Q: If Willey claims Landow used her two-day stay at the estate to badger her into saying nothing happened with Clinton., can we say that "Willey says Landow badgered her into saying Clinton was innocent, but she truly believed otherwise."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A: it is not possible to tell

Premise:
"Red walked into the house and said cheerfully, "Time for lunch, I guess." He looked from one parent to the other in quick speculation at their fixed stares and said, "Got to clean up first, though," and made for the other door."
Hypothesis: Red announced it was meal time before leaving again.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

yes

input question: i mean i heard of it before but i never i never seen it If this premise is true, does that tell us:"I heard of it but didn't see it because I didn't have cable."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: it is not possible to tell

Question:
Based on the premise "In the name of Yugoslav unity, Tito suppressed most assertions of ethnic identity.", can we conclude that "They held back on the assertions of the ethnicity. "? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
yes

Question: Sentence A: Recently, three economists named Harold Cole, George Mailath, and Andrew Postlewaite (for whom I will use the collective abbreviation CMP) have proposed a compromise between the two On the one hand, people do not care directly about their relative positions in the wealth distribution.

Sentence B: Harold teaches economy at a university.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question: Sentence A: well the nursing home is covered by uh social security see

Sentence B: The nursing home is paid for by Social Security.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer:
yes