Sentence 1: To some proponents of case studies, the credibility of the method depends on what they call naturalistic generalizability.

Sentence 2: Nobody cares about the method or naturalistic generalizability of case studies as it makes no difference.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: no

Question:
yeah we had one uh course in Texas they uh used to string them up now they

Does it follow that "We had a course we did in Alabama."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
no

Q: If Missouri submitted its state plan to LSC on October 1, 1998., can we say that "They had their plan rejected on October 1, 1998."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A: no

Premise:
"but the very least that anybody filing income tax form will have to pay on is three hundred dollars and they create money out of thin air"
Hypothesis: Even if you have special circumstances you will have to pay more than three hundred dollars.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

it is not possible to tell

input question: Inside each cage is a hairy, live tarantula. If this premise is true, does that tell us:"A huge spider is in each cage."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: yes

Q: If From here, you can survey the whole 9 km (6 miles) of the golden, sandy beach., can we say that "The waves are very high at this beach."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A:
it is not possible to tell