In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Example Input: Comment: I wonder what old white guys think is worse, having a black president or woman president. Up here in the chow halls it's been 7 plus years of its obamas fault that they are all neutered toothless hillbillies. It will be interesting to see and hear how they cry if a woman is elected president. A curious phenomenon occurs every time a black man walks in the chow hall, the loud crying about Obama stops. All loud and proud as long as no minorities are around.
Example Output: Non-obscene

Example Input: Comment: May these craven whores go down in ignominy with Trump.
Example Output: Obscene

Example Input: Comment: ctd..

I'm not saying there's any meaning or any lessons to be derived from this fact other than maybe the problem of hate/violence against identifiable groups based on religion, ethnicity, or whatever, goes beyond, or has got almost nothing to do with, debating in a responsible way the type of issues mentioned above.

I guess I am saying that if we censor or suppress a legitimate debate about these issues then the extremists and the crazy people will occupy the space instead.
Example Output:
Non-obscene