Problem: Here is a premise:
Besides the CBS suit, it won $1,700 plus legal fees from USA Today after the newspaper reprinted the I Have a Dream speech without permission.

Here is a hypothesis:
USA today printed the famous speech without permission.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Sentence 1: When the government failed to fulfill promises to compensate investors, rioters pillaged the capital, Tirana, and battled government-organized militias.

Sentence 2: Rioters were thankful since the government failed to fulfill promises to compensate investors.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: no

Question:
At the level of policy, Wachtler has written a fine book, a worthy dissertation on the American penal system.

Does it follow that "Wachtler has written a book discussing the American penal system."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
yes

Q: If It was clearly a difficult admission., can we say that "It was upsetting to everyone involved."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A: it is not possible to tell

Premise:
"A thousand years from now, if robot historians want to know what life was really like in late-20 th -century America, they will look to Life in Hell and The Simpsons . No, there were no talking rabbits, and human hair was not sculpted into yellow spikes or blue pylons (well, not that often anyway)."
Hypothesis: Life in Hell and the Simpsons may be regarded as historical fact in the future.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

yes

Sentence 1: You've been too darned close about the whole business, Julius accused him.

Sentence 2: Julius accused him of being too close to the business.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer:
yes