IN: This is an email
I have a stretch goal for the operations budget under Enron Americas to reduce costs by the end of the year. To this end, I have recently studied possible options for reaching the targeted savings. To make the best decision on this, I have reviewed functions within my team on the basis of core versus non-core functions, and the inherent cost versus value proposition. As a result, I made the decision last week to disband Joel Henenberg's team. To fulfill the role of Joel and his team in leading IT initiatives, we will lean on the appropriate IT project managers and the business sponsors/end users. Joel and his team were told of this decision on Friday afternoon last week. Our HR rep spent some time with the team explaining the corporate re-deployment service that they all will be working through over the next few weeks. Let me know if you have any questions regarding this. While it was a tough decision, I feel comfortable having made it.

What is the subject?

OUT: Disbanding of Joel Henenberg's Team
QUESTION: Hello, I just wanted to say I hope your weekend went well. Payton is growing like a weed. He is now tickalish. He also has learned how to scream, now that's about all he does. He has a walker and he loves to sit in it and just talk away. He is such a happy baby, everyone enjoys him and loves to see him, he's so pleasant.
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: Payton
The only problem I can see with this is that paragraph 4 could be construed to encourage NMNG to request amendment not only to increase the MAXDTQ but also to decrease it (if the MAXDTQ has been increased by a previous amendment). I worry that this might mislead NMNG that the parties can decrease the MAXDTQ by agreement rather than NMNG using capacity release procedures. However, the paragraph does not obligate TW to do anything & doesn't give NMNG any rights, since any change in the MAXDTQ must be by mutual agreement (and it's subject to available capacity). Since it does not seem to give either party anything they do not already get under the tariff, I think I would recommend we omit it. However, NMNG might insist on this or similar language to reflect the "deal" --- or at least the conversations of
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: Transwestern Contract Approval Request
The next phase of Curve Manager enables security on who marks your curves. Please reply back w/ who you want access to modifying your curves. Thanks,
Answer: Curve File Security
Here is an email: POSREP HOEGH GALLEON, DATE: 11-May 12:00 8:00 (UTC) A) Position at noon: N 14 54 E 051 16 B) Dist. From last noon: 425 nm C) Dist. To go to next port: 774 nm D) ETA next port: Qalhat 13 0900 LT E) 1: Average sea/wind Sea: E 3 Wind: E 2 2: Average speed 18.48 kn 3: BOG consumed 0 m3 4: BOG Total 0 m3 5: F.O Consumed 164 m3 6: G.O. Consumed 0 m3 Brgds Knut Bentzr?d Master LNG/C "Hoegh Galleon" E-mail: master.gall@hoegh.no Teleph: Inmarsat tel.no.+873 330853910 Fax : Inmarsat fax no.+873 330853913 Telex : Inmarsat B telex no.+583 330853915 Telex : Inmarsat C telex no.+583 430853910 (24hrs.watch)
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: Posrep 11 May
QUESTION: Since 1/1/99, 84 people at an MD or above level left the company. The only executives who maintained an office in an Enron building after they left were Cliff Baxter, David Haug and Ken Rice. Cliff's runs through 10/31/01, David through 9/30/01 and Ken's access will probably be turned off in a week. If you need any other information, just give me a call at x33993. Also, David mentioned that you all had discussed potential changes to the PRC/Bonus process. It might be very helpful if the 3 of us could brainstorm and I'd be happy to go through the Board/Shareholder approval process. We may be limited in what we can do given how late in the year it is. Thanks! !
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS:
Consultants - Office Space