Based on the premise "They suggest growing livestock under cleaner, less confined conditions to prevent contamination of feed and water; slaughtering the animals so bacteria-containing skin and feces never get on food; and using simpler technologies, like steaming, to clean raw meat.", can we conclude the hypothesis "They were advocating for better treatment of the livestock to help prevent contamination. " is true (see options)?

Available options:
(1). yes
(2). it is not possible to tell
(3). no
(1).