| 1 | A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 2 | cflim-at thresholds ($) for 2015 under old (adjusted family size) and new (√fsize) methodologies |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| 3 | number of children aged 15 and younger | former methodology |  |  |  | new methodology |  |  |  |
| 4 |  | number of adults |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| 5 |  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
| 6 | 0 | $18,213 | $25,498 | $32,783 | $40,069 | $20,137 | $28,478 | $34,878 | $40,274 |
| 7 | 1 | $25,498 | $30,962 | $38,247 | $45,533 | $28,478 | $34,878 | $40,274 | $45,028 |
| 8 | 2 | $30,962 | $36,426 | $43,711 | $50,996 | $34,878 | $40,274 | $45,028 | $49,325 |
| 9 | 3 | $36,426 | $41,890 | $49,175 | $56,460 | $40,274 | $45,028 | $49,325 | $53,277 |
| 10 | 4 | $41,890 | $47,354 | $54,639 | $61,924 | $45,028 | $49,325 | $53,277 | $56,956 |
| 11 | 5 | $47,354 | $52,818 | $60,103 | $67,388 | $49,325 | $53,277 | $56,956 | $60,411 |
| 12 | 6 | $52,818 | $58,282 | $65,567 | $72,852 | $53,277 | $56,956 | $60,411 | $63,679 |
| 13 | 7 | $58,282 | $63,746 | $71,031 | $78,316 | $56,956 | $60,411 | $63,679 | $66,787 |
| 14 | 8 | $63,746 | $69,209 | $76,495 | $83,780 | $60,411 | $63,679 | $66,787 | $69,757 |
| 15 | 9 | $69,209 | $74,673 | $81,959 | $89,244 | $63,679 | $66,787 | $69,757 | $72,605 |
| 16 | 10 | $74,673 | $80,137 | $87,422 | $94,708 | $66,787 | $69,757 | $72,605 | $75,346 |

Question: when the new method (√fsize) is used and the median is calculated for individuals rather than families, what is the threshold for the cflim-at for 2015?
Answer: $20,137

Question: what is the cflim-at threshold for individuals when the old method is used?
Answer: $18,213