Question:
Read the text and answer the questions.
(CNN) -- The Supreme Court has just agreed to take on the case of Fisher v. University of Texas. Abigail Fisher, a white woman, argues that she has been a victim of the university's race-conscious admission policies; the university contends that its drive for racial and ethnic diversity is educationally enriching -- a benefit to all students.

Will the ugly discourse that generally characterizes debate over racially preferential policies disappear with the wave of a magic Supreme Court wand? It seems unlikely. The issue is a cat with many more than nine lives. It arrived in the early 1970s and, despite many attacks, some of which have taken the form of amendments to state constitutions, it has survived in pretty fine fettle.

The court will have only eight justices to hear the arguments. Elena Kagan, having been involved in the case as solicitor general in the Obama administration, has bowed out of participation. Her absence, however, leaves five justices likely to express at least some degree of skepticism about the racial preferences given to non-Asian minorities in the admissions process.

Has the University of Texas been enriched by academic diversity? Maybe. But equally likely is the possibility that racial double standards reinforce stereotypes about smart whites and even smarter Asians. There are certainly wide gaps in the average SAT scores between blacks and Hispanics, on the one hand, and whites and Asians, on the other hand.

Among freshmen entering the University of Texas in 2009 who did not fall into the top 10% of their high school class (automatic admission at the university), Asians scored at the 93rd percentile of 2009 SAT takers nationwide, whites at the 89th percentile, Hispanics at the 80th percentile and blacks at the 52nd percentile. Startling? No. This picture has been well known for a long time. Heartbreaking, yes, because the numbers mean the underperforming minority students are being woefully ill served by the K-12 school system. Moreover, arriving at institutions of higher education with an academic disadvantage, they do not catch up, as it has become clear.
1. What is the Supreme Court going to hear?
2. How many justices will hear about the case?
3. Who bowed out?
4. Who is the person in the case?
5. Is she a Hispanic?
6. What race is she?
7. Why is she going to court?
8. What does the university say about its racial and ethnic diversity?
9. Has there been many cases like this in the Supreme Court?
10. When did it first come to light?
11. What did Asians score on the SAT nationwide?
12. Was this startling?

Numbered answers:
1. The case of Fisher v. University of Texas.
2. Eight
3. Elena Kagan
4. Abigail Fisher
5. No
6. White
7. She has been a victim of the university's race-conscious admission policies
8. That it's educationally enriching
9. Yes
10. Early 1970s
11. At the 93rd percentile
12. No

Question:
Read the text and answer the questions.
(CNN) -- Roger Federer secured a record-equaling seventh Wimbledon title to dash the hopes of Andy Murray and a partisan Centre Court crowd.

Federer made it 17 grand slam titles to his name after a two-and-a-half-year drought and matched the haul of American Pete Sampras at the All England Club.

The Swiss will return to the top of the world rankings as a result of his 4-6 7-5 6-3 6-4 victory, meaning he will match his hero Sampras' record of 286 weeks at No. 1.

For Murray, the first Briton to reach a men's singles final at Wimbledon in 74 years, it represented his fourth defeat in major finals, and his pain was acutely felt by a fervent crowd at Wimbledon.

Sampras: I hated (and loved) Wimbledon

Federer's triumph was his first at Wimbledon since 2009, with his last major win coming at the Australian Open in 2010 when he also beat Murray.

"It's amazing," Federer told the host broadcaster. "It equals me with Pete Sampras, who is my hero, so it feels amazing.

"I think I played some of my best tennis in the last couple of matches. It's worked out so many times here that I play my best in semis and the final. I couldn't be more happy -- it feels being great being back here as the winner. It's a great moment."

Federer's victory means he is only the second player in the men's game to have held the top ranking over the age of 30, alongside Andre Agassi.
1. How did Sampras feel about Wimbledon?
2. Who is Federer's Idol?
3. Are their records the same now?
4. How many Wimbledon titles does Federer have?
5. How many grand slam?
6. Where will this put the Swiss?
7. How long has he been there?
8. Who else spent that long there?
9. When was the last time he won at Wimbledon?
10. What did he win in 2010?
11. Who did he beat?
12. Is he older than 30?
13. Is he the only one that old to have kept the top rank?
14. How many others?
15. Who?
16. Who did he win against to get his seventh Wimbledon?
17. How many times has he lost in major finals?
18. Was the crowd disappointed?
19. Where is he from?
20. When was the last time they had a man in the singles final at Wimbledon?

Numbered answers:
1. He hated and loved Wimbledon
2. Sampras
3. Yes
4. Seven
5. 17
6. the top of the world rankings
7. 286 weeks
8. Sampras
9. 2009
10. the Australian Open
11. Murray
12. Yes
13. No
14. One
15. Andre Agassi
16. Andy Murray
17. four times
18. Yes
19. Britain
20. 74 years ago

Question:
Read the text and answer the questions.
In European history, the Middle Ages or medieval period lasted from the 5th to the 15th century. It began with the collapse of the Western Roman Empire and merged into the Renaissance and the Age of Discovery. The Middle Ages is the middle period of the three traditional divisions of Western history: Antiquity, Medieval period, and Modern period. The Medieval period is itself subdivided into the Early, the High, and the Late Middle Ages.

Depopulation, deurbanisation, invasion, and movement of peoples, which had begun in Late Antiquity, continued in the Early Middle Ages. The barbarian invaders, including various Germanic peoples, formed new kingdoms in what remained of the Western Roman Empire. In the 7th century, North Africa and the Middle Eastonce part of the Eastern Roman Empirecame under the rule of the Caliphate, an Islamic empire, after conquest by Muhammad's successors. Although there were substantial changes in society and political structures, the break with Antiquity was not complete. The still-sizeable Byzantine Empire survived in the east and remained a major power. The empire's law code, the Code of Justinian, was rediscovered in Northern Italy in 1070 and became widely admired later in the Middle Ages. In the West, most kingdoms incorporated the few extant Roman institutions. Monasteries were founded as campaigns to Christianise pagan Europe continued. The Franks, under the Carolingian dynasty, briefly established the Carolingian Empire during the later 8th and early 9th century. It covered much of Western Europe, but later succumbed to the pressures of internal civil wars combined with external invasionsVikings from the north, Magyars from the east, and Saracens from the south.
1. what is the article about?
2. is it called something else?
3. what?
4. how long was it?
5. what even signaled it's begging?
6. when did it end?
7. is there a division?
8. just one?
9. how many?
10. what is divided?
11. are the division named?
Numbered answers:
1. the Middle Ages
2. Yes
3. the medieval period
4. 10 centuries
5. the collapse of the Western Roman Empire
6. when the Renaissance began
7. yes
8. No
9. three
10. Western history
11. Yes