Mark - Are we still moving forward with the LegalOnline updating? At this time, we have completed the background work on the databases (e.g., Confidentiality Agreements, Law Firms/Contacts, etc.) and created the new look and feel. We have not yet implemented the text of the new site and continue to have some problems with the streaming video (we cannot get the tape digitized as necessary because of flaws in the tape itself). In light of current events, please let me know if we are to move forward with the project or not. Thanks.
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: LegalOnline
Ladies and Gentleman: As a follow up to our last Council meeting, we agreed to elaborate and clarify our thoughts on the Global Business Council. Some of those who attended the meeting have already shared thoughts and ideas with us. Now I would like to get input from others on the Council. We intend to complete this process as quickly as possible, as Klaus has requested that we present a reframed charter at the next council meeting in early November. We had intended to launch this project sooner, but events of last two weeks prevented this. I have asked Sunny Misser, US leader of PwC's Sustainability services to assist me in this effort. Sunny will be contacting you in the next few days to understand your thinking and incorporate your perspective in this charter. Additionally, I am including an overview of the process and timetable for your review. As we proceed with this exercise, it would be helpful to understand your thoughts in the following areas: - What are some of the key pressures confronting the WEF - What is the value of creating a Global Business Council - What will the GBC do (i.e. role/function) - How should the GBC be positioned within the WEF - How will we practically implement the GBC Thank you once again for taking the time from your busy schedules to develop this thinking. We will keep you apprised of our progress. Sincerely,
Answer: WEF Council Meeting -- Follow -Up
IN: This is an email
Project OZ The deal team is proceeding post-haste to draft a definitive term sheet. Bjorn - you're correct - term is now 8 years likely to be 10 $40 million working capital facility - advance rate will exceed market - i.e. a portion of this is really equity crack spreads - will be widened (still fine tuning) Minimum investment case - Morgan Stanley bridge, refinery cash flow to supply capex for Tier 2 upgrades, current volumes After closing, to continue investigating expansion (max capex case) with [option] to hedge larger volumes ( ?- what if we don't agree with expansion plans) RAC draft DASH with deal team's comments expected back this afternoon - will circulate promised model by EOD tomorrow anticipate that deal team will try to get approval delegation at the next BOD meeting (about ten days to get thru RAC process)

What is the subject?

OUT:
Update from the Wizard