In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Example Input: Comment: Finishing up here, the underlying problem I see is that either through direct coordination with the Clinton campaign (thank you Wikileaks), or through a desire to drive up ratings/profits, the mainstream media has been taking many of Trump's words out of context and intentionally stoking fear and racism across party lines for the past year. At the same time, any stories about HRC's actual racism, like having the young woman removed by security at a press conference when she dared to ask about the "super predator" comment from the 90s, were completely buried. Now that Trump has been elected, the media is going into overdrive to drive people apart. Quick to blame Trump, blame some absurd Russian conspiracy theory, cast al his supporters as racist and ignorant, but dont talk about real policy issues. Dont talk about widespread police abuse, make it about race. Dont talk about widespread poverty, make it about race. Dont talk about lost jobs across the board, make it about race.
Example Output: Non-sexual-explicit

Example Input: Comment: "If the law[judge] supposes that," said Mr. Bumble, ... "the law[judge] is a assa idiot."

* In English literature ass is a donkey and should not be censored!
Example Output: Sexual-explicit

Example Input: Comment: To be honest I did not watch any of it however the little bit I read certainly does not put Comey in a good light.
1. Getting a friend to leak the memos to the NYT and stating he no longer has a copy himself, wtf.
2. Being bullied by DOJ Loretta Lynch, getting him to refer to the Clinton email server investigation last year as a "matter" and not as an investigation. Besides these two points nothing else was new from what I can make out.
You obviously have no understanding how Bookies operate. Bookies seldom if ever loose no matter the odds they work on percentage of turnover nothing more, go do some research. If your reasoning is true that they are good at predicting odds, Paddy's and Ladbrooks would have been out of business after Brexit and Trumps win.
Example Output:
Non-sexual-explicit