IN: This is an email
Students and Faculty, Attached is a memo from Kay Henry Director of MBA for Executives. Please contact Kay at 713-348-4731 or henryk@rice.edu if you have any questions regarding this memo. Kathy

What is the subject?

OUT: Surveys of MBA Programs for Executives
QUESTION: Terry and Dee: I am resending the draft ISDA which was sent to Terry and Vijay on April 25, 2001. Please let me know if you have any questions. Regards.
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: ISDA w/Enron Corp.
Mike, How goes it? I was thinking about you guys this weekend. We were in town for the game (if you want to call it a game). We ended up staying at a friends place. I think that is the first time in quite a while we haven't seen you on this particular weekend. We are still plugging along. How about you? I thought I heard you were buying a new house. Is that right? Well, I just hadn't talked to you in a while and I saw you email address on a message from Sean. We are going up to KU for the Texas game again. I can't believe it has been 4 years since we were up there. Take care. DG
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: Hey
Transwestern's average deliveries to California were 908 MMBtu/d (83%), with San Juan lateral throughput at 867 MMBtu/d. Total East deliveries averaged 536 MMBtu/d. El Paso's average deliveries to California were 2103 MMBtu/d (72%): - PG&ETop, capacity of 1140 MMBtu/d, deliveries of 723 MMBtu/d (63%) - SoCalEhr, capacity 1250 MMBtu/d, deliveries of 945 MMBtu/d (76%) - SoCalTop, capacity 543 MMBtu/d, deliveries of 435 MMBtu/d (80%) Friday's posted Gas Daily prices: SoCal gas, large pkgs 2.955 (-.075) PG&E, large pkgs 2.855 (-.165) TW San Juan n/a TW Permian 2.78 (-.08) Enron Online bases: Dec-Mar Apr-Oct Perm-CA .14 (-.03) .28 (+.02) SJ - CA .26 (-.01) .49 (+.05) SJ-Waha .16 (+.02) .25 (+.03) Perm-Waha .04 (even) .05 (+.01)
Answer: California Capacity Report for Week of 10/29-11/2
Here is an email: Mark, The following are my responses to Phillip's changes in our letter agreement: 1. 1st Sentence of Second Paragraph - Strike of reference to Section 3.3 and reference to Appendix 1 - ENA's right to decrease confirmed volumes and Phillips' rights to release the gas are clearly set out in Section 3.3. The "Operations/Delivery Scheduling Procedures" only are the method by which this is effected. This change needs to be removed. 2. 1st Sentence of Second Paragraph - The remainder of the changes to the 1st Sentence except for the strike of Seller's Daily Deliverability are OK. Seller's Daily Deliverability needs to remain as this is the correct terminology under the Purchase Agreement. All we are doing here is effecting the provisions of the Purchase Agreement to which both parties have already agreed. 3. The added sentence at the end of the second paragraph - This needs to be stricken. The Medicine Bow System is not ENA's and we do not want to create a firm purchase deal with this letter. 4. 1st Sentence of Third Paragraph - The add from "that quantity of Gas..... to.......... (the "Released Gas"" should be removed. The term Released Gas is defined under the Purchase Agreement and doesn't need to be defined in this letter. I am OK with ENA "hereby" agreeing to waive any and all rights it has to under Section 3.3 to recall the Gas. However, the term rights ENA "may" have needs to be stricken. ENA's position is that we have the right to recall the gas as long as it hasn't been released longer than 120 days. If you wish to discuss these comments or would like me to discuss these with Phillips, I would be happy to do so.
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: Phillips Letter Revisions
QUESTION: We got a call from the NYMEX today, and they received another Access terminal that appears to be slated for Enron. My understanding is that we have the five terminals that I ordered. You do have your two in Portland, don't you? Please confirm that for me. Thanks!
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS:
NYMEX Access