We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control) into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[EX Q]: Sent1: Do you think that private companies should be able to restrict freedom of speech as well as any other parts of the constitution?
Sent2: The medium of 'free speech' has changed, but that does not affect that free speech should still exist - just as with the other constitutional points (with a few exceptions, if you believe Bush).
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: At the time the constitution was written, the militia, which was to be armed with privately owned weapons, was supposed to be our nations primary military force.
Sent2: It was felt by many (not all) at the time that such weapons were not military weapons and thus did not fall under the protection of the Second Amendment or the right to bear arms in their own state constitutions.
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: People constantly trumpet about how having a gun means that they can protect themselves, but first they must be able to fire the gun on another human being, something that most people find hard to do.
Sent2: If people are going to carry guns for protection, they should be encouraged to put lots and lots of rounds through the gun.
[EX A]:
Not similar