We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Example Input: The 2nd Amendment doesn't say you have to be in a militia or participate one, it just aknowledges your right to own firearms for the purpose of forming one; i.e. no membership is implied or required to exercise it.
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: If I were the AG, and I were bent on trying to find out if a person has bought firearms, then I would first run a name search through a database like Accurint.
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: Or that someone has pointed out that gun rights advocates seem to have been panic-buying firearms in case the White House bans them?
Example Output:
Valid