Leo Strauss published a 1948 book dedicated to the study of this work, whose fourth chapter, "Of the Ceremonial Law," uses a comparison with the Far East to expand on arguments made about the origins and consequences of superstition in the preface.
Leo Strauss published a 1948 book dedicated to the study of this work, whose fourth chapter, "Of the Ceremonial Law," uses a comparison with the Far East to expand on arguments made about the origins and consequences of superstition in the preface. Chapter fifteen refutes Alpakhar's thesis that reason must be accommodated by Scripture and the book ends by asserting the independence of faith and reason, as well as the utility of revelation. The most important section, however, lays out the author's understanding of the Hebrew kingdom [*] following the death of Moses, and offers up reasons why religion should not have a monopoly on governmental policy. FTP, identify this work which decries belief in the irrational and outlines Benedict Spinoza's idea for a tolerant state.
Leo Strauss published a 1948 book dedicated to the study of this work, whose fourth chapter, "Of the Ceremonial Law," uses a comparison with the Far East to expand on arguments made about the origins and consequences of superstition in the preface.
{Tractatus Theologico-Politicus} (also accept {Theological Political Treatise})