Question:
Based on the premise "every time you drink Scotch you're paying Kennedys", can we conclude that "The Kennedys must be rich because so much Scotch is drank."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
it is not possible to tell

Question: Sentence A: And the law will then seize your property, like your Pentium Pro, your ISDN card, and your Jaz drive.

Sentence B: The law has a right to grab anything you own.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question: Liberals think more job training could help.
Some people think more job training could help.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Problem: Here is a premise:
The New York Times highlighted three prizes won by the New York Times . Eventually, all three papers got around to acknowledging that the Grand Forks Herald had won the top prize for its coverage of last year's North Dakota floods and fires.

Here is a hypothesis:
The Grand Forks Herald covered North Dakota's floods and fires.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Sentence 1: okay did it work out your first time all right

Sentence 2: You first time went horribly.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: no

Premise:
"and so many things like that so they were"
Hypothesis: There were a lot of similar objects to choose from
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
it is not possible to tell