In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: insult and non-insult. Insult is any lanugage or act that is disrespectful or scornfully abusive.
--------
Question: Comment: Gore won the popular vote. It came down to Florida and Gore was in the process of conceding when the closeness of the Florida vote triggered an AUTOMATIC recount. That recount, with its problems, made a court review necessary, not optional.
Try being coherent: we're talking about Trump screaming, before a ballot is cast, that the election is rigged, that he cannot commit to conceding after the ballots are counted. Context is all. You probably don't even know that Pence has said he would abide by the voter's will. Or that many, many Republicans already are condemning Trump's words.
I suppose you're fine with Trump sniggering on Howard Sterns's show as the great lecher described Trump's daughter as a hot "piece of ass." What father wouldn't punch that guy in the face? Trump is a very sick man. At this juncture, to support him is the act of a morally confused person.

Answer: Insult

Question: Comment: Ross is a bully, just like his boss.

He is engaging in a war of words in the hopes of convincing Canada and Mexico to give in quickly when negotiations start. Unfortunately for him he has tipped his hand. He does not just want a quick deal, he NEEDS a quick deal.

The best thing we can do now is not agree to his timetable. No deal by the end of the year.

I personally do not see how we could get to a deal by the end of the year anyway. The terms Ross will offer us will likely be so oppressive that no Canadian politician could accept them without losing their seat and their party's standing in the next election. The same goes for Mexico.

Negotiations will be protracted unless Ross caves, something he seems disinclined to do. I am not in favor of giving him the semblence of a deal as a face saving jesture. The guy is jerk.

We had better get ready for a post NAFTA world, just in case.

Answer: Insult

Question: Comment: B. Carfree, in the case you cite, there is not much preventive that can be done unless you have the resources with which to electronically scan your environment, or, at the lease, suspect photographic monitoring is happening and do some snooping of your own. Otherwise, preventive steps can be taken as I've described in my letter.
There may be instances wherein the subject has agreed to nude and sexually explicit photography so as to have a record for posterity. In that case and in the instances included in my letter, the subject may need to be apprised of the risks inherent in such endeavors. Then he or she can make an informed decision as to whether or not a photographic record of nudity and sexual activity should be created.

Answer:
Non-insult