input: Make use of the article to answer the questions. (CNN)A Michigan man is accused of threatening to behead the police officer who put Eric Garner in a chokehold.

Alvaro Eduardo Guzman-Telles, 29, said in a Facebook post in December he was "going to personally kill and behead Daniel Pantaleo" and that "this is a written threat and has to be taken extremely seriously," the FBI alleges in a federal indictment.

He was arrested last month and faces a charge of interstate transmission of threatening communications, according to the indictment.

Pantaleo, a New York City police officer, put Garner in a chokehold while trying to arrest him last July on suspicion of illegally selling cigarettes. Garner died after the encounter, but a grand jury declined in December to indict Pantaleo, sparking large demonstrations across the nation.

Guzman-Telles also allegedly said on Facebook to "kill all cops on sight. No matter the circumstances."

The New York office of the FBI tracked the social media posts back to an address in Sterling Heights, Michigan, where Guzman-Telles' mother was questioned. She said she was aware of the postings and told her son to delete them for she feared the posts would get him in trouble, the FBI said.

1. Who is Pantaleo?
2. who put Garner in a chokehold?
3. When did Garner die?
4. Why was Garner being arrested?
5. Did a jury indict the officer?
6. How old is Telles?
7. What did he post?
8. Who posted on Facebook?
9. Did Telles say to kill all cops?
10. Where is Telles from?
11. When did he post on Facebook?
12. Is the FBI involved?
13. Did Telles mother advise him?
14. Did she agree with her son?
15. What is Telles charged with?
16. Did Garner's case spark protests?
17. What did his mother tell him to do?
18. What office tracked his posts?
19. Was his mother questioned?
numbered_answers: 1. a New York City police officer
2. Pantaleo
3. last July
4. suspicion of illegally selling cigarettes
5. no
6. 29
7. going to personally kill and behead Daniel Pantaleo
8. Alvaro Eduardo Guzman-Telles
9. yes
10. Sterling Heights, Michigan
11. in December
12. yes
13. yes
14. unknown
15. interstate transmission of threatening communications
16. yes
17. delete them
18. The New York office of the FBI
19. yes

input: Make use of the article to answer the questions. Brownie and Spotty were neighbor dogs who met every day to play together. Like pairs of dogs you can find in any neighborhood, these two loved each other and played together so often that they had worn a path through the grass of the field between their houses. One evening, Brownie's family noticed that Brownie hadn't returned home. They went looking for him with no success. Brownie didn't show up the next day, and, although they made their efforts to find him, by the next week he was still missing, Curiously, Spotty showed up at Brownie's house alone, barking and jumping. Busy with their own lives, they paid no attention to the nervous little neighbor dog. Finally, one morning Spotty refused to take "no" for an answer. Ted, Brownie's owner, was continuously disturbed by the angry, determined little dog. Spotty followed Ted about, barking all the time, then rushing toward a nearby empty lot and back, as if to say, "Follow me! It's urgent!" Eventually, Ted followed Spotty across the empty lot as Spotty stopped to race back and barked encouragingly. The little dog led the man to a deserted spot a half mile from the house. There Ted found his beloved Brownie alive, one of his legs crushed in a steel trap . Frightened, Ted now wished he had taken Spotty's earlier appeals seriously. Then Ted noticed something. Spotty had done something else besides leading Brownie's human owner to his trapped friend. In a circle around the injured dog, Ted found some food remains of every meal. Brownie had been fed that week! Spotty had been visiting Brownie regularly, in the hope of keeping his friend alive. Spotty had actually stayed with Brownie to protect him from hunger and other dangers, and keep his spirits up. Brownie's leg was carefully treated and he soon got well again. For many years thereafter the two families watched the faithful friends chasing each other down that well-worn path between their houses. 1. Who loved each other and played together?
2. Who noticed that Brownie didn't return home
3. Who arrived to help look for Brownie
4. And who was getting mad about it?
5. who was led by spotty to an empty lot
6. and who was there
7. who kept brownie alive
8. how?
9. what body part of brownie was cared for
10. did their owners remain in contact after
numbered_answers: 1. Brownie and Spotty
2. Brownie's family
3. Spotty
4. Spotty
5. Ted
6. Brownie
7. Spotty
8. fed him and protected him from hunger and other dangers to keep his spirits up
9. Brownie's leg was carefully treated
10. yes

input: Make use of the article to answer the questions. A dog who chewed off his owner's infected toe while he was passed-out drunk has been called a lifesaver. Jerry Douthett had been out drinking when his dog Kiko bit off a large part if his big toe. His wife, Rosee, rushed him to hospital where tests showed the 48-year-old musician had dangerous high blood-sugar levels. Doctors told him his toe would have had to be cut off anyway.

Mr Douthett said he had refused to get medical advice despite his toe being swollen for months. "I was hiding it from people, Rosee included," he said. "It smelled , and I look back now and realize every time we'd visit someone with a dog, their dog would smell all over my foot."

The night before Mr Douthett had agreed to see a doctor, he passed out at home after going out drinking. He said, "I woke up and the dog was lying along side by foot. I said, 'Ah, there's blood everywhere.' I ran to the bathroom and started to scream."

However, he believes Kiko could sense the disease coming from his big toe. "He's a hero," Mr Douthett said. "It wasn't an aggressive attack. He just ate the infection. He saved my life. He ate it. I mean, he must have eaten it, because we couldn't find it anywhere else in the house. I look down. There's blood all over, and my toe is gone."

Before the operation, Mr Douthett asked a nurse, "Is there any chance I can get whatever's left of my toe, so I can give it to Kiko as a treat?" Kiko is still with the family but is under observation by authorities. 1. What happened to the drunk person's toe?
2. By who?
3. Why did the dog do that?
4. Why did the man want to keep the remainings of his toe?
5. Why was he thankful about this incident?
6. What was the doctor's assessment?
7. How did dogs react to his gross toe?
8. What did he discover upon awaking?
9. And where was his dog?
10. And where was his toe?
11. What did the authorities do?
12. What was Jerry's profession?
13. What did the hospital tests show?
numbered_answers:
1. it was chewed off
2. his dog
3. he could sense the disease
4. give it to Kiko as a treat
5. He saved his life.
6. his toe would have had to be cut off anyway.
7. smell all over his foot."
8. blood everywhere.
9. along side his foot
10. couldn't find it
11. under observation
12. musician
13. dangerously high blood-sugar levels