We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty) into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Input: Consider Input: Sent1: I have been a victim of rape and if I were a victim of murder I would not desire the death penalty for the perpetrator.
Sent2: I think that if the murderer wants the death penalty, they should be allowed it if the victim's family agrees- but for crimes of passion and misunderstanding, no death penalty.

Output: Not similar

Input: Consider Input: Sent1: The majority populations of all countries may support the death penalty for some crimes (1).
Sent2: Over 40 countries have abolished the death penalty for all crimes since 1990.

Output: Similar

Input: Consider Input: Sent1: So, seems to me that when you make death a quick (as in timely) and certain punishment, there is most definitely a deterent effect.
Sent2: The dealth penalty is not as simple as it seems.
Output: Not similar