Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.

[EX Q]: I've been around drugs enough to know FORcA FACT that opiate drug users seak these doctors out and are highly aware of the presence for cheap/legally prescribed drugs. They get a few of their buddies to round up a few hundred dollars cash to get in, then they divide up the drug prescription. You act like a doctor who runs a pill mill, and he does, do not kid yourself so you can make an opposing comment/opinion, that he would not know the exact patients to prescive and the excuses he can use. Drug users do not go to get bottles of pills to go kill themselves. They go to get high. If you want evidence, go to every patient he most recently prescribed and do a pill count and new large TV purchases.
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: Supposedly, HB 2960, which established this program provides that "(n) Provide that the State of Oregon and employers that participate in the plan have no proprietary interest in the contributions to or earnings on amounts contributed to accounts established under the plan."

Of course, that is a Legislative Law; they can change it any time Senator Prozanski or Representative Barnhart or any other Democrat decides that they need more money for one of their programs; they are in the Majority and can just slap the Emergency Clause on new Legislation anytime they feel like it and do whatever they please because the Republicans have no say and the people can't do an Initiative to stop them.
[EX A]: Yes

[EX Q]: The FBI 'Went full retard on the place'???
Yeah, that sounds like a real valuable piece of evidence! NOT! Who wrote this drivel? The Bundy, their mentally challenged supporters,
and their under investigation attorneys can
can dream all they want but the Bundys and their groupies will be incarcerated for a long time, thankfully.
[EX A]:
Yes