# **Appendix Table 13: Main impacts with False Discovery Rate adjusted q-values.**

||**VT -**<br>**(K**|**Lower bo**<br>**L -/+ .1 S**|**unds**<br>**D)**|**VT**|**- Unadjus**|**ted**|**VT -**<br>**(K**|**Upper bo**<br>**L -/+ .1 S**|**unds**<br>**D)**|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
||β|p-value|q-value|β|p-value|q-value|β|p-value|q-value|
|Total monthlycon|sumption expe|nditure||||||||
|6 months|60.407|0.001|0.001|79.015|0.001|0.002|114.398|0.000|0.001|
|12 months|84.741|0.000|0.001|100.782|0.000|0.001|146.859|0.000|0.001|
|18 months|-0.577|0.969|0.369|34.088|0.203|0.113|97.084|0.000|0.001|
|Monthlyconsump|tionper capita|||||||||
|6 months|-22.004|0.000|0.001|-15.903|0.002|0.003|-9.885|0.011|0.004|
|12 months|-19.553|0.000|0.001|-13.987|0.003|0.003|-6.301|0.057|0.013|
|18 months|-45.651|0.000|0.001|-33.246|0.000|0.001|-23.930|0.000|0.001|
|Food Consumptio|n Score(standa|rdized)||||||||
|6 months|0.162|0.000|0.001|0.207|0.000|0.001|0.261|0.000|0.001|
|12 months|0.135|0.000|0.001|0.195|0.000|0.001|0.254|0.000|0.001|
|18 months|0.063|0.011|0.006|0.143|0.002|0.003|0.239|0.000|0.001|
|Reduced CopingS<br>|trategies Index<br>|(inverted<br>|and standa<br>|rdized)<br>||||||
|6 months|0.158|0.000|0.001|0.205|0.000|0.001|0.247|0.000|0.001|
|12 months|0.016|0.610|0.220|0.076|0.084|0.052|0.133|0.000|0.001|
|18 months|-0.284|0.000|0.001|-0.179|0.000|0.001|-0.096|0.000|0.001|
|Livelihoods Copin<br>|gstrategyInde<br>|x(inverte<br>|d and standa<br>|rdized)<br>||||||
|6 months|0.157|0.000|0.001|0.200|0.000|0.001|0.252|0.000|0.001|
|12 months|-0.100|0.001|0.001|-0.038|0.383|0.181|0.019|0.529|0.069|
|18 months|-0.138|0.000|0.001|-0.036|0.494|0.212|0.046|0.114|0.021|
|Proportion of chil|dren attendings|chool||||||||
|6 months|-0.007|0.610|0.220|0.012|0.485|0.212|0.038|0.007|0.003|
|12 months|0.007|0.611|0.220|0.024|0.187|0.112|0.060|0.000|0.001|
|18 months|-0.016|0.226|0.088|-0.001|0.968|0.353|0.058|0.000|0.001|

_Note: Each coefficient in this table denotes the impact of treatment and is obtained from a different regression of the outcome, which includes a binary treatment indicator fully interacted with the outcome at baseline and the propensity score, the model also includes strata fixed effects (n=5); q-values are False Discovery Rate adjusted p-values and are estimated using the procedure described in Anderson 2008, outcomes over all three follow-ups are considered as one set of outcomes over which adjustments are made; all consumption values are deflated across regions and months to average 2017 Turkish Lira; the proportion of children attending school regression is estimated using the subsample of households with at least one child; FCS, rCSI, and LCSI are standardized to the control group, the rCSI and LCSI are inverted so that for all three WFP scores a higher value indicates an improvement; Unadjusted estimates presents the estimation results from specification 1 using IPW and sampling weights; lower bound estimates are estimated using specification 1 and replacing outcome values for the attrittors with +/- 0.x standard deviations of their respective treatment group-wave means as in Kling and Liebman (2004), lower bounds subtract this value from the treatment group and add it to the control group and vice versa for the upper bounds._ 56