In this task, You are given a review of Amazon's food products. Your task is to divide them into two classes: negative or positive, depending on the content of the review.

Example input: These are junk! Both bulbs have burned out within a two month period!! I cannot believe that this company can be in business with such poor quality. I have used infrared lights for my ball python for many years now and I get a varied range of months from a bulb, but I have never gone through two bulbs in a matter of two months! I am very disappointed.
Example output: negative
Example explanation: The user seems very disappointed in the product. Because the bulb they ordered has been burned out earlier than usual. So, it's a negative review.
Q: Some of the best, coherent, concise writing and reasoning I've seen from a scientist. One of the most brilliant men I have had the pleasure of discovering. I recommended to an atheist friend of mine who told me Sanford is right after reading just the first two chapters of his book. He is still atheist, so if you have preconceived notions about this book and the author and his worthiness of your time I suggest you put your pride aside - if Sanford is right it has serious implications for your worldview and nearly everything you've been taught about our world, life, and yourself. Don't be afraid of the possibility that what we have been taught is wrong put that ego aside and just read
A:
positive