Given the task definition, example input & output, solve the new input case.
In this task, you are given text for US Congressional and California state bills, your task is to generate a summary for this bill.
Example: SECTION 1. LIABILITY OF BUSINESS ENTITIES PROVIDING USE OF FACILITIES
TO NONPROFIT ORGANIZATIONS.

(a) Definitions.--In this section:
(1) Business entity.--The term ''business entity'' means a
firm, corporation, association, partnership, consortium, joint
venture, or other form of enterprise.
(2) Facility.--The term ''facility'' means any real
property, including any building, improvement, or appurtenance.
(3) Gross negligence.--The term ''gross negligence'' means
voluntary and conscious conduct by a person with knowledge (at
the time of the conduct) that the conduct is likely to be
harmful to the health or well-being of another person.
(4) Intentional misconduct.--The term ''intentional
misconduct'' means conduct by a person with knowledge (at the
time of the conduct) that the conduct is harmful to the health
or well-being of another person.
(5) Nonprofit organization.--The term ''nonprofit
organization'' means--
(A) any organization described in section 501(c)(3)
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and exempt from
tax under section 501(a) of such Code; or
(B) any not-for-profit organization organized and
conducted for public benefit and operated primarily for
charitable, civic, educational, religious, welfare, or
health purposes.
(6) State.--The term ''State'' means each of the several
States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto
Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, the Northern
Mariana Islands, any other territory or possession of the
United States, or any political subdivision of any such State,
territory, or possession.
(b) Limitation on Liability.--
(1) In general.--Subject to subsection (c), a business
entity shall not be subject to civil liability relating to any
injury or death occurring at a facility of the business entity
in connection with a use of such facility by a nonprofit
organization if--
(A) the use occurs outside of the scope of business
of the business entity;
(B) such injury or death occurs during a period
that such facility is used by the nonprofit
organization; and
(C) the business entity authorized the use of such
facility by the nonprofit organization.
(2) Application.--This subsection shall apply--
(A) with respect to civil liability under Federal
and State law; and
(B) regardless of whether a nonprofit organization
pays for the use of a facility.
(c) Exception for Liability.--Subsection (b) shall not apply to an
injury or death that results from an act or omission of a business
entity that constitutes gross negligence or intentional misconduct,
including any misconduct that--
(1) constitutes a crime of violence (as that term is
defined in section 16 of title 18, United States Code) or act
of international terrorism (as that term is defined in section
2331 of title 18) for which the defendant has been convicted in
any court;
(2) constitutes a hate crime (as that term is used in the
Hate Crime Statistics Act (28 U.S.C. 534 note));
(3) involves a sexual offense, as defined by applicable
State law, for which the defendant has been convicted in any
court; or
(4) involves misconduct for which the defendant has been
found to have violated a Federal or State civil rights law.
(d) Superseding Provision.--
(1) In general.--Subject to paragraph (2) and subsection
(e), this Act preempts the laws of any State to the extent that
such laws are inconsistent with this Act, except that this Act
shall not preempt any State law that provides additional
protection from liability for a business entity for an injury
or death with respect to which conditions under subparagraphs
(A) through (C) of subsection (b)(1) apply.
(2) Limitation.--Nothing in this Act shall be construed to
supersede any Federal or State health or safety law.
(e) Election of State Regarding Nonapplicability.--This Act shall
not apply to any civil action in a State court against a business
entity in which all parties are citizens of the State if such State
enacts a statute--
(1) citing the authority of this subsection;
(2) declaring the election of such State that this Act
shall not apply to such civil action in the State; and
(3) containing no other provision.
Output: Shields a business entity from civil liability relating to any injury or death occurring at a facility of that entity in connection with a use of such facility by a nonprofit organization if: (1) the use occurs outside the scope of business of the business entity; (2) such injury or death occurs during a period that such facility is used by such organization; and (3) the business entity authorized the use of such facility by the organization.
Makes this Act inapplicable to an injury or death that results from an act or omission of a business entity that constitutes gross negligence or intentional misconduct, including misconduct that: (1) constitutes a hate crime or a crime of violence or act of international terrorism for which the defendant has been convicted in any court; or (2) involves a sexual offense for which the defendant has been convicted in any court or misconduct for which the defendant has been found to have violated a Federal or State civil rights law.
Preempts State laws to the extent that such laws are inconsistent with this Act, except State law that provides additional protection from liability. Specifies that this Act shall not be construed to supersede any Federal or State health or safety law.
Makes this Act inapplicable to any civil action in a State court against a business entity in which all parties are citizens of the State if such State, citing this Act's authority and containing no other provision, enacts a statute declaring the State's election that this Act shall not apply to such action in the State.
This Bill focuses on shielding business entities from civil liability relating to an injury or death depending on the conditions of injury, hence the generated summary is correct.

New input case for you: SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ''Prevention and Deterrence of Crimes
Against Children Act of 2005''.

SEC. 2. ASSURED PUNISHMENT FOR VIOLENT CRIMES AGAINST CHILDREN.

(a) Special Sentencing Rule.--Subsection (d) of section 3559 of
title 18, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:
''(d) Mandatory Minimum Terms of Imprisonment for Violent Crimes
Against Children.--A person who is convicted of a Federal crime of
violence against the person of an individual who has not attained the
age of 18 years shall, unless a greater mandatory minimum sentence of
imprisonment is otherwise provided by law and regardless of any maximum
term of imprisonment otherwise provided for the offense--
''(1) if the crime of violence results in the death of a
person who has not attained the age of 18 years, be sentenced
to death or life in prison;
''(2) if the crime of violence is a kidnapping, sexual
assault, or maiming, or results in serious bodily injury (as
defined in section 1365) be imprisoned for life or any term of
years not less than 30;
''(3) if the crime of violence results in bodily injury (as
defined in section 1365), be imprisoned for life or for any
term of years not less than 20;
''(4) if a dangerous weapon was used during and in relation
to the crime of violence, be imprisoned for life or for any
term of years not less than 15; and
''(5) in any other case, be imprisoned for life or for any
term of years not less than 10.''.

SEC. 3. ENSURING FAIR AND EXPEDITIOUS FEDERAL COLLATERAL REVIEW OF
CONVICTIONS FOR KILLING A CHILD.

(a) Limits on Cases.--Section 2254 of title 28, United States Code,
is amended by adding at the end the following:
''(j)(1) A court, justice, or judge shall not have jurisdiction to
consider any claim relating to the judgment or sentence in an
application described under paragraph (2), unless the applicant shows
that the claim qualifies for consideration on the grounds described in
subsection (e)(2). Any such application that is presented to a court,
justice, or judge other than a district court shall be transferred to
the appropriate district court for consideration or dismissal in
conformity with this subsection, except that a court of appeals panel
must authorize any second or successive application in conformity with
section 2244 before any consideration by the district court.
''(2) This subsection applies to an application for a writ of
habeas corpus on behalf of a person in custody pursuant to the judgment
of a State court for a crime that involved the killing of a individual
who has not attained the age of 18 years.
''(3) For an application described in paragraph (2), the following
requirements shall apply in the district court:
''(A) Any motion by either party for an evidentiary hearing
shall be filed and served not later than 90 days after the
State files its answer or, if no timely answer is filed, the
date on which such answer is due.
''(B) Any motion for an evidentiary hearing shall be
granted or denied not later than 30 days after the date on
which the party opposing such motion files a pleading in
opposition to such motion or, if no timely pleading in
opposition is filed, the date on which such pleading in
opposition is due.
''(C) Any evidentiary hearing shall be--
''(i) convened not less than 60 days after the
order granting such hearing; and
''(ii) completed not more than 150 days after the
order granting such hearing.
''(D) A district court shall enter a final order, granting
or denying the application for a writ of habeas corpus, not
later than 15 months after the date on which the State files
its answer or, if no timely answer is filed, the date on which
such answer is due, or not later than 60 days after the case is
submitted for decision, whichever is earlier.
''(E) If the district court fails to comply with the
requirements of this paragraph, the State may petition the
court of appeals for a writ of mandamus to enforce the
requirements. The court of appeals shall grant or deny the
petition for a writ of mandamus not later than 30 days after
such petition is filed with the court.
''(4) For an application described in paragraph (2), the following
requirements shall apply in the court of appeals:
''(A) A timely filed notice of appeal from an order issuing
a writ of habeas corpus shall operate as a stay of that order
pending final disposition of the appeal.
''(B) The court of appeals shall decide the appeal from an
order granting or denying a writ of habeas corpus--
''(i) not later than 120 days after the date on
which the brief of the appellee is filed or, if no
timely brief is filed, the date on which such brief is
due; or
''(ii) if a cross-appeal is filed, not later than
120 days after the date on which the appellant files a
brief in response to the issues presented by the cross-
appeal or, if no timely brief is filed, the date on
which such brief is due.
''(C)(i) Following a decision by a panel of the court of
appeals under subparagraph (B), a petition for panel rehearing
is not allowed, but rehearing by the court of appeals en banc
may be requested. The court of appeals shall decide whether to
grant a petition for rehearing en banc not later than 30 days
after the date on which the petition is filed, unless a
response is required, in which case the court shall decide
whether to grant the petition not later than 30 days after the
date on which the response is filed or, if no timely response
is filed, the date on which the response is due.
''(ii) If rehearing en banc is granted, the court of
appeals shall make a final determination of the appeal not
later than 120 days after the date on which the order granting
rehearing en banc is entered.
''(D) If the court of appeals fails to comply with the
requirements of this paragraph, the State may petition the
Supreme Court or a justice thereof for a writ of mandamus to
enforce the requirements.
''(5)(A) The time limitations under paragraphs (3) and (4) shall
apply to an initial application described in paragraph (2), any second
or successive application described in paragraph (2), and any
redetermination of an application described in paragraph (2) or related
appeal following a remand by the court of appeals or the Supreme Court
for further proceedings.
''(B) In proceedings following remand in the district court, time
limits running from the time the State files its answer under paragraph
(3) shall run from the date the remand is ordered if further briefing
is not required in the district court. If there is further briefing
following remand in the district court, such time limits shall run from
the date on which a responsive brief is filed or, if no timely
responsive brief is filed, the date on which such brief is due.
''(C) In proceedings following remand in the court of appeals, the
time limit specified in paragraph (4)(B) shall run from the date the
remand is ordered if further briefing is not required in the court of
appeals. If there is further briefing in the court of appeals, the time
limit specified in paragraph (4)(B) shall run from the date on which a
responsive brief is filed or, if no timely responsive brief is filed,
from the date on which such brief is due.
''(6) The failure of a court to meet or comply with a time
limitation under this subsection shall not be a ground for granting
relief from a judgment of conviction or sentence, nor shall the time
limitations under this subsection be construed to entitle a capital
applicant to a stay of execution, to which the applicant would
otherwise not be entitled, for the purpose of litigating any
application or appeal.''.
(b) Victims' Rights in Habeas Cases.--Section 3771(b) of title 18,
United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:
''The rights established for crime victims by this section shall also
be extended in a Federal habeas corpus proceeding arising out of a
State conviction to victims of the State offense at issue.''
(c) Application to Pending Cases.--
(1) In general.--The amendment made by this section apply
to cases pending on the date of the enactment of this Act as
well as to cases commenced on and after that date.
(2) Special rule for time limits.--In a case pending on the
date of the enactment of this Act, if the amendment made by
subsection (a) provides that a time limit runs from an event or
time that has occurred before that date, the time limit shall
instead run from that date.
Output:
Prevention and Deterrence of Crimes Against Children Act of 2005 - Rewrites provisions of the federal criminal code regarding penalties for crimes against children to require a person convicted of a federal crime of violence against an individual under age 18 to be sentenced to: (1) death or life imprisonment if the crime results in the death of a person under age 18; (2) life or at least 30 years imprisonment if the crime is a kidnaping, sexual assault, or maiming, or results in serious bodily injury; (3) life or at least 20 years imprisonment if the crime results in bodily injury; (4) life or at least 15 years imprisonment if a dangerous weapon was used during and in relation to the crime; and (5) life or at least ten years imprisonment in any other case.

Denies a court, justice, or judge jurisdiction to consider claims relating to the judgment or sentence in an application for writ of habeas corpus on behalf of a person in custody pursuant to the judgment of a State court for a crime that involved the killing of a person under age 18. Sets timetables for proceedings. Extends certain rights associated with habeas corpus proceedings to victims of the State offense at issue. Makes this Act applicable to pending cases.