We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Ex Input:
Bad Gun control are things that hinder a lawfull person from being able to purchase and use firearms.

Ex Output:
Valid

Ex Input:
When we factor in the usefulness of guns for self-defense against violent criminals, it's clear that normal gun owners are at less risk of criminal victimization.

Ex Output:
Valid

Ex Input:
Cornell is right when he suggests that an individual right theory was discussed, because that point was conceded and no one disputed that the black men who suffered under Cruikshanks actions had an individual RKBA.

Ex Output:
Valid