input question: As discussed further in text box 4.2, if the projected budget surpluses materialize, the federal government will reach a point at which the projected surpluses will exceed the amount of federal debt available to be redeemed. If this premise is true, does that tell us:"There is no surplus in the federal government."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: no

Question:
Based on the premise "Grey scree slopes dominate both sides of the pass, which only sheep seem to be able to move acrosewith ease.", can we conclude that "Sheep are known for their agility and flexibility. "? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
it is not possible to tell

Question: Sentence A: yeah but it's it's nah you don't count on Social Security but it's it's that's what i'm saying they need to do something else

Sentence B: There is no security in social security.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question: no involvement in finances whatsoever you know and so when i became an adult and i was responsible for
"Before I became an adult I wasn't involved in finances."
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Problem: Here is a premise:
A Current Services Assessment provides receipt and outlay data on the basis of projections of future activities.

Here is a hypothesis:
A Current Services Assessment is 98% accurate at predicting costs using projections of future activities.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question:
Corporations have responded by funneling millions into ANC campaign coffers.

Does it follow that "The response of corporations has been to donate millions into the ANC campaign."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
yes