Someone operating an open wood stove must be in front of it.. So what could be the question?
Question followed by answer: Given the sentence "A man in an apron operating an open wood stove." is it true that "A guy in front of a stove."?
yes
Just because the hockey players are fighting over the puck doesn't mean they will get benched.
The question and answer are below.
Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "Hockey player in white and a hockey player in red fighting over the puck."
Hypothesis: "The hockey players are going to get benched."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
it is not possible to tell
Not all that stand in front of a red wall that is waiting for a friend.
The question and answer are below.
Premise: "A man in a black hat stands in front of a red wall."
Hypothesis: "A man in a black hat is waiting for his friend."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
it is not possible to tell
Two men are shirtless is a clear contradiction of the two men in first sentence wearing white shirts.. So what could be the question?
Question followed by answer: Given the sentence "Two men in white shirts shave their heads." can we conclude that "Two men are shirtless."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
no
The girl either has her hands in the air or is eating.
The question and answer are below.
Premise: "A girl in pink socks jumping with her hands in the air."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "The girl is eating while she is jumping up and down." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
no
He refers to a man not a girl. They cannot be standing beside a train and a car simultaneously.
The question and answer are below.
Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "A man is standing beside a train."
Hypothesis: "A girl is standing by a car."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
no