Categorize the comment on the basis of toxicity. If the comment is toxic (harmful, malicious, derogatory, threat, insult, identity attck, etc.) output Yes, otherwise output No.

Example Input: This seems to be pulled from the EPD blog, probably simply because of the cutesy news angle because the attacker is named Peace: https://www.eugene-or.gov/CivicAlerts.aspx?AID=2490. Not that it excuses the attack, but it would be nice to know if this was a random attack or if the two knew each other, perhaps the victim incited him somehow. Camping on his usual spot? We don't even know if the victim was male or female.
Example Output: No

Example Input: US laws can't protect school children, college student, shoppers, diners, movie-goers. The deranged have targeted gay people throughout history. Harvey Milk, Roxanne Ellis and Michelle Abdill, Matthew Shepard. In 1973, thirty two people died as a result of arson in a gay night club in New Orleans. The gayness factor didn't make the news then. It appears that Mateen, as others have been, was driven by his hatred of gays. There always has been some hatred-fueled act of violence against some group perceived to be a threat: witches, pagans, indigenous people, Jews, homeless, the ex-wife's family. Where do people develop such a deep seated loathing?
Example Output: No

Example Input: Afraid your boss has fed you some erroneous talking points. The demo leadership controlled the aca poop from start to finish. It was them that killed the single payer under pressure of the lobbiests writing the bill for them. Don't put out lies. I realize the demo mantra is say it enough and it will become the truth but America is sick and tired of your crap. That's why you have hate and dicontent in your and the republican ranks this cycle. Now who controlled the house and senate and Whitey house when you passed the aca? Explain Russ, how the repubs stopped anything.
Example Output:
Yes