TASK DEFINITION: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
PROBLEM: Editorial corrections are late to the party. If you write a letter to the RG, be advised that it will get "filtered" and modified thru an editor's opinion even if it doesn't improve the clarity of your opinion. More often than not, it detracts from the intent of the author, as in this case. They also omit entire sentences for their own reasons. It's very condescending and similar to dogs marking fire hydrants.

Some letters might need spiffing for grammar and spelling but wholesale edits and omissions amount to censoring.

SOLUTION: No

PROBLEM: Political Correctness has ceased to have any altruism and has now run so far off the tracks that we literally can't use certain words for fear that some obvious "Cunt" will spend time... not time protesting the actual act of colonialism but the literal use of the word colonialism.

What a fucking joke liberalism has become that these people who own and built a business, working hard to make a real tangible thing, exist in a world where "words" from "Cunts" can actually destroy it all!

Count me in for dinner tonight!

SOLUTION: Yes

PROBLEM: Show me the statistics which support your position and that they didn't come out of your buttocks.

SOLUTION:
Yes