Teacher: In this task, you are given text for US Congressional and California state bills, your task is to generate a summary for this bill.
Teacher: Now, understand the problem? If you are still confused, see the following example:
SECTION 1. LIABILITY OF BUSINESS ENTITIES PROVIDING USE OF FACILITIES
TO NONPROFIT ORGANIZATIONS.

(a) Definitions.--In this section:
(1) Business entity.--The term ''business entity'' means a
firm, corporation, association, partnership, consortium, joint
venture, or other form of enterprise.
(2) Facility.--The term ''facility'' means any real
property, including any building, improvement, or appurtenance.
(3) Gross negligence.--The term ''gross negligence'' means
voluntary and conscious conduct by a person with knowledge (at
the time of the conduct) that the conduct is likely to be
harmful to the health or well-being of another person.
(4) Intentional misconduct.--The term ''intentional
misconduct'' means conduct by a person with knowledge (at the
time of the conduct) that the conduct is harmful to the health
or well-being of another person.
(5) Nonprofit organization.--The term ''nonprofit
organization'' means--
(A) any organization described in section 501(c)(3)
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and exempt from
tax under section 501(a) of such Code; or
(B) any not-for-profit organization organized and
conducted for public benefit and operated primarily for
charitable, civic, educational, religious, welfare, or
health purposes.
(6) State.--The term ''State'' means each of the several
States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto
Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, the Northern
Mariana Islands, any other territory or possession of the
United States, or any political subdivision of any such State,
territory, or possession.
(b) Limitation on Liability.--
(1) In general.--Subject to subsection (c), a business
entity shall not be subject to civil liability relating to any
injury or death occurring at a facility of the business entity
in connection with a use of such facility by a nonprofit
organization if--
(A) the use occurs outside of the scope of business
of the business entity;
(B) such injury or death occurs during a period
that such facility is used by the nonprofit
organization; and
(C) the business entity authorized the use of such
facility by the nonprofit organization.
(2) Application.--This subsection shall apply--
(A) with respect to civil liability under Federal
and State law; and
(B) regardless of whether a nonprofit organization
pays for the use of a facility.
(c) Exception for Liability.--Subsection (b) shall not apply to an
injury or death that results from an act or omission of a business
entity that constitutes gross negligence or intentional misconduct,
including any misconduct that--
(1) constitutes a crime of violence (as that term is
defined in section 16 of title 18, United States Code) or act
of international terrorism (as that term is defined in section
2331 of title 18) for which the defendant has been convicted in
any court;
(2) constitutes a hate crime (as that term is used in the
Hate Crime Statistics Act (28 U.S.C. 534 note));
(3) involves a sexual offense, as defined by applicable
State law, for which the defendant has been convicted in any
court; or
(4) involves misconduct for which the defendant has been
found to have violated a Federal or State civil rights law.
(d) Superseding Provision.--
(1) In general.--Subject to paragraph (2) and subsection
(e), this Act preempts the laws of any State to the extent that
such laws are inconsistent with this Act, except that this Act
shall not preempt any State law that provides additional
protection from liability for a business entity for an injury
or death with respect to which conditions under subparagraphs
(A) through (C) of subsection (b)(1) apply.
(2) Limitation.--Nothing in this Act shall be construed to
supersede any Federal or State health or safety law.
(e) Election of State Regarding Nonapplicability.--This Act shall
not apply to any civil action in a State court against a business
entity in which all parties are citizens of the State if such State
enacts a statute--
(1) citing the authority of this subsection;
(2) declaring the election of such State that this Act
shall not apply to such civil action in the State; and
(3) containing no other provision.
Solution: Shields a business entity from civil liability relating to any injury or death occurring at a facility of that entity in connection with a use of such facility by a nonprofit organization if: (1) the use occurs outside the scope of business of the business entity; (2) such injury or death occurs during a period that such facility is used by such organization; and (3) the business entity authorized the use of such facility by the organization.
Makes this Act inapplicable to an injury or death that results from an act or omission of a business entity that constitutes gross negligence or intentional misconduct, including misconduct that: (1) constitutes a hate crime or a crime of violence or act of international terrorism for which the defendant has been convicted in any court; or (2) involves a sexual offense for which the defendant has been convicted in any court or misconduct for which the defendant has been found to have violated a Federal or State civil rights law.
Preempts State laws to the extent that such laws are inconsistent with this Act, except State law that provides additional protection from liability. Specifies that this Act shall not be construed to supersede any Federal or State health or safety law.
Makes this Act inapplicable to any civil action in a State court against a business entity in which all parties are citizens of the State if such State, citing this Act's authority and containing no other provision, enacts a statute declaring the State's election that this Act shall not apply to such action in the State.
Reason: This Bill focuses on shielding business entities from civil liability relating to an injury or death depending on the conditions of injury, hence the generated summary is correct.

Now, solve this instance: SECTION 1. FINDINGS.

Congress finds the following:
(1) The United States has been involved militarily, and
with nation building and reconstruction, in the Islamic
Republic of Afghanistan since 2001.
(2) The United States military engagement in Afghanistan
began in 2001 under a congressional authorization for the use
of military force against ''those nations, organizations, or
persons [the President] determines planned, authorized,
committed, or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on
September 11, 2001.''.
(3) On October 2, 2011, United States Navy Seals killed
Osama Bin Laden, the head of Al-Qaeda, the terrorist
organization responsible for the September 11, 2001, attacks on
the United States.
(4) Since 2001, the United States military and its
coalition partners have killed or captured tens of thousands of
Al Qaeda, Taliban, and other insurgents in Afghanistan.
(5) In 2014, the United States announced the end of 13
years of combat operations in Afghanistan.
(6) The war in Afghanistan is the longest war in American
history.
(7) According to the Department of Defense, since 2001,
2,216 United States service members have been killed in
Afghanistan, and over 20,049 service members have been wounded.
(8) Since 2001, 150 coalition personnel, including United
States service members, have been killed by the Afghan security
forces personnel that American taxpayers are paying to train.
Another 189 service members have been wounded.
(9) Over the past 15 years, nearly $800 billion of United
States taxpayers' money has been spent on Afghanistan.
(10) The Special Inspector General for Afghanistan
Reconstruction (SIGAR), John Sopko, has documented billions of
dollars of waste, fraud, and abuse of American taxpayers hard-
earned money in Afghanistan, which continues to this day. For
example:
(A) According to a 2016 USA Today article entitled
''Report cites wasted Pentagon money in Afghanistan'',
among the more egregious examples of boondoggles Sopko
cited included ''importing rare blond Italian goats to
boost the cashmere industry''. The $6 million program
included shipping nine male goats to western
Afghanistan from Italy, setting up a farm, lab, and
staff to certify their wool.
(B) An ongoing SIGAR investigation found that
American taxpayers are paying as many as 200,000
fictitious Afghan ''ghost'' soldiers, potentially
costing hundreds of millions of dollars annually.
(11) On May 1, 2012, Afghan President Hamid Karzai and
United States President Barack Obama signed the ''Enduring
Strategic Partnership Agreement between the Islamic Republic of
Afghanistan and the United States of America'', which committed
the United States to supporting the social and economic
development, and security, of Afghanistan for at least 10
years. The agreement was submitted to the Afghan Parliament,
which approved it. However, the agreement was never submitted
to, voted on, or approved by the Congress of the United States.
(12) The United States continues to maintain a military
presence of 8,400 troops in Afghanistan, and continues to
annually spend roughly $43 billion of American taxpayers' money
there. That money funds, among other things, America's 15-year-
long effort to train and equip Afghan military and police
forces, as well as a variety of reconstruction and foreign aid
programs.
(13) General Charles Krulak, 31st Commandant of the United
States Marine Corps, has stated, ''Attempting to find a true
military and political answer to the problems in Afghanistan
would take decades, not years, and drain our nation of precious
resources . . . with the most precious being our sons and
daughters. Simply put, the U.S. cannot solve the Afghan problem
. . . no matter how brave and determined our troops are.''.
(14) In a January 2017 article in the Wall Street Journal,
Hamid Karzai, former President of the Islamic Republic of
Afghanistan from 2004 to 2014, stated, ''The fact is that the
U.S. presence in Afghanistan has not brought security to us. It
has caused more extremism.''.
(15) There has never been a full debate in Congress on
whether to continue the United States engagement in
Afghanistan.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR ACTIVITIES IN
AFGHANISTAN.

(a) In General.--No funds may be made available for activities in
Afghanistan after the date that is one year after the date of the
enactment of this Act.
(b) Exceptions.--The prohibition in subsection (a) shall not apply
with respect to--
(1) operations of the United States Embassy in Afghanistan;
or
(2) intelligence gathering activities.
(c) Waiver.--The prohibition in subsection (a) may be waived on a
case-by-case basis if--
(1) the President submits to Congress a certification that
the availability of funds for the activities described in
subsection (a) is in the national interests of the United
States; and
(2) Congress, within 30 days after receipt of a
certification under paragraph (1), enacts a joint resolution
authorizing the availability of funds for the activities
described in subsection (a).
(d) Expedited Procedures.--A joint resolution described in
subsection (c)(2) and introduced within the appropriate 30-day period
shall be considered in the Senate and House of Representatives in
accordance with paragraphs (3) through (7) of section 8066(c) of the
Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 1985 (as contained in Public
Law 98-473; 98 Stat. 1935), except that in applying and administering
such paragraphs--
(1) references in such paragraphs to the Committees on
Appropriations of the House of Representatives and the Senate
shall be deemed to be references to the Committee on Foreign
Affairs of the House of Representatives and the Committee on
Foreign Relations of the Senate, respectively; and
(2) paragraph (5)(B) of such section 8066(c) shall be
applied and administered by substituting ''not less than eight
hours but not more than ten hours'' for ''not more than ten
hours''.
Student:
This bill prohibits making funds available for activities in Afghanistan after one year following enactment of this bill. Such prohibition shall not apply to: (1) operations of the U.S. Embassy in Afghanistan, or (2) intelligence gathering activities. Such prohibition may be waived on a case-by-case basis if: (1) the President submits to Congress a certification that the availability of funds for such activities is in U.S. national interests; and (2) Congress, within 30 days after receipt of such certification, enacts a joint resolution authorizing the availability of funds for such activities.