A DREAM act to cover illegals brought as children is fine, as long as there is a specific  provision those covered can not sponsor family members.  Those who put them in the situation should not benefit from the country's generosity in giving their child amnesty.  I think that's a reasonable trade-off and hopefully will serve as a deterrent to those who might in the future try the same thing.

"Giving the complainers what they've been asking" - yeah, I think that's a problem.  I'm tired of being lectured by lawbreakers as to how we should run our country.