In this task, you are given product reviews about dvds. The goal is to classify the review as "POS" if the overall sentiment of the review is positive(the reviewer is satisfied) or as "NEG" if the overall sentiment of the review is negative(the reviewer is not satisfied).

[Q]: Alexander and the Terrible, Horrible, No Good, Very Bad Movie . I apologize the the children's author for mis-using the title of a very good book, but it seemed so right! Assuming that the Greeks lived much like the Oliver Stone asserts, and why not, then it was hard to be Macedonian, Greek, and royal. There is enough angst in this movie for the rest of Alexander's cut short life. Three hours of this much angst is three hours too much. I give it 2 stars for the scenery, the story that is probably pretty spot on, and the fact that someone had the good sense to have Sir Anthony Hopkins and Christpher Plummer in the movie. They are the redeeming features of the whole thing. But I would not recommend this movie to anyone looking for a more historical venue. Read a good book about it!! Sorry, Oliver, but it's JFK all over again. Plausible, but just not the case
[A]: NEG

[Q]: Happy Birthday Mom . Okay, let me explain the title. I call this review Happy Birthday Mom because in the middle of the movie i stopped the movie to call my mom and wish her a happy birthday. The typical thought would be that I bought this dvd for my mother as a birthday gift, but I do like my mom, so I wouldn't do that to her. Later in the movie I also stopped it to talk to my friend that lives in Canada. Yeah, I stopped it to talk to a CANADIAN, thats bad.... Well he's just up there for school, so ya know. Some of it was good, but it could have done better. I have the seemingly harder to come by skill of seperating fiction (movie, game, tv) from real life, so I like the kind of shat that upsets fragile people without that skill. I'm sure some of the violence in this movie made someone cry foul.... And its gets and extra half star simply because Kari Wuhrer is hot in this movie, like every movie she's in!
[A]: NEG

[Q]: Now a longer version of a movie that was too long? . OK, the original is a classic and is what...90...100 minutes long? Jackson stretches it out to 3 hours and adds very little to the story. The native were scary. The quiet scenes with Kong were welcome additions, they actually made him into a character...something that can't be said for any of the human characters. The insect scenes are ridiculous!! The dinosaur stampede was idiotic. Anything with the young cabin boy almost seemed like it was clipped out of another movie. Now Jackson is adding 38 munutes to a movie that is grossly over padded to begin with?!? Peter Jackson is a hack director that has no idea how to tell a story efficiently.Remind me to skip his next 15 3 hour long epics
[A]:
NEG