Problem: We're not going to side door, you know, a bias argument by going into context. Context is a dangerous thing as it relates to what we're doing here. So, no, it's -- we presume that the statement was likely given to the reporter upon a question being asked by the reporter, although it could have been volunteered. That's of no moment.

Based on the paragraph above can we conclude that "We will not risk exploring context."?

A: Yes

Problem: More than two weeks after Pamela Hutchinson's murder in Fort Myers Beach, Lois Riess, known as the "Fugitive Grandma," was in police custody Saturday in Florida. Riess is accused of befriending Hutchinson at a beach restaurant, then murdering her to steal the victim's identity, cash, and car.

Based on the paragraph above can we conclude that "The nature in which Pamela died was no accident."?

A: Yes

Problem: [India], Sep 14 (ANI): Sukhdev Singh, a head constable of the 5th battalion of National Disaster Response Force (NDRF) unit, in Pune has been missing since September 8. According to the NDRF, Singh boarded a train from Mumbai for his hometown Amritsar on September 8, and has been untraceable since then. When the cop, who was supposed to reach Amritsar on September 9, didn't reach home on the scheduled date, his son approached the NDRF. A search operation to find Singh was launched but he could not be traced. An FIR was registered with Mumbai railway police in the matter on September 13. (ANI)

Based on the paragraph above can we conclude that "Sukhdev Singh was born in 1934."?

A:
It's impossible to say