Table S2.4: EFFECTS ON MATCHING, REPORTED BY NON-ULTRA-POOR HOUSEHOLDS

||(1)|(2)|(3)|(4)|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|_Transfers received by Non-Ultra-Poor from ..._|ultra|other|middle|upper|
||poor|poor|class|class|
|_Panel A1: Pooled_|||||
|Treatment|0.018***|0.009|-0.010|-0.010|
||(0.004)|(0.009)|(0.012)|(0.008)|
|Treatment_×_Endline|0.009*<br>|0.005<br>|0.020<br>|0.005<br>|
||(0.005)|(0.011)|(0.018)|(0.012)|
|_Panel A2: By Wealth Class_|||||
|Treatment|0.038***|0.004|0.003|0.010|
||(0.007)|(0.014)|(0.013)|(0.011)|
|Treatment_×_Endline|0.001|0.006|0.000|-0.005|
||(0.008)|(0.018)|(0.016)|(0.013)|
|Differential effect by endline for middle class|0.012|0.004|0.020|0.006|
||(0.008)|(0.016)|(0.019)|(0.016)|
|Differential effect by endline for uppper class|0.016|0.002|0.027|0.047**|
||(0.010)|(0.019)|(0.030)|(0.022)|
|Treatment effect for middle class|0.019|0.008|-0.005|-0.001|
||(0.006)|(0.009)|(0.014)|(0.009)|
|Treatment effect for upper class|0.004|-0.001|-0.039|-0.062|
||(0.005)|(0.011)|(0.029)|(0.024)|
|Control mean|0.062|0.319|0.691|0.279|
|Mean for other poor|0.085|0.448|0.711|0.272|
|<br>Mean for middle class|0.048|0.224|0.770|0.261|
|Mean for upper class|0.017|0.128|0.385|0.360|
|Observations|32594|32594|32594|32594|
|_Transfers given by Non-Ultra-Poor to ..._|ultra|other|middle|upper|
||poor|poor|class|class|
|_Panel B1: Pooled_|||||
|Treatment|0.025***|-0.014|-0.019|-0.016|
||(0.007)|(0.013)|(0.020)|(0.009)|
|Treatment_×_Endline|-0.001|0.006|0.016|0.028*|
||(0.008)|(0.016)|(0.025)|(0.014)|
|_Panel B2: By Wealth Class_|||||
|Treatment|0.030***|-0.008|-0.013|-0.013|
||(0.009)|(0.017)|(0.022)|(0.010)|
|Treatment_×_Endline|0.002|0.012|0.003|0.015|
||(0.009)|(0.024)|(0.026)|(0.011)|
|Differential effect by endline for middle class|-0.001|-0.009|0.012|0.011|
||(0.011)|(0.021)|(0.026)|(0.015)|
|Differential effect by endline for uppper class|0.001|-0.006|0.017|0.028|
||(0.015)|(0.026)|(0.031)|(0.024)|
|Treatment effect for middle class|0.026|-0.014|-0.026|-0.014|
||(0.008)|(0.013)|(0.024)|(0.010)|
|Treatment effect for upper class|0.015|-0.030|-0.010|-0.016|
||(0.015)|(0.021)|(0.026)|(0.018)|
|Control mean|0.078|0.338|0.600|0.177|
|Mean for other poor|0.084|0.397|0.507|0.119|
|<br>Mean for middle class|0.065|0.268|0.721|0.182|
|Mean for uer class|0091|0329|0584|0373|
|pp<br>Observations|.<br>32594|.<br>32594|.<br>32594|.<br>32594|

**Source:** Author’s analysis based on original survey data. **Notes:** The table reports ITT estimates based on specification (2), with the addition of indicators for wealth classes and their interactions with treatment and endline indicators, estimated with OLS. The sample includes observations from non-ultrapoor households. All specifications control for the baseline level of the outcome, survey wave and subdistrict (strata) fixed effects. Standard errors are clustered at the BRAC branch office level (unit of randomization). *** (**) (*) indicates significance at the 1% (5%) (10%) level. In Panel A, the dependent variables in columns 1, 2, 3 and 4 are dummy variables equal to 1 if the respondent reported that her household received any transfers from any ultra-poor, other poor, middle class or upper class households (within her community) respectively. In Panel B, the dependent variables in columns 1, 2, 3 and 4 are dummy variables equal to 1 if the respondent reported that her household gave any transfers to any ultra-poor, other poor, middle class or upper class households (within her community) respectively. In the pooled regressions (Panels A1 and B1) each observation is weighted using sampling weights calculated as the fraction of households surveyed from each wealth class (lower, middle and upper) relative to the number of households from the relevant wealth class in the community census.

15