Baloney. The only reason the projected contingency is two billion for a cost of 8.2 billion is that the projected revenue is 10 billion. 

So we more than cover the costs by 2 billion. For the Feds that isn't enough they want an extra billion for a total contingency of 3 billion. 

Anyway the projected revenue is more than enough to pay for rail construction. That's the point.

At FIRST, opponents argued that the monthly revenue would be too low and not cover the projected revenue. But the money is solid financing. We have had all the money come in that is projected. So NOW opponents say that too much money is coming in. Rail will cost too much.