IN: This is an email
Beginning 10/1/2001, TMS stopped excluding city gates locations from the allocation, thereby they would be subject to allocation, where they were not before, this was requested by John Buchanan. Unfortunately or fortunately, NNG customers do not nominate a large portion of their gas to theses city gate locations, rather they nominate to the zone locations, so there is a 99.9% probability, that these city gates would never have to be allocated any way. Currently in TMS we exclude the zone nomination locations (OPS type) from the allocation process. Therefore my question is, since we wanted to include the city gates in the allocation process do we also want to include the zone delivery locations in the allocation process? Bewlow is a list of OPS type points. (234 3026 3041 3042 3044 3047 3049 3050 3051 3054 3055 3056 3057 3058 3059 3061 3062 3063 3064 3065 3066 3067 3068 3069 3071 3072 3075 3076 3077 3079 3080 3082 3083 3084 3085 3086 3087 3088 3089 3091 3093 3094 3095 3096 3097 3098 3099 3100 3101 3102 3103 3104 3108 3109 3110 3111 3112 3113 3114 3115 3116 3117 3119 3120 3122 3123 3124 3126 3184 3363 3438 4816 55935 57178 59043 59271 60226 60228 60230 61427 61704 62818 62819 62820 62821 62862 62906 62956 62957 71488) These points are not eligible for allocations, with the exception of 234 (Nigas).

What is the subject?

OUT: Market Point Allocations
QUESTION: Dear PIRA Client: Our U.S., Europe, Japan, and World Economy presentations on PIRA Online have recently been updated with the latest available data. These charts and tables illustrate trends in key regional economic indicators. They are maintained on PIRA Online as a courtesy to our retainer clients. You can access any of these presentations via PIRA Online (www.pira.com) by logging in and, from the Client Home page, choosing a topic from the "Macro Data"* drop-down menu at the top of the screen. (*If you don't see the "Macro Data" menu items when you log in, go to the FAQ page on PIRA Online and click on question number 4.) If you need a user name and password for PIRA Online, or if you need help logging in, please contact Dyana Rothman at (212) 686-6808, email: support@pira.com. PIRA Energy Group
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: PIRA Macro Economic Presentations
JCharlton@nyiso.com writes to the NYISO_TECH_EXCHANGE Discussion List: Attachment A of the Stage 2 ICAP Manual, as posted, states that on September 28, 2001 the NYISO will inform ICAP Suppliers of the amount of Unforced Capacity they are qualified to offer in the 2001-2002 Winter Capability Period. It also states that LSEs will be notified of the final Unforced Capacity requirements ("UCR") for the upcoming Obligation Procurement Period. Neither statement is correct and a revised Timeline is available for comment. It will be discussed and finalized at the next ICAP Working Group Meeting on October 5. After that October 5 meeting, the updated and corrected Timeline will be posted for approval at the October 25 BIC Meeting. Providing firm final ICAP Supplier UCAP values or LSE UCRs was never feasible in this timeframe. Preliminary LSE UCRs for November were provided to all LSEs on September 21. Final LSE UCRs will be provided on October 9. ICAP Suppliers can estimate their UCAP value based information already supplied. All ICAP Suppliers will have a firm UCAP value for November prior to October 9, if there are no problems with the data submitted and in time to participate in the Monthly Auction to be conducted on October 11. In the meantime, Suppliers can offer as much or as little UCAP for the Winter Capability Period strip auction as they expect to have available, recognizing that their EFORd values will be updated monthly during the Capability Period. Recognize also that there will continue to be Monthly and Deficiency auctions conducted each month during the Capability Period, allowing any Supplier or LSE to clear any long or short postions.
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: ICAP Supplier UCAP and LSE UCAP Requirements
Joe/Sue: We'll need to brief Steve on the fed/state issues tied to the state buying the TX systems of PG&E and Edison prior to his meeting with the Congressional Republicans tomorrow. I'll be driving with Steve from LA to Pasadena (where the meeting is) tomorrow beginning at about 9:30 AM PST (the meeting's at 10:30 AM PST). Could we put together a call-in number at 9:45 or 10 AM PST so you could quickly/briefly brief Steve on the issues prior to the 10:30 AM meeting? Let me know if this works, or if there's a better way to get him up to speed on the issues before the meeting. Thanks very much for helping to pull this together on such short notice. Best,
Answer: What It Takes to State-ize a TX System
Here is an email: Jeff, I've attached a copy of the letter describing the loan of the Madeline O'Connor piece to the McNay Museum in San Antonio this summer. Please let me or Betty Moody at Moody Gallery know if you have any questions. Also, have you had a chance to make a decision about a piece for the niche between the boys' rooms? Thanks. Leigh Edwards
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: Madeline O'Connor
QUESTION: To prepare for the simulation test that will run this week, can you please make sure the necessary people in your group have the appropriate access to the UBS application to perform their job function. For example, I know that the Reports application was used by most groups and that the risk groups also used the Bridge Monitor application. Although we are not expecting any problems to arise, please let me know of any issues your group has logging onto the system. Thank you for your help! Dawn 3-9353
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS:
Access to UBS application