In this task, you must classify if a given review is positive/negative, indicating your answer as P or N.

Input: Consider Input: the happy bastard 's quick movie review analyze this how does one do a comedy focused on the mob ?
well , a few years ago , there was a sly little comedy called the freshman , which had marlon brando doing a romp of a send - up of his famous don corleone character and , recently , the utterly stupid ( in a bad way ) movie mafia ! failed to really get the joke .
this time around , however , warner bros .
may have gotten it right with analyze this , a movie that hits its targets
more than it misses .
. .
and for plenty of reasons .
the story goes like this .
a mobster ( robert deniro ) finds himself receiving several panic attacks as of late , fueled by the stress of an upcoming mobster meeting and a near - death following a drive - by shooting .
it 's these attacks that prompt him to hire a psychiatrist ( billy crystal ) who 's mostly reluctant to take the mobster 's case for two reasons .
first , of course , he 's a mobster , but secondly , he 's trying to get married and enjoy a quiet honeymoon with his wife ( lisa kudrow ) and kid .
and , of course , he ca n't rest worth for a moment because the mobster 's goons are always needing the shrink for something , be it a quick consultation or dream analyzation .
fortunately , the movie is played out for plenty of laughs .
director harold ramis ( who also helmed the comedy multiplicity , which was n't half bad ) keeps the tone peppy and light , even if it 's sometimes sprinkled by slight dramatic moments ( shootings ca n't always be taken for laughs , you know ) .
deniro
does some of his finest comic work since the king of comedy , giving off a somewhat similar performance to his role in goodfellas , but with a bit of a lighter heart .
( a scene where he tries to display his anger over the phone and fails miserably is hilarious . )
crystal plays an excellent straight man to deniro 's character , uplifting him from such bombs as father 's day and my giant .
kudrow is also a hoot as crystal 's wife - to - be , who 's on the verge of a breakdown thanks to deniro 's presence .
is the movie perfect ?
not really , thanks to a simplistic ending and some slightly wasted moments with a character portrayed by chazz palminteri
( he 's a comic actor , too , come on , give him some more ! ) , but
it is an enjoyable romp
that lets deniro do something different but same for a change , taking his dramatic act to a new field of comedy . kudos to crystal and kudrow for not just making it his show , either .
line of the movie : crystal :
" when you said you needed family therapy , this is not the family i had in mind ! "

Output: P

Input: Consider Input: from a major league baseball radio broadcast , featuring play - by- play man harry canary and color man whitey hashbrown , with special guest commentator james berardinelli .
hc : as we go to the top of the 8th , we 're joined in the booth by film critic james berardinelli , who 's here fresh from seeing the new baseball movie , major league : back to the minors , the third in the popular saga taking a lighter look at the majors .
nice to see you ,
jim . as a big baseball fan and a movie reviewer
, can you give us the scoop on the new flick ?
jb :
my opinion : the producers should have stopped while they were ahead , and that was nine years ago .
one entry was definitely enough , and i 'm surprised there was a third after the anemic showing and low quality of major league 2 . this latest installment has all the earmarks of something that should have been released direct - to - video .
it 's worse than a mediocre made - for - tv feature .
i should also mention that this movie likely wo n't play all that well in cleveland .
now that the real indians are perennial contenders , they have been replaced by the minnesota twins as the cinematic sadsacks .
actually , most of the action involves the twins ' aaa minor league club , the buzz , rather than the actual major league franchise .
hc : sorry to interrupt , jim , but we still have to do play - by - play for the game on the field .
leading off this inning is john warren .
he steps into the batter 's box and takes kent 's pitch low for ball one .
wh :
so , the story 's strictly minor league , right ?
what 's it about ?
jb :
scott bakula , the guy from quantum leap , plays career minor league pitcher gus cantrell .
when twins owner roger dorn , once again portrayed by corbin bernsen , needs a new manager for his aaa team , he offers the job to gus , who is now faced with two daunting tasks : turn the team around and groom hot prospect
downtown anderson ( played by walt goggins ) for a promotion to " the show .
" with the help of former major leaguers pedro cerrano ( dennis haysbert ) , rube baker ( eric bruskotter ) , and isuro tanaka ( takaaki ishibashi ) , gus gets the buzz on the right track .
in fact , he is so successful that he earns the enmity of the jealous manager of the big - league club , leonard huff ( played with over - the - top relish by ted mcginley ) .
soon , dorn has arranged an exhibition game that pits gus ' overachieving group against huff 's overpaid , last - place bunch .
wh : can we guess who wins ?
jb : the results have all the suspense of watching the videotape of a game when you 've already seen the box score .
on top of that , none of the mock - ups are presented with much flair .
they 're not just boring ; they 're lackluster .
but the major league movies have never been about drama or tension
; they 've been about using baseball situations to generate laughs .
hc : warren fouls off a fastball .
1 and 1 .
wh : are there lots of yuks in this one ?
jb : not one , from start to finish .
i enjoyed the first major league because it was reasonably fresh and funny .
okay , a lot of the jokes were sophomoric , but they made me laugh .
the two sequels have n't just been stale , but their humor quotient has been abysmally low .
even bob uecker 's once - sharp one - liners have turned lame , and they 're the closest the film comes to being even vaguely amusing .
hc : here 's the 1 - 1 pitch .
looooooong drive ? fair or foul ?
foul ball !
the count goes to 1 and 2 .
wh : does the film at least get the baseball details correct ?
jb :
yes .
there are n't any glaring errors
like there were in one of the best - ever baseball movies , the natural .
but i 'd gladly trade a technically accurate film for one with a good story , believable characters , or even a little genuine humor .
heck , the naked gun is a better baseball comedy than major league : back to the minors .
wh : it 's nice to see old friends one more time , is n't it ?
like cerrano , tanaka , and dorn .
jb : depends on whether you really care that anyone is back .
there are n't any real characters here ?
just an assortment of cliched oddballs .
yeah ,
the voodoo hitter , the catcher who ca n't throw back to the pitcher , the japanese player , and the conceited player - turned - owner have all returned , but who really cares ?
they have no depth .
notable absences include tom berenger 's veteran and charlie sheen 's " wild thing .
"
we do n't really miss them , though .
hc : breaking ball , low and outside .
2 and 2 .
wh
: so you 're saying that we should give this one a miss ?
jb
: that 's right .
to use baseball terminology , it 's a three - pitch strikeout .
if you 're looking for a good movie that involves baseball , try popping the natural , field of dreams , bull durham , or even the first major league into the vcr .
actually , this is an oddly - timed release , since baseball fans are likely to be spending more time in parks than in theaters .
even the minor league seasons are already underway .
do n't bother with major league : back to the minors .
it 's a wretched time- waster .
wh :
thanks for the advice .
jb
: you 're welcome .
hc : and here 's the 2 - 2 pitch .
fouled back , right into this booth .
hey , jim , heads up !
oops .
somebody better get him some ice for that .
he may be good at deflecting bad baseball movies , but he needs to learn not to duck into foul balls .
odd how warren seemed to aim that ball right at him , almost as if he has a grudge to settle .
anyway , back to the action on the field ?

Output: N

Input: Consider Input: do film critics have morals ?
are there any unwritten laws an ethical movie critic would or should follow ?
naturally we do n't want to go into a film with any preconceived notions , which is pretty tough but something we all have to accomplish .
secondly , and along the same line , we ca n't prejudge a film because of it 's stars , director , etc .
the difference ?
well , in the first one , we 'd go into a film thinking it 's going to be dumb or
it 's going to be good , and that would affect our viewing ( that movie sounds and looks dumb , so i 'm not expecting much ) .
on the second hand , we 're simply assuming it will be bad or good because of a personal " grudge " against the film company ( it 's made by disney ?
oh , it 's just a merchandising ploy then ) , the actors ( jim carrey 's in it ?
it 's gon na stink ! ) , or the director ( who ? ca n't be that good ) .
this is more of a biased viewpoint as opposed to a first impression viewpoint .
make sense ?
ok ,
but what about comparing ?
is n't that kind of along the same lines ?
when we compare a certain actor or director or even composer 's credibility in one film to another they were involved in , is that really fair ?
sure , in sequels you can expect and accept comparisons a lot more , but what about jackie brown , for example ?
is it fair for me to take the review and turn it into a comparison of pulp fiction , just because quentin tarantino directed and wrote the screenplay for both ?
i think it is , and i 'll tell you why .
a good critic should be able to view the film from the " average joe ( or jane ) " viewpoint , while still taking into account the artistic integrity behind the film .
sometimes that can be tough .
"
the acting was superb , but i was bored " or " i loved it ! !
it was sooooo cheezy !
" might be used to describe a film .
these are contradictions , and a critic has to weigh both sides and come to a suitable balanced critique .
but which is more important ? and which is better ?
an extremely well shot and acted film that is boring , or a really amateurish film that you wanna go back to again and again ?
getting back to the point , my philosophy on comparing films being fair works because we 're reflecting what the public wants to know anyway .
every average person out there who 's interested in this film is likely to ask " how does it compare to pulp fiction ? " and so , as a critic , i 'm already responsible to ask that same question .
jackie brown stars pam grier , the " blaxploitation " heroine from the 1970 's , who is likely to make a big comeback thanks to her role as the title character .
tarantino 's pulp fiction is in big part responsible for john travolta 's sudden revival in the movie industry , and with talks of an oscar nomination , the same is likely to happen for grier .
( we 've made it thru comparison # 1 ! )
jackie is a 44-year - old airline stewardess who brings in extra cash , and probably her main revenue , by smuggling large sums of money into the united states for ordell robbie ( pulp fiction 's samuel l .
jackson and comparison # 2 ) .
ordell is in the illegal firearms business and has enlisted the aid of louis gara ( robert de niro ) , a bank robber who just got out of prison after serving four years , to help him accomplish a scheme worth a half- million dollars .
trouble arises when jackie is stopped by atf agent ray nicolet ( michael keaton ) and taken into custody for possession of narcotics , as well as having more money than is allowed in an airport without being claimed .
naturally this proves an obstacle to ordell 's plans and , not as friendly intended as we 'd hope , he posts jackie 's bail after she is put behind bars .
the thing is , ordell is in this for no one more than himself , and as we learn from his previous actions , he 's willing to kill anyone who stands in the way .
jackie finds herself in a tight squeeze .
ordell wo n't think twice about taking her out if she fails to help him as she 's always done , yet at the same time , a compromise with the authorities would be in order if evidence against ordell was provided .
it comes down to a simple question : would jackie rather face ordell or prison ?
what ensues is a rich and intriguing example of storytelling
as we question who jackie is really out to help : the law , ordell , or maybe just herself .
coming into play is another 70 's veteran , robert forster as jackie 's bail bondsmen max cherry .
max 's obvious fondness for jackie will become a major benefactor in her fight to beat both sides of the system , and forster plays him with subtle charm that adds depth to unbrewed romance .
also involved is ordell 's " surfer girl " girlfriend melanie ( bridget fonda ) , a ditzy sun- bleached babe who spends her time watching tv with a bong in hand .
fonda
does the best she can with an essentially thin role , but there 's nothing more to her , and therefore , she becomes a tossable addition to an otherwise flourishing bouquet of characters .
de niro is also wasted in his role as a quiet nobody crook out to score a few bucks for himself .
de niro is a brilliant actor , but a character who hardly ever speaks does n't need a de niro to play him .
compared to pulp fiction ( comparison # 3 ) , the characters in jackie brown and very thin and replaceable .
in pulp fiction , even the small , seemingly irrelevant characters were wonderful , complete , and lifelike , whereas jackie brown has such common figures that it would n't have suffered much with a lesser talented cast , the exception being grier .
tarantino wrote this script with grier specifically in mind , so to say that she is made for this role is a reversed truth .
sadly , grier too could have received a bit more attention , especially when the story is all about her newly - jarred perception of life .
jackson teams up with tarantino again , but the chemical reaction is n't as awesome as the first time .
jules was the rambling , bible - quoting hitman in pulp fiction , and jackson is the only person who could have pulled it off .
and although jackson is really , really good in jackie brown , i do n't think he 's quite as irreplaceable .
in fact , maybe a new face would have been better .
jackson could 've remained tarantino 's jules , and a new guy could have become ordell , forever to remain so in our memories .
sadly , these characters are too much the same , except ordell just is n't as impressive , and putting this in the hands of jackson once again is only going to deter from our fond recollections of jules .
another problem is that ordell is way too focused on in the beginning .
this is grier 's film , so why spend so long getting to know a man who will become more of a supporting character as the film progresses ?
it not only makes the movie feel a little too slanted , but it makes for a slow beginning because we have to take longer getting to the meat of the story .
it is likely that those pouring into the theater to see this film are going to be those anxious to partake of tarantino 's quirky dialogue and eccentric directing style , and not so much those interested in seeing a silver screen adaption of elmore leonard 's novel " rum punch " .
for those movie - goers , do n't expect another pulp fiction and
you 'll be satisfied , for the script oozes with the familiar brash qualities that has made tarantino an icon of 90 's film- making
.
the directing has toned down a bit , however , yet
we 're still reminded that this is tarantino 's movie thanks to odd split - screen story - telling devices and scenes being replayed multiple times from different viewpoints .
so getting back to the question that i began with , this is n't pulp fiction at all .
it 's good , but it is n't anything that made pulp fiction such a revolutionary effort in the first place .
this is a more conservative tarantino , but not one that wo n't satiate true fans . if you can realize that this is n't going to knock your socks off , then
you 'll be happy to at least let it massage your feet .
after all , we all know how much tarantino loves that particular part of the human anatomy .
Output: P