Problem: Zoo<br>When we were in Chicago my friends and I went to the zoo. We spent the whole day there, observing the animals. The animals in the zoo appeared to be happy enough. However, by the end of the day my friend was very sad. She realized that seeing caged animals made her depressed.

Based on the paragraph above can we conclude that "Seeing caged animals makes my friend sad."? OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No

A: Yes
Q: Fur is used in Canada.
Unlike seal hunting in Canada, where pups are hunted for fur, poachers in China catch seals primarily to sell to zoos or to use the genital organs for traditional Chinese medicine.
OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No
A: Yes
I think that we do. It's pollution, carbon dioxide, and other chemicals that are even more potent, but in smaller quantities, that cause this. Look, the world's temperature is going up, weather patterns are changing, storms are getting more violent and unpredictable.
It is reasonable to at least consider it possible that these statements were made by someone that considers global warming to be a threat to the planet. OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No
A: Yes
input hypothesis: In the country of Italy, big protests by students and university staff against government reforms to higher education brought parts of central Rome
Context: In Italy, big protests by students and university staff against government reforms to higher education brought parts of central Rome to a standstill on Tuesday.
OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No
true or false: Yes
Context:
How to improve your intelligence<br>Try new things. Novelty stimulates the brain, so being open to new experiences is important to boosting your intelligence. New experiences tend to increase neural activity in the brain, which can help improve intelligence over time.
Hypothesis: Being open to new experiences is likely to make you more stupid OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No
No
Problem: Experts share their insights on implications for businesses following changes in the anti-graft Act Why was there a need to amend the anti-graft law? The Prevention of Corruption Act was enacted three decades ago in 1988. Since then, several major socio-economic changes have taken place. During this time the international stance on bribery and corruption has also become way more stringent. In May 2011, India ratified the United Nations Convention Against Corruption. In this context, the 1988 Act was being considered a bit archaic, if not completely obsolete. Therefore, a need for ...

Based on the paragraph above can we conclude that "there exists an anti-graft law"? OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No

A:
Yes