In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.
--------
Question: Comment: "I also teach them how to honor the ladies they are attracted to by respecting them enough not to want to violate them physically and waiting until they are ready to make a lifelong commitment."
So once you and your "lady" made a lifelong commitment did you physically violate her? Now I see why evangelical Christians like you AlwaysThere, have so wholeheartedly embraced Trump--you have similar values--you wait to "physically violate" until after marriage while Trump doesn't.
"Grab 'em by the p***y. You can do anything." Donald Trump

Answer: Sexual-explicit

Question: Comment: I could've sworn it was tRump's voice on that video/audio tape bragging about his p__y grabbing (I have a vagina clinched in my fat fingers because they like it) escapades.

Answer: Sexual-explicit

Question: Comment: Although I admire Fr. Martin's efforts to build bridges between the LGBT community and the hierarchy, I think he's naive about the bishops desperately wanting to reach out to gays and not being sure how? How? That's easy, at least to start. I would propose the following three very, very initial steps. #1: Hold one (or preferably several) listening sessions with the LGBT community. Have it facilitated well, but, Your Excellencies, shut your mouths!!! Let gays talk about their experience and perhaps, for just a moment - mirabili dictu - they can be your teachers! #2: Allow the gay community to celebrate the Eucharist on Sundays as a community (as in Chicago's AGLO). #3: Establish in your (arch)diocese an office whose explicit purpose is to be about the continuing work of building bridges.

Answer:
Non-sexual-explicit