The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the self-need strategy, otherwise output No. self-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to create a personal need for an item in the negotiation, such as by pointing out that the participant sweats a lot to show preference towards water packages.

Q: Context: '😮Sound good enough but since you know i can not do without having anything to sustain me whenever i am thirsty then i suggest you are free to take TWO of the water and since your food has also been stolen by bears and you don't make much left, then you can have the TWO of the food items too and leave the THREE firewood for me with ONE food. How does that sound? 🙂' 'I think we are getting very close to a good deal. Would you be willing to give me ONE firewood in case the stuff I have gets wet?' 'I strongly agree and shall we call it a deal now? 🙂'
Utterance: 'Like I said, we are close but I really would feel better with just one of the firewood. I'm afraid of not being able to build a fire. If you really need the firewood, however, then I would take one additional item of EITHER the water or food instead.'

A: Yes
****
Q: Context: 'I was thinking I will take all the food and water. You can have the firewood. ' 'that's not going to work for me. I need to keep at least 2 foods and 1 firewood but you can have all the water.' 'Are you most interested in the food? 😮'
Utterance: 'yeah I didn't pack enough for my trip, so I'm a little worried about my supplies.'

A: Yes
****
Q: Context: 'How about you take 1 firewood, I''l take 2 and with food, you can have 2 and I'll take one package. I have two very hungry boys!' 'Is there a reason you want the 2:1 split? Food my group's largest priority by a large margin (We eat a lot). It's worth a lot more to my group then the firewood would be.' 'That's why I would like to give you 2 and I will take 1 food. I have 8 and 10 year old boys.🙂'
Utterance: 'I'm interested in hearing more about why you want a 2/1 split: Is the food worth more to you than the third firewood? If so, I'm happy to do that split, but I'd like 3 water in return.'

A:
No
****