reglab/housing_qa huggingface dataset:
MI Comp L § 333.1061a (2021)
2021 Michigan Compiled Laws|Chapter 333 - Health|Act 193 of 1996 - Michigan Do-Not-Resuscitate Procedure Act (333.1051 - 333.1067)|Section 333.1061a - Compliance With Most Recent Order or Form; "Post Form" Defined.

333.1061a Compliance with most recent order or form; "POST form" defined.Sec. 11a.  (1) If a health professional described in section 11 has actual notice of a do-not-resuscitate order and is aware of the existence of a validly executed POST form under part 56B of the public health code, MCL 333.5671 to 333.5685, that contains a medical order regarding the initiation of resuscitation if the individual suffers cessation of both spontaneous respiration and circulation, the health professional shall comply with the most recent order or form.  (2) As used in this section, "POST form" means that term as defined in section 5674 of the public health code, MCL 333.5674. History: Add. 2017, Act 157, Eff. Feb. 6, 2018
MI Comp L § 333.1062 (2021)
2021 Michigan Compiled Laws|Chapter 333 - Health|Act 193 of 1996 - Michigan Do-Not-Resuscitate Procedure Act (333.1051 - 333.1067)|Section 333.1062 - Immunity From Civil or Criminal Liability.

333.1062 Immunity from civil or criminal liability. Sec. 12.  A person or organization is not subject to civil or criminal liability for withholding resuscitative procedures from a declarant in accordance with this act. History: 1996, Act 193, Eff. Aug. 1, 1996
MI Comp L § 333.1063 (2021)
2021 Michigan Compiled Laws|Chapter 333 - Health|Act 193 of 1996 - Michigan Do-Not-Resuscitate Procedure Act (333.1051 - 333.1067)|Section 333.1063 - Immunity From Civil or Criminal Liability; Conditions.

333.1063 Immunity from civil or criminal liability; conditions.  Sec. 13.  A person or organization is not subject to civil or criminal liability for either of the following:   (a) Attempting to resuscitate an individual who has executed a do-not-resuscitate order or on whose behalf an order has been executed, if the person or organization has no actual notice of the order.  (b) Failing to resuscitate an individual who has revoked a do-not-resuscitate order or on whose behalf a do-not-resuscitate order has been revoked, if the person or organization does not receive actual notice of the revocation.  History: 1996, Act 193, Eff. Aug. 1, 1996
MI Comp L § 333.1064 (2021)
2021 Michigan Compiled Laws|Chapter 333 - Health|Act 193 of 1996 - Michigan Do-Not-Resuscitate Procedure Act (333.1051 - 333.1067)|Section 333.1064 - Requirement to Execute Order Prohibited.

333.1064 Requirement to execute order prohibited.Sec. 14.  A person or organization shall not require the execution of an order as a condition for insurance coverage, admittance to a health care facility, receiving health care benefits or services, or any other reason. History: 1996, Act 193, Eff. Aug. 1, 1996 ;-- Am. 2013, Act 155, Eff. Feb. 4, 2014
MI Comp L § 333.1065 (2021)
2021 Michigan Compiled Laws|Chapter 333 - Health|Act 193 of 1996 - Michigan Do-Not-Resuscitate Procedure Act (333.1051 - 333.1067)|Section 333.1065 - Life Insurer; Prohibited Acts.

333.1065 Life insurer; prohibited acts. Sec. 15.  A life insurer shall not do any of the following because of the execution or implementation of an order:  (a) Refuse to provide or continue coverage to the declarant.  (b) Charge the declarant a higher premium.  (c) Offer a declarant different policy terms because the declarant has executed an order.   (d) Consider the terms of an existing policy of life insurance to have been breached or modified.  (e) Invoke a suicide or intentional death exemption or exclusion in a policy covering the declarant. History: 1996, Act 193, Eff. Aug. 1, 1996
MI Comp L § 333.1066 (2021)
2021 Michigan Compiled Laws|Chapter 333 - Health|Act 193 of 1996 - Michigan Do-Not-Resuscitate Procedure Act (333.1051 - 333.1067)|Section 333.1066 - Legal Rights Not Impaired or Superseded; Presumptions.

333.1066 Legal rights not impaired or superseded; presumptions.  Sec. 16.  (1) The provisions of this act are cumulative and do not impair or supersede a legal right that an individual may have to consent to or refuse medical treatment for himself or herself or that a parent, guardian, or other individual may have to consent to or refuse medical treatment on behalf of another.  (2) This act does not create a presumption concerning the intent of a person executing an order to consent to or refuse medical treatment in circumstances other than the cessation of both spontaneous circulation and respiration.   (3) This act does not create a presumption concerning the intent of an individual who has not executed an order to consent to or refuse any type of medical treatment.  History: 1996, Act 193, Eff. Aug. 1, 1996
MI Comp L § 333.1067 (2021)
2021 Michigan Compiled Laws|Chapter 333 - Health|Act 193 of 1996 - Michigan Do-Not-Resuscitate Procedure Act (333.1051 - 333.1067)|Section 333.1067 - Effective Date.

333.1067 Effective date. Sec. 17.  This act shall take effect August 1, 1996. History: 1996, Act 193, Eff. Aug. 1, 1996
MI Comp L § 333.1071 (2021)
2021 Michigan Compiled Laws|Chapter 333 - Health|Act 687 of 2002 - Born Alive Infant Protection Act (333.1071 - 333.1073)|Section 333.1071 - Short Title; Definitions.

333.1071 Short title; definitions. Sec. 1.  (1) This act shall be known and may be cited as the "born alive infant protection act".  (2) As used in this act:  (a) "Abortion" means that term as defined in section 17015 of the public health code, 1978 PA 368, MCL 333.17015.  (b) "Live birth" means the complete expulsion or extraction of a product of conception from its mother, regardless of the duration of the pregnancy, that after expulsion or extraction, whether or not the umbilical cord has been cut or the placenta is attached, shows any evidence of life, including, but not limited to, 1 or more of the following:  (i) Breathing.  (ii) A heartbeat.  (iii) Umbilical cord pulsation.  (iv) Definite movement of voluntary muscles. History: 2002, Act 687, Eff. Mar. 31, 2003
MI Comp L § 333.1072 (2021)
2021 Michigan Compiled Laws|Chapter 333 - Health|Act 687 of 2002 - Born Alive Infant Protection Act (333.1071 - 333.1073)|Section 333.1072 - Legislative Findings.

333.1072 Legislative findings. Sec. 2.  The legislature finds all of the following:  (a) The state has a paramount interest in protecting all individuals.  (b) If an abortion results in the live birth of a newborn, the newborn is a legal person for all purposes under the law.  (c) A woman's right to terminate pregnancy ends when the pregnancy is terminated. It is not an infringement on a woman's right to terminate her pregnancy for the state to assert its interest in protecting a newborn whose live birth occurs as the result of an abortion. History: 2002, Act 687, Eff. Mar. 31, 2003
MI Comp L § 333.1073 (2021)
2021 Michigan Compiled Laws|Chapter 333 - Health|Act 687 of 2002 - Born Alive Infant Protection Act (333.1071 - 333.1073)|Section 333.1073 - Abortion Resulting in Live Birth; Surrender of Newborn to Emergency Service Provider; Medical Care; Report; Confidentiality of Newborn's Mother and Father; Transmission of Information to Newborn's Mother.

333.1073 Abortion resulting in live birth; surrender of newborn to emergency service provider; medical care; report; confidentiality of newborn's mother and father; transmission of information to newborn's mother. Sec. 3.  (1) If an abortion results in a live birth and, after being informed of the newborn's live birth, the newborn's mother expresses a desire not to assume custody and responsibility for the newborn, by refusing to authorize all necessary life sustaining medical treatment for the newborn or releasing the newborn for adoption, the newborn shall be considered a newborn who has been surrendered to an emergency service provider under the safe delivery of newborns law, chapter XII of the probate code of 1939, 1939 PA 288, MCL 712.1 to 712.20. The procedures of the safe delivery of newborns law, chapter XII of the probate code of 1939, 1939 PA 288, MCL 712.1 to 712.20, shall be followed in regard to the custody and care of the newborn.  (2) If an abortion performed in a hospital setting results in a live birth, the physician attending the abortion shall provide immediate medical care to the newborn, inform the mother of the live birth, and request transfer of the newborn to a resident, on-duty, or emergency room physician who shall provide medical care to the newborn. If an abortion performed in other than a hospital setting results in a live birth, a physician attending the abortion shall provide immediate medical care to the newborn and call 9-1-1 for an emergency transfer of the newborn to a hospital that shall provide medical care to the newborn.  (3) A live birth described in this act shall be reported as required in section 2822 of the public health code, 1978 PA 368, MCL 333.2822.  (4) If a newborn is considered a newborn who has been surrendered to an emergency service provider under the safe delivery of newborns law, chapter XII of the probate code of 1939, 1939 PA 288, MCL 712.1 to 712.20, as provided in subsection (1), the identity of the newborn's mother and father becomes confidential and shall not be revealed, either orally or in writing.  (5) The attending physician who transfers care of a live newborn under this section to another physician or a 9-1-1 emergency responder shall transmit to the mother of the newborn any information provided to the attending physician by the emergency service provider who received custody of the newborn under the safe delivery of newborns law, chapter XII of the probate code of 1939, 1939 PA 288, MCL 712.1 to 712.20, as provided in section 3 of the safe delivery of newborns law, chapter XII of the probate code of 1939, 1939 PA 288, MCL 712.3. History: 2002, Act 687, Eff. Mar. 31, 2003
MI Comp L § 333.1081 (2021)
2021 Michigan Compiled Laws|Chapter 333 - Health|Act 135 of 2004 - Legal Birth Definition Act (333.1081 - 333.1085)|Section 333.1081 - Short Title.

333.1081 Short title. Sec. 1.  This act shall be known and may be cited as the "legal birth definition act". History: 2004, Act 135, Eff. Mar. 30, 2005 Constitutionality: The U.S. 6th Circuit Court of Appeals, affirming the U.S. District Court's decision in Northland Family Planning v Cox (docket Nos. 05-2417 and 05-2418, published June 4, 2007), held that the Legal Birth Definition Act, an act initiated by citizen petition, is unconstitutional. The court held that "invalidation of the law is the only available course" since the act "imposed an undue burden on a woman's right to terminate her pregnancy by prohibiting the D and E procedure, because it failed to adequately protect the health of the woman, and because it was void for vagueness due to its confusing language."
MI Comp L § 333.1082 (2021)
2021 Michigan Compiled Laws|Chapter 333 - Health|Act 135 of 2004 - Legal Birth Definition Act (333.1081 - 333.1085)|Section 333.1082 - Findings.

333.1082 Findings. Sec. 2.  The following findings are hereby made:  (a) That in Roe v Wade the United States supreme court declared that an unborn child is not a person as understood and protected by the constitution, but any born child is a legal person with full constitutional and legal rights.  (b) That in Roe v Wade the United States supreme court made no effort to define birth or place any restrictions on the states in defining when a human being is considered born for legal purposes.  (c) That, when any portion of a human being has been vaginally delivered outside his or her mother's body, that portion of the body can only be described as born and the state has a rational basis for defining that human being as born and as a legal person.  (d) That the state has a compelling interest in protecting the life of a born person. History: 2004, Act 135, Eff. Mar. 30, 2005 Constitutionality: In Northland Family Planning Clinic v Cox, 396 F Supp 2d 978 (2005), the federal court for the Eastern District of Michigan held that the legal definition of birth act is unconstitutional because it places an undue burden on a woman's right to an abortion, does not provide a sufficient maternal health exception, requires the physician to balance the maternal and neonatal interests in the life exception, and fails to give clear notice of the activities that are prohibited. (The case is now on appeal to 6th circuit.)The U.S. 6th Circuit Court of Appeals, affirming the U.S. District Court's decision in Northland Family Planning v Cox (docket Nos. 05-2417 and 05-2418, published June 4, 2007), held that the Legal Birth Definition Act, an act initiated by citizen petition, is unconstitutional. The court held that "invalidation of the law is the only available course" since the act "imposed an undue burden on a woman's right to terminate her pregnancy by prohibiting the D and E procedure, because it failed to adequately protect the health of the woman, and because it was void for vagueness due to its confusing language."
MI Comp L § 333.1083 (2021)
2021 Michigan Compiled Laws|Chapter 333 - Health|Act 135 of 2004 - Legal Birth Definition Act (333.1081 - 333.1085)|Section 333.1083 - Perinate as Legally Born Person; Immunity.

333.1083 Perinate as legally born person; immunity. Sec. 3.  (1) A perinate shall be considered a legally born person for all purposes under the law.  (2) A physician or an individual performing an act, task, or function under the delegatory authority of a physician is immune from criminal, civil, or administrative liability for performing any procedure that results in injury or death of a perinate while completing the delivery of the perinate under any of the following circumstances:  (a) If the perinate is being expelled from the mother's body as a result of a spontaneous abortion.  (b) If in that physician's reasonable medical judgment and in compliance with the applicable standard of practice and care, the procedure was necessary in either of the following circumstances:  (i) To save the life of the mother and every reasonable effort was made to preserve the life of both the mother and the perinate.  (ii) To avert an imminent threat to the physical health of the mother, and any harm to the perinate was incidental to treating the mother and not a known or intended result of the procedure performed. History: 2004, Act 135, Eff. Mar. 30, 2005 Constitutionality: In Northland Family Planning Clinic v Cox, 396 F Supp 2d 978 (2005), the federal court for the Eastern District of Michigan held that the legal definition of birth act is unconstitutional because it places an undue burden on a woman's right to an abortion, does not provide a sufficient maternal health exception, requires the physician to balance the maternal and neonatal interests in the life exception, and fails to give clear notice of the activities that are prohibited. (The case is now on appeal to 6th circuit.)The U.S. 6th Circuit Court of Appeals, affirming the U.S. District Court's decision in Northland Family Planning v Cox (docket Nos. 05-2417 and 05-2418, published June 4, 2007), held that the Legal Birth Definition Act, an act initiated by citizen petition, is unconstitutional. The court held that "invalidation of the law is the only available course" since the act "imposed an undue burden on a woman's right to terminate her pregnancy by prohibiting the D and E procedure, because it failed to adequately protect the health of the woman, and because it was void for vagueness due to its confusing language."
MI Comp L § 333.1084 (2021)
2021 Michigan Compiled Laws|Chapter 333 - Health|Act 135 of 2004 - Legal Birth Definition Act (333.1081 - 333.1085)|Section 333.1084 - Existing Right, Privilege, or Protection.

333.1084 Existing right, privilege, or protection. Sec. 4.  Nothing in this act shall abrogate any existing right, privilege, or protection under criminal or civil law that applies to an embryo or fetus. History: 2004, Act 135, Eff. Mar. 30, 2005 Constitutionality: In Northland Family Planning Clinic v Cox, 396 F Supp 2d 978 (2005), the federal court for the Eastern District of Michigan held that the legal definition of birth act is unconstitutional because it places an undue burden on a woman's right to an abortion, does not provide a sufficient maternal health exception, requires the physician to balance the maternal and neonatal interests in the life exception, and fails to give clear notice of the activities that are prohibited. (The case is now on appeal to 6th circuit.)The U.S. 6th Circuit Court of Appeals, affirming the U.S. District Court's decision in Northland Family Planning v Cox (docket Nos. 05-2417 and 05-2418, published June 4, 2007), held that the Legal Birth Definition Act, an act initiated by citizen petition, is unconstitutional. The court held that "invalidation of the law is the only available course" since the act "imposed an undue burden on a woman's right to terminate her pregnancy by prohibiting the D and E procedure, because it failed to adequately protect the health of the woman, and because it was void for vagueness due to its confusing language."
MI Comp L § 333.1085 (2021)
2021 Michigan Compiled Laws|Chapter 333 - Health|Act 135 of 2004 - Legal Birth Definition Act (333.1081 - 333.1085)|Section 333.1085 - Definitions.

333.1085 Definitions.Sec. 5.  As used in this act:  (a) "Anatomical part" means any portion of the anatomy of a human being that has not been severed from the body, but not including the umbilical cord or placenta.  (b) "Imminent threat to the physical health" means a physical condition that if left untreated would result in substantial and irreversible impairment of a major bodily function.  (c) "Live" means demonstrating 1 or more of the following biological functions:  (i) A detectable heartbeat.  (ii) Evidence of breathing.  (iii) Evidence of spontaneous movement.  (iv) Umbilical cord pulsation.  (d) "Perinate" means a live human being at any point after which any anatomical part of the human being is know to have passed beyond the plane of the vaginal introitus until the point of complete expulsion or extraction from the mother's body.  (e) "Physician" means an individual licensed by the state to engage in the practice of medicine or osteopathic medicine and surgery under article 15 of the public health code, 1978 PA 368, MCL 333.16101 to 333.18838. History: 2004, Act 135, Eff. Mar. 30, 2005 Constitutionality: In Northland Family Planning Clinic v Cox, 396 F Supp 2d 978 (2005), the federal court for the Eastern District of Michigan held that the legal definition of birth act is unconstitutional because it places an undue burden on a woman's right to an abortion, does not provide a sufficient maternal health exception, requires the physician to balance the maternal and neonatal interests in the life exception, and fails to give clear notice of the activities that are prohibited. (The case is now on appeal to 6th circuit.)The U.S. 6th Circuit Court of Appeals, affirming the U.S. District Court's decision in Northland Family Planning v Cox (docket Nos. 05-2417 and 05-2418, published June 4, 2007), held that the Legal Birth Definition Act, an act initiated by citizen petition, is unconstitutional. The court held that "invalidation of the law is the only available course" since the act "imposed an undue burden on a woman's right to terminate her pregnancy by prohibiting the D and E procedure, because it failed to adequately protect the health of the woman, and because it was void for vagueness due to its confusing language."
MI Comp L § 333.26201 (2021)
2021 Michigan Compiled Laws|Chapter 333 - Health|Act 204 of 1987 - Low-Level Radioactive Waste Authority Act (333.26201 - 333.26226)|Section 333.26201 - Short Title.

333.26201 Short title. Sec. 1.  This act shall be known and may be cited as the "low-level radioactive waste authority act".  History: 1987, Act 204, Imd. Eff. Dec. 22, 1987 Compiler's Notes: For abolition of the Department of Natural Resources and transfer of its powers, duties, and functions of the Director of the Department of Natural Resources, the Natural Resources Commission, and agencies, boards and commissions contained in the department, including the functions of budget, procurement, and management-related functions to the new Department of Natural Resources, with the exception that the power to designate a member of the commission is vested in the Governor, see E.R.O. No. 1991-22 compiled at MCL 299.13 of the Michigan Compiled Laws.For transfer of powers and duties of the Low-Level Radioactive Waste Authority from the Department of Management and Budget to the Director of the Department of Commerce, see E.R.O. No. 1991-23, compiled MCL 332.26251 of the Michigan Compiled Laws.For transfer of powers and duties of the low-level radioactive waste authority from the department of commerce to the Michigan department of environmental quality, see E.R.O. No. 1996-2, compiled at MCL 445.2001 of the Michigan Compiled Laws.
MI Comp L § 333.26203 (2021)
2021 Michigan Compiled Laws|Chapter 333 - Health|Act 204 of 1987 - Low-Level Radioactive Waste Authority Act (333.26201 - 333.26226)|Section 333.26203 - Low-Level Radioactive Waste Authority; Creation; Autonomous Entity; Commissioner as Head of Authority; Appointment, Qualifications, and Term of Commissioner; Vacancy; Salary; Exemption From Civil Service; Employment of Personnel.

333.26203 Low-level radioactive waste authority; creation; autonomous entity; commissioner as head of authority; appointment, qualifications, and term of commissioner; vacancy; salary; exemption from civil service; employment of personnel. Sec. 3.  (1) An authority is created to be known as the low-level radioactive waste authority. The authority is an autonomous entity within the department of commerce. The authority shall exercise its powers and duties independently of the department of commerce, including the budgeting, procurement, contracting for, and actual purchase of all equipment, supplies, and services of whatever kind necessary to implement this act.  (2) The head of the authority is the commissioner who shall be qualified by training and experience to direct the work of the authority. The commissioner shall be appointed by the governor, by and with the advice and consent of the senate, and shall serve a 2-year term at the pleasure of the governor. A vacancy occurring in the office of the commissioner shall be filled in the same manner as the original appointment. The commissioner shall receive a salary as provided by annual appropriation by the legislature from the low-level radioactive waste management fund.  (3) The commissioner is exempt from civil service. The commissioner is responsible directly to the governor to ensure the accountability and integrity of the authority and accordingly should be a position within the department of commerce that is exempt from the classified state civil service. The department of commerce shall request that the civil service commission establish the commissioner's position as a position that is exempt from the classified state civil service.   (4) The commissioner shall employ personnel as necessary to implement this act. History: 1987, Act 204, Imd. Eff. Dec. 22, 1987 ;-- Am. 1994, Act 434, Imd. Eff. Jan. 6, 1995 Compiler's Notes: For transfer of low-level radioactive waste authority from department of environmental quality to department of natural resources and environment, see E.R.O. No. 2009-31, compiled at MCL 324.99919.For transfer of powers and duties of commissioner of low-level radioactive waste authority to department of natural resources and environment by type III transfer, see E.R.O. No. 2009-31, compiled at MCL 324.99919.For transfer of low-level radioactive waste authority from department of natural resources and environment to department of environmental quality, see E.R.O. No. 2011-1, compiled at MCL 324.99921.