Question: Sentence A: The portion is tiny, the chicken is in rubbery cubes so uniform they barely look like food, and the noodles are all clumped together on one side.

Sentence B: The food was excellent, five star quality.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question: Personal pronouns anchor the headlines as they drive home an idea James and Dewey would have welcomed--the USA as one big first-person-plural community.
James and Dewey hated the concept of the USA being considered a community.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Problem: Here is a premise:
It is retarded under certain conditions, none of which, however, appear to have been present in this case.

Here is a hypothesis:
Under certain rules and terms applied by the judge (none of which have been present in this case), it is retarded.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Sentence 1: Meeting periodically with senior managers to discuss the security implications of new information technology uses being considered.

Sentence 2: Meeting every now and then with senior managers to converse about security implications for new IT uses.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: yes

Question:
But his office deserves and demands it.

Does it follow that "His office isn't deserving of it and didn't ask for it."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
no

Question:
Based on the premise "now is she does she like um McDonald's French fries oh okay", can we conclude that "She actually doesn't like Mcdonald's french fries."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
no