Problem: So how do I make it better? Well, we provided an affidavit, and that affidavit indicated that we, if called upon to testify, would validate the authenticity of the articles that were written. We did that, in effect, to offer to both sides so that we wouldn't otherwise have to testify. Accepted by the plaintiffs, not accepted by the defendants. Defendants wanted to have the right of cross-examination.

Based on the paragraph above can we conclude that "The affadavit was sent via email"? OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No

A: It's impossible to say

Problem: In response to the third point made by the Honourable Senator Roche, which is about Canada's role in the entire area, the Minister of Foreign Affairs has said there is a three-fold response: securing agreement to an updated five-year action program with new, concrete objectives for disarmament and non-proliferation; seeking a more robust review and assessment process to give full meaning to the principle of permanence with accountability; and promoting universal adherence to the NPT, with renewed commitment by treaty member states to live up to their obligations.

Based on the paragraph above can we conclude that "The Foreign affairs minister indicated that the review process was insufficiently robust"? OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No

A: Yes

Problem: Nejat Saydam (15 September 1929 25 October 2000) was a Turkish film director, screenwriter, and actor from Istanbul. He began as a theatre actor in 1946, then four years later he became an assistant in movies. In 1957, he began directing films. Saydam starred in two Turkish films, and wrote 85 film scripts.

Based on the paragraph above can we conclude that "Nejat Saydam loved movies."? OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No

A:
It's impossible to say