Given the task definition, example input & output, solve the new input case.
In this task, you must classify if a given review is positive/negative, indicating your answer as P or N.
Example: plot : two teen couples go to a church party , drink and then drive .
they get into an accident .
one of the guys dies , but his girlfriend continues to see him in her life , and has nightmares .
what 's the deal ?
watch the movie and " sorta " find out . . .
critique : a mind - fuck movie for the teen generation that touches on a very cool idea , but presents it in a very bad package .
which is what makes this review an even harder one to write , since i generally applaud films which attempt to break the mold , mess with your head and such ( lost highway & memento ) , but there are good and bad ways of making all types of films , and these folks just did n't snag this one correctly
.
they seem to have taken this pretty neat concept , but executed it terribly .
so what are the problems with the movie ?
well , its main problem is that it 's simply too jumbled
.
it starts off " normal " but then downshifts into this " fantasy " world in which you , as an audience member ,
have no idea what 's going on
.
there are dreams , there are characters coming back from the dead , there are others who look like the dead , there are strange apparitions , there are disappearances , there are a looooot of chase scenes , there are tons of weird things that happen , and most of it is simply not explained .
now i personally do n't mind trying to unravel a film every now and then , but when all it does is give me the same clue over and over again , i get kind of fed up after a while , which is this film 's biggest problem .
it 's obviously got this big secret to hide , but it seems to want to hide it completely until its final five minutes .
and do they make things entertaining , thrilling or even engaging , in the meantime ?
not really .
the sad part is that the arrow and i both dig on flicks like this , so we actually figured most of it out by the half - way point , so all of the strangeness after that did start to make a little bit of sense , but it still did n't the make the film all that more entertaining .
i guess the bottom line with movies like this is that you should always make sure that the audience is " into it " even before they are given the secret password to enter your world of understanding .
i mean , showing melissa sagemiller running away from visions for about 20 minutes throughout the movie is just plain lazy ! !
okay , we get it .
. .
there are people chasing her and we do n't know who they are .
do we really need to see it over and over again ?
how about giving us different scenes offering further insight into all of the strangeness going down in the movie ?
apparently , the studio took this film away from its director and chopped it up themselves , and it shows .
there might 've been a pretty decent teen mind - fuck movie in here somewhere , but i guess " the suits " decided that turning it into a music video with little edge , would make more sense .
the actors are pretty good for the most part , although wes bentley just seemed to be playing the exact same character that he did in american beauty , only in a new neighborhood .
but my biggest kudos go out to sagemiller , who holds her own throughout the entire film , and actually has you feeling her character 's unraveling .
overall , the film does n't stick
because it does n't entertain , it 's confusing , it rarely excites and
it feels pretty redundant for most of its runtime , despite a pretty cool ending and explanation to all of the craziness that came before it .
oh ,
and by the way , this is not a horror or teen slasher flick . . .
it 's just packaged to look that way because someone is apparently assuming that the genre is still hot with the kids .
it also wrapped production two years ago and has been sitting on the shelves ever since .
whatever . .
. skip it !
where 's joblo coming from ?
a nightmare of elm street 3 ( 7/10 ) - blair witch 2 ( 7/10 ) - the crow ( 9/10 ) - the crow : salvation ( 4/10 )
- lost highway ( 10/10 ) - memento ( 10/10 ) - the others ( 9/10 ) - stir of echoes ( 8/10 )
Output: N
The phrases used in the review convey a negative sentiment (e.g. "presents it in a very bad package").

New input case for you: i can see a decent sports movie struggling to break free of oliver stone 's ' any given sunday ' .
it 's an entertaining movie that offers both insight and excitement into the rock - em , sock - em profession of pro football .
unfortunately , the director seems to have only one priority on his mind : sprucing up the film with an assortment of fancy camera maneuvers .
in altering each frame with quick - flash photography and dizzying , in - your - face editing , stone appears to have completely ignored the matter of plausible character development and football politics .
we see glimpses of greatness , but ' any given sunday ' has its agenda all tangled in technical gobbledy - gook .
it grows tiresome and monotonous
.
yes , stone has pulled a brian depalma .
matters of importance are pushed aside right from the get - go .
tony d'amato ( al pacino ) , coach of the struggling miami sharks , finds his team stuck in a losing rut .
aging quarterback cap rooney ( dennis quaid ) appears to be losing his touch , and d'amato ca n't seem to ignite any passion in his squad .
when cap is injured on the field , and after a patch of unlikely events occur , third - string qb willie beaman ( jamie foxx ) is brought into the game .
once in the huddle ( and this becomes an in - game ritual ) , beaman horks all over the field .
nerves , you see .
eventually though , the ancy youngster wins the game for his teammates , sparking his rise to fame in the football world - the endorsements , the music videos , etc .
- and stone straps us in for the jolting ride of behind - the - scenes stress and fury that the business is apparently like .
and i believe it .
there is some intriguing insight posed , but in the big scheme of things , stone fumbles the ball .
the problem with the director 's visual approach is this : he uses extravagant editing devices when a more conventional approach would have been appropriate .
football is an exciting game to watch , but stone seems to think dizzying the audience with an assault on the senses will only add to the adrenaline rush .
i guess he is mistaken .
' any given sunday ' is a visual kaleidoscope that leaves the audience in a frustrated stupor more frequently than it excites them .
many football fans ( including one i attended with ) are liable to be disappointed with the ' ultra - stylish ' way stone has decided to present the game .
in return , a three - star film becomes unfortunately degraded
due to the director 's tampering .
in welcome scenes when the visual pummeling comes to a break , this actually shows decent character development and interaction .
for instance , heated returns between d'amato and feisty young owner christina pagniacci ( cameron diaz ) are enjoyable to watch .
there is also a solid performance from jamie foxx , who experiments with great success in his first trek into dramatic territory .
the stellar supporting cast includes matthew modine , aaron eckhart , lauren holly , ann - margret and charlton heston ( in an extraordinarily brief appearance ) .
unfortunately , too many big names are wasted - a typical demise for a film with such a large and experienced cast .
pacino makes some interesting progress with his character .
you begin to identify with coach d'amato and the morals he is striving for . . . .
but i often felt he was just another play thing stone could weave in and out of his editing dynamics .
' any given sunday ' is a watchable but disappointing sports film in which plot and characters take a back seat to excessive filmmaking technique .
and a very distant back seat , at that .
Output:
N