IN: Sara, I wanted to follow up with you to find out if you are still planning to send an example contract to me for transactions involving RMT. If you plan to send it interoffice mail, I am in EB 1709. Thanks,

Generate a subject line.

OUT: RMT Contracts
IN: This is an email
Attached is a spreadsheet which shows the counterparties that have been sent letters. We are in the process of researching and re-faxing letters which came back as "busy" on the fax. You will see that those have not been marked as being sent. Call with any questions. Kim Theriot x. 31771

What is the subject?

OUT: Spreadsheet Outlining Counterparty Letters
QUESTION: I'm sure that many of you are aware that there has been a great deal of activity lately related to Enron's evaluation of possible acquisitions. John Goodpasture's group has kept a large number of ET&S people engaged in looking at a number of potential deals. While these deal evaluation projects have become routine around here, we all must remember that these projects are extremely confidential. Even after a potential seller has announced that it is up for sale, the fact that Enron is looking at a potential deal, as well as any of our internal analysis of the deal, remains strictly confidential. I realize that many of you have ongoing business relationships with employees of some of the companies that we have evaluated or may evaluate in the future. If you find yourself in such a situation, and a business contact at the target company asks whether Enron is evaluating the contact's company or assets, the only appropriate response is that Enron personnel are not permitted to discuss potential acquisitions. Please be aware that the confidentiality agreements that we typically sign as part of the acquisition evaluation process preclude any communication by Enron people with employees of the target company. If you have any questions or concerns regarding this requirement, please do not hesitate to give me a call. Thank you for your assistance. DF
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: Confidentiality Regarding Acquisitions
Group, As most of you are aware we changed time zones on Sunday. We are back in Pacific Standard Time. As such, we are once again in a different time zone than some of our counterparties. Please specify Pacific time zone in your summary of your deal at the end of each phone call--translate the deal to Mountain time only if necessary. We must be very clear on this going forward or disputes will be numerous and we will not be able to resolve them. See me if you have any questions regarding this expectation.
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: Time Change
Dave, I am going to send Shawn your way - he has extensive development, asset and project finance experience. I would like him under your supervision to manage our coal power development strategy - like we discussed it could be a very robust strategy with multiple exit points. I strongly believe that coal needs to come back into the stack and that the existing development teams (Parquet & Jacoby) are already buried under mid-stream gas development opportunities. This would incorporate acquisitions, development, technology, asset sales, emissions credits & technology, fuel supply and power sales. Please update your 2001 budget to incorporate this new iniative. Regards
Answer: meeting
Q: Attached is the summary of this Accounting and Reporting NOPR proposing additional reporting requirements for financial instruments. The NOPR is hyperlinked to the word document. Comments are due on March 11, 2002. Please review and designate whom you would like to participate in developing comments, if any. This may not have any material impact on us. Please advise Tony Pryor or myself of your designee by next Tuesday, January 22.
Propose a subject line
A:
NOPR - Accounting and Reporting of Financial Instruments - RM02-3