QUESTION: Dr. Lay (in care of - Rosalee Fleming): We are very pleased to have you participate in our "Markets in Transition" symposium on January 10, 2001. I will be sending additional information to you, but I wanted to give you some "advance warning" on a couple items. We will be putting together a symposium brochure in December. As part of that, we would like to get a biography of you (about 200-250 words in length), and a photograph. We will need this by around the first of December, so I wanted to give you a little advance notice. I will contact you after Thanksgiving to provide more details around this event. If you have any questions in the meanwhile, feel free to contact me. Brad Burke Associate Director, Rice Alliance
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: Rice University - Markets in Transition Symposium - Jan. 10, 2002
market_relations@nyiso.com writes to the NYISO_TECH_EXCHANGE Discussion List: *****Reminder Notice************ Dear Market Participants On October 17, 2001, the NYISO web servers will be upgraded. This will require both software and hardware changes. While these changes will be transparent to the users, these changes will require that the MIS system be unavailable for approximately 60 minutes. The outage will begin at approximately 11:35 AM. Market Participants planning on submitting HAM transactions or modifying Day Ahead bids should act accordingly. The NYISO will minimize the duration of the outage as much as possible as we recognize the inconvenience caused by system outages. Ultimately, these changes will result in a more stable environment and provide enhanced services that the current web servers are unable to perform.
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: NYISO - MIS Outage - October 17, 2001 - Reminder Notice
Attached please find the referenced list. Some additional comments are as follows: 1. City of Redding-no change from our previous approvals. 2. Cajun Electric Power-no west coast power (caiso or firm). It can only trade east coast power and Enron can only purchase from Cajun via EOL. As usual, no European power until further notice.
Answer: Counterparty Approval List for 1/14/00
Here is an email: We are moving ahead with finalizing a Master Netting Agreement that will cover all physical and financial agreements between BNP Paribas and Enron, except for the exchange agreements pertaining to NYMEX and LME trading. The agreements to be included under this arrangement are listed below. The intent is to complete the agreement by close of business on Tuesday, November 27. We have communicated this to Bart Schouest at BNP Paribas and to BNP Paribas' counsel in New York. 1. ISDA Master Agreement dated effective as of June 28, 1995 between Enron North America Corp., formerly Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp., and BNP Paribas, formerly Banque Paribas (as the same may have been or may be amended, restated, supplemented of otherwise modified from time to time, and including all Transactions, schedules, annexes, and confirmations thereunder, collectively). 2. Interest Rate and Currency Exchange Agreement dated effective as of January 16, 1992 between Enron Corp. and BNP Paribas, formerly Banque Paribas. 3. ISDA Master Agreement dated effective as of February 22, 2000 between Enron Capital & Trade Resources International Corp. and BNP Paribas. 4. ISDA Master Agreement effective as of April 4, 2000 between Enron Credit Limited and BNP Paribas. 5. General Terms & Conditions governing transactions executed between Enron Capital & Trade Resources Limited and BNP Paribas. 6. General Terms & Conditions governing online transactions executed between Enron Capital & Trade Resources Limited and BNP Paribas for the Sale and Purchase for Flat UK Beach Trades. Please address any questions or concerns to me ASAP. Regards,
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: BNP Paribas Master Netting Agreement
Q: Dave, Using the numbers we have today and the Pemex volume of 240/day @ $0.25 as we have noted does not get KM to where we would want to be. I layered on an additional 5 year commitment on the 240/day to cover some of the gap but we were still short of targets. I then modified the debt term to 20 years which should be acceptable as the project would be supported for that length by the extended term and that covers an additional portion of the gap. However, we are still short of our target and my calculations indicate a need to have 22/day @ $0.25 starting in year 3 and lasting through year 20 to make up the difference. In the alternative, a rate of $0.267 with the 20 year term and 20 year debt note also gets us there. All in all, neither one is that big of a hill to climb so we know what we are looking at. Mark, Could you review from TW's perspective and see if you come up with numbers in the same ball park?
Propose a subject line
A: Transpecos
Here is an email: Kim, I am sending you the presentations by Krishna and Y. Feng. These presentations may be further modified by both Krishna and Youyi before Wednesday. Vince
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A:
Power Point Presentations by Krishna