Q: RBowers@nyiso.com writes to the NYISO_TECH_EXCHANGE Discussion List: The NYISO will be posting invoices later today for the initial settlements of July 2001 and the 1st settlement adjustments of July 2000, August 2000, & March 2001. Transmission Customers will observe the following adjustments to their settlements. Adjustments have been made to Transmission Customers' invoices to recover the costs related adjustments made to customer settlements outside of the billing process and to adjust the NYISO clearing account balance to zero for each month invoiced. Prior to October 2000, the NYISO recovered or refunded differences in the revenue received from Schedule 1 charges, which were comprised of forecasted uplift & residual adjustments, and the costs actually incurred by adjusting subsequent month's Schedule 1 rates accordingly. In October 2000, the NYISO implemented a change in the tariffed Schedule 1 provisions that allowed the recovery and refund of these costs as they were incurred. In order to allow any changes in uplift and residual adjustments to be settled through the settlement adjustment process, the code implemented in October 2000 was used to report these costs to the market. This results in an over-collection which is being returned to Customers through an adjustment to their monthly balances. This billing treatment for July 2000 and August 2000 settlement adjustments resulted in credits to the market totaling $7,700,605.23 and $32,146,310.55, respectively. Customers where paid their share of these adjustments based upon their respective ratio shares of NYISO load for each month. This adjustment provides for the settlement of all accounts in the market in the month(s) the costs or over-collections were realized and adjusts the NYISO clearing account balance impact to zero for each month. Adjustments have also been made to Transmission Customers' invoices to recover the costs related adjustments made to customer settlements outside of the billing process. These adjustments totalled $964,548.42 for March 2001, $375,110.49 for July 2000 and $48,973.41 for August 2000. Customers where allocated their share in these costs based upon their respective ratio shares of NYISO load for each month. Regards,
Propose a subject line
A: Adjustments to 7/2000, 8/2000, & 3/2001 Settlement Adjustment Invoices
IN: I told the online people I had to shut them down for power because we didn't have them on any FERC lists. Below is their ph. # (when you get a minute! ).

Generate a subject line.

OUT: Port of Seattle
IN: This is an email
We have just decided to divide the western region into two groups. I will be heading up the Rockies/NW and Northern California, while Phillip Allen heads up the Southwest and Southern California. Think about whether or not you would like to change how you serve our groups going forward. We will need to divide the curve files to reflect the separate regions. The Southwest will be defined as EP SJ and EP Permian. P&L summary reports will be separated into two groups. Grigsby Jason Wolfe Frank Ermis Steve South Jay Reitmeyer Allen Jane Tholt Matt Lenhart Matt Smith Keith Holst Thanks

What is the subject?

OUT: West
QUESTION: Clinton greater than 6 month deals: Contract # 960385052 Deal # 246926 Term: 11/01/00 - 10/31/01 Delivery Point: Columbia Gas Trans- Appalachia pool. Firm ENA sale to Clinton. 15,000 MMBtu/day . Contract # 960385053 Deal # 246931 Term: 11/01/00 - 10/31/01 Delivery Point: Columbia Gas Trans- Appalachia pool. Firm ENA purchase from Clinton. 15,000 MMBtu/day .
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: Clinton Energy Management Services, Inc.
Dear Joannie: Dan Hutton just contacted me and mentioned you'd be willing to forward this letter to the appropriate IT development group(s) within Enron. While we offer incredible programming services, we have had some difficulty in reaching the appropriate parties within Enron. Thank you very much for your assistance. If you have any questions about our services, please contact me at (512)917-6509. Kind regards,
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: Enron IT Development Group
David, Please change the date on the draft so that we won't confuse it with the prior drafts. I would delete "specifically" from 2.10 (c), and add "or later ratify such transaction" (or something to that effect), just in case they later learn and accept the transaction. In 2.10 (x), add to "due to an inability to pay, or other credit reason". In (y), add "or a contractual defense to payment" [could be force majeure, etc] Again in 2.10, third sentence from the end "any interest, penalties, attorneys fees and court costspayable by the Hub Shipper...; 3.3 Delete "prior" before "approval", and add "or ratification" in the redlined section on refunds. Thanks,
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer:
Hub agency/my comments