Q: If He is the Mr. Magoo of scientific theory, genially oblivious to everything he can't or won't see (Daniel Mendelsohn, the New York Observer ). (In Slate , Steven Pinker praises the book., can we say that "He is oblivious to things he can't see and can't test."?

A: it is not possible to tell

Q: If They're also nice because they are not quite as blatant as breath mints but get the job done., can we say that "They are more subtle than breath mints, but still effective."?

A: yes

Q: If i thought yeah i thought that most Americans might not like it because you know of it's it's not that good of a quality film but i mean it's the meaning behind it that i liked, can we say that "I didn't think most people would like it because the film quality is bad but it has a good meaning and was heartwarming."?

A: it is not possible to tell

Q: If The preamble to the final rule discusses the comments which were received and the changes which were made to the rule based on such comments., can we say that "The comments and resulting changes were discussed in the preamble to the final rule."?

A:
yes