QUESTION: Here is my attempt at modifying the letter to conform to our discussions this afternoon. The redline markings indicate changes to a clean version of the draft sent yesterday. This draft incorporates a slightly modified version of the confidentiality statement you provided earlier today (changed Parties' to Party, etc.). Please acknowledge receipt. - GulfExpediteLetter2.doc
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: Construction Expedition Letter
Hi Pete, We want the GE form to be on an individual turbine basis. As for work priorities, I would put it in front of the City of Austin agreement. Thanks,
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: GE contract
Per our conversation, I am attaching a proposed form of Unanimous Consent of the Board of Directors of Brant-Allen Industries, Inc. ("Company") that would expand the Consent of Directors given to us when we executed the ISDA Master Agreement in 1998 to do more than just the single trade referenced in that resolution. If the enclosed meets with your approval, please have it executed by the directors of the Company and return a copy to me for our files. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at (713) 853-3399. In addition, can you confirm one thing for me. There is a note in our file that says documents for the Company require two signatures. I looked at the Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws you provided us and find no such signatory requirement. Is this note an error?
Answer: Revised Unanimous Consent of Directors
Here is an email: Dear John, dear Vincent, Let me up-date you on the roundtables we decided in the last meeting to focus on during the rest of the academic year. The original idea was to keep the number of events from 3 to 4 roundtables each semester. The result of the last meeting with all members was driven by enthusiasm, and as you see below we produced a prolific list of 13 subjects. Maybe you can help us to narrow down to a reasonable number, 12 events (one we had yesterday) by May 2002 we think are too many. I also would take this opportunity to update on the ongoing relationships with the most prominent industry in the sectors and have your feedback, suggestion on how to group them in the roundtable. We got great support so far from Reliant, Enron, Mirant, Schell (Coral), Bp, Duke. El Paso, Chevron-Texaco, Phillips, and Halliburton etc.. also are interested and we will present the club to them as well. The major challenge for us is not transform the Energy Club in a Finance Energy Club. At Rice we already have a Finance club and it works very well. We want first educate about the energy industry in general, and second present the opportunities for MBAs in the industry in different areas, including finance but not limited to. Topics of Roundtable Meetings: 0) Energy "101" 1) Corporate Finance (Treasurer or Controller) 2) Energy Consulting 3) Financial Services (trading, risk management) 4) Origination, Marketing and Sales (Oil, Gas, Electricity) - Marteen 5) Project Development, strategic planning 6) Project Finance 7) Project Risk Management 8) Regulation, Deregulation, and Restructuring - Reliant done 9/17/2001 9) Structuring of Products 10) Supply Chain 11) Telecom - Broadband 12) Venture Capital within energy industry - Brian, Paresh Thanks in advance for your precious suggestions and I am looking forward to meeting you.
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: Rice Energy Club Roundtable topics
Q: We have reviewed the assignments Jean sent out earlier in the week. At this time I think the split is OK. I would like for you to put in writing for me the following: Who is your back up on critical reports, etc when you are out. I would like for that back up to be someone that was NOT on your original team. This may help us address the issue of the two "old" teams merging. For example I am assuming if one rep has the shipper business and another rep has the operator business for the same company, then those two reps should back each other's desk. Randy Janzen is backing up Jean Adams desk on Lamar Power Plant since he has AEP which is shipper that does business at the Lamar Plant. Scott and Kathy support each other's desk since Kathy has ElPaso as a Shipper and Scott has ElPaso as Operator. Harry and Joe support each other on Oneok since Harry has Bushton and Joe has the gathering The areas of concern in relation to day to day business are below and need specific back up reps. GPM Monthly Pricing Report Lamar Power Plant True Ups PVR Report Oneok Gathering Reporting NNG Administrative Contracts SPS Power Plant True Up Conoco Power Plant True Up MOPS Daily Report The HIgh profile shippers/Operators that need specific back ups are as follows: Duke/GPM Oneok Transcanada Dynegy Reliant ElPaso West Texas Gas If there is any confusion with the email, please do not hesitate to call Terry or myself. Thanks. Lynn
Propose a subject line
A: Team Shipper/Operator Assignments
Here is an email: Guys, I have explained the strategy/tactics that have lead to this position in some detail. In my opinion the company is not at risk and potentially ENA could create significant value from a project that we have very little invested. I understand the construction risk on the bid as much as anyone and we have no intention of lifting their offer. As far as EECC involvement, as I had mentioned, Coleman was a part of all these discussions. I will argue that Mike and the ENA deal team made the right call necessary to maximize return in the short run for Enron without investing significant dollars or taking significant risks. Obviously, I was unsuccessful in explaining such a sophisticated strategy. Regards
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A:
Las Vegas CoGen