We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control) into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[EX Q]: Sent1: The argument isn't that guns promote or cause crime, it is that when crimes happen having a gun involved causes more damage.
Sent2: Their argument is hardly valid, they want to stop the selling of firearms to people because they think it will decrease the crimes and school shootings along with other dangers that are caused by guns.
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: Which would be worthless because you could just repeal that amendment and then repeal the 2nd.
Sent2: If you repealed the 2nd amendment or any "incorporated" amendment than that amendment would no longer be law thus not "incorporated" (obviously since there is nothing to incorporate).
[EX A]: Similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: Gun ownership is a protected right, and the fact that criminals use guns in the commission of crime will never change this fact.
Sent2: This broader definition is used to cover general crimes committed with firearms (like possession by felons, armed career criminal violations, etc.)
[EX A]:
Not similar