reglab/housing_qa huggingface dataset:
MD. Commercial Law Code Ann. §  22-707 (2021)
2021 Maryland Statutes|Commercial Law|Title 22 - Maryland Uniform Computer Information Transactions Act|Subtitle 7 - Breach of Contract; General; Defective Copies; Repudiation and Assurances|Section 22-707 - Copy: Revocation of Acceptance

    (a)    A party that accepts a nonconforming tender of a copy may revoke acceptance only if the nonconformity is a material breach of contract and the party accepted it:        (1)    On the reasonable assumption that the nonconformity would be cured, and the nonconformity was not seasonably cured;        (2)    During a continuing effort by the party in breach at adjustment and cure, and the breach was not seasonably cured; or        (3)    Without discovery of the nonconformity, if acceptance was reasonably induced either by the other party’s assurances or by the difficulty of discovery before acceptance.    (b)    Revocation of acceptance is not effective until the revoking party notifies the other party of the revocation.    (c)    Revocation of acceptance of a copy is precluded if:        (1)    It does not occur within a reasonable time after the party attempting to revoke discovers or should have discovered the ground for it;        (2)    It occurs after a substantial change in condition not caused by defects in the information, such as after the party commingles the information in a manner that makes its return impossible; or        (3)    The party attempting to revoke received a substantial benefit or value from the information, and the benefit or value cannot be returned.    (d)    A party that rightfully revokes has the same duties and is under the same restrictions as if the party had refused tender of the copy.
MD. Commercial Law Code Ann. §  22-708 (2021)
2021 Maryland Statutes|Commercial Law|Title 22 - Maryland Uniform Computer Information Transactions Act|Subtitle 7 - Breach of Contract; General; Defective Copies; Repudiation and Assurances|Section 22-708 - Adequate Assurance of Performance

    (a)    A contract imposes an obligation on each party not to impair the other’s expectation of receiving due performance. If reasonable grounds for insecurity arise with respect to the performance of either party, the aggrieved party may:        (1)    Demand in a record adequate assurance of due performance; and        (2)    Until that assurance is received, if commercially reasonable, suspend any performance, other than with respect to contractual use terms, for which the agreed return performance has not been received.    (b)    Between merchants, the reasonableness of grounds for insecurity and the adequacy of any assurance offered is determined according to commercial standards.    (c)    Acceptance of any improper delivery or payment does not impair an aggrieved party’s right to demand adequate assurance of future performance.    (d)    After receipt of a justified demand under subsection (a) of this section, failure, within a reasonable time not exceeding 30 days, to provide assurance of due performance which is adequate under the circumstances of the particular case is a repudiation of the contract under § 22-709 of this subtitle.
MD. Commercial Law Code Ann. §  22-709 (2021)
2021 Maryland Statutes|Commercial Law|Title 22 - Maryland Uniform Computer Information Transactions Act|Subtitle 7 - Breach of Contract; General; Defective Copies; Repudiation and Assurances|Section 22-709 - Anticipatory Repudiation

    (a)    If a party to a contract repudiates a performance not yet due and the loss of performance will substantially impair the value of the contract to the other party, the aggrieved party may:        (1)    Await performance by the repudiating party for a commercially reasonable time or resort to any remedy for breach of contract, even if it has urged the repudiating party to retract the repudiation or has notified the repudiating party that it would await its performance; and        (2)    In either case, suspend its own performance or proceed in accordance with § 22-812 or § 22-813 of this title, as applicable.    (b)    Repudiation includes language that one party will not or cannot make a performance still due under the contract or voluntary, affirmative conduct that reasonably appears to the other party to make a future performance impossible.
MD. Commercial Law Code Ann. §  22-710 (2021)
2021 Maryland Statutes|Commercial Law|Title 22 - Maryland Uniform Computer Information Transactions Act|Subtitle 7 - Breach of Contract; General; Defective Copies; Repudiation and Assurances|Section 22-710 - Retraction of Anticipatory Repudiation

    (a)    A repudiating party may retract its repudiation until its next performance is due unless the aggrieved party, after the repudiation, has canceled the contract, materially changed its position, or otherwise indicated that it considers the repudiation final.    (b)    A retraction may be by any method that clearly indicates to the aggrieved party that the repudiating party intends to perform the contract. However, a retraction must contain any assurance justifiably demanded under § 22-708 of this subtitle.    (c)    Retraction restores a repudiating party’s rights under the contract with due excuse and allowance to the aggrieved party for any delay caused by the repudiation.
MD. Commercial Law Code Ann. §  22-801 (2021)
2021 Maryland Statutes|Commercial Law|Title 22 - Maryland Uniform Computer Information Transactions Act|Subtitle 8 - Remedies; General; Damages; Remedies Related to Performance|Section 22-801 - Remedies in General

    (a)    The remedies provided in this title are cumulative, but a party may not recover more than once for the same loss.    (b)    Except as otherwise provided in §§ 22-803 and 22-804 of this subtitle, if a party is in breach of contract, whether or not the breach is material, the aggrieved party has the remedies provided in the agreement or this title, but the aggrieved party shall continue to comply with any contractual use terms with respect to information or copies received from the other party, but the contractual use terms do not apply to information or copies properly received or obtained from another source.    (c)    Rescission or a claim for rescission of the contract, or refusal of the information, does not preclude and is not inconsistent with a claim for damages or other remedy.
MD. Commercial Law Code Ann. §  22-803 (2021)
2021 Maryland Statutes|Commercial Law|Title 22 - Maryland Uniform Computer Information Transactions Act|Subtitle 8 - Remedies; General; Damages; Remedies Related to Performance|Section 22-803 - Contractual Modification of Remedy

    (a)    Except as otherwise provided in this section and in § 22-804 of this subtitle:        (1)    An agreement may provide for remedies in addition to or in substitution for those provided in this title and may limit or alter the measure of damages recoverable under this title or a party’s other remedies under this title, such as by precluding a party’s right to cancel for breach of contract, limiting remedies to returning or delivering copies and repayment of the contract fee, or limiting remedies to repair or replacement of the nonconforming copies; and        (2)    Resort to a contractual remedy is optional unless the remedy is expressly agreed to be exclusive, in which case it is the sole remedy.    (b)    Subject to subsection (c) of this section, if performance of an exclusive or limited remedy causes the remedy to fail of its essential purpose, the aggrieved party may pursue other remedies under this title.    (c)    Failure or unconscionability of an agreed exclusive or limited remedy makes a term disclaiming or limiting consequential or incidental damages unenforceable unless the agreement expressly makes the disclaimer or limitation independent of the agreed remedy.    (d)    Consequential damages and incidental damages may be excluded or limited by agreement unless the exclusion or limitation is unconscionable. Exclusion or limitation of consequential damages for personal injury in a consumer contract for a computer program that is subject to this title and is contained in consumer goods is prima facie unconscionable, but exclusion or limitation of damages for a commercial loss is not unconscionable.
MD. Commercial Law Code Ann. §  22-804 (2021)
2021 Maryland Statutes|Commercial Law|Title 22 - Maryland Uniform Computer Information Transactions Act|Subtitle 8 - Remedies; General; Damages; Remedies Related to Performance|Section 22-804 - Liquidation of Damages

    (a)    Damages for breach of contract by either party may be liquidated by agreement in an amount that is reasonable in light of:        (1)    The loss anticipated at the time of contracting;        (2)    The actual loss; or        (3)    The actual or anticipated difficulties of proving loss in the event of breach.    (b)    If a term liquidating damages is unenforceable under this subsection, the aggrieved party may pursue the remedies provided in this title, except as limited by other terms of the contract.    (c)    If a party justifiably withholds delivery of copies because of the other party’s breach of contract, the party in breach is entitled to restitution for any amount by which the sum of the payments it made for the copies exceeds the amount of the liquidated damages payable to the aggrieved party in accordance with subsection (a) of this section. The right to restitution is subject to offset to the extent that the aggrieved party establishes:        (1)    A right to recover damages other than under subsection (a) of this section; and        (2)    The amount or value of any benefits received by the party in breach, directly or indirectly, by reason of the contract.    (d)    A term that does not liquidate damages, but that limits damages available to the aggrieved party, must be evaluated under § 22-803 of this subtitle.
MD. Commercial Law Code Ann. §  22-805 (2021)
2021 Maryland Statutes|Commercial Law|Title 22 - Maryland Uniform Computer Information Transactions Act|Subtitle 8 - Remedies; General; Damages; Remedies Related to Performance|Section 22-805 - Limitation of Actions

    (a)    Except as otherwise provided in subsection (b) of this section, an action for breach of contract must be commenced within the later of four years after the right of action accrues or one year after the breach was or should have been discovered, but not later than five years after the right of action accrues.    (b)    If the original agreement of the parties alters the period of limitations, the following rules apply:        (1)    The parties may reduce the period of limitation to not less than one year after the right of action accrues but may not extend it.        (2)    In a mass-market transaction, the period of limitation may not be reduced.    (c)    Except as otherwise provided in subsection (d) of this section, a right of action accrues when the act or omission constituting a breach of contract occurs, even if the aggrieved party did not know of the breach. A right of action for breach of warranty accrues when tender of delivery of a copy pursuant to § 22-606 of this title, or access to the information, occurs. However, if the warranty expressly extends to future performance of the information or a copy, the right of action accrues when the performance fails to conform to the warranty, but not later than the date the warranty expires.    (d)    In the following cases, a right of action accrues on the later of the date the act or omission constituting the breach of contract occurred or the date on which it was or should have been discovered by the aggrieved party, but not earlier than the date for delivery of a copy if the claim relates to information in the copy:        (1)    A breach of warranty against third-party claims for:            (A)    Infringement or misappropriation; or            (B)    Libel, slander, or the like;        (2)    A breach of contract involving a party’s disclosure or misuse of confidential information; or        (3)    A failure to provide an indemnity or to perform another obligation to protect or defend against a third-party claim.    (e)    If an action commenced within the period of limitation is so concluded as to leave available a remedy by another action for the same breach of contract, the other action may be commenced after expiration of the period of limitation if the action is commenced within six months after conclusion of the first action, unless the action was concluded as a result of voluntary discontinuance or dismissal for failure or neglect to prosecute.    (f)    This section does not alter the law on tolling of the statute of limitations and does not apply to a right of action that accrued before the effective date of this title.
MD. Commercial Law Code Ann. §  22-806 (2021)
2021 Maryland Statutes|Commercial Law|Title 22 - Maryland Uniform Computer Information Transactions Act|Subtitle 8 - Remedies; General; Damages; Remedies Related to Performance|Section 22-806 - Remedies for Fraud

    Remedies for material misrepresentation or fraud include all remedies available under this title for nonfraudulent breach of contract.
MD. Commercial Law Code Ann. §  22-807 (2021)
2021 Maryland Statutes|Commercial Law|Title 22 - Maryland Uniform Computer Information Transactions Act|Subtitle 8 - Remedies; General; Damages; Remedies Related to Performance|Section 22-807 - Measurement of Damages in General

    (a)    Except as otherwise provided in the contract, an aggrieved party may not recover compensation for that part of a loss which could have been avoided by taking measures reasonable under the circumstances to avoid or reduce loss. The burden of establishing a failure of the aggrieved party to take measures reasonable under the circumstances is on the party in breach of contract.    (b)    A party may not recover:        (1)    Consequential damages for losses resulting from the content of published informational content unless the agreement expressly so provides; or        (2)    Damages that are speculative.    (c)    The remedy for breach of contract for disclosure or misuse of information that is a trade secret or in which the aggrieved party has a right of confidentiality includes as consequential damages compensation for the benefit obtained as a result of the breach.    (d)    For purposes of this title, market value is determined as of the date of breach of contract and the place for performance.    (e)    Damages or expenses that relate to events after the date of entry of judgment must be reduced to their present value as of that date. In this subsection, “present value” means the amount, as of a date certain, of one or more sums payable in the future or the value of one or more performances due in the future, discounted to the date certain. The discount is determined by the interest rate specified by the parties in their agreement unless that rate was manifestly unreasonable when the agreement was entered into. Otherwise, the discount is determined by a commercially reasonable rate that takes into account the circumstances of each case when the agreement was entered into.
MD. Commercial Law Code Ann. §  22-808 (2021)
2021 Maryland Statutes|Commercial Law|Title 22 - Maryland Uniform Computer Information Transactions Act|Subtitle 8 - Remedies; General; Damages; Remedies Related to Performance|Section 22-808 - Licensor's Damages

    (a)    In this section, “substitute transaction” means a transaction by the licensor which would not have been possible except for the licensee’s breach and which transaction is for the same information or informational rights with the same contractual use terms as the transaction to which the licensee’s breach applies.    (b)    Except as otherwise provided in § 22-807 of this subtitle, a breach of contract by a licensee entitles the licensor to recover the following compensation for losses resulting in the ordinary course from the breach, less expenses avoided as a result of the breach, to the extent not otherwise accounted for under this subsection:        (1)    Damages measured in any combination of the following ways but not to exceed the contract fee and the market value of other consideration required under the contract for the performance that was the subject of the breach:            (A)    The amount of accrued and unpaid contract fees and the market value of other consideration earned but not received for:                (i)    Any performance accepted by the licensee; and                (ii)    Any performance to which § 22-604 of this title applies;            (B)    For performances not governed by subparagraph (A) of this paragraph, if the licensee repudiated or wrongfully refused the performance or the licensor rightfully canceled and the breach makes possible a substitute transaction, the amount of loss as determined by contract fees and the market value of other consideration required under the contract for the performance less:                (i)    The contract fees and market value of other consideration received from an actual and commercially reasonable substitute transaction entered into by the licensor in good faith and without unreasonable delay; or                (ii)    The market value of a commercially reasonable hypothetical substitute transaction;            (C)    For performances not governed by subparagraph (A) of this paragraph, if the breach does not make possible a substitute transaction, lost profit, including reasonable overhead, that the licensor would have realized on acceptance and full payment for performance that was not delivered to the licensee because of the licensee’s breach; or            (D)    Damages calculated in any reasonable manner; and        (2)    Consequential and incidental damages.
MD. Commercial Law Code Ann. §  22-809 (2021)
2021 Maryland Statutes|Commercial Law|Title 22 - Maryland Uniform Computer Information Transactions Act|Subtitle 8 - Remedies; General; Damages; Remedies Related to Performance|Section 22-809 - Licensee's Damages

    (a)    Subject to subsection (b) of this section and except as otherwise provided in § 22-807 of this subtitle, a breach of contract by a licensor entitles the licensee to recover the following compensation for losses resulting in the ordinary course from the breach or, if appropriate, as to the whole contract, less expenses avoided as a result of the breach to the extent not otherwise accounted for under this section:        (1)    Damages measured in any combination of the following ways, but not to exceed the market value of the performance that was the subject of the breach plus restitution of any amounts paid for performance not received and not accounted for within the indicated recovery:            (A)    With respect to performance that has been accepted and the acceptance not rightfully revoked, the value of the performance required less the value of the performance accepted as of the time and place of acceptance;            (B)    With respect to performance that has not been rendered or that was rightfully refused or acceptance of which was rightfully revoked:                (i)    The amount of any payments made and the value of other consideration given to the licensor with respect to that performance and not previously returned to the licensee;                (ii)    The market value of the performance less the contract fee for that performance; or                (iii)    The cost of a commercially reasonable substitute transaction less the contract fee under the breached contract, if the substitute transaction was entered into by the licensee in good faith and without unreasonable delay for substantially similar information with the same contractual use terms; or            (C)    Damages calculated in any reasonable manner; and        (2)    Incidental and consequential damages.    (b)    The amount of damages must be reduced by any unpaid contract fees for performance by the licensor which has been accepted by the licensee and as to which the acceptance has not been rightfully revoked.
MD. Commercial Law Code Ann. §  22-810 (2021)
2021 Maryland Statutes|Commercial Law|Title 22 - Maryland Uniform Computer Information Transactions Act|Subtitle 8 - Remedies; General; Damages; Remedies Related to Performance|Section 22-810 - Recoupment

    (a)    Except as otherwise provided in subsection (b) of this section, an aggrieved party, upon notifying the party in breach of contract of its intention to do so, may deduct all or any part of the damages resulting from the breach from any payments still due under the same contract.    (b)    If a breach of contract is not material with reference to the particular performance, an aggrieved party may exercise its rights under subsection (a) of this section only if the agreement does not require further affirmative performance by the other party and the amount of damages deducted can be readily liquidated under the agreement.
MD. Commercial Law Code Ann. §  22-811 (2021)
2021 Maryland Statutes|Commercial Law|Title 22 - Maryland Uniform Computer Information Transactions Act|Subtitle 8 - Remedies; General; Damages; Remedies Related to Performance|Section 22-811 - Specific Performance

    (a)    Specific performance may be ordered:        (1)    If the agreement provides for that remedy, other than an obligation for the payment of money;        (2)    If the contract was not for personal services and the agreed performance is unique; or        (3)    In other proper circumstances.    (b)    An order for specific performance may contain any conditions considered just and must provide adequate safeguards consistent with the contract to protect the confidentiality of information, information, and informational rights of both parties.
MD. Commercial Law Code Ann. §  22-812 (2021)
2021 Maryland Statutes|Commercial Law|Title 22 - Maryland Uniform Computer Information Transactions Act|Subtitle 8 - Remedies; General; Damages; Remedies Related to Performance|Section 22-812 - Completing Performance

    (a)    On breach of contract by a licensee, the licensor may:        (1)    Identify to the contract any conforming copy not already identified if, at the time the licensor learned of the breach, the copy was in its possession;        (2)    In the exercise of reasonable commercial judgment for purposes of avoiding loss and effective realization on effort or investment, complete the information and identify it to the contract, cease work on it, relicense or dispose of it, or proceed in any other commercially reasonable manner; and        (3)    Pursue any remedy for breach that has not been waived.    (b)    On breach by a licensee, both parties remain bound by all contractual use terms, but the contractual use terms do not apply to information or copies properly received or obtained from another source.
MD. Commercial Law Code Ann. §  22-813 (2021)
2021 Maryland Statutes|Commercial Law|Title 22 - Maryland Uniform Computer Information Transactions Act|Subtitle 8 - Remedies; General; Damages; Remedies Related to Performance|Section 22-813 - Continuing Use

    On breach of contract by a licensor, the following rules apply:         (1)    A licensee that has not canceled the contract may continue to use the information and informational rights under the contract. If the licensee continues to use the information or informational rights, the licensee is bound by all terms of the contract, including contractual use terms, obligations not to compete, and obligations to pay contract fees.        (2)    The licensee may pursue any remedy for breach which has not been waived.        (3)    The licensor’s rights remain in effect but are subject to the licensee’s remedy for breach, including any right of recoupment or setoff.