Here is a premise:
At the Yale Law School Lowenstein International Human Rights Clinic, she codirected a litigation effort on behalf of Haitian refugees in federal challenge to the United States interdiction program, which included testifying before the U.S.

Here is a hypothesis:
Testifying for the US is crucial for determining a group's validity.

Is it possible to conclude that if the premise is true, then so is the hypothesis?
it is not possible to tell