In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Ex Input:
Comment: While I agree with the basics of your thought (the Legislature failed us), to think the chief thief would not have vetoed the PFD is foolishness. That man wants our PFD, and nothing will stop him. The Legislature could have hacked the budget with a light saber, and Walker would have still capped our PFD.

Ex Output:
Non-sexual-explicit

Ex Input:
Comment: Don't try to be a comedian.Youre about as funny as your comrades from Russia. Get over yourself commie Parnell.

Ex Output:
Non-sexual-explicit

Ex Input:
Comment: Victor, Thanks for this 'column'! Of course there is only one problem with this report. It is too short. There is so much more 'going on out there'.
But nothing going on in Hawaii other than the "Grapes of Wrath" responses we hear about on the news.
As Edmund Burke said, "When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall one by one, an unpitied sacrifice in a contemptible struggle." [In Hawai'i's case, the bad men are those whose covetousness blinds them to the unfairness of zoning and the need for regulating the housing market.

Ex Output:
Non-sexual-explicit