More important than the ruling's impact on indigenous rights might be its impact on the understanding of religious freedom. Clearly, religious freedom is not a catch-all justification to sustain any practice or belief a person holds to apply. There must be a clear and objective relationship to worship rather than to objects or "spiritual focal point(s)" of worship. As the article states, the SCC has upheld the view that religious rights are not absolute and are not defined merely by the views and perceptions of those who claim such rights to apply, which is a step in the right direction.