In this task, you're given a statement, and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence clearly disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3' corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

[EX Q]: Statement: This Republican rejoinder grants that the House impeachment process was politicized but argues that 1) the Senate should be above such tawdry politics Choices: 1. While the Republican response accepts that the impeachment was politicized, it says the Senate should be above that. 2. While the impeachment was successful in the House, it was blocked in the Senate. 3. This Republican capitulation accepts that the impeachment was unfounded and that the Senate was not the place to air such dirty laundry.
[EX A]: 3

[EX Q]: Statement: Congressional debate has focused on two of our criteria, mission relevancy and gains through consolidation. Choices: 1. The debate has focused on ten of our criteria. 2. The debate has focused on few of our criteria, two in particular. 3. The debate has focused on few of our criteria, two in particular, according to the members.
[EX A]: 1

[EX Q]: Statement: I did not want to mention the name of the person who was actually in my mind. Choices: 1. I was dying to mention the people on my mind, so I did. 2. It felt unmentionable to speak of the person on my mind because I loved them dearly. 3. Mentioning the name of who I actually thought of felt unmentionable.
[EX A]:
1