Problem: Officials from TAG Heuer have announced that the company received the iF product design award, which was given away by the jury from the International Forum Design. TAG Heuer received the award for its concept watch, called Monaco Calibre 360 (Linear Second) Concept Chronograph. The jury that gives away the iF product design awards each year consists of leading design experts from all over the world gathered in one place. The iF awards are presented in Hanover, Germany, at the International Forum Design Hannover GMBH. There are a number of fields and disciplines which have their own awards.

Based on the paragraph above can we conclude that "The iF awards are not in Warsaw."? OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No

A: Yes
Q: Congress grants rights to improve lives
It isn't inconsistent, I submit, Justice Stevens, for the Congress to exercise its juris -- its responsibility under this broad grant of power to determine that there could be many ways in which the holder of an existing right may benefit the public by continuing to have that right for an additional period of time, the same reason that Congress -- same reasons that Congress had when it created the right in the first place. It's not just the right --
OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No
A: It's impossible to say
Steam or smoke is seen pouring from the open manhole in Old Street in a shocking video taken at the scene. A pile of rubble is by the manhole cover as shocked witnesses gather at the scene. One person can be heard saying: "It exploded!" Another can be says: "What the f**k! Oh my God." A third said: "That was scary. Did anyone get hurt?"
Old Street was one street over from the actual scene of the accident OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No
A: No
input hypothesis: The narrator is talking to a woman
Context: What I've done is, it says that there's no extraneous unpublished material questioning. That's the clarity that I need. And then, quite frankly, my mindset is, if the issue of the defendants is that we were biased in our reporting because we either misquoted somebody or whatever, well, this isn't a jury trial.
OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No
true or false: It's impossible to say
Context:
He consults with his own legal counsel and he is told if he says yes, there is a problem because he will be perceived to have taken a position that is intimidating the employees and therefore that position will be used to justify certifying a union even when less than the majority of the employees support doing so.
Hypothesis: He won't consult with legal counsel. OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No
No
Problem: The act provides that it is necessary to obtain the consent of the attorney general before instituting proceedings in respect of an offence when it is alleged that the injuries that caused death were sustained more than three years before death, or in cases where the accused has already been found guilty of an offence related to the death.

Based on the paragraph above can we conclude that "The attorney general is a woman."? OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No

A:
It's impossible to say