I don't know Sabrina Rank. Please return this request to the person who originated it so that the Manager section can be completed. By including the manager's name, that will help me to identify who this person is, what job they perform and whether or not the request makes sense. I have over 400 people in my group, so without more detail on these requests it is not worth taking my time to approve these. --Sally
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: Your approval is requested
John: Hi, there! As you are aware of the structuring for tax purposes, until the U.K. corporate agent is actuallly formed, there is nothing further that I can do. That formation should happen today or tomorrow. With the actual name and agreements with ENA and ECT Investments, Inc., I can provide that information to Instinet and the other trading platforms you are interested in transacting on. Just FYI, the Instinet people are merely waiting for the agent agreement in order to proceed. Please let me know if you have any further questions. Sara
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: Instinet and other platforms in the name of ENA or ECT Investments, Inc.
This email is to let you know that the October 2001 version of NEWGen is available for download on www.rdionline.com. If you do not want to receive this email please reply with unsubscribe me as the subject line. Thank You,
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: NEWGen October Release
Dave and Scott, I saw an article mentioning that EPA published a draft guidance (66 Fed. Reg. 52,403) clarifying the definition of "stationary source" to allow heat/power co-generation facilities to be treated as separate sources from the underlying host facility (e.g., a manufacturing plant) for NSR purposes. Although the focus of the draft guidance is on cogeneration facilities, I suppose that there might be some general language in there that could clarify the single-source analysis as it pertains to the ancillary equipment at our plants for which no separate BACT analysis was done. Are either of you familiar with the new draft guidance (or with anything else that we could use to bolster our position on this issue)? Many thanks, Ryan
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer:
Pompano/Deerfield: threshhold requirements - single source