In this task you are given a disfluent question, a proper question and a context. A disfluent question is a question that has some interruptions in it while framing and a proper question is the correct form of the question without any disfluency. Classify whether the question is answerable or not based on the given context.

Example Input: proper question: Who was part of the case with Wisconsin in 1976?
disfluent question: Who was part of the case with Wisconsin in 1852 or no make that in 1976?
context: Private schooling in the United States has been debated by educators, lawmakers and parents, since the beginnings of compulsory education in Massachusetts in 1852. The Supreme Court precedent appears to favor educational choice, so long as states may set standards for educational accomplishment. Some of the most relevant Supreme Court case law on this is as follows: Runyon v. McCrary, 427 U.S. 160 (1976); Wisconsin v. Yoder, 406 U.S. 205 (1972); Pierce v. Society of Sisters, 268 U.S. 510 (1925); Meyer v. Nebraska, 262 U.S. 390 (1923).
Example Output: No

Example Input: proper question: DECnet originally released in 1982 for what reason?
disfluent question: Linux originally released in 1982 for what reason no DECnet?
context: DECnet is a suite of network protocols created by Digital Equipment Corporation, originally released in 1975 in order to connect two PDP-11 minicomputers. It evolved into one of the first peer-to-peer network architectures, thus transforming DEC into a networking powerhouse in the 1980s. Initially built with three layers, it later (1982) evolved into a seven-layer OSI-compliant networking protocol. The DECnet protocols were designed entirely by Digital Equipment Corporation. However, DECnet Phase II (and later) were open standards with published specifications, and several implementations were developed outside DEC, including one for Linux.
Example Output: No

Example Input: proper question: What was the projection of sea level increases in the forth assessment report?
disfluent question: What was the projection of sea level did the IPCC understate no increases in the fourth assessment report?
context: Another example of scientific research which suggests that previous estimates by the IPCC, far from overstating dangers and risks, have actually understated them is a study on projected rises in sea levels. When the researchers' analysis was applied to the possible scenarios outlined by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), the researchers found that in 2100 sea levels would be 0.51.4 m [50140 cm] above 1990 levels. These values are much greater than the 988 cm as projected by the IPCC itself in its Third Assessment Report, published in 2001. This may have been due, in part, to the expanding human understanding of climate.
Example Output:
No