Table S.5: Descriptive statistics by demobilization status

# (a) Dependent variables in 2006

||Civilians|CNDD||FNL||||_p_-va|luejoint|tests|||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
||[A]|Non-Demob.<br>[B]|Demob.<br>[C]|Non-Demob.<br>[D]|Demob.<br>[E]|(1)|(2)|(3)|(4)|(5)|(6)|(7)|
|Total Consumption|15973<br>(471)|18375|21063|15514|10759|0.351|0.129|0.89|0.436|0.214|0.946|0.438|
|Consumption expenditure|8672<br>(519)|12317|8581|9219|8495|0.292|0.032|0.818|0.299|0.519|0.101|0.736|
|Consumption from stocks|7141<br>(390)|6058|12452|6296|2248|0|0.569|0.501|0.918|0.001|0.053|0.193|
|Nonfood spending|20051<br>(2341)|41374|33905|22226|18239|0.32|0.293|0.781|0.364|0.847|0.466|0.704|
|TLU|0.113<br>(0.008)|0.119|0.186|0.151|0|0.489|0.883|0.561|0.688|0.591|0.604|0.743|

# (b) Socio-demographic characteristics in 2006

||Civilians|CNDD||FNL||||_p_-val|uejoint|tests<br>|||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
||[A]|Non-Demob.<br>[B]|Demob.<br>[C]|Non-Demob.<br>[D]|Demob.<br>[E]|(1)|(2)|(3)|(4)|(5)|(6)|(7)|
|Age|42.3<br>(0.7)|37.1|40.8|37.6|43.2|0.099|0.082|0.058|0.879|0.749|0.197|0.075|
|No schooling (%)|0.35<br>(0.02)|0.16|0.2|0.41|0.46|0.282|0.033|0.717|0.16|0.973|0.322|0.993|
|Primary schooling (%)|0.39<br>(0.02)|0.78|0.78|0.4|0.34|0.001|0|0.893|0.018|0.821|0.107|0.812|
|Secondary schooling (%)|0.26<br>(0.02)|0.06|0.01|0.19|0.2|0|0|0.441|0.232|0.761|0.158|0.699|
|Single (%)|0.02<br>(0.01)|0|-0.01|0|0.06|0.001|0|0|1|0.317|0.278|0.139|
|Married (%)|0.81<br>(0.03)|0.89|1.04|0.74|0.62|0|0.329|0.607|0.316|0.365|0.675|0.874|
|Divorced (%)|0.02<br>(0.01)|0|0|0|0|0.006|0.001|0.001||0.354|0.002|0.001|
|Widow (%)|0.15<br>(0.02)|0.11|-0.03|0.26|0.32|0|0.621|0.402|0.316|0.517|0.504|0.894|

# (c) Dependent variables in 2010

||Civilians|CNDD||FNL||||_p_-va|luejoint|tests|||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
||[A]|Non-Demob.<br>[B]|Demob.<br>[C]|Non-Demob.<br>[D]|Demob.<br>[E]|(1)|(2)|(3)|(4)|(5)|(6)|(7)|
|Total Consumption|14008<br>(485)|14765|11551|14666|18884|0.123|0.745|0.774|0.975|0.093|0.468|0.507|
|Consumption expenditure|7903<br>(362)|11056|3600|9297|11882|0|0.165|0.441|0.552|0.003|0.026|0.757|
|Consumption from stocks|6164<br>(386)|6560|7962|6156|7008|0.974|0.839|0.997|0.887|0.889|0.835|0.865|
|Nonfood spending|36118<br>(2921)|60043|8309|23829|71957|0.002|0.229|0.052|0.085|0.027|0.073|0.08|
|TLU|0.096<br>(0.007)|0.107|0.151|0.031|0|0.003|0.857|0|0.223|0.717|0.689|0.046|
|N|[920,978]|[20,22]|[16,17]|[6,7]|[10,11]||||||||

_Notes:_ Authors’ analysis based on data described in the text. Clustered-robust standard errors are in parentheses. Outliers are excluded (as explained in Appendix B.1). Sampling weights are accounted for. Test (1) is a joint test that the means of the nondemobilized and demobilized of both groups are equal to the mean of the civilians ([A]=[B]=[C]=[D]=[E]). Test (2) compares the mean of the CNDD nondemobilized with the mean of civilians ([A]=[B]). Test (3) compares the mean of the FNL nondemobilized with the mean of civilians ([A]=[D]). Test (4) compares the means across nondemobilized ([B]=[D]). Test (5) compares the means across demobilized ([C]=[E]). Test (6) compares the nondemobilized and the demobilized within the CNDD+ ([B]=[C]), while test (7) compares the nondemobilized and the demobilized within the FNL ([D]=[E]). The number of households in each group is in square brackets. It may vary as outliers or missing values are not taken into account when computing the means and standard deviations.