You will be given a context and a verb separated with a newline character, and you have to answer if the given verb can be anchored in time or not. We say a verb can be anchored in the real timeline if and only if a verb happened in the past, is happening now, or is guaranteed to happen in the future. The output should be "Yes" if the verb can be anchored in time and "No" otherwise.

Example Input: Ironically, NATO's three newest members just a decade ago were still under the Soviet umbrella. Czech Foreign Minister Jan Kavan said he (was) in nearby Kansas City working with the anti-Soviet undergound in 1968 when Russian troops swept through Praque in the occupation of Czechoslovakia.
Verb: was
Example Output: Yes

Example Input: Once Gonzalez comes to the United States _ it would be preferable if he went to Miami rather than to Washington _ only the most obdurate foes of Castro can argue that Elian should not be reunited with him. Gonzalez's arrival should also help clear the way for the Justice Department to make arrangements to (transfer) custody of the child.
Verb: transfer
Example Output: No

Example Input: The Security Council condemned the bombing of the U.S. embassies in Kenya and Tanzania on Thursday and called on all states to cooperate with authorities in finding those responsible. A resolution, co-sponsored by Kenya, Tanzania and the United States and unanimously adopted, (expresses) its deep sorrow, sympathy and condolences to the families of the innocent victims of the terrorist bomb attacks at this difficult time.
Verb: expresses
Example Output:
Yes