Question:
Based on the premise "As the Senate report ", can we conclude that "Senate works hard on reports"? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
it is not possible to tell

Question: Sentence A: sometimes it dips all the way down to you folks down in Texas and then it roars back up the east coast here by the time we get it it is hauling some cold weather

Sentence B: It also dips all the way down to people in Oklahoma, which is north of Texas.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question: It's built on undulating land that radiates out from a fishing harbor where a small fleet still moors and sells its catch.
There is no fishing allowed.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Problem: Here is a premise:
For criteria pollutants, the 1996 National Emissions Inventory (NEI) used for the Heavy Duty Diesel vehicle rulemaking was used.

Here is a hypothesis:
To select which pollutants would be used related to HDD vehicles the 1996 NEI was referenced.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Sentence 1: yeah so that that's sort of close enough

Sentence 2: That's close enough to Chicago.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Premise:
"Imagine if Michael Lasky, the former racing handicapper who ran Inphomation into the ground, had seen two years ago that margins were going to decline, that in the absence of any professional requirements more and more psychics would be entering the market, that the time for infomercials had passed, and that the Psychic Friends brand name had hit its peak."
Hypothesis: Michael Lasky thought ahead and steered his business in the right direction before the market changed.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
no