Given a paragraph about movies, and a set of conversational question answers about the paragraph, answer a follow-up question from the paragraph. The paragraph has the prefix 'CONTEXT:'. Each conversation question has a prefix 'Q:' followed by the answer prefix 'A:', and the follow-up question has a prefix 'FOLLOWUP_Q:'.

Example Input: CONTEXT: Spoiler It's pretty obvious from the blood on Fitts that he was the shooter. Also, there is a shot near the end of the film that shows Fitts' gun case sans a revolver which is seen earlier. These combined make it clear that Fitts is the shooter. Fitts believed that Lester was his son's gay lover. You may recall that there is a scene where Fitts sees his son and Lester in Lester's garage through the garage window, in what appears to be a compromising position. In fact, Fitts' son is merely rolling a joint while Lester reclines in a chair. <sep> Q: Who shot Lester Burnham in "American Beauty" (1999)? A: It's pretty obvious from the blood on Fitts that he was the shooter Q: Does Fitts have a gun? A: Also, there is a shot near the end of the film that shows Fitts' gun case sans a revolver which is seen earlier Q: Why did he shoot him? A: Fitts believed that Lester was his son's gay lover Q: Why was that a problem? A: You may recall that there is a scene where Fitts sees his son and Lester in Lester's garage through the garage window, in what appears to be a compromising position <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Were they actually lovers?
Example Output: In fact, Fitts' son is merely rolling a joint while Lester reclines in a chair

Example Input: CONTEXT: That is just a simple plot twist, or character development. The Harry Potter series is a pretty straight forward tale of good vs evil, and does not deviate much from that. A twist ending would be Harry becoming a worse villain than Voldy, or Voldy winning and everybody dying. Or that it was all a dream of Harry, who's still living under the crawlspace. <sep> Q: Is a twist ending that occurs at the end of a series of films still called a twist ending? A: A twist ending would be Harry becoming a worse villain than Voldy, or Voldy winning and everybody dying Q: Are you talking about Harry Potter? A: That is just a simple plot twist, or character development <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Is Harry a good guy or bad guy in the story?
Example Output: The Harry Potter series is a pretty straight forward tale of good vs evil, and does not deviate much from that

Example Input: CONTEXT: The movie is an adaptation of Peter Shaffer's play of the same name, which suffers from the same criticism of historical accuracy. I can't find any references to hand, but I imagine that Shaffer was using the historical setting to stage a story of artistic genius and professional rivalry that makes such a good story, and that accuracy was somewhat secondary. It is true that Salieri and Mozart were professional rivals, and that Mozart fairly obviously was the more successful - but it is also clear that their rivalry did not descend into hatred nor that Salieri had any part in Mozart's death, despite rumors. On a positive front the movie makes it very clear that Salieri admires and respects Mozart's abilities, and you could argue that the movie is less about professional rivalry, than about Salieri's argument with God about his somewhat less stellar skills. <sep> Q: Why is the Salieri-Mozart relationship projected falsely in the movie Amadeus? A: you could argue that the movie is less about professional rivalry, than about Salieri's argument with God about his somewhat less stellar skills <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: So, are you saying it wasn't based on factual events?
Example Output:
It is true that Salieri and Mozart were professional rivals