In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Ex Input:
Comment: The Monty Python song is at most an exaggeration. That's probably why it's so funny.

No one is "proud" of masturbation. However, most people realize that it's not a big deal. Saying that it's sinful is at best silly, and at worst shows an unhealthy attitude about sexual activity.

Ex Output:
Sexual-explicit

Ex Input:
Comment: Did the person who gave you the tip demand to be called "deepthroat"?

Ex Output:
Sexual-explicit

Ex Input:
Comment: I don't know if the bishops ever told priests that if they rape a child and celebrate Mass they are committing sacrilege. But even if they didn't, the priest should know that...it is pretty basic Catholicism that receiving Communion with a mortal sin on your soul is sacrilege.

By the logic of your second paragraph, there can never be a mortally sinful sexual act, since sex acts by definition occur in a state of passion. Which begs the question, why in this case would the Scriptures go through the trouble of condemning sexual immorality? This sounds like something your example of a rapist priest could say to himself to justify himself taking Communion in a state of mortal sin.

Ex Output:
Sexual-explicit