This is the content of an email: Sally has changed the time of her Thursday morning meeting to 8:30 - 10:30 AM (previously scheduled 8:00 - 10:00 AM). Please let me know if you can't make this new time. Topic for meeting: information from her ENA Executive Offsite and also a brainstorming session. Thanks,

Subject: Sally's Thursday morning meeting moved to 8:30 - 10:30 AM

This is the content of an email: market_relations@nyiso.com writes to the NYISO_TECH_EXCHANGE Discussion List: Dear Market Participants On October 17, 2001, the NYISO web servers will be upgraded. This will require both software and hardware changes. While these changes will be transparent to the users, these changes will require that the MIS system be unavailable for approximately 60 minutes. The outage will begin at approximately 11:35 AM. Market Participants planning on submitting HAM transactions or modifying Day Ahead bids should act accordingly. The NYISO will minimize the duration of the outage as much as possible as we recognize the inconvenience caused by system outages. Ultimately, these changes will result in a more stable environment and provide enhanced services that the current web servers are unable to perform.

Subject: NYISO - MIS OUTAGE - October 17, 2001

This is the content of an email: With regard to the Commission's limitations on the right of first refusal, Order 637 provides for grandfathering of discounted long-term contracts that are now subject to ROFR. The Commission's rationale was that grandfathering gives all shippers notice of the new limitation and the opportunity to re-execute current contracts. The TW Commercial Group has asked whether we should challenge the grandfathering of existing contracts. In limiting the right of first refusal, the Commission has expressly acknowledged that if a customer is truly captive and has no alternatives for service, it is likely that its contract will be at the maximum rate. Shippers that are not captive and have alternatives in the marketplace do not need the protection of ROFR, and the pipeline should be able to negotiate with other interested shippers upon expiration of the contract. In light of these conclusions, there should be no reason to grandfather the ROFR rights of shippers under existing discounted contracts. Such shippers would not be harmed by removal of the right immediately upon the effective date of a pipeline's tariff filing to limit the right of first refusal (assuming the service contract incorporates tariff terms on an "as amended" basis). Consistent with the Commission's order, it would not be unfair to make these shippers compete with others for the capacity upon expiration of the contract.

Subject: Order 637: TW Comment on Rehearing Request

This is the content of an email: Bid number 3820 has been awarded to Enron North America Corp. for capacity release parcel 8838. Releasing Shipper: Pacific Gas and Electric Company Path: Kingsgate to Malin Begin Date: 11/1/2001 End Date: 11/30/2001 Amount Awarded: 5387 Bid Amount: 100.0 Price Denomination: Percent Of Max Tariff Rate System Award Message: Non-biddable parcel allocated in full to pre-arranged shipper Bid number 3820 was awarded under new contract number 08110. For additional information, contact our services and contracting department at (503) 833-4300. PG&E National Energy Group and any other company referenced herein that uses the PG&E name or logo are not the same company as Pacific Gas and Electric Company, the regulated California utility. Neither PG&E National Energy Group nor these other referenced companies are regulated by the California Public Utilities Commission. Customers of Pacific Gas and Electric Company do not have to buy products from these companies in order to continue to receive quality regulated services from the utility.
Subject: PG&E eTrans Notification: The following bid has been awarded for parcel 8838.