Problem: It was a complex language. Not written down but handed down. One might say it was peeled down. Can we infer the following? the language was peeled down

Answer: Yes

Problem: B: I did, too. A: I mean, it was just more for my money. B: Yeah. I didn't think it was too long at all. Can we infer the following? it was too long

Answer: No

Problem: B: That's true. A: So. B: Uh, the other argument is that the death penalty is a deterrent and I really don't, uh, agree with that. I don't think anyone who would commit uh, a crime that would get them the death penalty would stop at the moment and say, well, I was about to kill and dismember this person but, oh, if they catch me they're going to kill me so I better not do it. I just, don't think uh, that it works that way. A: Yeah. I don't think it's done. Can we infer the following? it's done

Answer: No

Problem: His attorneys claim he was framed by the FBI and New York police as part of a campaign to destroy the black liberation movement of the 1960s. Because the federal Freedom of Information Act wasn't law at that time, the FBI wasn't required to turn over information on its investigations when Mr. Ferguson appealed his conviction in the 1960s. But in federal court in Manhattan, Judge Patterson said the FBI records could show that Mr. Ferguson's arrest was the result of questionable legal practices. Can we infer the following? Mr. Ferguson's arrest was the result of questionable legal practices

Answer:
Yes