You are the vice-chair of the NPCA, am I right? If you are, are you writing here on behalf of the NPCA? Who was the ecologist you walked with? The MNRF deems 235 acres to be PSWs. You think that there is only less than 2 acres of land that is ecologically significant? With other words, the MNRF does not tell the truth? 

Have you seen the scathing re-evaluation of the EIS that was done on behalf of the developer? This re-evaluation made it very clear that the EIS was written to favor the position of the developer.