In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

Ex Input:
Comment: Nothing worse than being trapped in a car with an old wet large dog with bad breath panting in your face on a muggy and rainy august afternoon. You can enjoy your dogs.

Ex Output:
Non-identity-attack

Ex Input:
Comment: Start by kicking islamics out of Canada....this is a christian country. No place for satanic hordes of hell!

Ex Output:
Identity-attack

Ex Input:
Comment: I get that this is an opinion article, but I prefer pieces that take a more balanced view.

It's unlikely that anyone but a fool ever maintained that curbing food waste by redistributing edible but rejected food to the hungry had the potential to end poverty. It can't.

But the poor need to be fed, and using what would otherwise be wasted is far from a new concept. Many urban poor and not-so-poor have taken matters into their own hands by dumpster diving.

No, we won't end poverty by curtailing food waste, but feeding people and reducing landfill is far from a bad idea.

Ex Output:
Non-identity-attack