In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Example input: Comment: President lied under oath about consensual sex...
Not the same thing as rape.
Example output: Sexual-explicit
Example explanation: This comment explicitly mentions "consensual sex" and "rape", and thus is sexual-explicit.
Q: Comment: You're saying sex is a legitimate appetite that people should be able to act upon, but you connect that action with sexual assault. Example: Prostitution is an act upon the sexual appetite. Legalized prostitution reduces sexual assault, therefore sexual assault is an act on the sexual appetite. So, you think we should encourage one act (prostitution) to discourage another act (sexual assault) on the sexual appetite. Let's apply that idea. You also compared the sexual appetite to other "legitimate appetites," such as hunger. SO. If a person is hungry, then, by your logic, it's also okay for them to steal food. Because if it's okay to visit a prostitute when one is horny, then it's okay to steel food when one is hungry, because what's important here is that we all get to act on our legitimate appetites. Sorry, but I believe it's not unreasonable to expect people to control their sexual urges. It's not okay to commit sexual assault and it's not okay to visit a prostitute.
A:
Sexual-explicit