In this task, you are given text for US Congressional and California state bills, your task is to generate a summary for this bill.

Example input: SECTION 1. LIABILITY OF BUSINESS ENTITIES PROVIDING USE OF FACILITIES
TO NONPROFIT ORGANIZATIONS.

(a) Definitions.--In this section:
(1) Business entity.--The term ''business entity'' means a
firm, corporation, association, partnership, consortium, joint
venture, or other form of enterprise.
(2) Facility.--The term ''facility'' means any real
property, including any building, improvement, or appurtenance.
(3) Gross negligence.--The term ''gross negligence'' means
voluntary and conscious conduct by a person with knowledge (at
the time of the conduct) that the conduct is likely to be
harmful to the health or well-being of another person.
(4) Intentional misconduct.--The term ''intentional
misconduct'' means conduct by a person with knowledge (at the
time of the conduct) that the conduct is harmful to the health
or well-being of another person.
(5) Nonprofit organization.--The term ''nonprofit
organization'' means--
(A) any organization described in section 501(c)(3)
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and exempt from
tax under section 501(a) of such Code; or
(B) any not-for-profit organization organized and
conducted for public benefit and operated primarily for
charitable, civic, educational, religious, welfare, or
health purposes.
(6) State.--The term ''State'' means each of the several
States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto
Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, the Northern
Mariana Islands, any other territory or possession of the
United States, or any political subdivision of any such State,
territory, or possession.
(b) Limitation on Liability.--
(1) In general.--Subject to subsection (c), a business
entity shall not be subject to civil liability relating to any
injury or death occurring at a facility of the business entity
in connection with a use of such facility by a nonprofit
organization if--
(A) the use occurs outside of the scope of business
of the business entity;
(B) such injury or death occurs during a period
that such facility is used by the nonprofit
organization; and
(C) the business entity authorized the use of such
facility by the nonprofit organization.
(2) Application.--This subsection shall apply--
(A) with respect to civil liability under Federal
and State law; and
(B) regardless of whether a nonprofit organization
pays for the use of a facility.
(c) Exception for Liability.--Subsection (b) shall not apply to an
injury or death that results from an act or omission of a business
entity that constitutes gross negligence or intentional misconduct,
including any misconduct that--
(1) constitutes a crime of violence (as that term is
defined in section 16 of title 18, United States Code) or act
of international terrorism (as that term is defined in section
2331 of title 18) for which the defendant has been convicted in
any court;
(2) constitutes a hate crime (as that term is used in the
Hate Crime Statistics Act (28 U.S.C. 534 note));
(3) involves a sexual offense, as defined by applicable
State law, for which the defendant has been convicted in any
court; or
(4) involves misconduct for which the defendant has been
found to have violated a Federal or State civil rights law.
(d) Superseding Provision.--
(1) In general.--Subject to paragraph (2) and subsection
(e), this Act preempts the laws of any State to the extent that
such laws are inconsistent with this Act, except that this Act
shall not preempt any State law that provides additional
protection from liability for a business entity for an injury
or death with respect to which conditions under subparagraphs
(A) through (C) of subsection (b)(1) apply.
(2) Limitation.--Nothing in this Act shall be construed to
supersede any Federal or State health or safety law.
(e) Election of State Regarding Nonapplicability.--This Act shall
not apply to any civil action in a State court against a business
entity in which all parties are citizens of the State if such State
enacts a statute--
(1) citing the authority of this subsection;
(2) declaring the election of such State that this Act
shall not apply to such civil action in the State; and
(3) containing no other provision.
Example output: Shields a business entity from civil liability relating to any injury or death occurring at a facility of that entity in connection with a use of such facility by a nonprofit organization if: (1) the use occurs outside the scope of business of the business entity; (2) such injury or death occurs during a period that such facility is used by such organization; and (3) the business entity authorized the use of such facility by the organization.
Makes this Act inapplicable to an injury or death that results from an act or omission of a business entity that constitutes gross negligence or intentional misconduct, including misconduct that: (1) constitutes a hate crime or a crime of violence or act of international terrorism for which the defendant has been convicted in any court; or (2) involves a sexual offense for which the defendant has been convicted in any court or misconduct for which the defendant has been found to have violated a Federal or State civil rights law.
Preempts State laws to the extent that such laws are inconsistent with this Act, except State law that provides additional protection from liability. Specifies that this Act shall not be construed to supersede any Federal or State health or safety law.
Makes this Act inapplicable to any civil action in a State court against a business entity in which all parties are citizens of the State if such State, citing this Act's authority and containing no other provision, enacts a statute declaring the State's election that this Act shall not apply to such action in the State.
Example explanation: This Bill focuses on shielding business entities from civil liability relating to an injury or death depending on the conditions of injury, hence the generated summary is correct.
Q: SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ''Flushing Remonstrance Study Act''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

Congress finds the following:
(1) Dutch involvement in North America started with Henry
Hudson's 1609 voyage on the ship, Half Moon, employed by the
Dutch East India Company.
(2) After 1640, New Netherland gradually began to transform
from a chain of trading posts into a settlement colony.
(3) As Dutch and English settlers moved closer to one
another, they began to assimilate in what would later become
Queens County.
(4) The Dutch and English settlements had not been without
conflict. Although the Dutch Republic was well known for its
toleration of other faiths, Director General Peter Stuyvesant
and his council thought that liberty of worship should not be
granted to Quakers.
(5) When Quakers began to arrive in Flushing, the colonial
government issued an ordinance that formally banned the
practice of all religions outside of the Dutch Reformed Church.
(6) On December 27, 1657, 30 Flushing residents signed what
was later called the Flushing Remonstrance, objecting to this
order. None of the remonstrance's authors were Quakers.
(7) Dutch colonial authorities proceeded to arrest the
signers of the Flushing Remonstrance. In 1662, John Bowne
defied the ban and allowed Quakers to hold services in his
house. Bowne was fined and banished to the Dutch Republic for
showing contempt for secular authority.
(8) Bowne was later exonerated after appealing to the
guarantees of religious liberty before the Dutch West India
Company and returned to Flushing in 1664. The colony later fell
to British control on September 24, 1664.
(9) The Flushing Remonstrance is now considered by many to
be instrumental in the development of religious liberty in the
United States and a precursor to the First Amendment to the
United States Constitution.
(10) In 1957, the United States Postal Service released a
3-cent postage stamp commemorating the 300th Anniversary of the
signing of the Flushing Remonstrance which read, ''Religious
Freedom in America''.
(11) Queens remained rural and agricultural through the
18th and 19th Centuries. Although its Dutch identity
diminished, the tolerance of diversity that has harbored
Quakers and other religious sects in the Dutch Colonial period
continues to this day. Queens is the most ethnically diverse
urban area in the world, with a population of over 2,200,000
representing over 100 different nations and speaking over 138
different languages.

SEC. 3. DEFINITIONS.

As used in this Act:
(1) Secretary.--The term ''Secretary'' means the Secretary
of the Interior.
(2) Study area.--The term ''study area'' means the John
Bowne House located at 3701 Bowne Street, Queens, New York, the
Friends Meeting House located at 137-17 Northern Boulevard,
Queens, New York, and other resources in the vicinity of
Flushing related to the history of religious freedom during the
era of the signing of the Flushing Remonstrance.

SEC. 4. SPECIAL RESOURCE STUDY.

(a) Study.--The Secretary shall conduct a special resource study of
the study area.
(b) Contents.--In conducting the study under subsection (a), the
Secretary shall--
(1) evaluate the national significance of the study area's
resources based on their relationship to the history of
religious freedom associated with the signing of the Flushing
Remonstrance;
(2) determine the suitability and feasibility of
designating resources within the study area as a unit of the
National Park System;
(3) consider other alternatives for preservation,
protection, and interpretation of the study area by Federal,
State, or local governmental entities, or private and nonprofit
organizations;
(4) identify properties related to the John Bowne House
that could potentially meet criteria for designation as a
National Historic Landmark;
(5) consult with interested Federal, State, or local
governmental entities, private and nonprofit organizations, or
any other interested individuals;
(6) evaluate the impact of the proposed action on the flow
of commerce and commercial activity, job opportunities, and any
adverse economic effects that could not be avoided if the
proposal is implemented;
(7) identify cost estimates for any Federal acquisition,
development, interpretation, operation, and maintenance
associated with the alternatives;
(8) analyze the effect of the designation of the study area
as a unit of the National Park System on--
(A) existing recreational activities, and on the
authorization, construction, operation, maintenance, or
improvement of energy production and transmission
infrastructure; and
(B) the authority of State and local governments to
manage those activities; and
(9) identify any authorities, including condemnation, that
will compel or permit the Secretary to influence or participate
in local land use decisions (such as zoning) or place
restrictions on non-Federal lands if the study area is
designated a unit of the National Park System.
(c) Notification of Private Property Owners.--Upon the commencement
of the study, owners of private property in or adjacent to the study
area shall be notified of the study's commencement and scope.
(d) Applicable Law.--The study required under subsection (a) shall
be conducted in accordance with section 8(c)) of the National Park
System General Authorities Act (16 U.S.C. 1a-5(c)).
(e) Report.--Not later than 3 years after the date on which funds
are first made available for the study under subsection (a), the
Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Natural Resources of the
House of Representatives and the Committee on Energy and Natural
Resources of the Senate a report containing the results of the study
and any conclusions and recommendations of the Secretary.

Passed the House of Representatives September 15, 2014.

Attest:

KAREN L. HAAS,

Clerk.
A:
(This measure has not been amended since it was reported to the House on April 1, 2014. Flushing Remonstrance Study Act - Directs the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a special resource study of the John Bowne House in Queens, New York, the Friends Meeting House at 137-17 Northern Boulevard, Queens, and other resources in the vicinity of Flushing related to the history of religious freedom during the era of the 1657 signing of the Flushing Remonstrance (the study area). Requires the Secretary to: (1) evaluate the national significance of the study area's resources; (2) determine the suitability and feasibility of designating resources within the study area as a unit of the National Park System (NPS); (3) identify properties related to the John Bowne House that could potentially meet criteria for designation as a National Historic Landmark; (4) evaluate the impact of the proposed action on the flow of commerce and commercial activity, job opportunities, and any adverse economic effects that could not be avoided if the proposal is implemented; (5) analyze the effect of the designation of the study area as an NPS unit on existing recreational activities, and on the authorization, construction, operation, maintenance, or improvement of energy production and transmission infrastructure, and the authority of state and local governments to manage those activities; and (6) identify any authorities, including condemnation, that will compel or permit the Secretary to influence or participate in local land use decisions (such as zoning) or place restrictions on non-federal lands if the study area is designated as an NPS unit. Requires the owners of private property in or adjacent to the study area to be notified of such study's commencement and scope.