Q: If Prudie is not a betting parlor, but she sympathizes with you, having had her own doubts about that speech., can we say that "Prudie was pretty sure that speech was inauthentic."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A: it is not possible to tell

Premise:
"No hoss, no nothin'."
Hypothesis: No horse, no nothing.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

yes

input question: He now felt that Tuppence was all that was noble and disinterested. If this premise is true, does that tell us:"He felt Tuppence was noble but he didn't want to mention that to anyone."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: it is not possible to tell

Question:
Based on the premise "The advice from the attorney to the client and the advocacy by the attorney to the courts cannot be classified as governmental speech even under a generous understanding of the concept.", can we conclude that "The advice between attorney and client is governmental speech."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
no

Question: Sentence A: yeah they're not really that bad but i don't know like i said it's it's still not practical for me i have a hard time looking at cars like that because i think now there's no way i can do that

Sentence B: Its a breeze to look at cars because it's practical for me.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question: Sentence A: increasingly reliant on computer systems to support critical operations and infrastructures, such as telecommunications, power distribution, financial services, emergency services, national defense, and critical government operations.

Sentence B: Computer systems are capable of supporting power distribution.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer:
yes