Q: Just a 'heads up' - there is now no doubt that there will need to be some major revisions to the index language. I am meeting with some of the folks from the confirm desks this afternoon to get them started on a further review. Can you please arrange to have the following people given access to the Product Manager: Jeff Sorenson Dale Neuner Bob Bowen Lynn Shivers Kevin Sweeney
Propose a subject line
A: Online Indexes
IN: Your review and approval of the following product types in the EOL Data manager is needed (for directions on approval, please see steps for approval at the bottom of this e-mail). If you have any questions please call me at ext. 39555 or Chris Walker at ext. 37533 ******** DO NOT APPROVE PRODUCT TYPES BETWEEN THE HOURS OF 6AM - 11AM*********** Lawyer: John Viverito (Mark, John already approved Long Description) Product Type(s): US LLDPE Phy US LLDPE Phy Hexene Hou c/LB US LLDPE Phy Butene Hou c/LB US HDPE Phy US HDPE Phy Inject8MI Hou c/LB US HDPE Phy Inject20MI Hou c/LB US HDPE Phy HMW0.04MI Hou c/LB US PPHP Phy US PP-HP Phy 3MFR Hou c/LB US PP-HP Phy 17MFR Hou c/LB US PP-HP Phy Inject20MFRHou c/LB US PP-HP Phy Inject35MFRHou c/LB Trader(s): Alan Engberg GTC: Enron Petrochemicals Company, Inc., a division of Enron Liquids Fuels, Inc. Description(s):

Generate a subject line.

OUT: PLEASE APPROVE - 3 PLASTIC PRODUCTS - URGENT
IN: This is an email
Susan, We have received our statement for September and the price has changed from our original contract and what we have previously been paid. The statement shows that we are being paid three different amounts for various volumes, rather than the average of the three prices plus $.01. I have spoken with Tricia Truong and she suggest I speak to you. Also the transportation has changed on the statement. Has this changed? Is something in error or has the contract changed? Thank you,

What is the subject?

OUT: Contract Price for Bazor Ridge Enron Contract 96045124
QUESTION: We reached a conceptual agreement with the government representatives on Sunday night. The main points are: 1. Rationing losses: Defined methodology giving distribution companies recovery over the next 36 months of rationing losses realised from June 01 until the end of rationing in 02. Recovery includes financial compensation. Immediate funding of 80% through BNDES, with Brazilian government funds. Loans liquidated over the 3 year period as tariff increases are realised. Funding scheduled by December 15th. Elektro Ebitda impact of approximately R$191million or US$ 73 million. 2. April/May MAE settlement : Market will settle under current rules due to pre-rationing conditions, confirming the procedures used on Elektro's books. Impact of approximately R$ 18 million or US$ 7 million. 3. Parcel "A" for the future: All non-controlable costs to which LDC's are subjected to including power purchases, sector charges, are passed through to final tariffs either using a tracking account mechanism or by aligning adjustment dates with the LDC tariff revision date. Tracking account will be subject to financial compensation from the date costs are incurred until the effective pass through and collection , eliminating a major risk for the distribution sector. Elektro Ebitda impact 2002 forward of R$ 60 million or US$ 19 million, as had been considered in the 2002 plan. This methodology represents major risk mitigation going forward, as the initial power supply contracts are renewed starting in 2003. 4. Parcel A from the past: Min Parente has agreed to the concept recovering non controllable that were not passed through to tariffs since late 1999 using the same methodology agreed to for future recoveries and has a dedicated team from the Federal Attorney General's office targeting a final solution in ten days. Elektro impact is R$145 million or US$ 55 million in 2001. The proposed mechanism for recovery is after the 36 months for the rationing losses. We are currently finalising a memo of understanding and the government team is winding up the settlement with the generators in order to finalize the terms of the overall agreement. Min Parente has committed to resolving the open issues affecting investors in the power sector. These agreements represent a major step forward, significantly improving the value of our businesses. By solving the pending issues for the rationing losses, thus eliminating the Annex 5 controversy the MAE should function normally, allowing us to operate Eletrobolt and settle against the pool. Total amounts for the sector represent about R$ 10 billion or US$3.8 billion at the current rates. Our team has led the sector negotiations for months since the rationing, and have been instrumental in convincing the government of the need for implementing these changes.
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: ESA government negotiations
Attached please find Gas Daily daily prices for April/Oct 2001 for the Permian and Waha areas. The differential looks good for a support of our $.04 offer. Please let me know if you want me to pull more pricing information. TK
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: Permian to Waha Differentials for Socal Discussions
Here is what I'm looking at for July 1. Paul Leanza (Clinton) has a customer that can take around 1,000 day. I don't know if that's dt or mcf. I will use mcf for this email until someone corrects me. This customer has a special deal where the pool operator gets a fuel credit on every mcf the customer pulls. For July, assuming the gathering fuel is 5%, and this customer pulls 95 mcf from your production pool, you will get a 5 mcf credited back to your imbalance account the following month. I don't know how this works with trading imbalances. But, at a NYMX of $3.95 that works out to $.21 - sounds good to me. Paul said this customer is looking for a CNG Index Flat price or and equivalent basis number. Marde will not sell at that price but I will. Marde said she would charge ENA a $.03 fee for all the volumes flowing. Actually, I would prefer to move all the pool and production gas to EES, settle up financially with EES and be done with it. What we could do to test Paul's statement, is have the customer pull 300 mcf/day out of CES's pool for July. It would be easy to see since that is the only deal. AND, have EES take over the pool deal with Power Gas Marketing. Comments / Questions? Questions John 1. Heidi (EES) said you already have some Phillips production in EES's pool. Does CES still have metered production from Phillips in CES's pool? If yes, how many meters? 2. Please give me the following info for the activity behind Peoples Phillips Power Gas Marketing Term Price Volume Heidi (EES) If we find out from John that there is still metered production in CES's pool, please call Peoples and see if we can move the metered production to EES's pool for July. Heidi Boyd with CES said you could tell them that CES is going out of business and they may make exceptions for that. Marde I would prefer to move both supply customers over to EES, where EES makes the payments and bills either Clinton or Clinton's customer. At what price will you take these deals? I assume we need to get this info from John before you can anwser this.
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer:
Peoples