In this task, you will be shown a prompt from a judicial decision and multiple holding statements derived from citations following text in a legal decision. Holdings represent the governing legal rule when the law is applied to a particular set of facts. There are five answer choices for each citing text. The correct answer is the holding statement that corresponds to the citing text. The four incorrect answers are other holding statements. You should find the correct option. There is a <HOLDING> token in the position of the citing text prompt where the holding statement was extracted.

fraud under 18 U.S.C. 1341; and (3) violation of RICO section 1962(c) through conspiring to violate RICO sections 1962(b) and (e) . Plaintiffs RICO claims against the Business Council are barred under the doctrine of sovereign immunity. The Business Council is an arm of Community government, and as such is presumptively immune from suit. Plaintiffs have not demonstrated that this immunity has been waived. RICO contains no language which suggests Congress "unequivocally" waived Indian tribes' sovereign immunity, and Plaintiffs have provided no evidence of a Community waiver. Absent a congressional or tribal waiver, the Community, like other sovereigns, is immune from suit for alleged RICO violations. See Snowbird Constr. Co. v. United States, 666 F.Supp. 1437, 1440-41 (D.Idaho 1987) (<HOLDING>); see also McMaster v. State of Minnesota, 819
Holding statements: (A) holding that tribal sovereign immunity did not bar rico suit only after concluding that sue and be sued clause in tribal ordinance unequivocally expressed waiver of sovereign immunity (B) holding tribal sovereign immunity protects officers from suit in official but not individual capacity (C) holding that florida does not have jurisdiction in a suit by other persons against an indian tribe absent express waiver of tribal sovereign immunity (D) holding that a senior vice presidents signature to an agreement with an express waiver of sovereign immunity provision did not waive sovereign immunity because that right was reserved exclusively to the tribal council (E) holding that removal to federal court does not waive tribal sovereign immunity
(A)