In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

Example Input: Comment: Enough of this! Grab your plackards, it's time to protest! "What do we want! Hall of fame Bowlen! When do we want it! NOW!" Seriosuly, this is crazy. The man should have been selected this year. I truly believe this is east coast crap once again. Beathard is deserving and in no way am I taking away from him, but had he not been connected to Washington, he would not have been nominated yet.
Example Output: Non-identity-attack

Example Input: Comment: This Hitler argument is stale...arming people with military style weapons not only supports the crazy, it reflects our inability to understand why the vast majority of police favor the reasonable regulation of firearms ownership. They would also like to see regulation ammunition that's relates to the ability to kill them regulated. None of this minimal regulation would limit your freedoms...Canada has resonance gun regulations, Australia bans a number of styles of weaponry...they they both seem okay. The difference? Fewer gun deaths, fewer crazies with arms, and a clearer commitment to community safety. It's your children, our police, the neighbor down the street that desires reasonable consideration.
Example Output: Non-identity-attack

Example Input: Comment: Lets not get bogged down in the minutia here. All of these cuts that are listed in this article are luxury items. When the country is in dept of the tune of ~19 trillion in operating cost and ~ 200 Trillion in unfunded liabilities and the state of Alaska is ~4.5 billion in the hole, it is absolutely criminal and crazy to sit here and talk about luxury items that I pay for with my tax dollars, like they are essential rights that the government should pay for. You can have all the funding you want when you are in the black. But when you are in the red, which we are and will be for generations to come superfluous spending is insane. I applaud the budget cuts, not because I support the President, but because of plain and simple economics. You cannot sustain anything when you don't have the money. And we don't have the money. Also our Congressional delegates are saying what you want to hear. If they can't see the writing on the wall then they are fools that will enable the downfall.
Example Output:
Non-identity-attack