The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.

[EX Q]: Context: 'I don't have a problem with you having extra water. I'll give you all the water, if I can have all of the firewood.' 'I think that's more than fair. That only brings up the food to be divided. One of us is going to have to take less.' 'I'd be fine with taking less food. So, I would get 3 firewood, 1 food, and 0 water. Is that correct?'
Utterance: 'And I would get 0 firewood, 2 food and 3 water. That seems right to me.'
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: Context: 'Hm. Getting warmer. What do you need the most of? ' 'I need more water than the other options, you can keep 2 food and 2 firewood but 1 water' 'I also feel that water is the most important. How about I take all 3 water, and you can take 2 firewood, and 2 foods?'
Utterance: 'I think the fairest thing would be that you keep 1 water, 2 food, 2 firewood'
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: Context: 'That's true but we don't want to be dehydrated either since we have so many people haha. Here's my suggestion: 2 waters for me and 2 food items for you?' 'if u had hungry means what will u do. u need food. right. hehehe' 'I'm willing to give more food to you in exchange for more water since not everybody in my group eats a lot. How about this: I take 2 waters, 1 food, 1 firewood and you can get everything else?'
Utterance: 'ok i accept ur thoughts.sharing is good habit'
[EX A]:
No