Demonstrate a technique does not imply it is a baseball lesson.. So what could be the question?
Question followed by answer: Premise: "A gentleman in the background watches the gentleman in the foreground demonstrate the technique for playing a game at the park on a sunny afternoon."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "The man watches the baseball lesson in the park." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
it is not possible to tell

Boys are a child and if there is something on each side of the baby then it means the baby is in between two things.. So what could be the question?
Question followed by answer: Premise: "A baby is seated between two young boys on a seat."
Hypothesis: "A child is sitting on each side of a sitting baby."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
yes

Boy cannot be riding horse and a sled at same time.. So what could be the question?
Question followed by answer: Given the sentence "Little boy on a green sled goes over a hill of snow as the sun sets." can we conclude that "The boy is riding a horse."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
no

It cannot be assured that people at table are bored coworkers and the one looking out is in anticipation.. So what could be the question?
Question followed by answer:
Premise: "Two people have their heads down on a table while a man in a brown jacket looks out the window at a group of bikes and motorcycles."
Hypothesis: "Two bored coworkers sleep off their dead shift while another coworker watches a group of bikes outside in anticipation."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
it is not possible to tell