In this task, you are given text for US Congressional and California state bills, your task is to generate a summary for this bill.
One example: SECTION 1. LIABILITY OF BUSINESS ENTITIES PROVIDING USE OF FACILITIES
TO NONPROFIT ORGANIZATIONS.

(a) Definitions.--In this section:
(1) Business entity.--The term ''business entity'' means a
firm, corporation, association, partnership, consortium, joint
venture, or other form of enterprise.
(2) Facility.--The term ''facility'' means any real
property, including any building, improvement, or appurtenance.
(3) Gross negligence.--The term ''gross negligence'' means
voluntary and conscious conduct by a person with knowledge (at
the time of the conduct) that the conduct is likely to be
harmful to the health or well-being of another person.
(4) Intentional misconduct.--The term ''intentional
misconduct'' means conduct by a person with knowledge (at the
time of the conduct) that the conduct is harmful to the health
or well-being of another person.
(5) Nonprofit organization.--The term ''nonprofit
organization'' means--
(A) any organization described in section 501(c)(3)
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and exempt from
tax under section 501(a) of such Code; or
(B) any not-for-profit organization organized and
conducted for public benefit and operated primarily for
charitable, civic, educational, religious, welfare, or
health purposes.
(6) State.--The term ''State'' means each of the several
States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto
Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, the Northern
Mariana Islands, any other territory or possession of the
United States, or any political subdivision of any such State,
territory, or possession.
(b) Limitation on Liability.--
(1) In general.--Subject to subsection (c), a business
entity shall not be subject to civil liability relating to any
injury or death occurring at a facility of the business entity
in connection with a use of such facility by a nonprofit
organization if--
(A) the use occurs outside of the scope of business
of the business entity;
(B) such injury or death occurs during a period
that such facility is used by the nonprofit
organization; and
(C) the business entity authorized the use of such
facility by the nonprofit organization.
(2) Application.--This subsection shall apply--
(A) with respect to civil liability under Federal
and State law; and
(B) regardless of whether a nonprofit organization
pays for the use of a facility.
(c) Exception for Liability.--Subsection (b) shall not apply to an
injury or death that results from an act or omission of a business
entity that constitutes gross negligence or intentional misconduct,
including any misconduct that--
(1) constitutes a crime of violence (as that term is
defined in section 16 of title 18, United States Code) or act
of international terrorism (as that term is defined in section
2331 of title 18) for which the defendant has been convicted in
any court;
(2) constitutes a hate crime (as that term is used in the
Hate Crime Statistics Act (28 U.S.C. 534 note));
(3) involves a sexual offense, as defined by applicable
State law, for which the defendant has been convicted in any
court; or
(4) involves misconduct for which the defendant has been
found to have violated a Federal or State civil rights law.
(d) Superseding Provision.--
(1) In general.--Subject to paragraph (2) and subsection
(e), this Act preempts the laws of any State to the extent that
such laws are inconsistent with this Act, except that this Act
shall not preempt any State law that provides additional
protection from liability for a business entity for an injury
or death with respect to which conditions under subparagraphs
(A) through (C) of subsection (b)(1) apply.
(2) Limitation.--Nothing in this Act shall be construed to
supersede any Federal or State health or safety law.
(e) Election of State Regarding Nonapplicability.--This Act shall
not apply to any civil action in a State court against a business
entity in which all parties are citizens of the State if such State
enacts a statute--
(1) citing the authority of this subsection;
(2) declaring the election of such State that this Act
shall not apply to such civil action in the State; and
(3) containing no other provision.
Solution is here: Shields a business entity from civil liability relating to any injury or death occurring at a facility of that entity in connection with a use of such facility by a nonprofit organization if: (1) the use occurs outside the scope of business of the business entity; (2) such injury or death occurs during a period that such facility is used by such organization; and (3) the business entity authorized the use of such facility by the organization.
Makes this Act inapplicable to an injury or death that results from an act or omission of a business entity that constitutes gross negligence or intentional misconduct, including misconduct that: (1) constitutes a hate crime or a crime of violence or act of international terrorism for which the defendant has been convicted in any court; or (2) involves a sexual offense for which the defendant has been convicted in any court or misconduct for which the defendant has been found to have violated a Federal or State civil rights law.
Preempts State laws to the extent that such laws are inconsistent with this Act, except State law that provides additional protection from liability. Specifies that this Act shall not be construed to supersede any Federal or State health or safety law.
Makes this Act inapplicable to any civil action in a State court against a business entity in which all parties are citizens of the State if such State, citing this Act's authority and containing no other provision, enacts a statute declaring the State's election that this Act shall not apply to such action in the State.
Explanation: This Bill focuses on shielding business entities from civil liability relating to an injury or death depending on the conditions of injury, hence the generated summary is correct.

Now, solve this: SECTION 1. SETTLEMENT OF CLAIMS OF THE WYANDOTTE NATION.

(a) Findings.--Congress finds the following:
(1) The Wyandotte Nation has a valid interest in certain
lands located in the Fairfax Business District in Wyandotte
County, Kansas, that are located within the Nation's
reservation established pursuant to an agreement between the
Wyandotte Nation and the Delaware Nation dated December 14,
1843, which agreement was ratified by the Senate on July 25,
1848.
(2) The Wyandotte Nation filed a lawsuit, Wyandotte Nation
v. Unified Government of Kansas City and Wyandotte County,
Kansas, U.S. D.C. Kan., Case No. 012303-CM, against certain
landowners within the Fairfax Business District to ascertain
and adjudicate ownership of lands that were once owned and held
in trust by the United States for the benefit of the Wyandotte
Nation but were not conveyed to the United States by the
Wyandotte Nation pursuant to the Treaty of January 31, 1855.
(3) The Lawsuit also contends that certain major roads in
Kansas City encroach upon a certain parcel of land, known as
the Huron Cemetery, which was reserved for the Wyandotte Nation
in the Treaty of January 31, 1855.
(4) The pendency of this Lawsuit has resulted in severe
economic hardships for the residents of the Fairfax Business
District of Wyandotte County, Kansas, by clouding title to much
of the land within that District.
(5) Congress shares with the residents of the Fairfax
Business District of Wyandotte County, Kansas, a desire to
remove all clouds on title resulting from the Lawsuit without
additional cost or expense to either the United States, the
State of Kansas, the Unified Government of Kansas City and
Wyandotte County, Kansas, and all other landowners within the
Fairfax Business District of Wyandotte County, Kansas.
(6) The Wyandotte Nation and the Unified Government of
Kansas City and Wyandotte County have reached an agreement
settling the Lawsuit which requires implementing legislation by
Congress.
(b) Purposes.--The purposes of this Act are as follows: --
(1) To settle the Lawsuit.
(2) To direct the Secretary to take into trust for the
benefit of the Wyandotte Nation the Settlement Lands in
settlement of the Wyandotte Nation's Lawsuit and the land
claims asserted therein.
(c) Definitions.--For purposes of this Act, the following
definitions apply: --
(1) Kansas lands.--The term ''Kansas Lands'' means all of
the lands described and identified as ''Gifted Lands'' and
''Accreted Lands'' in the Wyandotte Nation's complaint filed in
the Lawsuit, as well as those portions of Seventh Street and
Minnesota Avenue located within Kansas City, Kansas, which the
Wyandotte Nation claim in the Lawsuit were included within the
Huron Cemetery under the Treaty of January 31, 1855.
(2) Lawsuit.--The term ''Lawsuit'' means Wyandotte Nation
v. Unified Government of Kansas City and Wyandotte County,
Kansas, U.S. D.C. Kan., Case No. 012303-CM.
(3) secretary.--The term ''Secretary'' means the Secretary
of the Interior.
(4) Settlement lands.--The term ''Settlement Lands'' means
the following parcel of real property located in the City of
Edwardsville, Wyandotte County, Kansas and more particularly
described in Quit Claim Deed filed for record as Parcel I.D.
944806, Book 3190 at Page 198 and Book 4408 at Page 789 in the
Wyandotte County, Kansas, Register of Deeds Office.
(5) Unified government.--The term ''Unified Government''
means the Unified Government of Kansas City and Wyandotte
County, Kansas.
(6) Wyandotte nation.--The term ''Wyandotte Nation'' means
the Wyandotte Nation, a federally-recognized Indian tribe.
(d) Extinguishment of Land Claims.--Not later than 90 days after
the date of the enactment of this section and as part of the settlement
of the Lawsuit and the Wyandotte Nation's land claims asserted therein,
the Secretary shall take and hold title to the Settlement Lands in
trust for the benefit of the Wyandotte Nation pursuant to and within
the scope and meaning of section 20(b)(1)(B)(i) of the Indian Gaming
Regulatory Act (25 U.S.C. 2719(b)(1)(B)(i)). Any and all claims which
the Wyandotte Nation has or could have asserted in the Lawsuit shall be
extinguished upon--
(1) the Secretary accepting title to the Settlement Lands
in trust for the Wyandotte Nation; and
(2) publication in the Federal Register of a notice of
approval of tribal-State compact between the Wyandotte Nation
and the State of Kansas pursuant to section 11(d)(3)(B) of the
Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (25 U.S.C. 2710(d)(3)(B)).
(e) Shriner Property.--Congress confirms that the United States
acquired title to the Shriner's Property in trust for the benefit of
the Wyandotte Nation effective July 15, 1996. Notwithstanding the trust
status of the Shriner's Property, the Wyandotte Nation shall have no
rights to conduct gaming on the Shriner's Property upon-
(1) the Secretary accepting title to the Settlement Lands
in trust for the Wyandotte Nation; and
(2) publication in the Federal Register of a notice
approval of a tribal-State compact between the Wyandotte Nation
and the State of Kansas pursuant to section 11(d)(3)(B) of the
Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (25 U.S.C. 2710(d)(3)(B)).
Solution:
Requires the Secretary of the Interior to take specified Settlement Lands into trust for the benefit of the Wyandotte Nation as part of the settlement of claims in a certain lawsuit of the Wyandotte Nation against the United Government of Kansas City and Wyandotte County, Kansas. Extinguishes any and all claims which the Wyandotte Nation has or could have asserted in the lawsuit upon specified conditions being met.Denies the Wyandotte Nation gaming rights on the Shriner's Property, a property already held in trust for it by the United States, upon specified conditions being met.