Dear Louise- I had a request from Keith Fraley as he was departing... He is interested in purchasing from Enron the equipment used by his group for the mapping function. This would include a couple of PC's, a couple of servers and the big plotter. Is this something that can be pursued? Please let me know.. Thanks,
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: Mapping Equipment
Attached is the form I'd like everyone to use for tomorrow's reports. We will probably modify this and the ones to follow, so be prepared! Fletch
Answer: Utility Term Sheet Form 1
Here is an email: Geoff, Confirming per our telephone conversation today. We are done as follows (originator Steven Burnham): 1. November 1, 2001 through November 30, 2001 Your physical basis offer At Dawn, Ontario - 55 GJ/d Physical basis offer is +.20 US/MMBtu At Parkway, Ontario - 80 GJ/d Physical basis offer is +.30 US/MMBtu 2. December 1, 2001 through November 30, 2004 Your physical basis offer At Dawn, Ontario - 61 GJ/d Physical basis offer is +.20 US/MMBtu At Parkway, Ontario - 103 GJ/d Physical basis offer is +.30 US/MMBtu Nicole, Would you please complete the booking with these numbers, including the in-outs with Lambie's term book. Thanks.
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: Siemens deal - Parkway and Dawn basis offers (physical)
Q: Susan: Laurel Adams has an FX deal where RMT must be a party. The counterparty is a 100% owned Enron sub named "Compagnie de Papiers Stadacona". When I last checked, nothing shows up in the corporate database. However, I have verified the name, ownership, etc. with Jeff Blumenthal. I will separately email you the counterparty info that I have. We need a deemed ISDA for the parties. We should later do the ISDA when the information is available on the database (which could be any day, I suppose). I would just use our standard RMT format. Please assign. Feel free to call me or Laurel with questions. Thanks.
Propose a subject line
A: Deemed ISDA
IN: As of today May 9, 2001 Bammel has working gas of approximately 20.3 TBTU. Economics are favorable to keep injecting. I estimate that injections will average around 1TBTU per week through May 31, 2001 which would result in another 3+ TBTU beibng injected. At the current pricing level this means that AEP would owe Enron somewhere around $98 million. Is this something Accounting should be working into the AEP settlement to pay Enron on June 1, 2001? Should AEP be notified of the volume and approximate value. Is there anything that needs to be done contractually other than the original agrrement to facilitate this transaction? I just wanted to make sure everyone is aware! Please let me know your thoughts.

Generate a subject line.

OUT: Bammel Working Gas Sale To AEP
IN: This is an email
Mark, FYI, here is the latest update on our Q4. We are making headway and the list shows how we intend to make up the short fall. As I stated on my voicemail yesterday, upon our return from the holiday, I will be even more proactively managing the Q4 P&L. Have a great holiday. mike

What is the subject?

OUT:
4th Quarter Outlook - 11/17