Being legally blind is not the only reason to use a computer up close.. So what could be the question?
Question followed by answer: Premise: "Blind man using a computer up close."
Hypothesis: "The man is only legally blind."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
it is not possible to tell

A kid cannot be an old man. Someone is a wheelchair is unable to run.. So what could be the question?
Question followed by answer: Given the sentence "A kid running thought a water while having fun." is it true that "An old man in a wheelchair."?
no

A man with a badge is standing on a wood floor next to a structure does not necessary that the wood is nearing collapse with the man on it.. So what could be the question?
Question followed by answer: Can we conclude from "A man with a badge is standing on a wood floor next to a structure." that "The wood is nearing collapse with the man on it."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
it is not possible to tell

Watching does not imply smoking a hookah and not all dances are a belly dance.. So what could be the question?
Question followed by answer:
If "Two people are dancing around with people watching them." does that mean that "Two women belly dance while men sit around smoking a hookah and watch them."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
it is not possible to tell