input question: uh Texas has got it rigged to where i can't shoot the guy can enter my property and i can't shoot him but once he's physically inside my house uh the law reads to where you can defend yourself if you feel your life is being threatened yeah at two o'clock in the morning if somebody's in my living room i feel real threatened so i'm going to come out with guns blazing If this premise is true, does that tell us:"I can shoot people if they enter my house."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: yes

Question:
Based on the premise "Visitors without access to an automobile seeking a similar view should walk out through the San Martin neighborhood, west of the old Jewish quarter, over the San Martin bridge (which dates to 1203), behind which Toledo rises dramatically on the hill.", can we conclude that "You can walk through the San Martin neighborhood for a similar view."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
yes

Question: Sentence A: At the very northern tip of the Sinai is Taba, with several large hotels, marking the Egyptian/Israeli border.

Sentence B: Taba's hotels are all very expensive, but have good room service.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question: i know i i know go ahead i'm sorry
Go ahead and tell your story.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Problem: Here is a premise:
Now, a slight disclaimer.

Here is a hypothesis:
There is a disclaimer attached to this stance.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question:
Oh, brilliant.

Does it follow that "Brilliant, because it fits."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
it is not possible to tell