Sentence 1: If the profits from the money making routes and non-delivered mail exceed the upstream fixed cost, then there must be an offset of money losing routes.

Sentence 2: There are no profits on any routes.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: no

Question:
The stubborn aristocracy and high clergy were anxious to protect their ancient privileges; a burgeoning bourgeoisie longed for reforms that would give them greater opportunity; the peasantry was no longer prepared to bear the burden of feudal extortion; and a growing urban populace of artisans groaned under intolerable hardships.

Does it follow that "The peasants later overthrew the aristocracy."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
it is not possible to tell

Q: If yeah i'm kind of thinking that's maybe our generation was uh so in tuned to music of that time that we identify goodness or badness with uh things now with the music that's behinds them, can we say that "Music is really powerful. "?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A: it is not possible to tell

Premise:
"It may have done, but Mr. Lawrence was away from home part of June.""
Hypothesis: Mr. Lawrence wasn't at home for a part of June.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

yes

input question: The mills in North Carolina exist because textile capital migrated from the Northeast in pursuit of low wages, no unions, and cheaper materials. If this premise is true, does that tell us:"Northerners were incensed at the shameless profiteering of local tycoons."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: it is not possible to tell

Q: If He reached for the arm around his neck and began breaking it free from its stranglehold., can we say that "He allowed the arm to continue choking him. "?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A:
no