That statement from the Jan 6 is exactly what I mean. "The US Intellegence Community is charged with monitoring and assessing the intentions, capabilities, and actions of foreign actors;"  And in the end, all they could do was give estimates of confidence, which a few times differed between agencies, that somehow pointed to Russia. If there was evidence, Trump would have not been allowed to be President. Obama would not have allowed it. The second statement, "it does not analyze US political processes or US public opinion" is confirmation that the belief that Russia somehow influenced the outcome of the election is just that...US political or US public opinion. No sly form of dishonesty.