Question:
Based on the premise "that uh the government uh the Salvadorian government you know really gotten out of hand yet the uh right wing death squad type situation i believe that that was beginning to form but i don't i i wasn't really aware of it's being you know terribly uh you know rapid at the time that that i was down there i think that really kind of developed a little bit later on but uh our policies seem to be pretty much one of uh you know trying to setup businesses down there and use the one resource anyway that Salvador had plenty of and that was people we didn't seem to be going in and taking anything out of the country other than just it's it's labor", can we conclude that "The Salvadorian government taxes businesses to the point where it's not sustainable to stay in business."?
****
Answer:
it is not possible to tell

Question:
Based on the premise "Monsieur Poirot, I am sure you agree with me that the facts are very suggestive."", can we conclude that "I think the information points to a conclusion."?
****
Answer:
yes

Question:
Based on the premise "The law specified that if the referendum were ruled unconstitutional, poker would be banned in July 2000.", can we conclude that "The law specified that poker would still be banned if the referendum were ruled constitutional."?
****
Answer:
no