In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Comment: "All" is not completely honest. "All so far" would be. But since the SCOTUS has agreed to hear the case, how a potential 5-4 vote might go is unknown.
-
Besides, the issue is simple: He didn't refuse to serve a customer because the customer was gay, a neo-Nazi, Hillary Clinton, or a police officer (as some personnel at some restaurants have done).
-
He simply refused to use his artistic talents to create a piece of "edible art work" that was offensive to him. In this case it was a "gay wedding cake" but even Hypocritical Liberals would admit he would be right to refuse to decorate a "black man being lynched" for a racist or a swastika cake foe a neo-Nazi......because the issue is not the "customer" but the issue is the "art work" being created.
-
So the hypocrites are the liberals....who will gladly defend his right to decline to decorate cakes they find offensive, but will curse him for declining to decorate cakes they don't.
Non-sexual-explicit