Summarize the following court judgment. r Petition (Civil) No. 344 of 1983. Under article 139A of the Constitution of India for transfer of Writ Petition No. 475 of 1983 pending before the Rajasthan High Court. D. Bhandari for the Petitioner (Not Present) B. D. Sharma for the Respondent. The Order of the court was delivered by 200 CHINNAPPA REDDY	 J. This petition is totally bereft of any statement of facts. It has been drafted and filed in a most casual and careless manner. All that is stated in the petition is that the Writ Petition pending in the Rajasthan High Court raises exactly the same questions as those raised in SLP (Civil) No. 7561/83 pending in this Court and the writ petition may	 therefore	 be transferred to this Court. Nothing else is mentioned. No facts relating to either case are mentioned. Even the alleged common questions are not stated. We can only say that it is most discourteous and disrespectful to the highest court in the country to file such indifferent petitions. The advocate is not discharging his duty either to the court or to the client. Transfer petition is dismissed. H.S.K. Petition dismissed.

A petition for withdrawing a writ petition pending in the High Court to the Supreme Court under Article 139A (1) of the Constitution mentioned nothing else except that the writ petition pending in the High Court raised exactly the same questions as those raised in a special leave petition pending in the Supreme Court. What the questions were and what the facts of the cases were was not disclosed. Dismissing the petition	 ^ HELD: It is most discourteous and disrespectful to the highest court in the country to file such indifferent petitions. The advocate; is not discharging his duty either to the court or to the client. [200 C]