input question: Okay, I thought, this is getting ridiculous. If this premise is true, does that tell us:"There was a lot going on at the same time."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: it is not possible to tell

Question:
Based on the premise "Welfare for flying rats.", can we conclude that "Welfare for flying rodents."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
yes

Question: Sentence A: Next week's cover 'Medical Miracle for Cute Babies Is a Hot New Trend and Proof of God's Existence.

Sentence B: Medical Miracle for Cute Babies Is a Hot New Trend and Proof of God's Existence will never be on our cover.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question: so yeah and uh what what i also eat now since i'm in college i have an Italian roommate and
I have a roommate that is Italian.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Problem: Here is a premise:
Rinnoji belongs to the Tendai sect of Buddhism.

Here is a hypothesis:
The Tendai sect of Buddhism includes Rinnoji area.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Question:
Prudie is not a betting parlor, but she sympathizes with you, having had her own doubts about that speech.

Does it follow that "Prudie was pretty sure that speech was inauthentic."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
it is not possible to tell