IN: This is an email
Mary Kay and Drew, please see Christine's message below. This language is very similar to language that NNG has used to address the change-in-rates issue. I do not believe it creates a negotiated rates issue. Please let me know as soon as possible if you have any concerns. It is important that we work something out with Phillips today. By the way, I asked Christine if she had asked Phillips to 1) give up their right of first refusal and 2) agree to our new capacity release language (i.e. TW gets the upside if capacity is released at a higher rate) in exchange for us making this compromise. She feels that it would be inappropriate to ask them because the language below does not quite give Phillips what they had requested originally (that is, a negotiated rate).

What is the subject?

OUT: Additional Phillips Language

IN: This is an email
Lisa: Here sre the latest versions of the KCS amendments. I have taken the word draft off. Stacy: There are some blanks that need to be filled in. Could you please call or e-mail Lisa with the info? Thanks.

What is the subject?

OUT: KCS Amendments

IN: This is an email
Hi Sheila, Shall we try to get the Enron groups together to discuss the approach we want to take with GE in our next phone call? If so, please advise of any time you have available on Monday, and I'll get it set up. Thanks,

What is the subject?

OUT:
GE Meeting/ premeeting