Given the task definition, example input & output, solve the new input case.
In this task, you are given text for US Congressional and California state bills, your task is to generate a summary for this bill.
Example: SECTION 1. LIABILITY OF BUSINESS ENTITIES PROVIDING USE OF FACILITIES
TO NONPROFIT ORGANIZATIONS.

(a) Definitions.--In this section:
(1) Business entity.--The term ''business entity'' means a
firm, corporation, association, partnership, consortium, joint
venture, or other form of enterprise.
(2) Facility.--The term ''facility'' means any real
property, including any building, improvement, or appurtenance.
(3) Gross negligence.--The term ''gross negligence'' means
voluntary and conscious conduct by a person with knowledge (at
the time of the conduct) that the conduct is likely to be
harmful to the health or well-being of another person.
(4) Intentional misconduct.--The term ''intentional
misconduct'' means conduct by a person with knowledge (at the
time of the conduct) that the conduct is harmful to the health
or well-being of another person.
(5) Nonprofit organization.--The term ''nonprofit
organization'' means--
(A) any organization described in section 501(c)(3)
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and exempt from
tax under section 501(a) of such Code; or
(B) any not-for-profit organization organized and
conducted for public benefit and operated primarily for
charitable, civic, educational, religious, welfare, or
health purposes.
(6) State.--The term ''State'' means each of the several
States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto
Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, the Northern
Mariana Islands, any other territory or possession of the
United States, or any political subdivision of any such State,
territory, or possession.
(b) Limitation on Liability.--
(1) In general.--Subject to subsection (c), a business
entity shall not be subject to civil liability relating to any
injury or death occurring at a facility of the business entity
in connection with a use of such facility by a nonprofit
organization if--
(A) the use occurs outside of the scope of business
of the business entity;
(B) such injury or death occurs during a period
that such facility is used by the nonprofit
organization; and
(C) the business entity authorized the use of such
facility by the nonprofit organization.
(2) Application.--This subsection shall apply--
(A) with respect to civil liability under Federal
and State law; and
(B) regardless of whether a nonprofit organization
pays for the use of a facility.
(c) Exception for Liability.--Subsection (b) shall not apply to an
injury or death that results from an act or omission of a business
entity that constitutes gross negligence or intentional misconduct,
including any misconduct that--
(1) constitutes a crime of violence (as that term is
defined in section 16 of title 18, United States Code) or act
of international terrorism (as that term is defined in section
2331 of title 18) for which the defendant has been convicted in
any court;
(2) constitutes a hate crime (as that term is used in the
Hate Crime Statistics Act (28 U.S.C. 534 note));
(3) involves a sexual offense, as defined by applicable
State law, for which the defendant has been convicted in any
court; or
(4) involves misconduct for which the defendant has been
found to have violated a Federal or State civil rights law.
(d) Superseding Provision.--
(1) In general.--Subject to paragraph (2) and subsection
(e), this Act preempts the laws of any State to the extent that
such laws are inconsistent with this Act, except that this Act
shall not preempt any State law that provides additional
protection from liability for a business entity for an injury
or death with respect to which conditions under subparagraphs
(A) through (C) of subsection (b)(1) apply.
(2) Limitation.--Nothing in this Act shall be construed to
supersede any Federal or State health or safety law.
(e) Election of State Regarding Nonapplicability.--This Act shall
not apply to any civil action in a State court against a business
entity in which all parties are citizens of the State if such State
enacts a statute--
(1) citing the authority of this subsection;
(2) declaring the election of such State that this Act
shall not apply to such civil action in the State; and
(3) containing no other provision.
Output: Shields a business entity from civil liability relating to any injury or death occurring at a facility of that entity in connection with a use of such facility by a nonprofit organization if: (1) the use occurs outside the scope of business of the business entity; (2) such injury or death occurs during a period that such facility is used by such organization; and (3) the business entity authorized the use of such facility by the organization.
Makes this Act inapplicable to an injury or death that results from an act or omission of a business entity that constitutes gross negligence or intentional misconduct, including misconduct that: (1) constitutes a hate crime or a crime of violence or act of international terrorism for which the defendant has been convicted in any court; or (2) involves a sexual offense for which the defendant has been convicted in any court or misconduct for which the defendant has been found to have violated a Federal or State civil rights law.
Preempts State laws to the extent that such laws are inconsistent with this Act, except State law that provides additional protection from liability. Specifies that this Act shall not be construed to supersede any Federal or State health or safety law.
Makes this Act inapplicable to any civil action in a State court against a business entity in which all parties are citizens of the State if such State, citing this Act's authority and containing no other provision, enacts a statute declaring the State's election that this Act shall not apply to such action in the State.
This Bill focuses on shielding business entities from civil liability relating to an injury or death depending on the conditions of injury, hence the generated summary is correct.

New input case for you: SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ''Standards Development Organization
Advancement Act of 2002''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

The Congress finds the following:
(1) In 1993, the Congress amended and renamed the National
Cooperative Research Act of 1984 (now known as the National
Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993 (15 U.S.C. 4301
et seq.)) by enacting the National Cooperative Production
Amendments of 1993 (Public Law 103-42) to encourage the use of
collaborative, procompetitive activity in the form of research
and production joint ventures that provide adequate disclosure
to the antitrust enforcement agencies about the nature and
scope of the activity involved.
(2) Subsequently, in 1995, the Congress in enacting the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15
U.S.C. 272 note) recognized the importance of technical
standards developed by voluntary consensus standards bodies to
our national economy by requiring the use of such standards to
the extent practicable by Federal agencies and by encouraging
Federal agency representatives to participate in ongoing
standards development activities. The Office of Management and
Budget on February 18, 1998, revised Circular A-119 to reflect
these changes made in law.
(3) Following enactment of the National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act of 1995, technical standards developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus standards bodies have replaced
thousands of unique Government standards and specifications
allowing the national economy to operate in a more unified
fashion.
(4) Having the same technical standards used by Federal
agencies and by the private sector permits the Government to
avoid the cost of developing duplicative Government standards
and to more readily use products and components designed for
the commercial marketplace, thereby enhancing quality and
safety and reducing costs.
(5) Technical standards are written by hundreds of
nonprofit voluntary consensus standards bodies in a
nonexclusionary fashion, using thousands of volunteers from the
private and public sectors, and are developed under the
standards development principles set out in Circular Number A-
119, as revised February 18, 1998, of the Office of Management
and Budget, including principles that require openness,
balance, transparency, consensus, and due process. Such
principles provide for--
(A) notice to all parties known to be affected by
the particular standards development activity,
(B) the opportunity to participate in standards
development or modification,
(C) balancing interests so that standards
development activities are not dominated by any single
group of interested persons,
(D) readily available access to essential
information regarding proposed and final standards,
(E) the requirement that substantial agreement be
reached on all material points after the consideration
of all views and objections, and
(F) the right to express a position, to have it
considered, and to appeal an adverse decision.
(6) There are tens of thousands of voluntary consensus
standards available for government use. Most of these standards
are kept current through interim amendments and
interpretations, issuance of addenda, and periodic
reaffirmation, revision, or reissuance every 3 to 5 years.
(7) Standards developed by government entities generally
are not subject to challenge under the antitrust laws.
(8) Private developers of the technical standards that are
used as Government standards are often not similarly protected,
leaving such developers vulnerable to being named as
codefendants in lawsuits even though the likelihood of their
being held liable is remote in most cases, and they generally
have limited resources to defend themselves in such lawsuits.
(9) Standards development organizations do not stand to
benefit from any antitrust violations that might occur in the
voluntary consensus standards development process.
(10) As was the case with respect to research and
production joint ventures before the passage of the National
Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, if relief from
the threat of liability under the antitrust laws is not granted
to voluntary consensus standards bodies, both regarding the
development of new standards and efforts to keep existing
standards current, such bodies could be forced to cut back on
standards development activities at great financial cost both
to the Government and to the national economy.

SEC. 3. DEFINITIONS.

Section 2 of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act
of 1993 (15 U.S.C. 4301) is amended--
(1) in subsection (a) by adding at the end the following:
''(7) The term 'standards development activity' means any
action taken by a standards development organization for the
purpose of developing, promulgating, revising, amending,
reissuing, interpreting, or otherwise maintaining a voluntary
consensus standard, or using such standard in conformity
assessment activities.
''(8) The term 'standards development organization' has the
same meaning as the terms 'voluntary consensus standards body'
and 'voluntary, private sector consensus standards body' as
such term are used in section 12(d) of the National Technology
Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 and in Circular Number A-
119, as revised February 10, 1998, of the Office of Management
and Budget.
''(9) The term 'technical standard' has the meaning given
such term in section 12(d)(4) of the National Technology
Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995.
''(10) The term 'voluntary consensus standard' has the
meaning given such term in Circular Number A-119, as revised
February 10, 1998, of the Office of Management and Budget.'';
and
(2) by adding at the end the following:
''(c) The term 'standards development activity' excludes the
following activities:
''(1) Exchanging information among competitors relating to
cost, sales, profitability, prices, marketing, or distribution
of any product, process, or service that is not reasonably
required for the purpose of developing or promulgating a
voluntary consensus standard, or using such standard in
conformity assessment activities.
''(2) Entering into any agreement or engaging in any other
conduct that would allocate a market with a competitor.
''(3) Entering into any agreement or conspiracy that would
set or restrain prices of any good or service.''.

SEC. 4. RULE OF REASON STANDARD.

Section 3 of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act
of 1993 (15 U.S.C. 4302) is amended by striking ''of any person in
making or performing a contract to carry out a joint venture shall''
and inserting the following: ''of--
''(1) any person in making or performing a contract to
carry out a joint venture, or
''(2) a standards development organization while engaged in
a standards development activity,
shall''.

SEC. 5. LIMITATION ON RECOVERY.

Section 4 of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act
of 1993 (15 U.S.C. 4303) is amended--
(1) in subsections (a)(1), (b)(1), and (c)(1) by inserting
'', for a standards development activity engaged in by
standards development organization against which such claim is
made'' after ''joint venture'', and
(2) in subsection (e)--
(A) by inserting '', or of a standards development
activity engaged in by a standards development
organization'' before the period at the end, and
(B) by redesignating such subsection as subsection
(f), and
(3) by inserting after subsection (d) the following:
''(e) Subsections (a), (b), and (c) shall not be construed to
modify the liability under the antitrust laws of any person (other than
a standards development organization) who--
''(1) directly (or through an employee or agent)
participates in a standards development activity with respect
to which a violation of any of the antitrust laws is found,
''(2) is not a fulltime employee of the standards
development organization that engaged in such activity, and
''(3) is, or is an employee or agent of a person who is,
engaged in a line of commerce that is likely to benefit
directly from the operation of the standards development
activity with respect to which such violation is found.''.

SEC. 6. ATTORNEY FEES.

Section 5 of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act
of 1993 (15 U.S.C. 4304) is amended--
(1) in subsection (a) by inserting '', or of a standards
development activity engaged in by a standards development
organization'' after ''joint venture'', and
(2) by adding at the end the following:
''(c) Subsections (a) and (b) shall not apply with respect to any
person who--
''(1) directly participates in a standards development
activity with respect to which a violation of any of the
antitrust laws is found,
''(2) is not a fulltime employee of a standards development
organization that engaged in such activity, and
''(3) is, or is an employee or agent of a person who is,
engaged in a line of commerce that is likely to benefit
directly from the operation of the standards development
activity with respect to which such violation is found.''.

SEC. 7. DISCLOSURE OF STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY.

Section 6 of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act
of 1993 (15 U.S.C. 4305) is amended--
(1) in subsection (a)--
(A) by redesignating paragraphs (1), (2), and (3)
as subparagraphs (A), (B), and (C), respectively,
(B) by inserting ''(1)'' after ''(a)'', and
(C) by adding at the end the following:
''(2) A standards development organization may, not later than 90
days after commencing a standards development activity engaged in for
the purpose of developing or promulgating a voluntary consensus
standards or not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of
the Standards Development Organization Advancement Act of 2002,
whichever is later, file simultaneously with the Attorney General and
the Commission, a written notification disclosing--
''(A) the name and principal place of business of the
standards development organization, and
''(B) documents showing the nature and scope of such
activity.
Any standards development organization may file additional disclosure
notifications pursuant to this section as are appropriate to extend the
protections of section 4 to standards development activities that are
not covered by the initial filing or that have changed significantly
since the initial filing.'',
(2) in subsection (b)--
(A) in the 1st sentence by inserting '', or a
notice with respect to such standards development
activity that identifies the standards development
organization engaged in such activity and that
describes such activity in general terms'' before the
period at the end, and
(B) in the last sentence by inserting ''or
available to such organization, as the case may be''
before the period,
(3) in subsection (d)(2) by inserting '', or the standards
development activity,'' after ''venture'',
(4) in subsection (e)--
(A) by striking ''person who'' and inserting
''person or standards development organization that'',
and
(B) by inserting ''or any standards development
organization'' after ''person'' the last place it
appears, and
(5) in subsection (g)(1) by inserting ''or standards
development organization'' after ''person''.
Output:
Standards Development Organization Advancement Act of 2002 - Amends the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993 to provide that, in any action under the antitrust laws, the conduct of a standards development organization (SDO) while engaged in a standards development activity shall be subject to a rule of reason standard.Limits the amount recoverable and attorney's fees with respect to standards development activity engaged in by an SDO.States that an SDO may, not later than 90 days after commencing activity for the purpose of developing or promulgating voluntary consensus standards or 90 days after enactment of the Standards Development Advancement Act of 2002, whichever is later, file simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Commission a written notification disclosing: (1) the name and principal place of business of the SDO; and (2) documents showing the nature and scope of such activity. Allows an SDO to file additional disclosure notifications as appropriate to extend protections under this Act to standards development activities that are not covered by, or that have changed significantly since, the initial filing.Includes standards development activity within notice, disclosure, and withdrawal from notification requirements of the Act.