In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Comment: My original post to which you responded, was in the context of revolution. Did you miss that?
It seems to me that you're filling in some blanks with fantasy. I have no intention of starting a civil war, a revolution, of invading anyone's home, or killing someone because his or her political points of view differ from mine. In the light of recent events, it seems that it's more likely progressives who kill their ideological adversaries.
However, should there be a civil war between progressives and conservatives, I'd be supporting the conservatives in all ways of which I'm capable. I sincerely hope it never comes to that.
To be really clear, I do consider progressivism to be a social/political cancer that if allowed to grow will eventually kill the host.
Non-sexual-explicit

Comment: Victor, Thanks for this 'column'! Of course there is only one problem with this report. It is too short. There is so much more 'going on out there'.
But nothing going on in Hawaii other than the "Grapes of Wrath" responses we hear about on the news.
As Edmund Burke said, "When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall one by one, an unpitied sacrifice in a contemptible struggle." [In Hawai'i's case, the bad men are those whose covetousness blinds them to the unfairness of zoning and the need for regulating the housing market.
Non-sexual-explicit

Comment: But that Freud died in 1939. "Hoplophobia" was coined in 1962. Besides, Freud attributed most everything to something appertaining to sex or the penis.
Sexual-explicit