Premise:
"We have reclaimed as revolutionary heroes George Orwell and Lionel Trilling."
Hypothesis: George Orwell and Lionel Trilling are not to us revolutionary heroes.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

no

input question: okay right right right we made those yeah yeah yeah i used to referee soccer games and uh uh i would use those watches to time the games and i'd be out on the field middle of the field at high noon If this premise is true, does that tell us:"I never used a watch for the soccer games."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: no

Question:
Based on the premise "The effects of computer-tailored smoking cessation messages in family practice settings.", can we conclude that "All smoking cessation messages must be hand crafted by humans."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
no

Question: Sentence A: and and there's no way that you can get him unless it's by force

Sentence B: Get him with the weakness in you.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question: The 90 percent source-specific control for mercury is also problematic.
The mercury is derived from deep, fresh soil.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Problem: Here is a premise:
True monogamy, then, would seem a very worthwhile institution.

Here is a hypothesis:
True monogamy is good for society.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer:
yes