Question:
The Supplementary Information accompanying the final rule states that the final rule was not analyzed under Executive Order No.

Does it follow that "The Supplementary Information accompanying the final rule states that the final rule was not analyzed under Executive Order No."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
yes

Q: If Comrades, we have been betrayed! An ugly murmur arose., can we say that "We had thought that they could be trusted."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A: it is not possible to tell

Premise:
"The first is the Temple of Denderah some 60 km (43 miles) north."
Hypothesis: The first is the Temple of Denderah, further north there are more temples.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

it is not possible to tell

input question: No demanding ransom or threatening to crop her ears if I refuse. If this premise is true, does that tell us:"You can't demand ransom if I lose."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: yes

Question:
Based on the premise "Grantees were required to submit reports outlining their state plans by October 1, 1998.", can we conclude that "The grantees were supposed to submit reports about their plans on spending the money by October 1st of 1998."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
yes

input question: Rebuilt around the site of Alexander's city, it is once again a bustling port and industrial town, but almost no trace remains of its former glory. If this premise is true, does that tell us:"Although rebuilt, the town has yet to match its previous level of prestige."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer:
yes