In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

[EX Q]: Comment: This was the longest hockey column on this site for eons. It got hard to read 'bout halfway thru, the tears from this columnist's eyes dripping onto the page were smearing the words....

Of all the teams in the playoffs, Cal was the only 1 that had a losing record in reg, meaning they relied on extra time, loser pts, to get in. They were pretenders all the way.

Their goal diff was barely to the good, barely, another stat that told us quite a bit.

And, Ana was an awful draw for them. So, add it all up, and you get Ana winning a short series, which is what happened.

They played in a 14-team conference, in which 4 of the teams were god-awful, meaning they only had to be better than 2 of their 9 opponents. There were better teams in the East that did not make the playoffs than Cal.

Let's move on.
[EX A]: Non-identity-attack

[EX Q]: Comment: Can someone please tell me on what basis analysts keep saying that the secret ballot will fail to remove Zuma? ANC MPs are well aware that Zuma is using State Intelligence to spy on them, so they'd be too paranoid to tell anyone if they intend to vote against Zuma.

It is the ANC's interest to remove Zuma. Opposition parties are getting political mileage everyday Zuma remains in power and everytime the ANC caucus fails to vote against him the votes of no confidence. There best chance of retaining power in 2019 is to remove Zuma now, as this will effectively end Dlamini Zuma's campaign, they can unite around Rhamaposa and focus on the ANC 2019 campaign. Do analsyts not see this, or do they really believe that ANC MPs are too politically naive not to see this?

No one of significance in the ANC is going to openly admit that Zuma might lose this vote, or that voting Zuma out is in the best interest of the ANC. They're politicians, not idiots. Analsysts need to read between the lines!
[EX A]: Non-identity-attack

[EX Q]: Comment: The article states that the pastor "voiced support for business owners who choose not to serve gay and lesbian clients".

It is curious that the article does not provide a quote of what the pastor actually said about businesses and homosexuality.

Here is a quote from another news source, the pastor's words:

"Have you ever asked yourself: How can we fight the tide of moral decay that is being crammed down our throats by Big Business, the media, and the gay & lesbian community? Tiffany's started advertising wedding rings for gay couples. Wells Fargo bank is using a same-sex couple in their advertising. But it has dawned on me that we don't have to do business with them. (And I am taking that action,) at the Billy Graham Evangelistic Association, we are moving our accounts from Wells Fargo to another bank."

Uh, hello?

Where did the pastor say that banks and jewelry stores should not let gay people in the door and should refuse to do business with gay people?
[EX A]:
Identity-attack