Just because he is airborne on a bridge does not mean he is doing tricks for a contest.. So what could be the question?
Question followed by answer: Premise: "A skateboarder is airborne on a bridge."
Hypothesis: "The skateboarder is doing tricks for a contest."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
it is not possible to tell
Two people are sitting at the top of a grassy hill.
The question and answer are below.
Given the sentence "Two mountain climbers stand on the ridge of a tall." can we conclude that "Snowy mountain."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
no
Playing roulette does not imply being in a Las Vegas casino.
The question and answer are below.
Given the sentence "People around a table playing roulette." can we conclude that "People are playing a game of roulette in a las vegas casino."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
it is not possible to tell
A boy that is alone could not be a man with a woman. Dancing and playing soccer are two different actions.. So what could be the question?
Question followed by answer: Can we conclude from "A man and a woman dancing on a stage." that "Boy plays soccer alone."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
no
Wall art is on a wall so if a man is walking past wall art then the man is walking past a wall.
The question and answer are below.
Given the sentence "A man in a red shirt walking past wall art." can we conclude that "A man is walking past a wall."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
yes
Dogs tug at items for fun. It isn't necessarily always a competition.
The question and answer are below.
Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "Two dogs tug at the same item while wearing training gear."
Hypothesis: "Dogs tugging for a competition."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
it is not possible to tell