USDA's CBAs provide services such as farm loans and conservation assistance along with rural and economic development help. Under the E- File Act, these agencies were required to establish an electronic filing and retrieval system enabling farmers and other agricultural producers to access departmental forms, such as farm loan applications, via the Internet by December 18, 2000. Along with the December 18 deadline for establishing the forms-retrieval system, the Secretary of Agriculture was also to report to Congress by that date on progress made in implementing the act. The law further mandated that by June 20, 2002, agricultural producers be able to file paperwork electronically with USDA if they choose to do so. RMA administers the federal crop insurance program, which helps protect producers against losses due to drought, flooding, and other unavoidable causes. By December 1, 2000, it was to submit to Congress a plan for enabling producers to obtain forms and information, such as crop insurance applications and production and yield reports, over the Internet. Implementation of the plan is to be completed by December 1, 2001. In addition to addressing the mandates of the Freedom to E-File Act, USDA is--like other agencies--preparing to implement plans in accordance with the GPEA. To develop and implement USDA's e-file capabilities, on August 30, 2000, the Secretary of Agriculture issued a memorandum to the undersecretaries of the affected agencies and assigned them and mission area leaders with collective responsibility. The Secretary's memorandum also required that one shared plan be developed and implemented to meet E-File Act requirements. The Secretary gave the Office of Chief Information Officer (OCIO) the role of coordinating and facilitating e-file implementation planning and required that the plan be submitted to OCIO no later than September 30, 2000. In response to the Secretary's directive, the undersecretaries transmitted a "Mission Area Report on Freedom to E-File Legislation" to OCIO on October 17, 2000. While providing general information, it lacked specifics on activities and milestones, dependencies among USDA activities, and needed resources. It also did not assign a senior-level official with overall accountability for managing and ensuring the implementing disparate e-file activities. To address their e-file requirements, the CBAs had two separate interagency teams working together to meet the act's December 18, 2000, deadline--one consolidating and developing electronic forms and the other building a technical infrastructure for expanding Internet use. For example, the CBAs purchased an on-line common forms software tool for creating electronic forms, selected forms to post on the Web, and designed and begun implementing a common Internet Web site. At the time of our November briefing, the CBAs still needed to obtain OMB approval for each electronic form, complete testing of the Web page, train county-based field staff in the new e-file procedures, publicize the department's e-file services, and notify the public on how to use them. The CBAs progress in meeting the E-File Act's December 18 deadline was discussed in a report to Congress signed by the Secretary of Agriculture on December 22, 2000. Our review found that, by the December 18 deadline, the CBAs had successfully established a common Internet Web site, obtained OMB approval for 52 FSA and NRCS forms, and placed them on the Internet. However, none of the 100-plus RD forms that the CBAs expected to have deployed on the Web site by the deadline were available. According to USDA documentation, OMB had not approved these forms because some forms appeared to be for the department's internal use, did not have clear and user-friendly instructions, or did not include forms instructions that conformed to the format standard established by OMB and the agencies. As of December 31, 2000, RD had not resubmitted any of its forms for OMB review. A marketing brochure, being developed by the CBAs to promote public awareness of the e-file effort, was still in production at the end of December 2000, and the CBAs had decided not to issue any press releases publicizing the new e-file Web site. In addition, because the CBAs decided that training needs for service center employees were minimal at this phase of the project, informational directives on the new program were provided to employees in lieu of giving them training. Fully meeting all remaining e-file mandates to successfully establish effective and secure electronic filing capabilities by June 2002 poses far more complex and difficult tasks for USDA, such as reengineering business processes and establishing reliable and secure methods of transmitting and storing all electronic records. Moreover, since the E-File Act requires USDA to continue providing services through non electronic means as well, the department will also face increased workload demands supporting dual service delivery functions--one electronic and one paper-based. At the end of our review in December 2000, USDA did not have a detailed plan for how it would implement these actions and had not identified how much funding or what staff resources would be required to carry out them out. In response to the E-File Act, RMA began work on the required December 1, 2000, plan for allowing agricultural producers the option of obtaining, over the Internet from approved insurance providers, all forms and other information, and filing all paperwork required for participation electronically. RMA's initial efforts focused on establishing and distributing guidelines and policies for crop insurance providers to follow in meeting their e-file responsibilities. By the time of our November briefing, RMA had issued its final e-file guidelines. RMA met the December 1, 2000, deadline for submitting a plan to Congress. This plan outlines the process the agency will use to ensure that insurance providers comply with the act's e-file requirements. Specifically, insurance providers must follow RMA's issued guidelines and submit a completed e-business plan to RMA for approval no later than April 1, 2001. RMA said it expects full implementation, as the act requires, by December 1, 2001. USDA has made progress and has partially met initial E-File Act deadlines for providing agricultural producers with access to forms via the Internet and submitting required reports on initial e-file activities and plans to Congress. However, implementing full e-filing capabilities for all its farm service customers by the deadlines set by the act poses a far more complex and difficult challenge. A component critical to the success of any such initiative is the necessary authority and responsibility to manage it across different departmental entities, yet no single official has been so designated. Also, a comprehensive implementation plan--one that addresses both GPEA, the Freedom to E-File Act requirements, and OMB's implementation guidelines--is critical to help the department achieve a more consistent approach in its entire e-government transformation. To ensure that USDA fully meets its E-File Act mandates, we recommend that the Secretary of Agriculture assign a senior-level official with overall responsibility, authority, and accountability for managing and carrying out implementation for both CBAs and RMA E-File Act requirements; direct the assigned official to work with RD and OMB to expedite resubmission and approval of all appropriate RD forms and ensure that these forms are made available over the Internet as soon as possible; and direct the assigned official, in cooperation with the undersecretaries for Farm and Foreign Agricultural Service, Natural Resources and Environment, and Rural Development, and the OCIO, to develop and document a comprehensive plan for implementing all E-File Act requirements. In developing the department's comprehensive plan, we further recommend that the Secretary of Agriculture direct the assigned senior official to document and track all critical activities and milestones, dependencies among major activities, and resources needed to complete these efforts. In addition, the plan should clearly describe all project tasks, their priorities, and time frames and milestones for their completion; assign task responsibilities to staff and show critical dependencies identify required staff/budget resources for completing the plan; and document contingency actions planned to address unforeseen work delays or problems. We also recommend that the Secretary direct the assigned senior official to include both e-file and GPEA requirements in the department's comprehensive plan to help better coordinate actions across USDA agencies and apply a consistent approach for addressing all mandated requirements and deadlines during USDA's e-file government transformation. Finally, we recommend that the Secretary hold the senior official accountable for carrying out the comprehensive plan and require that this official provide quarterly reports to the Secretary describing the results of USDA's efforts to implement each of these actions and all e-file requirements. On November 8, 2000, we provided a copy of our briefing materials, which were used in preparing this report, to USDA's CIO, deputy CIO, and officials representing USDA's CBAs and RMA. These officials generally agreed with our briefing. They stated that providing more focused leadership and having a comprehensive implementation plan for the e-file effort would increase the department's overall chances of success with fully implementing the Freedom to E-File Act. In its December 22, 2000, progress report to Congress, and consistent with our recommendations, USDA said that it plans to begin an effort to develop comprehensive project plans for enhanced services that meet the 2-year requirements of the Freedom to E-File Act and GPEA in January 2001. On February 13, 2001, USDA's Acting CIO provided written comments on a draft of this report. USDA's comments are summarized below and reproduced in appendix II. USDA said that it fully supports the spirit and intent, as well as the legal mandates, of the e-file act. USDA agreed that it had problems meeting the act's initial December 18, 2000, deadline for deploying electronic forms on the Internet and that significant challenges remain to fully implement the act. USDA also stated that successful implementation of the act will require continued funding, along with understanding and support of the USDA's programs or "owners" of the business being transformed. USDA agreed with our recommendation for making RD forms available on the Internet as soon as possible. The department also agreed that comprehensive plans must be developed for implementing the Freedom to E-File Act and GPEA to help better coordinate across agencies and apply a consistent approach for addressing USDA's e-transformation. However, the department stopped short of describing the extent to which its comprehensive plan will include all the detailed steps we recommended or what the department's time frame is for completing it. Moreover, it was unclear from USDA's response whether the department planned to implement our recommendation for assigning a senior-level official with overall e-file responsibility, authority, and accountability for managing and carrying out implementation of the E-File Act requirements. With respect to our last recommendation for providing the Secretary quarterly reports on implementation results, USDA stated that OCIO will continue to ensure that the Secretary is fully informed on the department's progress in meeting the E-File Act requirements. However, the department did not specify when and how progress will be reported to the Secretary nor did it describe how accountability for results will be ensured. We continue to believe that having a senior-level official vested with sufficient accountability and authority is important to the success of USDA's e-file implementation efforts. As requested, our objective was to review measures being taken by the department to implement the provisions of the Freedom to E-File Act. In carrying out our work, we obtained and reviewed USDA and contractor documents and discussed actions planned or under way with department officials handling implementation of the act and assessed progress made. On November 15, 2000, we briefed your staff on the results of our review up to that point. Our work on the briefing was performed from August through October 2000. We performed follow-up work to update USDA's progress implementing the act through December 31, 2000. The results of all of our work are summarized in this report. We conducted our review at USDA headquarters in Washington, D.C., and at key agency offices involved in e- file activities in Fort Collins, Colorado, and Kansas City, Missouri. Our work was done in accordance with generally accepted government auditing standards. As agreed with your office, unless you publicly announce the contents of this report earlier, we plan no further distribution until 30 days from its date. At that time, we will send copies to Representative Eva Clayton, Ranking Minority Member, Subcommittee on Department Operations, Oversight, Nutrition, and Forestry, House Committee on Agriculture; Senator Richard Lugar, Chairman, and Senator Tom Harkin, Ranking Member, Senate Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry; Representative Larry Combest, Chairman, and Representative Charles Stenholm, Ranking Minority Member, House Committee on Agriculture; Representative Tom Davis, Chairman, Representative Jo Ann Davis, Vice Chairwoman, and Representative Jim Turner, Ranking Minority Member, Subcommittee on Technology and Procurement Policy, House Committee on Government Reform; and Representative Stephen Horn, Chairman, Representative Ron Lewis, Vice Chairman, and Representative Janice Schakowski, Ranking Minority Member, Subcommittee on Government Efficiency, Financial Management and Intergovernmental Relations, House Committee on Government Reform. We will also send copies to the Honorable Ann M. Veneman, Secretary of Agriculture; the Honorable Mitchell E. Daniels, Jr., Director, Office of Management and Budget; and other interested parties. Copies will also be made available to others upon request. Should you have any questions on matters discussed in this report, please contact me at (202) 512-6257 or Stephen A. Schwartz, Senior Assistant Director, at (202) 512-6213. We can also be reached by e-mail at mcclured@gao.gov and schwartzs@gao.gov, respectively. Conservation Service (NRCS), and Rural Development (RD) mission area--hereafter referred to collectively as County- based Agencies (CBAs), and the Risk Management Agency (RMA) to establish an electronic filing and retrieval system enabling farmers and others to file paperwork electronically. Provides separate requirements for the CBAs and RMA. an Internet-based system enabling agricultural producers to access all forms and shall submit to Congress a report that describes the progress made. Not later than June 20, 2002, the system shall be expanded to enable producers to access and file all forms and, at the option of the Secretary, selected records and information. Congress a plan to allow agricultural producers the option of obtaining, over the Internet from approved insurance providers, all forms and other information and filing all paperwork required for participation electronically. Not later than December 1, 2001, RMA should complete implementation of the plan. *RMA administers the federal crop insurance program, under which insurance policies are sold and serviced by private companies to help protect agricultural producers against crop losses due to drought, flooding, and other unavoidable causes. 105-277, October 28, 1998)* requires that by 2003, federal agencies provide the public, where practicable, the option of submitting, maintaining, or disclosing information--such as employment records, tax forms, and loan applications-- electronically, instead of on paper. On the basis of guidance issued by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), agencies are preparing plans for implementing GPEA, including the use of electronic signatures. *P.L. No. 105-277, Div.C, tit XVII. E-File Act, the Secretary issued a memorandum to the undersecretaries for the affected agencies, requiring that one shared plan be developed and implemented to meet E- File Act requirements and the plan be submitted to Office of Chief Information Officer (OCIO) no later than September 30, 2000. Secretary assigned the undersecretaries and mission area leaders with collective responsibility for developing and implementing e-file activities and gave OCIO the role of coordinating/facilitating e-file implementation planning. In response to the Secretary's memorandum, the undersecretaries approved and transmitted the "Mission Area Report on Freedom to E-File Legislation" to the CIO on October 17, 2000. The report, which included two separate sections covering the CBAs and RMA, provides general information on USDA activities to address e-file requirements. establish and define all major activities and milestones, dependencies among activities, and resources necessary to complete them or assign a senior-level official with overall responsibility and accountability for managing and implementing all the separate e-file activities. purchased an on-line common forms software tool for selected a total of 219 forms (57 from FSA, 6 from NRCS, and 156 from RD) to post on the Web (USDA believes customers can complete these on their own with assistance only from form completion instructions), coordinated with OMB to develop a user-friendly format and are working to obtain OMB approval for each new electronic form, and designed and is implementing a common Internet Web site that can utilize a single Internet address to provide user access with common search and retrieval functions for all available forms. to be done to meet the December 18 deadline. For example, CBAs still need to obtain final OMB approval for each of the contractor testing of the Web page design, which is not addressed in the October 17 report, was scheduled to be completed December 15, the last workday before the deadline, and some key technical staff who were implementing web farm hardware, software, and security had other full-time duties and had no replacements should they be assigned elsewhere. plans still needed to be established to train county-based field office staff in the new e-filing procedures and in providing customer assistance and publicizing USDA's new e-file services and notifying the public on how to use them still needed to be done. USDA officials working on these activities believe that these tasks can be accomplished by the December 18 deadline. establishing full e-government services across a broad range of USDA building in solutions that also address GPEA and OMB requirements. reengineering numerous existing programs and systems, using multiple electronic submission processes to accommodate various categories of agency customers, designing and investing in technology to securely connect service center agencies to customers and to USDA's national network, developing software to move and utilize data collected from customers to appropriate serving locations, and training employees in new roles, responsibilities, and technologies. workload increases. E-File Act requires USDA to continue providing services in the traditional way to customers who choose not to use the Internet. CBAs must therefore support dual service delivery functions--one electronic and one paper-based. identified how much funding and staff resources will be needed to fully implement the act. The E-File Act provides that the Secretary is to reserve, from applicable accounts of the CBAs, not more than $3 million for fiscal year 2001 and $2 million for each subsequent fiscal year. Decisions on use of these accounts and funding are still pending. planning on how USDA will carry out the tasks needed to meet the June 20, 2002, deadline for implementing full electronic filing capabilities will not begin until January 2001. In response to the E-File Act, RMA is working on a December 1, 2000, plan for allowing agricultural producers the option of obtaining, over the Internet from approved insurance providers, all forms and other information and filing all paperwork required for participation electronically. *These were issued in final on November 1, 2000. the location and type of data made available where paperwork can be filed and responsibilities of the applicable parties. RMA said it approved plans from two participating insurance providers on September 26, 2000, enabling them to market and service federal crop insurance programs over the Internet. File Act, and the CBAs' and RMA's October 17 report, done in response to the Secretary's request for a shared e-file plan, generally discusses their actions. However, several steps essential to the overall success of USDA's e-file initiative remain to be done. Specifically, USDA has not assigned a senior-level official with overall responsibility, authority, and accountability for managing and implementing all the separate activities to ensure that critical tasks are completed on time and within budget and that all federal mandates are met. USDA has also not yet developed and documented a comprehensive e-file implementation plan. Having such a plan is important to define the milestones for all major activities, dependencies and critical tasks among these activities, and resources required to complete them; help identify priorities as to which activities must be completed first and where milestone and resource shifts may be made to ensure that the most critical activities are completed on time, within budget, and, more important, are successful; and address OMB and GPEA requirements by coordinating actions across mission areas and applying a more consistent approach during USDA's e-government transformation. To ensure that USDA fully meets its E-File Act mandates, the assign a senior-level official with overall responsibility, authority, and accountability for managing and carrying out implementation of all E-File Act requirements and direct that the assigned senior-level official, in cooperation with the undersecretaries for Farm and Foreign Agricultural Service, Natural Resources and Environment, and Rural Development, and the CIO, develop and document a comprehensive plan for implementing all E-File Act requirements. describe all project tasks, their priority, and time frames and milestones for their completion; assign task responsibilities to staff and show critical dependencies identify required staff/budget resources for completing the plan; and document contingency actions planned to address unforeseen work delays or problems. In addition, the comprehensive plan should cover both e-file and GPEA requirements to help better coordinate actions across USDA agencies and apply a consistent approach for addressing all mandated requirements and deadlines during USDA's e- government transformation. The first copy of each GAO report is free. Additional copies of reports are $2 each. A check or money order should be made out to the Superintendent of Documents. VISA and MasterCard credit cards are accepted, also. Orders for 100 or more copies to be mailed to a single address are discounted 25 percent. Orders by mail: U.S. General Accounting Office P.O. Box 37050 Washington, DC 20013 Orders by visiting: Room 1100 700 4th St. NW (corner of 4th and G Sts. NW) U.S. General Accounting Office Washington, DC Orders by phone: (202) 512-6000 fax: (202) 512-6061 TDD (202) 512-2537 Each day, GAO issues a list of newly available reports and testimony. To receive facsimile copies of the daily list or any list from the past 30 days, please call (202) 512-6000 using a touchtone phone. A recorded menu will provide information on how to obtain these lists. Web site: http://www.gao.gov/fraudnet/fraudnet.htm e-mail: fraudnet@gao.gov 1-800-424-5454 (automated answering system)

Summary:
The Department of Agriculture (USDA) has made progress in implementing the Freedom to E-File Act and has partially met the act's initial deadlines for providing agricultural producers with access to forms via the Internet and submitting required reports on initial e-file activities and plans to Congress. However, implementing full e-filing capabilities for all its farm service customers by the deadlines set by the act poses a far more complex and difficult challenge. Critical to the success of any such initiative is the necessary authority and responsibility to manage it across different departmental entities. Yet no single official has been so designated. Also, a comprehensive implementation plan--one that addresses both the Government Paperwork Elimination Act (GPEA), the Freedom to E-File Act requirements, and Office of Management and Budget's (OMB) implementation guidelines--is critical to help USDA achieve a more consistent approach in its entire e-government transformation.