Generate an explanation for the given claim using the provided supporting material from the paragraph. Please consider the following points while generating an output. 1) The claim will always have supporting proof in the paragraph, and the paragraph will have a clear point of view supporting the claim. 2) There can be instances where direct correlation to the claim is not available. Make use of the sentences in the paragraph to provide a corresponding output supporting the claim. 3) The explanation should be at least one and at most twelve sentences long.

[Q]: Paragraph: Not applicable. The cost of olive oil is not in question. This story did the best job of the three stories we reviewed in quantifying the potential benefits observed in the study. "Over the next five to six years, those intensive users suffered strokes at a rate of 0.3 percent per year. That compared with just over 0.5 percent among non-users, and 0.4 percent among moderate users. When the researchers factored in other diet habits, exercise levels and major risk factors for stroke like high blood pressure and diabetes heavy olive oil use was tied to 41 percent reduction in the odds of stroke." There are better ways to try to communicate numbers of less than one percent. But we applaud the detail provided. Not applicable. Excellent. The story devoted almost 200 words to the potential limitations of such an observational study. Also a clear description of the cohort design. No disease-mongering of stroke in the story. The story included strong input from a researcher who wrote in an editorial on the study. The story at least mentioned other factors that could be at play "no single food is consumed in isolation, he points out in his editorial. Olive oil is one part of the Mediterranean diet that has been tied to heart benefits. The diet also boasts plenty of fruits and vegetables, legumes, whole grains, fish and moderate amounts of red wine." Not applicable. The availability of olive oil is not in question. The story attempted to put the new finding into the context of past research on olive oil and the Mediterranean diet. It's clear the story did not rely on a news release. Claim: Olive oil lovers show lower stroke risk
[A]: This story explored the nature of an observational study about the stroke-reducing risks of olive oil. The story appropriately discussed other possible reasons for the findings and why a clinical trial is stronger evidence. With so much news coverage touting an apparent benefit from olive oil in this study (CBS had a headline about "huge decline in stroke risk"), it is refreshing to see so much time and space given to a clear-eyed evaluation of the evidence as this story provided.

[Q]: Paragraph: Bryant's action came despite a federal judge's ruling last year that struck down a less-restrictive law limiting abortions in the state. The New York-based Center for Reproductive Rights called the new measure "cruel and clearly unconstitutional" and said it would sue Mississippi to try to block the law from taking effect on July 1. After a bill signing ceremony at the state Capitol, Bryant told reporters that he's not worried about lawsuits. "They don't have to sue us. It's up to them," Bryant said. "If they do not believe in the sanctity of life, these that are in organizations like Planned Parenthood, we will have to fight that fight. But it is worth it." Mississippi is one of several states that have considered bills this year to ban abortions once a fetal heartbeat is found. Abortion opponents are emboldened by new conservatives on the Supreme Court and are seeking cases to challenge Roe v. Wade, the court's 1973 ruling that legalized abortion nationwide. A federal judge in 2018 struck down a Mississippi law that would ban most abortions after 15 weeks of pregnancy, saying it is unconstitutional. The ruling came in a lawsuit filed by the only remaining abortion clinic in Mississippi. "Lawmakers didn't get the message," Hillary Schneller, staff attorney for the Center for Reproductive Rights, said in a statement Thursday. "They are determined to rob Mississippians of the right to abortion, and they are doing it at the expense of women's health and taxpayer money. This ban just like the 15-week ban the governor signed a year ago is cruel and clearly unconstitutional." The law that Bryant signed Thursday says a physician who performs an abortion after a fetal heartbeat is detected could face revocation of his or her Mississippi medical license. It also says abortions could be allowed after a fetal heartbeat is found if a pregnancy endangers a woman's life or one of her major bodily functions. The House and Senate both rejected efforts to allow exceptions for pregnancies caused by rape or incest. Georgia and Tennessee are among the states considering similar bills. Kentucky's law banning abortion after the detection of a heartbeat was immediately challenged by the American Civil Liberties Union when Republican Gov. Matt Bevin signed it on March 14, and a federal judge temporarily blocked it. A federal judge on Wednesday also blocked another Kentucky law that would ban abortion for women seeking to end their pregnancies because of the gender, race or disability of the fetus. Dr. Leana Wen, a physician who is president of Planned Parenthood Federation of America, said in a statement Thursday that the new Mississippi law "is a dangerous policy that criminalizes a safe, standard medical procedure and will endanger women's lives." "Patients must be empowered to make their own health care decisions, in consultation with their doctor and their family, and doctors must be able to provide health care to our patients without the threat of prison time," Wen said. "We cannot accept a world where the right to abortion care depends on where you live or how much money you make." Jameson Taylor, vice president for policy at the conservative Mississippi Center for Public Policy, praised Bryant for signing the bill. "The heartbeat bill is popular because everyone knows a heartbeat is a sign of life," Taylor said in a statement. "Intellectual and scientific honesty demands a reconsideration of Roe, a 50-year-old decision based on old science. 3-D and 4-D ultrasounds are showing women that their unborn child is alive." ____ Follow Emily Wagster Pettus on Twitter at http://twitter.com/EWagsterPettus . Claim: Mississippi governor signs 'heartbeat' abortion law.
[A]: Mississippi Gov. Phil Bryant on Thursday signed one of the strictest abortion laws in the nation a measure that bans most abortions once a fetal heartbeat can be detected, about six weeks into pregnancy.

[Q]: Paragraph: On July 29 2020, an apparent CNN screen capture featuring a chyron quoting United States President Donald Trump as saying "nobody likes me" circulated on sites like Reddit:Does this count? from facepalmTrump: 'Nobody likes me' from politicsThe ChyronIn the first of the two Reddit posts above, shared to r/facepalm, a "Breaking News" chyron timestamped at 4:06 PM Pacific read:TRUMP AS U.S. NEARS 150,000 DEATHS: "NOBODY LIKES ME"However, the image didn't link to any additional information about whether Trump said "nobody likes me," or in which context he might have done so.C-SPAN Video and Trump's Response to a ReporterC-SPAN published video on July 28 2020 with the description, "President Trump Coronavirus News Conference."In the 26-minute and 36-second clip below, Trump took questions from reporters about COVID-19 and sub-topics (such as controversy over a Facebook video touting the disputed safety and efficacy of hydroxychloroquine). After praising the controversial video, Trump calls on a reporter to take a question. The reporter asks about a statement by Trump made about Dr. Anthony Fauci and hydroxycloroquine, in the form of retweeting material later flagged by Twitter: last night [on July 27 2020] in tweets that were deleted by Twitter, you said Dr. Fauci misled the country on hydroxychloroquine how so?In response, Trump rambles at length about Fauci, hydroxychloroquine, Dr. Deborah Birx, his belief that the drug failed to catch on as a COVID-19 treatment due to his support of it, and generalized approval ratings:No, not at all. I think I don't even know what [Fauci's] stance is on it. I was just you know, he was at the he was at the task force meeting a little while ago.I have a very good relationship with Dr. Fauci. You know, it's sort of interesting we've listened to Dr. Fauci I haven't always agreed with him, and it's I think, pretty standard. That's okay. He did not want us to ban [stammers] put up the ban to China, when China was heavily infected very badly, Wuhan. He didn't want to do that, and I did and other things.And [Fauci] told me I was right, and he told me I saved tens of thousands of lives, which was generous, but it's you know, I think it's fact that I banned I did the ban on Europe. But I get along with him very well and I agree with a lot of what he's said so, you know, it's interesting. He's got a very good approval rating, and I like that. It's good. Because remember, he's working for this administration. He's working with us, John. We could have gotten other people. We could have gotten somebody else. It didn't have to be Dr. Fauci. He's working with our administration, and for the most part, we've done pretty much what he and others Dr. Birx and others, who are terrific recommended.And he's got this high approval rating, so why don't I have a high approval rating with respect and the administration, with respect to the virus? We should have a very high because what we've done in terms of we're just reading off about the masks and the gowns and the ventilators and numbers that nobody has seen, and the testing at 55 million tests, we tested more than anybody in the world. I have a graph that I'd love to show you perhaps you've seen it where we're up here [gestures] and the rest of the world is down at a level that's just a tiny fraction of what we've done in terms of testing.So it sort of is curious A man works for us, with us very closely Dr. Fauci, and Dr. [Deborah] Birx, also highly thought of and yet, they're highly thought of, but nobody likes me. It can only be my personality. That's all. Go ahead.In the broader context of the video, Trump addressed myriad topics in response to a reporter's question about whether he believed Dr. Fauci "misled the country on hydroxychloroquine." Trump maintained he had "a very good relationship" with Fauci, that Fauci said Trump "saved tens of thousands of lives," and added that he has not "always agreed" with Fauci.Subsequently, Trump mused that Fauci (and Birx) had a "very good approval rating," asking, apparently rhetorically, why he and his administration did not appear to enjoy the same level of approval referencing "the masks and the gowns and the ventilators and numbers that nobody has seen."As he wrapped up his response, Trump described it as "curious " that Fauci and Birx were "highly thought of," and added that "nobody likes me."TL;DRA chyron reading "TRUMP AS U.S. NEARS 150,000 DEATHS: "NOBODY LIKES ME" circulated on social media, often without much context about the veracity or substance of the quote. On July 28 2020, Trump provided a response at length to a reporter during a coronavirus news conference, covering a range of topics before addressing the popularity of Fauci. At the end of the answer, Trump made the remark before moving on.According to the Kaiser Family Foundation, a nonprofit organization focusing on public and national health issues throughout the United States, the official American death toll due to COVID-19 as of the end of July 28 2020 was 149,033.Comments Claim: "On July 28 2020, United States President Donald Trump lamented that doctors Anthony Fauci and Deborah Birx were popular for their coronavirus response, but ""nobody likes me."
[A]:
A chyron reading "TRUMP AS U.S. NEARS 150,000 DEATHS: "NOBODY LIKES ME" circulated on social media, often without much context about the veracity or substance of the quote. On July 28 2020, Trump provided a response at length to a reporter during a coronavirus news conference, covering a range of topics before addressing the popularity of Fauci. At the end of the answer, Trump made the remark before moving on.According to the Kaiser Family Foundation, a nonprofit organization focusing on public and national health issues throughout the United States, the official American death toll due to COVID-19 as of the end of July 28 2020 was 149,033.