Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.

Example input: This is what I read when it comes from an EWEB commish, 'Shut up and take it!'
Example output: Yes
Example explanation: The comment has term 'commish' which is an insult, also the phrase 'shut up and take it' is insulting as well. The comment is classified to be insulting. Hence, it is a positive example
Q: The solution Randall was provided by Professor Johnathan Gruber of MIT who wrote most of the ACA for the Obama crowd. And as you recall his recorded comments were that the American public is so stupid they will buy into the programs even though it raises all costs, does not improve health care delivery, and there are not enough doctors to service the basic system. It wasn't enough that Obama illegally stole 600+billion from MEDICARE to help pay for the illegal program, that theft of dedicated funds still has not been corrected by the courts but some issues have. So just where is Mrs. Martell/Murkowski going wrong?
A:
Yes