The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the self-need strategy, otherwise output No. self-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to create a personal need for an item in the negotiation, such as by pointing out that the participant sweats a lot to show preference towards water packages.

[EX Q]: Context:
Utterance: 'Ok, so I like water a lot.'
[EX A]: Yes

[EX Q]: Context: 'Firewood, how about you?' 'Oh, firewood as well! It's not a camping trip if you run out of firewood in just a few nights! I would hate to be cold ' 'I was thinking S'mores! I will start off....2 firewood, 2 water, 1 food'
Utterance: 'I was thinking smores too! Well I can settle for 1 firewood, but I think I would need more food to keep busy. How about (for me to recieve): 1 firewood, 3 food, 1 water?'
[EX A]: Yes

[EX Q]: Context: 'you pointed out that we will need more! 😮 i will take 2 waters' 'I didn't know you had supplied everyone with water before the trip. I was merely trying to look out for your needs, but you said you didn't need them!' 'I am giving you a lot of food. You are being unreasonable and backtracking. You are getting some of everything with my offers, and there are only two of you.'
Utterance: 'You said you only needed one food package and two bundles of firewood for your group together tonight and had plenty of everything else. You're the one insisting you need more now. This is my son's first camping trip and we're bound to lose supplies and waste them. Your group is trained and prepared.'
[EX A]:
Yes