Sentence 1: and are among the three largest recipients of U.S. outbound mail, the third being . U.S. outbound mail to and exceeds the inbound mail from each of those countries by about a -to-one ratio.

Sentence 2: The mail system had more going out than coming in.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: yes

Question:
Then he turned and parried hard.

Does it follow that "He fought the man off."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
yes

Q: If In order to be comprehensive and cohesive, the researchers provide a great deal of detail and description and quote directly from the participants' own words and vignettes in the observers' field records., can we say that "The researchers provided little details and barely any descriptions, it was difficult to read."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A: no

Premise:
"As long as you satisfy two simple criteria, I'm willing to call you rational."
Hypothesis: I will only be willing to call you rational if you can satisfy these five criteria.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

no

input question: um-hum yeah those those are good points um which obviously i'd never thought about um i don't know what uh i suppose they also not being a state are probably freer to determine their own um ways of life than they would if if i i'm trying to think exactly what is imposed if they would become a state versus a territory If this premise is true, does that tell us:"I hadn't considered those points before, though my mind is already made up regarding some of them."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: it is not possible to tell

Q: If So we sit." He spat on the ground., can we say that "The man spat on the ground."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A:
yes