Question:
Based on the premise "The industry argues that it is not comparable to the (heavily taxed) telecommunications industry, and that such efforts result in double taxation--since service providers already pay taxes on phone-line usage--as well as for Internet vendors.", can we conclude that "The industry agrees that they should be considered telecommunications, and taxed as such."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
no

Question: Sentence A: you know it's it's women's rights and the and and that sort of movement and so it's uh quite the opposite so elections start getting very uh the elections where they have that topic seem to be a little bit better attended than some of the other ones

Sentence B: All the topics are attended the same amount.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question: She had them all fitted with little neural clamps; flashing blue and green lights, stapled to each rodent cranium.
The rodents were fitted with red and yellow lights.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Problem: Here is a premise:
What might have been a one-trauma-after-another chronicle of loss and divorce, says Walter Kirn in the New York Times Book Review , becomes instead a hard and shining artifact of personal and social upheaval.

Here is a hypothesis:
Divorce can be an artifact of personal and social upheaval.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Sentence 1: My thoughts of mankind were kindly and charitable.

Sentence 2: My ideas of humanity reflected altruism.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: yes

Premise:
"Amusing roadside Americana is basically a bad restaurant in the shape of a big chicken."
Hypothesis: Americana is amusing but it is a bad restaurant.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
yes