So you endorse natural law as set out by Locke?  Are you saying Aquinas disagreed with Locke?  Are you suggesting Locke was a continuation of Aquinas on the concept of natural law.  Do you deny Locke's conclusions regarding the basis of Society?  You always claim to be willing to discuss idears and things, but when faced with questions about your positions, you inevitably lash out with nastiness and snark.  Is this what you learn from reading Aquinas?  You can hardly demand to be left alone after beginning a discussion, merely because your position proves to be untenable...sigh...