input: It's the end of class.When the bell rings, students of Luohu Foreign Languages School in Shenzhen quickly take out their telephones.They want to log on to their micro blogs to check the interesting things.They want to see what have happened in the last hour. Since several years ago, more and more people have used micro blogs in our country.Recent surveys shows that most students in middle schools have a micro blog and some even update their blogs over five times per day. "We learn many fresh and interesting things on micro blogs and they have become popular topics in class," said Kitty Jiang, 14."If you do not know about them, you are _ ." It is also a great place for students to say something about themselves."My parents always ask me to study hard, and encourage me before exams, but it really gives me pressure ," said Alan Wang, 15."I share these feelings on my micro blog.My friends always give me answers in the same situation.This makes me feel better." But parents worry that micro blogging could be a waste of time.Some unhealthy information may even bring danger to kids, they said. Mr Shen, a professor asks parents not to worry too much as long as kids are not crazy about micro blogging.Maybe it can become a window for parents to understand their children."If parents can read their children's micro blogs, they'll know what they think, they can know more about their children and help them solve their problems," he said.He also gives some advice for kids. -Don't micro blog for more than one hour a day. -Never micro blog in class. -Try to talk face to face with people from time to time. -Don't believe all the information on a micro blog. 1. What school do they go to?
2. Do they call their friends when class is over?
3. What do they do?
4. Who is fourteen years old?
5. Who is 15?
6. How do parents feel about these blogs?
7. What is the professor's name?
8. Does he set a time limit for children blogging?
9. how long is it?
10. Where should they not blog?
11. How do they know class is over? Return numbered answers in your output.

output: 1. Luohu Foreign Languages School
2. No
3. log on to their micro blogs
4. Kitty Jiang
5. Alan Wang
6. parents worry that micro blogging could be a waste of time.
7. Mr Shen
8. Yes
9. less than one hour a day.
10. in class
11. When the bell rings

input: (CNN) -- The surviving pilot of Virgin Galactic SpaceShipTwo told authorities he was unaware the feather system had been unlocked early by his co-pilot.

The spaceship disintegrated 45,000 feet above the Mojave Desert on October 31, killing co-pilot Michael Tyner Alsbury and injuring co-pilot Peter Siebold, who managed to parachute to the ground.

Siebold was interviewed last week by the National Transportation Safety Board. He described being "extracted from the vehicle as a result of the break-up sequence and unbuckled from his seat at some point before the parachute deployed automatically," according to a release from the NTSB.

Earlier this month, the NTSB tweeted that Alsbury "moved the lock/unlock handle into unlock position."

...the copilot, who was in right seat, moved the lock/unlock handle into unlock position; he did not survive accident. #SpaceShipTwo

But that mishap alone doesn't explain why the feathering started, since no one moved the feathering handle.

During feathering, two pieces on the back of the vehicle -- the "feathers" -- lift up perpendicular to the spaceship, making the vehicle look as though it's arching its back as it descends.

The wreckage has been recovered and will be used for follow-up examinations.

Test pilot's workplace a cold, harsh environment

1. How many feet above ground did the spaceship disintegrate?
2. Who survived the accident?
3. Who was killed?
4. When did this happen?
5. Who moved the lock/unlock handle according to the NTSB?
6. What system was unlocked?
7. What does NTSB stand for?
8. What happens during feathering?
9. Has the wreckage been found?
10. What did Siebold say deployed automatically?
11. What desert were they over?
12. Did anyone move the feathering handle?
13. What does feathering make the spaceship look like when it's coming down?
14. What was the name of the spaceship?
15. Was Siebold injured?
16. Did he break his leg?
17. What will happen with the wreckage that was found?
18. When was Siebold interviewed?
19. When did the NTSB tweet about Alsbury?
20. Who was in right seat? Return numbered answers in your output.

output: 1. 45,000 feet
2. Peter Siebold
3. Michael Tyner Alsbury
4. October 31
5. Alsbury
6. Feather system
7. National Transportation Safety Board
8. Two pieces on the back of the vehicle lift up
9. Yes
10. Parachute
11. Mojave Desert
12. No
13. As though it's arching its back
14. Virgin Galactic SpaceShipTwo
15. Yes
16. unknown
17. Will be used for follow-up examinations.
18. Last week
19. Earlier this month
20. Alsbury

input: The phrase "in whole or in part" has been subject to much discussion by scholars of international humanitarian law. The International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia found in Prosecutor v. Radislav Krstic Trial Chamber I Judgment IT-98-33 (2001) ICTY8 (2 August 2001) that Genocide had been committed. In Prosecutor v. Radislav Krstic Appeals Chamber Judgment IT-98-33 (2004) ICTY 7 (19 April 2004) paragraphs 8, 9, 10, and 11 addressed the issue of in part and found that "the part must be a substantial part of that group. The aim of the Genocide Convention is to prevent the intentional destruction of entire human groups, and the part targeted must be significant enough to have an impact on the group as a whole." The Appeals Chamber goes into details of other cases and the opinions of respected commentators on the Genocide Convention to explain how they came to this conclusion. 1. What is the aim of the Genocide Convention?
2. Which phrase has been up for much discussion?
3. By whom?
4. Who found that mass murder had taken place?
5. What was the date of the judgement?
6. Which paragrahs addressed the issue?
7. And what did it find?
8. What did Radislav Krstic like to have for dinner? Return numbered answers in your output.

output:
1. to prevent the intentional destruction of entire human groups
2. "in whole or in part"
3. by scholars of international humanitarian law
4. the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia
5. 19 April 2004
6. paragraphs 8, 9, 10, and 11
7. that the part must be a substantial part of that group.
8. unknown