Question: And that was a very interesting ploy on Meet the Press .
That was a boring ploy on meet the press.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Problem: Here is a premise:
i'd encourage it

Here is a hypothesis:
I would support it, but I know you're angry

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Sentence 1: Perhaps the uncritical reportage of Fitzsimmons' new story can be explained by pangs of guilt about the uncritical reportage of his old one.

Sentence 2: Perhaps the reportage of Fitzsimmon's story can be explained by guilt regarding his old story and his past history.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question:
Time 's explanation of the science of toxic weapons trumps Newsweek 's.

Does it follow that "Time had a better explanation on toxic weapon science than Newsweek. "?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
yes

Q: If McNary, published in the Harvard Human Rights Journal in 1993., can we say that "McNary has never been published in a journal."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A: no

Question: uh-huh right and and they've changed that now now stop it go play and leave me alone yeah and so i'm using the other ones now because they're just as easy to get to and then they're nickel a gallon cheaper so
The other ones give a nickel per gallon discount.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer:
yes