Christine: My apologies. My schedule melted down after we talked on Monday. Here's where folks came out. There's some concern about size. We're supposed to be no larger than 3, but we lobbied Aceves and he apparently Ok'd our "oversized" group. The other folks in the group--who talked to him
Answer: Teams
Here is an email: The migration of UNIX home directories and applications (Solar) scheduled for this weekend has been moved to the weekend of October 13 and 14, 2001. Further information as to times and problem escalation procedures will be posted early next week. Bob Ambrocik Enterprise Storage Team EB 3429F x5-4577 bob.ambrocik@enron.com
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: Solar Migration - DATE CHANGE - VERY IMPORTANT
Q: Ed: Rudwell and I would like to talk to you about the form of Trade Guaranty Agreement that has been sent to us. Specifically, we need some clarification on how Section 5 works since some new language has been added to the June 1, 1999 form that we received. Please call me at your convenience to discuss this.
Propose a subject line
A: Trade Guaranty Agreement
IN: Heather, I talked further with Transwestern Counsel today concerning the issues and have the following points; 1. FERC was made aware of the Compression Services arrangement with ECS in the filings for the certification of the Kachina units. FERC simply didn't ask any further questions in that proceeding. The Operation & Maintenance Agreements in place for the Kachina units essentially accomplishes the same tasks as the Operational Control Agreement in Gallup. TW feels the O&M agreements would be adequate to address any concerns about TW's regulatory responsibility over the compressor facilities. The Operational Control agreement was put into place in the Gallup Transaction because it was thought to be easier to give FERC exactly what is was looking for rather than provide them with the Gallup O&M Agreement which might unecessarily complicate the certification process at that time. 2. There is no basis in FERC Regs or the NGA for FERC to impose any type of penalty or discontinue the Compression Service due to TW's operation of Kachina without the Operational Control Agreement. No regs or law address this situation. Again this is tempered by the fact that FERC was made aware of the arrangement and didn't ask any questions and the O&M agreement is in place to accomplish control for TW. 3. I also faxed you a copy of Section 19(c) of the NGA which indicates that the petition for rehearing does not effect the status of the certificate. Construction is moving ahead and the targeted start date is May 1. I will forward the filing TW made wrt to the Operational Control Agreement as soon as I recieve it. Let me know if you have any further questions (713) 853-3512.

Generate a subject line.

OUT: FERC Issues
IN: This is an email
Today the Commission issued a tolling order on our request for rehearing in the PNM capacity docket. As you recall, we asked for rehearing of the Commission's requirement that TW's acquisition of capacity be limited to the summer months. The tolling order is simply FERC's way of buying time to consider our request. In the absence of Commission action within 30 days of our rehearing request, our request would have been deemed denied...so we're doing well so far. There is no deadline for the Commission to act on our request. I'll watch to see whether it appears on the Commission's agenda.

What is the subject?

OUT: PNM capacity: rehearing request
<<Publications ASAP.html>> Michelle: Here is that ASAP I mentioned. I will try and recall the person's name with whom I had discussed this at one of the HR meetings. Kerry E Notestine Littler Mendelson, PC 1900 Chevron Tower 1301 McKinney Street Houston, Texas 77010
Answer:
ASAP on Immigration Issues in RIF