Question: You ask an impossibility.
You are asking me to do something that's impossible.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Problem: Here is a premise:
He didn't.

Here is a hypothesis:
He did. Whatever it is, he did.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Sentence 1: Whatever had been done to them--or perhaps the absence of a true soul, whatever that was--left them rigidly bound to their past ideas and totally incapable of doing more than following orders by routine now.

Sentence 2: Even without souls they could do whatever they wanted.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: no

Question:
If so, it explains the steps in a final assessment and the actions to take, depending on the results of your additional work.

Does it follow that "If you put in enough additional works and bring on good results, you then have a clear picture of the actions to take."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
yes

Q: If For further discussion about accommodating consumer behavior in modeling fiscal policy, see N. Gregory Mankiw, The Saver-Spender Theory of Fiscal Policy, NBER Working Paper 7571 (February 2000)., can we say that "For further discussion talk to Gregory."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A: it is not possible to tell

Question: The preamble to the final rule contains an explanation of the need for the information and the burden estimates relating to each section of the rule.
The preamble to the final rule has an explanation for the necessity of information and burden estimates for every rule section.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer:
yes