In this task, you're given a pair of sentences, sentence 1 and sentence 2. Your job is to determine if the two sentences clearly agree/disagree with each other, or if this can't be determined. Indicate your answer as yes or no respectively.

[EX Q]: Sentence 1: The final rule was issued pursuant to the authority of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and the Public Health Service Act as codified at 21 U.S.C. Sentence 2: The last rule can be enforced per two other acts.
[EX A]: yes

[EX Q]: Sentence 1: In addition, GAO has said the national strategy development and implementation should include 1) a regular update of a national-level threat and risk assessment effort, 2) formulate realistic budget and resource plans to eliminate gaps, avoid duplicate effort, avoid hitchhiker spending, and protect against federal funds being used to substitute for funding that would have occurred anyway, 3) coordinate the strategy for combating terrorism with efforts to prevent, detect, and respond to computer-based attacks, 4) coordinate agency implementation by reviewing agency and interagency programs to accomplish the national strategy, and 5) carefully choose the most appropriate policy tools of government to best implement the national strategy and achieve national goals. Sentence 2: GAO does not deal with terrorism control.
[EX A]: yes

[EX Q]: Sentence 1: The Corinthian portico was designed by James Gandon, who was also responsible for the Custom House on the north bank of the Liffey. Sentence 2: The Corinthian portico is a beautiful building.
[EX A]:
no