[Q]: How to remove red wine stain from grout<br>Use a paper towel to blot any excess liquid from a fresh spill. Don't reach for a cloth towel because the red wine will stain the towel. Use a paper towel soaked in dish soap and warm water to scrub the stain. Red wine spills happen often. OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No
[A]: It's impossible to say
Problem: Randy gets drunk<br>Randy wants to have a good time. He buys some beers. He drinks them all. He becomes drunk. Randy passes out from all the drinking.

Based on the paragraph above can we conclude that " Randy only drinks 12% of drinks he buy"? OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No

A: No
Q: Victor Conte had only one pair of shoes.
In 1999, Victor Conte was sent two vials of a new drug by a chemist he knew and he started giving it to some of his clients. Including says Conte, one of Americas most iconic sportswomen, Marion Jones, who was about to compete in the 2000 Sydney Olympics.
OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No
A: It's impossible to say
Kasyanov was sacked by Putin in February 2004, after he had become critical of the Kremlin's politically motivated legal attack on the Yukos oil giant and its owner, billionaire Mikhail Khodorkovsky.
Kasyanov had blue eyes. OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No
A: It's impossible to say
input hypothesis: Larry Bliss has taught zach
Context: Lawrence Steven Bliss, commonly known as Larry Bliss, is an American educator and former politician from the state of Maine. A Democrat, he served in the Maine House of Representatives (20002008) and the Maine Senate (20082011). He resigned as a senator on April 15, 2011 after accepting a position as an administrator in the California State University system and leaving the state of Maine.
OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No
true or false: It's impossible to say
input hypothesis: Congress extended the term within the past 20 years.
Context: Could we then go back to Justice O'Connor's question? To make that very specific, if we agree with you, does that mean that we would, in principle, have to hold the 1976 extension unconstitutional? I mean, in 1976, Congress extended the term from 28 years renewable once, to life of the author plus 50 years. Now they're extending it life of the author plus 70. If the latter is unconstitutional on your theory, how could the former not be? And if the former is, the chaos that would ensue would be horrendous.
OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No
true or false:
No