Problem: Here is a premise:
They were a noble people once, they just never found the weapons to match us.

Here is a hypothesis:
They were noble, but never found the weapons to match us.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Sentence 1: The ideal, Prudie thinks, is choosing a gift with some real thought behind it that does not break the bank.

Sentence 2: The perfect gift should be the most expensive one as well.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: no

Question:
The divisions resulted in Veneto (Venice and its hinterland), Emilia (between Ravenna and Modena), and Pentapolo (between Rimini and Perugia), plus Rome and Naples (with Sicily and Calabria).

Does it follow that "The split caused Veneto, Pentapolo, also Rome and Naples."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
yes

Q: If You were in fact offering it, as you'll see if you go back to the original, not as a considered characterization of my views, but as a way of introducing your own traditional/cultural explanation., can we say that "If you go back and look, you'll see that you offered it in order to introduce your own explanation."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A: yes

Premise:
"These the health and environmental benefits of reducing mercury accumulation in fish and other wildlife"
Hypothesis: Mercury is not a health issue.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

no

Sentence 1: This Moorish palace formed part of the city wall.

Sentence 2: The city wall was constructed far from this Moorish palace.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer:
no