| 1 | A | B | C | D | E | F | G |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 2 | individual and contextual characteristics associated with certain characteristics of personal networks, census metropolitan areas of montreal, toronto and vancouver, 2013 |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| 3 | individual and place of residence characteristics | characteristics of personal networks |  |  |  |  |  |
| 4 |  | analysis method - logistic regressions |  | analysis method - ordered logistic regressions |  |  |  |
| 5 |  | persons with a personal network of more than 15 people | persons with a network of acquaintances of more than 10 people | meetings with family in the last month | meetings with friends in the last month | new people met in the last month | ethnic diversity among friends contacted in the last month |
| 6 |  | odds ratios |  |  |  |  |  |
| 7 | census metropolitan area |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| 8 | montreal | 0.90 | 0.66 | 1.44 | 1.00 | 0.89 | 0.63 |
| 9 | toronto | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| 10 | vancouver | 1.20 | 1.28 | 1.00 | 1.25 | 0.96 | 0.98 |
| 11 | type of municipality |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| 12 | central | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| 13 | peripheral 1st ring | 0.73 | 0.71 | 1.33 | 1.01 | 0.94 | 0.75 |
| 14 | peripheral 2nd ring | 0.50 | 0.44 | 1.26 | 0.73 | 0.88 | 0.74 |
| 15 | demographic weight of immigrant population in neighbourhood |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| 16 | less than 50% | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| 17 | 50% to less than 70% | 1.28 | 1.03 | 1.07 | 0.95 | 1.06 | 0.86 |
| 18 | 70% or greater | 0.93 | 0.68 | 1.03 | 0.74 | 0.87 | 0.85 |
| 19 | period of immigration and generation |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| 20 | recent immigrant | 0.67 | 0.70 | 0.38 | 0.91 | 1.49 | 0.69 |
| 21 | established immigrant | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| 22 | second generation | 1.38 | 1.13 | 1.52 | 1.11 | 1.07 | 0.91 |

Question: in which municipalities are people less likely to have more larger personal networks, first-ring peripheral municipalities or central municipalities?
Answer: peripheral 1st ring

Question: in which municipalities are people less likely to have more larger acquaintance networks, first-ring peripheral municipalities or central municipalities?
Answer: peripheral 1st ring

Question: in which municipalities are people less likely to have more larger personal networks, second-ring peripheral municipalities or central municipalities?
Answer: peripheral 2nd ring

Question: in which municipalities are people less likely to have more larger acquaintance networks, second-ring peripheral municipalities or central municipalities?
Answer: peripheral 2nd ring