GA Code § 5-6-34 (2021)
2021 Georgia Code|Title 5 - Appeal and Error|Chapter 6 - Certiorari and Appeals to Appellate Courts Generally|Article 2 - Appellate Practice|§ 5-6-34. Judgments and Rulings Deemed Directly Appealable; Procedure for Review of Judgments, Orders, or Decisions Not Subject to Direct Appeal; Scope of Review; Hearings in Criminal Cases Involving a Capital Offense for Which Death Penalty Is Sought; Appeals Involving Nonmonetary Judgments in Child Custody Cases

  Appeals may be taken to the Supreme Court and the Court of Appeals from the following judgments and rulings of the superior courts, the Georgia State-wide Business Court, the constitutional city courts, and such other courts or tribunals from which appeals are authorized by the Constitution and laws of this state:   All final judgments, that is to say, where the case is no longer pending in the court below, except as provided in Code Section 5-6-35;   All judgments involving applications for discharge in bail trover and contempt cases;   All judgments or orders directing that an accounting be had;   All judgments or orders granting or refusing applications for receivers or for interlocutory or final injunctions;   All judgments or orders granting or refusing applications for attachment against fraudulent debtors;   Any ruling on a motion which would be dispositive if granted with respect to a defense that the action is barred by Code Section 16-11-173;   All judgments or orders granting or refusing to grant mandamus or any other extraordinary remedy, except with respect to temporary restraining orders;   All judgments or orders refusing applications for dissolution of corporations created by the superior courts;   All judgments or orders sustaining motions to dismiss a caveat to the probate of a will;   All judgments or orders entered pursuant to subsection (c) of Code Section 17-10-6.2;   All judgments or orders in child custody cases awarding, refusing to change, or modifying child custody or holding or declining to hold persons in contempt of such child custody judgment or orders;   All judgments or orders entered pursuant to Code Section 35-3-37; and   All judgments or orders entered pursuant to Code Section 9-11-11.1.     Where the trial judge in rendering an order, decision, or judgment, not otherwise subject to direct appeal, including but not limited to the denial of a defendant's motion to recuse in a criminal case, certifies within ten days of entry thereof that the order, decision, or judgment is of such importance to the case that immediate review should be had, the Supreme Court or the Court of Appeals may thereupon, in their respective discretions, permit an appeal to be taken from the order, decision, or judgment if application is made thereto within ten days after such certificate is granted. The application shall be in the nature of a petition and shall set forth the need for such an appeal and the issue or issues involved therein. The applicant may, at his or her election, include copies of such parts of the record as he or she deems appropriate, but no certification of such copies by the clerk of the trial court shall be necessary. The application shall be filed with the clerk of the Supreme Court or the Court of Appeals and a copy of the application, together with a list of those parts of the record included with the application, shall be served upon the opposing party or parties in the case in the manner prescribed by Code Section 5-6-32, except that such service shall be perfected at or before the filing of the application. The opposing party or parties shall have ten days from the date on which the application is filed in which to file a response. The response may be accompanied by copies of the record in the same manner as is allowed with the application. The Supreme Court or the Court of Appeals shall issue an order granting or denying such an appeal within 45 days of the date on which the application was filed. Within ten days after an order is issued granting the appeal, the applicant, to secure a review of the issues, may file a notice of appeal as provided in Code Section 5-6-37. The notice of appeal shall act as a supersedeas as provided in Code Section 5-6-46 and the procedure thereafter shall be the same as in an appeal from a final judgment.   In criminal cases involving a capital offense for which the death penalty is sought, a hearing shall be held as provided in Code Section 17-10-35.2 to determine if there shall be a review of pretrial proceedings by the Supreme Court prior to a trial before a jury. Review of pretrial proceedings, if ordered by the trial court, shall be exclusively as provided by Code Section 17-10-35.1 and no certificate of immediate review shall be necessary.   Where an appeal is taken under any provision of subsection (a), (b), or (c) of this Code section, all judgments, rulings, or orders rendered in the case which are raised on appeal and which may affect the proceedings below shall be reviewed and determined by the appellate court, without regard to the appealability of the judgment, ruling, or order standing alone and without regard to whether the judgment, ruling, or order appealed from was final or was appealable by some other express provision of law contained in this Code section, or elsewhere. For purposes of review by the appellate court, one or more judgments, rulings, or orders by the trial court held to be erroneous on appeal shall not be deemed to have rendered all subsequent proceedings nugatory; but the appellate court shall in all cases review all judgments, rulings, or orders raised on appeal which may affect the proceedings below and which were rendered subsequent to the first judgment, ruling, or order held erroneous. Nothing in this subsection shall require the appellate court to pass upon questions which are rendered moot.   Where an appeal is taken pursuant to this Code section for a judgment or order granting nonmonetary relief in a child custody case, such judgment or order shall stand until reversed or modified by the reviewing court unless the trial court states otherwise in its judgment or order.    (Orig. Code 1863, § 4159; Code 1868, § 4191; Code 1873, § 4250; Code 1882, § 4250; Ga. L. 1890-91, p. 82, § 1; Civil Code 1895, § 5526; Penal Code 1895, § 1069; Civil Code 1910, § 6138; Penal Code 1910, § 1096; Code 1933, § 6-701; Ga. L. 1965, p. 18, § 1; Ga. L. 1968, p. 1072, § 1; Ga. L. 1975, p. 757, § 1; Ga. L. 1979, p. 619, §§ 1, 2; Ga. L. 1984, p. 599, § 1; Ga. L. 1988, p. 1437, § 1; Ga. L. 1994, p. 347, § 1; Ga. L. 2001, p. 88, § 1; Ga. L. 2005, p. 20, § 2/HB 170; Ga. L. 2005, p. 224, § 2/HB 221; Ga. L. 2006, p. 379, § 2/HB 1059; Ga. L. 2006, p. 583, § 1/SB 382; Ga. L. 2007, p. 554, § 2/HB 369; Ga. L. 2011, p. 562, § 1/SB 139; Ga. L. 2012, p. 899, § 8-1/HB 1176; Ga. L. 2013, p. 735, § 1/SB 204; Ga. L. 2016, p. 341, § 1/HB 513; Ga. L. 2019, p. 845, § 2-3/HB 239.)    The 2011 amendment,  effective July 1, 2011, added subsection (e). See editor's note for applicability.    The 2012 amendment,  effective July 1, 2013, in subsection (a), deleted "and" at the end of paragraph (a)(10), substituted "; and" for the period at the end of paragraph (a)(11), and added paragraph (a)(12).    The 2013 amendment,  effective May 6, 2013, substituted "awarding, refusing to change, or modifying child custody" for "including, but not limited to, awarding or refusing to change child custody" in paragraph (a)(11).    The 2016 amendment,  effective July 1, 2016, deleted "and" at the end of paragraph (a)(11); substituted "; and" for a period at the end of paragraph (a)(12); and added paragraph (a)(13).    The 2019 amendment,  effective May 7, 2019, inserted "the Georgia State-wide Business Court," in the middle of the introductory paragraph of subsection (a).   Cross references.   - Certification for immediate review of nonfinal judgments, § 5-7-2.    Applicability of section to orders denying summary judgment, see § 9-11-56.    Right of appeal by first offenders placed on probation, see § 42-8-64.   Granting of application for leave to appeal interlocutory order, Rules of the Supreme Court of the State of Georgia, Rule 22.   Jurisdictional statement and copy of order and compliance with statutory duty to file notice of appeal, Rules of the Supreme Court of the State of Georgia, Rule 24.   Leave to appeal interlocutory order, Rules of the Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia, Rule 29.   Leave to appeal, Rules of the Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia, Rule 40.   Code Commission notes.   - Pursuant to Code Section 28-9-5, in 2006, "and" was added to the end of paragraph (a)(9), former paragraph (a)(10), which read: "Repealed; and" was deleted, and former paragraph (a)(11) was redesignated as present paragraph (a)(10).   Pursuant to Code Section 28-9-5, in 2009, "Code Section 16-11-173" was substituted for "Code Section 16-11-184" at the end of paragraph (a)(6).   Editor's notes.   - Ga. L. 2001, p. 88, § 3, not codified by the General Assembly, provides that: "This Act shall apply to any case pending on or brought after the effective date of this Act; and, for purposes of taking an appeal pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (5.1) of subsection (a) of Code Section 5-6-34 as enacted by this Act, any ruling actually entered before the effective date of this Act in any case which is pending on the effective date of this Act shall be deemed to have been entered on the effective date of this Act." The effective date of this Act was March 23, 2001.   Ga. L. 2005, p. 20, § 1/HB 170, not codified by the General Assembly, provides that: "This Act shall be known and may be cited as the 'Criminal Justice Act of 2005.'"   Ga. L. 2005, p. 20, § 17/HB 170, not codified by the General Assembly, provides that this Act shall apply to all trials which commence on or after July 1, 2005.   Ga. L. 2005, p. 224, § 1/HB 221, not codified by the General Assembly, provides that: "The General Assembly finds and declares that it is important to assess periodically child support guidelines and determine whether existing guidelines continue to be viable and effective or whether they have failed or ceased to accomplish their original policy objectives. The General Assembly further finds that supporting Georgia's children is vitally important to the citizens of Georgia. Therefore, the General Assembly has determined that it is in the best interests of the state and its citizenry to undertake an evaluation of the child support guidelines on a continuing basis. The General Assembly declares that it is important that all of Georgia's children are provided with adequate financial support whether the children's parents are living together or not living together. The General Assembly finds that both parents have a continuing obligation with respect to providing financial and emotional stability for their child or children. It is the hope of the members of the General Assembly that all parents work together to advance the best interest of their children."   Ga. L. 2006, p. 379, § 1/HB 1059, not codified by the General Assembly, provides that: "The General Assembly finds and declares that recidivist sexual offenders, sexual offenders who use physical violence, and sexual offenders who prey on children are sexual predators who present an extreme threat to the public safety. Many sexual offenders are extremely likely to use physical violence and to repeat their offenses; and some sexual offenders commit many offenses, have many more victims than are ever reported, and are prosecuted for only a fraction of their crimes. The General Assembly finds that this makes the cost of sexual offender victimization to society at large, while incalculable, clearly exorbitant. The General Assembly further finds that the high level of threat that a sexual predator presents to the public safety, and the long-term effects suffered by victims of sex offenses, provide the state with sufficient justification to implement a strategy that includes:   "(1) Incarcerating sexual offenders and maintaining adequate facilities to ensure that decisions to release sexual predators into the community are not made on the basis of inadequate space;   "(2) Requiring the registration of sexual offenders, with a requirement that complete and accurate information be maintained and accessible for use by law enforcement authorities, communities, and the public;   "(3) Providing for community and public notification concerning the presence of sexual offenders;   "(4) Collecting data relative to sexual offenses and sexual offenders;   "(5) Requiring sexual predators who are released into the community to wear an electronic monitoring system for the rest of their natural life and to pay for such system; and   "(6) Prohibiting sexual predators from working with children, either for compensation or as a volunteer.   "The General Assembly further finds that the state has a compelling interest in protecting the public from sexual offenders and in protecting children from predatory sexual activity, and there is sufficient justification for requiring sexual offenders to register and for requiring community and public notification of the presence of sexual offenders. The General Assembly declares that in order to protect the public, it is necessary that the sexual offenders be registered and that members of the community and the public be notified of a sexual offender's presence. The designation of a person as a sexual offender is neither a sentence nor a punishment but simply a regulatory mechanism and status resulting from the conviction of certain crimes. Likewise, the designation of a person as a sexual predator is neither a sentence nor a punishment but simply a regulatory mechanism and status resulting from findings by the Sexual Offender Registration Review Board and a court if requested by a sexual offender."   Ga. L. 2006, p. 379, § 30(c)/HB 1059, not codified by the General Assembly, provides that: "The provisions of this Act shall not affect or abate the status as a crime of any such act or omission which occurred prior to the effective date of the Act repealing, repealing and reenacting, or amending such law, nor shall the prosecution of such crime be abated as a result of such repeal, repeal and reenactment, or amendment."   Ga. L. 2006, p. 583, § 8/SB 382, not codified by the General Assembly, amended Ga. L. 2005, p. 224, § 13, so as to delay the effective date of the 2005 amendment to subsection (a) of this Code section until January 1, 2007.   Ga. L. 2006, p. 583, § 9/SB 382, not codified by the General Assembly, provided that it was the intention of the 2006 Act to delay for six months the effectiveness of the provisions of 2005 Act No. 52 (Ga. L. 2005, p. 224) of the General Assembly, excepting only those provisions of 2005 Act No. 52 (Ga. L. 2005, p. 224) creating the Georgia Child Support Commission which went into effect upon approval of that Act by the Governor.   Ga. L. 2006, p. 583, § 10(b)/SB 382, not codified by the General Assembly, provides: "Sections 1 through 7 of this Act shall become effective on January 1, 2007, and shall apply to all pending civil actions on or after January 1, 2007."   Ga. L. 2007, p. 554, § 1/HB 369, not codified by the General Assembly, provides that: "The General Assembly of Georgia declares that it is the policy of this state to assure that minor children have frequent and continuing contact with parents who have shown the ability to act in the best interests of their children and to encourage parents to share in the rights and responsibilities of rearing their children after the parents have separated or dissolved their marriage or relationship."   Ga. L. 2007, p. 554, § 8/HB 369, not codified by the General Assembly, provides that the 2007 amendment applies to all child custody proceedings and modifications of child custody filed on or after January 1, 2008.   Ga. L. 2011, p. 562, § 4/SB 139, not codified by the General Assembly, provides that the amendment by that Act shall apply to all notices or applications for appeal filed on or after July 1, 2011.   Law reviews.   - For article discussing the inefficiency of mandamus and impeachment as remedies for judicial inaction, see 5 Ga. St. B.J. 467 (1969). For article surveying Georgia cases in the area of trial practice and procedure from June 1977 through May 1978, see 30 Mercer L. Rev. 239 (1978). For article surveying judicial developments in Georgia's trial practice and procedure laws, see 31 Mercer L. Rev. 249 (1979). For article surveying developments in Georgia trial practice and procedure from mid-1980 through mid-1981, see 33 Mercer L. Rev. 275 (1981). For article surveying appellate practice and procedure, see 34 Mercer L. Rev. 3 (1982). For article surveying recent developments in administrative law, see 37 Mercer L. Rev. 503 (1985). For annual survey of appellate practice and procedure, see 38 Mercer L. Rev. 47 (1986). For annual survey of trial practice and procedure, see 38 Mercer L. Rev. 383 (1986). For annual survey of appellate practice and procedure, see 40 Mercer L. Rev. 51 (1988). For article, "Intangible Tax Appeals After Blank v. Collins; The Uncertainty Continues," see 27 Ga. St. B.J. 78 (1990). For article, "Let's Revise Appellate Procedure in Georgia," see 27 Ga. St. B.J. 135 (1991). For article, "Getting Certiorari Granted," 28 Ga. St. B.J. 90 (1991). For annual survey of appellate practice and procedure, see 43 Mercer L. Rev. 73 (1991). For annual survey of domestic relations, see 43 Mercer L. Rev. 243 (1991). For article, "Appeals, Interlocutory and Discretionary Applications, and Post-Judgment Motions in the Georgia Courts: The Current Practice and the Need for Reform Legislation," see 44 Mercer L. Rev. 17 (1992). For annual survey of appellate practice and procedure, see 56 Mercer L. Rev. 61 (2004). For annual survey of domestic relations law, see 56 Mercer L. Rev. 221 (2004). For annual survey of appellate practice and procedure, see 57 Mercer L. Rev. 35 (2005). For annual survey of domestic relations cases, see 57 Mercer L. Rev. 173 (2005). For article on 2005 amendment of this Code section, see 22 Ga. St. U.L. Rev. 73 (2005). For article on 2006 amendment of this Code section, see 23 Ga. St. U.L. Rev. 11, 103 (2006). For survey article on appellate practice and procedure, see 59 Mercer L. Rev. 21 (2007). For survey article on domestic relations law, see 59 Mercer L. Rev. 139 (2007). For survey article on administrative law, see 60 Mercer L. Rev. 1 (2008). For survey article on appellate practice and procedure, see 60 Mercer L. Rev. 21 (2008). For annual survey on appellate practice and procedure, see 61 Mercer L. Rev. 31 (2009). For annual survey on domestic relations, see 61 Mercer L. Rev. 117 (2009). For annual survey of law on appellate practice and procedure, see 62 Mercer L. Rev. 25 (2010). For article, "Appellate Practice and Procedure," see 63 Mercer L. Rev. 67 (2011). For article on the 2012 amendment of this Code section, see 29 Ga. St. U.L. Rev. 290 (2012). For annual survey on trial practice and procedure, see 65 Mercer L. Rev. 277 (2013). For article on the 2016 amendment of this Code section, see 33 Georgia St. U.L. Rev. 109 (2016). For article, "Annual Survey of Georgia Law: June 1, 2015 - May 31, 2016: Special Contribution: Open Chambers Revisited: Demystifying the Inner Workings and Culture of the Georgia Court of Appeals," see 68 Mercer L. Rev. 1 (2016). For annual survey on zoning and land use law, see 70 Mercer L. Rev. 301 (2018). For article on the 2019 amendment of this Code section, see 36 Ga. St. U.L. Rev. 1 (2019). For annual survey on domestic relations, see 71 Mercer L. Rev. 83 (2019). For annual survey on trial practice and procedure, see 71 Mercer L. Rev. 305 (2019). For note, "Give It to Me, I'm Worth It: The Need to Amend Georgia's Record Restriction Statute to Provide Ex-Offenders with a Second Chance in the Employment Sector," see 52 Ga. L. Rev. 267 (2017). For comment on Sayers v. Rothberg, 222 Ga. 626, 151 S.E.2d 445 (1967), see 3 Ga. St. B.J. 489 (1967). For comment on Milholland v. Oglesby, 223 Ga. 230, 154 S.E.2d 194 (1967), see 4 Ga. St. B.J. 392 (1968).   JUDICIAL DECISIONS   ANALYSIS    General Consideration   What Are Final, Appealable Judgments   Rulings Not Appealable Without Certificate   Summary Judgments   Judgments on Motions for New Trial   Injunctions and Restraining Orders   Judgments of Contempt   Review of Collateral Judgments, Rulings, or Orders   Moot Issues   Application    OPINIONS OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL    Appeals from a municipal court conviction of a traffic offense  may lie in the Court of Appeals or in the superior court depending on the status of the municipal court and the nature of the offense. 1985 Op. Att'y Gen. No. U85-18.   RESEARCH REFERENCES   Am. Jur. 2d.   - 4 Am. Jur. 2d, Appellate Review, § 1 et seq.   2 Am. Jur. Pleading and Practice Forms, Appeal and Error, § 2.   ALR.    - Will questions which might have been, but were not, raised on prior appeal or error, be considered on subsequent appeal or error, 1 A.L.R. 725.    Right to appeal from order releasing one in extradition proceedings, 5 A.L.R. 1156.    Judgment on claim as bar to action to recover amount of payment which was not litigated in previous action, 13 A.L.R. 1151.    Appeal as affecting time allowed by judgment or order appealed from for the performance of a condition affecting a substantive right or obligation, 28 A.L.R. 1029.    Coram nobis on ground of newly discovered evidence, 33 A.L.R. 84.    First decision of intermediate court as law of the case on appeal to court of last resort from subsequent decision, 41 A.L.R. 1078, 118 A.L.R. 1286.    Conduct of party in court room tending improperly to influence jury as ground for reversal or new trial, 57 A.L.R. 62.    Abatement of action which does not survive, by death of party pending appeal or writ of error, 62 A.L.R. 1048.    Judgment or order dismissing action as against one defendant as subject of appeal or error before disposition of case as against codefendant, 80 A.L.R. 1186; 114 A.L.R. 759.    Power of appellate court to reconsider its decision after mandate has issued, 84 A.L.R. 579.    Criticism in judge's charge to jury of argument of defendant's counsel in criminal case, 86 A.L.R. 899.    Who entitled to appeal from decree admitting will to probate or denying probate, 88 A.L.R. 1158.    Right of bankrupt after adjudication to take or prosecute appeal from or otherwise review a judgment against him, 92 A.L.R. 291.    Change of law after decision of lower court as affecting decision on appeal or error, 111 A.L.R. 1317; 151 A.L.R. 987.    Judgment or order dismissing action as against one defendant as subject of appeal or error before disposition of case as against codefendant, 114 A.L.R. 759.    Reception of incompetent evidence in criminal case tried to court without jury as ground of reversal, 116 A.L.R. 558.    First decision of intermediate court as law of case on appeal to court of last resort from subsequent decision, 118 A.L.R. 1286.    Remedy of one convicted of crime while insane, 121 A.L.R. 267.    Res judicata as regards decisions or awards under workmen's compensation acts, 122 A.L.R. 550.    Ruling against defendant's attack upon indictment or information as subject to review by higher court, before trial, 133 A.L.R. 934.    Application for or acceptance of executive clemency as affecting appellate proceedings or motion for new trial, 138 A.L.R. 1162.    Adequacy of remedy by appeal in criminal cases to preclude prohibition sought on the ground of lack or loss of jurisdiction, 141 A.L.R. 1262.    Finality, for purposes of appeal, of judgment in federal court which disposes of plaintiff's claim, but not of defendant's counterclaim, or vice versa, 147 A.L.R. 583.    Order upon application for suppression in criminal case of evidence wrongly seized by government as appealable, 156 A.L.R. 1207.    Effect of, and remedies for, exclusion of eligible class of persons from jury list in civil case, 166 A.L.R. 1422.    Order granting or denying revival of action after death of party as final order subject to appeal, 167 A.L.R. 261.    Order granting or refusing motion for temporary alimony or suit money in divorce action as appealable, 167 A.L.R. 360.    Appealability of ruling or demurrer to plea, answer, or reply, 171 A.L.R. 1433.   Appealability of order entered on motion to strike pleading, 1 A.L.R.2d 422.   Finality of judgment or decree for purposes of review as affected by provision for future accounting, 3 A.L.R.2d 342.   Questions or legal theories affecting trust estates as subject to consideration on appeal though not raised below, 11 A.L.R.2d 317.   Appealability of order granting or denying right of intervention, 15 A.L.R.2d 336.   Appealability of order with respect to motion for joinder of additional parties, 16 A.L.R.2d 1023.   Appealability of federal district court order denying motion to remand cause to state court, 21 A.L.R.2d 760.   Decree granting or refusing injunction as res judicata in action for damages in relation to matter concerning which injunction was asked in first suit, 26 A.L.R.2d 446.   Appealability of order overruling or sustaining motion to quash or set aside service of process, 30 A.L.R.2d 287.   What constitutes final judgment within provision or rule limiting application for new trial to specified period thereafter, 34 A.L.R.2d 1181.   Appealability of order pertaining to pretrial examination, discovery, interrogatories, production of books and papers, or the like, 37 A.L.R.2d 586.   Right of appeal from order on application for removal of personal representative, guardian, or trustee, 37 A.L.R.2d 751.   Judicial relief other than by dissolution or receivership in cases of intracorporate deadlock, 47 A.L.R.2d 365.   Appealability of order denying motion for directed verdict or for judgment notwithstanding the verdict where movant has been granted a new trial, 57 A.L.R.2d 1198.   Ruling on motion to quash execution as ground of appeal or writ of error, 59 A.L.R.2d 692.   Contact or communication between juror and outsider during trial of civil case as ground for mistrial, new trial, or reversal, 64 A.L.R.2d 158.   Participation in, acceptance of, or submission to new trial as precluding appellate review of order granting it or of issue determined in first trial, 67 A.L.R.2d 191.   Appealability of order appointing, or refusing to appoint, receiver, 72 A.L.R.2d 1009.   Appealability of order vacating, or refusing to vacate, approval of settlement of infant's tort claim, 77 A.L.R.2d 801.   Appealability of order relating to forfeiture of bail, 78 A.L.R.2d 1180.   Appealability of order relating to transfer, on jurisdictional grounds, of cause from one state court to another, 78 A.L.R.2d 1204.   Reviewability, on appeal from final judgment, of interlocutory order, as affected by fact that order was separately appealable, 79 A.L.R.2d 1352.   Retroactive effect on appeal from judgment previously entered of statute shortening time allowed for appellate review, 81 A.L.R.2d 417.   Inattention of juror from sleepiness or other cause as ground for reversal or new trial, 88 A.L.R.2d 1275, 59 A.L.R.5th 1.   Appealability of order entered in connection with pretrial conference, 95 A.L.R.2d 1361.   Appealability of order arresting judgment in criminal case, 98 A.L.R.2d 737.   Judgment subject to appeal as entitled to full faith and credit, 2 A.L.R.3d 1384.   Appealability of order setting aside, or refusing to set aside, default judgment, 8 A.L.R.3d 1272.   Appealability of order directing payment of money into court, 15 A.L.R.3d 568.   Reviewability of order denying motion for summary judgment, 15 A.L.R.3d 899.   Appealability of orders or rulings, prior to final judgment in criminal case, as to accused's mental competency, 16 A.L.R.3d 714.   Appealability of order staying, or refusing to stay, action because of pendency of another action, 18 A.L.R.3d 400.   Appealability of order granting, extending, or refusing to dissolve temporary restraining order, 19 A.L.R.3d 403.   Appealability of order refusing to grant or dissolving temporary restraining order, 19 A.L.R.3d 459.   Appealability of acquittal from or dismissal of charge of contempt of court, 24 A.L.R.3d 650.   Appealability of contempt adjudication or conviction, 33 A.L.R.3d 448.   Development, since Hickman v. Taylor, of attorney's "work product" doctrine, 35 A.L.R.3d 412; 27 A.L.R.4th 568.   Appealability of order denying right to proceed in form of class action - state cases, 54 A.L.R.3d 595.   Appealability of state court order granting or denying consolidation, severance, or separate trials, 77 A.L.R.3d 1082.   Appealability of order dismissing counterclaim, 86 A.L.R.3d 944.   Defendant's appeal from plea conviction as affected by prosecutor's failure or refusal to dismiss other pending charges, pursuant to plea agreement, until expiration of time for appeal, 86 A.L.R.3d 1262.   Appealability of state court's order granting or denying motion to disqualify attorney, 5 A.L.R.4th 1251.   Right of municipal corporation to review of unfavorable decision in action or prosecution for violation of ordinance - modern status, 11 A.L.R.4th 399.   Relief other than by dissolution in cases of intracorporate deadlock or dissension, 34 A.L.R.4th 13.   Appealability of order suspending imposition or execution of sentence, 51 A.L.R.4th 939.   Appealability of interlocutory or pendente lite order for temporary child custody, 82 A.L.R.5th 389.