Problem: Honourable senators, as I stand here today, it is particularly painful to know that in spite of the shock, the revulsion, the widespread publicity and awareness that has flowed from this dreadful event, violence against women and children continues to grow in our country and around the world.

Based on the paragraph above can we conclude that "they are talking about fishs only"? OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No

A: No

Problem: Ratnasimha (IAST: Ratna-Simha, r. c. 1302-1303 CE) was a ruler of the Medapata (Mewar) kingdom in present-day Rajasthan, India. He belonged to the Rawal branch of the Guhila dynasty, which ruled from the Chitrakuta fort (modern Chittorgarh). The last ruler of this branch, he was defeated by Alauddin Khalji in 1303 CE.

Based on the paragraph above can we conclude that "Ratnasimha was defeated in 1303 CE"? OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No

A: Yes

Problem: Uniformity is not a sine qua non, and this is where Pepin-Robarts in reminding us of the opting in and opting out facilities and raising the compensation in opting out provided the opportunity if there is a spirit of goodwill and of pragmatic compromise for working out arrangements to accommodate the increasing pluralism in our federal society.

Based on the paragraph above can we conclude that "Conformity is not a sine qua non."? OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No

A:
Yes