Answer the questions at the end based on the text.

Islamabad, Pakistan (CNN) -- A Pakistani court Monday gave police two weeks to prepare their case for charging five Americans whom police suspect of planning terrorist attacks.

Authorities have said they plan to prosecute the five men -- who are being held in jail -- under the country's anti-terrorism act.

A court hearing was set for January 18.

Police have said they are confident that the Americans were planning terrorist acts, according to Tahir Gujjrar, deputy superintendent of police in Sargodha, where the men were arrested December 9.

Gujjrar told CNN a preliminary investigation suggests that the men came to Pakistan to wage jihad and had sought to link up with Jaish-e-Mohammed and Jamaat-ud-Dawa militant organizations, neither of which showed interest, he said. The men wanted to martyr themselves, he said.

Jaish-e-Mohammed is the group believed to be responsible for the murder of journalist Daniel Pearl.

But Mohammed Ameer Khan Rokhri, an attorney representing the men, said they testified on the Quran, the Muslim holy book, "that they have no connection with any banned organization," including Jaish-e-Mohammed or al Qaeda.

They told the court, "We are going to Afghanistan to help the Muslims who have been injured by the NATO forces and other Afghan forces," the attorney said. And they said the didn't intend to commit any crime in Pakistan, he said.

The five young men are identified as Ahmed Abdullah Minni, Umar Farooq, Aman Hassan Yemer, Waqar Hussain Khan and Ramy Zamzam. All are in their early 20s except Yemer, who, according to the interrogation report from Pakistani police, is 18 years old. Two of the suspects are Pakistani-American, two are Yemeni-American, and one is Egyptian-American.

1. When does the trial start?
2. And they were arrested when?
3. Where?
4. Who is head of the cops?
5. And his title?
6. What was their agenda?
7. And their nationality?
8. How many are jailed?
9. How long until trial?
10. What jurisdiction?
11. What were the charged attempting to start?
12. Did they work with military groups?
13. Which ones?
14. And their reasoning?
15. Who is likely behind the death of Daniel Pearl?
16. Did they enter a guilty plea?
17. What did they testify on?
18. And what is that?
19. Who is their representative in court?
20. How old are the suspected terrorists?

Numbered answers:

A: 1. January 18
2. December 9.
3. Sargodha
4. Tahir Gujjrar
5. deputy superintendent of police
6. terrorist acts
7. Americans
8. five
9. two weeks
10. Pakistani
11. jihad
12. Yes
13. Jaish-e-Mohammed and Jamaat-ud-Dawa
14. to martyr themselves
15. Jaish-e-Mohammed
16. No
17. Quran
18. Muslim holy book
19. Mohammed Ameer Khan Rokhri
20. early 20s except Yemer, who is 18 years old

Answer the questions at the end based on the text.

(CNN) -- Nobody likes politicians.

Ever since Jimmy Carter won his way to the White House in 1976 by assuring voters that they could trust him in contrast to the more experienced opponents he faced, both Republican and Democratic candidates have tended to boast about every part of their resume that can distinguish themselves from the Washington status quo.

In 2008, then-Sen. Barack Obama undercut the "inevitable" Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton by running as the candidate who was the least corrupted by the bargaining ways of Capitol Hill. Through its portrayal of Sen. John McCain's selection of Sarah Palin, the HBO film "Game Change" effectively captures just how far political candidates are willing to go to have this appeal.

This year, the story is the same. Although President Obama is boasting of his accomplishments in the White House as the nation's leader, he is also using Congress as a foil to lambaste the way that the "real" insiders in the capital do their business. Newt Gingrich and Rick Santorum have tried to transform themselves from pillars of the congressional Republican establishment into conservative mavericks, while front-runner Mitt Romney talks frequently about how he would bring the skills of a CEO to Washington.

The problem is that doing well in Washington requires a very different kind of skill set than the ones that business executives or mavericks bring to the table. Each of these claims is flawed -- as Obama himself discovered -- given the world in which presidents must operate.

Presidents govern in a porous world that makes every move and decision visible to the public within a relatively short time span. Constant scrutiny from the media means the president essentially works inside glass walls.

1. When was Carter elected?
2. What did he tell voters about himself?
3. Are presidents constantly being evaluated by the media?
4. Obama claimed to be less corrupted than who?
5. When was that?
6. Was Hillary the Republican nominee?
7. What was the political movie about Palin?
8. What are both party's candidates tried to be different from?
9. What was Obama's job in 2008?
10. Who made that political movie?
11. What requires a different set of skills than businessmen?

Numbered answers:

A: 1. 1976
2. that they could trust him in contrast to the more experienced opponents he faced
3. yes
4. Hillary Clinton
5. 2008
6. no
7. "Game Change"
8. the Washington status quo
9. he was a senator
10. HBO
11. doing well in Washington

Answer the questions at the end based on the text.

CHAPTER XIII

We all knew Isobel's history. It had taken barely twenty minutes to tell it, but they had been twenty minutes of tragedy. We were all, I think, in different ways affected. Monsieur Feurgeres alone sat back in his seat like a carved image, his face white and haggard, his deep-set eyes fixed upon vacancy. We felt that he had passed wholly away from the world of present things. He himself was lingering amongst the shadows of that wonderful past, upon which he had only a moment before dropped the curtain. He had told us to ask him questions, but I for my part felt that questions just then were a sacrilege. Arthur, however, seemed to feel nothing of this. It was he who took the lead.

"Isobel, then," he said, "is the granddaughter of the King of Waldenburg, the only child of his eldest daughter! Her mother was divorced from her husband, Prince of Herrshoff, and afterwards married to you. What about her father?"

"He died two years after the divorce was granted," Feurgeres said without turning his head. "Isobel was hurried away from the Court through the influence of her aunt, the Archduchess of Bristlaw, and sent to a convent in France. It was not intended that she should ever reappear at the Court of Waldenburg."

"Why not?"

"The King is very old, and he is the richest man in Europe. Isobel is the daughter of his eldest and favourite child. The Archduchess also has a daughter, and, failing Isobel, she will inherit."

1. Who knew of Isobel's history?
2. Was it a happy story?
3. What kind of story was it?
4. Was it a long story?
5. HOw did Monsieur Feurgeres look?
6. where was he lingering?
7. Who was Isobel related to?
8. How?
9. Where her parents married?
10. Where is her father now?
11. when?
12. Where did Isobel go after that?
13. where?
14. Was she to come back?
15. why?
16. Was the King going to live a long time?
17. why?
18. Did he have a lot of money?
19. What was her Aunts title?
20. Did she have a son?

Numbered answers:

A:
1. They all did
2. no
3. tragedy.
4. 20 minutes long
5. White and haggard,
6. in the shadows of the past
7. the King of Waldenburg,
8. his granddaughter
9. divorced
10. Died
11. 2 years after the divorce
12. a convent
13. in France
14. no
15. her aunt wants her daughter to inherit instead
16. probably not
17. he's very old
18. yes
19. the Archduchess of Bristlaw,
20. no