Q: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.
Comment: In the real world bankers commit fraud in New York and London and get away with it. Witness 2008. No banker went to jail but that was "results" and performance for the bankers, but not so much for everyone else. It highlights the massive corruption in the western banking system. So maybe some noble principles and intentions would be refreshing from cynical,smarmy, conservatives lecturing others on how to think and how to live.

By the way Point three is false. You can tell who is noble and just by watching them and holding them to account when their actions give the lie to their words. Harpers gang of morons took actions that were ignoble and unjust. That is why people hated him so much. It was unjust to prorogue parliament. It was ignoble to suggest special laws for Muslims. It was stupid to cut science budgets rather than invest in the future. It is unjust that we don't have enough judges to have trials in a timely fashion. It was stupid to get rid of the long form census etc
A:
Non-obscene