Thanks for the translation of the acronym, Nigel.

If you don't read a post, then how can you respond to it?  For example,  I stated that US bombing caused NK to hate the US;  then you went on to say that I didn't understand that US bombing caused NK to hate the US, apparently because you did not bother to read my post before critiquing it.

You are wrong about Kim's accelerating WMD/missile program.  It speeded up under Obama's do nothing strategy.

Try reading the articles suggested.

Iraq was invaded in 2003, not 2010.

There are no good options with respect to a lunatic fascist, Kim, who has WMDs and missiles.

SK & Japan can defend themselves well with ABM systems; NK artillery can be neutralized.

A nuke in a container (which can be defended) is better than 200 NK ICBMs and NK transferring WMDs to Syria & Iran.

Getting rid of the crazy, fascist tyrant, Kim, is the least bad option.  The RoK, Japan, Australia, and perhaps even the PRC will assist.  Kim is an unacceptable threat.