The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.

Context: 'I am good as well. That is good to hear that you like to have bigger fires as we do not care much for that. We would much rather have some extra water.' 'Water is a little important to us too though , if possible maybe we can split that or maybe we can get some more food in replacement.' 'That may be possible.... 🙂 What did you have in mind for the food replacement? '
Utterance: 'You can have all the water if we can have all the food?'
No

Context: 'Haha well we'll be seeing a lot of each other then. Is water your number one or two priority?' 'Water is my second priority item. I am sure we can work out a fair deal. What do you propose?' 'We'll be able to make it close to equal. Let's do 2 foods for one of us, 2 waters and 2 firewood for the other person. I'll take either.'
Utterance: 'Ok that works for me 🙂 2 food for me, 2 firewood and 1 water. Then you get 2 water and 1 food and 1 firewood. Does that work?'
No

Context: 'I dont need the firewood as much. ' 'That is great for me. I guess i will take all three.🙂' 'sure what other preferences would you like '
Utterance: 'I need a lot of water too. Thank you for understanding.'
No