Heidi, I have reviewed the contracts and the amendments and the following is their status: 1. Contract Number 96006959 (012-41991-02-004) Amended April 1, 1999 Term: Month to Month and may be terminated by either party with 10 days written notice prior to end of the month (But see rate section below) Rate: Agreement was amended on April 1, 1999 to put a flat rate of $0.085 for all receipts at Thompsonville (Meter #6351) through March 31, 2006 (This language would override the month to month term) No other Points of Receipt are allowed under this contract. Note: Prior to the Amendment on April 1, 1999, the $0.01 fee escalator was still in effect for any volumes moved under this contract prior to the Amendment. If the escalator wasn't assessed during that time, it should have been. This escalator would have applied to all receipts and fees on the original Exhibit A to the contract. 2. Contract Number 96006966 (012-41991-02-003) Amended April 1, 1999 Term: In effect through March 31, 2006 Rate: Those set forth on Exhibit A as amended on April1, 1999 for the terms set forth on Exhibit A. Let me know if you have any questions concerning the above summary.
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: Entex Contract Review
Dear Mr. Lay, Recently I received notice that Enron will no longer provide electric service for my residence "as a result of continued uncertainty in this market, as well as a lack of clarity on the future of direct access." I find this very disappointing and would like Enron to re-consider this decision. I am a strong believer in the free market system and, in part, it was for this reason that I chose Enron as my electric service provider several years ago when the market in California was deregulated. I also chose Enron because of my knowledge of your company, its leadership and the strategic direction you have provided. Never was there a time in the marketing of electric service to the State of California for a company such as Enron to exhibit long range thinking & leadership. This is an opportunity for Enron to show commitment and staying power in a market that has "radically changed" and lacking in clarity. I recognize it is not an easy decision to change a decision that has already been made. However, I also consider you a risk taking, strong and capable leader who wants to make the right decision for its ultimate customers in spite of short term political decisions (that will get changed) by Governor Davis. Sincerely,
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: Leaving California Residential Market
How does Thursday the 18th sound to everybody? I think it works for everybody except Todd, who I didn't hear from, which may mean he's out of town. I'm flexible on time & place, but Giron's on the south side, Todd's by the Park shops (I think) and the rest are up north, so a central location would probably be best. Let me know what you think and I'll coordinate or just reply to all and we'll work it out amongst ourselves. Schroeder PS - Bear had a baby girl last Friday named Reagan. Mother and daughter are doing fine.
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: Lunch
Mr. Kenneth L. Lay, Chairman and CEO of Enron Corp. will not be able to attend the November 16 - 17, 2000 6th Olympiad of the Mind. If you have any questions, please call me. 713/853-5769 Thank you
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer:
6th Olympiad of the Mind