In this task, you're given a review from Amazon. Your task is to generate a rating for the product on a scale of 1-5 based on the review. The rating means 1: extremely poor, 2: poor, 3: neutral, 4: good, 5: extremely good.
Example: These are junk! Both bulbs have burned out within a two month period!! I cannot believe that this company can be in business with such poor quality. I have used infrared lights for my ball python for many years now and I get a varied range of months from a bulb, but I have never gone through two bulbs in a matter of two months! I am very disappointed.
Example solution: 1
Example explanation: The user seems very disappointed in the product. Because the bulb they ordered has been burned out earlier than usual. So, he gave 1 star to the review considering it extremely poor

Problem: I got this to use on a Stokke Tripp Trapp tray. This does suction with the extra base after wetting down the tray and area between the base and the bowl. However, if the base/bowl are dragged along the tray, they do lose suction. And my 8 month old was very interested in pulling at the tab on the base so only works with that facing away from him. Suction doesn't last the whole meal so be prepared to press down again. Still, this lets me give yogurt and applesauce more easily with baby led weaning. The bowls and lids nest for easy storage. I almost returned these before I tried wetting things for more suction. These didn't stick well to my wood table, and I wouldn't wet that down so I wouldn't use these on a wood grain.
Solution: 4