In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Comment: Fucking bullshit. "Best care available", lock up the seaworld trainers around metal walls in a crammy room. FFS Tilikum only attacked due to stress, when he and his other fellow whales do not preform well doing rehearsals, they are not fed, in which the other whales attack Tilikum for some food, raking him with their teeth. And his dorsal fin? A healthy whale's fin is straight, not floppy. To hell with the trainers he killed, they deserved that shit.
Obscene

Comment: maybe if you kiss my ass I'll put a good word in for you at the welfare office, moocher.
Obscene

Comment: Outsider: I fear you miss the point. No one suggested Mr. trump "discussed" moral equivalency. The issue involves his engaging in the exercise of moral equivalency in his comments.

The car killing is hardly a "separate" matter. It was an action taken against the counter-demonstrators by a supporter of white supremacy. Would you excuse such an action taken by a supporter of ISIS as a "separate matter undertaken by one person"? Of cours you wouldn't.... Gary Crum
Non-obscene