The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the self-need strategy, otherwise output No. self-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to create a personal need for an item in the negotiation, such as by pointing out that the participant sweats a lot to show preference towards water packages.

Context: 'I'm glad you understand my problem. But I really need those 3 firewood packages. I'd be happy to give you 2 water packages and all the food in exchange.' 'Initially you were willing to take the 2 packages of firewood. If you have all three I won't be able to cook any of this fish and it will all go to waste. ☹️' 'Didn't you bring any firewood at all with you?'
Utterance: 'Yes, but the firewood I have will be used to keep us warm tonight. Like you mentioned before it will be a bit chilly tonight.'
Yes

Context: 'Actually, I think I may need more food than water. How about I take the food and we can split the water. You may have 2 waters, if you need them.' 'Sure then. You can take all the food. It's not really a priority to me. ' 'Great. So if I have three food and one water, you can have three firewood and two water. Would that work for your trip?'
Utterance: 'That's perfect for my camping trip. '
No

Context:
Utterance: 'I need some firewood because I did not bring enough, I was thinking I could take 2 firewood, 1 food, and 2 water. What do you think?'
Yes