Q: Indian Point 2 is expected to go into a midcycle outage starting this Friday (10/26/01). We anticipate they will be down for about two weeks. We will keep you updated as they are getting a lot of heat from the NRC and have a lot of pressure of the former Con Edison employees to perform, that are now working for Entergy.
Propose a subject line
A: Indian Point 2
IN: Take a look at this. Note that this does not address capacity release issues. I think that might be too much for this letter. I think we should take that up separately. Probably, an ad hoc basis is best to start with. For example, I think we should work with Marc of FPU on an individual basis and see what happens. Then we would be able to feel more confident on whether to call a meeting on this or not.

Generate a subject line.

OUT: DVC Letter
IN: This is an email
Attached is the final draft of this paper for comment. It incorporates the comments of those who responded but there is time for further redrafting. However, given the filing deadline (Wednesday) further changes are likely to be wordsmithing unless someone vehemently objects to the structure. regards

What is the subject?

OUT: Updated EPMI/EES draft ICAP paper
QUESTION: Per our discussion this morning, below is a summary of items to discuss with Glynn: Adding Enron's "negative CTC claim" to the list of claims: PGE's filing included a list of top twenty creditors. Our negative CTC claim was apparently not taken into account in compiling that list. The list is nonbinding, however. PG&E will be required to file schedules of creditors on April 20. Our negative CTC claim should be on Schedule F (for unsecured claims). You may want to remind Glynn of your previous conversations and state our expectation that the negative CTC claim will appear (preferably as uncontested) in the April 20 filing. (Note: if PG&E does not include the claim we have an opportunity to file a proof of claim and ultimately the court determines the validity of the claim). Including Enron on the Creditors' Committee: PG&E may have the opportunity to influence representation on the creditors' committees. There are several reasons to suggest to Glynn that we be included: 1) we are a big creditor, 2) we could be helpful in crafting a broader solution, and 3) we are one of the real parties in interest behind the PX and ISO (who were listed as significant creditors but are really just "passthroughs" for the suppliers ... and PG&E likely would not want to have those political bodies serving on the creditors committee anyway).
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: Call to Bob Glynn
I bet Martin is going to have a different Company Code and Legal Cost Code than London. His info in the computer also isn't complete. Can you track that down for me. Thanks!
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: Martin Rosell
PG&E will announce via press release very early next week an open season on Redwood, Baja and Silverado. It comes in direct response to recent announcements of expansions into California by pipelines. The bid protocols will be structured similar to original open season from the original Gas Accord. The open season will start on June 1 and end on July 31. Capacity will be available starting 1.1.03. Bidders will be able to bid up to 30 years (PG&E states that that's what generators want). Accompanying the announcement will be another announcement that PG&E will expand Redwood by 200mmcf/day, which they hope to have available by 1.1.03, or some time during Q103. About 2-4 weeks after the open season begins, PG&E will file its proposed "Gas Accord II," (the first one expires end of 02). As part of that filing, PG&E will offer its proposed ratemaking treatment for the next five years (beginning 1.1.03). PG&E will not include in the open season 1) core capacity and 2) certain EAD contracts that extend beyond the Gas Accord 1 end date. In addition, PG&E will hold back an additional 20% (after excluding core and EAD), to be "open-seasoned" at some "future" date. The capacity to be auctioned is: 1) 900 mmcf/day on Redwood, 2) 245 (annual) on Baja, plus an additional 200/day in summer on Baja, 3) 155 on Silverado. How PG&E will market the 20% they intend to hold back, and when they might auction it off in the future will be discussed in PG&E's Gas Accord II filing. No single company will be awarded more than 30% of the capacity on any specific path in the primary open season (though firms can bid whatever level of capacity they choose). Please forwad along to anyone else who might be interested. If you have any questions, just holler. Best,
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer:
More Info: PG&E to Announce Open Season on Redwood and Baja Early Next Week