This is the content of an email: On Friday, November 16th, the UDCs submitted their joint plan for implementing the suspension of direct access. Parties have until, Wednesday, November 28th, to comment. The following are proposed implementation rules for which the UDCs seek Commission approval: 1. A DASR can only be processed if the customer name appears on the ESP List submitted to the UDCs on October 5, 2001. 2. In order to submit an ESP List the ESP must have a valid ESP/UDC Service Agreement as of September 20, 2001 and , for ESPs serving small customers, they must have in effect a valid Commission registration as of September 20, 2001. 3. For a DASR to be processed for a residential or small commercial customer account, the ESP must be able to demonstrate that the required third party verification took place prior to September 20, 2001. 4. Customers should not be allowed to switch from one ESP to another after September 20 unless the new ESP had a valid ESP- customer contract in place on or before Sept. 20th. 5. Seamless moves within a UDC's service territory will be allowed. 6. For customers on bundled service as of September 20, 2001 (but still under a DA contract), the UDCs are proposing not to allow such customers to process DASRs even if their names are on the October 5 list. 7. If all accounts of one ESP transferred to another as a result of a merger, then the situation is okay because no new DASR would be required; requests for one customer to switch from one ESP to another only allowed if the new ESP-customer relationship had a contract prior to Sept. 20, 2001. 8. Changes in customer identity allowed on case by case basis (e.g., if a customer changes its type of business it would not be allowed). 9. One customer can not transfer or assign its direct access service rights to another. 10. Processing of DASRs submitted for customers who attempt to opt into a community aggregation program after the suspension date should not be allowed. In addition to the above, the UDCs proposed three additional options for implementing the suspension. 1. The Commission should impose a DASR cut-off date (received and accepted). 2. If the Commission does not impose a strict DASR cut off, it should require that any ESP which wishes to have a DASR processed after the cut off to submit their account specific DASR information and ESP contract to the Commission along with an explanation of why the customer is eligible to receive DA. The UDC will not process the DASR until it receives an okay from the Commission. 3. The ESP certifies through an affidavit that a particular DASR was associated with a contract in existence on September 20, 2001 (the UDCs set forth a proposed affidavit.) If you have any questions, please call Jeanne

Subject: Implementation of the Suspension Direct Access -- UDCs' Plan

This is the content of an email: I did get your message and resume. I am waiting for a return call from a person in our IT group. I'll let you know what he says. DG

Subject: Resume

This is the content of an email: Susan: Please add the following to your memo: I(B) Footnotes #4 and 5 - revisit why FDI Act language is added. Consult with Richard Sanders regarding Process Agent, arbitration and Waiver of Jury Trial issues Footnote #22 - Sara to draft language providing for a mutual Termination Event Consult with Shari Stack regarding the need for the additional reps in footnote #55 Sara to confirm that language for footnote #73 can be used as part of our form for all counterparties II(A) Confirm that "ratings test" language in definitions of Letter of Credit and Letter of Credit Default works and is what credit wants Decide how "foreign bank" language in definition of Letter of Credit should work Confirm that our new Custodian language works for credit II(B) Can footnote #2 be deleted? Thanks.

Subject: Forms Issue

This is the content of an email: Attached is the referenced list. There are only 2 counterparties for approval on this list, and I have problems with each of them. Virginia Electric and Power Company is coming through as an amendment to add financial power. I still cannot open them up until we resolve directly with the company what issue, if any, there appears to be doing financial products with utilities under Virginia law. Notes in our database reflect that this was an issue and they were creating a marketing sub to do the business. I have a call into Credit to find out who their contact is, we will have to resolve this directly with them. Again, TXU Lone Star Pipeline is coming through as a division of TXU Gas Company, and that needs to be made part of the name.
Subject: Counterparty approval list for 7/20/00