Teacher: In this task, you are given an abstract of article. Your task is to generate label "True" if abstract is structured, otherwise generate "False". A structured abstract is composed of a topic sentence (or key sentence), relevant supporting sentences, and a closing (or transition) sentence. This structure is key to keeping your abstract focused on the main idea and creating a clear and concise image.
Teacher: Now, understand the problem? If you are still confused, see the following example:
RanBP type proteins have been reported to increase the catalytic efficiency of the RanGAP-mediated GTPase reaction on Ran. Since the structure of the Ran-RanBP1-RanGAP complex showed RanBP1 to be located away from the active site, we reinvestigated the reaction using fluorescence spectroscopy under pre-steady-state conditions. We can show that RanBP1 indeed does not influence the rate-limiting step of the reaction, which is the cleavage of GTP and/or the release of product P(i). It does, however, influence the dynamics of the Ran-RanGAP interaction, its most dramatic effect being the 20-fold stimulation of the already very fast association reaction such that it is under diffusion control (4.5 x 10(8) M(-1) s(-1)). Having established a valuable kinetic system for the interaction analysis, we also found, in contrast to previous findings, that the highly conserved acidic C-terminal end of RanGAP is not required for the switch-off reaction. Rather, genetic experiments in Saccharomyces cerevisiae demonstrate a profound effect of the acidic tail on microtubule organization during mitosis. We propose that the acidic tail of RanGAP is required for a process during mitosis.
Solution: False
Reason: Output is appropriate for the given abstract because it is not structured.

Now, solve this instance: Gene-encoded antimicrobial peptides that protect the skin of hylid and ranin frogs against noxious microorganisms are processed from a unique family of precursor polypeptides with a unique pattern of conserved and variable regions opposite to that of conventional secreted peptides. Precursors belonging to this family, designated the preprodermaseptin, have a common N-terminal preproregion that is remarkably well conserved both within and between species, but a hypervariable C-terminal domain corresponding to antimicrobial peptides with very different lengths, sequences, charges and antimicrobial spectra. Each frog species has its own distinct panoply of 10-20 antimicrobial peptides so that the 5000 species of ranids and hylids may produce approximately 100,000 different peptide antibiotics. The strategy that these frogs have evolved to generate this enormous array of peptides includes repeated duplications of a 150 million years old ancestral gene, focal hypermutation of the antimicrobial peptide domain maybe involving a mutagenic DNA polymerase similar to Escherichia coli Pol V, and subsequent actions of positive (diversifying) selection. The hyperdivergence of skin antimicrobial peptides can be viewed as the successful evolution of a multi-drug defense system that provides frogs with maximum protection against rapidly changing microbial biota and minimizes the chance of microorganisms developing resistance to individual peptides. The impressive variations in the expression of frog skin antimicrobial peptides may be exploited for discovering new molecules and structural motifs targeting specific microorganisms for which the therapeutic armamentarium is scarce.
Student:
False