Premise:
"An additional field work standard for attestation engagements performed in accordance with GAGAS "
Hypothesis: GAGAS is unrelated to field work standards for attestation engagements.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

no

input question: Since the 1991 cease-fire, U.N. inspectors have largely disarmed Saddam's nuclear, chemical, and biological arsenal, using random inspections and surveillance cameras to do their work. If this premise is true, does that tell us:"After 1991 Saddam's weapon systems were under inspection."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: yes

Question:
Based on the premise "To gain a better understanding of how tax incentives affect national saving, look at one how a tax deduction for a traditional tax-deferred IRA may affect government and ultimately national saving.", can we conclude that "Most people reading this have poor knowledge of taxes"? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
it is not possible to tell

Question: Sentence A: The Rembrandt Age Defying Adult Formula Toothpaste (don't ask about the Age Defying part).

Sentence B: Rembrandt created an age defying toothpaste that whitens their teeth.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question: Remember that, and forget the ties to any other world, since that world no longer holds you." Dave nodded slowly.
Recall all the other worlds you know, since they still hold you.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Problem: Here is a premise:
In contrast to Mallorca, Menorca's economy was devastated for decades.

Here is a hypothesis:
The Menorcan economy was incredibly wealthy and continued to boom for a long time.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer:
no