Q: If Under the Save the Unified Surpluses simulation, federal budget surpluses would be higher over the next 40 years, but deficits would emerge in the 2040s., can we say that "Federal budget surpluses would be higher over the next 40 years."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A: yes

Premise:
"The major portion of the analysis discusses the alternatives considered and the reasons why required volume or performance standards for transplant programs and imposing specific allocation standards focusing on geographic equity were rejected in favor of the performance standards adopted."
Hypothesis: Geographic equity was shown to be a flawed method of setting performance standards.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

it is not possible to tell

input question: Sounds a little like Wright's Ferberizing experiences to me. If this premise is true, does that tell us:"It is nothing like Wright's Ferberizing. "?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: no

Question:
Based on the premise "It really doesn't matter what the chip is.", can we conclude that "It doesn't make a difference if the chip works or not."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
it is not possible to tell

Question: Sentence A: May God bless the brave men and women at CNN who will be working so hard and with such pleasure in the coming days.

Sentence B: There are no brave men and women at CNN.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question: Sentence A: He had to, said the Kal.

Sentence B: The Kal said that it was necessary for him to.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer:
yes