Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
--------
Question: Let the liberal-shaming process begin!

Answer: Yes

Question: Agreed, you left out the part about how we are entering a recession but our legislature continues to bury its collective head in the sand. They continue to believe oil prices will rebound and save the state, and why shouldn't they, I mean it's happened many times in the past right? Yes indeed it has, but that was when we were pumping millions of barrels of oil a day and only needed $50 or $60 a barrel to balance the budget, not the $100+ a barrel were hoping for now.

They refuse to believe it because they know that implementing a more balanced state revenue stream would require some form of taxes. Taxes would likely spell the end of many political careers, so we are left with a bunch of ostriches in Juneau with their heads in the sand.......

Answer: Yes

Question: I've read state OCS yearly statistical reports, Kirk, and those statistics just don't support your so-called legal opinion that children are being abused. Neglect perhaps, but abuse no. I'd like to know if in any of your child welfare cases how many of your child clients were removed from their homes solely based on the fact of overcrowding minus abuse or neglect. How many of your child clients did you bother to reunify with their families or did you even care about reunification? Your legal job is to reunify not divide families. And yes I agree, there's a lot of money to be made off the heads of children, especially in the legal profession like yours.

Answer:
No