Question: Sentence A: This attitude of his gave me furiously to think, and I was slowly forced to the conclusion that Alfred Inglethorp wanted to be arrested.

Sentence B: Alfred Inglethorp's attitude did not make me think he wanted to be arrested.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question: 'I don't get to be Natalia again until you're dead.'
I want you to die so I can become Natalia again.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Problem: Here is a premise:
In the past when I encountered some outlandish inanity--often about taxes--I would sit down at my keyboard and write an answer.

Here is a hypothesis:
I used to take pictures to respond to crazy things.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Sentence 1: oh i had i had a nice sleeping bag i also had uh uh catalytic heater

Sentence 2: I had a sleeping bag that was patterned with flowers
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question:
In the New Republic , Robert Boyers condemns John Updike for setting his sci-fi novel Toward the End of Time in the aftermath of a horrific conflagration.

Does it follow that "Such a scenario is old and cliche already, and Robert Boyers is fond of more innovative sci-fi novels."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
it is not possible to tell

Question:
Based on the premise "The National Front attempted to set up a new government first with V. P. Singh and later, in 1991, with S. Chandra Shekhar as Prime Minister.", can we conclude that "The National Front never attempted to reconfigure the government again."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
no