In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.
--------
Question: Comment: Maybe the media should take their heads out of their butts and start looking for the truth instead of trying to smear the President.

Answer: Sexual-explicit

Question: Comment: See if you can debate rationally rather than launching ad hominem attacks.

Answer: Non-sexual-explicit

Question: Comment: I think Yakabuski's actual point is defined by the following statement: "Mr. Obama was not born, experientially speaking, an African-American. He became one." Obama was raised by a white mother in a predominantly non-black (although still quite diverse) community. Does this mean he couldn't understand or represent the black experience, as some American blacks argued to be the case? Skin colour or apparent race isn't the sole determinant of identity. Perhaps all multigenerational North Americans should take one of those DNA ancestry tests that are advertised on television.. Many of us are probably much more diverse than we might imagine. Genealogical research into my family's background has uncovered some surprising facts, including that we had a great grandmother who was of Portuguese descent. Does diversity diminish and discredit identity, or enhance it? I think those who argue that purity is equivalent to legitimacy will in the long run be on the losing side of this argument.

Answer:
Non-sexual-explicit