In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

Ex Input:
Comment: I guess Terry Frei's little racist twitter rant against Sato doesn't get reported at the Denver Post, eh? His "apology," and plug for his book,was even more lame. He needs to apologize to Takuma Sato through his column and he needs to publicly address his issues in the paper. Frankly, if I were his editor, he would have been summarily fired by now. So, you are going to monitor whether or not my complaint about his racist tweet is civil? LOL

Ex Output:
Non-identity-attack

Ex Input:
Comment: Why do people that have never even read Marx always comment on him first.? sad those sorts... always think with their guts instead of their heads.

Ex Output:
Non-identity-attack

Ex Input:
Comment: It is too early to know details and a motive, however at first glance it looks like the English have started fighting back. I personally consider Muslims in the same category as a rabid skunk. They are both dangerous and unpredictable. One thing for sure is Muslims either kill or watch you be killed. They will never come to your defense. They are brainwashed as children by their Quran which demands that they lie about their intentions until they are in great enough numbers to kill or enslave the infidels as the Quran tells them to. Mohammed their prophet was a pedophile and a mass murder. Islam does not fit my definition of religion. Does your religion ordered you to kill or enslave people not of your religion? Is it ok to lie about your true intentions? If you answered no then you are a civilized person and Islamophobia is common sense,

Ex Output:
Identity-attack