Question: Sentence A: Providing Access to Regulatory Supporting Materials

Sentence B: Regulatory supporting materials should be able to be accessed.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Question: one who is not high-stepping through Neiman Marcus.
Someone not high stepping in neiman Marcus.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Problem: Here is a premise:
The smithy's jaw dropped "We need them," said Jon.

Here is a hypothesis:
Jon spoke gently to the smithy.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Sentence 1: okay yeah i know where Panhandle is that's north up there isn't it yeah

Sentence 2: Panhandle is up north; I know where it is.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: yes

Question:
(The event is repeated on 14 15 August. )

Does it follow that "The event is held again on the 14-15 of August. "?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
yes

Question:
Based on the premise "Auditors should include in the report the audit objectives and the scope and methodology used for achieving the audit objectives.", can we conclude that "Auditors should not put objectives in the report."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
no