Premise:
"And yet (no doubt largely because congressional Republicans were overplaying their hand), the public gave Clinton more support than had ever been enjoyed by Richard Nixon (personal 67 percent) or even Ronald Reagan (personal 68 percent--mass adulation of Ronald Reagan being a largely retrospective phenomenon)."
Hypothesis: The president was the most hated person in their country.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

no

input question: uh we are latecomers my husband and i to the world of golf we started when we were both oh i would imagine he was fifty years old so we've not been at the game that long but we love it If this premise is true, does that tell us:"We didn't golf until after fifty."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: yes

Question:
Based on the premise "Can't you pay somebody else to stay up all night to keep a lid on his, er, excesses?", can we conclude that "There has to be someone who would be willing to cover up for him."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
it is not possible to tell

Question: Sentence A: Editorialists admired and reviled his diabolical shrewdness.

Sentence B: Editorialists dismissed him as a nobody and did not write about him.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question: Ca'daan grew nervous, would they fight?
Ca'daan pondered if they would fight; if they did, his host would have to quit the field and regroup.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Problem: Here is a premise:
The Distribution of Inbound Mailby Weight Interval.

Here is a hypothesis:
The Distribution of Inbound Mailby Weight Interval is exactly the type of sentence that will get you slapped.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer:
it is not possible to tell