Categorize the comment on the basis of toxicity. If the comment is toxic (harmful, malicious, derogatory, threat, insult, identity attck, etc.) output Yes, otherwise output No.

[EX Q]: I'd like to announce that I cannot support Jeb Bush. Neither he or his brother George Walker Bush have done our country any favors.

Look at GW's record and the top of his list of 'accomplishments' include a war that has lasted fifteen years.... so far. An Economic collapse that he was lucky enough to pass off on his successor. And last but not least, the largest expansion in the size and power of government ever.

And these guys want us to think that they are 'conservative'?
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: "Now who do I blame?" he asked, pointing to the audience. "The people. A bunch of idiots following Pied Piper over the edge of the cliff."

Probably not the way to endear yourself to the sizable Trump electorate in Alaska.
[EX A]: Yes

[EX Q]: Didn't see blazo's comment until after. Yeah and the same could be said to bring pot into the argument. Imagine the difference you'd see at international soccer games if marijuana was served instead of beer. I'm wagering you wouldn't see soccer riots. Ok, heroin. Or oxycontin. Have you heard of people being stabbed shot robbed burgled etc for money to buy these drugs? All the time? Marijuana. How often does someone get robbed for pot money? Only in extremely rare circumstances where the idiot was already very mentally ill.
[EX A]:
Yes