Subject: "EEI - Ballot on Article 2.3".

Body: In what I'm sure is an oversight, EEI forgtot to send me a ballot. After appealing for my right to vote, a ballot was forthcoming. I voted "NO" on the proposal. We will see what happens from here.

Subject: "Navy Fly Away Full!".

Body: It is amazing how fast e-mail works. Within 2 minutes of sending out the message saying we had 2 spots open, they were filled! Thank you for your interest. If you would like to be placed on a wait list for either the December 4-6 or 5-7 trips, let me know. Roy Steinhagen

Subject: "Additional Information Needed".

Body: Kay, In going through the contracts assigned to us, I have determined that we do not have all contracts necessary to evaluate our exposure/potential work out of the various transaction. To summarize: 1.Oglethorpe Power Corp.: The Interchange Agreement supplied is expired. Is there an amendment or extension? 2.Ameren Services Company: The contract is sell only (Ameren sells to EPMI), but we have positions in our books whereby Ameren has the obligation to purchase from EPMI. There must be a MPPSA or another contract that allows for purchases as well. Ameren has the obligation to purchase 300-400 MW on-peak for next summer. This one should be a relatively easy sell/assignment to a third party. 3.Connecticut Light & Power: Termination is subject to conditions outlined in the Mid-Connecticut Project Termination, Assignment and Assumption Agreement (I think this is the bigger CRRA agreement). Jim Grace and Sheila Tweed are the responsible parties for the CRRA workout. As this contract is inextricably linked, shouldn't they take over this contract as well? 4.GPU: I believe there are additional contracts out there governing transactions between EPMI and the various GPU subsidiaries. Will you have a search run on the follow company names? GPU Services GPU Energy Jersey Central Power & Light Company Metropolitan Edison Company Pennsylvania Electric Company Thanks!

Subject: "FYI".

Body:
=09I apologize for this e-mail being so late. I know that probably someone= has already sent in an email with this comment, especially during the time= =09you requested the employees let you know how we could all pull together= to improve the outlook that the outside world has on Enron. I had a =09ge= ntleman on our floor a few weeks back, that told me he had worked for Enron= a while back, he said the most damaging thing that hurts Enron in =09the p= ublic eye, is the fact that a person can seldom talk to the same person in = a department more than a few times before their contact in that =09departme= nt moves to another department or leaves. He said it gives the public a fee= ling of insecurity in trusting a company where the employees =09move around= so much. I hope this doesn't upset you, I just thought I would let you kno= w what one gentlemen told me regarding the company. I =09absolutely love th= e foundation that you have built Enron on, and I only hope that more compan= y's follow suit. Have a wonderful day.=20 =09