I do think there is something strange about our system. If someone has money, perhaps through a lifetime of saving, hard work, studying late into the night at university, foregoing expensive vacations or expensive cars and all that, why should they not have the right to pay for some type of superior (perhaps one might say "more expedient") health care? Why should it be "illegal" to provide it to them or take their money? It would seem to be a rights issue -- rights being, the protection of individuals from the whims of government, which seems to be the case here.