Categorize the comment on the basis of obscenity. If the comment is obscene output Yes, otherwise output No.
--------
Question: Agreed. If you look outside of the giant investor-bought buildings where they kick everyone out to make more money to satisfy large monied interests, almost all other "no-cause" evictions from smaller and independent landlords will have some good reason behind them, whether it is a problematic tenant (as described in one of the other stories from this article), family moving into the unit, wanting to renovate the property, etc.

If a tenant is a good tenant, that's worth a hell of a lot more than a small rent increase to keep them around. If the tenant is paying only 50% or 60% of the market rent, well, do we ask any other business or property owner to consistently provide their goods and services at a 40-50% discount for all time? No.

Answer: No

Question: Spot on. The original design was well north of 20 mil, even then they were cheap Charlie plans. And they kept cutting down from there. Kill this dog.

Answer: Yes

Question: To some extent being the Governor in Alaska means something. Individual members of the legislature are NOT the equivalent of the Governor because he/she did not run for or be elected to that authority level. For this reason it is very important that the Governor be connected to the people. In this case he (still) is (interested in what they think). Individual members of the legislature may be sincere in his/her belief system. But that's all it is: his/her special, personal bias. Save we pray from the hydra. Thanks.

Answer:
No