Given the task definition, example input & output, solve the new input case.
In this task, you must classify if a given review is positive/negative, indicating your answer as P or N.
Example: plot : two teen couples go to a church party , drink and then drive .
they get into an accident .
one of the guys dies , but his girlfriend continues to see him in her life , and has nightmares .
what 's the deal ?
watch the movie and " sorta " find out . . .
critique : a mind - fuck movie for the teen generation that touches on a very cool idea , but presents it in a very bad package .
which is what makes this review an even harder one to write , since i generally applaud films which attempt to break the mold , mess with your head and such ( lost highway & memento ) , but there are good and bad ways of making all types of films , and these folks just did n't snag this one correctly
.
they seem to have taken this pretty neat concept , but executed it terribly .
so what are the problems with the movie ?
well , its main problem is that it 's simply too jumbled
.
it starts off " normal " but then downshifts into this " fantasy " world in which you , as an audience member ,
have no idea what 's going on
.
there are dreams , there are characters coming back from the dead , there are others who look like the dead , there are strange apparitions , there are disappearances , there are a looooot of chase scenes , there are tons of weird things that happen , and most of it is simply not explained .
now i personally do n't mind trying to unravel a film every now and then , but when all it does is give me the same clue over and over again , i get kind of fed up after a while , which is this film 's biggest problem .
it 's obviously got this big secret to hide , but it seems to want to hide it completely until its final five minutes .
and do they make things entertaining , thrilling or even engaging , in the meantime ?
not really .
the sad part is that the arrow and i both dig on flicks like this , so we actually figured most of it out by the half - way point , so all of the strangeness after that did start to make a little bit of sense , but it still did n't the make the film all that more entertaining .
i guess the bottom line with movies like this is that you should always make sure that the audience is " into it " even before they are given the secret password to enter your world of understanding .
i mean , showing melissa sagemiller running away from visions for about 20 minutes throughout the movie is just plain lazy ! !
okay , we get it .
. .
there are people chasing her and we do n't know who they are .
do we really need to see it over and over again ?
how about giving us different scenes offering further insight into all of the strangeness going down in the movie ?
apparently , the studio took this film away from its director and chopped it up themselves , and it shows .
there might 've been a pretty decent teen mind - fuck movie in here somewhere , but i guess " the suits " decided that turning it into a music video with little edge , would make more sense .
the actors are pretty good for the most part , although wes bentley just seemed to be playing the exact same character that he did in american beauty , only in a new neighborhood .
but my biggest kudos go out to sagemiller , who holds her own throughout the entire film , and actually has you feeling her character 's unraveling .
overall , the film does n't stick
because it does n't entertain , it 's confusing , it rarely excites and
it feels pretty redundant for most of its runtime , despite a pretty cool ending and explanation to all of the craziness that came before it .
oh ,
and by the way , this is not a horror or teen slasher flick . . .
it 's just packaged to look that way because someone is apparently assuming that the genre is still hot with the kids .
it also wrapped production two years ago and has been sitting on the shelves ever since .
whatever . .
. skip it !
where 's joblo coming from ?
a nightmare of elm street 3 ( 7/10 ) - blair witch 2 ( 7/10 ) - the crow ( 9/10 ) - the crow : salvation ( 4/10 )
- lost highway ( 10/10 ) - memento ( 10/10 ) - the others ( 9/10 ) - stir of echoes ( 8/10 )
Output: N
The phrases used in the review convey a negative sentiment (e.g. "presents it in a very bad package").

New input case for you: after sixteen years francis ford copolla has again returned to his favorite project , making the third installment in the godfather - trilogy .
this new film has been underrated for no reason .
it is as intellectual and majestically made
as copolla 's pervious films .
it is also more psychological , pessimistic and more tragic than the first two .
the only regret is the unconvincing performance by the newcomer sofia copolla and some " unfinished " developments of some characters .
the film elegantly begins with nino rota 's recognizable musical score , the beautiful skyscrapers of new york and michael 's voice as he is writing a letter to his children : " the only wealth in this world is children .
more than all money and power on earth , you are my treasure " .
the year is 1979 and michael corleone has used the time since the ending of " part ii " to make his father 's dream come true - making the corleone family legitimate .
michael sold all his casinos and invests only in gambling .
constantly haunted by the past , his only reason to live is his children .
the family has amassed unimaginable wealth , and as the film opens michael corleone ( al pacino ) is being invested with a great honor by the church .
later that day , at a reception , his daughter announces a corleone family gift to the church and the charities of sicily , " a check in the amount of $ 100 million .
"
but the corleones are about to find , as others have throughout history , that you can not buy forgiveness .
sure , you can do business with evil men inside the church , for all men are fallible and capable of sin .
but god does not take payoffs .
the plot of the movie , concocted by coppola and mario puzo in a screenplay inspired by headlines , brings the corleone family into the inner circles of corruption in the vatican .
there is a moment in " godfather iii " where michael says : " all my life i have been trying to go up in society , where everything was legal .
but the higher i go , the crookier it becomes . . " .
visually this film is as spectacular as the first two .
gordon willis ' rich cinematography , carmine copolla 's beautiful composition and alex tavoularis ' wonderful art direction could not be better .
but copolla 's first two godfather - films were more famous for their deep , intellectual plots , tree dimensional characters and incredible acting , than for their visual perfection .
the third installment has only the plot and visuals .
some characters could be much more developed and the acting , although good , never accomplishes to reach the same height of the first two films .
the biggest miscasting is sofia copolla , who is so unconvincing and unemotional that she manages to ruin several scenes throughout the movie , that could have been grander and more emotional .
the best performance comes unsurprisingly from al pacino , who should have got a nomination for best actor at the oscars .
andy garcia is powerful as sonny 's son , strong , focused and loyal .
violence is natural to him .
he suffers no pangs of conscience when he takes revenge on his family 's behalf , and in this he is supposed to be strong in the uncomplicated way don vito corleone was .
however both kay ( diane keaton ) and connie ( talia shire ) are useless .
and characters like vito corleone and tom hagen are really missed .
the good part is that michael is again reunited with old friends , that you remember from the first and second films .
in the third film michael has become almost like his father , vito in the first film and vincenzo resembles michael when he was much younger .
this parallel could be more interesting if vincenzo 's character was more developed .
many have pointed out that making the third film , was unnecessary .
i disagree .
it is a beautiful film of great importance , completing the tragic saga of the corleone family .
the first film showed some horrible results of corleone 's life .
it showed michael making a choice ; the second showed a man damning himself for his choices and feeling the impact of changing times .
a man desperately trying to keep his balance , focus , family and sanity , while everything is crashing all around him .
the third film is a terrifying conclusion - a result of michael 's life .
the life he chose for himself is like quicksand - one wrong step and you are doomed .
there is no turning back .
and no matter how hard you try to get out of it , to free yourself , no matter how powerful and wealthy you are , you are helpless - sinking deeper and deeper till it swallows you completely .
the beautifully directed last sequence is also the powerful climax of the film , when michael is sitting alone in his chair , left by everyone , surrounded by emptiness and memories of his friends and family members long dead .
here he dies - alone , miserable and unforgiven
Output:
P