Here is a premise:
New Yorker writer Remnick's sequel to his Pulitzer Prize-winning Lenin's Tomb is a compelling postscript (Walter Laqueur, Los Angeles Times ). Reviewers focus on Remnick's access to political insiders, especially his extended interviews with Mikhail Gorbachev, Vladimir Zhirinovsky, and Gennady Zyuganov.

Here is a hypothesis:
Remnick's sequal was worse than the original

Is it possible to conclude that if the premise is true, then so is the hypothesis?
no