In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence can be inferred from the statement. Incorrect choices change the meaning in important ways or have details that are not mentioned in the statement. Indicate your answer as 1,2, or 3 corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

Example Input: Statement: That's why the chief food technician in the leading dairy cooperative in the country was reclining behind a giant mixing vat and desperately wanted to forget about the negative stimuli on his nerve cells caused by the 83 kilograms of his body. Choices: 1. A chief food technician is the most important profession in a dairy cooperative. 2. The chief food technician wants to remember the positive stimuli that was caused from his body. 3. The chief food technician has 83 kilograms of his body causing negative stimuli.
Example Output: 3

Example Input: Statement: The lion, symbol of power and pride, was an understandable choice as the emblem of India's regained nationhood in 1947. Choices: 1. The symbol of pride for India is a caterpillar. 2. The symbol of pride could be a line can be seen as an understandable choice for India's regained nationhood in 1947. 3. It is quite understandable why the lion is established as India's regained nationhood in 1947.
Example Output: 3

Example Input: Statement: Part of recognizing that Touch of Evil is a masterpiece means also recognizing that it's often suffocatingly unpleasant, and that Welles is working off his aggression for the vast, trash-movie audience that he hoped to attract. Choices: 1. Part of that Touch of Evil is recognizing that it's often suffocatingly unpleasant. 2. There are no parts needed to recognize that Touch Of Evil is a masterpiece. 3. Welles is working off his aggression by punching a punching bag.
Example Output:
1