QUESTION: Attached is an Excel spreadsheet showing the costs to build a 20-mile 20" pipeline from PG&E to Bakersfield. Thereis a sheet for the pipeline and one for the measurement. The left side is Bakersfield and the remainder are benchmarks of recent projects in California. The cost estimates are + 30% Ron M.
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: Bakersfield Power Plants Project

QUESTION: Gerald, I have been asked to review the referenced Agreement for EES Legal. I have been informed by Shane Lakho that you participated in negotiations with Tennessee Gas, that you had signed off on the terms in Paragraphs 7 and 9 of Exhibit A, and that Tennessee Gas was not willing to engage in further negotiation. My instructions had been to compare the agreements to an EES-approved standard form, and to initial them if theywere substantially in compliance with the standard. The Tennessee Gas Agreement deletes Enron's warranty disclaimer, so I pointed this out to Jim Keller. He said to contact you and if you had no problem with it, that I should go ahead and initial the document. Could you please advise as to whether I was correctly informed regarding your approval of the terms in the Agreement? Thanks. Scott L. Franck
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, Electronic Data Interchange Trading Partner Agreement

QUESTION: As you should now be aware the preschedulers were unable to get all of their tags in by the tagging deadline on Friday. Cara has left a color coded sheet of delayed tags that the real time group must implement between 4 hours and 1 hour prior to the power flowing. Please take a look at this sheet when coming in on shift. Also, there are two tags that need special attention tomorrow (7/2) evening. Tag numbers 25843 and 25870 have been printed out and attached to Cara's list. These two tags were flowing through the CISO and needed to be checked out day ahead by PacifiCorp and the ISO. Unfortunately the ISO and PAC needed real tags not delayed tags in order to allow PACs schedule to flow. Therefore per my discussion with Dick Dowdy at PAC, he has created a tag showing the total of 35 MW coming out of his system (tag # 9152Y) in order to check out with the ISO. THE REAL TIME GROUP MUST DO THE FOLLOWING ON THE PAC TAGS: 1. send the delayed tags out prior to the times indicated on Cara's sheet but no sooner than 4 hrs prior to energy flow. 2. On the pacificorp tags referenced above, please call PAC after sending the delayed tags and tell them to kill their tag number 9152Y. 3. Call the ISO to inform them of the tag change and give them the delayed tag numbers. 4. call PSCO and inform them you have submitted the tags. Please make sure this is happens ! If this is not taken care of the schedule won't flow and Enron will be charged liquidated damages by PacifiCorp. If you have ANY questions regarding these tags or any other tags on Cara's list, do not hesitate to contact Cara, Bill, or myself on this matter. Cheers,
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS:
Tags