Not all fights in hockey games happen in payoff games and do not occur between rival teams necessarily.. So what could be the question?
Question followed by answer: Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "A referee stops a hockey fight."
Hypothesis: "Two rival hockey teams fight during a playoff game."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
it is not possible to tell

One would not dribble a basketball and soccer ball at the same time because they are used in different sports.. So what could be the question?
Question followed by answer: Premise: "The player in the white is dribbling the basketball."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "The player is dribbling the soccer ball." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
no

A boat can't be out of water and in a dock.. So what could be the question?
Question followed by answer: Given the sentence "A blue boat sitting on a dock." can we conclude that "A boat out of the water."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
no

People can be watchind many things including a dog or a car wreck.. So what could be the question?
Question followed by answer:
Can we conclude from "A dog bounding across the sandy landscape in front of people watching." that "The people are watching a car wreck."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
no