Sue, I am sending you this e-mail because I received your voice message well after you left it today. I reviewed the text files that are sent out by the book administrators on my desks and none of them contain any deals booked to the counterparty El Paso Gas Marketing. All of the deals from people on my desk are booked to the valid El Paso counterparty per our conversations. I will be out of the office tomorrow, but I will be checking my voicemail frequently and communicating with my group. If the same problem arises tomorrow, please call me at 713-305-1502 so that we can discuss, because there has to be some other explanation for the erroneous counterparty showing up on your report. Thank you,
Answer: El Paso Status in the Exotic Files
Here is an email: Attached is the phone list for the HPL people ... it's a preliminary one, but it's the only one I've gotten my hands on so far. This is just for now. Laura
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: HPL Phone List
Q: Due to computer troubles etc. I did not get the confirms or agreement out last night. I assure you it is going today via Fed Ex First Delivery. Is the previous address still the location you want these docs sent too?
Propose a subject line
A: Honeywell
IN: Transwestern's average deliveries to California were 924 MMBtu/d (85%), with San Juan lateral throughput at 849 MMBtu/d. Total East deliveries averaged 479 MMBtu/d. El Paso's average deliveries to California were 2146 MMBtu/d (73%): - PG&ETop, capacity of 1140 MMBtu/d, deliveries of 716 MMBtu/d (63%) - SoCalEhr, capacity 1250 MMBtu/d, deliveries of 985 MMBtu/d (79%) - SoCalTop, capacity 540 MMBtu/d, deliveries of 445 MMBtu/d (82%) Friday's posted Gas Daily prices: SoCal gas, large pkgs 1.94 (-.635) PG&E, large pkgs 1.855 (-.61) TW San Juan 1.62 (-.70) TW Permian 1.71 (-.70) Enron Online bases: Dec-Mar Apr-Oct Perm-CA .05 (-.03) .21 (-.02) SJ - CA .20 (even) .41 (-.03) SJ-Waha .20 (+.04) .26 (+.01) Perm-Waha .05 (+.01) .06 (+.01)

Generate a subject line.

OUT: California Capacity Report for Week of 11/12-11/16
IN: This is an email
Periodically, you will be receiving email notices from Mechelle Atwood requesting response to audit findings for which you were identified as the responsible party. Please complete the required documentation in a timely manner, as closing out the audit issues is critical to wrapping up the audit process for FY2001. If you have any questions, please contact Mechelle directly at ext. 54554. Thanks you for your cooperation and prompt attention to this matter.

What is the subject?

OUT: Response to Audit Findings
In Mark Baldwin's June 19 letter, he proposed the following fee schedule for project development: Retainer: $1000/month plus expenses Accepted project (meets TW's predetermined financial hurdles): Proposal $5000 Each month TW actively negotiating project: $1500/month (each project) Letter of Intent: $5000 Signed Agreement: $10,000 Incentive Fee: To be determined When I spoke with Mark, he explained that this schedule was based on reaching certain milestones in the development of individual projects. In his letter he also proposed monthly fees for regulatory services ($5000/mo.) and market development services (including SoCal OIR related services --
Answer:
IGS