Detailed Instructions: Given a passage, construct a question on the basis of the information present in the passage. Construct the question in such a way that (i) it is unambiguous, (ii) it is answerable from the passage, (iii) its answer is unique (iv) it answer uses text phrases from the passage. Avoid creating questions that (i) can't be answered correctly without actually understanding the passage and (ii) uses the same words or phrases given in the passage.
Q: We continue statistical development of the posterior probability of linkage (PPL). We present a two-point PPL allowing for unequal male and female recombination fractions, thetaM and thetaF, and consider alternative priors on thetaM, thetaF.', 'We compare the sex-averaged PPL (PPLSA), assuming thetaM = thetaF, to the sex-specific PPL (PPLSS) in (thetaM, thetaF), in a series of simulations; we also compute the PPLSS using alternative priors on (thetaM, thetaF).', 'The PPLSS based on a prior that ignores prior genomic information on sex specific recombination rates performs essentially identically to the PPLSA, even in the presence of large thetaM, thetaF differences. Moreover, adaptively skewing the prior, to incorporate (correct) genomic information on thetaM, thetaF differences, actually worsens performance of the PPLSS. We demonstrate that this has little to do with the PPLSS per se, but is rather due to extremely high levels of variability in the location of the maximum likelihood estimates of (thetaM, thetaF) in realistic data sets.
A:
Does the incorporation of prior genomic information necessarily improve the performance of Bayesian linkage methods : an example involving sex-specific recombination and the two-point PPL?