input question: that's one difference there really wasn't a lot of difference If this premise is true, does that tell us:"There was no difference."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: no

Question:
Based on the premise "Bauerstein had it analysed "that's just it! ", can we conclude that "Bauerstein had a special interest in conducting the exams himself. "? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
it is not possible to tell

Question: Sentence A: One day, soon perhaps, the public will have to stop gaping at the ability of Boris Yeltsin 'to be good at times of crisis.

Sentence B: Yeltsin was good when there was a crisis.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Question: so who's going to beat them who are they going to blow it to
Who are they losing the game to, the Clippers?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Problem: Here is a premise:
Napoleon himself only ever saw a wood and canvas the arch was completed during the 1830s.

Here is a hypothesis:
The arch had been completed during Napoleon's reign.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question:
I don't believe it, she moaned.

Does it follow that "She didn't believe it."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
yes