reglab/housing_qa huggingface dataset:
CO Code § 13-40-119 (2021)
2021 Colorado Code|Title 13 - Courts and Court Procedure|Article 40 - Forcible Entry and Detainer - General Provisions|§ 13-40-119. Rules of Practice

 In all actions brought under any provision of this article in any court, the proceedings shall be governed by the rules of practice and the provisions of law concerning civil actions in such court, except as may be otherwise provided in this article.   History. Source: L. 1885: P. 230, § 20. R.S. 08: § 2620. C.L. § 6386. CSA: C. 70, § 21. CRS 53: § 58-1-21. L. 61: P. 394, § 8. C.R.S. 1963: § 58-1-21. History. Source: L. 1885: P. 230, § 20. R.S. 08: § 2620. C.L. § 6386. CSA: C. 70, § 21. CRS 53: § 58-1-21. L. 61: P. 394, § 8. C.R.S. 1963: § 58-1-21.    ANNOTATION   Allegations must be supported by proof. The rule which requires that the proof shall support the allegation is as applicable to the action of unlawful detainer as to any other. Klopfer v. Keller, 1 Colo. 410 (1871).   Misjoinder of causes of action must be demurred to in trial court. Objections on the ground that several causes of action have been improperly united, as well as on the ground of misjoinder of parties, must be taken by demurrer or otherwise in the trial court, or they are to be deemed waived. This rule is as applicable to actions for forcible entry and detainer as to other civil actions. Farncomb v. Stern, 18 Colo. 279 , 32 P. 612 (1893).   Evidence tending to disprove the facts stated in the complaint is admissible on the part of the defendant, although such evidence might also tend to prove another case upon which the plaintiff might, if he had so declared, maintain his action. Klopfer v. Keller, 1 Colo. 410 (1871).   Defendant may show he entered premises as purchaser and not as tenant. In an action of unlawful detainer against a tenant holding over, for the purpose of disproving the tenancy, the defendant may show that he entered as a purchaser and not as a tenant, and this whether the agreement to purchase was good or bad. Klopfer v. Keller, 1 Colo. 410 (1871).   A directed verdict may be given. Where, in an action for unlawful detainer, there was no evidence which should have gone to the jury, nor any matter presented for the jury's determination which would deprive the landlord of his right of reentry and possession under the terms of a written lease, the court properly directed a verdict for plaintiff. Mageon v. Alkire, 41 Colo. 338 , 92 P. 720 (1907).
CO Code § 13-40-120 (2021)
2021 Colorado Code|Title 13 - Courts and Court Procedure|Article 40 - Forcible Entry and Detainer - General Provisions|§ 13-40-120. Appellate Review

 Appellate review of the judgment of the district courts of this state, in proceedings under this article, is allowed as provided by law and the Colorado appellate rules. In cases of appeal from judgments founded upon causes of action embraced in section 13-40-104 (1)(d) , the deposit of rent money during pendency of appeal shall be made, or judgment of affirmance shall be entered, in the manner provided in section 13-40-118 .   History. Source: L. 1885: P. 230, § 22. L. 1891: P. 228, § 1. R.S. 08: § 2622. C.L. § 6388. CSA: C. 70, § 23. CRS 53: § 58-1-23. C.R.S. 1963: § 58-1-22. L. 64: P. 472, § 6. L. 84: Entire section amended, p. 467, § 3, effective July 1. L. 85: Entire section amended, p. 571, § 9, effective November 14, 1986. History. Source: L. 1885: P. 230, § 22. L. 1891: P. 228, § 1. R.S. 08: § 2622. C.L. § 6388. CSA: C. 70, § 23. CRS 53: § 58-1-23. C.R.S. 1963: § 58-1-22. L. 64: P. 472, § 6. L. 84: Entire section amended, p. 467, § 3, effective July 1. L. 85: Entire section amended, p. 571, § 9, effective November 14, 1986.    ANNOTATION   Under this section the unsuccessful party may come to the supreme court on appeal or by writ of error. Kilker v. Herrington, 77 Colo. 581 , 238 P. 41 (1925).   Right of appeal is subject to general law regulating appeals. The right of appeal under this statute was held subject to the conditions prescribed by the code of civil procedure, or other general law regulating appeals to the supreme court, and other additional conditions, as provided in this section. Crane v. Farmer, 14 Colo. 294 , 23 P. 455 (1900); Brennan Mercantile Co. v. Vickers, 31 Colo. 323 , 73 P. 45 (1903).   Strict compliance with the statutory requirements is mandated. Morgan v. District Court, 192 Colo. 418 , 559 P.2d 712 (1977).   Act abolishing appeals does not apply to unlawful detainer proceedings. The act “in relation to appeals and writs of error” found in the former code of civil procedure, abolishing appeals, did not apply to, amend, or repeal the detainer act, or other statutes creating special proceedings. Hewitt v. Landis, 75 Colo. 277 , 225 P. 842 (1924).   Applied in Maxwell v. District Court, 641 P.2d 931 (Colo. 1982); Francam Bldg. Corp. v. Fail, 687 P.2d 991 (Colo. App. 1984).
CO Code § 13-40-121 (2021)
2021 Colorado Code|Title 13 - Courts and Court Procedure|Article 40 - Forcible Entry and Detainer - General Provisions|§ 13-40-121. When Deposit of Rent Is Paid

 The rent money deposited, as provided for in this article, shall be paid to the landlord entitled thereto, upon the order of the court wherein the same is deposited and at such time and in such manner as the court determines necessary to protect the rights of the parties.   History. Source: L. 1885: P. 231, § 23. R.S. 08: § 2623. C.L. § 6389. CSA: C. 70, § 24. CRS 53: § 58-1-24. C.R.S. 1963: § 58-1-23. History. Source: L. 1885: P. 231, § 23. R.S. 08: § 2623. C.L. § 6389. CSA: C. 70, § 24. CRS 53: § 58-1-24. C.R.S. 1963: § 58-1-23.
CO Code § 13-40.1-102 (2021)
2021 Colorado Code|Title 13 - Courts and Court Procedure|Article 40.1 - Removal of Unauthorized Persons|§ 13-40.1-102. Unauthorized Alteration or Damage of a Residential Property

  If a person's conduct satisfies all of the elements of section 18-4-501, the person who is removed from a residential property pursuant to section 13-40.1-101 and who knowingly damages the real or personal property of one or more other persons may have committed criminal mischief.    Nothing in this section precludes the prosecution of violations under any other provision of law.     History. Source: L. 2018: Entire article added,(SB 18-015), ch. 393, p. 2350, § 2, effective July 1.
CO Code § 13-45-104 (2021)
2021 Colorado Code|Title 13 - Courts and Court Procedure|Article 45 - Habeas Corpus - General Provisions|§ 13-45-104. Witnesses - Duty of Sheriff

 When a habeas corpus is issued to bring the body of any prisoner committed as aforesaid, unless the court issuing the same deems it wholly unnecessary and useless, the court shall issue a subpoena to the sheriff of the county where said person is confined, commanding him to summon the witnesses therein named to appear before the court at the time and place where such habeas corpus is returnable. It is the duty of the sheriff to serve such subpoena, if it is possible, in time to enable such witnesses to attend. It is the duty of the witnesses thus served with said subpoena to attend and give evidence before the court issuing the same on pain of being deemed guilty of a contempt of court and proceeded against accordingly by said court.   History. Source: R.S. P. 253, § 243. G.L. § 848. G.S. § 989. R.S. 08: § 2920. C.L. § 6489. CSA: C. 77, § 4. CRS 53: § 65-1-4. C.R.S. 1963: § 65-1-4. History. Source: R.S. P. 253, § 243. G.L. § 848. G.S. § 989. R.S. 08: § 2920. C.L. § 6489. CSA: C. 77, § 4. CRS 53: § 65-1-4. C.R.S. 1963: § 65-1-4.
CO Code § 13-45-105 (2021)
2021 Colorado Code|Title 13 - Courts and Court Procedure|Article 45 - Habeas Corpus - General Provisions|§ 13-45-105. Court to Examine Witnesses

 On the hearing of any habeas corpus, it is the duty of the court who hears the same to examine the witnesses aforesaid, and such other witnesses as the prisoner may request, touching any offense named in the warrant of commitment whether or not said offense is technically set out in the commitment.   History. Source: R.S. P. 254, § 244. G.L. § 849. G.S. § 990. R.S. 08: § 2921. C.L. § 6490. CSA: C. 77, § 5. CRS 53: § 65-1-5. C.R.S. 1963: § 65-1-5. History. Source: R.S. P. 254, § 244. G.L. § 849. G.S. § 990. R.S. 08: § 2921. C.L. § 6490. CSA: C. 77, § 5. CRS 53: § 65-1-5. C.R.S. 1963: § 65-1-5.
CO Code § 13-45-107 (2021)
2021 Colorado Code|Title 13 - Courts and Court Procedure|Article 45 - Habeas Corpus - General Provisions|§ 13-45-107. Remand - Second Writ - Offenses Not Bailable

 When any prisoner brought up on a habeas corpus is remanded to prison, it is the duty of the court remanding him to make out and deliver to the sheriff, or other person to whose custody he is remanded, an order in writing stating the cause of remanding him. If such prisoner obtains a second writ of habeas corpus, it is the duty of such sheriff or other person to whom the same is directed to return therewith the order aforesaid. If it appears that the prisoner was remanded for any offense not bailable, it shall be taken and received as conclusive, and the prisoner shall be remanded without further proceedings.   History. Source: R.S. P. 355, § 5. G.L. § 1327. G.S. § 1613. R.S. 08: § 2923. C.L. § 6492. CSA: C. 77, § 7. CRS 53: § 65-1-7. C.R.S. 1963: § 65-1-7. History. Source: R.S. P. 355, § 5. G.L. § 1327. G.S. § 1613. R.S. 08: § 2923. C.L. § 6492. CSA: C. 77, § 7. CRS 53: § 65-1-7. C.R.S. 1963: § 65-1-7.    ANNOTATION   Law reviews. For article, “Enforcement of Justice Court Judgments”, see 12 Dicta 274 (1935).
CO Code § 13-45-108 (2021)
2021 Colorado Code|Title 13 - Courts and Court Procedure|Article 45 - Habeas Corpus - General Provisions|§ 13-45-108. Second Writ - Bailable Offense

 It is unlawful for any court, on a second writ of habeas corpus obtained by the prisoner to discharge the prisoner if he is clearly and specifically charged in the warrant of commitment with a criminal offense; but the court on the return of such second writ has power only to admit such prisoner to bail, where the offense is bailable by law, or remand him to prison where the offense is not bailable or where such prisoner fails to give the bail required.   History. Source: R.S. P. 355, § 6. G.L. § 1328. G.S. § 1614. R.S. 08: § 2924. C.L. § 6493. CSA: C. 77, § 8. CRS 53: § 65-1-8. C.R.S. 1963: § 65-1-8. History. Source: R.S. P. 355, § 6. G.L. § 1328. G.S. § 1614. R.S. 08: § 2924. C.L. § 6493. CSA: C. 77, § 8. CRS 53: § 65-1-8. C.R.S. 1963: § 65-1-8.
CO Code § 13-45-109 (2021)
2021 Colorado Code|Title 13 - Courts and Court Procedure|Article 45 - Habeas Corpus - General Provisions|§ 13-45-109. Once Discharged - Reimprisonment

  No person who has been discharged by order of a court on a habeas corpus shall be again imprisoned, restrained, or kept in custody for the same cause, unless he is afterwards indicted for the same offense or unless by the legal order or process of the court wherein he is bound by recognizance to appear.    The following shall not be deemed to be the same cause:   If, after a discharge for a defect of proof or on any material defect in the commitment in a criminal case, the prisoner is again arrested on sufficient proof and committed by legal process for the same offense;    If, in a civil suit, the party has been discharged for any illegality in the judgment or process and is afterwards imprisoned by legal process for the same cause of action;    Generally, when the discharge has been ordered on account of the nonobservance of any of the forms required by law, the party may be a second time imprisoned if the cause is legal and the forms required by law observed.        History. Source: R.S. P. 355, § 7. G.L. § 1329. G.S. § 1615. R.S. 08: § 2925. C.L. § 6494. CSA: C. 77, § 9. CRS 53: § 65-1-9. C.R.S. 1963: § 65-1-9. History. Source: R.S. P. 355, § 7. G.L. § 1329. G.S. § 1615. R.S. 08: § 2925. C.L. § 6494. CSA: C. 77, § 9. CRS 53: § 65-1-9. C.R.S. 1963: § 65-1-9.    ANNOTATION   When prisoner is discharged by writ of habeas corpus, no court may stay such discharge. Staying a prisoner's discharge by a subsequent order is tantamount to keeping him in custody for the same cause notwithstanding his discharge by a writ of habeas corpus. Such action by a court is forbidden by the law. For it is provided in part by this section that no person who has been discharged by order of a court of judge on a habeas corpus shall be again imprisoned, restrained, or kept in custody for the same cause, unless he be afterwards indicted for the same offense, nor unless by the legal order or process of the court wherein he is bound by recognizance to appear. Geer v. Alaniz, 137 Colo. 432 , 326 P.2d 71 (1958).   The doctrine of res judicata should not be employed to prevent the correction of errors or cure insufficiencies in extradition proceedings. Boyd v. Van Cleave, 180 Colo. 403 , 505 P.2d 1305 (1973).   Or when the facts and issues are different. Generally, whether a discharge on habeas corpus of one held for extradition bars a subsequent extradition proceeding depends on whether the court in the second proceeding is required to pass upon the same or different matters from those ruled upon by the court in the first proceeding; if facts and the issues are different from those raised by the first petition, court is not precluded from reaching a different conclusion than it did on the initial petition. Boyd v. Van Cleave, 180 Colo. 403 , 505 P.2d 1305 (1973).
CO Code § 13-45-110 (2021)
2021 Colorado Code|Title 13 - Courts and Court Procedure|Article 45 - Habeas Corpus - General Provisions|§ 13-45-110. Prisoner Not to Be Removed - When

 To prevent any person from avoiding or delaying his trial, it is unlawful to remove any prisoner on habeas corpus under this article out of the county in which he is confined within fifteen days next preceding the date certain set for trial except if it is to convey him into the county where the offense with which he stands charged is properly cognizable.   History. Source: R.S. P. 356, § 9. G.L. § 1331. G.S. § 1617. R.S. 08: § 2927. C.L. § 6495. CSA: C. 77, § 10. CRS 53: § 65-1-10. C.R.S. 1963: § 65-1-10. History. Source: R.S. P. 356, § 9. G.L. § 1331. G.S. § 1617. R.S. 08: § 2927. C.L. § 6495. CSA: C. 77, § 10. CRS 53: § 65-1-10. C.R.S. 1963: § 65-1-10.
CO Code § 13-45-111 (2021)
2021 Colorado Code|Title 13 - Courts and Court Procedure|Article 45 - Habeas Corpus - General Provisions|§ 13-45-111. Removal of Prisoners - Causes

 Any person committed to any prison or in the custody of any officer, sheriff, jailer, keeper, or other person, or his underofficer or deputy, for any criminal or supposed criminal matter shall not be removed from the prison or custody into any other prison or custody, unless it is by habeas corpus or some other legal writ; or where the prisoner is delivered to some common jail; or is removed from one place to another within the county, in order to effect his discharge or trial in due course of law; or in case of sudden fire, infection, or other necessity; or where the sheriff commits such prisoner to the jail of an adjoining county for the want of a sufficient jail in his own county, as provided in section 17-26-119 , C.R.S.; or where the prisoner, in pursuance of a law of the United States, is claimed or demanded by the executive of the United States or territories. If any person, after such commitment, makes out, signs, or countersigns any warrant for such removal except as before excepted, then he shall forfeit to the prisoner or aggrieved party a sum not exceeding three hundred dollars to be recovered by the prisoner or party aggrieved in the manner provided in section 13-45-117 .   History. Source: R.S. P. 356, § 10. G.L. § 1332. G.S. § 1618. R.S. 08: § 2928. C.L. § 6496. CSA: C. 77, § 11. CRS 53: § 65-1-11. C.R.S. 1963: § 65-1-11. L. 79: Entire section amended, p. 1634, § 23, effective July 19. History. Source: R.S. P. 356, § 10. G.L. § 1332. G.S. § 1618. R.S. 08: § 2928. C.L. § 6496. CSA: C. 77, § 11. CRS 53: § 65-1-11. C.R.S. 1963: § 65-1-11. L. 79: Entire section amended, p. 1634, § 23, effective July 19.    ANNOTATION   This section and § 13-45-117 have to do with the improper removal of a prisoner from a county jail and providing for the forfeiture to such an aggrieved party of a sum not to exceed $300. Kostal v. People, 160 Colo. 64 , 414 P.2d 123, cert. denied, 385 U.S. 939, 87 S. Ct. 305, 17 L. Ed. 2d 218 (1966).   Common jail given its ordinary meaning. Usage of “common jail” was to distinguish the numerous municipal and county jails from state-operated correctional institutions. Kinney v. Young, 689 P.2d 614 (Colo. 1984).
CO Code § 13-45-112 (2021)
2021 Colorado Code|Title 13 - Courts and Court Procedure|Article 45 - Habeas Corpus - General Provisions|§ 13-45-112. Judge Refusing or Delaying Writ - Penalty

 Any judge of a court empowered by this article to issue writs of habeas corpus who corruptly refuses to issue such writ when legally applied for in a case where such writ may lawfully issue or who, for the purpose of oppression, unreasonably delays the issuing of such writ shall for every such offense forfeit to the prisoner or party aggrieved a sum not exceeding five hundred dollars.   History. Source: R.S. P. 356, § 11. G.L. § 1333. G.S. § 1619. R.S. 08: § 2929. C.L. § 6497. CSA: C. 77, § 12. CRS 53: § 65-1-12. C.R.S. 1963: § 65-1-12. History. Source: R.S. P. 356, § 11. G.L. § 1333. G.S. § 1619. R.S. 08: § 2929. C.L. § 6497. CSA: C. 77, § 12. CRS 53: § 65-1-12. C.R.S. 1963: § 65-1-12.
CO Code § 13-45-113 (2021)
2021 Colorado Code|Title 13 - Courts and Court Procedure|Article 45 - Habeas Corpus - General Provisions|§ 13-45-113. Failure to Obey Writ - Penalty

 If any officer, sheriff, jailer, keeper, or other person to whom any such writ is directed neglects or refuses to make the returns or to bring the body of the prisoner according to the command of said writ within the time required by this article, such officer, sheriff, jailer, keeper, or other person is guilty of contempt of the court which issued said writ; whereupon the court shall issue an attachment against such officer, sheriff, jailer, keeper, or other person and cause him to be committed to the jail of the county, there to remain without bail, until he obeys the writ. Such officer, sheriff, jailer, keeper, or other person shall also forfeit to the prisoner or aggrieved party a sum not exceeding five hundred dollars and shall be incapable of holding or executing his said office.   History. Source: R.S. P. 357, § 12. G.L. § 1334. G.S. § 1620. R.S. 08: § 2930. C.L. § 6498. CSA: C. 77, § 13. CRS 53: § 65-1-13. C.R.S. 1963: § 65-1-13. History. Source: R.S. P. 357, § 12. G.L. § 1334. G.S. § 1620. R.S. 08: § 2930. C.L. § 6498. CSA: C. 77, § 13. CRS 53: § 65-1-13. C.R.S. 1963: § 65-1-13.    ANNOTATION   For evidence of custody being insufficient to justify holding in contempt, see Atchel v. Lanphere, 170 Colo. 545 , 463 P.2d 457 (1970).
CO Code § 13-45-114 (2021)
2021 Colorado Code|Title 13 - Courts and Court Procedure|Article 45 - Habeas Corpus - General Provisions|§ 13-45-114. Avoiding Writ - Penalty

 Anyone having a person in his or her custody or under his or her restraint, power, or control for whose relief a writ of habeas corpus is issued who, with the intent to avoid the effect of such writ, transfers such person to the custody, or places him or her under the control, of another or conceals him or her or changes the place of his or her confinement with intent to avoid the operation of such a writ or with intent to remove him or her out of this state commits a class 6 felony and shall be punished as provided in section 18-1.3-401 , C.R.S. In any prosecution for the penalty incurred under this section, it shall not be necessary to show that the writ of habeas corpus had issued at the time of the removal, transfer, or concealment therein mentioned if it is proved that the acts therein forbidden were done with the intent to avoid the operation of such writ.   History. Source: R.S. P. 357, § 13. G.L. § 1335. G.S. § 1621. R.S. 08: § 2931. C.L. § 6499. CSA: C. 77, § 14. CRS 53: § 65-1-14. L. 62: P. 170, § 1. C.R.S. 1963: § 65-1-14. L. 77: Entire section amended, p. 877, § 43, effective July 1, 1979. L. 89: Entire section amended, p. 827, § 32, effective July 1. L. 2002: Entire section amended, p. 1488, § 123, effective October 1. History. Source: R.S. P. 357, § 13. G.L. § 1335. G.S. § 1621. R.S. 08: § 2931. C.L. § 6499. CSA: C. 77, § 14. CRS 53: § 65-1-14. L. 62: P. 170, § 1. C.R.S. 1963: § 65-1-14. L. 77: Entire section amended, p. 877, § 43, effective July 1, 1979. L. 89: Entire section amended, p. 827, § 32, effective July 1. L. 2002: Entire section amended, p. 1488, § 123, effective October 1.    Editor's note:   The effective date for amendments made to this section by chapter 216, L. 77, was changed from July 1, 1978, to April 1, 1979, by chapter 1, First Extraordinary Session, L. 78, and was subsequently changed to July 1, 1979, by chapter 157, § 23, L. 79. See People v. McKenna, 199 Colo. 452 , 611 P.2d 574 (1980).   Cross references:   For the legislative declaration contained in the 2002 act amending this section, see section 1 of chapter 318, Session Laws of Colorado 2002.   ANNOTATION   For penalties imposed on custodian not affecting custodial status of prisoner, see Ex parte Emerson, 107 Colo. 83 , 108 P.2d 866 (1940).
CO Code § 13-45-116 (2021)
2021 Colorado Code|Title 13 - Courts and Court Procedure|Article 45 - Habeas Corpus - General Provisions|§ 13-45-116. Detention After Release - Penalty

 Any person, knowing that another has been discharged by order of a competent tribunal on a habeas corpus, who, contrary to the provisions of this article, arrests or detains him again, for the same cause which was shown on the return of such writ, shall forfeit five hundred dollars for the first offense and one thousand dollars for every subsequent offense.   History. Source: R.S. P. 357, § 15. G.L. § 1337. G.S. § 1623. R.S. 08: § 2933. C.L. § 6501. CSA: C. 77, § 16. CRS 53: § 65-1-16. C.R.S. 1963: § 65-1-16. History. Source: R.S. P. 357, § 15. G.L. § 1337. G.S. § 1623. R.S. 08: § 2933. C.L. § 6501. CSA: C. 77, § 16. CRS 53: § 65-1-16. C.R.S. 1963: § 65-1-16.
CO Code § 13-45-117 (2021)
2021 Colorado Code|Title 13 - Courts and Court Procedure|Article 45 - Habeas Corpus - General Provisions|§ 13-45-117. Forfeitures Go to Use of Prisoner

 All pecuniary forfeitures under this article shall inure to the use of the party for whose benefit the writ of habeas corpus issued and shall be sued for and recovered, with costs, in the name of the state by every person aggrieved.   History. Source: R.S. P. 357, § 16. G.L. § 1338. G.S. § 1624. R.S. 08: § 2934. C.L. § 6502. CSA: C. 77, § 17. CRS 53: § 65-1-17. C.R.S. 1963: § 65-1-17. History. Source: R.S. P. 357, § 16. G.L. § 1338. G.S. § 1624. R.S. 08: § 2934. C.L. § 6502. CSA: C. 77, § 17. CRS 53: § 65-1-17. C.R.S. 1963: § 65-1-17.    Cross references:   For actions in the name of the state for the benefit of another, see C.R.C.P. 17(a).   ANNOTATION   This section and § 13-45-111 have to do with the improper removal of a prisoner from a county jail and providing for the forfeiture to such an aggrieved party of a sum not to exceed $300. Kostal v. People, 160 Colo. 64 , 414 P.2d 123, cert. denied, 385 U.S. 939, 87 S. Ct. 305, 17 L. Ed. 2d 218 (1966).   Plaintiff not entitled to costs against state pursuant to this section because there is no express authorization allowing costs to be assessed against the state. McFarland v. Gunter, 829 P.2d 510 (Colo. App. 1992).
CO Code § 13-45-118 (2021)
2021 Colorado Code|Title 13 - Courts and Court Procedure|Article 45 - Habeas Corpus - General Provisions|§ 13-45-118. Recovery of Forfeiture Not Bar to Civil Suit

 The recovery of the said penalties shall not be a bar to a civil suit for damages.   History. Source: R.S. P. 358, § 18. G.L. § 1340. G.S. § 1626. R.S. 08: § 2936. C.L. § 6504. CSA: C. 77, § 19. CRS 53: § 65-1-18. C.R.S. 1963: § 65-1-18. History. Source: R.S. P. 358, § 18. G.L. § 1340. G.S. § 1626. R.S. 08: § 2936. C.L. § 6504. CSA: C. 77, § 19. CRS 53: § 65-1-18. C.R.S. 1963: § 65-1-18.