No, you look it up. 
We have lots of rights that "can not [sic]  exist without infringing on the rights of others" unconstitutional scholar and sentence-murderer."  The Constitution - and case law that arises out of Constitutional disputes - constantly juggle our rights.  for example, the rights of the whole over an individual.  As in the NSA being allowed to invade the rights of American citizens in order to (supposedly) protect the nation as a whole.

And a serial killer might define his right to the pursuit of happiness to include the unfettered ability to murder at will. But that infringes on his victims right to life. See how that works, DA?