Attached are the Q&A's published by corporate. These Q&A's are targeted primarily to terminated employees. More Q&A's concerning our current employees are in process and will be distributed as soon as possible. We will try to address your questions at the floor meeting scheduled for 1:00 PM. The call-in number for the meeting is 1-800-820-4690, code: 7012645# Julie Kearney
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: Q&A's
"Kirkpatrick, Joe" <joe.kirkpatrick@nrgenergy.com> writes to the NYISO_TECH_EXCHANGE Discussion List: The results of the recent capacity auctions would seem to highlight that New York and NYC in particular may not be the "tight markets" that require the numerous layers of mitigation presently in place. It is difficult to determine the "spare" capacity in NYC, Long Island or the Rest of State market due the fact that New York unlike other ISOs does not publish what the total capacity supply is for each month or season. The "curtailable load" portion of the equation has had a significant impact on capacity requirements but as yet it is unknown what the total impact is. This new capacity supply is effectively increasing the supply of available capacity. Quoting generation capabilities and load requirements excludes curtailable load and other demand response mechanisms, the exclusion of these factors grossly misrepresents supply conditions. Total capacity and spare capacity after the completion of all the capacity auctions is information essential to the economics for developers who are developing or constructing generation in NYC and other areas in NY. There is only a set amount of capacity required in New York and New York City, adjustments in price do not increase demand as they would in other commodities. Assumptions that supplies are tight and developers can rely on capacity payments to contribute to fixed cost recovery are severely overstated. There is a significant surplus of capacity in NYC alone, at a minimum there is well over 800 MW of spare capacity that we can account for as a result of the recent auctions. How much more capacity is out there? Market participants require this information to assess the economics to develop and build new generation facilities. If capacity payments are being included in project economics then this will have a significant impact on the viability of projects if those capacity payments are not there. This information needs to be published. Joe
Answer: Capacity Totals
Here is an email: Ken I understand a Turkish industrialist named Nuri ?olakoglu has been in contact with you through Bill Miller and possibly Jerry Giest. Colakoglu is an extremely wealthy and well regarded Turkish industrialist who has aggressively expanded into the Turkish energy sector. We have had a number of meetings with Colakoglu over the years and although we appreciate his potential prospects for the future we do not see a win-win opporutnity with his organization at this time. We expect he may try and contact you so wanted to let you know in advnace the background on his proposal. Colakoglu has proposed that, in order to manage our Trakya payment issue, Enron utilize the Arcos turbines to build, on balance sheet, a 1200 MW power plant at the tailgate of his recently completed specualtive LNG regas facility in Turkey. The plant would be part of a comprehensive proposal to the Turkish Ministry of Energy and Natural Resources to reduce the prices at Trakya, in exchange for an agreement by TETTA? (the new Turkish power trading company resulting from the split up of TEA?, the former electricity monopoly) to purchase power from the new facility. All three plants would be fuelled by LNG provided by Enron and tolled through the Colakoglu's regas facility. In essence, Nuri wants us to build a power station as soon as possible to use the capacity at his LNG terminal which is now idle and has the potential to be a white elephant. Our team has explained to Colakoglu that they thought the fact that the proposal relied totally on TETTA? 's credit was fatal, but that they would discuss it with EEL management. Lloyd Wantschek has responded to Colakoglu in the attached letter (we have highlighted the relevant portion for your information).
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: Turkish industrialist Nuri Coalkoglu
Q: You have received this message because someone has attempted to send you an e-mail from outside of Enron with an attachment type that Enron does not allow into our messaging environment. Your e-mail has been quarantined and is being held at the MailSweeper server. Sender: jfields@argentinc.com
Propose a subject line
A: An Inbound Message For You Has Been Quarantined
IN: market_relations@nyiso.com writes to the NYISO_TECH_EXCHANGE Discussion List: Dear Market Participants: On the November 1999 & December 1999 Transmission Customer Monthly Statements many customers have noted under the "Energy Settlement" section for "Forward Energy" a change in MW-Hrs with no associated change in dollar amounts. This is because of a correction in the sign convention for the MW-Hrs related to external generation transactions (transactions from a proxy bus to the NYISO reference bus). For all other types of transactions the NYISO charges customers the appropriate TUC or LBMP based on the MWs that flowed, but for external generation transactions, customers receive payments from the NYISO, and therefore these types of transactions have an opposite sign convention. The dollars associated with the external generation transactions have always had the proper sign convention, but the MW-Hrs have not. On 01/17/2000 this sign convention was corrected for all billing months going forward resulting in the correct MW-Hr values being reported from February 2000 to date. However, November 1999 - January 2000 did not have the proper MW-Hrs reported on the Transmission Customer Monthly Statements. With the latest settlement adjustments posted the MW-Hrs are being corrected with the proper sign convention. Transmission Customers will see similar changes in their forward energy MW-Hrs for January 2000's settlement adjustment.

Generate a subject line.

OUT: November & December 1999 Settlement Adjustments
IN: This is an email
Dear Sports Fan, At Betquick, we allow any sports combination in a parlay. You can mix and match up to 6 different sports teams in a parlay. You can even parlay a Golf match-up with a football team or whatever team you desire. We also offer the following: 1. Post several straight bets with one click of the confirm button. 2. Make an If-Win bet. Example: If my parlay or straight bet wins bet the following... 3. Reverse bets 4. Round Robin or Box And much, much more... If that's not enough, we will add 15% to your deposit to try our fully licensed online sportsbook. This offer is good until September 6, 2001. Sincerely,

What is the subject?

OUT:
Can you bet mixed parlays with your sportsbook?