I believe I entered all the purchases New Power made for January 2001. Deal Volume Comment 551050 14824 Purch from EES at A3, Maumee 551052 2374 Purch from EES at AO6 551053 1600 Purch from ENA at A06 551056 4000 Purch from EOG at Broad Run 551058 3674 Purch from EES at Delmont, the deal ticket is at the wrong meter number. I sent a request for a new meter to Global facilities. Whew, I think thats it. Deal 551058 will need to fixed next week. I'll do if I remember.
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: Other New Power deals
ttached are the revenues and the volumes per counterparty that you requested. Please note that the revenue and OPM cost information is in Canadian dollars. I will be forwarding a copy of our MSA Agreement template shortly. Please call me once you've had a chance to review the information.
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: Calgary outsourcing information
Randy: As I mentioned in my voice mail to you, we have accepted the CSP language with the October 2002 date and with my other modifications which Susan sent to you yesterday. With respect to the Guaranty, the last draft that I saw had a termination date of June 30, 2001. Just want to make sure taht whatever is signed has a different termination date (i.e. June 30, 2002). Again, before we release our Guaranty I would like to see the final version of your Guaranty. Thanks.
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: Status
Looks like we have an issue with RisktRAC access. In order to be able to set up books in RisktRAC, the only role that currently exists is the Risk Controls group, who has access to all books, hierarchies etc (all groups, all commodities). With NetCo coming on line, the Risk Controls group has been asked to approve RisktRAC access to the new NetCo controls group so they can set up the new gas books that have been requested. I am uncomfortable granting access to NetCo personnel, as they would be able to see all the estate info, including Europe, EIM, EGM, ENA etc. Also, it is my understanding that the IT groups are working on splitting out the systems but will not be able to do so until after these books have to be set up (deadline for them is next Monday). As such, I recommend the following: In order to ensure there is a segration between NetCo and the estate, until the systems are segregated, the IT groups should be responsible for setting up books, curves etc. How does that sound? Thanks
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer:
NETCO access to RisktRAC