Question:
Based on the premise "yeah oh yeah they've got a they've got basically a uh you know a lock on a lot of the market", can we conclude that "They got a lock on a lot of the market, about 75% of it."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
it is not possible to tell

Question: Sentence A: But if we cited your telephone number instead, we wouldn't be violating copyright laws--even though Web surfers could hear the same recording by dialing the number.

Sentence B: We wouldn't violate copyright laws by telling your phone number because you don't own that number.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question: The Alexandrians reject the polls in favor of a 1996 3,500.
The polls were fair.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Problem: Here is a premise:
Timing the Assessment

Here is a hypothesis:
Timing the Assessment and the Conclusion

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Sentence 1: I am staying as well, said the Kal.

Sentence 2: The Kal was going to stay for two more weeks.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Premise:
"Freedom of Information Act of 1966 (Public Law 89-554) a This law established the right of public access to government information by requiring agencies to make information accessible to the public, either through automatic disclosure or upon specific request, subject to specified exemptions."
Hypothesis: It was hoped that the Freedom of Information Act of 1966 would encourage greater trust in government.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
it is not possible to tell