[QUESTION] Given the sentence "A mountain biker riding his bike down a muddy path with mud splashing into the air and the biker is covered in mud." is it true that "The rider is mad because they are dirty."?
The bike rider may not be mad due to the mus splashing on him.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

Q: Premise: "A oklahoma football player standing."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A oklahoma football player standing." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A: An Oklahoma football player is the same as a football player.
The answer is yes.

QUESTION: Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "One child with a colourful toy and another child reaching up."
Hypothesis: "The children take interest in the same toy."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell

Let's solve it slowly: A child holding a toy and another child reaching up are not assumed to be interested in the same toy.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

[QUESTION] If "A caravan of green and red vehicles going up a mountain." does that mean that "A group of vehicles is going up the mountain."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A caravan of green and red vehicles is the same as a group of vehicles going up the mountain.
The answer is yes.

Q: Given the sentence "A little girl looks at a birthday cake while a man holds a baby." can we conclude that "A little girl looks at her baby sister's cake."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A: A birthday cake is not assumed to be the baby sister's cake.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

[QUESTION] Premise: "A baby with pacifier playing on a toy horse outdoors."
Hypothesis: "The baby is getting a bath."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
The baby getting a bath contradicts with baby playing on a toy horse.
The answer is no.