In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

[Q]: Comment: For me, there's something powerfully wrong when the BC Liberal government goes ahead and quietly sells-off publicly owned social housing properties/assets like Nicholson Tower, Sunset Towers, or others, without first holding open public consultations/hearings as part of the democratic process involved in the sale of these publicly owned assets first, and that would include the residents most affected by the damn sale and the neighbourhood where the public properties/assets are located - much like public hearings are held on a municipal property re-zoning application for example. But alas, it seems like our beloved less-than-democratically-open BC Liberal government, deemed this wholly unnecessary. Why!??
[A]: Non-identity-attack

[Q]: Comment: Sullivan, Koch griffin, Evans do we need to say more. Sullivan Figure it out you left us with a huge deficit , unfinished projects and terrible labor relations. You used Ernie Hall to attack labor. You are using Griffin now. You sir are definitely NOT you dad! Take your golden spoon and close mouth around it and please stay out of our business, You had your chance and you blew it.
[A]: Non-identity-attack

[Q]: Comment: So what you are saying is that the only way for these countries to be safe from terrorism is to have no Muslims.
[A]:
Identity-attack