Could we then go back to Justice O'Connor's question? To make that very specific, if we agree with you, does that mean that we would, in principle, have to hold the 1976 extension unconstitutional? I mean, in 1976, Congress extended the term from 28 years renewable once, to life of the author plus 50 years. Now they're extending it life of the author plus 70. If the latter is unconstitutional on your theory, how could the former not be? And if the former is, the chaos that would ensue would be horrendous.
Arguments are being made in the supreme court OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No
A: It's impossible to say

TOKYO, Dec 18 (Reuters) - Japan's Shionogi & Co said on Tuesday that it has applied to health regulators in the United States, Canada and Europe for approval of its HIV drug Dolutegravir. Shionogi developed Dolutegravir with a Viiv Healthcare, an AIDS drug joint venture between GlaxoSmithKline and Pfizer, in exchange for its rights to the drug.
There are a lot of drug companies in the United States. OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No
A: It's impossible to say

There 's old Mrs. Warner at the Channel Head .<br>She 's had heaps of trouble all her life , poor soul , and she 's lost almost everyone she cared about .<br>She 's always saying that she 'll be glad when her time comes , and she does n't want to live any longer in this vale of tears .
Vale of Tears is a street at Channel Head. OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No
A:
It's impossible to say