Given a paragraph about movies and a set of conversational questions and answers about the paragraph, say whether the passage contains sufficient information to answer the follow-up question. Say Yes if it is answerable; otherwise, say No. The paragraph has the prefix 'CONTEXT:'. Each conversation question has a prefix 'Q:' followed by the answer prefix 'A:', and the follow-up question has a prefix 'FOLLOWUP_Q:'.
--------
Question: CONTEXT: Whilst he lay recovering from his wounds his father, who had little regard for him and wanted to ensure his own position of power set to work. He had authority when he was hand which his father took. He had power due to his wild men who had been removed. He had influence over the Gold Cloaks and guard via Bron etc. This had been removed. All of his allies and supporters had been bought by his father or sent away whereas his enemies now enjoyed the protection and power of his sister and nephew. He now has no political authority and no muscle to back his claims. He was also given no credit for what he did in defending the city. Overall he was not so much disgraced as had his status and power taken by Tywin which left him vulnerable. <sep> Q: Why was Tyrion disgraced? A: Overall he was not so much disgraced as had his status and power taken by Tywin which left him vulnerable Q: Do you think Tywin was a good father? A: his father, who had little regard for him Q: Did the The Hand have many duties? A: He had authority when he was hand which his father took <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: what does val ar morghulis mean?

Answer: No

Question: CONTEXT: For US Federal civilian employees, there is no prohibition against having spouses (or immediate family members) working in the same agency or even the same unit. The only prohibition is that one of them cannot be in a supervisory chain of command above the other (conflict of interest/nepotism). I'm fairly certain state agencies would have similar restrictions as well. As in any workplace setting, it depends on the culture of the agency (fictional CBI in this instance) or personalities of those involved/affected on how much coworker dating relationships are on the down-low. It can vary. Normally it's not a big deal unless a supervisor starts dating his/her subordinate or something like that. It looks like the CBI in this case prefers keep personal relationships to a minimal so that it won't adversely affect decisions out in the field. So the characters might want keep it on the DL just to avoid it coming up in office politics/rumor mill/etc. <sep> Q: Is it forbidden to have a relationship in CBI in reality? A: It looks like the CBI in this case prefers keep personal relationships to a minimal so that it won't adversely affect decisions out in the field Q: Is CBI a real thing in America or was it made up for the Mentalist? A: fictional CBI in this instance Q: Is there a comparable department in the US in reality? A: US Federal civilian employees <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Are they allowed to have personal relationships while working together or will they have to quit their jobs like the CBI agents?

Answer: Yes

Question: CONTEXT: As I recall, if Mia didn't accept her position as Princess of Genovia, the Baroness would likely have been next in line to become Queen after Clarisse was no longer able to rule. For some time toward the end of the movie, it looked like Mia was not going to accept her princessship (that should be a word), implying that the Baroness thought she was quite likely to become Queen. Of course, given that Mia does decide to become a proper princess, anything the Baroness may have done in preparation for ascending to the throne herself (such as ordering custom stationery with her name and presumed title, as a power-hungry and egotistical character might do) will have gone to waste. In case you are a non-native/non-fluent English speaker, I'll clarify that the nameless lady probably does not literally believe the Baroness has ordered custom stationery. It's more a way of expressing cruel satisfaction that the Baroness will not be taking on the title of Queen. <sep> Q: What is the meaning of the nameless lady's words to Baroness Joy von Troken? A: a way of expressing cruel satisfaction that the Baroness will not be taking on the title of Queen <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Why did she not like the Baroness?

Answer:
Yes