Generate the answer for a given question. The question requires common knowledge of English. Make sure that the answer is in detail, long, consistent with the context, and requires general knowledge of English. To be less repetitive, please vary your language for each question. Give a proper explanation to answer, and if necessary, provide the definition of various terms. And conclude your answer if it's long. If you have used other resources (e.g., Merriam Webster's.) to answer the question, include citations in your answer. You don't need to paraphrase the context of your resources, but make sure that your answer is consistent and complete.

[EX Q]: In Afrikaans, it is considered very disrespectful to use 'you' ( 'jy') when referring to someone who is above the level of a peer. Instead, it is expected that you use 'u', which is a very respectful form of 'you'. Also you can talk in the third person 'How is ma'am today' would be the equivalent. I cringe internally when I say 'How are you' to someone older than me, because in Afrikaans it would be very rude. I was bought up to only ever refer to my parents in the third person. 'how is mom today', 'what is dad doing' when speaking in Afrikaans. The lack of English equivalent feels very wrong and disrespectful. What is the best way to convey this in English? I have been reassured that saying 'you' to a parent isn't rude, and I understand that this can be cultural, but I'm particularly looking for what options English offers in this regard, as far as existing vocabulary, that convey respect. I'm in South Africa.
[EX A]: I think you is the polite form (u). The less polite form is thou (jy), but us Brits, polite as ever, now call everyone by the the polite form and thou fell by the wayside a long time ago. Thou barely ever surfaces in normal English unless you want something to sound historical, but it is still in Holier than thou and used to be (20th century) common in regional dialects from Yorkshire and parts of the Midlands (anyone can feel free to correct my geography). So you shouldn't feel so bad using you it's not the same you (jy) that you think it is.

[EX Q]: This year there were: many more people much more people Alternatively: many fewer people much fewer people Which is considered better English?.
[EX A]: Both much and many can be used, but which is appropriate depends on whether the noun they're referring to is countable or not. With countable nouns, use many more or many fewer: I had many more bananas than Tom. I had many fewer nickels than Alice. With uncountable nouns, use much more or much less How much more fiber does a banana have than an apple? How much less water does this process use?

[EX Q]: Is there any difference between the two? In a technical document I have used a phrase 'this is a temporal solution' and my coworker told that he'd use 'temporary' in the context. Is one of the two more correct than the second?.
[EX A]:
Temporal means 'pertaining to time'. Personally I have not enountered this word in normal speech at all, even in somewhat formal writing. I have only encountered it as a technical term. For example, in grammar, the part of the sentence that specifies the time at which something happened (e.g. 'today' or 'throughout the year') is a temporal adverbial. The word also comes up a lot in science-fiction wherever some made-up technical term pertaining to time (usually time travel) is required, e.g. temporal mechanics. In real science, the term is sometimes used as a complement to spatial (pertaining to space). Temporary is a much more common word. It means 'lasting for a limited time' and is the opposite of permanent. Politicians sometimes qualify their policies as a 'temporary measure' to give the impression that there are plans for them to be repealed in due course (which, of course, never happens, but that's a different matter). Edit: In the specific example in your question, I think you most likely mean 'a solution that isn't permanent', so temporary is definitely what you need. Temporal is wrong unless you are contrasting your solution against one that is spatial or in some other way not relating to time.