Q: Ted, Attached is a revised draft of a letter. Please review and let me know if you have any comments. Please note the following with respect to this issue: 1. We should make sure we have performed a gas analysis at each producers delivery point and are sure they are creating or contributing to the quality problem. I recommend attaching such gas analysis to this letter. 2. The BRG Petroleum Corp. contract doesn't give us any cause to send this letter. The contract requires BRG to meet the quality specs. of the the pipeline which receives the gas downstream of the Point of Delivery on the Confirm. Such Point of Delivery is at the wellhead and HPL is the downstream pipe. HPL's specs (unless they have changed, don't have a limitation on gas richness). 3. The Texlan letter will be slightly modified from the attached, since we will reference Force Majeure. 4. Do we have a accurate list of producer names and address? If you are okay with the letter, I can have a paralegal prepare the letters with addresses.
Propose a subject line
A: Nacogdoches Letter

Q: John, The new products have been built and are in the process of being mapped to Sitara and Tagg. I'm working with Melba Lozano (EOL contact) and she tells me they should be ready tomorrow. Mark Taylor and I haven't spoken yet about simplifying the language in the product long description, so I'll try to get with him tomorrow. For now, we're staying with the existing language which isn't really that bad. Any of these products which are intra-month will stay in the swap filter as US GAS DAILY products, but longer than intra-month will be in the basis filter as US GAS BASIS products with the format: US GAS BASIS GD/D SoCal - HHub The only product that will be different is the Nymex to daily swap which will be: US GAS BASIS NXL1 - GD/D HHub Any questions or comments, Fletch x3-6219
Propose a subject line
A: New product update

Q: I am from the Associate/Analyst department and I am sending out this test email. If you are no longer an associate or analyst, or would not like to receive future information please let me know, so that I can remove you from the distribution list. If there is someone you know that did not receive this email please have them to email me. thank you,
Propose a subject line
A: Test email

Q: At Mark's request, I am transmitting proposed changes to the collateral=20 arrangement language in the Online GTC's. Please let me know if it meets= =20 with your approval. 8. Collateral Arrangements. Counterparty shall (at Enron=01,s request) fr= om=20 time to time and at Enron=01,s option either: (i) within one Business Day = of=20 such request by Enron, provide to Enron a letter of credit in respect of=20 Counterparty's obligations under any Transaction, in such form and for such= =20 amount and from such issuer, as is acceptable to Enron in its absolute=20 discretion; or (ii) within such period as is specified by Enron, provide fo= r=20 the benefit of Enron a guaranty from a party, in such form and for such=20 amount as is acceptable to Enron in its absolute discretion. Failure so to= =20 provide such letter of credit or guaranty or any default under such letter = of=20 credit or guaranty shall constitute a default hereunder giving rise to the= =20 immediate right of termination by Enron under this Transaction.
Propose a subject line
A:
Revised Online Collateral Arrangement Language