reglab/housing_qa huggingface dataset:
WA Rev Code § 69.04.060 (2021)
2021 Revised Code of Washington|Title 69 - Food, Drugs, Cosmetics, and Poisons|Chapter 69.04 - Intrastate Commerce in Drugs and Cosmetics.|69.04.060 - Criminal penalty for violations.

RCW 69.04.060 Criminal penalty for violations.Except as otherwise provided in this chapter, any person who violates any provision of RCW 69.04.040 is guilty of a misdemeanor and shall on conviction thereof be subject to the following penalties:(1) A fine of not more than two hundred dollars; or(2) If the violation is committed after a conviction of such person under this section has become final, imprisonment for not more than thirty days, or a fine of not more than five hundred dollars, or both such imprisonment and fine.[ 2013 c 290 § 1; 2003 c 53 § 314; 1945 c 257 § 24; Rem. Supp. 1945 § 6163-73. Prior: 1907 c 211 § 12; 1901 c 94 § 11.]NOTES:Intent—Effective date—2003 c 53: See notes following RCW 2.48.180.
WA Rev Code § 69.04.070 (2021)
2021 Revised Code of Washington|Title 69 - Food, Drugs, Cosmetics, and Poisons|Chapter 69.04 - Intrastate Commerce in Drugs and Cosmetics.|69.04.070 - Additional penalty.

RCW 69.04.070 Additional penalty.Notwithstanding the provisions of RCW 69.04.060, a person who violates RCW 69.04.040 with intent to defraud or mislead is guilty of a misdemeanor and the penalty shall be imprisonment for not more than ninety days, or a fine of not more than one thousand dollars, or both such imprisonment and fine.[ 2003 c 53 § 315; 1945 c 257 § 25; Rem. Supp. 1945 § 6163-74.]NOTES:Intent—Effective date—2003 c 53: See notes following RCW 2.48.180.
WA Rev Code § 69.04.080 (2021)
2021 Revised Code of Washington|Title 69 - Food, Drugs, Cosmetics, and Poisons|Chapter 69.04 - Intrastate Commerce in Drugs and Cosmetics.|69.04.080 - Avoidance of penalty.

RCW 69.04.080 Avoidance of penalty.No person shall be subject to the penalties of RCW 69.04.060:(1) For having violated RCW 69.04.040(3), if he or she establishes that he or she received and sold such article in good faith, unless he or she refuses on request of the director to furnish the name and address of the person in the state of Washington from whom he or she received such article and copies of all available documents pertaining to his or her receipt thereof; or(2) For having violated RCW 69.04.040 (1), (3), or (4), if he or she establishes a guaranty or undertaking signed by, and containing the name and address of, the person in the state of Washington from whom he or she received such article in good faith, to the effect that such article complies with this chapter; or(3) For having violated RCW 69.04.040(5), if he or she establishes a guaranty or undertaking signed by, and containing the name and address of, the person in the state of Washington from whom he or she received such advertisement in good faith, to the effect that such advertisement complies with this chapter; or(4) For having violated RCW 69.04.040(9), if he or she establishes that he or she gave such guaranty or undertaking in good faith and in reliance on a guaranty or undertaking to him or her, which guaranty or undertaking was to the same effect and was signed by, and contained the name and address of, a person in the state of Washington.[ 2012 c 117 § 329; 1945 c 257 § 26; Rem. Supp. 1945 § 6163-75.]
WA Rev Code § 69.04.090 (2021)
2021 Revised Code of Washington|Title 69 - Food, Drugs, Cosmetics, and Poisons|Chapter 69.04 - Intrastate Commerce in Drugs and Cosmetics.|69.04.090 - Liability of disseminator of advertisement.

RCW 69.04.090 Liability of disseminator of advertisement.No publisher, radio broadcast licensee, advertising agency, or agency or medium for the dissemination of an advertisement, except the manufacturer, packer, distributor, or seller of the article to which the advertisement relates, shall be subject to the penalties of RCW 69.04.060 by reason of his or her dissemination of any false advertisement, unless he or she has refused on the request of the director to furnish the name and address of the manufacturer, packer, distributor, seller, or advertising agency in the state of Washington, who caused him or her to disseminate such false advertisement.[ 2012 c 117 § 330; 1945 c 257 § 27; Rem. Supp. 1945 § 6163-76.]
WA Rev Code § 69.04.100 (2021)
2021 Revised Code of Washington|Title 69 - Food, Drugs, Cosmetics, and Poisons|Chapter 69.04 - Intrastate Commerce in Drugs and Cosmetics.|69.04.100 - Condemnation of adulterated or misbranded article.

RCW 69.04.100 Condemnation of adulterated or misbranded article.Whenever the director shall find in intrastate commerce an article subject to this chapter which is so adulterated or misbranded that it is unfit or unsafe for human use and its immediate condemnation is required to protect the public health, such article is hereby declared to be a nuisance and the director is hereby authorized forthwith to destroy such article or to render it unsalable for human use.[ 1945 c 257 § 28; Rem. Supp. 1945 § 6163-77.]
WA Rev Code § 69.04.110 (2021)
2021 Revised Code of Washington|Title 69 - Food, Drugs, Cosmetics, and Poisons|Chapter 69.04 - Intrastate Commerce in Drugs and Cosmetics.|69.04.110 - Embargo of articles.

RCW 69.04.110 Embargo of articles.Whenever the director shall find, or shall have probable cause to believe, that an article subject to this chapter is in intrastate commerce in violation of this chapter, and that its embargo under this section is required to protect the consuming or purchasing public, due to its being adulterated or misbranded, or to otherwise protect the public from injury, or possible injury, he or she is hereby authorized to affix to such article a notice of its embargo and against its sale in intrastate commerce, without permission given under this chapter. But if, after such article has been so embargoed, the director shall find that such article does not involve a violation of this chapter, such embargo shall be forthwith removed.[ 1991 c 162 § 3; 1975 1st ex.s. c 7 § 25; 1945 c 257 § 29; Rem. Supp. 1945 § 6163-78.]
WA Rev Code § 69.04.120 (2021)
2021 Revised Code of Washington|Title 69 - Food, Drugs, Cosmetics, and Poisons|Chapter 69.04 - Intrastate Commerce in Drugs and Cosmetics.|69.04.120 - Procedure on embargo.

RCW 69.04.120 Procedure on embargo.When the director has embargoed an article, he or she shall, forthwith and without delay and in no event later than thirty days after the affixing of notice of its embargo, petition the superior court for an order affirming the embargo. The court then has jurisdiction, for cause shown and after prompt hearing to any claimant of the embargoed article, to issue an order which directs the removal of the embargo or the destruction or the correction and release of the article. An order for destruction or correction and release shall contain such provision for the payment of pertinent court costs and fees and administrative expenses as is equitable and which the court deems appropriate in the circumstances. An order for correction and release may contain such provision for a bond as the court finds indicated in the circumstances.[ 1991 c 162 § 4; 1983 c 95 § 8; 1945 c 257 § 30; Rem. Supp. 1945 § 6163-79.]
WA Rev Code § 69.04.130 (2021)
2021 Revised Code of Washington|Title 69 - Food, Drugs, Cosmetics, and Poisons|Chapter 69.04 - Intrastate Commerce in Drugs and Cosmetics.|69.04.130 - Petitions may be consolidated.

RCW 69.04.130 Petitions may be consolidated.Two or more petitions under RCW 69.04.120, which pend at the same time and which present the same issue and claimant hereunder, shall be consolidated for simultaneous determination by one court of jurisdiction, upon application to any court of jurisdiction by the director or by such claimant.[ 1945 c 257 § 31; Rem. Supp. 1945 § 6163-80.]
WA Rev Code § 69.04.140 (2021)
2021 Revised Code of Washington|Title 69 - Food, Drugs, Cosmetics, and Poisons|Chapter 69.04 - Intrastate Commerce in Drugs and Cosmetics.|69.04.140 - Claimant entitled to sample.

RCW 69.04.140 Claimant entitled to sample.The claimant in any proceeding by petition under RCW 69.04.120 shall be entitled to receive a representative sample of the article subject to such proceeding, upon application to the court of jurisdiction made at any time after such petition and prior to the hearing thereon.[ 1945 c 257 § 32; Rem. Supp. 1945 § 6163-81.]
WA Rev Code § 69.04.150 (2021)
2021 Revised Code of Washington|Title 69 - Food, Drugs, Cosmetics, and Poisons|Chapter 69.04 - Intrastate Commerce in Drugs and Cosmetics.|69.04.150 - Damages not recoverable if probable cause existed.

RCW 69.04.150 Damages not recoverable if probable cause existed.No state court shall allow the recovery of damages from administrative action for condemnation under RCW 69.04.100 or for embargo under RCW 69.04.110, if the court finds that there was probable cause for such action.[ 1945 c 257 § 33; Rem. Supp. 1945 § 6163-82.]
WA Rev Code § 69.04.160 (2021)
2021 Revised Code of Washington|Title 69 - Food, Drugs, Cosmetics, and Poisons|Chapter 69.04 - Intrastate Commerce in Drugs and Cosmetics.|69.04.160 - Prosecutions.

RCW 69.04.160 Prosecutions.(1) It shall be the duty of each state attorney, county attorney, or city attorney to whom the director reports any violation of this chapter, or regulations promulgated under it, to cause appropriate proceedings to be instituted in the proper courts, without delay, and to be duly prosecuted as prescribed by law.(2) Before any violation of this chapter is reported by the director to any such attorney for the institution of a criminal proceeding, the person against whom such proceeding is contemplated shall be given appropriate notice and an opportunity to present his or her views to the director, either orally or in writing, with regard to such contemplated proceeding.[ 2012 c 117 § 331; 1945 c 257 § 34; Rem. Supp. 1945 § 6163-83.]
WA Rev Code § 69.04.170 (2021)
2021 Revised Code of Washington|Title 69 - Food, Drugs, Cosmetics, and Poisons|Chapter 69.04 - Intrastate Commerce in Drugs and Cosmetics.|69.04.170 - Minor infractions.

RCW 69.04.170 Minor infractions.Nothing in this chapter shall be construed as requiring the director to report for the institution of proceedings under this chapter, minor violations of this chapter, whenever he or she believes that the public interest will be adequately served in the circumstances by a suitable written notice or warning.[ 2012 c 117 § 332; 1945 c 257 § 35; Rem. Supp. 1945 § 6163-84.]
WA Rev Code § 69.04.180 (2021)
2021 Revised Code of Washington|Title 69 - Food, Drugs, Cosmetics, and Poisons|Chapter 69.04 - Intrastate Commerce in Drugs and Cosmetics.|69.04.180 - Proceedings to be in name of state.

RCW 69.04.180 Proceedings to be in name of state.All such proceedings for the enforcement, or to restrain violations, of this chapter shall be by and in the name of the state of Washington.[ 1945 c 257 § 36; Rem. Supp. 1945 § 6163-85.]
WA Rev Code § 69.04.370 (2021)
2021 Revised Code of Washington|Title 69 - Food, Drugs, Cosmetics, and Poisons|Chapter 69.04 - Intrastate Commerce in Drugs and Cosmetics.|69.04.370 - Right of access for inspection.

RCW 69.04.370 Right of access for inspection.Any officer or employee duly designated by the director shall have access to any factory or establishment, the operator of which holds a permit from the director, for the purpose of ascertaining whether or not the conditions of the permit are being complied with, and denial of access for such inspection shall be ground for suspension of the permit until such access is freely given by the operator.[ 1945 c 257 § 55; Rem. Supp. 1945 § 6163-104.]
WA Rev Code § 69.04.410 (2021)
2021 Revised Code of Washington|Title 69 - Food, Drugs, Cosmetics, and Poisons|Chapter 69.04 - Intrastate Commerce in Drugs and Cosmetics.|69.04.410 - Drugs—Adulteration by harmful substances.

RCW 69.04.410 Drugs—Adulteration by harmful substances.A drug or device shall be deemed to be adulterated (1) if it consists in whole or in part of any filthy, putrid, or decomposed substance; or (2) if it has been produced, prepared, packed, or held under insanitary conditions whereby it may have been contaminated with filth, or whereby it may have been rendered injurious to health; or (3) if it is a drug and its container is composed in whole or in part of any poisonous or deleterious substance which may render the contents injurious to health; or (4) if it is a drug and it bears or contains, for purposes of coloring only, a coal tar color other than one that is harmless and suitable for use in drugs for such purposes, as provided by regulations promulgated under section 504 of the federal act.[ 1945 c 257 § 59; Rem. Supp. 1945 § 6163-108. Prior: 1923 c 36 § 1; 1907 c 211 § 3; 1901 c 94 § 3.]
WA Rev Code § 69.04.420 (2021)
2021 Revised Code of Washington|Title 69 - Food, Drugs, Cosmetics, and Poisons|Chapter 69.04 - Intrastate Commerce in Drugs and Cosmetics.|69.04.420 - Drugs—Adulteration for failure to comply with compendium standard.

RCW 69.04.420 Drugs—Adulteration for failure to comply with compendium standard.If a drug or device purports to be or is represented as a drug the name of which is recognized in an official compendium, and its strength differs from, or its quality or purity falls below, the standard set forth in such compendium, it shall be deemed to be adulterated. Such determination as to strength, quality or purity shall be made in accordance with the tests or methods of assay set forth in such compendium or prescribed by regulations promulgated under section 501(b) of the federal act. No drug defined in an official compendium shall be deemed to be adulterated under this section because it differs from the standard of strength, quality, or purity therefor set forth in such compendium, if its difference in strength, quality, or purity from such standard is plainly stated on its label. Whenever a drug is recognized in both the United States pharmacopoeia and the homeopathic pharmacopoeia of the United States, it shall be subject to the requirements of the United States pharmacopoeia unless it is labeled and offered for sale as a homeopathic drug, in which case it shall be subject to the provisions of the homeopathic pharmacopoeia of the United States and not to those of the United States pharmacopoeia.[ 1945 c 257 § 60; Rem. Supp. 1945 § 6163-109.]
WA Rev Code § 69.04.430 (2021)
2021 Revised Code of Washington|Title 69 - Food, Drugs, Cosmetics, and Poisons|Chapter 69.04 - Intrastate Commerce in Drugs and Cosmetics.|69.04.430 - Drugs—Adulteration for lack of represented purity or quality.

RCW 69.04.430 Drugs—Adulteration for lack of represented purity or quality.If a drug or device is not subject to the provisions of RCW 69.04.420 and its strength differs from, or its purity or quality falls below, that which it purports or is represented to possess, it shall be deemed to be adulterated.[ 1945 c 257 § 61; Rem. Supp. 1945 § 6163-110.]
WA Rev Code § 69.04.440 (2021)
2021 Revised Code of Washington|Title 69 - Food, Drugs, Cosmetics, and Poisons|Chapter 69.04 - Intrastate Commerce in Drugs and Cosmetics.|69.04.440 - Drugs—Adulteration by admixture or substitution of ingredients.

RCW 69.04.440 Drugs—Adulteration by admixture or substitution of ingredients.A drug shall be deemed to be adulterated if any substance has been (1) mixed or packed therewith so as to reduce its quality or strength or (2) substituted wholly or in part therefor.[ 1945 c 257 § 62; Rem. Supp. 1945 § 6163-111.]
WA Rev Code § 69.04.450 (2021)
2021 Revised Code of Washington|Title 69 - Food, Drugs, Cosmetics, and Poisons|Chapter 69.04 - Intrastate Commerce in Drugs and Cosmetics.|69.04.450 - Drugs—Misbranding by false labeling.

RCW 69.04.450 Drugs—Misbranding by false labeling.A drug or device shall be deemed to be misbranded if its labeling is false or misleading in any particular.[ 1945 c 257 § 63; Rem. Supp. 1945 § 6163-112. Prior: 1923 c 36 § 2; 1907 c 211 § 4.]
WA Rev Code § 69.04.460 (2021)
2021 Revised Code of Washington|Title 69 - Food, Drugs, Cosmetics, and Poisons|Chapter 69.04 - Intrastate Commerce in Drugs and Cosmetics.|69.04.460 - Packaged drugs—Misbranding.

RCW 69.04.460 Packaged drugs—Misbranding.If a drug or device is in package form, it shall be deemed to be misbranded unless it bears a label containing (1) the name and place of business of the manufacturer, packer, or distributor; and (2) an accurate statement of the quantity of the contents in terms of weight, measure, or numerical count: PROVIDED, That under clause (2) of this section reasonable variations shall be permitted, and exemptions as to small packages shall be established, by regulations promulgated by the director.[ 1945 c 257 § 64; Rem. Supp. 1945 § 6163-113. Prior: 1923 c 36 § 2; 1907 c 211 § 4.]
WA Rev Code § 69.04.470 (2021)
2021 Revised Code of Washington|Title 69 - Food, Drugs, Cosmetics, and Poisons|Chapter 69.04 - Intrastate Commerce in Drugs and Cosmetics.|69.04.470 - Drugs—Misbranding by lack of prominent label.

RCW 69.04.470 Drugs—Misbranding by lack of prominent label.A drug or device shall be deemed to be misbranded if any word, statement, or other information required by or under authority of this chapter to appear on the label or labeling is not prominently placed thereon with such conspicuousness (as compared with other words, statements, designs, or devices, in the labeling) and in such terms as to render it likely to be read and understood by the ordinary individual under customary conditions of purchase and use.[ 1945 c 257 § 65; Rem. Supp. 1945 § 6163-114. Prior: 1923 c 36 § 2; 1907 c 211 § 4.]
WA Rev Code § 69.04.480 (2021)
2021 Revised Code of Washington|Title 69 - Food, Drugs, Cosmetics, and Poisons|Chapter 69.04 - Intrastate Commerce in Drugs and Cosmetics.|69.04.480 - Drugs—Misbranding for failure to state content of habit forming drug.

RCW 69.04.480 Drugs—Misbranding for failure to state content of habit forming drug.A drug or device shall be deemed to be misbranded if it is for use by human beings and contains any quantity of the narcotic or hypnotic substance alpha eucaine, barbituric acid, beta eucaine, bromal, cannabis, carbromal, chloral, coca, cocaine, codeine, heroin, marijuana, morphine, opium, paraldehyde, peyote, or sulphomethane; or any chemical derivative of such substance, which derivative has been designated as habit forming by regulations promulgated under section 502(d) of the federal act; unless its label bears the name and quantity or proportion of such substance or derivative and in juxtaposition therewith the statement "Warning—May be habit forming."[ 2009 c 549 § 1023; 1945 c 257 § 66; Rem. Supp. 1945 § 6163-115. Prior: 1923 c 36 § 2; 1907 c 211 § 4.]
WA Rev Code § 69.04.490 (2021)
2021 Revised Code of Washington|Title 69 - Food, Drugs, Cosmetics, and Poisons|Chapter 69.04 - Intrastate Commerce in Drugs and Cosmetics.|69.04.490 - Drugs—Misbranding by failure to show usual name and ingredients.

RCW 69.04.490 Drugs—Misbranding by failure to show usual name and ingredients.If a drug is not designated solely by a name recognized in an official compendium it shall be deemed to be misbranded unless its label bears (1) the common or usual name of the drug, if such there be; and (2), in case it is fabricated from two or more ingredients, the common or usual name of each active ingredient, including the quantity, kind, and proportion of any alcohol, and also including, whether active or not, the name and quantity or proportion of any bromides, ether, chloroform, acetanilid, acetphenetidin, amidopyrine, antipyrine, atropine, hyoscine, hyoscyamime, arsenic, digitalis, glucosides, mercury, ouabain, strophanthin, strychnine, thyroid, or any derivative or preparation of any such substances, contained therein: PROVIDED, That to the extent that compliance with the requirements of clause (2) of this section is impracticable, exemptions shall be established by regulations promulgated by the director.[ 1945 c 257 § 67; Rem. Supp. 1945 § 6163-116. Prior: 1923 c 36 § 2; 1907 c 211 § 4.]
WA Rev Code § 69.04.500 (2021)
2021 Revised Code of Washington|Title 69 - Food, Drugs, Cosmetics, and Poisons|Chapter 69.04 - Intrastate Commerce in Drugs and Cosmetics.|69.04.500 - Drugs—Misbranding by failure to give directions for use and warnings.

RCW 69.04.500 Drugs—Misbranding by failure to give directions for use and warnings.A drug or device shall be deemed to be misbranded unless its labeling bears (1) adequate directions for use; and (2) such adequate warnings against use in those pathological conditions or by children where its use may be dangerous to health, or against unsafe dosage or methods or duration of administration or application, in such manner and form, as are necessary for the protection of users: PROVIDED, That where any requirement of clause (1) of this section as applied to any drug or device, is not necessary for the protection of the public health, the director shall promulgate regulations exempting such drug or device from such requirements. Such regulations shall include the exemptions prescribed under section 502(f)(1) of the federal act, insofar as such exemptions are applicable hereunder.[ 1945 c 257 § 68; Rem. Supp. 1945 § 6163-117. Prior: 1923 c 36 § 2; 1907 c 211 § 4.]
WA Rev Code § 69.04.510 (2021)
2021 Revised Code of Washington|Title 69 - Food, Drugs, Cosmetics, and Poisons|Chapter 69.04 - Intrastate Commerce in Drugs and Cosmetics.|69.04.510 - Drugs—Misbranding for improper packaging and labeling.

RCW 69.04.510 Drugs—Misbranding for improper packaging and labeling.A drug or device shall be deemed to be misbranded if it purports to be a drug the name of which is recognized in an official compendium, unless it is packaged and labeled as prescribed therein: PROVIDED, That the method of packing may be modified with the consent of the director, as permitted under section 502(g) of the federal act. Whenever a drug is recognized in both the United States pharmacopoeia and the homeopathic pharmacopoeia of the United States, it shall be subject to the requirements of the United States pharmacopoeia with respect to packaging and labeling unless it is labeled and offered for sale as a homeopathic drug, in which case it shall be subject to the provisions of the homeopathic pharmacopoeia of the United States, and not to those of the United States pharmacopoeia.[ 1945 c 257 § 69; Rem. Supp. 1945 § 6163-118. Prior: 1923 c 36 § 2; 1907 c 211 § 4.]
WA Rev Code § 69.04.520 (2021)
2021 Revised Code of Washington|Title 69 - Food, Drugs, Cosmetics, and Poisons|Chapter 69.04 - Intrastate Commerce in Drugs and Cosmetics.|69.04.520 - Drugs—Misbranding for failure to show possibility of deterioration.

RCW 69.04.520 Drugs—Misbranding for failure to show possibility of deterioration.If a drug or device has been found by the secretary of agriculture of the United States to be a drug liable to deterioration, it shall be deemed to be misbranded unless it is packaged in such form and manner, and its label bears a statement of such precautions, as required in an official compendium or by regulations promulgated under section 502(h) of the federal act for the protection of the public health.[ 1945 c 257 § 70; Rem. Supp. 1945 § 6163-119. Prior: 1923 c 36 § 2; 1907 c 211 § 4.]
WA Rev Code § 69.04.530 (2021)
2021 Revised Code of Washington|Title 69 - Food, Drugs, Cosmetics, and Poisons|Chapter 69.04 - Intrastate Commerce in Drugs and Cosmetics.|69.04.530 - Drugs—Misbranding by misleading representation.

RCW 69.04.530 Drugs—Misbranding by misleading representation.A drug shall be deemed to be misbranded if (1) its container is so made, formed, or filled as to be misleading; or (2) if it is an imitation of another drug; or (3) if it is offered for sale under the name of another drug; or (4) if it is dangerous to health when used in the dosage, or with the frequency or duration prescribed, recommended, or suggested in the labeling thereof.[ 1945 c 257 § 71; Rem. Supp. 1945 § 6163-120. Prior: 1923 c 36 § 2; 1907 c 211 § 4.]