In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.
--------
Question: Comment: As you can see, the problem is that it fails to comply with Federal statute. No gender-based discrimination, buster. It obviously also flies in the face of the principles of our US Constitution.

40 U.S. Code 122 - Prohibition on sex discrimination
(a)Prohibition. With respect to a program or activity carried on or receiving federal assistance under this subtitle, an individual may not be excluded from participation, denied benefits, or otherwise discriminated against based on sex.

Answer: Non-obscene

Question: Comment: Who gives a darn about the so called three founding nations. There is blatant bigotry and hypocrisy when that term "founding nations" is used as a smoke screen for racism. My family has been here for well over two hundred years. Does that give me license to discriminate against others? No! If ratepayer's referendums were the standard for zoning changes, NIMBYs would stop 90 of all development. In this case the referendum was invoked, because of local resistance (code word for racism) to the development. The referendum was used by weak politicians for cover.

Answer: Obscene

Question: Comment: Every time I hear Joseph speak, I think he's a bigger fool. I hate to say that, with him being a CU guy, but there it is. The ONLY solution here is to play Lynch. See what he's got, and we go from there. We know Brock sucks about as much as TS. This season is likely lost no matter what, unless Lync surprises. Very unfortunate with such a good defense.

Answer:
Non-obscene