IN: This is an email
Mark, While Enron's management teams are reviewing actions plans for the upcoming six to nine months, I understand that functional transition teams will be assembled to address the planned merger. I would like to register my strong interest in assisting any transition team where my skills could add value. Prior to developing and supporting corporate as well as enterprise systems at Enron my career has spanned across General Electric Capital Services and ABB on a global basis. Much of this experience has included system integration and change management. Let me know if you have any questions to the above. Otherwise, I wanted to let you know of my interest and desire in working towards a successful transition for Enron. Regards,

What is the subject?

OUT: Merger Transition Teams

IN: This is an email
Elizabeth: I am one of the contract attorneys from Bracewell & Patterson assisting EES on various projects. One of the matters which has been delegated to me is the review of a Master Power Purchase & Sale Agreement between EES and A'lones. I met with Richard Ring yesterday, and he indicated that you might be able to answer a few questions. First, Richard has informed me that ENA was heavily involved in the development of this document, and, as a result, the form is used "as is" and without amendment, save for information to be provided in the Cover Sheet. One of my "marching orders" is that choice of law provisions in EES paper should require Texas law. The Edison form opts for New York. Is this something that can be changed? Second, what about more substantive matters, such as who takes the lead in sending transaction confirmations? In the A'lones transaction, it is contemplated that EES will be the Buyer. The Edison form places primary confirmation obligations on the Seller. I am informed that EES prefers to be the confirming party, regardless of whether it is the buyer or seller. Is this something that can be changed? Third, there are a variety of typographical and reference errors. i.e. double commas (see paragraph 2.2), doubled phrases (paragraph 5.1(h)(i)), and possibly mistaken use of defined terms (see use of "Product" in second line of paragraphs 4.1 and 4.2). What is the Company's position on correcting these types of items? I apologize that this is being e-mailed, as it would probably be quicker by phone, but my connection to the phone system is lagging somewhat behind my connection to the computer network. Thank you for your time and attention. Scott L. Franck Bracewell & Patterson, L.L.P.

What is the subject?

OUT: Edison Electric Institute/Master Power Purchase & Sale Agreement

IN: This is an email
I knew we would have to address this eventually. CES is long 3600/month in TGT Z4 at CG&E. I showed them a $2.66 bid for tomorrow. Before I had worked up the price, CES decided to take the gas into CGAS at Lebanon. This gets real messy. Is there any way we can refuse this? At first, I was thinking we would have to do this. Now, I don't like the idea because it will be really messy in the summer.

What is the subject?

OUT:
CES moving deals