Table 3. Impact on EDI outcomes for the younger cohort

|**Outcome**|**Survey**<br>**Year**||**All**|**Poor**|**Non-poor**|**Low**<br>**Parenting**<br>**Score**|**High**<br>**Parenting**<br>**Score**|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|||Coeff.|0.208***|0.115|0.267***|0.151*|0.275***|
||2013|(S.E.)|(0.051)|(0.082)|(0.059)|(0.064)|(0.072)|
|||Comp. mean|-0.149|-0.118|-0.172|-0.191|-0.102|
|Physical health and||Obs.|2,770|1,194|1,576|1,533|1,237|
|well-being (SD)||Coeff.|0.023|0.113|-0.047|0.013|0.025|
||2016|(S.E.)|(0.065)|(0.103)|(0.060)|(0.085)|(0.069)|
|||Comp. mean|0.00610|-0.170|0.136|-0.153|0.174|
|||Obs.|2,877|1,279|1,598|1,823|1,054|
|||Coeff.|0.018|0.080|-0.031|0.014|0.016|
||21|(S.E.)|(0.053)|(0.082)|(0.058)|(0.056)|(0.079)|
||03|Comp. mean|0.00112|-0.192|0.140|-0.139|0.157|
|il||Obs.|2,769|1,192|1,577|1,534|1,235|
|Soca competence (SD)||Coeff.|0.008|0.052|-0.023|-0.036|0.040|
||2016|(S.E.)|(0.049)|(0.067)|(0.058)|(0.070)|(0.059)|
|||Comp. mean|0.0284|-0.0539|0.0892|-0.249|0.321|
|||Obs.|2,877|1,279|1,598|1,823|1,054|
|||Coeff.|0.115*|0.241**|0.025|0.115|0.114|
||2013|(S.E.)|(0.056)|(0.082)|(0.057)|(0.076)|(0.059)|
|||Comp. mean|-0.110|-0.228|-0.0251|-0.333|0.138|
|Etil tit SD||Obs.|2,770|1,193|1,577|1,534|1,236|
|moona maury ()||Coeff.|0.020|0.098|-0.042|-0.021|0.049|
|||(S.E.)|(0.046)|(0.061)|(0.058)|(0.064)|(0.059)|
||2016|Comp. mean|-0.00663|-0.145|0.0955|-0.305|0.307|
|||Obs.|2,877|1,279|1,598|1,823|1,054|
|||Coeff.|0.073|0.098|0.043|0.098|0.051|
||2013|(S.E.)|(0.056)|(0.084)|(0.061)|(0.064)|(0.074)|
|||Comp. mean|-0.0502|-0.285|0.117|-0.154|0.0648|
|Language and cognitive||Obs.|2,770|1,193|1,577|1,534|1,236|
|development (SD)||Coeff.|0.080|0.078|0.090|0.085|0.067|
||21|(S.E.)|(0.049)|(0.074)|(0.056)|(0.067)|(0.067)|
||06|Comp. mean|-0.0371|-0.110|0.0169|-0.103|0.0324|
|||Obs.|2,877|1,279|1,598|1,823|1,054|
|||Coeff.|-0.005|-0.095|0.055|-0.069|0.067|
|||(S.E.)|(0.074)|(0.101)|(0.076)|(0.081)|(0.091)|
||2013|<br>Comp. mean|<br>0.0159|<br>-0.0462|<br>0.0603|<br>0.00577|<br>0.0271|
|Communication skills<br>d l kld||<br>Obs.|2,771|1,194|1,577|1,534|1,237|
|an genera nowege<br>||Coeff.|-0.136*|-0.145*|-0.123|-0.153|-0.127|
|(SD)||(S.E.)|(0.061)|(0.072)|(0.074)|(0.078)|(0.067)|
||2016|Comp. mean|0.131|0.137|0.127|-0.0184|0.289|
|||Obs.|2,877|1,279|1,598|1,823|1,054|

p<0.001***; p<0.01**; p<0.05* Note: Each cell-block is the result of a separate regression. Standard errors clustered at the village level are in parentheses. “Comp. mean” refers to the comparison group mean for the outcome variable. Column (1) regressions control for child characteristics (age, household size, household wealth asset index, parenting practices, mother's education and gender) and baseline child development measures (BMI, cognitive, fine motor, gross motor, and language). Columns (2) and (3) regressions use the same controls as column (1) except they exclude household wealth. Columns (4) and (5) regressions use the same controls as column (1) except they exclude parenting practices.

In Table 4, we find mixed results of the project on primary school test scores, which were measured at age 8 (2016). We find large positive effects (0.134 S.D.) on language items involved with selecting a picture whose name began with a different letter to other pictures 13