**Table D.7:** Community Support

||(1)<br>Control<br>Mean|(2)<br>Pooled|(3)<br>CM|(4)<br>NFA|(5)<br>N|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|**Contributions to clinic index**(SUR)||0.025|0.034|0.016|508|
|||(0.052)|(0.061)|(0.060)||
|||[0.465]|[0.476]|[0.463]||
|(1) Contributions to clinic index (community survey)|0.000|0.109|0.134|0.084|508|
||(1.000)|(0.078)|(0.092)|(0.092)||
|||[0.490]|[0.404]|[1.000]||
|(2) Contributions to clinic index (facility survey)|0.000|_−_0.059|_−_0.067|_−_0.052|508|
||(0.997)|(0.121)|(0.142)|(0.136)||
|||[0.490]|[0.471]|[1.000]||

_Notes:_ Treatment effects are estimated using ANCOVA, controlling for the community-level average of the outcome family index at baseline and matching-triplet fixed effects. Robust standard errors, clustered by clinic, are shown in parentheses. The two indices of contributions to the clinic are composed of variables that measure support and contributions once from the perspective of key informants in the villages and once by health personnel. In the community survey, we ask about meetings between the clinic and community as well as labor contributions to the clinic. In the clinic survey, we ask about labor or financial contributions as well as disputes between the community and the clinic. Significance: * is significant at the 10% level, ** is significant at the 5% level and *** is significant at the 1% level.

**Table D.8:** Community development and political engagement (CDPE)

||(1)<br>Control<br>Mean|(2)<br>Pooled|(3)<br>CM|(4)<br>NFA|(5)<br>N|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|**CDPE index**(SUR)||0.132<br>(0.049)<sup>_∗∗∗_</sup><br>[0.033]<sup>_∗∗_</sup>|0.116<br>(0.060)<sup>_∗_</sup><br>[0.114]|0.150<br>(0.056)<sup>_∗∗∗_</sup><br>[0.025]<sup>_∗∗_</sup>|508|
|(1) Projects with local council/chief|0.054<br>(0.226)|0.047<br>(0.022)<sup>_∗∗_</sup>|0.050<br>(0.026)<sup>_∗_</sup>|0.043<br>(0.026)<sup>_∗_</sup>|507|
|||[0.090]<sup>_∗_</sup>|[0.465]|[0.129]||
|(2) Community provided labor|0.042|0.040|0.038|0.042|504|
||(0.201)|(0.019)<sup>_∗∗_</sup>|(0.022)<sup>_∗_</sup>|(0.023)<sup>_∗_</sup>||
|||[0.090]<sup>_∗_</sup>|[0.465]|[0.129]||
|(3) Community involved in planning|0.030|0.022|0.026|0.018|504|
||(0.171)|(0.016)|(0.020)|(0.020)||
|||[0.103]|[0.465]|[0.161]||
|(4) Problem addressed collectively?|0.583|_−_0.021|_−_0.024|_−_0.018|508|
||(0.494)|(0.040)|(0.045)|(0.046)||
|||[0.277]|[0.533]|[0.247]||
|(5) Proportion has voter card|0.983|0.005|0.003|0.007|489|
||(0.045)|(0.003)|(0.004)|(0.004)<sup>_∗_</sup>||
|||[0.103]|[0.533]|[0.129]||
|(6) Proportion voted in local election|0.973|0.009|0.005|0.012|489|
||(0.054)|(0.004)<sup>_∗∗_</sup>|(0.005)|(0.005)<sup>_∗∗_</sup>||
|||[0.090]<sup>_∗_</sup>|[0.465]|[0.099]<sup>_∗_</sup>||
|(7) Proportion voted in general election|0.973|0.009|0.008|0.011|489|
||(0.055)|(0.005)<sup>_∗∗_</sup>|(0.005)|(0.005)<sup>_∗∗_</sup>||
|||[0.090]<sup>_∗_</sup>|[0.465]|[0.109]||

_Notes:_ Treatment effects are estimated using ANCOVA, controlling for the community-level average of the outcome family index at baseline and matching-triplet fixed effects. Robust standard errors, clustered by clinic, are shown in parentheses. The Baseline variables for projects with the local council/chief refer to projects in the past two years while at endline it was inquired for the past one year. Significance: * is significant at the 10% level, ** is significant at the 5% level and *** is significant at the 1% level.

A20