In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

[Q]: Comment: Last BC election a perfect case in point.
[A]: Non-sexual-explicit

[Q]: Comment: Being a Jerk is lauded because its a backlash against strangers deciding they get to police what others say, do, and think. its a backlash against americanized westerners complaining about cultural appropriation when white people wear a kimono (cultural japanese aren't bothered by this) and similar behaviors. Its a backlash against being fired and or harassed by those who are so certain they're on the right side of history if you refuse to make use of random nontraditional pronouns (outside of he/she/they and derivatives). A backlash against people who think dragging someone through the social media wringer over a 50's pinup shirt is an appropriate response.

The professor deserves a reprimand and a healthy "what the fuck were you thinking" conversation with their peers. Termination isn't likely to do anything but cost money and instead of a thoughtless act, create an active antagonist to the behaviors the college hopes to instill.
[A]: Non-sexual-explicit

[Q]: Comment: The NFL is not on its own when it comes to labor relations; all business is under some regulations. Additionally, the NFL is a professional association with for-profit ball clubs or whatever they call them. They could even have a tax exempt status if they hadn't given it up for PR reasons. That's important--PR is the lifeblood of the NFL, which is why the NFL is not likely to get nasty with the players and why the players' move makes good sense. Your "ridiculous" assessment is overly simplistic.
[A]:
Non-sexual-explicit