Question:
Based on the premise "In other words, we want to invite all those who would normally be excluded.", can we conclude that "We want to invite the homeless people of New York to have dinner with us. "? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
it is not possible to tell

Question: Sentence A: GSA has incorporated these policies into the Federal Property Management Regulations5 and the Federal Travel Regulation,6 applicable to most federal civilian employees.

Sentence B: The regulations that the GSA have in place help federal civilian employees.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question: It is a society in which every want is fulfilled.
The society ignores what anyone wants.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Problem: Here is a premise:
We would have died last night if it were not for you.

Here is a hypothesis:
If not for you, we would have died last night.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Sentence 1: yeah yeah that's basically the kinds of bills we have are on our budget are you know the needs the have to haves and you know those kinds of things uh we don't have a lot of uh you know like JC Penny's in our in our budget and uh maybe twice a year we're to where i can let my wife go clothes shopping like that and

Sentence 2: We only have the critical needs on our budget.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: yes

Premise:
"There were legal services offices in 24 locations from Walla Walla to Port Angeles, from Clarkston and Colville to Chehalis and Longview, from Seattle to Spokane."
Hypothesis: It's free to receive legal advice from legal services offices in Port Angeles but not in Spokane.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
it is not possible to tell