Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.

Let me give you an example: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
The answer to this example can be: Yes
Here is why: The comment suggests threat against Trump and his agendas and classified as threatening. Hence, it is a positive example

OK. solve this:
So what has the Alaskan Department of Fish and Game Commissioner gained from the death of this last male (who has a pregnant female waiting in the wings)? Nothing I would assume expect the possible extinction of a particular line of wolf which 1000s of people will no longer visit Alaska to see. Since when does a National Park allow "thugs" (posing as hunters) to come into its park and kill animals - animals by the sounds of it that are moving towards extinction. Even if these animals were in excess surely it's the responsibility of the parks board to sort it out and not leave it's borders open to hunters to sort out for them because hunters don't know how to discriminate between what needs to be culled vs what needs to be retained. You're despicable MR COTTEN. If YOU have the authority, close the park for the next few years so the wolves can recover - not just for an extra month a year -
and do it immediately.
Answer:
Yes