Jeff, Jim and I spoke today about having Enron participate separately in this proceeding -- responding to the utilities' plans to be filed today. I believe that AReM will take a strong position and will incorporate any comments we have. I don't see anything we can gain by paying for a separate filing under Enron's name. Jim agreed. Jim asked that you call him if you have major concerns with this approach.
Answer: Implementation of DA Suspension--Enron participation
Here is an email: I have enclosed the final version of the Letter Agreement. Please have appropriate representatives of Wilde and MasTec sign at the space indicated below and return this to me by fax at 713-646-3393. Once I have received the signed faxes, I will allow the wire transfer to proceed.
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: Wilde/MasTec Letter Agreement
Q: Laurie: My info is below. I'll call you at 2 pm Houston (3 pm NY) to discuss the ISDA which we'll email shortly. Please feel free to call before then. Thanks.
Propose a subject line
A: Merrill/Allegheny transaction
IN: John, he did well with the gas guys, so lets make him an offer. Get with m= e=20 and we'll go over the offer. Thanks. Jeff

Generate a subject line.

OUT: Interview Thank You from Mario De La Ossa
IN: This is an email
Hi gang. I'm fairly certain I entered this parking deal wrong for Feb. We will have to look at it next week. Deal 162283 and 162282. We parked gas at S. Commack on Iroq and I think the counterparty should be CPR Exchange as opposed to Iroquois. we will chat.

What is the subject?

OUT: Iroq parking deal
Congratulations to you both! Your designation as V.Ps. is richly deserved! Just among us "constrained technical" people, however, couldn't they have come up with a better description of our category? It makes us sound like we are deficient in something other than just career choice! See you soon--beers are on me! DF
Answer:
The Memo