Question:
Based on the premise "Such a state, with a constitution and identical rights for all citizens, could guarantee long-term security in a way that the current fake peace doesn't.", can we conclude that "The state that is referenced is Georgia."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
it is not possible to tell

Question: Sentence A: The usefulness and appropriateness of using cranes in an FGD installation is dependent on several factors, including the ability to physically place a crane on site or adjacent to the site (e.g.

Sentence B: The ability to physically move a crane had a large influence on the usefulness of the operation.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question: This misses the point.
The thing that I did missed the point.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Problem: Here is a premise:
It was artistically corded.

Here is a hypothesis:
There was no trace of an artistic touch to the corded rope.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Sentence 1: Don't ask me why there was hay- these southern towns can be quaint like that.

Sentence 2: There wasn't hay on this big modern city.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: no

Premise:
"um-hum um-hum they had you pegged"
Hypothesis: You're going to get away with it since they can't peg you.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
no