Problem: BODY: Guys, I need a copy of your PMA's for May, June, and July (or whatever document you have from Risk) that is showing improper debits and credits to your book. I have an appointment with Risk at 2 pm and I will try to get this all sorted out today, but I need to know exactly what you're seeing. Virginia
======
A: SUBJECT: I need a copy of your PMA's

Problem: BODY: The information contained herein is based on sources that we believe to be reliable, but we do not represent that it is accurate or complete. Nothing contained herein should be considered as an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any financial instruments discussed herein. Any opinions expressed herein are solely those of the author. As such, they may differ in material respects from those of, or expressed or published by on behalf of Carr Futures or its officers, directors, employees or affiliates. ? 2001 Carr Futures The charts are now in the most recent version of Adobe Acrobat 4.0 and they should print clearly from Adobe Acrobat Reader 3.0 or higher. Adobe Acrobat Reader 4.0 may be downloaded for FREE from www.adobe.com. (See attached file: AGAMAIL.pdf)
======
A: SUBJECT: AGA Report 12/19

Problem: BODY: I've simulated the Aggregate power portfolio's VAR with the BPA contract (approx. $51MM) as a stand alone (approx $3MM) and with the BPA position reversed out (approx $49MM). Only issue seems to be that the VAR related to the position per credit Agg does not "tie" with VAR related to position in Enpower - I'm attributed this to the peak/off peak simulation difference. Specifically, the credit agg file does not define what was peak or off peak, whereas file from Enpower did, resulting in more accurate measurement of risk. Bottom line is that BPA removal appears to be risk reducing. Frank
======
A:
SUBJECT: BPA removal