Ted, Attached is a revised draft of a letter. Please review and let me know if you have any comments. Please note the following with respect to this issue: 1. We should make sure we have performed a gas analysis at each producers delivery point and are sure they are creating or contributing to the quality problem. I recommend attaching such gas analysis to this letter. 2. The BRG Petroleum Corp. contract doesn't give us any cause to send this letter. The contract requires BRG to meet the quality specs. of the the pipeline which receives the gas downstream of the Point of Delivery on the Confirm. Such Point of Delivery is at the wellhead and HPL is the downstream pipe. HPL's specs (unless they have changed, don't have a limitation on gas richness). 3. The Texlan letter will be slightly modified from the attached, since we will reference Force Majeure. 4. Do we have a accurate list of producer names and address? If you are okay with the letter, I can have a paralegal prepare the letters with addresses.
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: Nacogdoches Letter
Here's a redline against our previous draft. There are lots of holes, in large part due to the significant commercial issues still open and some of FCE's input due on the language to be used. I'm also not finished with the project management/scheduling stuff, but I wanted you to get a chance to look at it forthwith. Scott, I've printed off your emails and will incorporate your input. I don't know when we want to give FuelCells a draft, but I'm going to keep working on this one. Kay
Answer: First revision
Here is an email: gambit (GAM-bit) noun 1. An opening in which a minor piece is sacrificed to obtain a strategic advantage. 2. A maneuver used to secure an advantage. 3. A remark used to open or redirect a conversation. [From Spanish gambito, from Italian gambetto (the act of tripping someone), from gamba (leg).] "North Korea will no doubt try to gain maximum advantage by playing South Korea, America and Japan off against each other. If it fails to get the result - and the cash - it wants from its new diplomatic gambit, it may simply abandon the enterprise." The Two Koreas: Mr Kim, Meet Mr Kim, The Economist (London), Apr 15, 2000. This week's theme: words from chess. ............................................................................ Sin is geographical. -Bertrand Russell, philosopher, mathematician, author,
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: A.Word.A.Day--gambit
Q: Attached is the letter. I am forwarding per Mark's request. Let me know if you have any comments. If everything looks good, let me know and I will create executables. Thanks.
Propose a subject line
A: TW Letter
IN: Craig, Attached please find a revised draft of the Ormet Contract. I have incorporated the language from the Credit Worksheet prepared by Jason Williams. That language is included in Sections 4.2 and 4.3 of the Contract and in the definitions for Material Adverse Change, Guarantor, Funded Debt, Current Ratio, and Net Worth. Regarding Amy Baird's memo, I have made the requested changes in Article 3 of the Contract regarding changing "Schedule" and "Scheduled" to "deliver" and "delivered" and "receive" and "received". I did not add the language requested in (iii) because that language is already included in the definition of "Replacement Price Differential". I included the language she requested under (iv) as (iii) in Section 3.2 I omitted the last sentence relating to consequential damages of $1,000,000 per occurrence as we discussed and left in the language in Section 8.3 which limits the consequential damages to a maximum of $1,000,000 during the term of the Agreement. Likewise, I did not delete the language from Section 8.3 providing that the gas is being supplied solely on the express representations and warranties provided in the Agreement and that all other warranties are being waived. I did delete the language relating to Texas law and sentence starting with "Therefore, the Parties agree that (i) three" because we had agreed to delete the language from Section 4.1 which set forth the method of determining a party's liquidated damages. I added a sentence at the end of Section 8.5 relating to trial before the court with waiver of right to jury trial. I deleted the language relating to arbitration in Appendix 1. As we discussed, I did not make the change to force majeure. We need to discuss this. Our obligation should be limited to having firm transportation on one of the pipelines with interruptible transportation on the other. If the firm transportation is interrupted because of force majeure, our obligation should be limited to using commercially reasonable efforts to cause the volumes to be delivered via the other pipeline if there was available capacity on such other pipeline. Please review the contract and if you agree that it represents your understanding, you may forward it to the folks at Ormet. I will be out of the office on Monday, but will be available by phone.

Generate a subject line.

OUT: Ormet Contract Language
IN: This is an email
Hi Sylvia, Re the GISB for Wisconsin, no we would not agree to the terms of their GISB on the front page or their special provisions. Are you aware we currently have a GISB in place with Wisconsin Public Service Company and ENA as well as with Wisconsin Gas Company?????? Re Master Status: I have devoted my afternoon to this contract in order to complete the redline. Will keep you apprised. Do you still want a copy of our GISB. If so, I will send you a draft however, I need to fill in the name of the counterparty etc. before it goes out.

What is the subject?

OUT:
GISB