We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control) into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Q: Sent1: Even back in the 60's gun owners were saying that if you outlaw guns, only outlaws will have guns, and gun safety being stressed, and maybe even mandatory for children will produce benefits.
Sent2: You claimed that the Supreme Court gave the green light to all kinds of bans and restrictions on guns and ammunition, something that never took place.

A: Not similar
****
Q: Sent1: The problem is that widespread guns means greater criminal access to guns which means greater criminal gun use which means bad things.
Sent2: Illegal firearms can be identified and linked to other firearms and to crimes and criminals.

A: Not similar
****
Q: Sent1: You are arguing in favor of charging someone with a crime after they were shown to be a victim of crime by having their private property stolen.
Sent2: The first thing you need to do when someone is charged with a crime is understand what the charge is and what must be proved.

A:
Not similar
****