Please note the following additions to the domestic credit reserve for September 2001: CP: Williams Energy Marketing & Trading Deal No: 775595.1 EOL No: 1859565 Deal Date: 9/14/2001 Deal Specifics: EPMI to buy 50MW Off-Peak Power from Cinergy for Calendar Year 2004. Term: 1/1/2004 thru 12/31/2004 Volume: 50 MWs Off-Peak Price: $22.25 Delivery Point: Cinergy Trader/Mid-Marketer: Fletch Sturm Credit Reserve Amount: $23,000 (twenty-three thousand US dollars) CP: Williams Energy Marketing & Trading Deal No: 775263.1 EOL No: 1858493 Deal Date: 9/14/2001 Deal Specifics: EPMI to buy 50MW Off-Peak Power from Entergy for Calendar Year 2004. Term: 1/1/2004 thru 12/31/2004 Volume: 50 MWs Off-Peak Price: $21.00 Delivery Point: Entergy Trader/Mid-Marketer: Mike Carson Credit Reserve Amount: $23,000 (twenty-three thousand US dollars) CP: Williams Energy Marketing & Trading Deal No: 775260.1 EOL No: 1858473 Deal Date: 9/14/2001 Deal Specifics: EPMI to buy 50MW Off-Peak Power from Entergy for Calendar Year 2004. Term: 1/1/2004 thru 12/31/2004 Volume: 50 MWs Off-Peak Price: $21.00 Delivery Point: Entergy Trader/Mid-Marketer: Mike Carson Credit Reserve Amount: $23,000 (twenty-three thousand US dollars) RAC: transaction confirmed under Executed EEI dated 2/1/1997. Please call w/any questions. Kortney x30616
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: Williams Cal 04 Reserve for EOL
I have reviewed the La Plata Facilities O&O Agreement. Lee, could you please review the same and see if you agree with this assessment? It appears to me that the pigging facilties could qualify as either of the following: Special Services. This would be subject to prior written consent and agreement between the Operator (TW) and the Operating Committee (TW & NWPLRepresentatives). If NWPL agreed, their share of the cost would be in proportion to their ownership interest. If we did obtain their approval, future O&M cost attributable to the pigging facilities could be shared among the owners. (We've agreed to a flat fee for 2000 through 2003 with a 3.5% escalator starting in 2001.) Addition or Expansion. Demonstrate that the pigging will add incremental transmission capacity. We have to give notice to NWPL and they have 60 days to participate. If they participate, they share in the cost at their ownership interest, but they get a share of the incremental capacity at their ownership interest. If they don't indicate a desire to participate in 60 days, we can proceed with the Expansion (without any approval, but also no cost sharing). Also, any incremental O&M associated with an expansion cannot be passed on to any owners not participating in such expansion. I think if we went the Special Services route, we would need to justify the need for these facilities to maintain the integrity and efficiency of the facilities at current levels. I think we would spend alot of time arguing this with them and in the end they would probably approve it subject to them not incurring any cost. (They probably don't have $260,000 ($1.5MM * .174) sitting around in a budget somewhere that they'd like to fork over for these facilities.) Rich, what do you think? How difficult would it be to demonstrate that these facilities are necessary for maintaining the current operating levels of the facilities? Recommendation: To save us the 60 days notice period of an Expansion, I think we should notify them that it's a necessary Special Service and ask for approval (& to pass along their share of the cost), but to be prepared to eat 100% of the costs to obtain their timely approval and proceed with the installation of the facilities. In this event we would need to agree on the inclusion of future O&M attributable to these facilities. FYI, their ownership interest is still officially 22.3% since they have not executed the Amendment that has been tendered to them 3 times, first by me and twice by Lynn Blair. If they execute the Amendment that incorporates the 4/1/98 expansion of the facilities, their ownership interest will be 17.4%.
Answer: Installation of Pigging Facilities
Here is an email: Jeff, Last Wednesday morning, I was fortunate to share breakfast with you. I thoroughly enjoyed the hour that you spent with us. At the end of the hour, I gave to you a one page summary of a tremendous energy devise that has received extreme interest from the likes of Conoco, Anadarko, and Texaco. As I quickly mentioned, the inventor of this geothermal apparatus is in town this week. Have you had the opportunity to quickly review this paper? If so, do you feel as though Enron might have some interest in further discussions with the inventors? This could be a tremendous new, innovative opportunity for Enron. I look forward to your response. Steve Roeder 58124
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: last week's breakfast- energy opportunity
Q: When posting Short Term Curves -> you are posting a 6x8+24 into the 7x8 price column. For Short Term the 7x8 column is your 6x8+24 price. (The 6x8+24 price column is not relevant to you.) Please use this order when posting: ON PEAK SUNDAY OFF PEAK
Propose a subject line
A: Position Manager
IN: IMPORTANT MESSAGE! PLEASE READ THIS MESSAGE! FILENET SYSTEM OUTAGE AUGUST 17 - 19, 2001 All users will NOT be able to access the System after close of business on Friday the 17th and we anticipate users having full access on Monday morning August 20th. The FileNET System is scheduled to be down for maintenance to start upgrade process to IMS 3.5. This upgrade will be done in several stages, the first stage being the Oracle database. For this upgrade all batches scanned or imported into queues must be cleared from the FileNET System by Friday, August 17th at noon. If you have any questions or concerns about this outage, please feel free to call the Help Desk @ 713-853-1555 Option #1

Generate a subject line.

OUT: Scheduled Envision System Outage
IN: This is an email
FYI, I have attached the list of accomplishments for your review. I have given you little more than you have asked. Any questions, please let me know. Thanks. Kimat

What is the subject?

OUT:
Accomplishments