Nunzia Rondanini stated, "Through its aesthetic dimension architecture goes beyond the functional aspects that it has in common with other human sciences. Through its own particular way of expressing values, architecture can stimulate and influence social life without presuming that, in and of itself, it will promote social development.'
If it is possible to answer this question, answer it for me (else, reply "unanswerable"): What shouldn't architecture be assumed to promote, according to Rondanini?
social development