Conversation so far:
What did Wilhelm Stekel say about fetishes?
They become pathological only when they have pushed the whole love object into the background and themselves appropriate the function of a love object.
What else did he say?
when a lover satisfies himself with the possession of a woman's shoe and considers the woman herself as secondary or even disturbing and superfluous.

Question: Did he have any more comments?
Self-contained rewrite: Did Wilhelm Stekel have any more comments about fetishes?