In this task, you're given a pair of sentences, sentence 1 and sentence 2. Your job is to determine if the two sentences clearly agree/disagree with each other, or if this can't be determined. Indicate your answer as yes or no respectively.

[EX Q]: Sentence 1: The rugged peak of Arthur's Seat, 251 m (823 ft) in height, can be reached by footpaths all around its base. Sentence 2: There are numerous footpaths to reach the peak of Arthur's Seat.
[EX A]: yes

[EX Q]: Sentence 1: oh i'm sure personalities always come into play uh just in this size of organization Sentence 2: Personalities can be pushed aside and out of the way.
[EX A]: yes

[EX Q]: Sentence 1: In Newsweek , for example, Stuart Taylor Jr. spends an entire column proposing and defending a better question than the media have asked Bush so Would you seek long prison terms for today's 18-year-olds for doing what you say you may or may not have done as a young man--and when you now suggest that whatever you did was a mere youthful indiscretion, and thus irrelevant to your candidacy? Sentence 2: In regards to Bush's candidacy, some magazines are questioning Bush on his prison policies based on his own youthful experiences.
[EX A]:
yes