In this task, you will be presented with a context from an academic paper and you have to write an answerable question based on the context. Your questions can be extractive, abstractive, or yes-no questions.

Q: In our setup, our starting point is a base model, trained on NLI data. Rather than employing automated adversarial methods, here the model's "adversary" is a human annotator. Given a context (also often called a "premise" in NLI), and a desired target label, we ask the human writer to provide a hypothesis that fools the model into misclassifying the label. One can think of the writer as a "white hat" hacker, trying to identify vulnerabilities in the system. For each human-generated example that is misclassified, we also ask the writer to provide a reason why they believe it was misclassified.

A: Do they use active learning to create their dataset?
****
Q: Plackett-Luce Model for SMT Reranking
After being de-duplicated, the N-best list has an average size of around 300, and with 7491 features. This experiment displays, in large-scale features, the Plackett-Luce model correlates with BLEU score very well, and alleviates overfitting in some degree.

A: What experiments with large-scale features are performed?
****
Q: To further improve the performance, we adopt system combination on the decoding lattice level. By combining systems, we can take advantage of the strength of each model that is optimized for different domains. The best result for vlsp2018 of 4.85% WER is obtained by the combination weights 0.6:0.4 where 0.6 is given to the general language model and 0.4 is given to the conversation one. On the vlsp2019 set, the ratio is change slightly by 0.7:0.3 to deliver the best result of 15.09%.

A:
What is the language model combination technique used in the paper?
****