Question:
Based on the premise "The cover story maps a political agenda to engage the apathetic Generation fiscal restraint, investment in education and training, and class-based affirmative action.", can we conclude that "There is an apathy related to increasing our investment in education."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
it is not possible to tell

Question: Sentence A: You always were on their side, little sister.

Sentence B: You've always been their sworn enemy.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question: And it arose not out of the goodness of Nike CEO Phil Knight's heart, but to keep left-wing nongovernmental organizations--especially progressive ones--off his back.
It was fueled by a need to keep progressive, left-wing organizations out of his hair.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Problem: Here is a premise:
yes and oh absolutely what made me angry was that when there are groups such as ours there were twelve of us they automatically put the tip on the bill

Here is a hypothesis:
My group would get angry about the automatic tip they put on the bill.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Sentence 1: um i don't i don't care for Wheel Of Fortune very much

Sentence 2: Wheel of Fortune is one of my least favourite shows.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Premise:
"King Sigismund Vasa moved the royal residence from Krakew's Wawel Hill to Warsaw in 1609."
Hypothesis: The royal residence has always been situated at Wawel Hill.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
no