Q: Robert, I changed the volumes on the CES buy/sale deals 204462 and 204471. I just entered a volume for the last day of the month. You don't need to do this right away, when you get a chance go into Unify for Feb and show an actual volume of 0 for the 25th - 28th and a volume of 991014 for the 28th. Then retrack and balance. Jeff, I will include these deals on my manual billing worksheet to you. You should be able to apply the payments to these deals.
Propose a subject line
A: CES Gas Daily for Feb
IN: Following is a status of RAC initiated audits in 2001 and year-to-date cash recoveries related to the Merchant Investment Portfolio: Oil & Gas Joint Venture Audits Completed: Program Operator Gross Claims Net Claims Vastar BP Amoco $177,432 $ 88,716 Hughes-Rawls EPL $285,176 $129,954 E. Sour Lake Adobe $285,126 $256,613 Total $747,734 $475,283 Oil & Gas Joint Venture Audits Scheduled: Program Operator Date Cypress Meridian Resources 10/01 Juniper Bois D'Arc Resources 10/01 Vastar Key Production Co. 12/01 Coal Venture Audits Completed: Program Operator Gross Claims Net Claims Jupiter Cline $ 66,250 $ 66,250 Jupiter Cline $126,000 $126,000 Total $192,250 $192,250 DPR Cline The audit determined that, contrary to the agreement; excess funds were transferred to an investment account in Chris Cline's name rather than DPR. Potentially $5.5 million was at risk to Enron. The situation has been corrected. Cash recovered in 2001 from Audits as of 9/30/01: Oil & Gas - 2000 $315,579 Oil & Gas - 2001 $ 43,913 Coal $ 66,250 Total $425,742

Generate a subject line.

OUT: Status of Audits & Cash Recoveries
IN: This is an email
Beta Brothers: OK, I'm doing a little bragging here. But check out this attachment -- review of my new book in The Daily Oklahoman. By the way, the world premiere party is August 24 here in OKC. More details to follow. Be here or pledge Fiji.

What is the subject?

OUT: [smu-betas] It's not braggin' if...
QUESTION: Judge says Enron has to give up documents By Emily Bazar Bee Capitol Bureau (Published Sept. 7, 2001) Enron Corp. must turn over sensitive internal documents to state legislators, a Sacramento judge ruled Thursday, but only after the two sides agree to a court-approved confidentiality agreement. For months, a special Senate committee investigating electricity price manipulation has been issuing subpoenas and gathering documents from power generators and marketers. During the process, the committee has found three companies in contempt for resisting the subpoenas, including Enron, which fought back with a lawsuit asking the court to intervene on its behalf. In his ruling stemming from the suit, Sacramento Superior Court Judge Charles Kobayashi said he wasn't convinced that "the Senate committee will be able to maintain the petitioner's right to confidentiality." As a result, he ruled, those documents handed over by Enron that contain legitimate trade secrets must be protected by a confidentiality agreement. In his ruling on another Enron motion, however, he denied the company's request to quash the committee's subpoena. Still, Enron officials considered the judge's findings on the whole a victory. "We had no certainty that anything we handed over to the Senate would remain confidential," said Enron spokeswoman Karen Denne. "We were not receiving due process from Senator (Joe) Dunn's committee. They were acting as judge and jury on this issue." Dunn, D-Santa Ana, who is the committee chairman, said he "respectfully disagrees" with the judge's decision on the confidentiality agreement, which he said will be reviewed in the next few days by the Legislature's lawyers to determine whether an appeal should be pursued. Another Enron motion seeking an injunction against the committee will be heard in court next week. Enron is one of three companies that have been found in contempt by the committee. However, the committee purged its contempt finding against Mirant in July after the company complied with the committee's requests. The committee was poised to expunge its contempt finding against Reliant Energy Inc. on Thursday as well but couldn't draw enough senators for a vote. Dunn delayed the action until the next meeting. As for the contempt charge facing Enron, the Senate Rules Committee is scheduled to review the findings Monday and possibly make a recommendation to the full Senate. Should the full Senate also find Enron in contempt, it would determine what punishments, if any, would be levied. Dunn said he believes fines would be the most appropriate punishment.
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: CA Energy Issues
I thought it may be helpful to review my notes on information needed to respond to the Botchlett/Straub charges (although I know you have notes on the information needed). We need: 1. The name, title, description of job function (e.g. had crude oil trading portfolio) and ages of all persons reporting directly to Wade Doshier and John Nowlan for the period 1/1/99 to 6/1/01 and what happened to them in the organization (e.g. still there, transferred, terminated) including dates. For each person if they had established P&L goals in each year what they were and how well they did against the goal. 2. The P&L for Botchlett on his own books (as opposed to his team result) for both 1999 and 2000. 3. The organization charts for the group managed by Doshier then Shankman back to 1995 if available. 4. Data on Straub's actual presence in the building from security. ++++++CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE+++++ The information in this email may be confidential and/or privileged. This email is intended to be reviewed by only the individual or organization named above. If you are not the intended recipient or an authorized representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination or copying of this email and its attachments, if any, or the information contained herein is prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by return email and delete this email from your system. Thank You
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: Botchlett/Straub
I inadvertently gave notice of the Meeting for May 5th, which is Friday. The correct date is the 4th on Thursday, at 2:00 p.m. 38C2. Sorry for the confusion. Dp
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer:
Large Physical Contracts