Generate a context and a hypothesis.

Answer: Context: Kansas City Chiefs tight end Travis Kelce turned some heads Sunday when he trashed the officials after the Chiefs' 18-16 loss to the Pittsburgh Steelers. Kelce said the official who threw a flag against Chiefs left tackle Eric Fisher a penalty that negated what would have been the tying 2-point conversion "shouldn't be able to work at Foot Locker." Well, Foot Locker got wind of the tirade and tried to change Kelce's opinion of the sneaker store. Foot Locker's response begs the question: Will anyone come to the defense of the refs?

Hypothesis: Kansas City Chiefs have a poor record this season

Generate a context and a hypothesis.

Answer: Context: Pamela C. Ronald (born 1961) is an American plant pathologist and geneticist. She is a professor in the Genome Center and the Department of Plant Pathology, and founding faculty director of the Institute for Food and Agricultural Literacy (IFAL), all at the University of California, Davis. She also serves as Director of Grass Genetics at the Joint BioEnergy Institute in Emeryville, California.

Hypothesis: Grass Genetics started off as a hobby for Pamela.

Generate a context and a hypothesis.

Answer: Context: Local Law enforcement officials acting on behalf of the European Commission raided offices of Intel and several computer makers this morning, a spokesman for the EU said. He did not specify which countries or which other firms were involved. However, a spokesman for Intel Germany, Hans-Jurgen Werner, said that Intel's offices in Munich and Swindon were among those searched. It emerged on Wednesday 13th, that raids also took place at Intel's facility in County Kildare, Ireland in relation to the firms anti-competitive business practices. Intel employs over 5,000 people at its Irish manufacturing facility.

Hypothesis: this morning they were making computers

Generate a context and a hypothesis.

Answer:
Context: Well, let me share with you why I have the issue that I have. About a week and a half ago I had a telephone dialogue with Eric because I had proposed to Eric the possibility that in light of your most current order and because you took out the issues of biases and things of that nature and because we're going to be called to trial by Eric, that maybe he should be speaking to Pat to see whether they would be willing to accept the affidavit in lieu of the testimony.

Hypothesis: Eric is a scam artist looking to make a quick buck