**Table (4)** Pooled Treatment Effects on Primary Outcomes

|**Outcomes**|**Treatment**|**(se)**|**FDR**<br>**q-values**|**Control**<br>**mean**|**(sd)**|**N**|**Rounds**|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|**Panel A: Primary Outcomes**||||||||
|Overall Housing Quality (Z-Score)|0.31|(0.20)|[0.19]|-0.01|(1.00)|4,313|1, 2, 3|
|Total Monthly Housing Expenditures (USD PPP)|-82.05***|(32.07)|[0.07]|221.63|(202.26)|1,421|2|
|Food Consumption (Log USD PPP)|-0.02|(0.07)|[0.71]|4.39|(0.72)|2,780|2, 3|
|Log Total Consumption (Log USD PPP)|-0.03|(0.08)|[0.68]|8.73|(0.55)|1,422|2|
|CESD Score (Higher: Less Depression)|-0.10|(0.13)|[0.52]|0.01|(1.00)|4,302|1, 2, 3|
|SDQ Score (Higher: Better Child Wellbelling)|-0.34**|(0.15)|[0.07]|-0.01|(1.00)|1,782|2, 3|
|**Panel B: Other Outcomes**||||||||
|Respondent Hunger Last Week (=1)|0.18***|(0.05)|[0.01]|0.39|(0.49)|4,261|1, 2, 3|
|Adult Hunger Last Week (=1)|0.13***|(0.05)|[0.03]|0.36|(0.48)|4,177|1, 2, 3|
|Child Hunger Last Week (=1)|0.15***|(0.05)|[0.01]|0.25|(0.43)|3,813|1, 2, 3|
|At least 30 JD (95 USD PPP) in savings (=1)|0.08**|(0.04)|[0.05]|0.10|(0.30)|2,797|2, 3|

_Notes:_ This table reports 5 primary outcomes plus per capita food consumption (not pre-specified), pooled across as many rounds as were collected for each outcome. The table shows that treatment had no impact on housing quality on average over all 3 rounds, reduced housing expenditures at endline, had no impact on food consumption over endline and followup, had no impact on depression over all 3 rounds, and reduced child socio-emotional wellbeing over rounds 2 and 3. Overall Housing Quality is defined as a normalized housing quality index that includes indicators for quality floors, roofs, and walls, indicators for access to grid electricity and piped water, and the number of people per room. Total monthly housing expenditures is only reported for endline in the pooled table due to variations in measurement of housing expenditures across rounds and due to when treatment ended. Housing expenditure was measured including assistance payments at midline, and excluding assistance payments at endline since most recipients had stopped receiving payments but were still subject to rent freezes at part of the program. Results on housing expenditures in each round are reported in the appendix. Total consumption, including food and non-food expenses, was only measured at endline due to the length of the module. Reported in this table is food consumption, which was measured at endline and followup. Total food consumption is the log of the sum of food consumed in last seven days (Cereals and cereal products, Live animals, meat, and other parts of slaughtered land animals; Fish and other seafood; Milk, other dairy products, and eggs; Oils and fats; Fruits and nuts; Vegetables, tubers, pulses; Sugar and desserts; Ready-made food and other food products (baby food, spices)), plus home-produced foods produced in the last 7 days, plus assistance received in the last 30 days divided by 4.33. CES-D was measured in all rounds with exactly the same questionnaire. It includes 10 questions on depressive symptoms. Individuals who skipped more than 2 questions were marked as missing. The continuous scores were standardized with respect to the control group. The Child Strengths and Difficulties questionnaire (SDQ) was administered regarding a randomly selected child aged 3-8 at endline. At follow-up, the SDQ was administered regarding the same child. If not surveyed previously or if that child is no longer in the household, the survey was administered with respect to a randomly selected child age 4-9. The continuous scores were randomized with respect to the control group. At least 30 JD (95 USD PPP) in savings (=1) is an indicator equal to one if the respondent answered yes to “Do you currently have at least 30 JD (95 USD PPP) in personal savings you can draw from in an emergency? Whether or not it is in a bank?”. Respondent, adult, and child hunger last week are indicators equal to 1 if the respondent, other adults in the household or children in the household (respectively) went to bed hungry at least once in the last 7 days, zero otherwise. In the parentheses are robust standard errors clustered at the locality level. Regressions are weighted by the number of people interviewed in each household. Statistical significance represented by * (10%), ** (5%), and *** (1%). Q-values are calculated per Anderson (2008) and correspond to various families in the pre-analysis plan. Because not all outcomes are available in multiple rounds, some families include fewer outcomes in the pooled estimates than the round-by-round estimates.

44