instruction:
In this task, you will be presented with a context from an academic paper and you have to write an answerable question based on the context. Your questions can be extractive, abstractive, or yes-no questions.
question:
We compare our model with two sets of baselines:

MemN2N BIBREF12 is an end-to-end trainable version of memory networks BIBREF9 . Attentive and Impatient Readers BIBREF6 use bidirectional LSTMs to encode question and evidence, and do classification over a large vocabulary based on these two encodings.
answer:
What are the baselines?

question:
Notably, automatic translations of TED talks contain more words than the corresponding reference translation, which means that machine-translated texts of this type have also more potential tokens to enter in a coreference relation, and potentially indicating a shining through effect. The same does not happen with the news test set. We see how NMT translations increase the number of mentions about $30\%$ with respect to human references showing even a more marked explicitation effect than human translations do.
answer:
What translationese effects are seen in the analysis?

question:
Our approach consists of structuring input to the transformer network to use and guide the self-attention of the transformers, conditioning it on the entity. Our main mode of encoding the input, the entity-first method, is shown in Figure FIGREF4. We also have an entity-last variant where the entity is primarily observed just before the classification token to condition the [CLS] token's self-attention accordingly. As an additional variation, we can either run the transformer once per document with multiple [CLS] tokens (a document-level model as shown in Figure FIGREF4) or specialize the prediction to a single timestep (a sentence-level model).
answer:
In what way is the input restructured?