In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

Comment: Might as well breakout the ass trays and allow smoking inside. Lol. I eat peanuts or some type of treenut everyday in the comforts of my own home. I've always considered others in public settings and made sure I didn't bring traces to these areas. McD's has lost my respect and business on this decision. Not sure why I support those who are affected by allergies but I'm glad I'm not ignorant to their struggles.
Non-identity-attack

Comment: This Hitler argument is stale...arming people with military style weapons not only supports the crazy, it reflects our inability to understand why the vast majority of police favor the reasonable regulation of firearms ownership. They would also like to see regulation ammunition that's relates to the ability to kill them regulated. None of this minimal regulation would limit your freedoms...Canada has resonance gun regulations, Australia bans a number of styles of weaponry...they they both seem okay. The difference? Fewer gun deaths, fewer crazies with arms, and a clearer commitment to community safety. It's your children, our police, the neighbor down the street that desires reasonable consideration.
Non-identity-attack

Comment: Yeah, all those black and brown "liberals" who are incensed at his comments about Mexicans being rapists, criminals, etc. and mass deportatation, building a wall and so on as well as refusing to rent to blacks etc. are wrong. But good ole white Dave63 knows better than they do.
Identity-attack