The era of mass persecution and execution of heretics under the banner of Christianity came to an end in 1826 with the last execution of a "heretic", Cayetano Ripoll, by the Catholic Inquisition.
If it is possible to answer this question, answer it for me (else, reply "unanswerable"): What ended in the 18th century?
Ah, so.. unanswerable

The documentation regarding Raciborz and Albert's tenure is the earliest surviving of the use of the clan name and cry defining the honorable status of Polish knights. The names of knightly genealogiae only came to be associated with heraldic devices later in the Middle Ages and in the early modern period. The Polish clan name and cry ritualized the ius militare, i.e., the power to command an army; and they had been used some time before 1244 to define knightly status. (Gorecki 1992, pp. 183185).
If it is possible to answer this question, answer it for me (else, reply "unanswerable"): In 1244 the power to command and army had been used to do what?
Ah, so.. define knightly status

The difficult question is whether federal judicial power extends to formulating binding precedent through strict adherence to the rule of stare decisis. This is where the act of deciding a case becomes a limited form of lawmaking in itself, in that an appellate court's rulings will thereby bind itself and lower courts in future cases (and therefore also impliedly binds all persons within the court's jurisdiction). Prior to a major change to federal court rules in 2007, about one-fifth of federal appellate cases were published and thereby became binding precedents, while the rest were unpublished and bound only the parties to each case.
If it is possible to answer this question, answer it for me (else, reply "unanswerable"): Why is stare decisis a limited form of lawmaking?
Ah, so..
an appellate court's rulings will thereby bind itself and lower courts in future cases