input question: excellent, fully successful, minimally satisfactory, or unsatisfactory performance based on the achievement levels assigned for each Summary Ratings performance element. If this premise is true, does that tell us:"The Summary Ratings were essential for tracking internal improvement."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: it is not possible to tell

Question:
Based on the premise "News fiddles with its rankings to improve newsstand sales.", can we conclude that "News lies that it has higher ranking, and this attracts more viewers and readers."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
it is not possible to tell

Question: Sentence A: His criteria come from Swiss psychiatrist Carl Jung by way of an American mother-daughter team named Katharine Briggs and Isabel Briggs Myers, who created the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator.

Sentence B: The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator was invented by Carl Jung, Katharine Briggs and Isabel Briggs Myers.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Question: Good cooks aren't easy to get.
Good cooks are a dime a dozen.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Problem: Here is a premise:
that's right you know it gives me a paycheck you know it's only like the works only you know three weeks goes for like three to four weeks three times a year

Here is a hypothesis:
Do you get paid for a full paid job or a contract?

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question:
But contradictions abound in Joyce's latest outing.

Does it follow that "Everything about Joyce's recent outing made sense and checked out."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
no