Q: In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence can be inferred from the statement. Incorrect choices change the meaning in important ways or have details that are not mentioned in the statement. Indicate your answer as 1,2, or 3 corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.
Statement: In a sense, though, what's most striking about the WTO case is not that Kodak lost, but that it put so much energy into winning. Choices: 1. Kodak used enormous resources in the WTO case. 2. Kodak was a dog with a bone in the WTO case. 3. Kodak was easy to put down.
A:
1