IN: Janet, please meet with Denise (tomorrow if possible) to: - explain filing system - hand off filing projects you are working on (anytime between tomorrow and next week is fine) - explain how you do service lists for FERC filings. Also, one of you will need to contact the appropriate person to get Denise access to my Lotus Organizer. Don't know how to notify the mailroom people to deliver my mail to Denise's station but see if you can do this also. I spoke with Mike, and Emily is going to handle moving the phones. Merci beaucoup!

Generate a subject line.

OUT: Transition To Do List
IN: This is an email
Gerald, I just received a copy of the revised LIG invoice from Bob Walker. They are now billing Bridgeline for the amount owed. I am concerned that Bob states in the letter that I provided Bridgeline's costs on their behalf. Any thoughts as to what this might open up? Thanks,

What is the subject?

OUT: Revised LIG invoice
QUESTION: Please let me know why my VAR is $2.2 million. My position is 108.3 short, so I need to know why the VAR is so large . Hunter would like an answer as soon as psossible. Thanks
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: Var for Patrice Thurston for 4/2/01
The financial trading group has a recurring request by our conterparties to add a provision addressing the admissability of trader tapes into evidence in court or other proceedings. Our current language merely states: "Each party consents to the recording, at any time and from time to time, by the other party of any and all communications between officers or empoyees of the parties, and waives any further notice of such recording." Here are the facts and issues: 1. Our agreements provide for arbitration (most likely) or jurisdiction in specific courts or are silent as to jurisdiction. 2. ENA policy is to destroy trader tapes after 6 months. 3. If we are doing our job, a written and signed confirmation should exist in our files for each and every financial transaction. On occasion, we have not confirmation signed by ENA's counterparty. By agreeing to add "admissability" language, are we waiving the parol evidence rule? Do we always want the ability to introduce existing recordings? Can you provide us with language acceptable to ENA that we might propose to a counterparty (when asked)? Here's an example of a recent request: "Any such recordings may be submitted in evidence to any court or in any proceedings for the prupose of extablishing any matters pertinent to the [ISDA] Agreement."
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: Admissability of tapes into evidence
Attached is a brief overview of the EGM business (I realize you probably already have this, Lisa). This organization represents perhaps the biggest near term earnings growth opportunity we have as a company and one that will require our organization to develop expertise in new markets, new regualtory fora, and perhaps new countries. From time to time, I'm sure we will all be called on to help out, so I'll endeavor to pass on any info I receive.
Answer: EGM business presentation
Q: We have combined everyone's input and here is where we are thus far. We are targeting Friday, 9/21 for mail out of the invitations. The initial invitation will not have the steering committee members listed, due to timing of the mail out. A second mail out is scheduled for two weeks prior to the event. The second mail out will include the steering committee members. please forward your comments to my attention as soon as possible. Thank you for your input,
Propose a subject line
A:
Draft of October Event Invitation