In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.
One example is below.
Q: Comment: Damn! Another cloudy day, and it's all Obama's doing!
A: Obscene
Rationale: This is obscenity because it hints on sexual content that is offensive to the public sense of decency.
Q: Comment: Hodad: just because voters realize that public figures are unfit for office - Sarah Palin, Reagan and Drumpf, doesn't automatically go to hate. All of these individuals wanted and want the power and responsibility of some of the highest elected offices in the country. If a voter doesn't think they are up to the task or have personality traits conducive to success in the position - it is that voter's responsibility to indicate as such in forums such as this AND the voting booth. That isn't automatically hate and my suggestion to you is that you gradually move to realize that just because someone doesn't agree with your stance doesn't mean they hate you. Disagreement doesn't immediately mean you or they are being persecuted.
A:
Non-obscene