In this task you are given a disfluent question, a proper question and a context. A disfluent question is a question that has some interruptions in it while framing and a proper question is the correct form of the question without any disfluency. Classify whether the question is answerable or not based on the given context.

[EX Q]: proper question: What happens in a phase 2 contract?
disfluent question: What happens in a phase 1 or no make that in a phase 2 contract?
context: The owner produces a list of requirements for a project, giving an overall view of the project's goals. Several D&B contractors present different ideas about how to accomplish these goals. The owner selects the ideas he or she likes best and hires the appropriate contractor. Often, it is not just one contractor, but a consortium of several contractors working together. Once these have been hired, they begin building the first phase of the project. As they build phase 1, they design phase 2. This is in contrast to a design-bid-build contract, where the project is completely designed by the owner, then bid on, then completed.
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: proper question: Where did Maududi's books place Islam?
disfluent question: Where did Maududi's books place Pakistan sorry instead Islam?
context: Sayyid Abul Ala Maududi was an important early twentieth-century figure in the Islamic revival in India, and then after independence from Britain, in Pakistan. Trained as a lawyer he chose the profession of journalism, and wrote about contemporary issues and most importantly about Islam and Islamic law. Maududi founded the Jamaat-e-Islami party in 1941 and remained its leader until 1972. However, Maududi had much more impact through his writing than through his political organising. His extremely influential books (translated into many languages) placed Islam in a modern context, and influenced not only conservative ulema but liberal modernizer Islamists such as al-Faruqi, whose Islamization of Knowledge carried forward some of Maududi's key principles.
[EX A]: Yes

[EX Q]: proper question: Who created assessments that were found to have substantial errors?
disfluent question: Who created assessments that were changed no um found to have substantial errors?
context: Former IPCC chairman Robert Watson has said The mistakes all appear to have gone in the direction of making it seem like climate change is more serious by overstating the impact. That is worrying. The IPCC needs to look at this trend in the errors and ask why it happened. Martin Parry, a climate expert who had been co-chair of the IPCC working group II, said that What began with a single unfortunate error over Himalayan glaciers has become a clamour without substance and the IPCC had investigated the other alleged mistakes, which were generally unfounded and also marginal to the assessment.
[EX A]:
No