In this task, you are given text for US Congressional and California state bills, your task is to generate a summary for this bill.

Example input: SECTION 1. LIABILITY OF BUSINESS ENTITIES PROVIDING USE OF FACILITIES
TO NONPROFIT ORGANIZATIONS.

(a) Definitions.--In this section:
(1) Business entity.--The term ''business entity'' means a
firm, corporation, association, partnership, consortium, joint
venture, or other form of enterprise.
(2) Facility.--The term ''facility'' means any real
property, including any building, improvement, or appurtenance.
(3) Gross negligence.--The term ''gross negligence'' means
voluntary and conscious conduct by a person with knowledge (at
the time of the conduct) that the conduct is likely to be
harmful to the health or well-being of another person.
(4) Intentional misconduct.--The term ''intentional
misconduct'' means conduct by a person with knowledge (at the
time of the conduct) that the conduct is harmful to the health
or well-being of another person.
(5) Nonprofit organization.--The term ''nonprofit
organization'' means--
(A) any organization described in section 501(c)(3)
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and exempt from
tax under section 501(a) of such Code; or
(B) any not-for-profit organization organized and
conducted for public benefit and operated primarily for
charitable, civic, educational, religious, welfare, or
health purposes.
(6) State.--The term ''State'' means each of the several
States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto
Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, the Northern
Mariana Islands, any other territory or possession of the
United States, or any political subdivision of any such State,
territory, or possession.
(b) Limitation on Liability.--
(1) In general.--Subject to subsection (c), a business
entity shall not be subject to civil liability relating to any
injury or death occurring at a facility of the business entity
in connection with a use of such facility by a nonprofit
organization if--
(A) the use occurs outside of the scope of business
of the business entity;
(B) such injury or death occurs during a period
that such facility is used by the nonprofit
organization; and
(C) the business entity authorized the use of such
facility by the nonprofit organization.
(2) Application.--This subsection shall apply--
(A) with respect to civil liability under Federal
and State law; and
(B) regardless of whether a nonprofit organization
pays for the use of a facility.
(c) Exception for Liability.--Subsection (b) shall not apply to an
injury or death that results from an act or omission of a business
entity that constitutes gross negligence or intentional misconduct,
including any misconduct that--
(1) constitutes a crime of violence (as that term is
defined in section 16 of title 18, United States Code) or act
of international terrorism (as that term is defined in section
2331 of title 18) for which the defendant has been convicted in
any court;
(2) constitutes a hate crime (as that term is used in the
Hate Crime Statistics Act (28 U.S.C. 534 note));
(3) involves a sexual offense, as defined by applicable
State law, for which the defendant has been convicted in any
court; or
(4) involves misconduct for which the defendant has been
found to have violated a Federal or State civil rights law.
(d) Superseding Provision.--
(1) In general.--Subject to paragraph (2) and subsection
(e), this Act preempts the laws of any State to the extent that
such laws are inconsistent with this Act, except that this Act
shall not preempt any State law that provides additional
protection from liability for a business entity for an injury
or death with respect to which conditions under subparagraphs
(A) through (C) of subsection (b)(1) apply.
(2) Limitation.--Nothing in this Act shall be construed to
supersede any Federal or State health or safety law.
(e) Election of State Regarding Nonapplicability.--This Act shall
not apply to any civil action in a State court against a business
entity in which all parties are citizens of the State if such State
enacts a statute--
(1) citing the authority of this subsection;
(2) declaring the election of such State that this Act
shall not apply to such civil action in the State; and
(3) containing no other provision.
Example output: Shields a business entity from civil liability relating to any injury or death occurring at a facility of that entity in connection with a use of such facility by a nonprofit organization if: (1) the use occurs outside the scope of business of the business entity; (2) such injury or death occurs during a period that such facility is used by such organization; and (3) the business entity authorized the use of such facility by the organization.
Makes this Act inapplicable to an injury or death that results from an act or omission of a business entity that constitutes gross negligence or intentional misconduct, including misconduct that: (1) constitutes a hate crime or a crime of violence or act of international terrorism for which the defendant has been convicted in any court; or (2) involves a sexual offense for which the defendant has been convicted in any court or misconduct for which the defendant has been found to have violated a Federal or State civil rights law.
Preempts State laws to the extent that such laws are inconsistent with this Act, except State law that provides additional protection from liability. Specifies that this Act shall not be construed to supersede any Federal or State health or safety law.
Makes this Act inapplicable to any civil action in a State court against a business entity in which all parties are citizens of the State if such State, citing this Act's authority and containing no other provision, enacts a statute declaring the State's election that this Act shall not apply to such action in the State.
Example explanation: This Bill focuses on shielding business entities from civil liability relating to an injury or death depending on the conditions of injury, hence the generated summary is correct.
Q: SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ''Dungeness Crab Conservation and
Management Act''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS AND PURPOSES.

(a) Findings.--Congress finds that--
(1) the ocean Dungeness crab (Cancer magister) fishery
adjacent to the States of Washington, Oregon, and California
has been successfully conserved and managed by those States
since the 19th century;
(2) in recognition of the need for coastwide conservation
of Dungeness crab, the States of Washington, Oregon, and
California have--
(A) enacted certain laws that promote conservation
of the resource;
(B) signed a memorandum of understanding declaring
the intent of those States to take mutually supportive
actions to further the management of Dungeness crab;
and
(C) through the Pacific States Marine Fisheries
Commission, formed the Tri-State Dungeness Crab
Committee to provide a public forum for coordinating
conservation and management actions;
(3) tribal treaty rights to crab under the subproceeding
numbered 89-3 in United States v. Washington, D.C. No. CV-70-
09213, are being implemented by the State of Washington through
annual preseason negotiations with the affected Indian tribes;
(4) the expiration of interim authority referred to in
paragraph (7) will jeopardize the ability of the State to
effectively provide for State-tribal harvest agreements that
include restrictions on nontreaty fishers in the exclusive
economic zone;
(5) the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and
Management Act (16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.) requires that Federal
fishery management plans be established for fisheries that
require conservation and management;
(6) under the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and
Management Act, several fisheries in the Atlantic and Pacific
Oceans, including king crab in the Gulf of Alaska, have
remained under the jurisdiction of individual States or
interstate organizations because conservation and management
can be better achieved without the implementation of a Federal
fishery management plan;
(7) section 112(d) of the Sustainable Fisheries Act (Public
Law 104-297; 110 Stat. 3596 though 3597) provided interim
authority for the States of Washington, Oregon, and California
to exercise limited jurisdiction over the ocean Dungeness crab
fishery in the exclusive economic zone and required the Pacific
Fishery Management Council to report to Congress on progress in
developing a fishery management plan for ocean Dungeness crab
and any impediments to that progress;
(8) the Pacific Fishery Management Council diligently
carried out the responsibilities referred to in paragraph (7)
by holding public hearings, requesting recommendations from a
committee of that Council and the Tri-State Dungeness Crab
Committee;
(9) representatives from the Indian tribes involved, the
west coast Dungeness crab industry, and the fishery management
agencies of the States of Washington, Oregon, and California
were consulted by the Pacific Fishery Management Council, and
the Council voted in public session on its final report; and
(10) by a unanimous vote, the Pacific Fishery Management
Council found that amending section 112 of the Sustainable
Fisheries Act and providing for permanent authority to the
States of Washington, Oregon, and California to manage, with
certain limitations, the ocean Dungeness crab fishery in that
portion of the exclusive economic zone adjacent to each of the
States, respectively, and continued participation by fishermen
and the Indian tribes subject to the tribal treaty rights
referred to in paragraph (3) would--
(A) best accomplish the conservation and management
of the ocean Dungeness crab fishery; and
(B) best serve the public interest.
(b) Purposes.--The purposes of this Act are--
(1) to provide for the continued conservation and
management of ocean Dungeness crab in a manner that recognizes
the contributions of the States of Washington, Oregon, and
California and the needs of the Indian tribes that are subject
to the tribal treaty rights to crab described in subsection
(a)(3); and
(2) to carry out the recommendations that the Pacific
Fishery Management Council made in accordance with requirements
established by Congress.

SEC. 3. DEFINITIONS.

In this Act:
(1) Exclusive economic zone.--The term ''exclusive economic
zone'' has the meaning given that term in section 3(11) of the
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (16
U.S.C. 1802(11)).
(2) Fishery.--The term ''fishery'' has the meaning given
that term in section 3(13) of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Management Act (16 U.S.C. 1802(13)).
(3) Fishing.--The term ''fishing'' has the meaning given
that term in section 3(15) of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act (16 U.S.C. 1802(15)).

SEC. 4. AUTHORITY FOR MANAGEMENT OF DUNGENESS CRAB.

(a) In General.--Subject to the provisions of this section, and
notwithstanding section 306(a) of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act (16 U.S.C. 1856(a)), each of the States
of Washington, Oregon, and California may adopt and enforce State laws
(including regulations) governing fishing and processing in the
exclusive economic zone adjacent to that State in any Dungeness crab
(Cancer magister) fishery for which there is no fishery management plan
in effect under the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and
Management Act (16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.).
(b) Requirements for State Laws.--Any law adopted by a State under
this section for a Dungeness crab fishery--
(1) except as provided in paragraph (2), shall, without
regard to the State that issued the permit under which a vessel
is operating, apply equally to--
(A) vessels engaged in the fishery in the exclusive
economic zone; and
(B) vessels engaged in the fishery in the waters of
the State;
(2) shall not apply to any fishing by a vessel in the
exercise of tribal treaty rights; and
(3) shall include any provisions necessary to implement
tribal treaty rights in a manner consistent with the decision
of the United States District Court for the Western District of
Washington in United States v. Washington, D.C. No. CV-70-
09213.
(c) Exclusive Economic Zone.--
(1) In general.--Subject to paragraph (2), any law of the
State of Washington, Oregon, or California that establishes or
implements a limited entry system for a Dungeness crab fishery
may not be enforced against a vessel that--
(A) is otherwise legally fishing in the exclusive
economic zone adjacent to that State; and
(B) is not registered under the laws of that State.
(2) Exclusion.--A State referred to in paragraph (1) may
regulate the landing of Dungeness crab.
(d) Requirements for Harvest.--No vessel may harvest or process
Dungeness crab in the exclusive economic zone adjacent to the State of
Washington, Oregon, or California, except--
(1) as authorized by a permit issued by any of the States
referred to in subsection (c)(1); or
(2) under any tribal treaty rights to Dungeness crab in a
manner consistent with the decision of the United States
District Court for the Western District of Washington in United
States v. Washington, D.C. No. CV-70-09213.
(e) Statutory Construction.--Except as expressly provided in this
section, nothing in this section is intended to reduce the authority of
any State under the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and
Management Act (16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.) to regulate fishing, fish
processing, or landing of fish.

SEC. 5. ELIMINATION OF INTERIM AUTHORITY.

Section 112 of the Sustainable Fisheries Act (Public Law 104-297;
110 Stat. 3596) is amended by striking subsection (d).
A:
Dungeness Crab Conservation and Management Act - Authorizes each of the States of Washington, Oregon, and California to adopt and enforce laws and regulations governing fishing and processing in the exclusive economic zone (EEZ) adjacent to that State in any Dungeness crab fishery for which there is no management plan in effect under the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act. Prohibits harvesting or processing Dungeness crab in the EEZ adjacent to those States except as authorized by a permit issued by any of those States or under certain tribal rights. Removes related interim authority provisions of the Sustainable Fisheries Act.