In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence can be inferred from the statement. Incorrect choices change the meaning in important ways or have details that are not mentioned in the statement. Indicate your answer as 1,2, or 3 corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

Example Input: Statement: More than that, we are witnessing not the end of history but the resumption of history. Choices: 1. History is resuming right now. 2. History is ending right now. 3. History is being made right as we speak.
Example Output: 1

Example Input: Statement: In one of them, a congressional hearing on the minimum wage becomes an attack ad as Rep. Choices: 1. The congressional hearing on minimum wage was a peaceful event. 2. There was a congressional hearing about the minimum wage. 3. There was much disagreement at the hearing.
Example Output: 2

Example Input: Statement: When you talk to euro enthusiasts, they invariably claim that one of the great benefits of the new currency will be price transparency. Choices: 1. Euro enthusiasts claim that euro implies more richness. 2. Euro enthusiasts claim that euro implies price transparency. 3. Euro enthusiasts claim that euro implies price transparency, and they are right about it.
Example Output:
2