input question: It is one thing to know that a man is guilty, it is quite another matter to prove him so. If this premise is true, does that tell us:"There is a difference between knowing a man is guilty and proving him guilty."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: yes

Question:
Based on the premise "The principal differences will be the size of the sorbent storage silo, the size of the metering and conveying system, and the size and number of injectors for the sorbent injection system.", can we conclude that "There will be no changes to the size of the sorbent storage silo."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
no

Question: Sentence A: a 1302(b), requires the Secretary to prepare regulatory impact analyses for any rule that may have a significant impact on the operations of a substantial number of small rural hospitals.

Sentence B: It doesn't matter what happens to small rural hospitals.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question: 'Doesn't seem to be.'
Does not appear to be.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Problem: Here is a premise:
Heroism in battle and the noble values of the samurai tradition are the principal themes.

Here is a hypothesis:
The core theme of the drama is cowardice.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question:
The whole area around Grasmere and Rydal Water is full of gentle walks in beautiful deciduous woodland.

Does it follow that "The area around Grasmere and Rydal Water is extremely metropolitan."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
no