Part 1. Definition
In this task, you must classify if a given review is positive/negative, indicating your answer as P or N.
Part 2. Example
plot : two teen couples go to a church party , drink and then drive .
they get into an accident .
one of the guys dies , but his girlfriend continues to see him in her life , and has nightmares .
what 's the deal ?
watch the movie and " sorta " find out . . .
critique : a mind - fuck movie for the teen generation that touches on a very cool idea , but presents it in a very bad package .
which is what makes this review an even harder one to write , since i generally applaud films which attempt to break the mold , mess with your head and such ( lost highway & memento ) , but there are good and bad ways of making all types of films , and these folks just did n't snag this one correctly
.
they seem to have taken this pretty neat concept , but executed it terribly .
so what are the problems with the movie ?
well , its main problem is that it 's simply too jumbled
.
it starts off " normal " but then downshifts into this " fantasy " world in which you , as an audience member ,
have no idea what 's going on
.
there are dreams , there are characters coming back from the dead , there are others who look like the dead , there are strange apparitions , there are disappearances , there are a looooot of chase scenes , there are tons of weird things that happen , and most of it is simply not explained .
now i personally do n't mind trying to unravel a film every now and then , but when all it does is give me the same clue over and over again , i get kind of fed up after a while , which is this film 's biggest problem .
it 's obviously got this big secret to hide , but it seems to want to hide it completely until its final five minutes .
and do they make things entertaining , thrilling or even engaging , in the meantime ?
not really .
the sad part is that the arrow and i both dig on flicks like this , so we actually figured most of it out by the half - way point , so all of the strangeness after that did start to make a little bit of sense , but it still did n't the make the film all that more entertaining .
i guess the bottom line with movies like this is that you should always make sure that the audience is " into it " even before they are given the secret password to enter your world of understanding .
i mean , showing melissa sagemiller running away from visions for about 20 minutes throughout the movie is just plain lazy ! !
okay , we get it .
. .
there are people chasing her and we do n't know who they are .
do we really need to see it over and over again ?
how about giving us different scenes offering further insight into all of the strangeness going down in the movie ?
apparently , the studio took this film away from its director and chopped it up themselves , and it shows .
there might 've been a pretty decent teen mind - fuck movie in here somewhere , but i guess " the suits " decided that turning it into a music video with little edge , would make more sense .
the actors are pretty good for the most part , although wes bentley just seemed to be playing the exact same character that he did in american beauty , only in a new neighborhood .
but my biggest kudos go out to sagemiller , who holds her own throughout the entire film , and actually has you feeling her character 's unraveling .
overall , the film does n't stick
because it does n't entertain , it 's confusing , it rarely excites and
it feels pretty redundant for most of its runtime , despite a pretty cool ending and explanation to all of the craziness that came before it .
oh ,
and by the way , this is not a horror or teen slasher flick . . .
it 's just packaged to look that way because someone is apparently assuming that the genre is still hot with the kids .
it also wrapped production two years ago and has been sitting on the shelves ever since .
whatever . .
. skip it !
where 's joblo coming from ?
a nightmare of elm street 3 ( 7/10 ) - blair witch 2 ( 7/10 ) - the crow ( 9/10 ) - the crow : salvation ( 4/10 )
- lost highway ( 10/10 ) - memento ( 10/10 ) - the others ( 9/10 ) - stir of echoes ( 8/10 )
Answer: N
Explanation: The phrases used in the review convey a negative sentiment (e.g. "presents it in a very bad package").
Part 3. Exercise
it 's tough to really say something nice about a type of person who 's so ethnocentric that any humanity they once had is now gone , but by god , " american history x " does it , and for that , i commend it .
it not only takes balls but intelligence to make a human being out of a neo - nazi skinhead , a kind of person who dedicates their lives to hating anyone who 's not what they are , and this film wisely and miracurously pulls it off .
the subject of this film is one of them , but he is worse than one of the blind followers that make up most skinhead members since he is the leader of the pack .
he 's the one who instigates them to take a firm grip onto their rage ,
and then in another brilliant stroke , justifies it with political propoganda that makes eerie sense when he speaks .
he 's so utterly convincing as a public speaker and so firm in his convictions that it comes as a shock when he actually goes through the rehabilitation process .
his name is derek vinyard , and he 's played by edward norton with so much fire and intensity that when he speaks he 's almost as convincing and arresting a public speaker as , say , malcom
x. when we first see him , he 's clean shaven , with a jet black swastica emrboidered on his left breast , a devlish goatee , and he 's attacking the black carjackers outside of his house dressed in nothing but his white boxers and carrying a handgun in his hand that never seems to run out of bullets , at least when he does n't need them .
he so believes in his convictions that he 's willing to put his beliefs to the test , even if he knows it will mean a stop in prison , if only for a couple years .
" american history x " is about derek , how he became a neo - nazi skinhead , how he rose to power , how he was rehabilitated in prison after murdering two black men in a fit of rage that was less to do with the stealing of his car and more to do with proving himself , and how he tried to save others , namely his younger brother , from making the same mistake .
we see him at all of these stages - as a smart teenager , a vicious hate monger , a man having an epiphany , and the man who tries to correct what he 's done before - and in all of these , we get a portrait of a man from all sides .
or at least , that 's the intention .
the film 's framing device is his brother , danny ( edward furlong , perpetually looking about 13 ) , also now a skinhead , and how his principal , bob sweeney ( avery brooks , who i just found out was or is the captain on star trek 's deep space 9 ) , is trying to " correct " him .
when the film opens , danny has just written a book report on " mein kampf , " landing him in trouble with sweeney , which causes him to make him write a paper on derek 's life and how it has gotten him nowhere .
coincidentally , this day is the day derek is released from prison , and when we see him , he 's cleaned - up , not as buff , and has a full head of hair .
he 's just as intelligent , but still very rough along the edges , but he 's wisened up .
he 's no longer controlled by his anger at blacks and jews , and tries to persuade danny , who 's becoming what derek was before , to give up his lifestyle .
but danny wo n't .
he goes to a large skinhead beer bash , meets with the skinhead leader ( stacy keach ) , and then discovers that derek is as opposed to neo - nazi - dom as he was for it a couple of years ago .
the film circles around this , then spins off into non - linear flashbacks , all done in black and white .
we mostly see derek at his prime as a skinhead , living in venice beach , organizing vicious and quasi - sadistic raids on local stores that no longer hire the white , middle - class teenagers since they can easily get cheaper illegal immigrants to do the same work , and mouthing off his theories on affirmative action and how illegal immigrants and blacks have destroyed the fundamentals this country was built on .
to them , the white man is the one who has gotten the fuzzy end of the lolipop , and he not only speaks elloquently , forcefully , and intelligently , but he backs everything up with political reasons , justifying their rage at least to them .
and frighteningly enough , much of what he says sounds true .
" american history x " is a collection of really great scenes and moments , rather than a cohesive , great film that flows effortlessly from one moment to the next .
in it , there are some of the best scenes i 've seen all year .
one scene features a dinner between derek 's family , and his mother 's newest boyfriend ( played with reserve by eliott gould ) , a jewish liberal who quietly disagrees with derek 's rightist views , launching the scene into a fit of rage and anger that builds unparalled emotions in the audience ( gould 's reaction to derek 's final summation is unnerrving ) .
another scene uses humor and traditional macho sex talk to build a friendship and a nice connection between derek and a black co - worker ( guy torry ) while folding laundry in prison . and another soon - to - be - classic is actually divided in two : the murder of the two black men that winds derek in jail , which contains a final murder so nasty that it may be the most revoltingly shocking all year .
there 's much more to appreciate , like the acting , which is uniformly good ,
with stand - outs coming from avery brooks , beverly d'angelo ( as the long - suffering mother ) , and gould ( who has one horrible line , but other than that , comes off with the best performance
he 's given in what seems like a really long time ) .
norton walks off with the film , though , coming off with such intensity that he reduces anyone not doing an adequate job to rubble .
in only the fifth movie of his career , norton has invented himself as one of the most reliable and intense actors of his generation , and maybe the best .
there 's nothing like it when norton really gets rolling in this movie , spewing out lines with such authority that he commands all attention from the audience , coming off with power similar to that of a young maron brando .
that he allows the little emotions to seep through is amazing .
sadly enough , this is n't going to be the great portrait of racism that it perhaps hopes to be .
it 's too unambitious and even a little contrived to really take off as either a powerful statement or an emotional masterpiece .
the ending , especially , is pencilled in from other movies , tossed in just so the emotional keyboard can be trounced upon .
some of the skinheads are reduced to mere cliches ( kevin smith regular ethan suplee fairs rather annoyingly as the " fat skinhead , " whose lines consist without fail of expressing his desire to eat more ) , and even the dramatic arc is n't as well travelled .
furlong 's danny never seems to really be learning a lesson , since the flashbacks refuse to show his point of view , and when he decides to make a change by the end ( which was inevitable ) , it does n't seem like it has actually arrived there .
even derek 's descent into skinhead - dom does n't seem justified .
though his fireman father ( william russ , the dad from " boy meets world , " and do n't ask me how i know that ) is killed by a black junkie , and even before he spoke against affirmative action intelligently , there never seems to be any real back story why derek became so intense about his beliefs .
as such , one can see why the director , tony kaye , wanted to have his name removed . sorta .
" american history x " is a very good movie , and i was very moved by it , but it could be a lot better , and the problem seems to be that the cut as it is is not up to what he claims to be his potential .
somewhere , he claims , there lies a tony kaye cut , and that was to be the true cut until it was viewed by norton , who then ordered another cut , and that is thus .
although he aimed for the directing credit to go to " alan smithee , " the resident name for any film that is to be disowned by its director , it was n't allowed to him , under the grounds that once you disown a film , you can not badmouth it ( but really , that 's the macguffin - no one really wanted a film this good to be given the alan smithee sign of disapproval ) .
kaye 's right in that it 's not up to par , even if he 's not referring to normal par but rather his own personal par .
this will not be a " do the right thing " for the late 90s .
yet it still gets its point across intelligently , and backs it up with its story ( its message , that one can not be so enwrapped in one 's own beliefs or pain and suffering will occur , is literally said over the narration , unfortunately ) .
and even if it is n't perfect , at least when avery brooks turns to norton after he has been beaten and raped in prison , and asks him if anything he 's done has made his life any better
, it realy hits a nerve , not only in derek , but also in the audience .
Answer:
P