reglab/housing_qa huggingface dataset:
WA Rev Code § 10.66.110 (2021)
2021 Revised Code of Washington|Title 10 - Criminal Procedure|Chapter 10.66 - Drug Traffickers—Off-Limits Orders.|10.66.110 - Jurisdiction.

RCW 10.66.110 Jurisdiction.The superior courts shall have jurisdiction of all civil actions and all felony criminal proceedings brought under this chapter. Courts of limited jurisdiction shall have jurisdiction of all misdemeanor and gross misdemeanor criminal actions brought under this chapter.[ 1989 c 271 § 224.]
WA Rev Code § 10.66.120 (2021)
2021 Revised Code of Washington|Title 10 - Criminal Procedure|Chapter 10.66 - Drug Traffickers—Off-Limits Orders.|10.66.120 - Venue.

RCW 10.66.120 Venue.For the purposes of this chapter, an action may be brought in any county in which any element of the alleged drug trafficking activities occurred.[ 1989 c 271 § 225.]
WA Rev Code § 10.66.130 (2021)
2021 Revised Code of Washington|Title 10 - Criminal Procedure|Chapter 10.66 - Drug Traffickers—Off-Limits Orders.|10.66.130 - Modification of order—Notice to law enforcement agency.

RCW 10.66.130 Modification of order—Notice to law enforcement agency.Upon application, notice to all parties, and a hearing, the court may modify the terms of an off-limits order. When an order is terminated, modified, or amended before its expiration date, the clerk of the court shall forward, on or before the next judicial day, a true copy of the amended order to the law enforcement agency specified in the order. Upon receipt of an order, the law enforcement agency shall promptly enter it into an appropriate law enforcement information system.[ 1989 c 271 § 226.]
WA Rev Code § 10.70.010 (2021)
2021 Revised Code of Washington|Title 10 - Criminal Procedure|Chapter 10.70 - Commitments.|10.70.010 - Commitment until fine and costs are paid.

RCW 10.70.010 Commitment until fine and costs are paid.When the defendant is adjudged to pay a fine and costs, the court shall order him or her to be committed to the custody of the sheriff until the fine and costs are paid or secured as provided by law.[ 2010 c 8 § 1058; Code 1881 § 1119; 1873 p 242 § 277; 1854 p 123 § 141; RRS § 2200.]NOTES:Commitment for failure to pay fine and costs—Execution against defendant's property: RCW 10.82.030.Stay of execution for sixty days on recognizance: RCW 10.82.020, 10.82.025.
WA Rev Code § 10.70.020 (2021)
2021 Revised Code of Washington|Title 10 - Criminal Procedure|Chapter 10.70 - Commitments.|10.70.020 - Mittimus upon sentence to imprisonment.

RCW 10.70.020 Mittimus upon sentence to imprisonment.When any person shall be sentenced to be imprisoned in the penitentiary or county jail, the clerk of the court shall, as soon as may be, make out and deliver to the sheriff of the county, or his or her deputy, a transcript from the minutes of the court of such conviction and sentence, duly certified by such clerk, which shall be sufficient authority for such sheriff to execute the sentence, who shall execute it accordingly.[ 2010 c 8 § 1059; Code 1881 § 1126; 1873 p 243 § 284; 1854 p 124 § 148; RRS § 2207.]
WA Rev Code § 10.73.010 (2021)
2021 Revised Code of Washington|Title 10 - Criminal Procedure|Chapter 10.73 - Criminal Appeals.|10.73.010 - Appeal by defendant.

RCW 10.73.010 Appeal by defendant.Appeal by defendant, see Rules of Court.
WA Rev Code § 10.73.040 (2021)
2021 Revised Code of Washington|Title 10 - Criminal Procedure|Chapter 10.73 - Criminal Appeals.|10.73.040 - Bail pending appeal.

RCW 10.73.040 Bail pending appeal.In all criminal actions, except capital cases in which the proof of guilt is clear or the presumption great, upon an appeal being taken from a judgment of conviction, the court in which the judgment was rendered, or a judge thereof, must, by an order entered in the journal or filed with the clerk, fix and determine the amount of bail to be required of the appellant; and the appellant shall be committed until a bond to the state of Washington in the sum so fixed be executed on his or her behalf by at least two sureties possessing the qualifications required for sureties on appeal bonds, such bond to be conditioned that the appellant shall appear whenever required, and stand to and abide by the judgment or orders of the appellate court, and any judgment and order of the superior court that may be rendered or made in pursuance thereof. If the appellant be already at large on bail, his or her sureties shall be liable to the amount of their bond, in the same manner and upon the same conditions as if they had executed the bond prescribed by this section; but the court may by order require a new bond in a larger amount or with new sureties, and may commit the appellant until the order be complied with.[ 2010 c 8 § 1060; 1999 c 143 § 48; 1893 c 61 § 31; RRS § 1747.]
WA Rev Code § 10.73.090 (2021)
2021 Revised Code of Washington|Title 10 - Criminal Procedure|Chapter 10.73 - Criminal Appeals.|10.73.090 - Collateral attack—One year time limit.

RCW 10.73.090 Collateral attack—One year time limit.(1) No petition or motion for collateral attack on a judgment and sentence in a criminal case may be filed more than one year after the judgment becomes final if the judgment and sentence is valid on its face and was rendered by a court of competent jurisdiction.(2) For the purposes of this section, "collateral attack" means any form of postconviction relief other than a direct appeal. "Collateral attack" includes, but is not limited to, a personal restraint petition, a habeas corpus petition, a motion to vacate judgment, a motion to withdraw guilty plea, a motion for a new trial, and a motion to arrest judgment.(3) For the purposes of this section, a judgment becomes final on the last of the following dates:(a) The date it is filed with the clerk of the trial court;(b) The date that an appellate court issues its mandate disposing of a timely direct appeal from the conviction; or(c) The date that the United States Supreme Court denies a timely petition for certiorari to review a decision affirming the conviction on direct appeal. The filing of a motion to reconsider denial of certiorari does not prevent a judgment from becoming final.[ 1989 c 395 § 1.]
WA Rev Code § 10.73.100 (2021)
2021 Revised Code of Washington|Title 10 - Criminal Procedure|Chapter 10.73 - Criminal Appeals.|10.73.100 - Collateral attack—When one year limit not applicable.

RCW 10.73.100 Collateral attack—When one year limit not applicable.The time limit specified in RCW 10.73.090 does not apply to a petition or motion that is based solely on one or more of the following grounds:(1) Newly discovered evidence, if the defendant acted with reasonable diligence in discovering the evidence and filing the petition or motion;(2) The statute that the defendant was convicted of violating was unconstitutional on its face or as applied to the defendant's conduct;(3) The conviction was barred by double jeopardy under Amendment V of the United States Constitution or Article I, section 9 of the state Constitution;(4) The defendant pled not guilty and the evidence introduced at trial was insufficient to support the conviction;(5) The sentence imposed was in excess of the court's jurisdiction; or(6) There has been a significant change in the law, whether substantive or procedural, which is material to the conviction, sentence, or other order entered in a criminal or civil proceeding instituted by the state or local government, and either the legislature has expressly provided that the change in the law is to be applied retroactively, or a court, in interpreting a change in the law that lacks express legislative intent regarding retroactive application, determines that sufficient reasons exist to require retroactive application of the changed legal standard.[ 1989 c 395 § 2.]
WA Rev Code § 10.73.110 (2021)
2021 Revised Code of Washington|Title 10 - Criminal Procedure|Chapter 10.73 - Criminal Appeals.|10.73.110 - Collateral attack—One year time limit—Duty of court to advise defendant.

RCW 10.73.110 Collateral attack—One year time limit—Duty of court to advise defendant.At the time judgment and sentence is pronounced in a criminal case, the court shall advise the defendant of the time limit specified in RCW 10.73.090 and 10.73.100.[ 1989 c 395 § 4.]
WA Rev Code § 10.73.120 (2021)
2021 Revised Code of Washington|Title 10 - Criminal Procedure|Chapter 10.73 - Criminal Appeals.|10.73.120 - Collateral attack—One year time limit—Duty of department of corrections to advise.

RCW 10.73.120 Collateral attack—One year time limit—Duty of department of corrections to advise.As soon as practicable after July 23, 1989, the department of corrections shall attempt to advise the following persons of the time limit specified in RCW 10.73.090 and 10.73.100: Every person who, on July 23, 1989, is serving a term of incarceration, probation, parole, or community supervision pursuant to conviction of a felony.[ 1989 c 395 § 5.]
WA Rev Code § 10.73.130 (2021)
2021 Revised Code of Washington|Title 10 - Criminal Procedure|Chapter 10.73 - Criminal Appeals.|10.73.130 - Collateral attack—One year time limit—Applicability.

RCW 10.73.130 Collateral attack—One year time limit—Applicability.RCW 10.73.090 and 10.73.100 apply only to petitions and motions filed more than one year after July 23, 1989.[ 1989 c 395 § 6.]
WA Rev Code § 10.73.140 (2021)
2021 Revised Code of Washington|Title 10 - Criminal Procedure|Chapter 10.73 - Criminal Appeals.|10.73.140 - Collateral attack—Subsequent petitions.

RCW 10.73.140 Collateral attack—Subsequent petitions.If a person has previously filed a petition for personal restraint, the court of appeals will not consider the petition unless the person certifies that he or she has not filed a previous petition on similar grounds, and shows good cause why the petitioner did not raise the new grounds in the previous petition. Upon receipt of a personal restraint petition, the court of appeals shall review the petition and determine whether the person has previously filed a petition or petitions and if so, compare them. If upon review, the court of appeals finds that the petitioner has previously raised the same grounds for review, or that the petitioner has failed to show good cause why the ground was not raised earlier, the court of appeals shall dismiss the petition on its own motion without requiring the state to respond to the petition. Upon receipt of a first or subsequent petition, the court of appeals shall, whenever possible, review the petition and determine if the petition is based on frivolous grounds. If frivolous, the court of appeals shall dismiss the petition on its own motion without first requiring the state to respond to the petition.[ 1989 c 395 § 9.]
WA Rev Code § 10.73.150 (2021)
2021 Revised Code of Washington|Title 10 - Criminal Procedure|Chapter 10.73 - Criminal Appeals.|10.73.150 - Right to counsel.

RCW 10.73.150 Right to counsel.Counsel shall be provided at state expense to an adult offender convicted of a crime and to a juvenile offender convicted of an offense when the offender is indigent or indigent and able to contribute as those terms are defined in RCW 10.101.010 and the offender:(1) Files an appeal as a matter of right;(2) Responds to an appeal filed as a matter of right or responds to a motion for discretionary review or petition for review filed by the state;(3) Is under a sentence of death and requests counsel be appointed to file and prosecute a motion or petition for collateral attack as defined in RCW 10.73.090. Counsel may be provided at public expense to file or prosecute a second or subsequent collateral attack on the same judgment and sentence, if the court determines that the collateral attack is not barred by RCW 10.73.090 or 10.73.140;(4) Is not under a sentence of death and requests counsel to prosecute a collateral attack after the chief judge has determined that the issues raised by the petition are not frivolous, in accordance with the procedure contained in rules of appellate procedure 16.11. Counsel shall not be provided at public expense to file or prosecute a second or subsequent collateral attack on the same judgment and sentence;(5) Responds to a collateral attack filed by the state or responds to or prosecutes an appeal from a collateral attack that was filed by the state;(6) Prosecutes a motion or petition for review after the supreme court or court of appeals has accepted discretionary review of a decision of a court of limited jurisdiction; or(7) Prosecutes a motion or petition for review after the supreme court has accepted discretionary review of a court of appeals decision.[ 1995 c 275 § 2.]NOTES:Finding—1995 c 275: "The legislature is aware that the constitutional requirements of equal protection and due process require that counsel be provided for indigent persons and persons who are indigent and able to contribute for the first appeal as a matter of right from a judgment and sentence in a criminal case or a juvenile offender proceeding, and no further. There is no constitutional right to appointment of counsel at public expense to collaterally attack a judgment and sentence in a criminal case or juvenile offender proceeding or to seek discretionary review of a lower appellate court decision.The legislature finds that it is appropriate to extend the right to counsel at state expense beyond constitutional requirements in certain limited circumstances to persons who are indigent and persons who are indigent and able to contribute as those terms are defined in RCW 10.101.010." [ 1995 c 275 § 1.]Severability—1995 c 275: "If any provision of this act or its application to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the remainder of the act or the application of the provision to other persons or circumstances is not affected." [ 1995 c 275 § 5.]
WA Rev Code § 10.73.160 (2021)
2021 Revised Code of Washington|Title 10 - Criminal Procedure|Chapter 10.73 - Criminal Appeals.|10.73.160 - Court fees and costs.

RCW 10.73.160 Court fees and costs.(1) The court of appeals, supreme court, and superior courts may require an adult offender convicted of an offense to pay appellate costs.(2) Appellate costs are limited to expenses specifically incurred by the state in prosecuting or defending an appeal or collateral attack from a criminal conviction. Appellate costs shall not include expenditures to maintain and operate government agencies that must be made irrespective of specific violations of the law. Expenses incurred for producing a verbatim report of proceedings and clerk's papers may be included in costs the court may require a convicted defendant to pay.(3) Costs, including recoupment of fees for court-appointed counsel, shall be requested in accordance with the procedures contained in Title 14 of the rules of appellate procedure and in Title 9 of the rules for appeal of decisions of courts of limited jurisdiction. An award of costs shall become part of the trial court judgment and sentence.(4) A defendant who has been sentenced to pay costs and who is not in contumacious default in the payment may at any time after release from total confinement petition the court that sentenced the defendant or juvenile offender for remission of the payment of costs or of any unpaid portion. If it appears to the satisfaction of the sentencing court that payment of the amount due will impose manifest hardship on the defendant or the defendant's immediate family, the sentencing court may remit all or part of the amount due in costs, modify the method of payment under RCW 10.01.170, or convert the unpaid costs to community restitution hours, if the jurisdiction operates a community restitution program, at the rate of no less than the state minimum wage established in RCW 49.46.020 for each hour of community restitution. Manifest hardship exists where the defendant or juvenile offender is indigent as defined in RCW 10.101.010(3) (a) through (c).(5) The parents or another person legally obligated to support a juvenile offender who has been ordered to pay appellate costs and who is not in contumacious default in the payment may at any time petition the court that sentenced the juvenile offender for remission of the payment of costs or of any unpaid portion. If it appears to the satisfaction of the sentencing court that payment of the amount due will impose manifest hardship on the parents or another person legally obligated to support a juvenile offender or on their immediate families, the sentencing court may remit all or part of the amount due in costs, or may modify the method of payment.[ 2018 c 269 § 12; 2015 c 265 § 22; 1995 c 275 § 3.]NOTES:Construction—2018 c 269: See note following RCW 10.82.090.Finding—Intent—2015 c 265: See note following RCW 13.50.010.Finding—Severability—1995 c 275: See notes following RCW 10.73.150.
WA Rev Code § 10.77.020 (2021)
2021 Revised Code of Washington|Title 10 - Criminal Procedure|Chapter 10.77 - Criminally Insane—Procedures.|10.77.020 - Rights of person under this chapter.

RCW 10.77.020 Rights of person under this chapter.(1) At any and all stages of the proceedings pursuant to this chapter, any person subject to the provisions of this chapter shall be entitled to the assistance of counsel, and if the person is indigent the court shall appoint counsel to assist him or her. A person may waive his or her right to counsel; but such waiver shall only be effective if a court makes a specific finding that he or she is or was competent to so waive. In making such findings, the court shall be guided but not limited by the following standards: Whether the person attempting to waive the assistance of counsel, does so understanding:(a) The nature of the charges;(b) The statutory offense included within them;(c) The range of allowable punishments thereunder;(d) Possible defenses to the charges and circumstances in mitigation thereof; and(e) All other facts essential to a broad understanding of the whole matter.(2) Whenever any person is subjected to an examination pursuant to any provision of this chapter, he or she may retain an expert or professional person to perform an examination in his or her behalf. In the case of a person who is indigent, the court shall upon his or her request assist the person in obtaining an expert or professional person to perform an examination or participate in the hearing on his or her behalf. An expert or professional person obtained by an indigent person pursuant to the provisions of this chapter shall be compensated for his or her services out of funds of the department, in an amount determined by the secretary to be fair and reasonable.(3) Any time the defendant is being examined by court appointed experts or professional persons pursuant to the provisions of this chapter, the defendant shall be entitled to have his or her attorney present.(4) In a competency evaluation conducted under this chapter, the defendant may refuse to answer any question if he or she believes his or her answers may tend to incriminate him or her or form links leading to evidence of an incriminating nature.(5) In a sanity evaluation conducted under this chapter, if a defendant refuses to answer questions or to participate in an examination conducted in response to the defendant's assertion of an insanity defense, the court shall exclude from evidence at trial any testimony or evidence from any expert or professional person obtained or retained by the defendant.[ 2006 c 109 § 1; 1998 c 297 § 30; 1993 c 31 § 5; 1974 ex.s. c 198 § 2; 1973 1st ex.s. c 117 § 2.]NOTES:Application—2006 c 109: "This act applies to all examinations performed on or after June 7, 2006." [ 2006 c 109 § 2.]Severability—2006 c 109: "If any provision of this act or its application to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the remainder of the act or the application of the provision to other persons or circumstances is not affected." [ 2006 c 109 § 3.]Effective dates—Severability—Intent—1998 c 297: See notes following RCW 71.05.010.
WA Rev Code § 10.77.025 (2021)
2021 Revised Code of Washington|Title 10 - Criminal Procedure|Chapter 10.77 - Criminally Insane—Procedures.|10.77.025 - Maximum term of commitment or treatment.

RCW 10.77.025 Maximum term of commitment or treatment.(1) Whenever any person has been: (a) Committed to a correctional facility or inpatient treatment under any provision of this chapter; or (b) ordered to undergo alternative treatment following his or her acquittal by reason of insanity of a crime charged, such commitment or treatment cannot exceed the maximum possible penal sentence for any offense charged for which the person was committed, or was acquitted by reason of insanity.(2) Whenever any person committed under any provision of this chapter has not been released within seven days of the maximum possible penal sentence under subsection (1) of this section, and the professional person in charge of the facility believes that the person presents a likelihood of serious harm or is gravely disabled due to a mental disorder, the professional person shall, prior to the expiration of the maximum penal sentence, notify the appropriate designated crisis responder of the impending expiration and provide a copy of all relevant information regarding the person, including the likely release date and shall indicate why the person should not be released.(3) A designated crisis responder who receives notice and records under subsection (2) of this section shall, prior to the date of the expiration of the maximum sentence, determine whether to initiate proceedings under chapter 71.05 RCW.[ 2016 sp.s. c 29 § 406; 2000 c 94 § 13; 1998 c 297 § 31.]NOTES:Effective dates—2016 sp.s. c 29: See note following RCW 71.05.760.Short title—Right of action—2016 sp.s. c 29: See notes following RCW 71.05.010.Effective dates—Severability—Intent—1998 c 297: See notes following RCW 71.05.010.
WA Rev Code § 10.77.027 (2021)
2021 Revised Code of Washington|Title 10 - Criminal Procedure|Chapter 10.77 - Criminally Insane—Procedures.|10.77.027 - Eligible for commitment regardless of cause.

RCW 10.77.027 Eligible for commitment regardless of cause.When a designated crisis responder or a professional person has determined that a person has a mental disorder, and is otherwise committable, the cause of the person's mental disorder shall not make the person ineligible for commitment under chapter 71.05 RCW.[ 2016 sp.s. c 29 § 407; 2004 c 166 § 3.]NOTES:Effective dates—2016 sp.s. c 29: See note following RCW 71.05.760.Short title—Right of action—2016 sp.s. c 29: See notes following RCW 71.05.010.Severability—Effective dates—2004 c 166: See notes following RCW 71.05.040.
WA Rev Code § 10.77.030 (2021)
2021 Revised Code of Washington|Title 10 - Criminal Procedure|Chapter 10.77 - Criminally Insane—Procedures.|10.77.030 - Establishing insanity as a defense.

RCW 10.77.030 Establishing insanity as a defense.(1) Evidence of insanity is not admissible unless the defendant, at the time of arraignment or within ten days thereafter or at such later time as the court may for good cause permit, files a written notice of his or her intent to rely on such a defense.(2) Insanity is a defense which the defendant must establish by a preponderance of the evidence.(3) No condition of mind proximately induced by the voluntary act of a person charged with a crime shall constitute insanity.[ 1998 c 297 § 32; 1974 ex.s. c 198 § 3; 1973 1st ex.s. c 117 § 3.]NOTES:Effective dates—Severability—Intent—1998 c 297: See notes following RCW 71.05.010.