This is the content of an email: John, I made the changes you suggested. The prior version contained a non-circumvention (you can't pursue the project without me) versus the current exclusivity (you must work only with me), which seems somewhat more restrictive since it would keep us from bringing in additional participants. I've changed language in the next paragraph to avoid a contradiction. If we go with this approach then I suspect we will want to work on an LOI which divides up responsibility going forward. Let me know what you think. Kay

Subject: Ameresco

This is the content of an email: I can't believe we have a puppy. Everything smells like puppy to me, even though I took a very long shower. Michael and Pal had a nice visit this morning. Pal is still whining a bit. I brought one of our puppy books to the office, and I'll sneak a peak when I can. I did read about the up at night stuff, and it says that so long as you don't let them get in bed with you, the whining should stop pretty quickly. I hope the resting on the chest didn't mess it up, but boy, was I desperate. He did great using the grass when we got up. He definitely knows why we go outside. Kaley picked on him a little, but she was at her food bowl. I set up the little crate where she can't look in it, so he has an escape. We should walk the perimeter to make sure there aren't any escape routes. We probably need to protect the air conditioner wires until he is old enough to train to the electronic fence. Thanks for taking the pig rat back. Love,

Subject: I can't believe it.

This is the content of an email: Hi Mr. Tycholiz, My name is Tamara and I work with Judy on the Enron program here at PricewaterhouseCoopers. I have been looking over your file and have a question with regard to the fax which you sent to us on August 29, 2001. There may have been a misunderstanding regarding the intention of you faxing those documents to us. We looked at the fax and understood it to be for our files. However, from your most recent email, we are now thinking that you had expected us to take some kind of action on your behalf with the IRS. The original notice from the IRS is dated June 23rd, 2001. It states that should you not agree with their figures, you should contact them. We assumed that you did not agree with the notice and had contacted them. Our question is: did you contact the IRS and/or send in the forms with your wife's SSN or was it action that we were meant to take? If you could please clarify this at your earliest convenience, we will try to get this resolved as soon as possible. Kind regards,

Subject: IRS refund

This is the content of an email: Guys, attached you will find the final plan to meet our origination targets for Q4 consistent with our discussions. It is important that we hit our numbers in order for Enron to meet its targets for the year. Regards
Subject: Q4 Plan