Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.

Example input: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Example output: Yes
Example explanation: The comment suggests threat against Trump and his agendas and classified as threatening. Hence, it is a positive example
Q: Stop the big oil monopoly and open Alaska to Alaskans and other small competitors!
Once the monopoly and rigged oil and gas system is gone then take away all credits and incentives because TAPS will be filled with oil and PFD checks will be 10 times what they are now!
Alaska oil workers should not be laid off work, this rigged system can be fixed!
Wake up!
Thank our Alaskan oil workers, they helped give Alaska's Government royalty income on 19 Billion Barrels of oil and 8 Trillion Cubic Feet at no cost !
These credits could get Alaskans another Prudhoe Bay Kuparuk so Alaskans can enjoy another 40 years of free oil money!
The cost of 1% of what the oil producers gave Alaskans in royalty, the last 40 years pays for credits & incentives!
HB 247 takes money producers gave and is the least you can do to help find Alaska's next Prudhoe!
HB 247 is Hell Bent on running oil investors out of Alaska 24/7 and you will have to live off the PFD for 5 years then find more free money somehow!
A:
No