Conversation so far:
What is Bruno Latour's article on Why Has Critique Run Out of Steam?“
Why Has Critique Run Out of Steam?, is a 2004 article in which Latour undertakes a trenchant critique of his own field of study and social criticism in contemporary academia.
Did Bruno Latour's article on critique correlate with his views on modernism?
Was anyone critical of Bruno Latour's ideas on modernism?
In 1998, historian of science Margaret C. Jacob argued that Latour's politicized account of the development of modernism in the 17th century is a fanciful escape from modern Western history.
Are there any other interesting aspects about the Bruno Latour article?
Latour attempted to prove through case studies the fallacy in the old object/subject and Nature/Society compacts of modernity, which can be traced back to Plato.
Does Bruno Latour go on to suggest how to support matters of concern in his article Why Has Critique Run Out of Steam?
Latour suggests the conclusion of the article is to argue for a positive framing of critique, to help understand how matters of concern can be supported rather than undermined.
How does Bruno Latour think critique is bordering on irrelevancy?
To maintain any vitality, Latour argues that social critiques require a drastic reappraisal: our critical equipment deserves as much critical scrutiny as the Pentagon budget.“

Question: What does he believe the critic is?
Self-contained rewrite: What does Bruno Latour believe the critique is?