In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.

Ex Input:
Comment: Why would you assume that because I feel the US flag should be respected, that somehow makes me support racism? That's a completely ignorant statement, and a big reason no reasonable person will give anything you say credibility. You are part of the problem.

Ex Output:
Non-threat

Ex Input:
Comment: Stop or I will stab myself I swanee...

Ex Output:
Threat

Ex Input:
Comment: To reprise a well-used term by the left on these pages, "False equivalency".

The Libs are either woefully naive or dangerously ideological on this issue, and have upped their hypocrisy to new levels.

When a Muslim attacked Parliament Hill and killed a solider, the Liberals characterized the incident as a lone wolf attacker and lectured Canadians to not scapegoat all Muslims in the process. Justin Trudeau went on to encourage Canadians to offer compassion in considering the circumstances which may give rise to radicalization.

When a schizophrenic white supremacist kills an anti-right protester with his car, this is construed as the first victim in the second coming of the Third Reich. An author offers pretty much the same comments that Trudeau did and gets absolutely slammed as enabling or excusing nao-naziism.

...continued

Ex Output:
Non-threat