Question: Sentence A: The film has been consciously devised as the flip side of All About Eve (1950)--as a tale of women not bitchily at one another's throats but holding one another together through life's most senseless tragedies.

Sentence B: The film is about women who don't get along and try to subvert each other.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question: This naked, righteous populism makes McCain a superb advocate on campaign finance and tobacco.
This form of populism makes McCain a good advocate on both tobacco and campaign finance.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Problem: Here is a premise:
The new policy narrows the definition to providing legal advice or representation to people who cannot afford it.

Here is a hypothesis:
The new policy makes it harder for poor people to get legal advice.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Sentence 1: 'Wake that driver up.

Sentence 2: Driver is snoring happily, so waking him up will be hard.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question:
Reconstructed older buildings are interspersed with new houses, shops, and synagogues, and throughout the area you can see archaeological finds uncovered during excavations in the 1970s.

Does it follow that "All of the older buildings were demolished to make way for new houses, shops, and synagogues."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
no

Question:
Based on the premise "But I think that, in an ambiguous, legal, without prejudishish lawyer's way, he was trying to warn me.", can we conclude that "He was trying to warn me of the potential consequences of my legally dubious actions."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
it is not possible to tell