You will be given a definition of a task first, then an example. Follow the example to solve a new instance of the task.
In this task, you must classify if a given review is positive/negative, indicating your answer as P or N.

plot : two teen couples go to a church party , drink and then drive .
they get into an accident .
one of the guys dies , but his girlfriend continues to see him in her life , and has nightmares .
what 's the deal ?
watch the movie and " sorta " find out . . .
critique : a mind - fuck movie for the teen generation that touches on a very cool idea , but presents it in a very bad package .
which is what makes this review an even harder one to write , since i generally applaud films which attempt to break the mold , mess with your head and such ( lost highway & memento ) , but there are good and bad ways of making all types of films , and these folks just did n't snag this one correctly
.
they seem to have taken this pretty neat concept , but executed it terribly .
so what are the problems with the movie ?
well , its main problem is that it 's simply too jumbled
.
it starts off " normal " but then downshifts into this " fantasy " world in which you , as an audience member ,
have no idea what 's going on
.
there are dreams , there are characters coming back from the dead , there are others who look like the dead , there are strange apparitions , there are disappearances , there are a looooot of chase scenes , there are tons of weird things that happen , and most of it is simply not explained .
now i personally do n't mind trying to unravel a film every now and then , but when all it does is give me the same clue over and over again , i get kind of fed up after a while , which is this film 's biggest problem .
it 's obviously got this big secret to hide , but it seems to want to hide it completely until its final five minutes .
and do they make things entertaining , thrilling or even engaging , in the meantime ?
not really .
the sad part is that the arrow and i both dig on flicks like this , so we actually figured most of it out by the half - way point , so all of the strangeness after that did start to make a little bit of sense , but it still did n't the make the film all that more entertaining .
i guess the bottom line with movies like this is that you should always make sure that the audience is " into it " even before they are given the secret password to enter your world of understanding .
i mean , showing melissa sagemiller running away from visions for about 20 minutes throughout the movie is just plain lazy ! !
okay , we get it .
. .
there are people chasing her and we do n't know who they are .
do we really need to see it over and over again ?
how about giving us different scenes offering further insight into all of the strangeness going down in the movie ?
apparently , the studio took this film away from its director and chopped it up themselves , and it shows .
there might 've been a pretty decent teen mind - fuck movie in here somewhere , but i guess " the suits " decided that turning it into a music video with little edge , would make more sense .
the actors are pretty good for the most part , although wes bentley just seemed to be playing the exact same character that he did in american beauty , only in a new neighborhood .
but my biggest kudos go out to sagemiller , who holds her own throughout the entire film , and actually has you feeling her character 's unraveling .
overall , the film does n't stick
because it does n't entertain , it 's confusing , it rarely excites and
it feels pretty redundant for most of its runtime , despite a pretty cool ending and explanation to all of the craziness that came before it .
oh ,
and by the way , this is not a horror or teen slasher flick . . .
it 's just packaged to look that way because someone is apparently assuming that the genre is still hot with the kids .
it also wrapped production two years ago and has been sitting on the shelves ever since .
whatever . .
. skip it !
where 's joblo coming from ?
a nightmare of elm street 3 ( 7/10 ) - blair witch 2 ( 7/10 ) - the crow ( 9/10 ) - the crow : salvation ( 4/10 )
- lost highway ( 10/10 ) - memento ( 10/10 ) - the others ( 9/10 ) - stir of echoes ( 8/10 )
Solution: N
Why? The phrases used in the review convey a negative sentiment (e.g. "presents it in a very bad package").

New input: i have little against remakes and updates of older films and tv series .
if there 's a will , there 's a way ; and i believe that anything , no matter how great or revered can be effectively improved upon .
this is the reason that i responded so well to gus van sant 's universally panned update of psycho ; i thought it to be not only an intriguing cinematic experience , but also very on - par with an original .
but i do have a big problem with remakes that are blatantly bad .
you see , the point of a remake is , or at least it should be , to iron out the original 's flaws and bring the work that much closer to greatness or even perfection .
but what if the source material on which the remake is based is n't any good to begin with ?
that is the only cinematic question pondered by the bland actioner the mod squad .
i 've only seen a couple episodes of the late 60s tv series on which it is based , and to be honest , i did n't like it all that much .
it has a concept that -- and still is -- interesting ; a group of corrupt young adults ,
all in their early 20s are given a choice : they either go to jail for the various crimes that they all have committed , or they can become undercover cops , helping the police get into places that they normally would n't be able to access .
obviously , all 3 opt for the latter option and become undercover policemen ( and policewomen ) .
the three main characters here are played by claire danes , omar epps and giovanni ribisi .
of the three , only danes has a real character .
ribisi 's dumbass 20 year old is played exclusively for laughs ; epps ' slightly more intelligent one is used to create various chase scenes .
when the squad 's superviser gets killed off and his reputation dirtied in death , the three of them , sure that their beloved master was framed , go off and investigate on their own , discovering corrupt cops , lots and lots of expensive whores and very lucrative drug operations .
all kinds of good stuff !
the only times that the mod squad comes even close to working is in its comedic moments .
although ribisi is a trite actor and his characters repeat movie after movie , his man here is really rather amusing , when the script gives him a chance .
epps ' straight man is effectively played against ribisi 's clueless spontaneity .
but the rest of the film is dull , boring and singularly uninteresting .
a drug - op action plot is no longer anything new , not even with teenage action heroes , and the way it 's executed here , it 's also nowhere near exciting or suspenseful
.
claire danes ' character has potential , but it is buried under heaps of cliches and her performance is too restrained .
she could have been a tour - de - force , but instead director scott silver puts shackles on her and simply does not allow her to do anything really significant with her role .
epps and ribisi fare slightly better and do as well as can be expected , although their characters are n't nearly as rich as danes ' could have been .
the mod squad is a mind - numbing marketing plot of a film , and teens will jump all over it .
it 's full of bad dialogue , scenes and concepts that make no sense and -- get this --
drug dealers that like to tango with other guys in their spare time .
nothing is remotely intriguing or worth paying for .
claire danes is no longer alluring -- mainly because she 's got a horrible hairdo , so that draw is out .
there are , however , cool explosions , guns and chases which may lure a viewer into thinking that he or she is about to experience an exciting thriller of some sort .
do not be fooled .
some may call this escapist fare -- i call it escape - as - quickly - as - you - can fare .
Solution:
N