We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control) into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Example Input: Sent1: We tell them what was meant when the law passed, but even these gun owners do not care what was meant, they only care what the law says!
Sent2: Which passed the law requireing "smart guns", if they ever become available (right now they do not exist).
Example Output: Not similar

Example Input: Sent1: I worry that the reduction of gun ownership will increase crime rates even in households with a gun.
Sent2: That said, the idea that non gun homicides dont increase does not show causation between high gun ownership and increased murder rates.
Example Output: Not similar

Example Input: Sent1: Or the belief that the militia is dependant on citizens being able to be armed as they see fit rather than the ownership of firearms being contingent upon militia service?
Sent2: Especially considering the fact that most of the armed services would likely side with gun owners.
Example Output:
Not similar