IN: Veronica, Attached is the Guaranty Amendment for Nicor Energy, L.L.C., which adds financial transactions to the existing guaranty. Please copy Jim Hunt at Nicor (jhunt@nicor.com) on you message. Once received from Nicor, the Amendment needs to be countersigned by ENA. We will also need a copy for our files when fully executed. Please call me if you have any questions. Stephanie

Generate a subject line.

OUT: Nicor Guaranty Amendment
IN: This is an email
As a result of our luncheon with the confirm desk yesterday, could someone develop a comprehensive list identifying all omnibus attachments? If you think any other pertinent information could be included, please feel free to add it. Thanks. Sara

What is the subject?

OUT: List of Omnibus annexes and attachments
QUESTION: The attached schedules have been generated with adjustment factors to reflect apparent over-estimation of customer loads, based on an analysis of EES meter data by Tim Coffing and on comparisons of past metered loads to previous forecasts produced. The impact of the adjustments lowers load totals by averages of approximately 100 mW in the NP15 zone and another 50-60 mW in the SP15 zone. These adjustments, which will continue to be refined with further analysis, have been discussed with Tim. Please call if you have any questions regarding these changes.
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: EES CA SCHEDULE for 12/16 and 12/17/01
Folks, since many law firms have failed to exit the dark ages, they continue to use wordperfect. To open this, don't launch. Instead, "detach." Then open the file that you've "detached" and it should convert from WP to word and you should be able to open it. Best,
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: First Amended Complaint
Jeff and Gerald, I wanted you both to have the following information: (i) the legal/regulatory research questions that the Upstream Storage Group (Paul Bieniawski, Miguel Vasquez & Eva Rainer) have posed to LeBoeuf Lamb (law firm) and Brown Williams (rate consultant) and (ii) the two Reports produced in response to such questions. The Reports were delivered to the Storage Group personnel Friday, July 27, 2001, and were forwarded to me by Bob Neustaedter last Friday, August 3, 2001. The cost of this work was borne jointly by Jean Mrha's Upstream Group and the Regulatory Affairs Group; Donna Fulton, Sarah Novosel, and Bob Neustaedter are the Regulatory/Governmental Affairs individuals involved in retaining Brown Williams and in recommending Larry Acker at LeBoeuf to conduct the legal/regulatory research. I reviewed the engagement letters on behalf of the Regulatory Affairs Department. The combined cost of these reports is about $100,000. I've done the best I can to be sure that the Upstream Storage Group does not "overlook" the Legal Department as it forges ahead into a transactional arena fraught with significant regulatory and accounting risks and traps. Gerald, as you have become involved with the development scenarios that involve a compression component, I think it would be wise to become familiar with the contents of both the LeBoeuf Lamb and Brown Williams Reports. If either of you would like to discuss the legal, regulatory or political implications of the attached, please feel free to give me a call. Steve
Answer: Upstream--Storage Group Legal & Regulatory Research
Q: Note, this log is slightly different from Clara's file--it does not include the A/R and A/P items. But, we will be updating that spreadsheet as well today. I've gone through the Termination letters that I could find, and have updated the sheet accordingly.
Propose a subject line
A:
updated Termination log