Q: Hope your long weekend was a good one, uneventful on Monday, at least. Got your message last Friday. It seems as if Kristin is more and more interested in the EBS role, especially after her continuing discussions with Jim Fallon. The timing of her trip to London is somewhat up in the air. May be the end of this week, may be next week. I think it will still be good for you and Kristin to talk in person. Kristin and Todd are both very qualified and you would love working with both. Kristin's established working relationship with Jim Fallon would definitely be a plus. I don't want to lose both of them from ENA, however, at the same time. So I would suggest that we make it an either or propostion. I got your message on housing/location in Houston. I am headed out of the office soon for an offsite meeting hosted by ENA's Office of the Chairman. I will call you on Friday when I am back in the office and talk through some options on housing.
Propose a subject line
A: Update
IN: The test that we are scheduling for tomorrow Tuesday May 22, 2001 is against Sybase Stage. This test is intended to give us a reference for performance metrics comparisons between the current Sybase system and the new MS SQL system. If you have more questions feel free to ask. Georgia Ward ENW - Development Support - QA (713)853-9974

Generate a subject line.

OUT: Performance Testing Clarification
IN: This is an email
Veronica, Attached is the Guaranty Amendment for Nicor Energy, L.L.C., which adds financial transactions to the existing guaranty. Please copy Jim Hunt at Nicor (jhunt@nicor.com) on you message. Once received from Nicor, the Amendment needs to be countersigned by ENA. We will also need a copy for our files when fully executed. Please call me if you have any questions. Stephanie

What is the subject?

OUT: Nicor Guaranty Amendment
QUESTION: Scott - Please zero out the demand charges for Virginia Natural Gas November 2001 production on the following deals: 602027 602028 602021 602018 602019 602020 I also need the deal 1020386 price for November 2001 to be changed to zero. The volumes need to stay the way they are but this is a pass through charge to the customer and they have paid this amount to Transco. Please call me if you have any questions and please let me know when this is done so I can process it in the back office. Thanks for your assistance.
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: Demand reimbursement charges for VNG Nov prod.
Jeff, Like everyone else in the world, I was really surprised by your annoucement. I hope the personal issues that caused you to take this step fall into the category of "manageable" with more time and attention. Just wanted you to know that I am thinking about you. Best wishes, Les +-------------------------------------------------------------+
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: Thinking about you
Tana: As we discussed, here is my list of amendments that are according to my records in various stages of negotiation: 1. Allegheny energy - Patricia Clark sent to Frank Davis her comments on June 15th by e-mail. I responded on June 19th and have never heard back from her. Most of her comments we could not accept. None of her comments have been run by Dave. 2. Imperial Oil - Grant Oh was handling this. They had 3 comments. most of which we could not accept. I spoke with Grant about this around June 6th and have never heard back from him. None of their proposed changes have been run by Dave. 3. Kennecott Coal Sales Company - A draft amendment letter which Dave F. has approved was sent to them on May 15th. My contact there is Jim Sobule Wayne Gresham is alos involved in this. I have never heard back from Jim. 4. Arco - We received by e-mail comments from David Dyck at Arco in March. Tori Kuykendall and Grant Oh are involved from the Enron side. I responded to David Dyck by e-mail on March 10th and have never heard anything further on this. None of their comments or my response has been reviewed by Dave. 5. Chevron - Canada - I received a letter from Bruce Borwick on January 31st which I responded to and have never heard anything further from them. Dave has not reviewed their comments or my response. 6. Cargill - I sent to Mike Pederson a form of amendment letter which I don't think has been signed. They wanted a minor change to the confidentiality language. Dave has not seen this but in the event that Cargill comes back to life, i doubt that he will have a problem with it. 7. Cinergy - I sent a draft amendment letter which dave approved to John Dirheimer on May 15th. To my knowledge it has not been signed. 8. Duke Energy - I sent a draft amendment letter to John Puett on May 15th which Dave approved. To my knowledge, it has not been signed. 9. Talisman - we have been exchanging drafts of a revised ETA for months. My contact there is Ann Love. We are close to reaching agreement with them and mark has been involved in some of the early discussions. I am sending to Dave a mark-up of the revised agreement for his approval. All of the ETA amendment letters and the Talisman revised ETA are in my directory under specproj/online. Carol
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer:
Status of Online Amendments