Problem: BODY: hi just booked a room (a studio actually) for whistler on feb 16, 17, 18, and 19th... we had to book 4 nights although we are staying only 3 nights. got a pretty good deal considering we get a kitchen, it's ski in and ski out, etc. will be so fun... i am going with my friend ali that i work with, and her roommate sam. they are both super cool we have room for one more person. i know it's a stretch, but since i knew you were interested in heading to whistler at some point and was going to see if you would want to come with us. we would leave on saturday the 16th for whistler and come back to seattle on tuesday the 19th... (monday is presidents day ). it is going to be great fun! presidents day weekend is crazy in whistler, they think of it like christmas time as it is as busy as christmas time or busier. tons of people. im so excited. i know you will be looking for jobs, etc. maybe you could make a trip back up to seattle coincide with a fun trip to whistler! let me know what you think bonnie price is: 299 Canadian a night times 4 nights so total is 1200 Canadian divided by 4 (if you came, there would be 4) is 300 canadian each, which is about 212.00 US... NOt bad for 3 night stay
======
A: SUBJECT: whistler!

Problem: BODY: Now that the celebrating has died down, lets decide whether to seek rehearing or clarification of the order. If there is anything in it that disadvantages us, we should consider rehearing, particularly since it is a nearly certain that our friends at SoCal will file a nasty one. (It might be good for Steve H. or Bill or whoever has the best relationship with SoCal to make a high level courtesy call to extend the olive branch and tell them that we'll work with them to minimize their concerns blah blah blah. At minimum, we'll probably learn if they do intend to seek rehearing) I see two things that may be worth seeking rehearing on: 1. The requirement that we disclose our discount agreements in 15 days. FERC really punted this issue. They say that "since the expansion capacity is fully subscribed we see no reason why Transwestern should not publicly disclose the agreements. . . . " This is the first time I've heard of any rule that if your project is fully subscribed you therefore lose your right to confidential treatment of sensitive pricing info. At minimum, we could argue that the requirement is arbitrary and capricious because FERC didn't even mention its normal regulations and procedures governing filing of discount reports. It just cited the certificate regulation that requires an applicant to "file" its rate information with the Commission (which we did) and ignores the regulation (Sec. 284.7(c)(6)) that doesn't require a pipeline to publicly disclose its discounts until 15 days after the close of the billing period to which the discount pertained. The commercial people need to decide if we care about this issue--i.e., how upset will the customers
======
A: SUBJECT: Gallup Order: PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL, ATTORNEY CLIENT PRIVILEGE

Problem: BODY: When posting Short Term Curves -> you are posting a 6x8+24 into the 7x8 price column. For Short Term the 7x8 column is your 6x8+24 price. (The 6x8+24 price column is not relevant to you.) Please use this order when posting: ON PEAK SUNDAY OFF PEAK
======
A:
SUBJECT: Position Manager