IN: This is an email
Joe, Based on our discussions, the facts are as follows: Prior to 12/2/01, ENA sold gas to One Oak. During the period 12/4-12/31/01, Duke Field Services inadvertently flowed gas on the MRT pipeline to ENA. ENA used the gas received from Duke Field Services to fulfill its obligations under the sales agreement to One Oak. ENA is obligated to pay Duke Field Services for the gas it received and later delivered to One Oak because this event occurred post-petition and benefited ENA. Shemin

What is the subject?

OUT: Duke Field Services
QUESTION: Greg, Check out a company called Opus 360 for recruiting IT people (www.opus360.com). It might be a good investment for the equity group too (OPUS). Fletch
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: IT Professionals
Just got off the phone with the lawyer. We have only minor comments and he needs to check with his credit people regarding the collateral threshold. I will wait to hear back before sending out a revision. Sara
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: NY State Gas & Electric
This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification. Your message has been successfully relayed to the following recipients, but the requested delivery status notifications may not be generated by the destination. anthonydensieski@nymex.com
Answer: Delivery Status Notification (Relay)
Here is an email: Zimin, I have talked to Alex about it. I don't think that the additional seminars will crowd out the brown bag lunches. The seminars are really targeted to people who recently joined the group and have very limited, or zero, exposure to energy markets. For most members of the group it should be the piece of cake. Brown bag lunches are not that time intensive, except for the speaker. Plus, we ran out of days available for lunch meetings. Vince
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: Friday Brown Bag Lunch on Option Pricing
QUESTION: Judge Birchman's November 23rd Order sets January 8, 2002 as the hearing date for 202(c) issues. As we discussed during the November 20th phone conference, the witness for the State Water Contractors, Richard Jones, is not available for cross examination on January 8th. As we agreed during the phone conference, Mr. Jones will be available during the December hearing dates for cross examination on the 202(c) issues. Since he will be traveling in for the hearings we need to set a date within the December hearings when the cross examination (if any) will take place. We suggest that he be available on December 21st, the last day of the December hearings. If anyone prefers that he be available on a different date, please advise us by the end of the this week (November 30th) so that travel plans can be made. Sincerely,
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS:
Additional Schedule Clarification - 202(c) witness availability