Table (F10) Impacts of the Program on Relationships and MacArthur Ladder

|**Outcomes**|**Treatment**|**(se)**|**FDR**<br>**q-values**|**Control**<br>**mean**|**(sd)**|**N**|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|No. of close Jordanian friends|-0.47|(0.51)|[0.56]|2.98|(3.66)|1,321|
|Met close Jordanian friend at child’s school|-0.01|(0.01)|[0.56]|0.00|(0.07)|1,249|
|Met close Jordanian friend as neighbor|-0.13*|(0.07)|[0.56]|0.52|(0.50)|1,321|
|Overwhelmed by fnancial needs of others (index)|0.26|(0.17)|[0.56]|-0.02|(1.01)|936|
|Current Macarthur rung (index)|-0.01|(0.12)|[0.84]|-0.01|(0.98)|1,321|
|Aspired Macarthur rung (index)|0.03|(0.13)|[0.84]|0.00|(1.00)|1,321|

**_Notes_** :

- The table shows the regression results on pre-specified main outcomes using the 2022-2023 phone survey data. Each row is its own dependent variable.

- N. of close Jordanian friends reports the treatment effect on the number of close Jordanian friends the respondent reports. Met close Jordanian friend at ... reports an indicator for where the respondent met the most recent close Jordanian friend they made. Overwhelmed by financial needs of others is a standardized likert response to “Over the past week, I have felt overwhelmed or burdened by the financial needs of people outside my household”. Current Macarthur rung is a standardized version of the following question: “Imagine a ladder with 10 rungs representing society. At the top of the ladder are the people who are the best off, those who have the most money, most education, and best jobs. At the bottom are the people who are the worst off, those who have the least money, least education, worst jobs, or no job. If the top of the ladder is the 10th rung and the bottom is the 1st. Which rung best represents where you think you stand?” Aspired macarthur rung is a standardized version of the 1-10 response on which rung they would like to acheive in their life.

- The regressions also have assessment month-by-year fixed effects, enumerator fixed effects, community-level controls (Irbid/Mafraq governorate and population quartile), and household-level controls (vulnerability-assessment quartile, shelter program, baseline number of children, baseline number of children plus adults, respondent gender, and respondent age). In the parentheses are robust standard errors clustered at the locality level. Regressions are weighted by the number of people interviewed in each household. Statistical significance represented by * (10%), ** (5%), and *** (1%). Q-values are calculated per Anderson (2008) and correspond to Family xxx in the preanalysis plan.

Table (F11) Impacts of the Program on Preferences towards it

|**Outcomes**|**Treatment**|**(se)**|**FDR**<br>**q-values**|**Control**<br>**mean**|**(sd)**|**N**|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|Prefers transfer to landlord vs. cash|0.03|(0.07)|[1.00]|0.53|(0.50)|1,321|
|Prefers transfer to landlord vs. food vouchers|0.07|(0.07)|[1.00]|0.27|(0.44)|1,321|
|Expected Beneft from Program Index|-0.05|(0.12)|[1.00]|-0.01|(1.00)|1,297|

**_Notes_** :

- The table shows the regression results on pre-specified main outcomes using the 2022-2023 phone survey data. Each row is its own dependent variable.

- Prefers transfer to landlord vs cash is the treatment effect on an indicator for preferring a program that pays 75 JD to the landlord towards rent each month for 1 year over a program that gives cash worth [75, 65 or 55] JD, each month. (75, 65 and 55 were randomized with equal probability)

- Prefers transfer to landlord vs cash is the treatment effect on an indicator for preferring a program that pays 75 JD to the landlord towards rent each month for 1 year over a program that gives food voucher worth [75, 65 or 55] JD, each month (averaged). (75, 65 and 55 were randomized with equal probability)

- Expected benefit program index is a standardized index of the following outcomes: 1) would spend more on food consumption if they were receiving the program 2) would spend more on healthcare if they were receiving the program and 3) would be happier if they were receiving the program.

- The regressions also have assessment month-by-year fixed effects, enumerator fixed effects, community-level controls (Irbid/Mafraq governorate and population quartile), and household-level controls (vulnerability-assessment quartile, shelter program, baseline number of children, baseline number of children plus adults, respondent gender, and respondent age). In the parentheses are robust standard errors clustered at the locality level. Regressions are weighted by the number of people interviewed in each household. Statistical significance represented by * (10%), ** (5%), and *** (1%). Q-values are calculated per Anderson (2008) and correspond to Family xxx in the preanalysis plan.

38