Q: If By seeking to prohibit the analysis of certain legal issues and to truncate presentation to the courts, the enactment under review prohibits speech and expression upon which courts must depend for the proper exercise of the judicial power., can we say that "The enactment in question encourages speech."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A: no

Premise:
"In 1807 the Treaty was put in jeopardy and the troops returned, re?ain?ng until 1814."
Hypothesis: The treaty was in jeopardy.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

yes

input question: An economic analysis of a policy compares the world with the policy (the policy scenario) to the world absent the policy (the reference case or baseline scenario). If this premise is true, does that tell us:"A policy is analysed on an economic basis by comparing the world with and without the policy."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: yes

Question:
Based on the premise " "We have discussed your reward, and you shall indeed have it," Sather Karf went on.", can we conclude that "The reward was tremendous. "? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
it is not possible to tell

Question: Sentence A: After the American Revolution came the French Revolution and a new world order.

Sentence B: A new world order was created after the French Revolution.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Question: Sentence A: Today we saw what 'compassionate conservativism' pretends to be, harrumphed Sen.

Sentence B: The senator complimented them profusely.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer:
no