Categorize the comment on the basis of severe toxicity. If the comment is severely toxic output Yes, otherwise output No.

[EX Q]: "It is already Federal law not to have a weapon within 600 feet of a school or a day care center"
.

Nope.

(Though you're right about the ridiculousness of the patchwork, it only applies if the person KNOWS there's a school too close to where s/he is.)

.
First off, it's 1000' (apx. 3 blocks), including on the property & in the buildings, though there are exceptions... including having a CCL from the state in which the school sits.

.
Secondly, that federal "gun-free" school zone law only applies to grades 1-12, not day care centers, not kindergartens, not colleges.
.

For the actual federal law giving the definitions, see 18USC921 (25) and (26) here:

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/921

.
For the federal "gun-free" school zone law itself, see 18USC922(q)(2):

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/922
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: the liberal propaganda machine is in full swing. These shameless liberals will be dominating the RG op-ed page till the election puking their shameless lies to try and get Vinis elected. These shameless lying liberals will do everything they can to deflect from the fact Vinis has absolutely no experience or qualifications to be mayor of the 2nd largest city in Oregon.
[EX A]: Yes

[EX Q]: Cannabis never should have been banned in the first place.
Voters didn't ban using in parks, the city did.
Voters didn't amend the Indoor Clean Air Act, the legislature did.
Voters have little to do with this.
But no, I don't care about pissing a few people off with the smell of weed.
[EX A]:
Yes