In this task, you are given text for US Congressional and California state bills, your task is to generate a summary for this bill.

Input: Consider Input: SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ''Consumer Telephone Records
Protection Act of 2006''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

Congress finds that--
(1) telephone records can be of great use to criminals
because the information contained in call logs listed in such
records include a wealth of personal information;
(2) many call logs reveal the names of many users' doctors,
public and private relationships, business associates, and
more;
(3) although other personal information, such as social
security numbers may appear in public documents, which can be
accessed by data brokers, the only warehouse of telephone
records is located at the telephone companies themselves; and
(4) telephone records may be accessed without authorization
of the customer by--
(A) an employee of the telephone company selling
the data;
(B) ''pretexting'', whereby a data broker or other
person pretends to be the owner of the phone and
convinces the telephone company's employees to release
the data to them; or
(C) unauthorized access of accounts via the
Internet; and
(5) because telephone companies encourage customers to
manage their accounts online, many set up the online capability
in advance. Many customers never access their Internet
accounts, however. If someone seeking the information activates
the account before the customer, he or she can gain unfettered
access to the telephone records and call logs of that customer.

SEC. 3. PRIVACY PROTECTION FOR CUSTOMER INFORMATION OF
TELECOMMUNICATIONS CARRIERS.

(a) Prohibition on Obtaining Customer Information by False
Pretenses.--It shall be unlawful for any person to obtain or attempt to
obtain, or cause to be disclosed or attempt to cause to be disclosed to
any person, customer proprietary network information relating to any
other person by--
(1) making a false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or
representation to an officer, employee, or agent of a
telecommunications carrier; or
(2) by providing, through any means including the Internet,
any document or other information to a telecommunications
carrier or an officer, employee, or agent of a
telecommunications carrier, knowing that the document or other
information is forged, counterfeit, lost, or stolen, was
obtained fraudulently or without the customer's consent, or
contains a false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or
representation.
(b) Prohibition on Solicitation of a Person to Obtain Customer
Information Under False Pretenses.--It shall be unlawful to request a
person to obtain customer proprietary network information of a
telecommunications carrier, knowing that the person will obtain, or
attempt to obtain, the information from the telecommunications carrier
in the manner described in subsection (a).
(c) Prohibition on Sale or Other Disclosure of Customer Information
Obtained Under False Pretenses.--It shall be unlawful for any person to
sell customer proprietary network information relating to any other
person, knowing that such information was obtained in the manner
described in subsection (a).
(d) Nonapplicability to Law Enforcement Agencies.--No provision of
this section shall be construed so as to prevent any action by a law
enforcement agency, or any officer, employee, or agent of such agency,
to obtain customer proprietary network information of a
telecommunications carrier in connection with the performance of
official duties of the agency.

SEC. 4. TELECOMMUNICATIONS CARRIER NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENT.

Section 222 of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 222) is
amended--
(1) by redesignating subsection (h) as subsection (i); and
(2) by inserting after subsection (g) the following new
subsection:
''(h) Notice of Violations.--The Commission shall by regulation
require each telecommunications carrier to notify the customer of any
incidents in which such telecommunications carrier becomes or is made
aware in which customer proprietary network information relating to
such customer is disclosed to someone other than the customer in
violation of this section or section 3 of the Consumer Telephone
Records Protection Act of 2006.''.

SEC. 5. ENFORCEMENT BY THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION.

A violation of section 3 shall be treated as an unfair or deceptive
act or practice in violation of section 5 of the Federal Trade
Commission Act (15 U.S.C. 45). All of the functions and powers of the
Federal Trade Commission under that Act are available to the Commission
to enforce compliance by any person with such section, irrespective of
whether that person is engaged in commerce or meets any other
jurisdictional tests in the Federal Trade Commission Act, including the
power to enforce the provisions of such section in the same manner as
if the violation had been a violation of a Federal Trade Commission
trade regulation rule.

SEC. 6. CRIMINAL PENALTY.

(a) In General.--Whoever knowingly and intentionally violates
section 3 shall be fined in accordance with title 18, United States
Code, or imprisoned for not more than 5 years, or both.
(b) Enhanced Penalties for Aggravated Cases.--Whoever violates
section 3 while violating another law of the United States or as part
of a pattern of any illegal activity involving more than $100,000, or
more than 50 customers of a telecommunications carrier, in a 12-month
period shall be fined twice the amount provided in section 3571 of
title 18, or imprisoned for not more than 10 years, or both.

SEC. 7. DEFINITIONS.

As used in this Act, the following definitions apply:
(1) Customer proprietary network information.--The term
''customer proprietary network information'' has the meaning
given such term in section 222(h)(1) of the Communications Act
of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 222(h)(1)).
(2) Telecommunications carrier.--The term
''telecommunications carrier'' has the meaning given such term
in section 3(44) of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C.
153(44)).

Output: Consumer Telephone Records Protection Act of 2006 - Prohibits any person from obtaining or causing the disclosure of, or requesting another person to obtain, customer proprietary network information relating to another person by: (1) making a false statement to a telecommunications carrier; or (2) providing any information knowing that it is counterfeit, that it was obtained fraudulently or without the customer's consent, or that it contains a false statement. Prohibits a person from selling customer information relating to any other person knowing it was obtained in such manner.

Amends the Communications Act of 1934 to direct the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to require each telecommunications carrier to notify a customer when proprietary network information relating to such customer is disclosed in violation of such prohibitions.

Treats a violation as an unfair or deceptive act or practice in violation of the Federal Trade Commission Act. Gives all of the functions and powers of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) under that Act to the FCC to enforce compliance. Prescribes penalties, which double for violations that are part of a pattern of illegal activity.

Input: Consider Input: SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ''Muhammad Ali Commemorative Coin
Act''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

Congress finds that--
(1) Muhammad Ali was an Olympic gold medalist, 3-time World
Heavyweight Champion boxer, and one of the most celebrated and
well-known athletes in American history;
(2) Muhammad Ali showed, beyond his impressive fighting
prowess in the boxing ring, even greater courage and tenacity
as an advocate outside the ring;
(3) Muhammad Ali was a great philanthropist and a strong
champion of peace, equality, and freedom;
(4) Muhammad Ali remains an icon of freedom of conscience;
(5) Muhammad Ali was a prominent African American of the
Muslim faith, and was, and continues to be, a role model to the
citizens of the United States of all races, ethnicities, and
religions;
(6) Muhammad Ali used his fame to advocate for humanitarian
causes in audiences with world leaders ranging from religious
leaders to heads of state; and
(7) Muhammad Ali inspired people around the globe in
displaying the same vibrant and larger-than-life character and
dedication in spite of his physical ailments.

SEC. 3. COIN SPECIFICATIONS.

(a) Denominations.--The Secretary of the Treasury (hereafter in
this Act referred to as the ''Secretary'') shall mint and issue the
following coins in commemoration of Muhammad Ali:
(1) $5 gold coins.--Not more than 100,000 $5 coins, which
shall--
(A) weigh 8.359 grams;
(B) have a diameter of 0.850 inches; and
(C) contain 90 percent gold and 10 percent alloy.
(2) $1 silver coins.--Not more than 350,000 $1 coins, which
shall--
(A) weigh 26.73 grams;
(B) have a diameter of 1.500 inches; and
(C) contain not less than 90 percent silver.
(b) Legal Tender.--The coins minted under this Act shall be legal
tender, as provided in section 5103 of title 31, United States Code.
(c) Numismatic Items.--For purposes of section 5134 and 5136 of
title 31, United States Code, all coins minted under this Act shall be
considered to be numismatic items.

SEC. 4. DESIGN OF COINS.

(a) Design Requirements.--
(1) In general.--The design of the coins minted under this
Act shall be emblematic of the life and legacy of Muhammad Ali.
(2) Design and inscriptions.--On each coin minted under
this Act there shall be--
(A) a designation of the value of the coin;
(B) an inscription of the year 2020; and
(C) inscriptions of the words ''Liberty'', ''In God
We Trust'', ''United States of America'', and ''E
Pluribus Unum''.
(b) Selection.--The design for the coins minted under this Act
shall be--
(1) selected by the Secretary after consultation with the
Muhammad Ali Center; and
(2) reviewed by the Citizens Coinage Advisory Committee.

SEC. 5. ISSUANCE OF COINS.

(a) Quality of Coins.--Coins minted under this Act shall be issued
in uncirculated and proof qualities.
(b) Mint Facility.--Only 1 facility of the United States Mint may
be used to strike any particular quality of the coins minted under this
Act.
(c) Period for Issuance.--The Secretary may issue coins minted
under this Act only during the 1-year period beginning on January 1,
2020.

SEC. 6. SALE OF COINS.

(a) Sale Price.--The coins issued under this Act shall be sold by
the Secretary at a price equal to the sum of--
(1) the face value of the coins;
(2) the surcharge provided in section 7(a) with respect to
such coins; and
(3) the cost of designing and issuing the coins (including
labor, materials, dies, use of machinery, overhead expenses,
marketing, and shipping).
(b) Bulk Sales.--The Secretary shall make bulk sales of the coins
issued under this Act at a reasonable discount.
(c) Prepaid Orders.--
(1) In general.--The Secretary shall accept prepaid orders
for the coins minted under this Act before the issuance of such
coins.
(2) Discount.--Sale prices with respect to prepaid orders
under paragraph (1) shall be at a reasonable discount.

SEC. 7. SURCHARGES.

(a) In General.--All sales of coins issued under this Act shall
include a surcharge of--
(1) $35 per coin for the $5 coin; and
(2) $10 per coin for the $1 coin.
(b) Distribution.--Subject to section 5134(f)(1) of title 31,
United States Code, all surcharges received by the Secretary from the
sale of coins issued under this Act shall be promptly paid by the
Secretary as follows:
(1) Eighty percent of the surcharges shall be paid to the
Muhammad Ali Center in Louisville, Kentucky, to ensure growth
and innovation in museum programming to research, promote, and
educate on the legacy of Muhammad Ali.
(2) Ten percent of the surcharges shall be paid to the
Muhammad Ali Institute for Peace and Justice at the University
of Louisville to advance the work, study and practice of
peacebuilding, social justice, and violence prevention through
the development of innovative educational programs, training,
service, and research.
(3) Ten percent of the surcharges shall be paid to the
Muhammad Ali Parkinson Center (MAPC) and Movement Disorder
Clinic to continue serving as a resource for Parkinson's
disease patients and their families through the provision of
diagnosis, treatments, research, and education.
(c) Audit.--The Comptroller General of the United States shall have
the right to examine such books, records, documents, and other data of
each of the organizations referred to in subsection (b) as may be
related to the expenditures of amounts paid under that subsection.
(d) Limitations.--Notwithstanding subsection (a), no surcharge may
be included with respect to the issuance under this Act of any coin
during a calendar year if, as of the time of such issuance, the
issuance of such coin would result in the number of commemorative coin
programs issued during such year to exceed the annual 2 commemorative
coin program issuance limitation under section 5112(m)(1) of title 31,
United States Code (as in effect on the date of the enactment of this
Act). The Secretary of the Treasury may issue guidance to carry out
this subsection.

Output: Muhammad Ali Commemorative Coin Act This bill requires the Department of the Treasury to mint and issue commemorative coins that emblemize the life and legacy of Muhammad Ali. Surcharges received from the sale of these coins shall be paid to: (1) the Muhammad Ali Center in Louisville, Kentucky; (2) the Muhammad Ali Institute for Peace and Justice at the University of Louisville; and (3) the Muhammad Ali Parkinson Center and Movement Disorder Clinic.

Input: Consider Input: SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ''Reducing Global Warming Pollution
from Vehicles Act of 2008''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS AND PURPOSES.

(a) Findings.--Congress finds that--
(1) the State of California has regulated motor vehicle air
emissions more stringently than the Federal Government for more
than 40 years;
(2) in recognition of the pioneering role of the State in
protecting public health and welfare from motor vehicle
emissions, Congress enacted section 209(b) of the Clean Air Act
(42 U.S.C. 7543(b)) that allows the Administrator of the
Environmental Protection Agency (referred to in this Act as the
''Administrator'') to waive Federal preemption of motor vehicle
standards established by the State;
(3) on December 21, 2005, the State requested a waiver of
preemption under that Act for the regulation of the State to
control greenhouse gas emissions from motor vehicles;
(4) the regulation of the State requires a reduction in the
emissions of greenhouse gases from cars and light trucks sold
in the State;
(5) once a waiver is granted to the State of California for
that regulation, other States may adopt the vehicle emission
standards established by the State of California;
(6) as of the date of introduction of this Act--
(A) 14 other States have adopted or are adopting
the California standards, including Arizona,
Connecticut, Florida, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts,
New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Pennsylvania,
Rhode Island, Vermont, and Washington;
(B) at least 4 additional States are moving toward
adopting the California standards, including Colorado,
Delaware, Illinois, and Utah; and
(C) taken together, those 19 States represent more
than half of the population of the United States;
(7) the comments submitted to the Administrator
overwhelmingly supported the request of the State of California
for a waiver;
(8) according to legal papers filed by the California
Attorney General, of the approximately 98,000 comments in the
docket of the Environmental Protection Agency, docket, more
than 99.9 percent supported the petition of the State;
(9) notwithstanding that support, on December 19, 2007,
Administrator Stephen Johnson took the extraordinary step of
denying the request of the State, dated December 21, 2005, for
the waiver;
(10) the flat denial by the Administrator of the waiver
request was unprecedented;
(11) according to the Congressional Research Service, the
State of California has requested waivers of preemption under
section 209(b) of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7543(b)) for
vehicle emission standards more than 50 times since that
provision was enacted, and the Administrator has never outright
denied such a request, but instead always granted the requests,
in whole or in part;
(12) the denial of the Administrator of the waiver
reportedly overrode the overwhelming evidence presented by the
technical and legal staff of the Environmental Protection
Agency;
(13) the Administrator sought to justify the denial of the
waiver by arguing that the waiver would create a ''confusing
patchwork'' of State regulations;
(14) in fact, no such patchwork would result from the
granting of the waiver because, under the Clean Air Act (42
U.S.C. 6401 et seq.), if the waiver were granted, there would
continue to be 2 standards for vehicles, as there have been for
30 years--a weaker Federal standard, and a more stringent
California standard adopted by many States across the United
States;
(15) the benefits of permitting the State of California to
establish more stringent vehicle standards, which are
subsequently adopted by other States, are well documented;
(16) the National Academy of Sciences found in 2006 that in
''forcing technology development, California has been a
laboratory for emissions-control innovations. . . . The
original reasons for which Congress authorized California to
have a separate set of standards remain valid. . . . California
should continue its pioneering role in setting mobile-source
emissions standards. The role will aid the State's efforts to
achieve air quality goals and will allow it to continue to be a
proving ground for new emissions-control technologies that
benefit California and the rest of the Nation.'';
(17) the Administrator also sought to justify the denial of
the waiver by arguing that the national fuel economy standards
for vehicles enacted by the Energy Independence and Security
Act of 2007 (Public Law 110-140) would be ''more effective'' at
reducing emissions than the California standards;
(18) however, an analysis by the California Air Resources
Board shows that the California standards, once fully adopted,
would result, by 2020, in approximately twice as large a
cumulative reduction of carbon dioxide emissions in California
as, and more than an 80 percent greater reduction in carbon
dioxide emissions nationally than, would be achieved under the
Federal program;
(19) the argument of the Administrator that national fuel
economy standards eliminate the need for vehicle greenhouse gas
emission controls also runs counter to the analysis of the
Supreme Court in the landmark April 2007 decision of
Massachusetts v. Environmental Protection Agency (127 S. Ct.
1438), in which the Supreme Court--
(A) rejected the argument of the Administrator that
the authority of the Department of Transportation to
regulate vehicle fuel efficiency undercuts the
authority of the Administrator to regulate greenhouse
gases from vehicles; and
(B) noted that the fact ''that DOT [the Department
of Transportation] sets mileage standards in no way
licenses EPA [the Environmental Protection Agency] to
shirk its environmental responsibilities. EPA has been
charged with protecting the public's 'health' and
'welfare,' . . . a statutory obligation wholly
independent of DOT's mandate to promote energy
efficiency . . . The two obligations may overlap, but
there is no reason to think the two agencies cannot
both administer their obligations and yet avoid
inconsistency.''; and
(20) it is the sense of Congress that the denial by the
Administrator of the request by the State of California for the
waiver is not supported by science, precedent, or applicable
law.
(b) Purposes.--The purposes of this Act are--
(1) to permit the State of California and other States to
immediately proceed under the regulation of the State of
California to control greenhouse gas emissions from motor
vehicles, rather than forcing the States to litigate for what
could be several years to vindicate their rights, while climate
change continues to threaten public health and the environment;
and
(2) to provide certainty to automakers, the States, and the
public about future regulatory requirements for greenhouse gas
emissions from motor vehicles.

SEC. 3. WAIVER OF PREEMPTION FOR CALIFORNIA GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSION
REGULATION FOR VEHICLES.

Section 209 of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7543) is amended by
adding at the end the following:
''(f) Waiver.--Notwithstanding subsection (b) or any other
provision of law, the application for a waiver of preemption dated
December 21, 2005, submitted to the Administrator pursuant to
subsection (b) by the State of California for the regulation of that
State to control greenhouse gas emissions from motor vehicles shall be
considered to be approved.''.
Output: Reducing Global Warming Pollution from Vehicles Act of 2008 - Amends the Clean Air Act to approve the application of the state of California for a waiver of federal preemption of its motor vehicle emission standards.