Sentence 1: and no reason to be

Sentence 2: No reason to be.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: yes

Question:
i haven't been doing it so much now that it's calmed down

Does it follow that "It's quieted down now, so I haven't been doing it a lot."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
yes

Q: If This spiritual retreat, 10 km (6 miles) north of Pondicherry, was started in 1968 by a French disciple of the teachings of the Indian sage, Sri Aurobindo., can we say that "The spiritual retreat was started by a French disciple in 1968."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A: yes

Premise:
"It will only be known after the vote of Nov. 6 if the queen will go the way of a species of dinosaur just discovered in Australia."
Hypothesis: The vote is on November 6 in Sydney.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

it is not possible to tell

input question: Slowly she went out of the room. If this premise is true, does that tell us:"She quickly left the room. "?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: no

Q: If Erected in the 16th century, it guarded the bay against pirate ships you can still see the ancient cannons poking through the crenellated walls., can we say that "You can still see cannons that used to protect the bay against pirate ships."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A:
yes