instruction:
In this task, you're given a statement, and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence clearly disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3' corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.
question:
Statement: An attorney representing a client before judge and jury was no longer the norm of a case when delivering critical legal services to low-income individuals. Choices: 1. Attorneys representing low-income individuals are the norm. 2. The norm of the case was violated when the attorney delivered their services. 3. Low-income individuals are often targeted by the justice system because of their inability to finance their legal battles.
answer:
1

question:
Statement: In contrast with the existing Section 411, which imposes a full financial penalty starting immediately after the deadline for holding allowances covering emissions, Section 406 imposes a financial penalty that is graduated, with the penalty increasing the longer the period before the excess emissions are offset and the financial penalty is paid. Choices: 1. Section 411 and Section 406 are virtually identical. 2. Section 411 and Section 406 were drafted within the same year. 3. Section 411 deals with financial penalties related to allowances covering emissions.
answer:
1

question:
Statement: Hastings, do you not see? Choices: 1. Hastings always has trouble seeing the larger picture. 2. Hasting can always see the larger picture of things. 3. Hastings should be able to see this.
answer:
2