In this task, you're given a statement, and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence clearly disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3' corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

Input: Consider Input: Statement: These uncertainties can be reduced by careful consideration of the differences in the health risk or air pollution commodity and the study populations in the underlying economic literature versus the context of benefits conferred by the Clear Skies Act. Choices: 1. There is no way to reduce these uncertainties at this time. 2. Careful observation and studying of health risks by air pollution can help ease uncertainties. 3. The risk of air pollution is the most important type of pollution which should be carefully considered.

Output: 1

Input: Consider Input: Statement: Therefore, the National Energy Plan recommended that the Administration's approach include appropriate measures to address local concerns, such as the unlikely occurrence of an SO2 hot spot or area of concentrated emissions. Choices: 1. The National Energy Plan recommended that the Administration's address the unlikely occurrence of an SO2 hot spot or area of concentrated emissions. 2. The National Energy Plan did not have any recommendations for the Administration's approach to address local concerns. 3. The occurrence of an SO2 hot spot or area of concentrated emissions in unlikely but highly dangerous.

Output: 2

Input: Consider Input: Statement: uh-huh what what what bothers the heck out of me is uh one of these so-called American made cars where part of it's put together in Japan and what you've got is you've got standard and metric Choices: 1. All cars use the same measurement system throughout. 2. Some cars are in both standard and metric, it's aggravating. 3. Some cars are in both standard and metric.
Output: 1