reglab/housing_qa huggingface dataset:
OR Rev Stat § 136.427 (2021)
2021 Oregon Revised Statutes|Volume : 04 - Criminal Procedure, Crimes|Chapter 136 - Criminal Trials|Section 136.427 - Confessions; corroboration not required; notice; hearing.

(1) A confession alone is sufficient to warrant the conviction of the defendant without some other proof that the crime has been committed if: (a) The state files notice in accordance with subsection (3) of this section; (b) The defendant is charged with a crime listed in ORS 163A.005; (c) The victim of the crime is a vulnerable person; (d) The victim is incompetent to testify under ORS 40.310; (e) The confession is made to a peace officer or a federal officer, as those terms are defined in ORS 133.005, or to an individual conducting an investigation under ORS 430.745, while the officer or individual is acting in the course of official duty; and (f) The court finds that there is sufficient evidence to establish the trustworthiness of the confession. (2) In making the determination described in subsection (1)(f) of this section, the court shall consider the following factors, in addition to other factors the court considers important: (a) Whether there is evidence demonstrating the truthfulness of portions of the confession; (b) Whether the defendant had the opportunity to commit the crime; (c) The method of interrogation used to solicit the confession; and (d) Whether the defendant is a vulnerable person. (3) The state shall file notice of the intention to rely on this section within 60 days of the arraignment, or of the defendant’s entry of the initial plea on an accusatory instrument, whichever is sooner. The court shall grant the state an extension for good cause shown. (4) When the state files the notice described in subsection (3) of this section, the court shall conduct a hearing prior to trial. After the hearing, the court shall enter an order that indicates whether the confession alone is sufficient to warrant the conviction of the defendant without some other proof that the crime has been committed. (5) As used in this section: (a) "Activities of daily living" includes dressing, eating, toileting, bathing, exercising appropriate personal hygiene practices and moving from place to place. (b) "Vulnerable person" means: (A) A person under 18 years of age; (B) A person 65 years of age or older; (C) A person who meets the medical criteria for the receipt of services from a community program or facility as those terms are defined in ORS 430.735; (D) A person with a developmental disability as that term is defined in ORS 40.460 (18a)(d); or (E) A person who, as the result of a diagnosed medical condition, requires assistance in two or more activities of daily living. [2009 c.875 §2] Note: 136.427 was enacted into law by the Legislative Assembly but was not added to or made a part of ORS chapter 136 or any series therein by legislative action. See Preface to Oregon Revised Statutes for further explanation.
OR Rev Stat § 136.430 (2021)
2021 Oregon Revised Statutes|Volume : 04 - Criminal Procedure, Crimes|Chapter 136 - Criminal Trials|Section 136.430 - Civil laws of evidence in criminal trials; exceptions.

The law of evidence in civil actions is also the law of evidence in criminal actions and proceedings, except as otherwise specifically provided in the statutes relating to crimes and criminal procedure. [Formerly 136.510]
OR Rev Stat § 136.432 (2021)
2021 Oregon Revised Statutes|Volume : 04 - Criminal Procedure, Crimes|Chapter 136 - Criminal Trials|Section 136.432 - Limitation on court’s authority to exclude relevant evidence.

A court may not exclude relevant and otherwise admissible evidence in a criminal action on the grounds that it was obtained in violation of any statutory provision unless exclusion of the evidence is required by: (1) The United States Constitution or the Oregon Constitution; (2) The rules of evidence governing privileges and the admission of hearsay; or (3) The rights of the press. [1997 c.313 §1] Note: 136.432 was enacted into law by the Legislative Assembly but was not added to or made a part of ORS chapter 136 or any series therein by legislative action. See Preface to Oregon Revised Statutes for further explanation.
OR Rev Stat § 136.435 (2021)
2021 Oregon Revised Statutes|Volume : 04 - Criminal Procedure, Crimes|Chapter 136 - Criminal Trials|Section 136.435 - Admissibility of evidence from felony defendant not informed as required under ORS 135.070.

Evidence obtained directly or indirectly as a result of failure of a magistrate to comply with ORS 135.070 shall not be admissible, over the objection of the defendant, in any court. [Formerly 136.545]
OR Rev Stat § 136.437 (2021)
2021 Oregon Revised Statutes|Volume : 04 - Criminal Procedure, Crimes|Chapter 136 - Criminal Trials|Section 136.437 - Use of evidence in prosecution of prostitution offense.

(1) If a person contacts an emergency communications system or a law enforcement agency to report the commission of a person felony, any statements or other evidence relating to the crime of prostitution under ORS 167.007 obtained as a result of the person making the report may not be used in the prosecution of the person for prostitution or attempted prostitution. (2) The prohibition on the use of statements or other evidence described in this section does not apply to evidence relating to a criminal offense other than prostitution, or to the prosecution of an offense other than prostitution or attempted prostitution. (3) As used in this section: (a) "Emergency communications system" has the meaning given that term in ORS 403.105. (b) "Person felony" has the meaning given that term in the rules of the Oregon Criminal Justice Commission. [2019 c.179 §1] Note: 136.437 was enacted into law by the Legislative Assembly but was not added to or made a part of ORS chapter 136 or any series therein by legislative action. See Preface to Oregon Revised Statutes for further explanation.
OR Rev Stat § 136.440 (2021)
2021 Oregon Revised Statutes|Volume : 04 - Criminal Procedure, Crimes|Chapter 136 - Criminal Trials|Section 136.440 - Testimony of accomplice; corroboration; "accomplice" defined.

(1) A conviction cannot be had upon the testimony of an accomplice unless it is corroborated by other evidence that tends to connect the defendant with the commission of the offense. The corroboration is not sufficient if it merely shows the commission of the offense or the circumstances of the commission. (2) As used in this section, an "accomplice" means a witness in a criminal action who, according to the evidence adduced in the action, is criminally liable for the conduct of the defendant under ORS 161.155 and 161.165, or, if the witness is a juvenile, has committed a delinquent act, which, if committed by an adult, would make the adult criminally liable for the conduct of the defendant. [Formerly 136.550]
OR Rev Stat § 136.445 (2021)
2021 Oregon Revised Statutes|Volume : 04 - Criminal Procedure, Crimes|Chapter 136 - Criminal Trials|Section 136.445 - Motion for acquittal; standard for granting motion; effect.

In any criminal action the defendant may, after close of the state’s evidence or of all the evidence, move the court for a judgment of acquittal. The court shall grant the motion if the evidence introduced theretofore is such as would not support a verdict against the defendant. The acquittal shall be a bar to another prosecution for the same offense. [Formerly 136.605]
OR Rev Stat § 136.447 (2021)
2021 Oregon Revised Statutes|Volume : 04 - Criminal Procedure, Crimes|Chapter 136 - Criminal Trials|Section 136.447 - Medical records.

Medical records may be obtained by subpoena as provided in ORCP 55 H and shall be sent only to the court or the clerk of the court before which the matter is pending. In relation to grand jury proceedings, notice need not be given as required in ORCP 55 H and the medical records shall be sent only to the grand jury. [1995 c.196 §2] Note: ORCP 55 was repealed and replaced by the Council on Court Procedures Amendments promulgated on December 8, 2018, and effective January 1, 2020. The text of 136.447 was not amended by enactment of the Legislative Assembly to reflect the repeal. Editorial adjustment of 136.447 for the repeal of ORCP 55 has not been made. See the ORCP 55 Cross-Reference Chart available from the Council on Court Procedures.
OR Rev Stat § 136.450 (2021)
2021 Oregon Revised Statutes|Volume : 04 - Criminal Procedure, Crimes|Chapter 136 - Criminal Trials|Section 136.450 - Number of jurors required for verdict.

(1) A jury in a criminal action may render a verdict of guilty only by unanimous agreement. (2) A jury in a criminal action may render a verdict of not guilty only by a concurrence of at least 10 of 12 jurors. [Formerly 136.610; 1997 c.313 §25; 2019 c.635 §8; 2021 c.478 §11]
OR Rev Stat § 136.455 (2021)
2021 Oregon Revised Statutes|Volume : 04 - Criminal Procedure, Crimes|Chapter 136 - Criminal Trials|Section 136.455 - General verdict on plea of not guilty.

A general verdict upon a plea of not guilty is either "guilty," of an offense charged in the accusatory instrument, or "not guilty." [Formerly 136.620]
OR Rev Stat § 136.460 (2021)
2021 Oregon Revised Statutes|Volume : 04 - Criminal Procedure, Crimes|Chapter 136 - Criminal Trials|Section 136.460 - Verdict where crime consists of degrees; lesser included offenses.

(1) Upon a charge for a crime consisting of different degrees, the jury may find the defendant not guilty of the degree charged in the accusatory instrument and guilty of any degree inferior thereto or of an attempt to commit the crime or any such inferior degree thereof. (2) The jury shall first consider the charged offense. Only if the jury finds the defendant not guilty of the charged offense may the jury consider a lesser included offense. If there is more than one lesser included offense, the jury shall consider the lesser included offenses in order of seriousness. The jury may consider a less serious lesser included offense only after finding the defendant not guilty of any more serious lesser included offenses. (3) When a jury finds a defendant guilty of a lesser included offense, the court, upon a request by the state or defendant, shall poll the jury on the original charge. If fewer than the required number of jurors vote to find the defendant not guilty on the original charge, the court shall not receive the verdict and shall instruct the jury to continue deliberations. (4) If the jury is unable to reach a decision on the original charge, the state and defendant may stipulate that the jury may consider any lesser included offense. [Formerly 136.650; 1997 c.511 §1]
OR Rev Stat § 136.465 (2021)
2021 Oregon Revised Statutes|Volume : 04 - Criminal Procedure, Crimes|Chapter 136 - Criminal Trials|Section 136.465 - Verdict where crime or attempt included within charge.

In all cases, the defendant may be found guilty of any crime the commission of which is necessarily included in that with which the defendant is charged in the accusatory instrument or of an attempt to commit such crime. [Formerly 136.660]
OR Rev Stat § 136.470 (2021)
2021 Oregon Revised Statutes|Volume : 04 - Criminal Procedure, Crimes|Chapter 136 - Criminal Trials|Section 136.470 - Conviction or acquittal of one or more of several defendants.

Upon an accusatory instrument against several defendants, any one or more may be convicted or acquitted. [Formerly 136.670]
OR Rev Stat § 136.475 (2021)
2021 Oregon Revised Statutes|Volume : 04 - Criminal Procedure, Crimes|Chapter 136 - Criminal Trials|Section 136.475 - Verdict as to some of several defendants; retrial of others.

Upon an accusatory instrument against several defendants, if the jury cannot agree upon a verdict as to all, it may give a verdict as to those in regard to whom it does agree, on which a judgment shall be given accordingly. The case as to the rest of the defendants may be tried by another jury. [Formerly 136.680]
OR Rev Stat § 136.480 (2021)
2021 Oregon Revised Statutes|Volume : 04 - Criminal Procedure, Crimes|Chapter 136 - Criminal Trials|Section 136.480 - Reconsideration of verdict when jury makes mistake as to law.

When a verdict is found in which it appears to the court that the jury has mistaken the law, the court may explain the reason for that opinion and direct the jury to reconsider its verdict; but if after such reconsideration the jury finds the same verdict, it must be received. [Formerly 136.690]
OR Rev Stat § 136.485 (2021)
2021 Oregon Revised Statutes|Volume : 04 - Criminal Procedure, Crimes|Chapter 136 - Criminal Trials|Section 136.485 - Reconsideration of verdict which is not general verdict.

If the jury finds a verdict which is not a general verdict, the court may, with proper instructions as to the law, direct the jury to reconsider it; and the verdict cannot be received until it is given in some form from which it can be clearly understood that the intent of the jury is to render a general verdict. [Formerly 136.700]
OR Rev Stat § 136.490 (2021)
2021 Oregon Revised Statutes|Volume : 04 - Criminal Procedure, Crimes|Chapter 136 - Criminal Trials|Section 136.490 - Discharge of defendant upon acquittal; exception.

If judgment of acquittal is given on a general verdict and the defendant is not detained for any other legal cause, the defendant shall be discharged as soon as the judgment is given, except that, when the acquittal is for variance between the proof and the accusatory instrument, which may be obviated by a new accusatory instrument, the court may order the detention of the defendant, to the end that a new accusatory instrument may be preferred, in the same manner and with like effect, as provided in ORS 135.540. [Formerly 136.710]
OR Rev Stat § 136.495 (2021)
2021 Oregon Revised Statutes|Volume : 04 - Criminal Procedure, Crimes|Chapter 136 - Criminal Trials|Section 136.495 - Proceedings after adverse general verdict.

If a general verdict against the defendant is given, the defendant shall be remanded, if in custody; if the defendant has been released, the defendant may be committed to await the judgment of the court upon the verdict. When committed, the release agreement of the defendant is exonerated or, if the defendant has deposited money in lieu of a release agreement, it shall be refunded to the defendant. [Formerly 136.720]
OR Rev Stat § 136.500 (2021)
2021 Oregon Revised Statutes|Volume : 04 - Criminal Procedure, Crimes|Chapter 136 - Criminal Trials|Section 136.500 - Motion in arrest of judgment; basis and time for making.

A motion in arrest of judgment is an application on the part of the defendant that no judgment be rendered on a plea or verdict of guilty. It may be founded on either or both of the grounds specified in ORS 135.630 (1) and (4), and not otherwise. The motion must be made within the time allowed to file a motion for a new trial, and both such motions may be made and heard as the court directs. [Formerly 136.810]
OR Rev Stat § 136.505 (2021)
2021 Oregon Revised Statutes|Volume : 04 - Criminal Procedure, Crimes|Chapter 136 - Criminal Trials|Section 136.505 - Effect of allowance of motion.

The effect of allowing a motion in arrest of judgment is to place the defendant in the same situation in which the defendant was before indictment was found. [Formerly 136.820]
OR Rev Stat § 136.510 (2021)
2021 Oregon Revised Statutes|Volume : 04 - Criminal Procedure, Crimes|Chapter 136 - Criminal Trials|Section 136.510

[Amended by 1973 c.836 §237; renumbered 136.430]
OR Rev Stat § 136.515 (2021)
2021 Oregon Revised Statutes|Volume : 04 - Criminal Procedure, Crimes|Chapter 136 - Criminal Trials|Section 136.515 - Order when evidence shows guilt; new accusatory instrument.

If, from the evidence given on the trial, there is reasonable ground to believe the defendant guilty and a new accusatory instrument can be framed upon which the defendant may be convicted, the court shall order the defendant to be recommitted to custody or released and to answer the new accusatory instrument, if one is found; and if the evidence shows the defendant to be guilty of another offense than that charged in the accusatory instrument, the defendant shall in like manner be committed or held thereon. In neither case is the verdict a bar to another action for the same crime. [Formerly 136.830]
OR Rev Stat § 136.520 (2021)
2021 Oregon Revised Statutes|Volume : 04 - Criminal Procedure, Crimes|Chapter 136 - Criminal Trials|Section 136.520

[Renumbered 136.415]
OR Rev Stat § 136.525 (2021)
2021 Oregon Revised Statutes|Volume : 04 - Criminal Procedure, Crimes|Chapter 136 - Criminal Trials|Section 136.525 - Order when evidence is insufficient; acquittal.

If the evidence appears insufficient to charge the defendant with any offense, the defendant shall, if in custody, be discharged or, if the defendant has been released or deposited money in lieu thereof, the release agreement of the defendant is exonerated or the money of the defendant shall be refunded to the defendant; and in such case, the arrest of judgment operates as an acquittal of the charge upon which the accusatory instrument was founded. [Formerly 136.840]
OR Rev Stat § 136.530 (2021)
2021 Oregon Revised Statutes|Volume : 04 - Criminal Procedure, Crimes|Chapter 136 - Criminal Trials|Section 136.530

[Renumbered 136.420]
OR Rev Stat § 136.535 (2021)
2021 Oregon Revised Statutes|Volume : 04 - Criminal Procedure, Crimes|Chapter 136 - Criminal Trials|Section 136.535 - New trial; application of ORCP 64 F to motion in arrest of judgment.

(1) Except that a new trial may not be granted on application of the state, ORS 19.430 and ORCP 64 A, B and D to G apply to and regulate new trials in criminal actions. (2) The provisions of ORCP 64 F governing motions for a new trial apply to and regulate motions in arrest of judgment in criminal actions. [Formerly 136.851; 1979 c.284 §114; 2003 c.288 §1; 2009 c.112 §1]
OR Rev Stat § 136.540 (2021)
2021 Oregon Revised Statutes|Volume : 04 - Criminal Procedure, Crimes|Chapter 136 - Criminal Trials|Section 136.540

[Amended by 1957 c.567 §1; renumbered 136.425]
OR Rev Stat § 136.545 (2021)
2021 Oregon Revised Statutes|Volume : 04 - Criminal Procedure, Crimes|Chapter 136 - Criminal Trials|Section 136.545

[1963 c.511 §2; 1973 c.836 §238; renumbered 136.435]
OR Rev Stat § 136.550 (2021)
2021 Oregon Revised Statutes|Volume : 04 - Criminal Procedure, Crimes|Chapter 136 - Criminal Trials|Section 136.550

[Amended by 1973 c.836 §239; renumbered 136.440]
OR Rev Stat § 136.555 (2021)
2021 Oregon Revised Statutes|Volume : 04 - Criminal Procedure, Crimes|Chapter 136 - Criminal Trials|Section 136.555 - Subpoena defined.

The process by which the attendance of a witness before a court or magistrate is required is a subpoena. [Formerly 139.010]
OR Rev Stat § 136.557 (2021)
2021 Oregon Revised Statutes|Volume : 04 - Criminal Procedure, Crimes|Chapter 136 - Criminal Trials|Section 136.557 - Issuance of subpoena by magistrate for witnesses at preliminary examination.

A magistrate before whom an information is laid or complaint made may issue subpoenas subscribed by the magistrate for witnesses within the state, either on behalf of the state or of the defendant. [Formerly 139.020]
OR Rev Stat § 136.563 (2021)
2021 Oregon Revised Statutes|Volume : 04 - Criminal Procedure, Crimes|Chapter 136 - Criminal Trials|Section 136.563 - Issuance of subpoena by district attorney for witnesses before grand jury.

The district attorney may issue subpoenas subscribed by the district attorney for witnesses within the state in support of the prosecution or for such other witnesses as the grand jury directs to appear before the grand jury upon an investigation pending before it. [Formerly 139.030]
OR Rev Stat § 136.565 (2021)
2021 Oregon Revised Statutes|Volume : 04 - Criminal Procedure, Crimes|Chapter 136 - Criminal Trials|Section 136.565 - Issuance of subpoena by district attorney for witnesses at trial.

The district attorney may issue subpoenas subscribed by the district attorney for not to exceed 10 witnesses within the state in support of an indictment to appear before the court at which it is to be tried. [Formerly 139.040]
OR Rev Stat § 136.567 (2021)
2021 Oregon Revised Statutes|Volume : 04 - Criminal Procedure, Crimes|Chapter 136 - Criminal Trials|Section 136.567 - Issuance of subpoena for witnesses for defendant; bar to dismissal.

(1) A defendant in a criminal action is entitled, at the expense of the state or city, to have subpoenas issued for not to exceed 10 witnesses within the state. A defendant is entitled, at the expense of the defendant, to have subpoenas issued for any number of additional witnesses without an order of the court. The defendant is responsible for the costs of serving the subpoenas and for the costs, as provided in ORS 136.602, of witness per diem and mileage and for expenses allowed under ORS 136.603. (2) Any subpoena that a defendant in a criminal action is entitled to have issued shall be issued: (a) Upon application of the defendant, by the clerk of the court in which the criminal action is pending for trial, and in blank, under the seal of the court and subscribed by the clerk; or (b) By an attorney of record of the defendant, and subscribed by the attorney. (3) A prosecution for violation of ORS 813.010 may not be dismissed based solely on the unavailability of a witness who was subpoenaed by the defendant to provide testimony with respect to an instrument that was used to test a person’s breath, blood or urine to determine the alcoholic content of the person’s blood. This subsection does not apply to the subpoena of an officer or employee of a public body, as defined in ORS 174.109. [Formerly 139.050; 1977 c.746 §4; 1981 c.174 §1; 1987 c.606 §2; 1989 c.171 §17; 2007 c.581 §3]
OR Rev Stat § 136.570 (2021)
2021 Oregon Revised Statutes|Volume : 04 - Criminal Procedure, Crimes|Chapter 136 - Criminal Trials|Section 136.570 - Application for subpoenas for more than 10 witnesses.

If either party in a criminal action desires more than 10 witnesses, as provided in ORS 136.565 and 136.567, application therefor shall be made to the court or judge thereof by motion for an order allowing the issuance of subpoenas for such additional witnesses, which motion shall be supported either by the statement of the district attorney or city attorney in writing or by the affidavit of the defendant. The statement or affidavit shall state the names of such witnesses, their places of residence and the facts expected to be proved by each of them. The court or judge thereof shall make an order allowing the issuance of subpoenas for so many of such witnesses as appear from such statement or affidavit to be necessary and material to a fair, full and impartial trial. [Formerly 139.060; 1977 c.746 §5]
OR Rev Stat § 136.580 (2021)
2021 Oregon Revised Statutes|Volume : 04 - Criminal Procedure, Crimes|Chapter 136 - Criminal Trials|Section 136.580 - Subpoenas when books, papers or documents are required.

(1) If books, papers or documents are required, a direction to the following effect shall be added to the form provided in ORS 136.575: "And you are required, also, to bring with you the following: (describing intelligibly the books, papers or documents required)." (2) Upon the motion of the state or the defendant, the court may direct that the books, papers or documents described in the subpoena be produced before the court prior to the trial or prior to the time when the books, papers or documents are to be offered in evidence and may, upon production, permit the books, papers or documents to be inspected and copied by the state or the defendant and the state’s or the defendant’s attorneys. [Formerly 139.080; 1993 c.304 §1]
OR Rev Stat § 136.585 (2021)
2021 Oregon Revised Statutes|Volume : 04 - Criminal Procedure, Crimes|Chapter 136 - Criminal Trials|Section 136.585 - By whom subpoena is served.

A subpoena may be served by the defendant or any other person over 18 years of age and shall be served by any sheriff or constable within the county or district of the sheriff or constable, as the case may be, when delivered to the sheriff or constable for service, either on the part of the prosecution or of the defendant. [Formerly 139.090; 1977 c.746 §7]