Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.

Q: Boy, I seem to have gotten under your skin. No one is buying your pathetic attempt to tar my motives. My track record is too well known as a PITA of bad developers. You need to go lie down and let your heart rate come back to normal. Then read my piece again as a _true_ example of citing documented facts. You could learn a few things. -- Paul

A: No
****
Q: You are stating the same sort of conspiracy theory that supporters of the occupiers have been making online in countless discussion forums. These are extremist anti-government hate groups, and are no different than Islamic terrorists with regarding to the irrationality of their thinking. Back on Feb 2nd, it was announced that the investigation into Finicum's shooting would not be done until early to mid March. The investigation is being headed by the Deschutes County Sheriff's office, with assistance from the Bend and Redmond police departments.

Yet, you attempt to make some sort of anti-government conspiracy out of this investigation, when it is being handled normally according to established protocols. You need to spend more time reading real news, and stop listening to all of the nonsense on these anti-government websites.

http://www.oregonlive.com/oregon-standoff/2016/02/investigation_into_death_of_or.html

A: No
****
Q: I'd argue that month to month and no lease rentals aren't compatible with housing security, and are being used by people in situations in which they aren't appropriate. I think stories in this piece, and all the protests about no-cause evictions are direct evidence of this.

How do we respond to that problem without nudging tenants and landlords alike into longer term leases?

A:
Yes
****