Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.

Example Input: The best part of the ACA is that patients could not be denied for existing conditions. Previously, those patients with seriously expensive conditions were mostly paid through medicare and medicaid paid by the State and the Feds. Under ACA the really expensive patients got their insurance. The only difference is that the entire cost of their coverage is born by other ACA rate payers. 23,000 people, roughly 10% of insured people statewide, are paying the entire costs of our most expensive patients. This is a good bill and should be a priority.
Example Output: No

Example Input: He shot five times to make sure it was dead. It is not like a movie, where someone shoots once, the shootee falls, and the screen darkens. If it ran at him, he may have had to shoot several times to make sure it stopped coming. Sometimes adrenaline can make an animal keep going after it has been shot. Better and more humane to make sure, even if it takes several shots. And in the article, it says he has never used it for self-defense in the 25 years he's been carrying a firearm. So this is not a crazy person shooting all and sundry. Context is important. This is Alaska, people. If there is a danger to a kid, there are enough homesteaders around to fix it if the responsible party won't.
Example Output: No

Example Input: I'd think I'd give that critique a little more time, there Lynn. Don't bait Bill Walker. He will come out swinging like we've never seen.
Example Output:
No