Premise:
"exactly and the same with the airlines back in the days when they were uh controlled and and uh uh transcontinental or um um um um interstate uh trucking i mean as soon as the uh the federal government gave up control on all that they just went to hell in a hand basket"
Hypothesis: Without government restriction, everyone loses.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

it is not possible to tell

input question: There are two other Holy Face handkerchiefs one in Jaen and the other in the Vatican. If this premise is true, does that tell us:"There is a Holy Face handkerchief located in Jaen and in the Vatican."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: yes

Question:
Based on the premise "To the side of the choir pilgrims queue to descend to the Grotto of the Manger, a simple marble-clad niche in the cave wall that is lit by an array of hanging lamps.", can we conclude that "The hanging lamps are oil lamps, and are refueled weekly."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
it is not possible to tell

Question: Sentence A: I could.

Sentence B: I am able to.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Question: For reasons unknown, the smell of BBQ sauce attracts them.
They like the smell of BBQ sauce for some reason.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Problem: Here is a premise:
This is an important assumption, because fine particles from power plant emissions are chemically different from directly emitted fine particles from both mobile sources and other industrial facilities, but no clear scientific grounds exist for supporting differential effects estimates by particle type.

Here is a hypothesis:
Not all emissions from industrial plants are the same.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer:
yes