input question: Intoxication in a driver would certainly be considered an alcohol problem. If this premise is true, does that tell us:"If a driver is drunk, that is not necessarily an alcohol problem."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: no

Question:
Based on the premise "After FDA evaluates the comments received, makes any revisions, and receives final OMB approval for the information collection, FDA will announce in the Federal Register that approval and the effective date of the part of the regulations that relate to the information collection.", can we conclude that "The FDA will make an announcement after OMB approves the information collection."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
yes

Question: Sentence A: The Erlenborn Commission was authorized by a resolution of the Corporation's Board of Directors on November 16, 1998, to study the presence requirement in the Corporation's statutory restriction on the representation of eligible aliens.

Sentence B: The Board of Directors denied the resolution authorization.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question: She died during the battle," said Adrin.
Adrin explained that the woman was alive and well but on vacation for a while.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Problem: Here is a premise:
Nor have the rich maintained that audible indicator, that quasi-English, quasi-lockjawed accent that the swells all had in Depression-era movies.

Here is a hypothesis:
The accents in the Depression-era movies are gone.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Question:
Consistent evaluation across the models would determine if they actually make a difference.

Does it follow that "Models would be evaluated consistently."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
yes