Q: If The paper was safe where it was; since no one had thought of looking there in the first week, it was not likely they would do so afterwards. , can we say that "Because it had not occurred to anyone to look there during the first seven days, there was very little chance that they would look there at any point after that. "?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A: yes

Premise:
"um-hum so it seems like a of people live there and through appeals because i know they do frequently i mean they cover cover it pretty heavily on television and the newspaper"
Hypothesis: It seems like a lot of people live there, and through appeals because I know they do that frequently.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

yes

input question: The left-wing parties re?spond?ed by banding together in a Popular Front, which the Socialists led to power in 1936. If this premise is true, does that tell us:"The left-wing responded by joining together to make a massive army."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: it is not possible to tell

Question:
Based on the premise "so you know you never know", can we conclude that "You won't know until you do it."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
it is not possible to tell

Question: Sentence A: we got here at the end of about a four year drought uh we've had a whole lot of rain uh it's been raining pretty much continually now uh off and on maybe one day of break for about a month

Sentence B: It's been raining nearly everyday for a month.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Question: Sentence A: Second, Congress provided EPA with a tool to achieve this reduction - - an innovative market-based allowance trading program.

Sentence B: Congress gave EPA a ways to reduce carbon emissions.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer:
it is not possible to tell