|_Think HIV is a_<br>_punishment_<br>_for_<br>_sleeping around_<br>(7)<br>-0.059***<br>(0.022)<br>[0.096]<br>0.065**<br>(0.030)<br>[0.335]<br>0.102***<br>(0.023)<br>0.059<br>0.644<br>-0.093**<br>(0.036)<br>[0.071]<br>0.156**<br>(0.063)<br>[0.112]<br>-0.056<br>(0.042)<br>[0.570]<br>0.028<br>(0.049)<br>0.260***<br>(0.028)<br>0.100<br>0.487<br>3,262<br>Yes<br>ctively. FWER adjusted<br>e owner, father obtained|
|---|
|_Think_<br>_people_<br>_with HIV should_<br>_be blamed_<br>(6)<br>-0.017<br>(0.019)<br>[0.952]<br>0.016<br>(0.028)<br>[0.998]<br>0.163***<br>(0.020)<br>0.051<br>0.570<br>-0.009<br>(0.038)<br>[0.822]<br>0.007<br>(0.060)<br>[0.989]<br>-0.032<br>(0.043)<br>[0.594]<br>0.117***<br>(0.039)<br>0.193***<br>(0.032)<br>0.073<br>0.311<br>3,262<br>Yes<br> 10 percent level, respe<br>ize, wealth index, hom|
|_Think an HIV+_<br>_boy_<br>_should_<br>_be_<br>_allowed to play_<br>_football_<br>_Think_<br>_testing_<br>_for HIV means_<br>_sleeping around_<br>(4)<br>(5)<br>**o [column heading]**<br>0.035**<br>-0.019<br>(0.015)<br>(0.020)<br>[0.184]<br>[0.952]<br>-0.061*<br>0.020<br>(0.034)<br>(0.032)<br>[0.537]<br>[0.998]<br>0.204***<br>0.104***<br>(0.023)<br>(0.022)<br>0.127<br>0.039<br>0.377<br>0.538<br>0.088**<br>-0.066**<br>(0.035)<br>(0.032)<br>[0.074]<br>[0.176]<br>-0.025<br>0.084<br>(0.051)<br>(0.051)<br>[0.981]<br>[0.476]<br>-0.040<br>-0.049<br>(0.044)<br>(0.034)<br>[0.594]<br>[0.570]<br>0.096***<br>-0.029<br>(0.036)<br>(0.038)<br>0.284***<br>0.152***<br>(0.030)<br>(0.024)<br>0.124<br>0.058<br>0.694<br>0.161<br>3,262<br>3,262<br>Yes<br>Yes<br>*, ** and * denote signifcance at the 1, 5 and <br>tatement in the heading of each column.<br>g of each column.<br>ngle, does not live with the family, household s<br>a as a native language.|
|_Would_<br>_reveal_<br>_HIV+_<br>_status_<br>_to partner_<br>_Would_<br>_prefer_<br>_to_<br>_keep_<br>_HIV+_<br>_of_<br>_family member a_<br>_secret_<br>_Would buy fruit_<br>_& veg from HIV+_<br>_shopkeeper_<br>(1)<br>(2)<br>(3)<br>**Panel A: Dep. var. (r**_i,t_**) is respondent’s expectation on the share of peers wh**<br>T1<br>0.018<br>0.003<br>0.037***<br>(0.014)<br>(0.025)<br>(0.012)<br>[0.886]<br>[0.993]<br>[0.033]<br>T1*ri,t-1<br>-0.023<br>-0.008<br>-0.138***<br>(0.039)<br>(0.033)<br>(0.038)<br>[0.998]<br>[0.998]<br>[0.006]<br>_ri,t−_1 (_a_)<br>0.149***<br>0.139***<br>0.268***<br>(0.029)<br>(0.024)<br>(0.027)<br>R-squared<br>0.035<br>0.041<br>0.107<br>Mean Dep. Var. (Control)<br>0.319<br>0.589<br>0.260<br>**Panel B: Dep. var. (Y**_i,t_**) is respondent’s own opinion on [column heading]**<br>T1<br>0.030<br>0.089*<br>0.091***<br>(0.040)<br>(0.047)<br>(0.025)<br>[0.701]<br>[0.181]<br>[0.005]<br>T1*Prior on community (r_i,t−_1)<br>0.064<br>-0.008<br>-0.022<br>(0.069)<br>(0.060)<br>(0.079)<br>[0.888]<br>[0.990]<br>[0.988]<br>T1*Y_i,t−_1<br>-0.043<br>-0.075*<br>-0.111***<br>(0.034)<br>(0.042)<br>(0.041)<br>[0.570]<br>[0.387]<br>[0.006]<br>Prior on community (r_i,t−_1)<br>0.057<br>0.040<br>0.081<br>(0.048)<br>(0.040)<br>(0.055)<br>_Yi,t−_1 (_b_)<br>0.279***<br>0.223***<br>0.359***<br>(0.028)<br>(0.028)<br>(0.031)<br>R-squared<br>0.108<br>0.086<br>0.131<br>Mean Dep. Var. (Control)<br>0.726<br>0.712<br>0.518<br>Observations<br>3,262<br>3,262<br>3,262<br>Controls(_c_)<br>Yes<br>Yes<br>Yes<br>Notes: Standard errors in parentheses adjusted for clustering at the screening centre level (53 clusters). **<br>p-values in square brackets based on 10,000 replications. Sample includes only T1 + Control.<br>(a) ri,t-1 is the respondent’s baseline expectation of the share of community members who agree with the s<br>(b) Yi,t-1 is a dummy taking value 1 if at baseline the respondent agreed with the statement in the headin<br>(c) Controls include: female, age, currently attending school, years of education, english spoken at home, si<br>higher than secondary education, mother obtained higher than secondary education, muslim, speaks Yorub|

42