The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the self-need strategy, otherwise output No. self-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to create a personal need for an item in the negotiation, such as by pointing out that the participant sweats a lot to show preference towards water packages.

Q: Context: 'Can i kindly know your preferences please?' 'Well, I'm kind of low on water, so I'd like to get as much of that as I can. I'd like to go hiking and I don't really have enough water for a long trip. What about you?' 'Ohh nice.I also have the same issue around here.The thirst for water is growing high than ever due to drought'
Utterance: 'Well, that's a bummer. How are you set for food? While I wouldn't mind a bit more, I'm in pretty good shape there, so I'd be willing to trade it for water. I'd hate to leave without getting a good hike in.'

A: Yes
****
Q: Context: 'I'm thinking I'l get 2 firewood, and 2 water and 1 food. I'm not sure what you need, but we can figure it out. ' 'my highest priority is water, i need it to stay hydrated from the camping beers' 'Who doesn't? I need more wood. I'm skinny. I get cold easily. Beer hidrates dude 🙂'
Utterance: 'ha no prob on the wood, its out there in nature so i can do with less of it hows 3 water, 1 food, 0 wood sound'

A: No
****
Q: Context: 'no its not i give you i water i get 1 food and 1 firewood' 'We only have 3 of each to divide up.. so yes, you're going to have to give me one more on an item.. but in exchange I'm giving you 1 more on two different items. I'm getting 4 items in total, you're getting 5.. - You're essentially netting 11% more 'items' than I am in this deal. ' 'thats the point as you need water so badly'
Utterance: 'Correct.. I do.. but if you're not willing to budge on this where you're still netting more overall value I understand - I'm bummed but I understand.'

A:
No
****