In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.

[EX Q]: Comment: I think I can grasp your feelings quite well. A woman makes some bad choices, putting her in this horrific gang rape situation, "Well it's her fault. She shouldn't have gotten drunk and left willingly with them. She should've known she'd be gang raped." If you were to look back at what you said and compared it to what you say you "feel", don't you agree that you're being hypocritical? Just saying the obvious. Victim blaming is victim blaming is victim blaming. There are no ifs or buts.
[EX A]: Non-threat

[EX Q]: Comment: Mocking religion is a western right. But yes the hypocrisy from liberals always assaults the intellect of average Canadians.
I'm only allowed to mock certain religions under Justins M-103, because some religions are more important then others.
[EX A]: Non-threat

[EX Q]: Comment: That same play was done in 2012, with Obama standing in as Caesar. Nobody cared; yet, it happens with Trump and conservatives clutched their collective pearls and gasped. Calder is a media troll living in a rich environment of media trolls. Conservative and Trumpist opinions and news abound on AM radio, tv news, in many newspapers, and online. CNN has probably hired more Trump apologists than any other station, to the detriment of honest debate and journaliam... not that conservatives would admit it, they would have to stop playing the victim on this subject if they did.
[EX A]:
Non-threat