You are given a paragraph, with numbered sentences, and a question. Write the numbers of the sentences needed to answer the given question. Separate multiple sentence numbers with a comma (", "). E.g. "1, 2" would be the correct response if Sent 1 and Sent 2 are needed to answer the given question (do not include sentences that contain no information that is necessary to answer the question). Sort the sentence numbers in an increasing order (i.e., '1, 2', instead of '2, 1'). Your answer should not contain anything than the sentence numbers separated by a comma (e.g. '1, 2, 3, 4'). The given question requires more than one sentence to answer. So, your answer must contain at least one comma (", ").

Let me give you an example: Paragraph- Sent 1: A Republican bid to keep the government open past Friday includes no new money for the construction of a border wall along the U.S.-Mexico border, according to several congressional aides familiar with ongoing talks.
Sent 2: GOP leaders submitted the new offer Tuesday afternoon in an effort to appease Democrats, whose votes are needed to avert a shutdown of federal agencies, several House and Senate aides said.
Sent 3: However, Republicans also insisted on increases in border security and defense spending, including money to repair existing fencing and new surveillance technology to patrol the nearly 2,000-mile border.
Sent 4: Democrats have indicated that they would support such appropriations so long as no money goes toward an actual wall.
Question: Who has to be appeased to keep the government open?.
The answer to this example can be: 1, 2.
Here is why: The question is: Who has to be appeased to keep the government open? The phrase "appease Democrats" is mentioned in Sent 2, about accepting offer that is mentioned in Sent 1 to "keep the government open". So, Sent 1 and Sent 2 are the sentences needed to answer this question.

OK. solve this:
Paragraph- Sent 1: The "visual of a billboard and a narration" is viewed by you as evidence that Moore is trying to somehow tie the two events together, when in reality, it is quite obvious that he does it to separate the introduction of Heston from his speech in Denver.
Sent 2: Moore is a professional filmmaker -- he concentrates on maximum impact of each of the statements he cites, and to accomplish that effect, uses subtle interludes instead of long-winded introductions.
Sent 3: This is a common technique, but because conservative readers are not familiar with the basics of filmmaking, they believe critics who claim that he is "distorting" the interview.
Sent 4: What he does is standard filmmaking practice.
Sent 5: The same goes for the interview which follows.
Sent 6: Moore's critics would expect us to have him quote Heston in his entirety, have him present fully the PR that the NRA has used to justify its rally in Denver for reasons of "balance".
Sent 7: The NRA was fully aware of the scandal it would cause through its rally and decided to push on because they believed to have enough media support to successfully do so.
Sent 8: They were right.
Sent 9: You claim that there was "no way to change location, since you have to give advance notice of that to the members, and there were upwards of 4,000,000 members."Sent 10: 10 days are more than enough to give advance warning of a change in location or date, had the NRA really wanted to.
Sent 11: It is probably correct that their primary reason for not doing so was to save money, not to piss off the victims of Colubmine.
Sent 12: That does not change the fact that they did just that.
Sent 13: Moore presents the most important part of the speech to back up this point and ignores the fluff.
Sent 14: This is what good documentary filmmaking is about.
Sent 15: And here the critics again ignore important evidence: When Heston mentions the mayor of Denver, the crowd boos loudly.
Sent 16: Heston maganimously holds up a hand to read the mayor's letter (only to explain in detail why he chose to ignore the request -- not mentioning at all the reasons you have given!).
Sent 17: This booing by the crowd, not mentioned with a single word in your transcript or your article, shows that the crowd was fully aware of the controversy they would cause by coming to Littleton after children were being killed there -- and they effectively said "Fuck you".
Sent 18: To say that they could not have done otherwise is a bold lie by Moore's critics.
Question: The victims and families of which incidents are upset by Heston's speech?.
Answer:
11, 17.