Question: Sentence A: After a predictable first romance with Rome, Venice, or Florence, they spend the rest of their lives systematically working their way through the small but wildly varied country, region by region, visit after visit.

Sentence B: They visited the country 20 times in 20 years.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question: Sentence A: Even without such changes, the Postal Service could pursue regional wage differentials.

Sentence B: The Postal Service wants to pay higher wages in New York.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question: Sentence A: For the followers of Andrew Jackson, the destruction of the Second Bank of the United States was the panacea; for the disciples of William Jennings Bryan, the panacea was silver coinage; for the followers of Ronald Reagan, supply-side economics was the crackpot quick fix.

Sentence B: The destruction of the Second Bank of Canada was the panacea for the disciples of William Jennings Bryan.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?

Answer: no

Question: Sentence A: Today there is little to see, apart from the remains of Peter's House (the veracity of which can neither be proved nor disproved) and a ruined second- to third-century synagogue.

Sentence B: Most people who come to the area only stay for one day to see Peter's House.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?

Answer:
it is not possible to tell