TASK DEFINITION: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.
PROBLEM: Comment: Hirono and Schatz would be disappointed with Christ if he ran as a Republican. The Democrats are in serious trouble. They've gone so far out to the extreme, they've completely lost their way. Obstruction is the only thing they think they can do. Voters will not reward them for their obstruction. Folks elected Trump because they were tired of this continued schoolyard bickering in Washington. Under Obama the divisiveness grew to new high levels. Americans are tired of this crap.

SOLUTION: Obscene

PROBLEM: Comment: Only to sneak back in and try it again. One bad hombre.

SOLUTION: Non-obscene

PROBLEM: Comment: The author negates his own argument in his own article: "this disheartening incident is distinct from the acceptance, tolerance and understanding that my home province normally greets me with."

So by his own admission, the typical interactions he has with his fellow citizens in NL is acceptance, tolerance and understanding. He has one "distinct" negative experience and he questions the civility and nature of Canada and Canadians at large...

I hate to pile-on here (especially with some the more vitriolic comments below) but this pathetic and sad and distracts from real issues of racism and discrimination.

SOLUTION:
Non-obscene