You will be given a definition of a task first, then an example. Follow the example to solve a new instance of the task.
Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.

hahahahahahahahhha suck it.
Solution: Yes
Why? The comment has the word 'suck' in it and is classified as sexually explicit. Hence, it is a positive example

New input: Ranger, Again thanks for citing the law as it is intended to be a just and good law. "No Exclusive Right or special privilege of fishery shall be created or authorized in the natural waters of the State." Please read this first sentence of the law again Mr. Granger. Now we get to where the ex gov and buddies convoluted themselves rights to our fish. "This section does not restrict the power of the State to limit entry into any fishery for the purpose of resource conservation,..." This means the State can limit entry into a fishery for resource management meaning NO one can fish or ALL can fish. It is greedy and corrupt to out currant and future Alaskans. My great grand kids should be able to fish. And not have to pay or suck up to the owner of the fish that are really public domain.
Solution:
Yes