In this task, you're given a paragraph and title from the research paper. Your task is to classify whether the given title is suitable or not for the research paper based on the given paragraph. Return "True" if title is proper according to paragraph else "False".

Paragraph: Background. Experimental inoculation is an important tool for common cold and asthma research. Producing rhinovirus (RV) inocula from nasal secretions has required prolonged observation of the virus donor to exclude extraneous pathogens. We produced a RV-A16 inoculum using reverse genetics and determined the dose necessary to cause moderate colds in seronegative volunteers. Methods. The consensus sequence of RV-A16 from a previous inoculum was cloned, and inoculum virus was produced using reverse genetics techniques. After safety testing, volunteers were inoculated with either RV-A16 (n = 26) or placebo (n = 10), Jackson cold scores were recorded, and nasal secretions were tested for shedding of RV-A16 ribonucleic acid. Results. The reverse genetics process produced infectious virus that was neutralized by specific antisera and had a mutation rate similar to conventional virus growth techniques. The 1000 median tissue culture infectious dose (TCID 50 ) dose produced moderate colds in most individuals with effects similar to that of a previously tested conventional RV-A16 inoculum. Conclusions. Reverse genetics techniques produced a RV-A16 inoculum that can cause clinical colds in seronegative volunteers, and they also serve as a stable source of virus for laboratory use. The recombinant production procedures eliminate the need to derive seed virus from nasal secretions, thus precluding introduction of extraneous pathogens through this route.
Title: Development of a Rhinovirus Inoculum Using a Reverse Genetics Approach
False

Paragraph: Next year will mark the 100th anniversary of the Michaelis-Menten equation [1], one of the most important and well known models in enzymology. Remarkable progress in enzymology over the past hundred years has not only provided deep insight into biological processes, but also has dramatically changed our lives. However, because of limitations in available techniques, enzymologists primarily investigate the in vitro properties and catalytic mechanisms of individual enzymes. Thus, they often fail to address a fundamental scientific question: how are biological processes, most of which are chemical reactions catalyzed by enzymes, coordinated in space and time to produce a living organism [2]? Fortunately, applications of new techniques and, in particular, wide acceptance of the idea of systems have enabled enzymologists to begin studying enzymes in the context of dynamic, complicated biological systems in recent years. Many excellent reviews and research articles on enzymology have been published in the past few years. These articles highlight the latest developments in enzymology, and should prove helpful for understanding how to best integrate the idea of systems into enzymology research. In living organisms, protein post-translational modification (PTM) pathways are large and interconnected networks. Via reversible or irreversible covalent modifications, allo-steric regulations of PTM enzymes and cross-talk of PTM pathways, PTM networks enable organisms to respond to stimuli faster than is possible through gene transcription regulation. Therefore, PTM enzymes, as key nodes of biological networks, are a recent focus of attention.
Title: SCIENCE CHINA A glimpse of enzymology within the idea of systems
False

Paragraph: via the respiratory tract and causes severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome by infecting lung epithelial cells and macrophages. Macrophages can readily recognize the virus and eliminate it. MERS-CoV infects cells via its Spike (S) glycoprotein that binds on Dipeptidyl-Peptidase 4 (DPP4) receptor present on macrophages. Whether this Spike/DPP4 association affects macrophage responses remains unknown. Herein we demonstrated that infection of macrophages with lentiviral particles pseudotyped with MERS-CoV S glycoprotein results in suppression of macrophage responses since it reduced the capacity of macrophages to produce TNF and IL-6 in naive and LPS-activated THP-1 macrophages and augmented LPS-induced production of the immunosuppressive cytokine IL-10. MERS-CoV S glycoprotein induced the expression of the negative regulator of TLR signaling IRAK-M as well as of the transcriptional repressor PPAR. Inhibition of DPP4 by its inhibitor sitagliptin or siRNA abrogated the effects of MERS-CoV S glycoprotein on IRAK-M, PPAR and IL-10, confirming that its immunosuppressive effects were mediated by DPP4 receptor. The effect was observed both in THP-1 macrophages and human primary peripheral blood monocytes. These findings support a DPP4-mediated suppressive action of MERS-CoV in macrophages and suggest a potential target for effective elimination of its pathogenicity.
Title: Middle east respiratory syndrome corona virus spike glycoprotein suppresses macrophage responses via DPP4- mediated induction of IRAK-M and PPAR
False