Hi Scott, I have some questions: The obligation to try to improve performance about the specific performance (ie minimum) standards frequently has a time limit, say 6 months. Do you have a sense for the appropriate time period here? Would it make sense to require them to work longer on the first 2.0 and 2.4 than the rest? Will we have a drawing number for a standard foundation design, or will we need to put words around it. I know we discussed the need for pilings as the most significant change. Do you think that this difference is enough? Did I understand that we want them to pay us at the end for non-standard foundations (as opposed to a credit).
Answer: FuelCell contract questions
Here is an email: Chump, Long time no hear. Sorry it's taken me so long to touch base with you. Between work, the wedding, and the fact that we just purchased a house (pending inspections) I've been pretty stressed. As far as the wedding goes Lisa and I have decided to scale down considerably. We're only going to have immediately family and the folks in the wedding party. For me that includes you of course, Moller, Kampy and Peremes (even though she won't be in the wedding). Don't tell her though, she's the only one I haven't mentioned anything to. I'll make sure you and Moller get to share a room. I feel kinda bad about not inviting Lowery since I was in his wedding, but I don't feel like dealing with Kim. She's really annoyed me the last few times I've seen her. We still plan on having it at the B&B in Long Beach Island. We'll have a catered dinner for about 45 folks. It should be more manageable and cheaper this way. Do you have the exact date when you'll move back to the states? I'm psyched you'll be a lot closer. You could swing over to Houston and check out the new house. By that time we should have it in decent shape. We bought the ugliest, most beat-up house on the block. It definitely needs a lot of work. We'll be busy for the next year working on it. I think when it's done, it'll look pretty cool. Anyway, send me an email and let me know how everything's going and when you'll be back. Take care and tell Marie we said hi. Kevin
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: Wedding
Q: Hi there. Nothings comes off the list. New additions are as follows: New transaction with Morgan Stanley Dean Witter, relating to the creation of a jointly owned control area to address generation, transmission, and retail load delivery. It is brand-spanking new, so I don't know much more than this. It is being handled by Ozzie Pagan. New opportunity with New Jersey Natural to develop projects using Fuel Cells. Heather Kroll is the contact. Sale of Blue Dog (GE) turbine. Likely buyer (at last word) is NRG. Could be complicated if GE protests. There's a rumor that we are buying some new turbines from GE, but I haven't been contacted. The rumor came from GE reps, who asked if I was working on it. Sheila isn't handling, either, last I knew. Everything else is the same. I expect to be in NYC in the middle of the week to continue negotiations on the Co Op City deal (with Mark Bernstein). Please let me know if you have any questions. Kay
Propose a subject line
A: Update on what I'm working on.
IN: Dear Sir; Passed Suez canal. Captain Oe Hansen relieved by Captain Knut Bentzr?d. Commenced sea voyage at N 29,8? E 032,5?, 1630 LT (1330 GMT) A) Position at noon : NA B) Dist. from last noon : NA C) Dist. to go to next port: 2472 nm D) Eta next port : 13 May 0900 LT Brgds Knut Bentzr?d Master E-mail: master.gall@hoegh.no Teleph: Inmarsat tel.no.+874 330853910 Fax : Inmarsat fax no.+874 330853913 Telex : Inmarsat B telex no.+584 330853915 Telex : Inmarsat C telex no.+584 430853910 (24hrs.watch)

Generate a subject line.

OUT: Departure report 7 May
IN: This is an email
Contract 62039 was replace with contract 65402. It's 20,000 day with a primary receipt of Maumee and a primary delivery of COH. The term is 11/1/99 - 10/31/2000. Should I bill the retail group for this contract or does this belong to wholesale?? Also, I'm showing a demand charge of $.15.

What is the subject?

OUT: CGAS k#62039
Debra, as we discussed, here is credit assurances language that Select proposes to add to the Firm GTC, in addition to the other changes requested by Select on 10/15/01. Credit Assurances. If either party (Party A) has reasonable grounds to believe that the other party's (Party B) creditworthiness or performance under this Firm GTC has become unsatisfactory, Party A will provide Party B with written notice requesting Performance Assurance in an amount determined by Party A in a commercially reasonable manner. Upon receipt of such notice Party B shall have three (3) Business Days to remedy the situation by providing such Performance Assurance to Party A. In the event that Party B fails to provide such Performance Assurance, or a guaranty or other credit assurance acceptable to Party A within three (3) Business Days of receipt of notice, then an Event of Default will be deemed to have occurred and Party A will be entitled to the remedies set forth in Section 3 of this Firm GTC.
Answer:
Proposed Addition to Enfolio Firm General Terms & Conditions