In this task, you are given a passage which has a question and the context. You have to generate an answer to the question based on the information present in the context.

Q: Context: Natural disasters expose entire communities to stress and trauma, leading to increased risk for psychiatric symptoms. Yet, the majority of exposed individuals are resilient, highlighting the importance of identifying underlying factors that contribute to outcomes.', "The current study was part of a larger prospective study of children in Long Island, New York (n = 260). At age 9, children viewed unpleasant and pleasant images while the late positive potential (LPP), an event-related potential component that reflects sustained attention toward salient information, was measured. Following the event-related potential assessment, Hurricane Sandy, the second costliest hurricane in United States history, hit the region. Eight weeks after the hurricane, mothers reported on exposure to hurricane-related stress and children's internalizing and externalizing symptoms. Symptoms were reassessed 8 months after the hurricane.", 'The LPP predicted both internalizing and externalizing symptoms after accounting for prehurricane symptomatology and interacted with stress to predict externalizing symptoms. Among children exposed to higher levels of hurricane-related stress, enhanced neural reactivity to unpleasant images predicted greater externalizing symptoms 8 weeks after the disaster, while greater neural reactivity to pleasant images predicted lower externalizing symptoms. Moreover, interactions between the LPP and stress continued to predict externalizing symptoms 8 months after the hurricane.\Question: Does neural Reactivity to Emotional Stimuli Prospectively predict the Impact of a Natural Disaster on Psychiatric Symptoms in Children?

A: Results indicate that heightened neural reactivity and attention toward unpleasant information, as measured by the LPP, predispose children to psychiatric symptoms when exposed to higher levels of stress related to natural disasters, while greater reactivity to and processing of pleasant information may be a protective factor.
****
Q: Context: Poor decision-making is a hallmark of addiction, whether to substances or activities. Performance on a widely used test of decision-making, the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT), can discriminate controls from persons with ventral medial frontal lesions, substance-dependence, and pathological gambling. Positron emission tomography (PET) studies indicate that substance-dependent individuals show altered prefrontal activity on the task. Here we adapted the IGT to an fMRI setting to test the hypothesis that defects in ventral medial and prefrontal processing are associated with impaired decisions that involve risk but may differ depending on whether substance dependence is comorbid with gambling problems.', '18 controls, 14 substance-dependent individuals (SD), and 16 SD with gambling problems (SDPG) underwent fMRI while performing a modified version of the IGT.', 'Group differences were observed in ventral medial frontal, right frontopolar, and superior frontal cortex during decision-making. Controls showed the greatest activity, followed by SDPG, followed by SD.\Question: Is prefrontal cortex activity reduced in gambling and nongambling substance users during decision-making?

A: Our results support a hypothesis that defects in ventral medial frontal processing lead to impaired decisions that involve risk. Reductions in right prefrontal activity during decision-making appear to be modulated by the presence of gambling problems and may reflect impaired working memory, stimulus reward valuation, or cue reactivity in substance-dependent individuals.
****
Q: Context: To determine the role of tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha) and Fas ligand (FasL, CD95L) in superantigen-induced and endotoxin-induced liver injury.', 'Gram-positive bacteria are increasingly common causes of sepsis and multiorgan failure, but the pathophysiologic mechanisms of superantigen-provoked hepatotoxicity remain elusive.', 'Intravital fluorescence microscopy was used to study the liver microcirculation in mice challenged with superantigen (staphylococcal enterotoxin A, SEA) or endotoxin (lipopolysaccharide, LPS) combined with D-galactosamine.', 'Administration of 10 microg LPS and 50 microg SEA caused similar hepatocellular damage as determined by liver enzymes and apoptosis. Notably, TNF-alpha-deficient mice were completely protected against hepatic injury provoked by LPS, whereas no protection was observed in response to SEA. On the other hand, FasL-deficient mice were protected against liver injury induced by SEA, but no protection was found when challenged with LPS. LPS increased clear-cut leukocyte recruitment, whereas SEA had no significant effect on leukocyte responses in the liver microcirculation. Leukocyte responses to LPS were decreased by >56% in TNF-alpha gene-targeted animals. Moreover, antiadhesive therapy, ie, immunoneutralization of P-selectin, which is an effective inhibitor of leukocyte recruitment, protected against LPS-induced but not against SEA-induced hepatic damage.\Question: Is staphylococcal enterotoxin A-induced hepatotoxicity predominantly mediated by Fas ligand ( CD95L )?

A:
These novel findings demonstrate that the mechanisms of hepatic injury in endotoxin-induced and superantigen-induced sepsis are principally different. On one hand, SEA-provoked hepatotoxicity is mediated by FasL and is not associated with leukocyte recruitment. On the other hand, liver damage provoked by LPS is mediated by TNF-alpha and characterized by prominent leukocyte responses. These data may facilitate development of more specific therapies against sepsis of different origins.
****