Teacher: Generate an explanation for the given claim using the provided supporting material from the paragraph. Please consider the following points while generating an output. 1) The claim will always have supporting proof in the paragraph, and the paragraph will have a clear point of view supporting the claim. 2) There can be instances where direct correlation to the claim is not available. Make use of the sentences in the paragraph to provide a corresponding output supporting the claim. 3) The explanation should be at least one and at most twelve sentences long.
Teacher: Now, understand the problem? If you are still confused, see the following example:
Paragraph: "Although the story didn't cite the cost of appendectomy emergency or urgent surgery and we wish it had, we nonetheless will give it a satisfactory score because it at least cited what the editorial writer wrote, ""A secondary benefit is the savings to the hospital generated by minimizing staff and anesthesiologist presence late in the evening and during the wee hours of the morning."" As with our harms score above, although the story didn't give absolute numbers, in this case we think it was sufficient for it to report that ""The scientists found no significant difference among the groups in the patients' condition 30 days after surgery or in the length of their operation or hospital stay."" Although the story didn't give absolute numbers, in this case we think it was sufficient for it to report that ""The scientists found no significant difference among the groups in the patients' condition 30 days after surgery or in the length of their operation or hospital stay."" Despite running less than 300 words, this story did an adequate job in explaining the quality of the evidence, including pointing out limitations. No disease-mongering here. The story meets the bare minimum requirement for this criterion in that it at least cited what an editorial stated. The focus of the story was on a study comparing emergency appendectomy with surgery done up to 12 hours later or beyond. This is the whole focus of the story and one we applaud when it begins: ""Appendectomy is the most common emergency surgery in the world, but it doesn't have to be."" There were no claims made about the novelty of this research, and we may have wished for a bit more context on this. Nonetheless, the potential for guiding future care decisions was made clear. Not applicable. Given that the story only pulled excerpts from the journal article and the accompanying editorial, and didn't include any fresh quotes from interviews, we can't be sure of the extent to which it may have been influenced by a news release.". Claim: Some appendicitis cases may not require 'emergency' surgery
Solution: We really don't understand why only a handful of mainstream news organizations reported this story. (At least in what we found.) The most common emergency surgery in the world. Rushing to emergency surgery may not carry any benefit. Waiting a few hours may be safer and less expensive. Why is that not a story? We applaud USA Today for finding time and space and clearly it didn't need to free up much space to do a good job telling the story. The story explains that as many as 300,0 appendectomies are done each year in the US. That figure alone explains why this is an important study to report.
Reason: The output is an analysis of the claim while considering the paragraph as a reference. The output highlights the key features presented in the paragraph and explains the claim accordingly.

Now, solve this instance: Paragraph: The coffin, one of three brought the same morning, came hours after officials said 13 elderly residents had diedin the home since March 11 and that more than 80 others were believedto have the coronavirus. Most of the dead were aged over 90, an official at the regional healthauthority told Reuters. Authorities have not been able to establish the cause of death in most cases. "The deliveries are non-stop. There are going to be more on Monday," the delivery man said as he removed the casket's plastic cover. The facility in Paris' 12th district is one of several care homes across France to be hit by thecoronavirus outbreak. There have been large numbers of deaths too at retirement homes in Italy and Spain. Almost 1 million people reside in care homes in France. In the Paris region alone, the regional health authority saysthat 148 out of the 700 homes in its network have reported coronavirus cases and at least 61 residents have died. The Rothschild Foundation home in Paris was put on red alerton March 6 as the epidemic took hold. Staff were givenstricter entry protocols, told to wear gloves and masks atall times, disinfect everything and urged to isolate suspectedcases. "We knew it was coming. The first two people with symptoms weretested and then isolated, but once it was established that theyhad it, we stopped testing because it's then a cluster. Youcan't allow it to spread," said a health worker aware of the situation. Since then all residents have been confinedto their rooms where they are fed and washed. But whilethe number of new cases has slowed, the deaths continue. Executives at the home did not respond to Reuters phone calls seeking detailed information about what was happening in the home, but in a brief exchange, one executive described the situation at the facility as very tough. France's official coronavirus death toll stands at some 1,100 people, but that does not include deaths outside hospitals. Fatalities in nursing homes have surged recently with dozens of deaths reported across the country. "When you don't have enough staff andequipment and need to care for fragile people then itleads to a high mortality rate. When it enters into a nursinghome, you are going to see 20% of residents die," saidThierry Amouroux, a nurse and representative at the NationalUnion for Professional Nurses. Seniorcare home representatives warned the Health Minister in a letter seen by Reutersthat workers in the homes needed 500,000 masks. At least 100,000 people could die if the situation was not brought under control, they wrote. Jerome Larche, an intensive care doctor in Montpellier, whosecompany also operates care homes, said it was critical to avoid mass contaminations. "Mostof the residents can't be taken to intensive careso if there are contaminations, there will be deaths," Larche said. At the Bergeron-Grenier care home in western France, half of carershave opted to confine themselves within the home to reduce the risk of spreading the coronavirus. "Before, we were always afraid. No matter how careful wewere, we still had this fear of infecting our residents bybringing the virus from outside," administrative assistantPatricia Vandebrouck said. Claim: 'Delivering coffins non-stop': coronavirus stalks a Paris nursing home.
Student:
Outside a Paris retirement homeon Wednesday, a director rushed out and told the man delivering a coffin to use a side entrance, away from prying eyes.