In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: Not a chance in hell Michael. Joe Miller is not even remotely a Libertarian. He's a right-wing neo conservative religious authoritarian nut-job. Who the hell am I supposed to vote for now?

Output: Agree

Input: Consider Input: Comment: "Academic extremism comes to Canada"

Well, that may be so, and/or it is just an opinion of a Globe and Mail "freelancer"

On the other hand/in the real world, far right extremism has been on a steady rise and has come to the cesspool surface in the United States and "parts " of Canada, bolstered/empowered by the Trump Presidential campaign and subsequent win

The amount and frequency of far right white-supremacy, anti-Semitic, homophobic, Muslim hating violent bullying has increased ten-fold in the past year, yet, it has been swept under the carpet by the right-wing across Canada and the United States, a right-wing that refuses to take responsibility for this lunatic fringe.

Time to look in the mirror Ladies and Gentlemen of the "right"/Conservatives, time to clean up your "house" before pointing fingers at others
.

Output: Disagree

Input: Consider Input: Comment: too bad she didn't point out Coderre's hypocrisy. He wails against a pipeline but crows he is an environmentalist by dumping billions of litres of raw sewage into the St Lawrence
Output: Agree