input question: At the same time, almost total dependency on firewood for fuel has deforested the heavily populated middle mountain ranges and led to erosion, landslides, and loss of soil for agriculture. If this premise is true, does that tell us:"The dependence on firewood for fuel has not yet caused any issues, but may in future."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: no

Question:
Based on the premise "So they renovated the old Sweet Candy Company building for Tomax.", can we conclude that "They didn't have the money to renovate the old building."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
no

Question: Sentence A: we had animals for the children you know our horses and that kind of thing and uh school activities type stuff

Sentence B: We had no animals for our kids as they were growing up.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question: steam or momentum and you don't realize it you know it just piles up
There is no way for you to tell that it is piling up.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Problem: Here is a premise:
Government-mandated integration is wrong, he writes, because any endorsement of racial preferences is immoral.

Here is a hypothesis:
Enforced racial preference is not moral .

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Question:
In practice, they tend to make wild claims about the former and ignore the latter.

Does it follow that "They tend to ignore the former and totally exaggerate about the latter."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
no