In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.
--------
Question: Comment: IF Jeff Kruse were a liberal democrat;
First, Kruse would fight back, and argue: racists bigots are attacking his Native American heritage, and are denying him his right to partake in tobacco Americana, an indigenous plant us Indians have been smoking since the dawn of time, as is our cultural right to do.
Kruse would also go on the attack of his Native American culture being demonized in a most bigoted manner. The only time you will find a more hugging group than my Chickasaw family is attending an AA meeting Native Americans tend to be huggy people. They remind m much of my hippy friends.
Here's what the liberal bigots do not want to talk about. They claim this is pervasive in Salem, and yet Kruse is the only one to be singled out. as a smoking conservative he makes an easy political target to deflect from the fact the democrats were busted taking money from a sexual predator.

Answer: Non-obscene

Question: Comment: Sue his ass amen! The PERMANENT fund dividend is based off a system that replenishes its self every year. If we don't have as good of a year then the PFD would be less. Based off a 5 year average. He wants to cut the money that we would be putting back into the economy to bail out the states fuck ups. How about the state pay for there own mistakes and stop with all the dump road projects like upgrading our high way to 6-8 lanes. We don't need that. Slow down take your time or drive a different rout. Or all the money there wasting on bridges to no where. Or there own salaries. Don't cut the PFD.

Answer: Obscene

Question: Comment: The problem, as they say, is that there are "liars, damn liars, and statistics." It's quite sad that so many people who fancy themselves as intelligent and well Informed, swallow what politicians and other authority figures say without understanding how statistics can be manipulated.

Why, just last night on the PBS NewsHour, Democratic senator Chris Murphy of Connecticut was interviewed in connection with the Texas church slayings. To a major extent, he obviously didn't know what he was talking about or, like our own poster ohanaman, may have conveniently left out inconvenient truths that didn't support his agenda. To quote him:

"This shooter by using a military-style assault weapon was able to engage in one of the worst mass shootings in American history, so clearly a "good guy with a gun" did not stop a "bad guy with a gun" this weekend in Texas. It's part of this absurd mythology that the gun industry has tried to perpetuate in this country which is never ever true." Never?

Answer:
Obscene