[QUESTION] Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "A young tattooed man in shorts and flip-flops on a cellphone."
Hypothesis: "A man talks on a cellphone."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
A man talks on a cellphone is a man on a cellphone.
The answer is yes.

Q: Given the sentence "A soccer player attacking another player in attempt to get the ball." can we conclude that "A soccer player wearing blue attempts to get the ball from a yellow player."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A: A soccer player attacking another player do not imply that he is wearing blue.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

QUESTION: Given the sentence "Woman walking in front of a yellow building." can we conclude that "The woman is sitting inside of a blue house."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Let's solve it slowly: Walking is not sitting. In front of a yellow building is not sitting inside a blue house.
The answer is no.

[QUESTION] Premise: "A young woman hugs a younger boy on a black leather couch."
Hypothesis: "The woman hugs a boy."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
A young woman is a woman and a younger boy is a boy but described with age adjectives.
The answer is yes.

Q: If "People riding bicycles at night on a track." does that mean that "People riding their bikes at night."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A: People riding bicycles at night is another way of saying People riding bikes at night.
The answer is yes.

[QUESTION] Given the sentence "Children sporting their florida dolphin caps." is it true that "Kids don't have caps."?
Youth in general can be defined by the label children or kids. Either can or cannot wear caps.
The answer is no.