Read the given text and if it has abusive content then indicate via "yes". Otherwise indicate via"no".
We consider the content to be abusive if it contains any of the following instances: (1) Identity Directed Abuse (e.g., Content which contains a negative statement made against an identity. An identity is a social category that relates to a fundamental aspect of individuals community, socio-demographics, position or self-representation) (2) Affiliation Directed Abuse (e.g., Content which express negativity against an affiliation. We define affiliation as a (more or less) voluntary association with a collective. Affiliations include but are not limited to: memberships (e.g. Trade unions), party memberships (e.g. Republicans), political affiliations (e.g. Right-wing people) and occupations (e.g. Doctors).) (3) Person Directed Abuse (e.g., Content which directs negativity against an identifiable person, who is either part of the conversation thread or is named. Person-directed abuse includes serious character based attacks, such as accusing the person of lying, as well as aggression, insults and menacing language.) and (4) Counter Speech (e.g., Content which challenges, condemns or calls out the abusive language of others.). Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

[EX Q]: He used to live in a one room set in my neighborhood during his struggling days. Never met him but saw him leaving and entering the house many times. That time no one could guess that he would be such a success. For the whole neighborhood, he was just another Punjabi singer.
[EX A]: no

[EX Q]: Cat's a twink, and under 5,7. Not gay, but still beastiality. Only 1/2 as bad now. Still bad. Buy dom chad cat to wreck twink cat.
[EX A]: yes

[EX Q]: This is because the Cal Poly administration said "no, we're not getting rid of Chick-fil-a" on campus. It is one of the most profitable chick-fil-a's in the country as well. It's one of 52 chick-fil-a's to make over 2 million in a single year. > LGBTQI students- I see you and I am so sorry. It is a really difficult time for underrepresented students on the whitest, straightest campus in the CSU. I hope that in this broad conversation the LGBTQI students, faculty, and staff are heard out. Since the Morrill Act (1862, 1890) public universities are meant to represent the people and demographics that they serve. It is difficult work for us to evolve, so I know that ridicule and condescension come from a place of discomfort. That's to be expected. My advice is to prepare for change. Here's another totally hyperbolic comment from another user > There's a difference between companies/founders of companies speaking their opinions, and them actively donating to anti-human rights causes, and advocate torture and social exile for a specific group of people. So kindly fuck off This is my ~~alumnus~~ Alma mater unfortunately. Edit: wrong words EDIT 2: clarified the second quote was not from the same user.
[EX A]:
no