Here is an email: Hi all, Attached please find some "stragglers" that need to moved into the bankruptcy books. These deals have also been added to the cumulative deal report saved on the O:\_Dropbox\Global Contracts - Estate Research (CYN'S)\Deals Reported to Risk (Phy) Master Cumulative List.xls. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thanks,
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: more deals to move to bankruptcy books
Q: Thanks for all you have done and for your continued efforts to see us through this difficulty. I can not begin to imagine the weight of your burden, but please know that I and I am sure most employees are behind you 100% and appreciate all you have done and are doing. I know you will see us through this and am delighted you are there to lead the endeavor. Are you assuming more responsibility for our low stock price than you should? Doesn't Ben Graham's Mister Market deserve most of the credit for our recent price swings? I believe strongly in free markets. However, for them to work there must be intelligent, well informed buyers and intelligent, well informed sellers operating in good faith. I am not convinced the U.S stock market has seen many of either over the last three to five years! My only hope is that the speculators, gamblers, short sellers, etc. all loose their shirts and that Mr. Market finally gets his courage screwed to the hitching post! Just get us through the exposures we have at our current market cap. and we will be in great shape a few years from now. Thanks again and best wishes.
Propose a subject line
A: I'm behind you.
IN: Jill, I was wondering if I could get some information on the Costilla deal, specifically the repurchase option. I need to know the term, locations, volume and strike price of the call. Thanks,

Generate a subject line.

OUT: Costilla
IN: This is an email
Almost two years after issuing a decision in PG&E's GRC, the Commission issued it rehearing order on October 16th and, lo and behold, actually granted TURN's rehearing request in part. The overall result is to reduce the capital revenue requirement by $24.8 million and expenses by $37.3 million. In addition, some portion of PG&E' estimated $171 million in electric distribution capital spending will be subject to rehearing. Listed below are the areas in which the Commission granted rehearing. 1. Electric Distribution Capital Spending. The Commission will, in essence, reopen the record, and allow PG&E to put into evidence how much it invested in its electric distribution plant in 1998. PG&E had used a 1998 forecasted amt of capital expenditures to develop its test year forecast. TURN argued that there was substantial evidence on the record that this amount was never spent. PG&E argued that the record closed prior to the end of 1998 so the best it could do was an estimate. On rehearing, the Commission agreed with TURN, that there was evidence that the forecasted amount was never spent, so they are allowing PG&E to prove it. The rehearing order states that any rates that are raised based on the electric distribution capital forecast adopted the GRC decision may be subject to refund. 2. Emergency Response Work This work category under electric distribution capital spending was reduced by $17.2 million. 3. Vegetation Management. The Supplemental Tree Trimming Program was reduced by $9.2 million. 4. Meter Reading. PG&E had primarily used accounting changes to justify the large increase in this service. On rehearing the Commission stated that PG&E had failed to substantiate those changes and reduced the allowed amount by $7.9 million. 5. Account Services. On rehearing the commission stated that PG&E had failed to show (a) why it cost so much more to provide services to CIA customers than residential customers ( $43.30 vs. $10.20); and (b) that money was not going for marketing activities that the Commission had disallowed in the previous GRC. The result was that the commission disallowed $20 million. 6. Customer Information Systems. The Commission disallowed $7.2 million as funds which ratepayers had already expended for CIS rewrites for which they had not received any benefits.

What is the subject?

OUT: Rehearing on PG&E's GRC
QUESTION: Today's Enron-wide Associates PRC meeting has been cancelled. It was scheduled to start at 1:30 today, following the Analysts PRC. Apparently, the Analysts PRC is running long. Since both meetings were scheduled for the same location and with Joe Sutton as the chair, the Associates PRC has been cancelled. I do not yet have a rescheduled date. I will let you know when I do. I am also sending an e:mail message to the Associates that I am representing so that they will informed of the cancellation. Thanks for taking the time to meet or talk with me about the performance of your respective associate in preparation for the PRC.
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: Associates PRC Meeting Cancelled
IN: MARKET NOTICE December 7, 2001 Enron's New Scheduling Coordinator ID ISO Market Participants: Effective Trade Date Tuesday, December 11, 2001 Enron Power Marketing, Inc. will begin scheduling energy trades and bids under a new Scheduling Coordinator ID. The former Enron SC ID, EPMI, WILL NO LONGER BE VALID. The new SC ID will be ENRJ. ALL Enron Power Marketing, Inc. related scheduling transactions within the California ISO scheduling systems will use the new SC ID beginning with submission of Day Ahead schedules on Monday, December 10th for Trade Date, Tuesday December 11, 2001. Transactions associated with Enron Power Marketing, Inc. (EPMI) that take place from December 2nd and the change date, Dec. 11th, will be manually adjusted in the ISO Settlements systems and will be reflected accordingly to include the new Scheduling Coordinator ID, ENRJ. As a result, Preliminary and Final Settlement Statements for Trade Dates December 2, 2001 through December 11, 2001 (and forward) will reflect the ENRJ SC ID.

Generate a subject line.

OUT:
CAISO Notification: New Enron Scheduling Coordinator ID