In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine the neutral choice based on your inference from the statement and your commonsense knowledge. The neutral choice is a sentence that neither agrees nor disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3', corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence. If sentence X agrees with sentence Y, one's correctness follows from the other one. If sentence X disagrees with sentence Y, they can not be correct at the same time.

[Q]: Statement: That gentleman nodded approval. Choices: 1. The man nodded a yes. 2. The man never nodded. 3. The man nodded and waved.
[A]: 3

[Q]: Statement: oh you should have used it you wouldn't have been liable for the payment Choices: 1. If you used your credit card you wouldn't be liable for the payment. 2. You wouldn't have been liable for the payment if you used it. 3. The big red fox jumped over the blue and green fence.
[A]: 1

[Q]: Statement: If Finkelstein were to apply his logic to Lee Atwater's Willie Horton strategy, he'd have to write, Not race but crime served as the prime scapegoat of George Bush's 1988 campaign. Choices: 1. With Horton's strategy, crime can bee seen as the main patsy during Bush's 1988 campaign. 2. Blaming minorities was George Bush's main reason for problems during his 1988 campaign. 3. Horton's strategy was central to Finkelstein's views on the prime scapegoat of Bush's 1988 campaign.
[A]:
3