In this task, you are given a part of an article. Your task is to generate headline (title) for this text. Preferred headlines are under fifteen words.

[EX Q]: We consider linear models for stochastic dynamics. To any such model can be as-<lb>sociated a network (namely a directed graph) describing which degrees of freedom<lb>interact under the dynamics. We tackle the problem of learning such a network<lb>from observation of the system trajectory over a time interval T .<lb>We analyze the l1-regularized least squares algorithm and, in the setting in which<lb>the underlying network is sparse, we prove performance guarantees that are uni-<lb>form in the sampling rate as long as this is sufficiently high. This result substan-<lb>tiates the notion of a well defined 'time complexity' for the network inference<lb>problem. keywords: Gaussian processes, model selection and structure learning, graphical models, sparsity<lb>and feature selection.
[EX A]: Learning Networks of Stochastic Differential Equations

[EX Q]: LTL synthesis the construction of a function to satisfy a logical specification formulated in Linear Temporal Logic is a 2EXPTIME-complete problem with relevant applications in controller synthesis and a myriad of artificial intelligence applications. In this research note we consider De Giacomo and Vardi's variant of the synthesis problem for LTL formulas interpreted over finite rather than infinite traces. Rather surprisingly, given the existing claims on complexity, we establish that LTL synthesis is EXPTIME-complete for the finite interpretation, and not 2EXPTIME-complete as previously reported. Our result coincides nicely with the planning perspective where non-deterministic planning with full observability is EXPTIME-complete and partial observability increases the complexity to 2EXPTIME-complete; a recent related result for LTL synthesis shows that in the finite case with partial observability, the problem is 2EXPTIME-complete.
[EX A]: Finite LTL Synthesis is EXPTIME-complete

[EX Q]: In practice, a ranking of objects with respect to given set of criteria is of considerable importance. However, due to lack of knowledge, information of time pressure, decision makers might not be able to provide a (crisp) ranking of objects from the top to the bottom. Instead, some objects might be ranked equally, or better than other objects only to some degree. In such cases, a generalization of crisp rankings to fuzzy rankings can be more useful. The aim of the article is to introduce the notion of a fuzzy ranking and to discuss its several properties, namely orderings, similarity and indecisiveness. The proposed approach can be used both for group decision making or multiple criteria decision making when uncertainty is involved.
[EX A]:
Fuzzy Rankings: Properties and Applications