# Table (F6) Impacts of the Program on Migration

|**Outcomes**|**Treatment**|**(se)**|**FDR**<br>**q-values**|**Control**<br>**mean**|**(sd)**|**N**|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|Probability of confict resolving in two years (index)|-0.00|(0.16)|[1.00]|0.02|(1.01)|1,130|
|Probability of returning to Syria w/ confict unresolved (index)|0.10|(0.16)|[1.00]|-0.02|(0.96)|1,300|
|Probability of returning to Syria w/ confict resolved (index)|0.08|(0.18)|[1.00]|0.01|(1.00)|1,294|
|Confict more likely to increase in next three months {0,1}|0.07|(0.09)|[1.00]|0.54|(0.50)|1,073|

**_Notes_** :

- The table shows the regression results on pre-specified main outcomes using the 2022-2023 phone survey data. Each row is its own dependent variable.

- Probability of conflict resolving in 2 years is a standardized likert scale (1-4) from very unlikely to very likely. Probability of returning to Syria with conflict unresolved/resolved are standardized likert scales (1-4) from very unlikely to very likely. Conflict more likely to increase in the next 3 months is an indicator.

- The regressions also have assessment month-by-year fixed effects, enumerator fixed effects, community-level controls (Irbid/Mafraq governorate and population quartile), and household-level controls (vulnerability-assessment quartile, shelter program, baseline number of children, baseline number of children plus adults, respondent gender, and respondent age). In the parentheses are robust standard errors clustered at the locality level. Regressions are weighted by the number of people interviewed in each household. Statistical significance represented by * (10%), ** (5%), and *** (1%). Q-values are calculated per Anderson (2008) and correspond to Family xxx in the preanalysis plan.

Table (F7) Impacts of the Program on Physical and Mental Health

|**Outcomes**|**Treatment**|**(se)**|**FDR**<br>**q-values**|**Control**<br>**mean**|**(sd)**|**N**|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|Recent symptoms (index)|0.11|(0.17)|[0.43]|-0.01|(1.01)|1,321|
|Current health conditions (index)|0.21|(0.16)|[0.25]|0.01|(1.01)|1,321|
|Diagnosis of (2) after Oct 2019 (index)|0.12|(0.19)|[0.43]|0.02|(1.03)|1,321|
|Subjective health (index)|-0.17|(0.15)|[0.25]|-0.00|(1.00)|1,321|
|Subjective happiness (index)|-0.36**|(0.16)|[0.19]|0.01|(1.00)|1,319|
|Depression (CESD, std)|0.26*|(0.15)|[0.21]|-0.01|(1.00)|1,285|
|Depressed {0,1}|0.11*|(0.07)|[0.21]|0.75|(0.43)|1,321|

**_Notes_** :

- The table shows the regression results on pre-specified main outcomes using the 2022-2023 phone survey data. Each row is its own dependent variable.

- Recent symptoms index includes the following: rapid weight loss, fast and irregular heart beat, difficulty breathing, stomach pain, headaches. Current health conditions is an index including diabetes, hypertension and cancer. Diagnosis of (2) after 2019 is an index of indicators equalling one if FR was diagnosed with one of the above conditions after Oct 2019, zero if before or if does not have diagnosis. Subjective health is a standardized likert scale (1-4) of self-reported health from good to very poor. Subjective happiness is a standardized likert scale (1-3) of self reported happiness. Depression reports the standardized CESD score where higher values report higher risk of depression. Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) is a measure for depressive symptoms and includes 10 items asking about the past week. It is defined as a mean-effect index of 10 items scored 0-3 in the past week (I was bothered by things that usually don’t bother me, I had a problem in concentration on what I was doing, I felt depressed and troubled in my mind, I felt that everything that I did took up all my energy, I felt hopeful about the future (reversed), I felt afraid, I had difficulty in sleeping peacefully, I was happy (reversed), I felt lonely, I lacked the motivation to do anything). It is then normalized by subtracting the control group’s mean and dividing by its standard deviation. Depressed is an indicator for being above the CESD threshold of 10 out of 30.

- The regressions also have assessment month-by-year fixed effects, enumerator fixed effects, community-level controls (Irbid/Mafraq governorate and population quartile), and household-level controls (vulnerability-assessment quartile, shelter program, baseline number of children, baseline number of children plus adults, respondent gender, and respondent age). In the parentheses are robust standard errors clustered at the locality level. Regressions are weighted by the number of people interviewed in each household. Statistical significance represented by * (10%), ** (5%), and *** (1%). Q-values are calculated per Anderson (2008) and correspond to Family xxx in the preanalysis plan.

35