Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
--------
Question: The perfect example of the complete dysfunction of the Board of Game process and ignorance of the Alaska Constitution. "Balance? We don't need balance. We want it all and to heck with the interests of the large majority of Alaskans and visitors who do not hunt." They are so scared of losing any control over their killing of moose and caribou. I guess other Alaskans and visitors don't spend any money in Alaska in pursuit of viewing wildlife as opposed to killing it? I encourage Governor Walker to appoint a non-consumptive user to the Board after the legislature adjourns (if they ever do....).

Answer: No

Question: The money = speech plus corporations = people are monumental mistakes. For me it's a matter of fairness and equality. Why should some people/entities get more free speech and influence than anyone else? It feels wrong in the marrow of my bones. It's part of why we are in the mess we are in both nationally and statewide.

Answer: No

Question: We have here a story with a minimum of information and yet posters project their own world views on the situation to determine that the "the cost effective route to keeping society safe from these creeps is execution.. tough love." So we see that with almost no information we are willing to consign an individual to death. If indeed that man has a long history of actual abuse of children or others, he should have offending organs surgically removed. Resulting altered hormone levels may allow his effective integration into society.

We are told that sexual orientation is hard wired. So it is useless to call offenders creeps. On the other hand, rewiring the hardware could alter behavior. More productive.

Answer:
Yes