Problem: Here is a premise:
The ultrapatriotic want an amendment to ban flag-burning (hell, why not just mandate flag-waving?)

Here is a hypothesis:
The amendment is being proposed in the Senate.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Sentence 1: A high priority of the CIO Council is to ensure the implementation of security practices within the Federal government that gain public confidence and protect government services, privacy, and sensitive and national security information.

Sentence 2: The CIO Council ensures that security practices are implemented.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: yes

Question:
Part of India's legacy after several centuries of bureaucracy (don't just blame the British civil service it began long before) is an inordinate respect for the written document and the rubber stamp.

Does it follow that "The British civil service was instrumental in refining Indian bureaucratic procedures."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
it is not possible to tell

Q: If It was at Holyhead., can we say that "Before Holyhead, it was in Brighton."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A: it is not possible to tell

Premise:
"what kind of grass do you have"
Hypothesis: What are the names of the three types of grass you said you have?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

it is not possible to tell

Sentence 1: We have to cross that?I fear so," said Jon.

Sentence 2: Jon thought the river looked too fast to cross.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer:
it is not possible to tell