input: Make use of the article to answer the questions. CHAPTER LXXIX

The Wharton Wedding

It was at last settled that the Wharton marriage should take place during the second week in June. There were various reasons for the postponement. In the first place Mary Wharton, after a few preliminary inquiries, found herself forced to declare that Messrs. Muddocks and Cramble could not send her forth equipped as she ought to be equipped for such a husband in so short a time. "Perhaps they do it quicker in London," she said to Everett with a soft regret, remembering the metropolitan glories of her sister's wedding. And then Arthur Fletcher could be present during the Whitsuntide holidays; and the presence of Arthur Fletcher was essential. And it was not only his presence at the altar that was needed;--Parliament was not so exacting but that he might have given that;--but it was considered by the united families to be highly desirable that he should on this occasion remain some days in the country. Emily had promised to attend the wedding, and would of course be at Wharton for at least a week. As soon as Everett had succeeded in wresting a promise from his sister, the tidings were conveyed to Fletcher. It was a great step gained. When in London she was her own mistress; but surrounded as she would be down in Herefordshire by Fletchers and Whartons, she must be stubborn indeed if she should still refuse to be taken back into the flock, and be made once more happy by marrying the man whom she confessed that she loved with her whole heart. The letter to Arthur Fletcher containing the news was from his brother John, and was written in a very business-like fashion. "We have put off Mary's marriage a few days, so that you and she should be down here together. If you mean to go on with it, now is your time." Arthur, in answer to this, merely said he would spend the Whitsuntide holidays at Longbarns. 1. What month is the wedding to occur?
2. Is it during the third week?
3. Is it happening on schedule?
4. Why not?
5. Who would be able to come now?
6. Who got married before her?
7. What was her name?
8. There was a note penned to whom?
9. Was it casually worded?
10. What was his response?
numbered_answers: 1. June
2. No.
3. No
4. Various reasons.
5. Arthur Fletcher.
6. Her sister.
7. Emily.
8. John.
9. Yes.
10. He would spend the Whitsuntide holidays at Longbarns

input: Make use of the article to answer the questions. Chapter 3: In A French Chateau.

The three days' ride to the chateau of the Countess de Laville was marked by no incident. To Philip it was an exceedingly pleasant one. Everything was new to him; the architecture of the churches and villages, the dress of the people, their modes of agriculture, all differing widely from those to which he was accustomed. In some villages the Catholics predominated, and here the passage of the little party was regarded with frowning brows and muttered threats; by the Huguenots they were saluted respectfully, and if they halted, many questions were asked their followers as to news about the intentions of the court, the last rumours as to the attitude of Conde, and the prospects of a continuance of peace.

Here, too, great respect was paid to Marie and Philip when it was known they were relatives of the Countess de Laville, and belonged to the family of the De Moulins. Emilie had for some time been a widow--the count, her husband, having fallen at the battle of Dreux, at the end of the year 1562--but being an active and capable woman, she had taken into her hands the entire management of the estates, and was one of the most influential among the Huguenot nobles of that part of the country.

From their last halting place, Marie Vaillant sent on a letter by one of the men to her sister, announcing their coming. She had written on her landing at La Rochelle, and they had been met on their way by a messenger from the countess, expressing her delight that her sister had at last carried out her promise to visit her, and saying that Francois was looking eagerly for the coming of his cousin. 1. Where are they going?
2. Whose?
3. Who is traveling?
4. Who else?
5. How do the Catholics feel about them?
6. Did they say anything to them?
7. Did the Huguenots like them?
8. How could they tell?
9. What was something they asked about?
10. Did they want to know about anything else?
11. Are they related to the Countess?
12. How?
13. Was the Countess married?
14. When did her husband die?
15. How?
16. Did she have children?
17. How did she know they were coming?
18. How>
19. Who the Countesses sister?
20. Who does Francois want to see?
numbered_answers: 1. chateau
2. Countess de Laville
3. Philip
4. Marie
5. They didn't like them.
6. Yes, if they halted.
7. Yes
8. they were saluted respectfully
9. news about the intentions of the court
10. the last rumours as to the attitude of Conde
11. Yes
12. belonged to the family of the De Moulins
13. She was widowed.
14. 1562
15. fallen at the battle of Dreux
16. No
17. Marie Vaillant sent on a letter
18. by one of the men
19. Marie Vaillant
20. his cousin

input: Make use of the article to answer the questions. (CNN) -- Organizers of the 2018 Russia World Cup insist they have nothing to hide ahead of an investigation into the bidding process for the 2018 and 2022 tournaments.

Football's world governing body FIFA awarded the 2018 competition to Russia and the 2022 World Cup to Qatar in December 2010, a decision which has been dogged by allegations of corruption and wrongdoing.

Michael Garcia, a former New York attorney, is head of the investigative arm of FIFA's ethics committee and will visit all of the countries involved in the bidding process for the two tournaments, beginning in London next week. Garcia has always insisted he is completely independent from FIFA and would not hesitate to take action against president Sepp Blatter or other top FIFA officials if he found evidence that they broke the rules.

The head of media for Russia 2018 says the committee will co-operate fully with Garcia's fact-finding investigation.

"We can confirm the local organizing committee (LOC) will fully support Mr Garcia's work if he contacts us," read a statement issued to CNN.

"The Russia 2018 committee ran a bid campaign in full compliance with FIFA rules and ethics, and we were awarded the right to host the FIFA World Cup because of the unique and compelling proposition we put together.

"The LOC continues to conduct itself with exactly the same degree of transparency, commitment to excellence and spirit of fair play."

Blog: Can the Qatar World Cup be moved?

How and where Garcia's potential meeting with Russia takes place is open to question given in April he was one of 18 people barred from entering the country over what Moscow said were human rights abuses, linked to the lawyer's arrest and charging of Viktor Bout, a Russian, who is serving a 25-year prison sentence in the U.S. for arms trafficking. 1. What media outlet published this story?
2. Who claims they have nothing to hide?
3. what process is being investigated?
4. for which tournaments?
numbered_answers:
1. CNN
2. Organizers of the 2018 Russia World Cup
3. The bidding process
4. the 2018 and 2022 tournaments