In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.

[Q]: Comment: as far as I am concerned you can switch the sexes and I don't change what I think.
[A]: Non-threat

[Q]: Comment: Fire the abusers!
[A]: Threat

[Q]: Comment: I'm not reproaching him for not writing his Q editorials. I'm reproaching him for the poorer quality of his new podcast which sounds amateurisf & eccentric, relying on lots of silly-sounding word play for "style", compared to the quality of "his" Q editorials. I do think CBC wrongly let listeners imagine those Q editorials might have been Jian's creations when CBC should have been more up front about their origin.

TV talk shows credit their writers as the credits roll at the end of shows. Anyone can easily look up online songwriter credits for any pop singer's song. I only learned via an article AFTER Ghomeshi left Q who the main writer of those Q editorials was. There was a belated article about him. He lived in the Maritimes. His name escapes me now. I could be wrong, but I don't think his name was ever mentioned on the Q show itself, but should have been,
[A]:
Non-threat