Question: Sentence A: The Greeks dubbed it Ebysos, the Romans called it Ebusus, and the Moors, Yebisah.

Sentence B: In Greek, Eloyis; In Roman, Eboysos; In Moors, Jesus.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question: Rewarding people for good outcomes and punishing them for bad ones is relatively easy when the quality of the outcomes is easy to measure.
Outcomes are very easy to put into quantitative measurements.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Problem: Here is a premise:
There is a precedent to the Che cult.

Here is a hypothesis:
The Che cult has a precedent.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Sentence 1: To contribute to its strategic goal to restore and maintain the health of the land, BLM set an expectation for senior executives to understand and plan for the condition and use of public lands.

Sentence 2: The BLM expects its managers to understand the use of public lands.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: yes

Question:
For a summary of recent studies addressing retirement saving adequacy, see Paul Yakoboski, Retirement Plans, Personal Saving, and Saving Adequacy, Employee Benefit Research Institute, EBRI Issue Brief

Does it follow that "For a full-length discussion of retirement saving adequacy please consult an astrologer. "?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
no

Question:
Based on the premise "4 A lack of suitable jobs.", can we conclude that "Nobody wants to work a job that doesn't suit them."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
it is not possible to tell