In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Example Input: Comment: I think he has talked about keeping the second amendment strong so that every day citizens can defend themselves against terrorist attacks. Hilary wants to disarm citizens yet she is surrounded by armed body guards. Hypocrisy!
Example Output: Non-obscene

Example Input: Comment: Gee.. don't know about that.. The article was quite sarcastic, but then suppose that is what comedy is all about..

Though, this topic was not about a CBC comedy series... this is a serious issue for both sides, but then that is another Canadian perspective.

Further, there seems, as well, to be much larger issues which are at play globally concerning this religion; it seems to have a number of jihadist terror organizations that are associated with it -- that right there could be the poisonous fly in the ointment ; clearer communication from all facets of the Muslim World needs to be spoken to that reality, including an explanatory resonance of reason concerning of this non-integration with 'Infidels and Jews'..

There are a number of issues that are 'fluffed-off' which is a darn good reason why 'martyrdom' is not what is needed here by Islam -- a good solid sit-down integrated respectful discussion with all the players is.. both Male & Female.. with or without the religious sartorial.
Example Output: Obscene

Example Input: Comment: The issue is exactly then about "pieces" because the Rehabilitation Experiment, DHHL, was strictly for 50% or more blood quantum Polynesian-Hawaiians. So, unless Congress changes it, which won't happen, then only those folks would benefit, not the Wilcoxs, or the Johnsons. Certainly the Courts would not allow the definition to be twisted to mean someone with 1/1024th blood.
That's why the sovereignty activists are trying to push the definition to anyone with a Polynesian-Hawaiian ancestry to pre-contact Capt. Cook time. Under that definition everyone with one drop is a Polynesian. Of course there were no written records, so corruption as always in these hair brained schemes would be rampant.
This is now the year 2017. What did anyone really think these race based Polynesian only programs, and segregated Polynesian schools would ultimately produce?
Example Output:
Non-obscene