Question:
Based on the premise "It gives an overview of Macau's history and its daily life and traditions.", can we conclude that "Macau does not have many traditions. "? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
no

Question: Sentence A: Greuze was opposite me, drinking from a bottle of Champaign.

Sentence B: Greuze was across from me.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Question: It's all there--his terrible work ethic, his drug use, his obsession with the mob of the distant past, the mafia of his fantasies (of course he's writing a screenplay, and of course he can't spell).
Some of it exists - His alcohol abuse and his yakuza fantasies.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Problem: Here is a premise:
Western countries and Nigerian opposition leaders implored the military to use Abacha's death as an opportunity to restore civilian democracy.

Here is a hypothesis:
Eastern countries and Canadian opposition leaders saw an opportunity to restore democracy.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Sentence 1: uh-huh oh Cinema Para De Simo oh okay because you're saying it with a you're saying it little Italian oh are you Italian oh okay that's why go ahead

Sentence 2: I never knew you were Italian until my sister told me, that's why you were saying Cinema Para De Simo like an Italian.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Premise:
"If the speed limit is 55 mph, off-duty highway cops should drive at 55, even if 62 or 63 is close enough for the rest of us."
Hypothesis: Police officers ought to obey traffic laws, even if the rest of us don't.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
yes