Categorize the comment on the basis of severe toxicity. If the comment is severely toxic output Yes, otherwise output No.

[Q]: How is she not responsible? She is just as guilty in fact he probably couldn't have done it without her. This is sick. We as Alaskan should take a serious look into the court system, I just I just don't know what to say... Prayers to the victims.
[A]: No

[Q]: "Thousands of New York women return each year to clinics for a third or fourth abortion. Bill Clinton's famous formulation that abortion should be "safe, legal, and rare" or Hillary Clinton's more recent proclamation that abortion is "a sad, even tragic choice," http://nymag.com/nymetro/news/features/15248/index3.html
[A]: No

[Q]: It was an illegal lease. Get out of that building and sue for the money bilked. Somehow, our leaders have been captured and are still enamored with the great developer/ landlord/ pocket liner. How tone deaf can they be. That building will always be the Taj MaHawker. And as long as the legislature is in there, the resentment will simmer and will not fade. How freaking tone deaf can our public officials be? Even the city. None of them should be touching that building with a 10-foot pole, brokering a deal, etc. What, Pfeffer and Acre get private audiences with the whole leadership apparatus, and gets to pull the strings? Was Gottstein or anyone from the public there to voice the public's interest? Let it go to market. The free market. And get out from under the stain and attempt to stand up for some of our public dollars that have been squandered. This article made me scream out at breakfast this morning, "Motherf***ers!"
[A]:
Yes