Jesus, Friday, April 28, works for me. I am free between 8:00 - 10:30 to meet with Aram. Would you like to meet him for lunch or dinner? Vince
Answer: Aram's visit
Here is an email: I liked the new signs for the new hire network this morning, as opposed to the signs for new hire orientation. Just wanted to let you know that I noticed the difference! I will be curious to hear about changes to the content as well. Hope your are doing well. We will have to have lunch after you get through January! --Sally
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: New Hire Network
Q: Please read the attached. This is one of my friends from the "B" group. She is a free-lance writer for several magazines. Do you know of anyone she could interview? What not you?
Propose a subject line
A: Help!
IN: This deal discrepancy seems to have a few of us stumped - so I'm referring it to all of you in hopes that we can solve this today. Following are the terms of the deal: Short Term California buys Enron Energy Services Hours: HE 6-9 Delivery Point: SP-15 Term: 3/29/01 Price: $110 The deal was entered by Bert Meyers, a Real Time trader, on behalf of STCA. It was extended for HE 9 through 22 at a price of $160. In the spreadsheet Real Time sends to EES each day, it shows the deal as a sale at a price of $130, not a buy at a price of $160. My first instinct was to simply modify the spreadsheet to match the deal in Enpower, but EES claims they see the price coming across as $130. I'm reluctant to send any more incorrect information to EES, as we've already dealt with enough confusion over this matter. Please take a look at the deal and its corresponding documents, and let me know which is the correct price. Thanks for your help,

Generate a subject line.

OUT: EPMI/EES Discrepancies - Deal 564094
IN: This is an email
Attached is a revised petition which includes the section of ECS' discussions with WFEC. Please review. I sending out this draft for the sake of saving time without review by my clients and am asking them to review as well. I assume the next step is for Jeff to revise the conclusion with the bullets points and circulate a final draft for everyone's review. Let me know if this is not the case. Thanks for your help.

What is the subject?

OUT: Revised Petition
Maria Pavlou has graciously agreed to give the TW Commercial Group a brief review of the Global Settlement on Thursday, November 1 from 10 - 11:30 am in 49C2. Please mark your calendars if you are interested in attending. Lorraine
Answer:
TW Global Settlement