Talking on a phone is a different activity than smashing it. Yelling into a phone while it is being smashed is not really 'talking' on it.
The question and answer are below.
Premise: "Man with hard hat talking on phone."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "Man smashes his phone on the concrete floor." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
no
In order to have officers pulling over a BMW there must be someone driving a BMW.
The question and answer are below.
Premise: "You have two officers pulling over a bmw for getting a ticket from both officers."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "Officers are pulling over someone driving a bmw." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
yes
A horse and rider go together with the rider being on top of the horse.. So what could be the question?
Question followed by answer: If "A horse and rider jumping a small fence." does that mean that "A rider is on a horse."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
yes
Two men and a couple of guys are the same thing.
The question and answer are below.
Premise: "Two men on opposite teams playing basketball."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A couple of guys on opposing sides playing basketball." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
yes
You cannot be sleeping and standing as you must be awake to be standing.
The question and answer are below.
Premise: "A man is standing behind a giant green machine."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A guy is sleeping in his bed." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
no
In no way is that he is wearing a baseball cap implied by the fact that he is little or enjoying a blue lollipop.
The question and answer are below.
Premise: "A little boys is enjoying a blue lollipop."
Hypothesis: "The boy is wearing a baseball cap."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
it is not possible to tell