Some posters have hypothesized that a 5-1 win should count for more than a 2-1 SO win and the logic is so apparent when presented that any pushback is non sensical.

So apparently a 4 goal margin is the cutoff for when 3 pts should be allocated for a win.  But then the poster proceeds to give an analysis of the impact on team points for a 3 pt win regardless of whether a 4 goal margin had been realized.  Of course, that logic does not make sense but hey, the logic is so apparent that any pushback is non sensical.  Perhaps the poster is using Trump logic and analysis.

To date, there have been roughly 10% of games decided by 4 goals or more.  Hardly a massive issue that should warrant a rules change but apparently rules are changed with such dizzying regularity that this is another example of a need for a rule change.

Makes total sense to who again?  Right.

There may be an argument for a 3pt win but this poster has not shown any semblance of a rational argument for such.