TASK DEFINITION: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
PROBLEM: Thought in all of the wisdom by those on the road system, they shut down all the bars of the Ferry's

SOLUTION: No

PROBLEM: Wish this information from your January 14th article had been brought forward to this update:

" This year's policy debate topic focuses on domestic surveillance by the federal government. For half of their rounds, debaters are assigned to argue for reducing surveillance. During the other half, debaters will argue for maintaining present levels of surveillance"

The subject of a debate should always be part of a real news story. Obviously, if it is extemporaneous debate, that isn't possible. Here, you had the information two months ago and just lost it between article and update.

SOLUTION: No

PROBLEM: Supposedly, HB 2960, which established this program provides that "(n) Provide that the State of Oregon and employers that participate in the plan have no proprietary interest in the contributions to or earnings on amounts contributed to accounts established under the plan."

Of course, that is a Legislative Law; they can change it any time Senator Prozanski or Representative Barnhart or any other Democrat decides that they need more money for one of their programs; they are in the Majority and can just slap the Emergency Clause on new Legislation anytime they feel like it and do whatever they please because the Republicans have no say and the people can't do an Initiative to stop them.

SOLUTION:
Yes