Q: Mike after the calc tonight the NET value of the BPA deal (51353) was 22.8 MM. Therefore we did a schedule c for 22.8MM vs the 25MM we had spoke about. Please advise if you would like to change this. Thanks,
Propose a subject line
A: Schedule C

Q: Mr. Kenneth Lay, I am the main shareholder of the european company called ECOSQUARE. The company is owned also by NOMURA, the bank of Japan, and by CISALPINA GESTIONI, an italian equity fund. I'm writing You about the facts of ENRON, today. I'm interested in Your activities about the trading of energy, raw materials and so on but also in a strong partnership could take a new interest from institutional investors. ECOSQUARE works as broker of wastes, by-products, secondary materials and recyclables, all around the world. ECOSQUARE was founded in 2000 and we are quickly developing a very good international business model with an addressable market evaluated in many billions of US dollar. Today I am in New York City and I would have the fly to return in Europe tomorrow evening. If You consider interesting evaluate the partnership I will meet You in NYC as soon as possible before Sunday when I have to go in Italy for some meetings. I am 32 old, I have studied nuclear engineering, I was been an assistant of Professor Ilya Prigogine in Brussels, I am the founder and chief executive of ECOSQUARE Co. I am well known in Harvard University too. From 2002 I will be in World Economic Forum as new member. You can find other informations about me also by BLOOMBERG Terminals in "Who'sWho". You can reach me in United States today by mobile +39-348-4767153. Kind Regards,
Propose a subject line
A: URGENT PROPOSAL- TO MR. K.LAY

Q: I think we are on the right track from our meeting yesterday. I talked to Patti today and she is confirming the way we want to do things from a users perspective. My thought is that we get a good, general, working model as to how the information will flow, then take it back to our groups and go over different scenarios within each region, such as Opal Plant, Socal, etc. We can see how the information will flow and see what we need to tinker with. I also have a few questions we need to think about at some point, and I did not want to forget them. 1. When we make a change to an existing upstream/downstream contract, how will we notify the counterparties that a change has occurred. 2. Should we lock out our customer's at some time so they can't make changes at a late time? We could do the rest over the phone. 3. On EDI pipes, we could conceivably make changes up to 11:45 am, but it would affect customers whose noms are due at 11:30. I thought these were just questions we might want to think about. I'm sure there are a lot of others. Thanks.
Propose a subject line
A: Contract Exchange

Q: As I mentioned to you last week, there are currently about 50 EBS employees who are exempt from the Enron e-mail retention policy. These individuals were exempted from the e-mail retention policy in order to preserve documents related to the Blockbuster litigation. Now that the Blockbuster litigation is over, there is no reason for these individuals to continue to be exempt from the e-mail retention policy. I propose sending the following e-mail to the currently exempt EBS employees:
Propose a subject line
A:
E-mail retention