Q: Premise: "Two professional hockey players skating by each other on the ice."
Hypothesis: "Two hockey players skating by other without their hockey sticks."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A: Hockey players on ice may or may not have their hockey sticks.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

QUESTION: Premise: "A karate kid in midair kicking a black punching bag."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A kid practicing kicks." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Let's solve it slowly: Kicking the punching bag implies that the kid is practicing his kicks.
The answer is yes.

[QUESTION] Premise: "A man in an office is checking information on his laptop."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A man throws his laptop across his office." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Man cannot be checking information on his laptop if he throws it.
The answer is no.

Q: Given the sentence "A man wearing white and black clothes doing a construction project." can we conclude that "A construction worker is placing a piece of lumber."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A: A man doing a construction project is not always a construction workers.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

QUESTION: Given the sentence "A trained police dog sits next to his handler in front of the police van." is it true that "A police dog and his handler are waiting for suspects next to the van."?

Let's solve it slowly: A dog sits next to his handler and may not be waiting for suspects.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

QUESTION: Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "A little boy throws a basketball."
Hypothesis: "The little boy is watching tv."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell

Let's solve it slowly:
The little boy either throws a basketball or is watching tv.
The answer is no.