Sentence 1: John D. Rockefeller Jr. provided th e money to build this wonderful Art Deco/Neo-Byzantine edifice in 1927.

Sentence 2: John D. Rockefeller Jr. was an admirer of the Art Deco style.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question:
because what happened is like they have this hologram right where you walk in and you can program and everything looks real and you can touch everything and stuff but it's only a program and it's really great because sometimes it's like

Does it follow that "They have a program with a hologram where everything seems to be real, you can even touch it, but it's only a program"?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
yes

Q: If To appraise senior executive contributions to organizational results, BLM, FHWA, IRS, and VBA identified core competencies and supporting behaviors for senior executives to follow, while VBA also identified targets for senior executives to meet that are directly linked to organizational results, as shown in table 1., can we say that "VBA didn't identify targets for senior executives to meet."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A: no

Premise:
"Very much to her credit, she hasn't become bitter about her shrinking influence; she's not stuck in whiny nostalgia for the way things were."
Hypothesis: Kudos to her, because she hasn't turned into a nostalgic person despite the events.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

yes

input question: Restful days seemed to be behind him, behind them all. If this premise is true, does that tell us:"Their restful days were behind them."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: yes

Q: If yeah yeah and so i would think that either the doctor could get him off with that or or that they should listen i mean because i i just can't see that they would do some make somebody go to a rehab or whatever they go through because he took his wife's medicine that just doesn't sound right does it so it seems like they should be able to bend the rules oops excuse me a little bit on that but you but i don't know because i don't know anybody that's had to go through treatment or anything so i really don't know, can we say that "He shouldn't have to get penalized for taking his wife's medicine."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A:
yes