In this task, you are given books product reviews in English language. The goal is to classify the review as "POS" if the overall sentiment of the review is positive or as "NEG" if the overall sentiment of the review is negative.

Ex Input:
Good idea didn't translate into a book . I like the idea that Michael Lewis wrote this book/article to defend a man whose coaching techniques are clearly out of style in todays world of my child this and my child that. Having said that I did not like this book: 1) the writing was chopping and hard to follow at times. i had to re-read many sentences to understand lewis' point. 2) the story lacked the depth of lewis' other wonderful books - where's the who/why/what that lewis used to moneyball (and others) educational - i wanted the story behind the story. 3) who were all the pictures of? i found them distracting... i'll continue to read lewis' books bu thope the next one is bette

Ex Output:
NEG

Ex Input:
Shocked. Stunned. Horrified. . I realize that Patterson is known for his exciting, page-turning reads. I realize that he is famous for the relentless pace of his novels. And, most importantly, I realize that he is famous for stunning twists at the endings of lots of his books. Keeping all that in mind, I have to say that I was shocked and hurt by the, well, absolutely horrifying surprise ending to this book. To say it came at me out of left field would be a massive understatement. It's more like I was standing at home plate in Dodger stadium and was hit by a ball thrown from left field in Yankee Stadium. Truthfully, I never saw it coming. And I was horrified by it. I finished the last pages with my mouth hanging open. And I feel betrayed as well. I realize that twist endings happen often, especially when it comes to Patterson, but I DID NOT LIKE this one. I felt hurt by it. Putting that aside, it was a good read overall, which is why I give it 2 stars instead of one

Ex Output:
NEG

Ex Input:
Breathtaking . I don't know how I missed this jewel until now, but I'm glad I finally found it. I haven't been this moved by a work of fiction in a long, long time. I found myself so drawn to Charlie and to what was happening to him, to his longing for acceptance and love, and to his quest to make sense of his world. The desire for acceptance and love--from oneself and from others--is something all people have in common regardless their IQ. I cried as Charlie regressed, all the while knowing what was happening to him, realizing the profundity of his loss, yet finally being grateful for the short period of intellect and what that contributed to science. I can't disagree more with the reviewer who says the book's ending was predictable. For a while, I thought the book would be about the trick of combining great intellect with human love. When Fay put the female mouse in with Algernon, I kept waiting to see if this theme would be played out, first with the mouse, later with Charlie. One possible ending would have been to let Charlie have his high IQ but, unlike Algernon, be able to integrate intellect with emotion. Another ending would have been to go back to the lower IQ, and have a completely sterile existence devoid of anyone. This of course did not happen as the people at the bakery also showed growth by the book's end and were able to truly take Charlie in and befriend him. I think the author came up with a good ending by causing Charlie to lose the intellect, but to have gained self-love and the love of others, things he did not have at the start of his journey.

Ex Output:
POS