In this task, you're given a review from Amazon. Your task is to generate a rating for the product on a scale of 1-5 based on the review. The rating means 1: extremely poor, 2: poor, 3: neutral, 4: good, 5: extremely good.
One example: These are junk! Both bulbs have burned out within a two month period!! I cannot believe that this company can be in business with such poor quality. I have used infrared lights for my ball python for many years now and I get a varied range of months from a bulb, but I have never gone through two bulbs in a matter of two months! I am very disappointed.
Solution is here: 1
Explanation: The user seems very disappointed in the product. Because the bulb they ordered has been burned out earlier than usual. So, he gave 1 star to the review considering it extremely poor

Now, solve this: Wore these with new pair of shoes that tore up my heels the week before. As a life hack, I have found that KT tape in its original form worked wonders for this purpose in the past, far better than any other blister prevention or bandaid. However, I cannot say the same for the current blister tape Im wearing. After half a day, it has worn completely through, exposing the skin underneath - whereas, any KT tape wearer can attest, true KT tape is so difficult to remove, it often comes with the first layer of skin when you take it off. In other words, save your money and just buy strips of actual KT tape- works way better than this product.
Solution:
3