Q: Paul: Here is the FSA letter with my comments inserted in red. I have tried to make it a bit stronger by deleting references to our positions being merely "arguable." The language I deleted in the first part of 3.4 I thought was unnecessary and just point out doors that may remain open for the SFA. The language added in 3.5 was an attempt to show how much EEFT does vs. EnronOnline. Is there a reason we are referring to Net Works rather than EnronOnline LLC? It is also a Delaware limited liability company. Are we afraid it may have a I also wonder if the discussion of EPOL's involvement in 2.2 and 4.2 is really needed since the ETA is entered into on EEFT's behalf. If this has not yet been raised by the SFA, it doesn't seem necessary to flag it for them. My position would be that EEFT is a party to that agreement whenever it is necessary in connection with an investment. Mark
Propose a subject line
A: FSA Letter

Q: Engage Energy Canada, LP and Engage Energy America LLC have requested master agreements with ENA. I believe gty's are in already in place. Please send me a worksheet for these to entities. Thanks!
Propose a subject line
A: Engage Energy Canada,

Q: Hi Sophie, I like the sound of the Trifle described in your email to Mark. I will have extra Sherry on mine. How is it going? I had a great time at the party in Austin and hanging with you at the Brown Bar. I am not sure what I was thinking toward the end of the evening by mixing Tequila and Cranberry, but I guess you have to get creative when the circumstances require. I was moving a little slow the next day and drive back to Houston wasn't quite as pleasant. Did you have a good weekend? I didn't do anything real exciting for the weekend before Halloween. Went to a concert that had 4 bands. One of them is a band from Austin called Vallejo. Heard of them? Now tell me the truth. Do you really like Yorkshire Pudding? Drop me a line when you get a chance. Gerald
Propose a subject line
A: Hello!

Q: Sean, I am sending this note to request that the correct counterparty name be confirmed on the 2 below puchase deals for Sep/01 production. We are being invoiced by Coral Energy Canada Inc., whereas we have these deals in the system under Coral Energy Resources, L.P. I cannot find executed confirmations on these deals. Vladi Pimenov may be the trader or risk contact for these deals. Please advise or change as necessary. 1036802 1063131 Thank you,
Propose a subject line
A:
Counterparty Name Change - Coral