In this task, you are given text for US Congressional and California state bills, your task is to generate a summary for this bill.
Example: SECTION 1. LIABILITY OF BUSINESS ENTITIES PROVIDING USE OF FACILITIES
TO NONPROFIT ORGANIZATIONS.

(a) Definitions.--In this section:
(1) Business entity.--The term ''business entity'' means a
firm, corporation, association, partnership, consortium, joint
venture, or other form of enterprise.
(2) Facility.--The term ''facility'' means any real
property, including any building, improvement, or appurtenance.
(3) Gross negligence.--The term ''gross negligence'' means
voluntary and conscious conduct by a person with knowledge (at
the time of the conduct) that the conduct is likely to be
harmful to the health or well-being of another person.
(4) Intentional misconduct.--The term ''intentional
misconduct'' means conduct by a person with knowledge (at the
time of the conduct) that the conduct is harmful to the health
or well-being of another person.
(5) Nonprofit organization.--The term ''nonprofit
organization'' means--
(A) any organization described in section 501(c)(3)
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and exempt from
tax under section 501(a) of such Code; or
(B) any not-for-profit organization organized and
conducted for public benefit and operated primarily for
charitable, civic, educational, religious, welfare, or
health purposes.
(6) State.--The term ''State'' means each of the several
States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto
Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, the Northern
Mariana Islands, any other territory or possession of the
United States, or any political subdivision of any such State,
territory, or possession.
(b) Limitation on Liability.--
(1) In general.--Subject to subsection (c), a business
entity shall not be subject to civil liability relating to any
injury or death occurring at a facility of the business entity
in connection with a use of such facility by a nonprofit
organization if--
(A) the use occurs outside of the scope of business
of the business entity;
(B) such injury or death occurs during a period
that such facility is used by the nonprofit
organization; and
(C) the business entity authorized the use of such
facility by the nonprofit organization.
(2) Application.--This subsection shall apply--
(A) with respect to civil liability under Federal
and State law; and
(B) regardless of whether a nonprofit organization
pays for the use of a facility.
(c) Exception for Liability.--Subsection (b) shall not apply to an
injury or death that results from an act or omission of a business
entity that constitutes gross negligence or intentional misconduct,
including any misconduct that--
(1) constitutes a crime of violence (as that term is
defined in section 16 of title 18, United States Code) or act
of international terrorism (as that term is defined in section
2331 of title 18) for which the defendant has been convicted in
any court;
(2) constitutes a hate crime (as that term is used in the
Hate Crime Statistics Act (28 U.S.C. 534 note));
(3) involves a sexual offense, as defined by applicable
State law, for which the defendant has been convicted in any
court; or
(4) involves misconduct for which the defendant has been
found to have violated a Federal or State civil rights law.
(d) Superseding Provision.--
(1) In general.--Subject to paragraph (2) and subsection
(e), this Act preempts the laws of any State to the extent that
such laws are inconsistent with this Act, except that this Act
shall not preempt any State law that provides additional
protection from liability for a business entity for an injury
or death with respect to which conditions under subparagraphs
(A) through (C) of subsection (b)(1) apply.
(2) Limitation.--Nothing in this Act shall be construed to
supersede any Federal or State health or safety law.
(e) Election of State Regarding Nonapplicability.--This Act shall
not apply to any civil action in a State court against a business
entity in which all parties are citizens of the State if such State
enacts a statute--
(1) citing the authority of this subsection;
(2) declaring the election of such State that this Act
shall not apply to such civil action in the State; and
(3) containing no other provision.
Example solution: Shields a business entity from civil liability relating to any injury or death occurring at a facility of that entity in connection with a use of such facility by a nonprofit organization if: (1) the use occurs outside the scope of business of the business entity; (2) such injury or death occurs during a period that such facility is used by such organization; and (3) the business entity authorized the use of such facility by the organization.
Makes this Act inapplicable to an injury or death that results from an act or omission of a business entity that constitutes gross negligence or intentional misconduct, including misconduct that: (1) constitutes a hate crime or a crime of violence or act of international terrorism for which the defendant has been convicted in any court; or (2) involves a sexual offense for which the defendant has been convicted in any court or misconduct for which the defendant has been found to have violated a Federal or State civil rights law.
Preempts State laws to the extent that such laws are inconsistent with this Act, except State law that provides additional protection from liability. Specifies that this Act shall not be construed to supersede any Federal or State health or safety law.
Makes this Act inapplicable to any civil action in a State court against a business entity in which all parties are citizens of the State if such State, citing this Act's authority and containing no other provision, enacts a statute declaring the State's election that this Act shall not apply to such action in the State.
Example explanation: This Bill focuses on shielding business entities from civil liability relating to an injury or death depending on the conditions of injury, hence the generated summary is correct.

Problem: SECTION 1. NORTHERN CHEYENNE INDIAN RESERVED WATER RIGHTS SETTLEMENT
ACT OF 1992.

(a) Environmental Costs._Section 7 of the Northern Cheyenne Indian
Reserved Water Rights Settlement Act of 1992 (Public Law 102-374, 106
Stat. 1186 et seq.) is amended by adding the following new subsections
(f) and (g) and redesignating the succeeding subsections accordingly:
''(f) Environmental Costs._All costs associated with the Tongue
River Dam Project for environmental compliance mandated by Federal law
and fish and wildlife mitigation measures adopted by the Secretary are
the sole responsibility of the United States. Funds for such compliance
shall be appropriated pursuant to the authorization in subsection (e),
and shall be in addition to funds appropriated pursuant to section
7(b)(1) of the Act. The Secretary is authorized to expend not to exceed
$625,000 of funds appropriated pursuant to subsection (e) for fish and
wildlife mitigation costs associated with Tongue River Dam construction
authorized by the Act, and shall be in addition to funds appropriated
pursuant to section 7(b)(1) of the Act.
''(g) Reimbursement to State._The Secretary shall reimburse Montana
for expenditures for environmental compliance activities, conducted on
behalf of the United States prior to enactment of this subsection (g),
which the Secretary determines to have been properly conducted and
necessary for completion of the Tongue River Dam Project. Subsequent to
enactment of this subsection (g), the Secretary may not reimburse
Montana for any such environmental compliance activities undertaken
without the Secretary's prior approval.''.
(b) Authorizations._The first sentence of section 4(c) of the
Northern Cheyenne Indian Reserved Water Rights Settlement Act of 1992
(Public Law 102-374; 106 Stat. 1186 et seq.) is amended to read as
follows: ''Except for authorizations contained in subsections
7(b)(1)(A), 7(b)(1)(B), and the authorization for environmental
compliance activities for the Tongue River Dam Project contained in
subsection 7(e), the authorization of appropriations contained in this
Act shall not be effective until such time as the Montana water court
enters and approves a decree as provided in subsection (d) of this
section.''.
(c) Effective Date._The amendments made by this section shall be
considered to have taken effect on September 30, 1992.

SEC. 2. SAN CARLOS APACHE TRIBE WATER RIGHTS SETTLEMENT ACT OF 1992.

(a) Amendment._Section 3704(d) of the San Carlos Apache Tribe Water
Rights Settlement Act of 1992 (Public Law 102-575) is amended by
deleting ''reimbursable'' and inserting in lieu thereof
''nonreimbursable''.
(b) Effective Date._The amendment made by subsection (a) shall be
considered to have taken effect on October 30, 1992.

SEC. 3. TRIBALLY CONTROLLED COMMUNITY COLLEGES.

The part of the text contained under the heading ''BUREAU OF INDIAN
AFFAIRS'', and the subheading ''operation of indian programs'', in
title I of the Department of the Interior and Related Agencies
Appropriations Act, 1994, which reads ''Provided further, That any
funds provided under this head or previously provided for tribally-
controlled community colleges which are distributed prior to September
30, 1994 which have been or are being invested or administered in
compliance with section 331 of the Higher Education Act shall be deemed
to be in compliance for current and future purposes with title III of
the Tribally Controlled Community Colleges Assistance Act.'' is amended
by deleting ''section 331 of the Higher Education Act'' and inserting
in lieu thereof ''section 332(c)(2)(A) of the Higher Education Act of
1965''.

SEC. 4. WHITE EARTH RESERVATION LAND SETTLEMENT ACT OF 1985.

Section 7 of the White Earth Reservation Land Settlement Act of
1985 (25 U.S.C. 331, note) is amended by adding at the end thereof the
following:
''(f)(1) The Secretary is authorized to make a one-time deletion
from the second list published under subsection (c) or any subsequent
list published under subsection (e) of any allotments or interests
which the Secretary has determined do not fall within the provisions of
subsection (a) or (b) of section 4, or subsection (c) of section 5, or
which the Secretary has determined were erroneously included in such
list by reason of misdescription or typographical error.
''(2) The Secretary shall publish in the Federal Register notice of
deletions made from the second list published under subsection (c) or
any subsequent list published under subsection (e).
''(3) The determination made by the Secretary to delete an
allotment or interest under paragraph (1) may be judicially reviewed in
accordance with chapter 7 of title 5, United States Code, within 90
days after the date on which notice of such determination is published
in the Federal Register under paragraph (2). Any legal action
challenging such a determination that is not filed within such 90-day
period shall be forever barred. Exclusive jurisdiction over any legal
action challenging such a determination is vested in the United States
District Court for the District of Minnesota.''.

SEC. 5. AMENDMENTS.

(a) Section 1(c) of the Act entitled ''An Act to establish a
reservation for the Confederated Tribes of the Grand Ronde Community of
Oregon, and for other purposes'', approved September 9, 1988 (102 Stat.
1594), is amended as follows:
(1) delete ''9,811.32'' and insert in lieu thereof
''9,879.65''; and
(2) delete everything after ''5 8 17 All 640.00'' and insert
in lieu thereof the following:

''6 8 1 SW/4\SW/4\,W/2 53.78
\SE/4\SW/4\
''6 8 1 S/2\E/2\,SE/4\ 9.00
SW/4\
''6 7 8 Tax lot 800 5.55
------------
Total......... 9,879.65''.

(b) Section 16 of the Act of June 18, 1934 (25 U.S.C. 476) is
amended by adding at the end of the following new subsections:
''(f) Privileges and Immunities of Indian Tribes; Prohibition on
New Regulations._Departments or agencies of the United States shall not
promulgate any regulation or make any decision or determination
pursuant to the Act of June 18, 1934 (25 U.S.C. 461 et seq., 48 Stat.
984) as amended, or any other Act of Congress, with respect to a
federally recognized Indian tribe that classifies, enhances, or
diminishes the privileges and immunities available to the Indian tribe
relative to other federally recognized tribes by virtue of their status
as Indian tribes.
''(g) Privileges and Immunities of Indian Tribes; Existing
Regulations._Any regulation or administrative decision or determination
of a department or agency of the United States that is in existence or
effect on the date of enactment of this Act and that classifies,
enhances, or diminishes the privileges and immunities available to a
federally recognized Indian tribe relative to the privileges and
immunities available to other federally recognized tribes by virtue of
their status as Indian tribes shall have no force or effect.''.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and
President of the Senate.
Solution: Amends the Northern Cheyenne Indian Reserve Water Rights Settlement Act of 1992 to state that: (1) all environmental costs associated with the Tongue River Dam Project (Project) mandated by Federal law and fish and wildlife measures are the sole responsibility of the United States; (2) such funds (limited to $625,000) shall be in addition to Project funds provided for by such Act; (3) the Secretary of the Interior shall reimburse Montana for certain Project environmental compliance costs incurred prior to enactment of this Act (costs incurred subsequent to enactment reimbursable only with prior approval); and (4) authorization of appropriations, with specified exceptions, shall not be effective until the Montana water court enters and approves a settlement decree.
Amends the San Carlos Apache Tribe Water Rights Settlement Act of 1992 to change "reimbursable" to "nonreimbursable" with respect to certain Central Arizona Water Conservation District water costs.
Makes a technical correction to the Department of the Interior and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 1994.
Amends the White Earth Reservation Land Settlement Act of 1985 to permit a one-time deletion of certain erroneous land parcel determinations printed in the Federal Register. Provides a limited time in which to challenge such determinations.
Prohibits new regulations and gives no effect to existing regulations that classify, enhance, or diminish the privileges and immunities of a federally recognized Indian tribe relative to other such tribes.