# **Table 5: Displacement and elite capture**

||Gives inputs to<br>others|Used inorganic<br>fertilizers in<br>2009/10|<br>Used improved<br>seeds in<br>2009/10|Related to<br>government<br>officials and<br>influentials|Socializes with<br>government<br>officials and<br>influentials|Paid to become<br>beneficiary in<br>2010/11|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
||(1)|(2)|(3)|(4)|(5)|(6)|
|Beneficiary|-0.024|0.129*|0.031|-0.040|-0.019|0.004|
||_0.605_|_0.077_|_0.634_|_0.465_|_0.735_|_0.838_|
|Lottery|-0.086**|0.135|0.119|0.006|0.008|0.012|
||_0.014_|_0.139_|_0.129_|_0.915_|_0.886_|_0.269_|
|Lottery x Beneficiary|0.112**|-0.265***|-0.042|0.079|0.052|0.002|
||_0.041_|_0.005_|_0.663_|_0.309_|_0.518_|_0.910_|
|Number of contacts|523||||||
|Number of households|294|427|427|427|427|920|
|R-squared|0.017|0.019|0.010|0.007|0.004|0.003|
|Mean of dep. var. for NB in NL vil.|0.103|0.286|0.469|0.153|0.133|0.009|
|P-val of B = NB in L villages|_0.017_|_0.031_|_0.875_|_0.490_|_0.562_|_0.694_|
|Note: In Column 1, we report the estimation<br>individual (household),_j_ indexes the village a<br>specification:_y ij = α ij + β 1 Beneficiary ij + β _<br>dummy that takes value of 1 if the individual_i_ <br>village _j_ were chosen among the eligible hou<br>covariates. The dependent variable in Colum<br>dependent variables in Column 2 and 3 are d<br>using household survey data collected at basel<br>position of or being related to and having regu<br>Column 6 is a dummy variable that takes val<br>Columns 1 and 6 were collected using house<br>asymptotic wild cluster bootstrap procedure d<br>statistical significance at the 1, 5 and 10 percen|of the following specific<br>nd_k_ indexes another ind<br>_2 Lottery j + β 3 Lottery j _<br> in village_j_ is a benefici<br>seholds though a lottery<br>n 1 is a dummy variabl<br>ummy variables that tak<br>ine. In Columns 4 and <br>lar social interaction wit<br>ue 1 if respondent repo<br>hold survey at follow-up<br>escribed in Cameron et <br>t level, respectively. Se|ation:_y ijk = α ijk + _<br>ividual reported to<br>_*Beneficiary ij + ε ij_ <br>ary of the NAIVS v<br>. The models prese<br>e that takes value 1<br>e value 1 if the resp<br>5, the dependent var<br>h DALDO, WEO, V<br>rts at follow-up ho<br> while data in Col<br> al. (2008) and rep<br>e Appendix Table 1|_β 1 Beneficiary ij + β_<br>be in the respondent's<br>, where_i_ indexes the<br>oucher program in 2<br>nted here represent <br> if the respondent re<br>ondent reports using<br>iables are dummies t<br>EO, VVC member,<br>usehold survey havin<br>umns 2-5 come from <br>orted below the coef<br>for definition of vari|_2 Lottery j + β 3 L_<br>network. In Colu<br>individual (house<br>010/11._Lottery j_ i<br>an intention to tre<br>ported giving agr<br> improved seeds a<br>hat takes value 1 <br>or Village or Ham<br>g paid to become<br> household survey<br>ficients. Clusterin<br>ables.|_ottery j *Beneficiary ij +_<br>mns 2-6 we report the e<br>hold) and_j_ indexes the<br>s a dummy that takes va<br>at analysis and are not <br>icultural inputs to a no<br>nd inorganic fertilizers<br> if respondent reports al<br>let Chair, respectively.<br> a voucher beneficiary<br> at baseline. P-values <br>g was done at the villa|_ε ijk_, where_i_ indexes the<br>stimation of the following<br>village._Beneficiary ij_ is a<br>lue of 1 if beneficiaries in<br> adjusted for any baseline<br>n-beneficiary friend. The<br> in 2009/10, respectively,<br>so at baseline holding the<br>The dependent variable in<br> in 2010/11. Data for the<br>are computed using the t-<br>ge level. ***,**,* denote|