instruction:
In this task, you are given the abstract of a research paper. Your task is to generate a summary of this abstract. Your summary should not be very short, but it's better if it's not more than 30 words.
question:
We present a hybrid framework that leverages the trade-off between temporal and frequency precision in audio representations to improve the performance of speech enhancement task. We first show that conventional approaches using specific representations such as raw-audio and spectrograms are each effective at targeting different types of noise.
By integrating both approaches, our model can learn multi-scale and multi-domain features, effectively removing noise existing on different regions on the time-frequency space in a complementary way. Experimental results show that the proposed hybrid model yields better performance and robustness than using each model individually.
answer:
A hybrid model utilizing both raw-audio and spectrogram information for speech enhancement tasks.

question:
The challenge of learning disentangled representation has recently attracted much attention and boils down to a competition. Various methods based on variational auto-encoder have been proposed to solve this problem, by enforcing the independence between the representation and modifying the regularization term in the variational lower bound. However recent work by Locatello et al. (2018) has demonstrated that the proposed methods are heavily influenced by randomness and the choice of the hyper-parameter. This work is built upon the same framework in Stage 1 (Li et al., 2019), but with different settings; to make it self-contained, we provide this manuscript, which is unavoidably very similar to the report for Stage 1. In detail, in this work, instead of designing a new regularization term, we adopt the FactorVAE but improve the reconstruction performance and increase the capacity of network and the training step. The strategy turns out to be very effective in achieving disentanglement.
answer:
disentangled representation learning

question:
Learning multilingual representations of text has proven a successful method for many cross-lingual transfer learning tasks. There are two main paradigms for learning such representations: (1) alignment, which maps different independently trained monolingual representations into a shared space, and (2) joint training, which directly learns unified multilingual representations using monolingual and cross-lingual objectives jointly. In this paper, we first conduct direct comparisons of representations learned using both of these methods across diverse cross-lingual tasks. Our empirical results reveal a set of pros and cons for both methods, and show that the relative performance of alignment versus joint training is task-dependent. Stemming from this analysis, we propose a simple and novel framework that combines these two previously mutually-exclusive approaches. Extensive experiments on various tasks demonstrate that our proposed framework alleviates limitations of both approaches, and outperforms existing methods on the MUSE bilingual lexicon induction (BLI) benchmark. We further show that our proposed framework can generalize to contextualized representations and achieves state-of-the-art results on the CoNLL cross-lingual NER benchmark.
answer:
We conduct a comparative study of cross-lingual alignment vs joint training methods and unify these two previously exclusive paradigms in a new framework.