Detailed Instructions: In this task, you are given text for US Congressional and California state bills, your task is to generate a summary for this bill.
See one example below:
Problem: SECTION 1. LIABILITY OF BUSINESS ENTITIES PROVIDING USE OF FACILITIES
TO NONPROFIT ORGANIZATIONS.

(a) Definitions.--In this section:
(1) Business entity.--The term ''business entity'' means a
firm, corporation, association, partnership, consortium, joint
venture, or other form of enterprise.
(2) Facility.--The term ''facility'' means any real
property, including any building, improvement, or appurtenance.
(3) Gross negligence.--The term ''gross negligence'' means
voluntary and conscious conduct by a person with knowledge (at
the time of the conduct) that the conduct is likely to be
harmful to the health or well-being of another person.
(4) Intentional misconduct.--The term ''intentional
misconduct'' means conduct by a person with knowledge (at the
time of the conduct) that the conduct is harmful to the health
or well-being of another person.
(5) Nonprofit organization.--The term ''nonprofit
organization'' means--
(A) any organization described in section 501(c)(3)
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and exempt from
tax under section 501(a) of such Code; or
(B) any not-for-profit organization organized and
conducted for public benefit and operated primarily for
charitable, civic, educational, religious, welfare, or
health purposes.
(6) State.--The term ''State'' means each of the several
States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto
Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, the Northern
Mariana Islands, any other territory or possession of the
United States, or any political subdivision of any such State,
territory, or possession.
(b) Limitation on Liability.--
(1) In general.--Subject to subsection (c), a business
entity shall not be subject to civil liability relating to any
injury or death occurring at a facility of the business entity
in connection with a use of such facility by a nonprofit
organization if--
(A) the use occurs outside of the scope of business
of the business entity;
(B) such injury or death occurs during a period
that such facility is used by the nonprofit
organization; and
(C) the business entity authorized the use of such
facility by the nonprofit organization.
(2) Application.--This subsection shall apply--
(A) with respect to civil liability under Federal
and State law; and
(B) regardless of whether a nonprofit organization
pays for the use of a facility.
(c) Exception for Liability.--Subsection (b) shall not apply to an
injury or death that results from an act or omission of a business
entity that constitutes gross negligence or intentional misconduct,
including any misconduct that--
(1) constitutes a crime of violence (as that term is
defined in section 16 of title 18, United States Code) or act
of international terrorism (as that term is defined in section
2331 of title 18) for which the defendant has been convicted in
any court;
(2) constitutes a hate crime (as that term is used in the
Hate Crime Statistics Act (28 U.S.C. 534 note));
(3) involves a sexual offense, as defined by applicable
State law, for which the defendant has been convicted in any
court; or
(4) involves misconduct for which the defendant has been
found to have violated a Federal or State civil rights law.
(d) Superseding Provision.--
(1) In general.--Subject to paragraph (2) and subsection
(e), this Act preempts the laws of any State to the extent that
such laws are inconsistent with this Act, except that this Act
shall not preempt any State law that provides additional
protection from liability for a business entity for an injury
or death with respect to which conditions under subparagraphs
(A) through (C) of subsection (b)(1) apply.
(2) Limitation.--Nothing in this Act shall be construed to
supersede any Federal or State health or safety law.
(e) Election of State Regarding Nonapplicability.--This Act shall
not apply to any civil action in a State court against a business
entity in which all parties are citizens of the State if such State
enacts a statute--
(1) citing the authority of this subsection;
(2) declaring the election of such State that this Act
shall not apply to such civil action in the State; and
(3) containing no other provision.
Solution: Shields a business entity from civil liability relating to any injury or death occurring at a facility of that entity in connection with a use of such facility by a nonprofit organization if: (1) the use occurs outside the scope of business of the business entity; (2) such injury or death occurs during a period that such facility is used by such organization; and (3) the business entity authorized the use of such facility by the organization.
Makes this Act inapplicable to an injury or death that results from an act or omission of a business entity that constitutes gross negligence or intentional misconduct, including misconduct that: (1) constitutes a hate crime or a crime of violence or act of international terrorism for which the defendant has been convicted in any court; or (2) involves a sexual offense for which the defendant has been convicted in any court or misconduct for which the defendant has been found to have violated a Federal or State civil rights law.
Preempts State laws to the extent that such laws are inconsistent with this Act, except State law that provides additional protection from liability. Specifies that this Act shall not be construed to supersede any Federal or State health or safety law.
Makes this Act inapplicable to any civil action in a State court against a business entity in which all parties are citizens of the State if such State, citing this Act's authority and containing no other provision, enacts a statute declaring the State's election that this Act shall not apply to such action in the State.
Explanation: This Bill focuses on shielding business entities from civil liability relating to an injury or death depending on the conditions of injury, hence the generated summary is correct.

Problem: SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ''Joint Antitrust Consultative
Commission Act''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

The Congress finds as follows:
(1) Antitrust laws are an important legal tool for opening
markets to international competition and defusing trade
tension.
(2) All nations should make it a priority to enact and
vigorously enforce strong competition laws to benefit
consumers, encourage international competition and foster
growth in jobs, productivity, and investment.
(3) Japanese antimonopoly law is similar to United States
antitrust law, partly as a result of its formulation during
America's post-World War II occupation of Japan. However, there
are observable differences in the respective antitrust
enforcement environments of Japan and the United States.
(4) In Japan--
(A) the lenient interpretation and enforcement of
the antimonopoly law is insufficient to prevent
business practices which result in significant barriers
to foreign entry into the Japanese market;
(B) private antitrust lawsuits are very difficult
to file and virtually impossible to win in Japan
because of strict requirements stipulating proof of
damages;
(C) due to political and bureaucratic pressures,
criminal prosecution of antitrust violations rarely
occurs in Japan;
(D) many cartels are exempted and legal under the
antimonopoly law in Japan. The large number of exempted
and legal cartels contributes to an environment in
which illegal cartels become less subject to criticism
and scrutiny; and
(E) the Japan Fair Trade Commission's capacity to
enforce antimonopoly law is limited by the small size
of its staff and the status of the Commission in the
hierarchy of Japanese bureaucracies.
(5) In the United States--
(A) corporations may be apprehensive about
participating in certain business activities such as
joint ventures or exclusive distributorship
arrangements due to uncertainties concerning the
enforcement of antitrust law; and
(B) the cost of antitrust litigation, including the
risk of treble damages, may have a negative impact on
United States corporate competitiveness.

SEC. 3. PURPOSES.

The purposes of this Act are--
(1) to encourage a review of the antitrust policies of
Japan and the United States in the context of a changing global
economy and to foster ways of improving competition in both
countries;
(2) to encourage the Japan Fair Trade Commission and the
United States Department of Justice and United States Federal
Trade Commission toward more comparable levels of enforcement
activity;
(3) to ensure that the Japan Fair Trade Commission
increasingly enforces the antimonopoly law based upon antitrust
principles of protecting competition;
(4) to encourage Japan to end unfair business practices
that result in market foreclosure to foreign competition;
(5) to increase awareness of criminal antitrust enforcement
as a means of addressing anticompetitive business behavior in
Japan;
(6) to encourage the government of Japan to increase the
investigative power of the Japan Fair Trade Commission; and
(7) to encourage the government of Japan to reduce the
number of cartels exempted from the antimonopoly law.

SEC. 4. DEFINITIONS.

In this Act--
''antimonopoly law'' means codes enforced by the Japan Fair
Trade Commission to promote fair and free competition by
prohibiting private monopolization, unreasonable restraint of
trade, and unfair business practices.
''antitrust policy'' means the general principles by which
government is guided in maintaining competition in commercial
activities.
''antitrust law'' means the body of statutes, court
decisions, and other law designed to ensure the existence of
competition in commercial activities. Antitrust law in the
United States protects trade and commerce from unlawful
restraints such as price fixing, exclusive dealings, and
monopolies.
''Commission'' means the United States-Japan Joint
Antitrust Consultative Commission established by section 5.

SEC. 5. JOINT ANTITRUST CONSULTATIVE COMMISSION.

(a) Establishment.--There is established the ''United States-Japan
Joint Antitrust Consultative Commission''.
(b) American Delegation.--
(1) Membership.--The American delegation to the Commission
shall be composed of the following members:
(A) Members of Congress:
(i) The chairman of the Committee on
Finance of the Senate, or the chairman's
designee.
(ii) The ranking minority member of the
Committee on Finance of the Senate, or the
ranking minority member's designee.
(iii) The chairman of the Committee on Ways
and Means of the House of Representatives, or
the chairman's designee.
(iv) The ranking minority member of the
Committee on Ways and Means of the House of
Representatives, or the ranking minority
member's designee.
(v) The chairman of the Committee on the
Judiciary of the Senate, or the chairman's
designee.
(vi) The ranking minority member of the
Committee on the Judiciary of the Senate, or
the ranking minority member's designee.
(vii) The chairman of the Committee on the
Judiciary of the House of Representatives, or
the chairman's designee.
(viii) The ranking minority member of
Committee on the Judiciary of the House of
Representatives, or the ranking minority
member's designee.
(ix) The chairman of the Committee on
Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the
Senate, or the chairman's designee.
(x) The ranking minority member of the
Committee on Commerce, Science and
Transportation of the Senate, or the ranking
minority member's designee.
(xi) The chairman of the Committee on
Energy and Commerce of the House of
Representatives, or the chairman's designee.
(xii) The ranking minority member of the
Committee on Energy and Commerce of the House
of Representatives, or the ranking minority
member's designee.
(B) Executive officers:
(i) The Attorney General, or the Attorney
General's designee.
(ii) The chairman of the Federal Trade
Commission, or the chairman's designee.
(iii) The Secretary of State, or the
Secretary's designee.
(iv) The Secretary of the Treasury, or the
Secretary's designee.
(v) The Secretary of Commerce, or the
Secretary's designee.
(vi) The United States Trade
Representative, or the Trade Representative's
designee.
(2) Lead representative.--(A) The Attorney General, or the
Attorney General's designee, shall be the American delegation's
lead representative.
(B) The lead representative shall--
(i) contact the Japanese lead representative to--
(I) set an agenda for the Commission's
meetings; and
(II) set mutually convenient annual meeting
dates;
(ii) supervise the establishment, procedures, and
structure of the Commission with the Japanese lead
representative, except such procedures shall allow
representatives of industries discussed at such
meetings an opportunity to present their views;
(iii) assemble and maintain the reports, records,
and other papers of the Commission for use by the
American delegation and the public; and
(iv) institute the comprehensive review required by
section 8.
(c) Japanese Delegation.--
(1) Contingency on commencement of activities.--The
commencement of activities under this Act by the American
delegation to the Commission is contingent on the creation by
the appropriate Japanese officials of a Japanese delegation
with representation from an appropriate range of institutions
and interests that participate in antitrust activities in
Japan, as determined by the lead representative of the American
delegation.
(2) Membership.--It is the sense of Congress that the
Japanese delegation should have the same number of members as
the American delegation and be composed of representatives of
public, private, and other organizations involved in antitrust
activities in Japan. It is the sense of the Congress that such
a delegation should at a minimum include the following members:
(A) Members of the Diet:
(i) The chairman of the Budget Committee of
the House of Representatives, or the chairman's
designee.
(ii) The ranking member of the main
opposition party of the Budget Committee of the
House of Representatives, or the ranking
member's designee.
(iii) The Budget Committee chairman of the
House of Councillors, or the chairman's
designee.
(iv) The ranking member of the main
opposition party of the Budget Committee of the
House of Councillors, or the ranking member's
designee.
(v) The chairman of the Commerce Committee
of the House of Representatives, or the
chairman's designee.
(vi) The ranking member of the main
opposition party of the Commerce Committee of
the House of Representatives, or the ranking
member's designee.
(vii) The chairman of the Commerce
Committee of the House of Councillors, or the
chairman's designee.
(viii) The ranking member of the main
opposition party of the Commerce Committee of
the House of Councillors, or the ranking
member's designee.
(ix) The chairman of the Judiciary
Committee of the House of Representatives, or
the chairman's designee.
(x) The ranking member of the main
opposition party of the Judiciary Committee of
the House of Representatives, or the ranking
member's designee.
(xi) The chairman of the Judiciary
Committee of the House of Councillors, or the
chairman's designee.
(xii) The ranking member of the main
opposition party of the Judiciary Committee of
the House of Councillors, or the ranking
member's designee.
(B) Executive officers:
(i) The chairman of the Japan Fair Trade
Commission, or the chairman's designee, and 1
additional commissioner of the chairman's
choice, or that commissioner's designee.
(ii) The Minister of Finance, or the
Minister's designee.
(iii) The Minister of International Trade
and Industry, or the Minister's designee.
(iv) The Minister of Foreign Affairs, or
the Minister's designee.
(v) The Minister of Justice, or the
Minister's designee.
(3) Lead representative.--It is the sense of Congress that
the Prime Minister, or the Prime Minister's designee, should
appoint 1 of the members of the Japanese delegation as a lead
representative to contact the United States lead representative
to--
(A) set an agenda for the Commission's meetings;
(B) set mutually convenient annual meeting dates;
and
(C) perform such other duties as may be assigned to
the lead representative.
(d) Meetings.--The Commission shall convene annually, with the
first meeting to take place in Washington, D.C., in 1994 and the site
of the meeting to alternate thereafter between the United States and
Japan.
(e) Federal Advisory Committee Act.--The Commission shall not be
considered to be an advisory committee under the Federal Advisory
Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App.).

SEC. 6. COMMISSION FUNCTIONS.

The Commission shall--
(1) discuss and make recommendations on long-term
structural differences in antitrust policy and short-term
antitrust disputes; and
(2) serve as an open forum to promote more coherent
enforcement of antitrust law in Japan and the United States.

SEC. 7. REPORT.

The recommendations and findings of the Commission, reflecting the
major views expressed during the deliberations of the Commission, shall
be completed and made public through issuance of a report in English by
the agency from which the lead representative of the American
delegation is selected, not more than 90 days after the Commission
holds its annual meeting. It is the sense of Congress that the Japanese
delegation should issue a Japanese language version of the report at
the same time as the English language report is issued.

SEC. 8. COMPREHENSIVE REVIEW.

The lead representative of the American delegation shall institute
a comprehensive review of the activities and responsibilities of the
Commission not later than 180 days after the second annual meeting of
the Commission to determine--
(1) whether the Commission is carrying out its purpose;
(2) whether consistent with the purposes of this Act,
responsibilities assigned to the Commission should be revised;
and
(3) whether the existence of the Commission should be
continued.

SEC. 9. COMPENSATION.

Members of the American delegation to the Commission shall not be
paid compensation for services performed on the Commission.

SEC. 10. PAYMENT OF EXPENSES.

The expenses of departments and agencies of the executive branch
and of members and committees of the Senate and of the House of
Representatives in carrying out this Act, including travel expenses and
expenses relating to preparation of the report under section 7, shall
be paid out of general funds that are available and not specifically
appropriated for other purposes.
Solution:
Joint Antitrust Consultative Commission Act - Establishes the United States-Japan Joint Antitrust Consultative Commission to: (1) discuss and make recommendations on long-term structural differences in antitrust policy and short-term antitrust disputes; and (2) serve as an open forum to promote more coherent enforcement of antitrust law in Japan and the United States.
Requires the lead representative of the American delegation to institute a comprehensive review of the activities and responsibilities of the Commission within 180 days after its second annual meeting.
Sets forth provisions regarding compensation and payment of expenses.