In this work one character makes the claim that no one would poorly influence his neighbors knowing that making his neighbors worse would ultimately hurt himself.
In this work one character makes the claim that no one would poorly influence his neighbors knowing that making his neighbors worse would ultimately hurt himself. The first chapter of Nietzsche's Ecce Homo describes it as a book in the tradition established by this work, whose central figure gives an account of himself as a gadfly, and goes on to discuss how Caerepon came to the Delphic oracle and discovered that the wisest of all men was that speaker. This work proceeds with a discussion of its speaker's systematic (*) questioning of all the seemingly intelligent men around him, and is based on an answer to the arguments of Anytus. The speaker of this work asserts that he only knows that he knows nothing, and is able to show that Meletus has made a contradictory account of his irreligion by claiming both that Socrates both invents new gods and is an atheist, he still ends up getting sentenced to death, having rejected the chance to flee in the earlier dialogue, Creto. FTP, identify this Platonic dialogue in which Socrates is tried for corrupting the youth of Athens, whose title reflects the presented logical defense rather than an expression of regret and culpability.
In this work one character makes the claim that no one would poorly influence his neighbors knowing that making his neighbors worse would ultimately hurt himself.
{Apology}