You will be given a definition of a task first, then an example. Follow the example to solve a new instance of the task.
In this task, you are given text for US Congressional and California state bills, your task is to generate a summary for this bill.

SECTION 1. LIABILITY OF BUSINESS ENTITIES PROVIDING USE OF FACILITIES
TO NONPROFIT ORGANIZATIONS.

(a) Definitions.--In this section:
(1) Business entity.--The term ''business entity'' means a
firm, corporation, association, partnership, consortium, joint
venture, or other form of enterprise.
(2) Facility.--The term ''facility'' means any real
property, including any building, improvement, or appurtenance.
(3) Gross negligence.--The term ''gross negligence'' means
voluntary and conscious conduct by a person with knowledge (at
the time of the conduct) that the conduct is likely to be
harmful to the health or well-being of another person.
(4) Intentional misconduct.--The term ''intentional
misconduct'' means conduct by a person with knowledge (at the
time of the conduct) that the conduct is harmful to the health
or well-being of another person.
(5) Nonprofit organization.--The term ''nonprofit
organization'' means--
(A) any organization described in section 501(c)(3)
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and exempt from
tax under section 501(a) of such Code; or
(B) any not-for-profit organization organized and
conducted for public benefit and operated primarily for
charitable, civic, educational, religious, welfare, or
health purposes.
(6) State.--The term ''State'' means each of the several
States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto
Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, the Northern
Mariana Islands, any other territory or possession of the
United States, or any political subdivision of any such State,
territory, or possession.
(b) Limitation on Liability.--
(1) In general.--Subject to subsection (c), a business
entity shall not be subject to civil liability relating to any
injury or death occurring at a facility of the business entity
in connection with a use of such facility by a nonprofit
organization if--
(A) the use occurs outside of the scope of business
of the business entity;
(B) such injury or death occurs during a period
that such facility is used by the nonprofit
organization; and
(C) the business entity authorized the use of such
facility by the nonprofit organization.
(2) Application.--This subsection shall apply--
(A) with respect to civil liability under Federal
and State law; and
(B) regardless of whether a nonprofit organization
pays for the use of a facility.
(c) Exception for Liability.--Subsection (b) shall not apply to an
injury or death that results from an act or omission of a business
entity that constitutes gross negligence or intentional misconduct,
including any misconduct that--
(1) constitutes a crime of violence (as that term is
defined in section 16 of title 18, United States Code) or act
of international terrorism (as that term is defined in section
2331 of title 18) for which the defendant has been convicted in
any court;
(2) constitutes a hate crime (as that term is used in the
Hate Crime Statistics Act (28 U.S.C. 534 note));
(3) involves a sexual offense, as defined by applicable
State law, for which the defendant has been convicted in any
court; or
(4) involves misconduct for which the defendant has been
found to have violated a Federal or State civil rights law.
(d) Superseding Provision.--
(1) In general.--Subject to paragraph (2) and subsection
(e), this Act preempts the laws of any State to the extent that
such laws are inconsistent with this Act, except that this Act
shall not preempt any State law that provides additional
protection from liability for a business entity for an injury
or death with respect to which conditions under subparagraphs
(A) through (C) of subsection (b)(1) apply.
(2) Limitation.--Nothing in this Act shall be construed to
supersede any Federal or State health or safety law.
(e) Election of State Regarding Nonapplicability.--This Act shall
not apply to any civil action in a State court against a business
entity in which all parties are citizens of the State if such State
enacts a statute--
(1) citing the authority of this subsection;
(2) declaring the election of such State that this Act
shall not apply to such civil action in the State; and
(3) containing no other provision.
Solution: Shields a business entity from civil liability relating to any injury or death occurring at a facility of that entity in connection with a use of such facility by a nonprofit organization if: (1) the use occurs outside the scope of business of the business entity; (2) such injury or death occurs during a period that such facility is used by such organization; and (3) the business entity authorized the use of such facility by the organization.
Makes this Act inapplicable to an injury or death that results from an act or omission of a business entity that constitutes gross negligence or intentional misconduct, including misconduct that: (1) constitutes a hate crime or a crime of violence or act of international terrorism for which the defendant has been convicted in any court; or (2) involves a sexual offense for which the defendant has been convicted in any court or misconduct for which the defendant has been found to have violated a Federal or State civil rights law.
Preempts State laws to the extent that such laws are inconsistent with this Act, except State law that provides additional protection from liability. Specifies that this Act shall not be construed to supersede any Federal or State health or safety law.
Makes this Act inapplicable to any civil action in a State court against a business entity in which all parties are citizens of the State if such State, citing this Act's authority and containing no other provision, enacts a statute declaring the State's election that this Act shall not apply to such action in the State.
Why? This Bill focuses on shielding business entities from civil liability relating to an injury or death depending on the conditions of injury, hence the generated summary is correct.

New input: SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ''Pine River Indian Irrigation Project
Act of 2009''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS; PURPOSE.

(a) Findings.--Congress finds that--
(1) drought, population increases, and environmental needs
are exacerbating water supply issues across the western United
States, including on the Southern Ute Indian Reservation in
southwestern Colorado;
(2)(A) a report of the Government Accountability Office
dated 2006 identified significant issues with the Pine River
Indian Irrigation Project, including the issue that, at the
time of the study, the Bureau of Indian Affairs estimated that
total deferred maintenance costs for the Project exceeded
$20,000,000; and
(B) other estimates have placed those costs at more than
$60,000,000;
(3) the report of the Government Accountability Office
demonstrates that key facilities of the Project are severely
deteriorated;
(4) operations and maintenance fees are not sufficient to
address the condition of the Project, even though the Bureau of
Indian Affairs has sought to double those fees, from $8.50 to
$17, in recent years;
(5) the report of the Government Accountability Office also
notes that a prior study done by the Bureau of Reclamation
determined that water users could not afford to pay operations
and maintenance fees of $8.50 and operate a profitable farming
operation;
(6) the benefits of rehabilitating and repairing the
irrigation infrastructure of the Project include--
(A) water conservation;
(B) extending available water supply;
(C) increased agricultural production;
(D) economic benefits;
(E) safer facilities; and
(F) the preservation of the culture of the Southern
Ute Indian Tribe;
(7) while, as of the date of enactment of this Act, the
Project is managed by the Bureau of Indian Affairs, the
Southern Ute Indian Tribe also receives water from facilities
owned or operated by the Bureau of Reclamation; and
(8) rehabilitation and repair of the infrastructure of the
Project by the Bureau of Reclamation would improve--
(A) overall water management; and
(B) the ability of the Southern Ute Indian Tribe
and the Bureau of Reclamation to address potential
water conflicts.
(b) Purpose.--The purpose of this Act is to require the Secretary
of the Interior--
(1) to assess the condition of infrastructure of the Pine
River Indian Irrigation Project;
(2) to establish priorities for the rehabilitation of
irrigation infrastructure within the Project according to
specified criteria; and
(3) to implement rehabilitation activities for the
irrigation infrastructure of the Project.

SEC. 3. DEFINITIONS.

In this Act:
(1) Project.--The term ''Project'' means the Pine River
Indian Irrigation Project.
(2) Secretary.--The term ''Secretary'' means the Secretary
of the Interior.
(3) State.--The term ''State'' means the State of Colorado.
(4) Tribal council.--The term ''Tribal Council'' means the
Southern Ute Indian Tribal Council.
(5) Tribe.--The term ''Tribe'' means the Southern Ute
Indian Tribe.

SEC. 4. STUDY OF IRRIGATION INFRASTRUCTURE OF PROJECT.

(a) Study.--
(1) In general.--As soon as practicable after the date of
enactment of this Act, the Secretary, in consultation with the
Tribe, shall--
(A) conduct a study of the irrigation
infrastructure of the Project; and
(B) based on the results of the study, develop a
list of activities (including a cost estimate for each
activity) that are recommended to be implemented during
the 10-year period beginning on the date of completion
of the study to repair, rehabilitate, or reconstruct
that irrigation infrastructure.
(2) Factors for consideration.--
(A) In general.--In developing the list under
paragraph (1)(B), the Secretary shall give priority to
activities based on--
(i) a review of the priority factors
described in subparagraph (B) with respect to
the activity;
(ii) recommendations of the Tribe, if any;
and
(iii) a consideration of the projected
benefits of each activity on completion of the
Project.
(B) Priority factors.--The priority factors
referred to in subparagraph (A)(i) are--
(i) any threat to the health and safety
of--
(I) a member of the Tribe;
(II) an employee of the irrigation
operations and maintenance program of
the Bureau of Indian Affairs; or
(III) the general public;
(ii) the extent of disrepair of the
irrigation infrastructure of the Project and
the effect of the disrepair on the ability of
users of the Project to irrigate agricultural
land using that irrigation infrastructure;
(iii) whether, and the extent to which, the
repair, rehabilitation, or reconstruction of
the irrigation infrastructure of the Project
would provide an opportunity to conserve water;
(iv)(I) the economic and cultural impacts
the irrigation infrastructure of the Project
that is in disrepair has on the Tribe; and
(II) the economic and cultural benefits
that the repair, rehabilitation, or
reconstruction of that irrigation
infrastructure would have on the Tribe;
(v) the opportunity to address water supply
or environmental conflicts if the irrigation
infrastructure of the Project is repaired,
rehabilitated, or reconstructed; and
(vi) the overall benefits of the activity
to efficient water operations on the land of
the Tribe.
(3) Consultation.--In carrying out the study under this
subsection, the Secretary shall consult with the Assistant
Secretary for Indian Affairs and other relevant Federal and
local officials to evaluate the extent to which programs under
the jurisdiction of each Federal and local agency may be used
to develop--
(A) the list of activities under paragraph (1)(B);
or
(B) the report under subsection (b).
(b) Report.--
(1) In general.--Not later than 18 months after the date of
enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the
Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of the Senate, the
Committee on Natural Resources of the House of Representatives,
and the Tribe a report that includes--
(A) the list of activities recommended for
implementation under subsection (a)(1)(B); and
(B) any findings of the Secretary with respect to--
(i) the study under subsection (a);
(ii) consideration of the factors described
in subsection (a)(2); and
(iii) any consultation required under
subsection (a)(3).
(2) Biennial review.--Not later than 2 years after the date
on which the Secretary submits the report under paragraph (1)
and every 2 years thereafter, the Secretary, in consultation
with the Tribe, shall--
(A) review the report; and
(B) update the list of activities under subsection
(a)(1)(B) in accordance with each factor described in
subsection (a)(2), as the Secretary determines to be
appropriate.

SEC. 5. IRRIGATION INFRASTRUCTURE GRANTS AND AGREEMENTS.

(a) In General.--Subject to subsection (b), the Secretary may
provide grants to, and enter into cooperative agreements with, the
Tribe to plan, design, construct, or otherwise implement any activity
to repair, rehabilitate, reconstruct, or replace irrigation
infrastructure of the Project, if the activity is recommended for
implementation on the list under section 4(a)(1)(B).
(b) Limitation.--Assistance provided under subsection (a) shall not
be used for any on-farm improvement.
(c) Consultation and Coordination.--In providing assistance under
subsection (a), the Secretary shall--
(1) consult with, and obtain the approval of, the Tribe;
(2) consult with the Assistant Secretary for Indian
Affairs; and
(3) as appropriate, coordinate the activity with any work
being conducted under the irrigation operations and maintenance
program of the Bureau of Indian Affairs.
(d) Cost Sharing Requirement.--
(1) In general.--Except as provided in paragraph (2), the
Federal share of the total cost of carrying out an activity
using assistance under subsection (a) shall be not more than 75
percent.
(2) Exception.--The Secretary may waive or limit the non-
Federal share required under paragraph (1) on request of the
Tribe.

SEC. 6. EFFECT OF ACT.

(a) Water Rights of Tribe.--Nothing in this Act (including the
implementation of any activity carried out in accordance with this Act)
affects any right of the Tribe to receive, divert, store, or claim a
right to water, including the priority of right and the quantity of
water associated with the water right under Federal or State law.
(b) State Water Law.--Nothing in this Act preempts or affects--
(1) any provision of water law of the State; or
(2) any interstate compact governing water.

SEC. 7. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

(a) Study.--There is authorized to be appropriated to carry out the
study under section 4 $4,000,000.
(b) Irrigation Infrastructure Grants and Agreements.--There is
authorized to be appropriated to carry out section 5 $10,000,000 for
each of fiscal years 2010 through 2015.
Solution:
Pine River Indian Irrigation Project Act of 2009 - Directs the Secretary of the Interior to study the irrigation infrastructure of the Pine River Indian Irrigation Project, Colorado, and develop a list of activities that are recommended to be implemented over a 10-year period to repair, rehabilitate, or reconstruct that infrastructure.

Requires the Secretary to prioritize activities based on: (1) a review of specified priority factors (i.e., threats to health and safety; the extent of disrepair and its effect on the ability of Project users to irrigate agricultural land; the extent to which infrastructure repair would provide an opportunity to conserve water; the economic and cultural impacts the disrepair has, and benefits the repair would have, on the Tribe; the opportunity to address water supply or environmental conflicts through repair; and overall benefits of the activity to efficient water operations on the land of the Tribe); (2) recommendations of the Tribe; and (3) a consideration of projected benefits on Project completion.

Authorizes the Secretary to provide grants to, and enter into cooperative agreements with, the Tribe to repair, rehabilitate, reconstruct, or replace the Project's irrigation infrastructure. Prohibits such assistance from being used for on-farm improvements. Requires the Secretary, in providing assistance, to coordinate the activity with any work being conducted under the irrigation operations and maintenance program of the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA).

Caps the federal share of the total cost at 75%, subject to a waiver or limitation on the nonfederal share, at the Tribe's request.