instruction:
In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.
question:
Comment: There seems to be plenty of corruption in Washington DC, and established political sycophants routinely come out on the wrong side... Yet our media seems fixated on chasing accusations or facilitating myths.

Drain the swamp!!!
answer:
Non-sexual-explicit

question:
Comment: My original post to which you responded, was in the context of revolution. Did you miss that?
It seems to me that you're filling in some blanks with fantasy. I have no intention of starting a civil war, a revolution, of invading anyone's home, or killing someone because his or her political points of view differ from mine. In the light of recent events, it seems that it's more likely progressives who kill their ideological adversaries.
However, should there be a civil war between progressives and conservatives, I'd be supporting the conservatives in all ways of which I'm capable. I sincerely hope it never comes to that.
To be really clear, I do consider progressivism to be a social/political cancer that if allowed to grow will eventually kill the host.
answer:
Non-sexual-explicit

question:
Comment: What we need a national discussion about is why this newspaper hasn't condemned Turkey, a NATO ally, for banning a pride parade, locked up journalists and lawyers and sent its thugs to attack legitimate protestors on American soil. The g&m is an anti-China propaganda mouthpiece.
answer:
Non-sexual-explicit