Premise:
"you know their all the demonstrations that were going on i felt like they got way too much media coverage and publicity because those kind of people i mean you know they're the kind of people who are w ho've always got to have a cause whether it's good bad of indifferent they've got to have a cause and"
Hypothesis: These people always need to have a cause.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

yes

input question: Unconstitutional? If this premise is true, does that tell us:"Against the constitution"?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: yes

Question:
Based on the premise "After all, her husband and two sons had roads named after George Street and Princes Street.", can we conclude that "There were no roads named after her husband or sons."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
no

Question: Sentence A: The administration used the NEPDG as a mechanism to, among other things, outreach to selected non-governmental parties and develop a proposed comprehensive energy policy.

Sentence B: The NRPDG mechanism was used to non government parties to develop a comprehensive energy policy

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Question: On the Place de la Cathedrale, at the beginning of the Rue Merciyre, stands the 13th-century Pharmacie du Cerf, older than the cathedral and reputedly the oldest pharmacy in France.
The Pharmacie du Cerf was opened in 1250 a.d.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Problem: Here is a premise:
She says indigenous farmworkers, driven north by economic hardship, are more likely than Spanish-speakers to be denied wages or forced into substandard housing.

Here is a hypothesis:
Both indigenous farmworkers driven north and Spanish-speakers are denied wages equally.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer:
no