Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.

[Q]: Im saying every swear word you can think of but cant say here that applies to Trump . The Dump is not welcome here and he needs to keep his fat azz away from Eugene. I will move to Canada if he somehow wins the election but I am holding out hope that he has pissed off the wrong person ( s ) and they will take care of his Hitlerness . This rotten filth will drag America down . Stop him now !!
[A]: Yes

[Q]: I have no idea what he said. My comment stems from carefully watching the video which pretty clearly shows the entire sequence of events. The motorcyclist shows zero evidence of being aware of the pursuit until the police car hit him from behind when the motorist came to a full stop at an intersection. At no time did the motorcyclist turn his head behind evidencing awareness of pursuit prior to being rear ended. But these are only my conclusions based on careful viewing of the dashcam video. Perhaps if you have a look you could see additional evidence that I missed.
[A]: Yes

[Q]: You do understand that you can't prove a negative right? People of faith are the ones making wild ass claims about magic sky wizards with no supporting evidence it is incumbent on them to provide proof of their claims not the other way around.
[A]:
No