In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.

Comment: Sad that we even would have to file charges like this because of thieves.
Non-threat

Comment: No, members of the public who do not make nicey-face are now officially silenced. Kidd no longer has to listen to them, she can just have them removed.

Since the point of these rules seems to be to protect Cherie Kidd from anything she finds unpleasant, I would guess that her ability to trash Council meetings, or do any other lunacy that occurs to her, will actually be more protected than it already was.
Non-threat

Comment: The ancient, pre-biblical Near Eastern theological/anthropological concept, that a god is a being whom it is right for a human being to obey, plainly has not ended at all well.

As for "loving" God, it requires a good bit of strain on modern concepts of love to make sense of the biblical references. How can human beings actually be commanded to love anyone?, as the Shma' in Deuteronomy 6. In fact, like a lot of biblical poetry, that language is based on Assyrian royal decrees: the perfect loyalty of the subject is demanded, or else the subject is in a lot of trouble; and that relationship is what goes by the name "love."
Non-threat