Question: Sentence A: They later rebuilt it to bolster their own prestige, only to burn it down once again in a fit of pique when the Meiji Restoration of imperial power abolished their shogunate in 1868.

Sentence B: They burned down their own building because they were not happy with the Meiji.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question: This is because social insurance taxes, like other taxes, are determined through the exercise of the power of the Government to compel payment.
Thanks to the Goverment, social insurance taxes can be eliminated.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Problem: Here is a premise:
'Your argument is...compelling.

Here is a hypothesis:
Your argument for why you smoke marijuana is very compelling.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Sentence 1: what was wise guy

Sentence 2: Was wise guy a television show?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question:
It is also the case that newspapers, magazines, radio, and television are so financially dependent on consumer advertising that they're unlikely to lead the charge against this problem.

Does it follow that "Television would cease to exist without consumer advertising."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
it is not possible to tell

Question:
Based on the premise "oh you must live in this area we're in Sherman", can we conclude that "We're in Fort Lauderdale right now, you don't live here, do you?"? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
no