In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence can be inferred from the statement. Incorrect choices change the meaning in important ways or have details that are not mentioned in the statement. Indicate your answer as 1,2, or 3 corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

[EX Q]: Statement: This requires careful organization of the files of original observations, complete documentation of the conditions of data collection that are relevant to the trustworthiness and credibility of the information, and making transparent and reproducible the manner in which the evaluator moved from phase to phase of the analysis. Choices: 1. Several cases of fraud have been discovered where the evaluator's procedure was not well-documented. 2. It is not necessary to document the evaluator's process. 3. Thorough documentation is necessary so that the evaluator's process can be reproduced.
[EX A]: 3

[EX Q]: Statement: Finally, he managed something that was adequate, if the brilliant floral sportshirt could be said to go with levi pants and a morning frock. Choices: 1. At last, he put on something that was adequate. 2. He did not care to put on any clothes at all. 3. His attire was mismatched, but he did not care.
[EX A]: 1

[EX Q]: Statement: Yes, yes, too conclusive, continued Poirot, almost to himself. Choices: 1. Poirot ignored the conclusiveness of the outcome. 2. Poirot is quite a dismissive individual. 3. Poirot is very agreeable with his thinking.
[EX A]:
1