In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine the neutral choice based on your inference from the statement and your commonsense knowledge. The neutral choice is a sentence that neither agrees nor disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3', corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence. If sentence X agrees with sentence Y, one's correctness follows from the other one. If sentence X disagrees with sentence Y, they can not be correct at the same time.

Ex Input:
Statement: What it does mean, though, is that commoditization does its work not by becoming a reality (which would entail ever-shrinking margins and stagnant stock prices) but by remaining a perpetually present threat. Choices: 1. Commoditization works for industrialized nations not by being a reality but by being a threat. 2. Commoditization works not by being a reality but by being a threat. 3. Commoditization works not by being a threat but by being a reality.

Ex Output:
1

Ex Input:
Statement: 'Wouldn't that be extremely dangerous?' Choices: 1. I was concerned about the dangers involved. 2. That seems to be the safest route. 3. Would that not be hazardous?

Ex Output:
1

Ex Input:
Statement: Law schools, said the executive director of a major New York public law agency who asked to remain anonymous, are profit centers. Choices: 1. According to the executive director of a New York law agency, law schools are run only with virtuous goals in mind. 2. People graduating from law schools often don't have a proper law education. 3. One administrator at a New York law agency said that law schools are run for profit.

Ex Output:
2