input: Please answer the following: On a scale of 1-5 (with 1 being least favorable and 5 being most favorable), how would you rate this review? "Got worse lately Would've given more stars if not for the item degradation. Not that the mechanics itself is bad but the way it's currently implemented is extremely unbalanced. And I don't like that the developer doesn't really listen to what users say."
++++++++++
output: 3

Please answer this: On a scale of 1-5 (with 1 being least favorable and 5 being most favorable), how would you rate this review? "Great port Nailed it. Only minor issue is scroll effects are not smooth on any of my Android devices (g3 xt1575 xt1095)"
++++++++
Answer: 4

Problem: On a scale of 1-5 (with 1 being least favorable and 5 being most favorable), how would you rate this review? "Ali mehar"

A: 5

Problem: Given the question: On a scale of 1-5 (with 1 being least favorable and 5 being most favorable), how would you rate this review? "Useless battery burner space burner and invades personal space"
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
The answer is:
1

input question: On a scale of 1-5 (with 1 being least favorable and 5 being most favorable), how would you rate this review? "Did not expect this kind of service from a company like"???
output answer: 1

input question: On a scale of 1-5 (with 1 being least favorable and 5 being most favorable), how would you rate this review? "Upgrade request Can you add an automatic method to study the cards from back to front? Right now everything is in sequence to be studied as front of the card displayed first and then the back could you add a function to switch those? This way we could study them backwards as well because right now there is no option for that we'd have to write them all out again."???
output answer:
3