IN: This is an email
Frank, Attached is a forwards detail of a Sithe deal from 1993. It is an annuity totalling $234MM. Let me know if this is the deal you were looking for. Thanks,

What is the subject?

OUT: Sithe Deal from 1993

IN: This is an email
A jeweler watched as a huge truck pulled up in front of his store. The back came down and an elephant walked out. It broke one of the windows with its tusk and then, using its trunk like a vacuum cleaner sucked up all of the jewelry. The elephant then got back in the truck and it disappeared out of sight. When the jeweler finally regained his senses he called the police. The detectives came and he told them his story. "Could you describe the elephant?" the cop asked. "An elephant is an elephant," he replied. "You've seen one you've seen them all. What do you mean 'describe' him?" "Well," said the policeman, "there are two types of elephants, African and Indian. The Indian elephant has smaller ears and is not as large as the African elephant." "I can't help you out," said the frustrated jeweler, "he had a stocking pulled over his head."

What is the subject?

OUT: EYEWITNESS

IN: This is an email
Gang: I'm finalizing what we talked about yesterday and something struck me w.r.t. siting reform. One of our key messages in California and nationally is that price spikes are due in no small part to outmoded, arcane siting rules and a shortage of power as a result. Price spikes have led to wholesale and retail price caps, investigations, utility under-recovery, and threats of rolling back de-regulation, to name a few. Understanding that Dave raises some good points about why he's not thrilled about getting involved in more siting reform bills, could someone argue that from a corporate objective, getting a good siting reform bill passed this session is a fairly high priority? I'm not sure what the answer is, but it struck me as I was pretty-ing up the document and I thought I'd put it out there for reaction. Best,

What is the subject?

OUT:
Siting strategy