Premise:
"have you okay oh oh that's neat"
Hypothesis: That's awful.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

no

input question: Yale law professor and quirky constitutional historian Bruce Ackerman, testifying before the House of Representatives in December, argued that a newly elected Congress has little authority to try an official who was impeached by the previous one. If this premise is true, does that tell us:"Bruce Ackerman testified before the House of Representatives due to his expertise on the topic of law."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: yes

Question:
Based on the premise "White Paper for Review by the EPA Science Advisory Board.", can we conclude that "White Paper for the EPA Science Advisory Board to Review."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
it is not possible to tell

Question: Sentence A: Their influence waned, and they began to be absorbed into the general population.

Sentence B: Their influence disappeared and they just went to live in the city.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question: Give us some content-rich brainfood stereophonically fed through the audio ports while our lower cortex is busy arranging electrons on the screen.
Our lower cortex is used for doing math.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Problem: Here is a premise:
Their arcades, fluted pillars, and mosaic tiles are teetering on last legs, praying for restoration miracles.

Here is a hypothesis:
Their arcades, fluted pillars, and mosaic tiles are teetering on last legs, praying for restoration miracles because of years of neglect.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer:
it is not possible to tell