In this task, you are given music product reviews in English language. The goal is to classify the review as "POS" if the overall sentiment of the review is positive or as "NEG" if the overall sentiment of the review is negative.
--------
Question: Not for Audiophiles . If you're not anal about sound quality then please skip this review. That said, this DTS disc sounds terrible. Why? 1- If you're even vaguely familiar with this album or the songs, you will hardly recognize them here. The multi-channel mix is way out of phase from the original stereo mix; in other words, they sound totally different from each other. 2- This disc doesn't have the fidelity of the SONY re-mastered Abraxas. The tape hiss is very noticeable, and the overall sound is very dull. Just compare this disc with the newer re-mastered version and you will hear the difference immediatley. Save your money and "maybe" someday SONY will release a multi-channel SACD from the same source as the rather excellent re-mastered cd

Answer: NEG

Question: very hard . unlike other more chill travis discs like "the man who" and "invisible band," this cd is really pretty heavy. I gave the cd away to a buddy of mine who likes hard rock and he loves it. This is not a cd to put on and relax to

Answer: NEG

Question: NOT ELEVATOR MUSIC! . After listening to this CD a couple times, I will be keeping it on my iPod playlist for some time. It will come in quite handy when I want to drown out the voices of people with "single phase" minds! Yes, it is supposed to be relaxing! Comparing this to Muzak is nothing short of ignorant! On a better note, I would tend to agree that Peter White is creative when it comes to mixing up his sound with other artists. Yet another reason to really appreciate the jazz community. If you are a Peter White fan, you will not be let down.

Answer:
POS