[QUESTION] Premise: "A brown dog shakes off water after exiting a natural pond."
Hypothesis: "The dog shook water onto a nearby person."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
No evidence there was a person any where near the brown down when he shakes off water.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

Q: Premise: "Several people in beach chairs and on beach towels sitting in the sand."
Hypothesis: "Several people are in the boat."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A: Several people cannot be in beach chairs if they are on a boat.
The answer is no.

QUESTION: Premise: "A person is in the ocean in the boat wearing life jacket."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "The person is inside a building." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Let's solve it slowly: One cannot be inside a building and in the ocean in the boat simultaneously.
The answer is no.

[QUESTION] Given the sentence "Two men are sitting in a restaurant." can we conclude that "Two associates sitting down to lunch."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Not all men sitting in a restaurant are associates sitting down to lunch.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

Q: Can we conclude from "A children with a helmet riding his bicycle." that "A child rides a bike."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
A: Children is meant to be child because A is singular. Bike is a short term for bicycle. Riding is the suffix form of rides.
The answer is yes.

[QUESTION] Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "A young baseball player is pointing a finger in the face of a player on the other team."
Hypothesis: "The baseball game has been rained out."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
Pointing a finger at another player on the other team does not show that the game was rained out.
The answer is no.