Question:
Based on the premise "Somebody's Not Telling the On This Week , Watergate prosecutor Richard Ben-Veniste rips Starr's leaky office, noting that Archibald Cox and Leon Jaworski, the two chief Watergate special prosecutors that Ben-Veniste worked with, never leaked a thing.", can we conclude that "There was no leak coming from Archibald Cox and Leon Jaworsky."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
yes

Question: Sentence A: As inexplicably it changed to relief.

Sentence B: Just as mysteriously, it turned into relief.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Question: Then that arrangement will suit you?
You're happy with the arrangement we scheduled for tomorrow night?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Problem: Here is a premise:
Basic filing fees would then be $55.

Here is a hypothesis:
Basic filing fees are no longer charged.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Sentence 1: But Drew was uncertain just how he would rub along with Shannon in the future.

Sentence 2: Drew knew that he would get along with Shannon.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: no

Premise:
"Western books were banned, as were Chinese books that mentioned Christianity."
Hypothesis: There was a ban on books that mentioned Christianity.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
yes