Sentence 1: In a 1985 memo, Neuharth threatened to transfer out of the country any editors who sloppily allowed America or Americans into the paper when they meant citizens and residents of the United States.

Sentence 2: The difference in these two terms creates an entirely new meaning in the papers that include them.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question:
yeah he's they're wanting to record a gas chamber

Does it follow that "Everyone wants to record a donkey."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
no

Q: If For animals?, can we say that "Is all the food for the animals?"?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A: it is not possible to tell

Premise:
"The Corp had ten million tiny little versions of me, packaged and ready to sell- all they needed as an excuse to put them on the shelf."
Hypothesis: The Corp had millions of little versions of me all packaged up.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

yes

input question: Like the Hatch Act, however, these laws have never been enforced against the White House. If this premise is true, does that tell us:"The Hatch Act has never been enforced against the White House."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: yes

Q: If For example, one point that is sometimes overlooked is that low personal saving has consequences for U.S. reliance on foreign borrowing, long-term economic growth, and standards of living for future generations., can we say that "That low personal saving has no consequences for U.S"?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A:
no