QUESTION: As an Enron employee who is a member of the United Way Young Leaders, please join other young leaders throughout Houston for a celebration on October 10. The attached invitation provides all the details. With Enron having the second largest campaign in Houston raising a total of $6 million dollars with the corporate match, it would be great if we could have Enron represented in a big way. The RSVP deadline has been extended to Monday, October 8, so if you pland to attend, please send a response to youngleaders@uwtgc.org or call 713/685-2306. Thank you and we look forward to seeing you there.
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: United Way Young Leaders
Jim and Gary, I would change the $64 million to $45.6 million for Rate & Currency. The $45.6 is after consideration of the collateral posted for GSCM. I have not included CIBS and J. Aaron which will require more time because it includes trading positions from several other Enron groups and significant collateral has been posted. If you do want to include, I would list as 3.3 using a pro-rata spread of the collateral and list separately as harder to get. We have other positive position where Enron is net negative or more collateral has been posted (e.g JPM). The Broker Deposit number for Equity Trading should be removed. We only have about 160,000 left to get back currently. Sheila $ in millions Rate & Currency MTM and Net A/R and A/P Net Goldman Capital Makets 34.8 17.2 collateral; 50% attibuted to R&C; 50% to weather 26.3 RBC 14.2 14.2 SEB 4.2 4.2 WLB 0.9 0.9 Subtotal 54.1 45.6 CIBC 2.0 collateral posted 9.9 Total Enron postion Est. 37.5 J. Aaron 4.8 collateral posted 11.2 Total Enron postion Est. 17.9 Subtotal 6.8 Postive R&C total with Positive Enron Total 60.9
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: Rate & Currency $45.6 million
Taffy: Sara and I have some swap legal issues that we would like to discuss with Mark. We probably need about 1 hour. Can you find a time that works for all 3 of us, if possible this week, but if not, as soon as possible next week? Thanks.
Answer: Meeting With Mark
Here is an email: Jeff: Thanks again for all of your time and consideration with respect to our con= sideration of Norm Pedersen to join our Firm in Los Angeles. I just wanted= to let you know that we decided it probably did not make sense to pursue t= hings further with Norm. After drilling down even further, it just seemed = like we were going to run into major conflict problems down the road based = upon the CA regulatory proceedings that likely are going to arise and the n= ature of Norm's historical client base. It also would not have been fair t= o Norm to have him join the Firm and then be conflicted out of work that he= had planned to pursue at the Firm. I can't tell you how much I appreciate= your candor as well as your open-mindedness in helping me evaluate the sit= uation. I really felt bad bothering you with this, but I knew you would ha= ve the best insights into the likely direction of the regulatory proceeding= s in CA and I wanted to make sure that I was being fair in evaluating Norm'= s situation and in a position to make a decision based on all of the releva= nt facts. I also want to emphasize emphatically (if it is possible to use = those words together!) that I do not want you to think or feel that you "ni= xed" Norm or anything along those lines; indeed, I feel quite the opposite.= In addition, from the outset, after first talking to Norm and getting a s= ense for the types of business he has been handling and the issues he has b= een pursuing on behalf of his clients, I had felt it was really a non-start= er since the last thing I wanted to do was to have LeBoeuf on the other sid= e from Enron in important regulatory proceedings for the company. It is on= e thing to receive a waiver to represent another company in a negotiated co= mmercial transaction in which Enron is relying on another law firm, but I c= ould not see us pressing a regulatory agenda directly adverse to Enron's in= terests in a proceeding in which Enron was a major participant and which we= knew going into the proceedings at the start that our representation would= be adverse to Enron. As Rick may have told you, there have been some situations where we have be= en adverse to the Company or at least representing clients that did not see= "eye to eye" with Enron on all of the issues. These generally have been s= ituations involving historical client relationships that go back decades wh= ere Enron has itself been using Bracewell, for example, and Rick has been i= ncredibly gracious and understanding in not conflicting us out of those pro= ceedings. Nonetheless, I am trying to do whatever I can to try to eliminat= e or reduce the number of those situations on a going forward basis, althou= gh I know I will not be able to eliminate all of them in light of the size = of our Firm and the diverse nature of its client base. Jeff, I will follow up with you personally, but I just wanted to drop you a= quick note to thank you for the time and thought you devoted to this. I'=
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: Follow up
Q: Paul I am now working at Dubai office and ready. If there is no CoU agreement for Dabhol, should we go ahead and start generating one. Pl advise. Regards
Propose a subject line
A: moved
Here is an email: John, How do you want me to handle pmt back to Greg for your return leg on Travel Air from the Super Bowl. Greg mentioned that Enron may be picking up the bill for you. If yes, just advise and I'll do up the payment request. The total charges are $3,621.50. Many Thanks, Liz
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A:
Flight back from Super Bowl