# **Table 3.  The Export Response to Antidumping Imposed by High Income versus Emerging Markets: Real Exports**

||_F_<br>(total<br>High<br>|_ull Sample_<br>AD cases=74<br>|6)|_Exp_<br>(total<br>High<br>|_h_<br>_Exports_<br>_orter j = China_<br>AD cases=126<br>|≡<br>_ijk_<br>**_ln_**<br> <br>)|**_(1+ real exp_**<br>_Exporte_<br>(total<br>High<br>|**_ortshijk) _**<br>_r j = High Inco_<br>AD cases=35<br>|_me_<br>2)|_Export_<br>(tot<br>High<br>|_er j = Other Em_<br>al AD cases=2<br>|_erging_<br>68)|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
||income|Emerging||income|Emerging||income|Emerging||income|Emerging||
|Year|import<br>market_i_|import<br>market_i_<br>(1)|_Test_|import<br>market_i_|import<br>market_i_<br>(2)|_Test_|import<br>market_i_|import<br>market_i_<br>(3)|_Test_|import<br>market_i_|import<br>market_i_<br>(4)|_Test_|
|**_t – 2_**|9.0<sup>a</sup>|7.5<sup>a</sup>|a|9.5<sup>a</sup>|7.0<sup>a</sup>|a|9.6<sup>a</sup>|8.2<sup>a</sup>|a|8.1<sup>a</sup>|6.8<sup>a</sup>|a|
|**_t – 1_**|9.3<sup>a</sup>|7.7<sup>a</sup>|a|9.8<sup>a</sup>|7.4<sup>a</sup>|a|9.7<sup>a</sup>|8.3<sup>a</sup>|a|8.6<sup>a</sup>|7.0<sup>a</sup>|a|
|**_t = year AD measure_** **_imposed_**<br>|8.9<sup>a</sup>|7.1<sup>a</sup>|a|9.5<sup>a</sup>|6.9<sup>a</sup>|a|9.3<sup>a</sup>|7.9<sup>a</sup>|a|8.1<sup>a</sup>|6.2<sup>a</sup>|a|
|**_t + 1_**|8.2<sup>a</sup>|6.5<sup>a</sup>|a|8.9<sup>a</sup>|6.2<sup>a</sup>|a|8.8<sup>a</sup>|7.4<sup>a</sup>|a|7.2<sup>a</sup>|5.3<sup>a</sup>|a|
|**_t + 2_**|8.2<sup>a</sup>|6.4<sup>a</sup>|a|9.0<sup>a</sup>|6.3<sup>a</sup>|a|8.8<sup>a</sup>|7.4<sup>a</sup>|a|7.1<sup>a</sup>|5.1<sup>a</sup>|a|
|**_T – 2_**|8.3<sup>a</sup>|6.5<sup>a</sup>|a|9.0<sup>a</sup>|6.9<sup>a</sup>|a|8.9<sup>a</sup>|7.3<sup>a</sup>|a|7.4<sup>a</sup>|5.0<sup>a</sup>|a|
|**_T – 1_**|8.3<sup>a</sup><br>|6.5<sup>a</sup><br>|a|9.2<sup>a</sup><br>|7.0<sup>a</sup><br>|a|9.0<sup>a</sup><br>|7.3<sup>a</sup><br>|a|7.2<sup>a</sup><br>|5.1<sup>a</sup><br>|a|
|**_T = year AD measureremoved_**|8.6<sup>a</sup>|6.8<sup>a</sup>|a|9.8<sup>a</sup>|7.8<sup>a</sup>|a|9.2<sup>a</sup>|7.5<sup>a</sup>|a|7.5<sup>a</sup>|5.3<sup>a</sup>|a|
|**_T+ 1_**|8.9<sup>a</sup>|7.0<sup>a</sup>|a|10.1<sup>a</sup>|8.0<sup>a</sup>|a|9.3<sup>a</sup>|7.5<sup>a</sup>|a|7.9<sup>a</sup>|5.7<sup>a</sup>|a|
|**_T + 2_**|8.9<sup>a</sup>|7.0<sup>a</sup>|a|10.2<sup>a</sup>|8.2<sup>a</sup>|a|9.2<sup>a</sup>|7.6<sup>a</sup>|a|8.0<sup>a</sup>|5.4<sup>a</sup>|a|
|Total observations<br>||7,460|||1,260|||3,520|||2,680||
|R<sup>2</sup>||0.85|||0.90|||0.89|||0.78||
|AD cases by importer_i_|399|347||65|61||182|170||152|116||
|Share of AD cases with full<br>export resumption*|64.7|62.0||83.1|85.2||58.8|56.5||63.8|57.8||
|Mean years between AD<br>imposed and removed|6.5|5.9||6.8|7.8||6.3|5.6||6.6|5.5||

Notes: Country _j_ ’s exports of product _h_ to policy-imposing country _i_ at year _k._ AD=antidumping. *The definition of an AD case resulting in export resumption is max{ _ExphijT_ +1 , _ExphijT_ +2} ≥ min{ _Exphijt_ 1 , _Exphijt_ 2} _,_ where _Exphijk_ here are defined as _ln(1+ real exportshijk)_ . Superscripts a, b, and c indicate statistical significance at the 1 percent, 5 percent, and 10 percent levels, respectively. “ _Test_ ” is the statistical test for whether the year’s estimated coefficient on the high income import market is statistically different from the coefficient on the emerging import market.

28