Question: Sentence A: Bringing this information together, table 3.8 shows the relations among case study applications and design decisions.

Sentence B: Case study applications have no relation to design decisions.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question: The result is that many--perhaps even most--people feel that they have failed to make the cut, no matter how comfortable their lives.
Half of the people with comfortable lives think that they did not make the cut.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Problem: Here is a premise:
'Man's a crackpot.

Here is a hypothesis:
The man is literally addicted to every drug known to man.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Sentence 1: what my what i was going to study and at least i had some interest in a lot of the youth that i come in contact with are they say oh i want to be a doctor i want to be a lawyer why because they make a lot of money

Sentence 2: The main incentive for being doctors and lawyers is the money.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question:
And suppose the total market for advertising doubled . In this highly optimistic scenario, Internet ad spending would be $400 per household.

Does it follow that "The total market for advertising is expected to remain the same for the foreseeable future."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
it is not possible to tell

Question:
Based on the premise "In the case of Japan, there is a compelling intellectual case for a recovery strategy based on the deliberate creation of managed inflation.", can we conclude that "Japan used a recovery strategy that involved creating managed inflation."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
yes