Q: If To ensure admissibility in subsequent judicial proceedings, OSI performs its work in accordance with the requirements of the U.S., can we say that "The judicial proceedings are different in other countries."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A: it is not possible to tell

Premise:
"In the New York Times Book Review , Daphne Merkin calls Allegra Goodman's Kaaterskill Falls a throwback to a time before fiction turned graphic and interior and hot to the touch."
Hypothesis: Merkin calls Kaaterskill Falls a throwback to before fiction became very graphic.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

yes

input question: That'll make me an accessory to murder.' If this premise is true, does that tell us:"Due to that, I will also be punishable for the crime of being an accessory to murder."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: yes

Question:
Based on the premise "desire that that money not be spent well", can we conclude that "The money was not well spent."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
yes

Question: Sentence A: What's more, New York's current renaissance is happening because there is something to come back to.

Sentence B: New York's present rebirth is occurring because there is something to return to.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Question: Sentence A: yeah and or they found that Tomczak really wasn't a he was a good backup quarterback was what he was

Sentence B: Tomczak was a kicker.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer:
no