Question:
Based on the premise "These amended regulations on governing performance appraisals for senior executives require agencies to establish performance management systems", can we conclude that "These amended regulations require agencies to eliminate their performance management system."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
no

Question: Sentence A: and what would you do

Sentence B: What would you do about the gnomes?

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question: Across the street is the incongruous but elegant Toyota Automobile Showroom, once the Chamber of Commerce and worth noting for its fine blue-and-white azulejo (tile) vignettes that depict scenes from old Madeira.
The building across the street is decorated with blue-and-white tiled images that depict scenes from old Madeira
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Problem: Here is a premise:
The new constitution, tailor-made to de Gaulle's authoritarian requirements, placed the president above parliament, where he could pursue his own policies outside the messy arena of party politics.

Here is a hypothesis:
The new constitution was authoritarian.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Sentence 1: His clothes were totally shredded.

Sentence 2: His outfit was neat and in tact.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: no

Premise:
"yeah speaking of uh let's see big corporate benefits i wonder if uh i wonder if they looked uh have you ever heard of this administaff type thing this staff leasing that a lot of companies do"
Hypothesis: There is this administaff thing that this staff leasing that some companies do, have you heard about it?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
yes