Premise: The most malignly error-ridden study of the American people to appear since the Politburo went out of business (Robert Sam Anson, the London Times ). Even Newt Gingrich, who raves about the book in the Weekly Standard , says Johnson's account of events since the 1960s is too polemical.

Hypothesis: Newt Gingrich enjoys the books even though it's far from the truth.
Answer: it is not possible to tell

Premise: I know, but, still, who else is there?

Hypothesis: There probably isn't anyone else.
Answer: it is not possible to tell

Premise: my age if there was a bunch of college kids coming over for a dinner party no i they would shell their own you know we'd just have crawfish and beer or something but um if it was more formal like if i was you know working environment then i would probably um shell

Hypothesis: Crawfish and beer are terrible together.
Answer: no

Premise: In its submission, EPA did not identify any other statute or executive order imposing procedural requirements relevant to the final rule.

Hypothesis: The EPA failed to show any relevant documentation in regard to the final rule.
Answer: yes