In this task, you are given the abstract of a research paper. Your task is to generate a summary of this abstract. Your summary should not be very short, but it's better if it's not more than 30 words.

[Q]: We consider new variants of optimization algorithms. Our algorithms are based on the observation that mini-batch of stochastic gradients in consecutive iterations do not change drastically and consequently may be predictable. Inspired by the similar setting in online learning literature called Optimistic Online learning, we propose two new optimistic algorithms for AMSGrad and Adam, respectively, by exploiting the predictability of gradients. The new algorithms combine the idea of momentum method, adaptive gradient method, and algorithms in Optimistic Online learning, which leads to speed up in training deep neural nets in practice.
[A]: We consider new variants of optimization algorithms for training deep nets.

[Q]: Whereas it is believed that techniques such as Adam, batch normalization and, more recently, SeLU nonlinearities ''solve'' the exploding gradient problem, we show that this is not the case and that in a range of popular MLP architectures, exploding gradients exist and that they limit the depth to which networks can be effectively trained, both in theory and in practice. We explain why exploding gradients occur and highlight the {\it collapsing domain problem}, which can arise in architectures that avoid exploding gradients.

ResNets have significantly lower gradients and thus can circumvent the exploding gradient problem, enabling the effective training of much deeper networks, which we show is a consequence of a surprising mathematical property. By noticing that {\it any neural network is a residual network}, we devise the {\it residual trick}, which reveals that introducing skip connections simplifies the network mathematically, and that this simplicity may be the major cause for their success.
[A]: We show that in contras to popular wisdom, the exploding gradient problem has not been solved and that it limits the depth to which MLPs can be effectively trained. We show why gradients explode and how ResNet handles them.

[Q]: Particle-based inference algorithm is a promising method to efficiently generate samples for an intractable target distribution by iteratively updating a set of particles. As a noticeable example, Stein variational gradient descent (SVGD) provides a deterministic and computationally efficient update, but it is known to underestimate the variance in high dimensions, the mechanism of which is poorly understood. In this work we explore a connection between SVGD and MMD-based inference algorithm via Stein's lemma. By comparing the two update rules, we identify the source of bias in SVGD as a combination of high variance and deterministic bias, and empirically demonstrate that the removal of either factors leads to accurate estimation of the variance. In addition, for learning high-dimensional Gaussian target, we analytically derive the converged variance for both algorithms, and confirm that only SVGD suffers from the "curse of dimensionality".
[A]:
Analyze the underlying mechanisms of variance collapse of SVGD in high dimensions.