Given the task definition, example input & output, solve the new input case.
In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.
Example: Comment: President lied under oath about consensual sex...
Not the same thing as rape.
Output: Sexual-explicit
This comment explicitly mentions "consensual sex" and "rape", and thus is sexual-explicit.

New input case for you: Comment: You completely missed the point of nigel's argument. His co-worker had no insurance, and basically paid next to nothing for childbirth because he COULDN'T afford the regular cost out of pocket. That is how other people were screwed, because that cost was passed on to the rest of us.

Seems to me that, if you want total freedom, and want people to have the freedom to not have to have insurance, then you need to decide whether or not someone should still get treated for an injury if they 1) chose to not buy insurance, and 2) can't afford the treatment.

Nigel's question wasn't whether or not someone should be able to pay out of pocket if they can afford it.....it was addressing whether or not someone that chose to not have insurance, and can't afford the treatment, should still be treated.

I'm curious to see if you will ever actually have an answer, or just another dodge.
Output:
Non-sexual-explicit