reglab/housing_qa huggingface dataset:
WI Stat § 409.327 (2021)
2021 Wisconsin Statutes & Annotations|Chapter 409 - Uniform commercial code — secured transactions.|409.327 - Priority of security interests in deposit account.

409.327  Priority of security interests in deposit account. The following rules govern priority among conflicting security interests in the same deposit account: (1)  Control by secured party. A security interest held by a secured party having control of the deposit account under s. 409.104 has priority over a conflicting security interest held by a secured party that does not have control. (2)  Priority in time of control. Except as otherwise provided in subs. (3) and (4), security interests perfected by control under s. 409.314 rank according to priority in time of obtaining control. (3)  Priority of bank regarding deposit account. Except as otherwise provided in sub. (4), a security interest held by the bank with which the deposit account is maintained has priority over a conflicting security interest held by another secured party. (4)  Priority over bank regarding deposit account. A security interest perfected by control under s. 409.104 (1) (c) has priority over a security interest held by the bank with which the deposit account is maintained.History:  2001 a. 10.
WI Stat § 409.328 (2021)
2021 Wisconsin Statutes & Annotations|Chapter 409 - Uniform commercial code — secured transactions.|409.328 - Priority of security interests in investment property.

409.328  Priority of security interests in investment property. The following rules govern priority among conflicting security interests in the same investment property: (1)  Control by secured party. A security interest held by a secured party having control of investment property under s. 409.106 has priority over a security interest held by a secured party that does not have control of the investment property. (2)  Priority in time of control. Except as otherwise provided in subs. (3) and (4), conflicting security interests held by secured parties each of which has control under s. 409.106 rank according to priority in time of:(a) If the collateral is a security, obtaining control;(b) If the collateral is a security entitlement carried in a securities account and:1. If the secured party obtained control under s. 408.106 (4) (a), the secured party's becoming the person for which the securities account is maintained;2. If the secured party obtained control under s. 408.106 (4) (b), the securities intermediary's agreement to comply with the secured party's entitlement orders with respect to security entitlements carried or to be carried in the securities account; or3. If the secured party obtained control through another person under s. 408.106 (4) (c), the time on which priority would be based under this subsection if the other person were the secured party; or(c) If the collateral is a commodity contract carried with a commodity intermediary, the satisfaction of the requirement for control specified in s. 409.106 (2) (b) with respect to commodity contracts carried or to be carried with the commodity intermediary. (3)  Priority of securities intermediary regarding entitlement or account. A security interest held by a securities intermediary in a security entitlement or a securities account maintained with the securities intermediary has priority over a conflicting security interest held by another secured party. (4)  Priority of securities intermediary regarding contract or account. A security interest held by a commodity intermediary in a commodity contract or a commodity account maintained with the commodity intermediary has priority over a conflicting security interest held by another secured party. (5)  Priority in certificated securities. A security interest in a certificated security in registered form which is perfected by taking delivery under s. 409.313 (1) and not by control under s. 409.314 has priority over a conflicting security interest perfected by a method other than control. (6)  Priority of conflicting security interests; intermediaries. Conflicting security interests created by a broker, securities intermediary, or commodity intermediary which are perfected without control under s. 409.106 rank equally. (7)  Priority of conflicting security interests; others. In all other cases, priority among conflicting security interests in investment property is governed by ss. 409.322 and 409.323.History:  2001 a. 10.
WI Stat § 409.329 (2021)
2021 Wisconsin Statutes & Annotations|Chapter 409 - Uniform commercial code — secured transactions.|409.329 - Priority of security interests in letter-of-credit right.

409.329  Priority of security interests in letter-of-credit right. The following rules govern priority among conflicting security interests in the same letter-of-credit right: (1)  Control by secured party. A security interest held by a secured party having control of the letter-of-credit right under s. 409.107 has priority to the extent of its control over a conflicting security interest held by a secured party that does not have control. (2)  Priority in time of control. Security interests perfected by control under s. 409.314 rank according to priority in time of obtaining control.History:  2001 a. 10.
WI Stat § 409.330 (2021)
2021 Wisconsin Statutes & Annotations|Chapter 409 - Uniform commercial code — secured transactions.|409.330 - Priority of purchaser of chattel paper or instrument.

409.330  Priority of purchaser of chattel paper or instrument. (1) Purchaser's priority: security interest claimed merely as proceeds. A purchaser of chattel paper has priority over a security interest in the chattel paper which is claimed merely as proceeds of inventory subject to a security interest if:(a) In good faith and in the ordinary course of the purchaser's business, the purchaser gives new value and takes possession of the chattel paper or obtains control of the chattel paper under s. 409.105; and(b) The chattel paper does not indicate that it has been assigned to an identified assignee other than the purchaser. (2)  Purchaser's priority: other security interests. A purchaser of chattel paper has priority over a security interest in the chattel paper which is claimed other than merely as proceeds of inventory subject to a security interest if the purchaser gives new value and takes possession of the chattel paper or obtains control of the chattel paper under s. 409.105 in good faith, in the ordinary course of the purchaser's business, and without knowledge that the purchase violates the rights of the secured party. (3)  Chattel paper purchaser's priority in proceeds. Except as otherwise provided in s. 409.327, a purchaser having priority in chattel paper under sub. (1) or (2) also has priority in proceeds of the chattel paper to the extent that:(a) Section 409.322 provides for priority in the proceeds; or(b) The proceeds consist of the specific goods covered by the chattel paper or cash proceeds of the specific goods, even if the purchaser's security interest in the proceeds is unperfected. (4)  Instrument purchaser's priority. Except as otherwise provided in s. 409.331 (1), a purchaser of an instrument has priority over a security interest in the instrument perfected by a method other than possession if the purchaser gives value and takes possession of the instrument in good faith and without knowledge that the purchase violates the rights of the secured party. (5)  Holder of purchase-money security interest gives new value. For purposes of subs. (1) and (2), the holder of a purchase-money security interest in inventory gives new value for chattel paper constituting proceeds of the inventory. (6)  Indication of assignment gives knowledge. For purposes of subs. (2) and (4), if chattel paper or an instrument indicates that it has been assigned to an identified secured party other than the purchaser, a purchaser of the chattel paper or instrument has knowledge that the purchase violates the rights of the secured party.History:  2001 a. 10.
WI Stat § 409.331 (2021)
2021 Wisconsin Statutes & Annotations|Chapter 409 - Uniform commercial code — secured transactions.|409.331 - Priority of rights of purchasers of instruments, documents, and securities under other chapters; priority of interests in financial assets and security entitlements under ch. 408.

409.331  Priority of rights of purchasers of instruments, documents, and securities under other chapters; priority of interests in financial assets and security entitlements under ch. 408. (1) Rights under chs. 403, 407, and 408 not limited. This chapter does not limit the rights of a holder in due course of a negotiable instrument, a holder to which a negotiable document of title has been duly negotiated, or a protected purchaser of a security. These holders or purchasers take priority over an earlier security interest, even if perfected, to the extent provided in chs. 403, 407, and 408. (2)  Protection under ch. 408. This chapter does not limit the rights of or impose liability on a person to the extent that the person is protected against the assertion of an adverse claim under ch. 408. (3)  Filing not notice. Filing under this chapter does not constitute notice of a claim or defense to the holders, or purchasers, or persons described in subs. (1) and (2).History:  2001 a. 10.
WI Stat § 409.332 (2021)
2021 Wisconsin Statutes & Annotations|Chapter 409 - Uniform commercial code — secured transactions.|409.332 - Transfer of money; transfer of funds from deposit account.

409.332  Transfer of money; transfer of funds from deposit account. (1) Transferee of money. A transferee of money takes the money free of a security interest unless the transferee acts in collusion with the debtor in violating the rights of the secured party. (2)  Transferee of funds from deposit account. A transferee of funds from a deposit account takes the funds free of a security interest in the deposit account unless the transferee acts in collusion with the debtor in violating the rights of the secured party.History:  2001 a. 10.
WI Stat § 409.333 (2021)
2021 Wisconsin Statutes & Annotations|Chapter 409 - Uniform commercial code — secured transactions.|409.333 - Priority of certain liens arising by operation of law.

409.333  Priority of certain liens arising by operation of law. (1) Possessory lien. In this section, “possessory lien" means an interest, other than a security interest or an agricultural lien:(a) Which secures payment or performance of an obligation for services or materials furnished with respect to goods by a person in the ordinary course of the person's business;(b) Which is created by statute or rule of law in favor of the person; and(c) Whose effectiveness depends on the person's possession of the goods. (2)  Priority of possessory lien. A possessory lien on goods has priority over a security interest in the goods unless the lien is created by a statute that expressly provides otherwise.History:  2001 a. 10.A lien under s. 779.43 (3) is contingent on possession and is a possessory lien under sub. (1) with priority over a security interest. Premier Community Bank v. Schuh, 2010 WI App 111, 329 Wis. 2d 146, 789 N.W.2d 388, 09-1722.
WI Stat § 409.335 (2021)
2021 Wisconsin Statutes & Annotations|Chapter 409 - Uniform commercial code — secured transactions.|409.335 - Accessions.

409.335  Accessions. (1) Creation of security interest in accession. A security interest may be created in an accession and continues in collateral that becomes an accession. (2)  Perfection of security interest. If a security interest is perfected when the collateral becomes an accession, the security interest remains perfected in the collateral. (3)  Priority of security interest. Except as otherwise provided in sub. (4), the other provisions of this subchapter determine the priority of a security interest in an accession. (4)  Compliance with certificate-of-title statute. A security interest in an accession is subordinate to a security interest in the whole which is perfected by compliance with the requirements of a certificate-of-title statute under s. 409.311 (2). (5)  Removal of accession after default. After default, subject to subch. VI, a secured party may remove an accession from other goods if the security interest in the accession has priority over the claims of every person having an interest in the whole. (6)  Reimbursement following removal. A secured party that removes an accession from other goods under sub. (5) shall promptly reimburse any holder of a security interest or other lien on, or owner of, the whole or of the other goods, other than the debtor, for the cost of repair of any physical injury to the whole or the other goods. The secured party need not reimburse the holder or owner for any diminution in value of the whole or the other goods caused by the absence of the accession removed or by any necessity for replacing it. A person entitled to reimbursement may refuse permission to remove an accession until the secured party gives adequate assurance for the performance of the obligation to reimburse.History:  2001 a. 10.
WI Stat § 409.336 (2021)
2021 Wisconsin Statutes & Annotations|Chapter 409 - Uniform commercial code — secured transactions.|409.336 - Commingled goods.

409.336  Commingled goods. (1) Commingled goods. In this section, “commingled goods" means goods that are physically united with other goods in such a manner that their identity is lost in a product or mass. (2)  No security interest in commingled goods as such. A security interest does not exist in commingled goods as such. However, a security interest may attach to a product or mass that results when goods become commingled goods. (3)  Attachment of security interest to product or mass. If collateral becomes commingled goods, a security interest attaches to the product or mass. (4)  Perfection of security interest. If a security interest in collateral is perfected before the collateral becomes commingled goods, the security interest that attaches to the product or mass under sub. (3) is perfected. (5)  Priority of security interest. Except as otherwise provided in sub. (6), the other provisions of this subchapter determine the priority of a security interest that attaches to the product or mass under sub. (3). (6)  Conflicting security interests in product or mass. If more than one security interest attaches to the product or mass under sub. (3), the following rules determine priority:(a) A security interest that is perfected under sub. (4) has priority over a security interest that is unperfected at the time the collateral becomes commingled goods.(b) If more than one security interest is perfected under sub. (4), the security interests rank equally in proportion to the value of the collateral at the time it became commingled goods.History:  2001 a. 10.
WI Stat § 409.337 (2021)
2021 Wisconsin Statutes & Annotations|Chapter 409 - Uniform commercial code — secured transactions.|409.337 - Priority of security interests in goods covered by certificate of title.

409.337  Priority of security interests in goods covered by certificate of title. If, while a security interest in goods is perfected by any method under the law of another jurisdiction, this state issues a certificate of title that does not show that the goods are subject to the security interest or contain a statement that they may be subject to security interests not shown on the certificate: (1) A buyer of the goods, other than a person in the business of selling goods of that kind, takes free of the security interest if the buyer gives value and receives delivery of the goods after issuance of the certificate and without knowledge of the security interest; and (2) The security interest is subordinate to a conflicting security interest in the goods that attaches, and is perfected under s. 409.311 (2), after issuance of the certificate and without the conflicting secured party's knowledge of the security interest.History:  2001 a. 10.
WI Stat § 409.338 (2021)
2021 Wisconsin Statutes & Annotations|Chapter 409 - Uniform commercial code — secured transactions.|409.338 - Priority of security interest or agricultural lien perfected by filed financing statement providing certain incorrect information.

409.338  Priority of security interest or agricultural lien perfected by filed financing statement providing certain incorrect information. If a security interest or agricultural lien is perfected by a filed financing statement providing information described in s. 409.516 (2) (e) which is incorrect at the time the financing statement is filed: (1) The security interest or agricultural lien is subordinate to a conflicting perfected security interest in the collateral to the extent that the holder of the conflicting security interest gives value in reasonable reliance upon the incorrect information; and (2) A purchaser, other than a secured party, of the collateral takes free of the security interest or agricultural lien to the extent that, in reasonable reliance upon the incorrect information, the purchaser gives value and, in the case of tangible chattel paper, tangible documents, goods, instruments, or a security certificate, receives delivery of the collateral. History:  2001 a. 10; 2009 a. 322.
WI Stat § 409.339 (2021)
2021 Wisconsin Statutes & Annotations|Chapter 409 - Uniform commercial code — secured transactions.|409.339 - Priority subject to subordination.

409.339  Priority subject to subordination. This chapter does not preclude subordination by agreement by a person entitled to priority.History:  2001 a. 10.
WI Stat § 409.340 (2021)
2021 Wisconsin Statutes & Annotations|Chapter 409 - Uniform commercial code — secured transactions.|409.340 - Effectiveness of right of recoupment or setoff against deposit account.

409.340  Effectiveness of right of recoupment or setoff against deposit account. (1) Exercise of recoupment or setoff. Except as otherwise provided in sub. (3), a bank with which a deposit account is maintained may exercise any right of recoupment or setoff against a secured party that holds a security interest in the deposit account. (2)  Recoupment or setoff not affected by security interest. Except as otherwise provided in sub. (3), the application of this chapter to a security interest in a deposit account does not affect a right of recoupment or setoff of the secured party as to a deposit account maintained with the secured party. (3)  When setoff ineffective. The exercise by a bank of a setoff against a deposit account is ineffective against a secured party that holds a security interest in the deposit account which is perfected by control under s. 409.104 (1) (c), if the setoff is based on a claim against the debtor.History:  2001 a. 10.
WI Stat § 409.341 (2021)
2021 Wisconsin Statutes & Annotations|Chapter 409 - Uniform commercial code — secured transactions.|409.341 - Bank's rights and duties with respect to deposit account.

409.341  Bank's rights and duties with respect to deposit account. Except as otherwise provided in s. 409.340 (3), and unless the bank otherwise agrees in an authenticated record, a bank's rights and duties with respect to a deposit account maintained with the bank are not terminated, suspended, or modified by: (1) The creation, attachment, or perfection of a security interest in the deposit account; (2) The bank's knowledge of the security interest; or (3) The bank's receipt of instructions from the secured party.History:  2001 a. 10.
WI Stat § 409.342 (2021)
2021 Wisconsin Statutes & Annotations|Chapter 409 - Uniform commercial code — secured transactions.|409.342 - Bank's right to refuse to enter into or disclose existence of control agreement.

409.342  Bank's right to refuse to enter into or disclose existence of control agreement. This chapter does not require a bank to enter into an agreement of the kind described in s. 409.104 (1) (b), even if its customer so requests or directs. A bank that has entered into such an agreement is not required to confirm the existence of the agreement to another person unless requested to do so by its customer.History:  2001 a. 10.
WI Stat § 409.401 (2021)
2021 Wisconsin Statutes & Annotations|Chapter 409 - Uniform commercial code — secured transactions.|409.401 - Alienability of debtor's rights.

409.401  Alienability of debtor's rights. (1) Other law governs alienability; exceptions. Except as otherwise provided in sub. (2) and ss. 409.406, 409.407, 409.408, and 409.409, whether a debtor's rights in collateral may be voluntarily or involuntarily transferred is governed by law other than this chapter. (2)  Agreement does not prevent transfer. An agreement between the debtor and secured party which prohibits a transfer of the debtor's rights in collateral or makes the transfer a default does not prevent the transfer from taking effect.History:  2001 a. 10.If a security agreement does not explicitly provide that transfer of collateral constitutes default and the secured party is not entitled to immediate possession, sale of collateral is not a conversion. Production Credit Association of Chippewa Falls v. Equity Coop Livestock, 82 Wis. 2d 5, 261 N.W.2d 127 (1978).A condition imposed by a secured party on authorization to sell collateral is ineffective unless performance of the condition is within the buyer's control. Production Credit AssociatIon of Madison v. Nowatzski, 90 Wis. 2d 344, 280 N.W.2d 118 (1979).NOTE:  The above annotated materials cite to the pre-2001 Wis. Act 10 version of ch. 409.
WI Stat § 409.402 (2021)
2021 Wisconsin Statutes & Annotations|Chapter 409 - Uniform commercial code — secured transactions.|409.402 - Secured party not obligated on contract of debtor or in tort.

409.402  Secured party not obligated on contract of debtor or in tort. The existence of a security interest, agricultural lien, or authority given to a debtor to dispose of or use collateral, without more, does not subject a secured party to liability in contract or tort for the debtor's acts or omissions.History:  2001 a. 10.
WI Stat § 409.403 (2021)
2021 Wisconsin Statutes & Annotations|Chapter 409 - Uniform commercial code — secured transactions.|409.403 - Agreement not to assert defenses against assignee.

409.403  Agreement not to assert defenses against assignee. (1) Value. In this section, “value" has the meaning provided in s. 403.303 (1). (2)  Agreement not to assert claim or defense. Except as otherwise provided in this section, an agreement between an account debtor and an assignor not to assert against an assignee any claim or defense that the account debtor may have against the assignor is enforceable by an assignee that takes an assignment:(a) For value;(b) In good faith;(c) Without notice of a claim of a property or possessory right to the property assigned; and(d) Without notice of a defense or claim in recoupment of the type that may be asserted against a person entitled to enforce a negotiable instrument under s. 403.305 (1). (3)  When sub. (2) not applicable. Subsection (2) does not apply to defenses of a type that may be asserted against a holder in due course of a negotiable instrument under s. 403.305 (2). (4)  Omission of required statement in consumer transaction. In a consumer transaction, if a record evidences the account debtor's obligation, law other than this chapter requires that the record include a statement to the effect that the rights of an assignee are subject to claims or defenses that the account debtor could assert against the original obligee, and the record does not include such a statement:(a) The record has the same effect as if the record had included such a statement; and(b) The account debtor may assert against an assignee those claims and defenses that would have been available if the record had included such a statement. (5)  Rule for individual under other law. This section is subject to law other than this chapter which establishes a different rule for an account debtor who is an individual and who incurred the obligation primarily for personal, family, or household purposes. (6)  Other law not displaced. Except as otherwise provided in sub. (4), this section does not displace law other than this chapter which gives effect to an agreement by an account debtor not to assert a claim or defense against an assignee.History:  2001 a. 10.