You will be given a definition of a task first, then an example. Follow the example to solve a new instance of the task.
In this task, you must classify if a given review is positive/negative, indicating your answer as P or N.

plot : two teen couples go to a church party , drink and then drive .
they get into an accident .
one of the guys dies , but his girlfriend continues to see him in her life , and has nightmares .
what 's the deal ?
watch the movie and " sorta " find out . . .
critique : a mind - fuck movie for the teen generation that touches on a very cool idea , but presents it in a very bad package .
which is what makes this review an even harder one to write , since i generally applaud films which attempt to break the mold , mess with your head and such ( lost highway & memento ) , but there are good and bad ways of making all types of films , and these folks just did n't snag this one correctly
.
they seem to have taken this pretty neat concept , but executed it terribly .
so what are the problems with the movie ?
well , its main problem is that it 's simply too jumbled
.
it starts off " normal " but then downshifts into this " fantasy " world in which you , as an audience member ,
have no idea what 's going on
.
there are dreams , there are characters coming back from the dead , there are others who look like the dead , there are strange apparitions , there are disappearances , there are a looooot of chase scenes , there are tons of weird things that happen , and most of it is simply not explained .
now i personally do n't mind trying to unravel a film every now and then , but when all it does is give me the same clue over and over again , i get kind of fed up after a while , which is this film 's biggest problem .
it 's obviously got this big secret to hide , but it seems to want to hide it completely until its final five minutes .
and do they make things entertaining , thrilling or even engaging , in the meantime ?
not really .
the sad part is that the arrow and i both dig on flicks like this , so we actually figured most of it out by the half - way point , so all of the strangeness after that did start to make a little bit of sense , but it still did n't the make the film all that more entertaining .
i guess the bottom line with movies like this is that you should always make sure that the audience is " into it " even before they are given the secret password to enter your world of understanding .
i mean , showing melissa sagemiller running away from visions for about 20 minutes throughout the movie is just plain lazy ! !
okay , we get it .
. .
there are people chasing her and we do n't know who they are .
do we really need to see it over and over again ?
how about giving us different scenes offering further insight into all of the strangeness going down in the movie ?
apparently , the studio took this film away from its director and chopped it up themselves , and it shows .
there might 've been a pretty decent teen mind - fuck movie in here somewhere , but i guess " the suits " decided that turning it into a music video with little edge , would make more sense .
the actors are pretty good for the most part , although wes bentley just seemed to be playing the exact same character that he did in american beauty , only in a new neighborhood .
but my biggest kudos go out to sagemiller , who holds her own throughout the entire film , and actually has you feeling her character 's unraveling .
overall , the film does n't stick
because it does n't entertain , it 's confusing , it rarely excites and
it feels pretty redundant for most of its runtime , despite a pretty cool ending and explanation to all of the craziness that came before it .
oh ,
and by the way , this is not a horror or teen slasher flick . . .
it 's just packaged to look that way because someone is apparently assuming that the genre is still hot with the kids .
it also wrapped production two years ago and has been sitting on the shelves ever since .
whatever . .
. skip it !
where 's joblo coming from ?
a nightmare of elm street 3 ( 7/10 ) - blair witch 2 ( 7/10 ) - the crow ( 9/10 ) - the crow : salvation ( 4/10 )
- lost highway ( 10/10 ) - memento ( 10/10 ) - the others ( 9/10 ) - stir of echoes ( 8/10 )
Solution: N
Why? The phrases used in the review convey a negative sentiment (e.g. "presents it in a very bad package").

New input: synopsis : as a response to accusations of sexual prejudice in the armed forces
, a female naval intelligence officer is chosen to be a test case .
if she can survive the demanding s.
e.
a. l. training
, she will open the way for other women to be permitted to follow in her footsteps .
throw in a lot of political machinations , sabotage , brutality , water and sand
and you have an entertaining movie .
review :
the title of this movie turned me off at first .
i mean ' gi jane ? ' ? ? ? ? ?
the other titles which were considered were more promising - in pursuit of honor or a matter of honor would have been acceptable although navy cross or undisclosed are a little meaningless as far as i 'm concerned .
i went into this movie not liking the title and being one of those people who thinks that demi moore is absolutely ghastly as an actor .
to my surprise i really enjoyed the movie .
moore as lieutenant jordan o'neil is much more likeable than her washed out excuse for a gusty woman in a few good men .
the storyline is simple .
anne bancroft playing senator lillian dehaven is a ruthless , machiavellian politician with an agenda to push . using feminism to achieve political mileage
, she forces the military powers that be to backdown and permit a test case to enter the highly intensive navy
s.
e.
a. l. training .
jordan is selected due to the fact that she has it all - looks , brains and strength .
the training is gruelling and the indignity almost painful to watch .
nonetheless
, it 's one of those movies that makes me want to cheer out and encourage the hapless hero / heroine along in his / her endeavours .
sure , there are the stereotypical elements - inhuman treatment , sexual innuendo , resentful peers , pained boyfriend and sexist commanding officer . stepping away from the stereotypes though , viggo mortensen as master chief john urgayle tries to get away from being nothing more than a brutal screamer .
his character exercises a little more intellectual rigour than you would normally expect from such a character .
jordan 's boyfriend royce is also in the military .
although they both started at the same time , due to the fact that he has seen active service , he has advanced through the ranks much more quickly than she has .
royce ( what is his surname ?
do we care ? )
almost resents jordan 's attempts to advance herself , although he quickly settles down to being doe - eyed and supportive .
his character seems to have been thrown in so that we know that you do n't have to be a lesbian to want to be in the military .
in parts , this is a very silly movie , with gratuitous lines and scenes thrown in for effect which are so blatantly obvious or contrived that it 's hard not to cringe .
i still liked it though .
weaknesses in the script aside
, this is a film which captures a heroic and reckless mood .
as we watch jordan 's battle , it 's increasingly clear that it is a personal battle .
this is an individual 's fight for self - advancement .
we do n't have to have our teeth set on edge by didactic preachings , we do n't have to feel uncomfortable because we 're having ideology thrust down our throats .
it 's enough that we can sit back and hope that this one person gets what she wants and we can admire her tenacity and determination without coming out and saying whether we believe women should go into combat or not .
Solution:
P