Given a paragraph about movies and a set of conversational questions and answers about the paragraph, say whether the passage contains sufficient information to answer the follow-up question. Say Yes if it is answerable; otherwise, say No. The paragraph has the prefix 'CONTEXT:'. Each conversation question has a prefix 'Q:' followed by the answer prefix 'A:', and the follow-up question has a prefix 'FOLLOWUP_Q:'.

[EX Q]: CONTEXT: I'd guess the movie's motive for not introducing the McKee subplot is because that was only a minor subplot of the book. And re-telling a book story in movie form, when you've got to get all the key details on screen in just 2 or 3 hours, means you have to omit many minor details. The core story of The Great Gatsby is about Gatsby and the world he lived in, not about Nick or Nick's potential attraction to Gatsby. In book form, there is plenty of room for the subplot suggestion that Nick is gay -- and the author Fitzgerald introduced the suggestion so subtly that most readers miss it. In the movie, however, throwing "Nick might be gay" at viewers along with everything else, in just 2 or 3 hours, could overwhelm them and/or distract from the core story -- and I'm not sure how it could be done as subtly on-screen as Fitzgerald pulled it off in the prose. <sep> Q: Why did the Great Gasby (2013) movie erase the hints of Nick Carraway's homosexuality?
[EX A]: Yes

[EX Q]: CONTEXT: Dev Patel plays the adult Saroo, so he is only in the movie for the last third or so. He's the main character but he's part of the resolution of the plot. It's a judgment call by the Academy, but his screen time is far less than that of the Best Actor nominees this year, so to call his a supporting role seems correct. <sep> Q: Why was Dev Patel nominated for Supporting Actor rather than Best Actor? A: Dev Patel plays the adult Saroo, so he is only in the movie for the last third or so Q: So he wasn't eligible? A: It's a judgment call by the Academy Q: Would he be better suited for a "Supporting Role"? A: his screen time is far less than that of the Best Actor nominees this year, so to call his a supporting role seems correct Q: Is he the main character or the protagonist for the movie Lion? A: He's the main character but he's part of the resolution of the plot Q: Who is the main character? A: Saroo <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Does Saroo have a last name in this film?
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: CONTEXT: We don't know. All we know is that Chiron assaulted him with the chair. Certainly he was injured but we don't know the severity of the injuries. Given that Chiron is only sent to juvie it's extremely unlikely that Terrel was killed. Thus a charge of the Assault variety would seem likely but that is also unknown. We also don't know how long Chiron was in juvie but most age out of the juvenile system at 18, assuming he was tried as a minor. However, there is a 10 year time jump between the assault and when we see Chiron again so any sentence would have been less than that since Chiron has now relocated to another city, is considerably larger than before and is now established as a drug dealer. <sep> Q: What happened to Terrel? A: We don't know Q: What happened to Chiron after this? A: Given that Chiron is only sent to juvie it's extremely unlikely that Terrel was killed Q: what happened to Terrell after the incident as this isn't covered? A: We don't know Q: What else can you tell me about the end of Moonlight or in general? A: there is a 10 year time jump between the assault and when we see Chiron again so any sentence would have been less than that since Chiron has now relocated to another city <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Where was he relocated to?
[EX A]:
Yes