Here is an email: From Kevin Presto: Attached is the spreadsheet version of the template we discussed this morning. I have added the additional columns everyone requested. I would now like the business unit leads to fill in the blanks such that we have an initial Power Implementation Plan that can be delivered to Louise on Friday. With respect to East Power (I am out Thursday and Friday), I am delegating to all of my desk heads the responsibility the following: 1) Have all of the forms attached spreadsheet forms complete 2) A product offering sheet is added to the template. Fletch & Dana - Please take the lead on creating the product offering list (physical and financial). My recommendation is we put products out through 03 for all regions (financial and physical). Obviously, the physical products will be contingent on receiving a power marketing license. Cory and Don Baughman - Please take a crack at identifying all of the transmission service agreements we need for the East (Christi has started a list already). The transmission agreement list attached can be used to prioritize or assign commercial people to transmission/pool agreements. It is not correct on the timing under the pools, so don't rely on that column.
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: NETCO Implemention Template
Q: TJ, The following Realtime employees on the East Power Desk will be working Monday September 3, 2001, Labor Day Holiday, during the day and night shift for the Northeast, Midwest, Southeast and ERCOT Realtime Desks. Don Baughman Dean Laurent John Kinser Juan Hernandez Miguel Garcia Joe Stepenovitch Larry F Campbell Maricio Trejo Joe Errigo Steve Olinde Alex McRealth Punit Rawal Carrie Larkwothy Jay Blaine Brant Reves David Maskell Michael Seely Peter Makkai Please advise Carmen Chavira, so that these employees receive Holiday Pay. Thank you,
Propose a subject line
A: EPMI Employees working during the Labor Day Holiday
IN: Tom and Tammy, After talking with Dan Masters yesterday, I believe we have the Buy / Sale incorrect in our system. In Sitarra, the deal (Sale side #672336) was set up for a monthly total of 10,920 (should acutally be 10,902) and was set up for March 16 - 31. Being that the dates were set as such, a total was calculated for those days only producing a volume of 5,632 to sell back to Enron LNG. Dan Masters says that the buyback contract was not supposed to be daily and should be for the full monthly amount of 10,902 mmbtu. He says that they sold us the full contract amount and that they bought back the full 10,902. Could both of you please look at this and correct the volumes in our system so that I can invoice Enron LNG for the 10,902 mmbtu instead of the 5,632? Please let me or Dan know if you have any questions.

Generate a subject line.

OUT: March Buy / Sale (BuyBack) with Enron LNG
IN: This is an email
The following items were presented in this week's corporate change control.... Feb. 11 From 5:00 p.m. - 6:00 a.m., the Envision team will perform hardware maintenance on the Envision system. This outage will affect corporate-wide applications accessing the Envision web query, FileNet Panagon IDM Desktop, FileNet IDM for R3, Panagon Capture professional. Users will be able to access IBuyit and IPayit from SAP but will not be able to view invoices. Feb. 16 From 10:30 - 11:30 p.m., the Omaha Infrastructure team will reconfigure the power connections for the Omaha Inverse MUX. This change will result in a total disruption of IP communication between Omaha and Houston. The outage should only last for a few minutes. The maintenance time will be coordinated with the HotTap helpdesk to ensure processing has been completed. All support staff whose applications are affected by this outage should communicate this change to their customers. Please ensure they are aware of the possibility of an extended outage in the event the Inverse MUX does not properly re-establish communications. LAT and DecNet communications for gas control will not be affected by this maintenance.

What is the subject?

OUT: ETS and Corporate Change Control
QUESTION: The volume and complexity of our legal work has increased dramatically over the past few years. I think this environment requires additional time to be devoted to legal planning and review in order to provide the best possible service to our clients. Within the next month, I have asked Janette to schedule a Quarterly Legal Review for each group listed on our new organizational chart . I would envision that we would focus on the following: review of the current monthly legal report and significant legal issues review of the top ten legal risks form contracts and other documentation projects legal budget legal resources, inside and outside performance metrics In addition, I am proposing that any energy trading contract for a term longer than one year by initialled by an AGC or member of the OGC. Let me know what you think about that. Mark Haedicke
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: Enron Wholesale Markets Quarterly Legal Review
IN: The Dow Jones report is compiled of data sent from many different counterparties. The lovely people at Dow Jones painstakingly analyze the data to ensure its accuracy. Averaged together, these prices become the Dow Jones daily index price. And that's the long and short of it. The process, as you've guessed by now, is a little more complicated than that. For one thing, Dow Jones looks at each counterparty's sales to reach an average of all the prices. It would be redundant for each counterparty to ALSO report their purchases from each other. Therefore, when calculating the Dow Jones data, we only include purchases from counterparties who ARE NOT participants in the Dow Jones survey. Following is a simple example: Participant List NP-15 Purchases NP-15 Sales Reported NP-15 Purchases Reported NP-15 Sales Sempra Sempra - $250 Sempra - $250 Avista - $270 Sempra - $250 Duke Duke - $260 Duke - $260 Duke - $260 Enron Avista - $270 Avista - $270 Avista - $270 Now that's simple! Following is the participant list for Dow Jones' survey of trading at NP-15 and SP-15 delivery points. Deals with these counterparty names need to be excluded from the calculation of PURCHASES at NP-15 and SP-15 delivery points. American Electric Power - Amerelecpo Avista Energy - Avistaene Duke Energy Trading and Marketing - Dukeenetra El Paso Merchant Energy Enron Power Marketing, Inc. - EPMI Idaho Power Company - Idacorpene PacifiCorp - PACE Pacific Gas & Electric Company - PG&E Powerex Corp. - PWX Puget Sound Energy, Inc. - PSPL Mirant Americas Energy Marketing (formerly Southern Company Energy Marketing) - SCEM TransAlta Energy Marketing (US) Inc. - Transalt So I've probably succeeded in confusing you even more, but please feel free to come bug me with questions. Good luck! Kate

Generate a subject line.

OUT:
Dow Jones Report