[QUESTION] Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "A construction worker working on a railroad waring an orange shirt."
Hypothesis: "A construction worker sits in an office."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
The worker working on a railroad is presumably outside and not at sitting at an office.
The answer is no.

Q: Premise: "Two construction workers in orange safety vests and tan khaki shorts."
Hypothesis: "Walking past orange road cones and a large city truck."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A: Two workers are walking past a huge hole in the street.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

QUESTION: If "A man in a black jack wearing glass is having a conversation with someone across the table." does that mean that "A man with glasses is having a conversation."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Let's solve it slowly: A man (in black jack) with glasses is having a conversation as part of the total description.
The answer is yes.

[QUESTION] Premise: "A horse rider struggles to stay on their mount."
Hypothesis: "A rider getting on a horse."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
The horse rider is struggling to stay on mount so the rider has gotten on the horse.
The answer is no.

Q: Premise: "A young girl is climbing a rock wall."
Hypothesis: "A young girl fell down off the rock wall."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
A: A girl who fell down off a rock wall can't be climbing a rock wall at the same time.
The answer is no.

[QUESTION] Given the sentence "A girl in a plaid shirt is jumping in front of a bench." is it true that "A girl jumps off the high dive."?
A bench wouldn't be near a high dive and she wouldn't wear a plaid shirt to jump off the high dive.
The answer is no.