In this task, you are given books product reviews in English language. The goal is to classify the review as "POS" if the overall sentiment of the review is positive or as "NEG" if the overall sentiment of the review is negative.

Example Input: strong family drama . In England though she recently broke up with her boyfriend, seventeen-year-old Charlotte feels good about herself and her future as she is doing well in school, lives in a relatively happy all female home, and seems adjusted. That is until she learns she is pregnant. Her mom Karen is a teacher's aide struggling with her mother Nan's mind slowly slipping away with the demands from that side already overwhelming. Her patience is over the edge when Charlotte informs her she is pregnant. Upset and unable to contain her anger, Karen cannot believe that history has repeated itself because when she was sixteen she gave birth to Karen. Though she loves her daughter all her dreams died with her birth. She did marry the father but thankfully divorced that loser soon afterward. As Nan drifts deeper into the past including insisting that she adopted Karen, the mentally exhausted sandwich generation is not sure what to do as Charlotte decides to give birth except to flee in search of her biological mother dreaming of a loving comforting welcome. This fascinating character study is at its best when the audience sees deep inside the three generations with deep understanding of being an unwed mother, a child having a child, the sandwich generation, and the creeping of dementia (as well as a late stroke). When the tale spins off into the biological mother twist it loses some of its depth until Karen returns to her "real" family. Somewhat a soap opera, THE BAD MOTHER'S HANDBOOK is a strong family drama that focuses on the demands and responsibilities on women without men. Harriet Klausner
Example Output: POS

Example Input: Athena and Kain: The True Meaning of Greek Myth . The preface to ATHENA and KAIN states that the content of the book is revolutionary, and it really is. I looked up revolutionary, and in the context used it means, "a total or radical change, as a revolution of thought." There is no other book on Greek art or myth like ATHENA and KAIN. Mr. Johnson points out that Greek sculptures appeared on public temples and other public buildings, and that mythological scenes appeared on the ancient Greeks' everyday pottery and storage jars. The average Greeks understood the meaning of their myths. Because of ATHENA and KAIN, it is now possible for us to understand them, too
Example Output: POS

Example Input: historical truth? . I'm interested by all the reviewers who claim this book is a good one despite the racist stereotypes of "savage" natives because, they say, it's "the truth." The review before mine is especially interesting; he proclaims to love the book and reads it to his children as it teaches about defending your home against terrorism. Reviewers like myself are just spewing "liberal diatribe." Another reviewer asks "as for the savages, who was attacking who?" Everyone thinks of the scenario of little Edward and his innocent family just living their lives until these terrible Indians come along and want to wipe them out. In the interest of historical truth, would you look at it another way? Think of your home and neighborhood. You may have lived there for years, or you may have just moved from a neighboring town. You participate in community activities, your children are educated with your neighbors children, you attend religious services. Then one day, a group of foreign soldiers come into your neighborhood, and say it now belongs to them. As Americans, how would you feel if a group of Italian, English, Russian, French, etc., soldiers did this? They claim the neighborhood in the name of their government and demand that you leave your home and go elsewhere. Pretend no telephones, telegraph, or internet exist. You go to your government and tell them about the soldiers, but they have no way of notifying the foriegn soldiers government that this land is already settled. Your government sends an army to eject the soldiers, but is defeated. Eventually you have to leave. The soldiers keep coming, and it's not long before families from the soldiers land come as well. They keep expanding further and further, and forcing you and your family to keep moving, killing many of your family and friends. Eventually all of you have had enough of this treatment - instead of fighting only their soldiers, your leaders get small citizen's armies together to attack their settlements as they have yours. Now, who is the terrorist in this case? If you want your children to know the historical truth, you should tell them the whole truth. Comparing the original inhabitants of North and South America to the 9-11 terrorists is not accurate. Comparing the european invaders - let me see, they killed the natives who wanted to keep the land they'd lived on for centuries, and forcibly converted them to european religions, as the native religions were "heathen." If you believe everything I've written is just "liberal diatribe," go on happily reading this book to your kids, with no true historical references. I'm just a mixed-blood savage, so of course what I think won't count with you.
Example Output:
NEG