In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.
Q: Comment: Another great RC hot issue to expend energy - to encourage discourse on dancing. As relevant as how many angels dance on the head of a pin!
The plight of 11 million immigrants here is under vicious assault by trump and sessions and where is NCR's coverage? You would think it isn't happening!
Many greenhouse issues as this find space to expound endlessly over trivial pursuits.
A huge majority of our immigrants have a Catholic identity, yet there is little passion to make their plight a priority in RC publications. Perhaps an occasional article when constant public pressure is needed to give their plight priority in public consciousness. Sidelining, ignoring it only deepens their suffering. Can we not imagine the anxiety individuals and families are going through now from a soulless administration (clogged with many Catholics) without any hope on the horizon? We're doomed as long as we dither with articles on dancing. No only is the issue irrelevant, increasingly Catholics are!
A:
Non-obscene