Table 2: Long-differenced estimations of the impact of GQ improvements, comparing 2009 to 2000, interacted with initial conditions

||||Young|||||Mature|||||Old|||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|DV-Loggedvaluesof|Output|Avg.<br> plantsize <br>(emp.)|Avg.<br> plantsize <br>(output)|veduceit<br>P|y TFPR<br>.|Output|Avg.<br> plantsize <br>(emp.)|Avg.<br> plantsize<br>(output)|voduetity<br>P<br>.|TFPR|Output|Avg.<br> plantsize <br>(emp.)|Avg.<br> plantsize <br>(output)|vodacenit<br>p|y TFPR<br>.|
|||A. Base|<br>OLS estimat|<br>ionthat excl|udes nodal dist|ricts andmeas|ures effects|relativeto di|stricts 10-50|kmfromthe|GQ network|||||
|(0.1) District 0-10kmfromGQ|0.7017+|=<br>=0.311+|= -0.643++|0.4097+|= 0.239++|0.358|-0.139|0.027|0.032|-0.014|0.335|-0.013|0.012|0.157|0.048|
||(0.290)|(0.185)|(0.272)|(0.179)|(0.120)|(0.333)|(0.172)|(0.253)|(0.150)|(0.088)|(0.273)|(0.161)|(0.207)|(0.144)|(0.082)|
|||||B. Panel|Awithinterac|tion splitusin|gmedian ofd|istrictinfrast|ructure index|||||||
|(0,1) District0-10kmfromGQ|0.746++|=0.402+|0.554+|0.208|0.090|0.264|-0.047|0.012|-0.108|0.083|0.215|-0.045|-0.147|-0.005|0.094|
|<br>Abovemedian|(0.342)|<br>(0.208)|(0.307)|(0.178)|(0.132)|(0.325)|(0.176)|(0.261)|(0.150)|(0.082)|(0.309)|(0.182)|(0.228)|(0.146)|(0.086)|
|(0.1) District0-10kmfromGQ|0.673+|0.228|0.774++|0.65274+|90.422+7++|0.394|-0.249|0.025|0.188|-0.116|0.444|-0.023|0.162|0.337+|0.004|
|<br>Medianvalue and below|(0.373)|(0.264)|(0.348)|(0.235)|<br>(0.154)|(0.471)|(0.244)|(0.339)|(0.214)|(0.129)|(0.345)|(0.211)|(0.267)|(0.190)|(0.109)|
|||||C.|PanelAwith|interaction spli|tusingmedi|an ofdistrictl|iteracy|||||||
|(0.1) District0-10kmfromGQ|0.749++|0.332|0.602++|0.341+|0.051|0.818++|0.251|0.491+|0.095|-0.033|0.687++|0.133|0.262|0.208|0.156+|
|<br>Abovemedian|(0.363)|(0.215)|(0.301)|(0.175)|(0.120)|(0.370)|(0.193)|(0.272)|(0.138)|(0.093)|(0.295)|(0.176)|(0.195)|(0.135)|(0.085)|
|(0,1)District0-10kmfromGQ|0.919+|=0.403+=|0.872+++|=0.5144|=0.463+4+|0.256|-0.377|-0.184|0.043|-0.054|0.403|-0.174|-0.068|0.221|-0.021|
|<br>Medianvalueand below|<br>(0.334)|<br>(0.228)|<br>(0.312)|<br>(0.213)|<br>(0.142)|(0.444)|(0.232)|(0.332)|(0.193)|(0.120)|(0.358)|(0.209)|(0.280)|(0.185)|(0.108)|
|||||D. PanelA|with interactio|n splitusingm|edian ofdist|rict distance|fromnodal ci|ties||||||
|(0.1) District0-10kmfromGQ|0.781+|0.360|0.775++|0.543++|=0.444+>|0.113|-0.351|-0.107|0.032|0.044|0.291|0.063|0.096|0.235|-0.014|
|<br>Abovemedian|(0.405)|(0.262)|(0.352)|(0.241)|<br>(0.180)|(0.436)|(0.242)|(0.360)|(0.226)|(0.154)|(0.284)|(0.203)|(0.273)|(0.189)|(0.117)|
|(0,1) District 0-10kmfromGQ|0.661-+|0.288|0.582++|0.344+|= 0.146|0.473|-0.044|0.087|0.032|-0.037|0.354|-0.047|-0.027|0.123|0.074|
|Medianvalueandbelow|(0.312)|(0.201)|(0.294)|(0.183)|(0.124)|(0.379)|(0.187)|(0.266)|(0.155)|(0.093)|(0.320)|(0.185)|(0.228)|(0.148)|(0.088)|
|||E. Pan|elAwith in|teraction spli|tusingmedian|ofdistrict acc|ess tobanki|ng services (|% Household|s with access|to Bank)|||||
|(0,1)District0-10kmfromGQ|0.827++|0.436++|=0.741++|0.434++|=0.329+++|0.384|-0.018|0.084|-0.037|0.038|0.444|0.068|0.169|0.159|0.114|
|<br>Abovemedian|(0.340)|(0.218)|<br>(0.340)|(0.216)|<br>(0.118)|(0.315)|(0.206)|(0.260)|(0.155)|(0.097)|(0.311)|(0.181)|(0.222)|(0.151)|(0.098)|
|(0,1) District0-10kmfromGQ|0.596|0.208|0.561+|0.387+|0.160|0.337|-0.243|-0.022|0.099|-0.066|0.242|-0.081|-0.121|0.155|-0.012|
|<br>Medianvalue and below|(0.366)|(0.230)|(0.300)|(0.197)|(0.163)|(0.489)|(0.230)|(0.349)|(0.202)|(0.118)|(0.333)|(0.203)|(0.259)|(0.179)|(0.099)|
|||||F. Pane|lAwith intera|ction splitusin|gmedian of|district popula|tion density|||||||
|(0,1) District0-10kmfromGQ|0.713++|0.442++|= 0.774++|0.360+|0.254+|0.185|-0.217|-0.131|-0.043|-0.067|0.420|0.149|0.160|0.172|0.057|
|Abovemedian|(0.332)|(0.212)|(0.305)|(0.208)|(0.142)|(0.357)|(0.203)|(0.283)|(0.164)|(0.101)|(0.266)|(0.164)|(0.203)|(0.145)|(0.087)|
|(0,1) District0-10kmfromGQ|0.682+|0.112|0.439|0.488++|0.210|0.630|-0.020|0.272|0.143|0.079|0.200|-0.267|-0.221|0.132|0.029|
|<br>Medianvalue and below|(0.360)|(0.232)|(0.335)|(0.188)|(0.133)|(0.501)|(0.231)|(0.335)|(0.193)|(0.122)|(0.428)|(0.239)|(0.317)|(0.203)|(0.129)|
|||||G. P|anelA within|teraction split|usingmedia|n ofdistrictT|FP level|||||||
|(0,1) District0-10kmfromGQ|0.888+++|=0.481++<br>|=0.815+++|0.374+|=0.289+|0.499|-0.085|0.091|0.020|0.012|0.288|0.109|-0.045|0.004|-0.001|
|<br>Above median|(0.311)|(0.210)|<br>(0.310)|(0.205)|<br>(0.148)|(0.424)|(0.205)|(0.292)|(0.171)|(0.110)|(0.323)|(0.197)|(0.243)|(0.160)|(0.101)|
|(0,1) District0-10kmfromGQ|0.488|0.126|0.458|0.448++|0.184|0.200|-0.199|-0.044|0.046|-0.044|0.385|-0.144|0.073|0.330++|0.103|
|<br>Medianvalueand below|(0.382)|(0.233)|(0.323)|(0.202)|(0.137)|(0.370)|(0.208)|(0.304)|(0.177)|(0.098)|(0.310)|(0.187)|(0.236)|(0.158)|(0.088)|

Notes: See Table 1. Long-differenced estimations consider changes in the location and productivity of organized-sector manufacturing activity in 106 non- nodal districts located within 0-50 km of GQ for the time period starting from 2000 to 2009 from the Annual Survey of Industries (ASI). Panel (a) repeats the base estimation for this group. In panels (B)-{L). the base effect is interacted with indicator variables for above or below median values for indicated district traits. Estimation controls for unreported main effects of district traits. District level access to infrastructure, literacy, access to banking, population density is extracted from 2001 census, while distance from nodal cities to district is computed from district edge using India's district level GIS maps. Lastly, initial TFP is plant-level TFP for the year 2000-01 computed following LP-Sivadasan methodology on ASI data. misallocation matrices are computed using the methodology proposed in Duranton et al. (2015a).