What was the question for this implicit rationale, and corresponding answer?
The man in the red outfit cannot be fighting another man and standing in front of him simultaneously.
The answer: no
The question: Premise: "The man is wearing a red outfit and red mask stands in front of another man in urban camouflage."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A man in a red outfit fights a man in urban camouflage." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no