Question:
Based on the premise "or even Australia! ", can we conclude that "Or also Australia!"? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
yes

Question: Sentence A: Already the town gathered.

Sentence B: The town gathered together.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Question: Shannon was supposed to have ridden south on the Range, not north.
Shannon rode north because he was confused.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Problem: Here is a premise:
there was another uh angle that i i started seeing as uh the Polish situation and some of the Soviet uh countries as it were uh they started coming into the news and you started hearing about some of their troubles and the like and some of their their crime problems it made me wonder just how the uh outlook of the future affects people's decisions to either commit crimes or how they live or whatever uh it seems like they the poorer the situation or the poorer the outlook the more likely they are to commit a crime

Here is a hypothesis:
It seems that the richer the situation and the brighter the outlook, the more crime is likely to be committed.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Sentence 1: Lee Kemp, a hearing-impaired World War II disabled vet, also was evicted, but he contacted Utah Legal Services and was told to stay put.

Sentence 2: Lee Kamp is a disabled vet.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: yes

Premise:
"Currents can be surprisingly strong at the attractive Flamands beach not recommended for children or poor swimmers."
Hypothesis: Flamands beach has strong currents reserved for strong swimmers.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
yes