Q: Given the sentence "A man wearing gray pants and snowshoes taking a break from trudging through the snow on a bright day." can we conclude that "A man in gray pants and snowshoes is truding through the snow on a bright day."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A: The man cannot be taking a break from trudging by continuing the action.
The answer is no.

QUESTION: Given the sentence "A child in a red shirt is sitting on his father's shoulders." can we conclude that "Young boy sits on fathers shoulders."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Let's solve it slowly: Just because child in a red shirt is sitting on his father's shoulders doesn't mean he is young.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

[QUESTION] Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "A woman and a man is standing beside water in front of buildings."
Hypothesis: "Couple standing in front of a building."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
The couple does not have to be a man and a woman.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

Q: Given the sentence "Some people are eating at a food court." is it true that "People are eating in a food court."?
A: Being at a food court is the same as being in a food court.
The answer is yes.

QUESTION: Premise: "A man and a woman are seen through the fence seated at a table."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "Staring into each other's eyes." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Let's solve it slowly: A couple are staring at each other across from a fence.
The answer is yes.

QUESTION: Premise: "Asian boy with his sleeves rolled up is standing in front of what appears to be a game board with circular pieces."
Hypothesis: "The boy is riding a bicycle."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?

Let's solve it slowly:
The boy can't be standing and riding a bike at the same time.
The answer is no.