I agree the Tax Foundation does not make a good spokesman for the No on 97 campaign, but they do make a valid point.

This is a tax that is making a pinpoint drone strike on a few large companies. I think that feature is its worst quality and is the main reason I oppose it.

If we have such a big and important problem that it takes $3 billion to solve, shouldn't we all be sharing the burden? If a ballot measure can succeed by demonizing and targeting certain businesses or groups, who is next in the bulls eye?

This is not the way we should be governing ourselves.