You will be given a context and a verb separated with a newline character, and you have to answer if the given verb can be anchored in time or not. We say a verb can be anchored in the real timeline if and only if a verb happened in the past, is happening now, or is guaranteed to happen in the future. The output should be "Yes" if the verb can be anchored in time and "No" otherwise.

[Q]: Juan Miguel Gonzalez has made the right decision to travel to the United States on Thursday to affirm his desire to be reunited with his son, Elian. His presence on American soil is necessary to (dispel) doubts about his fitness as a father _ raised maliciously by Elian's Miami relatives _ and to end speculation that he is indifferent about reclaiming custody of his son.
Verb: dispel
[A]: No

[Q]: The ceremony will take place at the Truman Presidential Library. The venue was chosen to honor the announcement by President Truman of the creation of NATO 50 years ago, the State Department (said).
Verb: said
[A]: Yes

[Q]: On Monday, Spitzer called for Vacco to revive that unit immediately, vowing that he would do so on his first day in office if elected. Goldstein, who said it was thoroughly, thoroughly possible that the issue would surface in Spitzer's advertisements, defended the use of the issue by noting that the attorney general (has) direct impact on the issue of clinic access.
Verb: has
[A]:
No