IN: This is an email
This is the first draft of the planning document for the simulation to be held next Thursday - 02/07/02. I will continue forwarding the revised copies of this draft as it changes. Please let Bob Shults, Carl Carter, or myself know of any additions or revisions you would like to suggest on behalf of your group. Regards,

What is the subject?

OUT: Simulation for www.UBSWenergy.com - Draft document (01/31/02)
QUESTION: Sorry I didn't get a chance to buy you a beer last night - we got there late. I owe you one. Hope you had a great birthday.
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: I owe you one...
Following last week's meeting, here is my recommendation on how to proceed with SCE. 1. Form Enron Negotiation Team My recommendation is to use the same team we used with PG&E + Jeff Dasovich. My understanding was that Lisa M. was the lead negotiator - I would not change this. Jeff should only be there to make introductions. 2. Meet & Confer (10/29) Sue Mara and Jeff Dasovich will listen and report back to everyone on what happens. 3. Reformed Stipulation I would propose that we take a wait and see approach to this document. Based on Dasovich's idea to get together with SCE on Thursday, maybe let this ride. 4. Meeting My understanding is that (Jeff D. please correct) SCE can meet with us this Thursday. Can everyone make it that needs to be there? Probably meet in California. We should put the laundry list on the table. Please let me know what else we need to discuss or if anyone disagrees. Thanks,
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: Proposed SCE Negotiation Strategy
Please see attached a United Way Contribution Summary by Business Unit as of Wednesday morning, August 10. This summary includes the total contribution amount to date, percent participation, campaign goal, and percent of goal for each business unit, as well as the functional groups within your business units. Currently we are at 77%, or $2.25M, of our financial goal with only 42% participation. These numbers are still significantly lower than where we were this time last year and we continue to need your help! If you will do the following throughout the remainder of the campaign, I know it would help exceed our goal of $2.9M. ? Continue to send out reminder emails including the United Way link ? Continue to have personal dialogue with your direct reports and those in your group Please let me know if you have any questions regarding this report or the campaign in general. Thank you for your participation and support of this year's campaign.
Answer: UPDATED UNITED WAY REPORT
Here is an email: please add Fred Lagrasta Vice President for signature authority for ENA Upstream Company, LLC effective immediately. This is pursuant to the restructuring of ENA UPstream and producer wellhead groups sent in a memo to ENA employees 10/24. If you have any questions or comments, please let me know. lisa 5 4766
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: signature authority for ena upstream
QUESTION: Rick, I wanted to summarize for you my budget meeting with Michael on Wed. I will send you the whole pack under separate cover, but here are the highlights: Relatively speaking, it was constructive - he has made unequivical cut demands of other groups Original (adjusted) headcount budget for 2001 was 52, he is asking me to freeze heads at current 44 which includes: not replacing recent leaver - Karin Levin not replacing scheduled Houston rotation - Oliver Harrison Scheduled new arrrivals - John Collenette, Karl Sees, Blair Van Zant, Adam Bauer, Michel Gantois Tracy Ngo, plus 5 new in last month. 2002 budget looks much larger than 2001, despite lower headcount due to: $1.6MM increase due to full costing of expats @ salary plus 4x salary (instead of just salary) $500k for communications allocated increase in benefit costs from 10% to 23% All other expenses lowered - Budget not finalized. Michael requested: reduce Travel by a significant amount ($100k?) get more precise justification of allocations from RAC Corp - Credit - $350k looks a little low (includes you, bill, debbie, credit reserve,CAS..) Market - $660 looks a little high/ok UndWr - $499 looks too high Portfolio - $108 ?? be prepared to shed under 2 scenarios a) 5 heads b) 10 heads 5 heads can be accomodated with little change in service, provided we continue to shed 'operational' credit responsibility and the current low level of large underwritten transactions and revals. Specific coverage holes and weakness will continue to be: EBS, German speaking credit person, depth in international markets, depth in market risk management. 10 heads would be quite disruptive and my recommendation would be to re-assess the role of RAC with an eye towards much less process work and immunity from finger pointing. Budget to be finalized a more comprehensive business review is completed over the coming few weeks. Perhaps we can discuss next week after you have reviewed. Ted
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS:
2002 Budget