IN: The following limited liability companies are being considered for dissolution this week. Please let me know by 1:00 p.m. on Wednesday, December 12, 2001 if there is any reason not to dissolve these limited liability companies. If I receive no responses, we will proceed with the cancellations. Please distribute this memo to all interested parties within your group. Chiricahua I LLC (Company #1382-CHRI) Chiricahua II LLC (Company #1383-CHR2) Chiricahua III LLC (Company #1384-CHR3) Chiricahua IV LLC (Company #1385-CHR4) Chiricahua V LLC (Company #1386-CHR5) Chiricahua VI LLC (Company #1387-CHR6) Chiricahua VII LLC (Company #1388-CHR7) Chiricahua VIII LLC (Company #1389-CHR8) Chiricahua IX LLC (Company #1390-CHR9) Chiricahua X LLC (Company #1391-CHR10) Chiricahua XI LLC (Company #1392-CHR11) Chiricahua XII LLC (Company #1393-CHR12) Chiricahua XIII LLC (Company #1394-CHR13) Chiricahua XIV LLC (Company #1395-CHR14)

Generate a subject line.

OUT: Proposed Cancellation of 14 LLC's - Expedited Response Request needed
IN: This is an email
Trena: Can you please let me know if the docs from Chase are to amend the existing Repo Agreement between ENA and Chase? What type of transactions will you be doing with Chase? The docs I received are from a woman named Monica Turner and she has not returned my phone call. She did not provide an email address so I don't know how to get in touch with Chase. Can you help? Maybe get me another name? Thanks. Sara

What is the subject?

OUT: Chase repo
QUESTION: Please review the attached termination letter. Crescendo will need to sign this. We can forward this letter to Crescendo for signature unless you would rather handle that. Let me know. Thanks.
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: OGE Energy Resources Termination Letter
Tom: EGLI is holding a $420,000 LC that expires 12/21/01 covering a deal with Energy Service Providers LLC. According to our records, this deal has terminated. Have we been paid? Are we owed anything? Would we have any grounds for drawing prior to the expiry date?
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: LC's
The information contained herein is based on sources that we believe to be reliable, but we do not represent that it is accurate or complete. Nothing contained herein should be considered as an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any financial instruments discussed herein. Any opinions expressed herein are solely those of the author. As such, they may differ in material respects from those of, or expressed or published by on behalf of Carr Futures or its officers, directors, employees or affiliates. ? 2001 Carr Futures The charts are now in the most recent version of Adobe Acrobat 4.0 and they should print clearly from Adobe Acrobat Reader 3.0 or higher. Adobe Acrobat Reader 4.0 may be downloaded for FREE from www.adobe.com. (See attached file: ngas33.pdf)(See attached file: StripmatrixNG33.pdf)(See attached file: SpreadmatrixNG33.pdf) - ngas33.pdf - StripmatrixNG33.pdf - SpreadmatrixNG33.pdf
Answer: daily nat gas charts and matrices as attachments 6/8
Q: Today FERC issued the following draft orders: NYISO TEP and Bid Cap (ER01-3001): Commission granted NYISO's request to extend the currently effective $1000/MWh Bid Caps on certain NYISO adminstered markets, and to extend its Temporary Extraordinary Procedures for Correcting Market Design Flaws and Addressing Transitional Abnormalities, until the Northeastern RTO is operational. The Commission ordered NYISO to narrow the scope of the TEP, and to file tariff sheets doing so within 30 days. NYISO proposed virtual bidding procedures (ER01-3009; ER01-3153): Tariff changes to implement virtual bidding were approved. The changes would allow market participants to bid non-physical generation and load into the day-ahead market and settle the bids in the real-time market. Also accepted were NYISOs Market Mitigation Measures to address gaming or market power strategies that might emerge as a result of the virtual bidding. NYISO - Cost responsibility for new interconnections. (ER01-2967): Tariff changes allocating cost responsibility for interconnection facilities. The provisions allocate to developers 100% of the cost of facilities necessary to physically interconnect the project. Additionally, developers are allocated the coswts for transmission system upgrades that would not have been made "but for" the interconnection, minus the cost of any facilities that the NYISO's regional plan dictates would have been necessary anyway for load growth and reliability purposes. ISO-NE - Interim Bid Caps (ER01-3086): Commission approved extension of bid caps until the Northeastern RTO is operational. Calpine v. ISO-NE (EL01-124): Commission granted complaint by Calpine and Mirant, finding that ISO-NE has amended Market Rule 5 to exclude external contracts from setting the energy clearing price, in violation of a Commission order. If you need further information, please let me know. Susan Lindberg x30596
Propose a subject line
A:
Orders issued today in NYISO and ISO-NE proceedings