Q: If Daniel, wrapping up the session, soberly reminded his colleagues that those who have abused their absolute freedoms by making movies that are soiling and unwholesome have only themselves to blame if Hollywood's era of unregulated bliss is over., can we say that "Daniel told his colleagues that they are to blame for Hollywood's current state, but it was inevitable at any rate."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A: it is not possible to tell

Premise:
"But that was for the future."
Hypothesis: That was for the present.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

no

input question: The American Ambassador, Mr. Carter, who had taken the liberty, he said, of bringing an old friend, Sir William Beresford, with him, Archdeacon Cowley, Dr. Hall, those two youthful adventurers, Miss Prudence Cowley and Mr. Thomas Beresford, and last, but not least, as guest of honour, Miss Jane Finn. If this premise is true, does that tell us:"Mr. Carter, the American Ambassador, decided to take a large number of friends and guests with him."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: yes

Question:
Based on the premise "'History's no fun on paper.", can we conclude that "History isn't entertaining."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
yes

Question: Sentence A: and i don't believe any of us would have to purchase any extra vacation days if they did that

Sentence B: If they did that, we'd all have to buy extra vacation days.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question: Sentence A: However, the mix shouldn't just be geographic.

Sentence B: The mix should be purely geographic.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer:
no