TASK DEFINITION: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.
PROBLEM: Comment: For me, there's something powerfully wrong when the BC Liberal government goes ahead and quietly sells-off publicly owned social housing properties/assets like Nicholson Tower, Sunset Towers, or others, without first holding open public consultations/hearings as part of the democratic process involved in the sale of these publicly owned assets first, and that would include the residents most affected by the damn sale and the neighbourhood where the public properties/assets are located - much like public hearings are held on a municipal property re-zoning application for example. But alas, it seems like our beloved less-than-democratically-open BC Liberal government, deemed this wholly unnecessary. Why!??

SOLUTION: Non-identity-attack

PROBLEM: Comment: You are really a very rude and tragic person. I got a notice that you'd 'liked' my comment. I knew something was fishy, lol. You, slinky, don't respect anyone except who you see in the mirror. Shame. Have a good day doc!

SOLUTION: Non-identity-attack

PROBLEM: Comment: So they exist but you can't name any? How is your argument different than those that believe the Loch Ness monster exists, or Bigfoot, or the aboninable snowman? I think the existence of a Yeti would be cool, but I'm not asserting it to be a truth. And you crack me up tossing in our incarceration rate. You're promising everything will be worse with Clinton, but Trump's promising to raise jail more people! You're straying from the message just like him :)

SOLUTION:
Non-identity-attack