QUESTION: Mr. Skilling: Cordell W. Hull, Chairman and CEO of InfrastructureWorld, and a Director of Bechtel Group, Inc., will be in Houston on Wednesdayand Thursday, 1& 2 Augustrespectively, and would like to meet with you, at your convenience, during that period if your calendar allows. Thank you for your consideration and I will contact your office tomorrow to see if this works with your schedule. With best regards,
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: Request for a meeting with Cordell Hull
Tom, I have energy estimates for May 2002 attached. Graph 1 is site totals, graph 2 is (total lost)/(total actual production) where total actual production is taken from the kWh reported in the owner report, and graph 3 is the by turbine distribution (using box plots) of energy lost. The energy lost estimation method I employed is susceptible to problems with data recovery (10-minute data), which in May 2002 was especially poor at Klondike and Fenner, so those number are not as informative as those for the other sites. If these graphs provide you the information you need, I will continue with the remaining months (Jan - Apr). Otherwise let me know and we'll refine this process to get you what you need. Mark
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: WR613 Pitch System Performance (Energy)
Bill, Jr. - I'm so sorry! I should know better by now. Bill, III - You might be more interested in this e-mail than your dad. Kate
Answer: EES - April Deal Discrepancies
Here is an email: Dave The PPA schedule was pushed back two weeks. I would like to keep our meeting with Skilling because I heard he was going to Africa for 3 weeks. Lavo
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: Notification of Postponement
Q: Attached below are the two files for TW CMS/TMS requirements on flow direction and current process for inside/outside the path requirements. Please review these documents and let me know if you have any questions or corrections to apply to either document by COB 8/31/01. Linda, please keep me in the loop on both of the projects since they interface directly with TMS. Thanks Ramona
Propose a subject line
A: TW requirements for Inside/Outside the Path and TW Flow Direction
Here is an email: Question for the team: If it appears that we may have land which may not be able to stay off balance sheet, is it preferable to have the land held by a different LLC than the project LLC, with a lease to the E-Next/OBS compliant project co? If that is the case, what about the possibility of burdening the land with some low dollar hard costs? I don't have anything in particular in mind, it is more of a theoretical question. Thanks,
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A:
LLC structure for power development