What is sad is that you have no understanding of Roe v. Wade.  As I said earlier, that case was not grounded in the Equal Protection Clause.  Now, by apparent inadvertence, you agree, as you say:  "Roe v. Wade grounds constitutional protections for women’s decision wheth­er to end a pregnancy in the Due Process Clauses."  DUE PROCESS, not EQUAL PROTECTION.  

Notably, the rest of your post is taken word for word, and without attribution, from a UCLA law review article.  A cut-and-paste job.  Aside from that, law review articles, unless they are written by top-notch, noted scholars, usually occupy the lowest rung of legal authority.  If there is federal court precedent squarely holding that the right to abortion is grounded in the Equal Protection Clause, please cite it.