Q: Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "A big dog shakes itself dry while standing in a creek."
Hypothesis: "A big dog outdoors shaking off water."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
A: If a dog is shaking off water it is shaking itself dry. If the dog is standing in a creek that means the dog is outdoors.
The answer is yes.

QUESTION: Can we conclude from "Two football teams are playing on a football field with the nfl logo." that "A football team scores a touchdown."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell

Let's solve it slowly: Just because football teams are playing does not mean that either team scores a touchdown.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

[QUESTION] Given the sentence "A sun filled area with posters on the cement pillars." is it true that "The posters are well lit."?
Sun filled implies well lit since there is a lot of light.
The answer is yes.

Q: Premise: "Women are riding horses in an arena carrying the flags of canada and the united states."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "People are shown riding horses in an arena." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A: Women are people and therefore can be referred to collectively as either 'Women riding horses' or 'People riding horses'.
The answer is yes.

QUESTION: Given the sentence "A girl in a blue tank top opens a package next to several drinks and a opened can of beans." can we conclude that "A girl returned a package at the post office."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Let's solve it slowly: Opening a package is not the same as returning a package. A post office does not usually have drinks and cans of beans.
The answer is no.

QUESTION: Given the sentence "Two large black dogs run through the snow." is it true that "Dog at play."?

Let's solve it slowly:
Dog at play is not the only reason for dog to be running through the snow.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.