Conversation so far:
What was pandora's hope?
Pandora's Hope (1999) marks a return to the themes Latour explored in Science in Action and We Have Never Been Modern.
What did Bruno say about these findings?
Latour states that this specific, anecdotal approach to science studies is essential to gaining a full understanding of the discipline: .
Did anyone oppose these views?
Some authors have criticized Latour's methodology, including Katherine Pandora, a history of science professor at the University of Oklahoma.
What did they oppose?
writing can be stimulating, fresh and at times genuinely moving, but it can also display a distractingly mannered style in which a rococo zeal for compounding metaphors.
Are there any other interesting aspects about this article?
After his early career efforts, Latour shifted his research interests to focus on laboratory scientists.
Latour rose in importance following the 1979 publication of Laboratory Life.
What did this research yield?
In the book, the authors undertake an ethnographic study of a neuroendocrinology research laboratory at the Salk Institute.

Question: Does anyone oppose their research?
Self-contained rewrite: Does anyone oppose Latour's author's research?