Problem: Here is a premise:
But there will be a lot--a lot --more of them.

Here is a hypothesis:
There will be many of them

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Sentence 1: i could sure tell the difference though after the first year or so of being there uh prior to

Sentence 2: The disparity had always been there, but grew more and more distinct as time passed.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question:
uh all around Dallas there are a lot of recycling centers where you can take things sometimes for money um but most of those are real far away from

Does it follow that "There are centers in Dallas that buy material for recycling."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
yes

Q: If Historically in the United States, GDP per capita has doubled on average from one 35-year generation to the next., can we say that "Historically, the United States' GDP has halved every 35 years."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A: no

Premise:
"Suppose the United States could maintain gross national saving at its 2000 GDP share of 18."
Hypothesis: The United States definitely maintains gross national saving at its 2000 GDP share of 12.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

no

Sentence 1: It is possible that the business context for federal CIOs is sufficiently different from that of CIOs in leading organizations that lessons learned may not be applicable.

Sentence 2: It is possible that the business context for federal CIOs is in decline from monkeys stealing their jobs.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer:
it is not possible to tell