The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.

[Q]: Context: 'I too have the same issue. I am also asking for children only , better you could accept 1 food , 2 water and 3 firewood, I hope this deal will work out for you' 'I need at least 2 food packages and at least 1 water. I can live with out any extra firewood.' 'Please do understand my situation its very very critical to give 2 food packages to you.Instead you can take 3 waters and firewood too.'
Utterance: 'No that will not work for me given that I have 4 growing children of different ages who eat like adults. I need at least 2 food packages and 1 water. That gives you 1 food package and 2 waters and 3 firewoods.'
[A]: Yes

[Q]: Context: 'Hmm. Maybe we could go out together on a run. 🙂Always nice to have a running partner. So maybe on the water you get 2, me 1. Then on the Firewood the opposite?' 'That would be fun! I feel like I always do better when I have someone to run against. Competition does me good. That sounds fantastic on the fire wood and water split. What is your food situation looking like??' 'How about this? 2 for you and 1 for me. Going low carb and mostly brought my own. What do you think? '
Utterance: 'That sounds great! I don't think my chances for catching any fish are pretty slim!'
[A]: No

[Q]: Context:
Utterance: 'I am so excited to go camping! I am planning a nice long walk in the woods to decompress from the hectic days of working.'
[A]:
No