Does not mention whether the woman considers herself to be working nor whether the shirt belongs to her husband.. So what could be the question?
Question followed by answer: Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "A woman ironing a shirt for someone."
Hypothesis: "A woman is working for her husband."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
it is not possible to tell
A man is texting his date while sitting in a restaurant.
The question and answer are below.
If "Under the circular mirror." does that mean that "A guy checks his mobile phone while sitting alone at the restaurant table near the wall."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
it is not possible to tell
Taping off a police area is not the same as eating dinner. Also it's assumed that officers that are taping off a police area are working and are in uniform.
The question and answer are below.
Can we conclude from "2 police officers at a suburban home taping off a police area with yellow tape." that "2 officers are out of uniform eating dinner."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
no
The women in red bathing suits are in red bathing suits.. So what could be the question?
Question followed by answer: Premise: "Women in red bathing suits and hats are dancing in the sand at the beijing 2008 olympics."
Hypothesis: "The women are in red bathing suits."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
yes
A woman looking away from the ad can not simultaneously be looking at an advertisement.
The question and answer are below.
Premise: "A blond woman on a cellphone looking at an advertisement."
Hypothesis: "The woman is looking away from the ad."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
no
A bicyclist wearing sponsored gear with spectators implies a bike race is happening.
The question and answer are below.
Premise: "A bicyclist in sponsored gear and expensive white helmet rides a carbon alloy bicycle while four spectators look on in the background behind a protective railing."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "The bicyclist is wearing sponsored gear." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
yes