IN: This is an email
Steve: I don't believe that I have seen a revised forward confirmation since our conversations in mid-September. I have only a "draft" confirmation dated May , 2000 which I marked and which served as the basis of further discussions. Also, I thought that CSFB was going to send language addressing concerns raised by EITF Issue No. 00-19. FYI, I have not received comments from Mike Enerson. Is someone in your shop preparing a revised confirmation? Thanks. Sara

What is the subject?

OUT: CSFB Int'l/Enron Corp. forward confirmation
QUESTION: It appears that we have now opened up our first Japan based financial product on EnronOnline, and I need to get some direction from you as to what restrictions, if any, we have on (1) counterparties located/incorporated in Japan trading Japan based financial products, and (2) counterparties not located in Japan trading Japan based financial products. Previously, the only Japanese financial product we had was weather, but it wasn't being sold by a Japan based Enron company, so my understanding was that I didn't have any particular restrictions under Japanese law for counterparties located in or outside Japan in trading this product. Now that the product is being sold by a Japan based company I am wondering was restrictions I might have to keep in mind when doing my daily online approvals. The only are Japan based direction I am getting is from the Broadband legal team (Robbi Rossi) which have told me Japanese counterparties can only trade US bandwidth segments. P.S. we do have a Japanese counterparty on the 9/26/00 list.
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: Financial Products in Japan
COLUMBIA GAS TRANSMISSION CORPORATION NOTICE TO ALL INTERESTED PARTIES OCTOBER 29, 2001 Notice ID: 3225 5 - NO RESPONSE REQUIRED SUBJECT: CAPACITY ALLOCATION-TIMELY NOMINATION CYCLE FOR OCTOBER 30, 2001 PLEASE NOTE THAT ALL ALLOCATIONS ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE BASED ON THE RECEIPT OF ANY NEW NOMINATIONS OR INTRADAY NOMINATIONS. RECEIPTS: ALLOCATIONS DUE TO LONG WALL MINING OF LINE SM-123: For the following MLI points: There is no capacity for IPP customers. There is no capacity for ITS customers. There is no capacity for secondary firm customers. There is no capacity for overruns. Equitable Hi Hat MLI F3 KYWV Beaver Creek MLI H1 CNR Boldman MLI CNR02 CNR Conoway MLI CNR03 CNR Johns Creek MLI CNR08 CNR Canada MLI CNR09, CNR10 CNR Stafford MLI CNR11 CNR Thacker/Majestic MLI CNR12 CNR Briar Mtn. MLI CNR13 CNR Huff Creek MLI CNR14 Conoco Grant MLI P1 TENNESSEE: BRINKER: New IPP customers received equal shares of October 30, 2001 available capacity. LEBANON AGGREGATE: There is no capacity for new IPP customers. Flowing IPP customers received 155.686% of their October 29, 2001 flowing volumes or their October 30, 2001 nominated quantities, whichever was less. TCO-LEACH: New IPP customers received 41.591% of their October 30, 3001 nominated quantities. INTERNAL CONSTRAINT: LANHAM: There is no capacity for IPP customers. There is no capacity for ITS customers. There is no capacity for secondary firm customers. Excess MDWQ Available + ISS Withdrawals Available SIT Withdrawals Available Imbalance Drawdowns Available Excess MDIQ Available + ISS Injections Available SIT Injections Available Imbalance Paybacks Available PAL Lends/Unparks Available PAL Parks/Loan Paybacks Available + Call Gas Control 24 hours in advance at (304) 357-2606 to request approval. Columbia Gas Transmission has completed allocating all of its receipt and delivery points for the gas days of October 30, 2001. You may now view the quantities you are authorized to flow on October 30, 2001. On the Internet NAVIGATOR, view Nominations, Scheduled Quantity, Scheduled Quantity for Service Requestor-Summary, Nominations to be Viewed, and select Reduced Nominations. The quantities confirmed to flow for your account are available on the Internet NAVIGATOR after 5:30 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, October 29, 2001. If you have any questions, please contact your Account Representative.
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: TCO- CAPACITY ALLOC-TIMELY NOMINATION CYCLE OCT. 30, 2001
What are our chances of final approval at FERC at the JUly meeting. Jeff still thinks this is a third quarter close. Do we have any chance of making that happen?
Answer: Granite Update
Here is an email: Hi Pete, We want the GE form to be on an individual turbine basis. As for work priorities, I would put it in front of the City of Austin agreement. Thanks,
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: GE contract
QUESTION: The memo attached summarizes a structured deal that the market has shown some interest. Essentially, this deal allows an LDC to defer payment for gas and avoid carrying costs (which may result in a dollar for dollar benefit to your customer's bottom line). We have done two of these deals to date. ENA has interest in additional deals (albeit not an infinite appetite) if the structure allows us to move them off the balance sheet. Please review the memo and target any of your customers that may have an interest. Each deal will require a new quote from credit and from the cost of funds group. Gas structuring is set up to structure these deals and develop them through to execution. Please call me with any questions at x36751
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS:
Structure for Storage Loans / Deferred Payment Deals