Sentence 1: The public is denied this access because the state, in thrall to the ideology of individualism, refuses either to interfere with speech bullies--such as pornographers--who silence women, or to subsidize the speech of the unorthodox, such as Robert Mapplethorpe.

Sentence 2: The state has always challenged speech bullies, placing that above individualism.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: no

Question:
This fortified town perched high on its hill works a sober charm among the buff-stone 13th-century edifices of its Piazza dei Priori and adjacent Piazza San Giovanni.

Does it follow that "The town is fortified and in a hill."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
yes

Q: If you would have but, can we say that "You definitely didn't."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A: no

Premise:
"The orrery was housed temporarily in the reconstituted hall of the Satheri in the capital city."
Hypothesis: The orrey was to be permanently kept in the rebuilt hall of the Satheri.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

no

input question: so far it's uh doing fairly well uh we're in the metropolitan Washington area and uh i guess most of the area is still living off the federal government with uh beltway bandit type contracts uh our company is uh done fairly well If this premise is true, does that tell us:"There is always plenty of work."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: it is not possible to tell

Q: If A second solution would be to use these other methods first., can we say that "There is only one method that could solve this problem."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A:
no