Sentence 1: This, of course, is not a very satisfactory state of affairs for theoretical economists--or, for that matter, policy-makers or speech writers.

Sentence 2: Policy makers would not be satisfied with this arrangement.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: yes

Question:
Somebody ought to be keeping an eye on the fellow.

Does it follow that "Somebody should keep an eye on him. "?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
yes

Q: If Return soon., can we say that "Come back soon."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A: yes

Premise:
"Muller's men probably, he thought."
Hypothesis: He thought that they were Muller's men.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

yes

input question: In particular, to prevent the reoccurrence of energy shortages and price volatility, a diverse mix of fuel sources should be maintained. If this premise is true, does that tell us:"Using different fuel sources will stop energy shortages."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: yes

Q: If yeah and so i've uh prior to that i uh i worked in a food store, can we say that "I loved eating everything in the food store."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A:
it is not possible to tell