# Table (E12) Impacts of the Program on Individual Child Outcomes

|**Outcomes**|**Treatment**|**(se)**|**FDR**<br>**q-values**|**Control**<br>**mean**|**(sd)**|**N**|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|Strengths and Diffculties Questionnaire (Z-Score)|-0.16|(0.18)|[1.00]|0.00|(1.00)|905|
|Child Happiness (Scale 1-7)|-0.16|(0.31)|[1.00]|5.73|(1.54)|951|
|Child Alertness (Scale 1-7)|0.04|(0.25)|[1.00]|5.72|(1.64)|951|
|Child Sleep Duration (Hours)|-0.13|(0.24)|[1.00]|9.79|(1.49)|939|
|Child Bed Time (Military)|2.02|(1.70)|[1.00]|17.26|(8.65)|948|
|Child Wake Up Time (Military)|-0.06|(0.33)|[1.00]|8.20|(1.61)|943|

**_Notes_** :

- The table shows the regression results on pre-specified child outcomes using the 2021 in-person data. Each row is its own dependent variable.

- The outcomes that require definitions are: Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) is a screening questionnaire administered to a randomly selected child aged three to eight years old and covers emotional, conduct, hyperactivity, peer, and prosocial problems. SDQ is standardized by subtracting the control group’s mean and dividing by its standard deviation.

- The independent variable of interest is the TOT treatment indicator, which is the predicted value from a first-stage regression of treatment implementation on treatment assignment.

- The regressions also have assessment month-by-year fixed effects, enumerator fixed effects, community-level controls (Irbid/Mafraq governorate and population quartile), and household-level controls (vulnerability-assessment quartile, shelter program, baseline number of children, baseline number of children plus adults, respondent gender, and respondent age). In the parentheses are robust standard errors clustered at the locality level. Regressions are weighted by the number of people interviewed in each household. Statistical significance represented by * (10%), ** (5%), and *** (1%). Q-values are calculated per Anderson (2008) and correspond to Family 8 in the preanalysis plan.

# Table (E13) Impacts of the Program on Household-Level Child Outcomes

|**Outcomes**|**Treatment**|**(se)**|**FDR**<br>**q-values**|**Control**<br>**mean**|**(sd)**|**N**|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|Count of Non-Adult Dependents in Household|-0.07|(0.18)|[1.00]|3.30|(2.02)|1,422|
|Student Child School Attendance in Household (=1)|0.18|(0.12)|[1.00]|0.51|(0.50)|760|
|Student Child School Attendance in Household (0-5)|-0.13|(0.30)|[1.00]|3.80|(1.29)|760|
|Child Hunger in Household (Days Last Week)|0.12|(0.18)|[1.00]|0.47|(1.15)|1,269|
|Any Child Vaccinated (=1)|0.09|(0.12)|[1.00]|0.84|(0.37)|509|

**_Notes_** :

- The table shows the regression results on pre-specified household-level child outcomes using the 2021 in-person data. Each row is its own dependent variable.

- The outcomes that require definitions are: Child Hunger is defined as the number of days in the last 7 days on which any children in the household had to go to sleep hungry because there was not enough food.

- The independent variable of interest is the TOT treatment indicator, which is the predicted value from a first-stage regression of treatment implementation on treatment assignment.

- The regressions also have assessment month-by-year fixed effects, enumerator fixed effects, community-level controls (Irbid/Mafraq governorate and population quartile), and household-level controls (vulnerability-assessment quartile, shelter program, baseline number of children, baseline number of children plus adults, respondent gender, and respondent age). In the parentheses are robust standard errors clustered at the locality level. Regressions are weighted by the number of people interviewed in each household. Statistical significance represented by * (10%), ** (5%), and *** (1%). Q-values are calculated per Anderson (2008) and correspond to Family 8 in the preanalysis plan.

24