Premise:
"You will remember that, in consequence of the War economics practiced at Styles, no waste paper was thrown away. "
Hypothesis: There was a strict penalty for throwing away waste paper.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

it is not possible to tell

input question: The passenger terminal is a modern building with a restaurant on top. If this premise is true, does that tell us:"The passenger terminal is a one-storey building with no roof space usable."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: no

Question:
Based on the premise "Hay to sleep on was fine; he had had far worse beds during the past four years.", can we conclude that "Hay was the worst bed he'd had in his life."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
no

Question: Sentence A: Together, the language, purpose, and legislative history of the applicable statutes, and the factual record before the Commission, suggest an interpretation of the statute that would authorize the following

Sentence B: The Commission demanded that they never bring forth that statute ever again.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question: 'Different.
Unique.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Problem: Here is a premise:
And where ineligible persons participate anyway, the great majority of them are near-poor, often those who are eligible under non-LSC funding programs such as IOLTA and Administration on Aging.

Here is a hypothesis:
The people that need help the most don't get it due to ineligibility.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer:
it is not possible to tell