Detailed Instructions: Generate an explanation for the given claim using the provided supporting material from the paragraph. Please consider the following points while generating an output. 1) The claim will always have supporting proof in the paragraph, and the paragraph will have a clear point of view supporting the claim. 2) There can be instances where direct correlation to the claim is not available. Make use of the sentences in the paragraph to provide a corresponding output supporting the claim. 3) The explanation should be at least one and at most twelve sentences long.
See one example below:
Problem: Paragraph: "Although the story didn't cite the cost of appendectomy emergency or urgent surgery and we wish it had, we nonetheless will give it a satisfactory score because it at least cited what the editorial writer wrote, ""A secondary benefit is the savings to the hospital generated by minimizing staff and anesthesiologist presence late in the evening and during the wee hours of the morning."" As with our harms score above, although the story didn't give absolute numbers, in this case we think it was sufficient for it to report that ""The scientists found no significant difference among the groups in the patients' condition 30 days after surgery or in the length of their operation or hospital stay."" Although the story didn't give absolute numbers, in this case we think it was sufficient for it to report that ""The scientists found no significant difference among the groups in the patients' condition 30 days after surgery or in the length of their operation or hospital stay."" Despite running less than 300 words, this story did an adequate job in explaining the quality of the evidence, including pointing out limitations. No disease-mongering here. The story meets the bare minimum requirement for this criterion in that it at least cited what an editorial stated. The focus of the story was on a study comparing emergency appendectomy with surgery done up to 12 hours later or beyond. This is the whole focus of the story and one we applaud when it begins: ""Appendectomy is the most common emergency surgery in the world, but it doesn't have to be."" There were no claims made about the novelty of this research, and we may have wished for a bit more context on this. Nonetheless, the potential for guiding future care decisions was made clear. Not applicable. Given that the story only pulled excerpts from the journal article and the accompanying editorial, and didn't include any fresh quotes from interviews, we can't be sure of the extent to which it may have been influenced by a news release.". Claim: Some appendicitis cases may not require 'emergency' surgery
Solution: We really don't understand why only a handful of mainstream news organizations reported this story. (At least in what we found.) The most common emergency surgery in the world. Rushing to emergency surgery may not carry any benefit. Waiting a few hours may be safer and less expensive. Why is that not a story? We applaud USA Today for finding time and space and clearly it didn't need to free up much space to do a good job telling the story. The story explains that as many as 300,0 appendectomies are done each year in the US. That figure alone explains why this is an important study to report.
Explanation: The output is an analysis of the claim while considering the paragraph as a reference. The output highlights the key features presented in the paragraph and explains the claim accordingly.

Problem: Paragraph: The breakout of COVID-19 not only altered plans to promote the book but also kept him home from work. "General Hospital" stopped production March 15. The ABC show recently began airing four new shows a week with flashbacks edited in to pad the episodes; Benard believes the show has enough material to get through mid-May. "It's a very hard time and people are thrown from their routines or they're alone in isolation," said Benard, 57, in a recent interview from his Los Angeles home. "I'm having anxiety and last week I had it horribly. It's weird for me. I need to act." Benard says even though routines are altered, people shouldn't pause their commitment to taking care of themselves: "You can't let that stop you from working out and eating well. You've got to stay out of your thoughts because that's where the demon is." Benard has won a Daytime Emmy Award for his portrayal of Sonny Corinthos, a mobster who is beloved by his friends and family and feared by his enemies. His illness has been incorporated into his character's story, which Benard calls "so nice." "It tells people, you know, Sonny is bipolar and Sonny can function. If Sonny can do it, then I can do it," he said. His book, written with Susan Black, was born out of posting Sunday check-ins on social media about how he was feeling: "You've got to talk about it because if you hold it in, you will explode." Both in the book and in his interview, Benard credits his wife and manager, Paula, for guiding him through his low points. "My wife is the one who, during the panic attacks or the harder times, has that calming voice, who makes everything much easier." Benard has been on "General Hospital" for 25 years. This would naturally put him in a leadership position with his co-stars, but he says that wasn't always the case because he wasn't always approachable. "I've changed in the last five years. I used to be kind of tough. I think getting older, having a little more wisdom made something change in me," he said. "Everybody's noticed. What a great feeling to not feel ugliness inside." Chad Duell, who plays his son Michael, said in an email to the AP: "He definitely has helped me grow as an actor, and he always brings out the best of me when I am working with him." "I loved working with Mo. He elevated my performance every time," added Bryan Craig, who played another one of his sons, also via email. Benard said he relishes working with the younger actors on the show. "I love taking the young actors under my wing, especially when they're talented. The young actors are winning Emmys," he said. "At this point in my life I'm more proud of what they do than what I do." ____ Follow Alicia Rancilio at http://www.twitter.com/aliciar Claim: Soap star Benard says quarantine hard on his mental health.
Solution:
Longtime "General Hospital" star Maurice Benard says sheltering in place can take its toll on your mental health. The actor is open about suffering from bipolar disorder and also writes about it in his new best-selling book, "Nothing General About It: How Love (And Lithium) Saved Me On and Off General Hospital."