[QUESTION] Can we conclude from "A child wearing a red shirt is eating a piece of food." that "A child is wearing a red shirt and putting food in its mouth."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
Eating a piece of food means putting food in its mouth.
The answer is yes.

Q: Premise: "A little blond girl going up a hill."
Hypothesis: "A little blonde girl is on a boat."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
A: A girl going up a hill could not have been on a boat.
The answer is no.

QUESTION: Premise: "Men sit outside in front a craft kiosk."
Hypothesis: "The people are inside the theater."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?

Let's solve it slowly: They can not be outside a kiosk and inside a theater at the same time.
The answer is no.

[QUESTION] Given the sentence "Two people sit in the distance on an unusual rock formation." is it true that "A woman sitting next to tv."?
A woman is not two people. One cannot be simultaneously sitting on an unusual rock formation and sitting next to TV.
The answer is no.

Q: Premise: "Blond man in printed shirt about to perform."
Hypothesis: "Someone is ready to act."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
A: The blond man might not be very ready for his performance.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

[QUESTION] Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "A dog is running away from another dog."
Hypothesis: "A dog chases another dog off its property."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
Just because aa dog is running away does not mean a dog chases it. Just because a dog is running away does not mean it is chased off its property by another dog.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.