Definition: In this task, you will be shown a prompt from a judicial decision and multiple holding statements derived from citations following text in a legal decision. Holdings represent the governing legal rule when the law is applied to a particular set of facts. There are five answer choices for each citing text. The correct answer is the holding statement that corresponds to the citing text. The four incorrect answers are other holding statements. You should find the correct option. There is a <HOLDING> token in the position of the citing text prompt where the holding statement was extracted.
Input: that an impartial jury cannot be obtained in such county."); OCGA 17-2-2 (a). 15 Jones, 272 Ga. at 901 (2); accord Muldrow v. St hat State failed to prove venue when only evidence presented was that murder victim's neighbor that defendant abandoned majority of his ineffective assistance claims by making only conclusory arguments and failing to support such argument with citations to authority). 31 Tyner, 313 Ga. App. at 564 (6) (a) (punctuation omitted); see Perdue v. State, 298 Ga. 841, 845 (3) (785 SE2d 291) (2016) (noting that it is well established that the decision as to which defense witnesses to call is a matter of trial strategy and tactics). 32 Tyner, 313 Ga. App. at 564 (6) (a) (punctuation omitted). 33 See Mattox v. State, 305 Ga. App. 600, 606 (3) (699 SE2d 887) (2010) (<HOLDING>). 34 Davenport v. State, 308 Ga. App. 140, 154
Holding statements: (A) holding that counsels failure to impeach a witness by showing bias was ineffective assistance (B) holding witnesss business address even though witnesss middle name omitted enough information because party could locate witness (C) holding that the defendants due process rights were violated when the trial judge singled out the only defense witness and indicated to that witness that he expected the witness to he and would personally ensure that the witness was prosecuted for perjury and thereby effectively drove that witness off the stand (D) holding that trial counsels inability to locate witness did not constitute ineffective assistance when defendant only knew witnesss first name and the apartment complex where he believed the witness lived (E) holding that defendant is under an obligation to give the government notice of an alibi witness even if defendant is unable to locate the witness
Output:
(D)