The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.

[EX Q]: Context: 'I am going camping too. May I ask where you are going canoe camping?' 'We are going to camp in Oregon. We are looking forward to it. The views and scenery should be gorgeous. How about you?' 'I am going to the Allegheny mountains in Pennsylvania. I'm going to be hiking a lot so I will need some extra food. Let's balance out the food and water somehow....'
Utterance: 'Sounds good. We will also be hiking a bunch and I have little kids who go through water and food like crazy.'
[EX A]: Yes

[EX Q]: Context: 'yes I could use some extra food since i am hiking with my kids and they all have a friend that comes along...lol' 'I know how that goes...We are planning on hiking too and we could also use some extra food.' 'well I am sure between you and me we will find a way....'
Utterance: 'I really need some food, but I could also use extra firewood. It is supposed to be pretty cold at night and we would love to cook up some smores.'
[EX A]: Yes

[EX Q]: Context: 'Oh, I see what you did there. No problem I have plenty of firewood for you buddy. 🙂' 'Great! What extra supplies would you like to bring?' 'Since it's hot there, I get thirsty and dry real quick. 😡'
Utterance: 'Oh ok, well I plan on bringing some juice, beer and other drinks. So I could spare some extra water. And I am pretty good at fishing, so I won't need much food either'
[EX A]:
No