I do not comment out of context or after reading only a headline, so I know he had a prior conviction.  You seem to have entirely misunderstood the concept that he is not AT THIS TIME guilty of ANY OTHER offense.  It is reasonable to SUSPECT he MAY be guilty of additional charges, but not to ACT on such suspicions BEFORE he is convicted.  I wrote a balanced comment STARTING with lamenting he was not charged with more serious felony charges IF the facts of the later allegations are as ALLEGED (but not yet proven) in the article.  Never confuse one or several allegations with legally established facts.  Note I also advocated taking the time to sort out the matter DURING WHICH the former 'partners' should be separated, either by court order or by jail (if 'danger to others' is established before a Superior Court judge).  The only way I differ from you is that I would do the SAME thing regardless of the sex of the offender - I believe in absolute equality before the law.