"I'm familiar in principal, I don't think you're stupid at all."
was a joke, I promise. Better explained in my last post I think.
.
"I have looked previously at that same or a similar assertion"
This is what I'm talking about:
http://money.cnn.com/2016/10/31/media/donna-brazile-cnn-resignation/
.
All of my assertions are based on my understanding of the "facts" unfortunately none of the media organizations are reliable in this regard. I could very well be arguing based on partisan misinformation under the guise of being "objective". From my perspective the purpose of an investigation is to get to the truth. (legally) This could result in no one being found guilty of anything. (Like Clinton's email probe)
.
Ok, gotta go... for real this time lol.