In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: LOL! You Trumpistas are something else. Wasn't it that long ago you were saying how great the economy has been doing since your hero got elected? And now you're saying the economy is doing poorly in order to justify the nonsense exhibited by this administration? Hilarious!

Also, these 'dreamers' are people who've been looking for a better life and now that's being taken away without any remedy to address their status beyond deportation at this point. The U.S is a nation not unlike Canada whose very foundation has been immigration so to suggest that 'actual citizens,' who were immigrants too at one point, should be allowed to dream as well is a rational for this reeks of hypocrisy.

Output: Non-identity-attack

Input: Consider Input: Comment: Quote: "Michelle Obama is taking some heat for recent remarks she made on gender, but I'm struggling to muster outrage given the sheer incoherence of what she actually said."

True, I've rarely found what Michelle says coherent, but I suspect that what she's saying is primarily directed at black communities. She could have gone much further and bluntly stated that blacks coddle far too much the criminality and paternal irresponsibility in black males. (I won't call them men.) That's glaringly obvious and different from mostly white schools where ordinary boyishness is attacked as "toxic masculinity."

Output: Identity-attack

Input: Consider Input: Comment: If he called her a "big, black woman," that's going to weigh heavily against him.
Output: Identity-attack