Detailed Instructions: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.
See one example below:
Problem: Comment: President lied under oath about consensual sex...
Not the same thing as rape.
Solution: Sexual-explicit
Explanation: This comment explicitly mentions "consensual sex" and "rape", and thus is sexual-explicit.

Problem: Comment: Due process was provided when they were considered disabled and eligible for SSI. It was further provided when they were adjudged to require a cxonservator. If you wish to address "due Process", let's do look at "felons." Do you think it's reasonable to apply the standard to exclude a person convicted of tax evasion from purchasing or owning a firearm as applied to someone convicted of armed robbery or attempted murder? The ineligibility for firearm ownership was determined by "status" and, in the case of felons, that's a very broad status. Felons can "recover' their Second Amendment Rights, but it requires legal action on their part to do so.

Frankly, I would suggest those severely mentally-ill individuals who were excluded by the Obama Order were more of a danger than most felons.
Solution:
Non-sexual-explicit