Question: The University of Houston System's annual impact on the Houston area's economy equates to that of a major corporation: $1.1 billion in new funds attracted annually to the Houston area, $3.13 billion in total economic benefit and 24,000 local jobs generated. This is in addition to the 12,500 new graduates the U.H. System produces every year who enter the workforce in Houston and throughout the state of Texas. These degree-holders tend to stay in Houston. After five years, 80.5% of graduates are still living and working in the region.
Try to answer this question if possible: Even after five years, how many graduates remain in Texas?
Answer: unanswerable
Question: Present-day statutes from across the nation use the same words and phrases, requiring modern executions to take place within a wall or enclosure to exclude public view. Connecticut General Statute 54100 requires death sentences to be conducted in an "enclosure" which "shall be so constructed as to exclude public view." Kentucky Revised Statute 431.220 and Missouri Revised Statute 546.730 contain substantially identical language. New Mexico's former death penalty, since repealed, see N.M. Stat. 31-14-12, required executions be conducted in a "room or place enclosed from public view." Similarly, a dormant Massachusetts law, see Mass. Gen. Law ch. 279 60, required executions to take place "within an enclosure or building." North Carolina General Statute 15-188 requires death sentences to be executed "within the walls" of the penitentiary, as do Oklahoma Statute Title 22 1015 and Montana Code 46-19-103. Ohio Revised Code 2949.22 requires that "[t]he enclosure shall exclude public view." Similarly, Tennessee Code 40-23-116 requires "an enclosure" for "strict seclusion and privacy." United States Code Title 18 3596 and the Code of Federal Regulations 28 CFR 26.4 limit the witnesses permitted at federal executions.
Try to answer this question if possible: What state's law mandated that executions occur in ""room or place enclosed from private view"?
Answer: unanswerable
Question: A major concern of Hegel's Phenomenology of Spirit (1807) and of the philosophy of Spirit that he lays out in his Encyclopedia of the Philosophical Sciences (18171830) is the interrelation between individual humans, which he conceives in terms of "mutual recognition." However, what Climacus means by the aforementioned statement, is that Hegel, in the Philosophy of Right, believed the best solution was to surrender one's individuality to the customs of the State, identifying right and wrong in view of the prevailing bourgeois morality. Individual human will ought, at the State's highest level of development, to properly coincide with the will of the State. Climacus rejects Hegel's suppression of individuality by pointing out it is impossible to create a valid set of rules or system in any society which can adequately describe existence for any one individual. Submitting one's will to the State denies personal freedom, choice, and responsibility.
Try to answer this question if possible: Whose will did Hegel believe should prevail over that of the individual?
Answer: State
Question: An exception to the usual European qualification system happened in 2005, after Liverpool won the Champions League the year before, but did not finish in a Champions League qualification place in the Premier League that season. UEFA gave special dispensation for Liverpool to enter the Champions League, giving England five qualifiers. UEFA subsequently ruled that the defending champions qualify for the competition the following year regardless of their domestic league placing. However, for those leagues with four entrants in the Champions League, this meant that if the Champions League winner finished outside the top four in its domestic league, it would qualify at the expense of the fourth-placed team in the league. No association can have more than four entrants in the Champions League. This occurred in 2012, when Chelsea who had won the Champions League the previous year, but finished sixth in the league qualified for the Champions League in place of Tottenham Hotspur, who went into the Europa League.
Try to answer this question if possible: Which team was denied entry into the Champions League in 2012 due to being bumped out of the running by the defending champion?
Answer:
Tottenham Hotspur