In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.

Comment: Of Course you aren't frustrated because you don't care a wiff about honesty and integrity. You babble on constantly about issues that no longer apply. It's hard to be frustrated when you don't even understand the issues Captain. And you have shown that trend over and over again.

They say ignorance is bliss and you are it's poster child.
Non-threat

Comment: Oh for God's sake Trid, hang it up already!
Threat

Comment: Prior to the advent of comments being posted on news articles, the public had very few avenues for stating its point of view on a matter written up. I remember in the day that letters to the editor - if you could get yours printed - was like winning the lottery considering the high wall of critique a editorial editor would put on those letters, especially those with a different point of view. So, in looking forward, today's forums allow for many more to provide their input into a subject.

Now whether that opinion is good or not, I think any opinion put out on this is as valuable as the next opinion. Those who post way more than I should understand that.

But one thing is for sure, don't let forums like this get so regulated so that a faceless, nameless newspaper bureaucrat determines what should be said in comments, and what should not. That will definitely happen should comments here degenerate into personal attacks and Il Duce-type posturing on issues.
Non-threat