input question: The key to accumulating wealth for retirement is simply the choice to save, although investment choices also matter. If this premise is true, does that tell us:"If one wants to accumulate wealth for retirement, one should neither save nor invest."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: no

Question:
Based on the premise "right yeah i i spend a lot of time down in Charlotte uh and on their just the the regular TV not cable you can pick up four PB or three PBS channels", can we conclude that "In my experience Charlotte only has over the air TV stations and no cable."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
yes

Question: Sentence A: It is possible to emphasize this topic without stating that it should take precedence over other issues or have a certain amount of resources devoted to it.

Sentence B: The statement is emphasized.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Question: Under these programs, employees can obtain cash awards based on savings they can document by using free tickets from airline frequent flyer programs or by securing lodging rates below the maximum amounts allowed.
Savings for employees can be obtained through undocumented travel.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Problem: Here is a premise:
besides routine oil changes i guess that was about the uh the last last major thing that we've had done to the car

Here is a hypothesis:
We do the oil changes ourselves.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question:
sure oh really well i guess being from that part of the country

Does it follow that "No, regardless of being from anywhere."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
no