Given a paragraph about movies and a set of conversational questions and answers about the paragraph, say whether the passage contains sufficient information to answer the follow-up question. Say Yes if it is answerable; otherwise, say No. The paragraph has the prefix 'CONTEXT:'. Each conversation question has a prefix 'Q:' followed by the answer prefix 'A:', and the follow-up question has a prefix 'FOLLOWUP_Q:'.

[Q]: CONTEXT: I accept and agree with the answer that was given on SFF ("Sansa was smart enough to wait for everyone to say aye, so they can't go back on their word"). However in my opinion there could also be the fact that, the north has always had its own sort of "culture" and independence, there is a certain respect between northern houses. So it's easier for the other kingdoms to accept them as independent, since they've always, culturally, been seen as seperate from the other six kingdoms. On top of this, the north is the size of the other six kingdoms combined, so having them ruled independently makes much more sense, than in the other kingdoms cases. <sep> Q: Why didn't the other kingdoms want to be independent?
[A]: Yes

[Q]: CONTEXT: Yes. He's supposed to be the same character. The timeline of the story arc is all over the place now but Spectre could be regarded as a prequel to the series before Daniel Craig. Some say a reboot but apparently its all supposed to be the same story. This falls apart because of Judi Denchs M, Bond's previous encounters with Spectre and Blofeld etc though. <sep> Q: Is Franz Oberhauser related to the original Blofeld? A: He's supposed to be the same character Q: what is the role? is anything curious thing is there? A: The timeline of the story arc is all over the place now but Spectre could be regarded as a prequel to the series before Daniel Craig Q: oh! then what about the main theme of his movie? A: Some say a reboot but apparently its all supposed to be the same story. This falls apart because of Judi Denchs M, Bond's previous encounters with Spectre and Blofeld etc though Q: oh! then what about the end of the story? A: This falls apart because of Judi Denchs M, Bond's previous encounters with Spectre and Blofeld etc though <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: do you personally know about bond?
[A]: No

[Q]: CONTEXT: How Bruce Banner found the Avengers: When Banner was aboard the Hellicarrier, his gamma ray search algorithm had worked out where the Tesseract was (Stark Tower), but before he could tell anyone Loki's machinations kicked in and he turned into the Hulk. After he went back to being Bruce Banner, he just found his way to Stark Tower, where the rest of the Avengers had assembled. How Thor found the Avengers: This one's a bit more problematic. Thor seems to have the ability to track down Loki. Witness how Thor knew Loki was held inside the jet after he was captured by S.H.I.E.L.D.. How he does that isn't known. So I'm assuming that, however he does it, Thor simply tracked down Loki to Stark Tower. <sep> Q: How did Thor and Banner know where to go? A: After he went back to being Bruce Banner, he just found his way to Stark Tower, where the rest of the Avengers had assembled Q: How do Banner and Thor know that they need to go to the tower? A: How he does that isn't known. So I'm assuming that, however he does it, Thor simply tracked down Loki to Stark Tower Q: What happens after they track down Loki? A: Thor seems to have the ability to track down Loki. Witness how Thor knew Loki was held inside the jet after he was captured by S.H.I.E.L.D <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: So are Thor and Loki connected somehow?
[A]:
No