In this task, you must classify if a given review is positive/negative, indicating your answer as P or N.

near the end of 1996 , analysts remarked that the year would be the last in which disney would stand alone as the animation king .
the following year , 1997 , saw the first sleeper entry into the genre from a studio other than the magic kingdom : twentieth century fox gave baronial russia to the masses in the form of anastasia .
at best , that 's all it was -- a sleeper hit , designed to surprise but not shake the industry .
in 1998 , however , things have been decidedly different .
there have been a number of pushes on disney 's death grip on the market , and fifty - one weeks into ' 98 , a new champion has emerged
.
dreamworks ' the prince of egypt succeeds where all of the other conventionally animated products have failed .
the other two contenders , warner brothers ' quest for camelot and disney 's own annual entry , mulan , lacked inspiration and drive respectively .
although camelot was borderline - abysmal , and ca n't really be considered a shot at the title , mulan had the makings of winner .
unfortunately , it was saturated with traditional , disney - cute animation , and lost points against the rapidly - changing face of the competition .
in making the prince of egypt , dreamworks has strayed from all of these hallmarks and created a genuinely unique product .
the animation is flawless , and , aside from a bug 's life , is the best - looking movie to date .
the animators have nimbly mixed both flat and spatial effects , and the 2d/3d combination is something that artists from disney and fox have heretofore struggled with .
the key to success , however , was that the visuals were used not just because they looked cool but also as a method of advancing the plot .
namely , some of the most important action sequences ( like the parting of the red sea ) were done almost entirely in 3d .
dreamworks is the first studio to prove that they 've got the stuff of success , and that they 're capable of challenging disney .
the story is also well - written , and the characters voiced with talent . for the most part , the plot follows its source material -- the book of exodus -- although only in the most general sense .
the writers took a few creative liberties , and most do not damage the story in any way .
in fact , the shakespearean relationship between moses ( val kilmer ) and the pharaoh rameses ( ralph fiennes ) makes the story more interesting if anything .
moses , a hebrew , is saved from the slaughter of the firstborn sons by his mother when she sets him in a basket on the nile ; he floats into the pharaoh seti ( patrick stewart ) 's palace and is taken in by the royal family .
moses grows up but learns of his heritage and flees into the desert , where he discovers the burning bush and is commissioned by god to return to egypt and free the slaves .
by this time , rameses is now pharaoh , and the two brothers , now on opposite sides of the line , face off in a battle of wills and divine intervention .
the cast of voices is most impressive , and also includes such noteables as sandra bullock , jeff goldblum , danny glover , and steve martin .
the script does not have a lot of one - liners in it , and god is reduced to a voice that might well be mistaken for the same one that spoke to kevin costner in field of dreams , but overall the story is exciting and interesting .
it 's decidedly for an older crowd , and the tykes who have n't had a few years of religion class will be hopelessly lost .
but for those who make the bid , the prince of egypt can be a great watch .
P