Village of Euclid, Ohio v. Ambler Realty Co., 272 U.S. 365 (1926) , more commonly Euclid v. Ambler, was a United States Supreme Court landmark case argued in 1926. It was the first significant case regarding the relatively new practice of zoning, and served to substantially bolster zoning ordinances in towns nationwide in the United States and in other countries of the world including Canada.
euclid vs ambler was a landmark case OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No
A: Yes
input hypothesis: It is impossible for America to be screwed.
Context: Feel the burn<br>Bernie Sanders wanted to be president. Bernie Sanders had great ideas. But the people did not believe Bernie's ideas could be pulled off. So the people voted for Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump. Now America is screwed!
OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No
true or false: No
Context:
Jean-Claude Trichet, the European Central Bank president, made it clear, on Wednesday, that he would oppose unwarranted political attempts to remove Antonio Fazio: the Bank of Italy governor, engulfed in controversy over his handling of bank takeover bids.
Hypothesis: Trichet spoke the day before Thursday OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No
Yes
Input: OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No

How to know if a kitten is stressed<br>Notice any digestive problems. Stress and anxiety in a kitten can lead to digestive issues. Diarrhea and constipation are common reactions to stress.

Sentence: Anxiety does not cause constipation.

Output: No
Problem:
Read the following paragraph and determine if the hypothesis is true:

That would ensure that the government's grip on the activities of the Canadian Wheat Board is maintained and the desire for accountability and for farmers to have control and direction over the wheat board through a farmer elected board is circumvented by allowing the appointment of members by the minister.

OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No
Hypothesis: The Wheat Board's members are appointed by the minister.
****
Answer:
Yes
Donald Trump views the mainstream press with contempt, and the mainstream press returns the favor. Or is it the other way around? Just as the president has trouble distinguishing between negative press coverage and "fake news," the journalists who cover him tend to treat every inaccurate, unfounded, or even debatable statement he makes as a lie. And that mistake, suggests Jacob Sullum, clouds the judgment and damages the credibility of reporters and commentators who aspire to skepticism but too often settle for reflexive disbelief. View this article.
Donald Trump has established a good relationship with the mainstream journalists. OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No
A:
No