Premise:
"For the Alternative Estimate, a cost-of illness value is used in place of willingness-to-pay to reflect uncertainty about the value of reductions in incidences of chronic bronchitis."
Hypothesis: In order to reflect uncertainty about the value of reductions in incidences of chronic bronchitis in the Alternative Estimate the cost-of-illness value is used.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

yes

input question: they just they're not meant to last at all If this premise is true, does that tell us:"Planned obsolescence is why they don't last."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: it is not possible to tell

Question:
Based on the premise "Vrenna, we move, said Jon.", can we conclude that "Jon told Vrenna to stay."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
no

Question: Sentence A: It turns out that Mr. Ed, the talking horse, died of a drug overdose.

Sentence B: Mr. Ed has died of an overdose on drugs.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Question: Its lesbian/bisexual (we're never told which) female subject allows shoes to tap wider contexts of a male protagonist wouldn't have had her access to the history of discrimination in the work place; and an infusion of color ( race) might have narrowed the canvas, making the problem seem less pervasive than it is.
The female subject is in her mid-thirties.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Problem: Here is a premise:
Although Washington remained the center of GAO's activities, the agency's auditors first began doing fieldwork in the mid1930s.

Here is a hypothesis:
GAO's activities focused on Washington.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer:
yes