reglab/housing_qa huggingface dataset:
HI Rev Stat § 601-20 (2021)
2021 Hawaii Revised Statutes|Title 32. Courts and Court Officers|601. Courts Generally|601-20 Court annexed arbitration program.

  §601-20 Court annexed arbitration program. (a) There is established within the judiciary a court annexed arbitration program which shall be a mandatory and nonbinding arbitration program to provide for a procedure to obtain prompt and equitable resolution of certain civil actions in tort through arbitration. The supreme court shall adopt rules for the implementation and administration of the program by January 1, 1987.  (b) All civil actions in tort, having a probable jury award value, not reduced by the issue of liability, exclusive of interest and costs, of $150,000 or less, shall be submitted to the program and be subject to determination of arbitrability and to arbitration under the rules governing the program. The rules shall include a procedure to classify and establish the order of priority according to which the actions will be processed for the determination of arbitrability and for the arbitration under the program. The court may, at its discretion, remove any action from the program.  (c) The chief justice may hire on a contractual basis, and at the chief justice's pleasure remove, without regard to chapter 76, an arbitration administrator, who shall be responsible for the operation and management of the program, and such other persons deemed necessary for the purposes of the program in the judgment of the chief justice. [L Sp 1986, c 2, §21; am L 2000, c 253, §150] Cross References  Bypass of court annexed arbitration, see §671-16.5.  Center for alternative dispute resolution, see chapter 613. Rules of Court  Applicability of Hawaii Arbitration Rules, see RCC rule 34. Law Journals and Reviews  Settling Civil Lawsuits in the Hawaii Circuit Courts. 10 HBJ, no. 13, at 1 (2007).  The Impact of Discovery Limitations on Cost, Satisfaction, and Pace in Court-Annexed Arbitration. 11 UH L. Rev. 81 (1989).  Tort and Insurance "Reform" in a Common Law Court. 14 UH L. Rev. 55 (1992).  Striking a Balance: Procedural Reform Under the Lum Court. 14 UH L. Rev. 223 (1992). Case Notes  Subsection (b) did not violate the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. 76 H. 494, 880 P.2d 169 (1994).
HI Rev Stat § 601-21 (2021)
2021 Hawaii Revised Statutes|Title 32. Courts and Court Officers|601. Courts Generally|601-21 Substance abuse treatment monitoring program.

  §601-21 Substance abuse treatment monitoring program. (a) To determine the effectiveness of substance abuse treatment services and maintain accurate numbers of individuals receiving publicly funded substance abuse treatment, the judiciary shall comply with the requirements of the statewide substance abuse treatment monitoring program established under section 321-192.5. The judiciary shall collect data in accordance with section 321-192.5 from any circuit court, adult probation, and any provider of substance abuse treatment that provides substance abuse treatment to persons served through public funds administered by the judiciary.  (b) The judiciary shall include in the contract with any treatment provider all criteria established by the department of health pursuant to section 321-192.5 to determine whether the treatment provider is achieving success in treating individuals with substance abuse.  (c) The judiciary shall include the information collected under subsection (a) as part of the annual report submitted pursuant to section 601-2.  (d) This section shall not be construed to abrogate an individual's right to privacy. The judiciary shall implement sufficient protections to ensure that the identity of a recipient of substance abuse treatment services remains strictly confidential and that aggregate data collected pursuant to this section is used solely for the purpose of this section. [L 2004, c 40, §26]
HI Rev Stat § 601-51 (2021)
2021 Hawaii Revised Statutes|Title 32. Courts and Court Officers|601. Courts Generally|601-51 REPEALED.

  §601-51 REPEALED. L 1989, c 211, §17.
HI Rev Stat § 602-1 (2021)
2021 Hawaii Revised Statutes|Title 32. Courts and Court Officers|602. Courts of Appeal|602-1 How constituted.

Cross References Uniform electronic legal material act, see chapter 98. Rules of Court See generally Supreme Court Rules; Hawaii Rules of Appellate Procedure; Hawaii Court Records Rules; Hawaii Electronic Filing and Service Rules. Law Journals and Reviews Judicial Review and Sexual Freedom. 30 UH L. Rev. 1 (2007).  You Say You Want a Chevrolution? Factors Predicting the Adoption of the Chevron Standard in Agency Deference at the State Level. 38 UH L. Rev. 447 (2016).  §602-1 How constituted. The supreme court, pursuant to section 2 of article VI of the Constitution, shall consist of a chief justice and four associate justices. [L 1892, c 57, §49; am L 1903, c 32, §13; RL 1925, §2221; RL 1935, §3590; RL 1945, §9601; RL 1955, §214-1; am L Sp 1959 1st, c 5, §2(a); HRS §602-1; ree L 1979, c 111, pt of §2] Cross References  Retirement allowance, see §88-74.  Tenure, removal, retirement, see Const. art. VI, § §3, 5. Case Notes  Provision of will of filling of vacancies among the trustees by choice of majority of the justices, how interpreted. 23 H. 575 (1917), aff'd 250 F. 145 (1980).
HI Rev Stat § 602-2 (2021)
2021 Hawaii Revised Statutes|Title 32. Courts and Court Officers|602. Courts of Appeal|602-2 Salary, supreme court justices.

  §602-2 Salary, supreme court justices. Effective July 1, 2004, the salary of the chief justice of the supreme court and the salary of each associate justice of the supreme court shall be as last recommended by the judicial salary commission. Effective July 1, 2007, and every six years thereafter, the salary of the chief justice of the supreme court and the salary of each associate justice of the supreme court shall be as last recommended by the commission on salaries pursuant to section 26-56, unless disapproved by the legislature. [L Sp 1959 1st, c 4, §1; am L 1962, c 28, §30a; am L 1965, c 223, §12; Supp, §214-1.5; HRS §602-2; am L 1969, c 127, §10; am L 1975, c 58, §26; ree L 1979, c 111, pt of §2; am L 1982, c 129, §25(1); am L 1986, c 128, §22; am L 1990, c 72, §3; am L 1999, c 65, §4; am L 2000, c 2, §2; am L 2003, c 123, §2; am L 2006, c 299, §7] Case Notes  Cited: 57 H. 348, 555 P.2d 1329 (1976).
HI Rev Stat § 602-3 (2021)
2021 Hawaii Revised Statutes|Title 32. Courts and Court Officers|602. Courts of Appeal|602-3 Absence, disability, etc., of chief justice.

  §602-3 Absence, disability, etc., of chief justice. Wherever, by the provisions of any law of the State, any act is required to be performed by the chief justice of the supreme court, the act may (unless otherwise expressly provided) be performed, in case of a vacancy in the office of chief justice, or if the chief justice is ill, absent, or otherwise unable to serve, by an associate justice of the court designated in accordance with the rules of the supreme court. [L 1892, c 72, §4; RL 1925, §2222; RL 1935, §3591; RL 1945, §9602; RL 1955, §214-2; am L Sp 1959 1st, c 5, §2(b); HRS §602-3; am L 1972, c 88, §2(a); ree L 1979, c 111, pt of §2; gen ch 1985] Cross References  See Const. art. VI, §2.
HI Rev Stat § 602-4 (2021)
2021 Hawaii Revised Statutes|Title 32. Courts and Court Officers|602. Courts of Appeal|602-4 Superintendence of inferior courts.

  §602-4 Superintendence of inferior courts. The supreme court shall have the general superintendence of all courts of inferior jurisdiction to prevent and correct errors and abuses therein where no other remedy is expressly provided by law. [L 1892, c 57, §50; RL 1925, §2223; RL 1935, §3592; RL 1945, §9603; RL 1955, §214-3; HRS §602-4; ree L 1979, c 111, pt of §2] Law Journals and Reviews  Through the Looking Glass--Finality, Interlocutory Appeals and the Hawaii Supreme Court's Supervisory Powers. 9 UH L. Rev. 87 (1987).  The Application of the Collateral Order Doctrine to Criminal Appeals in Hawai €˜i. 19 UH L. Rev. 73 (1997). Case Notes  Applied in disposing of appeal on points of law from an illegal sentence. 13 H. 335 (1901).  Appeals in forma pauperis, powers of supreme court in connection with. See 42 H. 1 (1957); 44 H. 31, 352 P.2d 616 (1959); 44 H. 52, 352 P.2d 629 (1959). But see 26 H. 469 (1922).  Circumstances supplied justification for exercise of court's supervisory jurisdiction and court's power to issue prohibition. 59 H. 224, 580 P.2d 49 (1978).  Supervisory power under section invoked to provide needed guidance on matter of grave public concern. 59 H. 224, 580 P.2d 49 (1978).  Supervisory jurisdiction invoked where submission to warrantless searches apparently standard condition of probation. 67 H. 268, 686 P.2d 1379 (1984).  Supervisory jurisdiction invoked to declare judge personally entering the jury room to answer the jurors' questions improper and prejudicial. 69 H. 204, 738 P.2d 812 (1987).  Supreme court invoked supervisory jurisdiction over district court judge. 71 H. 304, 788 P.2d 1281 (1990).  Exercise of supreme court's supervisory powers was not appropriate in case where defendant was not without remedy expressly provided by law; §641-11 and HRAP rule 4(b) provided defendant opportunity to appeal from final judgment and HRPP rule 40 may have provided defendant opportunity to contest validity of no-contest plea by post-conviction petition. 96 H. 462 (App.), 32 P.3d 106 (2001).  Mentioned: 79 H. 26, 897 P.2d 953 (1995).
HI Rev Stat § 602-5.5 (2021)
2021 Hawaii Revised Statutes|Title 32. Courts and Court Officers|602. Courts of Appeal|602-5.5 Judiciary records. (a) Notwithstanding the provisions of any other law to the contrary, the supreme court shall determine whether, and the extent to which, the judiciary, will create, accept, retain, or store in electronic form any case, fiscal, and administrative records and convert written case, fiscal, and administrative records to electronic records. (b) Notwithstanding the provisions of section 94-3, the supreme court shall determine the care, custody, and disposition of all judiciary case, fiscal, and administrative records. A record of dispositional activity shall be maintained stating whether a record was retained by the judiciary; transferred to public archives, the University of Hawaii, the Hawaiian Historical Society; or another agency; or destroyed. This record shall be kept on forms specified by the supreme court. One copy of the record shall be filed in the court where the records originated, and the original shall be filed with the administrative director of the courts or an agency designated by the director. [L 1984, c 258, §1; am L 1997, c 58, §1; am L 2002, c 6, §1] Revision Note "Hawaiian Historical Society" substituted for "Hawaii Historical Society" pursuant to §23G-15. Rules of Court See Hawaii Court Records Rules; Hawaii Electronic Filing and Service Rules.

  §602-5.5  Judiciary records. (a) Notwithstanding the provisions of any other law to the contrary, the supreme court shall determine whether, and the extent to which, the judiciary, will create, accept, retain, or store in electronic form any case, fiscal, and administrative records and convert written case, fiscal, and administrative records to electronic records.  (b) Notwithstanding the provisions of section 94-3, the supreme court shall determine the care, custody, and disposition of all judiciary case, fiscal, and administrative records. A record of dispositional activity shall be maintained stating whether a record was retained by the judiciary; transferred to public archives, the University of Hawaii, the Hawaiian Historical Society; or another agency; or destroyed. This record shall be kept on forms specified by the supreme court. One copy of the record shall be filed in the court where the records originated, and the original shall be filed with the administrative director of the courts or an agency designated by the director. [L 1984, c 258, §1; am L 1997, c 58, §1; am L 2002, c 6, §1] Revision Note  "Hawaiian Historical Society" substituted for "Hawaii Historical Society" pursuant to §23G-15. Rules of Court  See Hawaii Court Records Rules; Hawaii Electronic Filing and Service Rules.
HI Rev Stat § 602-6 (2021)
2021 Hawaii Revised Statutes|Title 32. Courts and Court Officers|602. Courts of Appeal|602-6 OLD REPEALED. §602-6 REPEALED.

  §602-6 OLD REPEALED. L 1972, c 88, §2(h).   §602-6 REPEALED. L 2004, c 202, §80.
HI Rev Stat § 602-7 (2021)
2021 Hawaii Revised Statutes|Title 32. Courts and Court Officers|602. Courts of Appeal|602-7 Oaths, subpoenas.

  §602-7 Oaths, subpoenas. The supreme court may compel the attendance of witnesses and the production of books, papers, documents or tangible things, and any justice may administer oaths. [L 1892, c 57, §52; RL 1925, §2226; RL 1935, §3595; RL 1945, §9606; RL 1955, §214-6; HRS §602-7; am L 1972, c 88, §2(c); ree L 1979, c 111, pt of §2] Case Notes  Mentioned: 76 H. 273, 874 P.2d 1098 (1994).
HI Rev Stat § 602-8 (2021)
2021 Hawaii Revised Statutes|Title 32. Courts and Court Officers|602. Courts of Appeal|602-8 Terms.

  §602-8 Terms. The supreme court shall be deemed to be in continuous session. The court shall be deemed always open for filing papers, issuing and returning process, and issuing orders. [L 1892, c 57, §54; am L 1901, c 22, §1; RL 1925, §2227; RL 1935, §3596; RL 1945, §9607; RL 1955, §214-7; HRS §602-8; am L 1972, c 88, §2(d); ree L 1979, c 111, pt of §2; am L 1984, c 106, §1]
HI Rev Stat § 602-9 (2021)
2021 Hawaii Revised Statutes|Title 32. Courts and Court Officers|602. Courts of Appeal|602-9 Sessions, where.

  §602-9 Sessions, where. The supreme court shall sit in Honolulu; provided that the chief justice may appoint a different place for the sitting of the court, pro tempore. [L 1892, c 57, §55; am L 1901, c 22, §2; RL 1925, §2228; RL 1935, §3597; RL 1945, §9608; RL 1955, §214-8; HRS §602-9; am L 1972, c 88, §2(e); ree L 1979, c 111, pt of §2]
HI Rev Stat § 602-10 (2021)
2021 Hawaii Revised Statutes|Title 32. Courts and Court Officers|602. Courts of Appeal|602-10 OLD REPEALED. §602-10 Full court; oral argument; substitute justices.

  §602-10 OLD REPEALED. L 1972, c 88, §2(h).   §602-10 Full court; oral argument; substitute justices. Parties to a proceeding before the supreme court shall be entitled to consideration by a full court. Oral argument shall be before a full court; provided that in an appropriate case, the court in its discretion may dispense with oral argument. In case of a vacancy, or if a justice of the supreme court is disqualified from sitting in any case pending before the supreme court, is unable to attend, is absent, is recused, or has been excused, the vacancy or the place of such justice may be temporarily filled by a circuit judge designated by the chief justice or by the appointment of a justice who has retired from the supreme court. Such retired justice chosen to serve as substitute justice shall not be actively engaged in the practice of law. A retired justice, when sitting as substitute justice, shall be compensated at a rate of pay of associate justices of the supreme court. When necessary, the court may consist of five circuit judges so designated, or five retired justices so appointed, or any combination of circuit judges and retired justices. After oral argument of a case, if a vacancy arises or if for any other reason a justice is unable to continue on the case, the case may be decided or disposed of upon the concurrence of any three members of the court without filling the vacancy or the place of such justice. [L 1892, c 57, §56; am L 1896, c 12, §1; am L 1903, c 32, §15; am L 1905, c 92, §1; am L 1909, c 14, §1; RL 1925, §2230; RL 1935, §3599; RL 1945, §9610; RL 1955, §214-10; am L 1963, c 193, §61; HRS §602-11; am L 1972, c 88, §2(f); am L 1974, c 146, §1; am L 1978, c 114, §1; ren L 1979, c 111, pt of §2; am L 2004, c 202, §56; am L 2006, c 94, §1; am L 2010, c 109, §1] Case Notes  "Cause" in phrase "connection with the said cause" means issue brought to supreme court, not entire case in lower court. 9 H. 354 (1894); 20 H. 553 (1911).  Resignation of justice, though absolute in form, does not under all circumstances at once vacate office. 12 H. 332 (1900).  Duty of justice to sit unless disqualified or unable to sit for reason specified. 17 H. 393 (1906). See 41 H. 270 (1956).  Petition for rehearing must be acted upon by court as constituted when case was decided, if all members thereof are available. 45 H. 440, 369 P.2d 114 (1962).  Change in court no bar to grant of rehearing. 50 H. 40, 429 P.2d 829 (1967).  When no disinterested substitutes can be designated, doctrine of necessity allows interested judges to participate in the case. 57 H. 348, 555 P.2d 1329 (1976).
HI Rev Stat § 602-11 (2021)
2021 Hawaii Revised Statutes|Title 32. Courts and Court Officers|602. Courts of Appeal|602-11 Rules.

  §602-11 Rules. The supreme court shall have power to promulgate rules in all civil and criminal cases for all courts relating to process, practices, procedure and appeals, which shall have the force and effect of law. Such rules shall not abridge, enlarge, or modify the substantive rights of any litigant, nor the jurisdiction of any of the courts, nor affect any statute of limitations.  Whenever in a statute it is provided that the statute is applicable "except as otherwise provided," or words to that effect, these words shall be deemed to refer to provisions of the rules of court as well as other statutory provisions. [L 1939, c 215, §1; RL 1945, §9614; RL 1955, §214-14; HRS §602-21; am L 1972, c 88, §2(g); ren L 1979, c 111, pt of §2] Cross References  Constitutional provision, see Const. art. VI, §7. Rules of Court  See Rules of the Supreme Court; Hawaii Rules of Professional Conduct; Hawaii Revised Code of Judicial Conduct; Hawaii Rules of Appellate Procedure; Rules of the Intermediate Court of Appeals; Hawaii Rules of Civil Procedure; Hawaii Rules of Penal Procedure; Rules of the Circuit Courts; Hawaii Arbitration Rules; Rules of the District Courts; District Court Rules of Civil Procedure; Rules of the Small Claims Division; Rules of the Family Court; Rules of the Tax Appeal Court; Rules of the Land Court; Hawaii Civil Traffic Rules; Hawaii Probate Rules; Rules Governing Court Reporting; Hawaii Court Records Rules; Hawaii Electronic Filing and Service Rules. Law Journals and Reviews  A Piece of Mind for Peace of Mind: Federal Discoverability of Opinion Work Product Provided to Expert Witnesses and Its Implications in Hawai €˜i. 24 UH L. Rev. 859 (2002).  Electronic Discovery: A Call for a New Rules Regime for the Hawai €˜i Courts. 32 UH L. Rev. 153 (2009). Case Notes  Reasonable compliance with a rule must be required. 20 H. 39 (1910); 24 H. 711, 713 (1919); 29 H. 802, 803 (1927).  The responsibility of the court to require such compliance is secondary to the duty of the court to maintain the integrity of stipulations approved by and filed with the court. 24 H. 655, 657 (1919).  Family court rules have force and effect of law. 61 H. 167, 598 P.2d 176 (1979).  Cited: 48 H. 290, 300, 401 P.2d 449 (1965).
HI Rev Stat § 602-21 (2021)
2021 Hawaii Revised Statutes|Title 32. Courts and Court Officers|602. Courts of Appeal|602-21 Renumbered as §602-11.

  §602-21 Renumbered as §602-11.
HI Rev Stat § 602-51 (2021)
2021 Hawaii Revised Statutes|Title 32. Courts and Court Officers|602. Courts of Appeal|602-51 How constituted.

Note As enacted, the sections in this part were designated § §602-12 to 602-20. Rules of Court  See generally Rules of the Intermediate Court of Appeals; Hawaii Rules of Appellate Procedure; Hawaii Court Records Rules; Hawaii Electronic Filing and Service Rules. Law Journals and Reviews  Administering Justice or Just Administration: The Hawai €˜i Supreme Court and the Intermediate Court of Appeals. 14 UH L. Rev. 271 (1992).  Judicial Review and Sexual Freedom. 30 UH L. Rev. 1 (2007).   §602-51 How constituted. The intermediate appellate court shall consist of a chief judge and five associate judges. The chief judge, who shall be specifically selected, shall supervise the administrative duties of the court. [L 1979, c 111, pt of §3; am L 1992, c 253, §2; am L 2001, c 248, §1]
HI Rev Stat § 602-52 (2021)
2021 Hawaii Revised Statutes|Title 32. Courts and Court Officers|602. Courts of Appeal|602-52 Salary.

  §602-52 Salary.  Effective July 1, 2004, the salary of the chief judge of the intermediate appellate court and the salary of each associate judge shall be as last recommended by the judicial salary commission. Effective July 1, 2007, and every six years thereafter, the salary of the chief judge of the intermediate appellate court and the salary of each associate judge shall be as last recommended by the commission on salaries pursuant to section 26-56, unless disapproved by the legislature. [L 1979, c 111, pt of §3; am L 1982, c 129, §25(2); am L 1986, c 128, §23; am L 1990, c 72, §4; am L 1999, c 65, §5; am L 2000, c 2, §3; am L 2003, c 123, §3; am L 2006, c 299, §8]
HI Rev Stat § 602-53 (2021)
2021 Hawaii Revised Statutes|Title 32. Courts and Court Officers|602. Courts of Appeal|602-53 Terms.

  §602-53 Terms. The intermediate appellate court shall be deemed always to be in continuous session. The court shall be deemed always open for filing papers, issuing and returning process, and issuing orders. [L 1979, c 111, pt of §3; am L 1984, c 106, §2]
HI Rev Stat § 602-54 (2021)
2021 Hawaii Revised Statutes|Title 32. Courts and Court Officers|602. Courts of Appeal|602-54 Session, where.

  §602-54 Session, where. The intermediate appellate court shall sit in Honolulu; provided that the chief judge may appoint a different place for the sitting of the court, pro tempore. [L 1979, c 111, pt of §3]
HI Rev Stat § 602-55 (2021)
2021 Hawaii Revised Statutes|Title 32. Courts and Court Officers|602. Courts of Appeal|602-55 Panels; substitute judge.

  §602-55 Panels; substitute judge. Parties shall be entitled to a hearing before a panel of not less than three intermediate appellate judges. In case of vacancy, or if the number of available intermediate appellate judges is insufficient to make up a panel because of disqualification, the chief justice of the supreme court may designate circuit judges, retired intermediate appellate judges, or retired supreme court justices to temporarily fill the vacancy or the need to make up a panel. A judge serving temporarily shall not be actively engaged in the practice of law. Substitute judges shall be compensated per diem at a rate of pay equivalent to that of associate intermediate appellate judges. [L 1979, c 111, pt of §3; am L 1983, c 244, §1; am L 2006, c 4, §1; am L 2021, c 10, §1]
HI Rev Stat § 602-56 (2021)
2021 Hawaii Revised Statutes|Title 32. Courts and Court Officers|602. Courts of Appeal|602-56 Absence, disability, of the chief judge.

  §602-56 Absence, disability, of the chief judge. Whenever, by the provisions of any law of the State, any act is required to be prepared by the chief judge of the intermediate appellate court, the act may be performed, in case of a vacancy, or illness, absence or disability, by an associate judge designated in accordance with the rules of the supreme court. [L 1979, c 111, pt of §3]