Conversation so far:
What was the effect of the deerskin trade on Native Americans in North American fur trade?
The North American fur trade challenged Native American—specifically the Creek's—beliefs which revolved around respecting the environment.
Why was the Native American Creek really affected by the deerskin trade?
The Creek believed they had a unique relationship with the animals they hunted with several rules surround how a hunt could occur, particularly prohibiting needless killing of deer
What were some of these belief The Creek held with the animals they hunted in North American fur trade?
The Creek had several rules surround how a hunt could occur, particularly prohibiting needless killing of deer.
Was there anything else the Creek believed was unique about how they treated animals aside from prohibiting needless killing of deer?
The Creek had specific taboos against taking unhealthy deer skin. But the lucrative deerskin trade prompted hunters to act past the point of restraint they had operated under before.
Did anything happen to the Creek because of the lucrative deerskin trade prompted hunters to act past the point of restraint they had operated under before?

Question: What did the Creek do to adjust to the collapse of the hunting economy?
Self-contained rewrite: What did the Creek do to adjust to the collapse of the hunting economy due to the scarcity of deer as they were over-hunted and lost their lands to white settlers?