Problem: BC<br>Our two year old granddaughter came to Boston last weekend. Her mother and father went to visit Boston College. They went to school there in 2003-2007. They bought her a BC t-shirt. She looked cute in it.

Based on the paragraph above can we conclude that "the mother never went to college"? OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No

A: No
Q: The president promised to fund No Child Left Behind
Now right here in Arizona, that difference would have been $131 million to the state of Arizona to help its kids be able to have better education and to lift the property tax burden from its citizens. The president reneged on his promise to fund No Child Left Behind.
OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No
A: Yes
In late 2006, Aneta Krawczyk accused the party's leader Andrzej Lepper of having offered her political favours for sex in 2001, and then said he had been the father of her youngest child. She said the same of Lepper's close collaborator and MP, Stanislaw Lyzwinski, and accused him of rape and sexual abuse. She also said that Popecki, who had been Lyzwinski's aide, had tried to induce a miscarriage by giving her a labour-inducing drug called oxytocin.
Aneta Krawczyk had more than one child. OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No
A: Yes
input hypothesis: the judgment of Congress doesn't matter
Context: Well, the issue before this Court, I hasten to say, as I said before, is only whether, once the Congress makes that judgment, it can ever change it retrospectively. The issue before this Court is not whether, in the future, a certain length of time would be appropriate.
OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No
true or false: No
Context:
Store Kannikestrde is a street in the Old Town of Copenhagen, Denmark, connecting Frue Plads to Kbmagergade. Its history is closely associated with the University of Copenhagen and some of Copenhagen's oldest halls of residence are located in the street. It has been pedestrianized since 1973.
Hypothesis: Nobody has ever been to Store Kannikestrde. OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No
No
Problem: In fact, we put together a $5. 6 trillion surplus in the '90s that was for the purpose of saving Social Security. If you take the tax cut that the president of the United States has given -- President Bush gave to Americans in the top 1 percent of America -- just that tax cut that went to the top 1 percent of America would have saved Social Security until the year 2075.

Based on the paragraph above can we conclude that "bush tax cuts cost future generations greatly"? OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No

A:
It's impossible to say