Q: Premise: "A bearded man in blue jeans on a skateboard is jumping over a shopping cart."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A bearded man in blue jeans goes around a shopping cart on a skateboard." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A: If one goes around a shopping cart one cannot jump over it at the same time.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

QUESTION: Can we conclude from "A football player in white is being tackled by a oklahoma university player." that "There are football players in a sugar bowl game."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell

Let's solve it slowly: A football player in white is being tackled by a Oklahoma University player does not indicate that the players in a Sugar Bowl game.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

[QUESTION] Given the sentence "A man wearing a yellow shirt is doing a trick high in the air with his bike." is it true that "A man wearing a shirt is on his bike."?
The man is doing a trick with his bike which implies that he is on his bike.
The answer is yes.

Q: Can we conclude from "A man in black shirt is binding wheat." that "A man binding wheat."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
A: A man binding wheat is equivalent to a man binding wheat.
The answer is yes.

QUESTION: Given the sentence "Four people walk down a city sidewalk- three facing the camera one away." is it true that "A dog barks at a cat."?

Let's solve it slowly: Four people that walk are inconsistent with a dog that barks.
The answer is no.

QUESTION: Premise: "Three asian people standing on a sidewalk with a street scene in the background."
Hypothesis: "Three asian people are sitting down inside eating food at a restaurant."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?

Let's solve it slowly:
The three Asian people are either standing on a sidewalk or sitting down inside eating food at a restaurant.
The answer is no.