IN: This is an email
Janet, Attached is a clean and redlined version of the Confidentiality Agreement (Trunkline) with the revisions we discussed. Please review. Bobby Gaspard with Trunkline, asked that I forward the revised draft via email and after their review an executable. Please forward to Bobby for his review at bjgaspard@cmsenergy.com if you are okay with this draft.

What is the subject?

OUT: Trunkline CA
QUESTION: Subject: 11 Importance: High You have got to read this..........too much......read until the end...... > Original Letter: > > The date of the attack: 9/11 - 9 + 1 + 1 = 11 > September 11th is the 254th day of the year: 2 + 5 + 4 = 11 > After September 11th there are 111 days left to the end of the year. > 119 is the area code to Iraq/Iran. 1 + 1 + 9 = 11 > Twin Towers - standing side by side, looks like the number 11 > The first plane to hit the towers was Flight 11 > > I Have More....... > State of New York - The 11th State added to the Union > New York City - 11 Letters > Afghanistan - 11 Letters > The Pentagon - 11 Letters
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: this is way funny
Phone is busy so ..... Will have agreement shortly. Please send fax numbers (no electronic copy) where you want it sent. Hope all is well.
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: BECO Sales
Jeff: On our conference call on the SATO MoU a week back I promised to send you the DASH and press release on the 50:50 Swiss trading JV Enron Europe has recently put in place with the Swiss municipal power company EWZ. Note the DASH is draft only. Interesting precedent. Regards - Jeremy
Answer: SATO: Enron Europe Trading JV
Here is an email: Please terminate the following CNG contracts effective 6/30/2000. For June, we released this capacity to Energy Express. Boston Gas recalled this capacity effective 6/30/2000. I changed the deal tickets in Sitara. k# 560104 5A2529
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: CNG Contracts
QUESTION: Hi Dan, One more thing I want to mention. As you know, Enron has a confidentiality agreement with a competitor of Fuel Cell (I believe it is ONSI). The agreement has an exclusivity arrangement, which prevents the other company from chasing certain transactions without Enron. Once we really know what we are going to do with FCE, will it be necessary/advisable to waive the exclusivity provision to avoid any restraint of trade arguments? FYI, When I last discussed the other company with Ozzie and Heather on Friday, they were planning on calling the other company to tell them the general status without violating confidentiality obligations to FCE or CRRA. I will follow up to get the details of the discussion. Kay
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS:
FCE/Confidential