Instructions: In this task, you will be shown a prompt from a judicial decision and multiple holding statements derived from citations following text in a legal decision. Holdings represent the governing legal rule when the law is applied to a particular set of facts. There are five answer choices for each citing text. The correct answer is the holding statement that corresponds to the citing text. The four incorrect answers are other holding statements. You should find the correct option. There is a <HOLDING> token in the position of the citing text prompt where the holding statement was extracted.
Input: CURIAM. AFFIRMED. See Robinson v. Sun Bank & Trust Co., 685 So.2d 1325 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996) (<HOLDING>). THOMPSON, TORPY and LAWSON, JJ.,
Holding statements: (A) holding that the court did not have jurisdiction to hear an appeal after an untimely filing of a notice of appeal (B) holding that an untimely postjudgment motion does not toll the time for filing a notice of appeal and that this court has no jurisdiction over an untimely filed appeal (C) holding that appeal of order became moot when order was complied with and court of appeals was notified and that court of appeals erred in issuing advisory opinion on merits of appeal (D) holding that the case must be dismissed for lack of appellate jurisdiction where notice of appeal was untimely (E) holding that the appellate court must accept appeals referees finding of untimeliness and affirm unemployment appeals commissions order dismissing claimants appeal as untimely where it appeared that claimant did not appeal decision within twenty days and did not dispute that notice of appeal was untimely
Output:
(E)