Problem: Here is a premise:
The great innovators are all Matisse, Picasso, Kandinsky, Duchamps, Pollock, Rauschenberg, and Francis Bacon, as well as the sculptors Brancusi, Arp, Tinguely, Giacometti, and Claes Oldenburg.

Here is a hypothesis:
Pollock, Rauschenberg, and Francis Bacon were great sculptors.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Sentence 1: But they conclude that all the choices available to Witztum and Rips created wiggle room, thus permitting the authors' biases to corrupt the results.

Sentence 2: All the choices created wiggle room.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: yes

Question:
oh so there was a history of that

Does it follow that "There is a history of abuse."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
it is not possible to tell

Q: If His name has been submitted to the Senate for confirmation, and organization officials expect Subia to be approved in the next few months., can we say that "At some point within the next several months, officials from the organization are anticipating Subia's approval."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A: yes

Premise:
"It should be noted that ISO 9000 does not guarantee a quality product."
Hypothesis: ISO 9000 can only produce products on request.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

it is not possible to tell

Sentence 1: so i want to get a new uh four eighty six chip but uh i don't know

Sentence 2: I don't even care about the new four eighty chip.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer:
no