reglab/housing_qa huggingface dataset:
CO Code § 16-11.9-201 (2021)
2021 Colorado Code|Title 16 - Criminal Proceedings|Article 11.9 - Persons With Behavioral or Mental Health Disorders in the Criminal Justice System|Part 2 - Statewide Behavioral Health Court Liaison Program|§ 16-11.9-201. Legislative Declaration and Intent

  The general assembly finds and declares that:   Colorado's citizens who are living with mental health and substance use disorders are overrepresented in the criminal justice system, and they are at a significantly greater risk of incurring criminal justice involvement, longer terms of involvement, and harsher consequences of that involvement when compared to the general public;    Colorado must make a commitment to ensure that all individuals within the criminal justice system are treated fairly and humanely, regardless of their behavioral health history or mental state; and    There is a significant need for enhanced communication among health-care systems, behavioral health systems, and criminal justice entities, including law enforcement, defense attorneys, district attorneys, judges, and probation, to foster collaboration that provides all individuals with a fair chance of living a healthy and productive life.       The general assembly further finds that:   Colorado has an obligation to ensure that entities within the criminal justice system are equipped with a greater understanding of behavioral health treatment options in the community; and    Community mental health providers, including community mental health centers, are a critical component of achieving positive outcomes for individuals living with mental health, behavioral health, and substance use disorders and have long held an essential role in engaging criminal justice entities.       The general assembly therefore finds that it is critical to create a network of professionals who can comprehensively bridge the criminal justice system and the community behavioral health systems across the state in order to:   Promote positive outcomes for individuals living with mental health or co-occurring behavioral health conditions;    Inform criminal justice entities about community treatment options; and    Connect individuals to behavioral health services.       Therefore, the general assembly declares that a statewide behavioral health court liaison program must provide a method for collaboration and consultation among behavioral health providers, district attorneys, and defense attorneys about available community-based behavioral health services and supports, competency evaluations, restoration to competency services, and other relevant decisions and issues facing individuals with mental health or co-occurring behavioral health conditions who are involved with the criminal justice system, including appropriateness for community treatment and resource availability.     History. Source: L. 2018: Entire part added,(SB 18-251), ch. 404, p. 2380, § 1, effective June 6.
CO Code § 16-11.9-202 (2021)
2021 Colorado Code|Title 16 - Criminal Proceedings|Article 11.9 - Persons With Behavioral or Mental Health Disorders in the Criminal Justice System|Part 2 - Statewide Behavioral Health Court Liaison Program|§ 16-11.9-202. Definitions

 As used in this part 2, unless the context otherwise requires:    “Behavioral health condition” refers to mental health and co-occurring substance use conditions that are indicative of a possible behavioral health problem, concern, or disorder.    “Behavioral health services” or “behavioral health systems” means service systems that encompass prevention and promotion of emotional health, prevention and treatment services for mental health and substance use conditions, and recovery support.    “Court liaison” means a person who is hired as a dedicated behavioral health court liaison for the program pursuant to section 16-11.9-203.    “Program” means the statewide behavioral health court liaison program established in section 16-11.9-203.    “State court administrator” means the state court administrator established pursuant to section 13-3-101.     History. Source: L. 2018: Entire part added,(SB 18-251), ch. 404, p. 2381, § 1, effective June 6.
CO Code § 16-11.9-203 (2021)
2021 Colorado Code|Title 16 - Criminal Proceedings|Article 11.9 - Persons With Behavioral or Mental Health Disorders in the Criminal Justice System|Part 2 - Statewide Behavioral Health Court Liaison Program|§ 16-11.9-203. Statewide Behavioral Health Court Liaison Program - Established - Purpose - Administration

     The statewide behavioral health court liaison program is established in the office of the state court administrator. The state court administrator is responsible for program administration, including ensuring that each judicial district implements a local program design that is aligned with statewide goals and legislative intent.    The purpose of the program is to identify and dedicate local behavioral health professionals as court liaisons in each state judicial district. The court liaisons shall facilitate communication and collaboration between judicial and behavioral health systems.       The program is designed to keep judges, district attorneys, and defense attorneys informed about available community-based behavioral health services, including services for defendants who have been ordered to undergo a competency evaluation or receive competency restoration services pursuant to article 8.5 of this title 16. The program is further designed to promote positive outcomes for individuals living with mental health or co-occurring behavioral health conditions.    On or before October 1, 2018, and as necessary thereafter, the state court administrator shall establish program procedures, timelines, funding guidelines, and acceptable expenses for the distribution of program funds to judicial districts. The state court administrator shall allocate program funding to judicial districts based on case volume, geographical complexity, and density of need.    The state court administrator shall implement capabilities within the existing statewide court data system to indicate behavioral health conditions in cases brought to the courts.    Each judicial district shall use allocated program money to partner with community mental health providers, such as a community mental health center, that are able to provide a continuum of community-based behavioral health services in their region to accomplish the program goals set forth in subsections (1) and (2) of this section. Program money may be used for the purposes established by the state court administrator pursuant to subsection (3) of this section, including but not limited to:   Program implementation and start-up costs determined necessary and appropriate by the state court administrator;    Contracting for an adequate number of dedicated court liaisons responsible for the duties set forth in section 16-11.9-204;    Prioritizing, through the court liaisons, cases where competency to proceed and restoration to competency are raised, and providing necessary services for such cases; and    Operational funding for court liaison activities as determined necessary and appropriate by the state court administrator.        History. Source: L. 2018: Entire part added,(SB 18-251), ch. 494, p. 2382, § 1, effective June 6.
CO Code § 16-11.9-205 (2021)
2021 Colorado Code|Title 16 - Criminal Proceedings|Article 11.9 - Persons With Behavioral or Mental Health Disorders in the Criminal Justice System|Part 2 - Statewide Behavioral Health Court Liaison Program|§ 16-11.9-205. Reporting Requirements

  The state court administrator shall collaborate with each judicial jurisdiction in the state and each court liaison to collect and analyze data regarding the work of the program, including data that demonstrates the impact of consultation, utilization of the court liaisons by judicial districts, and the efficiency of the program in promoting the legislative intent and statewide goals as set forth in this part 2.    Notwithstanding the provisions of section 24-1-136, on or before October 1, 2019, and each October 1 thereafter, the state court administrator shall report to the joint budget committee, or any successor committee, the number of cases in the past year for which a behavioral health condition was identified and resulted in a consultation pursuant to section 16-11.9-204, and outcomes related to the legislative intent and statewide goals of the program, as set forth in this part 2.     History. Source: L. 2018: Entire part added,(SB 18-251), ch. 404, p. 2384, § 1, effective June 6.
CO Code § 16-12-101.5 (2021)
2021 Colorado Code|Title 16 - Criminal Proceedings|Article 12 - Review of Judgments in Criminal Cases|Part 1 - Review|§ 16-12-101.5. Review of Proceedings Regarding Class 1 Felony Convictions - Legislative Intent

  The general assembly urges the Colorado supreme court to adopt an expedited process to review class 1 felony convictions where the death penalty has been imposed and any order by the district court granting or denying postconviction relief in such cases. It is the general assembly's intent that the Colorado supreme court give priority to cases in which a sentence of death has been imposed over other cases before the court, except to the extent of any conflict with the requirement that the court give the highest priority to enforcement actions brought in accordance with section 20 (1) of article X of the state constitution.    In any direct appeal of any class 1 felony case in which a conviction is entered and in which a sentence of death is imposed prior to the date upon which the Colorado supreme court adopts rules implementing the unitary system of review established by part 2 of this article, all challenges to any such conviction or sentence, with the exception of any newly discovered evidence or any claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, shall be included in the brief of the person challenging such conviction or sentence, as such brief is defined by rule 28 of the Colorado appellate rules, at the time such brief is filed with the supreme court of the state of Colorado. Any issue which is not raised in the manner prescribed in this section shall be deemed to be irrevocably waived by the person challenging such conviction or sentence. The failure of such person to file a brief within any time limits ordered by the supreme court of the state of Colorado shall constitute an irrevocable waiver of all issues which could have been raised in such brief.     History. Source: L. 91: Entire section added, p. 430, § 7, effective May 24. L. 94: Entire section amended, p. 1473, § 1, effective July 1. L. 97: (2) amended, p. 1582, § 4, effective June 4.
CO Code § 16-12-103 (2021)
2021 Colorado Code|Title 16 - Criminal Proceedings|Article 12 - Review of Judgments in Criminal Cases|Part 1 - Review|§ 16-12-103. Stays of Execution

 When a person has been convicted of an offense and a notice of appeal is filed, he shall be entitled to a stay of execution by compliance with the provisions and requirements of the applicable rules of the supreme court of Colorado.   History. Source: L. 72: R&RE, p. 253, § 1. C.R.S. 1963: § 39-12-103 .    Cross references:   For stay of execution in criminal appeals from county courts, see Crim. P. 37(f); for stay of execution in criminal appeals from district courts, see C.A.R. 8.1.   ANNOTATION   Law reviews. For article, “Colorado Criminal Procedure -- Does It Meet Minimum Standards?”, see 28 Dicta 14 (1951).   Annotator's note. Since § 16-12-103 is similar to repealed § 39-7-28 , CRS 53, and laws antecedent to CSA, C. 48, § 501, relevant cases construing those provisions have been included in the annotations to this section.   A stay of execution supersedes the judgment of the court below, and provides that no steps should be taken towards execution. Ritchey v. People, 22 Colo. 251 , 43 P. 1026 (1896).   It is not dependent upon the question of bail; but if, in the opinion of the court, the party ought to be let to bail pending the proceedings, an order for that purpose may also be made. Ritchey v. People, 22 Colo. 251 , 43 P. 1026 (1896).   Refusal to stay execution was abuse of discretion. Where a petitioner is adjudged guilty of contempt of court for refusal to answer questions before the grand jury and is sentenced to four months in jail, refusal of the trial court to stay execution or admit the petitioner to bail pending review by the supreme court is an abuse of discretion. Smaldone v. People, 153 Colo. 208 , 385 P.2d 127 (1963).
CO Code § 16-12-201 (2021)
2021 Colorado Code|Title 16 - Criminal Proceedings|Article 12 - Review of Judgments in Criminal Cases|Part 2 - Unitary Review in Death Penalty Cases|§ 16-12-201. Legislative Declaration

  The general assembly hereby declares that the purpose of this part 2 is to establish an expedited system of unitary review of class 1 felony cases in which a death sentence is imposed.    The general assembly finds that enactment of this part 2 will accomplish the following goals:   Ensuring compliance with the requirements of the federal “Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996”, 28 U.S.C. sec. 2261 et seq.;    Improving the accuracy, completeness, and justice of review proceedings by requiring that postconviction review commence immediately after the imposition of a sentence of death;    Allowing for the full and fair examination of all legally cognizable postconviction and appellate issues by the trial court and the Colorado supreme court; and    Eliminating, to the fullest extent possible, unreasonable and unjust delays in the resolution of postconviction issues by combining and reducing the number of proceedings in class 1 felony cases.        History. Source: L. 97: Entire part added, p. 1573, § 1, effective June 4.
CO Code § 16-12-202 (2021)
2021 Colorado Code|Title 16 - Criminal Proceedings|Article 12 - Review of Judgments in Criminal Cases|Part 2 - Unitary Review in Death Penalty Cases|§ 16-12-202. Unitary Procedure for Appeals - Scope and Applicability

  Notwithstanding any state statute or rule of the Colorado supreme court to the contrary, this part 2 and the supreme court rules adopted pursuant to this part 2 establish the only procedure for challenging a sentence of death or the conviction that resulted in the sentence of death.    This part 2 does not apply to class 1 felony cases in which a sentence of death is not sought or to class 1 felony convictions for which the death penalty is not imposed.    This part 2 shall apply to any class 1 felony conviction for which the death penalty is imposed as punishment, regardless of whether the sentence is imposed pursuant to section 18-1.3-1201, 18-1.3-1302, or 18-1.4-102, C.R.S., which death sentence is imposed on or after the date upon which the supreme court adopts rules implementing the unitary system of review established by this part 2.    For cases in which a death sentence is imposed prior to the date upon which the Colorado supreme court adopts rules implementing the unitary system of review established by this part 2, appellate review and postconviction review shall be as otherwise provided by law.     History. Source: L. 97: Entire part added, p. 1574, § 1, effective June 4. L. 2002: (3) amended, p. 1497, § 150, effective October 1. L. 2002, 3rd Ex. Sess.: (3) amended, p. 33, §§ 25, 26, effective July 12.    Cross references:   For the legislative declaration contained in the 2002 act amending subsection (3), see section 1 of chapter 318, Session Laws of Colorado 2002. For the legislative declaration contained in the 2002 act amending subsection (3), see section 16 of chapter 1 of the supplement to the Session Laws of Colorado 2002, Third Extraordinary Session.   ANNOTATION   The use of the phrase “class 1 felony conviction” in this part 2 does not eliminate issues concerning lesser felonies from its statutory scope. The context of this reference establishes a threshold requirement for the statute's application, rather than limiting the issues or convictions that can be reviewed in a case in which a death sentence has been imposed. People v. Owens, 219 P.3d 379 (Colo. App. 2009).
CO Code § 16-12-203 (2021)
2021 Colorado Code|Title 16 - Criminal Proceedings|Article 12 - Review of Judgments in Criminal Cases|Part 2 - Unitary Review in Death Penalty Cases|§ 16-12-203. Definitions

 As used in this part 2, unless the context otherwise requires:    “Direct appeal” means the appeal to the Colorado supreme court of any issues raised at the entry of a guilty plea, before trial, at trial, at the penalty phase hearing, or in a motion for new trial.    “Direct appeal counsel” means the attorney retained by the defendant, or appointed by the trial court to represent an indigent defendant, as the successor to trial counsel for purposes of representing the defendant in direct appeal proceedings.    “New postconviction counsel” means the attorney retained by the defendant, or appointed by the trial court to represent an indigent defendant, for the purposes of representing the defendant in postconviction review and postconviction review appeal proceedings. New postconviction counsel cannot have previously represented the defendant with regard to the class 1 felony charge.    “Postconviction review” means review as provided in this part 2 by the trial court that occurs after conviction in a class 1 felony case in which the death penalty is imposed as punishment.    “Postconviction review appeal” means the appeal to the Colorado supreme court of any issues raised in postconviction review proceedings.    “Trial counsel” means the attorney who represents the defendant with regard to the class 1 felony charge: For the purposes of any guilty plea; before trial; at trial; at the penalty phase hearing; for the purposes of a motion for new trial; for the purposes of postconviction review if the defendant chooses to continue with trial counsel for purposes of postconviction review; and for the purposes of direct appeal if the defendant chooses to continue with trial counsel for purposes of direct appeal. “Trial counsel” does not include new postconviction counsel appointed pursuant to section 16-12-205 or direct appeal counsel.     History. Source: L. 97: Entire part added, p. 1574, § 1, effective June 4.
CO Code § 16-12-204 (2021)
2021 Colorado Code|Title 16 - Criminal Proceedings|Article 12 - Review of Judgments in Criminal Cases|Part 2 - Unitary Review in Death Penalty Cases|§ 16-12-204. Stay of Execution - Postconviction Review

  The trial court, upon the imposition of a death sentence, shall set the time of execution pursuant to section 18-1.3-1205, C.R.S., and enter an order staying execution of the judgment and sentence until receipt of an order from the Colorado supreme court. The trial court shall direct the clerk of the trial court to mail to the Colorado supreme court immediately a copy of the judgment, sentence, and mittimus.    The trial court shall order the defendant, trial counsel, and the prosecution to attend a hearing to be held after the date upon which the sentence of death is imposed. At the hearing, the trial court shall:   Advise the defendant of the nature of review as provided in this part 2;    Advise the defendant of the right to direct appeal counsel;    Advise the defendant that the issue of ineffective assistance of trial counsel before trial, at trial, or during the penalty phase hearing may only be raised on postconviction review and on postconviction review appeal;    Advise the defendant that the issue of ineffective assistance of counsel during direct appeal by trial counsel or direct appeal counsel may only be raised by way of a petition for rehearing filed in the Colorado supreme court by new postconviction counsel or the defendant pursuant to the rules adopted by the Colorado supreme court to implement this part 2;    Determine whether the defendant intends to pursue postconviction review; and    If the defendant intends to pursue postconviction review, determine whether the defendant intends to proceed with or without counsel.       After a full discussion on the record, if the defendant knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waives the right to pursue postconviction review, trial counsel or direct appeal counsel, if appointed or retained, or the defendant, if proceeding without counsel, may file any notice of appeal with the Colorado supreme court, as provided by Colorado supreme court rule.     History. Source: L. 97: Entire part added, p. 1575, § 1, effective June 4. L. 2002: (1) amended, p. 1497, § 151, effective October 1. L. 2002, 3rd Ex. Sess.: (1) amended, p. 14, §§ 5, 6, effective July 12. L. 2012: (1) amended,(SB 12-175), ch. 208, p. 856, § 88, effective July 1.    Cross references:   For the legislative declaration contained in the 2002 act amending subsection (1), see section 1 of chapter 318, Session Laws of Colorado 2002. For the legislative declaration contained in the 2002 act amending subsection (1), see section 16 of chapter 1 of the supplement to the Session Laws of Colorado 2002, Third Extraordinary Session.
CO Code § 16-12-206 (2021)
2021 Colorado Code|Title 16 - Criminal Proceedings|Article 12 - Review of Judgments in Criminal Cases|Part 2 - Unitary Review in Death Penalty Cases|§ 16-12-206. Postconviction Review - Motion

     In any case in which a defendant has been convicted of a class 1 felony and been sentenced to death, all motions for postconviction review and all postconviction review proceedings are governed by this part 2 and by the supreme court rules adopted to implement this part 2.    Any motion for postconviction review shall state with particularity the grounds upon which the defendant intends to rely, including a statement of the facts and citations of law. A motion for postconviction review may include only those issues specified in paragraph (c) of this subsection (1) and shall not include any issues that were raised at the entry of any guilty plea, before trial, at trial, at the penalty phase hearing, or in the motion for new trial.    A motion for postconviction review may raise only the following issues:   Whether there exists evidence of material facts, not previously presented and heard, which by the exercise of reasonable diligence could not have been known or learned by the defendant or trial counsel prior to the imposition of the sentence and which require that the conviction or the death sentence be vacated in the interests of justice; or    Whether the conviction was obtained or the sentence was imposed in violation of the constitution or laws of the United States or Colorado; or    Whether the defendant was convicted under a statute that violates the constitution of the United States or Colorado or whether the conduct for which the defendant was prosecuted was constitutionally protected; or    Whether the judgment was rendered without jurisdiction over the defendant or the subject matter; or    Any other grounds that are properly the basis for collateral attack upon a criminal judgment; or    Whether trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance.          By alleging that trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance, the defendant automatically waives confidentiality pursuant to the provisions of section 18-1-417, C.R.S., between the defendant and trial counsel but only with respect to the information that is related to the defendant's claim of ineffective assistance.    Neither the defendant nor the prosecution may file a motion for reconsideration or rehearing of the trial court's ruling on the motion for postconviction review. The granting or denying of a motion for postconviction review under this section is a final order reviewable on appeal by the Colorado supreme court.     History. Source: L. 97: Entire part added, p. 1578, § 1, effective June 4. L. 2005: (2) amended, p. 424, § 3, effective April 29.