Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.

Q: Major colleges do because they draw over 50,ooo people per game for many football games and they get huge amounts of TV money. UAA hockey used to bring in enough to cover their costs and supply some money for other sports as well. They no longer bring in big money. On top of that , even with UAA students given free tickets and transportation to many events , around 90 percent don't even attend to support their own school. The UAA sports budget is around 10. 5 million a year , and they are trying to cut around 1.7 million. The ski team , track team , and gymnastic's teams should be cut without delay---for starters . The Shootout should be canceled after this year . My guess , and it's only a guess---is that all of UAA's sports teams draw around 500 grand total from all ticket sales from all the sports. Put another way---concerts held at the new sports arena do ten times better than all of UAA's sports teams put together .

A: No
****
Q: I'm glad to see that Jenkins now professes to have a PHD in psychiatry. If tRump gets elected, he's gonna need to make use of his tRump "University" degree for self therapy every day. Like tRump, Jenkins and his kind are TOTAL FRAUDS. If he had any backbone or any inkling of what party, projects the core principles that he tries to espouse every week, he would be voting Libertarian.

A: Yes
****
Q: I had similar thoughts back when the Republicans first started splitting hairs and playing word games with "endorse" and "support". Do they really not understand that they are one and the same? Pretty crazy for national politicians. Sounds a lot like the local political rhetoric from our very own legislative majority. (Meyers' "deer in the headlights" look and subsequent comments about the $100.00 lobbyist dinner, as an example)

A:
No
****