In its 11th and final section the author distinguishes between the extreme and moderate forms of antecedent and consequent, the two types of skepticism.
In its 11th and final section the author distinguishes between the extreme and moderate forms of antecedent and consequent, the two types of skepticism. It is concluded that the skepticism of this work is consequent, and that our belief of the real world is not rationally justified. It also attempts to resolve the difference between "relations of ideas" and "matters of facts" after the author has first distinguished impressions and ideas. First published in 1748, it was a reworking of the author's Treatise of Human Nature. FTP, name this work by David Hume often confused with an "Essay" by John Locke.
In its 11th and final section the author distinguishes between the extreme and moderate forms of antecedent and consequent, the two types of skepticism.
An {Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding}