A decision of the Supreme Court fashioned a right to privacy out the gossamer of the “penumbra” and sequentially undercut the ground out from under laws against abortion and same sex marriage.

Many citizens, without a scintilla of animus towards LGBT citizens, oppose so-called same sex marriage for a variety of reasons, religious, social, and scientific and continue to oppose it. As your post demonstrates sweet reason will be no more successful impacting this judicial edict than it has been restricting abortion.

The turnaround on this issue thanks to the experience with abortion, and the mood of the country, will be faster and the solution is a constitutional amendment.

“Homophobe”, according to the Oxford dictionary, is a noun, “A person with an extreme and irrational aversion to homosexuality and homosexual people.”

Opposing same sex marriage for good reasons does not make one a homophobe, but accusing someone of it without good reason may tag someone as a heterophobe.