Definition: In this task, you will be shown a prompt from a judicial decision and multiple holding statements derived from citations following text in a legal decision. Holdings represent the governing legal rule when the law is applied to a particular set of facts. There are five answer choices for each citing text. The correct answer is the holding statement that corresponds to the citing text. You should write an incorrect option. Even though there exist multiple wrong answers, we only need a single wrong answer. There is a <HOLDING> token in the position of the citing text prompt where the holding statement was extracted.
Input: many years. See, Leske Dep., at 7-8. In addition, she had maintained a garden at the Defendants' farm, and had stayed over night there on occasion, during the Summer of 1996. Id. at 17-19. Leske testified that the Wilkin County Sheriff's Deputies had been to the Defendants' farm a number of times, during the Summer, looking for the Defendants, and that she had recorded those visits. Id. at 17-18, 24-25, 31-34. Leske also testified that, on August 28, 1996, she was staying overnight at the Defendants' residence. Id. at 46. Both Mr. and Mrs. House have testified that they were aware of Leske's presence at their home that night, and t daughter, who was placed in charge of father's home in his absence, was residing therein); Wichert v. Cardwell, 117 Wash.2d 148, 812 P.2d 858, 860 (1991) (<HOLDING>); see also, Pineview Overlook, Inc. v. Cooper,
Holding statements: (A) holding that an overnight guest has a legitimate expectation of privacy in his hosts home (B) holding that defendant could challenge search of luggage belonging to overnight guests staying in his house (C) holding that squatter in home did not have standing to challenge search of house where he was staying (D) holding daughter who was watching parents home and staying overnight met the residing requirement (E) holding that defendant had reasonable expectation of privacy in gambling records stored under his parents bed although he did not reside regularly at his parents home he kept clothing there and had occasionally remained overnight
Output:
holding that an overnight guest has a legitimate expectation of privacy in his hosts home