reglab/housing_qa huggingface dataset:
GA Code § 9-2-2 (2021)
2021 Georgia Code|Title 9 - Civil Practice|Chapter 2 - Actions Generally|Article 1 - General Provisions|§ 9-2-2. Actions in Personam; Actions in Rem

  An action may be against the person, or against property, or both.   Generally, a proceeding against the person shall bind the property also. A proceeding against property without service on the person shall bind only the particular property.    (Orig. Code 1863, § 3176; Code 1868, § 3187; Code 1873, § 3252; Code 1882, § 3252; Civil Code 1895, § 4931; Civil Code 1910, § 5508; Code 1933, § 3-104; Ga. L. 1982, p. 3, § 9.)   RESEARCH REFERENCES   Am. Jur. 2d.   - 1 Am. Jur. 2d, Actions, § 33 et seq.   C.J.S.   - 1A C.J.S., Actions, § 87.
GA Code § 9-2-6 (2021)
2021 Georgia Code|Title 9 - Civil Practice|Chapter 2 - Actions Generally|Article 1 - General Provisions|§ 9-2-6. Demand Prior to Action Not Necessary

 No demand shall be necessary before the commencement of an action, except in such cases as the law or the contract prescribes.   (Orig. Code 1863, § 3179; Code 1868, § 3190; Code 1873, § 3255; Code 1882, § 3255; Civil Code 1895, § 4935; Civil Code 1910, § 5512; Code 1933, § 3-106.)   RESEARCH REFERENCES   Am. Jur. 2d.   - 1 Am. Jur. 2d, Actions, §§ 77 et seq., 82.   C.J.S.   - 1A C.J.S., Actions, § 66.   ALR.    - Commencement of action as compliance with or substitute for statutory notice as condition of action for injury to person or property, 101 A.L.R. 726.    Effect of failure before commencing action to obtain leave under statute providing that no action shall be brought upon a judgment without leave of court or judge, 160 A.L.R. 605.
GA Code § 9-2-8 (2021)
2021 Georgia Code|Title 9 - Civil Practice|Chapter 2 - Actions Generally|Article 1 - General Provisions|§ 9-2-8. Private Rights of Action Not Created Unless Expressly Stated

  No private right of action shall arise from any Act enacted after July 1, 2010, unless such right is expressly provided therein.   Nothing in subsection (a) of this Code section shall be construed to prevent the breach of any duty imposed by law from being used as the basis for a cause of action under any theory of recovery otherwise recognized by law, including, but not limited to, theories of recovery under the law of torts or contract or for breach of legal or private duties as set forth in Code Sections 51-1-6 and 51-1-8 or in Title 13.     (Code 1981, §9-2-8, enacted by Ga. L. 2010, p. 745, § 2/SB 138.)   Code Commission notes.   - Pursuant to Code Section 28-9-5, in 2010, "after July 1, 2010," was substituted for "after the effective date of this Code section" in subsection (a).   Editor's notes.   - Ga. L. 2010, p. 745, § 1, not codified by the General Assembly, provides that: "This Act shall be known and may be cited as the 'Transparency in Lawsuits Protection Act.'"   Law reviews.   - For annual survey of law on trial practice and procedure, see 62 Mercer L. Rev. 339 (2010).   JUDICIAL DECISIONS   No private right of action for transmitting nude photos.    - Trial court erred in awarding civil damages to a girlfriend under O.C.G.A. § 16-11-90, which criminalized the transmission of photography or video depicting nudity or sexually explicit conduct of an adult without his or her consent, because it was a criminal statute that did not provide for a private right of action; further, creation of such a right from the statute would violate the separation of powers clause, Ga. Const. 1983, Art. I, Sec. II, Para. III, and also O.C.G.A. § 9-2-8(a). Somerville v. White, 337 Ga. App. 414, 787 S.E.2d 350 (2016).
GA Code § 9-2-22 (2021)
2021 Georgia Code|Title 9 - Civil Practice|Chapter 2 - Actions Generally|Article 2 - Parties|§ 9-2-22. Joinder of Defendants in Action for Deficiencies in Construction

 In any action arising out of alleged deficiencies in the construction of improvements on real property, the party plaintiff may join in one action, as parties defendants, all parties who allegedly contributed in the construction of the improvements as well as all bonding companies who bonded the performance of the parties defendant.   (Code 1933, § 3-110.1, enacted by Ga. L. 1964, p. 140, § 1.)   RESEARCH REFERENCES   Am. Jur. 2d.   - 59 Am. Jur. 2d, Parties, §§ 124 et seq., 144, 152, 157 et seq.   C.J.S.   - 1A C.J.S., Actions, §§ 135, 149, 151; 67A C.J.S., Parties, § 41 et seq.   ALR.    - Purchase of mortgaged property by mortgagee as affecting liability on bond conditioned for improvement of property or other obligation collateral to mortgage and mortgage debt, 82 A.L.R. 762.
GA Code § 9-2-23 (2021)
2021 Georgia Code|Title 9 - Civil Practice|Chapter 2 - Actions Generally|Article 2 - Parties|§ 9-2-23. Separate Action by Tenant in Common

 A tenant in common may bring an action separately for his own interest, and the judgment in such case shall affect only himself.   (Orig. Code 1863, § 3183; Code 1868, § 3194; Code 1873, § 3259; Code 1882, § 3259; Civil Code 1895, § 4941; Civil Code 1910, § 5518; Code 1933, § 3-111.)   Cross references.   - Tenancy in common generally, § 44-6-120 et seq.   JUDICIAL DECISIONS    In action ensuing from filing of distress warrant, it was immaterial whether premises were leased to defendant lessee by lessors separately or as a partnership, since in either event lessors would be tenants in common of the property and thus subject to the express provisions of this section. Wisteria Garden Restaurant, Inc. v. Tuntas Co., 114 Ga. App. 165, 150 S.E.2d 460 (1966).   Action by assignee of tenant in common.    - Under agreement between two former partners, in course of dissolution of partnership and division of assets remaining after payment of all indebtedness, that claim for personalty against third party would be divided equally between them, partners thereafter became tenants in common, insofar as their claim for such personalty was concerned, and it was therefore permissible for assignee of claim of one of such cotenants to sue in trover for the recovery of one-half undivided share of such property without joining the other cotenant and without suing in the name of the dissolved partnership. Graham v. Raines, 83 Ga. App. 581, 64 S.E.2d 98 (1951).   Separate action by tenants in common.    - Since deed grantor's action to set aside and cancel warranty deed that the deed grantor conveyed to the deed grantees was severable as to the deed grantor's interest in the property that the deed grantor held as a joint tenant with the deed grantor's spouse, the deed grantor could not toll the applicable statute of limitations for bringing the deed grantor's action as the deed grantor could not use the spouse's disability to toll the action that the deed grantor could have brought as to the deed grantor's own interest in the property. Pivic v. Pittard, 258 Ga. App. 675, 575 S.E.2d 4 (2002).    Cited in Butler v. Prudden, 182 Ga. 189, 185 S.E. 102 (1936); Keen v. Rodgers, 203 Ga. 578, 47 S.E.2d 567 (1948); Pugh v. Moore, 207 Ga. 453, 62 S.E.2d 153 (1950); Kitchens v. Jefferson County, 85 Ga. App. 902, 70 S.E.2d 527 (1952); Perkins v. First Nat'l Bank, 221 Ga. 82, 143 S.E.2d 474 (1965); Carroll v. Morrison, 116 Ga. App. 575, 158 S.E.2d 480 (1967); Paine v. Thomas, 228 Ga. 519, 186 S.E.2d 737 (1972).   RESEARCH REFERENCES   Am. Jur. 2d.   - 20 Am. Jur. 2d, Cotenancy and Joint Ownership, §§ 32 et seq., 100 et seq. 59 Am. Jur. 2d, Parties, § 128 et seq.   C.J.S.   - 86 C.J.S., Tenancy in Common, § 152 et seq. 67A C.J.S., Parties, § 41 et seq.   ALR.    - Homestead right of cotenant as affecting partition, 140 A.L.R. 1170.   Capacity of cotenant to maintain suit to set aside conveyance of interest of another cotenant because of fraud, undue influence, or incompetency, 7 A.L.R.2d 1317.
GA Code § 9-2-24 (2021)
2021 Georgia Code|Title 9 - Civil Practice|Chapter 2 - Actions Generally|Article 2 - Parties|§ 9-2-24. Action by Unincorporated Association

 An action may be maintained by and in the name of any unincorporated organization or association.   (Ga. L. 1959, p. 44, § 1.)   Cross references.   - Applicability of Code section to professional associations, § 14-10-17.   JUDICIAL DECISIONS   Capacity to bring suit.    - Unincorporated association of owners of property in a residential community had the capacity to bring an action against the operator of community recreational amenities and property owners' association; overruling Embassy Row Assoc. v. Rawlins, 162 Ga. App. 669, 292 S.E.2d 541 (1982). Fairfield Plantation Action Comm., Inc. v. Plantation Equity Group, Inc., 215 Ga. App. 746, 452 S.E.2d 147 (1994).    Cited in Smith v. UMW, 180 F. Supp. 796 (M.D. Ga. 1958); Massey v. Curry, 216 Ga. 22, 114 S.E.2d 416 (1960); Bethel Farm Bureau v. Anderson, 217 Ga. 529, 123 S.E.2d 754 (1962); Shaw v. Cousins Mtg. & Equity Invs., 142 Ga. App. 773, 236 S.E.2d 919 (1977); Equitable Life Assurance Soc'y v. Tinsley Mill Village, 249 Ga. 769, 294 S.E.2d 495 (1982).   OPINIONS OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL    Business trust is an association,  as opposed to a corporation. 1980 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 80-144.   RESEARCH REFERENCES   Am. Jur. 2d.   - 6 Am. Jur. 2d, Associations and Clubs, § 51 et seq. 59 Am. Jur. 2d, Parties, § 413.   16 Am. Jur. Pleading and Practice Forms, Labor and Labor Relations, § 2.   C.J.S.   - 7 C.J.S., Associations, § 85 et seq. 67A C.J.S., Parties, § 231.   ALR.    - Rights and remedies in respect of membership in, or establishment and maintenance of local post of, American Legion or other veterans' organization, 147 A.L.R. 590.   Right of labor union, or other organization for protection or promotion of interests of members, to challenge validity of statute or ordinance on behalf of members, 2 A.L.R.2d 917.   Joint venture's capacity to sue, 56 A.L.R.4th 1234.
GA Code § 9-2-26 (2021)
2021 Georgia Code|Title 9 - Civil Practice|Chapter 2 - Actions Generally|Article 2 - Parties|§ 9-2-26. Prosecution of Action Against Less Than All Joint Contractors or Copartners

 When two or more joint contractors, joint and several contractors, or copartners are defendants in the same action and service is perfected on one or more of the contractors or copartners and the officer serving the writ or process returns that the rest are not to be found, the plaintiff may proceed to judgment and execution against the defendants served with process in the same manner as if they were the sole defendants. If any of the defendants die pending the action, his representative may be made a party and the case may proceed to judgment and execution as in other cases against the representatives of deceased persons.   (Laws 1820, Cobb's 1851 Digest, p. 485; Code 1863, § 3263; Code 1868, § 3274; Code 1873, § 3350; Code 1882, § 3350; Civil Code 1895, § 5009; Civil Code 1910, § 5591; Code 1933, § 3-301.)   RESEARCH REFERENCES   Am. Jur. 2d.   - 59 Am. Jur. 2d, Parties, §§ 128 et seq., 149 et seq.   C.J.S.   - 67A C.J.S., Parties, §§ 55, 67 et seq., 76, 78, 86 et seq.   ALR.    - Judgment against less than all parties to contract as bar to action against others, 1 A.L.R. 1601.    Actions at law between partners and partnerships, 21 A.L.R. 21.    Release of one of several joint or joint and several contract obligors as affecting liability of other obligors, 53 A.L.R. 1420.    Payment by one of two or more joint and several debtors as suspending or tolling limitation, 71 A.L.R. 375; 74 A.L.R.2d 1287.    Right to judgment, levy, or lien against individual in action under statute permitting persons associated in business under a common name to be sued in that name, 100 A.L.R. 997.   Validity of exception for specific kind of tort action in survival statute, 77 A.L.R.3d 1349.
GA Code § 9-2-29 (2021)
2021 Georgia Code|Title 9 - Civil Practice|Chapter 2 - Actions Generally|Article 2 - Parties|§ 9-2-29. Plaintiff in Penal Action

 If no special officer is authorized to be the plaintiff in a penal action, the state, the Governor, the Attorney General, or a prosecuting attorney may be the plaintiff.   (Orig. Code 1863, § 3178; Code 1868, § 3189; Code 1873, § 3254; Code 1882, § 3254; Civil Code 1895, § 4933; Civil Code 1910, § 5510; Code 1933, § 3-103.)   Cross references.   - For corresponding provision relating to criminal procedure, § 17-1-2.   JUDICIAL DECISIONS   When informer may prosecute action.    - Qui tam action cannot be brought and prosecuted in name of informer unless a right thus to sue is distinctly given by statute. O'Kelly v. Athens Mfg. Co., 36 Ga. 51 (1867).   Informer has no vested right to forfeiture.    - Informer who commences a qui tam action under a penal statute does not acquire thereby a vested right to the forfeiture. Robison v. Beall, 26 Ga. 17 (1858); Hargroves v. Chambers, 30 Ga. 580 (1860).    Cited in Mack v. Westbrook, 148 Ga. 690, 98 S.E. 339 (1919); Malone v. Clark, 109 Ga. App. 134, 135 S.E.2d 517 (1964).   RESEARCH REFERENCES   C.J.S.   - 1A C.J.S., Actions, §§ 1, 74 et seq., 83. 7A C.J.S., Attorney General, § 65 et seq.
GA Code § 9-2-30 (2021)
2021 Georgia Code|Title 9 - Civil Practice|Chapter 2 - Actions Generally|Article 2 - Parties|§ 9-2-30. Substitution of Plaintiff's Spouse or Others in Action on Chose in Action Assigned as Year's Support

 When a party plaintiff dies during litigation concerning any chose in action and the chose in action is assigned to the surviving spouse, the surviving spouse and children, or the children only of the decedent as any part of a year's support, the surviving spouse personally or for the use of the surviving spouse and the children, or, in the event of children only, a next friend for the children may be made a party plaintiff upon the same terms and in the same manner that administrators are made parties plaintiff to actions in favor of their intestate, upon the submission by the person to the court of a certified copy of the assignment; and the action shall proceed in the name of the parties so made.   (Ga. L. 1878-79, p. 148, § 1; Code 1882, § 3424a; Civil Code 1895, § 5022; Civil Code 1910, § 5604; Code 1933, § 3-407.)   RESEARCH REFERENCES   C.J.S.   - 67A C.J.S., Parties, §§ 76, 77.   ALR.    - Right of next friend to compensation for services rendered to infant in the litigation, 9 A.L.R. 1537.
GA Code § 9-2-43 (2021)
2021 Georgia Code|Title 9 - Civil Practice|Chapter 2 - Actions Generally|Article 3 - Abatement|§ 9-2-43. No Abatement Where Some Defendants Not Liable

 An action against several persons shall not abate where it appears that some of the defendants are not liable but may proceed against those who are liable.   (Orig. Code 1863, § 3375; Code 1868, § 3394; Code 1873, § 3442; Code 1882, § 3442; Civil Code 1895, § 5039; Civil Code 1910, § 5621; Code 1933, § 3-504.)   RESEARCH REFERENCES   Am. Jur. 2d.   - 1 Am. Jur. 2d, Abatement, Survival, and Revival, §§ 22 et seq., 102.   C.J.S.   - 1 C.J.S., Abatement and Revival, §§ 106, 124 et seq. 27 C.J.S., Dismissal and Nonsuit, § 64 et seq.   ALR.    - Abatement by pendency of another action as affected by addition or omission of parties defendant in second suit, 44 A.L.R. 806.    Release of one of two or more persons whose independent tortious acts combine to produce an injury as releasing other or others, 134 A.L.R. 1225.    Grant of new trial, or reversal of judgment on appeal as to one joint tort-feasor, as requiring new trial or reversal as to other tort-feasor, 143 A.L.R. 7.    Reversal upon appeal by, or grant of new trial to, one coparty defendant against whom judgment was rendered, as affecting judgment in favor of other coparty defendants, 166 A.L.R. 563.
GA Code § 9-2-45 (2021)
2021 Georgia Code|Title 9 - Civil Practice|Chapter 2 - Actions Generally|Article 3 - Abatement|§ 9-2-45. No Abatement for Pendency of Action in Another State

 The pendency of a prior action in another state shall not abate an action between the same parties for the same cause in this state.   (Civil Code 1895, § 3738; Civil Code 1910, § 4332; Code 1933, § 3-602.)   RESEARCH REFERENCES   Am. Jur. 2d.   - 1 Am. Jur. 2d, Abatement, Survival, and Revival, §§ 11, 18.   C.J.S.   - 1 C.J.S., Abatement and Revival, § 70 et seq.   ALR.    - Statute requiring filing of formal notice of lis pendens in certain classes of cases as affecting common-law doctrine of lis pendens in other cases, 10 A.L.R. 306.    Action or suit as abating mandamus proceeding or vice versa, 37 A.L.R. 1432.    Abatement by pendency of another action as affected by addition or omission of parties defendant in second suit, 44 A.L.R. 806.    Res judicata as available in support of demurrer, 101 A.L.R. 1325.    Pendency of criminal prosecution as ground for continuance or postponement of civil action involving facts or transactions upon which prosecution is predicated, 123 A.L.R. 1453.
GA Code § 9-2-46 (2021)
2021 Georgia Code|Title 9 - Civil Practice|Chapter 2 - Actions Generally|Article 3 - Abatement|§ 9-2-46. Institution of Action on Same Cause in Other State; Setting Case in This State; Postponement Limited

  Whenever it is made to appear to the judge of any court that any party to a case pending in the court, after the case has been commenced, has instituted proceedings in any court of any other state involving the same controversy or cause of action, or in which the judgment which might be rendered in the other state might be pleadable in the case in this state as affecting the relief sought, it shall be the duty of the judge of the court in which the case is pending to set the case specially and ahead of all other business for trial as the first case at the next ensuing term of the court, except for other cases having precedence for the same reason.   No case so assigned for trial shall be continued or postponed for more than 30 days for any cause whatsoever at the instance of the party who has instituted the case or proceedings in the foreign state. The case may be postponed from day to day for good cause for not exceeding 30 days at the instance of such party, but after being postponed for the 30 days it shall not be further postponed at his instance. If the term of court ends within the 30 days and the case has not been continued for the term, it shall stand for trial as the first case at the next ensuing term. This Code section shall not be applied so as to set any case for trial before proper times have elapsed for notice, the filing of defensive pleadings, and discovery. Proper time limits for discovery shall be in the discretion of the judge.    (Ga. L. 1922, p. 96, §§ 1, 2; Code 1933, §§ 3-603, 3-604.)   RESEARCH REFERENCES   Am. Jur. 2d.   - 1 Am. Jur. 2d, Abatement, Survival, and Revival, § 11. 20 Am. Jur. 2d, Courts, § 82.   C.J.S.   - 1 C.J.S., Abatement and Revival, § 70 et seq. 17 C.J.S., Continuances, § 115. 21 C.J.S., Courts, §§ 170, 179.
GA Code § 9-2-47 (2021)
2021 Georgia Code|Title 9 - Civil Practice|Chapter 2 - Actions Generally|Article 3 - Abatement|§ 9-2-47. Precedence of First Filed Informer's Action; Abatement of Others

 In the case of actions by informers to recover any fine, forfeiture, or penalty, the first filed in the clerk's office shall have precedence for the same cause of action and the latter filed actions shall abate.   (Orig. Code 1863, § 2837; Code 1868, § 2845; Code 1873, § 2896; Code 1882, § 2896; Civil Code 1895, § 3740; Civil Code 1910, § 4334; Code 1933, § 3-606.)   Cross references.   - Time limitations on bringing of actions by informers to recover fine, forfeiture, or penalty, § 9-3-28.   JUDICIAL DECISIONS    Cited in Heath v. Bates, 70 Ga. 633 (1883).   RESEARCH REFERENCES   Am. Jur. 2d.   - 1 Am. Jur. 2d, Abatement, Survival, and Revival, § 12 et seq.   C.J.S.   - 1 C.J.S., Abatement and Revival, §§ 24, 44 et seq.   ALR.    - Statute requiring filing of formal notice of lis pendens in certain classes of cases as affecting common-law doctrine of lis pendens in other cases, 10 A.L.R. 306.    Action or suit as abating mandamus proceeding or vice versa, 37 A.L.R. 1432.    Abatement by pendency of another action as affected by addition or omission of parties defendant in second suit, 44 A.L.R. 806.
GA Code § 9-2-62 (2021)
2021 Georgia Code|Title 9 - Civil Practice|Chapter 2 - Actions Generally|Article 4 - Dismissal and Renewal|§ 9-2-62. Retraxit and Dismissal or Discontinuance Distinguished

 A retraxit differs from a dismissal or discontinuance in that a retraxit is the open, public, and voluntary renunciation by the plaintiff in open court of his action or cause of action. It is positive and conclusive of the plaintiff's right of action. Where a retraxit is entered by the plaintiff and a judgment is entered thereon by the defendant, the plaintiff's right of action shall be forever gone. A dismissal or discontinuance is negative, and the plaintiff may recommence his action on the payment of costs.   (Orig. Code 1863, §§ 3378, 3379; Code 1868, §§ 3397, 3398; Code 1873, §§ 3445, 3446; Code 1882, §§ 3445, 3446; Civil Code 1895, §§ 5042, 5043; Civil Code 1910, §§ 5624, 5625; Code 1933, §§ 3-507, 3-508; Ga. L. 1967, p. 226, § 38.)   Law reviews.   - For article, "The 1967 Amendments to the Georgia Civil Practice Act and the Appellate Procedure Act," see 3 Ga. St. B.J. 383 (1967).   JUDICIAL DECISIONS   ANALYSIS    General Consideration   Retraxit   Dismissal or Discontinuance    RESEARCH REFERENCES   Am. Jur. 2d.   - 24 Am. Jur. 2d, Dismissal, Discontinuance, and Nonsuit, §§ 4, 58, 90.   C.J.S.   - 27 C.J.S., Dismissal and Nonsuit, §§ 2, 3, 6.   ALR.    - Reinstatement, after expiration of term, of case which has been voluntarily withdrawn, dismissed, or nonsuited, 111 A.L.R. 767.   Statute permitting new action after failure of original action commenced within period of limitation, as applicable in cases where original action failed for lack of jurisdiction, 6 A.L.R.3d 1043.
GA Code § 9-3-2 (2021)
2021 Georgia Code|Title 9 - Civil Practice|Chapter 3 - Limitations of Actions|Article 1 - General Provisions|§ 9-3-2. Limitations Against Municipalities

 Any claim or demand held by any municipality not in the nature of a special contract or not reduced to execution shall be barred by the general statutes of limitation of force, and all executions issued by any municipality shall be subject to the same laws relating to the statutes of limitation governing other executions.   (Ga. L. 1899, p. 60, § 1; Civil Code 1910, § 4372; Code 1933, § 3-716.)   RESEARCH REFERENCES   Am. Jur. 2d.   - 30 Am. Jur. 2d, Executions and Enforcement of Judgments, §§ 73, 74, 171, 414, 589. 51 Am. Jur. 2d, Limitation of Actions, § 86.   C.J.S.   - 54 C.J.S., Limitations of Actions, § 30 et seq.   ALR.    - Validity of contract exempting municipality from liability for negligence, 41 A.L.R. 1358.    Liability of municipality for injury to lateral support in grading street, 44 A.L.R. 1494.    When statute of limitations begins to run against warrant of municipal or quasi municipal corporation, 56 A.L.R. 830.    Action by municipality to enforce lien for special assessment as within statute of limitations not specifically covering it, 103 A.L.R. 885.    Statute of limitations as applicable to action by municipality or other political subdivision in absence of specific provision in that regard, 113 A.L.R. 376.    Liquidation or other proceeding by government against bank or other corporation, as suspending statute of limitations as regards choses in action belonging to corporation, or stockholder's superadded liability, 122 A.L.R. 945.    When statute of limitations commences to run as to action against municipality for damages to riparian premises by pollution of stream by discharge of sewage, 122 A.L.R. 1509.    Applicability of statute of limitations to action to enforce special assessments as affected by question whether imposition or enforcement of the assessment is an exercise of a governmental function, 136 A.L.R. 572.    Limitation applicable to action for consequential damage as result of taking or damaging of property for public use, 139 A.L.R. 1288.    Statutory provision that statute of limitation shall not apply to action in name of municipality or other public corporation, as applicable to actions involving proprietary as distinguished from governmental functions, 162 A.L.R. 261.   Waiver of, or estoppel to rely upon, contractual limitation of time for bringing action against municipality or other political subdivision, 81 A.L.R.2d 1039.