input: Make use of the article to answer the questions. We know the famous ones--the Thomas Edisons and the Alexander Graham Bells--but what about the less famous inventors? What about the people who invented the traffic light and the windshield wiper ? Shouldn't we know who they are?

Joan Mclean thinks so.In fact,Mclean,a professor of physics at Mountain University in Range,feels so strongly about this matter that she's developed a course on the topic.In addition to learning"who"invented"what",however,Mclean also likes her students to learn the answers to the"why''and''how"questions.According to Mclean."When students learn the answers to these questions,they are better prepared to recognize opportunities for inventing and more motivated to give inventing a try.''

Her students agree.One young man with a patent for an unbreakable umbrella is walking proof of McLean's statement."If I had not heard the story of the windshield wiper's invention,"said Tommy Lee, a senior physics major,"I never would have dreamed of turning my bad experience during a rainstorm into something so constructive."Lee is currently negotiating to sell his patent to an umbrella producer.

So,just what is the story behind the windshield wiper Well,Mary Anderson came up with the idea in 1902 after a visit to New York City.The day was cold and stormy,but Anderson still wanted to see the sights,so she jumped aboard a streetcar.Noticing that the driver was struggling to see through the snow covering the windshield,she found herself wondering why there couldn't be a built--in device for cleaning the window.Still wondering about this when she returned home to Birmingham,Alabama, Anderson started drafting out solutions.One of her ideas,a lever on the inside of a vehicle that would control an arm on the outside,became the first windshield wiper.

Today we benefit from countless inventions and innovations.It's hard to imagine driving without Garrett A.Morgan's traffic light.It's equally impossible to picture a world without Katherine J.Blodgett's innovation that makes glass invisible.Can you picture life without clear windows and eyeglasses? 1. where does Joan Mclean teach?
2. in?
3. what subject does she teach?
4. what course is she running?
5. how many othr questions does she like students to answer?
6. what are they?
7. what does this do for the students?
8. and?
9. Who invented the traffic light?
10. what did Kaltherine Blodgett innovate?
11. which is used in what?
12. Do Prof McLean's students agree with her?
13. What patent is mentioned?
14. who designed it?
15. what inspired him?
16. and waht story?
17. who invented them?
18. when?
19. where had she visited?
20. what was the weather?
numbered_answers: 1. Mountain University
2. Range
3. physics
4. learning"who"invented"what"
5. Two
6. the"why''and''how"
7. better prepared to recognize opportunities for inventing
8. more motivated to give inventing a try.'
9. Garrett A.Morgan
10. making glass invisible
11. windows and eyeglasses
12. yes
13. an unbreakable umbrella
14. Tommy Lee
15. a bad experience during a rainstorm
16. the story of the windshield wiper's invention
17. Mary Anderson
18. in 1902
19. New York City
20. cold and stormy

input: Make use of the article to answer the questions. The latest chapter in Amanda Knox's long legal battle began Monday in Florence, Italy, with a retrial over the 2007 killing of her British roommate Meredith Kercher.

But Knox, 26, who has expressed concern about returning to a country where she spent four years behind bars, was not in court.

Neither was Kercher's family, which said in a statement submitted by their lawyer in court on Monday that they would be following the new trial closely from the United Kingdom.

Knox was convicted in 2009 of murdering Kercher, a 21-year old British exchange student who was found stabbed to death in November 2007 in the villa the two young women rented in the central Italian university town of Perugia.

Family: Amanda Knox won't return to Italy for new trial

The convictions of Knox and her ex-boyfriend, Raffaele Sollecito, were overturned in 2011 for "lack of evidence."

After her acquittal, Knox returned to her hometown of Seattle, where she has been living since.

Knox: Sometimes, I can't stop crying

But Italy's Supreme Court decided last year to retry the case, saying the jury that acquitted Knox didn't consider all the evidence, and that discrepancies in testimony needed to be answered.

The retrial's opening day Monday was dominated by procedural items. The presiding judge, Alessandro Nencini, read out the facts of the case, including the conviction of Ivory Coast native Rudy Guede for his role in Kercher's murder.

The defense teams asked for several items of evidence to be retested for DNA, and Nencini agreed that a knife found in Sollecito's apartment would be re-examined. The court also agreed to hear testimony from Luciano Aviello, who served time in jail with Sollecito and claims that his brother killed Kercher. 1. Where did Knox's legal battle start?
2. what was she convicted of?
3. What is her home town?
4. When was she convicted?
5. Is she in prison now?
6. Why not?
7. Why did that happen?
8. When was Kercher found stabbed to death?
9. Will she be back in Italy for the retrial?
10. Why not?
numbered_answers: 1. Italy
2. killing of her roommate
3. Seattle
4. 2009
5. No
6. The jury acquitted
7. They didn't consider all the evidence.
8. November 2007
9. No
10. Knox has expressed concern about returning.

input: Make use of the article to answer the questions. CHAPTER LXXVIII - MISS LONGESTAFFE AGAIN AT CAVERSHAM

All this time Mr Longestaffe was necessarily detained in London while the three ladies of his family were living forlornly at Caversham. He had taken his younger daughter home on the day after his visit to Lady Monogram, and in all his intercourse with her had spoken of her suggested marriage with Mr Brehgert as a thing utterly out of the question. Georgiana had made one little fight for her independence at the Jermyn Street Hotel. 'Indeed, papa, I think it's very hard,' she said.

'What's hard? I think a great many things are hard; but I have to bear them.'

'You can do nothing for me.'

'Do nothing for you! Haven't you got a home to live in, and clothes to wear, and a carriage to go about in,--and books to read if you choose to read them? What do you expect?'

'You know, papa, that's nonsense.'

'How do you dare to tell me that what I say is nonsense?'

'Of course there's a house to live in and clothes to wear; but what's to be the end of it? Sophia, I suppose, is going to be married.'

'I am happy to say she is,--to a most respectable young man and a thorough gentleman.'

'And Dolly has his own way of going on.'

'You have nothing to do with Adolphus.'

'Nor will he have anything to do with me. If I don't marry what's to become of me? It isn't that Mr Brehgert is the sort of man I should choose.' 1. What is the chapter called?
2. Where did Mr Longestaffe take his daughter?
3. When?
4. Who was she considering marrying?
5. Did he approve?
6. What did Georgiana say?
7. What was she fighting for?
8. Where?
9. What did she say he could do for her?
10. Did papa agree?
11. What does he provide?
12. Did she understand him?
13. What did she call it?
14. Who did she use to support her argument?
15. What happening to her?
16. To who?
numbered_answers:
1. MISS LONGESTAFFE AGAIN AT CAVERSHAM
2. home
3. the day after his visit to Lady Monogram
4. Mr Brehgert
5. No
6. 'Indeed, papa, I think it's very hard,'
7. her independence
8. Jermyn Street Hotel
9. nothing
10. No
11. a home, clothes, a carriage, and books
12. No
13. nonsense
14. Sophia
15. she is going to be married.'
16. a respectable young man