Question: Sentence A: Stop at the giant granite scarab on the northwest corner of the lake.

Sentence B: You can stop at the northwest corner of the lake.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Question: There is general agreement that the value to an individual of a reduction in mortality risk can vary based on several factors, including the age of the individual, the type of risk, the level of control the individual has over the risk, the individual's attitudes towards risk, and the health status of the individual.
There are several factors, including age, on which the value to someone of a reduction in mortality risk can be based.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Problem: Here is a premise:
Staying at a central base allows excursions both east and west, but a base in the far east or west limits your ability to see the opposite side of the island.

Here is a hypothesis:
Staying at a central base on the island is your best bet to see all there is to see.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Sentence 1: In 1991, faced with rising budget pressures, a growing project inventory, and the need to become more results-oriented, the Corps initiated a comprehensive review of its civil operation and maintenance program.

Sentence 2: In 1991 they faced rising budget pressures.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: yes

Question:
Offending countries must conform with WTO rules, or face harsh sanctions.

Does it follow that "Offenders have to follow FDA's rules."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
no

Question:
Based on the premise "You cannot defend against what I saw.", can we conclude that "What I saw can be easily defended and changed."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
no