In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: To All the posters here, taxi cab drivers, and everyone else who cuts hair, who really knows how to run our muni, you should have exactly One And only One say.

Here's mine: Mark Begich is the biggest loser ever in Alaska - so ignore his noise. Why is he rated a loser? He is quite under-accomplished. He has only a high school degree, from Steller in the 80s no less, when all one had to do is show up in the "lizard lounge" (main office area) to be counted present. Mark Begich is a loser, in many ways, and is not in any way fit to be anything other than a slum landlord which is how he got his Alaskan politics start. His pals did a hit on Ted Stevens, which later was proven untrue.
Do your homework people, you will discover the truth!
While Bill Walker's proposals are not to my liking, I can respect his proposals, understand his effort to solve our state problems, for absolutely sure. mark begich - not so much!

Output: Non-identity-attack

Input: Consider Input: Comment: Trolling again, Trid? Sad.

Output: Non-identity-attack

Input: Consider Input: Comment: I lived in China for 6 years and still visit... they are a very good people that I have come to respect..... and we can learn a lot from them on many fronts.... I think its counter productive to question another country on how they run things... certainly when you look at what that leadership has got done even if some things are a work in progress..... the 2 things I have learned is that 1/ The Chinese care about China not other countries.... Its not a bad thing.. And 2/ They know how to make a deal.... go figure how these 2 things will go for us if we send in a bunch of Amateurs to do a deal even if we should walking away from a bad deal should always be a strong option..

Best approach is to work with the USA on a final NAFTA plan and only then look at a Joint North American /China deal.. if it makes sense at all.

or it will become a story about a mouse being kicked about by 2 big elephants when they go to deal mode lets ride in on the elephant we sleep right next too.
Output: Non-identity-attack