WI Stat § 295.77 (2021)
2021 Wisconsin Statutes & Annotations|Chapter 295 - Nonmetallic mining reclamation; oil and gas; ferrous metallic mining.|295.77 - Review.

295.77  Review. (1) Limits on contested case hearings. No person is entitled to a contested case hearing on a decision by the department on an exploration license or an approval that is required before bulk sampling may be implemented. No person is entitled to a contested case hearing on a decision by the department on a mining permit application or any other approval, except as provided in subs. (2) and (3). (2)  Contested case hearings; after initial mining permit decision or decision on amended plan.  (a)  Entitlement. 1. A person is entitled to a contested case hearing on a decision by the department related to a mining permit for a proposed mining operation, including a decision related to the environmental impact statement for the proposed mining operation, or on any decision that is related to an approval associated with the proposed mining operation and that is issued no later than the day on which the department issues its decision on the application for the mining permit, only if the person is entitled to a contested case hearing on the decision under s. 227.42 and the person requests the hearing within 30 days after the department issues the decision to approve or deny the application for the mining permit.2. A person is entitled to a contested case hearing on a decision by the department related to an amended mining plan, reclamation plan, or mining waste site feasibility study and plan of operation required under s. 295.63 (3) or to any amendment to an approval associated with the amended mining plan, reclamation plan, or mining waste site feasibility study and plan of operation only if the person is entitled to a contested case hearing on the decision under s. 227.42 and the person requests the hearing within 30 days after the department issues the decision to approve or deny the amended mining plan, reclamation plan, or mining waste site feasibility study and plan of operation.3. All issues raised by all persons requesting a contested case hearing in accordance with subd. 1. or 2. in connection with the same mining operation shall be considered in one contested case hearing.(b)  Deadline for decision. 1. The hearing examiner presiding over a contested case hearing under this subsection shall issue a final decision on the case no more than 150 days after the department issues the decision to grant or deny the mining permit or to approve or deny the amended mining plan, reclamation plan, or mining waste site feasibility study and plan of operation.2. If the hearing examiner does not issue a final decision by the deadline under subd. 1., the decision of the department being reviewed by the hearing examiner is affirmed.(c)  Restriction on orders. The hearing examiner presiding over a contested case hearing under this subsection may not issue an order prohibiting activity authorized under a decision of the department that is being reviewed in the contested case hearing.(d)  Judicial review. A person seeking judicial review of the decision in a contested case hearing under this subsection shall comply with the requirements for service and filing in s. 227.53 (1) (a) and shall commence the action no more than 30 days after service of the decision or, if the hearing examiner does not issue a final decision by the deadline under par. (b) 1., no more than 30 days after that deadline. (3)  Contested case hearings on other decisions. A person is entitled to a contested case hearing on a decision by the department related to a mining operation that is issued after the department issues the decision to approve the application for the mining permit for the mining operation, other than a decision described in sub. (2) (a) 2., if the person is entitled to a contested case hearing under s. 227.42 and complies with the requirements for service and filing in s. 227.53 (1) (a). (4) Notwithstanding s. 227.53 (1) (a) 3., any person seeking judicial review of the decision on a contested case under sub. (2) or (3) or of any decision of the department under this subchapter shall bring the action in the circuit court for the county in which the majority of the bulk sampling site or mining site is located or in which the majority of the exploration will occur.History:  2013 a. 1.