In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.

Comment: "What you are saying is that anyone can be given a rifle and some bullets and they can go out and kill someone who is supposedly protected like the President of the United States."
Nailed it.
I've done plenty of reading on the Kennedy assassination. Oswald fired from an upper floor of a building. He had a clear shot.
One out of every ten presidents has died from a violent act at the hands of ordinary human beings.
Threat

Comment: No. I'm sorry. We are allowed to call out the Ford family legacy as harmful and embarrassing AND still also be appalled by bureaucratic waste, left wingers and right alike. That's yet another reason why I loathe the number Rob and his strategists pulled over on us, the ridiculous us vs them, suburban vs urban, elites vs working guy baloney. Why do people eat that up? (God bless -- and help -- America!!)
Non-threat

Comment: I like the "waves" metaphor, but the waves are waves of benefits for the schools, for the sick, and for the elderly and poor. And the waves will touch much more. With funding stabilized to bring a floor under the sick and poor, and a hope for getting our schools out of the hell of the 3rd lowest HS graduation rate in the country, the legislature won't have to cut other areas to make budget. The already debt-ridden college students will be less likely to see tuitions shoot up. The state infrastructure and state services can be lifted a little.

Or we could decide that we really love the inequality we have in Oregon, where Wells Fargo, Comcast, Chevron, and their friends enjoy the lowest corporate taxes in America. (And are throwing big money against M97 to keep it that way.)
Non-threat