<!-- Start of picture text --> Countr Opwdons<br><!-- End of picture text --> WPS 1204 This paper- a joint product of the Bank's Country Operations Division, **Eastem** Africa Department and the Fiscal Affairs and African Departments of the Intemational Monetary Fund. Copies of **the** paper are **available** free **from** the World Bank, 1818 H Street NW, Washington, DC 20433. Please contact Kathuyn Rivera, room J1O-281, extension 34:41 (October 1993, 28 pages).

Tanzaria embarked on a structurl adjustment program in 1986 after a decade of protracted economic decline. Its program was supported by the Intemational Monetary Fund and the World Bank and was accompanied by a substantial increase in foreign assistance. After seven years of adjustment the environment for higher economic growth has impmved, but the results are only partially encouraging: economic growth has only slightly exceeded population growth, and officially measured domestic savings have deteriorated. Meanwhile, Tanzania's dependency on foreign assistance has increased, reflected in a deterioration of the current account of the balance of payments. This has led to an increasingly heated debate about whether real adjustment is in fact taking place in Tanzania, or whether foreign aid has served to postpone adjustmnent instead of supporting it.

Agrawal, Ahmed, Mered, and Nord shed light on the relationship between adjustment and aid dependency on the basis of Tanzania's experience. Tanzania's weak database is adjusted in several respects to correct for the most glaring deficiencies in it. After adjustment of the database, Tanzania's performance is compared in the period 1981-85, prior to when reforms were launched, with that in the period 1986-90, which followed the lauch of **tde** Economic Rccovery Programn in 1986. To put the Tan7anian experience in context, **its** performance is also compared with that of four Sub-Sahlaran African countries - Ghana, Kenya, Malawi and Uganda - which embarked on similar refomi nrograns during the 1980s.

The adjustment of the macroeconomic data shows that, contrary to traditional interpretation, Tanzania's increased dependency of foreign assistance did not lead to a deterioration in domestic savings performance. And most of the foreign assistance was used for investment rather than for consumption. But the principal difference between Tanzania and the four Sub-Saharan African countries sampled was the efficiency with which the foreign assistance was used. Using a measure of macroeconomic return on investment, the comparison shows that Tanzania is getting very little return on domestic investment even after the introduction of structural reforms. There are several reasons for this, including the dominance of the Tanzanian economy by a large and highWy inefficient parastatal sector. If Tanzania is to generate the accelerated growth that it so urgently needs, one of the key areas of policy reform needs to be the increase in productivity of domestic investment.

The Policy Research Working Paper Series disseminates the findings of work under way in the Bank. An objective of the sries is to get these findings out quickly, even if presentations are less than fully polished. The findings, interpretations. ande conclusions in these papers do not necessarily represent official Bank policy.

Produced by the Policy Research D.ssemination Center