Question:
Based on the premise "they had things that were similar to the Olympics uh the Czechoslovakian Turner Society did so it was it was exciting we competed on the rings and balance beam", can we conclude that "I thought it was exciting when we competed"? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
yes

Question: Sentence A: It's happening all over.

Sentence B: It's not reached anywhere.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question: But Ron Nehring, director of national campaigns for Americans for Tax Reform, a conservative group that's pushing paycheck protection very aggressively--and whose leader, Grover Norquist, has discussed the issue extensively with George W. Bush--says what McCain's for isn't really paycheck protection.
According to Ron Nehring, McCain doesn't really care about paycheck protection.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Problem: Here is a premise:
And then?

Here is a hypothesis:
And before that?

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Sentence 1: (Music swells ...)

Sentence 2: Music grows.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: yes

Premise:
"At the far end of this plaza stands the Kumari Bahal, the house of the living goddess, which was built for the Kumari in 1757 and is guarded by painted lions with long wavy hippie-style hair."
Hypothesis: The Kumari Bahal is located in the center of the plaza.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
no