Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.

Q: Fair enough - I'm not a doc (at least not that kind), and I'm not arguing that physicians aren't highly trained. I also don't completely agree with your analysis, some of your figures, and some of your conclusions (it's OK, on many points I do agree with you). With that... if you will just hand me that erlenmeyer and step away from the homogenizer, I'll go back to my molecules, mice, and math.

A: Yes
****
Q: And 10 years, in a Federal Prison.
A. Subsistance Hunting. In 1987 the International Whaling Commission (IWC) set a quota of 3...but only one was killed in 1987...since the men are now aged or dead.
http://www.fws.gov/ecos/ajax/docs/recovery_plan/whale_humpback.pdf

A: No
****
Q: Wow Neil.... I use my firearms all the time, along with most of my gun toting friends and relatives. You must be lobbying for the groceries I plan on harvesting. I hope you are a vegan because every piece of meat you eat was killed. My dinner is at least wild and free before I humanely as possible kill it. I was taught that whatever I aim at I better kill; whatever I kill, I must eat it. Killing an animal is no sport, it is a sad affair. When you take my guns; you take my ability to feed my family. Eating is not a crime...yet!
Just so you know, it is illegal to have a felony record and a gun.

Oh drats...I am so off topic from the article! Sorry everyone I was thinking about the comments rather than the article.

I hope this person receives a fair trial by jury and not by mob vote.

A:
No
****