input question: This counseling is provided by a private job placement service under contract. If this premise is true, does that tell us:"This counseling is not under a contract."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: no

Question:
Based on the premise "uh-huh uh-huh yeah the the unfortunately the way the the way the high tech market goes by the time you can get get something in your hands um it it's it's obsolete and uh", can we conclude that "The high tech market is sluggish; you can go for years without anything new."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
no

Question: Sentence A: Take Samuel Cartwright, for instance, who in 1851 coined two ingenious new diagnoses to be applied to drapetomania , or running away (recommended whipping), and dysaesthesia aethiopis , whose symptoms were sloth and a tendency to break things (recommended whipping).

Sentence B: No new diagnoses for drapetomania were possible, it was just a mental illness.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question: It is incumbent upon boards to establish processes that are appropriate and effective to restore investor confidence rather than relying on a checklist approach to corporate governance.
Restoring the confidence of the investors happens when we establish appropriate processes.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Problem: Here is a premise:
The young men were on the point of coming to blows.

Here is a hypothesis:
At no point were they considering a physical fight.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question:
And how then can we sustain the race-nation opposition central to double consciousness?

Does it follow that "In regards to dual consciousness, how can we support the nation?"?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
yes