ED: EWEB has requested a blackline of the ISDA and is ready to sign next week. Your MAC references the "Electric System" which is defined in the Bond Indenture which I sent to you earlier today. It looks to me like the Electric System includes physical and intangible assets acquired by the Board as a separate utility system, including generating and transmission facilities and the Trojan Project (not sure what this is). I've asked Stephanie to revise our docs to incorporate these definitions. Please review the CSA when Stephanie sends it to you (and comment) and I can send first thing on Tuesday. Thanks. Sara Stephanie: Please send Ed a copy of the blacklined CSA when you are done.
Answer: EWEB MAC
Here is an email: David, Hello, I hope all is well with you. I was out last week on holiday and am just now getting back into the swing of things. Alan and I have spoken about your contract, and I am getting in touch with the CU lawyers to work on an appropriate form for Australia. I will be keep you apprised of the status. Have a good weekend. Michelle
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: Employment Contract
Q: Here is the sample. Email this to your customer to review. They need to see our special provisions on the last page of the GISB. Have your contact call me to discuss the GISB when ready.
Propose a subject line
A: GISB Sample
IN: As you know the ENA OTC is actively working with the Analyst and Associate Program to develop greater talent flow into ENA. We are presently working on a number of initiatives to improve how this is working and significantly improve communication flow and responsiveness. However in this regard we also need you to help make sure we have clear lines of communication within ENA regarding A&A resource levels, performance, rotations and retention efforts. In this regard we would like for each of you to take the lead for your groups needs and ensure that any requests, questions or concerns about A&A's in your area are passed through you to either Ted Bland (ENA Recuitment Team Lead - x35275) or Jana Giovannani (ENA liaison from the AA Program - x39233) or myself. It is important that we are discerning about what we do with our A&A resources and plan carefully and accurately for our future needs, in this regard we need for you personally (or a senior member of your team who you may optionally delegate this task to) will take the time to review any A&A resource requests from your team before passing them onto us. In addition, given the importance of these resources, we will be inviting you to a regular bi-monthly meeting to discuss ENA A&A matters. We will confirm the first date in due course. In the meantime if you would like to volunteer another senior member of your team to assume this reponsibility please supply their name as soon as possible. Please call with any questions.

Generate a subject line.

OUT: ENA Analysts and Associates
IN: This is an email
Ken, we are working with a team that is building ethanol plants throughout the Southeast and the Midwest, and we are in the process of arranging the right capital partner as well as identifying the right strategic partner for that endeavor. The other players in this ambitious project have relationships into Enron, but I thought that you might be able to shove me in the right direction of the person to talk to there. I hope all is well with you, and one day when you are in the DC area and have nothing better to do you will let me have the opportunity to visit over dinner and reflect on how many years it has been since you and we created the Natural Gas Clearing House. We are having a lot of fun putting together large private equity deals and you might find that aspect of what we do as possibly interesting as well. We have expanded into the energy and utilities space as telecomm and technology have had their share of problems. In any event, would appreciate the input and look forward to a visit in the not too distant future. Best regards, Tom

What is the subject?

OUT: Ethanol Plant Project
CONFIDENTIAL Because many of the same people would be involved in the below-referenced telecons, both of which relate to developing public and gov relations strategies, some in the context of legal issues, I have scheduled a one hour conference call, half hour each for Roseville and the DC Line to SF. I have indicated who at least I would like involved in each conversation. The rest of you can feel free to listen on the whole thing, or drop off or call in as appropriate. If I have left anyone out of the list, please call me to discuss, as I would like to restrict these discussions to the recipients of the email. (Mark - if you wish Eric or Karen to participate, no problem.) The call in number for both calls will be 800-820-4690 (passcode: 7012645#) 1:00 - 1:30pm: ROSEVILLE "Required" participants Wehn Brodbeck Jones Russeth Govenar(s) ISSUE - Butte county APCD is resisting the transfer of certain ERCs that we own from Butte county to Placer county for our Roseville project. I want to discuss who knows who and which of them we can call to enlist support for our position. For example, Kelly has already petitioned CARB, who have said that this is not right and will pressure them. I will get a letter from the ISO indicating the general economic support our Roseville project will have to the area, including Butte. Dean Russell and Rick Johnson are going to get the support of the Building Trades because of the obvious risk on jobs. I would guess that all of Kelly's new-found farmer friends (sorry, they are called growers out here) can make a few phone calls. I am sure that Scott and Heady can find some political friends in Sacto that we can call. Etc. Please come to the telecon with a list of who you have already contacted, and who we may consider contacting. In the interest of time, I want to set the stage for giving Kelly and Sam some clear guidelines and assignments. Then we can let them do their work and report. And we can get on to the next subject. 1:30 - 2:00 pm: DC LINE TO SF "Required" Participants Palmer Russeth Govenar(s) Etringer Gray Dasovich Rasmussen ISSUE - As we have discussed, we are developing a strategy that, if successful, would result in a transmission line solution to SF's electrical problems. I would like this telecon to be a kick off to discussing/developing a PR and Government relations strategy. Each of you have reviewed my summary email of last week (I have attached a copy for Dasovich and Palmer), so I will not repeat here. It is for the most part self explanatory on issues, status, benefits, etc. Please bring to the telecon your thoughts.
Answer:
Public and government telecon re SF DC line and Roseville ERCs/Butte County issue