Conversation so far:
What was the controversy?
Natan-Zada's funeral was a controversial matter.
Why is that?
Jewish law requires a swift burial, but nationwide outrage against his attacks left his body without a willing resting place for two days.
When was he finally buried?
An initial agreement between IDF officials and the Natan-Zada family would have allowed burial in a military cemetery, but with no military honors such.
Did he get buried in a time frame acceptable to the Jewish culture?
The morgue which housed Natan-Zada's body, Abu Kabir Forensic Institute, refused to release the body to friends and fellow Kahane activists to bury, resulting in a bitter protest.
Did anything come of the protests?
Natan-Zada's body resided for two days in the Abu-Kabir morgue, pending an appeal to Prime Minister Sharon by his parents.
Was the appeal successful?
On 7 August 2005, the Prime Minister's Bureau overruled Meir Nitzan's ban against burial in Rishon LeZion, and decreed that Zada should be buried in the civilian cemetery there.
Are there any other interesting aspects about this article?
Three of the hundreds of mourners at the burial were arrested.

Question: why were they arrested?
Self-contained rewrite: Why were three of the mourners at Eden Natan-Zada's burial arrested?