Are you trying to equate funds received from the gun lobby with funds received from the gun control lobby?  On the one side, we have groups that encourage the proliferation of a product whose primary purpose is to kill people and are being used more and more often.  On the other side, we have groups that wants to set some limits on that proliferation so that people, when feeling small or insecure or angry, can't just reach for the gun to waste their feelings on innocent bystanders.  You see a moral equivalence between the two?