Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.

Q: " Crooked as a dog's hind leg ". That pretty much sums it up, the gerrymandering, coupled with an all out assault on democratic principles perpetrated by the Parnell administration has left Alaska in this predicament. Our current conservative thugs have only their self interest at heart. That part of the republican philosophy remains constant. That the budget was ever allowed to grow to four billion is criminal in itself. The problem with restructuring the dividend is there are no checks and balances associated with government spending, we see what they've managed to accomplish thus far, give our children's future to the oil companies. Its time to take back our government and diversify our interest in economic development. Thanks for another fine commentary Shannyn.

A: Yes
****
Q: I've been gone, when do think we last had a beautiful city?

A thousand free weed whackers circulating in Eugene would go a long way in most neighborhoods. So much of what I see is simple decay of older structures.

And I would add a lot of individual decisions on property care that goes with very lax standards. Would asking a person to cut down weeds be a violation of their freedom of choice?

A: Yes
****
Q: Credits should defray, but never eliminate the tax liability to the State. They should reduce by a maximum of 50% any tax liability. That's a fair compromise which preserves the benefit to the oil companies but still protects the State from the very situation we have now. Oil production projects are long-term ventures which provide a suitably long period for the credits to be used during the production phase.

A:
No
****