TASK DEFINITION: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
PROBLEM: Sentience and its antithesis to that -"senseless", has and have taken hold, ironically paradigmed by the Rivers of Babylon, that Cradle of Civilization both mythical and actual that our nation's Owner class callously selected from which to re-make the current world into a unipolar, Cold War-founded and funded current madhouse.
These were actual choices made by the Owners of the (this) Nation. And in their determination to Own the rest of the world. It's an old ploy, it goes back to Manifest Destiny and where Teddy Roosevelt and his fellow white supremacists determined international brown people as both incapable and impediments to the larger cause of "white is right."
As if the 1965 US Civil Rights act ever made a dent in the above notion.
And then the cacophony of utter silence across the fruited plains of America when confronted with Abu Ghraib. But that's OK, we not only massacred hundreds of thousands in the Philippines, we waterboarded several thousand to ......Death. For Freedom!

SOLUTION: Yes

PROBLEM: Daniel, thanks for your reply. I don't believe that the people that disagree with my opinion are "idiots" or have "mental issues". I do however think that insulting people that disagree only ensures that they will not change their opinion. I believe that most people that want laws designed to protect people from themselves have only good intentions. In my opinion most of these types of laws look great on paper, just not in practice.

I live with chronic pain, I choose not to take pain medications because it would effect my work. I am happy with my choice because its the right choice for me. If the consequences of a persons choices don't have direct impact on my life, it should be none of my business what they do. This doesn't mean I shouldn't share my concern for the person, just that I shouldn't be empowered to coerce their decision making.

I also think that a doctor/pharmacy shouldn't ever be forced to write/fill a prescription they don't feel comfortable with.

SOLUTION: No

PROBLEM: Isolationism in the Middle East is looking better and better every day.

We no longer need their oil; we have already appeased one of the major combatants, Iran; Israel has the capability to nuke Iran or anyone else who wants to come after them and they all know it.

Where are our "National Interests" in the area? Let the Shii'a in Iran duke it out with Sunni Saudi Arabia as they are already doing in Yemen. Let those in the region, the Kurds, the Arabs and the Persians kill each other until they are satisfied.

In the meantime, we guard ourselves from all the overflow from there, whether it comes through Europe or wherever and re-evaluate what our military role, if any, is in the rest of the world consistent with our national interests, whatever they truly are.

SOLUTION:
Yes