Q: The 199899 season was undoubtedly one of the best seasons in Olympiacos history. They won the 199899 Alpha Ethniki quite convincingly, with ten points difference from AEK and 11 from third-placed Panathinaikos, and also celebrated the domestic Double (association football), bringing home the 199899 Greek Cup after a convincing 20 win against arch-rivals Panathinaikos in the final (Dimitris Mavrogenidis 54, Peter Ofori-Quaye 90), despite the fact that they played for more than 60 minutes in the game with ten players. In European competitions, they entered the 199899 UEFA Champions League group stage, being drawn in a group with AFC Ajax, Porto and GNK Dinamo Zagreb. They won the group and qualified to the quarter-finals, gathering 11 points with 3 home wins against Ajax (10), Porto (21) and Croatia Zagreb (20) and two away draws in Porto (22) and Zagreb (11). In the quarter-finals of the competition, they faced Juventus F.C., with the first leg in Turin. Juventus took a 20 lead, but Olympiacos scored a crucial away goal in the 90th minute of the game with a penalty by Andreas Niniadis, a goal that caused the 10.000 Olympiacos fans who travelled to Italy to erupt into joyous ecstasy. In the second leg in Athens, Olympiacos totally donimated the match, and scored the goal that put them in the driving seat in the 12th minute of the game, when Sinisa Gogics powerful header found the back of the net after Grigoris Georgatoss superb cross. They also missed an outstanding chance to double the lead, when Georgios Amanatidis powerful header from short distance was saved by Michelangelo Rampulla. Olympiacos kept the ticket to the semi-finals in his hands until the 85th minute, when Juventus, who hadnt produced any chances in the game, equalised the score after a crucial mistake by Dimitrios Eleftheropoulos, who had been the teams hero in all the previous games. Despite the big disappointment from the way the qualification to the semi-finals was lost, the presence of the team in the Champions League quarter-finals, their best-ever European campaign, combined with the domestic double, marked a very successful season for the club, arguably the best in their long history.
Who scored a goal in the 12th minute?

A: Sinisa Gogics

P: A questionable role in the rebellion was played by Leonard Dacre, an early sympathiser of Mary. At the outbreak of the rebellion, he travelled to Elizabeth's court at Windsor to claim the heritage of his young nephew, the 5th Baron Dacre. After the latter's untimely death in 1569, this had descended to his sisters, all married to sons of the Duke of Norfolk. Dacre returned to Northern England, ostensibly a faithful partisan of Elizabeth, but his intentions remain unclear. After the retreat of the rebels, he seized Greystoke Castle and fortified his own Naworth Castle, where he gathered 3,000 Cumbrian troops and tried to keep up the appearance of good relations with the Queen. He held out against a siege of the royal army under Baron Hunsdon but then attacked the retreating army at Gelt River. Though Hunsdon was outnumbered, he charged Dacre's foot with his cavalry, killing 300-400 and capturing 200-300 men. Dacre escaped via Scotland to Flanders, where he died in exile.
Answer this: Who had more troops, Dacre or Hunsdon?

A: Dacre

Problem: In the south too, the Mon-speaking kingdom based out of Martaban had slowly come into its own. It formally broke away from its overlord Sukhothai in 1330. The southern kingdom's relationship with Sukhothai had always been an opportunistic arrangement from the beginning, designed to secure its rear in case of invasions from Upper Burma. In March 1298, just four years after he became a vassal of Sukhothai, when the Upper Burma ceased to be a threat, Wareru conveniently asked for and received recognition directly from the Mongol emperor as governor even though Sukhothai itself was already a vassal of the Mongols. Indeed, when Sukhothai grew weaker, Martaban seized the Tenasserim coast from Sukhothai in 1319. A decade later, Sukhothai tried to reassert control, reoccupying Tenasserim, and attacking Martaban in 1330. Martaban's defences held. It threw off any formal ties with Sukhothai. Nonetheless, the kingdom remained fragmented into three power centres: the Irrawaddy delta in the west, Pegu in the middle and Martaban in the southeast, each with its own chief, who pledged nominal allegiance to the high king. In 1363, Martaban revolted, and outlasted Pegu's armies. After six years, Pegu gave up. Martaban would be independent for another 20 years until 1389.

How many years after Martaban formally broke away from its overlord Sukhothai did Martaban revolt againts Pegu's armies?
Answer: 33

Q: The period of the grandiose expansion of Sweden met its limits in two wars: the Great Northern War which ended in the Treaty of Nystad in 1721 and the Hat's War with the Treaty of Turku in 1743. Sweden lost all its provinces in the Baltic region, and a portion of eastern Finland to Russia. The Valaam Monastery was re-established in Lake Ladoga, and a new main church was consecrated in 1719. Monks returned to Konevsky Monastery before 1716. The Russian government favoured the activities of the religion they had professed for many centuries. The Emperors and Empresses paid for the reconstruction of burnt or otherwise demolished churches. The Orthodox population of Eastern Finland again had access to making pilgrimages to the monasteries of Solovetsk and Alexander-Svirsky. The Old Believers, a schismatic group of Russians who did not accept the religious reforms of patriarch Nikon in 1666-67, were excommunicated from the Orthodox Church and fled to the outskirts of Russia. They also moved into the remote areas of Finland building three small monasteries there. However, the activity of these monasteries stopped during the following century.
Which Treaty was signed first to end a Sweden war, Treaty of Nystad or Treaty of Turku?
A: Treaty of Nystad

Problem: There were 2,380 households of which 18.4% had children under the age of 18 living with them, 28.6% were Marriage living together, 6.3% had a female householder with no husband present, 3.2% had a male householder with no wife present, and 61.9% were non-families. 32.1% of all households were made up of individuals and 11.9% had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 2.37 and the average family size was 2.82.
Answer this question based on the article: Which group for households is smaller: Marriage living together or made up of individuals?
A:
Marriage living together