**Table   V:   School   Fees   -­‐   Impact   by   Provider   Quality   and   Type**

|||||<br>**Fees(Year**|<br>**2)**|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
||**Fees (Year 2)**||**Continuous**<br>**Quality**|**Binary**<br>**Quality**|**Binary Quality**<br>**(Household Report)**|
||(1)||(2)|(3)|(4)|
|Report Card (RC)|-0.139|Report Card (RC)|-111.6|-42.70|78.58|
||(0.0916)||(76.40)|(88.65)|(145.2)|
|School Score (Score)<br>|0.244**<br>(0.114)|School Score (Score)<br>|195.9<br>(162.9)<br>|||
|RC * Score<br>|0.0389<br>(0.150)|RC * Score<br>|-281.6*<br>(163.0)|||
|Score * Post<br>|0.0544<br>(0.129)<br>|High * Private||232.2*<br>(121.3)<br>|530.2***<br>(189.0)<br>|
|RC * Score * Post|-0.368**<br>(0.179)<br>|RC*High*Private||-293.8**<br>(129.0)|-511.4**<br>(207.1)|
|Post|-0.177|Baseline|0.683***|0.681***|0.488***|
||(0.323)||(0.122)|(0.117)|(0.125)|
|RC * Post|0.121<br>(0.109)|||||
|Controls|Village||Village|Village|Village|
|Observations<br>|555||274|274|238|
|R-Squared|0.311||0.584<br>|0.585<br>|0.402<br>|
|||SUBGROUP POINT EST<br>|IMATE,F-TESTp-|VALUES IN BRACKE<br>|TS|
|||Low private school||-42.70|78.58|
|||||[0.631]<br>|[0.590]<br>|
|||High private school||-336.5|-432.9|
|||||[0.000]|[0.000]|
|Baseline Fee(mean)|6.911||1188.482|1188.482|1047.882|

# _Notes:_

*   significant   at   10   percent   level   **significant   at   5   percent   level   ***   significant   at   1   percent   level The   outcome   variables   are:   Year   2   private   school   fees   -­‐   in   logs   (column   1);   Year   2   private   school   fees   from   school   survey   data   -­‐   in   levels (column   2   and   3);   and   Year   2   private   school   fees   from   household   survey   data   (column   4).   Column   1   data   is   from   the   school   survey   and   is constructed   in   a   panel   format   to   test   whether   the   price-­‐quality   gradient   falls   as   a   result   of   the   intervention;   we   thus   see   roughly   double   the number   of   observations   in   Column   1   compared   to   Columns   2   and   3.   The   coefficient   of   interest   in   the   triple   interaction   terms

(RC*Score*Post).  Column  2  considers  continuous  quality  whereas  Columns  3  and  4  consider  binary  quality  with  schools  defined  as  high quality  if  they  are  in  the  top  40th  percentile  of  the  test  score  distribution.  The  number  of  observations  is  less  than  303  private  schools  due to  missing/inconsistent  fee  data  and  private  school  closure  in  Round  2.  Column  4  has  even  fewer  observations  because  we  only  use  data from  those  households  with  children  in  private  schools  who  we  tested  and  were  able  to  match  in  our  testing  roster.  All  regressions  include district-­‐fixed  effects  and  cluster  standard  errors  at  the  village  level.  Additional  village  level  controls,  the  same  ones  listed  in  Table  II,  are used  in  all  regressions.  The  lower  panel  displays  the  estimated  coefficients  and  p-­‐values  [in  square  brackets]  for  relevant  subgroups obtained  from  the  coefficients  estimated  in  the  top  panel.  Baseline  Fee  (Mean)  displays  the  baseline  fee  mean  for  the  sample  across  all regressions.

38