Here is an email: I am familiar with one active case and one threatened litigation involving the companies on the Investment Portfolio list. Steel Dynamics has been sued for securities fraud involving the NSM transaction. Cgas has been threatened with litigation by Jerry Jordan, the former CEO. Jerry Jordan disagrees with Cgas' evaluation of the stock he retained (which is subject to a buyout provision). We think it is worth +/- 500,000. He thinks it is worth +/- 1.5 million.
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: Investment Portfolio
Q: Just to follow-up on our discussion yesterday regarding the accounting treatment assuming that USTeleNet owns the switch and that we purchase the switch and lease it back to them under a "capital" lease, the following would occur: The asset would stay on their books (however it would be "marked-up" to FMV as evidenced by the purchase price) They would defer the gain, if any, over the asset's life. They would record a payable on their balance sheet and recognize interest expense in their P&L as payments are made We would record the payment of cash to them and book a receivable and deferred interest income (to be recognized over the lease term) Essentially we are lending them money equal to the FMV of their asset and receiving interest payments in return (i.e. direct financing lease) I would be happy to go into more detail at your request. Please let me know as issues develop and I will assist as necessary. Regards,
Propose a subject line
A: USTeleNet Transaction
IN: I tried to fax all 4 deal sheets at once - and the pages stuck together. So I faxed each page seperately. Nice outfit. Judy says "Hey".

Generate a subject line.

OUT: Fax
IN: This is an email
Marie - ONEOK Energy Marketing and Trading Company, L.P. is interested in possibly pursuing a master netting agreement. Can you please send them the latest form of agreement for their counsel to review? The contact there is Don Dunkelberger, Credit Manager. Email: ddunkelberger@oneok.com Thanks,

What is the subject?

OUT: Master Netting general form: ONEOK Energy Marketing and Trading Company
QUESTION: Curricular Review Task Force (CRTF) Report # 9 (October 1, 2001) The Curriculum Review Task Force held its first meeting for the academic year on August 23, 2001. We reviewed the work done last May to tie up loose ends and to plan the work for the year. During the intensive work sessions in the last week of May, the eight faculty members of the Task Force (including the Chair) had made detailed presentations to our group on eight topics related to the Curriculum Review (Please see my last report for details). It was decided that these members would write a summary of their presentations, including their cited references, and circulate them to the other members of the Task Force. After reviewing these summaries, and remembering the strategic curricular initiatives collectively decided on by our faculty and staff during the Purser-Gans Conference, each Task Force member was asked to come up with five Educational Goals which would guide our future work. Meanwhile, it had been decided in consultation with the Faculty Senate that the Fall Faculty/Staff Conference would focus on the Curricular Review. The Task Force had decided last May that the first two curricular initiatives to be considered are (1) Reinvestment in Pedagogy and (2) Communication Across the Curriculum. These two topics became the key themes for the Faculty/Staff Conference. The Task Force met with the Conference Planning Group on August 20 and it was agreed that the small group discussions will be led by seven Task Force members. The Faculty Conference held on August 23 was very productive in providing valuable input for the work of the Task Force. In a general sense the Conference gave a vote of confidence for the work and approach of the CRTF. We have taken detailed notes of the discussions in the small groups and the plenary session. On September 12th and 19th, the Task Force held intensive work sessions in the Boone House from 5:30 to 9:00 p.m. Each member, as agreed earlier, brought a list of five Educational Goals and after a lengthy discussion we have arrived at six educational goals and a list of operational ends for each of them. These goals focus on the competencies to be developed by our students and the learning outcomes of our academic program. After these are finalized, we will arrange an open meeting to discuss them with our faculty. On September 24, the Task Force met with the Assessment Committee and Dr. Susan Holm, Chair of the MFL department. The Assessment Committee discussed with us its plans and the list of eight Assessment Review Questions prepared by the Committee. Dr. Holm discussed the role of foreign language learning in the liberal arts education, the recent changes in MFL majors/minors/concentration and her department=s plans for further changes. The details of these discussions will be available in our minutes which will be posted in the public folders later this week. To access this folder, please go to Public Folders, All Public Folders, Documents, College, Curricular Review Task Force. We are planning to meet with other departments in the near future. Thanks. Raj Ambrose, Chair Curriculum Review Task Force.
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: Curricular Review Task Force Report #9
IN: hey everyone, just so you know, as of friday this week i am moving from the job here at exxonmobil to another contract here in town. they tell me this is a good thing. so, you can email me at: clayguinn@yahoo.com and call me at: cell, 7135048365 home, 7136623789 and, for the record, i will be out of the country next week, in sunny trinidad and tobago... yep, i've got a tough life. be careful out there everybody! clay

Generate a subject line.

OUT:
ins and outs