input question: um you know it used to be that communities would take care of their own and that you know the states would take care of the communities and then all of a sudden everybody starting looking to the federal government If this premise is true, does that tell us:"Communities should look after people, rather than the government"?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: yes

Question:
Based on the premise "The real outrage is that boxing is barbaric.", can we conclude that "Boxing has been losing viewers because it's barbaric."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
it is not possible to tell

Question: Sentence A: That's 8% of the 137,000 workers who lost their offices or access to them when the Twin Towers collapsed.

Sentence B: 80 percent lost their offices during the attack.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question: This proved highly dangerous to pilgrims who approached the abbey across the sands (the causeway joining the island to the mainland was not built until 1874).
The pilgrims accessed the roads leading to the abbey with no trouble.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Problem: Here is a premise:
i think a lot of my problem with the young mothers is

Here is a hypothesis:
I have no problems whatsoever with young mothers.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question:
Lately, however, there is less and less of this in literature.

Does it follow that "Literature always stays the same."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
no