You will be given a context and a verb separated with a newline character, and you have to answer if the given verb can be anchored in time or not. We say a verb can be anchored in the real timeline if and only if a verb happened in the past, is happening now, or is guaranteed to happen in the future. The output should be "Yes" if the verb can be anchored in time and "No" otherwise.
Example: It was followed by Denmark, Norway, Germany, France, Greece, Luxembourg, Spain, Britain, the United States, Iceland, Belgium, Italy, Portugal and Turkey. NATO decided at last year's Madrid summit to (invite) the three eastern European countries to start accession talks.
Verb: invite
Example solution: No
Example explanation: This is a good example. The "invite" is not anchorable. Although NATO decided to invite them, they haven't invited them yet, and it's not guaranteed to happen in the future. They might change their decision later.

Problem: And we must be resolute in spelling out the consequences of intransigence, she added, referring to the threat of NATO air strikes against Milosevic if he does not agree to the deployment. But in many ways, the day belonged to the Czech Republic, Hungary and Poland, who in order to meet NATO's standards have had to cut the size of their Soviet-style militaries, organize civilian control of their armies and agree to (buy) NATO compatible equipment in the coming years.
Verb: buy
Solution: No