Here is an email: Some notes on the attached lists: 3/24/00 List - the first two counterparties have no Legal changes per my earlier approvals. 3/27/00 List-we just got the financial master in signed and they cannot do pulp & paper and weather under it. Ambac Assurance Corp. and Salomon Smith Barney AAA Energy Fund - I have a temporary "no" for them for financial products until I get more information on them to determine what they are and what they can do. Per Credit, AMBAC only wants to trade credit derivatives, and Salomon Smith Barney is currently not an eligible swap participant and cannot trade any financial. If we get a parent guaranty in that can change their eligible swap participant status. In the meantime I am trying to get more information on the fund to determine what if anything they can do. 3/28/00 List-I previously had them shut down for all financial but am opening them up. I sent an email about that earlier this week.
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: Counterparty Approvals for 3/24/00, 3/27/00 and 3/28/00
Here is an email: Frank, Just wanted to let your area know as soon as possible that I was placed into a Standby status for call up to Active duty. I found this out over the weekend, my reserve unit was unable to provide me any type of time table of when I may be called be recalled or what the likely hood of this happening actually where. Last time I had talked to you, you mentioned that Enron was in the process of revamping their policies related to these types of matters, I know that you answered some questiones I had but is there anything that gives a complete rundown of what the total policies are? If so can I obtain a copy?
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: Military Reserves
Here is an email: Attached is the revised Petition whcih has been redlined against the draft provided last Saturday (September 15, 2001). The primary addition is the Senate Resolution on September 14 which declared that there was no longer an emergency. The tables in the Petition are being revised and should not be reviewed at this time. The following remains to be done: 1. Prepare the application for rehearing and request for immediate stay. This will be done by Douglass and will include new material not previously submitted (the commerce clause argument, a statement regarding the importation of power into California, the Senate Resolution of September 14, and the sealed declarations showing irreparable injury). 2. The refusal to grant the immediate stay will be the vehicle to satisfy the exhaustion of remedies issue so it will be necessary to force the Commission to act or to take some action which is tantamount to a denial. 3. The Petition must be placed in final form. This will require that a determination be made who will be a Petitioner in addition to Enron (the draft Petition assumes there will be direct access customers as Petitioners). Also, all citations and quotes will be verified, and the page references inserted from the Exhibit Folio. 4. The documents supporting the Petition will have to be compiled and placed into an Exhibit Folio. This will include the Application for Rehearing and sealed declarations. 5. It may be necessary to compile a folio of non-California authorities. I will check the California Rules of Court. 6. It will be necessary to prepare an Application for Immediate Stay and a proposed Order. 7. All pleadings will have to be prepared for filing and service. It is my assumption that the PUC will act on Thursday September 20, that the Application for Rehearing will be filed on September 21, and that the Petition will be filed at the earliest possible time during the week of September 24. Please provide your comments on the Petition no later than noon on Wednesday, September 19, 2001. Thanks. EWD
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A:
Revised Petition