Question: Sentence A: Alas, the text could have done with more Shrum, who, let's hope, did not pen the line, Home is about freedom.

Sentence B: Shrum would have greatly improved the text.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Question: well uh what do you know what the last repair was uh that that you had done to your car
Regarding your vehicle, when was the last repair completed?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Problem: Here is a premise:
American Movie suggests that there's no such thing as the little people in the hinterlands anymore.

Here is a hypothesis:
American Movie suggests there is still lots of things like little people in the hinterlands.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Sentence 1: And a focus on pure politics is surely better than a focus on personal misbehavior or the issue of whether evangelical Christians should be alone with women not their wives.

Sentence 2: Ignoring personal misbehavior to focus only on politics is a bad idea.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: no

Question:
Recruitment and Retention of Diverse Leadership/Governance

Does it follow that "Recruitment and Retention of Diverse Leadership/Governance"?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
yes

Question:
Based on the premise "Her last husband, and manager, George Richey, was more than overcome by her death.", can we conclude that "She had been married to Richey for twenty two years."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
it is not possible to tell