In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.
--------
Question: Comment: I agree, take his life.

Answer: Threat

Question: Comment: It's too bad we can't just execute them.

Answer: Threat

Question: Comment: I think your multi-faceted rhetorical repitoire would be quite impressive to most. But, to me, your comment above is akin to the cheapest of cheap tricks--similar to your "profession", aka spin doctoring:)--in it's completely transparent use of the first refuge of scoundrels: cherry-picking parts of quotes out of context, and then spinning them to make patently obvious and false "straw man" arguments that, as usual in your case, sound superficially clever--at least to yourself (because, after all, you never fail to "like" your own comments:)

I also acknowledge how difficult it must have been for you to admit I might have superior knowledge about anything, in contrast to your half-baked and purportedly omniscient stereotypying of nearly everything. I hope that superficial act of humility was not too painful for your otherwise impervious sense of self-certitude:) So I'll finish in kind, by paraphrasing Shakespeare: First, we kill all the lawyers. Next we kill all the PR flacks!:)

Answer:
Threat