IN: Raj, I spoke with Zhiyong and they are going to run the script overnight and give a status in the morning. Kam has sent Zhiyong a tentative list and is confirming with RAC that she has all the right post id's. I have asked Zhiyong to run with the tentative list. US Global Products and Coal Post ID's have been sent to Zhiyong. We will send the London Global products post id's first thing in the morning. EIM book data has been extracted via a fetch macro and we have begun creating the schedule A for those books and hope to have it for cob tomorrow. Sheila Glover and Clara Carrrington are working on the fx/interest rate books and Sheila will provide an update on progress cob tomorrow. Kam, Zhiyong, Todd and Sheila, If any of the above is incorrect, please feel free to correct. Kevin

Generate a subject line.

OUT: Update on Schedule A for Ernst and Young

IN: Richard, it is my understanding that this investment is currently in Ray Bowen's business. In my ENA shoes, I would say we would have no interest in taking on that responsibility. In my EES shoes, I would like to take a closer look at the possible connections. Please send me some info on the investment fund and their current investments portfolio. I have also heard that Tom White has been talking to you about EES taking on the Catalytica investment. With my EES shoes on, no way!!!! Regards

Generate a subject line.

OUT: Heartland Industrial Partners

IN: Starting tomorrow, 11/28/01 we will be included with the Gas Breakfast and Lunches. However, there will be a cost of $5.00 each or $10.00 total when breakfast is provided. They will have lunch everyday and breakfast only three days of the month, which will be during bid week. I will come around every morning and collect your money...I will then have to provide a list to the Gas people who will be checking your name off as you enter the breakfast/lunch line. Please let me know if you have any questions. REMEMBER...ONLY THOSE WHO GIVE THE $5.00 WILL BE EATING. Thanks for your cooperation,

Generate a subject line.

OUT: Breakfast & Lunch - $5.00 ea

IN: The east and west power desks are creating slightly different floating price language for some of the power pools. The west desk wants "negative prices" to be averaged in as "zeroes"; the east desk wants to average in all prices "positive or negative". I'm inclined to let the traders do as they wish. I can't seem to get an explanation for the difference in approach (in each instance ENA may take either side of the deal). The confirm desk will have to pay attention to the source of the confirms to use the correct pricing language. I don't know if this will create an on-line trading issue. What do you think? Sara

Generate a subject line.

OUT:
Financial Power - "Negative Pricing"