Given a passage with a context and an answer, construct a question on the basis of the information present in the passage. Construct the question in such a way that (i) it is unambiguous, (ii) it is answerable from the passage, (iii) its answer is unique (iv) it answer uses text phrases from the passage. Avoid creating questions that (i) can't be answered correctly without actually understanding the passage and (ii) uses the same words or phrases given in the passage.

Input: Consider Input: Context: The present study is to investigate the pathological changes in rabbits with traumatic optic neuropathy (TON), as well as the effect of fasudil on the lesions.', 'A total of 144 New Zealand rabbits were successfully established as TON models. Twelve hours after surgery, the rabbits in control, dexamethasone, and fasudil groups were administrated with saline, dexamethasone, and fasudil via ear veins, respectively. Then, retinas of the rabbits were obtained at 72 h and on days 7, 14 and 21 after surgery. The pathological changes in retina and optic nerves were observed by hematoxylin and eosin staining and transmission electron microscopy. The expression levels of Rho-associated genes were measured using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction.', 'In control group, the axons were swelling, and mitochondria showed vacuolation after optic nerve crush. Mitochondria were swelled slightly in dexamethasone group. By contrast, nerves in fasudil group were repaired. Retinal ganglion cells in control group were reduced significantly due to optic nerve crush. The loss of retinal ganglion cells was alleviated in fasudil group. Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction showed that the expression of Rho-associated genes were down-regulated.
Answer: The present study demonstrates that fasudil inhibits the apoptosis of retinal ganglion cells and ameliorates damages of optic nerves in traumatic optic neuropathy.

Output: Does fasudil alleviate traumatic optic neuropathy by inhibiting Rho signaling pathway?

Input: Consider Input: Context: Women have poorer outcomes after vascular surgery as compared to men as shown by studies recently. Frailty is also an independent risk factor for postoperative morbidity and mortality. This study examines the interplay of gender and frailty on outcomes after infrainguinal vascular procedures.', 'The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was used to identify all patients who underwent infrainguinal vascular procedures from 2005-2012. Frailty was measured using a modified frailty index (mFI; derived from the Canadian Study of Health and Aging). Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed to investigate the association of preoperative frailty and gender, on postoperative outcomes.', 'Of 24,645 patients (92% open, 8% endovascular), there were 533 deaths (2.2%) and 6198 (25.1%) major complications within 30 d postoperatively. Women were more frail (mean mFI = 0.269) than men (mean mFI = 0.259; P < 0.001). Women and frail patients (mFI>0.25) were more likely to have a major morbidity (P < 0.001) or mortality (P < 0.001) with the highest risk in frail women. On multivariate logistic regression analysis, female gender and increasing mFI were independently significantly associated with mortality (P < 0.05) as well as major complications. The interaction of gender and frailty in multivariate analysis showed the highest adjusted 30-d mortality and morbidity in frail females at 2.8% and 30.1%, respectively and that was significantly higher (P < 0.001) than nonfrail males, nonfrail females and frail males.
Answer: Female gender and frailty are both associated with increased risk of complications and death following infrainguinal vascular procedures with the highest risk in frail females. Further studies are needed to explore the mechanisms of interaction of gender and frailty and its effect on long-term outcomes for peripheral vascular disease.

Output: Do gender and frailty predict poor outcomes in infrainguinal vascular surgery?

Input: Consider Input: Context: We study a resistive-heating blanket in a volunteer model of severe accidental hypothermia to evaluate differences in rates of rewarming, core temperature afterdrop, and body heat content and distribution during active and passive rewarming.', 'Eight volunteers participated in a crossover design on 2 days. The volunteers were anesthetized and cooled to 33 degrees C (91.4 degrees F); anesthesia was subsequently discontinued, and shivering was prevented with meperidine. On one randomly assigned day, the volunteers were rewarmed passively with reflective foil (passive insulation), whereas on the other they were covered with a carbon fiber-resistive heating blanket set to 42 degrees C (107.6 degrees F; active rewarming). Trunk and head temperature and heat content were calculated from core (tympanic membrane) temperature. Peripheral (arm and leg) tissue temperature and heat content were estimated by using fourth-order regressions and integration over volume from 30 tissue and skin temperatures.', 'Core heat content increased 73+/-14 kcal (mean+/-SD) during 3 hours of active warming, but only 31+/-24 kcal with passive insulation, a difference of 41+/-20 kcal (95% confidence interval [CI] 27 to 55 kcal; P <. 001). Peripheral tissue heat content increased linearly by 111+/-16 kcal during active warming but only by 38+/-31 kcal during passive warming, a difference of 74+/-34 kcal (95% CI 50 to 97; P <.001). Consequently, total body heat increased 183+/-22 kcal during active warming but only 68+/-54 kcal with passive insulation, a difference of 115+/-42 kcal (95% CI 86 to 144 kcal; P <.001). Core temperature increased from 32.9 degrees C+/-0.2 degrees C to 35.2 degrees C+/-0. 4 degrees C during 3 hours of active warming, a difference of 2.3 degrees C+/-0.4 degrees C. In contrast, core temperature with foil insulation only increased from 32.9 degrees C+/-0.2 degrees C to 33. 8 degrees C+/-0.5 degrees C, a difference of only 0.8 degrees C+/-0. 4 degrees C. The difference in the core temperature increase between the two treatments was thus 1.5 degrees C+/-0.4 degrees C (95% CI 1. 2 degrees C to 1.7 degrees C; P <.001 between treatments). Active warming was not associated with an afterdrop, whereas the afterdrop was 0.2 degrees C+/-0.2 degrees C and lasted a median of 45 minutes (interquartile range, 41 to 64 minutes) with passive insulation.
Answer: Resistive heating more than doubles the rewarming rate compared with that produced by reflective metal foil and does so without producing an afterdrop. It is therefore likely to be useful in the prehospital setting.
Output: Is resistive heating more effective than metallic-foil insulation in an experimental model of accidental hypothermia : A randomized controlled trial?