Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.

Example Input: Hmm...I too worked in DOC prior to Department level status when it was still an entity of H&SS under Helen Bierne thru to it's morphing into a Department. It has grown a lot. More staff, more inmates, more institutions. As with any entity that gets large, especially government, "Murphy's Law" at all levels kicks in all the much harder. Kevin Brew and Gerald Tamura commented. These people have "seen this elephant" during long careers and no doubt could speak at length.Time will tell how Dean Williams as Commissioner will work out. But one word of caution to him: Don't be the type of Commissioner that places the staff in the position of becoming more concerned of the "figurative knife" in the back from administration rather than being able to concentrate on their job. It has happened all too often.
Example Output: Yes

Example Input: Entry on mental illness is added to AP Stylebook May 7, 2013

"It is the right time to address how journalists handle questions of mental illness in coverage," said AP Senior Vice President and Executive Editor Kathleen Carroll. "This isn't only a question of which words one uses to describe a person's illness. There are important journalistic questions, too...

Do not use derogatory terms, such as insane, crazy/crazed, nuts or deranged, unless they are part of a quotation that is essential to the story....

Avoid descriptions that connote pity, such as afflicted with, suffers from or victim of. Rather, he has obsessive-compulsive disorder....

Avoid using mental health terms to describe non-health issues. Don't say that an awards show, for example, was schizophrenic.

Use the term mental or psychiatric hospital, not asylum.

http://www.ap.org/content/press-release/2013/entry-on-mental-illness-is-added-to-ap-stylebook
Example Output: No

Example Input: Illusions.... Most Alaskans make no net payment for any State or Local services. There it is. So whimpering about tax load is almost laughable. The only folk who really pay taxes in Alaska are 1%ers, and we all know where that discussion is going.

No sense talking about shifting the PFD, because that scam is a shell game with a bad end. Why? Because most in Alaska really use their PFD to fund their contribution to local government, that's why. And once you let the bully boys into reserved funds, you have the foxes camped in the henhouse - good luck.

Nor can we as a State cut anything near enough to maintain the quality of life, and ever focus group massaged by very elected ideologue to argue the contrary has foiled its promoter, eventually noting that additional taxing is acceptable in order to maintain quality of life, as long as tax revenues are not wasted....
Example Output:
Yes