Question: Sentence A: So Clinton wouldn't perjure himself and, as I argued Sunday, an apology is likely to kill the appetite for any impeachment hearings (over obstruction, Whitewater, Filegate, etc.).

Sentence B: An apology by Clinton will not make it less likely for him to get impeached.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Question: The natural snowfall is often augmented by snow-making equipment to ensure adequate powder.
Only natural snow is used there.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Problem: Here is a premise:
and uh so he went in and now he's a registered voter but he would not vote before that

Here is a hypothesis:
For some reason, he doesn't want to be a registered voter.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Sentence 1: Angel Park Golf Club is a municipal course with a it has two 18-hole courses designed by Arnold Palmer and a 12-hole par-3 course featuring replicas of famous par-3 holes from around the world.

Sentence 2: Angel Park Golf Club has a couple of 18 hole courses.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: yes

Question:
One sacred symbol, which is at odds with their peaceful lifestyle, is the labrys (double-headed sword).

Does it follow that "However, the labrys originates from an ancient wartime past."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
it is not possible to tell

Question:
Based on the premise "But then this very particular island is hardly in danger of being invaded except, of course, by tourism.", can we conclude that "This island is least likely to be invaded by tourism."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
no