What was the question for this implicit rationale, and corresponding answer?
One can not sit beside balloons if one has popped said balloons.
The answer: no
The question: Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "A man wearing a green shirt with suspenders sits on a bench beside a large bouquet of metallic helium balloons."
Hypothesis: "The man has popped the balloons and is laughing manically."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell