Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.

[Q]: And 10 years, in a Federal Prison.
A. Subsistance Hunting. In 1987 the International Whaling Commission (IWC) set a quota of 3...but only one was killed in 1987...since the men are now aged or dead.
http://www.fws.gov/ecos/ajax/docs/recovery_plan/whale_humpback.pdf
[A]: No

[Q]: Time to thank the leadership for the total sell out of Alaska to the oil industry....
[A]: No

[Q]: the whole kid dog scenario of yours frank is a good example of how someone with a negative opinion but nothing to support it spins a story to get support. Add your "he should be reported to the FAA" and it really looks like you are desperate prove this guy is an evil maniac instead of a dad protecting his child.
I wonder though, are you a dog lover or a gun hater? I am betting the latter, as most dog lovers, myself included know that dogs are not allowed to endanger children. EVER!
[A]:
No