In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.
Example: Comment: President lied under oath about consensual sex...
Not the same thing as rape.
Example solution: Sexual-explicit
Example explanation: This comment explicitly mentions "consensual sex" and "rape", and thus is sexual-explicit.

Problem: Comment: "The department has been monitoring the situation and crafting a spill-response plan with Cooke (Aquaculture), [Ron] Warren said." It is incomprehensible that there is no spill-response plan in place . . . and foreseeable that this escapement is probable with any operation. Why aren't aquaculture businesses REQUIRED to have a spill response plan on file, with evidence of the needed repair and recovery equipment on standby? This is about as dumb as it gets. I wonder if the taxpayers of WA state will review Mr. Warren's performance and the responsibilities of his position?
Solution: Non-sexual-explicit