Question: Paula Broadwell, a woman who was romantically involved with former CIA Director David Petraeus, will not face federal charges of cyberstalking another woman friendly with Petraeus.

The U.S. Attorney's Office in Tampa informed Broadwell's attorney Robert Muse of the decision in a brief letter dated December 14.

"As the target of our investigation, we believe that it is appropriate to advise your client that our office has determined that no federal charges will be brought" regarding allegations of cyberstalking, Assistant U.S. Attorney W. Stephen Muldrow wrote.

Muse told CNN he was "very pleased that the U.S. Attorney's office in Tampa very promptly resolved this matter."

A source close to Broadwell said the letter had been received Monday.

"She's pleased with the prosecutor's decision and glad it's been resolved," the source told CNN.

Read more: After Petraeus scandal, Broadwell grapples with 'normal life'

Petraeus resigned November 9 after revealing that he'd been involved in an extramarital affair.

U.S. officials said the FBI discovered Petraeus was involved with Broadwell, a woman who was under investigation for sending allegedly harassing and anonymous e-mails to Jill Kelley, a Tampa socialite who was friendly with Petraeus and his wife.

Sources close to Kelley said she had not been romantically involved with Petraeus.

During the investigation the FBI obtained Broadwell's computer and discovered she had classified materials. Investigators also searched Broadwell's home in North Carolina. Sources said the materials were technically classified but not highly sensitive. Still the FBI and Justice Department prosecutors have not resolved whether Broadwell will face charges for having such materials in her personal possession. 1. what did the fbi seearch for
2. who was pleased with the u.s. attorney office
3. the FBI is unsure who will be charged for having sensitive materials
4. when did Petraeus resign
5. did he have an affair?
6. who did he have one with?
7. will she face charges for cyber stalking
8. who did she send cyber stalking emails to?
9. where does boardwells live?
10. who wrote there will be no federal charges
11. is Pateaeus married?
12. where did the FBi obtain classified info Provide a numbered list of answers.
****
A numbered of answers: 1. classified materials
2. Muse
3. Broadwell
4. November 9
5. yes
6. Broadwell
7. they haven't resolved that yet
8. Jill Kelley
9. North Carolina
10. W. Stephen Muldrow
11. yes
12. Broadwell's computer

Q: CHAPTER IX

The latter part of September Carley returned to New York.

Soon after her arrival she received by letter a formal proposal of marriage from Elbert Harrington, who had been quietly attentive to her during her sojourn at Lake Placid. He was a lawyer of distinction, somewhat older than most of her friends, and a man of means and fine family. Carley was quite surprised. Harrington was really one of the few of her acquaintances whom she regarded as somewhat behind the times, and liked him the better for that. But she could not marry him, and replied to his letter in as kindly a manner as possible. Then he called personally.

"Carley, I've come to ask you to reconsider," he said, with a smile in his gray eyes. He was not a tall or handsome man, but he had what women called a nice strong face.

"Elbert, you embarrass me," she replied, trying to laugh it out. "Indeed I feel honored, and I thank you. But I can't marry you."

"Why not?" he asked, quietly.

"Because I don't love you," she replied.

"I did not expect you to," he said. "I hoped in time you might come to care. I've known you a good many years, Carley. Forgive me if I tell you I see you are breaking--wearing yourself down. Maybe it is not a husband you need so much now, but you do need a home and children. You are wasting your life."

"All you say may be true, my friend," replied Carley, with a helpless little upflinging of hands. "Yet it does not alter my feelings."

1. Carley
2. Elbert Harrington
3. Soon after her arrival
4. New York
5. September
6. no
7. The latter
8. a formal proposal
9. of marriage
10. a lawyer
11. no
12. somewhat older than most of her friends
13. yes
14. yes
15. as somewhat behind the times
16. no
17. by replying to his letter
18. no
19. asked her to reconsider
20. it embarrassed her

Numbered questions:
1. who received a letter?
2. from who?
3. when?
4. to where?
5. during what month?
6. was the it beginning of the month?
7. what part?
8. what was in the letter?
9. what kind?
10. what does he do for a living?
11. was he young?
12. how is his age compared?
13. is he wealthy?
14. does he come from a good family?
15. what did Carley think about him?
16. Did she want to marry him?
17. how did she let him know?
18. did he leave it at that?
19. what did he do?
20. how did that make her feel?

input: A Tale of Two Cities was written by the famous English writer Charles Dickens. The tale is mainly about the French Revolution in 1789, where the poor rose up against the king and the nobles. Dickens showed deep sympathy for the poor and deep hatred for the cruelty of the upper class, though he wrote quite a lot about the love triangle between Lucie, Charles and Sydney.

In this novel, Dickens wrote some lively characters like Sydney and those crazy revolutionaries. In this tale, we can't see any absolute roles. Charles, though he's a brave and good man, obviously he hasn't as much ability as Sydney. Sydney, a typical tragic man, a man like him, usually has great ability. But he has some weak points on characters and the worst is that he always loves a woman he shouldn't love and 99.99% die for her at last in an extremely heroic or tragic way. The revolutionaries are not as full of justice as usual. They get mad when they can get revenge for their unfair treatment. The fire of hatred burns everything. When they're at the bottom of the society, they're calling for justice, for fair treatment, for freedom, but when they're in charge of the society, their world is up-side-down. They hate everything that is connected to the very people against them, even including Charles' wife, Dr. Manette's daughter. So _ have no difference from those former governors at heart.

Though Dickens told us how the authority is recycling over and over again in some way, the novel is about something good. Love from Sydney to Lucie is one of the only few bright points in the novel and it's really great. A man can sacrifice his life to save his lover's husband. He doesn't have any personal purpose and just for his lover's happiness. So Dickens may imply us, only love can solve the problems between people, between the poor and the rich, love is everything. 1. who are some of the main characters in the book?
2. in what book?
3. I dickens from Australia?
4. what does he think of the poor?
5. during what historic time period?
6. are the revolutionaries full of justice?
7. what happens when they are in charge?
8. is Charles a brave man?
9. what is one of the bright points in the novel?
10. how do the revolutionaries feel about Charle's wife?
11. what does DIckens think of the upper class? Return numbered answers in your output.

output:
1. Sydney and Lucie
2. A Tale of Two Cities
3. no
4. he writes about the poor rising up
5. the French Revolution in 1789
6. no
7. their world is up-side-down
8. yes
9. Love from Sydney to Lucie
10. they hate her
11. he showed deep hatred for the cruelty of the upper class