You do realize that you mentioned "leaving oil in the ground" three times? Your fixated on that one sentence and virtually ignoring the rest of the it. Oh you do talk of running railcars half full and lower speeds, but even that minimal step isn't even on the table for consideration by the powers that be. You can remove Margolis' "leaving oil in the ground" comment all you like and it won't make a hill of beans, few if any of the things he's addressed will be acted on, period, end of sentence. And it has nothing to do with safety vs stopping oil production(hint: it's profits)  but go on believing your fantasy it's that one sentence that's holding up real action on this. Nothing more to add.