TASK DEFINITION: In this task, you're given a review from Amazon's food products. Your task is to generate a short summary of the given review in the input. Note that you don't need to write a complete sentence as a summary.
PROBLEM: I bought a case of this stuff (Dark Chocolate) based on the positive reviews. Big mistake. This is half a step above Swiss Miss. It is definitely not up to the level of Archer (Target brand), Twinings (some grocery stores), or Cadbury (overseas or very few grocery stores). Cocoa is the 4th ingredient. No chocolate as an ingredient. Bunch of fats and fillers. Archer has cocoa as the second ingredient and chocolate as the 4th and 5th ingredient. That's more like it. Stephen's chocolate has bad/very light color, little aroma, thin, doesn't dissolve. A very disappointing purchase.

SOLUTION: Not a gourmet product

PROBLEM: After finding out two of our family members have celiac disease, we had to give up licorice and cherry nibs. Candy Tree's Organic Cherry Bites have no sugar and truly rival the cherry nibs with gluten. After a year of not having the "real thing" my husband believes Candy Tree's are actually better.

SOLUTION: Better than cherry nibs (the ones with gluten)

PROBLEM: Neat concept. Other contraptions to use your own coffee have prepunched holes and are designed much differently than the K-Cup. This is like a do it yourself K-Cup. However, because this consists of a disposable cup, filter, and a cap and is punched by the brewer, I would not be surprised if this mechanism infringed on Keurig's patents. Oh, and the video review submitted by the other reviewer looks suspiciously like the video on the manufacturers website :)

SOLUTION:
Neat concept