In C.S. Peirce's "beta graphs," this philosophical property is indicated by a dot; Peirce defined this property as "reaction with the environment."
In C.S. Peirce's "beta graphs," this philosophical property is indicated by a dot; Peirce defined this property as "reaction with the environment." Richard Routley coined a term for a school of thought that holds that "particular" quantification can occur over things that do not possess this property. Objects without this property are said to reside in "Meinong's jungle," as Alexius Meinong argued that objects of intentionality can possess "givenness" without this property. A work titled for this concept states that nothing composed of "simple parts" can possess this property; and that although this property is not identical with (*) reality, all real things possess this property. That work by J.M.E. McTaggart is titled for The Nature of this property. Both Kant and Frege argued that this concept is not a primary property of individuals or objects, in their rejection of an argument by Anselm. For 10 points, what property does the ontological argument claim that God possesses? 
In C.S. Peirce's "beta graphs," this philosophical property is indicated by a dot; Peirce defined this property as "reaction with the environment."
existence [accept word forms, such as "it exists"; generously accept being, even though it does not apply to all clues; prompt on "ontology"; do NOT accept or prompt on "reality"]