In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.
One example: Comment: Damn! Another cloudy day, and it's all Obama's doing!
Solution is here: Obscene
Explanation: This is obscenity because it hints on sexual content that is offensive to the public sense of decency.

Now, solve this: Comment: Morneau.........Trump..........Tomato/Tomato......All the same for the mega-rich. I am sure that Morneau would agree with Trump's new tax cut and how it helps the middle class (but really is engineered to give the mega-rich all the major breaks). Won't stop CEOs (like himself and his in-laws the McCain's) from cashing in their 'stock options' and creatively obscuring their tax responsibilities on these options.

Reminds me of the novel 'Animal Farm' where it was stated 'four hooves good but two hooves better'.

Was not Morneau in the 'Panama Papers'? Is not Trudeau's family accounting firm KPMG not in the Panama Papers?

Without transparency their can't be accountability. And this is not what politicians want. Such hypocrites.
Solution:
Non-obscene