I am presenting facts, and those facts undercut your argument completely.

If a chemist, or a teacher, or an engineer gets advice from H&R Block..does that make them an H&R Block chemist, teacher, or engineer?  

And if that teacher becomes a principal, and one of her teachers abuses a child does that make H&R block guilty by association? 

That's the watertight reasoning we've learned to love here under your signature.  Nice and tight.