IN: I am trying to set this thing up to go in front of the Cash Committee on Monday. I assume this is your final review.....Joe is cool with what I forwarded him. After your final changes, I'll forward to Chip, Rich and Doug Sewell...and let them know Monday is the day. Thanks. You are a big help and I really admire your skill set....seriously, I do. I want to be like you when I grow up. chris

Generate a subject line.

OUT: Centana Batch
IN: This is an email
Holli: We need to talk about status. I spoke yesterday with three EWEB lawyers and Dick Varner. I have to comment back on the Schedule to the master agreement. EWEB has not yet reviewed the Credit Support Annex and needs to submit their proposed legal opinion. EWEB is reserving discussion of the confirmations pending resolution of the master agreement. Most important, however, is the EWEB legal opinion which will be limited by the capacity of EWEB's traders to enter into financial trades at any given point in time. EWEB is insisting that we assume the obligation of knowing whether an EWEB trader is authorized to act and how that EWEB trader is authorized to act under EWEB's trading policy because, under Oregon law (and the law of all states), financial trades executed by unauthorized persons (employed by governmental entities) are completely void. Your two trades (which began as physical deals and were transformed into financial deals) were authorized by EWEB's recent board resolution. However, you cannot rely fully on this resolution for future trades. Before you ever trade with EWEB again, you will not be able to rely upon your past relationship with an EWEB trader. You will first have to conduct some due diligence with respect to the EWEB trader and the EWEB trading policy. ENA has never agreed to this type of arrangement. Let's schedule a time to discuss the agreement further. Thanks. Sara

What is the subject?

OUT: EWEB
QUESTION: Sara, Jeff Kinneman has suggested that perhaps legal could scan the executed document and edit the signature pages as opposed to recreate it since CSFB cannot provide the word document we requested. However we decide to pursue this is still a priority as we are now shut off from trading. Please advise as to what time frame we can expect the document to be completed. Thanks,
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: CSFB agreement
Agustin Perez is wanting to send out a confirmation for YD9296.1 (currently booked to the old name Petrotemex, S.A. de C.V.) by this afternoon, if at all possible. Do we have enough "lead time" to get this out today? Thanks,
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: Today's Deal with Grupo Petrotemex, S.A. de C.V.
You are invited to attend a Netco meeting scheduled for this afternoon, Wednesday, January 2, 2002 at 1:30 in conference room ECS05990. If you have any questions or require any additional information please call me at extension 3-0402. Thank you,
Answer: Netco Meeting - Wednesday, January 2, 2002
Q: The place (outside) is a mess and needs some clean-up (e.g., get all that old wood out of the front yard, whack down the weeds). Possible for you guys to come up next Wednesday night and we can do a quick clean up on Thursday. I'm going to try to hire a hauling company to help us and haul it away. If Cameron has to work are you available? Best,
Propose a subject line
A:
Memorial Day