Q: (1) The ENA Securities Loan Agreement/ENE Guaranty was received by Bear on 2/22. Bear is preparing a form of assignment from ENA to Enron Credit Inc. (2) JP Morgan sending comments to Futures Agreement (3) I am reviewing Chase custody agreement. I need info on a legal contact at Chase. (4) ML Canada repo. Waiting for response. (4) Enron Credit Inc. accounts. Preparing form of assignment for all three accounts. Cheryl opening the accounts. NOTE: In general, Cheryl will be responsible for opening accounts.
Propose a subject line
A: agreement update

Q: Linda & Sharon, My primary job responsibility is to online trading, and right now EnronOnline is quite a beast of a customer. Because of that I please ask that you direct any future questions you may have with respect to confirmations to our two paralegals who handle the day to day trading, Susan Bailey at x34737 and Stephanie Panus at x53249. With respect to the two current Canadian confirmations, Sara Shackleton, an attorney in our Group, is working with Credit to resolve the questions on the Slater Steel and Casco credit worksheets.
Propose a subject line
A: Questions regarding Confirmations

Q: For Thursday - STWBOM will be short 75 mw on peak @ SP15. The three day-ahead pieces were sold @ $27.20 and $28 (BOM sales) and $29.97 (SP15 Peak Day-Ahead Index). Make real time purchases to cover the short under the STWHOURLY book. Enter an inter-desk sale from STWHOURLY to STWBOM. Then make a sale under the STWBOM book to the Cal-Imbalance to complete the deal. Also, STWBOM will be long 20 mw HE 2-5 @ PV. This is a parking deal with PNM done at $16 ($14 purchase price + $2 buy-resale fee). You'll notice we'll be long 20 mw for these hours in Real Time Position Manager. Please enter an inter-desk purchase from STWBOM under the STWHOURLY book @ PV and sell this off real time under STWHOURLY. Let me know if you have questions.
Propose a subject line
A: Short/Long Positions for 10/18

Q: Attached is a draft of Transwestern's response to the protest filed by the California Public Utility Commission in Docket No. RP97-288-017. Your comments would be greatly appreciated. I have gotten some additional information from Mark on USGT's use of westward capacity, which I haven't had the opportunity to review or incorporate in the attached draft. From what Mark has told me, it further supports the statement in our response that USGT has not made significant use of its westward capacity and that the CUPC's claim that Transwestern is being transformed into a pipeline that is dominated by shippers using negotiated rates is greatly exaggerated. We need to file the response on Wednesday. Therefore, I would appreciate receiving any comments by noon tomorrow. Thanks.
Propose a subject line
A:
USGT Negotiated Rate Filing/ Response to CPUC Protest