In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Ex Input:
Comment: I posted the same comment on the Broomfield fracking mess, applies here also

What is the continually last century type argument stating that research must prove harm before we act? How about we study the area get baseline readings and any changes due to industry are required to be rectified, air, water, sound etc. Why are we experimenting on our families and neighbors? Should we have people drink extreme amounts of molybdenum and find out 40 years later it harmed them? Why? Its cruel and ignorant.

Ex Output:
Non-sexual-explicit

Ex Input:
Comment: It's the Republican ethos--"just grab 'em by the pussy"--and the rich get what they want at the expense of everything and everyone else.

Ex Output:
Sexual-explicit

Ex Input:
Comment: Harvard educated --- so was George Bush, so were many drunk Kennedys, so were many Saudi princes. Do you really think the Aga Khan had a SAT score in the top 1%

Same principals for his British birth

And you must be joking referring to his wealth because he was chosen by his father to continue the great work his faith does.

Anyway your rationale is extremely weak.

btw I have great respect for the Aga Khan having become friends with a few Ismali Muslims almost 40 years ago. However I believe the Prime Minister made a mistake secretly leaving the country as well as vacationing outside the country.

Ex Output:
Non-sexual-explicit