In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Example input: Comment: Damn! Another cloudy day, and it's all Obama's doing!
Example output: Obscene
Example explanation: This is obscenity because it hints on sexual content that is offensive to the public sense of decency.
Q: Comment: I won't comment on the Alzheimer's or Dementia........ I will say it's possible that Mr. Stahl's letter misrepresented his feelings by linking Judaism and Zionism as perpetrators of a "false flag" plan to utilize anti-Semitic actions to garner support for Zionism. IMO, there's a real difference between Judaism and "hardcore" right-wing Zionism. I, as I note in another post, have concerns with the treatment of non-Israelis by the Zionists, but separate that from my feelings about Judaism. IMO, the anti-Semitic actions we've seen increase since Trump's election are, in fact, the actions of, guess who....................anti-Semitic Americans. Occam's Razor strikes again. Gary Crum
A:
Non-obscene