|ala<br>(9)<br>0.115_∗∗∗_<br>(0.0421)<br>41.30<br>0.673<br>0.389<br>0.0950_∗∗_<br>(0.0450)<br>47.23<br>0.598<br>0.339<br>0.0725_∗∗_<br>(0.0300)<br>48.24<br>0.782<br>0.359<br>853<br>All<br>ampala.<br>ozhukov<br>useholds<br> 7), and<br>together<br>tered at|
|---|
|le = Kamp<br>(8)<br>0.111_∗_<br>(0.0596)<br>34.09<br>0.389<br>0.0970_∗∗_<br>(0.0489)<br>41.71<br>0.360<br>0.0830_∗_<br>(0.0462)<br>42.94<br>0.359<br>853<br>_IHH_, _In_<br>stricted to K<br>hod of Chern<br> and host ho<br>olumns 1, 4, <br>instruments <br>eses are clus<br>** _p <_0_._01.|
|_fugees_<br>Samp<br>(7)<br>0.122_∗∗_<br>(0.0520)<br>26.14<br>0.388<br>0.0957_∗∗_<br>(0.0488)<br>21.49<br>0.339<br>0.0508_∗∗_<br>(0.0249)<br>23.48<br>0.358<br>853<br>% refugees<br>mns (7-9) are re<br>ble LASSO met<br>ehold members <br>ondents’ EA (C<br>nsider the two <br>rrors in parenth<br>, ** _p <_0_._05, *|
|_eptions of re_<br>vale<br>(6)<br>-0.0136<br>(0.0234)<br>161.8<br>0.453<br>0.320<br>-0.0378<br>(0.0344)<br>156.0<br>0.673<br>0.316<br>-0.0233<br>(0.0255)<br>177.4<br>0.954<br>0.297<br>647<br>All<br>ment and Colu<br> using the dou<br>ng other hous<br>s living in resp<br>8). We also co<br>on. Standard e<br>d by * _p <_0_._1|
|_hosts’ perc_<br>ple = Naki<br>(5)<br>0.000971<br>(0.0281)<br>140.3<br>0.323<br>-0.0394<br>(0.0350)<br>155.7<br>0.304<br>-0.0210<br>(0.0314)<br>140.3<br>0.298<br>647<br>_IHH_, _In_<br>akivale settle<br> list selected <br>n index amo<br>on of refugee<br>lumns 2, 5, <br> interpretati<br>s are indicate|
|_dent variable: _<br>Sam<br>(4)<br>-0.0698<br>(0.0571)<br>10.94<br>0.307<br>-0.140<br>(0.127)<br>7.641<br>0.278<br>-0.0308<br>(0.0228)<br>12.51<br>0.295<br>647<br>% refugees<br>stricted to the N<br>A.3 (Panel A), a<br>of the perceptio<br> 1) the proporti<br> neighbours (Co<br>ized to facilitate<br>ignifcance level|
|_Depen_<br>nda<br>(3)<br>0.0183<br>(0.0216)<br>136.3<br>0.453<br>0.350<br>0.0237<br>(0.0219)<br>136.1<br>0.385<br>0.338<br>0.0174<br>(0.0204)<br>141.2<br>0.733<br>0.333<br>1500<br>All<br>mns 4-6 are re<br>ned in Table <br> the averages <br>o instruments: <br> members and <br>s are standard<br>er sampling. S|
|ple = Uga<br>(2)<br>0.0268<br>(0.0263)<br>133.3<br>0.351<br> **Lasso**<br>0.0350<br>(0.0270)<br>137.8<br>0.340<br>0.0252<br>(0.0258)<br>137.4<br>0.334<br>1500<br>_IHH_, _In_<br>sample, Colu<br> long list def<br>ables except <br> consider tw<br>r household <br>action indice<br>o-stage clust|
|Sam<br>(1)<br>**Panel A - Controls listed in table A.2**<br>Interaction index<br>-0.00592<br>(0.0278)<br>Efective F-Statistic<br>26.63<br>Hansen J statistic (p-value)<br>R-squared<br>0.347<br>**Panel B - Controls selected with double**<br>Interaction index<br>-0.0113<br>(0.0198)<br>Efective F-Statistic<br>29.87<br>Hansen J statistic (p-value)<br>R-squared<br>0.333<br>**Panel C - No controls**<br>Interaction index<br>-0.00486<br>(0.0174)<br>Efective F-Statistic<br>30.78<br>Hansen J statistic (p-value)<br>R-squared<br>0.330<br>Observations<br>1500<br>Instruments<br>% refugees<br>Notes: Columns 1-3 consider the full Uganda<br>We consider three sets of control variables: a<br>et al. (2017) (Panel B), and no control vari<br>living in the same community (Panel C). We<br>2) the average interaction index among othe<br>(Columns 3, 6, 9). The perception and inter<br>the enumeration area level to account for tw|

39