instruction:
In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence can be inferred from the statement. Incorrect choices change the meaning in important ways or have details that are not mentioned in the statement. Indicate your answer as 1,2, or 3 corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.
question:
Statement: And it implies that the Harlem racket reverted to local control. Choices: 1. This shows us that the Harlem racket is under national control again. 2. That shows us that the Harlem racket is under local control. 3. We got what we wanted - the Harlem racket is under local control again.
answer:
2

question:
Statement: A key distinction between recreational and residential benefits is that only those people living in residential areas are assumed to receive benefits from residential visibility, while all households in the U.S. are assumed to derive some benefit from improvements in Class I areas. Choices: 1. Only people in residential areas are supposed to receive residential benefits. 2. Only people in residential areas are supposed to receive residential benefits, but many get around this. 3. Anyone may receive residential benefits.
answer:
1

question:
Statement: and then i would feel not only invaded in the sense that someone had obtained information from me that i would rather they didn't and that might be the sense of a spending pattern for instance that that i would have thought to be private but then if it turns out to generate Choices: 1. I would never feel invaded, even if they obtained information that I didn't want them to. 2. Private spending patterns, for instance, are very important for me. 3. If that happened I would feel not only invaded, in the sense that someone had obtained information from me, but in other ways aswell.
answer:
3