[QUESTION] Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "A woman in a dark shirt and glasses looks at a digital camera."
Hypothesis: "A woman is looking at a digital camera."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
A woman looking at a digital camera is a rephrasing of looks at a digital camera.
The answer is yes.

Q: Can we conclude from "A group of firemen leaving a fire scene." that "Fire fighters have done their job."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
A: Leaving a fire scene implies that the fire fighters have finished and done their job.
The answer is yes.

QUESTION: Premise: "A couple of patron at a jazz club."
Hypothesis: "The people are listening to the soulful sounds of the performance."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?

Let's solve it slowly: Not all people listening to soulful performance are patrons at a jazz club.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

[QUESTION] Given the sentence "A man and woman stand at a stall in the street during the day." is it true that "Two people are using the restroom."?
Man and woman does not stay together always in the restroom.
The answer is no.

Q: Premise: "3 little kids are playing football."
Hypothesis: "The kids are on a team."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
A: The kids may or may not be on a team. They could just be tossing a football.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

[QUESTION] If "A kayaker crashes against the force of the wave." does that mean that "The river is dry."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A kayaker crashing against the force of the wave refers to river being not dry.
The answer is no.