Conversation so far:
What did Wilhelm Stekel say about fetishes?
They become pathological only when they have pushed the whole love object into the background and themselves appropriate the function of a love object.
What else did he say?
when a lover satisfies himself with the possession of a woman's shoe and considers the woman herself as secondary or even disturbing and superfluous.
Did he have any more comments?
points out the significance of the repressed religious "self" in neuroses and indicates that apart from the repressed sexuality type, there is also a repressed morality type.

Question: What did he say next about fetishes?
Self-contained rewrite: What did Wilhelm Stekel say next about fetishes?