Sentence 1: Originally a house, it was designed by Sir William Chambers and completed in 1772; the dome was added in 1858.

Sentence 2: The house was originally built in 1772, and the dome added 86 years later.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: yes

Question:
(If the loophole hadn't been there, you can be sure Fortune 500 companies would have been out in force lobbying against it.)

Does it follow that "If there was no loophole, Fortune 500 companies would not be lobbying in favor of it. "?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
yes

Q: If A Dutch and British cemetery is to be found farther down the hill., can we say that "Further down the hill, there is a Dutch and British cemetery."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A: yes

Premise:
"gosh there used to when i was a when i was a kid there was a Sinclair station about three blocks away that's where i used to go to pump up my tires and get my flats fixed and all of that"
Hypothesis: The Sinclair station was too far away for me to ever go there.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

no

input question: they'll say and here those of us at Dalmarva Power which is our power company you know we now recycle forty five percent of our solid waste and they If this premise is true, does that tell us:"at Dalmarva Power we recycle almost half of our solid waste now"?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: yes

Q: If That is not surprising., can we say that "That's really shocking."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A:
no