Here is an email: This is just a short update on the conference call just completed with Michael Adewumi of Penn State, concerning the PCB pipeline modeling project proposed for the Transwestern mainline system. David Roensch, Dr. Adewumi and myself discussed the latest proposal submitted by Adewumi and based upon his answers to the technical and operational questions, it appears that the model will yeild some useful information. Adewumi was asked about the simultaneous modeling of PCB's and arsenic and feels that the model can address this situation. He felt that by initiating the model to the pipeline segement selected for the study (between C/S 4 and C/S3) this information could be projected to the other pipeline segments with physical and elevational conditions not represented in the segment selected. As is the case with most projects of this nature, answers to some questions cannot be addressed until we begin the process. It appears that the next step in this process is to have Mike Terraso contact Michael Adewumi. David Roensch and I will be available to feed technical and operational information to Adewumi for his modeling input. It may also be in the best interest of this project to see a team of technical and operational experts from Enron and Transwestern begin a brain stroming of this project during the data input stage to address issues related to the field cleaning trials, both of the pipeline system and the C/S piping. By working through the process, we may be able to alleviate some potential concerns and increase the cleaning success. Although Transwestern has been involved in this type of cleaning for a number of years, based upon the liquids data results, the system has met with variable success. The more technical and operational information we can incorporate into the model, the better will be the modeling conclusions and results of the cleaning activity.
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: Conference Cal with Adewumi
Q: Confidential; Attorney client work product; Not discoverable Here is a rough draft. I will also start on TVA letter. Per my earlier vm, I am struggling with the benefit of a 2 year proposal vs. 7. I'm not sure if we get any "cap" benefit from making a seven year deal even if TVA doesn't accept our offers (benefit would assume that TVA has an obligation to cover entire position which is contrary to what our outside counsel has said in the past. According to Bob, since TVA is asking for specific performance, it may not be reasonable for TVA to cover entire period. I will try to talk to him tonight.). If TVA accepts one of our proposals and then we lose the termination argument, what do we do? Supply? Terminate Again? In either case our proposal for 7 years will likely not cap our damages. Let me know what you think. I'll be in early tomorrow. Thanks
Propose a subject line
A: Draft TVA memo to Delainey
IN: Been thinking about you, but figured you were busy. Asked the Jernigan's how you were doing and if your group was included in the filing. They said it was, you were trying to sell your group and that you didn't seem worried at all, which is good. Good Luck with that as I know it will be tough. On the bright side, if you sell it, you are a friggin hero for pulling off a deal in a tough environment. If you don't and go get another job, well that's what everyone expects anyway. Again, good luck, tell Lucci hey and have a Merry Christmas. ma

Generate a subject line.

OUT: What's up?
IN: This is an email
means the =01&Daily Midpoint=018 price set forth in Gas Dailyc (Financial T= imes=20 Energy), or successor publication, in the column "Daily Price Survey" under= =20 the listing applicable to the geographic location closest in proximity to t= he=20 Delivery Point(s) for the relevant gas day. If there is no single =01&Dail= y=20 Midpoint=018 price published for that particular Gas Day, but there is publ= ished=20 a "Common" range of prices under the above column and listing, then the Spo= t=20 Price shall be the average of such =01&Common=018 high and low prices. In = the=20 event that no =01+Daily Midpoint=018 price or =01&Common=018 range of price= s is published=20 for that particular Gas Day, then the Spot Price shall be the average of th= e=20 following: the price (determined as stated above) for each of the first Gas= =20 Day immediately preceding and following the Gas Day in which the default=20 occurred for which a Spot Price can be determined.

What is the subject?

OUT: Docs
QUESTION: Laurie, Thanks for your call. Attached is a redline version incorporating ENA and Cabot's revisions. Please give me a call after you have had a chance to review same. Regards,
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: Agreement
IN: Hey Gang, Attached are the physical curve mappings as provided by Russ Severson... Please take a peek and let us know if we need to change, add/delete, update any points/mappings going forward in a Netco environment... For instance, I would like to change Texoma to Carthage on the curve mappings... Also, I would like to delete all derived curves, leaving only Carthage, KatyTailgate, and Agua Dulce. The other physical locations would be ShipChannel, Waha and Katy (non-tailgate)... Let me know your thoughts... O'Neal 3-9686

Generate a subject line.

OUT:
Physical Curve Mappings_Sitara