Conversation so far:
What did Wilhelm Stekel say about fetishes?
[Normal fetishes] become pathological only when they have pushed the whole love object into the background and themselves appropriate the function of a love object“
What else did Wilhelm Stekel say about fetishes besides [Normal fetishes] become pathological only when they have pushed the whole love object into the background and themselves appropriate the function of a love object“?
Wilhelm Stekel holds that fetichism is the patient's unconscious religion.
Did Wilhelm Stekel have any more comments besides besides [Normal fetishes] become pathological only when they have pushed the whole love object into the background and themselves appropriate the function of a love object“ and 'fetichism is the patient's unconscious religion'?
Normal fetishes for Wilhelm Stekel contributed more broadly to choice of lifestyle: thus choice of vocation was actually an attempt to solve mental conflicts through the displacement of them“.

Question: What did he say next about fetishes?
Self-contained rewrite: What did Wilhelm Stekel say next about fetishes besides normal fetishes contribute more broadly to choice of lifestyle, [Normal fetishes] become pathological only when they have pushed the whole love object into the background and themselves appropriate the function of a love object“ and 'fetichism is the patient's unconscious religion'?