Answer the questions at the end based on the text.

(CNN) -- Jurors did not reach a verdict in their first day of deliberations Monday in the trial of Steven Hayes, the man accused of killing three members of a Connecticut family in a 2007 home invasion.

They are expected to resume their work Tuesday morning.

Hayes, 47, who has pleaded not guilty, is on trial in New Haven, Connecticut, for the murders of Jennifer Hawke-Petit and her two daughters.

The killings took place in the New Haven suburb of Cheshire early July 23, 2007. The home of William Petit, his wife, Hawke-Petit, and two daughters was invaded in the middle of the night by Hayes and co-defendant Joshua Komisarjevsky, prosecutors say.

Komisarjevsky will be tried separately.

Judge Jon Blue gave instructions Monday morning and told the jury: "You are the sole judges of the facts."

"We're in the home stretch," the judge said after going over all 17 counts with the jury. "No one will hurry you to produce a verdict."

Their first duty will be to pick a foreman, and their verdict must be unanimous, the judge reminded the jurors.

Soon after starting their deliberations, the jurors asked for a transcript of an interview by a state police detective, who spoke to Hayes soon after his arrest. The judge offered to have the testimony read back -- which the jurors declined.

Later in the day, they sent a note to the judge asking for a definition of what constitutes starting a fire.Their deliberations Monday ran just over 2 hours.

1. Who is on trial?
2. How many is he accused of killing?
3. On what date?
4. What month of that year?
5. How old is he?
6. Did he have an accomplice?
7. Who?
8. Is he also facing trial?
9. Together with Hayes, or seperately?
10. Where did the killings take place?
11. What city is it a suburb of?
12. At whose home?
13. How many counts is Hayes facing?
14. Did he plead guilty?
15. What day of deliberations just finished?
16. On what day of the week?
17. Was a decision made?
18. How long was their deliberation?
19. What information did they request?
20. What does the jury need to decide on, first?

Numbered answers:

A: 1. Hayes
2. three
3. 2007
4. July
5. 47
6. yes
7. Joshua Komisarjevsky
8. yes
9. separately
10. Cheshire
11. New Haven
12. William Petit
13. 17
14. no
15. their first
16. Monday
17. no
18. just over 2 hours
19. what constitutes starting a fire
20. a foreman

Answer the questions at the end based on the text.

The National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) is an independent agency of the United States government charged with preserving and documenting government and historical records and with increasing public access to those documents, which comprise the National Archives. NARA is officially responsible for maintaining and publishing the legally authentic and authoritative copies of acts of Congress, presidential proclamations and executive orders, and federal regulations. The NARA also transmits votes of the Electoral College to Congress.

The Archivist of the United States is the chief official overseeing the operation of the National Archives and Records Administration. The Archivist not only maintains the official documentation of the passage of amendments to the U.S. Constitution by state legislatures, but has the authority to declare when the constitutional threshold for passage has been reached, and therefore when an act has become an amendment.

The Office of the Federal Register publishes the Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, and United States Statutes at Large, among others. It also administers the Electoral College.

1. Who admins the Electoral College?
2. Does it publish anything?
3. What?
4. Who overseas the operation of the National Archives?
5. Does he maintain anything official?
6. Who can pass amendments to the U.S Constitution?
7. What authority does the Archivist have to declare?
8. Is the NARA an independent agency?
9. What is it charged with preserving?
10. Does it increase or decrease public access to them?
11. Who do those records comprise?
12. Can NARA declare something legally authentic?
13. What does it transmit?
14. To whom does it send them?
15. Are the copies of acts it publishes authoritative?
16. What type of proclamations does it publish?
17. What type of orders?
18. How about regulations?
19. Does the NARA do anything for the Russian government?
20. Who is the chief official that overseas it?

Numbered answers:

A: 1. The Office of the Federal Register
2. Yes
3. the Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, and United States Statutes at Large
4. The Archivist of the United States
5. Yes
6. state legislatures
7. when the constitutional threshold for passage has been reached, and therefore when an act has become an amendment.
8. Yes
9. government and historical records
10. increases
11. acts of Congress, presidential proclamations and executive orders, and federal regulations.
12. Yes
13. votes of the Electoral College
14. Congress
15. Yes
16. presidential
17. executive orders
18. federal
19. No
20. The Archivist

Answer the questions at the end based on the text.

Criminal Law is the body of law that relates to crime. It proscribes conduct perceived as threatening, harmful, or otherwise endangering to the property, health, safety, and moral welfare of people. Most criminal law is established by statute, which is to say that the laws are enacted by a legislature. It includes the punishment of people who violate these laws. Criminal law varies according to jurisdiction, and differs from civil law, where emphasis is more on dispute resolution and victim compensation than on punishment.

The first civilizations generally did not distinguish between civil law and criminal law. The first written codes of law were designed by the Sumerians. Around 21002050 BC Ur-Nammu, the Neo-Sumerian king of Ur, enacted the oldest written legal code whose text has been discovered: the "Code of Ur-Nammu" although an earlier code of Urukagina of Lagash ( 23802360 BC ) is also known to have existed. Another important early code was the Code Hammurabi, which formed the core of Babylonian law. Only fragments of the early criminal laws of Ancient Greece have survived, e.g. those of Solon and Draco.

In Roman law, Gaius's "Commentaries on the Twelve Tables" also conflated the civil and criminal aspects, treating theft ("furtum") as a tort. Assault and violent robbery were analogized to trespass as to property. Breach of such laws created an obligation of law or "vinculum juris" discharged by payment of monetary compensation or damages. The criminal law of imperial Rome is collected in Books 4748 of the Digest. After the revival of Roman law in the 12th century, sixth-century Roman classifications and jurisprudence provided the foundations of the distinction between criminal and civil law in European law from then until the present time.

1. Name a couple of things that crime endangers?
2. How is most of it started?
3. What does that mean?
4. Does it cover punishment?
5. In civil law what corresponds to criminal laws punishment?
6. Have people always seen a difference between civil law and criminal law?
7. Who put the first laws into code?
8. When was the Code of Ur-Nammu put into effect?
9. By whom?
10. What was he?
11. Which country used the Code of Hammurabi?
12. Do we have anything left from
13. Did Rome draw a line between civil and criminal law?
14. What was furtum?
15. They treated it as what?

Numbered answers:

A:
1. the property, health, safety, and moral welfare of people
2. it's established by statute
3. that the laws are enacted by a legislature
4. yes
5. dispute resolution and victim compensation
6. no
7. the Sumerians
8. Around 21002050 BC
9. the king of Ur
10. the Neo-Sumerian king
11. Babylonia
12. Only fragments of the early criminal laws of Ancient Greece
13. yes
14. theft
15. as a tort