Wasn't this one of the "common sense" proposals from the collectivists, insurance to protect the society that was being harmed by "unprecedented and historical" amounts of their illogically termed "gun violence"? And now, when the NRA implements one of their "common sense solutions" and makes it available, they seek to villify their own suggestion by coining the term "murder insurance"?
Perhaps this bait and switch tactic is an example of why no one who owns a firearm has a scintilla of interest in "compromising" further with these irrational individuals?  Just a thought . . .