reglab/housing_qa huggingface dataset:
IN Code § 35-33-5-7 (2021)
2021 Indiana Code|Title 35. Criminal Law and Procedure|Article 33. Preliminary Proceedings|Chapter 5. Search and Seizure|35-33-5-7. Execution of Search Warrant; Forcible Entry; Wrongful Entry; Recovery of Damages

Sec. 7. (a) A search warrant issued by a court of record may be executed according to its terms anywhere in the state. A search warrant issued by a court that is not a court of record may be executed according to its terms anywhere in the county of the issuing court.(b) Except as provided in subsection (f), a search warrant must be:(1) executed not more than ten (10) days after the date of issuance; and(2) returned to the court without unnecessary delay after the execution.(c) A search warrant may be executed:(1) on any day of the week; and(2) at any time of the day or night.(d) A law enforcement officer may break open any outer or inner door or window in order to execute a search warrant, if the officer is not admitted following an announcement of the officer's authority and purpose.(e) A person or persons whose property is wrongfully damaged or whose person is wrongfully injured by any law enforcement officer or officers who wrongfully enter may recover such damage from the responsible authority and the law enforcement officer or officers as the court may determine. The action may be filed in the circuit court or superior court in the county where the wrongful entry took place.(f) Notwithstanding section 4 of this chapter, a warrant authorizing a search, testing, or other analysis of an item, tangible or intangible, is deemed executed when the item is seized by a law enforcement officer. A return of a warrant authorizing a search, testing, or other analysis of an item is sufficient if the return contains a statement indicating that the item was seized by a law enforcement officer.As added by Acts 1981, P.L.298, SEC.2. Amended by P.L.320-1983, SEC.7; P.L.201-2011, SEC.111; P.L.63-2020, SEC.1.
IN Code § 35-33-5-8 (2021)
2021 Indiana Code|Title 35. Criminal Law and Procedure|Article 33. Preliminary Proceedings|Chapter 5. Search and Seizure|35-33-5-8. Issue of Warrant Without Affidavit; Types of Sworn Testimony; Procedures; Perjury

Sec. 8. (a) A judge may issue a search or arrest warrant without the affidavit required under section 2 of this chapter, if the judge receives testimony subject to the penalties for perjury of the same facts required for an affidavit:(1) in a nonadversarial, recorded hearing before the judge;(2) orally by telephone or radio;(3) in writing by facsimile transmission (FAX); or(4) in writing by electronic mail or other electronic transmission.(b) If a warrant is issued under subsection (a)(1), the judge shall order the court reporter to type or transcribe the testimony from the hearing for entry in the record. The judge shall then certify the transcript.(c) After reciting the facts required for an affidavit and verifying the facts recited under penalty of perjury, an applicant for a warrant under subsection (a)(2) shall read to the judge from a warrant form on which the applicant enters the information read by the applicant to the judge. The judge may direct the applicant to modify the warrant. If the judge agrees to issue the warrant, the judge shall direct the applicant to sign the judge's name to the warrant, adding the time of the issuance of the warrant.(d) After transmitting an affidavit, an applicant for a warrant under subsection (a)(3) or (a)(4) shall transmit to the judge a copy of a warrant form completed by the applicant. The judge may modify the transmitted warrant. If the judge agrees to issue the warrant, the judge shall sign, affix the date and time, and transmit to the applicant a duplicate of the warrant.(e) If a warrant is issued under subsection (a)(2), the judge shall record the conversation on audio tape and order the court reporter to type or transcribe the recording for entry in the record. The judge shall certify the audio tape, the transcription, and the warrant retained by the judge for entry in the record.(f) If a warrant is issued under subsection (a)(3), the facsimile copy of the affidavit and warrant sent to the judge shall be retained as if they were the originals. If a warrant is issued under subsection (a)(4), the electronically transmitted copy of the affidavit and warrant sent to the judge shall be printed and retained as if they were the originals.(g) The court reporter shall notify the applicant who received a warrant under subsection (a)(1) or (a)(2) when the transcription required under this section is entered in the record. The applicant shall sign the transcribed entry upon receiving notice from the court reporter.(h) The affiant and the judge may use an electronic signature on the affidavit and warrant. An electronic signature may be indicated by "s/Affiant's Name" or "s/Judge's Name" or by any other electronic means that identifies the affiant or judge and indicates that the affiant or judge adopts the contents of the document to which the electronic signature is affixed.As added by P.L.161-1990, SEC.2. Amended by P.L.170-2014, SEC.18.
IN Code § 35-33-5-9 (2021)
2021 Indiana Code|Title 35. Criminal Law and Procedure|Article 33. Preliminary Proceedings|Chapter 5. Search and Seizure|35-33-5-9. Unmanned Aerial Vehicles; Search Warrant; Exceptions

Sec. 9. A law enforcement officer must obtain a search warrant in order to use an unmanned aerial vehicle:(1) on or over private property; or(2) to conduct a search, perform surveillance, obtain a photograph, or obtain video of private property or of individuals, items, or structures located on private property;without the consent of the owner of the affected private property. However, a warrant is not required for a use of an unmanned aerial vehicle if a warrant would not be required for a search not using an unmanned aerial vehicle.As added by P.L.170-2014, SEC.19. Amended by P.L.57-2016, SEC.2; P.L.136-2019, SEC.1.
IN Code § 35-33-5-10 (2021)
2021 Indiana Code|Title 35. Criminal Law and Procedure|Article 33. Preliminary Proceedings|Chapter 5. Search and Seizure|35-33-5-10. Admissibility of Evidence; Unmanned Aerial Vehicles

Sec. 10. The following are not admissible as evidence in an administrative or judicial proceeding:(1) A communication or an image that is obtained through the use of an unmanned aerial vehicle in violation of section 9 of this chapter.(2) Evidence derived from a communication or an image described in subdivision (1).As added by P.L.170-2014, SEC.20.
IN Code § 35-33-5-11 (2021)
2021 Indiana Code|Title 35. Criminal Law and Procedure|Article 33. Preliminary Proceedings|Chapter 5. Search and Seizure|35-33-5-11. Electronic User Data Held in Electronic Storage

Sec. 11. (a) This subsection does not apply to electronic or video toll collection facilities or activities authorized under any of the following:(1) IC 8-15-2.(2) IC 8-15-3.(3) IC 8-15.5.(4) IC 8-15.7.(5) IC 8-16.(6) IC 9-21-3.5.A law enforcement officer may not compel a user to provide a passkey, password, or keycode to any electronic communication service, electronic device, or electronic storage, or any form of stored electronic user data, without a valid search warrant issued by a judge using search warrant procedures.(b) A judge may issue a court order under this section for electronic user data held in electronic storage, including the records and information related to a wire communication or electronic communication held in electronic storage, by a provider of an electronic communication service or a provider of a remote computing service regardless of whether the user data is held at a location in Indiana or at a location in another state.(c) A judge may issue a court order under this section on a service provider that is a corporation or entity that is incorporated or organized under the laws of Indiana or a company or business entity doing business in Indiana under a contract or terms of a service agreement with an Indiana resident. The service provider shall produce all information sought, as required by the court order.(d) Any Indiana corporation that provides electronic communication services or remote computing services to the public shall comply with a valid court order issued in another state that is seeking the information described in this section, if the court order is served on the corporation.As added by P.L.170-2014, SEC.21.
IN Code § 35-33-5-12 (2021)
2021 Indiana Code|Title 35. Criminal Law and Procedure|Article 33. Preliminary Proceedings|Chapter 5. Search and Seizure|35-33-5-12. Use of Real Time Tracking Instruments; Geolocation Information

Sec. 12. (a) A law enforcement officer or law enforcement agency may not use a real time tracking instrument that is capable of obtaining geolocation information concerning a cellular device or a device connected to a cellular network unless:(1) the law enforcement officer or law enforcement agency has obtained an order issued by a court based upon a finding of probable cause to use the tracking instrument; or(2) exigent circumstances exist that necessitate using the tracking instrument without first obtaining a court order.(b) If a law enforcement officer or law enforcement agency uses a real time tracking instrument described in subsection (a) based upon the existence of exigent circumstances, the law enforcement officer or law enforcement agency shall seek to obtain an order issued by a court based upon a finding of probable cause not later than seventy-two (72) hours after the initial use of the real time tracking instrument.As added by P.L.170-2014, SEC.22.
IN Code § 35-33-5-13 (2021)
2021 Indiana Code|Title 35. Criminal Law and Procedure|Article 33. Preliminary Proceedings|Chapter 5. Search and Seizure|35-33-5-13. Immunity From Civil or Criminal Liability

Sec. 13. An electronic communication service, remote computing service, and geolocation information service are immune from civil or criminal liability for providing information or evidence as required by a court order under this chapter.As added by P.L.170-2014, SEC.23.
IN Code § 35-33-5-14 (2021)
2021 Indiana Code|Title 35. Criminal Law and Procedure|Article 33. Preliminary Proceedings|Chapter 5. Search and Seizure|35-33-5-14. Notice to News Media Concerning Search Warrants

Sec. 14. (a) For purposes of IC 34-46-4 (Journalist's Privilege Against Disclosure of Information Source) and subject to subsection (b), if:(1) a governmental entity requests that a court issue a search warrant to a provider of:(A) electronic communication service; or(B) remote computing service; and(2) the search warrant seeks information or communications concerning a news media entity or a person otherwise described in IC 34-46-4-1;the news media entity or person described in IC 34-46-4-1 shall be given reasonable and timely notice of the search warrant request and shall be given an opportunity to be heard by the court concerning the issuance of the search warrant before the search warrant is issued.(b) If:(1) the search warrant that would be issued to a provider described in subsection (a)(1) concerns a criminal investigation in which the news media entity or person described in IC 34-46-4-1 is a target of the criminal investigation; and(2) the notice that would be provided to the news media entity or person described in IC 34-46-4-1 under subsection (a) would pose a clear and substantial threat to the integrity of the criminal investigation;the governmental entity shall certify the threat to the court and notice of the search warrant shall be given to the news media entity or person described in IC 34-46-4-1 as soon as the court determines that the notice no longer poses a clear and substantial threat to the integrity of the criminal investigation.As added by P.L.170-2014, SEC.24.
IN Code § 35-33-6-2 (2021)
2021 Indiana Code|Title 35. Criminal Law and Procedure|Article 33. Preliminary Proceedings|Chapter 6. Detention of Shoplifters by Owner or Agent|35-33-6-2. Probable Cause; Detention; Procedure; Statements by Juveniles

Sec. 2. (a) An owner or agent of a store who has probable cause to believe that a theft has occurred or is occurring on or about the store and who has probable cause to believe that a specific person has committed or is committing the theft:(1) may:(A) detain the person and request the person to identify himself or herself;(B) verify the identification;(C) determine whether the person has in the person's possession unpurchased merchandise taken from the store;(D) inform the appropriate law enforcement officers; and(E) inform the person's parents or others interested in the person's welfare that the person has been detained; but(2) shall not ask the person to make a statement that acknowledges that the person committed the theft or conversion or waives any of the person's legal rights if:(A) the person is less than eighteen (18) years of age; and(B) the person has not been afforded an opportunity to have a meaningful consultation with his or her parent, guardian, custodian, or guardian ad litem.(b) A statement acknowledging that a child committed theft or conversion in violation of subdivision (a)(2) cannot be admitted as evidence against the child on the issue of whether the child committed a delinquent act or a crime.(c) The detention must:(1) be reasonable and last only for a reasonable time; and(2) not extend beyond the arrival of a law enforcement officer or two (2) hours, whichever first occurs.As added by Acts 1981, P.L.298, SEC.2. Amended by Acts 1982, P.L.204, SEC.11; P.L.77-2009, SEC.6.
IN Code § 35-33-6-2.5 (2021)
2021 Indiana Code|Title 35. Criminal Law and Procedure|Article 33. Preliminary Proceedings|Chapter 6. Detention of Shoplifters by Owner or Agent|35-33-6-2.5. Detention of Person Making Unlawful Recording

Sec. 2.5. (a) An owner or agent of a motion picture exhibition facility who has probable cause to believe that an unlawful recording under IC 35-46-8 has occurred or is occurring in the motion picture exhibition facility and who has probable cause to believe that a specific person has committed or is committing the unlawful recording may:(1) detain the person and request the person to provide identification;(2) verify the identification;(3) determine whether the person possesses at the time of detention an audiovisual recording device (as defined in IC 35-46-8-2);(4) confiscate any unauthorized copies of a motion picture or another audiovisual work; and(5) inform the appropriate law enforcement officer or agency that the person is being detained.(b) Detention under subsection (a):(1) must:(A) be reasonable; and(B) last only for a reasonable time; and(2) may not extend beyond the arrival of a law enforcement officer or two (2) hours, whichever occurs first.As added by P.L.94-2005, SEC.2.
IN Code § 35-33-6-3 (2021)
2021 Indiana Code|Title 35. Criminal Law and Procedure|Article 33. Preliminary Proceedings|Chapter 6. Detention of Shoplifters by Owner or Agent|35-33-6-3. Placement of Information Before Law Enforcement Officer; Presumption

Sec. 3. An owner or agent of a store or motion picture exhibition facility who informs a law enforcement officer of the circumstantial basis for detention and any additional relevant facts shall be presumed to be placing information before the law enforcement officer. The placing of this information does not constitute a charge of crime.As added by Acts 1981, P.L.298, SEC.2. Amended by P.L.94-2005, SEC.3.
IN Code § 35-33-6-4 (2021)
2021 Indiana Code|Title 35. Criminal Law and Procedure|Article 33. Preliminary Proceedings|Chapter 6. Detention of Shoplifters by Owner or Agent|35-33-6-4. Civil or Criminal Actions; Exclusion of Lawful Detention; Burden of Proof

Sec. 4. A civil or criminal action against:(1) an owner or agent of a store or motion picture exhibition facility; or(2) a law enforcement officer;may not be based on a detention that was lawful under section 2 or 2.5 of this chapter. However, the defendant has the burden of proof that the defendant acted with probable cause under section 2 or 2.5 of this chapter.As added by Acts 1981, P.L.298, SEC.2. Amended by P.L.94-2005, SEC.4.
IN Code § 35-33-6-5 (2021)
2021 Indiana Code|Title 35. Criminal Law and Procedure|Article 33. Preliminary Proceedings|Chapter 6. Detention of Shoplifters by Owner or Agent|35-33-6-5. Reliance on Information From Employee; Probable Cause

Sec. 5. An owner or agent of a store may act in the manner permitted by section 2 of this chapter on information received from any employee of the store, if that employee has probable cause to believe that a:(1) theft has occurred or is occurring in or about the store; and(2) specific person has committed or is committing the theft.As added by Acts 1981, P.L.298, SEC.2.
IN Code § 35-33-6-6 (2021)
2021 Indiana Code|Title 35. Criminal Law and Procedure|Article 33. Preliminary Proceedings|Chapter 6. Detention of Shoplifters by Owner or Agent|35-33-6-6. Reliance on Information From Employee of Motion Picture Exhibition Facility

Sec. 6. An owner or agent of a motion picture exhibition facility may act in the manner allowed by section 2.5 of this chapter on information received from an employee of the motion picture exhibition facility if the employee has probable cause to believe that:(1) an unlawful recording under IC 35-46-8 has occurred or is occurring in the motion picture exhibition facility; and(2) a specific person has committed or is committing the unlawful recording.As added by P.L.94-2005, SEC.5.
IN Code § 35-33-7-1 (2021)
2021 Indiana Code|Title 35. Criminal Law and Procedure|Article 33. Preliminary Proceedings|Chapter 7. Probable Cause; Initial Hearing|35-33-7-1. Arrest Without Warrant; Initial Hearing; Venue

Sec. 1. (a) A person arrested without a warrant for a crime shall be taken promptly before a judicial officer:(1) in the county in which the arrest is made; or(2) of any county believed to have venue over the offense committed; for an initial hearing in court.(b) Except as provided in subsection (c), if the person arrested makes bail before the person's initial hearing before a judicial officer, the initial hearing shall occur at any time within twenty (20) calendar days after the person's arrest.(c) If a person arrested under IC 9-30-5 makes bail before the person's initial hearing before a judicial officer, the initial hearing must occur within ten (10) calendar days after the person's arrest.As added by Acts 1981, P.L.298, SEC.2. Amended by P.L.126-1989, SEC.27; P.L.2-1991, SEC.103.
IN Code § 35-33-7-2 (2021)
2021 Indiana Code|Title 35. Criminal Law and Procedure|Article 33. Preliminary Proceedings|Chapter 7. Probable Cause; Initial Hearing|35-33-7-2. Probable Cause; Affidavit or Oral Presentation Under Oath; Record; Determination; Detention or Release

Sec. 2. (a) At or before the initial hearing of a person arrested without a warrant for a crime, the facts upon which the arrest was made shall be submitted to the judicial officer, ex parte, in a probable cause affidavit. In lieu of the affidavit or in addition to it, the facts may be submitted orally under oath to the judicial officer. If facts upon which the arrest was made are submitted orally, the proceeding shall be recorded by a court reporter, and, upon request of any party in the case or upon order of the court, the record of the proceeding shall be transcribed.(b) If the judicial officer determines that there is probable cause to believe that any crime was committed and that the arrested person committed it, the judicial officer shall order that the arrested person be held to answer in the proper court. If the facts submitted do not establish probable cause or if the prosecuting attorney informs the judicial officer on the record that no charge will be filed against the arrested person, the judicial officer shall order that the arrested person be released immediately.As added by Acts 1981, P.L.298, SEC.2. Amended by Acts 1982, P.L.204, SEC.12.
IN Code § 35-33-7-3 (2021)
2021 Indiana Code|Title 35. Criminal Law and Procedure|Article 33. Preliminary Proceedings|Chapter 7. Probable Cause; Initial Hearing|35-33-7-3. Filing of Indictment or Information; Recess or Continuation of Initial Hearing; Informing Accused of Rights

Sec. 3. (a) When a person is arrested for a crime before a formal charge has been filed, an information or indictment shall be filed or be prepared to be filed at or before the initial hearing, unless the prosecuting attorney has informed the court that there will be no charges filed in the case.(b) If the prosecuting attorney states that more time is required to evaluate the case and determine whether a charge should be filed, or if it is necessary to transfer the person to another court, then the court shall recess or continue the initial hearing for up to seventy-two (72) hours, excluding intervening Saturdays, Sundays, and legal holidays.(c) Before recessing the initial hearing and after the ex parte probable cause determination has been made, the court shall inform a defendant charged with a felony of the rights specified in subdivisions (1), (2), (3), (4), and (5) of section 5 of this chapter.As added by Acts 1981, P.L.298, SEC.2. Amended by Acts 1982, P.L.204, SEC.13; P.L.320-1983, SEC.8.
IN Code § 35-33-7-3.5 (2021)
2021 Indiana Code|Title 35. Criminal Law and Procedure|Article 33. Preliminary Proceedings|Chapter 7. Probable Cause; Initial Hearing|35-33-7-3.5. Conformity of Initial Hearing to Summons; Probable Cause

Sec. 3.5. The initial hearing of a person issued a:(1) summons; or(2) summons and promise to appear;must take place according to the terms of the summons. At such an initial hearing, a determination of probable cause is not required unless the prosecuting attorney requests on the record that the person be held in custody before his trial.As added by P.L.320-1983, SEC.9.
IN Code § 35-33-7-4 (2021)
2021 Indiana Code|Title 35. Criminal Law and Procedure|Article 33. Preliminary Proceedings|Chapter 7. Probable Cause; Initial Hearing|35-33-7-4. Arrest Under Warrant; Jurisdiction; Time of Initial Hearing

Sec. 4. A person arrested in accordance with the provisions of a warrant shall be taken promptly for an initial hearing before the court issuing the warrant or before a judicial officer having jurisdiction over the defendant. If the arrested person has been released in accordance with the provisions for release stated on the warrant, the initial hearing shall occur at any time within twenty (20) days after his arrest.As added by Acts 1981, P.L.298, SEC.2.