CO Code § 4-9-310 (2021)
2021 Colorado Code|Title 4 - Uniform Commercial Code|Article 9 - Secured Transactions|Part 3 - Perfection and Priority|§ 4-9-310. When Filing Required to Perfect Security Interest or Agricultural Lien - Security Interests and Agricultural Liens to Which Filing Provisions Do Not Apply

  Except as otherwise provided in subsection (b) of this section and section 4-9-312 (b), a financing statement must be filed to perfect all security interests and agricultural liens.    The filing of a financing statement is not necessary to perfect a security interest:   That is perfected under section 4-9-308 (d), (e), (f), or (g);    That is perfected under section 4-9-309 when it attaches;    In property subject to a statute, regulation, or treaty described in section 4-9-311 (a);    In goods in possession of a bailee which is perfected under section 4-9-312 (d)(1) or (2);    In certificated securities, documents, goods, or instruments that is perfected without filing, control, or possession under section 4-9-312 (e), (f), or (g);    In collateral in the secured party's possession under section 4-9-313;    In a certificated security which is perfected by delivery of the security certificate to the secured party under section 4-9-313;    In deposit accounts, electronic chattel paper, electronic documents, investment property, or letter-of-credit rights that is perfected by control under section 4-9-314;    In proceeds which is perfected under section 4-9-315; or    That is perfected under section 4-9-316.       If a secured party assigns a perfected security interest or agricultural lien, a filing under this article is not required to continue the perfected status of the security interest against creditors of and transferees from the original debtor.     History. Source: L. 2001: Entire article R&RE, p. 1348, § 1, effective July 1. L. 2006: (b)(5) and (b)(8) amended, p. 501, § 38, effective September 1.    Editor's note:   This section is similar to former § 4-9-302 as it existed prior to 2001.   OFFICIAL COMMENT   1. Source. Former Section 9-302(1), (2).   2. General Rule. Subsection (a) establishes a central Article 9 principle: Filing a financing statement is necessary for perfection of security interests and agricultural liens. However, filing is not necessary to perfect a security interest that is perfected by another permissible method, see subsection (b), nor does filing ordinarily perfect a security interest in a deposit account, letter-of-credit right, or money. See Section 9-312(b). Part 5 of the Article deals with the office in which to file, mechanics of filing, and operations of the filing office.   3. Exemptions from Filing. Subsection (b) lists the security interests for which filing is not required as a condition of perfection, because they are perfected automatically upon attachment (subsections (b)(2) and (b)(9)) or upon the occurrence of another event (subsections (b)(1), (b)(5), and (b)(9)), because they are perfected under the law of another jurisdiction (subsection (b)(10)), or because they are perfected by another method, such as by the secured party's taking possession or control (subsections (b)(3), (b)(4), (b)(5), (b)(6), (b)(7), and (b)(8)).   4. Assignments of Perfected Security Interests. Subsection (c) concerns assignment of a perfected security interest or agricultural lien. It provides that no filing is necessary in connection with an assignment by a secured party to an assignee in order to maintain perfection as against creditors of and transferees from the original debtor.   Example 1: Buyer buys goods from Seller, who retains a security interest in them. After Seller perfects the security interest by filing, Seller assigns the perfected security interest to X. The security interest, in X's hands and without further steps on X's part, continues perfected against Buyer's transferees and creditors.   Example 2: Dealer creates a security interest in specific equipment in favor of Lender. After Lender perfects the security interest in the equipment by filing, Lender assigns the chattel paper (which includes the perfected security interest in Dealer's equipment) to X. The security interest in the equipment, in X's hands and without further steps on X's part, continues perfected against Dealer's transferees and creditors. However, regardless of whether Lender made the assignment to secure Lender's obligation to X or whether the assignment was an outright sale of the chattel paper, the assignment creates a security interest in the chattel paper in favor of X. Accordingly, X must take whatever steps may be required for perfection in order to be protected against Lender's transferees and creditors with respect to the chattel paper.   Subsection (c) applies not only to an assignment of a security interest perfected by filing but also to an assignment of a security interest perfected by a method other than by filing, such as by control or by possession. Although subsection (c) addresses explicitly only the absence of an additional filing requirement, the same result normally will follow in the case of an assignment of a security interest perfected by a method other than by filing. For example, as long as possession of collateral is maintained by an assignee or by the assignor or another person on behalf of the assignee, no further perfection steps need be taken on account of the assignment to continue perfection as against creditors and transferees of the original debtor. Of course, additional action may be required for perfection of the assignee's interest as against creditors and transferees of theassignor.   Similarly, subsection (c) applies to the assignment of a security interest perfected by compliance with a statute, regulation, or treaty under Section 9-311(b), such as a certificate-of-title statute. Unless the statute expressly provides to the contrary, the security interest will remain perfected against creditors of and transferees from the original debtor, even if the assignee takes no action to cause the certificate of title to reflect the assignment or to cause its name to appear on the certificate of title. See PEB Commentary No. 12, which discusses this issue under former Section 9-302(3). Compliance with the statute is “equivalent to filing” under Section 9-311(b).   ANNOTATION   Law reviews. For article, “The Revolution in Consumer Credit Legislation”, see 45 Den. L.J. 679 . For comment on In re Lehner appearing below, see 48 Den. L.J. 146 (1971). For article, "Buyer-Secured Party Conflicts Under Section 9-307(1) of the Uniform Commercial Code", see 46 U. Colo. L. Rev. 333 (1974-75). For article, “Secured Transactions — Part I: Attachment, Perfection and Priorities”, see 11 Colo. Law. 2939 (1982).   Annotator's note. Since § 4-9-310 is similar to § 4-9-302 as it existed prior to the 2001 repeal and reenactment of this article, relevant cases construing that provision have been included in the annotations to this section.   A financing statement must be filed to perfect all security interests, with some exceptions. In re Lehner, 303 F. Supp. 317 (D. Colo. 1969 ), aff'd per curiam and reh'g denied, 427 F.2d 357 (10th Cir. 1970).   Assignment of proceeds to be paid in condemnation proceeding is not perfected lien, entitled to priority, until a financing statement is filled pursuant to this section. Bd. of County Comm'rs v. Berkeley Vill., 40 Colo. App. 431, 580 P.2d 1251 (1978).   Because priority of perfected security interest in crops depends upon date of its filing, it will normally have priority under “first in time” rule over creditor's “rents and profits” clause in a deed of trust because there priority is determined by time of application for receivership. Application of Nw. Mut. Life Ins. Co., 703 P.2d 1314 (Colo. App. 1985).   Such as logging equipment. For security interests in logging equipment to be perfected, a financing statement must be properly filed. Mtn. Credit v. Michiana Lumber & Supply, Inc., 31 Colo. App. 112, 498 P.2d 967 (1972).   A security interest in general intangibles, including the settlement of a lawsuit, is perfected by filing a financing statement as provided by law, which gives the holder of the perfected security interest a superior interest as creditor in the settlement proceeds over a judgment creditor who becomes a lien creditor only when the writ of garnishment is served on the debtor. Bowlen v. Fed. Deposit Ins. Corp., 815 P.2d 1013 (Colo. App. 1991).   Applied in Welbourne Dev. Co. v. Affiliated Clearance Corp., 28 Colo. App. 313, 472 P.2d 684 (1970); Young v. Golden State Bank, 39 Colo. App. 45, 560 P.2d 855 (1977); Yeager Trucking v. Circle Leasing, 29 B.R. 131 (Bankr. D. Colo. 1983 ).