In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Ex Input:
Comment: Prorogue
Harper proroguing Parliament was to stop an UNDEMOCRATIC attempt by the sore losers to form a Coalition to steal the election from the winning Conservatives
.
it was pathetic watching such "democrats" as Chretien and Ed Broadbent trotting up Parliament Hill with that intention
.
Proroguing by Harper is a tool in the Rule Book, so it is not undemocratic at all

Ex Output:
Non-obscene

Ex Input:
Comment: You must be "trolling" since no mentally stable individual would be so crass - or immature. On second thought, you are a natural for film..if, "Mean Girls" is up for a re-make head for Hollywood - you would be a natural for the lead.

Ex Output:
Non-obscene

Ex Input:
Comment: I don't even try and contain my contempt for the BC 'Liberals' and I am not concerned with who wins the may 9th election so long as it is not this corrupt, thoughtless, and elitist bunch. Any party, or any combination of parties, would have more interest in the economy and the people and the environment of BC.

Ex Output:
Non-obscene