Articles 4653 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties set out the only ways that treaties can be invalidatedconsidered unenforceable and void under international law. A treaty will be invalidated due to either the circumstances by which a state party joined the treaty, or due to the content of the treaty itself. Invalidation is separate from withdrawal, suspension, or termination (addressed above), which all involve an alteration in the consent of the parties of a previously valid treaty rather than the invalidation of that consent in the first place.
Is there an answer to this question (If it cannot be answered, say "unanswerable"): A treaty might be considered what if it's considered unenforceable and void under international law?
invalidated