Rick, There are very few single issues that require urgent consultation with you, however there are lots of little things that you may want to be aware of: We had an FSA 'Traded Risk' 2-day audit the past two days. The operations/risk group bore the brunt of the work but Michael Pitt and I spent some time with them as well and we did do some level of preparation. Jonathon Marsh, our compliance guy, seeemed very pleased with the result. You never get away clean, but I think that they were impressed with the effort as well as the Enron risk culture. by the way, my opinion of both Jonathan Marsh and Paul Freeman, the new technology guy is quite high - they are both good guys who want to make positive changes and not afraid to say whats on their mind. 2 risk policy issues came up - one regarding credit trading and the other regarding the freight book wanting to lay off credit risk with the credit book. these we are slated to discuss with you tomorrow. There are 2 new bad credits in Metals - 1 related to McCook where two of the 3 companies in the group declared ch 11 - we are owed est. $7.5MM the other co. is the one that has granted us a free gigantic option on tolling ally for power - the commercial team is attempting to work out a situation where we transfer the unsecured claims to the ch 11 entities to a first security package on the smelter in co 3. The other bad deal is a lead company out ogf the NY office where they owe us $450K on financials and we owe them $1MM on physicals - we are working on netting the positions There are a number of deals being worked on surrounding TPL ppa's in which the power positions would be taken on by Enron and we would get cash to either extinguish or re-mark the price (the purchases are way out of the money). There are 3 in the negotiation process - each big - not at the decision or DASH stage. we had a DASH signed off while I was away on ETOL for a gas turbine in which we get tolling in exchange for a capacity payment. I assume you are up to speed on the tragedy at TPL yesterday. Norway is looking at 2 large power prepays with municipal generators - low probability we will be circulating a DASH on $2MM more into Thrace - turkish e&p and pipeline play - total exp =$7.25MM team worked extensively with Jim ledlow and Brad on the analysis. deal looks fine on the surface - 46% iirr vs 35% capital price. only real issue is 'do we want to sink more $ into Turkey in order to improve the chances of a good sale or do we just put progress on hold' good news is that $1.5mm is coming from cash flow from the project. We have in the works one of the few EES NA-type deals with Guiness at a single facility. $9mm in capital. in the markets, we do not seem to be doing particularly well of late - Norway is down, uk gas has gotten caught in a short squeeze, uk power has lost a little, metals is metals .... things are moving on the personell front as well: Rudi starts monday Mike Mumford (internal transfer from Enron Credit) start 9/3 Tracy comes in mid September Blair van Zant -Director credit starts on 9/30
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: London Update
This schedule just covers agencies with CES and CEM. For most pipelines, It does not cover contracts where CES is acting as agent for another counterparty. Call if you have questions.
Answer: Agency Status
Here is an email: At the request of Rahil Jafry, I am attaching a copy of our proposed First Amendent to License Agreement, which extends the term from February 28, 2001 to April 30, 2001. If the Amendment meets with your approval, please execute it and return it to me via fax no. (713) 646-3490. If you have any questions or comments please call me at (713) 853-3399 or Rahil at (713) 853-3206. We look forward to hearing from you.
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: Amendment to License Agreement
Q: Good morning. Per Michael Tribolet's request, I am forwarding you graphs that display the high level detail of bankruptcy exposure by 1) Business Unit and 2) Enron Corp consolidated. Regarding the Portland General graph, please note that we currently have knowledge of only one counterparty exposure - PG&E. Please call me if you have any questions or comments. Thank you and have a great day. Regards,
Propose a subject line
A: Bankruptcy Exposure Graphs
IN: Mike, The change in the curves only shows a .60 increase today. The curves were down anywhere from .60 to 1.65 previous which was supposed to be up .25. Cin was up @ .15 today. That would mean that ENT should be up at least the amount it was down the previous day plus any increase marked today. Can you look into this for me. This is causing a $2MM hit in the books down here. Thanks.

Generate a subject line.

OUT: CURVES
IN: This is an email
Hi Kari: I know that you and I are both swamped, so I'm writing very briefly to give you a brief update. But first, thank you very much again for meeting last week. Greatly appreciated, and look forward to working together to help in any way I can to find solution that is acceptable to all. Here's the update: Our "subcommitte" is meeting tomorrow to try to close the deal on a proposed solution. It focuses on 3 key areas: Using the utilities retained assets to moderate prices. Designing a framework for forward contracting that strikes a much more appropriate balance in CA between state oversight and the need for utility flexibility. Rate stabilization/Undercollections (utility solvency) I will update you tomorrow on the group's progress. If thing's go according to plan, we may be in a position to submit something to you a early as Monday. If there's a deadline from your end that I ought to be aware of, let me know and I'll incorporate it into the subcommittee's work plan. In the meantime, if there is anything at all that I can do to help, please don't hesitiate to contact me. Thanks again and all the best,

What is the subject?

OUT:
Quick Update