# Table A9: Revealed preferences by rider risk perception

||||Depe<br>|ndent variabl<br>|e: Chose reser<br>|ved space<br>||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
||(1)|(2)|(3)|(4)|(5)|(6)|(7)|(8)|(9)|
||_Panel _|_A: By risk ty_|_pe, zero oppor_|_tunity cost_||||||
|High risk perceiver|0.105|0.095|0.089|0.072|0.064|0.064|-0.009|-0.022|-0.027|
||(0.036)|(0.035)|(0.033)|(0.033)|(0.032)|(0.032)|(0.047)|(0.048)|(0.047)|
|High crowding|||-0.002|||0.008|||0.015|
||||(0.040)|||(0.036)|||(0.052)|
|Few men in reserved space|||0.088|||0.088|||0.078|
||||(0.023)|||(0.022)|||(0.033)|
|Constant|0.246|0.249|0.204|0.248|0.252|0.205|0.299|0.304|0.262|
||(0.017)|(0.017)|(0.021)|(0.019)|(0.019)|(0.021)|(0.028)|(0.026)|(0.029)|
|Mean dependent variable _|_ Low risk perceiver||0.246|||0.248|||0.299||
|||(0.009)|||(0.009)|||(0.015)||
|Riders|208|208|208|205|205|205|111|111|111|
|Line fxed efects|No|Yes|Yes|No|Yes|Yes|No|Yes|Yes|
||Physical|Physical|Physical|Verbal|Verbal|Verbal||||
|Type of perceived risk|harassment|harassment|harassment|harassment|harassment|harassment|Robbery|Robbery|Robbery|
||_Panel_|_B: By risk t_|_ype and opport_|_unity cost_||||||
|ˆ_βP_1: Positive opportunity cost _×_ High risk perceiver|0.081|0.078|0.073|0.092|0.089|0.088|0.137|0.127|0.106|
||(0.015)|(0.015)|(0.015)|(0.018)|(0.018)|(0.019)|(0.029)|(0.031)|(0.025)|
|ˆ_βP_2: Zero opportunity cost _×_ High risk perceiver|0.333|0.323|0.326|0.311|0.304|0.308|0.263|0.265|0.262|
||(0.030)|(0.030)|(0.030)|(0.026)|(0.026)|(0.026)|(0.034)|(0.034)|(0.035)|
|ˆ_βP_3: Positive opportunity cost _×_ Low risk perceiver|0.091|0.093|0.090|0.085|0.088|0.084|0.121|0.127|0.131|
||(0.015)|(0.015)|(0.015)|(0.016)|(0.016)|(0.015)|(0.022)|(0.022)|(0.022)|
|ˆ_βP_4: Zero opportunity cost _×_ Low risk perceiver|0.250|0.251|0.251|0.246|0.247|0.245|0.308|0.311|0.312|
||(0.018)|(0.018)|(0.018)|(0.019)|(0.019)|(0.019)|(0.030)|(0.029)|(0.029)|
|Observations|13136|13136|12710|13110|13110|12684|7586|7586|7304|
|Riders|208|208|208|205|205|205|111|111|111|
|Control for high crowding|No|No|Yes|No|No|Yes|No|No|Yes|
|Line fxed efects|No|Yes|Yes|No|Yes|Yes|No|Yes|Yes|
||Physical|Physical|Physical|Verbal|Verbal|Verbal||||
|Type of perceived risk|harassment|harassment|harassment|harassment|harassment|harassment|Robbery|Robbery|Robbery|
||_Post-e_<br>|_stimate tests _<br>|_for heterogene_|_ous efects_||||||
|By opportunity cost: zero opportunity cost - positive|opportunity c|ost||||||||
|High risk perceivers: <sup>ˆ</sup>_βP_2 _−_<sup>ˆ</sup>_βP_1|0.253|0.245|0.253|0.219|0.214|0.221|0.126|0.138|0.156|
|<br>P-value|0.000|0.000|0.000|0.000|0.000|0.000|0.000|0.000|0.000|
|Low risk perceivers: <sup>ˆ</sup>_βP_4 _−_<sup>ˆ</sup>_βP_3|0.159|0.158|0.160|0.161|0.159|0.161|0.187|0.183|0.180|
|<br>P-value|0.000|0.000|0.000|0.000|0.000|0.000|0.000|0.000|0.000|
|By risk perception: high risk - low risk perceivers||||||||||
|Zero opportunity cost: <sup>ˆ</sup>_βP_2 _−_<sup>ˆ</sup>_βP_4|0.084|0.073|0.075|0.064|0.056|0.063|-0.044|-0.046|-0.050|
|<br>P-value<br>|0.019|0.040|0.034|0.049|0.083|0.052|0.331|0.312|0.273|
|Positiveoortunitcost: <sup>ˆ</sup>_β−_<sup>ˆ</sup>_β_|-0010|-0015|-0017|0007|0001|0004|0016|-0000|-0025|
|ppy _P_1 _P_3<br>P-value|.<br>0.651|.<br>0.473|.<br>0.403|.<br>0.768|.<br>0.969|.<br>0.878|.<br>0.653|.<br>0.996|.<br>0.459|

_Note:_ Unit of observation is one ride. Sample includes rides for riders who completed the exit survey, which included questions on perceived risk. Columns 7-9 include observations for participants who completed a version of the exit survey including perceived risk of robbery (added in a second wave of data collection). Panel A includes only rides with zero opportunity cost imposed. Panel B includes all revealed preference rides. Observations weighted by the inverse of the number of rides taken by the individual rider. Standard errors in parentheses, clustered at rider level.