In this task, you're given reviews from Amazon's food products and a summary of that review. Your task is to classify whether the given summary matches the original review. Generate "True" if the given review and its summary match, otherwise generate "False".

Input: Consider Input: Reviews: The back of the case is nice, slicker than I thought which is fine, still comfortable, but the overall materials (rubber/plastic casing) is pretty flimsy. Though the most important feature, the lip for the glass screen, is just too short by a mm or 2. So, if you use a glass screen protector, like zagg, when putting phone face down, you will be sitting on the glass, not on the case's lip. Also, I dont believe that if this phone was dropped that it would actually do much for protection. I was under the impression this would be a bit more rigid, like incipio or incase. Full edge shock protection is quite a stretch.
Summary: They look ok but cheap and they already lost the ...

Output: False

Input: Consider Input: Reviews: I purchased this particular handheld model to replace an older one purchased about a year and a half ago. Both my wife and I felt extremely optimistic given the high reviews. However, we are now promptly returning it and will buy from a different brand. First, the crevice tool was never included in the box. If the vacuum actually worked as described, this would not have been a huge issue. As you can probably already infer, the vacuum's functionality (in addition to the missing part) WAS a disappointment. After using it twice (both times fully charged), we realized that our old, much cheaper handheld still worked better. With the brush or extension tube attachment connected, it seemed essentially worthless with regard to suction. Further, even without an attachment, the vacuum literally had no true suction power. It struggled to pick up even the smallest and lightest weight particles on the floor, stairs, counter, etc. Again, given the positive reviews, we were very hopeful that it would be a great replacement. Unfortunately, it's boxed up and will be dropped off at UPS tomorrow.
Summary: the vacuum's functionality (in addition to the missing part) WAS a disappointment. After using it twice (both times fully charge

Output: True

Input: Consider Input: Reviews: This was a complete waste of money. I spent $50 on two of them. Unfortunately my return window has ended, or I would be sending these back. They completely blow out within a month of use. These were delivered a month and a day ago. Worthless. You're better off attaching an old sock to the end of your garden hose. It will probably hold water better.
Summary: Very hard and uncomfortable, doesn't work properly!
Output: False