TASK DEFINITION: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control) into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.
PROBLEM: Sent1: I think the 2nd Amendment does apply to modern guns.
Sent2: As a gun-owner and/or strong 2nd Amendment advocate, its importance cannot be overstated, and I do believe it has the potential to render a slew of local, state and federal laws null and void.

SOLUTION: Not similar

PROBLEM: Sent1: Federal law doesn't give them authority to require sale reports of multiple shotgun and rifle sales, only handguns.
Sent2: I feel like existing laws need to actually be enforced and new ones targeted at those they are created for and not at legal law abiding gun owners.

SOLUTION: Not similar

PROBLEM: Sent1: So, no, I wouldn't say there was any "gun control" as you (Galileo) tried to pass off as early gun control laws.
Sent2: So I think gun control on the magnitude you want would effect it, how could it not?

SOLUTION:
Not similar