input: Former NFL Commissioner Paul Tagliabue on Tuesday rescinded punishments against four players in the New Orleans Saints bounty scandal.

The ruling overturned a decision made in October by Roger Goodell, the current commissioner, against Jonathan Vilma, Anthony Hargrove, Will Smith and Scott Fujita.

SI: Goodell the big loser here

Under the bounty program, Tagliabue wrote, Saints players were given incentives during the 2009 through 2011 seasons to render opposing players unable to play. They were called "cartoffs" and "knockouts."

In addition, it was alleged that the Saints offered a bounty for injuring Minnesota Vikings quarterback Brett Favre during the NFC Championship game in January 2010.

In October, after he upheld suspensions, Goodell appointed Tagliabue to review player appeals.

In his 18-page order, Tagliabue found that Fujita's actions "were not conduct detrimental" and vacated a one-game suspension imposed by Goodell.

Tagliabue wrote that Fujita "did not participate in the program including cartoffs and knockouts and that his participation in a 'non-injury' pay-for-performance pool is typically subject only to club discipline."

Tagliabue found that Hargrove, Smith and Vilma engaged in "conduct detrimental to the integrity of, and public confidence in, the game of professional football," but ordered their punishments also be rescinded.

Read Tagliabue's ruling (PDF)

Hargrove had been suspended for seven games but was credited with having served five. Goodell found that Hargrove falsely answered an NFL investigator's questions about the misconduct.

But Tagliabue said it was not clear Hargrove lied about the program and noted that he was "under tremendous pressure to follow the chain of command in order to keep his job." Tagliabue concluded that there was insufficient evidence that Hargrove's alleged misconduct merited a suspension. 1. Whose decision was overturned?
2. What is the name of the second player mentioned?
3. And of the third?
4. What quarterback was targeted for injury by the Saints?
5. What team did he play for?
6. During what game was his bounty offered?
7. When was that game held?
8. Does Tagliabue say that Fujita took part in the bounties?
9. What did the bounty program call injuries to opponents?
10. For which team did the four players involved in scandal play?
11. What motivation does Tagliablue see for Hargrove to have lied?
12. In order to retain what?
13. True or False: Tagliabue is certain that Hargrove lied.
14. For how many games had Hargrove been suspended?
15. Did he complete the entire suspension?
16. How many games did he sit out?
17. How long was Tagliabue's order?
18. Did he overturn Fujita's punishment?
19. Who had ordered this punishment?
20. What state do the Vikings play for/ Return numbered answers in your output.

output: 1. Roger Goodell
2. Anthony Hargrove
3. Will Smith
4. Brett Favre
5. Vikings
6. NFC Championship
7. January 2010
8. no
9. cartoffs and knockouts
10. Saints
11. pressure to follow the chain of command
12. his job
13. false
14. Seven
15. no
16. five
17. 18 pages
18. yes
19. Goodell
20. Minnesota Vikings

input: (CNN) -- A federal appeals court has upheld an obstruction of justice conviction against Barry Bonds, according to court documents released Friday. The court ruled that the evasiveness of the testimony the former baseball star gave to a grand jury investigating sales of performance-enhancing drugs was sufficient to convict him.

In an opinion filed by the U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, Judge Mary M. Schroeder said the three-judge panel rejected Bonds' contention that he could only have been indicted for obstruction if his testimony had been flatly false. Attorneys for Bonds had argued that Bonds' statements to the grand jury were factually true, and that language in the federal statute under which he was charged is unconstitutionally vague.

The appeals court rejected that argument.

"When factually true statements are misleading or evasive, they can prevent the grand jury from obtaining truthful and responsive answers," Schroeder wrote. "They may therefore obstruct and impede the administration of justice within the meaning of the federal criminal statute."

Bonds' testimony in December 2003 was part of an investigation that targeted his personal trainer, Greg Anderson, and employees of the California drug testing laboratory known as the Bay Area Laboratory Co-operative, or BALCO.

The testimony that led to Bonds' conviction came when a grand jury prosecutor asked Bonds whether Anderson ever gave him "anything that required a syringe to inject yourself with."

Bonds told the grand jury that only his personal doctors "ever touch me," and he then veered off the subject to say he never talked baseball with Anderson. 1. Whose conviction was upheld?
2. What was he convicted of?
3. When were the related documents released?
4. What court made the decision?
5. What was the name of the judge?
6. And her last name?
7. Did the appeals court accept Bonds' attorneys' argument?
8. When was the baseball players' original testimony?
9. Of what year?
10. Who were the targets of this investigation?
11. What does BALCO stand for?
12. Did Bonds ever talk about his sport with his trainer? Return numbered answers in your output.

output: 1. Barry Bonds
2. obstruction of justice
3. Fridayy.
4. federal appeals court
5. Mary
6. Schroeder
7. no
8. December
9. 2003
10. Greg Anderson and BALCO employees
11. Bay Area Laboratory Co-operative
12. no

input: CHAPTER V.

Lady Monmouth was reclining on a sofa in that beautiful boudoir which had been fitted up under the superintendence of Mr. Rigby, but as he then believed for the Princess Colonna. The walls were hung with amber satin, painted by Delaroche with such subjects as might be expected from his brilliant and picturesque pencil. Fair forms, heroes and heroines in dazzling costume, the offspring of chivalry merging into what is commonly styled civilisation, moved in graceful or fantastic groups amid palaces and gardens. The ceiling, carved in the deep honeycomb fashion of the Saracens, was richly gilt and picked out in violet. Upon a violet carpet of velvet was represented the marriage of Cupid and Psyche.

It was about two hours after Coningsby had quitted Monmouth House, and Flora came in, sent for by Lady Monmouth as was her custom, to read to her as she was employed with some light work.

''Tis a new book of Sue,' said Lucretia. 'They say it is good.'

Flora, seated by her side, began to read. Reading was an accomplishment which distinguished Flora; but to-day her voice faltered, her expression was uncertain; she seemed but imperfectly to comprehend her page. More than once Lady Monmouth looked round at her with an inquisitive glance. Suddenly Flora stopped and burst into tears.

'O! madam,' she at last exclaimed, 'if you would but speak to Mr. Coningsby, all might be right!'

'What is this?' said Lady Monmouth, turning quickly on the sofa; then, collecting herself in an instant, she continued with less abruptness, and more suavity than usual, 'Tell me, Flora, what is it; what is the matter?' 1. Where is Lady Monmouth?
2. Is it a nice one?
3. Who did the artwork on the walls?
4. Is he a good artist?
5. What color is the ceiling?
6. Who's union is depicted?
7. What is Lady Monmouth resting on?
8. Who was this room supposed to be for?
9. Who was under the impression it would be hers?
10. Who did Lady Monmouth ask to see?
11. Why?
12. Who had left the house by then?
13. How long had he been gone?
14. Where did Flora sit?
15. Is she good at reading?
16. Who starts to cry?
17. Had she been doing a good job with the reading?
18. What was Lady Monmouth doing while she read?
19. What is being read?
20. What does Flora want her to do? Return numbered answers in your output.

output:
1. in the boudoir
2. yes
3. Delaroche
4. yes
5. violet
6. Cupid and Psyche
7. a sofa
8. Princess Colonna
9. Mr. Rigby
10. Flora
11. to read to her
12. Coningsby
13. about two hours
14. by her side
15. yes
16. Flora
17. no
18. some light work
19. a new book called Sue
20. speak to Mr. Coningsby,