QUESTION: John, How do you want me to handle pmt back to Greg for your return leg on Travel Air from the Super Bowl. Greg mentioned that Enron may be picking up the bill for you. If yes, just advise and I'll do up the payment request. The total charges are $3,621.50. Many Thanks, Liz
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: Flight back from Super Bowl
As of today, we have e:mailed a list by station ( 7 and/or 16 day charts) t= o the Measurement Group that need to be read for PPA's to correct the daily= volumes for the following shippers: MidAmerican - 147 stations - to date, Measurement has corrected 44 stations IES - 87 stations Interstate Power - 6 stations Wisconsin Power & Light - 11 stations In order for us to keep track of the ones that need to be corrected, we wou= ld like for Measurement to send us updates as to what station numbers have = or haven't been done. We would also like to make sure that they have even = received all of these October, 2001 charts by December 14 and if they haven= 't, we would like to know which ones they are so that we could help by call= ing the field personnel to get those charts in ASAP and also, if we could d= o that for them, then they could continue to input the corrected readings w= hile we chase down the charts they are missing. We have given Measurement = a date of January 3, 2002 (which is the last time that we run prior periods= ) for the date that we would like to have all of these done, but the sooner= they get those done, the better because we would like to have plenty of ti= me to review them and make sure that they are correct. To make that happen= , it would help us if they could be done by December 19, which will be the = first time that we run prior periods. If we wait until the January 3rd dat= e, we will only have 1 day to check these invoices to make sure that they a= re all correct. Lynn/Rick, I think that Jodie and I need your help in conveying this to Mea= surement along with copying all of the other people that have been involved= with this to make sure that they (Meas.) know the importance of getting th= is done. We are depending solely on them to get this accomplished for us a= nd we just want to make sure that they read all of the stations that we sen= t them because we want to avoid doing multiple priors on the same months pr= oduction. Please let us know if you need any other information. Thanks,
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: Draft to Measurement
EBF LLC This limited liability company was formed in Delaware on May 22, 2001. Particulars are: Parent Company: Enron North America Corp. - 100% Business: To acquire, own, operate, maintain and sell a cold rolled mill steel processing plant and all related land improvement and tangible and intangible properties. Employees: No Foreign Qualifications: Arkansas Company No. : 1621-EBFL Information not yet confirmed by LLC Agreement. Please circulate this information to all interested parties in your group. For more information, see attached Corporate Data Sheet. Sundance Industrial Partners, L.P. This limited partnership was formed in Delaware on May 7, 2001. Particulars are: Parent Company: GP - Enron Industrial Markets GP Corp. LP - Enron North America Corp. Business: To acquire and hold certain pulp and paper, steel and/or other assets.. Employees: No Foreign Qualifications: None Company No. : 1611-SIPL Information not yet confirmed by LP Agreement. Please circulate this information to all interested parties in your group. For more information, see attached Corporate Data Sheet. PLEASE NOTE: Gina Karathanos - copy of evidence being sent by interoffice mail Monica Butler - please apply for FEIN Sylvia Hu - Minute Book and two seals have been ordered Lillian R. Bailey Administrator Corporate Services EB4804A Phone 713/853-3577 Fax 713/646-8007 lillian.bailey@enron.com
Answer: EWS-ENA Group - New Formations (2)
Here is an email: There is a file under Netco for all currently unused books, rolls and hedge strips. O:\erms\erms_adm\netco\unused books. Rather than deleting these, they will remain here until they are needed. The NGP&L will link to these, once they are needed we will start saving it to the regions file and the links will be updated. There is also a hedgestrip saved for each book to the live and unused books files. We should also start creating a common file for each region to post the P&L to the website. Let's try to keep these the same format. East has a good file that shows new deals and curveshift. West used a macro to pull in finished P&L's instead of updating links which eliminated some problems, Randy could help with this. Figure out what format you want and use that for all regions. I think everyone agrees that we don't want to give them a positions file like in the past, they should use TDS for that. I believe the TRV website should be ready to go tomorrow so we can set up the users and report #'s then. KK
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: unused books
Here is an email: Rick 1 Limits. Here's how I interpreted the BOD approvals: The BOD approved an aggregate of $150MM, with $50MM of discretionary VaR, plus the new policy which doesn't recognise the concept of discretionary VaR. So here's what I did: Effectively I allocated all the $50MM of discretionary such that Pug's "Big Buckets" are now as follows: US Gas $100MM US Elec $100MM Europe Gas & Elec $35MM Global Products $20MM Financials $15MM Emerging Businesses $20MM If you have a calculator handy you'll see that this aggregates to $149.164MM (assuming zero correlation). At Business Unit level the individual commodity limits are unchanged, and I have put limits over the Business Units themselves as follows: Enron Americas $82MM EWS OOC (aka George Martingale) $3MM EEL $34MM EGM $23MM EIM $8MM EBS $4MM PGE $4MM ETS $1MM Again I used root-sum-of-squares, and remember the original commodity limits (by VaR, net open and mat gap) are still in place (e.g. gas = $61MM as before). So that keeps it screwed down pretty tight and preserves the discretion between the "Big Buckets" and the Business Units. I spoke to Rebecca C who could only remember the decision outlined above, but offered to call Pug and let him know. I said I would come back on that. I think we should do that ourselves, possibly with Lay in the loop (?). Cleared it with Whalley today (he laughed), mentioned the dwindling membership of the Risk Management Committee and said "In my current role I think I should be asking for limits, not approving them" ...and then... 2 The gas desk lost $98MM yesterday A combination of a very bullish AGA number (3 Bcf injection - not a typo - three Bcf !) plus some hurricane activity in the gulf sent prices up by between 25 and 30c all across the strip. The long and the short of it was we are long Nov - Jan but short (big-time) out beyond that - the rest is arithmetic. So we have two flavors of P&L notification, one at the business unit level (Americas) $89MM loss against VaR limit of $82MM; the other as a commodity, losing $126MM (the desk aren't the only ones with a gas position, as usual) against the Big Bucket number of $100MM. Total trading was a loss of $106MM against a VaR limit of $150MM so no calls to Pug required (thank goodness). That's it for now, hope you're having fun and remember: pan-fry the big ones and throw back the little ones. DP
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A:
Policy and other items