In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

Example Input: Comment: _"like all Republicans: show me the money"_ -- GoDucks!

I have to love this. Some anonymous person, posting as "GoDucks!" is trying to knock a candidate for raising money.

Ummm. It's Nike's money that has turned UO from an educational institution into a semi-pro athletic money machine and party school.

Go Ducks indeed!

-- Paul
Example Output: Non-identity-attack

Example Input: Comment: What a bigot. Guess you thought Harpo's cabinets were all geniuses - not.
Example Output: Non-identity-attack

Example Input: Comment: For the first time ever, despite my considerable disagreement with past Presidents, I feel like the memory of the brave and valorous has been sullied by pomp, presence, and what comes off as opportunism of the Commander in Chief. The "right" thing for the President to have done was to just stay in his room and keep quiet today. Out of respect. Because he is so divisive that his presence offends. Yes he's the President. Yes the office holder traditionally delivers a Memorial Day address. But this President, by his very generally noxious presence and suspect motive for just about all he says, really casts a shadow over the purpose of this day, and the fond and respectful memories it is intended to invoke. Never ever imagined I would see a day when a US President's Memorial Day message actually diminishes those memories. Sad. This is what it has come to.
Example Output:
Non-identity-attack