input: The British Academy of Film and Television Arts (BAFTA) is an independent charity that supports, develops and promotes the art forms of the moving image film, television and game in the United Kingdom. In addition to its annual awards ceremonies, BAFTA has an international, year-round programme of learning events and initiatives offering access to talent through workshops, masterclasses, scholarships, lectures and mentoring schemes in the UK and the USA.

BAFTA started out as the British Film Academy, was founded in 1947 by a group of directors David Lean, Alexander Korda, Roger Manvell, Laurence Olivier, Emeric Pressburger, Michael Powell, Michael Balcon, Carol Reed, and other major figures of the British film industry.

David Lean was the founding chairman of the academy. The first Film Awards ceremony took place in May 1949 and honouring the films "The Best Years of Our Lives", "Odd Man Out" and "The World Is Rich".

The Guild of Television Producers and Directors was set up in 1953 with the first awards ceremony in October 1954, and in 1958 merged with the British Film Academy to form the Society of Film and Television Arts, whose inaugural meeting was held at Buckingham Palace and presided over by HRH The Duke of Edinburgh. 1. What is the main subject?
2. What's its acronym?
3. How did it start as?
4. What type of charity is it?
5. When was it founded?
6. By one person?
7. At least how many were involved?
8. What was there profession?
9. In what industry?
10. From what country?
11. Was there a founding chairperson?
12. Who was he?
13. When did the Guild begin?
14. And its first trophy event?
15. What happened on May 1949? Return numbered answers in your output.

output: 1. British Academy of Film and Television Arts
2. BAFTA)
3. The British Film Academy.
4. It develops and promotes the art forms of the moving image.
5. 1947
6. No.
7. 10
8. directors
9. film
10. Britain
11. Yes.
12. David Lean
13. 1953
14. 1954
15. The first Film Awards ceremony.

input: Chapter 14: The Battle Of Clissow.

Charlie sent in his name, and was shown in at once.

"I glad, indeed, to see you, Captain Carstairs," the minister said, as he entered. "We had given you up for lost. We heard first that you had been murdered in the streets of Warsaw. A month later, a man brought a letter to me from your Scotch friend Ramsay, to say that you were accused of the murder of a Jew trader, a man, it seems, of some importance in Warsaw. Ramsay said that you were in the company of a band of brigands, and that the man who went with you as your servant had joined you, and had taken you some money. He forwarded the letter you had sent him explaining your position, and said he thought that, upon the whole, it was the best thing you could have done, as a vigorous search had been set on foot, at the instance of the Jews, and there would have been but little chance of your making your way through the country alone. He added that he felt confident that, if alive, you would manage somehow to rejoin us before the campaign opened in the spring.

"I am glad that you have been able to do so, but your appearance, at present, is rather that of a wealthy Polish noble, than of a companion of brigands."

"I was able to do some service to Count Staroski, as, when travelling with his wife and child, and his brother, Count John, he was attacked by a pack of wolves. I have been staying with him for some weeks, and his brother has now had the kindness to accompany me here. He has thereby made my passage through the country easy, as we have travelled with fast horses in his sledge, and have always put up at the chateaux of nobles of his acquaintance. I have, therefore, avoided all risk of arrest at towns. In the letter forwarded to you I explained the real circumstances of the death of the Jew." 1. what is the chapter number?
2. what is the title?
3. who is the minister talking to?
4. what is his first name?
5. what did they first hear about him?
6. where?
7. how did they find out this was not true?
8. from who?
9. what did it say?
10. what else did it say?
11. who had joined him?
12. did he look as they thought he would?
13. what did they expect him to look like?
14. how was he instead?
15. who was Charlie able to work for?
16. did John get into a problem?
17. what was that?
18. was he alone?
19. how many people was he with?
20. Did John repay the help? Return numbered answers in your output.

output: 1. 14
2. The Battle Of Clissow.
3. Captain Carstairs
4. Charlie
5. he had been murdered
6. streets of Warsaw
7. they received a letter
8. Ramsay
9. he was accused of the murder of a Jew trader
10. he was in the company of a band of brigands
11. the man who went with him as his servant
12. no
13. a companion of brigands
14. a wealthy Polish noble
15. Count Staroski
16. yes
17. he was attacked by a pack of wolves
18. no
19. Three
20. yes

input: (CNN) -- Iran won't be attending this week's international peace conference on Syria because it won't embrace the framework laid out in a previous conference, U.N. and Iranian officials said Monday.

The last-minute invitation to Iran, a leading Syrian ally, had threatened to derail the talks after the leading Syrian opposition group and the United States spoke out against it. Louay Safi, a spokesman for the Syrian National Coalition, called Iran's attendance "a deal-breaker."

Iran announced Monday afternoon that it would not accept "any preconditions" for joining the talks, slated to begin Wednesday in Switzerland. That includes acceptance of the communique issued at the first Geneva conference in 2012, said Mohammad Khazaee, Tehran's U.N. ambassador.

"If the participation of Iran is conditioned to accept Geneva I communique, Iran will not participate in Geneva II conference," Khazaee said in a written statement Monday afternoon. Foreign Minister Javad Zarif had made a similar declaration on Iranian state TV earlier Monday.

U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon, who issued the invitation Sunday, believed he had Iran's assurance that it accepted the original Geneva declaration, his spokesman, Martin Nesirky, told reporters.

"The secretary-general is deeply disappointed by Iranian public statements today that are not at all consistent with that stated commitment," Nesirky said.The declaration "remains the internationally agreed framework for ending the crisis," he said -- and without Iran's acceptance, this week's conference "will proceed without Iran's participation," he added.

The goal of the talks is to set up a transitional government to help end the violence that has wracked the country. 1. Who will not be in attendance to the meeting?
2. why?
3. says who?
4. when?
5. What was the topic of the meeting?
6. Was Iran invited?
7. when?
8. who was against it?
9. what is the end result they want to achieve?
10. What kind of government do they want to establish?
11. why?
12. What as is caused?
13. Who made an announcement Monday?
14. What did Iran announce? Return numbered answers in your output.

output:
1. Iran
2. because it won't embrace the framework laid out in a previous conference
3. U.N. and Iranian officials
4. Monday
5. Syria
6. Yes
7. at the last-minute
8. the leading Syrian opposition group
9. peace
10. transitional
11. to help end the violence
12. unknown
13. U.N. and Iranian officials
14. that it would not accept "any preconditions" for joining the talks