IN: This is an email
Dave, We have made good progress on our NNG accounts receivable clean up effort. We will have a transportation write-off package for you to review later this week. Our previous observation that most of the outstanding dollars are tied to work orders was correct. John Cobb and I spoke and he will focus on researching these work orders and will submit a separate write-off package. My group has prepared some excellent detailed reports that should be useful to John's group. We will let you know if we need assistance from you or your group. Rick

What is the subject?

OUT: NNG A/R Issues
QUESTION: Hey Theresa and Lynn. I just wanted to say that I really enjoyed getting to know you two last week and that I hope we can stay in contact. I typically just meet Regulatory people in my circle so it's good to know people who actually know how their pipeline operates! Lynn - I think I am finally getting the hang of operating those earrings. That Tuesday morning when we were leaving San Fran. the little dangle got cock-eyed and I couldn't get the earring out to fix it. At some point at the airport I managed to get it out. Am much better now. Take care and hope to see both of you soon. Michelle
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: Forum
David and Louise: One of the things that Organic has asked us to keep confidential is "the existence of any business discussions, negotiations or agreements between the parties as well as any information regarding the skills and compensation of employees, contractors or other agents of the disclosing party." This is a departure from our form. Are we prepared to agree to this? Also, to the extent that parties are insisting on using their form of CA, what do you want the approval process to be? Carol
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: Organic Confidentiality Agreement
MARKET NOTICE December 5, 2001 In Re: California Independent System Operator Corporation Docket Nos. ER01-3013-000 and ER01 889-009 Compliance Filing Changes to Provision of Data to CERS Modification to November 30, 2001 Market Notice Modified Implementation Schedule - Changes to Provision of Data to CERS ISO Market Participants: On Friday, November 30, the ISO issued a market notice providing the ISO's schedule for complying with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission ("FERC") November 7 and 20, 2001 orders, that require the ISO, among other things, to stop providing information to the California Department of Water Services, California Energy Resource Scheduling ("CERS") which is not also provided to other Scheduling Coordinators ("SCs"). The ISO has accomplished all milestones as listed through December 3, 2001. The transition planned on December 6 has been shifted until next week. The ISO is making every effort to insure that the transition is a smooth one and seeks some additional time to work with the resources in the California market to gain their cooperation with provision of inc and dec bids at reasonable prices. Specifically the items that were listed in Item 4 of the November 30 market notice to begin at HE 2400 on December 6, 2001 will now occur at 23:59 Wednesday night December 12, 2001. They include: a. The ISO will halt the preferential provision to CERS of the ISO Forecasted net short in the BEEP Stack; b. CERS will no longer engage in OOM purchases; and c. The ISO will dispatch all available Energy from bids in the BEEP Stack for both resources prior to the ISO making OOM purchases. Client Relations Communications.0920 CRCommunications@caiso.com <mailto:CRCommunications@caiso.com>
Answer: CAISO Notice - Modified Implementation Schedule - Changes to Provision of Data to CERS
Here is an email: Region: Europe Status: Resolved Summary: Outlook - script problem Your IT support case number HD0000000463189 has now been closed by dhayes (Daniel Hayes). In order to improve the quality of support we provide, we would like to know if you were satisfied with the service you received on this call. Please select a grade from the list below which best describes the service you received: 1 = Excellent 2 = Good 3 = Satisfactory 4 = Poor 5 = Very Poor and reply with any additional comments you think might be relevant. Thank you for your co-operation.
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: How did IT Support perform on call number HD0000000463189 ?
QUESTION: FYI , this is what Suzanne was talking about. I didn't know any of this was going on. I haven't talked with SN yet. Do you have any comments before i do? m
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS:
Letter from Suzanne Nimocks and Thomas Seitz