reapxdev/zenodo-scraper huggingface dataset:
Market Integration Pathways for Enhanced Geothermal Systems in Europe
Authors: Franken, Lukas, Zeyen, Elisabeth, Angelidis, Orestis, Brown, Thomas, Friedrich, Daniel
Type: Data paper
Published: 2026-08-03

<p>Complete Code and Data to reproduce the results or plots in the <a href="https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.06600">paper</a>.</p>
<p> </p>
Belonging and Exclusion: Modeling the Affective Logic of Ingroup Cohesion
Authors: Kleden, Alan
Type: Preprint
Published: 2026-08-03
Keywords: Axiodynamics, Axiological distance, Oriented divergence, Inhibitory appraisal, Exodefavoritism, Endofavoritism, Axiotype, Telos, Negentropic regulation, Circular moments, Coupled dynamics, Symbolic exclusion, Diversity, Social cohesion, Polarization modeling

<p class="MsoNormal"><span>This article presents a formal affective-cognitive model of group cohesion and symbolic exclusion, in which endofavoritism and exodefavoritism are theorized not merely as cognitive biases, but also as candidate regulatory mechanisms through which groups maintain or reconstitute affective coherence under divergence.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span>The formalization rests on a distinction between the <em>magnitude</em> of axiological divergence and the <em>register</em> in which it is appraised. Structural divergence between axiotypes is symmetric, and so is the norm of the oriented axiological distance that carries it; the asymmetry resides in that distance's orientation within the orthogonal conative–inhibitory plane. Boundary activation is accordingly driven by the projection onto the inhibitory axis rather than by magnitude, so that two groups standing at identical structural distance may appraise one another differently, and a large divergence appraised in a predominantly conative register does not activate exclusion at all.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span>Group-level coherence is characterized through the first two circular moments of the force directions relative to an effective telos. These separate directional alignment from axial concentration, and distinguish angular dispersion, polarized ambivalence, and coherent counter-orientation — configurations that a mean-cosine index conflates. Cohesion and exclusion are then coupled through a differential system written in gain–loss form, for which forward invariance of the admissible state space is established analytically and verified numerically, together with a bounded affective modulation and a telos-referenced loss-asymmetry operator. The passage from dyadic quantities to group-level dynamics is effected by a reduced aggregate closure whose approximations and architectural limit are stated explicitly and tested.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span>An illustrative scenario applies the system to the pattern reported in the diversity–trust literature, in which rising perceived heterogeneity coincides with weakened internal cohesion and strengthened boundaries.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><strong><span>Status.</span></strong><span> This preprint presents a theoretical and computational proposal. Parameters are stipulated rather than empirically calibrated; the simulations are illustrative and operate at the reduced aggregate level, with no agent network instantiated; predictive validation has not been performed.</span></p>