Q: Attached for your review and comment, please find Defendant's proposed discovery requests: <<discovery requests.doc>> <<med.rel.doc>> Christine Neely, Secretary to Lynn Paul Mattson and Kristen L. Brightmire Doerner, Saunders, Daniel & Anderson, L.L.P. Information in this message may be privileged or confidential. Information is intended for the sole use of the addressee. No consent is given for unauthorized viewing or distribution. - discovery requests.doc - med.rel.doc
Propose a subject line
A: Casey v. NEPCO

Q: Jeff: Sorry this took so long but here are my thoughts on the above: 1. In Section 3.1 (c), I'm assuming that the additional sections were added because we will get these reps in another agreement from the Trust. Is that correct? 2. In Section 3.4 e), the new language regarding rescission of acceleration I think belongs after the phrase that begins, "if the effect of such failure..." Also, where did the new language regarding prepayments at the end come from? Is this in the Revolver or in Enron's existing deals? 3. Section 3.11 should be made subject to Section 5.7 or vice versa. Carol
Propose a subject line
A: Swap Assignment Agreement - April 20 Draft

Q: Hi Chris! I followed up with the same IRS representative I spoke with in November regarding your missing cheque. I wish I had better news for the holiday season. Three traces were placed on your missing refund cheque and three times the trace has been rejected. The IRS doesn't know why. They are placing a formal inquiry into the matter. The representative I spoke with has admitted that somebody on the IRS' end isn't doing what they are supposed to be doing and he promised me they'd get down to the matter. I can only tell you that I will follow up again in January of the new year. In the meantime, have a very Merry Holiday Season and a Wonderful New Year! Best regards,
Propose a subject line
A: IRS refund--update

Q: To date, we have migrated approximately 7300 users from Lotus Notes to Microsoft Outlook in North America. As we bring this migration to a close over the coming months, we would like to remind you, the Outlook user, of a few very important policies. 1. As Corporate policy states, Global Technology Infrastructure is monitoring the use of Internet eMail, which includes sending mail to and receiving mail from the Internet. 2. There is an eMail retention policy, which provides as follows: Message Location Maximum Retention Inbox 30 days Sent Mail Folder 30 days Trash Rollover from Inbox for one day Folders All eMail messages placed in folders will be destroyed after one calendar year There will be no exceptions to this policy. 3. We will be including a legal trailer or disclaimer message to the bottom of every outgoing Internet eMail. The legal disclaimer text is as follows: "This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you. " For questions, please call the Resolution Center at ext. 31411.
Propose a subject line
A:
ATTENTION OUTLOOK USERS - EMAIL POLICIES