input question: Tom takes aim at Lana, but the bullet misses because John shoves him. If this premise is true, does that tell us:"The bullet misses Lana, so Tom aims again."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: it is not possible to tell

Question:
Based on the premise "As Scandinavians and Bavarians cycle by, 1968 seems as remote as when the first cattle-herders came here from the other side of India some 3,500 years ago.", can we conclude that "This part of India was uninhabited until 2,500 years ago."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
no

Question: Sentence A: well a lot of times it's you know a lot of times it's not the money that keeps people that keeps people

Sentence B: Money does not always make people stick around.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Question: To begin with, it threatens to pit the world's most powerful man against working women in general, a theme assiduously promoted by Whitehead.
Whitehead does not want men to fight with working women.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Problem: Here is a premise:
Half a second.

Here is a hypothesis:
Half a second is all the time I need.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question:
For the remaining puzzle is why the world provided LTCM with so much money to lose.

Does it follow that "The remaining puzzle is not a deciding factor to the outcome of the LTCM. "?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
no