Question:
Based on the premise "A passionate Dreyfusard, Monet supported his friend Zola in his defense of the French army officer falsely accused of passing secrets to the Germans.", can we conclude that "Monet defended Zola regarding false accusations of the French army officer, but regretted it later on."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
it is not possible to tell

Question: Sentence A: Their anti-government, anti-politics libertarianism could be the ideology of the future.

Sentence B: The people of now really like this anti libertarianism.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question: Deficiencies found during ongoing monitoring or through separate evaluations should be communicated to the individual responsible for the function and also to at least one level of management above that individual.
Deficiencies should be reported to the person responsible for the function and to at least one person in a management level about that person.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Problem: Here is a premise:
A naturalized German? asked Tommy.

Here is a hypothesis:
A German citizen? Questioned Tommy.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Sentence 1: "Callie told me.

Sentence 2: Callie didn't tell me anything at all.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: no

Premise:
"We have included descriptions of the entities we visited in appendix II."
Hypothesis: Descriptions of the visited entities have been added to the appendix for the reader to have a better understanding.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
it is not possible to tell