Question:
Based on the premise "Yet your name was on the monument, and we drew you back by its use.", can we conclude that "We got you back because of the monument."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
yes

Question: Sentence A: Having endlessly debated the staying power of his '60s comic-strip sendups, most critics now conclude his art will last.

Sentence B: After endless debates critics decided that the 1960s work of Little Abner will last last forever.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question: For historians not to reach out smacks of elitism, he says.
They are not seen as elitists.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Problem: Here is a premise:
Transforming the Civil Building the Workforce of the Future, Results of a GAO-Sponsored Symposium (GAO/GGD-96-35, Dec. 26, 1995).

Here is a hypothesis:
GAO-Sponsodred Symposium results.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Sentence 1: Legend says that a great fire burned for seven years on the island, leveling it of all its trees.

Sentence 2: A myth claims that every tree on the island was destroyed by a seven-year fire.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: yes

Premise:
"But the problem of economic and social inequality remains, and violence, which accompanies political allegiance, remains a part of everyday life in the ghettos of Kingston."
Hypothesis: There is no connection between political allegiance and violence in Kingston.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
no