Since the September 11 attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, the United States has launched three major military operations: Operation Noble Eagle (ONE), Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF), and Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF). Operation Noble Eagle is the name given to military operations related to homeland security and support to federal, state, and local agencies in the wake of the September 11 attacks. Operation Enduring Freedom includes ongoing operations in Afghanistan, operations against terrorists in other countries, and training assistance to foreign militaries which are conducting operations against terrorists. Operation Iraqi Freedom includes the invasion of Iraq, the defeat of Saddam Hussein's regime, and the subsequent rebuilding and counter-insurgency operations in Iraq. This report provides short answers to commonly asked questions about military personnel and compensation issues related to these operations. The questions are grouped into three major thematic areas: personnel, compensation, and force structure. The section on personnel addresses issues such as casualties, reserve mobilization, "sole surviving" son or daughter status, conscientious objection, and "stop-loss." The section on compensation addresses issues related to the pay and benefits--including casualty and death benefits--provided to members of the U.S. military participating in ONE/OEF/OIF and their families. The section on force structure addresses issues related to how ONE/OEF/OIF might affect the number of personnel needed by the military, and answers common questions about whether or not a return to conscription is likely under current circumstances. As of January 17, 2006, there were 255 fatalities among U.S. military personnel serving in OEF. Of these, 130 were categorized as killed in action, while 125 were categorized as non-hostile deaths. As of that same date, 677 military personnel had been wounded in action while serving in OEF. Of these, 275 were returned to duty within 72 hours. As of January 17, 2006, there were 2,242 fatalities among U.S. military personnel serving in OIF. Of these, 1,761 were categorized as hostile deaths and 481 as non-hostile. As of that same date, 16,420 military personnel had been wounded in action while serving in OIF. Of these, 8,812 were returned to duty within 72 hours. As of January 15, 2006, there was one U.S. soldier classified as a POW, Private First Class Keith M. Maupin who was captured on April 9, 2004. There were no U.S. military personnel classified as MIA. Between September 11, 2001 and January 17, 2006, a total of 532,539 reservists (which includes the National Guard) were involuntarily called to active duty under federal orders for ONE, OEF, and OIF. Of these, 126,5345 were serving on active duty as of January 17, 2006, while 406,005 had been demobilized prior to that date after completing their tours. Note, however, that the total mobilization and demobilization figures count reservists more than once if they have been mobilized more than once. The total number of individuals mobilized is therefore lower than stated above, and probably by a significant margin due to the number of people who have been called up more than once. These reservists were called to active duty under a mobilization authority known as Partial Mobilization. In time of a national emergency declared by the President, Partial Mobilization authorizes the Service Secretaries to order members of the Ready Reserve to active duty for a period not to exceed 24 consecutive months. Up to 1 million members of the Ready Reserve may serve on active duty at any one time under this provision of law. The President may declare a national emergency and mobilize reservists under this provision of law without approval from Congress. This authority was also used to mobilize reservists during the later part of the Persian Gulf War (1991). DOD's general policy has been to keep reservists on active duty for no more than one year; and in the majority of cases to date, mobilized reservists have not been required to serve more than one year. However, the policy does allow the Service Secretary to keep reservists on active duty for up to 24 cumulative months if they are needed to meet operational or other requirements. It should be noted that DOD's policy capping reserve service at 24 cumulative months is more restrictive than the 24 consecutive month cap specified in law. If DOD were to change its policy to mirror the law, reservists could be mobilized multiple times for tours of 24 consecutive months apiece. Also, some members of the National Guard have been called up to perform duties related to ONE in a non-federal status . Additionally, in 2001 and 2002, thousands of members of the National Guard were activated at the order of their respective governors to provide additional security at airports. They were called up under Title 32 of the U.S. Code, which means they were under state control, but with federal pay and benefits. These distinctions have a significant bearing on the type of pay, benefits, and legal protections to which the affected individuals are entitled. For more information on this topic, see CRS Report RL30802, Reserve Component Personnel Issues: Questions and Answers , by [author name scrubbed]. No statute governs the deployment of "sole surviving" sons and daughters in today's all-volunteer military. However, the Department of Defense does have an administrative policy governing assignments of a "sole surviving" son or daughter. This policy allows "sole surviving" sons or daughters to apply for a protective assignment status which, once approved, prohibits his or her assignment "to any overseas area designated as a hostile-fire or imminent-danger area ... nor to duties that regularly might subject him or her to combat with the enemy." In addition to protective assignment, enlisted personnel who become sole surviving sons or daughters after having entered service may also apply for and be granted a discharge in most circumstances. However, the term " sole surviving son or daughter " does not simply mean the only child in a family. According to DOD's definition, a sole surviving son or daughter is the only remaining son or daughter in a family where the father or mother, or one or more sons or daughters, served in the Armed Forces of the United States and, because of hazards with such military service, either (1) was killed, (2) died as a result of wounds, accident or disease, (3) is in a captured or missing-in-action (MIA) status, or (4) is permanently 100-percent disabled, is hospitalized on a continuing basis, and is not employed gainfully because of such disability. The "sole surviving" son or daughter issue is different from the commonly cited, albeit fictional, "Sullivan Act" or "Sullivan Law." The Sullivans were five brothers serving on board a single U.S. Navy ship (the U.S.S. Juneau ) during World War II. Their ship was sunk by the Japanese on November 13, 1942, and all of the brothers died. In response to this tragedy, some proposals were made to prohibit brothers from serving together on the same ship, but Congress did not pass any such law, nor did the President issue an executive order to that effect. In response to a similar tragedy which occurred the previous year (three brothers serving aboard the U.S.S. Arizona perished during the Pearl Harbor attacks) the Navy did issue a policy forbidding commanding officers from approving requests from brothers to serve together, but the policy was apparently not enforced and did not prohibit the Navy from assigning brothers to the same ship. Current DOD policy states that "concurrent assigning of service members of the immediate family to the same military unit or ship is not prohibited, but requests for reassignment to a different unit or ship may be approved for all but one service member." Approval of such requests, however, are contingent upon military requirements. No statute governs the treatment of conscientious objectors currently serving in the military. However, the Department of Defense does have an administrative policy relating to this issue. Of course, in today's all-volunteer military, those who have moral objections to participating in war will likely choose not to join the military. Nonetheless, some people volunteer to join the armed forces with every intention of fulfilling their military obligations, but later develop religious or moral objections to participation in war. Such people may apply for transfer to non-combat related duties or for an administrative discharge, depending on the nature of their convictions. Following application, a formal investigatory procedure is initiated by the military to ascertain the facts and nature of the applicant's claim. Based on this investigation and the criteria for granting conscientious objector status defined in the DOD policy, a determination is made to either grant or deny the applicant's claim. With respect to the criteria for granting conscientious objector status, a crucial one is the requirement that the individual be "opposed to participation in war in any form." In other words, the objection "must be to all wars rather than a specific war." This standard precludes those who are opposed to some wars, but not all wars, from being classified as conscientious objectors. In 2000, slightly over 100 servicemembers applied for conscientious objector status; in 2004 this number was over 400. Of those who apply, approximately half are approved. Yes, if a service member is killed, dies, or is declared captured or missing, the other service members of the same family will be exempt, upon request, from serving in designated hostile-fire areas or if already serving in such as area, will be reassigned. This also applies to those who are categorized as 100% disabled by the Service or the Veterans Administration. In addition, wounded personnel who have been medically evacuated and hospitalized for more than 30 days outside the hostile-fire area will not be returned during the same tour; they may, however, be eligible for subsequent combat tours. This provision does not apply to those hospitalized for injury, accident, illness, self-inflicted wounds, or other non-combat causes. Under federal law, the President has the authority to suspend laws related to promotion, retirement and separation of military personnel during a period of time when members of the Reserve Component have been involuntarily ordered to active federal service. Since 1990, this authority has been delegated to the Secretary of Defense by executive order. Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld delegated this authority to each of the individual military services on September 19, 2001, allowing those services to "stop loss" by keeping individuals on active duty beyond their normal date of separation or retirement. Stop-loss has usually been implemented to permit the military to retain people with critical skills during a time of crisis. Since September 11, 2001, all of the Services have implemented such "skill based" stop loss for various lengths of time, although none of the Services currently have such a policy in effect. However, the Army has implemented a stop-loss policy which delays the departure of personnel from units deploying to Iraq and Afghanistan until 90 days after the unit returns from its deployment. The purpose of this "unit based" stop-loss is to maintain unit cohesion and thereby maximize military effectiveness among units headed for a combat environment. The Army has both an Active Army and Reserve Component Unit Stop Loss program. Under both, soldiers are affected from 90 days prior to their unit's mobilization/deployment date through their demobilizatioin/redeployment date, plus a maximum of 90 days. As of December 31, 2005 , stop loss impacted 12,467 soldiers (7,620 active component, 2,418 Reserve and 2,429 National Guard) Most involuntary separations--for example, discharges due to criminal acts--will not be affected by stop-loss. Additionally, the adoption of a stop-loss policy does not modify service policies or regulations which might lead to an administrative discharge (e.g. for homosexuality) or to a medical discharge. Most recently, Congress has required the Secretary of Defense to report on the actions being taken to ensure that new enlistees are adequately informed concerning service stop loss policies. Many military personnel participating in OEF and OIF are eligible for Hostile Fire or Imminent Danger Pay (HF/IDP). HF/IDP is authorized by 37 U.S.C. 310, which provides a special pay for "duty subject to hostile fire or imminent danger." While DOD regulations distinguish between Hostile Fire Pay and Imminent Danger Pay, they are both derived from the same statute and an individual can only collect Hostile Fire Pay or Imminent Danger Pay, not both simultaneously. The purpose of this pay is to compensate servicemembers for physical danger. Iraq, Afghanistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia and many other nearby countries have been declared imminent danger zones. Military personnel serving in such designated areas are eligible for HF/IDP. To be eligible for this pay in a given month, a servicemember must have served some time in one of the designated zones, even if only a day or less. The authorizing statute for HF/IDP sets the rate at $225 per month. Military personnel serving in Iraq, Afghanistan, parts of the Persian Gulf region, and certain nearby areas are also eligible for Hardship Duty Pay (HDP). HDP is authorized by 37 U.S.C. 305. It is compensation for the exceptional demands of certain duty, including unusually demanding mission assignments or service in areas with extreme climates or austere facilities. The maximum amount of HDP was recently increased by Congress from $300 to $750 per month. The current rate of HDP for Iraq and Afghanistan is $100 per month. Military personnel participating in OEF and OIF may also be eligible for Family Separation Allowance (FSA). FSA is authorized by 37 U.S.C. 427, which provides a special pay for those servicemembers with dependents who are separated from their families for more than 30 days. The purpose of this pay is to "partially reimburse, on average, members of the uniformed services involuntarily separated from their dependents for the reasonable amount of extra expenses that result from such separation...." To be eligible for this allowance, U.S. military personnel must be separated from their dependents for 30 continuous days or more; but once the 30-day threshold has been reached, the allowance is applied retroactively to the first day of separation. The authorizing statute for FSA sets the rate at $250 per month. Another benefit available to those deployed to Afghanistan, Iraq, and other designated areas nearby is eligibility for the Savings Deposit Program. This program allows service members to earn a guaranteed rate of 10 percent interest on deposits of up to $10,000, which must have been earned in the designated areas. The deposit is normally returned to the servicemember, with interest, within 90 days after he or she leaves the eligible region, although earlier withdrawals can sometimes be made for emergency reasons. Finally, there is a tax benefit for many of those serving overseas in OEF or OIF called the "combat zone tax exclusion." Afghanistan and the airspace above it have been designated a "combat zone" since September 19, 2001. Military personnel serving in direct support of the operations in this combat zone are also eligible for the combat zone tax exclusion. Additionally, certain areas in the Persian Gulf region --including Iraq--have been designated combat zones since 1991. Military personnel serving in direct support of operations in this combat zone are also eligible for the combat zone tax exclusion. For enlisted personnel and warrant officers, this means that all compensation for active military service in a combat zone is free of federal income tax. For commissioned officers, their compensation is free of federal income tax up to the maximum amount of enlisted basic pay plus any imminent danger pay received. While the combat zone tax exclusion contained in federal law applies only to federal income tax, almost all states have provisions extending the benefit to their state income tax as well. Dependents of active duty military personnel who die in the line of duty are eligible for a variety of special payments and benefits. The major compensation and benefit programs are listed below. The death gratuity is a lump sum payment to the surviving spouse of the servicemember, or to the children of the servicemember in equal shares if there is no spouse. The payment amount was recently increased by Congress from $12,420 to $100,000 for all active duty deaths and made retroactive to October 7, 2001. The death gratuity may also be paid if death occurs within 120 days after release from active duty if the death resulted from injury or disease incurred or aggravated during military service. The purpose of this benefit is to provide cash quickly to the survivors in order to help them meet immediate needs. The servicemembers' designated beneficiary, or the statutorily specified next of kin if no beneficiary was designated, is entitled to a payment for any unused leave the servicemember had accrued at the time of death. All members of the military are automatically enrolled in SGLI for the maximum benefit of $400,000. Servicemembers may reduce or decline coverage under SGLI, but doing so requires that they request this in writing. In contrast to most civilian life insurance providers, SGLI pays benefits in the event of combat-related deaths. Effective September 10, 2001, all active duty personnel are covered by the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). Under the SBP, if a servicemember dies while on active duty, the surviving spouse is entitled to an annuity, which is based in part on the deceased's basic pay level and years of service. The interaction between SBP benefits, Social Security benefits, and Dependency and Indemnity Compensation is complex and may result in reduced or offset SBP benefits. For a full description of these interactions, see CRS Report RL31664, The Military Survivor Benefit Plan: A Description of Its Provisions , by [author name scrubbed]. SBP payments are terminated for a surviving spouse who remarries before age 55. The Dependency and Indemnity Compensation (DIC) program, administered by the Department of Veterans' Affairs, provides a monthly payment to unremarried surviving spouses, or eligible children, of servicemembers who die because of service related illnesses or injuries. At present, the monthly payment for surviving spouses is $1,033 per month, plus $257 per child. Additional payments can also be made if the survivor has certain disabilities. See the previous paragraph on the Survivor Benefit Plan for important information on the combination of DIC with other government provided annuities. Surviving spouses and children of servicemembers who die while on active duty may be eligible for Social Security Survivor benefits if they meet certain eligibility requirements. The amount of benefits varies based on a number of factors, including the average lifetime earnings of the decedent, the number of quarters the decedent paid Social Security taxes, and certain characteristics of the beneficiary, such as age and relationship to the decedent. Remarriage can have an effect on a widow's or widower's benefit. See the previous paragraph on the Survivor Benefit Plan for important information on the combination of Social Security benefits with other government provided annuities. The following expenses may either be paid directly by the military service to which the deceased belonged, or reimbursed to the individual who pays for them: "(1) Recovery and identification of the remains. (2) Notification of the next of kin or other appropriate person. (3) Preparation of the remains for burial, including cremation if requested by the person designated to direct disposition of the remains. (4) Furnishing of a uniform or other clothing. (5) Furnishing of a casket or urn, or both, with outside box. (6) Hearse service. (7) Funeral director's service. (8) Transportation of the remains, and round-trip transportation and prescribed allowances for an escort of one person, to the place selected by the person designated to direct disposition of the remains or, if such a selection is not made, to a national or other cemetery which is selected by the Secretary and in which burial of the decedent is authorized. (9) Interment of the remains. (10) Presentation of a flag of the United States to the person designated to direct disposition of the remains. (11) Presentation of a flag of equal size to the flag presented under paragraph (10) to the parents or parent, if the person to be presented a flag under paragraph (10) is other than the parent of the decedent." Members of the Armed Forces who die while on active duty are eligible for burial in national cemeteries, including Arlington National Cemetery. The government provides a grave site, opening and closing of the grave, headstone or marker, and maintenance of the site at no cost to the family. Interment of cremated remains in a columbarium is an option as well. The FY2006 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) allows the Secretary of Defense to permit the family of a servicemember who dies on active duty to remain in government quarters for up to 365 days, free of charge. Alternatively, the Secretary can authorize payment of the Basic Allowance for Housing, a tax-free allowance designed to cover most of the costs of civilian housing in a given region, for 365 days. Previously, these benefits had been limited to 180 days. The unremarried surviving spouse of a deceased servicemember remains eligible for TRICARE, the military health care system, until age 65. At age 65, the surviving spouse becomes eligible for TRICARE for Life, provided he or she has Medicare Part A and Part B coverage. Children of the deceased servicemember remain eligible for TRICARE until they become 21 years of age, although eligibility may extend past age 21 if the child meets certain requirements and is either enrolled full time in an institution of higher learning or has a severe disability. Surviving family members of a deceased servicemember receive TRICARE benefits at the active duty dependent rate for a three year period, after which they receive TRICARE benefits at the retiree dependent rates. The unremarried surviving spouse of a deceased servicemember is eligible for unlimited access to the commissary and exchange systems indefinitely. Children of a deceased servicemember are eligible for unlimited access to the commissary and exchange system until they become 21 years of age or get married, although eligibility may extend past age 21 if the child meets certain requirements and is either enrolled full time in an institution of higher learning or has a severe disability. The Survivors' and Dependants' Educational Assistance program, administered by the Department of Veterans' Affairs, provides up to 45 months of educational assistance to unremarried surviving spouses, or eligible children, of servicemembers who die in the line of duty. At present, the monthly payment is $803 per month for full-time attendance at eligible institutions; a lesser amount is paid for part-time attendance. Unremarried spouses have up to ten years to use this benefit. Children may generally receive benefits between the ages of 18 and 26, although there are circumstances where a child can receive benefits before 18 or after 26. This benefit can be used for undergraduate or graduate study, technical or vocational schooling, correspondence courses, some types of on-the-job training, and certain other educational programs. Casualties from ongoing combat operations in Iraq and Afghanistan have received media attention and Members of Congress have frequently expressed concern about the level of care for those severely injured or wounded service members and their families. As a result, several new programs have been established: While the Servicemembers' Group Life Insurance (SGLI) program has offered low-cost life insurance to military personnel, there has not been, until recently, a provision for disability coverage. Effective December 1, 2005, all service members were insured for traumatic injuries at a monthly premium of $1.00, unless they decline coverage. This program, colloquially referred to as TSGLI or Traumatic SGLI, provides an immediate payment between $25,000 and $100,000 to ease the financial burden associated with hospitalization, recovery and rehabilitation. Those who are blind, deaf, paralyzed, severely burned or multiple amputees will qualify for the $100,000 maximum. Other severe injuries will be compensated on a sliding scale of $25,000, $50,000 and $75,000 based on the severity and duration of the condition. TSGLI is not disability compensation and it has no effect on Veterans Administration entitlements. The Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness is responsible for implementing the program with the services. TSGLI is retroactive to October 7, 2001 if the loss was a direct result of injuries received in OEF or OIF. Based on the FY2006 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) , service members who are wounded, injured or become ill in a combat zone (as determined by the Secretary of Defense) and who are medically evacuated, will receive a special pay of $430 per month during the period of their hospitalization, recovery and rehabilitation. The special pay will be reduced by any amount of hostile fire or imminent danger pay that is received and the pay is not retroactive. Because service members receive a Basic Allowance for Subsistence, they have routinely been charged for meals while hospitalized in military medical treatment facilities. Previous legislation had temporarily waived this charge. However, with passage of the FY2006 National Defense Authorization Act , service members are no longer required to pay for these meals while they are undergoing continuous care, to include outpatient care, for an injury, illness or disease incurred in support of OEF, OIF or other military operations designated by the Secretary of Defense. This exemption is now effective from October 1, 2005 through December 31, 2006. Military personnel, including reservists called into active federal service, are eligible for a broad array of legal protections under the Servicemembers' Civil Relief Act (SCRA) of 2003. (Note, however, that National Guardsmen who are serving in a purely state status are not covered by the SCRA; National Guardsmen performing full time National Guard duty under Title 32, section 502(f) of the U.S. Code are eligible for coverage under the SCRA in certain circumstances). Among other things, the SCRA provides military personnel with certain protections against rental property evictions, mortgage foreclosures, insurance cancellations, and government property seizures to pay tax bills. The SCRA also limits to 6 percent the amount of interest that the servicemember has to pay on loans--except student loans--incurred prior to entry onto active duty. Usually, the provisions of the SCRA only apply during the period of active military service, or for a short period of time afterwards. For a full description of the legal protections provided to activated reservists by the SCRA, see the CRS Report RL32360, The Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (P.L. 108-189) , by [author name scrubbed]. Prior to the September 11 attacks, there was a serious debate between Congress and the executive branch over whether the military was being tasked with more missions than it could realistically handle, given its manpower levels. Congress was especially concerned that these missions--in Bosnia, Kosovo, Southwest Asia, the Sinai, and elsewhere--might be producing personnel tempo (PERSTEMPO) levels high enough to have a negative effect on retention. As such, Congress passed laws requiring the services to track the PERSTEMPO of every servicemember, to monitor individual PERSTEMPO levels more closely, and to pay an allowance to servicemembers assigned lengthy or numerous deployments. Similar concerns about PERSTEMPO led General Eric Shinseki, the Army Chief of Staff, to assert before the House Armed Services Committee in July, 2001, that "Given today's mission profile, the Army is too small for the mission load it is carrying." During that hearing, both Shinseki and Secretary of the Army Thomas White endorsed a proposal to increase the Army's end strength from 480,000 to 520,000 soldiers. Since September 11, 2001, operations Noble Eagle, Enduring Freedom and Iraqi Freedom have dramatically increased the manpower needs of the military services, especially for the Army, which has shouldered the bulk of the manpower burden associated with the occupation of Iraq. These manpower needs have been filled primarily through the call up of over 500,000 reservists, longer duty days and higher PERSTEMPO rates for many active duty personnel, and the use of contract personnel. So far, this response has enabled the military to perform its assigned missions, but some observers note that it could cause problems in the future--for example, in unacceptably low retention rates, unacceptable performance levels, and difficulty responding to new crises--if carried out over an extended period of time. In order to prevent such problems from occurring, Congress and the executive branch have taken a number of actions. For example, at the end of FY2003 and FY2004 the Department of Defense invoked a statutory provision which allowed it to exceeded its authorized end strength. Additionally, Congress recently authorized an increase of 20,000 to the size of the active Army and an increase of 3,000 to the size of the active Marine Corps in the Ronald W. Reagan National Defense Authorization Act for FY2005. A separate provision in that law gives the Secretary of Defense the authority to temporarily increase the size of the Army by another 10,000 people, and the size of the Marine Corps by 6,000 people. Most recently, the FY2006 National Defense Authorization Act provides for an active duty end strength (as of September 30, 2006) of 512,400 for the Army (an increase of 30,000) and an end strength of 179,000 for the Marine Corps (an increase of 4,000). Furthermore, this legislation authorized additional annual increases of 20,000 for the Army and 5,000 for the Marine Corps for each FY2007 through 2009. However, the Army is having difficulty increasing its strength due to recruiting shortfalls. Another prominent initiative intended to reduce manpower strain is the Army's ongoing effort to reorganize itself, converting from a divisional structure to one based on brigade sized "units of action." The Army believes that this reorganization will increase its pool of deployable units, which could help reduce PERSTEMPO rates. The Army is also shifting of some critical military capabilities from the reserve component to the active component, thereby reducing the need to call up reserve units to support military operations, and retraining personnel from skills in lower demand (such as air defense and artillery) to skills in higher demand (such as military police). Other alternatives which have been suggested include contracting out more functions to the private sector, increasing the use of technologies which reduce manpower needs, securing greater participation in Iraq and Afghanistan by allied military personnel, reducing U.S. involvement in missions such as the Sinai and Kosovo, and withdrawing U.S. forces from Iraq in relatively large numbers. Any attempt to reinstate the draft would require congressional approval. The legal framework for conscription is codified in law, but the law contains a provision which prohibits actual induction into the Armed Forces after July 1, 1973. To reinstate the draft, Congress would have to pass legislation reauthorizing inductions. At the present time, it appears unlikely that the U.S. will reinstate the draft to meet its manpower needs. While the Army and some of the Reserve Components are having difficulty making recruiting goals, the military is meeting its retention objectives and has a large pool of trained personnel in the reserves that it can draw on to augment its active forces. Additionally, while conscription is useful for producing large numbers of basically trained military personnel, it is not very useful for producing high skill specialists which the military often has the greatest need for: for example, intelligence analysts, linguists, special operations forces, civil affairs personnel, and pilots. These people need years of training and high motivation levels to become proficient in their military occupations. However, should reconstruction and counter-insurgency operations in Iraq require a major U.S. presence for a prolonged period of time, the utility of a draft might become a more active consideration. Such a mission could demand a large numbers of military personnel who do not require the more specialized skills. The draft might also be useful if Congress decided to dramatically expand the size of the Army over a short period of time. See also CRS Report RL31682, The Military Draft and a Possible War with Iraq , by [author name scrubbed] (pdf), for a more detailed discussion of arguments for and against a draft.

Summary:
This report provides short answers to commonly asked questions about military personnel, compensation, and force structure issues related to Operation Noble Eagle (ONE), Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF), and Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF). Operation Noble Eagle is the name given to military operations related to homeland security and support to federal, state, and local agencies in the wake of the September 11 attacks. Operation Enduring Freedom includes ongoing operations in Afghanistan, operations against terrorists in other countries, and training assistance to foreign militaries which are conducting operations against terrorists. Operation Iraqi Freedom includes the invasion of Iraq, the defeat of Saddam Hussein's regime, and the subsequent rebuilding and counter-insurgency operations in Iraq. The questions are grouped into three major thematic areas: personnel, compensation and force structure. The section on personnel addresses issues such as casualties, reserve mobilization, "sole surviving" son or daughter status, conscientious objection, and "stop-loss." The section on compensation addresses issues related to the pay and benefits--including casualty and death benefits--provided to members of the U.S. military participating in ONE/OEF/OIF and their families. The section on force structure addresses issues related to how ONE/OEF/OIF might affect the number of personnel needed by the military, and responds to common questions about whether a return to conscription is likely under current circumstances. This report will be updated as needed.