Sentence 1: Of course not, the Pentagon responded.

Sentence 2: The pentagon responded by saying that it was not.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: yes

Question:
This narrative (1) stated that Information is a corporate asset . . . . Information must be protected according to its sensitivity, criticality and value, regardless of the media on which it is stored, the manual or automated systems that process it, or the methods by which it is distributed, (2) outlined the responsibilities of information owners, custodians, and users, (3) defined the organization's three data classification categories, and (4) stated that each business unit should develop an information protection program to implement these policies.

Does it follow that "Businesses should throw out information if it's not of utmost importance."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
no

Q: If The street felt darker and within each face he saw anger and violence., can we say that "She was furious."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A: yes

Premise:
"It's so utterly foolish."
Hypothesis: You'd have to be mad to believe it.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

it is not possible to tell

input question: In a broad sense, costs can be assigned to processes, activities, organizational divisions, products, and services. If this premise is true, does that tell us:"Costs cannot be assigned to processes"?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: no

Q: If approximately um-hum um-hum we live on a used to be a farm but we don't farm much we uh but we do have a garden, can we say that "Oh, we don't actually live in that farm, mostly because there isn't enough space for a garden."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A:
no