reglab/housing_qa huggingface dataset:
MO Rev Stat § 542.271 (2021)
2021 Missouri Revised Statutes|Title XXXVII - Criminal Procedure|Chapter 542 - Proceedings to Preserve the Peace — Searches and Seizures|Section 542.271 - Warrant may issue to search and seize, certain persons and items, or to copy, photograph or record.

Effective - 28 Aug 1983   542.271. Warrant may issue to search and seize, certain persons and items, or to copy, photograph or record. — 1. A warrant may be issued to search for and seize, or photograph, copy or record any of the following:  (1) Property, article, material, or substance that constitutes evidence of the commission of a criminal offense; or  (2) Property which has been stolen or acquired in any other manner declared an offense by chapters 569 and 570; or  (3) Property owned by any person furnishing public communications services to the general public subject to the regulations of the public service commission if such person has failed to remove the property within a reasonable time after receipt of a written notice from a peace officer stating that such property is being used as an instrumentality in the commission of an offense; or   (4) Property for which possession is an offense under the law of this state; or  (5) Property for which seizure is authorized or directed by any statute of this state; or  (6) Property which has been used by the owner or used with his acquiescence or consent as a raw material or as an instrument to manufacture or produce any thing for which possession is an offense under the laws of this state.  2. A warrant may be issued to search for and rescue a kidnapped person.  3. A warrant may be issued to search for any person for whom a valid felony arrest warrant is outstanding.  4. A warrant may be issued to search for and seize any deceased human fetus or corpse, or part thereof.  5. The provisions of sections 542.261 to 542.296 and section 542.301 shall prevail over any rules and regulations promulgated by any state governmental agency, commission or board, to the contrary notwithstanding. ­­-------- (L. 1974 S.B. 366 § 3, A.L. 1980 H.B. 1528 Revision, A.L. 1983 S.B. 24)
MO Rev Stat § 542.286 (2021)
2021 Missouri Revised Statutes|Title XXXVII - Criminal Procedure|Chapter 542 - Proceedings to Preserve the Peace — Searches and Seizures|Section 542.286 - Warrant to be executed within territorial jurisdiction, exception.

Effective - 28 Aug 1974   542.286. Warrant to be executed within territorial jurisdiction, exception. — 1. A warrant to search a person or any movable thing may be executed in any part of the state where the person or thing is found if, subsequent to the filing of the application, the person or thing moves or is taken out of the territorial jurisdiction of the judge issuing the warrant.  2. All other search warrants shall be executed within the territorial jurisdiction of the court out of which the warrant issued and within the territorial jurisdiction of the officer executing the warrant. ­­-------- (L. 1974 S.B. 366 § 6)
MO Rev Stat § 542.291 (2021)
2021 Missouri Revised Statutes|Title XXXVII - Criminal Procedure|Chapter 542 - Proceedings to Preserve the Peace — Searches and Seizures|Section 542.291 - Search, when conducted — receipt for property taken.

Effective - 28 Aug 1989   542.291. Search, when conducted — receipt for property taken. — 1. The search shall be conducted in a reasonable manner. The search may be made at night if making it during the daytime is not practicable.  2. An officer making a search pursuant to an invalid warrant, the invalidity of which is not apparent on its face, may use such force as he would be justified in using if the warrant were valid.  3. The officer may summon as many persons as he deems necessary to assist him in executing the warrant. Such persons shall not be held liable as a result of the illegality of the search and seizure.  4. If any property is seized, the officer shall give to the person from whose possession it is taken, if he is present, a copy of the warrant and an itemized receipt of the property taken. If no person is present, the officer shall leave the copy and the receipt at the site of the search.  5. A copy of the itemized receipt of any property taken shall be delivered to the office of the prosecuting attorney in the county where the property was taken within two working days of the search. ­­-------- (L. 1974 S.B. 366 § 7, A.L. 1989 S.B. 215 & 58)
MO Rev Stat § 542.296 (2021)
2021 Missouri Revised Statutes|Title XXXVII - Criminal Procedure|Chapter 542 - Proceedings to Preserve the Peace — Searches and Seizures|Section 542.296 - Motion to suppress, grounds for.

Effective - 28 Aug 1974   542.296. Motion to suppress, grounds for. — 1. A person aggrieved by an unlawful seizure made by an officer and against whom there is a pending criminal proceeding growing out of the subject matter of the seizure may file a motion to suppress the use in evidence of the property or matter seized. For the purposes of this section, a pending criminal proceeding shall mean any criminal investigation being conducted with the intention of using the seized subject matter in seeking an indictment or information or when an information has been issued or an indictment returned.  2. The motion to suppress shall be in writing. It shall be filed with the court in which there is pending against the moving party a criminal proceeding growing out of the subject matter of the seizure.  3. The motion shall be made before the commencement of the trial of the moving party on the charge arising out of the seizure unless he was unaware of the grounds or had no opportunity to do so before the trial. In that event the motion may be made during the trial. However, the trial judge may in his discretion entertain a motion any time during trial.  4. Notice shall be given to the prosecuting attorney of the date, time, place and nature of the hearing.  5. The motion to suppress may be based upon any one or more of the following grounds:  (1) That the search and seizure were made without warrant and without lawful authority;  (2) That the warrant was improper upon its face or was illegally issued, including the issuance of a warrant without proper showing of probable cause;  (3) That the property seized was not that described in the warrant and that the officer was not otherwise lawfully privileged to seize the same;  (4) That the warrant was illegally executed by the officer;  (5) That in any other manner the search and seizure violated the rights of the movant under Section 15 of Article I of the Constitution of Missouri, or the fourth and fourteenth amendments of the Constitution of the United States.  6. The judge shall receive evidence on any issue of fact necessary to the decision of the motion. The burden of going forward with the evidence and the risk of nonpersuasion shall be upon the state to show by a preponderance of the evidence that the motion to suppress should be overruled.  7. If the motion is sustained, the judge shall order the property or matter delivered to the moving party, unless its retention is authorized or required by section 542.301, or by any other law of this state. ­­-------- (L. 1974 S.B. 366 § 8)
MO Rev Stat § 542.300 (2021)
2021 Missouri Revised Statutes|Title XXXVII - Criminal Procedure|Chapter 542 - Proceedings to Preserve the Peace — Searches and Seizures|Section 542.300 - Prisoners may be searched.

Effective - 28 Aug 1939   542.300. Prisoners may be searched. — Any associate circuit judge who shall commit any person charged with an offense to jail, or by whom any vagrant or disorderly person shall be committed, shall cause such person to be searched, for the purpose of discovering any money or property he may have, and if any be found, the same shall be taken into possession by the sheriff, and applied to the support of such person while in confinement, and to the payment of any costs which may be adjudged against him on account of the offense for which he is charged. ­­-------- (RSMo 1939 § 4163)  Prior revisions: 1929 § 3773; 1919 § 4119; 1909 § 5324  CROSS REFERENCE:  State highway patrol may take weapons from person arrested, 43.200
MO Rev Stat § 542.404 (2021)
2021 Missouri Revised Statutes|Title XXXVII - Criminal Procedure|Chapter 542 - Proceedings to Preserve the Peace — Searches and Seizures|Section 542.404 - Application for an order — authorization by attorney general — approval by judge, probable cause required.

Effective - 28 Aug 2002   542.404. Application for an order — authorization by attorney general — approval by judge, probable cause required. — 1. The elected prosecuting attorney of the county with the written authorization of the attorney general of the state of Missouri may make application for an order authorizing the interception of a wire communication. The supreme court of Missouri, upon notice that the attorney general of the state of Missouri has authorized application for an interception of a wire communication, shall appoint a circuit court from a circuit other than the circuit where the application originates to approve or deny the application and to issue any necessary orders. Such court may grant, in conformity with sections 542.400 to 542.422, an order authorizing the interception of wire communications by the law enforcement agency having responsibility for the investigation of the offense if there is probable cause to believe that the interception may provide evidence of a felony which involves the manufacture or distribution of a controlled substance, as the term is defined by section 195.016, or the felony of murder, arson, or kidnapping, or a terrorist threat as defined in section 574.115, or any conspiracy to commit any of the foregoing.  2. Any order entered pursuant to the provisions of sections 542.400 to 542.422 shall require live monitoring by appropriate law enforcement personnel of the interception of any wire communication. ­­-------- (L. 1989 H.B. 277, et al. § 3, A.L. 2002 S.B. 712)
MO Rev Stat § 542.406 (2021)
2021 Missouri Revised Statutes|Title XXXVII - Criminal Procedure|Chapter 542 - Proceedings to Preserve the Peace — Searches and Seizures|Section 542.406 - Disclosure of contents — privileged communications.

Effective - 28 Aug 2002   542.406. Disclosure of contents — privileged communications. — 1. Any investigative officer or law enforcement officer who, by any means authorized by sections 542.400 to 542.422, has lawfully obtained knowledge of the contents of any wire communication, or evidence derived therefrom, may disclose such contents to another investigative officer or law enforcement officer to the extent that such disclosure is necessary to the proper performance of the official duties of the officer making or receiving the disclosure for investigative purposes only.  2. Any investigative officer or law enforcement officer who, by any means authorized by sections 542.400 to 542.422, has lawfully obtained knowledge of the contents of any wire or oral communication, or evidence derived therefrom, may use such contents to the extent such use is necessary to the proper performance of his official duties.  3. Any person who has received, by any means authorized by sections 542.400 to 542.422, any information concerning a wire communication, or evidence derived therefrom, intercepted in accordance with the provisions of sections 542.400 to 542.422 shall disclose the contents of that communication or such derivative evidence while giving testimony under oath or affirmation in any criminal proceeding, including deposition in any court or in any grand jury proceeding, subject to the rules of evidence.  4. No otherwise privileged wire communication intercepted in accordance with, or in violation of, the provisions of sections 542.400 to 542.422 shall lose its privileged character and shall be suppressed upon motion. ­­-------- (L. 1989 H.B. 277, et al. § 4, A.L. 2002 S.B. 712)
MO Rev Stat § 542.412 (2021)
2021 Missouri Revised Statutes|Title XXXVII - Criminal Procedure|Chapter 542 - Proceedings to Preserve the Peace — Searches and Seizures|Section 542.412 - Contents may be used as evidence, when — disclosure of additional evidence to defendant.

Effective - 28 Aug 2002   542.412. Contents may be used as evidence, when — disclosure of additional evidence to defendant. — 1. The contents of any intercepted wire communications or evidence derived therefrom shall not be received in evidence or otherwise disclosed in any trial, hearing, or other proceeding in federal or state court nor in any administrative proceeding unless each party, in compliance with supreme court rules relating to discovery in criminal cases, hearings and proceedings, has been furnished with a copy of the court order and accompanying application under which the interception was authorized or approved and a transcript of any intercepted wire communication or evidence derived therefrom.  2. If the defense in its request designates material or information not in the possession or control of the state, but which is, in fact, in the possession or control of other governmental personnel, the state shall use diligence and make good faith efforts to cause such materials to be made available to the defendant's counsel, and if the state's efforts are unsuccessful and such material or other governmental personnel are subject to the jurisdiction of the court, the court, upon request, shall issue suitable subpoenas or orders to cause such material or information to be made available to the state for disclosure to the defense. ­­-------- (L. 1989 H.B. 277, et al. § 7, A.L. 2002 S.B. 712)
MO Rev Stat § 542.414 (2021)
2021 Missouri Revised Statutes|Title XXXVII - Criminal Procedure|Chapter 542 - Proceedings to Preserve the Peace — Searches and Seizures|Section 542.414 - Suppression of contents, grounds — right of state to appeal suppression motion, when.

Effective - 28 Aug 2002   542.414. Suppression of contents, grounds — right of state to appeal suppression motion, when. — 1. Any aggrieved person in any trial, hearing, or proceeding in or before any court, department, officer, agency, regulatory body, or other authority of the United States, the state, or a political subdivision thereof, may move to suppress the contents of any intercepted wire communication, or evidence derived therefrom, on the grounds that:  (1) The communication was unlawfully intercepted;  (2) The order of authorization or approval under which it was intercepted is insufficient on its face;  (3) The interception was not made in conformity with the order of authorization or approval; or  (4) The communication was intercepted in violation of the provisions of the Constitution of the United States or the state of Missouri or in violation of a state statute. ­­Such motion shall be made before the trial, hearing, or proceeding unless there was no reasonable opportunity to make such motion or the person was not aware of the existence of grounds for the motion. If the motion is granted, the contents of the intercepted wire communication, or evidence derived therefrom or the contents of any communication intercepted as a result of any extension of the original order authorizing or approving the interception of wire communication, and any evidence derived therefrom, shall be treated as having been obtained in violation of sections 542.400 to 542.422.  2. In addition to any other right to appeal, the state shall have the right to appeal from an order granting a motion to suppress made under subsection 1 of this section if the prosecuting attorney shall certify to the court or other official granting such motion that the appeal be taken within thirty days after the date the order was entered and shall be diligently prosecuted. ­­-------- (L. 1989 H.B. 277, et al. § 8, A.L. 2002 S.B. 712)
MO Rev Stat § 542.418 (2021)
2021 Missouri Revised Statutes|Title XXXVII - Criminal Procedure|Chapter 542 - Proceedings to Preserve the Peace — Searches and Seizures|Section 542.418 - Use of contents of wiretap in civil action, limitations on — illegal wiretap, cause of action, damages, attorney fees and costs — good faith reliance on court order a prima facie defense.

Effective - 28 Aug 2002   542.418. Use of contents of wiretap in civil action, limitations on — illegal wiretap, cause of action, damages, attorney fees and costs — good faith reliance on court order a prima facie defense. — 1. The contents of any wire communication or evidence derived therefrom shall not be received in evidence or otherwise disclosed in any civil or administrative proceeding, except in civil actions brought pursuant to this section.  2. Any person whose wire communication is intercepted, disclosed, or used in violation of sections 542.400 to 542.422 shall:  (1) Have a civil cause of action against any person who intercepts, discloses, or uses, or procures any other person to intercept, disclose, or use such communications; and  (2) Be entitled to recover from any such person:  (a) Actual damages, but not less than liquidated damages computed at the rate of one hundred dollars a day for each day of violation or ten thousand dollars whichever is greater;  (b) Punitive damages on a showing of a willful or intentional violation of sections 542.400 to 542.422; and  (c) A reasonable attorney's fee and other litigation costs reasonably incurred.  3. A good faith reliance on a court order or on the provisions of section 542.408 shall constitute a prima facie defense to any civil or criminal action brought under sections 542.400 to 542.422.  4. Nothing contained in this section shall limit any cause of action available prior to August 28, 1989. ­­-------- (L. 1989 H.B. 277, et al. § 10, A.L. 2002 S.B. 712)  (1998) Communications between a cellular phone and a regular wire phone are wire communications within the purview of the wiretap law. Lee v. Lee, 967 S.W.2d 82 (Mo.App. W.D.). (1999) Section applies only to exclude evidence obtained pursuant to an authorized wiretap. Phillips v. American Motorist Insurance Co., 996 S.W.2d 584 (Mo.App.W.D.).
MO Rev Stat § 542.420 (2021)
2021 Missouri Revised Statutes|Title XXXVII - Criminal Procedure|Chapter 542 - Proceedings to Preserve the Peace — Searches and Seizures|Section 542.420 - Evidence obtained in violation of law may not be used.

Effective - 28 Aug 2002, 2 histories   542.420. Evidence obtained in violation of law may not be used. — Whenever any wire communication has been intercepted, no part of the contents of such communication and no evidence derived therefrom may be received in evidence in any trial, hearing, or other proceeding in or before any court, grand jury, department, officer, agency, regulatory body, legislative committee, or other authority of the United States, a state, or a political subdivision thereof if the disclosure of that information would be in violation of sections 542.400 to 542.422. ­­-------- (L. 1989 H.B. 277, et al. § 11, A.L. 2002 S.B. 712)  (1998) Communications between a cellular phone and a regular wire phone are wire communications within the purview of the wiretap law. Lee v. Lee, 967 S.W.2d 82 (Mo.App. W.D.).
MO Rev Stat § 542.422 (2021)
2021 Missouri Revised Statutes|Title XXXVII - Criminal Procedure|Chapter 542 - Proceedings to Preserve the Peace — Searches and Seizures|Section 542.422 - Injunctions of felony violations of sections 542.400 to 542.424, procedure.

Effective - 28 Aug 2002   542.422. Injunctions of felony violations of sections 542.400 to 542.424, procedure. — Whenever it shall appear that any person is engaged or is about to engage in any act which constitutes or will constitute a felony violation of sections 542.400 to 542.422, the attorney general may initiate a civil action in a circuit court to enjoin such violation. The court shall proceed as soon as practicable to the hearing and determination of such an action, and may, at any time before final determination, enter such a restraining order or prohibition, or take such other action, as is warranted to prevent a continuing and substantial injury to the state or to any person or class of persons for whose protection the action is brought. A proceeding under this section is governed by the rules of civil procedure except that, if an indictment has been returned against the respondent, discovery is governed by the rules of criminal procedure. ­­-------- (L. 1989 H.B. 277, et al. § 12, A.L. 2002 S.B. 712)
MO Rev Stat § 542.425 (2021)
2021 Missouri Revised Statutes|Title XXXVII - Criminal Procedure|Chapter 542 - Proceedings to Preserve the Peace — Searches and Seizures|Section 542.425 - Criminal investigations, site of criminal conduct undetermined, attorney general may subpoena witnesses and documents.

Effective - 01 Jan 2017   542.425. Criminal investigations, site of criminal conduct undetermined, attorney general may subpoena witnesses and documents. — In the course of a criminal investigation under chapter 566 or 573, when the venue of the alleged criminal conduct cannot be readily determined without further investigation, the attorney general may request the prosecuting attorney of Cole County to request a circuit or associate circuit judge of Cole County to issue a subpoena to any witness who may have information for the purpose of oral examination under oath or to require access to data or the production of books, papers, records, or other material of evidentiary nature at the office of the attorney general. If, upon review of the evidence produced pursuant to the subpoenas, it appears that a violation of chapter 566 or 573 may have been committed, the attorney general shall provide the evidence produced pursuant to subpoena to an appropriate county prosecuting attorney or circuit attorney having venue over the criminal offense. ­­-------- (L. 2009 H.B. 62, A.L. 2014 S.B. 491)  Transferred 2014; formerly 566.013; Effective 1-01-17
MO Rev Stat § 542.525 (2021)
2021 Missouri Revised Statutes|Title XXXVII - Criminal Procedure|Chapter 542 - Proceedings to Preserve the Peace — Searches and Seizures|Section 542.525 - Surveillance or game cameras on private property, state and local government prohibited from placing without landowner consent.

Effective - 28 Aug 2021   542.525. Surveillance or game cameras on private property, state and local government prohibited from placing without landowner consent. — No employee of a state agency or a political subdivision of the state shall place any surveillance camera or game camera on private property without first obtaining consent from the landowner or the landowner's* designee; a search warrant as required by and under Article I, Section 15 of the Constitution of Missouri or the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments of the Constitution of the United States; or permission from the highest ranking law enforcement chief or officer of the agency or political subdivision, provided that permission of the highest ranking law enforcement chief or officer of the agency or political subdivision is valid only when the camera is facing a location that is open to public access or use and the camera is located within one hundred feet of the intended surveillance location. ­­-------- (L. 2021 H.B. 369 merged with S.B. 26)  *Words "his or her" appear in original rolls of H.B. 369, 2021.
MO Rev Stat § 543.200 (2021)
2021 Missouri Revised Statutes|Title XXXVII - Criminal Procedure|Chapter 543 - Proceedings in Misdemeanor and Infraction Cases|Section 543.200 - Either party may demand jury.

Effective - 28 Aug 1993   543.200. Either party may demand jury. — In misdemeanor cases, after the plea of the defendant has been entered, if he pleads not guilty, the defendant or prosecuting attorney may demand a jury; but if no jury is demanded, the case may be tried by the associate circuit judge. ­­-------- (RSMo 1939 § 3825, A.L. 1945 p. 750 § 20, A.L. 1978 H.B. 1634, A.L. 1993 S.B. 180)  Prior revisions: 1929 § 3435; 1919 § 3780; 1909 § 4988  (1956) Appeal from conviction in city court is to be tried de novo in the same manner as if case originated in court of criminal correction. Thus defendant on request is entitled to jury trial. City of St. Louis v. Moore (A.), 288 S.W.2d 383.