[QUESTION] Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "A child is bowling in an alley with one pin left standing."
Hypothesis: "The child just threw a strike and there are no pins remaining that are still standing."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
There cannot be one pin standing of no pins remain standing.
The answer is no.

Q: Premise: "Three boys playing on computers."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "Three young boys play madden football on computers." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A: Because boys are playing on computers does not mean they are playing madden football.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

QUESTION: Given the sentence "A little boy attempts to fix his bike." is it true that "A boy standing near a broken bike."?

Let's solve it slowly: Attempts to fix implies effort while standing near implies not effort to fix the bike at all.
The answer is no.

[QUESTION] Given the sentence "A redheaded woman eats a tortilla chip." can we conclude that "A woman eats a chip that she just made."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Not all woman eats a tortilla chip that she just made.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

Q: Given the sentence "Children sporting their florida dolphin caps." is it true that "Kids don't have caps."?
A: Youth in general can be defined by the label children or kids. Either can or cannot wear caps.
The answer is no.

[QUESTION] Given the sentence "People stand in front of artwork on the streets of an asian city." can we conclude that "People are watching television."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
People watching television can't be standing in front of artwork on the streets.
The answer is no.