IN: Dear Sir's Aknowledge receipt of voyage order no. 002-01. Brgds Oe. Hansen Master E-mail: master.gall@hoegh.no Teleph: Inmarsat tel.no. 330853910 Fax : Inmarsat fax no. 330853913 Telex : Inmarsat B telex no.330853915 Telex : Inmarsat C telex no.430853910 (24hrs.watch)

Generate a subject line.

OUT: VOY. ORDER 002-01
IN: This is an email
I wanted to let everyone know that the meeting between Southwest Gas and SoCal concerning presence of PCBs on the Southwest Gas system will be this tuesday. I had an opportunity to speak with Ralph Komai today during the PCB quarterly management conference call that Transwestern has with SoCal to discuss PCB related invoices. As a brief summary, Southwest has had isolated hits of PCB in liquids (232 and 132 ppm) and in wipe tests (10-100 ug/wipe) in regulators on their system and they have asked Ralph if he would assist them in the management and disposal of PCBs on their system. He wil also be providing thoughts on how and why PCBs move in a gas pipeline. I had asked Ralph not to mention about Transwestern's agreement with SoCal for which Transwestern pays SoCal for 86% of their PCB costs. I had asked him to only focus on the Southwest system. Apparently Southwest is not up to speed with the PCB regualtions, however, enough so that they do realize that the mega rule will impact their operations and Ralph will probably provide input for that as well from an LDC standpoint. I asked Ralph whether Southwest seemed excited or worried about the PCB discovery on their system and he indicated that they were more concerned about compliance with the PCB regulations. Ralph said he will let me know the results of the meeting.

What is the subject?

OUT: SoCal Meeting with Southwest Gas
QUESTION: Cathy Van Way called asking my view on some names she'd been given to invite to the hearing. (I continue to cajole Jessie Knight to appear.) During the call, she mentioned that the committee intends to invite Steve Kean and that she needed someone to email here Steve's vitals so that they could write a letter inviting him.
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: Congressional Hearing in S.D. on the 11th
My friends, It is with some regret that I must tell you that I am leaving EBS & Enron as of Aug. 15th. I have learned a lot during my long tenure at EBS. Admittedly, some of what I've learned is how not to start a business; but I've also learned numerous positives around teamwork, management, setting goals, and defining new product markets. All in all, I have definitely come out of the experience enriched. What I regret the most is having to leave all of you. I believe very strongly in the role of good people in achieving greatness. And I have worked with some very brilliant, creative people while at EBS. All of you have, in one way or another, enriched my life and work. I really appreciate that. If I had a single wish before I left, I would like for Enron to better understand that to achieve greatness as a company, it is not sufficient to "will" it to occur. At a minimum, it requires the right people, with the right skills, and the right knowledge, in the right area, and at the right time. The key emphasis here is people. People can't guarantee success; but they are a necessary prerequisite. I will continue to be available till the 15th to transition any projects, knowledge, or whatever people need. And after the 15th, I will be around from time-to-time on a consulting basis with various Enron groups. My current plan is to stay in the Houston area for the foreseeable future, primarily consulting and working with various organizations to support entrepreneurship in the area. Please feel free to contact me at any time to talk on any topic. I'll leave you with one of my favorite quotes: "We cannot direct the wind, but we can adjust the sails" Thank you.
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: Closing Remarks
Jose, I think the supplemental info you have provided is outstanding and helpful to the lenders in understanding the overall picture and the history. However, its focus is not the central concern of the lenders at this point as I understand it. The lenders and their counsel are concerned specifically about third party liability meaning, I believe, lawsuits or claims from parties who did not receive power because Cuiaba failed to generate. Therefore, I think the questions which Tozzinni needs to address are along the lines of: 1) If EPE is required to sign the agreements by ANEEl, What is the extent of damages that could be claimed in the context of such agreements? 2) Could any consequential damages be assessed? 3) Could EPE excuse itself from the legal proceedings on the basis of the bid documents, the PPA or other agreements with Furnas, Electronote or Eletrabras? 4) How would the economic equilibrium process work in the case of a judgement which was payable by EPE? Could the process be expedited to avert a liquidity crisis? 5) Could EPE be denied access to the grid as a result of failure to cover a spot market price assessed by the MAE stemming from an unscheduled outage? 6) Similarly, could EPE incur penalties or be denied transmission if they failed to contribute in accordance with the shared liability provisions of the agreements? 7) Will we need to sign the agreements for other reasons (such as access to back-up power) which would be excluded from the protections by Furnas under the PPA? 9) Could Furnas deny or delay reimbursement if the amount is not recoverable by them or while they are awaiting word on a claims recoverability? 10) A question for insurance - Does our Business Interuption insurance protect us in any of these instances? (Note: the US$20MM Sponsor liquidity facility provides some comfort to the lenders) John, stop me if you think I am off track. If you have other questions which you think need to be addressed please continue ....
Answer: Interconnection Agreements
Q: A meeting was held with the third party attorney who is providing assistance with the recently issued NOV for the P-1 C/S over a like for like turbine exchange which occurred in 1996. A history was given of the incidents which led up to the NOV being issued and results of the meeting which Transwestern had with the AQB in 1996 which lead Transwestern to believe that issue had been resolved. The calendar year 2000 PCB annual document logs were prepared and submitted to each generator of PCBs on the Transwestern system. Training was given to the Midland Region over the correct completion and submittal of forms used to report natural gas releases to the TNRCC. The agency has updated and has become more stringent with respect to Regional requirements for the reportable releases which are submitted to them. An incomplete form submittal by a compressor station facility near MIdland led to this emergency training being given. Based upon a phone call with Region 7 of the TNRCC, the agency stated that they will be issuing NOV's to facilities that submit incomplete "Upset/Maintenance NOtification Forms for Reportable Events".
Propose a subject line
A:
Weekly Activity Report Roswell Area