IN: There is a volume discrepancy for deal # 117853/YK6095.1 as reported in Sitara and TAGG. Please take a look at this deal. Also, is anybody working on a special contract for this deal as it is a 2-year deal attached to a GTC. Thanks for your help,

Generate a subject line.

OUT: Kennedy Oil (Deal # 1178533) - Discrepancies
IN: This is an email
Below is a summary of the discussions last week regarding the complaint against El Paso for oversubscribing the Socal Topock Point. The meeting started out by summarizing the dollar impact of the Border cuts to Amoco and Burlington of $3 million dollars and the additional fuel costs of $15 million that they have incurred when the mainline fuel was reduced and the gathering fuel was increased. Accordingly, producers are seeking a minimum of $17 million in compensation in some form or another. The biggest concern is that a total of 1.2 bcf/day is being nominated at the Socal Topock which can only deliver 540000 mmbtu/day. Socal Gas stated that this problem should go away when there system becomes unbundled (referred to as Gatekeeper).. The proceeding is currently pending CPUC approval and could be implemented as early as October 1, 2001. When the Gatekeeper is implemented , only 540000 mmbtu/day will be accepted at the Socal Topock border and must match up with the intra-state transport. SoCal Gas suggested taking the 1.2 bcf/day of nominations at the Topock delivery point and divide it up based on the original intent of the capapcity- 400 to Mohave; 540 to Socal Topock; and 180 to PGE Topock. They also stated they would accept less than 540 at Topock but needed a minimum of 300 to meet core needs. However, they wanted some type of compensation if their volume was reduced. They also agreed to live with the status quo until the Gatekeeper was implemented. This would result in firm rights being established at Socal Topock based on downstream rights. Williams owns Block 3 capacity and is willing to look at a CD reduction or a reduced take requirement or use of alternate points with a rate adjustment. After much discussion, El Paso came back with the following counter proposal: Recommended interim solution until Socal Gatekeeper implemented. Does not relate to receipt point rights. 1) Block 1 Capacity will always be alternate to Socal Topock (198000); 2)Block II Capacity can not be sold at PGE Topock (614000) 3) Amoco and OneOk each have a contract 45000/d which can go to Topock or Ehrenberg. It is recommended that they give up their Ehrenberg right and keep Topock right and Socal will give up like amount at Topock as well as shift an additional 70000 mmbtu/day from Topock to Ehrenberg resulting in approx. 115000 being shifted to Ehrenberg. 4) Rights fro expansion shippers would be carved up as follows: Socal Topock PGE/Mohave Topock Texaco 40 135 Burlington 26 74 Aero 5 15 Borax 7 12 LADWP 0 36 SWGas 0 20 5) Socal Topock would now be divided as follows: Expansion Shippers 78000 Socal Gas 425000 BLK 3 348000 (25-Amoco;20-Oneok;99-Williams;189 El Paso Merchant;15-Wlliams) Total 851000 540 divided by 841 would result in 37 percent cuts or 63 percent thruput. The producers were not happy with having to live with 37 percent cuts and felt that any transport sold after their Sept 28 complaint should be cut off the top which would be El Paso merchant services Blk 3. Separate meetings were then held amongst the Topock shippers to duscuss El Paso's counter -proposal.

What is the subject?

OUT: El Paso Complaint
QUESTION: Hi Carolyn, I can't recall whether Delta et al have seen a draft of the escrow agreement (and instructions) yet? Is this one in the works? I suspect GE may want to see it in connection with the giving of their consent. Thanks,
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: Escrow agreement
Jeff, don't forget that Mike is taking 27835 of the FOM gas into his pool everyday. With the Maumee cuts, I am showing that you are buying gas daily from ENA everyday. Column T under the CGAS tab shows what Gas Daily volumes you are taking from me. Column V shows the Gas Daily sells you are making to me. Column F is the citygate storage number that should match cell Q41 on your COH sheet. We have one big discrepancy on the 8th. Call me if you have questions. Joann, on the 8th, Jeff is showing a withdrawal of 57431(citygate number) we are showing a volume of 49560 (48478 at the citygate). Would you check that please.
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: Gas Daily's for January
Wipe Out Tax Debt, End your IRS tax problems! Would you like to resolve IRS and State tax problems quickly and easily? Would you like to save yourself a lot of money? Read on! Our nationally recognized tax attorneys, paralegals, legal assistants and licensed enrolled agents can help you no matter where you live in the US. By directly negotiating with the IRS and State authorities we can settle your debts for far less than what you currently owe! For a FREE analysis and more information on this subject, please fill out the short form below and e-mail it back to us. In the debt size field please also include any penalties or interest that you owe. Full Name : State : Phone Number : Time to Call : Estimated Tax Debt Size : Thank you for your time!
Answer: Wipe Out Tax Debt [5jfsk]
Q: I just spoke to Dave Fuller in the Portland Office about a potential 10 year deal he wants to do as soon as possible with the referenced entity. As we all know, because of the legal issues that arose out of the "Orange County" litigation, no financial trades should be entered into with any governmental entity before legal due diligence of the counterparty has been completed and an ISDA Master is in place. Also, besides the usual issues surround the governmental's authority to enter into derivative transactions, we also need to determine whether this entity can enter into transactions as long as 10 year w/o prior voter approval. Credit, if you will send the credit worksheet directly to me I will prepare a draft ASAP and Sara will review it. Dave should be calling you with the information. Christian, if you have done any due diligence already on this counterparty we would appreciate any assistance/documents you can provide. Thank you all for your assistance with this.
Propose a subject line
A:
Public Utility District of Clarke County, Washington