The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the no-need strategy, otherwise output No. no-need is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used when a participant points out that they do not need an item based on personal context such as suggesting that they have ample water to spare. no-need can directly benefit the opponent since it implies that the item is up for grabs.

Context: 'No i absolutely need 2 food packages and 1 water. How about we do it like this... You take 1 food package, 2 waters and 2 firewoods. Does that work for you?' 'Sorry to bother you, I don't need anything other than food package. So better you could give me 2 food package and take 3 water and fire wood. Please consider this deal.' 'No i absolutely need 2 food packages. So if you cannot agree to take 1 food 2 water and 2 firewood i will walk away. If you have children with you would would also need water which you are not asking for. '
Utterance: 'Yes I too have children so only I am considering 2 food package, 1 water is enough for me and I dont need any firewood. So please accept this deal'
Yes

Context: 'Hi friend. 🙂 I'm going camping in the woods near my grandparents cabin. I'm inviting some friends along for a little bit of fun too because they have a guest house and a great field for tents. Would you like to come too? ' 'Oh that sounds awesome. I am actually going camping with my grandparents and my children. So I would love to have 2 firewoods for them. They get cold easily so I would like a little extra to make sure they can stay warm throughout the evening. 🙂' 'Yes, I would love to give you two firewoods! 🙂 My grandparents might check in on us, they like camping. But my grandpa has rheumatic problems so he needs lots of water. Could we take all three?'
Utterance: 'Thank you for the two firewoods. I totally understand that. Since we do have young children I want to make sure they stay hydrated so I would be willing to give you two if I can just have on extra for them.'
No

Context: 'Hmmm, I think I really need the firewood. I brought softwoods and they burn out quickly so I don't think I'll have enough wood to keep me going through the night. I get kinda scared without the fire. What is your priority?' 'Okay, well firewood is also my top priority since it will be so cold tonight. But I would be willing to take only 1 firewood (and give you 2) as long as I got 2 foods and 2 waters ' 'Thank you for the offer on firewood. I think that sounds fair. However, I really would like at least 2 waters as well. '
Utterance: 'Hmm unfortunately I can't budge since I would be accepting less of my top priority item. It sounds fair to me though; I'd get 5 items in total but less of my top priority and you would get 4 items in total but more of your top priority'
No