reglab/housing_qa huggingface dataset:
WA Rev Code § 62A.9A-325 (2021)
2021 Revised Code of Washington|Title 62A - Uniform Commercial Code|Chapter 62A.9A - Secured Transactions; Sales of Accounts, Contract Rights and Chattel Paper.|62A.9A-325 - Priority of security interests in transferred collateral.

RCW 62A.9A-325 Priority of security interests in transferred collateral.(a) Subordination of security interest in transferred collateral. Except as otherwise provided in subsection (b) of this section, a security interest created by a debtor is subordinate to a security interest in the same collateral created by another person if:(1) The debtor acquired the collateral subject to the security interest created by the other person;(2) The security interest created by the other person was perfected when the debtor acquired the collateral; and(3) There is no period thereafter when the security interest is unperfected.(b) Limitation of subsection (a) of this section subordination. Subsection (a) of this section subordinates a security interest only if the security interest:(1) Otherwise would have priority solely under RCW 62A.9A-322(a) or 62A.9A-324; or(2) Arose solely under RCW 62A.2-711(3) or 62A.2A-508(5).[2000 c 250 § 9A-325.]
WA Rev Code § 62A.9A-326 (2021)
2021 Revised Code of Washington|Title 62A - Uniform Commercial Code|Chapter 62A.9A - Secured Transactions; Sales of Accounts, Contract Rights and Chattel Paper.|62A.9A-326 - Priority of security interests created by new debtor.

RCW 62A.9A-326 Priority of security interests created by new debtor.(a) Subordination of security interest created by new debtor. Subject to subsection (b) of this section, a security interest that is created by a new debtor in collateral in which the new debtor has or acquires rights and is perfected solely by a filed financing statement that would be ineffective to perfect the security interest but for the application of RCW 62A.9A-316(i)(1) or 62A.9A-508 is subordinate to a security interest in the same collateral which is perfected other than by such a filed financing statement.(b) Priority under other provisions; multiple original debtors. The other provisions of this part determine the priority among conflicting security interests in the same collateral perfected by filed financing statements described in subsection (a) of this section. However, if the security agreements to which a new debtor became bound as debtor were not entered into by the same original debtor, the conflicting security interests rank according to priority in time of the new debtor's having become bound.[ 2011 c 74 § 205; 2000 c 250 § 9A-326.]NOTES:Application—Effective date—2011 c 74: See notes following RCW 62A.9A-102.
WA Rev Code § 62A.9A-327 (2021)
2021 Revised Code of Washington|Title 62A - Uniform Commercial Code|Chapter 62A.9A - Secured Transactions; Sales of Accounts, Contract Rights and Chattel Paper.|62A.9A-327 - Priority of security interests in deposit account.

RCW 62A.9A-327 Priority of security interests in deposit account.The following rules govern priority among conflicting security interests in the same deposit account:(1) A security interest held by a secured party having control of the deposit account under RCW 62A.9A-104 has priority over a conflicting security interest held by a secured party that does not have control.(2) Except as otherwise provided in [subsections] (3) and (4) of this section, security interests perfected by control under RCW 62A.9A-314 rank according to priority in time of obtaining control.(3) Except as otherwise provided in [subsection] (4) of this section, a security interest held by the bank with which the deposit account is maintained has priority over a conflicting security interest held by another secured party.(4) A security interest perfected by control under RCW 62A.9A-104(a)(3) has priority over a security interest held by the bank with which the deposit account is maintained.[2000 c 250 § 9A-327.]
WA Rev Code § 62A.9A-328 (2021)
2021 Revised Code of Washington|Title 62A - Uniform Commercial Code|Chapter 62A.9A - Secured Transactions; Sales of Accounts, Contract Rights and Chattel Paper.|62A.9A-328 - Priority of security interests in investment property.

RCW 62A.9A-328 Priority of security interests in investment property.The following rules govern priority among conflicting security interests in the same investment property:(1) A security interest held by a secured party having control of investment property under RCW 62A.9A-106 has priority over a security interest held by a secured party that does not have control of the investment property.(2) Except as otherwise provided in subsections (3) and (4) of this section, conflicting security interests held by secured parties each of which has control under RCW 62A.9A-106 rank according to priority in time of:(A) If the collateral is a security, obtaining control;(B) If the collateral is a security entitlement carried in a securities account and:(i) If the secured party obtained control under RCW 62A.8-106(4)(a), the secured party's becoming the person for which the securities account is maintained;(ii) If the secured party obtained control under RCW 62A.8-106(4)(b), the securities intermediary's agreement to comply with the secured party's entitlement orders with respect to security entitlements carried or to be carried in the securities account; or(iii) If the secured party obtained control through another person under RCW 62A.8-106(4)(c), the time on which priority would be based under this paragraph if the other person were the secured party; or(C) If the collateral is a commodity contract carried with a commodity intermediary, the satisfaction of the requirement for control specified in RCW 62A.9A-106(b)(2) with respect to commodity contracts carried or to be carried with the commodity intermediary.(3) A security interest held by a securities intermediary in a security entitlement or a securities account maintained with the securities intermediary has priority over a conflicting security interest held by another secured party.(4) A security interest held by a commodity intermediary in a commodity contract or a commodity account maintained with the commodity intermediary has priority over a conflicting security interest held by another secured party.(5) A security interest in a certificated security in registered form which is perfected by taking delivery under RCW 62A.9A-313(a) and not by control under RCW 62A.9A-314 has priority over a conflicting security interest perfected by a method other than control.(6) Conflicting security interests created by a broker, securities intermediary, or commodity intermediary which are perfected without control under RCW 62A.9A-106 rank equally.(7) In all other cases, priority among conflicting security interests in investment property is governed by RCW 62A.9A-322 and 62A.9A-323.[ 2011 c 74 § 712; 2001 c 32 § 29; 2000 c 250 § 9A-328.]NOTES:Application—Effective date—2011 c 74: See notes following RCW 62A.9A-102.Effective date—2001 c 32: See note following RCW 62A.9A-102.
WA Rev Code § 62A.9A-329 (2021)
2021 Revised Code of Washington|Title 62A - Uniform Commercial Code|Chapter 62A.9A - Secured Transactions; Sales of Accounts, Contract Rights and Chattel Paper.|62A.9A-329 - Priority of security interests in letter-of-credit right.

RCW 62A.9A-329 Priority of security interests in letter-of-credit right.The following rules govern priority among conflicting security interests in the same letter-of-credit right:(1) A security interest held by a secured party having control of the letter-of-credit right under RCW 62A.9A-107 has priority to the extent of its control over a conflicting security interest held by a secured party that does not have control.(2) Security interests perfected by control under RCW 62A.9A-314 rank according to priority in time of obtaining control.[2000 c 250 § 9A-329.]
WA Rev Code § 62A.9A-330 (2021)
2021 Revised Code of Washington|Title 62A - Uniform Commercial Code|Chapter 62A.9A - Secured Transactions; Sales of Accounts, Contract Rights and Chattel Paper.|62A.9A-330 - Priority of purchaser of chattel paper or instrument.

RCW 62A.9A-330 Priority of purchaser of chattel paper or instrument.(a) Purchaser's priority: Security interest claimed merely as proceeds. A purchaser of chattel paper has priority over a security interest in the chattel paper which is claimed merely as proceeds of inventory subject to a security interest if:(1) In good faith and in the ordinary course of the purchaser's business, the purchaser gives new value and takes possession of the chattel paper or obtains control of the chattel paper under RCW 62A.9A-105; and(2) The chattel paper does not indicate that it has been assigned to an identified assignee other than the purchaser.(b) Purchaser's priority: Other security interests.A purchaser of chattel paper has priority over a security interest in the chattel paper which is claimed other than merely as proceeds of inventory subject to a security interest if the purchaser gives new value and takes possession of the chattel paper or obtains control of the chattel paper under RCW 62A.9A-105 in good faith, in the ordinary course of the purchaser's business, and without knowledge that the purchase violates the rights of the secured party.(c) Chattel paper purchaser's priority in proceeds.Except as otherwise provided in RCW 62A.9A-327, a purchaser having priority in chattel paper under subsection (a) or (b) of this section also has priority in proceeds of the chattel paper to the extent that:(1) RCW 62A.9A-322 provides for priority in the proceeds; or(2) The proceeds consist of the specific goods covered by the chattel paper or cash proceeds of the specific goods, even if the purchaser's security interest in the proceeds is unperfected.(d) Instrument purchaser's priority. Except as otherwise provided in RCW 62A.9A-331(a), a purchaser of an instrument has priority over a security interest in the instrument perfected by a method other than possession if the purchaser gives value and takes possession of the instrument in good faith and without knowledge that the purchase violates the rights of the secured party.(e) Holder of purchase-money security interest gives new value. For purposes of subsections (a) and (b) of this section, the holder of a purchase-money security interest in inventory gives new value for chattel paper constituting proceeds of the inventory.(f) Indication of assignment gives knowledge. For purposes of subsections (b) and (d) of this section, if chattel paper or an instrument indicates that it has been assigned to an identified secured party other than the purchaser, a purchaser of the chattel paper or instrument has knowledge that the purchase violates the rights of the secured party.[2000 c 250 § 9A-330.]
WA Rev Code § 62A.9A-331 (2021)
2021 Revised Code of Washington|Title 62A - Uniform Commercial Code|Chapter 62A.9A - Secured Transactions; Sales of Accounts, Contract Rights and Chattel Paper.|62A.9A-331 - Priority of rights of purchasers of instruments, documents, and securities under other articles; priority of interests in financial assets and security entitlements under Article 8.

RCW 62A.9A-331 Priority of rights of purchasers of instruments, documents, and securities under other articles; priority of interests in financial assets and security entitlements under Article 8.(a) Rights under Articles 3, 7, and 8 not limited. This Article does not limit the rights of a holder in due course of a negotiable instrument, a holder to which a negotiable document of title has been duly negotiated, or a protected purchaser of a security. These holders or purchasers take priority over an earlier security interest, even if perfected, to the extent provided in Articles 3, 7, and 8.(b) Protection under Article 8. This Article does not limit the rights of or impose liability on a person to the extent that the person is protected against the assertion of a claim under Article 8.(c) Filing not notice. Filing under this Article does not constitute notice of a claim or defense to the holders, or purchasers, or persons described in subsections (a) and (b) of this section.[ 2001 c 32 § 30; 2000 c 250 § 9A-331.]NOTES:Effective date—2001 c 32: See note following RCW 62A.9A-102.
WA Rev Code § 62A.9A-332 (2021)
2021 Revised Code of Washington|Title 62A - Uniform Commercial Code|Chapter 62A.9A - Secured Transactions; Sales of Accounts, Contract Rights and Chattel Paper.|62A.9A-332 - Transfer of money; transfer of funds from deposit account.

RCW 62A.9A-332 Transfer of money; transfer of funds from deposit account.(a) Transferee of money. A transferee of money takes the money free of a security interest unless the transferee acts in collusion with the debtor in violating the rights of the secured party.(b) Transferee of funds from deposit account. A transferee of funds from a deposit account takes the funds free of a security interest in the deposit account unless the transferee acts in collusion with the debtor in violating the rights of the secured party.[2000 c 250 § 9A-332.]
WA Rev Code § 62A.9A-333 (2021)
2021 Revised Code of Washington|Title 62A - Uniform Commercial Code|Chapter 62A.9A - Secured Transactions; Sales of Accounts, Contract Rights and Chattel Paper.|62A.9A-333 - Priority of certain liens arising by operation of law.

RCW 62A.9A-333 Priority of certain liens arising by operation of law.(a) "Possessory lien." In this section, "possessory lien" means an interest, other than a security interest or an agricultural lien:(1) Which secures payment or performance of an obligation for services or materials furnished with respect to goods by a person in the ordinary course of the person's business;(2) Which is created by statute or rule of law in favor of the person; and(3) Whose effectiveness depends on the person's possession of the goods.(b) Priority of possessory lien. A possessory lien on goods has priority over a security interest in the goods only if the lien is created by a statute that expressly so provides.(c) A preparer lien or processor lien properly created pursuant to chapter 60.13 RCW or a depositor's lien created pursuant to chapter 22.09 RCW takes priority over any perfected or unperfected security interest.[ 2001 c 32 § 31; 2000 c 250 § 9A-333.]NOTES:Effective date—2001 c 32: See note following RCW 62A.9A-102.
WA Rev Code § 62A.9A-335 (2021)
2021 Revised Code of Washington|Title 62A - Uniform Commercial Code|Chapter 62A.9A - Secured Transactions; Sales of Accounts, Contract Rights and Chattel Paper.|62A.9A-335 - Accessions.

RCW 62A.9A-335 Accessions.(a) Creation of security interest in accession. A security interest may be created in an accession and continues in collateral that becomes an accession.(b) Perfection of security interest. If a security interest is perfected when the collateral becomes an accession, the security interest remains perfected in the collateral.(c) Priority of security interest. Except as otherwise provided in subsection (d) of this section, the other provisions of this part determine the priority of a security interest in an accession.(d) Compliance with certificate-of-title statute. A security interest in an accession is subordinate to a security interest in the whole which is perfected by compliance with the requirements of a certificate-of-title statute under RCW 62A.9A-311(b).(e) Removal of accession after default. After default, subject to Part 6 of this Article, a secured party may remove an accession from other goods if the security interest in the accession has priority over the claims of every person having an interest in the whole.(f) Reimbursement following removal. A secured party that removes an accession from other goods under subsection (e) of this section shall promptly reimburse any holder of a security interest or other lien on, or owner of, the whole or of the other goods, other than the debtor, for the cost of repair of any physical injury to the whole or the other goods. The secured party need not reimburse the holder or owner for any diminution in value of the whole or the other goods caused by the absence of the accession removed or by any necessity for replacing it. A person entitled to reimbursement may refuse permission to remove until the secured party gives adequate assurance for the performance of the obligation to reimburse.[ 2011 c 74 § 713; 2000 c 250 § 9A-335.]NOTES:Application—Effective date—2011 c 74: See notes following RCW 62A.9A-102.
WA Rev Code § 62A.9A-336 (2021)
2021 Revised Code of Washington|Title 62A - Uniform Commercial Code|Chapter 62A.9A - Secured Transactions; Sales of Accounts, Contract Rights and Chattel Paper.|62A.9A-336 - Commingled goods.

RCW 62A.9A-336 Commingled goods.(a) "Commingled goods." In this section, "commingled goods" means goods that are physically united with other goods in such a manner that their identity is lost in a product or mass.(b) No security interest in commingled goods as such. A security interest does not exist in commingled goods as such. However, a security interest may attach to a product or mass that results when goods become commingled goods.(c) Attachment of security interest to product or mass. If collateral becomes commingled goods, a security interest attaches to the product or mass.(d) Perfection of security interest. If a security interest in collateral is perfected before the collateral becomes commingled goods, the security interest that attaches to the product or mass under subsection (c) of this section is perfected.(e) Priority of security interest. Except as otherwise provided in subsection (f) of this section, the other provisions of this part determine the priority of a security interest that attaches to the product or mass under subsection (c) of this section.(f) Conflicting security interests in product or mass. If more than one security interest attaches to the product or mass under subsection (c) of this section, the following rules determine priority:(1) A security interest that is perfected under subsection (d) of this section has priority over a security interest that is unperfected at the time the collateral becomes commingled goods.(2) If more than one security interest is perfected under subsection (d) of this section, the security interests rank equally in proportion to the value of the collateral at the time it became commingled goods.[ 2001 c 32 § 33; 2000 c 250 § 9A-336.]NOTES:Effective date—2001 c 32: See note following RCW 62A.9A-102.
WA Rev Code § 62A.9A-337 (2021)
2021 Revised Code of Washington|Title 62A - Uniform Commercial Code|Chapter 62A.9A - Secured Transactions; Sales of Accounts, Contract Rights and Chattel Paper.|62A.9A-337 - Priority of security interests in goods covered by certificate of title.

RCW 62A.9A-337 Priority of security interests in goods covered by certificate of title.If, while a security interest in goods is perfected by any method under the law of another jurisdiction, this state issues a certificate of title that does not show that the goods are subject to the security interest or contain a statement that they may be subject to security interests not shown on the certificate:(1) A buyer of the goods, other than a person in the business of selling goods of that kind, takes free of the security interest if the buyer gives value and receives delivery of the goods after issuance of the certificate and without knowledge of the security interest; and(2) The security interest is subordinate to a conflicting security interest in the goods that attaches, and is perfected under RCW 62A.9A-311(b), after issuance of the certificate and without the conflicting secured party's knowledge of the security interest.[ 2011 c 74 § 714; 2000 c 250 § 9A-337.]NOTES:Application—Effective date—2011 c 74: See notes following RCW 62A.9A-102.
WA Rev Code § 62A.9A-338 (2021)
2021 Revised Code of Washington|Title 62A - Uniform Commercial Code|Chapter 62A.9A - Secured Transactions; Sales of Accounts, Contract Rights and Chattel Paper.|62A.9A-338 - Priority of security interest or agricultural lien perfected by filed financing statement providing certain incorrect information.

RCW 62A.9A-338 Priority of security interest or agricultural lien perfected by filed financing statement providing certain incorrect information.If a security interest or agricultural lien is perfected by a filed financing statement providing information described in RCW 62A.9A-516(b)(5) which is incorrect at the time the financing statement is filed:(1) The security interest or agricultural lien is subordinate to a conflicting perfected security interest in the collateral to the extent that the holder of the conflicting security interest gives value in reasonable reliance upon the incorrect information; and(2) A purchaser, other than a secured party, of the collateral takes free of the security interest or agricultural lien to the extent that, in reasonable reliance upon the incorrect information, the purchaser gives value and, in the case of tangible chattel paper, tangible documents, goods, instruments, or a security certificate, receives delivery of the collateral.[ 2012 c 214 § 1516; (2012 c 214 § 1515 expired July 1, 2013); 2011 c 74 § 715; 2000 c 250 § 9A-338.]NOTES:Effective date—2012 c 214 §§ 902, 1403, 1502, 1508, 1511, 1514, 1516, and 1518: See note following RCW 62A.2A-103.Expiration date—2012 c 214 §§ 901, 1402, 1501, 1507, 1510, 1513, 1515, and 1517: See note following RCW 62A.2A-103.Application—Savings—2012 c 214: See notes following RCW 62A.1-101.Application—Effective date—2011 c 74: See notes following RCW 62A.9A-102.
WA Rev Code § 62A.9A-339 (2021)
2021 Revised Code of Washington|Title 62A - Uniform Commercial Code|Chapter 62A.9A - Secured Transactions; Sales of Accounts, Contract Rights and Chattel Paper.|62A.9A-339 - Priority subject to subordination.

RCW 62A.9A-339 Priority subject to subordination.This Article does not preclude subordination by agreement by a person entitled to priority.[2000 c 250 § 9A-339.]
WA Rev Code § 62A.9A-340 (2021)
2021 Revised Code of Washington|Title 62A - Uniform Commercial Code|Chapter 62A.9A - Secured Transactions; Sales of Accounts, Contract Rights and Chattel Paper.|62A.9A-340 - Effectiveness of right of recoupment or set-off against deposit account.

RCW 62A.9A-340 Effectiveness of right of recoupment or set-off against deposit account.(a) Exercise of recoupment or set-off. Except as otherwise provided in subsection (c) of this section, a bank with which a deposit account is maintained may exercise any right of recoupment or set-off against a secured party that holds a security interest in the deposit account.(b) Recoupment or set-off not affected by security interest. Except as otherwise provided in subsection (c) of this section, the application of this Article to a security interest in a deposit account does not affect a right of recoupment or set-off of the secured party as to a deposit account maintained with the secured party.(c) When set-off ineffective. The exercise by a bank of a set-off against a deposit account is ineffective against a secured party that holds a security interest in the deposit account which is perfected by control under RCW 62A.9A-104(a)(3), if the set-off is based on a claim against the debtor.[2000 c 250 § 9A-340.]
WA Rev Code § 62A.9A-341 (2021)
2021 Revised Code of Washington|Title 62A - Uniform Commercial Code|Chapter 62A.9A - Secured Transactions; Sales of Accounts, Contract Rights and Chattel Paper.|62A.9A-341 - Bank's rights and duties with respect to deposit account.

RCW 62A.9A-341 Bank's rights and duties with respect to deposit account.Except as otherwise provided in RCW 62A.9A-340(c), and unless the bank otherwise agrees in an authenticated record, a bank's rights and duties with respect to a deposit account maintained with the bank are not terminated, suspended, or modified by:(1) The creation, attachment, or perfection of a security interest in the deposit account;(2) The bank's knowledge of the security interest; or(3) The bank's receipt of instructions from the secured party.[2000 c 250 § 9A-341.]