IN: EA Estate Group: Please see the below reference of Enron's vacation eligibility, allowance, and scheduling policy: Vacation Eligibility: All regular full-time employees are eligible for vacation based on continuous service. Regular part-time employees receive 40 hours per year of paid vacation per year. Temporary employees are not eligible for vacation. Vacation Allowance: Vacation allowance is based on an employee's continuous service according to the following schedule. Employees must be on the payroll and actively at work as of the first business day of the calendar month to accrue vacation for that month. If the first day of the month falls on a holiday or weekend, causing the employee to have a hire date other than the first, the vacation accrual date will be dated the first of the month so that the employee will accrue vacation for the month. (For example, an employee with a hire date of January 5, 1998 will have a vacation accrual date of January 1, 1998. The intent of this change is only to affect the vacation accrual date as explained; it is not to affect any other term, condition, privilege, or benefit of employment.) Length of Continuous Service--Vacation Allowed

Generate a subject line.

OUT: Vacation Policy Information
IN: This is an email
Richard: Does Enron Credit Inc. have U.S. resident officers/directors? Cheryl Nelson is trying to set up three U.S. brokerage accounts and needs signatories. Please let Cheryl know. Thanks.

What is the subject?

OUT: Enron Credit Inc.
QUESTION: Boys, At the risk of him saying "It's no big deal fellas", I need to notify you that Brother John Grumbles, will be undergoing exploratory heart surgery via the ole catheter up the leg procedure sometime very soon. The Drs. are telling him he's most likely got a partially clogged artery at the bottom of his heart and if he does, they will proceed with the angioplasty procedure at the same time. Dr. Fullerton has already contacted him as have several of us local guys and I think IT IS A BIG DEAL and I know he would appreciate a call. The surgery was actually scheduled for a couple of days ago but was cancelled at the last minute because of a doctor screw up. His phone number is 972 617-2412. Nothing like a big dose of -kai-when
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: [smu-betas] Grumbola
Attached is latest version - due to quick turnaround, there may be a few typo's. Julie, Gerald and I will be present. Talk to you then....
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: Doc's for conference call
I'm looking at the Skelton option (Hart County, GA), and can't figure out when it was executed. (must confess I didn't read EVERY word) Can anyone help me with this? Thanks,
Answer: Skelton option
Q: A couple of additional thoughts on this morning's conversation: 1. if we really think the next 6 or 8 months will sort out the takeaway and receipt point capacity issues, why not bet the whole farm and try to hold onto the whole 150 mm/d until next winter or fall and see if the perceived value goes up? We could tell Calpine "no" on their bid and hold them off for several months "negotiating" if that's what we thought would lead to the best value. I don't personally think this would be a prudent approach, but its where our logic leads in the extreme, so we'd better be prepared to explain why getting the bird in the hand from Calpine is smart. 2. We'll research the question of whether we can reject any recourse bids that come in over the next 6-8 months if we decide to hold onto the 60 mm/d for awhile. I've thought about it a bit more and I'm pretty sure you're not going to like the answer. First, FERC says we've got to have a recourse rate in place for all capacity, new or old. One reason is that there needs to be a max rate that applies to long term capacity releases. We have the option on new projects to go with the existing max tariff rate or a new incrementally designed rate. We are going with the existing tariff rate on RedRock. Fine, but that makes the existing rate the recourse rate for all purposes. FERC's logic will be that TW could sell all of the RedRock capacity at recourse rates (currently $.38) and never suffer a revenue shortfall even if future rate cases reduce TW's overall rates, because the costs of all TW's facilities--including the new project--will be considered
Propose a subject line
A:
RedRock