Premise:
"uh something that was a fundamental part of their philosophy of life"
Hypothesis: They were lost without their beliefs of life to guide them.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

it is not possible to tell

input question: In-depth, longitudinal reports of what has happened over time and why can set a context for interpreting a finding of implementation that is, whether there seem to be basic structural problems or if the program understandably requires time for installment, adaptations, and building an infrastructure. If this premise is true, does that tell us:"Most managers have observed that without these reports it takes a lot longer to find and uncover basic structural problems."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: it is not possible to tell

Question:
Based on the premise "Now, to my way of thinking, there is one insuperable objection to Miss Howard's being the murderess.", can we conclude that "A single objection keeps the woman from being labeled the killer."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
yes

Question: Sentence A: um-hum yeah and then when our dorm we whenever our bins are all filled up we take them and turn them in and then we get money for that

Sentence B: We don't get any benefits for recycling.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question: but well hey i appreciate the conversation
I'm glad we had this conversation.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Problem: Here is a premise:
He ate a solitary supper and went to sleep.

Here is a hypothesis:
He fell asleep because he was tired of facing the world alone.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer:
it is not possible to tell