TASK DEFINITION: Given a passage with a context and an answer, construct a question on the basis of the information present in the passage. Construct the question in such a way that (i) it is unambiguous, (ii) it is answerable from the passage, (iii) its answer is unique (iv) it answer uses text phrases from the passage. Avoid creating questions that (i) can't be answered correctly without actually understanding the passage and (ii) uses the same words or phrases given in the passage.
PROBLEM: Context: the nutritional content and energy density of foods is related to greater control of appetite, satiety and reducing food intake.', 'the randomized crossover study included 20 healthy women, aged 20 and 30 years with a BMI of 20 to 24.9 kg/m2 and who completed that included 3 day trial comparing 8 hours 130 kcal snacks consumed afternoon: yoghurt with added whey protein (PSL), biscuits and chocolate. Participants consumed a standardized menu; snack was consumed 3 hours after lunch. Perceived hunger and fullness were evaluated during the afternoon until dinner voluntary intake ad libitum. They repeat the same snack 3 times.', 'consumption of yogurt with PSL led to a further reduction of appetite in the afternoon in front of the snack of chocolate and biscuits (p < 0.001). No differences of appetite in the afternoon between chocolate vs cookies but significant difference between yogurt with PSL and other treatments (p < 0.001) were detected. At snack, yogurt there was a significant reduction in caloric intake compared to other snacks (p < 0.001) and a later request for dinner with about 45 minutes apart.
Answer: snacks with less energy density and rich in protein (yogurt with PSL) improve the control of appetite, satiety and reduces food intake in healthy women later.

SOLUTION: Does [ SNACK HIGH WHEY PROTEIN improve THE LEVEL OF SATIETY AND REDUCES APPETITE HEALTHY WOMEN ]?

PROBLEM: Context: The aim of the current study was to test the impact of dentin powder on the antimicrobial efficacy of bioactive glass S53P4 (BAG).', 'BAG was suspended (preincubated) in saline at 37 degrees C for different time periods with or without human dentin powder, hydroxylapatite, or decalcified dentin. Subsequently, Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 29212 cells were added to these suspensions and bacterial recovery measured with and without the use of gentle sonication. Furthermore, survival of bacteria in test and control suspensions was assessed over time. Supernatants of suspensions were analyzed for their element contents using atomic absorption spectrophotometry. The effects of pH, silica, and osmolarity on E faecalis viability were assessed using specifically prepared solutions.', 'BAG preincubated with dentin powder caused a significant (P < .05) decrease in viability compared to pure BAG suspensions. This was not based on adherence of bacteria to solid particles or agglutination of the cells, because sonication did not increase bacterial yields. Hydroxylapatite and decalcified dentin did not increase BAG killing efficacy. The additive effect of BAG + dentin powder was dose dependent, occurred only with solids in suspension, and increased with suspension time. An augmented dissolution of glass components, especially silicon, was measured in BAG + dentin powder compared to pure BAG suspensions or counterparts containing hydroxylapatite or decalcified dentin. High osmolarity per se did not affect E faecalis viability, whereas high pH and silica levels did.
Answer: The observed phenomenon was related to an increased BAG dissolution triggered by dentin powder, causing elevated local pH and silica levels.

SOLUTION: Does dentin enhance the effectiveness of bioactive glass S53P4 against a strain of Enterococcus faecalis?

PROBLEM: Context: The LAP Mentor is a procedural simulator that provides a stepwise training for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. This study addresses its "construct" validity that is present when a simulator is able to discriminate between persons with known differences in performance level on the laparoscopic cholecystectomy in real life.', 'Three groups with different skill levels performed 2 trials of 4 distinct parts of the cholecystectomy procedure (cholecystectomy exercises) and 1 full procedure on the LAP Mentor. Assessment parameters concerning the quantity and the quality of performance were compared between groups using the Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests.', 'The entire research was performed in the Center for Surgical Technologies, Leuven, Belgium.', 'For study purposes, 5 expert abdominal laparoscopists (>100 laparoscopic cholecystectomies performed), 11 surgical residents (10-30 cholecystectomies performed), and 10 novices (minimal laparoscopic experience) were recruited.', 'With regard to the quantity of performance (time needed and number of movements), the experts showed significantly better results compared with the novices in the cholecystectomy exercises. Only in the full procedure, the results of all the parameters (except speed) were significantly different between the 3 groups, with the best results observed for the experts and worst for the novices. With respect to quality of performance, only the parameter "accuracy rate of dissection" in exercise 3 showed significantly better performance by the experts.
Answer: Only the full procedure of the LAP Mentor procedural simulator has enough discriminative power to claim construct validity. However, the lack of quality control, which is indispensible in the evaluation of procedural skills, makes it currently unsuited for the assessment of procedural laparoscopic skills. The role of the simulator in a training context remains to be elucidated.

SOLUTION:
Does assessment of procedural skills using virtual simulation remain a challenge?