Categorize the comment on the basis of toxicity. If the comment is toxic (harmful, malicious, derogatory, threat, insult, identity attck, etc.) output Yes, otherwise output No.

[Q]: Michael Bloomberg is watching the Trump and Bernie clown cars. If Bloomberg enters the Presidential race there will be another choice available.

But beware--if Bloomberg wins a state or two, and no one gets the necessary electoral votes to be the President, the Republican House of Representatives gets to choose the new president. They can choose anyone they they please.
[A]: No

[Q]: I've never understood how a person pledges blind support to a political party, because in reality they don't care about you in any form what so ever.

I rarely find myself agreeing with the Republican Party on any issue, same thing with the Democrat Party. Look at Juneau, every single elected representative deserves to be thrown out. But it will never happen because voters, no matter how much they complain, don't want to give up a single thing.

Look at the outcry over freezing state employees pay, you would think that some are going to be forced into poverty by the reactions. Same with ending corporate welfare to oil companies, or the state subsidizing GCI's profits. People act like by ending, or at least scaling back the amount, is going to make the state fail.

We are going to be in a world of hurt because of people who cling to their own self interests.
[A]: No

[Q]: What BS!! If there are crimes involved, get on with the trial. There will eventually be civil lawsuits, so get on with them asap. The people who had damage to their properties are already getting screwed by the borough as far as valuations (and therefore, taxes) are concerned. Now it appears as if the State is going to mess with these people, too, by lessening the crimes and punishments these irresponsible idiots committed. Disgusting! So much for the State watching out for innocent citizens!
[A]:
Yes