In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: insult and non-insult. Insult is any lanugage or act that is disrespectful or scornfully abusive.

Comment: No, the Globe suggesting that this kind of thing is "why people vote for Trump" should be a wake-up call for idiotic folks who fail to realize that political correctness run amok is already causing people to tune out with each and every increasingly vacuous statement such as that which suggests that "chief" is somehow derogatory. Whatever happened to common sense? It's certainly missing in this zombie apocalypse that's sweeping the nation, and Gee is simply telling readers to wake up and smell the bloody coffee!
Insult

Comment: Good point, any theocratic philosophy is a threat to constitutional democracy. Canada had a blasphemy law.

Violent theocrats are much worse - regardless of their religion.

I only meant to say that The Premier was probably referring to violent Muslim theocrats which is essentially what an Islamist is. But the term is too close to Islamic and ends up stereotyping the religion.

Given that the Ottoman empire ended just 100 years ago, the link to religious rule is more recent in Islam. About the same time the Federal Reserve was created in America and they are still fighting about that!
Non-insult

Comment: Zzzzzzzzz
Non-insult