Question:
Based on the premise "As for never swearing, Prudie takes the Fifth.", can we conclude that "Prudie takes the Fifth for never swearing."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
yes

Question: Sentence A: It certainly produces no evidence of malice.

Sentence B: The defendent's argument provides no evidence of malice.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question: Don Cazar the Mexican officer raised a gloved hand in a beckoning gesture " por favor, Excellency... this one, he is of the Blood?" Hunt Rennie joined Oliveri.
The Mexican officer waved over the men to ask about the horse, Rennie joined him and answered all his questions.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Problem: Here is a premise:
The Grand Bazaar is open 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. , Monday to Saturday.

Here is a hypothesis:
The Grand Bazaar is closed on Mondays.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Sentence 1: we're in uh as i said a small town in Indiana and it's a WASP community with a student body of five hundred in the high school so the setting is very different than it would be in

Sentence 2: There are five hundred students in the high school of the town.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: yes

Premise:
"So great is the pressure on the available land that most of Hong Kong's colonial architectural heritage has been demolished and replaced by new skyscrapers."
Hypothesis: The colonial architecture of Hong Kong had been demolished.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
yes