Wrong again.  The point was if you only apply your "taint" to those with whom you disagree, then criminal background wasn't relevant to same--only your "political" agreement or lack thereof.  You first denied "interest" in applying your "taint" criterion to Frumpy the KKKlown, then changed your position when I called you on it.  Therein lies your concession.

Alas, we have arrived at the inevitable point in our exchange where I must heed the wisdom of the first Holy Imam 'Ali ibn Abu Talib (alayhimus-Salaam): When I debate a reasonable man, I win.  When I debate a fool, I lose."

My turn to concede.  I've lost this debate.  Savor your "victory", such as it is...