Question:
These additions may have made sense when they were made, but their cumulative effect has been to create a government in which many agencies cannot say just what business they are in.

Does it follow that "Government agencies can always declare what they do. "?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
no

Q: If This is just a bit of spite on his part., can we say that "He was never spiteful to anyone."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A: no

Premise:
"But I did not take it to her. "
Hypothesis: I wouldn't bring it to her.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

yes

input question: During the Empire Period, an ambitious Hittite king, Mutawallis, defeated the forces of the Egyptian pharaoh, Ramses II, at Kadesh (Syria) in 1285 b.c. If this premise is true, does that tell us:"Mutawallis, during the Empire Period, defeated Ramses II in 1286 b.c., which led him to death."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: it is not possible to tell

Question:
Based on the premise "The new King resumed the ways of the two previous monarchs, abolishing laws against adultery and prostitution and taking up with his half sister; but powerful interests, particularly those of the flourishing foreign business community (which would be increasingly dominated by the descendants of the first missionaries), were intent on usurping the throne, in effect if not in name.", can we conclude that "The new King did nothing for any new laws and had no enemies."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
no

input question: How agitated she had 118 been on that fatal Tuesday evening! If this premise is true, does that tell us:"It was in her nature to be anxious about something and that day was no different."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer:
no