Categorize the comment on the basis of severe toxicity. If the comment is severely toxic output Yes, otherwise output No.

Example Input: Nels, I doubt it would change due to low morals and ethics of many who want the job. Even public funded campaignes sell out. Too much available easy cash under table. This is the way capitalist methods work. Buy any you can, scandal out of office those who you can't and if nothing else do as Alaska legislators do mock you and do what they are bought for. They are little wanna be Nixon's, Trump's, bama's, Clintons, Bush's, Cheney's, the list is endlist. This nation has never been anything but a nation of money and capitalist. Rape resources and stay rich. The wealthy and powerful whiners of "I am rich, I want, I will have. Its mine" attitude. Now I understand why so many nations hate us so much. All these ethics and DOJ are good for nothing but appease ire of public and saving face. They are not in place to protect any but who's go the most money.
Example Output: No

Example Input: Thousands turn out for Justin Bieber concerts too. It's still shit.
Example Output: Yes

Example Input: Eating while driving or drinking coffee from the drive thru? Is that not what reasonable people do, all day every day? Or drinking water. Better, certainly to tend to food and drink while the car is stopped and avoid accidents, but until there are "10 and 2" laws enforced (violating manual transmission user's rights to shift) I will maintain that accidents happen. The penalty is a ticket for the infraction and a fine, not to mention car repairs and civil litigation that the insurance companies will tend to. Eating a sandwich on my way back to work after visiting my sick mother in the hospital should not make me a felon.
Example Output:
No