Some of these measures are not bad IF they are reciprocol and consistent across the agreement. And if the US drops it's subsidies to farmers or we can tariff to the extent of their subsidies, then it is hard to argue with dropping marketing boards. On huge problem, the effective subsidy given to US aircraft and defense firms via all that military spending they do and the way they dictate interoperability. The question is, does Trump want fair trade or just US dominance at the expense of fairness? Odds are the latter, but if he can be convinced of the former, a reasonable negotiated agreement is possible under these parameters.