Question:
Based on the premise "GAO has developed a set of strategic goals and objectives that will help to support the Congress in its decisionmaking and improve the performance and accountability of the executive branch.", can we conclude that "GAO's goals will decrease performance and accountability of the executive branch."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
no

Question: Sentence A: Each lives in Gloucester.

Sentence B: They all live in Gloucester.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Question: These standards require that analysts and financial auditors promptly obtain sufficient, competent, and relevant evidence to afford a reasonable basis for any related findings and conclusions.
Our standards do not require analysts or financial auditors to promptly obtain sufficient evidence.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Problem: Here is a premise:
Highly active in excavating and restoring the temples and palaces, Curzon also did more than any of his predecessors, adding 9,000 km (5,500 miles) of new railway lines, working to modernize farming with an agricultural research institute, and building an irrigation system that would become a model for Asia and Africa.

Here is a hypothesis:
Curzon did less than any of the rulers before him, especially in the areas of agriculture, excavation, and railway building.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Sentence 1: But so many of the cases we handle have to do with basic rights and a decent life.

Sentence 2: We handle around fifty cases a year.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Premise:
"Of course that man was Presidential material."
Hypothesis: Bernie would have made an excellent President.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
it is not possible to tell