In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Example Input: Comment: Here's another one worth searching for: G&M Feb 09, 2017
Gerry Sklavounos returning to Quebec Legislature, says he'll be 'more careful'

In light of the G&M "unfounded", The timing of this story is even more poignant--but, I speak as a male. I am sure that many women wouldn't find it poignant at all...but frustrating, infuriating, insulting...
Example Output: Non-obscene

Example Input: Comment: The authors of the JJ report insist that homosexuality played no role in the abuse crisis, but their own data undermine this conclusion. For example, they plainly admit that "81% of the victims [between 1950 and 2002] were male," and that 78% were post-pubescent.

So if the abusers weren't pedophiles, and the victims were mostly adolescent males, wouldn't that make the victimizers homosexuals?

What else could we possibly be talking about if not homosexuality?

Why can't you answer this question?
Example Output: Non-obscene

Example Input: Comment: It's a God made, natural plant, that makes people feel happy. How can anyone prohibit a happiness inducing plant?? Anyone that locks someone in a fucking cage for growing or smoking a flower is a fucking criminal!
Example Output:
Obscene