IN: This is an email
U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY NATIONAL EARTHQUAKE INFORMATION CENTER World Data Center for Seismology, Denver Reply to: sedas@neis.cr.usgs.gov or neic@usgs.gov The following is a release by the United States Geological Survey, National Earthquake Information Center: A major earthquake occurred NEAR THE COAST OF PERU about 70 miles (110 km) south-southwest of Arequipa at 3:38 AM MDT today, Jul 7, 2001 (4:38 AM local time in Peru). A PRELIMINARY MAGNITUDE OF 7.2 WAS COMPUTED FOR THIS EARTHQUAKE. The magnitude and location may be revised when additional data and further analysis results are available. This earthquake is an aftershock of the magnitude 8.4 event of June 23. No reports of damage or casualties have been received at this time; however, this earthquake may have caused substantial damage and casualties due to its location and size. EDIS-07-07-01 0451 PDT

What is the subject?

OUT: [EDIS] EQ MAG 7 2 NEAR COAST OF PERU [News: Statewide]

IN: This is an email
Recent Hires, Don't miss the opportunity to learn about: ? What success looks like at Enron ? What it means to be a good cultural fit at Enron ? What resources are available for you to use to enhance your job performance ? What is the PRC process at Enron Join us this Tuesday, June 12th from 11:45 AM to 2 PM @ EB49C1. An open Q&A session will occur during the last hour of the presentation. Lunch will not be served. You may bring your own lunch if you would like.

What is the subject?

OUT: New Hire Focus Series

IN: This is an email
Attached is a revised version of the CA with Goldman. The remaining issue is in Section 1 regarding restrictions on Goldman's "use" of the Confidential Information. Goldman believes that they will have to bring a lot of their personnel, including traders, "over the wall" in order to perform this engagement, and that such personnel will by necessity see some of our Confidential Information. While they agree that their personnel shouldn't be able to use our specific information against us in future transactions, they are worried that the restriction on their use of our info that is set out in Section 1 could limit the future activities of those folks simply because they "saw" some of our Confidential Information and are carrying it around in their heads, and at any time could be accused of "using" our info. Initially, Goldman insisted on removing the restriction on use. We have suggested the language at the end of Section , which would generally restrict use of the information to the engagement, but would allow Goldman's non-IB's to work on the deal but perform their other jobs without worrying about violating the CA as long as they weren't using the notes that they took while they were in our shop. Admittedly, it is not as clean as I would like, but I think this adequately addresses both parties' concerns. Goldman was initially receptive to this language, and will call tomorrow morning with any other comments.

What is the subject?

OUT:
Goldman CA