CO Code § 4-9-604 (2021)
2021 Colorado Code|Title 4 - Uniform Commercial Code|Article 9 - Secured Transactions|Part 6 - Default|§ 4-9-604. Procedure if Security Agreement Covers Real Property or Fixtures

  If a security agreement covers both personal and real property, a secured party may proceed:   Under this part 6 as to the personal property without prejudicing any rights with respect to the real property; or    As to both the personal property and the real property in accordance with the rights with respect to the real property, in which case the other provisions of this part 6 do not apply.       Subject to subsection (c) of this section, if a security agreement covers goods that are or become fixtures, a secured party may proceed:   Under this part 6; or    In accordance with the rights with respect to real property, in which case the other provisions of this part 6 do not apply.       Subject to the other provisions of this part 6, if a secured party holding a security interest in fixtures has priority over all owners and encumbrancers of the real property, the secured party, after default, may remove the collateral from the real property.    A secured party that removes collateral shall promptly reimburse any encumbrancer or owner of the real property for the cost of repair of any physical injury caused by the removal. The secured party need not reimburse the encumbrancer or owner for any diminution in value of the real property caused by the absence of the goods removed or by any necessity of replacing them. A person entitled to reimbursement may refuse permission to remove until the secured party gives adequate assurance for the performance of the obligation to reimburse.     History. Source: L. 2001: Entire article R&RE, p. 1400, § 1, effective July 1.    Editor's note:    The provisions of this section are similar to former §§ 4-9-313 (8) and 4-9-501 (4) as they existed prior to 2001.    Colorado legislative change: Colorado did not adopt the phrase “other than the debtor” after the word “property” in the first sentence in subsection (d).     OFFICIAL COMMENT   1. Source. Former Sections 9-501(4), 9-313(8).   2. Real-Property-Related Collateral. The collateral in many transactions consists of both real and personal property. In the interest of simplicity, speed, and economy, subsection (a), like former Section 9-501(4), permits (but does not require) the secured party to proceed as to both real and personal property in accordance with its rights and remedies with respect to the real property. Subsection (a) also makes clear that a secured party who exercises rights under Part 6 with respect to personal property does not prejudice any rights under real-property law.   This Article does not address certain other real-property-related problems. In a number of States, the exercise of remedies by a creditor who is secured by both real property and non-real property collateral is governed by special legal rules. For example, under some anti-deficiency laws, creditors risk loss of rights against personal property collateral if they err in enforcing their rights against the real property. Under a “one-form-of-action” rule (or rule against splitting a cause of action), a creditor who judicially enforces a real property mortgage and does not proceed in the same action to enforce a security interest in personalty may (among other consequences) lose the right to proceed against the personalty. Although statutes of this kind create impediments to enforcement of security interests, this Article does not override these limitations under other law.   3. Fixtures. Subsection (b) is new. It makes clear that a security interest in fixtures may be enforced either under real-property law or under any of the applicable provisions of Part 6, including sale or other disposition either before or after removal of the fixtures (see subsection (c)). Subsection (b) also serves to overrule cases holding that a secured party's only remedy after default is the removal of the fixtures from the real property. See, e.g., Maplewood Bank Trust v. Sears, Roebuck Co., 625 A.2d 537 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1993).   Subsection (c) generally follows former Section 9-313(8). It gives the secured party the right to remove fixtures under certain circumstances. A secured party whose security interest in fixtures has priority over owners and encumbrancers of the real property may remove the collateral from the real property. However, subsection (d) requires the secured party to reimburse any owner (other than the debtor) or encumbrancer for the cost of repairing any physical injury caused by the removal. This right to reimbursement is implemented by the last sentence of subsection (d), which gives the owner or encumbrancer a right to security or indemnity as a condition for giving permission to remove.   ANNOTATION   Law reviews. For article, “Secured Transactions — Part I: Attachment, Perfection and Priorities”, see 11 Colo. Law. 2939 .