IN: This is an email
COLUMBIA GULF TRANSMISSION COMPANY NOTICE TO ALL INTERESTED PARTIES OCTOBER 17, 2001 Notice ID: 3187 5 - NO RESPONSE REQUIRED Columbia Gulf Transmission is auctioning 10,250 dth/d of available firm capacity on the mainline. This capacity is from Rayne, Louisiana to Leach, Kentucky at CGT's maximum FTS-1 transportation rate. This capacity will be available starting November 1, 2001, with a maximum term of 20 years and a minimum term of two years. Bids must be received by 9:00 a.m. (Central Time) October 24, 2001. Details of this capacity auction may be found in the Columbia NAVIGATOR system, under the capacity release folder, offers icon, offer summary, offer type, capacity auction, offer number 33801.

What is the subject?

OUT: CGT - FTS-1 Capacity Auction
QUESTION: I have accepted a position with AEP's Portland office, effective today. I do not have contact information at AEP yet, but if you wish to contact me you may do so by email at taperry1@attbi.com. It has been a pleasure working with all of you over the past year and three quarters. I wish you the best of luck in the future.
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: Farewell
Brent Price and I will be in the London office next week, arriving Monday morning and returning to Houston on Friday. The purpose of my visit is in regard to my Global Risk Management Operations role, I believe that Rick Causey met with you regarding some operations support that Brent and I will provide to Fernley during a transition period prior to the arrival and during the assimilation of Michael Jordan, the JP Morgan staffer that Fernley has hired. Brent and I will be working with Fernley next week to iron out the details of our support for Fernley during that transition period. We will also map out an Enron trading operations introduction for Michael Jordan, which may involve a short stint for him in Houston. My goal is to provide a strong resource to Fernley during this transition period and to work with Fernley to provide whatever assistance, training, and orientation to Michael in his role so that his assimilation can be as smooth and effective as possible. Another purpose for the trip is to spend some time with Fernley and his business controllers to get their ideas on specific goals that as a group we would commit to for 2000. I know that Barry and Richard Sage have many good ideas on how we can leverage knowledge and best practices across all Enron locations with trading operations. My earlier trips to London this year were focused solely on Helsinki, and did not allow time to positively focus on leveraging worldwide operations experience. I value input from other trading operations professionals and I look forward to the ideas that can be generated in working with Barry, Richard and some of their direct reports. I also contacted Tani Nath about my trip to see how I could support her as she moves into her role in Global Products. I have not heard from Tani, but I understand from others that she will be in the Houston office next week. It will be unfortunate to miss her on my trip, but based on my commitments in Houston and Rick Causey's desire to move forward on providing trading operations support to Fernley, next week is the best for me to be in London. I did meet with Tani for an hour when she was here week before last and offered to help her in any way if she made the decision to accept the role over Global Products. I trust that she will contact me for that support as needed. I have scheduled a short meeting one on one with you while I am there to discuss how my global role can provide support and resources for your business efforts in London. I look forward to meeting with you next week. This trip is not a leg of the worldwide operations/control review that we are conducting at Joe Sutton's request. By circumstance, as you know, we have taken a look at Helsinki and subsequently Oslo and Frankfurt. There will be a similar review of Continental power, UK gas, UK power and global liquids. The review teams are currently focused on operations/controls reviews of North American locations and some entities in the US in which Enron has a large ownership position. It is likely that the continuation of this effort in London will occur in mid April. Copies of the drafts of the findings for Oslo and Frankfurt were provided to Fernley as soon as the team returned to Houston. We hope to finalise those drafts this week as we receive comments from Fernley and the business managers in Oslo and Frankfurt to whom those drafts were provided. Fernley suggested that you would like to see the drafts as opposed to the final copies, so I will have those forwarded to you today. The Sydney and Singapore trip was a lengthy one, as it also involved a last leg of the trip in London with regard to support for SIngapore. The Houston team returned the middle of last week and worked with AA on an early draft last Friday. I can also provide you with a draft of that report, the completion of which was pending input from Bill Bradford early this week (he made the trip but was out of the office last week). We did do a preliminary review of the Sydney and Singapore findings with Rick Causey and Rick Buy on Friday afternoon, to accommodate the fact that both are out on vacation this week. They understood the preliminary nature of the draft that was reviewed with them.
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: Trip to London Next Week
Lynn, any update yet from Gary or Caroline as to the updates you requested in your December 11 email? I am finalizing a letter to Alliant and would like to provide them with an expectation as to the October PPA's. Specifically, will all the October charts be corrected? Further, Alliant wants Gas Logistics to tag the PPA's. Specifically, Alliant requested the differences are identified by gate and amount of change. Is this possible?
Answer: October (Forward) Positive Displacement Meter PPA Status
QUESTION: Group, Our deal with EES has changed. As Ryan indicated in his email we are now charging $3 for EES up to 100 mws, above 100 mws to 200 mws we are charging $4, above 200 mws per hour we are charging $5. However, when we have transacted with EES for a peaker product or day-ahead schedule we will not integrate our fee into their price for that quanity of mws. I will indicate in an email to you when this occurs. This is a bit complex but if you have questions just let me know. Also, EnMax has recently been buying energy from us at the BC Border. This turned out to be a "Canadian" firm purchase on the part of Enmax. Please do not fill any sale to EnMax with MPC energy. We need to treat EnMax just like ECC. We should buy an option or a call and then exercise that option. MPC does not have this capability and should not be used in this manner. Finally, the NW evening peak has arrived. The NW has been extremely tight through morning and evening peaks, often over $30 to pick up... Any questions, just let me know. Thanks,
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS:
Changing Deals and Counterparties--