# **4 Appendix G: Social Integration Results**

Table (G1) Impacts of the Program on Primary Outcomes

|**Outcomes**|**Treatment**|**(se)**|**FDR**<br>**q-values**|**Control**<br>**mean**|**(sd)**|**N**|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|Social attitudes & perceptions (SD)|-0.33**|(0.14)|[0.08]|-0.00|(1.00)|1,102|
|Economic attitudes & perceptions (SD)|0.02|(0.16)|[0.56]|0.02|(1.02)|1,102|
|Policy preferences (SD)|0.17|(0.15)|[0.37]|-0.02|(1.00)|1,102|
|Altruism to Syrians|0.21|(0.18)|[0.37]|0.88|(1.18)|1,102|

**_Notes_** :

- The table shows the regression results on pre-specified main outcomes using the 2022 neighbor survey data. Each row is its own dependent variable.

- The outcomes that require definitions are: Social attitudes and perceptions is an index of the following outcomes: of the 3 people the respondent socializes most with, how many are Syrian; of the 3 people the respondent most often shares advice with, how many are Syrian; do children in the household have Syrian friends (binary); do children in the household share recreational space with Syrian children (binary); what is the net effect of Syrian refugees on Jordan’s society (positive-neutral-negative); do Syrian refugees tend to be lazy or hardworking? (1-7); To what degree would people feel comfortable accepting the marriage of their family member to a Syrian refugee? (1-5); To what degree would people feel comfortable accepting a Syrian refugee as a neighbor? (1-5, standardized). These outcomes are standardized with respect to the control group, averaged, then standardized with respect to the control group again.

Economic attitudes and perceptions is an index of the following outcomes: a binary variable equal to one if the respondent listed ‘hosting syrian refugees’ as one of the most important challenges facing Jordan; a 5-point likert scale on whether syrians or jordanians pay more in taxes; the net effect of refugees on the Jordanian economy (positive-neutral-negative). These outcomes are standardized with respect to the control group, averaged, then standardized with respect to the control group again.

Policy preferences is an index of outcomes which report the degree to which respondents agree with the following statements, each of which were asked using a 5-point likert scale: refugees should be relocated to refugee camps; refugees should have the right to work outside refugee camps; refugees should be allowed to become full citizens if they have lived in Jordan for a long time and would like to become a Jordanian; Syrian refugees should be given unrestricted work permits; Syrian refugee children should be allowed to be in classes with Jordanian children; Syrian refugees should be allowed to enter and leave camps freely; Syrian refugees should be given housing assistance through shelter programs that subsidize their rent; the international community should spend more money to support refugees. All outcomes are standardized with respect to the control group, averaged, then standardized with respect to the control group again.

Altruism to Syrians ranges from 0-5 JD and reports how much of a 5JD transfer was allocated to a charity serving Syrian refugees vs a charity serving vulnerable Jordanians vs kept for self. The altruism exercise was incentivized for one third of the sample, who were actually given 5 JD to allocate between the 3 choices. The rest of the sample was asked to make a hypothetical choice.

- The regressions also have enumerator fixed effects, community-level controls (Irbid/Mafraq governorate and population quartile), refugee household-level controls (shelter program, baseline number of children, baseline number of children plus adults), the Marlowe–Crowne scale, and respondent gender, education, and age. In the parentheses are robust standard errors clustered at the locality level. Statistical significance represented by * (10%), ** (5%), and *** (1%). Q-values are calculated per Anderson (2008) and correspond to Family 1 in the pre-analysis plan.

39