Question: Sentence A: malicious acts committed with the organization's computer or network resources Avoid a hostile workplace atmosphere that may impair employee performance

Sentence B: Employee performance can be impaired by a hostile workplace atmosphere.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Question: As long as we're talking about corruption and exploitation, we should not forget that the wickedest gambling sharpies don't live in Las Vegas but in the state capitals, where the lotteries are headquartered.
The headquarters was in Las Vegas because it was more economical to put it there than Los Angeles.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Problem: Here is a premise:
yeah well like they say like nobody can get enough you know it's like

Here is a hypothesis:
You can eventually get enough.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Sentence 1: 'All right,' I nodded, starting to walk away.

Sentence 2: I started walking faster because I wanted to leave that place.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question:
I suppose it would do no harm to walk toward the hill.

Does it follow that "The hill looks peaceful."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
it is not possible to tell

Question:
Based on the premise "Theme analysis also can proceed in matrix fashion.", can we conclude that "Theme analysis in matrix fashion is out dated but still viable. "? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
it is not possible to tell