In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

[Q]: Comment: Accuse another country of wmd's won't work. Damn social media and educated people. The bane of conservative rule
[A]: Obscene

[Q]: Comment: Victimitis,
The point is, all humans are liars, and they lie most when lying suits their interests. That's why, in all instances, regardless of gender, we must regard the claims of an individual as suspect, when those claims serve their interests and/or objectives such as custody of children etc.
[A]: Non-obscene

[Q]: Comment: "Lance said Antifa actions "need not be violent confrontation, but most Antifa, in practice, are willing to physically resist fascist marches and defend themselves against fascist attack.""

Is that what ANTIFA were doing at the inauguration when they torched cars and broke windows and threw bricks at cops?

Is that what ANTIFA were doing in Berkeley when they torched buildings and broke windows and threw bricks at cops?

ANTIFA stands with jihadis. They stand with BLM and BDS. ANTIFA are a terror group and need to be destroyed.
[A]:
Non-obscene