Here is an email: David: I will try to call you before I leave work today to follow up with any questions you may have with respect to the following items: (1) I am having the Representative Agreement executed by ENA and will return an original to your attention. Shari suggested that Susan Musch initial the agreement and Susan is out until May 22. (2) The ENA/Aquila weather deal has not been finalized ONLY because I have been waiting to actually view the Floating Price source materials which our traders have never been able to produce or cite a reference to (so that I could view). There is no problem with the deal. (3) As a policy matter for Enron Australia Finance Pty. Limited, do you always agree to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of New South Wales as opposed to arbitration? I am negotiating the ENA/ABN AMRO (Australian branch) futures agreement and am trying to determine appropriate jurisdiction. (4) ENA is attempting to draft an ISDA Master Agreement with a company incorporated in New Guinea (which may have a US office). I don't know a darn thing about New Guinea law. Do you happen to know if we've ever dealt in New Guinea, any lawyers located in New Guinea, what law is used (I guess New Guinea!) or whether it's similar to other PacRim countries? I'll speak with you later. Regards. Sara
What is a potential subject line for this email?
Australian matters