QUESTION: Dear Louise- I had a request from Keith Fraley as he was departing... He is interested in purchasing from Enron the equipment used by his group for the mapping function. This would include a couple of PC's, a couple of servers and the big plotter. Is this something that can be pursued? Please let me know.. Thanks,
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: Mapping Equipment
Errol, Is a Macro problem your final answer on this?? I need an answer on this. If the beginning balances were changed in error, please let me know this so I can determine what I need to do to fix this variance. Again, this change did not affect your P&L. In the January 2001 PG book DPR, for the EOL Gas Daily Roll, you reduced your beginning Gross Balance for January by $9,066,220 and you increased your beginning Liquidated Balance for January by $9,066,220. So, the EOL Gas Daily Roll stayed flat in total and did not cause a problem P&L wise. However, this amount is falling out on my reconciliation for January. Could you please tell me what deal or deals were liquidated for $9,066,220, which in turn caused a reduction in your MTM?? We are concerned that these may be third party deals that Financial Settlements are not aware of. Thanks! !
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: PG Book
Please open the attached file to read the complete text of the following items: 09:11AM EDT 4-JUN-01 MORGAN STANLEY/DW (MUNSON, GILLIAN) EMC EMC CORP.: BANTER ON A BUDGET-WITH EMC 08:24AM EDT 4-JUN-01 MERRILL LYNCH (S.FORTUNA) CPQ AAPL DELL COMPAQ COMPUTER:COMPAQ FIELD TRIP HIGHLIGHTS 07:14AM EDT 4-JUN-01 SALOMON SMITH BARNEY (RICHARD GARDNER) CPQ CPQ: REDUCING REVENUE ESTIMATES; REITERATE 3H 07:02AM EDT 4-JUN-01 PRUDENTIAL SECURITIES (K.ALEXY) AAPL CPQ CMP WEEKLY INDEX OF PC AND ENTERPRISE HARDWARE, PC CHANNEL, AND DATA STORAGE STOCKS 04:35AM EDT 4-JUN-01 J.P. MORGAN (WALTER J. WINNITZKI) CPQ AAPL DELL CPQ: REDUCING ESTIMATES DUE TO ADVERSE INDUSTRY CONDITIONS 09:35AM EDT 4-JUN-01 WIT SOUNDVIEW (GARY HELMIG) IBM IBM (IBM) COMPANY UPDATE JUNE 4, 2001 HWP: EXPECT CAUTIOUS OUTLOOK AT JUNE 6 ANALYST MEETING 09:42AM EDT 4-JUN-01 SALOMON SMITH BARNEY (JOHN B. JONES JR.) HWP <<6.04.01 Analyst Reports.doc>> The analyst reports provided are reports prepared by independent analysts who monitor and track Compaq's performance. These reports are not prepared by or at the direction of Compaq and as a result, Compaq is not endorsing or verifying the information contained in these reports or endorsing any of these analysts. These reports are being provided solely for business reasons and as a result, do not distribute these reports to other individuals outside of Compaq. If other individuals are interested in receiving the reports provided herein, please contact Elizabeth Davis in Compaq's Investor Relations Department at elizabeth.davis@compaq.com.
Answer: Financial Analysts' Reports for 6.04.01
Here is an email: At the request of Mark Greenberg, I am forwarding to you the proposed Non-Disclosure Agreement between Pricewaterhouse (for CreditDimensions) and Enron Credit Limited. Mark Greenberg has spoken to the counterparty and made a few changes to Pricewaterhouse's form. If you have any questions about the transaction, the business person on the deal is Kim Detiveaux here in Houston. Otherwise, we would appreciate your assistance in getting Richard Sage in London to execute this agreement.
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: NDA - PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Q: Mike (Day): As you know from the work with the DA coalition, UC/CSU is extremely interested in ensuring that the prohibition on DA included in AB1X gets "fixed" in SB27X. Of couse we'd ideally like to make sure that the language providing the "fix" makes it crystal clear that customers retain the right going forward. There's some concern that the "fix" language that's been floating around thus far needs some tightening to wring out the ambiguities. In that regard, Mike Smith is going to try to craft some language and forward it to you. We'll need to try to get Mike (Smith's) language into the draft that you're putting together based on last Friday's meeting, preferably before you circulate the next draft to the DA coalition. Mike Smith, I'll assume that you'll contact Mike Day directly, but Mike (Day), if there's any questions, don't hesitate to contact me. Thanks very much. Best,
Propose a subject line
A: Fixing the Direct Access Prohibition
Here is an email: Mr. Lay: I appreciate the time you took to review my memo concerning internal communications suggestions. Cindy Olson called to thank me and Sarah Davis did meet with me to discuss the memo. I have some ideas regarding the transition and would like to share them with you and/or your communication transition team. Could you please put me in contact with your team handling the communications for the transition or meet with me personally to discuss? I would only take a few minutes of your time. Thank you again for your time and all that you have done for us. You have a large following that are here to support you and Enron. We just need direction from the top, more importantly, you.
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A:
Transition