Categorize the comment on the basis of toxicity. If the comment is toxic (harmful, malicious, derogatory, threat, insult, identity attck, etc.) output Yes, otherwise output No.

[Q]: (off topic:griping about RG stories) this is a well done story. Good Job! meaty and a variety of informational input.
[A]: No

[Q]: Don't get too carried away, Kearon, with your radical assumptions. Apparently there's reports that the shooter was GAY. Sooooo, it happens to be a shooter was a wannabe gay individual and couldn't fit in with the gay crowd. Sounds like too much is being emphasized on him being Muslim with Afghanistan ancestral roots. Heck, Kearon, with all the radical, over the cliff comments that you've singlehandedly made on this site, you should be investigated. I'll bet KK is an alias. Really.
[A]: Yes

[Q]: It would be wonderful to have so with higher credentials perform tests. There have been small scale tests performed. There are no retail investors to exploit the potential profits.

Steve is a conservationist, so many of the projects they hope this will support have an environmental focus.

For the salinity concern collection volumes are focused on surplus flow like storm run off. Most of the collection points were designed to be portable to minimize impacts on fishing industry and migratory species.

You can learn more at RiverRecycler.com
[A]:
No