The only problem with your assertion is that your "leader" is anything but.  He's a skirmisher who's  good at anarchistic disruption of established rules and conventions, but he's absolutely incapable of leading anything.  His single successful accomplishment, the Supreme Court appointment, was as much the work of Congress as of the president, and in any event was much less radical than Trump promised.  Right now, he's pretty well irrelevant as far as implementing any coherent agenda.