IN: This is an email
This is a good time to bring this up. Unless the original CES agreement has changed, ENA will pay CALP a monthly demand charge of $103,417 from 1/1/2000 - 4/30/2000. From 6/1/2000 - 7/7/2000, ENA will pay a (volumetric) demand charge of $.02/mmbtu to CALP for any volumes utilized by ENA. Which brings up 2 important points; 1.The month of May has not been addressed which means Robin needs to discuss this with CALP (and she may have already) However, currently we will not be showing any demand estimates for May. 2. It's a new ball game starting 7/8/2000. Comments/questions?

What is the subject?

OUT: CGAS contract 64231
QUESTION: <<MF September 4th 2001.pdf>> Good Tuesday Morning - Comments From The Local Guys! Last week, the markets got so oversold, that the ARMS Index (a technical market measure that, broadly speaking, indicates how oversold the market is), closed above 2.00 on two consecutive days for the first time since Oct. 16 and 19, 1987!! It is, apparently, one of the rarest occurrences in the world of technical analysis. As we said, it has been 14 years since the the markets generated such a reading. The NYSE is currently rallying however, tech is still struggling. Lets hope today's strength translates broadly across all sectors. The 30 -year bond yield is 5.49%.
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: The Morning Market Call - Tuesday September 4th, 2001.
ENA Legal (TBD) 1. ENA Legal is responsible for deal documentation and legal sign off for the transaction, and is typically responsible for all transaction-related agreements documents such as MOUs/MOIs, Participation or Development Agreements, and any Agreement, which directs the operation of the project (O&M Agreement, Steam Agreement, Gas Agreement, Power Purchase Agreement, etc.). 2. ENA Legal represents the interests of advises the origination and development team (and other members of ENA management as appropriate) on all legal aspects of a transaction, accessing internal and external resources as required. and reviews/synthesizes comments from the all the groups. 3. ENA Legal works with origination team, Accounting, Global Finance and Tax in structuring the transaction, and communicates with EECC (and others) as required during the execution of the project to faciliate compliance with the structure. Recommendations for improving the interaction between EE&CC and ENA: 1. EE&CC Legal should be involved in the beginning of the process of drafting documents by EE&CC Contract Administration, unless other procedures have been agreed. 2. Due to conflicts of interest, EE&CC Legal cannot represent NEPCO while at the same time working with the deal team. to procure equipment for the same project. ENA Legal and EECC Legal should be advised early in the process of any project-related agreements being generated by EECC, so that compliance with overall deal structure and risk profile can be ascertained. 3. Comments returned to EE&CC need to either be incorporated in the next draft, or if there are issues on the comments, they need to be discussed with the ENA Legal representative or Origination contact, prior to distribution to vendors. 4. EECC Legal and ENA Legal should communicate regarding issues common to both companies so that consistency in position can be achieved as much as possible. Forms of "standard" agreements should be discussed/agreed to enhance consistency. 5. Service and consulting agreements not specific to a particular transaction which can be untilized by multiple Enron companies via tasking letters should be prepared by EECC. EECC should provide information concerning the existence of such service agreements. 6. ENA Legal would should work closely with EE&CC contract administrators in drafting equipment in the preparation of contracts which the contracts personnel have been tasked to prepare. EECC Legal can assist by providing input, but is not required by ENA to sign off on such contracts.
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: My suggested changes to bullet points re: legal role
This is a very rough draft based on an agreement done previously with a jv company. I'm sending it for Enron review only, since I haven't even read the entire thing yet. I thought you might want to take a look at it to see what you think, and to consider the scope of the services to be provided. As for legal services, one alternative would be to have the services provided by an outside law firm, not associated with either principal. Could you forward me what you received from Clement regarding the corporate guaranty issue? I would like to see what's the latest in that regard. Thanks,
Answer: Services agreement
Here is an email: CNG would like to stop by the office to do some TTT training next Wed, Thur, or Fri. Please let Marde know if you have a preference as to which day you would like to meet with CNG. I may or may not be here. Thanks
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: CNG Training
QUESTION: Have you heard any more about this? I didn't see it on my calendar. This does conflict with Philippe's Thursday staff meeting I believe. Maybe Philippe will cancel that. Let me know. Thanks. --Sally
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS:
Lite Bytz Panel Discussion