**Treatment effect on components of the Food Consumption Score, continued...**

|Spices and cond|iments|||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|6 months|6.81|-0.01|-0.13***|-0.05|-0.00|0.05|0.12***|0.19***|0.02|
||(1.02)|(0.05)|(0.04)|(0.04)|(0.05)|(0.04)|(0.04)|(0.04)|(0.08)|
|12 months|<br>6.79|<br>0.05|<br>-0.07***|<br>0.01|<br>0.07**|<br>0.12***|<br>0.19***|<br>0.20***|<br>0.15**|
||(0.96)|(0.04)|(0.02)|(0.02)|(0.03)|(0.02)|(0.03)|(0.03)|(0.08)|
|18 months|<br>6.82|<br>0.07**|<br>-0.09***|<br>0.02|<br>0.08***|<br>0.15***|<br>0.26***|<br>0.17***|<br>0.18**|
||(0.89)|(0.03)|(0.02)|(0.02)|(0.03)|(0.02)|(0.02)|(0.02)|(0.07)|

_Note: Significance level p< 0.01 - ***, 0.05 - **, 0.1 - *; Robust standard errors in parentheses; Each coefficient in this table is obtained from a different regression of the outcome on specification (1), which includes a binary treatment indicator fully interacted with the outcome at baseline and the propensity score, the model also includes strata fixed effects (n=5); column (4) presents the main results using IPW and sampling weights; column (8) presents the results from instrumenting currently receiving the transfers with eligibility at baseline; columns (1) and (7) are estimated by trimming the top/bottom of the treatment group by the difference in attrition between the treatment and control, as in Lee (2009); columns (2) to (3) and (5) to (6) replace outcome values for the attritters with +/- 0.x standard deviations of their respective treatment group-wave means as in Kling and Liebmann (2004), lower bounds subtract this value from the treatment group and add it to the control group and vice versa for the upper bounds._

# **Appendix Table 11: Treatment effect on components of the Reduced Coping Strategies Index.**

||**Control**||**Lower bounds**||**Unadjusted**||**Upper bounds**||**IV**|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
||**mean**|(1)|(2)|(3)|(4)|(5)|(6)|(7)|(8)|
||**(standard**|||||||||
||**deviation)**|Lee(-)|(+/-).25 SD|(+/-).1 SD||(-/+).1 SD|(-/+).25 SD|Lee(+)||
|Panel A: Red<br>|uced Coping <br>|Strategies In<br>|dex(inverted an<br>|d standardized<br>|to baseline con<br>|trol)<br>||||
|6 months|0.21|0.15***|0.08***|0.14***|0.19***|0.23***|0.29***|0.30***|0.27***|
||(0.92)|(0.04)|(0.03)|(0.03)|(0.04)|(0.03)|(0.03)|(0.04)|(0.06)|
|12 months|0.51|0.01|-0.05**|0.01|0.05*|0.08***|0.14***|0.18***|0.13*|
||(0.61)|(0.03)|(0.02)|(0.02)|(0.03)|(0.02)|(0.02)|(0.02)|(0.07)|
|18 months|0.57|-0.16***|-0.25***|-0.17***|-0.10***|-0.06***|0.03*|0.01|-0.34***|
||(059)|(003)|(002)|(002)|(003)|(002)|(002)|(003)|(009)|
|Panel B: Co|.<br>mponents of th|.<br>e Reduced C|.<br>opingStrategie|.<br>s Index,how m|.<br>anydays in las|.<br>t 7 days did th|.<br>e household:|.|.|
|Relyon less|preferred,che|aper food||||||||
|6 months|3.51|-0.47***|-0.57***|-0.33***|-0.17|-0.01|0.23**|0.09|-0.27|
||(3.23)|(0.15)|(0.11)|(0.11)|(0.15)|(0.11)|(0.11)|(0.15)|(0.21)|
|12 months|1.57|-0.44***|-0.31***|-0.14**|-0.03|0.08|0.25***|0.13|-0.10|
||(1.90)|(0.07)|(0.06)|(0.06)|(0.09)|(0.06)|(0.06)|(0.09)|(0.23)|
|18 months|1.65|0.58***|0.47***|0.77***|0.96***|1.18***|1.48***|1.21***|2.86***|
||(1.94)|(0.12)|(0.07)|(0.07)|(0.12)|(0.07)|(0.07)|(0.12)|(0.47)|
|Borrowed fo|od or moneyt|o buyfood||||||||
|6 months|0.40|-0.28***|-0.24***|-0.17***|-0.13***|-0.08**|-0.01|-0.11**|-0.19**|
||(1.00)|(0.04)|(0.03)|(0.03)|(0.05)|(0.03)|(0.04)|(0.05)|(0.08)|
|12 months|0.16|-0.14***|-0.07***|-0.02|0.01|0.05***|0.10***|0.03|0.08|
||(0.58)|(0.02)|(0.02)|(0.01)|(0.02)|(0.01)|(0.01)|(0.02)|(0.06)|
|18 months|0.30|-0.25***|-0.24***|-0.13***|-0.06|0.02|0.13***|-0.03|-0.19|
||(0.91)|(0.04)|(0.02)|(0.02)|(0.04)|(0.02)|(0.02)|(0.04)|(0.14)|
|Reduced nu|mber of meals|eatenper da|y|||||||
|6 months|1.69|-0.93***|-0.75***|-0.56***|-0.44***|-0.31***|-0.12|-0.38***|-0.65***|
||(2.64)|(0.10)|(0.09)|(0.09)|(0.12)|(0.09)|(0.09)|(0.12)|(0.17)|
|12 months|<br>1.28|<br>-0.86***|<br>-0.57***|<br>-0.37***|<br>-0.23**|<br>-0.09|<br>0.11|<br>-0.13|<br>-0.65**|
||(2.39)|(0.09)|(0.07)|(0.07)|(0.11)|(0.07)|(0.07)|(0.11)|(0.30)|
|18 months|1.34|-0.93***|-0.82***|-0.51***|-0.29**|-0.08|0.23***|-0.19|-0.81**|
||(2.59)|(0.11)|(0.07)|(0.07)|(0.13)|(0.07)|(0.07)|(0.13)|(0.41)|
|Reducedpor|tion size of m|eals||||||||
|6 months|1.24|-0.84***|-0.65***|-0.50***|-0.40***|-0.30***|-0.15**|-0.34***|-0.59***|
||(2.19)|(0.08)|(0.08)|(0.08)|(0.10)|(0.08)|(0.08)|(0.11)|(0.15)|
|12 months|<br>0.88|<br>-0.50***|<br>-0.37***|<br>-0.23***|<br>-0.14*|<br>-0.05|<br>0.09*|<br>-0.07|<br>-0.37*|
||(1.63)|(0.06)|(0.05)|(0.05)|(0.07)|(0.05)|(0.05)|(0.08)|(0.19)|
|18 months|<br>0.68|<br>-0.26***|<br>-0.19***|<br>0.01|<br>0.14**|<br>0.28***|<br>0.48***|<br>0.23***|<br>0.43**|
||(1.39)|(0.06)|(0.04)|(0.04)|(0.07)|(0.04)|(0.04)|(0.07)|(0.20)|
|Reduced con|sumption of a|dults so chil|dren can eat|||||||
|6 months|0.98|-0.69***|-0.57***|-0.43***|-0.34***|-0.24***|-0.10|-0.29***|-0.47***|
||(2.05)|(0.08)|(0.07)|(0.07)|(0.09)|(0.07)|(0.07)|(0.09)|(0.14)|
|12 months|<br>0.83|<br>-0.52***|<br>-0.32***|<br>-0.17***|<br>-0.07|<br>0.04|<br>0.19***|<br>0.01|<br>-0.21|
||(1.72)|(0.06)|(0.06)|(0.06)|(0.08)|(0.06)|(0.06)|(0.08)|(0.22)|
|18 months|<br>0.48|<br>-0.15***|<br>-0.09***|<br>0.10***|<br>0.20***|<br>0.35***|<br>0.54***|<br>0.27***|<br>0.69***|
||(1.24)|(0.05)|(0.03)|(0.03)|(0.06)|(0.03)|(0.03)|(0.06)|(0.20)|

_Note: Significance level p< 0.01 - ***, 0.05 - **, 0.1 - *; Robust standard errors in parentheses; Each coefficient in this table is obtained from a different regression of the outcome on specification (1), which includes a binary treatment indicator fully interacted with the outcome at baseline and the propensity score, the model also includes strata fixed effects (n=5); column (4) presents the main results using IPW and sampling weights; column (8) presents the results from instrumenting currently receiving the transfers with eligibility at baseline; columns (1) and (7) are estimated by trimming the top/bottom of the treatment group by the difference in attrition between the treatment and control, as in_ 53