TASK DEFINITION: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.
PROBLEM: Comment: This is a microcosm of what seems to comprise so much of SA. It ha become a mafia state and it is impossible to see how it can be restored to what can be loosely described as normality. Corruption and thugs with big guns to defend it are endemic. What will transpire should a corruption resistant government come to power and attemt to clamp down on the wrongdoers? I shudder to think.

SOLUTION: Non-identity-attack

PROBLEM: Comment: You have to be an egotist to want the job. Drunken episodes when you were 18 will be examined. Your very identity as an American will be questioned. Every one of your proposals will be denounced. That $10 you bet on Nobody's Nag in the 8th race at the Bellwether Stakes that paid off will be questioned.
You have to believe "you", and only "you", have the vision to lead the nation -- unlike the other dwarves who are running.
But then, a true leader delivers.

SOLUTION: Non-identity-attack

PROBLEM: Comment: Well, crappy language aside, would you agree:
- you argue that differences between males and females is a explanation as to why women can never be ordained priests?
- that style of argument is what is meant by the ontological argument?
- that argument is no longer part of the magisterium's explanation, in so far as it was conspicuously dropped from Ordinatio Sacerdotalis?
- to invoke an obsolete argument in a current discussion is fairly described as metaphorically hauling something out of a closet?
- "deniers" is a fair epithet for those who deny that woman can be ordained?

The leaves only my adjective "crap" to describe the ontological argument. Yeah, I could have been more circumspect in expressing my "disdainful dismissal" of this argument. Note, BTW, that it is the argument that I "dismiss" as "crap" not those who haul it out of the closet.

Still, Pandora, if you have taken offence and feel you have been unfairly "labelled" and "dismissed", I apologize.

SOLUTION:
Non-identity-attack