Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.

Let me give you an example: hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
The answer to this example can be: Yes
Here is why: The comment has the word 'suck' in it and is classified as sexually explicit. Hence, it is a positive example

OK. solve this:
I'm a lifelong Democrat and, as such, am embarassed that this bill received partisan Democratic support in the House. It is, in my opinion, as elitist bill; backed by the "big hitter" economic interests and will use tax dollars to benefit only a very small segment of Oregon's residents. I've vociferously opposed it in all forms and, when the state's Democratic party leadership and legislators back such a bill, it, sadly, makes me think I must be really "out of step" with Oregon's "new" Democratic Party. The Democratic Party was once the Party of the "little guy", the working class and the middle class Americans, and the under represented, "underclass of America". This bill benefits none of them. It's a statewide example of "trickle down" economics. Tax dollars trickle down out of the pockets of Oregonian taxpayers into the pockets of the wealthy and powerful.

If that's what the Oregon Democratic Party is all about today, I'm truly an anachronism.
Answer:
No