reglab/housing_qa huggingface dataset:
NM Stat § 66-8-137 (2021)
2021 New Mexico Statutes|Chapter 66 - Motor Vehicles|Article 8 - Crimes, Penalties and Procedure|Part 2 - TRAFFIC OFFENSES|Section 66-8-137 - Compensation of judges and officers; defenses to prosecution.

A. No municipality or other political subdivision of this state shall employ any municipal judge, officer, agent or other person whose compensation in any way depends upon the apprehension, arrest or conviction of any person for violating the Motor Vehicle Code [66-1-1 NMSA 1978] or other state or local law, ordinance or regulation. B. If any person is arrested or brought to trial for violation of the Motor Vehicle Code or other law, ordinance or regulation relating to motor vehicles punishable as a misdemeanor by any officer, agent or employee of any political subdivision, or before any municipal judge, whose compensation depends in any way upon the arrest or conviction of persons violating these laws, ordinances or regulations, the fact of such compensation or that the person making the arrest was not in uniform at the time is a defense to the charge. History: 1941 Comp., § 68-2613, enacted by Laws 1953, ch. 139, § 191.1; 1953 Comp., § 64-22-16; Laws 1968, ch. 62, § 167; recompiled as 1953 Comp., § 64-8-137, by Laws 1978, ch. 35, § 545. ANNOTATIONSCross references. — For magistrate courts, see 35-1-1 NMSA 1978 et seq. Incremental payment for targeting the motoring public. — Where defendant was arrested and charged in magistrate court with aggravated DWI; the officer's salary included incremental pay financed from a grant to assist the police department in targeting the motoring public; as part of the officer's duties, the officer was charged with arresting and convicting individuals for offenses that included DWI; the officer was required to submit monthly statistics which the police department used to report the number of accidents investigated and DWI arrests made; the officer's salary increased approximately two dollars per hour as a result of the grant; the officer's pay did not fluctuate with the number of arrests the officer made; and there was no evidence that the officer was required to actually arrest or convict a certain number of individuals in order for the police department to be eligible for the grant, that the officer was required to meet certain quotas to be eligible for the grant, or that the officer's pay was linked to the number of arrests or convictions, the officer's receipt of pay from the grant and the officer's obligation under the grant to make monthly statistical reports did not give rise to a defense under 66-8-137(B) NMSA 1978. State v. Sanchez, 2014-NMCA-095. This section provides that municipal magistrate's salary cannot depend upon arrests and convictions for violations under the Motor Vehicle Code. 1969 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 69-129.
NM Stat § 66-8-137.2 (2021)
2021 New Mexico Statutes|Chapter 66 - Motor Vehicles|Article 8 - Crimes, Penalties and Procedure|Part 2 - TRAFFIC OFFENSES|Section 66-8-137.2 - Nonresident Violator Compact; definitions.

As used in the Nonresident Violator Compact: A. "jurisdiction executive" means the governor; and B. "licensing authority" means the director. The director shall furnish to the appropriate authorities of any other party state any information or documents reasonably necessary to facilitate the administration of the Nonresident Violator Compact. History: Laws 1981, ch. 360, § 15; 1987, ch. 268, § 32. ANNOTATIONSThe 1987 amendment, effective July 1, 1987, in Subsection B deleted "of the motor vehicle division of the transportation department" from the end of the first sentence.
NM Stat § 66-8-137.3 (2021)
2021 New Mexico Statutes|Chapter 66 - Motor Vehicles|Article 8 - Crimes, Penalties and Procedure|Part 2 - TRAFFIC OFFENSES|Section 66-8-137.3 - Compact administrator; compensation.

The compact administrator for New Mexico, appointed by the governor, is not entitled to any compensation for his duties as administrator, but he may be reimbursed in accordance with the Per Diem and Mileage Act [10-8-1 to 10-8-8 NMSA 1978]. History: Laws 1981, ch. 360, § 16.
NM Stat § 66-8-137.4 (2021)
2021 New Mexico Statutes|Chapter 66 - Motor Vehicles|Article 8 - Crimes, Penalties and Procedure|Part 2 - TRAFFIC OFFENSES|Section 66-8-137.4 - Bilateral agreements; noncompact jurisdictions; authority.

A. In addition to the Nonresident Violator Compact, it is the intent of the legislature that bilateral agreements be made with noncompact states; in particular, with those neighboring states which provide much of the traffic on New Mexico's highways and have not yet joined with the compact states. The purpose of such bilateral agreement is to accomplish the same reciprocal services and procedures that are provided in the Nonresident Violator Compact. If, in the judgment of the secretary of taxation and revenue of New Mexico, a bilateral agreement is in the best interest of the citizens of New Mexico, is fair and equitable and provides comparable benefits, privileges and exemptions to each state, the secretary is authorized to pledge New Mexico to the bilateral agreement and is signatory for this state. B. It is the intent of the legislature that bilateral agreements be made with Indian tribes and pueblos. The purpose of such bilateral agreements is to provide for the administrative adjudication of motor vehicle offenses committed by Indians on Indian land. History: Laws 1981, ch. 360, § 17; 1987, ch. 268, § 33. ANNOTATIONSThe 1987 amendment, effective July 1, 1987, in Subsection A, in the third sentence, substituted "secretary of taxation and revenue" for "secretary of transportation" and made minor changes in language and punctuation throughout the section.
NM Stat § 66-8-139 (2021)
2021 New Mexico Statutes|Chapter 66 - Motor Vehicles|Article 8 - Crimes, Penalties and Procedure|Part 2 - TRAFFIC OFFENSES|Section 66-8-139 - Penalties.

A. Whoever is guilty of a second or subsequent violation of any provision of Section 66-8-138 NMSA 1978 is guilty of a misdemeanor and shall be sentenced pursuant to the provisions of Section 66-8-7 NMSA 1978. B. In addition to any other penalty or disposition ordered pursuant to law, upon conviction for a second or subsequent violation of the provisions of Section 66-8-138 NMSA 1978, the convicted person shall have his driver's license revoked for a period of three months upon a second violation and for one year upon a third or subsequent violation. C. This section does not affect the authority of a municipality under a proper ordinance to prescribe penalties for possession or consumption of alcoholic beverages while driving a motor vehicle. A violation under a municipal ordinance prescribing penalties for possession or consumption of alcoholic beverages while driving a motor vehicle shall be deemed to be a violation under this section for purposes of determining second, third and subsequent violations of this section. History: 1978 Comp., § 66-8-139, enacted by Laws 1989, ch. 316, § 3; 1991, ch. 192, § 10. ANNOTATIONSRepeals and reenactments. — Laws 1989, ch. 316, § 3, repealed former 66-8-139 NMSA 1978, as enacted by Laws 1978, ch. 35, § 547, relating to penalty for violation, and enacted a new 66-8-139 NMSA 1978, effective June 16, 1989. The 1991 amendment, effective June 14, 1991, rewrote Subsection A to substitute "and shall be sentenced pursuant to the provisions of Section 66-8-7 NMSA 1978" for specific penalty provisions.
NM Stat § 66-8-140 (2021)
2021 New Mexico Statutes|Chapter 66 - Motor Vehicles|Article 8 - Crimes, Penalties and Procedure|Part 2 - TRAFFIC OFFENSES|Section 66-8-140 - Repealed.

ANNOTATIONSRepeals. — Laws 1990, ch. 120, § 45 repealed 66-8-140 NMSA 1978, as enacted by Laws 1978, ch. 35, § 548, relating to definition of "alcoholic beverages", effective July 1, 1990. For provisions of former section, see the 1989 NMSA 1978 on NMOneSource.com. For present comparable provisions, see 66-1-4.1 NMSA 1978.
NM Stat § 66-8-141 (2021)
2021 New Mexico Statutes|Chapter 66 - Motor Vehicles|Article 8 - Crimes, Penalties and Procedure|Part 2 - TRAFFIC OFFENSES|Section 66-8-141 - Dishonored checks; civil penalty.

A. Any person who pays any fee pursuant to the Motor Vehicle Code [66-1-1 NMSA 1978] by check to the department and which check is dishonored upon presentation is liable to the department for the fees together with a penalty of not less than ten dollars ($10.00) for each such check. B. Any identification card, license, permit, registration, plate, title or other document issued by the department pursuant to the Motor Vehicle Code that requires payment and the payment is not made because the check offered in payment is dishonored upon presentation shall be canceled, suspended or revoked for failure to make payment. Any reinstatement fee due pursuant to Section 66-5-33.1 NMSA 1978 shall be in addition to the penalty provided for in Subsection A of this section. History: 1953 Comp., § 64-6-34, enacted by Laws 1978, ch. 35, § 369; 1989, ch. 318, § 20; 1991, ch. 160, § 14; 1978 Comp., § 66-6-34, recompiled as 1978 Comp., § 66-8-141 by Laws 1995, ch. 135, § 28. ANNOTATIONSThe 1991 amendment, effective July 1, 1991, deleted "Motor vehicle division fees" at the beginning of the section heading; substituted "department" for "division" in three places; inserted "pursuant to the Motor Vehicle Code" in two places; substituted "not less than ten dollars ($10.00)" for "five dollars ($5.00)" in Subsection A; and, in the second sentence in Subsection B, deleted "or 66-5-223" preceding "NMSA 1978" and "five dollar ($5.00)" preceding "penalty". The 1989 amendment, effective July 1, 1989, designated the formerly undesignated provisions as Subsection A, making a minor stylistic change therein, and added Subsection B.
NM Stat § 40-6A-202 (2021)
2021 New Mexico Statutes|Chapter 40 - Domestic Affairs|Article 6A - Uniform Interstate Family Support|Article 2 - JURISDICTION|Part A - EXTENDED PERSONAL JURISDICTION|Section 40-6A-202 - Duration of personal jurisdiction.

Personal jurisdiction acquired by a tribunal of this state in a proceeding under the Uniform Interstate Family Support Act or other law of this state relating to a support order continues as long as a tribunal of this state has continuing, exclusive jurisdiction to modify its order or continuing jurisdiction to enforce its order as provided by Sections 40-6A-205, 40-6A-206 and 40-6A-211 NMSA 1978. History: Laws 1994, ch. 107, § 202; repealed and reenacted by Laws 2005, ch. 166, § 4. ANNOTATIONSRepeal and reenactments. — Laws 2005, ch. 166, § 4 repealed and reenacted 40-6A-202 NMSA 1978, effective June 17, 2005.
NM Stat § 40-6A-203 (2021)
2021 New Mexico Statutes|Chapter 40 - Domestic Affairs|Article 6A - Uniform Interstate Family Support|Article 2 - JURISDICTION|Part B - PROCEEDINGS INVOLVING TWO OR MORE STATES|Section 40-6A-203 - Initiating and responding tribunal of state.

Pursuant to the Uniform Interstate Family Support Act, a tribunal of this state may serve as an initiating tribunal to forward proceedings to a tribunal of another state or a foreign country and as a responding tribunal for proceedings initiated in another state or a foreign country. History: Laws 1994, ch. 107, § 203; 1997, ch. 9, § 3; 2011, ch. 159, § 6. ANNOTATIONSCompiler's notes. — Laws 2016, ch. 61, § 1 repealed Laws 2011, ch. 159, §§ 69 and 70, an applicability clause and contingent effective date, respectively, effective May 18, 2016, thereby making Laws 2011, ch. 159, §§ 1 through 68, effective May 18, 2016. For provisions of Laws 2011, ch. 159, §§ 69 and 70, see compiler's note to 40-6A-100 NMSA 1978. The 2011 amendment, effective May 18, 2016, included foreign countries within the scope of this section. The 1997 amendment, effective July 1, 1997, deleted "this" following "of" from the section heading.
NM Stat § 40-6A-204 (2021)
2021 New Mexico Statutes|Chapter 40 - Domestic Affairs|Article 6A - Uniform Interstate Family Support|Article 2 - JURISDICTION|Part B - PROCEEDINGS INVOLVING TWO OR MORE STATES|Section 40-6A-204 - Simultaneous proceedings.

A. A tribunal of this state may exercise jurisdiction to establish a support order if the petition or comparable pleading is filed after a petition or comparable pleading is filed in another state or a foreign country only if: (1) the petition or comparable pleading in this state is filed before the expiration of the time allowed in the other state or the foreign country for filing a responsive pleading challenging the exercise of jurisdiction by the other state or the foreign country; (2) the contesting party timely challenges the exercise of jurisdiction in the other state or the foreign country; and (3) if relevant, this state is the home state of the child. B. A tribunal of this state may not exercise jurisdiction to establish a support order if the petition or comparable pleading is filed before a petition or comparable pleading is filed in another state or a foreign country if: (1) the petition or comparable pleading in the other state or foreign country is filed before the expiration of the time allowed in this state for filing a responsive pleading challenging the exercise of jurisdiction by this state; (2) the contesting party timely challenges the exercise of jurisdiction in this state; and (3) if relevant, the other state or foreign country is the home state of the child. History: Laws 1994, ch. 107, § 204; 2005, ch. 166, § 5; 2011, ch. 159, § 7. ANNOTATIONSCompiler's notes. — Laws 2016, ch. 61, § 1 repealed Laws 2011, ch. 159, §§ 69 and 70, an applicability clause and contingent effective date, respectively, effective May 18, 2016, thereby making Laws 2011, ch. 159, §§ 1 through 68, effective May 18, 2016. For provisions of Laws 2011, ch. 159, §§ 69 and 70, see compiler's note to 40-6A-100 NMSA 1978. The 2011 amendment, effective May 18, 2016, included foreign countries within the scope of this section. The 2005 amendment, effective June 17, 2005, deleted "in another state" from the catchline.
NM Stat § 40-6A-206 (2021)
2021 New Mexico Statutes|Chapter 40 - Domestic Affairs|Article 6A - Uniform Interstate Family Support|Article 2 - JURISDICTION|Part B - PROCEEDINGS INVOLVING TWO OR MORE STATES|Section 40-6A-206 - Continuing jurisdiction to enforce child-support order.

A. A tribunal of this state that has issued a child-support order consistent with the law of this state may serve as an initiating tribunal to request a tribunal of another state to enforce: (1) the order if the order is the controlling order and has not been modified by a tribunal of another state that assumed jurisdiction pursuant to the Uniform Interstate Family Support Act; or (2) a money judgment for arrears of support and interest on the order accrued before a determination that an order of a tribunal of another state is the controlling order. B. A tribunal of this state having continuing jurisdiction over a support order may act as a responding tribunal to enforce the order. History: Laws 1994, ch. 107, § 206; 2005, ch. 166, § 7; 2011, ch. 159, § 9. ANNOTATIONSCompiler's notes. — Laws 2016, ch. 61, § 1 repealed Laws 2011, ch. 159, §§ 69 and 70, an applicability clause and contingent effective date, respectively, effective May 18, 2016, thereby making Laws 2011, ch. 159, §§ 1 through 68, effective May 18, 2016. For provisions of Laws 2011, ch. 159, §§ 69 and 70, see compiler's note to 40-6A-100 NMSA 1978. The 2011 amendment, effective May 18, 2016, made stylistic changes. The 2005 amendment, effective June 17, 2005, added Subsections (a)(1) and (2) to provide that a New Mexico tribunal may request a tribunal of another state to enforce a New Mexico child-support order or a money judgment for arrears of support; deleted language in Subsection (b) which provided that if a party did not reside in the issuing state, then a tribunal could receive evidence or discovery from another state; and deleted Subsection (c) which provided that a New Mexico tribunal that lacks jurisdiction over a spousal order cannot serve as a responding tribunal to modify the other of another state.
NM Stat § 40-6A-208 (2021)
2021 New Mexico Statutes|Chapter 40 - Domestic Affairs|Article 6A - Uniform Interstate Family Support|Article 2 - JURISDICTION|Part C - RECONCILIATION WITH ORDERS OF OTHER STATES|Section 40-6A-208 - Child support orders for two or more obligees.

In responding to registrations or petitions for enforcement of two or more child support orders in effect at the same time with regard to the same obligor and different individual obligees, at least one of which was issued by a tribunal of another state or a foreign country, a tribunal of this state shall enforce those orders in the same manner as if the orders had been issued by a tribunal of this state. History: Laws 1994, ch. 107, § 208; 2005, ch. 166, § 9; 2011, ch. 159, § 11. ANNOTATIONSCompiler's notes. — Laws 2016, ch. 61, § 1 repealed Laws 2011, ch. 159, §§ 69 and 70, an applicability clause and contingent effective date, respectively, effective May 18, 2016, thereby making Laws 2011, ch. 159, §§ 1 through 68, effective May 18, 2016. For provisions of Laws 2011, ch. 159, §§ 69 and 70, see compiler's note to 40-6A-100 NMSA 1978. The 2011 amendment, effective May 18, 2016, included tribunals of foreign countries within the scope of this section. The 2005 amendment, effective June 17, 2005, deleted "multiple" in two places.
NM Stat § 40-6A-209 (2021)
2021 New Mexico Statutes|Chapter 40 - Domestic Affairs|Article 6A - Uniform Interstate Family Support|Article 2 - JURISDICTION|Part C - RECONCILIATION WITH ORDERS OF OTHER STATES|Section 40-6A-209 - Credit for payments.

A tribunal of this state shall credit amounts collected for a particular period pursuant to any child-support order against the amounts owed for the same period under any other child-support order for support of the same child issued by a tribunal of this or another state or a foreign country. History: Laws 1994, ch. 107, § 209; 2005, ch. 166, § 10; 2011, ch. 159, § 12. ANNOTATIONSCompiler's notes. — Laws 2016, ch. 61, § 1 repealed Laws 2011, ch. 159, §§ 69 and 70, an applicability clause and contingent effective date, respectively, effective May 18, 2016, thereby making Laws 2011, ch. 159, §§ 1 through 68, effective May 18, 2016. For provisions of Laws 2011, ch. 159, §§ 69 and 70, see compiler's note to 40-6A-100 NMSA 1978. The 2011 amendment, effective May 18, 2016, included tribunals of foreign countries within the scope of this section. The 2005 amendment, effective June 17, 2005, provided that a New Mexico tribunal shall credit amounts collected for a particular period against the amount owed for the same period under any other child-support order for the same child.
NM Stat § 40-6A-210 (2021)
2021 New Mexico Statutes|Chapter 40 - Domestic Affairs|Article 6A - Uniform Interstate Family Support|Article 2 - JURISDICTION|Part C - RECONCILIATION WITH ORDERS OF OTHER STATES|Section 40-6A-210 - Application of the Uniform Interstate Family Support Act to a nonresident subject to personal jurisdiction.

A tribunal of this state exercising personal jurisdiction over a nonresident in a proceeding pursuant to the Uniform Interstate Family Support Act, pursuant to other law of this state relating to a support order or recognizing a foreign support order may receive evidence from outside this state pursuant to Section 40-6A-316 NMSA 1978, communicate with a tribunal outside this state pursuant to Section 40-6A-317 NMSA 1978 and obtain discovery through a tribunal outside this state pursuant to Section 40-6A-318 NMSA 1978. In all other respects, Sections 40-6A-301 through 40-6A-616 NMSA 1978 do not apply and the tribunal shall apply the procedural and substantive law of this state. History: Laws 2005, ch. 166, § 11; 2011, ch. 159, § 13. ANNOTATIONSCompiler's notes. — Laws 2016, ch. 61, § 1 repealed Laws 2011, ch. 159, §§ 69 and 70, an applicability clause and contingent effective date, respectively, effective May 18, 2016, thereby making Laws 2011, ch. 159, §§ 1 through 68, effective May 18, 2016. For provisions of Laws 2011, ch. 159, §§ 69 and 70, see compiler's note to 40-6A-100 NMSA 1978. The 2011 amendment, effective May 18, 2016, narrowed the scope of the inapplicable sections to Sections 40-6A-301 through 40-6A-616 NMSA 1978.
NM Stat § 40-6A-211 (2021)
2021 New Mexico Statutes|Chapter 40 - Domestic Affairs|Article 6A - Uniform Interstate Family Support|Article 2 - JURISDICTION|Part C - RECONCILIATION WITH ORDERS OF OTHER STATES|Section 40-6A-211 - Continuing, exclusive jurisdiction to modify spousal-support order.

A. A tribunal of this state issuing a spousal-support order consistent with the law of this state has continuing, exclusive jurisdiction to modify the spousal-support order through the existence of the support obligation. B. A tribunal of this state may not modify a spousal-support order issued by a tribunal of another state or a foreign country having continuing, exclusive jurisdiction over that order pursuant to the law of that state or foreign country. C. A tribunal of this state that has continuing, exclusive jurisdiction over a spousal-support order may serve as: (1) an initiating tribunal to request a tribunal of another state to enforce the spousal-support order issued in this state; or (2) a responding tribunal to enforce or modify its own spousal-support order. History: Laws 2005, ch. 166, § 12; 2011, ch. 159, § 14. ANNOTATIONSCompiler's notes. — Laws 2016, ch. 61, § 1 repealed Laws 2011, ch. 159, §§ 69 and 70, an applicability clause and contingent effective date, respectively, effective May 18, 2016, thereby making Laws 2011, ch. 159, §§ 1 through 68, effective May 18, 2016. For provisions of Laws 2011, ch. 159, §§ 69 and 70, see compiler's note to 40-6A-100 NMSA 1978. The 2011 amendment, effective May 18, 2016, included tribunals of foreign countries within the scope of Subsection B. Collateral attack on foreign order of child support. — Where, in a neglect case, the New Mexico court ordered the father to reimburse the children, youth and families department for child support due for the time the child was in the custody of the department and dismissed the mother's claim for child support from the father and the mother then invoked the jurisdiction of the Texas court to establish child support from the father, the human services department was precluded from collaterally attacking the Texas order in the New Mexico neglect case and from relitigating the mother's claims of child support from the father. State ex rel. CYFD v. Andree G., 2007-NMCA-156, 143 N.M. 195, 174 P.3d 531.
NM Stat § 40-6A-601 (2021)
2021 New Mexico Statutes|Chapter 40 - Domestic Affairs|Article 6A - Uniform Interstate Family Support|Article 6 - ENFORCEMENT AND MODIFICATION OF SUPPORT ORDER AFTER REGISTRATION|Part A - REGISTRATION AND ENFORCEMENT OF SUPPORT ORDER|Section 40-6A-601 - Registration of order for enforcement.

A support order or income-withholding order issued in another state or a foreign support order may be registered in this state for enforcement. History: Laws 1994, ch. 107, § 601; 2005, ch. 166, § 35; 2011, ch. 159, § 38. ANNOTATIONSCompiler's notes. — Laws 2016, ch. 61, § 1 repealed Laws 2011, ch. 159, §§ 69 and 70, an applicability clause and contingent effective date, respectively, effective May 18, 2016, thereby making Laws 2011, ch. 159, §§ 1 through 68, effective May 18, 2016. For provisions of Laws 2011, ch. 159, §§ 69 and 70, see compiler's note to 40-6A-100 NMSA 1978. The 2011 amendment, effective May 18, 2016, included foreign support orders within the scope of this section. The 2005 amendment, effective June 17, 2005, deleted "an".