We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty) into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Input: Consider Input: Sent1: I have been a victim of rape and if I were a victim of murder I would not desire the death penalty for the perpetrator.
Sent2: I think that if the murderer wants the death penalty, they should be allowed it if the victim's family agrees- but for crimes of passion and misunderstanding, no death penalty.

Output: Not similar

Input: Consider Input: Sent1: So how about we stop a penalty that has executed innocents?
Sent2: By the same token, if we keep administering the death penalty while the system is broken, we will have a much greater risk of putting someone innocent to death.

Output: Similar

Input: Consider Input: Sent1: We seem to have more compassion for the victims and potential victims of murderers than we do for the murderers.
Sent2: So we kill killers, but in the end, end up with more murders.
Output: Not similar