Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.

[EX Q]: The money = speech plus corporations = people are monumental mistakes. For me it's a matter of fairness and equality. Why should some people/entities get more free speech and influence than anyone else? It feels wrong in the marrow of my bones. It's part of why we are in the mess we are in both nationally and statewide.
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: "It is already Federal law not to have a weapon within 600 feet of a school or a day care center"
.

Nope.

(Though you're right about the ridiculousness of the patchwork, it only applies if the person KNOWS there's a school too close to where s/he is.)

.
First off, it's 1000' (apx. 3 blocks), including on the property & in the buildings, though there are exceptions... including having a CCL from the state in which the school sits.

.
Secondly, that federal "gun-free" school zone law only applies to grades 1-12, not day care centers, not kindergartens, not colleges.
.

For the actual federal law giving the definitions, see 18USC921 (25) and (26) here:

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/921

.
For the federal "gun-free" school zone law itself, see 18USC922(q)(2):

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/922
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: Here's the real news: "The news out of last night's Oil Tax & Oil Company Tax Credit bill debate is - well - Alaskans lost. As modest as the Governor's bill was (left us with a very low 5% Production tax even if oil prices double), this bill leaves Alaska with tax credits that far exceed our Oil Production Tax. The latter raises less than we get for hunting and fishing licenses in 3 of the next 4 years. I hope you agree you deserve better." (Rep. Gara) THE REPUBLICAN LEGISLATORS HAVE ONCE AGAIN SOLD ALASKA OUT. REMEMBER THIS IN THE AUGUST PRIMARY & NOVEMBER GENERAL ELECTION. TIME TO RID OURSELVES OF THESE BOUGHT AND PAID FOR POLITICIANS.
[EX A]:
No