In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.
--------
Question: Comment: Actually, those who fought in the military fought to protect the rights of people like those NFL players, and their supporting owners, who made a peaceful demonstration. That is what you fought for: to protect all speech, not just the speech you agree with. You did not fight for the flag or national anthem. You fought for the Constitution. This is what our freedom is about. It's not about marching in lock step with what a fake patriot like DT commands. Our military fought so we can protest dictators like DT.

Answer: Non-sexual-explicit

Question: Comment: "Arson in the second degree
164.315
A person commits the crime of arson in the second degree if:

By knowingly engaging in the manufacture of methamphetamine, the person causes fire or causes an explosion that damages ...Any property of another and the damages to the property exceed $750"

I think we need to add 'hash oil manufacturing' to this Oregon statute. Too many stoned idiots are out there playing chemist.

Answer: Non-sexual-explicit

Question: Comment: Anyone who relies on CBO scoring is a fool.

Answer:
Non-sexual-explicit