This may be too early, but just in case....I will save the good-byes until they become absolutely necessary. Could I have your outside e-mails and possibly your phone #'s? If you feel uncomfortable giving these to me, that is o.k. The following is my information.
Answer: keep in touch
Here is an email: I think this is a Central Desk contract or its one of our agency contract. We have so many. Do you have a Sitara deal number?
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: Reliant Energy Field Services Contract 96034155
Q: Liz: Here is a summary of comments I have not yet incorporated: 1. Fritz raised the point that if Fixed Independent Amount is selected then both parties could be posting collateral. If this occurs, he thinks that only Sections 6, 7 and 9 should apply but that Sections 3 and 4 should not. 2. In clause (b) of the definition of Exposure, should we add language at the end that says: "when such sum is a positive value, and when such sum is a negative value it represents, conversely, Exposure of Party Y to Party X. 3. Fritz wanted to eliminate the "demand" requirement in Section 4 and make collateral posting automatic. 4. Should we eliminate the consent requirement in the last sentence of Section 5(a) (reducing LC's)? 5. Reliant wanted to delete the "mid point" language in the definition of Current mark to Market value. 6. Reliant wants to add to Section 6(b)(iii) the phrase "Secured Party notifies the Pledging party as to the" after the 1 and 5 day triggers such that the delivery requirement begins after notice. 7. Reliant wants to extend the time frames in Section 8. 8. AEP wants to limit the definition of Credit Rating Event to a ratings drop only. 9. AEP wants to add language to the definition of Letter of Credit that requires it to be acceptable to the Secured Party. I will forward to you PacifiCorp's and Duke's comments as I found most of them to be problematic.
Propose a subject line
A: EEI Comments
IN: PW, HPL's spot and base purchases by zone for April 2000 are reported in the attached file. Let me know if you have any questions. D

Generate a subject line.

OUT: April 2000 spot supply
IN: This is an email
<<analysis revision 3.xls>> Kriste: Here is a chart prepared by our statistician indicating adverse impact based on the spreadsheet that we received on Monday. As we have discussed before, the more relevant statistics are the job group numbers and not the gross statistics. Allan King also called me after he sent me this and said that Rob Speakman (the statistician) also said that he was able to compare the HR staff selected for layoff versus the HR general population and there was statistically significant adverse impact of 10 on gender and 12 on African-American. He asked if this group was selected as a group or if this was an amalgamation of HR employees from the various operating companies. I said that I thought that there was at least a component of a centralized decisionmaking. Accordingly, we probably need to discuss those statistics. Give me a call when you receive this. Kerry E Notestine Littler Mendelson, PC 1900 Chevron Tower 1301 McKinney Street Houston, Texas 77010

What is the subject?

OUT: Revised statistics
Please generate a GISB for Jared using the attached. Let's discuss their addendum. I don't think we will use it. Let's get a copy of our current interruptible agreement so that we can see what has been previously agreed to.
Answer:
GISB contract info