Q: NEW YORK (CNN) -- An oil painting was returned Tuesday to the estate of a Jewish art dealer who was forced to consign the painting and other artwork under Nazi Germany before fleeing the country.

"Portrait of a Musician Playing a Bagpipe" was done in 1632 by an unknown artist.

The painting, "Portrait of a Musician Playing a Bagpipe," was done in 1632 by an unknown painter from the Northern Netherlandish school, according to a statement from the U.S. attorney's office in southern New York.

It was owned by Max Stern, an art dealer who had a gallery in Dusseldorf, Germany, until 1937, when the Nazis' Reich Chamber for Fine Arts ordered him to liquidate the gallery and its inventory, the statement said.

Stern, who died in 1987, left no heirs. He and his wife had founded the Max Stern Art Restitution Project, which directly benefits Concordia University and McGill University in Montreal, Canada, and Hebrew University in Jerusalem, according to a statement from U.S Immigration and Customs Enforcement.

The painting was returned Tuesday -- Holocaust Remembrance Day -- to Clarence Epstein of Concordia University on behalf of the executors of the estate, said Lou Martinez of the immigration agency.

It was returned in a ceremony at the Museum of Jewish Heritage in New York, he said.

The painting had been owned by Philip Mould Ltd., a London, England, gallery, when Lawrence Steigrad, a New York art dealer, bought it in 2008, the New York attorney's office said.

Neither had any idea of the painting's past. Philip Mould Ltd. had purchased the painting the year before from Lempertz Auction House. The same auction house sold the painting in 1937 after Stern was forced to liquidate, without receiving any proceeds from the sale, the New York attorney's office said.

1. An oil painting
2. Jewish
3. he was forced to consign the painting
4. an unknown artist
5. Max Stern
6. in 1937
7. Nazis' Reich Chamber for Fine Arts ordered him to liquidate the gallery and its inventory
8. Dusseldorf, Germany,
9. on Holocaust Remembrance Day
10. Tuesday
11. yes
12. through a ceremony
13. New York
14. Lawrence Steigrad
15. a New York art dealer
16. Philip Mould Ltd
17. London, England

Numbered questions:
1. What type of painting was returned to the art dealer?
2. What was his religious affliction?
3. What did he have to do before leaving the country?
4. Who painted the artwork?
5. Who owned the painting?
6. When did he have to sell his inventory?
7. Why did he have to do this?
8. Where was his art gallery?
9. When was the painting returned?
10. What day of the week did that fall on?
11. Was the returning of the painting made official?
12. How so?
13. In what state did this take place?
14. Who purchased the painting in 2008?
15. Who was he?
16. Who owned it before that?
17. Where did this company do business?

Q: CHAPTER VII.

SETH CONTINUES HIS NARRATIVE OF THE MEXICAN ADVENTURE.

The next evening the young Hardys again took their seats by Seth, and, without any delay, he went on with his story.

"After El Zeres had ridden off, the lieutenant, Pedro, selected ten from the men around--for pretty well the whole camp had gathered round us--and told them, in the first place, to clear the house of the hammock and other belongings of El Zeres, and when this was done to carry Rube in. Bound and helpless as he was, there was a visible repugnance on the part of the men to touch him, so great was the fear which his tremendous strength had excited. However, six of them took him up and carried him into the hut--for it was little more--and threw him down like a log in the inner room. I walked in of my own accord, and sat down on the ground near him. I heard Pedro give orders to some of the men outside to take away the dead bodies and bury them, and for the rest to go down to their campfires. Then he entered the house with his other four men.

"The house was just the ordinary Mexican hut. It contained two rooms, or rather, one room partially divided into two, the inner compartment forming the sleeping-room of the family. There was no door between the rooms, nor was there any window; the light entering through the wide opening into the outer room. The outer room had no regular windows, only some chinks or loopholes, through which a certain amount of light could come; but these were stopped up with straw, for the Mexicans are a chilly people; and as the door was always open, plenty of light came in through it. The house was not built of adobe, as are most Mexican huts, but of stones, with the interstices plastered with mud."

1. Seth
2. He went on with his story.
3. No.
4. His story.
5. two.
6. Yes.
7. No, it was one room prtially divided.
8. No.
9. A wide opening into the outer room.
10. Plenty of light through the open door.
11. Yes.
12. Yes.
13. Straw,
14. no.
15. Always open.
16. Pedro.
17. ten.
18. To clear the house of the hammock and other belongings of El Zeres
19. Rube
20. They threw him down like a log in the inner room

Numbered questions:
1. Who did the Hardys sit by?
2. What did he do?
3. Did he wait a while first?
4. When did he continue?
5. How many rooms did the house have?
6. Was the house ordinary?
7. Was there a door between rooms?
8. Windows?
9. How did light get in?
10. How much light could come in?
11. Were there any holes or openings in the walls?
12. Did they fill them with anything?
13. What?
14. Did they keep the door locked?
15. What state was the door in?
16. Who was the lieutenant?
17. How many people did he choose?
18. What was his first order to the men?
19. Who were they to take in the hut?
20. How was he deposited in the hut?