[QUESTION] Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "A boy jumps near a brick structure."
Hypothesis: "The boy is leaping over a small brick wall."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
Jumps near doesn't imply leaping over. Brick structure doesn't imply brick wall.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

Q: Given the sentence "A large group of people crosscountry skiing in the snow." is it true that "People skiing together on snow."?
A: A group of people skiing implies that people are skiing together.
The answer is yes.

QUESTION: Given the sentence "A baby sits in a stroller." can we conclude that "While being pushed along a pier or bridge."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Let's solve it slowly: A baby in a stroller is being pushed down the pier.
The answer is yes.

[QUESTION] Premise: "A few people walking around in a city."
Hypothesis: "A few people walking around."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Walking around in a city is a way of walking around.
The answer is yes.

Q: If "Two black and brown dogs are running through a field." does that mean that "The dogs are running from eachother."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A: Dogs can run in a field for a number of reasons besides running from eachother.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

[QUESTION] Given the sentence "A cyclist wearing a red and black jersey is competing in a race." can we conclude that "A cyclist competing in a race."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
One of the cyclists competing in the race is wearing a red and black jersey .
The answer is yes.