This is the content of an email: Larry Anderson with Carr has called to inquire about ENA financials and an Enron Corp. guaranty. From an historical perspective, it has always been my understanding that Enron Corp. did not wish to provide guaranties to brokers and we have been successful in that regard with several recent exceptions. In particular, Enron Corp. provided Carr with a "comfort letter" reciting the corporate "policy of general financial responsibility and interest in seeing that subsidiaries act responsibly." [letter dated February 16, 1999] Such letter is no longer sufficient to satisfy Credit Agricole which owns Carr. Joe, I believe that Larry may have already spoken with you. I don't know if your conversation included discussion of a guaranty. Please let me know how you would like to proceed. Thanks.

Subject: Carr Futures, Inc. ("Carr") request for guaranty

This is the content of an email: I sent three names to you for my reviewers. Laura Wente, Mark Whitt, Gerald Nemec. You may want to add someone from the desk - your discretion. Thanks

Subject: List of Reviewers

This is the content of an email: Dear Dr. Lay: As a stockholder, I am as upset as you, most Enron employees and other co-shareholders are given Enron's recent performance due to questionable management by scrupulous officers at Enron. As an ex-employee, I have seen many signs of a major collapse, given the fact that Enron's values (such as Respect, Integrity, Communicatons and Excellence) were simply not followed by Enron's officers and senior members of management. There are examples, such as in Panama, Palestine, and the Dominican Republic. One bad deal after the other with questionable economics and accounting to make each deal look good for the personal benefit of one individual in charge. It is about time that you get rid of these individuals and bring Enron back to what you have built over the years to be a successful company. Regards,

Subject: stockholder comments

This is the content of an email: Be careful using IMC Canada to prepare your draft from. Even though we have chosen NY law, we had two Canadian companies entering into the IMC Canada agreement so there is language in the agreement that is Canadian specific, and it might be missing some required US language. I have also attached a redlined draft reflecting the negotiated changes to the form since the form we first sent the form to the counterparty. I have attached our current form of ISDA Schedule as a reference. The Canadian changes will be color coded, so you can see them easily. Also, please note: there have been recent amendments to the CFTC Rules that have required certain changes to the swap reps, in particular there are no longer "eligible swap participants", the current terminology is "eligible contract participant". Please see Part 5(b) of the Schedule in particular.
Subject: IMC Canada