Problem: BODY: I'm OK with the language, but I want to make sure everyone is OK on the concept. When we left this (unless there have been subsequent conversations with ECS that I wasn't a part of) we rejected Courtney's proposal to reduce our up front payment by $500,000. He was to come back and propose a monthly quantity of gas to be paid over the term of the contract that would equate to the $500,000, but I don't recall that we agreed to it. Did we intend to leave the issue open for more horsetrading on the amount of a haircut ECS should take or were we content to cover ECS at 100 cents on the dollar? I am advised that the Btu number in the letter would allow ECS to get the full $500,000 of up front value. Rod and Steve--this one is up to you and I think its totally a question of
======
A: SUBJECT: Supplement to Gas Letter

Problem: BODY: Thanks for the note and congratulations. Sorry we didn't get a chance to talk before you left. But, I'm still here; give me a call when you get a chance - 1586.
======
A: SUBJECT: Gooooooooooood Bye!

Problem: BODY: We have combined everyone's input and here is where we are thus far. We are targeting Friday, 9/21 for mail out of the invitations. The initial invitation will not have the steering committee members listed, due to timing of the mail out. A second mail out is scheduled for two weeks prior to the event. The second mail out will include the steering committee members. please forward your comments to my attention as soon as possible. Thank you for your input,
======
A:
SUBJECT: Draft of October Event Invitation