Question:
Read the text and answer the questions.
In psychology, memory is the process in which information is encoded, stored, and retrieved. Encoding allows information from the outside world to be sensed in the form of chemical and physical stimuli. In the first stage the information must be changed so that it may be put into the encoding process. Storage is the second memory stage or process. This entails that information is maintained over short periods of time. Finally the third process is the retrieval of information that has been stored. Such information must be located and returned to the consciousness. Some retrieval attempts may be effortless due to the type of information, and other attempts to remember stored information may be more demanding for various reasons.

Short-term memory is believed to rely mostly on an acoustic code for storing information, and to a lesser extent a visual code. Conrad (1964) found that test subjects had more difficulty recalling collections of letters that were acoustically similar (e.g. E, P, D). Confusion with recalling acoustically similar letters rather than visually similar letters implies that the letters were encoded acoustically. Conrad's (1964) study, however, deals with the encoding of written text; thus, while memory of written language may rely on acoustic components, generalisations to all forms of memory cannot be made.
1. What is the beginning part of the memory process?
2. The next part?

Numbered answers:
1. the information must be changed
2. Storage

Question:
Read the text and answer the questions.
CHAPTER XXVII.

THE TRIAL.

Edith Hudson spent a restless night, and early in the morning, as early as she thought she could reach him, she called the office of Jimmy's attorney. She told the lawyer that some new evidence was to have been brought in to him and asked if he had received it. Receiving a negative reply she asked that she be called the moment it was brought in.

All that day and the next she waited, scarcely leaving her room for fear that the call might come while she was away. The days ran into weeks and still there was no word from the Lizard.

Jimmy was brought to trial, and she saw him daily in the courtroom and as often as they would let her she would visit him in jail. On several occasions she met Harriet Holden, also visiting him, and she saw that the other young woman was as constant an attendant at court as she.

The State had established as unassailable a case as might be built on circumstantial evidence. Krovac had testified that Torrance had made threats against Compton in his presence, and there was no way in which Jimmy's attorneys could refute the perjured statement. Jimmy himself had come to realize that his attorney was fighting now for his life, that the verdict of the jury was already a foregone conclusion and that the only thing left to fight for now was the question of the penalty.

Daily he saw in the court-room the faces of the three girls who had entered so strangely into his life. He noticed, with not a little sorrow and regret, that Elizabeth Compton and Harriet Holden always sat apart and that they no longer spoke. He saw the effect of the strain of the long trial on Edith Hudson. She looked wan and worried, and then finally she was not in court one day, and later, through Harriet Holden, he learned that she was confined to her room with a bad cold.
1. What was Edith thinking of?
2. who?
3. Did she speak with him?
4. how?
5. What is she asking about?
6. received what?
7. did he?
8. What did she ask of him?
9. when?
10. did it come that day?
11. Who was brought to the courtroom?
12. Was she able to see him?
13. how often?
14. how about in jail?
15. who eklse visited?
16. was she at court also?
17. Was this a short trial?
18. What happened to Edith at the end?
19. did she still go to court?
20. who told him about the cold?

Numbered answers:
1. When she could reach him.
2. Jimmy's attorney.
3. Yes.
4. She told the lawyer that some new evidence was to have been brought in.
5. If he had received it.
6. The new evidence.
7. No.
8. To be called.
9. The moment it was brought in.
10. No.
11. Jimmy.
12. Yes.
13. Daily.
14. As often as they would let her.
15. Harriet Holden.
16. Yes.
17. No.
18. She got a bad cold.
19. No.
20. Harriet Holden.

Question:
Read the text and answer the questions.
Islamabad, Pakistan (CNN) -- A Pakistani court Monday gave police two weeks to prepare their case for charging five Americans whom police suspect of planning terrorist attacks.

Authorities have said they plan to prosecute the five men -- who are being held in jail -- under the country's anti-terrorism act.

A court hearing was set for January 18.

Police have said they are confident that the Americans were planning terrorist acts, according to Tahir Gujjrar, deputy superintendent of police in Sargodha, where the men were arrested December 9.

Gujjrar told CNN a preliminary investigation suggests that the men came to Pakistan to wage jihad and had sought to link up with Jaish-e-Mohammed and Jamaat-ud-Dawa militant organizations, neither of which showed interest, he said. The men wanted to martyr themselves, he said.

Jaish-e-Mohammed is the group believed to be responsible for the murder of journalist Daniel Pearl.

But Mohammed Ameer Khan Rokhri, an attorney representing the men, said they testified on the Quran, the Muslim holy book, "that they have no connection with any banned organization," including Jaish-e-Mohammed or al Qaeda.

They told the court, "We are going to Afghanistan to help the Muslims who have been injured by the NATO forces and other Afghan forces," the attorney said. And they said the didn't intend to commit any crime in Pakistan, he said.

The five young men are identified as Ahmed Abdullah Minni, Umar Farooq, Aman Hassan Yemer, Waqar Hussain Khan and Ramy Zamzam. All are in their early 20s except Yemer, who, according to the interrogation report from Pakistani police, is 18 years old. Two of the suspects are Pakistani-American, two are Yemeni-American, and one is Egyptian-American.
1. When does the trial start?
2. And they were arrested when?
3. Where?
4. Who is head of the cops?
5. And his title?
6. What was their agenda?
7. And their nationality?
8. How many are jailed?
9. How long until trial?
10. What jurisdiction?
11. What were the charged attempting to start?
12. Did they work with military groups?
13. Which ones?
14. And their reasoning?
15. Who is likely behind the death of Daniel Pearl?
16. Did they enter a guilty plea?
17. What did they testify on?
18. And what is that?
19. Who is their representative in court?
20. How old are the suspected terrorists?
Numbered answers:
1. January 18
2. December 9.
3. Sargodha
4. Tahir Gujjrar
5. deputy superintendent of police
6. terrorist acts
7. Americans
8. five
9. two weeks
10. Pakistani
11. jihad
12. Yes
13. Jaish-e-Mohammed and Jamaat-ud-Dawa
14. to martyr themselves
15. Jaish-e-Mohammed
16. No
17. Quran
18. Muslim holy book
19. Mohammed Ameer Khan Rokhri
20. early 20s except Yemer, who is 18 years old