Premise:
"Therefore, for the purpose of a classification system for financial reporting, the fee is akin to dedicated taxes that are also related in the aggregate to associated costs and that are classified as nonexchange revenue (e.g."
Hypothesis: For the purpose of a classification system for financial reporting, the fee is not akin to dedicated taxes
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

no

input question: It was most obvious. If this premise is true, does that tell us:"It was blatant."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: yes

Question:
Based on the premise "But I thought you'd sworn off coffee.", can we conclude that "I thought that you stopped drinking coffee because it gave you the jitters."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
it is not possible to tell

Question: Sentence A: We, therefore, have a dilemma.

Sentence B: There is no problem.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question: AMIGA was then modified to approximate the assumptions behind each of the four scenarios.
Amiga was changed so it could make better coffee.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Problem: Here is a premise:
On the island's west side, the Fontana Aretusa is a freshwater spring (just steps from the ocean) with black-and-white ducks swimming in its semi-circular papyrus pond.

Here is a hypothesis:
There are no freshwater springs located anywhere on the island.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer:
no