Conversation so far:
What was Bruno Latour's Pandora's Hope?
Bruno Latour's book Pandora's Hope marks a return to the themes Latour explored in Science in Action and We Have Never Been Modern.
What did Bruno Latour say about findings in Pandora's Hope?
Latour states that this specific, anecdotal approach to science studies is essential to gaining a full understanding of the discipline.
Did anyone oppose Bruno Latour's views in Pandora's Hope?
Some authors have criticized Latour's methodology, including Katherine Pandora, a history of science professor at the University of Oklahoma.
What did some authors oppose about Latour's views in Pandora's Hope?
Some authors have criticized Latour's methodology.
Are there any other interesting aspects about Bruno Latour's book Pandora's Hope?
Latour uses a narrative, anecdotal approach in a number of the essays, describing research of French atomic scientists at the outbreak of the Second World War.
What did Bruno Latour's research of French atomic scientists at the outbreak of the Second World War yield?
Latour states that this specific, anecdotal approach to science studies is essential to gaining a full understanding of the discipline.
Does anyone oppose Bruno Latour's narrative on the French atomic scientists research at the outbreak of the Second World War?
Some authors have criticized Latour's methodology, including Katherine Pandora, a history of science professor at the University of Oklahoma.

Question: How does Latour counter that point?
Self-contained rewrite: How does Bruno Latour counter the opposing point on the French atomic scientists research at the outbreak of the Second World War?