Problem: Here is a premise:
I figure he made three or four false promises to me during our preliminary conversations as he tried to figure out how to play this to his advantage.

Here is a hypothesis:
He is not a trustworthy person.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Sentence 1: Note to Mark If you say it on NewsHour don't repeat yourself on Capital Gang .

Sentence 2: Remember Mark, don't repeat yourself on Capital Gang if you say it on NewsHour.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: yes

Question:
well then let's let's answer the second half of the question what limits ought to be put on it do you think

Does it follow that "Let's move on to the second part of the question dealing with limits that should be in place."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
yes

Q: If uh and it was great Steven the only thing that Steven didn't like that's my son was uh you know they had those dancing bears and stuff it scared him to death, can we say that "My son Steven loved dancing with the bears there."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A: no

Premise:
"Kamakura history was not shaped by the Minamoto clan alone."
Hypothesis: Three other clans in Kamakura played a part in shaping its history.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

it is not possible to tell

Sentence 1: Could the strychnine have been administered in Mrs. Inglethorp's after-dinner coffee which was taken to her by her husband?

Sentence 2: Mrs. Inglethorp's husband never took her after-dinner coffee.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer:
no