Here is a premise:
Perhaps the crime isn't that cards are prepackaged but that they are false--the impersonal disguised as the personal, a mere pretense of affection, like corporate gift-giving, particularly when the company passes out prostitutes who, I'm told by corporate insiders, only pretend to like you.

Here is a hypothesis:
It's more of a crime that the cards are false.

Is it possible to conclude that if the premise is true, then so is the hypothesis?
yes