In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.

[Q]: Comment: Rep. Munoz's side of the story, Gegonos, is in the two letters that she wrote to a judge(s) advocating for two child rapists. Munoz's two letters are now public record in the state's court system and now they're indefensible. Whoever is running against Munoz in November better use this self-baptized blunder to unseat Munoz. Juneau's has a strong liberal base and I'll watch and see what the CONservative bases does with this politically incorrect issue. And don't forget it was Jack's wife that contacted OCS and made the formal report that her husband was having an inappropriate relationship with their foster daughter.
[A]: Agree

[Q]: Comment: justin will be a deer in the head lights with no clue what is happening.
[A]: Disagree

[Q]: Comment: I hope the governor keeps this in mind as the decision to dedicate state resources is made:

"Local residents in 2013 rejected a proposal to create a new taxing district where property owners would pay for flood and erosion control. The new district could have paid for dike repairs."

This sounds like a good opportunity for people who don't want the government in their lives to step up and take care of themselves.
[A]:
Agree