Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.

Ex Input:
Anchorage would be a ghost town if not propped up by tax money - state money and especially federal money. The people who lecture and pontificate about rural Alaska's dependence on public money are clueless hypocrites. And racist too! Most of Alaska's wealth - spiritual, cultural, economic comes out of rural Alaska. The whole world knows this. Read a book.

Ex Output:
Yes

Ex Input:
"SWAG" stands for Scientific Wild-Assed Guess. It's what passes for science when the science doesn't truly exist.

I chose a random date because no one can give an answer to my question whether I suggest a date of tomorrow, 5 years from now, 10 years from now or any other date. The science to answer that question does not exist!

Nor does the science to answer my second question. Why should the society write a multi-billion dollar blank check for something which not only doesn't currently exist but for which a theory hasn't even been developed?

As an agnostic, I resent your attempt to knock my argument down by labeling my response as 'sinful religious conservatism'.

I am a conservative; I will not pay for a pig in a poke when you can't even tell me the size of the poke or the gender of the pig or anything else about this alleged pig which no one has ever seen. Try selling me a unicorn; you will get the same response.

Ex Output:
Yes

Ex Input:
RICHARD RHYNER: shooting peoples dogs should be a felony. You obviously are not a dog person. this piece of shit should be thrown out of Alaska. Lose his job ? He should be leaned over a doghouse so my males could have their way with him. HE WASNT PROTECTING HIS FAMILY ! THE DOG DIDNT ATTACK HIM YOU AND THIS JERK ARE BOTH SICKOS !

Ex Output:
Yes