I POLIcY RESEARCH WORKING PAPER 1277

# Summary findings

Between World War II and the early 1970s, Tanzania developed one of the world's largest cashew nut industries. In 1973-74, marketed production reached 145,000 tone (about 30 percent of world production), with cashews providing an important source of income to some 250,000 farmers and being the country's fourth largest source of foreign exchange. This trade was originally developed and organized by private traders (of Indian and Arab origin), although in the 1960s a - multitiered marketing system involving local cooperative societies, regional cooperative unions, and a - marketing board was imposed, with private traders gradually removed from the marketing system.

Despite a buoyant international market, Tanzania's cashew nut industry underwent a steady and massive decline through the 1970s and 1980s. Jaffee examines the factors that contributed to this downward spin: Tanzania's villagization program, a decline in real producer prices, and inefficiencies in cooperative and marketing board crop collection and downstream activities. With the decline in production, living standards in the main cashew-growing regions worsened, and most of the large-scale, donor-funded, governmentowned processing factories became "white elephants." With the industry on the brink of collapse, in 1991 the government announced the liberalization of the cashew nut market, permitting private firms to once again buy and sell the nuts. According to Jaffee, the reform process has been characterized by confusion, uncertainty, and latent government controls and interventions, though the industry shows some signs of recovery. Based on a recent - survey, Jaffee examines the liberalization process including its implementation at the national and local levels, the private sector response to renewed trading opportunities, and the resultant patterns of competition, price discovery, and marketing channel formation.

The liberalization experience in Tanzania's cashew n industry offers interesting insights for other Sub-Saharan African countries where uncertainty remains about the appropriate roles (if any) for marketing boards in liberalized markets, about the ability of cooperatives to compete in such markets, and about the ability of indigenous firms to take advantage of the new trading opportunities.

In Tanzania, neither the cooperatives nor the marketing board have fared well in the liberalized market. Although a relatively large number of private traders have recently entered into cashew buying and selling, successful entry into export marketing has prov viable only for a small number of companies. Their characteristics: medium to large in scale, diversified across commodities, involved in trading and agroindustry, not indigenous, and with strong financial and trading links abroad.

This paper - a product of the Agricultural Policies Division, Agriculture and Natural Resources Department - is part a larger effort in the department to assess the division of responsibilities between the public and the private sector providing agricultural services and agricultural marketing activities. Copies of the paper are available free from the World Bank, 1818 H Street NW, Washington, DC 20433. Please contact Cicely Spooner, room N8-041, extension 32116 (42 pages). March 1994.

_The Policy Research Working Paper Se.Ses disseminates the findings of work in progress to encourage the exchange of ideas about development issues. An objective of the series is to get the findings out quickly, even if the presentations are less than fully polished. The papers carry the names of the authors and should be_ **_used and_** _cited accordingly. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions are the authors'_ **_oun_** _and should not be attributed to the World Bank, its Executive Board of Directors, or any of its member_ **_countries._** Produced by the Fciicy Research Dissemination Center