The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.

Context: 'That sounds awesome - I'm sure we can come to an agreement on how to allocate that works for both of us. ' 'I agree that we will! I do love having food as well. Have lots of people coming.' 'I'm not as keen on food, so how does this sound. I get 2 firewood, 2 waters, and 1 food. You will get 2 food, 1 firewood, and 1 water. '
Utterance: 'Hmm, you're getting my top item there though. That still might work.'
No

Context: 'What do you need the extra water for?' 'With the extra food I need I will need extra water also. How about I only take 1 extra water? ' 'So are you okay with you getting 2 food, 1 water, and 1 firewood and me getting 1 food, 2 water and 2 firewood? I'll do that deal.'
Utterance: 'That should work. I will conserve with my water and I should be fine. So we have a deal? '
Yes

Context: 'That sounds fair. The kids can bathe in the stream. We are good with 2 food packs.' 'Lol, wish i could. Then you take all 3 of the firewood, I'll take 2 of the Water and 1 of the food, sound good?' 'Just to be clear, I get 3 firewoods, 1 water and 1 food. You get 0 firewood, 2 waters and 2 food packs?'
Utterance: 'Everything sounds good except you and your family take 2 of the food, i need to lose weight anyway.'
No