In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: Alceste, you are a woman's sexual organ

Output: Sexual-explicit

Input: Consider Input: Comment: Then stop grabbing me by my male genitals, if you hate that phrasing. When are liberals going to stop encouraging hate by pitting one group against another.
Anti-hate, proud, white, and unapologetic for all.

Output: Sexual-explicit

Input: Consider Input: Comment: Are you a one-dimensional zealot, or some sort of bot?

Either way, it's clear you don't know what life is like for ordinary folks who are more concerned with paying their bills, raising their kids, doing their jobs, figuring out what's for dinner, and rooting for the Seahawks. Most of us aren't obsessed with some extreme political agenda, or some single-issue war like water fluoridation, pro or con.

Or... is that the point of people like you -- trolls of all kinds? That's why the Russians bother to do it to our politics. You hope that most people are too busy to really read what you write -- that we'll just vaguely notice that there's a lot of comments in favor of fluoride, that they sound scientific and have lots of links, and not really pay attention to what's actually being said.

Still, it does seem excessive that you can't resist insulting us. You call Bob a "lost cause," e.g., because he points out that most other developed nations have stopped fluoridating? Tsk.
Output: Non-sexual-explicit