Subject: "Dayton Exchange starting 1/21/2000".

Body: This is the way I show the Dayton Power exchange deal starting 1/21/2000, please let me know if this is incorrect. ENA delivered gas to Dayton's TGT citygate. In return, Dayton is giving ENA gas at various CGAS citygates. There are no fees for this transaction. The TGT deal is 152766, the CGAS deal is 153213. The volumes on these deals should match. Also, Dayton should not be using any ENA supply (pool gas or ENA storage) to supply the CGAS citygate volume. Comments/questions? Victor, I did not put a meter number on the CGAS deal. Also, it's time to introduce Steve Gillespie to Sitara.

Subject: "any help i can provide".

Body: Dear Mr. Lay - My name is Bobby Gerry and I am an employee here at Enron. I do not know if I may be able to provide any financial help to Enron, but certainly I would like to make myself available. As a family, we own an approximate $700 million in Exxon stock and maintain excellent relationships with several investment banks. My mother, Sandra Mosbacher, myself, my brother, as well as my Aunt Caroline Law have all been actively following Enron's situation and are available to help in any way we can. Sincerest regards, Bobby Gerry

Subject: "Preparing for Legal Action against a retroactive DA suspension".

Body: As of this point in time, the CPUC is NOT expected to vote tomorrow. The CPUC has not said when a new meeting would be held. Although we continue to keep the pressure on, the CPUC vote could be for DA suspension as of July 1. We need to be prepared to take immediate legal action in that event. Here is the plan and what we'd like from customers.

Subject: "WSPP vs EEI".

Body:
The dealers and some of the customers are ok with an EEI but some important counterparties are anti-EEI. BPA comes to mind. Digging in our heels on an EEI-only position might make it difficult to get up and running. Do you have a view of this?