I use the following line to find all sub-directories of the PWD and run svnadmin verify on each directory (I already know that they're Subversion repositories)

find ./* -maxdepth 0 -exec svnadmin verify {} \;


This works well, other than the fact that the output looks like this:

* Verifying repository metadata ...
* Verifying metadata at revision 1 ...
* Verifying metadata at revision 2 ...
* Verifying metadata at revision 4 ...
* Verifying metadata at revision 5 ...
* Verifying metadata at revision 6 ...
* Verifying metadata at revision 9 ...
* Verifying metadata at revision 10 ...
* Verifying metadata at revision 12 ...
* Verifying metadata at revision 14 ...
* Verifying metadata at revision 15 ...
* Verifying metadata at revision 18 ...
* Verifying metadata at revision 20 ...
* Verifying metadata at revision 22 ...
* Verified revision 0.
* Verified revision 1.
* Verified revision 2.
* Verified revision 3.
* Verified revision 4.
* Verified revision 5.
* Verified revision 6.
* Verified revision 7.
* Verified revision 8.
* Verified revision 9.
* Verified revision 10.
* Verified revision 11.
* Verified revision 12.
* Verified revision 13.
* Verified revision 14.
* Verified revision 15.
* Verified revision 16.
* Verified revision 17.
* Verified revision 18.
* Verified revision 19.
* Verified revision 20.
* Verified revision 21.
* Verified revision 22.
* Verified revision 23.
* Verified revision 0.
* Verifying repository metadata ...
* Verifying metadata at revision 4 ...
* Verifying metadata at revision 5 ...
* Verifying metadata at revision 6 ...
* Verifying metadata at revision 7 ...
* Verifying metadata at revision 9 ...
* Verified revision 0.
* Verified revision 1.
* Verified revision 2.
* Verified revision 3.
* Verified revision 4.
* Verified revision 5.
* Verified revision 6.
* Verified revision 7.
* Verified revision 8.
* Verified revision 9.


I'd really like find to print the filename before executing the svnadmin verify command, to make logging easier.

I've tried to squeeze a little ls in there but bodged it up, how should I do this (preferably simply)?


Question: Good travel games for two players, especially for playing on trains?
Answer: I would suggest Cribbage. Not much space is required, it is quick to set up and put away, involves no more noise than any game between two players, and is a very good game. It is also best enjoyed with a glass of something in the other hand, increasing its suitability for a train journey.

If you don't know how to play (and it isn't terribly complicated, although rather different from other card games), have a look here... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cribbage