[QUESTION] Given the sentence "A man dressed in blue pants and a blue shirt poses in an alleyway with a camera and a piece of paper." can we conclude that "A man dressed in blue pants and a blue shirt is eating lunch."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
The man can't be eating lunch and poising in an alleyway at the same time.
The answer is no.

Q: Premise: "A black-haired swimmer in a pool."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A swimmer in a pool prepares for a race." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A: Just because a swimmer is in the pool it does not mean they prepares for a race.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

QUESTION: Premise: "Three people sailing on very blue waters."
Hypothesis: "Three people have a picnic on the beach."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?

Let's solve it slowly: One cannot be on a beach and on waters at the same time.
The answer is no.

[QUESTION] Can we conclude from "A nondescript woman is standing on a sidewalk backdropped by a predominantly red double-decker bus." that "The woman is standing next to a big red bus."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
A woman can be standing on a sidewalk and not be standing next to a bus.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

Q: Premise: "A pink ball is being held up before three dogs on a beach."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "The dogs want to play." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A: Just because a ball is held up doesn't mean they want to play.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

[QUESTION] Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "Young boys running on grass."
Hypothesis: "The boys are indoors on a rainy day."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
Young boys running on grass instead of being indoors on a rainy day.
The answer is no.