In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Example Input: Comment: Those of you who write about enviro-hypocrisy and such, please help me out. Just so I know ...

1. People file a lawsuit because they worry about ozone layers, climate change, species going extinct, polar ice melting, glaciers disappearing and all that. They didn't blow something up or burn something down, they went straight to the channels our society provides for, all orderly and appropriate. What should they do? Just shut up? Because we know better?

2. Is there any concern for the environment that isn't what you call enviro-hypocrisy? Can a person who lives like the rest of us (drives a car, dresses in clothes, lives in a house, consumes electricity, and exists as a normal person) still want public policies that might slow down the trend without being a hypocrite? Or are only people who run around dressed in leaves and sleeping on the ground entitled to care about these things?
Example Output: Non-obscene

Example Input: Comment: ...whew, I thought Glenn Beck was just a simple nut, you however sound like King Cashew.
Example Output: Non-obscene

Example Input: Comment: "Alaska has a homegrown racist problem?" Uh-- which part of what Mr. Spooner said was "racist," again? The PFD incentives people to stay here and he is not the first to espouse that if the PFD went away tomorrow, many people would move out of state. Be a little less 'snowflake,' S.S.-- not everything people you disagree with say is "racist" or a "micro-aggression."
Example Output:
Non-obscene