Q: The attached list are outstanding receivables associated with the Central Region group that have occurred prior to December 2000. I would request that these receivables get written off in order to clean up the books. Total value $11,783.70. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to give me a call.
Propose a subject line
A: Account Receivables
IN: OK, I apologize, I've been trying to lock myself to the computer and crunch some #'s, but can't seem to get control of my schedule. Wanted to lay out the core/noncore model that's been pitched (and that CMA showed keen interest in this morning) to see if we're all on the same page; but perhaps this is the analysis that you're already working on: Split takes place either 1.1.03 or 6.1.03. Core and noncore are responsible for the "DWR past purchases" (spread over 15 years). Core will keep IOU gen, QFs and DWR contracts (which would eliminate the short for the core) Noncore, in return for giving up the lucrative IOU gen, effectively accepts the short position (i.e., goes to market) AND does not get sacked with DWR's going forward costs (with "forward costs" defined as all power costs attributable to the "post-core/noncore" transition date. Let me know if this tracks with where we're headed. Thanks. Best,

Generate a subject line.

OUT: Concept for core/noncore Analysis
IN: This is an email
Richard Sanders has asked me to set up a meeting regarding the above referenced. The following participants are: Lisa Mellencamp Mark Peterson John Hopley John Enerson Richard Sanders It looks as though, this Friday, Aug. 13. at 2:00 will be a good time for everyone. Please let me know if this time is convenient for you. The location will be 38C1. (I tried to contact you by phone today, but your extension 31406 was forwarded to a non working number). My extension is 39402, if you wish to call me. Thanks

What is the subject?

OUT: Noram Rigs
QUESTION: Just got an update on the project that won't go away. Dennis has a meeting lined up with DOE decisionmakers on the 25th. He is going to pitch the project as an approximately 100 mw power plant, to be owned by (read "financed by") DOE, with the gas pipeline owned by Dennis and\or third parties (read "Enron"?). Dennis has run economics that show the DOE will get a more than 10% cost savings on the project compared to current PNM rates, even assuming a fairly high gas transport cost because of the smaller gas load. How did he do it? Very easy: they ran the power plant economics using about a $2.00 gas cost instead of current, real world prices. Dennis' argument is going to be: "I'll take the risk on building the pipeline and the power plant at a capped cost, and then sell the power plant to you." "You take the risk on gas cost: if gas cost tracks the 18-24 month average, you will realize your 10% cost savings, but if current fuel costs continue or escalate, you lose." Either way, your reliability improves and you kick PNM in the shins." Dennis and Tino apparently think they can sell DOE on this. By the way, their current story on Richardson is that he won't resign, and won't be forced out by the administration because that would create even more publicity. You'll love this: they think Richardson is even more likely to sign off on the deal now because his chances of being nominated for VP or cabinet are dead and he now has nothing to lose in DC. They think his real angle is now to bring home the bacon to New Mexico and then run for governor out there!! Apparently the rank and file out in the home state think he got hosed and made a scapegoat unfairly. I've asked Lorna Brennan to pull some historical San Juan prices together to give to Tino to confirm whether his $2 price is wacky. Other than that, I just told Tino that we are potentially interested in the pipeline part of the project if the risks and rewards make sense, and that EE&CC might be interested in the design/build on all of it. He said he'd get back to me after the 25th meeting and tell me whether the project is undead. DF
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: Pueblo
I invite you to provide feedback on the Analyst & Associate Program, using a very short, anonymous and confidential survey. In the very near future, you will receive an email from ramabile@execlead.com asking for feedback on your overall satisfaction with the Program, and your suggestion of one thing we should focus on for improvement. To insure confidentiality of your responses, Executive Leadership has been engaged to conduct and compile the results of the survey. The survey is designed to be completed in about two minutes, and your participation is important. We plan to do short surveys like this a couple of times each year, in addition to the all employee survey. As always, I invite each of you to contact me or anyone on my team if you'd like to discuss ideas or issues in person. Thank you in advance for your participation, Billy Lemmons
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: Analyst & Associate Program - Short Survey
...okay, maybe it's not THAT good but it's cooked and the beer is plentiful. Hey everyone, Just wanted to test the waters and see what kind of interest there was in doing Steak Night tomorrow night at Little Woodrows. I feel like it's been a while since we really rallied the troops and I know I have personally missed the interaction. It's also been a while since we've attempted to solve the worlds problems over cold Shiner and I think the world may be the worse for it. So, get back to me and let me know if anyone's up for an evening of eating, drinking and most definitely being merry. If it looks like 'a go', I'll shoot everyone a follow-up email complete with ETA. The one and only, sscott5 "If we could just get everyone to close their eyes and visualize world peace for an hour, imagine how serene and quiet it would be until the looting started."
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer:
USDA Grade A prime beef....