IN: This is an email
Everyone: Thanks are due to you all who responded to our requests for data and committed resources. I wanted to update you on where things stands as of now. The data is being reviewed both internally and externally. The form and substance of the data we have requested, the due diligence questionnaires, and Enron's previously produced forms of data are excellent proxies for the information that will be required from us when a specific bank is chosen to structure and execute the anticipated transaction. However, I am certain that we will still require your commitment to providing updates, clarifications, and additions on a timely basis. Please let us know as soon as possible what conflicts may arise with your schedules and obligations over the next month. Again, thank you for your efforts thus far. Please call me at extension 33139 if you have any questions, concerns, or suggestions.

What is the subject?

OUT: UPDATE
QUESTION: Greetings: This item will be up for discussion in the California negotiations tomorrow beginning at 10 AM. We're going to have a call to discuss it tomorrow from 9 AM to 9:30 AM PDT. You will receive a call-in number shortly from Joseph Alamo. If there are others who you think ought to participate, please feel free to invite them. Thanks. Best,
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: Call to Discuss Possible Options to Mitigate Effect of DWR Contracts--Privileged and Confidential
From the 12/11/01 New Dem Daily. Please let the Colorado DLC know what you think. This week the long, windy debate in Washington over a so-called economic stimulus package will likely be resolved one way or another. Putting aside all the partisan finger-pointing as to who is responsible for this or that twist or turn in the process, the bottom line is very clear: Republicans are unwilling to support any stimulus package that does not include significant new cuts in tax rates for wealthy individuals and corporations. We think that's too high a price to pay for the modest relief efforts for the unemployed that should be the focus of this legislation. The overall economy is not in as bad a shape as many feared at the beginning of this debate. Fiscal stimulus is already being supplied by new federal spending related to the war on terrorism and homeland defense. The tax rate cuts Republicans demand will in any event have no positive short-term impact on the economy, and could damage its long-range prospects by boosting future federal budget deficits. In effect, the GOP is holding unemployment relief hostage to yet another installment in its relentless drive for tax cuts targeted to high earners. It's time for Democrats to call the whole thing off, and call the Republicans' bluff on unemployment relief by decoupling it from tax rate cuts. Congress should be debating whether to cancel some of the high-end tax cuts enacted earlier this year, in order to pay for the war on terrorism. Instead, Congressional Republicans have spent months talking about new demands on public funds for the Americans who are least vulnerable in the economic slowdown, and least likely to make personal sacrifices in the war effort at home or abroad. If fiscal discipline means anything at all, it means a willingness to resist these sorts of demands. New Democrats favor bipartisan compromises in the pursuit of the national interest, but not in the pursuit of special interests. A deal with Republicans to secure new tax rate cuts would not be a compromise between "Left" and "Right," but between right and wrong.
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: The Stimulus Package: Too High A Price
well, how is it going down there? Charles ***************************************************************************** The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. When addressed to our clients any opinions or advice contained in this email are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client engagement letter. *****************************************************************************
Answer: note
Here is an email: Attention Outlook User: You are receiving this message to alert you that at 8:00 p.m. CST today the Exchange server that your mail file resides on will be taken down for maintenance for approximately one hour. During this outage, access to your Outlook client including email, calendar ,contacts and public folders will be unavailable. In addition, access to your email via OWA (Outlook Web Access) will also be unavailable. Messages intended for delivery will be queued and delivered once the server is back online. This preventive measure is taking place to ensure that some of the issues you may have experienced today with slowness will not continue to happen. We apologize for the late notice and appreciate your continued support. Thanks,
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: URGENT: Outlook Outage
QUESTION: When: Monday, February 04, 2002 1:30 PM-2:00 PM (GMT-06:00) Central Time (US & Canada). Where: ECS 06112 *~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~* Please accept this invitation, as it will automatically populate onto your calendars. Thank you,
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS:
Central Region Customer Priority Ranking