Teacher: You will be given a context and a verb separated with a newline character, and you have to answer if the given verb can be anchored in time or not. We say a verb can be anchored in the real timeline if and only if a verb happened in the past, is happening now, or is guaranteed to happen in the future. The output should be "Yes" if the verb can be anchored in time and "No" otherwise.
Teacher: Now, understand the problem? If you are still confused, see the following example:
It was followed by Denmark, Norway, Germany, France, Greece, Luxembourg, Spain, Britain, the United States, Iceland, Belgium, Italy, Portugal and Turkey. NATO decided at last year's Madrid summit to (invite) the three eastern European countries to start accession talks.
Verb: invite
Solution: No
Reason: This is a good example. The "invite" is not anchorable. Although NATO decided to invite them, they haven't invited them yet, and it's not guaranteed to happen in the future. They might change their decision later.

Now, solve this instance: Wearing their red Communist Pioneer neckerchiefs, a string of young boys and girls recited poems they wrote for Elian, dubbed Cuba's boy hero and symbolic child, and for Marti, commonly known on the island as Cuba's teacher and apostle. The Communist Party daily Granma compared Elian with revolutionary icon Ernesto Che Guevara and said the boy has been converted forever into a symbol of the crimes and injustices that imperialism is capable of (committing) against an innocent.
Verb: committing
Student:
No