Problem: Here is a premise:
Congress also for the first time explicitly added H-2A workers to the categories of aliens eligible for legal assistance under the LSC appropriations act, although that assistance remained limited to claims under the workers' employment contract.

Here is a hypothesis:
Congress removed H-2A workers from the list of those eligible for legal assistance.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Sentence 1: Again the Kentuckian was teased by a scrap of memory.

Sentence 2: Again, the Kentuckian had a fleeting glimpse of a memory.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: yes

Question:
yeah yeah my wife and i have a a three year old almost four and a and a two year old so we're looking at uh the older one going to school next year not not well not this coming fall but the year after that and the year

Does it follow that "My wife and I do not plan to send our kids to school."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
no

Q: If With good humor and icy elegance ..., can we say that "With bad humor and no elegance."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A: no

Premise:
"you know a beef and broccoli or chicken or chicken and broccoli or something like that you know chicken and cashews and she orders um bean curd"
Hypothesis: You don't know the beef and broccoli do you?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

no

Sentence 1: In its own way, it establishes a hold over you soothing, lulling, and always fascinating and before you know it, you're hooked.

Sentence 2: With its own method, it creates a hold on you and suddenly you are hooked.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer:
yes