I finally got a price quote of $1990 per year on a package deal for one user. Platts doesn't sell the data without a subsciption to the daily publication. The package includes the daily issues and data(table) and back issues and data. Please let me know if you want me to go ahead and sign up for this package. I'll have to let Platts know the user's name and billing information etc... Thanks.
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: Gas Daily Table
Dear Market Participant, Technical Bulletin # 78 - Penalties for Persistent Undergeneration - is being distributed for Market Participant comment. The Technical Bulletin will be posted to the NYISO web site following the comment period. Please note that the penalties described in this Technical Bulletin are effective as of October 1, 2001. The purpose of our Technical Bulletins is to facilitate participation in the NYISO by communicating various NYISO concepts, techniques, and processes to Market Participants before they can be formally documented in a NYISO manual. Please forward comments on this Technical Bulletin, via email, by 5PM on Tuesday, October 2, 2001 to: Peter Lemme NYISO Customer Technical Services plemme@nyiso.com (See attached file: TB_78_draft.pdf) - TB_78_draft.pdf
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: NYISO - Technical Bulletin # 78 - Penalties for Persistent Undergeneration
At my Technology Investing advisory, we reap HUGE GAINS from the opportunities other investors miss. OUR SECRET WEAPON? A laser-like focus on All-Tech, All-the-Time. You see, most investment advisors pride themselves on a broad reach across dozens of industries. They claim that gives you more opportunities to profit. But that's JUST BALONEY. There's no way one individual -- or even a substantial team -- can spread
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: Another quick 105% gain. YOUR TURN next???
Entergy filed proposed revisions to its pro forma OATT relating to Ancillary Services Schedules Nos. 3, 4, 5 and 6, proposed to be effective August 1, 2001. Entergy's basic premise is that the pro forma tariff and ancillary services established as part of Entergy's Open Access Transmission Tariff settlement in Docket No. ER95-112 should be changed. Entergy states that current charges are based on the amount of energy transmitted by Entergy without regard to the amount of capacity and energy Entergy must maintain in order to provide these services, and that these charges should be capacity-based rather than energy-based. EPMI -- among several other parties -- protested the filing.
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer:
Entergy -- order on ancillary services filing (ER01-2214)