Q: Can we conclude from "Group of men sitting around a table having a conversation." that "There are men playing hockey."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
A: Playing hockey is difficult to do while sitting around a table.
The answer is no.

QUESTION: Given the sentence "A woman in a black shirt and a bottle of beer standing in between two men with beer bottles wearing white shirts and black ties." can we conclude that "Three people standing holding bottles of beer."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Let's solve it slowly: A woman plus two men equal three people. Holding bottles of beer is a way of rephrasing with beer bottles.
The answer is yes.

[QUESTION] Premise: "A helicopter hovering over a landing spot."
Hypothesis: "The helicopter is carrying a vip."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
A helicopter hovering over a landing spot is not necessarily carrying a VIP.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

Q: Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "A person is riding a bike in a tunnel."
Hypothesis: "Person on bike."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
A: A person riding a bike means there is a person bike.
The answer is yes.

QUESTION: Given the sentence "Man in yellow kayak falls in the rapids." can we conclude that "The man fell in the rapids."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Let's solve it slowly: The man who was in the yellow kayak fell in the rapids.
The answer is yes.

QUESTION: Premise: "A lady and three small children all wearing jackets are walking hand in hand in the sidewalk of a busy downtown intersection."
Hypothesis: "A family of people walks on the sidewalk in a busy intersection."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?

Let's solve it slowly:
Not all a lady and three small children is a family.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.