reglab/housing_qa huggingface dataset:
NE Code § 25-12,101 (2021)
2021 Nebraska Revised Statutes|Chapter 25 - Courts; Civil Procedure|25-12,101 - Judicial notice.

25-12,101.  Judicial notice.Every court of this state shall take judicial notice of the common law and statutes of every state, territory and other jurisdiction of the United States.Source  Laws 1947, c. 93, § 1, p. 272. Annotations  Where statutes of sister state have not been interpreted, the courts of this state will give a practical interpretation thereto. Exstrum v. Union Cas. & Life Ins. Co., 165 Neb. 554, 86 N.W.2d 568 (1957). Act is applicable to any action seeking to enforce rights based upon the common law or statute law of another state. Abramson v. Abramson, 161 Neb. 782, 74 N.W.2d 919 (1956). Provisions of this act must be properly invoked. Smith v. Brooks, 154 Neb. 93, 47 N.W.2d 389 (1951). Uniform Judicial Notice of Foreign Law Act does not remove the necessity of pleading and presenting the common law or statutes of sister state. Scott v. Scott, 153 Neb. 906, 46 N.W.2d 627 (1951). District court was authorized to take judicial notice of the laws of Colorado. Snyder v. Lincoln, 153 Neb. 611, 45 N.W.2d 749 (1951). The federal court sitting in Nebraska without violating doctrine of Erie R. Co. v. Tompkins, takes judicial notice of law of another state although it was not pleaded and proved and although under Nebraska law, if law of foreign state is not pleaded and proved, it is presumed to be the same as the law of the forum. Fullington v. Iowa Sheet Metal Contractors, Inc., 319 F.Supp. 243 (D. Neb. 1970).
NE Code § 25-12,102 (2021)
2021 Nebraska Revised Statutes|Chapter 25 - Courts; Civil Procedure|25-12,102 - Information of the court.

25-12,102.  Information of the court.The court may inform itself of such laws in such manner as it may deem proper, and the court may call upon counsel to aid it in obtaining such information.Source  Laws 1947, c. 93, § 2, p. 273. Annotations Court may require party invoking law of sister state to plead and present it. Scott v. Scott, 153 Neb. 906, 46 N.W.2d 627 (1951).
NE Code § 25-12,103 (2021)
2021 Nebraska Revised Statutes|Chapter 25 - Courts; Civil Procedure|25-12,103 - Ruling reviewable.

25-12,103.  Ruling reviewable.The determination of such laws shall be made by the court and not by the jury, and shall be reviewable.Source  Laws 1947, c. 93, § 3, p. 273. Annotations Issue of validity of marriage in another state was properly pleaded and presented. Abramson v. Abramson, 161 Neb. 782, 74 N.W.2d 919 (1956).
NE Code § 25-12,104 (2021)
2021 Nebraska Revised Statutes|Chapter 25 - Courts; Civil Procedure|25-12,104 - Evidence as to laws of other jurisdictions.

25-12,104.  Evidence as to laws of other jurisdictions.Any party may also present to the trial court any admissible evidence of such laws, but, to enable a party to offer evidence of the law in another jurisdiction or to ask that judicial notice be taken thereof, reasonable notice shall be given to the adverse parties either in the pleadings or otherwise.Source  Laws 1947, c. 93, § 4, p. 273. Annotations  In order for litigant to invoke Uniform Judicial Notice of Foreign Law Act, he must give reasonable notice in pleadings or otherwise of intention so to do. Smith v. Brooks, 154 Neb. 93, 47 N.W.2d 389 (1951). To require trial court to take judicial notice of law of another state, it must be pleaded. Scott v. Scott, 153 Neb. 906, 46 N.W.2d 627 (1951).
NE Code § 25-12,105 (2021)
2021 Nebraska Revised Statutes|Chapter 25 - Courts; Civil Procedure|25-12,105 - Foreign country.

25-12,105.  Foreign country.The law of a jurisdiction other than those referred to in section 25-12,101 shall be an issue for the court, but shall not be subject to the foregoing provisions concerning judicial notice.Source  Laws 1947, c. 93, § 5, p. 273. Annotations Laws of a jurisdiction other than state or territory of the United States must be both pleaded and proved. Scott v. Scott, 153 Neb. 906, 46 N.W.2d 627 (1951).
NE Code § 25-12,106 (2021)
2021 Nebraska Revised Statutes|Chapter 25 - Courts; Civil Procedure|25-12,106 - Interpretation.

25-12,106.  Interpretation.Sections 25-12,101 to 25-12,107 shall be so interpreted and construed as to effectuate their general purpose to make uniform the law of those states which enact them.Source  Laws 1947, c. 93, § 6, p. 273. Annotations Operation of act is not dependent upon reciprocal law in another state. Abramson v. Abramson, 161 Neb. 782, 74 N.W.2d 919 (1956).
NE Code § 25-12,107 (2021)
2021 Nebraska Revised Statutes|Chapter 25 - Courts; Civil Procedure|25-12,107 - Short title.

25-12,107.  Short title.Sections 25-12,101 to 25-12,107 may be cited as the Uniform Judicial Notice of Foreign Law Act.Source  Laws 1947, c. 93, § 7, p. 273.
NE Code § 25-12,112 (2021)
2021 Nebraska Revised Statutes|Chapter 25 - Courts; Civil Procedure|25-12,112 - Admissibility of reproduced records in evidence; destruction of records; approval.

25-12,112.  Admissibility of reproduced records in evidence; destruction of records; approval.If any business, institution, member of a profession or calling, or department or agency of government in the regular course of business or activity has kept or recorded any memorandum, writing, entry, print, representation, or combination thereof of any act, transaction, occurrence, or event and in the regular course of business has caused any or all of the same to be recorded, copied, or reproduced by any photographic, photostatic, optical imagery, microfilm, microcard, miniature photographic, optical disk, or other process which accurately reproduces or forms a durable medium for so reproducing the original, the original may be destroyed in the regular course of business unless held in a custodial or fiduciary capacity or unless its preservation is required by law and, with respect to agencies or departments of government, if the State Records Administrator approves such destruction. Such reproduction, when satisfactorily identified, is as admissible in evidence as the original itself in any judicial or administrative proceeding whether the original is in existence or not and an enlargement or facsimile of such reproduction is likewise admissible in evidence if the original reproduction is in existence and available for inspection under direction of the court. The introduction of a reproduced record, enlargement, or facsimile does not preclude admission of the original.Source   Laws 1951, c. 56, § 1, p. 188;   Laws 1969, c. 105, § 6, p. 481;   Laws 1991, LB 25, § 1;   Laws 1994, LB 980, § 1.  Cross References  Credit union records, see section 21-1737.Annotations Copy of memorandum from Postmaster General regarding early retirement opportunities was admissible hereunder. Corn v. Corn, 190 Neb. 383, 208 N.W.2d 678 (1973).
NE Code § 25-12,113 (2021)
2021 Nebraska Revised Statutes|Chapter 25 - Courts; Civil Procedure|25-12,113 - Sections, how construed.

25-12,113.  Sections, how construed.Sections 25-12,112 to 25-12,114 shall be so interpreted and construed as to effectuate their general purpose of making uniform the law of those states which enact them.Source  Laws 1951, c. 56, § 2, p. 189.
NE Code § 25-12,114 (2021)
2021 Nebraska Revised Statutes|Chapter 25 - Courts; Civil Procedure|25-12,114 - Act, how cited.

25-12,114.  Act, how cited.Sections 25-12,112 to 25-12,114 may be cited as the Uniform Photographic Copies of Business and Public Records as Evidence Act.Source  Laws 1951, c. 56, § 3, p. 189.
NE Code § 25-12,115 (2021)
2021 Nebraska Revised Statutes|Chapter 25 - Courts; Civil Procedure|25-12,115 - Report or finding admissible.

25-12,115.  Report or finding admissible.A written report or finding of facts prepared by an expert not being a party to the cause, nor an employee of a party, except for the purpose of making such report or finding, nor financially interested in the result of the controversy, and containing the conclusions resulting wholly or partly from written information furnished by the cooperation of several persons acting for a common purpose, shall, insofar as the same may be relevant, be admissible when testified to by the person, or one of the persons, making such report or finding without calling as witnesses the persons furnishing the information, and without producing the books or other writings on which the report or finding is based, if, in the opinion of the court, no substantial injustice will be done the opposite party.Source  Laws 1951, c. 57, § 1, p. 190. Annotations  An offer of a composite record under this act is prima facie sufficient if a proper foundation is laid. Gateway Bank v. Department of Banking, 192 Neb. 109, 219 N.W.2d 211 (1974). Report of results of blood test was admissible in evidence when supported by testimony of doctor who supervised the test. Houghton v. Houghton, 179 Neb. 275, 137 N.W.2d 861 (1965). Application of statute doubted, but sufficient compliance shown. Chicago & N. W. Ry. Co. v. City of Norfolk, 157 Neb. 594, 60 N.W.2d 662 (1953).
NE Code § 25-12,116 (2021)
2021 Nebraska Revised Statutes|Chapter 25 - Courts; Civil Procedure|25-12,116 - Cross-examination by adverse party.

25-12,116.  Cross-examination by adverse party.Any person who has furnished information on which such report or finding is based may be cross-examined by the adverse party, but the fact that his testimony is not obtainable shall not render the report or finding inadmissible, unless the trial court finds that substantial injustice would be done to the adverse party by its admission.Source  Laws 1951, c. 57, § 2, p. 190.
NE Code § 25-12,117 (2021)
2021 Nebraska Revised Statutes|Chapter 25 - Courts; Civil Procedure|25-12,117 - Notice; copy of report or finding.

25-12,117.  Notice; copy of report or finding.Such report or finding shall not be admissible unless the party offering it shall have given notice to the adverse party a reasonable time before trial of his intention to offer it, together with a copy of the report or finding, or so much thereof as may relate to the controversy, and shall also have afforded him a reasonable opportunity to inspect and copy any records or other documents in the offering party's possession or control, on which the report or finding was based, and also the names of all persons furnishing facts upon which the report or finding was based, except that it may be admitted if the trial court finds that no substantial injustice would result from the failure to give such notice.Source  Laws 1951, c. 57, § 3, p. 190. Annotations Trial court is given discretion to admit report in evidence although no copy was served. Trute v. Skeede, 162 Neb. 266, 75 N.W.2d 672 (1956).
NE Code § 25-12,118 (2021)
2021 Nebraska Revised Statutes|Chapter 25 - Courts; Civil Procedure|25-12,118 - Sections, how construed.

25-12,118.  Sections, how construed.Sections 25-12,115 to 25-12,119 shall be so interpreted and construed as to effectuate their general purpose to make uniform the law of those states which enact them.Source  Laws 1951, c. 57, § 4, p. 190.
NE Code § 25-12,119 (2021)
2021 Nebraska Revised Statutes|Chapter 25 - Courts; Civil Procedure|25-12,119 - Act, how cited.

25-12,119.  Act, how cited.Sections 25-12,115 to 25-12,119 may be cited as the Uniform Composite Reports as Evidence Act.Source  Laws 1951, c. 57, § 5, p. 191.
NE Code § 25-12,120 (2021)
2021 Nebraska Revised Statutes|Chapter 25 - Courts; Civil Procedure|25-12,120 - Hospital records; examination and inspection; presumption of consent; hospital medical staff committee; hospitalization utilization committee.

25-12,120.  Hospital records; examination and inspection; presumption of consent; hospital medical staff committee; hospitalization utilization committee.From and after October 23, 1967, in the interest of public health and the improvement of patient medical and hospital care and in the interest of effective utilization of hospital facilities it shall be conclusively presumed that all persons hospitalized in any hospital in the State of Nebraska or confined in any extended care facility in the State of Nebraska have consented to the examination and inspection of all medical records of such hospital or extended care facility relating to such patient's care, treatment and the need for hospitalization or extended care by any hospital medical staff committee or by any utilization review committee for the purpose of studying and evaluating the necessity and the quality of the hospital and medical care and treatment or extended care provided to such patient and the necessity for continuation of such hospitalization or extended care of such patient. Hospital medical staff committee or hospital utilization committee as used in sections 25-12,120 and 25-12,121 shall mean a committee required by federal law or regulation for the purpose of administering in whole or in part a federal program for health care.Source  Laws 1967, c. 142, § 1, p. 437.
NE Code § 25-12,121 (2021)
2021 Nebraska Revised Statutes|Chapter 25 - Courts; Civil Procedure|25-12,121 - Hospital medical staff committee; hospital utilization committee; extended care facility utilization committee; recommendations or orders; liability for damages.

25-12,121.  Hospital medical staff committee; hospital utilization committee; extended care facility utilization committee; recommendations or orders; liability for damages.No hospital medical staff committee or hospital utilization committee or extended care facility utilization committee or any member or agent of any such committee shall be held legally liable for damages or other relief to any patient or to any person or organization in behalf of any patient because of any recommendation or order made by such committee with reference to the hospitalization or continued hospitalization or confinement in an extended care facility of any individual or patient.Source  Laws 1967, c. 142, § 2, p. 438.
NE Code § 25-12,123 (2021)
2021 Nebraska Revised Statutes|Chapter 25 - Courts; Civil Procedure|25-12,123 - Peer review committee; proceedings and records; testimony; use in civil actions; limitation.

25-12,123.  Peer review committee; proceedings and records; testimony; use in civil actions; limitation.The proceedings and records of a peer review committee of a state or local association or society composed of health practitioners licensed pursuant to the Uniform Credentialing Act shall be held in confidence and shall not be subject to discovery or introduction into evidence in any civil action against a person licensed pursuant to the act arising out of the matters which are the subject of evaluation and review by such committee. No person who was in attendance at a meeting of such committee shall be permitted or required to testify in any such civil action as to any evidence or other matters produced or presented during the proceedings of such committee or as to any findings, recommendations, evaluations, opinions, or other actions of such committee or any members thereof, except that information, documents, or records otherwise available from original sources are not to be construed as immune from discovery or use in any such civil action merely because they were presented during proceedings of such committee. Any documents or records which have been presented to the review committee by any witness shall be returned to the witness, if requested by him or her or if ordered to be produced by a court in any action, with copies thereof to be retained by the committee at its discretion. Any person who testifies before such committee or who is a member of such committee shall not be prevented from testifying as to matters within his or her knowledge, but such witness cannot be asked about his or her testimony before such a committee or opinions formed as a result of such committee hearings. Nothing in this section shall prohibit a court of record, after a hearing and for good cause arising from extraordinary circumstances being shown, from ordering the disclosure of such proceedings, minutes, records, reports, or communications.Source   Laws 1982, LB 267, § 1;  Laws 2007, LB463, § 1114. Cross References  Uniform Credentialing Act, see section 38-101.
NE Code § 25-12,124 (2021)
2021 Nebraska Revised Statutes|Chapter 25 - Courts; Civil Procedure|25-12,124 - Statement, defined.

25-12,124.  Statement, defined.As used in sections 25-12,124 to 25-12,126, unless the context otherwise requires, statement shall mean a recorded or written account of the facts out of which an injury arose given by the injured person to a person having an adverse interest. Statement shall not include (1) insurance claims forms, (2) medical authorizations, or (3) personal injury or accident report forms which are completed when an adverse person is not present.Source  Laws 1988, LB 191, § 1.
NE Code § 25-12,125 (2021)
2021 Nebraska Revised Statutes|Chapter 25 - Courts; Civil Procedure|25-12,125 - Rebuttable presumption; when.

25-12,125.  Rebuttable presumption; when.(1) There shall be a rebuttable presumption that any statement secured from an injured person by an adverse person at any time within thirty days after such injuries were sustained shall have been taken under duress for purposes of a trial of any action for damages for injuries sustained by such person or for the death of such person as the result of such injuries.(2) The presumption described in subsection (1) of this section may be rebutted by evidence. The presumption shall be deemed rebutted as a matter of law if the adverse person taking the statement discloses to the injured person prior to taking the statement:(a) Whom he or she represents;(b) That the injured person may make the statement in the presence of counsel or any other representative; and(c) That a copy of the statement is available at no cost to the injured person.Source  Laws 1988, LB 191, § 2. Annotations Under this section, the presumption that a statement was taken under duress may be rebutted by evidence that the statement was not made under duress. Schuemann v. Menard, Inc., 27 Neb. App. 977, 938 N.W.2d 378 (2020).
NE Code § 25-12,126 (2021)
2021 Nebraska Revised Statutes|Chapter 25 - Courts; Civil Procedure|25-12,126 - Sections, how construed.

25-12,126.  Sections, how construed.Nothing in sections 25-12,124 to 25-12,126 shall be construed to supersede, abrogate, or limit any common-law remedies available to any injured person who has given a statement.Source  Laws 1988, LB 191, § 3.
NE Code § 25-1301.01 (2021)
2021 Nebraska Revised Statutes|Chapter 25 - Courts; Civil Procedure|25-1301.01 - Civil judgment or final order; duty of clerk; exception.

25-1301.01.  Civil judgment or final order; duty of clerk; exception.Within three working days after the entry of any civil judgment or final order, except judgments by default when service has been obtained by publication or interlocutory orders styled as judgments, the clerk of the court shall send the judgment or final order by United States mail or by service through the court's electronic case management system to each party whose address appears in the records of the action or to the party's attorney or attorneys of record.Source   Laws 1961, c. 111, § 2, p. 350;   Laws 1969, c. 186, § 1, p. 778;   Laws 1977, LB 124, § 1;  Laws 1999, LB 43, § 4;  Laws 2018, LB193, § 18;  Laws 2020, LB1028, § 4.  Annotations  Where notice of judgment was mailed late, to an attorney no longer representing defendant and to an address where defendant could not be reached, the notification of judgment statute was not complied with, and is additional evidence to permit vacation of a default judgment. Tietsort v. Ranne, 200 Neb. 651, 264 N.W.2d 860 (1978). Where judgment of dismissal was entered and no notice was given by the clerk to the parties, the proper proceeding to correct omissions of the clerk is by motion and notice. Pofahl v. Pofahl, 196 Neb. 347, 243 N.W.2d 55 (1976). This section has no application to the filing of the report of appraisers with the county judge in eminent domain proceedings. Weiner v. State, 179 Neb. 297, 137 N.W.2d 852 (1965). Sending of notice by post card is required as to ruling on motion for new trial where such ruling is a prerequisite to an appeal. Simmons v. Lincoln, 176 Neb. 71, 125 N.W.2d 63 (1963).
NE Code § 25-1303 (2021)
2021 Nebraska Revised Statutes|Chapter 25 - Courts; Civil Procedure|25-1303 - Transcript of judgment to other county; effect.

25-1303.  Transcript of judgment to other county; effect.The transcript of a judgment of any district court in this state may be filed in the office of the clerk of the district court in any county. Such transcript, when so filed and entered on the judgment index, shall be a lien on the property of the debtor in any county in which such transcript is so filed, in the same manner and under the same conditions only as in the county where such judgment was rendered, and execution may be issued on such transcript in the same manner as on the original judgment. Such transcript shall at no time have any greater validity or effect than the original judgment.Source   Laws 1869, § 1, p. 158;   R.S.1913, § 7796;   C.S.1922, § 8937;   Laws 1929, c. 83, § 1, p. 332;   C.S.1929, § 20-1303;   R.S.1943, § 25-1303;  Laws 2018, LB193, § 19.  Cross References  County court judgment, transcript to district court for lien, see section 25-2721.Annotations  Federal court judgments are liens on real estate only in county where rendered unless transcript is filed in other counties. Rathbone Co. v. Kimball, 117 Neb. 229, 220 N.W. 244 (1928). Transcript filed in other county can only be vacated in suit to set aside original judgment; applies in suits to remove cloud on title. State ex rel. Long v. Westover, 107 Neb. 593, 186 N.W. 998 (1922). Motion to revive judgment of district court must be made in court where rendered. Case Threshing Mach. Co. v. Edmisten, 85 Neb. 272, 122 N.W. 891 (1909). Judgment in county court, regardless of amount, may be transcripted to any county in state. Cabon v. Gruenig, 18 Neb. 562, 26 N.W. 253 (1886). Transcript of justice judgment must be filed in district court of county where judgment was rendered. Pemberton v. Pollard, 18 Neb. 435, 25 N.W. 582 (1885).
NE Code § 25-1304 (2021)
2021 Nebraska Revised Statutes|Chapter 25 - Courts; Civil Procedure|25-1304 - Decree for conveyance, release, or acquittance; effect.

25-1304.  Decree for conveyance, release, or acquittance; effect.When any judgment or decree shall be rendered for a conveyance, release or acquittance, in any court of this state, and the party or parties against whom the judgment or decree shall be rendered do not comply therewith within the time mentioned in said judgment or decree, such judgment or decree shall have the same operation and effect, and be as available as if the conveyance, release or acquittance had been executed conformable to such judgment or decree.Source   Laws 1869, § 1, p. 70;   R.S.1913, § 7997;   C.S.1922, § 8938;   C.S.1929, § 20-1304;   R.S.1943, § 25-1304.