Here is the draft for distribution. In addition to the customer-friendly "looking forward to meeting with our business partners" language I know you'll include, I'd suggest including something like the following: Attached are drafts of the proposed tariff provisions (including the form of Transport Option Amendment) and a filing letter. We are providing these draft documents to you in advance of filing them with FERC as part of a good-faith effort to resolve any remaining issues with our shippers prior to filing. The drafts are for purposes of discussion by workshop attendees only, and we ask that you not distribute them to persons outside your company. Additionally, while we hope that these drafts are close to being in final form, they are of course subject to revision and final management approval prior to filing with the Commission.
Answer: TW Options
Tanya: I left you a voice mail earlier this week on the single outstanding issue: paragraph (B) of our setoff language. This provision allows the nondefaulting party to withhold any payment it might owe to the defaulting party under the master until the nondefaulting party can be certain IN ITS REASONABLE DISCRETION that ANY other payments owed to it (under ANY other agreements between the parties) by the defaulting party have been paid. Cargill does not want to "comingle" its business. Remember, we have already given in on "affiliate setoff". [the lawyer never raised the paragraph (B) issue until this week!] Also, Cargill has requested that we change our Credit Support Amount definition (but I provided them with an explanation) AND Cargill has decided to issue transferable L/C's. Please let me hear from you so that we can finalize. I do not know if this is a deal breaker.
Answer: Cargill, Incorporated
Corinne: I just sent you a fax re: arbitration. I have not heard from your salesperson re: interest schedule for debit rate (Sec. 2) and credit rate (Sec. 6). Thanks.
Answer: futures agreement
Torrey, Rob Benson is currently trading two general power regions (PJM and New York) under one EOL ID. He manages one stack manager of which all deals are mapped to his EPMI-LT-PJM book. He would like to create an additional stack manager so that he can divide the two regions into their own stack and manage them on separate screens. All of the deals would continue to go into the LT-PJM book. Let me know if this would be doable and what I need to do on my side to help out. Thanks!
Answer:
Multiple Stack Manager