Transwestern's average deliveries to California were 1071 MMBtu/d (98%), with San Juan lateral throughput at 867 MMBtu/d. Total East deliveries averaged 339 MMBtu/d. El Paso's average deliveries to California were 2178 MMBtu/d (76%): - PG&ETop, capacity of 1140 MMBtu/d, deliveries of 726 MMBtu/d (64%) - SoCalEhr, capacity 1216 MMBtu/d, deliveries of 1039 MMBtu/d (85%) - SoCalTop, capacity 528 MMBtu/d, deliveries of 413 MMBtu/d (78%) Friday's posted Gas Daily prices: SoCal gas, large pkgs 2.125 (+.33) PG&E, large pkgs 2.03 (+.335) TW San Juan n/a TW Permian 1.97 (+.335) Enron Online bases: Nov-Mar Apr-Oct Perm-CA .16 (-.025) .20 (-.04) SJ - CA .24 (-.03) .43 (-.055) SJ-Waha .11 (-.01) .27 (-.01) Perm-Waha .03 (-.005) .04 (-.005)
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: California Capacity Report for Week of 10/1-10/5
Tana: I hope I'm not repeating myself here but Laurel Adams (confirm desk - Hickerson) and Sheila Glover (Hickerson CFO) need access. If it's been provided already, my apologies for asking again. Thanks. Sara
Answer: Lotus Notes Access
Here is an email: We are 7 MW long all hours at Montana System, which is our buy from MPC, deal number 615780.1 The upstream is PSEI-DUKE-WWP-MPCO. We put in a false schedule to Smurfit to get flat preschedule, and that tag is 23795. When we get close to HE 0100 on Monday, that Tag needs to go away, and the energy needs to be sold. Please don't say it was a false preschedule, just say that it was 'unexpectedly ramped down' or something. Enpower accurately reflects the length at Montana System Cara
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: We have length at Colstrip all hours on Monday, June 4
Q: I am still working on this audit and I have found in Legal's Financial Lotus Notes tracking system that Morgan Stanley Capital Group Inc., created by Lisa Wheeler on 2/23/97, the status says "Draft Sent". It should be changed to "Executed" since there is an executed copy of their Master Energy Price Swap Agreement in Livelink. This particular Morgan Stanley's Contract number is 95000191, CP #9409. Let me know if you have any questions.
Propose a subject line
A: MORGAN STANLEY CAPITAL GROUP INC.
IN: Harry, Iris and Brandon: Just finished up another call with my counterparty at Dominion. Here are the opportunities: 1. GridSouth - (They really want to dump in "CP&L East" - anything we can do to facilitate this will better meet customer requirements. Capacity: 2003 - 100MW 2004 - 250MW 2005 - 570MW for five years Will accept day-ahead dispatch. Really want 8 hour minimum runs w/ 5x16 availability. Heat Rate: 7200 VOM $2/MWh 2. Entergy - They want a straight 7x24, 365-day power purchase @ fixed price. Capacity: 65MW Start Date: July 2002 Term: 5 Years Price: $x/MWh 3. TVA - Peaker Really want intra-day call w/4hr notice for 4hr minimum run time. Capacity: Tell me what, if any, we can do. Start Date: June 2004 Availability: 5x16 June-Aug; Dec-Mar Heat Rate: 10,900 VOM: $2/MWh Let's really try to see if we can do the intra-day. If absolutely not available for 4hr min run time, see if we can do 8hr min. If this is absolutely not possible, let's try to quote day-ahead 8hr min at the very least. 4. TVA - Combined Cycle This one we already quoted at $3.97/KW-mo for 4-year, 5x16 call, beginning 1/1/03 for 7,000 Heat Rate; $2 VOM. This was for day-ahead, 16hr min run time. Tell me how much the price changes if we reduce min run time from 16hrs to 8hrs. Please call me in NY @ 212-715-5953 to discuss, if you have any questions. Thanks for all your work. I think we have a real opportunity here, if we can respond positively on a few fronts. Regards, Greg

Generate a subject line.

OUT: Dominion Opportunities
IN: This is an email
Berco Resources Inc, K#96000645, CP ID #26557. The Counterparty system indicates that this counterparty was suspended on 3/15/01. Cheryl Johnson's (Counterparty Group) comments state: "Spoke to Bill Bergner who states that he has sent documentation to legal regarding the conversion. He said they did business under a group of different entities other than "Inc." In Jan. '99, they combined those entities to form the LLC, so it wasn't a simple conversion per se. He also stated that this entity should be deleted (inactivated), as there will be no business conducted in that name. This record will be suspended pending inactivation." Does anyone in legal know anything about this because we do have an active contract in the contract system? This is part of the contract audit I've been working on. Thanks, - g

What is the subject?

OUT:
BERCO RESOURCES INC.