reglab/housing_qa huggingface dataset:
UT Code § 70A-2-722 (2021)
2021 Utah Code|Title 70A - Uniform Commercial Code|Chapter 2 - Uniform Commercial Code - Sales|Part 7 - Remedies|Section 722 - Who can sue third parties for injury to goods.

70A-2-722. Who can sue third parties for injury to goods.  Where a third party so deals with goods which have been identified to a contract for sale as to cause actionable injury to a party to that contract:  (1) a right of action against the third party is in either party to the contract for sale who has title to or a security interest or a special property or an insurable interest in the goods; and if the goods have been destroyed or converted a right of action is also in the party who either bore the risk of loss under the contract for sale or has since the injury assumed that risk as against the other;     (2) if at the time of the injury the party plaintiff did not bear the risk of loss as against the other party to the contract for sale and there is no arrangement between them for disposition of the recovery, his suit or settlement is, subject to his own interest, as a fiduciary for the other party to the contract;     (3) either party may with the consent of the other sue for the benefit of whom it may concern.    Enacted by Chapter 154, 1965 General Session
UT Code § 70A-2-723 (2021)
2021 Utah Code|Title 70A - Uniform Commercial Code|Chapter 2 - Uniform Commercial Code - Sales|Part 7 - Remedies|Section 723 - Proof of market price -- Time and place.

70A-2-723. Proof of market price -- Time and place.    (1) If an action based on anticipatory repudiation comes to trial before the time for performance with respect to some or all of the goods, any damages based on market price (Section 70A-2-708 or Section 70A-2-713) shall be determined according to the price of such goods prevailing at the time when the aggrieved party learned of the repudiation.     (2) If evidence of a price prevailing at the times or places described in this chapter is not readily available the price prevailing within any reasonable time before or after the time described or at any other place which in commercial judgment or under usage of trade would serve as a reasonable substitute for the one described may be used, making any proper allowance for the cost of transporting the goods to or from such other place.     (3) Evidence of a relevant price prevailing at a time or place other than the one described in this chapter offered by one party is not admissible unless and until he has given the other party such notice as the court finds sufficient to prevent unfair surprise.    Enacted by Chapter 154, 1965 General Session
UT Code § 70A-2-724 (2021)
2021 Utah Code|Title 70A - Uniform Commercial Code|Chapter 2 - Uniform Commercial Code - Sales|Part 7 - Remedies|Section 724 - Admissibility of market quotations.

70A-2-724. Admissibility of market quotations.  Whenever the prevailing price or value of any goods regularly bought and sold in any established commodity market is in issue, reports in official publications or trade journals or in newspapers or periodicals of general circulation published as the reports of such market shall be admissible in evidence. The circumstances of the preparation of such a report may be shown to affect its weight but not its admissibility.  Enacted by Chapter 154, 1965 General Session
UT Code § 70A-2-725 (2021)
2021 Utah Code|Title 70A - Uniform Commercial Code|Chapter 2 - Uniform Commercial Code - Sales|Part 7 - Remedies|Section 725 - Statute of limitations in contracts for sale.

70A-2-725. Statute of limitations in contracts for sale.    (1) An action for breach of any contract for sale must be commenced within four years after the cause of action has accrued. By the original agreement the parties may reduce the period of limitation to not less than one year but may not extend it.     (2) A cause of action accrues when the breach occurs, regardless of the aggrieved party's lack of knowledge of the breach. A breach of warranty occurs when tender of delivery is made, except that where a warranty explicitly extends to future performance of the goods and discovery of the breach must await the time of such performance the cause of action accrues when the breach is or should have been discovered.     (3) Where an action commenced within the time limited by Subsection (1) is so terminated as to leave available a remedy by another action for the same breach such other action may be commenced after the expiration of the time limited and within six months after the termination of the first action unless the termination resulted from voluntary discontinuance or from dismissal for failure or neglect to prosecute.     (4) This section does not alter the law on tolling of the statute of limitations nor does it apply to causes of action which have accrued before December 31, 1965.    Amended by Chapter 13, 1998 General Session
UT Code § 70A-2-801 (2021)
2021 Utah Code|Title 70A - Uniform Commercial Code|Chapter 2 - Uniform Commercial Code - Sales|Part 8 - Assistive Technology Warranty Act|Section 801 - Title.

70A-2-801. Title.  This part is known as the "Assistive Technology Warranty Act."  Enacted by Chapter 166, 1997 General Session
UT Code § 70A-2-803 (2021)
2021 Utah Code|Title 70A - Uniform Commercial Code|Chapter 2 - Uniform Commercial Code - Sales|Part 8 - Assistive Technology Warranty Act|Section 803 - Warranties.

70A-2-803. Warranties.    (1) A manufacturer who sells or leases assistive technology to a consumer in this state, either directly or through an authorized dealer or lessor, shall warrant that the assistive technology shall be free from any condition, defect, or malfunction which substantially impairs the use, value, or safety of the assistive technology for a period of one year from the date of original delivery.     (2) Nothing in this chapter shall limit the ability of the manufacturer or any dealer or lessor from providing additional warranties on assistive technology nor limit or affect any other warranties applicable to assistive technology, whether implied or expressed.    Enacted by Chapter 166, 1997 General Session
UT Code § 70A-2-804 (2021)
2021 Utah Code|Title 70A - Uniform Commercial Code|Chapter 2 - Uniform Commercial Code - Sales|Part 8 - Assistive Technology Warranty Act|Section 804 - Nonconforming assistive technology -- Remedies.

70A-2-804. Nonconforming assistive technology -- Remedies.    (1)   (a) If assistive technology does not conform to any applicable warranties, and the consumer reports the nonconformity to the manufacturer, its agent, or authorized dealer or lessor within one year from the date of original delivery to the consumer, the manufacturer, its agent, or authorized dealer or lessor shall make repairs necessary to conform the assistive technology to the warranties, whether or not the repairs are made after one year from the date of original delivery.     (b) Repairs, including parts and labor, made under warranty shall be at no charge to the consumer.       (2) After a reasonable attempt to repair the assistive technology, if the manufacturer, its agent, or authorized dealer or lessor is unable to conform the assistive technology to applicable warranties by repairing or correcting any defect, condition, or malfunction that substantially impairs the use, value, or safety of the assistive technology, the manufacturer shall, within 30 days of notice from and at the direction of the consumer:   (a)   (i) replace the assistive technology with comparable new assistive technology; and     (ii) refund any collateral costs; or       (b)   (i) accept return of the assistive technology; and     (ii) refund:   (A) the full purchase price, collateral costs, and any finance charges paid at the point of sale; minus     (B) a reasonable allowance for the use of the assistive technology.           (3)   (a) A "reasonable attempt to repair" has been made to conform assistive technology to applicable warranties if:   (i) the assistive technology has been subject to repair three or more times, for the same reason, by the manufacturer, its agent, or authorized dealer or lessor; or     (ii) the assistive technology is out of service to the consumer for an aggregate of 30 or more calendar days because of warranty nonconformities.       (b) The 30-day period described in Subsection (3)(a)(ii) shall begin on the day the consumer first makes the assistive technology available for repair to the manufacturer, its agent, or authorized dealer or lessor.      Amended by Chapter 200, 1999 General Session
UT Code § 70A-2-805 (2021)
2021 Utah Code|Title 70A - Uniform Commercial Code|Chapter 2 - Uniform Commercial Code - Sales|Part 8 - Assistive Technology Warranty Act|Section 805 - Refunds -- Computation -- Prohibition of enforcement of lease against consumer.

70A-2-805. Refunds -- Computation -- Prohibition of enforcement of lease against consumer.    (1) Refunds paid by the manufacturer shall be made to the consumer, any lessor, and any perfected lienholders as their interests may appear in order of priority.     (2) A reasonable allowance for use may not exceed the amount obtained by multiplying the full purchase price or lease price of the assistive technology by a fraction, the denominator of which is 1,825 and the numerator of which is the number of days the consumer used the assistive technology before first reporting the nonconformity to the manufacturer, its agent, or authorized dealer or lessor.     (3)   (a) For a consumer who leases assistive technology from a lessor, the manufacturer shall refund to the lessor and to any holder of a perfected security interest in the assistive technology, as the interest may appear, the current value of the written lease.     (b) The current value of the written lease equals the total amount for which that lease obligates the consumer during the period of the lease remaining after its early termination, plus the assistive technology dealer's early termination costs and the value of the assistive technology at the lease expiration date if the lease sets forth that value, less the assistive technology lessor's early termination savings.     (c) The manufacturer shall refund to the consumer the amount that the consumer paid under the lease plus any collateral costs, less a reasonable allowance for use.       (4) The lease may not be enforced against the consumer if the consumer receives a refund under this chapter.    Enacted by Chapter 166, 1997 General Session
UT Code § 70A-2-806 (2021)
2021 Utah Code|Title 70A - Uniform Commercial Code|Chapter 2 - Uniform Commercial Code - Sales|Part 8 - Assistive Technology Warranty Act|Section 806 - Resale or release of returned assistive technology -- Prohibition.

70A-2-806. Resale or release of returned assistive technology -- Prohibition.  Assistive technology which is replaced by a manufacturer under this chapter or under a similar law of another state may not be sold or leased again in this state unless full written disclosure of the reason for return is made to any prospective purchaser or lessee.  Enacted by Chapter 166, 1997 General Session
UT Code § 70A-2-807 (2021)
2021 Utah Code|Title 70A - Uniform Commercial Code|Chapter 2 - Uniform Commercial Code - Sales|Part 8 - Assistive Technology Warranty Act|Section 807 - Consumer may not waive rights under chapter -- Enforcement -- Remedies not exclusive.

70A-2-807. Consumer may not waive rights under chapter -- Enforcement -- Remedies not exclusive.    (1) Any waiver by a consumer of rights under this chapter is void.     (2)   (a) A consumer may bring an action in district court to enforce the consumer's rights under this chapter.     (b) The court shall award a consumer who prevails in an action under this chapter twice the amount of any pecuniary loss, together with costs, disbursements, reasonable attorney's fees, and any equitable relief that the court determines is appropriate.       (3) The attorney general may file an action in district court to enforce this chapter on behalf of any consumer or in its own behalf. In addition to the other remedies provided in this chapter, the attorney general is also entitled to an award for reasonable attorney's fees, court costs, and investigative expenses.     (4) This chapter shall not be construed as imposing any liability on an authorized dealer or lessor or as creating a cause of action by a consumer against a dealer or lessor, except regarding any express warranties made by the dealer or lessor apart from the manufacturer's warranties.     (5) Nothing in this chapter shall limit or impair the rights or remedies which are otherwise available to a consumer under any other provision of law.    Enacted by Chapter 166, 1997 General Session
UT Code § 70A-2a-101 (2021)
2021 Utah Code|Title 70A - Uniform Commercial Code|Chapter 2a - Uniform Commercial Code - Leases|Part 1 - Short Title, Definitions, Options|Section 101 - Short title.

70A-2a-101. Short title.  This chapter is known as the Uniform Commercial Code - Leases.  Enacted by Chapter 197, 1990 General Session
UT Code § 70A-2a-102 (2021)
2021 Utah Code|Title 70A - Uniform Commercial Code|Chapter 2a - Uniform Commercial Code - Leases|Part 1 - Short Title, Definitions, Options|Section 102 - Scope.

70A-2a-102. Scope.  This chapter applies to any transaction, regardless of form, that creates a lease.  Enacted by Chapter 197, 1990 General Session
UT Code § 70A-2a-104 (2021)
2021 Utah Code|Title 70A - Uniform Commercial Code|Chapter 2a - Uniform Commercial Code - Leases|Part 1 - Short Title, Definitions, Options|Section 104 - Leases subject to other law.

70A-2a-104. Leases subject to other law.    (1) A lease, although subject to this chapter, is also subject to any applicable:   (a) certificate of title statute of this state;     (b) certificate of title statute of another jurisdiction as provided in Section 70A-2a-105;     (c) consumer protection statute of this state; or     (d) final consumer protection decision of a court of this state as of July 1, 1993.       (2) In case of conflict between this chapter (other than Section 70A-2a-105 and Subsections 70A-2a-304(3) and 70A-2a-305(3)) and a statute or decision referred to in Subsection (1), the statute or decision controls.     (3) Failure to comply with any applicable law has only the effect specified in that law.    Amended by Chapter 237, 1993 General Session
UT Code § 70A-2a-105 (2021)
2021 Utah Code|Title 70A - Uniform Commercial Code|Chapter 2a - Uniform Commercial Code - Leases|Part 1 - Short Title, Definitions, Options|Section 105 - Territorial application to goods covered by certificate of title.

70A-2a-105. Territorial application to goods covered by certificate of title.  Subject to the provisions of Subsections 70A-2a-304(3) and 70A-2a-305(3), with respect to goods covered by a certificate of title issued under a statute of this state or of another jurisdiction, compliance and the effect of compliance or noncompliance with a certificate of title statute are governed by the law, including the conflict of laws rules, of the jurisdiction issuing the certificate until the earlier of surrender of the certificate or four months after the goods are removed from that jurisdiction, and thereafter until a new certificate of title is issued by another jurisdiction.  Enacted by Chapter 197, 1990 General Session
UT Code § 70A-2a-106 (2021)
2021 Utah Code|Title 70A - Uniform Commercial Code|Chapter 2a - Uniform Commercial Code - Leases|Part 1 - Short Title, Definitions, Options|Section 106 - Limitation on power of parties to consumer lease to choose applicable law and judicial forum.

70A-2a-106. Limitation on power of parties to consumer lease to choose applicable law and judicial forum.    (1) If the law chosen by the parties to a consumer lease is that of a jurisdiction other than a jurisdiction in which the lessee resides at the time the lease agreement becomes enforceable or within 30 days thereafter or in which the goods are to be used or if the goods are to be used in more than one jurisdiction none of which is the residence of the lessee in which the lease is executed by the lessee, the choice is not enforceable.     (2) If the judicial forum chosen by the parties to a consumer lease is a forum that would not otherwise have jurisdiction over the lessee, the choice is not enforceable.    Enacted by Chapter 197, 1990 General Session
UT Code § 70A-2a-107 (2021)
2021 Utah Code|Title 70A - Uniform Commercial Code|Chapter 2a - Uniform Commercial Code - Leases|Part 1 - Short Title, Definitions, Options|Section 107 - Waiver or renunciation of claim or right after default.

70A-2a-107. Waiver or renunciation of claim or right after default.  Any claim or right arising out of an alleged default or breach of warranty may be discharged in whole or in part without consideration by a written waiver or renunciation signed and delivered by the aggrieved party.  Enacted by Chapter 197, 1990 General Session
UT Code § 70A-2a-108 (2021)
2021 Utah Code|Title 70A - Uniform Commercial Code|Chapter 2a - Uniform Commercial Code - Leases|Part 1 - Short Title, Definitions, Options|Section 108 - Unconscionability.

70A-2a-108. Unconscionability.    (1) If the court as a matter of law finds a lease contract or any clause of a lease contract to have been unconscionable at the time it was made, the court may refuse to enforce the lease contract, or it may enforce the remainder of the lease contract without the unconscionable clause, or it may limit the application of an unconscionable clause to avoid any unconscionable result.     (2) With respect to a consumer lease, if the court as a matter of law finds that a lease contract or any clause of a lease contract has been induced by unconscionable conduct, or that unconscionable conduct has occurred in the collection of a claim arising from a lease contract, the court may grant appropriate relief.     (3) Before making a finding of unconscionability under Subsection (1) or (2), the court, on its own motion or that of a party, shall afford the parties a reasonable opportunity to present evidence as to the setting, purpose, and effect of the lease contract or clause thereof, or of the conduct.     (4) In an action in which the lessee claims unconscionability with respect to a consumer lease:   (a) If the court finds unconscionability under Subsection (1) or (2), the court shall award reasonable attorney's fees to the lessee.     (b) If the court does not find unconscionability and the lessee claiming unconscionability has brought or maintained an action he knew to be groundless, the court shall award reasonable attorney's fees to the party against whom the claim is made.     (c) In determining attorney's fees, the amount of the recovery on behalf of the claimant under Subsections (1) and (2) is not controlling.      Enacted by Chapter 197, 1990 General Session
UT Code § 70A-2a-109 (2021)
2021 Utah Code|Title 70A - Uniform Commercial Code|Chapter 2a - Uniform Commercial Code - Leases|Part 1 - Short Title, Definitions, Options|Section 109 - Option to accelerate at will.

70A-2a-109. Option to accelerate at will.    (1) A term providing that one party or his successor in interest may accelerate payment or performance or require collateral or additional collateral "at will" or "when he deems himself insecure" or in words of similar import must be construed to mean that he has power to do so only if he in good faith believes that the prospect of payment or performance is impaired.     (2) With respect to a consumer lease, the burden of establishing good faith under Subsection (1) is on the party who exercised the power; otherwise the burden of establishing lack of good faith is on the party against whom the power has been exercised.    Enacted by Chapter 197, 1990 General Session
UT Code § 70A-2a-201 (2021)
2021 Utah Code|Title 70A - Uniform Commercial Code|Chapter 2a - Uniform Commercial Code - Leases|Part 2 - Statute of Frauds, Seal, Offers, Warranties, Insurance|Section 201 - Statute of frauds.

70A-2a-201. Statute of frauds.    (1) A lease contract is not enforceable by way of action or defense unless:   (a) in a lease contract that is not a consumer lease, the total payments to be made under the lease contract, excluding payments for options to renew or buy, are less than $1,000; or     (b) there is a writing, signed by the party against whom enforcement is sought or by that party's authorized agent, sufficient to indicate that a lease contract has been made between the parties and to describe the goods leased and the lease term.       (2) Any description of leased goods or of the lease term is sufficient and satisfies Subsection (1)(b), whether or not it is specific, if it reasonably identifies what is described.     (3) A writing is not insufficient because it omits or incorrectly states a term agreed upon, but the lease contract is not enforceable under Subsection (1)(b) beyond the lease term and the quantity of goods shown in the writing.     (4) A lease contract that does not satisfy the requirements of Subsection (1), but which is valid in other respects, is enforceable:   (a) if the goods are to be specially manufactured or obtained for the lessee and are not suitable for lease or sale to others in the ordinary course of the lessor's business, and the lessor, before notice of repudiation is received and under circumstances that reasonably indicate that the goods are for the lessee, has made either a substantial beginning of their manufacture or commitments for their procurement;     (b) if the party against whom enforcement is sought admits in that party's pleading, testimony, or otherwise in court that a lease contract was made, but the lease contract is not enforceable under this provision beyond the quantity of goods admitted; or     (c) with respect to goods that have been received and accepted by the lessee.       (5) The lease term under a lease contract referred to in Subsection (4) is enforceable:   (a) if there is a writing signed by the party against whom enforcement is sought or by that party's authorized agent specifying the lease term, the term so specified;     (b) if the party against whom enforcement is sought admits in that party's pleading, testimony, or otherwise in court a lease term, the term so admitted; or     (c) if there is a reasonable lease term.      Enacted by Chapter 197, 1990 General Session
UT Code § 70A-2a-202 (2021)
2021 Utah Code|Title 70A - Uniform Commercial Code|Chapter 2a - Uniform Commercial Code - Leases|Part 2 - Statute of Frauds, Seal, Offers, Warranties, Insurance|Section 202 - Final written expression -- Parol or extrinsic evidence.

70A-2a-202. Final written expression -- Parol or extrinsic evidence.  Terms with respect to which the confirmatory memoranda of the parties agree or which are otherwise set forth in a writing intended by the parties as a final expression of their agreement with respect to such terms as are included therein may not be contradicted by evidence of any prior agreement or of a contemporaneous oral agreement, but may be explained or supplemented:  (1) by course of dealing or usage of trade or by course of performance; and     (2) by evidence of consistent additional terms unless the court finds the writing to have been intended also as a complete and exclusive statement of the terms of the agreement.    Enacted by Chapter 197, 1990 General Session
UT Code § 70A-2a-203 (2021)
2021 Utah Code|Title 70A - Uniform Commercial Code|Chapter 2a - Uniform Commercial Code - Leases|Part 2 - Statute of Frauds, Seal, Offers, Warranties, Insurance|Section 203 - Seals inoperative.

70A-2a-203. Seals inoperative.  The affixing of a seal to a writing evidencing a lease contract or an offer to enter into a lease contract does not render the writing a sealed instrument and the law with respect to sealed instruments does not apply to the lease contract or offer.  Enacted by Chapter 197, 1990 General Session