NY Crim Pro L § 700.65 (2021)
2021 New York Laws CPL - Criminal Procedure Part 3 - Special Proceedings and Miscellaneous Procedures Title T - Procedures for Securing Evidence by Means of Court Order and for Suppressing Evidence Unlawfully or Improperly Obtained Article 700 - Eavesdropping and Video Surveillance Warrants 700.65 - Eavesdropping and Video Surveillance Warrants; Disclosure and Use of Information; Order of Amendment.

§ 700.65 Eavesdropping  and  video surveillance warrants; disclosure anduse of information; order of amendment.1.  Any law enforcement officer who, by any means authorized  by  this   article,  has  obtained  knowledge  of  the  contents of any intercepted   communication or video surveillance, or evidence derived therefrom,  may   disclose  such contents to another law enforcement officer to the extent   that such disclosure is appropriate to the  proper  performance  of  the   official duties of the officer making or receiving the disclosure.2.    Any law enforcement officer who, by any means authorized by this   article, has obtained knowledge  of  the  contents  of  any  intercepted   communication  or video surveillance, or evidence derived therefrom, may   use such contents to the extent such use is appropriate  to  the  proper   performance of his official duties.3.    Any  person  who  has  received, by any means authorized by this   article,  any  information   concerning   a   communication   or   video   surveillance, or evidence derived therefrom, intercepted or conducted in   accordance  with  the  provisions  of  this  article,  may  disclose the   contents of that communication or video surveillance, or such derivative   evidence, while giving testimony under oath in any  criminal  proceeding   in  any  court,  in any grand jury proceeding or in any action commenced   pursuant to article thirteen-A or thirteen-B of the civil  practice  law   and rules; provided, however, that the presence of the seal provided for   by  subdivision  two of section 700.50, or a satisfactory explanation of   the absence thereof, shall be a prerequisite for the use  or  disclosure   of  the contents of any communication or video surveillance, or evidence   derived therefrom; and provided further, however, that where a  criminal   court  of competent jurisdiction has ordered exclusion or suppression of   the contents of an intercepted communication or video  surveillance,  or   evidence  derived  therefrom,  such determination shall be binding in an   action commenced pursuant to article thirteen-A  or  thirteen-B  of  the   civil practice law and rules.4.  When  a  law  enforcement  officer,  while engaged in intercepting   communications or conducting video surveillance in the manner authorized   by this article, intercepts a  communication  or  makes  an  observation   which  was  not  otherwise  sought and which constitutes evidence of any   crime that has been, is being or is about to be committed, the  contents   of  such  communications or observation, and evidence derived therefrom,   may be disclosed or used as provided in subdivisions one and two.   Such   contents   and   any  evidence  derived  therefrom  may  be  used  under   subdivision three when a  justice  amends  the  eavesdropping  or  video   surveillance  warrant to include such contents. The application for such   amendment must be made by the applicant as soon as practicable by giving   notice to the court of the interception  of  the  communication  or  the   making  of  the  observation and of the contents of such interception or   observation; provided that during the period in which the  eavesdropping   or  video  surveillance  is continuing, such notice must be given within   ten days after probable cause exists to believe that a crime  not  named   in  the  warrant  has been, is being, or is about to be committed, or at   the time an application for an order of extension is  made  pursuant  to   section  700.40  of  this  article,  if such probable cause then exists,   whichever is earlier.   If the justice finds  that  such  contents  were   otherwise intercepted in accordance with the provisions of this article,   he may grant the application.