You are given first 5 messages from a series of message exchanges between 2 persons playing the game of Diplomacy which is an American strategic board game. You need to generate the next message. The message should be generated such that it fits the context seen so far. Avoid the text that is (i) tangent to the context, (ii) repeats the context.

[Q]: ['Greetings, Germany. How are things up north?', 'Things are still shaking out but overall ok. France and England seem to be getting along nicely and will likely roll towards us soon.', 'France told me his main focus is to take out England before moving towards us, but that seems unlikely. Let's watch out for each other', '👍🏽', 'England didn't seem to be making any friends fast. Turkey looks like they've sided with Russia against Austria. Are you jumping on the anti Austria bandwagon? I'm trying to fend off Russia in the north.']
[A]: Huh, France has been pretty quiet to me, so I was assuming France and England were working together. Have you heard much from France? I probably will try to stay neutral with Austria a bit longer, we will see

[Q]: ['We should bounce in Bur this turn', 'Hi France! Sorry for the delay - still getting the hang of this app. Why do you think we should bounce in Bur?', "To start, I'd like us to have a good relationship, so I'm starting by telling you what I'm going to do, which is move an Army to Burgundy, ideally to bounce. This allows me to protect in case you were planning on doing something to begin with. Second, bouncing helps you out because Germany's first move with the Munich army is either to move to Burgundy or the Ruhr. If you dont move to Bur, then I'm there and you have to move the Ruhr army back to protect Mun anyway. I think we both have other issues than creating a relatively pointless stalemate here when there are better targets if we work together", 'Interesting. I will have to think it over. What does it look like three years down the road if we're working together?', 'England destroyed and divided, you in the north sweeping up Russia with support, ive swept down into Italy']
[A]: Okay - this works for me. I was going into Rohr will adjust my order and bounce. If we work together against England offers a lot of advantages for both of us, especially in the early game.

[Q]: ["Greetings, Russia!

We don't have too much to discuss early on, but I was curious on whether or not you were planning to move A Moscow - St Petersburg, where you could make a play for Norway.

And likewise, was curious whether you planned to order F Sevestapol - Black Sea, or else allow Turkey to occupy it.

It's early, but we might have room to cooperate against England or Germany in the future. Let's keep in touch. Good luck.", "I'd be very interested in organizing a group effort against Britain right now. I likely won't move to Saint Petersburg the first turn in case the Germans try something but I'm definitely bouncing in the Black sea.", "Understood, what's your plan then?

You might consider Moscow to Livonia, which would still improve your situation in the north (since you could convoy to Sweden and then build in StP), while also helping to cover Warsaw.

Or else you could just commit both of your armies to the south.", "I've spoken with the Germans, and a group effort against the British is likely. I'm still considering various ways to secure my position better, but I think keeping one army put in Moscow offers the best stability for the time being; If the Germans are telling the truth it will likely move to secure a spot in Finland in the second year.", "I would advise against staying put. Both Ukraine and Livonia can defend 3/4 of your centers. St Petersburg can't be attacked year 1 and the risk to Sevestapol is nominal in year 1, since even if he goes all out you bounce him out of Black Sea and he can only make an unsupported attempt from Armenia"]
[A]:
Going to Livonia is just as good for defending against Germany but gives you more options in the North