Problem: Here is a premise:
It also describes the total number of entities of all sizes that may be affected by the rule.

Here is a hypothesis:
It describes the entities that will be affected by the rule.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Sentence 1: Newsweek buys the argument in part but maintains that good parenting is still important.

Sentence 2: It is clear to everyone that parenting is irrelevant.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: no

Question:
right you're uh you know it's the best person qualified i think and and that's the way it ought to be but it's as we know it's not

Does it follow that "Sadly we don't look at the person with the best qualifications."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
it is not possible to tell

Q: If Mines there continue to yield lead, which is exported from Cartagena as it has been for centuries., can we say that "They are no longer allowed to mine lead in the area."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A: no

Premise:
"In particular, the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 emphasized the need for agencies to acquire and apply information resources to effectively support the accomplishment of agency missions and the delivery of services to the public."
Hypothesis: The paperwork reduction act was passed in 1995.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

yes

Sentence 1: In , William Saletan explains how the tax cut became a tax scheme.

Sentence 2: In his latest book, William Saletan talks about tax schemes.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer:
it is not possible to tell