Here is a premise:
Knowing the basis on which the case instances were selected, for example, is crucial in cumulation; otherwise it is not possible to know whether best case, worst case, typical, or the like instances are being aggregated.

Here is a hypothesis:
There are many cases that were selected through out the history of looking over the cases.

Is it possible to conclude that if the premise is true, then so is the hypothesis?
it is not possible to tell