Question: My suggestion would be to drop the rules against conflicts of interest in favor of a simple one that says material biases should be disclosed.
I would suggest that we keep the current rules against conflicts of interests exactly the way they are.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Problem: Here is a premise:
Contribution and cost coverage change to reflect those differences.

Here is a hypothesis:
There are no differences to account for.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Sentence 1: Never knowed any li'l boy what warn't glad to see th' last o' a book.

Sentence 2: Little boys like reading because they think reading is boring.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question:
Javea has been proclaimed environmentally nearly perfect and you can bask in the Costa Blanca's brightest sunshine here.

Does it follow that "Javea is famous for its natural features."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
yes

Q: If it's it's it's so easy anyway for everybody to just kind of become a yes man and get carried up along with the emotions and so if there's somebody who's strong enough to stand up with a specific doubt i would a whole lot rather go through the expense of another trial because of a hung jury than that a justice not be meted out correctly, can we say that "If a juror is not convinced, he must stand by his convictions rather than risk convicting an innocent person."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A: it is not possible to tell

Question: Suppose, then, that when Starr approached him, Taylor had strung the prosecutor along, not overtly lying, but milking him for information while only pretending to be interested in the job.
Starr bypassed Taylor and approached Dailey about the job instead.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer:
no