input: We usually believe what our brain tells us, but there are some amazing facts which show that the brain tricks us. As a result, we think we can see something that is not actually there or we ignore things that actually are there. Scientists Daniel Simons and Christopher Chabris have researched this phenomenon , which they call "change blindness". Their experiments show how we sometimes just do not see what is in front of our eyes because _ . Here is one of their most famous experiments. In this experiment, the participants were shown a video of two groups of people (one group in white T-shirts and one group in black T-shirts) who passed basketballs around in a hallway. Each group had three members. Simons and Chabris asked the participants to count how many times the white team passed the ball. While the two teams were passing their balls around, a person dressed up as a big bear walked through the group and stopped to look at the camera. Simons and Chabris found that about half of the research participants did not notice the big bear. 1. What occupation does Christopher Chabris have?
2. Does he share this occupation with Daniel Simons?
3. Are they chemists?
4. What phenomena do they study?
5. When studying this do they use video?
6. What activity are the people doing in their famous video?
7. Are the people wearing special clothing?
8. What?
9. How many people are in the video?
10. Are all people dressed in Tshirts?
11. What does the bear person do?
12. How many people wear tshirts?
13. How many people wear an animal costume?
14. Does the bear pause at all?
15. When people view this video, what do the scientists try to observe about the viewers?
16. Do all most people notice the bear? Return numbered answers in your output.

output: 1. Scientist
2. yes
3. no
4. change blindness
5. yes
6. passing basketballs
7. yes
8. one group in white T-shirts
9. Seven
10. all but one
11. walked through the group
12. Six
13. One
14. yes
15. to see if they notice the bear
16. half

input: (CNN) -- A jury in Kentucky Friday night acquitted 17-year-old Joshua Young in the beating death of his stepbrother, Trey Zwicker, two years ago.

Young also was found not guilty of tampering with evidence.

Josh Gouker, Young's father, pleaded guilty to murder in Zwicker's death, and was sentenced on July 26 to life in prison. But prosecutors said Young worked with Gouker to beat Zwicker as the teen suffocated in the mud of a ditch behind a Kentucky high school.

"Trey Zwicker was brutally murdered at age 14 ... because Josh Gouker is a control freak and because Josh Young wanted to impress him," prosecutor Elizabeth Brown told the jury in Jefferson County Circuit Court during Friday's closing arguments. She said Gouker was upset with Zwicker's mother after she aborted Gouker's unborn child, and he wanted revenge.

Jurors could have found Young guilty of murder whether they believed he acted alone or with someone else. The tampering with evidence charge accused Young of throwing away clothes and a bloody bat after the murder.

Before deliberations began, Brown told jurors not to feel sorry for the defendant because he's young or because he had a bad father or a bad life.

"You cannot let sympathy add reasonable doubt," Brown said. "He was not coerced into doing this. He bragged about it, laughed about it."

Leslie Smith, delivering the closing argument Friday for the defense, turned the spotlight on Gouker. She called him a "jerk" without a conscience and described him as a master manipulator who killed Zwicker alone. 1. Who was acquitted?
2. How old was he?
3. Why was he acquitted?
4. Why did he get into trouble?
5. When did his dad plead guilty?
6. Did Young work with Gouker?
7. What did they do according to prosecutors?
8. Where did this happen?
9. How old was Zwicker when he died?
10. What was the prosecutor? Return numbered answers in your output.

output: 1. Joshua Young
2. 17
3. Young's father pleaded guilty
4. unknown
5. unknown
6. According to prosecutors
7. Young worked with Gouker to beat Zwicker
8. behind a high school.
9. 14
10. Elizabeth Brown

input: One morning, Daddy, Ethan, and I went out shopping for Mother's day gifts. First we went to buy some flowers. I found a nice big bunch of pink roses that were very pretty. Then we went and bought a card. There were a lot to choose from, some of them had pictures of kids and some of them had pictures of animals. Daddy wanted to get one with a kid hugging his mommy but Ethan wanted the one with a cat on it, and I wanted the one with a dog on it. We ended up getting all three. Then we went to buy ingredients so we could cook breakfast. On Mother's day I helped Daddy make breakfast. We made chocolate pancakes and eggs. It was very messy but a lot of fun. Mommy loved getting breakfast in bed and she liked the flowers and cards. We also went out to go to the park after breakfast. It was a beautiful day and a lot of fun. I can't wait for mother's day to come by again! 1. Who made breakfast?
2. What did they make?
3. How many things did Mommy get?
4. What were they?
5. What kind of flowers?
6. What kind of cards?
7. So how did you decide?
8. Did you go anywhere?
9. Where?
10. How many people went? Return numbered answers in your output.

output:
1. Daddy and I
2. chocolate pancakes and eggs
3. four
4. flowers and cards
5. pink roses
6. a kid hugging his mommy but Ethan wanted the one with a cat on it, and I wanted the one with a dog on it
7. Got all three
8. yes
9. the park
10. five