**Table OA9: NAIVS program awareness and implementation**

||Awareness of NAIVS<br>program<br> <br>(1)|Asked about ability to<br>pay in 2010/11<br>(2)|Household received<br>vouchers in 2010/11<br>(3)|Satisfaction with selection of<br>beneficiaries in 2010/11<br>(4)|Household received<br>vouchers in 2011/12<br>(5)|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|Beneficiary|0.092|0.065|0.295***|0.197***|0.161**|
||_0.105_|_0.399_|_0.000_|_0.000_|_0.044_|
|Meeting & Lottery village|0.063|0.044|0.094|0.217***|0.092|
||_0.256_|_0.499_|_0.160_|_0.004_|_0.183_|
|Lottery village|0.033|0.027|0.064|0.168**|-0.017|
||_0.528_|_0.642_|_0.369_|_0.011_|_0.803_|
|Meeting village|0.023|-0.013|0.013|0.161**|-0.025|
||_0.717_|_0.835_|_0.884_|_0.034_|_0.787_|
|Beneficiary x M&L|-0.033|-0.035|-0.067|-0.228**|-0.063|
||_0.603_|_0.674_|_0.445_|_0.016_|_0.481_|
|Beneficiary x Lottery|0.004|0.048|0.033|-0.085|0.112|
||_0.949_|_0.598_|_0.696_|_0.297_|_0.238_|
|Beneficiary x Meeting|0.011|0.028|0.090|-0.079|0.018|
||_0.872_|_0.766_|_0.344_|_0.495_|_0.841_|
|Number of households|920|920|920|920|920|
|R-squared|0.031|0.013|0.104|0.032|0.043|
|Mean of DepVar in Control|0.887|0.172|0.267|0.715|0.264|
|_P-val of B = Non-B in..._||||||
|Meeting & Lottery village|_0.553_|_0.546_|_0.039_|_0.267_|_0.200_|
|Lottery village|_0.019_|_0.063_|_0.000_|_0.082_|_0.000_|
|Meetingvillage|_0.020_|_0.118_|_0.000_|_0.255_|_0.011_|

Note: This table reports the estimation of the following specification: _y ij = α ij + β 1 Beneficiary ij + β 2 ML+ β 3 L j + β 4 M j + β 5 Beneficiary ij *ML j + β 6 Beneficiary ij *L j + β 7 Beneficiary ij *M j + ε ij_ , where _i_ indexes the individual (household) and _j_ indexes the village. _Beneficiary ij_ is a dummy that takes value of 1 if the individual _i_ in village _j_ is a beneficiary of the NAIVS voucher program in 2010/11. Variables _ML j_ , _L j_ and _M j_ are dummies that take value of 1 if village _j_ is under both interventions, only second intervention and only first intervention, respectively. The models presented here represent an intention to treat analysis and are not adjusted for any baseline covariates. Dependent variables are constructed based on questions asked on follow-up household survey. The dependent variable in Column 1 is a dummy that indicates whether respondent is aware of the presence of the NAIVS program in his or her village. Column 2 reports the results using a dummy that codes whether the respondent was asked about his or her ability to pay for the voucher top-up in 2010/11. In Columns 3 and 5, the dependent variables are dummies that indicates if respondent reports receiving vouchers in 2010/11 and 2011/12, respectively. For those regressions, respondents self-report receiving or not voucher and the answers may differ from administrative data used to assign beneficiary status. In Column 4, the dependent variable in Column 4 is a dummy variable that indicates whether the respondent reports being very satisfied with the selection of voucher beneficiaries in 2010/11. P-values are computed using the t-asymptotic wild cluster bootstrap procedure described in Cameron et al. (2008) and reported below the coefficients. Clustering was done at the village level. ***,**,* denote statistical significance at the 1, 5 and 10 percent level, respectively. See Appendix Table 1 for definition of variables.