question: (CNN) -- It was far from vintage Barcelona, but it was enough to keep alive the Catalan club's dwindling hopes of retaining the Spanish league title.

With white handkerchiefs waving in the Camp Nou to indicate the fans' frustration at what appeared to be another disappointing setback, Lionel Messi came to the rescue on Sunday to earn a 2-1 victory against Athletic Bilbao.

Having been knocked out of the Champions League, then losing the Copa del Rey final to Real Madrid, Gerardo Martino's team had been staring down the barrel of an unthinkable fourth successive defeat.

With Atletico Madrid having gone seven points clear at the top of the table with Friday's 2-0 win over Elche, it would've spelled disaster if Barca could not recover from Aritz Aduriz's opener for the fourth-placed Basques.

The early signs weren't good.

After Messi had a goal ruled out for offside, Aduriz hit the Barca woodwork with a spectacular overhead kick, then Alexis Sanchez smacked the Bilbao bar when it seemed easier to score.

Aduriz ghosted through Barca's frail defense to slot in a low shot five minutes after the break, and teammate Markel Susaeta had an effort ruled out for offside soon after.

To the home supporters' intense relief, Pedro provided the equalizer in the 72nd minute with his 15th league goal this season, diverting a low shot from Sanchez into the net from close range.

Soon after that, Messi picked himself up after being fouled on the edge of the penalty area and fired a free-kick through the wall.
1. Did Messi have a goal ruled out?
2. When was the game?
3. What was the score?
4. Who hit the woodwork?
5. Who did they beat?
6. Where was Messi fouled?
7. What hopes did the win keep alive?
8. What is the coaches name?
9. What were they knocked out of?
10. What were fans waving?
11. What team is the article about?
12. What did the white handkerchiefs represent?
13. Who did they lose the Copa del Rey final to?
14. When did Pedro score?
****
answer: 1. Yes
2. Sunday
3. 2-1
4. Aduriz
5. Athletic Bilbao.
6. on the edge of the penalty area
7. Catalan club
8. Martino
9. Champions League
10. Camp Nou
11. Atletico Madrid
12. fans' frustration
13. Real Madrid
14. 72nd minute

A man who allegedly was with Aaron Hernandez the night Odin Lloyd was killed pleaded not guilty Friday to a single count of being an accessory to murder after the fact.

As members of his and Lloyd's family looked on, Carlos Ortiz uttered only those two words -- "not guilty" -- during his brief arraignment in Bristol County Superior Court in the southeastern Massachusetts city of Fall River. His next court date is set for November 20.

Ortiz is one of several people who have been charged in connection with Lloyd's death, though only one person -- Hernandez, who was a standout tight end for the New England Patriots before being released by the team the day of his arrest -- faces a murder count.

Like Hernandez, Ortiz hails from Bristol, Connecticut.

During Friday's court hearing, Ortiz's lawyer John Connors did not contest the $500,000 cash bail set for his client, though he could do so later.

"We don't have the grand jury minutes, we don't have a lot of the discovery statements, etc. So I think it's prudent to wait for the next date until we argue (bail)," Connors said.

Authorities have said that Hernandez, Ernest Wallace and Ortiz picked Lloyd up from his Boston apartment in a rental car shortly before he was found shot to death June 17 in a North Attleborough, Massachusetts, industrial park.

Surveillance cameras then captured the rental car leaving the crime scene and Hernandez carrying a gun as he returned to his home minutes later. He was with two other people. Lloyd -- a 27-year-old semi-pro football player himself -- was not among them. What are the answers to this following set of questions: 1. Who was with Aaron Hernandez when a man was killed?
2. Who was killed?
3. Who is getting in trouble for the actual death?
4. What is Carlos' role?
5. Where is he from?
6. In what state?
7. What is his bail amount?
8. Will they contest that?
9. Will they argue that in the future?
10. Where did the group pick up the victim?
11. In what town?
12. How did they pick him up?
13. When?
14. Do you know what year this happened?
15. Was he killed IN Boston?
16. Where then?
17. Is there a more specific location?
18. How did the police know about Hernandez, Wallace, and Ortiz?
19. Who was holding a weapon?
Answer: 1. Ernest Wallace and Carlos Ortiz
2. Odin Lloyd
3. Hernandez.
4. An accessory to murder.
5. Bristol.
6. Connecticut.
7. $500,000
8. No
9. Yes.
10. His apartment
11. Boston
12. In a rental car
13. June 17
14. No.
15. No
16. North Attleborough, Massachusetts.
17. In an industrial park.
18. Surveillance cameras
19. Hernandez.

input: Make use of the article to answer the questions. CHAPTER XXIII

SMOKE-JACK ALLEY

Launce. It is no matter if the ty'd were lost, for it is the unkindest ty'd that ever man ty'd.

Panthino. What's the unkindest ty'd?

Launce. Why, he that's ty'd here--Crab, my dog. SHAKESPEARE.

John Harewood returned, bringing with him what Alda took for a dressing-case, and Cherry for a drawing-box, but which proved to contain a wonderful genie to save the well-worn fingers many a prick. To Lance he first administered the magical words, 'All right,' and then making an opportunity, he put five sovereigns into his hand. Lance's first impulse was, however, not to thank, but to exclaim, 'Then Poulter has not got it?'

No, Poulter's conscience had forbidden him to purchase 'little Underwood's' treasure at what he knew to be so much beneath its value; but he had given Captain Harewood his best advice and recommendations, and by that means the violin had been taken at a London shop, still at a price beneath his estimate, but the utmost that could be expected where ready money was the point. Lance ought to have been delighted, and his native politeness made him repeat, 'Thank you'; but he could not quite keep down his regret--'Now I shall never see or hear her again.'

However, the next day, when Bernard flew upon him at twelve o'clock, asseverating that there was shade all the way, he allowed himself to be persuaded, prudently carrying with him only ten shillings, and trusting to his blue umbrella rather than to Bernard's shade, which could hardly have been obtained by sidling against the walls. 1. What did Alda think John had brought back?
2. Did Cherry think that too?
3. What did she think it was?
4. Was it?
5. What would it do?
6. Who did John talk to first?
7. What did he say to Lance?
8. How many sovereigns did he pay him?
9. Was Lance thankful?
10. Did Poulter buy the item?
11. Why not?
12. What is little Underwood's treasure?
13. Was it overvalued?
14. Where was the instrument?
15. Did Poulter talk to anyone about the violin?
16. Who?
17. Did Poulter give anyone advice?
18. Who?
19. Who came to see Lance the next day?
20. What time?
numbered_answers:
1. a dressing-case
2. No
3. a drawing-box
4. it contained a wonderful genie
5. save the well-worn fingers many a prick
6. unknown
7. All right,
8. five
9. No
10. No
11. his conscience
12. a violin
13. No
14. a London shop
15. Yes
16. Lance
17. Yes
18. Captain Harewood
19. Bernard
20. twelve o'clock