Q: CHAPTER XXXVIII

"Speak not of niceness, when there's chance of wreck," The captain said, as ladies writhed their neck To see the dying dolphin flap the deck: "If we go down, on us these gentry sup; We dine upon them, if we haul them up. Wise men applaud us when we eat the eaters, As the devil laughs when keen folks cheat the cheaters." --THE SEA VOYAGE.

There was nothing in Duke's manner towards Christian which could have conveyed to that latter personage, experienced as he was in the worst possible ways of the world, that Buckingham would, at that particular moment, rather have seen the devil than himself; unless it was that Buckingham's reception of him, being rather extraordinarily courteous towards so old an acquaintance, might have excited some degree of suspicion.

Having escaped with some difficulty from the vague region of general compliments, which bears the same relation to that of business that Milton informs us the _Limbo Patrum_ has to the sensible and material earth, Christian asked his Grace of Buckingham, with the same blunt plainness with which he usually veiled a very deep and artificial character, whether he had lately seen Chiffinch or his helpmate?

"Neither of them lately," answered Buckingham. "Have not you waited on them yourself?--I thought you would have been more anxious about the great scheme."

"I have called once and again," said Christian, "but I can gain no access to the sight of that important couple. I begin to be afraid they are paltering with me."

1. yes
2. Christian
3. whether he had seen Chiffinch or his helpmate?
4. his Grace of Buckingham
5. Yes
6. dolphin
7. the deck
8. Wise men
9. the devil
10. Christian
11. No
12. No
13. Milton

Numbered questions:
1. did someone ask something?
2. who?
3. what?
4. who did he ask?
5. was something losing it's life?
6. what?
7. where?
8. who claps?
9. who laughed?
10. who was looking for a couple?
11. did he find them?
12. was someone extra polite?
13. who informed?

input: Make use of the article to answer the questions. Google Maps is a web mapping service developed by Google. It offers satellite imagery, street maps, 360 panoramic views of streets (Street View), real-time traffic conditions (Google Traffic), and route planning for traveling by foot, car, bicycle (in beta), or public transportation.

Google Maps began as a C++ desktop program designed by Lars and Jens Eilstrup Rasmussen at Where 2 Technologies. In October 2004, the company was acquired by Google, which converted it into a web application. After additional acquisitions of a geospatial data visualization company and a realtime traffic analyzer, Google Maps was launched in February 2005. The service's front end utilizes JavaScript, XML, and Ajax. Google Maps offers an API that allows maps to be embedded on third-party websites, and offers a locator for urban businesses and other organizations in numerous countries around the world. Google Map Maker allowed users to collaboratively expand and update the service's mapping worldwide but was discontinued from March, 2017. However crowdsourced contributions to Google Maps are not ending as the company announced those features will be transferred to Google's Local Guides programme.

Google Maps' satellite view is a "top-down" or "birds eye" view; most of the high-resolution imagery of cities is aerial photography taken from aircraft flying at , while most other imagery is from satellites. Much of the available satellite imagery is no more than three years old and is updated on a regular basis. Google Maps uses a close variant of the Mercator projection, and therefore cannot accurately show areas around the poles. 1. What is Google Maps?
2. When was it acquired?
3. From whom?
4. Who designed it?
5. What did it start as?
6. When did Google launch it?
7. As what kind of app?
8. What was canceled in 2017?
9. Where will it be transferred to?
10. Where do they get most of their images from?
11. Where is the other from?
12. What kind of view do they use?
13. How old is the images?
14. Are they updated regularly?
15. What projection do they use?
16. what programming language do they use?
17. Can you get routes for a bike?
18. Where is it not good for?
19. Does it let you know about wrecks?
20. How about trains?
numbered_answers: 1. a web mapping service
2. October 2004
3. Where 2 Technologies
4. Lars and Jens Eilstrup Rasmussen
5. a C++ desktop program
6. February 2005
7. a web application
8. Google Map Maker
9. Local Guides
10. satellites
11. aircraft
12. aerial
13. no more than three years
14. yes
15. a close variant of the Mercator projection
16. JavaScript, XML, and Ajax
17. yes
18. areas around the poles
19. yes
20. yes

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- A convicted rapist seeking to prove his innocence with a new DNA test lost his appeal Thursday at the Supreme Court.

The U.S. Supreme Court case involved a crime in which post-conviction DNA testing was available.

The justices ruled 5-4 that inmates cannot use a federal civil rights law to press for advanced DNA testing that was unavailable at the time of the crime.

Forty-four states and the federal government have laws allowing post-conviction access to biological evidence for such testing, but that number does not include Alaska, where William Osborne was sentenced 15 years ago for a vicious attack on an Anchorage woman.

"He has no constitutional right to obtain post-conviction access to the state's evidence for DNA testing," Chief Justice John Roberts wrote for the majority. He was supported by his conservative colleagues Justices Antonin Scalia, Anthony Kennedy, Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito.

In dissent, Justice John Paul Stevens said, "There is no reason to deny access to the evidence and there are many reasons to provide it, not the least of which is a fundamental concern in ensuring that justice has been done in this case." Justices David Souter, Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Stephen Breyer backed his conclusions.

Osborne's trial attorney in Anchorage made a strategic decision 16 years ago to forgo more sophisticated DNA testing of the evidence in the criminal assault case, believing it might end up working against her client. Several years later, the Alaska inmate sought access to the state's biological evidence to have a state-of-the-art DNA test done. What are the answers to this following set of questions: 1. Where was someone in jail?
2. He was there for what?
3. How long ago?
4. What was his name?
5. What doesn't the state allow?
6. Is that true for the whole country?
7. Where is it allowed?
8. Where was he trying to have it changed?
9. What institution was he trying to get to change it?
10. Did they?
11. By what margin?
12. Who is someone that said it shouldn't be changed?
13. What's his title?
14. Who is someone who thought it should be changed?
Answer:
1. Alaska
2. rape
3. 15 years ago
4. William Osborne
5. post conviction access to biological evidence
6. no
7. Forty-four states and the federal government
8. in Anchorage
9. Supreme Court.
10. no
11. 5-4
12. John Roberts
13. Chief Justice
14. Paul Stevens