Detailed Instructions: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.
See one example below:
Problem: Comment: President lied under oath about consensual sex...
Not the same thing as rape.
Solution: Sexual-explicit
Explanation: This comment explicitly mentions "consensual sex" and "rape", and thus is sexual-explicit.

Problem: Comment: So if he didn't stick the tip in and just finger banged the crap out of his 6 year old niece/cousin/sister whoever, while she "begged him to stop because it hurt" (that part is in the case file) instead, then by your measure that makes it "lesser" on the 'scale of molestation' WOW. Also, the media around this case has nothing to do with trying to shame someone personally or ruin a sport/program/team or whatever, what it's doing is presenting a very serious question about issues within the NCAA recruiting process, athletes and scholarship recipients with felony offenses, sex offenders on campus, and college athletes who fail to comply with the stipulations of their parole. It needs to be discussed, and changes need to be made.
Solution:
Sexual-explicit