Answer the questions at the end based on the text.

CHAPTER XXIX. "BONY."

Mrs. Ellmother reluctantly entered the room.

Since Emily had seen her last, her personal appearance doubly justified the nickname by which her late mistress had distinguished her. The old servant was worn and wasted; her gown hung loose on her angular body; the big bones of her face stood out, more prominently than ever. She took Emily's offered hand doubtingly. "I hope I see you well, miss," she said--with hardly a vestige left of her former firmness of voice and manner.

"I am afraid you have been suffering from illness," Emily answered gently.

"It's the life I'm leading that wears me down; I want work and change."

Making that reply, she looked round, and discovered Francine observing her with undisguised curiosity. "You have got company with you," she said to Emily. "I had better go away, and come back another time."

Francine stopped her before she could open the door. "You mustn't go away; I wish to speak to you."

"About what, miss?"

The eyes of the two women met--one, near the end of her life, concealing under a rugged surface a nature sensitively affectionate and incorruptibly true: the other, young in years, with out the virtues of youth, hard in manner and hard at heart. In silence on either side, they stood face to face; strangers brought together by the force of circumstances, working inexorably toward their hidden end.

Emily introduced Mrs. Ellmother to Francine. "It may be worth your while," she hinted, "to hear what this young lady has to say."

1. Had Emily seen Mrs. Ellmother recently?
2. Did she look well?
3. Was anyone with her?
4. How were clothes?
5. what stood out?
6. What did Emily say she was afraid had happened to her?
7. how did she reply?
8. and what did she want?
9. were the women the same age?
10. Who was introduced to Francine?
11. by who?
12. was Francine old?
13. Did Mrs Ellmother enter the room swiftly?
14. how then?
15. did she have a nickname?
16. who gave it to her?
17. how did she take Emily's hand?
18. did she sound the same asalways?
19. how then?
20. and?

Numbered answers:

A: 1. no
2. no
3. yes
4. loose
5. the big bones of her face
6. suffering from illness,
7. It's the life I'm leading that wears me down
8. want work and change
9. no
10. Mrs. Ellmother
11. Emily
12. no
13. no
14. reluctantly
15. who gave it to her?
16. her late mistress
17. doubtingly.
18. no
19. with hardly a vestige left of her former firmness of voice
20. manner.

Answer the questions at the end based on the text.

CHAPTER XVIII

ROCHESTER'S ULTIMATUM

The Park into which they turned was almost deserted. Pauline stopped the carriage and got out.

"Come and walk with me a little way," she said to Rochester. "We will go and sit amongst that wilderness of empty chairs. I want to talk. I must talk to someone. We shall be quite alone there."

Rochester walked by her side, puzzled. He had never seen her like this.

"I suppose I am hysterical," she said, clutching at his arm for a moment as they passed along the walk. "There, even that does me good. It's good to feel--oh, I don't know what I'm talking about!" she exclaimed.

"Where have you been this afternoon?" he asked gravely.

"To hear that awful man Naudheim," she answered. "Henry, I wish I'd never been. I wish to Heaven you'd never asked Bertrand Saton to Beauleys."

Rochester's face grew darker.

"I wish I'd wrung the fellow's neck the first day I saw him," he declared, bitterly. "But after all, Pauline, you don't take this sort of person seriously?"

"I wish I didn't," she answered.

"He's an infernal charlatan," Rochester declared. "I'm convinced of it, and I mean to expose him."

She shook her head.

"You can call him what you like," she said, "but there is Naudheim behind him. There is no one in Europe who would dare to call Naudheim a charlatan."

"He is a wonderful man, but he is mad," Rochester said.

"No, he is not mad," she said. "It is we who are mad, to listen a little, to think a little, to play a little with the thoughts he gives us."

1. Who was beside someone
2. where did they go?
3. was something stopped?
4. what?
5. did rochesters face change?

Numbered answers:

A: 1. Rochester
2. Amongst that wilderness of empty chairs.
3. Yes
4. The carriage
5. unknown

Answer the questions at the end based on the text.

The term dialect (from Latin dialectus, dialectos, from the ancient Greek word dialektos, "discourse", from dia, "through" and lego, "I speak") is used in two distinct ways to refer to two different types of linguistic phenomena.

One usagethe more common among linguistsrefers to a variety of a language that is a characteristic of a particular group of the language's speakers. The term is applied most often to regional speech patterns, but a dialect may also be defined by other factors, such as social class. A dialect that is associated with a particular social class can be termed a sociolect, a dialect that is associated with a particular ethnic group can be termed as ethnolect, and a regional dialect may be termed a regiolect. According to this definition, any variety of a language constitutes "a dialect", including any standard varieties.

The other usage refers to a language that is socially subordinated to a regional or national standard language, often historically cognate or related to the standard language, but not actually derived from it. In this sense, unlike in the first usage, the standard language would not itself be considered a "dialect," as it is the dominant language in a particular state or region, whether in terms of social or political status, official status, predominance or prevalence, or all of the above. Meanwhile, the "dialects" subordinate to the standard language are generally not variations on the standard language but rather separate (but often related) languages in and of themselves. For example, most of the various regional Romance languages of Italy, often colloquially referred to as Italian "dialects," are, in fact, not actually derived from modern standard Italian, but rather evolved from Vulgar Latin separately and individually from one another and independently of standard Italian, long prior to the diffusion of a national standardized language throughout what is now Italy. These various Latin-derived regional languages are therefore, in a linguistic sense, not truly "dialects" of the standard Italian language, but are instead better defined as their own separate languages. Conversely, with the spread of standard Italian throughout Italy in the 20th century, various regional versions or varieties of standard Italian developed, generally as a mix of the national standard Italian with local regional languages and local accents. These variations on standard Italian, known as regional Italian, would more appropriately be called "dialects" in accordance with the first linguistic definition of "dialect," as they are in fact derived partially or mostly from standard Italian.

1. How many ways is the term dialect used?
2. What is a dialect related to a class?
3. What about a regional dialect?
4. What about a dialect related to a certain ethnicity?
5. How many types of linguistic phenomena?
6. What is the standard language not considered in the other usage?
7. Where are the regional Italian dialects actually derived from?
8. What caused the development of regional versions or varieties of standard Italian?
9. What are variations on standard Italian known as?
10. What is the origin of the term dialect?

Numbered answers:

A:
1. in two ways
2. a sociolect
3. a regiolect.
4. as ethnolect
5. two ways
6. unknown
7. from Vulgar Latin
8. a mix of national and local
9. they are known as regional Italian
10. from the Greek word for "discourse"