Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.

[EX Q]: I am INCENSED that Stephanie Dunx chose to write her "open letter" using the language of the patriarchal cismale colonist subjagators-- IN ENGLISH!

Even now, her fellow protestors speak this vile tongue, and with every word I am reminded of British holocausts, wars, and various terror campaigns throughout the ages.

Oh! Wait ! I did it!

I did it again! Auuuugh!*

(Apologies to a certain comedy group from a country I dare not mention)
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: True enough. Alas, for many conservatives the world can only be black or white, and Mr. Trump is Dubya on steroids. Not only are you "against me" if you're not "for me," you're a loser and stupid and (choose your Trump invective here). Hyperbole should no longer be tempered: Mr. Trump is a "leader" in the same vein as Hitler and Mussolini. Consistently deprecating (and increasingly openly violent toward) to those who not only disagree with him, but are doing their jobs (or not) as journalists. Not simply a cartoonish narcissistic blowhard, but a rallying point for the ignorant, angry and uninformed. There will be violence, and worse, coming from the Trump camp, I fear. The Republican party created this monster in 50 years since Nixon (both their racist, misogynist, homophobic "core" and the individual now leading them), and when you sleep with dogs, you get fleas. They have no idea where to scratch, which is both gratifyingly hilarious and frightening.
[EX A]: Yes

[EX Q]: Trump would be a disaster, but this letter sounds just like how some on the right talk about Obama as emperor, ruling by executive order.
[EX A]:
Yes