In this task, you are given text for US Congressional and California state bills, your task is to generate a summary for this bill.

[EX Q]: SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ''Preservation of Antibiotics for
Medical Treatment Act of 2011''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

The Congress finds the following:
(1) In January 2001, a Federal interagency task force--
(A) released an action plan to address the
continuing decline in effectiveness of antibiotics
against common bacterial infections, referred to as
antibiotic resistance;
(B) determined that antibiotic resistance is a
growing menace to all people and poses a serious threat
to public health; and
(C) cautioned that if current trends continue,
treatments for common infections will become
increasingly limited and expensive, and, in some cases,
nonexistent.
(2) Antibiotic resistance, resulting in a reduced number of
effective antibiotics, may significantly impair the ability of
the United States to respond to terrorist attacks involving
bacterial infections or a large influx of hospitalized
patients.
(3)(A) Any overuse or misuse of antibiotics contributes to
the spread of antibiotic resistance, whether in human medicine
or in agriculture.
(B) Recognizing the public health threat caused by
antibiotic resistance, Congress took several steps to curb
antibiotic overuse in human medicine through amendments to the
Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 201 et seq.) made by
section 102 of the Public Health Threats and Emergencies Act
(Public Law 106-505, title I; 114 Stat. 2315), but has not yet
addressed antibiotic overuse in agriculture.
(4) In a March 2003 report, the National Academy of
Sciences stated that--
(A) a decrease in antimicrobial use in human
medicine alone will have little effect on the current
situation; and
(B) substantial efforts must be made to decrease
inappropriate overuse in animals and agriculture.
(5) In 2010, the FDA determined that--
(A) 13.1 million kilograms of antibacterial drugs
were sold for use on food animals in the United States
in 2009;
(B) 3.3 million kilograms of antibacterial drugs
were used for human health in 2009; and
(C) therefore, 80 percent of antibacterial drugs
disseminated in the United States in 2009 were sold for
use on food animals, rather than being used for human
health.
(6)(A) Large-scale, voluntary surveys by the Department of
Agriculture's Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service in
1999, 2001, and 2006 revealed that--
(i) 84 percent of grower-finisher swine farms, 83
percent of cattle feedlots, and 84 percent of sheep
farms administer antimicrobials in the feed or water
for health or growth promotion reasons; and
(ii) many of the antimicrobials identified are
identical or closely related to drugs used in human
medicine, including tetracyclines, macrolides,
Bacitracin, penicillins, and sulfonamides; and
(B) these drugs are used in people to treat serious
diseases such as pneumonia, scarlet fever, rheumatic fever,
venereal disease, skin infections, and even pandemics like
malaria and plague, as well as bioterrorism agents like
smallpox and anthrax.
(7) Many scientific studies confirm that the nontherapeutic
use of antibiotics in agricultural animals contributes to the
development of antibiotic-resistant bacterial infections in
people.
(8) The periodical entitled ''Clinical Infectious
Diseases'' published a report in June 2002, that--
(A) was based on a 2-year review by experts in
human and veterinary medicine, public health,
microbiology, biostatistics, and risk analysis, of more
than 500 scientific studies on the human health impacts
of antimicrobial use in agriculture; and
(B) recommended that antimicrobial agents should no
longer be used in agriculture in the absence of
disease, but should be limited to therapy for diseased
individual animals and prophylaxis when disease is
documented in a herd or flock.
(9) The United States Geological Survey reported in March
2002 that--
(A) antibiotics were present in 48 percent of the
streams tested nationwide; and
(B) almost half of the tested streams were
downstream from agricultural operations.
(10) An April 1999 study by the General Accounting Office
concluded that resistant strains of 3 microorganisms that cause
food-borne illness or disease in humans (Salmonella,
Campylobacter, and E. coli) are linked to the use of
antibiotics in animals.
(11) Epidemiological research has shown that resistant
Salmonella and Campylobacter infections are associated with
increased numbers of ill patients and bloodstream infections,
and increased death.
(12) In 2010, the peer-reviewed journal Molecular Cell
published a study demonstrating that low-dosage use of
antibiotics causes a dramatic increase in genetic mutation,
raising new concerns about the agricultural practice of using
low-dosage antibiotics in order to stimulate growth promotion
and routinely prevent disease in unhealthy conditions.
(13)(A) In January 2003, Consumer Reports published test
results on poultry products bought in grocery stores nationwide
showing disturbingly high levels of Campylobacter and
Salmonella bacteria that were resistant to the antibiotics used
to treat food-borne illnesses.
(B) The Food and Drug Administration's National
Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring System routinely finds that
retail meat products are contaminated with bacteria (including
the foodborne pathogens Campylobacter and Salmonella) that are
resistant to antibiotics important in human medicine.
(C) In December 2007, the USDA issued a fact sheet on the
recently recognized link between antimicrobial drug use in
animals and Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureas (MRSA)
infections in humans.
(14) In October 2001, the New England Journal of Medicine
published an editorial urging a ban on nontherapeutic use of
medically important antibiotics in animals.
(15)(A) In 1998, the National Academy of Sciences noted
that antibiotic-resistant bacteria generate a minimum of
$4,000,000,000 to $5,000,000,000 in costs to United States
society and individuals yearly.
(B) In 2009, Cook County Hospital and the Alliance for
Prudent Use of Antibiotics estimated that the total health care
cost of antibiotic resistant infections in the United States
was between $16,600,000,000 and $26,000,000,000 annually.
(16) The American Medical Association, the American Public
Health Association, the National Association of County and City
Health Officials, and the National Campaign for Sustainable
Agriculture are among the more than 300 organizations
representing health, consumer, agricultural, environmental,
humane, and other interests that have supported enactment of
legislation to phase out nontherapeutic use in farm animals of
medically important antibiotics.
(17) In 2010, the Danish Veterinary and Food Administration
testified that the Danish ban of the non-therapeutic use of
antibiotics in food animal production resulted in a marked
reduction in antimicrobial resistance in multiple bacterial
species, including Campylobacter and Enterococci.
(18) In 2009, the Congressional Research Service concluded
that restrictions overseas on the use of antimicrobial drugs in
the production of livestock could impact U.S. export markets
for livestock and poultry.
(19) The Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C.
301 et seq.)--
(A) requires that all drugs be shown to be safe
before the drugs are approved; and
(B) places the burden on manufacturers to account
for health consequences and prove safety.
(20)(A) The Food and Drug Administration recently modified
the drug approval process for antibiotics to recognize the
development of resistant bacteria as an important aspect of
safety, but most antibiotics currently used in animal
production systems for nontherapeutic purposes were approved
before the Food and Drug Administration began considering
resistance during the drug-approval process.
(B) The Food and Drug Administration has not established a
schedule for reviewing those existing approvals.
(21) Certain non-routine uses of antibiotics in animal
agriculture are legitimate to prevent animal disease.
(22) An April 2004 study by the General Accounting Office--
(A) concluded that Federal agencies do not collect
the critical data on antibiotic use in animals that
they need to support research on human health risks;
and
(B) recommends that the Department of Agriculture
and the Department of Health and Human Services develop
and implement a plan to collect data on antibiotic use
in animals.

SEC. 3. PURPOSE.

The purpose of this Act is to preserve the effectiveness of
medically important antibiotics used in the treatment of human and
animal diseases by reviewing the safety of certain antibiotics for
nontherapeutic purposes in food-producing animals.

SEC. 4. PROOF OF SAFETY OF CRITICAL ANTIMICROBIAL ANIMAL DRUGS.

(a) Definitions.--Section 201 of the Federal Food, Drug, and
Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 321) is amended by adding at the end the
following:
''(ss) Critical Antimicrobial Animal Drug.--The term 'critical
antimicrobial animal drug' means a drug that--
''(1) is intended for use in food-producing animals; and
''(2) is composed wholly or partly of--
''(A) any kind of penicillin, tetracycline,
macrolide, lincosamide, streptogramin, aminoglycoside,
or sulfonamide; or
''(B) any other drug or derivative of a drug that
is used in humans or intended for use in humans to
treat or prevent disease or infection caused by
microorganisms.
''(tt) Nontherapeutic Use.--The term 'nontherapeutic use', with
respect to a critical antimicrobial animal drug, means any use of the
drug as a feed or water additive for an animal in the absence of any
clinical sign of disease in the animal for growth promotion, feed
efficiency, weight gain, routine disease prevention, or other routine
purpose.''.
(b) Applications Pending or Submitted After Enactment.--Section
512(d)(1) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C.
360b(d)(1)) is amended--
(1) in the first sentence--
(A) in subparagraph (H), by striking ''or'' at the
end;
(B) in subparagraph (I), by inserting ''or'' at the
end; and
(C) by inserting after subparagraph (I) the
following:
''(J) with respect to a critical antimicrobial
animal drug or a drug of the same chemical class as a
critical antimicrobial animal drug, the applicant has
failed to demonstrate that there is a reasonable
certainty of no harm to human health due to the
development of antimicrobial resistance that is
attributable, in whole or in part, to the
nontherapeutic use of the drug; or''; and
(2) in the second sentence, by striking ''(A) through (I)''
and inserting ''(A) through (J)''.
(c) Phased Elimination of Nontherapeutic Use in Animals of Critical
Antimicrobial Animal Drugs Important for Human Health.--Section 512 of
the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 360b) is amended by
adding at the end the following:
''(q) Phased Elimination of Nontherapeutic Use in Animals of
Critical Antimicrobial Animal Drugs Important for Human Health.--
''(1) Applicability.--This subsection applies to the
nontherapeutic use in a food-producing animal of a drug--
''(A)(i) that is a critical antimicrobial animal
drug; or
''(ii) that is of the same chemical class as a
critical antimicrobial animal drug; and
''(B)(i) for which there is in effect an approval
of an application or an exemption under subsection (b),
(i), or (j) of section 505; or
''(ii) that is otherwise marketed for use.
''(2) Withdrawal.--The Secretary shall withdraw the
approval of a nontherapeutic use in food-producing animals
described in paragraph (1) on the date that is 2 years after
the date of enactment of this subsection unless--
''(A) before the date that is 2 years after the
date of the enactment of this subsection, the Secretary
makes a final written determination that the holder of
the approved application has demonstrated that there is
a reasonable certainty of no harm to human health due
to the development of antimicrobial resistance that is
attributable in whole or in part to the nontherapeutic
use of the drug; or
''(B) before the date specified in subparagraph
(A), the Secretary makes a final written determination
under this subsection, with respect to a risk analysis
of the drug conducted by the Secretary and other
relevant information, that there is a reasonable
certainty of no harm to human health due to the
development of antimicrobial resistance that is
attributable in whole or in part to the nontherapeutic
use of the drug.
''(3) Exemptions.--Except as provided in paragraph (5), if
the Secretary grants an exemption under section 505(i) for a
drug that is a critical antimicrobial animal drug, the
Secretary shall rescind each approval of a nontherapeutic use
in a food-producing animal of the critical antimicrobial animal
drug, or of a drug in the same chemical class as the critical
antimicrobial animal drug, as of the date that is 2 years after
the date on which the Secretary grants the exemption.
''(4) Approvals.--Except as provided in paragraph (5), if
an application for a drug that is a critical antimicrobial
animal drug is submitted to the Secretary under section 505(b),
the Secretary shall rescind each approval of a nontherapeutic
use in a food-producing animal of the critical antimicrobial
animal drug, or of a drug in the same chemical class as the
critical antimicrobial animal drug, as of the date that is 2
years after the date on which the application is submitted to
the Secretary.
''(5) Exception.--Paragraph (3) or (4), as the case may be,
shall not apply if--
''(A) before the date on which approval would be
rescinded under that paragraph, the Secretary makes a
final written determination that the holder of the
application for the approved nontherapeutic use has
demonstrated that there is a reasonable certainty of no
harm to human health due to the development of
antimicrobial resistance that is attributable in whole
or in part to the nontherapeutic use in the food-
producing animal of the critical antimicrobial animal
drug; or
''(B) before the date specified in subparagraph
(A), the Secretary makes a final written determination
under this subsection, with respect to a risk analysis
of the critical antimicrobial animal drug conducted by
the Secretary and any other relevant information, that
there is a reasonable certainty of no harm to human
health due to the development of antimicrobial
resistance that is attributable in whole or in part to
the nontherapeutic use of the drug.''.

SEC. 5. COMMITTEE HEARINGS ON IMPLEMENTATION.

(a) In General.--The Committee on Energy and Commerce of the House
of Representatives and the Committee on Energy of the Senate shall each
hold a hearing on the implementation by the Commissioner of Food and
Drugs of section 512(q) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, as
added by section 4 of this Act.
(b) Exercise of Rulemaking Authority.--Subsection (a) is enacted--
(1) as an exercise of the rulemaking power of the House of
Representatives and Senate, and, as such, they shall be
considered as part of the rules of the House or Senate (as the
case may be), and such rules shall supersede any other rule of
the House or Senate only to the extent that rule is
inconsistent therewith; and
(2) with full recognition of the constitutional right of
either House to change such rules (so far as relating to the
procedure in such House) at any time, in the same manner, and
to the same extent as in the case of any other rule of the
House or Senate.
[EX A]: Preservation of Antibiotics for Medical Treatment Act of 2011 - Amends the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to require the Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS) to deny an application for a new animal drug that is a critical antimicrobial animal drug unless the applicant demonstrates that there is a reasonably certainty of no harm to human health due to the development of antimicrobial resistance attributable to the nontherapeutic use of the drug. Defines "critical antimicrobial animal drug" as a drug intended for use in food-producing animals that contains specified antibiotics or other drugs used in humans to treat or prevent disease or infection caused by microorganisms.

Requires the Secretary to withdraw approval of a nontherapeutic use of such drugs in food-producing animals two years after the date of enactment of this Act unless certain safety requirements are met. Directs specified congressional committees to hold hearings on the implementation of such a withdrawal of approval.

[EX Q]: SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ''Mandatory Foreclosure Mediation
Act''.

SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS.

In this Act, the following definitions shall apply:
(1) Alternative to foreclosure.--The term ''alternative to
foreclosure''--
(A) means a course of action with respect to a
mortgage offered by a servicer to a borrower as an
alternative to a covered foreclosure action; and
(B) includes a short sale and a deed in lieu of
foreclosure.
(2) Borrower.--The term ''borrower'' means a mortgagor
under a mortgage who is in default or at risk of imminent
default, as determined by the Secretary through regulations.
(3) Foreclosure action.--The term ''foreclosure action''
means a judicial or nonjudicial foreclosure.
(4) Loan modification program.--The term ''loan
modification program'' means a program or procedure designed to
change the terms of a mortgage in the case of the default,
delinquency, or imminent default or delinquency of a mortgagor,
including a loan modification program established by a servicer
that reduces the principal owed by the mortgagor on the
mortgage.
(5) Mortgage.--The term ''mortgage'' means a federally
related mortgage loan, as defined in section 3(1) of the Real
Estate Settlement Procedures Act of 1974 (12 U.S.C. 2602(1)),
that is secured by a first or subordinate lien on residential
real property.
(6) Secretary.--The term ''Secretary'' means the Secretary
of Housing and Urban Development.
(7) Servicer.--The term ''servicer''--
(A) has the same meaning as in section 6(i) of the
Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act of 1974 (12
U.S.C. 2605(i)); and
(B) includes a person responsible for servicing a
pool of mortgages.

SEC. 3. MEDIATION REQUIRED BEFORE FORECLOSURE.

(a) Initiation of Foreclosure Actions.--A servicer may not initiate
a foreclosure action against a borrower unless the servicer has--
(1) made a reasonable effort to initiate mediation
proceedings in accordance with the process established in
regulations prescribed pursuant to subsection (c) to determine
whether the borrower is eligible for a loan modification or an
alternative to foreclosure; and
(2) offered the borrower a loan modification or an
alternative to foreclosure, if the borrower is eligible for the
loan modification or alternative to foreclosure.
(b) Suspension of Foreclosure Actions.--
(1) In general.--A servicer shall suspend a foreclosure
action that was initiated before the date of enactment of this
Act until the servicer--
(A) completes a mediation proceeding in accordance
with the process established in regulations prescribed
pursuant to subsection (c) to determine whether the
borrower is eligible for a loan modification or an
alternative to foreclosure; and
(B) offers the borrower a loan modification or an
alternative to foreclosure, if the borrower is eligible
for a loan modification or an alternative to
foreclosure.
(2) Suspension.--During the period of the suspension under
paragraph (1), a servicer may not--
(A) send a notice of foreclosure to a borrower;
(B) conduct or schedule a sale of the real property
securing the mortgage of the borrower; or
(C) cause final judgment to be entered against the
borrower.
(3) Reasonable efforts.--A servicer is not required to
suspend a foreclosure action under paragraph (1) if the
servicer--
(A) makes a reasonable effort to schedule a
mediation proceeding to determine whether the borrower
is eligible for a loan modification or an alternative
to foreclosure; and
(B) documents that the borrower has not agreed to a
mediation proceeding to determine whether the borrower
is eligible for a loan modification or an alternative
to foreclosure.
(4) Rule of construction.--Nothing in this section may be
construed to require a servicer to delay an unavoidable
foreclosure, such as foreclosure that results from a borrower
abandoning the residential real property securing a mortgage.
(c) Establishment of Mediation Process.--The Secretary shall
establish through regulations a mediation process to determine whether
the borrower is eligible for a loan modification or an alternative to
foreclosure under this section.

SEC. 4. BAR TO FORECLOSURE ACTIONS.

(a) In General.--Subject to subsection (b), a violation of this Act
shall be a bar to a foreclosure action.
(b) Effect of Subsequent Compliance.--If a servicer is in
compliance with this Act, the servicer may bring or proceed with a
foreclosure action, without regard to a prior violation of this Act by
the servicer.

SEC. 5. REGULATIONS.

Not later than 90 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the
Secretary shall issue regulations to carry out this Act.

SEC. 6. REPORT.

Each servicer that initiates mediation proceedings under section 3
shall submit to the Secretary a quarterly report at such time, in such
manner, and containing such information, with respect to such
proceedings, as the Secretary may require.
[EX A]: Mandatory Foreclosure Mediation Act - Prohibits a servicer from initiating a foreclosure action against a borrower unless the servicer has: (1) made a reasonable effort to initiate mediation proceedings to determine if the borrower is eligible for a loan modification or an alternative to foreclosure; and (2) offered the borrower, if eligible, such a modification or alternative.

Requires a servicer to suspend a foreclosure action initiated before the enactment of this Act until the servicer: (1) completes such a mediation proceeding; and (2) offers the borrower, if eligible, a modification or alternative.

Prohibits a servicer, during the suspension period, from: (1) sending the borrower a notice of foreclosure, (2) conducting or scheduling a sale of the real property securing the mortgage, or (3) causing final judgment to be entered against the borrower.

Directs the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) to establish such a mediation process.

Declares that a servicer is not required to suspend a foreclosure action if the servicer makes a reasonable effort to schedule a mediation proceeding and documents that the borrower has not agreed to one.

Makes a violation of this Act a bar to a foreclosure action. Allows a servicer in compliance with this Act, however, to bring or proceed with a foreclosure action, regardless of any prior violation.

[EX Q]: SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ''Safe Academic Facilities and
Environments for Tribal Youth Act'' or the ''SAFETY Act''.

SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS.

In this Act:
(1) Department.--The term ''Department'' means the
Department of the Interior.
(2) Indian.--The term ''Indian'' means a member of an
Indian tribe.
(3) Indian tribe.--The term ''Indian tribe'' has the
meaning given the term in section 4 of the Indian Self-
Determination and Education Assistance Act (25 U.S.C. 450b).
(4) Secretary.--The term ''Secretary'' means the Secretary
of the Interior.

SEC. 3. TRIBAL SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION DEMONSTRATION PROGRAM.

(a) Definitions.--In this section:
(1) Construction of replacement tribal school.--The term
''construction of a replacement tribal school'' includes the
construction or renovation of--
(A) 1 or more facilities of that school; or
(B) the entire campus of that school.
(2) Demonstration program.--The term ''demonstration
program'' means the Tribal School Construction Demonstration
Program carried out under subsection (b).
(3) Eligible indian tribe.--The term ''eligible Indian
tribe'' means an Indian tribe that submits an application that
is approved by the Secretary under subsection (b)(4).
(4) Tribal school.--The term ''tribal school'' means--
(A) a school operated by the Bureau of Indian
Affairs;
(B) a school operated pursuant to the Indian Self-
Determination and Education Assistance Act (25 U.S.C.
450 et seq.); and
(C) a tribally controlled school (as defined in
section 5212 of the Tribally Controlled Schools Act of
1988 (25 U.S.C. 2511)).
(b) Demonstration Program.--
(1) In general.--The Secretary shall carry out a
demonstration program to be known as the ''Tribal School
Construction Demonstration Program'' for fiscal years 2017
through 2021, to provide grants to eligible Indian tribes for
the construction of replacement tribal schools.
(2) Purposes.--The purposes of the demonstration program
shall be--
(A) to provide additional Indian tribes fair
opportunities to construct replacement tribal schools;
(B) to accelerate construction of needed
educational facilities in Indian country; and
(C) to permit additional funds to be provided for
the priority list of the Department for construction of
replacement tribal schools.
(3) Grant recipients.--
(A) In general.--In carrying out the demonstration
program, subject to the availability of appropriations,
the Secretary shall award a grant to each eligible
Indian tribe.
(B) Priority.--The Secretary shall ensure that an
eligible Indian tribe currently on the priority list of
the Department for construction of replacement tribal
schools receives the highest priority for a grant under
this section.
(4) Grant applications.--An application for a grant under
the section shall--
(A) include a proposal for the construction of a
replacement tribal school of the Indian tribe that
submits the application; and
(B) be in such form as the Secretary determines
appropriate.
(5) Grant agreement.--As a condition of receiving a grant
under this section, the eligible Indian tribe shall enter into
an agreement with the Secretary that specifies--
(A) the costs of construction under the grant;
(B) that the Indian tribe shall be required to
contribute towards the cost of the construction a
tribal share equal to at least 25 percent of the cost;
and
(C) any other term or condition that the Secretary
determines to be appropriate.
(c) Effect of Grant.--A grant received under this section--
(1) shall be in addition to any other funds received by an
Indian tribe under any other provision of law; and
(2) shall not affect the eligibility of an Indian tribe
receiving funding, or the amount of funding received by the
Indian tribe, under--
(A) the Tribally Controlled Schools Act of 1988 (25
U.S.C. 2501 et seq.); or
(B) the Indian Self-Determination and Education
Assistance Act (25 U.S.C. 450 et seq.).
(d) Report.--At the conclusion of the demonstration program, the
Secretary shall submit to Congress a report on whether the
demonstration program has achieved the purposes of the demonstration
program, as described in subsection (b)(2).

SEC. 4. FUNDING FOR TRIBAL COLLEGES CONSTRUCTION.

Section 113 of the Tribally Controlled Colleges and Universities
Assistance Act of 1978 (25 U.S.C. 1813) is amended to read as follows:

''SEC. 113. CONSTRUCTION OF NEW FACILITIES.

''(a) Definitions.--In this section:
''(1) Construction.--The term 'construction' includes any
effort to address the facility construction, maintenance,
renovation, reconstruction, and replacement needs of a Tribal
College or University.
''(2) Tribal college or university.--The term 'Tribal
College or University' has the meaning given the term in
section 316(b) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C.
1059c(b)).
''(b) Grants.--With respect to any eligible Tribal College or
University that identifies a need for construction, the Secretary
shall, subject to the availability of appropriations, provide grants
for the construction in accordance with this section.
''(c) Application.--Each eligible applicant desiring a grant under
this section shall submit an application to the Secretary at such time,
in such manner, and containing such information as the Secretary may
require.
''(d) Eligible Activities.--Activities eligible for a grant under
this section shall be activities that address a wide variety of
facilities and infrastructure needs, including--
''(1) building of new facilities, including--
''(A) classrooms;
''(B) administrative offices;
''(C) libraries;
''(D) health and cultural centers;
''(E) day care centers;
''(F) technology centers; and
''(G) other education-related facilities;
''(2) renovating or expanding existing or acquired
facilities;
''(3) providing existing facilities with equipment,
including--
''(A) laboratory equipment;
''(B) computer infrastructure and equipment;
''(C) library books; and
''(D) furniture; and
''(4) property acquisition.
''(e) No Matching Requirement.--A recipient of a grant under this
section shall not be required to make a matching contribution for
Federal amounts received.
''(f) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be
appropriated to carry out this section $5,000,000 for each of fiscal
years 2017 through 2021.''.

SEC. 5. HOUSING ASSISTANCE FOR EDUCATORS IN SCHOOLS WITH INDIAN
STUDENTS.

Title V of the Housing Act of 1949 (42 U.S.C. 1471 et seq.) is
amended by adding at the end the following:

''SEC. 545. HOUSING ASSISTANCE FOR EDUCATORS IN SCHOOLS WITH INDIAN
STUDENTS.

''(a) Definitions.--In this section--
''(1) the term 'covered educator' means an individual who
is employed full-time as a teacher, principal, administrator,
or other licensed professional educator by a covered school;
''(2) the term 'covered school' means--
''(A) a school operated by the Bureau of Indian
Affairs;
''(B) a school operated pursuant to the Indian
Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act (25
U.S.C. 450 et seq.);
''(C) a tribally controlled school (as defined in
section 5212 of the Tribally Controlled Schools Act of
1988 (25 U.S.C. 2511)); and
''(D) a public elementary school or secondary
school in which not less than 25 percent of the
students are Indian students;
''(3) the terms 'elementary school' and 'secondary school'
have the meanings given those terms in section 8101 of the
Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965; and
''(4) the term 'eligible applicant' means--
''(A) an Indian tribe (as defined in section 4 of
the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance
Act (25 U.S.C. 450b));
''(B) an Indian organization (as defined in section
1141 of the Education Amendments of 1978 (25 U.S.C.
2021)); or
''(C) a tribally designated housing entity (as
defined in section 4 of the Native American Housing
Assistance and Self-Determination Act of 1996 (25
U.S.C. 4103)).
''(b) Grant Program.--The Secretary may award grants to eligible
applicants to construct, including by reconstructing, renovating, and
repairing, and provide housing to covered educators in rural areas.
''(c) Application.--Each eligible applicant desiring a grant under
this section shall submit an application to the Secretary at such time,
in such manner, and containing such information as the Secretary may
require.
''(d) Non-Federal Share.--A recipient of a grant under this section
shall not be required to obtain or provide a non-Federal share in order
to receive assistance under this section.
''(e) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be
appropriated to the Secretary to carry out this section $5,000,000 for
fiscal year 2017 and each fiscal year thereafter.''.

SEC. 6. BIE AND OMB PLAN.

(a) In General.--The Bureau of Indian Education and the Office of
Management and Budget shall jointly develop a 10-year plan to bring up
to good condition, as determined by the facilities evaluation process
of the Department of the Interior, in compliance with all applicable
tribal requirements all of the following Bureau of Indian Education
school facilities:
(1) An elementary or secondary day or boarding school
operated by the Bureau of Indian Education.
(2) A school operated pursuant to the Indian Self-
Determination and Education Assistance Act (25 U.S.C. 450 et
seq.).
(3) A tribally controlled school (as defined in section
5212 of the Tribally Controlled Schools Act of 1988 (25 U.S.C.
2511)).
(4) A dormitory operated by the Bureau of Indian Education
for students attending a school other than a school specified
in paragraphs (1) through (3).
(b) Inclusions.--The plan developed under subsection (a) shall
include--
(1) proposed budget requests and timelines; and
(2) additional factors such as increasing enrollment
capacities.
(c) Effect.--For the purpose of developing the plan under
subsection (a) only, section 1125(a)(5) of the Education Amendments of
1978 (25 U.S.C. 2005(a)(5)) shall not apply.
(d) Report.--As soon as practicable after completion of the plan
developed under subsection (a), the Secretary shall submit a report
describing the plan to--
(1) the Subcommittee on Interior, Environment, and Related
Agencies of the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate;
(2) the Committee on Indian Affairs of the Senate;
(3) the Subcommittee on Interior, Environment, and Related
Agencies of the Committee on Appropriations of the House of
Representatives; and
(4) the Committee on Natural Resources of the House of
Representatives.

SEC. 7. GAO REPORT.

Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the
Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to Congress a
comprehensive report describing the implementation of section 8007 of
the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (as in effect on
December 9, 2015), for fiscal years preceding fiscal year 2017, and
section 7007 of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (as
in effect for fiscal year 2017), for fiscal year 2017 and subsequent
fiscal years, that--
(1) evaluates the adequacy of the distribution of payments
between subparagraphs (A) and (B) of subsection (a)(3) of those
sections;
(2) evaluates unmet need; and
(3) determines the age, condition, and remaining utility of
school facilities (as the term is defined in section 7013 of
that Act (as in effect for fiscal year 2017)) for those local
educational agencies enrolling students described in section
7003(a)(1)(C) of that Act (as so in effect) that are eligible
to receive a basic support payment under--
(A) section 8003(b) of that Act (as in effect on
December 9, 2015) for fiscal years preceding fiscal
year 2017; and
(B) section 7003(b) of that Act (as in effect for
fiscal year 2017) for fiscal year 2017 and subsequent
fiscal years.
[EX A]:
Safe Academic Facilities and Environments for Tribal Youth Act or the SAFETY Act This bill directs the Department of the Interior to carry out a Tribal School Construction Demonstration Program to award grants to Indian tribes for the construction of replacement tribal schools. The program provides additional funding and opportunities for tribes to construct schools. Tribes on the Interior priority list for construction of tribal schools receive the highest priority for a grant under this program. This bill amends the Tribally Controlled Colleges and Universities Assistance Act of 1978 to revise the grant program for construction at tribal colleges and universities. The bill eliminates the requirements for Interior to identify the need for construction and tribal colleges and universities to provide matching funds. Restrictions on grant amounts and the use of constructed facilities are removed. This bill amends the Housing Act of 1949 to authorize the Department of Agriculture to award grants to Indian tribes, tribal organizations, and tribal housing entities for the construction or renovation of housing in rural areas for educators at Indian schools and schools where at least 25% of the students are Indian. The Bureau of Indian Education and the Office of Management and Budget must develop a 10-year plan to bring up to good condition certain Bureau of Indian Education school facilities. The Government Accountability Office must report on Impact Aid for construction provided to local education agencies impacted by military dependent children and children who reside on Indian lands.