Question:
Based on the premise "As noted above, we apply one adjustment by discounting lagged mortality incidence effects.", can we conclude that "The adjustment is needed to analyze the data."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
it is not possible to tell

Question: Sentence A: It's much easier, but quite expensive, to take the cable car.

Sentence B: Most people choose to save the money and walk instead.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question: What did you see? asked Adrin.
Adrin asked, what did you see?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Problem: Here is a premise:
Dunnes Stores (ILAC Ceter and Nassau Street) sells Irish smoked salmon (ask for the wild, not farmed, variety).

Here is a hypothesis:
The farmed salmon lacks some of the flavor that wild salmon has.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Sentence 1: Interest on uninvested funds received by direct loan and guaranteed loan financing accounts.

Sentence 2: There is no interest on uninvested funds received by direct loan.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: no

Premise:
"We also make adjustments to account for expected changes in WTP over time as per capita income increases."
Hypothesis: As the per capita income increases, we change to account for predicted alterations in WTP as time goes on.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
yes