Question:
Based on the premise "Since the standard appears to constitute a federal mandate resulting in aggregate annual private sector expenditures of $100 million or more, it would be subject to the requirements of section 202 of the Act (Statements to Accompany Significant Regulatory Actions).", can we conclude that "The proposal is subject to the 202 section of the Act since it spends more than 100 million. "?
****
Answer:
yes

Question:
Based on the premise "no no and uh what let's see uh the most recent ones that i've seen are those two Ghost and uh Dances With Wolves but i rent uh uh videos do you", can we conclude that "I buy movies, I don't rent them."?
****
Answer:
no

Question:
Based on the premise "um boy that is that is good", can we conclude that "Yeah,it's good that he's graduating on time. "?
****
Answer:
it is not possible to tell