Categorize the comment on the basis of severe toxicity. If the comment is severely toxic output Yes, otherwise output No.

Example Input: The passage of SB 21 signaled, it's back to business as usual.
Example Output: No

Example Input: Again, even if Sanders supporters do a write-in campaign (and I would be stunned if Sanders were OK with that), I don't think that it would have a noticeable effect of the number of votes Clinton gets in the general at all. But this is pure speculation on both our parts.

I've truly enjoyed this discussion by the way! Thank you.
Example Output: No

Example Input: CDC stands for Center for Disease Control.

That is already their job. If there is one thing we do not need it is another governmental agency. If the CDC actually needs money, it can be authorized, passed and signed by the President in days, if not hours. The 'Ebola' money is leftover money authorized but not spent because that crisis was smaller than anticipated. Spending that money first on Zika makes sense. Leaving it there to support a bunch of bureaucrats is what the Selective Service System (Military Draft) does. That's stupid, too.
Example Output:
Yes