Question: Oslo, Norway (CNN) -- The suspect in the bombing and mass shooting in Norway believed the terrorist attacks were "horrible," but "in his head (they) were necessary," a man who identified himself as the suspect's lawyer told Norwegian broadcaster TV2.

Geir Lippestad told TV2 late Saturday that he represented Anders Behring Breivik, who was arrested Friday after twin terror attacks that left at least 92 dead.

Breivik "is ready to explain himself" in a court hearing Monday, Lippestad said.

CNN unsuccessfully attempted to contact Lippestad.

While they have only arrested one suspect, police in Norway have not ruled out the possibility that someone else may have been involved in the explosion in Oslo and a shooting at a youth camp on Utoya island

"We're not sure it's just one person... based on statements from witnesses, we think there may be more," Acting National Police Chief Sveinung Sponheim said Saturday.

A 32-year-old Norwegian was detained and charged with terrorism, but police have not officially released his name. Local media have identified the man as Breivik, who has been described as a right-wing Christian fundamentalist.

"It's very difficult at this point to say whether he was acting alone or whether he was acting as part of a larger network," Sponheim said.

The suspect has been talking to authorities, but Sponheim described the day-long interrogations as "difficult."

At least four people are still missing, he said, as investigators continued to search for bodies of victims of the bomb attack in downtown Oslo.

The fragility of the damaged structures have made it a slow process, he said. 1. Who is Geir Lippestad?
2. What's the suspect's name?
3. What is ready to say in court?
4. When is he due in court?
5. Did CNN reach Lippestad for comment?
6. How many suspects were arrested?
7. Where was the explosion?
8. WAs there a shooting also?
9. Where?
10. Where specifically?
11. How old is the supect?
12. What's he charged with? Provide a numbered list of answers.
****
A numbered of answers: 1. suspect's lawyer
2. Anders Behring Breivik
3. Breivik is ready to say in court to explain himself
4. Monday
5. No
6. only one
7. Norway
8. Yes
9. Oslo
10. youth camp on Utoya island
11. 32 years
12. terrorism

Question: A Scottish woman has given birth to twins for the third time. Karen Rodger, 41, welcomed her first pair of girls rowan and Isla after having twice given birth to twin boys.

"I still haven't really taken it on board because I was convinced I was having two boys," Rodger told Sky News. Karen said her husband Colin was equally stunned when the couple learned they were going to have their fifth and sixth child. "He thought I was joking and immediately wrote back to say 'this is not funny'. I had to explain that it really was true," Karen said.

The average couple has about a 3 percent chance of having twins when not accounting for fertility drugs. And with each following pregnancy, the changes of producing twins a second, or even third time, become less.

Karen, a dance lecturer, first learned of the incredibly rare occurrence during a visit to her doctor and immediately texted her husband to share the news. "I just could not believe it. It never crossed my mind that it would be twins again. I just thought that wouldn't happen to people like me, but I'm ly delighted," she said.

It had been several years since the couple's last children were born. Their oldest twins are 14 and the second set was born just two years later. "I turned 40 and I thought, if I'm going to do it, I should do it now," Karen said. "I spoken to my husband and we both thought we'd quite like another one so that was it and, one month later, I was pregnant."

Colin says the age and gender difference will ensure a sweat-inducing dilemma for any future suitors of the twin girls. It will be a frightening challenge for any boyfriend. 1. what is the percent chance a couple has twins?
2. how many children does Karen Rodger have?
3. what is her husbands name?
4. what did they name the new twins?
5. are they girls or boys?
6. is this there first set of girls?
7. what does Karen do for a living?
8. how many sets of twins does she have?
9. how old is the first set?
10. and the second?
11. did Karen think anything like this could happen?
12. was she happy about it?
13. how old was she when she got pregnant with them?
14. was Colin joking around when heard the news? Provide a numbered list of answers.
****
A numbered of answers: 1. Three
2. six
3. Colin
4. rowan and Isla
5. girls
6. Yes
7. a dance lecturer,
8. Three
9. 14
10. 12
11. No
12. Yes
13. 40
14. Yes

Question: All antidepressant drugs are not created equal, according to the authors of one of the few studies that have ever systematically analyzed and compared "new generation" medicines for treating depression.

What qualities are important in an anti-depressant? Efficacy? Tolerance? Side effects? Cost?

In the analysis of 12 drugs, two came out on top as the most effective and best tolerated as first-line treatments: sertraline (Zoloft) and escitalopram (Lexapro). Venlafaxine (Effexor) and mirtazapine (Remeron) rounded out the top four for effectiveness, but venlafaxine was also among the four drugs patients were most likely to quit taking because of side effects. Reboxetine (Edronax) was less effective than the rest.

While psychiatrists treating depressed patients every day have had a sense of which medications are best, the current study "nails it," says Sagar V. Parikh, M.D., of the University of Toronto. Parikh, who wrote a comment accompanying the study that is published in the current issue of The Lancet, says the findings have "enormous implications" because, for the first time, they offer doctors an evidence-based, unbiased way to recommend treatment. And, he adds, they give patients a "gold standard of reliable information," especially since the study's authors plan to make their findings available free on the Web.

Not so fast, says Gerald Gartlehner, M.D., M.P.H., who coauthored a review of the benefits and risks of the same 12 drugs published last November in the Annals of Internal Medicine. He and his colleagues concluded, based on their review done while Gartlehner was at the RTI-UNC Evidence-Based Practice Center in Chapel Hill, North Carolina., that there was no clinically meaningful evidence that any one of the drugs was better than the rest. Instead, they argued, decisions on which drug to use should be based on factors such as cost and side effects. 1. How many different drugs were analyzed?
2. And what kind of drugs were they?
3. Were they all found to be equally effective?
4. Were any identified as being the most effective?
5. Which?
6. Were any of them definitively the least effective?
7. Which one?
8. Did they print the results in a journal?
9. Which one?
10. Were the results important?
11. Who suggested that?
12. And what's his profession?
13. Where does he work?
14. Is there universal agreement that the results were important?
15. Who believes that?
16. Do his coworkers believe it too?
17. Where did they do their work leading to that conclusion?
18. In what state?
19. And what do their results suggest on the other hand?
20. Did they publish their work too? Provide a numbered list of answers.
****
A numbered of answers:
1. 12
2. antidepressants
3. no
4. yes
5. sertraline and escitalopram
6. yes
7. Reboxetine
8. yes
9. The Lancet
10. yes
11. Sagar V. Parikh
12. a doctor
13. University of Toronto
14. no
15. Gerald Gartlehner
16. yes
17. at the RTI-UNC
18. North Carolina
19. none the drugs was better than the rest.
20. yes