> POILICY RESEARCII WORKIN.G PAPER 1639

# Summary findings

Recent legislation- to provide income security to workers in Indonesia covers only those in the formal sector, initially. But workers in the informal sector are at even greater risk of income loss and are more vulnerable to shocks because of lower average incomes.

Wiebe addresses the question of whether there is a rationale for income security schemes for Indonesia's informal sector. His research suggests that, through a range of existing public programs, Indonesia's government already provides important security mechanisms for informal sector workers, and must continue to do so. He finds no compelling evidence of the need for a nationwide inconme security scheme for such workers.

He bases his argument against a new income security scheme on three main conclusions: First, contrary to popular belief in Indonesia, only about 12 percent of the workforce in the informal sector (nor 40 percent) - and even less in the formal sector - is underemployed.

insecurity in Indonesia. The connection between underemployment and income insecurity is problematic in theory and remains unsubstantiated by national survey data.

Third, many mechanisms already exist in Indonesia to mitigate the disruption caused by income insecurity. Households and communities use private strategies to smooth consumptioni and investment, and the government is already active in providing additional income security.

Not only does empirical evidence fail to justify a major niew policy response, says Wiebe, but most evidence suggests that such a response is not necessary at this time.

Wiebe suggests that any new initiative directed at income insecurity should probably be limited in scope and should focus on Eastern Indonesia and on remote or isolated areas of Java, areas with low average incomes. If concerns about income insecurity persist, money should be spent finding **out** where it actually is before implementing a nationwide scheme to deal with it.

Seconid, this level of underemployment does not represent compelling e-mpirical evidence of income

- This paper a product of the Indonesia Policy and Operations Division, East Asia and Pacific, Country Department IIl -- is part of a larger effort in the department to develop a comprehensive labor market strategy for Indonesia. This paper was presented at a joint Ministry of Manpower-World Bank workshop, "Indonesian Workers in the 21st Century,"Jakarta, April 2-4, 1996. Copies of this paper are available free from the World Bank, 1818 H Street NW, Washington, DC 20433. Please contact Joseph Israel, room MC9-378, telephone 202-458-5117, fax 202-522-1675, Internet address jisrael(havorldhank.org. August 1996. (29 pages)

_The Policy Research Working Paper Series dissenminates the findings of work in progress to encourage the exchange of ideas about development issues. An objective of the series is to get the findings out quickly, even if the presentations are less than fully polished. The papers carry the namties of the authors and should be used and cited accordingly. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions are the authors own and shoukld not be attributed to the World Bank, its Executive Board of Directors, or any of its member countries._ Produced by the Policy Research Dissemination Center