Question: Sentence A: , Serbian) government denied responsibility (claiming the victims were rebel fighters) and ordered the diplomat to leave Yugoslavia.

Sentence B: The Serbian government denied any responsibility.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Question: As for the statement relating to the destruction of the will, the prisoner had formerly practiced at the Bar, and was perfectly well aware that the will made in his favour a year before was automatically revoked by his stepmother's remarriage.
The prisoner knew that the will made in his favour the prior year was revoked when his stepmother remarried.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Problem: Here is a premise:
You couldn't possibly have published a better parody of what passes for scholarship in the postmodern world.

Here is a hypothesis:
This is a parody of what passes for obtaining a scholarship in the postmodern world.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Sentence 1: Can you raise the wind for us now?" "Hold on." Bork's voice seemed sure of itself.

Sentence 2: Bork's voice was uncertain and cautious.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: no

Question:
Nor will community development help be sacrificed.

Does it follow that "Community development assistance will not be sacrificed. "?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
yes

Question:
Based on the premise "Thus far, we have examined carrier time per possible delivery or per box.", can we conclude that "They have examined carrier time per possible delivery of wild animal."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
it is not possible to tell