input question: Select the correct sentiment of the following review: If you can make it thru "classic Meyer" titles/intro, you can wade thru anything. But would you want to? I did not find a lot there to dig my teeth into. I suppose if you go into it with low enuff expectations you will be delighted (a la Charlie's Angels.) But for my money I'd like a little something more, more visual, more moving. More. I feel like I'm begging for gruel @ the foot of the master . the mans got the goods . but he just won't share.
....
output answer: negative

input question: Select the correct sentiment of the following review: Spooks is enjoyable trash, featuring some well directed sequences, ridiculous plots and dialogue, and some third rate acting.

Many have described this is a UK version of "24", and one can see the similarities.

The American version shares the weak silly plots, but the execution is so much slicker, sexier and I suspect, expensive.

Some people describe weak comedy as "gentle comedy".

This is gentle spy story hour, the exact opposite of anything created by John Le Carre.

Give me Smiley any day.
....
output answer: negative

input question: Select the correct sentiment of the following review: Portly nice guy falls for a luscious blonde; she likes him too, but not for the reasons you might think. Little-seen black comedy from writer Pat Proft features very good performances by Joe Alaskey and Donna Dixon, yet it makes no lasting impact. It's just a quickie throwaway effort, helmed by Norman Bates himself, Anthony Perkins. Even on the level of B-comedies, the somewhat-similar "Eating Raoul" is a better bet. There's definitely an amusing set-up here; unfortunately, the picture has nowhere to go in its second act. An interesting try, but it misfires.

** from ****
....
output answer:
negative