You are given a review of Amazon's food products. Your task is to divide them into two classes: negative or positive, depending on the content of the review.

Example Input: Although it sounded delicious, I was very disappointed in this coffee. The coffee has a strange, chemical aftertaste ... cup after cup, not just once. Even when it brews, it creates a chemical sort of aroma. In fact, because our single-serve pod coffee brewer was new, I started thinking the problem was the brewer. We assumed it was a left-over manufacturing plastic or metal aftertaste coming through in the water. I even e-mailed the coffee machine maker (Bunn) to see how to remove the aftertaste. Imagine our surprise when a month later we opened a new pack of pods (regular Colombian, not flavored) and were delighted that our machine makes great coffee. When we made a cup of the Senseo Vanilla again -- back came the off-taste and aroma. Perhaps it's the "artificial flavors" used? Be forewarned!
Example Output: Negative

Example Input: What constitutes a good coffee is rather subjective. You can read countless reviews about it, but you don't know until you've tried it for yourself. Having enjoyed peaberry coffee (I think the spherical shape results in better roasting) from many different parts of the world , I gave this a shot based on the positive reviews posted and the great price. Boy, was I disappointed! The beans are light/medium in roast, has a mild subdued smell. The beans looked dry, but this is not uncommon for light roasts. I made a fine grind of the beans, and brewed it in a press. Sad to say, it was the most disappointing cup of coffee I have had in a long time. The flavor was stale, without any fruity characteristic of peaberries, and reminded me of a cheap cup of joe from a dirty diner. The worst part is I am stuck with 3 lbs of terrible coffee that cannot be returned (Amazon does not accept return of food items).
Example Output: Negative

Example Input: BEWARE! This is not the "flavor" displayed on the label of the pictured can of cat food in the photo. This is a photo of the original formula's label. I ordered 5 cases because the label indeed showed a photo of the label on the "Classic Chicken ENTREE with Brown Rice"..this was the ORIGINAL formula. Friskies phased out the original formula and REPLACED it with "Classic Chicken PATE with Brown Rice" (PATE IS ON THE LABEL OF THE NEW FORMULA). My cat LOVED the ORIGINAL formula. Friskies "replacement" formula is different (texture is nearly the same, so it has to be in the ingredients) MY CAT DOES NOT LIKE THE NEW FORMULA. I believe this is an outrage. Displaying one picture and then sending an entirely different labeled can? I am disappointed in Amazon. NOW, imagine the shipping expense to return 5 cases of canned cat food???? I had to separate the cases from the huge box in order to even lift them into the house!......$73+ down the drain. To add insult to injury...I can get this replacement "PATE formula" at my local Petco store (on sale) for the SAME PRICE per case. So much for trusting the photos of products displayed for sale on Amazon.
Example Output:
Negative