Given a paragraph about movies and a set of conversational questions and answers about the paragraph, say whether the passage contains sufficient information to answer the follow-up question. Say Yes if it is answerable; otherwise, say No. The paragraph has the prefix 'CONTEXT:'. Each conversation question has a prefix 'Q:' followed by the answer prefix 'A:', and the follow-up question has a prefix 'FOLLOWUP_Q:'.

Example Input: CONTEXT: My guess is that Vinay did not know Anjali before their meeting at the jewelry shop. I infer this from analyzing the character of Vinay. He doesn't appear like someone who will use crooked methods. Also, regarding the sog sequence, I think it was a mere coincidence, intentionally plotted by the director to create mystery. <sep> Q: Does Vinay know Anjali before meeting her at the jewelry shop? A: My guess is that Vinay did not know Anjali before their meeting at the jewelry shop Q: Why do you think that he did not know her? A: I infer this from analyzing the character of Vinay Q: Do yuo think that he was not brazen enough to sek employment knowing the owners daughter was who he was interested in? A: He doesn't appear like someone who will use crooked methods Q: Is it possible that he knew her but played like he did not? A: I think it was a mere coincidence, intentionally plotted by the director to create mystery <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Or was it a mere coincidence that Dav happened to be on the same road as Tanuja?
Example Output: Yes

Example Input: CONTEXT: He didn't have any solid leads to go on. He didn't know where he was being kept before he eavesdropped on Malcolm and he only did that because he was following his mother after she reacted strangely on the news Walter was dead. He only got that news after his last act of cleaning up the neighbourhood got him the clue he needed. If he knew where he was in the first place, he wouldn't of believed the mob guy (saying Walter was dead). <sep> Q: Why didn't Oliver Queen rescue Walter sooner than he did? A: He didn't have any solid leads to go on <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Do you feel he was tentative?
Example Output: No

Example Input: CONTEXT: You didn't miss anything; you just caught something that probably doesn't matter. This never shows up or comes up in any subsequent episodes. I assume it's supposed to be simply George's breath/vapor from exhaling - just not done very well! It's so short that it might also just be a reflection mistake when filming. Incidentally, unless there's a "pilot" episode on the DVDs that I'm not aware of, this scene actually occurs in episode 2. <sep> Q: Why does the werewolf exhale a green mist? A: I assume it's supposed to be simply George's breath/vapor from exhaling - just not done very well Q: Does he exhale the mist in multiple episodes or one time only? A: This never shows up or comes up in any subsequent episodes Q: do you think there is a specific reason it happened in 1 episode only? A: unless there's a "pilot" episode on the DVDs that I'm not aware of, this scene actually occurs in episode 2 <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: DO you think maybe the werewolves just have very bad breath?
Example Output:
Yes