Problem: Well, the strongest First Amendment argument is about the retrospective extension, because of a fundamental change that occurs when Congress extends subsisting copyrights, rather than when Congress legislates prospectively. When Congress legislates prospectively, it has no way to know who's going to benefit from its extension.

Based on the paragraph above can we conclude that "Most people believe that the retrospective extension is the strongest First Amendment argument"?

A: It's impossible to say

Problem: Fashion Magazine<br>Kate went with her mom to the grocery store. Her mother had given her five dollars to buy snacks. The magazine rack caught her eye on the way to the cookie isle. She liked all the pictures of the pretty clothes. In the end she decided to buy the magazine and skip the snacks.

Based on the paragraph above can we conclude that "she was originally shopping for cookies"?

A: Yes

Problem: OSLO Feb 22 The Norwegian government does not plan to cut its stake in Statoil, oil and energy Minister Terje Soeviknes told parliament on Wednesday. The government holds a 67 percent stake in the oil firm. There are no plans to cut the government's stakes in fertiliser maker Yara, aluminium maker Norsk Hydro or top bank DNB, industry Minister Monica Maeland said. (Reporting by Terje Solsvik, editing by Nerijus Adomaitis)

Based on the paragraph above can we conclude that "The Norwegian government hasn't made its mind up about Statoil."?

A:
No