This is an emotionally charged issue so it is easy to take what appears to be the moral high ground and weigh this on the charge that these are heinous criminals who deserve no rights because the crime involves children. But there is no differentiation in the label and on that grounds it needs to be revisited.  Also, why is there not a "convicted murderer" registry - or a "home invaders" registry.  If I have an accountant, or deal with a bank, should I not be able to access a registry of those who are convicted embezzlers?   Anyone who challenges the fairness of this law puts themselves up as a target of "moral outrage" and judgment that they are a supporter of pedophiles and rapists.  American is now a country in love with judgment, as long as it is happening to someone else.