Problem: Here is a premise:
David Duke is back.

Here is a hypothesis:
David Duke never came back.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Sentence 1: GAO, perhaps more than any other organization, is positioned through its broadbased skills, knowledge, and expertise to support the Congress in meeting responsibilities that will only become more difficult as the 21st century evolves.

Sentence 2: GAO is going to help Congress with a changing century.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: yes

Question:
Bob and Elizabeth Dole chatted with Frank Sesno on Late Edition for no good reason.

Does it follow that "There were good reasons for Bob and Elizabeth Dole to chat with Frank Sesno."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
no

Q: If He was independent., can we say that "He didn't get money from anyone else."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A: it is not possible to tell

Premise:
"His shows are more 700 Club than Crossfire . His guests almost always share Moyers' belief about the topic at hand."
Hypothesis: Moyers' belief usually seems to be factually accurate and reasonable.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

it is not possible to tell

Sentence 1: you don't find that much in small companies because you can kind of interface but when you get a big company like ours i think it's great that they take the time to you know give us a monthly meeting to tell us what's going on

Sentence 2: They tell us what's going on during a monthly meeting.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer:
yes