Premise:
"After a long history of libertarian ideas, he proposes a version of Murray's basic argument, which he calls the nonagression axiom--no one can use force against anyone else."
Hypothesis: Physical force should be avoided at all times.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

it is not possible to tell

input question: If so, you're wrong. If this premise is true, does that tell us:"So, you're not right."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: yes

Question:
Based on the premise "well do you have do you have any like Chucky Cheese or trying to", can we conclude that "Do you have a Chucky Cheese?"? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
yes

Question: Sentence A: The virtual equality of the average carrier time to serve urban and rural customers is a major finding of this paper.

Sentence B: The paper presents opposing viewpoints on the topics.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question: Once in a while.
Always doing it every day.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Problem: Here is a premise:
it it it'll save your fingers trust me

Here is a hypothesis:
Trust me, it will save your fingers.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer:
yes