Here is an email: As I mentioned in my previous e-mail, on October 17 Dynegy filed a complaint against ComEd. This proceeding may be of particular interest to Enron given EES's plans to offer physical delivery in Illinois in early 2002. I've outlined Dynegy's principal arguments below. Dynegy requested fast-track processing, so any intervention and comments we file are due Friday, Oct. 26. In order to file a timely intervention (and meaningful comments, if we decide to comment), I need to know your thoughts on this as soon as possible. Elizabeth and Harlan, I'm copying you because I would especially like to know what you think of Dynegy's characterization of the Firm LD product. Main argument: Dynegy challenges ComEd's published Business Practice that allows "marketer firm" (Firm LD) contracts to be designated as Network Resources. Dynegy argues that this practice conflicts with the OATT provisions that 1) Network Resources are generation "owned, purchased or leased by the Network Customer designated to serve Network Load," and 2) a Network Customer "must demonstrate that it owns or has committed to purchase generation pursuant to an executed contract" in order to designate a Network Resource. Dynegy's theory on why Firm LD should not be a Network Resource: - permits designation of network resources that are committed for sale to others, creating reliability problems - Firm LD under the EEI contract is not capacity-backed, nor is it a commitment to purchase generation - allows transmission customers to get the advantage of generation capacity without actually paying the cost of that capacity - since retail providers are allowed to rely on "over-the-counter" firm instead of securing long-term contracts, adequate reserves are not being carried to serve retail load Dynegy claims that ComEd's practice has deprived DMG of payments for capacity and the ability to earn revenues for capacity properly designated as network resources. It cites specific instances in which ComEd has accepted transmission reservation requests from New Energy and Cilco in which these parties designated Illinois Power as a network resource, when only a Firm LD contracts were in place with IP.
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: Dynegy vs. ComEd (EL02-6) -- further info
Here is an email: Reagan, I've requested the issuance of a draft master (gas) for Clarksdale. Yazoo has theirs in hand, but I haven't heard any of any comments. The power side is a bit more complicated. Yazoo City and Clarksdale have not cut a deal between them to determine how to buy power - whether it should be bought by MDEA (easier in some accounting respects, but credit is more of an issue) or by the individual Cities. Maybe this should be on the list for our 300 meeting. Kay
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: MDEA masters
Here is an email: ADS FILE FINDER Document Management and Imaging Software for home & small business use. It lets you convert important documents into digital images, index each one for easy access and file them on the hard disk of your computer and/or CD Rom. The software is a windows application and extremely user friendly. It accepts digital cameras, scanners, CD Rom, disk, or computer files as input sources. Benefits Include: Organization !!! No More Paper Clutter or Misplaced Documents. Instant Access to Years of Tax,Insurance and Warranty Receipts. Serial Numbers & Proof of Ownership Should Theft or Disaster Occur. Secure environment for your irreplaceable family photos. Great way to organize all those favorite recipes. ORDER TODAY! Please visit our web site for system requirements and additional features! CLICK HERE Don't Delay. This Is A Limited Time Offer At This Amazing Low Price! Reg. $99.95 now only $79.95 We apologize for any email you may have inadvertently received Please CLICK HERE to be removed from future mailings.
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A:
HATE TO FILE? WE HAVE A SOLUTION..... 6692