In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: The author quotes a professor who states "police reluctance to work with feminist legal groups mirrors a sentiment common to employees of any company.' Several years ago, I attended a complaint of sexual assault where a woman called to report she had been sexually assaulted at a party. When I got to her home, she was accompanied by a local Rape Relief representative. As I spoke to the woman, I was continually interrupted by the Rape Relief rep, to the extent that I asked her to leave the room. It turned out that the sex was consensual, and that the woman was actually intent on a guilt/revenge thing. What actually happened is that following a fight with her boyfriend, she stormed off, went to the party, got drunk and had sex. Upon returning home, she said "look what happened to me," and then reported it as a rape at the urging of her beau. Unfounded!!!!!
I also told the Rape Relief worker to go ahead and complain. She never did.

Output: Sexual-explicit

Input: Consider Input: Comment: Just because they fly them, or should I say 'have a committment to fly them', doesn't mean they are the best choice today. And besides, of all the countries you list, Australia, Canada, Britain and many others have all bailed. It is an expensive piece of junk that would get shot down in droves using the scenarios that they envisioned for it. Besides, we have no F-22's to provide air cover AND how would you ever install specialized hangers and DC generators in Canada's climate. That, and the exploding fuel tanks. As for the USN, they have flown (1), ONE F-35 off of a carrier. Big hairy deal. Are you even aware of the 'factoid' that both the Russian and Chinese radars can pick these slow moving beasts up 160 KM out from their missile sites (i.e S-400)? Expensive, full of flaws, impossible to maintain without selling the Province of British Columbia to raise cash, and obsolete before they even roll out.

Methinks you are an industry mule.

Output: Non-sexual-explicit

Input: Consider Input: Comment: Funny because Colorado is a red state the last 30 years. We did a great job while your sorry boulder ass was gone.
Output: Sexual-explicit