Dear Alumni, My name is Nicholas Jamroz, and I am pledging good ol' Mass Delta of SAE. While getting a sig with the current treasurer Matt Barrett, he assigned me to a mission. In order to complete this sig, I need to find out which former treasurer left a particular item on the wall as he was leaving office. I chose a stuffed bear. It looks pretty mangled, with stuffing busting out at the seams, and a torn-off nose. It is brownish-gray in color. Any help you could give me as to who left this or any story behind the bear, please e-mail me back at njamroz@wpi.edu . Thank you for your help and keep the SAE tradition alive. Nick Jamroz
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: SAE Pledge Mission
Hi Jeanine - I have checked with Jeff Skilling's office and he is not available on June 26. May we go back to the drawing board? We can offer some time in the afternoon of August 7, 8 or 9 - possibly 2:00 p.m. on one of those days. Those dates are currently good for Ken Lay, Jeff Skilling and Dave Delainey. Please advise at your earliest convenience. Rosalee
Answer: Meeting with Kimberly-Clark/Enron
Here is an email: I still can't talk. I think that our response should be final except that there may be some agreed to changes on the L/C side. Carol St. Clair is addressing that with Jennifer and Miriam. In any event, I believe that Tiger needs to "OK" our response of yesterday since there were some errors on their redraft. Marie is not in the office today. If you want to speak to a person, call Susan Bailey and she can come into my office and we can manage. Have a good weekend. Sara
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: Tiger
Q: On Thursday afternoon, I received from NRG all of the transcripts of communications that they recorded between the parties. Here is my short summary: There are six transcripts. Five of them seem pretty good for us. One is truly awful. Transcript 1 (May 4, 2001): NRG's Bill Stone talks to John Zurita about trying to come to terms on the deal. No terms are finalized. Transcript 2 (May 4, 2001): Stone calls Zurita back and proposes a price that Zurita agrees to. However, Zurita makes it clear that although many of the terms have been agreed to, "obviously we have to get agreements signed and get the lawyers involved and all that good stuff." Stone appears to recognize that the deal is not complete: "So we're really not done. Fuck." Transcript 3 (May 8, 2001): Stone simply leave a voicemail for Chuck Decker asking to get a confirm of the deal. Transcript 4 (May 8, 2001): Stone talks to Decker. Decker says: "Rogers Herndon is in charge of that. Okay? He has to put the pressure on the credit guys to get the credit shit put to bed. His words, and they're not exact, but they're pretty close to this, I consider the deal done, tell Bill the deal is done, assuming that the back offices communicate the needed information." Discussions are had about getting the credit folks together to iron out details. Transcript 5 (May 16, 2001) (THE BAD TAPE): Stone calls Zurita and sets him up, asking him a number of questions aimed at determining if there really is a binding and enforceable deal between the parties. When Stone asks "why don't you just tell me where you guys think the deal is?," Zurita replies: "I think -- I say the deal is done." Stone's next question: "Well, let me ask a question. What happens if gas goes to two bucks tomorrow? Do you still consider the deal done?" Zurita's answer: "Yep." And there's more. Stone next asks: "Are you guys going to stand on the deal for $70 for the five years? I mean, I just -- I mean, I just gotta know exactly where you stand." Zurita's answer: "The deal is done, yes." Ouch. This is not good.
Propose a subject line
A: NRG Dispute
IN: David- If I want to communicate with the other commission members, am I supposed to funnel it through you? If so, I want to find out if anyone is interested in setting up a table at the carnival (April 21) to solicit public opinion on P&Z issues. We could set up next to the tree committtee or share a table. I'll be at the carnival until about 3 pm; however, I'll be working from 12-2. Also, we could solicit public opinion outside the clubhouse on election day, May 5. I could do that anytime before 4 pm. Anyone else interested??? Thanks,

Generate a subject line.

OUT: P&Z
IN: This is an email
I would like to consider some counterparty-specific agreement to solve this problem. What do you think of a side agreement among both KN entities and Enron which specifies that a user ID and password have been issued to both of KN's legal entities jointly and severally and that transactions for certain products (e.g. all financial products) entered into under that user ID and password will be deemed executed by KN Trading (their financial trading entity) and all others will be deemed executed by KN Marketing (their physical entity)? Do you see any problems here? Issues re: joint & several liability under the ETA but not the Transactions? Let me know if you need further clarification of the problem. I haven't run this by Louise yet - she may raise system or commercial objections. Mark

What is the subject?

OUT:
Assignment Issue