Ted Murphy and I met with the Arther Andersen team this morning that accompanied us on our trip to Buenos Aires. We reviewed the observations and recommendations in written form that we had discussed briefly with you on our last day your office. After making a few changes, AA should be forwarding to you a copy of the draft document later this afternoon. We would welcome your comments and your additions on anything that you think we may have missed. Ted and I will be meeting with Rick Causey and Rick Buy within the next couple of days to discuss our operations and control review, so your responses would be welcomed prior to that meeting. I look forward to working with you and others in your office in my role over Global Risk Management Operations. In addition to overseeing common standards and controls for opeartional practices, I will work as your advocate for system and resource needs in order to insure success for your business plan in Buenos Aires.
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: Output from Operations/Control Review in Buenos Aires
IN: This is an email
Assuming we keep Arthur Anderson on board this afternoon and assuming Enron is still in the business of doing asset monetizations like this one (which better be the case since its in the TW 4th Q plan @$2.5 mm), the following things need to happen on roughly the following timetable: 1. Mike talks to Hanover and we negotiate the price, specific contract language, etc. (hopefully within 2-3 weeks of turning Mike loose?) 2. Regulatory (assisted by Maria and me) flanges up the FERC abandonment filing and tees it up to file the minute Mike finalizes the deal with Hanover. We haven't talked about this for a while, but the story we tell FERC has to acknowledge that the monthly O&M cost will be higher under our outsourcing deal than it currently is, if load factor and other operating assumptions remain constant. That may be the key to our story line--we

What is the subject?

OUT:
TW Compressor Monetization