Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.

Example Input: not mentioned it was a pot luck - I brought brownies! such sweet old ladies... did ya see me? I waved (and winked) at the camera! soo..yeah....unh..unh..it'll come back to me...ummmp? darn..CRS. . unh.... so tell us more about the free samples....
Example Output: Yes

Example Input: During the application process, one does have to verify annual income. That's proof enough isn't it, Davis. And besides, how do you know the low-income person isn't providing proof?
Example Output: No

Example Input: Yes, I was intending to compare both factors. Specifically, Table 13 of the report (p. 28) lists rates of violations resulting in a jail stay as a proportion of the population of each demographic on probation/parole, whereas Table 14 (p. 30) lists rates of violations resulting in a jail stay as a proportion of the total population of each demographic.

My main beef with this article is that it seems to suggest that black adults are jailed at a disproportionately high rate because black adults violate probation/parole (resulting in jail stays) at a disproportionately high rate (i.e., data that would be found in Table 13, which fails to show such a lopsided disproportionality), but instead relates the data from Table 14, which seem irrelevant without also taking into account the proportions of each population on probation/parole in the first place.
Example Output:
No