Question:
Based on the premise "This performance contains one other oddity worth noting.", can we conclude that "There is nothing odd or noteworthy about this performance. "? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
no

Question: Sentence A: It is also, needless to say, free of any taint of bias or corruption.

Sentence B: It reeks of bias, and appears to be nothing but corruption, costumed and paraded as something better than it actually is.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question: Then, under cover of darkness, Drake sent out attack boats to destroy the Spanish frigates.
Drake took his brigade south to avoid an altercation with the Spanish.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Problem: Here is a premise:
Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press, 1991.

Here is a hypothesis:
The Brookings Institution Press had offices in Washington in 1991.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Sentence 1: Reconstructing the key requires the cooperation of each holder.

Sentence 2: You just need one holder to make the same key.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: no

Premise:
"yes we uh uh i haven't missed a one since i've been eligible to vote"
Hypothesis: I haven't done this since becoming eligible to vote.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
no