| 1 | A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 2 | adjusted odds ratios for the association between respondent characteristics and place of residence on census day 2011, men aged 60 years or older, canada |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| 3 |  |  | nursing home |  |  | seniors' residence |  |  | private dwelling with additional family |  |  |
| 4 |  |  | odds ratio | 95% confidence interval |  | odds ratio | 95% confidence interval |  | odds ratio | 95% confidence interval |  |
| 5 |  |  |  | from | to |  | from | to |  | from | to |
| 6 | age group at census day | 60 to 69 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 1.3 | 1.0 | 1.6 |
| 7 |  | 70 to 74 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 2.0 | 0.9 | 0.7 | 1.2 |
| 8 |  | 75 to 79 | 1.0 |  |  | 1.0 |  |  | 1.0 |  |  |
| 9 |  | 80 to 84 | 1.2 | 0.8 | 1.9 | 3.5 | 1.9 | 6.5 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 1.1 |
| 10 |  | 85 to 89 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 4.7 | 9.8 | 5.2 | 18.6 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 0.9 |
| 11 |  | 90 and older | 6.3 | 4.0 | 9.9 | 19.4 | 10.0 | 37.8 | 0.9 | 0.6 | 1.4 |
| 12 | marital status, cchs & census | remained married | 1.0 |  |  | 1.0 |  |  | 1.0 |  |  |
| 13 |  | loss of spouse | 3.7 | 2.4 | 5.7 | 3.5 | 2.0 | 6.0 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 0.9 |
| 14 |  | not married at cchs | 2.4 | 1.2 | 4.8 | 2.7 | 1.3 | 5.8 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| 15 | living alone | living with others | 1.0 |  |  | 1.0 |  |  | 1.0 |  |  |
| 16 |  | living alone | 1.8 | 1.0 | 3.2 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 2.0 | 16.4 | 9.4 | 28.5 |
| 17 | dwelling owned by a household member | yes | 1.0 |  |  | 1.0 |  |  | 1.0 |  |  |
| 18 |  | no | 2.3 | 1.6 | 3.3 | 2.9 | 2.0 | 4.4 | 0.8 | 0.7 | 1.0 |
| 19 | self-perceived general health | excellent | 1.0 |  |  | 1.0 |  |  | 1.0 |  |  |
| 20 |  | very good | 0.8 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 1.4 | 1.0 | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| 21 |  | good | 1.3 | 0.7 | 2.4 | 0.8 | 0.4 | 1.6 | 0.9 | 0.7 | 1.1 |
| 22 |  | fair | 1.4 | 0.7 | 2.6 | 1.3 | 0.6 | 2.7 | 1.0 | 0.8 | 1.3 |
| 23 |  | poor | 2.3 | 1.1 | 4.9 | 1.1 | 0.4 | 3.0 | 1.1 | 0.6 | 1.8 |
| 24 | self-perceived mental health | excellent | 1.0 |  |  | 1.0 |  |  | 1.0 |  |  |
| 25 |  | very good | 1.6 | 1.1 | 2.3 | 1.5 | 0.9 | 2.5 | 1.1 | 0.9 | 1.3 |
| 26 |  | good | 1.6 | 1.0 | 2.4 | 1.1 | 0.7 | 1.8 | 1.0 | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| 27 |  | fair | 2.7 | 1.6 | 4.6 | 1.5 | 0.7 | 3.3 | 1.0 | 0.7 | 1.5 |
| 28 |  | poor | 6.0 | 2.2 | 16.3 | 1.3 | 0.0 | 55.5 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 2.0 |
| 29 |  | missing | 5.0 | 2.0 | 12.2 | 1.2 | 0.5 | 3.2 | 1.2 | 0.7 | 1.9 |
| 30 | province | atlantic provinces | 0.9 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 1.2 | 0.9 | 0.8 | 1.1 |
| 31 |  | quebec | 0.8 | 0.5 | 1.2 | 3.1 | 1.9 | 4.9 | 0.9 | 0.7 | 1.0 |
| 32 |  | ontario | 1.0 |  |  | 1.0 |  |  | 1.0 |  |  |
| 33 |  | manitoba | 0.6 | 0.3 | 1.2 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 1.5 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| 34 |  | saskatchewan | 1.1 | 0.7 | 1.8 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 1.3 | 1.1 | 0.8 | 1.5 |
| 35 |  | alberta | 0.9 | 0.5 | 1.4 | 2.6 | 1.4 | 4.6 | 1.1 | 0.8 | 1.4 |
| 36 |  | british columbia | 0.7 | 0.4 | 1.1 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 1.9 | 1.4 | 1.1 | 1.7 |
| 37 | immigrant status | canadian-born | 1.0 |  |  | 1.0 |  |  | 1.0 |  |  |
| 38 |  | immigrant | 0.7 | 0.4 | 1.1 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 1.2 | 1.0 | 1.4 |
| 39 | chronic conditions | diabetes | 1.1 | 0.8 | 1.7 | 1.8 | 1.2 | 2.8 | 1.2 | 0.9 | 1.5 |
| 40 |  | heart disease | 0.9 | 0.6 | 1.2 | 0.7 | 0.4 | 1.0 | 0.9 | 0.8 | 1.1 |
| 41 |  | dementia | 6.2 | 2.7 | 14.0 | 1.9 | 0.6 | 5.8 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 1.8 |
| 42 | overnight patient in a hospital, nursing home or convalescent home in past year | no | 1.0 |  |  | 1.0 |  |  | 1.0 |  |  |
| 43 |  | yes | 1.9 | 1.2 | 2.9 | 1.8 | 1.1 | 2.7 | 1.2 | 1.0 | 1.5 |
| 44 | smoking status | never smoker | 1.0 |  |  | 1.0 |  |  | 1.0 |  |  |
| 45 |  | former smoker | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.9 | 1.3 | 0.8 | 2.3 | 1.0 | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| 46 |  | current smoker | 0.6 | 0.3 | 1.2 | 1.4 | 0.7 | 2.6 | 1.0 | 0.8 | 1.3 |
| 47 | year of interview | 2005/2006 | 1.6 | 1.2 | 2.3 | 1.5 | 1.0 | 2.5 | 1.2 | 1.0 | 1.4 |
| 48 |  | 2007 | 1.0 |  |  | 1.0 |  |  | 1.0 |  |  |
| 49 |  | 2008 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 1.3 | 1.1 | 0.6 | 1.9 | 1.1 | 0.9 | 1.4 |
| 50 |  | 2009 | 0.7 | 0.4 | 1.1 | 0.9 | 0.5 | 1.6 | 1.1 | 0.9 | 1.4 |

Question: were men living in british columbia more likely to live in a pdaf or were men living in ontario?
Answer: british columbia