We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control) into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.
--------
Question: Sent1: ATF then obtains the sale records which every FFL dealer is required to maintain for every firearm and learns when the gun was received by the dealer and when and to whom the particular gun was sold.
Sent2: To purchase a firearm in a commercial shop, one needs to have a Waffenerwerbsschein (weapon acquisition permit).

Answer: Not similar

Question: Sent1: Also once you become an agent of the government you stop having right, you have authorities and you're controlled by the people the Constitution is supposed to protect you against.
Sent2: And now that these facts have been established, why are you guys ONLY calling for more and more restrictions, all of the time, doing your level best, to try and demean people who are trying to protect the Constitution?

Answer: Not similar

Question: Sent1: I don't reallly see the inconsistency unless you view the right to keep andbear arms as a right that should be protected.
Sent2: This makes sense when you consider that the second amendment protects the right of the people to bear arms in connection with an organized militia.

Answer:
Not similar