In this case, the Supreme Court reversed the stance that it took in Colegrove v. Green, in which it declared the central issue of this case a "political thicket" into which the judiciary would not intrude.
In this case, the Supreme Court reversed the stance that it took in Colegrove v. Green, in which it declared the central issue of this case a "political thicket" into which the judiciary would not intrude. The principle it established was actually first announced in Gray v. Saunders, and the dissent he wrote in this case was the last opinion issued by Frankfurter before his retirement. FTP, identify this 1962 decision that forced the Tennessee legislature to reapportion itself on the basis of population following the "one-person, one-vote" principle.
In this case, the Supreme Court reversed the stance that it took in Colegrove v. Green, in which it declared the central issue of this case a "political thicket" into which the judiciary would not intrude.
{Baker v. Carr}