We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

[Q]: As I say this case does not fit the bill completely, but I'm sure similar cases must arise and they should be an exception.
[A]: Invalid

[Q]: But if that one doesn't wash for you, here's another argument against the deterent factor (and I must credit a bunch of wonderful schools debaters from a disadvantaged community in the third world for this):
[A]: Valid

[Q]: Of those reasons which you gave, which ones do you think cannot be accomodated by lesser senteces and NEED the death penalty?
[A]:
Valid