We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control) into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Q: Sent1: It is legal to own weapons in this country, they are just tightly controlled, and as a result we have far less gun crime (particularly where it's not related to organised crime).
Sent2: Prohibition led to an increase in organized crime, but that hasn't seemed to happen in nations that have banned guns.

A: Not similar
****
Q: Sent1: In March, officers began soliciting registered firearm owners across the city as part of what they call the Safe City Project.
Sent2: Where ALL guns are registered and they even sent police into each gun owner's home to make sure that they were secured properly.

A: Not similar
****
Q: Sent1: The theory is that reducing the overall number of handguns will somehow reduce gun crime, which is a little like saying that reducing the overall number of cars will reduce drunk driving.
Sent2: All one can reasonably conclude is that more firearms does not increase the homicide rate, nor does less guns reduce it.

A:
Not similar
****