In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: Trid,
Many Muslims state that those who state that they are killing in the name of religion are using religion as a shield, not acting in the name of Islam.

Output: Identity-attack

Input: Consider Input: Comment: Awwww. Poor white guy.

Output: Identity-attack

Input: Consider Input: Comment: Sylvia - I get your passion. Black and Brown men are probably very scary to you. But "unarmed" means there really should be no reason to use lethal force. Cops are trained to use a plethora of techniques that are non-lethal - it's just clear that more and more cops are surpassing their training and jumping to lethal force more quickly and, in many cases, unnecessarily - especially against black men and boys.

"Protecting" a community by labeling it "criminal" and brutalizing it is similar to the logic used by every dictatorship in history - speaking of ignorance. And not sure what evidence you have or logic you're using for your "...letting out white predators earlier so they can go back to predatorializing on white communities..." rant.
Output: Identity-attack