| 1 | A | B | C | D | E |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 2 | impact of export-market participation on subsequent r&d intensity level, by firm size, using asm data |  |  |  |  |
| 3 | explanatory variables, prior to entry into export markets | growth of r&d intensity |  | change in the growth of r&d intensity |  |
| 4 |  | small firms | large firms | small firms | large firms |
| 5 | export-starter dummy |  |  |  |  |
| 6 | coefficient | 0.052 | 0.236 | 0.043 | -0.173 |
| 7 | standard error | 0.020 | 0.247 | 0.029 | 0.186 |
| 8 | extramural r&d dummy, using asm data |  |  |  |  |
| 9 | coefficient | -0.045 | -0.337 | -0.009 | 0.018 |
| 10 | standard error | 0.014 | 0.191 | 0.022 | 0.086 |
| 11 | relative extramural r&d intensity, using asm data |  |  |  |  |
| 12 | coefficient | -0.041 | 0.004 | -0.017 | -0.043 |
| 13 | standard error | 0.005 | 0.010 | 0.013 | 0.018 |
| 14 | foreign-owned |  |  |  |  |
| 15 | coefficient | 0.026 | -0.071 | 0.015 | -0.217 |
| 16 | standard error | 0.046 | 0.173 | 0.077 | 0.154 |
| 17 | age |  |  |  |  |
| 18 | coefficient | 0.001 | -0.005 | -0.002 | 0.003 |
| 19 | standard error | 0.001 | 0.010 | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| 20 | relative labour productivity |  |  |  |  |
| 21 | coefficient | 0.005 | 0.030 | 0.009 | 0.009 |
| 22 | standard error | 0.009 | 0.041 | 0.015 | 0.024 |
| 23 | relative employment |  |  |  |  |
| 24 | coefficient | 0.007 | -0.004 | -0.003 | 0.003 |
| 25 | standard error | 0.006 | 0.005 | 0.009 | 0.006 |
| 26 | number of observations | 16,843 | 576 | 16,843 | 576 |
| 27 | r-squared | 0.048 | 0.098 | 0.005 | 0.059 |
| 28 | adusted r-squared | 0.04670 | 0.05330 | 0.00361 | 0.01240 |

Question: what the two types of firms did the asm sample divide into?
Answer: small firms, large firms