**Per Tony at EPE, the following is new for 2002. I will attempt to get more information and pass it on as I receive it. ** First, TNP now has a 75 MW call on EPE. The schedule you see on the unit commitment was called in by PNM on behalf of TNP. Lets keep checking TNP schedules real-time to minimize inadverdant on this sale. Second, SPS exchange now is 130 MW light load, SPS provides EPE 130 MW at the Eddy tie and EPE returns the power 100 MW at PV and 30 at FC. Again, this schedule will have to be verified real time with SPS/PSCO. **The TNP schedule is verified with PNM and is delivered at Hidalgo. 25 is firm just like the last two years, 50 is econ. and can be varied by PNM each hour. ** Please ask if you have any questions. Thanks,
Answer: New EPE procedures.
Here is an email: Prepay for Dominion for April 2002 to be made on Friday, March 29th. I printed out the attached form and gave it to Doug Sewell. Prepay amount = 10,000 dth per day x 30 days x $2.1562 = $646,860.00
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: Dominion prepay for City of Tallahassee deal for April 2002
Q: Executive desktop support services have been streamlined due to recent organizational changes. The attached document outlines the revised service offerings. If you have any questions, please contact Carolyn Evans, executive support manager, at ext. 57520. We appreciate your cooperation in this matter.
Propose a subject line
A: Revised Services for Executive Support
IN: On October 17, 2001 Rockland Electric Company and PJM filed with FERC a joi= nt application for the transfer of operational control from the NYISO to PJ= M of certain facilities located in Northern New Jersey. The facilities are= the transmission assets in the Eastern Division of Rockland's service terr= itory. This includes approximately 400 MW of load in Bergen County, NJ and= transmission facilities that are already directly interconnected with PJM = (note that other Rockland facilities located in NJ, namely those in norther= n Passaic County and Sussex County (Rockland's Central and Western Division= s respectively) will not be transferred to PJM and will remain under the op= erational control of the NYISO since these facilities are not directly inte= rconnected with PJM nor with Rockland's Eastern Division). The filing requ= ests approval of the transfer by November 30, 2001 which would allow PJM to= take operational control on February 1, 2002 (the filing does not address = what, if any, changes to the operation date might be if FERC does not appro= ve this by Nov 30). Rockland Electric is a subsidiary of Orange & Rockland= Utilities which is a subsidiary of Con Edison. The transfer adds approximately 400 MW of load and 56,000 customers (mostly= residential and commercial) to PJM. There is no increase in supply, there= fore the total load of PJM is increased by 400 MW without any additional re= sources. The transmission assets include 138-kV (8.3 miles), 69-kV (35.9 m= iles) and 35-kV (12.4 miles) transmission lines and 11 substations (the fil= ing includes a detailed description of these assets). Let me know if you require any additional information.

Generate a subject line.

OUT: Rockland Electric Transfer to PJM
IN: This is an email
Virendra, Several books were set up in Risktrac will incorrect names. Is it possible to simply change the names of the books already set up or do we need to have new books set up? Thanks,

What is the subject?

OUT: Book Name Changes
John/Kam and Donnie/Casey, Attached is the proposed hierarchy for Day 1 of testing (Wednesday afternoon as I understand) - see "VaR Hierarchy" tab in the spreadsheet. Please confirm that my population of books is complete and accurate. Thanks, Vlady.
Answer:
Proposed Book Hierarchy