Q: This is an email to let you know that the September 2001 release of NEWGen is available on www.rdionline.com. The NEWGen BETA 2000 version will be available next week. Please email newgen@ftenergy.com if you would like to be notified. Thank you,
Propose a subject line
A: NEWGen September 2001 release

Q: This deal discrepancy seems to have a few of us stumped - so I'm referring it to all of you in hopes that we can solve this today. Following are the terms of the deal: Short Term California buys Enron Energy Services Hours: HE 6-9 Delivery Point: SP-15 Term: 3/29/01 Price: $110 The deal was entered by Bert Meyers, a Real Time trader, on behalf of STCA. It was extended for HE 9 through 22 at a price of $160. In the spreadsheet Real Time sends to EES each day, it shows the deal as a sale at a price of $130, not a buy at a price of $160. My first instinct was to simply modify the spreadsheet to match the deal in Enpower, but EES claims they see the price coming across as $130. I'm reluctant to send any more incorrect information to EES, as we've already dealt with enough confusion over this matter. Please take a look at the deal and its corresponding documents, and let me know which is the correct price. Thanks for your help,
Propose a subject line
A: EPMI/EES Discrepancies - Deal 564094

Q: Attached is a draft of the turnkey construction contract for your review. Ron, As we discussed, Exhibit A - Scope of Work will need to be included. Please note the following points: 1. Liquidated Damages - Need to assess a value for these damages. 2. Force Majeure - This would currently provide EE&CC with relief from the In-Service Date requirements and consequently, the LDs. Is this acceptable? 3. Permitting - Need to specify in Exhibit F, those permits that ENA would secure, and make EE&CC responsible for any others. 4. Utility Coordination - Currently this is very generally. Are there specific responsibilities that should be stated in this Agreement wrt the Utility? Please review with these in mind. I will be out tommorrow and Friday. Let's plan on meeting Monday to discuss the draft.
Propose a subject line
A: Mooring Facility Construction

Q: Please be advised that the California Power Exchange Corporation has received a deposition subpoena from the California State Senate Select Committee to investigate price manipulation of the wholesale energy market. The subpoena seeks the testimony of George Sladoje, Chief Executive Officer, of the CalPX. Mr. Sladoje is scheduled to testify pursuant to the subpoena on April 2, 2002 at the legislative office Building, 1020 N Street, Room 288, Sacramento, California. The subpoena also seeks the production of the following documents, some of which may be considered confidential under Section 19.3.2 of the CalPX Tariff: 1. Any and all documents relating to the Market Monitoring Committee, including, but not limited to, any and all reports prepared by or for said Committee, notes, e-mail memorandum, correspondence, drafts, and documents supporting any Committee reports. 2. Any and all documents relating to the market compliance Unit including but not limited t, any and all reports prepared by or for said Committee notes, e-mails, memorandum, correspondence, drafts, and documents supporting any Committee reports. Counsel for the Senate Select Committee has stated that the confidential materials provided by CalPX in response to this subpoena will be treated by the Senate Select Committee in accordance with the terms of the May 15, 2001 letter from Senator Joseph L. Dunn that was previously posted on the CalPX web site. If you desire to assert a claim of confidentiality or privilege, you should direct your written statement by March 26, 2002 to the following:
Propose a subject line
A:
Deposition Subpoena by the California State Senate Select Committee