CO Code § 14-5-305 (2021)
2021 Colorado Code|Title 14 - Domestic Matters|Article 5 - Uniform Interstate Family Support Act|Part 3 - Civil Provisions of General Application|§ 14-5-305. Duties and Powers of Responding Tribunal

  When a responding tribunal of this state receives a petition or comparable pleading from an initiating tribunal or directly pursuant to section 14-5-301 (b), it shall cause the petition or pleading to be filed and notify the petitioner where and when it was filed.    A responding tribunal of this state, to the extent not prohibited by other law, may do one or more of the following:   Establish or enforce a support order, modify a child support order, determine the controlling child support order, or determine parentage of a child;    Order an obligor to comply with a support order, specifying the amount and the manner of compliance;    Order income withholding;    Determine the amount of any arrearages, and specify a method of payment;    Enforce orders by civil or criminal contempt, or both;    Set aside property for satisfaction of the support order;    Place liens and order execution on the obligor's property;    Order an obligor to keep the tribunal informed of the obligor's current residential address, electronic-mail address, telephone number, employer, address of employment, and telephone number at the place of employment;    Issue a bench warrant for an obligor who has failed after proper notice to appear at a hearing ordered by the tribunal and enter the bench warrant in any local and state computer systems for criminal warrants;    Order the obligor to seek appropriate employment by specified methods;    Award reasonable attorney's fees and other fees and costs; and    Grant any other available remedy.       A responding tribunal of this state shall include in a support order issued under this article, or in the documents accompanying the order, the calculations on which the support order is based.    A responding tribunal of this state may not condition the payment of a support order issued under this article upon compliance by a party with provisions for visitation.    If a responding tribunal of this state issues an order under this article, the tribunal shall send a copy of the order to the petitioner and the respondent and to the initiating tribunal, if any.    If requested to enforce a support order, arrears, or judgment or modify a support order stated in a foreign currency, a responding tribunal of this state shall convert the amount stated in the foreign currency to the equivalent amount in dollars under the applicable official or market exchange rate as publicly reported.     History. Source: L. 93: Entire article R&RE, p. 1589, § 1, effective January 1, 1995. L. 97: (a) and (e) amended, p. 537, § 7, effective July 1. L. 2003: (a), IP(b), and (b)(1) amended and (f) added, p. 1251, § 14, effective July 1, 2004. L. 2015: (b)(1) and (b)(8) amended,(HB 15-1198), ch. 173, p. 550, § 16, effective July 1.    Editor's note:   This section is similar to former §§ 14-5-119 , 14-5-120 , and 14-5-127 as they existed prior to 1993.   COMMENT   This section establishes a wide variety of duties for a responding tribunal. It contains: ministerial functions, subsection (a); judicial functions, subsection (b); and, substantive rules applicable to interstate cases, subsections (c)-(e). Because a responding tribunal may be an administrative agency rather than a court, the act explicitly states that a tribunal is not granted powers that it does not otherwise possess under state law. For example, authority to enforce a support order by contempt generally is limited to courts.   Subsection (a) directs the filing of the documents received without regard to whether an initiating tribunal in another state was involved in forwarding the documentation. It also directs that the individual or entity requesting the filing be notified, but leaves the means of that notification to local law. The advent of a variety of swifter, and perhaps even more reliable, forms of notice in the modern era justifies the deletion of a particular form of notice. For example, many states now authorize notice by telephone facsimile (FAX), or by an express delivery service, and many legal documents are transmitted by electronic mail (email).   Subsection (b) lists duties that, if possessed under state law in connection with intrastate cases, are extended to the responding tribunal in UIFSA cases. Thus, each subdivision purposefully avoids mention of substantive rules. For example, subsection (b)(7) does not identify the type, nature, or priority of liens that may be issued under UIFSA. As is generally true under the act, those details will be determined by applicable state law concerning support enforcement remedies of local orders.   Subsection (c) clarifies that the details of calculating the child-support order are to be included along with the order. Local law generally requires that variation from the child support guidelines must be explained, 42 U.S.C. § 667; this requirement is extended to interstate cases.  see  Subsection (d) states that an interstate support order may not be conditioned on compliance with a visitation order. While this may be at variance with state law governing intrastate cases, under a UIFSA proceeding the petitioner generally is not present before the tribunal. This distinction justifies prohibiting visitation issues from being litigated in the context of a support proceeding. All states have enacted some version of either the UCCJA or the UCCJEA providing for resolution of visitation issues in interstate cases.   Subsection (e) introduces the policy determination that the petitioner, the respondent, and the initiating tribunal, if any, shall be kept informed about actions taken by the responding tribunal.   Subsection (f) is designed to facilitate enforcement of a foreign support order. Note that the language directing a conversion to a monetary equivalence in dollars is intended to make clear the equivalence is not a modification of the original order to an absolute dollar figure; rather, satisfaction of the obligation is to be determined by the order-issuing tribunal based on the present dollar value of the currency in which the order is denominated.   Related to Convention: art. 19. Scope of the Chapter; art. 34. Enforcement measures; art. 35. Transfer of funds; art. 43. Recovery of costs.   ANNOTATION   Reference to the Uniform Parentage Act in the Colorado Uniform Interstate Family Support Act simply establishes a method to determine parentage. Therefore the trial court erred in concluding that it had jurisdiction to enter orders granting parenting time. In Interest of R.L.H., 942 P.2d 1386 (Colo. App. 1997).   An order requiring one party to repay or reimburse the other party for overpaid child support qualifies as a “reimbursement”, thus district court had subject matter jurisdiction to issue an order regarding overpayments. In re Haddad, 93 P.3d 617 (Colo. App. 2004).