Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
--------
Question: And how does corporate welfare we are all paying for, in a global economy suit your careful sensibility? The narrow focus of one aspect of manipulation of so much that is interconnected, shows how you could move elsewhere, yet still manage to complain about indigenous land ownership in perpetuity.

They had all that before the European industrial revolution allowed them to steal with impunity. And treaty upon treaty was supposed to allow them to recover from that loss; yet the indigenous peoples were repeatedly put into a smaller holding cell & given less rations than previously.

You are on stolen property & yet would seek to stand 'your' ground there? ;)

Answer: No

Question: _"Buh Bye Hillary"_ -- "4:20" the anonymous poster

Buh Bye "4:20"!

And, good riddance.

-- Paul

Answer: No

Question: I would imagine a responsible person would get another job or even two even if it were washing dishes to take care of his own. A non-productive person would rather take a government handout, that's why our state and national budgets or so badly in debt, plus our education spending is quite ridicules. That's my humble opinion and that's where I would start cutting. Mr. Civility :)

Answer:
Yes