Problem: Here is a premise:
This rule amends existing rules and forms for domestic and foreign issuers to clarify and expand disclosure requirements for market risk sensitive instruments.

Here is a hypothesis:
There are no rules in place for disclosure requirements.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Sentence 1: Florida Big Bend

Sentence 2: A destination in a southern state.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: yes

Question:
yeah i read the book before so i knew the story line going in but they changed some things in the movie wasn't the same i thought the book was better than the movie but i thought the movie was really good as well

Does it follow that "The movie was almost as good as the book it was adapted from and I knew what was going to happen it."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
yes

Q: If Among the arguments advanced in support of knocking down the Kingdome was one that especially resonated with any child of It had to be replaced because its roof was falling down., can we say that "One of the arguments advanced in support of knocking down the kingdoms."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A: yes

Premise:
"i've still got my Fandango album that one didn't get lost in college"
Hypothesis: I lost all my albums in college, including a Fandango.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

no

Sentence 1: (Is there really a pile of money?

Sentence 2: Is a lot of money really there?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer:
yes