Premise:
"It's more credible because it is more limited and because it's more plausible that you'll do something if it's something you have a good reason to do, whether you've said you'll do it or not."
Hypothesis: If you decide you definitely don't want to do something, we'll find ways around it.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

it is not possible to tell

input question: 'Oh, yes,' The Colonel nodded quickly. If this premise is true, does that tell us:"The Colonel answered no."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: no

Question:
Based on the premise "If you're lucky enough to gain entry, you'll see the only major work of art on the whole the Gothic triptych, or altar retable, which is attributed to the artist Rodrigo de Osona from Valencia.", can we conclude that "Rodrigo de Osona, from Valencia, made a work of art which is now on the Gothic triptych."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
yes

Question: Sentence A: You will find all the paraphernalia of kilts, bagpipes, and ceremonial arms along with traditional Scottish food, whisky, and dancing.

Sentence B: Kilts, bagpipes, and ceremonial arms are things one should not expect to find.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question: But God gave man dominion over the beasts of the If an animal has economic utility, we should farm it.
But God made man the lowest of all animals.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Problem: Here is a premise:
I feel like a fool.

Here is a hypothesis:
I am feeling foolish right now.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer:
yes