# C. FAIS impact on nonmonetary dimensions of poverty, part 1

||_Electr_|_icity_|_Sewerage_||_Water_|_Floor_|||_Toilet_|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
||_Unweighted_|_Weighted_|_Unweighted_|_Weighted_|_Unweighted_|_Unweighted_|_Weighted_|_Unweighted_|_Weighted_|
|FAIS ∞|3.107***|2.958***|8.356***|7.575***|9.067***|11.27***|7.400***|0.954|1.845**|
||(0.429)|(0.774)|(1.025)|(1.207)|(1.019)|(0.861)|(1.210)|(0.599)|(0.867)|
|Own revenues ∞|0.0245|−0.147|0.0129|−0.155|0.536*|−1.710***|−0.458|−0.0726|−0.0749|
||(0.119)|(0.209)|(0.306)|(0.373)|(0.298)|(0.307)|(0.473)|(0.157)|(0.237)|
|Unconditional revenue ∞|−1.426***|−0.648|−4.378***|−3.003***|−3.604***|−3.662***|−1.813*|−0.392|0.410|
||(0.334)|(0.537)|(0.798)|(0.840)|(0.869)|(0.866)|(0.979)|(0.450)|(0.568)|
|Conditional revenue ∞|−0.524***|−0.117|−2.178***|−1.467***|−2.092***|−3.632***|−2.233***|−0.245|−0.445|
||(0.181)|(0.239)|(0.442)|(0.459)|(0.444)|(0.459)|(0.519)|(0.243)|(0.285)|
|Direct workers ‡|−3.520**|−0.181|3.259|12.90**|−8.907*|0.367|11.28**|11.17***|8.202**|
||(1.729)|(3.370)|(6.241)|(5.327)|(4.747)|(5.737)|(5.618)|(3.238)|(3.543)|
|Indirect workers ‡|2.532|16.55*|−34.71***|−111.7***|−24.21***|−60.44***|−168.4***|−9.402**|−32.88***|
||(3.151)|(9.341)|(8.565)|(17.17)|(7.444)|(14.14)|(19.91)|(4.601)|(9.581)|
|Productivity per occupied ‡‡|0.104|0.0774|0.197|0.0892|−0.142|−0.197|−1.062***|−0.0359|−0.443*|
||(0.143)|(0.167)|(0.345)|(0.309)|(0.351)|(0.355)|(0.375)|(0.171)|(0.242)|
|Private business assets ‡‡|0.0397|0.116|0.706***|1.183***|0.299|0.961***|1.836***|0.0966|0.658***|
||(0.125)|(0.137)|(0.245)|(0.260)|(0.258)|(0.305)|(0.272)|(0.147)|(0.189)|
|Semiurban|−0.541|−0.927|−0.705|−0.356|2.065|3.553|4.095|−1.127|−1.207|
||(0.910)|(1.128)|(2.098)|(2.035)|(1.798)|(2.233)|(2.561)|(1.001)|(1.000)|
|City|−0.541|−1.233|−0.433|1.975|1.792|3.060|6.710**|−0.579|−0.603|
||(0.983)|(1.209)|(2.268)|(2.243)|(2.059)|(2.500)|(2.805)|(1.182)|(1.207)|
|Year 2010|2.868***|3.710***|5.689***|3.895***|−0.218|10.28***|5.705***|5.184***|5.202***|
||(0.104)|(0.163)|(0.315)|(0.260)|(0.311)|(0.361)|(0.371)|(0.138)|(0.174)|
|Year 2014|4.910***|4.827***|12.07***|8.679***|10.97***|15.40***|10.61***|8.364***|7.687***|
||(0.157)|(0.242)|(0.379)|(0.407)|(0.402)|(0.412)|(0.498)|(0.195)|(0.268)|
|N|6,107|6,107|6,107|6,107|6,107|6,107|6,107|6,107|6,107|
|R-2|0.407|0.608|0.360|0.375|0.346|0.474|0.398|0.500|0.651|
|Municipalities|2,118|2,118|2,118|2,118|2,118|2,118|2,118|2,118|2,118|

_Note:_ Semiurban refers to municipalities with a population between 2,500 and 15,000. City refers to municipalities with more than 15,000 inhabitants. The average income corresponds to the average per capita household income in each municipality in logarithms. The deciles of income correspond to the cut-off points of dividing in each municipality the households into ten equal groups and is expressed in logarithms. All monetary values were in real terms in August 2014. Model with fixed effects by the municipality and by year for 2005, 2010, and 2014, also using the FAIS formulated as the instrumental variable. The nonmonetary dimensions are expressed in 0–100, understanding 100 as 100% of coverage. Weighed results show the same model adding importance by the size of the municipal population. ∞ Fiscal revenue items in the logarithm of the average monthly per capita value three previous years. ‡ Occupied per inhabitant, employees of the economic units or indirect workers, reported in the economic census of the circa year. ‡ ‡ Productivity by the total of occupied and active of the economic units of each municipality. Standard error in parentheses. *** p < .01 ** p < .05 * p < .1 41