Problem: Here is a premise:
Then you will go with what you have or you will go without us.

Here is a hypothesis:
You will either go with what you have or without us into battle.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Sentence 1: Nash pioneered game theory, became schizophrenic, recovered, then won a Nobel Prize late in life.

Sentence 2: The pioneer of game theory was Nash.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: yes

Question:
The monastery is strictly vegetarian, and visitors are warned not to bring any meat with them.

Does it follow that "If visitors bring meat, they are banned from the monastery. "?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
it is not possible to tell

Q: If The interim rule is promulgated under the authority of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C., can we say that "Promulgation of the interim rule was something expected for a long time."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A: it is not possible to tell

Premise:
"We can't decide whether to tell our friends about the error."
Hypothesis: We're unable to agree if we should tell our friends about the error or not.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

yes

Sentence 1: Prefabrication of absorber modules can reduce the overall construction schedule.

Sentence 2: Prefabricated absorber modules are more expensive.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer:
it is not possible to tell