The favortism and bias towards Ganot is misplaced. SA said when lobbying to fire Nash that he should be fired for losing, even though Nash was a good man:
  "With the athletic department already cash-strapped, the obvious question from Hinshaw and Greenwood to Donovan is, "How can you afford to do it?"
   DONOVAN'S ANSWER is a simple question. "How can we afford NOT to do it?
   If UH were to keep Nash on, attendance revenue would not get better. It would get worse." So for Nash, losing and revenue were good reasons to fire him but not for Ganot.
"If he's done, as most of us expect, I'll miss Bob Nash the man and the legend. I won't miss the college head coach" And for Nash, his character wasn't important to being a head coach.