input: Make use of the article to answer the questions. There are stories about two US Presidents,Andrew Jackson and Martin Van Buren,which attempt to explain the American English term OK. We don't know if either story is true,but they are both interesting.

The first explanation is based on the fact that President Jackson had very little education. In fact,he had difficulty reading and writing. When important papers came to Jackson,he tried to read them and then had his assistants explain what they said. If he approved of a paper, he would write "all correct" on it. The problem was that he didn't know how to spell. So what he really wrote was "ol korekt". After a while,he shortened that term to "OK".

The second explanation is based on the place where President Van Buren was born,Kinderhook,New York. Van Buren's friends organized a club to help him become president. They called the club the Old Kinderhook Club,and anyone who supported Van Buren was called "OK". 1. What two men are mentioned in this story?
2. What degree did Jackson earn?
3. How many theories are explained here?
numbered_answers: 1. US Presidents
2. None, President Jackson had very little education
3. Two

input: Make use of the article to answer the questions. (CNN) -- We first thought about starting this piece with the story of Saleha Begum, a survivor of Bangladesh's 1971 war in which, some reports say, as many as 400,000 women were raped. Begum had been tied to a banana tree and repeatedly gang raped and burned with cigarettes for months until she was shot and left for dead in a pile of women. She didn't die, though, and was able to return home, ravaged and five months pregnant. When she got home she was branded a "slut."

We also thought of starting with the story of Ester Abeja, a woman in Uganda who was forcibly held as a "bush wife" by the Lord's Resistance Army. Repeated rape with objects destroyed her insides. Her captors also made her kill her 1-year-old daughter by smashing the baby's head into a tree.

We ran through a dozen other stories of women like Begum and Abeja, and finally realized that it would be too difficult to find the right one -- the tale that would express exactly how and in what ways sexualized violence is being used as a weapon of war to devastate women and tear apart communities around the world, conflict by conflict, from Libya to the Democratic Republic of Congo.

It is because of this complexity that we must understand how sexualized violence is being used. We must understand in order to stop it -- just as, when seeking to defuse a bomb, it is crucial to know its components. Both the World Health Organization and the U.N. Security Council have recognized that there is a lack of research on the nature and extent of sexualized violence in conflict, even as there is increasing demand from U.N. bodies, donors, and others for better analysis to work toward prevention and healing. 1. Where did Salena Begum live?
2. Was there a war going on there?
3. When?
4. Was Begum sexually assaulted?
5. For how long?
6. Did her assaulters free her?
7. Did she manage to get back to her home?
8. Where was Ester Abeja from?
9. Did she suffer the same type of assaults as Begum?
10. Did she have any children?
numbered_answers: 1. Bangladesh
2. Yes.
3. 1971
4. Yes.
5. For months.
6. Yes
7. Yes.
8. Uganda
9. Yes.
10. Yes.

input: Make use of the article to answer the questions. Washington (CNN) -- It was a long summer for President Barack Obama, who for months has defended his decision not to send U.S. troops to fight ISIS on the ground in the Middle East.

But lawmakers contend that in the wake of a rapidly-spreading Ebola crisis and the upcoming midterm elections, the President's commitment towards fighting the extremist terrorist organization has fallen short.

Comparing the spread of Ebola to the ISIS threat against the United States, Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-South Carolina, said Sunday that he doesn't believe that the President is handling each issue with equal rigor.

"The stronger Ebola gets in Africa, the more it spreads and the more entrenched it is -- the more endangered we are," Graham told Candy Crowley on CNN's "State of the Union" Sunday. "The same (goes) for radical Islam in the Mideast. It seems to be that the President is all in when it comes to Ebola. I want to compliment him for sending troops to help get ahead of this in Africa, but we have a series of half-measures with (ISIS)."

His Republican colleague, Sen. Kelly Ayotte of New Hampshire, went a step further Sunday, saying that the President's foreign policy "is being trapped by his campaign rhetoric."

Ebola becomes an election issue

"I'm very fearful as we look at the current military strategy that it is surrounding the November elections and that he won't have the resolve to follow through with what needs to be done in a sustained effort to destroy ISIS, and we're about to repeat the same thing with Afghanistan," Ayotte said on Fox News Sunday. 1. Who was the president?
2. How many Republicans were quoted?
3. Are they both from the same state?
4. Are there elections coming up?
5. When?
6. What terrorist group is mentioned?
7. Where are they located?
8. Is the US fighting them on the ground?
9. What else could cause the US potential harm?
10. Where is that spreading?
11. Is it spreading quickly?
12. Which senator is from New Hampshire?
13. What media outlet did he talk to?
14. Did he think Obama would do what he thinks should be done to fight terrorism?
15. With how many countries or groups did he think that about?
16. Where was the other senator from?
17. What show did he appear on?
18. On what network?
19. Did he think the president was committed to both issues?
20. Which one did he think the president was more committed to?
numbered_answers:
1. Barack Obama
2. Two
3. No
4. yes
5. November
6. ISIS
7. Middle East
8. No
9. spread of Ebola
10. Africa
11. yes
12. Kelly Ayotte
13. Fox News
14. No
15. two
16. South Carolina
17. State of the Union
18. CNN
19. NO
20. Ebola