Categorize the comment on the basis of severe toxicity. If the comment is severely toxic output Yes, otherwise output No.
One example: First off IDIOTS HIS HONDA IS NOT STOLEN I HAVE THE TITLE SIGNED OFF BY LAST OWNER IN MY POSSESSION.2ND THE ONLY THING HE WAS IN TROUBLE FOR BEFORE THE CHASE WAS FOR NOT CHECKING IN WITH HIS PROBATION OFFICER WHICH BRINGS THIS FACT TO LIGHT.YOU CAN DOWNLOAD DOUGLAS COUNTY PROBATION DEPARTMENT LIST OF CURRENT PEOPLE ON PROBATION AND SCROLL THROUGH THE ENTIRE LIST HIS NAME IS NOWHERE ON IT.I ALSO HAVE THAT LIST ON MY PHONE DIRECTLY FROM TTHEIR WEBSIGHT SO THEREFORE I AM GOING TO INVESTIGATE MORE AND BE FILING PAPERWORK AND IF NEEDBE I WILL GO THRU FBI TO RESOLVE THE ACTIONS OF THE CROOKED DEALINGS OF DCPD....IF YOURE GONNA WRITE A STORY ABOUT SOMEONE YOU SHOULD GET THE FACTS STRAIGHT..ALSO I WAS NOT ON PHONE WITH MY SON DURING THE CHASE.HE CALLED ME AT THE BEGINNING OF CHASE AND AFTER HE LEFT HIS CAR.THE DEPUTIES WERE RIGHT HE4E WITH ME DURING MOST OF CHASE .SO AGAIN GET YOUR STORY STRAIGHT..I HAVE NOT HEARD FROM MY SONS SINCE THEN...
Solution is here: Yes
Explanation: The comment here contains all caps phrase which is interpreted as strong language in text. Also, it has word 'IDIOTS' which is meant as an derogatory attack on a subject. This should be severly toxic . Hence, it is a positive example

Now, solve this: I agree that all of these are frightening aspects of Trump. However, some of them apply equally to Clinton. I've been sitting through a primary where Clinton and her surrogates have been belittling even those liberals who don't support her (calling them sexist, stupid, etc.) She also has a history of doing whatever it takes to get her way regardless of the cost to others (ACA, eagerness to use military force, etc.) And both Trump and Clinton are corporatists.

Trump scares me, yes, but Clinton does as well.
Solution:
Yes