IN: This is an email
Dear Patrick: We are trying to obtain copies of the document whereby Enron Storage Company conveyed the Napoleonville land assets to LRCI, Inc. They were probably part of the Bridgeline closing documents. Do you have any documents that support this conveyance? Please advise. Thanks,

What is the subject?

OUT: Napoleonville land
QUESTION: NGI's Daily Gas Price Index published : October 29, 2001 ALJ Clears Transwestern of Market Power Charges A FERC administrative law judge has found no improprieties, nor evidence of the exercise of market power in negotiated rate contracts between Transwestern Pipeline and two shippers on its system, which resulted in the shippers being charged as much as $27/MMBtu last February, far in excess of the pipeline's allowed transportation rate of 38 cents/MMBtu (RP97-288-009). ALJ Jacob Leventhal had only one fault to find, and that was with Transwestern's method of posting capacity. The judge said, and Transwestern agreed, to modify its tariff "so that all posting, bidding and award procedures are set forth in a separate provision with an appropriate caption" on its Internet bulletin board. Shippers had said that reviewing capacity on the Transwestern web site was "a tortuous process." Indicated Shippers claimed Transwestern's inadequate capacity posting and award procedures did not provide all interested parties with an opportunity to bid for the capacity that was available. While "both Indicated Shippers and (FERC) Staff find it curious that SET (Sempra Energy Trading) and Richardson (Products Co.) were the sole bidders on the contracts awarded to each of them...curiosity does not translate into proof," the judge said. Witnesses in the expedited hearing testified no bids were considered in advance of the capacity posting. The judge subsequently found the capacity was awarded in a manner consistent with Transwestern's tariff. Similarly, Levanthal could find no evidence that Transwestern exercised market power in negotiating the rates with shippers or withholding or threatening to withhold capacity. The capacity was available at recourse rates, and the shippers knew those rates were available. "Staff's arguments really are criticisms of the posting and award procedures, but do not demonstrate the exercise of market power." The two shippers said they made a business decision to propose the "index-to-index" formula that produced the higher rates, rather than take the recourse rate "to minimize any risk on transportation options." The index-to-index formula refers to taking the difference between the daily published commodity prices at two different points and subtracting to get the transportation rate between them. In this case the two points were the San Juan Basin and the SoCal Needles delivery point. The case was set for expedited hearing last summer by the commissioners acting on staff recommendations.
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: NGI Article on TW Ruling
Reminder The Enron Oral History Project Continues... "Using History to Help Enron Become the World's Leading Company" How can an understanding of strategic choices, regulatory change and corporate culture help Enron achieve its vision? Speaker: Joseph Pratt, Cullen Professor of History and Business, University of Houston and Co-Director, Enron Oral History Project Thursday, June 7 11:30 a.m. to 12:30 p.m. EB 5C2 To Make a Reservation, Call 3-1941 and Select Option 1 Lunch will not be provided, but you are welcome to bring your own. Please inform us ahead of time if you need special accommodations to participate in this meeting. Call 3-9390.
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: Reminder
If you would like to participate in the Katy Flatlands ride on Sunday, July 22, please fill out the attached and return to me no later than Thursday, June 28. I'm located at EB2365c. Thanks! Steph : )
Answer: Katy Flatlands
Here is an email: RBowers@nyiso.com writes to the NYISO_TECH_EXCHANGE Discussion List: This notice is to inform Transmission Customers that the September 20, 2001 OATT Schedule 1 residual adjustments are artificially inflated in the first version of the advisory billing statements. A file used in the computation of subzonal loads was not loaded prior to the billing run making it appear as though no load existed in some subzones. This causes all DAM scheduled purchases and bilateral transactions serving load in the affected subzones to be sold back in the Balancing Market. This creates an under-collection which is then recovered from the market through the balancing energy, losses, & congestion residuals . The 20th will be rerun as soon as price corrections and metered MWh values have been reconciled. The NYISO apologizes for any inconvenience caused by this problem. Regards,
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: September 20, 2001 Residuals
QUESTION: Debra: I have briefly discussed some of the issues concerning the changes we feel are appropriate with your diversity program: Ms. Hunter, Mr. Eakins, Ms. Medcalf. They were interested about in my reasoning behind the suggested changes. I realize their could or will be different verbiage concerning my change's; however, the intent is firm because of the standard GISB payment dates previously agreed upon as well as anticipated payment date for other Resale Customers. I am assuming there is little room for negotiation as the agreement format requirement of the Buyer? Please advise me of your comments concerning the changes so as we can move forward. I have been asked to keep the Diversity people informed of my progress so I am copying Ms. Hunter on this E-Mail. Thanks and I look forward to hearing from you.
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS:
Enron's Master Firm Sales Agreement