Here is an email: Bob Shults called this meeting to see what the status was for the different product groups' confirmation and GTC forms. The two issues out of the meeting I was asked to bring to your attention were: 1. Attaching the Online GTC's to the outgoing confirmations. Per our discussion, it was my understanding that the GTC's would be attached to all outgoing confirmations. That does not seem to be the general consensus. There seems to be feedback from London that is not the case, and Janice Moore was also saying she didn't know if that's what the liquids people were going to do. Bob Shults asked for your direction with these holdouts. 2. The issue of the credit in the masters being overriden. First, after our discussions yesterday, we couldn't figure out a way they could change the approval status within Credit from approved with a master to a "B" approved GTC with credit. Second, Bob Shults thought that had been agreed to have the credit overridefor all the product areas and I told him that financial was still discussing this issue with Credit, so we would have to get back to him. I guess the physical people are OK with that. I don't know what discussions you have had with Jeff and Alan, but Bob Shults appears to want to have this confirmed for him. Also, along with the credit override of the master, there is supposed to be some letter that will be sent out to the counterparties. Who will be drafting that letter and will it be the same for all product groups?
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: Online Confirmation Meeting
Here is an email: Jeff and Sue: The Governor proposed the following energy-related budget cuts today: Biomass Grant Program - Revert $5.5 million of the $11.5 million budget back to the General Fund. The program provides grants to operators of biomass plants to offset loses. Renewable Energy Loan Guarantee Fund - Revert $29.9 million back to the General Fund. The program would have required the Trade and Commerce Agency to guarantee loans made by financial institutions to eligible businesses for the permitting, manufacturing, acquisition, construction, or installation of renewable energy systems that are intended to decrease demand on the grid. Powerwalk Program - Revert $3.2 million of the $20 million budget back to the General Fund. The program requires the Conservation Corps to distribute energy efficiency information and light bulbs in low income communities. Agricultural Peak Demand - Revert $29.4 million of the $86.3 million budget back to the General Fund. The program requires the state to provide grants to the agriculture industry to install energy efficient hardware. Expedited Siting Applications - Revert $3 million back to the General Fund. The program would have aided local governments by enabling them to hire additional consultants to review siting applications. Power Plant Construction Bonuses - Revert $14 million of the $20 million budget back to the General Fund. The program provided bonuses to power plant owners who got their plants on-line within a specified time period. Renewable Energy Program - Revert $24.9 million of the $25 million budget back to the General Fund. The program would have required the state to establish a renewable energy program to provide financial assistance to public power entities, independent generators, utilities, or businesses manufacturing renewable energy generation components or systems, or both, to generate new and renewable energy sources. Oil and Natural Gas Pumping - Revert $9.6 million back to the General Fund. The program would have provided for energy efficiency audits of various oil and natural gas facilities.
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: Budget Cuts
Here is an email: Dave would like to have a strategy meeting next Tuesday Ocotober 10, 2000 from 2:30-4:30 in room 30C1. No preparation is necessary and it's important that each of you plan to attend. If you cannot attend, please contact Dave directly. Thanks!
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A:
Strategy Meeting