Question: Sentence A: Peace with Spain in 1411 prompted Portugal to seek overseas conquests.

Sentence B: Portugal was convinced that because there was peace in Spain, overseas conquests in 1411 would be a good idea.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Question: It doesn't photograph well.
Pictures of it don't look good.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Problem: Here is a premise:
The choir and chancel do not stand on the island's granite core but on a platform formed by three crypts, with the massive columns of the Crypte des Groseiliers doing most of the work.

Here is a hypothesis:
Nothing ever stands on the island's granite core.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Sentence 1: published about horse fever and keeping the drainfree below the rainspout and putting a little

Sentence 2: Published about horses and proper cleaning methods.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: yes

Question:
It's both or neither.

Does it follow that "It's those two or none at all. "?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
yes

Question:
Based on the premise "'Obviously we have a regulation which is not being followed,' Osag said.", can we conclude that "Osag said the regulation was not being followed."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
yes