Problem: Here is a premise:
But the goal is to have fewer persons become addicted to nicotine at an age when information about the health hazards is likely to be ignored.

Here is a hypothesis:
The information about nicotine's health hazards is likely to be ignored.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Sentence 1: The man who came up the staircase with a furtive, softfooted tread was quite unknown to Tommy.

Sentence 2: Tommy did not recognize the man who came up the stairs, so he hit him with a club.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question:
But now he was not sure.

Does it follow that "Now he wasn't certain."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
yes

Q: If The movie reeks of film-student overkill (Susan Wloszczyna, USA Today ). It would only be allowed to ooz[e] out of Miramax's storeroom in the otherwise fallow month of January, says the Village Voice 's Amy [I]ts devices are too shopworn to allow for a personal or original point of view., can we say that "The movie reeks of film-student overkill because fails at having true meaning."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A: it is not possible to tell

Premise:
"Without a lawyer facing the batterer in the context of the courtroom . . . it can be intimidating."
Hypothesis: Facing the batterer without a lawyer by your side can be frightening.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

yes

Sentence 1: Is the cost-cutting story plausible?

Sentence 2: I think that story is correct.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer:
it is not possible to tell