Here is an email: Pat, Attached is a draft of a Master Agreement for your review. Please give me a call after you have had a chance to review the enclosed. Regards,
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: Agreement
Q: Attention Blackberry User: You are receiving this notification to alert you that e-mail services to your Blackberry device will be unavailable between the hours of 8:45 a.m. and 12 midnight CST on Sunday, November 25th for maintenance. During this outage, email services to the Blackberry handheld will be interrupted, however, pin-to-pin paging will not be affected. If you have additional questions regarding this outage, please contact the North American Resolution Center at 713-853-1411. Thanks for your cooperation and understanding, Enron Global Messaging
Propose a subject line
A: Blackberry Outage
IN: Attached is the spreadsheet of those attending the Transwestern Update Mtg. names highlighted in BLUE are people who will be attending the TRAINING session. Thanks,

Generate a subject line.

OUT: TW Attendee Spreadsheet
IN: This is an email
Community Relations brought the Matching Gift and Volunteer Incentive Programs into the 21st Century - the programs are now on-line! Congratulations to the following individuals, who won the Enron Matching Gift Program Contest! Each of them was able to designate $1,000 to up to two charities of their choice. Michelle Cash chose The Post Oak School. Rita Homan chose Juvenile Diabetes Foundation of Omaha and The St. Pius/St. Leo Educational Trust Fund. Harald Jensen chose Tejas Home for Youth and The United Way of the Texas Gulf Coast. Heather Johnson chose Urban Business Initiative. Rebecca Skupin chose Stages Repertory Theatre. If you would like to make a donation to an eligible non-profit organization and have Enron match it dollar-for-dollar, please log onto cr.enron.com and then click on Matching Gift and VIP.

What is the subject?

OUT: Enron Matching Gift Program Winners
QUESTION: Larry: HE 13 EDT - Original deal made for 50 MW @ $82.20 - Hourly P&L notes deal was cut at 12:15 and therefore only 13 MW flowed as confirmed by PJM data - Tag review indicates flow started at 12:15 and ended at HE 13 (38 MW flow) - Settlements is requesting this be revised back to 50MW @ $60/MW - I need input from you regarding this deal to determine the action required. Please provide any helpful info you have as soon as possible. HE 10 EDT - Just an FYI that the purchase price was changed to $41/MW from $42 at the request of Exelon to our Settlements group. I went ahead and changed it due to the low value and because it is in our favor. If you disagree with this or have any questions, please let me know. Thanks,
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: 705512.1 - 07/24/01
IN: Lara: I have rather hastily put this list together. For that I apologize. Hope it is helpful. The things on the list are ones that you've likely already considered. Nevertheless, some of the issues we face in California include: 1. POWER PLANTS The utilities' subs are building power plants; competitors (like Enron) are also trying to develop plants to sell power into both wholesale and retail markets. The utilities control the interconnection of plants to the grid. The interconnection rules are currently so vague and ambiguous, that the utility could quite easily favor its generation sub over competitors. This would have an effect on prices at both the wholesale and retail level (i.e., how do we know we've gotten the best generation deal if the utility can favor its subs plants via interconnection?). 2. DISTRIBUTED GENERATION And the same goes for DG: in California many are pointing to DG as a viable solution to the price spikes. If the utility loses sales because a customer has installed DG on her premises as a hedge against price spikes, the utility will have an incentive to thwart interconnection of the DG unit. (Recall that in many places, recovery of distribution costs is derived from kwh sales; and if sales go down, so can recovery of the utilities' distribution-related costs). In addition, if someone attempts to install DG at the grid level (as opposed to on-site DG) and sell the DG power in wholesale and retail markets, the utility has the ability to frustrate the DG project via interconnection. This permits the utility to retain bundled service customers. Utility control of DG Interconnection can also permit the utility to favor its DG subs. 3. INTERCONNECTION/VOLTAGE BUY-UP And the same goes for the retail level---remember how SDG&E used

Generate a subject line.

OUT:
Rick's Panel on Wholesale/Retail Market Power Issues