In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Example input: Comment: Damn! Another cloudy day, and it's all Obama's doing!
Example output: Obscene
Example explanation: This is obscenity because it hints on sexual content that is offensive to the public sense of decency.
Q: Comment: Mr. Moreno I agree with you 100% that boycotting whole states is a terrible idea. It's vastly unfair to lump the whole population of a state together, as if they all believed the same thing. And, ironically, it is just as unfair to call that dumb idea a liberal fantasy or to assign it as liberal thought. As you do that, you are doing the same thing, lumping people together, and assigning blame.

We in this country are divided enough without this common process, from both sides, of lumping people together and false labeling. Liberals, fascists, snowflakes, whiners, elitists, oh my. Please just attack the idea and you're right to attack it without assigning it to a little less than half of the country. Dividing ourselves into warring sides kills real discussion of real issues.
A:
Non-obscene