|Tropical<br>estock<br>(10)<br>0.015<br>(0.053)<br>-0.065∗∗∗<br>(0.020)<br>-0.032<br>(0.038)<br>0.102∗<br>(0.053)<br>-0.899∗∗∗<br>(0.053)<br>0.001<br>(0.037)<br>No<br>Yes<br>0.495<br>952<br>.39<br>.21<br>household.<br>d matches.<br>for colline<br>cation, and<br>d errors are<br>h CNDD+|
|---|
|∆Log<br>Liv<br>(9)<br>0.014<br>(0.047)<br>-0.068∗∗∗<br>(0.019)<br>-0.013<br>(0.041)<br>0.098∗∗<br>(0.046)<br>-0.001∗<br>(0.001)<br>0.002∗∗∗<br>(0.001)<br>-0.878∗∗∗<br>(0.050)<br>0.003<br>(0.028)<br>Yes<br>No<br>0.504<br>952<br>.3<br>.18<br>vation is a<br>f-reports an<br>ad controls<br>status, edu<br>ust standar<br>ociated wit|
|nonfood<br>g per AE<br>(8)<br>0.082<br>(0.450)<br>-0.116<br>(0.357)<br>-1.549∗<br>(0.843)<br>1.529∗∗∗<br>(0.433)<br>-0.810∗∗∗<br>(0.054)<br>8.072∗∗∗<br>(0.555)<br>No<br>Yes<br>0.480<br>850<br>.96<br>.99<br>t of obser<br>ecked sel<br>umns inste<br>rimonial <br>stered-rob<br>cients ass|
|∆Log<br>spendin<br>(7)<br>0.181<br>(0.404)<br>-0.261<br>(0.317)<br>-1.158∗<br>(0.684)<br>1.593∗∗∗<br>(0.424)<br>-0.042∗∗∗<br>(0.012)<br>0.031∗∗∗<br>(0.006)<br><br>-0.837∗∗∗<br>(0.040)<br>8.393∗∗∗<br>(0.414)<br>Yes<br>No<br>0.442<br>850<br>.87<br>.51<br>tes. The uni<br>2<br>)): cross-ch<br>maining col<br>ex, age, mat<br>ted for. Clu<br>her the coef<br><0.01|
|ons. from<br>per AE<br>(6)<br>-0.253<br>(0.264)<br>-0.567<br>(0.415)<br>0.075<br>(0.472)<br>0.722<br>(0.449)<br>-0.883∗∗∗<br>(0.044)<br>7.014∗∗∗<br>(0.482)<br>No<br>Yes<br>0.506<br>786<br>.09<br>.21<br>LS estima<br>and_DFNL_<br>_i_<br>on), the re<br>ged, his s<br>are accoun<br>sing whet<br>5, *** _p_|
|∆Log c<br>stocks<br>(5)<br>-0.007<br>(0.270)<br>-0.394<br>(0.417)<br>-0.059<br>(0.503)<br>0.894∗<br>(0.486)<br>-0.016<br>(0.013)<br>0.013<br>(0.010)<br>-0.889∗∗∗<br>(0.041)<br>7.336∗∗∗<br>(0.505)<br>Yes<br>No<br>0.481<br>786<br>.42<br>.24<br>e reports O<br>(_DCNDD_+2<br>_i_<br>rk regressi<br> head chan<br>g weights<br>-tests asses<br>** _p_<0.0|
|cons.<br>res per AE<br>(4)<br>-0.036<br>(0.180)<br>0.163<br>(0.200)<br>-0.463∗<br>(0.267)<br>0.242<br>(0.240)<br>-0.928∗∗∗<br>(0.035)<br>8.671∗∗∗<br>(0.341)<br>No<br>Yes<br>0.469<br>974<br>.63<br>.51<br>t. The tabl<br>ombatants<br>s (benchma<br> household <br>x). Samplin<br>values of F<br>* _p_<0.10,|
|∆Log<br>expenditu<br>(3)<br>0.069<br>(0.164)<br>0.158<br>(0.217)<br>-0.775∗∗∗<br>(0.256)<br>0.510∗∗<br>(0.246)<br>-0.020∗∗<br>(0.008)<br>0.020∗∗∗<br>(0.004)<br>-0.833∗∗∗<br>(0.040)<br>7.366∗∗∗<br>(0.352)<br>Yes<br>No<br>0.433<br>974<br>.42<br>.42<br>d in the tex<br>bilized ex-c<br>fxed efect<br>hether the <br>n Appendi<br>port the p-<br>osite sign.|
|og total<br>tion per AE<br>(2)<br>-0.012<br>(0.151)<br>-0.019<br>(0.199)<br>-0.515∗∗<br>(0.210)<br>0.469∗<br>(0.263)<br>_nhab.)_<br>-0.866∗∗∗<br>(0.055)<br>8.034∗∗∗<br>(0.569)<br>No<br>Yes<br>0.409<br>958<br>.90<br>.87<br>ata describe<br>ion of demo<br>de province<br> violence, w<br>s explained i<br>table, we re<br>, but of opp|
|∆L<br>consump<br>(1)<br>_Ex-combatant return in HH_<br>CNDD+factions (_RCNDD_+<br>_i_<br>)<br>0.068<br>(0.143)<br>FNL factions (_RFNL_<br>_i_<br>)<br>-0.016<br>(0.201)<br>_Demobilized in HH_<br>CNDD+factions (_DCNDD_+<br>_i_<br>)<br>-0.588∗∗∗<br>(0.194)<br>FNL factions (_DFNL_<br>_i_<br>)<br>0.572∗∗<br>(0.250)<br>_# of demobilized in the hill (per 1000 i_<br>CNDD+factions (_S CNDD_+<br>_i_<br>)<br>-0.015∗∗<br>(0.007)<br>FNL factions (_S FNL_<br>_i_<br>)<br>0.013∗∗∗<br>(0.004)<br>_Lag_<br>Lagged dependent variable<br>-0.842∗∗∗<br>(0.047)<br>Constant<br>7.705∗∗∗<br>(0.500)<br>Province FE<br>Yes<br>Colline FE<br>No<br>_R_2<br>0.399<br>Observations<br>958<br>F-test (η1 =−β1) _p_-value<br>.84<br>F-test (η2 =−β2) _p_-value<br>.96<br>_Notes:_ Authors’ analysis based on d<br>This table relies on the second defnit<br>Odd-numbered columns do not inclu<br>fxed efects. Controls include past <br>occupation. Outliers are excluded (a<br>in parentheses. At the bottom of the<br>and FNL variables are of similar size|

42