In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: insult and non-insult. Insult is any lanugage or act that is disrespectful or scornfully abusive.

Comment: Here's the real scoop, people.

Many, many commenters--and the Loyal Opposition right now (wow: 2nd day in a row!) --talking up a storm about how/when/if/who in America is enraged/upset/shocked/concerned about the Norsat sale initiating a supposed huge breach of security.

Is it true? Is it false? Is it real? Is it fiction?

Here is how we will know: when the Washington Post or NY Times has a front page headline that says something like, "WHITEHOUSE ENRAGED OVER CANADIAN SECURITY BREACH" or "CANADIAN GOVT. ENDANGERS U.S. MILITARY SECURITY."

When we see that, we will know that at least:
1. American politicians know about this.
2. The White House administrate/Pentagon got its act together to actually declare something.
3. Washington takes Norsat deal seriously.

Now, can we all go back to the important business of:
1. Worrying about hordes of refugees border jumpers endangering our future
2. Wondering if $62 billion is enough/will ever be committed to our own military
Non-insult