In this task, you are given text for US Congressional and California state bills, your task is to generate a summary for this bill.
Example: SECTION 1. LIABILITY OF BUSINESS ENTITIES PROVIDING USE OF FACILITIES
TO NONPROFIT ORGANIZATIONS.

(a) Definitions.--In this section:
(1) Business entity.--The term ''business entity'' means a
firm, corporation, association, partnership, consortium, joint
venture, or other form of enterprise.
(2) Facility.--The term ''facility'' means any real
property, including any building, improvement, or appurtenance.
(3) Gross negligence.--The term ''gross negligence'' means
voluntary and conscious conduct by a person with knowledge (at
the time of the conduct) that the conduct is likely to be
harmful to the health or well-being of another person.
(4) Intentional misconduct.--The term ''intentional
misconduct'' means conduct by a person with knowledge (at the
time of the conduct) that the conduct is harmful to the health
or well-being of another person.
(5) Nonprofit organization.--The term ''nonprofit
organization'' means--
(A) any organization described in section 501(c)(3)
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and exempt from
tax under section 501(a) of such Code; or
(B) any not-for-profit organization organized and
conducted for public benefit and operated primarily for
charitable, civic, educational, religious, welfare, or
health purposes.
(6) State.--The term ''State'' means each of the several
States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto
Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, the Northern
Mariana Islands, any other territory or possession of the
United States, or any political subdivision of any such State,
territory, or possession.
(b) Limitation on Liability.--
(1) In general.--Subject to subsection (c), a business
entity shall not be subject to civil liability relating to any
injury or death occurring at a facility of the business entity
in connection with a use of such facility by a nonprofit
organization if--
(A) the use occurs outside of the scope of business
of the business entity;
(B) such injury or death occurs during a period
that such facility is used by the nonprofit
organization; and
(C) the business entity authorized the use of such
facility by the nonprofit organization.
(2) Application.--This subsection shall apply--
(A) with respect to civil liability under Federal
and State law; and
(B) regardless of whether a nonprofit organization
pays for the use of a facility.
(c) Exception for Liability.--Subsection (b) shall not apply to an
injury or death that results from an act or omission of a business
entity that constitutes gross negligence or intentional misconduct,
including any misconduct that--
(1) constitutes a crime of violence (as that term is
defined in section 16 of title 18, United States Code) or act
of international terrorism (as that term is defined in section
2331 of title 18) for which the defendant has been convicted in
any court;
(2) constitutes a hate crime (as that term is used in the
Hate Crime Statistics Act (28 U.S.C. 534 note));
(3) involves a sexual offense, as defined by applicable
State law, for which the defendant has been convicted in any
court; or
(4) involves misconduct for which the defendant has been
found to have violated a Federal or State civil rights law.
(d) Superseding Provision.--
(1) In general.--Subject to paragraph (2) and subsection
(e), this Act preempts the laws of any State to the extent that
such laws are inconsistent with this Act, except that this Act
shall not preempt any State law that provides additional
protection from liability for a business entity for an injury
or death with respect to which conditions under subparagraphs
(A) through (C) of subsection (b)(1) apply.
(2) Limitation.--Nothing in this Act shall be construed to
supersede any Federal or State health or safety law.
(e) Election of State Regarding Nonapplicability.--This Act shall
not apply to any civil action in a State court against a business
entity in which all parties are citizens of the State if such State
enacts a statute--
(1) citing the authority of this subsection;
(2) declaring the election of such State that this Act
shall not apply to such civil action in the State; and
(3) containing no other provision.
Example solution: Shields a business entity from civil liability relating to any injury or death occurring at a facility of that entity in connection with a use of such facility by a nonprofit organization if: (1) the use occurs outside the scope of business of the business entity; (2) such injury or death occurs during a period that such facility is used by such organization; and (3) the business entity authorized the use of such facility by the organization.
Makes this Act inapplicable to an injury or death that results from an act or omission of a business entity that constitutes gross negligence or intentional misconduct, including misconduct that: (1) constitutes a hate crime or a crime of violence or act of international terrorism for which the defendant has been convicted in any court; or (2) involves a sexual offense for which the defendant has been convicted in any court or misconduct for which the defendant has been found to have violated a Federal or State civil rights law.
Preempts State laws to the extent that such laws are inconsistent with this Act, except State law that provides additional protection from liability. Specifies that this Act shall not be construed to supersede any Federal or State health or safety law.
Makes this Act inapplicable to any civil action in a State court against a business entity in which all parties are citizens of the State if such State, citing this Act's authority and containing no other provision, enacts a statute declaring the State's election that this Act shall not apply to such action in the State.
Example explanation: This Bill focuses on shielding business entities from civil liability relating to an injury or death depending on the conditions of injury, hence the generated summary is correct.

Problem: SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ''Accountability in Rulemaking Act''.

SEC. 2. REGULATORY REVIEW TRANSPARENCY.

(a) Unified Regulatory Agenda.--
(1) Establishment.--Not later than December 31, March 31,
June 30, and September 30, of each year, the head of each
agency shall submit to the Administrator of the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs a unified regulatory agenda.
The Administrator shall make each unified regulatory agenda
available on a public website in an accessible format.
(2) Contents.--The unified regulatory agenda shall contain
a list of each regulation under development or review by the
agency. Each entry for a regulation shall include, at a
minimum, the following:
(A) A regulation identifier number.
(B) A brief summary of the regulation.
(C) The legal authority for the regulation.
(D) A statement of whether the Administrator has
declared the regulation a significant regulatory
action.
(E) The stage in the process of issuing the
regulation.
(F) A statement of whether the regulation has been
submitted to the Administrator for review.
(G) Any legal deadline for the regulation,
including the Public Law number of the statute that
mandates such a deadline.
(H) Any written communication between an employee
or officer of the agency and an employee or officer of
the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs
regarding the regulation.
(I) Any communication received from the
Administrator regarding the regulation describing why
further consideration of the regulation is necessary.
(3) Guidance.--Not later than 6 months after the date of
the enactment of this Act, the Administrator shall review
agency compliance with the provisions of this subsection and
provide recommendations to bring any noncompliant agency into
compliance.
(b) Significant Regulatory Action Review.--
(1) In general.--Not later than 90 days after the date on
which the unified regulatory agenda is submitted under
subsection (a)(1), the Administrator shall review each
significant regulatory action listed in the agenda to ensure
each action is consistent with applicable law.
(2) Extension of review period.--The deadline for review
described in paragraph (1) may be extended--
(A) once by not more than 30 days upon written
approval of the Director of the Office of Management
and Budget; and
(B) at the request of the head of the issuing
agency.
(3) Documentation of extension.--The Administrator shall
provide written documentation of the reasoning for any
extension of review of a regulation made under paragraph (3)
and include such documentation in the unified regulatory agenda
listing for the regulation.
(4) Third-party communication.--During any review process
of a significant regulatory action described in this
subsection--
(A) an employee or officer of the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs may not meet with an
individual who is not a Federal employee or officer
regarding the substance of such action unless a
representative from the issuing agency has been
invited;
(B) within 10 working days of receipt of any
written communication regarding the substance of such
action from an individual who is not a Federal employee
or officer, the Administrator shall provide such
communication to the issuing agency; and
(C) within 10 working days of any oral
communication regarding the substance of such action
with an individual who is not a Federal employee or
officer, the Administrator shall provide the date and
the name or names of individuals involved in such
communication to the issuing agency.
(5) Documentation of changes.--
(A) Office of information and regulatory affairs
changes.--The Administrator shall document any change
made by the Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs to a significant regulatory action during the
review process under this subsection and make such
change available on a public website in a redline or
other easily understood format.
(B) Agency changes.--After the Administrator has
reviewed a significant regulatory action under this
subsection, the head of an agency shall document any
change made by the agency to the regulation and make
such change available on a public website in a redline
or other easily understood format.
(6) Return letter.--For each significant regulatory action
that the Administrator returns to an agency for further
consideration of any provision, the Administrator shall provide
the issuing agency with a written explanation of why further
consideration is necessary.
(c) Agency Removal of a Regulation.--With regard to any proposed
regulation that was listed and subsequently removed from a unified
regulatory agenda, the head of the agency shall publish a written
explanation for such removal on a publicly available website.
(d) Definitions.--In this section:
(1) Administrator.--The term ''Administrator'' means the
Administrator of the Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs.
(2) Agency.--The term ''agency'' has the meaning given that
term in section 3502 of title 44, United States Code, but does
not include an independent regulatory agency as that term is
defined in such section.
(3) Regulation.--The term ''regulation''--
(A) means an agency statement of general
applicability and future effect, which the agency
intends to have the force and effect of law, that is
designed to implement, interpret, or prescribe law or
policy or to describe the procedure or practice
requirements of an agency; and
(B) does not include--
(i) regulations issued in accordance with
the formal rulemaking provisions of sections
556 and 557 of title 5, United States Code;
(ii) regulations that pertain to a military
or foreign affairs function of the United
States, other than procurement regulations and
regulations involving the import or export of
non-defense articles and services; and
(iii) regulations that are limited to an
agency organization, management, or personnel
matters.
(4) Regulatory action.--The term ''regulatory action''
means any substantive action by an agency normally published in
the Federal Register that promulgates or is expected to lead to
the promulgation of a final regulation, including notices of
inquiry, advance notices of proposed rulemaking, and notices of
proposed rulemaking.
(5) Significant regulatory action.--The term ''significant
regulatory action'' means any regulatory action that is likely
to result in a regulation that may--
(A) have an annual effect on the economy of
$167,000,000 or more, adjusted annually for inflation
to reflect the change in the Consumer Price Index for
All Urban Consumers published by the Bureau of Labor
Statistics, rounding to the nearest $1,000,000;
(B) adversely affect in a material way the economy,
a sector of the economy, productivity, competition,
jobs, the environment, public health or safety, or
State, local, or tribal governments or communities;
(C) create a serious inconsistency or otherwise
interfere with an action taken or planned by another
agency;
(D) materially alter the budgetary impact of
entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan programs or
the rights and obligations of recipients therein; or
(E) raise novel legal or policy issues arising out
of legal mandates.
Solution: Accountability in Rulemaking Act This bill requires each federal agency to submit to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA), by December 31, March 31, June 30, and September 30 of each year, a unified regulatory agenda listing each regulation under development or review by such agency. The agenda shall include a brief summary of, and the legal authority for, such regulation and a statement of whether the OIRA has declared the regulation to be a significant regulatory action. A "significant regulatory action" is defined as any regulatory action that is likely to result in a regulation that may: have an annual effect on the economy of $167 million or more; adversely affect in a material way the economy, a sector of the economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, public health or safety, or state, local, or tribal governments or communities; create a serious inconsistency or otherwise interfere with an action of another agency; materially alter the budgetary impact of entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan programs or the rights and obligations of recipients; or raise novel legal or policy issues arising out of legal mandates. The OIRA shall: (1) make each such agenda available on a public website, and (2) review each significant regulatory action listed within 90 days of its submission to ensure such action is consistent with applicable law. The bill sets forth limitations on third-party communication during the review process. The OIRA shall: (1) document any change made by it to a significant regulatory action during the review process and make such change available on a public website; and (2) for each such action the OIRA returns to an agency for further consideration, it shall provide a written explanation of why further consideration is necessary.