Yes, I understand the premise but if the law is written so the average man can understand it, as it is required to do otherwise it is void for vagueness and a nullity. Then why do we allow judges to insert their own definitions thereby changing the intent of the law and thereby creating new law? A "case law" which was not created by congress therefore unconstitutional in my mind. The intent of our forefathers was for every man to be able to bring his or her grievances to a jury of his peers and both the law and the facts be judged. A judge should be a referee not an active part in the contest.