In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence can be inferred from the statement. Incorrect choices change the meaning in important ways or have details that are not mentioned in the statement. Indicate your answer as 1,2, or 3 corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

[Q]: Statement: A good case study reports methodological strengths and limitations for answering the evaluation questions and explains the tradeoffs that were considered and who influenced the decisions. Choices: 1. Limitations of the methodology used should not be discussed in the case study report. 2. Decision influencers can have a negative impact on the study's credibility. 3. Tradeoffs can be made during a case study, and should be disclosed.
[A]: 3

[Q]: Statement: Adopting these criteria facilitates our evaluation of how well the electronic signature system addresses its threats and helps identify vulnerabilities that may be present in the system. Choices: 1. There are no methods to identify vulnerabilities in systems. 2. There are too many methods to identify vulnerabilities in systems. 3. There are methods to identify vulnerabilities in systems.
[A]: 3

[Q]: Statement: To gain a better understanding of how tax incentives affect national saving, look at one how a tax deduction for a traditional tax-deferred IRA may affect government and ultimately national saving. Choices: 1. Most people reading this have poor knowledge of taxes 2. To gain a better understanding of how tax incentives affect national saving it is suggested to look at one how a tax deduction for a traditional tax-deferred IRA may affect government. 3. To gain a worse understanding of how tax incentives affect national saving it is suggested to look at one how a tax deduction for a traditional tax-deferred IRA may affect government.
[A]:
2