input question: However, it is important to clarify what type of problem interveners are attempting to address. If this premise is true, does that tell us:"Most people can ignore the type of problem in this case."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: no

Question:
Based on the premise "He saw the gleam of torchlight in their black eyes.", can we conclude that "The torchlight lit up the demons eyes."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
it is not possible to tell

Question: Sentence A: After all, in a democracy, the halls of justice must always stand wide open and everyone must be welcome to walk through them unimpeded and unchallenged.

Sentence B: Many would agree that we have no choice but to work towards a legal system that delivers on its promises of accessibility.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question: Look for the Cecil Hotel on the western end of the square.
The Cecil Hotel is located around the corner from the square.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Problem: Here is a premise:
Allowances for States with Emissions Rates at or Below 0.80 lbs/mmBtu Section 415 is existing Section 406, which provides additional formulations for Phase II allocations with no substantive changes.

Here is a hypothesis:
Section 406 has more formulations for Phase II allocations.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Question:
so uh what do you plan to do with it

Does it follow that "So you are going to bed soon?"?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
no