In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Example input: Comment: President lied under oath about consensual sex...
Not the same thing as rape.
Example output: Sexual-explicit
Example explanation: This comment explicitly mentions "consensual sex" and "rape", and thus is sexual-explicit.
Q: Comment: You prove my point. I challenged you to read Hebrews and you either can't or won't. It is not an historical fact that church teaching has remain unchanged through the millenia. Trent, in my view, is Medieval and should go the way of the Inquisition and the crimes of the Papacy-such as screwing nuns with a torture chamber below the Papal bedroom with a channel to allow the screams of the victims of the Inquisition to reach His Holiness while he has sex.
Or go the way of the end to priests who shove the Host up a teenage girl's vagina in Philadelphia in our day, albeit decades ago. Or, why in heck would you want to crucify Jesus if you ever met Him? This is the theology of alienation. Dark theology breeds corruption and spiritual decay.
I DARE you to tell me you have read the letter to the Hebrews in the New Testament and that you are not brainwashed, as so many Catholics are.
A:
Sexual-explicit