IN: This is an email
Mike & Scott, Sally asked me to forward this to you & wanted to know if there was any way possible you could attend. I apologize for the short notice, but with Sally going out of the country, things have been really hectic. Sheila Glover will also be attending. Please let me know as soon as possible & I will let Paige know. Thanks,

What is the subject?

OUT: FAS 133 Offsite
QUESTION: CES has a synthetic storage deal with Equitable Gas Company on Texas Eastern. CES gave Equitable 100,000 dth in April 1999 and Equitable is giving CES the gas back in January 2000 in Tetco M2. According to my new best buddy Fred at Equitable, CES will pay Equitable $.65 /dth after the January transaction is complete. Here are my questions/comments; 1. David - please look at the new deal I created for this exchange (deal 146788). The existing deal (deal 138741) is set up as a pipeline exchange. I believe the counterparty should be Equitable Gas Company which is the LDC. If it looks OK to you, I will kill the old deal and add the volumes to the new deal. Please let me know ASAP. 2. Linda/David - do we have CES's contract with Equitable? I would like to see a) what CES was paying Equitable for this deal and b) when the payment was due. 3. David/Stephanie - if the deal is structured the way Fred described it above, where do we put the $.65 fee at? 4. Linda - Fred has not received any assignment notices regarding CES deals. He doesn't know if he should bill CES or Enron North America. Who should he talk to about that?? Please forward this email to others that may need to see it. Thanks
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: Equitabel Gas Company Exchange on Tetco
Dear Jason Wolfe, The electronic funds transfer from your bank account to your PayPal account for the amount of $44.00 has been completed. The funds are now reflected in your PayPal account balance. Thank you for using PayPal,
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: Bank Account Transfer Complete
Dear Michelle: I just finished my conference call with Liz Miller (counsel for Calpine), Christina Solomon, and Steve Schuler (Steve is co-counsel for Miller with Christina). Christina had passed along to Liz the various points I made at the meeting last week, so Liz was prepared to address our primary concerns. She made the following points: (1) She has talked with several different people at various levels of authority in Calpine's trading area, and insists that Calpine treats the power grids as "completely different" regions, strategies for which are not shared internally among those regions. (2) She asserts that "how we do it at Calpine is totally different from Enron," since Calpine is "trading around a portfolio of assets that we own." She asserted that Enron, not owning power generation assets, trades differently. When I replied that Enron does have power generation assets, she acknowledged the fact but insisted that Enron's trading style is vastly different due to the difference in emphasis vis a vis the power generation assets. (3) Liz claims that Miller works almost exclusively in "Urcot" (sp??) in Texas, with some participation in Entergy in Louisiana. According to Liz, Calpine's strategies concerning these specific regions is divorced from and not related in any way with any trading Calpine does in the East or West. (4) Liz is of the opinion that Miller "is not senior enough that we would be looking for what he knows." He has no role whatsoever in discussing or formulating strategy for trading. Miller, she insists, is on the receiving end only. He takes orders, dispatching and scheduling solely in response to orders he receives from others. (5) Liz acknowledges that, were Miller in a more senior, responsible position, she would have the same concerns we are expressing were the tables turned. Miller is "so slotted," however, that she believes that he is not in a position to use any Enron trade secret that he might possess (though she and Miller's attorneys expressed doubt that he could retain any critical information, that the most critical information changes on a day-to-day basis). We ended the conversation with the following understandings: (1) Liz will explore whether Calpine could put Miller in a non-trading function for a period of two months or so.
Answer: ENA v. Miller
Here is an email: there is a book request form in Netco\controls\Book request form.xls. I put in the west desk books already. Susan is checking to see if we can use those portfolio and book codes, if not we'll change them. KK
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: book request
QUESTION: Dear Phil Your online pledge has been made to United Way. If the following pledge information is correct, please take no action on this email. If this information is incorrect, please contact Dorothy Bodino (212-251-2443), immediately.
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS:
United Way Electronic Pledge Confirmation