In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

[EX Q]: Comment: Obviously the media wants us to vote for Hilary, their coverage is so slanted. And how did this get turned into Trump "forcing women into sex?"
[EX A]: Sexual-explicit

[EX Q]: Comment: Now, here's a few problems with what you wrote.
You assume men have higher sex drives. They don't nor ever had, otherwise the pill wouldn't have made a difference, if men wanted it more and that's what gave women power over men then they'd still have that power. Somehow they don't. And yet it seems sex wasn't the power they held, weirdly enough we hear a lot about past "shotgun weddings", let me tell you something poor women worked, dad was liable to fund them until they married and yet there was were shotgun weddings concentrated.
And yet a lot of wedlock kids happened with kids who still saw their daddies and were directly supported by them but mom wanted nothing with dad. So it seems women were still fucking for the reason they always fucked, fucking itself. Women lined up the docks for the same reasons girls line up the sports block, to see hot men who are there to work not please them sexually.
[EX A]: Sexual-explicit

[EX Q]: Comment: I think many believe we are way past these forms of pacifism to fix what is clearly a social war with the fundamentals of Islam and continue to find a way to let it live in our society.
I think the average person is sick and tired and had it all with the enabling and appeasement of this religion of hate that at the very least has rank intolerance for others outside its sick self and has little interest in assimilating into our society.
I feel a crusade coming on. It won't be islamophobia.. it will be a call to arms to protect our western civilization. No words will stop this only action.
[EX A]:
Non-sexual-explicit