instruction:
In this task, you're given a statement, and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence clearly disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3' corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.
question:
Statement: An attorney representing a client before judge and jury was no longer the norm of a case when delivering critical legal services to low-income individuals. Choices: 1. Attorneys representing low-income individuals are the norm. 2. The norm of the case was violated when the attorney delivered their services. 3. Low-income individuals are often targeted by the justice system because of their inability to finance their legal battles.
answer:
1

question:
Statement: Personal Communication with S.Kumar, FLS miljo, September 2001. Choices: 1. Personal communication with s Kumar. 2. S Kumar is a good communicator. 3. No communication from s Kumar.
answer:
3

question:
Statement: The presence language appeared in the LSC appropriations act as part of an effort to expand LSC representation to aliens other than lawful residents, and does not appear to have been intended to limit LSC representation to aliens who were continuously physically present in the United States. Choices: 1. LSC itended to limit representation of aliens in the United States. 2. The aliens were from all over the world. 3. Aliens were physically present in the United States.
answer:
1