|imates<br>egree 3<br>15,30<br>15 15<br>Optimal 38, 38<br>)|15,30<br>15 15<br>Optimal 34, 34<br>)<br>15,30<br>15 15<br>Optimal 34, 34<br>)<br>gust 2015, showing that the reduction<br>nd the 95 percent confdence intervals,<br>s the estimates for a diferent order of<br> al., 2014). This fgure is discussed in|
|---|---|
|Est<br>f D<br>15,45<br>o reform|15,45<br>o reform<br>15,45<br>o reform<br> Au<br>1 a<br>ent<br>o et|
|<br> o<br>30,15<br>eks t|30,15<br>eks t<br>30,15<br>eks t<br>n <br>n <br>es<br>ic|
|RD<br>mial <br>30,30<br><br>dwidth (We|30,30<br><br>dwidth (We<br>30,30<br><br>dwidth (We<br>ates i<br>uatio<br>n pr<br>alon|
|15 -<br>no<br>30,45<br>Ban|30,45<br>Ban<br>30,45<br>Ban<br>reb<br> eq<br>lum<br>n (C|
|20<br>oly<br>45,15|45,15<br>45,15<br>AT <br>om <br> co<br>s i|
|t <br>P<br>45,30|45,30<br>45,30<br>V<br> fr<br>ch<br> a|
|us<br>C. <br>5, 45<br>|5, 45<br><br>5, 45<br><br>he <br> _γ_0 <br> ea<br>dth|
|Aug<br><br>s<br>-.3<br>-.2<br>-.1<br>0<br>.1<br>.2<br>.3<br>Point Estimate<br>4<br>s<br>-.2<br>-.1<br>0<br>.1<br>.2<br>.3<br>Point Estimate|-.3<br>4<br>-.15<br>-.1<br>-.05<br>0<br>.05<br>.1<br>.15<br>Point Estimate<br>4<br> of t<br>mate <br> and <br>ndwi|
|in <br>2<br>ion<br>imal 32, 32<br>ion|imal 31, 31<br>imal 25, 25<br>tion<br>esti<br>me,<br>l ba|
|tes<br>ee <br>act<br>15 15<br>Opt<br>act|15 15<br>Opt<br>S<br>15 15<br>Opt<br>duc<br>D <br>tco<br>ma|
|a<br>r<br>s<br>,30<br>s|,30<br>O<br>,30<br>e<br> R<br>ou<br>ti|
|Reb<br>Deg<br>ran<br>,45<br>15<br>rm)<br>ran|,45<br>15<br>rm)<br> P<br>,45<br>15<br>rm)<br>he r<br>the <br>nt <br> op|
|T <br>of <br> T<br>,15<br>15<br>s to refo<br> T|,15<br>15<br>s to refo<br> of <br>,15<br>15<br>s to refo<br>d t<br>ts <br>ere<br>with|
|A<br>l <br>rd<br>30<br>Week<br>rd|30<br>Week<br>r <br>30<br>Week<br>n<br>lo<br>if<br>|
|f V<br>ia<br>Ca<br>30,30<br>width (<br> Ca|30,30<br>width (<br>mbe<br>30,30<br>width (<br>rou<br>el p<br> a d<br>tion|
|n o<br>nom<br> of <br>30,45<br>Band<br> of|30,45<br>Band<br>u<br>30,45<br>Band<br>es a<br>pan<br> for <br>ma|
|ctio<br>Poly<br>ber <br>,30<br>45,15<br>ume|,30<br>45,15<br>II. N<br>,30<br>45,15<br>imat<br>ach <br>sults <br> esti|
|u<br> <br>m<br>45<br>l|45<br>I<br>45<br>st<br> E<br>e<br>D|
|Red<br>B. <br>Nu<br>-.3<br>-.2<br>-.1<br>0<br>.1<br>.2<br>.3<br>45, 45<br> Vo<br>-.2<br>-.1<br>0<br>.1<br>.2<br>.3|-.3<br>45, 45<br>-.15<br>-.1<br>-.05<br>0<br>.05<br>.1<br>.15<br>45, 45<br>D e<br>es. <br>ts r<br>n R|
|e <br>I. <br>Point Estimate<br>II. <br>Point Estimate|Point Estimate<br>e R<br>om<br>por<br>m a|
|th<br>1<br>al 27, 27|al 20, 20<br>al 23, 23<br> th<br>utc<br> re<br> fro|
|ect of<br>gree <br>15,30<br>15 15<br>Optim|15,30<br>15 15<br>Optim<br>15,30<br>15 15<br>Optim<br>uments <br>f the o<br>ch row<br> result|
|e Ef<br>f De<br><br>15,45<br>to reform)|15,45<br>to reform)<br><br>15,45<br>to reform)<br> doc<br>any o<br>). Ea<br>e the|
|Th<br>al o<br><br>30,15<br>(Weeks|30,15<br>(Weeks<br><br>30,15<br>(Weeks<br> but<br>on <br>rm<br>cat|
|ure B.4: <br>olynomi<br><br>45,15<br>30,45<br>30,30<br>Bandwidth|45,15<br>30,45<br>30,30<br>Bandwidth<br><br>45,15<br>30,45<br>30,30<br>Bandwidth<br>gure B.5, <br>ant efect <br>eks to refo<br>arker indi|
|Fig<br>. P<br> <br>45,30|<br>45,30<br> <br>45,30<br> Fi<br>ifc<br>we<br>e m|
|A<br>-.<br>-.<br>-.<br><br>.<br>.<br>.<br>45, 45<br>-.<br>-.<br><br>.<br>.<br>.|-.<br>45, 45<br>-.<br>-.<br>-.<br><br>.<br>.<br>.<br>45, 45<br> to<br>n<br> (<br>gl|
|3<br>2<br>1<br>0<br>1<br>2<br>3<br>Point Estimate<br>2<br>1<br>0<br>1<br>2<br>3<br>Point Estimate|3<br>15<br>1<br>05<br>0<br>05<br>1<br>15<br>Point Estimate<br>Notes: This Figure is similar <br>did not have a statistically sig<br>for diferent bandwidth values<br>polynomial. The orange trian<br>Section 4.2.|

52