Q: On July 26, 2001, FERC issued an order conditionally approving the proposed tariff for the Neptune Project, which will consist of several thousand miles of undersea high-voltage direct current transmission systems connecting Main, New Brunswick and Nova Scotia to the capacity-constrained markets of Maine, New York City, Long Island and Connecticut. As a merchant transmission facility, Neptune proposed to assume all the risk of the the project. It proposed rates effectively capped by market forces. Conditions on the Commission's approval: - Neptune must join an RTO adjacent to or containing the geographic area of its proposed faciliteis and must place operational control of its facilities under the RTO. - Service must be provided pursuant to the Order No 888 pro forma tariff (Commission denied Neptune's request for a waiver). - Neptune cannot negotiate bilateral transactions prior to conducting its open season; it must make all capacity available solely through the open season process. If you would like any further information, please let me know.
Propose a subject line
A: Neptune Project order (ER01-2099)
IN: I've changed deal 547478 to reflect the correct price - $109.90 off peak and $174.15 on peak - and made a note in our deal correction report. Please keep me informed on any discrepancies you run across. I'll be happy to look into it. Thanks,

Generate a subject line.

OUT: EES Deal Change
IN: This is an email
To confirm our conversation, can you add "Credit Derivatives" as a new products to my database. We will need the same drop downs as the other produsts (gas trading, financial trading, etc.). Thanks!

What is the subject?

OUT: EOL Legal Database
QUESTION: Assuming we keep Arthur Anderson on board this afternoon and assuming Enron is still in the business of doing asset monetizations like this one (which better be the case since its in the TW 4th Q plan @$2.5 mm), the following things need to happen on roughly the following timetable: 1. Mike talks to Hanover and we negotiate the price, specific contract language, etc. (hopefully within 2-3 weeks of turning Mike loose?) 2. Regulatory (assisted by Maria and me) flanges up the FERC abandonment filing and tees it up to file the minute Mike finalizes the deal with Hanover. We haven't talked about this for a while, but the story we tell FERC has to acknowledge that the monthly O&M cost will be higher under our outsourcing deal than it currently is, if load factor and other operating assumptions remain constant. That may be the key to our story line--we
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: TW Compressor Monetization
Citizens is initiating the process to terminate our agreement. They will likely recall the capacity on TW and terminate our agency relationships with EP and TW. They want to know if we are continuing to deliver gas. Can you call Sean and tell him? C
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: Citizens
I don't see any problem with this transaction since it appears to be limited to Louisiana assets, but the issue of whether we are impacted by the noncompete agreement strikes me as a commercial call. Please let me know if you have any problem with the transaction and I will pursue it. Thanks. DF
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer:
LRC Joint Venture