Generate an explanation for the given claim using the provided supporting material from the paragraph. Please consider the following points while generating an output. 1) The claim will always have supporting proof in the paragraph, and the paragraph will have a clear point of view supporting the claim. 2) There can be instances where direct correlation to the claim is not available. Make use of the sentences in the paragraph to provide a corresponding output supporting the claim. 3) The explanation should be at least one and at most twelve sentences long.

Example Input: Paragraph: The extraordinary safety measures that will govern the May 20-22 session were delineated in a letter Wednesday from Democratic House Speaker Michael Madigan to the House minority leader. Legislators will have to pledge to follow Illinois Department of Public Health guidelines to prevent the spread of the highly contagious and potentially lethal coronavirus. They include pre-session testing of all legislators for COVID-19. Eschewing the traditional Capitol setting, the House will be called to order six blocks away at the Bank of Springfield Center in downtown Springfield, to take advantage of the spacious convention center floor for social distancing. The Senate, whose membership is half the House's 118 seats, will meet in its regular chamber, Senate President Don Harmon said in a statement. The Oak Park Democrat rallied senators to return to action with the "cooperative spirit of bipartisan achievement" they've shown before. "This global pandemic has decimated our state and local economies regardless of political affiliation," Harmon said. "From far-flung living rooms, kitchen tables and home offices, senators have been working together while apart to figure out what we can and need to do now." Legislators, whom Gov. J.B. Pritzker declared essential workers and not subject to his seven-week-old stay-at-home order scheduled to expire May 30, have nonetheless been absent from the Statehouse since early March to prevent spreading sickness. That period represents the heart of the Illinois General Assembly's spring-session calendar, ending with a scheduled May 31 adjournment and typically a budget for the fiscal year that begins July 1. Pritzker implored lawmakers to help those left out of initial federal relief deals. "Lots of people fell through the cracks," Pritzker said at his daily COVID-19 briefing in Chicago. Relief won't come from the state treasury. Tax revenue lost because of the pandemic has opened a $7 billion deficit in the current budget and next year's. Illinois will be dependent on the federal government, Pritzker said. "We need to rely upon federal government and its support for all the states in order for us to provide the services that people need or for us to pay for the education that our kids need, and for us to support our businesses and our families," Pritzker said. Madigan's letter to House GOP Leader Jim Durkin of Western Springs said all state representatives must pledge to abide by public health guidelines for safely congregating. In addition to pre-trip testing, they include agreeing to undergo body temperature checks upon entering the building for sessions, wearing provided face coverings whenever meeting with staff members or colleagues, avoiding outside meetings or social engagements, and undergoing another test upon returning home. It won't be the first time lawmakers convened outside of the current Statehouse, which welcomed its first session in 1877. In recent history, the legislative chambers were undergoing renovation when then-Gov. George Ryan called a special session in the summer of 2000 to temporarily remove the state sales tax on gasoline during a price spike. Sessions were conducted in the auditorium of the Howlett Building next door to the Capitol. ___ Check out more of the AP's coronavirus coverage at https://apnews.com/VirusOutbreak and https://apnews.com/UnderstandingtheOutbreak ___ Follow Political Writer John O'Connor at https://twitter.com/apoconnor Claim: Safety measures to govern Legislature's return to capital.
Example Output: The Illinois General Assembly will return to Springfield for three days next week to take up a spring session workload long delayed by the coronavirus pandemic.

Example Input: Paragraph: More than 100 deer in Iowa County were euthanized last month after about 20 tested positive for the disease, The La Crosse Tribune reported . Veterinarians and animal health technicians from the Wisconsin Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection and the U.S. Department of Agriculture-Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service sedated the animals before euthanizing them. The deer had been quarantined since October, when the DATCP confirmed a deer shot on a Waupaca County hunting ranch tested positive for the disease. The deer was traced back to the Iowa County farm. Nearly 80 deer in the county that were 16 months old or older were tested for the disease. Chronic wasting disease is a neurological disorder found in deer, elk and moose. It's caused by an infectious protein that affects the animal's brain. State and federal indemnity programs will compensate the deer farm, though an amount has yet to be determined. ___ Information from: La Crosse Tribune, http://www.lacrossetribune.com Claim: Officials: Wisconsin deer herd put down due to disease.
Example Output: An entire herd of whitetail deer on a farm in southwest Wisconsin has been euthanized because of chronic wasting disease, state agriculture officials said.

Example Input: Paragraph: "The cost of the drugs was not mentioned. And the possible cost-effectiveness ramifications of the research were not mentioned. As is often the case with 70% of the stories we review, cost just doesn't seem to matter. But we all know it does. The benefits are given only in relative, not absolute terms. See our primer on this topic. So when the story says ""24 percent lower incidence of dementia"" or ""The risk was 19 percent lower"" or ""The risk was nearly halved"" readers need to know 24%of what? 19% of what? Half of what? One harm was mentioned ""There are potential hazards, such as too-low blood pressure that can lead to damaging falls."" That's an incomplete listing, but we'll give the story the benefit of the doubt in at least nodding in the direction of potential harms. The story did state: ""The new report describes an observational study, one that lacks the strict controls that are needed for convincing proof."" And it further quoted the lead researcher saying, ""Any study like this is hypothesis-generating. You only know for sure when you have done clinical prospective trials."" So we'll give it a satisfactory grade. But we do with mixed feelings. That's because we're troubled when the story talks about ""a small but protective effect"" and uses active verbs to say the drugs ""may stave off dementia."" That is terribly misleading to the reader. ""Protective effect"" when you state in the story this is not convincing proof of cause and effect? Blogger Emlly DeVoto wrote about the problem with causal language used in a Guardian article on the same study. There is no overt disease-mongering of dementia in the story. The story did quote one independent expert who injected a cautionary note in addition to the lead researcher. The story did note other observational studies that have ""implicated various molecules"" in dementia. We'll again give the story the benefit of the doubt on this criterion. Although never explicity stated, the widespread availability of angiotensin inhibiting drugs can be inferred from the story. The story doesn't frame the new study into the context of past research linking high blood pressure to dementia. There's no evidence that the story relied on a news release." Claim: Some Blood Pressure Drugs May Stave Off Dementia
Example Output:
Generally well done though the story may have been, we're troubled when a story talks about "a small but protective effect" and uses active verbs to say the drugs "may stave off dementia" when it also states in the story this is not convincing proof of cause and effect. Then how can you have a protective effect? Association, maybe? Causation and protection, not yet. This is an important and intriguing area of research. But stories that make it sound as though cause-and-effect has been proven when it hasn't don't do a service to public understanding. See how blogger Emlly DeVoto wrote about the same problem with causal language used in a Guardian article on the same study.