The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.

Q: Context: 'I meant I would give you my firewood, what would you trade in return?' 'Oh sorry for the confusion. 😮 In that case, thank you for the generosity! 🙂 How about if I have 3 firewood, 1 food, and 1 water?' 'I can do that for 3 food and 3 water?'
Utterance: 'I think we're close. Let's shake hands on this: 3 firewood, 1 food for me, and then 2 food and 3 water for you. I'll make sure your food packages have extra doggy treats! 🙂 Is that a deal?'

A: No
****
Q: Context: 'I have a big party with varying degrees of health and I'm going to need every bit of firewood and food I can get my hands on! 🙂' 'hi, we may be in luck then, i really would like water as i enjoy walking and hiking, i will require some firewood though so i can roast some s'mores' 'How many people are in your camping party?'
Utterance: 'i have 6, and 2 more could be joining us to make 8 '

A: No
****
Q: Context: 'hii' 'Do you have an idea of how you'd like to split up the extra supplies?' 'yes food mostly must of one. and the used of firewood.'
Utterance: 'I was hoping to get some extra food just in case my kids get hungry. Would you be ok if I took 2 food and you could have 2 of the rest?'

A:
Yes
****