QUESTION: HR confirmed that Stephanie is still interested and has not been hired by anyone else. Please let me know if you feel we should contact her for purposes of indicating to her our interest in her and obtaining salary information from her. Carol
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: Stephanie Panus
Richard: In the US we have changed our swap agreement forms to provide for arbitration in order to avoid having to explain the intricacies of derivatives trading to judges or, God forbid, juries. In Canada we are continuing to submit to the jurisdiction of Canadian courts (on the theory that there are no juries in civil actions and arbitration is rarely used in Canadian contracts generally). As we are presently in the process of revising our UK swap agreement forms, I guess it's time to revisit the issue as it applies to UK agreements. Currently we agree to UK law and the jurisdiction of UK courts (where there are no juries in civil actions). Should this continue to be our policy or should we begin going for arbitration in the UK contracts also? I would ask Paul and Scott to let Richard and me know if arbitration is widely enough used in UK agreements that we can get away with asking for it. Thanks,
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: UK Courts vs. Arbitration for UK Swap Agreements
Houston Attendees: Please convene in Conference Room 791 for the meeting to discuss ETS Risk Management Activities. This videoconference is scheduled for Monday, October 1, 1:00 - 3:00 p.m. If you have not yet responded to the meeting invitation (sent on September 19), please do so at your earliest convenience. Please let me know if you have any questions or require additional information. Thanks, everyone.
Answer: Meeting Location in Houston
Here is an email: I reviewed the latest draft of AA's management rep. letter and caught a few innaccuracies in the way AA described the deal. I attach a revised draft of the letter, with a redline version to highlight for you the changes I think we need to make to keep it accurate. First, AA only listed two of the four agreements that comprise the deal. They apparently forgot that we had created a second SBA. Additionally, at Transcanada's request, we put the transaction fee into a separate letter agreement this year. You will recall that last year, Sempra wanted the transaction fee put right in the SBA. Second, AA's bullet no. 4, as originally drafted, states that Northern does not intend to enter into an option to purchase any base gas during the term of the agreement. That statement is confusing given that Article VI.B of the Monthly Pack Agreement includes an account balance cash out mechanism that is a form of purchase option. That cash out mechanism was in Kent's bullets describing the deal and has been in every draft of the documents that AA looked at, so I assume they are OK with the mechanism and were just inartful in drafting bullet no. 4. My simple fix was to leave AA's language alone but to add an "except for" reference at the beginning of bullet no. 4. Third, AA's draft of bullet nos. 5 and 6 includes the somewhat ambiguous references to "other agreements" and "additional agreements" respectively. Since AA's list of the agreements in the intro paragraph was incomplete, these references in bullet nos. 5 and 6 were also innacurate. Now that I have made the list of agreements in the intro paragraph complete, I've clarified the bullets by adding the "other than those agreements referenced above" language to both bullets. The couple of other changes in bullet 5 simply clarify the meaning. Finally, I've modified the signature blocks per conversation with Bill to delete MKM and myself. I am certainly willing and able to sign this letter, but MKM is not up to speed on the deal and has not reviewed the agreements. Getting her up to speed enough to sign the letter would take some time. Additionally, Bill's thought was that MKM and I are his direct reports anyway, so it doesn't serve much purpose to have the subordinates sign if the top guy has signed. Please give me a call if you have any questions or want to discuss these matters.
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: Mgt. Rep. Letter
Q: Attached is PIRA's extended Daily Demand Report. Please contact Morris Greenberg and Victoria Watkins for more information regarding these reports at [mailto:morris@pira.com] and [mailto:vwatkins@pira.com], respectively. For distribution requests, contact John Graziano at [mailto:jgraziano@pira.com]. We can all be reached at (212) 686-6808. - ed042501.pdf - ed042501.xls
Propose a subject line
A: PIRA's Daily Demand Forecast 04/25/01
Here is an email: Apologies for the SPAM, but kind of fun send out one final one to everyone! New contact info: Email: mellis@alumni.haas.org or mm_ellis@yahoo.com Website: www.geocities.com/mm_ellis Happy holidays and see you guys in May! Cheers,
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A:
SPAM: Contact info and website