This is the content of an email: I would like to do fewer resolutions authorizing non-vps to sign contracts, and when we need such authorizations, let's make sure the resolutions are appropriately limited. My thoughts are as follows: 1. We have a lot of vps that can sign contracts. 2. It is generally ok to have confirmations signed by certain carefully selected directors since we are confirming a trade that already took place and there is master agreement already signed. 3. There are certain very routine agreements like pipeline right-of-way agreements that are ok for carefully selected directors to sign. 4. Confidentiality agreements should be signed by a vp. 5. Any authorization for a director to sign should expire within not more than one year and revoke all prior authorizations. Please give me your comments. Mark
What was the subject line for this email?
Appointments of Agents and Attorneys in Fact