In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Comment: So you're saying the Chuch leaders should publicly criticize Bill Clinton, Jessie Jackson, Bill Cosby, Al Gore, Democratic supporter Harvey Weinstein, Democrat Kevin Spacey, etc. for their sexual violence?

How about Hillary the enabler?
Non-obscene

Comment: The authors of the JJ report insist that homosexuality played no role in the abuse crisis, but their own data undermine this conclusion. For example, they plainly admit that "81% of the victims [between 1950 and 2002] were male," and that 78% were post-pubescent.

So if the abusers weren't pedophiles, and the victims were mostly adolescent males, wouldn't that make the victimizers homosexuals?

What else could we possibly be talking about if not homosexuality?

Why can't you answer this question?
Non-obscene

Comment: Is it possible for Canadians to renounce their citizenship? Is there a prescribed form to sign? Or is it sufficient that I join the Taliban and build IED's to target Canadian/Allied troops?
Non-obscene