Problem: BODY: That power shortage Friday cut us off in the middle of our conversation about the appropriate tax language to use for a confirmation evidencing a trade between Teeside Power Financing Limited and RMT. I have attached the proposed form of confirmation. I have combined in it the usual tax language we have in RMT confirmations along with the language we use in a cross-border trade between a Delaware corporation (usually ECT, now RMT) and company (Teeside Power) located in a treaty country acting exclusively through non-U.S. branches (England). Please let me know if the tax language meets with your approval.
======
A: SUBJECT: RMT Trade

Problem: BODY: Ray, We are working on revising the DASH template in order that it can be readily used for asset divestitures, contract terminations, and amendments to transactions. The new DASH, the template of which should be completed early next week, would be prepared earlier in the process that was typically the case in the past, would contain a RAC recommendation, and would then be used as the approval document for the appropriate committee (Transaction Review or Bankruptcy Management) to recommend or approve a transaction. This is consistent with past practice (although presumably only business unit, RAC, and legal sign-offs would occur prior to committee review) and with your memo of earlier today. Your thoughts as to how the approval process should occur after a DASH is prepared would be appreciated. Regards,
======
A: SUBJECT: Revised DASH

Problem: BODY: Tickets are available for the BEAVERS game tonight against the Oklahoma Redhawks at 6:30pm. First Come, First Served! Please See Theresa Villeggiante in Origination for tickets!
======
A:
SUBJECT: Beavers Baseball!'