con. We will likely never agree on this one.  

 I do find it a bit amusing that you manage to criticize Ms Clinton because she did well in the debate. She was well informed, articulate, poised and very statespersonlike.  Yet, you twist that to be detrimental.  Had she, like Trump, been unprepared, nervous, rude, and ill-at-ease for the entire debate, you would have criticized that.  She did very well, so, instead, you are saying, in essence, "Clinton did badly because she did so well. She had no business being so well prepared.  She had no business being so poised."  

You have really made it clear "she's damned if she does (do well) and damned if she doesn't.

BTW: I rather tire of being dismissed as just "another Democratic Party sheep"; following the Party line.  Such comments trivialize my views and are, to me, insulting.  All my life I've developed and presented MY views and MY opinions....smart...dumb...good....bad? Whatever, but, I've always reached them for myself ..regards, G