Subject: "Have fun!".

Body: Sorry I can't wish you well in person but I have a severe case of laryngitis!. Fortunately, I'm on antibiotics but the doctor said "Don't speak for 3 days. I wish my wife would get laryngitis." Maybe the desert air in Arizona would bring relief. I love saguros (is that right?) Daddy thought planning for Chanukah was a great idea. Also, tell Daddy that if he used e-mail I could talk to him even when I have laryngitis. Love, Sas

Subject: "CE World Call for Content".

Body: KLAY@ENRON.COM Invited CE World authors, Many of you have heard by now that ASCE is hosting the 1st Virtual World Congress for Civil Engineering, CE World (www.ceworld.org). The call-for-content was issued earlier this summer and the deadline for submission was September 27, 2001. Although this deadline has passed, we are still accepting contributions. Go to "Submit Abstracts" on the CE World web site. As Content Area Manager for the Geo-Technology area, I invite you to visit their website to find out more and to submit a contribution. Most content is expected to be in the form of papers, although you are challenged to "think outside the box" by including other forms of media. Remember this is a virtual conference-you do not need to attend; you visit the Congress from the web. This is a good opportunity to show case your work without having to travel to present it.

Subject: "Questar".

Body: As per our discussion, I have done the following to fix the issues with Questar data: - dumped data from 02/04/2001 -> present, for all cycles - fixed the transform component to pull the proper column for utilized capacity and also to assign the correct effective date for each value - re-transformed and re-loaded ALL cycle 5 data (from the *htm files we have) Now, in loading the 86 or so days back into the DB, approx. 3603 PRIMARY KEY violations were logged...this means that they are duplicating point data within the same day, same cycle, etc. If this data could be examined more closely in the reports that are subsequently generated, we can make sure that things are truly copacetic from our side (a "surface" scan of the *.htm files shows that they are indeed duplicating points, usually with different names...the utilized capacity associated with these points is the same though, so this doesn't appear to be a big issue, except for the fact that we will continue to have primary key violations being logged). As always, any questions, just ask. Thanks,

Subject: "CNG Appalachian production".

Body:
The CES/CEM CNG Appalachian production is still flowing into the CES/CEM gathering and transmission contracts. Unless someone objects I would like to get this moved over to Enron's pool. We don't need to have the gathering and transmission contracts moved over. Comments/questions?