In this task, you are given text for US Congressional and California state bills, your task is to generate a summary for this bill.

Ex Input:
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ''Secret Service Protective Privilege
Act of 1999''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS AND PURPOSES.

(a) Findings.--Congress makes the following findings:
(1) The physical safety of the Nation's top elected
officials is a public good of transcendent importance.
(2) By virtue of the critical importance of the Office of
the President, the President and those in direct line of the
Presidency are subject to unique and mortal jeopardy--jeopardy
that in turn threatens profound disruption to our system of
representative government and to the security and future of the
Nation.
(3) The physical safety of visiting heads of foreign states
and foreign governments is also a matter of paramount
importance. The assassination of such a person while on
American soil could have calamitous consequences for our
foreign relations and national security.
(4) Given these grave concerns, Congress has provided for
the Secret Service to protect the President and those in direct
line of the Presidency, and has directed that these officials
may not waive such protection. Congress has also provided for
the Secret Service to protect visiting heads of foreign states
and foreign governments.
(5) The protective strategy of the Secret Service depends
critically on the ability of its personnel to maintain close
and unremitting physical proximity to the protectee.
(6) Secret Service personnel must remain at the side of the
protectee on occasions of confidential conversations and, as a
result, may overhear top secret discussions, diplomatic
exchanges, sensitive conversations, and matters of personal
privacy.
(7) The necessary level of proximity can be maintained only
in an atmosphere of complete trust and confidence between the
protectee and his or her protectors.
(8) If a protectee has reason to doubt the confidentiality
of actions or conversations taken in sight or hearing of Secret
Service personnel, the protectee may seek to push the
protective envelope away or undermine it to the point at which
it could no longer be fully effective.
(9) The possibility that Secret Service personnel might be
compelled to testify against their protectees could induce
foreign nations to refuse Secret Service protection in future
state visits, making it impossible for the Secret Service to
fulfill its important statutory mission of protecting the life
and safety of foreign dignitaries.
(10) A privilege protecting information acquired by Secret
Service personnel while performing their protective function in
physical proximity to a protectee will preserve the security of
the protectee by lessening the incentive of the protectee to
distance Secret Service personnel in situations in which there
is some risk to the safety of the protectee.
(11) Recognition of a protective function privilege for the
President and those in direct line of the Presidency, and for
visiting heads of foreign states and foreign governments, will
promote sufficiently important interests to outweigh the need
for probative evidence.
(12) Because Secret Service personnel retain law
enforcement responsibility even while engaged in their
protective function, the privilege must be subject to a crime/
treason exception.
(b) Purposes.--The purposes of this Act are--
(1) to facilitate the relationship of trust and confidence
between Secret Service personnel and certain protected
officials that is essential to the ability of the Secret
Service to protect these officials, and the Nation, from the
risk of assassination; and
(2) to ensure that Secret Service personnel are not
precluded from testifying in a criminal investigation or
prosecution about unlawful activity committed within their view
or hearing.

SEC. 3. ESTABLISHMENT OF PROTECTIVE FUNCTION PRIVILEGE.

(a) Admissibility of Information Acquired by Secret Service
Personnel While Performing Their Protective Function.--Chapter 203 of
title 18, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section
3056 the following:
''Sec. 3056A. Testimony by Secret Service personnel; protective
function privilege
''(a) Definitions.--In this section:
''(1) Protectee.--The term 'protectee' means--
''(A) the President;
''(B) the Vice President (or other officer next in
the order of succession to the Office of President);
''(C) the President-elect;
''(D) the Vice President-elect; and
''(E) visiting heads of foreign states or foreign
governments who, at the time and place concerned, are
being provided protection by the United States Secret
Service.
''(2) Secret service personnel.--The term 'Secret Service
personnel' means any officer or agent of the United States
Secret Service.
''(b) General Rule of Privilege.--Subject to subsection (c),
testimony by Secret Service personnel or former Secret Service
personnel regarding information affecting a protectee that was acquired
during the performance of a protective function in physical proximity
to the protectee shall not be received in evidence or otherwise
disclosed in any trial, hearing, or other proceeding in or before any
court, grand jury, department, officer, agency, regulatory body, or
other authority of the United States, a State, or a political
subdivision thereof.
''(c) Exceptions.--There is no privilege under this section--
''(1) with respect to information that, at the time the
information was acquired by Secret Service personnel, was
sufficient to provide reasonable grounds to believe that a
crime had been, was being, or would be committed; or
''(2) if the privilege is waived by the protectee or the
legal representative of a protectee or deceased protectee.
''(d) Concurrent Privileges.--The proximity of Secret Service
personnel to a protectee engaged in a privileged communication with
another shall not, by itself, defeat an otherwise valid claim of
privilege.''.
(b) Technical and Conforming Amendment.--The analysis for chapter
203 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by inserting after the
item relating to section 3056 the following:

''3056A. Testimony by Secret Service personnel; protective function
privilege.''.

SEC. 4. APPLICATION.

This Act and the amendments made by this Act shall apply to any
proceeding commenced on or after the date of enactment of this Act.

Ex Output:
Secret Service Protective Privilege Act of 1999 - Amends the Federal criminal code to prohibit testimony by Secret Service personnel or former personnel regarding information affecting a protectee (defined as the President, Vice President, and specified other officials) that was acquired during the performance of a protective function in physical proximity to the protectee from being received in evidence or otherwise disclosed in any proceeding in or before any court, grand jury, department, officer, agency, regulatory body, or other authority of the United States, a State, or a political subdivision thereof.
Makes exceptions: (1) with respect to information that, at the time it was acquired by Secret Service personnel, was sufficient to provide reasonable grounds to believe that a crime had been, was being, or would be committed; or (2) if the privilege is waived by the protectee or the legal representative of a protectee or deceased protectee.
Specifies that the proximity of Secret Service personnel to a protectee engaged in a privileged communication with another shall not, by itself, defeat an otherwise valid claim of privilege.

Ex Input:
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ''Digital Trade Act of 2013''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS; SENSE OF CONGRESS.

(a) Findings.--Congress makes the following findings:
(1) The Internet has become an unprecedented medium for
competition, trade, free expression, and access to information.
(2) The Internet is a driver of the global economy and must
remain open, stable, and secure.
(3) Trade in Internet-enabled services and transfers of
data and other digital information have become increasingly
critical drivers of the economic growth of the United States.
The United States International Trade Commission found in a
July 2013 report, entitled ''Digital Trade in the U.S. and
Global Economies, Part 1'', that ''U.S. exports of digitally
enabled services (one measure of international digital trade)
grew from $282.1 billion in 2007 to $356.1 billion in 2011,
with exports exceeding imports every year''.
(4) The United States is the global leader in Internet-
enabled platforms, networks, and services. Certain liability
protections for those entities under the law of the United
States, which promote innovation and creativity and allow for
cooperative efforts to address harmful activity, have been
critical to the growth of the Internet economy in the United
States.
(5) According to McKinsey & Company, more than /4\ of the
value added by the Internet is in traditional industries.
(6) Internet-enabled commerce and digital trade benefits
small- and medium-size enterprises by providing unparalleled
access to global markets.
(7) Proposals have been put forward by some trading
partners of the United States to restrict the flow of lawful
information across borders. Those proposals would cause
increased government control over the Internet and could create
a fragmented Internet.
(8) Localization barriers to trade are frequently used to
protect, favor, or stimulate domestic industries at the expense
of industries in other countries. Those localization
requirements harm the competitiveness of and end-users in the
United States.
(9) Restrictive policies regarding the flow of information
across borders are nontariff barriers that are harmful to
innovation and economic advancement. Those policies impede
trade in digital products and services and constrain the
ability of United States companies from many sectors to
effectively operate across borders.
(10) Cross-border data flows are critical to manufacturers,
institutions of higher education, hospitals, retailers,
financial services firms, laboratories, and many other
organizations that use the Internet to improve their
productivity and manage global networks of customers,
suppliers, researchers, and employees.
(11) The free flow of information across borders provides
choices and reduces costs to consumers worldwide.
(12) The position of the United States Government has been
and is to advocate for the free flow of information across
borders.
(b) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that--
(1) agencies in the executive branch, including the Office
of the United States Trade Representative, should be staffed
with experts and leaders to fulfill the mission of promoting an
open, global Internet that facilitates commerce and digital
trade; and
(2) private sector stakeholders should have the opportunity
to formally inform efforts of agencies in the executive branch
related to digital trade.

SEC. 3. NEGOTIATING PRINCIPLES FOR INTERNET-ENABLED COMMERCE AND
DIGITAL TRADE.

It shall be a negotiating principle of the United States in
negotiations for a bilateral, plurilateral, or multilateral agreement,
and in multi-stakeholder fora, to seek the inclusion of binding and
enforceable provisions that promote and enhance Internet-enabled
commerce and digital trade, including provisions--
(1) preventing or eliminating barriers to the movement of
electronic information across borders, including by encouraging
interoperability of data protection regimes and eliminating
barriers to accessing, processing, transferring, or storing
information;
(2) ensuring transparency in measures affecting the free
flow of information within and across borders;
(3) continuing the current practice of not imposing customs
duties on electronic transmissions;
(4) prohibiting measures that condition market access or
other commercial benefits on localization of data,
infrastructure, or investment;
(5) prohibiting any country from imposing measures that
require an entity to use computing infrastructure or services
in that country or otherwise require an entity to access,
process, transfer, or store data in the territory of that
country;
(6) ensuring that the Internet continues to operate within
the successful multi-stakeholder governance model;
(7) ensuring that provisions affecting intermediary
liability for Internet-enabled platforms, networks, and
services are consistent with the law of the United States;
(8) ensuring digital trade policies contemplate various
business activities across all industrial sectors and allow for
future technological advancement; and
(9) otherwise eliminating discriminatory treatment of
Internet-enabled commerce and digital trade.

Ex Output:
Digital Trade Act of 2013 - Expresses the sense of Congress that: (1) executive branch agencies, including the Office of the United States Trade Representative, should be staffed with experts and leaders to promote an open, global Internet that facilitates commerce and digital trade; and (2) private sector stakeholders should have the opportunity to inform executive agency efforts related to digital trade. States that it shall be a U.S. negotiating principle in negotiations for a bilateral, plurilateral, or multilateral agreement, and in multi-stakeholder fora, to seek the inclusion of binding provisions that promote and enhance Internet-enabled commerce and digital trade.

Ex Input:
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ''International Financial Institution
Reform and Authorization Act of 1997''.

SEC. 2. INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION.

The International Development Association Act (22 U.S.C. 284 et
seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following:

''SEC. 22. ELEVENTH REPLENISHMENT.

''(a) In General.--The United States Governor is hereby authorized
to agree on behalf of the United States to pay to the Association
$1,600,000,000 for the eleventh replenishment of the resources of the
Association, subject to obtaining the necessary appropriations.
''(b) Limitations on Authorization of Appropriations.--In order to
pay for the United States contribution provided for in subsection (a),
there are authorized to be appropriated, without fiscal year
limitation, $1,600,000,000 for payment by the Secretary of the
Treasury.''.

SEC. 3. ASIAN DEVELOPMENT BANK.

The Asian Development Bank Act (22 U.S.C. 285 et seq.) is amended
by adding at the end the following:

''SEC. 31. ADDITIONAL CONTRIBUTION TO SPECIAL FUNDS; AUTHORIZATION OF
APPROPRIATIONS.

''(a) The United States Governor of the Bank is authorized to
contribute on behalf of the United States $400,000,000 to the Asian
Development Fund, a special fund of the Bank; except that any
commitment to make such contributions shall be made subject to
obtaining the necessary appropriations.
''(b) In order to pay for the United States contribution provided
for in subsection (a), there are authorized to be appropriated, without
fiscal year limitation, $400,000,000 for payment by the Secretary of
the Treasury.''.

SEC. 4. EUROPEAN BANK FOR RECONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT.

The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development Act, section
562(c) of Public Law 101-513 (22 U.S.C. 209l et seq.), is amended by
adding at the end the following:
''(12) Participation in a general capital increase.--
''(A) Participation in a capital increase.--The
United States participation in a general capital
increase of the Bank under Chapter II, Article 4(3) of
the Agreement, is hereby authorized.
''(B) Increase in the united states capital
subscription.--The United States Governor of the Bank
is authorized to subscribe on behalf of the United
States to 100,000 additional shares of the capital
stock of the Bank as part of a general capital
increase, subject to obtaining the necessary
appropriations.
''(C) Limitation on authorization of
appropriations.--To pay for the increase in the United
States capital subscription as provided in subparagraph
(B), there are hereby authorized to be appropriated,
without fiscal year limitation, $1,270,100,000 for
payment by the Secretary of the Treasury.''.

SEC. 5. INTER-AMERICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK.

The Inter-American Development Bank Act (22 U.S.C. 283 et seq.) is
amended by adding at the end the following:

''SEC. 39. CAPITAL INCREASE; SUBSCRIPTION AND CONTRIBUTION AUTHORITY.

''For payment by the Secretary of the Treasury for the United
States capital subscription as part of the eighth general increase in
the authorized capital stock of the Bank, there are authorized to be
appropriated, without fiscal year limitation--
''(1) $76,832,001, for payment for paid-in shares of the
Bank; and
''(2) $4,511,156,729, for payment for callable shares of
the Bank.''.

SEC. 6. INTEREST SUBSIDY ACCOUNT OF THE SUCCESSOR TO THE ENHANCED
STRUCTURAL ADJUSTMENT FACILITY OF THE INTERNATIONAL
MONETARY FUND.

The Bretton Woods Agreements Act (22 U.S.C. 286 et seq.) is amended
by adding at the end the following:

''SEC. 61. CONTRIBUTION TO THE INTEREST SUBSIDY ACCOUNT OF THE
SUCCESSOR TO THE ENHANCED STRUCTURAL ADJUSTMENT FACILITY
OF THE INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND.

''(a) Contribution Authorized.--
''(1) In general.--Subject to paragraph (2), the United
States Governor of the Fund may contribute $75,000,000 to the
Interest Subsidy Account of the successor to the Enhanced
Structural Adjustment Facility of the Fund on behalf of the
United States.
''(2) Condition.--The contribution authorized in paragraph
(1) shall be effective only to such extent or in such amounts
as are provided in advance in appropriations Acts.
''(b) Limitation on Authorization of Appropriations.--To pay for
the contribution authorized in subsection (a), there are authorized to
be appropriated not to exceed $75,000,000, without fiscal year
limitation, for payment by the Secretary of the Treasury.''.

SEC. 7. NEW ARRANGEMENTS TO BORROW FROM THE INTERNATIONAL MONETARY
FUND.

Section 17 of the Bretton Woods Agreements Act (22 U.S.C. 286e-2 et
seq.) is amended--
(1) in subsection (a)--
(A) by striking ''and February 24, 1983'' and
inserting ''February 24, 1983, and January 27, 1997'';
and
(B) by striking ''4,250,000,000'' and inserting
''6,712,000,000'';
(2) in subsection (b), by striking ''4,250,000,000'' and
inserting ''6,712,000,000''; and
(3) in subsection (d)--
(A) by inserting ''or the Decision of January 27,
1997,'' after ''February 24, 1983,''; and
(B) by inserting ''or the New Arrangements to
Borrow, as applicable'' before the period at the end.

Ex Output:
International Financial Institution Reform and Authorization Act of 1997 - Amends the International Development Association Act to authorize appropriations, without fiscal year limitation, for the U.S. contribution to the 11th replenishment of the resources of the International Development Association.
Amends the Asian Development Bank Act to authorize the U.S. Governor of the Asian Development Bank to contribute on behalf of the United States a specified amount to the Asian Development Fund. Authorizes appropriations.
Amends the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development Act to authorize the U.S. Governor of the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development to subscribe on behalf of the United States to specified additional shares of the Bank's capital stock. Authorizes appropriations without fiscal year limitation.
Amends the Inter-American Development Bank Act to authorize appropriations, without fiscal year limitation, for the U.S. capital subscription to the eighth general increase in the authorized capital stock of the Inter-American Development Bank.
Amends the Bretton Woods Agreements Act to authorize the U.S. Governor of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) to contribute on behalf of the United States a specified amount to the Interest Subsidy Account of the successor to the Enhanced Structural Adjustment Facility of the IMF. Authorizes appropriations without fiscal year limitation.
Increases: (1) the amount of loans (equivalent to Special Drawing Rights) the Secretary of the Treasury is authorized to make to the IMF; and (2) the authorization of appropriations for such loans.