input: Once upon a time, there was a cowgirl named Clementine. Orange was her favorite color. Her favorite food was the strawberry. She really liked her Blackberry phone, which allowed her to call her friends and family when out on the range. One day Clementine thought she needed a new pair of boots, so she went to the mall. Before Clementine went inside the mall, she smoked a cigarette. Then she got a new pair of boots. She couldn't choose between brown and red. Finally she chose red, which the seller really liked. Once she got home, she found that her red boots didn't match her blue cowgirl clothes, so she knew she needed to return them. She traded them for a brown pair. While she was there, she also bought a pretzel from Auntie Anne's. 1. What was the cowgirls name?
2. Was blue her favorite color?
3. Where'd she buy a pretzel from?
4. Did she smoke a cig
5. Which color did she end up choosing
6. Did she need to return
7. why
8. did she replace them
9. where did she buy shoes from
10. Did she like the red boots Return numbered answers in your output.

output: 1. Clementine
2. no
3. Auntie Anne's
4. yes
5. red
6. yes
7. her red boots didn't match her blue cowgirl clothes
8. yes
9. mall
10. unknown

input: My summer hols wr CWOT. B4, WE USED 2go 2 NY 2C my bro, his GF & thr 3 :-@ KIDS FTF. ILNY, its gr8. Can you understand this sentence? If you can't, don't feel too bad: neither could the middle school teacher in England who received this as homework. This is Netspeak: the language of computerized communication found on Internet or cellphones. To newcomers, it can look like a completely foreign language. So, what is the "translation" of the sentence above? My summer holidays were a complete waste of time. Before, we used to go to New York to see my brother, his girlfriend, and their three screaming kids face to face. I love New York; it's great. School teachers and parents say this new form of writing is harming the English language. Increasing spelling and grammatical mistakes can be seen in students' writing. They fear the language could become corrupted . Everyone should just relax, say linguists . They believe Netspeak is in fact more of a good thing. David Crystal, from the University of Wales, argues that Netspeak and Internet create a new language use and the almost lost art of diary writing has been picked up again. Geoffrey Nunberg, from Stanford University, agrees. "People get better at writing by writing," he says. "Kids who are now doing text messaging, e-mail, and instant messages will write at least as well as, and possibly better than, their parents." Linguist James Milroy says, for centuries, it is believed without exception that young people are harming the language. And you can _ that when today's teenagers become tomorrow's parents, they too will think this way. Milroy argues that languages do not and cannot become "corrupted"; they simply change to meet the new needs. However, Netspeakers do agree that it is important to teach young people how to speak and write Standard English. Cynthia McVey says, "I can understand Netspeak worries teachers and it's important that they get across to their pupils that text messaging is for fun, but that learning to write proper English is a must for their future." Perhaps, we should give teenagers a little more trust anyway. Erin, age 12, says, "I wouldn't use text language in my homework. Text is just for fun." 1. who couldn't understand the sentence
2. what is the language
3. what was not worth the time?
4. How long has it been thought young ones are ruining wordds?
5. what do Netspeakers agree on?
6. How old is Erin?
7. What does she use text for?
8. what wouldn't she use it for?
9. what worries teachers?
10. who becomes tomorrow's parents?
11. what can be seen in their writing?
12. what is a lost art?
13. who thinks that?
14. what does gf mean
15. ftf?
16. what does ilny mean?
17. who recieved those words as homework?
18. what does CWOT mean
19. who has kids
20. who believes netspeak is a good thing?
21. who is geoffrey?
22. what should we give teenagers? Return numbered answers in your output.

output: 1. the middle school teacher
2. Netspeak:
3. My summer holidays
4. for centuries
5. that it is important to teach young people how to speak and write Standard English
6. 12
7. for fun
8. homework
9. the language could become corrupted
10. today's teenagers
11. spelling and grammatical mistakes
12. diary writing
13. David Crysta
14. girlfriend
15. face to face
16. I love New York;
17. the middle school teacher
18. complete waste of time.
19. my brother and his girlfriend
20. linguists
21. Nunberg, from Stanford University
22. more trust

input: (CNN) -- The United States breached international law by executing a Mexican national without having granted him consular access, the U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights said Friday.

Navi Pillay, in a statement, said she deeply regrets the execution of Humberto Leal Garcia, after a 5-4 decision by the U.S. Supreme Court denied him a stay of execution Thursday night.

"The execution of Mr. Leal Garcia places the U.S. in breach of international law," said Pillay, who is on an official mission in Mexico. "What the state of Texas has done in this case is imputable in law to the U.S. and engages the United States' international responsibility."

Pillay said Leal was not granted consular access, which -- as a foreign national -- was his right under Article 36 of the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations.

The denial of access raises concerns about whether Leal got a fair trial, Pillay said.

Leal, who was convicted for the 1994 rape and murder of a 16-year-old girl, was executed Thursday evening by lethal injection in Texas.

Federal officials, including the Obama administration, had tried to persuade Texas Gov. Rick Perry to delay the execution. "The secretary herself is quite disappointed in the outcome in this case," said State Department spokeswoman Victoria Neuland about Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.

"The U.S. government sought a stay of Leal's execution in order to give the Congress time to act on the Consular Notification Compliance Act, which would have provided Leal the judicial review required by international law." 1. Who was killed?
2. What country was he from?
3. In which state did the issue occur?
4. What did Garcia have a right to under an article of the Vienna Convention?
5. What number article details this right?
6. What was it about Garcia that entitled him to this right?
7. What crime did Garcia commit?
8. And what else?
9. Of whom?
10. How was he put to death?
11. True or False: Pillay upholds the decision to execute Garcia.
12. What did she say she feels about it?
13. What body refused to grant a stay of execution?
14. How many voted in support of granting the stay?
15. When was the decision made?
16. What is Pillay doing in Mexico?
17. Who did officials fail to get to delay the execution?
18. Who was dissappointed by what happened?
19. Who is the Secretary?
20. Hillary who?
21. Who was her spokesperson? Return numbered answers in your output.

output:
1. Garcia
2. Mexico
3. Texas
4. consular access
5. 36
6. oreign national
7. rape
8. murder
9. 16-year-old girl
10. lethal injection
11. false
12. regrets
13. U.S. Supreme Court
14. Nine
15. Thursday
16. official mission
17. Federal
18. secretary
19. Hillary
20. Clinton
21. Victoria