Q: Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "A child wearing a hat and jacket is outside running on a stone surface."
Hypothesis: "A child is running after his dog outside."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
A: A child running outside on a stone surface does not mean that the child is always running after his dog.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

QUESTION: Given the sentence "A poor village in mexico." is it true that "A village in mexico filled with underprivileged people."?

Let's solve it slowly: The village is filled with underprivileged people so that implies it is a poor village.
The answer is yes.

[QUESTION] Premise: "Two women are at work along a balcony on the edge of a bamboo forest."
Hypothesis: "Two women are watching a movie on their day off."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
If two women are at work then they are not on their day off.
The answer is no.

Q: Can we conclude from "A dog catches a ball in its mouth." that "A dog catches a red ball his owner threw."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
A: The ball need not be red and need not have been thrown by its owner.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

QUESTION: Given the sentence "A dog that looks much like a coyote jumps into the air over a grassy field to catch a tennis ball." can we conclude that "A dog that looks like a coyote jumps to catch a tennis ball before another dog can reach it."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Let's solve it slowly: A dog jumping for a ball is not necessarily trying to get it before another dog can reach it.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

QUESTION: Given the sentence "Two people riding their bikes on a hill." is it true that "Two goldfish are riding bikes in a pile of mashed potatoes."?

Let's solve it slowly:
Goldfish are not people. A pile of mashed potatoes is not a hill.
The answer is no.