Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.

[EX Q]: The decision was made to ban smoking and drones in Eugene parks, yet it continues in spades at Amazon Park , Skinner Butte and especially Alton Baker. To boot, lawmakers want to give smoker's " a 3 month white glove treatment for 'education ' " That's infuriating for those of us who frequently exercise in our parks and routinely encounter/ breathe in second- hand smoke. This law is a huge joke, it will NEVER be enforced, and smokers will continue to have the unopposed the upper hand and run amuck, smoking to their heart's content.
[EX A]: Yes

[EX Q]: Kudos to Seth for telling the kids to turn off the tv. Television is destroying America. Everybody should turn it off.
[EX A]: Yes

[EX Q]: Well, look at the bright side. At least he hasn't introduced another bill keeping comprehensive sex education out of schools, women from making choices over their own bodies, or transgenders from using pubwic westwooms like some a doze cwazy chwist'n wepubwicans doo. However, they DO have their problem priorities, don't they? Johnson's seems to be that poor people exist.
[EX A]:
No