Categorize the comment on the basis of obscenity. If the comment is obscene output Yes, otherwise output No.

[EX Q]: Another UO professor who hates President Trump. Imagine that. And they all have the same boring, redundant talking points.
[EX A]: Yes

[EX Q]: And thank goodness I've been upgraded to profoundly stupid, because that's what it took for you to finally give something close to a specific example. However, I know the owners of Lone Pine, and I ain't buying what you're selling.

Boozer, here's a tip as to how far off the rails your arguments have been: People who never agree with me are agreeing with me. That alone should have you mumbling into your Maypo.
[EX A]: Yes

[EX Q]: Thomas Frank, in his recent book "Listen Liberal", disputes the idea that Obama was so constrained by the Republicans that he couldn't do more. He didn't have to put Wall Street execs in charge of his economic program. He also didn't have to leave troops in Afghanistan and kill people in a number of countries with drones. Or make war on Libya, as urged by Clinton. I don't think Obama really wanted to do more. Like the Clintons, Obama is an elite limousine liberal, comfortable with the way things are. After all, it worked for him.
[EX A]:
No