In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

Ex Input:
Comment: Black people cry racism every chance they get. It's pathetic.

Ex Output:
Identity-attack

Ex Input:
Comment: Lying Red Rag. You win this one, but your hero Hillary is still going to prison. As should all you islamists.

Ex Output:
Identity-attack

Ex Input:
Comment: Do you think Charles is fabricating or exaggerating the difficulties faced by a Black during the Jim Crow period, or do you just wish he wouldn't talk about it? Do you maybe believe 'it wasn't so bad'? Why wouldn't a person subjected to that be forever skeptical of whites' intentions. The days Blacks could not be secure in their homes, when they could be attacked on a whim, seem to be coming back, and our president seems complicit. If you are as you say a lawyer with the intelligence that implies, why do you put out comments so obviously tone deaf?

Ex Output:
Identity-attack