Answer the questions at the end based on the text.

CHAPTER THE THIRTY-SIXTH.

But let us now, like soldiers on the watch, Put the soul's armour on, alike prepared For all a soldier's warfare brings. JOANNA BAILLIE.

The reader will recollect, that when Rochecliffe and Joceline were made prisoners, the party which escorted them had two other captives in their train, Colonel Everard, namely, and the Rev. Nehemiah Holdenough. When Cromwell had obtained entrance into Woodstock, and commenced his search after the fugitive Prince, the prisoners were placed in what had been an old guardroom, and which was by its strength well calculated to serve for a prison, and a guard was placed over them by Pearson. No light was allowed, save that of a glimmering fire of charcoal. The prisoners remained separated from each other, Colonel Everard conversing with Nehemiah Holdenough, at a distance from Dr. Rochecliffe, Sir Henry Lee, and Joceline. The party was soon after augmented by Wildrake, who was brought down to the Lodge, and thrust in with so little ceremony, that, his arms being bound, he had very nearly fallen on his nose in the middle of the prison.

"I thank you, my good friend," he said, looking back to the door, which they who had pushed him in were securing--"_Point de ceremonie_--no apology for tumbling, so we light in good company.--Save ye, save ye, gentlemen all--What, _a la mort_, and nothing stirring to keep the spirits up, and make a night on't?--the last we shall have, I take it; for a make [Footnote: A half-penny] to a million, but we trine to the nubbing cheat [Footnote: Hang on the gallows] to-morrow.--Patron--noble patron, how goes it? This was but a scurvy trick of Noll so far as you were concerned: as for me, why I might have deserved something of the kind at his hand."

1. Who became prisoners?
2. Were there others?
3. Who were they?
4. Where did Cromwell gain entrance to?
5. Was he looking for someone?
6. Who?
7. Where did they put the prisoners?
8. Was that a good place to put them?
9. Did someone watch over them?
10. Who assigned them to do so?
11. Were the prisoners huddled together?
12. Who did Colonel Everand speak with?
13. Who else was brought there?
14. How were his arms positioned?
15. What did he almost fall on?
16. Where?

Numbered answers:

A: 1. Rochecliffe and Joceline
2. yes
3. Colonel Everard and the Rev
4. Woodstock
5. yes
6. the fugitive Prince
7. an old guardroom,
8. yes
9. yes
10. Pearson
11. no
12. Nehemiah Holdenough
13. Wildrake
14. they were bound
15. his nose
16. in the middle of the prison.

Question: (CNN) -- Jurors did not reach a verdict in their first day of deliberations Monday in the trial of Steven Hayes, the man accused of killing three members of a Connecticut family in a 2007 home invasion.

They are expected to resume their work Tuesday morning.

Hayes, 47, who has pleaded not guilty, is on trial in New Haven, Connecticut, for the murders of Jennifer Hawke-Petit and her two daughters.

The killings took place in the New Haven suburb of Cheshire early July 23, 2007. The home of William Petit, his wife, Hawke-Petit, and two daughters was invaded in the middle of the night by Hayes and co-defendant Joshua Komisarjevsky, prosecutors say.

Komisarjevsky will be tried separately.

Judge Jon Blue gave instructions Monday morning and told the jury: "You are the sole judges of the facts."

"We're in the home stretch," the judge said after going over all 17 counts with the jury. "No one will hurry you to produce a verdict."

Their first duty will be to pick a foreman, and their verdict must be unanimous, the judge reminded the jurors.

Soon after starting their deliberations, the jurors asked for a transcript of an interview by a state police detective, who spoke to Hayes soon after his arrest. The judge offered to have the testimony read back -- which the jurors declined.

Later in the day, they sent a note to the judge asking for a definition of what constitutes starting a fire.Their deliberations Monday ran just over 2 hours. 1. Who is on trial?
2. How many is he accused of killing?
3. On what date?
4. What month of that year?
5. How old is he?
6. Did he have an accomplice?
7. Who?
8. Is he also facing trial?
9. Together with Hayes, or seperately?
10. Where did the killings take place?
11. What city is it a suburb of?
12. At whose home?
13. How many counts is Hayes facing?
14. Did he plead guilty?
15. What day of deliberations just finished?
16. On what day of the week?
17. Was a decision made?
18. How long was their deliberation?
19. What information did they request?
20. What does the jury need to decide on, first? Provide a numbered list of answers.
****
A numbered of answers: 1. Hayes
2. three
3. 2007
4. July
5. 47
6. yes
7. Joshua Komisarjevsky
8. yes
9. separately
10. Cheshire
11. New Haven
12. William Petit
13. 17
14. no
15. their first
16. Monday
17. no
18. just over 2 hours
19. what constitutes starting a fire
20. a foreman

Q: CHAPTER TWENTY FIVE.

A GREAT FIELD-DAY, IN WHICH SLAGG DISTINGUISHES HIMSELF.

Now, although we have said that Jim Slagg knew how to pull a trigger, it does not follow that he knew how to avoid pulling that important little piece of metal. He was aware, of course, that the keeping of his forefinger off the trigger was a point of importance, but how to keep it off when in a state of nervous expectation, he knew not, because his memory and the forefinger of his right hand appeared to get disconnected at such times, and it did not occur to him, just at first, that there was such an arrangement in gun-locks as half-cock.

Flinn reminded him of the fact, however, when, soon after entering the jungle, his straw hat was blown off his head by an accidental discharge of Slagg's gun.

"Niver mention it," said Flinn, picking up his riven headpiece, while poor Slagg overwhelmed him with protestations and apologies, and the black boy stood behind exposing his teeth, and gums and the whites of his eyes freely; "niver mention it, Mr Slagg; accidents _will_ happen, you know, in the best regulated families. As for me beaver, it's better riddled than whole in this warm weather. Maybe you'd as well carry your gun at what sodgers call 'the showlder,' wid the muzzle pintin' at the moon--so; that's it. Don't blame yoursilf, Mr Slagg. Sure, it's worse than that I was when I begood, for the nasty thing I carried wint off somehow of its own accord, an' I shot me mother's finest pig--wan barrel into the tail, an' the other into the hid. You see, they both wint off a'most at the same moment. We must learn by exparience, av coorse. You've not had much shootin' yet, I suppose?"

1. A hat
2. Flinn's
3. Straw
4. Slagg
5. Jim
6. No
7. Yes
8. He was nervous
9. Yes
10. Yes

Numbered questions:
1. What was damaged by an accidental gunshot?
2. Whose?
3. What was it made of?
4. Who shot it?
5. What's his first name?
6. Was discharging his weapon inadvertently a new problem for him?
7. Was he aware he shouldn't keep his finger on the trigger?
8. Why did he?
9. Did he feel bad about the incident?
10. Was he forgiven by his victim?