Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.

Input: Consider Input: Take away their dayem cell phones while working for starters. Idiots. Start garnishing wages if they're that oblivious; that'll get their attention.

Output: Yes

Input: Consider Input: And Art Chance, the issuing of pink slips is actually what the governor and the liberals want. Suppose the legislature approves a budget and the governor vetoes the entire bill. He will accuse the legislator of shutting down the govt, just like last year. Can the majority see beyond their noses? Suggest the majority come up with a solution on O&G tax credits by upping the minority by $10 million more in cuts. Then vote and let the chips fall where the may. Then cut the budget to get the UGF to no more than $4.5 billion. Let the governor veto that and hold him accountable for issuing pink slips.

Output: No

Input: Consider Input: Clayton you have seen how ideas of restructuring is to caucus. They get all revenue except the small amount for PFD. They have squandered billions over last ten years. They do not want restructure they want it all to pay for their idea of government. If they cannot budget the past multi-billions what makes you think anything will change when top six block any changes to status quo. No confidence vote on Republican majority. Seems every GOP legislator got marching orders from Sullivan's boss. Take everything and let voters eat cake. How did that work out for Frances ruling idiots. Ignore the angry frustrated mass at own peril. Sooner or later it will come back to bite your head off.
Output: Yes