In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.
One example: Comment: Damn! Another cloudy day, and it's all Obama's doing!
Solution is here: Obscene
Explanation: This is obscenity because it hints on sexual content that is offensive to the public sense of decency.

Now, solve this: Comment: Pius took a great teaching on sexual freedom for Downs Syndrom and mentally ill patients and turned it on its head. As I said, he was acting in response to Lambreth. The majority of the encyclical was a vainglorous attempt to fight back against moderity. It was so quaint that there was an outcry for the Council to repeal it, which the Trads fought off and ultimately Ottoviani scuttled. Still, the economic logic still stands and I have no qualms in wanting birth control not to be necesssary for ecoomic reasons. Benedict echoed that in Caritas in Veritate. As for the pill, it regulated my ex-wife's emotions and removing it probably helped cause our divorce.
Solution:
Non-obscene