Question: Sentence A: The elegant Renaissance style lends an unaccustomed sophistication to the nightmarish superstitions of medieval Brittany incorporated in the sculpture.

Sentence B: The sculpture contains Renaissance and medeival influences.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Question: It is not foolish to consider intent, hence the distinction between murder and accident and serious dieting.
To consider intent is unwise.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Problem: Here is a premise:
Magnetism seemed to radiate from him.

Here is a hypothesis:
He had no great appeal and never seemed to gather anyone's attention.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Sentence 1: In 2000 it was still undergoing a massive expansion.

Sentence 2: It was still growing rapidly back in 2000.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: yes

Question:
The New York Times reported that HMOs, rationing, and other medical-insurance nightmares conjured up in 1994 by enemies of the Clinton health-care plan are coming to pass anyway.

Does it follow that "Rationing, HMOs, and other medical-insurance nightmares conjured up in 1994 by enemies of the Clinton health-care plan are coming to pass anyway, as reported by The New York Times."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
yes

Question:
Based on the premise "On its way, it clipped a shiny skyscraper; I had to wince.", can we conclude that "I watched as the object flew clear over the skyscraper with plenty of room."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
no