Premise:
"Apparently Thorn thought the same thing."
Hypothesis: Thorn did not agree with anyone elses ideas.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

no

input question: What are our goals and how will we achieve them? If this premise is true, does that tell us:"What is our goal for expanding the city and when do we plan to achieve it by? "?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: it is not possible to tell

Question:
Based on the premise "Women are doing great work nowadays, and Mademoiselle Cynthia is clever "oh, yes, she has brains, that little one."", can we conclude that "Mademoiselle Cynthia has demonstrated a near-complete lack of intellect and wit during her studies."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
no

Question: Sentence A: Or as an enlightened Neanderthal, profitably pretending to evolve?

Sentence B: The Neanderthal in question has ulterior motives for evolving.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question: This is particularly unwise because after weeks of raking Clinton, reporters and pundits are inclined to demonstrate their balance by going after the GOP.
The reporters would rather go after the GOP.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Problem: Here is a premise:
You were in fact offering it, as you'll see if you go back to the original, not as a considered characterization of my views, but as a way of introducing your own traditional/cultural explanation.

Here is a hypothesis:
If you go back and look, you'll see that you offered it in order to introduce your own explanation.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer:
yes