Problem: Write a positive (OPTIONS:
- negative
- positive) yelp review.
A: Wow...just wow! I often give 5 star reviews, but you have GOT to try this place!!! The food, everything is from scratch, is some of the best I have had in town!! I had the B.A.L.T. Panini and it was fantastic. I didnt think it was dry like another reviewer did, but the only knock I would be able to give is the avocado was too green. My wife had the Senjanka salad and though it was rich she thought it was very good. Last thing...if you don't try their dessert I will punch you through your iPhone...in your face!

Problem: Write a negative (OPTIONS:
- negative
- positive) yelp review.
A: I saw this place while strolling through the Mirage and the atmosphere seemed snazzy and relaxing. So I peeked at the menu and it looked pretty decent. I proceeded inside and hoped for the best. Sadly, FIN was a bust for me. I ordered some sort of duck dish with rice and the duck was bland and the rice seemed to have a weird taste. Also, the duck hadn't been de-boned and the amount of work it took to get any meat off these bones was just unreasonable. Now to be fair, the server did warn me the bones would still be intact, but I'm a newbie when it comes to eating duck and apparently I had no idea the effort it would take just to wrangle a morsel of meat from this creature. So not only was my meal bland but also frustrating. My family also seemed to echo my sentiments about the food's flavor. We all kind of agreed that it had potential but something was just a little off. And I think anyone who's been to FIN would agree, for the kind of money you're paying, you should be having a meal that will knock your socks off. Next time I will coast right past FIN and head to Cravings, the Mirage buffet. It's not excellent either, but it's leaps and bounds better than FIN.

Problem: Write a negative (OPTIONS:
- negative
- positive) yelp review.
A:
My daughter, Kate, has been a patient of Dr. Anne Garrett of Scottsdale Children's Group since she was born September 11, 2013. As a family, we were insured under Cigna through the company I worked for. After giving birth to Kate, I decided not to return back to work after my maternity leave so I could be a stay-at-home mom. The last day of my work was January 3, 2014. I was under the assumption that I was covered under Cigna through the end of January 2014, as this is what my company had informed me. January 14,2014 was Kate's scheduled 4-month well-check, where she would get her 4-month shots (HIB, DTAP,INADM, Pneumococcal and Rotavirus). When we checked in, I was asked if our insurance was still through Cigna and I told them it was. I received a statement in the mail March 28, 2014 from Scottsdale Children's Group for Kate's 4-month well-check visit in the amount of $778.44 -statement date March 26th. Apparently, when they submitted the claim to Cigna, it was denied as it said my coverage ended 12/31/13. Again, I believed coverage was good through the end of January. I called Scottsdale Children's Group billing department, April 8, 2014 to inquire about this and see if there was anything they could do to help with the expense as this amount was out of our budget. Sylvia in billing told me they could give me a 20% discount, which would take $156.60 off the total cost OR they could set up a payment plan. I told them I would get back to them. On April 10, 2014, I called their office to find out what the no-insurance rate would be for a 4 month well-check visit. Jennifer in scheduling told me the cost was $177 for the visit and $85.32 for all vaccines, totaling $262.32. When you look at the "self-pay" price vs. the insured amount of each vaccine (totaling $640) on the bill, it is astronomically different. So, I called Sylvia back on April 14, 2014 to let her know my findings and told her we would be willing to pay the self-pay rate of $262.32 today as I was not insured and have this settled. She went on to inform me this was not an option as when I came in, they were giving us the insured rate of $778. The $262.32 is the State's rate and if I would have told her I was uninsured at the time of visit, we would have received that rate. Again, I was unaware we were not covered by Cigna at this time. So, basically, they are telling me there are two different rates: 1) State's self-pay rate and 2) Insurance rate - difference $360. This is CRAZY!!! Why even be insured? Sylvia and I were not coming to an agreement as they were not willing to accept the $262.32, which we were willing to pay that day and I was not accepting the $621.84 discounted price they were giving me. That is a $360 difference in price and with only one income this really wasn't feasible for us. She told me my options were to a) pay the $621.84 b) set up a payment plan or c) she could send this to Dr. Garrett to review. I told her I'd like for Dr. Garrett to review and to let her know we would like to pay the $262.32 today to get this resolved. I was waiting for a response from their office and never received one, so I followed up the morning of April 22, 2014 and spoke to Sylvia's manager, Esther. She informed me that Dr. Garrett withdrew us from her practice and sent my statement to collections. I told Esther this was the first I'd heard about this and asked why hadn't someone called me to inform me this is what was going to happen. She said a letter was sent out on April 18, 2014. This is absolutely absurd and bad business practice! I told her it hadn't even been 30-days since the statement date and you are already sending this to collections! I had been waiting for a call back from their office on Dr. Garrett's response and I'm the one that has to follow up. It seems crazy that if you are uninsured, you get better rates by triple the amount than if you are insured. I would not recommend this practice.