Premise:
"uh This Present Darkness and uh uh i forget the title the other well he uh he's also written a lot of children how old is your daughter"
Hypothesis: His children's books are very well written and are interesting to kids.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

it is not possible to tell

input question: well i i i hope that they will change uh but but i'm i just i know it's going to be a slow change uh i i feel as though a lot of people are going back to just having a one wage earner i mean i'm just thinking of my circle of people that i know i know quite a few people who have decided to not have both both uh couples you know both uh of the parents work and yet um If this premise is true, does that tell us:"I know a few couples who have decided that only one of them goes to work."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: yes

Question:
Based on the premise "His death in 1591 by seppuku (the ritual disemboweling more crudely known to Westerners as harakiai) was in fact commanded by Toyotomi Hideyoshi, his former friend and patron.", can we conclude that "The was commanded to commit seppuku because he had been a coward."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
it is not possible to tell

Question: Sentence A: Just go on with what you're doing now.

Sentence B: Carry on with the task you have at hand,

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Question: But I still can't understand why Inglethorp was such a fool as to leave it there when he had plenty of opportunity to destroy it.
I can understand why Inglethorp would destroyed it.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Problem: Here is a premise:
What particular figure have you in mind?

Here is a hypothesis:
What figure were you thinking about?

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer:
yes