Categorize the comment on the basis of obscenity. If the comment is obscene output Yes, otherwise output No.
--------
Question: Cydney asks : "What do you suggest?" - That's a tough one. I've spent years doing professional technical work via "leaderless" email lists. In those cases, there is a shared purpose. Still, "flame wars" do break out. In most cases, other individuals on the list will eventually step in and ask for a cessation of hostilities. Most of these email lists have an "owner" who can ban troublesome individuals.

Hal says : "It truly is a shame that this cannot be used for an adult discussion of important community and state issues." That statement is spot on. So much wasted time and opportunity where real issues could be solved or at least addressed! This kind of virtual turd-throwing (like simians in a zoo) is a great part of what is wrong with our republic.

Answer: No

Question: 1. Would you guys quit showing the picture of this punk.
2."It is up to God to punish homosexuals. It is not up to servants," the US resident added, sitting before a flag of his home country Afghanistan."

Answer: Yes

Question: Damm, read a lot of comments, some were on point, some were just political, some even referenced san fran, guess they were talking about anch being a sanctuary city also, plus all the hand outs at the parks, well the point is, the OWNERS of these planes earned those tires, and the vec's that sat on top of them, they worked for them, I know because I have never found a free one yet, I hope they catch them, prosecute them and lets see what our criminal system does, I have $100.00 that says, these are poor misguided souls and nothing happens, because we are a soft , kind hearted people, sorry bastards,,,

Answer:
Yes