Premise: "Finally, in compliance with section 604(a)(5), the analysis describes the significant alternatives considered and rejected, including universal applicability to commercial mobile voice services, automatic exclusion of all rural cellular carriers, and a Commission-developed set of standards for implementation." If this premise is true, what does that tell us about whether it entails the hypothesis "Significant alternatives were considered and dismissed in compliance with section 604(a)(5) and section 605(a)(2)."?
it is not possible to tell