[QUESTION] Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "A large group of people rafting."
Hypothesis: "A large group of people are rafting on a river."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
It may be impossible to tell if the body of water in the image is a river.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

Q: Can we conclude from "Two men on scooters pass each other on the road and make conversation." that "The two men went to school together."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
A: There's no way of knowing that the men went to school together.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

QUESTION: If "Four people in a dimmly lit room with pictures all over the walls and two bright lights are engaging in conversations." does that mean that "A group of people fighting over a football."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Let's solve it slowly: Ones cannot be engaging in conversations and fighting over a football simultaneously.
The answer is no.

[QUESTION] Premise: "A child rides a bicycle in front of a large red brick mansion."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A kid rides a bike in front of his house." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Kid is a synonym for child. Bike is the short term for bicycle. A mansion is technically a house.
The answer is yes.

Q: Can we conclude from "A young boy drives a power wheels motorcycle with an american flag attached to the back." that "A young boy rides a toy motorcycle."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
A: Power Wheels motorcycle is a motorcycle. One who rides a motorcycle also drives a motorcycle.
The answer is yes.

[QUESTION] Premise: "A man working on a grand piano."
Hypothesis: "The pianist is working on his piano."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
We can't imply that the pianist is a man working on a piano.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.