Summarize the following court judgment. Appeal No. 289 of 1961. Appeal by special leave from the judgment and order dated February 6	 1959	 of the Bombay High Court in Special Civil Appeal No. 2647 of 1958. M. C. Setalvad	 C. K. Daphtary Solicitor General of India	 section B. Jathar and R. H. Dhebar	 for the appellants. section G. Patwardhan and A. C. Ratnaparkhi	 for respondent No. 1. 50 1963. February 13. The judgment of the Court was delivered by SHAH J. With special leave	 the Collector of South Satara has appeared against the order of the High Court of judicature at Bombay directing him to assess compensation payable to the respondent under section 9 (1) of the Bombay Pargana and kulkarni Watans (Abolition) Act	 1950. Laxman Mahadev Deshpande hereinafter called 'the respondent ' was the holder of Paragana Watan land bearing Survey Nos. 503/2. and 504/1 in Mouza Aitwade	 Taluka Valve	 District South Satara. Performance of service in respect of the Watan had been commuted under an arrangement made in or about 1864 under a commutation settlement popularly known as "Gordon Settlement" whereby the holder was	 on agreeing to pay a fixed sum	 relieved of the obligation to perform service as a Village Officer. The Legislature of the State of Bombay enacted an Act called the Bombay Paragana and Kulkarni Watans (Abolition) Act LX of 1950	 which abolished all Paragana and Kulkarni Watans. The respondent applied to the Collector of South Satara for an order under section 9 of the Act awarding Rs. 10	479 2 8 as compensation for extinction of his right in the watan land	 and of his "right to enjoy part of the land revenue. " By his order dated April 29	 1957	 the Collector rejected the application	 and the order of the Collector was affirmed by the Bombay Revenue Tribunal in appeal under section 9 (4) of the Act. But in petition under article 227 of the Constitution the High Court of Bombay set aside the order of the Collector and directed that officer to assess and pay compensation to the respondent under section 9 (1) of the Abolition Act. The land was granted to an ancestor of the respondent as remuneration for performance of Paragana service some time in the sixteenth century 51 by the Ruler of Satara	 and that grant was confirmed by the British Government. The original grant and the confirmation sanad have not been produced	 but it is common ground between the parties that the grant was of the soil and not merely of the royal share of revenue. In adjudging the claim made by the respondent for compensation under section 9 of the Bombay Paragana and Kulkarni Watans (Abolition) Act it is necessary in the first instance to ascertain the true character of the rights of a watandar in the land granted as remuneration for performance of service and the effect of the commutation settlement	 in the light of the material provisions of the Bombay Hereditary ices Act	 III of 1874	 commonly known as the Watan Act. By section 4 of the Watan Act `Watan property ' is defined as meaning " 'moveable or immovable property held	 acquired	 or assigned for providing remuneration for the performance of the duty appertaining to an hereditary ice x X" 'Hereditary ice ' is defined as meaning "every ice held hereditarily for the performance of duties connected with the administration or collection of the public revenue or with the village police	 or with the settlement of boundaries	 or other matters of civil administration. The expression includes such ice even where the services originally appertaining to it have ceased to be demanded. The watan property	 if any	 and the hereditary ice and the rights and privileges attached to them together constitute the watan" and the expression `watandar ' means a person having an hereditary interest in a watan : it includes a person holding watan property acquired by him before the introduction of the British Government into the locality of the watan	 or legally acquired subsequent to such introduction	 and a person holding such property from him by inheritance. Section 15 of the Act provides for commutation of service. By sub section (1) it is provided : "The Collector may	 with the consent of the 52 holder of a watan	 given in writing	 relieve him and his heirs	 and successors in perpetuity of their liability to perform service upon such conditions	 whether consistent with the provisions of this Act or not	 as may be agreed upon by the Collector and such holder." By sub section (2) which was repealed by Act XVI of 1895	 it was provided : " 'Any settlement made for this purpose before the date of this Act coming into force by any Collector or other officer acting on behalf of Government with the holder of any watan shall have the same force as if made under this Act. " Clause (3) provides : "Every settlement made or confirmed under this section shall be binding upon both the State Government and the holder of the watan and his heirs and successors. " It is clear that the watan property	 if any	 the hereditary ice	 and the rights and privileges attached thereto	 together constitute a watan and a hereditary ice does not lose its character merely because the service originally appertaining to the ice has ceased to be demanded. Commutation of service does not therefore	 in the absence of an express agreement to that effect alter the tenure of the land held as watan. By agreement	 the State	 for consideration	 may agree to relieve the holder of the ice and his successors of the duty to perform the service for performance of which the grant was made	 but the ice and the grant continue	 subject to the terms of the settlement under section 15 of the Bombay Hereditary ices Act	 1874. In Appaji Bapuji vs Keshav Shamrav (1)	 the nature of the tenure of land held originally as (1) Bow. 53 watan.land	 after commutation of service	 fell to be determined before the Bombay High Court	 Sargent C. J.	 observed at p. 23 : "What is termed a Gordon Settlement was an arrangement entered into in 1864 by a Committee	 of which Mr. Gordon	 as Collector	 was chairman	 acting on behalf of Government with the vatandars in the Southern Maratha Country	 by which the Government relieved certain vatandars in perpetuity from liability to perform the services attached to their ices in consideration of a 'judi ' or quit rent charged upon the vatan lands. x x x x x x the reports of Mr. Gordon 's Committee on the Satara and Poona Districts and their correspondence with Government can	 we think	 leave no doubt that the settlements made by that committee	 unless it was otherwise specially provided by any particular settlement	 were not intended by either party to these settlements	 to convert the vatan lands into the private property of the vatandars with the necessary incident of alienability	 but to leave them attached to the hereditary ices	 which although freed from the performance of service remained intact	 as shown by the definition of hereditary ice in the declaratory Act III of 1874. " But the Commutation settlement does not confer an indefeasible title to the grantee	 for the right affirmed by the settlement under section 15 (3) of the Watan Act is liable to be determined by lapse	 confiscation or resumption (section 22 of the Watan Act). The State having created the watan	 is entitled to put an end to the watan i. e. to cancel the watan and to resume the grant : Bachharam Datta Patil vs Vishwanath Pundalik Patil (1). Therefore if there be mere commutation of service	 the watan ice ordinarily (1) ; 54 survives without liability to perform service	 and on that account the character of watan property still remains attached to the grant. But the State Government may abolish the ice and release the property from its character as watan property. It is in the light of these features of the watan and the property granted for remuneration of the Watandar that the relevant provisions of the Bombay Paragana and Kulkarni Watans (Abolition) Act	 have to be considered in adjudging the right to receive compensation claimed by the respondent on abolition of his watan. By section 3 of the Abolition Act	 it is provided that : "With effect from and on the appointed day	 notwithstanding anything contained in any law	 usage	 settlement	 grant	 sanad or order (1) all Paragana and Kulkarni watans shall be deemed to have been abolished ; (2) all rights to hold ice and any liability to render service appertaining to the said watans are hereby extinguished; (3) subject to the provisions of section 4	 all watan land is hereby resumed and shall be deemed to be subject to the payment of land revenue under the provisions of the Code and the rules made thereunder as if it were an unalienated land : Provided that such resumption shall not affect the validity of any alienation of such watan land made in accordance with the provisions of 55 section 5 of the Watan Act or the rights of an alience thereof or any person claiming under or through him; (4) all incidents appertaining to the said watans are hereby extinguished. " The material part of section 4 provides that : "A watan land resumed under the provisions of this Act shall x x x x be regranted to the holder of the watan to which it appertained	 on payment of the occupancy price equal to twelve times of the amount of the full assessment of such land x x x x x x and the holder shall be deemed to be an occupant within the meaning of the Code in respect of such land x x x; all the provisions of the Code and rules "relating to unalienated land shall	 subject to the provisions of this Act	 apply to the said land:" By section 6 right to compensation in lieu of cash allowance or land revenue is granted. It provides : "6. Notwithstanding anything contained in any law	 usage	 settlement	 grant	 sanad or order	 (1) a sum equal to seven times the amount of the cash allowance due to a holder on the appointed day of a watan in respect of which a commutation settlement has been effected	 shall be paid to such holder; (2) in the case of any land or village	 in respect of which the watan property consists of the whole or a part of the land revenue of such land or village	 a sum equal to ten times the 56 amount of such land revenue shall be paid to the holder x x x x x X." Section 9 provides for assessment and payment of compensation for the abolition	 extinction or modification by virtue of section 3 of rights in property not provided for in the Act. Sub section (1) provides : "If any person is aggrieved by the provisions of this Act as abolishing	 extinguishing or modifying any of his rights to or interest in property and if compensation for such abolition	 extinguishment or modification has not been pro vided for in the provisions of this Act such person may apply to the Collector for compensation. " Sub section (2) prescribes the procedure of an application for compensation and sub section (3) precludes the grant of compensation to any person on the ground that any watan land which was wholly or partially exempt from the payment of land revenue has been under the provisions of the Act subjected to the payment of full assessment. It appears clear from the scheme of section 6 that if the remuneration of the Watandar is merely cash allowance	 or part or whole of the land revenue of the land	 compensation at the rate prescribed is payable to the holder on abolition of the watan. If the remuneration consists not of cash allowance or remission of land revenue	 but of the land itself by the combined operation of sections 3(3) and 4 the holder of the watan land is entitled to be regranted occupancy rights as in unalienated land. Section 9 deals with the rights of persons to receive compensation for abolition	 extinguishment or modification of the right or interest in watan property by virtue of the provisions of the Act	 in cases where no other provision is made in that behalf in the Act. There is 57 no serious dispute raised about this being the true position in law. But two questions remain in controversy between the parties : (1) Whether the right to or interest in property of a watandar is abolished	 extinguished or modified by the provisions of the Bombay Paragana and Kulkarni Watans (Abolition) Act; and (2) Whether provision for compensation for the abolition	 extinguishment or modification or the right or interest in the watan land of the holder is made by any provision in the Act	 so as to exclude the operation of section 9(1) of the Act. The first question presents little difficulty in its solution. Section 3 in terms provides for abolition of the watan	 extinction of the ice and modification of the right in which the land is held. The abolition	 extinction and modification arise by the operation of section 3 of the Act	 ' and not from the exercise of the executive power of confiscation or resumption	 by the State. Undoubtedly the power of resumption of a watan may be exercised under section 22 of the watan Act and such a resumption may destroy the right of the holder both to the ice and the watan land	 and in the absence of any provision in that behalf no right to compensation may arise. But where the abolition of the watan is not by executive action	 but by legislative decree	 its consequences must be sought in the statute which effectuates that abolition. On the second question the respondent affirms the contention which appealed to the High Court that where the grant to a watandar is of the soil and 58 not merely of cash allowance or of remission of land revenue as remuneration for performance of the duties of his ice	 compensation has to be awarded under section 9	 for Act LX of 1950 makes no provision for payment of compensation to the watandar for abolition of his ice and rights in the land held by him. The correctness of this view is challenged by the appellant. It must be remembered that the power which the State Government always possessed by the clearest implication of section 22 of the Bombay Hereditary ices Act	 1874	 of resumption is statutorily enforced by section 3 in respect of the Paragana and Kulkarni Watans. The State Government having the power to abolish a watan ice	 and to resume land granted as remuneration for performance of the duties attached to the ice was not obliged to compensate the wandar for extinction of his rights. But the Legislature has	 as a matter of grace	 presumably because of settlements between the holders and the Government under the Gordon Settlement	 provided by section 6 that cash compensation be awarded for loss of the right to cash allowance or remission of land revenue and has by section 4 Conferred upon the holder of the watan land	 for loss of his right	 a right to regrant of the land as occupant and free from the obligation imposed by its original tenure as watan land. Provision is also made by section 9 for awarding compensation to persons whose right or interest in property is abolished	 extinguished or modified by virtue of the section	 and no other provision for compensation for such extinction	 abolition or modification is made by the Act. The right to cash compensation under section 9 depends upon the existence of two conditions : the abolition	 extinction or modification of rights in property by virtue of the provisions of the Act; and the absence of any other provision in the Act for compensation in that behalf. If	 therefore	 section 4 which provides for conferment of occupancy rights in land	 be regarded as a provision for compensation for abolition	 extinction or modification of the 59 right to hold it as watan land	 the residuary enactment in section 9 will not on the plain terms be attracted. By the operation of section 3 all Paraganas and Kulkarni watans falling within the Act are abolished	 the right to hold ice is extinguished	 and the land granted as remuneration for performance of service is resumed. The holder of the land is thereafter liable to pay land revenue	 and is entitled	 on payment of the occupancy price at the prescribed rate	 to be regranted occupancy rights as if it is unalienated land. The right so conferred is	 though not a right to cash compensation	 a valuable right of occupancy in the land. By the resumption of watan land and regrant thereof in occupancy right	 all the restrictions placed upon the holder of watan land are by the provisions of the Watan Act	 and the terms of the grant	 statutorily abolished. But the right of occupancy granted by section 4 adequately compensates the holder for loss of the precarious interest of a watandar	 because the land regranted after abolition of the watan	 is held subject only to the restrictions imposed by sub section (2) of section 4	 and is freed from the incidents of watan tenure	 such as restriction on alienation beyond the life time of the holder	 devolution according to the special rule of succession	 and the liability to confiscation or resumption. In our judgment	 compensation contemplated to be awarded	 not as a matter of right but as of grace	 is not merely money compensation; it includes grant of occupancy rights which compensates for the loss of ice and the interest of a watandar in the land. By section 4 the Legislature has granted for the loss suffered by the watandar on abolition of the watan and the rights in watan land	 a right of occupancy in the land which may properly be regarded as compensating him for the abolition of his rights. Provision for levy of what is substantially a nominal occupancy price will not detract from that character. After the commutation settlement	 the holder being relieved of the obligation to perform service	 the ice of wandar survives in name only	 but the land 60 granted as walan remains subject to the restrictions imposed by the Watan Act. by the regrant of the land in occupancy right	 on abolition or extinction of the watan	 the holder is not in truth prejudicially affected. Loss of watan rights in land	 and the watan ice is compensated by the regrant of occupancy rights in the land. It would	 therefore	 be reasonable to infer that the Legislature contemplated the grant of compensation under sub section (2) of section 9 for abolition	 extinction or modification of rights other than the rights of the watandar to land or to cash allowance or remission of land revenue. The appeal is therefore allowed and the order passed by the High Court set aside. We are informed at the Bar that the respondent has not claimed right of occupancy in the land which was previously held by him as watan land be granted to him. Whether he will be entitled thereto in view of his failure to make a claim to a regrant is a matter on which we express no opinion. Having regard to the circumstances	 we direct that there will be no order as to costs throughout. Appeal allowed.

On abolition of his watan	 the respondent applied to the Collector claiming compensation under section 9 of the Bombay Paragana and Kulkarni Watans (Abolition) Act	 1950	 for extinction of his right in the watan land	 and of his "right to enjoy part of the land revenue. " The Collector rejected the application and in appeal the order was affirmed by the Revenue Tribunal. The High Court in a petition under article 227 of the Constitution set aside the order of the Collector and directed him to assess and pay compensation to the respondent under section 9 (1) of the Act. Held	 that the watan property if any the hereditary ice	 and the rights and privileges attached thereto	 together 49 constitute a watan	 and a hereditary ice does not lose its character merely because the service originally appertaining to the ice has ceased to be demanded. Commutation of service does not in the absence of an express agreement to that effect alter the tenure of the land held as watan. By agreement	 the State may relieve the holder of the ice and his successors of the duty to perform the service for which the grant was made	but the ice and the grant continue	 subject to the terms of the settlement under section 15 of the Bombay Hereditary Offices Act	 1874. Appaji Bapuji vs Keshav Shamrav	 (1890) 1. L. R. and Bachharam Datta Patil vs Viswanath Pundalik Patil	 ; 	 referred to. Held	 further	 that after the commutation settlement	 the holder being relieved of the obligation to perform service	 the ice of watandar survives in name only but the land granted as watan remains subject to the restrictions imposed by the Watan Act. By the regrant of the land in occupancy right	 on abolition or extinction of the watan	 the holder is not in truth prejudicially affected. Loss of watan rights in land	 and the watan ice is compensated by the regrant of occupancy rights in the land. Grant of compensation was contemplated under sub section (2) of section 9 of the Bombay Paragana and Kulkarni Watans (Abolition) Act for abolition	 extinction or modification of rights other than the rights of a watandar	 to land or cash allowance or remission of land revenue.