In this task, you are given text for US Congressional and California state bills, your task is to generate a summary for this bill.

[EX Q]: SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ''Travel Facilitation and Safety Act
of 2015''.

SEC. 2. RECOVERY OF INITIAL PRECLEARANCE OPERATION COSTS.

(a) Cost Sharing Agreements With Relevant Airport Authorities.--The
Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection may enter into a
cost sharing agreement with airport authorities in foreign countries at
which preclearance operations are to be established or maintained if--
(1) an executive agreement to establish or maintain such
preclearance operations pursuant to the authorities under
section 629 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1629) and
section 103(a)(7) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8
U.S.C. 1103(a)(7)) has been signed, but has not yet entered
into force; and
(2) U.S. Customs and Border Protection has incurred, or
expects to incur, initial preclearance operations costs in
order to establish or maintain preclearance operations under
the agreement described in paragraph (1).
(b) Contents of Cost Sharing Agreements.--
(1) In general.--Notwithstanding section 13031(e) of the
Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985 (19
U.S.C. 58c(e)) and section 286(g) of the Immigration and
Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1356(g)), any cost sharing agreement
authorized under subsection (a) may provide for the airport
authority's payment to U.S. Customs and Border Protection of
its initial preclearance operations costs.
(2) Timing of payments.--The airport authority's payment to
U.S. Customs and Border Protection for its initial preclearance
operations costs may be made in advance of the incurrence of
the costs or on a reimbursable basis.
(c) Account.--
(1) In general.--All amounts collected pursuant to any cost
sharing agreement authorized under subsection (a)--
(A) shall be credited as offsetting collections to
the currently applicable appropriation, account, or
fund of U.S. Customs and Border Protection;
(B) shall remain available, until expended, for the
purposes for which such appropriation, account, or fund
is authorized to be used; and
(C) may be collected and shall be available only to
the extent provided in appropriations Acts.
(2) Return of unused funds.--Any advances or reimbursements
not used by U.S. Customs and Border Protection may be returned
to the relevant airport authority.
(3) Rule of construction.--Nothing in this subsection may
be construed to preclude the use of appropriated funds, from
sources other than the payments collected under this Act, to
pay initial preclearance operation costs.
(d) Initial Preclearance Operations Costs Defined.--
(1) In general.--In this section, the term ''initial
preclearance operations costs'' means the costs incurred, or
expected to be incurred, by U.S. Customs and Border Protection
to establish or maintain preclearance operations at an airport
in a foreign country, including costs relating to--
(A) hiring, training, and equipping new officers of
U.S. Customs and Border Protection who will be
stationed at United States domestic ports of entry or
other facilities of U.S. Customs and Border Protection
to backfill such officers to be stationed at an airport
in a foreign country to conduct preclearance
operations; and
(B) visits to the airport authority conducted by
personnel of U.S. Customs and Border Protection
necessary to prepare for the establishment or
maintenance of preclearance operations at such airport,
including the compensation, travel expenses, and
allowances payable to such personnel attributable to
such visits.
(2) Exception.--The costs described in paragraph (1)(A)
shall not include the salaries and benefits of new officers of
U.S. Customs and Border Protection once such officers are
permanently stationed at a domestic United States port of entry
or other domestic facility of U.S. Customs and Border
Protection after being hired, trained, and equipped.

SEC. 3. COLLECTION AND DISPOSITION OF FUNDS COLLECTED FOR IMMIGRATION
INSPECTION SERVICES AND PRECLEARANCE ACTIVITIES.

(a) Immigration and Nationality Act.--Section 286(i) of the
Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1356(i)) is amended by
striking the last sentence and inserting ''Reimbursements under this
subsection may be collected in advance of the provision of such
immigration inspection services. Notwithstanding subsection (h)(1)(B),
and only to the extent provided in appropriations Acts, any amounts
collected under this subsection shall be credited as offsetting
collections to the currently applicable appropriation, account, or fund
of U.S. Customs and Border Protection, remain available until expended,
and be available for the purposes for which such appropriation,
account, or fund is authorized to be used.''.
(b) Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002.--Section
10412(b) of the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002 (7
U.S.C. 8311(b)) is amended to read as follows:
''(b) Funds Collected for Preclearance.--Funds collected for
preclearance activities--
''(1) may be collected in advance of the provision of such
activities;
''(2) shall be credited as offsetting collections to the
currently applicable appropriation, account, or fund of U.S.
Customs and Border Protection;
''(3) shall remain available until expended;
''(4) shall be available for the purposes for which such
appropriation, account, or fund is authorized to be used; and
''(5) may be collected and shall be available only to the
extent provided in appropriations Acts.''.

SEC. 4. EXPANSION OF PRECLEARANCE AT FOREIGN AIRPORTS.

(a) Findings.--Congress makes the following findings:
(1) Preclearance operations provide the ultimate ability
for the United States to address potential threats at the
earliest possible moment and prior to departure, through the
forward deployment of officers of U.S. Customs and Border
Protection to last points of departure in a foreign country.
(2) With inspections and examination operations of U.S.
Customs and Border Protection located in a foreign country,
preclearance provides the capability to interdict, address, and
work with host-country law enforcement in furtherance of both
aviation security and border security in the United States.
(3) Under current preclearance operations, officers of the
U.S. Customs and Border Protection collect biometrics in the
same way that is currently done upon arrival in the United
States, in accordance with current regulation, and as part of
the routine entry process from certain aliens who are not
citizens of the United States prior to boarding flights
destined to the United States.
(4) Preclearance operations provide the best means for
existing and future biometric security capabilities beyond the
United States. Support for preclearance expansion will greatly
increase border and aviation security in the United States and
foreign countries.
(b) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that each
country designated as a visa waiver program country under section 217
of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1187) should seek to
participate in the preclearance program with the United States, to
jointly address security concerns through additional exchange of
information and to improve joint ability to secure the that visa waiver
program while maintaining the original intent of the program.

SEC. 5. BIOMETRIC DEMONSTRATION PROGRAMS AT PRECLEARANCE LOCATIONS.

(a) Authority.--The Secretary of Homeland Security is authorized to
select preclearance locations, including preclearance expansion
locations, and enter into an agreement with a foreign government or
airport to conduct a collaborative biometric demonstration program at
such a location to test emerging biometric technologies. The scope of
the demonstration program may encompass travelers other than those
utilizing preclearance at such a location, provided that such program
includes means for information sharing with U.S. Customs and Border
Protection operations.
(b) International Cooperation and Coordination.--Section 233(a) of
the Security and Accountability For Every Port Act of 2006 (6 U.S.C.
983(a)) is amended--
(1) in paragraph (1), by striking the period at the end and
inserting '', and to establish and maintain, in partnership
with foreign governments, demonstration programs to test
emerging biometric technologies at foreign airports at which
the Secretary has established preclearance operations.''; and
(2) in paragraph (2)--
(A) in subparagraph (A), by striking ''and'' at the
end;
(B) in subparagraph (B), by striking the period at
the end and inserting a semicolon and ''and''; and
(C) by adding the following:
''(C) lease, loan, provide, or otherwise assist in
the deployment of biometric technologies at foreign
airports at which the Secretary has established
preclearance operations under such terms and conditions
as the Secretary prescribes, including nonreimbursable
loans or the transfer of ownership of such
technologies, and provide the necessary training and
technical assistance related to the biometric
demonstration programs referred to in paragraph (1).''.

SEC. 6. VISA WAIVER PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS.

(a) Information Sharing Process.--The Director of National
Intelligence shall--
(1) develop a process to share information derived from the
Terrorist Identities Datamart Environment (TIDE) database and
the Terrorist Screening Database (TSDB), including biometric
and biographic information, with countries participating in the
visa waiver program established under section 217(a) of the
Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1187(a)); and
(2) not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment
of this Act, certify to Congress that such process may be
utilized by such countries.
(b) Continuing Qualification and Designation Terminations.--
Subsection (c) of section 217 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8
U.S.C. 1187) is amended--
(1) in paragraph (1), by striking ''Attorney General,'' and
inserting ''Secretary of Homeland Security,''; and
(2) in paragraph (2)--
(A) in subparagraph (C)(iii)--
(i) by striking ''and the Committee on
International Relations'' and inserting '', the
Committee on Foreign Affairs, and the Committee
on Homeland Security''; and
(ii) by striking ''and the Committee on
Foreign Relations'' and inserting '', the
Committee on Foreign Relations, and the
Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental
Affairs''; and
(B) by adding at the end the following:
''(G) Border security.--The government of the
country utilizes the process developed by the Director
of National Intelligence under section 6(a) of the
Travel Facilitation and Safety Act of 2015 to utilize
information derived from the Terrorist Identities
Datamart Environment (TIDE) database and the Terrorist
Screening Database (TSDB) for border security and
immigration purposes, including the screening of aliens
seeking asylum or refugee status in that country.''.
[EX A]: Travel Facilitation and Safety Act of 2015 This bill authorizes the U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to enter into cost-sharing agreements with airport authorities in foreign countries at which preclearance operations will be established or maintained if certain circumstances apply. Any cost-sharing agreement may provide for an airport authority's payment to the CBP of its initial preclearance operations costs. The Immigration and Nationality Act is amended with respect to reimbursements to the Department of Justice received from commercial aircraft or vessel owners, operators, or agents, or from any airport or seaport authority, for expenses incurred for immigration inspection services they have requested. Such reimbursements may be collected in advance of those services, and shall be credited as offsetting collections to the currently applicable CBP appropriation, account, or fund. The Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002 is amended to make the same disposition for reimbursements to the Department of Agriculture for preclearance of animals or articles at locations outside the United States for movement into the United States. The bill expresses the sense of Congress that each visa waiver program country should seek to participate in the U.S. preclearance program. DHS may select preclearance locations and enter into agreements with foreign governments or airports to conduct a collaborative demonstration program at those locations to test emerging biometric technologies. The Office of the Director of National Intelligence shall develop a process to share information derived from the Terrorist Identities Datamart Environment database and the Terrorist Screening Database with countries participating in the visa waiver program.

[EX Q]: SECTION 1. REQUIREMENT FOR FEDERAL CONTRACTORS TO POSSESS SATISFACTORY
RECORD OF INTEGRITY AND BUSINESS ETHICS.

(a) Defense Contractors.--(1) Chapter 137 of title 10, United
States Code, is amended by inserting after section 2305a the following
new section:
''Sec. 2305b. Contractor requirement for satisfactory record of
integrity and business ethics
''(a) In General.--No prospective contractor may be awarded a
contract with an agency under this title unless the contracting officer
for the contract determines that such prospective contractor has a
satisfactory record of integrity and business ethics, including a
record of satisfactory compliance with the law (including tax, labor
and employment, environmental, antitrust, and consumer protection
laws).
''(b) Information To Be Considered.--In making a determination as
to whether a prospective contractor has a satisfactory record of
integrity and business ethics, a contracting officer--
''(1) shall consider all relevant credible information, but
shall give the greatest weight to any violations of law that
have been adjudicated during the 3-year period preceding the
offer by the prospective contractor;
''(2) shall consider any administrative agreements entered
into with the prospective contractor if the prospective
contractor has taken corrective action after disclosing a
violation of law, and may consider such a contractor to be a
responsible contractor if the contractor has corrected the
conditions that led to the misconduct;
''(3) shall consider failure to comply with the terms of an
administrative agreement to be a lack of integrity and business
ethics under this section;
''(4) may consider other relevant information, such as
civil or administrative complaints or similar actions filed by
or on behalf of a Federal agency, board, or commission, if such
action reflects an adjudicated determination by the agency; and
''(5) shall consider the following in descending order of
importance:
''(A) Convictions of and civil judgments rendered
against the prospective contractor for--
''(i) commission of fraud or a criminal
offense in connection with obtaining,
attempting to obtain, or performing a Federal,
State, or local contract or subcontract;
''(ii) violation of Federal or State
antitrust law relating to the submission of
offers; or
''(iii) commission of embezzlement, theft,
forgery, bribery, falsification, or destruction
of records, making false statement, tax
evasion, or receiving stolen property.
''(B) Indictments for the offenses described in
subparagraph (A).
''(C) With respect to tax, labor, employment,
environmental, antitrust, or consumer protection laws--
''(i) Federal or State felony convictions;
''(ii) adverse Federal court judgments in
civil cases brought by the United States;
''(iii) adverse decisions by a Federal
administrative law judge, board, or commission
indicating violations of law; and
''(iv) Federal or State felony
indictments.''.
(2) The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is
amended by inserting after the item relating to section 2305a the
following new item:

''2305b. Contractor requirement for satisfactory record of integrity
and business ethics.''.
(b) Other Contractors.--(1) Title III of the Federal Property and
Administrative Services Act of 1949 (41 U.S.C. 251 et seq.) is amended
by inserting after section 303L the following new section:

''SEC. 303M. CONTRACTOR REQUIREMENT FOR SATISFACTORY RECORD OF
INTEGRITY AND BUSINESS ETHICS.

''(a) In General.--No prospective contractor may be awarded a
contract with an agency unless the contracting officer for the contract
determines that such prospective contractor has a satisfactory record
of integrity and business ethics, including a record of satisfactory
compliance with the law (including tax, labor and employment,
environmental, antitrust, and consumer protection laws).
''(b) Information To Be Considered.--In making a determination as
to whether a prospective contractor has a satisfactory record of
integrity and business ethics, a contracting officer--
''(1) shall consider all relevant credible information, but
shall give the greatest weight to any violations of law that
have been adjudicated during the 3-year period preceding the
offer by the prospective contractor;
''(2) shall consider any administrative agreements entered
into with the prospective contractor if the prospective
contractor has taken corrective action after disclosing a
violation of law, and may consider such a contractor to be a
responsible contractor if the contractor has corrected the
conditions that led to the misconduct;
''(3) shall consider failure to comply with the terms of an
administrative agreement to be a lack of integrity and business
ethics under this section;
''(4) may consider other relevant information, such as
civil or administrative complaints or similar actions filed by
or on behalf of a Federal agency, board, or commission, if such
action reflects an adjudicated determination by the agency; and
''(5) shall consider the following in descending order of
importance:
''(A) Convictions of and civil judgments rendered
against the prospective contractor for--
''(i) commission of fraud or a criminal
offense in connection with obtaining,
attempting to obtain, or performing a Federal,
State, or local contract or subcontract;
''(ii) violation of Federal or State
antitrust law relating to the submission of
offers; or
''(iii) commission of embezzlement, theft,
forgery, bribery, falsification, or destruction
of records, making false statement, tax
evasion, or receiving stolen property.
''(B) Indictments for the offenses described in
subparagraph (A).
''(C) With respect to tax, labor, employment,
environmental, antitrust, or consumer protection laws--
''(i) Federal or State felony convictions;
''(ii) adverse Federal court judgments in
civil cases brought by the United States;
''(iii) adverse decisions by a Federal
administrative law judge, board, or commission
indicating violations of law; and
''(iv) Federal or State felony
indictments.''.
(2) The table of sections at the beginning of such Act is amended
by inserting after the item relating to section 303L the following new
item:

''303M. Contractor requirement for satisfactory record of integrity and
business ethics.''.
(c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall
apply with respect to contracts for which solicitations are issued
after the date of the enactment of this Act.
[EX A]: Amends Federal defense contract law and the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949 to prohibit a contractor from being awarded a defense or Federal contract unless the Federal contracting officer determines that such contractor has a satisfactory record of integrity and business ethics, including compliance with all applicable laws. Outlines information to be considered by a contracting officer in making such determination, with an emphasis on any violations that have been adjudicated during the prior three-year period, as well as certain convictions of and civil judgments rendered against such contractor.

[EX Q]: SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE; TABLE OF CONTENTS.

(a) Short Title.--This Act may be cited as the ''Working Families
Child Care Act of 1997''.
(b) Table of Contents.--The table of contents for this Act is as
follows:

Sec. 1. Short title; table of contents.
Sec. 2. Findings.
Sec. 3. Assistance for low-income working families.
Sec. 4. Grants for child care supply shortages.
Sec. 5. Report on access to child care by low-income working families.
Sec. 6. Effective date.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

Congress makes the following findings:
(1) Availability and affordability of quality child care is
a major obstacle for working parents who struggle to remain
self-sufficient.
(A) Compared to all other income groups, the
working poor are the least likely to receive assistance
with their child care costs.
(B) Low-income families spend 24 percent of their
household income on child care, whereas middle-income
families spend 6 percent of their household income on
child care.
(C) 38 States have waiting lists for child care for
the working poor. Among those States, Georgia has
41,000 individuals on its waiting list, Texas has
36,000 individuals on its waiting list, and Illinois
and Alabama each have 20,000 individuals on their
waiting lists.
(D) One survey of low-income families on a waiting
list for subsidized child care found that of those
families paying for child care out of their own funds,
71 percent faced serious debt or bankruptcy.
(E) Half of the States and the District of
Columbia, even before the enactment of the Personal
Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act
of 1996 (Public Law 104-193, 110 Stat. 2105) during the
104th Congress, increased the proportion of child care
slots or dollars going to families on welfare, rather
than to working poor families.
(2) The Congressional Budget Office estimates that there
will be $1,400,000,000 less expenditures of child care funds
for working poor families as a result of the States
implementing the work requirements imposed under the Personal
Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996
(Public Law 104-193, 110 Stat. 2105).
(3) Important types of child care are not available in
certain States including infant care, school-age care, care for
children with disabilities and special health care needs, and
child care for parents with unconventional or shifting work
hours.
(A) A 1995 State study by the Comptroller General
of the United States found a shortage of child care for
infants and children with special needs in inner
cities, and a shortage of all types of child care in
rural areas.
(B) Only one-third of the schools in low-income
neighborhoods offer school-age child care, compared
with 52 percent of schools in more affluent areas
offering such care.
(C) Eighth-graders who are left home alone for 11
or more hours a week report significantly greater use
of cigarettes, alcohol, and marijuana than eighth-
graders who are not left home alone.
(D) Existing child care arrangements do not
accommodate the work schedules of many working women.
According to a 1995 statistic published by the
Department of Labor, 14,300,000 workers, nearly 1 in 5
full-time workers work nonstandard hours, and more than
1 in 3 of those workers are women.
(E) Only 10 percent of child care centers and 6
percent of family day care providers offer child care
on weekends. Yet one-third of working mothers with
annual incomes below the poverty level and one-quarter
of mothers with annual incomes above the poverty level
but below $25,000 work on weekends.
(F) Less than 30 percent of Head Start programs
operate on a full-time, full-year basis.

SEC. 3. ASSISTANCE FOR LOW-INCOME WORKING FAMILIES.

Section 658B of the Child Care Development Block Grant Act of 1990
(42 U.S.C. 9858) is amended to read as follows:

''SEC. 658B. FUNDING OF GRANTS.

''(a) Authorization of Appropriations.--Except as provided in
subsection (b), there is authorized to be appropriated to carry out
this subchapter $2,000,000,000 for each of fiscal years 1997 through
2002.
''(b) Appropriation.--The Secretary shall pay, from funds in the
Treasury not otherwise appropriated, $1,400,000,000 for fiscal years
1997 through 2002, through the awarding of grants to States under this
subchapter for the purpose of providing child care services for
families who have left the State program of assistance under part A of
title IV of the Social Security Act because of employment, families
that are at risk of becoming dependent on such assistance program, and
low-income working families described in section 658E(c)(3)(D). Funds
shall be paid under this subsection to the States in the same manner,
and subject to the same requirements and limitations, as funds are paid
to the States under section 418 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C.
618).''.

SEC. 4. GRANTS FOR CHILD CARE SUPPLY SHORTAGES.

(a) Grants for Child Care Supply Shortages.--Section 658E(c)(3) of
the Child Care Development Block Grant Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C.
9858c(c)(3)) is amended by adding at the end the following:
''(E) Child care supply shortages.--
''(i) In general.--A State shall ensure
that 100 percent of amounts paid to the State
out of funds appropriated under section
658B(a)(2) with respect to each of the fiscal
years 1997 through 2002 shall be used to carry
out child care activities described in clause
(ii) in geographic areas within the State that
have a shortage, as determined by the State, in
consultation with localities, of child care
services.
''(ii) Child care activities described.--
The child care activities described in this
clause include the following:
''(I) Infant care programs.
''(II) Before- and after-school
child care programs.
''(III) Resource and referral
programs.
''(IV) Nontraditional work hours
child care programs.
''(V) Extending the hours of pre-
kindergarten programs to provide full-
day services.
''(VI) Any other child care
programs that the Secretary determines
are appropriate.''.
(b) Authorization of Appropriations.--Section 658B(a) of the Child
Care Development Block Grant Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 9858(a)), as
amended by section 2, is amended--
(1) by striking ''Except as provided in'' and inserting the
following:
''(1) In general.--Except as provided in paragraph (2)
and''; and
(2) by adding at the end the following:
''(2) Child care supply shortages.--There is authorized to
be appropriated to carry out section 658E(c)(3)(E),
$500,000,000 for each of fiscal years 1997 through 2002.''.
(c) Conforming Amendment.--Section 658(c)(3)(A) of the Child Care
Development Block Grant Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 9858c(c)(3)(A)) is
amended by striking ''(D)'' and inserting ''(E)''.

SEC. 5. REPORT ON ACCESS TO CHILD CARE BY LOW-INCOME WORKING FAMILIES.

(a) State Reporting Requirement.--Section 658K(a)(2) of the Child
Care Development Block Grant Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 9858i(a)(2)) is
amended--
(1) in subparagraph (D), by striking ''and'' at the end;
and
(2) by inserting after subparagraph (E), the following:
''(F) the total number of families described in
section 658B(b) that were eligible for but did not
receive assistance under this subchapter or under
section 418 of the Social Security Act and a
description of the obstacles to providing such
assistance; and
''(G) the total number of families described in
section 658B(b) that received assistance provided under
this subchapter or under section 418 of the Social
Security Act and a description of the manner in which
that assistance was provided;''.
(b) Secretarial Reporting Requirement.--Section 658L of the Child
Care Development Block Grant Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 9858j) is amended
by inserting '', with particular emphasis on access of low-income
working families,'' after ''public''.

SEC. 6. EFFECTIVE DATE.

This Act and the amendments made by this Act take effect as if
included in the enactment of the Personal Responsibility and Work
Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996 (Public Law 104-193, 110 Stat.
2105).
[EX A]:
Working Families Child Care Act of 1997 - Amends the Child Care Development Block Grant Act of 1990 to extend its authorization of appropriations through FY 2002.
Directs the Secretary of Health and Human Services, from (additional) Treasury funds not otherwise appropriated, to award grants to States to provide child care services for: (1) families who have left the State program of assistance under part A (Temporary Assistance for Needy Families) of title IV of the Social Security Act because of employment; (2) families that are at risk of becoming dependent on such assistance program; and (3) low-income working families meeting specified criteria.
Authorizes appropriations for grants to States for child care activities in areas of the State that have child care supply shortages. Includes among such child care activities programs for: (1) infant care; (2) before- and after-school; (3) resources and referrals; (4) nontraditional work hours; (5) extending the hours of pre-kindergarten programs to provide full-day services; and (6) any other program the Secretary deems appropriate.
Requires State reports to include information on access to child care by low-income working families. Requires reports of the Secretary to place particular emphasis on such access.
(Sec. 6) Makes this Act effective as if included in the enactment of the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996 (Public Law 104-193).