IN: This is an email
Drew, I've attached my proposed changes to the Red Cedar contract. Our beloved Min/Max Language became a bit problematic, as you can see. I'd welcome your comments on this.

What is the subject?

OUT: more Red Cedar
QUESTION: Paul, Hope you had productive meetings in London. Any idea what the team is planning for Lakshmi? If possible, please call me on my cellphone. Regards,
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: Hi!
Jeff, I don't know if our group needs anyone, but I wanted to pass this resume along. I worked with Carlos when I was at EECC, and I rate him highly. He'll take on anything, has good people skills, works hard, and has a varied transactional background. As an added bonus, he is fluent in Spanish. EECC is being plopped into EES, and Carlos would prefer to make the move to ENA (or EA, whatever we are called). He discussed this with Vicky, so she is aware that he is checking out opportunities here. Thanks,
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: Opportunities at ENA
Errol, I looked at your post ids 1405076 (Nov 16) and 1403081 (Nov 15). For a Gas daily swap deal, its gamma, vega, theta, rho, drift, 2nd order should be zero. The change between today and prior day comes from forward value of new deals, changed value of old deals, curve shift of old deals, and liquidation of old deals. We can put it in a simplified formula, Today Value - Prior Day Value = New deals + Changed Deals + Curve Shift - Liquidation of old deals If you look at the gas top page, its liquidation actually includes both existing deals and new deals. The liquidation value for existing deals are 444,192 and liquidation value of new deals is -33,500. The Liquidation of new deals does not contribute to the daily change, so we got -33,502 off here.
Answer: adjustment of swap deals on GDaily top page
Here is an email: Dear John - The attached worksheet has my perspective on how the tolls should be escalated. I still think this is a conservative view, since I feel that we would be able to go to these pipes and negotiate a fixed toll for the remainder of the term, or even negotiate out of these contracts for a fee. (I'd love to take a crack at that!) TCPL is still a wild card, and I did not change the escalations that were shown. More will not be known with them until they get through their new rate design process, which will probably be another year (since they haven't even filed anything yet). Call if you have any questions.. Julie :-) 35591
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: Sithe Demand Charge Escalations
QUESTION: Kim- Here is the August spreadsheet. These are the changes I've made so far: I changed the formula in column R I added in the new contracts for August The differences between my model and the invoice are the way that they calculate the actual gas flow to Malin (column L on mine and column Z on theirs); It also appears that they do not include the Redwood credit. Looking at my model now, I also don't remember what the calculation in column D is for. It seems kind of unnecessary to me and doesn't make much sense. I know this is a lot of stuff to look at. If you don't understand what I just wrote, ask me and I'll explain what I'm trying to say. Thanks,
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS:
Palo Alto Invoice--Aug 01.xls