City Park Golf Course definitely needs a new design.  The current layout has par 35-37 and the #10 tee is nearly a quarter mile from the clubhouse.  Unfortunately, the image reprinted with this article and circulating for the past month is not the right functional design for an 18-hole course on this site.   
                 
                 
Why is nobody reacting to the highly inefficient course layout shown in the image of the proposed new design that City Council has now approved?  Where is the concern that golfers are being stuck with a very poor overall course design?