TASK DEFINITION: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.
PROBLEM: Comment: Are you kidding me. Trans gender bathroom bill, westboro, god hates fags, attempting to pint gays as pedophiles, painting gays as the cause of the aids epidemic, and constantly judging everyone through a very negative lens has been the religious rights mode of attack.

Then you dare come on here and again attack people that call out intolerance. It is not intolerance to point out hate, and your side peddles in hate of everything they didn't like.

Your side has spent years shouting down and name calling anyone that doesn't agree, then you come here and blame the other side. Par for the course, I guess.

Party of Personal Responsibility or is it Party of Her Emails now?

SOLUTION: Identity-attack

PROBLEM: Comment: A witch hunt, nothing more nothing less. Did she give any thought to the 3,000 who died in New York and what success has the ICC had to date with the untold $millions which have been spent by this elitist "old boys' club". Pray tell why the Sudanese President is still at large and Mugabe travels freely throughout the world? Ermine robed, latte sipping parasites - that is the ICC.

SOLUTION: Non-identity-attack

PROBLEM: Comment: Thanks for proving once again the facts and circumstance are a foreign concept to you.
If you actually looked at the facts you would notice that the civilian casualties were actually the result of the US protecting the vast majority of Muslim civilians from other Muslim facists and terrorists.

SOLUTION:
Identity-attack