We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

I realize that these anti-gun rights historians need to impress upon the 2nd Amendment a militia regulating action but there is no legal evidence of the 2nd being inspected or held to inform upon any aspect of militia powers.
Valid

The gun rights advocates I know are generally not like this, they support rights regardless if whther they agree with how they are being practiced or not.
Valid

How many of them grew up watching movies of Sylvester Stallone mowing down people with automatic gunfire, and movies where gangbangers has MAC-10s and bazookas?
Valid