Categorize the comment on the basis of severe toxicity. If the comment is severely toxic output Yes, otherwise output No.

Ex Input:
Yeah, I see Russia, like a drunk and dangerous snow machiner buzzing Iditarod mushers. Very tRUMP & cRUSE like of you, Mr. Putin.

Ex Output:
Yes

Ex Input:
How is she not responsible? She is just as guilty in fact he probably couldn't have done it without her. This is sick. We as Alaskan should take a serious look into the court system, I just I just don't know what to say... Prayers to the victims.

Ex Output:
No

Ex Input:
Thanks for that insight--I had heard something similar from a mutual friend of mine and (trooper) Gabe Rich.

Would it have been possible for Arvin to get his son's attention if their attention had been focused on a VPSO trying to shoot Nathaniel? Probably not. I think it highly likely that either Nathaniel Kangas or Mark Haglin would have been dead had VPSO Haglin been armed. But then again, most people haven't lived in countries where the police go unarmed, as I have, so the concept of unarmed cops must just seem totally foreign. Understandable. My argument that guns are a necessary part of life seemed just as foreign to them.

Ex Output:
No