The second part of this work uses the analogy of the formation of sulfrous acid in the presence of a platinum catalyst, and its final short section proposes to "halt at the frontier of metaphysics or mysticism."
The second part of this work uses the analogy of the formation of sulfrous acid in the presence of a platinum catalyst, and its final short section proposes to "halt at the frontier of metaphysics or mysticism." This work attacks what its author refers to as "the metaphysical theory of the substantial unity of the soul," arguing that the type of person about whom this work is written does not have a (*) "personality" but "a particular medium." According to this work, the possessor of the title quality must undergo "a continual self-sacrifice," and argues that "it is in this depersonalization that art may be said to approach the condition of science." This essay states that the first title concept "cannot be inherited, and if you want it, you must obtain it by great labour," and that its key component is "the historical sense." Arguing that the significance of a poet "is the appreciation of his relation to the dead poets and artists," for 10 points, identify this critical essay by T.S. Eliot.
The second part of this work uses the analogy of the formation of sulfrous acid in the presence of a platinum catalyst, and its final short section proposes to "halt at the frontier of metaphysics or mysticism."
“{Tradition and the Individual Talent}”