Question: Sentence A: Adrin could see the dust of the months of travel on the leather boots and clothing of these two men.

Sentence B: Adrin could see the men were travelers.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Question: After the war, sugarcane and pineapple production remained strong for a time, but tourism began its rise to ascendancy.
Apples and oranges were close competitors to the pineapples.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Problem: Here is a premise:
When territory wasn't acquired by conquest Sind from Baluchi princes, Punjab and Kashmir from the Sikhs, Maharashtra and Delhi from the Marathas, or Assam from Burma the British annexed it by so-called Principles of Lapse and Paramountcy.

Here is a hypothesis:
When territory wasn't taken by conquest it was annexed by the British through the Principles of Lapse and Paramountcy.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Sentence 1: oh gosh bless your heart

Sentence 2: Your heart, bless it.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: yes

Question:
Within a week the snoop had discovered his unlisted phone numbers, bank balances, stock holdings, and salary, as well as the phone numbers of everyone he calls.

Does it follow that "The snoop was planning to blackmail the people."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
it is not possible to tell

Question:
Based on the premise "I loved leafleting when I was in college, handing out flyers to passers-by.", can we conclude that "Leafleting was entertaining to me."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
yes