Premise:
"There are no guarantees."
Hypothesis: We can not say that the outcome is certain.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

yes

input question: Then Israeli police said they had arrested an armed Palestinian squad in the process of abducting an Arab land dealer, evidently for execution. If this premise is true, does that tell us:"The police in Israel arrested armed Palestinians while abducting an Arab land dealing that will be executed. "?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: yes

Question:
Based on the premise "3 Who started the fight?", can we conclude that "Who started the axe-battle?"? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
it is not possible to tell

Question: Sentence A: I think neglecting to mention this shows that the Journal 's editorial page lacks intellectual integrity.

Sentence B: Editorial page lacks intellectual integrity, because they neglect to mention this.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Question: My brother-in-law then chastised me for being harsh.
Being harsh led my brother in law to chastise me.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Problem: Here is a premise:
All of the agencies that we examined had IT initiatives in both of these areas, but the size, scope, and specific elements of those initiatives differed both between and within the agencies.

Here is a hypothesis:
All of the agencies had initiates for IT that different greatly.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer:
yes