Q: Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "Farmers are performing their agriculture during the day."
Hypothesis: "There are no crops to tend to."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
A: Farmers cannot be performing their agriculture if there are no crops.
The answer is no.

QUESTION: If "Two men standing with leaf blowers." does that mean that "Two men are standing in the leaf-covered yard."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Let's solve it slowly: It makes sense that the men would be standing in a leaf-covered yard if they have leaf blowers.
The answer is yes.

[QUESTION] Premise: "The sky glows a vivid yellow in the sun."
Hypothesis: "The sky is shining on a flower."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
A glowing sky does not imply the sky is shining on a flower.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

Q: Premise: "Two workers are putting up a billboard."
Hypothesis: "Two workers are putting up an advertisement billboard."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
A: The fast that two workers are putting up a billboard does not necessarily suggest that they are putting up an advertisement billboard.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

QUESTION: Premise: "Young boy in white shirt runs on a track holding a marker."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "Young boy was dancing in a disco." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Let's solve it slowly: If the boy runs on a track then he is not dancing in a disco.
The answer is no.

QUESTION: Can we conclude from "Two dogs are catching blue frisbees in grass." that "The two dogs are playing."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell

Let's solve it slowly:
Dogs who are catching Frisbees could also be described as playing Frisbee.
The answer is yes.