You will be given a context and a verb separated with a newline character, and you have to answer if the given verb can be anchored in time or not. We say a verb can be anchored in the real timeline if and only if a verb happened in the past, is happening now, or is guaranteed to happen in the future. The output should be "Yes" if the verb can be anchored in time and "No" otherwise.

[EX Q]: It is undergoing testing at the FBI laboratory in Washington, but the authorities have said it resembles the kind of high-powered rifle used in the slaying. Clark said other evidence that prosecutors might present includes a strand of human hair found at the wooded firing site that has a high likelihood of (matching) Kopp's hair and testimony from a jogger who spotted Kopp's car near Slepian's house at 6 a.m. ten days before the shooting.
Verb: matching
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: Earlier, they had said they would give the boy to Gonzalez if he made the trip. Before his Sunday night address, Castro played the affectionate grandfather to the 12 first-graders proposed to go on the trip, assuring them that their planned trip to Washington to (retrieve) their little friend was a very important mission.
Verb: retrieve
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: For now, though, that would be a theoretical advantage since the authorities have admitted they have no idea where Kopp is. Clark said there was no question that the finding of the rifle (was) important in his decision to seek an indictment.
Verb: was
[EX A]:
No