instruction:
In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.
question:
Comment: Quote: "Michelle Obama is taking some heat for recent remarks she made on gender, but I'm struggling to muster outrage given the sheer incoherence of what she actually said."

True, I've rarely found what Michelle says coherent, but I suspect that what she's saying is primarily directed at black communities. She could have gone much further and bluntly stated that blacks coddle far too much the criminality and paternal irresponsibility in black males. (I won't call them men.) That's glaringly obvious and different from mostly white schools where ordinary boyishness is attacked as "toxic masculinity."
answer:
Identity-attack

question:
Comment: The ideology of Islam is in direct conflict with the constitution on many counts. It is unconstitutional to let muslims into the US.
answer:
Identity-attack

question:
Comment: Wrong, and you know it.
Negligence needs to be shown. Intent is not necessary, for a felony crime to have been committed.
Now, are you going to try to claim that she wasn't negligent?
What mistake was she referring to then, pal?
answer:
Non-identity-attack