**<u>Table 3: Village level evidence on the certification process</u>**

||**Total**|**Tigray**|**Amhara**|**Oromia**|**SNNPR**|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
||**Sample**|||||
|**Timing and coverage**||||||
|Years since land use committee established|3.08|10.99|3.58|2.29|1.46|
|Years since registration started|2.55|8.33|2.73|2.17|1.63|
|Years since registration was completed|2.22|7.05|2.07|1.53|1.15|
|Duration of registration (months) if complete|9.56|22.50|8.38|8.36|8.16|
|Months betw registration & certificate issuance|16.00|15.00|15.21|15.87|17.33|
|<br>Any preliminary registration documents (%)?|48.15|75.00|66.67|38.00|39.13|
|Any certificates distributed (%)?|46.30|87.50|37.04|38.00|60.87|
|<br>**Land use committee (LAC)**||||||
|Established through popular election|91.67|100.00|85.19|96.00|86.96|
|<br>No. of committee members|12.19|20.88|13.96|9.42|13.09|
|Share of sub-kebeles represented (%)|81.10|63.32|94.75|82.36|68.54|
|<br>Any women in the committee (%)|20.37|25.00|33.33|8.00|30.43|
|<br>Any members with leadership position (%)|69.44|50.00|74.07|70.00|69.57|
|<br>LAC got training before start of registration (%)|87.96|100.00|92.59|98.00|56.52|
|LAC got training after registration started (%)|47.22|37.50|70.37|44.00|30.43|
|**Meetings and written dissemination**||||||
|Public meetings before start of registration (%)|92.59|75.00|100.00|92.00|91.30|
|Public meetings after start of registration (%)|62.96|75.00|70.37|54.00|69.57|
|LAC got copies of proclamation (%)|65.74|75.00|96.30|50.00|60.87|
|<br>LAC got other written material (%)|10.19|12.50|22.22|4.00|8.70|
|Kebele officials got copies of proclamation (%)|53.70|75.00|74.07|42.00|47.83|
|<br>Kebele officials got other written material (%)|7.41|12.50|18.52|4.00|0.00|
|<br>Community members got proclamation (%)|5.56|12.50|11.11|0.00|8.70|
|<br>Community members got written material (%)|2.78|12.50|0.00|2.00|4.35|
|**Coverage and field processes**||||||
|(Sub)-kebele boundaries identified & mapped|62.04|37.50|70.37|52.00|82.61|
|Common property resources mapped|38.89|25.00|44.44|26.00|65.22|
|Are house plots registered in kebele?|46.96|0.00|62.96|53.85|37.50|
|<br>Measurement done by tape/rope (%)|77.78|100.00|33.33|90.00|95.65|
|Measurement by eye/pacing (%)|15.74|0.00|48.15|8.00|0.00|
|Elders played significant role in adjudication|69.90|62.50|62.50|77.08|65.22|
|<br>Any woreda official present (%)|55.56|75.00|62.96|44.00|65.22|
|<br>Neighbors present(%)|82.41|100.00|74.07|84.00|82.61|
|<br>**Conflicts and sustainability**||||||
|<br>Any problem in process (%)|58.33|50.00|66.67|52.00|65.22|
|Any cases of encroachment on public land (%)?|37.96|87.50|55.56|28.00|21.74|
|If yes, solution was leaving things for later|40.74|25.00|41.67|37.50|66.67|
|Any holders that could not be registered in field (%)|36.11|12.50|40.74|28.00|56.52|
|Share of holders who could not be registered in field (%)|3.31|0.69|2.35|4.29|3.22|
|<br>Any cases where registration form disputed (%)|35.19|25.00|37.04|34.00|39.13|
|<br>Any cases of certificate could not be awarded (%)|36.11|12.50|51.85|32.00|34.78|
|<br>Share of holders who did not receive a certificate (%)<sup>43</sup>|4.37|0.13|11.19|3.64|2.33|
|<br>Any cases where certificate disputed|34.26|12.50|48.15|28.00|39.13|
|<br>**Interest in follow up**||||||
|<br>Households interested in second stage?|82.41|100.00|85.19|80.00|78.26|
|<br>if yes, willing to pay?|90.22|90.91|82.61|97.50|83.33|
|<br>if yes, how much (B)|12.55|5.00|9.45|16.21|11.93|
|Any interest in having house plots registered|74.07|87.50|70.37|72.00|78.26|
|Ifyes,willingness topay?|85.54|88.89|84.21|97.22|63.16|

_Source:_ Own computation from 2006 EEA/WB Land certification survey.

> 43 Figures may be higher than those for holders who could not be registered as the figure is computed only for kebeles where certificates have been issued.

23