IN: This is an email
Michelle, Will you please review the attached and initial if you approve the way it reads? We technically hired Jo Crowder as our first hire, but didn't see the sense in paying the remaining $20K of her $50K retainer fee for someone who is at a Staff level. I've discussed this arrangement with Jane and she is in agreement. (Twanda, do you mind printing this on EGM letterhead for Michelle to initial? I'm happy to come pick it up, or you can send to me at ECN 3678a. Thanks!) Additionally, we would like to extend Jane's contract so she can continue to submit candidates to us. Her original contract ended on September 30th. We'd like to extend it for a six month term beginning October 1st, continuing through March 31st. I've spoken with Jane and she agrees that there will not be an additional retainer fee charged to us by reinstating our contract. (Diane, is this as easy as just running new executable copies of the contract, changing only the dates or would we just create a one page amendment to the existing contract for signature by all parties?). We would like to continue working with them under the same fee structure as though our contract with them never ended (i.e. our next hire will be at a 25% fee). Thanks for your help, ladies! Let me know if there's anything else I can do to assist!

What is the subject?

OUT: Jane Beatty letter & contract
QUESTION: Hope are things in London? I have seen Beth Apollo at two meetings in Texas recently, one in Dallas and one in San Antonio. We have been making the Texas circuit -- not quite as exciting as your travels.
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: Stephanie is coming to Houson!
FYI I made a few additional changes to the draft that went to Bay Gas. I'm having discussions with him in the morning to discuss specifics. mk
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: Bay Gas - Proposed 'Parking Provision" to Compression Service Agreement
Hi Ginger: Rick and I spoke and decided that it would be a good idea to provide UC Berkeley's Graduate School of Public Policy with a small stipend of $2,500 to help underwrite a conference they're sponsoring with the business school on Monday. I'll be participating in the conference. Could you please make the check payable to (the faceless) "UC Regents" and send it to: Heather Cameron Richard and Rhoda Goldman School of Public Policy University of California 2607 Hearst Avenue Berkeley, CA 94720 The school's Federal Taxpayer ID is: 946002123. Thanks very much. If you have any questions, don't hesitate. Best,
Answer: Stipend to UC Berkeley Policy School
Here is an email: Stephanie and I met with Jeff Dasovich in San Fransisco on Friday. Jeff understands that he can play an important/strategic role in assisting ENA West Gas in understanding the regulated issues for Gas... There is no doubt that ENA has spent most of our resources in power ( and for good reason) however we need to re focus energy on gas related structures. To facilitate this effort, Jeff has offered to focus some more of his time and effort on coordinating some of the key commercial issues related to California. Jane and Stephanie need to create a priority list that represents West Gas issues and "Hot Button" or action items. Once created we can work with Jeff on action items. In addition to this immediate need, Jeff will join our conference call's/meetings ( or attend where possible). The next session I have on my calendar is Thurs Sept 5 @ 2:30. I trust this initiative will further enhance an already effective procedure. If there are any questions, let me know. regards,
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: Regulatory Updates - General Updates
QUESTION: Richard: In reviewing our ISDA forms we had the following questions for you with respect to the arbitration and process agent language: 1. Do any changes need to be made to our arbitration language? I have enclosed what we currently use. Also, should we keep in waiver of jury trial even if arbitration is chosen for situations where the award needs to be enforced in court? Is it necessary to have a statement that the award can be enforced in court? 2. We have assumed that there is no need to add our appointment of process agent language if our counterparty is either organized in the US or Canada or maintains a branch or office in the US or Canada. Is this a correct assumption? Enclosed is our process agent language. I look forward to hearing from you. As we discussed last week, we will arrange a time that you can talk generally to our group about arbitration issues and questions. Carol
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS:
ISDA Forms