Premise:
"The uncertainties of schedules and frequency of strike action gradually disappeared in the 1990s, but the occasional wrinkle still needs to be ironed out."
Hypothesis: Before the 1990s, strikes were all but unheard of.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

no

input question: what about in international trials do you think they should have a jury there i think that would be kind of interesting If this premise is true, does that tell us:"Do you think they should get rid of juries in international trials? "?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: no

Question:
Based on the premise "Through the western Seishomon Gate is the Shishinden ceremonial hall, where emperors are enthroned a privilege retained by Kyoto after the move to Tokyo and where New Year's audiences are held.", can we conclude that "The Shishinden ceremonial hall is where peasants were buried."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
no

Question: Sentence A: Part III of this report analyzes applicable law and applies it to the findings in Part II.

Sentence B: The report analyzes applicable law within it.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Question: But the most important pleasure of Provence is not the sightseeing but the sun-soaked landscape, the leisurely pace of life, and the wonderful cuisine.
Provence serves only dishes that have fish or any other seafood.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Problem: Here is a premise:
and i just don't like that

Here is a hypothesis:
I really do not enjoy that.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer:
yes