Problem: Here is a premise:
Case studies use as data the impressions and judgments of the evaluator, which are inherently subjective.

Here is a hypothesis:
Some case studies use subjective judgments as data.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Sentence 1: To further understand the problems on the PAC-3 program, we focused on its seeker subsystem, which is key to acquiring and tracking targets and represents a large percentage of the missile's cost.

Sentence 2: The PAC-3 program is absolutely flawless as exemplified by the seeker subsystem.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: no

Question:
Again the instinct of action against insult took over.

Does it follow that "Insult must be met with action. "?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
yes

Q: If and signed 'Best Boy.' , can we say that "It was signed, "Best Boy.""?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A: yes

Premise:
"well it will be interesting seeing these games across the you know from London or wherever"
Hypothesis: Its only interesting to see the games here.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

no

Sentence 1: It is possible to reach terraces around the dome by climbing a staircase guarded by painted, man-bearing stone elephants.

Sentence 2: If one takes the stairs, they can reach the terraces.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer:
yes