In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Comment: He "lowered the waistband of his pants while simultaneously elevating his genitals in a single suave, well-practiced motion."
Sexual-explicit

Comment: Luckily Trump will shut this idiot up once and for all.
Lord knows Junior can't.
Platitudes, climate change rhetoric along with a few epithets won't take out your enemy.
Maybe Junior could carbon tax kim juck muck to oblivion like he is doing to us.

Saturday Night Live needs an MC - kim juck muck would do fine
Non-sexual-explicit

Comment: I agree. It was the attitude passed on by the clergy, that sex was dirty and that if a girl got pregnant it was her own fault, even if she was raped. In some cases girls were impregnated by a family member or even their parish priest! But it was still her fault for seducing them! The stigma even extended to the innocent illegitimate child. A boy born out of wedlock was not allowed to receive holy orders!
Sexual-explicit