[QUESTION] Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "Young man wearing a wear jacket is behind a counter in a jewelry store gazing off into the distance."
Hypothesis: "Young man deep in thought at the jewelry store."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
Deep in thought defines what the young man was doing when he was gazing off.
The answer is yes.

Q: Can we conclude from "There are a few firefighters surrounding a firetruck." that "Police and firefighters engaged in a battle for supremacy."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
A: One can not be engaged in a battle and surrounding a firetruck simultaneously.
The answer is no.

QUESTION: Given the sentence "Men in black and blue run in the background as soldier do push ups in the foreground." can we conclude that "There are at least two men."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Let's solve it slowly: There are at least two men because there are men that run.
The answer is yes.

[QUESTION] Given the sentence "Onlookers mouths are agape at a breakdancer in a contorted pose." is it true that "There is a dancer in a pose."?
The dancer in the pose is a simplified description of the contorted breakdancer.
The answer is yes.

Q: Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "A woman looks at a sheet while she waits for transportation."
Hypothesis: "A woman is reading a book in her house."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
A: Looking at a sheet by a woman when wait for transportation does not amount to a free reading of a book in her house.
The answer is no.

[QUESTION] Can we conclude from "A man in a yellow shirt is working with wood." that "A man in yellow is holding a rock."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
Holding is not the same as working. Wood is not the same as rock.
The answer is no.