Question: Sentence A: The H-2A workers' presence in the United States under the temporary worker visa entitled them to LSC eligibility.

Sentence B: A lot of the H-2A workers are not aware of their LSC eligibility.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question: Because she's the one who has double-work made for her, and she's talking about quitting.
She'll never even think to quit, she has such little work.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Problem: Here is a premise:
Pennsylvania's Arlen Specter, who is often lumped with the Mods, really belongs with the Prosecutors . Led by Specter and Mike DeWine (Ohio), who are, in fact, ex-prosecutors, the Prosecutors view themselves as the Senate's champions of The Law.

Here is a hypothesis:
Arlen Specter is from DC and is typically lumped in with the Prosecutors instead of the Mods.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Sentence 1: The whole journey took thirty-six hours.

Sentence 2: It took a day and a half to go down the trail.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question:
Unless the federal investment for civil legal services is substantially increased, a large segment of the U.S. population will continue to be without access to the justice system.

Does it follow that "A large segment of the US population does not have access to the justice system."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
yes

Question:
Based on the premise "Chamber of Commerce spent $7 million on advertising in support of GOP candidates", can we conclude that "In support of Republicans the Chamber advertised to the tune of $7 million."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
yes