Question: Sentence A: Horse races were held here in the 1780s, and also five World Fairs between 1867 and 1937.

Sentence B: The area was built over with dense apartments and factories by the late 1800s.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question: 'This is one of those crimes they actually give a damn about,' I hissed.
I actually care about this.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Problem: Here is a premise:
Queen Elizabeth II of Great Britain is represented in New Zealand by the Governor-General.

Here is a hypothesis:
The Governor-General represents the queen in New Zealand.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Sentence 1: It believes the criteria would be better applied to the full rate production decision or when low rate production quantities extend beyond 10 percent of the planned weapon system buy.

Sentence 2: The quantities never exceed ten percent of the buy.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: no

Question:
I see a future for elderly male actors willing to shed their clothes for laughs, but I don't see myself in the audience.

Does it follow that "Elderly male actors shedding their clothes for laughs is not something I'd see, unless they were extremely good looking,"?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
it is not possible to tell

Question:
Based on the premise "These officers must have sufficient knowledge of the automated systems in order to carry out their responsibilities effectively.", can we conclude that "The officers need zero knowledge of the system "? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
no