We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty) into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[EX Q]: Sent1: And that killer has help, he has the people that support the death penalty and will give him more appeals, and if found guilty he'll get an easy way out with death, he won't have to suffer.
Sent2: If we have a death penalty statute on the books, a person is convicted under that statute, his ONE appeal fails...he should die.
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: There are no children being killed, and killing a child is murder in America.
Sent2: if a person kills another person it is murder, whether it is sanctioned by the state or not.
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: Death penalty should be allowed as it deters people from committing serious crimes such as murder.
Sent2: If these bleak prospects aren't enough to deter someone from committing a serious crime, what will ramping it up to the death penalty do?
[EX A]:
Not similar