Enclosed is a revised draft of the policy without any modifications on the exclusions as this is an area that ACE is apparently continuing to develop. As I mentioned yesterday, we will talk with you about this on Monday at 1(Houston time). Our commercial team would then like to have a call with ACE sometime after our call to talk about exclusions, subrogation rights and matters relating to books and records that are addressed in the policy. I don't think that all of you need to be on this call but was wondering if any of you would be available for this call. Please let me know.
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: policy
Kim, Thank you for your time on Wednesday. I enjoyed meeting you and appreciated the discussion regarding pipeline economics. I was thinking about the capacity you sold in 2003 on an Index to Index basis. On the attached diagram, the boxes colored black represent my understanding of your current position (you are locked-in to $1.00/MMBtu for the Calif. Border Index minus San Juan Index but exposed to San Juan Basin gas prices for the fuel required to deliver 20,000 MMBtu/d to the Calif. Border). You can easily lock-in your cost of fuel gas as shown by the swap colored in red. I believe that you did this capacity trade when gas prices were higher, therefore you could fix your fuel cost at today's lower prices and earn a higher margin on your capacity sale than originally expected.
Answer: Index to Index Capacity Charge
Here is an email: ISC - Customer Service Survey Ticket#HD0000000697403, Customer called to check the status of a check for an expense report : Thank you for taking the time to fill out our Customer Service Survey. Your input is crucial to our continued efforts in establishing and providing you with World Class Support. Please take a minute and complete the 5 question survey then submit it back to us when you are done. Once again, thank you for your participation.
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: ISC - Customer Service Survey
Q: Gerald, Per our recent discussions, I need to get two CAs as outlined below: Power Pipeline Partners Address: Power Pipeline Partners L.P. 10000 Memorial Drive Suite 200 Houston, TX 77024-3409 Contact: Randy Schorre-Vice President & COO I would like to put language in that protects either of us (non-circumvention?) for deal leads that are divulged to the other party if they were not already known to either party or could be reasonably found out in the "open" market. I would also like to protect any proprietary deal structuring exposed by ECS. Energy Transfer Group Energy Transfer Company 2838 Woodside St. Dallas, TX 75204 Contact: Kelcy L. Warren-Partner I would like to put language in that protects either of us (non-circumvention?) for deal leads that are divulged to the other party if they were not already known to either party or could be reasonably found out in the "open" market. I would also like to protect any proprietary deal structuring exposed by ECS as well as any electric motor drive technology exposed by the Energy Transfer Group. Please start on putting these together and I will call you this afternoon. I'm trying to get these out int the next day or so as I dragged my feet on this last week. Sorry for the squeeze. Thanks,
Propose a subject line
A: Power Pipeline Partners/Energy Transfer Group CAs
IN: Dear Dr. Lay: I am writing this message to you after a few days on the ground in India. The news from India continues to be grim and I have several things that I want to discuss with you. 1. The news on the oil and gas front is not good as u probably have heard by now. There is little chance that BG will get its request for operatorship approved for various reasons that I can explain. If u like, we can do the deal on similar terms with another party and close the same very quickly. I have been contacted by a few people and could deliver the same to you if there is an interest. 2. On the Dabhol front, I would like to urge that we meet and discuss a few ideas that I have. I know that you are extremely busy at this time but maybe next week I could come to Houston and we could find some time to meet. I know that there might be a difficulty in non-Enron especially ex-Enron people working this issue when u have a full internal team already on the job... but I think that it maybe useful and apprpriate to put those concerns aside and see if a solution could be found using any and all available resources. There maybe ways that would prevent the equity from taking a big write off at this time and get everyone moving towards finding a solution. In the meantime, there is a strong effort in India along the judicial enquiry front to use it to derail the arbitration. Our friends there can help us only if we are on the ground and give them some hope that a solution is going to be found. The Indian government is not terribly motivated at this time and if Enron does not creat options, it will not result in a terribly good result for Enron either financially or from a PR perspective. Again, I know that with several issues occupying you at this time, this may not be the most burning one. However we have had limited success at a resolution so far and some other alternatives maybe worth considering. If you permit, I would love to discuss them with you. regards

Generate a subject line.

OUT: India Issues -Catching Up
IN: This is an email
Mike & Scott, Sally asked me to forward this to you & wanted to know if there was any way possible you could attend. I apologize for the short notice, but with Sally going out of the country, things have been really hectic. Sheila Glover will also be attending. Please let me know as soon as possible & I will let Paige know. Thanks,

What is the subject?

OUT:
FAS 133 Offsite