POSREP HOEGH GALLEON, DATE: 11-May 12:00 8:00 (UTC) A) Position at noon: N 14 54 E 051 16 B) Dist. From last noon: 425 nm C) Dist. To go to next port: 774 nm D) ETA next port: Qalhat 13 0900 LT E) 1: Average sea/wind Sea: E 3 Wind: E 2 2: Average speed 18.48 kn RPM: 93.17 3: BOG consumed 0 m3 4: BOG Total 0 m3 5: F.O Consumed 164 m3 6: G.O. Consumed 0 m3 Brgds Knut Bentzr?d Master LNG/C "Hoegh Galleon" E-mail: master.gall@hoegh.no Teleph: Inmarsat tel.no.+873 330853910 Fax : Inmarsat fax no.+873 330853913 Telex : Inmarsat B telex no.+583 330853915 Telex : Inmarsat C telex no.+583 430853910 (24hrs.watch)
Answer: Posrep 11 May (RESEND)
Here is an email: After discussions with Elizabeth Sager and Leslie Hansen, we have developed a few additions to the EOL Paperless Confirm Amendment form to clarify that (1) neither party shall (not just that neither party is required to) send paper confirms, and (2) the transaction's records on EOL control over any conflicting terms in the underlying Governing Agreement. I have attached a draft below of a Consent and Agreement for Idacorp with the proposed changes in italics (see Para. 1(a)(i) and 3). We made this last change in anticipation of revised EOL power product definitions, which new definitions will conflict with important terms (such as the force majeure clause) in the Power Master. If you don't want any of these proposed changes to be made to the form as a whole, and would prefer that they be handled in the Power Annex so as to apply only to Power, please let me know. Janet
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: Suggested revisions to EOL Paperless Confirm Amendment text
Q: Sue Mara was correct on the call yesterday. While the PUC meets regularly on Thursdays, it appears they are having a meeting today at which the "Bilas Alternative" is up for a vote. Our information is that there is some likelihood that the decision will be approved----but please don't hold your
Propose a subject line
A: CPUC Decision to Make DWR Creditworthy and Hold Off on Implementing DA Prohibition
IN: Audrey, I'm in Chicago now but I need to ask you some questions about a few Sitara deals. They are 298277, 298283, and 298296. They are between EPMI and EMW. Are these deasl going to be settled by Unify? Do we currently see Unify invoices/verifications for EMW or EPMI? Thanks. DG

Generate a subject line.

OUT: EMW
IN: This is an email
Russell, will you please update me on the status of the Alliance Pipeline Corporate Guarantee? We need to have this guarantee as soon as possible, as we would like to begin flow on September 13, 2000. Thank you

What is the subject?

OUT: Status of Alliance Pipeline Corporate Guarantee
As requested at the meeting, the last couple years of history of our ethane content has been analyzed. The data provided by Denis Alters were for four locations: Perry from the West Leg side, Perry from the old or East Leg Side, Brooker (East Leg) and West Palm Beach. The table below shows the percent of the time the ethane content was above a given percentage at each of the locations. For example, at Brooker, the ethane content was greater than ( > ) 3% about 25% of the time. On the East leg, the ethane content has been greater than 2% all of the time. On the West Leg side, it has been over 2% about 44% of the time, over 3% about 17% and almost never over 4%. Basically, the West Leg runs about 1.5 to around 2% when all the Destin and Mobile Bay processing is operating. Even last winter, when running processing plants was not economical, the West Leg gas exceeded 4% only one day. If you look at the plot below (I hope it comes thru), you can see that thru July of this year, the West Leg ethane content had not returned to the levels seen prior to the gas price spike last year. This is consistent with the Btu analyses on Mobile Bay. Apparently they have the ability to reduce the level of ethane removal when iethane is more valuable as pipeline gas than as a chemical feedstock and are therefore have been leaving more in the gas this year than last.
Answer:
Ethane Content Various Locations July 99 thur July 01