TASK DEFINITION: In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence can be inferred from the statement. Incorrect choices change the meaning in important ways or have details that are not mentioned in the statement. Indicate your answer as 1,2, or 3 corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.
PROBLEM: Statement: That's a good sentence, quite a literary flavour about it." Choices: 1. That sentence should go in the book. 2. That a nice statement, well written. 3. That a terrible sentence, nothing good about it.

SOLUTION: 2

PROBLEM: Statement: According to the Rochester team, the findings suggest that our language-learning abilities may have to do with our general cognitive prowess, not with any particular language module. Choices: 1. There's a language module that aids us in our ability to learn a new language. 2. The team at Rochester doesn't have any ideas concerning the basis of learning new languages. 3. A person's general intelligence may be related to the ability to learn a new language according to the team from Rochester.

SOLUTION: 3

PROBLEM: Statement: The severability question here is, essentially, whether, without the restriction that the Court today invalidates, the permission for conducting welfare litigation would have been accorded. Choices: 1. Welfare litigation will be affected by the Court's decision. 2. Welfare litigation is expected to increase ten-fold. 3. The Court's decision will not have an impact on welfare litigation.

SOLUTION:
1