In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: I'm shocked! Shocked, I tell you! Don Young embroiled in yet another ethics problem. Who could have seen this coming?

Output: Agree

Input: Consider Input: Comment: Cultural appropriation is a scam. Nobody owns a culture, and all cultures are continuously changing over time from absorbing bits from other cultures or simply from internally preferences.
The whole point of the cultural appropriation dogma and rhetoric is to wallow in victimhood and to control what others can say and do.

Output: Agree

Input: Consider Input: Comment: There is a stunning paragraph, right here:

"As of December 2016, there were 1,612 filled positions, among which 30 per cent were women. That fits with the fact between 2000 and 2015, 31 per cent of applicants for the jobs were from women."

Hello?

Did I read that correctly?

About 30 percent of the applicant professors were women, and about 30 percent of the chosen recipient professors were women?

Um, where's the sexism?

Or wait, is the sexism sitting there in Ottawa in the Office of the Science Minister, a sexism that is so out-of-control and strong-armed that it wants to throw young male researchers under the bus, in an agenda of bigoted gynophilia?
Output: Agree