Categorize the comment on the basis of toxicity. If the comment is toxic (harmful, malicious, derogatory, threat, insult, identity attck, etc.) output Yes, otherwise output No.

Ex Input:
No, Martin. You quite clearly stated that you were offended that people similarly situated to your grandfather viewed his music as "speaking to something authentic". You are implying that it is YOU who determines what is or is not authentic - and since you have determined that his music does NOT speak to something authentic, you are offended that those people who DO think it speaks to something authentic exist at all.

It's very confusing to try to sort through, because it requires two wildly irrational assumptions. First is that Springsteen's heart, mind, and soul have been irrevocably damaged by the acquisition of money to the point he can not empathize with the very class of people he spent his entire life surrounded by, and is no longer capable of sincerity about those issues and experiences. The second is that somehow YOU have a sense of what is and is not authentic which surpasses both his AND his fans, who despite your claims, come from all walks of life, all over the globe.

Ex Output:
No

Ex Input:
Go look outside at the Boeing 747 that just flew past. Now take this quiz, ( pick A or B )

(A) Bill Nye worked on the Hydraulic Control system that keeps the plane in the air

(B) Sarah Palin is unable to understand how something that big stays in the air.

Darn the pesky science with all those numbers and facts!!!!!!!!

Ex Output:
Yes

Ex Input:
My cousin worked for many years as a special education teacher in a small Oregon district. He finally left because he was, most of the time, the district's only qualified special-ed person. There was often no support or alternate ways to meet the needs of students. He was asked to do more than he could do.

I also see this issue through my service on the Teacher Standards and Practices Commission, where we consider both requirements for special ed teachers and, sometimes, the consequences when teachers are asked to do more than they can do.

What matters is not what the law requires, because the law is an abstraction. What matters is what people are capable of doing on the ground. Governments will get the results that are possible, not the results that are theoretically correct.

If the government's reaction to unmanageable situations is to issue orders that cannot be obeyed, it is time to revisit the underlying issues and how society has chosen to resolve them.

Ex Output:
No