Question:
Based on the premise "The precise application of the practices depended on the specific contexts of their organizations, but the approaches were consistent.", can we conclude that "The approaches were all bad."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
it is not possible to tell

Question: Sentence A: He lay down for two days but didn't improve.

Sentence B: After two days, he still wasn't better.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Question: Lifeguards are not common.
Lifeguards are common.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Problem: Here is a premise:
The third key element, obtained by extensive description and analysis, has three components.

Here is a hypothesis:
3 things go into the key element

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Sentence 1: They love the Backstreet Boys, Dawson's Creek , and wrestler Steve Austin, and their superficial sophistication hides insecurity.

Sentence 2: They are hiding insecurity.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: yes

Premise:
"that that it's gotten worse"
Hypothesis: It's even worse now.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
yes