Premise:
"and he bought a used mower it was a real big heavy one and he said that that you know basically they they sold it on him because you know it was a macho thing"
Hypothesis: He bought a big, heavy used mower because it was more macho.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

yes

input question: David also founded the Abbey of Holyrood and created several royal burghs (towns with special trading privileges), including Edinburgh and Canongate; the latter was under the jurisdiction of the monks, or canons, of Holyrood. If this premise is true, does that tell us:"David created a number of royal burghs but Canongate wasn't one of them."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: no

Question:
Based on the premise "Jon was a changed man.", can we conclude that "Jon had changed a lot."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
yes

Question: Sentence A: A story chronicles Fidelity Investments' continuing troubles.

Sentence B: The story detailed the successes.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question: Still, his report raises potent questions about the Torah codes methodology, questions even Rips acknowledges to be serious.
Potent questions that even Rips acknowledges to be serious, about the Torah codes methodology are raised by his report.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Problem: Here is a premise:
Also, there were the rats.

Here is a hypothesis:
There were no critters.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer:
no