In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence can be inferred from the statement. Incorrect choices change the meaning in important ways or have details that are not mentioned in the statement. Indicate your answer as 1,2, or 3 corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

[EX Q]: Statement: The result is a Hindu temple on a grand scale which can be easily compared with its the many temples of Mahabalipuram , built some 50 years before in the southern region. Choices: 1. This Hindu temple is as large and grand as those built in the south, 50 years earlier. 2. The grandness of this Hindu temple sets it apart from the temples of Mahabalipuram. 3. This Hindu temple has similarities to the temples of Mahabalipuram.
[EX A]: 3

[EX Q]: Statement: 'But honestly, how did you think this was going to end?' Choices: 1. Be honest and tell me how you thought it'd end? 2. How did you think the marriage was going to end? 3. Lie to me and tell me how you thought it would end.
[EX A]: 1

[EX Q]: Statement: In fiscal year 2000, GAO officials testified 263 times before 104 different House and Senate Committees and Subcommittees, more than half of all congressional committees and subcommittees. Choices: 1. GOA officials seldom testify before the US House of Representatives or the US Senate. 2. More than half of all congressional committees and subcommittees testimony came from GOA officials. GAO officials testified 263 times before the House and Senate in the fiscal year of 2000. 3. The testimonies delivered to the House and Senate committees and sub-committees by the GOA were conducted by the same officials.
[EX A]:
2