In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Q: Comment: Okay you don't want to own Morning Joe and his bimbo even though they clearly espouse your views on President Trump.
Where do you stand on the sexual practices of people like JFK, Bill Clinton, Algore, John Edwards or LBJ?
My point was simply that sexual morality does not have an ideological bias. Can you even agree to something so obvious as that?

A: Non-obscene
****
Q: Comment: Correct me if I am wrong, but following criticism in these comments, I no longer see the perp described as a "white man" in this story.

(However, he continues to be described as a"white man" in a related story here.)

Let me know whether I just missed the white descriptor on second reading.

A: Non-obscene
****
Q: Comment: Read what the constitution says regarding freedom of speech Zanele Lwane... and by the way, fuck you and your racist rhetoric.

A:
Obscene
****