In this task, you're given a review from Amazon's food products. Your task is to generate a short summary of the given review in the input. Note that you don't need to write a complete sentence as a summary.

Example Input: I ordered these without having tried them before- I tried a similar product made by a different brand (possibly a slightly different flavor?) and loved them, so when I saw these I thought "yes!" and ordered the bulk pack. When I tasted them, however, my stomach said, "no!" These are disgusting. I repeat: disgusting. They taste like ketchup, mustard, LOTS of sugar and EGG. Which mixed together tastes like vomit. Say, what you might expect after eating cotton candy and a corn dog and an omelet and then riding the tilt-a-whirl. I have tried them several times to see if it is "an acquired taste" but, for me, it is not. These make me nauseous every time. Too bad. I really wanted to like them. Anyone want 4 and a half bags of this?
Example Output: Not My Taste Preference

Example Input: Watch out, we had a couple of bad tasting bags from a 40-count box from costco recently. When opening up the third, many of the popcorn kernels inside were odd looking, inconsistent. It is too bad, so now we are going to air popped popcorn, after using Orville's bags nearly daily for a few years. Eden's organic popcorn was OK so far, but harder to find. Now will try Bob's (red mill?) popcorn kernels. Hoping none of these are of the genetically modified type of corn.
Example Output: Caution, do not accept bad tasting popcorn.

Example Input: Despite the plethora of positive product reviews for these snacks, I see no reason to buy them again. Read those positive reviews and compare the content in some of them to the guidelines of a non-profit consumer organization for reviews. They contain a lot of "Wow!" with little specifics that would have been included by a true believer. Weigh the others as you will, but the proof is still in the pudding. The texture is their best asset (if you like that sort of texture); that's about it for me. They appear to be an extruded potato product (many of those out there) with various seasonings that do not impress me, either. The most basic of them puts 160mg of sodium into the TINY .8oz package. If you were a deer, you might eat them for that alone. The fat is reduced, that much is true. But... Unless you are ready to trade fat for sodium, it's no deal. But wait... baked kettle chips, in a 1oz serving, up the fat to... 3G, the same as the .8 of the basic flavor. You got .2OZ free on that one. The baked kettles possess 135mg sodium, vs. 160. These chips give you 1G fiber in .8 vs. 2 in 1oz of baked kettles. This product loses again. The only place you might 'gain' is in carbs 21 for the kettle chips, 15 for these, but remember... you have .2oz extra in the kettle's nutrition info... just about a wash. And then, topping it all - the cost... $0.92 an oz vs $0.44 for baked kettles in subscription. Wow. These wonderful snacks cost $14.72 per pound, packed as they are. The prices will fluctuate... but think about the things you can buy for that money instead. These are microscopic bags (that does not help the environment, either - portion control aside) with product largely deriving its kick from sodium and cheap spices. The most positive thing I can say is the product is packed very well. Lots of air in the bags to protect the chips, and they will mostly arrive intact in their tiny portions in tiny bags. You won't have many crumbs in the bottoms of these little bags, so that is a good thing. But... bottom line... expensive junk "health food". "Wow!".
Example Output:
Not impressed