Table 10: Heterogeneous effects of PROSPERA on young members.

||(1)|(2)|(3)|(4)|(5)|(6)|(7)|(8)|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
||Transport|Entert<br>eq|Kitchen<br>sup|Basic<br>serv|Y.<br>school|_Inc >_0|log(incom|e)ln(imp<br>cons)|
|**_Panel A: Overall_**|||||||||
|Treatment X 2017|0.0275<br>(0.0272)|0.119*<br>(0.0609)|0.142**<br>(0.0593)|-0.0119<br>(0.0820)|0.0269<br>(0.209)|-0.0194<br>(0.0273)|-0.0736<br>(0.0848)|0.0311***<br>(0.0119)|
|**_Panel B: Household_**|**_status_**||||||||
|Original HH|0.050<br>(0.039)|0.043<br>(0.072)|-0.007<br>(0.072)|-0.042<br>(0.090)|0.221<br>(0.261)|-0.062*<br>(0.038)|-0.113<br>(0.094)|0.001<br>(0.014)|
|New HH|0.009<br>(0.029)|0.174**<br>(0.069)|0.253***<br>(0.072)|0.011<br>(0.088)|-0.130<br>(0.237)|0.028<br>(0.027)|-0.046<br>(0.100)|0.054***<br>(0.014)|
|**_Panel C: Age (in 19_**|**_97) groups_**||||||||
|0-5|0.025<br>(0.032)|0.072<br>(0.075)|0.148**<br>(0.072)|-0.035<br>(0.089)|0.200<br>(0.220)|-0.009<br>(0.035)|-0.043<br>(0.065)|0.022<br>(0.015)|
|6-10|-0.001|0.108|0.019|-0.001|0.167|-0.013|-0.070|0.031*|
|11-16|(0.036)<br>0.057|(0.091)<br>0.329***|(0.085)<br>0.262**|(0.100)<br>-0.017|(0.258)<br>0.711***|(0.036)<br>-0.016|(0.058)<br>0.097|(0.018)<br>0.050**|
|Over 16|(0.048)<br>0.097|(0.101)<br>0.051|(0.112)<br>0.307**|(0.131)<br>0.130|(0.252)<br>-0.043|(0.052)<br>-0.023|(0.166)<br>0.187|(0.021)<br>0.045|
||(0.060)|(0.147)|(0.154)|(0.137)|(0.293)|(0.087)|(0.171)|(0.034)|
|**_Panel D: Health sho_**|**_cks_**||||||||
|No health shocks<br>Health shocks|0.026<br>(0.030)<br>0.031<br>(0.038)|0.178***<br>(0.068)<br>-0.038<br>(0.078)|0.148**<br>(0.066)<br>0.127<br>(0.081)|0.002<br>(0.086)<br>-0.103<br>(0.100)|0.041<br>(0.228)<br>-0.010<br>(0.293)|-0.047<br>(0.031)<br>0.047<br>(0.039)|-0.122<br>(0.092)<br>0.052<br>(0.110)|0.033***<br>(0.013)<br>0.027<br>(0.018)|
|**_Panel E: Migration_**|||||||||
|Same locality|0.043|0.061|0.074|-0.056|-0.086|-0.035|-0.057|0.013|
||(0.031)|(0.068)|(0.068)|(0.087)|(0.232)|(0.032)|(0.102)|(0.012)|
|Mig: Metropolis|0.047|0.477**|-0.043|0.225|0.603|0.031|-0.176|0.047|
||(0.063)|(0.225)|(0.2142)|(0.239)|(0.986)|(0.045)|(0.224)|(0.043)|
|Mig: Other|-0.017|0.227**|0.314***|0.055|0.226|0.007|-0.184|0.061|
||(0.042)|(0.092)|(0.098)|(0.112)|(0.311)|(0.032)|(0.110)|(0.020)|
|Observations|6,702|6,702|6,702|6,702|6,702|5,484|4,794|6,527|
|Mean C 1997|0.020|0.985|0.412|1.218|1.392|0.036|0.237|8.971|
|Mean C 2017|0.220|1.420|1.814|2.483|8.009|0.799|8.118|9.139|

This table shows the possible heterogeneity of the long-term effect for individuals by specific groups of interest. The unit of observation is an individual, who could be in an original or new household. The outcomes constructed are: (1) _Transportation_ , which adds the number of cars and vans; (2) _Entertainment equipment_ , which gathers under entertainment equipment number of TV, radio and sound equipment; (3) _Kitchen supplies_ , which sums the following appliances: blender, refrigerator, electric grill, gas stove or microwave oven; (4) _Basic services_ , which consists of the availability of the following services: firm floor, electricity, drainage and water access in the property; (5) _Years of completed formal schooling_ ; (6) _Pos income_ indicates household per capita income greater than zero; (7) _log(income)_ , is total individual income; and (8) _log(imp cons)_ , is the imputed measure of non-durable expenditure on food personal products, and clothing. Data employed comes from 1997 ENCASEH and 2017-18 ENCEL. Panel A shows a DiD estimation. Panel B estimates the treatment effect for different HH types: original and new. Panel C explores differences in the treatment effect by groups of age formed based on the ages associated to critical schooling stages. Panel D shows differences by health shocks status (health shocks are defined as having at least one household member sick or injured during the two weeks before the survey). Panel E looks into the treatment effect by migration status (Metropolis includes Mexico City, Guadalajara and Monterrey). Controls include (from ENCASEH 1997): HH head age, education, speaking a dialect, HH size, % members under 15, dummies for home, productive land and draft animals ownership, and locality marginalization index. Standard errors clustered at the locality level. Asterisks indicate significance at the ***1%, **5%, and *10% level.

29