Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.

Q: I don't want to be exempted from the protections of the ACA.

A: No
****
Q: And of course being so ethical you opted to keep the overage remaining after you bought your three squares a day and loved that TDY because you generally increased your take home three or four hundred a week.

Right?

A: No
****
Q: A critical thinking textbook might categorize this post as an example of sweeping generalization. That aside, I would argue that all fields of knowledge have an ideology, though many strive to render it natural or invisible. Subject matter, epistemology, and ideology join hands to the extent that a branch of knowledge focuses on certain questions, enacts characteristic forms of inquiry and ways of knowing that produce certain kinds of beliefs. For example, a field of knowledge like natural science that many would say is fact not ideology embraces a materialist epistemology that runs counter to a spiritualist or religious epistemology. One sees truth revealed in an objective world from a process of observation and experiment. The other sees truth revealed from a divine source recorded in sacred texts by prophets. Individuals can hold multiple views and work within many knowledge systems. Have you explored your own ideology/worldview? Might explain why you feel antagonized by education.

A:
Yes
****