This is the content of an email: Attached is a summary report of the EWS tactical (revenue driven) and strategic (educational) visits to Enron supported by experience ENRON in third quarter 2001. At experience ENRON, our goal is to support the EWS deal development teams by creating powerful Enron experiences that result in greater favorability and familiarity of Enron while differentiating us from the competition. Our role is to: Reduce time and labor costs associated with planning and execution of customer visits Coordinate BU subject matter experts (SME's) to tell the Enron story, i.e. EOL, trading, etc. Customize agendas aligned with Enron and customer objectives Shorten sales cycles We are here to support your team in reaching your goals. Please call with questions or changes.

Subject: EWS Q3 2001 experience ENRON Report

This is the content of an email: This email message revises our previous message in two ways: (1) it corrects the spelling of Dr. Cicchetti's name and (2) it provides a call-in number for the conference room in which the deposition will be held. We apologize for the misspelling of Dr. Cicchetti's name; unfortunately, we copied the misspelling from the transmittal letter that accompanied Dr. Cicchetti's testimony. The deposition of Dr. Charles J. Cicchetti will be taken at the offices of Steptoe & Johnson LLP on Wednesday, November 28, 2001, beginning at 9:30 a.m. Details Proceeding: San Diego Gas & Electric Co. v. Sellers of Energy and Ancillary Services, Docket Nos. EL00-95-045 et al. Deponent: Dr. Charles J. Cicchetti

Subject: Deposition of Dr. Cicchetti -- Corrected Details

This is the content of an email: Brant, Attached is clean and redlined copy of the revised Credit Services Agreement with Bridgeline. I made significant revisions to this document. In general the document was very thin and needed to be reinforced to provide a more detailed deal arrangement. Please review and if credit is OK, I am fine to send this to Bridgeline. Please note that I did leave an open question on the fee structure. The agreement currently provides for a flat fee of $10,000 per month for the services. Do we need to be reimburse for any third party expenses to perform the services or would all services be internal and included in the flat fee? Need to establish this before we send out to Bridgeline. Let me know if you have any questions.

Subject: Credit Services Agreement

This is the content of an email: Attached for your review are Transwestern's comments to be filed tomorrow on the CPUC's Proposed Decision in the SoCal GIR proceeding. Please review and comment to either Greg Porter or myself by the end of today. Thanks gh
Subject: Comments on SoCal GIR Proposed Decision