Premise:
"Opposing him was a collection of republicans, liberals, socialists, communists, and anarchists."
Hypothesis: There was nobody left to oppose him.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

no

input question: Facilities will also need to modify their Title V operating permit to incorporate the added control devices and the associated reduced emission limits. If this premise is true, does that tell us:"Facilities must change their Title V operating permit, which is causing much controversy."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: it is not possible to tell

Question:
Based on the premise "Funchal's new tourist zone testifies to local travel industry ambitions.", can we conclude that "The new tourist zone is run down."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
no

Question: Sentence A: If, to use two of Schor's examples, you don't want to put aluminum siding on your house or garb yourself in polyester, the only possible reason is that you don't want people to think you're a Bubba.

Sentence B: If you put aluminum siding on your house or wear polyester many will thing you're a Bubba according to Schor.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Question: A while ago we changed the internet-phone PBX system to comply with WebTel 4.0.5, because, you know, no sane person would stay with the ancient Web 3.0.'
We knew no one wanted the Web 3.0 system.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Problem: Here is a premise:
Doctors question claims that it aids memory in healthy people.

Here is a hypothesis:
There is a claim that doctors have a lot of knowledge.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer:
it is not possible to tell