You will be given a definition of a task first, then an example. Follow the example to solve a new instance of the task.
In this task, you are given text for US Congressional and California state bills, your task is to generate a summary for this bill.

SECTION 1. LIABILITY OF BUSINESS ENTITIES PROVIDING USE OF FACILITIES
TO NONPROFIT ORGANIZATIONS.

(a) Definitions.--In this section:
(1) Business entity.--The term ''business entity'' means a
firm, corporation, association, partnership, consortium, joint
venture, or other form of enterprise.
(2) Facility.--The term ''facility'' means any real
property, including any building, improvement, or appurtenance.
(3) Gross negligence.--The term ''gross negligence'' means
voluntary and conscious conduct by a person with knowledge (at
the time of the conduct) that the conduct is likely to be
harmful to the health or well-being of another person.
(4) Intentional misconduct.--The term ''intentional
misconduct'' means conduct by a person with knowledge (at the
time of the conduct) that the conduct is harmful to the health
or well-being of another person.
(5) Nonprofit organization.--The term ''nonprofit
organization'' means--
(A) any organization described in section 501(c)(3)
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and exempt from
tax under section 501(a) of such Code; or
(B) any not-for-profit organization organized and
conducted for public benefit and operated primarily for
charitable, civic, educational, religious, welfare, or
health purposes.
(6) State.--The term ''State'' means each of the several
States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto
Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, the Northern
Mariana Islands, any other territory or possession of the
United States, or any political subdivision of any such State,
territory, or possession.
(b) Limitation on Liability.--
(1) In general.--Subject to subsection (c), a business
entity shall not be subject to civil liability relating to any
injury or death occurring at a facility of the business entity
in connection with a use of such facility by a nonprofit
organization if--
(A) the use occurs outside of the scope of business
of the business entity;
(B) such injury or death occurs during a period
that such facility is used by the nonprofit
organization; and
(C) the business entity authorized the use of such
facility by the nonprofit organization.
(2) Application.--This subsection shall apply--
(A) with respect to civil liability under Federal
and State law; and
(B) regardless of whether a nonprofit organization
pays for the use of a facility.
(c) Exception for Liability.--Subsection (b) shall not apply to an
injury or death that results from an act or omission of a business
entity that constitutes gross negligence or intentional misconduct,
including any misconduct that--
(1) constitutes a crime of violence (as that term is
defined in section 16 of title 18, United States Code) or act
of international terrorism (as that term is defined in section
2331 of title 18) for which the defendant has been convicted in
any court;
(2) constitutes a hate crime (as that term is used in the
Hate Crime Statistics Act (28 U.S.C. 534 note));
(3) involves a sexual offense, as defined by applicable
State law, for which the defendant has been convicted in any
court; or
(4) involves misconduct for which the defendant has been
found to have violated a Federal or State civil rights law.
(d) Superseding Provision.--
(1) In general.--Subject to paragraph (2) and subsection
(e), this Act preempts the laws of any State to the extent that
such laws are inconsistent with this Act, except that this Act
shall not preempt any State law that provides additional
protection from liability for a business entity for an injury
or death with respect to which conditions under subparagraphs
(A) through (C) of subsection (b)(1) apply.
(2) Limitation.--Nothing in this Act shall be construed to
supersede any Federal or State health or safety law.
(e) Election of State Regarding Nonapplicability.--This Act shall
not apply to any civil action in a State court against a business
entity in which all parties are citizens of the State if such State
enacts a statute--
(1) citing the authority of this subsection;
(2) declaring the election of such State that this Act
shall not apply to such civil action in the State; and
(3) containing no other provision.
Solution: Shields a business entity from civil liability relating to any injury or death occurring at a facility of that entity in connection with a use of such facility by a nonprofit organization if: (1) the use occurs outside the scope of business of the business entity; (2) such injury or death occurs during a period that such facility is used by such organization; and (3) the business entity authorized the use of such facility by the organization.
Makes this Act inapplicable to an injury or death that results from an act or omission of a business entity that constitutes gross negligence or intentional misconduct, including misconduct that: (1) constitutes a hate crime or a crime of violence or act of international terrorism for which the defendant has been convicted in any court; or (2) involves a sexual offense for which the defendant has been convicted in any court or misconduct for which the defendant has been found to have violated a Federal or State civil rights law.
Preempts State laws to the extent that such laws are inconsistent with this Act, except State law that provides additional protection from liability. Specifies that this Act shall not be construed to supersede any Federal or State health or safety law.
Makes this Act inapplicable to any civil action in a State court against a business entity in which all parties are citizens of the State if such State, citing this Act's authority and containing no other provision, enacts a statute declaring the State's election that this Act shall not apply to such action in the State.
Why? This Bill focuses on shielding business entities from civil liability relating to an injury or death depending on the conditions of injury, hence the generated summary is correct.

New input: SECTION 1. HATE CRIMES.

(a) Declarations.--Congress declares that--
(1) further efforts must be taken at all levels of
government to respond to the staggering brutality of hate
crimes that have riveted public attention and shocked the
Nation;
(2) hate crimes are prompted by bias and are committed to
send a message of hate to targeted communities, usually defined
on the basis of immutable traits;
(3) the prominent characteristic of a hate crime is that it
devastates not just the actual victim and the victim's family
and friends, but frequently savages the community sharing the
traits that caused the victim to be selected;
(4) any efforts undertaken by the Federal Government to
combat hate crimes must respect the primacy that States and
local officials have traditionally been accorded in the
criminal prosecution of acts constituting hate crimes; and
(5) an overly broad reaction by the Federal Government to
this serious problem might ultimately diminish the
accountability of State and local officials in responding to
hate crimes and transgress the constitutional limitations on
the powers vested in Congress under the Constitution.
(b) Studies.--
(1) Collection of data.--
(A) Definition of hate crime.--In this paragraph,
the term ''hate crime'' means--
(i) a crime described in subsection (b)(1)
of the first section of the Hate Crime
Statistics Act (28 U.S.C. 534 note); and
(ii) a crime that manifests evidence of
prejudice based on gender or age.
(B) Collection from cross-section of states.--Not
later than 120 days after the date of enactment of this
Act, the Comptroller General of the United States, in
consultation with the National Governors' Association,
shall select 10 jurisdictions with laws classifying
certain types of crimes as hate crimes and 10
jurisdictions without such laws from which to collect
data described in subparagraph (C) over a 12-month
period.
(C) Data to be collected.--The data to be collected
are--
(i) the number of hate crimes that are
reported and investigated;
(ii) the percentage of hate crimes that are
prosecuted and the percentage that result in
conviction;
(iii) the length of the sentences imposed
for crimes classified as hate crimes within a
jurisdiction, compared with the length of
sentences imposed for similar crimes committed
in jurisdictions with no hate crime laws; and
(iv) references to and descriptions of the
laws under which the offenders were punished.
(D) Costs.--Participating jurisdictions shall be
reimbursed for the reasonable and necessary costs of
compiling data under this paragraph.
(2) Study of trends.--
(A) In general.--Not later than 18 months after the
date of enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General
of the United States and the General Accounting Office
shall complete a study that analyzes the data collected
under paragraph (1) and under the Hate Crime Statistics
Act of 1990 to determine the extent of hate crime
activity throughout the country and the success of
State and local officials in combating that activity.
(B) Identification of trends.--In the study
conducted under subparagraph (A), the Comptroller
General of the United States and the General Accounting
Office shall identify any trends in the commission of
hate crimes specifically by--
(i) geographic region;
(ii) type of crime committed; and
(iii) the number of hate crimes that are
prosecuted and the number for which convictions
are obtained.
(c) Model Statute.--
(1) In general.--To encourage the identification and
prosecution of hate crimes throughout the country, the Attorney
General shall, through the National Conference of Commissioners
on Uniform State Laws of the American Law Institute or another
appropriate forum, and in consultation with the States, develop
a model statute to carry out the goals described in subsection
(a) and criminalize acts classified as hate crimes.
(2) Requirements.--In developing the model statute, the
Attorney General shall--
(A) include in the model statute crimes that
manifest evidence of prejudice; and
(B) prepare an analysis of all reasons why any
crime motivated by prejudice based on any traits of a
victim should or should not be included.
(d) Support for Criminal Investigations and Prosecutions by State
and Local Law Enforcement Officials.--
(1) Assistance other than financial assistance.--
(A) In general.--At the request of a law
enforcement official of a State or a political
subdivision of a State, the Attorney General, acting
through the Director of the Federal Bureau of
Investigation, shall provide technical, forensic,
prosecutorial, or any other form of assistance in the
criminal investigation or prosecution of any crime
that--
(i) constitutes a crime of violence (as
defined in section 16 of title 18, United
States Code);
(ii) constitutes a felony under the laws of
the State; and
(iii) is motivated by prejudice based on
the victim's race, ethnicity, or religion or is
a violation of the State's hate crime law.
(B) Priority.--In providing assistance under
subparagraph (A), the Attorney General shall give
priority to crimes committed by offenders who have
committed crimes in more than 1 State.
(2) Grants.--
(A) In general.--There is established a grant
program within the Department of Justice to assist
State and local officials in the investigation and
prosecution of hate crimes.
(B) Eligibility.--A State or political subdivision
of a State applying for assistance under this paragraph
shall--
(i) describe the purposes for which the
grant is needed; and
(ii) certify that the State or political
subdivision lacks the resources necessary to
investigate or prosecute the hate crime.
(C) Deadline.--An application for a grant under
this paragraph shall be approved or disapproved by the
Attorney General not later than 24 hours after the
application is submitted.
(D) Grant amount.--A grant under this paragraph
shall not exceed $100,000 for any single case.
(E) Report.--Not later than December 31, 2001, the
Attorney General, in consultation with the National
Governors' Association, shall submit to Congress a
report describing the applications made for grants
under this paragraph, the award of such grants, and the
effectiveness of the grant funds awarded.
(F) Authorization of appropriations.--There is
authorized to be appropriated to carry out this
paragraph $5,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2000 and
2001.
(e) Interstate Travel To Commit Hate Crime.--
(1) In general.--Chapter 13 of title 18, United States
Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:
''Sec. 249. Interstate travel to commit hate crime
''(a) In General.--A person, whether or not acting under color of
law, who--
''(1) travels across a State line or enters or leaves
Indian country in order, by force or threat of force, to
willfully injure, intimidate, or interfere with, or by force or
threat of force to attempt to injure, intimidate, or interfere
with, any person because of the person's race, color, religion,
or national origin; and
''(2) by force or threat of force, willfully injures,
intimidates, or interferes with, or by force or threat of force
attempts to willfully injure, intimidate, or interfere with any
person because of the person's race, color, religion, or
national origin,
shall be subject to a penalty under subsection (b).
''(b) Penalties.--A person described in subsection (a) who is
subject to a penalty under this subsection--
''(1) shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more
than 1 year, or both;
''(2) if bodily injury results or if the violation includes
the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous
weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title,
imprisoned not more than 10 years, or both; or
''(3) if death results or if the violation includes
kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or
an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to
kill--
''(A) shall be fined under this title, imprisoned
for any term of years or for life, or both; or
''(B) may be sentenced to death.''.
(2) Technical amendment.--The analysis for chapter 13 of
title 18, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end
the following:

''249. Interstate travel to commit hate crime.''.
Solution:
Specifies data to be collected (i.e., the number of hate crimes reported and investigated, percentage of hate crimes prosecuted and resulting in a conviction, the length of sentences imposed in comparison with that imposed for similar crimes committed in jurisdictions without hate crime laws, and references to and descriptions of laws under which the offenders were punished).
Requires the Comptroller General and GAO to identify any trends in the commission of hate crimes by geographic region, type of crime committed, and the number of hate crimes prosecuted and the number for which convictions are obtained.
Directs the Attorney General: (1) to develop a model statute to criminalize acts classified as hate crimes; and (2) in developing such statute, to include crimes that manifest evidence of prejudice and to prepare an analysis of all reasons why any crime motivated by prejudice based on any traits of a victim should or should not be included.
Directs the Attorney General: (1) at the request of a law enforcement official of a State or political subdivision thereof, to provide assistance in the criminal investigation or prosecution of any crime that constitutes a crime of violence or a felony under State law and that is motivated by prejudice based on the victim's race, ethnicity, or religion or that is a violation of the State's hate crime law; and (2) in providing such assistance, to give priority to crimes committed by offenders who have committed crimes in more than one State.
Establishes a grant program within the Department of Justice to assist State and local officials in the investigation and prosecution of hate crimes. Sets forth eligibility, reporting, and other requirements. Authorizes appropriations.
Prohibits and sets penalties (including the death penalty under specified circumstances) for: (1) traveling across a State line, or entering or leaving Indian country, in order to willfully injure, intimidate, or interfere with any person because of that person's race, color, religion, or national origin; and (2) by force or threat of force, willfully injuring, intimidating, or interfering with any person because of that person's race, color, religion, or national origin.