Question:
Based on the premise "The Budget and Economic Fiscal Years 2001-2010.", can we conclude that "The budget for 2002-2120"? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
no

Question: Sentence A: Jon turned with the others and left.

Sentence B: Jon also returned to the village.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question: Relief followed.
Relaxation was the outcome.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Problem: Here is a premise:
Richard Lamm, who attempted to wrest leadership of the party away from Perot, is a classic Greater New England progressive, as is former Connecticut Gov.

Here is a hypothesis:
Richard Lamm behaves in way typical of New England liberals.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Sentence 1: because too too often they're can be extremism that that hurts from from any direction regardless of whatever whatever you're arguing or concerned about and

Sentence 2: There is no extremism.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: no

Premise:
"uh i it was important demilitarize demilitarize that area because of all the build up armaments"
Hypothesis: It was important to demilitarize that area.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
yes