Question:
Based on the premise " Nema squealed in delight.", can we conclude that "Nema let out an excited squeal of delight. "? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
yes

Question: Sentence A: But Christianity eventually triumphed to achieve the strong Orthodoxy of today, and Titus became Crete's patron saint.

Sentence B: Titus is the patron saint of Crete.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Question: i mean i i it it a lot there're a lot so many different songs i mean like the whole thing about cover versions a lot of times i mean i've heard some songs that that i just thought were horrendous cover versions and i'm like you know i i don't wanna listen to this because you know you think of the original it's like you know oh that was really great that was a you know
The speaker thinks that some covers of songs are not as good as the original song.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Problem: Here is a premise:
To reap the full benefits of information management reform, federal agencies must utilize the full potential of CIOs as information management leaders and active participants in the development of agency strategic plans and policies.

Here is a hypothesis:
It's necessary for federal agencies to make use of CIOs to develop agency plans and policies.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Sentence 1: It said that cancellation of President Clinton's planned visit to India this fall would be disastrous and only intensify nationalist fervor in that country.

Sentence 2: President Clinton actually canceled her trip to India.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Premise:
"Isn't it all panning out beautifully? "
Hypothesis: Aren't you horrified by the way it concluded?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
no