This is the content of an email: Mr. Lay, I wrote you a few days ago concerned about the news articles describing the amount of money passing to top management during Enron's crisis. This morning I received an e-mail that states you are going to forgo the payment under the Change of Control Provision which amounted to between $60 to $80 million depending on which article you read. I want to commend you on this decision which most likely would not have been made by a lesser man. Your credibility and your personal integrity have both gone up a notch in my estimation. Thank you,

Subject: CHANGE OF CONTROL PROVISION

This is the content of an email: Dear eBill Customer: We're upgrading our eBill program to help serve you better. Your eBill account will be available to view on our new Web site - www.reliant.com/myaccount - beginning with your February bill. We've changed our bill to make it easier for our customers to understand. To introduce you to our new bill format, you will receive a paper copy of your February bill, in addition to receiving it online. You can continue to pay your eBill as you normally would by logging on to our new Web site, www.reliant.com/myaccount. There is no need for you to respond to the paper bill, or to take any other action except to make a note of your new Reliant Energy Residential Services account number for your records. If you pay your eBill using an online bill payment service, such as one offered by your bank, Yahoo, or Quicken Direct Pay, you will need to update your account number information with them to ensure correct processing of your online payment. You will be able to continue to view your eBill information for January 2002 and prior months by logging on to ebill.reliantenergy.com/logon We thank you for your continued use of Reliant Energy eBill. If you have any questions, please contact us toll free at 1-866-222-7100. Sincerely,

Subject: Reliant Energy eBill Update

This is the content of an email: Will - I've passed your phone number along to Bill Williams, the Real Time group manager here in Portland. He should be contacting you shortly to discuss problems with and changes to the Scheduling Activity Report. I've checked with other groups on the floor and found that the report is only used by Real Time, and less frequently by groups assisting Real Time, so I believe Bill or someone in his group could most suitably test the new application. Let me know if there's anything else I can do, and thanks for all your help today. Kate

Subject: Changes to SAR Report

This is the content of an email: Adam, I believe that we have formally responded to all your issues as per your memo to me of August 8, 2000. In all or almost all cases, we have accepted your position. The agreement should look and behave very closely to what you would have signed with the competing utility. In addition, ENA is paying a higher price, sharing credits and have voluntarily increased the term to twelve years from ten. I do not understand what is holding up completing this transaction other than a complete re-trade on the original transaction. I hope this is not the case. The ENA team worked hard to facilitate this transaction for Enron Wind. In fact, we were originally solicited by Enron Wind to help build the merchant wind market and we had to coax Enron Wind to do this transaction with ENA versus TXU. I look forward to finding a solution to this current impasse. Regards
Subject: Indian Mesa