Problem: Here is a premise:
especially to come home and you know if he didn't knock real loudly and clearly i would have gotten in trouble the next day i'm sure

Here is a hypothesis:
I was hiding out when that guy knocked real loud.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Sentence 1: These trends present a range of challenges that have no boundaries.

Sentence 2: The challenges have been set to a limit.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: no

Question:
we'll keep talking if we want to come up with something else let's see

Does it follow that "If we want to come up with something else then we need to keep talking."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
yes

Q: If Michael Huffington in California in 1994, can we say that "Huffington in Texas in 1997."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A: no

Premise:
"The sculpted Buddha is seen with the wheel, symbolic of his law, and two deer, referring to the park at Sarnath where he held his first sermon."
Hypothesis: Ancient and beyond priceless, the sculpted Buddha refers to one of the most important events in his life: his first sermon.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

it is not possible to tell

Sentence 1: It is not possible to place confidence limits on the NOEC and LOEC derived from a given test, and it is difficult to quantify the precision of the NOEC-LOEC endpoints between tests.

Sentence 2: A given test is not ample to place limits on the NOEC and LOEC.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer:
yes