QUESTION: Premise: "A man looks at a woman who is blindfolded and is carrying an umbrella."
Hypothesis: "A guy stares at a person whose sight is blocked and is standing in a pool of hot chocolate."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?

SOLUTION: Let's solve this gradually. A woman would not need an umbrella to keep from getting wet if she was already in a pool of liquid.
Answer is no.

QUESTION: Given the sentence "Two brown dogs walking through snow." can we conclude that "The dogs are playing in the snow."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

SOLUTION: Let's solve this gradually. Two brown dogs walking through snow doesn't imply them to be playing.
Answer is it is not possible to tell.

QUESTION: Premise: "A woman is reading a piece of paper aloud as a man stands behind her."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "The woman is reading from directions she had written." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

SOLUTION: Let's solve this gradually. Directions are only one of many things that may be written on a paper.
Answer is it is not possible to tell.

QUESTION: Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "Two people dressed in mostly black clothing walking on a sidewalk."
Hypothesis: "Two dogs walking inside."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell

SOLUTION:
Let's solve this gradually. A dogs are not a people and one cannot walk inside and on a sidewalk at the same time.
Answer is no.