Question: Sentence A: It is indeed scarcely wider than a sword slash, crossed by a miniature iron suspension bridge brought from Scotland and portered in at the turn of the century.

Sentence B: Since the bridge replaced the pre-existing wooden bridge, there have been no accidents.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question: Unless emergency medicine staff with an interest in integrating alcohol treatment services into emergency care assume greater prominence and leadership in their field, effecting change within this specialty will be slow and uneven.
Changing how the ED operates will be easy.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Problem: Here is a premise:
The patterns, of course, are well established.

Here is a hypothesis:
The patterns have deep roots, said the psychologist.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Sentence 1: Then he was gone.

Sentence 2: He wasn't there anymore.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: yes

Question:
Whatever your beliefs about the formal obstruction of justice case against Clinton, Lewinsky clearly intuited that her mendacity would please the president.

Does it follow that "Lewinsky and Clinton never actually met."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
no

Question:
Based on the premise "Those then who controvert the principle that the constitution is to be considered, in court, as a paramount law, are reduced to the necessity of maintaining that courts must close their eyes on the constitution, and see only the law.", can we conclude that "This controverting is a common occurrence in court."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
it is not possible to tell