Premise:
"Her rulings always have a firm foundation behind them no matter which party is adversely affected, Wong said."
Hypothesis: She makes rulings without thinking them through.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

no

input question: Most dramatic is the northern Porte d'Enfer (Gate of Hell), where the waves have sliced a huge chasm into the limestone shoreline. If this premise is true, does that tell us:"The limestone shoreline was formed due to tectonic shifting."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: it is not possible to tell

Question:
Based on the premise "And what is this new, depraved revelation?", can we conclude that "This recent, corrupt revelation, what is it?"? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
yes

Question: Sentence A: The small man drew a shining dagger from within his cloak but instead of attacking the merchant he went after the girl.

Sentence B: The man slashed violently at the girl.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question: But it's a significant shortfall if you are sufficiently present-minded to recall that Congress (and the president) have separately committed themselves to mammoth--and almost entirely unspecified--cuts in the magical year of 2002, when the budget is to alight, if only for a moment, on balance.
Congress has committed themselves to making major budget cuts.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Problem: Here is a premise:
Moreover, China would accept nothing but silver bullion in exchange for its goods, so Britian had to look for a more abundant commodity to square its accounts.

Here is a hypothesis:
The only payment that China would accept for its goods was silver bullion.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer:
yes