In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Example Input: Comment: Who gives a darn about the so called three founding nations. There is blatant bigotry and hypocrisy when that term "founding nations" is used as a smoke screen for racism. My family has been here for well over two hundred years. Does that give me license to discriminate against others? No! If ratepayer's referendums were the standard for zoning changes, NIMBYs would stop 90 of all development. In this case the referendum was invoked, because of local resistance (code word for racism) to the development. The referendum was used by weak politicians for cover.
Example Output: Obscene

Example Input: Comment: Your San Francisco ass will be saved by your dog, not by your spray. Too bad for your dog, but thank goodness the bear and the San Franciscan won't be hurt. You'll just buy a new dog to scatter his guts to save your ass.
Example Output: Obscene

Example Input: Comment: I have a friend who has been in a partnership with another man for 10 years. They do not live together because they do not share everything in their lives, i.e., they engage in same-sex sex acts with other partners unbeknownst to the other. Not suffering, not by a longshot. My friend lives a life in the closet from most of his coworkers.

He's actually said to me that he's considering getting married to a woman because he'd like to have a family. True story.
Example Output:
Non-obscene