I'm confused. The article states repeatedly that the Supreme Court case is for juveniles convicted of "non-homicide" offenses, but then the Post's example for this story is Guy Lucero who, according to the Denver Post, was "sentenced to 84 years in prison based on his consecutive penalties for murder and attempted murder." Then the story only mentions attempted murder and not an actual murder conviction. I'm assuming that it's just sloppy reporting and editing, or is the story not presenting all of the facts?