You will be given a review about a book, an item, a place or a movie. After that, a question is given that you should answer using a certain span of the review. Your answer should be from the review itself and should not contain extra words, and should not be a combination of different spans. If there's no direct answer to the question, answer with a part of the text that is the most relevant to the question. See the examples for clarification.

Ex Input:
review: This is a nice little gift set for you favorite chocolate lover. The ingredients are organic and Fair Trade Certified. The gift box also states it is suitable for vegetarians. The collection consists of twelve miniature chocolate bars that measure approximately 2 1/4 inch by 1 inch. The bars are 1/4 inch thick. You get two of each flavor in each box. The collection consists of Dark 70%, Milk, Toffee, Almond, Ginger and Cherry flavored bars. The Milk, Toffee, and Almond bars are milk chocolate. The Dark 70%, Ginger and Cherry are dark chocolate. My favorite was the ginger bar which boasted a subtle ginger flavor, with bits of crystallized ginger incorporated in the chocolate. The dark chocolate is good without being overly bitter like some dark chocolate can be. The milk chocolate is smooth and creamy in flavor. I enjoyed each flavor.This collection is a bit pricey as most good chocolate is, but I think it would make an excellent gift. The box has a wonderful presentation and the chocolates are delicious as well! It is a gift you can feel good about giving! I know I would be happy to receive a box of these chocolates as a gift!
question: Was the chocolate very bitter?

Ex Output:
This is a nice little gift set for you favorite chocolate lover

Ex Input:
review: I think this book has been unfairly advertised in order to hopefully grab people who enjoyed the Harry Potter books. when I was given this behemoth of a novel to read, I was told I'd like it because "its a mix of Harry Potter and Jane Austen." Its an entirely different kind of novel than Harry Potter; and the only connection to a Jane Austen novel would be that its set in old England and uses old English ("chuses" for example). That said, the writing style is more in line with Jane Austen than some of the modern authors. But, I wouldn't call this book Harry Potter done by Jane Austen. Its also a fairly hard book to get into which is highly different from the pickup and readability of Harry Potter.I don't even want to talk about what the book is about and my recommendation is to not read the book jacket because it basically tells you the entire story. Strange and Norrell tells the story of a magician, Norrell, who wants to bring magic back to England under his own terms. But it doesn't start out like that. It starts out with totally different characters who consider themselves magicians but don't practice. Then it becomes a different novel about Norrell and his personal idealogies...then it involves Strange and tells his whole life history up to this moment before showing his ideologies.Part of the problem with the novel in its early pages is that it has a ton of beginnings. It feels like the story will be about one thing but then introducing someone else gives another beginning to the story. Its filled with too many false starts. It also spends a large portion of the book setting up what will unfold in the last two hundred pages; in fact the majority of the story dictated in the book flap happens in the last half of the novel. Fans of very pickup and read novels will probably be turned off early on. Its a shame because this novel is very rich.It has a lot of subtext involving the time period (1800s) that fans/history buffs of the time period will enjoy. I hate to call it a historical fiction, but it closely resembles this but with a fantastical twist (namely magic). Susanna Clarke spends a good deal of time describing the time period, the setting, the characters, their motivations, etc that you really do get a good feeling for the characters. She does a good job developing characters that will definitely have an idealogical and moral confrontation. Clarke does tend to lean on cliches every now and then, what with the yes-men surrounding Norell and their tireless bickering on who's better. Its handled deftly, but its still cliched at parts.My recommendation is that if you enjoy a quick read (and I don't mean page length) then I would just check this novel out. If you are interested in devoting a good portion of your time to a novel that is thick with description, characterization and a plot that involves a ton of setup and involves a ton of characters that need to be introduced, then this is a good novel for you.
question: How unusual is this book?

Ex Output:
this book has been unfairly advertised

Ex Input:
review: So I jumped on the bandwagon because a lot of my coworkers were reading the book. The story itself is pretty intriguing and suspenseful and you can't help but Cheer Katniss on as you read about her trials through the games. It hooks you in and keeps you there and that above all is what I enjoyed about the book.
question: Is the plot line good enough?

Ex Output:
The story itself is pretty intriguing and suspenseful