Sara, I have confirmed that there is only one financial natural gas transaction between ENA and SGL. The deal number is QY5824.1. If you need more info, please let me know. Mike Bridges
Answer: SGL Carbon, LLC
Here is an email: Ken, I am responsible for managing Enron's banking relationships, and have been speaking to Rosalee about reserving time on your calendar for meetings with our top 4 banks. Given the uncertainty and tightness in the credit markets, Andy, Ben and I have discussed the importance of getting you and Andy in front the senior members of management at JPMorgan Chase, Citigroup, CSFB, and Deutsche Bank. We are expecting all of these institutions to play an important role in achieving our year-end financing plan. Rosalee has indicated that you may have time available on Tuesday, November 6th to meet in New York. Please let me know if you can make your calendar available for these meetings. Thank you,
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: Bank meetings in New York
Q: I am preparing a re-draft of a previous agreement for this Canadian company. Credit terms default for Duke Guarantor is 25M/ 50M for Enron. Triggering event for both parties is 10M w/ 250 multiples. Do you want to change these? It is my understanding we have guaranties in place. Please advise asap. Thanks!
Propose a subject line
A: Duke Energy Marketing Limited Partnership
IN: We have received the following executed documents from counterparty: 1. First Amendment to ISDA Master Agreement dated as of 04/27/99 between ECT and Engage Energy US, L.P. (i) making certain changes to setoff provisions and (ii) changing Counterparty's exposure threshold; and 2. ISDA Master Agreement (Multicurrency-Cross Border) between ECT Canada and Engage Energy Canada, L.P. executed 05/03/99, effective as of 01/31/97. Copies will be distributed.

Generate a subject line.

OUT: Engage Energy US and Canada
IN: This is an email
John: Please send Susan Flynn contact information for this counterparty so that we can send them our form of CA for the financial info that they intend to give us. I'm assuming that this is in connection with swaps that we will be doing with them. If there is anything else that we need to describe in the CA please let Susan know. Thanks.

What is the subject?

OUT: Southern Company
Hi Amy. Since you've taken over the responsibility for verbally confirming trades booked to John Arnold, Larry May, Mike Maggie, Dutch, and Andy Zipper, I just wanted to clarify that part of this responsibility includes clearing the trades in Deal Capture/Structure. When you verbally confirm a deal, you have to click on Counterparty and Verify the deal, noting with whom you verballed. If you don't do this, the confirms group has no way of knowing whether or not you've verbally confirmed the deal. Also, in keeping with our global standards for sending out confirmations, verballing should be done on Trade Day - although we give you until noon on T+1 before sending out your deals. At that point, any trades that are not verbally confirmed will be generated and sent. (This does not preclude the need for you to follow up with deals not yet verballed). The exception to this is, of course, if you have identified an economic discrepancy and "Actioned" the deal as such in TAGG - in this case we will wait until the Action has been cleared in TAGG. Me or someone in my group can come over an show you the process in TAGG if you're unfamiliar with it. (or Derek Bailey can show you too) Give me a call if you have any questions or if this deviates from your understanding of the process. Thanks, Diane 3.0443 PS - Also, can you or Errol let me know who in Risk is your backup for this function, as well as the brokered deals you check out? Thanks.
Answer:
Verbal confirmation for direct trades