Detailed Instructions: Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
Q: The explanation given by LTD for viewing photos on the phone does not hold water. It is highly unlikely that the LTD personnel will recognize a random citizen of the metropolitan area. Had they looked at the phone book entries, their justification for viewing the phone's data might at least be reasonable. Viewing the photo section was simply an invasion of privacy. There was no justifiable reason to access the photos. I suspect that many will object and discharge any privacy issues with the justification that a perv was found. Next time the LTD employee may view and use bank documents and passwords or pins or access private unpublished phone numbers. But so what, we got a perv.
A:
No