Hi, I need your help. I would like you guys to prioritize the "first 10" and the "second 10" firms that we would like to change our existing trading agreements with to allow all of us to use ConfirmLogic. I would like this process to go forward even if the counterparty has not yet signed up for the module. To my mind, the legal change simply gives us both the option (and perhaps the preference, but not the obligation) to use the module to serve as a legal confirmation. Please let me know if there is anything I can do to help speed up the process. As I understand it, only Sempra currently has proposed changes in front of them. I would like us to have proposed changes in front of the top 20 clients by September 20. Many thanks, Tom
Answer: Contract Amendments for ConfirmLogic
Kam/Alejandra, This deal should probably be zero effective Nov 2001. I believe it's a dupe to 139683 on CGAS..Volumes now are zero on 139693. It's a sale to Hopewell that was created in December 1999 but it has a hedge N59964 and a demand charge attached to it that should be taken out. THANKS
Answer: Deal 139693
Gerald/Ellen Please review & edit as necessary. If possible, once "buffed to a shine", I'd like to be able to insert this language into the GTC Confirm template above Notice information. This particular scenario is for Unimark LLC (deal #1146397). Language Take 1: Payment Terms: As hereto agreed, payment by Buyer to Seller for gas received by Buyer during the preceding calendar month shall be made payable by wire transfer on the 25th Day of the Month following delivery. If the due date for any payment to be made under this Agreement is not a Business Day, the due date for such payment shall be the following Business Day. Please let me know as soon as possible as this is a Nov Production deal that has not yet been confirm & also due to the prior conversations Settlements, Judy, Lisa & Contracts has had with the CP. Thank you!! !
Answer: Special Language for ENA Upstream GTCs: Pymt Due Date = 25th
Ken - Although I cannot pretend to feel the pressure you have felt over the past year, I do appreciate your interest in the employees as expressed in the current decision regarding the Change of Control Provision. In light of the current circumstances, it is an honorable action. I wouldn't be here (4 yrs; as an Analyst, then and currently an Associate) if I didn't believe in Enron and would have left long ago. Enron has had a profound impact in more than the energy sector, and will continue regardless of Enron's form, simply based on its historical innovation. To have our health and have had the opportunity to do what Enron has done is astonishing, especially these days. I wish you the best in time ahead. Be well, Ilan
Answer:
Change of Control Provisions