Once again a 'study' with no link to the study itself. At least 90% of 'studies' are of poor design and/or data is poorly interpreted etc. A responsible journalist would make it easy for people who want to to check the strengths and weaknesses of the study to find the study. 

This is not a trivial matter. If 'quality' journalists want to have their material to have more impact than fake science they need to act the scientific method matters.