Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.

Input: Consider Input: ok...the story is strange. the story is ironic. the story tells of what these people did...thinking it was a good idea. the story tells of the fail. one can laugh at a situation. this story has the elements of amusing. we read amusing stories everyday. the guy trading a monkey and girl scout money for sex...another guy falls through a ceiling - twice ...the second time being in front of a witness. another guy has kiddie porn on his cell and then goes to claim it after being aware that the cops were aware. another guy has his kid shoot him in the leg for insurance money and then loses his leg..... is this not funny because she asked to be shot?

Output: Yes

Input: Consider Input: This doctor sounds like a legit man with a "World View" attitude toward varying political climates. His use of opiates is actually quite sound, and opiates are the most relied on pain management method for thousands of years-simple fact. The other thing is plainly clear-the US govt has attacked the ability of Drs. and clinics to effectively treat pain, without fear of "doing the wrong thing" as one doctor specifically described it to me. If a guy gets a minor injury the doctors are scared to even hand out 3 low strength painkillers. I am not quite sure the motivation here because I think it would benefit the US govt far more for having the masses addicted as can be. Lining their own pockets thru medical service/product in the USA anyway....but the doc is still ON POINT with his approach-this STINKS of a witch hunt.

Output: No

Input: Consider Input: That is not a death caused by spice. Rape is already against the law. What is your point?
Output: Yes