Question: Sentence A: 21 Below the golden rule rate, saving and investing more today permits increased consumption.

Sentence B: Saving and investing money raises the rate of consumption of disposable goods.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question: The private savings necessary to finance the deficit will plummet, because there will be net withdrawals from private pension funds.
The deficit is financed by private savings.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Problem: Here is a premise:
Toobin is, of course, being massively hypocritical here, given that he too is now profiting from enclosing his reporting in hard covers.

Here is a hypothesis:
He does not care how he makes his money.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Sentence 1: The Appeals court job changed their plans to settle in Lansing, halfway between here and Saginaw, where she grew up.

Sentence 2: She was wanting to work for the court.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question:
um-hum yeah yes they're the they're the victims of neglect and and uh many years of of perpetuated nonconcern for human life

Does it follow that "They are victims of years of neglect, and non-concern for human life."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
yes

Question:
Based on the premise "But to a man with a hammer everything looks like a nail.", can we conclude that "A man who wants to attack sees a target everywhere he looks."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
yes