In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.
One example is below.
Q: Comment: It's bad enough we already have all these American sicko's living in this country shooting up theatre, schools, churches, malls, etc., we don't have room for crazy muslims.
A: Identity-attack
Rationale: This comment contains identity attacks on both American and Muslim.
Q: Comment: Exactly. It was a very strategic legal move on Furlong's part to avoid having some 60 odd people put their testimony and claims on the record in court... where everyone, including media, would have to acknowledge the gory details. The affidavits are out there if you look, and they're heart breakingly sad. Everything from hurling racial insults while beating these kids with sticks, punching them in the head, fondling little girls... if it's true, all I can say is this is one very very sick individual. A predator.

And as for the UBC speaking engagement, I just don't think that Furlong should be given a pass just because he's this powerful, rich old white man whom everyone has put on this pedestal. We already know for a fact that he tried to lie about his even being at these schools in his memoir...and you know what they say: where there's smoke, there's fire.
A:
Non-identity-attack