In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: As you well know, Shore, because you like me have taken advantage of it, there are no "civil comments" criteria or screening process at the National Post. And when mentally deranged characters like "Claude" ramp up the rhetoric with absolutely disgusting and obscene and unfounded libels about Harper or others, there is a tendency for others including me to shoot back.

Unlike yourself stalking me around multi-forums (an unhealthy obsession if ever there was one and frankly kind of creepy), I don't stalk you around and make copies of your posts. Therefore, I can't entertain the folks here with some of your most outrageous and bogus blather from the far out Liberal side of the political divide.

Tell me, Shore, are you a paid agent of the Liberal Party or an old school chum with a secret crush on Trudeau or simply a pain in the derriere?

Inquiring minds want to know.

OK, on second thought they don't ... you are a nonentity with the shallowness of a birdbath for an anorexic sparrow.

Output: Non-identity-attack

Input: Consider Input: Comment: He was already a registered sex offender. This just put the seal on his need to be on the registry for life.

That being said I don't agree with the sex offender registry. It's a form of double punishment for criminals who have served their time. If they can't trust them to not offend again then don't let them out at all.

Output: Non-identity-attack

Input: Consider Input: Comment: I don't begrudge anyone who makes a good salary in whatever field they work in...even if its much higher than mine. I also sympathize with anyone that looses their job, whether they be a government employee or oil industry worker.

Then there is the comment from the conservative which goes something like: If oil industry workers get laid off then all state workers should have their pay cut or loose their jobs altogether because I hate government employees and want them to suffer. Real classy those conservatives are.

If the conservative thinks government employment is so lucrative, he or she had ample opportunity to obtain one of those "high paying, awesome benefits" jobs. The fact they never did is their problem. Instead the rag-a-colic conservative does the bidding of the 1%ers by attacking other middle class Americans and thus demonstrating they are too ignorant to know who they should be mad at. The result is Donald Trump.
Output: Non-identity-attack