Once again I will admonish all members that if they are going to stretch the credibility of their argument on Bill C-4 by referring to other issues, which is certainly their privilege, it would be best to use some imagination and to be sure to continue to come to a touchstone and not to challenge the Chair by forcing the Chair to make a ruling.

Can we draw the following conclusion?
We should use some imagination like and to be sure to continue to come to a touchstone and not to challenge the Chair of the United States by forcing the Chair to make a ruling.

Options are:
- Yes.
- It's impossible to say.
- No.
It's impossible to say