No.  This has not come to the Vatican for the first time.  This man was brought to the vatican by the pope when serious accusations had been already floated and an investigation had not cleared him..the retired judge could not reach a conclusion but he was not cleared.  it was well known how he treated with great cruelty the victims and families of abusers.  There was a huge uproar in Australia when he was brought to rome and questions as to why someone, with credentials surely, but not in bank fraud as far as I know, was brought there.  Was it to avoid the australian courts?  I do not know but this has always stunk to high heaven and we are ..and especially australian survivors are..owed explanations.  The pope should accompany him to australia, along with whatever medical teams they would like to assemble, along with whatever confessors they would like to assemble.  they should pack now and take a slow boat.