input question: The final rule revises the tailpipe emission portions of the Federal Test Procedure for light-duty vehicles and light-duty trucks. If this premise is true, does that tell us:"The final rule relates the tail pipe emissions of naval airplanes. "?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: no

Question:
Based on the premise "These tightly controlled commercial pyramids were the true heirs to the old feudal structures.", can we conclude that "These controlled commercial pyramids were the followers of the old feudal structures."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
no

Question: Sentence A: yeah i don't mind that um my husband never cared for fast food so we didn't go that often but you know i have no problem with uh going to a McDonald's or a Wendy's or uh

Sentence B: I have no problem with the food they serve at Wendy's.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question: are you being smart or are you serious
Did you think that was funny?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Problem: Here is a premise:
you know i really think this is good and that well i don't know i think we need that but i know i need it

Here is a hypothesis:
Oh no, I don't need it at all, I think it's awful

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question:
The men were charging.

Does it follow that "The men were running at him."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
yes