instruction:
In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.
question:
Comment: Yes a PM who was put in place by the establishment, the same establishment that gave us Kathleen!!!!

Truly its only been a year and what do we see: Allllll key campaign promises broken, sky rocketing energy cost, expensive weak immigration policy's, soaring housing cost, out of control debt, zero foreign policy's, conflict of interest charges and multiple lavish vacations in one year!!!!

Yes Canada is back

IF f i voted for change I would be sick to my stomach.

SIMPLY PUT, GOVERNMENT WON THE ELECTRON AND TAX PAYERS LOST!!!!!!!!
answer:
Non-obscene

question:
Comment: The University, for whatever, reason decided to terminate Mr. Walls' contract. It was an amazingly "one-sided" document..ostensibly written for four years....but, with a "without cause" clause which allowed the University to terminate it with only one month's notice. The administration exercised that legal right and terminated Mr. Walls with no stated "cause".....that was perfectly legal...however "unfair" it might seem. On the other hand, perhaps they did have "cause" but chose to "take the easy way out" and not go through the hassle of proving any justification for his termination. They experienced considerable "blowback" because of their actions and, it seems, decided to "buy off" Mr. Walls for $90K...."here that this damn money and go away!" The whole fiasco reflects very badly on the administration...these guys make too much money to be so horribly incompetent...Gary Crum
answer:
Obscene

question:
Comment: His mother (and sister) should be tried for treason, first.
answer:
Non-obscene