As many of you know, the Outlook mail retention rules have been turned on at the mail server, and all user mailboxes now follow these rules: Message Location Maximum Retention Inbox 30 days Sent Items Folder 30 days Trash Rollover from Inbox for one day Folders All eMail messages placed in folders will be destroyed after one calendar year But what if you regularly view your Sent Items folder to see your past communications? Are you stuck to only 30 days now? In the Sent Items folder, YES. But, luckily, we are still allowed a full year on all other mail folders, so we can easily create a new folder to store our sent mail in which will allow us to keep it for a full year. We then create a RULE to automatically move the sent mail to it. Works great! Note: This new folder will be included in your mailbox 100mb size limit! CREATE NEW FOLDER Right-click on the top folder in your folder list and select New Folder Type the name you'd like to give this folder ("Save Sent" for example) Click OK CREATE NEW RULE Close any open messages, calendar items, etc, so just Outlook is open. Click Tools, then Rules Wizard Click New, then select Check messages after sending Click Next Click Next When prompted ......Is this correct?, click Yes Put a check mark next to move a copy to the specified folder Click the word specified in the lower window Select the new folder you created earlier and click OK Click Finish When prompted, This rule is a client-only rule..... click OK Click OK Now, a copy of all messages you send will be in your new folder for reference for a full year. Enjoy!
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: IT Weekly Tip - Save Those Sent Messages
Mark, Zhiyong and I met with Geoff this evening, to run over the budget numbers. Geoff was prepared to give the OK to the following items CGS Physical $ 2,065,308 Sitara/CPR/TDS Maint $ 1,310,853 TAGG/ERMS Maint $ 1,273,775 CGS Financial $ 1,451,316 Gas Performance Upgrades $ 800,000 TOTAL $ 6,901252 Of the the other items in that section, the IT Commerical Co-ordination piece needs to be handled by Tommy Yanowski, the Global Valuation Mtce piece shouldn't be there and has now been corrected in the underlying sheets, and the Gas Fundamentals piece needs to move to Chris Gaskill's pot. Zhiyong and I will meet with Chris Gaskill first thing in the morning to get sign off on the numbers for Gas Fundamentals. We don't anticipate a problem with this as Geoff Storey has already given him a heads-up on the costs. We have also cut around $700k off the Gas Fundamentals costs which didn't make it to the final printout today in the meeting. regards
Answer: ENA Gas Budget Sign Off
Here is an email: Clinton greater than 6 month deals: Contract # 960385052 Deal # 246926 Term: 11/01/00 - 10/31/01 Delivery Point: Columbia Gas Trans- Appalachia pool. Firm ENA sale to Clinton. 15,000 MMBtu/day . Contract # 960385053 Deal # 246931 Term: 11/01/00 - 10/31/01 Delivery Point: Columbia Gas Trans- Appalachia pool. Firm ENA purchase from Clinton. 15,000 MMBtu/day .
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: Clinton Energy Management Services, Inc.
Q: In what I'm sure is an oversight, EEI forgtot to send me a ballot. After appealing for my right to vote, a ballot was forthcoming. I voted "NO" on the proposal. We will see what happens from here.
Propose a subject line
A: EEI - Ballot on Article 2.3
IN: If the last Hoegh Galleon cargo of this year is diverted to Puerto Rico, the economics of sending non-Cabot LNG to Puerto Rico are different than those mentioned in my prior note. Based on current prices, there is $0.7 MM of value that could be captured between Enron LNG and Eco on the diversion. This represents the price difference between what it would cost to buy back our sale to ENA at CMS and what Eco would have had to pay Cabot for a Winter Cargo. If CMS would let us out of the terminal fee or let it apply to a future delivery, that would add an additional $1 MM of value. If Cabot had to give up its Demand Charge and Demand Surcharge (hard to imagine) on the Winter Cargo, that adds another $4.7 MM. A second Hoegh Galleon cargo should add $1.5 MM but would need to be sourced from Nigeria or Algeria(???). Cabot controls the date of the Last Cargo delivered in 2001. It can be November 23-December 15 (unless another date is mutually agreeable). The date of this last delivery determines the earliest date that Eco would be able to receive the Hoegh Galleon. The earliest that Eco could receive the Hoegh Galleon should therefore be between December 20 and January 11 - depends on Cabot. Eco would be able to receive a second Hoegh Galleon cargo as soon as 29 days after the first Hoegh Galleon cargo delivery or as late as 45 days after. Two Hoegh Galleon cargoes should give Eco enough fuel (barely) to get them to the dates where they are eligible to receive the Early Spring cargo (100 days after the Last Cargo of 2001). In addition to the $$$'s available to be captured, this program removes Eco's risk of not receiving a Winter Cargo from Cabot. Economics and Timing - The amount of value to be captured is most heavily influenced by December-January NYMEX prices. These impact our cost to buy back gas at the CMS tailgate and our cost to buy the second Hoegh Galleon cargo. Our gas cost is more subject to change than is the Cabot contract price we are trying to beat. If we had a crystal ball, we would lock-in the economics of the diversion and of the purchase of the second cargo when the NYMEX bottoms-out. The front of the price curve has lost ~$1.00/MMBtu in the last 2 weeks. Where will it go from here? In order to be prepared to execute when market conditions are right, we need to get Eco on board and initiate discussions with a producer about supply for the second cargo. Also, we should talk with Gene Massey to confirm that the contract says what we think it says and to get his thoughts on what we are trying to do. I would appreciate any insights that you may have regarding this opportunity. Regards,

Generate a subject line.

OUT: Update - EcoElectrica Winter Cargo
IN: This is an email
I hope that each one of you will arrange your schedules tomorrow to make the time to vote. Also, please encourage everyone on your staff to take the time to vote tomorrow. For those employees who typically work later hours, please suggest that they take the time to vote before coming to the office. Everyone should feel that they have sufficient time to make their vote count. It should be interesting to watch the returns tomorrow evening. Hopefully, we will have all played a part in the outcome.

What is the subject?

OUT:
Time for Voting