Q: Attached please find the referenced list. Since all the counterparties are amended counterparties, my changes are as follows: 1. Statoil - no change in earlier approvals 2. Texla - I don't think it's a change, but they cannot trade US power, also there is no change for financial, I previously said and we continue not to trade financial. 3. Avista Corporation- Washington Water Power Division. For financial trading for Avista Corporation I previously said no financial trading. I am going to open them up for all financial trading. They can trade under the Avista Corporation name, or they can trade as Avista Corporation, acting through its Washington Water Power Division. For power trading, they can trade all US West power products, but can Enron can only sell to Avista for US East power products. Again, no European power for US counterparties until further notice.
Propose a subject line
A: Counterparty Approval List for 02/09/00
IN: SVMG Energy Committee Members and Electric Infrastructure Team - FYI ************************************ Market Participants: San Francisco Study Group Members and Cal-ISO Market Participants, A meeting of the San Francisco Study Group has been scheduled for Tuesday October 9, 2001. This meeting is being held to discuss both the status of various transmission and generation projects in the San Francisco Area, as well as the initiation of new transmission system studies related to the San Francisco Area. The meeting will be held in Conference room 300 on the third floor of PG&E's 77 Beale Street building in San Francisco. The meeting is scheduled from 10 AM to 3 PM. Lunch will not be provided. The draft meeting agenda is attached. <<Meeting Agenda-Oct9thRev.doc>>

Generate a subject line.

OUT: CAISO NOTICE: San Francisco Study Group Members and Cal-ISO Market Participants
IN: This is an email
Paul, I was wondering if you are getting some LNG industry reports/analysis e.g. "LNG in World Markets" published by Poten & Partners. If yes, would it be convenient for you to arrange a copy of the same for DPC? As I write this mail, the DPC lenders meet is still going on in Singapore. All of us are anxiously waiting to know the outcome. Regards,

What is the subject?

OUT: LNG Industry Reports
QUESTION: Here are the two bills of sale for the Intergen transaction. The only change to the form was the insertion of the date. The CA II bill also reflects the sale of the transformer.
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: CA I and II Bills of Sale
I would like to consider some counterparty-specific agreement to solve this problem. What do you think of a side agreement among both KN entities and Enron which specifies that a user ID and password have been issued to both of KN's legal entities jointly and severally and that transactions for certain products (e.g. all financial products) entered into under that user ID and password will be deemed executed by KN Trading (their financial trading entity) and all others will be deemed executed by KN Marketing (their physical entity)? Do you see any problems here? Issues re: joint & several liability under the ETA but not the Transactions? Let me know if you need further clarification of the problem. I haven't run this by Louise yet - she may raise system or commercial objections. Mark
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: Assignment Issue
Susan, It is my understanding that Enron will not be receiving gas on Destin pipeline in the month of December. Therefore we have made arrangements to sale the gas to another party. If I have misunderstood the situation, please advise. Stevens
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer:
Bazor Ridge Gas Plant