Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.

Example Input: I'm tired of reading from various prominent state leaders, not the legislators, that we need "new revenue." OK, Fran, what new revenue? You've served in plenty of high caliber appointed position inside and outside of Alaska, surely you can do better than beat around the bush. The only new revenue that's been kicked around in op-eds is taxes: Tax the PFD, income tax, education head tax ranging from $100-$500 depending on one's income, additional fuel tax, marijuana tax, more cigarette tax, and a statewide sales tax. No on new revenue taxes until the Legislature cuts $50 million from its own budget, and repeals SB21 tax credits.
Example Output: No

Example Input: They also placed themselves above all other leggies in 'Special Elite Council'; they are still 'making decisions' for our money today, right now, in the same pattern as last year, in OT while remideling more buildings. That scam works so good.
Example Output: Yes

Example Input: Amber, I agree with your enthusiasm about solar power, and think everything possible must be done to encourage it. However, attacking coal as a source of electricity generation won't be very useful locally for Lane Community College, since Eugene's power is mostly hydroelectric, and only a trace amount comes from coal (see http://www.eweb.org/resources ). I think your local OSPIRG chapter might be more effective with an "act locally" campaign.
Example Output:
Yes