In this task, you are given text for US Congressional and California state bills, your task is to generate a summary for this bill.

Example Input: SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ''Medicare Identity Theft Prevention
Act of 2010''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION OF INCLUSION OF SOCIAL SECURITY ACCOUNT NUMBERS ON
MEDICARE CARDS.

(a) In General.--Section 205(c)(2)(C) of the Social Security Act
(42 U.S.C. 405(c)(2)(C)), as amended by section 1414(a)(2) of the
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (Public Law 111-148), is
amended by adding at the end the following new clause:
''(xi) The Secretary of Health and Human Services, in consultation
with the Commissioner of Social Security, shall establish cost-
effective procedures to ensure that a social security account number
(or any derivative thereof) is not displayed, coded, or embedded on the
Medicare card issued to an individual who is entitled to benefits under
part A of title XVIII or enrolled under part B of title XVIII and that
any other identifier displayed on such card is easily identifiable as
not being the social security account number (or a derivative
thereof).''.
(b) Effective Date.--
(1) In general.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall
apply with respect to Medicare cards issued on and after an
effective date specified by the Secretary of Health and Human
Services, but in no case shall such effective date be later
than the date that is 24 months after the date adequate funding
is provided pursuant to subsection (d)(2).
(2) Reissuance.--Subject to subsection (d)(2), in the case
of individuals who have been issued such cards before such
date, the Secretary of Health and Human Services--
(A) shall provide for the reissuance for such
individuals of such a card that complies with such
amendment not later than 3 years after the effective
date specified under paragraph (1); and
(B) may permit such individuals to apply for the
reissuance of such a card that complies with such
amendment before the date of reissuance otherwise
provided under subparagraph (A) in such exceptional
circumstances as the Secretary may specify.
(c) Outreach Program.--Subject to subsection (d)(2), the Secretary
of Health and Human Services, in consultation with the Commissioner of
Social Security, shall conduct an outreach program to Medicare
beneficiaries and providers about the new Medicare card provided under
this section.
(d) Report to Congress and Limitations on Effective Date.--
(1) Report.--Not later than 90 days after the date of the
enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Health and Human
Services, acting through the Administrator of the Centers for
Medicare & Medicaid Services and in consultation with the
Commissioner of Social Security, shall submit to Congress a
report that includes detailed options regarding the
implementation of this section, including line-item estimates
of and justifications for the costs associated with such
options and estimates of timeframes for each stage of
implementation. In recommending such options, the Secretary
shall take into consideration, among other factors, cost-
effectiveness and beneficiary outreach and education.
(2) Limitation; modification of deadlines.--With respect to
the amendment made by subsection (a), and the requirements of
subsections (b) and (c)--
(A) such amendment and requirements shall not apply
until adequate funding is appropriated pursuant to
paragraph (3) to implement the provisions of this
section, as determined by Congress; and
(B) any deadlines otherwise established under this
section for such amendment and requirements are
contingent upon the receipt of adequate funding (as
determined in subparagraph (A)) for such
implementation.
The previous sentence shall not affect the timely submission of
the report required under paragraph (1).
(3) Authorization of appropriations.--
(A) In general.--In addition to any amounts made
available to the Secretary of Health and Human Services
for the Program Management Account of the Centers for
Medicare & Medicaid Services for administrative
expenses and to the Commissioner of Social Security for
administrative expenses, and subject to subparagraph
(B), taking into consideration the report submitted
under paragraph (1), there are authorized to be
appropriated such sums as are necessary to carry out
the previous subsections of this section, including
section 205(c)(2)(C)(xi) of the Social Security Act, as
added by subsection (a), for each of the five fiscal
years beginning after the date of submittal of the
report under paragraph (1).
(B) Limitation.--Such funds are not authorized to
be appropriated until after receipt of the report
provided under paragraph (1).
Example Output: Medicare Identity Theft Prevention Act of 2010 - Amends title II (Old Age, Survivors and Disability Insurance) (OASDI) of the Social Security Act to direct the Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS) to establish cost-effective procedures to ensure that: (1) a Social Security account number (or any derivative) is not displayed, coded, or embedded on the Medicare card issued to an individual entitled to benefits under part A (Hospital Insurance) of title XVIII (Medicare) of the Social Security Act or enrolled under Medicare part B (Supplementary Medical Insurance); and (2) any other identifier displayed on such card is easily identifiable as not being the Social Security account number (or a derivative).

Example Input: SECTION 1. BAN ON DISCLOSURE OF MEDICAL QUALITY ASSURANCE INFORMATION.

Subsection (a) of section 5705 of title 38, United States Code, is
amended--
(1) by inserting ''(1)'' after ''(a)''; and
(2) by adding at the end the following:
''(2)(A) Except as provided in subsection (b), no part of any
medical quality assurance record or document described in subsection
(a)(1) may be subject to discovery or admitted into evidence in any
judicial or administrative proceeding.
''(B) An individual who reviews or creates medical quality
assurance records or documents for the Department or who participates
in any proceeding that reviews or creates such records or documents may
not be permitted or required to testify in any judicial or
administrative proceeding with respect to such records or documents or
with respect to any finding, recommendation, evaluation, opinion, or
action taken by such person in connection with such records or
documents except as provided in this section.''.

SEC. 2. DISCLOSURE AUTHORITY.

(a) Clarification of Coverage.--Subsection (b)(1) of section 5705
of title 38, United States Code, is amended by striking out ''or
document'' in the matter above subparagraph (A) and inserting in lieu
thereof '', document, or testimony''.
(b) Disclosure for Professional Use.--Such subsection is further
amended by adding at the end the following:
''(E) In an administrative or judicial proceeding commenced
by a criminal or civil law enforcement agency or
instrumentality referred to in subparagraph (C), but only
concerning the subject of such proceeding.
''(F) To a governmental board or agency or to a
professional health care society or organization, if such
record or document is needed by the board, agency, society, or
organization to issue a professional license or credential to
or to monitor the compliance with professional standards of any
health care provider who is or was an employee of the
Department.
''(G) To a hospital, medical center, or other institution
that provides health care services, if such record or document
is needed by the institution to assess the professional
qualifications of any health care provider who is or was an
employee of the Department and who has applied for or been
granted authority or employment to provide health care services
in or on behalf of such institution.
''(H) To an administrative or judicial proceeding commenced
by a present or former Department health care provider
concerning the termination, suspension or limitation of the
clinical privileges of such health care provider, or concerning
any adverse action involving such health care provider, but
only to the extent that such records or documents relate to the
clinical conduct or performance of the individual who has
commenced the action.''.
(c) Removal of Identities.--Subsection (b)(2) of such section is
amended by striking out ''if disclosure'' and all that follows through
''personal privacy'' and inserting in lieu thereof ''subparagraphs
(1)(A) and (1)(B) of this subsection''.

SEC. 3. LIMITATION ON DISCLOSURE.

Paragraph (3) of section 5705(b) of title 38, United States Code,
is amended to read as follows:
''(3) A person or entity having possession of, or access to,
information, records, or documents, or testimony relating thereto, that
is subject to the provisions of this section may not disclose such
information, records, or documents, or any testimony relating thereto,
in any manner or for any purpose except for a purpose as provided in
this subsection. No person or entity to whom a record or document has
been disclosed under this subsection shall make further disclosure of
such record or document except for a purpose provided in this
subsection.''.

SEC. 4. ACCESS TO RECORDS.

Subsection (b) of section 5705 of title 38, United States Code, is
amended by adding at the end the following:
''(7) Medical quality assurance records and documents described in
subsection (a) which are subject to section 552a of title 5 may not be
disclosed in accordance with that section except to the extent that
such disclosure is also authorized under this section.
''(8) Medical quality assurance records or documents described in
subsection (a) which are also subject to section 552a of title 5--
''(A) shall not be subject to the access provisions of such
section 552a to the extent that such access would reveal the
identities of participants in the quality assurance process
which generated the records or documents; and
''(B) are not subject to the amendment provisions of such
section 552a.
''(9) Medical quality assurance records and documents described in
subsection (a) may not be made available to any person under section
552 of title 5.''.

SEC. 5. REGULATIONS.

Subsection (d)(2) of section 5705 of title 38, United States Code,
is amended by striking out ''specified in'' and inserting in lieu
thereof ''accomplished in accordance with''.
Example Output: Prohibits Department of Veterans Affairs medical quality assurance records from being subject to discovery or admitted into evidence in any judicial or administrative proceeding. Prohibits an individual who participates in the production of such records from being required to testify at such a proceeding.
Allows testimony concerning such records (currently, only the records or documents themselves) to be disclosed to Federal agencies for certain limited purposes (licensing, accreditation). Specifies additional uses for which such information may be disclosed.
Includes information and testimony related to such records within certain disclosure limitation provisions.
Prohibits the disclosure of such records by the Department as public information to the extent that such disclosure would reveal the identities of the participants in the quality assurance process which generated the records or documents.

Example Input: SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ''Dungeness Crab Conservation and
Management Act''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS AND PURPOSES.

(a) Findings.--Congress finds that--
(1) the ocean Dungeness crab (Cancer magister) fishery
adjacent to the States of Washington, Oregon, and California
has been successfully conserved and managed by those States
since the 19th century;
(2) in recognition of the need for coastwide conservation
of Dungeness crab, the States of Washington, Oregon, and
California have--
(A) enacted certain laws that promote conservation
of the resource;
(B) signed a memorandum of understanding declaring
the intent of those States to take mutually supportive
actions to further the management of Dungeness crab;
and
(C) through the Pacific States Marine Fisheries
Commission, formed the Tri-State Dungeness Crab
Committee to provide a public forum for coordinating
conservation and management actions;
(3) tribal treaty rights to crab under the subproceeding
numbered 89-3 in United States v. Washington, D.C. No. CV-70-
09213, are being implemented by the State of Washington through
annual preseason negotiations with the affected Indian tribes;
(4) the expiration of interim authority referred to in
paragraph (7) will jeopardize the ability of the State to
effectively provide for State-tribal harvest agreements that
include restrictions on nontreaty fishers in the exclusive
economic zone;
(5) the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and
Management Act (16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.) requires that Federal
fishery management plans be established for fisheries that
require conservation and management;
(6) under the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and
Management Act, several fisheries in the Atlantic and Pacific
Oceans, including king crab in the Gulf of Alaska, have
remained under the jurisdiction of individual States or
interstate organizations because conservation and management
can be better achieved without the implementation of a Federal
fishery management plan;
(7) section 112(d) of the Sustainable Fisheries Act (Public
Law 104-297; 110 Stat. 3596 though 3597) provided interim
authority for the States of Washington, Oregon, and California
to exercise limited jurisdiction over the ocean Dungeness crab
fishery in the exclusive economic zone and required the Pacific
Fishery Management Council to report to Congress on progress in
developing a fishery management plan for ocean Dungeness crab
and any impediments to that progress;
(8) the Pacific Fishery Management Council diligently
carried out the responsibilities referred to in paragraph (7)
by holding public hearings, requesting recommendations from a
committee of that Council and the Tri-State Dungeness Crab
Committee;
(9) representatives from the Indian tribes involved, the
west coast Dungeness crab industry, and the fishery management
agencies of the States of Washington, Oregon, and California
were consulted by the Pacific Fishery Management Council, and
the Council voted in public session on its final report; and
(10) by a unanimous vote, the Pacific Fishery Management
Council found that amending section 112 of the Sustainable
Fisheries Act and providing for permanent authority to the
States of Washington, Oregon, and California to manage, with
certain limitations, the ocean Dungeness crab fishery in that
portion of the exclusive economic zone adjacent to each of the
States, respectively, and continued participation by fishermen
and the Indian tribes subject to the tribal treaty rights
referred to in paragraph (3) would--
(A) best accomplish the conservation and management
of the ocean Dungeness crab fishery; and
(B) best serve the public interest.
(b) Purposes.--The purposes of this Act are--
(1) to provide for the continued conservation and
management of ocean Dungeness crab in a manner that recognizes
the contributions of the States of Washington, Oregon, and
California and the needs of the Indian tribes that are subject
to the tribal treaty rights to crab described in subsection
(a)(3); and
(2) to carry out the recommendations that the Pacific
Fishery Management Council made in accordance with requirements
established by Congress.

SEC. 3. DEFINITIONS.

In this Act:
(1) Exclusive economic zone.--The term ''exclusive economic
zone'' has the meaning given that term in section 3(11) of the
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (16
U.S.C. 1802(11)).
(2) Fishery.--The term ''fishery'' has the meaning given
that term in section 3(13) of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Management Act (16 U.S.C. 1802(13)).
(3) Fishing.--The term ''fishing'' has the meaning given
that term in section 3(15) of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act (16 U.S.C. 1802(15)).

SEC. 4. AUTHORITY FOR MANAGEMENT OF DUNGENESS CRAB.

(a) In General.--Subject to the provisions of this section, and
notwithstanding section 306(a) of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act (16 U.S.C. 1856(a)), each of the States
of Washington, Oregon, and California may adopt and enforce State laws
(including regulations) governing fishing and processing in the
exclusive economic zone adjacent to that State in any Dungeness crab
(Cancer magister) fishery for which there is no fishery management plan
in effect under the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and
Management Act (16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.).
(b) Requirements for State Laws.--Any law adopted by a State under
this section for a Dungeness crab fishery--
(1) except as provided in paragraph (2), shall, without
regard to the State that issued the permit under which a vessel
is operating, apply equally to--
(A) vessels engaged in the fishery in the exclusive
economic zone; and
(B) vessels engaged in the fishery in the waters of
the State;
(2) shall not apply to any fishing by a vessel in the
exercise of tribal treaty rights; and
(3) shall include any provisions necessary to implement
tribal treaty rights in a manner consistent with the decision
of the United States District Court for the Western District of
Washington in United States v. Washington, D.C. No. CV-70-
09213.
(c) Exclusive Economic Zone.--
(1) In general.--Subject to paragraph (2), any law of the
State of Washington, Oregon, or California that establishes or
implements a limited entry system for a Dungeness crab fishery
may not be enforced against a vessel that--
(A) is otherwise legally fishing in the exclusive
economic zone adjacent to that State; and
(B) is not registered under the laws of that State.
(2) Exclusion.--A State referred to in paragraph (1) may
regulate the landing of Dungeness crab.
(d) Requirements for Harvest.--No vessel may harvest or process
Dungeness crab in the exclusive economic zone adjacent to the State of
Washington, Oregon, or California, except--
(1) as authorized by a permit issued by any of the States
referred to in subsection (c)(1); or
(2) under any tribal treaty rights to Dungeness crab in a
manner consistent with the decision of the United States
District Court for the Western District of Washington in United
States v. Washington, D.C. No. CV-70-09213.
(e) Statutory Construction.--Except as expressly provided in this
section, nothing in this section is intended to reduce the authority of
any State under the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and
Management Act (16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.) to regulate fishing, fish
processing, or landing of fish.

SEC. 5. ELIMINATION OF INTERIM AUTHORITY.

Section 112 of the Sustainable Fisheries Act (Public Law 104-297;
110 Stat. 3596) is amended by striking subsection (d).
Example Output:
Dungeness Crab Conservation and Management Act - Authorizes each of the States of Washington, Oregon, and California to adopt and enforce laws and regulations governing fishing and processing in the exclusive economic zone (EEZ) adjacent to that State in any Dungeness crab fishery for which there is no management plan in effect under the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act. Prohibits harvesting or processing Dungeness crab in the EEZ adjacent to those States except as authorized by a permit issued by any of those States or under certain tribal rights. Removes related interim authority provisions of the Sustainable Fisheries Act.