Q: Premise: "A girl sitting on a chair backwards."
Hypothesis: "A girls is sitting backwards on her chair."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
A: yes
Chain-of-thought: On a chair backwards is a rephrasing of sitting backwards on chair.

Q: Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "A child smiling in a park."
Hypothesis: "The child's mother is standing in the picture."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
A: it is not possible to tell
Chain-of-thought: The fact that a child is smiling doesn't imply the child's mother is standing.

Q: Can we conclude from "A dog in a field with a frisbee." that "The dog is playing with the fresbee."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
A: it is not possible to tell
Chain-of-thought: Being with a Frisbee doesn't imply he is playing with it.

Q: Premise: "Two people are waiting for their food."
Hypothesis: "People are waiting on food."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
A: yes
Chain-of-thought:
People who is plural for two people's waiting on their food.