Problem: Here is a premise:
but i bet we've got at least seven more now that are bad

Here is a hypothesis:
Now we've got two more that are bad

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Sentence 1: Ninety percent of all tenants appearing in Housing Court - many facing eviction from their homes - do not have an attorney.

Sentence 2: Eighty percent of the tenants that appear in Housing Court have an attorney present.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: no

Question:
Who'd want to go back to the days when you couldn't even talk about condoms?

Does it follow that "Who finds open talk about condoms uncomfortable?"?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
yes

Q: If (Richard Holbrooke to Without those words of the president's that you passed to me, I would never have been able to get it done., can we say that "I would have easily gotten it done without the words that you passed to me."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A: no

Premise:
"APHIS rejected the second alternative because it believed that less stringent mitigating measures than the ones proposed would increase the risk of the introduction of hog cholera into the United States and that more stringent mitigating conditions would be unnecessarily restrictive."
Hypothesis: The risk of hog cholera in the United States would be increased if less stringent mitigating measures are implemented.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

yes

Sentence 1: In addition, after nearly 30 years of budget deficits, the combination of hard choices and remarkable economic growth has led to budget surpluses.

Sentence 2: The budget has had a deficit for decades.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer:
yes