Context:
In conversations with Ms. Robbins, it is understood that Armstrong Environmental Inc. has been retained by past or present owners or some combination of these parties.
Hypothesis: The company has been owned be numerous people OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No
Yes
Input: OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No

Present in chambers are counsel for both the plaintiffs and the defendants, and in addition to that, let me ask that you enter your appearances specially, presumably as counsel for the individuals we referred to in our orders collectively as "reporters."

Sentence: The counsel are asked to enter specific appearances.

Output: Yes
Problem:
Read the following paragraph and determine if the hypothesis is true:

downton abbey<br>Rachael really wanted Amy to watch downton abbey. It was a show that took place in the 20th century. Amy finally agreed to watch this show. Once she started watching it she was hooked. They would then have parties where they would watch it together.

OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No
Hypothesis: Racheal and Amy eat in the day before watching the show.
****
Answer:
It's impossible to say
[Q]: All right. Before we start the cross-examination, I think this will be an appropriate time for our afternoon break. We'll take that break for approximately 20 minutes, no longer than that, and we will return with Mr. Muise's cross-examination of the witness. We'll be in recess. (Recess taken.) Mr. Muise is a professional lawyer OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No
[A]: It's impossible to say
Problem: Mr Carstens left his job as IMF's deputy managing director last month to work with Mr Calderon, and will now lead efforts to push through market reforms and create more jobs.

Based on the paragraph above can we conclude that "Mr Carstens decided to take a two month vacation after leaving his job at IMF"? OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No

A: No
Context:
Well, the strongest First Amendment argument is about the retrospective extension, because of a fundamental change that occurs when Congress extends subsisting copyrights, rather than when Congress legislates prospectively. When Congress legislates prospectively, it has no way to know who's going to benefit from its extension.
Hypothesis: 4 million people are neither happy or sad with the amendment OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No
It's impossible to say