To sit down in muddy water does not imply a future need for washing clothes.. So what could be the question?
Question followed by answer: Premise: "The little kid sits down in the muddy water."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "The kid's clothes are going to need a good washing afterwards." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
it is not possible to tell
Six men looking in a cement hole in the ground does not infer they were hiding a dead body.
The question and answer are below.
Premise: "Six men are looking at a cement hole in the ground and talking next to a backhoe."
Hypothesis: "The six men were hiding a dead body."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
it is not possible to tell
Looking at a city doesn't imply they like the city lit up at night.
The question and answer are below.
Premise: "Sightseers look across the water at a city."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "The sightseers like the way the city looks lit up at night." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
it is not possible to tell
There is a man sitting on the stool reading the newspaper.. So what could be the question?
Question followed by answer: Given the sentence "A man sits on a stool reading the newspaper among a bunch of debris." can we conclude that "The man on the stool read the newspaper."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
yes
A woman talking to two men outside is not necessarily yelling at two men.
The question and answer are below.
Can we conclude from "A woman is talking to two men outside." that "A woman yelling at two men."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
it is not possible to tell
If he could jump a gate then he would not need to be learning how to ski.
The question and answer are below.
Premise: "A snowboarder wearing a green jacket jumps above a low gate."
Hypothesis: "A snowboarder is learning to ski."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
no