input question: Those with a passion for the big city can combine Rome with the artistic delights of Florence and Tuscany, or Milan with the magical romance of Venice. If this premise is true, does that tell us:"People who like big cities shouldn't bother visiting Tuscany, since it has more of a small-town feel."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: no

Question:
Based on the premise "They ducked behind a large rock as a dozen more riders roared past silhouetted against the blazing village.", can we conclude that "It was behind a big rock that they hid as the riders rode past. "? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
yes

Question: Sentence A: Indiana is studying document assembly software, and Illinois is studying the combination of audio-video conferencing with document assembly.

Sentence B: Illinois and Indiana are not studying document assembly.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question: Ware's group has developed the mental-health segment first.
Ware's group was the first to develop the mental-health segment, said the research.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Problem: Here is a premise:
As a matter of fact, instead of focusing on polling's farcical contributions to an enlightened society, he conveys the notion that polling is/would be credible without the manipulations (subtle or otherwise).

Here is a hypothesis:
He implies that the polling's credibility would be better if there were no manipulations.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Question:
They knew enough of you both for that.

Does it follow that "They knew the things you've done with each other."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
it is not possible to tell