In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: toxic and non-toxic. Toxicity is defiend as anything that is rude, disrespectful, or unreasonable that would make someone want to leave a converation.
--------
Question: Comment: Mr. Pai is full of crap.

Answer: Toxic

Question: Comment: Stupid and preventable, and just more evidence of incompetence in the Honolulu Prosecuting Attorney's office.

Answer: Toxic

Question: Comment: You best review your statements, John. Immediately. And reexamine that misguided criterion of yours - for it is sadly lacking.

I have NEVER said the Magesterium never changed a teaching. Prove it - or apologize. I never mentioned Pius IX. Yet ANOTHER "mistake" on your part.

I NEVER "condemned" the official of the Knights of Malta to Hell - what on God's green earth are you talking about? I didn't mention it at all.

I have NEVER said anyone is going to hell. That's not my determination to make.

HOW DARE you claim I have a lack of "Christian love" when absolutely EVERYTHING you have posted here today is false?

WHAT are you smoking today?? I honestly think you need some help, John.

Let's see if your statement to Trid is honest - you know. The one where you state that if you make a mistake you acknowledge it. I fully expect your apology....and an admission that you have maligned me unjustly.

Answer:
Non-toxic