In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.

Comment: Yes, the IM law requires the Department to establish moose population objectives and the BOG approves. In most cases, unrealistically high population objectives have been set that are unsustainable. This is what one can expect from a BOG that is entirely hunters and hunting guides and a Department that is addicted to hunting license revenues. The result is predictable: endless killing of bears and wolves while moose objectives are seldom reached. And this is at a cost of over $ 1 million per year, and at a greater cost to keeping Alaska's wild ecosystems healthy. We are allowing ourselves to be bamboozled by an inherently corrupt system that favors about 14% of the Alaskans that hunt, and its not even working for them. Its time to "repeal, and replace" the IM law with a wildlife conservation policy that is scientifically based, preserves ecosystem health, and respects democratic principles.
Non-threat

Comment: That's a misunderstanding of natural law. Sexuality is not ordered towards sodomy - it's ordered towards PIV sex. Misuse of the sexual faculties to perform other actions, be it masturbation, sodomy, etc, is immoral.
Non-threat

Comment: Maybe too early for Dr. Alzheimer character. The usual high pitched voice demanding punishment to Chinese millionaires. Theirs is ill gotten. So it is upto average Canadians to trample them, throw bricks to their windows, set their properties on fire. Just get them. C-H-I-N-A. Kidnap their precious offsprings who are international students and rape them, and steal from them. Also how I shuddered at the intensity of hate this man has. How there was a joy in relishing violence because it was in this deluded man's mind a justice.
Threat