Conversation so far:
Who criticized Richard Pipes' approach?
The writings of Richard Pipes have provoked criticism in the scholarly community, for example in The Russian Review
Who was Richard Pipes?
Richard Pipes was an American academic who specialized in Russian history, particularly with respect to the Soviet Union, who espoused a strong anti-communist point of view throughout his career
What was notable out Richard Pipes' approach?
Critics have written that Pipes wrote at length about what Pipes described as Lenin's unspoken assumptions and conclusions while neglecting what Lenin actually said
How did Richard Pipes answer his critics?
Pipes, in his turn – following the demise of the USSR – charged the revisionists with skewing their research, by means of statistics, to support their preconceived ideological interpretation of events
What was Richard Pipes' advice regarding the USSR?
He argued that the National Intelligence Estimate on the Soviet Union, generated yearly by the CIA, underestimated both Soviet military strategy and ambition, and misinterpreted Soviet strategic intentions
How did the CIA view Richard Pipes?
Then director, George H. W. Bush, concluded Team B lead by Richard Pipes' approach set in motion a process that lends itself to manipulation for purposes other than estimative accuracy.“
How did others in CIA view Pipes besides then CIA director George H. W. Bush?
A top CIA analyst called Team B a kangaroo court of outside critics all picked from one point of view.“
Are there any other interesting aspects about this article, besides who Richard Pipes was, what his critics said, and how the CIA viewed him?
Lynne Viola and Sheila Fitzpatrick write that Pipes focused too narrowly on intellectuals as causal agents
What was the result of Richard Pipes' narrow focus on intellectuals?
Peter Kenez argued that Pipes approached Soviet History as a prosecutor, intent solely on proving the criminal intent of the defendant, to the exclusion of anything else.

Question: What else can you tell me about Peter Kenez?
Self-contained rewrite: What else can you tell me about Peter Kenez besides arguing that Pipes approached Soviet History as a prosecutor, intent solely on proving the criminal intent of the defendant, to the exclusion of anything else?