You will be given a definition of a task first, then an example. Follow the example to solve a new instance of the task.
In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Comment: Damn! Another cloudy day, and it's all Obama's doing!
Solution: Obscene
Why? This is obscenity because it hints on sexual content that is offensive to the public sense of decency.

New input: Comment: The TDSB has a history of doing stupid things.

About 20 years ago it removed all the play equipment from school yards because it did not meet CSA (Canadian Standards Association) standards.

It did so because of a perceived risk of harm to children despite no reports of injuries from equipment that had been in place for years. It did not have the money at the time to replace the equipment which I recall eventually cost a $million (probably $5 million today).

This was a complete waste of money and play equipment. The situation arose because the CSA changed its standards, which they occasionally do. However, such changes were minor and intended typically only apply to new installations, not retroactively.

Is it not wonderful how fools can spend other peoples money so easily and without any accountability?
Solution:
Non-obscene