We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty) into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Example Input: Sent1: So your argument is that if the death penalty was cheaper than life in prison it would have the advantage of being cheaper than life in prison.
Sent2: And no one said that life in prision is "much worse" then the death penalty.
Example Output: Not similar

Example Input: Sent1: As far as the deterrent argument, I have said this before, and I will say it again: There is no accurate way to measure if the death penalty is deterring crime or not.
Sent2: I am pro-death penalty even though I conceed that every study I have seen suggests it does absolutely nothing to deter capitol crimes.
Example Output: Similar

Example Input: Sent1: The death penalty is simply a legally imposed punishment given to felons who commited crimes for which the death penalty is applicable.
Sent2: You may think of it as an arbitrary tit-for-tat policy, but I see it as a legal, court ordered punishment handed down by our judicial system for a crime to which the death penalty is applicable.
Example Output:
Similar