QUESTION: please add Fred Lagrasta Vice President for signature authority for ENA Upstream Company, LLC effective immediately. This is pursuant to the restructuring of ENA UPstream and producer wellhead groups sent in a memo to ENA employees 10/24. If you have any questions or comments, please let me know. lisa 5 4766
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: signature authority for ena upstream
Dear Judge Biren: Transwestern Pipeline Company will be offering the following exhibits: 1. Prepared Direct Testimony of Jeffery C. Fawcett on Behalf of Transwestern Pipeline Company in Support of the Comprehensive Settlement Agreement (Exhibit 12, incorporating Exhibit JCF-1) and 2. Prepared Rebuttal Testimony of Jeffery C. Fawcett on Behalf of Transwestern Pipeline Company in Support of the Comprehensive Settlement Agreement (Exhibit 17). Transwestern estimates it will need less than 10 minutes for direct testimony. Transwestern does not at this time intend to cross-examine any witnesses; however, it reserves the right to request a reasonable amount of time to examine witnesses on issues affecting Transwestern to the extent that any party's live testimony differs from or conflicts with its prepared testimony.
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: I.99-07-003
Jeff: The whole team and I very much enjoyed our meeting with you last Friday. We were looking forward to having the opportunity to tell you all about the progress of our business. We felt that the give and take and the dialogue during the course of the meeting was excellent, and we hope that in the future we will be able to have useful dialogues like this at appropriately periodic intervals. To memorialize the follow-up steps from this, we thought it would be useful to write this down so we may remain responsive to your questions regarding our progress. 1. We want to confirm the reasonableness of our net churn numbers; we plan to develop a fact base of churn experience over the course of the next few months and analyze these compared to the original business case model. We would be prepared to review this churn with you in about three months. 2. To analyze the rationale of our hedging of long term contracts against the "disaster" of falling prices; this is to be done against the assumption that our customers will leave us on the basis of strict economic rationality. We believe that providing this type of analysis would be very useful for us as we enter the year 2002 where power and gas prices will be substantially different next year than they are now. We would be prepared to review the results of this analysis with you in the fall. 3. Decompose our net cash burn to indicate the "levers" to reduce that cash burn against unforeseen problems/disasters. We would plan to do this as part of our normal budgeting process for 2002. We would plan to review this with our Board in our fall meeting. We believe that it is the right course of activity to review this with the Board and then follow up with you if there are any questions going forward. We also believe that there could be an opportunity to review the cash burn significantly given the fact that a large part of our cash burn is spent on systems development for entry into specific markets. Jeff, as I said in the beginning, we very enjoyed meeting with you and we hope that we were able to prove to you that we have made substantial progress. I would like to feel that I will have the opportunity to get in touch with you at key juncture intervals during the development of our company. Thanks again for your time.
Answer: June 1 Deep Dive/Houston
Here is an email: John, I met with Con-Ed last week. They asked if Market Link @ Leidy was going to be good liquid point to buy long term supply. I told them that I didn't think so but would do a little research for them. I know you worked pretty hard on this one. Do you have an overview/summary that I could look at including some rough economics.
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: MarketLink
Q: As you may know, Transwestern and Northern entered into "corporate separateness" agreements as part of the recently completed $1 billion secured financing. The gist of those agreements is that the ETS family of companies is subject to new restrictions on their interaction with the rest of Enron. To assure compliance with these new obligations, I'd like to remove ETS personel from the OPI structure. I don't have the full slate of officers and directors in front of me, but I do recall that Dave Neubauer took my old job as OPI president, and I believe Mary Kay Miller and several other ETS folks are still officers and/or directors. Please give me a call at your earliest convenience to discuss. Thanks. DF
Propose a subject line
A: OPI
Here is an email: Hi Gaye, We are looking forward to seeing you and Earl this weekend. We will have 9 for dinner, not counting the 6 year old who will have eaten (although he will eat a piece of bread, if offered). I just hate to pay for a real dinner for him when I know he won't be interested in grown up food. If it isn't too much trouble, could you email me the menu? We will be bringing beer and wine. See you soon (just not soon enough),
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A:
This weekend