Categorize the comment on the basis of severe toxicity. If the comment is severely toxic output Yes, otherwise output No.

Example Input: I guess you think if I give a friend a ride and he gives me money for my time and gas, it should be regulated...for 'safety', 'the children', and all the other scare tactics we're accustomed to.
Better get with technology...it's breaking all the paradigms of the past...
Example Output: No

Example Input: This is what small government looks like. To be clear, a lot of other Valley neighborhoods are used as drunken playgrounds for idiots. It's really just about attracting and pandering to discourteous people, people who litter and race their ATVs and dirt bikes on residential roads.

Reminds me of the sleazy Anchorageites who successfully lobbied the Assembly to let them throw their drunken parties and take over a small residential lake every weekend, making the actual residents miserable. Those Anchorageites were insufferably self righteous about their entitlement to trash a Valley neighborhood on the weekends with their equally sleazy friends.

The Assembly took the side of the weekenders over the actual residents.

Yahoo MatSu, right?
Example Output: Yes

Example Input: Nope, society can keep kicking them down, pushing them back into drug or alcohol use and continue to suffer because if not. Or, society can help these people up, create new useful people in society and not have the costs associated with that addiction. You're right David, society has a choice.
Example Output:
No