Given a paragraph about movies and a set of conversational questions and answers about the paragraph, say whether the passage contains sufficient information to answer the follow-up question. Say Yes if it is answerable; otherwise, say No. The paragraph has the prefix 'CONTEXT:'. Each conversation question has a prefix 'Q:' followed by the answer prefix 'A:', and the follow-up question has a prefix 'FOLLOWUP_Q:'.
--------
Question: CONTEXT: She doesn't want to torture Sherlock, she wants to play with him. Specifically, she wants him to play with her. At least, that's what the childhood version of herself wants and it manifests in modern day as the torturous puzzling she sets up for Sherlock. Eurus lacks human emotion and, thus, doesn't see what she does as torturing her brother. <sep> Q: What is Eurus's motive in the final problem A: She doesn't want to torture Sherlock, she wants to play with him. Specifically, she wants him to play with her Q: Were they friends as children? A: that's what the childhood version of herself wants and it manifests in modern day as the torturous puzzling she sets up for Sherlock <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Does she kill redbeard?

Answer: Yes

Question: CONTEXT: Because his father taught him not to involve in any (true loving) relationship in their line of work. Nicky knew they both fell truly for each other, so he decide to leave her for the sake of both of them. At the end scene, his father can be seen saying these things, and because of that mistake (losing focus) he took all his earned/stolen money. <sep> Q: Why did Nicky do what he did to Jess in New Orleans? A: Nicky knew they both fell truly for each other, so he decide to leave her for the sake of both of them Q: I still don't understand why he would do that? A: Because his father taught him not to involve in any (true loving) relationship in their line of work Q: Why did his father get involved? A: At the end scene, his father can be seen saying these things, and because of that mistake (losing focus) he took all his earned/stolen money <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Oh, so they were involved in something illegal?

Answer: Yes

Question: CONTEXT: The comment prior to the conversation with the astronauts' wives (in the control center) clearly states that Capricorn 1 is just close enough to Earth to allow the fluent conversation. Only at the most distant point of the mission the conversation gaps reach 21 minutes. Thus, there seems to be no blooper nor plothole. (I am much more worried about the Apollo mission technology used for a journey of at least a year. Could three astronauts just sit in the command module most of the time? I guess even the strongest personalities would have gone mad. There might have been a strong extended/additional stage of a modified Saturn rocket for the outward and return journey. If this stage was equipped with extra rooms, stores etc. it would appear more realistic than what we see in the movie.) <sep> Q: How is the fluent conversation with spacecraft possible in Capricorn One? A: The comment prior to the conversation with the astronauts' wives (in the control center) clearly states that Capricorn 1 is just close enough to Earth to allow the fluent conversation Q: How close was Capricorn One to earth? A: Only at the most distant point of the mission the conversation gaps reach 21 minutes <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Would this work in real life as in the movie? Or would it be too far away to communicate with Earth?

Answer:
Yes