In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine the neutral choice based on your inference from the statement and your commonsense knowledge. The neutral choice is a sentence that neither agrees nor disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3', corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence. If sentence X agrees with sentence Y, one's correctness follows from the other one. If sentence X disagrees with sentence Y, they can not be correct at the same time.

Example Input: Statement: The legislative history contains no evidence that Congress believed it was limiting legal representation of H-2A workers to the period when such workers were physically present in the United States. Choices: 1. There is no history that has evidence that Congress oppressed the workers. 2. There is a lot of legislative history backing up the limited legal representation. 3. Some people believe the H-2A workers were not treated with respect.
Example Output: 3

Example Input: Statement: An impressive rocky coastline with a backdrop of verdant hills continues southward to Talamanca, a heavily developed beach with a fine view of Ibiza Town. Choices: 1. Talamanca is the most heavily developed beach in Ibiza. 2. There is a beach called Talamanca, where one can see Ibiza town. 3. The verdant hills stop far to the north of Talamanca.
Example Output: 1

Example Input: Statement: The facts fit the Panglossian economist's vision quite Emerging economies do typically run trade deficits, wages do rise with productivity, and actual experience offers no support at all for grimmer visions. Choices: 1. There is a vast support offered because there is a huge experience. 2. Trade deficits are run by the emerging economies, that's the Panglossian economist's vision. 3. People are happier because the wages rise with productivity.
Example Output:
3