Question: Sentence A: Don't be superstitious--hypnotism is silly.

Sentence B: Hypnotism is superstitious.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question: Hitler wasn't a threat to the United States, but Ho Chi Minh was.
Hitler was never interested in the United States.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Problem: Here is a premise:
( Slate 's Jacob Weisberg reviews the book in his column, Strange Bedfellow.

Here is a hypothesis:
Slate's Jacob Weisberg gives an opinion about the book in his column.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Sentence 1: Amidst all this, Jack Lord and his hair died.

Sentence 2: Jack died amidst it all.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: yes

Question:
A grand $45 million production show in a classic but updated style.

Does it follow that "All $45 million was well spent on this production."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
it is not possible to tell

Question:
Based on the premise "Auditors will need to exercise professional judgment in assessing the significance of audit results or findings.", can we conclude that "Auditors are not responsible for the assessment of audit results."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
no