On March 1, 2016, Steve Bowers wrote in the RG: "Trump is a nescient nabob preying on a frustrated, angry electorate who feel disenfranchised from the current political system. He represents precisely the attributes he condemns in his rhetoric: morally corrupt, marginally competent individuals who exploit the system for personal gain. Clinton is a duplicitous criminal, promising the moon to an electorate made dependent by the very policies of her party, giving just enough to induce dependence but not enough to pacify, a 1 percenter demanding that the 1 percenters pay their fair share of taxes."
When he writes above: "It takes a paucity of intellectual thought to denigrate someone. Finding fault is far easier than soliciting solutions", who is Bowers referring to?