Problem: Here is a premise:
How will we use that information to make improvements?

Here is a hypothesis:
Improvements can be made to the situation.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Sentence 1: Montreuil's churches are all noteworthy ' particularly Saint-Saulve, which dates in part from the 13th century ' but most visitors spend their time exploring the town's cobbled streets and medieval alleyways.

Sentence 2: Saint-Saulve dates in part from the 10th century, and is vastly popular amongst tourists.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: no

Question:
After years of being hounded by paparazzi , the Kennedys and their guests reportedly exulted in their escape.

Does it follow that "The Kennedys exulted in the escape of paparazzi."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
yes

Q: If took authority and they cut and they stab and and our nation does that a lot too i know it's not necessarily i don't think this is the greatest system either but i just feel like there's just a lot of oppression over the Soviet Union because of that the authority is there to exalt self that's the whole Leninist theology they deny God they deny any creator they've, can we say that "There is too much oppression in this country."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A: it is not possible to tell

Premise:
"I asked for their names."
Hypothesis: I already knew their names.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

no

Sentence 1: This agreement, which gave the Serbs a great deal more than Vance-Owen would have, was puffed as a Nobel-worthy diplomatic accomplishment.

Sentence 2: That agreement gave the Serbs a lot less than Vance-Owen would have.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer:
no