In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

[EX Q]: Comment: Maybe he is looking forward to meeting the 72 virgins in Paradise...
[EX A]: Non-obscene

[EX Q]: Comment: In other words, you had no idea that, proportional to population, cops shoot white folks about half as often as they shoot black folks.

So you can't play this game. You don't have the ante.
[EX A]: Non-obscene

[EX Q]: Comment: The people of "the Agenda" can claim as much as they want that they value differences but the truth is, they want to KILL the differences. Be smart! Instead of man and woman acknowledging their differences and living in harmony as equals (that would be the true gender equality) the Agenda wants to KILL the differences between man and woman and role out thousand different gender orientation so that soon the notion of gender will disappear; and man and woman are seen as literally equal beings. Respecting the differences wouldn't require first the full acknowledge of the biological differences between male and female? If you don't acknowledge it, you don't respect the differences - you just want to KILL them.
[EX A]:
Non-obscene