In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.

Ex Input:
Comment: I feel exactly the same way. In this case her article is spot on. I had no idea our schools were teaching this racist claptrap. I applaud the lady who had the guts to speak up about, most especially because she is not 'white.'.

Disgusting use of my tax dollars. I have no kids but if I did you can be assured I would be going into the classroom removing my kid while politely denouncing this curriculum as the reverse racism it is. All the while telling the innocent and beautiful children that we are all equal and deserving of respect and should offer compassion for each other.

As for grocery stores, when the demand is there they supply it. I noticed in my city there has been a real uptick in cultural offerings. I think that is great, but I had no idea we were supposed to pander to such nonsense. Why well intentioned dolts always seem to make matters worse is beyond me.

Ex Output:
Agree

Ex Input:
Comment: There is a stunning paragraph, right here:

"As of December 2016, there were 1,612 filled positions, among which 30 per cent were women. That fits with the fact between 2000 and 2015, 31 per cent of applicants for the jobs were from women."

Hello?

Did I read that correctly?

About 30 percent of the applicant professors were women, and about 30 percent of the chosen recipient professors were women?

Um, where's the sexism?

Or wait, is the sexism sitting there in Ottawa in the Office of the Science Minister, a sexism that is so out-of-control and strong-armed that it wants to throw young male researchers under the bus, in an agenda of bigoted gynophilia?

Ex Output:
Agree

Ex Input:
Comment: The lugenpresse would have us believe it is Trump who is adversarial with the lying officials.

But in fact these officials have made unsupported accusations, delayed meeting with Congress and then showed up unprepared to give answers, changed meeting dates with the President-Elected and blamed him, and leaked secrets to media even before they were provided to him. All this in the context of fallaciously questioning the merits of his election victory.

Many heads should roll come Jan 21.

Ex Output:
Disagree