In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.
--------
Question: Comment: You seem to ignore the facts. There were 32,000 terrorist attacks by muslims against the rest of the world in the last 15 years. And even the Quebec mosque murders was not a terrorist attack. How many buddhist attacks have you seen? Or even christian attacks? To my knowledge the number is 0. With such a high number of attacks by one single religion, you really expect that muslims will be perceived in a good light? Many times we deal with people, we dont even know their religion. It's never written on their foreheads. So people like you instead of playing the offended should concede that there is a huge problem with islam. And you should sympathize with anyone who is against this violence, and this hate against the rest of the world by muslims. We need protection from muslims since they have showed how dangerous they are.

Answer: Non-obscene

Question: Comment: Because a gunman murdered six Muslims at prayer. Or were you forgetting that?

Answer: Non-obscene

Question: Comment: O'Leary isn't quite as obnoxious as Trump...it remains to be seen if that's even possible...and he isn't as far right, especially on social issues, regarding which he seems reasonably progressive. But he did offer a bribe to a democratically elected Premier to resign, and he clearly has no understanding of governance. He referred to the present P.M. as "surfer boy", and says the 2019 election will be an "exorcism", which reminds me of the "lock her up" nonsense of the Trump campaign. That's the kind of stuff we might expect from online trolls and 12 year olds, and we got sick of it with Harper and all the "nice hair" ads. We need an adult with some degree of gravitas to lead the CPC, not O'Leary.

Answer:
Non-obscene