Continued from Part 1

These are just two examples along with their continued fixation to build trails within the Front Country without consideration for human/bear conflicts (which we had in 2016 - where the NPS response was highly suspect). 

One shouldn't have to question NPS but in Denali's case I do, due to their past & current history. The question is: is it better to starve NPS of funding within Denali to better protect Denali from NPS & their continued desire to domesticate, partition, & degrade the park? 

It used to be that Denali was considered a Wilderness Park & that we (meaning the entire Denali community) took great pride in that; unfortunately & apparently, NPS no longer shares in that view.