Problem: Brad learns his lesson<br>Brad wanted to get drunk for the first time ever. He was throwing a huge party and invited all his friends. They all got drunk as they could. Brad threw up all over the place. He woke up with a massive headache and learned to never drink again.

Based on the paragraph above can we conclude that "Brad was a lonely kid"?

A: It's impossible to say

Problem: They are both already in application internationally; both are advantageous to passengers, shippers and carriers; they allow greater uniformity of the rules governing international air transportation; they will both contribute to lessening the risk of litigation within the aeronautical industry.

Based on the paragraph above can we conclude that "Passengers are advantaged with the implementation of this development, but not as much as shippers and carriers."?

A: It's impossible to say

Problem: Uniformity is not a sine qua non, and this is where Pepin-Robarts in reminding us of the opting in and opting out facilities and raising the compensation in opting out provided the opportunity if there is a spirit of goodwill and of pragmatic compromise for working out arrangements to accommodate the increasing pluralism in our federal society.

Based on the paragraph above can we conclude that "Conformity is not a sine qua non."?

A:
Yes