Problem: Here is a premise:
Shepherd, of course.

Here is a hypothesis:
For sure, Shepherd.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Sentence 1: because the water was so awful and

Sentence 2: The water was awful.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: yes

Question:
However, it did provide estimates of some of the costs that might be incurred if the rule were not implemented and an outbreak of BSE were to occur in the United States.

Does it follow that "It said that the probability of a BSE outbreak in the United States was very low."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
it is not possible to tell

Q: If So poisons 'naturally interest' you, do they? , can we say that "So you have an interest in poisons?"?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A: yes

Premise:
"Waugh's 1930s novels, such as Vile Bodies and Black Mischief , are wicked fun in the strict sense."
Hypothesis: Waugh is a great author.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

it is not possible to tell

Sentence 1: Accidentally, it is believed.

Sentence 2: Not on purpose, they all believe.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer:
it is not possible to tell