Question:
(One of the many comic-opera touches in the late unlamented Dole campaign was the constant struggle between Jack Kemp, who tried incessantly to give Wanniski a key role, and the sensible economists who tried to keep him out.)

Does it follow that "Most of the sensible economists were in agreement with Kemp that Wanniski should have a key role."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
no

Q: If The exit from the Harem opens into the Third Court, otherwise reached through the Gate of the White Eunuchs., can we say that "The Gate of the White Eunuchs does not lead to the Third Court."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A: no

Premise:
"Don't ask me to explain it; it was long ago, and all I know for sure is that it happened."
Hypothesis: Please don't ask me to explain; it's all in the past, I know for certain what happened
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

yes

input question: It is familiar to battle and strong enough to survive when its wielder does not. If this premise is true, does that tell us:"It knows battle, and can force survival when its wielder is weakened."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: yes

Question:
Based on the premise "here's a nice uh twenty dollar gold eagle uh just just manufactured in Lebanon last year", can we conclude that "Look, this is a $40 gold lion manufactured in Turkey this year."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
no

input question: It also, to be fair, means that Eastwood can go where the Sylvester Stallones and Arnold Schwarzeneggers and Steven Seagals daren't. If this premise is true, does that tell us:"Eastwood is a better actor than Stallone and Seagal."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer:
yes