reglab/housing_qa huggingface dataset:
OR Rev Stat § 813.328 (2021)
2021 Oregon Revised Statutes|Volume : 19 - Utilities, Vehicle Code, Watercraft, Aviation|Chapter 813 - Driving Under the Influence of Intoxicants|Section 813.328 - Notice of intent to challenge validity of prior convictions.

(1) A defendant who challenges the validity of prior convictions alleged by the state as an element of felony driving while under the influence of intoxicants must give notice of the intent to challenge the validity of the prior convictions at least seven days prior to the first date set for trial on the felony charge. The validity of the prior convictions shall be determined prior to trial by the court. (2) As used in this section, "conviction" includes a juvenile adjudication. [1999 c.1049 §4; 2009 c.525 §3]
OR Rev Stat § 813.400 (2021)
2021 Oregon Revised Statutes|Volume : 19 - Utilities, Vehicle Code, Watercraft, Aviation|Chapter 813 - Driving Under the Influence of Intoxicants|Section 813.400 - Suspension or revocation upon conviction; duration; review.

(1) Except as provided in subsection (2) of this section, upon receipt of a record of conviction for misdemeanor driving while under the influence of intoxicants, the Department of Transportation shall suspend the driving privileges of the person convicted. The suspension shall be for a period described under Schedule II of ORS 809.428, except the department shall not reinstate any driving privileges to the person until the person complies with future responsibility filings. A person is entitled to administrative review under ORS 809.440 of a suspension imposed under this subsection. (2) A person convicted of felony driving while under the influence of intoxicants, or a person convicted of misdemeanor driving while under the influence of intoxicants for a third or subsequent time, is subject to revocation of driving privileges as provided in ORS 809.235. [1983 c.338 §353(8); 1985 c.16 §166(8); 1985 c.393 §10a(8); 1985 c.669 §2a(8); 1991 c.702 §13; 2001 c.786 §3; 2003 c.346 §1; 2003 c.402 §40; 2005 c.436 §2]
OR Rev Stat § 813.412 (2021)
2021 Oregon Revised Statutes|Volume : 19 - Utilities, Vehicle Code, Watercraft, Aviation|Chapter 813 - Driving Under the Influence of Intoxicants|Section 813.412 - Role of police officer in implied consent hearing.

Notwithstanding ORS 9.160 and 9.320, in any hearing under ORS 813.410 in which a city attorney or district attorney does not appear, a police officer actively involved in the investigation of the offense may present evidence, examine and cross-examine witnesses and make arguments relating to: (1) The application of statutes and rules to the facts in the case; (2) The literal meaning of the statutes or rules at issue in the case; (3) The admissibility of evidence; and (4) Proper procedures to be used in the hearing. [1999 c.831 §4; 2010 c.37 §2] Note: 813.412 was enacted into law by the Legislative Assembly but was not added to or made a part of the Oregon Vehicle Code or any chapter or series therein by legislative action. See Preface to Oregon Revised Statutes for further explanation.
OR Rev Stat § 813.420 (2021)
2021 Oregon Revised Statutes|Volume : 19 - Utilities, Vehicle Code, Watercraft, Aviation|Chapter 813 - Driving Under the Influence of Intoxicants|Section 813.420 - Duration of suspension for refusal or failure of test.

When the Department of Transportation imposes a suspension under ORS 813.410, the suspension shall be for a period of time determined according to the following: (1) If the suspension is for refusal of a test under ORS 813.100 and the person is not subject to an increase in the suspension time for reasons described in ORS 813.430, the suspension shall be for a period of one year. (2) If the suspension is for refusal of a test under ORS 813.100 and the person is subject to an increase in the suspension time for reasons described in ORS 813.430, the suspension shall be for a period of three years. (3) If the suspension is because a breath or blood test under ORS 813.100 disclosed that the person had a level of alcohol in the person’s blood that constituted being under the influence of intoxicating liquor under ORS 813.300 and the person is not subject to an increase in the suspension time for reasons described in ORS 813.430, the suspension shall be for a period of 90 days. (4) If the suspension is because a breath or blood test under ORS 813.100 disclosed that the person had a level of alcohol in the person’s blood that constituted being under the influence of intoxicating liquor under ORS 813.300 and the person is subject to an increase in the suspension time for reasons described in ORS 813.430, the suspension shall be for a period of one year. [1985 c.16 §171; 1993 c.305 §7; 1995 c.568 §7]
OR Rev Stat § 813.430 (2021)
2021 Oregon Revised Statutes|Volume : 19 - Utilities, Vehicle Code, Watercraft, Aviation|Chapter 813 - Driving Under the Influence of Intoxicants|Section 813.430 - Grounds for increase in duration of suspension.

This section establishes circumstances under which ORS 813.420 requires an increase in the time for suspension of driving privileges and under which ORS 813.520 requires an increase in the time before the Department of Transportation may issue a hardship permit. A person is subject to an increase in suspension time under this section if any of the following apply: (1) The person is presently participating in a driving while under the influence of intoxicants diversion program in this state or in any similar alcohol or drug rehabilitation program in this or another jurisdiction. (2) Within the five years preceding the date of arrest any of the following occurred: (a) A suspension of the person’s driving privileges under ORS 813.410 or 482.540 (1981 Replacement Part) became effective. (b) The person was convicted of: (A) Driving while under the influence of intoxicants in violation of: (i) ORS 813.010; (ii) The statutory counterpart to ORS 813.010 in another jurisdiction; or (iii) A municipal ordinance in this state or another jurisdiction; (B) A driving under the influence of intoxicants offense in another jurisdiction that involved the impaired driving of a vehicle due to the use of intoxicating liquor, cannabis, psilocybin, a controlled substance, an inhalant or any combination thereof; or (C) A driving offense in another jurisdiction that involved operating a vehicle while having a blood alcohol content above that jurisdiction’s permissible blood alcohol content. (c) The person commenced participating in a driving while under the influence of intoxicants diversion program in this state or in any similar alcohol or drug rehabilitation program in this or another jurisdiction. (3) For the purposes of subsection (2)(b) of this section, a conviction for a driving offense in another jurisdiction based solely on a person under 21 years of age having a blood alcohol content that is lower than the permissible blood alcohol content in that jurisdiction for a person 21 years of age or older does not constitute a prior conviction. [1985 c.16 §173; 1985 c.672 §15; 1987 c.801 §12; 2007 c.879 §8; 2017 c.21 §87; 2021 c.253 §13]
OR Rev Stat § 813.450 (2021)
2021 Oregon Revised Statutes|Volume : 19 - Utilities, Vehicle Code, Watercraft, Aviation|Chapter 813 - Driving Under the Influence of Intoxicants|Section 813.450 - Appeal from suspension for refusal or failure of breath test.

(1) The petition to the circuit court appealing an order of the Department of Transportation after a hearing under ORS 813.410 shall state the nature of the petitioner’s interest and the ground or grounds upon which the petitioner contends the order should be reversed or remanded. (2) The court shall conduct the review without a jury. Review shall be limited to the record of the department’s hearing. (3) Any party to the proceedings before the circuit court may appeal from the judgment of the court to the Court of Appeals. (4) Upon review in the circuit court and Court of Appeals, the court may affirm, reverse or remand the order as follows: (a) If the court finds that the department has erroneously interpreted a provision of law and that a correct interpretation compels a particular action, it shall: (A) Set aside or modify the order; or (B) Remand the case to the department for further action under a correct interpretation of the provision of law. (b) The court shall remand the order to the department if it finds the department’s exercise of discretion to be any of the following: (A) Outside the range of discretion delegated to the agency by law. (B) Inconsistent with a department rule, an officially stated department position, or a prior department practice, if the inconsistency is not explained by the department. (C) Otherwise in violation of a constitutional or statutory provision. (c) The court shall set aside or remand the order if it finds that the order is not supported by substantial evidence in the record. (5) Upon review, the court shall affirm the department’s order unless the court finds a ground for setting aside, modifying or remanding to the department under a specified provision of this section. (6) In any review under this section, the court shall also review de novo determinations made by an agency that are subject to ORS 183.650 (4). [1985 c.672 §23; 1999 c.849 §§196,197; 2003 c.75 §69]
OR Rev Stat § 813.460 (2021)
2021 Oregon Revised Statutes|Volume : 19 - Utilities, Vehicle Code, Watercraft, Aviation|Chapter 813 - Driving Under the Influence of Intoxicants|Section 813.460 - Department procedures upon verification of suspension of driving privileges of wrong person.

If the Department of Transportation verifies to its satisfaction that it has suspended the driving privileges of the wrong person under ORS 813.410 because a person arrested for driving under the influence of intoxicants gave false identification at the time of the arrest, all the following apply: (1) The department shall immediately rescind the suspension order under the false name and shall issue a suspension order for the period set forth in ORS 813.420 to the person arrested. (2) The department shall issue the order in the manner set forth in ORS 809.430. (3) No further notice of suspension need be given. (4) The time limitations in ORS 813.410 (1), (2), (3) and (4)(e) do not apply to a suspension order issued under this section. [1985 c.672 §25; 1989 c.636 §47] Note: The amendments to 813.460 by section 119, chapter 630, Oregon Laws 2021, become operative January 1, 2023, and apply to conduct leading to driving privilege sanctions imposed on or after January 1, 2023. See sections 124 and 169, chapter 630, Oregon Laws 2021. The text that is operative on and after January 1, 2023, is set forth for the user’s convenience. If the Department of Transportation verifies to its satisfaction that it has suspended the driving privileges of the wrong person under ORS 813.410 because a person arrested for driving under the influence of intoxicants gave false identification at the time of the arrest, all the following apply: (1) The department shall immediately rescind the suspension order under the false name and shall issue a suspension order for the period set forth in ORS 813.420 to the person arrested. (2) The department shall issue the order in the manner set forth in ORS 809.430. (3) No further notice of suspension need be given. (4) The time limitations in ORS 813.410 (1), (2), (3), (4) and (5)(e) do not apply to a suspension order issued under this section.
OR Rev Stat § 813.470 (2021)
2021 Oregon Revised Statutes|Volume : 19 - Utilities, Vehicle Code, Watercraft, Aviation|Chapter 813 - Driving Under the Influence of Intoxicants|Section 813.470 - Department notation on record of person acquitted after suspension.

The Department of Transportation shall make a notation on the driving record of a person indicating that the person was acquitted of a charge of driving under the influence of intoxicants if: (1) The person’s driving privileges were suspended because a breath or blood test under ORS 813.100 disclosed that the person had a level of alcohol in the person’s blood that constituted being under the influence of intoxicating liquor under ORS 813.300; (2) An accusatory instrument was filed charging the person with driving under the influence of intoxicants in violation of ORS 813.010 arising out of the same incident that led to the suspension of the person’s driving privileges; (3) The person was acquitted of the charge; and (4) The person presents the department with a certified copy of the judgment of acquittal from the court clearly showing the location of the court, the date of the arrest and the findings of the court. [1987 c.303 §2; 1993 c.305 §8; 1995 c.568 §8]
OR Rev Stat § 813.520 (2021)
2021 Oregon Revised Statutes|Volume : 19 - Utilities, Vehicle Code, Watercraft, Aviation|Chapter 813 - Driving Under the Influence of Intoxicants|Section 813.520 - Limitations on authority to issue hardship permit or reinstate driving privileges.

The Department of Transportation may not reinstate any driving privileges or issue any hardship permit under ORS 807.240 as provided under any of the following: (1) For a period of 90 days after the beginning of the suspension if the suspension is for refusal of a test under ORS 813.100 and the person is not subject to an increase in the time before a permit may be issued for reasons described in ORS 813.430. (2) For a period of 30 days after the beginning of the suspension if the suspension is because a breath or blood test under ORS 813.100 disclosed that the person had a level of alcohol in the person’s blood that constituted being under the influence of intoxicating liquor under ORS 813.300 and the person is not subject to an increase in the time before a hardship permit may be issued for reasons described in ORS 813.430. (3) For a period of one year after the beginning of the suspension if the suspension is because a breath or blood test under ORS 813.100 disclosed that the person had a level of alcohol in the person’s blood that constituted being under the influence of intoxicating liquor under ORS 813.300 and the person is subject to an increase in the time before a hardship permit may be issued for reasons described under ORS 813.430. (4) For a period of three years after the beginning of the suspension if the suspension is for refusal of a test under ORS 813.100 and the person is subject to an increase in the time before a hardship permit may be issued for reasons described in ORS 813.430. (5) To any person who has a mental or physical condition or impairment that affects the person’s ability to safely operate a motor vehicle. (6) If the suspension is based upon a conviction for a violation of ORS 813.010 or is imposed under ORS 813.410 based upon ORS 813.100 to a person who has available public or private transportation sufficient to fulfill the person’s transportation needs while the person is suspended. (7) For a period of 30 days following imposition of suspension, if the person, within the previous year, has been convicted of a traffic crime and the suspension is based upon a conviction for violation of ORS 813.010 or is imposed under ORS 813.410 based upon ORS 813.100. [1985 c.16 §148; 1985 c.672 §16; 1987 c.673 §1a; 1987 c.801 §15; 1989 c.224 §141; 1989 c.401 §3; 1993 c.305 §9; 1995 c.568 §9; 1999 c.1051 §91; 2005 c.140 §5; 2009 c.607 §1; 2018 c.76 §15]
OR Rev Stat § 813.599 (2021)
2021 Oregon Revised Statutes|Volume : 19 - Utilities, Vehicle Code, Watercraft, Aviation|Chapter 813 - Driving Under the Influence of Intoxicants|Section 813.599 - Definitions.

As used in ORS chapter 813: (1) "Ignition interlock device technician" means an individual employed by a service center to install, service, maintain, calibrate or remove ignition interlock devices. (2) "Manufacturer’s representative" means a business entity: (a) That is registered with or authorized by the Secretary of State to transact business in this state; (b) That is designated by an ignition interlock device manufacturer to sell, rent or lease a specific ignition interlock device model in Oregon; and (c) That provides statewide ignition interlock device service through the operation of a network of service centers. (3) "Negative report" includes a report of tampering with an ignition interlock device, unauthorized removal of an ignition interlock device, lockout or a test violation recorded by an ignition interlock device. (4) "Service center" means a private entity that installs, services, maintains, calibrates and removes ignition interlock devices in this state. (5) "Test violation" means: (a) For a person who is required to use an ignition interlock device as a condition of a driving while under the influence of intoxicants diversion agreement: (A) An attempt to start a vehicle while the person has a blood alcohol content higher than 0.02 percent by weight unless a subsequent test performed within 10 minutes registers a blood alcohol content of 0.02 percent by weight or lower and a digital image confirms that the same person provided both samples; or (B) Failure to pass a random retest due to a blood alcohol content higher than 0.02 percent by weight unless a subsequent test performed within 10 minutes registers a blood alcohol content of 0.02 percent by weight or lower and a digital image confirms that the same person provided both samples; (b) For a person who is required to use an ignition interlock device and is not subject to a driving while under the influence of intoxicants diversion agreement: (A) An attempt to start a vehicle while the person has a blood alcohol level higher than 0.02 percent by weight unless a subsequent test performed within 10 minutes registers a blood alcohol content of 0.02 percent by weight or lower and a digital image confirms that the same person provided both samples; or (B) Failure to pass a random retest due to a blood alcohol content higher than 0.02 percent by weight unless a subsequent test performed within 10 minutes registers a blood alcohol content of 0.02 percent by weight or lower and a digital image confirms that the same person provided both samples; or (c) For any person required to use an ignition interlock device, a failure to take a random retest. [2017 c.655 §2; 2019 c.200 §3]
OR Rev Stat § 813.600 (2021)
2021 Oregon Revised Statutes|Volume : 19 - Utilities, Vehicle Code, Watercraft, Aviation|Chapter 813 - Driving Under the Influence of Intoxicants|Section 813.600 - Ignition interlock program; rules.

(1) The Department of State Police, in consultation with the Transportation Safety Committee, shall establish a program for the use of ignition interlock devices by persons convicted of driving while under the influence of intoxicants and granted hardship permits under ORS 807.240 and by persons who have entered into a driving while under the influence of intoxicants diversion agreement. (2) The department shall adopt rules that specify requirements for ignition interlock devices that may be used and shall publish a list of devices that meet the requirements. The list may include devices that: (a) Do not impede the safe operation of the vehicle; (b) Have the fewest opportunities to be bypassed; (c) Correlate well with established measures of alcohol impairment; (d) Work accurately and reliably in an unsupervised environment; (e) Require a deep lung breath sample or other accurate measure of blood alcohol content equivalence; (f) Resist tampering and give evidence if tampering is attempted; (g) Are difficult to circumvent, and require premeditation to do so; (h) Minimize inconvenience to a sober user; (i) Operate reliably over the range of automobile environments or automobile manufacturing standards; (j) Are manufactured by a party who is adequately insured for product liability; (k) Have a label affixed in a prominent location warning that any person tampering with, circumventing or otherwise misusing the device is subject to civil penalty; and (L) If there is a test violation, record the locational coordinate information of the vehicle, including latitude and longitude as established by a global positioning system. (3) The department shall adopt rules for the annual testing of ignition interlock devices. The rules shall establish standards for the devices and for the performance of the devices. [1987 c.746 §1; 1991 c.453 §14; 1993 c.382 §2; 2011 c.671 §1; 2017 c.655 §§7,19]
OR Rev Stat § 813.603 (2021)
2021 Oregon Revised Statutes|Volume : 19 - Utilities, Vehicle Code, Watercraft, Aviation|Chapter 813 - Driving Under the Influence of Intoxicants|Section 813.603 - Waiver of costs of ignition interlock device; rules.

(1) Except as provided in subsection (2) of this section, if an ignition interlock device is ordered or required under ORS 813.602, the person so ordered or required shall pay to the manufacturer’s representative the reasonable costs of leasing, installing and maintaining the device. A payment schedule may be established for the person by the Department of State Police, in consultation with the Transportation Safety Committee. (2) The department may waive, in whole or in part, or defer the person’s responsibility to pay all or part of the costs under subsection (1) of this section if the person meets the criteria for indigence established for waiving or deferring such costs under subsection (3) of this section. If the person’s responsibility for costs is waived, then notwithstanding ORS 813.270, the costs described in subsection (1) of this section must be paid from the Intoxicated Driver Program Fund. (3) The department, by rule, shall establish criteria and procedures for qualification to waive or defer costs described under subsection (1) of this section for indigence. The criteria must be consistent with the standards for indigence adopted by the federal government for purposes of the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program. [2015 c.577 §7; 2017 c.655 §§12,20; 2019 c.200 §§8,9] Note: 813.603 was added to and made a part of ORS chapter 813 by legislative action but was not added to any smaller series therein. See Preface to Oregon Revised Statutes for further explanation.
OR Rev Stat § 813.604 (2021)
2021 Oregon Revised Statutes|Volume : 19 - Utilities, Vehicle Code, Watercraft, Aviation|Chapter 813 - Driving Under the Influence of Intoxicants|Section 813.604 - Notice of court order; notation on hardship permit; rules.

(1) When a court orders installation of an ignition interlock device pursuant to ORS 813.602, the court shall send a copy of the order to the Department of Transportation. The department shall note the requirement on the driving record of the person required to install the device. (2) The department may not issue a hardship permit under ORS 807.240 to any person who is ordered to install an ignition interlock device on the person’s vehicle until the person furnishes the department satisfactory proof that the device has been installed on any vehicle owned or operated by the person. The department shall determine by rule what constitutes satisfactory proof under this subsection. (3) When the department issues a hardship permit to a person who is required to have an ignition interlock device, the department shall note on the permit that the device is required. The notation constitutes a limitation on the permit and a person who violates the limitation is punishable as provided in ORS 811.182 for criminal driving while suspended or revoked. [1987 c.746 §3; 1989 c.398 §2; 1997 c.249 §235]