IN: This is an email
Gentlemen, I've revised paragraph 5 to reflect our discussion. Also, I made a change to paragraph 7 to include technical bulletins per Mitch's request which we did not discuss on our call. Please let me know if you have any questions or comments.

What is the subject?

OUT: Letter agreement
QUESTION: Hi Jeannie: My apologies. I've been switched over to Windows 2000 and, well, things have been somewhat bumpy. I have a few comments on the Frevert piece but can't find the document you sent. Could you resend it? Best,
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: Frevert Piece
Richard: Highlighted below are changes to our standard confidentiality language=20 requested by a banking counterparty to an ISDA agreement. Would you let me= =20 know if it is acceptable? (i) Confidentiality. The contents of this Agreement and all other document= s=20 relating to this Agreement, and any information made available by one party= =20 or its Credit Support Provider to the other party or its Credit Support=20 Provider with respect to this Agreement is confidential and shall not be=20 disclosed to any third party (nor shall any public announcement relating to= =20 this Agreement be made by either party), except for such information (i) as= =20 may become generally available to the public, other than as a result of a= =20 disclosure in violation of the terms hereof (ii) as may be required or=20 appropriate in response to any summons, subpoena, or otherwise in connectio= n=20 with any litigation or to comply with any applicable law, order, regulation= ,=20 ruling, or accounting disclosure rule or standard, whether in response=20 thereto or upon initiation by either party in defending itself, reducing it= s=20 liability, or protecting or exercising any of its claims, rights, remedies = or=20 interests under or in connection with this Agreement or any Transaction (ii= i)=20 as may be obtained from a non-confidential source that disclosed such=20 information in a manner that did not violate its obligations to the=20 non-disclosing party or its Credit Support Provider in making such=20 disclosure, or (iv) as may be furnished to the disclosing party=01,s Affili= ates,=20 and to each of such person=01,s auditors, attorneys, advisors or lenders wh= ich=20 are required to keep the information that is disclosed in confidence. Thanks. =20
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: confidentiality language
<<IPW111201a.pdf>> Good Morning, Attached, please find the latest issue of our Independent Power Weekly. Summary: 1. IPPs Rise 3.8% Last week our IPP composite rose 3.8%, outperforming the S&P 500 (+3.0%), but underperforming the NASDAQ (+4.7%). Mirant, which was up 12.9%, was the strongest generator in the group. International Power was the weakest performer, declining 2.4%. 2. Generation Oriented Utilities Rise 5.5% Our universe of generation oriented utilities rose 5.5%, outperforming all major indices including the UTY (4.0%). Constellation Energy, which was up 8.6%, was the strongest performer in the group. Cleco Corp was the weakest performer, improving 3.4%. 3. DYN/ENE Deal Removes Overhang We attribute last week's strong performance to indications of an imminent resolution to Enron's financial difficulties in the form of an investment from Dynegy. Late on Friday, these reports proved true with Dynegy agreeing to acquire Enron and provide immediate liquidity support. Over the last few weeks, the group came under pressure owing to concerns about Enron's deteriorating credit quality. In particular, IPP investors were concerned about the level of receivables exposure of various companies to Enron. Further, some industry observers suggested that a damaging reduction in trading liquidity could result if Enron were forced to withdraw from the natural gas and power markets. 4. New Feature: Regional Spark Spread Analysis Inside we include a regional spark spread analysis looking back 2 years. Going forward, this analysis will be a regular feature in the Weekly. 5. Valuations Remain Attractive; Focus On the Major IPPs: Highlighting CPN, MIR and NRG Given diminishing Enron concerns, we would expect investors to refocus on attractive valuations across the sector. The pure play power producers are trading at a 12% average discount to their private market asset values. We continue to highlight Calpine, Mirant and NRG Energy. 6. MIR Hosting Analyst Seminar On Tuesday (11/13), Mirant will host its second major analyst meeting in Atlanta, Georgia. We expect management to discuss the following: 1. Business plan update; 2. 2002 earnings visibility; 3. Financing plans; and 4. Reaction to DYN/ENE deal. 7. CSFB Philippines Energy Forum; Relevant to MIR On 11/15 at 3.30 pm CSFB will host a Philippines Energy Forum at the Waldorf Hotel in NYC. The meeting will feature 3 speakers: 1. Her Excellency Gloria Macapagal Arroyo, The President of the Philippines; 2. the Honorable Vincent S. Perez, Jr., Secretary of the Department of Energy of the Philippines; and, 3. Rick Kuester, CEO of Mirant Asia Pacific. The forum will focus on upcoming developments and opportunities in the power and oil/gas industry in the Philippines. Regards,
Answer: CSFB IPP Weekly: DYN/ENE Deal Mitigates Overhang; MIR MeetingPre view; New Regional Spark Spread Analysis
Here is an email: Zero response from my last effort on this matter. Are your emails working men? Zander called and suggested we attend the CCA crawfish boil function to be held Thurday May 2, 2002. Reasonably priced event, beer, mud bugs and we can sit back and watch pig win raffle prizes. I'm in e.
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: man night again?
QUESTION: Please see the attached Tufco file for July. The 2,500 under the Wagner Brown contract on the 24th has been zeroed out (no flow at LS Katy for that day). This resulted in a change between contracts/deals on the 31st also. Let me know if you have any questions. D
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS:
Tufco @ Lone Star Katy - July 24 and 30