In this task, you will be presented with a context from an academic paper and you have to write an answerable question based on the context. Your questions can be extractive, abstractive, or yes-no questions.

Ex Input:
The training dataset contains 2,815 examples, where 1,940 (i.e., 69%) are fake news and 1,968 (i.e., 70%) are click-baits; we further have 761 testing examples.

Ex Output:
what datasets were used?

Ex Input:
For the overlapped speech recognition problem, the conditional independence assumption in the output label streams is still made as in Equation ( 5 ). Then the cross-entropy based PIT can be transformed to sequence discriminative criterion based PIT as below,

$$egin{split} \mathcal {J}_{ ext{SEQ-PIT}}=\sum _u \min _{s^{\prime }\in \mathbf {S}}
rac{1}{N} \sum _{n\in [1,N]}-\mathcal {J}_{ ext{SEQ}}(\mathbf {L}_{un}^{(s^{\prime })},\mathbf {L}_{un}^{(r)}) \end{split}$$ (Eq. 44)

Different from Equation ( 7 ), the best permutation is decided by $\mathcal {J}_{ ext{SEQ}}(\mathbf {L}_{un}^{(s^{\prime })},\mathbf {L}_{un}^{(r)})$ , which is the sequence discriminative criterion of taking the $s^{\prime }$ -th permutation in $n$ -th output inference stream at utterance $u$ . Similar to CE-PIT, $\mathcal {J}_{ ext{SEQ}}$ of all the permutations are calculated and the minimum permutation is taken to do the optimization.

Ex Output:
How is the discriminative training formulation different from the standard ones?

Ex Input:
Future work can be improving the sensationalism scorer and investigating the applications of dynamic balancing methods between RL and MLE in textGANBIBREF23. Our work also raises the ethical questions about generating sensational headlines, which can be further explored.

Ex Output:
What is future work planed?