Question: Sentence A: Lawyers at Seattle's Perkins Coie represented two Cold War-era defectors who claim the CIA didn't keep promises of financial support.

Sentence B: The CIA did not mean to break its promises.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question: and our local HEB stores here i don't know if it's HEB statewide or whatever but they have videos that uh i don't know if they still have them but they were free rental videos that had something to do with the war
The videos were very detailed, about three hours long.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Problem: Here is a premise:
Stories of the brothers' arrogance and brutality are legendary.

Here is a hypothesis:
The brothers were misunderstood

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Sentence 1: I did not quite know what to say.

Sentence 2: I wasn't sure how to respond.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: yes

Question:
procedures as identified by the Office of Management and Budget, the National Institute of Standards and Technology, Veterans Affairs' policies, and VBA guidance and policy documents.

Does it follow that "The Office of Management and Budget was one of the organizations that identified the procedures."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
yes

Question:
Based on the premise "We can stumble into a war with China over Taiwan very easily, warns Professor David Shambaugh of George Washington University.", can we conclude that "Shambaugh is concerned that we will accidentally get into an unintended war with China."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
it is not possible to tell