Context:
Church Rummage Sale<br>The local church was having a rummage sale. It was raising money for a woman's shelter. Mike's pizza gave a pizza to everyone who donated. The church raised a lot of money. The shelter now has enough money to remodel their kitchen.
Hypothesis: The local church was having a pizza sale and everyone who donated received a pizza. OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No
No
Input: OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No

How to manage cash flow for a business<br>Write down your business's balance at the beginning of each month. Check your business's bank account to see how much cash you have on hand. You will need to do this for a few months before you have a good idea of what your cash flow is like.

Sentence: Checking your account will lead to a longer life.

Output: It's impossible to say
Problem:
Read the following paragraph and determine if the hypothesis is true:

Her husband, political novice Juan Carlos Lecompte, scrambles to preserve Betancourt's dream and sustain the Oxygen Green Party, the political party she founded.

OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No
Hypothesis: She founded the Oxygen Pink Party.
****
Answer:
No
[Q]: McKenrick said many firefighters avoid asking for help at work. That's why the GTFF acts as an outside, separate from the workplace resource, in hopes that they may one day break the stigma of mental health and firefighters realize it's okay to ask for help. Mental health is stigmatized. OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No
[A]: Yes
Problem: Next year is the 50th anniversary of the Normandy invasion, an event that wouldn't have been possible without the Liberty ships. The volunteers hope to raise enough money to sail the O'Brien to France for the big D-Day celebration.

Based on the paragraph above can we conclude that "It is good to remember our countries history"? OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No

A: It's impossible to say
Context:
Now, the most salient question then is, with respect to the reporters' appearance today, is it your understanding that the reporters are intending to invoke the same privilege cited by them yesterday, if called, when called, to testify by the plaintiffs?
Hypothesis: There were no reporters present today. OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No
No