In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: Essentially he was a no show, if compared to how other presidents had participated. And I believe that at one of the prayer breakfasts he insulted Christians, did he not? Can you do better than that example? Something in the Denver Post, for example.

Output: Non-obscene

Input: Consider Input: Comment: So, we create a crap shoot lottery to fund education? Along with closing 1-2 Pioneer Homes (to save money) and throwing seniors out on the street, if I as I suspect many have no place else to go? All to protect the wealthy from paying into a balanced an progressive tax plan? Is this truly the kind of state we as a collective wish to create? How much lower can our Republican lead Senate drop to?

I have no kids to educate nor do I have any family or anyone I know living in a Pioneer Home (so I have no stake in this), but I do know that I am willing to pay into a progressive income and/or sales tax within a balanced plan to insure that seniors are housed and that your kids are educated.

This is about creating a common sense, responsible, balanced, and compassionate Alaskan society for all, not an everyone for themselves, statewide dystopia.

This is not fiscal responsibility; this is fiscal idiocy.

Output: Obscene

Input: Consider Input: Comment: Pastor Schultz is more interested in becoming a "politcal activist" than preaching the word of God. During our Sunday services at First Presbyterian Church, he has been a Trump basher since the election began. He claimed Donald Trump was unqualified to be President because of his comments toward women. Yet, Schultz never mentioned Hillary defending Bill Clinton during his sexual rampage while he was Governor of Arkansas and U. S. President, which included rape. The bottom line is Schultz is just another mouth piece for people like Nancy Pelosi, Chuck Schumer, and George Soros. It's expected, so who cares! Maybe if Matt had an experience in "Harm's Way" like many of those in our military, he would have a different outlook on life regarding terrorists. Sadly, he has lived a sheltered life and hides behind the Bible with his political comments!
Output: Non-obscene