of business assets and business investments.<sup>17</sup> _Business performance index_ assesses the total value of profits and revenues across all beneficiary owned businesses.

**_Psychosocial outcomes._** We measure _subjective well-being_ with 14 standardized items: ten items from the CESD-R-10 depression screener (0-7 days, e.g., “Over the past seven days, how often have you felt depressed?”, _reverse-coded_ ), a life satisfaction item (Cantril ladder, 10point scale), a novel measure of inner peace (10-point scale), an original measure of feeling blessed by God (1=No, definitely not to 4=Yes, definitely), and _subjective health_ (1=Poor to 5=Excellent).

_Self-efficacy_ is assessed with four items from the Generalized Self-Efficacy Scale (Schwarzer & Jerusalem, 1995) and one item from the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (1=Not at all to 4=Yes, absolutely) (Rosenberg, 1979) which are summed and then standardized to the control condition. _Future expectations_ is a single item of expected socioeconomic standing in two years, using the MacArthur Scale of Subjective Social Status (Ritterman Weintraub et al., 2015). We also construct a summary _psychological outcomes composite_ across these three outcomes.

_Social outcomes_ . We measure _social standing_ with 3 items: the MacArthur Scale of Subjective Social Status plus two adapted such scales assessing how much respondents feel that they are respected in society and are a person of good moral character in relation to others (10point scale). _Social and financial support_ is assessed with two items asking how many people the respondent could ask for advice on their economic activity and if they experience an interpersonal conflict and an item on their perceived probability of being able to amass a small sum of money in emergencies (1=Not at all likely to 4=Very likely). _Social cohesion and community closeness_ is assessed with four items: how many people out of ten in the village the respondent feels they can trust (10-point scale), how many enemies (someone who “wishes you to fail or would try to sabotage their progress”) they perceive they have (1=No one to 4=A lot), how much they feel it is their duty to sacrifice for their community even at their own expense (1=No, not at all to 4=Yes, definitely), and how close they feel toward their community (4-point scale of Inclusion of Other in Self (IOS) Scale) (Aron et al., 1992).

We assess _household decision-making_ with 4 items: three capturing how much women feel that their opinion matters in decisions related to their own earnings, daily spending, and nonagricultural businesses (1=Does not matter at all to 3=Matters a lot) and whether the household has prevented the respondent from working outside the home in the last 12 months (0=Yes, 1=No). _Partner dynamics_ was captured with one item assessing how close respondents feel towards their partner (4-point, IOS measure) and one item assessing how comfortable they feel telling their partner that they disagree with them (1=Never to 4=Most of the time). _Household dynamics_ was captured with items assessing how close respondents feel towards their household (4-point, IOS measure), how respected they feel by their household in regards to their economic activity (1=No, not at all to 4=Yes, a lot), and how much they have experienced household tension in the last six months (1=No, not at all to 4=Yes, a lot). We construct a summary _relational outcomes composite index_ across all other-oriented outcomes.

**_Other._** We assess _redistributive preferences_ with three items assessing sharing-oriented attitudes and behaviors (how much alms respondents have given to the less fortunate in their community in the last two months, what percentage of any extra yields would they share with

> 17 This index included three additional variables than those pre-registered in order to match the construction of the business outcomes index in Bossuroy et al. (2022). These included measures of the number of days worked, having a business, and healthy business practices index.

41