Question: (CNN) -- We've all done things in our past we might prefer the general public not talk about, but only the lucky few get to be the targets of whole industries dedicated to digging those things up.

Targets like celebrities.

Politicians.

And apparently CEOs, that is if the abrupt resignation of Mozilla's new chief Brendan Eich is any indication.

For many, the story of Eich -- who stepped down this week amid criticism of his contribution to a 2008 initiative to ban same-sex marriage-- is one of freedom of speech trampled by the intolerant.

I don't see it that way.

Don't get me wrong; to paraphrase Voltaire, I disagree with Eich's views on marriage equality but will defend to the death his First Amendment right to express them. But as I've written in the past, the First Amendment doesn't protect him, Mozilla, or anyone else from others' using their First Amendment right to signal their disapproval.

To me, Eich's case is about the power of information, and how -- with technology, 24-hour news and social media- -everyone's past is just a hashtag away from being the present.

Sometimes this is a good thing for the public, like the digging up of David Duke's KKK past as he attempted to climb the political ladder. Sometimes the information is significant, but used mainly to score points against a political opponent, as in the GOP's escalation of the Bill Clinton-Monica Lewinsky saga. But more often than not it's about gossip to sell magazines or get clicks on a website. 1. Who was a CEO?
2. Of what company?
3. Was he fired?
4. How did he leave?
5. What did he contribute to?
6. Wanting to do what?
7. Did the author agree with his thoughts on this matter?
8. But what did the author think he should be able to do?
9. Which is protected by what?
10. Does that also protect people who don't agree with him?
11. Who was a part of the KKK?
12. What was he trying to do?
13. Who else has been exposed?
14. Who increased the attention on that?
15. How can people share things that happened in the past? Provide a numbered list of answers.
****
A numbered of answers: 1. Brendan Eich
2. Mozilla's
3. No
4. resigned
5. a 2008 initiative
6. to ban same-sex marriage
7. No
8. his right to express them.
9. First Amendment
10. Technically yes, but author doesn't think so.
11. David Duke
12. climb the political ladder
13. Bill Clinton-Monica Lewinsky
14. the GOP's
15. with technology

Q: (CNN)Congo looks set for the quarterfinals after securing its first victory at the finals of the Africa Cup of Nations for 41 years with an upset 1-0 win over favored Gabon Wednesday.

Gabon, who topped Group A after an opening victory over Burkina Faso, fell victim to a Prince Oniangue goal early in the second half and wayward finishing.

The vital win in Congo's first appearance at AFCON since 2000 leaves Claude Le Roy's team needing just a draw from its final group game against Burkina Faso to reach the quarterfinals.

Oniangue, who plays for Reims in the French top-flight, grabbed his goal after Gabon failed to clear a 48th minute corner.

Gabon should have leveled midway through the half when Frederic Bulot sent a shot wide with the goal at his mercy.

Bulot's first time volley early in the match had nearly put Gabon into an early lead but it was turned over the crossbar by Christoffer Mafoumbi in the Congo goal.

Mafoumbi also made a fine save from Gabon's star player Pierre-Emerick Aubameyang after a free kick, but after the break Congo came more into the game and deserved its victory to move onto four points after two games.

Earlier, 2013 runner-up Burkina Faso and host Equatorial Guinea played to a goalless draw, leaving both sides looking for victories in the final round of group matches to advance further in the 16-team competition.

Burkina Faso is left with just one point from two games and seemingly out of luck after Alain Traore twice saw first half efforts strike the woodwork.

1. CNN
2. yes
3. 41 years
4. 1-0
5. Gabon
6. Wednesday
7. Africa Cup of Nations
8. Group A
9. Burkina Faso
10. Prince Oniangue
11. early in the second half
12. 2000
13. Congo
14. he sent a shot wide
15. leveled midway
16. yes
17. yes
18. Gabon's star player
19. four
20. Equatorial Guinea

Numbered questions:
1. what news agency reported this?
2. Is the congo going to the quarterfinals?
3. How long had it been since they accomplished this last?
4. What was the score?
5. Who was the opponent?
6. When was this?
7. Which tournament?
8. Which group was Gabon in?
9. Who did they beat?
10. Who scored the only goal?
11. When?
12. When did Congo last play in the tournament?
13. Who does Oniangue play for?
14. What did Frederic Bulot do?
15. What should have Gabon done?
16. is Christoffer Mafoumbi on a team?
17. Did he make a save?
18. Who is Pierre-Emerick Aubameyang?
19. How many points did they after two games?
20. What country was the host?

input: CHAPTER II.

TROUBLE.

As Caleb walked along by the side of Raymond, and came upon the bridge, he was seen both by his grandmother, who happened to be standing at the door, and also at the same instant, by the two boys, Dwight and David, who were just then coming home from school. Dwight, seeing Caleb walking along so sadly, his clothes and hair thoroughly drenched, set up a shout, and ran towards him over the bridge. David was of a more quiet and sober turn, and he followed more slowly, but with a face full of surprise and curiosity.

Madam Rachel, too, perceived that her little grandson had been in the brook, and she said, "Can it be possible that he has disobeyed?" Then, again, the next thought was, "Well, if he has, he has been punished for it pretty severely, and so I will treat him kindly."

David and Dwight came eagerly up, with exclamations, and questions without number. This made poor Caleb feel worse and worse--he wanted to get home as soon as possible, and he could not tell the boys all the story there; and presently Raymond, finding that he could not get by them very well, took him up in his arms, and carried him towards the house, David and Dwight following behind. Caleb expected that his grandmother would think him very much to blame, and so, as he came near enough to speak to her, he raised his head from Raymond's shoulder, and began to say, 1. Where was Caleb coming from?
2. Who was he walking with?
3. Where were they when he was spotted?
4. Who saw him?
5. Anyone else?
6. Was he told not to go to the brook?
7. Did his grandmather intend to punish him?
8. How did she decided he needed to be treated?
9. Were Caleb's clothes dry?
10. How did he feel?
11. Was he eager to get anywhere?
12. Where?
13. Did he run?
14. How did he get home?
15. Was anyone else with them?
16. Was Caleb scared that he would be in trouble?
17. Did his grandmother believe that he had suffered natural consequences?
18. Did she feel they were minor?
19. Where had David and Dwight come from when they spotted Caleb? Return numbered answers in your output.

output:
1. The brook
2. Raymond
3. The bridge
4. His grandmother
5. Dwight and David
6. Yes
7. Probably not
8. kindly
9. No
10. He was sad.
11. Yes
12. Home
13. no
14. Raymond carried him.
15. David and Dwight followed behind.
16. Yes
17. Yes
18. WNo
19. School