Q: Mark: I just wanted to update you on where things stand currently with respect to the Domain Name Transfer Agreement that we are negotiating with Risk Management Solutions, Inc. After visiting with Scott about the reps and warranties, he became concerned about the overall scope of the agreement and in particular, what in addition to the URL domain name (weather-desk.com) EEL was being asked to transfer and the restrictions that RMS wanted to place on EEL with respect to this Domain Name and "any variations thereof." We went back to RMS and told them basically that all we were willing to do was transfer them the URL domain name with no strings attached. I'm not sure that this will be acceptable to them given their future intentions which is to acquire from another third party the name "weatherdesk.com" , register it and use it with respect to the products that they offer. All of these discussions that we have had over the past week with respect to our domain name have lead Seth, Scott and I to question what Enron's intent is with respect to the name or any variations thereof given the fact that according to Scott we have submitted applications to register similar names. We were hoping that you could help us answer this question or at least lead us to the right people that could. It seems odd that we would be wiling to transfer this name and yet feel that it is important to pursue registering these other names. I look forward to hearing from you.
Propose a subject line
A: Domain Transfer Agreement

Q: Greetings, Mark. Can you give Jeff a call at the office today when you have a minute? He's anxious to talk to you... 713.853.6894. Hope all went well and as expected on Wednesday! SRS
Propose a subject line
A: Hi Mark!

Q: As we discussed this morning, I have reviewed the subject agreement that you faxed to me. As I indicated yesterday, if I had been provided to agreement for approval by HPL, I would have approved it for execution. I still feel that we should always have a waiver of consequential damages provision in the agreements, however, as I indicated to Mitch, the risk of such damages is very minimal. I think the resolution that you, Stacey and Mitch worked out by changing the term to monthly is excellent. This will allow you to replace the agreement in the future when TXU has developed it new form. Please call me if you need anything further regarding this matter.
Propose a subject line
A: TXU Lone Star Pipeline transportation agreement

Q: Attached is the template settlement agreement for the EPMI assignment transactions. Bill and Tanya, can we get an updated copy of the transaction list (I think you may have identified some additional transactions since you ran the copy that I have in front of me). Bill, has anyone discussed with you the "message" that these transactions may be sending to counterparties ... you have probably already discussed this with Louise and John and others, but if not, we may want to make sure we are on the same page as to communications with counterparties before we get the ball rolling.
Propose a subject line
A:
Settlement Agreement