IN: Eunice team, The NNG Eunice C/S is required to prepare and submit the semi annual and annual reports required by the facilities Title V Operating Permit which was issued by the State of New Mexico. The reports are required to be submitted to the state of New Mexico and the EPA by July 19, 2001. These reports are required even though the facility is not in operation. If you would like assistance in the preparation and submittal of each document, give me a call and we can set up a time to meet at the C/S to do each report. This should take about half a day.

Generate a subject line.

OUT: Title V annual certification and compliance monitoring report due date
IN: This is an email
COLUMBIA GAS TRANSMISSION CORPORATION NOTICE TO ALL INTERESTED PARTIES OCTOBER 08, 2001 Notice ID: 3163 5 - NO RESPONSE REQUIRED NOTE: The following is being provided by Columbia as notice to all of its shippers of potential outages or reductions in available capacity in the identified portions of the system due to construction activities, routine maintenance, modifications, tests or repairs undertaken to protect the integrity and performance capability of its storage and transmission facilities. The information provided below is subject to change for numerous reasons, including but not limited to, third-party controlled events and decisions, weather, work schedules, equipment availability, force majeure events, etc. Thus, while Columbia is willing to provide this notice and update it periodically as necessary, Columbia is unable to represent and warrant that the specific activities will occur, or that they will occur on or near the specified dates. SUBJECT: 2002 TENTATIVE OUTAGE SCHEDULE In February 2002, Columbia's Line BM-22 in Martin Co., KY will be out of service due to Highway relocation for three (3) days resulting in a reduction of approximately 23,000 Dth/d of production flowing through Kermit Compressor. This includes the following lines: P-94, V-55 and BM-18. In the spring of 2002, contingent upon the mining activity, Columbia's Line KA will be out of service for three (3) days due to a coal mining relocation tie in. Approximately 100,000 Dth/d of Appalachian production west of the May Fork valve on Line KA will be shut in. In the spring of 2002, Columbia's Boldman Compressor located in Pike Co., KY, will have one unit down for approximately two (2) months for annual maintenance which results in a 15,000 Dth/d flow reduction. Affected is Equitable's Hi-Hat (F3) pipeline, CNR's Boldman (CNR02) pipeline, and Appalachian production located on Columbia's Lines PM-3 and PM-17. In May-June 2002, Columbia's Line's BM-18, Line VM-141 and Line V-55 will be out of service for five (5) days due to a relocation for WV Rt. 52 in Mingo Co., WV. The affect, if any, on production is being evaluated. In July 2002, Line 1711 will be out of service for three (3) days due to a relocation of the Monongahela River crossing tie in. The affect, if any, on production is being evaluated. The following outages affect Equitable's Beaver Creek (H1) pipeline, and Appalachian production from Columbia's Boldman Compressor Station to Columbia's Huff Creek Compressor Station on Line KA, including Line KA-15. In March 2002, Columbia anticipates an outage of three (3) days on Columbia's Line SM-116 as a result of coal mining activity. In addition to the above listed production, Conoco's Grant (P1) pipeline and Appalachian production located on Line SM-116 will be affected. In June 2002, Columbia's Grant Compressor located in Mingo Co., WV will have one unit out of service for six (6) days which will result in a 50,000 Dth/d flow reduction. In August 2002, Columbia's Huff Creek Compressor located in Wyoming Co., WV will be out of service for one (1) week due to annual maintenance. In the fall of 2002, Columbia's Line KA will be out of service for three (3) days due to relocation for a highway expansion project on Rt. 119. The relocation is between Johns Creek and Canada, which will result in 100,000 Dth/d of production shut in west of the May Fork valve setting.

What is the subject?

OUT: TCO - 2002 TENTATIVE OUTAGE SCHEDULE
QUESTION: RBowers@nyiso.com writes to the NYISO_TECH_EXCHANGE Discussion List: The NYISO is delaying issuance of the November & December 1999 - 2nd Settlement Adjustments, scheduled for September 7th, by a week. The delay is necessary to make corrections to the re-engineered invoicing process under which these settlements will be made. Settlements for November 1999 through March 2000 were "trued-up" once under a process that only adjusted settlements at the hourly interval level. Upon realizing that the now superseded process was deficient in its ability to "true-up" settlements at the SCD interval level, the process was completely re-engineered and put into operation in February 2001. In order to perform the 2nd settlement adjustments [a.k.a. true-ups] for November through March under the new process, the 1st true-ups of these months must be reversed to create the billing determinant measurement set that was used in the 1st true-up. The newly acquired billing determinants for the 2nd settlement adjustments will then be netted against the set from the 1st true-ups. That delta will then become the amount invoiced for the 2nd settlement adjustment. This delay is to fix mapping problems observed between the old measurement set invoicing format and the new measurement set formats. Invoices will be issued once the mapping problems have been corrected and we am satisfied that the settlements can be readily reconciled by our Market Participants. The NYISO apologizes for this delay and any resultant problems. Regards,
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: November & December 1999 Settlement Adjustments
Please check the dates for that OpRisk seminar in New York and put those on my calendar tentatively. I got a message from Shona trying to schedule a trip to Mexico and she thought that the week of February 5th looked good. I assume that she checked with you and that my calendar looked clear. While I have not yet made a decision on attending the NY seminar, I do need to hold those dates. I left Shona a message telling her that the week of February 19 would be better. --Sally
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: Calendar
Scott, I currently have view only access for EOL. Can you set me up with a transaction id? I will run Columbia Gulf Mainline, unless you have other plans. Scott
Answer: EOL
Q: Hi guys, In looking at CRRA's comments to the draft LOI. I have these questions: 1. I'm not sure what we mean by EPC contract. Is this referring to the Fuel Cell document we are working now, or is there to be another layer? I know this may depend on whether CRRA or someone else is doing the balance of the construction activities. 2. He expects one EPC contract, and we had tried to leave room for multiple contracts. Does anyone care? 3. Does CRRA get a full refund of the purchase price if the fuel cells fail the performance tests? We have discussed with FCE the concept of a proportional reduction if the performance is within 10 percent, then a full reduction as to the failing unit(s) only. Also, are we planning to mark up the fuel cell contract to recover our fee? Is our fee at risk for the fuel cells failing to perform? Thanks,
Propose a subject line
A:
CRRA LOI