In this task, you are given text for US Congressional and California state bills, your task is to generate a summary for this bill.

Example Input: SECTION 1. FINDINGS.

Congress finds the following:
(1) The United States must have adequate infrastructure and
policies in place under the Department of Homeland Security to
protect against potential terrorists attempting to enter the
United States along the Southwest Border.
(2) According to top government officials, several Al Qaeda
leaders believe operatives can pay their way into the country
through Mexico and also believe illegal entry is more
advantageous than legal entry for operational security reasons.
(3) Official border patrol records reveal a disturbing
trend on the southern border indicating a growth in other than
Mexicans (OTMs), many from countries of interest, crossing into
the United States--between 2003 and 2004 the increase was at
least 35 percent.
(4) Because of budget constraints, the U.S. Immigration and
Customs Enforcement Office of Detention and Removal does not
have sufficient bed space to detain all illegal immigrants from
special interest countries therefore releasing them on personal
recognizance.
(5) The Department of Homeland Security estimates that up
to 90 percent of these immigrants do not appear for their
immigration hearings.
(6) The Department of Homeland Security needs more
personnel at the borders with the necessary security clearances
and equipment to adequately screen and detain immigrants coming
to the United States.
(7) The Secretary of Homeland Security should provide
appropriate training for inspectors, and associated support
staff, on an ongoing basis to utilize new technologies and to
ensure that the proficiency levels of such personnel are
acceptable to protect the borders of the United States.

SEC. 2. IMPROVEMENT IN SECURITY CLEARANCE PROCESS ALONG THE UNITED
STATES-MEXICO BORDER AND INCREASE IN DETENTION BEDS.

(a) Improvement in Security Clearance Process.--The Secretary of
Homeland Security shall--
(1) expeditiously implement policies ensuring that
personnel of the Department of Homeland Security along the
United States-Mexico border have the security clearances
required to access information necessary to adequately screen
immigrants entering the United States at such border, including
IDENT and IAFIS databases and databases used by the
Department's inspectors in secondary inspections;
(2) develop the interagency agreements and information
technology infrastructure necessary for border agents to
adequately screen immigrants entering the United States at such
border; and
(3) explore information sharing programs with countries of
interest to adequately screen immigrants entering our borders.
(b) Increase in Detention Beds.--Subject to the availability of
appropriations, the Secretary of Homeland Security shall increase by
the amount necessary the number of detention beds needed to detain all
immigrants apprehended by U.S. Customs and Border Protection.
(c) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of the Congress that the
Office of Detention and Removal Operation should be placed under the
operational control of the Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border
Protection, since the largest client of such office is the Border
Patrol.

SEC. 3. STUDY OF PERSONNEL LEVELS.

(a) In General.--The Secretary of Homeland Security shall contract
with an independent entity to undertake a study to determine the
necessary level and allocation of personnel, including support staff,
at United States ports of entry and border patrol sectors.
(b) Items to Be Included.--Such study shall take into account at
least the following:
(1) The overall mission of U.S. Customs and Border
Protection.
(2) Threat and vulnerability information pertaining to the
Nation's borders and ports of entry
(3) The impact of new border security programs, policies
and technologies, and the level of cross-training received by
all staff.
(c) Report.--Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment
of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the appropriate
congressional committees, as defined in section 2(2) of the Homeland
Security Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 101(2)), a report on the study conducted
under this section.

SEC. 4. ONGOING TRAINING OF BORDER SECURITY PERSONNEL.

The Secretary of Homeland Security shall provide appropriate
training for all border security personnel, and associated support
staff on an ongoing basis to utilize new technologies and to ensure
that the proficiency levels of such personnel are acceptable to protect
the borders of the United States.

SEC. 5. PROMPT AND PROPER ENFORCEMENT.

(a) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of the Congress that--
(1) prosecutors and immigration judges are critical for the
prompt and proper enforcement of our immigration laws, and are
an important part of a comprehensive strategy; and
(2) an insufficient number of prosecutors and immigration
judges currently exists to enforce the immigration laws of the
United States.
(b) Authorization.--There are hereby authorized to be appropriated
amounts necessary to provide for appropriate staff increases for
judicial and prosecutorial offices, commensurate with other personnel
increases directed in this Act.

SEC. 6. REPORT ON DETENTION AND REMOVAL OPERATIONS.

(a) In General.--The Secretary of Homeland Security shall submit to
the appropriate congressional committees (as defined in section 2(2) of
the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 101(2))) a report on
detention and removal operations, detailing the amount of additional
detention space and resources required to detain all persons presenting
a possible threat to homeland security.
(b) Information to Be Included.--The report shall include
information on--
(1) alternatives to detention, including electronic
monitoring, telephone, and voice recognition programs for those
on bond, and conducting deportation proceedings prior to
prisoners' release from Federal, State, and local prisons; and
(2) countries to which removal is problematic.

SEC. 7. COMPREHENSIVE BORDER SECURITY STRATEGY.

The Secretary of Homeland Security, in consultation with the heads
of all other Federal agencies with border-related functions or with
facilities or lands on or along the border, shall submit to the
appropriate congressional committees (as defined in section 2 of the
Homeland Security Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 101)) unclassified and
classified versions of a unified, comprehensive strategy to secure the
land borders of the United States. Such strategy shall be submitted not
later than 6 months after the date of the enactment of this Act and
shall include a description of the actions already taken to implement
the strategy.
Example Output: Requires the Secretary of Homeland Security to: (1) ensure that Department of Homeland Security personnel along the U.S.-Mexico border have the security clearances required to access information to adequately screen entering immigrants; (2) develop the interagency agreements and information technology infrastructure necessary for such screening; (3) explore information sharing programs with countries of interest; and (4) increase by the amount necessary the number of detention beds needed to detain all immigrants apprehended by U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP).

Expresses the sense of Congress that the Office of Detention and Removal Operations should be placed under the operational control of the Commissioner of CBP (currently, under U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement).

Requires the Secretary to: (1) contract with an independent entity to study the necessary level and allocation of personnel at U.S. ports of entry and border patrol sectors; (2) provide ongoing training for all border security personnel; and (3) submit a report on detention and removal operations and a unified, comprehensive border security strategy to appropriate congressional committees.

Expresses the sense of Congress that: (1) prosecutors and immigration judges are critical for the prompt and proper enforcement of immigration laws and are an important part of a comprehensive strategy; and (2) there is an insufficient number of prosecutors and immigration judges for immigration enforcement. Authorizes appropriations for staff increases.

Example Input: SECTION 1. FINDINGS.

Congress finds the following:
(1) Twice since 1989, the northwestern coast of Maui,
Hawaii, has been plagued with massive blooms of the green alga,
Cladorphora sericea. Blooms of the red alga, Hypnea
musciformis, have also occurred in the area and in the Kihei
area.
(2) The algal blooms have destroyed corals and other reef-
building organisms, and have washed up on beaches and severely
impeded the recreational use of affected coastal areas.
(3) The algal blooms are particularly detrimental to the
natural ecological balance of the near-shore reef environment.
(4) Although the specific causes of the algal blooms are
uncertain, algal growth is stimulated in a proportional manner
by concentrations of chemicals such as fertilizers and
insecticides, which enter the ocean through freshwater runoff.
(5) The Department of Health of the State of Hawaii has
indicated that the department does not have the resources at
this time to determine the cause of the algal blooms.
(6) Extensive research will be required to determine the
factors that contribute to algal growth.
(7) Potential sources of nutrients that may contribute to
algal growth include the near-shore disposal of sewage in
injection wells from the Lahaina Wastewater Treatment Plant,
surface runoff from agricultural lands and urban resort areas,
and subsurface point sources in the areas.
(8) The long-term environmental impacts of the algal blooms
are unknown, but in the short term, reefs exposed to the algae
are being destroyed and the deterioration of the coral has
detrimental effects on fish and other wildlife that depend on
the reefs for survival.
(9) The algal blooms are generating negative economic
impacts as well as negative biological impacts, as additional
reports indicate that the algae are decreasing the intake of
fish caught by local fishermen in the affected marine waters.
(10) The Maui Algae Task Force is comprised of community
environmental activists and has been assembled to address the
problem of algal blooms.
(11) The Maui Algae Task Force hopes to work in cooperation
with the Department of Health of the State of Hawaii and the
Environmental Protection Agency to identify and eradicate the
causes of the algal blooms.

SEC. 2. STUDY.

(a) In General.--The Administrator of the Environmental Protection
Agency (hereafter in this Act referred to as the ''Administrator'')
shall conduct a study to--
(1) determine the causes of recent algal blooms off the
northwestern coast of Maui, Hawaii; and
(2) research alternatives for the improved management of
chemicals present in wastewater treatment and fresh water
runoff.
(b) Study Requirements.--In carrying out the study under this
section, the Administrator shall--
(1) survey and monitor--
(A) seaweed populations and animals for which the
seaweed is a food source;
(B) surface water runoff sediments in the study
area; and
(C) inputs into the study area from subsurface
point sources, including any such inputs from the
Lahaina wastewater treatment plant; and
(2) study the responses of--
(A) the seaweed populations referred to in
paragraph (1)(A) to different concentrations of
nutrients; and
(B) the animals referred to in paragraph (1)(A) to
pesticides and other biological toxins.
(c) Equipment; Grants.--
(1) Acquisition of equipment.--In carrying out the study
under this section, the Administrator is authorized to acquire
such monitoring and testing equipment as the Administrator
determines necessary.
(2) Grants.--In carrying out the study under this section,
the Administrator is authorized to establish a grant program to
provide grants to eligible entities that submit approved
applications to the Administrator. The following entities may
submit an application to conduct study activities under this
section:
(A) The Department of Health of the State of
Hawaii.
(B) The Maui Algae Task Force.
(C) Appropriate Federal, State, or county
departments or agencies.
(D) Any other entity that the Administrator
determines to be appropriate.
(d) Demonstration Projects.--In carrying out the study under this
section, the Administrator is authorized to establish demonstration
projects to identify and implement best management practices for the
control of nonpoint source pollution from erosion and agricultural
runoff.
(e) Reports.--
(1) Interim report.--Not later than 1 year after the date
of enactment of this Act, the Administrator shall submit to
Congress a report that includes interim results of the study
conducted under this section, and such recommendations as the
Administrator determines to be appropriate.
(2) Final report.--Not later than January 31, 1996, the
Administrator shall submit to Congress a final report that
summarizes the results of the study conducted under this
section and includes such recommendations as the Administrator
determines to be appropriate.
(f) Authorization of Appropriations.--There are authorized to be
appropriated to the Environmental Protection Agency to carry out this
section $500,000 for each of fiscal years 1994 and 1995.
Example Output: Directs the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency to study and report to the Congress on the causes of recent algal blooms off the northwestern coast of Maui, Hawaii, and to research alternatives for the improved management of chemicals present in wastewater treatment and fresh water runoff.
Authorizes the Administrator to establish: (1) a grant program to enable eligible entities to conduct study activities; and (2) demonstration projects to implement best management practices for the control of nonpoint source pollution from erosion and agricultural runoff.
Authorizes appropriations.

Example Input: SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ''Product Safety Notification and
Recall Effectiveness Act of 2002''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS AND PURPOSES.

(a) Findings.--Congress finds the following:
(1) The Consumer Product Safety Commission conducts
approximately 300 recalls of hazardous, dangerous, and
defective consumer products each year.
(2) In developing comprehensive corrective action plans
with recalling companies, the Consumer Product Safety
Commission staff greatly relies upon the media and retailers to
alert consumers to the dangers of unsafe consumer products,
because the manufacturers do not generally possess contact
information regarding the purchasing consumers. Based upon
information received from companies maintaining customer
registration lists, such contact information is known for
generally less than 7 percent of the total consumer products
produced and distributed.
(3) The Consumer Product Safety Commission staff has found
that most consumers do not return purchaser identification
cards because of requests for marketing and personal
information on the cards, and the likelihood of receiving
unsolicited marketing materials.
(4) The Consumer Product Safety Commission staff has
conducted research demonstrating that direct consumer contact
is one of the most effective ways of motivating consumer
response to a consumer product recall.
(5) Companies that maintain consumer product purchase data,
such as product registration cards, warranty cards, and rebate
cards, are able to effectively notify consumers of a consumer
product recall.
(6) The Consumer Product Safety Commission staff has found
that a consumer product safety owner card, without marketing
questions or requests for personal information, that
accompanied products such as small household appliances and
juvenile products would increase consumer participation and
information necessary for direct notification in consumer
product recalls.
(7) The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration has,
since March 1993, required similar simplified, marketing-free
product registration cards on child safety seats used in motor
vehicles.
(b) Purpose.--The purpose of this Act is to reduce the number of
deaths and injuries from defective and hazardous consumer products
through improved recall effectiveness, by--
(1) requiring the Consumer Product Safety Commission to
promulgate a rule to require manufacturers of juvenile
products, small household appliances, and certain other
consumer products, to include a simplified product safety owner
card with those consumer products at the time of original
purchase by consumers, or develop effective electronic
registration of the first purchasers of such products, to
develop a customer database for the purpose of notifying
consumers about recalls of those products; and
(2) encouraging manufacturers, private labelers, retailers,
and others to use creativity and innovation to create and
maintain effective methods of notifying consumers in the event
of a consumer product recall.

SEC. 3. DEFINITIONS.

For purposes of this Act:
(1) Terms defined in consumer product safety act.--The
definitions set forth in section 3 of the Consumer Product
Safety Act (15 U.S.C. 2052) shall apply to this Act.
(2) Covered consumer product.--The term ''covered consumer
product'' means--
(A) a juvenile product;
(B) a small household appliance; and
(C) such other consumer product as the Commission
considers appropriate for achieving the purpose of this
Act.
(3) Juvenile product.--The term ''juvenile product''--
(A) means a consumer product intended for use, or
that may be reasonably expected to be used, by children
under the age of 5 years; and
(B) includes--
(i) full-size cribs and nonfull-size cribs;
(ii) toddler beds;
(iii) high chairs, booster chairs, and
hook-on chairs;
(iv) bath seats;
(v) gates and other enclosures for
confining a child;
(vi) playpens;
(vii) stationary activity centers;
(viii) strollers;
(ix) walkers;
(x) swings;
(xi) child carriers; and
(xii) bassinets and cradles.
(4) Product safety owner card.--The term ''product safety
owner card'' means a standardized product identification card
supplied with a consumer product by the manufacturer of the
product, at the time of original purchase by the first
purchaser of such product for purposes other than resale, that
only requests that the consumer of such product provide to the
manufacturer a minimal level of personal information needed to
enable the manufacturer to contact the consumer in the event of
a recall of the product.
(5) Small household appliance.--The term ''small household
appliance'' means a consumer product that is a toaster, toaster
oven, blender, food processor, coffee maker, or other similar
small appliance as provided for in the rule promulgated by the
Consumer Product Safety Commission.

SEC. 4. RULE REQUIRING SYSTEM TO PROVIDE NOTICE OF RECALLS OF CERTAIN
CONSUMER PRODUCTS.

(a) In General.--The Commission shall promulgate a rule under
section 16(b) of the Consumer Product Safety Act (15 U.S.C. 2065(b))
that requires that the manufacturer of a covered consumer product shall
establish and maintain a system for providing notification of recalls
of such product to consumers of such product.
(b) Requirement To Create Database.--
(1) In general.--The rule shall require that the system
include use of product safety owner cards, Internet
registration, or an alternative method, to create a database of
information regarding consumers of covered consumer products,
for the sole purpose of notifying such consumers of recalls of
such products.
(2) Use of technology.--Alternative methods specified in
the rule may include use of on-line product registration and
consumer notification, consumer information data bases,
electronic tagging and bar codes, embedded computer chips in
consumer products, or other electronic and design strategies to
notify consumers about product recalls, that the Commission
determines will increase the effectiveness of recalls of
covered consumer products.
(c) Use of Commission Staff Proposal.--In promulgating the rule,
the Commission shall consider the staff draft for an Advanced Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking entitled ''Purchaser Owner Card Program'', dated
June 19, 2001.
(d) Exclusion of Low-Price Items.--The Commission shall have the
authority to exclude certain low-cost items from the rule for good
cause.
(e) Deadlines.--
(1) In general.--The Commission--
(A) shall issue a proposed rule under this section
by not later than 90 days after the date of enactment
of this Act; and
(B) shall promulgate a final rule under this
section by not later than 270 days after the date of
enactment of this Act.
(2) Extension.--The Commission may extend the deadline
described in paragraph (1) if the Commission provides timely
notice to the Committee on Energy and Commerce of the House of
Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and
Transportation of the Senate.
Example Output:
Product Safety Notification and Recall Effectiveness Act of 2002 - Directs the Consumer Product Safety Commission to promulgate a rule requiring the manufacturer of specified juvenile products and small household appliances to establish and maintain a product recall notification system for consumers.Requires such system to create a database for the sole purpose of notifying such consumers of product recalls through the use of product safety owner cards (or an alternative method).