Q: FYI, it may be wise to run a few of your macros from Jeff's machine. I would just see if it runs and close without saving. PL
Propose a subject line
A: Windows 2000 Migration
IN: Louise, my expected value contribution for Q4 is $2.5 million. This is East Gas Mid-Market and Origination combined. This is per your request during our last meeting. Frank

Generate a subject line.

OUT: Q4 Earnings
IN: This is an email
Dear Mr. Kester, We are in receipt of your letter dated January 26, 2001, regarding a sponsorship opportunity at Energy West's Summer Energy Conference. Upon review, we have decided to decline participation. We thank you for extending the invitation to Enron and send best wishes for a successful conference. Regards,

What is the subject?

OUT: Summer Energy Conference
QUESTION: We have a new flag football season starting up in september. Let me know if you are still interested in playing. If you are, I need $5 from everyone.
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: New League
Jay, I changed the FTS monthly amount from $1,065 to $715 as previously discussed. It is effective Feb 20th. I need to change the amount transferred to account 586-61L86 from $150 to $175 and to account 586-61M19 from $175 to $200. I also submitted a transfer of $1,000 into my CMA account. I would like to transfer $500 each into account 586-94017 and account 586-94019. This is my 2001 contribution to the Education IRA's. Let me know if I need to do anything else. Also, when are the recharacterizations from Roth to Traditional going to take place? I will need a 1099-R for the transactions I think. Call me if you have any questions. Thanks. DG
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: Changes
When we do the emissions testing at C/S No. 3, Luepp, we should be aware of the positives and negatives. The positives being the information which Steve and company will collect. This appears to be a very useful tool. There is also is no permit emission limits associated with the permit at this facility. There also exists the potential to pay lower emissions fees should this investigation show that the emissions from the units to be significantly lower than what was placed into the permit application. The downside to this effort is that the data we collect may in fact show that our emissions fees which we have been paying actually under estimate those submitted in our application and we would more than likely be held accountable for the difference (1996 to the present). Additionally, enforcement action could result by the Navajos. I say this to apprise everyone of the positive and negative potentials involved in completing this study. From the emission estimates which were placed into the permit application we included a defendable buffer or excess of emissions to account for variations in the temperature, humidity, engine age and poor engine mechanics should they exist. And finally, we have the unknown of not knowing what the three units actually emit. These units have never been tested. This uncertanty in itself may be the driver to know so as not to have a situation which was similar to what happened at Atoka No. 3 several months ago.
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer:
Testing at Station 3