Mr. Pitts has, in my opinion, misapplied a viable concept.  When "unbiased" is defined as giving equal coverage to falsehood and truth, objectivity itself has at least been violated, if not outright obviated and rendered meaningless.  And for the sake of illusory "partisanship" to advocate for Clinton as if she were any less a nightmare than Trump is to perpetrate a similar crime against truth by elevating party politics over reality.  Sad to say I'm pretty sure Mr. Pitts knows better.  We've just been shown the depths of our powerlessness.  No point in continuing to pretend that either of the evils our rulers proffered was the lesser.