Katy Marsh is seventy years old now. She stopped working five years ago. Last year she decided to make her dream come true. When she was young, she hoped to travel along a river of Scotland in a small boat. She took her small CD player, her hot water bottle and a bag of books to make her life in the boat wasn't too uncomfortable. We asked her if she was afraid of being on the river for so long. She said, "Well, I'm going to take a good _ . When I'm losing my way during my trip, it can help me a lot. Anyway I'm not afraid of death because I love rivers-I just hope it loves me too. " Katy certainly had lots of energy . In her free time, she enjoyed playing the piano, swimming, hiking, and dancing. She had a wonderful trip in the small boat last year. She is seventy, but she doesn't want to have a quiet and peaceful life. She hopes to have fun in the rest of her life. What are the answers to this following set of questions: 1. Is Katy retired?
2. What age was she when she retired?
3. How many years ago was that?
4. What does she hope to have in the rest of her life?
5. Is she very energetic?
6. What does she do in her free time?
7. What else?
8. Where did she go last year?
9. Did she visit cities?
10. Did she take a trip?
11. How did she travel?
12. What did she take with her?
13. Anything else?
14. Did she take anything to read?
15. Was it just one book?
16. Why did she take books with her?
17. Was she afraid?
18. Does she love rivers?
19. Does she want to have a quiet life?
20. Did she think she would get lost on the trip?
Answer: 1. yes
2. 65
3. five years ago
4. fun
5. yes
6. playing the piano
7. swimming
8. Scotland
9. no
10. yes
11. by boat
12. her small CD player
13. her hot water bottle
14. yes
15. no
16. so she wasn't uncomfortable
17. no
18. yes
19. no
20. yes

Hunting is the practice of killing or trapping any animal, or pursuing or tracking it with the intent of doing so. Hunting wildlife or feral animals is most commonly done by humans for food, recreation, to remove predators which are dangerous to humans or domestic animals, or for trade. In the 2010s, lawful hunting is distinguished from poaching, which is the illegal killing, trapping or capture of the hunted species. The species that are hunted are referred to as game or prey and are usually mammals and birds.

Furthermore, evidence exists that hunting may have been one of the multiple environmental factors leading to extinctions of the holocene megafauna and their replacement by smaller herbivores. North American megafauna extinction was coincidental with the Younger Dryas impact event, possibly making hunting a less critical factor in prehistoric species loss than had been previously thought. However, in other locations such as Australia, humans are thought to have played a very significant role in the extinction of the Australian megafauna that was widespread prior to human occupation. What are the answers to this following set of questions: 1. are megafauna extinct?
2. are poaching and lawful hunting the same?
3. what is poaching?
4. what are prey?
5. are humans usually hunted?
6. what are usually hunted?
7. does hunting involve trapping animals?
8. how many purposes for hunting are listed
9. did humans impact extinction in Australia?
10. what is one purpose of hunting
11. what also happened at time of North American extinction?
12. what were megafauna replaced by?
Answer: 1. yes
2. no
3. the illegal killing, trapping or capture of the hunted species
4. The species that are hunted
5. no
6. mammals and birds.
7. yes
8. Three
9. yes
10. trapping any animal
11. the Younger Dryas impact event,
12. smaller herbivores.

CHAPTER III

After three weeks had elapsed, I determined to make a strong appeal to Erskine to do justice to the memory of Cyril Graham, and to give to the world his marvellous interpretation of the Sonnets--the only interpretation that thoroughly explained the problem. I have not any copy of my letter, I regret to say, nor have I been able to lay my hand upon the original; but I remember that I went over the whole ground, and covered sheets of paper with passionate reiteration of the arguments and proofs that my study had suggested to me. It seemed to me that I was not merely restoring Cyril Graham to his proper place in literary history, but rescuing the honour of Shakespeare himself from the tedious memory of a commonplace intrigue. I put into the letter all my enthusiasm. I put into the letter all my faith.

No sooner, in fact, had I sent it off than a curious reaction came over me. It seemed to me that I had given away my capacity for belief in the Willie Hughes theory of the Sonnets, that something had gone out of me, as it were, and that I was perfectly indifferent to the whole subject. What was it that had happened? It is difficult to say. Perhaps, by finding perfect expression for a passion, I had exhausted the passion itself. Emotional forces, like the forces of physical life, have their positive limitations. Perhaps the mere effort to convert any one to a theory involves some form of renunciation of the power of credence. Perhaps I was simply tired of the whole thing, and, my enthusiasm having burnt out, my reason was left to its own unimpassioned judgment. However it came about, and I cannot pretend to explain it, there was no doubt that Willie Hughes suddenly became to me a mere myth, an idle dream, the boyish fancy of a young man who, like most ardent spirits, was more anxious to convince others than to be himself convinced. What are the answers to this following set of questions: 1. Did the author keep copies of his letter?
2. Has he been able to find the original?
3. Whom was he writing to?
4. For what purpose?
5. Did he put a lot of effort into the writing?
6. How long did he wait before starting to write?
7. What had Cyril interpreted?
8. After sending the letter, did he still feel passionate?
9. Who became a myth to him?
10. Was the author able to narrow down what caused him to lose his interest?
Answer:
1. No
2. No
3. Erskine
4. Restore Cyril Graham to his proper place in literary history
5. Yes
6. three weeks
7. Shakespeare
8. No
9. Willie Hughes
10. It is difficult to say.