The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the small-talk strategy, otherwise output No. small-talk is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used for discussing topics apart from the negotiation, in an attempt to build a rapport with the opponent. For example, discussing how the opponent is doing during the pandemic or sharing excitement for the camping trip.

[EX Q]: Context: 'Ok, great - I can give you all of my waters in exchange for a majority of the food and half of firewood' 'Half of firewood? There are 3 so one of us has to get more. I would need more of that. ' 'Yep, I know there's three and no way to split evenly lol - can you give me a justifiable reason as to why you deserve more over me? Please convince me.'
Utterance: 'Well, food is the most important and you're getting that so I'm gonna need more of the others.'
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: Context: 'You're right. I do not plan on hiking so you need more food than me. If I am correct, would I get 3 firewood/1 food while you get 3 water/2 food?' 'That's what I could live with, yes.' 'We should be able to trade soon. I hope you have a great trip!'
Utterance: 'You too! Great birdwatching this season.'
[EX A]: Yes

[EX Q]: Context: 'you told me i not fair that why i told you are not fare,3 food for me will give 3 firewood for me, give 2 water for me, other we can end the deal and both we can forget the bonus' 'ok' 'then what will do ? if you ok for 3 food for me , 3 firefor you, 2 water for me , for this deal we can go forward?'
Utterance: 'of course not. you just took all the priority items and you still want two water. I am going to make the last offer. you take two food and two water, I take one food, three wood and aone water. '
[EX A]:
No