Here is an email: MRyanTaber@nyiso.com writes to the NYISO_TECH_EXCHANGE Discussion List: Dear MSWG Members. A meeting of the Market Structure Working Group has been scheduled for Monday, August 27, 2001 from 10:00 - 4:00 at the NYS Nurses Association, 11 Cornell Road, Latham, NY. Agenda and meeting materials will be sent at a later date.
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: NYISO Market Structure Working Group Meeting, August 27, 2001
Q: All: Do you need any of the ISDA "boilerplate" language ( the ISDA Master Agreement and the ISDA Credit Support Annex) to attach to the draft Schedules/Paragraph 13 which we prepare to send to our counterparties? We do not have the "boilerplate" in a word document. Also, is there anything that Houston legal can do to facilitate your transactions?
Propose a subject line
A: ISDA Master Agreements
IN: Here are the two bills of sale for the Intergen transaction. The only change to the form was the insertion of the date. The CA II bill also reflects the sale of the transformer.

Generate a subject line.

OUT: CA I and II Bills of Sale
IN: This is an email
Colleagues: Utility Risk management positions as of October are now available at the following level of details: 1) The position by Utility 2) The position by Customer from a given utility. 2) The position by State 3) The position by NERC region 4) The Aggregates of the above per State, NERC Region, and Customer. If you need any position for a specific utility in your service territory, please contact me, and I will be happy to provide you with the information within the same business day. Thank you,

What is the subject?

OUT: URM Positions for OCT.
QUESTION: At the meeting yesterday, SoCalGas outlined their plan for implementing the unbundling of their backbone system including a proposed timeline which will be filed at the CPUC on Jan. 17, 2002. Lad Lorenz state that the proposal is "not cast in concrete" and invited comments at the meeting as well as in response to the filing. However as you might expect, when some customers expressed their concern with the timeline being too short, SoCal made no offer to push some of the dates out into the future and stuck with their proposal. All of the proposed dates are their best estimate for timing as variables such as the system requirements may cause delays and rescheduling of some portions of the implementation plan. Key items and dates are as follows: Jan. 17 SoCalGas files its proposed Implementation Plan and timeline. Feb. 14 Meeting with CPUC Energy Staff and Interested Parties. Tariff Workshop. Feb. 22 SoCalGas files tariffs including a definition of Annual Average Usage for existing end-use customers. This definition is important as it determines their capacity rights in the Open Season. Mar. 15 50 mmcf/d of capacity at North Needles to be placed into service. May 6 Distribution of informational packages on Backbone Receipt Point Rights to customers. May 29 Begin Phase I of the Open Season. June 5 Phase I Open Season ends. See Slides 55 through 57 for all other Open Season dates. June 22 SoCal will post awarded receipt point capacity. July 1 Implementation of unbundling the backbone receipt point services. Slide 13 Indicates North Needles has 800 mmcf/d of capacity This was described as "primarily Transwestern" Slide 15 The Core backbone receipt point capacity at Needles is set at 313 mmcf/d. I'm faxing an entire copy of the presentation to Marketing and Regulatory Affairs for distribution and review. Slides 11-21 describe the Backbone Receipt Services and Slides 50-63 provide the proposed timeline for implementation. Please give me a call if you have any questions about SoCal's proposal. gh
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: Summary of SoCalGas Unbundling Customer Meeting
IN: Staci, Attached is the final draft of the petition we are jointly filing with Gulf Power Company. The plan is to file it tomorrow in Tallahassee. I will get with you shortly on finalizing the CSA amendments.

Generate a subject line.

OUT:
Florida PSC Petition