In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.
One example is below.
Q: Comment: President lied under oath about consensual sex...
Not the same thing as rape.
A: Sexual-explicit
Rationale: This comment explicitly mentions "consensual sex" and "rape", and thus is sexual-explicit.
Q: Comment: It seems to me, Elagabalus, that your comparator, slavery, is somewhat different than you state it. Surely, at the same time as the law was changing, the Biblical exegesis was also changing. The religious foundation for the discrimination evaporated in tandem with the evaporation of separate by equal legal arguments. Theologians were arguing against the exegesis just as vigorously as legislators were arguing against legal racism.

Unfortunately, re gay marriage, the theologians are lagging behind the legislators, and it is this sad fact that renders on-going gay discrimination in the name of religious conscience not exactly the same thing.

Those of us who reject the religious arguments against gay marriage must be very careful, it seems to me, that we do not end up arguing that the law need not take religious conscience into account. As long formal religion continues to reject gay marriage, there is, it seems to me, very sadly, a need to respect bigoted but honest consciences. Sad!!
A:
Non-sexual-explicit