I agree with Mr Moreno, but this also goes way beyond student over-sensitivity. There is something deeply creepy about this "team" process. One wonders whether the team members are familiar with such teams and such processes in, say, Russia under Stalin, or in China during the cultural revolution, or in Germany under Hitler. If they are, it's hard to imagine their agreeing to sit on such a "team" and to engage in the implicit intimidation and threat involved. This kind of intimidation often wears an informal bureaucratic face. That's part of what makes it so unsettling. One never knows exactly where one stands

The mere existence of such a "team" makes people less likely to question what few question, more likely just to say what everyone says.