NM Stat § 55-2A-201 (2021)
2021 New Mexico Statutes|Chapter 55 - Uniform Commercial Code|Article 2A - Leases|Part 2 - FORMATION AND CONSTRUCTION OF LEASE CONTRACT|Section 55-2A-201 - Statute of frauds.

(1) A lease contract is not enforceable by way of action or defense unless: (a) the total payments to be made under the lease contract, excluding payments for options to renew or buy, are less than one thousand dollars ($1,000); or (b) there is a writing, signed by the party against whom enforcement is sought or by that party's authorized agent, sufficient to indicate that a lease contract has been made between the parties and to describe the goods leased and the lease term. (2) Any description of leased goods or of the lease term is sufficient and satisfies Subsection (1)(b), whether or not it is specific, if it reasonably identifies what is described. (3) A writing is not insufficient because it omits or incorrectly states a term agreed upon, but the lease contract is not enforceable under Subsection (1)(b) beyond the lease term and the quantity of goods shown in the writing. (4) A lease contract that does not satisfy the requirements of Subsection (1), but which is valid in other respects, is enforceable: (a) if the goods are to be specially manufactured or obtained for the lessee and are not suitable for lease or sale to others in the ordinary course of the lessor's business, and the lessor, before notice of repudiation is received and under circumstances that reasonably indicate that the goods are for the lessee, has made either a substantial beginning of their manufacture or commitments for their procurement; (b) if the party against whom enforcement is sought admits in that party's pleading, testimony or otherwise in court that a lease contract was made, but the lease contract is not enforceable under this provision beyond the quantity of goods admitted; or (c) with respect to goods that have been received and accepted by the lessee. (5) The lease term under a lease contract referred to in Subsection (4) is: (a) if there is a writing signed by the party against whom enforcement is sought or by that party's authorized agent specifying the lease term, the term so specified; (b) if the party against whom enforcement is sought admits in that party's pleading, testimony, or otherwise in court a lease term, the term so admitted; or (c) a reasonable lease term. History: 1978 Comp., § 55-2A-201, enacted by Laws 1992, ch. 114, § 17. ANNOTATIONSOFFICIAL COMMENTS UCC Official Comments by ALI & the NCCUSL. Reproduced with permission of the PEB for the UCC. All rights reserved. Uniform Statutory Source. — Sections 2-201, 9-203(1) and 9-110 [55-2-201, 55-9-203 and 55-9-110 NMSA 1978, respectively]. Changes. — This section is modeled on Section 2-201 [55-2-201 NMSA 1978], with changes to reflect the differences between a lease contract and a contract for the sale of goods. In particular, subsection (1)(b) adds a requirement that the writing "describe the goods leased and the lease term", borrowing that concept, with revisions, from the provisions of Section 9-203(1)(a) [55-9-203 NMSA 1978]. Subsection (2), relying on the statutory analogue in Section 9-110 [55-9-110 NMSA 1978], sets forth the minimum criterion for satisfying that requirement. Purposes. — The changes in this section conform the provisions of Section 2-201 [55-2-201 NMSA 1978] to custom and usage in lease transactions. Section 2-201(2) [55-2-201 NMSA 1978], stating a special rule between merchants, was not included in this section as the number of such transactions involving leases, as opposed to sales, was thought to be modest. Subsection (4) creates no exception for transactions where payment has been made and accepted. This represents a departure from the analogue, Section 2-201(3)(c) [55-2-201 NMSA 1978]. The rationale for the departure is grounded in the distinction between sales and leases. Unlike a buyer in a sales transaction, the lessee does not tender payment in full for goods delivered, but only payment of rent for one or more months. It was decided that, as a matter of policy, this act of payment is not a sufficient substitute for the required memorandum. Subsection (5) was needed to establish the criteria for supplying the lease term if it is omitted, as the lease contract may still be enforceable under subsection (4). Cross References. — Sections 2-201, 9-110 and 9-203(1)(a) [55-2-201, 55-9-110 and 55-9-203 NMSA 1978, respectively]. "Action". Section 1-201(1) [55-1-201 NMSA 1978]. "Agreed". Section 1-201(3) [55-1-201 NMSA 1978]. "Buying". Section 2A-103(1)(a) [55-2A-103 NMSA 1978]. "Goods". Section 2A-103(1)(h) [55-2A-103 NMSA 1978]. "Lease". Section 2A-103(1)(j) [55-2A-103 NMSA 1978]. "Lease contract". Section 2A-103(1)(l) [55-2A-103 NMSA 1978]. "Lessee". Section 2A-103(1)(n) [55-2A-103 NMSA 1978]. "Lessor". Section 2A-103(1)(p) [55-2A-103 NMSA 1978]. "Notice". Section 1-201(25) [55-1-201 NMSA 1978]. "Party". Section 1-201(29) [55-1-201 NMSA 1978]. "Sale". Section 2-106(1) [55-2-106 NMSA 1978]. "Signed". Section 1-201(39) [55-1-201 NMSA 1978]. "Term". Section 1-201(42) [55-1-201 NMSA 1978]. "Writing". Section 1-201(46) [55-1-201 NMSA 1978]. Effective dates. — Laws 1992, ch. 114, § 238 made Laws 1992, ch. 114, § 17 effective July 1, 1992.