In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

[EX Q]: Comment: miloscia, you're in the wrong. you didnt have your words twisted. you pandered to your base and got called out for spewing nonsense. advice: if you need this sort of space to not sound crazy, stay off social media.

but youre right about 1 thing: "mr. federal way" is the opposite of journalism. he stains the mirrors credibility. whoever is behind him has no integrity, no ethics, and no spine. if its someone on the mirror payroll then i hope theyre blacklisted from other news jobs.
[EX A]: Non-identity-attack

[EX Q]: Comment: I think you'll find the great majority of terrorist activity is homegrown white males.

Are you suggesting that the shooter in Quebec City was a Radical Islamist? Or Marc Lepine?

How about Timothy McVeigh?

All Jihadis are not Muslim, there are many Christian fundamentalists who use their religion as a motivation for mass killings.
[EX A]: Identity-attack

[EX Q]: Comment: I do not pretend to understand the detailed conflict between the Springs and Pueblo. I appreciate your post that describes a long running problem. What I do understand is that the EPA is broken and untrustworthy. It has never had as much money as it receives presently. What it lacks is accountability (no one was sanctioned or fired for the Gold King Mine fiasco) and competent leadership. Scott Pruitt is taking over an entrenched bureaucracy of political hacks. The EPA may be right on this issue, but I don't trust them.
[EX A]:
Non-identity-attack