Question: Sentence A: Bauerstein!" exclaimed Cynthia.

Sentence B: Cynthia knew Bauerstein was going to be there

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question: Neither did he notice at a small dog, belonging emotionally and lawfully to an elegant female professor from the Department of Westernmostentatious European Polonisation, who sat reading a newspaper on a nearby bench.
The professor owned a cat and cactus.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Problem: Here is a premise:
a launch to say let's conserve more because he never said that

Here is a hypothesis:
He should have said we should conserve more

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Sentence 1: Marjorie, it's been a delight to correspond with you this week.

Sentence 2: I am so glad we are done talking, Marjorie.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: no

Question:
Despite These differences, two key characteristics were common to each of the (1) information security responsibilities had been clearly defined for the groups involved and (2) dedicated staff resources had been provided to carry out These responsibilities.

Does it follow that "There were dedicated staff for carrying out information security responsibilities."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
yes

Question:
Based on the premise "The media have recently paid a lot of attention to research on other kinds of self-protection, most notably the work of John Lott and David Mustard on concealed handguns.", can we conclude that "The media has been interested in self-protection research."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
yes