The pages of detailed problems with the translations the CDF used to accompany the two rejections belie your proposition.

The ICEL had its own agenda and the English-speaking bishops had to go as penitents to get slight "favors" from it. It had arranged its own income source - the royalties off ICEL texts - so it could operate without supervision.

In the US a handful of bishops, like Trautmann in Erie, blocked their fellow bishops from sending complaints directly to the ICEL.

The lack of correspondence between the content of the Latin originals of the Missal and Psalter ultimately made a CDF clampdown mandatory.

It amazes me that anyone misses the puerile, clumsy, ungraceful, dumbed-down ICEL texts.