Not surprising.  An offense which can literally only affect men was not only struck down but struck down without a hearing.

Meanwhile, I would bet that if the situation were reversed and a man lied about wearing a condom (let's assume he was a virgin and/or had recent testing to prove he was disease free) he would not only be found guilty of multiple criminal charges but that it would be all over the news before it ever saw a day in court (as opposed to the quiet whimper after a failed appeal like this case).

What's that line from Animal Farm?  "All animals are equal but some animals are more equal than others".