input question: On other questions as well, U.S. officials use fatalism and objective language to minimize American responsibility and rule out options. If this premise is true, does that tell us:"US officials choose their wording carefully."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: yes

Question:
Based on the premise "One of the reasons they cited was defeatism about alcoholism management.", can we conclude that "People cannot accept defeat when it comes to management of alcoholism."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
no

Question: Sentence A: These employees make up cross-functional teams that provide an appropriate mix of business expertise and IT skills to accomplish the various tasks of a project.

Sentence B: These employees are worthless and have no real skills.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question: yeah right yeah well do you know something because i have always played classical music
I have never in my life listened to a single piece of classical music.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Problem: Here is a premise:
As under the existing provision, compliance with Title IV does not affect, except as expressly provided, the application of other requirements of the Clean Air Act.

Here is a hypothesis:
Every single provision in the title affects the requirements to the clean air act.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question:
Law brokered a deal with the French government, giving him a 25-year charter to develop the Louisiana Territory.

Does it follow that "Law had a deal with the Spanish to colonize Louisiana. "?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
no