input question: Professionals who become more sensitive to possible abuse, or more adept at noticing it, would make more reports to Westat--even if the actual incidence had not risen. If this premise is true, does that tell us:"It is unclear if abuse is occurring more often, or simply being reported more often. "?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: it is not possible to tell

Question:
Based on the premise "Tommy heard himself saying idiotically: "The gorse won't be there after all these years." And Julius replied solemnly: "I guess you're right." Tommy suddenly pointed with a shaking hand.", can we conclude that "Tommy's hand was shaking when he tried to point with it."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
yes

Question: Sentence A: But (as Stein pointed out in the Committee), every dollar Social Security invests privately, instead of lending to the Treasury (as happens now), is an extra dollar the government must borrow from private capital markets to finance the national debt.

Sentence B: Sometimes Social security invests privately instead of giving it to the Treasury.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Question: The Department did not discuss comments beyond the scope of the rule or comments on the requirement to establish a deduction since the requirement was mandated by statute.
The Department was loyal to the requirements mandated by statute.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Problem: Here is a premise:
well see our favorite TV show i i i live in a dorm and our favorite TV show is Cheers

Here is a hypothesis:
We've never watched a single episode of Cheers.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question:
yeah well have you heard anything about Jim Palmer

Does it follow that "Have you seen Jim Palmer?"?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
no