Given a paragraph, generate a claim that is supported by the given paragraph. 1) The claim must contain information from within the paragraph. 2) A sentence within the paragraph can be used as a claim. 3) The claim should not have contradictions within the paragraph. 4) The claim should be at most one sentence long.

Example Input: This is a tricky one. The story does not explicitly address cost, except to call text messaging "a scalable and affordable approach." For many (or most) patients, the cost of receiving four text messages a week would likely be negligible covered by an individual's phone plan or by nominal text rates. However, not everyone owns a mobile phone, a fact that makes access (and cost) a more significant issue. However, the story does deliver on this point. The story discusses both the number of U.S. adults who own mobile phones (90 percent) and the fact that text messages are more accessible than other forms of mobile health communication (such as apps, which require patients to own smartphones or other smart devices). So, while we'd prefer a more in-depth discussion here, we'll awarda Satisfactory rating for the story's nod in this direction. The story addresses the range of benefits reported in the study, such as reduced cholesterol and blood pressure, but doesn't quantify that information or offer readers any context. For example, while the story says "patients who had received the text messages had reduced their cholesterol," the JAMA paper reports that patients who received the text messages had a "mean difference [of] 5 mg/dL" in "LDL-C." In other words, the information in the paper, while quantified, probably isn't very useful to many readers outside the health industry. Is "a mean difference of5 mg/dL in LDL-C" good? Bad? Irrelevant? This is where reporters have an opportunity to shine. If a news story can take those numbers and translate them into language that is accessible to non-experts, it provides a very real service. It would have been great to see that here. As long as people aren't driving and checking their cell phones, there don't appear to be any harms associated with receiving well-meaning text messages four times a week, so we'll mark this one "not applicable." This is a strong suit. The story not only offers a concise, but good, summary of the study but it also goes out of its way to address the study's limitations. For example, the study notes that the study "can't tell us whether text messaging could eventually lead to fewer subsequent heart attacks among the patients receiving those messages or whether the positive health outcomes would continue past the six-month study window." Good points, and we're glad the story includes them. No disease mongering here. The story includes input from an outside expert who was not involved with the research. The story clearly meets our bar here, although it would have been stronger if it had reached out to at least one more independent source preferably one who hadn't written an editorial that ran in conjunction with the paper in JAMA. Yes, the editorial was independent and provides some insightful commentary. But it also means we already knew where this source stood on the issue. Finding another reputable expert, who hadn't already weighed in publicly on the work, would have been great. The focus of the story is not so much on how the text message intervention directly reduced heart disease risk, but on the extent to which it resulted in patients taking steps to reduce their own risk such as by exercising more, smoking less, making dietary changes, or taking prescription drugs on a regular basis. The story does discuss other "mobile health interventions," such as smartphone apps but notes that there don't appear to be many mobile health projects that rely simply on text messages. The story also looks at how the text messages helped patients pursue lifestyle changes like exercising more and smoking less that reduced their risk. It was fairly clear from the story that this was a clinical trial, and that this particular service doesn't seem to be available to offer customized, encouraging text messages for heart disease patients. From the start, the story frames this research in the context of the much larger "mobile health" field. For example, the story notes that "While there are more than 100,000 health-related apps on the market, the evidence to date is lacking as to whether many of those apps are safe or effective." Since the story includes quotes from an interview, we can be fairly certain it went beyond the related JAMA news release.
Example Output: Text Reminders Help People Lower Cholesterol, Blood Pressure

Example Input: Australia and Japan have joined the list of almost 100 nations now limiting arrivals of people from South Korea, which reported 760 coronavirus cases on Thursday for a total of 6,088. Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe said Japan will suspend existing visas for visitors from China and South Korea and quarantine them for two weeks in response to the widening outbreak of the flu-like virus. The measures will go into effect on March 9. Following the announcement, the South Korean Foreign Ministry summoned a Japanese diplomat to "hear Japan's explanations regarding its announcement," Yonhap news agency reported, citing a ministry official. The South Korean government declared a "special care zone" around Gyeongsan, a city of about 275,000 people 250 km (150 miles) southeast of Seoul, promising extra resources such as face masks. Gyeongsan has seen a spike in cases in recent days, many of them linked to a fringe Christian group at the center of South Korea's outbreak. Similar zones have been declared around the neighboring city of Daegu and Cheongdo County. About 75% of all cases in South Korea are in and around Daegu, its fourth-largest city, according to the Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (KCDC). "Every day is sad and tough like a war. But our Daegu citizens are showing surprise wisdom and courage," Daegu Mayor Kwon Young-jin told reporters on Thursday. About 2,120 patients were waiting for hospital beds in Daegu, city officials said. Dozens of newly commissioned military nurses were due to begin work in the city on Thursday, according to the health ministry. The KCDC reported five more deaths from the virus, bringing the total to 37. The virus surfaced in China late last year and has infected more than 95,300 people and killed almost 3,300 worldwide, mostly in China, according to a Reuters tally. South Korea also said it was banning the export of face masks, and would step up their production and ration them to limit individual purchases to two a week, in an attempt to ease shortages and curb hoarding. People have flocked to supermarkets, pharmacies and online distributors to snap up masks and other supplies, with hundreds lining up at some stores every morning. KCDC Deputy Director Kwon Jun-wook advised all South Koreans to stay home and avoid "any gatherings, especially those that take place in enclosed places with many people such as religious events". He also advised employers in Asia's fourth-largest economy, highlighted by tech giants like Samsung Electronics Co Ltd, to allow staff to work from home. U.S. Forces Korea (USFK) reported two new cases, for a total of six among soldiers, employees or people related to the roughly 28,500 U.S. troops stationed in South Korea. Despite the new cases, USFK had resumed sending troops to bases in Daegu and surrounding areas, according to the military newspaper Stars and Stripes. It said commanders believed the bases were protected from the outside population, and troop rotations were needed to maintain readiness in the face of threats from nuclear-armed North Korea. Australia's ban on the arrival of foreigners from South Korea is a blow to Seoul's efforts to prevent the United States from imposing such restrictions. "It is a deeply regrettable step, and we will closely consult Australian authorities for a swift revocation of the measure and to minimize inconvenience for our citizens," Foreign Ministry spokesman Kim In-chul told reporters. South Korean officials met the U.S. ambassador in Seoul on Wednesday to urge the United States not to limit travel. Similar talks would be held on Friday with diplomats from other nations, the Foreign Ministry said. According to the U.S. State Department, anyone with a fever of 100.4 Fahrenheit (38 Celsius) is already banned from boarding direct flights from South Korea to the United States. Korean Air Lines said it would screen all departing passengers for high temperatures and reject those deemed a risk. South Korea also sent three "rapid response" teams to Vietnam on Thursday to help more than 270 citizens quarantined there over coronavirus concerns, the Foreign Ministry said.
Example Output: South Korea declares new 'special care zone' as coronavirus spreads.

Example Input: "Politics, step aside. The Truth-O-Meter must address a matter of Southern pride. The honor and reputation of our local groundhog General Beauregard Lee. For three decades, the South's most esteemed weather prognosticator has lived in the stout and lumpy shadow of Punxsutawney Phil. Phil makes the rounds yearly on the morning talk shows. He's made appearances with Oprah Winfrey and President Ronald Reagan. His agent even scored him a gig with Bill Murray in the 1993 movie ""Groundhog Day."" On Wednesday, PolitiFact Georgia scribes rolled our eyes as the public fawned over Phil once again during Wednesday's annual Groundhog Day celebration. Phil never saw his shadow, news accounts said. Spring will come early. But should you really trust Phil? Beau's website says our metro Atlanta celebrity is accurate 94 percent of the time. Phil's record is a measly 85 percent, it said. That stat has been picked up by various news outlets. Does Beau really deserve second place to that Yankee glory hog? PolitiFact Georgia decided to settle this matter once and for all. For the scoop on Beau's record, we talked to Art Rilling, CEO and founder of Lilburn's Yellow River Game Ranch, an attraction featuring people-friendly wildlife northeast of Atlanta. Beau lives there in a plantation-style manse named ""Weathering Heights."" For the past 10 years, his staff has calculated the General's accuracy by noting the number of days local temperatures hit the freezing mark during the six weeks after Feb. 2. Beau, like Phil, predicted an early spring for 2011. Sadly, Phil's staff has not tracked their groundhog's predictions so diligently. Their official stance is that their marmot is ""incapable of error, so his accuracy rate is 100 percent,"" said Mike Johnston, vice president of the Inner Circle of the Punxsutawney Groundhog Club. Wednesday was Punxsutawney's 125th groundhog celebration. German settlers brought the tradition, which is based on ancient myths that say hedgehogs, which resemble groundhogs, have the power to predict the weather. Phil's predictions are not site-specific. If he says that spring will come early, it will, Johnston said. Somewhere. When Phil's really wrong, Johnston added, it's the fault of poor Groundhogeese-to-English translation. ""People complain and tell us we're just making it up as we go along,"" Johnston said, ""but after 125 years of doing it, we don't need to."" Before we go further, the staff of PolitiFact Georgia feels obliged to mention that meteorologists have officially determined that groundhogs cannot predict the weather. Really. A tongue-in-cheek analysis by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's National Climatic Data Center concluded groundhogs show ""no predictive skill."" (Why do this? To help get kids interested in the science of weather.) Or, more bluntly, ""you can't take any stock in a groundhog predicting the weather,"" said Tom Ross, a meteorologist who helped put together the NCDC's report. It showed that between 1988 and 2010, Phil gave accurate national weather predictions 10 times out of 23 for a rate of 43 percent. True, but that won't stop us. Our groundhog's honor is at stake. Since the keepers of Beau and Phil do not keep comparable statistics, we performed an independent analysis using the NCDC study and National Weather Service data for 2001 through 2010. We defined ""early spring"" as a February with above-average temperatures. We then compared each groundhog's prediction with temperatures nationally and in his respective hometown. The NWS does not keep average February temperatures for the hamlet of Punxsutawney, Pa., so a kindly meteorologist gave us figures for Putneyville, Pa., a town at a similar elevation about 15 miles away. We found that the General predicted whether spring will start early nationally with 60 percent accuracy. Phil's rate was 30 percent. Beau predicted Atlanta weather with 50 percent accuracy. Phil got Punxsutawney's right 40 percent of the time. By our analysis, Beau's staff overestimated his success, but he's still 10 to 30 percentage points ahead of Phil. Georgia's underhog is the champion, paws down. General, emerge from the shadows. Stand tall on your stubby legs. The Truth-O-Meter salutes you with a ."
Example Output:
General Beauregard Lee Says he predicts the weather better than Punxsutawney Phil.