In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.
Example: Comment: It's bad enough we already have all these American sicko's living in this country shooting up theatre, schools, churches, malls, etc., we don't have room for crazy muslims.
Example solution: Identity-attack
Example explanation: This comment contains identity attacks on both American and Muslim.

Problem: Comment: I think the bishops bit off more than they can chew with 'The Donald'. Although he did manage (with McConnell's assist) to make a Supreme Court appointment. The jury is out if Gorsuch is as much of a troglodyte as he is reputed to be. Somehow I do not see either Roe or Obergefell being overturned without a couple of additional replacement justices and that probability will become more and more untenable as we get closer to 2018 and beyond. If the Senate is retaken by the Democrats then we will have 8 justices if one dies or retires. The Democrats will pull a McConnell over screaming protests from the 'right wing'. The bishops, of course, will wring their hands asking for insurance for all but will not support single payer. The one-percenters are opposed to such an expansion and the bishops always heed their benefactors' calls.
Solution: Non-identity-attack