The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.

[Q]: Context: 'you are not being fair, bare in mind we have same priority, so if you take all the food you have to give me the wood and water, or you can take all the wood and water and give me the food' 'you also not fare,you also not ready to give a give offer, give me 3 food , remaining one firewood one water 3 1 1' 'no, I think I will just walk away'
Utterance: 'bro u also not offer a good deal'
[A]: No

[Q]: Context: 'Hi there!' 'hello !🙂' 'What are your preferences?'
Utterance: 'I am about to go on a charity event with a kid from the make a wish foundation, I would like to get some firewood and maybe some food for his trip so he wont be cold and hungry at least.'
[A]: Yes

[Q]: Context: 'I am constantly thirsty and having water on hand is needed. Why is gathering food an issue for you?' 'I am not able to get around as much to gather the food. It could require a lot of walking and I might find nothing. What if I took 2 food, 1 water, and 2 firewood, would that be good for you?' 'How about I take 3 water and 2 firewood and you take the rest?'
Utterance: 'I think I can live with that.'
[A]:
No