Given the task definition, example input & output, solve the new input case.
In this task, you are given text for US Congressional and California state bills, your task is to generate a summary for this bill.
Example: SECTION 1. LIABILITY OF BUSINESS ENTITIES PROVIDING USE OF FACILITIES
TO NONPROFIT ORGANIZATIONS.

(a) Definitions.--In this section:
(1) Business entity.--The term ''business entity'' means a
firm, corporation, association, partnership, consortium, joint
venture, or other form of enterprise.
(2) Facility.--The term ''facility'' means any real
property, including any building, improvement, or appurtenance.
(3) Gross negligence.--The term ''gross negligence'' means
voluntary and conscious conduct by a person with knowledge (at
the time of the conduct) that the conduct is likely to be
harmful to the health or well-being of another person.
(4) Intentional misconduct.--The term ''intentional
misconduct'' means conduct by a person with knowledge (at the
time of the conduct) that the conduct is harmful to the health
or well-being of another person.
(5) Nonprofit organization.--The term ''nonprofit
organization'' means--
(A) any organization described in section 501(c)(3)
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and exempt from
tax under section 501(a) of such Code; or
(B) any not-for-profit organization organized and
conducted for public benefit and operated primarily for
charitable, civic, educational, religious, welfare, or
health purposes.
(6) State.--The term ''State'' means each of the several
States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto
Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, the Northern
Mariana Islands, any other territory or possession of the
United States, or any political subdivision of any such State,
territory, or possession.
(b) Limitation on Liability.--
(1) In general.--Subject to subsection (c), a business
entity shall not be subject to civil liability relating to any
injury or death occurring at a facility of the business entity
in connection with a use of such facility by a nonprofit
organization if--
(A) the use occurs outside of the scope of business
of the business entity;
(B) such injury or death occurs during a period
that such facility is used by the nonprofit
organization; and
(C) the business entity authorized the use of such
facility by the nonprofit organization.
(2) Application.--This subsection shall apply--
(A) with respect to civil liability under Federal
and State law; and
(B) regardless of whether a nonprofit organization
pays for the use of a facility.
(c) Exception for Liability.--Subsection (b) shall not apply to an
injury or death that results from an act or omission of a business
entity that constitutes gross negligence or intentional misconduct,
including any misconduct that--
(1) constitutes a crime of violence (as that term is
defined in section 16 of title 18, United States Code) or act
of international terrorism (as that term is defined in section
2331 of title 18) for which the defendant has been convicted in
any court;
(2) constitutes a hate crime (as that term is used in the
Hate Crime Statistics Act (28 U.S.C. 534 note));
(3) involves a sexual offense, as defined by applicable
State law, for which the defendant has been convicted in any
court; or
(4) involves misconduct for which the defendant has been
found to have violated a Federal or State civil rights law.
(d) Superseding Provision.--
(1) In general.--Subject to paragraph (2) and subsection
(e), this Act preempts the laws of any State to the extent that
such laws are inconsistent with this Act, except that this Act
shall not preempt any State law that provides additional
protection from liability for a business entity for an injury
or death with respect to which conditions under subparagraphs
(A) through (C) of subsection (b)(1) apply.
(2) Limitation.--Nothing in this Act shall be construed to
supersede any Federal or State health or safety law.
(e) Election of State Regarding Nonapplicability.--This Act shall
not apply to any civil action in a State court against a business
entity in which all parties are citizens of the State if such State
enacts a statute--
(1) citing the authority of this subsection;
(2) declaring the election of such State that this Act
shall not apply to such civil action in the State; and
(3) containing no other provision.
Output: Shields a business entity from civil liability relating to any injury or death occurring at a facility of that entity in connection with a use of such facility by a nonprofit organization if: (1) the use occurs outside the scope of business of the business entity; (2) such injury or death occurs during a period that such facility is used by such organization; and (3) the business entity authorized the use of such facility by the organization.
Makes this Act inapplicable to an injury or death that results from an act or omission of a business entity that constitutes gross negligence or intentional misconduct, including misconduct that: (1) constitutes a hate crime or a crime of violence or act of international terrorism for which the defendant has been convicted in any court; or (2) involves a sexual offense for which the defendant has been convicted in any court or misconduct for which the defendant has been found to have violated a Federal or State civil rights law.
Preempts State laws to the extent that such laws are inconsistent with this Act, except State law that provides additional protection from liability. Specifies that this Act shall not be construed to supersede any Federal or State health or safety law.
Makes this Act inapplicable to any civil action in a State court against a business entity in which all parties are citizens of the State if such State, citing this Act's authority and containing no other provision, enacts a statute declaring the State's election that this Act shall not apply to such action in the State.
This Bill focuses on shielding business entities from civil liability relating to an injury or death depending on the conditions of injury, hence the generated summary is correct.

New input case for you: SECTION 1. EXTENDED PHASE-IN OF THE INPATIENT REHABILITATION FACILITY
CLASSIFICATION CRITERIA.

(a) In General.--Section 5005 of the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005
is amended--
(1) in subsection (a), by striking ''apply the applicable
percent specified in subsection (b)'' and inserting ''require a
compliance rate that is no greater than the 60 percent
compliance rate that became effective for cost reporting
periods beginning on or after July 1, 2006''; and
(2) by amending subsection (b) to read as follows:
''(b) Continued Use of Comorbidities.--For cost reporting periods
beginning on or after July 1, 2008, the Secretary shall include
patients with comorbidities as described in section 412.23(b)(2)(i) of
title 42, Code of Federal Regulations (as in effect as of January 1,
2007), in the inpatient population that counts towards the percent
specified in subsection (a).''.
(b) Medical Necessity Criteria for Beneficiaries Served in
Rehabilitation Hospitals and Units.--The Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services and Medicare fiscal intermediaries, Medicare
administrative contractors, recovery audit contractors, and other
government agents shall use and apply the criteria established in HCFA
Ruling 85-2, as issued on July 31, 1985 (50 Fed. Reg. 31040), as the
sole standard for determining the medical necessity of services
provided by inpatient rehabilitation hospitals and units to Medicare
beneficiaries under title XVIII of the Social Security Act.

SEC. 2. RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CLASSIFYING INPATIENT REHABILITATION
HOSPITALS AND UNITS.

(a) Report to Congress.--Not later than 12 months after the date of
the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Health and Human Services,
in consultation with physicians, administrators of inpatient
rehabilitation and acute care hospitals, Medicare beneficiaries, and
trade organizations representing inpatient rehabilitation hospitals and
units, shall submit to the Committee on Ways and Means of the House of
Representatives and the Committee on Finance of the Senate a report
that includes--
(1) an examination of the impact of the 75 percent rule on
the Medicare program and the specific impact of the rule on
Medicare beneficiaries; and
(2) alternatives to the 75 percent rule policy for
determining exclusion criteria for inpatient rehabilitation
hospital and unit designation under the Medicare program,
including determining clinical appropriateness of inpatient
rehabilitation hospital and unit admissions, and including
alternative criteria based solely on a measure of a patient's
functional status which is independent of diagnosis.
For the purposes of this section, the term ''75 percent rule'' means
the requirement of section 412.23(b)(2) of title 42, Code of Federal
Regulations, that 75 percent of the patients of a rehabilitation
hospital or converted rehabilitation unit are in 1 or more of 13 listed
treatment categories.
(b) Considerations.--In developing the report described in
subsection (a), the Secretary shall include the following:
(1) The effect of the 75 percent rule on access to
inpatient hospital rehabilitation care by Medicare
beneficiaries and the effectiveness of care available to such
beneficiaries in other health care settings.
(2) A comparative analysis of the overall Medicare system
costs, including Medicare expenditures to acute care hospitals,
home health agencies, skilled nursing facilities, and long-term
care hospitals, resulting from implementation of the 75 percent
rule.
(3) A analysis that compares the quality, cost, and patient
outcomes of inpatient rehabilitation services among different
post-acute care settings, including whether the Medicare
program and Medicare beneficiaries may incur higher costs of
care for the entire episode of illness because of factors such
as--
(A) readmissions to acute care hospitals that could
have been avoided absent the 75 percent rule; or
(B) extended lengths of stay in post-acute settings
other than a rehabilitation hospital or unit because
beneficiaries were denied access to care in such a
hospital or unit due to the 75 percent rule.

SEC. 3. TECHNICAL CORRECTION FOR INPATIENT REHABILITATION HOSPITALS AND
UNITS NOMENCLATURE.

(a) In General.--Section 1886(j) of the Social Security Act (42
U.S.C. 1395ww(j)) is amended--
(1) in paragraph (1)(A), by striking ''(in this subsection
referred to as a 'rehabilitation facility'), other than a
facility'' and inserting ''other than a hospital or unit'';
(2) by striking ''rehabilitation facility'' and
''facility'' and inserting ''inpatient rehabilitation hospital
or a rehabilitation unit'' and ''hospital or unit'',
respectively, each place it appears;
(3) by striking ''rehabilitation facilities'' and inserting
''inpatient rehabilitation hospitals or rehabilitation units''
each place it appears; and
(4) in paragraph (6), by striking ''rehabilitation
facilities' costs'' and inserting ''costs of inpatient
rehabilitation hospitals or rehabilitation units''.
(b) Use of the Term ''IRH/U''.--The Secretary of Health and Human
Services shall, under regulation and Medicare program guidance, use the
term ''inpatient rehabilitation hospital/unit'' or ''IRH/U'' to refer
to entities receiving payment for inpatient rehabilitation services
under section 1886(j) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395ww(j)).

SEC. 4. EFFECTIVE DATE.

Sections 1 and 3 of this Act shall take effect on July 1, 2007, and
section 2 shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act.
Output:
Amends the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 to revise the classification criterion used to determine whether a hospital or hospital unit is an inpatient rehabilitation facility under title XVIII (Medicare) of the Social Security Act. Eliminates the current schedule of applicable percentages. Directs the Secretary of Health and Human Services, instead, to require in the classification criterion a compliance rate no greater than the 60% compliance rate that became effective for cost reporting periods beginning on or after July 1, 2006.

Requires the Secretary, for cost reporting periods beginning on or after July 1, 2008, to include patients with comorbidity in the inpatient population that counts towards such 60% compliance rate.

Requires the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services and Medicare fiscal intermediaries, Medicare administrative contractors, recovery audit contractors, and other government agents to use and apply the criteria established in HCFA Ruling 85-2, as issued on July 31, 1985, as the sole standard for determining the medical necessity of servivces provided by inpatient rehabilitation hospitals and units to Medicare beneficiaries.

Directs the Secretary to report to specified congressional committees: (1) an examination of the impact of the 75% rule on the Medicare program, and specifically on Medicare beneficiaries; and (2) alternatives to the 75% rule policy for determining exclusion criteria for inpatient rehabilitation hospital and unit designation under the Medicare program.