In this task, you need to write an incorrect answer to the given question. Along with the question, you are also given the correct answer(s) and the associated paragraph. An incorrect answer should be closely related to the content of the paragraph and/or the question but will not truthfully answer the question. Your incorrect answers should be similar to the given correct answer such that it will pose a challenge for students to distinguish the two. A good incorrect answer should prevent those who skip the paragraph from answering the question. The incorrect answer should not be trivial, in the sense that they should not be easily eliminated without reading the paragraph.

Example Input: Paragraph- Sent 1: Magnets are able to place a force on certain materials.
Sent 2: This force is called a magnetic force.
Sent 3: The force a magnet exerts is a little different from the forces you may normally think about.
Sent 4: You exert a force on a book when you lift it.
Sent 5: You also exert a force on the pedals of your bicycle.
Sent 6: In both those cases, those forces cause a change.
Sent 7: The change you see in both these cases is called motion.
Sent 8: Magnets, too, can produce change.
Sent 9: They can produce motion just like you do.
Sent 10: Unlike you, magnets do not have to touch something to exert a force.
Sent 11: A magnetic force is exerted over a distance.
Sent 12: Thats right, a magnet can push or pull certain items without ever touching them.
Sent 13: Thats how the maglev train works.
Sent 14: Do you know another type of force that does not require objects to touch?
Sent 15: These forces are known as non-contact forces.
Sent 16: Another type of non-contact force you may be familiar with is gravity.
Sent 17: Gravity too can cause changes in motion.
Sent 18: Gravity holds our moon in orbit without touching it.
Question: What is a magnetic force?.
Example Output: Force exerted by wind.

Example Input: Paragraph- Sent 1: The judge leaned back in his chair and beckoned to Mr. Andrews.
Sent 2: It was finished.
Sent 3: Spear was free, and from different parts of the courtroom people were moving toward the door.
Sent 4: Their numbers showed that the friends of the young man had been many.
Sent 5: Mr. Thorndike felt a certain twinge of disappointment.
Sent 6: Even though the result relieved and pleased him, he wished, in bringing it about, he had had some part.
Sent 7: He begrudged to Isaacs & Sons the credit of having given Spear his liberty.
Sent 8: His morning had been wasted.
Sent 9: He had neglected his own interests, and in no way assisted those of Spear.
Sent 10: He was moving out of the railed enclosure when Andrews called him by name.
Sent 11: "His honor," he said impressively, "wishes to speak to you." The judge leaned over his desk and shook Mr. Thorndike by the hand.
Sent 12: Then he made a speech.
Sent 13: The speech was about public-spirited citizens who, to the neglect of their own interests, came to assist the ends of justice, and fellow-creatures in misfortune.
Sent 14: He purposely spoke in a loud voice, and every one stopped to listen.
Sent 15: "The law, Mr. Thorndike, is not vindictive," he said.
Sent 16: "It wishes only to be just.
Sent 17: Nor can it be swayed by wealth or political or social influences.
Sent 18: But when there is good in a man, I, personally, want to know it, and when gentlemen like yourself, of your standing in this city, come here to speak a good word for a man, we would stultify the purpose of justice if we did not listen.
Sent 19: I thank you for coming, and I wish more of our citizens were as unselfish and public-spirited." It was all quite absurd and most embarrassing, but inwardly Mr. Thorndike glowed with pleasure.
Sent 20: It was a long time since any one had had the audacity to tell him he had done well.
Question: What was the judges result and did it please or displease Mr. Thorndike?.
Example Output: Guilty.

Example Input: Paragraph- Sent 1: After the 1998 embassy bombings, the U.S. government tried to develop a clearer picture of Bin Laden's finances.
Sent 2: A U.S. interagency group traveled to Saudi Arabia twice, in 1999 and 2000, to get information from the Saudis about their understanding of those finances.
Sent 3: The group eventually concluded that the oft-repeated assertion that Bin Laden was funding al Qaeda from his personal fortune was in fact not true.
Sent 4: The officials developed a new theory: al Qaeda was getting its money elsewhere, and the United States needed to focus on other sources of funding, such as charities, wealthy donors, and financial facilitators.
Sent 5: Ultimately, although the intelligence community devoted more resources to the issue and produced somewhat more intelligence, it remained difficult to distinguish al Qaeda's financial transactions among the vast sums moving in the international financial system.
Sent 6: The CIA was not able to find or disrupt al Qaeda's money flows.
Sent 7: The NSC staff thought that one possible solution to these weaknesses in the intelligence community was to create an all-source terrorist-financing intelligence analysis center.
Sent 8: Clarke pushed for the funding of such a center at Treasury, but neither Treasury nor the CIA was willing to commit the resources.
Sent 9: Within the United States, various FBI field offices gathered intelligence on organizations suspected of raising funds for al Qaeda or other terrorist groups.
Sent 10: By 9/11, FBI agents understood that there were extremist organizations operating within the United States supporting a global jihadist movement and with substantial connections to al Qaeda.
Sent 11: The FBI operated a web of informants, conducted electronic surveillance, and had opened significant investigations in a number of field offices, including New York, Chicago, Detroit, San Diego, and Minneapolis.
Sent 12: On a national level, however, the FBI never used the information to gain a systematic or strategic understanding of the nature and extent of al Qaeda fundraising.
Sent 13: Treasury regulators, as well as U.S. financial institutions, were generally focused on finding and deterring or disrupting the vast flows of U.S. currency generated by drug trafficking and high-level international fraud.
Sent 14: Large-scale scandals, such as the use of the Bank of New York by Russian money launderers to move millions of dollars out of Russia, captured the attention of the Department of the Treasury and of Congress.
Sent 15: Before 9/11, Treasury did not consider terrorist financing important enough to mention in its national strategy for money laundering.
Question: Why was FBI conducting electronic surveillance and used informants in major US cities?.
Example Output:
To gather information regarding Al Qaeda's cash flows.