| 1 | A | B | C | D |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 2 | this table displays the results of distribution of new immigrants at landing. the information is grouped by intended landing destination (appearing as row headers), 2000, 2010 and 2012, calculated using percent units of measure (appearing as column headers) |  |  |  |
| 3 | intended landing destination | 2000 | 2010 | 2012 |
| 4 |  | percent |  |  |
| 5 | newfoundland and labrador | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.3 |
| 6 | prince edward island | 0.1 | 0.9 | 0.4 |
| 7 | nova scotia | 0.7 | 0.9 | 0.9 |
| 8 | new brunswick | 0.3 | 0.8 | 0.9 |
| 9 | city of quebec | 0.6 | 0.5 | 1.1 |
| 10 | montreal | 12.5 | 16.6 | 18.1 |
| 11 | rest of quebec | 1.2 | 2.1 | 2.2 |
| 12 | ottawa | 3.4 | 2.6 | 2.4 |
| 13 | toronto | 48.4 | 32.8 | 30.0 |
| 14 | hamilton | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| 15 | rest of ontario | 5.5 | 5.3 | 4.4 |
| 16 | winnipeg | 1.6 | 4.4 | 4.3 |
| 17 | rest of manitoba | 0.4 | 1.2 | 0.9 |
| 18 | saskatchewan | 0.8 | 2.7 | 4.3 |
| 19 | calgary | 3.7 | 5.7 | 6.5 |
| 20 | edmonton | 1.9 | 3.9 | 4.6 |
| 21 | rest of alberta | 0.7 | 2.0 | 2.9 |
| 22 | vancouver | 14.6 | 13.3 | 11.4 |
| 23 | rest of british columbia | 1.9 | 2.4 | 2.7 |
| 24 | territories | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.2 |

Question: how much perenctage point has toronto fell when it comes to immigrants intended landing destination?
Answer: 15.6

Question: how much perenctage point has saskatchewan rose when it comes to immigrants intended landing destination?
Answer: 1.9

Question: how much perenctage point has atlantic provinces rose when it comes to immigrants intended landing destination?
Answer: 1.6

Question: how much perenctage point has alberta rose when it comes to immigrants intended landing destination?
Answer: 5.3

Question: how much perenctage point has manitoba rose when it comes to immigrants intended landing destination?
Answer: 3.6