reglab/housing_qa huggingface dataset:
CO Code § 13-81-102 (2021)
2021 Colorado Code|Title 13 - Courts and Court Procedure|Article 81 - Limitations - Persons Under Disability|§ 13-81-102. Right of Legal Representative

  When there is a legal representative appointed for a person under disability, all rights to take action, except rights of the person under disability against the legal representative himself or herself, vest in said legal representative for the benefit of the person under disability, and the legal representative has authority to take action thereon in his or her own name.    A legal representative may:   Elect, on behalf of a plaintiff in a civil action, a form of funding of a judgment for periodic payments, as described in section 13-64-207;    Elect to receive the immediate payment to the plaintiff of the present value of the future damage award in a lump-sum amount, in lieu of periodic payments;    Petition a court of competent jurisdiction to establish a disability trust pursuant to section 15-14-412.8, C.R.S., funded by the proceeds of a settlement or judgment received by, or on behalf of, a person under disability who is under sixty-five years of age and who is disabled, as defined in Title XIX of the federal “Social Security Act”, 42 U.S.C. sec. 1382c (a)(3); or    Petition a court of competent jurisdiction to establish a pooled trust account pursuant to section 15-14-412.9, C.R.S., funded by the proceeds of a settlement or judgment received by, or on behalf of, a person under disability who is disabled, as defined in Title XIX of the federal “Social Security Act”, 42 U.S.C. sec. 1382c (a)(3).        History. Source: L. 39: P. 449, § 2. CSA: C. 102, § 29. CRS 53: § 87-3-2. C.R.S. 1963: § 87-2-2. L. 2007: Entire section amended, p. 172, § 4, effective August 3. History. Source: L. 39: P. 449, § 2. CSA: C. 102, § 29. CRS 53: § 87-3-2. C.R.S. 1963: § 87-2-2. L. 2007: Entire section amended, p. 172, § 4, effective August 3.    Cross references:   For the legislative declaration contained in the 2007 act amending this section, see section 1 of chapter 49, Session Laws of Colorado 2007.   ANNOTATION   Law reviews. For article, “What Constitutes ‘Benefits' for Urban Drainage Projects”, see 51 Den. L.J. 551 (1974).
CO Code § 13-81-104 (2021)
2021 Colorado Code|Title 13 - Courts and Court Procedure|Article 81 - Limitations - Persons Under Disability|§ 13-81-104. Right of Trustee

 If by virtue of any agreement, trust indenture, will, or other instrument in writing a trustee or other representative is or has been designated and appointed for any such person under disability and by the terms of such agreement, trust indenture, will, or other instrument in writing said trustee or other representative is vested with the right and power to take action, then the right to take action for any right which a person under disability may have arising in any way from said trust or agency shall vest in the trustee or other representative, and the applicable statute of limitations shall run against such person under disability and against such trustee or other representative as to all rights to take such action in the same manner, for the same period, and with the same effect as it runs against persons not under disability. After the expiration of the period fixed by such applicable statute of limitations, neither the person under disability, nor his trustee or other representative, nor anyone for him shall be permitted or allowed to take action based on any such right.   History. Source: L. 39: P. 450, § 4. CSA: C. 102, § 31. CRS 53: § 87-3-4. C.R.S. 1963: § 87-2-4. History. Source: L. 39: P. 450, § 4. CSA: C. 102, § 31. CRS 53: § 87-3-4. C.R.S. 1963: § 87-2-4.
CO Code § 13-81-105 (2021)
2021 Colorado Code|Title 13 - Courts and Court Procedure|Article 81 - Limitations - Persons Under Disability|§ 13-81-105. Failure of Trustee to Take Action

 When a legal representative, or trustee, or other representative appointed under any agreement, trust indenture, will, or other instrument in writing has been duly appointed for any person under disability and such legal representative, or trustee, or other representative does not promptly, after demand therefor by the person under disability or anyone for him, take action, then such person under disability by next friend may take action before the expiration of the periods fixed in this article for the taking of such action by any person under disability, or his legal representative, or trustee, or other representative, but not thereafter.   History. Source: L. 39: P. 451, § 5. CSA: C. 102, § 32. CRS 53: § 87-3-5. C.R.S. 1963: § 87-2-5. History. Source: L. 39: P. 451, § 5. CSA: C. 102, § 32. CRS 53: § 87-3-5. C.R.S. 1963: § 87-2-5.
CO Code § 13-81-106 (2021)
2021 Colorado Code|Title 13 - Courts and Court Procedure|Article 81 - Limitations - Persons Under Disability|§ 13-81-106. Removal of Disability - Effect

 If before the expiration of the period fixed by the applicable statute of limitations the disability of any person under disability is removed, the fact of such removal shall not in any way affect or stop the running of the applicable statute of limitations, except as provided in section 13-81-103 (1)(c) .   History. Source: L. 39: P. 451, § 6. CSA: C. 102, § 33. CRS 53: § 87-3-6. C.R.S. 1963: § 87-2-6. History. Source: L. 39: P. 451, § 6. CSA: C. 102, § 33. CRS 53: § 87-3-6. C.R.S. 1963: § 87-2-6.    ANNOTATION   Applied in In re Estate of Daigle, 634 P.2d 71 (Colo. 1981).
CO Code § 13-81-107 (2021)
2021 Colorado Code|Title 13 - Courts and Court Procedure|Article 81 - Limitations - Persons Under Disability|§ 13-81-107. Action Prosecuted to Final Decision

 If any action or proceeding is begun within the period fixed by the applicable statute of limitations or the periods provided for in this article, then such action or proceeding may be prosecuted to final decision notwithstanding the fact that the period of limitation shall expire after the commencement and during the prosecution of such action or proceeding.   History. Source: L. 39: P. 451, § 7. CSA: C. 102, § 34. CRS 53: § 87-3-7. C.R.S. 1963: § 87-2-7. History. Source: L. 39: P. 451, § 7. CSA: C. 102, § 34. CRS 53: § 87-3-7. C.R.S. 1963: § 87-2-7.
CO Code § 13-82-101 (2021)
2021 Colorado Code|Title 13 - Courts and Court Procedure|Article 82 - Uniform Conflict of Laws - Limitation Periods|§ 13-82-101. Short Title

 This article shall be known and may be cited as the “Uniform Conflict of Laws - Limitations Act”.   History. Source: L. 84: Entire article added, p. 477, § 1, effective July 1.    ANNOTATION   This article effectively treats limitation periods as substantive law. Mtn. States Adjustment v. Cooke, 2016 COA 80 , 412 P.3d 819.
CO Code § 13-82-102 (2021)
2021 Colorado Code|Title 13 - Courts and Court Procedure|Article 82 - Uniform Conflict of Laws - Limitation Periods|§ 13-82-102. Uniformity of Application and Construction

 This article shall be applied and construed to effectuate its general purpose to make uniform the law with respect to the subject of this article among states enacting it.   History. Source: L. 84: Entire article added, p. 477, § 1, effective July 1.    ANNOTATION   Neither § 13-80-110 nor the Uniform Conflict of Laws - Limitations Act (UCL-LA) is more specific than the other. Because each statute uses different factors to assign a limitations period, the court is prevented from directly comparing them in order to read one as an exception to the other. Jenkins v. Pan. Canal Ry. Co., 208 P.3d 238 (Colo. 2009).   Because it was enacted more recently, § 13-80-110 and not the UCL-LA, controls. Based on the general assembly's prescribed rules of statutory construction, because the conflicts between the statutes cannot be resolved on specificity and the borrowing statute is the more recent enactment, the borrowing statute applies to the plaintiffs' claims. Jenkins v. Pan. Canal Ry. Co., 208 P.3d 238 (Colo. 2009).
CO Code § 13-82-103 (2021)
2021 Colorado Code|Title 13 - Courts and Court Procedure|Article 82 - Uniform Conflict of Laws - Limitation Periods|§ 13-82-103. Definitions

 As used in this article, unless the context otherwise requires:    “Claim” means a right of action that may be asserted in a civil action or proceeding and includes a right of action created by statute.    “State” means a state, commonwealth, territory, or possession of the United States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, a foreign country, or a political subdivision of any of them.     History. Source: L. 84: Entire article added, p. 477, § 1, effective July 1.
CO Code § 13-82-104 (2021)
2021 Colorado Code|Title 13 - Courts and Court Procedure|Article 82 - Uniform Conflict of Laws - Limitation Periods|§ 13-82-104. Conflict of Laws - Limitation Periods

  Except as provided in section 13-82-106, if a claim is substantively based:   Upon the law of one other state, the limitation period of that state applies; or    Upon the law of more than one state, the limitation period of one of those states chosen by the law of conflict of laws of this state applies.       The limitation period of this state applies to all other claims.     History. Source: L. 84: Entire article added, p. 477, § 1, effective July 1.    ANNOTATION   Applied in Brown v. Globe Union, Div. of Johnson Controls, 661 F. Supp. 1188 (D. Colo. 1987 ); Mtn. States Adjustment v. Cooke, 2016 COA 80 , 412 P.3d 819.
CO Code § 13-82-105 (2021)
2021 Colorado Code|Title 13 - Courts and Court Procedure|Article 82 - Uniform Conflict of Laws - Limitation Periods|§ 13-82-105. Rules Applicable to Computation of Limitation Period

 If the statute of limitations of another state applies to the assertion of a claim in this state, the other state's relevant statutes and other rules of law governing tolling and accrual apply in computing the limitation period, but its statutes and other rules of law governing conflict of laws do not apply.   History. Source: L. 84: Entire article added, p. 478, § 1, effective July 1.
CO Code § 13-82-106 (2021)
2021 Colorado Code|Title 13 - Courts and Court Procedure|Article 82 - Uniform Conflict of Laws - Limitation Periods|§ 13-82-106. Unfairness

 If the court determines that the limitation period of another state applicable under sections 13-82-104 and 13-82-105 is substantially different from the limitation period of this state and has not afforded a fair opportunity to sue upon or imposes an unfair burden in defending against the claim, the limitation period of this state applies.   History. Source: L. 84: Entire article added, p. 478, § 1, effective July 1.    ANNOTATION   Where length of foreign government's statute of limitations was not so fundamentally unfair or unjust as to be repugnant to Colorado's public policy, section does not provide a basis for non-recognition of a final, conclusive foreign judgment. Milhoux v. Linder, 902 P.2d 856 (Colo. App. 1995).   The plain language of this section limits its applicability to cases in which a court determines under the Uniform Conflict of Laws-Limitations Act (and not § 13-80-110 ) that a claim is barred by the limitations period of another state. Jenkins v. Haymore, 208 P.3d 265 (Colo. App. 2007), aff'd, 208 P.3d 238 (Colo. 2009).   Contractual choice-of-law provision was clear and unambiguous that the state in which plaintiff's predecessor in interest was headquartered when the contract was executed was the parties' designation as their choice-of-law state. Mtn. States Adjustment v. Cooke, 2016 COA 80 , 412 P.3d 819.   The fact that a contractual choice-of-law provision does not include words such as “shall”, “exclusively”, or “only” does not necessarily make the provision permissive; no specific language is required to make such a provision mandatory. Mtn. States Adjustment v. Cooke, 2016 COA 80 , 412 P.3d 819.
CO Code § 13-82-107 (2021)
2021 Colorado Code|Title 13 - Courts and Court Procedure|Article 82 - Uniform Conflict of Laws - Limitation Periods|§ 13-82-107. Existing and Future Claims

  This article applies to claims:   Accruing after July 1, 1984; or    Asserted in a civil action or proceeding more than one year after July 1, 1984, but it does not revive a claim barred before July 1, 1984.        History. Source: L. 84: Entire article added, p. 478, § 1, effective July 1.
CO Code § 13-85-101 (2021)
2021 Colorado Code|Title 13 - Courts and Court Procedure|Article 85 - Priority of Certain Civil Actions|§ 13-85-101. Legislative Declaration

 The general assembly hereby determines, finds, and declares that traffic congestion and other transportation difficulties in the Denver metropolitan area seriously threaten the public health and welfare. In an effort to reduce air pollution and stimulate the economic development of the Denver metropolitan area, the general assembly has directed the regional transportation district to proceed with the planning, construction, and operation of a fixed guideway mass transit system. Since the success of the mass transit system depends on its prompt construction and commencement of operation, the general assembly finds that it is necessary to avoid any possible delays in such construction and operation. To that end, the general assembly further finds that the trial of lawsuits arising out of the planning, development, financing, or construction of these projects should be given priority in the district and appellate courts of this state.   History. Source: L. 88: Entire article added, p. 628, § 1, effective July 1. L. 93: Entire section amended, p. 1775, § 34, effective June 6.
CO Code § 13-85-102 (2021)
2021 Colorado Code|Title 13 - Courts and Court Procedure|Article 85 - Priority of Certain Civil Actions|§ 13-85-102. Definitions

 As used in this article, unless the context otherwise requires:    “Fixed guideway mass transit system” means the fixed guideway mass transit system authorized by section 32-9-107.5, C.R.S.    Repealed.    “Regional transportation district” means the regional transportation district established by article 9 of title 32, C.R.S.    Repealed.     History. Source: L. 88: Entire article added, p. 628, § 1, effective July 1. L. 94: (2) and (4) repealed, p. 1325, § 5, effective May 25.
CO Code § 13-85-103 (2021)
2021 Colorado Code|Title 13 - Courts and Court Procedure|Article 85 - Priority of Certain Civil Actions|§ 13-85-103. Civil Actions Entitled to Priority

 The trial of all civil actions pertaining to or arising out of the planning, development, financing, or construction of the mass transportation system in the Denver metropolitan area, or any election pertaining to said project, or any action against or pertaining to the authority of the regional transportation district to plan, develop, finance, or construct said system shall be entitled to priority in the county and district courts of this state.   History. Source: L. 88: Entire article added, p. 629, § 1, effective July 1. L. 93: Entire section amended, p. 1776, § 35, effective June 6. L. 94: Entire section amended, p. 1325, § 6, effective May 25.
CO Code § 13-85-104 (2021)
2021 Colorado Code|Title 13 - Courts and Court Procedure|Article 85 - Priority of Certain Civil Actions|§ 13-85-104. Appellate Review of Certain Actions Entitled to Priority

 Appellate review in the district court, court of appeals, and supreme court of those actions entitled to priority pursuant to section 13-85-103 shall be entitled to priority in said courts.   History. Source: L. 88: Entire article added, p. 629, § 1, effective July 1.
CO Code § 13-90.5-101 (2021)
2021 Colorado Code|Title 13 - Courts and Court Procedure|Article 90.5 - Uniform Interstate Depositions and Discovery Act|§ 13-90.5-101. Short Title

 This article may be cited as the “Uniform Interstate Depositions and Discovery Act”.   History. Source: L. 2008: Entire article added, p. 196, § 1, effective August 5.
CO Code § 13-90.5-102 (2021)
2021 Colorado Code|Title 13 - Courts and Court Procedure|Article 90.5 - Uniform Interstate Depositions and Discovery Act|§ 13-90.5-102. Definitions

 As used in this article, unless the context otherwise requires:    “Foreign jurisdiction” means a state other than this state.    “Foreign subpoena” means a subpoena issued under authority of a court of record of a foreign jurisdiction.    “Person” means an individual, corporation, business trust, estate, trust, partnership, limited liability company, association, joint venture, public corporation, government, or governmental subdivision, agency or instrumentality, or any other legal or commercial entity.    “State” means a state of the United States, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, the United States Virgin Islands, a federally recognized Indian tribe, or any territory or insular possession subject to the jurisdiction of the United States.    “Subpoena” means a document, however denominated, issued under authority of a court of record requiring a person to:   Attend and give testimony at a deposition;    Produce and permit inspection and copying of designated books, documents, records, electronically stored information, or tangible things in the possession, custody, or control of the person; or    Permit inspection of premises under the control of the person.        History. Source: L. 2008: Entire article added, p. 196, § 1, effective August 5.    OFFICIAL COMMENT   This Act is limited to discovery in state courts, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, the United States Virgin Islands, and the territories of the United States. The committee decided not to extend this Act to include foreign countries including the Canadian provinces. The committee felt that international litigation is sufficiently different and is governed by different principles, so that discovery issues in that arena should be governed by a separate act.   The term “Subpoena” includes a subpoena duces tecum. The description of a subpoena in the Act is based on the language of Rule 45 of the FRCP.   The term “Subpoena” does not include a subpoena for the inspection of a person (subsection (3)(C) is limited to inspection of premises). Medical examinations in a personal injury case, for example, are separately controlled by state discovery rules (the corresponding federal rule is Rule 35 of the FRCP). Since the plaintiff is already subject to the jurisdiction of the trial state, a subpoena is never necessary.
CO Code § 13-90.5-104 (2021)
2021 Colorado Code|Title 13 - Courts and Court Procedure|Article 90.5 - Uniform Interstate Depositions and Discovery Act|§ 13-90.5-104. Service of Subpoena

 A subpoena issued by a clerk of court under section 13-90.5-103 must be served in compliance with section 13-90-115 , rule 45 of the Colorado rules of civil procedure, and any other applicable statutes or rules of this state.   History. Source: L. 2008: Entire article added, p. 197, § 1, effective August 5.
CO Code § 13-90.5-105 (2021)
2021 Colorado Code|Title 13 - Courts and Court Procedure|Article 90.5 - Uniform Interstate Depositions and Discovery Act|§ 13-90.5-105. Deposition, Production, and Inspection

 Section 13-90-112 , rule 37 of the Colorado rules of civil procedure, and any other applicable statutes or rules of this state apply to subpoenas issued under section 13-90.5-103 .   History. Source: L. 2008: Entire article added, p. 197, § 1, effective August 5.    OFFICIAL COMMENT   The Act requires that the discovery permitted by this section must comply with the laws of the discovery state. The discovery state has a significant interest in these cases in protecting its residents who become non-party witnesses in an action pending in a foreign jurisdiction from any unreasonable or unduly burdensome discovery request. Therefore, the committee believes that the discovery procedure must be the same as it would be if the case had originally been filed in the discovery state.   The committee believes that the fee, if any, for issuing a subpoena should be sufficient to cover only the actual transaction costs, or should be the same as the fee for local deposition subpoenas.
CO Code § 13-90.5-106 (2021)
2021 Colorado Code|Title 13 - Courts and Court Procedure|Article 90.5 - Uniform Interstate Depositions and Discovery Act|§ 13-90.5-106. Application to Court

 An application to the court for a protective order or to enforce, quash, or modify a subpoena issued by a clerk of court under section 13-90.5-103 must comply with the rules or statutes of this state and be submitted to the district court for the county in which discovery is to be conducted.   History. Source: L. 2008: Entire article added, p. 197, § 1, effective August 5.    OFFICIAL COMMENT   The act requires that any application to the court for a protective order, or to enforce, quash, or modify a subpoena, or for any other dispute relating to discovery under this Act, must comply with the law of the discovery state. Those laws include the discovery state's procedural, evidentiary, and conflict of laws rules. Again, the discovery state has a significant interest in protecting its residents who become non-party witnesses in an action pending in a foreign jurisdiction from any unreasonable or unduly burdensome discovery requests, and this is easily accomplished by requiring that any discovery motions must be decided under the laws of the discovery state. This protects the deponent by requiring that all applications to the court that directly affect the deponent must be made in the discovery state.   The term “modify” a subpoena means to alter the terms of a subpoena, such as the date, time, or location of a deposition.   Evidentiary issues that may arise, such as objections based on grounds such as relevance or privilege, are best decided in the discovery state under the laws of the discovery state (including its conflict of laws principles).   Nothing in this act limits any party from applying for appropriate relief in the trial state. Applications to the court that affect only the parties to the action can be made in the trial state. For example, any party can apply for an order in the trial state to bar the deposition of the out-of-state deponent on grounds of relevance, and that motion would be made and ruled on before the deposition subpoena is ever presented to the clerk of court in the discovery state.   If a party makes or responds to an application to enforce, quash, or modify a subpoena in the discovery state, the lawyer making or responding to the application must comply with the discovery state's rules governing lawyers appearing in its courts. This act does not change existing state rules governing out-of-state lawyers appearing in its courts. (See Model Rule 5.5 and state rules governing the unauthorized practice of law.)
CO Code § 13-90.5-107 (2021)
2021 Colorado Code|Title 13 - Courts and Court Procedure|Article 90.5 - Uniform Interstate Depositions and Discovery Act|§ 13-90.5-107. Uniformity of Application and Construction

 In applying and construing this uniform act, consideration must be given to the need to promote uniformity of the law with respect to its subject matter among states that enact it.   History. Source: L. 2008: Entire article added, p. 197, § 1, effective August 5.
CO Code § 13-91-101 (2021)
2021 Colorado Code|Title 13 - Courts and Court Procedure|Article 91 - Office of the Child's Representative|§ 13-91-101. Short Title

 This article shall be known and may be cited as the “Office of the Child's Representative Act”.   History. Source: L. 2000: Entire article added, p. 1766, § 1, effective July 1.