Problem: Write an article based on this summary: Question the logic of the Big Bang Theory. Note the changing attitudes on evolution in the scientific community. Remind doubters that God is not subject to the laws of nature. Shift the burden of proof to the nonbeliever. Suggest that blind adherence to science is a kind of religion in itself.

Answer: One point on which believers and atheists frequently clash is the origin of the world. The next time someone tries to tell you that the universe was created through the random activity of subatomic particles, push back by demanding to know how those particles came into being. Ultimately, you can reason, there had to be some source, and that source was the Creator. The Law of Conservation of Matter and Energy itself states that matter and energy can't be created or destroyed, but can only change form. In other words, the things that make up the physical world couldn't have come from nothing. If you need further support, pull from Bible passages like Hebrews 11:13, which states, "By faith we understand that the universe was created by the word of God, so that what is seen was not made by things that are visible." These days, the Theory of Evolution is often taken for granted as concrete fact. However, it's still only a theory, one that's looked upon with more uncertainty every day. Even renowned evolutionary biologists have begun expressing doubts about the truthfulness of Darwinian evolution. This pokes a big hole in many atheists' favorite go-to argument. The idea that evolution is driven by an unseen "sentient" force and not random natural selection as once thought is compelling evidence for the presence of God's will. Brush aside atheists' complaints of a lack of evidence of God in the physical world by assuring them that the very nature of God defies observation or testing. Just because He was responsible for shaping the dimensions of space and time doesn't mean He's bound by them. God can't be put under a microscopeHe can only be felt. Explain to your listener that the five senses can only receive stimuli from the natural environment, which God both permeates and sits outside of. Any argument that attempts to disprove the existence of God by physical means is a weak one. Ordinarily in religious debates, it's left up to the devout party to justify their belief in God. Turn the tables on your listener by challenging them to provide proof that what they believe is true. Respond to their secular theories with questions like, "How do you know that?" and, "Can you prove that that's the case?" Prompting them to back up what they say will stop them in their tracks. If your listener is honest, they'll likely admit that their views aren't as unshakable as they originally thought. At the very least, they'll get a sense of how frustrating it is to be questioned aggressively. Be careful not to come across as though you're just being contentious. Atheists often rely on the idea that science is irrefutable to back up their position. What they don't realize is that religious skepticism also requires a kind of leap of faith. Whenever your listener brings up a scientific theory, ask them to explain it in detail. Chances are, they can't. Note that this demonstrates some degree of unknowing acceptance on their part. Elaborate on your criticism of science as alternative faith by pointing out that your listener has only actually observed a very small percentage of what they believe in, and that the rest has been dictated to them by institutions with agendas of their own. It's also worth mentioning that much of what is commonly regarded as scientific fact is essentially just a working hypothesis. For this reason, your listener has no more claim to the validity of their beliefs than you do.

Problem: Write an article based on this summary: Rate how your life is aligned with each value on a scale of 1-10. Determine if your career is aligned with each value using a scale of 1-10. Look for values that you aren't currently expressing in your life.

Answer:
Start at the top of your list and work your way down. Think about how each value is reflected in your life and how closely you follow it. If you feel this value is fully expressed, give yourself a 10. However, if you don't see this value at all in your life, give yourself a 1. For example, let's say you value artistic expression. You might give yourself a 10 for artistic expression if you make art, learn about art, go to local art museums, and have a few art prints that you love. However, you might only give yourself a 1 if you have a few books about art but don't really include it in your life. Ideally, you'll express your values through your career choice so that you're fulfilled in your life and work. Think about how your job or career might express each value. Give it a 10 if you feel like your career reflects the value, but give it a 1 if it doesn't. For example, let's say you value helping people. If you work at a local nonprofit, you might give yourself a 10 for helping people. On the other hand, if you have a job where you don't interact directly with people, you might only give yourself a 3, which might make you feel unfulfilled. After you rate your career and your life based on your values, identify the values you hold but aren't incorporating into your life. These are areas you can work on improving in order to feel happier and more fulfilled. Additionally, it'll help you find more meaning in your activities. Make a list of the values you want to incorporate into your life more. Use this list as you start to make changes to your life.