Question: Sentence A: The valley between Temple Mount and the Mount of Olives holds traces left by Jerusalem's earliest inhabitants.

Sentence B: Pottery pieces and bones have shown Jerusalem's early inhabitants.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question: The museum will surprise many visitors expecting a victim's account of one of this century's most controversial decisions; yet the curators have gone to considerable lengths to document the horror of atomic weapons and nuclear war in general, driving toward the inevitable conclusion that such weapons must never again be used.
The document contains details about how atomic weapons are made.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Problem: Here is a premise:
yeah that that's that's the part that i don't like too

Here is a hypothesis:
No, I don't agree, I love this part!

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Sentence 1: Suddenly Boris stepped forward, and shook his fist in Tommy's face.

Sentence 2: Suddenly, Boris moved forward, and threatened to hit Tommy in the face.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question:
Haven't I always hated him like poison?"

Does it follow that "He's one of my best friends."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
no

Question:
Based on the premise "And what about Rupaul?", can we conclude that "Can Rupaul be included?"? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
yes