We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty) into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[Q]: Sent1: The lives saved by the death penalty, which I suspect is 0, unless the answer to the above question is "yes", is smaller than the innocents killed by the death penalty.
Sent2: All of the death penalty oppontents are for life in jail as opposed to the death penalty.I am sure that if some are found innocent,there are at least that many that are innocent and never set free.
[A]: Not similar

[Q]: Sent1: So should we be able to impose the sentence of life without parole, all the while understanding that we may have put an innocent man in prison for life?
Sent2: Given the scrutiny of death penalty cases, it seems that we would be more likely to lock someone up for life in prison and never uncover their innocence than we are to execute an innocent person.
[A]: Similar

[Q]: Sent1: There would be executions for murderers and jail time for others.
Sent2: IE - the death penalty acts as a deterrent to other would be murderers.
[A]:
Not similar