Detailed Instructions: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
See one example below:
Problem: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Solution: Yes
Explanation: The comment suggests threat against Trump and his agendas and classified as threatening. Hence, it is a positive example

Problem: She sounds like she could be a welcome addition to that group; she's smart, she is detail-oriented and energetic enough to actually research issues, and her training should come in handy. I suppose she has faults, which Paul Conte has enumerated, but she is only one of many on that group. Her weakness should be balanced by others' strengths.

On the other hand, I find it completely reprehensible that Clair Syrett voted for her based primarily on the configuration of the organs between her legs; and even more so that Syrett didn't even know who the other members on the commission were.
Solution:
No