There's nothing Substantive in your argument to address. Currently Peruta is awaiting rehearing before the 9th en banc, thus also Richards and Prieto. As it stands, carry is a right in the 9th, if suspended pending. At any rate, try answering my central challenge to your primary claim. If the law has not been enforced, nor even really acknowledged, by state and local LEO, much less Fed, for the past 12 yrs, and hasn't resulted in local/state conflict in that time in Anchorage nor AK, on what rational basis do you claim it will suddenly be an issue if the same situation extends to the UAA campus? Your specious legal theory fails in any analysis of actual practice, both here and everywhere else, ie the majority of states, where permitless carry, both concealed and open, has existed since long before the GFSZA passed.

Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof, and maybe some legal citations, you've yet to produce either, Captain "Appeal to claimed Authority."