Given a passage with a context and an answer, construct a question on the basis of the information present in the passage. Construct the question in such a way that (i) it is unambiguous, (ii) it is answerable from the passage, (iii) its answer is unique (iv) it answer uses text phrases from the passage. Avoid creating questions that (i) can't be answered correctly without actually understanding the passage and (ii) uses the same words or phrases given in the passage.

Context: Are the results of cemented titanium hip arthroplasty as bad as described in literature? We present the 10-year results of a cemented mild grid blasted Titanium-Aluminium-Vanadium Stem in Total-Hip-Arthroplasty.', 'The clinical and radiological reexamination was documented in standardized questionnaire in which several scores were integrated. All X-rays were stored and analysed by a special hardware and software computer system.', "35% of all patients could be reexamined both clinically and roentgenologically. 71 patients were male (mean age 56.1 years) and 130 female (mean age 59.3 years). The average follow-up period was 11 years and 4 months. The mean Merle d'Aubigne hip score increased from 10.5 to 16.0 points at the follow-up evaluation. Radiolucent lines were according to the zones of Gruen seen in 1% to 22% depending on the zone and the size of the femoral component. 18 reoperations of the femoral component (2.9%) had to be performed. The survivorship analysis (Kaplan-Meier) showed a 95.4% survival of the femoral component after 10 years.
Answer: Our findings with a cemented mild grid blasted Titanium-Aluminum-Vanadium stem demonstrate excellent results unlike it was reported for cemented femoral components of similar alloy but different design and cementation philosophy.
Does [ 10 year result with a cemented fine-grit-blasted titanium-aluminum-vanadium hip endoprosthesis shaft ]?