In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence can be inferred from the statement. Incorrect choices change the meaning in important ways or have details that are not mentioned in the statement. Indicate your answer as 1,2, or 3 corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

Input: Consider Input: Statement: A good case study reports methodological strengths and limitations for answering the evaluation questions and explains the tradeoffs that were considered and who influenced the decisions. Choices: 1. Limitations of the methodology used should not be discussed in the case study report. 2. Decision influencers can have a negative impact on the study's credibility. 3. Tradeoffs can be made during a case study, and should be disclosed.

Output: 3

Input: Consider Input: Statement: In one of them, a congressional hearing on the minimum wage becomes an attack ad as Rep. Choices: 1. The congressional hearing on minimum wage was a peaceful event. 2. There was a congressional hearing about the minimum wage. 3. There was much disagreement at the hearing.

Output: 2

Input: Consider Input: Statement: Tucked away in a small fold of the hills is Chashma Shahi, the smallest but in many ways most exquisite of the Mughal Gardens, drawing its water from a spring that runs directly down the adjacent mountainside. Choices: 1. Chashma Shahi is the largest of the Mughal Gardens, but there's not much of interest to see there. 2. Chashma Shahi is one of the Mughal Gardens and gets its water from a mountain spring. 3. Chashma Shahi is widely considered to be the most beautiful of the Mughal Gardens.
Output: 2