Categorize the comment on the basis of obscenity. If the comment is obscene output Yes, otherwise output No.

Example Input: Besides being the aloha state...we are a state of islands. Consider that tourism with their low paying service industry jobs, construction, military stipends for rentals, and present GET contribute and advance homelessness in the aloha state.

20+ years ago I worked with the homeless. Many were mentally ill and/ or addicted. Now today's homeless include families. Outreach is about aloha (ha and fortitude) and relationship. We all know the issue is affordable permanent housing. Perhaps...the reluctance of homeless families to move into a temporary shelter is that they don't see a long term plan of possibilities.
Example Output: No

Example Input: No monkeying around with a motor fuel tax. We pay enough as it is.
Example Output: No

Example Input: House members do not have to rush to vote on Walker and Co.'s permanent fund dividend scheme that discourages efforts and removes pressures for further cost-cutting measures to our unsustainable state salaries and budget.

According to an article on today's S&P release that was conveniently timed for next week's House of Reps deliberations to SB 128, "Despite the budget deficit, S&P said Alaska continues to have very strong credit quality due to the large reserves it built up over times when oil prices were high."

As was suggested by another columnist - take the time to do it right during next legislative session.
Example Output:
No