Problem: Here is a premise:
In cases where LSC counsel were attorneys of record, there would be lingering doubt whether the truncated representation had resulted in complete analysis of the case, full advice to the client, and proper presentation to the court.

Here is a hypothesis:
LSC counsel were never the attorneys of record.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Sentence 1: I dunno, Sergeant.

Sentence 2: The Sergeant shouted at the person who didn't know.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question:
Prior indiscretion(s): Adultery.

Does it follow that "Adultery was a prior indiscretion. "?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
yes

Q: If At 15 cents per protest, smoking is a cheap ticket to danger., can we say that "Smoking can be fined"?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A: yes

Premise:
"For the treatment and all follow up care, one could pay in easy month-and-half installments spread over 25 to 45 years."
Hypothesis: One could stretch out the payments for the treatment and follow up care over 25 to 45 years.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

yes

Sentence 1: I'm thinking."

Sentence 2: I am thinking.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer:
yes