CO Code § 15-2.5-311 (2021)
2021 Colorado Code|Title 15 - Probate, Trusts, and Fiduciaries|Article 2.5 - Uniform Powers of Appointment Act|Part 3 - Exercise of Power of Appointment|§ 15-2.5-311. Disposition of Unappointed Property Under Released or Unexercised Nongeneral Power

  To the extent a powerholder releases, ineffectively exercises, or fails to exercise a nongeneral power of appointment:   The gift-in-default clause controls the disposition of the unappointed property; or    If there is no gift-in-default clause, or to the extent the clause is ineffective, the unappointed property:   Passes to the permissible appointees if:   The permissible appointees are defined and limited; and    The terms of the instrument creating the power do not manifest a contrary intent; or       If there is no taker under subparagraph (I) of this paragraph (b), passes under a reversionary interest to the donor or the donor's transferee or successor in interest.           History. Source: L. 2014: Entire article added,(HB 14-1353), ch. 209, p. 779, § 1, effective July 1, 2015.    OFFICIAL COMMENT   To the extent the powerholder of a nongeneral power releases, ineffectively exercises, or fails to exercise the power, thus causing the power to lapse, the gift-in- default clause controls the disposition of the unappointed property to the extent the gift- in-default clause is effective.   To the extent the gift-in-default clause is nonexistent or ineffective, the unappointed property passes to the permissible appointees of the power--including those who are substituted for permissible appointees under an antilapse statute (see Section 306)--if the permissible appointees are “defined and limited” (on the meaning of this term of art, see the Comment to Section 205) and the donor has not manifested an intent that the permissible appointees shall receive the appointive property only so far as the powerholder elects to appoint it to them. This rule of construction is based on the assumption that the donor intends the permissible appointees of the power to have the benefit of the property. The donor focused on transmitting the appointive property to the permissible appointees through an appointment, but if the powerholder fails to carry out this particular method of transfer, the donor's underlying intent to pass the appointive property to the defined and limited class of permissible appointees should be carried out. Subsection (1)(b)(I) effectuates the donor's underlying intent by implying a gift in default of appointment to the defined and limited class of permissible appointees.   If the defined and limited class of permissible appointees is a multigenerational class, such as “descendants,” “issue,” “heirs,” or “relatives,” the default rule of construction is that they take by representation. See Restatement Third of Property: Wills and Other Donative Transfers § 14.3, Comment b. If the defined and limited class is a single-generation class, the default rule of construction is that the eligible class members take equally. See Restatement Third of Property: Wills and Other Donative Transfers § 14.2.   No implied gift in default of appointment to the permissible appointees arises if the permissible appointees are identified in such broad and inclusive terms that they are not defined and limited. In such an event, the donor has no underlying intent to pass the appointive property to such permissible appointees. Similarly, if the donor manifests an intent that the defined and limited class of permissible appointees is to receive the appointive property only by appointment, the donor's manifestation of intent eliminates any implied gift in default to the permissible appointees. Subsection (1)(b)(II) responds to these possibilities by providing for a reversionary interest to the donor or the donor's transferee or successor in interest.   The rules are illustrated by the following examples.   D died, leaving a will devising property to T in trust. T is directed to pay the income to S (D's son) for life, and then to pay the principal “to such of S's descendants who survive S as S may appoint by will.” D's will contains no gift-in- default clause. S dies without exercising the nongeneral power. The permissible appointees of the power constitute a defined and limited class. Accordingly, the principal of the trust passes at S's death to S's descendants who survive S, by representation.  Example 1.  . Same facts as Example 1, except that the permissible appointees of S's power of appointment are “such one or more persons, other than S, S's estate, S's creditors, or creditors of S's estate.” The permissible appointees do not constitute a defined and limited class. Accordingly, the principal of the trust passes, at S's death, under a reversionary interest to D or D's transferee or successor in interest.  Example 2  The rules of this section are consistent with, and this Comment draws on, Restatement Third of Property: Wills and Other Donative Transfers § 19.23 and the accompanying Commentary.