**Table (A.4)** Impacts of the Program on Neighbor’s Attitudes Toward Refugees (with Lee Bounds)

|**Outcome**|**TOT**|**(se)**|**FDR**<br>**q-values**|**Lower**<br>**Bound**|**Upper**<br>**Bound**|**Control**<br>**mean**|**(sd)**|**N**|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|**Panel A: Primary Outcomes**|||||||||
|Social attitudes & perceptions (SD)|-0.33**|(0.14)|[0.08]|-0.75***|-0.01|-0.00|(1.00)|1,102|
|Economic attitudes & perceptions (SD)|0.02|(0.16)|[0.56]|-0.55***|0.22|0.02|(1.02)|1,102|
|Policy preferences (SD)|0.17|(0.15)|[0.37]|-0.28*|0.49***|-0.02|(1.00)|1,102|
|Altruism to Syrians|0.21|(0.18)|[0.37]|-0.49***|0.47**|0.88|(1.18)|1,102|
|**Panel B: Selected Social Attitudes Inde**<br>Of the 3 people you exchange advice<br>with, how many are Syrian refugees?|**x Components**<br>-0.24**|(0.11)|[0.32]|-0.56***|-0.19*|0.34|(0.72)|1,102|
|Do the children in this household|||||||||
|have any Syrian refugee friends?|-0.19*|(0.11)|[0.37]|-0.33***|-0.11|0.40|(0.49)|704|
|**Panel C: Other Related Outcomes**|||||||||
|Days of media consumption (last week)|-1.08***|(0.40)|[0.08]|-1.69***|-0.04|4.78|(2.78)|1,102|
|Neighbor perceptions of average<br>refugee aid receipt (PPP)|-347.17***|(109.69)|[0.04]|-636.19***|-239.58**|630.84|(657.41)|685|
|Life Satisfaction (SD)|-0.32**|(0.15)|[0.06]|-0.62***|0.16|0.01|(0.98)|1,097|
|Subjective Health (SD)|-0.30*|(0.16)|[0.06]|-0.51***|0.25*|0.02|(0.99)|1,102|

_Notes:_ This table reports impacts of treatment on Jordanian neighbors of Syrian refugees in the experimental sample. Each row is its own dependent variable. Panel A reports pre-specified treatment effects on primary neighbor outcomes. All indices are standardized so that a positive point estimate reflects more “pro-refugee” sentiments. The only statistically significant outcome is a negative treatment effect on social attitudes and perceptions. This outcome is a standardized index of the following outcomes: out of 3 closest friends, how many are Syrian refugees; out of 3 people you exchange advice with, how many are Syrian refugees; do the children in this household have Syrian refugee friends (=1); do the children in this household share recreational spaces with Syrian refugee children (=1); how comfortable would you be accepting the marriage of a friend or loved one to a Syrian refugee (1-5); how comfortable would you be accepting a Syrian refugee as a neighbor (1-5); what is the net effect of Syrian refugees on Jordanian society (1-3); are Syrian refugees hardworking or lazy (1-7). Economic attitudes and perceptions is a standardized index of the following outcomes: an indicator =1 if the respondent listed “hosting Syrian refugees” as one of the most important challenges facing Jordan (options not read); an outcome with higher values for responses associated with beliefs that Syrian refugees pay more in taxes than Jordanians; an outcome with higher values for responses associated with refugees having a positive effect on the economy.Policy preferences in a standardized index of the following outcomes: less belief that Syrian refugees should be forced to live in camps; more belief that refugees should have the right to work outside camps; more belief that refugees should be able to attain Jordanian citizenship; more support for unrestricted work permits for refugees; more support for integrated classrooms with Syrians and Jordanians; more support for refugee right to enter/exit camps freely; support for housing assistance for Syrian refugees; belief that the international community should spend more money supporting refugees.Altruism to Syrians reports how many JD out of 5 the respondent allocated to a charity supporting syrian refugees. The other two options were allocating to a charity supporting low-income Jordanians or keeping for self. Panel B reports the two significant subcomponents of the social attitudes and perceptions index. Panel C reports other statistically significant treatment effects on neighbors. Subjective health is the response to “Would you describe your general health as good, fair, poor, or very poor? ” Life satisfaction is the response to “All things considered, how satisfied are you with your life as a whole these days on a scale of 1 to 10? ” Days of media consumption is the response to “In the past 7 days, how many days did you read or listen to the news from any source, including newspapers, online, WhatsApp, etc.?” Neighborhood perceptions of refugee aid reciept is the response to a question asking “Of the refugee households in your neighborhood who receive assistance, what do you think is the average value in Dinar of the assistance (in cash or in kind) that they receive from organizations in a typical month?” The sample size for this question is smaller due to the large number of “don’t know” responses. There is no treatment effect on the probability of reporting “don’t know” to this question. The regressions include month-by-year fixed effects, community-level controls (Irbid/Mafraq governorate and population quartile), and household-level controls (vulnerability-assessment quartile, shelter program, baseline number of children, baseline number of children plus adults, respondent gender, and respondent age). In parentheses are robust standard errors clustered at the locality level. Regressions are weighted by the number of people interviewed in each household. Statistical significance represented by * (10%), ** (5%), and *** (1%). Q-values are calculated per Anderson (2008) and correspond to various families in the pre-analysis plan. The lower and upper bounds refer to those proposed in Lee (2009) to correct for attrition.

A-5