You are given first 5 messages from a series of message exchanges between 2 persons playing the game of Diplomacy which is an American strategic board game. You need to generate the next message. The message should be generated such that it fits the context seen so far. Avoid the text that is (i) tangent to the context, (ii) repeats the context.

Input: Consider Input: ['Hey Russia, looking forward to a great game 🙃. I think we should discuss Scandinavia 😉 and how to split it up. I'm not interested in attacking you, at least for a while. Hopefully you feel the same way. Anyways, good luck and have fun!', "Always good to discuss things in advance to avoid unnecessary nonsense. I'm not particularly interested in Norway so long as you're not interested in Sweden.", 'Sounds good', 'That was a hell of a bluff you must have pulled to put that army in the Netherlands', 'Thanks 😊.']

Output: So I'm guessing you plan on hitting the Germans then? Need help with that?

Input: Consider Input: ['Greetings!

I was just wondering what your aims were regarding territory in the area? May I suggest that we keep Tyr as a DMZ for the time being?', 'Hi there, Italy! In my experience, Austria and Italy fighting anytime before 1904 or so ends one way: they are both eliminated. So keeping a DMZ is good (ideally find a way to keep all four of TRL, ADR, TRI and VEN as a DMZ) but even better would be a joint goal we can work together on. Typically as Austria my thoughts are to keep Russia and Turkey from allying, and pick one side against the other. If you wanted to go after Turkey with me, that could work, but if you wanted to go after France (with either English or German help), I could go after Russia with Turkish help. In general, I guess I'm saying I'm willing to go almost any sensible way that goes along with an alliance which I can grow to trust 🙂', "I was definitely thinking of going after France, as I find they can quickly spiral out of control if uncontested.

Might be best if you go after Turkey with Russia and I'll focus my attention West", 'Awesome. I reached out to Russia and will let you know how that turns out. You have any indications that you'll get any help against France? It can be a slow and annoying slog if you go 1:1 against them...', 'England seems to be interested, so hopefully we can nip France in the bud ASAP']

Output: So how did we want to move in Spring to set us both up to feel safe and not tightly entangled in each other's business? Any particular moves you have in mind, given what you've been hearing?

Input: Consider Input: ["Hey there! Just your friendly neighborhood Russian Bear here, checking in and letting you know communication channels are open.
I assume we're looking at a standard Black Sea bounce, see how the rest of the Spring board looks, and going from there?", 'Hi yes happy to bounce Black Sea 🌊 what are your thoughts on austria?', "Betrayed? Bewildered? Wrong answer?
Seriously, no real opinion formed yet. He was first to reach out, standard fairly neutral greeting and fishing for info, noncommittal on plans beyond bouncing Galicia and trying not to anger any of his neighbors. I could go either way on that one. Life is a little easier for us if we clear that early.
So far the only player that strikes me as a bit of a wildcard is Italy. I suspect that one's going to move aggressively and erratically once he picks a direction - and that could be good or bad, depending.", 'Ok bounce in the black and let us assess in the fall', "*sigh*. This doesn't seem like the most productive way forward for either of us."]
Output: I have been playing a lot of gunboat lately