In this task, you will be shown a sentence, and you should determine whether it is overruling or non-overruling. In law, an overruling sentence is a statement that nullifies a previous case decision as a precedent by a constitutionally valid statute or a decision by the same or higher ranking court which establishes a different rule on the point of law involved. Classify your answers into overruling or non-overruling

Ex Input:
of course, lucas and garcia, dealing with mandatory minimum sentences, are likewise overruled to the extent they conflict with harris and this opinion.

Ex Output:
overruling

Ex Input:
consequently, to the extent that miller or perez can still be read as authority for overlooking a party's failure to make a timely and specific objection to the admission of evidence at trial and subsequently preserve the issue for appellate review by including it in a 1925(b) statement to which the trial court responds, their rationale for overlooking waiver is disavowed.

Ex Output:
overruling

Ex Input:
nonetheless, we must recede from williams v. state, 427 so.2d 768 (fla. 2d dca 1983), and matthews v. state, 584 so.2d 1105 (fla. 2d dca 1991), to the extent that these opinions engraft a "fair trial" standard upon the faretta test, and we disapprove steps four through six of the faretta inquiry in jones v. state, 658 so.2d 122 (fla. 2d dca 1995) (altenbernd, j., specially concurring), which relied upon williams and matthews.

Ex Output:
overruling