In this task, you will be shown a prompt from a judicial decision and multiple holding statements derived from citations following text in a legal decision. Holdings represent the governing legal rule when the law is applied to a particular set of facts. There are five answer choices for each citing text. The correct answer is the holding statement that corresponds to the citing text. You should write an incorrect option. Even though there exist multiple wrong answers, we only need a single wrong answer. There is a <HOLDING> token in the position of the citing text prompt where the holding statement was extracted.

see also Gov't Brief at 30. There is no reason to believe that national defense or national security will be adversely affected, since Waste Management Washington will continue to provide solid waste collection and disposal services at Fairchild AFB until a new solicitation is issued and contract is awarded. See TR 5. 2. Bid And Proposal Expenses And Attorney's Fees And Costs Blue Dot also has requested payment for bid and proposal expenses, including costs and attorney's fees associated with this protest. See Pl. Compl. 5, 6 at 8. The Tucker Act states that the court may award monetary relief in post-award bid protests for "bid preparation and proposal costs." 28 U.S.C. 1491(b)(2); see also 28 U.S.C. 1920; E.W. Bliss Co. v. United States, 77 F.3d 445, 447 (Fed.Cir.1996) (<HOLDING>). Therefore, Blue Dot may file an appropriate
Holding statements: (A) holding that city had implied contract with bidder to treat bidder fairly (B) holding that tucker act jurisdiction is founded on an implied contract to have the involved bids fairly considered (C) holding that a denial of a bid protest without holding a hearing did not deprive a disappointed bidder of any property rights because there is no legitimate claim of entitlement to a government contract unless the contract actually is awarded (D) holding that tucker act jurisdiction is founded on an implied contract to have the involved bids fairly and honestly considered (E) holding that unsuccessful bidder is awarded its bid preparation costs because the government violated its implied contract to have the involved bids fairly and honestly considered
holding that city had implied contract with bidder to treat bidder fairly