Don: There are Oasis requests for Ameren with your name on them for which deals are missing in Enpower - nothing in the Hourly P&L. There are also a couple of requests under "Punit Rawal" - if you know anything about these, please let me know. Check it out and get let me know what the deal numbers are. Since this is the last week of the month we need to get these fixed asap. If you need help or have questions, please let me know. 09/16 HE 1 & 2 @ 102 MW Oasis #'s 977165 & 977173 HE 23 & 24 @ 204 MW Oasis #'s 977607 & 977641
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: Missing Transmission Deals
Mike & Scott, Sally asked me to forward this to you & wanted to know if there was any way possible you could attend. I apologize for the short notice, but with Sally going out of the country, things have been really hectic. Sheila Glover will also be attending. Please let me know as soon as possible & I will let Paige know. Thanks,
Answer: FAS 133 Offsite
Here is an email: I need a reciprocal confidentiality agreement with: Parson, Brninderhoff, Quade & Douglas One Penn Plaza New York, NY 10119 attn: Mr. Stephen Losi re: potential asset management transaction with Riverbay Corporation relating to Co Op City. One year term. Thanks,
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: CA
Q: Pamela: Please call or email regarding the account assignment. If you are not the right person, please forward the request and advise. We are anxious to have this executed. Thank you for your assistance.
Propose a subject line
A: Transfer and Assignment of Enron North America Corp. ("ENA") accounts to Enron Credit Inc. ("ECI")
IN: Bob: This is something we are working on at Enron. Is this something ISDA has interest in taking a lead on? I think ISDA could add value by developing a standard approach to e-signatures. Mark

Generate a subject line.

OUT: E-Signature Protocol
IN: This is an email
Here's a thought that didn't occur to me when I marked up the mock trial script. Should we have the consultants prominantly feature "IPEC Busters"??? Unless we are pretty sure the judge will keep it out on relevance grounds, it might be useful to at least get some juror reactions to it. With or without the specific IPEC Busters stuff, we probably ought to assume that Jad's theme will be that Northern's whole philosophy was to breach contracts without flinching if it served our commercial interests. The vitriol from P&P and the other producers plays into that theme. Maybe we ought to spice that part of the script up a bit also just so we can see how our response plays. DF

What is the subject?

OUT:
Mock Trial