In this task, you're given a pair of sentences, sentence 1 and sentence 2. Your job is to determine if the two sentences clearly agree/disagree with each other, or if this can't be determined. Indicate your answer as yes or no respectively.

Q: Sentence 1: Left to decide what part of the 1996 Act to strike as invalid, the court concluded that congressional intent regarding severability was unclear. Sentence 2: The court was able to decide which parts, if any, of the 1996 Act were invalid.

A: yes
****
Q: Sentence 1: Participants stressed that having the right people on the board was just as important if not more so than having the right rules. Sentence 2: Participants said that the right people more so than the right rules was what mattered.

A: yes
****
Q: Sentence 1: For a long time they were a stumbling-block to me until I remembered a very significant fact: that she and Alfred Inglethorp were cousins. Sentence 2: I recalled that she and Alfred Inglethorp were cousins.

A:
yes
****