Question: Sentence A: Dunkan gave him his attention.

Sentence B: He was given attention by Dunkan.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Question: It would also be nice if every female over the age of 16 had a $5,000 gift certificate at Tiffany's.
No female over the age of 16 would want a $5,000 gift certificate at Tiffany's.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Problem: Here is a premise:
Three months later, the company Perennial Cosmetics introduced at a chain of convenience kiosks a series of skin care products called 'Puddle New Line'.

Here is a hypothesis:
Perennial Cosmetics does not sell anything to do with the human body.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Sentence 1: Not so long ago the forecasts were for deficits as far as the eye can see.

Sentence 2: The forecasts died out
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question:
It has been architected, that is, to be different from the principle of non-discrimination in the original Net.

Does it follow that "It is not the same as the principle of non-discrimination."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
yes

Question:
Based on the premise "i've got better things to do with my life", can we conclude that "I don' have any better things to do in my life."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
no