input question: and uh in each case it was a retrial and the sentencing was the same each time which happened in the state of Florida happened to be uh death but in terms of i well the question also was in terms of mandatory sentencing or mandatory sentences for uh certain crimes i think depending on uh in certain crimes i think that they should be mandatory for example uh armed robbery uh if we have convicted i think uh plea bargaining should should be uh a thing of the past um certain types of uh you know homicides If this premise is true, does that tell us:"I don't believe in plea bargaining for homicides and armed robbery. "?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: yes

Question:
Based on the premise "The offal is thrown into the stream.", can we conclude that "The offal is put into the freezer for later use."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
no

Question: Sentence A: yeah that and i think uh putting more emphasis on local handling of the problem i think this is something that that Bush came out and said in his uh in his address uh to the nation at the beginning of the year

Sentence B: Bush made an address to the nation at the beginning of the year

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Question: and i watch the i sometimes watch the the news
Occasionally I watch the news.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Problem: Here is a premise:
That fragmented system without oversight had its deviance (not all doctors provided good care) and cost (the doctors drove up the bills).

Here is a hypothesis:
Since the system was broken, the hospital didn't have good enough care

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question:
yeah i can't afford to go to them

Does it follow that "I have more than enough to pay for the event."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
no