input question: Haggling with dapper Gujaratis and the bright-eyed Kashmiris can attain the level of high art. If this premise is true, does that tell us:"Haggling is practiced by every merchant in the area."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: it is not possible to tell

Question:
Based on the premise " Si, amigo , so it is done in Kentucky and Virginia.", can we conclude that "No my enemy, it's not performed anywhere."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
no

Question: Sentence A: and and unfortunately and i think cocaine's a a good example it's it's just so much easier to just do some more do some more and then before you know it you know you're you're always doing it

Sentence B: Cocaine is not addictive.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question: Israeli forces then penetrated north to bombard PLO positions in Beirut.
Israeli forces moved north to Beirut to bomb the PLO.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Problem: Here is a premise:
In comparison to the reference case, Scenario D (adapting the CEF Advanced Case assumptions) reflects a national commitment to improve both electricity supply and the efficiency of demandside technologies.

Here is a hypothesis:
Scenario D reflects no commitments by governments or utilities nationally, and instead focuses on regional trends and macro-changes.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question:
but the US also makes a lot of uh you know treaties with other people like saying okay if you give up then you can come live in our country and we'll take care of you like Marcos right

Does it follow that "The treaties that U.S. makes are not the best thing for the country."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
it is not possible to tell