IN: This is an email
I just got off the phone with Margaret Lester, a contract administrator at Dynegy, and Harlan Murphy, an attorney she works with. There was some misinformation communicated to them about EOL, and I told them the only way we would trade online with them was under the existing master, not under the online GTCs, we wanted the bankruptcy protection the master affords. They want to replace the old ERMS Master with an ISDA and I told them we would be happy to generate the master. Can I get some credit from you so I can turn around a master quickly, or we will have to work off their form, which will then become an ISDA comparison which will be a lot more work in the long run. Much thanks as usual for your prompt help!

What is the subject?

OUT: Dynegy Marketing and Trade
QUESTION: I will be out of the office from December 14th until next year. In my absence, your New HR Rep will be Terry Bosien at Ext 35230 and Sonja Galloway at Ext 35796 will assist her. Thanks and Happy Holidays to all of you. Sheila Walton
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: NEW HR REP
Ellen, Attached is the letter we would like signed appointing Enline Solutions agent for Jefferson-Cocke County Utility District. Please let me know if you have any questions. Stacy
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: Agency Appointment
Dear Sara: Hope all is well. I apologies for the delay in reverting to you. In any event, I have "marked-up" ENA's proposed documentation with some amendments. Please note that I have based my response on the recently executed ISDA Agreement between CSFBi and Enron Credit Limited. Please note that I will need to discuss with our credit the proposed threshold amounts. I will revert to you on this point shortly. Additionally, I would like to discuss with you in detail the events of default relating to the custodian. Once you have had an opportunity to review the attached document, please kindly contact me to discuss this matter further. As always I thank you for your cooperation. Kind regards
Answer: ISDA Master Agreement between CSFB, London branch and Enron North America Corp.
Here is an email: For questions or comments regarding this report please contact G. Britt Whitman at ex:5-4014 or Kristin Walsh at ex:3-9510. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ? MOU Passes Assembly, Faces Fight in Senate ? CPUC Direct Access Delayed by Senator SoCal Developments As reported in the press this morning, the bailout passed the Assembly late last night by a 41-32 vote. It will now head to the Senate, where very significant opposition is expected. Along with his opposition to the changes made in the Assembly regarding the size of businesses that pay the dedicated rate component for the bailout, Senator Burton also has expressed privately that he is against paying twice book value for SoCal's transmission assets. Senator Places Hold on CPUC Direct Access Vote Regarding the CPUC's decision to delay its hearings on the rate order and various other bond implementation measures (which led Treasurer Angelides to announce that the bond issue will have to be re-timed), this delay is due to a bill by Senator Burton that passed the Assembly Appropriations Committee yesterday. Burton's bill would take the place of the current proposed rate agreement (from Governor Davis) and would require greater disclosure and transparency in DWR ratemaking, as well as separate the payment streams for the bonds from payment streams for power. In doing so, Burton's bill preserves more PUC authority than would be preserved under the rate order currently before the PUC - thus the delay in action. PG&E also supports Burton's bill, which is very likely to pass the Assembly and which the governor will likely have to sign. If this bill is signed, PG&E's legal challenges to the DWR and PUC may be canceled. The popularity of Burton's bill (as opposed to the rate agreement from the Governor) is leading many observers to conclude that Burton has replaced Davis as the most powerful, influential politician in California. Burton's goal is to ensure that any direct access that is offered to large users in 2003 (when there will be a dip in power procurement by DWR, resulting in a net short) is only temporary and does not turn into a "jail break." DWR's power procurement will rise again in 2004; Burton wants to ensure that businesses will have to return to purchasing power from DWR at that time. The CTMA is opposed to Burton's bill and to the bailout if no direct access is offered. The CTMA wants its members to be able to escape from buying power from the DWR (and therefore paying off the bonds) permanently in 2003.
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: California Update 9-07-2001
QUESTION: Tyson has gotten a call-back from the governor's office. She's going to call him back shortly to try to sell him on the plan (i.e., private sector to the rescue) and ensure that he'll come to the party. She'll call me back as soon as she talks to him. Curious--do we have any sense of whether there's much activity within the
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS:
Tyson Update