Attached for your review and comment, please find Defendant's proposed discovery requests: <<discovery requests.doc>> <<med.rel.doc>> Christine Neely, Secretary to Lynn Paul Mattson and Kristen L. Brightmire Doerner, Saunders, Daniel & Anderson, L.L.P. Information in this message may be privileged or confidential. Information is intended for the sole use of the addressee. No consent is given for unauthorized viewing or distribution. - discovery requests.doc - med.rel.doc
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: Casey v. NEPCO
Stamos, I don't think many buying opportunities out there. The economy is going to get crushed this year. There's only one place to put one's money now, and that is in cash. The manufacturing sector is in dire straits and you will continue to see an increase in plant shutdowns and company layoffs. The Fed could continue to lower rates but there'll be little capital investment if consumer spending dries up. I feel we've just seen the beginning. I think the Dow will be trading under 8000 by the end of April. Psychologically, the California crisis will add to consumer fear. The crisis is not a short term problem. As a result, barring any Federal bailout, you could kiss that state's economy goodbye. Let me ask you a question; if you were paying (1) the highest real estate prices in the country, and (2) the highest energy prices for the least reliable power, in (3) the midst of a hi-tech meltdown, what would keep you or your company from closing shop and moving to a different state?? If you own any CA real estate, sell. The only way to solve the CA energy crisis is to reduce demand or increase supply. Since CA doesn't want any power plants in its backyard, the supply issue likely won't be solved anytime soon. So, how do impact demand?? You have to price energy(power/gas) so high that the discretionary user (household, manufacturer, commercial store) conserves by closing its plant, cutting back on the thermastat or running the commercial operation during off-peak hours. California will see this reduction in demand over time. If the blackouts subside it's because so many businesses have closed their doors for good or moved to another state. Without this, the blackouts will get much worse. If the state tries to get into the business of buying and selling electricity and gas, I would bet it will go bankrupt within 2-3 yrs. Could you imagine the impact on the national economy from the bankruptcy of the U.S.'s most prosperous state. Obviously this is only my opinion, but I would keep my eyes on the energy markets - that's where the key to the turnaround lies. Take Care and thanks for the email. Kevin
Answer: Good Buying Opportunity????
Here is an email: Lippman Consulting, Inc. is pleased to announce that it has just completed the 2nd quarterly of 2001 gas production report for the state of California. This report contains text and graphs depicting various historical statistics. The total California production volumes are separated by associated and non-associated volumes. The report also separates production by state and federal areas as well as onshore and offshore volumes. For the onshore volumes, we detail the production down to the district level while for the offshore volumes, we detail those down to the field level. In addition to showing historical production volumes in various categories, the report also provides the reader with monthly net gas storage injection and withdrawal volumes along with the total gas volumes in storage for the state. Working gas as well as cushion gas levels are also reported. California is a major consuming district and the level of production contained within the state has a direct bearing on the amount of gas imports that will be needed to satisfy demand.
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: CALIFORNIA 2nd QUARTER PRODUCTION REPORT
Q: I think I see whats happening. I believe deal 372088 is a bookout with deals 229344 and 229357. Should it also be a bookout with deal 227882? What about deals 169036and 217764? What about dea
Propose a subject line
A: ODD CES deal
IN: Today FERC issued the following draft orders: NYISO TEP and Bid Cap (ER01-3001): Commission granted NYISO's request to extend the currently effective $1000/MWh Bid Caps on certain NYISO adminstered markets, and to extend its Temporary Extraordinary Procedures for Correcting Market Design Flaws and Addressing Transitional Abnormalities, until the Northeastern RTO is operational. The Commission ordered NYISO to narrow the scope of the TEP, and to file tariff sheets doing so within 30 days. NYISO proposed virtual bidding procedures (ER01-3009; ER01-3153): Tariff changes to implement virtual bidding were approved. The changes would allow market participants to bid non-physical generation and load into the day-ahead market and settle the bids in the real-time market. Also accepted were NYISOs Market Mitigation Measures to address gaming or market power strategies that might emerge as a result of the virtual bidding. NYISO - Cost responsibility for new interconnections. (ER01-2967): Tariff changes allocating cost responsibility for interconnection facilities. The provisions allocate to developers 100% of the cost of facilities necessary to physically interconnect the project. Additionally, developers are allocated the coswts for transmission system upgrades that would not have been made "but for" the interconnection, minus the cost of any facilities that the NYISO's regional plan dictates would have been necessary anyway for load growth and reliability purposes. ISO-NE - Interim Bid Caps (ER01-3086): Commission approved extension of bid caps until the Northeastern RTO is operational. Calpine v. ISO-NE (EL01-124): Commission granted complaint by Calpine and Mirant, finding that ISO-NE has amended Market Rule 5 to exclude external contracts from setting the energy clearing price, in violation of a Commission order. If you need further information, please let me know. Susan Lindberg x30596

Generate a subject line.

OUT: Orders issued today in NYISO and ISO-NE proceedings
IN: This is an email
Dear Market Participant, Technical Bulletin # 77 - Generator Start-Up Cost Guarantee - has been revised in response to Market Participant comments and will soon be posted to the NYISO web site. For your convenience, clean and redlined versions of the Technical Bulletin are attached. The purpose of our Technical Bulletins is to facilitate participation in the NYISO by communicating various NYISO concepts, techniques, and processes to Market Participants before they can be formally documented in a NYISO manual.

What is the subject?

OUT:
NYISO - Technical Bulletin # 77 - Generator Start-Up Cost Guarantee (revised)