input question: And the second point? I asked. If this premise is true, does that tell us:"There was only one point."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: no

Question:
Based on the premise "Agencies may maintain these cumulative balances on biweekly or pay period T ", can we conclude that "The pay period only lasts a few hours to one day."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
it is not possible to tell

Question: Sentence A: 15These fiscal policy simulations do not reflect other federal commitments and responsibilities not fully recognized in the federal budget, including the costs of federal insurance programs, clean-up costs from federal operations resulting in hazardous wastes, and the demand for new investment to modernize deteriorating or obsolete physical infrastructure (e.g.

Sentence B: The fiscal policy simulations don't reflect everything in the budget as some things are constantly changing.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question: Later it became the palace of the Mamelukes and was a British garrison during WWII.
The British did not use this in any of the wars they fought.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Problem: Here is a premise:
I hate the space program.

Here is a hypothesis:
The space program doesn't make sense.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question:
traveling that path with the current 126 petitions and NOx SIP Call believe it will eventually take us to our environmental goal, it has been -- and still is -- a very rocky road for industry, environmentalists, the states, EPA and other stakeholders.

Does it follow that "Many of the stakeholders involved are experiencing turbulence in attempting to meet our environmental goal."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
yes