TASK DEFINITION: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.
PROBLEM: Comment: "What did all those investigations lead to? WHAT? The Republicans investigated the crap out of all of those conspiracies and what charges did they bring?"

To paraphrase the famous battle cry of John Paul Jones who had asked for a fast ship to go in harms way, "We have not yet BEGUN to investigate Felony-Shrillary".

Don't be surprised if the Mueller investigation you lefties lusted after for so long begins to shine the lamp of truth on what Felony-Shrillary did and why she did it - - how fitting THAT would be, eh wot? Hoist on YOUR petard!

SOLUTION: Obscene

PROBLEM: Comment: Who really gives a damn!!! I'm sure Obama one said Michelle's pants make her ass look hughe!!!!!

SOLUTION: Obscene

PROBLEM: Comment: The words of the author refer to two, not one.

You're trying to get me to leave the author's words, and address your rather prolix comment.

So let me do that.

"Christian faith requires maintaining a delicate balance"

No, it requires full acceptance of a single difficult truth, using all that our intellect can provide in the matter, and for what it can't do, using a faith that we ask for from God, who is One.

Second, there is no "evolving" understanding of Jesus's divinity. This matter was definitively and formally put to rest (amid much heresy not unlike some of the author's and your words) at the Council of Nicea in the 300s.

Just pray over the Athanasian Creed for a while, perhaps in front of the Tabernackle, and some bad ideas will be set aright.

SOLUTION:
Non-obscene