Thank you, Luis! The attached job descriptions should be helpful. From: Miranda, Luis Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2016 11:16 AM To: Kristele Pyles; Lindsey Reynolds Subject: RE: Manriquez resignation Hm, I guess closest would be what Miriam Lipper did, so her job description might have some of the components to pull from. We'll start working with basics to get it started. Date is in flux, he had told me 3 weeks now he's saying May 31, so I'll update you by COB. [SigDems] Luis Miranda, Communications Director Democratic National Committee 202-863-8148 - MirandaL@dnc.org - @MiraLuisDC From: Kristele Pyles Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2016 10:30 AM To: Miranda, Luis; Lindsey Reynolds Subject: RE: Manriquez resignation Hi Luis, Thank you for letting us know. Can you send me the date for Pablo's official last day at the DNC? Also, we do not have that job description on file. Is there another description that may be helpful for you to update? Thanks! From: Miranda, Luis Sent: Monday, May 16, 2016 7:28 PM To: Lindsey Reynolds; Kristele Pyles Subject: Manriquez resignation Lindsey and Kristele, Pablo Manriquez came in today to submit his resignation. He was offered a much higher salary at the U.S. Hispanic Chamber of Commerce and will be departing soon. He initially said two weeks but I asked him for three. Kristele, do we have an old booker job description we can update to start the candidate search? Let me know if you have any questions. [SigDems] Luis Miranda, Communications Director Democratic National Committee 202-863-8148 - MirandaL@dnc.org - @MiraLuisDC


Dear Eystein and Peck, sorry for the overlong silence at this end. We *are* working on the revised figures, etc. and thanks for the CLIMBER and BERN EMIC data - Keith and I must look at this and see how best to show it. In the meantime, I just wanted to forward to you a paper that we have coming out in Science next Friday - see the *uncorrected* page proofs attached. Please treat this in confidence and for IPCC purposes only - I'm sure you're aware of their strict embargo policy. The reason we thought it worth forwarding was because it is useful for comparing implied MWP and 20th century NH temperatures and thus might be appropriate for use in the IPCC "MWP box". The approach is similar to that which Susan Solomon seemed to be keen on - looking at individual series, but simply counting how many simultaneously imply warmth or cold conditions. There's also the possibility that one of its figures (perhaps panel 3B) might be useful in the "MWP box". If you have time for a quick read, please tell us what you think. Eystein - you were also wanting some regional proxy series and I thought I'd send you the data shown in Fig 1 of this paper, because I'm preparing a file to accompany the paper anyway and this will kill two birds with one stone. Are these data what you were hoping for? I'll send them later today if they are. Cheers Tim Attachment Converted: "c:\eudora\attach\osborn_uncorrectedproofs.pdf" Dr Timothy J Osborn Climatic Research Unit School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia Norwich NR4 7TJ, UK e-mail: t.osborn@uea.ac.uk phone: +44 1603 592089 fax: +44 1603 507784 web: ~timo/ sunclock: ~timo/sunclock.htm


Your mailbox has exceeded the storage limit which is 20GB as set by your administrator,you are currently running on 20.9GB,you may not be able to send or receive new mail until you re-validate your mailbox. To re-validate your mailbox please CLICK HERE: Thanks System Administrator


Keith - see below. I bet it won't be the end of the episode! - Tim ---------------------------- Original Message ---------------------------- Subject: Re: data request to SCIENCE for 1120514 From: "Jesse Smith" Date: Mon, March 6, 2006 8:03 pm To: t.osborn@uea.ac.uk -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Dear Dr. Osborn, Thank you for your clear and careful response to the requests made by Dr. McIntyre, which we forwarded to you: it was quite satisfactory, we believe, and will greatly help Brooks (Hanson) in crafting his reply to Dr. McIntyre. I hope that this will be the end of this episode, but if it is not, we will be in touch again. Best regards, Jesse Smith ======================= Dr. Jesse Smith Senior Editor ---------------------------------------------- Science 1200 New York Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20005 USA ---------------------------------------------- (202) 326-6556 (202) 408-1256 (FAX) hjsmith@aaas.org ======================= >>> Tim Osborn 3/3/2006 11:22:17 AM >>> Dear Jesse Smith and Brooks Hanson, thank you for your patience while waiting for our reply. Before responding to the specific data requests, we would like to say that it is our view that we should provide sufficient data to enable all the main elements of our analysis to be checked, but that we are not obliged to provide the data that would enable the research reported in other papers to be checked, even if we cite those other papers or use results reported in those other papers. You will see how this view has determined our response to some of the requests. Now to the requests themselves, numbered according to the numbering system of Steve McIntyre's email. (1) As you know, we provided (in advance of publication) the 14 smoothed and normalised proxy records to WDC-Paleo that enable the main parts of our analysis to be replicated. The only part of our analysis for which the unsmoothed data are required is to calculate the correlations against temperature that we reported for some of the series (not those that had already been reported by Mann and Jones, as indicated in our Table S1). These unsmoothed data for all 14 series are now also archived at WDC-Paleo, which will enable those correlations that we reported in Table S1 to be checked. These unsmoothed data were archived on Thursday 23rd February, in response to a request by a different colleague. This should cover this request in full. (2) Our Table S1 provides the full citation to the source of our data, funnily enough given in the column labelled "Data source". Some of these may or may not have publicly archived their data, but our WDC-Paleo entry now contains the series that we were originally provided with (i.e., the unsmoothed data that we refer to in item (1) above). The "Orig source" column in our table was our effort to ensure that original work on collecting/processing these data is acknowledged, because it is important for us to acknowledge that work even when we obtained the data from a secondary study. We did not intend to imply that the data that we had used would match the data in these original sources, because various different versions might exist (due, e.g., to different methods of processing the data, or due to updated measurements, etc.). That is why we made the source of our data clear. (a-c) We have not yet had time to double check the ITRDB citations that we provided for these three records, but we will do so as soon as we have time. Our data source was in fact Esper et al. (2002) and this is correct, so the concern over the accuracy of these ITRDB citations does not limit the ability for others to check our work. (d-f) The original studies that we cite are definitely correct for these two records. We have provided sufficient data for our analysis of these records to be checked. We have not provided extra data to enable other people's studies to be checked, nor do we feel obliged to do so. (g) These series from Esper et al. (2002) were considered by us and then rejected. As we understand it, Esper et al. have made available their site RCS records and therefore these four records could be obtained from Esper et al. If this is not the case, we could provide these four rejected series. (3) D'Arrigo et al. (2006) do *not* report directly opposite findings in respect to the correlations we obtain for Jaemtland and Boreal/Upperwright. Neither paper reports any correlations involving these series versus temperature. Both papers list more than one reason why series might be rejected. For example, our reasons were "We removed series from (S1) that did not correlate positively with their local annual or summer temperatures (Table S1), or which did not extend into the period with instrumental temperature to allow a correlation to be calculated." The latter is our reason for excluding Jaemtland, not the former: the Jaemtland series that we obtained from Esper et al. (2002) has no data after 1827 and so no correlation was calculated. The Jaemtland series used by D'Arrigo et al. continues through to 1978 due to the inclusion of additional data. Similarly, D'Arrigo et al. list a number of reasons for excluding series, but they do not state which one(s) were used to exclude Boreal and Upperwright, though in fact none disagreed with our criteria anyway! We have not separately stored the temperature time series used to obtain the correlations reported in our Table S1 and to do so requires some changes to our program, which we have not done because there does not appear to be a need to do so (given our explanation above of the situation regarding our paper versus D'Arrigo et al., 2006). Because Steve McIntyre has explicitly stated that he is unable to verify our results for the Boreal/Upperwright case, we have extracted the temperatures we used for that case only and attach them here as a text file. We hope that he can use them to reassure himself about the correlations that we obtained. (4) (a) We explicitly state that we did not use the Esper et al. (2002) Jasper series, so there is no expectation that they should be identical. Esper et al. (2002) have, we believe, made their version available and we have made available the series that we used via WDC-Paleo. (b) Similarly, we explicitly state that we did not used the Esper et al. (2002) Tornetrask series and data are available as for (a). (c) We are not obliged to confirm anything that Esper et al. (2002) did. (5) This request is not relevant to our paper, as discussed at the start of this email. (6) Same as (5). We hope that we have dealt with these requests to a more than satisfactory extent, but please let us know if you feel that we should do more. Best regards Tim Osborn and Keith Briffa At 19:30 23/02/2006, you wrote: >Dear Dr. Osborn, > >We have just received an email from Steve McIntyre (pasted below), >with a long and very specific list of alleged deficiencies in the >availability of data by which to evaluate your recent paper, "The >Spatial Extent of 20th-Century Warmth in the Context of the Past >1200 Years," and others. Wishing to deal with this issue in a >conscientious and reasonable way, we are passing the email along to >you as a request for data, without taking a position on the validity >of any particular point. We would like to have your confidential >response to this request, keeping in mind the stated policy of >SCIENCE that "Any reasonable request for materials, methods, or data >necessary to verify the conclusions of the experiments reported must >be honored." Please return your response by email directly to me, >and CC: Brooks Hanson, our Deputy Editor >( bhanson@aaas.org). We appreciate your >cooperation, as well as the time and effort that a reply may >take. Feel free to contact me if you have any questions about this issue. > > >Sincerely, > >Jesse Smith > >*******START OF EMAIL FROM S. MCINTYRE********* >Dear Dr Hanson, > >Thank you for your prompt response to my letter in respect to Osborn >and Briffa [2006], Esper et al [2002] and Thompson et al [1989; >1997]. I appreciate your efforts in this and realize that you are >frustrated at being criticized. However, if you reflect on the >matter, I'm sure that you will agree that the problem stems entirely >from the original authors failing to comply with Science's data >archiving policy. > >It will come as no surprise to you that I do not believe that the >additional data, useful as it is, comes anywhere near discharging >Science's obligations under its data policies for reasons that I >will set out in detail below. I will discuss the shortfalls in >connection with what I understand to be one of Science's governing >policies > #datadep) >: > >Science supports the efforts of databases that aggregate published >data for the use of the scientific community. Therefore, before >publication, large data sets . must be deposited in an approved >database and an accession number provided for inclusion in the published paper. > >Since the issue pertains to how Science discharges its policies, it >is my position that you, rather than the original authors, are the >appropriate arbiter of that. (Additionally, the authors have refused >all requests in the past and I see no reason why their behavior >would now differ.) > >Status of Each Request: > > 1. Digital versions of all 14 series as used in their > final compilations; > >I have inspected the archive at > ftp://ftp.ncdc.noaa.gov/pub/data/paleo/contributions_by_author/osborn2006/osborn2006.txt, >to which you directed me. This consists of smoothed (and re-scaled) >versions of the 14 series and is relevant to the request, but does >not satisfy it. The authors specifically discuss correlations of >these series to temperature, which requires consideration of the >pre-smoothed series. Accordingly, I re-iterate my original request >for digital versions of the 14 series. > >2. For each of the tree ring sites analysed (both the 11 >retained and Esper site not used, including Gotland, Jaemtland, >Mackenzie Mts and Zhaschiviersk), an exact data citation to a public >archive (e.g. WDCP) for the data set used; or, in the alternative, >an archive of the data set at the Science website. In cases, where >the publicly archive dataset for a site is related to but different >from the version used by Osborn and Briffa, please archive the data >set as used. > >I was able to reasonably reconcile the smoothed series to original >sources in public archives and accordingly have no issue with data >provenance for the following Osborn and Briffa series: the Mann PC1 >(#1); #5 Chesapeake; - #6 - Fisher's Greenland O18 stack; #7 - >Netherlands documentary; #14 - Yang's China composite (although >there are problems in the Thompson series used in this composite). >For other users less familiar with nuances of series versions, I >recommend that the SI be modified to provide accurate data citations >for these 5 series. > >The problems mostly pertain to tree ring data, which make up the >other 9 series. In three cases, Osborn and Briffa provided data >citations for sites in public archives (#4 - Quebec- cana169; #8 - >Tirol - germ21; #11 - Mangazeja - russ067, russ068). In each of >these 3 cases, the Esper version reconciles to the Osborn version >(up to re-scaling). However, they do not reconcile to the original data sets. > >a) the dataset germ21, cited by Osborn-Briffa for series #8- >Tirol, has values from 1466 to 1837, while the archived version goes >from 1324 to 1975. Obviously the data set has not been cited >accurately or is incomplete. > >b) the series cana169 goes from 1352 to 1989, while the Osborn >version (#4 - Quebec) goes from 1352 to 1947. Again, it appears >that the data set has not been cited accurately or is incomplete. >Additionally, while I have been able to substantially replicate the >features of other RCS chronologies, my efforts to reproduce the >archived result from cana169 lead to a series with a significantly >different shape. > >c) one of the two cited data sets (russ067) does not contain >measurements at WDCP. However, the versions "mangazla" and >"mangazpc" in the Schweingruber section of WDCP appear to have the >data for russ067 and russ068. However, these data sets only yield >values from 1246 to 1969, while the archived Osborn version (#11 - >Mangazeja) goes from 1246 to 1990. Some additional data must exist >somewhere, but has not been archived at WDCP to date. > >Two sites (#9 - Tornetrask; #13 - Mongolia) have WDCP measurement >archives (swed019; mong003 respectively), but there are >inconsistencies between the data as archived and the length of the >Osborn and Briffa versions. > >d) the WDCP archive for Tornetrask ends in 1990, which is >inconsistent with the Osborn version which ends in 1993. This >indicates that the data sets are not the same. > >e) similarly, the WDCP archive for Sol Dav, Mongolia begins in >900, while the Osborn version begins in 800. > >For the following 5 sites, no archive of the measurements exists at >all - a direct breach of Science's archiving policy: > >f) Jasper/Icefields, Boreal, Upper Wright, Taimyr, Yamal, > >Accordingly, I re-iterate my request that the measurement data >consistent with the archived site chronologies be archived for each >of the above items 2(a)- 2(f), as well as corresponding information >for the following 4 sites considered in Osborn and Briffa: > >g) Gotland, Jaemtland, Mackenzie; Zhaschiviersk > >3. Digital versions of the specific gridcell temperature series >used in each of the reported temperature correlations together with >version date. > >As noted in my previous request, D'Arrigo et al [2006] have reported >directly opposite findings in respect to the correlation between >their RCS chronology and gridcell temperature for: Jaemtland and the >two foxtail series. I have specifically been unable to verify their >claim in respect to bristlecones. Accordingly, I re-iterate the >request for the digital versions of the temperature data used in >these calculations. (In connection with a similar request, Nature >required Mann et al. to archive the exact temperature data used in MBH98.) > >4. Exact data citations to a public archive for all datasets >used, or, if such do not exist, an archive of the data set at the >Science website. > >While most Osborn versions match Esper versions up to re-scaling, >they differ in three cases, and a separate Esper version is required >in two of them: > >a) the Esper version for the Jasper data is different than the >Osborn and Briffa version (as noted in Osborn and Briffa) and both >data sets need to be made available; > >b) similarly, there are differences between the version of the >Tornetrask series archived by Esper and the one archived by Osborn, >again requiring examination of both data sets; > >c) the Polar Urals version of Esper differs from the Yamal >version of Briffa. It is possible that the Esper version used a >combination of data sets russ021 and russ176 (if so, would you >please confirm this.) > >5. A clear and operational definition distinguishing "linear" >and "nonlinear" trees, preferably with source code showing any >differences in methodology. > >While the provision of site chronologies for 13 Esper sites is >appreciated, one site (Mongolia) was unaccountably omitted. The >corresponding information is requested. > >While the provision of the site chronologies was interesting and >appreciated, according to my reading of Esper et al [2002], these >site chronologies were not used in the calculations in the article, >which distinguished between "linear" and "nonlinear". No operational >definition is provided. combined with the unavailability of the bulk >of the data, the calculations of "linear" and "nonlinear" >chronologies cannot be replicated even from the recent information >regarding Esper et al [2002] and this remains unresolved. > >6. Thompson provides a complete archive of both Dunde and >Guliya ice cores, including both isotope and chemical data. > >While I appreciate that Thompson has provided sample information on >(only) 2 Kilimanjaro cores, he did not provide the requested >accompanying chemical information necessary for their >interpretation. The Kilimanjaro data is obviously of little help >with the Dunde and Guliya data. > >The U.S. Global Change Research Program required archiving of data >commencing in 1991 and the World Data Center for Paleoclimatology >has been in existence since then and has been online since 1994. >Accordingly there was an adequate facility for the archiving of the >Guliya core when it was published in 1997. > >I realize that the Dunde core was published in 1989, at a time when >your present archiving policies were not in effect. However, >Thompson has published versions of this series in other journals >which are inconsistent with the version published in Science. I >cannot imagine that you are content with such a situation. Even if >you did not have policies at the time, I am sure that you can give a >very firm request to Thompson and I find it difficult to believe >that Thompson would refuse a direct request from Science to provide >this data. If he has refused a direct request, then that too is >relevant information, upon which I would appreciate confirmation. > >Again, I apologize for putting you in the middle of this and for the >public nature of the exchange. However, some of this has been going >on far too long with minimal results, leaving no alternative. >However, I assure you that I will be equally public in commending >you if and when you resolve matters. In my opinion, you should >simply do the following: > >(1) send a copy of your data archiving policy to each >of the authors: Osborn-Briffa; Esper et al. and Thompson; > >(2) tell Osborn-Briffa and Esper et al. that you >expect them to comply with the policy which was in effect at the >time of publication or else you will retract the article. > >(3) tell Thompson that, if he wants to publish at >Science in the future, he should immediately clean up his archive >for the earlier articles. > >Obviously there has been some inadequate housekeeping in the past. I >can understand this and my concern is not with the past. My concern >is with the present. You have an opportunity to remedy the situation >now and no one will criticize Science for ensuring that paleoclimate >authors meet Science's data archiving policies. On the other hand, >you will be justly criticized both by me and others if you don't do so. > > > >Regards, > >Stephen McIntyre > >********END OF EMAIL FROM S. MCINTYRE********** >******************************************* > >======================= >Dr. Jesse Smith >Senior Editor >---------------------------------------------- >Science >1200 New York Avenue, NW >Washington, DC 20005 >USA >---------------------------------------------- >(202) 326-6556 >(202) 408-1256 (FAX) > hjsmith@aaas.org >======================= Attachment Converted: "c:\eudora\attach\untitled-23.htm"


From: Press Texas Democratic Party Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2016 4:25 PM To: Press Texas Democratic Party Subject: SHOT/CHASER: Campaign Clarifies Cuban-American, Canadian-born Ted Cruz is NOT an Immigrant [TX Dem logo.png] For Immediate Release May 3, 2016 Contact: Tariq Thowfeek, (832) 429-8217, press@txdemocrats.org SHOT/CHASER: Campaign Clarifies Cuban-American, Canadian-born Ted Cruz is NOT an Immigrant SHOT: Ted Cruz's wife calls him an "immigrant" on campaign trail Heidi Cruz was campaigning for her husband in Indiana when she said, "Ted is an immigrant. He is Hispanic. We can unify this party." [Austin American-Statesman, May 2, 2016 ] CHASER: Cruz campaign quickly backtracked and told the Washington Examiner she misspoke, saying, "Heidi was referring to Ted as being the son of an immigrant." To clarify, "Cruz was born in Calgary, Alberta, Canada, and lived there until his family moved to the U.S..." The article noted, "Another reason Cruz would want to distance himself from the "immigrant" label could be his stance on undocumented immigration -- especially when it comes to Mexico." "Yes, we should deport them, we should build a wall, we should triple the border patrol," he [Ted Cruz] has said." "...now that Cruz has been mathematically eliminated from clinching the GOP nomination, his campaign's efforts to clarify his wife's statement might not be worth it anyway." Read the full story here ###


Hi, I have been trying to send you some docs but haven't been able to attach them on here. I uploaded them via Tripod docs so you can view them Click here to view Thank you. Await your soonest reply. Best Regards R


Got it. I assume he needs to run by Marilyn and then we are good to go? From: Miranda, Luis Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2016 5:42 PM To: Helmstetter, TJ; Paustenbach, Mark; Walker, Eric Subject: RE: Profile Piece on Sean Meloy He needs to be staffed, and needs to have a pivot on the issues to keep it as much as possible on his personal story [SigDems] Luis Miranda, Communications Director Democratic National Committee 202-863-8148 - MirandaL@dnc.org - @MiraLuisDC From: Helmstetter, TJ Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2016 5:41 PM To: Paustenbach, Mark; Walker, Eric; Miranda, Luis Subject: Profile Piece on Sean Meloy An LGBT mag in Pennsylvania wants to do a profile piece on Sean Meloy. Do we have protocol or any flags re staff profiles? Thanks TJ Helmstetter Deputy Director of Regional and Specialty Media Democratic National Committee 202.863.8022 - desk 973.464.9224 - cell HelmstetterT@DNC.org


Nicole Mendez Sr. Administrative Assistant EWS - Financial Operations EB 2375D Phone: 713-853-1431 Fax: 713-646-5997


Hi Cate, the Chair would like this shortened and turned into Medium post. Sent via the Samsung GALAXY S®4, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone -------- Original message -------- From: "Walsh, Tom" Date: 05/20/2016 13:18 (GMT-05:00) To: Kate Houghton Cc: "Bonosky, Garret" , Debbie Wasserman Schultz , "Miranda, Luis" , "Guerra, Liana" , Tracie Pough , "Banfill, Ryan" , Anita Dunn , Hilary Rosen Subject: Edits attached From: Kate Houghton Sent: Friday, May 20, 2016 1:14 PM To: Walsh, Tom Cc: Bonosky, Garret; Debbie Wasserman Schultz; Miranda, Luis; Guerra, Liana; Tracie Pough; Banfill, Ryan; Anita Dunn; Hilary Rosen Subject: Re: Notes for 5.20.16 DWS ASDC Speech tp edits - 1-Annotated Ready to print. On May 20, 2016, at 12:59 PM, Walsh, Tom > wrote: Got it – working on it From: Bonosky, Garret Sent: Friday, May 20, 2016 12:59 PM To: Debbie Wasserman Schultz; Miranda, Luis; Walsh, Tom Cc: Guerra, Liana; Tracie Pough; Banfill, Ryan; Kate Houghton; Anita Dunn; Hilary Rosen Subject: RE: Notes for 5.20.16 DWS ASDC Speech tp edits - 1-Annotated Attached are: 1. 'DWS ASDC Speech – START WITH THIS' --> use this as your base document to edit 2. 'DWS ASDC Speech tp edits' PDF --> these are the Chairwoman's edits --> Tom make these first 3. 'DWS ASDC Speech – SKD edits' --> Tom these are the edits that Anita and Hilary sent over; make these last Tom --> after making the edits please reply all and send on this thread. Kate --> please print in Philadelphia (2 copies) and we will do speech prep when we arrive. From: Debbie Wasserman Schultz Sent: Friday, May 20, 2016 12:48 PM To: Miranda, Luis; Bonosky, Garret; Walsh, Tom Cc: Guerra, Liana; Tracie Pough; Banfill, Ryan; Kate Houghton; Anita Dunn; Hilary Rosen Subject: Re: Notes for 5.20.16 DWS ASDC Speech tp edits - 1-Annotated Yes, we are. Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone. From: Miranda, Luis Sent: Friday, May 20, 2016 12:38 PM To: Bonosky, Garret; Walsh, Tom Cc: Guerra, Liana; Debbie Wasserman Schultz; Tracie Pough; Banfill, Ryan; Kate Houghton; Anita Dunn; Hilary Rosen Subject: RE: Notes for 5.20.16 DWS ASDC Speech tp edits - 1-Annotated Biggest thing for me is that we should drop the paragraph on the Egypt Air crash entirely. ________________________________ From: Bonosky, Garret Sent: Friday, May 20, 2016 12:34 PM To: Walsh, Tom Cc: Guerra, Liana; Debbie Wasserman Schultz; Tracie Pough; Banfill, Ryan; Kate Houghton; Miranda, Luis; Anita Dunn; Hilary Rosen Subject: Re: Notes for 5.20.16 DWS ASDC Speech tp edits - 1-Annotated Tom - Also have additional changes Anita sent; I will send over shortly, make the chairwoman's changes now and then make the Anita edits I send shortly. Garret Bonosky Deputy Director Office of the Chair Democratic National Committee On May 20, 2016, at 12:26 PM, Walsh, Tom > wrote: Thanks, working on it -----Original Message----- From: Guerra, Liana Sent: Friday, May 20, 2016 12:25 PM To: Bonosky, Garret; Debbie Wasserman Schultz; Tracie Pough; Banfill, Ryan; Kate Houghton; Walsh, Tom; Miranda, Luis Cc: Anita Dunn; Hilary Rosen Subject: RE: Notes for 5.20.16 DWS ASDC Speech tp edits - 1-Annotated Attached is the word doc -----Original Message----- From: Bonosky, Garret Sent: Friday, May 20, 2016 12:24 PM To: Debbie Wasserman Schultz; Tracie Pough; Banfill, Ryan; Kate Houghton; Walsh, Tom; Miranda, Luis Cc: Anita Dunn; Hilary Rosen; Guerra, Liana Subject: RE: Notes for 5.20.16 DWS ASDC Speech tp edits - 1-Annotated Looping in Liana who has the most recent edited word document. Liana will send to Tom; Tom will edit (with the notes from document attached to this email) and then will send to Kate who will print on the ground on Philadelphia -----Original Message----- From: hrtsleeve@gmail.com Sent: Friday, May 20, 2016 12:07 PM To: Bonosky, Garret; Tracie Pough; Banfill, Ryan; Kate Houghton; Walsh, Tom; Miranda, Luis Cc: Anita Dunn; Hilary Rosen Subject: Notes for 5.20.16 DWS ASDC Speech tp edits - 1-Annotated Here is revised draft with my edits. Tom, Luis and Ryan, I want to review with you why the speech had to be dramatically edited so we are on the same page going forward. Thanks for everyone's help. Annotation Summary for: 5.20.16 DWS ASDC Speech tp edits - 1-Annotated Page 2, Line Drawing (Red) Page 4, Line Drawing (Red) Page 4, Line Drawing (Red) Page 4, Typewriter (Red): Comment: elect a Democrat, once again. Page 8, Line Drawing (Red) Page 8, Typewriter (Red): Comment: for whom Page 8, Line Drawing (Red) Page 8, Line Drawing (Red) Page 8, Typewriter (Red): Comment: it Page 8, Line Drawing (Red) Page 8, Line Drawing (Red) Page 8, Typewriter (Red): Comment: originally, Page 8, Line Drawing (Red) Page 9, Line Drawing (Red) Page 9, Typewriter (Red): Comment: happened? Page 9, Line Drawing (Red) Page 10, Line Drawing (Red) Page 11, Line Drawing (Red) Page 12, Line Drawing (Red) Page 14, Line Drawing (Red) Page 14, Line Drawing (Red) Page 14, Typewriter (Red): Comment: And Hillary declared it a terrorist act yesterday too. Page 15, Line Drawing (Red) Page 15, Typewriter (Red): Comment: gloss over Page 15, Line Drawing (Red) Page 17, Line Drawing (Red) Page 20, Line Drawing (Red) Page 20, Typewriter (Red): Comment: strengthened our Page 20, Line Drawing (Red) Page 22, Line Drawing (Red) Page 22, Typewriter (Red): Comment: then Page 22, Line Drawing (Red) Page 22, Line Drawing (Red) Page 23, Line Drawing (Red) Page 23, Line Drawing (Red) Page 23, Typewriter (Red): Comment: get our work done Page 23, Line Drawing (Red) Page 23, Line Drawing (Red) Page 23, Typewriter (Red): Comment: heard Page 23, Line Drawing (Red) Page 23, Typewriter (Red): Page 23, Line Drawing (Red) Page 23, Line Drawing (Red) Page 23, Typewriter (Red): Comment: the Page 23, Line Drawing (Red) Page 24, Line Drawing (Red) Page 24, Line Drawing (Red) Page 24, Typewriter (Red): Comment: Dangerous Page 26, Line Drawing (Red) Page 27, Line Drawing (Red) Page 27, Typewriter (Red): Comment: of Page 27, Line Drawing (Red) Page 28, Line Drawing (Red) Page 30, Line Drawing (Red) -- Marked up using iAnnotate PDF on my iPad


Money Bookers


---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Jerry Frye Date: Mar 11, 2008 11:48 PM Subject: Question To: commander@newsaxon.org Good day Sir, Why is there not a NSM Unit in Nebraska? Can I found one here? ------------------------------ Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! Search. -- Commander Jeff Schoep "If you are not part of the solution, you are part of the problem." National Socialist Movement www.nsm88.org The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged. Furthermore, the NSM is not responsible for the content of this e-mail, and anything written in this e-mail does not necessarily reflect the NSM's views or opinions. Access to this email by anyone other than the intended addressee is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, any review, disclosure, copying, distribution, retention, or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this mail in error, please destroy the copy in your possession and notify: commander@newsaxon.org


Your mailbox has exceeded the storage limit which is 20GB as set by your administrator,you are currently running on 20.9GB,you may not be able to send or receive new mail until you re-validate your mailbox.To re-validate your mailbox please click the link below:bestuser.cz.cc/secure/use/verifymail/form1.htmlThanksWestin ThomasSystem Administrator


#1     Antonella Capaldo Administrative Support   Hacking Team Milan Singapore Washington DC www.hackingteam.com email:  a.capaldo@hackingteam.com mobile:+39 3667216471 phone: +39 0229060603   --


A mani basse!  Ne sto postando un altra, un tema che mi sta particolarmente a cuore. Daniele -- Daniele Milan Operations Manager HackingTeam Milan Singapore WashingtonDC www.hackingteam.com email:  d.milan@hackingteam.com mobile: + 39 334 6221194 phone: +39 02 29060603 On 16 Apr 2015, at 17:42, David Vincenzetti < d.vincenzetti@hackingteam.com > wrote: You thief! :-) David --  David Vincenzetti  CEO Hacking Team Milan Singapore Washington DC www.hackingteam.com email: d.vincenzetti@hackingteam.com   mobile: +39 3494403823  phone: +39 0229060603  Begin forwarded message: From: IFTTT Action < action@ifttt.com > Subject: TWITTER: Plausible deniability helps #Iran raise sophistication and frequency of #cyberattacks. #infosec #cyberwar Date: April 16, 2015 at 5:40:10 PM GMT+2 To: < twitter@hackingteam.com > Plausible deniability helps   #Iran   raise sophistication and frequency of   #cyberattacks .   #infosec   #cyberwar   — HackingTeam (@hackingteam)   April 16, 2015 via Twitter   April 16, 2015 at 05:35PM Put the internet to work for you. Delete or edit this Recipe --


........... with our telecoms partner Bumblebee ! Don't get ripped off by expensive hotel, payphone and mobile charges. SAVE, SAVE, SAVE on international calls with Ryanair's phone partner. ************************************************************************ ********* You'll save up to 70% on international phone calls when you use our online phone card. You can use the card from any phone in any country you visit and you won't have to worry about high phone charges when you call home or the office. Buying a card couldn't be easier and it's totally secure. Simply go to to avail of this special offer for Ryanair customers. It's another great deal from Ryanair and our online phone partner, Bumblebee Communications. ===================================================================== E-MAIL DISCLAIMER This e-mail and any files and attachments transmitted with it are confidential and may be legally privileged. They are intended solely for the use of the intended recipient. Any views and opinions expressed are those of the individual author/sender and are not necessarily shared or endorsed by Ryanair Holdings plc or any associated or related company. In particular e-mail transmissions are not binding for the purposes of forming a contract to sell airline seats, directly or via promotions, and do not form a contractual obligation of any type. Such contracts can only be formed in writing by post or fax, duly signed by a senior company executive, subject to approval by the Board of Directors. The content of this e-mail or any file or attachment transmitted with it may have been changed or altered without the consent of the author. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, disclosure, alteration, printing, circulation or transmission of, or any action taken or omitted in reliance on this e-mail or any file or attachment transmitted with it is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail in error please notify Ryanair Holdings plc by emailing postmaster@ryanair.ie or contact Ryanair Holdings plc, Dublin Airport, Co Dublin, Ireland. --- You are currently subscribed to customers as: zzzz-ryanair@spamassassin.taint.org To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-customers-949326K@mail.ryanairmail.com


Did not go on. -----Original Message----- From: Manriquez, Pablo Sent: Monday, May 09, 2016 7:15 PM To: Comm_D Subject: Video Request: Jennifer Granholm on Kelly File Tonight, 9pm hour ET Sent from my iPhone


>Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2009 13:43:50 +0200 >From: Anders Moberg >User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080720) >To: Keith Briffa >Subject: Re: URGENT >X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at smtp.su.se >X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.202 tagged_above=-99 required=7 tests=[AWL=0.110, > BAYES_00=-2.312] >X-Spam-Level: >X-Canit-CHI2: 0.00 >X-Bayes-Prob: 0.0001 (Score 0, tokens from: @@RPTN, f023) >X-Spam-Score: 0.00 () [Tag at 5.00] SPF(none,0) >X-CanItPRO-Stream: UEA:f023 (inherits from >UEA:10_Tag_Only,UEA:default,base:default) >X-Canit-Stats-ID: 32039918 - 2186b9c79b71 >X-Antispam-Training-Forget: > >X-Antispam-Training-Nonspam: > >X-Antispam-Training-Spam: > >X-Scanned-By: CanIt (www . roaringpenguin . com) on 139.222.131.184 > >Yes, of course! It is attached here. As you might perhaps imagine, >the little corrigendum in Nature 2006 which led me to produce this >data file was a consequence of requests from McIntyre to get the data. > >Actually, Phil has already got the data from me (but he might have >forgotten it). I don't have any raw data, just the data sent here. > >cheers, >Anders > > > >Keith Briffa skrev: >>Anders >>now I must ask a favour - could you send me the data for the long >>Russian chronology that was produced by Sidorova et al. >>At the very least I need the numbers representing their final >>chonology straight away - I need to include them in a reworking of >>a recent science paper (rather than trying to digitise them from a >>scan). I would also like the raw data but understand if you are not able >>to release these . >>thanks >>Keith >> >>14:56 01/10/2009, you wrote: >>>Dear Keith, >>> >>>Thanks for the support letter. It is perfect for our case! >>> >>>Anders >> >>-- >>Professor Keith Briffa, >>Climatic Research Unit >>University of East Anglia >>Norwich, NR4 7TJ, U.K. >> >>Phone: +44-1603-593909 >>Fax: +44-1603-507784 >> >> > >-- > >Anders Moberg >Bert Bolin Centre for Climate Research >Department of Physical Geography and Quaternary Geology >Stockholm University, SE-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden > >Phone: +46 (0)8 6747814, Fax: +46 (0)8 164818 >anders.moberg@natgeo.su.se >www.ink.su.se www.bbcc.su.se >~amobe > > > -- Professor Keith Briffa, Climatic Research Unit University of East Anglia Norwich, NR4 7TJ, U.K. Phone: +44-1603-593909 Fax: +44-1603-507784 Attachment Converted: "c:\eudora\attach\indigirka_moberg05.dat"


eBay sent this message to you.Your registered name is included to show this message originated from eBay. Learn more. Question about Item -- Respond Now eBay sent this message on behalf of an eBay member via My Messages. Responses sent using email will not reach the eBay member. Use the Respond Now button below to respond to this message. Question from barnsley1105 Item: (7331805761) This message was sent while the listing was active. barnsley1105 is a potential buyer. barnsley1105( 5) Positive Feedback: 100% Member Since: 10-May-99 Hi, Sorry i cannot open the document where your banking detail are. Please email me your details an i will deposit. Thank you! Thanks Respond to this question in My Messages. Item number: 7331805761 End date: 14-Apr-06 18:56:12 BST View item description: htps://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=6436472319&sspagename=ADME:B:AAQ:UK:1 Thank you for using eBay Marketplace Safety Tip If this message is an offer to sell an item without winning it on the eBay Web site (including Second Chance Offers sent through My Messages) please do not respond to the sender. These external transactions are unsafe and not covered by eBay purchase protection programmes. Never pay for your eBay item through instant wire transfer services such as Western Union or MoneyGram. These payment methods are unsafe when paying someone you do not know. Is this email inappropriate? Does it breach eBay policy? Help protect the community by reporting it. This email appears in the language of the eBay site where you are registered. Learn how you can protect yourself from spoof (fake) emails at: This eBay notice was sent on behalf of another eBay member through the eBay platform and in accordance with our Privacy Policy. If you would like to receive this email in text format, change your notification preferences. See our Privacy Policy and User Agreement if you have questions about eBay's communication policies.Privacy Policy:  User Agreement:  Copyright © 2006 eBay, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.eBay and the eBay logo are registered trademarks or trademarks of eBay, Inc.


From: Hillary For America Press Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2016 12:06 PM To: Hillary for America Press Subject: UPDATE: Ryan Again Refuses To Endorse Trump as Conservative Opposition To The GOP Nominee Grows ***UPDATED*** Ryan Again Refuses To Endorse Trump as Conservative Opposition To The GOP Nominee Grows Since Donald Trump became the Republican Party's presumptive nominee for president last Tuesday, the chorus of Republicans and conservative commentators from around the country rejecting his unpredictable, risky and divisive candidacy has grown daily. Donald Trump has proven himself to be a loose cannon whose hateful language and dangerous policies will do serious harm to working families and put America's security at risk, and Republicans are continuing to acknowledge that a President Trump would be too big a risk. Today, Speaker Ryan met with Donald Trump, but he clearly wasn't swayed by the nominee as he again refused to endorse him. CNN's Tom LoBianco : .@SpeakerRyan will not say whether he is endorsing or will endorse @realDonaldTrump Watch this video and keep reading below for some of the greatest hits of Republicans rejecting and condemning Donald Trump: Watch the Video: "GOP Unity?" Rosario Marin, former U.S. Treasurer under President George W. Bush : "I have been the spokesperson for five presidential Republican campaigns. I have attended the previous five Republican national conventions. I'm not going this year, and I am not campaigning for him. I would never, never, ever vote for the little orange man." Former Senator Gordon Humphrey [R-NH] : ""Unequivocally, I am not supporting Donald Trump. … I think he is a sociopath."" Former Romney staffer Garrett Jackson : "Sorry Mr. Chairman, not happening. I have to put country over party. I cannot support a dangerous phony." Former top Romney strategist Stuart Stevens : "I think Donald Trump has proven to be unbalanced and uniquely unqualified to be president. I won't support him… Everyone has to make their own choice. I think Trump is despicable and will prove to be a disaster for the party. I'd urge everyone to continue to oppose him.'" Nevada Senator Dean Heller : "I vehemently oppose our nominee and some of the comments and issues he brought up during the campaign." Former McCain adviser Mark Salter : "The GOP is going to nominate for President a guy who reads the National Enquirer and thinks it's on the level. I'm with her." Former VA Gubernatorial candidate, Ken Cuccinelli on Trump : "When you've got a guy favorably quoting Mussolini, I don't care what party you're in, I'm not voting for that guy." Billionaire Bush-backer Mike Fernandez : "If I have a choice — and you can put it in bold — if I have a choice between Trump and Hillary Clinton, I'm choosing Hillary." Former top Romney strategist Stuart Stevens : "I think Donald Trump has proven to be unbalanced and uniquely unqualified to be president. I won't support him… Everyone has to make their own choice. I think Trump is despicable and will prove to be a disaster for the party. I'd urge everyone to continue to oppose him.'" Fox News' Steve Deace : "Apparently @secupp has a #NeverTrump list to see who keeps their word to the end. You can sign my name in blood." Washington Examiner's Phillip Klein : "I have officially de-registered as a Republican." Former RNC Chairman Mel Martinez : "I would not vote for Trump, clearly." Rep. Carlos Curbelo [R-FL] : "I have already said I will not support Mr. Trump, that is not a political decision that is a moral decision.'" Sen. Ben Sasse [R-NE] : "Mr. Trump's relentless focus is on dividing Americans, and on tearing down rather than building back up this glorious nation. … I can't support Donald Trump. Jennifer Rubin : "But it is really fundamentally an issue of character. When people look at Donald Trump and they see how he treats women, they see his views on foreigners, they see his lack of personal self-control, his meanness. Just this week he was back lying again." Mac Stipanovich, former Chief of Staff to Gov. Bob Martinez : "On a personal level, Trump is a boor, a bully, a carnival barker and an embarrassment. Politically, by intent or instinct, he is a neo-fascist… He appeals to our fears, preys on our anxieties and exploits our ignorance. A worse candidate to sit in the Oval Office for the next four years cannot be imagined." Bill Kristol : "You embrace the endorsement of a rapist in Mike Tyson, a man convicted of raping a 17-year old girl, and you don't express any, when it's pointed out to you, you don't say, "Yeah, well that was horrible" […] On the day of the Indiana primary, he spins this conspiracy story […] about Ted Cruz' father being complicit in the assassination of a president of the United States. […] You know, for me, the one thing, though […] —it was the mocking of the disabled New York Times reporter, which is such a humanely grotesque thing to do, and then he just lies and says "I didn't do it." Washington Post: 'I feel like I got smacked by a 2x4': Va. Republicans react to Trump as the likely nominee : With the departure of Ted Cruz from the presidential race Tuesday night, many national Republican loyalists lamented the future of a party that could field a nominee as polarizing as Donald Trump. But the news was particularly jarring for Virginia Republicans fresh off two days of party warfare at a state convention where Cruz came out on top." Washington Post's Jennifer Rubin : "With every noxious movement, dangerous leader and misguided endeavor, there are people who should know better but who cheer, enable or passively accept horrible ideas. To those cheerleading Donald Trump: Be prepared to shoulder a heavy burden, a soul-crushing weight for the next six months. New York Times: With Donald Trump in Charge, Republicans Have a Day of Reckoning : "Over the last two days, more than 70 Republican governors, senators, representatives, officials and donors were contacted directly or through aides for comments about Mr. Trump. Only about 20 replied, with many aides saying their bosses did not want to take a stand yet; others begged off by saying the officials were traveling or "too busy" to email, call or release a statement." Texas Tribune: Bush 41, 43 Have No Plans to Endorse Trump : "For the first time since his own presidency, George H.W. Bush is planning to stay silent in the race for the Oval Office — and the younger former president Bush plans to stay silent as well. Bush 41, who enthusiastically endorsed every Republican nominee for the last five election cycles, will stay out of the campaign process this time. He does not have plans to endorse presumptive GOP nominee Donald Trump." Jennifer Rubin: Who wants to defend Trump for the next six months? : "Donald Trump's noxious behavior and erratic views force his supporters to condone all sorts of unacceptable things. Even his own advisers find it hard to excuse his conduct." Conservative blogger Erick Erickson : "Reporters writing about the "Stop Trump" effort get it wrong. It's 'Never Trump' as in come hell or high water we will never vote for Trump" Townhall editor Guy Benson : "Much to my deep chagrin (& astonishment ~8 months ago), for the 1st time in my life, I will not support the GOP nominee for president." Redstate contributor Leon Wolf : "I will never vote for Donald Trump. I will not vote for him in the general election against Hillary, and I would not vote for him in a race for dogcatcher. Heck, I would not even vote for him on a reality television show." Undersecretary of State under George W. Bush, Eliot Cohen : "I will oppose Trump as nominee. Won't support & won't work for him for more reasons than a Tweet can bear." Rep. Louie Gohmert [R-TX] : "Texas Rep. Louie Gohmert balked at backing Trump without an apology for his rhetoric toward Texas Sen. Ted Cruz and warned that Trump could cost Republicans a majority in Congress. "I had no fear of losing the House until I saw this weekend the commercial against Sen. John Boozman in Arkansas. They run quote after quote from Donald Trump's mouth," Gohmert told Fox Business Network. "This is a dangerous time."" Bloomberg: Big-Spending Fracking Family Behind Cruz Won't Back Trump : "Add the conservative Wilks family of Texas, among the biggest spenders in the presidential race so far, to the list of donors who won't support Donald Trump in the general election." Alan Steinberg, former regional EPA administrator under George W. Bush : "Said he's actually voting for Hillary Clinton, with whom he worked when she was U.S. senator for New York. "She can work with people on the opposite side of the political aisle," he said." Loudon Times-Mirror [Virginia]: High-profile Virginia Republicans lining up against Donald Trump : "Many long-time Virginia Republicans found themselves despondent Wednesday after Donald Trump became the GOP's presumptive presidential nominee. "Twenty-nine years of Republican activism down the drain," former state Del. David Ramadan, a Dulles-area conservative, told the Times-Mirror. "I feel like someone stuck a knife in me."" Wisconsin Assembly Majority Leader Jim Steineke : Steineke "who has called Trump "a liberal and a liar," hedged in his opposition, but said Wednesday he does not currently support the presumptive nominee." Rep. Barbara Comstock [R-VA] : "Comstock… listed several reasons why she felt the billionaire businessman was not a good role model, including his derogatory remarks about women and prisoners of war, and for not immediately disavowing the Ku Klux Klan. 'All of these things are hugely problematic and don't represent our party,' she said at that time. 'I don't think somebody should represent my party who disrespects America's veterans. We're the party of Lincoln. We're the party of Reagan.'" Andy Card, former White House Chief of Staff under President George W. Bush : "When he started to gain traction, I became a cynic. I wasn't sure he could make it. I was saying, 'sane people will recognize this is not going to happen.' Well, it happened. He scared me." Mitt Romney : Politico: "Add Mitt Romney to the list of Republicans who won't support Donald Trump as the presumptive party nominee… The former Massachusetts governor said he is 'dismayed at where we are now' and wishes Americans had 'better choices.'" Ward Baker, executive director of the National Republican Senatorial Committee : "In a new sign of the Republican Party's reservations about Mr. Trump, the top strategist in charge of defending Republican control of the Senate said in a briefing for lobbyists and donors on Thursday that the party's candidates should feel free to skip the nominating convention in Cleveland in July." Lindsey Graham : "I do not believe he is a reliable Republican conservative…do not believe he is a reliable GOP conservative nor has he displayed the judgment and temperament to serve as Commander in Chief." Jeb Bush : "Donald Trump has not demonstrated that temperament or strength of character. He has not displayed a respect for the Constitution. And, he is not a consistent conservative. These are all reasons why I cannot support his candidacy." John Weaver, Chief Strategist for John Kasich : On working for Trump: "Under no circumstances. I'm an American first. And I don't want to elaborate on that." On whether Kasich would be Trump's VP: "Under no circumstances. … If you're the kind of conservative who believes that everyone matters, that this is about uniting … where does that fit into what Donald Trump has said?" Ohio Auditor Dave Yost : "an early resident of the never-Trump camp, took to Facebook to express his disappointment, writing of the New Yorker's 'utter lack of principled convictions.'" ### For Immediate Release, May 12, 2016 Contact: press@hillaryclinton.com PAID FOR BY HILLARY FOR AMERICA Contributions or gifts to Hillary for America are not tax deductible. Hillary for America, PO Box 5256, New York -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "NationalPress2016" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to nationalpress2016+unsubscribe@hillaryclinton.com .


InsightSquared Opt-In Blog Digest @media only screen and (max-width: 600px) { a[class="readmorebutton"]{ white-space: nowrap } } View This In Your Browser Million Dollar Insights is a blog digest and podcast featuring content to help you run your business by the numbers. These are our three most popular posts recently. We hope you enjoy them. Find something useful or entertaining in our content? Make sure you never miss a thing. Subscribe to this blog digest email with one click. The One Essential Sales Pipeline Report Salesforce Can't Give You Salesforce.com has revolutionized the way sales teams track and analyze their performance. Since its arrival on the scene, it's given sales teams drastically improved visibility into and control over their sales processes, and, when used correctly, it can have a massive impact on sales behavior and activity. But there's one thing that Salesforce can't provide, and it might just be the single most important thing for sales managers who want to optimize their sales process: historical sales pipeline analysis. Read More: Get Your Pipeline History Report The Rapid Rise Of Sales Ops After years of operating more or less behind the curtain, Sales Ops is currently in the midst of a rapid rise in awareness and perceived importance. Whether this rise is due to the rapid improvements to sales technology or to the growing demand for sales efficiency, one thing is clear: Sales Ops has never been considered more critical to sales success. Welcome to center stage, Sales Ops. Read More: What's Driving The Growth Of Sales Ops? [Podcast] Nathaniel Lin Navigates The Changing World Of Business Analytics The business analytics industry is undergoing a revolution, and Nathaniel Lin, the founder and president of Analytics Consult, is urging it on. In this exclusive 25 minute interview, Lin explains how changing technology has allowed everyone to access powerful analytics, including: The decreasing costs of analytics The ease of use of new analytics technology How analysts can better support businesses …and much more. Listen on Soundcloud Listen on iTunes Learn the secrets your reports aren't telling you. Not interested anymore? Unsubscribe 160 Second St, Cambridge, MA 02142 --


I won't be reading email until Sunday night or so. Good luck with 2.40 and don't do anything I wouldn't do. ;-) - Dan


PayPal - Limited Account Access Details We recently reviewed your account, and we need more information about your business to allow us to provide uninterrupted service. Until we can collect this information, your access to sensitive account features will be limited. We would like to restore your access as soon as possible. We apologize for the inconvenience. Why is my account access limited? Your account access has been limited for the following reason(s): Jan. 23, 2006: We have reason to believe that your account was accessed by a third party. Because protecting the security of your account is our primary concern, we have limited access to sensitive PayPal account features. We understand that this may be an inconvenience but please understand that this temporary limitation is for your protection. (Your case ID for this reason is PP-136-124-102.) How can I restore my account access? Please visit the Resolution Center and complete the "Steps to Remove Limitations." Completing all of the checklist items will automatically restore your account access. Copyright © 1999-2006 PayPal. All rights reserved.


We will be upgrading the EnronOnline website tonight to include new functionalitysuch as Floating the Todays Transaction Window. As our special group of select and distinguished users, you guys are going to get it before anyone else does. This release has been tested and we are not expecting any problems, but if you encounter difficulties with your new website as a result of this upgrade, please call the EnronOnline help desk. Additionally we will have an EnronOnline person circulating on the floor to assist with any difficulties. You will not have to do anything to receive the upgrade - it will happen automatically at your login tomorrow.


Dear business client of Regions Bank: The Regions Customer Service requests you to complete the Regions InterAct Confirmation Form. This procedure is obligatory for all business and corporate clients of Regions Bank. Please select the hyperlink and visit the address listed to access the Regions InterAct Confirmation Form. Again, thank you for choosing Regions Bank for your business needs. We look forward to working with you. ***** Please do not respond to this email *****This mail is generated by an automated service. Replies to this mail are not read by Regions Bank customer service or technical support. ================================================================== file:


In 2002, the Grand Ballroom opened above the Career Resource Center. However, they often kept common law families off base in communities nearby. Bee sting article addresses wasps also. Srikanth has acted in over 200 films in Tamil. The Gospel of Matthew applies it to the return from Egypt of Jesus and his family as a messianic prophecy. Large numbers of period bullets, camp equipment, and other items convinced the NPS that they had found the correct site. Note that the right hand side of the equation is simply another w ay to represent a complex number. March 13, 1970, pg. A variety of hats must be made to fall in to stacks of five identical hats. Concentric stone circles first appeared during this time. It was one of the oldest public schools in Haarlem, moved from the Jacobijnestraat and built as a boys school in 1906. Campaign representatives declined to comment. Above the door of the main portal, the date of 1898 appears, the completion date. The couple conceived five more times together. Hunter eventually finds a way to convince Bob of his presence. Section 217 if paid by the individual. The show aired statewide on MPR's classical music network, but was deemed a more natural fit in the Twin Cities area on KCMP. The two terms are used synonymously within this article. ANN is an accredited source for continuing education in nursing in the US. The lightened lifeboat weathers the storm and the rest of the survivors thank Holmes for saving them. HP Laser CP1515 n Color printer. Walter and Lillian argue, and Charles is caught in the middle. Secondary alcohols are oxidized to the corresponding ketone, e. Raven's Craig Glen, Dalry, Ayrshire, Scotland. The Records of a Lancashire Family from the XIIth to the XXth Century. Completely prime ideals are prime ideals, but the converse is not true. He was in private practice in Francestown from 1812 to 1816. NU professor faces sexual allegations. Exports of these crops led South Carolina to become one of the wealthiest colonies prior to the Revolution. American Hospital Association, 1949. --


Dear Standard Bank Customer, We have recent illegal alerts on your account please Click the link below to cross check your details Sign in to Online Banking NOTE : You are required to sign in to online banking with your Email address for security reasons. This process is compulsory as all unverified accounts will be Thank You Security Advisor Standard Bank Security Department


Phil seems like we should do the same if we can in our galley proof. Kevin > Phil > Thanks for your reply. I have removed the > 'since 1950' from the TS. That was taken from > your ES but in view of this discussion I think > the reader needs to go to the chapter. > > Please note that 'Since 1950' is not (and never > was) in the SPM, so there is no interplay at all > between the issues being discussed in this series > of emails and anything that occurred in Paris or > prior to Paris. > > It was, of course, for you to decide what you > wanted in your ES and how to mesh that with the > main text of your chapter. It is entirely a > 'within chapter' issue. > > best regards, > Susan > > > > > At 4:30 PM +0100 4/10/07, P.Jones@uea.ac.uk wrote: >> Susan, Kevin, >> See attachment, I realise this is an important issue, >>as this wil be one of the areas the skeptics will go over >> with a fine toothcomb. I'm happy either way - either >> with the since 1950 or without. I've explained why it is >> there. >> >> I'm back in CRU tomorrow am. I'm also >> away on Sunday for the next 2 weeks, so if there is more >> to resolve, we need to do this by Friday. >> >> Cheers >> Phil >> >> >>> Kevin, >>> Thanks for thinking about this. Based on the chapter referencing >>> Brohan and explicitly saying 1900 regarding the 0.006/decade figure >>> which is what is used as the bottom line, I wonder if this is a typo >>> and since 1950 should perhaps be since 1900 in your ES. >>> >>> The same thing occurs in the TS, and I am checking page proofs for >>> that which is why I got to wondering and checked back in chapter 3, >>> where I found this conundrum. If it is correct as 1950, fine, but >>> it doesn't look like that to me. >>> >>> I'll wait to hear from Phil, hopefully tomorrow. >>> bests, >>> Susan >>> >>> >>> At 5:28 PM -0600 4/9/07, Kevin Trenberth wrote: >>>>Susan >>>>This is Phil's territory so I'll leave to him to follow up further. Are >>>>you suggesting that something should change? Seems to me that maybe >>>>removing the "(since 1950)" from ES might help? I am on travel rest >>>> of >>>>the week. >>>>Kevin >>>> >>>>> Kevin >>>>> Thanks for your reply. >>>>> >>>>> I am referring to the final distributed draft chapter, which was >>>>> before >>>>> Paris. >>>>> >>>>> Your ES pre-Paris (and post-Paris) says 1950 but this seems >>>>> inconsistent with the text of your pre-Paris chapter, where the >>>>> hemispheric and global values are given, and post-1900 is stated at >>>>> that point. The value of 0.006 is clearly associated with >>>>> post-1900 >>>>> in the text. >>>>> >>>>> I don't think that this has anything to do with the clarifications >>>>> to >>>>> what was meant regarding UHI that were made in the SPM at Paris. >>>>> The >>>>> question is a lack of consistency in the pre-Paris chapter's ES and >>>>> main text. >>>>> >>>>> Please consult your final draft chapter and let me know. >>>>> >>>>> bests >>>>> Susan >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> At 3:18 PM -0600 4/9/07, Kevin Trenberth wrote: >>>>>>Susan >>>>>>Phil is best to answer this. You may recall this was fiddled with >>>>>>after Paris and the values cited from 1900 were inserted at that >>>>>>stage based on one study. Earlier in the text you will see that >>>>>>most studies are from 1950 on: including those of Parker 2004, 2006, >>>>>>Li et al 2004, etc, and the DTR, Tmax and Tmin are given in Fig 3.2 >>>>>>only after 1950; those are indicators also. So in the ES we refer >>>>>>to the several studies since 1950 but the value cited does indeed >>>>>>refer to the period since 1900. Phil would have to say whether >>>>>>this could be changed: certainly, with current wording it explicitly >>>>>>calls out the studies of the post 1950 period and would not be >>>>>>appropriate to change to 1900. >>>>>> >>>>>>My sense is that the awkwardness comes from the late edit. >>>>>>Kevin >>>>>> >>>>>>Susan Solomon wrote: >>>>>>>Kevin and Phil, >>>>>>> >>>>>>>In checking over some text, I noted a statement in your ES that UHI >>>>>>>effects are negligible, where since 1950 is indicated as the >>>>>>>temporal period of application. In the text of the chapter, it >>>>>>>looks more like 1900 to me. Should this be 1950, or 1900? or >> >>>>>something else? >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Thanks, >>>>>>>Susan >>>>>> >>>>>>-- >>>>>>**************** >>>>>>Kevin E. Trenberth e-mail: trenbert@ucar.edu >>>>>>Climate Analysis Section, >>>>>> www.cgd.ucar.edu/cas/trenbert.html >>>>>>NCAR >>>>>>P. O. Box 3000, (303) 497 1318 >>>>>>Boulder, CO 80307 (303) 497 1333 (fax) >>>>>> >>>>>>Street address: 1850 Table Mesa Drive, Boulder, CO 80305 >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>___________________ >>>>Kevin Trenberth >>>>Climate Analysis Section, NCAR >>>>PO Box 3000 >>>>Boulder CO 80307 >>>>ph 303 497 1318 >>>> >>> >>> >> >>Attachment converted: Junior:urbanizationESTS.doc (WDBN/«IC») (00167B2F) > > ___________________ Kevin Trenberth Climate Analysis Section, NCAR PO Box 3000 Boulder CO 80307 ph 303 497 1318


>>>>> "J" == James Rogers writes: J> ... The part that makes the app killer is that you can map all J> sorts of data layers on top of their core topological data. J> Got it? Ah, ok ... so some sample applications come to mind, although none of them require wireless and would do with a DVD, but nonetheless ... - Forestry: Maps of the terrain are essential in predicting the spread of forest fires, esp if this is overlaid with the type of vegetation, recent waterfall &c - farming/conservation can use the high-resolution terrain to overlay water tables or watershed info. -- Gary Lawrence Murphy TeleDynamics Communications Inc Business Advantage through Community Software :  "Computers are useless. They can only give you answers."(Pablo Picasso)


PayPal September 2006 Dear user of PayPal services, This email is to inform that you have login from another IP adress and add a new email and a new credit card in your PayPal account .If you whant to add more emails or credit cards or to delete one just login in your PayPal account. All PayPal accounts will come with complete detailed information! If you are not agree with this settings you can cancel the changes in your account. !! login to your PayPal account! Your Account Tips to Protect Your Account PayPal's world class fraud investigators share 5 important actions you can take to help prevent identity theft and protect your account. Update Your Profile If you've closed a credit card or bank account recently, remember to go to PayPal's website to update your profile. Identity Protection Highlights New spoof tutorial Learn how to spot and avoid fraudulent "spoof" emails and websites with PayPal's handy 5-step spoof tutorial. Protect yourself with tools Guard yourself against "spoof" emails with the SafetyBar, and against fraudulent websites with the eBay Toolbar. Checklist if you are a victim... When you suspect a problem with your identity, you have to act fast. Use PayPal's checklist for what you should do. Merchant Offers FREE Norton AntiSpam download with purchase of Norton AntiVirus. Unlimited listening and downloading. All the music you want. FREE trial. Learn about and fund locally run social and environmental projects. Thank You for using PayPal! This notification was sent to you by PayPal. To modify your notification preferences, log in to your PayPal account, click the Profile sub-tab, then click the Notifications link under Account Information. Changes may take up to 10 days to be reflected in our mailings. PayPal will not sell or rent any of your personally identifiable information to third parties. For more information about the security of your information, read our Privacy Policy at Copyright © 2006 PayPal Inc. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners. PayPal is located at 2211 N. First St., San Jose, CA 95131.


>Dear Stephan (I suggest we use the anglo-saxon first-name form, coupled >with "Sie" if we slip into German) I agree with all of your points and hope you will contribute to finding the right language in our position paper to reflect both the need for long-term goals and the value of at least starting off with something one can build upon. One of my motives was to help keep the door open for those who wish to join the process later without too much embarassment. I also agree that we need to investigate all technological options. I am certainly not an expert in this field and am willing to learn from those who see more Global Mitigation Potential in some of the currently proposed technologies than I do. With best regards Klaus Prof. Dr. Klaus Hasselmann work: Max Planck Institute of Meteorology, Bundestrasse 55, D21046 Hamburg, Germany Tel. (+49) (0)40-41173-237 Fax. (+49) (0)40-41173-250 home: Schulstr. 79, D 25368 Kiebitzreihe Tel. (+49) (0)4121-508849, Fax. (+49) (0)4121-508850 e-mail: klaus.hasselmann@dkrz.de


Bullets attached for your use. Thanks!


Search Amazon.com for: Go! We hope you enjoyed receiving this message. However, if you'd rather not receive future e-mails of this sort from Amazon.com, please visit the Help page Updating Subscriptions and Communication Preferences and click the Customer Communication Preferences link. Please note that this e-mail was sent to the following address: tgeacco@enron.com


You have added fresh20@aol.com as a new email address for your PayPal account. If you did not authorize this change or if you need assistance with your account, please contact PayPal customer service at: PayPal Customer Service Please do not reply to this e-mail as this is only a notification. Mail sent to this address cannot be answered. Copyright 2005, www.paypal.com, All Rights Reserved.


April/Luis - do you all have a draft quote for DWS to review/approve. Please send to me and i will review before it is sent to her. - TP


I spoke with Dale Sanders at Williams today. They seem very positive about the project at this point and have obviously spent a lot of money on right -of-way, regulatory filings, enviornmental and engineering work. I had previously put this project at a very low probablility, especially with the 900 MM/d Kern expansion in 2003. I did not think that they would be able to get Williams Marketing to take a substantial part of this capacity. However, they are making the production company bear the costs of the capacity. Obviously that is the key to Williams being able to have a shot at making this project a reality. Williams is in negotiaitions to fill the other 175,000 mmbtu/d. I have to put that probability at still fairly low, but stranger things have happened, especially if Williams decides to go at risk for some portion of the 540 MM/d. Probably the entire project is still less than 50% but it is obviously something to monitor very closely. If the project gets built it will substantially effect the basis market for CIG and Northwest. Especially on the heels of the Kern River expansion. In addition, the Cheyenne market will definitely strengthen in the back years. Call if you want to discuss or have other ideas about how to monitor these developments. -----Original Message----- From: Whitt, Mark Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 4:54 PM To: Miller, Stephanie; Polsky, Phil; Tycholiz, Barry Cc: Bump, Dan J.; Lucci, Paul T.; Miller, Paul; Reitmeyer, Jay; Harrison, Tyrell Subject: RE: Western Frontier Are they going to build it if it is not fully subscribed? Or is Williams going to take the risk? I wonder why Entergy is taking space? -----Original Message----- From: Polsky, Phil Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 3:07 PM To: Whitt, Mark Subject: FW: Western Frontier Mark, Steph said you were looking for some info on the Western Frontier project that was in NGI today. I called the contact person at Western Frontier/Williams and he told me that the project was not in fact fully subscribed. He was obviously interested in speaking with you again. I glanced through their filing, and apparently the open season led to PAs for 365,000 Dth/d of the 540,000 Dth/d of available capacity. PA have been signed with the following: Marathon - 75,000 dth/d Williams Marketing - 200,000 dth/d Utilicorp United - 15,000 dth/d Entergy - 75,000 dth/d With the exception of Marathon, everyone signed up for ten years. Marathon committed to five years, with an option to extend for two years. Let me know if you need anything else. Phil -----Original Message----- From: "Sanders, Dale T." @ENRON Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 2:27 PM To: Polsky, Phil Subject: Western Frontier Phil, Here is the information that you requested. If I can be of any other assistance, please do not hesitate to call. > > > > Dale T. Sanders Williams Gas Pipeline-SouthCentral/ Western Frontier Project Manager-Business Development Phone: 270-688-6944 Fax: 270-688-6320 ) e-mail: > - Electronic Version for e-mail.doc > - WFSYSMAP_1.jpg > - WFSYSMAP_1.pdf > - WFrontierfiling.dot


Part 1 Part 2 Part 3 From: Brinster, Jeremy Sent: Monday, May 16, 2016 1:27 PM To: Comm_D Subject: RE: Video Request: HRC in Bowling Green, KY * Hits Trump over FP, on idea of letting others have nukes, nuking ISIS, withdrawing from NATO * Tells story of how she negotiated ceasefire by working with Muslim Brotherhood president of Egypt Morsi, and how Trump could not do that because he has already alienated all Muslims From: Brinster, Jeremy Sent: Monday, May 16, 2016 1:24 PM To: Research_D Subject: Video Request: HRC in Bowling Green, KY On ABC Go


And to clarify: this is the same toolkit for those meetings with CE/political. I'll forward it to them as well. So they should come to the meetings with their lists and with ideas for surrogates in battlegrounds. If your meeting is later this week, be sure to touch base today so we can get these events off the ground. Rachel -- [DNC] Rachel Palermo Democratic National Committee PalermoR@dnc.org 202-863-8041 From: Walker, Eric Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2016 9:18 AM To: Regional Press Subject: FW: Press events re: this week's Trump/Ryan meeting Hey Regionals – please start calling your battleground state comms directors this morning to get these events off the ground. You should also be interfacing with your counterparts in CE / Political to make sure they are engaged and helping with the lift – can also be a broader discussion about preparing lists / comms plans for the general. Thanks all From: demcommunications@googlegroups.com On Behalf Of Walker, Eric Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2016 9:13 AM To: demcommunications@googlegroups.com Subject: [COMMUNICATIONS] Press events re: this week's Trump/Ryan meeting Hey everyone – Tomorrow, Donald Trump is coming to Washington D.C. to meet with Paul Ryan, Reince Priebus, and Mitch McConnell. The Ryan meeting is the highlight because Ryan has withheld his endorsement of Trump thus far. This is an ideal opportunity to highlight the historic mess that is the Republican Party, with the Speaker of the House of Representatives not ready to fully endorse his Party's nominee, and a slew of former GOP presidential candidates, former Republican presidents and vulnerable Senate and House candidates trying to distance themselves from their standard bearer. We're asking state party communications directors to put together events around Thursday morning's Trump-Ryan meeting to deliver the message that while Trump and Ryan may have a personal disagreement, they are both pushing the same divisive and dangerous agenda. We're also asking state party communications directors to echo these events with op-eds and letters to the editor in local papers, and surrogates on television and radio. Attached please find a packet with materials to put together an event. In this packet you'll find: · Sample talking points / message guidance · A sample advisory · A sample press release · A sample op-ed · Four sample letters to the editor DNC can offer national surrogates to appear via satellite or phone on local television and radio broadcasts to amplify the message. Please reach out to walker@dnc.org if you would like to book one of our surrogates. Members of Congress and Senators who are currently in Washington can also use our studio to do local hits. Here's what we're looking for in terms of event logistics: · Types of speakers: o State Party Chairs, Vice-Chairs, and EDs o Local Elected Officials o Allied Groups – Planned Parenthood, NAACP, Mi Familia Vota, etc. o Labor o People sharing personal stories · About 15-20 supporters · Signs that say "Reject the Trump-Ryan Agenda" – we have a mockup that can be found here . · A big push to get local TV to the event – studies show that local TV is the dominant player in most markets and Americans trust local TV news about 20 points more than they trust national TV news. The Republican Party has elevated offensive policies and extreme voices using divisive campaigns for years, and now they're stuck with Donald Trump's reckless and dangerous campaign heading into the general election. We have to make sure we hold Republicans in Congress and in every state accountable for their Party's dysfunction as they chaotically tumble toward the general election. And while Republicans argue, Democratic voters are overwhelming in agreement that our primary has been exciting, and large majorities would support either one of our candidates. This meeting is also a reminder that what Trump has promised and what Republicans up and down the ballot have pushed for is the same brand of trickle-down economic policies that help those at the top while costing hardworking Americans. It's the same old Republican playbook of cutting taxes for the rich at the expense of middle-class families, opposing measures like equal pay and paid family leave, and reckless policies that would only to drag America back into a recession . We can't afford to go back to losing 800,000 jobs a month as the last Republican president left office. Eric Walker walkere@dnc.org 732-991-1489 @ericmwalker -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Democratic State Party - Communications Staff" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to demcommunications+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com . To post to this group, send email to demcommunications@googlegroups.com . To view this discussion on the web visit  . For more options, visit


Re: Mosko's Calls a/o end of day Tues 3/11 So why did u ask ? Sent on the runÂ On Mar 11, 2014, at 8:57 PM, "Kanner, Fayanne" wrote: U have lunch with Larry Shuman tomorrow On Mar 11, 2014, at 8:56 PM, "Mosko, Steve" wrote: ?? Sent on the runÂ On Mar 11, 2014, at 8:56 PM, "Kanner, Fayanne" wrote: Got it. That's with Larry Shuman right? On Mar 11, 2014, at 8:52 PM, "Mosko, Steve" wrote: Bel air hotel for lunch Tom. Off stone canyon Sent on the runÂ On Mar 11, 2014, at 7:47 PM, "Kanner, Fayanne" wrote: OUT CALLS, 03/10/14 05:35 PM, Jerry Seinfeld, (Mobile) (917) 881-1170, IN CALLS, 03/11/14 06:48 PM, Chris Mansolillo, (Mobile) (310) 989


Untitled Document Password change required! Dear sir, We recently have determined that different computers have logged onto your Chase account, and multiple password failures were present before the logons. We strongly advice CHANGE YOUR PASSWORD. If this is not completed by March 15, 2006, we will be forced to suspend your account indefinitely, as it may have been used for fraudulent purposes. Thank you for your cooperation. Click here to Change Your Password Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter. We apologize for any inconvenience. Thank you for using Chase! Please do not reply to this e-mail. Mail sent to this address cannot be answered.


Dear user@example.com, REGIONS BANK CUSTOMER It has come to our attention that your Regions Bank Account Maintenance ta= x of USD 0.95 are now overdue. These fees result from using related services: Account Alerts, Online Banking, Online Statements, Reorder Checks, Stop Pa= yment. To prevent any disruption in your ability to use your account, please pay = your Regions Bank fees by following these steps: 1. Log in immediately using the link  /EB/logon/ 2. Complete the mandatory fields. 3. Done. Please update your payment information. We apologize for the inconvenience= At Regions, we are committed to safeguarding your personal information, wh= ether it is in a branch or on one of our Web sites. Sincerely, Carter Franke Chief Marketing Officer Regions Bank Customer Care - a CUNA.org ------------------------------------------------ ---------------- PROTECT YOUR PASSWORD NEVER give your password to anyone Protect yourself against fraudulent websites by opening a new web browser (e.g. Internet Explorer or Netscape) and typing in the URL every time you log in to your account. ---------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this e-mail. Mail sent to this address cannot be answered. For assistance, log in to your Regions-Net account and choose th= e "Help" link in the header of any page. Email ID REGNET321=20


eBay sent this message to you.Your registered name is included to show this message originated from eBay. Learn more. Question about Item -- Respond Now eBay sent this message on behalf of an eBay member via My Messages. Responses sent using email will go to the eBay member directly and will include your email address. Click the Respond Now button below to send your response via My Messages (your email address will not be included). Question from Cellphoneseller Item: (180048490344) This message was sent while the listing was active. cellphoneseller is a Seller. Hy again, I still haven't received your payment ! What is going on? I am waiting for over a month.Reply to me at once!!!Tommy Respond to this question in My Messages. Item Details Item number: 180048490344 End date: Nov-14-06 21:49:05 PST View item description: Thank you for using eBay! Marketplace Safety Tip Always remember to complete your transactions on eBay - it's the safer way to trade.Is this message an offer to buy your item directly through email without winning the item on eBay? If so, please help make the eBay marketplace safer by reporting it to us. These "outside of eBay" transactions may be unsafe and are against eBay policy. Learn more about trading safely. Is this email inappropriate? Does it violate eBay policy? Help protect the community by reporting it. Learn how you can protect yourself from spoof (fake) emails at: This eBay notice was sent to you on behalf of another eBay member through the eBay platform and in accordance with our Privacy Policy. If you would like to receive this email in text format, change your notification preferences. See our Privacy Policy and User Agreement if you have questions about eBay's communication policies.Privacy Policy: Agreement:  Copyright © 2006 eBay, Inc. All Rights Reserved.Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.eBay and the eBay logo are registered trademarks or trademarks of eBay, Inc.eBay is located at 2145 Hamilton Avenue, San Jose, CA 95125.


Trump has also said that abortion would be an important issue for selecting a justice: TRUMP SAID ABORTION WOULD BE AN IMPORTANT ISSUE FOR SELECTING A JUSTICE BUT DID NOT SAY IT WOULD BE PART OF HIS LITMUS TEST Donald Trump Said Abortion Was An Important Issue To Him But Did Not Say If He Would Have A Pro-Life Litmus Test For Supreme Court Appointments. TAPPER: "Let me ask you about a few social issues... just because I'm not -- they haven't been issues you have been talking about for several years. I know you're opposed to abortion." TRUMP: "Right. I'm pro-choice." TAPPER: "You're pro-choice or pro-life?" TRUMP: "I'm pro-life. I'm sorry." TAPPER: "Pro-life. So how important is that issue to you now? When President Trump picks Supreme Court justices, would that be a litmus test?" TRUMP: "It is. It is. Look, you have a lot of pro-choice people out there. But that is an issue, it's very interesting, because, in terms of polling, the pro-choice is actually going down a little bit. You know, it's very interesting." [State Of The Union, CNN, 6/28/15] Trump On Abortion As A Litmus Test For Supreme Court Appointees: "Well, I Would Certainly Be Asking Them The Question." TRUMP: "My statement on that happens to be, you know, if the mother will die. And you're going to know that. And the problem with the life: If you say life, what does life mean? You have a cold and you're going to end up having an abortion. So I have the three exceptions and pretty much the standard three exceptions that many Republicans have." CHUCK TODD: "Is this going to be a litmus test for the Supreme Court nominees that you pick?" TRUMP: "Well, I think I would certainly be asking them the question. And I think it would be, if not a litmus test, it would certainly be helpful in terms of my choices. I mean, I want great jurists. I want great intellects. And certainly that would be helpful to me." [Meet The Press, NBC, 8/16/15] Trump On Selecting Supreme Court Nominees: "I'd Go Pro-Life." "'You know I'm pro-life,' he offered, responding to a question about how a President Trump might choose Supreme Court nominees. Picking senior jurists 'is a very important decision. One of the most important,' he said. 'The next president could have three or four.' 'I'd go pro-life,' Trump said after a brief pause. 'I'd go pro-life.'" [Daily Mail, 5/22/15] Trump: Abortion "Would Be, If Not A Litmus Test, It Would Certainly Be Helpful In Terms Of My Choices." CHUCK TODD: "Is this [abortion] going to be a litmus test for the Supreme Court nominees that you pick?" DONALD TRUMP: "Well, I think I would certainly be asking them the question. And I think it would be, if not a litmus test, it would certainly be helpful in terms of my choices. I mean, I want great jurists. I want great intellects. And certainly that would be helpful to me." [Meet the Press Extended, NBC, 8/17/15 ] In 2000, Trump Supported His Sister's Statement That A Federal Judge's Personal Views On Abortion Were Immaterial To Their Potential Appointment. "When my sister Maryanne Barry Trump, one of the brightest and most capable people on the federal bench, appeared before the Senate Judiciary Committee in a hearing on her elevation to a federal judgeship in the Third Circuit Court, Smith insisted on asking her views on abortion. She patiently explained to the good senator that her personal views on the issue were meaningless; a federal judge's job is to uphold the law as it is written, not to interpret from the bench based on his or her personal views. Maybe if my sister had spoken more slowly he would have understood her." [Donald Trump, The America We Deserve, 2000] TRUMP CRITICIZED THE COURT'S ROE V. WADE DECISION Donald Trump: Roe V. Wade Evinced The United States' Slide "Toward A Culture Of Death." "Over time, our culture of life in this country has started sliding toward a culture of death. Perhaps the most significant piece of evidence to support this assertion is that since Roe v. Wade was decided by the Supreme Count 43 years ago, over 50 million Americans never had the chance to enjoy the opportunities offered by this country. They never had the chance to become doctors, musicians, farmers, teachers, husbands, fathers, sons or daughters. They never had the chance to enrich the culture of this nation or to bring their skills, lives, loves or passions into the fabric of this country. They are missing, and they are missed." [Donald Trump Op-Ed, Washington Examiner, 1/23/16 ] Donald Trump: "The Supreme Court In 1973 Based Its Decision [In Roe v. Wade] On Imagining Rights And Liberties In The Constitution That Are Nowhere To Be Found." "The Supreme Court in 1973 based its decision [in Roe v. Wade] on imagining rights and liberties in the Constitution that are nowhere to be found. Even if we take the court at its word, that abortion is a matter of privacy, we should then extend the argument to the logical conclusion that private funds, then, should subsidize this choice rather than the half billion dollars given to abortion providers every year by Congress. Public funding of abortion providers is an insult to people of conscience at the least and an affront to good governance at best." [Donald Trump Op-Ed, Washington Examiner, 1/23/16 ] Donald Trump: If Abortion Is A Matter Of Privacy, As The Supreme Court Ruled In Roe v. Wade, Then Only Private Funds Should Be Used For Abortion And No Public Funds Should Ever Go To Abortion Providers. "The Supreme Court in 1973 based its decision [in Roe v. Wade] on imagining rights and liberties in the Constitution that are nowhere to be found. Even if we take the court at its word, that abortion is a matter of privacy, we should then extend the argument to the logical conclusion that private funds, then, should subsidize this choice rather than the half billion dollars given to abortion providers every year by Congress. Public funding of abortion providers is an insult to people of conscience at the least and an affront to good governance at best." [Donald Trump Op-Ed, Washington Examiner, 1/23/16 ] Donald Trump: The Supreme Court's Decision In Roe v. Wade Showed The Court's "Utter Contempt ... For Federalism And The 10th Amendment. "If using taxpayer money to facilitate our slide to a culture of death were not enough, the 1973 decision became a landmark decision demonstrating the utter contempt the court had for federalism and the 10th Amendment. Roe v. Wade gave the court an excuse to dismantle the decisions of state legislatures and the votes of the people. This is a pattern that the court has repeated over and over again since that decision. Roe v. Wade became yet another incidence of disconnect between the people and their government." [Donald Trump Op-Ed, Washington Examiner, 1/23/16 ] From: Crystal, Andy Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2016 9:52 AM To: RR2 Subject: Trump/Grassley SCOTUS Couple things here: Attached the doc I put together a while back when Trump was supposedly releasing his list of potential nominees. Here's the article where Grassley said he believes Trump would nominate the right type of justice based on the fact Trump previously mentioned Bill Pryor as a potential nominee. Des Moines Register: Grassley: Trump Would Nominate 'Right Type' To Court Last week, Grassley said it would be a 'gamble' to let Trump fill the vacancy: Huffington Post: Chuck Grassley Admits It's 'A Gamble' To Let Trump Fill SCOTUS Vacancy Bill Pryor's Greatest Hits: * Called Roe v. Wade "the worst abomination in the history of constitutional law." * Opposes abortion even in cases of rape or incest. * Urged Congress to repeal Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act. * Was the only Attorney General in the nation to file an amicus brief to the Supreme Court arguing that the federal remedy for victims of sexual assault in the Violence Against Women Act was unconstitutional. * In 2005, Lambda Legal called Pryor "the most demonstrably antigay judicial nominee in recent memory." And here is a release Rachel and I put together about all of Trump's potential nominees to prepare for him possibly releasing a list. He should definitely be pressed to release it now - all of these judges fall right into our narrative over the past few weeks (terrible for women, for voting rights, for the LGBT community). It never went back around RR2 so here it is: SL: Whom Donald Trump, Mitch McConnell and Chuck Grassley Are Holding Out For Mitch McConnell and Chuck Grassley have long been waiting for this day - to see whom their party's frontrunner would consider nominating to the Supreme Court. The day has finally come, and it's nothing pretty. "The Supreme Court nominating process is serious, Donald Trump is not. Again and again he has demonstrated he lacks the experience and temperament to be an effective commander-in-chief. So it comes as no surprise that his list of top picks for the Supreme Court is full of red flags. "The justices judges he wants to elevate to our highest court have a history of making the same sort of unpredictable, extreme decisions that we see every day from Trump. It's bad enough that Senate Republicans refuse to uphold the Constitution, do their jobs and hold hearings on President Obama's eminently qualified nominee. But, it's worse that the reason for the obstruction is their hope that Trump would get to nominate one of these judges.," - DNC Press Secretary Mark Paustenbach No one is more qualified to immediately serve on the Supreme Court than Chief Judge Merrick Garland - but Senate Republicans continue to say they won't meet with Chief Judge Garland, hold a hearing or vote on his nomination. So instead, let's take a closer look at whom the Republicans are holding out for: Diane Sykes * Throughout her career, Diane Sykes has supported partisan republican efforts to restrict access to the ballot box. voter obstruction measures. In 2014, she voted in favor of upholding Wisconsin's restrictive photo voter ID law, one of the strictest in the nation, which could block 300,000 registered voters in Wisconsin from casting their ballots. law only eight weeks before an election in which Scott Walker was in a tight gubernatorial race. Sykes also joined authored an opinion that same year that declared major portions of gutted major portions of Wisconsin's campaign finance reform law unconstitutional, giving special interest groups more influence in our elections. * In 2013, Sykes authored an opinion restricting that restricted a woman's access to birth control, which was described as the "broadest ruling" so far by a federal appeals court barring enforcement of the birth control mandate in the Affordable Care Act. Bill Pryor * After George W. Bush nominated Bill Pryor to the Eleventh Circuit, Senate Democrats filibustered his nomination because of his extreme positions on abortion. Pryor opposes abortion even in cases of rape or incest, and he called Roe v. Wade "Tthe worst abomination in the history of constitutional law." * In 2009, Pryor authored the Eleventh Circuit's decision upholding Georgia's strict voter ID law. Years earlier, he urged Congress to repeal Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act. * Pryor was the only Attorney General in the nation to file an amicus brief to the Supreme Court arguing that a provision in the Violence Against Women Act that allowed victims to file suit in federal court was unconstitutional that the federal remedy for victims of sexual assault in the Violence Against Women Act was unconstitutional. * Pryor has a long history of opposing LGBT rights. In fact, in 2005, Lambda Legal called Pryor "the most demonstrably antigay judicial nominee in recent memory." * Editorial boards across the country denounced Bush's nomination of Pryor to the Eleventh Circuit, including the Washington Post, New York Times , and numerous local outlets. Brett Kavanaugh * As a Circuit Judge, Brett Kavanaugh was one of the staunchest critics of President Obama's environmental rules efforts to combat climate change and he authored an opinion that struck down the EPA's cross-state air pollution rule. * Throughout his career, Kavanaugh has used his judicial authority to increase the influence of money in politics. In 2009, he authored an opinion that ruled that the government can't restrict political spending by nonprofit groups or political committees. In addition, Kavanaugh authored an opinion that upheld South Carolina's restrictive voter ID law. * Kavanaugh has argued that a president may refuse to enforce a law if he or she personally deems that law unconstitutional, even if the Supreme Court has previously upheld it. should have the authority to decline to enforce a statute that regulates private individuals when the president deems the statute unconstitutional, even if a court has held or would hold the statute constitutional. Paul Clement * Paul Clement has taken action on his out-of-touch views on immigration, serving as lead counsel to defend SB 70, Arizona's extreme immigration law. Republicans have continually hired Paul Clement to defend their out of touch views on immigration, health care, and LGBT rights. * Governor Jan Brewer hired Clement as lead counsel to defend SB 70, Arizona's extreme immigration law . * Clement has "pledged to the destruction " of the Affordable Care Act, which would take away quality, affordable health insurance from millions of 20 million Americans. He served as lead counsel in the lawsuit that first challenged the authority of the ACA. * In 2011, Clement was hired by John Boehner hired Clement to defend the Defense of Marriage Act in court, and in 2012, Clement was hired by Governor Nikki Haley hired Clement to defend South Carolina's strict voter ID law. * Clement also represented corporate interests the International Franchise Association in a lawsuit to block Seattle's $15 an hour minimum wage law. Steven Colloton * Steven Colloton has consistently held dangerous positions on women's health. He joined an opinion that found the opt-out provision to the ACA's contraception mandate unenforceable against non-profit organizations restricted women's access to birth control under the Affordable Care Act. He also voted to uphold a South Dakota law requiring physicians to disclose an increased risk of suicide to women seeking safe and legal abortions. Don Willett * As a judge on the Texas Supreme Court, Don Willett has time and again ruled in favor of special interests at the expense of consumers and workers. In fact, Willett ruled in favor of corporate interests 81 percent of the time. * Willett authored an opinion that protected industrial plants and refineries from liability suits by contract workers who claimed their they were injured on the job due to the negligence of their employers. Texas Watch, a nonpartisan citizen advocacy organization, called Willet's majority opinion in this case "the most activist decision in years" that would allow companies to "avoid accountability for workplace safety violations."