Sentence 1: But this inference oversimplifies Starr, just as he oversimplified the scandal.

Sentence 2: Starr did not have input on the scandal.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: no

Question:
This device is a visual counterpart to the firing of the One O'Clock Gun at the Castle.

Does it follow that "This device provides visual stimulation to go along with the sound of the gun."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
yes

Q: If What's completely intolerable is to be accurately quoted and seen--even by yourself--to be no better than you actually are., can we say that "It is bad when you are quoted correctly and can see yourself as the same as you are. "?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A: yes

Premise:
"over in um can't really tell you what part of the what part of the town it was in but it was it's supposedly known it was up by one of the colleges anyhow"
Hypothesis: It was a part of town near one of the colleges.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

yes

input question: We think that Microsoft's actions have been entirely normal competitive behavior. If this premise is true, does that tell us:"We think Microsoft's hacking of other countries is completely normal."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: it is not possible to tell

Q: If Taylor asks., can we say that "Taylor had a statement."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A:
no