Question:
Based on the premise "so you don't have to fool with any of that anymore", can we conclude that "You won't have to mess with that anymore but you really should."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
no

Question: Sentence A: She bought out Wladeczek's farm, when he went back to cabbage and rapeseed,' Jareczek from Czyszniow said, washing down a bite of dried sea horse with a gulp of mhiskey.

Sentence B: Jareczek was eating cabbage and rapeseed.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question: well that makes it more my parents have the same kind of deal too
The deal is more cost effective, I think.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Problem: Here is a premise:
It's not really surprising that when it finally did, its foes realized they could take a mile.

Here is a hypothesis:
The foes did not realize anything after they did it.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Sentence 1: Opponents of affirmative action often observe that it doesn't exist in performance-based arenas like show business.

Sentence 2: Affirmative action always works.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: no

Premise:
"I had to format both drives."
Hypothesis: There was only one to format.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
no