reglab/housing_qa huggingface dataset:
WA Rev Code § 10.116.040 (2021)
2021 Revised Code of Washington|Title 10 - Criminal Procedure|Chapter 10.116 - Peace Officers—Tactics and Equipment.|10.116.040 - Military equipment.

RCW 10.116.040 Military equipment.(1) A law enforcement agency may not acquire or use any military equipment. Any law enforcement agency in possession of military equipment as of July 25, 2021, shall return the equipment to the federal agency from which it was acquired, if applicable, or destroy the equipment by December 31, 2022.(2)(a) Each law enforcement agency shall compile an inventory of military equipment possessed by the agency, including the proposed use of the equipment, estimated number of times the equipment has been used in the prior year, and whether such use is necessary for the operation and safety of the agency or some other public safety purpose. The agency shall provide the inventory to the Washington association of sheriffs and police chiefs no later than November 1, 2021.(b) The Washington association of sheriffs and police chiefs shall summarize the inventory information from each law enforcement agency and provide a report to the governor and the appropriate committees of the legislature no later than December 31, 2021.(3) For the purposes of this section:(a) "Military equipment" means firearms and ammunition of .50 caliber or greater, machine guns, armed helicopters, armed or armored drones, armed vessels, armed vehicles, armed aircraft, tanks, long range acoustic hailing devices, rockets, rocket launchers, bayonets, grenades, missiles, directed energy systems, and electromagnetic spectrum weapons.(b) "Grenade" refers to any explosive grenade designed to injure or kill subjects, such as a fragmentation grenade or antitank grenade, or any incendiary grenade designed to produce intense heat or fire. "Grenade" does not include other nonexplosive grenades designed to temporarily incapacitate or disorient subjects without causing permanent injury, such as a stun grenade, sting grenade, smoke grenade, tear gas grenade, or blast ball.(4) This section does not prohibit a law enforcement agency from participating in a federal military equipment surplus program, provided that any equipment acquired through the program does not constitute military equipment. This may include, for example: Medical supplies; hospital and health care equipment; office supplies, furniture, and equipment; school supplies; warehousing equipment; unarmed vehicles and vessels; conducted energy weapons; public address systems; scientific equipment; and protective gear and weather gear.[ 2021 c 320 § 5.]
WA Rev Code § 10.116.050 (2021)
2021 Revised Code of Washington|Title 10 - Criminal Procedure|Chapter 10.116 - Peace Officers—Tactics and Equipment.|10.116.050 - Peace officers—Reasonably identifiable.

RCW 10.116.050 Peace officers—Reasonably identifiable.All law enforcement agencies shall adopt policies and procedures to ensure that uniformed peace officers while on duty and in the performance of their official duties are reasonably identifiable. For purposes of this section, "reasonably identifiable" means that the peace officer's uniform clearly displays the officer's name or other information that members of the public can see and the agency can use to identify the peace officer.[ 2021 c 320 § 6.]
WA Rev Code § 10.118.010 (2021)
2021 Revised Code of Washington|Title 10 - Criminal Procedure|Chapter 10.118 - Law Enforcement—Use of Force—Data Collection.|10.118.010 - Findings.

RCW 10.118.010 Findings.The legislature finds that law enforcement transparency and accountability are vital in maintaining public trust. Data collection is one essential tool to allow the public, law enforcement, and policymakers to analyze the effectiveness of existing police practices, determine which policies and training work and do not work, and avoid unintended consequences by supporting policy decisions with clear and relevant data.The legislature finds that creating a statewide data collection program that creates a publicly accessible database to track metrics will help to promote openness, transparency, and accountability, build stronger police-community relations, improve trust and confidence in policing services, evaluate specific areas of concern such as biased policing and excessive force, and ultimately improve the quality of policing services.[ 2021 c 326 § 1.]
WA Rev Code § 10.118.020 (2021)
2021 Revised Code of Washington|Title 10 - Criminal Procedure|Chapter 10.118 - Law Enforcement—Use of Force—Data Collection.|10.118.020 - Definitions.

RCW 10.118.020 Definitions.The definitions in this section apply throughout this chapter unless the context clearly requires otherwise.(1) "Contractor" means the institution of higher education contracted with the office of the attorney general to implement the statewide use of force data program as provided in this chapter.(2) "Great bodily harm" has the same meaning as in RCW 9A.04.110.(3) "Institution of higher education" has the same meaning as in RCW 28B.92.030.(4) "Law enforcement agency" or "agency" means any general authority Washington law enforcement agency and limited authority Washington law enforcement agency as those terms are defined in RCW 10.93.020.(5) "Substantial bodily harm" has the same meaning as in RCW 9A.04.110.[ 2021 c 326 § 2.]
WA Rev Code § 10.118.040 (2021)
2021 Revised Code of Washington|Title 10 - Criminal Procedure|Chapter 10.118 - Law Enforcement—Use of Force—Data Collection.|10.118.040 - Competitive procurement.

RCW 10.118.040 Competitive procurement.(1) Subject to the availability of amounts appropriated for this specific purpose, the office of the attorney general must engage in a competitive procurement to contract with an institution of higher education to implement the statewide use of force data program. The primary purpose of the contract is to develop a system for law enforcement agencies to report, collect, and publish the use of force data reports required in RCW 10.118.030.(2) The request for proposal or other procurement method should encourage collaboration with other public and private institutions, businesses, and organizations with significant expertise and experience in collecting, tracking, and reporting data on law enforcement interactions with the public.(3) Members and representatives of entities participating in the advisory group established in section 3, chapter 326, Laws of 2021 may not participate or bid in the competitive procurement.(4) The advisory group, or designated members of the group, may participate in the procurement process through the development of the request for proposal and the review and evaluation of responsive bidders.(5) The contract must require the successful bidder to provide appropriate training to its staff and subcontractor staff, including training on racial equity issues.[ 2021 c 326 § 5.]
WA Rev Code § 10.120.010 (2021)
2021 Revised Code of Washington|Title 10 - Criminal Procedure|Chapter 10.120 - Law Enforcement and Correctional Officers—Permissible Uses of Force.|10.120.010 - Definitions.

RCW 10.120.010 Definitions.The definitions in this section apply throughout this chapter unless the context clearly requires otherwise.(1) "Law enforcement agency" includes any "general authority Washington law enforcement agency" and any "limited authority Washington law enforcement agency" as those terms are defined in RCW 10.93.020.(2) "Less lethal alternatives" include, but are not limited to, verbal warnings, de-escalation tactics, conducted energy weapons, devices that deploy oleoresin capsicum, batons, and beanbag rounds.(3) "Peace officer" includes any "general authority Washington peace officer," "limited authority Washington peace officer," and "specially commissioned Washington peace officer" as those terms are defined in RCW 10.93.020; however, "peace officer" does not include any corrections officer or other employee of a jail, correctional, or detention facility, but does include any community corrections officer.[ 2021 c 324 § 2.]NOTES:Intent—2021 c 324: "The legislature recognizes that additional clarity is necessary following the passage of Initiative Measure No. 940 (chapter 1, Laws of 2019) and Substitute House Bill No. 1064 (chapter 4, Laws of 2019). The legislature intends to address excessive force and discriminatory policing by establishing a requirement for law enforcement and community corrections officers to act with reasonable care when carrying out their duties, including using de-escalation tactics and alternatives to deadly force. Further, the legislature intends to address public safety concerns by limiting the use of deadly force to very narrow circumstances where there is an imminent threat of serious physical injury or death. It is the intent of the legislature that when practicable, peace officers will use the least amount of physical force necessary to overcome actual resistance under the circumstances.It is the fundamental duty of law enforcement to preserve and protect all human life." [ 2021 c 324 § 1.]
WA Rev Code § 10.120.030 (2021)
2021 Revised Code of Washington|Title 10 - Criminal Procedure|Chapter 10.120 - Law Enforcement and Correctional Officers—Permissible Uses of Force.|10.120.030 - Policies for use of force and de-escalation tactics.

RCW 10.120.030 Policies for use of force and de-escalation tactics.(1) By July 1, 2022, the attorney general shall develop and publish model policies on law enforcement's use of force and de-escalation tactics consistent with RCW 10.120.020.(2) By December 1, 2022, all law enforcement agencies shall: Adopt policies consistent with the model policies and submit copies of the applicable policies to the attorney general; or, if the agency did not adopt policies consistent with the model policies, provide notice to the attorney general stating the reasons for any departures from the model policies and an explanation of how the agency's policies are consistent with RCW 10.120.020, including a copy of the agency's relevant policies. After December 1, 2022, whenever a law enforcement agency modifies or repeals any policies pertaining to the use of force or de-escalation tactics, the agency shall submit notice of such action with copies of any relevant policies to the attorney general within 60 days.(3) By December 31st of each year, the attorney general shall publish on its website a report on the requirements of this section, including copies of the model policies, information as to the status of individual agencies' policies, and copies of any agency policies departing from the model policies.[ 2021 c 324 § 4.]NOTES:Intent—2021 c 324: See note following RCW 10.120.010.
WA Rev Code § 10.122.010 (2021)
2021 Revised Code of Washington|Title 10 - Criminal Procedure|Chapter 10.122 - Uniform Electronic Recordation of Custodial Interrogations Act.|10.122.010 - Short title.

RCW 10.122.010 Short title. (Effective January 1, 2022.)This chapter may be known and cited as the uniform electronic recordation of custodial interrogations act.[ 2021 c 329 § 1.]
WA Rev Code § 10.122.020 (2021)
2021 Revised Code of Washington|Title 10 - Criminal Procedure|Chapter 10.122 - Uniform Electronic Recordation of Custodial Interrogations Act.|10.122.020 - Definitions.

RCW 10.122.020 Definitions. (Effective January 1, 2022.)In this chapter:(1) "Custodial interrogation" means express questioning or other actions or words by a law enforcement officer which are reasonably likely to elicit an incriminating response from an individual and occurs when reasonable individuals in the same circumstances would consider themselves in custody.(2) "Electronic recording" means an audio recording or audio and video recording that accurately records a custodial interrogation. "Record electronically" and "recorded electronically" have a corresponding meaning.(3) "Law enforcement agency" means a general authority Washington law enforcement agency or limited authority Washington law enforcement agency as those terms are defined in RCW 10.93.020.(4) "Law enforcement officer" means a general authority Washington peace officer or limited authority Washington peace officer as those terms are defined in RCW 10.93.020.(5) "Person" means an individual, corporation, business trust, statutory trust, estate, trust, partnership, limited liability company, association, joint venture, public corporation, or government; governmental subdivision, agency, or instrumentality; or any other legal or commercial entity.(6) "Place of detention" means a fixed location under the control of a law enforcement agency where individuals are questioned about alleged crimes or status offenses. The term includes a jail, police or sheriff's station, holding cell, correctional or detention facility, police vehicle, and[,] in the case of juveniles, schools.(7) "State" means a state of the United States, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, the United States Virgin Islands, or any territory or insular possession subject to the jurisdiction of the United States.(8) "Statement" means a communication whether oral, written, electronic, or nonverbal.[ 2021 c 329 § 2.]
WA Rev Code § 10.122.030 (2021)
2021 Revised Code of Washington|Title 10 - Criminal Procedure|Chapter 10.122 - Uniform Electronic Recordation of Custodial Interrogations Act.|10.122.030 - Electronic recording requirement.

RCW 10.122.030 Electronic recording requirement. (Effective January 1, 2022.)(1) Except as otherwise provided by RCW 10.122.050 through 10.122.100, a custodial interrogation, including the giving of any required warning, advice of the rights of the individual being questioned, and the waiver of any rights by the individual, must be recorded electronically in its entirety if the interrogation subject is a juvenile or if the interrogation relates to a felony crime. A custodial interrogation at a jail, police or sheriff's station, holding cell, or correctional or detention facility must be recorded by audio and video means. A custodial interrogation at any other place of detention must be recorded by audio means at minimum.(2) If a law enforcement officer conducts a custodial interrogation to which subsection (1) of this section applies without electronically recording it in its entirety, the officer shall prepare a written or electronic report explaining the reason for not complying with this section and summarizing the custodial interrogation process and the individual's statements.(3) A law enforcement officer shall prepare the report required by subsection (2) of this section as soon as practicable after completing the interrogation.(4) As soon as practicable, a law enforcement officer conducting a custodial interrogation outside a place of detention shall prepare a written or electronic report explaining the decision to interrogate outside a place of detention and summarizing the custodial interrogation process and the individual's statements made outside a place of detention.(5) This section does not apply to a spontaneous statement made outside the course of a custodial interrogation or a statement made in response to a question asked routinely during the processing of the arrest of an individual.[ 2021 c 329 § 3.]
WA Rev Code § 10.122.040 (2021)
2021 Revised Code of Washington|Title 10 - Criminal Procedure|Chapter 10.122 - Uniform Electronic Recordation of Custodial Interrogations Act.|10.122.040 - Consent not required—Notice.

RCW 10.122.040 Consent not required—Notice. (Effective January 1, 2022.)Notwithstanding RCW 9.73.030 and 9.73.090, a law enforcement officer conducting a custodial interrogation is not required to obtain consent to electronic recording from the individual being interrogated, but must inform the individual that an electronic recording is being made of the interrogation. This chapter does not permit a law enforcement officer or a law enforcement agency to record a private communication between an individual and the individual's lawyer.[ 2021 c 329 § 4.]
WA Rev Code § 10.122.050 (2021)
2021 Revised Code of Washington|Title 10 - Criminal Procedure|Chapter 10.122 - Uniform Electronic Recordation of Custodial Interrogations Act.|10.122.050 - Exception for exigent circumstances.

RCW 10.122.050 Exception for exigent circumstances. (Effective January 1, 2022.)A custodial interrogation to which RCW 10.122.030 otherwise applies need not be recorded electronically if recording is not feasible because of exigent circumstances. The law enforcement officer conducting the interrogation shall record electronically an explanation of the exigent circumstances before conducting the interrogation, if feasible, or as soon as practicable after the interrogation is completed.[ 2021 c 329 § 5.]
WA Rev Code § 10.122.060 (2021)
2021 Revised Code of Washington|Title 10 - Criminal Procedure|Chapter 10.122 - Uniform Electronic Recordation of Custodial Interrogations Act.|10.122.060 - Exception for individual's refusal to be recorded electronically.

RCW 10.122.060 Exception for individual's refusal to be recorded electronically. (Effective January 1, 2022.)(1) A custodial interrogation to which RCW 10.122.030 otherwise applies need not be recorded electronically if the individual to be interrogated indicates that the individual will not participate in the interrogation if it is recorded electronically. If feasible, the agreement to participate without recording must be recorded electronically.(2) If, during a custodial interrogation to which RCW 10.122.030 otherwise applies, the individual being interrogated indicates that the individual will not participate in further interrogation unless electronic recording ceases, the remainder of the custodial interrogation need not be recorded electronically. If feasible, the individual's agreement to participate without further recording must be recorded electronically.(3) A law enforcement officer, with intent to avoid the requirement of electronic recording in RCW 10.122.030, may not encourage an individual to request that a recording not be made.[ 2021 c 329 § 6.]
WA Rev Code § 10.122.070 (2021)
2021 Revised Code of Washington|Title 10 - Criminal Procedure|Chapter 10.122 - Uniform Electronic Recordation of Custodial Interrogations Act.|10.122.070 - Exception for interrogation conducted by other jurisdiction.

RCW 10.122.070 Exception for interrogation conducted by other jurisdiction. (Effective January 1, 2022.)If a custodial interrogation occurs in another state in compliance with that state's law or is conducted by a federal law enforcement agency in compliance with federal law, the interrogation need not be recorded electronically unless the interrogation is conducted with intent to avoid the requirement of electronic recording in RCW 10.122.030.[ 2021 c 329 § 7.]
WA Rev Code § 10.122.080 (2021)
2021 Revised Code of Washington|Title 10 - Criminal Procedure|Chapter 10.122 - Uniform Electronic Recordation of Custodial Interrogations Act.|10.122.080 - Exception based on belief recording not required.

RCW 10.122.080 Exception based on belief recording not required. (Effective January 1, 2022.)(1) A custodial interrogation to which RCW 10.122.030 otherwise applies need not be recorded electronically if the interrogation occurs when no law enforcement officer conducting the interrogation has knowledge of facts and circumstances that would lead an officer reasonably to believe that the individual being interrogated may have committed an act for which RCW 10.122.030 requires that a custodial interrogation be recorded electronically.(2) If, during a custodial interrogation under subsection (1) of this section, the individual being interrogated reveals facts and circumstances giving a law enforcement officer conducting the interrogation reason to believe that an act has been committed for which RCW 10.122.030 requires that a custodial interrogation be recorded electronically, continued custodial interrogation concerning that act must be recorded electronically, if feasible.[ 2021 c 329 § 8.]
WA Rev Code § 10.122.090 (2021)
2021 Revised Code of Washington|Title 10 - Criminal Procedure|Chapter 10.122 - Uniform Electronic Recordation of Custodial Interrogations Act.|10.122.090 - Exception for safety of individual or protection of identity.

RCW 10.122.090 Exception for safety of individual or protection of identity. (Effective January 1, 2022.)A custodial interrogation to which RCW 10.122.030 otherwise applies need not be recorded electronically if a law enforcement officer conducting the interrogation or the officer's superior reasonably believes that electronic recording would disclose the identity of a confidential informant or jeopardize the safety of an officer, the individual being interrogated, or another individual. If feasible and consistent with the safety of a confidential informant, an explanation of the basis for the belief that electronic recording would disclose the informant's identity must be recorded electronically at the time of the interrogation. If contemporaneous recording of the basis for the belief is not feasible, the recording must be made as soon as practicable after the interrogation is completed.[ 2021 c 329 § 9.]
WA Rev Code § 10.122.100 (2021)
2021 Revised Code of Washington|Title 10 - Criminal Procedure|Chapter 10.122 - Uniform Electronic Recordation of Custodial Interrogations Act.|10.122.100 - Exception for equipment malfunction.

RCW 10.122.100 Exception for equipment malfunction. (Effective January 1, 2022.)(1) All or part of a custodial interrogation to which RCW 10.122.030 otherwise applies need not be recorded electronically to the extent that recording is not feasible because the available electronic recording equipment fails, despite reasonable maintenance of the equipment, and timely repair or replacement is not feasible.(2) If both audio and video recording of a custodial interrogation are otherwise required by RCW 10.122.030, recording may be by audio alone if a technical problem in the video recording equipment prevents video recording, despite reasonable maintenance of the equipment, and timely repair or replacement is not feasible.(3) If both audio and video recording of a custodial interrogation are otherwise required by RCW 10.122.030, recording may be by video alone if a technical problem in the audio recording equipment prevents audio recording, despite reasonable maintenance of the equipment, and timely repair or replacement is not feasible.[ 2021 c 329 § 10.]
WA Rev Code § 10.122.110 (2021)
2021 Revised Code of Washington|Title 10 - Criminal Procedure|Chapter 10.122 - Uniform Electronic Recordation of Custodial Interrogations Act.|10.122.110 - Burden of persuasion.

RCW 10.122.110 Burden of persuasion. (Effective January 1, 2022.)If the prosecution relies on an exception in RCW 10.122.050 through 10.122.100 to justify a failure to record electronically a custodial interrogation, the prosecution must prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the exception applies.[ 2021 c 329 § 11.]
WA Rev Code § 10.122.120 (2021)
2021 Revised Code of Washington|Title 10 - Criminal Procedure|Chapter 10.122 - Uniform Electronic Recordation of Custodial Interrogations Act.|10.122.120 - Notice of intent to introduce unrecorded statement.

RCW 10.122.120 Notice of intent to introduce unrecorded statement. (Effective January 1, 2022.)If the prosecution intends to introduce in its case in chief a statement made during a custodial interrogation to which RCW 10.122.030 applies which was not recorded electronically, the prosecution, not later than the time specified by the local rules governing discovery, shall serve the defendant with written notice of that intent and of any exception on which the prosecution intends to rely.[ 2021 c 329 § 12.]