Detailed Instructions: In this task, you will be shown a prompt from a judicial decision and multiple holding statements derived from citations following text in a legal decision. Holdings represent the governing legal rule when the law is applied to a particular set of facts. There are five answer choices for each citing text. The correct answer is the holding statement that corresponds to the citing text. You should write an incorrect option. Even though there exist multiple wrong answers, we only need a single wrong answer. There is a <HOLDING> token in the position of the citing text prompt where the holding statement was extracted.
Q: the alleged negligence of an independent contractor. More specifically, GET argues that tour operators are not liable for the negligence of providers of transportation services. Corby, 1990 WL 488464 at 3. GET also cites numerous out-of-state cases which hold that tour operators are not liable for the negligence of third party suppliers of Grand European Inbound's safety because GET made an inquiry into the reliability of GEI, and used it without incident for more that 10 years before Ramage's alleged accident. B. Plaintiffs Opposition First, Ramage claims that waiver of defendant GET's liability is contrary to public policy, and thus unenforceable and void. See Cal.Civ.Code 1790.1. Ramage contends that he was not put on sufficient n Cal.App.3d 237, 240, 142 Cal.Rptr. 570 (1967) (<HOLDING>). Ramage contends GET expressly and impliedly
Holding statements: (A) holding that a summary judgment motion must stand or fall on the grounds expressly presented in the motion (B) holding that the courts denial of either a motion to dismiss or a motion for summary judgment is not a final judgment and is not reviewable (C) holding that if there is any issue of fact which remains upon a motion for summary judgment the motion must be denied (D) holding that in ruling on a motion for summary judgment the trial court is limited to the grounds raised in the motion (E) holding the denial of a motion for summary judgment on an issue which is later submitted to the jury is not reviewable
A:
holding that a summary judgment motion must stand or fall on the grounds expressly presented in the motion