Table 5: Summary Statistics by Employment Policies and Camp Presence

|||Camp presence|||Median Index||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
||No|Yes|Diference|Below|Above|Diference|
|Good Place for Immigrants (Main Outcome)|0.614|0.608|-0.006|0.602|0.629|0.027|
||(0.180)|(0.228)|(0.903)|(0.210)|(0.183)|(0.559)|
|Refugee population|94,344|101,401|7,056|99,825|92,845|-6,980|
||(109,769.017)|(130,601.280)|(0.797)|(101,545.086)|(146,151.220)|(0.820)|
|Total Population|4,840,615|3,393,306|-1,447,310|3,357,098|5,839,565|2,482,467|
||(7,352,056.533)|(5,010,991.585)|(0.296)|(4,487,745.424)|(8,959,934.481)|(0.177)|
|GDP per capita (USD PPP)|8,891|3,407|-5,485|6,651|6,276|-375|
||(5,573.259)|(4,858.658)|(0.000)|(5,200.356)|(7,173.631)|(0.808)|
|Elementary education (%)|38.4|57.4|19.0|44.8|49.5|4.8|
||(18.658)|(24.189)|(0.000)|(20.553)|(27.078)|(0.423)|
|More than elementary education (%)|61.6|42.6|-19.0|55.2|50.5|-4.8|
||(18.658)|(24.189)|(0.000)|(20.553)|(27.078)|(0.423)|
|Rural (%)|12.3|37.9|25.6|23.6|22.4|-1.2|
||(23.037)|(35.782)|(0.001)|(34.799)|(25.416)|(0.863)|
|Small town (%)|27.9|34.2|6.4|30.1|31.5|1.4|
||(27.690)|(31.610)|(0.359)|(29.950)|(28.860)|(0.836)|
|Suburbs or large city (%)|59.8|27.9|-32.0|46.4|46.1|-0.3|
||(32.926)|(34.962)|(0.000)|(35.998)|(39.795)|(0.978)|
|Minimum distance to border (km)|16|9|-7|13|12|-2|
||(43.180)|(26.389)|(0.345)|(32.135)|(45.091)|(0.843)|
|Travel time to a major city|175|192|17|173|200|27|
||(349.218)|(149.347)|(0.765)|(275.153)|(291.992)|(0.689)|
|Population density|1,103|173|-930|710|684|-26|
||(3,425.058)|(395.252)|(0.074)|(3,089.883)|(1,413.398)|(0.959)|
|Camp presence (%)|0.0|100.0|100.0|45.3|37.9|-7.4|
||(0.000)|(0.000)||(50.253)|(49.380)|(0.524)|
|Employment index|0.3|0.2|-0.1|0.2|0.4|0.2|
||(0.265)|(0.066)|(0.004)|(0.056)|(0.298)|(0.000)|
|Polity index|1.8|1.3|-0.5|0.5|3.5|3.0|
||(4.805)|(4.345)|(0.631)|(4.227)|(4.702)|(0.007)|
|_N_|47|35|82|53|29|82|

Notes: Observations are at the region-event level. The sample consists of the events in the the main specifications for waves of at least 10,000 refugees in a year. Time-varying variables are reported at the year of the event. The first variable is the main dependent variable from GWP in specifications like Table 2, equal to 1 if the respondent answers yes to the question “is the city or area where you live a good place to live for immigrants from other countries?”, 0 for disagreement. “Refugee population” is the region-level refugee population described in Section 4.1. “Total population” is the region-level population figure based on the UN Gridded Population Data of the World, version 4. GDP per capita comes from the GWP. Minimum distance to the border, travel time to a major city, and population density are provided by AidData and spatially merged to the boundaries in GWP. “Camp presence” is the percentage of region-events with camps, with the data described in Section 4. The Employment index corresponds to _de jure_ policies for labor market access from the DWRAP data and supplemented by the authors. It is scaled from 0 to 1, with 1 representing no legal barriers to employment. The polity index is the polity2 scores from the Polity Project, scaled from -10 to 10, with 10 representing democracy and -10 representing autocracy.

the necessary assumption and comparability. Encouragingly, the levels of the main outcome on attitudes from GWP is similar across regions with and without camps, and in regions above and below the median of the employment index within the 27