In this task, you're given a statement, and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence clearly disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3' corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

Statement: Therefore, the National Energy Plan recommended that the Administration's approach include appropriate measures to address local concerns, such as the unlikely occurrence of an SO2 hot spot or area of concentrated emissions. Choices: 1. The National Energy Plan recommended that the Administration's address the unlikely occurrence of an SO2 hot spot or area of concentrated emissions. 2. The National Energy Plan did not have any recommendations for the Administration's approach to address local concerns. 3. The occurrence of an SO2 hot spot or area of concentrated emissions in unlikely but highly dangerous.
2

Statement: and it seems like uh um we're catching all their residue i'm not sure if it's kerosene or what that's dropping but other than that you know we don't have the unless we're catching it from the midwest the emissions yeah from the power plants Choices: 1. The residue could be kerosene or it could be something else entirely. 2. Power plants emit a lot of residue that we end up catching. 3. I'm sure that the residue coming from the power plants is safe.
3

Statement: The phrase present in the United States appears to have originated in proposed legislation that would have expanded the categories of aliens eligible for LSC funded representation. Choices: 1. There is a special category for aliens eligible for LSC funded representation. 2. The U.S. does not have any aliens eligible for LSC funded representation. 3. Aliens eligible for LSC funded representation are regarded as citizens of the U.S.
2