IN: I need a volunteer. The "Vol" will be responsible for pricing all of The New Power deals in the market area. 99% of this activity takes place on CGAS. Who wants it? Certain people have expressed an interest in learning more about pricing, Tricia Spence, Joe Casas, and Beverly Beaty. I estimate it will take about 15 minites a day during the month, and about 4-6 hours during bidweek. I also believe this deal will go away effective 4/1/2001. Pros Will learn the concept of a physical bookout - will become a Sitara pricing guru like myself. Will learn a great deal about transport pricing. May lead into executing capacity on CGLK and CGAS - I will not turn this over until I am satisfied with the Vol's performance on pricing. Can easily be done after the work day crunch (this may be a pro or a con) Will learn more about the pricing curves and how physical deals impact the desk P&L. Cons Somewhat tedious - not as bad as it used to be. May have to anwser Dick Jenkins questions. I will have to assign this to Scott or Vickie if I don't get a volunteer. I will do the training - possibly in the evening or on the weekend, AND I'm very detail oriented. I will provide feedback on this persons progress and I take this part of the job very serious.

Generate a subject line.

OUT: Volunteer
IN: This is an email
I will be recruiting at Wellsley College for the Analyst Program on Thursday, September 28. I will fly back from Boston on Friday, September 29 and I should be back in the office between 11:30 and 12:00. My assistant, Patti Thompson (x39106) has numbers where I can be reached. While I am out of the office, the following persons will serve as key contacts: Gas Operations Bob Hall x36956 Leslie Reeves x37962 Steve Jackson x37070 Power Operations Jenny Latham x33982 Leslie Reeves x37962 DPR Mike Moscoso x35242 MPR David Maxwell x36983

What is the subject?

OUT: Analyst Recruiting: Out of Office 9/28/00
QUESTION: The Management Committee is invited to join the Enron Corp. Board of Directors on Tuesday, October 9th, for it's open Board session and lunch. Among other agenda items, management briefings will be made for both Enron Americas and Enron Energy Services. Please come to EB5001 at 9:20 a.m. on Oct. 9. A seated lunch will be held in the 50M dining room following the meeting. Thanks.
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: ENE Board Meeting - October 9th - NEW TIME!
Message Description: High Inventory System Wide OFO Message Date: 11/22/2001 Message Text: High Inventory System Wide Operational Flow Order (SWOFO) OFO Stage : 3 Inventory Level : High Noncompliance Charge : $5.00/Dth Tolerance Band : 0% PG&E's CGT has called a High Inventory System Wide OFO for flow day 11/23/2001. High Inventory: Customer supply is required to be within the tolerance band percentage of daily usage to avoid OFO noncompliance charges. Supply lower than usage is not subject to OFO noncompliance charge. Charges for Noncompliance: - Noncore customers with AMR and PG&E's Electric Generation charges are based on actual daily metered usage. - Noncore customers without AMR charges are based on ADQ or actual daily metered usage, whichever results in a lesser charge. - Core Procurement Group charges are based on the latest core load forecast. Please call the CGT Helpline 1-800-343-4743 if you have any questions. Gas Schedulers PG&E - California Gas Transmission
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: Operational Flow Order
The responsibility for granting access to the DPR and associated reports available through the Executive Viewer on line is being shifted from Scott Tholen's team to my operations team. (This makes a lot of sense, since it is our group that prepares all of these reports.) Fernley Dyson has requested access to this information via the Executive Viewer. In insuring a tight distribution list for these reports, please let me know via return e:mail or voice mail (x35926) that you would like for Fernley to have access to the Enron-wide DPR. Thanks.
Answer: Access to DPR for Fernley Dyson
Q: Rod: I took the liberty of summarizing my 14 1/2 years of work at Enron. Either you can use it in your discussions with Andy or I can (if we feel it becomes necessary). I get the sense that Andy (and Ben for that matter) may have lost sight of my contributions to the company. I thought this might help clear up a few things. I was a little "fuzzy" pre-1992! I would be more than happy to discuss this with you prior to a meeting with Andy. Thanks,
Propose a subject line
A:
Work History for AF discussion