In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: toxic and non-toxic. Toxicity is defiend as anything that is rude, disrespectful, or unreasonable that would make someone want to leave a converation.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: It's too bad Jesus didn't just straight up say "don't be an asshole" in those exact words, because that would probably help keep guys like this from acting like assholes.

Output: Toxic

Input: Consider Input: Comment: No she should not. Don't be stupid.

Output: Toxic

Input: Consider Input: Comment: You quote percentages as if Democrats will continue to lose with no mention of how this happened; no mention that the last census/vote got too many districts gerrymandered and thus the reason for the percentages. Yes, it will take increased Democratic turnout and increased backlash against the Republican Party to change this dynamic. But, with exceptions (all voting is local; all politics is local), predict that we will see another swing to Democrats in 2018 - a BIG TENT approach and process is warranted. And yes, that means Democrats who support legal abortion while at the same time pushing legislation to address why abortion happens - funding for healthcare; anti-poverty measures, housing, childcare; etc. Why can't a pro-life Democrat from Pennsylvania be able to operate in a party that has a representative from California that only support measures that make abortion legal and rare?
Output: Non-toxic