In this task, you're given a statement, and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence clearly disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3' corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

[EX Q]: Statement: They wallow in anti-government rhetoric as if Oklahoma City had never been bombed, but make no assault on the federal leviathan. Choices: 1. Oklahoma City was bombed. 2. Oklahoma City had never been bombed. 3. Some entities use the bombing as rhetoric to support federal policies.
[EX A]: 2

[EX Q]: Statement: so you know plus less bags less waste Choices: 1. As well as less usage of bags that end up as waste, thereby reducing waste as well. 2. Producing fewer bags and waste was the intended result of the system. 3. You probably are aware that there will be many more bags and a ton more waste.
[EX A]: 3

[EX Q]: Statement: He was losing his uncle. Choices: 1. The man would lose his uncle. 2. He had just found his uncle again. 3. His uncle was going to bleed out and die.
[EX A]:
2