Courts should also examine whether the nature of the crime and other evidence support " the ultimate conclusion that an inmate continues to pose an unreasonable risk to public safety . " The majority said that other evidence , such as the inmate 's prison record or his or her mental state or demeanor , should be considered in deciding whether the felon posed a safety threat . George said state law requires the parole board and the governor " to normally grant parole to life prisoners who have committed murder .

Question: What might one conclude about the information in the post ?
Answer: It is unreasonable to expect the parole board to have to read all the documents before deciding .The majority of the people think that everyone deserves parole at some time in their sentence .The people releasing a killer after decades in jail need to look at the ALL the risks .That courts should examine the fact that the prisoner may be too old to pose a risk to the public .