Given a paragraph about movies and a set of conversational questions and answers about the paragraph, say whether the passage contains sufficient information to answer the follow-up question. Say Yes if it is answerable; otherwise, say No. The paragraph has the prefix 'CONTEXT:'. Each conversation question has a prefix 'Q:' followed by the answer prefix 'A:', and the follow-up question has a prefix 'FOLLOWUP_Q:'.

[EX Q]: CONTEXT: You're kind of focusing on the wrong end of the sentiment. It's not so much that they did what Freddie wanted, it's that they never stood up to him or offered any critiques. What Freddie's trying to concede here is that he did his best work when Brian, Roger, and John were giving their input. The Munich guys were either unable or unwilling to stand up to Freddie's creativity, and so his work wasn't as good. In short, Freddie found out he is not the perfect musical force he believed he was before he went to Munich, he recognizes that he needs the rest of the band, and he's explaining why he was wrong in abandoning Queen. <sep> Q: Why is it a problem for Freddie if the guys from Munich did what he wanted? A: You're kind of focusing on the wrong end of the sentiment. It's not so much that they did what Freddie wanted Q: Why is their pushback that it was done? A: it's that they never stood up to him or offered any critiques <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Why is that a problem if it got done?
[EX A]: Yes

[EX Q]: CONTEXT: It is not explained, but we can theorize. We don't know when he rented those books. He might have done so before buying his own (to ensure he indeed should buy them), or because the books weren't easy (or cheap) to purchase. Also remember that instead of renting books on a subject he is well versed in, he probably became well versed on the subject thanks to renting those books. Finally, despite those books in his apartment, IIRC we are never told what those books are about. They might have had nothing to do with the seven deadly sins (John Doe wanted to avoid having incriminating evidence on his home, perhaps?), and thus all of his knowledge came from renting the books in the library. The books in his house might have been educational on a ton of other subjects or philosophies. Also keep in mind, the Internet still wasn't a thing back then. And books such as the ones mentioned (on bondage, homicide, or by Italian Dominican friars) might have not been easily found in your regular old book store. Finally, you can also claim that he rented them to make the plot move along, as this was their main lead. <sep> Q: Why did John Doe need to check out books at a public library? A: It is not explained, but we can theorize Q: What is your theory? A: Internet still wasn't a thing back then Q: John Doe knew a lot about the Seven Deadly Sins already, didn't he? A: IIRC we are never told what those books are about. They might have had nothing to do with the seven deadly sins Q: What else can you tell me about the movie? A: John Doe wanted to avoid having incriminating evidence on his home, perhaps?), and thus all of his knowledge came from renting the books in the library <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: What was Doe's motivation for his acts?
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: CONTEXT: Oskar does not become a vampire in the book. It is Hakan who becomes a vampire in the book. Also in the book, it is disclosed that Eli is a boy who was castrated years ago when he was converted to a vampire. In the movie, neither Hakan becomes a vampire nor is Eli disclosed to be a boy. Oskar and Eli flee. And as atm mentions in the comment, Oskar will grow old just like Hakan. <sep> Q: What happened to Eli and Oskar in Let the right one in? A: neither Hakan becomes a vampire nor is Eli disclosed to be a boy. Oskar and Eli flee. And as atm mentions in the comment, Oskar will grow old just like Hakan <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Can you tell me anything else about this movie?
[EX A]:
Yes