Q: Patti delivered to Sharron's desk this week a copy of my 2000 accomplishments. You should find that when you return to the office. Let me know if for some reason you do not have that copy, and I will have another delivered. Have a happy new year! I will be at the Cotton Bowl watching Meagan's drill team perform - and also watching some of the game. Thankfully, no emotional attachment to either team in that game! I just hope that we don't freeze.
Propose a subject line
A: 2000 Accomplishments
IN: Dear Alumni, Please see opportunity for Director, International Education with IDP Education Australia in Washington, DC. Interested candidates should e-mail cover letter and resume by November 30, 2001 to contact listed following job description. Thank you.

Generate a subject line.

OUT: Career Opportunity: Director, International Education with IDP Education Australia in Washington, DC.
IN: This is an email
OK, I apologize, I've been trying to lock myself to the computer and crunch some #'s, but can't seem to get control of my schedule. Wanted to lay out the core/noncore model that's been pitched (and that CMA showed keen interest in this morning) to see if we're all on the same page; but perhaps this is the analysis that you're already working on: Split takes place either 1.1.03 or 6.1.03. Core and noncore are responsible for the "DWR past purchases" (spread over 15 years). Core will keep IOU gen, QFs and DWR contracts (which would eliminate the short for the core) Noncore, in return for giving up the lucrative IOU gen, effectively accepts the short position (i.e., goes to market) AND does not get sacked with DWR's going forward costs (with "forward costs" defined as all power costs attributable to the "post-core/noncore" transition date. Let me know if this tracks with where we're headed. Thanks. Best,

What is the subject?

OUT: Concept for core/noncore Analysis
QUESTION: Rick Tucker at Pan Canadian (he used to be at PG&E) called and has been speaking to Willie Harrell on the Confirm Desk, and I believe Willie spoke to Mark about this issue yesterday, but it appears to be unresolved and I think Mark was going to talk to you about it. Pan Canadian is doing EOL trades, and wants to know why he keeps getting the online confirms w/the GTC's attached since the way the system is set up he technically is already agreeing to the GTC's online. He feels he is having to look at a lot of unnecessary paper. Rick will be out of the office Friday and Monday, but was hoping you could give him a call Tuesday to discuss this issue. His phone # is 713/331-5049. FYI, we do not have a master in place with Pan Canadian Energy Services.
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: EOL-Pan Canadian
David A. Forster was granted agent and AIF status via resolution on 28 Mar 01. If Tana wants it revoked, she will provide a date of revocation. Please draft the appropriate document for Teresa's review. Tana - - I'm on vacation 8 - 13 Oct. The EPMI consent electing Forster as VP is dated 1 Oct 01. It's on it way to you. Thanks to everyone.
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: Revocation of AIF - Enron Networks Investments LLC
Leslie Lawner called and asked if TW could help with the funding of this organization. As you will recall, the "NM First" group has taken positions on right of way issues that are consistent with TW/Enron's view on Indian right of way issues. Leslie asked if we could kick in $1000. I leave this to you guys to weigh in on--If you think it's worthwhile, let me know and one
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer:
NM First Town Hall Energy Summary