input: (CNN) -- Centuries from Gautam Gambhir and Virat Kohli helped India defeat Sri Lanka by seven wickets in the fourth one-day international in Kolkata to take an unassailable 3-1 lead in the five-match series.

Upul Tharanga had hit a superb 118 and Kumar Sangakkara made a fine 60 as the visitors reached an imposing 315 for six after choosing to bat first.

However, Gambhir struck an undefeated 150 and Kohli made 107 -- his maiden century -- the two adding 224 for the third wicket as India easily overhauled the target, the highest one-day run chase at the famous Eden Gardens ground.

After the tourists opted to bat, India began well with the ball, conceding a measly nine from five immaculate overs sent down by new-ball bowlers Zaheer Khan and Ashish Nehra.

But Tillakaratne Dilshan broke the shackles by driving Nehra through the covers in the sixth over for the first boundary and from then on India gradually lost control.

Nehra, who had dropped Tharanga on seven when he failed to hold on to a fairly straightforward return catch, went some way to atoning for that error by snaring Dilshan early and Sanath Jayasuriya, batting at three, also departed cheaply.

But then Sangakkara, who was handed a reprieve before he was even off the mark when Harbhajan Singh squandered a simple chance at third man, and Tharanga built a solid base.

Tharanga, who increased the tempo by hitting Ishant Sharma for five boundaries in the paceman's first over, continued to bat steadily alongside his captain. 1. What did Gautam Gambhir and Virat Kohli help?
2. where?
3. against who?
4. What was the score?
5. how many matches?
6. What did Tharanga do?
7. What did he hit?
8. was that good?
9. Who was undefeated?
10. What did he strike? Return numbered answers in your output.

output: 1. in the match
2. Kolkata
3. Sri Lanka
4. 3 to 1
5. five
6. Kept on batting
7. 118
8. yes
9. Gambhir
10. 150

input: CHAPTER XXXV.

Were uneasiness of conscience measured by extent of crime, human history had been different, and one should look to see the contrivers of greedy wars and the mighty marauders of the money-market in one troop of self-lacerating penitents with the meaner robber and cut-purse and the murderer that doth his butchery in small with his own hand. No doubt wickedness hath its rewards to distribute; but who so wins in this devil's game must needs be baser, more cruel, more brutal than the order of this planet will allow for the multitude born of woman, the most of these carrying a form of conscience--a fear which is the shadow of justice, a pity which is the shadow of love--that hindereth from the prize of serene wickedness, itself difficult of maintenance in our composite flesh.

On the twenty-ninth of December Deronda knew that the Grandcourts had arrived at the Abbey, but he had had no glimpse of them before he went to dress for dinner. There had been a splendid fall of snow, allowing the party of children the rare pleasures of snow-balling and snow-building, and in the Christmas holidays the Mallinger girls were content with no amusement unless it were joined in and managed by "cousin," as they had always called Deronda. After that outdoor exertion he had been playing billiards, and thus the hours had passed without his dwelling at all on the prospect of meeting Gwendolen at dinner. Nevertheless that prospect was interesting to him; and when, a little tired and heated with working at amusement, he went to his room before the half-hour bell had rung, he began to think of it with some speculation on the sort of influence her marriage with Grandcourt would have on her, and on the probability that there would be some discernible shades of change in her manner since he saw her at Diplow, just as there had been since his first vision of her at Leubronn. 1. What is measured by degree of criminality?
2. Who arrived in December?
3. Who knew this?
4. Did he see them before his meal?
5. What did he do before eating?
6. How was the weather?
7. What were the kids gonna do?
8. Which kids wanted to play with "cousin?"
9. Who was "cousin?"
10. What was he doing?
11. Who did he plan to meet later?
12. Where did he go before something rang?
13. Who was she engaged to?
14. Where had he seen Gwen?
15. And where else had he seen her? Return numbered answers in your output.

output: 1. unknown
2. the Grandcourts
3. Deronda
4. no
5. went to dress
6. it was snowing
7. snow-balling and snow-building
8. Mallinger girls
9. Deronda
10. playing billiards
11. Gwendolen
12. to his room
13. Grandcourt
14. at dinner
15. Leubronn

input: (CNN) -- The Supreme Court has just agreed to take on the case of Fisher v. University of Texas. Abigail Fisher, a white woman, argues that she has been a victim of the university's race-conscious admission policies; the university contends that its drive for racial and ethnic diversity is educationally enriching -- a benefit to all students.

Will the ugly discourse that generally characterizes debate over racially preferential policies disappear with the wave of a magic Supreme Court wand? It seems unlikely. The issue is a cat with many more than nine lives. It arrived in the early 1970s and, despite many attacks, some of which have taken the form of amendments to state constitutions, it has survived in pretty fine fettle.

The court will have only eight justices to hear the arguments. Elena Kagan, having been involved in the case as solicitor general in the Obama administration, has bowed out of participation. Her absence, however, leaves five justices likely to express at least some degree of skepticism about the racial preferences given to non-Asian minorities in the admissions process.

Has the University of Texas been enriched by academic diversity? Maybe. But equally likely is the possibility that racial double standards reinforce stereotypes about smart whites and even smarter Asians. There are certainly wide gaps in the average SAT scores between blacks and Hispanics, on the one hand, and whites and Asians, on the other hand.

Among freshmen entering the University of Texas in 2009 who did not fall into the top 10% of their high school class (automatic admission at the university), Asians scored at the 93rd percentile of 2009 SAT takers nationwide, whites at the 89th percentile, Hispanics at the 80th percentile and blacks at the 52nd percentile. Startling? No. This picture has been well known for a long time. Heartbreaking, yes, because the numbers mean the underperforming minority students are being woefully ill served by the K-12 school system. Moreover, arriving at institutions of higher education with an academic disadvantage, they do not catch up, as it has become clear. 1. What is the Supreme Court going to hear?
2. How many justices will hear about the case?
3. Who bowed out?
4. Who is the person in the case?
5. Is she a Hispanic?
6. What race is she?
7. Why is she going to court?
8. What does the university say about its racial and ethnic diversity?
9. Has there been many cases like this in the Supreme Court?
10. When did it first come to light?
11. What did Asians score on the SAT nationwide?
12. Was this startling? Return numbered answers in your output.

output:
1. The case of Fisher v. University of Texas.
2. Eight
3. Elena Kagan
4. Abigail Fisher
5. No
6. White
7. She has been a victim of the university's race-conscious admission policies
8. That it's educationally enriching
9. Yes
10. Early 1970s
11. At the 93rd percentile
12. No