Question: Sentence A: and then seems like every time she turned around he was outgrowing stuff and she finally learned that you just can not do this you know

Sentence B: He was getting more immature every time she saw him.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question: It would shock no one and disappoint few to find out that Clinton and Lewinsky did have an affair despite his earlier claims.
There are people who would be elated to find out about Clinton and Lewinsky's affair.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Problem: Here is a premise:
holding that a public defender does not act under color of state law because he works under canons of professional responsibility that mandate his exercise of independent judgment on behalf of the client and because there is an assumption that counsel will be free of state control.

Here is a hypothesis:
There is an assumption that counsel does not abide by state laws.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Sentence 1: I dare say it's some natural law that we haven't found out.

Sentence 2: The new natural law is why things keep failing.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question:
As I stated earlier, it could take 5 to 10 years to fully implement this reorganization in an effective and sustainable manner.

Does it follow that "It will only take 2 years to effectively implement."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
no

Question:
Based on the premise "The collection includes works by Manet, Degas, and other French impressionists as well as their Irish counterparts.", can we conclude that "French and Irish impressionists are included in the collection."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
yes