In this task, you are given a part of an article. Your task is to generate headline (title) for this text. Preferred headlines are under fifteen words.

[EX Q]: An important use of machine learning is to learn what people value. What posts or photos should a user be shown? Which jobs or activities would a person find rewarding? In each case, observations of people's past choices can inform our inferences about their likes and preferences. If we assume that choices are approximately optimal according to some utility function, we can treat preference inference as Bayesian inverse planning. That is, given a prior on utility functions and some observed choices, we invert an optimal decision-making process to infer a posterior distribution on utility functions. However, people often deviate from approximate optimality. They have false beliefs, their planning is sub-optimal, and their choices may be temporally inconsistent due to hyperbolic discounting and other biases. We demonstrate how to incorporate these deviations into algorithms for preference inference by constructing generative models of planning for agents who are subject to false beliefs and time inconsistency. We explore the inferences these models make about preferences, beliefs, and biases. We present a behavioral experiment in which human subjects perform preference inference given the same observations of choices as our model. Results show that human subjects (like our model) explain choices in terms of systematic deviations from optimal behavior and suggest that they take such deviations into account when inferring preferences.
[EX A]: Learning the Preferences of Ignorant, Inconsistent Agents

[EX Q]: Passengers' experience is becoming a key metric to evaluate the air transportation system's performance. Efficient and robust tools to handle airport operations are needed along with a better understanding of passengers' interests and concerns. Among various airport operations, this paper studies airport gate scheduling for improved passengers' experience. Three objectives accounting for passengers, aircraft, and operation are presented. Trade-offs between these objectives are analyzed, and a balancing objective function is proposed. The results show that the balanced objective can improve the efficiency of traffic flow in passenger terminals and on ramps, as well as the robustness of gate operations.
[EX A]: Airport Gate Scheduling for Passengers, Aircraft, and Operation

[EX Q]: How to build a machine learning method that can continuously gain structured visual knowledge by learning structured facts? Our goal in this paper is to address this question by proposing a problem setting, where training data comes as structured facts in images with different types including (1) objects(e.g., <boy>), (2) attributes (e.g., <boy,tall>), (3) actions (e.g., <boy, playing>), (4) interactions (e.g., <boy, riding, a horse >). Each structured fact has a semantic language view (e.g., < boy, playing>) and a visual view (an image with this fact). A human is able to efficiently gain visual knowledge by learning facts in a never ending process, and as we believe in a structured way (e.g., understanding "playing" is the action part of < boy, playing>, and hence can generalize to recognize <girl, playing > if just learn <girl> additionally). Inspired by human visual perception, we propose a model that is (1) able to learn a representation, we name as wild-card, which covers different types of structured facts, (2) could flexibly get fed with structured fact language-visual view pairs in a never ending way to gain more structured knowledge, (3) could generalize to unseen facts, and (4) allows retrieval of both the fact language view given the visual view (i.e., image) and vice versa. We also propose a novel method to generate hundreds of thousands of structured fact pairs from image caption data, which are necessary to train our model and can be useful for other applications.
[EX A]:
SHERLOCK: MODELING STRUCTURED KNOWLEDGE IN IMAGES