In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Q: Comment: You triggered a memory of a Washington Post magazine article of a man in suburban WDC who had his whole house wired to hear Rush Limbaugh in every room around the clock. And he was "a devout Catholic!"
You'd think if he was "a devout Catholic" he might have the house wired to hear the gospel in every room around the clock. But, no!
He got more of a rush from Limbaugh than the gospel, eh?

A: Non-obscene
****
Q: Comment: Totally ignorant of the law and Constitution, aren't you?

A: Non-obscene
****
Q: Comment: This is embarrassing .... for Romney and Bush

"Uniting the Country", as they suggest Trump do would mean we reject racial bigotry and violence based on racism while tacitly accepting violence committed in the name of quashing Free Speech.

Both are heinous and both should be called out. Why are middle-road Neo Conservatives always foolishly ending up as tools of left wing narratives?

A:
Non-obscene
****