Premise:
"e) Protected herself with immunity when she needed to, even though her testimony would do enormous harm to Clinton and the nation."
Hypothesis: Clinton would certainly be ruined in politics after the testimony was given.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

it is not possible to tell

input question: It would be embarrassing if a lot of Slate readers failed this test, so I'm going to make it easy by adopting a very broad definition of rationality. If this premise is true, does that tell us:"Slate readers will be taking this one hour test online."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: it is not possible to tell

Question:
Based on the premise "Off the beaten path in Sham Shui Po, west of the junction of Nathan Road and Boundary Street, is the Lei Cheng Uk Han Tomb and Museum on Tonkin Road (open Monday Wednesday and Friday Saturday 10am 6pm, Sunday 1 6pm; closed Thursday).", can we conclude that "The tomb of Lei Cheng Uk Han has various Chinese noblemen buried there."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
it is not possible to tell

Question: Sentence A: Somebody changed the rules and it wasn't us.

Sentence B: Nobody changed the rules but we sure tried to..

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question: ! More than 75 percent of grantees are providing various forms of pro se assistance.
None of the grantees are providing assistance
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Problem: Here is a premise:
The first palatial structures at Knosses, and other great cities such as Phaistes and Malia, were erected around 2000 b.c., but these were destroyed by an earthquake 300 years later.

Here is a hypothesis:
The earthquake killed 1,000 people.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer:
it is not possible to tell