Question:
Based on the premise "oh my yeah right right yeah i think and i think that's uh uh part of the problem now i was uh uh i was in engineering myself um right now i'm taking uh a year off but uh it was it's very difficult even when i worked i insisted on working thirty hours not forty so i was really considered part time and that was kind of difficult because that concept when you get into professions like that isn't really there yet so i really had to hound them for that i was a civil engineer", can we conclude that "I wanted to work 40 hours."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
no

Question: Sentence A: yeah well i guess we have to get back to hobbies since

Sentence B: I guess we have to get back to hobbies.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Question: The coverage of her day in court was uniformly kind, rarely mentioning that she has lied before and changed her story now.
She was known to have been very consistent in recounting her story.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Problem: Here is a premise:
yeah that they they they claim that's why we're still there i mean you know why only you note it's only only a small number of people have actually come back yet

Here is a hypothesis:
Most people have come back, that's why you're still there.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Sentence 1: investments that return business value in excess of costs) and whether they are investing in technology the right way.

Sentence 2: There's no correct or incorrect way for them to invest in technology.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: no

Premise:
"Hi-Tech Products"
Hypothesis: Low tech products.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
no