Teacher:In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.
Teacher: Now, understand the problem? Solve this instance: Comment: Yet another big boost from Justin at giving this story it's own legs.

Ambrose handled it politically brilliantly asking Justin the same question 18 times. She knew she'd get the same on script non-answer 18 times. And it made him look foolish and out manoeuvred.

She played him masterfully.

Now, Justin finds himself cornered in a damned if you do, damned if you don't, catch 22. Go and I look guilty by association. Don't go and I look guilty by disassociation.

It's not the innocuous helicopter ride that's significantly tarnishing Justins brand, yes he made a banal and insignificant ethical blunder, he just handled it so badly every step of the way he's now tarnishing the image of the Aga Khan.

It's the textbook definition of snuffing out a match with a bucket of gasoline.

And it's just entertaining, albeit now eclipsing the Aga Khans good works. NOT the self-serving appearance of good works, I might add.
Student:
Non-sexual-explicit