QUESTION: You both may already by aware of this, but the online team has contacted me and it is their desire to have the Japanese & Australian products also offered out of the U.S. by Enron North America. They would continue to be offered by their current companies, "Enron Australia" and "EnronJapan", but they want the products sold "24 hours a day" and I guess to do this they would be offered also by Enron North America. Do you see any legal issues from your side with a your Japanese or Australia products being offered by Enron North America too?
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: Japanese & Australian Products
Attached for your review and comments is Enron's Answer to Motion for Partial Summary Disposition by the Texas, New Mexico and Arizona full-requirements shippers in the complaint proceeding that they filed in July (RP01-486). The shippers have asked the Commission to (a) summarily determine that El Paso's mainline capacity is not adequate to serve its existing firm customers and (b) expeditiously establish a remedy phase in this proceeding. Enron's answer reiterates the comments it filed in the original proceeding, namely that the Commission should consolidate this proceeding with the complaint filed in RP01-484 by the Joint Complainants (producers, California LDCs) which also deals with issues of adequacy of capacity. We also reiterate and emphasize our original proposal that the Commission require El Paso to immediately give existing firm shippers the opportunity to turn back capacity they no longer need as one means of making additional capacity available to those who need more. You do not need to respond, but if you desire to, please get any comments back to me or Leslie by noon tomorrow. Thanks.
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: Please Respond by 12 noon CDT Friday, Sept. 21 -- El Paso Proceeding
Laura, I am attaching resume of Mark Mixon that Sally left you a voicemail regarding on Monday. If you are going to be in town and would like to see Mark, please let me know and I would be happy to make arrangements. Thanks,
Answer: Mark Mixon Resume
Here is an email: Cathy, At the request of Mitch Dutton, I have reviewed the form of 311 and intrastate gas transportation agreements provided to AEP by Duke Energy Guadalupe Pipeline, Inc. and by EPGT Texas Pipeline, L.P. As we discussed this morning, these agreements appear to be the standard form of agreement utilized by these counterparties. Although I have no authority to approve them for execution by AEP, had they been provided to me for execution by HPL, I would approve them for execution. Please note the Balancing and Penalties provision of the agreements for the charges which these parties could impose should receipts and deliveries get out of balance. If time permitted I would suggest that these charges be negotiated to something closer to the actual costs incurred by the transporter. However, it has been my experience that these parties are reluctant to change the standard form for standard transportation services. No contract documents have been provided concerning the TXU Lone Star Pipeline. The only documents faxed were two transportation services request forms.
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: Gas Transportation Agreements
Here is an email: Sara, As we discussed, we would like to notify our customers of our current status and our ability to look after them. Here is a brief summary of the services contracts and obligations that we currently have along with the notification letter we would like to send them. Please let us know if we are ok to send these out. Thanks,
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A:
Services Contracts