Thanks again for the chuckles.  You are certainly entitled to your opinion, as clearly evidenced by your numerous, much disagreed posts.  You make wild claims while being utterly unable or at least unwilling to explain how you arrived at your conclusions.  For example, the $2 billion in extra expenses you attribute to the federal and state lawsuits despite your heroes at HART saying it cost them ~$46 million total (see Professor Roth's posts).  Your opinion would be more convincing if you could explain how you arrived at such a figure, but you can't, can you?

Unfortunately for you, the only opinions that counted in Ms. Kaleikini's suit were those of the Hawaii Supreme Court Justices, and they were in unanimous agreement that rail broke state law by not completing the archaeological survey for the entire route before beginning construction.