This is the content of an email: Ted Murphy and I met this morning with the Arthur Andersen team that accompanied us to Sao Paulo. We reviewed a summary of our observations and recommendations as a result of our visit. After a few suggested changes, AA should forward a copy of this draft to you via e:mail later today. We would welcome your comments on the document, and input on anything that you think we may have missed. Ted and I will be reviewing this information with Rick Buy and Rick Causey as soon as a meeting can be scheduled, so your prompt comments or feedback would be welcomed.

Subject: Output from Operations/Controls Review

This is the content of an email: Good morning everyone, Timesheets are due once more, please let me know if you have any exceptions (vacation, sick...) for Oct. 15 -31 pay-period. I would really appreciate your input by 3 pm, today. If your time is regular, simply reply with "no exceptions".

Subject: Timesheet for Oct 15-31

This is the content of an email: DICTATION DRAFT FROM GREG PORTER I just spoke with Georgetta Baker, lawyer for SoCalGas, and Rick Miles, FERC's ADR group. We discussed the possibility of mediation based upon both parties representing in pleadings filed in Docket No. RP01-620 (TW Complaint) that both companies were interested in alternate dispute resolution (ADR). After discussing the various types of ADR, we agreed to begin with mediation. Rick Miles will be the mediator. The mediation process that was discussed was an evolutionary one whereby parties would meet in a neutral location to discuss resolution (i.e., settlement) of its claims. Both parties indicated a willingness to settle. Rick Miles will act as a facilitator. Mr. Miles' function will be one of moderating discussions and not evaluative. As the mediation process continues without resolution, Mr. Miles' role will evolve. Later on, if the parties desire, Mr. Miles offered to bring in a FERC staffer that is a subject matter expert to offer his or her views of each party's case. Also, if the parties desire, the subject matter expert would indicate how he or she would recommend the Commission rule on the merits. Initial dates of November 7-8 or November 13-14 were offered as potential dates for the first meeting. A neutral location needs to be agreed upon. Once additional information is learned, I will advise. In the meantime, if you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me.

Subject: TW v. SoCalGas (Dictation Draft from Greg Porter)

This is the content of an email: Tanya: Bob Crane did a deal with the Canadian party identified below. Sounds like he originally told our FX trader that the parties would be EGM (actually ENA) and Enron Industrial Markets ("EIM"). In the end, EIM was not the correct party but the Canadian party was the correct party. Is this trade between ENA and Compagnie de Papiers Stadacona authorized by credit? Is the company eligible? Please let me know what you think. Thanks.
Subject: FX trade Counterparty