In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: Are you kidding me. Trans gender bathroom bill, westboro, god hates fags, attempting to pint gays as pedophiles, painting gays as the cause of the aids epidemic, and constantly judging everyone through a very negative lens has been the religious rights mode of attack.

Then you dare come on here and again attack people that call out intolerance. It is not intolerance to point out hate, and your side peddles in hate of everything they didn't like.

Your side has spent years shouting down and name calling anyone that doesn't agree, then you come here and blame the other side. Par for the course, I guess.

Party of Personal Responsibility or is it Party of Her Emails now?

Output: Identity-attack

Input: Consider Input: Comment: Gee, I've seen lists of 25-30 things..just for starters, starting with making fun of a disabled reporter, saying most Mexicans are rapists and drug dealers. How are these consistent with Christian values? THEY ARE NOT 😡😡😡😡😡

Output: Identity-attack

Input: Consider Input: Comment: Once again the far right will support a sexual abused and claim moral superiority but want gay people in jail. Remember when Obama played golf once in a while? The right had a cow. What's the difference? Hmmmmmmm. Right wingers show their bigotry every day. Go ahead right wingers commenters prove me wrong. And don't bring up Hillary.
Output: Identity-attack