Given a paragraph, generate a claim that is supported by the given paragraph. 1) The claim must contain information from within the paragraph. 2) A sentence within the paragraph can be used as a claim. 3) The claim should not have contradictions within the paragraph. 4) The claim should be at most one sentence long.

[EX Q]: The study evaluated the combined effect of six lifestyle habits on prostate cancer mortality. Those six factors were, as described in the journal article: "not currently smoking or quit 10 or more years ago, body mass index under 30 kg/m2, high vigorous physical activity, high intake of tomatoes and fatty fish, and low intake of processed meat." It's tough to put a price tag on those lifestyle choices. How much does "high vigorous physical activity" cost? How much does it cost to avoid eating processed meat? It would be easy to say this category doesn't apply. But the release does address the issue, saying the study findings underscore "the ongoing need for more effective prevention measures and policies to increase exercise, improve diet quality and reduce tobacco use in our population.It takes co-operation and effort from multiple areas, like insurance companies, employers, policy makers and city planners, to figure out how to creatively support and encourage more exercise into most busy adults' working day." Recognizing the need for policies that support these lifestyle changes is important and addresses the cost issue in a meaningful way. This is where things get a little tricky. The research described in this journal article looked at data from two different studies: the Health Professionals Follow-Up Study (HPFS) and the Physicians' Health Study (PHS). The HPFS tracked 42,701 men from 1986-2010. The PHS tracked 20,324 men from 1982-2010. The release (and journal article) explain that the researchers used the HPFS data to develop a "healthy lifestyle score," and then applied that score to the men in the PHS to see if it predicted whether someone would contract a lethal form of prostate cancer. The researchers identified the number of lethal cases of prostate cancer in each group to calculate benefits. The release states: "Participants with 5 to 6 points [the highest scores] in the HPFS had a 68 percent decreased risk of lethal prostate cancer[,] and a 38 percent decreased risk was observed in the [PHS] for the same comparison." Several points to make here. First, the 'healthy' group appeared to have been compared to the 'least healthy' group (score 0-1) and not all the other groups combined. This was noted in the published results but not mentioned in the release. That's important. Second, the release does not note (but the journal article does) that the 38 percent decreased risk seen in the PHS was not found to be statistically significant. That's also an important distinction. Third, this is the relative reduced risk, and doesn't tell readers what the actual, absolute reduction of risk is. The release doesn't address harms. But the lifestyle choices at issue here are (for the most part) so broadly defined that it would be difficult to say what the harms would be. What harms are associated with eating tomatoes, avoiding processed meats, or not smoking? We'll rate this one not applicable. The release does a good job of explaining what is a somewhat complicated study design. The study is basically an analysis of data drawn from two large, previous studies and the release describes the overall sample size, age range, and length of those two studies. But the language used to describe the results is inappropriate. Since this was an analysis of observational study data that's unable to prove cause and effect, it's misleading to use active verbs to describe the results. The release does this in several places: It's more appropriate to state that these habits were "associated with" reduced risk not that the habits "save lives" or "cut" risk. Another thing that's not clearly explained to readers (as noted above) is what it means to develop a lifestyle scoring system based on one study's data set, and then apply that scoring system to a second data set, when the results section is provided for both data sets. It's confusing. We'd encourage public affairs specialists preparing news releases and reporters using them as their initial sources to focus more on the limitations of this type of research. Sometimes referred to as "data dredging," it's basically finding statistically significant results only by chance. In this case it's a statistic of a statistic (up to 47% of cancer cases could be prevented with these lifestyle interventions). No disease mongering here. Funding sources were clearly identified, and there are no clear conflicts of interest. Things get tricky again here. As the release notes, most prostate cancers don't metastasize and aren't life threatening. But some do metastasize and can be fatal. Are there different types of prostate cancer, just like there are different types of flu? Are there genetic factors that affect risk? Readers would have benefited from that information. And we suppose that the release could have also mentioned other dietary or lifestyle factors that might help reduce risk that were not considered in the paper. However, the range of healthy behaviors discussed here is pretty broad, and it seems excessive to expect the release to address an entire laundry list of possibilities. We'll give this a Satisfactory rating. The study was limited to a relatively high level income group and the interventions may not be attainable for all men, in all socioeconomic groups. Does partaking of vigorous physical exercise on a regular basis require access to a gym or just a high degree of motivation? Are tomatoes and fish attainable year round for all socioeconomic groups? The study addresses this to some extent when it says, "It takes co-operation and effort from multiple areas, like insurance companies, employers, policy makers and city planners, to figure out how to creatively support and encourage more exercise into most busy adults' working day." We'll award a Satisfactory here. There are a lot a lot of papers out there on lifestyle choices and prostate cancer. In fact, the opening sentences in the abstract for the journal article says as much, while articulating what sets this research apart: "Several lifestyle factors have been associated with risk of lethal prostate cancer, but little is known about their combined effect. Our objective was to develop and apply a lifestyle score for prevention of lethal prostate cancer." However, the release does not acknowledge all of the existing work on lifestyle and prostate cancer, and therefore fails to highlight how this paper fits into that broad body of work. Apart from the cause-and-effect statements addressed above, there is no unjustifiable language used here.
[EX A]: Working up a sweat may protect men from lethal prostate cancer

[EX Q]: The sprawling Southeast Asian country of more than 260 million people has not recorded any cases though some of its citizens overseas have contracted the virus, including eight crew on the Diamond Princess cruise liner off Japan's Yokohama. Health Minister Terawan Agus Putranto said 134 test samples taken from people suspected of having the coronavirus had turned out negative. "If until this second all came out negative, then it's a blessing from the Almighty," he told reporters. Putranto said tests on two patients who died this week after suffering symptoms associated with contracting the virus had been negative. On Feb. 23, a Singaporean man died after reportedly suffering fever and shortness of breath in the city of Batam, but the head of the local health agency said this was due to another unspecified disease. The death of a 37-year-old man in Semarang in Central Java who was suffering pneumonia after returning from overseas was not caused by the coronavirus, but by H1N1 flu, he said. Researchers at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, in the United States, said in a study this month that Indonesia should strengthen outbreak surveillance and control - especially as it had direct flights from the central Chinese city of Wuhan, the epicenter of the outbreak. The Harvard team said Indonesia's lack of confirmed cases "may suggest the potential for undetected cases" as air travel may contribute to cases being exported from China. Indonesia has barred entry to visitors who have been in China for 14 days and stopped all flights to and from there. Indonesia has tested relatively few people in comparison to some neighbors and its population, but Putranto said tests were conducted when "doctors determine they have symptoms that point to that direction." "Imagine if everybody who had a cough or flu was checked, then millions would be checked," he said. Navaratnasamy Paranietharan, the World Health Organization's Indonesia representative, has said the WHO was "quite confident that Indonesia is ready to be able to respond to this situation." Separately, Indonesia will send a Garuda Indonesia (GIAA.JK) plane in the next few days to Japan to pick up 68 of its citizens working aboard the coronavirus-affected Diamond Princess, officials said. The crew could be quarantined for up to 28 days on Sebaru island in the Java Sea north off Jakarta, where 188 crew members from another cruise ship are also being held in quarantine. The coronavirus has infected more than 80,000 people globally and killed nearly 2,800, the majority in China.
[EX A]: Indonesia says lack of coronavirus cases a blessing from God.

[EX Q]: A SurfSET Fitness class in New York in an undated photo. REUTERS/SurfSET Fitness/Handout Group fitness gadflies can rejoice. Indoor surfing is a new workout, born of the sea but carving out a place in the center of town. "It's actually harder than surfing," Sarah Ponn, co-founder and fitness director of SurfSET Fitness, said of the class, which claims to squeeze about three hours' worth of surfing-based movement into the 45-minute indoor workout. "Our primary goal is fitness," she said. "We burn a lot of calories. There's a lot of paddling, a lot of standing on an unstable board. It's very athletic." The class revolves around a piece of equipment called the RipSurfer X, which was developed by SurfSET's CEO Mike Hartwick, as a way to stay fit after he retired from professional hockey in 2010. "A surfboard, a real one, is mounted on an unstable surface of inflatable bladders. It moves based on where you place your weight," Ponn explained. "It's like being on water. (In surfing) if you step down with your right foot it will displace the water. Here it's not water, it's air." The class is sequenced like a surfing session on the sea, even as it draws from many disciplines, from interval training to resistance training to Pilates. "We do what you would do during a surf session," Ponn said. The warm up is an intense cardio interval that mimics a sea surfer's paddling out to beyond the break. Then the abdominal work kicks in. "We incorporate a lot of core strength training," Ponn said. "Then we move into sprint segment." Woven into the workout are indoor versions of such surf staples as duck dives, pushing under a wave, and pop ups, going from lying to standing on the board in one jump. Ponn said a session can burn up to 1,000 calories. It also cultivates the traditionally long, lean, well-defined surfer-type body. "It's not a body builder mentality," Ponn said. "It's not about bulking up." For months the class has been popping up temporarily in venues around New York City, Los Angeles, Atlantic City, New Jersey and the Hamptons. A flagship studio is set to open in New York in September. Florida-based fitness and wellness expert Shirley Archer thinks SurfSET is particularly suitable for sports enthusiasts, especially surfers, seeking a fun and different total body workout. "It challenges balance, endurance, upper, lower and core body muscles, and co-ordination," said Archer, who is a spokesperson for the American Council on Exercise, after observing a session on the company's website. She cautions that the risk-averse, the beginning exerciser, or the injury-impaired might want to look elsewhere. "The exercises duck dips, deep squats, etc. are fairly challenging and may be too difficult for people who need to move more slowly and with smaller ranges of motion," said Archer, who is impressed by the apparatus and the creativity of the workout. Ponn said the company is developing a class for older people. A home version of the RipSurfer X is also in the works. A SurfSET Fitness class in New York in an undated photo. REUTERS/SurfSET Fitness/Handout "The machine is highly adjustable," she explained. "You can tighten it down so that it barely moves." The only counter-indication she mentioned was pregnancy. "You can't lie on your stomach and paddle when you're pregnant," she said. "It's kind of sad."
[EX A]:
Surf's up in the fitness studio.