In this task, you will be presented with a context from an academic paper and you have to write an answerable question based on the context. Your questions can be extractive, abstractive, or yes-no questions.

Input: Consider Input: The embedding-wise convolution is to apply a convolution filter w $\in \mathbb {R}^{\mathcal {\}k*d}$ to a window of $k$ word embeddings to generate a new feature, i.e., summarizing a local context of $k$ words. By applying the convolutional filter to all possible windows in the sentence, a feature map $c$ will be generated.

Output: What supports the claim that injected CNN into recurent units will enhance ability of the model to catch local context and reduce ambiguities?

Input: Consider Input: We test our proposed approach for binary classification on either sarcasm or irony, on seven benchmark datasets retrieved from different media sources. Below we describe each dataset, please see Table TABREF1 below for a summary. Reddit: BIBREF21 collected SARC, a corpus comprising of 600.000 sarcastic comments on Reddit. We use main subset, SARC 2.0, and the political subset, SARC 2.0 pol. Twitter: We use the Twitter dataset provided for the SemEval 2018 Task 3, Irony Detection in English Tweets BIBREF18 . The dataset was manually annotated using binary labels. We also use the dataset by BIBREF4 , which is manually annotated for sarcasm. Finally, we use the dataset by BIBREF20 , who collected a user self-annotated corpus of tweets with the #sarcasm hashtag. Online Dialogues: We utilize the Sarcasm Corpus V1 (SC-V1) and the Sarcasm Corpus V2 (SC-V2), which are subsets of the Internet Argument Corpus (IAC). Compared to other datasets in our selection, these differ mainly in text length and structure complexity BIBREF22 .

Output: What are the three different sources of data?

Input: Consider Input: For task 1, we use F1-score as evaluation metric. We use manual evaluation for task 2. There are five evaluation metrics for task 2 as following.

Task completion ratio: The number of completed tasks divided by the number of total tasks.

User satisfaction degree: There are five scores -2, -1, 0, 1, 2, which denote very dissatisfied, dissatisfied, neutral, satisfied and very satisfied, respectively.

Response fluency: There are three scores -1, 0, 1, which indicate nonfluency, neutral, fluency.

Number of dialogue turns: The number of utterances in a task-completed dialogue.

Guidance ability for out of scope input: There are two scores 0, 1, which represent able to guide or unable to guide.
Output: What metrics are used in the evaluation?