pwc-archive/papers-with-abstracts huggingface dataset:
Towards Massive Multilingual Holistic Bias
Authors: Xiaoqing Ellen Tan, Prangthip Hansanti, Carleigh Wood, Bokai Yu, Christophe Ropers, Marta R. Costa-jussà
Date: 2024-06-29 00:00:00
Tasks: Machine Translation, Sentence, Text Generation, Translation

In the current landscape of automatic language generation, there is a need to understand, evaluate, and mitigate demographic biases as existing models are becoming increasingly multilingual. To address this, we present the initial eight languages from the MASSIVE MULTILINGUAL HOLISTICBIAS (MMHB) dataset and benchmark consisting of approximately 6 million sentences representing 13 demographic axes. We propose an automatic construction methodology to further scale up MMHB sentences in terms of both language coverage and size, leveraging limited human annotation. Our approach utilizes placeholders in multilingual sentence construction and employs a systematic method to independently translate sentence patterns, nouns, and descriptors. Combined with human translation, this technique carefully designs placeholders to dynamically generate multiple sentence variations and significantly reduces the human translation workload. The translation process has been meticulously conducted to avoid an English-centric perspective and include all necessary morphological variations for languages that require them, improving from the original English HOLISTICBIAS. Finally, we utilize MMHB to report results on gender bias and added toxicity in machine translation tasks. On the gender analysis, MMHB unveils: (1) a lack of gender robustness showing almost +4 chrf points in average for masculine semantic sentences compared to feminine ones and (2) a preference to overgeneralize to masculine forms by reporting more than +12 chrf points in average when evaluating with masculine compared to feminine references. MMHB triggers added toxicity up to 2.3%.
Large Language Models for Power Scheduling: A User-Centric Approach
Authors: Thomas Mongaillard, Samson Lasaulce, Othman Hicheur, Chao Zhang, Lina Bariah, Vineeth S. Varma, Hang Zou, Qiyang Zhao, Merouane Debbah
Date: 2024-06-29 00:00:00
Tasks: Intent Recognition, Prompt Engineering, Scheduling

While traditional optimization and scheduling schemes are designed to meet fixed, predefined system requirements, future systems are moving toward user-driven approaches and personalized services, aiming to achieve high quality-of-experience (QoE) and flexibility. This challenge is particularly pronounced in wireless and digitalized energy networks, where users' requirements have largely not been taken into consideration due to the lack of a common language between users and machines. The emergence of powerful large language models (LLMs) marks a radical departure from traditional system-centric methods into more advanced user-centric approaches by providing a natural communication interface between users and devices. In this paper, for the first time, we introduce a novel architecture for resource scheduling problems by constructing three LLM agents to convert an arbitrary user's voice request (VRQ) into a resource allocation vector. Specifically, we design an LLM intent recognition agent to translate the request into an optimization problem (OP), an LLM OP parameter identification agent, and an LLM OP solving agent. To evaluate system performance, we construct a database of typical VRQs in the context of electric vehicle (EV) charging. As a proof of concept, we primarily use Llama 3 8B. Through testing with different prompt engineering scenarios, the obtained results demonstrate the efficiency of the proposed architecture. The conducted performance analysis allows key insights to be extracted. For instance, having a larger set of candidate OPs to model the real-world problem might degrade the final performance because of a higher recognition/OP classification noise level. All results and codes are open source.
Classifier identification in Ancient Egyptian as a low-resource sequence-labelling task
Authors: Dmitry Nikolaev, Jorke Grotenhuis, Haleli Harel, Orly Goldwasser
Date: 2024-06-29 00:00:00

The complex Ancient Egyptian (AE) writing system was characterised by widespread use of graphemic classifiers (determinatives): silent (unpronounced) hieroglyphic signs clarifying the meaning or indicating the pronunciation of the host word. The study of classifiers has intensified in recent years with the launch and quick growth of the iClassifier project, a web-based platform for annotation and analysis of classifiers in ancient and modern languages. Thanks to the data contributed by the project participants, it is now possible to formulate the identification of classifiers in AE texts as an NLP task. In this paper, we make first steps towards solving this task by implementing a series of sequence-labelling neural models, which achieve promising performance despite the modest amount of training data. We discuss tokenisation and operationalisation issues arising from tackling AE texts and contrast our approach with frequency-based baselines.
Polarization and Morality: Lexical Analysis of Abortion Discourse on Reddit
Authors: Tessa Stanier, Hagyeong Shin
Date: 2024-06-29 00:00:00
Tasks: Lexical Analysis

This study investigates whether division on political topics is mapped with the distinctive patterns of language use. We collect a total 145,832 Reddit comments on the abortion debate and explore the languages of subreddit communities r/prolife and r/prochoice. With consideration of the Moral Foundations Theory, we examine lexical patterns in three ways. First, we compute proportional frequencies of lexical items from the Moral Foundations Dictionary in order to make inferences about each group's moral considerations when forming arguments for and against abortion. We then create n-gram models to reveal frequent collocations from each stance group and better understand how commonly used words are patterned in their linguistic context and in relation to morality values. Finally, we use Latent Dirichlet Allocation to identify underlying topical structures in the corpus data. Results show that the use of morality words is mapped with the stances on abortion.
Self-Translate-Train: Enhancing Cross-Lingual Transfer of Large Language Models via Inherent Capability
Authors: Ryokan Ri, Shun Kiyono, Sho Takase
Date: 2024-06-29 00:00:00
Tasks: Cross-Lingual Transfer, Language Modelling, Large Language Model, Translation, Zero-Shot Cross-Lingual Transfer

Zero-shot cross-lingual transfer by fine-tuning multilingual pretrained models shows promise for low-resource languages, but often suffers from misalignment of internal representations between languages. We hypothesize that even when the model cannot generalize across languages effectively in fine-tuning, it still captures cross-lingual correspondence useful for cross-lingual transfer. We explore this hypothesis with Self-Translate-Train, a method that lets large language models (LLMs) to translate training data into the target language and fine-tunes the model on its own generated data. By demonstrating that Self-Translate-Train outperforms zero-shot transfer, we encourage further exploration of better methods to elicit cross-lingual capabilities of LLMs.
PerSEval: Assessing Personalization in Text Summarizers
Authors: Sourish Dasgupta, Ankush Chander, Parth Borad, Isha Motiyani, Tanmoy Chakraborty
Date: 2024-06-29 00:00:00
Tasks: Benchmarking, Human Judgment Correlation

Personalized summarization models cater to individuals' subjective understanding of saliency, as represented by their reading history and current topics of attention. Existing personalized text summarizers are primarily evaluated based on accuracy measures such as BLEU, ROUGE, and METEOR. However, a recent study argued that accuracy measures are inadequate for evaluating the degree of personalization of these models and proposed EGISES, the first metric to evaluate personalized text summaries. It was suggested that accuracy is a separate aspect and should be evaluated standalone. In this paper, we challenge the necessity of an accuracy leaderboard, suggesting that relying on accuracy-based aggregated results might lead to misleading conclusions. To support this, we delve deeper into EGISES, demonstrating both theoretically and empirically that it measures the degree of responsiveness, a necessary but not sufficient condition for degree-of-personalization. We subsequently propose PerSEval, a novel measure that satisfies the required sufficiency condition. Based on the benchmarking of ten SOTA summarization models on the PENS dataset, we empirically establish that -- (i) PerSEval is reliable w.r.t human-judgment correlation (Pearson's r = 0.73; Spearman's $\rho$ = 0.62; Kendall's $\tau$ = 0.42), (ii) PerSEval has high rank-stability, (iii) PerSEval as a rank-measure is not entailed by EGISES-based ranking, and (iv) PerSEval can be a standalone rank-measure without the need of any aggregated ranking.
A Recipe of Parallel Corpora Exploitation for Multilingual Large Language Models
Authors: Peiqin Lin, André F. T. Martins, Hinrich Schütze
Date: 2024-06-29 00:00:00
Tasks: Language Identification, Machine Translation, Sentence, text-classification, Text Classification, Translation

Recent studies have highlighted the potential of exploiting parallel corpora to enhance multilingual large language models, improving performance in both bilingual tasks, e.g., machine translation, and general-purpose tasks, e.g., text classification. Building upon these findings, our comprehensive study aims to identify the most effective strategies for leveraging parallel corpora. We investigate the impact of parallel corpora quality and quantity, training objectives, and model size on the performance of multilingual large language models enhanced with parallel corpora across diverse languages and tasks. Our analysis reveals several key insights: (i) filtering noisy translations is essential for effectively exploiting parallel corpora, while language identification and short sentence filtering have little effect; (ii) even a corpus containing just 10K parallel sentences can yield results comparable to those obtained from much larger datasets; (iii) employing only the machine translation objective yields the best results among various training objectives and their combinations; (iv) larger multilingual language models benefit more from parallel corpora than smaller models due to their stronger capacity for cross-task transfer. Our study offers valuable insights into the optimal utilization of parallel corpora to enhance multilingual large language models, extending the generalizability of previous findings from limited languages and tasks to a broader range of scenarios.
Brevity is the soul of wit: Pruning long files for code generation
Authors: Aaditya K. Singh, Yu Yang, Kushal Tirumala, Mostafa Elhoushi, Ari S. Morcos
Date: 2024-06-29 00:00:00
Tasks: Code Generation, HumanEval, mbpp

Data curation is commonly considered a "secret-sauce" for LLM training, with higher quality data usually leading to better LLM performance. Given the scale of internet-scraped corpora, data pruning has become a larger and larger focus. Specifically, many have shown that de-duplicating data, or sub-selecting higher quality data, can lead to efficiency or performance improvements. Generally, three types of methods are used to filter internet-scale corpora: embedding-based, heuristic-based, and classifier-based. In this work, we contrast the former two in the domain of finetuning LLMs for code generation. We find that embedding-based methods are often confounded by length, and that a simple heuristic--pruning long files--outperforms other methods in compute-limited regimes. Our method can yield up to a 2x efficiency benefit in training (while matching performance) or a 3.5% absolute performance improvement on HumanEval (while matching compute). However, we find that perplexity on held-out long files can increase, begging the question of whether optimizing data mixtures for common coding benchmarks (HumanEval, MBPP) actually best serves downstream use cases. Overall, we hope our work builds useful intuitions about code data (specifically, the low quality of extremely long code files) provides a compelling heuristic-based method for data pruning, and brings to light questions in how we evaluate code generation models.
Too Late to Train, Too Early To Use? A Study on Necessity and Viability of Low-Resource Bengali LLMs
Authors: Tamzeed Mahfuz, Satak Kumar Dey, Ruwad Naswan, Hasnaen Adil, Khondker Salman Sayeed, HAZ Sameen Shahgir
Date: 2024-06-29 00:00:00
Tasks: Cross-Lingual Transfer, Decoder, Natural Language Inference, Question Answering, Script Generation

Each new generation of English-oriented Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibits enhanced cross-lingual transfer capabilities and significantly outperforms older LLMs on low-resource languages. This prompts the question: Is there a need for LLMs dedicated to a particular low-resource language? We aim to explore this question for Bengali, a low-to-moderate resource Indo-Aryan language native to the Bengal region of South Asia. We compare the performance of open-weight and closed-source LLMs such as LLaMA-3 and GPT-4 against fine-tuned encoder-decoder models across a diverse set of Bengali downstream tasks, including translation, summarization, paraphrasing, question-answering, and natural language inference. Our findings reveal that while LLMs generally excel in reasoning tasks, their performance in tasks requiring Bengali script generation is inconsistent. Key challenges include inefficient tokenization of Bengali script by existing LLMs, leading to increased computational costs and potential performance degradation. Additionally, we highlight biases in machine-translated datasets commonly used for Bengali NLP tasks. We conclude that there is a significant need for a Bengali-oriented LLM, but the field currently lacks the high-quality pretraining and instruction-tuning datasets necessary to develop a highly effective model.
SHADE: Semantic Hypernym Annotator for Domain-specific Entities -- DnD Domain Use Case
Authors: Akila Peiris, Nisansa de Silva
Date: 2024-06-29 00:00:00

Manual data annotation is an important NLP task but one that takes considerable amount of resources and effort. In spite of the costs, labeling and categorizing entities is essential for NLP tasks such as semantic evaluation. Even though annotation can be done by non-experts in most cases, due to the fact that this requires human labor, the process is costly. Another major challenge encountered in data annotation is maintaining the annotation consistency. Annotation efforts are typically carried out by teams of multiple annotators. The annotations need to maintain the consistency in relation to both the domain truth and annotation format while reducing human errors. Annotating a specialized domain that deviates significantly from the general domain, such as fantasy literature, will see a lot of human error and annotator disagreement. So it is vital that proper guidelines and error reduction mechanisms are enforced. One such way to enforce these constraints is using a specialized application. Such an app can ensure that the notations are consistent, and the labels can be pre-defined or restricted reducing the room for errors. In this paper, we present SHADE, an annotation software that can be used to annotate entities in the high fantasy literature domain. Specifically in Dungeons and Dragons lore extracted from the Forgotten Realms Fandom Wiki.
Advancing Process Verification for Large Language Models via Tree-Based Preference Learning
Authors: Mingqian He, Yongliang Shen, Wenqi Zhang, Zeqi Tan, Weiming Lu
Date: 2024-06-29 00:00:00
Tasks: Binary Classification, GSM8K, Math, StrategyQA

Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable potential in handling complex reasoning tasks by generating step-by-step rationales.Some methods have proven effective in boosting accuracy by introducing extra verifiers to assess these paths. However, existing verifiers, typically trained on binary-labeled reasoning paths, fail to fully utilize the relative merits of intermediate steps, thereby limiting the effectiveness of the feedback provided. To overcome this limitation, we propose Tree-based Preference Learning Verifier (Tree-PLV), a novel approach that constructs reasoning trees via a best-first search algorithm and collects step-level paired data for preference training. Compared to traditional binary classification, step-level preferences more finely capture the nuances between reasoning steps, allowing for a more precise evaluation of the complete reasoning path. We empirically evaluate Tree-PLV across a range of arithmetic and commonsense reasoning tasks, where it significantly outperforms existing benchmarks. For instance, Tree-PLV achieved substantial performance gains over the Mistral-7B self-consistency baseline on GSM8K (67.55% to 82.79%), MATH (17.00% to 26.80%), CSQA (68.14% to 72.97%), and StrategyQA (82.86% to 83.25%).Additionally, our study explores the appropriate granularity for applying preference learning, revealing that step-level guidance provides feedback that better aligns with the evaluation of the reasoning process.
How to Train Your Fact Verifier: Knowledge Transfer with Multimodal Open Models
Authors: Jaeyoung Lee, Ximing Lu, Jack Hessel, Faeze Brahman, Youngjae Yu, Yonatan Bisk, Yejin Choi, Saadia Gabriel
Date: 2024-06-29 00:00:00
Tasks: Fact Checking, Misinformation, Stance Detection, Transfer Learning

Given the growing influx of misinformation across news and social media, there is a critical need for systems that can provide effective real-time verification of news claims. Large language or multimodal model based verification has been proposed to scale up online policing mechanisms for mitigating spread of false and harmful content. While these can potentially reduce burden on human fact-checkers, such efforts may be hampered by foundation model training data becoming outdated. In this work, we test the limits of improving foundation model performance without continual updating through an initial study of knowledge transfer using either existing intra- and inter- domain benchmarks or explanations generated from large language models (LLMs). We evaluate on 12 public benchmarks for fact-checking and misinformation detection as well as two other tasks relevant to content moderation -- toxicity and stance detection. Our results on two recent multi-modal fact-checking benchmarks, Mocheg and Fakeddit, indicate that knowledge transfer strategies can improve Fakeddit performance over the state-of-the-art by up to 1.7% and Mocheg performance by up to 2.9%.
Financial Knowledge Large Language Model
Authors: Cehao Yang, Chengjin Xu, Yiyan Qi
Date: 2024-06-29 00:00:00
Tasks: Few-Shot Learning, Financial Analysis, Language Modeling, Language Modelling, Large Language Model, model, Question Answering

Artificial intelligence is making significant strides in the finance industry, revolutionizing how data is processed and interpreted. Among these technologies, large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated substantial potential to transform financial services by automating complex tasks, enhancing customer service, and providing detailed financial analysis. Firstly, we introduce IDEA-FinBench, an evaluation benchmark specifically tailored for assessing financial knowledge in large language models (LLMs). This benchmark utilizes questions from two globally respected and authoritative financial professional exams, aimimg to comprehensively evaluate the capability of LLMs to directly address exam questions pertinent to the finance sector. Secondly, we propose IDEA-FinKER, a Financial Knowledge Enhancement framework designed to facilitate the rapid adaptation of general LLMs to the financial domain, introducing a retrieval-based few-shot learning method for real-time context-level knowledge injection, and a set of high-quality financial knowledge instructions for fine-tuning any general LLM. Finally, we present IDEA-FinQA, a financial question-answering system powered by LLMs. This system is structured around a scheme of real-time knowledge injection and factual enhancement using external knowledge. IDEA-FinQA is comprised of three main modules: the data collector, the data querying module, and LLM-based agents tasked with specific functions.
Iterative Data Generation with Large Language Models for Aspect-based Sentiment Analysis
Authors: Qihuang Zhong, Haiyun Li, Luyao Zhuang, Juhua Liu, Bo Du
Date: 2024-06-29 00:00:00
Tasks: Aspect-Based Sentiment Analysis, Aspect-Based Sentiment Analysis (ABSA), Data Augmentation, Diversity, In-Context Learning, Instruction Following, Pseudo Label, Sentence, Sentiment Analysis

Aspect-based Sentiment Analysis (ABSA) is an important sentiment analysis task, which aims to determine the sentiment polarity towards an aspect in a sentence. Due to the expensive and limited labeled data, data generation (DG) has become the standard for improving the performance of ABSA. However, current DG methods usually have some shortcomings: 1) poor fluency and coherence, 2) lack of diversity of generated data, and 3) reliance on some existing labeled data, hindering its applications in real-world scenarios. With the advancement of large language models (LLMs), LLM-based DG has the potential to solve the above issues. Unfortunately, directly prompting LLMs struggles to generate the desired pseudo-label ABSA data, as LLMs are prone to hallucinations, leading to undesired data generation. To this end, we propose a systematic Iterative Data Generation framework, namely IDG, to boost the performance of ABSA. The core of IDG is to make full use of the powerful abilities (i.e., instruction-following, in-context learning and self-reflection) of LLMs to iteratively generate more fluent and diverse pseudo-label data, starting from an unsupervised sentence corpus. Specifically, IDG designs a novel iterative data generation mechanism and a self-reflection data filtering module to tackle the challenges of unexpected data generation caused by hallucinations. Extensive experiments on four widely-used ABSA benchmarks show that IDG brings consistent and significant performance gains among five baseline ABSA models. More encouragingly, the synthetic data generated by IDG can achieve comparable or even better performance against the manually annotated data.
LLM-Generated Natural Language Meets Scaling Laws: New Explorations and Data Augmentation Methods
Authors: Zhenhua Wang, Guang Xu, Ming Ren
Date: 2024-06-29 00:00:00
Tasks: Data Augmentation, Few-Shot Text Classification, text-classification, Text Classification

With the ascent of large language models (LLM), natural language processing has witnessed enhancements, such as LLM-based data augmentation. Nonetheless, prior research harbors two primary concerns: firstly, a lack of contemplation regarding whether the natural language generated by LLM (LLMNL) truly aligns with human natural language (HNL), a critical foundational question; secondly, an oversight that augmented data is randomly generated by LLM, implying that not all data may possess equal training value, that could impede the performance of classifiers. To address these challenges, we introduce the scaling laws to intrinsically calculate LLMNL and HNL. Through extensive experiments, we reveal slight deviations (approximately 0.2 Mandelbrot exponent) from Mandelbrot's law in LLMNL, underscore a complexity advantage in HNL, and supplement an interpretive discussion on language style. This establishes a solid foundation for LLM's expansion. Further, we introduce a novel data augmentation method for few-shot text classification, termed ZGPTDA, which leverages fuzzy computing mechanisms driven by the conformity to scaling laws to make decisions about GPT-4 augmented data. Extensive experiments, conducted in real-world scenarios, confirms the effectiveness (improving F1 of Bert and RoBerta by 7-10%) and competitiveness (surpassing recent AugGPT and GENCO methods by about 2% accuracy on DeBerta) of ZGPTDA. In addition, we reveal some interesting insights, e.g., Hilberg's law and Taylor's law can impart more benefits to text classification, etc.