Question:
Based on the premise "I wish we could have spared you the pain and publicity of an inquest, but of course it's quite unavoidable in the absence of a doctor's certificate.", can we conclude that "An inquest was not necessary."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
no

Question: Sentence A: Pau is famous for its views of the Pyrenees and as the birthplace of Henri IV, in 1553.

Sentence B: Henri IV was born in a place where the Pyrenees is not visible.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question: 'You're the closest thing we have to bait.'
We don't have bait, so we will have to use your scent.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Problem: Here is a premise:
The Commission held hearings (1) Duke University Law School, Durham, North Carolina on March 27, 1999; and (2) Stanford University, Stanford, California on April 10, 1999.

Here is a hypothesis:
The Commission held two separate hearings at different times and places but the same year.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Sentence 1: The B5289 road, which runs south from Keswick along the eastern shore of Derwent Water, leads you to some of the best gems of the Lake District.

Sentence 2: The best gems are down the eastern shore.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: yes

Premise:
"What the next form will be depends on the sum of a person's actions in his previous life, his karma."
Hypothesis: The next form a person will take depends on their actions and karma.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
yes