Given the task definition and input, reply with output. In this task, you will be shown a prompt from a judicial decision and multiple holding statements derived from citations following text in a legal decision. Holdings represent the governing legal rule when the law is applied to a particular set of facts. There are five answer choices for each citing text. The correct answer is the holding statement that corresponds to the citing text. The four incorrect answers are other holding statements. You should find the correct option. There is a <HOLDING> token in the position of the citing text prompt where the holding statement was extracted.

damage award in this case was fashioned for a compensatory purpose or that it is unconstitutionally disproportionate to the character of Travelers' bad faith behavior or the award of compensatory damages. We also reject Grossi's position that the trial court erred or abused its discretion in awarding interest on the $300,000.00 UIM claim, rather than the entire arbitration award. We, however, agree with Travelers that the trial court erred as a matter of law in awarding Gros-si's expert witness fee expenses as recoverable costs under section 8371. Accordingly, we direct the trial court to mold the costs portion of its verdict to reflect an award of $2,729.66. In all other respects the trial court's verdict and judgment is affirmed. Judgment affirmed in part and vacated in p 002) (<HOLDING>). We do so here. 2 . A loss reserve is an
Holding statements: (A) holding appeal from order denying posttrial motions was proper since prothonotary entered judgment prior to appellate disposition (B) holding that in the interest of judicial economy considering appeal from order denying posttrial motions and ordering entry of judgment in favor of plaintiff even though judgment was not actually entered (C) holding that although an order dismissing appellants motion for posttrial relief was not reduced to judgment in the interests of judicial economy the supreme court could regard as done that which ought to have been done and proceed with the appeal (D) holding that the trial courts written order was not the entry of a sentence sufficient to support a determination that a judgment of conviction was entered (E) holding premature notice of appeal was treated as entered on date of entry of final judgment
(B)