Definition: In this task, you will be shown a prompt from a judicial decision and multiple holding statements derived from citations following text in a legal decision. Holdings represent the governing legal rule when the law is applied to a particular set of facts. There are five answer choices for each citing text. The correct answer is the holding statement that corresponds to the citing text. You should write an incorrect option. Even though there exist multiple wrong answers, we only need a single wrong answer. There is a <HOLDING> token in the position of the citing text prompt where the holding statement was extracted.
Input: that fact, no genuine issue of material fact is created even if Goodman's recollection of that fact is hazy or susceptible to some doubt. Thus, for the purposes of deciding these Motions, the Court determines that Goodman's detention was somewhere between one to two hours long. Although no per se duration exists at which a Terry stop ends and an arrest commences, a 20-minute confinement has been held too lengthy to be appropriately characterized as an investigatory deten tion. Sharpe, 470 U.S. at 686, 105 S.Ct. 1568 (overturning a Court of Appeals decision and ruling that a 20-minute detention was reasonable under Terry because the police acted diligently and a suspect's actions contribute to the added delay); see also United States v. Perez-Esparza, 609 F.2d 1284, 1287 (9th Cir.1979) (<HOLDING>). Instances in which a lengthy delay of over
Holding statements: (A) holding that under fourth amendment standards for determining probable cause for arrest and probable cause for search and seizure are same (B) recognizing that an immigration arrest and detention needs to be supported by probable cause or reasonable suspicion (C) holding that detention for three hours in a checkpoint station required probable cause (D) holding that a forensic examiner in the employ of the state police could be liable in a claim for continued detention without probable cause (E) holding that in a 1983 action issue of probable cause is for the jury
Output:
holding that under fourth amendment standards for determining probable cause for arrest and probable cause for search and seizure are same