TASK DEFINITION: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.
PROBLEM: Comment: Those damned toddlers should read the labels before they swallow the magnets!

SOLUTION: Obscene

PROBLEM: Comment: maybe go back to prison chicken shit. let's meet, I'll come over to your house and I want you to tell me to my face. I would watch what you say about service members, chicken.

SOLUTION: Obscene

PROBLEM: Comment: "Just because conservatives are convinced traditional media have an inherent liberal bias doesn't make it so."
And it follows that just because traditional media don't think they have a liberal bias also does not make it so.

"traditional media are often the only media with enough resources and experience to thoroughly investigate and report complex news stories and determine their importance or relevance."
Is that why Willamette Week broke the Kitzhaber/Hayes story while the RG and Oregonian sat on their hands? Not relevant? Or why Ted Coppel claimed ABC News didn't have the resources to investigate the allegations of corruption when Ken Starr's lead investigator into Vince Foster's death gave Coppel compelling evidence it was happening? Because, you know, it was only the opportunity to uncover a possible murder of a high ranking US official. The major outlets also skipped printing the court ordered addendum to Starr's report which provided the evidence. Not important, I guess.

SOLUTION:
Non-obscene