reglab/housing_qa huggingface dataset:
SD Codified L § 16-19-97 (2021)
2021 South Dakota Codified Laws|Title 16 - Courts and Judiciary|Chapter 19 - Discipline Of Attorneys|Section 16-19-97 - Examination of petitioner for reinstatement--Expense of examination--Additional proof of competence to practice law.

16-19-97. Examination of petitioner for reinstatement--Expense of examination--Additional proof of competence to practice law.Upon application for reinstatement by an attorney on medical inactive status, the Supreme Court may take or direct such action as it deems necessary to determine whether the attorney's medical condition no longer affects the attorney's ability to competently practice law, including an examination of the attorney by such qualified medical experts as the Court shall designate. In its discretion, the Court may direct that the expense of such an examination be paid by the attorney. The Supreme Court may require that the attorney establish further proof of competence and learning in law, which proof may include providing certification by the board of bar examiners that the attorney successfully completed all or any portion of the South Dakota bar examination after transfer to medical inactive status. Source: Sup. Ct. Disc. Rules Aug. 28, 1974, §6 (d); SDCL Supp, 16-19 Appx.; Supreme Court Rule 78-1, Rule XV (d); SL 2018, ch 298 (Supreme Court Rule 18-07), eff. July 1, 2018.
SD Codified L § 16-19-98 (2021)
2021 South Dakota Codified Laws|Title 16 - Courts and Judiciary|Chapter 19 - Discipline Of Attorneys|Section 16-19-98 - Order of reinstatement to active status from medical inactive status.

16-19-98. Order of reinstatement to active status from medical inactive status.A petition for reinstatement of an attorney on medical inactive status shall be granted by the Supreme Court upon a showing by clear and convincing evidence that the attorney is competent to resume the practice of law. An attorney who has been placed on medical inactive status may not be reinstated until any pending disciplinary investigation or proceeding has been concluded. Source: Sup. Ct. Disc. Rules Aug. 28, 1974, §6 (d); SDCL Supp, 16-19 Appx.; Supreme Court Rule 78-1, Rule XV (d); Supreme Court Rule 97-37; SL 2018, ch 298 (Supreme Court Rule 18-07), eff. July 1, 2018.
SD Codified L § 16-19-99 (2021)
2021 South Dakota Codified Laws|Title 16 - Courts and Judiciary|Chapter 19 - Discipline Of Attorneys|Section 16-19-99 - Attorney discipline--Proceedings confidential--Violation as contempt--Exceptions.

16-19-99. Attorney discipline--Proceedings confidential--Violation as contempt--Exceptions.All proceedings involving allegations of misconduct by an attorney or the attorney's competency to practice law because of a medical condition as defined by §16-19-48 shall be kept confidential until:(a)A formal complaint asking for disciplinary action is filed with the Supreme Court by the board or the attorney general, or(b)Upon the request of the attorney to have the matter be public, or(c)If the investigation into the attorney's alleged misconduct is predicated upon a conviction for a crime reportable under §16-19-37.If the disciplinary proceeding involves alleged misconduct due to an attorney's medical condition as defined by subdivision 16-19-29(1) and the Supreme Court enters an order transferring the attorney to medical inactive status pursuant to §16-19-88 or 16-19-92, only the order shall be public. The record shall remain confidential absent a written waiver by the attorney or an order of the Supreme Court. All participants in the proceeding shall conduct themselves so as to maintain the confidentiality of the proceeding. Any violation by any person of the requirement of confidentiality shall constitute contempt and shall be punishable as such by the Supreme Court. An attorney on medical inactive status shall be permitted to relate necessary information from the proceedings to the attorney's treating healthcare or medical practitioners for the purpose of restoring the attorney to active status. This section shall not be construed to deny access to relevant information to authorized agencies investigating the qualifications of judicial candidates, the board of bar examiners, or to other jurisdictions investigating qualifications for admission to practice; or to an agency acting pursuant to order of the Chief Judge of the United States District Court for South Dakota concerning reciprocal discipline; or to law enforcement agencies investigating qualifications for government employment. In addition, the clerk of the Supreme Court shall transmit notice of all public discipline imposed by the Supreme Court on an attorney or the transfer to medical inactive status of an attorney to the national discipline data bank maintained by the American Bar Association. Source: Supreme Court Rule 78-1, Rule XVI; Supreme Court Rule 95-12; SL 2009, ch 283 (Supreme Court Rule 09-04), eff. July 1, 2009; SL 2018, ch 298 (Supreme Court Rule 18-07), eff. July 1, 2018.
SD Codified L § 16-19-100 (2021)
2021 South Dakota Codified Laws|Title 16 - Courts and Judiciary|Chapter 19 - Discipline Of Attorneys|Section 16-19-100 - Retention of files and records of disbarred, suspended, or reinstated attorney.

16-19-100. Retention of files and records of disbarred, suspended, or reinstated attorney.The board shall, unless otherwise ordered by the Supreme Court, retain its files and records of any attorney who has been disbarred, suspended, placed on probationary status, placed on medical inactive status pursuant to §16-19-89 or 16-19-92, publicly censured, or who has been later reinstated after a prior discipline until such time as the attorney dies, at which time the records may be expunged. Source: SL 1991, ch 432 (Supreme Court Rule 90-9); SL 2016, ch 246 (Supreme Court Rule 16-66), eff. July 1, 2016; SL 2018, ch 298 (Supreme Court Rule 18-07), eff. July 1, 2018.
SD Codified L § 16-20-1 (2021)
2021 South Dakota Codified Laws|Title 16 - Courts and Judiciary|Chapter 20 - Expanded Media Coverage Of Trial Court Proceedings|Section 16-20-1 - Definitions.

16-20-1. Definitions.As used in these rules, the following terms mean:(a)"Judicial proceeding" or "proceeding" includes all public arguments, hearings, trials, or other proceedings before a trial court, except those specifically excluded by these rules. These rules do not apply to coverage of ceremonial or nonjudicial proceedings.(b)"Expanded media coverage" includes audio or video recording or broadcasting, televising, electronic recording, or photographing of judicial proceedings for the purpose of gathering and disseminating news and educational or instructional information to the public. Any other use, absent express written permission of the court is prohibited.(c)"Audio media coverage" includes audio recording or broadcasting or electronic recording of judicial proceedings for the purpose of gathering and disseminating news and educational or instructional information to the public. Any other use, absent express written permission of the court is prohibited.(d)"Trial court" or the "court" means a South Dakota circuit or magistrate court in which a judicial proceeding is taking place.(e)"Media coordinator" means the circuit court administrator for the circuit in which judicial proceedings are taking place.(f)"News media" means personnel of a newspaper or other periodical, news service, radio station, television station, or television network, who deliver news to the general public on a regular and consistent basis in print, electronic or digital format. Source: SL 2011, ch 233 (Supreme Court Rule 10-09), eff. July 1, 2011; SL 2014, ch 261 (Supreme Court Rule 14-02), eff. Feb. 20, 2014.
SD Codified L § 16-20-2 (2021)
2021 South Dakota Codified Laws|Title 16 - Courts and Judiciary|Chapter 20 - Expanded Media Coverage Of Trial Court Proceedings|Section 16-20-2 - General.

16-20-2. General.(a) Expanded media coverage or audio media coverage must be conducted in conformity with applicable statutes, rules, and caselaw.(b) Nothing herein shall alter the obligation of any attorney to comply with the provisions of the Rules of Professional Conduct governing trial publicity.(c) Except as otherwise provided by these rules, electronic recording by moving camera, still camera, and audio device, and broadcasting is prohibited as to all judicial proceedings in a courtroom during sessions of a trial court. This prohibition does not apply to the use of cameras in a courtroom for courtroom security purposes, the videotaped or audio recording of proceedings to create the official record of a case, or to interactive video hearings.(d) If the court and all parties consent in writing or on the record at least one week prior to the commencement of a judicial proceeding, the court may authorize expanded media coverage of the proceeding under the conditions and standards set forth in these rules.(e) If the court consents in writing or on the record at least one week prior to the commencement of a judicial proceeding, it may authorize audio media coverage of the proceeding, or a portion thereof, under the conditions and standards set forth in these rules that are applicable to audio coverage. Source: SL 2011, ch 233 (Supreme Court Rule 10-09), eff. July 1, 2011.
SD Codified L § 16-20-4 (2021)
2021 South Dakota Codified Laws|Title 16 - Courts and Judiciary|Chapter 20 - Expanded Media Coverage Of Trial Court Proceedings|Section 16-20-4 - Media coordinator.

16-20-4. Media coordinator.The court and all interested members of the media shall work, whenever possible, with and through the media coordinator regarding all arrangements for expanded media coverage or audio media coverage. Source: SL 2011, ch 233 (Supreme Court Rule 10-09), eff. July 1, 2011.
SD Codified L § 16-20-5 (2021)
2021 South Dakota Codified Laws|Title 16 - Courts and Judiciary|Chapter 20 - Expanded Media Coverage Of Trial Court Proceedings|Section 16-20-5 - Standards.

16-20-5. Standards.Media representatives providing expanded media coverage or audio media coverage of a judicial proceeding shall comply with the standards for conduct and attire, technical standards and standards for equipment and pooling set forth in §§15-24-9, 15-24-11 and 15-24-12 with the following modifications:(a)Where those rules require approval of a matter by "the court" or the "Chief Justice," approval shall be obtained from the circuit or magistrate judge presiding over the judicial proceeding.(b)Video cameras, still cameras, and other equipment to be used by the media in the courtroom during judicial proceedings must not produce distracting light or noise. No artificial lighting device of any kind shall be employed with a video camera or still camera.(c)Notwithstanding §15-24-12(a), the number of video cameras in the courtroom shall be limited to one operated by not more than one cameraperson.(d)Notwithstanding §15-24-12(b), the number of still camera photographers in the courtroom shall be limited to one who is allowed two camera bodies.(e)In addition to the pooling provisions in §15-24-12(e), if there is no advance media agreement as to pooling arrangements, the court shall prohibit the media from the audio or video recording or broadcast of the judicial proceeding. Source: SL 2011, ch 233 (Supreme Court Rule 10-09), eff. July 1, 2011.
SD Codified L § 16-20-6 (2021)
2021 South Dakota Codified Laws|Title 16 - Courts and Judiciary|Chapter 20 - Expanded Media Coverage Of Trial Court Proceedings|Section 16-20-6 - Hearing.

16-20-6. Hearing.Before limiting, suspending, or terminating expanded media coverage as previously consented to by all the parties or audio media coverage as previously consented to by the judge, the judge presiding in the case may hold an on-the-record hearing, if such hearing will not delay or disrupt the judicial proceeding. In the event that a hearing is not possible, affidavits may be used. Following a hearing or ruling based on affidavits, a written order must be issued. Source: SL 2011, ch 233 (Supreme Court Rule 10-09), eff. July 1, 2011.
SD Codified L § 16-20-7 (2021)
2021 South Dakota Codified Laws|Title 16 - Courts and Judiciary|Chapter 20 - Expanded Media Coverage Of Trial Court Proceedings|Section 16-20-7 - Appellate review.

16-20-7. Appellate review.Appellate review of a judge's order to deny, terminate, suspend, limit, or exclude expanded media coverage or audio media coverage must be in accordance with the South Dakota Rules of Appellate Procedure.There will be no stay of a judicial proceeding pending an appeal or other request for relief from a judge's order denying, limiting, suspending, or terminating media coverage. If a judicial proceeding has ended before completion of an appeal or other request for relief, the Supreme Court may nonetheless issue a ruling for future guidance on similar issues. Source: SL 2011, ch 233 (Supreme Court Rule 10-09), eff. July 1, 2011.
SD Codified L § 16-21-1 (2021)
2021 South Dakota Codified Laws|Title 16 - Courts and Judiciary|Chapter 21 - Electronic Document Management System--Official Court Record|Section 16-21-1 - Definitions.

16-21-1. Definitions.(a) "Electronic Document Management System" ("EDMS") means a collection of computer software application programs and hardware devices that provide a means of organizing and controlling the creation, management and retrieval of documents through their life cycle.(b) "Electronic record" means a record created, generated, sent, communicated, received, or stored by electronic means within the Unified Judicial System's EDMS.(c) "Electronic signature" means an electronic symbol or process attached to or logically associated with a document, that can be executed or adopted by the user with the intent to sign a document. Source: SL 2012, ch 255, §1 (Supreme Court Rule 12-01), eff. Feb. 21, 2012.
SD Codified L § 16-21-2 (2021)
2021 South Dakota Codified Laws|Title 16 - Courts and Judiciary|Chapter 21 - Electronic Document Management System--Official Court Record|Section 16-21-2 - Electronic document management system policy.

16-21-2. Electronic Document Management System Policy.The State Court Administrator, in consultation with the Unified Judicial System Technology Council, shall prepare and publish an Electronic Document Management System Policy specifying EDMS policy and procedure within the clerk of courts office. Such policy may be amended as necessary and appropriate to carry out the provisions of these rules establishing an EDMS. Source: SL 2012, ch 255, §2 (Supreme Court Rule 12-01), eff. Feb. 21, 2012.
SD Codified L § 16-21-3 (2021)
2021 South Dakota Codified Laws|Title 16 - Courts and Judiciary|Chapter 21 - Electronic Document Management System--Official Court Record|Section 16-21-3 - EDMS conversion.

16-21-3. EDMS conversion.For those counties with EDMS capabilities, the clerk of courts office shall not maintain a paper court file in any case commenced after the effective date of this rule except as otherwise provided in the EDMS policy. The clerk of courts shall electronically scan all paper documents and convert them to electronic documents pursuant to the EDMS policy. Source: SL 2012, ch 255, §3 (Supreme Court Rule 12-01), eff. Feb. 21, 2012.
SD Codified L § 16-21-4 (2021)
2021 South Dakota Codified Laws|Title 16 - Courts and Judiciary|Chapter 21 - Electronic Document Management System--Official Court Record|Section 16-21-4 - Official record.

16-21-4. Official record.(1)Whenever available, the official court record shall be the electronic file maintained by the Unified Judicial System. The official record shall also include, however, any conventional documents or exhibits filed and maintained in accordance with the policy for EDMS. The clerk of court shall maintain the official court record in an electronic format or in a combination of electronic and nonelectronic formats as required. Documents filed by traditional methods shall be electronically scanned and made part of the official record in accordance with the EDMS policy. If a document submitted by traditional methods is not of sufficient graphical quality to be legible when electronically scanned into the EDMS, the clerk shall maintain the document in paper format.(2)An electronic transmission or print-out from the EDMS that shows the clerk's seal attesting to the document's authenticity shall be considered an official record or certified copy of the original.(3)Any court rule requiring that a document be an original, be on paper or another tangible medium, or be in writing, is satisfied by the electronic image defined as the original document in this rule. No record or signature may be denied legal effect or enforceability solely because it is in electronic form.(4)A requirement that a document or signature associated with a document be notarized, acknowledged, verified, witnessed, or made under oath is satisfied if the electronic signature of the person authorized to perform that act, and all other information required to be included, is attached or logically associated with the document or signature.(5)Court personnel will electronically file all official documents entered by the court. This applies to any electronic documents generated by the court and shall include orders, judgments, memoranda, papers, notices and any other official document. Source: SL 2012, ch 255, §4 (Supreme Court Rule 12-01), eff. Feb. 21, 2012.
SD Codified L § 16-21-5 (2021)
2021 South Dakota Codified Laws|Title 16 - Courts and Judiciary|Chapter 21 - Electronic Document Management System--Official Court Record|Section 16-21-5 - Signatures of judges and court officials.

16-21-5. Signatures of judges and court officials.The requirement that any court record or document be signed is met by use of an electronic signature. The submission of a document signed with an "/s/ name" or electronic image of the traditional signature when filed with the login and password of a judge or court official shall constitute an original signature for all purposes. An electronic signature is considered to be the original signature upon the court record or document for all purposes under this rule and other applicable statutes or rules. Source: SL 2012, ch 255, §5 (Supreme Court Rule 12-01), eff. Feb. 21, 2012.
SD Codified L § 16-21-6 (2021)
2021 South Dakota Codified Laws|Title 16 - Courts and Judiciary|Chapter 21 - Electronic Document Management System--Official Court Record|Section 16-21-6 - Confidential information.

16-21-6. Confidential information.The confidentiality of an electronic record, or an electronic copy thereof, is the same for the equivalent paper record. Access to confidential information, regardless of form, shall only be to the extent provided by law. The EDMS shall place a visible mark identifying confidential or sealed information and restrict access accordingly. Source: SL 2012, ch 255, §6 (Supreme Court Rule 12-01), eff. Feb. 21, 2012.
SD Codified L § 16-21-7 (2021)
2021 South Dakota Codified Laws|Title 16 - Courts and Judiciary|Chapter 21 - Electronic Document Management System--Official Court Record|Section 16-21-7 - Certification and authentication of court record.

16-21-7. Certification and authentication of court record.A court document may be certified as an official copy only if the original document is on file with the court. In addition to manually certifying documents with a handwritten signature, any custodian of a court document may also use an electronic signature and seal to certify or authenticate documents that are in electronic format. A raised seal on the copy from the issuing court shall not be required. Source: SL 2012, ch 255, §7 (Supreme Court Rule 12-01), eff. Feb. 21, 2012.
SD Codified L § 16-21-8 (2021)
2021 South Dakota Codified Laws|Title 16 - Courts and Judiciary|Chapter 21 - Electronic Document Management System--Official Court Record|Section 16-21-8 - Public access.

16-21-8. Public access.Public access to the electronic documents filed in the EDMS shall be available at no charge at the clerk's office during regular business hours through a public access terminal or any other reasonable means to provide access to publicly available portions of an electronic record. Fees for copies of electronic documents shall be as provided by law. Source: SL 2012, ch 255, §8 (Supreme Court Rule 12-01), eff. Feb. 21, 2012.
SD Codified L § 16-21-9 (2021)
2021 South Dakota Codified Laws|Title 16 - Courts and Judiciary|Chapter 21 - Electronic Document Management System--Official Court Record|Section 16-21-9 - Electronic transmission.

16-21-9. Electronic transmission.To the extent reasonably practicable, a clerk shall distribute through electronic means all communications, including orders, judgments, notices and any other communications to attorneys and self-represented litigants in any pending proceeding. Source: SL 2012, ch 255, §9 (Supreme Court Rule 12-01), eff. Feb. 21, 2012.
SD Codified L § 16-21A-1 (2021)
2021 South Dakota Codified Laws|Title 16 - Courts and Judiciary|Chapter 21A - Circuit Court Electronic Filing Rules|Section 16-21A-1 - Definitions.

16-21A-1. Definitions.(1) "Registered user" means an attorney or party registered with the South Dakota Odyssey7 electronic filing system.(2) "Electronic filing system" means the Odyssey7 file and serve system maintained by the South Dakota Unified Judicial System.(3) "Confidential" means any records not accessible to the public as provided by §15-15A-7. A document marked as "confidential" means that the document will not be accessible to the public but will be accessible to court personnel and attorneys or parties in the case as permitted by applicable law or court order.(4) "Sealed" means any record where access is restricted by order of the court. A document marked "sealed" will not be accessible to the public but will be accessible to court personnel and attorneys or parties in the case as permitted by applicable law or court order.(5) "Electronic Signature" means an electronic symbol or process attached to or logically associated with a document executed or adopted by a user with the intent to sign a document. Source: SL 2014, ch 254 (Supreme Court Rule 13-12), eff. July 1, 2014.
SD Codified L § 16-21A-3 (2021)
2021 South Dakota Codified Laws|Title 16 - Courts and Judiciary|Chapter 21A - Circuit Court Electronic Filing Rules|Section 16-21A-3 - Filing formats.

16-21A-3.Filing formats.Approved formats for documents filed electronically are WordPerfect (.wpd), Word (.doc or .docx), Tagged Image File (.tif) and text searchable Portable Document File (. pdf). Source: SL 2014, ch 254 (Supreme Court Rule 13-12), eff. July 1, 2014.
SD Codified L § 16-21A-4 (2021)
2021 South Dakota Codified Laws|Title 16 - Courts and Judiciary|Chapter 21A - Circuit Court Electronic Filing Rules|Section 16-21A-4 - Time of filing.

16-21A-4.Time of filing.(1) A document in compliance with the rules and submitted electronically to the court clerk of court by 11:59 p. m. central standard time or daylight savings time as applicable shall be considered filed on that date.(2) After reviewing an electronically filed document, the clerk of court must inform the filer, through an e-mail generated by the Odyssey7 system, whether the document has been accepted or rejected. A document may be rejected (a) if it is filed in the wrong county; (b) applicable filing fees are not paid or waived; (c) the document is incomplete or contains missing information; (d) or fails to comply with applicable statutory requirements or these rules.(3) Any applicable fees associated with the filing must be paid at the time the document is filed. A request for the waiver of fees must accompany the filing of the document. If the request to waive such fees is denied the party must submit any applicable fee within seven days. Source: SL 2014, ch 254 (Supreme Court Rule 13-12), eff. July 1, 2014.