The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.

[Q]: Context: 'I was thinking that you could give me 3 food packages and i will give you 3 water? What do you think?' 'If I do that I would also like all three firewood' 'Why do you need all 3 firewoods?'
Utterance: 'I get cold pretty easily. Extra firewood would help me stay warm. And if I give up all food, I'll need another way to keep my body warm.'
[A]: No

[Q]: Context: 'Tell me, how stocked up are you on food and firewood?' 'I have firewood, what I need mainly is water, then food' 'Ah, I see. I have plenty of firewood as well but mostly need food and some water.'
Utterance: 'so let me suggest a split, I get two water and two food, you get one food, one water and three firewood'
[A]: No

[Q]: Context: 'i will get 3 food, 1 firewood and 0 water then' 'Sound perfect. Thank you so much. ' 'lets do the deal then'
Utterance: 'I agree. Good luck with your trip!'
[A]:
No