Problem: Here is a premise:
Your judgment of the data's importance and the reliability of the source, as well as other engagement factors, can help you determine the extent of such an assessment.

Here is a hypothesis:
Your judgement if the reliability of the data is the only factor to determine the extent of the assessment.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Sentence 1: Since this time, membership has been of great monetary benefit to the country.

Sentence 2: Membership has threatened the country's economy but they can't leave.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: no

Question:
uh well the way i the way i see it is i mean um you know i i can use a Met analogy here

Does it follow that "The Met analogy will say it all. "?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
yes

Q: If yeah yeah it was it was annoying one one half of the starter was you know three bolts on the starter and two of them were American and one of them was metric, can we say that "All three of the bolts were metric."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A: no

Premise:
"I do not understand why he looked at me when he said that."
Hypothesis: He looked at me when he said that, though dropped his gaze soon after.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

it is not possible to tell

Sentence 1: Suffice to say it has no true heat, but does send forth an activating principle against the phlogiston layer, which being excited grows vengeful against the air ...

Sentence 2: It doesn't have any heat, but another property.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer:
yes