In this task, you're given a paragraph and title from the research paper. Your task is to classify whether the given title is suitable or not for the research paper based on the given paragraph. Return "True" if title is proper according to paragraph else "False".
--------
Question: Paragraph: Feline coronavirus (FCoV) is common among cats living indoors in groups. In about 10% of infected cats, a potentially lethal disease, feline infectious peritonitis (FIP) occurs. Virus transmission is faecal-oral. Mutian®️ Xraphconn (Mutian X) is a product marketed to treat cats with FIP but is also being used to stop virus shedding, although no clear guidelines exist for its use for this purpose. The aim of this study was to establish the minimum dose and treatment duration required to ensure viral clearance from the faeces of asymptomatic virus-shedding cats. In five multicat households, 29 cats naturally infected with FCoV and actively shedding virus in the faeces were given Mutian X pills. Virus shedding was monitored using reverse-transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) controlled for faecal inhibitors to ensure sensitivity. Mutian X given orally cleared the virus in 29 cats; although four cats required a repeated course to finally stop virus shedding. A dose of 4 mg/kg q24 h for four days was found to be the optimal treatment protocol: 2 mg/kg cleared only 80% of cats. Posttreatment using a sensitive RT-qPCR test was essential to ensure that virus clearance had been achieved, since failure to clear even one cat can result in re-infection of the others. Records of virus shedding by cats before treatment provided a retrospective control: significantly more cats stopped shedding virus after Mutian X than recovered from infection during the control period (p < .00001). This is the first report of the successful elimination of faecal FCoV shedding in chronically infected cats.
Title: Oral Mutian®️X stopped faecal feline coronavirus shedding by naturally infected cats

Answer: True

Question: Paragraph: Viral pathogens often generate strong CD4 + T cell responses that are best known for their ability to help B cell and CD8 + T cell responses. However, recent studies reveal additional roles for CD4 + T cells, some of which are independent of other lymphocytes, and indicate that memory cells are more effective in most functions than naive CD4 T cells. Here, we review the full spectrum of antiviral functions of CD4 + T cells, including their helper activities, innate immune induction, and direct anti-viral roles, and suggest how these functions are integrated to provide highly protective responses against viral pathogens.
Title: Expanding roles for CD4 + T cells in immunity to viruses NIH Public Access

Answer: False

Question: Paragraph: Background: Phi29 polymerase based amplification methods provides amplified DNA with minimal changes in sequence and relative abundance for many biomedical applications. RNA virus detection using microarrays, however, can present a challenge because phi29 DNA polymerase cannot amplify RNA nor small cDNA fragments (<2000 bases) obtained by reverse transcription of certain viral RNA genomes. Therefore, ligation of cDNA fragments is necessary prior phi29 polymerase based amplification. We adapted the QuantiTect Whole Transcriptome Kit (Qiagen) to our purposes and designated the method as Whole Transcriptome Amplification (WTA). Results: WTA successfully amplified cDNA from a panel of RNA viruses representing the diversity of ribovirus genome sizes. We amplified a range of genome copy numbers from 15 to 4 10 7 using WTA, which yielded quantities of amplified DNA as high as 1.2 g/l or 10 10 target copies. The amplification factor varied between 10 9 and 10 6 . We also demonstrated that co-amplification occurred when viral RNA was mixed with bacterial DNA. Conclusion: This is the first report in the scientific literature showing that a modified WGA (WTA) approach can be successfully applied to viral genomic RNA of all sizes. Amplifying viral RNA by WTA provides considerably better sensitivity and accuracy of detection compared to random RT-PCR.
Title: BMC Molecular Biology Phi29 polymerase based random amplification of viral RNA as an alternative to random RT-PCR

Answer:
False