The author of this work later revises his point about the self- applicability of definitions when in discussion of the paradox of analysis.
The author of this work later revises his point about the self- applicability of definitions when in discussion of the paradox of analysis. This work represents a rejection of the idealist philosophical stance adopted by his mentor F.H. Bradley, and McTaggart. In Chapter III entitled "Hedonism," the discussion on beauty and friendship is cited as explicit influence on members of the Bloomsbury Group. Representing what is known in the titular field of philosophy as the "linguistic turn," the author suggests that any definition of good remains an "open question" and that the references to nature to seek guidance for moral behavior will generate his so-called "naturalistic fallacy."  Written in 1903, for 10 points, name this fundamental work of ethical philosophy by G.E. Moore.
The author of this work later revises his point about the self- applicability of definitions when in discussion of the paradox of analysis.
Principia Ethica