Categorize the comment on the basis of obscenity. If the comment is obscene output Yes, otherwise output No.

Q: I am unsure of where you are going with this, for all the years you camp out on this post you have shown to be a 150% supporter of all things ultra conservative. You once posted to me that the state of Alaska was in such great fiscal shape and it was all due to the fact that most governors were elected GOP and that we have a GOP led majority in the state legislator. Well, those posts to me were a long time ago, are you not happy that your conservative led Alaska government did not save the day?

A: No
****
Q: For PETA, catching fish is 'animal abuse'.

For some Hindus, a different religion, killing mosquitos is forbidden.

For some Hindus, the doctrine of Ahimsa discourages wanton destruction of nature including wild and cultivated plants. Hermits (sannyasins) are urged to live on a fruitarian diet so as to avoid the destruction of plants.

Choose your religion.

A: No
****
Q: "Dams thwart salmon migration, degrade water quality, alter water flows and contribute to fish diseases and algae bloom problems."

Meanwhile. the sudden rush of "experts" on hydrology, power production, etc. pile up like train wreck online and clearly don't give "dam" about salmon migration or water quality.

A:
No
****