QUESTION: Please review and verify the attached spreadsheet. Make any corrections to employee info in RED on the spreadsheet As we will not hold a pre-ranking meeting, please provide a pre-rank of 1-5 (see attached rating descriptors) for each employee. COMMERCIAL: Commercial employees are identified by a C in the Peer Group column You should be prepared to represent these employees at the July 9 Commercial PRC meeting COMMERCIAL SUPPORT: Commercial Support employees are identified by a CS in the Peer Group column Non-exempt employees (Clerks/Administrative Assistants/Coordinators) will not participate in a PRC meeting. Your ranking on the spreadsheet 1-3 (see attached rating descriptors under Job Group Participation) will be the final ranking for these employees Note: If your employees used the PEP system to do a self-evaluation, it is important that you review the accomplishments section of the self-eval prior to attending a PRC meeting. This information will be available to display on the screen during the meeting. If you have any questions, call me at 5-3847. Please send the completed spreadsheet to me no later than MONDAY, JUNE 11.
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: Important PRC info-Read and Respond by Monday, June 11
Hey, Carol! How is everyone and everything??? I am always being asked about you, how's the baby, etc. I hope I haven't missed your visit to the office! I'm just working away (next to Dan Lyons, I might add) in my own little world. We are getting help soon and I don't know if Mark mentioned anything to you. Raptor is a "pain" and Mary has undergone trial by fire. I am counting the days until my vacation (to Marfa and Napa) which begins after the legal conference. Do you recall Project Marlin? I think Lance was involved. My memory is really bad if I worked on this deal. There's nothing in Lotus Notes (rats!). Take care (I'm starting to sound like David Mitchell). Sara
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: Project Marlin
<<Publications ASAP.html>> Michelle: Here is that ASAP I mentioned. I will try and recall the person's name with whom I had discussed this at one of the HR meetings. Kerry E Notestine Littler Mendelson, PC 1900 Chevron Tower 1301 McKinney Street Houston, Texas 77010
Answer: ASAP on Immigration Issues in RIF
Here is an email: Dear Paul, CDNOW is welcoming the new year with HUGE savings! For a limited time, hundreds of CDs are just $7.99! Hurry -- when 2001 ends, so does this amazing sale. Read on for all the details, plus more sales and special offers.
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: $7.99 CD Sale Going on Now @ CDNOW!
Q: Please refer to the attached agenda for the offsite meeting scheduled Thursday, September 6 - Friday, September 7. Since all discussions will be informal, PowerPoint presentations are not necessary. Please let me know if you need a room for Wednesday evening.
Propose a subject line
A: Management Committee Offsite
Here is an email: We currently have $21.4 million in reserve for potential Northwest refunds. $10 million currently sits in the LTCA book and $11.4 currently sits in the LTNW book. During the summer, FERC initiated an investigation into the potential of unjust and unreasonable spot prices in the northwest from December of 2000 through June of 2001. Seatlle City Light, Tacoma City Light, Eugene Water and Electric Board, and Sacramento Municipal Utility District all filed claims at FERC for refunds from EPMI. The claims totaled close to $100 million. However, many of these claims were, on their face, spurious. For example, Eugene Water and Electric Board filed for refund of forward purchases which was clearly outside the scope of FERC's proceeding. We hired consultants from Charles River Associates (CRA) to help us with this process. One of their tasks was to apply the CAISO competitive benchmark pricing methodology to the Northwest market. That is, CRA attempted to reverse engineer the CAISO's methodology in order to estimate our Northwest risk. I was informed by our litigation team that EPMI's realistic potential exposure using this methodology was roughly $30 million. We decided to reserve roughly 2/3 of this amount which came to about $21 million. In September a FERC Adminitrative Law Judge heard the case and submitted a draft decision to the FERC. The draft decision recommended against any refunds. This draft decision is supposed to come in front of the FERC commissioners for approval before the end of the year. If this draft decision is approved, it would be appropriate to remove these reserves.
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A:
Northwest Reserves