instruction:
In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.
question:
Comment: Such is the ways in which we have decided as a society as to how we we deal with misfits; those who march to the beat of another drum; those we can "put away" for not following the "norms" that have been established; those who are annoyingly bothersome; those who can't follow the rules; those with some find of deficiencies deemed difficult to handle, etc. Do we consider these means to be the most effective and successful ways in dealing with these "problems"? Sure doesn't seem like it, but, we seem to go on our merry way heading in this direction. How come?
answer:
Non-identity-attack

question:
Comment: While Muslims excoriate us about supposed Islamophobia, we should bear in mind Islam's entrenched xenophobia, homophobia, misogyny, Judeophobia and antisemitism, , Christophbia, Europhobia, Americanophobia, democraceaophobia, iconoclasm, and even Islamophobia against each other. Islamic sects are worse than anything expressed in the west, even by Trump
answer:
Identity-attack

question:
Comment: "That's not what she's talking about."

It has happened to me a couple of times. I assume it is a SIGN from either the Holy Spirit or Cardinal Burke telling me my comment was stupid, heretical, irrelevant, blasphemous, etc. Or maybe that is just delusion of grandeur on my part.
answer:
Non-identity-attack