Given the task definition, example input & output, solve the new input case.
In this task, you are given text for US Congressional and California state bills, your task is to generate a summary for this bill.
Example: SECTION 1. LIABILITY OF BUSINESS ENTITIES PROVIDING USE OF FACILITIES
TO NONPROFIT ORGANIZATIONS.

(a) Definitions.--In this section:
(1) Business entity.--The term ''business entity'' means a
firm, corporation, association, partnership, consortium, joint
venture, or other form of enterprise.
(2) Facility.--The term ''facility'' means any real
property, including any building, improvement, or appurtenance.
(3) Gross negligence.--The term ''gross negligence'' means
voluntary and conscious conduct by a person with knowledge (at
the time of the conduct) that the conduct is likely to be
harmful to the health or well-being of another person.
(4) Intentional misconduct.--The term ''intentional
misconduct'' means conduct by a person with knowledge (at the
time of the conduct) that the conduct is harmful to the health
or well-being of another person.
(5) Nonprofit organization.--The term ''nonprofit
organization'' means--
(A) any organization described in section 501(c)(3)
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and exempt from
tax under section 501(a) of such Code; or
(B) any not-for-profit organization organized and
conducted for public benefit and operated primarily for
charitable, civic, educational, religious, welfare, or
health purposes.
(6) State.--The term ''State'' means each of the several
States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto
Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, the Northern
Mariana Islands, any other territory or possession of the
United States, or any political subdivision of any such State,
territory, or possession.
(b) Limitation on Liability.--
(1) In general.--Subject to subsection (c), a business
entity shall not be subject to civil liability relating to any
injury or death occurring at a facility of the business entity
in connection with a use of such facility by a nonprofit
organization if--
(A) the use occurs outside of the scope of business
of the business entity;
(B) such injury or death occurs during a period
that such facility is used by the nonprofit
organization; and
(C) the business entity authorized the use of such
facility by the nonprofit organization.
(2) Application.--This subsection shall apply--
(A) with respect to civil liability under Federal
and State law; and
(B) regardless of whether a nonprofit organization
pays for the use of a facility.
(c) Exception for Liability.--Subsection (b) shall not apply to an
injury or death that results from an act or omission of a business
entity that constitutes gross negligence or intentional misconduct,
including any misconduct that--
(1) constitutes a crime of violence (as that term is
defined in section 16 of title 18, United States Code) or act
of international terrorism (as that term is defined in section
2331 of title 18) for which the defendant has been convicted in
any court;
(2) constitutes a hate crime (as that term is used in the
Hate Crime Statistics Act (28 U.S.C. 534 note));
(3) involves a sexual offense, as defined by applicable
State law, for which the defendant has been convicted in any
court; or
(4) involves misconduct for which the defendant has been
found to have violated a Federal or State civil rights law.
(d) Superseding Provision.--
(1) In general.--Subject to paragraph (2) and subsection
(e), this Act preempts the laws of any State to the extent that
such laws are inconsistent with this Act, except that this Act
shall not preempt any State law that provides additional
protection from liability for a business entity for an injury
or death with respect to which conditions under subparagraphs
(A) through (C) of subsection (b)(1) apply.
(2) Limitation.--Nothing in this Act shall be construed to
supersede any Federal or State health or safety law.
(e) Election of State Regarding Nonapplicability.--This Act shall
not apply to any civil action in a State court against a business
entity in which all parties are citizens of the State if such State
enacts a statute--
(1) citing the authority of this subsection;
(2) declaring the election of such State that this Act
shall not apply to such civil action in the State; and
(3) containing no other provision.
Output: Shields a business entity from civil liability relating to any injury or death occurring at a facility of that entity in connection with a use of such facility by a nonprofit organization if: (1) the use occurs outside the scope of business of the business entity; (2) such injury or death occurs during a period that such facility is used by such organization; and (3) the business entity authorized the use of such facility by the organization.
Makes this Act inapplicable to an injury or death that results from an act or omission of a business entity that constitutes gross negligence or intentional misconduct, including misconduct that: (1) constitutes a hate crime or a crime of violence or act of international terrorism for which the defendant has been convicted in any court; or (2) involves a sexual offense for which the defendant has been convicted in any court or misconduct for which the defendant has been found to have violated a Federal or State civil rights law.
Preempts State laws to the extent that such laws are inconsistent with this Act, except State law that provides additional protection from liability. Specifies that this Act shall not be construed to supersede any Federal or State health or safety law.
Makes this Act inapplicable to any civil action in a State court against a business entity in which all parties are citizens of the State if such State, citing this Act's authority and containing no other provision, enacts a statute declaring the State's election that this Act shall not apply to such action in the State.
This Bill focuses on shielding business entities from civil liability relating to an injury or death depending on the conditions of injury, hence the generated summary is correct.

New input case for you: SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ''Improving Postsecondary Education
Data for Students Act''.

SEC. 2. STUDY ON IMPROVEMENTS TO POSTSECONDARY EDUCATION TRANSPARENCY
AT THE FEDERAL LEVEL.

(a) Formation of Advisory Committee on Improving Postsecondary
Education Data.--
(1) In general.--Not later than 30 days after the date of
enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Education shall convene
the Advisory Committee on Improving Postsecondary Education
Data (in this Act referred to as the ''Advisory Committee''),
which shall be comprised of 15 members who represent
economically, racially, and geographically diverse populations
appointed by the Secretary in consultation with the
Commissioner for Education Statistics, including--
(A) individuals representing different sectors of
institutions of higher education, including individuals
representing undergraduate and graduate education;
(B) experts in the field of higher education
policy;
(C) State officials;
(D) students and other stakeholders from the higher
education community;
(E) representatives from the business community;
(F) experts in choice in consumer markets;
(G) privacy experts;
(H) college and career counselors at secondary
schools;
(I) experts in data policy, collection, and use;
and
(J) experts in labor markets.
(2) Chairperson.--The Secretary shall appoint the
Chairperson of the Advisory Committee.
(b) Study Required.--The Advisory Committee shall conduct a study
examining--
(1) the types of information, including information related
to costs of postsecondary education, sources of financial
assistance (including Federal student loans), student outcomes,
and postgraduation earnings, the Federal Government should
collect and report on institutions of higher education to
assist students and families in their search for an institution
of higher education;
(2) how such information should be collected and reported,
including how to disaggregate information on student outcomes
by subgroups of students, such as full-time students, part-time
students, nontraditional students, first generation college
students, students who are veterans, and Federal Pell Grant
recipients under subpart 1 of part A of title IV of the Higher
Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1070a); and
(3) the ways in which the Federal Government may make such
information more readily available to--
(A) students and their families in a format that is
easily accessible and understandable, and will aid
students and their families in making decisions; and
(B) States, local governments, secondary schools,
individual or groups of institutions of higher
education, and private-sector entities.
(c) Scope of Study.--In conducting the study under this Act, the
Advisory Committee shall, at a minimum, examine--
(1) whether the current Federal transparency initiatives on
postsecondary education--
(A) are reporting consistent information about
individual institutions of higher education across
Federal agencies; and
(B) are similar to transparency initiatives on
postsecondary education carried out by States,
individual or groups of institutions of higher
education, or private-sector entities;
(2) whether--
(A) the collection and reporting of postgraduation
earnings by the Federal Government is feasible, and if
feasible, the options for collecting and reporting such
information;
(B) collecting and reporting such information would
improve the use of Federal transparency initiatives and
ease decisionmaking for students and their families;
and
(C) collecting and reporting such information would
have an impact on student privacy, and if so, how such
impact may be minimized;
(3) whether any other information, including information
relating to student outcomes or identified under the review
required under subsection (d), should be collected and reported
by the Federal Government to improve the utility of such
initiatives for students and their families, and if so, how
such information may be collected and reported, including
whether the information should be disaggregated by subgroups of
students;
(4) whether any information currently collected and
reported by the Federal Government on institutions of higher
education is not useful for students and their families and
should not be so collected and reported;
(5) the manner in which the information from Federal
transparency initiatives is made available to students and
their families, and whether format changes may help the
information become more easily understood and widely utilized
by students and their families;
(6) any activities being carried out by the Federal
Government, States, individual or groups of institutions of
higher education, or private-sector entities to help inform
students and their families of the availability of Federal
transparency initiatives;
(7) the cost to institutions of higher education of
reporting to the Federal Government the information that is
being collected and reported through Federal transparency
initiatives, and how such cost may be minimized; and
(8) the relevant research described in subsection (d).
(d) Review of Relevant Research.--In conducting the study under
this Act, the Advisory Committee shall review and consider--
(1) research and studies, if any, that have been conducted
to determine questions most frequently asked by students and
families to help inform their search for an institution of
higher education;
(2) the types of information students seek before enrolling
in an institution of higher education;
(3) whether the availability to students and their families
of additional information on institutions of higher education
will be beneficial or confusing;
(4) results, if any, that are available from consumer
testing of Federal, State, institution of higher education, and
private-sector transparency initiatives on postsecondary
education that have been made publicly available on or after
the date that is 10 years before the date of enactment of this
Act; and
(5) any gaps in the research, studies, and results
described in paragraphs (1) and (4) relating to the types of
information students seek before enrolling in an institution of
higher education.
(e) Consultation.--
(1) In general.--In conducting the study under this Act,
the Advisory Committee shall--
(A) hold public hearings to consult with parents
and students; and
(B) consult with a broad range of interested
parties in higher education, including appropriate
researchers, representatives of secondary schools
(including college and career counselors) and
institutions of higher education from different sectors
of such institutions (including undergraduate and
graduate education), State administrators, and Federal
officials.
(2) Consultation with the authorizing committees.--The
Advisory Committee shall consult on a regular basis with the
authorizing committees in conducting the study under this Act.
(f) Reports to Authorizing Committees.--
(1) Interim report.--Not later than 180 days after the date
of enactment of this Act, the Advisory Committee shall prepare
and submit to the authorizing committees and the Secretary an
interim report describing the progress made in conducting the
study under this Act and any preliminary findings on the topics
identified under subsection (c).
(2) Final report.--
(A) In general.--Not later than 1 year after the
date of enactment of this Act, the Advisory Committee
shall prepare and submit to the authorizing committees
and the Secretary a final report on the study,
including--
(i) recommendations for legislative,
regulatory, and administrative actions based on
findings related to the topics identified under
subsection (c); and
(ii) a summary of the research described in
subsection (d).
(B) Consultation with NCES.--The Advisory Committee
shall consult with the Commissioner of Education
Statistics prior to making recommendations under
subparagraph (A)(i) with respect to improving the
information being collected and reported by the Federal
Government on institutions of higher education.
(g) Availability of Funds.--The amount necessary to conduct the
study under this Act shall be made available from amounts available to
the Secretary for administrative expenses of the Department of
Education.
(h) Definitions.--For purposes of this Act:
(1) Authorizing committees.--The term ''authorizing
committees'' has the meaning given the term in section 103 of
the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1003).
(2) First generation college student.--The term ''first
generation college student'' has the meaning given the term in
section 402A(h) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C.
1070a-11(h)).
(3) Institution of higher education.--The term
''institution of higher education'' has the meaning given the
term in section 102 of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20
U.S.C. 1002), except that such term does not include
institutions described in subsection (a)(1)(C) of such section
102.
(4) Secondary school.--The term ''secondary school'' has
the meaning given the term in section 9101 of the Elementary
and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 7801).
(5) Secretary.--The term ''Secretary'' means the Secretary
of Education.
(6) State.--The term ''State'' has the meaning given the
term in section 103 of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20
U.S.C. 1003).
(7) Student.--The term ''student'' includes--
(A) a prospective student;
(B) a student enrolled in an institution of higher
education;
(C) a nontraditional student (as defined in section
803(j)(2) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20
U.S.C. 1161c(j)(2))); and
(D) a veteran (as defined in section 480(c)(1) of
such Act (20 U.S.C. 1087vv(c)(1))) who is a student or
prospective student.

Passed the House of Representatives May 22, 2013.

Attest:

KAREN L. HAAS,

Clerk.
Output:
Improving Postsecondary Education Data for Students Act - Directs the Secretary of Education to convene an Advisory Committee on Improving Postsecondary Education Data that: (1) is comprised of 15 members who represent economically, racially, and geographically diverse populations; and (2) includes higher education stakeholders, state officials, business representatives, college and career counselors at secondary schools, and experts in higher education policy, consumer choice, privacy, labor markets, and data policy, collection, and use. Requires the Committee to study: the types of information the federal government should collect and report on institutions of higher education (IHEs) to assist students and families in their search for an IHE, including information related to postsecondary education costs, financial assistance, student outcomes, and postgraduation earnings; how that information should be collected and reported, including how to disaggregate student outcome information by student subgroups; and ways in which the federal government could make that information more readily available to students and their families in an easily accessible and understandable format, and to states, local governments, secondary schools, IHEs, and private-sector entities. Requires the Committee, in conducting the study, to: (1) review relevant research concerning the types of information students and parents seek in searching for an IHE; (2) consider the utility of the information currently reported and whether additional information would be beneficial or confusing; and (3) consult with parents, students, and a broad range of parties interested in higher education. Directs the Committee to submit an interim and final report on the study to Congress and the Secretary. Requires the Committee, after consulting with the Commissioner of Education Statistics, to include in its final report recommendations for legislative, regulatory, and administrative actions to improve the information the federal government collects and reports on IHEs.