IN: JCharlton@nyiso.com writes to the NYISO_TECH_EXCHANGE Discussion List: Attachment A of the Stage 2 ICAP Manual, as posted, states that on September 28, 2001 the NYISO will inform ICAP Suppliers of the amount of Unforced Capacity they are qualified to offer in the 2001-2002 Winter Capability Period. It also states that LSEs will be notified of the final Unforced Capacity requirements ("UCR") for the upcoming Obligation Procurement Period. Neither statement is correct and a revised Timeline is available for comment. It will be discussed and finalized at the next ICAP Working Group Meeting on October 5. After that October 5 meeting, the updated and corrected Timeline will be posted for approval at the October 25 BIC Meeting. Providing firm final ICAP Supplier UCAP values or LSE UCRs was never feasible in this timeframe. Preliminary LSE UCRs for November were provided to all LSEs on September 21. Final LSE UCRs will be provided on October 9. ICAP Suppliers can estimate their UCAP value based information already supplied. All ICAP Suppliers will have a firm UCAP value for November prior to October 9, if there are no problems with the data submitted and in time to participate in the Monthly Auction to be conducted on October 11. In the meantime, Suppliers can offer as much or as little UCAP for the Winter Capability Period strip auction as they expect to have available, recognizing that their EFORd values will be updated monthly during the Capability Period. Recognize also that there will continue to be Monthly and Deficiency auctions conducted each month during the Capability Period, allowing any Supplier or LSE to clear any long or short postions.

Generate a subject line.

OUT: ICAP Supplier UCAP and LSE UCAP Requirements

IN: Bill, Jr. - I'm so sorry! I should know better by now. Bill, III - You might be more interested in this e-mail than your dad. Kate

Generate a subject line.

OUT: EES - April Deal Discrepancies

IN: Here is the final version. I'll bring copies with me tomorrow to Sacramento and can drop them off at Hedy's office. I meet with Kari Dohn at 10 AM and will be attending the AB 1890 Implementation Group meeting at 1:30. I can drop off copies before I head out for the Dohn meeting. If there's anything else, just let me know. Thanks. Best,

Generate a subject line.

OUT: Final Hertzberg Piece

IN: With respect to this new counterparty for EnronOnline (correct name to follow): Sam Schott advises us that we are limited to 90 characters for a counterparty name in GCP. The correct legal name for this counterparty is longer than 90 characters. I discussed this with Marcus Nettelton, our power lawyer, and if the following scenario meets with the approval of the financial and physical power Confirmation Desks we think the best way to treat this matter is to set the counterparty up in GCP as follows and then add this counterparty to the special handling list so all confirmations, physical and financial, offline and online, go out with the LEGAL NAME, not with the GCP NAME. LEGAL NAME OF COUNTERPARTY: Alliant Energy Corporate Services, Inc., as authorized agent for and on behalf of IES Utilities Inc., Interstate Power Company, and Wisconsin Power and Light Company SUGGESTED NAME FOR GCP: Alliant Energy Corporate Services, Inc., as Agent for three listed utilities Joe and Kim, is this workable for the Confirm Desks? If you can let me and Sam know then Sam can get them set us. Thanks for your help!

Generate a subject line.

OUT:
Alliant Energy Corporate Services, Inc., as Agent