[QUESTION] Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "A woman wearing all black except for brown boots is standing next to a tagged wall."
Hypothesis: "Woman reading graffatii."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
Someone could stand next to a tagged wall without reading graffatti (sic).
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

Q: Premise: "Lady in tan slacks walking past a painted wall."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A lady in slacks walking past the wall she painted." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A: The fact that lady in tan slacks walking past a painted wall does not imply that she is walking past the wall she painted.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

QUESTION: Premise: "A basketball player wearing a green and yellow trimmed white uniform."
Hypothesis: "Has just made a basket during a game."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?

Let's solve it slowly: The basket ball player is wearing a red and orange uniform.
The answer is no.

[QUESTION] Given the sentence "Two scuba divers are underwater." is it true that "Man dives in the water to catch the fish."?
Just because the scuba divers are underwater does not mean they are trying to catch he fish. The may be looking for buried treasure.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

Q: Premise: "Two men fighting in front of an audience."
Hypothesis: "Two men playing soccer."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
A: They can't fight in front of an audience and play soccer at the same time.
The answer is no.

[QUESTION] Premise: "A man in a polo shirt sits in a chair looking at a computer screen."
Hypothesis: "A man is looking at porn on his computer."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Porn isn't the only thing that can be looked at on a computer screen.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.