reglab/housing_qa huggingface dataset:
SD Codified L § 23A-35A-2 (2021)
2021 South Dakota Codified Laws|Title 23A - Criminal Procedure|Chapter 35A - Interception Of Wire, Electronic, Or Oral Communications|Section 23A-35A-2 - Authorization or approval for interception of communications.

23A-35A-2. Authorization or approval for interception of communications.Any order authorizing or approving the interception of wire, electronic, or oral communications may be granted, subject to the provisions of this chapter, if the interception may provide or has provided evidence of the commission of, or of any conspiracy to commit, the following offenses as otherwise defined by the laws of this state: crimes of violence listed in subdivision 22-1-2(9); sex crimes listed in §22-24B-1; escape as defined in chapter 22-11A; fugitives from justice with an active felony warrant; gambling; bribery; theft; unlawful use of a computer; and unauthorized manufacturing, distribution or counterfeiting of controlled substances or marijuana. Source: SL 1969, ch 158, § 6; SDCL Supp, § 23-13A-3; SL 1980, ch 181, § 2; SL 1981, ch 177, § 3; SL 1984, ch 183; SL 2017, ch 108, § 2; SL 2020, ch 101, § 1.
SD Codified L § 23A-35A-3 (2021)
2021 South Dakota Codified Laws|Title 23A - Criminal Procedure|Chapter 35A - Interception Of Wire, Electronic, Or Oral Communications|Section 23A-35A-3 - Authority of attorney general or state's attorney to apply for order for interception of communications.

23A-35A-3. Authority of attorney general or state's attorney to apply for order for interception of communications.The attorney general or any state's attorney may apply to any circuit judge for an order to authorize or approve the interception of wire, electronic, or oral communications by an investigative or law enforcement officer having the responsibility of investigating the offense for which the application is made and any offense pursuant to §23A-35A-2. The attorney general or the state's attorney applying may designate a deputy or assistant to make any subsequent applications or presentations necessary to implement the order or comply with any of the provisions of this chapter. Source: SL 1969, ch 158, §4; SDCL Supp, §23-13A-4; SL 1980, ch 181, §3; SL 1983, ch 187, §2; SL 2017, ch 108, §3.
SD Codified L § 23A-35A-4 (2021)
2021 South Dakota Codified Laws|Title 23A - Criminal Procedure|Chapter 35A - Interception Of Wire, Electronic, Or Oral Communications|Section 23A-35A-4 - Application to intercept communications--Form and contents.

23A-35A-4. Application to intercept communications--Form and contents.The attorney general or state's attorney shall make an application pursuant to §23A-35A-3 in writing and upon the oath or affirmation of the applicant. The application shall include:(1)The name and title of the applicant;(2)A full and complete statement of the facts and circumstances relied upon by the applicant, including the supporting oath or affirmation of the investigating officer of any police department of the state or any political subdivision thereof, or the investigating sheriff or deputy of any county, to justify the belief that an order should be issued, including:(a)Details as to the particular crime that has been, is being, or is about to be committed;(b)The identity of the person, if known, believed to be committing the offense and whose communications are to be intercepted;(c)A particular description of the type of communications sought to be intercepted;(d)A particular description of the nature and location of the facilities from which or the place where the communication is to be intercepted; and(e)In the case of a telegraphic, electronic, or telephonic communication, identifying the particular telephone number or telegraph line involved;(3)A full and complete statement as to if other investigative procedures have been tried and failed, why other investigative procedures reasonably appear to be unlikely to succeed if tried, or to be too dangerous;(4)A statement of the period of time the interception is required to be maintained. If the nature of the investigation is such that authorization to intercept should not automatically terminate when the described type of communication has been first obtained, a particular description of facts establishing probable cause to believe that additional communications of the same type will occur after the first communication obtained;(5)A full and complete statement of the facts concerning all previous applications known to the person authorizing and making the application, made to any judge for authorization to intercept, or for approval of interceptions of, wire, electronic, or oral communications involving any of the same persons, facilities, or places specified in the application, and the action taken by the judge on each such application; and(6)If the application is for the extension of an order, a statement setting forth the results thus far obtained from the interception, or a reasonable explanation of the failure to obtain such results. Source: SL 1980, ch 181, §10; SL 2017, ch 108, §4.
SD Codified L § 23A-35A-5 (2021)
2021 South Dakota Codified Laws|Title 23A - Criminal Procedure|Chapter 35A - Interception Of Wire, Electronic, Or Oral Communications|Section 23A-35A-5 - Circuit judge to authorize interception.

23A-35A-5. Circuit judge to authorize interception.Only a judge of a circuit court of the State of South Dakota may grant orders authorizing the interception of wire, electronic, or oral communications. Source: SL 1969, ch 158, §3; SDCL Supp, §23-13A-5; SL 1980, ch 181, §4; SL 2017, ch 108, §5.
SD Codified L § 23A-35A-6 (2021)
2021 South Dakota Codified Laws|Title 23A - Criminal Procedure|Chapter 35A - Interception Of Wire, Electronic, Or Oral Communications|Section 23A-35A-6 - Ex parte order authorizing wiretapping or eavesdropping--Probable cause required for entry.

23A-35A-6. Ex parte order authorizing wiretapping or eavesdropping--Probable cause required for entry.Upon proper application, a judge may enter an ex parte order, as requested or with any appropriate modifications, authorizing wiretapping or eavesdropping if the judge determines based on the facts submitted by the applicant that:(1)There is probable cause to believe that a person is committing, has committed, or is about to commit a particular crime pursuant to §23A-35A-2;(2)There is probable cause to believe that particular communications concerning that offense will be obtained through the interception;(3)Normal investigative procedures have been tried and have failed, reasonably appear to be unlikely to succeed if tried, or to be too dangerous; and(4)There is probable cause to believe that the facilities from which or the place where the wire, electronic, or oral communications are to be used, in connection with the commission of the offense, or are leased to, listed in the name of or commonly used by the person. Source: SL 1980, ch 181, §11; SL 2017, ch 108, §6.
SD Codified L § 23A-35A-7 (2021)
2021 South Dakota Codified Laws|Title 23A - Criminal Procedure|Chapter 35A - Interception Of Wire, Electronic, Or Oral Communications|Section 23A-35A-7 - Contents of order.

23A-35A-7. Contents of order.Each order authorizing the interception of any wire, electronic, or oral communication shall specify:(1)The identity of the person, if known, whose communications are to be intercepted;(2)The nature and location of the communications facilities as to which, or the place where authority to intercept is granted;(3)A particular description of the type of communication sought to be intercepted, and a statement of the particular offense to which it relates;(4)The identity of the agency authorized to intercept the communications, and of the person authorizing the application;(5)The period of time the interception is authorized, including a statement as to whether or not the interception shall automatically terminate when the described communication has been first obtained; and(6)That the authorization for wiretapping or eavesdropping be executed as soon as practicable; that the wiretapping or eavesdropping be conducted in such a way as to minimize interception of communications not otherwise subject to interception under this section; and that the wiretapping or eavesdropping shall terminate upon attainment of the authorized objective, or on the date specified, whichever comes first. Source: SL 1980, ch 181, §12; SL 2017, ch 108, §7.
SD Codified L § 23A-35A-8 (2021)
2021 South Dakota Codified Laws|Title 23A - Criminal Procedure|Chapter 35A - Interception Of Wire, Electronic, Or Oral Communications|Section 23A-35A-8 - Cooperation and technical assistance required of carriers, landlords, and others--Compensation.

23A-35A-8. Cooperation and technical assistance required of carriers, landlords, and others--Compensation.Any order authorizing wiretapping or eavesdropping shall, upon the request of the applicant, direct that the common carrier, landlords, custodians, or other persons furnish the applicant forthwith all information, facilities, and technical assistance necessary to accomplish the interception unobtrusively and with a minimum of interference with the services that such carrier is according the person whose communications are to be intercepted.Any common carrier, or other person furnishing such facilities or technical assistance shall be compensated therefor by the applicant at the prevailing rates. Source: SL 1980, ch 181, §18.
SD Codified L § 23A-35A-9 (2021)
2021 South Dakota Codified Laws|Title 23A - Criminal Procedure|Chapter 35A - Interception Of Wire, Electronic, Or Oral Communications|Section 23A-35A-9 - Progress reports to issuing judge.

23A-35A-9. Progress reports to issuing judge.The order may require written reports to be made to the issuing judge at specified intervals showing the progress made toward achieving the authorized objective and the need for continued interception. Source: SL 1980, ch 181, §19.
SD Codified L § 23A-35A-10 (2021)
2021 South Dakota Codified Laws|Title 23A - Criminal Procedure|Chapter 35A - Interception Of Wire, Electronic, Or Oral Communications|Section 23A-35A-10 - Duration of order--Extensions.

23A-35A-10. Duration of order--Extensions.No order entered under this section may authorize the interception of any wire, electronic, or oral communication for any period longer than is necessary to achieve the objective of the authorization, in any event no longer than thirty days. Any extension of any order may be granted, but only upon application for an extension made in accordance with §23A-35A-4 and the judge makes the required findings pursuant to §23A-35A-6. The period of extension may not be longer than the authorizing judge deems necessary to achieve the purposes for which the extension was granted and in no event for longer than thirty days. Source: SL 1980, ch 181, §13; SL 2017, ch 108, §8.
SD Codified L § 23A-35A-11 (2021)
2021 South Dakota Codified Laws|Title 23A - Criminal Procedure|Chapter 35A - Interception Of Wire, Electronic, Or Oral Communications|Section 23A-35A-11 - Authority for eavesdropping--Retention of orders and papers by applicant--Copy of order retained by judge.

23A-35A-11. Authority for eavesdropping--Retention of orders and papers by applicant--Copy of order retained by judge.Any ex parte order for wiretapping and eavesdropping, together with the papers upon which the application was based, shall be delivered to and retained by the applicant during the duration of the wiretap as authority for the eavesdropping authorized therein. A true copy of such order shall at all times be retained by the judge or justice issuing the same. Source: SL 1980, ch 181, §14.
SD Codified L § 23A-35A-12 (2021)
2021 South Dakota Codified Laws|Title 23A - Criminal Procedure|Chapter 35A - Interception Of Wire, Electronic, Or Oral Communications|Section 23A-35A-12 - Sealing of applications and orders--Custody--Disclosure for good cause.

23A-35A-12. Sealing of applications and orders--Custody--Disclosure for good cause.After the termination of the authorized eavesdropping, applications made and orders granted under this statute shall within ten days be returned to and sealed by the judge. Custody of the applications and orders shall be wherever the judge directs. Such applications and orders shall be disclosed only upon a showing of good cause before a judge of competent jurisdiction or as otherwise provided. Source: SL 1980, ch 181, §15.
SD Codified L § 23A-35A-13 (2021)
2021 South Dakota Codified Laws|Title 23A - Criminal Procedure|Chapter 35A - Interception Of Wire, Electronic, Or Oral Communications|Section 23A-35A-13 - Recording of intercepted communications if possible--Sealing of recordings.

23A-35A-13. Recording of intercepted communications if possible--Sealing of recordings.The contents of any wire, electronic, or oral communication intercepted by any means authorized by this statute shall, if possible, be recorded. The recording of the contents of any wire, electronic, or oral communication under this section shall be done in a way to protect the recording from editing or alteration. Immediately upon the expiration of the period of the order or extension, the recordings shall be made available to the judge issuing the order or extension and sealed under the judge's direction. Source: SL 1980, ch 181, §16; SL 2017, ch 108, §9.
SD Codified L § 23A-35A-14 (2021)
2021 South Dakota Codified Laws|Title 23A - Criminal Procedure|Chapter 35A - Interception Of Wire, Electronic, Or Oral Communications|Section 23A-35A-14 - Disclosures to interested parties--Inspection of intercepted communications, application, or order--Postponement of notice.

23A-35A-14. Disclosures to interested parties--Inspection of intercepted communications, application, or order--Postponement of notice.Within ninety days after an application under §23A-35A-3 is denied, or the period of an order or extension expires, the issuing or denying judge shall cause the persons named in the order or application and any other parties to intercepted communications as the judge may determine the interests of justice require, to be served with an inventory including notice of:(1)The fact of the entry of the order or the application;(2)The date of the entry and the period of authorized interception, or the denial of the application; and(3)The fact that during the period wire, electronic, or oral communications were or were not intercepted.On motion, the judge may make available to the person or the person's counsel for inspection the portions of the intercepted communications, applications, and order as the judge determines to be in the interest of justice. On an ex parte showing of good cause to the judge, the serving of the notice required by this section may be postponed. Source: SL 1980, ch 181, §17; SL 2017, ch 108, §10.
SD Codified L § 23A-35A-15 (2021)
2021 South Dakota Codified Laws|Title 23A - Criminal Procedure|Chapter 35A - Interception Of Wire, Electronic, Or Oral Communications|Section 23A-35A-15 - Disclosure of contents of intercepted communications among investigative or law enforcement officers.

23A-35A-15. Disclosure of contents of intercepted communications among investigative or law enforcement officers.Any investigative or law enforcement officer who, by any means authorized by this chapter, has obtained knowledge of the contents of any wire, electronic, or oral communication, or evidence derived from the contents, may disclose the contents to another investigative or law enforcement officer to the extent that a disclosure is appropriate to the proper performance of the official duties of the officer making or receiving the disclosure. Source: SL 1969, ch 158, §5 (1); SDCL Supp, §23-13A-6; SL 1980, ch 181, §5; SL 2017, ch 108, §11.
SD Codified L § 23A-35A-16 (2021)
2021 South Dakota Codified Laws|Title 23A - Criminal Procedure|Chapter 35A - Interception Of Wire, Electronic, Or Oral Communications|Section 23A-35A-16 - Appropriate use of contents of intercepted communication by investigative or law enforcement officer.

23A-35A-16. Appropriate use of contents of intercepted communication by investigative or law enforcement officer.Any investigative or law enforcement officer who, by any means authorized by this chapter, has obtained knowledge of the contents of any wire, electronic, or oral communication or evidence derived from the contents may use the contents to the extent appropriate to the proper performance of the officer's official duties. Source: SL 1969, ch 158, §5 (2); SDCL Supp, §23-13A-7; SL 1980, ch 181, §6; SL 2017, ch 108, §12.
SD Codified L § 23A-35A-17 (2021)
2021 South Dakota Codified Laws|Title 23A - Criminal Procedure|Chapter 35A - Interception Of Wire, Electronic, Or Oral Communications|Section 23A-35A-17 - Disclosure of contents of intercepted communication in court or grand jury proceeding.

23A-35A-17. Disclosure of contents of intercepted communication in court or grand jury proceeding.Any person, who has received, by any means authorized by this chapter or chapter 119 of the United States Code, or a like statute of another state, any information concerning the contents of a wire, electronic, or oral communication, or evidence derived from the contents, intercepted in accordance with the provisions of this chapter may disclose the contents of that communication or any derivative evidence while giving testimony under oath or affirmation in any proceeding in any court in this state, before any grand jury in this state, in any court of the United States or of any other state, or in any federal or state grand jury proceeding. Source: SL 1969, ch 158, §5 (3); SDCL Supp, §23-13A-8; SL 2017, ch 108, §13.
SD Codified L § 23A-35A-18 (2021)
2021 South Dakota Codified Laws|Title 23A - Criminal Procedure|Chapter 35A - Interception Of Wire, Electronic, Or Oral Communications|Section 23A-35A-18 - Interception of communications relating to offenses other than specified in order--Use of contents.

23A-35A-18. Interception of communications relating to offenses other than specified in order--Use of contents.If an investigative or law enforcement officer, while engaged in intercepting wire, electronic, or oral communications in the manner authorized by this chapter, intercepts wire, electronic, or oral communications relating to offenses not specified in the order of authorization or approval, the contents of the communication, and evidence derived from the communication, may be disclosed or used as provided in §§23A-35A-15 and 23A-35A-16. The contents and any evidence derived from the contents may be used under §23A-35A-17 if authorized or approved by a circuit court judge where the judge finds on subsequent application, made as soon as practicable, that the contents were otherwise intercepted in accordance with the provisions of this chapter. Source: SL 1969, ch 158, §5 (5); SDCL Supp, §23-13A-9; SL 1980, ch 181, §7; SL 2017, ch 108, §14.
SD Codified L § 23A-35A-19 (2021)
2021 South Dakota Codified Laws|Title 23A - Criminal Procedure|Chapter 35A - Interception Of Wire, Electronic, Or Oral Communications|Section 23A-35A-19 - Privileged communications.

23A-35A-19. Privileged communications.No otherwise privileged wire, electronic, or oral communication intercepted in accordance with, or in violation of, the provisions of this chapter may lose its privileged character. Source: SL 1969, ch 158, §5 (4); SDCL Supp, §23-13A-10; SL 1980, ch 181, §8; SL 2017, ch 108, §15.
SD Codified L § 23A-35A-20 (2021)
2021 South Dakota Codified Laws|Title 23A - Criminal Procedure|Chapter 35A - Interception Of Wire, Electronic, Or Oral Communications|Section 23A-35A-20 - Overhearing or recording communications, conversations, or jury deliberations by means of eavesdropping device as felony.

23A-35A-20. Overhearing or recording communications, conversations, or jury deliberations by means of eavesdropping device as felony.Except as provided in §23A-35A-21, a person is guilty of a Class 5 felony who is not:(1)A sender or receiver of a communication who intentionally and by means of an eavesdropping device overhears or records a communication, or aids, authorizes, employs, procures, or permits another to overhear or record, without the consent of either a sender or receiver of the communication;(2)A person present during a conversation or discussion who intentionally and by means of an eavesdropping device overhears or records the conversation or discussion, or aids, authorizes, employs, procures, or permits another to overhear or record, without the consent of a party to the conversation or discussion; or(3)A member of a jury who intentionally records or listens to by means of an eavesdropping device the deliberations of the jury or aids, authorizes, employs, procures, or permits another to record or listen. Source: SL 1980, ch 181, §20; SL 2006, ch 136, §1; SL 2017, ch 108, §16.
SD Codified L § 23A-35A-21 (2021)
2021 South Dakota Codified Laws|Title 23A - Criminal Procedure|Chapter 35A - Interception Of Wire, Electronic, Or Oral Communications|Section 23A-35A-21 - Exemptions from chapter.

23A-35A-21. Exemptions from chapter.The following is exempt from the provisions of this chapter:(1)Wiretapping and eavesdropping pursuant to an ex parte order granted pursuant to §23A-35A-6;(2)The normal use of services, equipment, and facilities provided by a common carrier pursuant to tariffs on file with the Public Utilities Commission of the State of South Dakota or the federal communications commission;(3)The normal functions of any operator of a switchboard;(4)Any officer, agent, or employee of a communications common carrier engaged in the business of providing service, equipment, and facilities for communication who performs acts otherwise prohibited by this chapter in providing such communication services, equipment, and facilities or in constructing, maintaining, repairing, operating, or using same, including the obtaining of billing and accounting information, the protecting of the communication services, equipment, and facilities from illegal use in violation of tariffs on file with the corporation commission of this state or the federal communications commission and the protecting of the common carrier from the commission of fraud against it;(5)The providing of requested information or other response to a subpoena or other order issued by a court of competent jurisdiction or on demand of other lawful authority; and(6)Any officer, agent, or employee of a communications common carrier, or any common carrier, who provides information, facilities, or technical assistance to an investigative or law enforcement officer authorized to intercept or eavesdrop pursuant to an ex parte order granted pursuant to §23A-35A-6. Source: SL 1980, ch 181, §21; SL 1984, ch 12, §18; SL 2017, ch 108, §17.
SD Codified L § 23A-35A-22 (2021)
2021 South Dakota Codified Laws|Title 23A - Criminal Procedure|Chapter 35A - Interception Of Wire, Electronic, Or Oral Communications|Section 23A-35A-22 - Use of pen register or trap and trace device without court order prohibited--Violation as misdemeanor.

23A-35A-22. Use of pen register or trap and trace device without court order prohibited--Violation as misdemeanor.Except as provided in §23A-35A-1 or 23A-35A-22 to 23A-35A-34, inclusive, no person may install or use a pen register or a trap or trace device without first obtaining a court order under §23A-35A-27. A violation of this section is a Class 1 misdemeanor. Source: SL 1988, ch 194, §2.