Sentence 1: Rehashing his favorite subject of New York City police corruption, Lumet slaps together, they say, an implausible plot (a year after law school, an ex-cop becomes a crusading district attorney), formulaic characters (bad-ass drug dealer, idealistic liberal defense lawyer), and preachy moralizing.

Sentence 2: Lumet likes to discuss police corruption.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: yes

Question:
The metrics described here will generally be used after contract award, in order to assess how well the agency is managing the system development process.

Does it follow that "THe metrics are for before the contract award."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
no

Q: If These comments were reviewed and considered as discussed in the preamble to the final rule., can we say that "These comments were considered as part of the conclusion."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A: no

Premise:
"Asian-style restaurant, English pub, and a coffee shop."
Hypothesis: There's an African restaurant, a coffee shop, and an Irish pub.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

no

input question: The reasons are appropriate for the case study application, an issue of particular concern if a generalization of the findings is intended. If this premise is true, does that tell us:"There were no reasons for the case study application."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: no

Q: If i think that's kind of the key, can we say that "I believe that is the crucial part."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A:
yes