Given a paragraph about movies and a set of conversational questions and answers about the paragraph, say whether the passage contains sufficient information to answer the follow-up question. Say Yes if it is answerable; otherwise, say No. The paragraph has the prefix 'CONTEXT:'. Each conversation question has a prefix 'Q:' followed by the answer prefix 'A:', and the follow-up question has a prefix 'FOLLOWUP_Q:'.

[Q]: CONTEXT: Oskar does not become a vampire in the book. It is Hakan who becomes a vampire in the book. Also in the book, it is disclosed that Eli is a boy who was castrated years ago when he was converted to a vampire. In the movie, neither Hakan becomes a vampire nor is Eli disclosed to be a boy. Oskar and Eli flee. And as atm mentions in the comment, Oskar will grow old just like Hakan. <sep> Q: What happened to Eli and Oskar in Let the right one in? A: neither Hakan becomes a vampire nor is Eli disclosed to be a boy. Oskar and Eli flee. And as atm mentions in the comment, Oskar will grow old just like Hakan Q: Can you tell me anything else about this movie? A: Oskar will grow old just like Hakan Q: Is there anything else you can tell me? A: Eli is a boy who was castrated years ago when he was converted to a vampire <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Oh wow, I see, why was he castrated?
[A]: No

[Q]: CONTEXT: Recall how Marcelle does the final preparations for setting the theater on fire - he blocks the auditorium doors with a crowbar and then proceeds to behind the screen and starts waiting for Shoshanna's "message" to appear on the screen. Before he does so the two men from the Basterds leave the auditorium and proceed to some side corridors to get to the side balcony and attack Hitler. Some time after they leave the auditorium Marcelle comes to the doors and blocks them. The balcony where Hitler sits with Himmler has a separate door guarded by two German soldiers. The two Basterds kill the guards, rush into the balcony and shoot Hitler. Right after that the "message" appears and Marcelle sets the pile of films behind the screen on fire. So the balcony doors are not blocked - Hitler likely can escape the theater or at least gain some time and space and have better chances to have been resqued. He definitely has much better chances than those people who are in the auditorium - those are blocked between the locked doors and bursting flames - but he is at least not in the auditorium and so less exposed to the dangers and has a chance to use the side corridors to escape. The two Basterds shooting him on the balcony make that totally impossible. <sep> Q: Would Hitler have died in the fire anyway if the Basterds hadn't shot him? A: the balcony doors are not blocked - Hitler likely can escape the theater or at least gain some time and space and have better chances to have been resqued <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: What did the basterds do?
[A]: Yes

[Q]: CONTEXT: This irks me too, but I'm certain it's done to convey to the audience that the character is actually drinking. It's one of those tropes that people have become accustomed to, even though it isn't realistic. It's similar to the trope of "every time you turn on a microphone, it whines with feedback for a second, then settles down." Not realistic, but it clearly shows the audience what's going on. <sep> Q: Why does TV shows always make a full drink sound like an almost empty one? A: done to convey to the audience that the character is actually drinking Q: Is it a good technique? A: This irks me Q: Is it realistic? A: it isn't realistic Q: Why do, they use this technique? A: it clearly shows the audience what's going on <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Is it misleading?
[A]:
Yes