As we discussed, attached is my "Cheat Sheet" which I use to guide me when approving non-US counterparties that come in through EnronOnline via Houston Credit. London Legal and I try to coordinate our responses but I cannot speak for them and the standards they may apply to approving counterparties to trade online. They also frequently deal with different countries than us. You may want to speak to Justin Boyd. Generally, with respect to most physical trading, except power trading, there are no legal restrictions to trading. Most of the restrictions in this list are with respect to financial products. Physical bandwidth has generally not done much legal due diligence outside of the US and the UK and bandwidth is therefore not open to non US and UK counterparties. With physical power, generally, in most countries they require some sort of power marketing license so I look to the power lawyers to guide me. As I also mentioned, for Japan or Australian based counterparties I wait for David Minns or Jane McBride to advise me.
Answer: EOL Country Approval List
Here is an email: Hi Amy. Since you've taken over the responsibility for verbally confirming trades booked to John Arnold, Larry May, Mike Maggie, Dutch, and Andy Zipper, I just wanted to clarify that part of this responsibility includes clearing the trades in Deal Capture/Structure. When you verbally confirm a deal, you have to click on Counterparty and Verify the deal, noting with whom you verballed. If you don't do this, the confirms group has no way of knowing whether or not you've verbally confirmed the deal. Also, in keeping with our global standards for sending out confirmations, verballing should be done on Trade Day - although we give you until noon on T+1 before sending out your deals. At that point, any trades that are not verbally confirmed will be generated and sent. (This does not preclude the need for you to follow up with deals not yet verballed). The exception to this is, of course, if you have identified an economic discrepancy and "Actioned" the deal as such in TAGG - in this case we will wait until the Action has been cleared in TAGG. Me or someone in my group can come over an show you the process in TAGG if you're unfamiliar with it. (or Derek Bailey can show you too) Give me a call if you have any questions or if this deviates from your understanding of the process. Thanks, Diane 3.0443 PS - Also, can you or Errol let me know who in Risk is your backup for this function, as well as the brokered deals you check out? Thanks.
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: Verbal confirmation for direct trades
Q: ******************************************* University of California - Berkeley Haas School of Business Fall 2001 BA/E 296.1 - Nonprofit Boards of Directors ******************************************* *PLEASE RETURN TO lynnelh@pacbell.net BY THURSDAY, OCTOBER 25th, 12 NOON! * STUDENT QUESTIONNAIRE To assist us in determining your knowledge of, and experience in, the nonprofit sector we ask that you fill out this short questionnaire prior to the first class on October 27th and return it by e-mail to lynnelh@pacbell.net as soon as possible (please by no later than October 25th, 12 noon, so results can be collated!). It should only take a minute. In addition, you should have received a previous email from me with information about the reader, syllabus and class attendance. If you did not receive this email, please notify me immediately and I will forward it to you. Thank you and I look forward to meeting you on Saturday! NAME: 1. Have you served as a member of a nonprofit board before? If no, skip to question 3 and 5, if yes, please answer question 2, 3, 4 and 5. 2. Name of organization(s) and approximate dollar amount of operating budget? 3. In a few short phrases, summarize what you feel is the most important role of a board member in a nonprofit organization. 4. In a few short phrases, what have been the most exciting and challenging aspects of your board role? 5. From your perspective, what do you believe are the two or three largest challenges facing the nonprofit sector today? Thank you!
Propose a subject line
A: BA/E296.1 Questionnaire-due Oct. 25
IN: Andy, This will update you on this matter. You may recall that it is a collection matter for about $1,800,000 for breach of spot gas purchase contracts by Triad. We tried to arbitrate, but Triad wouldn't answer the arbitration (even though I got calls from Purnell afterward, who asked if there was some way we could settle the arbitration). We then filed suit in the 125th Judicial District Court of Harris County, Texas, against both Triad and Purnell, to see if that would smoke them out. As you know, after filing our original petition, we found an inadvertant technical error in it that required correction, and at no charge to you refiled a first amended petition that corrected the error. Since then, we served the first amended petition and citations on the Secretary of State of the State of Texas, as is allowed by law under such circumstances. The Secretary of State then forwarded the first amended petition and citations to the addresses we gave them, by certified mail, r.r.r. At this time, which is long after the expiration of the answer date, no certified mail receipt has reportedly been received by the Secretary of State from Purnell or Triad. No answer or other pleading has been filed by Triad or Purnell. This is not unexpected, given that Triad dodged us during the attempted arbitration. The caselaw supports the position that we have made effective service on both Triad and Purnell, although there is some room to argue that the Secretary of State has to receive a green card back, even if it is marked "refused". If we wanted to try to nail this point down by going to the additional expense of personal service on Triad and Purnell, we could, but if Purnell is not going to respond to registered mail, he will likely attempt to dodge personal service as well. I am not recommending it. We will shortly receive from the Secretary of State the so-called "Whitney Certificate" and file-stamped copies of the citations, which we will file with the court, along with a motion for entry of default judgment. I will make sure you see a draft before it is filed. We will need to set a hearing on our motion, and produce evidence of our damages. I would not expect the hearing to take more than an hour. We previously filed an affidavit signed by Bryce, as well as a matrix for computing our prejudgment interest (given that there were many spot gas sales, and prejudgement interest as to each would start at different times) prepared by Shielah Castro. I will follow up with them to see if they would be willing and available to come with me to testify at the hearing, and will of course fully prepare them beforehand. Also, I will need to testify regarding our attorneys' fees in this matter. Parenthetically, given the length of time this matter has been on file, it has been routinely set on the dismissal for want of prosecution docket. As you know, it is merely a formality and I will file the appropriate motion to get this taken care of. I will send you a draft of that if you wish. A hearing is set on this docket for October 23, at which time I presently have a conflict, and Bonnie has kindly agreed to attend in my place if necessary. No one else need be at that hearing. Please let me know if there is anyone else who needs to be in the loop on this. I will keep you advised. Britt

Generate a subject line.

OUT: ENA v. Triad/Sherwood Purnell
Hello it's me again- Why don't you write back I know, I know, you are busy. Listen, wishful thinking, I looked up flights for February (hoping you will want to go Feb 6th-Feb 10th) That is a Wed. through Sunday with 3 full days of skiing. Anyway, there is a promotional flight to Vail for $631.22 fo both of us roundtrip Think about it!!! Megan
Answer:
ignoring me??