Question: New Delhi (CNN) -- A lawyer who says he's representing three of the five men charged with raping and fatally beating a woman on a New Delhi bus said Tuesday that he has advised his clients to plead not guilty.

"So far they have agreed to my advice, but a clearer picture will emerge by tomorrow evening," the attorney, Manohar Lal Sharma, told CNN. "I fear they might come under pressure to change their mind."

Sharma said one of those he is representing is Ram Singh, the main accused in the case. The other two are Mukesh Singh and Akshay Thakur, he said.

The horrific attack on the 23-year-old woman in New Delhi on December 16 has prompted angry protests over the country's treatment of women and handling of sexual attacks. India's interior minister has said he was also working with security officials to strengthen laws regarding rape and assault following the attack, which also stirred outrage worldwide.

Proceedings against the five adult suspects began Monday, when a New Delhi judge ordered the trial closed after tempers flared inside the packed courtroom. Some lawyers loudly criticized colleagues for offering to represent the suspects, with one young lawyer shouting at Sharma, "You will not defend those barbarians."

The magistrate, Namrita Aggarwal, ordered that the hearing take place behind closed doors and barred news outlets from publishing proceedings related to the case without the court's permission, citing concerns about the suspects' safety.

The five men in court this week are charged with murder, rape and kidnapping, and could be sentenced to death if convicted. A juvenile court will take up the matter of determining the age of a sixth suspect, who claims to be 17 and therefore not old enough to be tried as an adult, CNN affiliate IBN reported. 1. Who is Sharma representing?
2. how many suspects are there total?
3. what does Manohar Lal Sharma do for work?
4. is the trial open or closed?
5. how many of the suspects is Sharma representing?
6. what is one of the charges the men face?
7. what other charges do they face?
8. were news outlets allowed in court?
9. who barred them?
10. what is the name of the magistrate?
11. where was the woman fatally beaten?
12. how old was she?
13. how did the clients plead?
14. when did the attack take place?
15. when did proceedings begin?
16. Is a juvenile also charged?
17. how old does he claim to be?
18. how many suspects are there including him?
19. who reported the story?
20. are they an affiliate of CNN? Provide a numbered list of answers.
****
A numbered of answers: 1. Ram Singh, Mukesh Singh, and Akshay Thakur.
2. five
3. He's an attorney.
4. Closed.
5. Three
6. Raping.
7. Fatally beating a woman.
8. No.
9. The magistrate.
10. Namrita Aggarwal
11. On a New Delhi bus.
12. 23
13. Not guilty.
14. December 16
15. Monday
16. Possibly.
17. 17
18. Six
19. IBN.
20. Yes.

Question: (CNN) -- The week started with all focus on golf's latest child prodigy, but it has ended with a former wonder kid finally fulfilling her great promise.

Michelle Wie claimed her first major title Sunday, winning the U.S. Women's Open at her 11th attempt.

Now 24, she triumphed by two shots from fellow American, Stacy Lewis, holding her nerve as the world No. 1 made a final-round charge.

"Oh my God, I can't believe this is happening," an ecstatic Wie was quoted as saying by the PGA website in the aftermath of her victory.

"Obviously, there are moments of doubt in there," she continued, referring to the prospect that she might never win a major."(But) I had so many people surrounding me. They never lost faith in me. That's pushed me forward."

This mental fortitude was on display as Wie overcame a double-bogey at the 16th hole, bouncing back with a birdie at the next and closing with a par to sign for a level 70.

Lewis also dropped a shot at 16, but finished with two birdies to card a four-under-par 66 that left her level for the tournament.

She finished one ahead of Northern Ireland's 22-year-old Stephanie Meadow, who birdied her last hole to take third place in her professional debut ahead of South Korea's Amy Yang.

Most of the talk at the start of the tournament, which was played at Pinehurst -- also host of the men's equivalent the previous week -- was on 11-year-old Lucy Li.

The American was the youngest qualifier to start the event, but missed the halfway cut after carding two rounds of 78, though she impressed many with her mature attitude. 1. Where was the U.S. Women's Open played?
2. Who won?
3. Was it her first try?
4. How many times had she tried?
5. How old is she?
6. How many other major titles did she win?
7. What kind of kid was she?
8. Who came in second?
9. How much did she win by?
10. How did she feel?
11. Did she ever doubt herself?
12. Who placed third?
13. Where is she from?
14. How old is she
15. Is this her first time in a professional match?
16. Who placed fourth?
17. Was there a child in the game?
18. who?
19. Where is she from?
20. How old is she? Provide a numbered list of answers.
****
A numbered of answers: 1. Pinehurst
2. Michelle Wie
3. no
4. 11
5. 24
6. One
7. wonder kid
8. Amy Yang
9. four-under-par 66
10. ecstatic
11. yes
12. tephanie Meadow
13. Northern Ireland
14. 22
15. yes
16. no one
17. yes
18. Lucy Li
19. America
20. 11

Question: Marietta, Georgia (CNN) -- Whether the prosecution will seek the death penalty in Justin Ross Harris hot-car death case will be decided in two to three weeks, Cobb County District Attorney Vic Reynolds said Thursday.

Reynolds' statement came hours after the Georgia father was indicted by a grand jury on eight counts, including malice murder and two counts of felony murder.

"We're pleased with the pace and thoroughness of this investigation, which continues on today," Reynolds said. "The evidence in this case has led us to this point today. Whether it leads us to anyone else remains to be answered."

The next step will be to put Harris' case on Superior Court Judge Mary Staley's arraignment calendar, which should happen within three weeks, the prosecutor said. Motions will then be filed before the case goes to a trial calendar.

Reynolds declined to take questions or comment further, saying, "This case will be tried in a court of law," and not in the media.

If Reynolds seeks the death penalty, it will be for the malice murder charge, which alleges that Harris, who has claimed his son's death was an accident, premeditated the child's killing.

Harris' attorney, H. Maddox Kilgore, called the charges excessive, describing them as a part of the "state's maze of theories."

"It was always an accident. When the time comes, and we've worked through the state's maze of theories at trial, it's still going to be a terrible, gut-wrenching accident. And all the eccentricities and moral failings of Ross' life isn't going to change that," he told reporters. 1. Who is the prosecutor?
2. Who is the defendant?
3. The defendant's attorney?
4. Who will be presiding over the case?
5. What is her position?
6. Who is the victim?
7. Where is this taking place?
8. What state?
9. Is Reynolds happy with the quality of the findings?
10. What is Harris accused of?
11. Is the death penalty being sought?
12. What did Kilgore say about the case?
13. What does he say about the murder accusations? Provide a numbered list of answers.
****
A numbered of answers:
1. Vic Reynolds
2. Justin Ross Harris
3. H. Maddox Kilgore
4. Judge Mary Staley
5. Superior Court Judge
6. Harris' son
7. Cobb County
8. Georgia
9. Yes
10. malice murder
11. Yes
12. It was always an accident.
13. excessive