CT Gen Stat § 46b-37. (Formerly Sec. 46-10) (2020)
2020 Connecticut General Statutes|Title 46b - Family Law|Chapter 815e - Marriage|Section 46b-37. (Formerly Sec. 46-10) - Joint duty of spouses to support family. Liability for purchases and certain expenses. Abandonment.

 (a) Any purchase made by either a husband or wife in his or her own name shall be presumed, in the absence of notice to the contrary, to be made by him or her as an individual and he or she shall be liable for the purchase.(b) Notwithstanding the provisions of subsection (a) of this section, it shall be the joint duty of each spouse to support his or her family, and both shall be liable for: (1) The reasonable and necessary services of a physician or dentist; (2) hospital expenses rendered the husband or wife or minor child while residing in the family of his or her parents; (3) the rental of any dwelling unit actually occupied by the husband and wife as a residence and reasonably necessary to them for that purpose; and (4) any article purchased by either which has in fact gone to the support of the family, or for the joint benefit of both.(c) Notwithstanding the provisions of subsection (a) of this section, a spouse who abandons his or her spouse without cause shall be liable for the reasonable support of such other spouse while abandoned.(d) No action may be maintained against either spouse under the provisions of this section, either during or after any period of separation from the other spouse, for any liability incurred by the other spouse during the separation, if, during the separation the spouse who is liable for support of the other spouse has provided the other spouse with reasonable support.(e) Abandonment without cause by a spouse shall be a defense to any liability pursuant to the provisions of subdivisions (1) to (4), inclusive, of subsection (b) of this section for expenses incurred by and for the benefit of such spouse. Nothing in this subsection shall affect the duty of a parent to support his or her minor child.(1949 Rev., S. 7308; 1957, P.A. 191; P.A. 77-288, S. 1; P.A. 78-230, S. 17, 54; P.A. 88-364, S. 58, 123; P.A. 92-140; P.A. 01-195, S. 35, 181.)History: P.A. 77-288 rephrased section, referring to spouse where previously either husband or wife was specified, added exception re liability for expenses of last illness of deceased spouse and deleted provision which required that husband's property be first applied to support family and entitled wife to indemnity from husband's property for any of her property which was taken or money she was compelled to pay for satisfaction of claims; P.A. 78-230 divided section into Subsecs., rearranging and restating provisions, and deleted provision re liability for expenses of last illness; Sec. 46-10 transferred to Sec. 46b-37 in 1979; P.A. 88-364 changed the first word of Subsec. (a) from “all” to “any”; P.A. 92-140 deleted former Subdivs. (5) and (6) of Subsec. (b), inserted new Subsec. (c) re liability of spouse who abandons spouse without cause, relettering former Subsec. (c) as (d), and added Subsec. (e) re abandonment by spouse as defense to expenses; P.A. 01-195 made a technical change in Subsec. (b) for purposes of gender neutrality, effective July 11, 2001.Annotations to former section 46-10:Not necessary to first obtain judgment against husband, and have execution returned unsatisfied; plaintiff may sue on implied promise created by statute. 52 C. 406. Father not obliged to support child unlawfully detained by mother. 68 C. 256. Liability of husband for goods purchased for family not limited to those necessary or reasonable. 77 C. 390; 93 C. 453; Id., 515. Husband is liable for wife's reasonable apparel even though he has not abandoned her. 93 C. 515. That goods were purchased by wife in foreign country is immaterial. Id., 516. “While abandoned by her husband” qualifies next preceding clause only. Id., 515; 94 C. 267. If goods in fact went to support of family, husband's prior notice to seller not to extend credit to wife is no defense. Id., 267. Whether a plastic surgery operation to improve husband's facial appearance is a “reasonable and necessary” expense depends on all circumstances. 100 C. 168. Common law liability to provide necessaries to wife exists independently of statute; scope thereof. 102 C. 705. Necessary allegations in action on statute. Id., 706. Cited. 108 C. 730. Wife is not jointly responsible for every business obligation husband undertakes. 111 C. 306; 115 C. 295; 131 C. 156; 134 C. 332; 142 C. 375; Id., 553; 143 C. 443; 144 C. 21. There must be a direct relationship between article purchased and the family benefit. 121 C. 663; 124 C. 249. Under former statute, it was immaterial that husband supported wife. 112 C. 64. “Family” includes wife. Id.; 131 C. 156. In tort action, husband entitled to medical expenses for wife's injuries, both past and future. 122 C. 338. Statute does not make wife guarantor but may make her liable on an implied promise; husband has primary obligation to support and may be liable to wife for past support; her claim is legal rather than equitable and 6-year limitation applies. 124 C. 251. Payment by husband did not toll statute of limitations as to wife. 125 C. 202. However, in suit by wife against husband, she may recover such expenses if creditors look to her for payment. 126 C. 146. Her claim not defeated by reason of having private means. 132 C. 80. Three bases of recovery when creditor sues husband for goods furnished wife. Id., 77. If wife lives apart without justification, husband's obligation to support is suspended. 136 C. 685. Husband and wife cannot make contract with each other concerning maintenance or custody of child which court is compelled to enforce. 137 C. 74. Undertaker's services are not included in those purchases to which statute applies. Id., 450. Does not modify common law determining conditions excusing husband from obligation to support wife or child. 138 C. 6. Plaintiff not entitled to recover where her estate had not been depleted in any way and she had not expended money of her own for support. Id., 701. Husband must provide for his wife and child within the reasonable limits of his ability. 142 C. 553. Wife's doctors' bills cannot be recovered from husband as damages in tort action. 145 C. 663. Cited. 155 C. 545. In action by wife for indemnification of money paid out by her for support of herself and children, it is immaterial whether second ground for divorce was found where it was proved defendant had committed adultery and wife was fully justified in living apart from and divorcing him for that reason. 156 C. 628. Cited. 162 C. 546. Section does not exempt wife from any legal obligation towards family; husband has primary duty to support family, but wife is also liable for family expenses. 170 C. 258. Cited. 175 C. 527.Circumstances under which indemnity is available to wife under section. 3 CS 211. Cited. 4 CS 144. There is no statute of limitations affecting this claim. 5 CS 459. Recovery by wife for expenditures for support of the family allowed only for payments actually made. 7 CS 153; 17 CS 208. Wife's right to indemnity is not defeated because she has private means. 13 CS 474; 17 CS 189; 20 CS 9. Cited. 14 CS 128. Liability of husband and wife for medical and hospital expenses rendered a minor child living with them does not exclude a minor married child. 16 CS 84. Conditions under which wife living apart entitled to sums expended and to be expended by her for reasonable necessities for support of family. Id., 235. Cited. 17 CS 189. Where wife left husband without just cause and where her return to him was not in good faith, he was justified in living apart and equitable support was denied wife. 23 CS 221. In absence of divorce, husband has primary obligation of paying for support, medical care and burial of wife, and person advancing money for those purposes can recover from husband; such person has legally protected interest adversely affected by purported divorce decree and may therefore attack decree. Id., 306. Judgment against wife leaves unaffected right to indemnification from husband. 30 CS 593. Wife may sue for husband's medical expenses for which she is liable. 32 CS 156. Liability for certain expenses. 33 CS 44.Annotations to present section:Cited. 186 C. 167; 200 C. 290. Abandonment is a defense to liability. 206 C. 31. Cited. 234 C. 194; 235 C. 82.Cited. 3 CA 392; 21 CA 200; 26 CA 737.Cited. 44 CS 169; 45 CS 84.Subsec. (b):Subdiv. (4): Spousal liability does not include nursing home expenses or services or expenses associated with nursing home care, including food and medicine consumed by a nursing home resident. 299 C. 819.