Given the task definition, example input & output, solve the new input case.
In this task, you're given a statement, and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence clearly disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3' corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.
Example: Statement: Next to the MGM Grand you will find M and M World, four stories of merchandise and memorabilia dedicated to the candy that doesn't melt in your hand. Choices: 1. The candy has many fans who love its attractions. 2. There's four stories of memorabilia dedicated to a candy. 3. That particular candy melts and becomes difficult to eat.
Output: 3
It is said in the statement that the candy doesn't melt in your hand, but the sentence in choice 3 disagrees with it.

New input case for you: Statement: From that it developed in great detail the fact that any part of a whole bearing similarity to the whole was also the whole; that each seven was the class of all sevens; and other details of the science of magical similarity followed quite logically from the single axiom. Choices: 1. Any part of the whole is the whole. 2. It is like the saying all is one and one is all. 3. A whole isn't equal to a part.
Output:
3