Categorize the comment on the basis of severe toxicity. If the comment is severely toxic output Yes, otherwise output No.

Ah, I don't know about the "far left" [am somewhat unsure what/who you're referring to] but my remark had little to do with "the more popular religions in the US", unless you consider religious sects that post large signs saying "If you worship the Earth, I spit on your Mother", publish comments such as: "Nuke them [Moslems] until they glow; then shoot them in the dark.", call for beheading infidels, or teach that nonbelievers should burn in hell, etc, etc, etc - as outstandingly popular in the US. And I really don't believe that ANYONE [not even most heinous of the "Far Left"] is asking that the straight population "conform" to trans-gender people either - is that even possible?? I don't think so.
Just saying - replying to comment means so much more, if you reply to the comment that posted.
Yes

Once again, Anchorage needs a homeless camp. Wet on one side dry on the other and a 15 foot chainlink fence down the middle. Clear them out every two months to bulldoze the trash and s**t to the dump. Then let them back in. If they want to drink to death let them. If they want help, then at least those who might be able to help will be able to find them.
Yes

This is borderline insane. What you are insinuating is that there needs to be free access to guns in all walks of life 'just in case'. Seriously? You WANT people who drink to have firearms? Because they might be helpful if bullets might start flying?
I can't for the life of me follow your logic. Bad people hurt other people. It's life. We try to reduce overall risk by reducing temptation and stupidity.
But you.....wow. It's nearly victim blaming because these people didn't defend themselves or associate in a peaceful environment correctly. Tell you what KK. If you think everyone should have a gun then have everyone at your next political rally show up with one and see what happens.
Yes