Categorize the comment on the basis of toxicity. If the comment is toxic (harmful, malicious, derogatory, threat, insult, identity attck, etc.) output Yes, otherwise output No.

[EX Q]: I wouldn't want this laughing jackass in my city.
[EX A]: Yes

[EX Q]: fascism
faSHizm/Submit
noun
an authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization.
synonyms: authoritarianism, totalitarianism, dictatorship, despotism, autocracy; More
(in general use) extreme right-wing, authoritarian, or intolerant views or practice.
Larry you clearly have let your feelings get in the way of facts. The definition of Fascism literally has the word "right Wing in it. If you have no clue what a word means you probably should not debate what it means.
Your age has nothing to do with the conversation anyways.
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: Here's the rebuttal: Krugman is a player for the democrats political establishment to believe otherwise is foolishness. When the RG as with many liberal newspapers don't want to appear as the lone ranger they run a Krugman kind of column. His column isn't about Trump, it's all about getting Hillary elected. Like most democrats you don't see it anymore then the next tool. The Clintons are among the top 1%, the insider political establishment and they intend to stay there no matter what or who they use. Independents like myself see it plainly for it is, a few Master Gardeners the 1% [the Clintons] have a shed full of foolish tools willing to be used. It all boils down to Forrest Gump's story.... "stupid is as stupid does". The really question is: So what does Hillary's moral and mental character have to offer the nation I know the answer do you?
[EX A]:
Yes