Given a paragraph, generate a claim that is supported by the given paragraph. 1) The claim must contain information from within the paragraph. 2) A sentence within the paragraph can be used as a claim. 3) The claim should not have contradictions within the paragraph. 4) The claim should be at most one sentence long.

Example Input: In November 2018, the "Weird Facts" Facebook page posted a widely-shared meme which outlined the death of Joyce Carol Vincent, summarizing it as "In 2006, a woman (Joyce Carol Vincent) was found in her London flat, skeletonized, after 3 years of being dead with the TV still running": Notwithstanding the somewhat crass imagery used in the meme, this was unfortunately a largely accurate description of the tragic circumstances surrounding the death of Joyce Carol Vincent, who did indeed remain undiscovered at home for around two years, dying around December 2003. According to material prepared for release to the news media by the Metropolitan Police, as well as reports by the BBC and the Press Association, the following are the known facts surrounding Vincent's demise. Some readers might find the details disturbing. On 26 January 2006, Vincent's remains were discovered at her apartment in Wood Green, north-east London. Workers from the Metropolitan Housing Trust, an organization which provides affordable housing and is now known as Metropolitan Thames Valley, had forced entry while attempting to inquire about thousands of pounds of unpaid rent arrears. Vincent had been placed in the small apartment as part of a scheme for victims of domestic violence. Vincent's remains were badly decomposed, and pathologist Dr. Simon Poole later described them as being "largely skeletal," which supports the claim made in the "Weird Facts" meme. According to evidence heard at a coroner's inquest, Vincent was found lying on her back on the floor of her living room next to a shopping bag and Christmas presents which she had wrapped but never delivered. Her television was indeed still switched on when Vincent was found. She was identified by reference to dental records. Based on the expiration dates of food and medication found in Vincent's flat, it was estimated that she had died around December 2003, some two years earlier not three years earlier, as the "Weird Facts" meme and several news reports mistakenly stated. She was born in London to Grenadian immigrant parents in 1965, and was 38 years old at the time of her death. In the years after Vincent was discovered, the filmmaker Carol Morley tracked down her friends, colleagues and associates. In interviews which would ultimately form the basis of the 2011 documentary film Dreams of a Life, those who knew Vincent universally recalled their shock and disbelief at the circumstances of her death and discovery. In the film some friends recounted actually having read news accounts of her death in April 2006, but without an accompanying photograph, they did not connect the horrific circumstances of her discovery with the person they had known. According to those accounts, Vincent had for many years been a very social, popular professional young woman who worked in London's fast-paced financial district in the 1980s and 1990s, was highly intelligent and charming, and was remarkably attractive and frequently the object of male attention. Vincent, who was at one time an aspiring singer, was acquainted with the soul vocalist Betty Wright, and had dinner with other iconic musical artists, including Gil Scott-Heron, Jimmy Cliff, and Ben E. King. In 1990, Vincent briefly met and conversed with Nelson Mandela backstage at a concert in London's Wembley Stadium. Although she had many friends, Vincent's friendships appear to have been somewhat fleeting, and despite the deep affection in which she was held, she was known for "drifting" in and out of social groups and relationships and sometimes appeared troubled. Her acquaintances recalled that she was distant towards her family members. According to Morley's interviews with friends of Vincent, she became engaged to marry an unidentified man in the late 1990s, and the Metropolitan Police later noted that she had been involved in a "domestic incident" in 1998. In Morley's documentary, Vincent's friends observed that she was likely to have been in at least one abusive relationship during that time. By 2001, Vincent left her job at the accounting firm Ernst & Young and progressively lost contact with her family members, friends and former colleagues, working for a time as a cleaner. She changed addresses frequently but moved into her final apartment in Wood Green in February 2003, having been placed there as part of a women's refuge program for victims of domestic violence. Her friends have speculated that she may have become isolated and withdrawn over time because she was ashamed of the abuse she had suffered and the shift in her professional and personal circumstances, and she may also have been avoiding detection by an abusive former partner. In November 2003, she was briefly hospitalized after vomiting blood and was diagnosed with a peptic ulcer. Although she is believed to have died around a month later, the coroner was unable to arrive at a cause of death due to the decomposition of her remains by January 2006. She also suffered from asthma, which was cited by her friends as a possible cause of death.
Example Output: In 2006, the skeletal remains of Joyce Carol Vincent were found in her home, with the television on, years after her death.

Example Input: Since 2011, Pugh received $500,000 selling her illustrated books to the University of Maryland Medical System, a $4 billion hospital network that's one of the largest private employers in the state. Since the arrangement was exposed by The Baltimore Sun earlier this month, she's stepped down from the volunteer board and returned her most recent payment of $100,000 for the hard-to-find books. She also defended her actions and portrayed press inquiries as a "witch hunt." A Democrat who became mayor in 2016 and represented some of Baltimore's poorest areas in the state's Senate before that, Pugh is the public face of the still-unfolding debacle. But the Baltimore mayor who served on the UMMS board since 2001 and once sat on a state Senate committee that funded the major health network is hardly the only influential Marylander connected to the board or the medical system facing questions. One-third of the UMMS board members received compensation through the medical system's arrangements with their businesses, a revelation that Gov. Larry Hogan has called "appalling." Two other members of the board also resigned, and four others went on voluntary leave while the system reviews governance practices. The president and CEO of the University of Maryland Medical System has recently been sent on a temporary leave of absence. Maryland Comptroller Peter Franchot said Tuesday that an independent audit is urgent to understand how many "self-dealing" arrangements there have been over the years. In Pugh's case, there needs to be a thorough examination of whether a product was actually delivered, he said. "I describe it as juvenile, this arrangement where she was providing or not providing books no receipts, no contracts, no procurement. It was simply a $500,000 gift to her from the University of Maryland Medical System," Franchot asserted in a phone interview. The slim "Healthy Holly" books, sharing tips on nutrition and exercise, were meant to be distributed to schools and daycares. However, the Sun has reported that 50,000 copies are unaccounted for, leading to widespread speculation that a good chunk were never printed in the first place. In recent days, fewer than 9,000 copies were tracked down collecting dust in a warehouse of Baltimore's school district, which has described Pugh's children's books as "unsolicited" donations. The city library system, daycare programs and booksellers can't find copies. "Healthy Holly: Exercising is Fun" is unavailable on Amazon, where the only reviews for the book are entries of people savaging Pugh's ties with UMMS. In a written statement, Pugh has defended her lucrative book deal with UMMS, saying it started as a passion project. "I recall passing the time by thumbing through the first book before an UMMS meeting. One my colleagues loved it and thought it would help advance children's health," she said in a recent statement. Pugh has since cancelled all public appearances and her spokespeople say she was hospitalized over the weekend with pneumonia. They say she will address the matter more once her health improves. Criticism of UMMS and of Pugh who faces a 2020 Democratic primary for re-election in a city dominated by a single party's political machine has been intense. The Washington Post's editorial board asserted the UMMS had a "get-rich-quick program" for many of its board members, with Pugh's involvement painted as an egregious case of "political sleaze." Meanwhile, UMMS and Pugh have not provided clarity on the whereabouts of the 100,000 copies of the "Healthy Holly" series books or definitive proof they were published and distributed. A spokeswoman for the university-based health network says their communications team was "working hard on all of the inquiries." The medical system had classified the "Healthy Holly" purchases as grants in federal filings. Some critics say the various statements made by Pugh and others regarding the arrangements with UMMS board members are absurd on so many levels that it's hard to know where to begin. "Whatever Pugh does, she is going to be operating under a very, very big cloud for a long time," said Donald Norris, professor emeritus of public policy at the University of Maryland Baltimore County. "This is an unethical lapse of humongous proportions $500,000 worth." ___ Follow McFadden on Twitter: https://twitter.com/dmcfadd
Example Output: Baltimore mayor's $500K book deal draws intense criticism.

Example Input: She is in a bind because of her persistent refusal during two straight presidential debates to say whether she would raise taxes on the middle class to pay for the universal health insurance plan known as "Medicare for All." By not acknowledging taxes would almost certainly increase for a wide range of income earners, Warren avoids becoming a caricature of a Democrat itching to raise them. But she also threatens to undermine the image she's fostered of a plainspoken former professor ready to tackle any issue in her quest to protect the middle class from the excesses of corporations and the wealthy. Warren's progressive rival, Bernie Sanders, has said middle-class taxes would have to rise to pay for Medicare for All. Other White House hopefuls said Wednesday that Warren should be just as direct. "Look, I'm not picking on Elizabeth Warren, but this is ridiculous," said former Vice President Joe Biden, currently Warren's chief competitor for the Democratic nomination. Warren "is going to have to tell the truth" or face questions about her willingness "to be candid and honest with the American people." Minnesota Sen. Amy Klobuchar said Warren "needs to come forward and say" how she'd pay for a new health insurance system. "I'm sure she will eventually," Klobuchar said. Pete Buttigieg, the mayor of South Bend, Indiana, echoed that thought from the campaign trail in Ames, Iowa. "Everybody should be prepared to defend their plans," he said Wednesday. "It's serving us well to be very clear about how our plan works and to lay out the fact that it's paid for." Warren argues pundits are missing the point by focusing on taxes instead of the bottom-line cost that Americans pay for their health care. She insists that eliminating premiums and co-pays under Medicare for All would lower overall costs for all but wealthy Americans. Her top supporters say she should keep pressing that message. "Democratic voters are actually very appreciative that, on the substance, she wants to bring down health care costs, and, on the politics, she's not taking the bait and giving Republicans and the insurance industry the TV ad moment that they want to deceive voters," said Adam Green, a liberal activist and close Warren ally. Still, the lack of specificity on paying for Medicare for All is tricky since Warren famously is the candidate who "has a plan" for everything and proudly sweats even the smallest, wonkiest details. On health care, she says that she's "with Bernie," referring to the Vermont senator who authored the Medicare for All legislation in Congress. Warren's campaign says that no one yet knows Medicare for All's final price tag but that Warren is still "reviewing the revenue options" previously suggested by Sanders and that she has been very consistent and clear in saying she'll pay for it by adhering to the principles of lowering overall costs for middle-class families and raising them for rich people and major corporations. Democratic presidential candidates traditionally go to great lengths to avoid the idea that their party is tax happy. But being blunt about raising taxes is not necessarily an election loser, as long as their effect is targeted. President Barack Obama was reelected in 2012 following a pledge to raise taxes on top earners and did so by allowing previous tax cuts on the wealthy to expire. And Warren's promises of a 2% wealth tax on households with a net worth of more than $50 million elicits chants of "2 cents!" at her rallies, bolstering her reputation as an economic populist. The generous benefits Warren is promising surpassing other countries with government-run health care would require tax increases of a historic magnitude to guarantee cradle-to-grave care for every U.S. resident, however. And that will make it harder to finance the program with surgically targeted tax increases on corporations and the wealthy. A study released Wednesday from the Commonwealth Fund and the Urban Institute estimated the government would need $2.7 trillion in additional revenues if Medicare for All were fully implemented next year. That's more than half the current federal budget, and Washington is already borrowing heavily to meet its obligations. "It's a huge tax increase," said Urban Institute health economist John Holahan. "If you just lay it on a small group of people, how do you get those numbers?" Targeting income brackets also means necessarily picking winners and losers and a person's health status at any given time could determine what side of the ledger they wind up on. "The success or failure of major health reform plans always hinges on who would win and who would lose, and we don't have the detail for the Medicare for All plans to judge that," said Larry Levitt, a senior health policy expert with the Kaiser Family Foundation. Support for Medicare for All has fallen slightly since the beginning of the year, even as Warren and Sanders have championed it. An October poll by the Kaiser Foundation found 51% of Americans favor the plan, while 73% said they support a public option that would compete with private health insurance. Among Democrats, support for a public option has outpaced support for Medicare for All, 85% to 71%. A public option is backed by more moderate Democratic hopefuls, including Biden and Buttigieg. Traditionally, the U.S. has paid for social insurance programs with broad-based taxes. Medicare's financing includes a payroll tax, money from the Treasury's general fund and premiums paid by seniors. Sanders has laid out some options for Medicare for All, including a payroll tax on employers, a "premium" tax on households making more than $29,000 for a family of four and higher taxes on the wealthy which is further than Warren has gone in explaining where the funding will come from. Releasing a more detailed health care proposal of her own could at least start to address these issues for Warren. But her advisers have long maintained that, while she may eventually do so, it isn't imperative. "What resonates is not an academic version of her plan it's her personal story of struggle connecting with the real-world impact of her plan on everyday families," Green said. "Medicare for All is about the principles, not the micro-mechanisms for putting it altogether." ___ Associated Press writers Emily Swanson in Washington, Hunter Woodall in Keene, N.H., Thomas Beaumont in Ames, Iowa, and Julie Carr Smyth in Columbus, Ohio, contributed to this report.
Example Output:
Warren, candidate with the answers, dodges tax hike question.