15 Table 3: Average annual per capita expenditure and urbanization in sample countries without data on quantities of fuel consumed

|**Country**|**Survey**<br>**year**|**Survey**<br>**sample**<br>**size**|**Per capita**<br>**expenditure from**<br>**national accounts**<br>**(2005 $ at PPP)**|**Per capita**<br>**expenditure from**<br>**survey**<br>**(2005 $ at PPP)**|**% of HHs**<br>**in urban**<br>**areas**|**% of HHs**<br>**with positive**<br>**expenditures**<br>**on electricity**<sup>**a**</sup>|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|**Albania**|2008|3,420|5,799|3,693|53|89<sup>b</sup>|
|**Brazil**|2008–09|43,435|5,309|4,566|85|91|
|**Mexico**|2008|25,068|8,446|3,163|80|71|
|**Peru**|2009|20,414|4,335|3,149|66|83<sup>c</sup>|

_Sources:_ National accounts data and exchange rates from WDI, the rest from national household expenditure surveys and authors’ calculations.

_Notes:_ PPP = purchasing power parity; HH = households. All dollar amounts are U.S. dollars. a. The calculations exclude respondents who were missing data on household size, household weight, or both. b. Although 89 percent of respondents reported positive expenditures, the rate of electrification in Albania is higher. c. The percentage represents those who replied that they used electricity.

For each of the 10 countries, Table 4 summarizes the percentage of users, quantities purchased per month by user households, and average expenditure shares on LPG by user households. The share of households using LPG was higher in urban areas everywhere except in Pakistan, where many urban households were connected to natural gas. Only in Albania and Brazil had LPG achieved high penetration rates in both rural and urban areas. The amount of LPG purchased or consumed per month by user households tended to be slightly higher for urban households, and generally fell between 9 and 12 kg in urban areas and between 7 and 11 kg in rural areas.

Table 4: Summary statistics on LPG use

|**Country**|**Share of h**<br>**L**<br>**Rural**|**ouseholds using**<br>**PG (%)**<br>**Urban**|**Quantity pe**<br>**(kg**<br>**Rural**|**r us**<br>**/mo**<br>|**er household**<br>**nth)**<br>**Urban**|**Expenditu**<br>**house**<br>**Rural**|**re share of user**<br>**holds (%)**<br>**Urban**|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|**Guatemala**|24|74|11||12|2.7|2.5|
|**India**|12|59|9.1||12|4.8|4.3|
|**Indonesia**|2.2|13|11||12|3.4|2.3|
|**Kenya**|1.2|13|10||9.6|4.5|2.7|
|**Pakistan**|8.4|7.0|6.8||11|3.1|4.6|
|**Sri Lanka**|21|60|6.7||9.3|1.8|2.3|
|**Albania**<sup>**a**</sup>|71|72|11||12|2.8|3.3|
|**Brazil**<sup>**a**</sup>|81|89|8.0||8.4|3.5|2.5|
|**Mexico**<sup>**a,b**</sup>|54|87|25||30|5.6|4.4|
|**Peru**<sup>**a**</sup>|21|85|7.9||9.6|2.7|2.0|

_Source:_ Authors’ calculations. a. Quantities are estimated using national average prices. b. The shares of households using LPG are based on the statistics for those using LPG as the primary cooking fuel.

In Mexico, where LPG was also widely used for heating, consumption was much higher than in other countries. The shares of total expenditure allocated to LPG by user households fell mostly in the range of 2.5 to 5 percent. In most cases the share for rural user households was higher than for urban. Pakistan, Sri Lanka, and Albania were exceptions to this pattern, explained