Q: Premise: "A guy doing a wallride on his bike."
Hypothesis: "A guy is fixing his bike."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
A: Either the guy is doing a wallride on his bike or he is fixing said bike. He cannot do both at the same time.
The answer is no.

QUESTION: Premise: "A man with a white shirt standing next to a vending stall."
Hypothesis: "A man standing next to a vending stall."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Let's solve it slowly: With or without a white shirt a man is standing next to a vending stall.
The answer is yes.

[QUESTION] Premise: "A man doing tricks on a bmx bike."
Hypothesis: "The man is holding onto the bike."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
A man is holding his bmx bike whilst doing tricks on it.
The answer is yes.

Q: Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "Race car driver sitting in his race car."
Hypothesis: "A driver sits in his race car."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
A: A driver who sits in his race car is sitting in it.
The answer is yes.

QUESTION: Given the sentence "A woman in a white shirt is wearing blue goggles while speaking to someone with her hands." can we conclude that "A woman is talking with her hands."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Let's solve it slowly: The woman is speaking to someone with her hands shows that she is talking with her hands.
The answer is yes.

QUESTION: Given the sentence "An oddly dressed man gazes from over a pile of junk food." can we conclude that "A gamer is looking at his snacks."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Let's solve it slowly:
Being oddly dressed doesn't necessarily mean the man is a gamer.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.