instruction:
In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.
question:
Comment: I've had a few ex military friends say they would join the men wearing flannel before they ever shot killed American citizens. Remember this term: "all threats, foreign and DOMESTIC" ever consider our own president as a threat? OH CRAP....I think the cigarette smoking man from The X-Files is sitting in a car outside my apartment I better shut up.
answer:
Obscene

question:
Comment: JZ...good, for a second it was hard telling what subject you were debating...the rights of minors or adults. Many often forget in this discussion that BASED IN FACT, A person's brain doesn't near full development, or able to process FACTS to the best of their ability until their brain is fully developed post adolescence, depending upon how stimulated their brain growth has been, while growing up...both positively and negatively.

Getting slightly off topic, this is what scares the hell out of so many people. Every day, Trump seems paranoid. Every day, TICPGPGPOTUS seems defensive. He is secretive. He hides a lot, while preaching ethical goodness sermons every day. And yet, he still CAN release his tax returns, but he won't. The big surprise(s), they must be doozies!!! Child like brains, like his, never seem to ever learn that children get caught. And when some do, there is no telling what they will do...scary. Something wrong with tRump child brain.
answer:
Non-obscene

question:
Comment: One would think that Adventists who are liberal in the classical sense (I include myself in that category) rather than progressively liberal would appreciate the importance of keeping church and state separate. But when your political beliefs take on the characteristics of religious values, and you start using the Bible to support those values, the distinction is pretty tough to see and maintain.

This dangerous proclivity is conservative in the sense that political powers tend to stamp out religion as a source of legitimate authority and/or invoke religious symbols to reinforce their values. Those who seek radical transformation sound quite liberal until they have succeeded. Then they become quite repressive and conservative when the roots and fruits of what they have planted are threatened.

Does anyone think for a second that, if liberals were in charge of the G.C. non-ordination of women would be an policy option anywhere in the world church? Not a chance!
answer:
Non-obscene