While you were out, it was a bit crazed as you expected. I'll hit some highlights for you: Botchlett and Straub position statements: went out on Wednesday. Chapman: I sent the Ok. lawyer a letter and hired Lyn Mattson to investigate. Roome: Spoke with Trey (we had a case against each other a while back and get along well) and sent him a letter. Left Haedicke a message asking if we should give anyone in particular a head's up that they mentioned the SEC investigation. He says don't need to pass along. Anthony Sexton: Got out that separation agreement. Ken Rice: Sent Mark Haedicke a memo outlining the non-competition obligations and potential issues. CC'd you on it. Kitchen/Nettleton: Further discussions with T&F, Oxley, Marcus, Tim Callaghan, etc. Sounds like Marcus is happy. We're getting packet for consular process out to T&F, they send to London, and we think that with some luck (depending on FBI delay on background check), January or February may hold their interviews. Marcus decided not to switch to J&G. RIF: I helped out on some connected stuff, including helping Kerry with release language and speaking with counsel in Mexico so HR can determine what needs to go into calculations for analysis of shutdown of all Mexico ops. Internet Use: Prepared a memo for Oxley. He hasn't responded about whether he wishes to use it. He walked someone out the door (without talking to legal) for posting on the internet from work. New Hire: I did what Vance says was the final new hire orientation. :( We'll talk on your return about figuring out how to tell new hires what they need to know. Hope you had a good trip and a happy Thanksgiving!
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: various updates
The phone call to Intermesa and Votorantim should emphasize the following points: 1. The transaction was never consumated. We have consistently stated that we do not consider the transaction a "done deal" until final documents are executed. 2. We are no longer willing to consider the proposed transaction. The reason is simple: the market has moved and they failed to act quickly. 3. All markets,pet coke markets in particular, are time sensitive. Because Votorantim has delayed in the execution of final documents, it accepted the risk that, over time, market prices would change and Enron would no longer be willing to sign a deal. 4. Again, we never had a final, enforceable deal. Their only claim is that we misrepresented to them our willingness to do the deal and therefor they didn't pursue negotiations with a third party. Our response is: we never made any misrepresetation and it is not reasonable to rely on our negotiations as a basis to forego discussions with third parties when Enron never sent them a binding offer.
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: Intermesa/Votorantim
I saved the file for us to send to Susan Trevino for all the book access requests. I added the control group and put goss, kam, valdes and his people in there. So make sure you add that group to your book requests. Please take a look at this file and let me know if we need to make any changes. I plan on sending this file to Susan Trevino by tomorrow afternoon. The file in located in the Netco directory under controls/desk matrix. Thanks. PL
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: risk matrix
Hey Gang, Attached are the physical curve mappings as provided by Russ Severson... Please take a peek and let us know if we need to change, add/delete, update any points/mappings going forward in a Netco environment... For instance, I would like to change Texoma to Carthage on the curve mappings... Also, I would like to delete all derived curves, leaving only Carthage, KatyTailgate, and Agua Dulce. The other physical locations would be ShipChannel, Waha and Katy (non-tailgate)... Let me know your thoughts... O'Neal 3-9686
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer:
Physical Curve Mappings_Sitara