IN: Kevin, I am the executive recruiter you spoke to today about new job opportunities. Thanks very much for your time. As discussed, I've attached my contact information for your records. Please send your resume back to me in Word format and let's make arrangements to discuss your background and interests in new job opportunities. You can find more information about my firm at www.firstcallassociates.com. We are very familiar with the nuances of the energy trading business and have built relationships with many energy companies in North America enabling us to present qualified employees for their consideration. Adrian Clark Director First Call Associates, Inc. 8 Andrew Dr. Canton, CT 06019 (860)693-4122 (860)693-4118 (fax)

Generate a subject line.

OUT: First Call Contact Information
IN: This is an email
Jeff, Al and I would like to thank you for your kind endorsement of Expectations Investing. We look forward to sending you a final copy when it is published in early September. I would love to catch up with you. Please let me know if you're in NY with a few extra moments-alternatively, I'd be pleased to come to Houston. Best regards,

What is the subject?

OUT: Thank you for endorsement
QUESTION: Something like this might be appropriate to send to the larger weekly group...please edit, revise, etc.. The first group of trading contracts will go out to 77 companies for a total of 168 counterparties (most companies have multiple entities). This group obviously does not include everyone, but we have most of our major relationships (and it is the official list that has been submitted to UBS for credit approval.) The general marketing plan is as follows: - Contact all customers this week to tell them about UBS Warburg Energy - Get contract packages in front of First Priority counterparties this week - Arrange meetings or follow-up calls as appropriate - Dave Forster and the ubswenergy.com team will be sending out online PA packages to all parties later this week (so it is important to have contacted all customers) - Once the initial wave of contracts is out and review/negotiations are uderway, we will submit a Second Priority list for credit approval The attached file has all of the First Priority counterparties, along with names for gas, power, online, credit and legal. In addition, we have columns for describing the type of agreement and its status (not pursuing, incomplete, done). Please complete and/or edit the attached and forward to either Debra Bailey or Lloyd Will. If you think you should take the lead on a particular counterparty, call up the other marketer and work it out! Progress on this effort will be reviewed during our twice-weekly calls.
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: UBS Warburg Energy - First Priority Trading Agreements
Hi Lynn, I worked through lunch Friday so that I could leave at 4 sorry I missed you. Attached will be the insert for the Nutcraker Invitation. Shelley would like for me to get these out ASAP so I just wanted to get your approval on the insert. Are there any changes you would like for me to make?? Because of paper format you will need to scroll down. Also will Sheila, Shelley and yourself be taking their own vehicle or would you like for me to rent a van big enough for everyone to be in one group?? Thanks,
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: Nutcraker Invitation
=20 =09 Utilities Biweekly Report =09 A news service for energy professionals =09 October 17, 2001 =09 To Remove, Substitute or Add an email address to our list, please send bri= ef message to msid@ieee.org=20 =20 =20 FERC Rejects Reasons for Suppliers Higher Prices In an order issued on October 5, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission = (FERC) rejected the cost justifications of several power suppliers that so= ld wholesale electricity above the proxy market-clearing price during July= 2001. The electricity had been sold into the California Independent Syste= m Operator (CA-ISO) and Western Systems Coordinating Council (WSCC). FERC = said that the justifications from Dynegy, Reliant Energy, Mirant, and Willi= ams Energy were "either untimely filed and/or unsupported" and has ordered= refunds on those transactions. The four suppliers submitted their cost ju= stifications in compliance with FERC's April 26 order that established pri= ce mitigation for sales into the CA-ISO's spot markets starting in late Ma= y. That order required power suppliers and generators who submitted bids a= bove the market-clearing price to file a justification for the higher pric= es within seven days of the end of the month in which the sale occurred. F= ERC did not disclose how much money would be refunded since the four compa= nies requested that the matter be treated confidentially. In a separate ca= se, FERC Administrative Law Judge Bruce Birchman has until March 8 to issu= e a report on whether California is entitled to refunds of nearly $9 billi= on for wholesale power purchases when prices skyrocketed in the past year.= The report's recommendations will be considered by FERC commissioners for= further action. =20 Nuclear plant had long list of failings Inexperience, sloppy work habits and poor maintenance increased the chance= s of dangerous accidents at the Bruce nuclear power station in Ontario, th= e world's largest atomic facility, says a secret report obtained by The Gl= obe and Mail. The report was compiled in 1998 by a group of highly trained= , independent nuclear experts from the World Association of Nuclear Operat= ors (WANO), an industry advisory group based in Atlanta. It was given to O= ntario Power Generation, the provincially owned utility, the following year= . Among its findings: Some operators were unaware of such important topics= as the time it would take for water in reactors to begin boiling away if = flows of cooling water were blocked. Nuclear-plant operators disconnected = warning alarms they found too noisy. Operators sometimes did not watch ins= trument control panels, but had their backs turned to them, which could sl= ow any response to a problem. "Should an inadvertent loss of primary heat = transport coolant occur, operator response could be delayed, resulting in = a loss of core cooling." More than 2,500 nuclear-plant modifications were = not incorporated into design manuals, leading to confusion about how the p= lant actually runs. There was a backlog in preventive and corrective maint= enance and some maintenance work was poorly done. WANO tried to block The = Globe's access to the report, which listed dozens of other sloppy practice= s at the Bruce facility, and a second related report that found troubling = safety lapses at the Pickering nuclear station. But the organization recen= tly abandoned a court challenge seeking to have the documents remain confi= dential. It is the first time WANO reports assessing the performance of nu= clear plants have been publicly released anywhere in the world. A Bruce st= ation official said its performance has improved dramatically since the cr= itical report was written. WANO now considers Bruce "one of the fastest im= proving nuclear plants in North America," said Duncan Hawthorne, chief exe= cutive officer at the site. One nuclear energy critic said concerns raised = in the report about possible loss of cooling -- an interruption in the flo=
Answer: Utilities Biweekly Report
Q: It looks like we need to be consistent in booking the GD spread deals. Take a look at the example and please remember to book all future deals in a similar manner. If you have any questions, please let me know. Thanks. DG
Propose a subject line
A:
Gas Daily "four leg" Booking