Detailed Instructions: Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
Problem:All window dressing. Trying to lure a few rational republicans back into the fold to keep the party from completely melting down. Problem is, the same element that is cheering for Trump still calls themselves republicans. This election is already in the bag for the dems. The best the repubs can do is make a reach with Ryan in 2020, if the party survives.

Plenty to not like about Clinton. I don't plan to vote for her. But Trump is so bad that you'd have to hate America to vote for him. Time to vote for a third party candidate. If they get enough votes they may get to play in the 2020 sandbox. Wouldn't the debates be a lot more interesting with a third perspective on the stage?

The congressional elections are sure going to be interesting for the next couple cycles...
Solution:
Yes