In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.

Comment: It is tragic to watch what is going on south of the border. When a president elect yells at a reporter that his station is fake news [CNN] and refuses to answer the questions, we wonder if we are not in a modern 1933 Germany, when Hitler stopped most of the press. Right now, more than ever, we need a press that questions, investigates, reports on the actions of this shyster, more than ever. Please do not succumb to his tirades. Please continue to report the news as it is presented. Please continue to question and make this man and his republican cabinet accountable. God bless America.
Agree

Comment: What nonsense. It's 2017. No one needs a dead whale. There are ways of getting adrenaline that doesn't involve killing wild animals. Ever ace a test? Hit a game winning basket? Bungee jump?

Honor and respect the past, sure. But it's 2017. No one on this earth needs a dead whale.
Disagree

Comment: I do not disagree Teleology, and really this should be the first article in a series of science based pieces on the subject. But too often these days we get hundreds of 'anectodal opinion' pieces that promote the only 'correct' viewpoint society should have. These feel good groupthink pieces are largely spurious, fallacious or based on little reasoning or hard statistically relevant data. Thus, when an opposing viewpoint is published that in a mere few thousand words attempts to bring rigorous, rational and data supported thinking back to the debate; I for one applaud it, even if it is not 100% perfect or complete.

I do hope Ms. Soh is not silenced and continues to write such reasoned, data based and as objective as possible, articles.
Agree