I know we have not been treating storage correctly in Sitara. I would like to disscuss the best way to handle the CES storage. It involves several pipelines. Who should I talk to? On some storage contracts, ENA will buy the gas from CES on withdrawals and sell the gas to CES on injections. On other storage contracts, CES will give ENA a predetermined injection schedule. However, ENA will make the acutal injection and withdrawal decisions. Which means, what we bill CES will be different from what actually happens. I know this is what we did with BUG, I just don't know how to do it. Who do I need to meet with to discuss CES storage?
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: CES Storage
I think we need to get scheduling, volume management, and accounting together somehow. I don't think a happy hour would do it because people tend to get in their groups and talk. Let me know what you guys think. I would like to talk to Bob Hall and Bob Supperty about this,.
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: Team building
Guys, I had an interview with a reporter from the Economist yesterday. He is doing a big story on business changes, online changes, Jeff Skilling and Enron. Coal came up a lot and i described my enthusiasm for our coal business and our growth. He wants to put some focus on the coal business and i need some facts to get back to him. What percentage of our coal transactions or business is online? Speed changes on a typical transaction post and pre online? Other changes you see or products to develop International effects Total coal moved (physical and financial) especially online Other competing exchanges and why ours is better Other proEnron facts that illustrate our growing business especially as it relates to paradigm changes or online changes Please feed me this info and if there is something specific that you don't want me to say let me know that too but go ahead and give me the answer. I need this information pretty quickly. Thanks,
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: Coal information
RBowers@nyiso.com writes to the NYISO_TECH_EXCHANGE Discussion List: This notice is to inform Transmission Customers that the September 20, 2001 OATT Schedule 1 residual adjustments are artificially inflated in the first version of the advisory billing statements. A file used in the computation of subzonal loads was not loaded prior to the billing run making it appear as though no load existed in some subzones. This causes all DAM scheduled purchases and bilateral transactions serving load in the affected subzones to be sold back in the Balancing Market. This creates an under-collection which is then recovered from the market through the balancing energy, losses, & congestion residuals . The 20th will be rerun as soon as price corrections and metered MWh values have been reconciled. The NYISO apologizes for any inconvenience caused by this problem. Regards,
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer:
September 20, 2001 Residuals