Q: If 2) They cannot operate without hard-to-get government licenses., can we say that "They need a government issued license in order to operate."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A: yes

Premise:
"We also chart the critical consensus about books, movies, art, and music in Summary Judgment and spare you from having to watch the Sunday talk shows by offering you the gist in Pundit Central (check in Sunday evening to prepare for Monday sessions at the water cooler)."
Hypothesis: We do nothing for you and offer you no services.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

no

input question: Mailers are now presorting their mail, barcoding their mail, changing flat-size pieces into letter-size pieces, consolidating their mail, and carrying their mail great distances in order to enter it at specific locations. If this premise is true, does that tell us:"Mailers are no presorting their mail but they aren't barcoding their mail."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: no

Question:
Based on the premise "The information required by sections 603(b)(3) and", can we conclude that "Information is required by section 603(b)(3)."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
yes

Question: Sentence A: The room seemed normal enough, in spite of the odd smells.

Sentence B: There was some odd smells in the room that was otherwise normal.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Question: Sentence A: Alcohol and Other Drug Screening of Hospitalized Trauma Patients, Treatment Improvement Protocol (TIP), No.

Sentence B: They wanted them to receive the best treatments possible.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer:
it is not possible to tell