The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.

Q: Context:
Utterance: 'Hi, I'm hoping we can come to a nice deal. 🙂 I'm most interested in firewood, because it always helps to have extra if your fire goes out.'

A: No
****
Q: Context: 'So in order to fully enjoy my on this trip while surviving, I will require mass quantities of food.' 'k i need food as first priority' 'Unacceptable'
Utterance: 'why'

A: No
****
Q: Context: 'if u had hungry means what will u do. u need food. right. hehehe' 'I'm willing to give more food to you in exchange for more water since not everybody in my group eats a lot. How about this: I take 2 waters, 1 food, 1 firewood and you can get everything else?' 'ok i accept ur thoughts.sharing is good habit'
Utterance: 'Perfect 🙂 I think that sounds like a good deal for both of us!'

A:
No
****