I go away for a day and come back to yet another $40 million of PGE exposure. I guess the lesson is to not go away. Where does this end? This is a painful way to learn about derivative credit exposure. Please inform all "deal doers" at EES that they better have RAC review their deals (Mercury) in detail before they sign. This is more out of control than anything else we have at Enron. Rick
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: Another $40 Million?
Hello everyone! I hope you're all as excited as we are! We're very anxious to see everyone :-) We have pondered the idea of the Bachelor/Bachelorette party, and we both would rather have all our friends together, rather than seperate. So we hope you will all join us on Friday November 30th at 8:00 PM 655 Baker St. #BB103 Costa Mesa 92626 We will meet there, then carpool/tailgate to the Four Seasons Hotel in Newport Beach for an evening of drinks, desserts, and jazz. Please reply and let us know you'll be coming. We hope to see everyone there! :-) Adnan & Maylynn
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: Bachelor/Bachelorette
Attached for your review and comments is Enron's Answer to Motion for Partial Summary Disposition by the Texas, New Mexico and Arizona full-requirements shippers in the complaint proceeding that they filed in July (RP01-486). The shippers have asked the Commission to (a) summarily determine that El Paso's mainline capacity is not adequate to serve its existing firm customers and (b) expeditiously establish a remedy phase in this proceeding. Enron's answer reiterates the comments it filed in the original proceeding, namely that the Commission should consolidate this proceeding with the complaint filed in RP01-484 by the Joint Complainants (producers, California LDCs) which also deals with issues of adequacy of capacity. We also reiterate and emphasize our original proposal that the Commission require El Paso to immediately give existing firm shippers the opportunity to turn back capacity they no longer need as one means of making additional capacity available to those who need more. You do not need to respond, but if you desire to, please get any comments back to me or Leslie by noon tomorrow. Thanks.
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: Please Respond by 12 noon CDT Friday, Sept. 21 -- El Paso Proceeding
First order of business. Again, we can discuss this on Monday. I think Ben (or one of his minions) called Carolyn and asked her to be on a telephone call today. I have reacted with righteous indignation, and Carlos is going to tell her it is not necessary for her to be on the call. I really hadn't intended for Carolyn to work on this transaction. Talk to you Monday. Kay
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer:
Revised Exclusivity Letter