In this task, You are given a review of Amazon's food products. Your task is to divide them into two classes: negative or positive, depending on the content of the review.

Let me give you an example: These are junk! Both bulbs have burned out within a two month period!! I cannot believe that this company can be in business with such poor quality. I have used infrared lights for my ball python for many years now and I get a varied range of months from a bulb, but I have never gone through two bulbs in a matter of two months! I am very disappointed.
The answer to this example can be: negative
Here is why: The user seems very disappointed in the product. Because the bulb they ordered has been burned out earlier than usual. So, it's a negative review.

OK. solve this:
The AMA uses metal wires on this which they do not do on their ICD Manual. As a result within less than ten days the holes at the bottom and top were tearing with their thin paper. This is a lot of money for a manual that begins falling apart when you use it. As bond it is a defective product. I had to search and pay for a plastic binding coil and will now have to pay for someone to insert it. There is no sense in this when the AMA could use the same coil it does on its other manuals.
Answer:
negative