Given a paragraph about movies, and a set of conversational question answers about the paragraph, generate a relevant question to the topic of the paragraph. The paragraph has the prefix 'CONTEXT:'. Each conversation question has a prefix 'Q:' followed by the answer prefix 'A:'.

[Q]: CONTEXT: You can safely watch Season 5 of Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. without worrying about spoiling the end of Infinity War. There are no spoilers made, and only some very vague references to the beginning of Infinity War, and none to the movie's climax. The references are slim and not relevant to the plot of the show, and are a lot less tied into the show than the Winter Soldier reveals to Season 1 (where they were essential to understanding the plot) or even the vague references to Thor 2 earlier in that season, where the agents come to play clean-up after the events of the movie. Go forth and watch safely. <sep> Q: Agents Of S.H.I.E.L.D Season 5 - does it spoil Avengers: Infinity War? A: You can safely watch Season 5 of Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. without worrying about spoiling the end of Infinity War
[A]: Would you recommend I watch it?

[Q]: CONTEXT: As we later discover in the movie, you can alter the laws of nature because the world we are living is not exactly real. So the ones communicating with Neo know how to do this. I think that's what the filmmakers are trying to say here. Someone who does not obey to the physical laws is trying to communicate with Neo. So I guess this was not them being cheap rather than trying to stress this 'supernatural' element of the one behind the messages. <sep> Q: Why wasn't Neo's monitor connected to anything? A: As we later discover in the movie, you can alter the laws of nature because the world we are living is not exactly real
[A]: Is there any symbolism involved here?

[Q]: CONTEXT: I accept and agree with the answer that was given on SFF ("Sansa was smart enough to wait for everyone to say aye, so they can't go back on their word"). However in my opinion there could also be the fact that, the north has always had its own sort of "culture" and independence, there is a certain respect between northern houses. So it's easier for the other kingdoms to accept them as independent, since they've always, culturally, been seen as seperate from the other six kingdoms. On top of this, the north is the size of the other six kingdoms combined, so having them ruled independently makes much more sense, than in the other kingdoms cases. <sep> Q: Why didn't the other kingdoms want to be independent? A: he north is the size of the other six kingdoms combined, so having them ruled independently makes much more sense, than in the other kingdoms cases
[A]:
why didn't the Iron Islands want to be independent?