We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control) into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Ex Input:
Sent1: Now when you rightfully talk about how the 2nd amendment grants me the right to own a gun people won't take you seriously because you think the 2nd amendment cannot be repealed.
Sent2: Which would be worthless because you could just repeal that amendment and then repeal the 2nd.

Ex Output:
Not similar

Ex Input:
Sent1: Also if both points are true, would you sacrifice you right to protect your rights with guns (rather than politically) for a crime rate low enough where you don't feel you need a gun for protection?
Sent2: It is just a case of prevention, remove guns being so easily accessible and you then decrease the gun crime and remove the need for guns to defend yourself.

Ex Output:
Not similar

Ex Input:
Sent1: You can't just claim "Country A has more gun control and a lower homicide rate than Country B does" and leave it at that.
Sent2: My point was that the theory that more gun control leaves people defenseless does not explain the lower murder rates in other developed nations.

Ex Output:
Similar