Problem: Here is a premise:
The final rule withdraws both exemptions and introduces three limited exemptions for permissible payments by employers to bona fide employees.

Here is a hypothesis:
The last rule deals with payments that are allowable.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Sentence 1: You are not pleased with me, mon ami?

Sentence 2: I see that you are very happy with me, my friend.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: no

Question:
Nehru got his Independence and Jinnah his Partition a Pakistan whose eastern Bengali portion was to break away 24 years later to become Bangladesh.

Does it follow that "Part of Bengal became Iran."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
no

Q: If it's it's probably safer at least now can't get hit this way you know, can we say that "It's probably much safer now that it has dual airbags. "?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A: it is not possible to tell

Premise:
"But there is a plan I have thought of "Leon hesitated, and Drew guessed he was about to make a suggestion which he believed might meet with disapproval."
Hypothesis: Leon guessed that Drew was about to suggest a plan.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

no

Sentence 1: Houston is really humid now

Sentence 2: Houston is freezing and dry right now.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer:
no