Here is an email: GDrake@nyiso.com writes to the NYISO_TECH_EXCHANGE Discussion List: The ICAP Working Group of the New York State Reliability Council ("NYSRC") is posting this message to inform all interested parties of the ability participate, on a "listen-only" basis, in the NYSRC ICAP Working Group Conference Call No. 11 scheduled for September 18, 2001, starting at 9:00A.M. The Working Group is an open meeting in accordance with NYSRC Policy No. 2, which is available of the NYSRC web site at "www.nysrc.org", on the "Policies" web page. Those wishing to participate on a "listen-only" basis can call (225) 383-8961, and enter participant Code 568801, starting at 9:00 A.M. Participants will be required to place their telephones on mute so as not to prevent other parties from participating. Those who plan on listening to the meeting shall send an email to my attention at "mhogan@cenhud.com" with the names of the individuals and organizations participating. Those who are not NYSRC ICAP WG Members or Alternate Members will be given an opportunity to comment at the end of each meeting, or earlier at the Chairman's invitation.
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: NYSRC ICAP W/G conf call 9/18
Here is an email: Jason, Your ENA-IM-WC-NOCAL Book has been set up for US financial and physical Gas, your financial gas trades will flip to ENA-FT-WC-NOCAL. User ID: ADM23542 Password: WELCOME! Please feel free to call me with any questions,
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: EnronOnline Book ID
Here is an email: Tracy and James, Elaine and Phil thought it would be nice to include this summary page in the plan review package for Stan's review next week. I think Rod mentioned that Stan has set a target for Phil of 5.0MM for 2002. Please advise if this is still valid because Phil personally has not heard that from Stan. The numbers that we have in Adaytum match the $4.4 MM net contribution. The remaining $0.6MM are salary offsets on NNG. 42P does not have employees and they use NNG employees. When they do that, NNg charges the salaries of the employees for the applicable # of hours to 42P. Therefore, 42P covers expenses that NNG would have to bear otherwise. Phil feels that the $0.6MM of salaries offsets should be counted toward the 5.0 target since it's a benefit that 42P brings to NNG. James and I talked about this on the phone. Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns. Thanks!
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A:
ETS Operations companies (1202, 42P, and 184)