In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.
--------
Question: Comment: Miller still hasn't accepted Trump won. It's like an itch he can't scratch. It's driving him insane..

Answer: Disagree

Question: Comment: You are completely wrong. Just because something is "legal" does not compel anyone or any particular institution to provide it. Faith based organizations provide important services to our society and they are to be commended for doing so. It simply does not follow that just because a faith based institution refuses to provide something that is contrary to that faith that in turn it should be forced out of business entirely and in the process punish those who receive the much needed other services provided by the institution. That would be perverse.

Answer: Disagree

Question: Comment: "The Globe and Mail has learned that wealthy Chinese businessman Zhang Bin who, with a partner, donated $1-million to the Pierre Elliott Trudeau Foundation and the University of Montreal Faculty of Law weeks after the fundraiser, also attended the event. Mr. Zhang is a political adviser to the Chinese government in Beijing and a senior apparatchik in the network of Chinese state promotional activities around the world."

***

And I thought the Government of Ontario under Kathleen Wynne set the standard for corrupt political behaviour in selling political influence for a price. Trudeau lowers the standard even further showing the federal government can be bought off by a foreign country.

Answer:
Agree