In this task, you must classify if a given review is positive/negative, indicating your answer as P or N.

Example Input: ' run lola run ' , a german import that gained a stellar reputation at the sundance film festival , is a dazzling and kinetic film that deals with the subjects of fate and chance .
for a berserk and retroactive 81 minutes of non - stop movement , we follow a fiery - haired heroine named lola ( franka potente ) as she sprints to save her boyfriend from the clutches of drug dealers .
lola has roughly twenty minutes to somehow retrieve 100 , 000 marks in time to save manni ( moritz bleibtreu ) from being killed by the dealer .
but , in something of a pseudo- ' groundhog day ' approach , director tom tykwer gives lola three separate chances to best navigate her way toward the goal .
in these trio of episodes , we gradually learn the unique effects of fate , for even if tiny changes are made in lola 's journey , the future can be seriously altered .
' run lola run ' is an experience like ' fight club ' or ' the matrix ' , in that each film takes you through a super - charged wormhole of bending reality in surreal and exciting ways .
in addition , all three movies have a visual style that separates them from the rest of the pack .
' lola ' is no exception , with stylish quick - flash camera work and cinematography that serves as scintillating eye candy from the get - go .
tykwer 's world is a landscape of mood and color , with brilliant shades of red and pink ( including lola 's fiery hair ) used as effective symbolism throughout .
with it 's visual style and mind - blowing pace , ' run lola run '
is one of the more invigorating movies of the year .
even more so when considering the fact it 's all stuffed rather nonchalantly into an 81-minute time period .
as a heroine , potente does little more than run wildly through the streets ( as the title suggests ) , but
she has a certain flair and charisma .
her exemplary running form made me wonder if she is actually a track star .
meanwhile , bleibtreu does an equally fantastic job of bringing the dopey but passionate manni to life .
both actors perform beyond the call of duty .
the dazzling fun comes from predicting what each episode holds in store for lola , and the outcome is ultimately rewarding - several twists and turns are unique and unexpected .
the other characters lola runs into ( both purposely and inadvertently ) include her banker father ( herbert kraup ) and a friendly security guard ( armin rohde ) , but aside from the two leads , no one has more than a few minutes of screen time .
additional stars that could n't possibly be ignored are cinematographer frank griebe and editor mathilde bonnefroy , who are both responsible for the film 's eye - catching visual elegance .
' run lola run ' is subtitled , so be prepared to meet the challenge of reading the lightning - fast dialogue - occasional sections of it are especially fast .
this is only one of the minor chores involved in watching .
the other is the sense that we never get to really recognize who the real people are in this hyperactive situation .
most are just chess pieces in tykwer 's elaborate game of visual presentation , and he never really makes a significant move with any .
but , the average viewer is likely to be
so absorbed in the action that few will realize the lack of potency in a few elements of the screenplay .
a few petty gripes aside , this film is a wild , exhilarating ride that turns maniacally on its wheel of originality .
most people believe foreign films are mainly boring , talky character studies .
perhaps ' run lola run ' will recharge their batteries .
not only does this film offer insight into some intriguing questions of fate and destiny , it also delivers a white - knuckle visual rollercoaster ride of overwhelming audacity .
like how the experience must have been for the persistent title character , ' run lola run ' is exhausting .
Example Output: P

Example Input: brian de palma 's snake eyes stars nicolas cage 's evil twin , who confusingly uses the same stage name as his talented brother .
like a foreign tourist who screams his lines in english to ensure that he will be understood , cage yells with the ferocity of a man with a bad case of caffeine overload . de palma , whose last great film , the untouchables , was crafted over a decade ago seems to have lost his magic .
in snake eyes , he manages to elicit some of the worst performances possible out of a skilled cast .
only gary sinise rises slightly above the hackneyed material .
the rest of the actors become caricatures in this by - the - numbers thriller .
ryuichi sakamoto 's atmospheric and melodramatic music dominates almost every scene .
heavy on the long violin notes , its rhythm is punctuated by thunder .
( the script by de palma and lost world 's david koepp sets the action during a hurricane in an attempt to pump up the adrenaline level and the noise .
only the latter is achieved . )
cage plays rick santoro ,
a corrupt atlantic city cop who shakes down criminals to get betting money .
the movie takes place over a single evening when a world championship fight is being held .
with a flashy , bad wardrobe and a gold cell phone , rick is an obnoxious cop who does n't know when to shut up . spouting cliched and ridiculous dialog
, he screams such lines as , " i was made for the sewer , baby ! "
actually the line is more apropos for the movie as a whole .
sinise plays kevin dunne , a naval officer who is in charge of the security for the secretary of the navy , who has come to watch the fight .
but most people in the film are not who they seem to be , and the thin script makes all of them easy to guess .
the plot , which is told in endless flashbacks , concerns the assassination of the secretary through a scheme set up by some malevolent businessmen ?
that adjective is , of course , redundant in hollywood thrillers .
the flashbacks become repetitious with the same scene shown again and again , sometimes from a different perspective and sometimes not .
although a brian de palma film requires a certain amount of gratuitous violence , this one is remarkably tame for the man who became famous when he made carrie .
the movie 's outline has some promise , but the movie itself is leaden .
the film takes itself all too seriously .
at best , it is a 1940s - style b movie .
a little humor would have helped the script some , but a complete rewrite would have been better .
and , although i hate to say it , a different director would have been the biggest improvement .
snake eyes runs 1 : 39 .
it is rated r for violence and would be acceptable for teenagers .
Example Output: N

Example Input: *
* * be warned . . .
the following review contains some harsh language
*
* * the blair witch project .
quite possibly the least scariest movie of all time .
if you want to see real terror on the big screen go back and watch any scene with jar jar binks in the phantom menace , because this movie is not scary or even remotely creepy .
my colleague and friend chuck dowling wrote that if less is more , then the blair witch filmmakers must have thought that nothing is more .
and this worked for him .
well , i 'm sorry , but nothing .
. . is nothing ! ! ! ! !
nothing is not more .
it 's nothiiiiiinggggggggggg ! ! ! ! ! ! .
i do not pay 5 dollars to see nothing .
" nothing " is free , available all around the world at a location near you .
i am absolutely in amazement that some people find this movie scary .
i could just discount them and say , " well , i guess they are just pansy
chicken shits who are probably scared of their own shadow .
"
but i have intelligent friends who like this movie
and so that does n't hold water .
there must be some other reason .
( then again , maybe my first thought is correct , i think i 'll try pointing their shadow out to them one day and test their reaction . )
when i hear people praising this film , i never hear them talking about what makes up about 97 % of this movie : three kids bickering with each other about being lost .
they only talk about what might make up possibly 3 to 4 minutes of screen time .
this being a few very short night scenes where the kids hear some unscary sounds and another where they shout " josh ! !
" over and over .
this film should not be called the blair witch project , it should more accurately be called three dumb and pisspoor filmmakers get lost . . . and argue with each other .
oh ladies and gentlemen you will be so scared when you hear them shouting " josh ! !
"
.
and if you thought that was scary , wait till you see a pile of rocks , and then some tinkertoy lincoln logs ,
oh my dear lord you will be pissing in your pants with fear .
oh yeah , and some goo on one of their backpacks .
you 've never seen terror like this folks , and you do n't want to .
the chevy chase / goldie hawn comedy foul play is creepier than this film .
( for current films , i highly recommend the sixth sense or a stir of echoes for a creepy filmgoing experience . )
this film is an example of marketing with no substance .
the marketing was brilliant , and the whole nation is in awe of just the premise for the film .
they want this film to be good .
and i think they are reaching and praising the wrong movie because they do n't have anything else to praise .
that wonderful film that rejuvenates the horror genre may come along , but this is not it .
this film could have been so much better .
just think , if maybe there had been only 10 minutes of arguing about being lost , and 80 minutes of nighttime stuff .
i saw this movie with a girl who was extremely pumped for it .
she was sold on this film .
and then , at one point during it , she turned to me and asked ' . . .
are we supposed to be scared by this ? ' .
i 've heard one opinion that you " have to use your imagination " to create the fear in this movie .
well , i thought that was what the filmmakers were supposed to do .
use their imagination and create a good movie .
i mean anyone can use their imagination and not pay 5 bucks for it .
but even if you like this idea , then what are you imagining ?
an entity called the blair witch ?
some rednecks fucking with these kids ? are either of these things really scary when you think about it ? ? ?
i 've heard several people say that this movie makes them recall how scary it can be to be out in the woods and hear something .
well sure that s scary in real life , but there are a lot of things that are scary in real life that are not scary in a movie nor even interesting .
you could sit in your house and see a snake or a spider and it could be scary , but in a film it would n't be .
and no , a movie does not need a big budget or cgi special effects to be scary or creepy .
actually the less the better ( see the equally awful remake of the haunting ) .
but you have to do something .
you ca nt just count on us all having nostalgic memories of how something like this could be scary , if it were real .
and by the way , about the shakycam filming in blair witch .
are n't these supposed to be " filmmakers " who should know how to point a camera and shoot something without shaking the camera constantly ?
i 'm not even talking about the couple scenes where they are terrified , that 's justified .
i 'm talking about the other 87 minutes of the movie where they ca n't seem to shoot anything smoothly at all .
minor quibble there .
there is a feeling in me that the people that like this movie are suckers .
that the filmmakers are just laughing their asses off all the way to the bank .
and i think there is a good chance they will see this film again and say to themselves " what was i thinking ? ?
" .
but , if they do n't , then that s fine .
if it works for them then that 's okay
i guess .
i just lament that by making this movie a hit , we are going to be subjected to more of the " nothing is more " approach .
pretty soon we 're going to get some movies like this : just a still shot of a prison jail cell .
for 90 minutes .
and we 'll have to use our imagination and think to ourselves , " my god
, would n't it be scary to spend life in prison ? ! !
this movie is the scariest movie of all time ! ! ! ! !
"
.
or , a shot of a coffin , with some funeral directors arguing with each other .
"
man , do you know how scary it would be to die ? ? ? ! ! ! !
now this is the scariest movie of all time ! ! ! !
" [ r ]
Example Output:
N