I had to get some help from people who know logical fallacies much more than I to name your potential fallacy.  The fallacy of the future seems to fit your statement that future Federal courts will explain your point at some later date. Now, to be sure, this is not a fallacy if one can see a logical progression of things. If I see my wooden deck furniture start to decay due to exposure to the elements, I can say that if this continues without intervention, my furniture will likely need replacing. But you are assuming the will of the courts, something much more difficult to predict (though you may feel yourself an expert here). Anyway, I enjoy looking these things up and I'd hope you might think this is a way to keep our arguments free of logical fallacies. I am sure in the future, you will come to my way of seeing it (humor). https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Escape_to_the_future