TASK DEFINITION: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.
PROBLEM: Comment: Durango?!? I'm ambivalent about Amazon picking Denver but please don't destroy the smaller towns in the state. Durango would become unrecognizable if they were sucked into the Amazon orbit.

SOLUTION: Non-sexual-explicit

PROBLEM: Comment: Wow Icon you are one sick puppy! Killing another human isn't a privacy issue and opposing it isn't something just limited to Christians. Every decent human being with a moral compass opposes terminating the life of another for the sake of convenience. Take a close look at which direction abortion laws have been going over the last 20 years and prepare yourself for the day that killing your own child will no longer be an option.

SOLUTION: Non-sexual-explicit

PROBLEM: Comment: Its not about returning to the days when you could call anybody anything. If the shoe fits, you wear it. OK, let the semantics begin with you. In today's politically correct climate you can call a Immoral, Promiscuous, Nasty Woman a: Escort, Lady of the evening, Friend with privileges, demimonde, sex worker, Prostitute, Professional in Public Relations, and it slides by and nobody riots in the streets, protests, or calls you a jerk. However, you call them a "HO", and lookout, the loud mouths crank it up. You are what you are, whether its politically correct or not, accept the facts and truth.

As far as the bathroom issue, I believe a human with a penis should use the mens bathroom. A human with a vagina should use the womans bathroom.

SOLUTION:
Sexual-explicit