The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.

Q: Context: 'Hello hood to see a fellow camper. How are you doing today?🙂' 'Hey! I'm doing great, how are you? '
Utterance: 'Looking forward to doing some serious hiking with the family. bad luck on the way here we flew in and the airline loss or bags with some of our supplies and sleeping bags.☹️'

A: Yes
****
Q: Context: 'I would love as much food as is available. I would also appreciate excess firewood, as I get cold.' 'Okay, it seems we both have the same priorities in food most and firewood second most. How about this, you take 2 packages of food, I will take 1. You give me 2 packages of firewood I will give you 1. We will then divide the water. Is that fair?' 'That sounds really fair! 🙂'
Utterance: 'Would you be willing to give me 2 water and you take 1?'

A: No
****
Q: Context: 'hello friend i will like to sugest if i can have 2 packages of food and 1 firewood,you can have i food 2 firewood and 3 water,let me know what you think?' 'I don't think that's going to work for me, but I'm sure we can come up with an agreement.'
Utterance: 'okay friend you can have 3 firewood and 3 water is that good enough?'

A:
No
****