R & A: A kid or child cannot be looking at a television through a microscope or two things at once.
no
Q: Given the sentence "A kid is looking through a microscope at an object." can we conclude that "A child is watching tv."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

R & A: The fact that construction worker cutting concrete with a pro-saw does not imply that a person cutting through concrete with a saw.
it is not possible to tell
Q: Premise: "Construction worker cutting concrete with a pro-saw."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A person cutting through concrete with a saw." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

R & A: The woman is carrying luggage so she can't not carry anything.
no
Q: Premise: "A woman wearing a cowboy hat and carrying luggage."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "The woman is not carrying anything." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

R & A: The dog may not belong to the woman. Therefore she may not be walking the dog. The dog may not be a poodle. The route of the dog walking may not be 'down the street'.
it is not possible to tell
Q:
Can we conclude from "Dog on a red leash with a woman." that "A woman is walking her poodle down the street."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell