IN: This is an email
Re: Deal discrepancies for the month of February. Following are the problems that have been brought to my attention and the solutions we've reached. Please call me with questions. This spreadsheet includes a missing purchase for total of 55 mw @ 195.00 on 2/25. Sorry for the confusion - per Bill Williams III. This spreadsheet includes modified volumes in the fixed price sale at ZP-26 on 2/6. In addition, deal 525625.2 has been corrected in scheduling (there was one strip duplicating HE 8) and autoscheduled. Deal 529314.1 has also been autoscheduled, which should remedy the discrepancy on 2/24, HE 7-17. Please let me know if the new CARP report does not reflect this. Thanks,

What is the subject?

OUT: EPMI/EES Sale Discrepancies - Feb
QUESTION: Congratulations Adam, and welcome to ETS to both of you!! You guys may not have heard this, but Mike Moran is retiring and I'm taking over for him as general counsel of the ETS organization. Does this all mean that I'm your lawyer again just like in the old Zond days??? Weird. Good luck and best wishes! DF
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: Enron Wind
Lisa: This is supporting documentation for a dispute from 12/01 with BPA. I will give you a hard copy of the request from Houston. Thanks!
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: BPA 12/01 - sale dispute
RE: My newly formed case of dyslexia! I switched the MW hours on these deals. 469098 should have 10 MW with Sempra. 467455 should have 50 MW with SCEM. These are correct in the system now, but I just wanted to alert you to my error. Thanks,
Answer: 467455/469098
Here is an email: Mark: Russell Diamond in credit said that you took a call from the WPS lawyer about 10 days ago. You entered the call into Lotus Notes. (1) What was the conversation about? (2) Did you assign this file to anyone? Thanks. Sara
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: WPS Energy Services ("WPS")
QUESTION: Kim, Please review this draft. I have not modified any language from the Enfolio to that contained in the draft of their form of contract which you forwarded to me last week. I will read their long form and see if it makes sense to include their language. Remember, in their short form, they had language for short breaks which was slightly diffent from ours but with a little torture, we could have incorporated their language once we got over the hurdle that we can't agree to let them audit our contracts, which means we could never show them what we got for the default quantity.
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS:
SMUD