Question:
Based on the premise "Many of you wallowed in the olfactory, particularly in the odor of corruption and fish.", can we conclude that "You wallowed in the odor of corruption because you rigged the basketball game. "? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
it is not possible to tell

Question: Sentence A: uh-huh i'd think so

Sentence B: The report is complete and covers everything.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question: It stops at a number of villas en route.
It is a non-stop express service.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Problem: Here is a premise:
The Patio de Armas, or arsenal square, as the quad is called, leads into the first of a number of wide, open plazas which come upon you unannounced as you climb the maze of narrow alleys.

Here is a hypothesis:
It does not lead to a number of wide open plazas.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Sentence 1: yeah i think that the NFL is going to use that league as uh uh kind of like as a minor league to recruit players

Sentence 2: That league will be a good way for the NFL to see what players are strong.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Premise:
"That is, no one would be able to react to new information."
Hypothesis: No one would have the ability to respond when new information is available.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
yes