TASK DEFINITION: In this task, you are given a passage which has a question and the context. You have to generate an answer to the question based on the information present in the context.
PROBLEM: Context: In diabetics with end-stage renal disease (ESRD), risk of death has been reported to be non-constant after the first dialysis, and different outcomes have been observed between genders. We assessed the impact of type 2 diabetes (T2DM) on mortality in dialysis regarding its differential effect by gender using time-dependent analyses.', 'All T2DM and non-diabetic (no-DM) patients who started dialysis in two renal units in Lyon, France, between January 1, 1995, and December 31, 2007, were included. In multivariate analyses, the Cox model and Shoenfeld residual approach were used to assess the effect of T2DM on dialysis mortality by gender.', 'We included 235 T2DM (males: 57.9%) and 480 no-DM (males: 65.6%) patients. In males, the adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) for death in T2DM versus no-DM was 0.83 (p = 0.20) and was constant over time after the first renal replacement therapy (RRT) (p = 0.88). In females, aHR for death in T2DM versus no-DM patients was not constant over time (p = 0.002). It was 0.64 (p = 0.13) within the first year after the first RRT and 2.10 (p = 0.002) after the first year. Evolutions with time of these aHR by gender were significantly different (p = 0.009).\Question: Does the Impact of type 2 diabetes on mortality in end-stage renal disease patients differ between genders?

SOLUTION: T2DM was associated with death only in females. This association was not constant over time after the first dialysis.

PROBLEM: Context: The modern multimodality therapeutic approach to Wilms tumor (WT), combining surgery with radiotherapy and chemotherapy results in high cure rates even for high stage disease. However, the combination of radiotherapy and chemotherapy is associated with severe early and late complications such as neutropenic sepsis, growth retardation and secondary malignancies. Therefore, novel therapeutic strategies, which would decrease the treatment burden, are required. We studied the expression of erbB2 growth factor receptor in WT cells as well as its role as a tumor therapeutic target in an in vivo xenograft model of Wilms tumor.', 'Paraffin embedded pathological samples from 14 different WT cases as well as xenografts derived thereof were immunostained with anti-erbB2 monoclonal antibody. The immunostaining was graded in comparison to a known positive control (breast cancer) and was scored by the intensity of staining (0 to +3) multiplied by the percentage of cells expressing the antigen. The expression of erbB2 in the human WT xenograft was verified also by fluorescence activated cell sorter analysis. In addition, nude mice bearing established subcutaneous human WT xenografts were treated with either 3 intraperitoneal injections of N29 anti-erbB2 monoclonal antibody or irrelevant antibody.', 'All of the authentic human pathological samples, except 1 anaplastic WT as well the WT xenografts (at different stages), expressed erbB2. Expression was also observed in WT metastasis and in tumors which out grew chemotherapy. Systemic administration of anti-erbB2 monoclonal antibody inhibited and even prevented the growth of WT xenograft in vivo.\Question: Is erbB2 a tumor associated antigen and a suitable therapeutic target in Wilms tumor?

SOLUTION: ErbB2 is a tumor associated antigen in WT. Being expressed in almost all tumor stages, our in vivo model suggests that erbB2 may serve as a WT therapeutic target. Further work is needed to establish the role of erbB2 in the disease and its potential use in decreasing current treatment burden.

PROBLEM: Context: It has been speculated that invasive revascularization prevents development of cardiogenic shock. Data from randomised trials comparing angioplasty with fibrinolysis on the development of cardiogenic shock are lacking.', 'To elucidate the effect of angioplasty on in-hospital development of cardiogenic shock compared to fibrinolysis. To evaluate whether mortality in patients who develop cardiogenic shock after treatment is dependent on revascularization strategy.', 'DANAMI-2 randomly assigned 1572 STEMI patients to fibrinolysis (782 patients) or angioplasty (790 patients). Data on patients with in-hospital development of cardiogenic shock after randomisation were included. Of the 103 patients (6.6%) patients developing cardiogenic shock 57% were randomised to angioplasty with an unadjusted odds ratio of 1.39 (0.92-2.11, p=0.14). During the three year follow-up 58% of the total mortality was due to cardiogenic shock, and treatment strategy did not influence the risk associated with shock (hazard ratio of 1.05 (0.67-1.64) for angioplasty vs. fibrinolysis).\Question: Does percutaneous coronary intervention for acute MI prevent in-hospital development of cardiogenic shock compared to fibrinolysis?

SOLUTION:
Angioplasty does not prevent the in-hospital development of cardiogenic shock complicating acute MI compared to fibrinolysis. Cardiogenic shock is still the leading cause of death in patients hospitalised for acute MI. There was no difference in mortality, with regards to treatment strategy in patients developing cardiogenic shock after the initial treatment.