In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Comment: I don't appreciate either the writing (such as it is) or the sentiment. The writing style is incoherent because these selfish individuals don't have any arguments to rationalize their presumed "privilege" to place wildlife and other human users of our rapidly fragmenting wilderness at risk.

Typical of the entitlement mentality crowd, it's all about THEM. Fact is once a bear has been aggravated into attacking a person, it's almost always destroyed because of the entirely rational concern the bear will subsequently be less afraid of humans after attacking one and coming away unscathed (which is usually the case). And this nose-ringed nitwit's solution? She'll wear a "don't kill the bear" tattoo! Yay. THAT oughtta help.

"Never underestimate the power of human stupidity."--R. A. Heinlein
Non-obscene

Comment: you don't get laid very often, do you?
Non-obscene

Comment: $54,000 a year to house a federal inmate = $1,080,000 for 20 yrs
Only an idiot would think that it's worth just over $1 million because this poor guy was out in the woods trying to grow A plant that has never killed anybody by overdosing in the history of mankind
But over 50,000 DUIs a year in the United States
Even the person with the limited intelligence can see the difference
And you wonder why you don't have any healthcare ................
Non-obscene