We have reviewed the assignments Jean sent out earlier in the week. At this time I think the split is OK. I would like for you to put in writing for me the following: Who is your back up on critical reports, etc when you are out. I would like for that back up to be someone that was NOT on your original team. This may help us address the issue of the two "old" teams merging. For example I am assuming if one rep has the shipper business and another rep has the operator business for the same company, then those two reps should back each other's desk. Randy Janzen is backing up Jean Adams desk on Lamar Power Plant since he has AEP which is shipper that does business at the Lamar Plant. Scott and Kathy support each other's desk since Kathy has ElPaso as a Shipper and Scott has ElPaso as Operator. Harry and Joe support each other on Oneok since Harry has Bushton and Joe has the gathering The areas of concern in relation to day to day business are below and need specific back up reps. GPM Monthly Pricing Report Lamar Power Plant True Ups PVR Report Oneok Gathering Reporting NNG Administrative Contracts SPS Power Plant True Up Conoco Power Plant True Up MOPS Daily Report The HIgh profile shippers/Operators that need specific back ups are as follows: Duke/GPM Oneok Transcanada Dynegy Reliant ElPaso West Texas Gas If there is any confusion with the email, please do not hesitate to call Terry or myself. Thanks. Lynn
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: Team Shipper/Operator Assignments
Effective May 22, 2001, Enron Netherlands Generation B.V., a Netherlands corporation, changed its name to Energy Development Company B.V. Evidence is filed in the Houston 48th floor corporate vault. Please share this information with other interested parties. NOTE: Sylvia Hu - evidence to follow by hand.
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: Name change
***REMINDER*** We have not yet received your feedback. Your input is very valuable and to be included in the participant's summary report, it must be received NO LATER THAN CLOSE OF BUSINESS on Tuesday, May 1, 2001. Without your feedback, the participant may not receive a summary report or be eligible to attend the program.
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: TIME SENSITIVE: Executive Impact & Influence Program Survey
Drew, here's my first stab at a rehearing argument. I did not go as far as I could have because I really think we should argue that there should be no limitation at all and that TW should be able to decide for itself what capacity it can sell as firm. Instead, I've proposed a solution that will be less controversial, as we discussed earlier this week. If you think this passes the laugh test I can do some rewriting and circulate it. My biggest concern is portraying PNM's capacity as "firm" or "interruptible" since PNM does not use that terminology, in its tariff or otherwise, except to assure us over the phone that it is firm! I'd like to check to see if PNM is comfortable with all this before we file anything. Call when you can; this is not due 'til Oct. 15.
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer:
PNM