Read the given text and if it has abusive content then indicate via "yes". Otherwise indicate via"no".
We consider the content to be abusive if it contains any of the following instances: (1) Identity Directed Abuse (e.g., Content which contains a negative statement made against an identity. An identity is a social category that relates to a fundamental aspect of individuals community, socio-demographics, position or self-representation) (2) Affiliation Directed Abuse (e.g., Content which express negativity against an affiliation. We define affiliation as a (more or less) voluntary association with a collective. Affiliations include but are not limited to: memberships (e.g. Trade unions), party memberships (e.g. Republicans), political affiliations (e.g. Right-wing people) and occupations (e.g. Doctors).) (3) Person Directed Abuse (e.g., Content which directs negativity against an identifiable person, who is either part of the conversation thread or is named. Person-directed abuse includes serious character based attacks, such as accusing the person of lying, as well as aggression, insults and menacing language.) and (4) Counter Speech (e.g., Content which challenges, condemns or calls out the abusive language of others.). Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

Example input: Was Michelangelo straight though? I mean, being a pizza-maniac ninja would indicate so, but... You never know.
Example output: yes
Example explanation: This text has indentity directed abuse because it is trying to judge sexual orientation of Michelangelo. Hence, the answer is "yes"
Q: I am bearded but unmustachioed (I sport a Whaler), and I use the method you describe (though I usually use Barbasol with Aloe for a daily shave, I do occasionally use my boarbrush and a nice shave soap to give myself a proper shave, mostly on the weekends when I can take my time and pamper myself a bit) on my upper lip and neck, largely for the same reason you and the person in the OP have described: Multiblade razors are an overpriced joke. Straight razors give the best shave, oldschool safety razors give the most economical one, and modern razors give both the worst and least economical shave, so what's even the point of such a thing? I used to use a Gillette Mach 3, and thought it was the bee's knees, but my single-bladed, double-edge 1901-style butterfly safety razor, the same style that my father and stepfather both first learned to shave with, the same style that my grandfather used up until he was no longer able to shave himself, the same style that my great-grandmother used to shave her legs (we found one in her house when she passed. We also found her medical anti-hysteria device. That was slightly traumatic). Now, I'm not in the camp that says "if it's older, it's clearly better," but I am of the camp that says "don't always assume that newer means better," because sometimes changes are made for the better, and sometimes they're made for the sake of making changes. When a newer method works better, then by all rights we should switch to it, but we shouldn't "upgrade" just because a newer model exists even though it's worse than the old one.
A:
no