Problem: Here is a premise:
What is more I will move sky and earth to have the world accept them.

Here is a hypothesis:
It's important to me that they are accepted by the world.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Sentence 1: Ah, but I am vexed with myself!

Sentence 2: I am disappointed in what I did.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question:
His Prime Minister, Count Camillo Cavour, a hard-nosed political realist, won over moderate left-wing support for a program of free-trade capitalism and large-scale public works construction.

Does it follow that "The prime minister didn't win over his rivals."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
no

Q: If These would be smaller planets, comparatively poorer in hydrogen and richer in oxygen., can we say that "The planets are comparatively better in hydrogen."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A: no

Premise:
"It's that even as a long-term thinker, he's thinking about the wrong things."
Hypothesis: If he thought about the right things, he could accomplish great feats.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

it is not possible to tell

Sentence 1: and when when we started uh having kids she had to work for a little while but then she just started substituting

Sentence 2: After our kids came my wife worked for a bit before starting subbing.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer:
yes