This is the content of an email: Hi, I know everyone is doing their best, and it is appreciated, but: How can The Association continue to justify asking residents to pay the same fees month after month after month while simultaneously failing month after month after month to provide all the services we pay for? I'm curious: has the board has addressed the possibility of reducing fees commensurate with services provided? If they did and (obviously) decided to keep things the same, I'd appreciate a glimpse into the "why" of that decision. Just wondering aloud after another one-elevator-day. I would greatly appreciate an official response from the board by email. Thank you very much for time, Mike Mancini 1103 (of course, I am well aware we received a month free, which works pretty well considering the building was unlivable most of that month. I am aware, too, of water damage checks for, yes, damage. I'm not aware of anything in the works, however, to reasonably address the last many months of poor service, nor the predicted next 6-12 months of the same... I most certainly welcome enlightenment if I am missing something simple---really!)

Subject: You know, I've been wondering....

This is the content of an email: Marie - per our conversation yesterday afternoon, attached are proposed drafts of the Schedule and the Para. 13 relative to the above. Having spoken with Dennis Goldmann, I am advised that there are currently 2 Guaranties in place in the sum of $8M each: one by Niagara Mohawk Holdings Inc f/b/o Enron, and one by Enron Inc. f/b/o Niagara Mohawk Energy Marketing. I am told that our respective credit departments want to raise the credit lines to $10M for each party, but to effect that we will have to modify the existing Guaranties accordingly. Let me know if this is your understanding, as well. After you have had the chance to review the attached, please send me a marked-up draft and we can discuss our concerns from there.

Subject: ISDA between Niagara Mohawk Energy Marketing, Inc. and Enron Power Marketing, Inc.

This is the content of an email: Deal NN6788.1 with Citibank has been killed. This was an EOL deal that Citibank and John Arnold agreed to cut in half. Deal QF9221.1 was booked in Dec. for half the volume of the original deal. Unfortunately, deal NN6788.1 was not killed when we booked the new deal. Please call me with any questions. Thanks,

Subject: Deall NN6788.1

This is the content of an email: Hey Susan, I hope things are going great! Do you remember Nathan Thomas? He is getting married on August 11th(I will be one of the groomsmen). I thought you might be interested. Have fun, Paul PS - How are things going?
Subject: Nathan Thomas