You will be given a definition of a task first, then an example. Follow the example to solve a new instance of the task.
In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: insult and non-insult. Insult is any lanugage or act that is disrespectful or scornfully abusive.

Comment: your posts shows you are stupid period
Solution: Insult
Why? This comment is insult because it is scornful and disrespectful.

New input: Comment: It is interesting to me that the Francis' opening remarking to the synod on the Family convey an important directive: speak what is on your mind and in your heart, -without "human respect' - and accord others the right to do the same. This is a directive underlying any indigenous circle process. Theologically it is an opening for parrhesia- free speech - and if adhered to -which is a big "if"- which will non-violently change things.
However, he seem to be surrounded by a legion of veterans left over from the Wojtyla-Ratzinger years who have self-liturgized as inviolable objects of human respect, and who themselves fear nothing more than this very parrhesia. That's Francis' principal frustration.
But hey, Wojtyla and Ratzinger's main social achievement was to preside over the decline of Catholicism in it a birth place -Europe. Something needs to be done about that. And restoration movements, just don't cut the mustard -if through lack of interest, there is any mustard left to cut.
Solution:
Non-insult