Question:
Based on the premise "Fitz Park itself is a fine example of the philanthropic attitude of the Victorians, who created green spaces in almost every town for the people to enjoy.", can we conclude that "The Victorians removed all green spaces from almost every town."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
no

Question: Sentence A: The rule also appears subject to section 205 of the Act, relating to consideration of regulatory alternatives.

Sentence B: The consideration of regulatory alternatives, which is a part of section 205 of the Act, also has an impact on the rule.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Question: uh we're supposed to be talking about houses though right well i run the business in my home
I am not responsible for running any business.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Problem: Here is a premise:
Not got a sort of kindly feeling for one another?

Here is a hypothesis:
It appears you two hate each other.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Sentence 1: 15These fiscal policy simulations do not reflect other federal commitments and responsibilities not fully recognized in the federal budget, including the costs of federal insurance programs, clean-up costs from federal operations resulting in hazardous wastes, and the demand for new investment to modernize deteriorating or obsolete physical infrastructure (e.g.

Sentence 2: The fiscal policy simulations reflects everything in the budget.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: no

Premise:
"However, the nature of these Federal physical assets that are classified as stewardship PP and E differ from general PP and E in that their values may be indeterminable or may have little meaning (for example, museum collections, monuments, assets acquired in the formation of the nation) or that allocating the cost of such assets (for example, military weapons systems and space exploration hardware) to accounting periods that benefit from the ownership of such assets is meaningless."
Hypothesis: It is meaningless to allocate the costs of assets like these.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
yes