One cannot smile at the camera while his back is turned to the camera.. So what could be the question?
Question followed by answer: Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "A person wearing a blue mambo shirt has his back to the camera."
Hypothesis: "A person smiles at the camera."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
no
A muzzled animal is the same as an animal wearing a muzzle.
The question and answer are below.
Given the sentence "A muzzled animal jumps over a metal bar and splashes through the mud." is it true that "An animal is wearing a muzzle."?
yes
Drag queen and boys are different. Sitting and eating are different activities.
The question and answer are below.
Premise: "Drag queen sitting in a chair at a parade."
Hypothesis: "The boys are eating ice cream."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
no
Playing and napping are mutually exclusive activities. The children cannot be both in a river and on the bank of a river (which means that you are next to a river).. So what could be the question?
Question followed by answer: Premise: "Children playing in a river."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "Children napping on the bank of a river." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
no
One would not close their umbrella and open it at the same time.
The question and answer are below.
If "A woman standing outside a store is trying to close her umbrella." does that mean that "A woman walked into the store with her umbrella open."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
no
Just because Several children and parents are at a colorful inflatable maze does not mean they are having fun.
The question and answer are below.
If "Several children and parents are at a colorful inflatable maze." does that mean that "The kids and parents are having fun."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
it is not possible to tell