Q: Steve: Here are the deals and offers. The desk is concerned about two things: 1) that we not make the specific of the deals/offers public. They're fine with general statements like "the offers are below the price cap." 2) they have good relationships with the IOUs and the munis and are starting to do a lot of deal; as such, they expressed concern about any comments that might agitate them and make them disinclined to transact with us (sound familiar)? If there's anything else you need, for if you have any questions about this material. Don't hesitate. Good luck. Best,
Propose a subject line
A: Enron Deals for FERC Panel
IN: Thursday night was indeed a blast. I think my cohorts were ruing my existence by the end of the evening because I didn't have to go to work Friday (wedding in Dallas...very fun). I'm sure you managed to have an all right time in SF as well. I am definitely up for a bucket of beer this week. It's supposed to be sunny and warm all week long and I can think of nothing that goes better with that than cold beer. As for Austin, I have a wealth of information on the subject that I would be more than happy to share. Susan

Generate a subject line.

OUT: FYI
IN: This is an email
Dear Enron's topmanagement, We are not only concerned on the crashed stock but also Enron's situation in Japan. The business here is too difficult!!! How do you know the current situation here: > Bad Reputation in Japan - if you say you are from Enron people will say "No" > Ignorance of Japanese Business - wasting many time on TOCOM, a market controlled by mafia, those minor comnies want to cheat Enron's money > Unsatisfactory business environment - deregulation will not proceed in three years > Poor manegment - the office is like a kindergarden, the so called "experts" have serious discrimmination with local staff; They do nothing themselves just ask the local "slave" to work hard and they go to vacation or business trip > "Sato" means sweet in Japanese but Sato Project is not so sweet as you think! Have you expected another "E-power"? I have to say we are so dispointed with Enron!!!! Enron Japan is at the entrance of "Bermuda Triangle", we worry when will it dispear? Sato Enron Japan

What is the subject?

OUT: Enron Japan is at the entrance of "Bermuda Triangle"!!!
QUESTION: Dear Ken, I am forwarding to you a copy of a second letter that you and Dean Powers will be receiving later today from the AFL-CIO and the Amalgamated Bank. This letter will also be released to the press. It addresses the AFL-CIO's and the Bank's concern that board procedures be adopted that would help ensure comprehensive disclosure to shareholders in light of a possible upcoming transaction involving Enron. If you, Dean Powers, or your staffs would like to discuss the ideas in the letter or our thoughts about possible additions to the Enron board please do not hesitate to contact me or my colleague Bill Patterson. Sincerely,
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: Second AFL-CIO Letter to Enron
Angela, It's me, your favorite coworker! Attached is, yet again, an Access file with a table of historicals for clay basin (Questar pipeline). Before they can be loaded, however, a new location needs to be added with DRN: EBBCLAYHIST Please make up an IHS id and the title should read, "Clay Basin Inj and W/D Historicals Only" Thanks.
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: clay historicals
John/Gia: You asked that we attempt to evaluate our activities. Working with TW, I've valued this one. The California Commission ruled that the "Hector Road" natural gas recent point in California ought to be made a primary receipt point. This would have had the effect of TW losing access right to 200 MMcf/d of capacity at SoCalGas' Needles receipt point. Best case scenario: Under SFV rates, loss to TW is commodity rates (wash) and the fuel margin. TW calculates the fuel margin to be $5.8MM/yr. Bad case: If shippers on TW try to make the case that TW is at fault for losing the primary access rights, then TW is at risk for the demand component of the contracts associated with the 200 MMcf/d. TW calculates the demand charges loss to be $16.5 MM/yr. Worse case: In addition to actual damages listed above, shippers face performance penalties and other contractual damages (from their customers) and they try to pass those costs on to TW. I discussions with TW, we concluded that the most likely case fell between "best" and "bad," somewhere in the $12-15MM/yr range. TW believes that without the assistance of CA Gov't Affairs in the case, the $12-15 MM/yr would have been lost. Be happy to discuss with you further. Best,
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer:
Valuation of GA Activities