In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: insult and non-insult. Insult is any lanugage or act that is disrespectful or scornfully abusive.
One example: Comment: your posts shows you are stupid period
Solution is here: Insult
Explanation: This comment is insult because it is scornful and disrespectful.

Now, solve this: Comment: Yeah, I get that. Anybody can just order a cake and it'd be no issue (or should be no issue). But if a gay couple comes in and orders a wedding cake (for their wedding), then it puts him in a position of violating his religious beliefs. This is due to his religious views of marriage being deeply sacred event defined to be between one man and one woman. I hope that makes sense. And perhaps some of those blurry lines will be more defined by this supreme court ruling. I just want to point of the difference of saying, "No, I won't sell you this service because you are homosexual" and "No, I won't sell you this service because it will clearly be used as a key part of an event that violates my religious beliefs". And are we really ready to shut down all Christian, Muslim, etc. wedding companies for this reason? And if so, is that the role of the government and does that then violate the first amendment.
Solution:
Non-insult