pwc-archive/papers-with-abstracts huggingface dataset:
Superintelligence Strategy: Expert Version
Authors: Dan Hendrycks, Eric Schmidt, Alexandr Wang
Date: 2025-03-07 00:00:00
Tasks: Navigate

Rapid advances in AI are beginning to reshape national security. Destabilizing AI developments could rupture the balance of power and raise the odds of great-power conflict, while widespread proliferation of capable AI hackers and virologists would lower barriers for rogue actors to cause catastrophe. Superintelligence -- AI vastly better than humans at nearly all cognitive tasks -- is now anticipated by AI researchers. Just as nations once developed nuclear strategies to secure their survival, we now need a coherent superintelligence strategy to navigate a new period of transformative change. We introduce the concept of Mutual Assured AI Malfunction (MAIM): a deterrence regime resembling nuclear mutual assured destruction (MAD) where any state's aggressive bid for unilateral AI dominance is met with preventive sabotage by rivals. Given the relative ease of sabotaging a destabilizing AI project -- through interventions ranging from covert cyberattacks to potential kinetic strikes on datacenters -- MAIM already describes the strategic picture AI superpowers find themselves in. Alongside this, states can increase their competitiveness by bolstering their economies and militaries through AI, and they can engage in nonproliferation to rogue actors to keep weaponizable AI capabilities out of their hands. Taken together, the three-part framework of deterrence, nonproliferation, and competitiveness outlines a robust strategy to superintelligence in the years ahead.
SYMBIOSIS: Systems Thinking and Machine Intelligence for Better Outcomes in Society
Authors: Sameer Sethi, Donald Martin Jr., Emmanuel Klu
Date: 2025-03-07 00:00:00

This paper presents SYMBIOSIS, an AI-powered framework and platform designed to make Systems Thinking accessible for addressing societal challenges and unlock paths for leveraging systems thinking frameworks to improve AI systems. The platform establishes a centralized, open-source repository of systems thinking/system dynamics models categorized by Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and societal topics using topic modeling and classification techniques. Systems Thinking resources, though critical for articulating causal theories in complex problem spaces, are often locked behind specialized tools and intricate notations, creating high barriers to entry. To address this, we developed a generative co-pilot that translates complex systems representations - such as causal loop and stock-flow diagrams - into natural language (and vice-versa), allowing users to explore and build models without extensive technical training. Rooted in community-based system dynamics (CBSD) and informed by community-driven insights on societal context, we aim to bridge the problem understanding chasm. This gap, driven by epistemic uncertainty, often limits ML developers who lack the community-specific knowledge essential for problem understanding and formulation, often leading to ill informed causal assumptions, reduced intervention effectiveness and harmful biases. Recent research identifies causal and abductive reasoning as crucial frontiers for AI, and Systems Thinking provides a naturally compatible framework for both. By making Systems Thinking frameworks more accessible and user-friendly, SYMBIOSIS aims to serve as a foundational step to unlock future research into responsible and society-centered AI. Our work underscores the need for ongoing research into AI's capacity to understand essential characteristics of complex adaptive systems paving the way for more socially attuned, effective AI systems.
Compliance of AI Systems
Authors: Julius Schöning, Niklas Kruse
Date: 2025-03-07 00:00:00

The increasing integration of artificial intelligence (AI) systems in various fields requires solid concepts to ensure compliance with upcoming legislation. This paper systematically examines the compliance of AI systems with relevant legislation, focusing on the EU's AI Act and the compliance of data sets. The analysis highlighted many challenges associated with edge devices, which are increasingly being used to deploy AI applications closer and closer to the data sources. Such devices often face unique issues due to their decentralized nature and limited computing resources for implementing sophisticated compliance mechanisms. By analyzing AI implementations, the paper identifies challenges and proposes the first best practices for legal compliance when developing, deploying, and running AI. The importance of data set compliance is highlighted as a cornerstone for ensuring the trustworthiness, transparency, and explainability of AI systems, which must be aligned with ethical standards set forth in regulatory frameworks such as the AI Act. The insights gained should contribute to the ongoing discourse on the responsible development and deployment of embedded AI systems.
Evaluating open-source Large Language Models for automated fact-checking
Authors: Nicolo' Fontana, Francesco Corso, Enrico Zuccolotto, Francesco Pierri
Date: 2025-03-07 00:00:00
Tasks: Fact Checking, Misinformation

The increasing prevalence of online misinformation has heightened the demand for automated fact-checking solutions. Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as potential tools for assisting in this task, but their effectiveness remains uncertain. This study evaluates the fact-checking capabilities of various open-source LLMs, focusing on their ability to assess claims with different levels of contextual information. We conduct three key experiments: (1) evaluating whether LLMs can identify the semantic relationship between a claim and a fact-checking article, (2) assessing models' accuracy in verifying claims when given a related fact-checking article, and (3) testing LLMs' fact-checking abilities when leveraging data from external knowledge sources such as Google and Wikipedia. Our results indicate that LLMs perform well in identifying claim-article connections and verifying fact-checked stories but struggle with confirming factual news, where they are outperformed by traditional fine-tuned models such as RoBERTa. Additionally, the introduction of external knowledge does not significantly enhance LLMs' performance, calling for more tailored approaches. Our findings highlight both the potential and limitations of LLMs in automated fact-checking, emphasizing the need for further refinements before they can reliably replace human fact-checkers.
Cognitive Bias Detection Using Advanced Prompt Engineering
Authors: Frederic Lemieux, Aisha Behr, Clara Kellermann-Bryant, Zaki Mohammed
Date: 2025-03-07 00:00:00
Tasks: Bias Detection, Decision Making, Prompt Engineering

Cognitive biases, systematic deviations from rationality in judgment, pose significant challenges in generating objective content. This paper introduces a novel approach for real-time cognitive bias detection in user-generated text using large language models (LLMs) and advanced prompt engineering techniques. The proposed system analyzes textual data to identify common cognitive biases such as confirmation bias, circular reasoning, and hidden assumption. By designing tailored prompts, the system effectively leverages LLMs' capabilities to both recognize and mitigate these biases, improving the quality of human-generated content (e.g., news, media, reports). Experimental results demonstrate the high accuracy of our approach in identifying cognitive biases, offering a valuable tool for enhancing content objectivity and reducing the risks of biased decision-making.
Automatic Teaching Platform on Vision Language Retrieval Augmented Generation
Authors: Ruslan Gokhman, Jialu Li, Youshan Zhang
Date: 2025-03-07 00:00:00
Tasks: RAG, Retrieval, Retrieval-augmented Generation

Automating teaching presents unique challenges, as replicating human interaction and adaptability is complex. Automated systems cannot often provide nuanced, real-time feedback that aligns with students' individual learning paces or comprehension levels, which can hinder effective support for diverse needs. This is especially challenging in fields where abstract concepts require adaptive explanations. In this paper, we propose a vision language retrieval augmented generation (named VL-RAG) system that has the potential to bridge this gap by delivering contextually relevant, visually enriched responses that can enhance comprehension. By leveraging a database of tailored answers and images, the VL-RAG system can dynamically retrieve information aligned with specific questions, creating a more interactive and engaging experience that fosters deeper understanding and active student participation. It allows students to explore concepts visually and verbally, promoting deeper understanding and reducing the need for constant human oversight while maintaining flexibility to expand across different subjects and course material.
Quantifying the Relevance of Youth Research Cited in the US Policy Documents
Authors: Miftahul Jannat Mokarrama, Hamed Alhoori
Date: 2025-03-06 00:00:00
Tasks: Articles

In recent years, there has been a growing concern and emphasis on conducting research beyond academic or scientific research communities, benefiting society at large. A well-known approach to measuring the impact of research on society is enumerating its policy citation(s). Despite the importance of research in informing policy, there is no concrete evidence to suggest the research's relevance in cited policy documents. This is concerning because it may increase the possibility of evidence used in policy being manipulated by individual, social, or political biases that may lead to inappropriate, fragmented, or archaic research evidence in policy. Therefore, it is crucial to identify the degree of relevance between research articles and citing policy documents. In this paper, we examined the scale of contextual relevance of youth-focused research in the referenced US policy documents using natural language processing techniques, state-of-the-art pre-trained Large Language Models (LLMs), and statistical analysis. Our experiments and analysis concluded that youth-related research articles that get US policy citations are mostly relevant to the citing policy documents.
Talking Back -- human input and explanations to interactive AI systems
Authors: Alan Dix, Tommaso Turchi, Ben Wilson, Anna Monreale, Matt Roach
Date: 2025-03-06 00:00:00

While XAI focuses on providing AI explanations to humans, can the reverse - humans explaining their judgments to AI - foster richer, synergistic human-AI systems? This paper explores various forms of human inputs to AI and examines how human explanations can guide machine learning models toward automated judgments and explanations that align more closely with human concepts.
On Fact and Frequency: LLM Responses to Misinformation Expressed with Uncertainty
Authors: Yana van de Sande, Gunes Açar, Thabo van Woudenberg, Martha Larson
Date: 2025-03-06 00:00:00
Tasks: Misinformation

We study LLM judgments of misinformation expressed with uncertainty. Our experiments study the response of three widely used LLMs (GPT-4o, LlaMA3, DeepSeek-v2) to misinformation propositions that have been verified false and then are transformed into uncertain statements according to an uncertainty typology. Our results show that after transformation, LLMs change their factchecking classification from false to not-false in 25% of the cases. Analysis reveals that the change cannot be explained by predictors to which humans are expected to be sensitive, i.e., modality, linguistic cues, or argumentation strategy. The exception is doxastic transformations, which use linguistic cue phrases such as "It is believed ...".To gain further insight, we prompt the LLM to make another judgment about the transformed misinformation statements that is not related to truth value. Specifically, we study LLM estimates of the frequency with which people make the uncertain statement. We find a small but significant correlation between judgment of fact and estimation of frequency.
Prompt Programming: A Platform for Dialogue-based Computational Problem Solving with Generative AI Models
Authors: Victor-Alexandru Pădurean, Paul Denny, Alkis Gotovos, Adish Singla
Date: 2025-03-06 00:00:00

Computing students increasingly rely on generative AI tools for programming assistance, often without formal instruction or guidance. This highlights a need to teach students how to effectively interact with AI models, particularly through natural language prompts, to generate and critically evaluate code for solving computational tasks. To address this, we developed a novel platform for prompt programming that enables authentic dialogue-based interactions, supports problems involving multiple interdependent functions, and offers on-request execution of generated code. Data analysis from over 900 students in an introductory programming course revealed high engagement, with the majority of prompts occurring within multi-turn dialogues. Problems with multiple interdependent functions encouraged iterative refinement, with progression graphs highlighting several common strategies. Students were highly selective about the code they chose to test, suggesting that on-request execution of generated code promoted critical thinking. Given the growing importance of learning dialogue-based programming with AI, we provide this tool as a publicly accessible resource, accompanied by a corpus of programming problems for educational use.
Codebook Reduction and Saturation: Novel observations on Inductive Thematic Saturation for Large Language Models and initial coding in Thematic Analysis
Authors: Stefano De Paoli, Walter Stan Mathis
Date: 2025-03-06 00:00:00

This paper reflects on the process of performing Thematic Analysis with Large Language Models (LLMs). Specifically, the paper deals with the problem of analytical saturation of initial codes, as produced by LLMs. Thematic Analysis is a well-established qualitative analysis method composed of interlinked phases. A key phase is the initial coding, where the analysts assign labels to discrete components of a dataset. Saturation is a way to measure the validity of a qualitative analysis and relates to the recurrence and repetition of initial codes. In the paper we reflect on how well LLMs achieve analytical saturation and propose also a novel technique to measure Inductive Thematic Saturation (ITS). This novel technique leverages a programming framework called DSPy. The proposed novel approach allows a precise measurement of ITS.
Uncovering inequalities in new knowledge learning by large language models across different languages
Authors: Chenglong Wang, Haoyu Tang, Xiyuan Yang, Yueqi Xie, Jina Suh, Sunayana Sitaram, Junming Huang, Yu Xie, Zhaoya Gong, Xing Xie, Fangzhao Wu
Date: 2025-03-06 00:00:00
Tasks: In-Context Learning

As large language models (LLMs) gradually become integral tools for problem solving in daily life worldwide, understanding linguistic inequality is becoming increasingly important. Existing research has primarily focused on static analyses that assess the disparities in the existing knowledge and capabilities of LLMs across languages. However, LLMs are continuously evolving, acquiring new knowledge to generate up-to-date, domain-specific responses. Investigating linguistic inequalities within this dynamic process is, therefore, also essential. In this paper, we explore inequalities in new knowledge learning by LLMs across different languages and four key dimensions: effectiveness, transferability, prioritization, and robustness. Through extensive experiments under two settings (in-context learning and fine-tuning) using both proprietary and open-source models, we demonstrate that low-resource languages consistently face disadvantages across all four dimensions. By shedding light on these disparities, we aim to raise awareness of linguistic inequalities in LLMs' new knowledge learning, fostering the development of more inclusive and equitable future LLMs.
AI-Enhanced Deliberative Democracy and the Future of the Collective Will
Authors: Manon Revel, Théophile Pénigaud
Date: 2025-03-06 00:00:00
Tasks: Decision Making

This article unpacks the design choices behind longstanding and newly proposed computational frameworks aimed at finding common grounds across collective preferences and examines their potential future impacts, both technically and normatively. It begins by situating AI-assisted preference elicitation within the historical role of opinion polls, emphasizing that preferences are shaped by the decision-making context and are seldom objectively captured. With that caveat in mind, we explore AI-based democratic innovations as discovery tools for fostering reasonable representations of a collective will, sense-making, and agreement-seeking. At the same time, we caution against dangerously misguided uses, such as enabling binding decisions, fostering gradual disempowerment or post-rationalizing political outcomes.
Enhancing Collective Intelligence in Large Language Models Through Emotional Integration
Authors: Likith Kadiyala, Ramteja Sajja, Yusuf Sermet, Ibrahim Demir
Date: 2025-03-05 00:00:00
Tasks: Decision Making, Diversity

This research investigates the integration of emotional diversity into Large Language Models (LLMs) to enhance collective intelligence. Inspired by the human wisdom of crowds phenomenon, where group decisions often outperform individual judgments, we fine-tuned the DarkIdol-Llama-3.1-8B model using Google's GoEmotions dataset and Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) to simulate emotionally diverse responses. Evaluating the model on a distance estimation task between Fargo, ND, and Seattle, WA, across 15,064 unique persona configurations, we analyzed how emotional states and social attributes influence decision-making. Our findings demonstrate that emotional integration shapes response patterns while maintaining acceptable prediction accuracy, revealing its potential to enhance artificial collective intelligence. This study provides valuable insights into the interplay of emotional diversity and decision-making in LLMs, suggesting pathways for creating emotionally aware AI systems that balance emotional depth with analytical precision.
Dyads: Artist-Centric, AI-Generated Dance Duets
Authors: Zixuan Wang, Luis Zerkowski, Ilya Vidrin, Mariel Pettee
Date: 2025-03-05 00:00:00

Existing AI-generated dance methods primarily train on motion capture data from solo dance performances, but a critical feature of dance in nearly any genre is the interaction of two or more bodies in space. Moreover, many works at the intersection of AI and dance fail to incorporate the ideas and needs of the artists themselves into their development process, yielding models that produce far more useful insights for the AI community than for the dance community. This work addresses both needs of the field by proposing an AI method to model the complex interactions between pairs of dancers and detailing how the technical methodology can be shaped by ongoing co-creation with the artistic stakeholders who curated the movement data. Our model is a probability-and-attention-based Variational Autoencoder that generates a choreographic partner conditioned on an input dance sequence. We construct a custom loss function to enhance the smoothness and coherence of the generated choreography. Our code is open-source, and we also document strategies for other interdisciplinary research teams to facilitate collaboration and strong communication between artists and technologists.
Synthetic Data Augmentation for Enhancing Harmful Algal Bloom Detection with Machine Learning
Authors: Tianyi Huang
Date: 2025-03-05 00:00:00
Tasks: Data Augmentation

Harmful Algal Blooms (HABs) pose severe threats to aquatic ecosystems and public health, resulting in substantial economic losses globally. Early detection is crucial but often hindered by the scarcity of high-quality datasets necessary for training reliable machine learning (ML) models. This study investigates the use of synthetic data augmentation using Gaussian Copulas to enhance ML-based HAB detection systems. Synthetic datasets of varying sizes (100-1,000 samples) were generated using relevant environmental features$\unicode{x2015}$water temperature, salinity, and UVB radiation$\unicode{x2015}$with corrected Chlorophyll-a concentration as the target variable. Experimental results demonstrate that moderate synthetic augmentation significantly improves model performance (RMSE reduced from 0.4706 to 0.1850; $p < 0.001$). However, excessive synthetic data introduces noise and reduces predictive accuracy, emphasizing the need for a balanced approach to data augmentation. These findings highlight the potential of synthetic data to enhance HAB monitoring systems, offering a scalable and cost-effective method for early detection and mitigation of ecological and public health risks.
Introduction to Artificial Consciousness: History, Current Trends and Ethical Challenges
Authors: Aïda Elamrani
Date: 2025-03-05 00:00:00

With the significant progress of artificial intelligence (AI) and consciousness science, artificial consciousness (AC) has recently gained popularity. This work provides a broad overview of the main topics and current trends in AC. The first part traces the history of this interdisciplinary field to establish context and clarify key terminology, including the distinction between Weak and Strong AC. The second part examines major trends in AC implementations, emphasising the synergy between Global Workspace and Attention Schema, as well as the problem of evaluating the internal states of artificial systems. The third part analyses the ethical dimension of AC development, revealing both critical risks and transformative opportunities. The last part offers recommendations to guide AC research responsibly, and outlines the limitations of this study as well as avenues for future research. The main conclusion is that while AC appears both indispensable and inevitable for scientific progress, serious efforts are required to address the far-reaching impact of this innovative research path.
The impact of AI and peer feedback on research writing skills: a study using the CGScholar platform among Kazakhstani scholars
Authors: Raigul Zheldibayeva
Date: 2025-03-05 00:00:00
Tasks: Multiple-choice, Survey

This research studies the impact of AI and peer feedback on the academic writing development of Kazakhstani scholars using the CGScholar platform - a product of research into collaborative learning, big data, and artificial intelligence developed by educators and computer scientists at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (UIUC). The study aimed to find out how familiarity with AI tools and peer feedback processes impacts participants' openness to incorporating feedback into their academic writing. The study involved 36 scholars enrolled in a scientific internship focused on education at UIUC. A survey with 15 multiple-choice questions, a Likert scale, and open-ended questions was used to collect data. The survey was conducted via Google Forms in both English and Russian to ensure linguistic accessibility. Demographic information such as age, gender, and first language was collected to provide a detailed understanding of the data. The analysis revealed a moderate positive correlation between familiarity with AI tools and openness to making changes based on feedback, and a strong positive correlation between research writing experience and expectations of peer feedback, especially in the area of research methodology. These results show that participants are open-minded to AI-assisted feedback; however, they still highly appreciate peer input, especially regarding methodological guidance. This study demonstrates the potential benefits of integrating AI tools with traditional feedback mechanisms to improve research writing quality in academic settings.