Teacher:In this task, you are given a paper review. Based on the review, your job is to identify language and generate "en" if the review is in English or generate "es" if the review is in Spanish. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].
Teacher: Now, understand the problem? Solve this instance: While the overall direction is promising, there are several serious issues with the paper which affect the novelty and validity of the results: 1. Incorrect claims about related work affecting novelty: - This work is not the first to explore a deep learning approach to automatic code completion: "Toward Deep Learning Software Repositories", MSR'15 also uses deep learning for code completion, and is not cited. - "Code Completion with Statistical Language Models", PLDI'14 is cited incorrectly -- it also does code completion with recurrent neural networks. - PHOG is independent of JavaScript -- it does representation learning and has been applied to other languages (e.g., Python, see OOPSLA'16 below). - This submission is not the only one that "can automatically extract features". Some high-precision (cited) baselines do it. - "Structured generative models of natural source code" is an incorrect citation. It is from ICML'14 and has more authors. It is also a log-linear model and conditions on more context than claimed in this submission. 2. Uses a non-comparable prediction task for non-terminal symbols: The type of prediction made here is simpler than the one used in PHOG and state-of-the-art (see OOPSLA'16 paper below) and thus the claimed 11 point improvement is not substantiated. In particular, in JavaScript there are 44 types of nodes. However, a PHOG and OOPSLA'16 predictions considers not only these 44 types, but also whether there are right siblings and children of a node. This is necessary for predicting tree fragments instead of a sequence of nodes. It however makes the prediction harder than the one considered here (it leads to 150+ labels, a >3x increase). 3. Not comparing to state-of-the-art: the state-of-the-art however is not the basic PHOG cited here, but "Probabilistic Model for Code with Decision Trees", (OOPSLA 2016) which appeared before the submission deadline for ICLR'17:
Student:
en