instruction:
In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: toxic and non-toxic. Toxicity is defiend as anything that is rude, disrespectful, or unreasonable that would make someone want to leave a converation.
question:
Comment: You're a fucking piece of shit idiot HRC supporting asshat. Hillary and idiots like you elected Trump by cheating Mr Sanders out of his rightful place as the Dem candidate. Here you are now trying to run your corrupt bullshit game on him some more. Go fuck yourself. This shit is your fault and you're trying to put that on the old, smart socialist Jew. Eat shit fucktard.
answer:
Toxic

question:
Comment: For the love of God, buy some humor (and self-awareness). It's satire.

Kurgan isn't actually demanding citations, OK? Think about it.
answer:
Non-toxic

question:
Comment: Proof of that?? Not to mention, most Catholics would likely vote for the church to uphold "traditional" teachings using the "traditional" definition of" traditional." The Rad-Trad cult is so small that very few Catholics even know it exists, otherwise they would NOT vote in support of such radicalism... thanks to Burke and company, however, this awareness is coming to the fore so that the militant culture warriors will be relegated to their rightful place right next to the other extremist groups we have had to endure.
answer:
Non-toxic