Given a travel related situation, and given a specific question about the situation, summarize the question into a title
One example is below.
Q: The green carriage is of course first class. This would be our first preference with our 5 month old baby in lap, because of the presumably larger toilets for changing and whatnot. However, the baby being a Western white baby... will occasionally babble, screech or cry uncontrollably for a little while.

Speaking in terms of Japanese culture, should we avoid Green class tickets if we are taking aboard a potentially disruptive baby?

A: Japanese train etiquette: Is it acceptable to take a baby in the Shinkansen Green Car?
Rationale: A person gives a detailed description about a situation where they would prefer to travel on the Shinkansen Green Car but is doubtful if doing that would be against the Japanese train etiquette since they will be traveling with a baby. The question is summarized as Japanese train etiquette: Is it acceptable to take a baby in the Shinkansen Green Car? for easy indexing the next time someone searches for a similar phrase
Q: Most izakaya I've been to have the bartender standing on the other side of the bar, or even consist solely of a bar.

However, I've been to two places that called themselves an izakaya where the bartender is not on the opposite side of the bar. In one of them, the bar faced a wall, while in the other, the bar formed an oblong shape.

One of them seemed to be part of a chain of izakayas, which made me think it was an inauthentic rip-off of an izakaya, a place that was more izakaya-themed than a genuine izakaya. The other was in a touristy area of the touristy town of Takayama, which also made me suspicious that it was an inauthentic rip-off targeting people who wouldn't know what a real izakaya is like.

Are such places regarded as real izakayas?

A:
Are izakaya where the bartender doesn't stand opposite the bar inauthentic?