Here is an email: Mike & Sally, Below is the information that we received on the project. I am still waiting on a cost center from EES for the expense portions to settle to. Look over this information and let me know if you still want to meet to go over this. This is the EES project, which is set up on EES to capture the capital portion of the project costs. The expense portion should settle to an EES cost center. The project set up shown below is the Networks project, which I set up, but have not yet released. Only Release 1 is shown below. There are three releases set up, but only the first one will be released at this time. All three releases or phases will look like the other phases. As you can see below, the capital parts of the project (Solution Definition, Design & Build, and Implementation & Testing) are set up with three basic WBS elements. These elements as described below will settle to the EES project as follows. Project Coding on Networks Project Settles to EES Project WBS C.300000.01.SD.OU Rel 1 SD Outside Consultants Labor C.007730.22.01 Outside Professional C.300000.01.SD.EN Rel 1 SD Enron Labor C.007730.22.03 Enron Labor C.300000.01.SD.OE Rel 1 SD Other Expenditures C.007730.22.05 Other Expenditure C.300000.01.HW Hardware Purchases C.007730.24.01 Hardware C.300000.01.SW Software Purchases C.007730.24.02 Software This will allow the costs on the Networks project to be tracked in a manor that will support how the charges are settling to EES. So if EES has any questions about the charges we should be able to pull up the detail very quickly. The following items will settle to an EES cost center since they are expense related. C.300000.01.PI.TR Rel 1 PI Training Dev & Delivery C.300000.01.PI.PI Rel 1 PI Post Implementation Support C.300000.01.PI.GA Rel 1 PI General & Administrative
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: Genesys or now the Liberty Project
Here is an email: When: Tuesday, January 22, 2002 2:30 PM-3:00 PM (GMT-06:00) Central Time (US & Canada). Where: EB3941 Denis' office *~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~* Please pass the word. I invited the first names that popped into my head.
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: SURPIRSE - Denis Tu Birthday
Here is an email: Dear Mike and John, Not sure to which of you I should have addressed this email since you are both listed as doing liquid fuels. If I am wrong and it is neither of you would be really grateful if you could pass this email to the right EGM lawyer ASAP (with a copy to me so I know with whom to follow up). I am attaching a number of documents. (i) The first is an internal memo re two new products Enron Japan wants to put on EOL. The Enron CP will be ENA which is why I need your help before going to Mark. The memo describes the product generally and how it will work (and sets out the background as to why EJ is pushing this initiative). This is FYI only. (ii) & (iii) These are the draft product descriptions and GTCs and we need ENA legal sign off re same. If you are happy with these then I will pass to Mark Taylor for final approval. If you have any questions, please let me know. We are hoping to get this approved by Wednesday Tokyo time so if this needs to be passed on, I would be grateful if you could do this today (your time). RE product Descriptions - in addition to those changes which were needed to reflect the fact that the products are in yen and KL (and not in USD and Barrels) , we have used upper case for Business Days (because it is defined in the GTCs and the definition is important because it will not refer to Japanese holidays) and I have incorporated a new definition "the relevant Scheduled Trading Date" so that in accordance with what I understand to be standard EOL procedure, the top half of the product description can be the same for both products (despite the fact that the currency exchange will be done 3 days after a different date in the case of the two definitions) and only the bottom half will need to change. I have actually only made one small change to the GTCs, to provide for kiloliters in the rounding off clause. I assume that given that NY law will apply, that we don't usually amend the arbitration clause in the case of products likely to be purchased by non-US counter parties. I am less sure about the events of default clause. The language seems pretty short and generic so I suspect that we probably don't put CP jurisdiction specific events in but please confirm. ********************* Please leave me a message or send me an email if you want me to call you Monday evening your time. Thanks very much for your help..
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A:
EOL - new Product - JPY / KL WTI Swap