Given a paragraph, generate a claim that is supported by the given paragraph. 1) The claim must contain information from within the paragraph. 2) A sentence within the paragraph can be used as a claim. 3) The claim should not have contradictions within the paragraph. 4) The claim should be at most one sentence long.
Example: "Although the story didn't cite the cost of appendectomy emergency or urgent surgery and we wish it had, we nonetheless will give it a satisfactory score because it at least cited what the editorial writer wrote, ""A secondary benefit is the savings to the hospital generated by minimizing staff and anesthesiologist presence late in the evening and during the wee hours of the morning."" As with our harms score above, although the story didn't give absolute numbers, in this case we think it was sufficient for it to report that ""The scientists found no significant difference among the groups in the patients' condition 30 days after surgery or in the length of their operation or hospital stay."" Although the story didn't give absolute numbers, in this case we think it was sufficient for it to report that ""The scientists found no significant difference among the groups in the patients' condition 30 days after surgery or in the length of their operation or hospital stay."" Despite running less than 300 words, this story did an adequate job in explaining the quality of the evidence, including pointing out limitations. No disease-mongering here. The story meets the bare minimum requirement for this criterion in that it at least cited what an editorial stated. The focus of the story was on a study comparing emergency appendectomy with surgery done up to 12 hours later or beyond. This is the whole focus of the story and one we applaud when it begins: ""Appendectomy is the most common emergency surgery in the world, but it doesn't have to be."" There were no claims made about the novelty of this research, and we may have wished for a bit more context on this. Nonetheless, the potential for guiding future care decisions was made clear. Not applicable. Given that the story only pulled excerpts from the journal article and the accompanying editorial, and didn't include any fresh quotes from interviews, we can't be sure of the extent to which it may have been influenced by a news release."
Example solution: Some appendicitis cases may not require 'emergency' surgery
Example explanation: The paragraph mentions that "Appendectomy is the most common emergency surgery in the world, but it doesn't have to be." which is considered evidence for the output. Thus, the output is a valid claim.

Problem: "The story fails to mention the price of the anti-psychotic medications. While this information is not crucial here, as a matter of course the cost of drug regimens under study should be mentioned. In this case, some of the anti-psychotic medications are expensive when taken long-term. The story made a modest attempt to explain the possible benefits of the anti-psychotic drugs for Alzheimer's patients effectively painting a picture of doubt about their value. It states that the drugs may help control aggression and hallucinations ""for a few months."" And the story included the damning comment from the Alzheimer's Association spokesman: ""At some point, some people will be better off with no medication."" The story does a commendable job of describing the harms of the drugs in a variety of ways: It also mentions other side effects linked to the drugs, including respiratory problems and stroke. The news report does an excellent job of describing how the study was conducted and what outcomes it measured. It would have been valuable to mention that, as a randomized controlled trial, this is a well-designed, high-quality study. The story does not sensationalize the condition or its treatment. The reporter interviewed three people: the study's lead author, the head of an advocacy group with no connection to the study, and an independent psychiatrist. The report properly discloses that the study's author has received grants from companies that make Alzheimer's drugs. The article uses two quotes suggesting that taking no medication is an option. It also usefully quotes a source who says environmental and behavioral treatments can be used to control some symptoms of dementia. The first sentence states the drugs are ""commonly used."" Later on, the story says that up to 60 percent of patients with dementia in the US and UK are given the drugs for one to two years. [This latter detail, unfortunately, is unsourced.] Since the treatment is common, novelty is not an issue. The story does not appear to draw from the medical journal's press release."
Solution: Alzheimer's drugs double death risk in elderly