instruction:
Categorize the comment on the basis of toxicity. If the comment is toxic (harmful, malicious, derogatory, threat, insult, identity attck, etc.) output Yes, otherwise output No.
question:
Epstein is reckless in her assertions and she demonstrates a complete inability to think strategically. What is really in play here is the typical knee jerk reaction from environmentalists who oppose any development, at any time, of any kind. Epstein uses the fiscal problems Alaska has as an excuse to stop responsible development.

Not all projects are equal. Yet Epstein lumps them all together, which is foolish.

Building hydroelectric projects is strongly supported by Interior residents who want the jobs and clean energy a project like Susitna would foster.

Currently the cities of Fairbanks and North Pole have the worst air quality in the state, and the nation. People in the Interior are at increased risk of stroke, heart attack, and cancer due to the dangerously polluted air they breath. Scientific research by the BMJ backs this up- as well as epidemiological data. But Epstein does not seem to care about this- or she is ignorant of just how bad things are in the Interior.
answer:
No

question:
Regardless to how anyone here feels...state legislators can vote all day long to take away merit increase but the fact if the matter is that it is illegal for them to do so....the state has a legally binding contract in which these merit increase are guaranteed ...should the state seek to blatantly violate the terms of the there collective bargaining agreement each Union has the right to sue the state of Alaska for those compensation and more ...and these unions will win these law suits as the state has no ground or right to supersede these legally binding agreements...ultimately they may take the merit increase away for a short while, but the state will end up spending a lot more money in legal fees and man hours plus they will end up retro paying every state employee for these merit increases...they have to know this ....it is not complicated ...so unless they are truly idiotic they will abandon the HB and wait to renagotiate term with each new contract whe they come up...
answer:
Yes

question:
Those two are the sort who give white trash a bad name.
answer:
Yes