Given the task definition, example input & output, solve the new input case.
In this task, you must classify if a given review is positive/negative, indicating your answer as P or N.
Example: plot : two teen couples go to a church party , drink and then drive .
they get into an accident .
one of the guys dies , but his girlfriend continues to see him in her life , and has nightmares .
what 's the deal ?
watch the movie and " sorta " find out . . .
critique : a mind - fuck movie for the teen generation that touches on a very cool idea , but presents it in a very bad package .
which is what makes this review an even harder one to write , since i generally applaud films which attempt to break the mold , mess with your head and such ( lost highway & memento ) , but there are good and bad ways of making all types of films , and these folks just did n't snag this one correctly
.
they seem to have taken this pretty neat concept , but executed it terribly .
so what are the problems with the movie ?
well , its main problem is that it 's simply too jumbled
.
it starts off " normal " but then downshifts into this " fantasy " world in which you , as an audience member ,
have no idea what 's going on
.
there are dreams , there are characters coming back from the dead , there are others who look like the dead , there are strange apparitions , there are disappearances , there are a looooot of chase scenes , there are tons of weird things that happen , and most of it is simply not explained .
now i personally do n't mind trying to unravel a film every now and then , but when all it does is give me the same clue over and over again , i get kind of fed up after a while , which is this film 's biggest problem .
it 's obviously got this big secret to hide , but it seems to want to hide it completely until its final five minutes .
and do they make things entertaining , thrilling or even engaging , in the meantime ?
not really .
the sad part is that the arrow and i both dig on flicks like this , so we actually figured most of it out by the half - way point , so all of the strangeness after that did start to make a little bit of sense , but it still did n't the make the film all that more entertaining .
i guess the bottom line with movies like this is that you should always make sure that the audience is " into it " even before they are given the secret password to enter your world of understanding .
i mean , showing melissa sagemiller running away from visions for about 20 minutes throughout the movie is just plain lazy ! !
okay , we get it .
. .
there are people chasing her and we do n't know who they are .
do we really need to see it over and over again ?
how about giving us different scenes offering further insight into all of the strangeness going down in the movie ?
apparently , the studio took this film away from its director and chopped it up themselves , and it shows .
there might 've been a pretty decent teen mind - fuck movie in here somewhere , but i guess " the suits " decided that turning it into a music video with little edge , would make more sense .
the actors are pretty good for the most part , although wes bentley just seemed to be playing the exact same character that he did in american beauty , only in a new neighborhood .
but my biggest kudos go out to sagemiller , who holds her own throughout the entire film , and actually has you feeling her character 's unraveling .
overall , the film does n't stick
because it does n't entertain , it 's confusing , it rarely excites and
it feels pretty redundant for most of its runtime , despite a pretty cool ending and explanation to all of the craziness that came before it .
oh ,
and by the way , this is not a horror or teen slasher flick . . .
it 's just packaged to look that way because someone is apparently assuming that the genre is still hot with the kids .
it also wrapped production two years ago and has been sitting on the shelves ever since .
whatever . .
. skip it !
where 's joblo coming from ?
a nightmare of elm street 3 ( 7/10 ) - blair witch 2 ( 7/10 ) - the crow ( 9/10 ) - the crow : salvation ( 4/10 )
- lost highway ( 10/10 ) - memento ( 10/10 ) - the others ( 9/10 ) - stir of echoes ( 8/10 )
Output: N
The phrases used in the review convey a negative sentiment (e.g. "presents it in a very bad package").

New input case for you: synopsis : a humorless police officer 's life changes when he befriends a super - smart , super - adorable golden retriever named einstein and a cute , young blond scientist .
unfortunately , einstein shares a psychic link with a bigfoot - sized ape - creature trained by the blond scientist to be an unstoppable killing machine , and this rogaine - nightmare is loose and after the dog and the girl .
meanwhile , a group of white , chain - smoking , gun - toting nsa agents in sunglasses and business suits tries to kill all the other characters in the movie .
comments : watchers reborn , a cheaply made direct - to - video turkey
, is the fourth sequel to the first film version of dean koontz 's bestselling novel watchers .
technically , this should have been called watchers v , but it seems that this cycle of horror movies , much like many other sequel - crazy film series , has decided to drop the numbers from the titles .
( even the star trek movies dropped the numbers from their titles after star trek vi . )
the makers of watchers reborn probably want to fool unsuspecting video rental customers into thinking this might be a good movie instead of a crappy fifth installment of a film series which should have died a long time ago .
this really is n't a good movie .
have you ever rented a movie and recieved a sinking feeling about it when you watched the previews preceding the feature presentation ?
well , any hope a viewer may have had , perhaps because he is a fan of novelist dean koontz or actor mark hamill , will be dashed by the time he 's seen the trailers tagged on before the beginning of watchers reborn .
they 're awful .
these commercials cover films like a strange stripper movie called shadow dancer , some weird crap about a dead indian , teens , and wolves , and an " action " movie called detonator starring scott baio .
scott baio !
what idiot dreamed this movie up ?
after surviving these abysmal trailers , the person finally gets to watch the movie he rented : watchers reborn .
"
maybe it wo n't be
* that
* bad " he may say to himself .
" perhaps , just perhaps , the bottom - of - the - barrel film fluff advertised before it is greatly misleading .
watchers reborn , after all , is based on that cool book dean koontz wrote a decade ago .
it stars mark hamill -- luke skywalker himself from that terrific star wars trilogy .
lou rawls is even in the mix !
" unfortunately , the force is certainly no longer with mark hamill ( he looks very sick here ) , and this movie shares only basic plot elements with watchers , the book .
the latter is really too bad .
koontz is a hack writer producing way too many thrillers for his own good , but he is still my favorite hack writer .
koontz has a writing style which is succinct and suspenseful .
people who read many of his books , however , often complain of repetitive plot devices .
it 's definately not a koontz book if there is n't ( 1 ) a psychic , ( 2 ) a super - intelligent dog , or ( 3 ) a psychotic killer who likes ripping out people 's eyeballs .
watchers has all three devices , which may explain why it 's arguably the most popular of koontz 's books .
the idea behind koontz 's novel , though highly implausible , is very interesting .
basically , a biological war machine is created : a smart dog can be released in battle , track down its target , and then relay the target 's position , psychically , to a large creature designed to kill in hand - to - hand combat .
silly but kind of neat too .
i 'm sorry .
i do n't mean to ramble on about matters not directly linked to watchers reborn , the movie .
i suppose i just do n't want to talk about the movie itself .
this turkey is really cheesy .
no one in this movie can act , including mark hamill , and it 's difficult seeing the aged luke skywalker stumble around trying to be the hero .
the cheese factor is only increased when he 's involved in an implied sex scene with the blond biologist / geneticist / zoologist
/ whatever - the - f * * k
- she's - supposed - to - be
whom he befriends .
mercifully
, the filmmakers opted not to do nudity .
to be honest , the only half - convincing actor in the film is the golden retriever who plays einstein .
you know a movie is bad when a dog outacts all of its human counterparts .
i find it difficult to relate how laughable the action sequences are in this movie
.
and the creature !
yes , the creature out after poor einstein is some guy in a furry suit and a mask which poorly imitates
the werewolves in the howling .
this creature is shot about 500 , 000 times , but it 's okay .
the creature has the ability to kill people by swinging his arms around and pushing .
oh , he can also rip body parts off , allowing for many scenes of fake hands and arms being thrown around . cheesy gore .
that 's another main element of watchers reborn .
it has many bloody scenes which are thoroughly unconvincing and only increase the film 's campiness rather than its suspense .
ultimately , i gave watchers reborn a star and a half because bad horror / sci - fi film buffs may get a few kicks out of the film 's silliness ( though this film will tax even their patience -- it 's an 83 minute film , but it feels like four hours ) .
also , i hate to admit , i have survived far worse than this .
anyone who has sat through the christopher lambert and natasha henstridge debacle known as adrenalin : fear the rush will know what i mean .
finally , i could n't help but think that watchers reborn would work well as " bot fodder " for the creative folks behind one of my all - time favorite shows , " mystery science theater 3000 .
"
this thought alone helped me survive watchers reborn with a smile on my face .
rated r , watchers reborn contains dozens of blood - spattered bodies and unconvincing gore .
it also has violence , obviously .
i would n't recommend it for the little kids , but i 'm sure even young teens would make it through this movie okay .
instead of watching this film , however , i recommend reading koontz 's book .
trust me , it 'll be time much , much better spent .
Output:
N