Teacher:In this task, you must classify if a given review is positive/negative, indicating your answer as P or N.
Teacher: Now, understand the problem? Solve this instance: i have nothing against unabashedly romantic films .
when done right , with at least slightly evident restraint , they can be engaging , sweeping , appealing .
but it 's a hell of a shame when someone botches it as badly as nora ephron botched sleepless in seattle ,
a hollow , boring romance that should appeal only to the most gullible of viewers ; the ones willing to buy into ephron 's whiny views of life and romance .
tom hanks and meg ryan , two of hollywood 's most likeable stars play sam baldwin and annie reed , repectively .
baldwin 's wife recently died and he moved to seattle with his son , jonah , seeking to get away from the familiar surroundings which remind him of his late spouse .
jonah senses tension and calls a talk radio show to tell the world about their problems .
sam seems ready to strangle his son for calling the show , but when he gets on the phone he begins pouring his heart out .
ephron has him do this so that annie reed ( meg ryan ) can hear it .
annie is a happy woman .
she is engaged to walter , an allergy - prone working man and seems to be perfectly content .
but after hearing sam the widower on the radio show , she becomes convinced that he is her destiny and is willing to risk her engagement for it .
five years after this movie hit theaters , hanks , ryan and ephron would team up again in the far better , although still sub - par romantic comedy you 've got mail , which is about people who hate each other in real life falling in love on the internet .
at least that movie had a sense of spontaneity .
here it seems that the first one hundred minutes exist solely to set up for the last five .
the fact that sam and annie will finally meet is so excruciatingly obvious that everything else is perfunctory .
sleepless in seattle is full of wonderful performers ; from its two leads to supporting stars like bill pullman and rosie o'donnell . but none of them can save the film from being a bore .
its characters are dull and empty , its script is n't funny or particularly charming .
the script has a fundamental problem : annie gives up , for little reason , her life with walter to pursue " sleepless in seattle , " whom she has never even seen .
it 's the kind of life decision that real people do n't make , and its a major , unforgivable plausibility sacrifice .
in essence , this movie 's purpose is to head towards a goal that should n't even exist .
it 's a ten minute short film with ninety - five minutes of filler .
if you were to show me sleepless in seattle and i did n't have to review it , you could just call me " asleep in philadelphia . " ?
1999 eugene novikov&#137 ;
Student:
N