instruction:
Given the Question and Answer pair, detect whether the answer is acceptable or not. Denote acceptable answer as "yes", otherwise denote as "no". An acceptable answer is consistent with the context in question, detailed, long, and uses general knowledge of English. Answers that are not definite and suggest a variety of options are not acceptable answers.
question:
Question: Does "egoistic" and "egotistic" mean the same thing?
Answer: An "egotist" thinks that the world revolves around him/her. An "egoist" is a petty soul, disregarding of the rights and needs of others. It is synonymous with "selfish person".
answer:
no

question:
Question: This year there were: many more people much more people Alternatively: many fewer people much fewer people Which is considered better English?
Answer: Both much and many can be used, but which is appropriate depends on whether the noun they're referring to is countable or not. With countable nouns, use many more or many fewer: I had many more bananas than Tom. I had many fewer nickels than Alice. With uncountable nouns, use much more or much less How much more fiber does a banana have than an apple? How much less water does this process use?.
answer:
yes

question:
Question: English isn't my mother tongue, and when we recently talked to a native speaker (during some company audit), he pointed out that the plural word "trainings" is actually wrong (he pointed that it is a very common mistake and was almost amused by it). I couldn't understand why and wondered what the correct plural of "training" would be. Online Dictionaries/Thesaurus don't answer it, so it's probably another opinion-based statement. I haven't found a source to back it up, though.
Answer: Training is both countable and uncountable. Usually, referring to a process, it is uncountable and has no plural. It is sometimes used to mean "a specific training event", and is then countable, and has the plural "trainings". The OED has examples of this use going back to 1578, with the plural recorded from 1598.
answer:
yes