TASK DEFINITION: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.
PROBLEM: Comment: gj53 I'm with you on this one. There are some pretty ignorant people here posting comments. I guess that's why Chrysler/Jeep are still in business because if you like lipstick on pig (Jeep) you can get anyone to buy anything. Proud owner of an 07 FJ 6spd with over 300,000km. Doesn't burn a drop of oil, original diffs, transfer case, tie rod ends, wheel bearings etc......everything works. Please go ask any Jeep owner (if they've even made it to that mileage) what they have had replaced in that time. But please ignore the reliability record of this truck and buy a Jeep. You'll love the garbage power train, weak towing capacity, zero interior room. But you can work on your tan with your top down, listing to your passengers wine about how their backs hurt all the while sticking your leg out the doorless sides.....that is until your ecu fails, or starter, or alternator..........

SOLUTION: Non-identity-attack

PROBLEM: Comment: Mr Dunce is still practicing for Scaramouche's new program "Dancing with the Self-fellators"

SOLUTION: Non-identity-attack

PROBLEM: Comment: Homosexuals see "intrinsically disordered" and see it as applying to them. Not some amorphous "homosexual tendency", but to them as homosexuals.

You are now spouting the tired old "gay sex is icky". If you don't like it, then don't do it.

SOLUTION:
Identity-attack