Q: Premise: "A man is using a grinder on a locker's lock."
Hypothesis: "A man uses a grinder to hurt people inside a locker."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
A: Either one uses a grinder on a locker's or to hurt people inside the locker.
The answer is no.

QUESTION: Premise: "Two asian men are doing carpentry work."
Hypothesis: "Two young men are hammering nails."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Let's solve it slowly: Just because two Asian men are doing carpentry work does not mean that they are hammering nails.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

[QUESTION] Premise: "A batter swings at a ball."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A person is on a baseball team." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A batter is not necessarily assumed to be on a baseball team.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

Q: Given the sentence "A child playing with some yarn." can we conclude that "A kid has yarn."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A: A child is a kid. To be playing with something he has to have (has) it.
The answer is yes.

QUESTION: Premise: "An overweight gentleman wearing a red shirt cooks on a grill."
Hypothesis: "A man is grilling some food."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?

Let's solve it slowly: A gentleman is a type of man. Cooking on a grill is grilling.
The answer is yes.

QUESTION: Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "Little boy in green tube smilling with his hair sticking up he has on a black and blue striped shirt and tennis shoes."
Hypothesis: "The boy is stuck in a well."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell

Let's solve it slowly:
A little boy cannot be in both a green tube and a well.
The answer is no.