In this task you are given a disfluent question, a proper question and a context. A disfluent question is a question that has some interruptions in it while framing and a proper question is the correct form of the question without any disfluency. Classify whether the question is answerable or not based on the given context.

[Q]: proper question: Who was part of the case with Wisconsin in 1976?
disfluent question: Who was part of the case with Wisconsin in 1852 or no make that in 1976?
context: Private schooling in the United States has been debated by educators, lawmakers and parents, since the beginnings of compulsory education in Massachusetts in 1852. The Supreme Court precedent appears to favor educational choice, so long as states may set standards for educational accomplishment. Some of the most relevant Supreme Court case law on this is as follows: Runyon v. McCrary, 427 U.S. 160 (1976); Wisconsin v. Yoder, 406 U.S. 205 (1972); Pierce v. Society of Sisters, 268 U.S. 510 (1925); Meyer v. Nebraska, 262 U.S. 390 (1923).
[A]: No

[Q]: proper question: What do bad time elements lead to?
disfluent question: Where nope, rather what do bad time elements lead to?
context: A construction project is a complex net of contracts and other legal obligations, each of which all parties must carefully consider. A contract is the exchange of a set of obligations between two or more parties, but it is not so simple a matter as trying to get the other side to agree to as much as possible in exchange for as little as possible. The time element in construction means that a delay costs money, and in cases of bottlenecks, the delay can be extremely expensive. Thus, the contracts must be designed to ensure that each side is capable of performing the obligations set out. Contracts that set out clear expectations and clear paths to accomplishing those expectations are far more likely to result in the project flowing smoothly, whereas poorly drafted contracts lead to confusion and collapse.
[A]: No

[Q]: proper question: How did Saint-Girard respond to Washington?
disfluent question: How did Saint-Girard respond to Jacques Legardeur de Saint-Pierre, oh make that to Washington?
context: Jacques Legardeur de Saint-Pierre, who succeeded Marin as commander of the French forces after the latter died on October 29, invited Washington to dine with him. Over dinner, Washington presented Saint-Pierre with the letter from Dinwiddie demanding an immediate French withdrawal from the Ohio Country. Saint-Pierre said, As to the Summons you send me to retire, I do not think myself obliged to obey it. He told Washington that France's claim to the region was superior to that of the British, since Rene-Robert Cavelier, Sieur de La Salle had explored the Ohio Country nearly a century earlier.
[A]:
No