Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.

For others wondering here, NO!!! this is NOTHING CLOSE TO NEWS! This is a talentless person who has done nothing to admire or make news. Yet this is a person chosen, along with the Kardashians or Jenners (who also have no skills, talent, or anything to look up to as a role model), to have endless articles about nothing published about them. This is the bread and butter of People and E! and others I don't want to remember.

If anything, if you are going to drag this into something to call a news story, you need to add an accurate piece about history: 'Bristol, daughter of Sarah Palin, the governor of Alaska for almost a year and half who was very surprisingly chosen as a vice presidential candidate by McCain, though had virtually no political experience. Sarah Palin went on to be widely mocked in the media for her lack of knowledge on any relevant political issues and Obama defeated the McCain-Palin ticket.'
or take it to more recent context and describe how involved/knowledgeable sheis
Yes

The primary reason this project has involved so much construction and costs is the city's commitment to "level of service", which means we won't ever put in transit, pedestrian or cycling amenities that would adversely impact the travel times of single occupant vehicles.

Agencies that pay attention to the data, like the federal highway administration and CalTrans, have largely done away with LOS. They have rightfully accepted the science that has proven induced demand (building more travel lanes induces more extra driving than those lanes can handle, thus increasing congestion; one trip to SoCal shows what this means).

Here, our backwards traffic planners/engineers continue to be beholden to a failed model. These bozos even shut down the Fern Ridge bike path for half a year (again!) for work that should have taken less than two weeks.

Eugene needs to fire its city manager and all of his managers for at least four tiers down. These people just aren't up to the task.
No

Muck, Dick Cheney and George W were oblivious to the expanding housing bubble. They were so surprised when it burst. Clinton initiated home loans to people who could not afford them, which fueled the housing boom. Bush-Cheney thought they were responsible for the booming economy. They spent huge money on crazy wars, expanded government (Patriot Act, Homeland Security,TSA) and could not see the corrupt housing loans causing the bubble. Worst presidency in our history. Worse than Obama's. Deficits definitely do matter.
Yes