Ashley woke up bright and early on Friday morning during summer. Her birthday was only a day away, and her parents had promised her a trip to the fair as her present the next day! She thought it was going to be quite a treat. She skipped down the stairs to see her mom making a chocolate cake on the stove. "You run along outside to go play with your friends," her mom told her, "I can get everything ready for your special lunch on my own." When Ashley made it outside, she found her friend Katherine playing in the dirt. When Ashley came closer, she saw that in the dirt were a bunch of insects. Katherine loved finding and collecting different ones for her insect collection. Ashley thought it was kind of gross personally, but she sat down next her anyways. "Happy birthday, Ashley," Katherine yelled when she saw her best friend. "Thank you," Ashley answered, "Do you want to go up to the playground until it's time for lunchtime? Mom says you're invited to come by the way." Katherine nodded, and the two spent a fun morning playing on the playground. Once lunchtime came, the two walked back to Ashley's house. She could picture how many of her favorite foods her mom had most likely made, and she could almost taste the spaghetti on her tongue. Lunch was ready when they arrived, and it was delicious! The chocolate cake her mom made was an extra special treat. She couldn't wait to go to the fair tomorrow! What are the answers to this following set of questions: 1. When did Ashley wake up?
2. On what day?
3. During what season?
4. What was happening soon?
5. Where was she going?
6. with who?
7. Were her parents going with her?
8. What was her mom doing?
9. What kind?
10. for what?
Answer: 1. early
2. Friday
3. summer
4. her birthday
5. the fair
6. unknown
7. yes
8. baking a cake
9. a chocolate cake
10. her special lunch

Attorney General Eric Holder is not entirely ruling out a scenario under which a drone strike would be ordered against Americans on U.S. soil, but says it has never been done previously and he could only see it being considered in an extraordinary circumstance.

He began to winnow the list of those possible extraordinary circumstances Wednesday. In testimony Wednesday before the Senate Judiciary Committee, Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, pressed Holder whether he believed it would be constitutional to target an American terror suspect "sitting at a cafe" if the suspect didn't pose an imminent threat.

"No," Holder replied.

But he also said the government has no intention of carrying out drone strikes inside the United States. Echoing what he said in a letter to U.S. Sen. Rand Paul, R-Kentucky, he called the possibility of domestic drone strikes "entirely hypothetical."

That letter, released Tuesday, was prompted by questions raised over the nomination of John Brennan to head the CIA. Specifically, members of the Senate Intelligence Committee sought the Obama administration's legal rationale for its use of drones to kill terror suspects overseas.

But Sen. Rand Paul, a Kentucky Republican who has said he would do what he could to hold up Brennan's nomination until he got a full answer to his query, wanted to know whether the administration considered that policy applicable domestically.

Holder: Drone strike against Americans in the U.S. possible

In a letter to Paul dated on Monday, Holder said it was possible, "I suppose," to imagine an "extraordinary circumstance in which it would be necessary and appropriate" under U.S. law for the president to authorize the military to "use lethal force" within the United States. What are the answers to this following set of questions: 1. Who was testifying?
2. Who is he?
3. What was he testifying about?
4. What type of strikes are being discusseds
5. Who would they be against?
6. Who questioned him?
7. What's his job?
8. and his political party?
9. Who questioned the man testifying?
10. what's his job
11. where's he from
Answer: 1. Eric Holder
2. Attorney General
3. Drone strikes
4. against Americans
5. Americans on U.S. soil
6. the Senate Judiciary Committee
7. Attorney General
8. Republican
9. Sen. Ted Cruz
10. Senator
11. Texas

(CNN) -- Around the world, media reaction to the Democrats' victory has poured in, as newspapers and broadcasters reflect on the Barack Obama campaign and the global impact his win will have.

A woman picks up a copy of a newspaper in Sydney, Australia

The International Herald Tribune said that America had "leaped" across the color line, calling Obama "a 47-year-old black man who made history both because of his race and in spite of it."

The Times of London said Obama had revitalized U.S. politics. "The immense turnout in yesterday's election was testament to the energy, excitement and expectations of a rejuvenated American democracy, as well as the fears of a nation standing at a crossroads of history," the paper said.

It added that Obama's inheritance would be challenging. "The new president faces economic and social convulsions at home, conflict abroad."

Also in London, The Guardian focused on the historic nature of the Democrats' win, saying: "Victory in the end came as easily as the polls had predicted," and comparing Obama's achievement with Roosevelt's of 1932 and Reagan's of 1980.

In Germany, Der Spiegel's Gregor Peter Schmitz, writing from Chicago, called Obama's rise "astonishing," adding that his "curious ability to remain untouched by all the razzmatazz around him is likely to prove a source of strength."

Al Jazeera said Obama had "surfed to power on a wave of voter discontent generated by the failures of President George Bush and the Republican Party" and added that he faces "unique challenges." It continued that he must "act quickly" to restore confidence in the economy and with his country "sick of war" is "unlikely to make any additional major overseas military commitments." What are the answers to this following set of questions: 1. The world is reacting to what event?
2. What did the International Herald Tribune say America had done?
3. What did they say Obama had made?
4. Why?
5. What did The Times say he had done for U.S. politics?
6. How did they characterize the election turnout?
7. What did they say it was a testimonial to?
8. And what else?
9. Did they think Obama's inheritance would be easy?
10. What do they believe he has to face in the U.S.?
11. And internationally?
12. What did The Guardian emphasize?
13. Did they call it a hard-won triumph?
14. What prior victorious Democrat did they compare Obama's win to?
15. And which Republican's?
16. What year did the first of those triumphs take place?
17. And the latter one?
18. How did Der Spiegel describe Obama's ascension?
19. What did Al Jazeera describe as the cause of his success?
20. Caused by what?
Answer:
1. The Democrats' victory.
2. "Leaped" across the color line.
3. History.
4. Both because of his race and in spite of it.
5. Revitalized them.
6. Immense.
7. The energy, excitement and expectations of a rejuvenated American democracy.
8. The fears of a nation standing at a crossroads of history.
9. No.
10. Economic and social convulsions.
11. Conflict.
12. The historic nature of the Democrats' win.
13. No.
14. Roosevelt's.
15. Reagan's.
16. 1932.
17. 1980.
18. Astonishing.
19. A wave of voter discontent.
20. The failures of President George Bush and the Republican Party.