TASK DEFINITION: In this task, you're given a statement, and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence clearly disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3' corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.
PROBLEM: Statement: It means that instead of blandly assuming less regulation is better than more or more competition is better than less, you have to study the specifics of each case very carefully. Choices: 1. Studying the specifics of every case is what it means. 2. If you don't study the specifics, you won't get it right. 3. There's no need to study the specifics, not at all.

SOLUTION: 3

PROBLEM: Statement: to accelerate the development of this industry in the United States. Choices: 1. Development in this industry is not able to be accelerated. 2. It will cost million to accelerate development of this industry. 3. Development of this industry in the United States can be accelerated.

SOLUTION: 1

PROBLEM: Statement: Participants also noted that the PCAOB should take advantage of the fact that under the current environment no one has more motivation for getting bad auditors off the street than the accounting firms themselves. Choices: 1. Bad auditors are identified by cameras in the office lunch room. 2. Accounting firms are motivated to remove bad auditors. 3. The PCAOB should not be concerned with bad auditors at accounting firms.

SOLUTION:
3