Detailed Instructions: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
See one example below:
Problem: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Solution: Yes
Explanation: The comment suggests threat against Trump and his agendas and classified as threatening. Hence, it is a positive example

Problem: "His own party's leaders realized he'd become a huge impediment and, armed with insider information not available to voters a few months earlier, showed him the door."

Yet more innuendo and insinuation thrown at Kitzhaber. What "insider" info are you referring to? None of you have produced anything that is tangible or concrete in nature. It is all based purely on suspicion. I'm shocked that everyone is being so self-righteous in condemning Kitzhaber, that you cannot see how utterly unfair this is.

McCarthyism: a campaign or practice that endorses the use of unfounded allegations and unfair investigations.

.
Solution:
No