Table (G5) Impacts of the Program on Social Attitudes and Policy Preferences

|**Outcomes**|**Treatment**|**(se)**|**FDR**<br>**q-values**|**Control**<br>**mean**|**(sd)**|**N**|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|Attitude on refugee relocation|0.01|(0.16)|[1.00]|0.01|(0.99)|1,102|
|Attitude on refugee work|0.11|(0.15)|[0.91]|-0.01|(0.99)|1,102|
|Attitude on refugee citizenship|0.05|(0.14)|[1.00]|0.01|(1.01)|1,102|
|Refugee effect on economy|-0.23|(0.14)|[0.38]|-0.01|(1.00)|1,102|
|Refugee effect on society|0.02|(0.16)|[1.00]|-0.04|(0.97)|1,102|
|Positive effects of refugees|-0.13|(0.15)|[0.76]|-0.02|(0.98)|1,102|
|Negative effects of refugees|-0.23|(0.14)|[0.38]|0.03|(1.01)|1,074|
|Taxes best to reduce poverty|-0.01|(0.04)|[1.00]|0.06|(0.23)|1,042|
|Attitude on Syrian refugee work ethic|0.13|(0.30)|[1.00]|5.82|(1.75)|1,086|
|Support for work permits|-0.03|(0.16)|[1.00]|-0.01|(1.00)|1,102|
|Support for integrated schooling|0.19|(0.15)|[0.46]|-0.02|(1.01)|1,102|
|Support for freedom of movement|-0.02|(0.17)|[1.00]|-0.03|(1.00)|1,102|
|Support for housing assistance|0.24|(0.15)|[0.38]|-0.04|(1.01)|1,102|
|Support for intl refugee assistance|0.28*|(0.15)|[0.38]|-0.03|(1.02)|1,102|
|Support for integration index|0.08|(0.16)|[1.00]|-0.01|(0.98)|1,102|
|Primary identity - religion|-0.11|(0.07)|[0.38]|0.84|(0.36)|1,097|
|Primary identity - not national|-0.07|(0.06)|[0.50]|0.87|(0.33)|1,097|
|Days of media consumption|-1.08***|(0.40)|[0.08]|4.78|(2.78)|1,102|
|Refugees a top challenge|0.04|(0.04)|[0.76]|0.05|(0.22)|1,102|
|Perception of Jordanian economy|0.38**|(0.17)|[0.25]|-0.01|(0.95)|1,092|
|Share of Syrians receiving aid|-0.31|(3.87)|[1.00]|62.12|(32.13)|1,075|
|Avg aid amount (PPP)|-347.17***|(109.69)|[0.04]|630.84|(657.41)|685|

**_Notes_** :

- The table shows the regression results on pre-specified main outcomes using the 2022 neighbor survey data. Each row is its own dependent variable.

- Each of the following outcomes are standardized so that an increase corresponds with a more “pro-refugee” attitude. Refugee relocation is the response to “All refugees in Jordan should be relocated to live in the camps.” Refugee work corresponds to “ Refugees who live in Jordan right now should be allowed to continue to work outside the camps.” Refugee citizenship corresponds to “Refugees should be allowed to become full citizens if they have lived in Jordan for a long time and would like to become a Jordanian. As citizens, they would have the right to vote in Jordan elections.” Effect on economy corresponds to “ In your opinion, is the net effect of Syrian refugees on Jordan’s economy positive, neutral, or negative?” Effect on society corresponds to “ In your opinion, is the net effect of Syrian refugees on Jordan’s society positive, neutral, or negative? Positive effects corresponds to the number of positive effects on society listed by the respondent (options not read aloud). Negative effects corresponds to the number of negative effects on society listed by the respondent (options not read aloud). Taxes best to reduce poverty indicates support for “Statement 1: The best way to reduce poverty is to increase your taxes so the government can help the poor through social spending.” vs “Statement 2: The best way to reduce poverty is to encourage people like yourself to pay more sadaqa for charitable distribution.” Attitude on Syrian refugee work ethic corresponds to “Do Syrian refugees tend to be hardworking or lazy? On a scale of 1-7, with 1 being lazy and 7 being hardworking?” Work permits corresponds to “Do you think Syrian refugees should be given unrestricted work permits?” Integrated schooling corresponds to “Do you think Syrian refugee children should be allowed to be in classes with Jordanian children?” Freedom of movement corresponds to “ Do you think Syrian refugees should be allowed to enter and leave camps freely?” Housing assistance corresponds to “Do you think Syrian refugees should be given housing assistance through shelter programs that subsidize their rent?” Intl refugee assistance corresponds to “ Do you think the international community should spend more money to support refugees?” Support for integration index is an index composed of the the following attitude questions: relocation, work, citizenship, work permits, integrated schooling, freedom of movement, and housing assistance. Primary identity corresponds to the following question: “Which of the following best describes you?” (Read the options aloud.); Above all I am a Jordanian; Above all I am a Muslim; Above all I am an Arab; Above all I am a Christian. Days of media consumption corresponds to “In the past 7 days, how many days did you read or listen to the news from any source, including newspapers, online, WhatsApp, etc.?” Refugees a top challenge is an indicator equalling 1 if the respondent volunteered that refugees were one of the most important challenges facing Jordan (options not read aloud). Perception of jordanian economy corresponds to “How would you evaluate the current economic situation in your country?’ Share of Syrians receiving aid and average aid amount correspond to the following questions: “What percent of refugee households in your neighborhood do you think receive any assistance from any organizations in a typical month, in cash or in kind? Enumerator: Do not include assistance received from other households.” and “Of the refugee households in your neighborhood who receive assistance, what do you think is the average value in Dinar of the assistance (in cash or in kind) that they receive from organizations in a typical month?” The negative treatment effect stems from the control group being more likely than the treatment group to report outlandishly large numbers.

- The regressions also have enumerator fixed effects, community-level controls (Irbid/Mafraq governorate and population quartile), refugee household-level controls (shelter program, baseline number of children, baseline number of children plus adults), the Marlowe–Crowne scale, and respondent gender, education, and age. In the parentheses are robust standard errors clustered at the locality level.43 Statistical significance represented by * (10%), ** (5%), and *** (1%). Q-values are calculated per Anderson (2008) and correspond to Family 5 in the pre-analysis plan.