In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.

Q: Comment: Kag, you are exactly right. I should have mentioned that Stefanini was not in a relationship when he was nominated. Two theories, equally repugnant, were advanced to explain the Vatican's refusal to accept him:
1. France had recently legalized same-sex marriage.
2. Stefanini could have -- gasp! -- choosen to marry while serving as ambassador.

A: Non-threat
****
Q: Comment: 20 years old is not a kid. I remember when I was 20 and there is no way I was so selfish and immature that I would kill someone, pull their dead body off my vehicle, then leave.

A: Threat
****
Q: Comment: You're disgraceful. You know that Trump is unfit to lead our country and is probably mentally ill. But you're happy to endorse him and ride on his coattails as long as he's doing well in the polls. So long as you get reelected you couldn't care less if he leads out country over a cliff.

Party over country, just as our founding fathers feared. I have no sympathy for you and hope Trump drags every one of you down. You don't deserve the honor of representing us.

A:
Non-threat
****