Categorize the comment on the basis of toxicity. If the comment is toxic (harmful, malicious, derogatory, threat, insult, identity attck, etc.) output Yes, otherwise output No.

Q: No, it shows you the severe problem. The media is trying very hard to push this, and the numbers just are not there like they wish them to be. Lived 50 years of my life without seeing a MAN in my bathroom, UNTIL this year. One crashed in my ladies room, acting like a jackass, yelling loudly at some poor kid "IT" dragged in the bathroom with him. They want us to believe they have been using the womens bathrooms this entire time. I call BS. This is Obamas social experiment for his transgender lover Michael DeVaughn Robinson "AKA Michelle Obama"....its what its ALLLLLLL about....google it...no woman I know has a friggin adams apple!

A: Yes
****
Q: Don't let the oil/gas bastards snow you. They sucked off of the public purse for years and it is time for the bastards to give back

A: Yes
****
Q: It's difficult to have a 'war' if one side is totally unarmed as a result of their own personal choice.

The anti-gun nuts are not those with the 310 million civilian firearms in their possession. It's more like the bleating of sheep where the wolves are in the majority.

Fortunately, the wolves are not feeling threatened. Yet.

A:
No
****