UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION Texas Gas Transmission Corporation Docket No. RP01-278-002 NOTICE OF COMPLIANCE FILING (October 22, 2001) Take notice that on October 17, 2001, Texas Gas Transmission Corporation (Texas Gas) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, First Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets to become effective October 1, 2001: Primary Third Revised Sheet No. 181 Third Revised Sheet No. 182 Third Revised Sheet No. 183 Sheet No. 184 (reserved) Second Revised Sheet No. 185 Alternate Alternate Third Revised Sheet No. 181 Alternate Third Revised Sheet No. 182 Alternate Third Revised Sheet No. 183 Texas Gas states that this filing is being submitted in compliance with the Commission's Order issued on September 19, 2001 in the above-referenced docket. As directed, the tariff sheets removed the daily high/low index price for cash-out. In response, Texas Gas proposes to establish a cash-out price based on a weekly high/low index price determined from the weeks within the applicable month, plus the first week of the following month. The primary and alternate sheets require in-kind make-up of imbalances up to 2% and use the same index price for imbalances above 5%. However, the primary sheets also propose to eliminate cash-out for all imbalances up to 5% by also requiring a mandatory in-kind make-up level from 2% to 5% and by eliminating any use of the 100% price index for this tier of imbalance. Texas Gas states that copies of the revised tariff sheets are being mailed to Texas Gas's jurisdictional customers and interested state commissions.
Answer: texas gas tries one more time -- modified cash pool filing
Here is an email: Gas and coal article interesting... Indigestion Daniel Fisher, Forbes Magazine, 10.29.01 All those new natural gas-fired electric plants mean more gas demand, right? Maybe not. For natural gas bulls, there was never a surer sign of good times to come than the order book at General Electric Corp. Backlogs in GE's Power Systems group almost tripled to $25 billion in the late 1990s as scores of utilities and freestanding power producers ordered natural gas turbines to supply the nation's growing appetite for electricity. Gas demand had to go up as all those shiny new turbines were connected to the grid. Ah, but there was a flaw in that argument--one that is becoming glaringly clear as the price of gas plunges below $2 per million Btu at the wellhead from as high as $10 last year. (A million Btu of gas equals just about 1,000 cubic feet.) Those new gas plants were supposed to steal business from pollution-spewing coal units, which still supply half the nation's electricity. But in a painstaking study of 788 power plants that supply the bulk of U.S. electricity, Charles Studness, president of Studness Research, found quite the opposite could happen.
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: Forbes Article-Gas Fired Power Plants 10-29-01
Q: Will, I am attaching a list of the deals (both physical and financial) which simply need a desk name change to East or West Bankrupt, whichever is relevant. My list details the deal #, counterparty full name and the termination date. Let me know if this makes sense, and as always, thank you so much for your help! Casey
Propose a subject line
A: desk change list
IN: Apologies for the short notice, but we would like to issue the attached press release tonight, so that we have announced Ray's appointment prior to tomorrow's conference call. If you have any comments or changes, please let me know as soon as possible. Thank you.

Generate a subject line.

OUT: Bowen Press Release
IN: This is an email
Reggie just brought around a whole stack of confirms of pulp & paper deals that came into the fax area. Is anyone looking for this stack of confirms? If not, I'll have Reggie walk them down to Joe Hunter.

What is the subject?

OUT: Pulp & Paper Confirms
Todd Menzing called me up a few days ago to ask if he could send a letter to me about what I understand to be his representation of a former Enron employee against us in an HR matter. I hadn't heard from him, so I followed up today and learned that he had or was going to send a letter to you. Menzing is a former V&E associate. He called me because he knew me from a case in which V&E was representing a party in a commercial litigation matter, and I was representing an Enron employee in a deposition in that matter. Maybe there is an easy, no-brainer answer to what appears to be a potential disqualification issue for both Menzing and his firm (remember the mad cow disease of legal ethics? ) but if you were not already aware of Menzing's prior employer, I thought I'd let you know. Britt
Answer:
Potential HR Matter