Conversation so far:
What was the Stanford Experiment?
The Stanford Prison Experiment (SPE) was a social psychology experiment that attempted to investigate the psychological effects of perceived power, focusing on the struggle between prisoners and prison officers.
What did the Stanford Experiment show?
Zimbardo's Stanford prison experiment revealed how social roles can influence our behavior. ... The Stanford Prison Experiment was a landmark psychological study of the human response to captivity, in particular, to the real world circumstances of prison life.
Tell me about the author of the Stanford Experiment.
It was conducted at Stanford University on the days of August 14–20, 1971, by a research group led by psychology professor Philip Zimbardo using college students. In the study, volunteers were randomly assigned to be either guards or prisoners in a mock prison, with Zimbardo himself serving as the superintendent.
Was the Stanford Experiment ethical?
The study has received many ethical criticisms, including lack of fully informed consent by participants as Zimbardo himself did not know what would happen in the experiment (it was unpredictable). Also, the prisoners did not consent to being 'arrested' at home.
What are other similar experiments to the Stanford Experiment?
The Monster Study was conducted on twenty two orphaned children living at a veteran's orphanage. It was to establish a hypothesis regarding the origins of stuttering. Johnson was trying to induce stuttering into the speech of healthy children.
What happened in the Milgram experiment?
He conducted an experiment focusing on the conflict between obedience to authority and personal conscience. Milgram (1963) examined justifications for acts of genocide offered by those accused at the World War II, Nuremberg War Criminal trials.
Why was the Milgram experiment important?
These experiments laid the foundation for understanding why seemingly decent people could be encouraged to do bad things. ... Blass states that Milgram's obedience experiments are important because they provide a frame of reference for contemporary real-life instances of extreme, destructive obedience.
What were the similarities and differences between the Stanford Experiment and the Milgram experiment?
Designs of Milgram’s and Zimbardo’s researches as aimed to study experimentally humans’ ability to do damage and evil have been compared. It has been shown that diagnosing the ability to cause damage and do evil is always loaded with the researcher’s value-related and ethical ideas of what is proper, allowable or not allowable, and of the price that can be paid for the result.
What about the BBC experiment?
The BBC Prison Study explores the social and psychological consequences of putting people in groups of unequal power. It examines when people accept inequality and when they challenge it.
What are the key findings of the BBC experiment?
Our study showed that that there is a world of difference between someone imposing a group role upon you, and you seeing yourself in terms of that role. It is the difference between hearing ‘you are a Guard’ and thinking ‘I am a Guard’.
How did the results of the BBC experiment differ from the Milgram experiment?
We review these debates and argue that the main problem with received understandings of Milgram's work arises from seeing it as an exploration of obedience. Instead, we argue that it is better understood as providing insight into processes of engaged followership, in which people are prepared to harm others because they identify with their leaders' cause and believe their actions to be virtuous

Question: Why was it ended
Self-contained rewrite: Why was the BBC experiment ended?