725 ILCS 5/108B-7.5
2021 Illinois Compiled Statutes|Chapter 725 - CRIMINAL PROCEDURE|725 ILCS 5/ - Code of Criminal Procedure of 1963.|Title II - Apprehension And Investigation

Sec. 108B-7.5. Applicability.(a) The requirements of  subdivisions (a)(3)(iv) and (a)(3)(v) of Section 108B-4, subdivision (1)(b) of  Section 108B-5, and subdivision (a)(3) of Section 108B-7 of this Article  relating to the specification of  the facilities from which, or the place where, the communication is to be  intercepted do not apply if:(1) in the case of an application with respect to the     interception of an oral communication:(A) the application is by the State's Attorney,         or a person designated in writing or by law to act for the State's Attorney and to perform his or her duties during his or her absence or disability;(B) the application contains a full and complete         statement as to why such specification is not practical and identifies the person committing the offense and whose communications are to be intercepted;(C) the judge finds that such specification is         not practical; and(D) the order sought is in connection with an         investigation of a violation of Article 29D of the Criminal Code of 1961 or the Criminal Code of 2012.(2) in the case of an application with respect to a     wire or electronic communication:(A) the application is by the State's Attorney,         or a person designated in writing or by law to act for the State's Attorney and to perform his or her duties during his or her absence or disability;(B) the application identifies the person         believed to be committing the offense and whose communications are to be intercepted and the applicant makes a showing that there is probable cause to believe that the person's actions could have the effect of thwarting interception from a specified facility;(C) the judge finds that such showing has been         adequately made;(D) the order authorizing or approving the         interception is limited to interception only for such time as it is reasonable to presume that the person identified in the application is or was reasonably proximate to the instrument through which such communication will be or was transmitted; and(E) the order sought is in connection with an         investigation of a violation of Article 29D of the Criminal Code of 1961 or the Criminal Code of 2012.(b) An interception of a communication under an order with respect to which  the requirements of  subdivisions (a)(3)(iv) and (a)(3)(v) of Section 108B-4, subdivision (1)(b) of  Section 108B-5, and subdivision (a)(3) of Section 108B-7 of this Article do  not apply by reason of this Section  shall not begin until the place where the communication is to be intercepted is  ascertained by the person implementing the interception order. A provider of  wire or electronic communications service that has received an order as  provided for in subdivision (a)(2) may upon notice to the People move the court  to modify or quash the  order on the ground that its assistance with respect to the interception cannot  be performed in a timely or reasonable fashion. The court  shall decide such a motion expeditiously.  (Source: P.A. 97-1150, eff. 1-25-13.)