Question:
Based on the premise "As long as you're positing an evolutionary urge with no present-day benefits, why assume the most complicated explanation is correct?", can we conclude that "A evolutionary urge is being assumed as the reason."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
yes

Question: Sentence A: It's much noted that if you saw what goes on in a restaurant kitchen, you'd never eat out again.

Sentence B: The majority of restaurant kitchens have poor levels of hygiene.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question: If this goes well, you shall come in on the ground floor." With which promise she took leave of her new ally, and walked briskly away from South Audley Mansions, well pleased with her morning's work.
After extracting a promise, she left the house, happy with her efforts.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Problem: Here is a premise:
He goes behind the wrestled solemnities of the poetry to reveal the effort, the strategizing, and the silliness.

Here is a hypothesis:
He hides the silliness of the poetry.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Sentence 1: Collecting and processing the crop is still a profitable industry.

Sentence 2: Collecting and processing the crop has always been a reliable way to earn money.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Premise:
"i think so yeah yeah but you know alcohol destroys you know so many families so now"
Hypothesis: I want to stop drinking.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
it is not possible to tell