In this task, you are given text for US Congressional and California state bills, your task is to generate a summary for this bill.

Ex Input:
SECTION 1. ENCOURAGING THE PREPARATION OF TANF RECIPIENTS FOR HIGH-
SKILL, HIGH-DEMAND JOBS.

(a) In General.--Section 407(c)(2)(D) of the Social Security Act
(42 U.S.C. 607(c)(2)(D)) is amended to read as follows:
''(D) Limitation on number of persons who may be
treated as engaged in work by reason of participation
in educational activities.--
''(i) In general.--Except as provided in
clause (ii), for purposes of paragraphs
(1)(B)(i) and (2)(B) of subsection (b), not
more than 30 percent of the number of
individuals in all families in a State who are
treated as engaged in work for a month may
consist of individuals who are--
''(I) determined to be engaged in
work for the month by reason of
participation in vocational educational
training (but only with respect to such
training that does not exceed 12 months
with respect to any individual); or
''(II) deemed to be engaged in work
for the month by reason of subparagraph
(C) of this paragraph.
''(ii) Exception for education in
preparation for sector-specific, high-skill
occupations to meet employer demand.--
''(I) In general.--Notwithstanding
clause (i) and subsection (d)(8), for
purposes of determining monthly
participation rates under paragraphs
(1)(B)(i) and (2)(B) of subsection (b)
with respect to an individual who is
enrolled, in preparation for a sector-
specific, high-skill occupation to meet
employer demand (as defined in
subclause (II)), in a postsecondary 2-
or 4-year degree program or in
vocational educational training--
''(aa) the State may count
the number of hours per week
that the individual attends
such program or training for
purposes of determining the
number of hours for which a
family is engaged in work for
the month without regard to the
30 percent limitation under
clause (i); and
''(bb) the individual shall
be permitted to complete the
requirements of the degree
program or vocational
educational training within the
normal time frame for full-time
students seeking the particular
degree or completing such
vocational educational
training.
''(II) Sector-specific, high-skill
occupation to meet employer demand
defined.--In subclause (I), the term
'sector-specific, high-demand, high-
skill occupation to meet employer
demand' means an occupation--
''(aa) that has been
identified by the State
workforce investment board
established under section 111
of the Workforce Investment Act
of 1998 (29 U.S.C. 2821) as
within the needs of the State
with regard to current and
projected employment
opportunities in specific
industry sectors or that has
been defined by the State
agency administering the State
program funded under this part
as within the needs of the
State with regard to current
and projected employment
opportunities in specific
industry sectors and is
consistent with high demand
jobs identified in the State
plan in accordance with section
402(a)(1)(A)(vii);
''(bb) that requires
occupational training; and
''(cc) that provides a wage
of at least 75 percent of the
State median hourly wage, as
calculated by the Bureau of
Labor Statistics on the basis
of the most recent Occupational
Employment and Wage Survey.''.
(b) Conforming State Plan Amendment.--Section 402(a)(1)(B) of the
Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 602(a)(1)(B)) is amended by adding at
the end the following:
''(vii) The document shall describe any
strategies and programs the State plans to use
to address employment placement, retention, and
advancement for recipients of assistance under
the program, including placement into high-
demand jobs and whether such jobs are
identified using labor market information.''.
(c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section take
effect on October 1, 2005.

Ex Output:
Revises the mandatory work requirements of part A (Temporary Assistance for Needy Families) (TANF) of title IV of the Social Security Act with respect to the limitation on the number of persons in a state who may be treated as engaged in work by reason of participation in educational activities. Removes two-parent families from the formula for such limitation. Creates an exception to the limitation for education in preparation for sector-specific, high-skill occupations to meet employer demand.

Defines sector-specific, high-demand, high-skill occupation to meet employer demand as an occupation that: (1) has been identified by the state workforce investment board or by the state agency administering the state TANF program as within state needs with regard to current and projected employment opportunities in specific industry sectors; (2) requires occupational training; and (3) provides a wage of at least 75 percent of the state median hourly wage.

Ex Input:
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ''Vaccinate America's Children through
Complete Information & Education Act of 2015''.

SEC. 2. ENCOURAGING STATES TO STRENGTHEN ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES
RELATED TO NONMEDICAL EXEMPTIONS FROM STATE VACCINATION
REQUIREMENTS.

(a) In General.--Section 1928 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C.
1396s) is amended--
(1) by redesignating subsection (h) as subsection (i); and
(2) by inserting after subsection (g) the following new
subsection:
''(h) Administrative Procedures for Granting Nonmedical
Exemptions.--
''(1) Certification of adoption of procedures.--
''(A) In general.--A State program under this
section does not comply with the requirements of this
section unless the State certifies to the Secretary
that the State has established administrative
procedures for granting nonmedical exemptions from
State immunization requirements (as defined in
subparagraph (B)) that include at least 2 of the
prerequisites described in paragraph (2).
''(B) Nonmedical exemption from state immunization
requirement.--For purposes of this subsection, the term
'nonmedical exemption from State immunization
requirements' means any exemption from a State law that
requires a child to receive a pediatric vaccine
(including school immunization requirements) that is
not based on a medical reason.
''(2) Nonmedical exemption prerequisites.--The
prerequisites for granting a nonmedical exemption from State
immunization requirements described in this paragraph are the
following:
''(A) The State requires that prior to the
exemption being granted, a parent or guardian seeking a
nonmedical exemption from State immunization
requirements for a child shall discuss the consequences
of nonvaccination with the child's pediatrician or
other primary care provider and that the discussion is
noted in the child's medical record.
''(B) The State requires that prior to the
exemption being granted, a parent or guardian seeking a
nonmedical exemption from State immunization
requirements for a child read and sign a form that
discusses the risks of nonvaccination and submits the
form to the State.
''(C) The State requires that prior to the
exemption being granted, a parent or guardian seeking a
nonmedical exemption from State immunization
requirements for a child submits to the State a
notarized letter describing the parent's or guardian's
reasons for seeking the exemption.
''(D) The State requires that all nonmedical
exemptions from State immunization requirements shall
only be granted for a 1-year period and shall be
required to be renewed annually if a parent or guardian
of a child wants the exemption to continue for another
year.
''(3) Penalty.--
''(A) In general.--With respect to a fiscal year,
if a State fails to submit the certification required
under paragraph (1) or if the administrative procedures
established by the State for granting nonmedical
exemptions from State immunization requirements do not
include at least 2 of the prerequisites described in
paragraph (2), the State shall pay the Secretary an
amount equal to--
''(i) in the case of a State that is not a
manufacturer of pediatric vaccines, 5 percent
of the value (as determined by the Secretary)
of the vaccines provided to the State under
subsection (b)(2)(A) for that fiscal year; and
''(ii) in the case of a State that is a
manufacturer of pediatric vaccines, 5 percent
of the sum of--
''(I) the value (as determined by
the Secretary) of any vaccines provided
to the State under subsection (b)(2)(A)
for that fiscal year; and
''(II) the amount paid to the State
for the fiscal year under subsection
(b)(2)(C).
''(B) Treatment as an overpayment.--A State payment
required to be made to the Secretary under subparagraph
(A) shall be deemed an overpayment to the State under
this title to be disallowed against the State's regular
quarterly draw for all spending under section
1903(d)(2). Such a disallowance is not subject to a
reconsideration under section 1116(e).''.
(b) Conforming Amendments.--
(1) Section 1928 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C.
1396s), as amended by subsection (a), is further amended--
(A) in subsection (a)(1)(A), by striking
''subsection (h)(8)'' and inserting ''subsection
(i)(8)''; and
(B) in subsection (b)(2)(A)(iv), by striking
''subsection (h)(3)'' and inserting ''subsection
(i)(3)''.
(2) Section 609(d) of the Employee Retirement Income
Security Act of 1974 (42 U.S.C. 1169(d)) is amended by striking
''section 1928(h)(6)'' and inserting ''section 1928(i)(6)''.
(c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this Act shall take
effect on the date that is 1 year after the date of the enactment of
this Act.

Ex Output:
Vaccinate America's Children through Complete Information & Education Act of 2015 This bill amends title XIX (Medicaid) of the Social Security Act to require a state to certify that it has established, in its pediatric vaccine distribution program, administrative procedures regarding nonmedical exemptions from state immunization requirements. These procedures must include at least two of the following prerequisites for granting a nonmedical exemption: the child's parent or guardian shall discuss the consequences of nonvaccination with the child's primary care provider, as noted in the child's medical record; the child's parent or guardian shall read, sign, and submit to the state a form discussing the risks of nonvaccination; the child's parent of guardian shall submit to the state a notarized letter describing why the exemption is being sought; or all medical exemptions shall be granted for only a one-year period and shall be required to be renewed annually only if the child's parent or guardian wants the exemption to continue for another year. A state that does not comply with these requirements is subject to a monetary penalty.

Ex Input:
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ''Pakistan Terrorism Accountability
Act of 2012''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

Congress finds the following:
(1) Pakistan, through the Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI)
organization, maintains control and influence in Afghanistan
through militant Islamic networks, such as the Haqqani Network,
in order to secure its strategic position and expand its sphere
of influence, not only in Afghanistan, but also in Kashmir and
against India.
(2) A 2011 report published by the Combating Terrorism
Center at West Point states that during the 1980s: ''[T]he
Pakistani state has long been a core sponsor and beneficiary of
the Haqqani network. During the 1980s Jalaluddin [Haqqani]
quickly rose to be one of the ISI's most favored field
commanders and the support he provided would have a significant
impact upon Pakistan's security establishment and the jihad in
Kashmir in the years to follow . . . Yet, Pakistan's favored
Afghan proxy is also the very same actor that has served as al-
Qaida's primary local enabler for over two decades. Given the
ISI's historical sponsorship of the Haqqani network, it is
highly unlikely that Pakistan has not been aware of this
history.''.
(3) The Government of Pakistan, including the ISI
Directorate, has long supported the Haqqani Network, including
by supporting the following:
(A) Attacks on the United States Embassy in Kabul
and NATO Headquarters on September 12, 2011.
(B) Attack on the Combat Post Sayed Abad, Wardak
Province, Afghanistan, on September 10, 2011.
(C) Attack on the Hotel-Intercontinental Kabul on
June 28, 2011.
(D) Attack on the Kabul Bank on February 19, 2011.
(E) Continued attacks on United States-funded road
construction projects across Afghanistan.
(F) Attack on Forward Operating Base Chapman on
December 30, 2009.
(G) Attack on Forward Operating Base Salerno on May
13, 2009.
(H) Attack on the Khost Governor's office on May
12, 2009.
(I) Attack on Forward Operating Base Salerno on May
13, 2009.
(J) Attacks on the Afghan Ministries of Justice,
Education, and Prison Directorate on February 11, 2009.
(K) Attack on the Germany Embassy in Kabul in
January 2009.
(L) Attack on Afghan Intelligence Headquarters,
Khost, in December 2008.
(M) Kidnapping of journalist David Rohde on
November 10, 2008.
(N) Bombing of the Indian Embassy in Kabul on July
7, 2008.
(O) Assassination attempt on Hamid Karzai on April
27, 2008.
(P) Kidnapping of British journalist Sean Langan in
March 2008.
(Q) Attack on Sabari district center in Khost on
March 3, 2008.
(R) Attack on Kabul Serena Hotel on January 14,
2008.
(4) On September 17, 2011, the Voice of America reported
that ''The United States has suspected Pakistan's intelligence
agency has ties to the Haqqani network and other militant
groups in Afghanistan but rarely says so publicly. The U.S. and
NATO have blamed the Haqqani network for attacks on U.S. and
NATO troops and on U.S. targets, including the September 13
strike against the U.S. Embassy in Kabul.''.
(5) Former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Admiral
Mike Mullen, stated that ''with ISI support, Haqqani operatives
planned and conducted that truck bomb attack, as well as the
assault on our embassy [in September 2011] . . . We also have
credible evidence that they were behind the June 28th attack
against the Inter-Continental Hotel in Kabul and a host of
other smaller but effective operations.''. Mullen continued
''the Haqqani network acts as a veritable arm of Pakistan's
Inter-Services Intelligence agency.''.
(6) Admiral Mike Mullen was quoted in Dawn, a major English
language newspaper in Pakistan, that ''It's fairly well known
that the ISI has a longstanding relationship with the Haqqani
network . . . Haqqani is supporting, funding, training fighters
that are killing Americans and killing coalition partners.''.
(7) On April 19, 2012, the Associated Press reported that
the United States Ambassador to Afghanistan, Ryan Crocker,
stated that there is ''no question'' that the Haqqani network
was behind this week's brazen attacks on Kabul and other
eastern cities and said Pakistan needs to do more to clamp down
on the group's safe havens and that ''There is no question in
our mind that the Haqqanis were responsible for these
attacks.''. Crocker also stated that ''We know where their
leadership lives and we know where these plans are made.
They're not made in Afghanistan. They're made in Miram Shah,
which is in North Waziristan, which is in Pakistan.''.

SEC. 3. STATEMENT OF POLICY.

It shall be the policy of the United States to limit United States
foreign assistance to Pakistan if Pakistan's military or intelligence
services continue to support or provide assistance to organizations
that target United States citizens.

SEC. 4. LIMITATION ON UNITED STATES FOREIGN ASSISTANCE TO PAKISTAN.

(a) Limitation.--Of the amounts made available for assistance to
Pakistan for fiscal year 2013 or any subsequent fiscal year, the
President shall withhold $50,000,000 for each United States citizen who
is killed as a result of actions of Pakistan's Inter-Services
Intelligence (ISI) or support provided by the ISI to other
organizations or individuals, including the Haqqani Network.
(b) Certification.--The Secretary of Defense shall, not later than
the first day of each month of the fiscal years described in subsection
(a), certify to Congress the number of United States citizens who,
during the immediately preceding month, have been killed as a result of
actions or support described in subsection (a).
(c) Fund.--Amounts withheld pursuant to subsection (a) shall,
notwithstanding any other provision of law, be administered by the
Department of Defense and made available on an equitable basis to
provide payments to survivors of United States citizens described in
subsection (a).

Ex Output:
Pakistan Terrorism Accountability Act of 2012 - States that it shall be U.S. policy to limit U.S. foreign assistance to Pakistan if Pakistan's military or intelligence services continue to support or provide assistance to organizations that target U.S. citizens.

Directs the President to withhold $50 million from amounts made available for Pakistan for FY2013 or any subsequent fiscal year for each U.S. citizen who is killed as a result of actions of Pakistan's Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) or support provided by ISI to other organizations or individuals, including the Haqqani Network (an insurgent network operating in Pakistan and Afghanistan).