Read the given text and if it has abusive content then indicate via "yes". Otherwise indicate via"no".
We consider the content to be abusive if it contains any of the following instances: (1) Identity Directed Abuse (e.g., Content which contains a negative statement made against an identity. An identity is a social category that relates to a fundamental aspect of individuals community, socio-demographics, position or self-representation) (2) Affiliation Directed Abuse (e.g., Content which express negativity against an affiliation. We define affiliation as a (more or less) voluntary association with a collective. Affiliations include but are not limited to: memberships (e.g. Trade unions), party memberships (e.g. Republicans), political affiliations (e.g. Right-wing people) and occupations (e.g. Doctors).) (3) Person Directed Abuse (e.g., Content which directs negativity against an identifiable person, who is either part of the conversation thread or is named. Person-directed abuse includes serious character based attacks, such as accusing the person of lying, as well as aggression, insults and menacing language.) and (4) Counter Speech (e.g., Content which challenges, condemns or calls out the abusive language of others.). Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

Example Input: More like complex bitches, no simple bitch would have thought up such a grandios cacophony of nothingness.
Example Output: yes

Example Input: This should come as no surprise. These are the same people who literally argue in favor of the mayocide. Did you forget about that? I didn't. /r/Drama posters are literally pro-mayocide. That's not even me being hyperbolic or making insults, it's simply a fact. They. Are. Not. Human. They are autists. And they are completely irredeemable.[^(*Contact for info or issues*)](/message/compose?to=\/u/LightUmbra)
Example Output: yes

Example Input: 1 It's ok to refer to people exclusively using racial and sectarian insults and never call them their name 2 If 1 doesn't work, it's ok to physically push those people about. 3 Churches get totally vandalised 4 People get death threats 5 Local businesses are run by alleged terrorists 6 Said alleged terrorists invite convicted terrorists over and convicted terrorists are treated like celebrities we should be glad to have in our town 7 Young people get pushed and held down by adults who have given them death threats in the past 8 People are told to go home based on their heritage 9 One set of people always get the last word because if not then someone will end up beat up. You learn that quick. I knew that by the time I was 13 10 When young men like my best friend come out as gay at 18 they are made to leave town and disowned by their own families. He is an amazing guy but his family won't see that. He is a talented guy that most towns would brag about, but not ours. 11 It's ok to label young people as thieves based on their heritage 12 It's ok to pick on young people when you're in a gang of mates and they're on their own. I'm probably missing things out here. I'm basing this only on things I've directly seen or my own experiences. So if we're going to start gossiping, let's start with this stuff. And let's get this stuff sorted so people stop thinking it's ok. I left town last weekend scared in case people saw me as weak. But I don't care if they do or not. I'm strong for enduring some of this stuff. (I hope this isn't blanket statements, I'm not naming the town to keep it anonymous, safety reasons, and also to avoid stereotyping the place.)
Example Output:
no