From a  poster:
"For a contributor to scream to stick with the plan, the re-build, and to rightly, given that view, question the Boyle trade, for that poster to then turn around and attack someone who essentially agreed with him that the trade was questionable at best, I don't get it."
"Said poster then goes nuts pointing out how this trade makes sense, at least according to others."

Apparently, this post "goes nuts" and is the "attack": 
"A poster on this thread was "trying to find someone who can explain how trading a 2nd rounder and a prospect for an aging slow footed 4th liner fits into this so-called plan...". Last week, the Hockey News outlined exactly the rationale for this trade. (I guess the poster does not read the Hockey News). Although the asking price for Boyle was projected to be a 1st round pick.
http://thehockeywriters.com/maple-leafs-should-target-brian-boyle/"

Wonder how Brian Boyle feels about being called an "aging slow footed 4th liner"....speaking of attacks.