In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Comment: The senate fiscal plan here is to rob us, the ones who elected the corrupt bastards club. Get rid of them & their ridiculous per diem.
Non-sexual-explicit

Comment: Never a good sign when someone's first response to looking completely incompetent is to be a dick about it.
Sexual-explicit

Comment: "Here's what you need to know."
I already know. No need to try and whitewash another example of naked US aggression against another (sovereign) country.
When something like the poison gas attack happens, the international community shall get together and push for an on-site investigation to determine exactly how it happened and who caused it, instead of using images of the dead for crass politicking.
Obviously, the United States doesn't give a hoot to 'the international community' when it doesn't serve its narrow purposes.
Orwell's Animal Farm, obviously.
For the Canadian PM to come out and say openly that he believes everything coming out of Washington is yet another sign of how light weight he really is compared to Trudeau sr.
He would have spoken out AGAINST it, I'm sure. He had the backbone, jr sorely lacks.
And the complicity of the media - this paper included - glorifying the Pentagon's swinging their water hose is terribly wrong.
Shame, shame, shame.
Non-sexual-explicit