In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.
--------
Question: Comment: Oh Oh, Gene Ward is going to use this as an excuse to lock up our state capitol. Be afraid, be very afraid. They are coming to rape your women.

Answer: Sexual-explicit

Question: Comment: That's why I hate and loath liberalism, its always boils down to big government knows best..!

Answer: Non-sexual-explicit

Question: Comment: Pretty much. When you mock her for something half the English Electorate voted for and at least 11 other nations are considering then you ARE morally Corrupt. Disagreeing with that opinion is perfectly ok, but to call her out because she shares a common opinion is another.

She was a VP candidate a sitting US governor. The fact you disagree with her does not mean she lacks credibility. The attack dog media hounded her for saying just about anything and often quoted her in correctly. And you assumingly lapped it all up.

The Market response shows nothing. There are so many speculators out there trying to make money on what they perceive may affect the stock market that it actually affects the stock market. Long term trends will be more meaningful.

It is also being driven by ideology. Not just money. She didn't say anything about an "apocalyptic" one world government. She simply like many in Britain and America prefer autonomy over collectivism

Answer:
Non-sexual-explicit