Table (D11) Impacts of the Program on Individual Components of Indices

|**Outcomes**|**Treatment**|**(se)**|**FDR**<br>**q-values**|**Control**<br>**mean**|**(sd)**|**N**|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|_Overall Housing Quality (Z-Score):_|0.48*|(0.26)|[0.24]|-0.00|(1.00)|1,610|
|Quality Floor (=1)|0.20*|(0.12)|[0.24]|0.68|(0.47)|1,610|
|Quality Roof (=1)|0.24***|(0.09)|[0.08]|0.71|(0.45)|1,610|
|Grid Electricity (=1)|0.15*|(0.09)|[0.24]|0.78|(0.41)|1,610|
|Piped Drinking Water (=1)|0.01|(0.09)|[0.94]|0.24|(0.43)|1,610|
|# People per Room|-0.32*|(0.19)|[0.24]|2.37|(1.42)|1,610|
|_Disability level 3 (=1 if disabled):_|-0.00|(0.06)|[0.99]|0.26|(0.44)|1,610|
|Vision (Higher is more disability)|0.06|(0.08)|[0.52]|1.32|(0.59)|1,610|
|Hearing (Higher is more disability)|-0.04|(0.06)|[0.52]|1.12|(0.37)|1,610|
|Mobility (Higher is more disability)|0.04|(0.10)|[0.71]|1.60|(0.78)|1,610|
|Cognition (Higher is more disability)|0.20*|(0.11)|[0.24]|1.39|(0.64)|1,610|
|Diffculty with self-care (z-score)|0.38***|(0.14)|[0.08]|-0.00|(1.00)|1,610|
|Communication (Higher is more disability)|0.02|(0.04)|[0.71]|1.05|(0.25)|1,609|
|_CESD score (Higher better):_|0.13|(0.17)|[0.52]|0.00|(1.00)|1,607|
|felt hopeful about the future|0.27|(0.18)|[0.31]|1.47|(1.30)|1,601|
|was happy|-0.06|(0.13)|[0.71]|1.10|(1.02)|1,606|
|bothered by things that don’t bother me (reversed)|0.21|(0.15)|[0.31]|2.14|(0.97)|1,603|
|had a problem in concentration (reversed)|0.25*|(0.14)|[0.24]|2.33|(0.92)|1,605|
|<br>felt depressed and troubled in my mind (reversed)|-0.01|(0.20)|[0.99]|1.76|(1.13)|1,606|
|felt everything that I did took up my energy (reversed)|0.05|(0.17)|[0.80]|1.89|(1.11)|1,603|
|felt afraid (reversed)|0.15|(0.17)|[0.52]|2.18|(1.09)|1,605|
|<br>had diffculty in sleeping peacefully (reversed)|0.14|(0.19)|[0.52]|2.01|(1.08)|1,605|
|felt lonely (reversed)|-0.30*|(0.18)|[0.24]|1.92|(1.18)|1,606|
|lacked the motivation to do anything (reversed)|0.04|(0.12)|[0.72]|2.17|(1.04)|1,602|
|_COVID-19 symptopms Index:_|0.69***|(0.14)|[0.00]|0.00|(1.00)|1,610|
|<br>COVID-19-positive (=1)|0.15**|(0.08)|[0.24]|0.02|(0.13)|105|
|Total COVID-19 symptoms|0.84***|(0.19)|[0.00]|0.47|(1.22)|1,610|
|_COVID-19 Riskiness Index:_|0.19|(0.13)|[0.31]|-0.00|(1.00)|1,609|
|Left home (=1)|0.06|(0.07)|[0.52]|0.62|(0.48)|1,609|
|Attended social gatherings (=1)|0.05|(0.07)|[0.52]|0.36|(0.48)|1,609|
|Did not keep distance (=1)|0.16***|(0.06)|[0.08]|0.51|(0.50)|1,609|
|<br>Attended mosque (=1)|0.09**|(0.04)|[0.19]|0.25|(0.43)|1,609|
|Went to market (=1)|0.01|(0.06)|[0.93]|0.46|(0.50)|1,609|
|Left village (=1)|0.03|(0.06)|[0.71]|0.22|(0.41)|1,609|

**_Notes_** :

- The table shows the regression results on index items using the phone survey midline data. Each row is its own dependent variable.

- The independent variable of interest is the TOT treatment indicator, which is the predicted value from a first-stage regression of treatment implementation on treatment assignment.

- The regressions also have assessment month-by-year fixed effects, enumerator fixed effects, community-level controls (Irbid/Mafraq governorate and population quartile), and household-level controls (vulnerability-assessment quartile, shelter program, baseline number of children, baseline number of children plus adults, respondent gender, and respondent age).

- In the parentheses are robust standard errors clustered at the locality level. Regressions are weighted by the number of people interviewed in each household. Statistical significance represented by * (10%), ** (5%), and *** (1%). Q-values are calculated per Anderson (2008) and correspond to all indices components.

13