Teacher: In this task, you are given a part of an article. Your task is to generate headline (title) for this text. Preferred headlines are under fifteen words.
Teacher: Now, understand the problem? If you are still confused, see the following example:
We propose a local coherence model based on a convolutional neural network that operates over the entity grid representation of a text. The model captures long range entity transitions along with entity-specific features without loosing generalization, thanks to the power of distributed representation. We present a pairwise ranking method to train the model in an end-to-end fashion on a task and learn task-specific high level features. Our evaluation on three different coherence assessment tasks demonstrates that our model achieves state of the art results outperforming existing models by a good margin.
Solution: A Neural Local Coherence Model
Reason: This statement "A Neural Local Coherence Model" is taken from the subtext "convolutional neural network" and its explanation in the passage. This is a positive example because the title belongs to the mentions in the passage

Now, solve this instance: Unsupervised training of deep generative models containing latent variables and performing inference remains a challenging problem for complex, high dimensional distributions. One basic approach to this problem is the so called Helmholtz machine and it involves training an auxiliary model that helps to perform approximate inference jointly with the generative model which is to be fitted to the training data. The top-down generative model is typically realized as a directed model that starts from some prior at the top, down to the empirical distribution at the bottom. The approximate inference model runs in the opposite direction and is typically trained to efficiently infer high probability latent states given some observed data. Here we propose a new method, referred to as geometric mean matching (GMM), that is based on the idea that the generative model should be close to the class of distributions that can be modeled by our approximate inference distribution. We achieve this by interpreting both the top-down and the bottom-up directed models as approximate inference distributions and by defining the target distribution we fit to the training data to be the geometric mean of these two. We present an upper-bound for the log-likelihood of this model and we show that optimizing this bound will pressure the model to stay close to the approximate inference distributions. In the experimental section we demonstrate that we can use this approach to fit deep generative models with many layers of hidden binary stochastic variables to complex and high dimensional training distributions.
Student:
Training opposing directed models using geometric mean matching