In this task, you will be presented with a context from an academic paper and you have to write an answerable question based on the context. Your questions can be extractive, abstractive, or yes-no questions.

[Q]: Table TABREF24 shows that while the acceleration of trading decoder layers for encoding layers in training is small, in decoding is significant. Specifically, the Transformer with 10 encoder layers and 2 decoder layers is $2.32$ times as fast as the 6-layer Transformer while achieving a slightly higher BLEU.
[A]: How much is decoding speed increased by increasing encoder and decreasing decoder depth?

[Q]: Results in Table TABREF13 show ten probes. Again, we see the performance of baseline ELMo-transformer and mSynC are similar, with mSynC doing slightly worse on 7 out of 9 tasks. As we would expect, on the probe for predicting chunk tags, mSynC achieves 96.9 $F_1$ vs. 92.2 $F_1$ for ELMo-transformer, indicating that mSynC is indeed encoding shallow syntax. Overall, the results further confirm that explicit shallow syntax does not offer any benefits over ELMo-transformer.
[A]: What are improvements for these two approaches relative to ELMo-only baselines?

[Q]: holistic: The baseline model which maps the holistic image feature and LSTM-encoded question feature to a common space and perform element-wise multiplication between them.

TraAtt: The traditional attention model, implementation of WTL model BIBREF9 using the same $3 imes 3$ regions in SalAtt model.

RegAtt: The region attention model which employs our novel attention method, same as the SalAtt model but without region pre-selection.

ConAtt: The convolutional region pre-selection attention model which replaces the BiLSTM in SalAtt model with a weight-sharing linear mapping, implemented by a convolutional layer.

Besides, we also compare our SalAtt model with the popular baseline models i.e. iBOWIMG BIBREF4 , VQA BIBREF1 , and the state-of-the-art attention-based models i.e. WTL BIBREF9 , NMN BIBREF21 , SAN BIBREF14 , AMA BIBREF33 , FDA BIBREF34 , D-NMN BIBREF35 , DMN+ BIBREF8 on two tasks of COCO-VQA.
[A]:
To which previous papers does this work compare its results?