input question: Well, all right. If this premise is true, does that tell us:"Well, if you say so, then all right."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: it is not possible to tell

Question:
Based on the premise "The Kamehameha line ended with the death of Kamehameha V, in 1872, and the election first of William Lunalilo, then of David Kalakaua in 1874 as Hawaii's constitutional monarch.", can we conclude that "David Kalakaua is Hawaii's constitutional monarch in the year 1874."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
yes

Question: Sentence A: Where's the youthful Byronic madness, the heedless Lucullan feast of endangered bald eagles slow roasted over flaming da Vinci drawings?

Sentence B: Byron was known for promoting anarchy and chaos.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question: Six weeks ago a Times op-ed piece by political scientist Lucian Pye explored the formidable mindset that governs China today.
Six weeks ago a Times op-ed piece by political scientist explored the mindset that governs China today.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Problem: Here is a premise:
In accordance with sections 603(b)(1) and (2), the Commission describes the reasons for the proposed agency actions and its objectives and legal basis.

Here is a hypothesis:
The Commission did not want to reveal any information.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question:
Throughout the story, Ellison uses the symbol of horns, investing them with a number of meanings relating to sexual desire (the horny young boys), artistic creation (the instrument of jazz), and masculinity (the symbol of a bull).

Does it follow that "Ellison uses horns as symbolism related to sexuality."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
yes