Premise:
"Jon had seen the best musketeers fall and cowards survive duels with masters lying in the dirt."
Hypothesis: The cowards were still good fighters, regardless of their cowardice.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

it is not possible to tell

input question: I oh, dash it all, Tuppence, you know! If this premise is true, does that tell us:"Tuppence, I, dash it all, you know what!"?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: yes

Question:
Based on the premise "States will be required to develop plans for these areas.", can we conclude that "The States don't put much thought into these plans. "? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
it is not possible to tell

Question: Sentence A: More recently, several new, long-term studies have been published that use improved approaches and appear to be consistent with the earlier body of literature.

Sentence B: Most researchers are in agreement that the new, long-term studies are providing invaluable information.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question: concludes that the preemption requirement of the final rule is necessary for the national organ sharing system to be effective across state lines.
The requirement for the final rule will help the organ sharing system to be most effective.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Problem: Here is a premise:
The papers, of course, had been full of the tragedy.

Here is a hypothesis:
Reporters were hanging around for more stories.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer:
it is not possible to tell