Sky in the background does not mean that you are looking at it .. So what could be the question?
Question followed by answer: Given the sentence "A man standing on the top of a contraption of poles with the sky as his background." can we conclude that "There is a man standing because hes looking at the sky."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
it is not possible to tell

A child bouncing on an attraction does not imply it being the kids first experience.. So what could be the question?
Question followed by answer: Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "A child is in midair on a bouncing carnival attraction."
Hypothesis: "A kid in their first bouncy castle experience."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
it is not possible to tell

Walking past something is not always the same as crossing something. A protest is not the same as a painting.. So what could be the question?
Question followed by answer: Premise: "A man is crossing the stop the violence painting."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A man is walking past the stop the violence protest." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
it is not possible to tell

The front end being up does not mean the whole snow mobile is in the air.. So what could be the question?
Question followed by answer:
Given the sentence "Snowmobiler riding snowmobile with front end up in the air." can we conclude that "Snowmobiler riding in the air."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
it is not possible to tell