52

# Table 10: Top 25 non-OECD institutions in health economics based on _h_ -index

||Institution|Country|% not<br>found in<br>Google<br>Scholar|_I_<sup>3</sup> =0<br>Publication<br>count|Rank|_I_<sup>3</sup> =0.5|Rank|_I_<sup>3</sup> =1<br>Total<br>citations|Rank|_h_-index<br>(_I_<sup>1</sup>)|Rank|_I_<sup>2</sup><br>QIF|Rank|Maximum<br>citations|Rank|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|1|Nat Taiwan U|Taiwan<br>|16%|32|150|97|147|563|150|12|141|0.257|151|89|214|
|||(China)||||||||||||||
|2|U Witwatersrand|<br>South Africa|32%|25|185|57|216|246|243|11|149|0.113|244|51|351|
|3|Chinese U Hong Kong|China|22%|23|200|64|196|394|186|10|168|0.180|187|104|183|
|4|<br>U Cape Town|South Africa|18%|34|144|73|185|241|247|9|186|0.110|247|32|453|
|5|<br>Academia Sinica|Taiwan<br>(China)|46%|24|191|47|248|219|264|8|217|0.100|262|42|396|
|5|Peking U|<br>China|17%|23|200|46|252|194|290|8|217|0.089|290|66|291|
|5|U Hong Kong|China|19%|21|210|34|316|114|389|8|217|0.052|389|26|482|
|5|<br>U Nairobi|Kenya|7%|14|309|28|362|75|459|8|217|0.034|459|14|614|
|9|Nat U Singapore|<br>Singapore|23%|26|174|35|313|122|379|7|248|0.056|379|25|493|
|10|Internatl Rice Res Inst|Philippines|14%|7|499|37|297|291|221|6|294|0.132|222|157|121|
|10|U Chile|Chile|13%|15|289|32|327|104|405|6|294|0.048|406|24|504|
|10|U Delhi|India|21%|14|309|31|338|137|356|6|294|0.063|356|63|308|
|10|U KwaZulu-Natal|South Africa|20%|20|223|36|307|146|344|6|294|0.067|344|68|286|
|14|Pakistan Inst of Dev Econ|Pakistan|19%|27|165|32|331|69|479|5|349|0.032|479|11|647|
|14|U Sao Paulo|Brazil|33%|15|289|22|425|76|457|5|349|0.035|457|30|461|
|14|U Stellenbosch|South Africa|0%|10|393|19|462|52|519|5|349|0.024|519|15|607|
|14|U West Indies|West Indies|59%|17|255|15|516|47|538|5|349|0.022|538|17|584|
|18|Indian Inst of Management|India|0%|5|619|21|440|120|380|4|429|0.055|381|82|234|
|18|<br>Koc U|Turkey|0%|6|541|31|333|308|215|4|429|0.139|216|201|89|
|18|Makerere U|<br>Uganda|17%|6|541|7|664|13|685|4|429|0.006|687|7|682|
|18|Nanyang Technological U|Singapore|0%|8|456|17|489|46|541|4|429|0.021|541|16|596|
|18|Nat Cheng-Chi U|Taiwan<br>(China)|41%|17|255|18|468|50|528|4|429|0.023|529|19|562|
|18|Nat Coun of Appl Econ Res|<br>India|17%|6|541|10|616|24|644|4|429|0.011|644|8|671|
|18|<br>Nat Tsing Hua U|Taiwan<br>|0%|5|619|16|504|73|467|4|429|0.033|469|43|388|
|||(China)||||||||||||||
|18|Pontificia U Catolica de Chile|<br>Chile|13%|8|456|16|497|62|496|4|429|0.028|497|24|504|
|18|U Buenos Aires|Argentina|13%|8|456|16|500|70|475|4|429|0.032|476|23|522|
|18|U Philippines|Philippines|18%|11|370|25|398|107|402|4|429|0.049|403|58|331|

Notes: Note: The starting point was our database of 33,000 publications in EconLit with a health JEL code. Google Scholar citation data were obtained for as many as possible (80 percent) in June 2011. Each listed institution was given full credit for a publication in the case of a co-authored publication, but only the first institution was credited where an author listed multiple institutions. Institutional affiliations below the institution level were aggregated up to the level of the institution, so that for example publications originating from the Harvard School of Public Health were allocated to Harvard University along with publications originating from the Department of Economics at Harvard University. As explained in the text, only addresses with five or more articles to their name were retained for cleaning and aggregating. Institutions were then assigned a country. An _h_ - index of 10 means that the author has 10 publications to his or her name each of which has been cited at least 10 times. The quadratic influence function is defined in eqn (1). The measure _I_<sup>3</sup> is defined in eqn (2). The final rank column denotes the global rank among all institutions.