Summarize the following court judgment. Special Leave Petition No. 1900 of 1981 etc. From the Judgment and order dated 3.2.1981 of the Allahabad High Court in C.M.W.P. No. 1924 of 1981. P.P. Rao	 Ambrish Kumar	 Mrs. Rani Chhabra	 M. Qamaruddin	 Mrs. Qamaruddin	 A.K. Srivastava	 B.B. Tawakley	 Mrs. Subhadra	 S.N. Singh	 C.K. Ratnaparkhi	 S.K. Gupta	 Uma Dutt	 C.P. Lal	 M.K. Garg	 and Lokesh Kumar for the Petitioners. Anil Dev Singh	 O.P. Rana	 B.P. Maheshwari	 Mrs. section Dikshit	 P.K. Pillai	 R. Ramachandran	 A.K. Srivastava	 S.C. Birla	 section Wasim	 A. Qadri	 N.N. Sharma	 Shakeel Ahmad and K.K. Gupta for the Respondents.

% In exercise of the powers conferred by Section 239(2)(E)(a) of the Uttar Pradesh Kshetra Samiti and Zila Parishads Adhiniyam	 1961	 various Zila Parishads framed a bye law	 providing that right to trade in carcass utilisation in the rural area of the respective Zila Parishads shall be put to public auction. Such activities comprised of taking of the carcass of dead animals to a specified place	 skinning of the carcass	 storage of bones and skins	 curing and dyeing of such skins and preparation of leather goods. In a writ petition challenging the validity of the said bye law	 a Single Judge of the High Court struck down the latter part of the bye law framed by one of the Zila Parishads	 providing for farming out of the privilege of utilisation and disposal of carcass of dead animals	 on the ground that it created a monopoly in favour of an individual or group of individuals. A Division Bench reiterated that view in two writ petitions filed before it	 and distinguished the decision of this Court in State of Maharashtra vs Mumbai Upnagar Gramodyog Sangh	 ; taking a contrary view on the ground that the restrictions were reason able within the meaning of article 19(6)	 in the context of the thickly populated metropolitan city. The correctness of the said decision of the Division Bench was open to question. Another Division Bench referred the matter to a Full Bench	 which expressly repelled the aforesaid view	 and held that it was competent for the Zila Parishads to frame such bye laws in exercise of the powers conferred by section 239(2)(E)(a) of the Act. 539 Against the various judgments and orders of the High Court	 special leave petitions and appeals by special leave challenging the constitutional validity of the aforesaid bye law	 were filed in this Court. In SLP(C) No. 1900 of 1981	 this Court	 in order to protect the interests of persons traditionally engaged in the work of skinning	 tanning etc.	 directed the State Government to frame a Model Scheme for carcass utilisation in the Etawa district at the village panchayat level on an experimental basis	 and passed certain incidental directions as to the price payable for skins	 bones and horns. As nothing further was done	 in partial modification of its earlier orders	 this Court directed the Zila Parishad	 Etawa to issue licence to any person who applied for the same. In the meantime	 the Government of Uttar Pradesh issued a Circular dated June 7	 1986 stating that in future the licences for disposal of carcass of animals should be granted only to registered industrial cooperative societies formed by the persons engaged in this work. Disposing of the Special Leave Petitions and civil appeals	 ^ HELD: It is plain upon the reading of the Circular dated June 7	 1986 issued by the State Government that the contract system envisaged by the impugned bye law framed by the different Zila Parishads in the State has been virtually abandoned	 and the State Government proposes to replace the system of auction by a system of licensing	 giving preferential right to cooperative societies consisting of members of the traditional occupation	 for the disposal of carcass of dead animals. [544E F] In view of the subsequent policy decision taken by the State Government	 the present controversy no longer survives. It would be open to different Zila Parishads	 in view of the directive of the State Government	 to frame the appropriate Bye laws consistent with and for the implementations of the policy declared by the State Government. The Zila Parishads	 while considering the question	 shall keep in view the directions issued by this Court on April 15	 1983	 and also the order passed introducing the licence system in the Zila Parishad	 Etawa on an experimental basis.[544F G] For a meaningful effectuation of the policy decision of the Government	 which is taken in the larger interests of a sizeable segment of the weaker sections of the society	 it is of utmost importance that the 540 work of formation of cooperative society of the members of the traditional occupation	 who lack the will and the ability to organise themselves	 should be taken up by the social welfare department of the State Government and every effort should be made to bring the members of the traditional occupation within the fold of these cooperative societies. The social welfare department shall take effective steps to organise such cooperative societies. [544H; 545A B] Wherever it is not possible to implement the policy decision and there is likely to be a loss of revenue or other compelling reason	 it would be open to the Zila Parishads	 as a purely transitory measure and with the prior concurrence of the State Government	 to arrange for carcass utilisation by auction if the Bye laws permit such auction. It is only where	 for any compelling reason	 the said policy decision cannot be implemented effectively in any area	 that the concerned Zila Parishad could	 with the prior sanction of the State Government	 continue the present contract system subject to such variation as may be necessary till the cooperative societies are formed. [545C D1]