Question:
Based on the premise "Free speech and free elections were not the only gambling was legalized and nude bathing was sanctioned.", can we conclude that "Free speech was legalized."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
yes

Question: Sentence A: The compromise that has developed is to include in the evaluation the questions of interest to the customer and to permit the researchers to determine what data elements are relevant to these questions and from whom and how they should be collected.

Sentence B: Researchers are free to choose their focus groups.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Question: money that you can touch but it's tax deferred and yields a higher rate in general than what we can get in CD's and gets life it's a it's a term life policy also
It's tax deferred, so you cannot touch it and it's a loss.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Problem: Here is a premise:
it's better for for a large yard

Here is a hypothesis:
It's more convenient for a big yard.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Sentence 1: I will assume that you mean platonic.

Sentence 2: I assume you mean in a sexual way.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: no

Premise:
"oh well that's neat"
Hypothesis: Oh well, that is very good indeed.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
yes