Answer the questions at the end based on the text.

CHAPTER IV

Elizabeth paused for breath at the top of the third flight of stairs. She leaned against the iron balustrade.

"You poor dear!" she exclaimed. "How many times a day did you have to do this?"

"I didn't go out very often," he reminded her, "and it wasn't every day that the lift was out of order. It's only one more flight."

She looked up the stairs, sighed, and raised her smart, grey, tailor-made skirt a little higher over her shoes.

"Well," she announced heroically, "lead on. If they would sometimes dust these steps--but, after all, it doesn't matter to you now, does it? Fancy that poor girl, though."

He smiled a little grimly.

"A few flights of stairs aren't the worst things she has had to face, I'm afraid," he said.

"I am rather terrified of her," Elizabeth confided, supporting herself by her companion's shoulder. "I think I know that ultra-independent type. Kick me if I put my foot in it. Is this the door?"

Philip nodded and knocked softly. There was a sharp "Come in!"

"Put the key down, please," the figure at the typewriter said, as they entered.

The words had scarcely left Martha's lips before she turned around, conscious of some other influence in the room. Philip stepped forward.

"Miss Grimes," he said, "I have brought Miss Dalstan in to see you. She wants--"

He paused. Something in the stony expression of the girl who had risen to her feet and stood now facing them, her ashen paleness unrelieved by any note of colour, her hands hanging in front of her patched and shabby frock, seemed to check the words upon his lips. Her voice was low but not soft. It seemed to create at once an atmosphere of anger and resentment.

1. Did Elizabeth need to pause for breath?
2. Where?
3. What's it made of?
4. Who's she with?
5. Is she used to physical exertion?
6. What's she wearing on her legs?
7. Was it made just for her?
8. What color is it?
9. Why are they having to climb the stairs, today?
10. How many flights of stairs are there in total?
11. What does Elizabeth wish someone would do to the steps?

Numbered answers:

A: 1. yes
2. top of the third flight of stairs
3. iron balustrade
4. Philip
5. No
6. skirt
7. Yes
8. grey
9. the lift was out of order.
10. Four
11. dust these steps

Question: Morality (from the Latin "" "manner, character, proper behavior") is the differentiation of intentions, decisions and actions between those that are distinguished as proper and those that are improper. Morality can be a body of standards or principles derived from a code of conduct from a particular philosophy, religion or culture, or it can derive from a standard that a person believes should be universal. Morality may also be specifically synonymous with "goodness" or "rightness".

Moral philosophy includes moral ontology, or the origin of morals, as well as moral epistemology, or knowledge of morals. Different systems of expressing morality have been proposed, including deontological ethical systems which adhere to a set of established rules, and normative ethical systems which consider the merits of actions themselves. An example of normative ethical philosophy is the Golden Rule, which states that: "One should treat others as one would like others to treat oneself."

Immorality is the active opposition to morality (i.e. opposition to that which is good or right), while amorality is variously defined as an unawareness of, indifference toward, or disbelief in any particular set of moral standards or principles.

Ethics (also known as moral philosophy) is the branch of philosophy which addresses questions of morality. The word "ethics" is "commonly used interchangeably with 'morality,' and sometimes it is used more narrowly to mean the moral principles of a particular tradition, group, or individual." Likewise, certain types of ethical theories, especially deontological ethics, sometimes distinguish between ethics and morals: "Although the morality of people and their ethics amounts to the same thing, there is a usage that restricts morality to systems such as that of Immanuel Kant, based on notions such as duty, obligation, and principles of conduct, reserving ethics for the more Aristotelian approach to practical reasoning, based on the notion of a virtue, and generally avoiding the separation of 'moral' considerations from other practical considerations." 1. where does the word morality come from?
2. Latin words that mean what?
3. what word is used interchangeably with morality?
4. what is that known as?
5. are ethics and morality mostly the same?
6. what is morality restricted to?
7. based on what?
8. what approach are ethics reserved for?
9. influenced by who?
10. based on what concept? Provide a numbered list of answers.
****
A numbered of answers: 1. from the Latin
2. manner, character, proper behavior
3. ethics
4. moral philosophy
5. yes
6. to systems such as that of Immanuel Kant
7. on notions such as duty, obligation, and principles of conduct,
8. practical reasoning
9. Aristotelian
10. the notion of a virtue

Q: New Delhi (CNN) -- An Indian court has ruled that the organizer of the scandal-plagued 2010 Commonwealth Games in New Delhi is forbidden from attending the opening ceremony of the London Olympics.

The presence at the ceremony of Suresh Kalmadi, who was arrested last year on corruption charges related to the Commonwealth Games, would be "contrary to national interest," the High Court of Delhi said Wednesday.

The legal action seeking to restrict Kalmadi's movements was filed after a different court had authorized him to travel to London. He had sought permission for the trip in order to attend meetings of the International Association of Athletics Federations.

The Delhi high court allowed him to go ahead with his visit. But it said he couldn't leave India until Friday, the day of the opening ceremony, and should honor a pledge not to attend any Olympic events "in any official capacity."

Kalmadi still holds a number of high-profile sports administrative roles, including the presidency of the Indian Olympic Association.

In a statement, he said he was "never planning to attend" the opening ceremony and had never sought permission to do so.

The petitioner who brought the litigation, Rahul Mehra, said Kalmadi's presence at the Olympics would be "extremely embarrassing" for the athletes and India. Mehra described himself as a "patriotic citizen of the country."

The Indian government also is not in favor of Kalmadi attending the Olympics while he still faces corruption charges, according to the text of the high court's judgment.

The 2010 Commonwealth Games, which India had hoped would burnish its image as a rising economic power, was marred by accusations of graft, missed construction deadlines and cost overruns.

1. Yes
2. Suresh Kalmadi
3. Attending the opening ceremony of the London Olympics
4. He was the organizer of the scandal-plagued 2010 Commonwealth Games
5. New Delhi
6. Yes
7. Last year
8. Corruption charges
9. No
10. He said he was never planning to attend
11. The Indian government
12. Because he still faces corruption charges
13. The 2010 Commonwealth Games would burnish its image as a rising economic power
14. No
15. It was marred by accusations of graft, missed construction deadlines and cost overruns

Numbered questions:
1. Did someone get banned?
2. Who?
3. From what?
4. Why?
5. Where were those held?
6. Was he incarcerated?
7. When?
8. For what?
9. Did he confirm he was going?
10. What did he say?
11. Who else offered an opinion on this?
12. Why not?
13. What did India hope?
14. Did that happen?
15. What actually happened?