CO Code § 10-3-107 (2021)
2021 Colorado Code|Title 10 - Insurance|Article 3 - Regulation of Insurance Companies|Part 1 - General|§ 10-3-107. Appointment of Registered Agent - Commissioner Agent for Service of Process

  Except pursuant to the provisions of article 5 of this title, no foreign insurance company, directly or indirectly, shall issue policies, take risks, or transact business in this state until it has first appointed, in writing, the commissioner to be the true and lawful attorney of such company in and for this state, upon whom all lawful process in any action or proceeding against the company may be served with the same effect as if the company existed in this state. Such power of attorney shall stipulate and agree, upon the part of the company, that any lawful process against the company that is served on said attorney, or in the commissioner's absence any employee in charge of the commissioner's office, shall be of the same legal force and validity as if served on the company and that the authority shall continue in force so long as any liability remains outstanding against the company in this state. A certificate of such appointment, duly certified and authenticated, shall be filed in the office of the commissioner, and copies certified by the commissioner shall be deemed sufficient evidence, and service upon such attorney shall be deemed sufficient service upon the principal. The certificate of appointment may be filed in an electronic format. (1.5)   The provisions of subsection (1) of this section shall not apply to any insurance company maintaining a home office or a regional home office in this state.    Each insurance company maintaining a home office or regional home office in this state shall file with the commissioner the name of a person designated to receive service of process. The commissioner shall maintain a list of persons so designated and shall make information from such list available to any person upon request. Each company must report any change in the name of the person designated to receive service of process to the commissioner within ten days after making such change. The information required to be filed with the commissioner pursuant to this subsection (1.5) may be filed in an electronic format.       Whenever lawful process against any insurance company is served upon the commissioner, three copies shall be furnished, and he shall forthwith forward a copy of the process served on him by certified mail, postpaid, to the secretary of the company or, in case of companies of foreign countries, to the resident manager in this country, and he shall also forward a copy thereof to the general agent of said company in this state.      History. Source: L. 13: P. 339, § 22. C.L. § 2492. CSA: C. 87, § 20. L. 49: P. 473, § 19. CRS 53: § 72-1-33. C.R.S. 1963: § 72-1-33. L. 73: P. 847, § 1. L. 86: (2) amended, p. 554, § 2, effective July 1. L. 89: (2) amended, p. 436, § 4, effective July 1. L. 91: (2) amended, p. 1228, § 2, effective June 5; (1.5) added, p. 1243, § 4, effective July 1. L. 2004: (1) and (1.5)(b) amended, p. 1059, § 4, effective July 1. History. Source: L. 13: P. 339, § 22. C.L. § 2492. CSA: C. 87, § 20. L. 49: P. 473, § 19. CRS 53: § 72-1-33. C.R.S. 1963: § 72-1-33. L. 73: P. 847, § 1. L. 86: (2) amended, p. 554, § 2, effective July 1. L. 89: (2) amended, p. 436, § 4, effective July 1. L. 91: (2) amended, p. 1228, § 2, effective June 5; (1.5) added, p. 1243, § 4, effective July 1. L. 2004: (1) and (1.5)(b) amended, p. 1059, § 4, effective July 1.    ANNOTATION   Law reviews. For article, “Colorado's Short-Arm Jurisdiction”, see 37 U. Colo. L. Rev. 309 (1965).   Service on commissioner authorized in suit on bond on Colorado contract. The execution and delivery of a bond in Colorado to secure performance of a contract to be performed in Colorado authorizes the service of process, in a suit on the bond, on the commissioner. Bankers' Sur. Co. v. Town of Holly, 219 F. 96 (8th Cir. 1915).   Where summons was served on the deputy commissioner rather than commissioner of insurance, then, where the surety company received the summons and complaint, an objection to such service is very technical and does not appeal favorably to a court of justice. Bankers' Sur. Co. v. Town of Holly, 219 F. 96 (8th Cir. 1915).