- Braathen, N. A., 2007. Instrument mixes for environmental policy: How many stones should be used to kill a bird? International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics 1 (2), 185235.

- Cian, E., Massimo, T., 2011. Mitigation portfolio and policy instruments when hedging against climate policy and technology uncertainty. Environmental Modeling & Assessment 17 (1-2), 123 136.

- Fischer, C., Newell, R. G., 2008. Environmental and technology policies for climate mitigation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 55 (2), 142162.

- Fischer, C., Preonas, L., 2010. Combining policies for renewable energy: Is the whole less than the sum of its parts? International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics 4, 5192.

- Gerlagh, R., Kverndokk, S., Rosendahl, K. E., Feb. 2009. Optimal timing of climate change policy: Interaction between carbon taxes and innovation externalities. Environmental and Resource Economics 43 (3), 369390.

- Goulder, L. H., Mathai, K., 2000. Optimal CO2 abatement in the presence of induced technological change. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 39 (1), 138.

- Grübler, A., Messner, S., 1998. Technological change and the timing of mitigation measures. Energy Economics 20 (5-6), 495512.

- Grimaud, A., Laorgue, G., Magné, B., Nov. 2011. Climate change mitigation options and directed technical change: A decentralized equilibrium analysis. Resource and Energy Economics 33 (4), 938962.

- Grubb, M., Chapuis, T., Ha-Duong, M., 1995. The economics of changing course : Implications of adaptability and inertia for optimal climate policy. Energy Policy 23 (4-5), 417431.

- Guivarch, C., Hallegatte, S., 2011. Existing infrastructure and the 2<sup>_◦_</sup> C target. Climatic Change 109 (3-4), 801805.

- Ha-Duong, M., Grubb, M. J., Hourcade, J. C., 1997. Inuence of socioeconomic inertia and uncertainty on optimal CO 2-emission abatement. Nature 390, 271.

- IPCC, 2007. Summary for policymakers. In: Climate change 2007: Mitigation. Contribution of working group III to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, USA.

- Jaccard, M., Rivers, N., 2007. Heterogeneous capital stocks and the optimal timing for CO2 abatement. Resource and Energy Economics 29 (1), 116.

- Jae, A. B., Newell, R. G., Stavins, R. N., 2005. A tale of two market failures: Technology and environmental policy. Ecological Economics 54 (2-3), 164174.

- Lecocq, F., Hourcade, J., Ha-Duong, M., 1998. Decision making under uncertainty and inertia constraints: sectoral implications of the when exibility. Energy Economics 20 (5-6), 539555.

- Lipsey, R. G., Lancaster, K., 1956. The general theory of second best. The Review of Economic Studies 24 (1), 1132.

- Manne, A., Richels, R., Jul. 2004. The impact of learning-by-doing on the timing and costs of CO2 abatement. Energy Economics 26 (4), 603619.

- McKinsey, Company, 2007. Reducing US greenhouse gas emissions: How much at what cost? Tech. rep., McKinsey & Co.

- Nakicenovic, N., Alcamo, J., Davis, G., de Vries, B., Fenhann, J., Gan, S., Gregory, K., Grubler, A., Jung, T. Y., Kram, T., et al., 2000. Special report on emissions scenarios: a special report of working group III of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Tech. rep., Pacic Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA (US), Environmental Molecular Sciences Laboratory (US).

- Nordhaus, W. D., 1992. An optimal transition path for controlling greenhouse gases. Science 258 (5086), 13151319.

15