Based on the information present in the given passage, you need to write a correct answer to the given question. A correct answer is one that correctly and completely answers the question. Do not write answers that address the question partially or incorrectly. The correct answer must be contained in the given paragraph.

Ex Input:
Paragraph- Sent 1: You write: "Having created the desired impression, Moore follows with his Heston interview."Sent 2: No, he doesn't.
Sent 3: You accuse Moore so often of changing the chronology, yet you have no problems changing it yourself.
Sent 4: The Heston interview is at the very end of the movie.
Sent 5: After the Flint rally comes a brief TV interview with Heston, where he is asked about Kayla Rolland (again, clear evidence that the local media in Flint raised questions about the NRA's presence), then an inteview with country prosecutor Arthur Busch, entirely ignored by critics of the film, who also mentions Heston's presence as notable, and refers to the immediate reactions of "people from all over America", gun owners/groups who, according to him, reacted aggressively to warnings of having guns accessible to children, much like spanking advocates react aggressively when anti-spankers point to a case of a child being killed or severely injured by a beating.
Sent 6: These people do not feel the need to express sympathy, or to think about ways to avoid such incidents, but they feel the need to assert their "rights" and to look for quick, simple answers -- as Busch states, gun owners wanted to "hang [the child] from the highest tree".
Sent 7: This is all not mentioned by critics of Moore's movie, who claim to be objective.
Sent 8: Perhaps the best example of the paranoia surrounding Moore's film is your sub-essay "Is the end of the Heston interview itself faked?"Sent 9: Moore answers a simple question -- how could the scene have been filmed -- with a simple answer: two cameras.
Sent 10: From this, you construct an obscure conspiracy of "re-enactment": "For all we can tell, Moore could have shouted 'Hey!'Sent 11: to make Heston turn around and then remained silent as Heston left."Sent 12: Even if your "re-enactment" theory is true (and I see no evidence that you have actually tried to ask the people involved in the filmmaking for their opinion), this itself is not unethical, and you have no evidence whatsoever that Moore has done anything unethical here, just like you have no evidence that Moore has unethically removed parts of the interview.
Sent 13: You use standard filmmaking technique as a basis to construct bizarre conspiracies which sound plausible to the gullible reader, without ever providing any evidence for the implicit or explicit claims of fraud and distortion.
Question: What is not mentioned by critics of Moore's movie?.

Ex Output:
That people do not feel the need to express sympathy, or to think about ways to avoid such incidents, but they feel the need to assert their "rights".

Ex Input:
Paragraph- Sent 1: Before 9/11, the CIA did not invest in developing a robust capability to conduct paramilitary operations with U.S. personnel.
Sent 2: It relied on proxies instead, organized by CIA operatives without the requisite military training.
Sent 3: The results were unsatisfactory.
Sent 4: Whether the price is measured in either money or people, the United States cannot afford to build two separate capabilities for carrying out secret military operations, secretly operating standoff missiles, and secretly training foreign military or paramilitary forces.
Sent 5: The United States should concentrate responsibility and necessary legal authorities in one entity.
Sent 6: The post-9/11 Afghanistan precedent of using joint CIA-military teams for covert and clandestine operations was a good one.
Sent 7: We believe this proposal to be consistent with it.
Sent 8: Each agency would concentrate on its comparative advantages in building capabilities for joint missions.
Sent 9: The operation itself would be planned in common.
Sent 10: The CIA has a reputation for agility in operations.
Sent 11: The military has a reputation for being methodical and cumbersome.
Sent 12: We do not know if these stereotypes match current reality; they may also be one more symptom of the civil-military misunderstandings we described in chapter 4.
Sent 13: It is a problem to be resolved in policy guidance and agency management, not in the creation of redundant, overlapping capabilities and authorities in such sensitive work.
Sent 14: The CIA's experts should be integrated into the military's training, exercises, and planning.
Sent 15: To quote a CIA official now serving in the field:"One fight, one team."Sent 16: Finally, to combat the secrecy and complexity we have described, the overall amounts of money being appropriated for national intelligence and to its component agencies should no longer be kept secret.
Sent 17: Congress should pass a separate appropriations act for intelligence, defending the broad allocation of how these tens of billions of dollars have been assigned among the varieties of intelligence work.
Sent 18: The specifics of the intelligence appropriation would remain classified, as they are today.
Question: What was unsatisfactory without requisite military training?.

Ex Output:
11 relying on proxies instead of training U.S. personnel for paramilitary operations.

Ex Input:
Paragraph- Sent 1: Dirk Diggler was born as Steven Samuel Adams on April 15 , 1961 outside of Saint Paul , Minnesota .
Sent 2: His parents were a construction worker and a boutique shop owner who attended church every Sunday and believed in God .
Sent 3: Looking for a career as a male model , Diggler dropped out of school at age 16 and left home .
Sent 4: He was discovered at a falafel stand by Jack Horner .
Sent 5: Diggler met his friend , Reed Rothchild , through Horner in 1979 while working on a film .
Sent 6: Horner slowly introduced Diggler to the business until he became noticeable within the industry .
Sent 7: Diggler became a prominent model and began appearing in pornographic films , after Which his career took off .
Sent 8: He had critical and box office hits Which led him to stardom .
Sent 9: The hits and publicity led to fame and money Which led Diggler to the world of drugs .
Sent 10: With the amount of money Diggler was making he was able to support both his and Rothchild's addictions .
Sent 11: The drugs eventually caused a breakup between Diggler and Horner since Diggler was having issues with his performance on set .
Sent 12: After the breakup Diggler tried to make a film himself but the film was never completed .
Sent 13: He then attempted a music career Which was also successful but led him deeper into drugs because of the amount of money he was making .
Sent 14: He then starred in a TV show Which was a failure both critically and commercially .
Sent 15: Having failed and with no work , Diggler returned to the porn industry taking roles in low-budget homosexual films to help support his habit .
Question: What caused Diggler to have less success?.

Ex Output:
Drugs.