We have 125 years of history of this Court making sure that the limits, both express and implied, in the Copyright Clause, have some meaning. The Feist opinion very clearly sets out the implied limits, a per se limit for originality, for the reasons Justice Breyer was trying to get me to say.

Can we draw the following conclusion?
The Copyright Clause is not being upheld

Select from the following.
(A). Yes;
(B). It's impossible to say;
(C). No;
(B).