IN: This is an email
California: A01-10-011 PG&E Gas Accord. On Monday Jan. 7th Greg Klatt will enter an appearance on behalf of Transwestern at PG&E's Gas Accord Prehearing Conference. This will maintain our position to participate in the proceeding as needed. I99-07-003 SoCal Unbundling. SoCal filed its Advice Letter No. 3015 to implement the CPUC's Dec. 11th decision to unbundle the SoCalGas Transmission and Storage Systems however the filing only addresses Ordering Paragraph Nos. 9-15 of the decision. This section of the order directs SoCal to outline within their tariff the Comprehensive Settlement Agreement arrangements for allocating stranded costs. It does not address capacity or open season issues as dictated by the order. We will investigate the filing with SoCal as to the status of addressing these issues. A01-10-024 SoCalGas BCAP. In regard to filing comments on EGA's motion to strike the testimony and related materials on embedded cost-based allocation versus the long-run marginal cost methodology for the hearing on Monday, Jan. 7, 2002, it was decided not to file comments, but continue monitoring the proceeding. By participating Transwestern will continue to have the option of addressing any of the issues raised by other parties. CPUC Infrastructure Report. The Commission has issued its report and assessment of the state's gas infrastructure for the three major utilities in California. Their conclusion is that the natural gas transportation and storage systems are adequate to provide reliable amounts of competitively priced gas to residential, commercial, industrial and electric generation customers. Therefore they recommend that the Power Authority should not finance any new natural gas projects. Schedule: Week of Jan. 7 - Omaha

What is the subject?

OUT: Weekly Report of 1/4/02
QUESTION: Dear Board Members: Lekha and I are hosting a Customer Appreciation Dinner at my house and would like to invite you and your spouse. The dinner is by special invitation to our top 100 customers. It is scheduled the evening of our Board Meeting, Wed., 24 Oct at 7pm. The next morning we will have our Five.Two presentation. You are invited to attend any of these functions. Please let me know if you are able to attend. We would be happy to arrange any transportation/hotel that you may need. Regards,
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: Invitation
I have received the list of CES agreements which George put together as having Texas delivery points and have been attempting to put together a back to back agreement similar to the back to back agreement which ENA has with CES; however, I keep running into confidentially agreement problems. I understand that these CES agreements relate to June business and have no deals and/or term beyond that point. I suggest that the deliveries under these agreements be documented as a GTC Confirmation between ENA and HPL and thus avoid the confidentiality agreement problems. George Weissman and Bob Hall feel that this is a workable solution. We will proceed with the preparation of GTC's for each deal unless I hear otherwise.
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: CES - counterparty contracts with Texas delivery points
Ben/Chris, Unless something new comes up, I think we finished the letter agreement. I'm awaiting a revised draft now, and if it is acceptable to NW, they will sign it and fax it to me tomorrow morning. Maybe on Ben's layover we can have a discussion about where we go from here from a schedule standpoint. Talk to you tomorrow, Kay
Answer: NorthWestern exclusivity letter
Here is an email: Jeff, My brother had this guy call him and he forwarded his resume. Do you know him? Any interest? If you do, please forward on. Thanks,
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: resume of former Duke collegue
QUESTION: I believe we need to assign someone from the Central Desk to be the point person for CES Central Desk activity, for pricing and scheduling issues. CES currently has issues with the BTU conversions at the different Michcon citygates. ENA delivers the gas to different Michcon citygates and each one has a different BTU factor. This causes CES to be long or short depending on the conversion factor. I'm not sure if there is anything we can do about it but I would prefer to have someone from the Central Desk address this issue. Comments?
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS:
CES Central Desk Issues