In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

[EX Q]: Comment: The American public is sensitive to intent, and the general public's view of gossip is that gossip is a form of intentional harm.

I'm wondering how much the public is aware that the sex tapes contained a fair amount of racial slurs that lead to the WWE dropping Terry Gene Bollea's contract?

I suspect it's the loss of income more than the embarrassment of the sex that lead to the suite. Especially, as Heather Clem has said, that their sexual relationship was encouraged by her then husband, and Hulk Hogan's friend, Bubba the Love Sponge.
[EX A]: Sexual-explicit

[EX Q]: Comment: No, but when he called the Pharisees white sceplechurs doing things for show, he certainly was. You are taking their side. I am not endorsing sin, but I am saying it is not a device for social control that the reactionaries want it to be. By the way, the shame culture mostly going away in the Church is why so many stopped going to Mass. They no longer felt compelled by a necessitary to have a belief in the belief in God. Put another way, if you had a young person in your life who really did not believe in God, would you insist they go to Communion or even Mass (especially if they would do Communion if they attended)? The answer is they can stop going because they are Apostate and then, and pretty much only then, would their receiving be a sacralidge. Had they masturbated? Not so much.
[EX A]: Sexual-explicit

[EX Q]: Comment: >>white supremacists fill comment forums with your waste products? Not sure Civil Comments is working out the way the G&M intended...
.
Victimhood and labels - that's how the left deals with opposing opinions.
[EX A]:
Non-sexual-explicit