In this task, you will be presented with a context from an academic paper and you have to write an answerable question based on the context. Your questions can be extractive, abstractive, or yes-no questions.

Ex Input:
The clinical notes we used for the experiment are provided by domain experts, consisting of 1,160 physician logs of Medical ICU admission requests at a tertiary care center affiliated to Mount Sanai. The enriched corpus contains 42,506 Wikipedia articles, each of which corresponds to one candidate, 6 research papers and 2 critical care medicine textbooks, besides our raw ICU data.

Ex Output:
Which dataset do they use to build their model?

Ex Input:
The two main data sets that we will use to evaluate our architecture are the 2014 i2b2 de-identification challenge data set BIBREF2 and the nursing notes corpus BIBREF3 .

Ex Output:
Which two datasets is the system tested on?

Ex Input:
n this section, we first describe the phenomenon of mention of political parties names in the profile attributes of users. This is followed by the analysis of profiles that make specific mentions of political handles in their profile attributes. Both of these constitute an organic way of showing support to a party and does not involve any direct campaigning by the parties We opine that the whole campaign of adding Chowkidar to the profile attributes show an inorganic behavior, with political leaders acting as the catalyst. We believe, the effect of changing the profile attribute in accordance with Prime Minister's campaign is an example of inorganic behavior contagion BIBREF6, BIBREF9. However, we argue that the addition of election campaign related keywords to the profile is a form of inorganic behavior.

Ex Output:
What are the organic and inorganic ways to show political affiliation through profile changes?