Sentence 1: no and you don't um you know if you usually can wear pretty close to the same types of things just with a jacket or sweater

Sentence 2: It's perfectly fine for you to wear similar types of things as long as you have a jacket
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: yes

Question:
Soon the moisture would ride high into the mountains and slice down again in shards of ice like razors.

Does it follow that "The rain will be hot and sticky. "?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
no

Q: If Jon saw something unfamiliar in the man's eyes., can we say that "The man's eyes had a familiar look to Jon."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A: no

Premise:
"They are foolproof, long-lived, inexpensive, and repellent to animal pests."
Hypothesis: They repel pests.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

yes

input question: there was another uh angle that i i started seeing as uh the Polish situation and some of the Soviet uh countries as it were uh they started coming into the news and you started hearing about some of their troubles and the like and some of their their crime problems it made me wonder just how the uh outlook of the future affects people's decisions to either commit crimes or how they live or whatever uh it seems like they the poorer the situation or the poorer the outlook the more likely they are to commit a crime If this premise is true, does that tell us:"Crime seems to be highest in the poverty stricken areas."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: it is not possible to tell

Q: If I'd like to run., can we say that "I do not like to run. "?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A:
no