<!-- Start of picture text --> r_ Policy R orh<br>Poualn, Health, and Nutrition<br>WPS 1046<br><!-- End of picture text --> Thispaper-aproductofthe Health and Nutrition Divis -n, Populationand Human Resources Department - is part of a larger effort in the department to dissemLa&te Bank-funded population, health, and nutrition research. Copies of the paper are available free from the World Bank, 1818 **H** Street NW, Washington, DC 20433. Please contact Otilia Nadora, room **S6-065,** extension 31091 (November 1992, 16 pages).

This report on World Bank project-financed research on population, health, and nutrition (PuN) iL based on a review of 109 staff appraisal reports for projects finarnced in fiscal 1980-91 and on selected interviews with task managers. The **report** looks at only the simplest dimensions of project-financed research and examines research outcomes of only a few projects. Among conclusions tentatively reached:

* More than 90 percent of PHN projects from fiscal 1980-91 financed research.

* Bank experience with project-financed research in the PHN sector has been extremely variable: quite successful in some countries and almost a total failure in others. Even so, some striking successes justify continued efforts to incorporate research into projects and to encourage use of that research to improve both national PHN policy and follow-on Bank-financed projects.

* Personalities make a difference, both among borrowers and within the Bank. Often successes are associated with a particular person within the govemment or the Bank who has taken a continuing personal interest in encouraging research.

* Supervision is crucial to good results. Supervision must be frequent enough to keep the

research component on time and of good quality. For quality research to be completed, it is important that those responsible for supervision attach a high priority to research even if it is not a large part of the project in terms of budget.

* Research that leads to a project outcomesuch as research needed to justify release of - funds or for a follow-on project is more likely to be undertaken and completed than is research with a more general objective.

I in countries where the institutional capability exists, using a national institution to review research proposals and to administer research grants can be quite effective. Experience indicates that some sort of peer-group review oroduces better research.

* There is probably room for more bestpractices workshops where PHN staff can exchange experiences about successful design and supervision of project-financed research components. But usually it will be necessary to retain experienced consultants to help design substantial research components.

* More systematic collection and dissemination of project-financed research is justified, given the considerable amounts of money and effort devoted to it.

The Policy Research Working Paper Series disseminates the **fmdings** of work under way im the Bank. Anobjective of the series is to get these findings out quickly, even if presentations are less than fully polished. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions in these papers do not necessarily represent official Bank policy.

Produced by **the** Policy Research Dissemination Center