Conversation so far:
What does Roberto Mangabeira Unger have to say about economics?
At the center of Roberto Mangabeira Unger's thought about the economy is the commitment to reimagining and remaking the institutional arrangements of how humans produce and exchange.
What is Roberto Mangabeira Unger's key moment in economic history?
Roberto Mangabeira Unger's identification of a key moment is when the analysis of production and exchange turned away from social theory and engaged in a quest for scientific objectivity.
Are there any other interesting aspects about Roberto Mangabeira Unger's economic thoughts besides key moments?
In Roberto Mangabiera Unger's analysis, classical economics focused on the causal relations among social activities, which were connected with the production and distribution of wealth.
What else did Roberto Mangabeira Unger have to say of note about economics besides his analysis of classical economics?
In Roberto Mangabeira Unger's writings, he has aimed to revise ideas on the importance of market economies and the division of labor in the workplace and national and global economies.
What is the most fascinating aspect about Roberto Mangabeira Unger's economic thought and critique?
Roberto Mangabiera Unger's critique of Marginalism begins with Walras' equilibrium theory, which attempted to achieve a certainty of economic analysis by putting aside normative controversies of social organization.
What did Roberto Mangabeira Unger's critique of marginalism have to say?
Roberto Mangabeira Unger finds three weaknesses that crippled the theory.

Question: Why did he critique economics?
Self-contained rewrite: Why did Roberto Mangabeira Unger critique economics?