In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence can be inferred from the statement. Incorrect choices change the meaning in important ways or have details that are not mentioned in the statement. Indicate your answer as 1,2, or 3 corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

Ex Input:
Statement: And isn't that the reason to come here? Choices: 1. There are no reasons to come here. 2. That's the reason to come here. 3. There are some reasons to come here.

Ex Output:
2

Ex Input:
Statement: and i don't think it's that different from what the Baltic States are are going through Choices: 1. It is in no way like what the Baltic States are experiencing. 2. It's similar to what the Baltic States are going through. 3. The Baltic States are having problems with Russia.

Ex Output:
2

Ex Input:
Statement: Chosen People is an extension of his Biblical evidence that Jews are Neanderthals includes the Esau incident (Esau is hairy, remember?) Choices: 1. Chosen people has not extened his Biblical evidence. 2. Chosen People brings up thirty new pieces of biblical evidence. 3. Chosen People is an extension of his Biblical evidence.

Ex Output:
3