Question: Sentence A: Generators respond by gradually reducing their emissions - reducing more than the cap requires early in the program in order to save allowances for use later in the program when the caps decline.

Sentence B: When the caps decline, the generators increase their emissions.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question: You are nice to weigh in as a Prudie.
You are horrible to weigh in as a Prudie.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Problem: Here is a premise:
You wouldn't have a chance.

Here is a hypothesis:
The odds would be in your favor.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Sentence 1: that's an excellent movie

Sentence 2: That movie was fantastic.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: yes

Question:
RAPS4 must be further tested as a stand-alone screen in isolation and against other tests.

Does it follow that "RAPS4 must be tested in isolation before it can be tried against other driving tests. "?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
it is not possible to tell

Question:
Based on the premise "It added, Signs of weakness will not be overlooked by the market, which exploits every little blunder to its advantage.", can we conclude that "The market does not overlook signs of weakness. "? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
yes