In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: "Half-sweet, half-decaf vanilla bean latte with soy milk, extra hot, no foam."

I have often wanted to kick this type of person in the balls.

Output: Sexual-explicit

Input: Consider Input: Comment: Trid sees nothing wrong with "No Dogs or Jews", "We don't serve Muslims" and so on. He supports bigotry. And no, that is NOT a straw man, but the clear and obvious implication of your " If either the buyer or the seller does not want to enter into that contract for whatever reason then I believe they have the right to refuse." Thank you for proving that your claim to being a Christian is a complete sham.

Output: Non-sexual-explicit

Input: Consider Input: Comment: Not to be too anal, but you mean VPSO (Village Public Safety Officer), not VSPO. And I believe Wassillie, the victim, was a VPO (Village Police Officer), not a VPSO. There is a big difference. A VPSO goes through state training & is recognized & supervised & paid by the state. There are way more VPOs than VPSOs. VPOs get a lot less training, & none of it is from the state that I know of. VPOs get lower pay, & VPOs are not officially recognized by the state due to the state's opposition to tribal sovereignty. VPOs are paid & supervised by tribal councils. VPOs have high turnover & are often very young guys. VPSOs are meant to be a career option & have longer term professionals, generally. Both jobs are very tough & involve putting yourself in danger without a gun. High stress & low pay. Lots of alcohol-fueled domestic disputes, sometimes relatives.

And to #3, yes the booze came from Bethel, the only hub here. The villages all vote to be dry but BET lets it pour in & profits from it.
Output: Sexual-explicit