I am guessing you didn't read what he said? 
Something you might also find interesting (given your views) is that a "not guilty" verdict in a criminal trial does not mean that the accused is innocent. The judge could be of the opinion that the accused committed the crime, but not beyond reasonable doubt. So in the JZ rape case, JZ was "not guilty" because it could not be proven beyond any reasonable doubt. The man most probably is a rapist.