A man can't be simultaneously wearing and not wearing a helmet.. So what could be the question?
Question followed by answer: Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "Man standing wile wearing a helmet."
Hypothesis: "The man is riding without a helmet."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
no

A guy is a male person. A man grinding down a green rail is rollerblading.. So what could be the question?
Question followed by answer: Premise: "A male rollerblader wearing a green shirt and hat grinding down a green rail."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A guy in white a green shirt is rollerblading." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
yes

A chef is a different occupation than a server. The person cannot be carrying a tray and cutting carrots at the same time.. So what could be the question?
Question followed by answer: Given the sentence "A server with a whistle in his mouth is carrying a tray of platters up the stairs." is it true that "Chef cuts carrots."?
no

Not all bull fighters are men. Having a bull charge at him man not scare him.. So what could be the question?
Question followed by answer:
Given the sentence "A bull fighter is waving his red cape at the charging bull." is it true that "The man is scared."?
it is not possible to tell