Teacher: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.
Teacher: Now, understand the problem? If you are still confused, see the following example:
Comment: President lied under oath about consensual sex...
Not the same thing as rape.
Solution: Sexual-explicit
Reason: This comment explicitly mentions "consensual sex" and "rape", and thus is sexual-explicit.

Now, solve this instance: Comment: Look. This childish false equivalency and deflection is getting very tired. Yes, Wynne is just as deplorable as the average brain-dead Trump supporter. Trudeau II finds himself of his depth in a puddle. Are you happy now? Can we return to the actual topic that is being discussed in this thread now?

If the best you can do to support your dumpster fire of a Czar...errr...I mean "president" is malign Trudeau rather than present ANY evidence that is apropos of the matter at hand, then you are demonstrably unable to justify Dear Leader's embarrassing behaviour.
Student:
Non-sexual-explicit