The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.

Input: Consider Input: Context: 'I am walking away, completely unfair' 'You haven't offered anything and walking away means you get nothing so that doesn't seem like an option' 'You can have ALL the water, and 1 firewood'
Utterance: 'If you want two firewoods, i will need some of the food. My family maybe cold, we can't be cold and hungry. I need at least 1 food '

Output: Yes

Input: Consider Input: Context: 'Oh, I see what you did there. No problem I have plenty of firewood for you buddy. 🙂' 'Great! What extra supplies would you like to bring?' 'Since it's hot there, I get thirsty and dry real quick. 😡'
Utterance: 'Oh ok, well I plan on bringing some juice, beer and other drinks. So I could spare some extra water. And I am pretty good at fishing, so I won't need much food either'

Output: No

Input: Consider Input: Context: 'Sure I am waiting too!' 'So tell me, which is most important to you? What can't you live without?' 'The most important is water because I have kidney problem so i need some more water.Without water I can't live.'
Utterance: 'I understand that completely. Would you be willing to take 2 waters, and I take 1 water? I still do need some water for my family. I can't have anyone getting heat stroke. But you can have more.'
Output: Yes