In this task, you must classify if a given review is positive/negative, indicating your answer as P or N.

Example input: plot : two teen couples go to a church party , drink and then drive .
they get into an accident .
one of the guys dies , but his girlfriend continues to see him in her life , and has nightmares .
what 's the deal ?
watch the movie and " sorta " find out . . .
critique : a mind - fuck movie for the teen generation that touches on a very cool idea , but presents it in a very bad package .
which is what makes this review an even harder one to write , since i generally applaud films which attempt to break the mold , mess with your head and such ( lost highway & memento ) , but there are good and bad ways of making all types of films , and these folks just did n't snag this one correctly
.
they seem to have taken this pretty neat concept , but executed it terribly .
so what are the problems with the movie ?
well , its main problem is that it 's simply too jumbled
.
it starts off " normal " but then downshifts into this " fantasy " world in which you , as an audience member ,
have no idea what 's going on
.
there are dreams , there are characters coming back from the dead , there are others who look like the dead , there are strange apparitions , there are disappearances , there are a looooot of chase scenes , there are tons of weird things that happen , and most of it is simply not explained .
now i personally do n't mind trying to unravel a film every now and then , but when all it does is give me the same clue over and over again , i get kind of fed up after a while , which is this film 's biggest problem .
it 's obviously got this big secret to hide , but it seems to want to hide it completely until its final five minutes .
and do they make things entertaining , thrilling or even engaging , in the meantime ?
not really .
the sad part is that the arrow and i both dig on flicks like this , so we actually figured most of it out by the half - way point , so all of the strangeness after that did start to make a little bit of sense , but it still did n't the make the film all that more entertaining .
i guess the bottom line with movies like this is that you should always make sure that the audience is " into it " even before they are given the secret password to enter your world of understanding .
i mean , showing melissa sagemiller running away from visions for about 20 minutes throughout the movie is just plain lazy ! !
okay , we get it .
. .
there are people chasing her and we do n't know who they are .
do we really need to see it over and over again ?
how about giving us different scenes offering further insight into all of the strangeness going down in the movie ?
apparently , the studio took this film away from its director and chopped it up themselves , and it shows .
there might 've been a pretty decent teen mind - fuck movie in here somewhere , but i guess " the suits " decided that turning it into a music video with little edge , would make more sense .
the actors are pretty good for the most part , although wes bentley just seemed to be playing the exact same character that he did in american beauty , only in a new neighborhood .
but my biggest kudos go out to sagemiller , who holds her own throughout the entire film , and actually has you feeling her character 's unraveling .
overall , the film does n't stick
because it does n't entertain , it 's confusing , it rarely excites and
it feels pretty redundant for most of its runtime , despite a pretty cool ending and explanation to all of the craziness that came before it .
oh ,
and by the way , this is not a horror or teen slasher flick . . .
it 's just packaged to look that way because someone is apparently assuming that the genre is still hot with the kids .
it also wrapped production two years ago and has been sitting on the shelves ever since .
whatever . .
. skip it !
where 's joblo coming from ?
a nightmare of elm street 3 ( 7/10 ) - blair witch 2 ( 7/10 ) - the crow ( 9/10 ) - the crow : salvation ( 4/10 )
- lost highway ( 10/10 ) - memento ( 10/10 ) - the others ( 9/10 ) - stir of echoes ( 8/10 )
Example output: N
Example explanation: The phrases used in the review convey a negative sentiment (e.g. "presents it in a very bad package").
Q: fantastically over hyped , godzila finally lumbers onto the big screen .
the film opens with footage of nuclear testing on the french polynesian islands , then an attack on a boat from some beast , and finally we join dr .
nick tatopoulos ( broderick looking about 17 years old ) doing some research in chernobyl .
some shady u .
s
government guys appear , and ask him to come to an island where they have massive footprints , from what looks like a giant lizard .
and what 's more , this beast is heading for new york .
gulp !
although godzilla should be a non stop roller coaster ride , and at some points it is , there is something curiously uninvolving and unexciting about this movie .
the main faults lie with the acting and writing , common problems with ' summer blockbuster ' movies .
broderick is pretty useless as the hero , with no humour or a ' tough guy ' image .
while emmerich 's previous summer flick , independence day ( 1996 ) had wisecracks and action from jeff goldblum and will smith , this has neither .
also , maria pitillo , as broderick 's former girlfriend , is just as useless , with a chronic disability in acting .
she 's incapable of showing emotion , speaks every line in the same way , and
basically she 's total crap .
it 's up to french actor jean reno to save the day , and indeed he does , turning in a campy performance as a french secret agent .
shame he has such little screen time in such a overlong film
.
hank azaria also turns up as a crazy cameraman named ' animal ' , and he adds a little life to the picture . also making an appearance is harry shearer ( probably best know for doing voices in the simpsons ) as a slimy news reporter .
o .
k , so the acting is not up to par , but it never is in these movies .
but what about the script ?
well , that 's not up to par either .
emmerich and screenwriting pal dean devlin seem
so caught in the destruction of new york city that they forgot to write a script .
the dialogue is banal
( broderick looks at a lot of fish and utters ' that 's a lot of fish . ' ) , and the character development is non existent
( reno plays the typical frenchman ( ' no croissant ? ' ) , broderick forever remains a geeky scientist . )
also , the film is seriously lacking a sense of humour .
the jokes that are uttered are pathetic , and there 's an ' hilarious ' running gag about siskel and ebert .
( the mayor is mayor ebert , and is assistant is called gene !
ha ha ha ha ! .
) the plot is dire , and in the end just rips off jurassic park ( 1993 ) by having lots of baby godzilla 's
( i .
e . velicorapters ) running around new york .
right , so the script and acting suck .
but what about the special effects ?
thankfully , they 're are quite good .
godzilla is an impressive piece of cgi , although we do n't see much of him because the movie is so dark .
the destruction of new york is pretty well done aswell .
but although they are impressive , they ca n't save godzilla from being an hugely disappointing and boring movie .
the movie goes on for far too long aswell , and it ca n't seem to decide on a ending .
and of course , the ending itself leaves possibility for a sequel .
let 's just hope one never arrives .
A:
N