Premise: "Industrial society, wrote Clark Kerr, president of the University of California at Berkeley, in 1960, might undermine freedom 'in the workplace,' but the compensation was the greater range of 'alternatives in goods and services,' and thus 'a greater scope of freedom' in Americans' 'personal lives." If this premise is true, what does that tell us about whether it entails the hypothesis "Clark Kerr never said anything about the industrial society and its impact on our lives; his area of expertise was hydrology."?
no