reapxdev/zenodo-scraper huggingface dataset:
Habeastrum decussatum Hausdorf & Tapia 2026, sp. nov.
Authors: Hausdorf, Bernhard, Roosen, Marijn T., Tapia, Elicio
Type: Taxonomic treatment
Published: 2026-08-03
Keywords: Biodiversity, Taxonomy, Animalia, Mollusca, Gastropoda, Architaenioglossa, Diplommatinidae, Habeastrum, Habeastrum decussatum

<p><i>Habeastrum decussatum</i> Hausdorf & Tapia sp. nov.</p><p>Fig. 1 M – R, Tables 1, 2</p><p><b>Type material.</b></p><p><i>Holotype</i>: Ecuador, Sucumbios province: • Lumbaqui, via la Troncal km 12, sector Dumbique, Dashino River, in leaf litter at base of non-calcareous rocky wall in a small river cliff, 0.0364°S, 77.2997°W, 500 m a. s. l., 22. 07. 2025, E. Tapia & A. Guasti leg., QCAZI 282661. <i>Paratypes</i>: • same data as holotype: QCAZI 282662 / 1; ZMH -MOL-165491 / 2.</p><p><b>Diagnosis.</b></p><p>Shell minute (1.3 mm high), corneous-brown, wide, elongated conical, with 4.5 strongly convex whorls, protoconch (2 whorls) with dense, irregular indentations, teleoconch with fine ribs (24–25 ribs / 0.5 mm) crossed by spiral lines, and a narrow umbilicus taking 8–10 % of the shell diameter.</p><p><b>Description.</b></p><p>Shell elongated conical; 4.5 strongly convex whorls; protoconch (c. 2 whorls) with dense, irregular indentations; teleoconch finely ribbed (24–25 ribs / 0.5 mm on ventral side of body whorl) crossed by distinct spiral lines; corneous-brown; aperture circular, prosocline; peristome continuous, attached to body whorl, not expanded, not reflexed and hardly thickened on the inside; umbilicus open, narrow, taking 8–10 % of shell diameter. Measurements see Table 2.</p><p><b>Etymology.</b></p><p>Named after the decussate sculpture consisting of fine radial ribs crossed by spiral lines (Latin decussatus, marked with lines intersecting cross-wise, used as an adjective).</p><p><b>Distribution.</b></p><p><i>Habeastrum decussatum</i> sp. nov. is only known from piedmont evergreen forest in the north of the Eastern Cordillera in Sucumbios province in Ecuador at 500 m a. s. l.</p><p><b>Remarks.</b></p><p><i>Habeastrum decussatum</i> sp. nov. differs from all other <i>Habeastrum</i> species in the wide conical shell with fine radial ribs crossed by distinct spiral lines on the teleoconch, and distinct irregular indentations on the protoconch (Table 2).</p>
Spelaeometra D. Polhemus & Ferreira 2018
Authors: Serafim, Ingrid R., Santos, Júlio C. C. V., Ferreira, Rodrigo L.
Type: Taxonomic treatment
Published: 2026-07-20
Keywords: Biodiversity, Taxonomy, Animalia, Arthropoda, Insecta, Hemiptera, Hydrometridae, Spelaeometra

<p><b>Key to species of Spelaeometra D. Polhemus & Ferreira, 2018</b></p><p>1. Body length approximately 2.56 mm (median); eyes with 16 ommatidia; antennae not exceeding body length; paramere with a long ventroapical process, hook-shaped, extending to about half the length of the distal arm ..................................... <i>Spelaeometra ybykoara</i> Serafim & Ferreira sp. nov.</p><p>– Eyes with fewer than 16 ommatidia; antennae usually exceeding body length; paramere with ventroapical process short or not strongly elongate .......................................................................... 2</p><p>2. Body length approx. 2.85 mm; eyes with about 7 ommatidia; antennal segments I and II subequal in length; gular lobe reduced, not covering any labial segment; paramere with a narrower hook-like apex...................................................................... <i>Spelaeometra hypogea</i> Cordeiro & Moreira, 2018</p><p>– Eyes with 8–12 ommatidia; antennal segments variable; gular lobe covering labial segment I or not evident; paramere with subtriangular apex or short hook ................................................................. 3</p><p>3. Body length approx. 2.39 mm; eyes with 10–12 ommatidia; paramere with short ventroapical process, hook-shaped; ventrolateral margin strongly angled ............................................................................ ................................................................................... <i>Spelaeometra iuiu</i> Serafim & Ferreira sp. nov.</p><p>– Body length approx. 2.50 mm; eyes with about 8 ommatidia; gular lobe covering labial segment I; paramere with subtriangular apex, not forming an elongate hook; dorsal margin of distal arm straight ............................................................... <i>Spelaeometra gruta</i> D. Polhemus & Ferreira, 2018</p>
Leptinaria unilamellata
Authors: Salvador, Rodrigo B., Ferreira-Santos, Laura, Cavallari, Daniel C., Gallão, Jonas E., Bichuette, Maria E.
Type: Taxonomic treatment
Published: 2026-08-03
Keywords: Biodiversity, Taxonomy, Animalia, Mollusca, Gastropoda, Stylommatophora, Achatinidae, Leptinaria, Leptinaria unilamellata

<p><i>Leptinaria unilamellata</i> (d’Orbigny, 1838)</p><p>Fig. 3 F</p><p><i>Leptinaria lamellata</i>: Morretes 1959: 132; Salgado and Coelho 2003: 155; Simone 2006: 186, fig. 678; Salvador et al. 2021: 5.</p><p><i>Leptinaria unilamelata</i> [sic]: Oliveira et al. 1981: 327.</p><p><i>Leptinaria unilamellata</i>: Simone 2006: 186, fig. 684; Breure et al. 2016: 35, tab. 3, fig. 14; Alexandre et al. 2017: 34, tabs 1–2, fig. 2 K; Breure et al. 2020: 27, figs 1–5 [see this article for full synonymy]; Lima et al. 2021: 274, fig. 3 T – V; Rangel et al. 2021: 4, tab. 1, fig. 2 b; Silva et al. 2021: 48, fig. 4 G, H; Salvador et al. 2024: 151.</p><p><b>Material examined.</b></p><p>LES 0031620, LES 0031621, LES 0031623 (Canaã dos Carajás, cave SB_0049; JE Gallão, JS Gallo, DF Torres & VF Sperandei leg., 16. ii. 2022) • LES 0031629 (Parauapebas, cave N 3_0026; JE Gallão, JS Gallo, DF Torres & VF Sperandei leg., 18. ii. 2022) • LES 0031643 (Parauapebas, cave N 3_0026; JE Gallão, TS Gallo, DF Torres & JEM Santos leg., 16. viii. 2022) • LES 0031655 (Canaã dos Carajás, cave SB_0049; JE Gallão & DB Ribeiro leg., 04. iv. 2023) • LES 0031657 (Canaã dos Carajás, cave SB_0094; JE Gallão & DB Ribeiro leg., 06. iv. 2023) • LES 0031648, LES 0031650 (Canaã dos Carajás, cave SB_0049; JE Gallão & DB Ribeiro leg., 12. iv. 2023) • LES 0031648 (Canaã dos Carajás, cave SB_0051; JE Gallão & DB Ribeiro leg., 12. iv. 2023).</p><p><b>GenBank acc. nr.</b></p><p>PZ 574924 (16 S), PZ 577563 (ITS 2 + 28 S) (LES 0031650).</p><p><b>Identification.</b></p><p><i>Leptinaria unilamellata</i> is a very widespread species in the Neotropics, characterised by the single lamella that gives it its name, and known from both natural and anthropically disturbed areas. It is thought to represent a species complex, but genetic and morphometric studies would be required to clarify that. In any case, the species shows conchological variation, with most shells being smooth, while axially ribbed specimens are uncommon but well known. These two shell morphs are known to occur in the same place in southeastern Brazil (DCC, pers. obs.), and both were found in the present material.</p><p><b>Distribution.</b></p><p>Nicaragua to southern Brazil (Simone 2006; Delannoye et al. 2015; Silva et al. 2021).</p><p><b>Remarks.</b></p><p>In the studied cave, <i>Leptinaria unilamellata</i> was found in the aphotic zone. Individuals were found under rocks on humid unconsolidated substrate, among roots, or on bat guano (mixed guano of frugivorous and insectivorous bats). This species has also been recorded in anthropically disturbed areas in the nearby municipality of Parauapebas in Pará (Paulo Ricardo S. Coelho, pers. comm., species identity confirmed via photographs).</p>
Dysopeas undetermined
Authors: Salvador, Rodrigo B., Ferreira-Santos, Laura, Cavallari, Daniel C., Gallão, Jonas E., Bichuette, Maria E.
Type: Taxonomic treatment
Published: 2026-08-03
Keywords: Biodiversity, Taxonomy, Animalia, Mollusca, Gastropoda, Stylommatophora, Achatinidae, Dysopeas, Dysopeas undetermined

<p><i>Dysopeas</i> sp.</p><p>Fig. 3 D</p><p><b>Material examined.</b></p><p>LES 0031639, LES 0031637, LES 0031641 (Parauapebas, cave N 3_0003; JE Gallão, TS Gallo, DF Torres & JEM Santos leg., 13. viii. 2022).</p><p><b>GenBank acc. nr.</b></p><p>PZ 576039 (COI), PZ 574756 (16 S), PZ 577561 (ITS 2 + 28 S) (LES 0031639).</p><p><b>Identification.</b></p><p>The shells of the present specimens are consistent with the genus <i>Dysopeas</i>, distributed from Nicaragua to southeastern Brazil (Simone 2006; López et al. 2015). In particular, although faint, the protoconch sculpture supports assignment to this genus: axial riblets on the apical-most area of the whorl (near the suture) and spiral lines on the remainder of the shell surface, continuing into the transition to the teleoconch after the axial teleoconch ribbing begins (Baker 1927; López et al. 2015). The overall shell shape and ribbing pattern do not fully match those of other species in Brazil and Venezuela; thus, the present specimens may represent a new species. However, considering that the specimens are juveniles, this cannot be confirmed at present.</p><p>Notably, the COI marker of the present specimen shows only 80.0–81.5 % identity with the available sequences of <i>Dysopeas muibum</i> (Marcus & Marcus, 1968) from Rio de Janeiro (Fernandes et al. 2026), which is currently the only member of the genus recorded from Brazil (Salvador et al. 2024).</p><p><b>Remarks.</b></p><p>The specimens were found in the entrance and twilight zones of a single cave, located either under rocks on unconsolidated humid substrate or on guano of frugivorous and nectarivorous bats.</p>
weecology/PortalData: 6.92.0
Authors: S. K. Morgan Ernest, Glenda M. Yenni, Ginger Allington, Ellen K. Bledsoe, Erica M. Christensen, Renata Diaz, Keith Geluso, Jacob R. Goheen, Qinfeng Guo, Edward Heske, Douglas Kelt, Joan M. Meiners, Jim Munger, Carla Restrepo, Douglas A. Samson, Michele R. Schutzenhofer, Marian Skupski, Sarah R. Supp, Katherine M. Thibault, Shawn D. Taylor, Ethan P. White, Diane W. Davidson, James H. Brown, Thomas J. Valone
Type: Dataset
Published: 2026-08-03
Keywords: ecology, time-series, long-term, continuous analysis

<p>v6.92.0</p>
Mosasauridae Gervais, 1852 Subamily MOSASAURINAE Gervais 1852
Authors: Bardet, Nathalie, Desmares, Delphine, Sánchez-Pellicer, Raquel, Gardin, Silvia
Type: Taxonomic treatment
Published: 2021-05-10
Keywords: Biodiversity, Taxonomy, Animalia, Chordata, Mosasauridae

<p><b>Genus and species indet.</b></p><p><b><i>Other Jerusalem specimens</i></b></p><p>MATERIAL. — MHNM.0.419. 35-37: two badly preserved caudals whose position remains unclear (possibly median caudals), and an indeterminate bone that could be either part of a neural arch or crushed skull fragments (Fig. 7 E-G; Table 1).</p><p>GEOGRAPHIC AND STRATIGRAPHIC PROVENANCES. — Same as “ Jerusalem Specimen 1” (see Fig. 1).</p><p>DESCRIPTION AND COMPARISON (Fig. 7 E-G)</p><p>Two very damaged caudal vertebrae are preserved. They both bear subhexagonal articular surfaces. However, on one the ventral surface is not preserved so it is not possible to see if it is a pygal or a median caudal. The other one bears chevrons but its lateral surfaces are eroded so it is not possible to see if it is a median or a posterior caudal. Because of its subhexagonal articular surfaces, it could be a median caudal. A mass of entangled broken bones cannot be determined. It could belong either to a badly preserved neural spine of a cervical or dorsal vertebra, or to agglutinated fragments of skull, possibly from around the prefrontal-maxillary-frontal region.</p>
Mosasauridae Gervais, 1852 Subamily MOSASAURINAE Gervais 1852
Authors: Bardet, Nathalie, Desmares, Delphine, Sánchez-Pellicer, Raquel, Gardin, Silvia
Type: Taxonomic treatment
Published: 2021-05-10
Keywords: Biodiversity, Taxonomy, Animalia, Chordata, Mosasauridae

<p><b>Genus and species indet.</b></p><p><b><i>Jerusalem Specimen 3</i></b></p><p>MATERIAL. — MHNM.0.419.5, 34: an anterior median caudal described by Répelin (1915) and another anterior median caudal (Fig. 7C, D; Table 1).</p><p>GEOGRAPHIC AND STRATIGRAPHIC OCCURRENCES. — Same as “ Jerusalem Specimen 1” (see Fig. 1).</p><p>DESCRIPTION AND COMPARISON (Fig. 7C, D)</p><p>These two median caudal vertebrae bear both transverse processes and haemal arches. They are much smaller than Specimens 1 and 2, with length equal to height (about 24 mm) and slightly larger than wide (22 mm) but this could be due to a slight lateral compression. They are of exactly the same size and match one another, so they could belong to adjacent or near-adjacent vertebrae of the same individual. The articular surfaces are slightly concave, the cotyle being almost rounded, whereas the condyle is very slightly vertically oval. As for the vertebrae of the “ Jerusalem Specimen 2”, there is a small constriction between the condyle and the lateral surface of the centrum. The neural canal is very narrow but its shape cannot be determined. The transverse processes are large, occupying about 2 ⁄ 3 of the lateral surface of the centrum and located anteroventrally on it. The ventral surfaces of the centrum are regularly convex and bear small median nutritive foramina, as well as chevrons that are large compared to the centrum size and located posteroventrally. Though broken, they were clearly fused to the centrum and from their rounded cross-section of the preserved base, it could be deduced that they were strongly posteriorly oriented.</p><p>The position of the transverse processes on the lateral surface of the centra and their large size indicate that they are anterior median caudals. By comparison, the comparable ones of specimens 1 and 2 are twice this size. This animal was thus small, probably no more than 2-3 meters long.</p><p>Because the haemal arches are fused to the centrum, these vertebrae clearly belong to the Mosasaurinae clade (Russell 1967; Bell & Polcyn 2005). These two vertebrae, except their small size and slightly different position on the median part of the tail (anterior versus posterior), are rather similar to those of “ Jerusalem Specimen 2”, especially in their almost rounded articular surface, differing clearly from the roughly triangular ones of “ Jerusalem Specimen 1”. They could belong to a juvenile individual of the same taxon as “ Jerusalem Specimen 2”.</p>
Mosasauridae Gervais, 1852 Subamily MOSASAURINAE Gervais 1852
Authors: Bardet, Nathalie, Desmares, Delphine, Sánchez-Pellicer, Raquel, Gardin, Silvia
Type: Taxonomic treatment
Published: 2021-05-10
Keywords: Biodiversity, Taxonomy, Animalia, Chordata, Mosasauridae

<p><b>Genus and species indet.</b></p><p><b><i>Jerusalem specimen 2</i></b></p><p>MATERIAL. — MHNM.0.419.4, 33: a posterior median caudal vertebra described by Répelin (1915), and another posterior median caudal (Fig. 7A, B; Table 1).</p><p>GEOGRAPHIC AND STRATIGRAPHIC PROVENANCES. <i>—</i> Same as “ Jerusalem Specimen 1” (see Fig. 1).</p><p>DESCRIPTION AND COMPARISON (Fig. 7A, B)</p><p>These two median caudal vertebrae bear both transverse processes and haemal arches. They are large, and the length (30 mm) is smaller than the width (35 mm) and height (36 mm). They are of exactly the same size and match one to another, so they could belong to adjacent or near-adjacent vertebrae of the same individual. The articular surfaces are regularly concave and convex, and both the cotyle and the condyle are almost rounded. The condyle is surrounded laterally by a ridge of bone that forms a slight constriction with the rest of the centrum. The neural canal is small and triangular. Though broken, the neural arches were likely laterally narrow and only slightly posteriorly oriented. The transverse processes are small and horizontally oval, located on the anteroventral part of the centrum. The ventral surface of the centrum is rather flat and bears fused chevrons that are strongly posteriorly oriented.</p><p>The small size and position of the transverse processes on the lateral surface of the centrum indicate that they are rather posterior median caudals. Because the haemal arches are fused to the centrum, these vertebrae clearly belong to the Mosasaurinae clade (Russell 1967; Bell & Polcyn 2005). Though of similar size, the rounded articular surfaces of these vertebrae differ from those of “ Jerusalem Specimen 1” which bear rather triangular articular surfaces, so they probably correspond to another mosasaurine taxon, though this cannot be determined. On the contrary, they are similar in shape to those of the “ Jerusalem Specimen 3” described below but stand out by being twice their size.</p>
Social Media Discourse Dataset: Framing of Regional Head Presence at Indonesian Protests, August–September 2025
Authors: Arifirnando, Rio, Boga, Rovaldy Ardiansyah, Bedara, Fransiskus, Asmuruf, Siloamsus, Patola, Jeki Kornelis, Tandi Datu, Clara Joice Marsella, Rivaldy, Randi, Prasetyo, Satria Iman
Type: Dataset
Published: 2026-08-03
Keywords: social media, framing theory, political communication, protest, Indonesia, content analysis

<p>This dataset contains a de-identified, item-level coded dataset (n = 7,905 records) derived from social media content collected via Intelligence Socio Analytic (ISA), supporting the manuscript 'Protest Framing Shift on Social Media: Comparing Populist and Cultural Leadership Responses in Indonesia' (submitted to F1000Research). Fields include framing category, sentiment category, dominant emotion category, platform, content type, post date, engagement metrics, and platform-inferred demographic attributes. Verbatim post text and exact time-of-day have been excluded for ethical, copyright, and privacy reasons — see the accompanying README sheet for full details.</p>
Habeastrum Simone 2019
Authors: Hausdorf, Bernhard, Roosen, Marijn T., Tapia, Elicio
Type: Taxonomic treatment
Published: 2026-08-03
Keywords: Biodiversity, Taxonomy, Animalia, Mollusca, Gastropoda, Architaenioglossa, Diplommatinidae, Habeastrum

<p><i>Habeastrum</i> Simone, 2019</p><p><i>Habeastrum</i> Simone, 2019: 287. Type species (by original designation): <i>Habeastrum parafusum</i> Simone, 2019.</p><p><b>Diagnosis.</b></p><p><i>Habeastrum</i> is characterised by minute dextral, elongated conical to cylindrical shells with regularly increasing whorls, an open umbilicus, and a non-expanded peristome.</p>
Podonta biformis Reitter 1889
Authors: Novák, Vladimír, Khudhur, Farhad A., Purchart, Luboš
Type: Taxonomic treatment
Published: 2026-03-31
Keywords: Biodiversity, Taxonomy, Animalia, Arthropoda, Insecta, Coleoptera, Tenebrionidae, Podonta, Podonta biformis

<p>27. <i>Podonta biformis</i> Reitter, 1889: 374.</p><p>General distribution: Armenia, Iran, Iraq, Syria, Turkey.</p>
Omophlus nigripes Kuster 1850
Authors: Novák, Vladimír, Khudhur, Farhad A., Purchart, Luboš
Type: Taxonomic treatment
Published: 2026-03-31
Keywords: Biodiversity, Taxonomy, Animalia, Arthropoda, Insecta, Coleoptera, Tenebrionidae, Omophlus, Omophlus nigripes

<p>26. <i>Omophlus nigripes</i> Küster, 1850: 65.</p><p>General distribution: Greece, Iran, Iraq, Syria, Turkey.</p>
Omophlus scutellaris Mulsant 1856
Authors: Novák, Vladimír, Khudhur, Farhad A., Purchart, Luboš
Type: Taxonomic treatment
Published: 2026-03-31
Keywords: Biodiversity, Taxonomy, Animalia, Arthropoda, Insecta, Coleoptera, Tenebrionidae, Omophlus, Omophlus scutellaris

<p>25. <i>Omophlus scutellaris</i> Mulsant, 1856: 56.</p><p>General distribution: Egypt, Iraq.</p>
Omophlus nasreddini Reitter 1890
Authors: Novák, Vladimír, Khudhur, Farhad A., Purchart, Luboš
Type: Taxonomic treatment
Published: 2026-03-31
Keywords: Biodiversity, Taxonomy, Animalia, Arthropoda, Insecta, Coleoptera, Tenebrionidae, Omophlus, Omophlus nasreddini

<p>24. <i>Omophlus nasreddini</i> Reitter, 1890: 51.</p><p>General distribution: Iran, Iraq, Syria, Turkey.</p>
Omophlus laciniatus Seidlitz 1896
Authors: Novák, Vladimír, Khudhur, Farhad A., Purchart, Luboš
Type: Taxonomic treatment
Published: 2026-03-31
Keywords: Biodiversity, Taxonomy, Animalia, Arthropoda, Insecta, Coleoptera, Tenebrionidae, Omophlus, Omophlus laciniatus

<p>21. <i>Omophlus laciniatus</i> Seidlitz, 1896: 244, 263.</p><p>General distribution: Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, Iran, Iraq, Kyrgyzstan, Syria, Turkey.</p>
Omophlus kurda Znojko 1950
Authors: Novák, Vladimír, Khudhur, Farhad A., Purchart, Luboš
Type: Taxonomic treatment
Published: 2026-03-31
Keywords: Biodiversity, Taxonomy, Animalia, Arthropoda, Insecta, Coleoptera, Tenebrionidae, Omophlus, Omophlus kurda

<p>20. <i>Omophlus kurda</i> Znojko in Ogloblin & Znojko, 1950: 97.</p><p>General distribution: Endemic to Iraq.</p>
Magdanalia alhazimiica Novak 2020
Authors: Novák, Vladimír, Khudhur, Farhad A., Purchart, Luboš
Type: Taxonomic treatment
Published: 2026-03-31
Keywords: Biodiversity, Taxonomy, Animalia, Arthropoda, Insecta, Coleoptera, Tenebrionidae, Magdanalia, Magdanalia alhazimiica

<p>3. <i>Magdanalia alhazimiica</i> Novák, 2020b: 505.</p><p>General distribution: Endemic to Iraq.</p>
Hymenalia buresi Novak 2025
Authors: Novák, Vladimír, Khudhur, Farhad A., Purchart, Luboš
Type: Taxonomic treatment
Published: 2026-03-31
Keywords: Biodiversity, Taxonomy, Animalia, Arthropoda, Insecta, Coleoptera, Tenebrionidae, Hymenalia, Hymenalia buresi

<p>2. <i>Hymenalia buresi</i> Novák, 2025a: 36.</p><p>General distribution: Iraq, Israel, Jordan.</p>
Psechrus Thorell 1878
Authors: Chen, Run, Yang, Zi-Zhong
Type: Taxonomic treatment
Published: 2026-07-24
Keywords: Biodiversity, Taxonomy, Animalia, Arthropoda, Arachnida, Araneae, Psechridae, Psechrus

<p><b><i>sinensis</i> group</b></p><p>For description and diagnosis of the <i>sinensis</i> group see Bayer (2012: 96–97). All four new species described in the present study belong to the <i>sinensis</i> group.</p>
Psechrus Thorell 1878
Authors: Chen, Run, Yang, Zi-Zhong
Type: Taxonomic treatment
Published: 2026-07-24
Keywords: Biodiversity, Taxonomy, Animalia, Arthropoda, Arachnida, Araneae, Psechridae, Psechrus

<p><b>Genus <i>Psechrus</i> Thorell, 1878</b></p><p>Fig. 2</p><p><b>Diagnosis</b></p><p>For description and diagnosis of the genus see Bayer (2012).</p>
Omophlus pilosellus Kirsch 1869
Authors: Novák, Vladimír, Khudhur, Farhad A., Purchart, Luboš
Type: Taxonomic treatment
Published: 2026-03-31
Keywords: Biodiversity, Taxonomy, Animalia, Arthropoda, Insecta, Coleoptera, Tenebrionidae, Omophlus, Omophlus pilosellus

<p>22. <i>Omophlus pilosellus</i> Kirsch, 1869: 120.</p><p>General distribution: Bulgaria, Croatia, Greece, Iraq, Italy, Turkey.</p>
Cteniopus pallidus
Authors: Novák, Vladimír, Khudhur, Farhad A., Purchart, Luboš
Type: Taxonomic treatment
Published: 2026-03-31
Keywords: Biodiversity, Taxonomy, Animalia, Arthropoda, Insecta, Coleoptera, Tenebrionidae, Cteniopus, Cteniopus pallidus

<p>15. <i>Cteniopus pallidus</i> (Küster, 1850: 82) (as <i>Cistela</i>)</p><p>General distribution: Cyprus, Iran, Iraq, Saudi Arabia, Syria, Turkey.</p>
Cteniopus erbilensis Nabeel, Gazang & Hazim 2016
Authors: Novák, Vladimír, Khudhur, Farhad A., Purchart, Luboš
Type: Taxonomic treatment
Published: 2026-03-31
Keywords: Biodiversity, Taxonomy, Animalia, Arthropoda, Insecta, Coleoptera, Tenebrionidae, Cteniopus, Cteniopus erbilensis

<p>14. <i>Cteniopus erbilensis</i> Nabeel, Gazang & Hazim, 2016: 216.</p><p>General distribution: Endemic to Iraq.</p>
Cteniopus angustatus Pic 1905
Authors: Novák, Vladimír, Khudhur, Farhad A., Purchart, Luboš
Type: Taxonomic treatment
Published: 2026-03-31
Keywords: Biodiversity, Taxonomy, Animalia, Arthropoda, Insecta, Coleoptera, Tenebrionidae, Cteniopus, Cteniopus angustatus

<p>13. <i>Cteniopus angustatus</i> Pic, 1905: 177.</p><p>General distribution: Iran, Iraq.</p>
Cteniopus persicus Ogloblin 1950
Authors: Novák, Vladimír, Khudhur, Farhad A., Purchart, Luboš
Type: Taxonomic treatment
Published: 2026-03-31
Keywords: Biodiversity, Taxonomy, Animalia, Arthropoda, Insecta, Coleoptera, Tenebrionidae, Cteniopus, Cteniopus persicus

<p>12. <i>Cteniopus persicus</i> Ogloblin in Ogloblin & Znojko, 1950: 72.</p><p>General distribution: Afghanistan, Iran, Iraq, Syria, Turkey.</p>
Cteniopus drurei Pic 1915
Authors: Novák, Vladimír, Khudhur, Farhad A., Purchart, Luboš
Type: Taxonomic treatment
Published: 2026-03-31
Keywords: Biodiversity, Taxonomy, Animalia, Arthropoda, Insecta, Coleoptera, Tenebrionidae, Cteniopus, Cteniopus drurei

<p>11. <i>Cteniopus drurei</i> Pic, 1915: 14.</p><p>General distribution: Endemic to Iraq.</p>