[QUESTION] Premise: "Blind man using a computer up close."
Hypothesis: "The man is only legally blind."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Being legally blind is not the only reason to use a computer up close.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

Q: Given the sentence "Looks like a man in a rodeo on a horse about to catch another animal." can we conclude that "The man is trying to catch the wild bull."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A: Not all animals caught by men in a rodeo are bulls. Not all bulls are wild.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

QUESTION: Can we conclude from "3 young boys carrying nets are walking in a park." that "Some kids are hoping to catch butterflies in their new nets."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell

Let's solve it slowly: Simply carrying nets doesn't mean the kids are going to catch butterflies.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

[QUESTION] Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "A young man mixes a can of paint."
Hypothesis: "A man works at home depot."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
A man mixes a can of paint does not imply works at home depot.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

Q: Premise: "Two teams of hockey players playing a game."
Hypothesis: "The teams are resting after a game."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A: The two teams cannot be resting after a game if they are currently playing a game.
The answer is no.

[QUESTION] Premise: "Little boy in a robe sits in a chair posing for the camera."
Hypothesis: "The boy is taking the picture."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Posing for the camera is the opposite of taking the picture with the camera.
The answer is no.