Categorize the comment on the basis of severe toxicity. If the comment is severely toxic output Yes, otherwise output No.

Q: I would be more sympathetic to the city's anti-car strategy if it would divest itself of its fleet of city cars. Personal transportation for citizens is often related to the demands of work and family. If citizens are expected to rely on public transit or bicycle, let city employees do the same.

A: No
****
Q: Ah, I don't know about the "far left" [am somewhat unsure what/who you're referring to] but my remark had little to do with "the more popular religions in the US", unless you consider religious sects that post large signs saying "If you worship the Earth, I spit on your Mother", publish comments such as: "Nuke them [Moslems] until they glow; then shoot them in the dark.", call for beheading infidels, or teach that nonbelievers should burn in hell, etc, etc, etc - as outstandingly popular in the US. And I really don't believe that ANYONE [not even most heinous of the "Far Left"] is asking that the straight population "conform" to trans-gender people either - is that even possible?? I don't think so.
Just saying - replying to comment means so much more, if you reply to the comment that posted.

A: Yes
****
Q: I wonder what portion of commenters on here are paid by special interest PR groups to push a specific agenda in the comments. My only complaint is the complete lack of subtlety...I mean come on, romance us, ease us into your rhetoric, don't just beat us over the head with it.

A:
No
****