We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control) into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Input: Consider Input: Sent1: Also once you become an agent of the government you stop having right, you have authorities and you're controlled by the people the Constitution is supposed to protect you against.
Sent2: I think laws stating that you should not be allowed to carry guns onto airplanes or into schools are examples of common sense gun control laws meant to protect people.

Output: Not similar

Input: Consider Input: Sent1: This appeared to me to be an argument that self defense cannot exist if a gun is used.
Sent2: The question is whether or not it really matters if guns were used less for self defense and more for aggression.

Output: Not similar

Input: Consider Input: Sent1: Law abiding citizens obey the law, there can surely be no reason to prohibit them form having guns.
Sent2: Criminals that do not obey gun control laws will be able to obtain guns and use them on the unarmed law-abiding citizens.
Output: Not similar