TASK DEFINITION: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the no-need strategy, otherwise output No. no-need is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used when a participant points out that they do not need an item based on personal context such as suggesting that they have ample water to spare. no-need can directly benefit the opponent since it implies that the item is up for grabs.
PROBLEM: Context: 'i would prefer water instead of food if possible, but i am sure we can work it out.' 'water is really important for me, how about i get two waters and three firewoods and you get three foods and one water?' 'i can work with 1 water 3 food and 1 firewood'
Utterance: 'ok that works for me'

SOLUTION: No

PROBLEM: Context: 'Thats a shame, i am sure you would like it if you give it a try, especially if you build a large fire 🙂' 'I was going to say, the fire would be probably one of the few things I would be interested in! I love being warm.' 'Well you can take all the firewood if it will help, would it be ok if i get all the food in return?'
Utterance: 'That works for me. How would you like to divide the water?'

SOLUTION: No

PROBLEM: Context: 'Nice, so are we!' 'That is awesome! The one bad thing about my campsite is there's no stream or lake nearby. I'm going to need a lot of it so I can shower/wash up' 'Well I was hoping to grab some extra water as well, Its suppose to be record highs. '
Utterance: 'I'm sure we can figure something out. I'm going to need a good amount of firewood too to cook my food. The good news is I won't need any food 🙂'

SOLUTION:
Yes