In this task, you are given an abstract of article. Your task is to generate title for this article. Preferred titles are under thirty words.

Input: Consider Input: CONTEXT Certification by an American Board of Medical Specialties (ABMS) member board is emerging as a measure of physician quality.
OBJECTIVE To identify demographic and educational factors associated with ABMS member board certification of US medical school graduates.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Retrospective study of a national cohort of 1997-2000 US medical school graduates, grouped by specialty choice at graduation and followed up through March 2, 2009. In separate multivariable logistic regression models for each specialty category, factors associated with ABMS member board certification were identified.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE ABMS member board certification.
RESULTS Of 42,440 graduates in the study sample, 37,054 (87.3%) were board certified. Graduates in all specialty categories with first-attempt passing scores in the highest tertile (vs first-attempt failing scores) on US Medical Licensing Examination Step 2 Clinical Knowledge were more likely to be board certified; adjusted odds ratios (AORs) varied by specialty category, with the lowest odds for emergency medicine (87.4% vs 73.6%; AOR, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.03-3.20) and highest odds for radiology (98.1% vs 74.9%; AOR, 13.19; 95% CI, 5.55-31.32). In each specialty category except family medicine, graduates self-identified as underrepresented racial/ethnic minorities (vs white) were less likely to be board certified, ranging from 83.5% vs 95.6% in the pediatrics category (AOR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.33-0.58) to 71.5% vs 83.7% in the other nongeneralist specialties category (AOR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.64-0.96). With each $50,000 unit increase in debt (vs no debt), graduates choosing obstetrics/gynecology were less likely to be board certified (AOR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.83-0.96), and graduates choosing family medicine were more likely to be board certified (AOR, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.01-1.26).
CONCLUSION Demographic and educational factors were associated with board certification among US medical school graduates in every specialty category examined; findings varied among specialty categories.

Output: Factors associated with American Board of Medical Specialties member board certification among US medical school graduates.

Input: Consider Input: The localization and synthesis of basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) in the rat carotid artery were investigated at times of chronic smooth muscle cell proliferation. Immunocytochemical staining showed the presence of bFGF in the uninjured arterial wall, and after balloon injury, this cellular staining was decreased. Western and northern blot analyses likewise showed that the amount of bFGF protein and mRNA decreased after injury. A neutralizing antibody to bFGF was administered 4 and 5 days after injury and was found to have no effect on intimal smooth muscle cell proliferation. These data suggest that an increase in the expression of bFGF is not necessary for chronic smooth muscle cell proliferation observed after balloon catheter injury and that bFGF is not the major mitogen responsible for intimal smooth muscle cell proliferation.

Output: Intimal smooth muscle cell proliferation after balloon catheter injury. The role of basic fibroblast growth factor.

Input: Consider Input: OBJECTIVE To assess whether population screening for impaired vision among older people in the community leads to improvements in vision.
DESIGN Systematic review of randomised controlled trials of population screening in the community that included any assessment of vision or visual function with at least 6 months' follow up. SUBJECTS Adults aged 65 or over.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE Proportions with visual impairment in intervention and control groups with any method of assessing visual impairment.
RESULTS There were no trials that primarily assessed visual screening. Outcome data on vision were available for 3494 people in five trials of multiphasic assessment. All the trials used self reported measures for vision impairment, both as screening tools and as outcome measures. The inclusion of a visual screening component in the assessment did not result in improvements in self reported visual problems (pooled odds ratio 1.04:95% confidence interval 0.89 to 1.22). A small reduction (11%) in the number of older people with self reported visual problems cannot be excluded.
CONCLUSIONS Screening of asymptomatic older people in the community is not justified on present evidence. Visual impairment in this age group can usually be reduced with treatment. It is unclear why no benefit was seen. Further work is needed to clarify what interventions are appropriate for older people with unreported impairment of vision.
Output: Effectiveness of screening older people for impaired vision in community setting: systematic review of evidence from randomised controlled trials.