Bob: here is our status from this mornings outage event. NWPL: we were able to manually input 80% of next days nominations. Since we were not able to EDI, we will have to manually input all successive nominations for the day, as well as all actual scheduled volumes in Unify. We were also only able to get in our 80% of nominations with NWPL's help, as they extended the nomination deadline for us. The other 20% of next day business will be nominated as an intra-day. El Paso: basically the same as NWPL.. We were able to manually get in 100% of nominations, but only because El Paso kept their system open an extra hour for us. Let me know if you need aything else. Thanks.
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: Unify outage
Mark: I'll call shortly. (1) We settle daily with Chase (primarily Chase London and secondarily with Chase NY) on the FX side and often on the IR side. We also have NYMEX settlements. We ran a report for Sept. 11 which I'll email to you and this report reflects payments owed by ENA to Chase. We are currently updating the report for Sept. 12 and nearby settlements. (2) The Chase master (Interest Rate and Currency Exchange Agreement) is old but the amendment (4/5/94) with commodity market disruption language is our standard. (3) The NYMEX web page of 9/12/01 indicated that the exchange would clear trades from the 9/11/01 NUMEX Access session against 9/10/01 settlement prices. I haven't checked today. (4) The Chase master
Answer: The Chase Manhattan Bank and Morgan Guaranty Trust Company of NY
Here is an email: I'm not sure to whom I should tell this information. While at an appointment on Friday afternoon, one person I met with told me hearsay, that he had heard from Dynergy employees that Dynergy had never had any intention of the merger succeeding, that the plan from the start was to get Enron's gas pipelines. Given Enron's suit against Dynergy, I assume this is important to know. If need be, I can tell you the name of the person who told me this, but I cannot vouch for what they said. Sincerely yours,
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: dynergy planned for merger to fail all along
Q: Rick, I believe you went to runzhiemer last year. Larry and I got new company cars last year, so we are not affected. Please, respond to me so I can forward to Bill and start another little table for future reference. Mike
Propose a subject line
A: Runzhiemer
IN: Pat, your credit worksheets reflect ENA posting cash. Is this a mistake? I am trying to revise these draft masters and then I will tackle TGS. I still have severe laryngitis so I cannot speak but I can communicate via e-mail or a paralegal. Thanks. Sara

Generate a subject line.

OUT: Hidroelectrica Diamante SA
IN: This is an email
Dear Sir, As you know Lehman Brothers is one of the most prestigious investment banks on Wall Street. On a regular basis Lehman brings new companies public in many industries. One area that has received great interest lately is Master Limited Partnerships. These vehicles generally have high yields (in the 10% range) with tax advantages. In today's environment of low interest rates that is extremely attractive. If you would like to learn more the next time we offer one by prospectus please e-mail or call. All the best! !

What is the subject?

OUT:
Master Limited Partnerships