Problem: Here is a premise:
(Kohler's Dictionary for Accountants) HUMAN CAPITAL -Expenses incurred for education and training programs financed by the Federal Government for the benefit of the public and designed to increase or maintain national economic productive capacity.

Here is a hypothesis:
The Federal Government educated the public for their benefit.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Sentence 1: perhaps a tad derivative of golub, but still an artist of far more restraint and maturity than one might expect of someone her age.

Sentence 2: She paints like a two year old.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: no

Question:
Don't ask me to help you, because I won't.

Does it follow that "I won't help you so don't ask."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
yes

Q: If in which Quentin Compson puts together a story that rattles family skeletons and points up the reality that white Southern culture is blacker than meets the eye., can we say that "Compson's study is of family skeletons of Latinos. "?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A: no

Premise:
"If he had lied under oath about parking illegally I wouldn't be so disgusted."
Hypothesis: I am very disgusted that he lied under oath about something so trivial like parking illegally.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

no

Sentence 1: If certain pertinent information is prohibited from general disclosure, the audit report should state the nature of the information omitted and the requirement that makes the omission necessary.

Sentence 2: No mention of any omitted information should be stated in the audit report.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer:
no