Premise:
"It is evident! "
Hypothesis: It's obvious.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

yes

input question: but it's not but it's not set up as a giveaway if it were set up as giveaway and it was something that i mean our our President and our leaders could be seeking God saying God is it your will for us to bless this nation with this money is it your will this money and your will for us to give to them and i believe if we gave it no strings attached that God would bless our nation but because we're our motive is interest our motive is not pure it just backfires i mean none of these nations have paid us back it be do you understand it's i guess it's a principle of giving and receiving you give it no strings attached and they may never give you anything back but because there's no strings attached it like gives them a freedom to give us something back and it might not be money it might be um no taxes on our things our computers going into their nation it might come back in another way but it would be come back bu t because we're loaning it i think that's the problem and i don't mean give it to everybody that asks use a lot of discernment don't give money to every nation you know what i'm saying i think we're loaning money to too many nations but i think if we gave to a few select ones that really needed it that it would work out better for us and for them and so now we have all these nations that owe us all this money and so i just think we're never going to get that back you know do you understand If this premise is true, does that tell us:"I believe it would be better for us to always demand things in return for what we give."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: no

Question:
Based on the premise "House Rules Committee Chairman Gerald Solomon, R-N.Y., has so far refused to schedule a hearing on Barr's resolution.", can we conclude that "House Rules Committee Chairman Gerald Solomon has yet to schedule a hearing on Barr's resolution."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
yes

Question: Sentence A: exist at an esthetic altitude that few living painters will ever reach (Hilton Kramer, the New York Observer ). (MoMA plugs the show here.)

Sentence B: The esthetic are better than any other living painter.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Question: Jon reloaded his guns again and holstered one to draw his rapier.
Jon's guns were reloaded.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Problem: Here is a premise:
LSC also suggested that the planners develop ways to involve more clients and community representatives in the planning process and develop plans to expand their funding base.

Here is a hypothesis:
LSC said planners should find ways to get clients removed from the planning.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer:
no