Categorize the comment on the basis of severe toxicity. If the comment is severely toxic output Yes, otherwise output No.

Ex Input:
I think that Donkel funds himself. I haven't pried into his business affairs, but I gather that his is a Florida based, family owned company that, among other ventures, buys oil leases and contracts out the drilling. I consider his comments to be that of a persistent salesman, who is too often repetitive and somewhat unimaginative ... but what more can you ask of someone who has apparently little more (just guessing) than a high-school education, and has pulled himself up by his own bootstraps? And among his barrage of words, he does seem to make a couple of good points which could possibly be of some benefit to Alaska. His mother is really pleasant to talk with, (and she has a good sense of humor) and they certainly sound very much "All American". Very sociable, not uppity at all. I think that they would make good neighbors.

Ex Output:
No

Ex Input:
This letter provides so many opportunities for humor or other remarks but I do agree on one conclusion. Since the Bucks parked in front of the Jack in the Box dinning room on W11th is out the EWEB building is the last option. But of course with the new and improved city council coming up one of them will come up with a whole new legacy building scheme. Eugene Skinner would more likely shake his head and say my city full of fools.

Ex Output:
Yes

Ex Input:
NE Portlander wasn't talking about the obsession with "Authentic Portland" Or stupid Old vs New Portland. But the rapidly rising obesity rates in the city.

Ex Output:
Yes