[QUESTION] Premise: "A man in a blue shirt takes a break from digging in a river."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "The man was taking a lunch break." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Just because he is taking a break does not mean that it is a lunch break.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

Q: If "A colorful rickshaw with two patrons on the beach stopping at a coke kiosk." does that mean that "Two people are taking a rickshaw tour."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A: People on a rickshaw are not necessarily taking a rickshaw tour.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

QUESTION: Given the sentence "A bmx biker shoots up into the air." can we conclude that "A man is on a skateboard."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Let's solve it slowly: A BMX biker would not be a man on a skateboard.
The answer is no.

[QUESTION] Can we conclude from "A young asian boy in navy blue traditional costume looks up at a woman wearing modern clothes as they both walk down a paved path." that "Some peoples are walking in park."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
The paved path does not have to be in a park.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

Q: Premise: "Three dogs play with a red ball."
Hypothesis: "Three cats sleep peacefuly in a box."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A: It can either be dog or cats. One cannot sleep and play simultaneously.
The answer is no.

[QUESTION] Premise: "A man on a skateboard is jumping in the air with it."
Hypothesis: "The man is watching someone else skateboard."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
A person generally doesn't watch someone else skageboard while on a skateboard.
The answer is no.