In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence can be inferred from the statement. Incorrect choices change the meaning in important ways or have details that are not mentioned in the statement. Indicate your answer as 1,2, or 3 corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

[EX Q]: Statement: When you hear that despite the fact that he has economists who know better, the Justice Department's Joel Klein apparently either believes or chooses to claim that this case is about path dependence, you start to wonder. Choices: 1. Joel Klein is lying about the case, and it's obvious why. 2. Joel Klein's claim that the case is about path dependence is fully backed up by his economists. 3. Joel Klein says that this case is about path dependence, even though the economists who work for him know that isn't true.
[EX A]: 3

[EX Q]: Statement: A few years later, he developed a fascination with the comely Catherine Oxenberg, then starring in the TV show Dynasty . Salinger traveled to California and had shown up on the set, according to biographer Hamilton. Choices: 1. Salinger took a liking to Catherine Oxenburg when she starred in Dynasty. 2. Salinger never traveled to California in order to show up on a tv set. 3. Salinger liked Oxenberg's character more than Oxenberg herself.
[EX A]: 1

[EX Q]: Statement: Stores do not open until 10am or later, but shopping goes on into the evening, up to 9:30pm. Choices: 1. Stores do not open very early due to the need to restock and prepare for shoppers. 2. Shops aren't open until around 10am, but you can shop up to 9:30pm. 3. Stores close early around 6 pm.
[EX A]:
2