| 1 | A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 2 | distribution of socio-demographics, health status and health behaviours, by cannabis user type, household population aged 15 and older, canada excluding territories, 2015 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| 3 |  | non-user |  |  |  | non-medical only |  |  |  | self-defined medical / non-medical |  |  |  |
| 4 |  | '000 | % | 95% confidence interval |  | '000 | % | 95% confidence interval |  | '000 | % | 95% confidence interval |  |
| 5 |  |  |  | from | to |  |  | from | to |  |  | from | to |
| 6 | total | 25,734.1 | 87.7 | 86.7 | 88.7 | 2,776.8 | 9.5 | 8.6 | 10.4 | 830.9 | 2.8 | 2.4 | 3.4 |
| 7 | sex |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| 8 | male | 12,283.7 | 85.1 | 83.5 | 86.5 | 1,572.1 | 10.9 | 9.6 | 12.3 | 587.0 | 4.1 | 3.3 | 5.0 |
| 9 | female | 13,450.4 | 90.3 | 89.0 | 91.4 | 1,204.8 | 8.1 | 7.1 | 9.2 | 243.9 | 1.6 | 1.2 | 2.2 |
| 10 | age group |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| 11 | 15 to 24 | 3,324.7 | 74.5 | 72.1 | 76.7 | 987.1 | 22.1 | 20.0 | 24.4 | 152.8 | 3.4 | 2.6 | 4.5 |
| 12 | 25 to 44 | 7,872.7 | 82.3 | 79.8 | 84.5 | 1,313.4 | 13.7 | 11.7 | 16.1 | 381.1 | 4.0 | 3.0 | 5.3 |
| 13 | 45 and older | 14,536.8 | 94.9 | 94.0 | 95.8 | 476.3 | 3.1 | 2.5 | 3.9 | 297.0 | 1.9 | 1.4 | 2.6 |
| 14 | province |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| 15 | newfoundland and labrador | 394.6 | 89.7 | 87.5 | 91.5 | 33.6 | 8.5 | 6.8 | 10.5 | 8.2 | 1.9 | 1.2 | 2.9 |
| 16 | prince edward island | 110.3 | 91.8 | 90.0 | 93.3 | 6.2 | 5.5 | 4.4 | 6.8 | 3.0 | 2.7 | 1.7 | 4.4 |
| 17 | nova scotia | 679.0 | 85.0 | 82.3 | 87.3 | 79.0 | 10.9 | 8.9 | 13.1 | 31.1 | 4.1 | 2.9 | 5.8 |
| 18 | new brunswick | 572.0 | 90.5 | 88.2 | 92.4 | 42.9 | 7.4 | 5.6 | 9.7 | 12.1 | 2.1 | 1.3 | 3.4 |
| 19 | quebec | 6,168.9 | 89.9 | 88.0 | 91.6 | 569.8 | 8.7 | 7.2 | 10.5 | 91.4 | 1.4 | 0.8 | 2.4 |
| 20 | ontario | 9,863.4 | 87.7 | 85.4 | 89.6 | 1,090.2 | 9.7 | 8.0 | 11.7 | 301.8 | 2.7 | 1.8 | 3.8 |
| 21 | manitoba | 914.8 | 89.2 | 87.1 | 91.1 | 75.1 | 7.0 | 5.6 | 8.6 | 40.0 | 3.8 | 2.6 | 5.4 |
| 22 | saskatchewan | 807.5 | 90.5 | 88.7 | 92.1 | 64.8 | 6.9 | 5.6 | 8.5 | 24.0 | 2.6 | 1.8 | 3.7 |
| 23 | alberta | 2,982.1 | 90.0 | 88.2 | 91.6 | 249.2 | 6.9 | 5.6 | 8.4 | 110.6 | 3.1 | 2.3 | 4.2 |
| 24 | british columbia | 3,241.5 | 82.7 | 80.4 | 84.8 | 451.9 | 11.8 | 9.9 | 14.1 | 208.5 | 5.4 | 4.1 | 7.2 |
| 25 | residence |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| 26 | population centre | 20,399.5 | 87.4 | 86.2 | 88.5 | 2,311.5 | 9.9 | 8.9 | 11.0 | 626.0 | 2.7 | 2.2 | 3.3 |
| 27 | rural | 5,334.6 | 88.8 | 86.6 | 90.7 | 465.3 | 7.7 | 6.2 | 9.7 | 204.9 | 3.4 | 2.5 | 4.7 |
| 28 | household income quintile |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| 29 | lowest 20% | 3,865.1 | 86.46758 | 83.8 | 88.8 | 408.2 | 9.1 | 7.3 | 11.4 | 196.8 | 4.4 | 3.1 | 6.3 |
| 30 | not lowest 20% | 21,869.0 | 87.92681 | 86.8 | 89.0 | 2,368.7 | 9.5 | 8.6 | 10.5 | 634.2 | 2.5 | 2.1 | 3.1 |
| 31 | self-perceived health |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| 32 | fair/poor | 2,116.4 | 90.7 | 87.8 | 93.0 | 84.6 | 3.6 | 2.5 | 5.3 | 132.7 | 5.7 | 3.9 | 8.2 |
| 33 | good/very good/excellent | 23,575.8 | 87.4 | 86.3 | 88.5 | 2,692.1 | 10.0 | 9.1 | 11.0 | 695.9 | 2.6 | 2.1 | 3.1 |
| 34 | self-perceived mental health |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| 35 | fair/poor | 1,098.4 | 78.6 | 71.6 | 84.2 | 195.0 | 13.9 | 9.3 | 20.5 | 104.6 | 7.5 | 4.8 | 11.4 |
| 36 | good/very good/excellent | 24,573.8 | 88.2 | 87.2 | 89.2 | 2,581.7 | 9.3 | 8.4 | 10.2 | 696.7 | 2.5 | 2.1 | 3.0 |
| 37 | daily smoker |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| 38 | yes | 1,896.4 | 69.6 | 64.6 | 74.1 | 555.1 | 20.4 | 16.6 | 24.8 | 274.2 | 10.1 | 7.5 | 13.4 |
| 39 | no | 23,837.7 | 89.6 | 88.5 | 90.5 | 2,221.7 | 8.3 | 7.5 | 9.3 | 556.7 | 2.1 | 1.7 | 2.6 |
| 40 | heavy drinking |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| 41 | yes | 4,644.2 | 70.6 | 67.4 | 73.6 | 1,562.0 | 23.7 | 21.1 | 26.7 | 371.5 | 5.6 | 4.2 | 7.5 |
| 42 | no | 20,965.6 | 92.7 | 91.7 | 93.6 | 1,208.0 | 5.3 | 4.6 | 6.2 | 446.6 | 2.0 | 1.6 | 2.5 |
| 43 | used other illicit drugs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| 44 | yes | 75.0 | 11.0 | 7.0 | 16.7 | 462.3 | 67.5 | 57.9 | 75.8 | 147.6 | 21.5 | 14.4 | 30.9 |
| 45 | no | 25,555.2 | 89.6 | 88.6 | 90.5 | 2,309.5 | 8.1 | 7.3 | 9.0 | 669.2 | 2.3 | 1.9 | 2.8 |
| 46 | used at least one class of psychoactive pharmaceuticals |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| 47 | yes | 5,156.3 | 83.3 | 80.9 | 85.5 | 652.0 | 10.5 | 8.9 | 12.5 | 381.0 | 6.2 | 4.8 | 7.8 |
| 48 | no | 20,156.4 | 89.1 | 87.9 | 90.2 | 2,051.2 | 9.1 | 8.1 | 10.2 | 422.6 | 1.9 | 1.4 | 2.4 |
| 49 | used at least one class of psychoactive pharmaceuticals non-therapeutically |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| 50 | yes | 251.9 | 57.4 | 45.2 | 68.7 | 129.5 | 29.5 | 19.8 | 41.4 | 57.8 | 13.2 | 7.0 | 23.3 |
| 51 | no | 25,394.9 | 88.2 | 87.2 | 89.2 | 2,620.0 | 9.1 | 8.3 | 10.0 | 762.5 | 2.6 | 2.2 | 3.2 |

Question: what was the percentage of canadians aged 15 to 24 who are considered past-year nmo cannabis users?
Answer: 22.1

Question: what was the percentage of canadians aged 25 to 44 who are considered past-year nmo cannabis users?
Answer: 13.7

Question: what was the percentage of british columbians who reported nmo cannabis use in the previous year?
Answer: 11.8

Question: what was the percentage of residents of prince edward island who reported nmo cannabis use in the previous year?
Answer: 5.5

Question: among sdmnm users,who were more likely to report past-year cannabis use,people living in the lowest 20% income households or those with higher incomes?
Answer: lowest 20%

Question: what was the percentage of daily cigarette smokers who reported using cannabis nmo in the previous year?
Answer: 20.4

Question: what was the multiple relationship between daily cigarette smokers who reported using cannabis nmo in the previous year and non-daily smokers ?
Answer: 2.457831

Question: among nmo users,who were more likely to report using cannabis in the previous year,those who rated their general health as good, very good or excellent or those who assessed it as worse?
Answer: good/very good/excellent