Instructions: Given a paragraph about movies and a set of conversational questions and answers about the paragraph, say whether the passage contains sufficient information to answer the follow-up question. Say Yes if it is answerable; otherwise, say No. The paragraph has the prefix 'CONTEXT:'. Each conversation question has a prefix 'Q:' followed by the answer prefix 'A:', and the follow-up question has a prefix 'FOLLOWUP_Q:'.
Input: CONTEXT: My theory is yes, it is so easy to become vice president of Dunder Mifflin. That's most likely why they were bought out by Sabre, its because all of the guys in the New York branch were all idiots and had no clue what they were doing and didn't care, most likely because its a paper company, and who cares about paper!? <sep> Q: Was it that easy to become a vice President at Dunder Mifflin? A: My theory is yes Q: What is that theory based on? A: ts because all of the guys in the New York branch were all idiots and had no clue what they were doing and didn't car Q: How can Ryan from The Office take over a senior position without any experience? A: because its a paper company, and who cares about paper <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: What else can you tell me about The Office?
Output:
Yes