Detailed Instructions: In this task, you will be shown a prompt from a judicial decision and multiple holding statements derived from citations following text in a legal decision. Holdings represent the governing legal rule when the law is applied to a particular set of facts. There are five answer choices for each citing text. The correct answer is the holding statement that corresponds to the citing text. You should write an incorrect option. Even though there exist multiple wrong answers, we only need a single wrong answer. There is a <HOLDING> token in the position of the citing text prompt where the holding statement was extracted.
Q: owned water system must charge the same rate to residents and nonresidents. The requirement that a municipality supplying public services to its own residents must act reasonably is stated more explicitly throughout Utah law. Article XI, section 6 of the Utah Constitution mandates that a municipal corporation supply water owned by it to its inhabitants "at reasonable charges." Utah Code Ann. 10-8-38 authorizes municipalities to construct and operate sewer systems and to "make a reasonable charge for the use thereof." This court has also held that water and sewer connection fees must be reasonable. Banberry Development Corp. v. South Jordan City, 631 P.2d 899, 901 (Utah 1981); see also Call v. City of West Jordan, 614 P.2d 1257, 1258 n. 1, 1259 (Utah h 530, 15 P.2d 648 (1932) (<HOLDING>). It is significant that Utah courts have
Holding statements: (A) holding that policy limits are not a defense to coverage and that policy limits define the amount of coverage (B) recognizing that an attorneys fee award does not become final and ripe for review until the amount is set (C) holding amount of fee for municipal inspection of gasoline and oil may be set by citys legislative department within reasonable limits (D) recognizing that the exercise of zoning authority within a home rule citys municipal borders is a matter of local concern (E) holding that where a contract for legal services fails to expressly provide for the amount of the fee a reasonable fee is implied
A:
holding that policy limits are not a defense to coverage and that policy limits define the amount of coverage