QUESTION: Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "A man with a machete sitting and cutting a piece of fruit."
Hypothesis: "A man is throwing fruit around."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell

Let's solve it slowly: The man cannot be throwing fruit around and cutting a piece of fruit with a machete simultaneously.
The answer is no.

[QUESTION] Premise: "This young goggle-eyed kid is enjoying a dip in the lake."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A human in a lake." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A human in a lake implies a dip in the lake.
The answer is yes.

Q: Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "A kid is skateboarding in the suburbs."
Hypothesis: "A kid rides his bike home."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
A: A kid riding his skateboard can not also be riding his bike.
The answer is no.

QUESTION: Given the sentence "A baseball player reaches for a ball." can we conclude that "A batter swings and misses."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Let's solve it slowly: A baseball player swinging and a player who reaches for a ball imply two different activities.
The answer is no.

[QUESTION] Given the sentence "A baby is dressed up in pink gear and staring while an adult holds her steady." can we conclude that "A man is holding his daughter wearing nike clothing."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
An adult holding a girl doesn't necessarily mean they are a man or her father. Pink gear isn't necessarily Nike.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

Q: If "Three men stand together with two pairs of scales beside large heaps of fresh vegetables." does that mean that "Men are weighing hamsters."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A:
If they are weighing hamsters then they would not be beside vegetables at the same time.
The answer is no.