In this task, you will be presented with a context from an academic paper and a question separated with a
. You have to answer the question based on the context.

The 16 classes are inspired by the OntoNotes5 corpus BIBREF7 as well as the ACE (Automatic Content Extraction) English Annotation Guidelines for Entities Version 6.6 2008.06.13 BIBREF8.
Question: How did they determine the distinct classes?
inspired by the OntoNotes5 corpus BIBREF7 as well as the ACE (Automatic Content Extraction) English Annotation Guidelines for Entities Version 6.6 2008.06.13 BIBREF8

The focus of this section is on recently published datasets and LID research applicable to the South African context. An in depth survey of algorithms, features, datasets, shared tasks and evaluation methods may be found in BIBREF0.

The datasets for the DSL 2015 & DSL 2017 shared tasks BIBREF1 are often used in LID benchmarks and also available on Kaggle . The recently published JW300 parallel corpus BIBREF2 covers over 300 languages with around 100 thousand parallel sentences per language pair on average. The WiLI-2018 benchmark dataset BIBREF4 for monolingual written natural language identification includes around 1000 paragraphs of 235 languages. The NCHLT text corpora BIBREF7 is likely a good starting point for a shared LID task dataset for the South African languages BIBREF8.
Question: Which datasets are employed for South African languages LID?
DSL 2015 DSL 2017 JW300 parallel corpus NCHLT text corpora

he first dataset (WIKI) was the same set of 200 sentences from Wikipedia used in BIBREF7 . The second dataset (SCI) was a set of 220 sentences from the scientific literature. We sourced the sentences from the OA-STM corpus. In total 2247 triples were extracted. In total, 11262 judgements were obtained after running the annotation process.
Question: What is the size of the released dataset?
440 sentences, 2247 triples extracted from those sentences, and 11262 judgements on those triples.