Problem: Here is a premise:
In 1997, LSC adopted final regulations clarifying a504(a)(16).

Here is a hypothesis:
In 2004 the LSC adopted final regulations.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Sentence 1: oh i expected those i mean Hollywood i mean they were doing their dealings with that before they even got over there i think

Sentence 2: I expected the dealings to be completely done before they got there.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question:
um no no i haven't had any problem

Does it follow that "no, i've never had any trouble with the people at that place"?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
it is not possible to tell

Q: If Nowhere in the book does Hatfield warn the reader that he has altered details or created composite characters to protect his sources., can we say that "Hatfield did not warn the reader of altered details"?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A: yes

Premise:
"I'd shore like to keep th' barkeep busier than a beaver buildin' hisself a new dam."
Hypothesis: I intend to keep the barkeep busy.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

yes

Sentence 1: But the Texan was shucking boots and clothing in turn.

Sentence 2: But the Texan was taking off boots and clothing.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer:
yes