instruction:
Categorize the comment on the basis of severe toxicity. If the comment is severely toxic output Yes, otherwise output No.
question:
that would be the ignorant deluded hypocrites of America. Glad I could clear that up for ya. the dems did make obstructionist their #1 priority, Tip O'Neal made it clear Reagan was DOA. facts always confuse people like you.
answer:
Yes

question:
Seriously, Reg Guard? You're going to name names and the trauma that will inflict on the individual? Especially when the dude's name ain't available?

What's next, scarlette lettering? Have some $%@%ing class and mercy. I took a journalism ethics class in college. You don't gain clicks by naming the person. You just do harm.

Screw you, Chelsea Gorrow. I don't know the young lady involved here, so YOURS is the name that I'll remember after this. You could have made the other choice rather than trying to fucking scar some poor 18 year old. It's a funny story without the name.
answer:
Yes

question:
Most people who are fixated on how you have "sex" with another female your "wife" Suzy are the religious nuts. When I see a couple hetro or gay the last thing I would ever image in my mind is how they do the deed. I find that gay couples now legally can be welcomed into marriage by law but they get stuck with the same things that the hetro couples take for granted such as fighting, infidelity, domestic violence and divorce court. The gays fought a heard battle to have the same rights as hetros, but in reality they get all the crap that comes with the "sacred" institution of marriage that comes with it and some want to take that away from them? LOL
answer:
Yes