We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gay Marriage) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gay marriage. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gay marriage.

[EX Q]: I agree that people should have, and they do have, the religious liberty to believe whatever they want and to frown on same-sex marriage if they want to.
[EX A]: Valid

[EX Q]: To bad for you, gay "rights" aren't covered under the constitution...which is probably why you support the "evolving" constitution where you have 5 outta 9 people decide what the consitution should say.
[EX A]: Valid

[EX Q]: But even if it weren't, that point is completely irrelevant because I have presented a perfectly plausible method of maintaining our current definition of the word "marriage" while still granting everyone equal rights.
[EX A]:
Valid