Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.

[Q]: The best part of the ACA is that patients could not be denied for existing conditions. Previously, those patients with seriously expensive conditions were mostly paid through medicare and medicaid paid by the State and the Feds. Under ACA the really expensive patients got their insurance. The only difference is that the entire cost of their coverage is born by other ACA rate payers. 23,000 people, roughly 10% of insured people statewide, are paying the entire costs of our most expensive patients. This is a good bill and should be a priority.
[A]: No

[Q]: What a load of GARBAGE TUCK! Seriously? Tuck: "i'm not coming because you won't give us A,B, and C". There are cuts across the board and Tuck is acting like a fool, Walker is all "keep on keeping on" while he sits by sipping a margarita watching building renovations. What a bunch of hypocritical, greedy, unintelligent, waste of space people. I too elect to write some columns, a 10-part column about recalling these failures of Alaska. You're paid to do a job and they screw around. Guess what tuck, programs and benefits will be cut...sorry, welcome to the real world. And Walker...just leave. Anyone else not wanting to do their part? I'll draw you a map to the border.
[A]: Yes

[Q]: Investigation?

There was a fire. A manager from the restaurant made a public statement about the restaurant. That's called reporting.
[A]:
No