Well, I'm not trying to say that - I'm trying to ask what other reason besides tax avoidance is there to give Justice the shares.  I don't understand the asset freeze strategy.

I'm sure you know small business owners who use income sprinkling to reduce taxes - in this example if Justice were a minor and had no other income I believe he could receive $25-30K annually tax free if distributed as a dividend to him. I think that's an example of the money that the Fair Tax plan is trying to tax. 

I appreciate the response - I was going to make a comment suggesting you read the pdf but I see you co-wrote it :).