Premise:
"Most fans prefer that such wrecks not occur, but when they do, fans pay justifiably close attention to the driver's fate."
Hypothesis: Fans pay close attention to the driver's fate.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

yes

input question: His task is to lance the bull's huge shoulder muscles; it's unattractive but necessary, both to weaken the bull and to lower his head for the kill. If this premise is true, does that tell us:"The bull's shoulder muscles do not have to be lanced to weaken the bull."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: no

Question:
Based on the premise "The chart below, extracted from the analysis, shows that, with the exception of the first year, EPA believes that the cost of the benefits associated with the implementation of the rule's requirements greatly exceed the costs of implementation of the rule.", can we conclude that "The first year was the least beneficial for them."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
no

Question: Sentence A: You can attack the privatization argument on two main fronts.

Sentence B: The privatization argument can be confronted on two fronts.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Question: In its shadow sits the statue of no velist Sir Walter Scott (and his faithful dog, Maida) carved from Cararra marble.
The statue Sir Walter Scott and his dog are carved from marble.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Problem: Here is a premise:
There's something about you, Mr. Whittington, that I don't like at all.

Here is a hypothesis:
You're hiding something, Mr. Whittington.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer:
it is not possible to tell