Problem: Here is a premise:
Privilege itself already suggests to me the sense of overness, if you will.

Here is a hypothesis:
Privilege will never be enough.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Sentence 1: Executions and torture followed.

Sentence 2: Afterwards there was torture and executions
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: yes

Question:
Poland's development of a market economy has produced a proliferation of stores and boutiques, including many imported from Western Europe and North America.

Does it follow that "Poland has protected its culture, despite the Western European influence."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
it is not possible to tell

Q: If I had an idea, but clearly I was mistaken. , can we say that "They had no idea."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A: no

Premise:
"The Commission also assumed that the average revenue per piece for the 21 industrial countries whose rates were available applied to the remaining 5 ICs whose rates were not available."
Hypothesis: The commission assumed the countries with rates that were unavailable were very different from the other countries.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

no

Sentence 1: The Las Vegas Ski and Snowboard Resort has nine long runs on 40 acres (16 hectares); despite its name, snowboarding is allowed only at certain times.

Sentence 2: The Las Vegas Ski and Snowboard Resort has unlimited space.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer:
no