In this task, you are given a passage which has a question and the context. You have to generate an answer to the question based on the information present in the context.

[Q]: Context: B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) correlates with cardiac filling pressures and outcomes in patients with heart failure. In heart transplant recipients, we hypothesize that a within-individual change in BNP over time would be more helpful than absolute BNP in detecting International Society of Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) grade 2R or greater rejection.', 'N-terminal pro-BNP (NT-proBNP) levels were measured in 146 consecutive transplant recipients undergoing routine endomyocardial biopsies. In the cross-sectional analysis, multiple observations per individual were accounted for using generalized estimation equations.', "A cross-sectional analysis demonstrated a weak association between NT-proBNP levels and rejection, with an odds ratio (OR) of 1.01 for every 100-pg/mL increase in NT-proBNP (p = 0.02). However, with a doubling of an individual's NT-proBNP level, the OR for significant rejection was 2.9 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.2-7.0), the OR with a 5-fold increase was 9.1 (95% CI, 2.7-31.5), and the OR with a 10-fold increase was 27.7 (95% CI, 5.9-129). A 10-fold increase in NT-proBNP offered a negative predictive value of 95% for the diagnosis of rejection. The relationship between within-individual increases in NT-proBNP and rejection persisted after adjusting for a fall in ejection fraction and a rise pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, and was a stronger predictor than changes in these parameters.\Question: Does the change in B-type natriuretic peptide levels over time predict significant rejection in cardiac transplant recipients?
[A]: There is a strong, graded relationship between the within-individual increase in NT-proBNP and the odds of significant rejection independent of hemodynamic parameters. These results suggest that the change in NT-proBNP rather than absolute BNP levels may offer a non-invasive approach to detect rejection.

[Q]: Context: The aim of this study was to assess the effect of the implementation of evidence-based guidelines and subsequent feedback to surgeons in the management of acute pancreatitis.', 'An evidence-based Pancreatitis Proforma was developed. Data were prospectively recorded (01/06/2005-30/09/2007). Audit feedback (AFB) was performed at 9 months. A final analysis was performed comparing outcomes pre- and post-audit feedback.', '372 patients were included. Median age (range) was 57 (12-96) years. 168 (45.2%) patients were admitted pre-AFB. Post-AFB, there was a significant increase in the number of patients whose diagnosis was made within 48 hours (135/168 (80.4%) vs 189/204 (92.6%), p<0.001) and who underwent definitive treatment for mild biliary pancreatitis (33/61 (54.1%) vs 56/70 (80.0%), p=0.002). Post-AFB there was also a significant reduction in the number of computed tomography (CT) scans performed for patients with mild acute pancreatitis (23/85 (27.1%) vs 13/99 (13.1%), p=0.018). Mortality (9/168 (5.4%) vs 3/204 (1.4%), p=0.040) also decreased. On multivariate analysis, AFB was an independent factor for change in the use of CT scans (p=0.015) and management of patients with mild biliary pancreatitis (p=0.039).\Question: Is closing the audit loop necessary to achieve compliance with evidence-based guidelines in the management of acute pancreatitis?
[A]: For evidence-based guidelines to be effective, feedback to surgeons is necessary.

[Q]: Context: Hypothyroidism is a common endocrine disease associated with increased oxidative stress, increased cardiovascular (CV) risk, CV events and endothelial dysfunction. Endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) are a well-known marker of CV risk.', 'The aim of this work was to ascertain whether hypothyroidism is associated with lower EPC counts and if treatment with levothyroxine (LT4) or selenium (Se) improves EPC counts compared to placebo.', "Hypothyrod patients (n = 100) were randomly divided into five groups to receive placebo (group A), LT4 (group B) or Se at doses of 83 g (group C), 166 g (group D) or 249 g (group E) for 3 months. Each group comprised 20 patients: 10 with 'mild' hypothyroidism and 10 with 'severe' hypothyroidism. A healthy control group (group F) with 20 euthyroid subjects was also recruited. Subjects had to be free of CV disease, diabetes and drugs that interfere with EPCs. Anthropometric measurements (height, weight, BMI), blood pressure, fasting lipids and EPC analyses were performed at baseline and after 3 months.", 'EPC counts were significantly lower in hypothyroid patients compared to controls. EPCs increased after 3 months of treatment with LT4, but not with Se at any dosage. CD133+ and CD34+ EPC counts were negatively correlated with thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH; r (2) = 0.523, p < 0.01 and r (2) = 0.517, p < 0.01, respectively) and positively correlated with FT4 (r (2) = 0.394, p < 0.01 and r (2) = 0.369, p < 0.01, respectively). TSH and FT4 were the only predictors of EPC counts.\Question: Does levothyroxine but Not Selenium Increases Endothelial Progenitor Cell count in Patients with Hypothyroidism?
[A]:
Hypothyroidism is associated with low EPC counts. Treatment with LT4, but not Se, can improve EPC counts.