You will be given a definition of a task first, then some input of the task.
In this task, you must classify if a given review is positive/negative, indicating your answer as P or N.

michael crichton has had a long career of writing novels , many of which are science fiction .
the most profitable film adaptation of any novel was an adaptation of a michael crichton science fiction novel .
so in the logic of the film industry a good way to make a profitable film would be to make a big - budget adaptation of another crichton science fiction novel .
congo failed , and i am afraid that sphere is probably not going to fare a whole lot better .
it a little better than just okay novel and
it makes a film that is not even that good .
the film is expensive , over one hundred million dollars ; is long , 133 minutes ; has a terrific cast , including dustin hoffman , samuel l . jackson , and sharon stone ; but has little that is really original and less that is exciting .
several years ago dr .
norman goodman ( played by dustin hoffman ) was asked to write up a set of procedures for the government to follow if an alien entity was actually encountered .
the plan he wrote was only semi - serious , but did explicitly define a team of experts who should investigate the alien .
now that team has been assembled by a mysterious team leader named barnes ( peter coyote ) to study a spacecraft almost a half mile in length that apparently dropped into the pacific ocean in the early 1700s .
suddenly norman 's less than serious procedure has become an action plan for dealing with a real alien spacecraft .
included in the team to investigate are mathematician harry adams ( samuel l . jackson ) , biologist beth halperin ( sharon stone ) , and astrophysicist ted fielding ( liev schreiber )
.
together they travel to the deep pacific spaceship to understand its secrets .
one major secret is the meaning of the huge sphere of gold - toned liquid metal at the heart of this spaceship .
what is disappointing about this film is that it does not have really effective performances .
director barry levinson is at his best with good actors rather than good special effects .
the problem here is he is making a big - budget science fiction film .
it has some effects , but the most intriguing effect he shows only as an outline on a radar screen .
the technique is to suggest rather than to show and let the actors and the viewer 's imagination carry the film as robert wise did with the haunting .
that could be a reasonable approach in a low - budget film .
but that requires creating much more atmosphere than levinson can manage to muster .
it requires the actors to give really compelling performances and simply put , they do n't .
hoffman 's acting seems muted .
jackson seems to laid back .
we do not feel for these characters and do not get inside their heads
.
levinson paid big bucks for his actors and does not really get price performance .
and why we have queen latifah as a minor functionary on the expedition
is anybody 's guess .
a cast of unknowns could have delivered as much emotional impact at a fraction of the price .
look how much more powerful a film like alien was with only moderate actors .
most science fiction spectaculars these days have second - tier actors and first - tier special effects .
levinson tries second - tier effects , and first - tier actors , but never makes that exchange pay off for the viewer .
perhaps sci - fi spectaculars are just not an actor 's medium .
the result gets a 4 on the 0 to 10 scale and 0 on the -4 to +4 scale .
Output:
N