In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Comment: Right Steve, because the McGuinty, Butts, Wynne's "green" plan is paying off in spades... the Ontario Liberals are a national embarrassment, they have no credibility and their "green" plan has turned out to be an absolute failure. Canadians who actually work for a living understand this, the smug limousine liberals who will be protected by fat golden pensions couldn't care less about rising costs of living and weaker economic competitiveness, it's not going to have any material impact on Wynne's ability to sip daiquiris in Cabo. This new tax will hurt working Canadians with higher living expenses and less economic opportunity.Trudeau operates with a smug sense of unearned entitlement, he lives in a cushioned dream of puff and ignorance. Butts sewered Ontario and now he wants to double down with the same incompetent policies on the rest of Canada.
Non-sexual-explicit

Comment: If you can show me any part of the comment this isn't true to the letter, I'll take it down myself... Peyton is Rich, he IS White, and he's showing his political preferences by golfing with the sitting President.....Just like John Elway, he's showing you who he REALLY is... sorry you don't accept the truth about your hero.... Peyton only believes in color..... the green of money...NOT a racist, a CAPITALIST...
Non-sexual-explicit

Comment: Seriously not one administrator, not one principal, not one superintendent, holy underwear teachers and children blown to bits gentlemen we have to protect our phony baloney jobs we must do something about this IMMEDIATELY. I didn't get a HARRUMPH from the school board, you watch your ass.
Sexual-explicit