|Mean<br>in<br>control<br>group<br>(9)|0.033<br>0.086<br>0.621<br>0.047<br>0.343<br>0.129<br>0.969<br>0.487<br>0.662<br>0.676<br>0.486<br>0.713|el, respectively.<br>” tests the null<br>tes in cols. 3-5<br>essions include<br>x, home owner,|
|---|---|---|
|No.<br>Obs<br>(8)|3828<br>4971<br>4986<br>4986<br>4986<br>4986<br>4986<br>4986<br>4986<br>4986<br>4986<br>4986|0 percent lev<br>alue (3)+(5)<br>odel; estima<br>-up. All regr<br>, wealth inde<br>w-up|
|p-value<br>(3)+(5)<br>(7)|0.005<br>0.000<br>0.486<br>0.003<br>0.000<br>0.285<br>0.000<br>0.006<br>0.240<br>0.063<br>0.098|1, 5 and 1<br>tions. ”P-V<br> sectional m<br>le at follow<br>usehold size<br>ered at follo|
|ICATION<br>p-value<br>FWER<br>(6)|[0.550]<br>[0.025]<br>[0.623]<br>[0.726]<br>[0.955]<br>[0.552]<br>[0.024]<br>[0.581]<br>[0.701]<br>[0.701]<br>[0.581]|nifcance at the<br> 10,000 replica<br> from the cross<br>ependent variab<br> the family, ho<br>e language.<br>ps was only of|
|NAL SPECIF<br>_Treated*Yt−_1<br>Coef<br>(Std.Err)<br>(5)|-0.038<br>(0.063)<br>-0.098***<br>(0.032)<br>-0.019<br>(0.036)<br>-0.039<br>(0.037)<br>-0.009<br>(0.062)<br>0.050<br>(0.034)<br>-0.094***<br>(0.032)<br>-0.045<br>(0.036)<br>-0.031<br>(0.041)<br>0.021<br>(0.034)<br>-0.044<br>(0.034)|and * denote sig<br>ng) and based on<br>n cols. 1-2 come<br>e mean of the d<br>does not live with<br>s Yoruba as nativ<br>ough health-cam|
|CONDITIO<br>p-value<br>FWER<br>(4)|[0.004]<br>[0.002]<br>[0.045]<br>[0.014]<br>[0.003]<br>[0.500]<br>[0.000]<br>[0.022]<br>[0.417]<br>[0.417]<br>[0.263]|ters). ***, ** <br>attitudes, testi<br>ne. Estimates i<br>l. 9 reports th<br> home, single, <br> muslim, speak<br>use teasting thr|
|_Treated_<br>Coef<br>(Std.Err)<br>(3)|0.026***<br>(0.009)<br>0.127***<br>(0.033)<br>0.032**<br>(0.015)<br>0.055<br>(0.018)<br>0.045***<br>(0.012)<br>-0.037<br>(0.034)<br>0.082***<br>(0.020)<br>0.080***<br>(0.028)<br>0.045<br>(0.037)<br>0.027<br>(0.028)<br>0.049*<br>(0.029)|e level (80 clus<br>g., knowledge, <br> Y_t−_1 at baseli<br> treatment. Co<br>glish spoken at <br>dary education, <br>t variable beca|
|SECTION<br>_eated_<br>p-value<br>FWER<br>(2)|[0.014]<br>[0.014]<br>[0.002]<br>[0.041]<br>[0.013]<br>[0.001]<br>[0.136]<br>[0.013]<br>[0.012]<br>[0.422]<br>[0.137]<br>[0.422]|e screening centr<br>y of variables (e.<br> sample mean of <br> interaction with<br> of education, En<br>igher than secon<br> of the dependen|
|CROSS-<br>_Coefcient on:_<br>_Tr_<br>Coef<br>(Std.Err)<br>Dep. Var. (Y_t_):<br>(1)|Tested for HIV (observed) (a)<br>0.031**<br>(0.013)<br>Tested last 6 months (self-reported)<br>0.025***<br>(0.009)<br>HIV transmitted during pregnancy<br>0.069***<br>(0.019)<br>Has mentioned ARV drugs spontaneously or<br>when mentioned by enumerator<br>0.037**<br>(0.017)<br>Second test necessary<br>0.047***<br>(0.015)<br>Window period 3 months<br>0.049***<br>(0.012)<br>Can get HIV through intercourse<br>0.01*<br>(0.006)<br>Would buy from an HIV+ shopkeeper<br>0.047***<br>(0.015)<br>An HIV+ boy should play football<br>0.051***<br>(0.016)<br>People HIV+ should not be blamed<br>0.022<br>(0.018)<br>HIV is not punishment for sleeping around<br>0.045**<br>(0.023)<br>Would reveal HIV status to partner<br>0.015<br>(0.013)|Notes. Standard errors in parentheses adjusted for clustering at th<br>FWER adjusted p-values in square brackets, adjusted within famil<br>hypothesis Treated + Treated*Y_t−_1m =0, where Y_t−_1m denote the<br>from the model that includes the lagged dependent variable and its<br>the following controls: female, age, currently attending school, years <br>father obtained higher than secondary education, mother obtained h<br>(a) For this outcome we cannot estimate the model including the lag|

xx