Q: The Dow Jones report is compiled of data sent from many different counterparties. The lovely people at Dow Jones painstakingly analyze the data to ensure its accuracy. Averaged together, these prices become the Dow Jones daily index price. And that's the long and short of it. The process, as you've guessed by now, is a little more complicated than that. For one thing, Dow Jones looks at each counterparty's sales to reach an average of all the prices. It would be redundant for each counterparty to ALSO report their purchases from each other. Therefore, when calculating the Dow Jones data, we only include purchases from counterparties who ARE NOT participants in the Dow Jones survey. Following is a simple example: Participant List NP-15 Purchases NP-15 Sales Reported NP-15 Purchases Reported NP-15 Sales Sempra Sempra - $250 Sempra - $250 Avista - $270 Sempra - $250 Duke Duke - $260 Duke - $260 Duke - $260 Enron Avista - $270 Avista - $270 Avista - $270 Now that's simple! Following is the participant list for Dow Jones' survey of trading at NP-15 and SP-15 delivery points. Deals with these counterparty names need to be excluded from the calculation of PURCHASES at NP-15 and SP-15 delivery points. American Electric Power - Amerelecpo Avista Energy - Avistaene Duke Energy Trading and Marketing - Dukeenetra El Paso Merchant Energy Enron Power Marketing, Inc. - EPMI Idaho Power Company - Idacorpene PacifiCorp - PACE Pacific Gas & Electric Company - PG&E Powerex Corp. - PWX Puget Sound Energy, Inc. - PSPL Mirant Americas Energy Marketing (formerly Southern Company Energy Marketing) - SCEM TransAlta Energy Marketing (US) Inc. - Transalt So I've probably succeeded in confusing you even more, but please feel free to come bug me with questions. Good luck! Kate
Propose a subject line
A: Dow Jones Report
IN: Dear Gerald: I've received a notice re LRCI, Inc. - Crawfish plant. We're delinquent on our "Form R6" and a penalty has been levied ($250.00). I think this is the sort of regulatory matter that used to be handled by Juanita Marchant, who has moved to AEP. Do you know who is in charge of handling these kinds of filings? Thanks,

Generate a subject line.

OUT: LRCI, Inc. problem
IN: This is an email
Hi Kim: Any luck withJackie re: getting together to start the project? And if there's anything else I can do re: your meeting on Monday, don't hesitate. Leave me a voicemail and let me know how the meeting goes. I'll be in Vancouver with the EBS gang Monday/Tuesday, and if all goes well maybe I can chat up some folks while I'm there. Best,

What is the subject?

OUT: Finance Project
QUESTION: Confidential Work Material - Attorney Client Privilege Attached for review is a draft of the letter to be sent to Wildhorse concerning the Gathering Agreement under which the Entrada and Dakota production is committed. Please review and provide comments. To summarize activities to date concerning this Gathering Agreement: 1. Conducted a conference call with Brett Frie on Wednesday. Brett also forwarded some correspondence between Enogex and Wildhorse. The correspondence contained a summary of meeting minutes for two meetings conducted between Enogex and Wildhorse. No demands were made by Enogex and no claims of unprofitability were made by Wildhorse. Brett stated that the Entrada and to some extent the Dakota gas were shut in or curtailed because the downstream carriers starting enforcing their tighter gas specifications. Enogex took Wildhorse's word for that and never checked with Northwest or Questar. I asked Brett why he thought Wildhorse would straight away release the gas. He responded that he thought they would do so only if Crescendo negotiated an alternative arrangement with Wildhorse. 2. I received more correspondence on Friday from Ken Krisa. Nothing really useful. There was a letter from Wildhorse to another producer in the area called Lone Mountain Production Company which stated that Wildhorse thought these assets were in a state of economic viability decline. Unfortunately this letter was not directed to Enogex. However, the draft letter takes that position with Wildhorse. 3. I am securing local consul out of Denver. I want someone intimately familiar with Utah and Colorado law from a litigation and timing perspective to be involved. We may need to seek a declaratory order. We have run into to conflicts with law firm that have represented either KN or Tom Brown. Should have this resolved on Monday. 4. Agreed to language on Friday with Ken Krisa and Jim Osborne and the declaration by Crescendo giving power to ENA to negotiate with Wildhorse. This draft does state our desire to pursue a release of the gas. However, to reiterate, based on the current facts we do not have a black and white right to deem this gas as released under the Gathering Agreement. The fact that the Entrada Gas is not in spec. with the downstream pipelines for inerts, allows Wildhorse to suspend their receipt of this gas without being in default.
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: Wildhorse Letter
Lines 6, 7, & 8 are sales to CES at the citygate, deals 250126 and 250131. The schedulers wanted 2 deal tickets for tracking purposes. The pricing should be the same. I did make a teeny little error, line 7 should be prices at $3.4228 and line 8 should be priced at $3.4428.
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: CES - manual invoice for May 2000
According to the International Coal desk, the three brokers that have expressed interest are: - TFS - GFI - NatSource Apparently the desk is not as enthusiastic about NatSource from their perspective, though they would be happy to see the other two getting access. Let me know if I can further assist. Thanks,
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer:
Int'l Coal & Broker Client