I think this is substandard journalism.    At a minimum, the language used in journalism should clearly communicate to the common reader.  The phrase "calls out" is not clear.   Perhaps it means "accuses", perhaps, "objects to", perhaps it means "whines about"?    Also, journalism should be about issues of common interest.  Why are the emotional states of random people a matter of common interest?  Why should a general reader care that someone is very angry about Trump being elected.  I am sure people would have been angry if Clinton were elected.  Would there have been stories about how furious someone was that "that woman!" was elected?  If so, I would be "calling out" the "journalist" who filed THAT story.