Paul Hoobyar notes the hypocrisy of many of those who attacked President Clinton for his infidelity and attempts to deny such action.  Certainly President Clinton's actions were immoral and tacky.  However, if all immoral and tacky players on the Washington stage were "sent packing" the city would be a ghost town.  Those who attacked him, did so, not out of moral outrage, but out of political expediency........those attacks were an effort to destroy his presidential effectiveness.......and, yes, they worked pretty well.  

Attacks on Ms Clinton have little to do with concerns over "national security" and everything to do with attempting to destroy her credibility as a Presidential candidate.  We'll see how effective those attacks are as the Presidential campaign progresses.  If Ms Clinton and Mr. Trump are the candidates, the 2016 election is guaranteed to be the nastiest campaign in our history.