reglab/housing_qa huggingface dataset:
NY Crim Pro L § 50.20 (2021)
2021 New York Laws CPL - Criminal Procedure Part 1 - General Provisions Title C - General Principles Relating to Requirements for and Exemptions From Criminal Prosecution Article 50 - Compulsion of Evidence by Offer of Immunity 50.20 - Compulsion of Evidence by Offer of Immunity.

§ 50.20  Compulsion of evidence by offer of immunity.   1.    Any  witness  in  a  legal  proceeding,  other than a grand jury proceeding, may refuse to give evidence requested of him on  the  ground that  it  may tend to incriminate him and he may not, except as provided in subdivision two, be compelled to give such evidence.   2.   Such a witness may be  compelled  to  give  evidence  in  such  a proceeding   notwithstanding  an  assertion  of  his  privilege  against self-incrimination if:  (a)  The proceeding is one in which, by express provision of  statute, a  person  conducting  or  connected  therewith  is declared a competent authority to confer immunity upon witnesses therein; and  (b)  Such competent authority (i) orders  such  witness  to  give  the requested  evidence  notwithstanding  his  assertion  of  his  privilege against self-incrimination, and (ii) advises him that upon so  doing  he will receive immunity.   3.   A witness who is ordered to give evidence pursuant to subdivision two and who complies with such order receives immunity.  Such witness is not deprived of such immunity because such competent authority  did  not comply  with statutory provisions requiring notice to a specified public servant of intention to confer immunity.   4.      A  witness  who,  without  asserting  his  privilege   against self-incrimination,  gives  evidence  in a legal proceeding other than a grand jury proceeding does not receive immunity.   5.  The rules governing the circumstances in which  witnesses  may  be compelled  to  give evidence and in which they receive immunity therefor in a grand jury proceeding are prescribed in section 190.40.
NY Crim Pro L § 50.30 (2021)
2021 New York Laws CPL - Criminal Procedure Part 1 - General Provisions Title C - General Principles Relating to Requirements for and Exemptions From Criminal Prosecution Article 50 - Compulsion of Evidence by Offer of Immunity 50.30 - Authority to Confer Immunity in Criminal Proceedings; Court a Competent Authority.

§  50.30   Authority to confer immunity in criminal proceedings; court acompetent authority.In any criminal proceeding, other than a grand  jury  proceeding,  the   court is a competent authority to confer immunity in accordance with the   provisions  of  section  50.20, but only when expressly requested by the   district attorney to do so.
NY Crim Pro L § 60.10 (2021)
2021 New York Laws CPL - Criminal Procedure Part 1 - General Provisions Title D - Rules of Evidence, Standards of Proof and Related Matters Article 60 - Rules of Evidence and Related Matters 60.10 - Rules of Evidence; in General.

§ 60.10  Rules of evidence; in general.Unless  otherwise  provided  by  statute  or by judicially established   rules of evidence applicable to criminal cases, the  rules  of  evidence   applicable  to  civil  cases  are, where appropriate, also applicable to   criminal proceedings.
NY Crim Pro L § 60.15 (2021)
2021 New York Laws CPL - Criminal Procedure Part 1 - General Provisions Title D - Rules of Evidence, Standards of Proof and Related Matters Article 60 - Rules of Evidence and Related Matters 60.15 - Rules of Evidence; What Witnesses May Be Called.

§ 60.15  Rules of evidence; what witnesses may be called.1.    Unless  otherwise expressly provided, in any criminal proceeding   involving a defendant in which evidence is or may be received, both  the   people  and  the  defendant  may  as  a matter of right call and examine   witnesses, and each party may cross-examine every witness called by  the   other party.2.    A defendant may testify in his own behalf, but his failure to do   so is not a factor from which any inference unfavorable to  him  may  be   drawn.
NY Crim Pro L § 60.20 (2021)
2021 New York Laws CPL - Criminal Procedure Part 1 - General Provisions Title D - Rules of Evidence, Standards of Proof and Related Matters Article 60 - Rules of Evidence and Related Matters 60.20 - Rules of Evidence; Testimonial Capacity; Evidence Given by Children.

§  60.20  Rules  of  evidence;  testimonial  capacity; evidence given bychildren.1. Any person may be a witness in a  criminal  proceeding  unless  the   court  finds  that, by reason of infancy or mental disease or defect, he   does not possess sufficient intelligence  or  capacity  to  justify  the   reception of his evidence.2.  Every witness more than nine years old may testify only under oath   unless the court is satisfied that such witness cannot, as a  result  of   mental  disease  or  defect, understand the nature of an oath. A witness   less than nine years old may not testify under oath unless the court  is   satisfied  that  he  or  she understands the nature of an oath. If under   either of the above provisions, a witness is deemed to be ineligible  to   testify  under  oath,  the witness may nevertheless be permitted to give   unsworn evidence if the court is satisfied that  the  witness  possesses   sufficient intelligence and capacity to justify the reception thereof. A   witness  understands  the nature of an oath if he or she appreciates the   difference between truth and falsehood, the necessity  for  telling  the   truth,  and  the  fact  that  a  witness  who  testifies  falsely may be   punished.3. A defendant may not be convicted of an offense solely upon  unsworn   evidence given pursuant to subdivision two.
NY Crim Pro L § 60.22 (2021)
2021 New York Laws CPL - Criminal Procedure Part 1 - General Provisions Title D - Rules of Evidence, Standards of Proof and Related Matters Article 60 - Rules of Evidence and Related Matters 60.22 - Rules of Evidence; Corroboration of Accomplice Testimony.

§ 60.22  Rules of evidence; corroboration of accomplice testimony.   1.  A defendant may not be convicted of any offense upon the testimony of  an  accomplice  unsupported  by  corroborative  evidence  tending to connect the defendant with the commission of such offense.   2.   An "accomplice"  means  a  witness  in  a  criminal  action  who, according  to  evidence  adduced  in  such  action,  may  reasonably  be considered to have participated in:  (a)  The offense charged; or  (b)  An offense based upon the same or  some  of  the  same  facts  or conduct which constitute the offense charged.   3.  A witness who is an accomplice as defined in subdivision two is no less such because a prosecution or conviction of himself would be barred or  precluded by some defense or exemption, such as infancy, immunity or previous prosecution, amounting to a collateral  impediment  to  such  a prosecution  or  conviction,  not  affecting  the  conclusion  that such witness engaged in the conduct constituting the offense with the  mental state required for the commission thereof.
NY Crim Pro L § 60.30 (2021)
2021 New York Laws CPL - Criminal Procedure Part 1 - General Provisions Title D - Rules of Evidence, Standards of Proof and Related Matters Article 60 - Rules of Evidence and Related Matters 60.30 - Rules of Evidence; Identification by Means of Previous Recognition, in Addition to Present Identification.

§ 60.30 Rules   of   evidence;   identification  by  means  of  previousrecognition, in addition to present identification.In any criminal proceeding in which the defendant's commission  of  an   offense is in issue, a witness who testifies that (a) he or she observed   the  person claimed by the people to be the defendant either at the time   and place of the commission of the offense or upon some  other  occasion   relevant  to the case, and (b) on the basis of present recollection, the   defendant is the person in question and (c) on a subsequent occasion  he   or she observed the defendant, or where the observation is made pursuant   to  a  blind  or  blinded  procedure,  as  defined  in  paragraph (c) of   subdivision  one  of  section  60.25  of  this  article,  a   pictorial,   photographic,  electronic,  filmed or video recorded reproduction of the   defendant, under circumstances consistent with such rights as an accused   person may derive under the constitution of this state or of the  United   States,   and  then  also  recognized  him  or  her  or  the  pictorial,   photographic, electronic, filmed or video recorded reproduction  of  him   or  her  as  the same person whom he or she had observed on the first or   incriminating occasion, may, in addition to making an identification  of   the  defendant  at  the  criminal  proceeding  on  the  basis of present   recollection as the person whom he or  she  observed  on  the  first  or   incriminating occasion, also describe his or her previous recognition of   the  defendant  and  testify  that the person whom he or she observed or   whose pictorial, photographic,  electronic,  filmed  or  video  recorded   reproduction  he  or  she  observed  on such second occasion is the same   person whom he or  she  had  observed  on  the  first  or  incriminating   occasion.  Such  testimony and such pictorial, photographic, electronic,   filmed or video recorded reproduction constitutes evidence in chief.
NY Crim Pro L § 60.35 (2021)
2021 New York Laws CPL - Criminal Procedure Part 1 - General Provisions Title D - Rules of Evidence, Standards of Proof and Related Matters Article 60 - Rules of Evidence and Related Matters 60.35 - Rules of Evidence; Impeachment of Own Witness by Proof of Prior Contradictory Statement.

§ 60.35  Rules of evidence; impeachment of own witness by proof of priorcontradictory statement.1.  When, upon examination by the party who called him, a witness in a   criminal  proceeding  gives  testimony upon a material issue of the case   which tends to disprove the position  of  such  party,  such  party  may   introduce  evidence  that  such  witness  has  previously  made either a   written statement  signed  by  him  or  an  oral  statement  under  oath   contradictory to such testimony.2.    Evidence  concerning  a prior contradictory statement introduced   pursuant to subdivision one may be received  only  for  the  purpose  of   impeaching  the credibility of the witness with respect to his testimony   upon the subject, and does not  constitute  evidence  in  chief.    Upon   receiving  such evidence at a jury trial, the court must so instruct the   jury.3.   When a witness  has  made  a  prior  signed  or  sworn  statement   contradictory  to his testimony in a criminal proceeding upon a material   issue of the case, but his testimony  does  not  tend  to  disprove  the   position  of  the  party  who  called  him  and elicited such testimony,   evidence that the witness made such prior statement is  not  admissible,   and  such  party  may  not  use  such prior statement for the purpose of   refreshing the recollection of the witness in a  manner  that  discloses   its contents to the trier of the facts.
NY Crim Pro L § 60.40 (2021)
2021 New York Laws CPL - Criminal Procedure Part 1 - General Provisions Title D - Rules of Evidence, Standards of Proof and Related Matters Article 60 - Rules of Evidence and Related Matters 60.40 - Rules of Evidence; Proof of Previous Conviction; When Allowed.

§ 60.40  Rules of evidence; proof of previous conviction; when allowed.1.   If in the course of a criminal proceeding, any witness, including   a defendant, is properly asked whether he was previously convicted of  a   specified offense and answers in the negative or in an equivocal manner,   the party adverse to the one who called him may independently prove such   conviction.    If in response to proper inquiry whether he has ever been   convicted of any offense the witness answers in the negative  or  in  an   equivocal manner, the adverse party may independently prove any previous   conviction of the witness.2.   If a defendant in a criminal proceeding, through the testimony of   a witness called by him, offers evidence  of  his  good  character,  the   people  may independently prove any previous conviction of the defendant   for an offense  the  commission  of  which  would  tend  to  negate  any   character  trait or quality attributed to the defendant in such witness'   testimony.3.   Subject to the limitations  prescribed  in  section  200.60,  the   people  may  prove  that a defendant has been previously convicted of an   offense when the fact of such previous conviction constitutes an element   of the offense charged, or proof thereof is otherwise essential  to  the   establishment of a legally sufficient case.
NY Crim Pro L § 60.42 (2021)
2021 New York Laws CPL - Criminal Procedure Part 1 - General Provisions Title D - Rules of Evidence, Standards of Proof and Related Matters Article 60 - Rules of Evidence and Related Matters 60.42 - Rules of Evidence; Admissibility of Evidence of Victim's Sexual Conduct in Sex Offense Cases.

§  60.42 Rules of evidence; admissibility of evidence of victim's sexualconduct in sex offense cases.Evidence of a victim's sexual conduct shall not  be  admissible  in  a   prosecution for an offense or an attempt to commit an offense defined in   article  one hundred thirty or in section 230.34 of the penal law unless   such evidence:1. proves or tends to prove specific instances of the  victim's  prior   sexual conduct with the accused; or2.  proves  or tends to prove that the victim has been convicted of an   offense under section 230.00 of the penal law within three  years  prior   to the sex offense which is the subject of the prosecution; or3. rebuts evidence introduced by the people of the victim's failure to   engage  in  sexual intercourse, oral sexual conduct, anal sexual conduct   or sexual contact during a given period of time; or4. rebuts evidence introduced by the people which proves or  tends  to   prove  that  the  accused  is  the  cause of pregnancy or disease of the   victim, or the source of semen found in the victim; or5. is determined by the court after an offer of proof by  the  accused   outside  the  hearing  of  the  jury,  or  such hearing as the court may   require, and a statement by the court of its findings of fact  essential   to  its determination, to be relevant and admissible in the interests of   justice.
NY Crim Pro L § 60.43 (2021)
2021 New York Laws CPL - Criminal Procedure Part 1 - General Provisions Title D - Rules of Evidence, Standards of Proof and Related Matters Article 60 - Rules of Evidence and Related Matters 60.43 - Rules of Evidence; Admissibility of Evidence of Victim's Sexual Conduct in Non-Sex Offense Cases.

§ 60.43 Rules  of evidence; admissibility of evidence of victim's sexualconduct in non-sex offense cases.Evidence of the victim's sexual conduct,  including  the  past  sexual   conduct  of  a deceased victim, may not be admitted in a prosecution for   any offense, attempt to commit an offense or  conspiracy  to  commit  an   offense  defined  in the penal law unless such evidence is determined by   the court to be relevant and admissible in  the  interests  of  justice,   after  an  offer  of proof by the proponent of such evidence outside the   hearing of the jury, or such hearing as the court  may  require,  and  a   statement  by  the  court  of  its  findings  of  fact  essential to its   determination.
NY Crim Pro L § 60.44 (2021)
2021 New York Laws CPL - Criminal Procedure Part 1 - General Provisions Title D - Rules of Evidence, Standards of Proof and Related Matters Article 60 - Rules of Evidence and Related Matters 60.44 - Use of Anatomically Correct Dolls.

§ 60.44 Use of anatomically correct dolls.Any person who is less than sixteen years old may in the discretion of   the court and where helpful and appropriate, use an anatomically correct   doll   in  testifying  in  a  criminal  proceeding  based  upon  conduct   prohibited by article one hundred thirty, article two hundred  sixty  or   section 255.25, 255.26 or 255.27 of the penal law.
NY Crim Pro L § 60.46 (2021)
2021 New York Laws CPL - Criminal Procedure Part 1 - General Provisions Title D - Rules of Evidence, Standards of Proof and Related Matters Article 60 - Rules of Evidence and Related Matters 60.46 - Rules of Evidence, Family Offense Proceedings in Family Court.

§ 60.46 Rules of evidence, family offense proceedings in family court.Evidence  of  a  written  or  oral admission or any testimony given by   either party, or evidence  derived  therefrom,  in  a  proceeding  under   article  eight of the family court act without the benefit of counsel in   such proceeding  may  not  be  received  into  evidence  in  a  criminal   proceeding  except  for  the  purposes  of impeachment unless such party   waives the right to counsel on  the  record.  Nothing  herein  shall  be   deemed to prohibit any testimony or exhibits received into evidence in a   criminal  proceeding, or any orders, decisions or judgments arising from   such proceeding from being received  into  evidence  in  any  proceeding   under article eight of the family court act.
NY Crim Pro L § 60.47 (2021)
2021 New York Laws CPL - Criminal Procedure Part 1 - General Provisions Title D - Rules of Evidence, Standards of Proof and Related Matters Article 60 - Rules of Evidence and Related Matters 60.47 - Possession of Condoms; Receipt Into Evidence.

§ 60.47 Possession of condoms; receipt into evidence.Evidence  that  a  person was in possession of one or more condoms may   not be admitted  at  any  trial,  hearing,  or  other  proceeding  in  a   prosecution  for  section  230.00  of  the  penal law for the purpose of   establishing probable cause  for  an  arrest  or  proving  any  person's   commission or attempted commission of such offense.
NY Crim Pro L § 60.48 (2021)
2021 New York Laws CPL - Criminal Procedure Part 1 - General Provisions Title D - Rules of Evidence, Standards of Proof and Related Matters Article 60 - Rules of Evidence and Related Matters 60.48 - Rules of Evidence; Admissibility of Evidence of Victim's Manner of Dress in Sex Offense Cases.

§  60.48 Rules of evidence; admissibility of evidence of victim's mannerof dress in sex offense cases.Evidence of the manner in which the victim was dressed at the time  of   the  commission  of  an offense may not be admitted in a prosecution for   any offense, or an attempt to commit an offense, defined in article  one   hundred  thirty  of the penal law, unless such evidence is determined by   the court to be relevant and admissible in  the  interests  of  justice,   after  an  offer  of proof by the proponent of such evidence outside the   hearing of the jury, or such hearing as the court  may  require,  and  a   statement  by  the  court  of  its  findings  of  fact  essential to its   determination.
NY Crim Pro L § 60.49 (2021)
2021 New York Laws CPL - Criminal Procedure Part 1 - General Provisions Title D - Rules of Evidence, Standards of Proof and Related Matters Article 60 - Rules of Evidence and Related Matters 60.49 - Possession of Opioid Antagonists; Receipt Into Evidence.

* § 60.49 Possession of opioid antagonists; receipt into evidence.1.  Evidence  that  a person was in possession of an opioid antagonist   may not be admitted at any trial,  hearing  or  other  proceeding  in  a   prosecution  for  any  offense  under  sections  220.03, 220.06, 220.09,   220.16,  220.18,  or  220.21  of  the  penal  law  for  the  purpose  of   establishing  probable  cause  for  an  arrest  or  proving any person's   commission of such offense.2. For the purposes of this section, opioid antagonist is defined as a   drug  approved  by  the  Food  and  Drug   Administration   that,   when   administered,   negates   or   neutralizes  in  whole  or  in  part  the   pharmacological effects of an opioid in the body and shall be limited to   naloxone and other medications approved by the department of health  for   such purpose.* NB Effective December 6, 2021
NY Crim Pro L § 60.50 (2021)
2021 New York Laws CPL - Criminal Procedure Part 1 - General Provisions Title D - Rules of Evidence, Standards of Proof and Related Matters Article 60 - Rules of Evidence and Related Matters 60.50 - Rules of Evidence; Statements of Defendants; Corroboration.

§ 60.50  Rules of evidence; statements of defendants; corroboration.A person may not be convicted of any offense solely upon evidence of a   confession  or  admission  made by him without additional proof that the   offense charged has been committed.
NY Crim Pro L § 60.55 (2021)
2021 New York Laws CPL - Criminal Procedure Part 1 - General Provisions Title D - Rules of Evidence, Standards of Proof and Related Matters Article 60 - Rules of Evidence and Related Matters 60.55 - Rules of Evidence; Psychiatric Testimony in Certain Cases.

§ 60.55  Rules of evidence; psychiatric testimony in certain cases.1.  When,  in  connection  with  the  affirmative  defense  of lack of   criminal responsibility  by  reason  of  mental  disease  or  defect,  a   psychiatrist  or  licensed  psychologist testifies at a trial concerning   the defendant's mental condition at the time of the conduct  charged  to   constitute  a  crime, he must be permitted to make a statement as to the   nature of any examination of the defendant, the diagnosis of the  mental   condition  of the defendant and his opinion as to the extent, if any, to   which the capacity of the defendant to know or appreciate the nature and   consequence of such conduct, or its  wrongfulness,  was  impaired  as  a   result of mental disease or defect at that time.The  psychiatrist  or  licensed psychologist must be permitted to make   any explanation reasonably serving to clarify his diagnosis and opinion,   and may be cross-examined as to any matter bearing on his competency  or   credibility or the validity of his diagnosis or opinion.2.  Any  statement made by the defendant to a psychiatrist or licensed   psychologist  during  his  examination  of  the   defendant   shall   be   inadmissible in evidence on any issue other than that of the affirmative   defense  of lack of criminal responsibility, by reason of mental disease   or defect. The statement shall, however, be admissible upon the issue of   the affirmative defense of lack of criminal responsibility by reason  of   mental  disease or defect, whether or not it would otherwise be deemed a   privileged communication. Upon receiving the statement in evidence,  the   court must instruct the jury that the statement is to be considered only   on the issue of such affirmative defense and may not be considered by it   in  its  determination  of  whether  the  defendant  committed  the  act   constituting the crime charged.
NY Crim Pro L § 60.60 (2021)
2021 New York Laws CPL - Criminal Procedure Part 1 - General Provisions Title D - Rules of Evidence, Standards of Proof and Related Matters Article 60 - Rules of Evidence and Related Matters 60.60 - Rules of Evidence; Certificates Concerning Judgments of Conviction and Fingerprints.

§  60.60    Rules  of  evidence;  certificates  concerning  judgments ofconviction and fingerprints.1.  A certificate issued by a criminal court, or  the  clerk  thereof,   certifying  that a judgment of conviction against a designated defendant   has been entered in such court, constitutes presumptive evidence of  the   facts stated in such certificate.2.   A report of a public servant charged with the custody of official   fingerprint records which contains a certification that the fingerprints   of a designated person who has previously been convicted of  an  offense   are   identical  with  those  of  a  defendant  in  a  criminal  action,   constitutes presumptive evidence of the fact  that  such  defendant  has   previously been convicted of such offense.