In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Comment: More crap by leftists who only want their "approved" opinions aired. All others are of course racists and bigots and hate speech. Not how this country works sweetie. And by the way, it wasn't a girl the article was about - a girl has a vagina - not a penis and testicles. Maybe you need to educate yourself a bit more.
Sexual-explicit

Comment: I don't own an inch of property in Alaska. My frustrations with what's unfolded here politically and economically in the last few years are based on principle, not on personal gain. Wish I could say the same for the cowards in the legislature.
Non-sexual-explicit

Comment: "About 20 million Americans may have seen Russian-backed content on Instagram in the run-up to the 2016 U.S. presidential election, Facebook Inc disclosed.

The Instagram figures were in addition to the 126 million Americans who may have seen Russian-backed political content on Facebook over a two-year period, a number the company disclosed earlier this week."

--

Getting pretty hard to deny that the Russian efforts didn't have any effect on the election.

Trump, and the Repubs, have sought refuge in the theory that all the Russian meddling had no effect on the election and that Donald Trump won without benefit from Russian meddling.

So about 146,000,000 Americans were subject to Russian attempts to influence them to vote for Trump.

It's not possible that none, or even few, were not persuaded to vote for The Orange Ego.

And that's just Putin's efforts through Facebook and Snapchat, not including all the other platforms available to be exploited.

Trump, The Kremlin Candidate.
Non-sexual-explicit