You will be given a review about a book, an item, a place or a movie. After that, a question is given that you should answer using a certain span of the review. Your answer should be from the review itself and should not contain extra words, and should not be a combination of different spans. If there's no direct answer to the question, answer with a part of the text that is the most relevant to the question. See the examples for clarification.

Ex Input:
review: I have to say I loved this film. Principally, because I empathised so much with Hawke's character that I spent at least the first hour of the film trying to make excuses for Washington's character's behaviour. Perhaps I am just slow or naive, but I genuinely could not decide whether Washington was good or evil or just human in this film until the last half hour or so, when it becomes very obvious. I was sitting there debating with myself; is that truly the only way to approach this? Is there no other? I study Criminology and as such, the film was fascinating. I make no pretence that it was a particularly deep or thought-provoking film, only that it did address issues that I am interested in.I fully admit that I am no expert on crime on the streets of L.A. and so I make no judgement about how realistic this film was, except to say that while probably overdramatised, the issues raised are extremely relevant and far more common that you might believe.
question: Is the film fascinating?

Ex Output:
I loved this film

Ex Input:
review: Couldn't have asked for a better place to stay while in SanFran. All of the staff were very helpful and ready to go the extra mile for the guests. The free breakfast was good to get the day started. The wine and cheese was a great way to meet some of the other guests and get ideas about places to check out in SanFran. And you cannot beat the location of this hotel.If you just want another huge hotel with no personality then this is the wrong place. But I would recommend this hotel to everyone I know.
question: Is the wine nice?

Ex Output:
The wine and cheese was a great way to meet some of the other guests and

Ex Input:
review: [BOTTOM LINE]Simple menu. Delicious chicken (of course). A great option for a quick and delicious lunch. Centrally located, too.[THE SPACE]We loved the space. It was cool and casual and the music was great. We went during an off time (lunch around 2pm), but there were still a lot of people there. I'd make reservations ahead of time if you're coming for dinner or any other busy time. The wait staff was fantastic, as well.[THE FOOD]The lunch menu is really simple, in a good way. You should be coming here for the chicken, anyway. If we were hungrier, we'd have opted for the $38 'Lucky Dice' special for two, which has the jackpot chicken, wings, hamburg, and soup/salad.We each got:1) THE JACKPOT CHICKEN (with crispy skin) - $15 for the lunch special, which includes jackpot chicken, rice, ginger-scallion sauce, and winter melon soup. Loved it! Reminded me of my childhood (with the soft chicken skin as well). The ginger scallion sauce was pungent and tasty. The crispy skin is a must get, and almost chip like. Also the rice was killer (had a hint of chicken fat in it. Yea.)2) ROAST CHICKEN RICE (with crispy skin) - Tastes like a mix between chicken and char siu. I liked the pickled green papaya that came with it. I'd go classic with the jackpot chicken, though. Next time I'd add a soy sauce egg, too! I know it's sometimes hard to justify getting Hainanese chicken for $15, but you get a hip restaurant and nice service with it. Would definitely come back.
question: How is the chicken?

Ex Output:
Delicious chicken