In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence can be inferred from the statement. Incorrect choices change the meaning in important ways or have details that are not mentioned in the statement. Indicate your answer as 1,2, or 3 corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

Input: Consider Input: Statement: both i think it's it's a matter of both um economics economics has a lot to do with it unfortunately but uh i think a lot of choice has gone into it lately and and most of them or or a lot of women i know would rather Choices: 1. I think that it is true that both are relevant to the situation. 2. It is not at all about economics, and entirely about morality. 3. It is both a matter of economics and morality that are relevant.

Output: 1

Input: Consider Input: Statement: Luckily for Mr. Inglethorp, he had been able to produce an unimpeachable alibi. Choices: 1. Inglethorp invented an excuse that was too good to be true. 2. Inglethorp was a shrewd man, with lying being one of his specialties. 3. The alibi was quickly cracked and disregarded, leaving Inglethorped forked.

Output: 1

Input: Consider Input: Statement: Page predicted that no breakthrough would emerge from Kyoto because Stuart Eisenstat was attending as lead U.S. representative instead of Gore. Choices: 1. Page did no think that Kyoto would succeed due to the U.S. representative. 2. Page did not predict a breakthrough because the U.S. representative was a Republican. 3. Page predicted great success in Kyoto due to the U.S. representative.
Output: 1