[QUESTION] Given the sentence "A man is kayaking in rough water." can we conclude that "A man is kayaking on rapids in a river."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Rapids in a river isn't the only place where rough water can be found.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

Q: Premise: "A yellow dog running through a grassy area carrying something small in its mouth."
Hypothesis: "A dog is playing fetch outside."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
A: A dog can carry something in its mouth without playing fetch.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

QUESTION: Premise: "A police officer standing next to a building looking toward the ground."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "An officer is near a building." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Let's solve it slowly: To be near a building is the same as being next to it.
The answer is yes.

[QUESTION] Premise: "Getting my new car clean and shiny."
Hypothesis: "A car gets cleaned up."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
You would have to get it clean and shiny for it to be cleaned up.
The answer is yes.

Q: Premise: "A street performer smiles at two potential customers."
Hypothesis: "The farmer looks at his cattle."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
A: A street performer smiles at two customers cannot be a farmer who looks at his cattle simultaneously.
The answer is no.

[QUESTION] Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "A man wears sunglasses and a hat."
Hypothesis: "Man sleeping on a beach."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
A man would not be wearing a hat and glasses if he is sleeping.
The answer is no.