Question:
And the dilemma Loury identified so clearly 22 years ago remains not only unresolved but also unconfronted.

Does it follow that "The dilemma was identified, confronted, and resolved over twenty years ago."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
no

Q: If yeah that'd be sort of neat yeah well i like the idea of uh being uh a mandatory thing for welfare course that's what um that's sort of like what Truman had or or was it Roosevelt i can't remember um with the big, can we say that "I think everyone applying for welfare should have to provide that proof."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A: it is not possible to tell

Premise:
"But I made a grave error, just a bad mistake on my part."
Hypothesis: I made no mistakes at all, and all my calculations were correct.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

no

input question: The Supreme Court has held that the First Amendment also protects independent expenditures . Individuals and organizations can spend as much as they want on a candidate's behalf as long as they don't coordinate their spending with the candidate. If this premise is true, does that tell us:"The First Amendment says everyone should donate as much as they'd like."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: it is not possible to tell

Question:
Based on the premise "On Ensuring the Availability of Evaluation Data for Secondary Analysis.", can we conclude that "Definitely not ensuring the Availability of Evaluation Data for Secondary Analysis."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
no

input question: Accompanying the discussion of each practice is a case illustration involving a federal agency that has made progress in incorporating the practice into its operations. If this premise is true, does that tell us:"Each discussion is accompanied by a case illustration. "?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer:
yes