In this task, you will be shown a sentence, and you should determine whether it is overruling or non-overruling. In law, an overruling sentence is a statement that nullifies a previous case decision as a precedent by a constitutionally valid statute or a decision by the same or higher ranking court which establishes a different rule on the point of law involved. Classify your answers into overruling or non-overruling

Ex Input:
consequently, to the extent that miller or perez can still be read as authority for overlooking a party's failure to make a timely and specific objection to the admission of evidence at trial and subsequently preserve the issue for appellate review by including it in a 1925(b) statement to which the trial court responds, their rationale for overlooking waiver is disavowed.

Ex Output:
overruling

Ex Input:
schambach v. afford-a-pool & spa, 7th dist. no. 08 be 15, 2009-ohio-6809, 8, quoting juhasz v. costanzo, 144 ohio app.3d 756, 762, 761 n.e.2d 679 (7th dist.2001).

Ex Output:
non-overruling

Ex Input:
o the extent to which people v. kimbley (1961) 189 cal.app.2d 300 [ 11 cal.rptr. 519], and people v. berner (1938) 28 cal.app.2d 392 [ 82 p.2d 617], are inconsistent with the views expressed herein, they are disapproved.

Ex Output:
overruling