In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Example Input: Comment: "Damn that 1st Amendment!" ...

-- the FEC --
Example Output: Obscene

Example Input: Comment: Why should we have to pay to help idiots
use illegal dope. Let them die. That or bring
in Durete. He has what it takes to stop this crap.
Example Output: Obscene

Example Input: Comment: The author says private schools are part of a "racist and segregationist agenda" that started because missionaries didn't want their children mixing with Hawaiians. Hey, Lois, here's a news flash for you: the only private school in Hawaii with a segregationist agenda is the one that limits enrollment to children of Hawaiian ancestry. The missionary school you disparage has a very ethnically diverse student body and does NOT use race as an admissions criteria. I paid a lot of money so my kids, who, like me, are "multi-ethnic " could go there. I could have spent my money buying lots of bling-bling or a monster truck but I decided to invest in their future. I worked long hours to make the money and I'd do it all over again. Like everyone else I've heard the horror stories about public schools: incompetent teachers, disruptive students, inadequate facilities. Lois is the proverbial crab in the bucket who pulls down anyone trying to get ahead.
Example Output:
Non-obscene