In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Q: Comment: emotional support animal? what's wrong with the word "pet?"

horseshit.

A: Obscene
****
Q: Comment: WHO GIVES A FUCK

A: Obscene
****
Q: Comment: What a bunch of crap. This author clearly supports Jihadis. There is so much false information in this article that it is astounding. So lets break down the outright misinformation provided by this author.

1)There are no moderate rebels in syria. Can you provide ONE example of where territory has been taken over by these rebels that has resulted in any elements of democracy?
2) All of these rebels are already closely aligned to Alqueda and ISIS, including the FSA, where they are seen on camera calling them their brothers
3)The gulf states have the same ideology as ISIS and Alqueda. These are your 'sunnis' that you are protecting. Hillary has already admitted that we know KSA and Qatar fund ISIS in the region. You support these sunnis, but in Syira, and Iran anyone is free to practice their religion. How many churches are in KSA? Thats right, 0
4) Most importantly, the overwhemingly majority of Syria supports Assad. Most of Assads army is made of sunnis. So the rebels are jihadis

A:
Obscene
****