Question: Sentence A: Hersheimmer turned to him.

Sentence B: Hersheimmer moved slowly towards him.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question: yeah well i enjoyed talking with you and
You were interesting.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Problem: Here is a premise:
yeah i i i imagine a lot of it had to be fictional just to keep the FBI uh going i guess

Here is a hypothesis:
There were parts that were non-fictional.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Sentence 1: Pundits are wowed by his basic American- an American original (Mark Shields, NewsHour ; Tim Russert, Meet the Press ); an honest American (Shields, Capital Gang ); a genuine American patriot (Hunt, Capital Gang ); a genuine American hero (Dan Quayle, Fox News Sunday ); and the Bulworth of his generation (Clarence Page, ABC's This Week ).

Sentence 2: Page said everyone knew he was the Bulworth of his generation.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question:
The west corral is ready for your use as always.

Does it follow that "You can use the corral on the west, as usual."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
yes

Question:
Based on the premise "In the event that the Administrator is unable, for any reason, to promulgate allocation regulations on a timely basis, Section 424 provides a default method for distributing the allowances, without promulgation of regulations, in advance of the year for which the allowances are necessary so that owners and operators can plan for compliance.", can we conclude that " Section 424 does not provide any methods for distribution."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
no