Question:
Based on the premise "The case study was given a purpose-program evaluation-beyond that of illustration, exploration, or generation of hypotheses.", can we conclude that "The case study was given no evaluation."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
no

Question: Sentence A: Albert, there's a telephone here, isn't there? The boy shook his head.

Sentence B: Albert acknowledged that there isn't a telephone here.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Question: yeah and with what those guys get paid then they go out uh besides baseball and and advertise products or they they charge ten or fifteen dollars for a autograph
Those guys charge a fee of up to fifteen dollars for the provision of an autograph.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Problem: Here is a premise:
McCarthy comes on like a bracing slap of Aqua Velva, says the New York Times Book Review 's Sara Mosle.

Here is a hypothesis:
Sara Mosle writes for the NY Times.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Sentence 1: His involvement in Latin America was indicative of how he would mobilize resources to get something done, then go to such extremes he'd have to abandon the project.

Sentence 2: He would mobilize resources to accomplish a task but then go to far and abandon the project.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: yes

Premise:
"if i had to do automotive repair or or anything i love to do woodwork and too and it's a diversion because i know i'd really don't have to this okay so i think i like that because i know i don't have to do this but if if i were forced to do it that may be a different situation"
Hypothesis: I like to do woodwork and automotive repair, but if it was my job, I might not like it.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
yes