Categorize the comment on the basis of severe toxicity. If the comment is severely toxic output Yes, otherwise output No.

[Q]: the color of the sala flowers reveals the truth that the prosperous must decline
[A]: No

[Q]: Lots of comments but no facts to refute that their was a family incident that required Mr. Stewart going to court. Did the event happen, sounds like it did, did it frighten the two young women, apparently it did so Mr. Stewart there is enough evidence available in the court of public opinion that kind of parenting doesn't allow you to bully your child under any circumstances and it doesn't help you in trying to win an elect to anything.
[A]: No

[Q]: Motley, I wasn't defending the current system, I was merely explaining how it works. Anyone can apply for a license to start a liquor store and I'm sure the state would happily accept if all criteria were met and there were enough potential to support one. One thing our state does very well is find ways to extort more and more money out of us under the guise of helping schools, public services and whatever else the can conjure.
As much as I hate the state having sole control over liquor sales, the ballot measure proposed will be far worse in terms of selection and pricing.
I don't believe the state will accept losing hundreds of millions of dollars in revenue which means they are either going to over tax liquor, as our friends in Washington have experienced, or they will find a way to spread it out by increasing taxes across the board.
[A]:
No