A road is not spotless if it has piles of debris on it.
The question and answer are below.
Given the sentence "Road workers among piles of debris." can we conclude that "The road was spotless."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
no
Since the children are sitting in front of the model volcano they must be observing it.. So what could be the question?
Question followed by answer: Premise: "Four school aged children are sitting in front of a model volcano."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "Four children observe a model volcano." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
yes
If the boy is carrying a baton then he hasn't lost the baton.
The question and answer are below.
Can we conclude from "A boy is carrying a baton while running a relay race." that "A boy loses a baton while running in a relay race."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
no
Dogs pulling a sled in the snow does not necessarily imply that they are pulling s sled in a dog-sled competition.
The question and answer are below.
Given the sentence "Dogs pull a sled in the snow." can we conclude that "Dogs are pulling a sled in a dog-sled competition."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
it is not possible to tell
Someone who is getting splashed in the face will have a face that is wet.. So what could be the question?
Question followed by answer: Given the sentence "A young boy is gettnig splashed in the face by a blue water toy." can we conclude that "The boy's face is wet."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
yes
The boys cannot be working on their bicycles and skateboards at the same time.. So what could be the question?
Question followed by answer:
Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "A couple of boys are in a gym with partially assembled bicycles."
Hypothesis: "The boys are working on their skateboards."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
no