Given a passage, construct a question on the basis of the information present in the passage. Construct the question in such a way that (i) it is unambiguous, (ii) it is answerable from the passage, (iii) its answer is unique (iv) it answer uses text phrases from the passage. Avoid creating questions that (i) can't be answered correctly without actually understanding the passage and (ii) uses the same words or phrases given in the passage.

Example Input: To study the long-term effects of selegiline in monotherapy and in combination with levodopa in the early phase of Parkinson disease (PD).', "One hundred fifty-seven de novo PD patients were randomized in a double-blind, placebo-controlled study of 7 years' duration. In the monotherapy part, selegiline significantly delayed the initiation of levodopa therapy vs placebo. The authors now report the results from the combination part of the study, in which 140 patients received selegiline or placebo in addition to individually tailored levodopa therapy.", 'Compared with placebo, selegiline slowed the progression of disease disability as measured by the Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) total score (p = 0.003) or by motor (p = 0.002) and Activities of Daily Living (p = 0.0002) subscores. After 5 years in combination therapy, the mean difference in the UPDRS total score was nearly 10 points, with patients receiving placebo having 35% higher scores. Simultaneously, patients receiving placebo needed progressively higher doses of levodopa than patients receiving selegiline; after 5 years, the mean dosage of levodopa was 19% higher with placebo than with selegiline (p = 0.0002). Considering the entire (monotherapy and combination therapy) 7-year study time, there was a trend for selegiline to delay the start of wearing-off fluctuations (hazard ratio 0.55, p = 0.08). In both phases of the study, selegiline was safe and well tolerated.
Example Output: Does selegiline slow the progression of the symptoms of Parkinson disease?

Example Input: GM-CSF has broad clinical applicability as a potent myelopoietic stimulator. However, its function is not restricted to the myelopoietic system and several observations suggest that GM-CSF may interfere with the hemostatic balance. In order to assess whether GM-CSF has any influence on hemostasis, we evaluated some coagulative and fibrinolytic parameters in patients treated with GM-CSF following chemotherapy.', 'Fibrinolytic activity (FA), fibrinogen and D-dimer were evaluated before and after high-dose cyclophosphamide in 6 patients additionally treated with GM-CSF and in 5 control patients; moreover, tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) was assayed in those treated with GM-CSF. Comparative in vitro analysis was performed on cultured endothelial cells before and after exposure to GM-CSF.', 'Control patients showed a significant decrease in plasma FA after chemotherapy compared to basal values (FA/mm2: 15.6 +/- 2.1 at day + 2 and 20.8 +/- 19 at day + 4 vs. 103.8 +/- 64.2 at day 0; p < 0.005); conversely, no FA reduction was observed in GM-CSF-treated subjects. In this latter group a marked increase in tPA antigen was seen, consistent with enhanced FA. No significant changes in plasma D-dimer and fibrinogen values were detected in the two groups. tPA, urokinase-type plasminogen activator, PAI-1 and procoagulant activity were evaluated in vitro on cultured human endothelial cells and found to be unchanged following GM-CSF addition.
Example Output: Is reduction of plasma fibrinolytic activity following high-dose cyclophosphamide neutralized in vivo by GM-CSF administration?

Example Input: Barrett esophagus (BE) is considered precursor condition of esophageal adenocarcinoma. Its incidence and prevalence are increasing in general population. Studies reported that metabolic syndrome (MS) or diabetes mellitus (DM) is related to increased risk of BE. Current study was to assess and better understand the relationship between MS /DM and BE.', "Electronic search was conducted in the database Pubmed/Medline (-December, 2015), Embase (-December, 2015), Cochrane Library (-December, 2015), and Web of Knowledge (-December, 2015). Studies included were assessed with summary odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and compared exposure group with control group. The heterogeneity was examined by the funnel plot and the Egger's test. Subgroup analyses and sensitive analyses were performed for the detection of possible heterogeneity and impact on stability of analysis results.", "Twelve publications met the criteria and included 355,311 subjects were analyzed. The pooled results showed MS was closely associated with increased risk of BE (OR=1.23; 95%CI 1.03-1.47; P=0.024), and yet DM did not significantly increase the risk of BE (OR=1.07; 95%CI 0.82-1.38; P=0.627). Substantial heterogeneities were detected. No significant publication bias was detected by Egger's test (P=0.23).
Example Output:
Is metabolic syndrome associated with increased risk of Barrett esophagus : A meta-analysis?