reglab/housing_qa huggingface dataset:
SD Codified L § 16-21A-5 (2021)
2021 South Dakota Codified Laws|Title 16 - Courts and Judiciary|Chapter 21A - Circuit Court Electronic Filing Rules|Section 16-21A-5 - Confidentiality--Sealed documents.

16-21A-5. Confidentiality--Sealed documents.(1) A party electronically filing a document that is not accessible to the public in whole or in part is responsible for redaction or designating the document as confidential or sealed before transmitting it to the court. For any redacted document a sealed version of the original unredacted document should also be filed electronically.(2) In documents prepared for filing with the court, information that would otherwise be included in the document but required by §15-15A-9 not to be disclosed in court documents must be separately filed on a Confidential Information Form and may be included in those documents only by reference.(3) It is the responsibility of the parties to seek advance approval from the court for submitting a document as sealed or confidential if that document is not already declared confidential or sealed by existing law, court rules or order. The title of a sealed or confidential document will appear on any electronic register of actions for the case. Source: SL 2014, ch 254 (Supreme Court Rule 13-12), eff. July 1, 2014.
SD Codified L § 16-21A-6 (2021)
2021 South Dakota Codified Laws|Title 16 - Courts and Judiciary|Chapter 21A - Circuit Court Electronic Filing Rules|Section 16-21A-6 - Retention.

16-21A-6. Retention.A registered attorney electronically filing or serving a document, or any person filing a petition for mental illness commitment, is deemed to represent that the document so filed or served is a true and correct copy of the original. The original, if in hardcopy form, shall be maintained by the filing attorney or person filing a mental illness commitment for 120 days after the date of electronic filing or service, whichever is later. Self-represented litigants electronically filing or serving a document shall maintain the original document in hardcopy form for two years after the date of electronic filing and service, whichever is later. Both attorneys and self-represented litigants shall make the original document available upon request of the court, the signatories, or other parties during the required retention period. In the event of a failure to comply with this provision the court may make such orders in regard to the failure as are appropriate under the circumstances including, but not limited to, the following: order that the electronic document be considered the original document for all purposes; prohibit the party from introducing designated matters in evidence as a result of the failure to comply; strike any relevant pleadings or parts thereof; stay further proceedings until the order is obeyed; dismiss the action or proceeding or any part thereof; order the party to pay reasonable expenses, including attorney's fees, caused by the failure as the court may determine appropriate. In lieu of any of the foregoing, or in addition thereto, the court may treat such failure as a contempt of court. Source: SL 2014, ch 254 (Supreme Court Rule 13-12), eff. July 1, 2014.
SD Codified L § 16-21A-7 (2021)
2021 South Dakota Codified Laws|Title 16 - Courts and Judiciary|Chapter 21A - Circuit Court Electronic Filing Rules|Section 16-21A-7 - Electronic service.

16-21A-7. Electronic service.(1) A party who files a document electronically must serve the document by electronic means if the recipient consents to accept documents served electronically. All documents filed electronically must be served electronically through the Odyssey7 system except for documents served on or by self-represented litigants. On a showing of good cause, an attorney may be granted leave of court to serve paper documents or to be exempt from receiving electronic service.(2) Electronic service is not effective if the party making service learns that the attempted service did not reach the person to be served.(3) After July 1, 2014, any party not exempt from electronic filing must designate an e-mail address for accepting electronic service and for receiving electronic service through the electronic filing system.(4) The court may electronically file and serve on registered attorneys and parties any judgments, orders, notices or other documents prepared by the court in such cases provided the attorney or party to be served has designated an e-mail address for receiving electronic service. Source: SL 2014, ch 254 (Supreme Court Rule 13-12), eff. July 1, 2014.
SD Codified L § 16-21A-8 (2021)
2021 South Dakota Codified Laws|Title 16 - Courts and Judiciary|Chapter 21A - Circuit Court Electronic Filing Rules|Section 16-21A-8 - Original documents.

16-21A-8. Original documents.An original document submitted for filing in paper form may be scanned by the clerk of court and destroyed after thirty days. A party may request the return of any original document filed with the clerk of court by submitting a document request return form with the document when it is delivered for filing along with a self-addressed stamped envelope. See Appendix "Document Return Request Form." Source: SL 2014, ch 254 (Supreme Court Rule 13-12), eff. July 1, 2014.
SD Codified L § 16-21A-9 (2021)
2021 South Dakota Codified Laws|Title 16 - Courts and Judiciary|Chapter 21A - Circuit Court Electronic Filing Rules|Section 16-21A-9 - Technical issues--Relief.

16-21A-9. Technical issues--Relief.On a showing of good cause, the court may grant appropriate relief if electronic filing or electronic service was not completed due to technical problems. Source: SL 2014, ch 254 (Supreme Court Rule 13-12), eff. July 1, 2014.
SD Codified L § 16-21A-10 (2021)
2021 South Dakota Codified Laws|Title 16 - Courts and Judiciary|Chapter 21A - Circuit Court Electronic Filing Rules|Section 16-21A-10 - Scope.

16-21A-10. Scope.Unless specifically provided otherwise in this rule or inconsistent with its provisions, the Rules of Civil and Criminal Procedure shall govern electronic filings. Source: SL 2014, ch 254 (Supreme Court Rule 13-12), eff. July 1, 2014.
SD Codified L § A (2021)
2021 South Dakota Codified Laws|Title 16 - Courts and Judiciary|Chapter 21A - Circuit Court Electronic Filing Rules|Appendix A - Appendix

  APPENDIX TO CHAPTER 16-21A    DOCUMENT RETURN REQUEST FORM    STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA,   )   In Circuit Court     ) County of ___________________   )   _______________ Judicial Circuit   A. B.,     )      Plaintiff   )        vs.     )   DOCUMENT RETURN C. D.,     )   REQUEST   Defendant   )    I am requesting that the following document(s) submitted for scanning or as a trial exhibit in the above-named case be returned: List documents to be returned _____ I request that the document(s) be returned by mail and have enclosed a self-addressed stamped envelope. _____ I will pick up the document(s) on __________. Dated ____________________ Signed: ____________________ Party or Party's Attorney of Record Address: ____________________ RETURN RECEIPT Received document(s) this ____ day of __________, __________. Signed: ____________________   Source: SL 2014, ch 254 (Supreme Court Rule 13-12), eff. July 1, 2014.
SD Codified L § 16-22-2 (2021)
2021 South Dakota Codified Laws|Title 16 - Courts and Judiciary|Chapter 22 - Public Safety Improvement Programs|Section 16-22-2 - Drug court advisory council.

16-22-2. Drug court advisory council.The Chief Justice shall establish an advisory council to address the operational, coordination, resource, information management, and evaluation needs of the drug courts. Source: SL 2013, ch 101, §2.
SD Codified L § 16-22-3 (2021)
2021 South Dakota Codified Laws|Title 16 - Courts and Judiciary|Chapter 22 - Public Safety Improvement Programs|Section 16-22-3 - Drug court defined.

16-22-3. Drug court defined.For the purposes of this chapter, a drug court is a court supervised alternative to incarceration and includes drug, driving under influence, and other specialty court dockets aimed at increasing offender accountability and decreasing recidivism. Source: SL 2013, ch 101, §3.
SD Codified L § 16-22-4 (2021)
2021 South Dakota Codified Laws|Title 16 - Courts and Judiciary|Chapter 22 - Public Safety Improvement Programs|Section 16-22-4 - Drug court program.

16-22-4. Drug court program.The Supreme Court may establish a drug court program in any court that has jurisdiction over criminal cases. Source: SL 2013, ch 101, §4.
SD Codified L § 16-22-5 (2021)
2021 South Dakota Codified Laws|Title 16 - Courts and Judiciary|Chapter 22 - Public Safety Improvement Programs|Section 16-22-5 - Promulgation of drug court rules.

16-22-5. Promulgation of drug court rules.The Supreme Court shall establish rules pursuant to §16-3-1 for the eligibility criteria for participation in a drug court. No offender participating in a drug court is entitled to earned discharge on probation pursuant to §16-22-17. Source: SL 2013, ch 101, §5.
SD Codified L § 16-22-5.1 (2021)
2021 South Dakota Codified Laws|Title 16 - Courts and Judiciary|Chapter 22 - Public Safety Improvement Programs|Section 16-22-5.1 - Key components for drug courts.

16-22-5.1. Key components for drug courts.South Dakota drug courts shall adhere to the following ten key components in order to maintain the fidelity and preserve the structural integrity of such programs:Key Component 1: Drug courts integrate alcohol and other drug treatment services with justice system case processing.Key Component 2: Using a non-adversarial approach, prosecution and defense counsel promote public safety while protecting participants' due process rights.Key Component 3: Eligible participants are identified early and promptly placed in the drug court program.Key Component 4: Drug courts provide access to a continuum of alcohol and other drug related treatment and rehabilitation services.Key Component 5: Abstinence is monitored by frequent alcohol and other drug testing.Key Component 6: A coordinated strategy governs drug court responses to participants' compliance.Key Component 7: Ongoing judicial interaction with each drug court participant is essential.Key Component 8: Monitoring and evaluation measure the achievement of program goals and gauge effectiveness.Key component 9: Continuing interdisciplinary education promotes effective drug court planning, implementation, and operations.Key Component 10: Forging partnerships among drug courts, public agencies, and community-based organizations generates local support and enhances drug court effectiveness. Source: SL 2014, ch 255 (Supreme Court Rule 13-13, §2), eff. Jan. 1, 2014.
SD Codified L § 16-22-5.2 (2021)
2021 South Dakota Codified Laws|Title 16 - Courts and Judiciary|Chapter 22 - Public Safety Improvement Programs|Section 16-22-5.2 - Standards and guidelines in accordance with key components.

16-22-5.2. Standards and guidelines in accordance with key components.The State Court Administrator's Office, in consultation with the Statewide Drug Court Advisory Board, shall implement statewide standards and guidelines in accordance with the ten key components to ensure the effectiveness and maintain the fidelity of the drug courts. Source: SL 2014, ch 255 (Supreme Court Rule 13-13, §3), eff. Jan. 1, 2014.
SD Codified L § 16-22-5.3 (2021)
2021 South Dakota Codified Laws|Title 16 - Courts and Judiciary|Chapter 22 - Public Safety Improvement Programs|Section 16-22-5.3 - Standards in accordance with best practices publication.

16-22-5.3. Standards in accordance with best practices publication.The State Court Administrator's Office, in consultation with the Statewide Drug Court Advisory Board, shall implement statewide standards in accordance with "Adult Drug Court Best Practice Standards," published by the National Association of Drug Court Professionals. Source: SL 2014, ch 255 (Supreme Court Rule 13-13, §4), eff. Jan. 1, 2014.
SD Codified L § 16-22-6 (2021)
2021 South Dakota Codified Laws|Title 16 - Courts and Judiciary|Chapter 22 - Public Safety Improvement Programs|Section 16-22-6 - Admissibility of drug court participant's statements and reports in legal proceedings.

16-22-6. Admissibility of drug court participant's statements and reports in legal proceedings.Nothing contained in this section may be construed to permit a judge to impose, modify, or reduce a sentence below the minimum sentence required by law. No statement made by a drug court participant in connection with the court's program or directives, nor any report made by the staff of the court or program connected to the court, regarding a participant's use of controlled substances is admissible as evidence against the participant in any legal proceeding or prosecution. However, if the participant violates the conditions or is terminated from drug court, the reasons for the violation or termination may be considered in sanctioning, sentencing, or otherwise disposing of the participant's case. Source: SL 2013, ch 101, §6.
SD Codified L § 16-22-6.1 (2021)
2021 South Dakota Codified Laws|Title 16 - Courts and Judiciary|Chapter 22 - Public Safety Improvement Programs|Section 16-22-6.1 - Drug court sanctions.

16-22-6.1. Drug court sanctions.For any person admitted to a drug court, as defined in §16-22-3, a sanction may include the imposition of jail time and this sanction may be imposed irrespective of §23A-27-18.1. However, any jail term shall be credited toward any incarceration imposed upon a subsequent revocation of a suspended execution of sentence. The Supreme Court shall promulgate rules, pursuant to chapter 16-3, defining the best practices for drug court sanctions. Source: SL 2015, ch 119, §1.
SD Codified L § 16-22-7 (2021)
2021 South Dakota Codified Laws|Title 16 - Courts and Judiciary|Chapter 22 - Public Safety Improvement Programs|Section 16-22-7 - Semiannual drug court performance report.

16-22-7. Semiannual drug court performance report.The Unified Judicial System shall semiannually report performance measures on drug courts to the oversight council. Source: SL 2013, ch 101, §7.
SD Codified L § 16-22-8 (2021)
2021 South Dakota Codified Laws|Title 16 - Courts and Judiciary|Chapter 22 - Public Safety Improvement Programs|Section 16-22-8 - HOPE probation programs.

16-22-8. HOPE probation programs.The Supreme Court is authorized to establish South Dakota HOPE probation programs in any court that has jurisdiction over criminal cases. Source: SL 2013, ch 101, §9, eff. Jan. 1, 2014; SL 2016, ch 113, §1.
SD Codified L § 16-22-8.1 (2021)
2021 South Dakota Codified Laws|Title 16 - Courts and Judiciary|Chapter 22 - Public Safety Improvement Programs|Section 16-22-8.1 - Assignment of magistrate judge to preside over HOPE probation program.

16-22-8.1. Assignment of magistrate judge to preside over HOPE probation program.Any magistrate court with a magistrate judge presiding may, upon assignment of the presiding judge of the circuit, act in lieu of a circuit court judge having jurisdiction to administer and preside over a HOPE probation program established under §16-22-8. Source: SL 2018, ch 127, §1, eff. Feb. 28, 2018.
SD Codified L § 16-22-9 (2021)
2021 South Dakota Codified Laws|Title 16 - Courts and Judiciary|Chapter 22 - Public Safety Improvement Programs|Section 16-22-9 - Promulgation of HOPE probation program rules.

16-22-9. Promulgation of HOPE probation program rules.The Supreme Court shall establish rules pursuant to §16-3-1 for the programs consistent with the following components, modeled after the national HOPE court initiative:(1)Involvement and commitment of criminal justice officials including judges, state's attorneys, defense attorneys, law enforcement, court services officers, and treatment providers;(2)Eligibility criteria focused on offenders with a high risk to reoffend, without consideration of the current offense;(3)Judicial involvement in setting and communicating to the probationer program expectations and consequences for noncompliance;(4)Frequent, effective, and randomized drug and or alcohol testing;(5)Swift, certain, and proportional sanctions for noncompliance with program conditions;(6)Swift and certain warrant service for absconding; and(7)Compilation, evaluation, and publicly reported program results. Source: SL 2013, ch 101, §10, eff. Jan. 1, 2014; SL 2016, ch 113, §2.
SD Codified L § 16-22-10 (2021)
2021 South Dakota Codified Laws|Title 16 - Courts and Judiciary|Chapter 22 - Public Safety Improvement Programs|Section 16-22-10 - Evaluation of program impact on public safety.

16-22-10. Evaluation of program impact on public safety.Each program shall be evaluated for the impact on public safety outcomes. The Unified Judicial System shall report performance measures for the programs semiannually to the oversight council. Source: SL 2013, ch 101, §11, eff. Jan. 1, 2014; SL 2016, ch 113, §3.
SD Codified L § 16-22-11 (2021)
2021 South Dakota Codified Laws|Title 16 - Courts and Judiciary|Chapter 22 - Public Safety Improvement Programs|Section 16-22-11 - Promulgation of rules governing evidence-based felony probation supervision practices.

16-22-11. Promulgation of rules governing evidence-based felony probation supervision practices.The Supreme Court shall establish rules pursuant to §16-3-1 governing evidence-based felony probation supervision practices, including a validated risk and needs assessment, and targeting the probationer's criminal risk factors with suitable supervision and intervention, focusing resources on moderate-risk and high-risk offenders. Source: SL 2013, ch 101, §14, eff. Oct. 1, 2013.
SD Codified L § 16-22-12 (2021)
2021 South Dakota Codified Laws|Title 16 - Courts and Judiciary|Chapter 22 - Public Safety Improvement Programs|Section 16-22-12 - Report of probation practices and training implementation.

16-22-12. Report of probation practices and training implementation.The Unified Judicial System shall monitor and report semiannually to the oversight council the extent to which practices of probation supervision, as adopted in rule by the Supreme Court, as well as training requirements prescribed in §§16-22-15 and 16-14-4 are implemented. Source: SL 2013, ch 101, §15, eff. Oct. 1, 2013.
SD Codified L § 16-22-13 (2021)
2021 South Dakota Codified Laws|Title 16 - Courts and Judiciary|Chapter 22 - Public Safety Improvement Programs|Section 16-22-13 - Promulgation of rules regarding graduated sanctions program.

16-22-13. Promulgation of rules regarding graduated sanctions program.The Supreme Court shall establish rules pursuant to §16-3-1 to develop a graduated sanctions procedure and grid to guide court services officers in determining the appropriate response to a violation of conditions of probation. The graduated sanctions program shall use short jail stays as the most severe sanction within the grid, shall collect data related to the use of sanctions and their outcomes, and shall include a process for reviewing sanctions that are challenged by the probationer. The rules shall vest statewide oversight of graduated sanctions procedure, use, and data collection with the State Court Administrator's Office.The system of graduated sanctions shall be created with the following objectives:(1)Responding to violations of probation quickly, consistently and proportionally, based on the nature of the violation and the risk level of the probationer;(2)Reducing the time and resources expended by the court to respond to violations; and(3)Reducing the commission of new crimes and revocation rates. Source: SL 2013, ch 101, §16, eff. Oct. 1, 2013.
SD Codified L § 16-22-14 (2021)
2021 South Dakota Codified Laws|Title 16 - Courts and Judiciary|Chapter 22 - Public Safety Improvement Programs|Section 16-22-14 - Report of graduated sanctions.

16-22-14. Report of graduated sanctions.The State Court Administrator's Office shall report semiannually to the oversight council the number and percentage of probationers who received a graduated sanction. Source: SL 2013, ch 101, §17, eff. Oct. 1, 2013.
SD Codified L § 16-22-15 (2021)
2021 South Dakota Codified Laws|Title 16 - Courts and Judiciary|Chapter 22 - Public Safety Improvement Programs|Section 16-22-15 - Evidence-based practices training.

16-22-15. Evidence-based practices training.Any person who exercises supervision over a probationer pursuant to §23A-27-12.1 or provides intervention services to any probationer shall receive sufficient training on evidence-based practices, how to target criminal risk factors to reduce recidivism, recognizing the signs and symptoms of mental health problems, and defusing mental health crises. Source: SL 2013, ch 101, §18, eff. Oct. 1, 2013; SL 2017, ch 109, §29.
SD Codified L § 16-22-16 (2021)
2021 South Dakota Codified Laws|Title 16 - Courts and Judiciary|Chapter 22 - Public Safety Improvement Programs|Section 16-22-16 - Case history and risk and needs assessment of probationer.

16-22-16. Case history and risk and needs assessment of probationer.If a probationer is sentenced to a term of imprisonment in the state penitentiary, the Unified Judicial System shall transfer the case history of the probationer including the results of a risk and needs assessment conducted on the probationer to the Department of Corrections. Source: SL 2013, ch 101, §19, eff. Oct. 1, 2013.
SD Codified L § 16-22-17 (2021)
2021 South Dakota Codified Laws|Title 16 - Courts and Judiciary|Chapter 22 - Public Safety Improvement Programs|Section 16-22-17 - Promulgation of rules regarding earned discharge credits.

16-22-17. Promulgation of rules regarding earned discharge credits.The Supreme Court shall establish rules pursuant to §16-3-1 for the criteria and procedure for earning and awarding earned credits for discharge from probation. Source: SL 2013, ch 101, §22.
SD Codified L § 16-22-18 (2021)
2021 South Dakota Codified Laws|Title 16 - Courts and Judiciary|Chapter 22 - Public Safety Improvement Programs|Section 16-22-18 - Award of earned discharge credits.

16-22-18. Award of earned discharge credits.The State Court Administrator's Office shall oversee the award of earned discharge credits of at least fifteen days for each month a probationer is in compliance with the terms and conditions of supervision. Source: SL 2013, ch 101, §23.
SD Codified L § 16-22-19 (2021)
2021 South Dakota Codified Laws|Title 16 - Courts and Judiciary|Chapter 22 - Public Safety Improvement Programs|Section 16-22-19 - Eligibility for earned discharge.

16-22-19. Eligibility for earned discharge.Each offender placed on felony probation for a term of at least six months, except an offender placed on probation for a conviction of a sex offense as defined in §22-24B-1, or a violation of sex offender registry requirements, or a violation of community safety zone requirements and who will serve time in the community under probation supervision, is eligible for earned discharge and completion of sentence under §16-22-18. Source: SL 2013, ch 101, §24.
SD Codified L § 16-22-20 (2021)
2021 South Dakota Codified Laws|Title 16 - Courts and Judiciary|Chapter 22 - Public Safety Improvement Programs|Section 16-22-20 - Report of earned discharge credits.

16-22-20. Report of earned discharge credits.The State Court Administrator's Office shall provide semiannually to the oversight council the number and percent of probationers who qualify for earned discharge credits and the average amount of credits earned by offenders. Source: SL 2013, ch 101, §25.
SD Codified L § 16-22-21 (2021)
2021 South Dakota Codified Laws|Title 16 - Courts and Judiciary|Chapter 22 - Public Safety Improvement Programs|Section 16-22-21 - Oversight council responsible for monitoring and reporting performance and outcome measures.

16-22-21. Oversight council responsible for monitoring and reporting performance and outcome measures.There is hereby established an oversight council responsible for monitoring and reporting performance and outcome measures related to the provisions set forth in this chapter. The Unified Judicial System shall provide staff support for the council. Source: SL 2013, ch 101, §67.