In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.
One example is below.
Q: Comment: President lied under oath about consensual sex...
Not the same thing as rape.
A: Sexual-explicit
Rationale: This comment explicitly mentions "consensual sex" and "rape", and thus is sexual-explicit.
Q: Comment: A social justice facilitator? Huh? Maybe you should be on SNL....a comedy routine....

Sigh...Another whites are bad ( and especially white heterosexual males ) humorless sermon. Yawn. It is very tiresome. I think what you are seeing in North America is the birth of what a CNN commentator called a whitelash and this trend scares the left. People like me are growing irritated at the constant focus of leftists and their supporters in the media on identity politics. You can't open a newspaper without a story on natives, Black Lives Matter, LGBQT or whatever. Do families still exist in Canada as far as the media is concerned?

I know it irritates leftists like Ross but if you do the analytics on a global basis ( look at the data) you will see that whites ( and especially white males) control most of the world's wealth and governments.....this is not racist it is a hard fact. And that situation is unlikely to change.....
A:
Non-sexual-explicit