reglab/housing_qa huggingface dataset:
ID Code § 9-1403 (2021)
2021 Idaho Code|Title 9 - EVIDENCE|Chapter 14 - ADMINISTRATION OF OATHS AND AFFIRMATIONS|Section 9-1403 - PECULIAR FORMS OF OATHS.

9-1403. PECULIAR FORMS OF OATHS. Whenever the court before which a person is offered as a witness is satisfied that he has a peculiar mode of swearing, connected with, or in addition to, the usual form of administration, which, in his opinion, is more solemn or obligatory, the court may, in its discretion, adopt that mode.  History: [(9-1403) C.C.P. 1881, sec. 994; R.S., R.C., & C.L., sec. 6129; C.S., sec. 8066; I.C.A., sec. 16-1403.]
ID Code § 9-1404 (2021)
2021 Idaho Code|Title 9 - EVIDENCE|Chapter 14 - ADMINISTRATION OF OATHS AND AFFIRMATIONS|Section 9-1404 - PECULIAR FORMS OF OATH — RELIGIONS OTHER THAN CHRISTIAN.

9-1404. PECULIAR FORMS OF OATH — RELIGIONS OTHER THAN CHRISTIAN. When a person is sworn who believes in any other than the Christian religion, he may be sworn according to the peculiar ceremonies of his religion, if there be any such.  History: [(9-1404) C.C.P. 1881, sec. 995; R.S., R.C., & C.L., sec. 6130; C.S., sec. 8067; I.C.A., sec. 16-1404.]
ID Code § 9-1405 (2021)
2021 Idaho Code|Title 9 - EVIDENCE|Chapter 14 - ADMINISTRATION OF OATHS AND AFFIRMATIONS|Section 9-1405 - AFFIRMATION IN PLACE OF OATH.

9-1405. AFFIRMATION IN PLACE OF OATH. Any person who desires it, may, at his option, instead of taking an oath, make his solemn affirmation or declaration, by assenting when addressed, in the following form: "You do solemnly affirm (or declare), that," etc., as above provided.  History: [(9-1405) C.C.P. 1881, sec. 996; R.S., R.C., & C.L., sec. 6131; C.S., sec. 8068; I.C.A., sec. 16-1405.]
ID Code § 9-1406 (2021)
2021 Idaho Code|Title 9 - EVIDENCE|Chapter 14 - ADMINISTRATION OF OATHS AND AFFIRMATIONS|Section 9-1406 - CERTIFICATION OR DECLARATION UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY.

9-1406. CERTIFICATION OR DECLARATION UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY. (1) Whenever, under any law of this state or under any rule, regulation, order or requirement made pursuant to a law of this state, any matter is required or permitted to be supported, evidenced, established or proved by the sworn statement, declaration, verification, certificate, oath, affirmation or affidavit, in writing, of the person making the same, other than a deposition, an oath of office or an oath required to be taken before a specified official other than a notary public, such matter may with like force and effect be supported, evidenced, established or proven by the unsworn certification or declaration, in writing, which is subscribed by such person and is in substantially the following form:  "I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury pursuant to the law of the State of Idaho that the foregoing is true and correct."       ………………..     ………………..     (Date)     (Signature)       (2) This section shall not apply to acknowledgments.  History: [9-1406, added 2013, ch. 259, sec. 1, p. 636.]
ID Code § 9-1501 (2021)
2021 Idaho Code|Title 9 - EVIDENCE|Chapter 15 - TENDER AND RECEIPT|Section 9-1501 - WRITTEN OFFER EQUIVALENT TO TENDER.

9-1501. WRITTEN OFFER EQUIVALENT TO TENDER. An offer in writing to pay a particular sum of money, or to deliver a written instrument or specific personal property, is, if not accepted, equivalent to the actual production and tender of the money, instrument or property.  History: [(9-1501) C.C.P. 1881, sec. 983; R.S., R.C., & C.L., sec. 6110; C.S., sec. 8049; I.C.A., sec. 16-1501.]
ID Code § 9-1502 (2021)
2021 Idaho Code|Title 9 - EVIDENCE|Chapter 15 - TENDER AND RECEIPT|Section 9-1502 - DEBTOR MAY DEMAND RECEIPT.

9-1502. DEBTOR MAY DEMAND RECEIPT. Whoever pays money, or delivers an instrument or property, is entitled to a receipt therefor from the person to whom the payment or delivery is made, and may demand a proper signature to such receipt as a condition of the payment or delivery.  History: [(9-1502) C.C.P. 1881, sec. 984; R.S., R.C., & C.L., sec. 6111; C.S., sec. 8050; I.C.A., sec. 16-1502.]
ID Code § 9-1601 (2021)
2021 Idaho Code|Title 9 - EVIDENCE|Chapter 16 - FEES AND MILEAGE OF WITNESSES|Section 9-1601 - WITNESSES’ FEES IN DISTRICT COURT.

9-1601. WITNESSES’ FEES IN DISTRICT COURT. Witnesses in civil actions in district court or magistrates division thereof, or before any referee, master or commissioner thereof, are entitled to receive such witness fees and travel expenses as determined by the trial court pursuant to the Idaho Rules of Civil Procedure.  History: [(9-1601) R.S., R.C., & C.L., sec. 6139; C.S., sec. 8069; I.C.A., sec. 16-1601; am. 1957, ch. 140, sec. 1, p. 232; am. 1977, ch. 5, sec. 1, p. 10.]
ID Code § 9-1603 (2021)
2021 Idaho Code|Title 9 - EVIDENCE|Chapter 16 - FEES AND MILEAGE OF WITNESSES|Section 9-1603 - INTERPRETERS’ FEES.

9-1603. INTERPRETERS’ FEES. The interpreters are entitled to receive such fee for their services as set and determined by the court together with the same rate per mile as the state of Idaho pays for state employees pursuant to section 67-2008, Idaho Code, to be paid out of the county treasury by order of the court in both civil and criminal actions.  History: [(9-1603) R.S., R.C., & C.L., sec. 6141; C.S., sec. 8071; I.C.A., sec. 16-1603; am. 1959, ch. 65, sec. 1, p. 137; am. 1975, ch. 64, sec. 3, p. 130; am. 1982, ch. 213, sec. 2, p. 587.]
ID Code § 9-1604 (2021)
2021 Idaho Code|Title 9 - EVIDENCE|Chapter 16 - FEES AND MILEAGE OF WITNESSES|Section 9-1604 - ATTORNEYS NOT ENTITLED TO WITNESS’ FEES.

9-1604. ATTORNEYS NOT ENTITLED TO WITNESS’ FEES. No counselor or attorney at law in any case shall be allowed any fees for attendance as a witness in any such cause.  History: [(9-1604) R.S., R.C., & C.L., sec. 6142; C.S., sec. 8072; I.C.A., sec. 16-1604.]
ID Code § 9-1605 (2021)
2021 Idaho Code|Title 9 - EVIDENCE|Chapter 16 - FEES AND MILEAGE OF WITNESSES|Section 9-1605 - STATE NEED NOT PREPAY FEES.

9-1605. STATE NEED NOT PREPAY FEES. The attorney-general or any prosecuting attorney is authorized to cause subpoenas to be issued, and to compel the attendance of witnesses on behalf of the state, without paying or tendering fees in advance to any witnesses; and any witness failing or neglecting to attend after being served with a subpoena, may be proceeded against and shall be liable in the same manner as provided by law in other cases when fees have been tendered or paid.  History: [(9-1605) R.S., R.C., & C.L., sec. 6143; C.S., sec. 8073; I.C.A., sec. 16-1605.]
ID Code § 9-1701 (2021)
2021 Idaho Code|Title 9 - EVIDENCE|Chapter 17 - PROOF OF FACTS CONTAINED IN PUBLIC RECORDS|Section 9-1701 - LICENSURE OR NONLICENSURE.

9-1701. LICENSURE OR NONLICENSURE. (1) The existence or nonexistence of licensure by any public authority in this state, the United States, or any state of the United States may be proved, prima facie, in any criminal or civil action, by the affidavit of the custodian of the records of the licensing authority, or one acting with the authorization of the custodian, stating that the conclusion given was based on a diligent search of the records, and accompanied by a certificate that such person has the custody. (2) In cases where public licensing functions performed by more than one licensing authority in this state relate to the same subject matter, the bureau of occupational licenses may, by regulation, designate a single custodian to maintain a master list of licensees, and the affidavit of such person, or one acting with his authority, may be used as evidence in the manner and with the effect set forth in subsection (1) of this section. (3) This section does not prevent the proof of official records or of entry or lack of entry therein by any method authorized by any applicable statute, rule of criminal or civil procedure or rule of evidence recognized by the courts of this state.  History: [9-1701, added 1979, ch. 131, sec. 4, p. 425.]
ID Code § 9-1702 (2021)
2021 Idaho Code|Title 9 - EVIDENCE|Chapter 17 - PROOF OF FACTS CONTAINED IN PUBLIC RECORDS|Section 9-1702 - PROOF OF PRESCRIPTION DRUG STATUS.

9-1702. PROOF OF PRESCRIPTION DRUG STATUS. Proof that a drug is a prescription or legend drug may be made as provided by section 54-1738, Idaho Code.  History: [9-1702, added 1979, ch. 131, sec. 4, p. 426.]
ID Code § 9-1801 (2021)
2021 Idaho Code|Title 9 - EVIDENCE|Chapter 18 - UNIFORM CHILD WITNESS TESTIMONY BY ALTERNATIVE METHODS ACT|Section 9-1801 - SHORT TITLE.

9-1801. SHORT TITLE. This chapter may be cited as the "Uniform Child Witness Testimony by Alternative Methods Act."  History: [9-1801, added 2003, ch. 152, sec. 2, p. 438.]
ID Code § 9-1802 (2021)
2021 Idaho Code|Title 9 - EVIDENCE|Chapter 18 - UNIFORM CHILD WITNESS TESTIMONY BY ALTERNATIVE METHODS ACT|Section 9-1802 - DEFINITIONS.

9-1802. DEFINITIONS. In this chapter: (1) "Alternative method" means a method by which a child witness testifies which does not include all of the following: (a) Having the child present in person in an open forum; (b) Having the child testify in the presence and full view of the finder of fact and presiding officer; and (c) Allowing all of the parties to be present, to participate and to view and be viewed by the child. (2) "Child witness" means an individual under the age of thirteen (13) years who has been or will be called to testify in a proceeding. (3) "Criminal proceeding" means a trial or hearing before a court in a prosecution of a person charged with violating a criminal law of this state and a juvenile delinquency proceeding involving conduct that if engaged in by an adult would constitute a violation of the criminal law of this state. (4) "Noncriminal proceeding" means a trial or hearing before a court or an administrative agency of this state having judicial or quasi-judicial powers, other than a criminal proceeding.  History: [9-1802, added 2003, ch. 152, sec. 2, p. 438.]
ID Code § 9-1803 (2021)
2021 Idaho Code|Title 9 - EVIDENCE|Chapter 18 - UNIFORM CHILD WITNESS TESTIMONY BY ALTERNATIVE METHODS ACT|Section 9-1803 - APPLICABILITY.

9-1803. APPLICABILITY. This chapter applies to the testimony of child witnesses in all criminal or noncriminal proceedings. However, this chapter does not preclude, in a noncriminal proceeding, any other procedure permitted by law for a child witness to testify, or in a juvenile courtroom proceeding involving conduct that if engaged in by an adult would constitute a violation of a criminal law of this state, testimony by a child witness in a closed forum as may be authorized or required by law.  History: [9-1803, added 2003, ch. 152, sec. 2, p. 438.]
ID Code § 9-1804 (2021)
2021 Idaho Code|Title 9 - EVIDENCE|Chapter 18 - UNIFORM CHILD WITNESS TESTIMONY BY ALTERNATIVE METHODS ACT|Section 9-1804 - HEARING WHETHER TO ALLOW TESTIMONY BY ALTERNATIVE METHOD.

9-1804. HEARING WHETHER TO ALLOW TESTIMONY BY ALTERNATIVE METHOD. (1) The presiding officer of a criminal or noncriminal proceeding may order a hearing to determine whether to allow presentation of the testimony of a child witness by an alternative method. The presiding officer, for good cause shown, shall order the hearing upon motion of a party, a child witness, or an individual determined by the presiding officer to have sufficient standing to act on behalf of the child. (2) A hearing to determine whether to allow presentation of the testimony of a child witness by an alternative method must be conducted on the record after reasonable notice to all parties, any nonparty movant, and any other person the presiding officer specifies. The child’s presence is not required at the hearing unless ordered by the presiding officer. In conducting the hearing, the presiding officer is not bound by rules of evidence, except for the rules of privilege.  History: [9-1804, added 2003, ch. 152, sec. 2, p. 438.]
ID Code § 9-1805 (2021)
2021 Idaho Code|Title 9 - EVIDENCE|Chapter 18 - UNIFORM CHILD WITNESS TESTIMONY BY ALTERNATIVE METHODS ACT|Section 9-1805 - STANDARDS FOR DETERMINING WHETHER CHILD WITNESS’ TESTIMONY MAY BE PRESENTED BY ALTERNATIVE METHOD.

9-1805. STANDARDS FOR DETERMINING WHETHER CHILD WITNESS’ TESTIMONY MAY BE PRESENTED BY ALTERNATIVE METHOD. (1) In a criminal proceeding, the presiding officer may order the presentation of the testimony of a child witness by an alternative method only in the following situations: (a) A child witness’ testimony may be taken otherwise than in an open forum in the presence and full view of the finder of fact if the presiding officer finds by clear and convincing evidence that the child would suffer serious emotional trauma that would substantially impair the child’s ability to communicate with the finder of fact if required to testify in the open forum. (b) A child witness’ testimony may be taken other than in a face-to-face confrontation between the child and a defendant if the presiding officer finds by clear and convincing evidence that the child would suffer serious emotional trauma that would substantially impair the child’s ability to communicate with the finder of fact if required to be confronted face-to-face by the defendant. (2) In a noncriminal proceeding, the presiding officer may order the presentation of the testimony of a child witness by an alternative method if the presiding officer finds by a preponderance of the evidence that presenting the testimony of the child by an alternative method is necessary to serve the best interests of the child or enable the child to communicate with the finder of fact. In making this finding, the presiding officer shall consider: (a) The nature of the proceeding; (b) The age and maturity of the child; (c) The relationship of the child to the parties in the proceeding; (d) The nature and degree of emotional trauma that the child may suffer in testifying; and (e) Any other relevant factor.  History: [9-1805, added 2003, ch. 152, sec. 2, p. 438.]
ID Code § 9-1806 (2021)
2021 Idaho Code|Title 9 - EVIDENCE|Chapter 18 - UNIFORM CHILD WITNESS TESTIMONY BY ALTERNATIVE METHODS ACT|Section 9-1806 - FACTORS FOR DETERMINING WHETHER TO PERMIT ALTERNATIVE METHOD.

9-1806. FACTORS FOR DETERMINING WHETHER TO PERMIT ALTERNATIVE METHOD. If the presiding officer determines that a standard under section 9-1805, Idaho Code, has been met, the presiding officer shall determine whether to allow the presentation of the testimony of a child witness by an alternative method and in doing so shall consider: (1) Alternative methods reasonably available; (2) Available means for protecting the interests of or reducing emotional trauma to the child without resort to an alternative method; (3) The nature of the case; (4) The relative rights of the parties; (5) The importance of the proposed testimony of the child; (6) The nature and degree of emotional trauma that the child may suffer if an alternative method is not used; and (7) Any other relevant factor.  History: [9-1806, added 2003, ch. 152, sec. 2, p. 439.]
ID Code § 9-1807 (2021)
2021 Idaho Code|Title 9 - EVIDENCE|Chapter 18 - UNIFORM CHILD WITNESS TESTIMONY BY ALTERNATIVE METHODS ACT|Section 9-1807 - ORDER REGARDING TESTIMONY BY ALTERNATIVE METHOD.

9-1807. ORDER REGARDING TESTIMONY BY ALTERNATIVE METHOD. (1) An order allowing or disallowing the presentation of the testimony of a child witness by an alternative method must state the findings of fact and conclusions of law that support the presiding officer’s determination. (2) An order allowing the presentation of the testimony of a child witness by an alternative method must state: (a) The method by which the testimony is to be presented; (b) A list, individually or by category, of the persons either allowed to be present or required to be excluded during the taking of the testimony of the child; (c) Any special conditions necessary to facilitate a party’s right to examine or cross-examine the child; (d) Any condition or limitation upon the participation of persons present during the taking of the testimony of the child; and (e) Any other condition necessary for taking or presenting the testimony. (3) The alternative method ordered by the presiding officer must be no more restrictive of the rights of the parties than is necessary under the circumstances to serve the purposes of the order.  History: [9-1807, added 2003, ch. 152, sec. 2, p. 439.]
ID Code § 9-1808 (2021)
2021 Idaho Code|Title 9 - EVIDENCE|Chapter 18 - UNIFORM CHILD WITNESS TESTIMONY BY ALTERNATIVE METHODS ACT|Section 9-1808 - RIGHT OF PARTIES TO EXAMINE CHILD WITNESS.

9-1808. RIGHT OF PARTIES TO EXAMINE CHILD WITNESS. An alternative method ordered by the presiding officer must permit a full and fair opportunity for examination and cross-examination of the child witness.  History: [9-1808, added 2003, ch. 152, sec. 2, p. 440.]
ID Code § 10-111 (2021)
2021 Idaho Code|Title 10 - ISSUES, TRIAL AND JUDGMENT IN CIVIL ACTIONS|Chapter 1 - ISSUES — MODES OF TRIAL — POSTPONEMENT|Section 10-111 - AMOUNT SOUGHT FOR DAMAGES NOT DISCLOSED TO JURY.

10-111. AMOUNT SOUGHT FOR DAMAGES NOT DISCLOSED TO JURY. In any civil action for damages, the amount of general damages sued for shall not be disclosed to the jury by court, counsel or any party and it shall be grounds for mistrial for any person to violate the prohibition of this act whether by specific statements or generalized argument. In furtherance of the provisions of this act it is declared that it is the exclusive province of the jury in a civil action for money damages involving allegations of general damages to resolve such issues of fact and it is against the policy of the state of Idaho for the jurors required to make such determinations to be informed of the particulars of allegations of damages in the pleadings on file with the court, by the arguments of counsel or otherwise, the dollar amount appraisal or evaluation of such damages being the exclusive province of the trier of fact; provided, this act shall not be construed to prohibit proof of damages or presentation of arguments which are legally relevant and proper in view of the record and issues before the court in any action for money damages.  History: [I.C. sec. 10-111, as added by 1976, ch. 275, sec. 1, p. 949.]
ID Code § 10-1106 (2021)
2021 Idaho Code|Title 10 - ISSUES, TRIAL AND JUDGMENT IN CIVIL ACTIONS|Chapter 11 - MANNER OF GIVING AND ENTERING JUDGMENT — LIEN AND SATISFACTION|Section 10-1106 - DEATH AFTER VERDICT — ENTRY AND EFFECT OF JUDGMENT.

10-1106. DEATH AFTER VERDICT — ENTRY AND EFFECT OF JUDGMENT. If a party die after a verdict or decision upon any issue of fact, and before judgment, the court may nevertheless render judgment thereon. Such judgment is not a lien on the real property of the deceased party, but is payable in the course of administration on his estate.  History: [(10-1106) C.C.P. 1881, sec. 423; R.S., R.C., & C.L., sec. 4455; C.S., sec. 6900; I.C.A., sec. 7-1106.]
ID Code § 10-1110 (2021)
2021 Idaho Code|Title 10 - ISSUES, TRIAL AND JUDGMENT IN CIVIL ACTIONS|Chapter 11 - MANNER OF GIVING AND ENTERING JUDGMENT — LIEN AND SATISFACTION|Section 10-1110 - FILING TRANSCRIPT OF JUDGMENTS — LIEN ACQUIRED.

10-1110. FILING TRANSCRIPT OF JUDGMENTS — LIEN ACQUIRED. A transcript or abstract of any judgment or decree of any court of this state or any court of the United States the enforcement of which has not been stayed as provided by law, if rendered within this state, certified by the clerk having custody thereof, may be recorded with the recorder of any county of this state, who shall immediately record and docket the same as by law provided, and from the time of such recording, and not before, the judgment so recorded becomes a lien upon all real property of the judgment debtor in the county, not exempt from execution, owned by him at the time or acquired afterwards at any time prior to the expiration of the lien; provided that where a transcript or abstract is recorded of any judgment or decree of divorce or separate maintenance making provision for installment or periodic payment of sums for maintenance of children or alimony or allowance for wife’s support, such judgment or decree shall be a lien only in an amount for payments so provided, delinquent or not made when due. The lien resulting from recording of a judgment other than for support of a child or for restitution owed to a crime victim where the order of restitution has been recorded as a judgment pursuant to section 19-5305, Idaho Code, continues ten (10) years from the date of the judgment, unless the judgment be previously satisfied, or unless the enforcement of the judgment be stayed upon an appeal as provided by law. A lien arising from the delinquency of a payment due under a judgment for support of a child issued by an Idaho court continues until ten (10) years after the death or emancipation of the last child for whom support is owed under the judgment unless the underlying judgment is renewed, is previously satisfied or the enforcement of the judgment is stayed upon an appeal as provided by law. A lien arising from an order for restitution to a crime victim where the order of restitution has been recorded as a judgment pursuant to section 19-5305, Idaho Code, continues until twenty (20) years from the date of the judgment, unless the judgment be previously satisfied, or unless the judgment is stayed or set aside. The transcript or abstract above mentioned shall contain the title of the court and cause and number of action, names of judgment creditors and debtors, time of entry and amount of judgment.  History: [(10-1110) C.S., sec. 6902B, added 1929, ch. 51, sec. 3, p. 70; I.C.A., sec. 7-1110; am. 1955, ch. 45, sec. 1, p. 63; am. 1963, ch. 209, sec. 1, p. 598; am. 1995, ch. 264, sec. 2, p. 847; am. 1998, ch. 68, sec. 1, p. 261; am. 2011, ch. 104, sec. 2, p. 267; am. 2015, ch. 139, sec. 1, p. 343; am. 2015, ch. 278, sec. 4, p. 1138.]
ID Code § 10-1111 (2021)
2021 Idaho Code|Title 10 - ISSUES, TRIAL AND JUDGMENT IN CIVIL ACTIONS|Chapter 11 - MANNER OF GIVING AND ENTERING JUDGMENT — LIEN AND SATISFACTION|Section 10-1111 - ORDERS RENEWING JUDGMENT — LIEN.

10-1111. ORDERS RENEWING JUDGMENT — LIEN. (1) Unless the judgment has been satisfied, at any time prior to the expiration of the lien created by section 10-1110, Idaho Code, or any renewal thereof, the court that entered the judgment, other than a judgment for child support, may, upon motion, renew such judgment by entry of an order renewing judgment. The order renewing judgment may be recorded in the same manner as the original judgment, and the lien established or continued thereby shall continue for ten (10) years from the date of the order renewing judgment. Entry of an order renewing judgment maintains both the date of the original judgment and the priority of collection thereof, and it begins anew the time limitation for an action upon a judgment set forth in section 5-215, Idaho Code. (2) Unless the judgment has been satisfied, and prior to the expiration of the lien created in section 10-1110, Idaho Code, or any renewal thereof, a court that has entered a judgment for child support may, upon motion, renew such judgment by entry of an order renewing judgment. The entry of an order renewing judgment shall not affect the manner of enforcement of the original judgment, and the lien established or continued thereby shall continue for ten (10) years from the date of the order renewing judgment. Entry of an order renewing judgment maintains both the date of the original judgment and the priority of collection thereof, and it begins anew the time limitation for an action upon a judgment set forth in section 5-215, Idaho Code.  History: [10-1111, added 1978, ch. 115, sec. 1, p. 266; am. 1995, ch. 264, sec. 3, p. 847; am. 2011, ch. 104, sec. 3, p. 268; am. 2016, ch. 269, sec. 1, p. 724; am. 2017, ch. 177, sec. 1, p. 407; am. 2018, ch. 284, sec. 1, p. 672.]