In this task, you're given a review from Amazon and rating for the product on a scale of 1-5 based on the review. The rating means 1: extremely poor, 2: poor, 3: neutral, 4: good, 5: extremely good. Your task is to generate whether the rating matches the review or not. Answer with "True" if the sentence belongs to that section, otherwise answer with "False"
Example: Review: These are junk! Both bulbs have burned out within a two month period!! I cannot believe that this company can be in business with such poor quality. I have used infrared lights for my ball python for many years now and I get a varied range of months from a bulb, but I have never gone through two bulbs in a matter of two months! I am very disappointed.
Rating: 1
Example solution: True
Example explanation: The user seems very disappointed in the product because the bulb they ordered has been burned out earlier than usual. So, he gave 1 star to the review considering it extremely poor. So, true is the correct answer.

Problem: Review: I've had several cases for my XS Max. Most from big name companies. They each have their pros and cons. Compared to the others, this UAG Pathfinder checks more boxes than any of them. Pros Lightweight Protective Tactile buttons Raised edges Great looks Tight fit Scratch resistant No fingerprints Precise cutouts (to accommodate asymmetrical speaker and mic holes) Cons Way too slippery Overall excellent case that I would recommend to anyone looking for one case that can do it all. ***UPDATE*** Sadly I had to return this case. I liked it for all the reasons mentioned above BUT I could not get past the slippery grip of this phone. If it were more textured or had TPU where the side grip pattern is it would help tremendously. I dropped the phone a few times by just by picking it up. The Monarch series is much grippier, but is just too bulky for a daily case in my opinion. I switched back to my Otterbox Symmetry until a better option comes along.
Rating: 2
Solution: True