Part 1. Definition
In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.
Part 2. Example
Comment: President lied under oath about consensual sex...
Not the same thing as rape.
Answer: Sexual-explicit
Explanation: This comment explicitly mentions "consensual sex" and "rape", and thus is sexual-explicit.
Part 3. Exercise
Comment: This is a good article and lays the blame exactly where the blame belongs. However to underestimate the audacity of Zuma and his lack of moral compass and the effect he has had on the economy is also being blind to the pure evil of the man who has surrounded himself with people who are constitutional delinquents. Nelson Mandela was also ANC, but had the capacity to recognise that the communist philosophy vaunted in the bush was not going to get the ANC near the seats of power and the bush war was no longer tenable because their Soviet supporters had bitten the dust. He along with the old guard brokered a good deal for themselves that led to the depredations of a Zuma. One would imagine they would would continue in good faith, but have through their ineptitude, malice and corruption scuppered the economy and the hopes of millions. Suddenly demanding the constitution be scrapped because they are no longer powerless except when it comes to ability, is sheer perfidy.
Answer:
Non-sexual-explicit