Sentence 1: Sure, Tuppence, how could he be?

Sentence 2: How would that even be possible?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question:
New corporate and fast-food cultures, along with more freedom of movement among European Union countries and a more international perspective, have further changed the social landscape.

Does it follow that "There was freedom of movement among the European Union countries."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
yes

Q: If forum in an unconventional way to suppress speech inherent in the nature of the medium., can we say that "Speech can be suppressed."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A: yes

Premise:
"After a band of guerrillas captured ex-Cambodian dictator Pol Pot one month ago, many Cambodians began demanding that he be tried for the murder of the millions killed by his regime."
Hypothesis: Pol Pot was released because he was so well loved.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

no

input question: The Department of Defense (DOD) spends close to $100 billion annually to research, develop, and acquire weapon systems, and this investment is expected to grow substantially. If this premise is true, does that tell us:"The investment is mostly put into research."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: it is not possible to tell

Q: If Finally, there is the ILAC Ceter, which is second only to the St. Stephen's Green center., can we say that "St. Stephen's Green center is second only to the ILAC center."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A:
no