Premise:
"Irrational Exuberance"
Hypothesis: The person was irrationally enthusiastic.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

yes

input question: so so where do you go do you go to Berkeley If this premise is true, does that tell us:"Do you go to Harvard?"?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: no

Question:
Based on the premise "D'Onofrio observed that both Project Assert and her project funded by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation provided intervention for multiple behaviors, and that brief interventions for all behaviors were based on the same principles.", can we conclude that "Brief interventions have been shown to be ineffective in cases like this."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
it is not possible to tell

Question: Sentence A: Local news panders to viewers by showing crime and disaster footage, ignoring education and politics.

Sentence B: Education and politics is what is constantly featured in local news.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question: Further, farmworkers may not know how to contact legal services in their community or may be discouraged by their employer from contacting legal services in their community.
Farmworkers may not contact legal services because their bosses may threatened them.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Problem: Here is a premise:
At their press conference after the Senate verdict, several House prosecutors interrupted their sermons against the polls to point out where the public agreed with them.

Here is a hypothesis:
After the Senate verdict, some House prosecutors indicated where the public was on their side.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer:
yes