Here is an email: You have received this message because someone has attempted to send you an e-mail from outside of Enron with an attachment type that Enron does not allow into our messaging environment. Your e-mail has been quarantined and is being held at the MailSweeper server. Sender: lwbthemarine@alltel.net
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: An Inbound Message For You Has Been Quarantined
Q: The information contained herein is based on sources that we believe to be reliable, but we do not represent that it is accurate or complete. Nothing contained herein should be considered as an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any financial instruments discussed herein. Any opinions expressed herein are solely those of the author. As such, they may differ in material respects from those of, or expressed or published by on behalf of Carr Futures or its officers, directors, employees or affiliates. ? 2001 Carr Futures The charts are now in the most recent version of Adobe Acrobat 4.0 and they should print clearly from Adobe Acrobat Reader 3.0 or higher. Adobe Acrobat Reader 4.0 may be downloaded for FREE from www.adobe.com. (See attached file: UnleadedStocks.pdf)(See attached file: CrudeDeviation(xJun90-Jan91).pdf)(See attached file: HeatingOilStocks.pdf) (See attached file: API.pdf)(See attached file: CrudeStocks.pdf) - UnleadedStocks.pdf - CrudeDeviation(xJun90-Jan91).pdf - HeatingOilStocks.pdf - API.pdf - CrudeStocks.pdf
Propose a subject line
A: API 12/4
IN: Please pass this onto the individuals in your groups: Tomorrow's simulation and Friday's desk to desk trading will provide an excellent opportunity for us to double check the online deals in tagg and sitara. Please pay special attention to these deals and let me know of any bridging issues. Even though we have been testing and having various people check the deals in the underlying systems, I am afraid of any logic that may be hardcoded in the bridge. Notify me immediately of any deals that are bridging incorrectly and I will try to resolve as soon as possible. I will also be watching the bridge to research any failed deals. Thanks for your help. Let's hope for a smooth transition! Dawn 3-9353

Generate a subject line.

OUT: Bridge logic
IN: This is an email
Dear Ken: This note builds on the earlier voice mail, and a memorandum I have sent to you, following the Dave Dorman meeting. Given the initial ground work done by our team at ATT leadership level, the meeting between Jeff and David Dorman, we think did go as expected by us. I am sure Dave and Stewart, along with Jeff have shared their views of the meeting, and do feel positive about the process forward. Our take on the meeting is as follows: 1. Dave Dorman is open and eager to explore ways ATT and Enron could cooperate across the board. 2. Dave wants to move fast, but at a pace that will work within ATT, and is strategically sound for both the organizations 3. He is now looking forward to specific value propositions from Enron-Adventis team, which he is prepared to discuss with us. 4. On that basis I am sure he will guide us to the most appropriate guys within ATT who will need to understand and act on the value propositions. In view of the above the real work begins now. As discussed with Dave and Stewart, we will further reinforce our commitment to develop, and take the basic proposals with ATT forward. Our team is already on the job and will meet with Stewart early this week. I did indicate to both Dave and Stewart that we will like to take the next steps in a most expeditious and matured fashion so that all the strategic possibilities to create the new bandwidth dynamics between the two companies could be achieved. Given that there were some hesitation within Enron on the out come of the first meeting with ATT, we committed to the last 2.5 weeks of work with a reduced fee structure. Now that the first major step has been successfully taken, we plan to work with you along our normal professional fee schedule. As we do want to move as fast as possible and if at any point indications are that the desired out come will be difficult to achieve we could stop and review progress. As a result, although not common, we are willing to work with a weekly rate, adjusted to professional fees of $75,000/week and out of pocket expenses. In addition of course for an engagement of this nature which essentially leverages our firms professional credibility and trust in the industry, our clients pay us on the basis of successful execution of the alliance formation along preset milestones. Given the strategic nature of this engagement, and our commitment to assist you with all the major Telcos, -- incumbents and new, we will welcome to

What is the subject?

OUT: Moving forward: URGENT, URGENT.
QUESTION: California: A01-10-011 PG&E Gas Accord. On Monday Jan. 7th Greg Klatt will enter an appearance on behalf of Transwestern at PG&E's Gas Accord Prehearing Conference. This will maintain our position to participate in the proceeding as needed. I99-07-003 SoCal Unbundling. SoCal filed its Advice Letter No. 3015 to implement the CPUC's Dec. 11th decision to unbundle the SoCalGas Transmission and Storage Systems however the filing only addresses Ordering Paragraph Nos. 9-15 of the decision. This section of the order directs SoCal to outline within their tariff the Comprehensive Settlement Agreement arrangements for allocating stranded costs. It does not address capacity or open season issues as dictated by the order. We will investigate the filing with SoCal as to the status of addressing these issues. A01-10-024 SoCalGas BCAP. In regard to filing comments on EGA's motion to strike the testimony and related materials on embedded cost-based allocation versus the long-run marginal cost methodology for the hearing on Monday, Jan. 7, 2002, it was decided not to file comments, but continue monitoring the proceeding. By participating Transwestern will continue to have the option of addressing any of the issues raised by other parties. CPUC Infrastructure Report. The Commission has issued its report and assessment of the state's gas infrastructure for the three major utilities in California. Their conclusion is that the natural gas transportation and storage systems are adequate to provide reliable amounts of competitively priced gas to residential, commercial, industrial and electric generation customers. Therefore they recommend that the Power Authority should not finance any new natural gas projects. Schedule: Week of Jan. 7 - Omaha
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: Weekly Report of 1/4/02
IN: John: The Duke issue has arisen once again in connection with the settlements group. Did you ever resolve the issue? Apparently, two (2) identical trades were executed online on 9/11/00, one at 1:14 pm and the second at 1:28 pm. Duke agrees wtih the first trade but not the second. Please bring me up to date. Thanks. Sara

Generate a subject line.

OUT:
EOL Duke Deal - commercial resolution FOLLOWUP