Q: If Suppose ECP at the margin could be pursued with full knowledge of the effects., can we say that "Assume that the ECP at the margin couldn't be pursued with full knowledge of the effects."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A: no

Premise:
"that's one thing i did notice uh pharmaceuticals electronics that makes up i mean enough to be like eight or ten percent of their business but um i really don't know agriculturally they could have so much and they and they don't they don't seem to uh i don't know if i heard they don't feed themselves or not i don't think they support themselves agriculturally i found that to be really odd"
Hypothesis: Not being able to support yourself agriculturally is very bizarre.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

it is not possible to tell

input question: Landscape raced by the windows, shrouded in darkness. If this premise is true, does that tell us:"The train wizzed by the landscape."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: yes

Question:
Based on the premise "We ought to gee along together very well." Tommy looked at him curiously for a minute, as though he were about to speak, then changed his mind and said nothing.", can we conclude that "Tommy spoke loudly after the man finished telling him that they would be good friends."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
no

Question: Sentence A: Whites who never practiced discrimination are nonetheless beneficiaries of it.

Sentence B: No whites benefit from discrimination.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question: Sentence A: Because you'd kill the goose that lays the golden eggs, replied Tommy quietly.

Sentence B: Tommy explained that it was not wise to kill the goose with the golden eggs.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer:
it is not possible to tell