input question: The GOP is reluctant to challenge the law's tyranny. If this premise is true, does that tell us:"The GOP is unwilling to contest the oppression of the law."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: yes

Question:
Based on the premise "'Just the three of us.' I was already running for the front of the train.", can we conclude that "They wanted to ask the conductor when they would get to their destination."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
it is not possible to tell

Question: Sentence A: But the racism charge isn't quirky or wacky--it's demagogy.

Sentence B: The racist charge is both quirky and wacky.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question: 130 "No," admitted Boris at last sullenly, "you do not."
Boris confidently objected, a smile breaking out across his face.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Problem: Here is a premise:
but um yeah but she will she almost refuses you know to do that in fact we're at a point now where if we do a salad bar at the grocery store

Here is a hypothesis:
She usually says she won't do that.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Question:
No legal charges were brought.

Does it follow that "It didn't bring legal charges."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
yes