TASK DEFINITION: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.
PROBLEM: Comment: Oh, "BIGOTRY!"
Homosexual acts are sinful, and, according to Sacred Scripture, one of the four sins "crying to heaven for vengeance." A gay marriage is (un)naturally going to involve said acts. Are you capable of comprehending this? The baker doesn't want to participate in a wedding that promotes this sin. Now, a bigot is "a person who is obstinately or intolerantly devoted to his or her own opinions and prejudices; [you certainly fit that description to a tee] especially :one who regards or treats the members of a group (such as a racial or ethnic group) with hatred and intolerance."
The question boils down to obstinacy and intolerance. Well, when bases his opinion or belief of something as crystal clear as"homosexual behavior is sinful", is it obstinacy or principled dissent? And why do you think we should be tolerant of sin? That certainly isn't Christ-like, being as that Christ admonished everyone to "sin no more." You are the obstinate bigot here, clearly.

SOLUTION: Identity-attack

PROBLEM: Comment: It's too bad the majority of Alaskans are Idiots.

SOLUTION: Identity-attack

PROBLEM: Comment: Mr. Kelly is not a baseball guy, more of a gadfly, who flits around from topic to topic, looking for ways to poke holes, deflate balloons, and generally make a pest of himself. He uses a sorta urbane borderline-witty writing style to ride shotgun and provide cover for his deficiencies in diamond sense.

If he wants to start a kinda range war, and the consensus here is that he does, maybe, then forget Your Js, go after certain personalities who continue to defend this team despite all appearances to the contrary that the jelly is not of the variety royal.

There are plenty of them, Richard Griffin over @ the Star, and all of the talking heads, with maybe an exception here or there @ Rogers who troll with the best of them.

The utterly stupid signing of Russell Martin, backloading the contract so that this over-the-hill catcher is set to make $20 per for the next 3 seasons, at a time when his skills are obviously in decline, headed towards washed up, that needs a mention.

SOLUTION:
Non-identity-attack