input: (CNN) -- The United States breached international law by executing a Mexican national without having granted him consular access, the U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights said Friday.

Navi Pillay, in a statement, said she deeply regrets the execution of Humberto Leal Garcia, after a 5-4 decision by the U.S. Supreme Court denied him a stay of execution Thursday night.

"The execution of Mr. Leal Garcia places the U.S. in breach of international law," said Pillay, who is on an official mission in Mexico. "What the state of Texas has done in this case is imputable in law to the U.S. and engages the United States' international responsibility."

Pillay said Leal was not granted consular access, which -- as a foreign national -- was his right under Article 36 of the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations.

The denial of access raises concerns about whether Leal got a fair trial, Pillay said.

Leal, who was convicted for the 1994 rape and murder of a 16-year-old girl, was executed Thursday evening by lethal injection in Texas.

Federal officials, including the Obama administration, had tried to persuade Texas Gov. Rick Perry to delay the execution. "The secretary herself is quite disappointed in the outcome in this case," said State Department spokeswoman Victoria Neuland about Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.

"The U.S. government sought a stay of Leal's execution in order to give the Congress time to act on the Consular Notification Compliance Act, which would have provided Leal the judicial review required by international law." 1. Who was killed?
2. What country was he from?
3. In which state did the issue occur?
4. What did Garcia have a right to under an article of the Vienna Convention?
5. What number article details this right?
6. What was it about Garcia that entitled him to this right?
7. What crime did Garcia commit?
8. And what else?
9. Of whom?
10. How was he put to death?
11. True or False: Pillay upholds the decision to execute Garcia.
12. What did she say she feels about it?
13. What body refused to grant a stay of execution?
14. How many voted in support of granting the stay?
15. When was the decision made?
16. What is Pillay doing in Mexico?
17. Who did officials fail to get to delay the execution?
18. Who was dissappointed by what happened?
19. Who is the Secretary?
20. Hillary who?
21. Who was her spokesperson? Return numbered answers in your output.

output: 1. Garcia
2. Mexico
3. Texas
4. consular access
5. 36
6. oreign national
7. rape
8. murder
9. 16-year-old girl
10. lethal injection
11. false
12. regrets
13. U.S. Supreme Court
14. Nine
15. Thursday
16. official mission
17. Federal
18. secretary
19. Hillary
20. Clinton
21. Victoria

input: Seoul (CNN)North Korean leader Kim Jong Un is continuing to rule with an iron fist, having ordered the execution of about 15 senior officials so far this year, according to an assessment by South Korean intelligence agents, a lawmaker who attended a closed briefing said.

Shin Kyung-min, a lawmaker with the New Politics Alliance for Democracy, told a handful of reporters that he had been given the information by the South Korean National Intelligence Service.

CNN cannot independently confirm the executions. The nature of the intelligence supporting the National Intelligence Service allegations was also not immediately clear. North Korea is one of the most closed societies in the world.

According to Shin, intelligence officials say Kim is ruling in an impromptu manner and does not countenance excuses or any views at variance with his own.

He considers those a challenge to his authority, the intelligence officials said, according to Shin.

For example, a senior official with Ministry of Forestry was executed for expressing dissatisfaction with the country's forestry program, the lawmaker said.

North Korean defectors share their ordeals

The vice chairman of the State Planning Commission was executed because he objected to changing the design of a science and technology hall from a rounded shape to one resembling a flower, the intelligence officials said, according to the lawmaker.

And in March, according to the South Korean lawmaker, Kim executed on charges of espionage four members of the Unhasu Orchestra, including the general director, because of a scandal, Shin said.

Kim became North Korea's Supreme Commander in December 2011 following the death of his father, Kim Jong Il. According to the National Intelligence Service, he is reported to have executed 17 senior officials in 2012, 10 in 2013 and 41 in 2014. 1. Who is the leader of North Korea?
2. How many executions have been ordered?
3. What position did the executed people hold?
4. Which organization discovered this?
5. Why were they executed?
6. Can the news organization prove the deaths occurred?
7. Are there any witnesses?
8. Is it dangerous to oppose this country's ruler? Return numbered answers in your output.

output: 1. Kim Jong Un
2. 15
3. senior officials
4. The South Korean National Intelligence Service
5. for expressing dissatisfaction
6. No
7. unknown
8. Yes

input: CHAPTER XXIV.

ALONG THE RIVER.

Matt could do nothing but stare at the freight agent. A man had come there and driven off with the horse and wagon and taken the cases of goods with him. It seemed too bold-faced to be true.

"Our man?" he stammered. "We have no man."

"Didn't you send the man here?" demanded the agent, as he stopped short in his work of checking off packages.

"We certainly did not," returned the young auctioneer. "Andy!" he called out, as he stepped back toward the open door, and a moment later Andy Dilks hurried into the depot.

"He says a man came here, got the cases of goods, and drove off with Billy," cried Matt breathlessly. "You did not send any one here, did you?"

"Certainly not," returned Andy promptly. "When was this?"

"Less than two hours ago," replied the freight agent, and he was now all attention. "Do you mean to say the fellow was a thief?"

"He was!" cried Matt.

"I don't see how he could be anything else," added Andy. "Did he pretend to have an order for the cases?"

"Yes, he had a written order."

"And the bill of lading?"

"N--no, he didn't have that," was the slow reply. "But I thought it was all right. He looked like an honest chap. You had better notify the police at once."

"We will," said Matt. "What sort of a looking fellow was he?"

As best he could the freight agent gave a description of the man who had driven off with the goods and the turn-out. Matt and Andy both listened attentively. 1. Was there a bill of lading?
2. Did he appear to be dishonest?
3. Who needed to be called?
4. Who questioned the agent?
5. And who else?
6. What was his last name?
7. When did he take off?
8. What did he steal?
9. Who did he drive off with?
10. What is Billy?
11. And it was hitched to?
12. What was
13. What was Matt's occupation?
14. Who worked with him?
15. Was the thief emboldened?
16. Was there an order?
17. Was it in writing?
18. Was the bandit a woman?
19. How old was Matt?
20. Who was stared at? Return numbered answers in your output.

output:
1. no
2. no
3. the police
4. Matt
5. Andy
6. Dilks
7. Less than two hours ago
8. the cases of goods
9. Billy
10. the horse
11. a wagon
12. unknown
13. auctioneer.
14. Andy
15. yes
16. yes
17. yes
18. no
19. he was young
20. the freight agent