The formulator of this term differentiated it from two similar cases by describing one as "assertoric," or impelled by the goal of happiness, and the other as "problematic," as its ends are optional.
The formulator of this term differentiated it from two similar cases by describing one as "assertoric," or impelled by the goal of happiness, and the other as "problematic," as its ends are optional. Habermas objected to this concept because it allows for monological justification of norms as opposed to societal determinations. Derek Parfit's application of it to the Prisoner's Dilemma contends that the optimal result is both players' cooperating and remaining silent. The idea of "defeasibility of duty" formulated by J.S. Mill counters this idea by stating that it provides no guidelines by which to determine the relative importance of moral acts when faced with conflicting duties. Its formulator countered Benjamin Constant's famous argument against it with his short essay "On a Supposed Right to Tell Lies from Benevolent Motives." FTP, name this central tenet of the moral philosophy of Immanuel Kant.
The formulator of this term differentiated it from two similar cases by describing one as "assertoric," or impelled by the goal of happiness, and the other as "problematic," as its ends are optional.
{categorical imperative}