Bill, Attached is worksheet that provides some comparables of the USGT volumes that flowed west. In the scheme of things, the volumes in question our not that significant. Look at the "comparables" page of the excel file. This missing section should be given to you by Dennis Lee on Monday. I'm out next week but I should be available by cell phone or my home phone (713)665-4026. Mark
Answer: response to PUC protest of USGT deal
Here is an email: Attached is your morning research report for Thursday, August 30, 2001. Please contact me if there are particular companies or sectors that you are interested in hearing from. (713-853-2407) Thank You,
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: Morning Research Report for Thursday, August 30, 2001
Q: Tom, As I stated earlier, we have not given much thought to an LNG terminal in the Freeport area as we anticipated that the basis market would be in the minus $.20 range. If you add the $.05 to $.10 to build a pipeline from the terminal to an interconnect, such a project has trouble competing with others on the table. After talking with Daren and yourself, it may well be worth doing some more research to get better projections of what those numbers might be. I would like to take this further and stack such a project up to others we are evaluating. As you stated, we need to do a better analysis of the pipeline situation in the Freeport area to evaluate the economics of the project. Please inform me as to if and how we should proceed with this matter. Thank You,
Propose a subject line
A: LNG Terminal in Freeport
IN: Dear Phillip, Our records show that you haven't visited us in awhile. We know how busy life can be - and how hard it is to stay in touch with family and friends you don't see every day. That's where we can help. Here at MyFamily.com, we're creating special services to help you keep in touch with your friends and family - faster and for free:

Generate a subject line.

OUT: Keep in touch - faster and for free
IN: This is an email
You may recall that Lilly entered into a joint venture with Chugai in 1999 to gain assistance with developing a number of Lilly compounds in Japan and as an opportunity to work closely with Chugai as a prelude to acquiring a significant interest in the company. As we discussed in June, it became clear that Lilly would not acquire such interest in Chugai and we no longer need Chugai's help with clinical development. Therefore, we decided to terminate the joint venture. Attached to this message is a copy of the press release Chugai will issue tomorrow morning regarding the dissolution of the joint venture and a related amendment to the 1995 agreement under which Chugai will co-market raloxifene. Please do not hesitate to call me if you have any questions in this regard. Alecia A. DeCoudreaux - CLCR Release Eng final version.doc

What is the subject?

OUT: Chugai
please add Fred Lagrasta Vice President for signature authority for ENA Upstream Company, LLC effective immediately. This is pursuant to the restructuring of ENA UPstream and producer wellhead groups sent in a memo to ENA employees 10/24. If you have any questions or comments, please let me know. lisa 5 4766
Answer:
signature authority for ena upstream