Question:
Based on the premise "Yet he was still alive!", can we conclude that "He was already dead."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
no

Question: Sentence A: It is more expensive than the run-of-the-mill Century line of car seats (a Britax runs above $200), but it is made of material so hard it would crack your knee if you walked into it, and its belting system is far more encompassing and elaborate than the average car seat's.

Sentence B: The quality of this car seat is superior, hence it's a bit more expensive than others.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Question: While the Chinese continued to enjoy their daily rice, the British, eating their daily bread, were dropping like flies.
The Chinese remained healthy because of the benefits of rice.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Problem: Here is a premise:
, about $100 if I use Strathmore, a competing paper, which is only 25 percent cotton rag.

Here is a hypothesis:
Strathmore is cheaper but not as good quality.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Sentence 1: It is said that one of the conditions of her bequest to the National Trust was that Herdwick sheep must always be bred on her farms.

Sentence 2: She made a bequest to the National Trust.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: yes

Premise:
"Must be Mike Gerson."
Hypothesis: There's zero evidence that it's Mike Gerson.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
no