Detailed Instructions: In this task, you will be shown a prompt from a judicial decision and multiple holding statements derived from citations following text in a legal decision. Holdings represent the governing legal rule when the law is applied to a particular set of facts. There are five answer choices for each citing text. The correct answer is the holding statement that corresponds to the citing text. You should write an incorrect option. Even though there exist multiple wrong answers, we only need a single wrong answer. There is a <HOLDING> token in the position of the citing text prompt where the holding statement was extracted.
Q: the arrearage, inability to pay must be relevant to reinstatement. Even though 798(c) does not explicitly designate the inability to pay as a grounds for license reinstatement, we will "not presume that the legislature intended absurd or irrational consequences." In re Judy Ann's Inc., 143 Vt. 228, 232, 464 A.2d 752, 755 (1983). 11. Our interpretation is consistent with the legislative scheme for the enforcement of support. Although the payment of child support is a serious obligation, the state enforces payment orders against noneompliants through various civil rather than criminal sanctions. See 15 V.S.A. 603 (authorizing civil contempt orders), 785 (withholding wages), 791 (issuing liens), 793 (affecting credit reports), 795 (revoking licenses or governmental contracts), 796 (<HOLDING>). To avoid qualifying as punishment, a civil
Holding statements: (A) holding that a court may not enter an injunction freezing assets in action for damages where there is no equitable interest in frozen assets (B) holding assets in escrow (C) holding that a limited partner does not have an interest right or title in the assets of the partnership (D) holding that the receiver of assets not the subsequent purchaser of the assets retained all liabilities not specifically enumerated in a similar purchase and assumption agreement (E) holding that insurance premiums deducted from employees paychecks and commingled with corporate assets were plan assets in accordance with department of labor regulations see 29 cfr 25103102a and therefore that president of employer corporation acted as a fiduciary when he failed to separate those assets for payment to the funds and instead used them to pay company creditors
A:
holding that a court may not enter an injunction freezing assets in action for damages where there is no equitable interest in frozen assets