reglab/housing_qa huggingface dataset:
OR Rev Stat § 131.015 (2021)
2021 Oregon Revised Statutes|Volume : 04 - Criminal Procedure, Crimes|Chapter 131 - Preliminary Provisions; Limitations; Jurisdiction; Venue; Criminal Forfeiture; Crime Prevention|Section 131.015 - Application to prior and subsequent actions.

 (1) The provisions of chapter 836, Oregon Laws 1973, apply to: (a) All criminal actions and proceedings commenced upon or after January 1, 1974, and all appeals and other post-judgment proceedings relating or attaching thereto; and (b) All matters of criminal procedure prescribed in chapter 836, Oregon Laws 1973, which do not constitute a part of any particular action or case, occurring upon or after January 1, 1974. (2) The provisions of chapter 836, Oregon Laws 1973, do not impair or render ineffectual any proceedings or procedural matters which occurred before January 1, 1974. [1973 c.836 §2] Note: See note under 131.005.
OR Rev Stat § 131.025 (2021)
2021 Oregon Revised Statutes|Volume : 04 - Criminal Procedure, Crimes|Chapter 131 - Preliminary Provisions; Limitations; Jurisdiction; Venue; Criminal Forfeiture; Crime Prevention|Section 131.025 - Parties in criminal action.

Except for offenses based on municipal or county ordinances, in a criminal action the State of Oregon is the plaintiff and the person prosecuted is the defendant. [1973 c.836 §3]
OR Rev Stat § 131.035 (2021)
2021 Oregon Revised Statutes|Volume : 04 - Criminal Procedure, Crimes|Chapter 131 - Preliminary Provisions; Limitations; Jurisdiction; Venue; Criminal Forfeiture; Crime Prevention|Section 131.035 - When departures, errors or mistakes in pleadings or proceedings are material.

No departure from the form or mode prescribed by law, error or mistake in any criminal pleading, action or proceeding renders it invalid, unless it has prejudiced the defendant in respect to a substantial right. [1973 c.836 §4]
OR Rev Stat § 131.040 (2021)
2021 Oregon Revised Statutes|Volume : 04 - Criminal Procedure, Crimes|Chapter 131 - Preliminary Provisions; Limitations; Jurisdiction; Venue; Criminal Forfeiture; Crime Prevention|Section 131.040 - When law enforcement officer may communicate with person represented by counsel.

A law enforcement officer may communicate with a person who is represented by counsel without obtaining the prior consent of counsel, and an attorney who prosecutes violations of the criminal laws of this state or the United States is not required to forbid or otherwise prevent the communication, if: (1) The communication is related to a criminal investigation; (2) No accusatory instrument has been filed charging the person with the commission of an offense that is the subject of the investigation or communication, and no juvenile petition has been filed alleging acts that would constitute the commission of an offense that is the subject of the investigation or communication; and (3) The communication is not in violation of the Constitution of the United States or of the State of Oregon. [1995 c.657 §19]
OR Rev Stat § 131.045 (2021)
2021 Oregon Revised Statutes|Volume : 04 - Criminal Procedure, Crimes|Chapter 131 - Preliminary Provisions; Limitations; Jurisdiction; Venue; Criminal Forfeiture; Crime Prevention|Section 131.045 - Appearances by simultaneous electronic transmission.

(1) As used in this section: (a) "Criminal proceeding" has the meaning given that term in ORS 131.005. (b) "Parties" means the State of Oregon and the person being prosecuted. (c) "Simultaneous electronic transmission" means television, telephone or any other form of electronic communication transmission if the form of transmission allows: (A) The court and the person making the appearance to communicate with each other during the proceeding; (B) A defendant who is represented by counsel to consult privately with defense counsel during the proceeding; (C) The victim to participate in the proceeding to the same extent that the victim is entitled to participate when the person making the appearance is physically present in the court; and (D) The public to hear and, if the transmission includes a visual image, to see the appearance if the public has a right to hear and see the appearance when the person making the appearance is physically present in the court. (2) When a statute authorizes or requires a person to make a personal appearance before a court in a criminal proceeding, the person may appear by being physically present in the court or by simultaneous electronic transmission if: (a) Simultaneous electronic transmission is authorized by court rule under subsection (3) of this section; (b) Except as otherwise provided by law, the parties in the proceeding and the court agree to appearance by simultaneous electronic transmission; and (c) Appearance by simultaneous electronic transmission is not specifically prohibited by statute. (3) In order for a person to appear by simultaneous electronic transmission as provided in this section, court rules must provide for the use of the specific type of simultaneous electronic transmission at the court location and for the type of proceeding in which the person is appearing. Court rules allowing the use of simultaneous electronic transmission may establish requirements for its use. (4) Notwithstanding subsection (2)(b) of this section, a witness in a criminal proceeding may not appear before a jury by simultaneous electronic transmission without the written consent of the parties and the agreement of the court. (5) This section does not apply to a hearing under ORS 138.510 to 138.680. [2005 c.566 §4; 2009 c.219 §2]
OR Rev Stat § 131.105 (2021)
2021 Oregon Revised Statutes|Volume : 04 - Criminal Procedure, Crimes|Chapter 131 - Preliminary Provisions; Limitations; Jurisdiction; Venue; Criminal Forfeiture; Crime Prevention|Section 131.105 - Timeliness of criminal actions.

A criminal action must be commenced within the period of limitation prescribed in ORS 131.125 to 131.155. [1973 c.836 §5]
OR Rev Stat § 131.135 (2021)
2021 Oregon Revised Statutes|Volume : 04 - Criminal Procedure, Crimes|Chapter 131 - Preliminary Provisions; Limitations; Jurisdiction; Venue; Criminal Forfeiture; Crime Prevention|Section 131.135 - When prosecution commenced.

A prosecution is commenced when a warrant or other process is issued, provided that the warrant or other process is executed without unreasonable delay. [1973 c.836 §7]
OR Rev Stat § 131.145 (2021)
2021 Oregon Revised Statutes|Volume : 04 - Criminal Procedure, Crimes|Chapter 131 - Preliminary Provisions; Limitations; Jurisdiction; Venue; Criminal Forfeiture; Crime Prevention|Section 131.145 - When time starts to run; tolling of statute.

(1) For the purposes of ORS 131.125, time starts to run on the day after the offense is committed. (2) Except as provided in ORS 131.155, the period of limitation does not run during: (a) Any time when the accused is not an inhabitant of or usually resident within this state; or (b) Any time when the accused hides within the state so as to prevent process being served upon the accused. (3) If, when the offense is committed, the accused is out of the state, the action may be commenced within the time provided in ORS 131.125 after the coming of the accused into the state. [1973 c.836 §8; 1987 c.158 §19]
OR Rev Stat § 131.155 (2021)
2021 Oregon Revised Statutes|Volume : 04 - Criminal Procedure, Crimes|Chapter 131 - Preliminary Provisions; Limitations; Jurisdiction; Venue; Criminal Forfeiture; Crime Prevention|Section 131.155 - Tolling of statute; three-year maximum.

Notwithstanding ORS 131.145, in no case shall the period of limitation otherwise applicable be extended by more than three years. [1973 c.836 §9]
OR Rev Stat § 131.205 (2021)
2021 Oregon Revised Statutes|Volume : 04 - Criminal Procedure, Crimes|Chapter 131 - Preliminary Provisions; Limitations; Jurisdiction; Venue; Criminal Forfeiture; Crime Prevention|Section 131.205 - Definition for ORS 131.205 to 131.235.

As used in ORS 131.205 to 131.235, "this state" means the land and water and the airspace above the land and water with respect to which the State of Oregon has legislative jurisdiction. [1973 c.836 §13]
OR Rev Stat § 131.215 (2021)
2021 Oregon Revised Statutes|Volume : 04 - Criminal Procedure, Crimes|Chapter 131 - Preliminary Provisions; Limitations; Jurisdiction; Venue; Criminal Forfeiture; Crime Prevention|Section 131.215 - Jurisdiction.

Except as otherwise provided in ORS 131.205 to 131.235, a person is subject to prosecution under the laws of this state for an offense that the person commits by the conduct of the person or the conduct of another for which the person is criminally liable if: (1) Either the conduct that is an element of the offense or the result that is an element occurs within this state; or (2) Conduct occurring outside this state is sufficient under the law of this state to constitute an attempt to commit an offense within this state; or (3) Conduct occurring outside this state is sufficient under the law of this state to constitute a conspiracy to commit an offense within this state and an overt act in furtherance of the conspiracy occurs within this state; or (4) Conduct occurring within this state establishes complicity in the commission of, or an attempt, solicitation or conspiracy to commit an offense in another jurisdiction which also is an offense under the law of this state; or (5) The offense consists of the omission to perform a legal duty imposed by the law of this state with respect to domicile, residence or a relationship to a person, thing or transaction in this state; or (6) The offense violates a statute of this state that expressly prohibits conduct outside this state affecting a legislatively protected interest of or within this state and the actor has reason to know that the conduct of the actor is likely to affect that interest. [1973 c.836 §10]
OR Rev Stat § 131.225 (2021)
2021 Oregon Revised Statutes|Volume : 04 - Criminal Procedure, Crimes|Chapter 131 - Preliminary Provisions; Limitations; Jurisdiction; Venue; Criminal Forfeiture; Crime Prevention|Section 131.225 - Exceptions.

(1) Unless in the statute defining the offense a legislative intent clearly appears to declare the conduct criminal, regardless of the place of the result, ORS 131.215 (1) does not apply if: (a) Either causing a specified result or an intent to cause or danger of causing that result is an element of an offense; and (b) The result occurs or is designed or likely to occur only in another jurisdiction where the conduct charged would not constitute an offense. (2) ORS 131.215 (1) does not apply if causing a particular result is an element of an offense and the result is caused by conduct occurring outside this state that would not constitute an offense if the result had occurred there, unless the actor intentionally or knowingly caused the result within this state. [1973 c.836 §11]
OR Rev Stat § 131.235 (2021)
2021 Oregon Revised Statutes|Volume : 04 - Criminal Procedure, Crimes|Chapter 131 - Preliminary Provisions; Limitations; Jurisdiction; Venue; Criminal Forfeiture; Crime Prevention|Section 131.235 - Criminal homicide.

(1) If the offense committed is criminal homicide, either the death of the victim or the conduct causing death constitutes a "result" within the meaning of ORS 131.215 (1). (2) If the body, or a part thereof, of a criminal homicide victim is found within this state, it shall be prima facie evidence that the result occurred within this state. [1973 c.836 §12]
OR Rev Stat § 131.305 (2021)
2021 Oregon Revised Statutes|Volume : 04 - Criminal Procedure, Crimes|Chapter 131 - Preliminary Provisions; Limitations; Jurisdiction; Venue; Criminal Forfeiture; Crime Prevention|Section 131.305 - Place of trial.

(1) Except as otherwise provided in ORS 131.305 to 131.415, criminal actions shall be commenced and tried in the county in which the conduct that constitutes the offense or a result that is an element of the offense occurred. (2) All objections of improper place of trial are waived by a defendant unless the defendant objects in the manner set forth in ORS 131.335 to 131.363. [1973 c.836 §14]
OR Rev Stat § 131.325 (2021)
2021 Oregon Revised Statutes|Volume : 04 - Criminal Procedure, Crimes|Chapter 131 - Preliminary Provisions; Limitations; Jurisdiction; Venue; Criminal Forfeiture; Crime Prevention|Section 131.325 - Place of trial; doubt as to place of crime; conduct outside of state.

If an offense is committed within the state and it cannot readily be determined within which county the commission took place, or a statute that governs conduct outside the state is violated, trial may be held in the county in which the defendant resides, or if the defendant has no fixed residence in this state, in the county in which the defendant is apprehended or to which the defendant is extradited. [1973 c.836 §16]
OR Rev Stat § 131.335 (2021)
2021 Oregon Revised Statutes|Volume : 04 - Criminal Procedure, Crimes|Chapter 131 - Preliminary Provisions; Limitations; Jurisdiction; Venue; Criminal Forfeiture; Crime Prevention|Section 131.335 - Change of venue.

In accordance with ORS 131.345 to 131.415, the defendant in a criminal action may have the place of trial changed only once, except for causes arising after the first change was allowed. [1973 c.836 §17]
OR Rev Stat § 131.345 (2021)
2021 Oregon Revised Statutes|Volume : 04 - Criminal Procedure, Crimes|Chapter 131 - Preliminary Provisions; Limitations; Jurisdiction; Venue; Criminal Forfeiture; Crime Prevention|Section 131.345 - Motion for change of venue; when made.

A motion for change of venue may be made in any criminal action in a circuit court when the case is at issue upon a question of fact. [1973 c.836 §18]
OR Rev Stat § 131.355 (2021)
2021 Oregon Revised Statutes|Volume : 04 - Criminal Procedure, Crimes|Chapter 131 - Preliminary Provisions; Limitations; Jurisdiction; Venue; Criminal Forfeiture; Crime Prevention|Section 131.355 - Change of venue for prejudice.

The court, upon motion of the defendant, shall order the place of trial to be changed to another county if the court is satisfied that there exists in the county where the action is commenced so great a prejudice against the defendant that the defendant cannot obtain a fair and impartial trial. [1973 c.836 §19]
OR Rev Stat § 131.363 (2021)
2021 Oregon Revised Statutes|Volume : 04 - Criminal Procedure, Crimes|Chapter 131 - Preliminary Provisions; Limitations; Jurisdiction; Venue; Criminal Forfeiture; Crime Prevention|Section 131.363 - Change of venue in other cases.

For the convenience of parties and witnesses, and in the interest of justice, the court, upon motion of the defendant, may order the place of trial to be changed to another county. [1973 c.836 §20]
OR Rev Stat § 131.375 (2021)
2021 Oregon Revised Statutes|Volume : 04 - Criminal Procedure, Crimes|Chapter 131 - Preliminary Provisions; Limitations; Jurisdiction; Venue; Criminal Forfeiture; Crime Prevention|Section 131.375 - Notification on change of venue.

When the court has ordered a change of venue, the clerk shall notify the clerk of the proper court. [1973 c.836 §21; 2017 c.252 §13]
OR Rev Stat § 131.385 (2021)
2021 Oregon Revised Statutes|Volume : 04 - Criminal Procedure, Crimes|Chapter 131 - Preliminary Provisions; Limitations; Jurisdiction; Venue; Criminal Forfeiture; Crime Prevention|Section 131.385 - When change of venue is complete.

The change of the place of trial is complete upon entry of an order changing the place of trial, and thereafter the action shall proceed in the same manner as if it had been commenced in the court to which the trial is transferred. [1973 c.836 §22; 2017 c.252 §14]
OR Rev Stat § 131.395 (2021)
2021 Oregon Revised Statutes|Volume : 04 - Criminal Procedure, Crimes|Chapter 131 - Preliminary Provisions; Limitations; Jurisdiction; Venue; Criminal Forfeiture; Crime Prevention|Section 131.395 - Expenses of change; taxation as costs.

(1) The expenses of the change of place of trial under ORS 131.363 shall be taxed, as allowed by law, as expenses of the action, and the costs and expenses of the action shall be taxed in the court and paid by the county wherein the trial is held. If the costs and expenses are not recovered from the defendant, the county in which the action was commenced shall repay the county in which the trial is held. (2) The expenses of a change of place of trial under ORS 131.355 shall not be taxed against the defendant. [1973 c.836 §23]
OR Rev Stat § 131.405 (2021)
2021 Oregon Revised Statutes|Volume : 04 - Criminal Procedure, Crimes|Chapter 131 - Preliminary Provisions; Limitations; Jurisdiction; Venue; Criminal Forfeiture; Crime Prevention|Section 131.405 - Attendance of defendant at new place of trial.

(1) When the court has ordered a change of place of trial, if the defendant has been released on security release, conditional release or recognizance, the defendant must, without further notice, appear at the time and place appointed for trial and not depart therefrom without permission of the court. (2) A security deposit is sufficient therefor in all respects as if the action had proceeded to final determination in the court where it was commenced. [1973 c.836 §24]
OR Rev Stat § 131.415 (2021)
2021 Oregon Revised Statutes|Volume : 04 - Criminal Procedure, Crimes|Chapter 131 - Preliminary Provisions; Limitations; Jurisdiction; Venue; Criminal Forfeiture; Crime Prevention|Section 131.415 - Conveyance of defendant in custody after change of venue.

When the court has ordered a change of place of trial, if the defendant is in custody, the clerk of the court shall issue an order to the sheriff of the county, directing the sheriff to safely convey the defendant and deliver the defendant to the custody of the executive head of the correctional institution of the county where the defendant is to be tried. [1973 c.836 §25]
OR Rev Stat § 131.505 (2021)
2021 Oregon Revised Statutes|Volume : 04 - Criminal Procedure, Crimes|Chapter 131 - Preliminary Provisions; Limitations; Jurisdiction; Venue; Criminal Forfeiture; Crime Prevention|Section 131.505 - Definitions for ORS 131.505 to 131.525.

As used in ORS 131.505 to 131.525, unless the context requires otherwise: (1) "Conduct" and "offense" have the meaning provided for those terms in ORS 161.085 and 161.505. (2) When the same conduct or criminal episode violates two or more statutory provisions, each such violation constitutes a separate and distinct offense. (3) When the same conduct or criminal episode, though violating only one statutory provision, results in death, injury, loss or other consequences of two or more victims, and the result is an element of the offense defined, there are as many offenses as there are victims. (4) "Criminal episode" means continuous and uninterrupted conduct that establishes at least one offense and is so joined in time, place and circumstances that such conduct is directed to the accomplishment of a single criminal objective. (5) A person is "prosecuted for an offense" when the person is charged therewith by an accusatory instrument filed in any court of this state or in any court of any political subdivision of this state, and when the action either: (a) Terminates in a conviction upon a plea of guilty, except as provided in ORS 131.525 (2); (b) Proceeds to the trial stage and the jury is impaneled and sworn; or (c) Proceeds to the trial stage when a judge is the trier of fact and the first witness is sworn. (6) There is an "acquittal" if the prosecution results in a finding of not guilty by the trier of fact or in a determination that there is insufficient evidence to warrant a conviction. [1973 c.836 §26; 1983 c.509 §1; 2001 c.104 §42]
OR Rev Stat § 131.515 (2021)
2021 Oregon Revised Statutes|Volume : 04 - Criminal Procedure, Crimes|Chapter 131 - Preliminary Provisions; Limitations; Jurisdiction; Venue; Criminal Forfeiture; Crime Prevention|Section 131.515 - Previous prosecution; when a bar to second prosecution.

Except as provided in ORS 131.525 and 131.535: (1) No person shall be prosecuted twice for the same offense. (2) No person shall be separately prosecuted for two or more offenses based upon the same criminal episode, if the several offenses are reasonably known to the appropriate prosecutor at the time of commencement of the first prosecution and establish proper venue in a single court. (3) If a person is prosecuted for an offense consisting of different degrees, the conviction or acquittal resulting therefrom is a bar to a later prosecution for the same offense, for any inferior degree of the offense, for an attempt to commit the offense or for an offense necessarily included therein. (4) A finding of guilty of a lesser included offense on any count is an acquittal of the greater inclusive offense only as to that count. [1973 c.836 §27; 1997 c.511 §3]
OR Rev Stat § 131.525 (2021)
2021 Oregon Revised Statutes|Volume : 04 - Criminal Procedure, Crimes|Chapter 131 - Preliminary Provisions; Limitations; Jurisdiction; Venue; Criminal Forfeiture; Crime Prevention|Section 131.525 - Previous prosecution; when not a bar to subsequent prosecution.

(1) A previous prosecution is not a bar to a subsequent prosecution when the previous prosecution was properly terminated under any of the following circumstances: (a) The defendant consents to the termination or waives, by motion, by an appeal upon judgment of conviction, or otherwise, the right to object to termination. (b) The trial court finds that a termination, other than by judgment of acquittal, is necessary because: (A) It is physically impossible to proceed with the trial in conformity with law; or (B) There is a legal defect in the proceeding that would make any judgment entered upon a verdict reversible as a matter of law; or (C) Prejudicial conduct, in or outside the courtroom, makes it impossible to proceed with the trial without injustice to either the defendant or the state; or (D) The jury is unable to agree upon a verdict; or (E) False statements of a juror on voir dire prevent a fair trial. (c) When the former prosecution occurred in a court which lacked jurisdiction over the defendant or the offense. (d) When the subsequent prosecution was for an offense which was not consummated when the former prosecution began. (2) A plea of guilty or resulting judgment is not a bar under ORS 131.515 (2) to a subsequent prosecution under an accusatory instrument which is filed no later than 30 days after entry of the guilty plea. The defendant’s prior plea of guilty or resulting judgment, notwithstanding ORS 135.365, shall be vacated upon motion by the defendant if made within 30 days after defendant’s arraignment for the subsequent prosecution. The provisions of ORS 135.445 apply to such a vacated plea or resulting judgment and any statements made in relation to those proceedings. [1973 c.836 §28; 1983 c.509 §2]
OR Rev Stat § 131.535 (2021)
2021 Oregon Revised Statutes|Volume : 04 - Criminal Procedure, Crimes|Chapter 131 - Preliminary Provisions; Limitations; Jurisdiction; Venue; Criminal Forfeiture; Crime Prevention|Section 131.535 - Proceedings not constituting acquittal.

The following proceedings will not constitute an acquittal of the same offense: (1) If the defendant was formerly acquitted on the ground of a variance between the accusatory instrument and the proof; or (2) If the accusatory instrument was: (a) Dismissed upon a demurrer to its form or substance; (b) Dismissed upon any pretrial motion; or (c) Discharged for want of prosecution without a judgment of acquittal. [1973 c.836 §29; 2001 c.104 §43]