In this task, you're given a statement, and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence clearly disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3' corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

[EX Q]: Statement: He reached for the arm around his neck and began breaking it free from its stranglehold. Choices: 1. He pulled the arm off of his neck. 2. He punched the person strangling him. 3. He allowed the arm to continue choking him.
[EX A]: 3

[EX Q]: Statement: like constantly it seemed like but fortunately i had small children and i didn't have to go and it's not that i mean i think everyone should have to serve on the jury it's just that Choices: 1. Small children should serve on juries all the time 2. Having small children is a way of getting out of jury duty 3. Because I had small children, I did not have to serve jury duty
[EX A]: 1

[EX Q]: Statement: Some participants suggested that the PCAOB consider the banking industry to provide examples of the integration of federal and state regulation and lessons learned about that structure from the savings and loan and banking crises. Choices: 1. They wanted them to see that there was still hope. 2. Those that participated urged them to look at examples of what had been done and lessons from others mistakes. 3. They did not think it was worthwhile to go over the mistakes from previous banking crises.
[EX A]:
3