Premise:
"You're always here for me."
Hypothesis: You're never here when I need you.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

no

input question: They also promised to try to solve their border dispute over Kashmir. If this premise is true, does that tell us:"The military officers promised that they would work to resolve the dispute. "?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: it is not possible to tell

Question:
Based on the premise "Well, there it is, you see what you are pitting yourselves against? ", can we conclude that "You are going against a very dangerous element."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
it is not possible to tell

Question: Sentence A: Opposing counsel and parties could seek to compromise the alien client's rights by delaying the litigation or intentionally filing discovery and other motions when they know the client is out of the country and unrepresented.

Sentence B: By delaying the litigation or intentionally filling discovery and other motions, the opposing counsel and parties could seek to compromise the alien client's rights, when they know that he is out of the country and unrepresented.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Question: Make an early start, travel by RER (see page 103), and you can fit in a morning tour of part of the palace.
The RER does not run until late afternoon.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Problem: Here is a premise:
That is, the features of a case study that are appropriate for answering one kind of evaluation question are not necessarily appropriate for answering another kind of evaluation question.

Here is a hypothesis:
There is only one kind of evaluation questions.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer:
no