IN: This note is an invitation to the Albuquerque Region Cross Functional meeting to be held November 6th & 7th at the Sheraton Hotel in Albuquerque. In addition, please let me know if you would like time in the agenda to share information or address any issues. All the Regional Teams will be represented at this function. Rooms have been blocked for the 5th, 6th & 7th but, we would ask that you make your own reservations. (505-881-0000). If you would like time in the agenda, I need your preferred date and the time required by October 15th. Thank you

Generate a subject line.

OUT: Invitation - Albuquerque Regional Meeting
IN: This is an email
Robert, Here are the machines I've logged on. 1. The computer to the left of my desk, 3275d. 2. Both of my machines. 3. Both of Rock's machines, 3275f. 4. Gabriel's computer, 3275g. Thanks,

What is the subject?

OUT: Profile Problems
QUESTION: After returning home and reviewing the material handed out at the PGE business review, there are two areas that I think I need to understand better. The first is PGE's energy positions going forward and the financial exposures to changing prices. The second is the rate case. I would be happy to return to Portland to get a more in depth review with a much smaller cast of players. I am open to suggestions from you. Given the status of the divestiture process, Jeff wants to make sure he (and subsequently I) have a good handle on these two important issues. Thanks!
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: Business Review
Jeff: Thanks again for all of your time and consideration with respect to our con= sideration of Norm Pedersen to join our Firm in Los Angeles. I just wanted= to let you know that we decided it probably did not make sense to pursue t= hings further with Norm. After drilling down even further, it just seemed = like we were going to run into major conflict problems down the road based = upon the CA regulatory proceedings that likely are going to arise and the n= ature of Norm's historical client base. It also would not have been fair t= o Norm to have him join the Firm and then be conflicted out of work that he= had planned to pursue at the Firm. I can't tell you how much I appreciate= your candor as well as your open-mindedness in helping me evaluate the sit= uation. I really felt bad bothering you with this, but I knew you would ha= ve the best insights into the likely direction of the regulatory proceeding= s in CA and I wanted to make sure that I was being fair in evaluating Norm'= s situation and in a position to make a decision based on all of the releva= nt facts. I also want to emphasize emphatically (if it is possible to use = those words together!) that I do not want you to think or feel that you "ni= xed" Norm or anything along those lines; indeed, I feel quite the opposite.= In addition, from the outset, after first talking to Norm and getting a s= ense for the types of business he has been handling and the issues he has b= een pursuing on behalf of his clients, I had felt it was really a non-start= er since the last thing I wanted to do was to have LeBoeuf on the other sid= e from Enron in important regulatory proceedings for the company. It is on= e thing to receive a waiver to represent another company in a negotiated co= mmercial transaction in which Enron is relying on another law firm, but I c= ould not see us pressing a regulatory agenda directly adverse to Enron's in= terests in a proceeding in which Enron was a major participant and which we= knew going into the proceedings at the start that our representation would= be adverse to Enron. As Rick may have told you, there have been some situations where we have be= en adverse to the Company or at least representing clients that did not see= "eye to eye" with Enron on all of the issues. These generally have been s= ituations involving historical client relationships that go back decades wh= ere Enron has itself been using Bracewell, for example, and Rick has been i= ncredibly gracious and understanding in not conflicting us out of those pro= ceedings. Nonetheless, I am trying to do whatever I can to try to eliminat= e or reduce the number of those situations on a going forward basis, althou= gh I know I will not be able to eliminate all of them in light of the size = of our Firm and the diverse nature of its client base. Jeff, I will follow up with you personally, but I just wanted to drop you a= quick note to thank you for the time and thought you devoted to this. I'=
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: Follow up
Tracy, Have you had a chance to evaluate your resource needs for the month of October. Currently, I am showing both Riaz and Hoang reserved for ETS the first three weeks of October. I am anticipating we will need to focus on the following items in October: Upgrade to Contributor V 2.2 Completion of home office model Completion of administration and consolidation items Final migration to production Northern Border Balance Sheet/Cash Flow I also wanted to know if you can possibly spare Hoang for two days the week of 10/8. Please advise. Thanks.
Answer: Adaytum Schedule for October
Q: Welcome to enerfax.comEnter Here | Free Domain Name Registration and Free Domain Name Forwarding by YourNameFree.com - Register your domain name. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service .
Propose a subject line
A:
Enerfax Daily's free web version of gas & power prices and info Enerfax Daily (28).htm