Given the task definition and input, reply with output. In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.

Comment: I respect your service. You do understand that the lifelong civilians you deride are WHO you serve right? This is not Starship Troopers were service = citizenship.

I respect your service, thank you. That service however, does not mean that your opinions are any more or less relevant than those who have not.

I respect your service, really. However if stories like this drive you nuts, why then does the current CaC's clear disrespect for those who have served not push you over the edge? Trump never served, yet he has attacked a genuine war hero for being caught by the enemy. Trump never served, nor have any of his children, yet he attacked a Gold Star family. Parents who's son had the courage to do what no Trump ever would do.

So yes, I respect your service. Perhaps you can tell us why you respect Trump's?
Non-threat