In this task, you are given text for US Congressional and California state bills, your task is to generate a summary for this bill.

[EX Q]: SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ''Community Building Code
Administration Grant Act of 2007''.

SEC. 2. GRANT PROGRAM AUTHORIZED.

(a) Grant Authorization.--The Secretary of Housing and Urban
Development shall provide grants to local building code enforcement
departments.
(b) Competitive Awards.--The Secretary shall award grants under
subsection (a) on a competitive basis pursuant to the criteria set
forth in section 6, but also taking into consideration the following:
(1) The financial need of each building code enforcement
department.
(2) The benefit to the local jurisdiction of having an
adequately funded building code enforcement department.
(3) The demonstrated ability of each building code
enforcement department to work cooperatively with other local
code enforcement offices, health departments, and local
prosecutorial agencies.
(c) Maximum Amount.--The maximum amount of any grant awarded under
this section shall not exceed $1,000,000.

SEC. 3. REQUIRED ELEMENTS IN GRANT PROPOSALS.

In order to be eligible for a grant under section 2, a local
building code enforcement department shall submit to the Secretary the
following:
(1) A demonstration of the jurisdiction's needs in
executing building code enforcement administration.
(2) A plan for the use of any funds received under this Act
that addresses the needs discussed in paragraph (1) and that is
consistent with the authorized uses established in section 4.
(3) A plan for local governmental actions to be taken to
establish and sustain local building code enforcement
administration functions, without continuing Federal support,
at a level at least equivalent to that proposed in the grant
application.
(4) A plan to create and maintain a program of public
outreach that includes a regularly updated and readily
accessible means of public communication, interaction, and
reporting regarding the services and work of the local building
code enforcement department to be supported by the grant.
(5) A plan for ensuring the timely and effective
administrative enforcement of building safety and fire
prevention violations.

SEC. 4. USE OF FUNDS; MATCHING FUNDS.

(a) Authorized Uses.--Grants awarded under section 2 may be used by
the grant recipient to supplement existing State or local funding for
building code enforcement administration. Such funds may be used to
increase staffing, provide staff training, increase staff competence
and professional qualifications, support individual certification or
departmental accreditation, or for capital expenditures specifically
dedicated to the administration of the local building code enforcement
department.
(b) Matching Funds Required.--
(1) In general.--To be eligible to receive a grant under
this Act, a local building code enforcement department
serving--
(A) a community that is very economically
disadvantaged, shall provide matching, non-Federal
funds in an amount equal to not less than 5 percent of
the total amount of any grant to be awarded under this
Act;
(B) a community that is moderately economically
disadvantaged, shall provide matching, non-Federal
funds in an amount equal to not less than 10 percent of
the total amount of any grant to be awarded under this
Act; or
(C) any other community, shall provide matching,
non-Federal funds in an amount equal to not less than
20 percent of the total amount of any grant to be
awarded under this Act.
(2) Economic distress.--
(A) In general.--The Secretary may waive the
matching fund requirements under paragraph (1), and
institute, by regulation, new matching fund
requirements based upon the level of economic distress
of the local jurisdiction in which the local building
code enforcement department seeking such grant is
located.
(B) Content of regulations.--Any regulations
instituted under subparagraph (A) shall include--
(i) a method that allows for a comparison
of the degree of economic distress among the
local jurisdictions of grant applicants, as
measured by the differences in the extent of
growth lag, the extent of poverty, and the
adjusted age of housing in such jurisdiction;
and
(ii) any other factor determined to be
relevant by the Secretary in assessing the
comparative degree of economic distress among
such local jurisdictions.
(c) In-Kind Contributions.--In determining the non-Federal share
required to be provided under subsection (b), the Secretary shall
consider in-kind contributions, not to exceed 50 percent of the amount
that the department contributes in non-Federal funds.
(d) Waiver of Matching Requirement.--The Secretary shall waive the
matching fund requirements under subsection (b) for any recipient
jurisdiction that has legislatively dedicated all building code
permitting fees to the conduct of local building code enforcement.

SEC. 5. RATING AND RANKING OF APPLICATIONS.

Eligible applications shall be rated and ranked according to the
criteria described in section 6. All complete applications will be
compared to one another and points assigned on a continuum within each
criterion, with the maximum points awarded to the application that best
meets the criterion.

SEC. 6. CRITERIA.

(a) Need and Community Benefit From Code Enforcement Grant Funds.--
Applications shall be rated and ranked on the degree to which the
application demonstrates the intent and means to ensure cooperative and
effective working relationships between local building code enforcement
officials and other local agencies, as well as a community-oriented
approach to building code enforcement, with the award of points as
follows:

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Description Maximum Points
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A detailed description of the capital expenditures to be acquired with 0-10
grant funds and a demonstration that the items' costs are reasonable.
The jurisdiction's need for the capital expenditure and how the grant 0-10
funds will fulfill this need.
The joint benefits provided by the proposed expenditure for the 0-5
following groups or activities: Provide a brief explanation of the
benefit. (1 point will be awarded for each response, 5 points maximum).
1. Code enforcement program.
2. Community or jurisdiction.
3. Interdisciplinary code enforcement team.
4. Housing preservation, rehabilitation programs, or neighborhood
improvement programs.
5. Special needs groups (disabled, elderly or low or very-low income,
etc.).
Does the proposed capital expenditure provide a cost savings benefit to 0-5
the jurisdiction? Provide a brief explanation of the cost savings.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(b) Current Code Enforcement and Housing Conservation Plan.--Each
application shall be rated and ranked on the degree to which the local
legislative body in which the applicant resides adopted a ''plan''
which addresses residential structure conservation and building code
enforcement, with the award of points as follows:

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Description Maximum Points
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The plan provides for proactive code enforcement (not just responding to 10
complaints), an interdisciplinary approach, and includes funding
options for repairs and rehabilitation.
The plan only provides for proactive code enforcement (not just 8
responding to complaints) and calls for an interdisciplinary approach
and does not address funding options for repairs and rehabilitation.
The plan provides for some type of proactive code enforcement (other 6
than just responding to complaints) but doesn't address coordinated
interdisciplinary activities with other local public agencies or
funding options.
The plan provides for only reactive code enforcement. 4
The plan only refers to a need to preserve and/or improve existing 2
housing stock, without any code enforcement program.
No existing plan. 0
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(c) Community-Oriented or Interdisciplinary Code Enforcement.--Each
application shall be rated and ranked on the degree to which the
application demonstrates the intent and means to ensure cooperative and
effective working relationships between building code enforcement
officials and other local agencies, as well as a community-oriented
approach to code enforcement, with the award of points as follows:

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Description Maximum Points
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Identify current or proposed interdisciplinary code enforcement programs 0-10
or activities and the team members (example: code enforcement, police,
local prosecutors, health department, building and planning, fire,
etc.). Provide a description of the team's code enforcement and
coordination procedures, activities and services provided. If the
current programs or resources are limited in scope, explain how receipt
of the grant will be used to improve the program.
Identify current or proposed community-oriented code enforcement 0-10
programs, activities or services. (Examples: community clean-ups,
Neighborhood Watch programs, community meetings, door-to-door code
enforcement knock and talks, etc.). If the current programs or
resources are limited in scope, explain how receipt of the grant will
be used to improve the program.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(d) Proactive Code Enforcement Activities.--Each application shall
be rated and ranked on the effectiveness of the proposed or existing
proactive activities and programs operated by any existing building
code enforcement program, with the award of points as follows:

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Description Maximum Points
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Encourages repairs and preservation, rather than demolition or 0-5
abandonment, of substandard residences.
Abatement of (a) lead hazards and lead-based paints, (b) toxic molds and 0-5
dampness, and (c) displacement or relocation of residents.
Community clean-up campaigns, which may include recycling dates, free or 0-5
reduced disposal rates at dumpsite, public clean-up days that encourage
removal of unwanted or excess debris by making available extra trash
pick-ups, dumpsites or trash or recycling containers on specific dates
to dispose of household debris, inoperable vehicles, tires, toxic
materials, etc.
Resource or referral programs for Federal, State, local, and private 0-5
funds and other resources available in your jurisdiction that can
assist with housing rehabilitation and repairs to rectify code
violations.
Public education programs on housing issues. These could include 0-5
community housing meetings dealing with homeownership, tenant/landlord
issues, housing code enforcement, school age children's programs with
coloring books or handouts, housing safety pamphlets, etc.
Programs that encourage community involvement with groups; such as 0-5
schools, church non-profits, community service groups, utility
companies, local stores, housing agency banks, etc.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(e) Capacity To Financially and Technically Support Proposed
Capital Expenditures.--Each application shall be rated and ranked on
the degree to which the application demonstrates the jurisdiction's
financial and technical capacity to properly use and successfully
support the proposed capital expenditure during the term of the grant,
with the award of points as follows:

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Description Maximum Points
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The anticipated ongoing program funding for the duration of the grant 0-5
program is adequate to financially support the use of the grant-
financed equipment. Include details of funding and technical support
sources for the capital expenditure (examples: insurance, paper,
maintenance, training, supplies, personnel, monthly billing costs,
etc.).
The jurisdiction has the technical capabilities to use and support 0-5
equipment (examples: adequately trained staff or resources to provide
training to operate technical equipment, local service provider for
cell phones or 2-way radios, trained personnel to operate equipment,
etc.).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

SEC. 7. EVALUATION AND REPORT.

(a) In General.--Grant recipients shall--
(1) be obligated to fully account and report for the use of
all grants funds; and
(2) provide a report to the Secretary on the effectiveness
of the program undertaken by the grantee and any other criteria
requested by the Secretary for the purpose of indicating the
effectiveness of, and ideas for, refinement of the grant
program.
(b) Report.--The report required under subsection (a)(2) shall
include a discussion of--
(1) the specific capabilities and functions in local
building code enforcement administration that were addressed
using funds received under this Act;
(2) the lessons learned in carrying out the plans supported
by the grant; and
(3) the manner in which the programs supported by the grant
are to be maintained by the grantee.
(c) Content of Reports.--The Secretary shall--
(1) require each recipient of a grant under ths Act to file
interim and final reports under subsection (b) to ensure that
grant funds are being used as intended and to measure the
effectiveness and benefits of the grant program; and
(2) develop and maintain a means whereby the public can
access such reports, at no cost, via the Internet.

SEC. 8. DEFINITIONS.

For purposes of this Act, the following definitions shall apply:
(1) Building code enforcement department.--The term
''building code enforcement department'' means the building
code inspection or enforcement agency of a local jurisdiction.
(2) Jurisdiction.--The term ''jurisdiction'' means a city,
county, parish, city and county authority, or city and parish
authority having local authority to enforce building codes and
regulations and collect fees for building permits.
(3) Secretary.--The term ''Secretary'' means the Secretary
of Housing and Urban Development.

SEC. 9. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

(a) In General.--There are authorized to be appropriated
$100,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2008 through 2013 to the
Secretary of Housing and Urban Development to carry out the provisions
of this Act.
(b) Reservation.--From the amount made available under subsection
(a), the Secretary may reserve not more than 5 percent for
administrative costs.
(c) Availability.--Any funds appropriated pursuant to subsection
(a) shall remain available until expended.
[EX A]: Community Building Code Administration Grant Act of 2007 - Requires the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development to award grants, on a competitive basis and with federal matching funds, to qualified local building code enforcement departments to increase staffing, provide staff training, increase staff competence and professional qualifications, support individual certification or departmental accreditation, or for capital expenditures specifically dedicated to department administration.

Sets forth criteria for rating and ranking of grant proposals.

[EX Q]: SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE AND TABLE OF CONTENTS.

(a) Short Title.--This Act may be cited as the ''California Forest
Ecosystems Health Act''.
(b) Table of Contents.--The table of contents for this Act is as
follows:

Sec. 1. Short title and table of contents.
Sec. 2. Findings.
Sec. 3. Definitions.
Sec. 4. Ecosystem management plans for National Forest System lands in
California.
Sec. 5. Process for full implementation of ecosystem management plans.
Sec. 6. Research and monitoring program.
Sec. 7. Miscellaneous requirements.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

The Congress finds the following:
(1) Although people have had an active part in the
development and maintenance of forest structure and the
condition of the National Forest System lands in the State of
California for many years, recent forest management policies
have often resulted in a degeneration of the forest structure
and a loss of forest health and vigor.
(2) The Forest Service, through the judicious use of
ecosystem management, has an opportunity to reverse these
forest management policies and restore the health and vigor of
National Forest System lands in California.
(3) Ecosystems are dynamic and in a state of constant
change, and it is not possible to preserve a given ecosystem
condition in a static state over a period of time.
(4) The many and varied resources and uses of National
Forest System lands provide both tangible and intangible
benefits to the people of the United States.
(5) Although management of National Forest System lands in
California has traditionally placed first priority on the need
to produce maximum volumes of timber, the other multiple forest
resources and services are equally important to the people of
California and the United States.
(6) Ecosystem management must balance the needs of outdoor
recreation, range, timber, watershed, fish, and wildlife, as
required by the Multiple-Use Sustained-Yield Act of 1960 (16
U.S.C. 528 et seq.), as well as protect soil and air quality
and provide for forest research.
(7) National Forest System lands in California include some
of the most unique forest ecosystems in the world, including
giant sequoias, coastal redwoods, and bristlecone pines.
(8) Destructive forest fires classified by the Forest
Service as ''intense'' have occurred in unprecedented numbers
and size on the National Forest System lands in California in
recent years, and these fires pose a threat to the very health
of the forests and present a danger to human life and property.
(9) The Forest Service, through the judicious use of
ecosystem management, has an opportunity to reduce the
likelihood that fires classified as ''intense'' will occur with
such frequency and, at the same time, to improve forest vigor
and visitor safety.
(10) Ecosystem management that considers the needs of all
species and their ability to interact with the presence of
humans can integrate both the conservation needs of the many
species of the ecosystems and the multiple use activities of
humans.
(11) Identification of sound management options is both a
biological issue and a social issue, and the resulting
management policies must be socially acceptable, ecologically
sustainable, scientifically sound, legally responsible, and
economically viable.
(12) The results of management practices in local
ecosystems can have a profound effect on the levels of demand
for commodity outputs from other ecosystems around the world.

SEC. 3. DEFINITIONS.

For purposes of this Act:
(1) Adaptive management.--The term ''adaptive management''
means the experimental and monitored application of
scientifically derived management decisions to gain knowledge
that is then used to improve subsequent management decisions.
(2) Ecosystem.--The term ''ecosystem'' means a community of
organisms and its environment that functions as a unit.
(3) Ecosystem management.--The term ''ecosystem
management'' means the integration of ecological, economic, and
social factors to meet the biological needs of all associated
organisms and human needs through diverse, healthy, and
productive ecosystems, addressing resource supply,
conservation, and demand as opposed to a strategy for managing
individual species.
(4) Ecosystem management plans.--The terms ''ecosystem
management plans'' and ''plans'' mean the ecosystem management
plans for National Forest System lands in the State of
California required to be developed by section 4(a).
(5) National forest system.--The term ''National Forest
System'' has the meaning given that term in section 11(a) of
the Forest and Rangeland Renewable Resources Planning Act of
1974 (16 U.S.C. 1609(a)).
(6) Seral stages.--The term ''seral stages'' means the
various age or life stages of a vegetative community as it
progresses from initial establishment toward a climax stage or
equilibrium.
(7) Secretary.--The term ''Secretary'' means the Secretary
of Agriculture.
(8) Stand.--The term ''stand'' means an area within a
forest where the trees have similar characteristics with
respect to species composition, size, condition, and age.
(9) Vigor.--The term ''vigor'', with respect to forest
ecosystems, means the relative health of stands of trees and
related vegetation, including their actual growth rates as
compared with potential growth rates and their ability to
protect themselves naturally from forest pests, diseases, and
the effects of natural disaster.

SEC. 4. ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT PLANS FOR NATIONAL FOREST SYSTEM LANDS IN
CALIFORNIA.

(a) Plans Required.--Notwithstanding the planning provisions of
section 6 of the Forest and Rangeland Renewable Resources Planning Act
of 1974 (16 U.S.C. 1604), the Secretary of Agriculture shall develop
and implement ecosystem management plans pursuant to this Act to
develop and demonstrate ecosystem management, including adaptive
management techniques, for National Forest System lands described in
subsection (b).
(b) Federal Lands Covered by Plans.--The ecosystem management plans
required by subsection (a) shall apply to all management units of the
National Forest System located in the State of California. In the case
of National Forest System lands in California that have been designated
by law for special management before the date of the enactment of this
Act, the Secretary shall incorporate into the ecosystem management
plans applicable to those lands any statutory provisions that are in
effect on such date and applicable to those lands.
(c) Principles of Plans.--Ecosystem management plans shall embody
the following principles:
(1) Application of management techniques that will enhance
the health and vigor of the renewable natural resources on the
National Forest System lands covered by the plans and provide
for the continued protection of the soil, air, and water
resources of these lands.
(2) Improvement of the forest ecosystems on these lands
toward desired forest conditions that--
(A) provide a mosaic of forest seral stages--
(i) representing a range of wildlife
habitats necessary to meet the needs of the
species indigenous to the ecosystem being
managed; and
(ii) designed in such a way as to obviate
the need for corridors or special management
areas to meet the needs of given species or
situations;
(B) minimize the danger of stand-destroying
uncontrolled wildfire;
(C) increase or maintain the health and vigor of
stands at a level that will permit the stands to resist
naturally, to the greatest degree practicable, insect
and disease attacks and the effects of other natural
disasters while incorporating the concern that some
level of dead-wood, both standing and down, is
desirable in healthy ecosystems;
(D) maintain the sustainable economic well-being
and stability of communities in areas dependent upon
national forest resources; and
(E) are developed, to the extent possible, with
consideration of the conditions that are known to have
existed on these lands or on similar lands before the
impacts of European settlement.
(3) Concentration of management activities on the condition
of the renewable resources of an ecosystem rather than on
producing targeted outputs, with projected outputs based upon
attainment of specific stand conditions.
(4) Emphasis on tangible management results rather than on
procedural standards and guidelines, but with development of
scientifically credible monitoring standards and guidelines to
assess both short- and long-term management results.
(5) Except for any statutory provisions incorporated under
subsection (b) with respect to specific lands, prohibition on
requiring the allocation or categorization of tracts of land
for specific preselected ecosystem management emphases.
(6) Consideration of the habitat needs of all species
across a broad landscape using management indicator species
whose presence will reflect a suitable amount and distribution
of particular habitat elements, rather than concentrating on
the needs of single species in a limited area.
(7) Application across the entire unreserved land base in
such a manner as to harmonize the various multiple uses.
(8) Incorporation of maximum flexibility in resource
decisionmaking through the use of adaptive management.
(d) Management to Promote Desired Forest Conditions.--
(1) In general.--Ecosystem management under the ecosystem
management plans shall be planned and practiced in a manner
that--
(A) considers the entire landscape in a management
unit of the National Forest System covered by a plan;
and
(B) benefits, to the extent practicable, all
renewable resources and the human resource in or
dependent upon the management unit.
(2) Individual projects.--Individual management projects in
a management unit of the National Forest System covered by the
ecosystem management plans shall be designed to provide
multiresource benefits, promote the desired forest conditions
described in subsection (c)(2), and achieve maximum project
operating efficiency.
(e) Selection of Acres for Ecosystem Management Activities.--
(1) Minimum acres.--Ecosystem management plans shall
specify the minimum number of acres on which ecosystem
management activities will be applied annually in any
management unit of the National Forest System covered by the
plans. Such acreage shall be determined on the basis of the
total number of acres in the management unit, the work to be
performed across the unit as a whole during the plan period,
and the pro rata annual acreage on which ecosystem management
activities must be applied in order to establish and maintain
the desired forest condition during the specified plan period.
(2) Effect of natural disasters.--In case of natural
disasters, such as wildfire, flood, windthrow, insect or
disease attack, a revision of the schedule of acres to be
treated may be granted by the Secretary in order to conduct
restoration and rehabilitation activities on the acres affected
by the natural disaster.
(f) Participation in Development.--To ensure that the ecosystem
management plans are economically, scientifically, and socially
acceptable, the Secretary shall develop the plans through the use of
public involvement programs that emphasize input from residents of
local communities to be affected by the plans. The Secretary shall
continue to consult with all interested persons in evaluating or
modifying the plans.

SEC. 5. PROCESS FOR FULL IMPLEMENTATION OF ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT PLANS.

(a) Implementation.--Beginning not later than January 1, 1995, the
Secretary shall begin to implement the ecosystem management plans. The
Secretary shall develop and implement the plans progressively over a
five-year period to ensure full application of all plans not later than
January 1, 2000, to all National Forest System lands described in
section 4(b). Upon implementation of an ecosystem management plan for
any portion of the lands described in such section, the plan shall
replace and supersede any land and resource management plan (or portion
of such a plan) then in effect for such lands.
(b) Yearly Expansion.--During each year of the period specified in
subsection (a), the Secretary shall expand application of the ecosystem
management plans to contiguous areas required to be covered by such
plans, as described in section 4(b). To the extent the Secretary
considers it to be necessary, the Secretary may modify the ecosystem
management plans for each new addition in order to incorporate the
lessons gained from experience. Adaptive management shall be used to
evaluate management decisions and to develop new information to be used
to keep the plans and subsequent management decisions up-to-date.
(c) Modification of Ecosystem Management Plans.--The Secretary
shall modify the ecosystem management plans to incorporate findings
from research, adaptive management projects, or monitoring to the
extent such findings indicate changes in the plans are necessary or
appropriate to achieve the principles described in section 4(c). Before
the end of the first two years of the period specified in subsection
(a), the Secretary shall issue regulations that set forth the process
to be used for any modification of the ecosystem management plans.
(d) Consistency.--Resource plans and permits and other instruments
for the use and occupancy of National Forest System lands covered by an
ecosystem management plan that are executed subsequent to the
implementation date of the plan with respect to such lands shall be
consistent with the plan. If the ecosystem management plan is modified,
resource plans and permits and other instruments that are executed
subsequent to the date of the modification shall be consistent with the
modified plan. Appropriate supplemental documents under the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) shall be
prepared for those resource plans and permits, contracts, and other
instruments in existence upon adoption of the ecosystem management plan
or any modification of the plan. Any revisions in existing resource
plans and permits, contracts, and other instruments shall be consistent
with the supplemental document findings and subject to the agreement of
all contractual parties. Any revision in present or future permits,
contracts, and other instruments made pursuant to this subsection shall
be subject to valid existing rights.

SEC. 6. RESEARCH AND MONITORING PROGRAM.

The Secretary shall describe in detail in the ecosystem management
plans and implement as part of the plans a targeted program of research
and monitoring aimed at measuring the effects of the management regimes
adopted under the plans. The Secretary shall ensure that monitoring is
sufficient to measure the responses of the various resources to
management practices and to provide a basis for adjustments of
subsequent management decisions.

SEC. 7. MISCELLANEOUS REQUIREMENTS.

(a) Increased Use of Certified Professional Practitioners.--With
respect to National Forest System lands covered by the ecosystem
management plans, the Secretary shall endeavor to increase the amount
of field work to be done by professional practitioners certified by the
Forest Service.
(b) Accountability Procedures.--The Secretary shall develop
accountability procedures to annually measure and inform the Congress
concerning the work (as described in section 4(e)) achieved through the
use of funds appropriated each year for National Forest System lands
covered by the ecosystem management plans. The selection of acres upon
which such work will be performed shall be controlled through the
planning process. The accountability procedures required by this
subsection shall be established and in operation before the end of the
first two years of the period specified in section 5(a) and shall be
designed to ensure the accomplishment of the work in accordance with
plan direction.
(c) Budgetary Considerations.--The Secretary shall develop budgets
for each management unit of the National Forest System covered by
ecosystem management plans on the basis of estimated benefits to the
various resources affected by the ecosystem management activities, and
such budgets will be justified on such basis. The Secretary shall
provide the managers of these units the flexibility to accomplish over-
all objectives within over-all budgets in lieu of requiring and
preparing detailed line-item budgets for each unit of work, except that
accountability procedures developed under subsection (b) shall include
requirements for detailed explanations of expenditures and estimates of
benefits for each resource.
[EX A]: California Forest Ecosystems Health Act - Directs the Secretary of Agriculture to develop and implement ecosystem management plans for National Forest System lands in California.

[EX Q]: SECTION 1. INDIAN EDUCATION ASSISTANCE TRUST FUNDS.

(a) Establishment.--
(1) Arizona fund.--
(A) In general.--There is established in the
Treasury of the United States a fund to be known as the
Interim Arizona InterTribal Education Assistance Trust
Fund subject to the same conditions as described for
the Arizona InterTribal Trust Fund in subsections (c)
and (d) of section 405 of the Arizona-Idaho
Conservation Act of 1988, Public Law 100-696
(hereinafter ''the Act'').
(B) Amounts in fund.--The fund established in
subparagraph (A) shall consist of such amounts as are
appropriated and allocated to the fund pursuant to
subsection (b).
(2) Navajo fund.--
(A) In general.--There is established in the
Treasury of the United States a fund to be known as the
Interim Navajo Education Assistance Trust Fund subject
to the same conditions as described for the Navajo
Trust Fund in subsections (c) and (d) of section 405 of
the Act.
(B) Amounts in fund.--The fund established in
subparagraph (A) shall consist of such amounts as are
appropriated and allocated to the fund pursuant to
subsection (b).
(b) Authorization of Appropriations.--
(1) In general.--There are authorized to be appropriated an
aggregate of $34,900,000 to the funds established in subsection
(a) to be allocated in accordance with paragraph (2). In no
case shall moneys appropriated pursuant to this authorization
diminish or otherwise reduce any Indian account.
(2) Allocation.--
(A) Arizona fund.--Sums appropriated pursuant to
paragraph (1) shall be allocated to the fund
established in subsection (a)(1) in the same manner as
sums are allocated to the Arizona InterTribal Trust
Fund pursuant to section 405 of the Act.
(B) Navajo fund.--Sums appropriated pursuant to
paragraph (1) shall be allocated to the fund
established in subsection (a)(2) in the same manner as
sums are allocated to the Navajo Trust Fund pursuant to
section 405 of such Act.
(c) Reimbursement.--
(1) In general.--
(A) Full appropriation.--Notwithstanding title IV
of such Act, if the full amount specified in subsection
(b)(1) is appropriated and allocated in accordance with
subsection (b) prior to the date on which the first
annual payment is required to be made by Collier to the
Arizona InterTribal Trust Fund and the Navajo Trust
Fund under title IV of such Act, and the Trust Fund
Payment Agreement required under section 403 of such
Act, the Secretary of the Interior shall direct Collier
to pay to the Secretary of the Treasury for deposit
into the general fund of the Treasury any amounts
otherwise due and payable to the United States under
the Trust Fund Payment Agreement, in lieu of and in
full satisfaction of payment to the United States by
Collier for deposit into the Arizona InterTribal Trust
Fund and the Navajo Trust Fund pursuant to title IV of
such Act and such Trust Fund Payment Agreement.
(B) Partial appropriation.--Notwithstanding title
IV of such Act, if less than the amount specified in
subsection (b)(1) is appropriated and allocated in
accordance with subsection (b) prior to the date
described in subparagraph (A), at such time as Collier
is required to make any payment under the Trust Fund
Payment Agreement described under subparagraph (A), the
Secretary of the Interior shall direct Collier to pay,
in full satisfaction and in lieu of such payment--
(i) to the Secretary of the Treasury for
deposit into the general fund of the Treasury,
an amount which bears the same proportion to
the total amount of such payment as the total
of the sums appropriated pursuant to subsection
(b) bears to $34,900,000, and
(ii) to the Secretary of the Interior for
deposit into the Arizona InterTribal Trust Fund
and Navajo Trust Fund, in accordance with
section 405 of the Act, the remainder of each
such payment.
(2) Definition.--As used in this subsection, the term
''Collier'' has the meaning provided under section 401(5) of
such Act.
(d) Termination.--
(1) In general.--The funds established in subsection (a)
shall terminate on the date of the first Collier payment
described in subsection (c)(1)(A).
(2) Transfer of remaining sums.--Upon termination under
paragraph (1)--
(A) The Secretary of the Treasury shall transfer
any sums remaining in the fund established in
subsection (a)(1) to the Arizona InterTribal Trust Fund
established under section 405(a) of such Act; and
(B) The Secretary of the Treasury shall transfer
any sums remaining in the fund established in
subsection (a)(2) to the Navajo Trust Fund established
under section 405(a) of such Act.
(e) No funds appropriated under this Act shall be available to the
InterTribal Council in Arizona (ITCA) and Navajo Tribe (as defined in
section 401 of the Act) or be deposited into the Interim Trust Funds
established by section 1 of this Act unless the ITCA and Navajo Tribe
provide written consent to the method of payment established in this
Act in lieu of the method of payment provided in the Act and the Trust
Fund Payment Agreement authorized by the Act.
[EX A]:
Establishes in the Treasury the Interim Arizona InterTribal Education Assistance Trust Fund and the Interim Navajo Education Assistance Trust Fund (interim education funds). Subjects such funds to the same conditions as those for the Arizona InterTribal Trust Fund and the Navajo Trust Fund (permanent funds) under the Arizona-Idaho Conservation Act of 1988.
Authorizes appropriations. Requires reimbursement of such sums to the Treasury by the Barron Collier Co. in fulfillment of its obligations under such Act.