In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

[EX Q]: Comment: What kind of question is that. Social Security and Medicare and Obamacare are a waste of money when more nukes could be produced to age away into oblivion in missile silos. I'm sure poor and middle class Americans will appreciate how safe they are as they die in their beds at home from lack of health care and any money for treatment.

Meanwhile, KellyAnne Reifenstahl will keep coming up with propaganda ploys to feed to the surrogates so they can go on the news channels and holler them out over any challenges from moderators. Once they say it, no matter how outrageous a lie, they will smile as once they have vomited the latest BS, they will know the followers have heard them, and the followers will attack the moderators for not agreeing, labelling them the "lying mainstream media". Worked like a hot damn during the election.

Donnie ain't going nowhere. It's the US that is about to be changed significantly, to the detriment of democracy.
[EX A]: Non-identity-attack

[EX Q]: Comment: Could all this critical talk of him be racially motivated?
The well mannered Senator (Meridith) is being forced out because he was black and the female was a young white girl. Is that racially motivated?
Start the spin process as of now!
[EX A]: Identity-attack

[EX Q]: Comment: That's exactly what's wrong with this way of thinking. It's not unlike what is going on Russia where people think all homosexuals are pedophiles.

Sexuality is a spectrum and it doesn't always have to do with sexual ACTIVITY. The fact that you immediately equate transgender people with being perverted and predatory shows your ignorance. It's insulting, and low.

This isn't a debate about wether or not we should allow sexual predators into bathrooms, it's about accepting that some people actually ARE transgender and have the right to live a lifestyle that matches their sexual identity. This is a debate about the government not having the right to look down people's pants and decide where they belong. It's about individual freedom and civil liberty.

Your boys don't sound transgender, and children of the same gender are just as capable of any sort of sexual assault. Your logic would state every child should have an individual bathroom if that's your concern.
[EX A]:
Identity-attack