Hi. You are so wonderful. Can it get any better?!!! Every minute with you no matter what we are doing is perfect. I love you so much and can't wait for us to be together always. You have a great sense of humor and you understand mine (that's a plus!). Take care babe. Steve


Let's blast. [SigDems] Luis Miranda, Communications Director Democratic National Committee 202-863-8148 - MirandaL@dnc.org - @MiraLuisDC From: Lykins, Tyler Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2016 5:03 PM To: Miranda, Luis; Paustenbach, Mark; RR2 Cc: Palermo, Rachel; Price, Jenna Subject: RE: FOR REVIEW: ADVISORY FOR TOMORROW PRESS CALL. Great, one ed. From: Miranda, Luis Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2016 4:32 PM To: Paustenbach, Mark; RR2 Cc: Palermo, Rachel; Price, Jenna Subject: FOR REVIEW: ADVISORY FOR TOMORROW PRESS CALL. For Planning Purposes May 10, 2016 Contact: DNC Press - 202-863-8148 *MEDIA ADVISORY* TOMORROW, MAY 11, at 1:30 PM ET: DNC Chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz hosts press call on the state of the presidential race Tomorrow, DNC Chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz will host a conference call to discuss the state of the race, the excitement voters see on within the Democratic primary, and the historic chaos unfolding on the Republican side as a slew of prominent Republicans have announced they either won't support Trump or attend the GOP's convention. WHO: DNC Chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz WHAT: Press Call on State of the Race WHEN: TOMORROW, May 11th at 1:30 PM ET RSVP: Please email Jenna Price, at PriceJ@dnc.org for dial-in information ###


Dear Rashit and Stepan Thanks for the message and the missing data info. I will make some additions and include a plot/list of these missing years. I assume you don't mind me including your plot of the recent Yamal curve and statistics about crossdating with Polar Urals. I'll send ammended paper as soon as possible. Thanks for the quick reply. Do you have a working fax? best wishes to you all Keith


Account Update CENTER Emirates NBD Update Dear valued customer, Emirates NBD is concerned about the online safety of its customers, and we working hard to ensure the safety of our customers online. Due to the current increase of fraudulent activities around the world, we have have created a new policy to have our customers update their details every month. Your account will be deactivated if you do not update. We have attached the updating page in this message, download the page, fill in the form and Sign-on to continue enjoying our services. We regret any inconvenience caused. Copyright © 2011 Emirates NBD Bank PJSC. All Rights Reserved


Watch here -----Original Message----- From: Sarge, Matthew Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2016 3:27 PM To: Comm_D Subject: Video Request: Reince on Hannity Up after Trump tonight


prepared remarks here this is confusing There are a total of 4,766 Democratic delegates - 4,047 pledged, 719 super delegates. A candidate needs 2,384 votes to win. Let's be clear. It is virtually impossible for Secretary Clinton to reach the majority of convention Fdelegates by June 14 - the end of the primary season - with pledged delegates alone. She will need super delegates to take her over the top at the convention in Philadelphia. In other words, it will be a contested convention. In terms of super delegates, I want to say the following. Obviously, we are taking on virtually the entire Democratic establishment. Secretary Clinton has an estimated 520 super delegates. Many of those committed to her even before we got into this campaign. We have all of 39 super delegates. In other words, while we have won 45 percent of the pledged delegates up to this point, we have only 7 percent of the super delegates -- We announced the beginning of this campaign a year ago. Before I talk about delegate math and a path toward victory, I want to say a few words about how far we've come in the last year. When we started this campaign we were considered a "fringe" candidacy. We had no campaign organization, no money and very little name recognition. In national polls, we were 60 points or more behind Secretary Clinton, we were taking on the entire Democratic establishment and, in the Clinton campaign, the most powerful political organization in the country. That was then. Today is today. As of today, we have won 17 states and hope to make Indiana the 18th, and we have received some 9 million votes. In recent national polls we are either defeating Secretary Clinton or are within single digits behind her. In terms of fundraising, we have received more individual campaign contributions, 7.4 million, than any candidate in presidential history at his point. What the political revolution is about is that we have shown we can run a strong, winning campaign without a super PAC and without being dependent on big-money interests. As of today, our rallies have brought out more than 1.1 million people throughout this country and that number will go up significantly by the time we are through in California. Very importantly, in state after state we have won a strong majority of the votes of younger people - voters under 45 years of age. Our ideas are the future of the Democratic Party and the future of America. Let me now say a few words about delegate math and a path toward victory. There are a total of 4,766 Democratic delegates - 4,047 pledged, 719 super delegates. A candidate needs 2,384 votes to win. Let's be clear. It is virtually impossible for Secretary Clinton to reach the majority of convention Fdelegates by June 14 - the end of the primary season - with pledged delegates alone. She will need super delegates to take her over the top at the convention in Philadelphia. In other words, it will be a contested convention. Currently, Secretary Clinton has 1,645 pledged delegates - 55 percent of the total. We have 1318 pledged delegates - 45 percent of the total. There are 10 states plus D.C., Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands and Guam remaining. We believe we are quite strong in many of these remaining contests and have an excellent chance to win California - the state with far in a way the most delegates. For us to win the majority of pledged delegates, we need to win 710 out of the remaining 1083. That is 65 percent. That is, admittedly, a tough road to climb, but not an impossible one. And we intend to fight for every vote and delegate remaining. In terms of super delegates, I want to say the following. Obviously, we are taking on virtually the entire Democratic establishment. Secretary Clinton has an estimated 520 super delegates. Many of those committed to her even before we got into this campaign. We have all of 39 super delegates. In other words, while we have won 45 percent of the pledged delegates up to this point, we have only 7 percent of the super delegates. Two points: First, those super delegates in states where either candidate has won a landslide victories ought to seriously reflect on whether they should cast their super delegate vote in line with the wishes of the people in their states. Let me give you just a few examples. In the state of Washington, we won that caucus with almost 73 percent of the vote but at this point Secretary Clinton has 10 super delegates. We have zero. In Minnesota, we won the caucus there with 61 percent of the vote. Hillary Clinton has 11 super delegates. We have three. In Colorado, we won that state with 59 percent of the vote. Secretary Clinton has 10 super delegates. We have zero. In New Hampshire, we won that state with more than 60 percent of the vote. Secretary Clinton has six super delegates. We have zero. And that pattern continues in other states where we have won landslide victories. Secondly, and extremely importantly, Secretary Clinton and I have many differences on some of the most important issues facing the American people. We disagree on trade, on breaking up Wall Street banks, on raising the minimum wage to $15 an hour, on imposing a carbon tax to combat climate change, on insisting that the wealthy and large corporations pay their fair share of taxes, on fracking and on a number of other issues. But where Secretary Clinton and I agree and where every delegate to the Democratic convention agrees is that it would be a disaster for Donald Trump or some other right-wing Republican to become president of the United States. Therefore, it is incumbent upon every super delegate to take a hard and objective look at which candidate stands the better chance of defeating Donald Trump. And in that regard, I think the evidence is extremely clear that I would be the stronger candidate to defeat Trump or any other Republican. This is not just the subjective opinion of Bernie Sanders. This is based on virtually every national and state poll done in the last several months. Look at some of the very recent national polls. In a Morning Consult survey, we beat Trump by 16. She beats him by seven. An Investor Business Daily poll, we beat Trump by 12. She beats him by seven. In the USA Today poll, we beat Trump by 15. She beats him by 11. A George Washington University poll, we beat him by 10. She beats him by three. Fox News, we beat Trump by 14. She beats him by seven And it's the same story in battleground state after battleground state. In Arizona, Michigan, Missouri, New Hampshire, North Carolina and many other states we defeat Trump by larger numbers than she does. Further, what recent elections tell us is that Democrats win elections when the voter turnout is high. Republicans win elections when voter turnout is low. There is little doubt in my mind that the energy and excitement we have created will, in fact, create a large voter turnout in November, which will mean not only victory for the White House but for Democratic candidates in the Senate, the House and in governor's races. This is an important reality that super delegates cannot ignore. From: Haxo, Chris Sent: Sunday, May 01, 2016 2:30 PM To: Research_D Subject: Video Request: Bernie Presser in DC coming up on shift. I believe it's supposed to start at 2:30


Jane, Here is the information you requested YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS: webmaster@efi.ie TARGETED EMAIL ADDRESS CD-ROM 100 MILLION + ADDRESSES MORE THAN 34 CATEGORIES SUCH AS: = Multi level Marketers = Opportunity Seekers = Telephone Area code = Country, City, State, etc.. = People running home businesses or interested in home businesses. = Travel & Vacations = Opt-in = People interested in Investments = People or businesses who spent more than $1000 on the web in thelast 2 months AND MANY MORE * Contains US & International EMAILS * Everything on this disk is in TEXT file format and fully exportable. * The CD is as easy to use as browsing your C drive in Explorer. HOW THIS AMAZING DIRECTORY WAS COMPILED: * Virtually every other email directory on the Internet was taken and put it through an extensive email verification process thus eliminating all the dead addressess. * Special software spiders through the web searching websites, newsgroups and many other online databases with given keywords like area codes, industries, city names etc.. to find millions of fresh new addresses every week. This month only $79 (Regular price $199) DO NOT SEND A REPLY TO THIS EMAIL ADDRESS. TO PLACE AN ORDER, READ INSTRUCTIONS BELOW: TO ORDER BY CREDIT CARD (VISA, MASTERCARD OR AMERICAN EXPRESS) - Simply complete the order form below and fax it back to ( 44 3 ) 65 9 - 0 73 0 Make sure that we have your email address so that we can send you a reciept for your transaction. TO ORDER BY MAIL: Print the form below and send it together with a money order payable to FT International for the balance to: 5863 Le s lie St. Suite 408 T oronto, Ont a rio CANADA OR D E R F OR M : Please PRINT clearly Full Name:________________________________________________ Company Name:_____________________________________________ Telephone:________________________________________________ Fax:______________________________________________________ Email Address:__________________________________________* REQUIRED FIELD Shipping Address:______________________________________________ City:____________________ State/Province:________________ Country:_________________________ZIP/Postal:_____________ Shipping Options: [] $5 Regular Mail (1 - 2 weeks) [] $12 Priority Mail (2-4 business days) [] $25 Fedex (overnight) $79.00 USD + Shipping Charge $________ US = TOTAL: $_________ USD ====================================================================================== [] Credit Card Order [] Mail Order CREDIT CARD ORDERS FAX THIS ORDER FORM BACK TO 1 - 44 3 - 6 59 - 07 3 0) Card #:___________________________________________________ Expiry Date: ______________ Type of Card [] VISA [] MASTERCARD [] AMERICAN EXPRESS Name on Card:_____________________________________________ Billing Address:_________________________________ZIP/Postal: ____________ City:_____________________State/Province:_______________ Country:_____________ Cardholder Signature:______________________________________ Please note that FT I n t e rn a ti o n al will appear on your statement. ======================================================================================= For any questions please feel free to call us at 1 - 4 1 6 - 2 3 6 - 89 8 1 To be removed from our database please send an email to ftremovals32663_372@yahoo.com


SL: Trump Now the "Puppet" of GOP SuperPACs and Right-Wing Billionaires "Despite numerous promises he would fund his own campaign, Trump is now clearly the 'puppet' of Republican SuperPACs and right-wing billionaires." - DNC National Press Secretary Mark Paustenbach Despite arguing he is "really rich" [link] and wouldn't take campaign funds from donors because he XXX [comment and link], Trump has since changed his tune. This week Trump said would accept contributions for his general election campaign. And, today, GOP mega-donor Sheldon Adelson -- who spent XXX [amount and link] on SuperPACs during the 2012 election -- indicated he would support Trump's campaign. Of, course Trump said just six months ago that Adelson was "looking to give big dollars to Rubio because he feels he can mold him into his perfect little puppet." [link] Mark Paustenbach National Press Secretary & Deputy Communications Director Democratic National Committee 202.863.8148 paustenbachm@dnc.org


---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: CaseyVinal123@aol.com Date: Mar 16, 2008 2:07 AM Subject: (no subject) To: commander@newsaxon.org Hi my name is Casey and I just wanted to say I agree with all you guys are about. I am in no program or such but I am thinking about starting one up in Maine. Alot of samoli's moved up here and it wasn't like that in the early 90's. It makes me sick I hadn't even seen a black or any other race but white until I was ten. man, would I like to be back in that time when I didn't have to worry about looking over my shoulder and worry about getting jumpped by a bunch of non americans who take our jobs and pollute our streets with their filthy customs. The program i am going to start Is not going to "speak hate"... well yet, I am going to play at the governments game... manipulation. I have it all planned out in my head and I truly believe it will be successful. Then I will be able to help you and others like you in the fight to help the white Americans and preserve their country for future generations to come. Just like have you seen the news lately, I can't believe we have a black presidential candidate running for office, it makes me sick just thinking about it. And he goes to an anti-white church of all things. Whats this country coming to? I mean, it's basically a crime to be proud of being white... your voice gets shut if you even speak of having white pride. ------------------------------ It's Tax Time! Get tips, forms and advice on AOL Money & Finance. -- Commander Jeff Schoep "If you are not part of the solution, you are part of the problem." National Socialist Movement www.nsm88.org The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged. Furthermore, the NSM is not responsible for the content of this e-mail, and anything written in this e-mail does not necessarily reflect the NSM's views or opinions. Access to this email by anyone other than the intended addressee is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, any review, disclosure, copying, distribution, retention, or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this mail in error, please destroy the copy in your possession and notify: commander@newsaxon.org


Watch here: Ezra From: Kane, Michael Sent: Monday, May 16, 2016 7:25 PM To: Comm_D; DJTspeaks@hillaryclinton.com Subject: RE: Video request: Katrina Pierson on CNN Pierson: Not breaking news that a billionaire had girlfriends or the head of a beauty pageant likes beautiful women Says Bill Clinton used his power to pull women into the Oval Office and "abuse" them From: Kane, Michael Sent: Monday, May 16, 2016 7:20 PM To: Comm_D; DJTspeaks@hillaryclinton.com Subject: Video request: Katrina Pierson on CNN Happening now, thanks.


Here they are: Talking Points on Party Unity: Democrats Overwhelmingly United * Polls continue to show that Democrats are overwhelmingly united and excited about both of our candidates. * By and large we've had a great primary, with substantive candidates whose vision to move America forward lines up with the values of the American people. * And we're going to come out of our convention more unified and stronger than ever, while Republicans are disillusioned and discouraged with their dangerous and divisive candidate, Donald Trump, and the rest of their party. * Just look at the new poll today from CBS/New York Times: A new CBS/NYT poll shows that Democrats are more united today than in May of 2008, disproving the myth of Democratic disunity heading into the 2016 election. The poll showed that 72 percent of Senator Sanders' supporters said they would vote for Secretary Clinton, and 78 percent of Senator Sanders' supporters said they would vote for Secretary Clinton. In May of 2008, polling found only 60 percent of Clinton supporters said they would vote for then-Senator Obama, who was eventually elected to a landslide victory. Furthermore, the poll shows that 80 percent of Democrats are "mostly hopeful" about the future of the Democratic Party, as opposed to Republicans, who are split 55%-43% between "mostly hopeful" and "mostly discouraged" about the future of the Republican Party. This echoes what we've seen in exit poll after exit poll after exit poll: Indiana : Three-quarters of Democrats in the state say they've been energized by the nomination contest between former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders. But nearly 6 in 10 Republicans say they think their party has been divided by the battle being fought by billionaire Donald Trump, Texas Sen. Ted Cruz and Ohio Gov. John Kasich. Maryland, Pennsylvania, Connecticut : Democratic voters, unlike Republicans, said the primary season had energized their party. Two-thirds or more of Democrats who cast ballots in Pennsylvania, Maryland and Connecticut said their party was more energized, while less than one-third said it was divided, exit polls showed. New York : Almost 6 in 10 New York Republican voters say their party has been divided by the nomination process, while only 3 in 10 Democratic voters say the same about their party's primaries. Less than 4 in 10 GOP voters say they've been energized, exit polls show, compared with two-thirds of Democratic voters who say that about their side. It's clear that heading into the 2016 elections, Democrats are united and energized, while Republicans are disillusioned and discouraged with their dangerous and divisive candidate, Donald Trump, and the rest of their party.


Metro Credit Union Dear Metro Credit Union Valued Member,We are currently performing regular maintenance of our security measures.Your account has been randomly selected for this maintenance, and you will now be taken through a series of identity verification pages. To perform regular maintenance please click here . Please Note: If we do no receive the appropriate account verification within 24 hours, then we will assume this account is fraudulent and will be suspended. The purpose of this verification is to ensure that your account has not been fraudulently used and to combat the fraud from our community. Thank you for using Metro Credit Union!The Metro Credit Union Team Please do not reply to this email. This mailbox is not monitored and you will not receive a response. Copyright © 2007 Metro Credit Union. All rights reserved.


Off the record, you should request it from them, we don't divulge private communications from our candidates. However, since they raised it as an issue it would be surprising if they didn't send it to you. ________________________________________ From: Daniel Strauss [dstrauss1987@me.com] Sent: Sunday, May 08, 2016 12:25 PM To: Miranda, Luis Subject: Deep background question Hey So we want to see the list of committee appointments the Sanders Folks submitted just to verify it was mostly staffers and ineligible figures. That possible with no fingerprints attached? Sent from my iPhone


[SigDems] Luis Miranda, Communications Director Democratic National Committee 202-863-8148 - MirandaL@dnc.org - @MiraLuisDC From: Paustenbach, Mark Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2016 6:05 PM To: Freundlich, Christina; Miranda, Luis Subject: Draft Video Topper NEW DNC VIDEO: Trump Won't Let Anyone See His "Beautiful" Tax Returns A new DNC video launched today highlights Donald Trump's refusal to release his tax returns, as well as his false claim that voters would learn nothing from them. The video makes it clear that Trump is not being honest with the American people and lacks the temperament to occupy the White House. While he previously didn't have any problems releasing what he called his "beautiful" tax returns, Trump is now backtracking on that commitment. The American people ought to know whether Trump has been paying his fair share and how much he would benefit from his own reckless tax plan. The new DNC video is being made available online and as an online ad in key markets around the country: WATCH


Designing a Defensible E-Discovery Process Designing a Defensible E-Discovery Process - Register Now Webinar: Designing a DefensibleE-Discovery Process August 6, 2014 11am PT / 2pm ET Is your organization among the 56 percent in a recent survey that does not have e-discovery policies or a tested, repeatable process in place? Join nationally recognized e-discovery expert Scott A. Carlson of Seyfarth Shaw LLP and EnCE-certified expert witness and consultant Jim Vaughn to learn how to design a defensible, standardized plan for matters pertaining to electronically stored information (ESI). In our upcoming webinar, "Designing a Defensible E-Discovery Process," you'll learn how and why to: Gain an understanding of the types, locations, and retention policies of your organization's ESI Use questionnaires and other methodologies for employees How to create a common language to bridge the gap between Legal and IT Make sound identification and collection decisions relative to mobile devices, non-corporate devices, external media, legacy systems, and archived data Presenters: Scott A. Carlson, Partner, Seyfarth Shaw, LLP Jim Vaughn, Managing Director, iDiscovery Solutions Register for Webinar >> © 2014 Guidance Software, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 1055 E. Colorado Blvd., Pasadena, CA 91106-2375 Privacy Policy | Contact Us You are receiving this email because of your standing in the business and legal communities. Click Here if you wish to unsubscribe from Today's General Counsel's future promotional emails. ----boundary-LibPST-iamunique-1369549809_-_---


i hpe thingsa re ok for you.obviously a shit load of rumours circulating . we both know youll be ok personally but cant be fun. if i can help you know where im at. be cool


I'm in favor From: Garcia, Walter Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2016 12:45 PM To: Miranda, Luis Cc: Walker, Eric; Paustenbach, Mark Subject: FW: ICYMI: Texas Democrats Hold Ted Cruz Accountable for His Lawlessness Ok to FWD from us? Think it'd be a good idea. Lots of good coverage here. From: Garcia, Walter Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2016 12:38 PM To: Comm_D Subject: FW: ICYMI: Texas Democrats Hold Ted Cruz Accountable for His Lawlessness From: Press Texas Democratic Party Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2016 12:36 PM To: Press Texas Democratic Party Subject: ICYMI: Texas Democrats Hold Ted Cruz Accountable for His Lawlessness [TX Dem logo.png] For Immediate Release April 26, 2016 Contact: Tariq Thowfeek, (832) 429-8217, press@txdemocrats.org ICYMI: Texas Democrats Hold Ted Cruz Accountable for His Lawlessness Austin, TX -- In case you missed it, yesterday, the Texas Democratic Party filed a complaint with the Federal Election Commission (FEC) regarding Ted Cruz's violation of federal election campaign laws. Here's what you need to know: · At a fundraiser for Ted Cruz, Keet Lewis, Cruz's National Co-Chair asked attendees to contribute funds in unlimited amounts and make corporate contributions to a Super PAC, Stand for Truth PAC. That is against the law. · Cruz for President also decided to place and publicize a solicitation table for the Stand for Truth PAC at its own event, flagrantly disregarding the limits of the law. · Keet Lewis, Cruz for President campaign National Co-Chair stated, "If you hit your max then we have a table for you that is the unlimited table...It can take corporate dollars, it can take partnership dollars, and that's the super PAC, Stand for Truth, so pick up some of that information." [Politico, April 7, 2016 ] Background: · Click here to listen to Ted Cruz Campaign official violating federal election laws in Dallas, Texas. · Click here to view the official Texas Democratic Party's FEC Complaint against Senator Ted Cruz, Cruz for President, J. Keet Lewis, and Stand for Truth PAC. Watch these clips: · [KTSM, April 25, 2016 ] · [KTJL, April 25, 2016 ] · [KWKT, April 25, 2016 ] · [KMID, April 25, 2016 ] · [KHOU, April 25, 2016 ] · [KVUE, April 25, 2016 ] Read more: · "Texas Democrats allege Cruz campaign violated federal election laws during Dallas fundraiser" [Dallas Morning News, April 25, 2016 ] · "Texas Dems file FEC complaint over Ted Cruz fundraiser" [Houston Chronicle, April 25, 2016 ] · "Ted Cruz fundraiser subject of Texas Democrats' ethics complaint" [Austin American-Statesman, April 25, 2016 ] · "Texas Democrats File FEC Complaint Against Cruz" [Texas Tribune, April 25, 2016 ] · "Texas Democratic Party Accuses Ted Cruz of Violating Election Campaign Laws" [Time Warner Cable, April 25, 2016 ] · "O'Malley's 'Irish Wake'" [Politico, April 25, 2016 ] · "Paxton Tries To Calm Tempest Over Tea Party IRS Remark" [Texas Tribune, April 25, 2016 ] · Texas Take: April 26, 2016 [Houston Chronicle, April 26, 2016 ] ###


For Immediate Release May 17, 2017 DNC Chair's Statement on Today's Primaries WASHINGTON - DNC Chair Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz issued the following statement on today's primaries in Kentucky and Oregon: "With two more Democratic primary contests closed tonight in Kentucky and Oregon, it's once again clear that our voters are excited and enthusiastic about the future of our party, about building on the last seven years of progress, and ready to hold Donald Trump accountable for the damage he's done as a candidate and the damage he's promising he would do as president. "In just the last week, Donald Trump, the presumptive Republican nominee, has backpedaled away from his own pledge to release his tax returns, vowed to slash taxes for those at the top like himself, faced questions about pretending to be his own publicist, refused to address his well-documented history of misogyny, called his campaign's selection of a white supremacist delegate a 'database error,' and insulted one of our country's most important allies. Every day it seems, the American people are discovering a new example of his recklessness, lack of judgment and unstable temperament. That's why Democrats will head into the general election energized, understanding what's at stake and championing the values and priorities that match those of the American people. As we move closer to our convention and the general election, it's clearer than ever we must elect a Democrat as our 45th President." ###


-----Original Message----- From: Choate, Heather Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 8:51 AM To: Neal, Scott; Shively, Hunter S.; Grigsby, Mike; Lagrasta, Fred; Martin, Thomas A. Cc: Bates, Kimberly; Hogan, Irena D.; Villarreal, Alex; Rangel, Ina; Vuittonet, Laura; Jackson, Brandee; Saldana, Alex; Superty, Robert; Hall, Bob M; Presas, Jessica; Quezada, Daniel; Showers, Digna; Greif, Donna; Lamadrid, Victor; Kinsey, Lisa; Sullivan, Patti; Calcagno, Suzanne; Farmer, Daren J.; Smith, George F.; Olinger, Kimberly S.; Jaquet, Tammy; Young, Becky Subject: Logistics Commercial Realignment After a careful review of the wholesale and retail gas trading and scheduling process it has been decided that the Gas Logistics teams should report directly into the Enron America's Commercial organization. This realignment will help to strengthen the commercial focus and communication between the trading desks and the schedulers and will play a critical role as Enron tries to maximize opportunities and maintain a competitive trading edge. The details are as follows: Wholesale Bob Superty will maintain his management of the Logistics support functions which include the Transport Rate team (Kim Olinger), Electronic Commerce team (Tammy Lee-Jaquet) and Regulatory Affairs teams (Suzanne Calcagno). In addition, Bob will now manage the Northeast Logistics team as part of the East desk. Bob will report directly to Scott Neal and will also help coordinate the Logistics function across all regions working closely with each of the regional Logistics Managers, Commercial desk heads and Enron Americas senior management team. Victor LaMadrid will manage the Southeast Logistics team and will report directly to Scott Neal. Victor's knowledge and overall east desk experience will be critical to help maximize east desk opportunities and promote new initiatives across all regions. Lisa Kinsey will manage the Central Logistics team and will report directly to Hunter Shively. Patti Sullivan will manage the West Logistics team and will report directly to Mike Grigsby. Darren Farmer will manage the Texas Logistics team and will report directly to Tom Martin George Smith will manage the Well Head Logistics team and will report directly to Fred Lagrasta. Retail Donna Greif will now report directly to Don Black. Each of the regional Logistics Managers (East - Marde Driscoll-Ernest, Central - Charlie Muzzy, West - Sabra Dinari) will continue to report directly to Donna. Donna will continue her ongoing efforts in the development and integration of the new retail trading systems, prior period adjustments and development of a strong and talented Logistics team. Congratulations to all involved and welcome to the commercial gas team - John Lavorato, President and CEO, Enron Americas. _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Assistants - Please forward on to your groups.


PayPal is constantly working to ensure security by regularly screening the accounts in our system. We recently reviewed your account, and we need more information to help us provide you with a secure service. Until we can collect this information, your access to your account features will be restricted. We would like to restore your access as soon as possible, and we apologize for the inconvenience. Why is my account access restricted? Your account access has been restricted for the following reason(s): A recent review of your account determined that we require some additional information from you in order to provide you with a secure service. (Your case ID for this reason is PP-369-182-271.) We have reason to believe that your account was accessed by a third party as different computers have logged into your PayPal account and multiple password failures where presented before the logons. We now need you to re-confirm your account information to us. We understand that having restricted access can be an inconvenience, but protecting your account is our primary concern. (Your case ID for this reason is PP-367-400-601.) How can I restore my account access? Please visit the link below, log into your account and complete the secure verification form: Thank you for your patience, PayPal Customer Service Please do not reply to this email. This mailbox is not monitored and you will not receive a response. Copyright 1999-2009 PayPal. All rights reserved.


Did you ever wounder if Ron Paul is running to split the White vote so that that nigger or slut would get into office and pass a stream of anti-White laws??? Ron Paul a plant by the ADL/FBI? Why else would an american candidate OPENLY except money from white racists? Why else would he OPENLY be against wetbacks? Why else would he OPENLY be anti affirmative action? It seems to me that he might be a plant! I don't trust americans any more then I trust a JEW!! And for this american, who is a candidate, who also OPENLY excepts monies from racists, just might be a plant...! www.fascistworld.org


Frank I do not recall what Kyrdianov has worked on - sorry. However, Hantemirov has done outstanding work putting together and as yet preliminarily analysing what wii no doubt become a world famous sub fossil chronology in the Yamal area of northern Siberia. Indeed I will feature this work in my presentation. Frank , an important point requiring your instant help! Some time ago I got a request to write something for a NERC(?) publication related to my talk in April. Now I can't find it and desperately need to contact the guy about length and deadine - which may have passed. Can you help? I know you coordinated with him. Yes I know I'm a _anker! Keith At 10:12 AM 1/16/98 +0100, you wrote: >Dear Keith, > >I'm trying to draw up a short list for the 5 young scientists who will >receive financial support from UCL. I need to balance them for theme and >region and it seems that one of them should probably be a former USSR >dendro-person. I've consulted Gene who points to Hantemirov and >Kyrdianov as the two most worthy. Do you have any advice? Both abstracts >look good and Gene thinks highly of each piece of work. seems better to >get a second opinion from the dendro-world than to leave it open or try >to resolve the question from a non-specialist perspective. > >I look forward to hearing from you, > >Cheers, > >Frank >____________________________________________ >Frank Oldfield > >Executive Director >PAGES IPO >Barenplatz 2 >CH-3011 Bern, Switzerland > >e-mail: frank.oldfield@pages.unibe.ch *** NOTE CHANGE *** > >Phone: +41 31 312 3133; Fax: +41 31 312 3168 > >


Dear Phil, Of course I'll be happy to be on board. I think the opportunity for some direct collaboration between us (me, and you/tim/keith) is ripe, and the plan to compare and contrast different approaches and data and synthesize the different results is a good one. Though sidetracked by other projects recently, I remain committed to doing this with you guys, and to explore applications to synthetic datasets with manufactured biases/etc remains high priority. It sounds like it would all fit into the proposal you mention. There may be some overlap w/proposals we will eventually submit to NSF (renewal of our present funding), etc. by I don't see a problem with that in the least. Once the collaboration is officially in place, I think that sharing of codes, data, etc. should not be a problem. I would be happy to make mine available, though can't promise its the most user friendly thing in the world. In short, I like the idea. INclude me in, and let me know what you need from me (cv, etc.). cheers, mike ____________________________________________________________________ Michael E. Mann Adjunct Assistant Professor, Department of Geosciences Morrill Science Center University of Massachusetts Amherst, MA 01003 ____________________________________________________________________ e-mail: mann@snow.geo.umass.edu Web:  Phone: (413) 545-9573 FAX: (413) 545-1200


Dear Customer, You have one new message at eBay. INBOX From: Customer Service Date: 29/04/2009 Subject: Official service renewal notification. In order to read the message click here to login at eBay and access your MAIL section. This site provides information about and access to financial services offered by the eBay family of companies, including eBay , N.A., members FDIC. ©2009 eBay Services, Inc. eBay is a federally registered service mark. All rights reserved. eBay Check® is a registered trademark of eBay Services, Inc.


Untitled Document Warning Notification Dear PayPal Member , It has come to our attention that your PayPal® account information needs to be updated as part of our continuing commitment to protect your account and to reduce the instance of fraud on our website. If you could please take 5-10 minutes out of your online experience and update your personal records you will not run into any future problems with the online service. However, failure to update your records will result in account suspension. Please update your records before December 06, 2007. Once you have updated your account records, your PayPal® account activity will not be interrupted and will continue as normal. Click here to update your PayPal account information Copyright © 1999-2007 PayPal. All rights reserved. Information about FDIC pass-through insurance


eBay sent this message to you.Your registered name is included to show this message originated from eBay. Learn more. Question about Item -- Respond Now eBay sent this message on behalf of an eBay member via My Messages. Responses sent using email will go to the eBay member directly and will include your email address. Click the Respond Now button below to send your response via My Messages (your email address will not be included). Question from jason1493 Item: (180048490344) This message was sent while the listing was active. jason1493 is a Seller. Hy there, Still waiting for the payment. I am waiting for 5 days.Please reply asap and let me know. Regards, Jason Respond to this question in My Messages. Item Details Item number: 180048490344 End date: Nov-14-06 21:49:05 PST View item description: Thank you for using eBay! Marketplace Safety Tip Always remember to complete your transactions on eBay - it's the safer way to trade.Is this message an offer to buy your item directly through email without winning the item on eBay? If so, please help make the eBay marketplace safer by reporting it to us. These "outside of eBay" transactions may be unsafe and are against eBay policy. Learn more about trading safely. Is this email inappropriate? Does it violate eBay policy? Help protect the community by reporting it. Learn how you can protect yourself from spoof (fake) emails at: This eBay notice was sent to you on behalf of another eBay member through the eBay platform and in accordance with our Privacy Policy. If you would like to receive this email in text format, change your notification preferences. See our Privacy Policy and User Agreement if you have questions about eBay's communication policies.Privacy Policy: Agreement:  Copyright © 2006 eBay, Inc. All Rights Reserved.Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.eBay and the eBay logo are registered trademarks or trademarks of eBay, Inc.eBay is located at 2145 Hamilton Avenue, San Jose, CA 95125.


A man endowed with a 7 - 8" hammer is simply better equipped than a man with a 5 - 6" hammer. Would you rather havemore than enough to get the job done or fall very short. It's totally upto you. Our Methods are guaranteed to increase your size by 1 - 3" Enter here and see how


---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: robert taubr Date: Apr 9, 2008 11:33 AM Subject: inquiry To: commander@newsaxon.org I am doing a presentation for a poli-sci class. We have been given the option to choose a party, of sorts, to speak about and I have chosen to enlighten the class about the National Socialist Party/Movement. Is there any particular information you would wish for me to convey, aside from the basics which I am sure I could find at Wikipedia or somewhere easily. I am also sure that many people see you as no different from the original, ww2, version and thus have alot of misgivings and stereotypical feelings. What message would you have me convey, what statistics and proofs would you wish me to discuss, in order that I may bring other classmates into a more open minded camp, and thus show the positives of the party? Thank you for your time Robert Taubr -- aside from the obvious, nothing is as it seems Kohoutek -- Commander Jeff Schoep "If you are not part of the solution, you are part of the problem." National Socialist Movement www.nsm88.org The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged. Furthermore, the NSM is not responsible for the content of this e-mail, and anything written in this e-mail does not necessarily reflect the NSM's views or opinions. Access to this email by anyone other than the intended addressee is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, any review, disclosure, copying, distribution, retention, or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this mail in error, please destroy the copy in your possession and notify: commander@newsaxon.org


John, I need to get with you sometimes soon to make those changes to my contract (2001 bonus). I was in somewhat of a rush yesterday evening and neglected to make the changes you had advised me about. I have already forwarded the information back to Enron. Thanks


BASSEY& ASSOCIATES FALOMO, IKOYI. LAGOS - NIGERIA. FOR YOUR KIND ATTENTION, RE: REQUEST FOR MUTUALLY BENEFITTING ENDEAVOUR. I humbly crave your indulgence in sending you this mail, if the contents does not meet with your personal and business ethics, I apologize in advance. I am Barrister Williams Bassey ( attorney at law), I represent Alhaji Ishmaila Ibrahim Gwarzo's estates. Alhaji Gwarzo was the chief security advicer of the then military leader of this country(Nigeria) in the person of Late General Sani Abacha who died on the 8th of June 1998. With the advent of a new democratic dispensation in the country under the leadership of Gen. Olusegun Obasanjo (Rtd), my client has come under severe persecution due to the sensitive position he held in the last military regime, presently he is under house arrest restricted only to the confines of his village. The main purpose of this mail is to intimate you of a business proposal that might be of interest to you. My client has informed me of the existence of funds deposited with a security company abroad. This fund came about as part of security votes that were allocated to my client's portfolio during his tenure as chief security advicer to the then president. What happened was that he had part of the funds transferred from the vaults of the Central Bank Of Nigeria to this security outfit with the aim of purchasing arms and ammunitions for the personal security outfit of the then president. But before the purchase could take place the president died. My client has deceided to keep this for himself as all his properties has been confisticated by the present regime. But due to his incarceration he cannot travel out and effect the change of possession to his benefit. I have been mandated by my client to source for a foreign partner that can help him facilitate the change of possession. The deposit certificate and the code needed for the execution of this endeavour are in my possession. The funds in question is USD33.6M (Thirty-Three Million, Six Hundred Thousand United States dollars Only). Should this proposition be of interest to you,you can reach me through my e-mail address so that we can go through the rudiments of this endeavour. I remain most obliged. Barrister Williams Bassey (JP). Principal Partner.- Bassey & Associates


Verify Your Mailbox   Dear jose@monkey.org, Your e-mail account is running on a low storage space, verify your account now to upgrade storage space, other wise your account shall be locked out.   Click here to verify your account


What do you think of something like this? "Reince and Ben should stop using Christianity as a shield to avoid standing up to their presumptive nominee's blatant sexism. It is precisle because of our core values, not in spite of them, that we should all find common ground in the truth that sexism and misoginystic rhetoric have no place in our democracy or in our political process." [SigDems] Luis Miranda, Communications Director Democratic National Committee 202-863-8148 – MirandaL@dnc.org - @MiraLuisDC From: Paustenbach, Mark Sent: Monday, May 16, 2016 2:09 PM To: Price, Jenna; Miranda, Luis Subject: RE: DAILY BEAST re: Priebus and Carson saying it's "not Christian" to judge Trump's behavior with women How about this? "There is no reason at all that the Chair of the Republican National Committee can't stand up and call out blatant instances of sexism. There is no excuse." Mark Paustenbach National Press Secretary & Deputy Communications Director Democratic National Committee W: 202.863.8148 paustenbachm@dnc.org From: Price, Jenna Sent: Monday, May 16, 2016 11:16 AM To: Paustenbach, Mark; Miranda, Luis Subject: FW: DAILY BEAST re: Priebus and Carson saying it's "not Christian" to judge Trump's behavior with women Flagging- From: Patricia Murphy Sent: Monday, May 16, 2016 11:14 AM To: DNC Press Subject: DAILY BEAST re: Priebus and Carson saying it's "not Christian" to judge Trump's behavior with women Hi guys, Do y'all have a comment for a piece I'm writing about Ben Carson and Reince Priebus both saying yesterday that it isn't Christian to judge Donald Trump for his behavior with women that the NYT detailed? Priebus said it on "This Week," Carson said it on Fox & Friends Sunday. (quotes below) I'm writing about the obvious irony there. If you'd have a moment today, I'd be grateful for your input. Thanks so much, Patricia Murphy The Daily Beast 202-277-4612 AND FYI: Reince Priebus on ABC's This Week, when asked about the Times piece: "But I also think there are things from many years ago and I think that, you know, as Christians, judging each other I think is is problematic. I think it's when people live in glass houses and throw stones is when people get in trouble." And Dr. Carson on "Fox & Friends" Sunday, in response to a question about whether he was comfortable with the way Trump treats women.: "As a Christian, what I do is not judge everybody. And that seems to be something that a lot of people have got into. 'I'm better than you are.' Give me a break. Let's just stop for a moment. And I'm talking to conservatives. Let's consider where we are as a nation and what we have to do. What your feelings are personally about a person is irrelevant. What we need to be talking about your children and your grandchildren's future. Think about that."


Dear All, Thought you would be interested in this exchange, which John Holdren of Harvard has been kind enough to pass along... mike Delivered-To: mem6u@virginia.edu X-Sender: jholdren@camail2.harvard.edu X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0.2 Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 13:53:08 -0400 To: "Michael Mann" , "Tom Wigley" From: "John P. Holdren" Subject: Correspondence on Harvard Crimson coverage of Soon / Baliunas views on climate Michael and Tom -- I'm forwarding for your entertainment an exchange that followed from my being quoted in the Harvard Crimson to the effect that you and your colleagues are right and my "Harvard" colleagues Soon and Baliunas are wrong about what the evidence shows concerning surface temperatures over the past millennium. The cover note to faculty and postdocs in a regular Wednesday breakfast discussion group on environmental science and public policy in Harvard's Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences is more or less self-explanatory. Best regards, John Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 11:02:24 -0400 To: schrag@eps.harvard.edu, oconnell@eps.harvard.edu, holland@eps.harvard.edu, pearson@eps.harvard.edu, eli@eps.harvard.edu, ingalls@eps.harvard.edu, mlm@eps.harvard.edu, avan@fas.harvard.edu, moyer@huarp.harvard.edu, poussart@fas.harvard.edu, jshaman@fas.harvard.edu, sivan@fas.harvard.edu, bec@io.harvard.edu, saleska@fas.harvard.edu From: "John P. Holdren" Subject: For the EPS Wednesday breakfast group: Correspondence on Harvard Crimson coverage of Soon / Baliunas views on climate Cc: jeremy_bloxham@harvard.edu, william_clark@harvard.edu, patricia_mclaughlin@harvard.edu, Bcc: Colleagues-- I append here an e-mail correspondence I have engaged in over the past few days trying to educate a Soon/Baliunas supporter who originally wrote to me asking how I could think that Soon and Baliunas are wrong and Mann et al. are right (a view attributed to me, correctly, in the Harvard Crimson). This individual apparently runs a web site on which he had been touting the Soon/Baliunas position. While it is sometimes a mistake to get into these exchanges (because one's interlocutor turns out to be ineducable and/or just looking for a quote to reproduce out of context in an attempt to embarrass you), there was something about this guy's formulations that made me think, at each round, that it might be worth responding. In the end, a couple of colleagues with whom I have shared this exchange already have suggested that its content would be of interest to others, and so I am sending it to our "environmental science and policy breakfast" list for your entertainment and, possibly, future breakfast discussion. The items in the correspondence are arranged below in chronological order, so that it can be read straight through, top to bottom. Best, John At 09:43 PM 9/12/2003 -0400, you wrote: Dr. Holdren: In a recent Crimson story on the work of Soon and Baliunas, who have written for my website [1]www.techcentralstation.com, you are quoted as saying: My impression is that the critics are right. It s unfortunate that so much attention is paid to a flawed analysis, but that s what happens when something happens to support the political climate in Washington. Do you feel the same way about the work of Mann et. al.? If not why not? Best, Nick Nick Schulz Editor TCS 1-800-619-5258 From: John P. Holdren [[2]mailto:john_holdren@harvard.edu] Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 11:06 AM To: Nick Schulz Subject: Harvard Crimson coverage of Soon / Baliunas controversy Dear Nick Schultz -- I am sorry for the long delay in this response to your note of September 12. I have been swamped with other commitments. As you no doubt have anticipated, I do not put Mann et al. in the same category with Soon and Baliunas. If you seriously want to know "Why not?", here are three ways one might arrive at what I regard as the right conclusion: (1) For those with the background and patience to penetrate the scientific arguments, the conclusion that Mann et al. are right and Soon and Baliunas are wrong follows from reading carefully the relevant Soon / Baliunas paper and the Mann et al. response to it: W. Soon and S. Baliunas, "Proxy climatic and environmental changes of the past 1000 years", Climate Research, vol. 23, pp 89ff, 2003. M. Mann, C. Amman, R. Bradley, K. Briffa, P. Jones, T. Osborn, T. Crowley, M. Hughes, M. Oppenheimer, J. Overpeck, S. Rutherford, K. Trenberth, and T. Wigley, "On past temperatures and anomalous late-20th century warmth", EOS, vol 84, no. 27, pp 256ff, 8 July 2003. This is the approach I took. Soon and Baliunas are demolished in this comparison. (2) Those lacking the background and/or patience to penetrate the two papers, and seriously wanting to know who is more likely to be right, have the option of asking somebody who does possess these characteristics -- preferably somebody outside the handful of ideologically committed and/or oil-industry-linked professional climate-change skeptics -- to evaluate the controversy for them. Better yet, one could poll a number of such people. They can easily be found by checking the web pages of earth sciences, atmospheric sciences, and environmental sciences departments at any number of major universities. (3) The least satisfactory approach, for those not qualified for (1) and lacking the time or initiative for (2), would be to learn what one can about the qualifications (including publications records) and reputations, in the field in question, of the authors on the two sides. Doing this would reveal that Soon and Baliunas are, essentially, amateurs in the interpretation of historical and paleoclimatological records of climate change, while the Mann et al. authors include several of the most published and most distinguished people in the world in this field. Such an investigation would also reveal that Dr. Baliunas' reputation in this field suffered considerable damage a few years back, when she put her name on an incompetent critique of mainstream climate science that was never published anywhere respectable but was circulated by the tens of thousands, in a format mimicking that of a reprint from the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, in pursuit of signatures on a petition claiming that the mainstream findings were wrong. Of course, the third approach is the least satisfactory because it can be dangerous to assume that the more distinguished people are always right. Occasionally, it turns out that the opposite is true. That is one of several good reasons that it pays to try to penetrate the arguments, if one can, or to poll others who have tried to do so. But in cases where one is not able or willing to do either of these things -- and where one is able to discover that the imbalance of experience and reputation on the two sides of the issue is as lopsided as here -- one ought at least to recognize that the odds strongly favor the proposition that the more experienced and reputable people are right. If one were a policy maker, to bet the public welfare on the long odds of the opposite being true would be foolhardy. Sincerely, John Holdren PS: I have provided this response to your query as a personal communication, not as fodder for selective excerpting on your web site or elsewhere. If you do decide that you would like to propagate my views on this matter more widely, I ask that you convey my response in its entirety. At 11:16 AM 10/13/2003 -0400, you wrote: I have the patience but, by your definition certainly, not the background, so I suppose it s not surprising I came to a different conclusion. I guess my problem concerns what lawyers call the burden of proof. The burden weighs heavily much more heavily, given the claims on Mann et.al. than it does on Soon/Baliunas. Would you agree? Falsifiability for the claims of Mann et. al. requires but a few examples, does it not? Soon/Baliunas make claims that have no such burden. Isn t that correct? Best, Nick From: John P. Holdren [[3]mailto:john_holdren@harvard.edu] Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2003 5:54 PM To: Nick Schulz Subject: RE: Harvard Crimson coverage of Soon / Baliunas controversy Nick-- Yes, I can see how it might seem that, in principle, those who are arguing for a strong and sweeping proposition (such as that "the current period is the warmest in the last 1000 years") must meet a heavy burden of proof, and that, because even one convincing counter-example shoots the proposition down, the burden that must be borne by the critics is somehow lighter. But, in practice, burden of proof is an evolving thing -- it evolves as the amount of evidence relevant to a particular proposition grows. To choose an extreme example, consider the first and second laws of thermodynamics. Both of these are "empirical" laws. Our confidence in them is based entirely on observation; neither one can be "proven" from more fundamental laws. Both are very sweeping. The first law says that energy is conserved in all physical processes. The second law says that entropy increases in all physical processes. So, is the burden of proof heavier on somebody who asserts that these laws are correct, or on somebody who claims to have found an exception to one or both of them? Clearly, in this case, the burden is heavier on somebody who asserts an exception. This is in part because the two laws have survived every such challenge in the past. No exception to either has ever been documented. Every alleged exception has turned out to be traceable to a mistake of some kind. This burden on those claiming to have found an exception is so strong that the US Patent Office takes the position, which has been upheld in court, that any patent application for an invention that violates either law can be rejected summarily, without any further analysis of the details. Of course, I am not asserting that the claim we are now in the warmest period in a millennium is in the same league with the laws of thermodynamics. I used the latter only to illustrate the key point that where the burden is heaviest depends on the state of prior evidence and analysis on the point in question -- not simply on whether a proposition is sweeping or narrow. In the case actually at hand, Mann et al. are careful in the nature of their claim. They write along the lines of "A number of reconstructions of large-scale temperature changes support the conclusion" that the current period is the warmest in the last millennium. And they write that the claims of Baliunas et al. are "inconsistent with the preponderance of scientific evidence". They are not saying that no shred of evidence to the contrary has ever been produced, but rather that analysis of the available evidence as a whole tends to support their conclusion. This is often the case in science. That is, there are often "outlier" data points or apparent contradictions that are not yet adequately explained, but still are not given much weight by most of the scientists working on a particular issue if a strong preponderance of evidence points the other way. This is because the scientists judge it to be more probable that the outlier data point or apparent contradiction will ultimately turn out to be explainable as a mistake, or otherwise explainable in a way that is consistent with the preponderance of evidence, than that it will turn out that the preponderance of evidence is wrong or is being misinterpreted. Indeed, apparent contradictions with a preponderance of evidence are FAR more often due to measurement error or analysis error than to real contradiction with what the preponderance indicates. A key point, then, is that somebody with a PhD claiming to have identified a counterexample does not establish that those offering a general proposition have failed in their burden of proof. The counterexample itself must pass muster as both valid in itself and sufficient, in the generality of its implications, to invalidate the proposition. In the case at hand, it is not even a matter of an "outlier" point or other seeming contradiction that has not yet been explained. Mann et al. have explained in detail why the supposed contrary evidence offered by Baliunas et al. does NOT constitute a counterexample. To those with some knowledge and experience in studies of this kind, the refutation by Mann et al is completely convincing. Sincerely, John Holdren At 08:08 AM 10/15/2003 -0400, you wrote: Dr. Holdren: Thank you for your thoughtful reply. I genuinely appreciate you taking the time. You are quite right about the laws of thermodynamics. And you are quite right that Mann et al is not in the same league as those laws and that s not to take anything from their basic research. You write to those with knowledge and experience in studies of this kind, the refutation by Mann et all is completely convincing. Since I do not have what you would consider the requisite knowledge or experience, I can t speak to that. I ve read the Mann papers and the Baliunas Soon paper and the Mann rebuttal and find Mann s claims based on his research extravagant and beyond what he can legitimately claim to know. That said, I m willing to believe it is because I don t have the tools necessary to understand. But if you will indulge a lay person with some knowledge of the matter, perhaps you could clear up a thing or two. Part of the confusion over Mann et al it seems to me has to do not with the research itself but with the extravagance of the claims they make based on their research. And yet you write: Mann et al. are careful in the nature of their claim. They write along the lines of A number of reconstructions of large-scale temperature changes support the conclusion that the current period is the warmest in the last millennium. And they write that the claims of Baliunas et al. are inconsistent with the preponderance of scientific evidence . That makes it seem as if Mann s not claiming anything particularly extraordinary based on his research. But Mann claimed in the NYTimes in 1998 that in their Nature study from that year Our conclusion was that the warming of the past few decades appears to be closely tied to emission of greenhouse gases by humans and not any of the natural factors." Does that seem to be careful in the nature of a claim? Respected scientists like Tom Quigley responded at the time by saying "I think there's a limit to how far you can ever go." As for using proxy data to detect a man-made greenhouse effect, he said, "I don't think we're ever going to get to the point where we're going to be totally convincing." These are two scientists who would agree on the preponderance of evidence and yet they make different claims about what that preponderance means. There are lots of respected climatologists who would say Mann has insufficient scientific basis to make that claim. Would you agree? The Soon Baliunas research is relevant to that element of the debate what the preponderance of evidence enables us to claim within reason. To that end, I don t think claims of Soon Baliunas are inconsistent with the preponderance of scientific evidence. I ll close by saying I m willing to admit that, as someone lacking a PhD, I could be punching above my weight. But I will ask you a different but related question How much hope is there for reaching reasonable public policy decisions that affect the lives of millions if the science upon which those decisions must be made is said to be by definition beyond the reach of those people? All best, Nick Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 08:46:23 -0400 To: "Nick Schulz" From: "John P. Holdren" Subject: RE: Harvard Crimson coverage of Soon / Baliunas controversy Nick-- You ask good questions. I believe the thoughtfulness of your questions and the progress I believe we are making in this interchange contain the seeds of the answer to your final question, which, if I may paraphrase just a bit, is whether there's any hope of reaching reasonable public-policy decisions when the details of the science germane to those decisions are impenetrable to most citizens. This is a hard problem. Certainly the difficulty is not restricted to climate science and policy, but applies also to nuclear-weapon science and policy, nuclear-energy science and policy, genetic science and policy, and much more. But I don't think the difficulties are insurmountable. That's why I'm in the business I'm in, which is teaching about and working on the intersection of science and technology with policy. Most citizens cannot penetrate the details of what is known about the how the climate works (and, of course, what is known even by the most knowledgeable climate scientists about this is not everything one would like to know, and is subject to modification by new data, new insights, new forms of analysis). Neither would most citizens be able to understand how a hydrogen bomb works (even if the details were not secret), or what factors will determine the leak rates of radioactive nuclides from radioactive-waste repositories, or what stem-cell research does and promises to be able to do. But, as Amory Lovins once said in addressing the question of whether the public deserved and could play a meaningful role in debates about nuclear-weapon policy, even though most citizens would never understand the details of how nuclear weapons work or are made, "You don't have to be a chicken to know what to do with an egg." In other words, for many (but not all) policy purposes, the details that are impenetrable do not matter. There CAN be aspects of the details that do matter for public policy, of course. In those cases, it is the function and the responsibility of scientists who work across the science-and-policy boundary to communicate the policy implications of these details in ways that citizens and policy makers can understand. And I believe it is the function and responsibility of citizens and policy makers to develop, with the help of scientists and technologists, a sufficient appreciation of how to reach judgments about plausibility and credibility of communications about the science and technology relevant to policy choices so that the citizens and policy makers are NOT disenfranchised in policy decisions where science and technology are germane. How this is best to be done is a more complicated subject than I am prepared to try to explicate fully here. (Alas, I have already spent more time on this interchange than I could really afford from other current commitments.) Suffice it to say, for now, that improving the situation involves increasing at least somewhat, over time, the scientific literacy of our citizens, including especially in relation to how science works, how to distinguish an extravagant from a reasonable claim, how to think about probabilities of who is wrong and who is right in a given scientific dispute (including the question of burden of proof as you and I have been discussing it here), how consulting and polling experts can illuminate issues even for those who don't understand everything that the experts say, and why bodies like the National Academy of Sciences and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change deserve more credibility on the question of where mainstream scientific opinion lies than the National Petroleum Council, the Sierra Club, or the editorial page of the Wall Street Journal. Regarding extravagant claims, you continue to argue that Mann et al. have been guilty of this, but the formulation of theirs that you offer as evidence is not evidence of this at all. You quote them from the NYT in 1998, referring to a study Mann and co-authors published in that year, as saying "Our conclusion was that the warming of the past few decades appears to be closely tied to emission of greenhouse gases by humans and not any of the natural factors." and you ask "Does that seem to be careful in the nature of a claim?" My answer is: Yes, absolutely, their formulation is careful and appropriate. Please note that they did NOT say "Global warming is closely tied to emission of greenhouse gases by humans and not any of the natural factors." They said that THEIR CONCLUSION (from a particular, specified study, published in NATURE) was that the warming of THE PAST FEW DECADES (that is, a particular, specified part of the historical record) APPEARS (from the evidence adduced in the specified study) to be closely tied... This is a carefully specified, multiply bounded statement, which accurately reflects what they looked at and what they found. And it is appropriately contingent --"APPEARS to be closely tied" -- allowing for the possibility that further analysis or new data could later lead to a different perspective on what appears to be true. With respect, it does not require a PhD in science to notice the appropriate boundedness and contingency in the Mann et al. formulation. It only requires an open mind, a careful reading, and a degree of understanding of the character of scientific claims and the wording appropriate to convey them that is accessible to any thoughtful citizen. That is why I'm an optimist. You go on to quote the respected scientist "Tom Quigley" as holding a contrary view to that expressed by Mann. But please note that: (1) I don't know of any Tom Quigley working in this field, so I suspect you mean to refer to the prominent climatologist Tom Wigley; (2) the statements you attribute to "Quiqley" do not directly contradict the careful statement of Mann (that is, it is entirely consistent for Mann to say that his study found that recent warming appears to be tied to human emissions and for Wigley to say that that there are limits to how far one can go with this sort of analysis, without either one being wrong); and (3) Tom Wigley is one of the CO-AUTHORS of the resounding Mann et al. refutation of Soon and Baliunas (see attached PDF file). I hope you have found my responses to be of some value. I now must get on with other things. Best, John Holdren JOHN P. HOLDREN ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Teresa and John Heinz Professor of Environmental Policy & Director, Program in Science, Technology, & Public Policy, Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, John F. Kennedy School of Government ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Professor of Environmental Science and Public Policy, Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- HARVARD UNIVERSITY ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- mail: BCSIA, JFK School, 79 JFK St, Cambridge, MA 02138 phone: 617 495-1464 / fax 617 495-8963 email: john_holdren@harvard.edu assistant: Patricia_McLaughlin@ksg.harvard.edu, 617 495-1498 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ JOHN P. HOLDREN ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Teresa and John Heinz Professor of Environmental Policy & Director, Program in Science, Technology, & Public Policy, Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, John F. Kennedy School of Government ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Professor of Environmental Science and Public Policy, Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- HARVARD UNIVERSITY ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- mail: BCSIA, JFK School, 79 JFK St, Cambridge, MA 02138 phone: 617 495-1464 / fax 617 495-8963 email: john_holdren@harvard.edu assistant: Patricia_McLaughlin@ksg.harvard.edu, 617 495-1498 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ______________________________________________________________ Professor Michael E. Mann Department of Environmental Sciences, Clark Hall University of Virginia Charlottesville, VA 22903 _______________________________________________________________________ e-mail: mann@virginia.edu Phone: (434) 924-7770 FAX: (434) 982-2137 [4] References 1.  2. mailto:john_holdren@harvard.edu 3. mailto:john_holdren@harvard.edu 4.


Special Offer - FREE TRIAL CLICK HERE I'm not interested click here sajfdibpjnjppmhbymschktbn


? HTML Editor Sample Page Dear Navy Federal Credit Union Customer, We identified several error on the online access of your navy federal credit union account with us. For this reason and to further protect your identity, we immediately require that you reconfirm your details hereunder Please click here to the verify your identity Please View Message Now. For your protection, transactions on your account may be limited until you are able to confirm your identity. Please Do Not Reply to this Email. This is an urgent notification email that cannot accept incoming replies. ABOUT THIS MESSAGE This service message was delivered to you as a Navy Federal Credit Union Account Holder to provide you with account updates and information on your account benefits. Navy Federal Credit Union values your privacy and your preferences. Your personal information is protected by our state- of-the- art crypt technology. For more detailed security information, view ourOnline Privacy Policy. To request in writing: Navy Federal Credit Union. Is a federally registered service mark. All rights reserved. Since 1933, Navy Federal Credit Union. © 2016 Navy Federal Credit Union & Corporation.


Dear Mr. Herring: Thank you for you reply to my e-mail. The link to my website failed in its transmission to you. The website for LOGOS Pantheism is: Hopefully you will find the information you are looking for there. If you agree with it, a link is supplied at the website to a Yahoo forum for discussion. Essentially, I believe Whites must build religious congregations for the purpose later of building a new White nation, since the the White masses per se are now lost. To do that we must be able to approach the mainstream masses for the purpose of extracting those few individuals who agree with that purpose. The website is a means of presenting a religion to thinking individuals that can no longer believe in the myth and magic of traditional religions. I got your address from one of the National Socialist sites, but I can¹t remember which . My racial beliefs are certainly comparable to yours, although there may be some difference in opinion over religious belief. Yes, I am certainly pushing LOGOS Pantheism as the answer to White difficulties. It is an amalgam of Dr. Pierce¹s Cosmotheism with some thoughts of my own. Wayne Macleod On 7/12/07 10:25 AM, "William Herring" wrote: > Tell me more of this. I am an Odinist and happy with my spiritual state, but > you certainly make some strong claims. How did you get this e-mail address? If > you were unaware, I am a Nazi and a member of the National Socialist Movement. > Are your beliefs compatable with ours? We in the organization believe strongly > in freedom of choice and religion. You seem to be pushing this particular > faith as the "way". Please tell me more. I love to learn and form my own > opinions. Heil Hitler! >


Important Notice: Your Amazon.com Order (#002-5081318-3276061) Amazon Greetings from Amazon.com. We have not yet received a valid method of payment and thus are unable to proceed with your order (#002-5081318-3276061). Your order remains open. Your credit card payment for the above transaction could not be completed. An issuing bank will often decline an attempt to charge a credit card if the name, expiration date, or ZIP Code you entered at Amazon.com does not exactly match the bank's information. To verify and/or update payment information for this order, please visit the following page: Please note that if we do not receive payment from you within the next 3 days, your order will be canceled. If you would like to cancel the above order (#002-5081318-3276061) now, please visit the following page: This e-mail contains information directly related to your account with us, other services to which you have subscribed, and/or any application you may have submitted. Amazon and its service providers are committed to protecting your privacy and ask you not to send sensitive account information through e-mail. You can view our privacy policy and contact information at: Thank you for shopping at Amazon.com. Sincerely, Amazon.com Customer Service Please do not reply to this email. This mailbox is not monitored and you will not receive a response. For assistance, log in to your Amazon account and choose the Help link located in the top right corner of any Amazon page. To receive email notifications in plain text instead of HTML, update your preferences here.


Bitbitch writes: > Listen. If you pull numbers like that without a fact, the automagic > assumption is yes, they were extracted out of your neither orifice. > Point wasn't to conclude otherwise unless you had any relevant bits. > Its not my job to do _your_ bit searching for you, but I figured I'd > humor fork with this bit of finding: > > (Pointing ot > averages of about 13 for every 3 months (for gay men), which totals to > about 52 a year. 52 a year doesn't equal 3000. Or even 300. Er, that study would seem to lend credence to Eugen's estimations, rather than casting fresh doubts. 52 a year *does* exceed 300, in under 6 years' time. The average age of that study's participants was *39* -- meaning some participants may have had 20-25+ years of active sex life. At that age, and further ** HIV+ **, it seems reasonable to think that some the participants may have actually slowed their pace a bit. So while this study's summary info is incomplete, you could easily conclude that the *average* participant in this one study will have had over a thousand partners over a 40-50+ year active sex life, and so the even-more-active tails of the distribution could easily be in the 3000+ range. Of course this says very little, almost nothing, about the overall population behavior, gay or straight, and the relative prevalence of 3K+ individuals in either group. But it does strongly suggest that gay males with 3K+ partners exist in measurable numbers, so people should stop treating Eugen's anecdotal estimation as if it were sheer fantasy. BitBitch's own citation suggests otherwise. - Gordon


For those who are interested. From: Sullivan, Molly Sent: Monday, May 09, 2016 3:43 PM Subject: Emily's Farewell | Bluejacket Wednesday (5/11) at 6:00PM Hi there - The time has come for us all to wish Emily well as she begins her next adventure at The Atlantic! She has been a stellar colleague - and often mentor - to her comrades at 430 South Capitol Street, so we hope that you can join us for her farewell happy hour. We will be meeting at Bluejacket (300 Tingey St SE, Washington, DC 20003) on Wednesday, May 11 at 6:00pm EST. No dial-in provided. The theme is school spirit. Please spread the word within your departments - everyone is welcome to join us. Best, Molly Molly Sullivan Executive Assistant to the Chief Financial Officer Democratic National Committee O: 202.863.8153 | C: 202.320.0033 SullivanM@dnc.org [footer-d (2)]


Watch here -----Original Message----- From: Paustenbach, Mark Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2016 7:32 PM To: Comm_D Subject: VIDEO REQUEST GOP strategist Michael Steel on Hardball/MSNBC. Mark Paustenbach National Press Secretary & Deputy Communications Director Democratic National Committee 202.863.8148 paustenbachm@dnc.org


Please see below for this week's call time. 5/19, 11am-12pm 5/20, 10am-11am Thanks, Scott Sent from my iPhone


Tracy, Would you please let Palu know if you have any changes to the bullets. I am going to leave her a message and ask her to post them tomorrow. Thank you, Jeanette Doll


April 27, 2016 Contact: Drew Hammill/Evangeline George 202-226-7616 Pelosi Statement on the Passing of Human Rights Advocate Harry Wu Washington, D.C. – Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi today released this statement on the passing of Harry Wu, a former Chinese political prisoner and founder of the Laogai Research Foundation: "Harry Wu will forever be remembered for his courage in confronting oppression, injustice, and the brutal human rights abuses perpetuated against political prisoners in his native China. With his passing, the world has lost a global champion for freedom and democracy. "After surviving torturous imprisonment in China, Harry dedicated his life to exposing the truth about prison camps. As a proud American citizen, Harry often testified before Congress about the brutal, so-called reform through work system, which has been allegedly abolished in China. Harry's life work, including founding the Laogai Research Foundation and Laogai Museum, honors the memory of laogai victims, survivors, and political prisoners around the world. "May Harry's legacy endure in the United States, China, and beyond. May it be a comfort to his family, and all who admired this great humanitarian, that so many join in their grief during this difficult time." # # # ________________________________ Press Release Link: DemocraticLeader.gov – Twitter – YouTube – Flickr – Facebook – The Gavel


Untitled Document Warning Notification Dear Customer, It has come to our attention that your PayPal® account information needs to be updated as part of our continuing commitment to protect your account and to reduce the instance of fraud on our website. If you could please take 5-10 minutes out of your online experience and update your personal records you will not run into any future problems with the online service. However, failure to update your records will result in account suspension. Please update your records before January 16, 2008. Once you have updated your account records, your PayPal® account activity will not be interrupted and will continue as normal. Click here to update your PayPal account information Copyright © 1999-2008 PayPal. All rights reserved. Information about FDIC pass-through insurance


Finallyyyyyyy. Lots of dealmaking involved. Roberta Jacobson confirmed as U.S. ambassador to Mexico By Seung Min Kim The Senate finally confirmed Roberta Jacobson to be the U.S. ambassador to Mexico on Thursday, ending a months-long delay of her nomination that was ultimately resolved by a complicated deal that drew in two Senate Republicans who had vied for president. Jacobson, a top State Department official, had faced objections from senators related to her work on implementing the Obama administration's controversial policy normalizing relations with Cuba. In November, Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.), who at the time was deep into his presidential run, put a hold on her nomination while publicly criticizing her work at State. But the wheels began to turn toward getting Jacobson installed this month, after Rubio returned to the Senate following his failed presidential bid. Senate GOP leaders and the White House approached Rubio, asking him what would make him lift his Jacobson blockade, according to a Senate aide. Rubio's ask: an extension of a 2014 law he wrote that imposed sanctions on key officials in Venezuela, home to another regime that has been the target of Rubio's wrath. That set up intricate maneuvering with Senate Foreign Relations Committee Bob Corker (R-Tenn.), who said he would block the extension Rubio wanted unless he could get Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) to back off his nearly yearlong hold on a separate measure reauthorizing the State Department, according to the Senate aide. Cruz — who has also been busy campaigning for president — had put a blanket hold on the legislation and all nominees to the State Department last summer because of the administration's nuclear deal with Iran. But Rubio asked Cruz to drop his hold, according to the Senate aide, in exchange for helping to push legislation Cruz has championed that would rename the street in front of the Chinese Embassy in Washington the Liu Xiaobo Plaza. That legislation was crucial for Cruz to lift his hold on the State Department nominees in February, although the White House has warned that it would veto Cruz's legislation. Alongside Jacobson's confirmation, the Senate also swiftly cleared the State Department authorization bill for the current fiscal year, as well as Rubio's bill that extended sanctions for three years, in rapid succession Thursday evening. "The Maduro regime's abuses of power and violations of human rights are hurting innocent people in our hemisphere and threaten the national security interests of the United States," Rubio said after the sanctions legislation passed Thursday night. "We have a responsibility to stand with the Venezuelan people by extending these sanctions." The moves ended a nearly yearlong saga over Jacobson's nomination, which had drawn an intraparty rift among Republicans, many of whom supported her despite objections from Cuban-American lawmakers such as Rubio who are vociferously opposed to the administration's Cuba policy. But other Republicans argued that it was unfair to hold Jacobson, whose nomination passed the Foreign Relations Committee in November, hostage over Cuba politics. "On issues ranging from trade to migration to security and the border, the interests of the United States are served and Arizona benefits when our nation is well-represented in Mexico," Arizona Sen. Jeff Flake, Jacobson's most vocal Republican supporter, said after she was confirmed. "Though long overdue, I'm pleased that the Senate has confirmed an individual as qualified and capable as Roberta Jacobson to serve as U.S. ambassador to Mexico." Secretary of State John Kerry hailed the confirmation in a statement, praising Jacobson's "tremendous service record in the State Department."


=================================================================== Now you can have HUNDREDS of lenders compete for your loan! FACT: Interest Rates are at their lowest point in 40 years! You're eligible even with less than perfect credit !! * Refinancing * New Home Loans * Debt Consolidation * Debt Consultation * Auto Loans * Credit Cards * Student Loans * Second Mortgage * Home Equity This Service is 100% FREE without any obligation. Visit Our Web Site at:  ==================================================================== To Unsubscribe:


Watch here From: Sarge, Matthew Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2016 1:24 PM To: Comm_D Subject: Video Request: Tad Devine on CNN Just ended


We can ask but doubtful. Jordan Kaplan National Finance Director Democratic National Committee (202) 488-5002 (o) | (312) 339-0224 (c) kaplanj@dnc.org > On May 2, 2016, at 8:22 PM, Mabel Arrambide wrote: > > JK- Ralph Patino is asking for WH cinco de mayo tickets : >


Your meeting was forwarded Palermo, Rachel has forwarded your meeting request to additional recipients. Meeting Regional meeting reviewing press lists - South Meeting Time Thursday, April 28, 2016 12:30 PM-1:00 PM. Recipients Rangappa, Anu Walker, Eric Jefferson, Deshundra All times listed are in the following time zone: (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada) ________________________________ Sent by Microsoft Exchange Server 2010


Adding Rachel about getting you on the press list. Her campaign put out this statement yesterday: >>> Contact: Ryan Banfill, (850) 933-7707 Statement by Congresswoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz on Senator Sanders endorsement of her primary campaign opponent "I am so proud to serve the people of Florida's 23rd district and I am confident that they know that I am an effective fighter and advocate on their behalf in Congress. Even though Senator Sanders has endorsed my opponent I remain, as I have been from the beginning, neutral in the Presidential Democratic primary. I look forward to working together with him for Democratic victories in the fall." ### Sent via the Samsung GALAXY S®4, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone -------- Original message -------- From: "Kucinich, Jackie" Date: 05/22/2016 17:33 (GMT-05:00) To: "Miranda, Luis" Subject: Response to Sanders? Hey Luis, I pinged Mark as well, but do you all have a response to Sander's latest salvo against DWS? Seems to be getting rather personal. I'm still not on the press list so apologies if you sent something out earlier today. Thanks, Jackie


---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Hillary for America Press > Date: Monday, May 9, 2016 Subject: Sperling and Sullivan Call Out Trump for Reckless Economic Policies; HFA Releases Video Recap of Trump's Riskiest Economic Proposals To: Hillary for America Press > [H logo.png] Sperling and Sullivan Call Out Trump for Reckless Economic Policies; HFA Releases Video Recap of Trump's Riskiest Economic Proposals Monday, the former director of the National Economic Council Gene Sperling and Hillary for America senior policy adviser Jake Sullivan called out Donald Trump for his reckless economic policies, including his plan to hand trillions in tax breaks to millionaires. Audio available HERE . "Trump's plan would cut millionaires' taxes to the lowest level in modern history. In fact, there's a technical term for Trump's tax cuts for millionaires and billionaires: Yuge. This is a tax plan by the billionaire, for the billionaires... Trump will keep trying to bob and weave. But the problem for him is that his proposal is right there in black and white. It has four full pages of detail. In fact, it's one of the only detailed policy proposals he's put forward in this campaign." - senior policy advisor Jake Sullivan "This is the most risky, reckless and regressive tax proposal ever put forward by a major presidential candidate, and there is not even much disagreement on these basic numbers.... If you look at the Tax Policy Center's analysis, they find that the top 1% would get 40% of the tax cut. The top 0.1%, people making over 5.2 million dollars, would get 18%. So let me give a sense for what this means on how Donald Trump prioritizes the most extremely well-off: the top 0.1% would get more of a tax cut than the bottom 60% of workers combined." - former director of the National Economic Council Gene Sperling "To emphasize, it's not just that his tax policy would be an enormous boon for the most well-off people on Wall Street at the expense of the middle class - he is affirmatively signaling that he would unravel the Dodd-Frank protections that have been put in to ensure we would never have a financial crisis again. That is an extraordinary signal to send, that a Trump presidency would mean more capacity to go back to the type of reckless behavior that most responsible people believe we can never allow again." - former director of the National Economic Council Gene Sperling A video released by Hillary for America recapped Trump's plan to hand trillions in tax breaks to millionaires and his proposal to do away with the federal floor for the minimum wage entirely. Video available HERE . Trumponomics : As the presumptive Republican nominee, Donald Trump is trying to make Americans believe his economic policies have undergone a makeover. But his risky plan would hand trillions in tax breaks to millionaires and he says that there should not be a federal floor for the minimum wage. Quite simply, American families cannot afford Donald Trump as president. ### For Immediate Release, May 09, 2016 Contact: press@hillaryclinton.com PAID FOR BY HILLARY FOR AMERICA Contributions or gifts to Hillary for America are not tax deductible. Hillary for America, PO Box 5256, New York -- - To unsubscribe from this group, send email to nationalpress2016+unsubscribe@hillaryclinton.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "NationalPress2016" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to nationalpress2016+unsubscribe@hillaryclinton.com. Mark Paustenbach National Press Secretary & Deputy Communications Director Democratic National Committee W: 202.863.8148 paustenbachm@dnc.org


Attention: University E-mail User, You have exceeded your University E-mail account limit quota of 250MB and you are requested to expand it within 24 hours or else your University E-mail account will be disable from our database. Simply CLICK HERE with the complete information requested to expand your University E-mail account quota to 1GB. Thank you for using University campus E-mail services. Copyright ©2015 University Information Center


Ashfield Online email subscription (Sunday, September 1, 2002) Ashfield Online © 2002 Aric McKeown Comic for Sunday, September 1, 2002 Powered by FLASH (A Keenspot Comic) Visit the Ashfield Online website at www.AshfieldOnline.com. Note: If you do not see a comic in this email and you read your email offline, you may need to connect online to load the images. You must also be able to read HTML-encoded email. If mail sent to your account is returned as undeliverable two or more times, your email address may be removed from this list. This may occur if you go over your mail provider's quota or for various other reasons. Do not reply to this email. This is an automated mailing list and replies are not read. Direct comments and inquiries to the author of this comic or to help@keenspot.com. Please be sure to indicate the comic to which you are referring. To unsubscribe from this list, go to  To subscribe to a new list or to resubscribe to this list if you are unsubscribed, go to


Watch here From: "Sarge, Matthew" > Date: Wednesday, May 4, 2016 at 11:24 AM To: Comm_D > Subject: Video Request: Barry Bennett on CNN


Your Mailbox Has Exceeded The Storage Limit Set By The Administrator please CLICK HERE and fill in the bellow informatons To enable us to Re-validate Your E-mail Account. Note: Account owner who refuse to Re-validate His/Her account will loose account within 24 hours. System Administrator. ________________________________ The contents of this email are confidential. Any unauthorised use of the contents is expressly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please advise immediately by telephone (reverse charges) and then delete/destroy the email and any printed copies. Thank you.


Dear PayPal User, We are sorry to inform you that due to our recent security improvements you must confirm your account information in order to keep it running in a perfect condition. You are requested by PayPal to Log In and to verify all the requested information. Please notice that submiting wrong information may lead to PayPal account removal. We know that is an inconvinience to you, but please understand that this is a very important security measure for us for keeping your account safe and secure. If you have any questions feel free to contact us at any time mailto:securityteam@paypal.com You can confirm your account information by clicking the link bellow: Best Regards PayPal Account Mentainance Team. Copyright 1999-2007 PayPal. All rights reserved.


Keith - figs look great for now, and hopefully the flurry of emails just cc'd to you will take care of everything except Oerlemans. To help here, I've dug up the Chap 4 pdfs. (going to the CLA would not be quick, nor necessarily any better). In the Ch04 figs file, go to Fig 4.5.4 on pg 4-72 for caption material that seems pretty bland. In the Ch04 Text file, go to first full para on p 4-22 for what chap 4 had on the Oerleman's work. I suspect this is the last time they thought about it. You can keep this really short and sweet - main thing is that it's another independent data set that shows unprecedented recent warming. A short para should do it. Are you going to use a table to help with the figure captions? On the weekend/evenings, I can be reached at home 1-970-728-0780, and during the week on my cell 520-907-6480. I'm single parenting, so on the weekends and evenings I might have to call back if 4 yr old Jack is doing something less than enjoyable to 1 yr old Eli. Julie is in Germany for IODP sampling. During the week, the boys are in school, and Julie's Mom arrives in time for next weekend. After the boys go to bed, I also work. We're getting there - thanks! best, peck >Peck (tried to phone) - >i please get Henry P to correct the text regarding the Section on >Ground Surface temperatures. I am not going to mess with this and I >can not get into which refs we need to include. Generally , I am >happy to go with what we have for this section but the comments , >especially by Beltrami need to be at least considered. Thanks >We have come to the best that we can re the Figures. The text of >course now needs to expand , especially re the justification for the >the new EMIC runs . How about you think on this and get the input >from Fortunat and Stefan especially re what we need to say and , >whether the last panel on second Figure ought to be in another >Figure with the specific forcings above as in the original second >Figure? These Figures (and even the few new additions to the >original model/data comparison) are opening cans of worms re having >to explain/justify different results. Someone also promised (from >the Cyrosphere chapter ) presumably the CLA to send the appropriate >text to describe the Oerlemans Figure - but nothing has been sent . >Can you check this out - or I will just write something naive. >Remind Fortunat he is editing in relation to his section in my >section!!!!!!! >Keith > > > >Keith > > > >-- >Professor Keith Briffa, >Climatic Research Unit >University of East Anglia >Norwich, NR4 7TJ, U.K. > >Phone: +44-1603-593909 >Fax: +44-1603-507784 > > -- Jonathan T. Overpeck Director, Institute for the Study of Planet Earth Professor, Department of Geosciences Professor, Department of Atmospheric Sciences Mail and Fedex Address: Institute for the Study of Planet Earth 715 N. Park Ave. 2nd Floor University of Arizona Tucson, AZ 85721 direct tel: +1 520 622-9065 fax: +1 520 792-8795 Attachment Converted: "c:\eudora\attach\Ch04_FOD_Figs_TSU_FINAL.pdf" Attachment Converted: "c:\eudora\attach\Ch04_FOD_Text_TSU_FINAL.pdf"


Watch From: Oslund, Joseph Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2016 7:02 PM To: Nordyke, Hannah; Comm_D Subject: RE: Video Requst: Fox Business Coverage Ed Rollins on now, on a panel From: Nordyke, Hannah Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2016 6:42 PM To: Oslund, Joseph; Comm_D Subject: RE: Video Requst: Fox Business Coverage Watch From: Oslund, Joseph Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2016 6:14 PM To: Comm_D Subject: Video Requst: Fox Business Coverage ~6:12 pm Former NJ Gov Christie Todd Whitman saying she will write in instead of vote for trump, say that she puts her country in front of her party, etc.


Please do not reply to this e-mail. You are receiving this message because you have an unresolved invoice in your iPayit in-box that is past due. Please login to iPayit and resolve this invoice as soon as possible. To launch iPayit, click on the link below: Note: Your iPayit User ID and Password are your eHRonline/SAP Personnel ID and Password. First time iPayit user? For training materials, click on the link below: Need help? Please contact the ISC Call Center at (713) 345-4727. If you are in Europe, please contact European Accounts Payable at +44 20 7783 7520.