In this task, you need to write an incorrect answer to the given question. Along with the question, you are also given the correct answer(s) and the associated paragraph. An incorrect answer should be closely related to the content of the paragraph and/or the question but will not truthfully answer the question. Your incorrect answers should be similar to the given correct answer such that it will pose a challenge for students to distinguish the two. A good incorrect answer should prevent those who skip the paragraph from answering the question. The incorrect answer should not be trivial, in the sense that they should not be easily eliminated without reading the paragraph.
--------
Question: Paragraph- Sent 1: In March 2001, Rice asked the CIA to prepare a new series of authorities for covert action in Afghanistan.
Sent 2: Rice's recollection was that the idea had come from Clarke and the NSC senior director for intelligence, Mary McCarthy, and had been linked to the proposal for aid to the Northern Alliance and the Uzbeks.
Sent 3: Rice described the draft document as providing for "consolidation plus," superseding the various Clinton administration documents.
Sent 4: In fact, the CIA drafted two documents.
Sent 5: One was a finding that did concern aid to opponents of the Taliban regime; the other was a draft Memorandum of Notification, which included more open-ended language authorizing possible lethal action in a variety of situations.
Sent 6: Tenet delivered both to Hadley on March 28.
Sent 7: The CIA's notes for Tenet advised him that "in response to the NSC request for drafts that will help the policymakers review their options, each of the documents has been crafted to provide the Agency with the broadest possible discretion permissible under the law."Sent 8: At the meeting, Tenet argued for deciding on a policy before deciding on the legal authorities to implement it.
Sent 9: Hadley accepted this argument, and the draft MON was put on hold.
Sent 10: As the policy review moved forward, the planned covert action program for Afghanistan was included in the draft presidential directive, as part of an "Annex A" on intelligence activities to "eliminate the al Qaeda threat."Sent 11: The main debate during the summer of 2001 concentrated on the one new mechanism for a lethal attack on Bin Laden-an armed version of the Predator drone.
Sent 12: In the first months of the new administration, questions concerning the Predator became more and more a central focus of dispute.
Sent 13: Clarke favored resuming Predator flights over Afghanistan as soon as weather permitted, hoping that they still might provide the elusive "actionable intelligence" to target Bin Laden with cruise missiles.
Sent 14: Learning that the Air Force was thinking of equipping Predators with warheads, Clarke became even more enthusiastic about redeployment.
Sent 15: The CTC chief, Cofer Black, argued against deploying the Predator for reconnaissance purposes.
Sent 16: He recalled that theTaliban had spotted a Predator in the fall of 2000 and scrambled their MiG fighters.
Sent 17: Black wanted to wait until the armed version was ready.
Sent 18: "I do not believe the possible recon value outweighs the risk of possible program termination when the stakes are raised by the Taliban parading a charred Predator in front of CNN," he wrote.
Question: Why did Cofer Black, argue against deploying the Predator for reconnaissance purposes?.

Answer: He believed they were too visible.

Question: Paragraph- Sent 1: Life for the partners of Cates, Katalinic & Lund holds little of the glamour one might expect from a career in law.
Sent 2: Instead of lunches at Lutce, they caucus at the Palace Diner in Queens.
Sent 3: Wooing clients means passing out fliers on street corners, not securing box seats at Madison Square Garden.
Sent 4: To make ends meet, one partner stacks pipe and cleans the yard at a plumbing warehouse.
Sent 5: Another handles urine samples in a hospital lab.
Sent 6: A sign of failure, of a feeble economy, perhaps?
Sent 7: Hardly.
Sent 8: They are heeding the call of a growing pool of law schools, which are for the first time pointing graduates in a new direction and teaching them how to get there.
Sent 9: Forget the lure of large firms, the security of a government post.
Sent 10: Here is how to grapple "in the service of justice," as many of the schools put it, instead.
Sent 11: Convinced that corporate largess and government programs barely dent the nation's legal needs, the law schools are urging graduates to buck tradition, pass up big salaries and ignore mushrooming student debt to join tiny neighborhood practices or simply start their own, all with an eye toward charging no more than their clients can afford.
Sent 12: This is not pro bono legal work; it is "low bono," a term the schools coined to define the atypical kind of law career they are training students for.
Sent 13: While its practitioners do charge for their services, they are also dead set on turning no one away - or at least as few as possible.
Sent 14: "When you go into this kind of social justice law, it's really brutal and you're almost guaranteed to struggle for a couple of years before there's a light at the end of the tunnel," said Fred Rooney, director of the Community Legal Resource Network at City University of New York School of Law, from which the lawyers of the newly formed Cates, Katalinic & Lund graduated last May.
Sent 15: "But if our graduates don't do it, the millions of people who cannot access justice in this country will continue to soar."Sent 16: The movement, primly called the consortium, started four years ago by CUNY, Northeastern University, the University of Maryland and St. Mary's Law School in Texas.
Sent 17: (St. Mary's later dropped out.) Since then, it has drawn seven additional law schools to its ranks: the University of Michigan, Rutgers and Syracuse Law Schools, New York Law School, University of New Mexico School of Law, Thomas M. Cooley Law School and Touro Law School.
Sent 18: It has elicited at least initial interest from 19 more.
Question: Which two places does this article state typical lawyers go?.

Answer: Start own practice.

Question: Paragraph- Sent 1: The Legal Services Corp. (LSC), a quasi-governmental agency that provides legal aid for the poor, would receive $329 million in fiscal 2004 under President Bush's proposal - the same amount requested in 2003 and approved for 2002 and 2001.
Sent 2: If approved, the hold-the-line request for LSC means its budget would erode with inflation for another year, but it could be worse for the organization: Many conservatives fought for years to do away with the LSC altogether, saying legal services attorneys were spending too much time fighting for liberal causes or pursuing politically charged cases against the government instead of representing the needy.
Sent 3: Opposition to the organization has cooled since 1996, when Congress approved restrictions (PL 104-134) on the sorts of cases federally funded legal aid attorneys can take.
Sent 4: (1996 Almanac, p.
Sent 5: 5-36) Republicans cut the organization's budget deeply in 1996, but its funding has recovered slowly.
Sent 6: Last month, in the omnibus spending bill for fiscal 2003, the Senate added a onetime increase of $19 million, which, if approved in the final version, would bring the LSC budget to $348 million.
Sent 7: The money would go to help states, such as Michigan and Ohio, that lost money when the organization redistributed its funding based on census counts made in 2000 of poor households.
Sent 8: If the extra money survives a conference with the House and makes it to the president's desk, LSC supporters may try to include it in the organization's fiscal 2004 funding.
Sent 9: The federal government began funding some programs to provide legal assistance to the poor in the late 1960s; the Legal Services Corporation was created in 1974 (PL 93-355).
Sent 10: LSC gives nearly all its money to state and local agencies, which provide civil legal assistance to those whose income is less than 125 percent of the federal poverty level - $11,075 a year for an individual and $22,625 for a family of four.
Sent 11: Funding for legal services goes to defend needy clients in domestic violence cases, custody cases and other such matters, according to LSC.
Sent 12: Since 1996, lawyers who receive money from Legal Services have been prohibited from such activities as lobbying legislatures, filing class-action suits, participating in political demonstrations or strikes, pursuing abortion-related litigation, representing illegal aliens or prisoners, or defending public housing tenants evicted because they were charged with selling drugs.
Question: List the current budget of the LSC, and the budget with the addition of the onetime increase.

Answer:
300 million.