**Table (A.2)** Statistically Significant Impacts of the Program at Midline (with Lee Bounds)

|**Outcome**|**TOT**|**(se)**|**FDR**<br>**q-values**|**Lower**<br>**Bound**|**Upper**<br>**Bound**|**Control**<br>**mean**|**(sd)**|**N**|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|**Panel A: Housing Improvements**|||||||||
|Quality Roof (=1)|0.24***|(0.09)|[0.08]|0.23**|0.33***|0.71|(0.45)|1,610|
|Clean water (=1)|0.21***|(0.06)|[0.01]|0.07|0.25***|0.17|(0.38)|1,610|
|Occupied Rooms|0.51***|(0.17)|[0.04]|0.14|0.79***|2.85|(1.05)|1,610|
|**Panel B: Food Aid and Insecurity**|||||||||
|Food consumption (aid) USD PPP|-53.05**|(22.40)|[0.02]|-72.09***|-46.97**|218.51|(201.68)|1,569|
|Food consumption (aid) USD PPP (_Per capita_)|-9.73***|(3.44)|[0.01]|-13.03***|-8.73***|35.88|(29.19)|1,569|
|Respondent hunger last week (=1)|0.23***|(0.07)|[0.01]|0.12*|0.29***|0.35|(0.48)|1,604|
|Adults hunger last week (=1)|0.17***|(0.06)|[0.01]|0.07|0.24***|0.38|(0.49)|1,610|
|<br>Child hunger last week (=1)|0.24***|(0.07)|[0.00]|0.03|0.30***|0.23|(0.42)|1,469|
|**Panel C: Household Recomposition**|||||||||
|Number of children under 18 years|0.30**|(0.15)|[0.03]|-0.14|0.56***|3.27|(1.97)|1,610|
|Number of boys aged 13-17 years in household|0.16**|(0.07)|[0.33]|-0.20***|0.24***|0.40|(0.66)|1,610|
|**Panel D: COVID-19 Outcomes**|||||||||
|Weekly adult income (during frst lockdown)|-20.07***|(7.19)|[0.02]|-52.48***|-17.86***|30.22|(66.86)|1,609|
|Total COVID-19 symptoms|0.84***|(0.19)|[0.00]|-0.03|0.94***|0.47|(1.22)|1,610|
|Number of people who are symptomatic|0.46***|(0.09)|[0.00]|0.03|0.52***|0.29|(0.61)|1,581|
|Number of children who are symptomatic|0.17***|(0.05)|[0.01]|-0.14***|0.19***|0.06|(0.32)|1,472|
|Number of visits to healthcare institutions|-0.56***|(0.23)|[0.04]|-1.66***|-0.40*|1.14|(2.03)|1,608|
|Did not keep distance (=1)|0.16***|(0.06)|[0.08]|0.09|0.26***|0.51|(0.50)|1,609|
|**Panel E: Loans**|||||||||
|Loans taken pre-frst-lockdown (=1)|-0.20***|(0.07)|[0.01]|-0.27***|-0.12*|0.61|(0.49)|1,608|
|Loans taken during frst lockdown (=1)|-0.34***|(0.07)|[0.00]|-0.38***|-0.24***|0.78|(0.41)|1,608|
|Loans taken after frst lockdown (=1)|-0.33***|(0.07)|[0.00]|-0.45***|-0.28***|0.42|(0.49)|1,607|
|**Panel F: Other effects**|||||||||
|Total number of school days attended per child|-0.43*|(0.24)|[0.04]|-0.79***|-0.22|2.33|(2.49)|1,031|
|Child alertness (s.d. units)|-0.73***|(0.20)|[0.00]|-0.50***|-1.45***|0.00|(1.00)|975|
|Diffculty with self-care (z-score)|0.38***|(0.14)|[0.08]|-0.43***|0.43***|-0.00|(1.00)|1,610|
|Number of learning activities|0.19**|(0.09)|[0.08]|-0.21***|0.27***|0.22|(0.56)|1,385|

_Notes:_ The table shows the regression results on statistically significant results from the midline survey. Each row is its own dependent variable. Panel A outcomes are Clean Water, defined as an indicator for households having treated drinking water (such as by a filter). Rooms and rooms occupied by family members are reported by the respondents. Panel B outcomes are food consumption, Respondent (and adult) food insecurity equals 1 if the respondent went to bed hungry on at least one day in the last week and 0 otherwise. Panel C outcomes are self-explanatory. Panel D outcomes are COVID symptoms, which is the sum of indicators that increase the likelihood of COVID contraction by the respondent including leaving the house, attending social gatherings, not keeping distance from others, going to mosque or other religious institutions, going to grocery store or market, and leaving village/neighborhood. The other outcomes are as explained in the labels. Panel E The periods of the loans referred to are before lockdown: (January 15 - March 15, 2020); during lockdown: (March 15 - May 15, 2020); and after lockdown: (May 15 - interview date). Panel F outcomes are Total number of school days attended per child is the total number of school days (from none to 5 days) attended by all schoolaged children in ages 9-17, divided by the total number of children who are school-aged; Difficulty with self-scare with higher values indicating more disability. This is an item of the The Washington Group Short Set on Functioning; learning activities are done in the last 24 hours and include homework, e-learning, educational programs and videos, and reading; Respondent networks corresponds to people (excl. household members) that the respondent knew who were already in their current neighborhood when they moved to their current residence and is coded as 1 if “0”, 2 if “1-5”, 3 if “6-10”, 4 if “11-20”, and 5 if “More than 20”. The other outcomes are as explained in the labels. Monetary values are in USD PPP and are winsorized at the top 1% of values in order to limit the influence of outliers. Health visits is also winsorized at the top 1% due to outliers in that measure. The regressions also have month-by-year fixed effects, community-level controls (Irbid/Mafraq governorate and population quartile), and household-level controls (vulnerability-assessment quartile, shelter program, baseline number of children, baseline number of children plus adults, respondent gender, and respondent age). In the parentheses are robust standard errors clustered at the locality level. Regressions are weighted by the number of people interviewed in each household. Statistical significance represented by * (10%), ** (5%), and *** (1%). Q-values are calculated per Anderson (2008) and correspond to various families in the pre-analysis plan. The lower and upper bounds refer to the ones proposed in Lee (2009) to correct for attrition. The lower bounds marked by NA for number of children is not possible to report because trimming the lower tail would result in no variation in the variable, making the regression impossible to run as it becomes a column of zeros.

A-3