Question:
Based on the premise "oh yeah that's it oh yeah there's that's a weakness there that's just you know you you always want to get your kids everything and uh you don't care how much it costs or what it takes", can we conclude that "The cost of the items your kids desire doesn't matter much to you as you want to get them everything."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
yes

Question: Sentence A: As you drive south from Dijon, be sure to get off the main road, the N74, onto the parallel D122, signposted as the Route des Grands Crus (Route of the Great Vintages).

Sentence B: As you travel south from Dijon, there is a sign post stating the Route des Grands Crus.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Question: In the case of this president, it is.
It's the president's case to defend in front of the court.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Problem: Here is a premise:
However, in recent years, as figure 4.1 illustrates, private saving-which is the major component of nonfederal saving-declined as federal saving rose-which is consistent with the Ricardian equivalence hypothesis.

Here is a hypothesis:
Figure 4.1 shows that saving behaviors in recent years support the Ricardian equivalence hypothesis

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Sentence 1: Rennie nodded.

Sentence 2: Rennie was in agreement.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Premise:
"With the advent of the Mughals in 1526, Delhi alternated with Agra as the capital, and each ruler asserted his particular taste in architectural caprice."
Hypothesis: Each subsequent ruler picked one of the cities based on what his advisers told him.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
it is not possible to tell