Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.

Probably just out for a quick spin.
My dog used to do that all the time.
Yes

The Juneau Access Road (JAR) should be re-named the Kensington Access Project (KAP)---Every time I see arguments for and against this project, and the overly optimistic cost-benefit analysis, given terrain and conditions north of Berner's Bay, I always get the distinct feeling that developers will "see the light" right about the time the road gets to the Kensington Mine.
Yes

I have lived in Alaska almost 30 years. I think all responsible users are NOT "toking and driving" - just as responsible drinkers do not "drink and drive." Those who don't honor the law or principles of ethics are certainly not 'moral' in the sense I mean, and you should not have written they are among 'the most moral people' you know. Surely we must express disapproval of unsafe driving, as an absolute minimum. And maybe we should rethink legalization - if it going to make access easier to a significant population which won't behave well. As well as rethinking making the penalty for bad behavior merely a fine - which is the new proposed code. Sounds like those who have money and no sense are getting a 'get out of jail free card' until they actually kill someone.
No