One interpretation of this man's work asks how we know the plus sign won't return a sum of 5for high inputs by acting as a "quus sign".
One interpretation of this man's work asks how we know the plus sign won't return a sum of 5for high inputs by acting as a "quus sign". This deviser of the rule-following problem called factswith no factual subparts "atomic facts" in his early period, rejecting that idea in favor ofnon-overlapping connections between terms, dubbed "family resemblances." Moritz Schlick invitedthis man to talk to the (*) Vienna Circle, which loved his work. This man described two constructionworkers in one example of a "language game;" he dismissed private languages in PhilosophicalInvestigations, and claimed that "what we cannot speak about we must pass over in silence." For 10 points,name this eccentric Austrian author of Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus.
One interpretation of this man's work asks how we know the plus sign won't return a sum of 5for high inputs by acting as a "quus sign".
Ludwig Wittgenstein