In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

[EX Q]: Comment: Is there less sexual assault in areas where the electricity is generated from fossil fuels compared to areas that generate their electricity by nuclear power. Are off the grid solar powered homes or communities areas of high sexual assault. The method that you generate electricity does not influence the occurrence of sexual assault and for Perry to suggest so shows either his ignorance or his extreme partisanship. Either way, he demonstrates that he should be ignored and is unfit for his position.
[EX A]: Non-identity-attack

[EX Q]: Comment: But the problem ( as well identified in the CBC report) is that we do not know whether genuine trusts were set up in Cayman and other places. If they are mere shells and all the decisions took place in Canada then it is a Canadian trust and tax is payable here and that would be a very dodgy scheme to get out of paying tax. Tax experts can tell us whether setting up shell trusts is avoidance or evasion....But the crucial point is that the CRA needs to investigate and Trudeau's dismissal of the issues was very problematic. How on earth can he say that he is satisfied when no investigation has been conducted?
[EX A]: Non-identity-attack

[EX Q]: Comment: Right on Comrade! Burn it down! Burn it ALL down!!! No more Press! No more voting! Then we can rebuild a new swamp from scratch using straw..and sticks...and bricks! One deplorable nation governed by deplorable leaders....wait...what?
[EX A]:
Non-identity-attack