In this task, you're given two sentences. Indicate if the first sentence clearly entails the second sentence (i.e., one can conclude the 2nd sentence by reading the 1st one). Indicate your answer with '1' if the first sentence entails the second sentence, otherwise answer with '0'.
--------
Question: Sentence 1: Others argue that Mr. Sharon should have negotiated the Gaza pullout - both to obtain at least some written promises of better Palestinian behavior, and to provide Mr. Abbas with a prime prize to show his people that diplomacy, not violence, delivered Gaza. Sentence 2: Mr. Abbas is a member of the Palestinian family.

Answer: 0

Question: Sentence 1: Since 1987, however, Brazil has taken steps to dramatically reduce the destruction, including stepped-up enforcement and the elimination of tax incentives that led to large-scale land clearing. Sentence 2: In the early 1990s Brazil began to take action to save the rainforest.

Answer: 0

Question: Sentence 1: Legalization would eliminate the harms caused by prohibition, but it would not eliminate the harms caused by drug use. Sentence 2: Drug legalization has benefits.

Answer:
1