IN: This is an email
Bob & Leslie, Sally asked me to set up several meetings for next week. 1st one - subject: exactly what CommodityLogic is going to mean to us and how it will work for us. She wants the two of you plus: Leslie - can you designate your best person for ConfirmLogic & InvoiceLogic and Bob your best person for NomLogic. Probably 1 &1/2 hours Monday. Please let me know your availability. 2nd one: Will probably be Thursday morning - can you check availability for this one also (2 hours). Participants would be all of the above + Greg Piper, Tom Gros, Carrie Slagle, Project Managers for InvoiceLogic, ConfirmLogic, & BankLogic + Mark Taylor in Legal. Purpose: Discussion between Project Managers and end users on CommodityLogic. I will wait to hear from you Monday morning re: 1st meeting. I will talk to Greg's assistant re: his availability on Thursday and get back with you on 2nd meeting. Thanks,

What is the subject?

OUT: Meetings for next week

IN: This is an email
We have received the following executed Master Agreement: NOTE: This master appears to have been signed in 1996 and didn't make its way down to Houston until now. Type of Contract: Master Agreement (ECT Canada Form) Effective Date: 06/16/95 Executed Date: 06/24/96 Enron Entity: Enron Capital and Trade Resources Canada Corp., now known as Enron Canada Corp. Counterparty: Originally, NOVAGAS CLEARINGHOUSE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, now through name changes and merger, DYNEGY CANADA INC. Transactions Covered: Energy price swaps or option transactions only (no pulp & paper, weather, interest rate & currency or FX) GLOBAL CONTRACTS: We need to get this master inputted immediately into the EnronOnline System so all of the confirmations for ENA and ECC will immediately roll up under this master. CONFIRM DESK: Please immediately start rolling up all the ENA and ECC trades under this master, whether online, offline, or brokered trades.

What is the subject?

OUT: Dynegy Canada Inc.

IN: This is an email
Hi Mike, Sorry I missed you when you returned by call this am. I have some concerns about the voice mail you left re: assignment language. Enron can't stay on the hook for payment if the agreement is assigned, as this would bust the financing/accounting arrangement. What we have tried to do to meet your concerns is to see that ABB has a contract with a party which is as financially sound as Enron by adding the guaranty language. This addresses ABB's request that the party with the payment obligation have the "financial wherewithall" to make the payments. This is a big change from where we were in the last contract. I've had a request to get an approximate storage cost (monthly) for budgetary purposes. This is in connection with the buy back arrangement. Can you give me a guesstimate? Thanks,

What is the subject?

OUT:
Contract