Conversation so far:
What did Wilhelm Stekel say about fetishes?
[Normal fetishes] become pathological only when they have pushed the whole love object into the background and themselves appropriate the function of a love object“
What else did Wilhelm Stekel say about fetishes besides [Normal fetishes] become pathological only when they have pushed the whole love object into the background and themselves appropriate the function of a love object“?
Wilhelm Stekel holds that fetichism is the patient's unconscious religion.
Did Wilhelm Stekel have any more comments besides besides [Normal fetishes] become pathological only when they have pushed the whole love object into the background and themselves appropriate the function of a love object“ and 'fetichism is the patient's unconscious religion'?
Normal fetishes for Wilhelm Stekel contributed more broadly to choice of lifestyle: thus choice of vocation was actually an attempt to solve mental conflicts through the displacement of them“.
What did Wilhelm Stekel say next about fetishes besides normal fetishes contribute more broadly to choice of lifestyle, [Normal fetishes] become pathological only when they have pushed the whole love object into the background and themselves appropriate the function of a love object“ and 'fetichism is the patient's unconscious religion'?
On sado-masochism, Wilhelm Stekel has described the essence of the sadomasochistic act to be humiliation.

Question: Did he have any other thoughts on this topic?
Self-contained rewrite: Did Wilhelm Stekel have any other thoughts on fetishes besides the essence of the sadomasochistic act to be humiliation, normal fetishes contribute more broadly to choice of lifestyle, [Normal fetishes] become pathological only when they have pushed the whole love object into the background and themselves appropriate the function of a love object“ and 'fetichism is the patient's unconscious religion'?