Detailed Instructions: In this task, you must classify if a given review is positive/negative, indicating your answer as P or N.
Problem:i 've noticed something lately that i 've never thought of before .
pseudo- substance - hollywood faking deep meanings in their films .
have you ever seen a movie that you really enjoyed , then when you look back , you realize there was something missing ?
more and more , filmmakers seem to be putting out well rehearsed , melodramatic films that evoke strong connotations of being a great film , but if you step aside and reflect on your movie going experience , you may just discover nothing more than elegantly presented fluff .
i 'm not trying to say city of angels is that bad .
it had a lot going for it , but somewhere along the way , it faltered .
somehow , underneath the seemingly poetic beauty of it all , there was a gigantic hole somebody covered with iridescent performances and glossy cinematography .
the predictable ending that shattered our hopes ( even though we saw it coming ) only added to the disappointment .
but for over an hour , city of angels is well worth the time .
nicolas cage is seth , a guardian angel who , like hundreds ( likely thousands or even millions ) of other angels , spends eternity watching over the citizens of mortality ; humans never aware of how much celestial intervention occurs in their life .
meg ryan , in her most subdued performance yet , plays maggie , a doctor who begins to ponder exactly who it is we 're fighting against when we fight to keep someone alive .
after losing a patient on the surgery table , these questions envelope maggie , and seth , the angel who was there to oversee the patient 's transition into the afterlife , is immediately captivated by the doctor .
he begins following and observing maggie , falling more and more in love with her everyday .
angels , who we quickly learn are not and never were humans , can not experience human sensations such as taste and touch , but they do have the ability to make themselves seen to anyone they desire .
seth 's adoration is too much to resist , and eventually he does appear to maggie , quite regularly , although such a thing seems taboo among the angelic community .
the angels are interestingly presented , all of them dressed in black and more reminiscent of hitmen than traditional glowing white entities , but it 's a nice touch that never seems like a mere attempt at uniqueness .
cage is a wonderfully versatile actor ( think face / off , raising arizona , and it could happen to you - what a combo ! ) who slips into the role of a heavenly agent quite nicely but threatens sappiness more than once .
it 's nice to see ryan pick up roles like this and the one in courage under fire .
the two are n't very comparable to each other , but they both deviate from her usual " intelligently ditzy " romantic comedy roles , and it 's an impressive side of ryan movie goers rarely have the chance to enjoy .
but even though the two leads do an impressive job
, it is dennis franz who grabs us with his interpretation of a hospital patient who knows more than meets the eye .
it 's a shame that with so much going for it , city of angels falters so much in its final stages , leaving us with the realization that an emotionally incredible movie was out there , they just did n't know quite how to get to it .
they struggle for an impacting conclusion and wind up with painful thud rather than an exhilarating high .
filmmakers should know your final impression will be the one you linger on , remember , and convey to others thru word of mouth , so after telling us for 60 + minutes that this film is a glorious masterpiece , they sure leave us with a disheartening taste of mediocrity in our mouths .
based on the german film wings of desire ( that being the english title , of course ) , city of angels is ninety percent success , enough to make most people forgive its shortcomings , even the devastatingly disappointing ending .
most movie goers , the non - cynics anyway , will be too wrapped up in the surreal atmosphere to give criticism to that which needs to be criticized .
nonetheless , city of angels is beautifully captivating , which is probably enough to satisfy those poetic viewers who will appreciate a delve into rich emotional territories .
Solution:
P