Question: Sentence A: uh-huh yeah the uh yeah it's it's uh it is convenient to have that you know and it and if you can do a the a lot more with the American Express when we do when we go traveling

Sentence B: I love to travel and see new sights.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question: Adjacent to the Star Ferry terminal is Ocean Terminal, where international cruise ships dock, and the gigantic Harbour City a complex of malls, hotels, and restaurants.
Across from the Ocean Terminal is the Star Ferry terminal and Harbour City.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Problem: Here is a premise:
For suckers.

Here is a hypothesis:
It's for suckers because no one smart would ever believe it.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Sentence 1: The commentariat has nothing new to say about Issue 4, the president's ongoing legal battles.

Sentence 2: The ongoing legal battles of the President are the 4th issue.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: yes

Question:
Among the organizations we studied, the pressures applied by oversight entities and top management were instrumental as change agents.

Does it follow that "Among the organizations studied the pressure was applied by Barrack Obama."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
it is not possible to tell

Question:
Based on the premise "We accept the judgment of the court and will comply with it, said Clinton's lawyer.", can we conclude that "Clinton's lawyer said that they will accept the judgement the court makes."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
yes