input question: An article recommends a cup of shade coffee. If this premise is true, does that tell us:"The article slams shade coffee and doesn't prescribe a cup to anyone."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: no

Question:
Based on the premise "More importantly, we do not know how much of business mail is used for bill-paying or advertising.", can we conclude that "We have a detailed breakdown of what kind of mail is used."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
no

Question: Sentence A: He was of middle height, and squarely built to match his jaw.

Sentence B: He has a jaw.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Question: This work is intended to provide pragmatic guidance that federal agencies can consider in determining how best to integrate CIO functions into their respective organizations.
Federal organization have no needs for CIO's in their agencies.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Problem: Here is a premise:
Based on its economic impact, the rule was determined by the Office of Management and Budget to be a significant regulatory action within the meaning of Executive Order

Here is a hypothesis:
The Office of Management and Budget decided that the rule was a regulatory action.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Question:
Such a state, with a constitution and identical rights for all citizens, could guarantee long-term security in a way that the current fake peace doesn't.

Does it follow that "A state with constitution and equal rights for all citizens could guarantee long-term security."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
yes