|**Table 3. Characteristics of eligible households**|Dt||Lo|ttery|||No|Lottery||P-value:|Mti|<br>N Mti|<br>Pl|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
||aa||Bfii|<br>Nbf|<br>Pl||Bfii|Nbf|<br>Pl|Lotter vs|eeng|<br>o een|<br>-vaue:|
||Source|Total|enecary<br>(B)|<br>on-ene.<br>(NB)|<br>-vaue:<br>B = NB|Total|enecary<br>(B)|on-ene.<br>(NB)|<br>-vaue:<br>B = NB|y .<br>No Lottery|(M)|(M)|M = NM|
||(1)|(2)|(3)|(4)|(5)|(6)|(7)|(8)|(9)|(10)|(11)|(12)|(13)|
|Head of household is male (0/1)|Baseline|0.655|0.647|0.664|_0.801_|0.588|0.604|0.571|_0.600_|_0.078_|0.622|0.624|_0.962_|
|Age of household head|Baseline|49.6|49.3|49.9|_0.793_|47.7|46.0|49.6|_0.092_|_0.381_|48.2|49.2|_0.630_|
|Head of household is married (0/1)|Baseline|0.825|0.802|0.850|_0.315_|0.814|0.811|0.816|_0.926_|_0.835_|0.804|0.835|_0.560_|
|Head of household can read and write (0/1)|Baseline|0.753|0.733|0.776|_0.580_|0.765|0.840|0.684|_0.029_|_0.820_|0.766|0.752|_0.789_|
|Raven's index (0/3)|Follow-up|1.021|1.056|0.983|_0.359_|1.045|1.150|0.934|_0.098_|_0.748_|1.063|1.002|_0.424_|
|Related to government officials or influentials (0/1)|Baseline|0.179|0.198|0.159|_0.486_|0.132|0.113|0.153|_0.467_|_0.211_|0.153|0.161|_0.845_|
|Socializes with government officials or influentials (0/1)|Baseline|0.157|0.172|0.140|_0.558_|0.123|0.113|0.133|_0.731_|_0.348_|0.129|0.151|_0.554_|
|House has concrete floor (0/1)|Follow-up|0.506|0.506|0.507|_0.989_|0.439|0.449|0.427|_0.438_|_0.266_|0.487|0.461|_0.665_|
|Food security PCA index|Baseline|0.108|0.023|0.200|_0.482_|-0.119|0.256|-0.524|_0.007_|_0.193_|-0.053|0.049|_0.580_|
|Cultivates 1 Ha or less (0/1)|Follow-up|0.613|0.618|0.607|_0.805_|0.598|0.612|0.582|_0.565_|_0.762_|0.598|0.613|_0.759_|
|Maize yield (Kgs/acre) in 2009/10|Baseline|696.4|768.4|618.5|_0.094_|718.5|733.8|700.2|_0.785_|_0.811_|668.4|746.4|_0.416_|
|Used agricultural inputs in 2009/10 (0/1)|Baseline|0.659|0.629|0.692|_0.315_|0.618|0.660|0.571|_0.182_|_0.554_|0.660|0.619|_0.556_|
|Number of Observations|Baseline|223|116|107||204|106|98|||209|218||
||Follow-up|480|251|229||440|227|213|||460|460||
|P-value ofjoint F-test that all coefficients are 0<br>Note: This table shows descriptive statistics using individual level data f<br>beneficiaries of the NAIVS voucher program in 2010/11 in lottery villag<br>compare households in meeting and no meeting villages. Due to imple<br>beneficiary status (Columns 5 and 9) or meeting dummy (Column 13) <br>values for categorical variables are given in parenthesis. (0/1) indicates d|rom the household<br>es. We report anal<br>mentation issues, t<br>against characteris<br>ummy variables, e|survey. Colu<br>ogous figure<br>he number o<br>tics are zero.<br>qual to one i|mn 1 describes<br>s for no lottery<br>f surveyed hous<br> All p-values ar<br>f the response i|when the data<br>villages in Colu<br>eholds at baseli<br>e computed usi<br>s yes. See Appe|_0.903_<br>were collected,<br>mns 6-9. In Co<br>ne is lower th<br>ng the t-asymp<br>ndix Table 1 fo|either at base<br>lumn 10 we<br>an that at fol<br>totic wild clu<br>r definition o|line or follow-u<br>report the p-valu<br>low-up. P-value <br>ster bootstrap p<br>f variables.|p. Column 2 rep<br>es of the mean<br>of joint F-test c<br>rocedure descri|_0.008_<br>orts averages in<br>comparison bet<br>orresponds to t<br>bed in Cameron|_0.565_<br>lottery villages an<br>ween individuals in<br>he p-value of a joi<br> et al. (2008). Clu|d Columns 3-5<br>lottery and no<br>nt F-test that a<br>stering was do|compare benefi<br>lottery villages.<br>ll coefficients of<br>ne at the village|_0.946_<br>ciaries and non-<br>Columns 11-13<br> a regression of<br> level. Range of|