In this task, you will be shown a prompt from a judicial decision and multiple holding statements derived from citations following text in a legal decision. Holdings represent the governing legal rule when the law is applied to a particular set of facts. There are five answer choices for each citing text. The correct answer is the holding statement that corresponds to the citing text. You should write an incorrect option. Even though there exist multiple wrong answers, we only need a single wrong answer. There is a <HOLDING> token in the position of the citing text prompt where the holding statement was extracted.

Assembly amended the statute in 2015. See Ga. L. 2015, pp. 1050, 1051, 1. 24 Haas v. State, 146 Ga. App. 729, 732 (5) (247 SE2d 507) (1978) (citation omitted). 25 See Alexander v. State, 294 Ga. 345, 348 (3) (751 SE2d 408) (2013). 26 Marryott v. State, 263 Ga.App. 65, 69 (5) (587 SE2d 217) (2003) (citation and punctuation omitted). 27 See Marryott, 263 Ga. App. at 69 (5) (a jury charge must be adjusted to the evidence presented). 28 See State v. Alvarez, 299 Ga. 213, 214-215 (1) (790 SE2d 66) (2016) (The Court affirmed the grant of a new trial based on plain error in the court's failure to give a requested jury instruction on the defendant's sole defense, justification, which was supported by evidence at trial.). 29 See Brown v. State, 289 Ga. 259, 260-261 (2) (710 SE2d 751) (2011) (<HOLDING>). 30 Notably, Reid does not contend that any
Holding statements: (A) holding that error from the erroneous admission of evidence was harmless in light of the overwhelming evidence of the defendants guilt (B) holding that any error in admission of demonstrative aid was harmless because evidence of defendants guilt was overwhelming (C) holdingthat because the evidence of the defendants guilt was overwhelming the courts failure to give a requested charge on impeachment constituted harmless error (D) holding the error harmless in light of the overwhelming evidence of guilt (E) holding improperly admitted evidence was harmless error given the overwhelming evidence of guilt
holding that error from the erroneous admission of evidence was harmless in light of the overwhelming evidence of the defendants guilt