In this task, you must classify if a given review is positive/negative, indicating your answer as P or N.

Example input: plot : two teen couples go to a church party , drink and then drive .
they get into an accident .
one of the guys dies , but his girlfriend continues to see him in her life , and has nightmares .
what 's the deal ?
watch the movie and " sorta " find out . . .
critique : a mind - fuck movie for the teen generation that touches on a very cool idea , but presents it in a very bad package .
which is what makes this review an even harder one to write , since i generally applaud films which attempt to break the mold , mess with your head and such ( lost highway & memento ) , but there are good and bad ways of making all types of films , and these folks just did n't snag this one correctly
.
they seem to have taken this pretty neat concept , but executed it terribly .
so what are the problems with the movie ?
well , its main problem is that it 's simply too jumbled
.
it starts off " normal " but then downshifts into this " fantasy " world in which you , as an audience member ,
have no idea what 's going on
.
there are dreams , there are characters coming back from the dead , there are others who look like the dead , there are strange apparitions , there are disappearances , there are a looooot of chase scenes , there are tons of weird things that happen , and most of it is simply not explained .
now i personally do n't mind trying to unravel a film every now and then , but when all it does is give me the same clue over and over again , i get kind of fed up after a while , which is this film 's biggest problem .
it 's obviously got this big secret to hide , but it seems to want to hide it completely until its final five minutes .
and do they make things entertaining , thrilling or even engaging , in the meantime ?
not really .
the sad part is that the arrow and i both dig on flicks like this , so we actually figured most of it out by the half - way point , so all of the strangeness after that did start to make a little bit of sense , but it still did n't the make the film all that more entertaining .
i guess the bottom line with movies like this is that you should always make sure that the audience is " into it " even before they are given the secret password to enter your world of understanding .
i mean , showing melissa sagemiller running away from visions for about 20 minutes throughout the movie is just plain lazy ! !
okay , we get it .
. .
there are people chasing her and we do n't know who they are .
do we really need to see it over and over again ?
how about giving us different scenes offering further insight into all of the strangeness going down in the movie ?
apparently , the studio took this film away from its director and chopped it up themselves , and it shows .
there might 've been a pretty decent teen mind - fuck movie in here somewhere , but i guess " the suits " decided that turning it into a music video with little edge , would make more sense .
the actors are pretty good for the most part , although wes bentley just seemed to be playing the exact same character that he did in american beauty , only in a new neighborhood .
but my biggest kudos go out to sagemiller , who holds her own throughout the entire film , and actually has you feeling her character 's unraveling .
overall , the film does n't stick
because it does n't entertain , it 's confusing , it rarely excites and
it feels pretty redundant for most of its runtime , despite a pretty cool ending and explanation to all of the craziness that came before it .
oh ,
and by the way , this is not a horror or teen slasher flick . . .
it 's just packaged to look that way because someone is apparently assuming that the genre is still hot with the kids .
it also wrapped production two years ago and has been sitting on the shelves ever since .
whatever . .
. skip it !
where 's joblo coming from ?
a nightmare of elm street 3 ( 7/10 ) - blair witch 2 ( 7/10 ) - the crow ( 9/10 ) - the crow : salvation ( 4/10 )
- lost highway ( 10/10 ) - memento ( 10/10 ) - the others ( 9/10 ) - stir of echoes ( 8/10 )
Example output: N
Example explanation: The phrases used in the review convey a negative sentiment (e.g. "presents it in a very bad package").
Q: there are certain people in the world who have some talent that very few people have , but they chose not to take advantage of this for some personal reason .
"
good will hunting " is about one of those people .
the will hunting of the ( horrible ) title ( let 's face it
, this film would be a bitch to title ) , played by co - writer matt damon , is a mathematical genius .
he can do almost any mathematical connundrum in about the time it takes to brew a cup of irish cream cappuccino .
and he works at mit . . .
as the janitor .
one day , the professor of one of the most challenging courses , proffessor lambeau ( " breaking the waves " 's stellan skarsg ?
rd ) , puts a big problem on the board for his students to attempt to complete .
the next day , it 's already done on the board , but no one in his class claims to have done it .
so lambeau puts another problem on the board , this time one that took he and his colleagues over two years to prove .
and , duh , it 's done again .
of course , they catch the guy who did it red handed - will .
before lambeau can find will again ( he ran away when he caught him ) , will has gotten into a fight with a bunch of punks on a basketball court , and struck a police officer , so lambeau gets him out on probation with two agreements : a ) he work with him on math , and b ) he get some therapy .
after going through some therapists whom he psyches out in one way or another ( for a hypnotist , he fakes being under his spell , then launches into an impromptu performance of the 70s classic , " afternoon delight " ) .
finally , lambeau 's old college roomate , sean mcguire ( robin williams ) , a psych professor , agrees to treat him , and the two begin a rocky relationship , as sean tries to get will to open up .
turns out will had a rough childhood , being abandoned , and placed in foster homes and what not .
it also turns out that will does not want to do simple mathematics all his life ; he wants a challenge .
and that is to hang out with his buds ( including the other co - writer , ben affleck ) , and do honorable jobs , like construction .
is it right to make this genius follow in the footsteps of einstein and kasinsky ?
should this guy be forced to do something he does n't want to do ?
this appears to be one of the million questions in this film , which is jam - packed with greatness , but does not have the totally brilliant whole it should .
i 'm not saying " good will hunting " is a bad film at all .
it 's a very enjoyable film with tons of great moments , and lots of great things about it .
the acting is amazing , with two oscar - nomination - worthy performances from damon and williams , who have amazing chemistry together .
we also get some great support from stellan skarsg ?
rd ( great name ) , ben affleck , and from minnie driver , who plays will 's love interest , skylar .
there are tons of individual moments that i adored .
i loved all the comedy in the film , especially a scene where damon proves a schmuck out of a college student who is quoting a historian to impress some chicks , his various attempts at therapy , and of course , my favorite scene in the entire film , the one where he delivers a long , exstensive rant to some nsa agents about the downside of working for them .
i liked the relationship between some of the people , like will and skylar , will and sean , sean and lambeau , and will and his friends .
there are scenes between them which are just amazing to watch .
and there are even moments in the film which are so honest in their portrayal , that i felt rightfully uncomfortable .
like the break - up scene between will and skylar , will and sean 's first meeting , a bar scene between sean and lambeau , and a scene where sean tells in detail how he does n't regret meeting his first wife , who would later suffer a slow , painful death , and leave him lonely and slightly bitter .
however , the main flaw of the film is there 's too much of everything , and not enough of it either .
the film tries for deeper relations between the characters , but they 're sometimes either overwritten or underwritten .
take for example the relationship between sean and will : the film gets an interesting father / son as well as doctor / patient relationship going with out any problems , but when it tries to show them as equals , it falls on its face .
we hear how they went to the same town , and there are even scenes where the film shows how hypocritical both of them are at times .
but this never takes off like the other parts of their relationship do .
also , will 's relationship with his best friend , chuckie ( affleck ) , has a nice climax , but not enough rising action .
we see them joking around , but when chuckie arrives at a decision between the two of them , it seems more like a superficial reasoning than a more selected one .
their relationship never goes beyond " just best friends , " and his decision just seems to be a generalization of any two best friends instead of something more . . .
human .
maybe it was just me .
and it also goes for a parallelism with the relationship between sean and lambeau , but that , again , is underwritten .
and , of course , as in most films like this , the girl / boy relationship is pretty underwritten .
we never understand what they see in each other , so when skylar confesses that she loves him , it seems more like it 's there for plot details that anything else .
minnie driver is interesting , though , and breathes life into her character .
the writing is a bit at fault here , but what makes all this worthwhile is the little moments in the film where it acheives true awesomeness
.
sure , it feels overstuffed , but it 's extremely enjoyable .
the dialogue that affleck and damon have written is amazingly fresh , and seems extremely human .
i think that they should get a nomination for their script chiefly because of the dialogue , which is amazing .
while this is probably director gus van sant 's most conservative film ( you 'd hardly know it 's the same director of " to die for , " the only van sant film i 've seen , really )
, it 's still a pretty remarkable film , albeit a tad overrated ( what 's this " best picture " deal ? ) .
and if a film puts a smile on my face despite posessing a lot of flaws , i have no problem with reccomending it to anyone .
A:
P