
OR Rev Stat § 42.250 (2021)
2021 Oregon Revised Statutes|Volume : 01 - Courts, Oregon Rules of Civil Procedure|Chapter 042 - Execution, Formalities and Interpretation of Writings|Section 42.250 - Terms construed as generally accepted; evidence of other signification.

The terms of a writing are presumed to have been used in their primary and general acceptation, but evidence is admissible that they have a technical, local, or otherwise peculiar signification and were used and understood in the particular instance, in which case the agreement shall be construed accordingly.
OR Rev Stat § 42.260 (2021)
2021 Oregon Revised Statutes|Volume : 01 - Courts, Oregon Rules of Civil Procedure|Chapter 042 - Execution, Formalities and Interpretation of Writings|Section 42.260 - Ambiguous terms.

When the terms of an agreement have been intended in a different sense by the parties, that sense is to prevail, against either party, in which the party supposed the other understood it. When different constructions of a provision are otherwise equally proper, that construction is to be taken which is most favorable to the party in whose favor the provision was made.
OR Rev Stat § 42.270 (2021)
2021 Oregon Revised Statutes|Volume : 01 - Courts, Oregon Rules of Civil Procedure|Chapter 042 - Execution, Formalities and Interpretation of Writings|Section 42.270 - Written words control printed form.

When an instrument consists partly of written words and partly of a printed form, and the two are inconsistent, the former controls.
OR Rev Stat § 42.280 (2021)
2021 Oregon Revised Statutes|Volume : 01 - Courts, Oregon Rules of Civil Procedure|Chapter 042 - Execution, Formalities and Interpretation of Writings|Section 42.280 - Deciphering characters and translating languages.

When the characters in which an instrument is written are difficult to be deciphered, or the language is not understood by the court, evidence of persons skilled in deciphering the characters, or who understand the language, is admissible to declare the characters or the meaning of the language.
OR Rev Stat § 42.290 (2021)
2021 Oregon Revised Statutes|Volume : 01 - Courts, Oregon Rules of Civil Procedure|Chapter 042 - Execution, Formalities and Interpretation of Writings|Section 42.290 - Construction of notices.

A written notice is to be construed according to the ordinary acceptation of its terms. Thus, a notice to the drawers or indorsers of a bill of exchange or promissory note, that it has been protested for want of acceptance or payment, shall be held to import that it has been duly presented for acceptance or payment and refused, and that the holder looks for payment to the person to whom the notice is given.
OR Rev Stat § 42.300 (2021)
2021 Oregon Revised Statutes|Volume : 01 - Courts, Oregon Rules of Civil Procedure|Chapter 042 - Execution, Formalities and Interpretation of Writings|Section 42.300 - Parties to written instrument not to deny facts recited therein.

Except for the recital of a consideration, the truth of the facts recited from the recital in a written instrument shall not be denied by the parties thereto, their representatives or successors in interest by a subsequent title. [1981 c.892 §83]
OR Rev Stat § 43.130 (2021)
2021 Oregon Revised Statutes|Volume : 01 - Courts, Oregon Rules of Civil Procedure|Chapter 043 - Public Writings|Section 43.130 - Judicial orders that are conclusive.

The effect of a judgment, decree or final order in an action, suit or proceeding before a court or judge of this state or of the United States, having jurisdiction is as follows: (1) In case of a judgment, decree or order against a specific thing or in respect to the probate of a will or the administration of the estate of a deceased person or in respect to the personal, political, or legal condition or relation of a particular person, the judgment, decree or order is conclusive upon the title to the thing, the will or administration, or the condition or relation of the person. (2) In other cases, the judgment, decree or order is, in respect to the matter directly determined, conclusive between the parties, their representatives and their successors in interest by title subsequent to the commencement of the action, suit or proceeding, litigating for the same thing, under the same title and in the same capacity.
OR Rev Stat § 43.140 (2021)
2021 Oregon Revised Statutes|Volume : 01 - Courts, Oregon Rules of Civil Procedure|Chapter 043 - Public Writings|Section 43.140 - Judicial orders that create a disputable presumption.

A judicial order, other than a judgment, decree or final order, in an action, suit or proceeding before a court or judge of this state or of the United States creates a disputable presumption concerning the matter directly determined between the same parties, their representatives and their successors in interest by title subsequent to the commencement of the action, suit or proceeding, litigating for the same thing, under the same title and in the same capacity.
OR Rev Stat § 43.150 (2021)
2021 Oregon Revised Statutes|Volume : 01 - Courts, Oregon Rules of Civil Procedure|Chapter 043 - Public Writings|Section 43.150 - When parties the same.

The parties are the same when those between whom the evidence is offered were adverse in the former case, and a judgment, decree or other determination could have been made between them alone, though other parties were joined.
OR Rev Stat § 43.160 (2021)
2021 Oregon Revised Statutes|Volume : 01 - Courts, Oregon Rules of Civil Procedure|Chapter 043 - Public Writings|Section 43.160 - What determined by former judgment.

That only is determined by a former judgment, decree or order which appears upon its face to have been so determined or which was actually and necessarily included therein or necessary thereto.
OR Rev Stat § 43.170 (2021)
2021 Oregon Revised Statutes|Volume : 01 - Courts, Oregon Rules of Civil Procedure|Chapter 043 - Public Writings|Section 43.170 - Effect on principal of judgment against surety.

Whenever, pursuant to ORS 43.130 to 43.160, a party is bound by a record, and stands in the relation of surety for another, the latter is also bound from the time that the latter has notice of the action, suit or proceeding and a request from the surety to defend against it.
OR Rev Stat § 43.180 (2021)
2021 Oregon Revised Statutes|Volume : 01 - Courts, Oregon Rules of Civil Procedure|Chapter 043 - Public Writings|Section 43.180 - Effect of judicial record of other jurisdictions.

The effect of a judicial record of a sister state, the District of Columbia or a territory of the United States is the same in this state as in the place where it was made, except: (1) It can be enforced in this state only by an action, suit or proceeding; and (2) The authority of a guardian, conservator, committee, executor or administrator does not extend beyond the jurisdiction of the government under which the guardian, conservator, committee, executor or administrator is invested with authority. [Amended by 1973 c.823 §90; 2005 c.22 §33]
OR Rev Stat § 43.200 (2021)
2021 Oregon Revised Statutes|Volume : 01 - Courts, Oregon Rules of Civil Procedure|Chapter 043 - Public Writings|Section 43.200 - Effect of judicial record of foreign admiralty court.

The effect of a judicial record of a court of admiralty of a foreign country is the same as if it were the record of a court of admiralty of the United States.
OR Rev Stat § 43.220 (2021)
2021 Oregon Revised Statutes|Volume : 01 - Courts, Oregon Rules of Civil Procedure|Chapter 043 - Public Writings|Section 43.220 - Impeachment of judicial record.

Any judicial record may be impeached and the presumption arising therefrom overcome by evidence of a want of jurisdiction, collusion between the parties, or fraud in the party offering the record. The jurisdiction sufficient to sustain a record is jurisdiction over the cause, over the parties and, when a specific thing is the subject of the determination, over the thing.
OR Rev Stat § 43.380 (2021)
2021 Oregon Revised Statutes|Volume : 01 - Courts, Oregon Rules of Civil Procedure|Chapter 043 - Public Writings|Section 43.380

[Renumbered 432.175]
OR Rev Stat § 43.450 (2021)
2021 Oregon Revised Statutes|Volume : 01 - Courts, Oregon Rules of Civil Procedure|Chapter 043 - Public Writings|Section 43.450 - Official records and files of United States Army, Navy and Air Force.

Relevant official records and files of the Departments of the Army, Navy and Air Force of the United States shall be accorded prima facie probative value in evidence before any court or agency in which there is an issue of fact as to the death or disappearance of any person while serving in or with the Armed Forces of the United States.
OR Rev Stat § 44.080 (2021)
2021 Oregon Revised Statutes|Volume : 01 - Courts, Oregon Rules of Civil Procedure|Chapter 044 - Witnesses|Section 44.080 - Protection of witness from improper questions and excessive detention.

It is the right of a witness to be protected from irrelevant, insulting or improper questions, and from harsh or insulting demeanor. The witness is to be detained only so long as the interests of justice require.