You don't understand how logic and burdens of proof work.

Just because something may *possibly, remotely* be true, does not establish that it is. More importantly, the burden of establishing a claim is on the proponent to prove it, not the other party to disprove it. 

Is it *possible* Trump Tower was wiretapped? Sure. But it's also *possible* the Russians infiltrated the 2016 election to hand Vulgar Talking Yam the presidency.