QUESTION: Premise: "A bicyclist performing a trick over a heavily graffitied wall."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A cyclist is flipped upside down over a wall." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Let's solve it slowly: Performing a trick over a wall doesn't imply being flipped upside down over it.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

[QUESTION] If "A woman tennis player wearing black holds a bunch of tennis balls with her racket." does that mean that "There's a woman holding many tennis balls on her racket."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A woman tennis player holds many tennis balls on her racket.
The answer is yes.

Q: Given the sentence "An indian woman in a green sari is crocheting." can we conclude that "The woman is making something."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A: The woman is indian. Crocheting is the same as making something.
The answer is yes.

QUESTION: Can we conclude from "A group of friends that were playing a stacking game before it came falling down." that "A group of friends were having lunch."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell

Let's solve it slowly: Friends having lunch are not normally focused on playing a stacking game at the same time.
The answer is no.

[QUESTION] Premise: "Three people at a library with computers."
Hypothesis: "People rubbing sticks to start a fire in a pit."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
There cannot be a fire pit in the library with computers.
The answer is no.

Q: Premise: "Two children smile next to a fruit vendor's cart."
Hypothesis: "There are children near the vendors cart."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
A:
The words next to are a different version of the word near.
The answer is yes.