[QUESTION] Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "People strolling casually across a bridge."
Hypothesis: "People jumping off the bridge."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
People strolling across the bridge and not jumping off the bridge.
The answer is no.

Q: Premise: "A small kid climbs down a wall with ropes tied to him from top."
Hypothesis: "The kid can climb."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A: The kid can climb because the kid climbs down a wall.
The answer is yes.

QUESTION: If "Two people and two horses watching a fire." does that mean that "The horses are stuck in the burning building."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Let's solve it slowly: Watching a fire is not the same as being stuck in a fire. People are not horses.
The answer is no.

[QUESTION] Premise: "A group of people sitting on top of a hillside."
Hypothesis: "There are people on a hill."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
A hill side is usually by the side of a hill.
The answer is yes.

Q: Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "A young boy is either jumping on a trampoline or skateboarding and he is serious about it on a beautiful summer day."
Hypothesis: "A boy wearing shorts and a green t shirt is jumping on a trampoline or skateboarding."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
A: It was not mentioned that the boy was wearing shorts and a green t shirt.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

[QUESTION] Premise: "A man sitting in a boat fixing his fishing nets by hand."
Hypothesis: "A man works on his fishing equipment while on a boat."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
A man fixing his nets means he works on his fishing equipment.
The answer is yes.