QUESTION: Given the sentence "A laughing woman prepares to carefully remove a jenga block from its teetering tower." can we conclude that "The family laughs after dinner."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Let's solve it slowly: A single laughing woman cannot be an entire family. One cannot carefully remove an item while laughing.
The answer is no.

[QUESTION] Can we conclude from "A white dog is walking down a dirt road." that "A white dog is walking in a grassy field."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
A field is not a road and they cannot exist in the same location at the same time.
The answer is no.

Q: Given the sentence "Two young men do cycle figures on ramp." can we conclude that "Two guys are playing tennis."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A: The two men cannot be doing cycle figures and playing tennis at the same time.
The answer is no.

QUESTION: Premise: "A man works in front of a large crane."
Hypothesis: "The man is operating the crane."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?

Let's solve it slowly: One cannot be operating the crane and in front of the crane simultaneously.
The answer is no.

[QUESTION] Premise: "A man with a blue shirt and a straw hat near a creek is smoking a cigarette."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A farmer near a creek is smoking a cigarette." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Not every man in a blue shirt and a straw hat is a farmer.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

Q: Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "Two dogs run and play together on a narrow dirt path in the middle of a field."
Hypothesis: "Two animals are playing in the dirt in a field."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
A:
Two dogs are animals as part of the total description of them playing together in (narrow) dirt (path) in (middle) a field.
The answer is yes.