Detailed Instructions: In this task, you must classify if a given review is positive/negative, indicating your answer as P or N.
See one example below:
Problem: plot : two teen couples go to a church party , drink and then drive .
they get into an accident .
one of the guys dies , but his girlfriend continues to see him in her life , and has nightmares .
what 's the deal ?
watch the movie and " sorta " find out . . .
critique : a mind - fuck movie for the teen generation that touches on a very cool idea , but presents it in a very bad package .
which is what makes this review an even harder one to write , since i generally applaud films which attempt to break the mold , mess with your head and such ( lost highway & memento ) , but there are good and bad ways of making all types of films , and these folks just did n't snag this one correctly
.
they seem to have taken this pretty neat concept , but executed it terribly .
so what are the problems with the movie ?
well , its main problem is that it 's simply too jumbled
.
it starts off " normal " but then downshifts into this " fantasy " world in which you , as an audience member ,
have no idea what 's going on
.
there are dreams , there are characters coming back from the dead , there are others who look like the dead , there are strange apparitions , there are disappearances , there are a looooot of chase scenes , there are tons of weird things that happen , and most of it is simply not explained .
now i personally do n't mind trying to unravel a film every now and then , but when all it does is give me the same clue over and over again , i get kind of fed up after a while , which is this film 's biggest problem .
it 's obviously got this big secret to hide , but it seems to want to hide it completely until its final five minutes .
and do they make things entertaining , thrilling or even engaging , in the meantime ?
not really .
the sad part is that the arrow and i both dig on flicks like this , so we actually figured most of it out by the half - way point , so all of the strangeness after that did start to make a little bit of sense , but it still did n't the make the film all that more entertaining .
i guess the bottom line with movies like this is that you should always make sure that the audience is " into it " even before they are given the secret password to enter your world of understanding .
i mean , showing melissa sagemiller running away from visions for about 20 minutes throughout the movie is just plain lazy ! !
okay , we get it .
. .
there are people chasing her and we do n't know who they are .
do we really need to see it over and over again ?
how about giving us different scenes offering further insight into all of the strangeness going down in the movie ?
apparently , the studio took this film away from its director and chopped it up themselves , and it shows .
there might 've been a pretty decent teen mind - fuck movie in here somewhere , but i guess " the suits " decided that turning it into a music video with little edge , would make more sense .
the actors are pretty good for the most part , although wes bentley just seemed to be playing the exact same character that he did in american beauty , only in a new neighborhood .
but my biggest kudos go out to sagemiller , who holds her own throughout the entire film , and actually has you feeling her character 's unraveling .
overall , the film does n't stick
because it does n't entertain , it 's confusing , it rarely excites and
it feels pretty redundant for most of its runtime , despite a pretty cool ending and explanation to all of the craziness that came before it .
oh ,
and by the way , this is not a horror or teen slasher flick . . .
it 's just packaged to look that way because someone is apparently assuming that the genre is still hot with the kids .
it also wrapped production two years ago and has been sitting on the shelves ever since .
whatever . .
. skip it !
where 's joblo coming from ?
a nightmare of elm street 3 ( 7/10 ) - blair witch 2 ( 7/10 ) - the crow ( 9/10 ) - the crow : salvation ( 4/10 )
- lost highway ( 10/10 ) - memento ( 10/10 ) - the others ( 9/10 ) - stir of echoes ( 8/10 )
Solution: N
Explanation: The phrases used in the review convey a negative sentiment (e.g. "presents it in a very bad package").

Problem: some movies ' pre - release buzz is so insistent on their high oscar potential that when they 're finally released , everyone just goes along with it .
thus sometimes , films unworthy of any award sans
the razzie become oscar hopefuls and some even score nominations .
last year it was the thin red line .
this year 's " winner " is the hurricane ,
pure unadulterated tripe
that is all of a sudden being received with critical plaudits and votes in the office oscar pool .
acclaimed director norman jewison 's biopic retreads all the conventions of courtroom movies
without any of the fun .
and that 's supposed to be ok because , see , it 's a true story .
it 's about rubin " hurricane " carter ( denzel washington ) , a legendary african american prizefighted who is unjustly convicted of triple homicide with the help of a ghastly ( racist ! )
detective ( dan hedaya ) who 's had it in for the " big - shot " hurricane ever since he arrested him for stabbing a white man with a knife ( in self - defense but who cares , right ? )
when rubin was only ten .
he is to serve three life sentences with no possibility of parole .
most of the film takes place when he is in his 15th year in prison .
to the rescue -- lesra martin ( vicellous reon shannon ) and his team of wanna - be detectives .
lesra is an african american teenager taken in by three well - off canadian white people ( hanna , unger , schreiber ) to get an education .
lesra and his buddies go to a book sale where lesra picks out his very first book -- " the sixteenth round , " rubin 's autobiography .
immediately thereafter , schreiber 's character tells lesra " sometimes we do n't pick the books we read , they pick us .
" hmmm .
after a few visits to the prison , they become convinced of rubin 's innocence and launch their own full - scale investigation even though two juries have convicted him .
they meticulously go through all the files and revisit all the old witnesses ( i wonder if any of them might be cranky old women who slam the door in their faces ? )
and in the course of their relentlessy tedious sleuthing uncover obvious evidence confirming the hurricane 's innocence that was either ignored or never seeked out during the first two proceedings .
of course , we 're already told that he 's innocent .
a movie like this is especially frustrating because we 're not being shown everything significant that happened to carter during this period in his life .
all too obviously , we 're getting the hollywood watered- down version .
that would be ok except that the parts we are getting is milked for every single drop of melodrama that the filmmakers could possibly squeeze out of it .
it 's almost cruel .
the melodrama is n't of the entertaining kind either ; it 's the hokey , rammed - down - your - throat variety where every emotion is exaggerated to the point of absurdity .
witness the villain ferociously grinding his teeth at the final trial or the constant pseudo - saintliness of our four protagonists .
the hurricane is your basic courtroom movie except
it 's a no - frills courtroom movie .
it 's formula stripped to the bare necessities .
you have your wrongly accused black man .
you have your melodramatic final courtroom scene .
but there 's nothing else .
you 'd expect some sort of involving investigation .
but that 's not necessary since we 're implicitly informed of his innocence .
thus the whole middle portion of the movie is reduced to the protagonist brooding .
brooding to himself .
brooding to other inmates .
brooding to lesra .
brooding to lesra 's canadian friends .
brooding in letters .
i do n't think i 'll ever look at brooding the same way again .
it was n't long before i got tired of hearing the hurricane 's exceedingly deep meditations on his condition .
i wanted something to happen .
as for washington 's performance in the title role -- i figured i 'd have to address it sooner or later considering the amount of attention it 's received -- he is top notch , though
still boring .
how is that possible ?
well , he does what jewison wanted him to do perfectly .
unfortunately what jewison asked him to do is a load of crap .
what a waste of a great performer .
speaking of wastes , why the hell did john hannah agree to do this ?
he 's an extremely talented actor and i love him dearly , but what is he doing here ?
to call his character ( along with schreiber 's and unger 's ) a stick figure would be a gross understatement .
all three of them come off as veritable mother theresas , as benevolent as do - gooders come .
if they 're to play a major part in this movie , why not make them real people , with real feelings and emotions ?
look : if you 're going to make a formula movie , do n't undermine the formula .
courtroom dramas can be fun , but this is ridiculous .
not only is it trite , it 's boring .
Solution:
N