Question: Sentence A: The main entrance is through an inverted glass pyramid designed by American architect I.M.

Sentence B: The American architect I.M. designed that inverted glass pyramid.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Question: Such assertions also serve as an attempt to discount the need for meaningful reform to help prevent future accountability failures.
There is a need for reform to prevent future failures in accountability.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Problem: Here is a premise:
In the United States, power generation is responsible for 63% of sulfur dioxide (SO2), 22% of nitrogen oxides (NOx), and 37% of man-made mercury released to the environment.

Here is a hypothesis:
Power generation creates a lot of sulfur dioxide.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Sentence 1: And can anybody remember Renee Richards, the transsexual tennis-playing physician?

Sentence 2: Can anybody remember the homosexual tennis-playing physician?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: no

Question:
It was late, and the place was thinning out.

Does it follow that "The place is still crowded."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
no

Question:
Based on the premise "the quarterback all of them every one that they played i think they played uh i can't remember whether we played three or four quarterbacks but all of them were bad i mean they were terrible they could not pitch you know they couldn't even take hand-offs it was terrible", can we conclude that "They couldn't play the game right, as if they didn't know what they were doing."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
it is not possible to tell