Jim and Rick, I will am resigning from Enron and terminating my employment, effective December 31, 2001. At the first of the year, I will be joining the consulting team building RTO West. It has been a great opportunity to work with you here at Enron. I have learned a great deal. Thanks for all you kindnesses to me. Steve Contact Information:
Answer: Resignation from Enron
Here is an email: Attached is a listing of the top 200 customers on EOL ( as provided by Dave Forster's EOL Team). We have gone in and started to cross reference the customer overlay to determine who the PHASE 1 ( top 10 or 15 ) target customer identified as the most important for each business unit/region. Can you please add your input for your region first thing on Friday A.M. Thanks and if there are any questions, please give either Frank Vickers or myself a call. BT
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: EOL Customers.xls
Q: Attached is a revised LOI for WT1. I took out all the language concerning materials and equipment obligations incurred by ECS. After talking with Knippa, I understand that after the sale of the motor to TW, they will be doing all of the installation. Please review and provide comments.
Propose a subject line
A: WT1 Docs
IN: Greg, ACTION - PLEASE CALL TODD REID AT DUKE BACKGROUND: Below is the situation with Duke and subs: Exposure Line Cash L/C Duke Energy Marketing LP / ECC ($43mm) $10mm $52.35mm $20.5mm Duke Energy Trading & Marketing / ENA ($56mm) $5mm $61mm Duke Energy Trading & Marketing / EPMI ($260mm) $20mm $171mm $100mm The expiration of the letters of credit are 11/30/01. Duke believes that since these L/C's have less than 20 days to expiry their value should be zero and are asking for additional cash collateral. Our view of the contract is that these L/C's are good collateral until expiry and should be counted in our outgoing collateral. The roll of the letter of credit has been delayed as Haedicke/Mintz get comfortable with the reps under the L/C facility. Duke credit guys are saying that Todd Reid has not received a return call from you and this holding up a resolution. Bill and Louise

Generate a subject line.

OUT: Duke Situation
IN: This is an email
Since Wednesdays and Thursdays are not good meeting days, please email me with your 1st & 2nd preferences so that I can better accomodate your needs. ALSO, PLEASE ADVISE ME TODAY IF YOU ARE GOING TO HAVE CONFLICTS THIS THURSDAY, AS WE WILL CANCEL THIS WEEK'S MEETING BASED ON YOUR RESPONSES. (I NEED 24 HOURS TO CANCEL THE FOOD)

What is the subject?

OUT: Attorney Roundtable Meeting Changes
Holli: EWEB's Board Resolution of December 5, 2000 permits financial hedging in general and authorizes: "The General Manager or other authorized officers as noted in the Power Risk Management Guidelines to execute confirmations of transactions within the limits specified in the Power Risk Management Guidelines." Each time ENA trades with EWEB, the trader must verify whether the EWEB trader is authorized under the then current version of the Power Risk Management Guidelines. Each date you execute a trade: (1) you will need a list of authorized traders (authorized to enter into derivative transactions) certified by EWEB's secretary to be correct as of the Trade Date and (2) a statement certified by EWEB's secretary that the Transaction falls within the limits specified in the most current version of the Power Risk Management Guidelines, effective as of the Trade Date. We have only a portion of the Power Risk Management Guidelines and it is dated April 19, 1999. Our version is incomplete and probably outdated. Maybe EWEB will provide you with the current version. It would be a lot easier if EWEB's resolution simply authorized it to enter into financial trades documented under the ISDA (which is what most resolutions permit). However, EWEB did not obtain a broad resolution. To Melissa, Sharen and Kim: We should also verify that our confirmations contain these representations. Please talk to me.
Answer:
EWEB