Q: Premise: "A young boy weating blue shorts and cleats holding a football running from other boys."
Hypothesis: "Some boys are playing basketball."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
A: A boy doesn't wear cleats and use a football to play basketball.
The answer is no.

QUESTION: Premise: "A hockey player shooting for a goal in a professional game."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A hockey player shits for a goal." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Let's solve it slowly: Shooting for a goal and shoots for the goal is the same thing.
The answer is yes.

[QUESTION] Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "A man in a beret and a woman in a pink coat visit a woman selling baked goods from her tent."
Hypothesis: "There is a man in a beret and a woman in a pink coat."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
A man and a woman is the same thing as There is a man and a woman.
The answer is yes.

Q: Can we conclude from "Man mopping the floor with a bust in the background." that "Nobody is mopping."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
A: Either the man is mopping or nobody is mopping it cannot be both.
The answer is no.

QUESTION: Given the sentence "An older man in a dark turban is walking through a field with a tool over his shoulder." is it true that "Man going to his field."?

Let's solve it slowly: Walking through a field does not imply a m an is going to his own field.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

QUESTION: If "Rednecks throwing knives." does that mean that "The people are sharpening their knives."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Let's solve it slowly:
Not all people are rednecks. They cannot be throwing knives while sharpening them.
The answer is no.