QUESTION: Hello, following up our PGE Budget presentation I am forwarding you the following information. Jessica - the 2002 Capital Slide has been revised to be consistent with the NNG disclosure schedule. The decommissioning forecast is up by $1.6 MM, however since this is funded by the decommissioning trust it should not be an issue. Tracy - Do you have a time and agenda set for the Nov. 1 dry run of the budget presentation? I may be sitting in for Piro so please keep me posted as to what the plan is. Rod - you asked for some detail on our IT capital expenditures. The file IT_Teresa includes the requested detail. Note that in our UE-115 ratecase we were authorized to expend up to $96.8 MM for the 2000-2002 budget years. This is a balancing account, such that if we don't expend the money we have to refund it to customers. As an fyi - I've pasted in below the language from our UE-115 Stipulation on IT costs. Q. What is the basis for the stipulation relating to issue S-45, CIS / IT Disallowance? A. After a Staff review of new IT systems and their associated capital costs, Staff has determined PGE's capital costs for new IT systems to be prudent. As a result, the Parties agreed to full recovery of PGE's IT investments, subject to a Staff audit. PGE will place into base rates 100% of the 2002 revenue requirement related to the 2000, 2001, and 2002 capital additions for the CIS/IT capital items listed below. The 2002 revenue requirement included in base rates will be trued-up to the actual revenue requirement for the CIS/IT capital costs. OPUC Staff will audit PGE's actual capital expenditures for the CIS/IT capital items listed below. 1. Customer information system. 2. Enterprise resources planning (ERP) system. 3. Network meter reading (NMR) backbone and data store (excluding the meters). 4. Miscellaneous capitalized information technology costs. Some of the forecasted 2000-2002 capital additions may be delayed until 2003. Delayed costs can also be recovered, subject to the same Staff audit procedures and standards. Only those costs that are reasonable and prudent will be authorized for inclusion in the "actual" revenue requirement calculation. Accordingly, customers will receive a refund for any costs PGE does not expend or costs the OPUC finds imprudent.
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: PGE 2002 Capital Costs and IT Detail
Good morning- Discussions have taken place between EBS (Barry Pearce) and RAC (David Port) to make adjustments to the EBS daily risk-reporting process. This memo will outline the changes that have been discussed and agreed upon. EBS will implement these changes this week. DPR All risk books will be run on Tuesday and Thursday of each week and P&L will be reported for those days. POSITIONS AND CURVES Pending an IT solution, positions and curves will be loaded each day. On days when the books are not run, we will use prior day information. Per discussions with Credit, this process is sufficient for counterparty exposure reporting. CASH FLOWS Cash flows will be loaded on days the books are run. Infinity will pick up prior information on days when books are not run.
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: New EBS Procedures for Risk Management Books
Will send it out to you today. I need your Drivers License # & expirary date for compliance purposes since Sept. 11 to make sure you are not a terrorist or $ launder. We now need only once for every trade, switch , redemption some photo id with a # on it. bmg
Answer: re[6]: RRSP Cont.
Here is an email: Deb and Marie, Each of you provided me with a list of authorized confirmation signatories earlier this month. However, while reviewing the confirmation documentation requested in conjunction with the paper and steel process audit we notice that the individuals listed below were not identified on the lists of authorized confirmation signatories we received. Could you please verify that the individuals listed below were authorized as confirmation signatories during the period January 1, 2001 through August 31, 2001. We would greatly appreciate it if we could receive this documentation as soon as possible as we are attempting to complete the process audit by Monday, October 29, 2001. If you have questions please contact me at X56955. 1. Greg Hermans 2. Raymond M. Bowen 3. Debbie Nicholls 4. Robert Crane 5. Brenda Herod 6. Lisa McClendon Thank you for your time and consideration. Mike D. *******************Internet Email Confidentiality Footer******************* Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply email. Please advise immediately if you or your employer do not consent to Internet email for messages of this kind. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message that do not relate to the official business of my firm shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it.
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: Paper and Steel
Q: Notice No. MS-76 November 14, 2001 COMMODITY EXCHANGE, INC. MEMBER FIRM PRIVILEGES Please be advised that effective with the close on November 2, 2001, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., has acquired Merrill Lynch Futures, Inc. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. has assumed the clearing member firm privileges of Merrill Lynch Futures, Inc. As a result, Merrill Lynch Futures, Inc. has been terminated as a clearing member firm of COMEX. Members and Member firms have (10) days from the date of this notice to advise the Corporate Secretary's Office of any claims against Merrill Lynch Futures, Inc.
Propose a subject line
A: (MS-76) MEMBER FIRM PRIVILEGES
Here is an email: In an effort to get cash in the door for TW and to maximize revenue opportunity for TW in the coming year, I think we should look at getting two proposals on file with the FERC as soon as possible. One would be the OBA filing we have been discussing (and trying to support with historical data) to get automatic cash-out on OBA's in "constrained" areas on TW. Second would be to look at filing for scheduling by price at alternate FT points. This may be the time (the market to California is not so hot) to try to implement this. I know we will have to look hard at the cost of the system modifications required and whether we can justify them. Glen is already scheduling a meeting next week for further discussion of the OBA tariff filing. Could we discuss scheduling alternate FT by price at the same meeting?
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A:
OBA & Scheduling Alt FT by Price Tariff Filings