In this task, you are given a passage which has a question and the context. You have to generate an answer to the question based on the information present in the context.

[EX Q]: Context: Tetrahydrocurcumin (THC) is an active metabolite of curcumin. It has been reported to have similar pharmacological activity to curcumin. The proteases that participate in extracellular matrix (ECM) degradation are involved in cancer cell metastasis. The present study investigates the effect of an ultimate metabolite of curcumin, THC, on the invasion and motility of highly-metastatic HT1080 human fibrosarcoma cells.', 'The effect of THC on HT1080 cell invasion and migration was determined using Boyden chamber assay. Cell-adhesion assay was used for examining the binding of cells to ECM molecules. Zymography assay was used to analyze the effect of THC on matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-2, MMP-9, and urokinase plasminogen activator (uPA) secretion from HT1080 cells. Tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase (TIMP)-2 and membrane-type 1 matrix metalloproteinase (MT1-MMP) proteins levels were analyzed by Western blotting.', 'Treatment with THC reduced HT1080 cell invasion and migration in a dose-dependent manner. THC also decreased the cell adhesion to Matrigel and laminin-coated plates. Analysis by zymography demonstrated that treatment with THC reduced the levels of MMP-2, MMP-9, and uPA. THC also inhibited the levels of MT1-MMP and TIMP-2 proteins detected by Western blot analysis.\Question: Does tetrahydrocurcumin inhibit HT1080 cell migration and invasion via downregulation of MMPs and uPA?
[EX A]: Our findings revealed that THC reduced HT1080 cell invasion and migration. The inhibition of cancer cell invasion is associated with the downregulation of ECM degradation enzymes and the inhibition of cell adhesion to ECM proteins.

[EX Q]: Context: . We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a multifaceted intervention, targeting staff-patient communication, in improving emergency department patient satisfaction.', 'We undertook a pre- and post-intervention study in a university-affiliated emergency department, over a 12-month period. The intervention included communication workshops, a patient education film, and a patient liaison nurse. At the patient level, the patient liaison nurse ensured optimal staff-patient community communication and played a role in staff communication education. The intervention was evaluated using patient surveys (containing general and communication-specific satisfaction items scored out of 100), complaint rates, and patient liaison nurse activity data.', "A total of 321 and 545 patients returned questionnaires in the pre- and post-intervention periods, respectively. Significant improvements were observed in patients' perceptions of being 'informed about delays' [score difference, 5.3; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.6-10.0], that 'staff cared about them as a person' (difference, 4.4; 95% CI, 0.7-8.1), the overall emergency department facility assessment (difference, 3.9; 95% CI, 0.4-7.5) and overall emergency department care (difference, 3.8; 95% CI, 0.3-7.3). Non-significant improvements were seen in all other satisfaction items. In the post-intervention period, there was a 22.5% (95% CI, 14.6-32.8) decrease in the number of complaints received and a decrease in the complaint rate of 0.7 (95% CI, -0.3 to 1.6) complaints per 1000 patients. The patient liaison nurse activities included orientation of the patient including (i) explanation of tests, procedures, and delays; (ii) communication with a range of hospital staff; and (iii) general comfort measures including analgesia quality control.\Question: Does a multifaceted intervention improve patient satisfaction and perceptions of emergency department care?
[EX A]: Significant improvements in a variety of patient satisfaction measures were achieved with an intervention comprising staff communication workshops, a patient education film, and a patient liaison nurse.

[EX Q]: Context: Recent changes in the NHS have led to a considerably increased workload for histopathologists prompting the publication of guidelines from the Royal College of Pathologists regarding specimen analysis. In most hospitals, cholecystectomy specimens are routinely sent for histology regardless of whether or not there is any visible macroscopic abnormality suggestive of malignancy. Our aim was to assess whether it would be safe to adopt a policy of processing only suspicious gallbladders without compromising patient management and outcome.', 'A retrospective analysis of all cholecystectomies performed between 1995 and 1999 was conducted using computerised histopathology records and patient notes. The histopathology department has a standardised procedure for the evaluation of cholecystectomy specimens and all gallbladders had been processed in this manner.', '1308 patients had undergone cholecystectomy (mean 262/year). All specimens had been sent for histology: 1249 of the specimens showed chronic cholecystitis, 38 acute cholecystitis or empyema and 16 were removed as part of another procedure. In five gallbladders there was evidence of primary carcinoma. In all cases the gallbladder was opened at the time of surgery (as commented upon in the operation notes) and all showed macroscopic evidence suggestive of carcinoma. Pre-operative ultrasound scanning identified probable carcinoma in three of the five cases.\Question: Is a selective approach to histopathology of the gallbladder justifiable?
[EX A]:
All cases of gallbladder carcinoma were diagnosed pre-operatively or intra-operatively and a histological diagnosis did not alter the management or outcome of any of these patients. Selective histopathology of the gallbladder is safe and may be a more measured approach saving histolopathology departments time and money.