In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.
One example is below.
Q: Comment: It's bad enough we already have all these American sicko's living in this country shooting up theatre, schools, churches, malls, etc., we don't have room for crazy muslims.
A: Identity-attack
Rationale: This comment contains identity attacks on both American and Muslim.
Q: Comment: Dionne, do you not get tired of your ignorant ruse? You are still using the old canard of "alternative facts," apparently not having the brain power that she mispoke and meant to say the word "data." And she was 100% right; there is alternative data on just about everything. The liberals use outlets and polling services to produce what they already know will be produced for them, false data. So there are alternative data, just as she said. You, then, sir, are to be seen as either 1) totally stupid, or 2) purposely deceptive and devious. While I want to say the former, I suspect the latter, as a party regular and toady.
A:
Non-identity-attack