When you get done beating the strawman and fishing with red herrings we can have a real discussion.   (Google those two argumentation fallacies and learn something).   

The tax proposed is illegal under state law so the courts will strike it down.   There is no argument made one way or the other about 'cutting taxes'.  There is an argument made about getting better results on less money which is also known as being more efficient with the money used.   There is an implied argument that additional money doesn't continue to generate results with the same efficiency as current funding does.   That's also known as spending more does not necessarily improve the product (education in this case).   Come back with some numbers on what is a good amount to spend on education with some actual support and we can discuss your numbers.