Question:
Based on the premise "In this case however, the dogma being shattered is based fundamentally on ignorance.", can we conclude that "The dogma is from dogs."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
no

Question: Sentence A: you know yeah i yeah i agree with you there too

Sentence B: I somewhat agree with you on that sentence.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question: During the reign of his son, under a regent, the borders were pushed further north and west, provoking reactions from the Tibetans and Chinese as well as the British East India Company, the power to the south.
The borders were pushed further west and north under the reign of his song, under a regent, and that provoked reactions from the Tibetans and Chinese as well as the British East India Company, the power to the south.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Problem: Here is a premise:
There are a planetarium, a City des Enfants for those under 12 years, and the shining stainless steel G??ode sphere containing a revolutionary cinema with a hemispheric screen 36 m (118 ft) in diameter.

Here is a hypothesis:
All children love the City des Enfants exhibit.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Sentence 1: Destroy it before Dave Hanson can complete his magic!" The men behind him yelled.

Sentence 2: The magic of Dave will destroy the man.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Premise:
"the he used to be a a vice in fact he started four of the TI plants"
Hypothesis: He has now retired from his position.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
it is not possible to tell