Any state
  that makes its choices after most others do will find itself playing in the
  late innings of a game, as the West Virginia Supreme Court found in a
  case about whether car makers were responsible if their vehicles failed to
  protect people who negligently got into accidents:
  
  
    ...[I]n some world other than the one in which we live, where this Court
    were called upon to make national policy, we might very well take a meat
    ax to some current product liability rules. Therefore, we do not claim that
    our adoption of rules liberal to plaintiffs comports[,] necessarily, with some
    Platonic ideal of perfect justice.
  


Source: p 124, The Legal Analyst, Ward Farnsworth

My guess is Definition 1.1 below. Yet is this use right? 


  Favourable to or respectful of individual rights and freedoms:


The definition concerns 'right and freedoms', while the context is individuals (as plaintiffs)


Question: pre hung doors to fit into old frame
Answer: Take off the trim, remove the old frame, install the new frame, re-install trim or install new trim. That, or re-use the existing frame by hanging the new door in it.