"..but failed to see the potential political backlash (e.g. reduced federal funding) and now the reported Social Media boycott Hawaii, which in all likelihood could impact tourism way more than the AG claimed as a reason to challenge the limited and temporary travel order"
So are you saying he should have based his decision of the possibility that Hawaii might lose federal monies and not the US Constitution? 
Many people out there voted Trump and asked that taxes and federal expenses be cut so here it is and you complaining about losing federal monies?..and he should have known that someone was going to do a social media campaign to boycott Hawaii, right?
"The public should be able to question and if necessary challenge their products and motivations."....We do have the right to appeal to a higher court. I trust you know this?