In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Ex Input:
Comment: Essentially he was a no show, if compared to how other presidents had participated. And I believe that at one of the prayer breakfasts he insulted Christians, did he not? Can you do better than that example? Something in the Denver Post, for example.

Ex Output:
Non-obscene

Ex Input:
Comment: I agree with you that surprise about what that man is doing is more than disingenuous. It's actually offensive, given that 60% of white Catholics voted for him, with the backing of most of the hierarchy. However, Maureen Fiedler was never a Trump supporter. And, please don't give up on immigration. There are many of us who are working to hold to as much of the law as possible. We need as much support as possible from everyone.

Ex Output:
Non-obscene

Ex Input:
Comment: I am not a Trump fan. In my view he ranges from properly characterized as a bad joke to an abomination. Nevertheless, I hope the new leaders of the Daily Dispatch dispense with type of opinion piece. Frankly, even if I largely agree with her, I don't care what Jennifer Rubin thinks. The only people I want to hear from are Alaskans. I care naught what Cal Thomas, or Christine Flowers or Leonard Pitts or Michael Gerson have to say. Or any of the rest of them. I like to read Paul Jenkins and Shannyn Moore and all manner of local folks.

Ex Output:
Non-obscene