Question:
Based on the premise "As a comparison point, we also examined an alternative personal saving rate available from the Federal Reserve's Flow of Funds Accounts (FFA).", can we conclude that "We never examined the FFA"? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
no

Question: Sentence A: you know perhaps if we put money on the back burner that may that may choose to alleviate a lot of the problems i mean i mean we may not we may not have as high a standard of living but

Sentence B: Perhaps if we focus less on money, that would help with solving the problem.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Question: The administration's multipollutant proposal, a far reaching effort to decrease power plant emissions, was introduced as the Clear Skies Act in the U.S.
The administration had not decided on a pollution proposal.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Problem: Here is a premise:
we've been in here ten years

Here is a hypothesis:
We have been here for three years.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Sentence 1: Maybe things were really more logical here where the symbol was the thing, and all the steps in between thought and result were saved.

Sentence 2: It was a better method.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Premise:
"Station IX (Jesus falls a third time): Jesus's third fall under the weight of the croseis legend, and therefore the exact location is disputed."
Hypothesis: Station IX is where Jesus first fell.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
no