In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: Notely has said: "I haven't changed his mind. He is still very committed to standing up for his constituents. And that is fine. But I am still going to come out here and make my case."
_____________________________

The fact that the Alberta Premier acknowledges that BCers have to be "stood up for" because the Alberta Premier is lobbying for an American-owned Company on behalf of giving raw assets to China, is the most disturbing part of this ordeal.

This is NOT for Canada or for Canadians and even trying to bully BC to be destroyed for a Chinese market and for American companies to profit on that is treason and IRRESPONSIBLE + RECKLESS.

Raise your royalty rates in Alberta on the projects YOU ALREADY HAVE and create jobs cleaning up all the oil sludge spills THAT YOU CURRENTLY have. Tax the foreign-owned head offices in Calgary and send the temporary foreign workers home, do not extort BC and do not endanger OUR LIVES for TOXIC SLUDGE.

Output: Disagree

Input: Consider Input: Comment: Paul Heinbecker is a leftist apologist and totally lacking in any sense of balance or believeability. Just the type of qualifications required for a Liberal patronage posting

Output: Disagree

Input: Consider Input: Comment: I find it almost comical that some people are actually tying to convince the Residents that taking half of the PFD is being done in an effort to SAVE the PFD. The fact of the matter is that the very same Republican led Government that squandered our oil revenue, and placed the state in this position, did so fully intending to try and get their greedy hands on the PFD. There has been no real effort to correct the give away of Alaska's money to non-producing oil companies. This gave them what they have been looking for for years, a way to get at the PFD. Demand side economics says that the more disposable income that each individual household has , the healthier the overall economy will be. Pushing the supply side agenda simply moves the money to the top so it can "trickle down ". It is a scam plain and simple. The only accomplishment will be the theft, once again, of millions of dollars from state residents. Greed motivates this sham of a state Government, and not the economy.
Output: Agree