|(8)<br>N. HHs<br>290<br>294<br>290<br>294<br>294<br>294<br>294<br>294<br>294<br>294<br>167<br>s and stan-<br>outcome of<br>useholds in<br>gned inter-<br>outcome at<br>pality fxed<br>ectively.|
|---|
|(7)<br>N. Obs<br>480<br>484<br>480<br>484<br>484<br>484<br>484<br>484<br>484<br>484<br>279<br>coeffcient<br> _Yict_ is the<br>argeted ho<br>om the assi<br>alue of the<br>des munici<br>nd 1%, resp|
|(6)<br>∆_Sx_**TC**<br>Coef.<br>(s.e.)<br>-0.001<br>(0.002)<br>0.008<br>(0.005)<br>-0.001<br>(0.002)<br>-0.000<br>(0.007)<br>0.004<br>(0.006)<br>0.004<br>(0.005)<br>-0.000<br>(0.006)<br>-0.006<br>(0.006)<br>0.002<br>(0.007)<br>0.063<br>(0.052)<br>0.505<br>(0.443)<br>report the<br> _εict_, where<br>ntion. Unt<br>elapsed fr<br> _ic_0 is the v<br>n also inclu<br>the 10, 5 a|
|(5)<br> <br>∆_Tx_**TC**<br>Coef.<br>(s.e.)<br>-0.003<br>(0.002)<br>0.004<br>(0.008)<br>-0.003<br>(0.002)<br>0.007<br>(0.012)<br>0.017*<br>(0.009)<br>0.002<br>(0.009)<br>0.006<br>(0.009)<br>-0.012<br>(0.009)<br>0.001<br>(0.010)<br>-0.059<br>(0.070)<br>0.733<br>(0.992)<br> Columns 2-6<br>_ic_0+_X′_<br>_ic_0_θ_+<br>of the interve<br>_S_ is the time<br>n available,_Y_<br>specifcatio<br>signifcant at|
|(4)<br>Untargeted HH in<br>Treated Cluster<br>(1=Yes)<br>Coef.<br>(s.e.)<br>0.026<br>(0.037)<br>-0.103<br>(0.109)<br>0.033<br>(0.037)<br>-0.086<br>(0.179)<br>-0.209<br>(0.147)<br>-0.046<br>(0.135)<br>0.008<br>(0.147)<br>0.155<br>(0.144)<br>-0.034<br>(0.158)<br>-0.727<br>(1.196)<br>-13.182<br>(10.747)<br>riable defnitions. <br>**TC**_ic ×_∆_Sict_+_γ_0_Y_<br>the assigned date<br>t treated cluster. ∆<br>es is treated. Whe<br>les A4 and A3. The<br>ey are statistically|
|(3)<br>∆_S_<br>Coef.<br>(s.e.)<br>0.002<br>(0.001)<br>-0.007**<br>(0.003)<br>0.002<br>(0.001)<br>0.006<br>(0.006)<br>0.001<br>(0.004)<br>-0.003<br>(0.004)<br>-0.000<br>(0.004)<br>0.002<br>(0.004)<br>-0.002<br>(0.004)<br>0.072**<br>(0.034)<br>0.765***<br>(0.283)<br>ble A1 for va<br>_×_∆_Tic_+_γTS_<br>cement until<br> of the closes<br>ousehold_i_liv<br>ppendix Tab<br>dicate that th|
|(2)<br> <br>∆_T_<br>Coef.<br>(s.e.)<br>0.003<br>(0.006)<br>-0.019<br>(0.020)<br>-0.003<br>(0.004)<br>0.014<br>(0.022)<br>0.012<br>(0.028)<br>0.008<br>(0.026)<br>-0.010<br>(0.025)<br>-0.000<br>(0.025)<br>-0.012<br>(0.025)<br>0.392**<br>(0.163)<br>8.392***<br>(3.171)<br>Appendix Ta<br>_c_+_γTT_**TC**_ic _<br>f the announ<br>e average∆_T_<br>ntargeted h<br>cording to A<br>** and *** in|
|(1)<br>Dep.var. among<br>untargeted HHs in<br>control clusters<br>Mean<br>_SD_<br>_Panel A. Take-up of Program_<br>Household received home improvements from any organization<br>0.0283<br>_0.166_<br>Share of rooms with dirt foor<br>0.356<br>_0.324_<br>Walls recently painted (1=Yes)<br>0.0243<br>_0.154_<br>_Panel B. Satisfaction with housing quality affected by program_<br>Satisfed with overall house quality (1=Yes)<br>0.271<br>_0.445_<br>Satisfed with foor quality (1=Yes)<br>0.207<br>_0.406_<br>Satisfed with wall color (1=Yes)<br>0.159<br>_0.367_<br>_Panel C. Satisfaction with housing quality not affected by program_<br>Satisfed with wall quality (1=Yes)<br>0.147<br>_0.355_<br>Satisfed with roof quality (1=Yes)<br>0.187<br>_0.391_<br>_Panel D. Satisfaction and Trust_<br>Satisfed with quality of family life (1=Yes)<br>0.195<br>_0.397_<br>Trust in others (from 1 to 10)<br>6.526<br>_3.081_<br>Monthly rent if leased out (USD)<br>37.52<br>_24.85_<br>Notes: This table replicates Table 1 using only the sample of untargeted households. See<br>dard errors in parenthesis from the following regression: _Yict_ = _γT_0∆_Tic_+_γS_0∆_Sic_+_γT_**TC**_i_<br>household_i_in cluster_c_at time_t_,∆_Tic_is the time elapsed in months from the assigned date o<br>treated clusters are assigned the average∆_T_ in their cluster, otherwise, they are assigned th<br>vention date until the interview date and the dummy_TCic_ takes value 1 if cluster_c_where u<br>baseline and_Xic_0is a vector of covariates with the baseline variables that were unbalanced ac<br>effects. Standard errors in parentheses are clustered at the cluster level. Coeffcients with *,|

26