# **TABLE 2a** : City Performance by Levels of Globalization and Governance – Full Sample (412 Cities) <u>Average Ratings</u>

|**CITY PERFORMANCE**|**GL**<br>**Cit**<br>**Globali**<br>**Taylor**|**OBAL**<br>**y**<br>**zation,**<br>**2002**|**IZATI**<br> <br>**Cou**<br>**Global**<br>**Kea**|**ON**<br>**ntry**<br>**ization,**<br>**rney**|<br>**Brib**<br>**Utilit**<br>**20**|**G**<br>**ery in**<br>**y EOS**<br>**03**|**OVE**<br>**St**<br>**Captur**<br>**20**|**RNAN**<br>**ate**<br>**e, EOS**<br>**03**|**CE**<br>**Co**<br>**Con**<br>**Corr**<br>**K**|**untry**<br>**trol of**<br>**uption,**<br>**K02 **|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
||Low|High|Low|High|Poor|Good|Poor|Good|Poor|Good|
|Access to Sewerage (%, UN)|62%|94%|75%|99%|55%|91%|60%|89%|62%|95%|
|Access to Water (%, UN)|75%|95%|81%|100%|68%|96%|72%|94%|73%|98%|
|Access to Electricity (%, UN)|90%|94%|90%|100%|82%|95%|83%|95%|85%|100%|
|Access to Telephone lines 1 (%, UN)|46%|80%|60%|95%|37%|79%|41%|80%|40%|89%|
|Access to telephone lines 2 (1-7,<br>EOS)|4.8|6.0|5.4|6.4|4.4|6.2|4.6|6.0|4.6|6.2|
|Access to Cellular phones (1-7, EOS)|5.7|6.5|6.1|6.7|5.5|6.5|5.6|6.4|5.6|6.5|
|Access to Internet in schools (1-7,<br>EOS)|2.9|4.7|3.7|5.3|2.9|4.8|3.0|4.7|2.9|5.0|
|Quality of Infrastructure (1-7, EOS)|3.1|5.0|3.5|5.5|2.9|4.7|2.9|4.7|2.9|5.0|
|Quality of Electricity (1-7, EOS)|3.9|5.6|4.4|6.2|3.6|5.7|3.8|5.4|3.7|5.8|
|**Overall Number of Cities**|**132**|**129**|**131**|**123**|**137**|**134**|**136**|**135**|**211**|**201**|

_Note: Each column variable was segmented into two equal samples, below and above the median value of the full sample._

# **TABLE 2b:** City Performance by Levels of Globalization and Governance – Non OECD Sample (274 Cities)

Average Ratings

|**CITY PERFORMANCE**<br>|**GL**<br>**Ci**<br>**Globali**<br>**Taylor**|**OBAL**<br>**ty**<br>**zation,**<br>**2002**<br>|**IZATI**<br> <br>**Cou**<br>**Globali**<br>**Kear**|**ON**<br>**ntry**<br>**zation,**<br>**ney**|**Brib**<br>**Utilit**<br>**20**|**G**<br>**ery in**<br>**y EOS**<br>**03**|**OVER**<br>**St**<br>**Captur**<br>**20**|**NANC**<br>**ate**<br>**e, EOS**<br>**03**|**E**<br>**Cou**<br>**Cont**<br>**Corru**<br>**KK**|**ntry**<br>**rol of**<br>**ption,**<br>**02 **|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
||Low|High|Low|High|Poor|Good|Poor|Good|Poor|Good|
|Access to Sewerage (%, UN)|57%|72%|71%|79%|50%|87%|51%|82%|56%|72%|
|Access to Water (%, UN)|74%|79%|78%|85%|64%|93%|66%|88%|70%|81%|
|Access to Electricity (%, UN)|87%|90%|88%|92%|80%|93%|80%|92%|83%|90%|
|Access to Telephone lines 1 (%, UN)|43%|57%|48%|76%|32%|74%|38%|64%|37%|59%|
|Access to telephone lines 2 (1-7,<br>EOS)|4.4|5.1|5.4|5.4|4.2|5.6|4.4|5.4|4.1|5.6|
|Access to Cellular phones (1-7, EOS)|5.4|6.1|6.2|6.1|5.4|6.2|5.5|6.0|5.4|6.1|
|Access to Internet in schools (1-7,<br>EOS)|2.4|3.3|3.5|3.9|2.7|4.0|2.8|3.9|2.6|4.1|
|Quality of Infrastructure (1-7, EOS)|2.6|3.7|3.5|3.4|2.8|3.8|2.7|3.9|2.7|3.8|
|Quality of Electricity (1-7, EOS)|3.6|4.4|4.2|4.5|3.4|4.8|3.6|4.6|3.4|4.8|
|**Overall Number of Cities**|**70**|**65**|**61**|**61**|**102**|**102**|**106**|**98**|**138**|**136**|

_Note: Each column variable was segmented into two equal samples, below and above the median value of the full sample._ 21