instruction:
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
question:
What does the rest of the Trump cheerleading squad have to say about this?

http://www.adn.com/politics/article/donald-trump-campaign-unveils-alaska-supporters-including-treadwell-mcguire/2016/05/16/
answer:
Yes

question:
Anecdotal evidence is not a strong argument. That a few people do well without degrees does not change the fact that the vast majority of dropouts face dismal employment prospects. And besides, nobody is saying the students are stupid. The article and most comments are saying the schools in combination, probably, with many of the parents, and society, are failing the students, because Oregon ranks near the bottom at high school graduation rates and college preparedness. Presumably, the states and nations that are doing better are doing better not because of any genetic difference in their young people, but because of a different set of academic values and standards.
answer:
Yes

question:
Once again, the Mayor misses the boat. The now-doomed SW-SAZ plan was cooked up by outsiders ("anybody" was indeed leading the pack) and the residents of the zone were only informed later about what was going to be good for them.

Any plan to upzone (upscale) or change an established neighborhood requires a lot more than a meeting for all and then facilitation by Oregon Consensus. Mediation or facilitation implies that the slate already exists and we're now going to tweak it.

Residents of south Eugene have said no to that process repeatedly (see http://www.swneugene.org). What they have agreed on is plain and simple: a R - E - F - I - N - E - M - E - N - T plan as the platform upon which any future changes can be made. And this plan must be community driven; no more top-down directives.
answer:
No