"Gotcha. Right wing funding bad, left wing funding good lol."
You missed the point. 
Right wing funding is bad when it is labelled "non partisan"  to mislead the viewer or reader into thinking the writer has no agenda, as done in the video. The Fraser Institute being called "no-partisan" in the video is a blatant misrepresentation.
The left-wing writer here openly identifies her association with the PET foundation, allowing the reader to take that into consideration any bias that may imply.
So it could rephrased as:
Right wing deception bad,  left wing transparency good. LOL.