Q: Richard, Hello from South America. I am forwarding this email from John regarding the J-Block problems. Have you been involved in this? What are your thoughts? If you have any ideas or can provide with some help, please follow-up. This is confidential but i thought you could help. When he mentioned this, I really couldn't remember much. Amazing how the memory fades on some of the details in just a few years. Mike
Propose a subject line
A: J-Block
IN: Barrie was awesome!! 12 points on Arizona!! The Bears, CLEVELAND, Seattle, Tampa Bay - that is some kind of crystal ball! And she went from seventh to first place overall. Winners for the week are: 1st place - Barrie 2nd place - Narvco 3rd place - Cindy 4th place - Cameron & Scott Four people sat down with their Philadelphia pick: Cameron & Scott, Hank, Mickey, and Mike & Lisa - leaves 12 standing The pick sheet for the games originally planned as Week 6 is attached.

Generate a subject line.

OUT: Results from Week "5" games
IN: This is an email
Tana, There are about 20-30 deals in pending sent to legal status that are Riskmantra vs. EGM. My question is should we even be doing trades with Enron Gas Marketing. And if we should, can we set up an ISDA with RMT with an effective date of 9/5/01? Thanks,

What is the subject?

OUT: Riskmantra vs. EGM
QUESTION: Before I took on the ERCOT responsibilities, I was working with other EPSA members in preparation for the upcoming DOE sponsored forum to develop a wholesale electric standards setting organanization. Since my move, it is likely that I will not be attending this workshop. I have been an instrumental part in pushing for the formation of the wholesale electric quadrant of EISB. Although I have not committed to making a presentation at this workshop, there was a possibility that I would be speaking on behalf of EPSA. The meeting is a critical juncture for the EISB vs NERC showdown. NERC will likely present its latest restructuring proposal which includes a 9 sector model. I and other EPSA members have been advocating much fewer sectors for EISB. A key point of the NERC proposal is that it may be able to accomodate an EISB approval process for standards. This is imporatant in that it may be able to resolve the dichotomy between NERC expertise/infrastructure and EISB's reknowned (including FERC) consensus building process. NERC could retain its standards development expertise, however, lose its biased voting process. I think it is important to have coverage for this meeting, either, by someone on the NERC team or someone close to NERC in Washington. The likely outcome of this meeting is a solidifying of industry support for either the NERC approach, or a clean slate EISB approach. Jim would like for us to have a conference call to discuss. I am available Monday, Wed, and Fri. Charles X30348
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: DOE Meeting Dec 7th
Hi Dale, Just got your email re assignment out of TurboPark. Here are the draft documents being reviewed by the lender for the movement of equipment out of TurboPark. Kay
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: CA Development agreements
Kathy/Brian, As I'm sure you know we are trying to determine what is causing the Canadian VAR to be so high. One possible cause that we would like your help investigating is the Curve Codes that are being loaded in the position files that are manually loaded into the system each night. It is my understanding that positions will be correct even if the curves loaded are spelled incorrectly. However, incorrect curve names will result in the positions not being captured in the VAR calculation. Please verify that all the curves are spelled correctly in all position files. Please give me a call if you have any questions. Thanks,
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer:
Canada VAR