Question:
Based on the premise "Hurricane Andrew, which leveled much of South Florida in 1992, raised further doubts as to whether FEMA was capable of responding to disasters.", can we conclude that "Hurricane Andrew hit Florida in 1943."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
no

Question: Sentence A: Given Wolff's transparent contempt for his industry, his business partners, his end users, and his colleagues--actually, everybody but his wife and Isaacson--it's a miracle he got as far in the Internet business as he did.

Sentence B: It is surprising Wolff has made any success in the internet business.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Question: But Spock's equivocations were not evasions.
The equivocations Spock presented were not evasions.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Problem: Here is a premise:
We're not proposing 27 pages of regulations of the Internet.

Here is a hypothesis:
We are not suggesting 27 pages of internet regulation.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Sentence 1: These improvements have not taken place because well-meaning people in the West have done anything to help--foreign aid, never large, has lately shrunk to virtually nothing.

Sentence 2: The improvements took place because of well-meaning people who provided foreign aid.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: no

Premise:
"The WP reports that, voting along racial lines, the Mississippi state Senate yesterday rejected a proposal to compensate relatives of those killed in the state in hate crimes during the civil rights era."
Hypothesis: Whether or not they should have been compensated is still under dispute.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
it is not possible to tell