Given a paragraph about movies and a set of conversational questions and answers about the paragraph, say whether the passage contains sufficient information to answer the follow-up question. Say Yes if it is answerable; otherwise, say No. The paragraph has the prefix 'CONTEXT:'. Each conversation question has a prefix 'Q:' followed by the answer prefix 'A:', and the follow-up question has a prefix 'FOLLOWUP_Q:'.

[Q]: CONTEXT: This is just what I gathered from both the book and film. It's likely that the group was being watched by the others. If they'd left anything behind it would arouse their suspicion and risk failure. Being the larger and more dangerous group it would be more secure for them to be seen to move as a group rather than leave people behind. <sep> Q: Why didn't they leave one end of the wire at the beach? A: It's likely that the group was being watched by the others. If they'd left anything behind it would arouse their suspicion and risk failure <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Was there anyone else who could pair with Katniss? Seems silly to send her alone.
[A]: Yes

[Q]: CONTEXT: Many reviews are calling this a black comedy or dark comedy, which is comedy that makes light of a serious subject or a comedy with gloomy or disturbing elements. If this film was just a drama, it would be a serious depiction of four girls going on spring break and the tragedy that unfolded when they got mixed up with a gangster. Instead, there are pink ski masks, bikinis in court, lots of sex, references to Britney Spears, the mere existence of a drug dealer named Alien who shows up to bail the girls out of jail... The basic premise is ridiculous, and the way that violence is interspersed with this ridiculousness sets up an uncomfortable edge that seems to keep audiences talking about this movie. Mostly the characters are flat and the story is not that gripping, but the edge that Harmony Korinne keeps the audience on - never knowing which direction it would go - seems to keep viewers engaged, whether they are engrossed or repelled. <sep> Q: How exactly is the movie a comedy? A: reviews are calling this a black comedy or dark comedy Q: What is a dark comedy? A: comedy that makes light of a serious subject or a comedy with gloomy or disturbing elements Q: Is the movie supposed to be funny? A: Many reviews are calling this a black comedy or dark comedy <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: What is the movie classified as?
[A]: Yes

[Q]: CONTEXT: For the same reason that Jeff doesn't immediately call the police with his suspicions: fear that if Thorwald realizes he has been made by an outside observer, he will dispose of all the evidence and escape without prosecution... Lisa is buying more time by being taken under arrest, and the event was intended to appease Thorwald to some extent. He was already making mistakes (retaining his wife's wedding ring due to sentimentality), and Lisa was clinging onto the thought that their plan was not yet foiled. The arrest itself was actually a means of getting Lisa safely out of the apartment, and of getting the wedding ring (as evidence) into the hands of the police. <sep> Q: Why didn't Lisa tell the truth about Thorwald to the police? A: For the same reason that Jeff doesn't immediately call the police with his suspicions Q: Why does she get herself arrested? A: Lisa is buying more time by being taken under arrest <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Did Thornwald run away?
[A]:
No