input question: On a scale of 1-5 (with 1 being least favorable and 5 being most favorable), how would you rate this review? "GOOD"???
output answer: 5

On a scale of 1-5 (with 1 being least favorable and 5 being most favorable), how would you rate this review? "Varshini"
----
Answer: 5

Q: On a scale of 1-5 (with 1 being least favorable and 5 being most favorable), how would you rate this review? "Awesome Thank you"
A: 5

Question: On a scale of 1-5 (with 1 being least favorable and 5 being most favorable), how would you rate this review? "I think it's the best so far"
Answer: 5

[Q]: On a scale of 1-5 (with 1 being least favorable and 5 being most favorable), how would you rate this review? "Works great against a prosody XMPP server. Carbon Copy: works (meesages go to Psi+ and Conversations) Mentions: work (notifications when my nick is mentioned in a conference quiet otherwise) Notifications on keywords in a conference: not implemented (oh well). Overall it's not as feature-rich as Xabber but so far it's less buggy and the UI is much better."
****
[A]: 5

Problem: Given the question: On a scale of 1-5 (with 1 being least favorable and 5 being most favorable), how would you rate this review? "Google play Very good"
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
The answer is:
5