reglab/housing_qa huggingface dataset:
GA Code § 13-4-61 (2021)
2021 Georgia Code|Title 13 - Contracts|Chapter 4 - Modification, Extinguishment, and Renewal|Article 4 - Rescission|§ 13-4-61. Rights of Vendor as to Reclamation of Goods Where Contract Rescinded for Fraud

 Except as otherwise provided in Title 11, the "Uniform Commercial Code," where a contract of sale is rescinded for fraud, the rights of the vendor reclaiming the goods are superior to those of one who has acquired the goods or a lien thereon in consideration of an antecedent debt.   (Civil Code 1895, § 3713; Civil Code 1910, § 4307; Code 1933, § 20-908.)   Cross references.   - Provisions of Uniform Commercial Code relating to sales, § 11-2-101 et seq.   JUDICIAL DECISIONS    Defrauded vendor of land had rights superior to vendee's grantee taking as security for preexisting debt. Mize v. Bank of Whigham, 138 Ga. 499, 75 S.E. 629 (1912).   Vendor's right under O.C.G.A.    § 13-4-61 superior to mortgagee's under mortgage to secure antecedent debt. - Right of seller to rescind sale for fraud is superior to right of mortgagee whose mortgage was taken to secure antecedent debt. Harris v. Evans, 134 Ga. 161, 67 S.E. 880 (1910).   On facts, seller's right of reclamation superior to those of buyer's trustee in bankruptcy.   - When seller was induced to sell goods shortly before buyer's bankruptcy, at time when buyer was insolvent, and when buyer did not intend to pay, and concealed the buyer's insolvency by affirmative misrepresentations, giving the seller the right to rescind, the seller could reclaim goods as against buyer's trustee. In re Spinks Drug Co., 298 F. 307 (N.D. Ga. 1924).    Cited in Sutton v. Ford, 144 Ga. 587, 87 S.E. 799, 1918D L.R.A. 561, 1918A Ann. Cas. 106 (1916); Singletary v. GMAC, 73 F.2d 453 (5th Cir. 1934); Puckett v. Reese, 203 Ga. 716, 48 S.E.2d 297 (1948).   RESEARCH REFERENCES   Am. Jur. 2d.   - 77 Am. Jur. 2d, Vendor and Purchaser, §§ 349, 463, 502.   C.J.S.   - 92 C.J.S., Vendor and Purchaser, § 440 et seq.   ALR.    - Validity and effect of stipulation to the effect that vendee or purchaser does not rely upon representations of vendor or seller, or the latter's agent, 10 A.L.R. 1472.    Recovery in action of deceit for fraudulently inducing contract of expense of other litigation incident to contract, 41 A.L.R. 1156.    Dealings between seller and buyer after latter's knowledge of former's fraud as waiver of claim for damages on account of fraud, 106 A.L.R. 172.    Assignability of right to rescind or of right to return of money or other property as incident of rescission, 110 A.L.R. 849; 162 A.L.R. 743.    Compensation as alternative relief upon denial of rescission to purchaser of land, 175 A.L.R. 686.   Rescission of corporate stock sale or transaction as authorizing court to award recovery of requisite number of shares to party entitled to relief, 14 A.L.R.2d 855.   What constitutes abandonment of land contract by vendee, 68 A.L.R.2d 581.
GA Code § 13-4-82 (2021)
2021 Georgia Code|Title 13 - Contracts|Chapter 4 - Modification, Extinguishment, and Renewal|Article 5 - Release|§ 13-4-82. Intermarriage of Parties

 Intermarriage of the parties generally releases a debt created prior to marriage. However, intermarriage of the parties shall not release a debt arising from an antenuptial agreement, as such term is defined in Code Section 19-3-60.   (Orig. Code 1863, § 2804; Code 1868, § 2812; Code 1873, § 2863; Code 1882, § 2863; Civil Code 1895, § 3716; Civil Code 1910, § 4310; Code 1933, § 20-911; Ga. L. 2018, p. 155, § 2-1/HB 190.)    The 2018 amendment,  effective July 1, 2018, in the second sentence, substituted "parties shall" for "parties does" in the middle and substituted "agreement, as such term is defined in Code Section 19-3-60" for "contract" at the end.   Cross references.   - Antenuptial agreements generally, § 19-3-62 et seq.   JUDICIAL DECISIONS    Subsequent marriage of plaintiff to defendant extinguishes right to sue for breach of promise because it is a personal right. Harris v. Tisom, 63 Ga. 629, 36 Am. R. 126 (1879).
GA Code § 13-4-100 (2021)
2021 Georgia Code|Title 13 - Contracts|Chapter 4 - Modification, Extinguishment, and Renewal|Article 6 - Accord and Satisfaction|§ 13-4-100. Effect of Executory Accord

 An accord may not amount to an extinguishment of the original debt but may extend only to suspend the execution or collection thereof for a limited time; in the meantime, an action on the original debt cannot be sustained.   (Orig. Code 1863, § 2820; Code 1868, § 2828; Code 1873, § 2879; Code 1882, § 2879; Civil Code 1895, § 3733; Civil Code 1910, § 4327; Code 1933, § 20-1202.)   RESEARCH REFERENCES   Am. Jur. 2d.   - 1 Am. Jur. 2d, Accord and Satisfaction, §§ 48, 49.   ALR.    - Failure to perform act required by new agreement as affecting character thereof as accord and satisfaction, 10 A.L.R. 222; 14 A.L.R. 230.    Part payment of liquidated indebtedness by, or with aid of, third person as consideration for its acceptance in discharge of entire debt, 41 A.L.R. 1490.    Trade acceptance or unsecured note or bill of debtor as accord and satisfaction, 62 A.L.R. 751.    Acceptance of amount appropriated on account of claim against state or other public body as bar to balance of claim, 70 A.L.R. 1208.    Income tax in respect of amount collected on a debt which had been deducted as a bad debt in the return for a previous year, 143 A.L.R. 338.    Validity and effect of agreement to pay original creditor part of debt refinanced under Federal Farm Loan Act, 147 A.L.R. 743.   Interest of spouse in estate by entireties as subject to satisfaction of his or her individual debt, 75 A.L.R.2d 1172.   Conveyance or surrender of property as an accord and satisfaction of contract obligation, 59 A.L.R.5th 665.
GA Code § 13-4-101 (2021)
2021 Georgia Code|Title 13 - Contracts|Chapter 4 - Modification, Extinguishment, and Renewal|Article 6 - Accord and Satisfaction|§ 13-4-101. Elements and Requirements of Accord and Satisfaction Generally

 Accord and satisfaction occurs where the parties to an agreement, by a subsequent agreement, have satisfied the former agreement, and the latter agreement has been executed. The execution of a new agreement may itself amount to a satisfaction of the former agreement, where it is so expressly agreed by the parties; and, without such agreement, if the new promise is founded on a new consideration, the taking of it is a satisfaction of the former agreement.   (Orig. Code 1863, § 2819; Code 1868, § 2827; Code 1873, § 2878; Code 1882, § 2878; Civil Code 1895, § 3732; Civil Code 1910, § 4326; Code 1933, § 20-1201.)   Law reviews.   - For comment on Chocran v. Bell, 102 Ga. App. 617, 117 S.E.2d 645 (1960), see 24 Ga. B.J. 422 (1962).   JUDICIAL DECISIONS   ANALYSIS    General Consideration   Subject Matter of Accord and Satisfaction   Agreement   Execution   Application    RESEARCH REFERENCES   Am. Jur. 2d.   - 1 Am. Jur. 2d, Accord and Satisfaction, § 1, 2. 60 Am. Jur. 2d, Payment, § 2. 66 Am. Jur. 2d, Release, § 1.   C.J.S.   - 1 C.J.S., Accord and Satisfaction, § 1. 17A C.J.S., Contracts, §§ 549, 578.   ALR.    - Failure to perform act required by new agreement as affecting character thereof as accord and satisfaction, 10 A.L.R. 222; 14 A.L.R. 230.    Trade acceptance or unsecured note or bill of debtor as accord and satisfaction, 62 A.L.R. 751.    Principal's acceptance of remittance from agent as an accord and satisfaction, 80 A.L.R. 1056.    Accepted offer to give or take less than full amount of liquidated claim as a novation or an accord executory, 96 A.L.R. 1133.    Payment of undisputed amount or liability as consideration for discharge of disputed amount or liability, 112 A.L.R. 1219.    Return or tender of consideration for release or compromise as condition of action for rescission or cancellation, action upon original claim, or action for damages sustained by the fraud inducing the release or compromise, 134 A.L.R. 6.    Validity and effect of agreement to pay original creditor part of debt refinanced under Federal Farm Loan Act, 147 A.L.R. 743.   Interest of spouse in estate by entireties as subject to satisfaction of his or her individual debt, 75 A.L.R.2d 1172.   Modern status of rule that acceptance of check purporting to be final settlement of disputed amount constitutes accord and satisfaction, 42 A.L.R.4th 12.   Creditor's certification of check purporting to be final settlement of disputed amount as constituting accord and satisfaction, 42 A.L.R.4th 95.   Creditor's retention without negotiation of check purporting to be final settlement of disputed amount as constituting accord and satisfaction, 42 A.L.R.4th 117.
GA Code § 13-4-102 (2021)
2021 Georgia Code|Title 13 - Contracts|Chapter 4 - Modification, Extinguishment, and Renewal|Article 6 - Accord and Satisfaction|§ 13-4-102. Benefit to Creditor

 An accord and satisfaction must be of some advantage, legal or equitable, to the creditor or it shall not have the effect of barring him from his legal rights under the original agreement.   (Orig. Code 1863, § 2821; Code 1868, § 2829; Code 1873, § 2880; Code 1882, § 2880; Civil Code 1895, § 3734; Civil Code 1910, § 4328; Code 1933, § 20-1203.)   RESEARCH REFERENCES   ALR.    - Debtor's waiver of, or refraining from exercising, right to resort to bankruptcy, or his insolvency, as consideration for release of all or part of liability, 108 A.L.R. 656.    Payment of undisputed amount or liability as consideration for discharge of disputed amount or liability, 112 A.L.R. 1219.
GA Code § 13-4-103 (2021)
2021 Georgia Code|Title 13 - Contracts|Chapter 4 - Modification, Extinguishment, and Renewal|Article 6 - Accord and Satisfaction|§ 13-4-103. Acceptance of Less Than Amount of Debt

  Except as otherwise provided in this Code section, an agreement by a creditor to receive less than the amount of his debt cannot be pleaded as an accord and satisfaction unless it is actually executed by the payment of the money, the giving of additional security, the substitution of another debtor, or some other new consideration.   Acceptance by a creditor of a check, draft, or money order marked "payment in full" or with language of equivalent condition, in an amount less than the total indebtedness, shall not constitute an accord and satisfaction unless:   A bona fide dispute or controversy exists as to the amount due; or   Such payment is made pursuant to an independent agreement between the creditor and debtor that such payment shall satisfy the debt.      (Orig. Code 1863, § 2822; Code 1868, § 2830; Code 1873, § 2881; Code 1882, § 2881; Civil Code 1895, § 3735; Civil Code 1910, § 4329; Code 1933, § 20-1204; Ga. L. 1979, p. 1051, § 1.)   Law reviews.   - For article discussing the anachronistic nature of the Georgia Contracts Code as dramatized by comparing the doctrine of consideration as it is formulated in the Restatements of Contracts and in Code 1933, Title 20 (now this title), and the interpretative approach Georgia courts have taken in dealing with such Code, see 13 Ga. L. Rev. 499 (1979). For article surveying recent legislative and judicial developments in Georgia's real property laws, see 31 Mercer L. Rev. 187 (1979). (But see amendments by Ga. L. 1981, p. 876.) For article, "Construction Law," see 53 Mercer L. Rev. 173 (2001). For comment on Doniger and Co. v. Briggs, 61 Ga. App. 699, 7 S.E.2d 321 (1940), see 4 Ga. B.J. 50 (1942). For comment on Rivers v. Cole Corp., 209 Ga. 406, 73 S.E.2d 573 (1952), see 15 Ga. B.J. 339 (1953).   JUDICIAL DECISIONS   ANALYSIS    General Consideration   Agreements to Accept Less   Consideration for Accord and Satisfaction   Effect of Retention of Payment    RESEARCH REFERENCES   Am. Jur. 2d.   - 1 Am. Jur. 2d, Accord and Satisfaction, §§ 19, 20, 22, 24, 31, 35, 36, 37, 46, 53.   C.J.S.   - 1 C.J.S., Accord and Satisfaction, §§ 33, 36.   ALR.    - Payment before maturity of part of a liquidated and undisputed indebtedness as a consideration for its acceptance in satisfaction of the entire debt, 24 A.L.R. 1474.    Acceptance of amount appropriated on account of claim against state or other public body as bar to balance of claim, 70 A.L.R. 1208.    Payment of undisputed amount or liability as consideration for discharge of disputed amount or liability, 112 A.L.R. 1219.    Validity and effect of agreement to pay original creditor part of debt refinanced under Federal Farm Loan Act, 147 A.L.R. 743.   Interest of spouse in estate by entireties as subject to satisfaction of his or her individual debt, 75 A.L.R.2d 1172.   Necessity and nature of consideration supporting landlord's reduction of rent, 30 A.L.R.3d 1259.
GA Code § 13-4-104 (2021)
2021 Georgia Code|Title 13 - Contracts|Chapter 4 - Modification, Extinguishment, and Renewal|Article 6 - Accord and Satisfaction|§ 13-4-104. Parties Bound by Accord and Satisfaction

 An accord and satisfaction is binding upon both parties.   (Orig. Code 1863, § 2823; Code 1868, § 2831; Code 1873, § 2882; Code 1882, § 2882; Civil Code 1895, § 3736; Civil Code 1910, § 4330; Code 1933, § 20-1205.)   Law reviews.   - For comment on Chocran v. Bell, 102 Ga. App. 617, 117 S.E.2d 645 (1960), see 24 Ga. B.J. 422 (1962).   JUDICIAL DECISIONS   ANALYSIS    General Consideration   Compromise of Doubtful Claim    RESEARCH REFERENCES   Am. Jur. 2d.   - 15A Am. Jur. 2d, Compromise and Settlement, §§ 18, 37, 38.   C.J.S.   - 17 C.J.S., Contracts, §§ 104, 118, 119, 208. 17A C.J.S., Contracts, §§ 231, 232, 411.   ALR.    - Failure to perform act required by new agreement as affecting character thereof as accord and satisfaction, 10 A.L.R. 222; 14 A.L.R. 230.    Surrender of, or forbearance to prosecute, a claim for damages for personal injuries or death as a consideration, 57 A.L.R. 279.    Agreement with one tortfeasor that any judgment that may be recovered will not be enforced against him, as affecting liability of cotortfeasor, 160 A.L.R. 870.   Admissibility of evidence of unperformed compromise agreement, 26 A.L.R.2d 858.   Family settlement of testator's estate, 29 A.L.R.3d 8.   Contempt for violation of compromise and settlement the terms of which were approved by court not incorporated in court order, decree, or judgment, 84 A.L.R.3d 1047.
GA Code § 13-5-1 (2021)
2021 Georgia Code|Title 13 - Contracts|Chapter 5 - Defenses|Article 1 - General Provisions|§ 13-5-1. Pleading of Facts Indicating Contract Not Obligatory Generally

 Any fact going to show that a contract was not obligatory, though executed, may be pleaded as a defense.   (Orig. Code 1863, § 2797; Code 1868, § 2805; Code 1873, § 2856; Code 1882, § 2856; Civil Code 1895, § 3706; Civil Code 1910, § 4300; Code 1933, § 20-901.)   RESEARCH REFERENCES   C.J.S.   - 17 C.J.S., Contracts, § 17.   ALR.    - Failure to procure occupational or business license or permit as affecting validity or enforceability of contract, 30 A.L.R. 834; 42 A.L.R. 1226; 118 A.L.R. 646.    Validity and enforceability of contract, the making or performance of which involves breach of a contract made by one of the parties with a third person, or impairs his ability to perform such contract, 83 A.L.R. 32.    Estoppel of grantee or mortgagee as to amount of prior mortgage recited, 141 A.L.R. 1184.   Insurer's statements as to amount of dividends, accumulations, surplus, or the like as binding on insurer or merely illustrative, 17 A.L.R.3d 777.
GA Code § 13-5-2 (2021)
2021 Georgia Code|Title 13 - Contracts|Chapter 5 - Defenses|Article 1 - General Provisions|§ 13-5-2. Incapacity Generally

 A person may plead his own incapacity to contract.   (Orig. Code 1863, § 2698; Code 1868, § 2694; Code 1873, § 2736; Code 1882, § 2736; Civil Code 1895, § 3653; Civil Code 1910, § 4238; Code 1933, § 20-208.)   RESEARCH REFERENCES   Am. Jur. 2d.   - 41 Am. Jur. 2d, Incompetent Persons, §§ 28, 68, 95, 99, 127.   C.J.S.   - 17A C.J.S., Contracts, § 674 et seq. 44 C.J.S., Insane Persons, § 148.
GA Code § 13-5-10 (2021)
2021 Georgia Code|Title 13 - Contracts|Chapter 5 - Defenses|Article 1 - General Provisions|§ 13-5-10. Failure to Perform Dependent Covenant

 Where covenants are dependent, the failure of performance by the opposing party may be a good defense.   (Orig. Code 1863, § 2799; Code 1868, § 2807; Code 1873, § 2858; Code 1882, § 2858; Civil Code 1895, § 3709; Civil Code 1910, § 4303; Code 1933, § 20-904.)   RESEARCH REFERENCES   Am. Jur. 2d.   - 17 Am. Jur. 2d, Contracts, §§ 322, 355, 358, 362.   C.J.S.   - 17A C.J.S., Contracts, §§ 320 et seq., 344, 390, 425, 452.   ALR.    - Performance by vendor of covenant to make improvement as condition of his right to foreclose or forfeit contract, 128 A.L.R. 656.   Right to exercise option to renew or extend lease as affected by tenant's breach of other covenants or conditions, 23 A.L.R.4th 908.
GA Code § 13-5-11 (2021)
2021 Georgia Code|Title 13 - Contracts|Chapter 5 - Defenses|Article 1 - General Provisions|§ 13-5-11. Part Performance

 In a severable contract or one admitting of apportionment, a part performance may be a defense pro tanto.   (Orig. Code 1863, § 2813; Code 1868, § 2821; Code 1873, § 2872; Code 1882, § 2872; Civil Code 1895, § 3726; Civil Code 1910, § 4320; Code 1933, § 20-1103.)   RESEARCH REFERENCES   Am. Jur. 2d.   - 17 Am. Jur. 2d, Contracts, § 399.   C.J.S.   - 17A C.J.S., Contracts, § 520.   ALR.    - Doctrine of part performance as applied to contract embracing more than one subject matter, 38 A.L.R. 693.    Acceptance of principal sum as affecting right to interest, 100 A.L.R. 96.    May part performance or part payment which will take oral contract out of statute of frauds be predicated upon giving up present position, employment, business or profession, or opportunities in that field, 125 A.L.R. 399.   Liabilities or risks of loss arising out of contract for repairs or additions to, or installations in, existing building which, without fault of either party, is destroyed pending performance, 28 A.L.R.3d 788.   Limitation to quantum meruit recovery, where attorney employed under contingent fee contract is discharged without cause, 92 A.L.R.3d 690.   Limitation to quantum meruit recovery where attorney employed under contingent fee contract is discharged without cause, 56 A.L.R.5th 1.
GA Code § 13-8-2.1 (2021)
2021 Georgia Code|Title 13 - Contracts|Chapter 8 - Illegal and Void Contracts Generally|Article 1 - General Provisions|§ 13-8-2.1. Contracts in Partial Restraint of Trade

 Repealed by Ga. L. 2011, p. 399, § 3/HB 30, effective May 11, 2011.   Editor's notes.   - This Code section was based on Code 1981, § 13-8-2.1, enacted by Ga. L. 1990, p. 1676, § 2; Ga. L. 1991, p. 94, § 13; Ga. L. 2009, p. 231, § 2/HB 173.   Ga. L. 2011, p. 399, § 1, not codified by the General Assembly, provides: "During the 2009 legislative session the General Assembly enacted HB 173 (Act No. 64, Ga. L. 2009, p. 231), which was a bill that dealt with the issue of restrictive covenants in contracts and which was contingently effective on the passage of a constitutional amendment. During the 2010 legislative session the General Assembly enacted HR 178 (Ga. L. 2010, p. 1260), the constitutional amendment necessary for the statutory language of HB 173 (Act No. 64, Ga. L. 2009, p. 231), and the voters ratified the constitutional amendment on November 2, 2010. It has been suggested by certain parties that because of the effective date provisions of HB 173 (Act No. 64, Ga. L. 2009, p. 231), there may be some question about the validity of that legislation. It is the intention of this Act to remove any such uncertainty by substantially reenacting the substantive provisions of HB 173 (Act No. 64, Ga. L. 2009, p. 231), but the enactment of this Act should not be taken as evidence of a legislative determination that HB 173 (Act No. 64, Ga. L. 2009, p. 231) was in fact invalid."   Ga. L. 2011, p. 399, § 5, not codified by the General Assembly, provides, in part, that the repeal of this Code section shall apply to contracts entered into on and after May 11, 2011, and shall not apply in actions determining the enforceability of restrictive covenants entered into before May 11, 2011.
GA Code § 13-8-4 (2021)
2021 Georgia Code|Title 13 - Contracts|Chapter 8 - Illegal and Void Contracts Generally|Article 1 - General Provisions|§ 13-8-4. Liability of Stakeholder of Money Risked on Wager

 A stakeholder of money risked on a wager shall be obligated to repay the money to the party depositing it, upon demand, before it is actually paid to the winner; but if he pays the money to the winner bona fide, and without notice of the depositor's intention to retract, he shall not be liable for such payment.   (Orig. Code 1863, § 2809; Code 1868, § 2817; Code 1873, § 2868; Code 1882, § 2868; Civil Code 1895, § 3721; Civil Code 1910, § 4315; Code 1933, § 20-1005.)   RESEARCH REFERENCES   C.J.S.   - 70 C.J.S., Payment, § 157.   ALR.    - Who is nonprofessional or casual gambler within statute relating to recovery of gambling losses which in terms or by construction distinguishes between professional and nonprofessional or casual gamblers, 141 A.L.R. 941.
GA Code § 13-8-11 (2021)
2021 Georgia Code|Title 13 - Contracts|Chapter 8 - Illegal and Void Contracts Generally|Article 2 - Regulation of Agricultural Equipment Manufacturers, Distributors, and Dealers|§ 13-8-11. Legislative Findings

 The General Assembly finds that the distribution of equipment primarily designed for or used in agriculture in the State of Georgia vitally affects the general economy of the state and the public interest and public welfare and, in the exercise of its police power, it is necessary to regulate equipment primarily designed for or used in agriculture and related equipment manufacturers, distributors, dealers, and their representatives doing business in Georgia in order to prevent frauds, unfair business practices, unfair methods of competition, impositions, and other abuses upon its citizens.    (Code 1981, §13-8-11, enacted by Ga. L. 1993, p. 1585, § 4; Ga. L. 2002, p. 1101, § 1.)
GA Code § 13-8-13 (2021)
2021 Georgia Code|Title 13 - Contracts|Chapter 8 - Illegal and Void Contracts Generally|Article 2 - Regulation of Agricultural Equipment Manufacturers, Distributors, and Dealers|§ 13-8-13. Persons Subject to Provisions of Article

 Any person who engages directly or indirectly in purposeful contacts within this state in connection with the offering or advertising for sale of new equipment and parts shall be subject to the provisions of this article and shall be subject to the jurisdiction of the courts of this state upon service of process in accordance with the provisions of the laws of the State of Georgia.    (Code 1981, §13-8-13, enacted by Ga. L. 1993, p. 1585, § 4; Ga. L. 2002, p. 1101, § 1.)
GA Code § 13-8-14 (2021)
2021 Georgia Code|Title 13 - Contracts|Chapter 8 - Illegal and Void Contracts Generally|Article 2 - Regulation of Agricultural Equipment Manufacturers, Distributors, and Dealers|§ 13-8-14. Unfair Competition; Unfair or Deceptive Acts

 Unfair methods of competition and unfair or deceptive acts or practices as defined in Code Section 13-8-15 are declared to be unlawful.    (Code 1981, §13-8-14, enacted by Ga. L. 1993, p. 1585, § 4; Ga. L. 2002, p. 1101, § 1.)
GA Code § 13-8-15.1 (2021)
2021 Georgia Code|Title 13 - Contracts|Chapter 8 - Illegal and Void Contracts Generally|Article 2 - Regulation of Agricultural Equipment Manufacturers, Distributors, and Dealers|§ 13-8-15.1. Notice to Competitors Within Market Area

 Any manufacturer, distributor, or wholesaler which intends to establish a new dealership or to relocate a current dealership for a particular product line or make of equipment within the relevant market area of an existing dealership of the same product line or make of equipment shall give written 90 day notice of such intent by certified mail or statutory overnight delivery, return receipt requested, to such existing dealership. The notice shall include:    The specific location of the additional or relocated dealership;   The date on or after which the additional or relocated dealership will commence operation at the new location;   The identity of all existing dealerships in whose relevant market area the new or relocated dealership is to be located; and   The names and addresses of the dealer and principals in the new or relocated dealership.     (Code 1981, §13-8-15.1, enacted by Ga. L. 2002, p. 1101, § 1.)