input question: Ethnographic Case Studies in Federally Funded Multi-disciplinary Policy Some Design and Implementation Issues. If this premise is true, does that tell us:"There were no implementation issues with multi-disciplinary policy that could be identified."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: no

Question:
Based on the premise "They can say that, regardless of what the experts tell us, it's perfectly obvious that cheap care by relatives and neighbors shouldn't become the only feasible alternative for struggling mothers.", can we conclude that "Childcare should be provided by flies."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
no

Question: Sentence A: For example, nitrates account for 20-40 percent of visibility impairment in national parks and wilderness areas in Southern California.

Sentence B: There is no visibility impairment in the wilderness areas of Southern California.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question: Family members were present less than 10% of the time, and their impact on the intervention varied.
Family members were not usually present.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Problem: Here is a premise:
Hates you? I cried, astonished.

Here is a hypothesis:
I don't think he could hate you.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question:
(Mother Teresa cared passionately about animals.)

Does it follow that "Mother Teresa detested animals. "?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
no