In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

[Q]: Comment: This topic must be expanded beyond "clergy sex abuse" to abuse of all kinds by clergy. There are priests who engage in patterns of verbal and emotional abuse which are just as damaging to the victims, and if the victims report the treatment, they are ridiculed, intimidated and manipulated to keep silent by those in authority over these abusers, who go merrily on their way, thinking, "As long as I'm not caught in bed with a woman, or a man, or looking at porn on a computer, nothing will happen." They behave like spoiled children, and those in authority enable and protect them.
[A]: Sexual-explicit

[Q]: Comment: Finishing up here, the underlying problem I see is that either through direct coordination with the Clinton campaign (thank you Wikileaks), or through a desire to drive up ratings/profits, the mainstream media has been taking many of Trump's words out of context and intentionally stoking fear and racism across party lines for the past year. At the same time, any stories about HRC's actual racism, like having the young woman removed by security at a press conference when she dared to ask about the "super predator" comment from the 90s, were completely buried. Now that Trump has been elected, the media is going into overdrive to drive people apart. Quick to blame Trump, blame some absurd Russian conspiracy theory, cast al his supporters as racist and ignorant, but dont talk about real policy issues. Dont talk about widespread police abuse, make it about race. Dont talk about widespread poverty, make it about race. Dont talk about lost jobs across the board, make it about race.
[A]: Non-sexual-explicit

[Q]: Comment: Ask yourself what would happen if men changed their minds.
[A]:
Non-sexual-explicit