TASK DEFINITION: Categorize the comment on the basis of severe toxicity. If the comment is severely toxic output Yes, otherwise output No.
PROBLEM: To paraphrase Douglas Adams: It has been said that Alaskan legislators are not above a little bribery and corruption in the same way that the sea is not above the clouds.

Alaska is not a corporation. It's a government of the people being run by corporations through their representatives, who we vote for; otherwise known as a Kleptocracy.

Alaskans opted for this when we decided we didn't want to pay for our government, and gave that over to the oil industry, ignoring the time-honored maxim, "You get what you pay for." The trouble is, the oil companies don't have the Alaskan Constitution written into their charters and are running the state for their own benefit, not ours.

So now we have a legislature that primarily represents Big Oil and that's exactly how the majority of Alaskan voters want it.

SOLUTION: No

PROBLEM: So, how have wages done during this run up of rental rates?
As for not-being-able-to-afford-to-move: moving to Springfield, where rental rates are far lower, isn't very expensive. Unless one owns a house full of stuff in which case a garage sale would help.
Is it government's job to ensure everyone below absolute middle-class can afford to live in any town? I mean, I'd like to live in Palo Alto, La Jolla, or Mill Valley (most upscale of CA areas)--- should the California legislature pay for it?
If you cannot afford to live somewhere, it's not government's job to help.
If you need health care, basic shelter, or food--- okay, that is a responsibility.

SOLUTION: No

PROBLEM: My mother now 92 was a 1940's RN. Nurses are invaluable. My mother never focused on how much she was paid. It was a different world back then.

SOLUTION:
No