I get what you're saying and I certainly don't want to negate the heroic qualities of this man, but I think the Church's reliance upon superstition has worn itself out. Personally I find it very off putting, almost insulting as if in order to believe in the goodness of the man you have to also believe in made-up assertions about his supernatural, intact flesh.

If I am wrong about what the bishop claims to be "true" I am more than happy to recant... however, as I said, without proof it seems nothing more than an appeal to those who tend toward superstition and may leave others feeling ousted. For me it is no different than Marian apparitions... given that neither is on par with an apostolic Rule of Faith, show me proof or I'm not buying it.