In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

[EX Q]: Comment: The Monty Python song is at most an exaggeration. That's probably why it's so funny.

No one is "proud" of masturbation. However, most people realize that it's not a big deal. Saying that it's sinful is at best silly, and at worst shows an unhealthy attitude about sexual activity.
[EX A]: Sexual-explicit

[EX Q]: Comment: Wait for it. Who knows what we'll see. Will Trump want to hug him? Hit him? Cuddle Him? Have you seen Trump's handshake with the Jap PM this morning? Trump looks even sillier than usual and has the Jap leader rolling his eyes because of an overlong and aggressive handshake. I can't stand Justin Trudeau, but I wish him well against this monumental creep on Monday. One a light-minded and handsome Canadian and the other a self-obsessed and literally "loud and obnoxious" American. The world is already watching Trump very closely and I think that Justin will stand out during and after his visit to D.C. - literally because of his good-looks. 21st century man.
I want to see how their handshakes go on Monday - that could tell it all.
[EX A]: Non-sexual-explicit

[EX Q]: Comment: Typical businessman spin. Downplay the loss; emphasis the gains. However, that doesn't work so well in politics especially when the gains are intangible like "enemy intel" which we'll get no quantitative value for compared to the clear cost of the death of an American serviceman. Well it doesn't work so well if your head isn't cluttered with campaign buzzwords and slogans...
[EX A]:
Non-sexual-explicit