Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.

[EX Q]: What legal precedent requires a duly tried and convicted defendant to pay for "upgrades" as part of their restitution? I knew this would turn into a blank check boondoggle. Government always decides to give itself endless free money.
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: What an arrogant horse's behind Kat Pratt talking about people who disagree with her - "I get it about once a day usually and some of them get more confrontational. Maybe some not maybe as not educated as that last gentleman, and there's a lot to learn,". She is an example of why the French used the guillotine for elites.
[EX A]: Yes

[EX Q]: Well you are talking about Kim Metcalf of Party Faithful R-US
[EX A]:
No