Question: Sentence A: The number of possible deliveries (which ranges from 670 to 411) is dependent on route terrain.

Sentence B: Often times, people who have less deliveries are people who have to go off road to get to their destination.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question: There are other explanations besides that of imbecility," I remarked.
It is clearly for those who have the capability to understand it.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Problem: Here is a premise:
and and that's acceptable

Here is a hypothesis:
That isn't acceptable.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Sentence 1: This scheme is far from perfect, but uninsured kids already get the hospital care they need when they're sick because hospitals pass unpaid costs along to states and private insurers.

Sentence 2: This scheme is far from perfect, uninsured kids get hospital care when they're sick and hospitals pass the unpaid costs to states and private insurers resulting in a huge bill for them.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question:
The convulsions were of a violence terrible to behold.

Does it follow that "The convulsions were mild and passed quickly."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
no

Question:
Based on the premise "The writers had to make their points in terms that people of the time would understand.", can we conclude that "The writers didn't even attempt to write in terms that the people of the time could understand."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
no