Kathy, My recollection is the costs to us were roughly: Scenario 1 $55m 2 week for service 2 weeks for $10k in pay Min 8 weeks max 52 Scenario 2 $45m 1.5 weeks 1.5 weeks Min 8 max 39 Scenario 3 $35m Dynegy 2 weeks Min 13 weeks max 52 I've pitched the following compromise to Dynegy this morning: 2 weeks for service 2 weeks for every $10k of salary capped at $100k Min 13 weeks max 52 weeks. Can you run numbers and correct above if I'm way off. Thanks
Answer: Severance
Here is an email: Scott, As discussed yesterday we really appreciate your help in moving the negotiations along for the Master with Williams Energy Marketing & Trading Company. Just to give you some facts: We do have a GISB with Williams, of which they are the Confirming Party. Williams has made a decision not to confirm any deals less than a month in term, this is breach of contract. We currently have over 800 deals pending execution as they are not sending paper.
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: Williams Physical Gas Master
Q: Guys, I received Harrell's memo concerning the fuel use for the turbine and the fact that you had to reduce gas producer speeds to comply with the permits fuel use requirements. My question is, how does the fuel use compare with what Solar says the fuel use should be? If we can get Solar to provide written guarantees and "UP" the fuel use value for the turbine, we can up the fuel value on the permit. The state of Colorado perceives increased fuel use beyond manufacturers values as the turbine not operating correctly and in need of mechanical adjustment. From their eyes, this would be a strong indication of excess emissions, and I think there evaluation would hold some merit. Anyway, I dont want to send up a red flag to the state of Colorado. Would you contact Solar and compare their fuel use values with what the monitors say the turbine is burning at La Plata? Then let me know. If worse gets to worse, I may be able to use another tactic, but only as a last resort.
Propose a subject line
A: Fuel Consumption, La Plata A
IN: Congratulations on the first bandwith trades! I understand we have done two trades today with the following bandwidth counterparties: 1. Broadwing Communication Services Inc. - we have a Master Bandwidth Purchase and Sale Agreement executed April 27, 2000, effective as of March 28, 2000. It has just arrived in the bandwidth Legal Dept. and Marie Heard, the paralegal for bandwidth, will be getting the copy down to Global Contracts. 2. The other party appears to be El Paso Energy Communications, and we have no master in place with this counterparty, so an online confirm with the GTC should be used here. If you have any other questions let me know, and I'll try and help you or get someone who can!

Generate a subject line.

OUT: Online Bandwidth Trades
IN: This is an email
We sold the National Fuel back to the Canadian desk for June at NX1 + $.235. The volume is 9189 per day, deal ticket 782980. Kimat, please forward to the Canadian Book Admin.

What is the subject?

OUT: National Fuel for June
Gerald, Here is a revised copy of the agreement. I added some strong safety language in Section 22 which I need you to look at. Also, I don't see a "Failure to Perform" provision - is this covered somewhere else? Also want to discuss the Remedy in case of Default provisions. I don't want BCCKOP to be able to shut the facility down and hold us hostage for payment of something. I want them to be able to terminate the agreement, and then orderly shutdown the facility and then leave. Otherwise, we keep on operating. Let's discuss. Also added words on Schedule F. Ken Krisa - BCCKOP BWGP Op Agreement 11-01 kck.doc
Answer:
BCCKOP Operating Agreement