You will be given a context and a verb separated with a newline character, and you have to answer if the given verb can be anchored in time or not. We say a verb can be anchored in the real timeline if and only if a verb happened in the past, is happening now, or is guaranteed to happen in the future. The output should be "Yes" if the verb can be anchored in time and "No" otherwise.

Example Input: He added that a ceremonial accession would still be held at the NATO Washington summit on April 24 and 25. The March accession will enable the three countries to be eligible for (signing) the summit documents that will include the alliance's new strategic concept and post-Madrid development plan, the official added.
Verb: signing
Example Output: No

Example Input: Once Gonzalez comes to the United States _ it would be preferable if he went to Miami rather than to Washington _ only the most obdurate foes of Castro can argue that Elian should not be reunited with him. Gonzalez's arrival should also help clear the way for the Justice Department to make arrangements to (transfer) custody of the child.
Verb: transfer
Example Output: No

Example Input: The newspaper of Cuba's Communist Party, daily Gramma, published a letter Thursday from Elian's grandmothers to Reno and Immigration and Naturalization Service Commissioner Doris Meissner asking for Elian's return. No material good exists that can compete with the value of the family, and it is humiliating for us that people are still (questioning) our love and the future that awaits Elian at his home, said a Spanish version of the letter, dated Feb. 4.
Verb: questioning
Example Output:
Yes