[QUESTION] If "Firemen in uniform standing on a wet street looking up at a building." does that mean that "Firemen in uniform standing on a wet street looking up at a building that is engulfed in flames."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Because firemen are looking up at a building doesn't imply the building is engulfed in flames.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

Q: If "Two men sitting in chairs while waiting." does that mean that "More than one person is seated on pieces of furniture."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A: Chairs are furniture and two men refers to more than one person.
The answer is yes.

QUESTION: Given the sentence "This guy is in midair while wearing a red soccer uniform." can we conclude that "This guy is paying soccer in a red uniform."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Let's solve it slowly: One in midair wearing a soccer uniform can reasonably be assumed to be playing soccer.
The answer is yes.

[QUESTION] Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "A man is standing beside a train."
Hypothesis: "A girl is standing by a car."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
He refers to a man not a girl. They cannot be standing beside a train and a car simultaneously.
The answer is no.

Q: Given the sentence "A taxi going over the bridge with people standing or walking on the bridge." can we conclude that "A taxi parked in a parking lot."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A: The taxi cannot be both parked in a parking lot and moving over a bridge.
The answer is no.

[QUESTION] Premise: "A group of men playing ball out in a field."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A group of old men playing soccer out in a field." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Playing ball doesn't just mean soccer. It could be multiple sports.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.