Premise:
"I, Hercule Poirot, affirm that the man who entered the chemist's shop, and purchased strychnine at six o'clock on Monday last was not Mr. Inglethorp, for at six o'clock on that day Mr. Inglethorp was escorting Mrs. Raikes back to her home from a neighbouring farm. "
Hypothesis: I can confirm that Mr. Inglethorp was the man who entered the chemist's shop.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

no

input question: let me think who um i like Hebert um oh you don't know Hebert Laws but Hebert Laws is a flute player he's a jazz flute player and i like um uh Chuck Mangione do you know who Chuck Mangione is yeah i like Chuck Mangione i'm trying to think of all um If this premise is true, does that tell us:"I like Herbert Laws a lot."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: yes

Question:
Based on the premise "OFFSETTING RECEIPTS -Offsetting receipts are a subset of offsetting collections.", can we conclude that "Offsetting collections often involve death/estate sales. "? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
it is not possible to tell

Question: Sentence A: To reach Gretna Green, take the M6 north from Penrith.

Sentence B: One way to reach Gretna Green is by taking M6 North from Penrith

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Question: i don't think Jim Kelly is about to be swayed away from the Bills any time
Jim Kelly won't be leaving the Bills any time soon.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Problem: Here is a premise:
Cuban cigars are exceptional value for money (but U.S. residents are not allowed to bring them home).

Here is a hypothesis:
U.S residents are always allowed to bring Cuban cigars into the country.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer:
no