Premise:
"Results-oriented managers view training as an investment rather than an expense."
Hypothesis: Some managers send troublesome employees to training just to get them out of the office.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

it is not possible to tell

input question: A Time story says Levi Strauss faces stiff competition from trendier competitors (Diesel, Tommy Hilfiger, Polo). If this premise is true, does that tell us:"A Time piece says that Levi Strauss has no competition."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: no

Question:
Based on the premise "He swatted at it negligently.", can we conclude that "He was careful in his swatting. "? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
no

Question: Sentence A: now i work and i live in the city so that sort a kind of hung it up i have a few flowers but most of mine are like in barrels and things like that

Sentence B: I live in the country.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question: The imputed financing equals the imputed cost and is recognized as an other financing source.
The imputed financing is the same as the imputed cost.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Problem: Here is a premise:
yes i had yeah i was in public school i was in all honors classes i was also a a National Merit Scholar

Here is a hypothesis:
I did very well in school.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer:
it is not possible to tell