Premise:
"You're a cynic, Evie, said John, laughing. "
Hypothesis: You are the most cynical person I know, Evie, said John.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

it is not possible to tell

input question: Apparently my plan of throwing out the really good ones has now been exposed. If this premise is true, does that tell us:"Throwing out the really good ones, which was my plan, has been exposed. "?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: yes

Question:
Based on the premise "What would she be likely to do with it afterwards?", can we conclude that "What would she do with it before?"? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
no

Question: Sentence A: The position is much as though they had got hold of an incriminating document, but couldn't read it because it was in cipher but we know that the draft treaty wasn't in cipher couldn't be in the nature of things so that won't wash.

Sentence B: The incriminating document was written in cipher and couldn't be read.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Question: All of the organizations monitored compliance with organizational policies to some extent.
None of the groups had any policies or guidelines to start with.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Problem: Here is a premise:
Meanwhile on the Iberian peninsula, Rome was leaving a decisive imprint on the area's language, culture, and government, and particularly in its engineering genius in the construction of roads, aqueducts, and monuments.

Here is a hypothesis:
Rome conquered the Iberian peninsula and forced its culture on the people.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer:
it is not possible to tell