In this task, you are given books product reviews in English language. The goal is to classify the review as "POS" if the overall sentiment of the review is positive or as "NEG" if the overall sentiment of the review is negative.
--------
Question: Not for the solo lawyer; not about marketing, except for the author . I was disappointed by this book. I am a solo litigation attorney, and I read the book to get ideas on marketing. It gave me some ideas. Perhaps the most valuable idea was to focus more on customer service; Dahut has an interesting discussion about exactly what that means and how we can do it better. By and large, however, this is a book by and for big firm attorneys. It is about big firm angst and how it can be combated by hiring experts such as Dahut to do extensive consulting work for your firm. Dahut does not acknowledge, and does not care, that most attorneys are solos or work in small firms, and that we have very different issues than agonizing over whether we have lost our soul by conforming to much to dead firm culture

Answer: NEG

Question: Excellent story for my 3-year old . I thought this was a wonderful story with exquisite illustrations. My 3-year old was enthralled with it, and checks it out from the library whenever she can. It's a good story about responsibility and treating animals with understanding, as well as getting ready for Santa's sleigh ride

Answer: POS

Question: Needed a hero . Well, considering all the exciting things that have been happening in my life, I was surprised that reading about the life of the universe was so dull. I can watch a sunset or listen to the sound of a bird singing and that can be wonderful. But I suspect that if the authors were to have written about a bird singing or the sunset, I wouldn't have recognized it let alone enjoyed it much. If this book was an attempt to synthesize science with the wisdom of all cultures then give me a genealogy from the Old Testament any ol' day. I could tell that the authors knew a lot, but unfortunately they didn't know enough about how to capture my attention. Now I'm no stranger to heavy reading so it can't be the density of information concealed in semi-poetic language that made the story unexciting. I think it was the tell-me-don't-show-me style of overlong explanations of the beauty and wonder of the universe that might have been significant in this regard. Unfortunately academicians haven't quite got the hang of how to make countless acts of procreation throughout the history of life sexy nor have they been able to capture the mystery of the ever-shy rainbow. It didn't help that it had a "we need to do better, us humans" ending. One might have made that criticism of the authors for their worthwhile undertaking fallen short

Answer:
NEG