Question: Sentence A: yeah yeah i heard about um is is there true that there's a if a lawyer takes a a case to court and it's what do they call it um frivolous is that is there still a frivolous law that they can

Sentence B: If there is a frivolous law, then lawyers shouldn't be wasting the court's time.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question: the very first thing i i should look at huh
I'm closing my eyes because I don't have to look at anything,
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Problem: Here is a premise:
Also, much of the information maintained by federal agencies, although unclassified, is extremely sensitive, and many automated operations are attractive targets for individuals or organizations with malicious intentions, such as committing fraud for personal gain or sabotaging federal operations.

Here is a hypothesis:
A lot of information is maintained by federal agencies and is sensitive so it should be protected properly.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Sentence 1: it probably changed my political views it changed my understanding of the world around me

Sentence 2: My political views were changed.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: yes

Question:
yeah but you know i also like the the fast food places like Taco Bell because you can get a lot of food for cheap prices

Does it follow that "I hate any kind of fast food restaurants like Taco Bell and Burgers' King."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
no

Question:
Based on the premise "but then America always has been for the immigrant", can we conclude that "America had always been available for immigrants."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
yes