Problem: Here is a premise:
Poirot approached and stood over him.

Here is a hypothesis:
Poirot left him and stood under him.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Sentence 1: Without them, we would not have saved our homes.

Sentence 2: Out homes would be saved without them.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: no

Question:
Or, if not tenure, their goal might have been the eternal fame associated with having your name on an important piece of human wisdom.

Does it follow that "Very few succeed in having important piece of human wisdom associated with their name."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
it is not possible to tell

Q: If The reason is that it diverts attention from something called enterprise, by which Keynes means the development of real operating businesses., can we say that "Real operating businesses include Google and Apple"?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A: it is not possible to tell

Premise:
"at a couple a dollars an hour to take care of them on those Thursdays throughout the summer so"
Hypothesis: It costs a bit to have them watched on Thursdays but that's a good compromise for us.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

it is not possible to tell

Sentence 1: The doors were bolted, our own eyes have told us that, yet the presence of the candle grease on the floor, and the destruction of the will, prove that during the night some one entered the room.

Sentence 2: The doors were wide open.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer:
no