Question: Sentence A: That's why the chief food technician in the leading dairy cooperative in the country was reclining behind a giant mixing vat and desperately wanted to forget about the negative stimuli on his nerve cells caused by the 83 kilograms of his body.

Sentence B: The chief food technician wants to remember the positive stimuli that was caused from his body.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question: i said okay because i'm not a swimmer
I'm not a swimmer, I am black, so alright.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Problem: Here is a premise:
True enough!

Here is a hypothesis:
Accurate enough.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Sentence 1: and i think particularly if you're if you're looking at the at the at the peasant uh whether he's in Central America regardless of where he is is his life is his life better off under Communism or or uh or Democratic government you look at Salvador where the

Sentence 2: I completely believe that there is no benefit to Communism whatsoever.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: no

Question:
I have an irritation, not a problem, but I thought perhaps you could offer me a palliative.

Does it follow that "I thought you could offer me other things for my irritation. "?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
it is not possible to tell

Question:
Based on the premise "The 1) Serbs welcomed Jews into their anti-Nazi guerilla groups", can we conclude that "The Jews and the Serbs worked well together in the guerilla groups."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
it is not possible to tell