IN: This is an email
Clint, Here it is, i'll start on this when i get back. i may be able to finish it by friday evening, but if you want to help me out, that would be great!!!! Valerie

What is the subject?

OUT: customer info
QUESTION: In its preliminary notice of November maintenance, El Paso had scheduled Lines 1300 and 1301 on the San Juan Crossover for total shutdown Nov. 29-30. It said Wednesday the shutdown has been delayed to coincide with the Dec. 1-2 weekend, when all 650 MMcf/d of the crossover's capacity will be cut to zero. Portions of Line 1300 will be shutting down Dec. 11-12 and Dec. 18-19; capacity cuts then will be 60 MMcf/d.
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: El Paso Maintenance on Lines 1300 and 1301 on San Juan Crossover
Here are revised templates for the adoption by ERMT of the Power and Gas Masters. Note that adopted gas masters should provide for two-way payments. Please provide any comments to these templates to Steve as soon as possible, particularly with respect to the new paragraphs 3 and 4.
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: ERMT Templates Power and Gas
You may have seen recent media reports on the topics of possible EPA action= on New Source Review (NSR) regulation and multipollutant legislation, so I= wanted to summarize some of the important current developments: New Source Review: EPA was asked to conduct a 90-day review of NSR and come up with recommenda= tions for the larger Bush National Energy Plan. EPA held several public h= earings and solicited public comments, which closed July 27. Enron submit= ted comments (which I sent by e-mail on 7/30/01). EPA has indicated that = it will report to the President only on "impacts of NSR on the power sector= " on August 17 and delay any specific recommendations for NSR reform until = mid-September. Stories in the past few days have suggested that EPA's findings will "ease = emissions standards" on coal utilities. Such characterizations are somewhat= slanted, as they are based on information coming from environmental groups= who oppose any NSR reform -- but there is some substantive merit behind th=
Answer: New Source Review & Multipollutant Update
Here is an email: On tuesday of this week after EOTT's staff meeting, I was made aware of a potential environmental estimate problem (too big). I am looking at ways of potentially dealing with the problem so that Lawrence will feel comfortable not booking a reserve in the 3rd qtr, which may have consequences on the plans we have underway to recapitalize the entity. This means coming up with an answer very quickly. There are a number of potential alternatives and I am sure there are more than I will attempt to lay out here. 1) We could simply make a contribution to EOTT for the sole purpose of environmental cleanup, and if unused will be returned. Seems like an expense item, but doable. 2) We could provide an insurance policy to EOTT to provide for environmental expenses in excess of the existing policy, for a fee. Better expense treatment (we get to manage the reserve) and appears to cover the EOTT issue. Because this is an affiliated deal, I guess it would have to go through the audit committee. Potentially the captive could be used. 3) Provide an accounting answer that might give EOTT a one-time gain to offset the one time reserve set-up. i.e., there is a least an argument that the recapitalization proposed will result in the extinguishment of a portion of the debt on the books represented by the API's. Since we are getting a conversion of less than a dollar for dollar deal, this should be doable. For Lawrence: Jim Bouillion has indicated that the insurance proposal may have merit, and so I will need some input from you regarding the coverage that exists now and what we would want going forward. If you want us to talk directly with Susan, we will. I am thinking that you are getting a quote for increasing the cap on the existing policy and that we could give you the same deal, or maybe even slightly better, to satisfy the audit committee. I am obviously looking for any help that I can get here, so if there any more ideas I would like to hear them. If you have questions, feel free to ask. Stan is aware of what we are discussing. 1) and 3) were his requests to review.
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: EOTT Issue
QUESTION: Becky, This will confirm our conversation. You will make the redrafting changes necessary on the petition and attachments to file in Harris County court, and have everything ready for us to file on Monday. Once service is ready, we will then serve the Secretary of State of Texas (I may go ahead and have a process server do that for us, to prevent any questions about proper service later on). Keep your fingers crossed and let's hope that Sherwood Purnell doesn't try to dodge the Secretary of State. Many thanks. Britt P.S.--Lee, we already have the check cut to pay for filing, etc., but get with Becky today and take a look, just to make sure it appears to be in the proper amount. If it is not, let's order a check in the right amount today. Thanks.
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS:
ENA v. Triad