TASK DEFINITION: Categorize the comment on the basis of severe toxicity. If the comment is severely toxic output Yes, otherwise output No.
PROBLEM: I see no need for the Republicans to go through even the most basic of motions on this. They will ram through whatever they want to, regardless of dissenting opinion or public input, so they may as well just dispense with the pleasantries and get on with it. At this point, the theatrics are for no one but themselves.

SOLUTION: No

PROBLEM: Actually that is exactly the fourth and latest excuse Lisa sent me as to why she was opposed to giving Merrick Garland the traditional hearings and votes for SCOTUS. She said that as Chair of a Committee she had to respect Chairman Grassley's obstructionist refusal to hold Judiciary hearings. Right? Doesn't matter if the Chairman is working contrary to historic Congressional norms in her eyes, all that matters is that he is a Chairman. Sort of like how she supports the ludicrously unqualified Trump simply because he is the Republican nominee. Party over country over and over again for Murkowski.

SOLUTION: No

PROBLEM: It is likely that his "patients" were selling the drugs he gave them. After they do that it becomes very difficult to track what kind of harm the drugs "doctor" Ahmad was prescribing have caused. The first rule of medicine is "First, do no harm." This well-dressed low-life doesn't give a crap what kind of harm he causes as long as he gets paid.

SOLUTION:
Yes