Question:
It explains why Gore is almost certain to defeat Bradley in the caucuses tomorrow because voters prefer the man of action to the man of ideas.

Does it follow that "Gore, as a man of action, is almost certain to defeat Bradley in the caucuses tomorrow."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
yes

Q: If He left gelded and bled to death a day later., can we say that "He stopped the bleeding and survived."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A: no

Premise:
"Observe it, too, in the brilliance of midday, for then it is utterly, dazzlingly white."
Hypothesis: Watch it too, in the brightness of midday.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

yes

input question: I sure had me a real snootful an' I guess I was jus' fightin' th' war all over again. If this premise is true, does that tell us:"He had fought in the war when he was younger."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: it is not possible to tell

Question:
Based on the premise "There must be no hushing up.", can we conclude that "There must be hushing up."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
no

input question: If I don't agree, likely you'll trip up m' foreleg an' reshoe me anyway. If this premise is true, does that tell us:"You will succeed in spite of my opinions."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer:
no