This is to confirm tomorrow's USEC Meeting with Richard Kingdon and Michael Woo. The meeting will take place in EB3321 @ 10:00a.m. on Tuesday, March 21. Many Thanks, Liz
Answer: USEC Meeting
Here is an email: Attached is a draft of the turnkey construction contract for your review. Ron, As we discussed, Exhibit A - Scope of Work will need to be included. Please note the following points: 1. Liquidated Damages - Need to assess a value for these damages. 2. Force Majeure - This would currently provide EE&CC with relief from the In-Service Date requirements and consequently, the LDs. Is this acceptable? 3. Permitting - Need to specify in Exhibit F, those permits that ENA would secure, and make EE&CC responsible for any others. 4. Utility Coordination - Currently this is very generally. Are there specific responsibilities that should be stated in this Agreement wrt the Utility? Please review with these in mind. I will be out tommorrow and Friday. Let's plan on meeting Monday to discuss the draft.
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: Mooring Facility Construction
Q: Joe, just wanted to give you and update on how Payton is. He is growing like a weed, he is now 16lbs and 5 ozs. His hair is getting thicker, I had to trim his hair over his ears because it was getting long enough to tuck it behind his ears He is learning very fast, he can move really well in his walker when he is on smooth flooring and he is praticing everyday to sit up and crawl, it want be long. He still talks alot and never cries, he is such a wonderful baby. He can turn around on his back in a 360 turn and he can roll across the room, if nothing is in his way. Wel, he is ready for me to get him out of his bed, I better go!! He looks forward to visiting with you soon!
Propose a subject line
A: Payton
IN: PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL Julia The tax issue, as far as I see it does not do anything for us except put us in the position that we will have to make an application for a power marketing certificate using whatever vehicle provides the tax advisors with the solution they are seeking. With Enron under the spotlight at the moment any filing at FERC would be picked up by the media and could be used to cause untold further damage to Enron's credibility and reputation. We could not for example provide any credible reason for setting up such an entity without revealing our true intent. In addition, the FERC Commissioners are going to be wary about expediting any application at the moment for an Enron entity which does not have an interest in a generating unit, for example. As for Clinton Energy Services Management Inc, which has a power marketing certificate, we are getting an opinion from outside Counsel to confirm that if this entity was moved to become a subsidiary of Enron Corp. that because of the current ownership structure no filing will be necessary with FERC. We at least retain this option and can thereby proceed fairly quickly if required. As to trading without a power marketing certificate I could not support this course of action. In addition, we would probably be in breach of any agreement we have with counterparties enabling them to terminate the agreements immediately. If you need me I will be on 713 533 0313. and will be logged on. Marcus

Generate a subject line.

OUT: PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL
IN: This is an email
Sara, Here is the language for "Binding Effect". Please take a look and l= et me know if it gets you what you need. I've attached the Assignment and = Assumption agreement for your review.=20 Regards,=20

What is the subject?

OUT: Proposed language for section 8(b) "Binding Effect"
Danny, Listed below are some statistics that we keep track of relative to our IDD business. The growth of this business is attributable to the great mix and number of people that we have in the Storage group under Sue's direction. We feel that a big reason for our success is the great team that we have built and we have gone to great lengths to insure that we have the right mix of people in the group. This is why were so excited to see that Morgan was interested in coming back to the group. Not only does this get our staffing back to the level that it needs to be, but Morgan has proven that he is highly effective in the group. If the situation with Morgan doesn't work out then I feel the need to continue looking for the "right" person to replace Theresa. This approach is also the approach for the Pricing and Structuring group under Jo's leadership (i.e. insuring the right mix and number of people). We have been looking to replace Jeff Nielsen with the right person and feel that the security of our business requires another person on the Pricing Desk. I wanted to bring both of these jobs to your attention given the staffing questions that we had today. STORAGE STATISTICS: Transactions (Bcf) Annual Revenue ($millions) 1997 49 $ 5.5 1998 39 $ 6.7 1999 40 $ 6.7 2000 85 $10.7 2001 119 $21.2
Answer:
Storage Business