In this task, you're given a review from Amazon. Your task is to generate a rating for the product on a scale of 1-5 based on the review. The rating means 1: extremely poor, 2: poor, 3: neutral, 4: good, 5: extremely good.
Example: These are junk! Both bulbs have burned out within a two month period!! I cannot believe that this company can be in business with such poor quality. I have used infrared lights for my ball python for many years now and I get a varied range of months from a bulb, but I have never gone through two bulbs in a matter of two months! I am very disappointed.
Example solution: 1
Example explanation: The user seems very disappointed in the product. Because the bulb they ordered has been burned out earlier than usual. So, he gave 1 star to the review considering it extremely poor

Problem: That sort of thing needs to be in the description, or clearly readable in the photos, or at the very least, in a downloadable MSDS sheet. But none of those things are available for this item. People (such as myself) looking to restore/improve their cast iron cookware have no way of knowing in advance it's not safe to use this on things that make direct contact with food. I might keep it for some future cleaning need, but I can't use this for cleaning the crud off of a cast iron skillet that is intended to be used for cooking. It might be great for cleaning things that you don't cook food in, but i have nothing like that to use it for right now, so I can't evaluate it for that purpose. The way that vital safety information like is presented (or isn't presented in this case) to the consumer before purchase is definitely part of what makes up a product, and is a valid point for judging a product's quality.
Solution: 3