Categorize the comment on the basis of severe toxicity. If the comment is severely toxic output Yes, otherwise output No.

Example Input: How on earth has a sixth-rate hack like Tyler Hurst been allowed to spew his half-assed, ad hoc bullshit on a once-respected news/lifestyle forum like WW for this long? Is he paid for this shit??
So you like smoking weed, Tyler Hurst?? GREAT! Want to defend that position with false equivalencies and paper-thin logical fallacies (cannabis is "legal" therefore it should be LEGAL!!!)? Fuck you! Like pretty much everywhere else, in Portland you can't blaze a joint in a public spaces, bars, restaurants, malls, cider houses, Forever 21, or wherever the fuck you spend your free time. Having second thoughts about LOBU 26 or whatever your shitty apartment complex is called because smoking weed violates your rental contract? Renegotiate that shit, or move somewhere else! After all, we're all free to live wherever we want, right??
Should there be a cannabis club scene in Portland? Absolutely. Focus on the defensible, dipshit, and leave this city ASAP.
Example Output: Yes

Example Input: Clearly the Murkowskis understand nothing about the environment. I've been to these islands, that took tens of thousands of years to evolve their unique biological populations. The cattle are ruining them in short order. People screwed up the ecology of these islands and people need to restore them to their original, natural condition. These are just stupid cows, for God's sake. Just because they can live there doesn't mean they should live there. Their hooves are cutting in and turning precious tundra into mud. And they are destroying rare, valuable indigenous species of native plants and animals. Kill them all and let them rot.
Example Output: Yes

Example Input: wrong, the debt came from obumma. fact
Example Output:
No