IN: This is an email
Ann, Attached is the memo AEC forward with ENA's responses redline. Please review. When you get AEC's response completed we probably should set up a conference call to discuss and finalize. Thanks.

What is the subject?

OUT: Master Firm Comments
QUESTION: Attached is a clean and red lined version of the loi. I'm expecting a call from David Hunt, so I haven't dealt with the limit of liability stuff yet. The Beck comments are good comments which we need to discuss internally, but since we haven't, I'm happy to take the position that the comments seem to fit better in the drafting of the definitive ageements. Kay
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: We need a good project name documents
Please read the following carefully and retain this information for use whenever you trade on Bloomberg: 1. Bloomberg charges a $15 FLAT broker fee. 2. This fee applies whether you are the aggressor or receiver of a trade. 3. This fee applies each time you make a trade on Bloomberg i.e. $15 per hit or lift, regardless of volume 4. When you extend a Bloomberg deal in Deal Entry, account for each separate trade accordingly by adding $15 to any existing broker fee. ****** 5. Because this fee is FLAT, select the "FLAT" button to the right of the broker fee. ***** 6. And most importantly, make a note in the "BROKER" box that the broker is in fact Bloomberg. I know that many of you were never notified of the Bloomberg fee structure, but going forward we should see every trade done on Bloomberg showing up in the system as having been done with Bloomberg. The Confirms group in Houston has compiled a weighty list of "missing" hourly trades since the advent of Real Time Bloomberg trading. I believe these are all in the system, but possibly short a broker name and fee. This, going forward, should no longer be a problem. Please let me know if you have any questions regarding Bloomberg trading and/or fees. Thanks,
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: Bloomberg Fees
Attached is the latest EEI contract for your review. If you have any changes you think should be incorporated, please let me know before the the 16th of November. As you all are aware, I have been working with EEI to come up with the definition of an "Into" product. I circulated a draft definition at the last EEI meeting. There will be a conference call on Tuesday Nov.9th from 230 to 430 to further discuss with EEI members. Let me know if you would like to participate. In the meanwhile if you have any comments on the draft Into definition I circulated, please get me our comments as soon as possible. I will be meeting with the traders later today to discuss with them. Thanks for everbody's help on this project. The end may be near.
Answer: EEI Update- Standardized Master Purchase and Sale Agreement and Into Definition Conference Call
Here is an email: Diane: attached is the redline redraft for the KCS trades. Please send to the usual suspects. These changes should apply to both confirms. Please make sure that Derek and Marshall receive as they are the ones who need to say OK.
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: KCS
QUESTION: Here is the report we've put together summarizing headcount by function and business unit. There are some changes from the figures Fin Ops had last week, mainly relating to EES (both 2001 forecast and 2002 Plan were off). Brian will coordinate with Fin Ops to ensure they reflect the same figures that we now show. There are two things that will be updated once we receive more information: 1) EES 2002 headcount will be increasing (Shelly Butler to provide as soon as they have it) 2) EBS forecast and plan headcount will be broken out by function - right now, we just have one number. Call me if you have any questions. Thanks,
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS:
Energy Ops Headcount Report