In this task, you are given text for US Congressional and California state bills, your task is to generate a summary for this bill.

Let me give you an example: SECTION 1. LIABILITY OF BUSINESS ENTITIES PROVIDING USE OF FACILITIES
TO NONPROFIT ORGANIZATIONS.

(a) Definitions.--In this section:
(1) Business entity.--The term ''business entity'' means a
firm, corporation, association, partnership, consortium, joint
venture, or other form of enterprise.
(2) Facility.--The term ''facility'' means any real
property, including any building, improvement, or appurtenance.
(3) Gross negligence.--The term ''gross negligence'' means
voluntary and conscious conduct by a person with knowledge (at
the time of the conduct) that the conduct is likely to be
harmful to the health or well-being of another person.
(4) Intentional misconduct.--The term ''intentional
misconduct'' means conduct by a person with knowledge (at the
time of the conduct) that the conduct is harmful to the health
or well-being of another person.
(5) Nonprofit organization.--The term ''nonprofit
organization'' means--
(A) any organization described in section 501(c)(3)
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and exempt from
tax under section 501(a) of such Code; or
(B) any not-for-profit organization organized and
conducted for public benefit and operated primarily for
charitable, civic, educational, religious, welfare, or
health purposes.
(6) State.--The term ''State'' means each of the several
States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto
Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, the Northern
Mariana Islands, any other territory or possession of the
United States, or any political subdivision of any such State,
territory, or possession.
(b) Limitation on Liability.--
(1) In general.--Subject to subsection (c), a business
entity shall not be subject to civil liability relating to any
injury or death occurring at a facility of the business entity
in connection with a use of such facility by a nonprofit
organization if--
(A) the use occurs outside of the scope of business
of the business entity;
(B) such injury or death occurs during a period
that such facility is used by the nonprofit
organization; and
(C) the business entity authorized the use of such
facility by the nonprofit organization.
(2) Application.--This subsection shall apply--
(A) with respect to civil liability under Federal
and State law; and
(B) regardless of whether a nonprofit organization
pays for the use of a facility.
(c) Exception for Liability.--Subsection (b) shall not apply to an
injury or death that results from an act or omission of a business
entity that constitutes gross negligence or intentional misconduct,
including any misconduct that--
(1) constitutes a crime of violence (as that term is
defined in section 16 of title 18, United States Code) or act
of international terrorism (as that term is defined in section
2331 of title 18) for which the defendant has been convicted in
any court;
(2) constitutes a hate crime (as that term is used in the
Hate Crime Statistics Act (28 U.S.C. 534 note));
(3) involves a sexual offense, as defined by applicable
State law, for which the defendant has been convicted in any
court; or
(4) involves misconduct for which the defendant has been
found to have violated a Federal or State civil rights law.
(d) Superseding Provision.--
(1) In general.--Subject to paragraph (2) and subsection
(e), this Act preempts the laws of any State to the extent that
such laws are inconsistent with this Act, except that this Act
shall not preempt any State law that provides additional
protection from liability for a business entity for an injury
or death with respect to which conditions under subparagraphs
(A) through (C) of subsection (b)(1) apply.
(2) Limitation.--Nothing in this Act shall be construed to
supersede any Federal or State health or safety law.
(e) Election of State Regarding Nonapplicability.--This Act shall
not apply to any civil action in a State court against a business
entity in which all parties are citizens of the State if such State
enacts a statute--
(1) citing the authority of this subsection;
(2) declaring the election of such State that this Act
shall not apply to such civil action in the State; and
(3) containing no other provision.
The answer to this example can be: Shields a business entity from civil liability relating to any injury or death occurring at a facility of that entity in connection with a use of such facility by a nonprofit organization if: (1) the use occurs outside the scope of business of the business entity; (2) such injury or death occurs during a period that such facility is used by such organization; and (3) the business entity authorized the use of such facility by the organization.
Makes this Act inapplicable to an injury or death that results from an act or omission of a business entity that constitutes gross negligence or intentional misconduct, including misconduct that: (1) constitutes a hate crime or a crime of violence or act of international terrorism for which the defendant has been convicted in any court; or (2) involves a sexual offense for which the defendant has been convicted in any court or misconduct for which the defendant has been found to have violated a Federal or State civil rights law.
Preempts State laws to the extent that such laws are inconsistent with this Act, except State law that provides additional protection from liability. Specifies that this Act shall not be construed to supersede any Federal or State health or safety law.
Makes this Act inapplicable to any civil action in a State court against a business entity in which all parties are citizens of the State if such State, citing this Act's authority and containing no other provision, enacts a statute declaring the State's election that this Act shall not apply to such action in the State.
Here is why: This Bill focuses on shielding business entities from civil liability relating to an injury or death depending on the conditions of injury, hence the generated summary is correct.

OK. solve this:
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ''School Violence Prevention Act of
2005''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS AND STATEMENT OF POLICY.

(a) Findings.--Congress finds the following:
(1) In 1997, the Department of Education, in collaboration
with the National Institute of Justice of the Department of
Justice, conducted a Study on School Violence and Prevention,
to investigate the extent of problem behavior in schools
nationally. The study reported on several aspects of
delinquency prevention efforts in schools, such as types and
quality of prevention efforts, how schools plan and use
information about prevention options to improve their own
efforts and school management, and sources of funding for
school prevention activities.
(2) In a follow up report prepared for the Department of
Education, entitled ''Wide Scope, Questionable Quality, Three
Reports from the Study on School Violence and Prevention''
(2002), experts made a number of findings based on the 1997
Study on School Violence and Prevention.
(3) A significant finding from the 2002 study is that
schools can improve the quality of violence prevention through
attention to needs assessment, planning, increased used of
research-based approaches, and monitoring of implementation.
(4) The 2002 study also noted that middle school students
and teachers were more likely to be victimized than their high
school counterparts, suggesting that this is an area for
additional attention.
(5) Additionally, while many students and teachers reported
feeling safe in their schools, about one-fourth of students and
teachers said they would avoid a specific place at school out
of fear that someone might hurt or bother them, and 27 percent
of teachers in middle and high schools reported that the
behavior of some students kept them from teaching a fair amount
or a great deal, indicating that school safety is still an
issue of concern.
(6) The Safe and Drug-Free Schools and Communities Act (20
U.S.C. 7101 et seq.), which is part A of title IV of the
Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, is the most
common funding source for prevention activities in schools.
Effective July 1, 2002, the State grants program under the Safe
and Drug-Free Schools and Communities Act authorizes a variety
of activities designed to prevent school violence and youth
drug use, and to help schools and communities create safe,
disciplined, and drug-free environments that support student
academic achievement.
(7) Section 4115(a) of the Safe and Drug-Free Schools and
Communities (20 U.S.C. 7115(a)) requires State and local
prevention programs and activities to meet the ''Principles of
Effectiveness'' criteria described in such section and the
guidelines relating to such criteria developed by the
Department of Education pursuant to such section. The
''Principles of Effectiveness'' provide a framework for
recipients of State and local grant funds to improve the
quality of drug and violence prevention programming implemented
with such funds.
(b) Statement of Policy.--In light of recent studies prepared for
the Department of Education, which indicate that school violence and
prevention programs funded by the Department of Education could be
improved, Congress believes that it would be useful for the Department
of Education to review and revise the guidelines relating to the
''Principles of Effectiveness'' criteria developed pursuant to section
4115(a) of the Safe and Drug-Free Schools and Communities (20 U.S.C.
7115(a)) with the objective of improving safe school programs.

SEC. 3. REVIEW AND REVISION OF GUIDELINES RELATING TO THE ''PRINCIPLES
OF EFFECTIVENESS'' CRITERIA UNDER THE SAFE AND DRUG-FREE
SCHOOLS AND COMMUNITIES ACT.

(a) Review and Revision.--The Secretary of Education shall review
and revise the guidelines relating to the ''Principles of
Effectiveness'' criteria developed pursuant to section 4115(a) of the
Safe and Drug-Free Schools and Communities Act (20 U.S.C. 7115(a)) to
ensure that such guidelines meet the findings of the report prepared
for the Department of Education, entitled ''Wide Scope, Questionable
Quality, Three Reports from the Study on School Violence and
Prevention'' (2002), with particular emphasis on the findings of such
report described in subsection (b).
(b) Findings of Report.--The findings of the report referred to in
subsection (a) are the following:
(1) Relatively higher rates of discipline problems in
middle schools suggest that greater attention to violence
prevention efforts in middle school may be warranted. Attention
to middle school violence problems may also aid in preventing
discipline problems in high school.
(2) Strengthening needs assessments, including collecting
information on the prevalence of problem behavior, would assist
schools and districts in identifying problem areas to allow for
better targeting of violence prevention efforts.
(3) Along with a greater focus on research, schools should
be encouraged to adopt a ''continuous improvement'' process,
whereby quality of implementation, results of activities, and
incidents of problem behavior are tracked to serve as a basis
for modifying activities and developing future plans.
(4) Schools can improve the quality of their violence
prevention activities by strengthening efforts to adopt,
retain, or discard violence prevention programs based on
research evidence on program effectiveness.
(5) Greater emphasis on monitoring the implementation of
violence prevention activities would help ensure that such
activities remain consistent with program models. Collecting
information on the results of activities is critical, to gauge
which activities are proving effective and which need to be
strengthened or discontinued.
(6) Schools and districts should be encouraged to focus on
quality of training of staff that implement and supervise the
violence prevention activities.

SEC. 4. REPORTS.

(a) Initial Report.--Not later than March 1, 2007, the Secretary of
Education shall submit to Congress a report that contains a copy of the
guidelines relating to the ''Principles of Effectiveness'' criteria
developed pursuant to section 4115(a) of the Safe and Drug-Free Schools
and Communities Act (20 U.S.C. 7115(a)) and revised pursuant to section
3 of this Act.
(b) Final Report.--Not later than January 1, 2010, the Secretary of
Education shall submit to Congress a report on the implementation of
the guidelines described in subsection (a), including any change in
program efficacy, types of programs funded, or reduction in school
violence, as a result of such guidelines.
Answer:
School Violence Prevention Act of 2005 - Directs the Secretary of Education to review and revise the guidelines relating to the principles of effectiveness criteria developed under the Safe and Drug-Free Schools and Communities Act to ensure that such guidelines meet the findings of a 2002 report prepared for the Department of Education.