In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Example Input: Comment: While the childs life is very important however your argument about Medevac @ OMC is so spot on! I value them trees. people forget just how much we do need trees to live. Its not about being 'tree huggers' its just plain freaking common sense. Top the damn things.
Example Output: Obscene

Example Input: Comment: Sue his ass amen! The PERMANENT fund dividend is based off a system that replenishes its self every year. If we don't have as good of a year then the PFD would be less. Based off a 5 year average. He wants to cut the money that we would be putting back into the economy to bail out the states fuck ups. How about the state pay for there own mistakes and stop with all the dump road projects like upgrading our high way to 6-8 lanes. We don't need that. Slow down take your time or drive a different rout. Or all the money there wasting on bridges to no where. Or there own salaries. Don't cut the PFD.
Example Output: Obscene

Example Input: Comment: Incredible ignorance. Gays are naturally gay from their gestation in an event known as epigenesis. "Natural complemetarity" is a conceptual model, not a reality. It is made up, like-the concept of the natural order._It is placing piety over reality.
Example Output:
Non-obscene