Question:
For simplicity, consider a married couple in which neither spouse is covered by an employer-sponsored pension plan and each contributes $2,000-the maximum per person per year allowed under current law-to a traditional IRA.

Does it follow that "$7,000-the maximum contribution per person per year is allowed."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
no

Q: If they those have been real popular with my family i've had them calling up and saying will you make me another one and, can we say that "Family members have not liked them, I have not had any repeat orders."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A: no

Premise:
"but i i did read the book i have do have i have six years of college so i did read and study about the Vietnam War though so i am pretty familiar you know i'm more familiar with it than"
Hypothesis: I studied the Vietnam War when I was at college.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

yes

input question: Is this satire, or does Bertolucci really mean to suggest a higher communion? If this premise is true, does that tell us:"The author thinks that Bertolucci doesn't really mean to suggest a higher communion."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: yes

Question:
Based on the premise "A boat cruise on the Seine is one of the best introductions to the city.", can we conclude that "There are different approaches to introducing one's self to the city."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
yes

input question: 7 billion would be incurred slaughtering at-risk cattle culled to prevent BSE spread, and that costs of $593 million would be incurred imposing feed regulations at the time BSE was detected. If this premise is true, does that tell us:"The slaughtering of cattle was needed to reduce the risks."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer:
it is not possible to tell