In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine the neutral choice based on your inference from the statement and your commonsense knowledge. The neutral choice is a sentence that neither agrees nor disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3', corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence. If sentence X agrees with sentence Y, one's correctness follows from the other one. If sentence X disagrees with sentence Y, they can not be correct at the same time.

Input: Consider Input: Statement: Consider Ehrlichman's reference to a certain left-wing Harvard professor, [first name unknown] Pomerantz, or whatever his name is, whose generosity towards the George McGovern campaign raises Nixon's suspicions. Choices: 1. Pomerantz's generosity raised Nixon's respect for him. 2. Pomerantz's generosity raised Nixon's doubts because of past experiences. 3. Pomerantz's generosity raised Nixon's doubts.

Output: 2

Input: Consider Input: Statement: There has been a Church of the Holy Sepulcher on this spot for some 1,650 years, ever since Queen Helena (the mother of Emperor Constantine, who made Christianity the state religion of Rome) visited Jerusalem in a.d. 326 and identified Golgotha, the site of the crucifixion itself. Choices: 1. Queen Helena supported her son, though she herself never did convert to Christianity, 2. The Church of the Holy Sepulcher has been absent from this spot ever since Queen Helena had it torn down. 3. After Queen Helena's visit to Jerusalem, there was a church on this spot for over 1500 years.

Output: 1

Input: Consider Input: Statement: filed February 22, 2002)); therefore, we made no changes pending the outcome of that litigation. Choices: 1. There were no changes made pending the outcome of the litigation. 2. Changes were presented pending the outcome of the litigation. 3. There will be changes presented at a later date.
Output: 3