Given a paragraph about movies and a set of conversational questions and answers about the paragraph, say whether the passage contains sufficient information to answer the follow-up question. Say Yes if it is answerable; otherwise, say No. The paragraph has the prefix 'CONTEXT:'. Each conversation question has a prefix 'Q:' followed by the answer prefix 'A:', and the follow-up question has a prefix 'FOLLOWUP_Q:'.
--------
Question: CONTEXT: This irks me too, but I'm certain it's done to convey to the audience that the character is actually drinking. It's one of those tropes that people have become accustomed to, even though it isn't realistic. It's similar to the trope of "every time you turn on a microphone, it whines with feedback for a second, then settles down." Not realistic, but it clearly shows the audience what's going on. <sep> Q: Why does TV shows always make a full drink sound like an almost empty one?

Answer: Yes

Question: CONTEXT: The short answer, which is probably the best answer, is that he was an experienced hunter and wanted to hunt "the most dangerous game"; a combat soldier. You'll note that he never kills unarmed humans (which is why Anna got sent to the chopper unarmed), and at the conclusion he decided to engage in hand-to-hand combat against Dutch, whom he deemed to be a worthy opponent. <sep> Q: Why did the first Predator come to Earth? A: The short answer, which is probably the best answer, is that he was an experienced hunter and wanted to hunt "the most dangerous game"; a combat soldier Q: Was he already an established hunter? A: he was an experienced hunter Q: Was he just hunting for more trophies? A: wanted to hunt "the most dangerous game"; a combat soldier. You'll note that he never kills unarmed humans <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: I see. So he would only attack armed humans. Got it

Answer: Yes

Question: CONTEXT: Because we don't shoot people for kicking chairs! The SOE official has the gun to defend himself if attacked. Vatan isn't attacking the official (or the Army officer) he's just kicking the chair in frustration and outrage....and that's not something to be shot for! Equally, the SOE need Vatan to keep Marianne in place while they identify her handler...another reason not to shoot him. <sep> Q: Why S.O.E official didn't shoot Max Vatan for not allowing him to investigate Marianne? A: Because we don't shoot people for kicking chairs Q: What do they shoot people for? A: The SOE official has the gun to defend himself if attacked <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Is he ever attacked?

Answer:
Yes