reglab/housing_qa huggingface dataset:
CO Code § 13-90-202 (2021)
2021 Colorado Code|Title 13 - Courts and Court Procedure|Article 90 - Witnesses|Part 2 - Appointment of Interpreters for Persons Who Are Deaf or Hard of Hearing|§ 13-90-202. Definitions

 As used in this part 2, unless the context otherwise requires:    “Appointing authority” means the presiding officer or similar official of any court, board, commission, agency, or licensing or law enforcement authority of the state.    “Assistive listening device” means an amplification system that operates in conjunction with a hearing aid to increase the volume of sounds for the hearing aid only.    “Auxiliary services” means those aids and services that assist in effective communication with a person who is deaf, hard of hearing, or deafblind, including:   The services of a qualified interpreter;    The provision of a qualified communication access realtime translation (CART) reporter;    The provision of an assistive listening device; or    The acquisition or modification of equipment or devices to assist in effective communication with a person who is deaf, hard of hearing, or deafblind.       “Commission” means the Colorado commission for the deaf, hard of hearing, and deafblind in the department of human services created in section 26-21-104.    “Communication access realtime translation (CART) reporter” means a word-for-word speech-to-text translation service for the deaf, hard of hearing, or deafblind.    “Deaf, hard of hearing, or deafblind” means a person who has a functional hearing loss of sufficient severity to prevent aural comprehension, even with the assistance of hearing aids.    “Effective communication” means those methods of communication that are individualized and culturally appropriate to a person who is deaf, hard of hearing, or deafblind so that he or she can easily access all auditory information.    “Qualified interpreter” means a person who has a valid certification of competency accepted by the commission and includes, but is not limited to, oral interpreters, sign language interpreters, and intermediary interpreters.    “State court system” means the system of courts, or any part thereof, established pursuant to articles 1 to 9 of this title 13 and article VI of the state constitution. “State court system” does not include the municipal courts or any part thereof.     History. Source: L. 87: Entire part R&RE, p. 570, § 1, effective April 23. L. 94: (4) amended, p. 2642, § 93, effective July 1. L. 2006: Entire section amended, p. 1086, § 2, effective May 25. L. 2009: (1) amended and (9) added,(SB 09-144), ch. 219, p. 992, § 9, effective August 5. L. 2018: (3) to (7) and (9) amended,(HB 18-1108), ch. 303, p. 1833, § 3, effective August 8.    Cross references:   For the legislative declaration contained in the 1994 act amending subsection (4), see section 1 of chapter 345, Session Laws of Colorado 1994.
CO Code § 13-90-203 (2021)
2021 Colorado Code|Title 13 - Courts and Court Procedure|Article 90 - Witnesses|Part 2 - Appointment of Interpreters for Persons Who Are Deaf or Hard of Hearing|§ 13-90-203. Powers and Duties of the Department of Human Services

 The department of human services shall promulgate rules pursuant to article 4 of title 24, C.R.S., which have been proposed by the commission as necessary for the implementation of this part 2. The rule-making process shall be open and available for input from the public, including but not limited to interpreters and consumers of interpreter services.   History. Source: L. 87: Entire part R&RE, p. 571, § 1, effective April 23. L. 94: Entire section amended, p. 2642, § 94, effective July 1. L. 2006: Entire section amended, p. 1087, § 3, effective May 25.    Cross references:   For the legislative declaration contained in the 1994 act amending this section, see section 1 of chapter 345, Session Laws of Colorado 1994.
CO Code § 13-90-205 (2021)
2021 Colorado Code|Title 13 - Courts and Court Procedure|Article 90 - Witnesses|Part 2 - Appointment of Interpreters for Persons Who Are Deaf or Hard of Hearing|§ 13-90-205. Coordination of Auxiliary Services Requests

  The commission, in collaboration with the judicial department, shall establish, monitor, coordinate, and publish a list of available resources regarding communication accessibility for persons who are deaf, hard of hearing, or deafblind, including qualified auxiliary services providers, for use by an appointing authority pursuant to section 13-90-204. The list must contain the names of private individual providers and agencies that secure qualified auxiliary services for assignment.    Whenever a qualified auxiliary service is required pursuant to section 13-90-204, the appointing authority shall secure the auxiliary service through the list of available resources made available and coordinated by the commission in accordance with subsection (1) of this section.    The commission shall provide auxiliary services for a proceeding described by section 13-90-204 (1)(a), (1)(b), or (1)(c). The commission does not have additional responsibilities beyond the requirements of subsection (1) of this section for a proceeding described in section 13-90-204 (1)(d) or (1)(f).     History. Source: L. 87: Entire part R&RE, p. 571, § 1, effective April 23. L. 94: (1) amended, p. 2642, § 95, effective July 1. L. 2006: Entire section amended, p. 1089, § 5, effective May 25. L. 2018: Entire section amended,(HB 18-1108), ch. 303, p. 1835, § 5, effective August 8.    Cross references:   For the legislative declaration contained in the 1994 act amending subsection (1), see section 1 of chapter 345, Session Laws of Colorado 1994.
CO Code § 13-90-206 (2021)
2021 Colorado Code|Title 13 - Courts and Court Procedure|Article 90 - Witnesses|Part 2 - Appointment of Interpreters for Persons Who Are Deaf or Hard of Hearing|§ 13-90-206. Use of an Intermediary Interpreter

 If the qualified interpreter makes a determination that he or she is unable to render a satisfactory interpretation without the aid of an intermediary interpreter, the appointing authority may appoint an intermediary interpreter to assist the qualified interpreter.   History. Source: L. 87: Entire part R&RE, p. 572, § 1, effective April 23. L. 2006: Entire section amended, p. 1089, § 6, effective May 25.
CO Code § 13-90-207 (2021)
2021 Colorado Code|Title 13 - Courts and Court Procedure|Article 90 - Witnesses|Part 2 - Appointment of Interpreters for Persons Who Are Deaf or Hard of Hearing|§ 13-90-207. Requirements to Be Met Prior to Commencing Proceedings

  Prior to commencing any proceedings pursuant to section 13-90-204 requiring a qualified auxiliary services provider, the following conditions shall be met:   A qualified interpreter shall take an oath that he or she shall make a true interpretation in an understandable manner to the best of his or her skills, but such oath shall only be required if the entity presiding over the proceeding has been given, by statute, the authority to administer such an oath.    The qualified auxiliary services provider shall be in full view and spatially situated to assure effective communication with the person or persons who are deaf, hard of hearing, or deafblind.    The appointing authority shall make a reasonable attempt to provide a qualified auxiliary services provider that is effective to the person who is deaf, hard of hearing, or deafblind.        History. Source: L. 87: Entire part R&RE, p. 572, § 1, effective April 23. L. 2006: (1) amended, p. 1089, § 7, effective May 25. L. 2018: IP(1), (1)(b), and (1)(c) amended,(HB 18-1108), ch. 303, p. 1835, § 6, effective August 8.    Editor's note:   This section is similar to former § 13-90-203 as it existed prior to 1987.
CO Code § 13-90-208 (2021)
2021 Colorado Code|Title 13 - Courts and Court Procedure|Article 90 - Witnesses|Part 2 - Appointment of Interpreters for Persons Who Are Deaf or Hard of Hearing|§ 13-90-208. Waiver

 The right of a person who is deaf, hard of hearing, or deafblind to a qualified auxiliary service may not be waived except in writing by the person who is deaf, hard of hearing, or deafblind. Prior to executing a waiver, a person who is deaf, hard of hearing, or deafblind may have access to counsel for advice and shall have actual, full knowledge of the right to effective communication. The waiver is subject to the approval of counsel, if any, to the person who is deaf, hard of hearing, or deafblind and is also subject to the approval of the appointing authority. In no event is the failure of the person who is deaf, hard of hearing, or deafblind to request a qualified auxiliary service deemed a waiver of this right.   History. Source: L. 87: Entire part R&RE, p. 572, § 1, effective April 23. L. 2006: Entire section amended, p. 1090, § 8, effective May 25. L. 2018: Entire section amended,(HB 18-1108), ch. 303, p. 1835, § 7, effective August 8.
CO Code § 13-90-209 (2021)
2021 Colorado Code|Title 13 - Courts and Court Procedure|Article 90 - Witnesses|Part 2 - Appointment of Interpreters for Persons Who Are Deaf or Hard of Hearing|§ 13-90-209. Privileged Communications

 If a qualified interpreter is called upon to interpret privileged communications pursuant to section 13-90-107 , the interpreter shall not testify without the written consent of the person who holds the privilege.   History. Source: L. 87: Entire part R&RE, p. 572, § 1, effective April 23.
CO Code § 13-90-210 (2021)
2021 Colorado Code|Title 13 - Courts and Court Procedure|Article 90 - Witnesses|Part 2 - Appointment of Interpreters for Persons Who Are Deaf or Hard of Hearing|§ 13-90-210. Compensation

 Subject to the appropriations available to the commission, a qualified interpreter or computer-aided realtime translation reporter provided pursuant to section 13-90-204 shall be entitled to compensation for his or her services, including waiting time and necessary travel and subsistence expenses. The amount of compensation shall be based on a fee schedule for qualified interpreters and auxiliary services established by the commission.   History. Source: L. 87: Entire part R&RE, p. 572, § 1, effective April 23. L. 2006: Entire section amended, p. 1090, § 9, effective May 25.
CO Code § 13-93-102 (2021)
2021 Colorado Code|Title 13 - Courts and Court Procedure|Article 93 - Attorneys-at-Law|Part 1 - General Provisions|§ 13-93-102. No Discrimination - Issuance of License

 A person shall not deny an individual a license to practice on account of race, creed, color, religion, disability, age, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, gender expression, marital status, national origin, or ancestry.   History. Source: L. 2017: Entire article added with relocations,(SB 17-227), ch. 192, p. 699, § 1, effective August 9. L. 2021: Entire section amended,(HB 21-1108), ch. 156, p. 891, § 19, effective September 7.    Editor's note:   This section is similar to former § 12-5-102 as it existed prior to 2017.   Cross references:   For the legislative declaration in HB 21-1108, see section 1 of chapter 156, Session Laws of Colorado 2021.   ANNOTATION   For a case relating to the admission of women to practice decided prior to the specific provision of this section, see In re Thomas, 16 Colo. 441 , 27 P. 707 (1891).
CO Code § 13-93-103 (2021)
2021 Colorado Code|Title 13 - Courts and Court Procedure|Article 93 - Attorneys-at-Law|Part 1 - General Provisions|§ 13-93-103. License Fee

 The license fee for admission to practice law in this state shall be as prescribed by the supreme court under rules for admission to the bar.   History. Source: L. 2017: Entire article added with relocations,(SB 17-227), ch. 192, p. 699, § 1, effective August 9.    Editor's note:   This section is similar to former § 12-5-103 as it existed prior to 2017.
CO Code § 13-93-104 (2021)
2021 Colorado Code|Title 13 - Courts and Court Procedure|Article 93 - Attorneys-at-Law|Part 1 - General Provisions|§ 13-93-104. Clerk of Supreme Court Keeps Roll of Attorneys

 It is the duty of the clerk of the supreme court to make and keep a roll or record of the persons who have been regularly licensed and admitted to practice as attorneys- and counselors-at-law within this state and who have taken the prescribed oath.   History. Source: L. 2017: Entire article added with relocations,(SB 17-227), ch. 192, p. 699, § 1, effective August 9.    Editor's note:   This section is similar to former § 12-5-107 as it existed prior to 2017.   ANNOTATION   Law reviews. For note, “Rural Poverty and the Law in Southern Colorado”, see 47 Den. L.J. 82 (1970).
CO Code § 13-93-106 (2021)
2021 Colorado Code|Title 13 - Courts and Court Procedure|Article 93 - Attorneys-at-Law|Part 1 - General Provisions|§ 13-93-106. Persons Forbidden to Practice

 No coroner, sheriff, deputy sheriff, or jailer, though qualified, shall be permitted to practice as an attorney in the county in which he or she is commissioned or appointed, nor shall any clerk of the supreme court or district court be permitted to practice as an attorney- or counselor-at-law in the court in which he or she is clerk.   History. Source: L. 2017: Entire article added with relocations,(SB 17-227), ch. 192, p. 699, § 1, effective August 9.    Editor's note:   This section is similar to former § 12-5-109 as it existed prior to 2017.
CO Code § 13-93-107 (2021)
2021 Colorado Code|Title 13 - Courts and Court Procedure|Article 93 - Attorneys-at-Law|Part 1 - General Provisions|§ 13-93-107. Judge Not to Act as Attorney

 It is unlawful for judges of the district, county, and municipal courts to counsel or advise in or write any petition or answer or other pleadings in any proceeding, or to perform any service as attorney- or counselor-at-law, or to be interested in any profits or emoluments arising out of any practice in any of said courts, except costs in their own courts; except that county judges in counties of such classes as may be specified by the laws relating to county courts, if licensed attorneys, may practice in courts other than the county court and in matters that have not come before the county court; and further, municipal judges, if licensed attorneys, may practice in courts other than the municipal court and in matters that have not come before the municipal court.   History. Source: L. 2017: Entire article added with relocations,(SB 17-227), ch. 192, p. 699, § 1, effective August 9.    Editor's note:   This section is similar to former § 12-5-110 as it existed prior to 2017.   ANNOTATION   Annotator's note. Since § 13-93-107 is similar to former § 12-5-110 and laws antecedent to that section, relevant cases construing those provisions have been included in the annotations to this section.   The appearance of a judge for one of the parties in an election contest before the general assembly is not a violation of this section. Such appearance does not constitute practicing law. People ex rel. Colo. Bar Ass'n v. Class, 70 Colo. 381 , 201 P. 883 (1921); People ex rel. Colo. Bar Ass'n v. Class, 70 Colo. 381 , 201 P. 883 (1921).   Judges may not express opinions on legal questions not judicially before them, in view of this section. Laizure v. Baker, 91 Colo. 292 , 14 P.2d 486 (1932).   This section was not repealed by the declaratory judgment act. Gabriel v. Bd. of Regents of Univ. of Colo., 83 Colo. 582 , 267 P. 407 (1928); City & County of Denver v. Lynch, 92 Colo. 102 , 18 P.2d 907 (1932).   The trial court judge of a criminal action is in no sense a proper party to an appeal of the criminal action to the supreme court of Colorado. People v. Hopkins, 70 Colo. 163 , 197 P. 1020 (1921).   The brief submitted by such judge is considered by the court solely as amicus curiae. People v. Hopkins, 70 Colo. 163 , 197 P. 1020 (1921).
CO Code § 13-93-109 (2021)
2021 Colorado Code|Title 13 - Courts and Court Procedure|Article 93 - Attorneys-at-Law|Part 1 - General Provisions|§ 13-93-109. Special Admission of Counselors From Other States

 Whenever any counselor-at-law residing in any of the adjacent states or territories has business in any of the courts of this state, he or she may be admitted, on motion, for the purpose of transacting such business and none other.   History. Source: L. 2017: Entire article added with relocations,(SB 17-227), ch. 192, p. 700, § 1, effective August 9.    Editor's note:   This section is similar to former § 12-5-113 as it existed prior to 2017.   ANNOTATION   Annotator's note. Since § 13-93-109 is similar to former § 12-1-18 , CRS 53, a relevant case construing that provision has been included in the annotations to this section.   Where an attorney from a sister state is admitted to the bar of Colorado for the purpose of representing a defendant in a trial for murder in the first degree, the fact that such counsel does not have an associate resident counsel with him in the case does not nullify the arraignment of defendant or his plea of not guilty. Martinez v. People, 134 Colo. 82 , 299 P.2d 510 (1956).   Where an attorney from a sister state is voluntarily chosen by a defendant to represent him, and the supreme court authorizes his admission to the Colorado bar for the purpose of conducting the defense, counsel has full power and authority to represent defendant. Martinez v. People, 134 Colo. 82 , 299 P.2d 510 (1956).
CO Code § 13-93-110 (2021)
2021 Colorado Code|Title 13 - Courts and Court Procedure|Article 93 - Attorneys-at-Law|Part 1 - General Provisions|§ 13-93-110. Notice of Charges - Time to Show Cause

 Every attorney, before his or her name is stricken off the roll, shall receive a written notice from the clerk of the supreme court stating distinctly the grounds of complaint or the charges exhibited against him or her, and after the notice he or she shall be heard in his or her defense and allowed reasonable time to collect and prepare testimony for his or her justification. Any attorney whose name, at any time, is stricken from the roll by order of the court shall be considered as though his or her name had never been written thereon until such time as the said justices, in open court, authorize him or her to sign or subscribe the same.   History. Source: L. 2017: Entire article added with relocations,(SB 17-227), ch. 192, p. 700, § 1, effective August 9.    Editor's note:   This section is similar to former § 12-5-114 as it existed prior to 2017.   ANNOTATION   Annotator's note. Since § 13-93-110 is similar to former § 12-5-114 and laws antecedent to that section, relevant cases construing those provisions have been included in the annotations to this section.   This section does not direct how such notice shall be served. In re Walkey, 26 Colo. 161 , 56 P. 576 (1899).   In the absence of specific directions regarding such service, any method adopted from which it appears that respondent received the required notice will be sufficient. In re Walkey, 26 Colo. 161 , 56 P. 576 (1899).   This section makes ample provision for restoring to the bar any attorney whose name may have been stricken from the roll by order of the supreme court. People ex rel. Elliott v. Green, 7 Colo. 237 , 3 P. 65 (1883).   The court has no power to restore the petitioner to the rolls until it be shown that restitution has been made to the client of the moneys detained. Ex parte Browne, 2 Colo. 553 (1875).   Evidence insufficient to warrant reinstatement to the bar. In re Petition of Howard, 178 Colo. 350 , 497 P.2d 1023 (1972).   Whether or not leniency shall be exercised, and how soon, must depend, to a great extent, on the respondent himself. People ex rel. Elliott v. Green, 7 Colo. 237 , 3 P. 65 (1883).
CO Code § 13-93-111 (2021)
2021 Colorado Code|Title 13 - Courts and Court Procedure|Article 93 - Attorneys-at-Law|Part 1 - General Provisions|§ 13-93-111. Solicitation of Accident Victims - Waiting Period - Definition

  Except as permitted by section 13-21-301 (3) or 10-3-1104 (1)(h), no person shall engage in solicitation for professional employment or for any release or covenant not to sue concerning personal injury or wrongful death from an individual with whom the person has no family or prior professional relationship unless the incident for which employment is sought occurred more than thirty days prior to the solicitation.    No person shall accept a referral for professional employment concerning personal injury or wrongful death from any person who engaged in solicitation of an individual with whom the person had no family or prior professional relationship unless the incident for which employment is sought occurred more than thirty days prior to the solicitation.    As used in this section, “solicitation” means an initial contact initiated in person, through any form of written communication, or by telephone, telegraph, or facsimile, any of which is directed to a specific individual, unless requested by the individual, a member of the individual's family, or the authorized representative of the individual. “Solicitation” shall not include radio, television, newspaper, or yellow pages advertisements.    Any agreement made in violation of this section is voidable at the option of the individual suffering the personal injury or death or the individual's personal or other authorized representative.     History. Source: L. 2017: Entire article added with relocations,(SB 17-227), ch. 192, p. 700, § 1, effective August 9.    Editor's note:   This section is similar to former § 12-5-115.5 as it existed prior to 2017.
CO Code § 13-93-112 (2021)
2021 Colorado Code|Title 13 - Courts and Court Procedure|Article 93 - Attorneys-at-Law|Part 1 - General Provisions|§ 13-93-112. Attorney Not to Be Surety

 No attorney- or counselor-at-law shall become surety in any bond or recognizance of any sheriff or coroner, in any bond or recognizance for the appearance of any person charged with any public offense, or upon any bond or recognizance authorized by any statute to be taken for the payment of any sum of money into court in default of the principal, without the consent of a judge of the district court first had approving said surety.   History. Source: L. 2017: Entire article added with relocations,(SB 17-227), ch. 192, p. 700, § 1, effective August 9.    Editor's note:   This section is similar to former § 12-5-117 as it existed prior to 2017.   ANNOTATION   Annotator's note. Since § 13-93-112 is similar to former § 12-5-117 and laws antecedent to that section, relevant cases construing those provisions have been included in the annotations to this section.   Where by leave of court, an attorney signs a certiorari bond as surety, he is estopped to deny his obligation on the ground that he was an attorney at the time of signing. Ullery v. Kokott, 15 Colo. App. 138, 61 P. 189 (1900).   Applied in Bottom v. People, 63 Colo. 114 , 164 P. 697 (1917).
CO Code § 13-93-113 (2021)
2021 Colorado Code|Title 13 - Courts and Court Procedure|Article 93 - Attorneys-at-Law|Part 1 - General Provisions|§ 13-93-113. Judge Not to Have Law Partner

 A judge shall not have a partner acting as attorney or counsel in any court in his or her judicial district, county, or precinct.   History. Source: L. 2017: Entire article added with relocations,(SB 17-227), ch. 192, p. 701, § 1, effective August 9.    Editor's note:   This section is similar to former § 12-5-118 as it existed prior to 2017.