Q: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.
Comment: This article is a shining example of raw ignorance in how the system works. Joan admits she's biased, but attempts to minimize it by misdirecting the reader as to the reasons for her bias. Fact: the 60-vote threshold only becomes relevant if the minority party stages a filibuster. Breaking a filibuster, or "moving for cloture" in the parlance of the Senate, requires 60 votes. A vote to approve requires only 51. Neither of Obama's appointees faced a filibuster. Nor did President Bush's first nominee, John Roberts. Seven of the eight justices currently on the Court, prior to Gorsuch, did not face cloture votes, meaning they were not subject to the 60-vote threshold to which Democrats are insisting nominees are consistently held.
The only nominees to face filibusters along ideological lines were filibustered by Democrats. Gorsuch wasn't going to be filibustered for any other reason than that he was Trump's nominee.
What's weakening our Democracy is fanatical progressivism.
A:
Non-obscene