Q: Ben, We have a draft of the VEPCO "standard" interconnect, which has been internally reviewed by Mitch Robinson and Christi Nicolay. Would you like a copy? Nancy Wodka (Bracewell & Patterson, DC office) is outside counsel working on it as well. We have had no substantive discussions with VEPCO about this agreement at all. Let me know how you want to proceed. Thanks,
Propose a subject line
A: VEPCO Interconnection Agreement
IN: Sally- I made a mistake in saying that we would have the London report ready for your review today. We are not currently keeping a cash collections report on the London cash receipts to the detail that we are here in Houston and, therefore, have not been able to determine the "cash received" percentages for the month of September. However, Pamela Lebrane of Project Sunrise has said that a report containing the required information will be available and easily accessable as a download from SAP by the end of October. As a backup, the London office has agreed to maintain a side spreadsheet for the month of October which will keep track of all invoices due during the month and the timeliness of cash received. Either way, we will make certain to provide an EGM consolidated report for the month of October. I do apologize for the inconvenience. Attached below is a revised version of our Houston report that we had provided on Friday. I noticed that I had included invoices that were due in August as well. A hard copy will be delivered to your office tomorrow. Regards,

Generate a subject line.

OUT: EGM Cash Collections Report
IN: This is an email
Here's an update to yesterday's meeting on this subject. Product Development (Jim Wood, JD Burrows, JeVaughn Sterling, Gillian Johnson and myself) had a brief discussion with Jim Brown (Transaction Accounting) to review the applicability of MTM accounting for the Maryland index product. With relatively minor contract changes (to ensure the product is an "Index Plus" structure) the conclusion of the discussion was that the product should qualify for MTM. Market costs will not necessarily match revenues (for the reasons we discussed yesterday) which should make the product eligible for MTM. The desk would have an index position. The desk can then choose to manage the position or not. Nina and I certainly want to make sure you agree with this reasoning. Here's a 1st draft of a TC with marked revisions. The "Management Fee" is eliminated and replaced with EESI Energy Index Price plus $__/kWh in this draft.

What is the subject?

OUT: Maryland "Index Plus" Product
QUESTION: The information contained herein is based on sources that we believe to be reliable, but we do not represent that it is accurate or complete. Nothing contained herein should be considered as an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any financial instruments discussed herein. Any opinions expressed herein are solely those of the author. As such, they may differ in material respects from those of, or expressed or published by on behalf of Carr Futures or its officers, directors, employees or affiliates. ? 2001 Carr Futures The charts are now in the most recent version of Adobe Acrobat 4.0 and they should print clearly from Adobe Acrobat Reader 3.0 or higher. Adobe Acrobat Reader 4.0 may be downloaded for FREE from www.adobe.com. (See attached file: AGAMAIL.pdf) - AGAMAIL.pdf
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: AGA Report 12/27
Hi Juan, I had another error message today. The box was titled "cmd.exe", and the message was "directory name invalid". My computer is working so far, just thought I would report this for future reference. Have a good day, Kay
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer:
Good morning