TASK DEFINITION: In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence can be inferred from the statement. Incorrect choices change the meaning in important ways or have details that are not mentioned in the statement. Indicate your answer as 1,2, or 3 corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.
PROBLEM: Statement: And it is impossible to see how this difference from Rust has any bearing upon the First Amendment question, which, to repeat, is whether the funding scheme is 'manipulated' to have a 'coercive effect' on those who do not hold the subsidized position. Choices: 1. It is not possible to see how this difference from Rust has any bearing on the First Amendment question. 2. The difference from Rust on the First Amendment question is very noticeable. 3. The question that was asked it really rather very subjective.

SOLUTION: 1

PROBLEM: Statement: He considered, and then snapped his fingers. Choices: 1. He quietly turned down the offer without even thinking about it. 2. He made some noise with his fingers after he thought about it. 3. He was considering an offer to take a new position with the hospital in Denver.

SOLUTION: 2

PROBLEM: Statement: The other example is Chaconne , starring Suzanne Farrell and Peter Martins. Choices: 1. Chaconne is a movie that has Suzanne Farrell and Peter Martins in it. 2. Chaconne is not an example. 3. Chaconne is considered so great because of Farrell and Martins' work.

SOLUTION:
1