Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.

[EX Q]: Well B to Z you sound like a real wimp, with not much going on between your ears.
If I saw you pulling a gun on my dog, I would be shooting at you too. So you might think about actually crossing the street to avoid the dog and continuing your outing with your kid, which is what any reasonable person would do.
[EX A]: Yes

[EX Q]: The best part of the ACA is that patients could not be denied for existing conditions. Previously, those patients with seriously expensive conditions were mostly paid through medicare and medicaid paid by the State and the Feds. Under ACA the really expensive patients got their insurance. The only difference is that the entire cost of their coverage is born by other ACA rate payers. 23,000 people, roughly 10% of insured people statewide, are paying the entire costs of our most expensive patients. This is a good bill and should be a priority.
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: We've witnessed dirty presidential Republican Party politics in past elections. I'll bet that the Republican Party elite may say that they won't endorse Trump, they'll be rolling around on the ground like their demon possessed just to get his attention or have his shadow cast in their direction. Watch and see. I love it that Trump is daringly cheery picking which Republican elite he'll let kiss his middle finger.
[EX A]:
Yes