The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the no-need strategy, otherwise output No. no-need is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used when a participant points out that they do not need an item based on personal context such as suggesting that they have ample water to spare. no-need can directly benefit the opponent since it implies that the item is up for grabs.
Example: Context:
Utterance: 'how about I give you 2 waters and 1 food package in exchange for all your firewood?'
Example solution: No
Example explanation: The utterance does not use the no-need strategy since it never refers to an item that the participant does not need.

Problem: Context: 'I would also like a little extra food for my kids. Maybe we can split it somehow?' 'Ok, I am willing to give you one food, in exchange for two firewoods, that would mean you get 3 waters, 1 food and 1 firewood. you get 5 items, while i get 4.' 'If I only get 1 food, than I would like 2 firewood. So you get 2 food, 1 firewood, and 1 water.'
Utterance: 'No i do not need water, as i am camping near a potable stream. I would like 2 firewood. It is only fair that i get two firewood, since you are getting more supplies (5), i think i should be able to choose what 4 i should get.'
Solution: Yes