Sentence 1: By throwing it on some one else.

Sentence 2: By incriminating someone else.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question:
It also grows a much-vaunted species of garlic, sold locally in strung bouquets.

Does it follow that "It does not grow any garlic."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
no

Q: If No, No. In all probability the young lady is with other relations. The doctor was not completely satisfied, but he saw that Sir James was determined to say no more, and realized that to try and extract more information from the famous K.C., can we say that "Sir James was not going to speak any more about the spooky vampires."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A: it is not possible to tell

Premise:
"In-room CD equipment with selection of music."
Hypothesis: There is no music offered.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

no

input question: What he said, replied Julius dryly. If this premise is true, does that tell us:""I can't agree with what he's saying."Julius said dryly."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: no

Q: If A rural carrier can serve a cluster of boxes much faster than if the individual boxes were spread out along the route where the carrier would have to slow down, stop, and accelerate for each one., can we say that "A rural carrier delivers slower to cluster boxes than mail boxes."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A:
no