In this task, you need to write an incorrect answer to the given question. Along with the question, you are also given the correct answer(s) and the associated paragraph. An incorrect answer should be closely related to the content of the paragraph and/or the question but will not truthfully answer the question. Your incorrect answers should be similar to the given correct answer such that it will pose a challenge for students to distinguish the two. A good incorrect answer should prevent those who skip the paragraph from answering the question. The incorrect answer should not be trivial, in the sense that they should not be easily eliminated without reading the paragraph.
--------
Question: Paragraph- Sent 1: But I think it is certain that most of the early Christians understood these words of our Lord's ascension and coming again in glory.
Sent 2: They believed that He was coming again in a very little while during their own life-time, in a few months or years, to make an end of the world and to judge the quick and the dead.
Sent 3: And as they waited for His coming, one generation after another, and yet He did not come, a sadness fell upon them.
Sent 4: Christ seemed to have left the world.
Sent 5: The little while that He had promised to be away seemed to have become a very long while.
Sent 6: Hundreds of years passed, and yet Christ did not come in glory.
Sent 7: And, as I said, a sadness fell on all the Church.
Sent 8: Surely, they said, this is the time of which Christ said we were to weep and lament till we saw Him again--this is the time of which He said that the bridegroom should be taken from us, and we should fast in those days.
Sent 9: And they did fast, and weep, and lament; and their religion became a very sad and melancholy one--most sad in those who were most holy, and loved their Lord best, and longed most for His coming in glory.
Question: Who had been waiting for hundreds of years after the Lord's ascension?.

Answer: Early Hindus.

Question: Paragraph- Sent 1: Her career started more than 20 years ago in a garage behind a Catholic Worker soup kitchen on skid row in Los Angeles.
Sent 2: She lived on a $3-a-week stipend that she spent on pantyhose and bus fare.
Sent 3: Her law practice grew to an organization that brought in millions of dollars of damages through its cases against L.A. slumlords, allowing poor families to set up college funds and buy homes.
Sent 4: In all those years, she never lost a case.
Sent 5: When she stepped down, she had time to notice what was happening to the field of poverty law.
Sent 6: "I realized with a shock that the work had really disintegrated and we had lost a whole generation of public-interest lawyers," she said.
Sent 7: "It had gone from being an economic sacrifice as it was in my day to an economic impossibility.
Sent 8: ... The whole system has essentially collapsed."Sent 9: Mintie also started to ask questions about the medical field.
Sent 10: Almost every person who walks into a free medical clinic, she said, faces some legal problem such as an eviction or the loss of Social Security benefits.
Sent 11: And many of her clients had medical problems from living in slum housing such as cockroaches lodged in ear canals and rat bite fever, a nonfatal malady that particularly affects children.
Sent 12: Mintie noticed that health-care professionals were graduating with staggering debts and also couldn't afford to work with the poor.
Sent 13: Her work was noticed by Oprah Winfrey, who invited her on the TV show March 26, 2001.
Sent 14: Mintie received a $100,000 "Use Your Life Award" from Oprah's Angel Network, a nonprofit organization that awards money to those who help others.
Sent 15: Mintie said that all of the money has gone to her recipients -- none was spent on overhead.
Sent 16: She will be out of funds by spring.
Sent 17: She is trying to get religious organizations to sponsor recipients.
Sent 18: It is a secular organization, but one that grew out of Mintie's religious convictions.
Question: What career did Mintie start 20 years ago in Los Angeles?.

Answer: Painting.

Question: Paragraph- Sent 1: Sometimes traits can vary from parent to offspring.
Sent 2: These changes are due to mutations.
Sent 3: Mutations are a random change.
Sent 4: Mutations are natural.
Sent 5: Some mutations are harmful.
Sent 6: In this case, the organism may not live to reproduce.
Sent 7: The trait will not be passed onto offspring.
Sent 8: Others variations in traits have no effect on survival.
Sent 9: Can some mutations be good for a living thing?
Sent 10: Other mutations can have great benefits.
Sent 11: Imagine being the first moth that can blend into its background.
Sent 12: It would have a better chance of survival.
Sent 13: A living thing that survives is likely to have offspring.
Sent 14: If it does, it may pass the new trait on to its offspring.
Sent 15: Thats good news for the offspring.
Sent 16: The offspring may be more likely to survive.
Sent 17: Mutations are one way living things adapt to new conditions.
Question: Are mutations always harmful?.

Answer:
Yes.