QUESTION: Premise: "A mad boy who has a bowl on his head."
Hypothesis: "The happy boy is singing."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?

Let's solve it slowly: The boy can't be both happy and mad at the same time.
The answer is no.

[QUESTION] Can we conclude from "A dog chasing livestock on sand." that "The bvoy was dressed as a cowboy."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
A dog chasing livestock does not imply a bvoy dressed as a cowboy.
The answer is yes.

Q: Can we conclude from "A man in a red shirt and brown shorts and a black cap is sitting near a river with a fishing rod in the water." that "A man is fishing for salmon with a fishing rod at the river."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
A: A man could sit without a fishing rod even if he is not fishing for salmon. There are other types of fish besides salmon.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

QUESTION: Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "A man with a camera wearing a blue shirt and jeans stands between two tall buildings."
Hypothesis: "A man is near two buildings."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell

Let's solve it slowly: Sentence 1 states that a man is between two tall buildings so therefore it would make sense that sentence 2 follows because he is near both buildings.
The answer is yes.

[QUESTION] Given the sentence "A man with a backpack and hat is standing by a high cliff where you can see for miles." is it true that "A man hiked up a mountain to stand and observe the view."?
It is never stated the man hiked to get to the high cliff.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

Q: Given the sentence "Nine men wearing tuxedos sing." is it true that "Men wearing tuxedos sing."?
A:
Men wearing tuxedos sing is less descriptive way of saying that nine men wearing tuxedos sing.
The answer is yes.