Given a paragraph about movies and a set of conversational questions and answers about the paragraph, say whether the passage contains sufficient information to answer the follow-up question. Say Yes if it is answerable; otherwise, say No. The paragraph has the prefix 'CONTEXT:'. Each conversation question has a prefix 'Q:' followed by the answer prefix 'A:', and the follow-up question has a prefix 'FOLLOWUP_Q:'.

[EX Q]: CONTEXT: The car which they take off in at the end of the movie is the fantasy version of the car the Thunderbirds sing about during Greased Lightning and not the white car which gets torn up during the race. The Greased Lightning car, being a fantasy car, is a way of saying at the end of the movie that Danny and Sandy's dreams have come true: they will live happily ever after, or so they want the audience to believe. They ride off into the sunset together and everyone is happy for them. None of the other characters see anything wrong with it because it is a fantasy world in Danny, Sandy, and the audience's eyes, the rest of them are just seeing it as it is. At least that is my take on it. <sep> Q: What is the symbolism of the flying cars? A: car which they take off in at the end Q: What movie is the car from? A: Greased Lightning Q: Who are the star characters in the movie? A: Danny and Sandy <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Does anyone think the flying car is notable?
[EX A]: Yes

[EX Q]: CONTEXT: It could be that their accents are meant as indicators to their personality and class. In the examples you give: Thenardier adopts a 'fake' french accent, to attempt to pass himself off as more sophisticated than he is. The fact the accent is French is unimportant, it's the act of pretense by Thenardier that is being portrayed. Gavroche is an urchin, perhaps the bottom rung of the lowest class in society. His accent is thick cockney, which is analogous to being common and uneducated in British culture. In disparity to this: Jean Valjean (whilst imitating someone of nobler birth) has correct enunciation and a statesmanlike presence. This is indicative of education, and a higher class citizen. <sep> Q: Why are there accents in Les Miserables? A: their accents are meant as indicators to their personality and class <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: How is this expressed in the film?
[EX A]: Yes

[EX Q]: CONTEXT: To a strong movie fan, no, it cannot hurt - ever. An alternate (possibly revisionist) version of a movie cannot detract from the original viewing experience, it can only add an additional positive (or negative) experience. In the case of Ridley and Blade Runner, I have every version, and his "Final Cut" is my favorite, and I am pleased-giddy that he was able to get yet another version released. It is my opinion that, given 4+ versions, you have the luxury of choosing the one you enjoy most. You have nothing but upside! Any downside is for pessimists, or people who have undue hatred for capitalist who play their little games while we are still free to play ours. In the case of his refusal to agree to a Director's Cut of Prometheus that is cool too. I enjoy the fact that as an artist Ridley Scott wraps his arms fully around the meta concept of additional releases, and indeed incorporates that into the overall art like Claude Monet's Water Lilies, or Haystacks as long as HE is making the decisions. (You might argue the opposite for 99% of all other director/studio combos.) <sep> Q: Does Ridley Scott's Director's Cut releases hurt his movies? A: To a strong movie fan, no, it cannot hurt - ever <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: What was his first director's cut?
[EX A]:
No