Putnam, R. D. (2000). _Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community_ . Simon and schuster. Ragnedda, M. (2018). Conceptualizing Digital Capital. _Telematics and Informatics_ , 35 (8). pp. 2366-2375. ISSN 0736-5853.

- Roos, H., Ank, M., & Albert, M. (2022). Online democratic participation during COVID-19: Assessing implications for inclusivity of citizen engagement. _Information Polity_ , 28(4):1-16.

- Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. _Biometrika_ , _70_ (1), 41-55.

- Macroeconomics. Volume 65, September 2020, 103214.

- Schlozman, K. L., Verba, S., & Brady, H. E. (2012). The Unheavenly Chorus: Unequal Political Voice and the Broken Promise of American Democracy. Princeton University Press.

- Senshaw, D., & Twinomurinzi, H. (2022). Innovating with government digital platforms in low-income countries: the dynamic capabilities of Woredas in Ethiopia. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management, 13(4), 812-836.

- Serdült, U., Hofmann, G., Benli-Trichet, M., Vayenas, C., Villeneuve, J-P., Picco-Schwendener, A., & Colosante, L. (2023). Introducing the DigiPart-Index on the National Level. Mapping digital political participation for Austria, France, Canada, Germany, Italy, Japan and Switzerland. A work in progress paper for the annual congress of the Swiss Political Science Association 2023.

- Shim, D. C., & Eom, T. H. (2008). E-government and anti-corruption: Empirical analysis of international

- data. _Intl Journal of Public Administration_ , _31_ (3), 298-316.

- Sianesi, B. (2004). “An Evaluation of the Swedish System of Active Labor Market Programs in the 1990s”. _Review of Economics and Statistics_ , 86(1): 133–55.

- Spada, P., Mellon, J., Peixoto, T., & Sjoberg, F. M. (2015). Effects of the Internet on Participation.

- Sun, Y., & Yan W. (2020). The Power of Data From the Global South: Environmental CivicTech and Data Activism in China. International Journal of Communication 14(20): 2144–2162.

- government. _Public administration review_ , _66_ (3), 354-369.

- Vaccari, C., Chadwick, A., & O'Loughlin, B. (2015). Dual screening the political: Media events, social media, and citizen engagement. _Journal of communication_ , _65_ (6), 1041-1061.

- Vadlamannati, K. C., & Cooray, A. (2016). Do freedom of information laws improve bureaucratic efficiency? An empirical investigation. Oxford Economic Papers, 68(4), 968-993.

- Waddington H., Sonnenfeld A., Finetti J., Gaarder M., John. D., & Stevenson J. (2019). Citizen engagement in public services in low- and middle-income countries: A mixed-methods systematic review of participation, inclusion, transparency and accountability (PITA) initiatives. Campbell Systematic Reviews. 2019;15: e1025. htps://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1025 .

- Wandaogo, A. A. (2022). Does digitalization improve government effectiveness? Evidence from developing and developed countries. _Applied Economics_ , _54_ (33), 3840-3860.

- Welch, E. W., Hinnant, C. C., & Moon, M. J. (2005). Linking citizen satisfaction with e-government and trust in government. _Journal of public administration research and theory_ , _15_ (3), 371-391.

- Wooldridge, J. M. (2002). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data mit press. Cambridge, MA, 108.

- World Bank. (2013). World Bank Group Strategy. Washington, DC. © World Bank. <u>htps://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/16095</u> License: CC BY-NC-ND 3.0 IGO.

- World Bank. (2015). e-Government. World Bank Group Brief. <u>htps://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/digitaldevelopment/brief/egovernment#:~:text=What%20is% 20e%2DGovernment%3F,and%20other%20arms%20of%20government.</u>

- World Bank. (2016). Evaluating Digital Citizen Engagement: A Practical Guide. World Bank, Washington, DC, February 2016.

22