Premise:
"The most pressing need for pro bono are for asylum applicants, she says. "
Hypothesis: 'Having a lawyer provided free of charge is very important to asylum seekers looking to flee oppressive regimes', she said.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

it is not possible to tell

input question: The omission of long-term impacts accounts for approximately 40 percent reduction in the estimate of avoided premature mortality in the Alternative Estimate relative to the Base Estimate. If this premise is true, does that tell us:"They included the long-term impacts."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: no

Question:
Based on the premise "and so obviously it didn't work in California", can we conclude that "It did not work in California."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
yes

Question: Sentence A: LSC's work with NLADA continues on many fronts.

Sentence B: LSC is satisfied with the partnership.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question: And what did he say?
What did he say?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Problem: Here is a premise:
It happened in the late 1960s, when state and local officials embarked on a campaign to encourage welfare and food-stamp use--to remove stigma and boost participation rates.

Here is a hypothesis:
State and local officials began a campaign to encourage welfare use in the late 1960s.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer:
yes