In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Comment: So women, a protected class, are less worthy of a college education preference than those who are non-white.

I wonder how the gays, lesbians, transgendered and other 'protected' classes will fit into the paradigm which says racial preferences are the most important.

Will there be a sliding scale?
Non-sexual-explicit

Comment: Rules about sex, formulated by the celibate, based on dubious interpretations of scripture (which says NOTHING about oral sex, for example) and grounded in the silly opinion that sexual activity has to be "justified" by saying it must be for procreation (a view that owes more to the Gnostics, the Neoplatonists and the Roman Stoics than scripture) are less than compelling.
Sexual-explicit

Comment: Interesting how this article downplays the outrage over the homophobic aspect of the comment, i.e. the worse insult one can think of is to get people imagining Trump having sex with another man, i.e. Putin.
One must assume because gay sex is disgusting, and emasculating?

Kind of like those who think calling Trudeau "Justine" is the epitome of insult, i.e. emasculating.
Sexual-explicit