Table A-4: Fiscal Transfers under Alternative EquaLization Schemes (Yuan)

||100% Equ|aLization|50% Equa|lization|20% Equ|alization||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
||--------|--------|- -------|---------|- -----|----------|-- ActuaL|
||Per cap<br>transfer|Differ.<br>from<br>act. amt.|Per cap<br>transfe<br>|Differ.<br>r from<br>act. amt|Per cap<br>transfe<br>.|Differ.<br>r from<br>act. amt.|per cap<br>transfer<br> <br>1994|
|All China|135.0|<br>0.0|<br>135.0|<br>0.0|<br>135.0|<br>0.0|135.0|
|Beijing|-416.6|-884.9|<br>25.8|<br>-442.4|<br>291.3|-177.0|468.3|
|Tianjin|-160.6|-397.7|<br>38.2|<br>-198.9|<br>157.6|<br>-79.5|237.1|
|<br>Hebei|157.9|<br>55.2|<br>130.3|<br>27.6|<br>113.8|<br>11.0|102.7|
|Shanxi|109.3|<br>-7.0|<br>112.8|<br>-3.5|<br>114.9|<br>-1.4|116.3|
|Inner Mongolia|208.0|<br>-42.1|<br>229.0|<br>-21.1|<br>241.7|<br>-8.4|250.1|
|Liaoning|-6.9|<br>-178.8|<br>82.5|<br>-89.4|<br>136.1|<br>-35.8|171.9|
|Jilin|91.5|<br>-115.7|<br>149.3|<br>-57.8|<br>184.0|<br>-23.1|207.1|
|Heilongjiang|36.6|<br>-120.7|<br>96.9|<br>-60.3|<br>133.1|<br>-24.1|157.2|
|Shanghai|-637.5|-793.9|-240.5|-397.0|<br>-2.3|-158.8|156.5|
|Jiangsu|64.6|<br>-25.9|<br>77.6|<br>-13.0|<br>85.3|<br>-5.2|90.5|
|Zhejiang|65.8|<br>-70.2|<br>100.9|<br>-35.1|<br>122.0|<br>-14.0|136.0|
|Anhui|182.3|<br>117.5|<br>123.6|<br>58.8|<br>88.3|<br>23.5|64.8|
|Fujian|183.6|<br>39.7|<br>163.7|<br>19.8|<br>151.8|<br>7.9|143.9|
|Jiangxi|181.5|<br>75.1|<br>144.0|<br>37.5|<br>121.5|<br>15.0|106.5|
|<br>Shandong|87.6|<br>-9.4|<br>92.3|<br>-4.7|<br>95.1|<br>-1.9|97.0|
|Henan|146.7|<br>62.2|<br>115.6|<br>31.1|<br>96.9|<br>12.4|84.5|
|Hubei|136.2|<br>31.8|<br>120.4|<br>15.9|<br>110.8|<br>6.4|104.5|
|Hunan|192.8|<br>89.6|<br>148.0|<br>44.8|<br>121.1|<br>17.9|103.2|
|Guangdong|121.1|<br>-55.5|<br>148.9|<br>-27.7|<br>165.5|<br>-11.1|176.6|
|Guangxi|225.0|<br>85.5|<br>182.3|<br>42.8|<br>156.6|<br>17.1|139.5|
|Hainan|287.9|<br>112.4|<br>231.7|<br>56.2|<br>198.0|<br>22.5|175.5|
|Sichuan|185.7|<br>95.3|<br>138.1|<br>47.6|<br>109.5|<br>19.1|90.4|
|Guizhou|268.0|<br>143.7|<br>196.2|<br>71.8|<br>153.1|<br>28.7|124.3|
|Yunnan|159.1|-163.4|<br>240.8|<br>-81.7|<br>289.8|<br>-32.7|322.5|
|Tibet|1622.8|<br>573.7|1336.0|<br>286.8|1163.9|<br>114.7|1049.2|
|Shaanxi|188.7|<br>65.4|<br>156.0|<br>32.7|<br>136.4|<br>13.1|123.3|
|Gansu|265.2|<br>83.1|<br>223.6|<br>41.6|<br>198.7|<br>16.6|182.1|
|Qinghai|486.5|<br>99.4|<br>436.8|<br>49.7|<br>407.0|<br>19.9|387.1|
|Ningxia|218.0|<br>-24.2|<br>230.1|<br>-12.1|<br>237.4|<br>-4.8|242.3|
|<br>Xinjiang|376.7|<br>116.9|<br>318.3|<br>58.4|<br>283.2|<br>23.4|259.8|
|SD||263.5||131.8||52.7||
|C.O.V.||1.95||0.98||0.39||

Note: 100 percent equaLization means that 100 percent of the actuaL centraL government transfers (net) made to the localities in 1994 are allocated by the proposed equalization formuLa using cost adjusted fiscal need measurmenl:s.

50 percenit equalization means that 50 percent of the actual central government transfers (net) made to the localities in 1994 are aLlocated in proportion to the original allocation and the other 50 percent are allocated by the proposed equaLization formuLa using cost adjusted figures.

20 percenit equalization means that 80 percent of the actual centraL government transfers (net) made to the localities in 1994 are allocated in proportion to the originaL allocation and the other 20 percent are aLlocated by the proposed equaLization formuLa using cost adjusted figures. SD: standard deviation; C.O.V.: coefficient of variations.

63