In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Q: Comment: "It does seem a little hypocritical for Dogwood to be complaining about Kinder Morgan playing a role in the B.C. election through its donations to the BC Liberals, when it is receiving money from the United States to fight for causes aligned with interests there. "
In one case, foreign interests donate money to advocacy groups.
In the other, foreign interests donate money to a political party whose members currently form the provincial government.
Not even remotely equivalent, Gary, and tf. hardly hypocritical of Dogwood to complain about it.

A: Non-obscene
****
Q: Comment: Just love all you armchair quarterbacks with your tough guy stance! Not standing up for any of these punks as they deserve anything they get including the death penalty. But sure am tired of all you Clint Eastwood wanna be's too! How about we address the social issues instead of acting out your dreams of masculinity!

A: Non-obscene
****
Q: Comment: Meanwhile Taxed is now complaining his Hyundai Santa Fe is a piece of crap!

A:
Obscene
****