In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.
--------
Question: Comment: Very likely the republicans were not as careless with their cyber-security. Also, to the extent that the Russians do or don't like Trump; they may be misunderastimating him, much like our home grown politicians.

Answer: Non-threat

Question: Comment: When I said I am not pro-Jewish I also said I wasn't anti-Jewish. I to be "pro" something requires me to want more of it - which I don't because it's not MY decision to make. How many children Jewish people have is entirely THEIR decision and I respect that.

I believe, above all, in live and let live.
But live-and-let-live is a form of tolerance. Tolerance is a peace treaty. I'll let you be whoever the hell you want to be, think whatever you want, believe whatever crazy stuff you want and defend your right to do so.
But like any peace treaty, it can only apply to others who sign onto the same thing. You must agree to do the same for me.

You believe in Jesus ? Good for you. You try to make LAWS to force ME to obey what you say his laws are: we have a problem.
You believe in Allah ? Good for you. You try to interfere in my life because of it - problem.

The vast majority of all people accept the treaty. The minority of fundamentalists do not and get no tolerance.

Answer: Non-threat

Question: Comment: I was placed in a Presbyterian boarding school in Ganado AZ 1n 1955 (6th grade) I look primarily Anglo, but that didn't mean I got any better treatment.

The school decided to have a Navajo Christmas Nativity/play. I was devastated to hear some of my Navajo classmates react with disgust "I'm not going to dress up like a "john" (Similar to Ni**er for a black person) How could some of them turn their back on their heritage, their history and their people??

The Presbyterian teachers at that school were better than most at trying to give us the ability to exist in both worlds. Very little of the "rejection attitude" came from there.

Sixty years later, it is gratifying to note that almost all students from that school became the "Movers & Shakers" in Tribal Gov't and leaders in their communities and professions.

Yes, the abuse in most of the (particularly gov't) "Indian" schools was terrible, and unforgivable - but like many bad situations, there were a few silver linings.

Answer:
Non-threat