[Q] Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "A black horse and blue car crossing a river on water submerged pathways."
Hypothesis: "Instead of the bridge."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
[A] A horse and car go through water because a bridge is deemed unsafe for crossing.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

[Q] Can we conclude from "A man pokes his head out of a window." that "The man would like a better view."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
[A] A better view may not be the reason the man pokes his head out the window.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

[Q] Given the sentence "An african child attempts a headstand on the front of a boat painted blue and white in water next to a field of crops." can we conclude that "An african child attempts a headstand."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
[A] The specific setting of the African child is encompassed in the child's action of attempting a headstand.
The answer is yes.