In this task, you will be shown a prompt from a judicial decision and multiple holding statements derived from citations following text in a legal decision. Holdings represent the governing legal rule when the law is applied to a particular set of facts. There are five answer choices for each citing text. The correct answer is the holding statement that corresponds to the citing text. You should write an incorrect option. Even though there exist multiple wrong answers, we only need a single wrong answer. There is a <HOLDING> token in the position of the citing text prompt where the holding statement was extracted.

grievances with any individual or employee organization other than the Union with respect to terms and conditions of employment of bargaining unit members in the [ASEA]. When individuals or organizations other than the Union request negotiations or seek to represent bargaining unit members in grievances or to otherwise represent bargaining unit members in Employer/employee matters, the Employer shall advise them that the Union is the exclusive representative for such matters. Similarly, the Union will so advise individuals or organizations making such requests. 2 . Christensen v. NCH Corp., 956 P.2d 468, 473 (Alaska 1998). 2 3 . Jones v. Jennings, 788 P.2d 732, 735 (Alaska 1990). 4 . See, e.g., Doe v. Alaska Superior Court, Third Judicial Dist., 721 P.2d 617, 622-26 (Alaska 1986) (<HOLDING>). 5 . Guin v. Ha, 591 P.2d 1281, 1284 n. 6
Holding statements: (A) holding that state attorney general as member of executive department may assert claim of executive privilege (B) recognizing privilege (C) recognizing privilege under federal rules (D) recognizing as a matter of law executive privilege for governor (E) recognizing in the context of discussing executive privilege that law enforcement documents disclosing investigative techniques or sources should be minimized
holding that state attorney general as member of executive department may assert claim of executive privilege