Sentence 1: A change in ethnic identity is another danger of an overzealous scalpel.

Sentence 2: A change in ethnic identity is unrelated to an overzealous scalpel.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: no

Question:
Felipe II's royal decree was based entirely on the idea being that Madrid, smack in the center of Iberia, would promote centralized authority over regional power bases in a newly unified Spain.

Does it follow that "Felipe had a royal decree about Madrid."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
yes

Q: If There's no count of pro bono contributions of solo practitioners or midsize and small firms., can we say that "They know exactly how many pro bono contributions were made."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A: no

Premise:
"To the south of Chenonceaux, on the Indre river, the medieval village of Loches is as much an attraction as the chateau itself."
Hypothesis: After they take a tour of the chateau, many tourists go to the medieval village of Loches.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

it is not possible to tell

input question: In the great bay where flying fish rise at dusk, sloops and ketches, ferry boats and freighters, cruise ships and fishing boats never have a parking problem. If this premise is true, does that tell us:"In the great bay, ships were not allowed so they would not disturb the natural environment. "?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: no

Q: If You can see the base of the medieval towers in an excavated area of the Cour., can we say that "The base of medieval towers and human remains are visible in an excavated area."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A:
it is not possible to tell