pwc-archive/papers-with-abstracts huggingface dataset:
CoinMath: Harnessing the Power of Coding Instruction for Math LLMs
Authors: Chengwei Wei, Bin Wang, Jung-jae Kim, Guimei Liu, Nancy F. Chen
Date: 2024-12-16 00:00:00
Tasks: Descriptive, Math, Mathematical Reasoning

Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown strong performance in solving mathematical problems, with code-based solutions proving particularly effective. However, the best practice to leverage coding instruction data to enhance mathematical reasoning remains underexplored. This study investigates three key questions: (1) How do different coding styles of mathematical code-based rationales impact LLMs' learning performance? (2) Can general-domain coding instructions improve performance? (3) How does integrating textual rationales with code-based ones during training enhance mathematical reasoning abilities? Our findings reveal that code-based rationales with concise comments, descriptive naming, and hardcoded solutions are beneficial, while improvements from general-domain coding instructions and textual rationales are relatively minor. Based on these insights, we propose CoinMath, a learning strategy designed to enhance mathematical reasoning by diversifying the coding styles of code-based rationales. CoinMath generates a variety of code-based rationales incorporating concise comments, descriptive naming conventions, and hardcoded solutions. Experimental results demonstrate that CoinMath significantly outperforms its baseline model, MAmmoTH, one of the SOTA math LLMs.
Self-Adaptive Paraphrasing and Preference Learning for Improved Claim Verifiability
Authors: Amelie Wührl, Roman Klinger
Date: 2024-12-16 00:00:00
Tasks: Fact Checking

In fact-checking, structure and phrasing of claims critically influence a model's ability to predict verdicts accurately. Social media content in particular rarely serves as optimal input for verification systems, which necessitates pre-processing to extract the claim from noisy context before fact checking. Prior work suggests extracting a claim representation that humans find to be checkworthy and verifiable. This has two limitations: (1) the format may not be optimal for a fact-checking model, and (2), it requires annotated data to learn the extraction task from. We address both issues and propose a method to extract claims that is not reliant on labeled training data. Instead, our self-adaptive approach only requires a black-box fact checking model and a generative language model (LM). Given a tweet, we iteratively optimize the LM to generate a claim paraphrase that increases the performance of a fact checking model. By learning from preference pairs, we align the LM to the fact checker using direct preference optimization. We show that this novel setup extracts a claim paraphrase that is more verifiable than their original social media formulations, and is on par with competitive baselines. For refuted claims, our method consistently outperforms all baselines.
On Crowdsourcing Task Design for Discourse Relation Annotation
Authors: Frances Yung, Vera Demberg
Date: 2024-12-16 00:00:00
Tasks: Relation

Interpreting implicit discourse relations involves complex reasoning, requiring the integration of semantic cues with background knowledge, as overt connectives like because or then are absent. These relations often allow multiple interpretations, best represented as distributions. In this study, we compare two established methods that crowdsource English implicit discourse relation annotation by connective insertion: a free-choice approach, which allows annotators to select any suitable connective, and a forced-choice approach, which asks them to select among a set of predefined options. Specifically, we re-annotate the whole DiscoGeM 1.0 corpus -- initially annotated with the free-choice method -- using the forced-choice approach. The free-choice approach allows for flexible and intuitive insertion of various connectives, which are context-dependent. Comparison among over 130,000 annotations, however, shows that the free-choice strategy produces less diverse annotations, often converging on common labels. Analysis of the results reveals the interplay between task design and the annotators' abilities to interpret and produce discourse relations.
Fool Me, Fool Me: User Attitudes Toward LLM Falsehoods
Authors: Diana Bar-Or Nirman, Ariel Weizman, Amos Azaria
Date: 2024-12-16 00:00:00

While Large Language Models (LLMs) have become central tools in various fields, they often provide inaccurate or false information. This study examines user preferences regarding falsehood responses from LLMs. Specifically, we evaluate preferences for LLM responses where false statements are explicitly marked versus unmarked responses and preferences for confident falsehoods compared to LLM disclaimers acknowledging a lack of knowledge. Additionally, we investigate how requiring users to assess the truthfulness of statements influences these preferences. Surprisingly, 61\% of users prefer unmarked falsehood responses over marked ones, and 69\% prefer confident falsehoods over LLMs admitting lack of knowledge. In all our experiments, a total of 300 users participated, contributing valuable data to our analysis and conclusions. When users are required to evaluate the truthfulness of statements, preferences for unmarked and falsehood responses decrease slightly but remain high. These findings suggest that user preferences, which influence LLM training via feedback mechanisms, may inadvertently encourage the generation of falsehoods. Future research should address the ethical and practical implications of aligning LLM behavior with such preferences.
MT-LENS: An all-in-one Toolkit for Better Machine Translation Evaluation
Authors: Javier García Gilabert, Carlos Escolano, Audrey Mash, Xixian Liao, Maite Melero
Date: 2024-12-16 00:00:00
Tasks: All, Benchmarking, Bias Detection, Gender Bias Detection, Machine Translation, NMT, Translation

We introduce MT-LENS, a framework designed to evaluate Machine Translation (MT) systems across a variety of tasks, including translation quality, gender bias detection, added toxicity, and robustness to misspellings. While several toolkits have become very popular for benchmarking the capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs), existing evaluation tools often lack the ability to thoroughly assess the diverse aspects of MT performance. MT-LENS addresses these limitations by extending the capabilities of LM-eval-harness for MT, supporting state-of-the-art datasets and a wide range of evaluation metrics. It also offers a user-friendly platform to compare systems and analyze translations with interactive visualizations. MT-LENS aims to broaden access to evaluation strategies that go beyond traditional translation quality evaluation, enabling researchers and engineers to better understand the performance of a NMT model and also easily measure system's biases.
AUEB-Archimedes at RIRAG-2025: Is obligation concatenation really all you need?
Authors: Ioannis Chasandras, Odysseas S. Chlapanis, Ion Androutsopoulos
Date: 2024-12-16 00:00:00
Tasks: All, Retrieval

This paper presents the systems we developed for RIRAG-2025, a shared task that requires answering regulatory questions by retrieving relevant passages. The generated answers are evaluated using RePASs, a reference-free and model-based metric. Our systems use a combination of three retrieval models and a reranker. We show that by exploiting a neural component of RePASs that extracts important sentences ('obligations') from the retrieved passages, we achieve a dubiously high score (0.947), even though the answers are directly extracted from the retrieved passages and are not actually generated answers. We then show that by selecting the answer with the best RePASs among a few generated alternatives and then iteratively refining this answer by reducing contradictions and covering more obligations, we can generate readable, coherent answers that achieve a more plausible and relatively high score (0.639).
The Role of Natural Language Processing Tasks in Automatic Literary Character Network Construction
Authors: Arthur Amalvy, Vincent Labatut, Richard Dufour
Date: 2024-12-16 00:00:00
Tasks: coreference-resolution, Coreference Resolution, named-entity-recognition, Named Entity Recognition, Named Entity Recognition (NER), NER

The automatic extraction of character networks from literary texts is generally carried out using natural language processing (NLP) cascading pipelines. While this approach is widespread, no study exists on the impact of low-level NLP tasks on their performance. In this article, we conduct such a study on a literary dataset, focusing on the role of named entity recognition (NER) and coreference resolution when extracting co-occurrence networks. To highlight the impact of these tasks' performance, we start with gold-standard annotations, progressively add uniformly distributed errors, and observe their impact in terms of character network quality. We demonstrate that NER performance depends on the tested novel and strongly affects character detection. We also show that NER-detected mentions alone miss a lot of character co-occurrences, and that coreference resolution is needed to prevent this. Finally, we present comparison points with 2 methods based on large language models (LLMs), including a fully end-to-end one, and show that these models are outperformed by traditional NLP pipelines in terms of recall.
Let your LLM generate a few tokens and you will reduce the need for retrieval
Authors: Hervé Déjean
Date: 2024-12-16 00:00:00
Tasks: RAG, Reranking

In this paper, we investigate how efficiently large language models (LLM) can be trained to check whether an answer is already stored in their parametric memory. We distill an LLM-as-a-judge to compute the IK (I Know) score. We found that this method is particularly beneficial in the context of retrieval-assisted augmented generation (RAG), with a respectable accuracy of 80%. It enables a significant reduction (more than 50%) in the number of search and reranking steps required for certain data sets. We have also introduced the IK score, which serves as a useful tool for characterising datasets by facilitating the classification task. Interestingly, through the inclusion of response tokens as input, our results suggest that only about 20,000 training samples are required to achieve good performance. The central element of this work is the use of a teacher model - the LLM as a judge - to generate training data. We also assess the robustness of the IK classifier by evaluating it with various types of teachers, including both string-based methods and LLMs, with the latter providing better results.
FTP: A Fine-grained Token-wise Pruner for Large Language Models via Token Routing
Authors: Zekai Li, Jintu Zheng, Ji Liu, Han Liu, Haowei Zhu, Zeping Li, Fuwei Yang, Haiduo Huang, Jinzhang Peng, Dong Li, Lu Tian, Emad Barsoum
Date: 2024-12-16 00:00:00

Recently, large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated superior performance across various tasks by adhering to scaling laws, which significantly increase model size. However, the huge computation overhead during inference hinders the deployment in industrial applications. Many works leverage traditional compression approaches to boost model inference, but these always introduce additional training costs to restore the performance and the pruning results typically show noticeable performance drops compared to the original model when aiming for a specific level of acceleration. To address these issues, we propose a fine-grained token-wise pruning approach for the LLMs, which presents a learnable router to adaptively identify the less important tokens and skip them across model blocks to reduce computational cost during inference. To construct the router efficiently, we present a search-based sparsity scheduler for pruning sparsity allocation, a trainable router combined with our proposed four low-dimensional factors as input and three proposed losses. We conduct extensive experiments across different benchmarks on different LLMs to demonstrate the superiority of our method. Our approach achieves state-of-the-art (SOTA) pruning results, surpassing other existing pruning methods. For instance, our method outperforms BlockPruner and ShortGPT by approximately 10 points on both LLaMA2-7B and Qwen1.5-7B in accuracy retention at comparable token sparsity levels.
Optimized Quran Passage Retrieval Using an Expanded QA Dataset and Fine-Tuned Language Models
Authors: Mohamed Basem, Islam Oshallah, Baraa Hikal, Ali Hamdi, Ammar Mohamed
Date: 2024-12-16 00:00:00
Tasks: Passage Retrieval, Retrieval

Understanding the deep meanings of the Qur'an and bridging the language gap between modern standard Arabic and classical Arabic is essential to improve the question-and-answer system for the Holy Qur'an. The Qur'an QA 2023 shared task dataset had a limited number of questions with weak model retrieval. To address this challenge, this work updated the original dataset and improved the model accuracy. The original dataset, which contains 251 questions, was reviewed and expanded to 629 questions with question diversification and reformulation, leading to a comprehensive set of 1895 categorized into single-answer, multi-answer, and zero-answer types. Extensive experiments fine-tuned transformer models, including AraBERT, RoBERTa, CAMeLBERT, AraELECTRA, and BERT. The best model, AraBERT-base, achieved a MAP@10 of 0.36 and MRR of 0.59, representing improvements of 63% and 59%, respectively, compared to the baseline scores (MAP@10: 0.22, MRR: 0.37). Additionally, the dataset expansion led to improvements in handling "no answer" cases, with the proposed approach achieving a 75% success rate for such instances, compared to the baseline's 25%. These results demonstrate the effect of dataset improvement and model architecture optimization in increasing the performance of QA systems for the Holy Qur'an, with higher accuracy, recall, and precision.
ConceptEdit: Conceptualization-Augmented Knowledge Editing in Large Language Models for Commonsense Reasoning
Authors: Liyu Zhang, Weiqi Wang, Tianqing Fang, Yangqiu Song
Date: 2024-12-16 00:00:00
Tasks: knowledge editing, Question Answering

Knowledge Editing (KE) aims to adjust a Large Language Model's (LLM) internal representations and parameters to correct inaccuracies and improve output consistency without incurring the computational expense of re-training the entire model. However, editing commonsense knowledge still faces difficulties, including limited knowledge coverage in existing resources, the infeasibility of annotating labels for an overabundance of commonsense knowledge, and the strict knowledge formats of current editing methods. In this paper, we address these challenges by presenting ConceptEdit, a framework that integrates conceptualization and instantiation into the KE pipeline for LLMs to enhance their commonsense reasoning capabilities. ConceptEdit dynamically diagnoses implausible commonsense knowledge within an LLM using another verifier LLM and augments the source knowledge to be edited with conceptualization for stronger generalizability. Experimental results demonstrate that LLMs enhanced with ConceptEdit successfully generate commonsense knowledge with improved plausibility compared to other baselines and achieve stronger performance across multiple question answering benchmarks.
INTERACT: Enabling Interactive, Question-Driven Learning in Large Language Models
Authors: Aum Kendapadi, Kerem Zaman, Rakesh R. Menon, Shashank Srivastava
Date: 2024-12-16 00:00:00
Tasks: Articles

Large language models (LLMs) excel at answering questions but remain passive learners--absorbing static data without the ability to question and refine knowledge. This paper explores how LLMs can transition to interactive, question-driven learning through student-teacher dialogues. We introduce INTERACT (INTEReractive Learning for Adaptive Concept Transfer), a framework in which a "student" LLM engages a "teacher" LLM through iterative inquiries to acquire knowledge across 1,347 contexts, including song lyrics, news articles, movie plots, academic papers, and images. Our experiments show that across a wide range of scenarios and LLM architectures, interactive learning consistently enhances performance, achieving up to a 25% improvement, with 'cold-start' student models matching static learning baselines in as few as five dialogue turns. Interactive setups can also mitigate the disadvantages of weaker teachers, showcasing the robustness of question-driven learning.
RoLargeSum: A Large Dialect-Aware Romanian News Dataset for Summary, Headline, and Keyword Generation
Authors: Andrei-Marius Avram, Mircea Timpuriu, Andreea Iuga, Vlad-Cristian Matei, Iulian-Marius Tăiatu, Tudor Găină, Dumitru-Clementin Cercel, Florin Pop, Mihaela-Claudia Cercel
Date: 2024-12-15 00:00:00
Tasks: Articles, Benchmarking

Using supervised automatic summarisation methods requires sufficient corpora that include pairs of documents and their summaries. Similarly to many tasks in natural language processing, most of the datasets available for summarization are in English, posing challenges for developing summarization models in other languages. Thus, in this work, we introduce RoLargeSum, a novel large-scale summarization dataset for the Romanian language crawled from various publicly available news websites from Romania and the Republic of Moldova that were thoroughly cleaned to ensure a high-quality standard. RoLargeSum contains more than 615K news articles, together with their summaries, as well as their headlines, keywords, dialect, and other metadata that we found on the targeted websites. We further evaluated the performance of several BART variants and open-source large language models on RoLargeSum for benchmarking purposes. We manually evaluated the results of the best-performing system to gain insight into the potential pitfalls of this data set and future development.
Reliable, Reproducible, and Really Fast Leaderboards with Evalica
Authors: Dmitry Ustalov
Date: 2024-12-15 00:00:00

The rapid advancement of natural language processing (NLP) technologies, such as instruction-tuned large language models (LLMs), urges the development of modern evaluation protocols with human and machine feedback. We introduce Evalica, an open-source toolkit that facilitates the creation of reliable and reproducible model leaderboards. This paper presents its design, evaluates its performance, and demonstrates its usability through its Web interface, command-line interface, and Python API.
CATER: Leveraging LLM to Pioneer a Multidimensional, Reference-Independent Paradigm in Translation Quality Evaluation
Authors: Kurando IIDA, Kenjiro MIMURA
Date: 2024-12-15 00:00:00
Tasks: Machine Translation, Translation

This paper introduces the Comprehensive AI-assisted Translation Edit Ratio (CATER), a novel and fully prompt-driven framework for evaluating machine translation (MT) quality. Leveraging large language models (LLMs) via a carefully designed prompt-based protocol, CATER expands beyond traditional reference-bound metrics, offering a multidimensional, reference-independent evaluation that addresses linguistic accuracy, semantic fidelity, contextual coherence, stylistic appropriateness, and information completeness. CATER's unique advantage lies in its immediate implementability: by providing the source and target texts along with a standardized prompt, an LLM can rapidly identify errors, quantify edit effort, and produce category-level and overall scores. This approach eliminates the need for pre-computed references or domain-specific resources, enabling instant adaptation to diverse languages, genres, and user priorities through adjustable weights and prompt modifications. CATER's LLM-enabled strategy supports more nuanced assessments, capturing phenomena such as subtle omissions, hallucinations, and discourse-level shifts that increasingly challenge contemporary MT systems. By uniting the conceptual rigor of frameworks like MQM and DQF with the scalability and flexibility of LLM-based evaluation, CATER emerges as a valuable tool for researchers, developers, and professional translators worldwide. The framework and example prompts are openly available, encouraging community-driven refinement and further empirical validation.
Beyond Discrete Personas: Personality Modeling Through Journal Intensive Conversations
Authors: Sayantan Pal, Souvik Das, Rohini K. Srihari
Date: 2024-12-15 00:00:00

Large Language Models (LLMs) have significantly improved personalized conversational capabilities. However, existing datasets like Persona Chat, Synthetic Persona Chat, and Blended Skill Talk rely on static, predefined personas. This approach often results in dialogues that fail to capture human personalities' fluid and evolving nature. To overcome these limitations, we introduce a novel dataset with around 400,000 dialogues and a framework for generating personalized conversations using long-form journal entries from Reddit. Our approach clusters journal entries for each author and filters them by selecting the most representative cluster, ensuring that the retained entries best reflect the author's personality. We further refine the data by capturing the Big Five personality traits --openness, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness, and neuroticism --ensuring that dialogues authentically reflect an individual's personality. Using Llama 3 70B, we generate high-quality, personality-rich dialogues grounded in these journal entries. Fine-tuning models on this dataset leads to an 11% improvement in capturing personality traits on average, outperforming existing approaches in generating more coherent and personality-driven dialogues.
Smaller Language Models Are Better Instruction Evolvers
Authors: Tingfeng Hui, Lulu Zhao, Guanting Dong, Yaqi Zhang, Hua Zhou, Sen Su
Date: 2024-12-15 00:00:00

Instruction tuning has been widely used to unleash the complete potential of large language models. Notably, complex and diverse instructions are of significant importance as they can effectively align models with various downstream tasks. However, current approaches to constructing large-scale instructions predominantly favour powerful models such as GPT-4 or those with over 70 billion parameters, under the empirical presumption that such larger language models (LLMs) inherently possess enhanced capabilities. In this study, we question this prevalent assumption and conduct an in-depth exploration into the potential of smaller language models (SLMs) in the context of instruction evolution. Extensive experiments across three scenarios of instruction evolution reveal that smaller language models (SLMs) can synthesize more effective instructions than LLMs. Further analysis demonstrates that SLMs possess a broader output space during instruction evolution, resulting in more complex and diverse variants. We also observe that the existing metrics fail to focus on the impact of the instructions. Thus, we propose Instruction Complex-Aware IFD (IC-IFD), which introduces instruction complexity in the original IFD score to evaluate the effectiveness of instruction data more accurately. Our source code is available at: \href{https://github.com/HypherX/Evolution-Analysis}{https://github.com/HypherX/Evolution-Analysis}