IN: This is an email
Dear Jeff: Just to follow up on my voice-mail message of this morning, please let me know the status of Enron's review of the GISB drafts sent to you on Monday, October 29th? We consider these negotiations a top priority and would like to finalize the GISBs with Enron North America Corp. and Enron Canada Corp. on an expedited basis. Please contact me to discuss. Kind Regards,

What is the subject?

OUT: status of GISB negotiations
QUESTION: Finally we're forging ahead. We plan on publishing our much-delayed and much-changed Aspen special issue in two weeks. We're really excited. We're focusing now on the issue of globalization in the post-September 11 world. All of your contributions in Aspen aided us immensely. The issue is going to be an unusual print-online package. In addition to articles in the magazine that relate in various ways to the Aspen meeting, we will be posting significant additional material online. For those of you who answered our three questions prior to the meeting, we will be publishing all of those--in full--on Fortune.com. But we also want to hear from you
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: The issue nears
Frank, I'm sorry, but disregard the first message I sent. The $234MM value I alluded to is not the value for the one deal booked with a 1993 deal date. This value represents the MTM value for all active deals w/ Sithe. I'm still working to find a deal like your requested. I'll let you know. Thanks,
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: Please Disregard First Message
Whoever wrote question number four clearly has a sense of humor. Will any Enron executives have a role in the combined company's senior management team? Yes, Greg Whalley will serve as Executive Vice President and will join Dynegy's Office of the Chairman when the transaction closes. What happens to Ken Lay? Ken Lay will remain as Chairman and CEO of Enron until the transaction closes. He will not join the Dynegy Office of the Chairman. Will Enron complete its new building? Yes. Is Enron's vision still to be the world's leading company? Enron's vision will be revisited once the companies are merged. Will this affect Enron's innovation? A key strength of Enron and Dynegy has been their employees' innovation and we expect this to continue.
Answer: From the ENE/DYG Q&A on Enron's website
Here is an email: Would YOU like to learn more about a company that has - A product that is virtually UNTAPPED! - Is Still widely UNKNOWN! - A product EVERYONE needs! - A product OVER 80% of Europeans have! - A product UNDER 2% of the US has! - Cost less than a cup of coffee a day! - YOUR comissions are PAID DAILY!!! - And is growing faster than MICROSOFT.... yes MICROSOFT!!! Then send a email for more information and see for YOURSELF! residual26@yahoo.com
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: "ANNOUNCING" a market that is Virtually UNTAPPED!!
QUESTION: As we breifly, ECS is developing a product for gas driven (as opposed to electric driven) horse power. Essentially, the value proposition involves "wrapping" an existing gas horspower station with a Compression Service Agreement and allowing the Pipeline to pay for the shaft horspower in commodities other than (or solely in) cash. ECS provides shaft horsepower (meaning that we bring gas, as opposed to elecricity) to the compressor. Because Shippers would continue to pay for its fuel per the existing tariff, the Pipeline would utilize shipper fuel to pay for shaft horsepower. This structure represents an avenue for the Pipeline to hedge the value of the molecules it collects from Shippers or simply to levelize their fuel burn. Timing and basis differences could, presumably, be included to increase the value to the Pipeline and potentially passed through to the Shippers. Attached is a deal example that I recently presented to Great Lakes Gas Transmission that solves a fuel levelization problem they have on their system....they overcollect in the Winter and undercollect in the Summer. It may be of some use in reviewing to help ascertain answers to the following: 1) Would a gas compression service deal be required to be filed by the FERC? My sence is that the answer is no. This is simply an O&M service contract and lease agreement. 2) If a Pipeline is on an annual gas tracker, what would be the tracker implication? It should be flat, as technically, ECS has not changed the amount of fuel collected/utilized....we have only provided optionality as to hedgeing??? Please give me a call to discuss. Thanks
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS:
Gas on Gas ompression Deal