Categorize the comment on the basis of toxicity. If the comment is toxic (harmful, malicious, derogatory, threat, insult, identity attck, etc.) output Yes, otherwise output No.

Q: Those two are the sort who give white trash a bad name.

A: Yes
****
Q: Didn't see blazo's comment until after. Yeah and the same could be said to bring pot into the argument. Imagine the difference you'd see at international soccer games if marijuana was served instead of beer. I'm wagering you wouldn't see soccer riots. Ok, heroin. Or oxycontin. Have you heard of people being stabbed shot robbed burgled etc for money to buy these drugs? All the time? Marijuana. How often does someone get robbed for pot money? Only in extremely rare circumstances where the idiot was already very mentally ill.

A: Yes
****
Q: This article is actually fairly balanced for a New York Times article. Maybe they realize that they are the source of incitement for violence against democracy. Almost every article they have written on Trump includes gratuitous references to racism, fascism, misognyism, ism ism ism ism etc etc etc. And now they try to blame it on social media?

A:
No
****