Dear jforney@enron.com, We're writing to confirm your purchase of the following Amazon Marketplace item from finance485@email.msn.com: "Trading for a Living: Psychology, Trading Tactics, Money Management [Hardcover" Amazon.com Payments has charged your credit card (Visa) for this purchase, and the funds have been credited to your Amazon Marketplace seller. On behalf of the seller, finance485@email.msn.com, we thank you for your purchase. The seller has agreed to ship by 11-14-2001. This message serves as advance notification of your shipment--most sellers will NOT send a
Answer: Your Amazon Marketplace Purchase
Here is an email: Here are my initial comments: There's no clear triggering event which would expedite the internal approval process. For instance, paragraph 3 is a current obligation (re landscaping). It would be easier to process this agreement if the effectiveness of this agreement commences when we file for a building permit. I understand that we would have to pay some of this prior to the time the permit is issued, but again, magic words help. Paragraph 6 on right of first refusal for power. Looks like a free call for the next 30 years. Just want to make sure you've bought in on this. Other than the obvious valuation impact, it could impact a purchaser's ability to obtain project financing. Kay
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: Deerfield development agreement
Q: Tana, If at all possible, could you please approve Sabic Americas this morning. I am trying to get this customer an ID by this evening as I will be meeting with him at a conference tommorow. Thanks,
Propose a subject line
A: URGENT Sabic Americas
IN: Further to our conversation please find attached the curves on the JM Huber transaction that we have agreed to work off of. The 30,000/day of capacity will sit on the books until next week but the deal with HUBER is effectively completed. In the event that this deal does not close, then the West desk will resume with the same MTM risks that you presently have. Any curve shift positive from now until the transaction is actually unwound will be credited back to the orig desk and any negative curve shift from here on in will be credited to the trading desk... plus ENA Orig and trading will work on a sharing calculation payable for any future deals. In addition to the transportation income being generated, additional orig will be generated by entering into wellhead and market based transactions with the desks. I believe that all of the risks and discussions associated with the structures have been well communicated with each book ( by Mark Whitt ) and we will be meeting with each of you early next week to get the structures and booking set up properly. I trust that this note covers the general areas related to this deal and I am very pleased with the high level of cooperation shown by everyone.. Pls review file and if there are any questions give me a call. BT

Generate a subject line.

OUT: JM Huber Transaction- Confidential
IN: This is an email
I spoke with Dick Vincent who indicated that we will have no problem obtaining 12 mos renewable business interruption insurance when we go operational on gas. This should solve the warranty issue with the banks because it covers defects, design, and workmanship on the turbines and includes lost profits, etc. Incidentally, for insurance purposes the turbines are designated DE3 which is not a new technology designation. Typically we will always have this coverage in place but if their is a supplier warranty then the party providing the warranty pays ahead of the insurer. In the case where the supplier does not pay or the warranty has ended then the insurer will pay. Now we just need to come up with a fix for the drop dead date. Regards,

What is the subject?

OUT: Warranty
Terrel and I had a conference call with BOC this morning. The call was very positive as they were still interested in talking with us. They had a number of questions regarding the contract terms and seems like they want to sign something by week end. I need clarification on a few issues that they raised. We need to give them answers tommorow. Proposed Contract terms: 1. Houston Zone: 1.95 MW +/- 15% per settlement Interval 2. South Zone: 2.75 MW +/- 10% per settlement Interval 3. North Zone: 15 MW +/- 10% per settlement Interval 4. West Zone: 1.75 MW +/- 10% per settlement Interval ** BOC going to Balancing Energy (+4% charges) outside the band ** 1. Interruptibility - BOC wanted to understand the mechanics. Specifically, they wanted to know how Enron would work with them to maximize curtailment opportunities. They also wanted to know the quantity they could curtail (e.g. If deal is 15 MW +/- 10%, can BOC curtail 16.5 MW, or just 15 MW). Also, do they pay any penalty when they curtail (4%, etc.) 2. Scheduled maintenance - Can they sell contract power a week forward. Is there any penalty for not being within the band during those hours. 3. BOC wants a fixed price quote for all Ancillaries and ERCOT Passthroughs. However they want the ability to unwind this fixed price position should they feel they are better off with ERCOT market prices once the market becomes more transparent. What is Enron's ability to provide such a service? 4. BOC doesnt like the 4% charge in excess of Balancing Energy everytime they are outside the Quantity Band. They said that they dont want to pay more when prices are high and they are outside the band. They want a fixed fee instead of 4% of BES price. Given the bands we have placed in the contract, BOC was outside the band a. 15% of the time in their Houston Zone Interval Load b. 10% of the time in their South Zone Interval Load c. less than 1% of the time in their North Zone Interval Load d. 3% of the time in their South Zone Interval Load Regards
Answer:
BOC Gases Contract