Here is an email: The information contained herein is based on sources that we believe to be reliable, but we do not represent that it is accurate or complete. Nothing contained herein should be considered as an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any financial instruments discussed herein. Any opinions expressed herein are solely those of the author. As such, they may differ in material respects from those of, or expressed or published by on behalf of Carr Futures or its officers, directors, employees or affiliates. ? 2001 Carr Futures The charts are now in the most recent version of Adobe Acrobat 4.0 and they should print clearly from Adobe Acrobat Reader 3.0 or higher. Adobe Acrobat Reader 4.0 may be downloaded for FREE from www.adobe.com. (See attached file: candlesticks33.pdf) - candlesticks33.pdf
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: option candlesticks as attachments 6/8
Q: Please take a minute to review the attached update on our activities and assumptions in Wholesale Power Trading and Risk Systems. As you might expect, most of our focus is on establishing independent NetCo and Estate operating environments. The second attachment is simply an FYI. It represents our current systems inventory (apps, hardware, developer software, etc...) for NetCo and Estate. Glad to discuss... Steve
Propose a subject line
A: Wholesale Power Systems Update
IN: I have received an inquiry through one of our employees (David Barr) from Chicago Partners, a consulting firm in Chicago. They specialize, among other things, in regulatory economics and could be useful as experts in our discussions with the government and regulatory agencies. One of the partners, Christopher Culp, is a well known commodity markets expert. Please, let me know if you are interested. Vince Kaminski

Generate a subject line.

OUT: Chicago Partners
IN: This is an email
Dear John, dear Vincent, Let me up-date you on the roundtables we decided in the last meeting to focus on during the rest of the academic year. The original idea was to keep the number of events from 3 to 4 roundtables each semester. The result of the last meeting with all members was driven by enthusiasm, and as you see below we produced a prolific list of 13 subjects. Maybe you can help us to narrow down to a reasonable number, 12 events (one we had yesterday) by May 2002 we think are too many. I also would take this opportunity to update on the ongoing relationships with the most prominent industry in the sectors and have your feedback, suggestion on how to group them in the roundtable. We got great support so far from Reliant, Enron, Mirant, Schell (Coral), Bp, Duke. El Paso, Chevron-Texaco, Phillips, and Halliburton etc.. also are interested and we will present the club to them as well. The major challenge for us is not transform the Energy Club in a Finance Energy Club. At Rice we already have a Finance club and it works very well. We want first educate about the energy industry in general, and second present the opportunities for MBAs in the industry in different areas, including finance but not limited to. Topics of Roundtable Meetings: 0) Energy "101" 1) Corporate Finance (Treasurer or Controller) 2) Energy Consulting 3) Financial Services (trading, risk management) 4) Origination, Marketing and Sales (Oil, Gas, Electricity) - Marteen 5) Project Development, strategic planning 6) Project Finance 7) Project Risk Management 8) Regulation, Deregulation, and Restructuring - Reliant done 9/17/2001 9) Structuring of Products 10) Supply Chain 11) Telecom - Broadband 12) Venture Capital within energy industry - Brian, Paresh Thanks in advance for your precious suggestions and I am looking forward to meeting you.

What is the subject?

OUT: Rice Energy Club Roundtable topics
QUESTION: Draft of transcribed message from Richard Sanders voice mail (Legal) to Rick Shapiro. Rick forwarded to Jim Steffes. FYI: "We have not seen the Reliant Protective Order. It's only been described to me by their General Counsel. And in the way it was described it was a document that we would probably agree to, because there's still some corks(? and provisions over disagreements about the Confidentiality. So, I'm gonna try to get Mike Kirby to get ahold of it this a.m. in terms of the theme to the Legislators. The question I've got is why haven't we even been offered that same deal? It shows clearly that they're trying to isolate us, and that they're treating us differently from everyone else., but I'm not sure how far that goes....."
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: Reliant Protective Order
IN: ** Reply Requested When Convenient ** John, Per our conversation, I am looking for a NYMEX plus basis quote for two customers in the Virginia Area for Nov01 through March02. One customer is located on TCO Op10 Mkt Area30 and the other customer is located on TCO Op10 Mkt Area31. Attached is their historical profile. Please let me know if you can deliver primary firm into these market areas. Thanks very much. I appreciate your help.

Generate a subject line.

OUT:
Quote