# **Tables**

Table 1: Difference-in-Difference - Share of Informal Residents

||(1)|(2)|(3)|(4)|(5)|(6)|(7)|(8)|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|Outcome:|∆(ln_LF −_ln_LI_)|∆(ln_LF −_ln_L_|_I_)<br>∆(ln_LF −_ln_LI_)|∆(ln_LF −_ln_LI_)|∆(ln_LF −_ln_LI_)|∆(ln_LF −_ln_LI_)|∆(ln_LF −_ln_LI_|)<br>∆(ln_LF −_ln_LI_)|
||||_Panel A: Continuous t_|_reatment measure-_|_Pool of residents_||||
|- ln distance|0.040***|0.054***|0.045***|0.058***|0.014*|0.030***|0.018**|0.035***|
||(0.007)|(0.008)|(0.008)|(0.008)|(0.008)|(0.008)|(0.009)|(0.009)|
|Observations|3,192|3,192|3,192|3,192|3,192|3,192|3,192|3,192|
|R-squared|0.162|0.248|0.162|0.248|0.230|0.300|0.230|0.301|
||||_Panel B: Treatment _|_dummy variable-Po_|_ol of residents_||||
|_Ti_|0.038**|0.069***|0.033**|0.067***|0.024|0.068***|0.016|0.064***|
||(0.016)|(0.016)|(0.016)|(0.016)|(0.018)|(0.016)|(0.018)|(0.017)|
|Observations|3,192|3,192|3,192|3,192|3,192|3,192|3,192|3,192|
|R-squared|0.156|0.241|0.156|0.240|0.230|0.300|0.230|0.300|
|||_P_|_anel C: Continuous tre_|_atment measure-Lo_|_w skilled residents_||||
|-ln distance|0.049***|0.056***|0.053***|0.060***|0.017*|0.032***|0.021**|0.036***|
||(0.008)|(0.008)|(0.008)|(0.008)|(0.009)|(0.008)|(0.010)|(0.009)|
|Observations|3,192|3,192|3,192|3,192|3,192|3,192|3,192|3,192|
|R-squared|0.137|0.230|0.138|0.230|0.203|0.281|0.203|0.282|
||||_Panel D: Treatment d_|_ummy variable-Low _|_skilled residents_||||
|_Ti_|0.051***|0.071***|0.046***|0.069***|0.027|0.068***|0.019|0.065***|
||(0.017)|(0.016)|(0.017)|(0.016)|(0.019)|(0.017)|(0.019)|(0.017)|
|Observations|3,192|3,192|3,192|3,192|3,192|3,192|3,192|3,192|
|R-squared|0.130|0.222|0.130|0.221|0.202|0.281|0.202|0.281|
||||_Panel E: Continuous_|_treatment measure_|_-Outskirt area_||||
|-ln distance|0.072***|0.088***|0.079***|0.095***|0.037***|0.050***|0.041***|0.055***|
||(0.009)|(0.009)|(0.010)|(0.010)|(0.010)|(0.009)|(0.011)|(0.010)|
|Observations|2,171|2,171|2,171|2,171|2,171|2,171|2,171|2,171|
|R-squared|0.199|0.279|0.200|0.279|0.279|0.338|0.280|0.338|
||||_Panel F: Treatmen_|_t dummy variable-_|_Outskirt area_||||
|_Ti_|0.076***|0.138***|0.066***|0.131***|0.062***|0.110***|0.048**|0.099***|
||(0.021)|(0.019)|(0.022)|(0.019)|(0.023)|(0.021)|(0.024)|(0.022)|
|Observations|2,171|2,171|2,171|2,171|2,171|2,171|2,171|2,171|
|R-squared|0.185|0.264|0.184|0.262|0.277|0.336|0.276|0.335|
|Distance|Meters|Minutes|Meters|Minutes|Meters|Minutes|Meters|Minutes|
|Dist.+Prod. Controls|X|X|X|X|X|X|X|X|
|Population Controls||X||X||X||X|
|State FE|X|X|X|X|||||
|Municipality FE|||||X|X|X|X|

_Notes:_ This table reports the results of a regression relating changes in the share of informal residents in each location with the line B of the subway. Panel A reports the results for the continuous treatment measures and the pool of residents, panel B for the treatment dummy variables and the pool of residents, panel C for the continuous treatment measure and low-skilled workers, panel D for the treatment dummy variables and low skilled workers, panel E for the continuous treatment measure on the locations that are not in the CBD, and panel F for the treatment dummy variable on the locations that are not in the CBD. In the first four columns, I include state-time fixed effects, and in the fifth column to the eight column municipality-time fixed effects. The regressions are weighted by the population in 2000. Standard errors are clustered at the census tract level and reported in parentheses. * _p <_ 0 _._ 1, ** _p <_ 0 _._ 05, *** _p <_ 0 _._ 01.

48