Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.

Example Input: Gee, a 3 and 1/2 "minute" working session in the Senate. Mr Senate President, I would agree with you and your totally arrogant and idiotic statement. The People of this State gave all of you lazy puds 90 days to get er done and yet you totally ignore it! Now all efforts at anything have stopped because the House is playing politics. Yes the issue is important, but if the steak isn't done, you can still eat a salad while you wait! Or you can mow the lawn, anything but suck out of the trough and whine!

$12,500 per day? Flying home for the weekend and not getting back for work on Monday? In the real working world you would be Fired! You in Juneau have become as big a joke as our National Congress.

I suggest another voter initiative, one which would stop all per diem after a 90 day session! Another option would be sequestering all legislators in a motel 6 until the job is done. Bread and water only! Disgusting!
Example Output: Yes

Example Input: Hercules: If one follows your logic, he or she should "star" each and every comment. Everyone's imput is valuable. Starring a comment, as I've seen it applied on this site, does, in fact, represent agreement with that comment. BTW: I see you failed to "star" my comment. Does that mean you feel my imput on the issue of smoking in County Parks is not valuable? Up to this point in time Mr. Bozievich hasn't "starred" my comment. Does that mean he feels Outsider's imput is valuable, but mine isn't? Gosh, now my feelings are hurt.....
Example Output: Yes

Example Input: #discriminationforjesus
Example Output:
No