Arthur M. Diamond argues Hayek's problems arise when he goes beyond claims that can be evaluated within economic science. Diamond argued that: "The human mind, Hayek says, is not just limited in its ability to synthesize a vast array of concrete facts, it is also limited in its ability to give a deductively sound ground to ethics. Here is where the tension develops, for he also wants to give a reasoned moral defense of the free market. He is an intellectual skeptic who wants to give political philosophy a secure intellectual foundation. It is thus not too surprising that what results is confused and contradictory."
If it is possible to answer this question, answer it for me (else, reply "unanswerable"): What term does Diamond use to refer to Hayek?
Ah, so.. intellectual skeptic

Three of the women claimed he had grabbed their breasts, a fourth said he placed his hand under her skirt on her buttock. A fifth woman claimed Schwarzenegger tried to take off her bathing suit in a hotel elevator, and the last said he pulled her onto his lap and asked her about a sex act.
If it is possible to answer this question, answer it for me (else, reply "unanswerable"): One woman accused Schwarzenegger of trying to remove what item of clothing?
Ah, so.. bathing suit

Popper held that rationality is not restricted to the realm of empirical or scientific theories, but that it is merely a special case of the general method of criticism, the method of finding and eliminating contradictions in knowledge without ad-hoc-measures. According to this view, rational discussion about metaphysical ideas, about moral values and even about purposes is possible. Popper's student W.W. Bartley III tried to radicalise this idea and made the controversial claim that not only can criticism go beyond empirical knowledge, but that everything can be rationally criticised.
If it is possible to answer this question, answer it for me (else, reply "unanswerable"): What type of knowledge is not the only sphere of rational criticism, according to Popper's student W.W. Bartley III?
Ah, so..
empirical