Detailed Instructions: In this task, you must classify if a given review is positive/negative, indicating your answer as P or N.
Problem:do the folks at disney have no common decency ?
they have resurrected yet another cartoon and turned it into a live action hodgepodge of expensive special effects , embarrassing writing and kid - friendly slapstick .
was n't mr .
magoo enough , people ?
obviously not .
inspector gadget is not what i would call ideal family entertainment .
younger viewers will likely be taken in by the abounding goofiness , but their adult companions may feel a wave of nausea sweeping over them as they attempt to endure this appalling 80-minute exercise in glaring stupidity .
the movie is poorly edited , grossly manipulative , and the finished product resembles somewhat of a failed jigsaw puzzle .
all the elements are there , but the manner in which director david kellogg pieces them together is laughable and trite .
as a huge fan of the 80 's animated tv show , the first thing i must express is my anger toward the treatment of the main villain .
in the cartoon , dr .
claw was a frightening , raspy - voiced presence who remained a total mystery to the viewer .
we never saw his face ; he simply sat back in his arm - chair , watching surveillance cameras and gently stroking his loyal cat .
as a child , i always imagined what dr .
claw would appear as - and this curiosity kept me watching for many years .
with the release of the live - action movie , the face of this once intriguing villain has been unrightfully exposed -
it 's . . .
rupert everett ? !
only now , dr . claw is simply known as claw ( ' one word , '
he explains , ' like madonna ' ) .
he sports a shiny clamp instead of the steel glove , and seems far less interesting than the animated version .
it helps that the dashing everett is enthusiastic , but he overplays the role entirely too far .
when all is said and done , this was n't a very wise move on the part of the screenwriters - the infamous dr .
claw has been turned into a wisecracking game show host who makes cheap attempts at being suave and cool .
he does still have his cat , though .
in the title role , matthew broderick looks lost .
the actor , while usually downright charming , does n't know exactly where to take his character - a fault that again can be blamed on the hapless writers .
broderick first plays a friendly , naive security guard named john brown , who dreams of becoming a cop and upholding the law for the good of the people .
he has a mad crush on pretty scientist brenda ( joely fisher ) , who has stumbled upon a new wave of technology involving the interaction of human tissue and electronics .
but one fateful night , her lab is destroyed and her experiment is stolen by a fiendish millionaire ( everett ) who wants to take over the world .
john courageously pursues the limousine from the scene of the crime , but loses the chase when his vehicle bursts into flames .
in a full body cast , he is chosen to be the first human prototype for brenda 's work ; a revolutionary crime fighting tool with numerous fancy gadgets to dispatch bad guys .
and so is born inspector gadget .
as bad as this movie is , it does have a certain charm in isolated scenes .
broderick actually fares better playing robo gadget , an evil and destructive clone that claw has set loose on the city .
and there are about two or three amusing punch lines , the funniest being when robo gadget impersonates a rampaging monster with shadow puppets on a brick wall , and a japanese man flees the scene while screaming , ' this is why i left tokyo !
' alas , the hit ratio of the ongoing gags is about 20 to 1 in favor of not even cracking a slight giggle .
there are so many tired plot additions .
gadget 's talking car ( voiced by d .
l
. hughley ) is the same type of character as zoot the suit from my favorite martian .
both are wisecracking , non - human additions designed to coax laughter from smaller children .
well , it just does n't work
( in fact , zoot functioned marvelously in comparison to this ) .
and do n't even get me started about the villains .
i did n't mind everett 's performance , but his bumbling assistants will make every adult cringe with disgust .
the characters from the cartoon have been reduced to thankless supporting roles .
penny ( michelle trachtenberg ) and brain the dog now have little to do with the action , and chief quimby ( dabney coleman ) has lost considerable appeal in the transition of animation to live action .
the special effects are everywhere , but not so annoying they will cause your eyes to peel over .
the problem here lies solely in the script .
perhaps the next time disney attempts a remake like this , they will invest more in the screenplay than the fancy - schmancy visuals .
here is one critic crossing his fingers , anyway .
Solution:
N