Q: (CNN) -- Scotland's Paul Lawrie carded a final round seven-under-par 65 on Sunday to win the Qatar Masters by four strokes, his second victory in the tournament.

The 43-year-old -- who also won in Doha in 1999, the year he went on the lift the British Open -- recorded a 15-under-par aggregate of 201, clear of Australian Jason Day and Sweden's Peter Hanson, in an event reduced to 54 holes because of high winds.

Holding a one-shot lead after Saturday's second round, Lawrie produced a bogey-free 18 holes, with a brilliant eagle on the par-five ninth the highlight of his round.

Day matched Lawrie's 65, and briefly threatened after opening with four successive birdies, but two dropped shots soon afterwards halted his charge.

Meanwhile, Hanson posted a 67 to follow up consecutive 69s to ensure he shared second place.

"I don't think I can play much better than that," Lawrie told the official European Tour website.

"I've been playing well for a long, long time, but it's just nice to come out one ahead and shoot seven- under-par.

"When you've got a chance to win a tournament you don't sleep as well the night before and things go racing through your mind," he added.

"You've got to get back to basics and I did that. I hit some nice shots coming in."

John Daly matched his opening 67 to finish alone in fourth place, six shots off the leader, while Sergio Garcia was one of four players who finished a further shot behind.

1. 43
2. 65
3. Qatar Masters
4. seven-under-par
5. No
6. unknown
7. Doha
8. Jason Day
9. Peter Hanson
10. No
11. No
12. the night before

Numbered questions:
1. How old is Paul Lawrie?
2. What did he score on the last round?
3. What contest did he win?
4. How much did he win by?
5. Was it his first win in the tournament?
6. What number win was it?
7. Where did he win in 1999?
8. Who was golfing for Australia?
9. and Sweden?
10. Did Lawrie think he could have played much better?
11. Has he been playing well for a very short time?
12. When does he not sleep well?

input: Make use of the article to answer the questions. (CNN) -- At first glance, they could almost pass for masterpieces by Monet or Renoir.

But these impressionist-style paintings -- which are changing hands for thousands of dollars -- were painted by a five-year-old girl who is unable to speak.

Meet Iris Halmshaw, an autistic child from Leicestershire, UK, who has been producing these striking artworks since she was three.

She has autism, a condition that has made her unable to communicate except through the medium of art.

"From the first painting, she filled the paper with color and it wasn't random -- it was considered and thought out," says her mother, Arabella Carter-Johnson.

"She was so excited and happy I knew that we had found a key into her world and a way of interacting with her."

Autism changed everything

The journey started when Iris was two. Carter-Johnson and her husband, Peter-Jon Halmshaw, realized that something was wrong: she had not picked up any words, and rarely made eye contact.

"We researched it ourselves," her mother recalls, "but as parents, you are always hoping that there was some other explanation."

Iris was officially diagnosed as a child with autism. According to Carter-Johnson, the doctor was "depressing" because he told them that very few therapies worked.

Not to be deterred, the couple embarked on "long nights of research", which led them to the idea of art therapy.

The little girl picked up painting techniques astonishingly quickly, and before long was spending much time at work on her canvases.

Remarkably for a child of her age, her sessions involved about two hours of consistent concentration. 1. Where does Iris live?
2. What was thought out?
3. who said this?
4. When did her parents start to think something was wrong?
5. why?
6. What did they do first?
7. Was she ever offically diagnosed?
8. with what?
9. were there a lot of options for help?
10. how did that make the parents feel?
11. Were they able to find a therapy?
12. what?
13. How did they find that?
14. How did Iris do with it?
15. How long were her sessions?
16. What type of paintings does she do?
17. Is she selling them?
18. for how much?
19. What could these pass for?
20. Does Iris speak?
numbered_answers: 1. Leicestershire, UK,
2. her art
3. her mother
4. when she was two
5. she had not picked up any words, and rarely made eye contact.
6. research
7. yes
8. autism.
9. No
10. depressed
11. yes
12. art therapy.
13. long nights of research
14. The little girl picked up painting techniques astonishingly quickly,
15. 2 hours
16. impressionist-style paintings
17. yes
18. 1000's of dollars
19. Monet or Renoir.
20. no

CHAPTER IV.

A LITTLE MUSIC.

After lunch, Herbert Le Breton went off for his afternoon ride--a grave social misdemeanour, Ernest thought it--and Arthur Berkeley took Edie round to show her about the college and the shady gardens. Ernest would have liked to walk with her himself, for there was something in her that began to interest him somewhat; and besides, she was so pretty, and so graceful, and so sympathetic: but he felt he must not take her away from her host for the time being, who had a sort of proprietary right in the pleasing duty of acting as showman to her over his own college. So he dropped behind with Harry Oswald and old Mrs. Martindale, and endeavoured to simulate a polite interest in the old lady's scraps of conversation upon the heads of houses, their wives and families.

'This is Addison's Walk, Miss Oswald,' said Berkeley, taking her through the gate into the wooded path beside the Cherwell; 'so called because the ingenious Mr. Addison is said to have specially patronised it. As he was an undergraduate of this college, and a singularly lazy person, it's very probable that he really did so; every other undergraduate certainly does, for it's the nearest walk an idle man can get without ever taking the trouble to go outside the grounds of Magdalen.'

'The ingenious Mr. Addison was quite right then,' Edie answered, smiling; 'for he couldn't have chosen a lovelier place on earth to stroll in. How exquisite it looks just now, with the mellow light falling down upon the path through this beautiful autumnal foliage! It's just a natural cathedral aisle, with a lot of pale straw-coloured glass in the painted windows, like that splendid one we went to see the other day at Merton Chapel.' What are the answers to this following set of questions: 1. Who went on an outing?
2. Where did they go?
3. Did Arthur wish he could be alone with her?
4. Who did?
5. Was she very plain looking?
6. When did they leave for the outing?
7. Who else went out?
8. Was he on foot?
9. Was it bright out?
10. Was it during the summer?
11. What time of year was it?
12. What was special about the windows?
13. Who was attending the school?
14. Had they seen anything similar before?
15. When?
16. Where?
17. Was Edie a callous person?
18. What is the trail called?
19. Why was it named that?
20. How is he described?
Answer:
1. Ernest-Arthur Berkeley and Edie
2. The college and gardens.
3. No
4. Ernest
5. No, she was pretty.
6. After lunch
7. Herbert Le Breton
8. No, a ride
9. No, the light was mellow
10. no.
11. Autumn.
12. They were painted.
13. Mr. Addison
14. Yes.
15. The other day.
16. Merton Chapel.
17. No.
18. Addison's Walk
19. Mr. Addison patronised the path.
20. Ingenious