Question: Sentence A: Randy's Full Responsibility Wraparound

Sentence B: A full responsibility wraparound by Randy.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Question: and now with the photography that's you know it's working that's what i'm doing is working part time because i can put my kids in a day care situation for a few hours in the uh week and and use those hours to do the the thing that i'm doing is taking school pictures
I can put my kids in daycare while I work.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Problem: Here is a premise:
Intragovernmental sales of goods and services by a revolving fund.

Here is a hypothesis:
Sales between government and private firms of goods and services by a static fund.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Sentence 1: You can stop at the seventh or eighth station to rest en route.

Sentence 2: The seventh or eighth station has a place you can stop.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: yes

Question:
This notion argues that the postal service should charge competitors the same amount to use the delivery system that the postal service charges itself.

Does it follow that "Opponents of the notion argue that charging the same would decrease postal service revenues substantially. "?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
it is not possible to tell

Question:
Based on the premise "I still had to select my items from lists, and it was good that I generally knew what types of hardware I was running, but it worked.", can we conclude that "It was good that I generally knew what types of hardware I was running, because I had to select my items from lists, but it worked!"? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
yes