QUESTION: Premise: "A person walking by a dilapidated brick building."
Hypothesis: "A person passes a building."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?

Let's solve it slowly: Walking by is another way to say passes. Dilapidated brick describes the building.
The answer is yes.

[QUESTION] Given the sentence "A skier is going down a huge snow covered slope." can we conclude that "The skier is seated near the fireplace."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
The skier can either be on the slope or near the fireplace.
The answer is no.

Q: Premise: "A monk walks down a city street."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A person striding next to a road." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A: A monk that walks down a street is described more generally as a person striding by a road.
The answer is yes.

QUESTION: Can we conclude from "A man standing by a building corner and reading a newspaper." that "A man standing by a building is reading."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell

Let's solve it slowly: No noninferrable information. Sentence one states that the man is standing by the building reading.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

[QUESTION] If "A snowboarder dressed in red is attempting to jump over a red board lying on top of snow." does that mean that "The snowboarder is a professional."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A snowboarder attempting a jump doesn't mean they are a professional.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

Q: Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "A construction worker in a hard hat."
Hypothesis: "Red shirt and yellow and orange vest operates a piece of machinery in front of palm trees."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
A:
A person is driving a car in front of oak trees.
The answer is no.