I am attaching a operating lease summary which I have revised to include some basic asset operation stuff. I've left Lisa a voice mail with a brief explanation of what we are doing, and asking her if she would take a look at this from a financing "fatal flaw" standpoint, with Enron being the lessor. I've been summoned to Nowhere North Carolina (Rocky Mount) for the remainder of the day and tomorrow, and will be back on Friday am. Anne, I hope this helps keep you moving. Lisa, many, many thanks. Kay Kay
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: CONFIDENTIAL/Operating Lease term sheet
I heard from Andrew regarding the status of a business continuity plan. Attached is a short presentation that he sent me that I thought you would like to see. Any interest in meeting with Andrew to get more detail? I plan to get with him. Let me know and I will be glad to set something up.
Answer: Disaster Recovery/Business Continuity Planning
Here is an email: October 18, 2001 Dear Ken, Ratan Tata, who attended Hank Greenberg's October 18 International Advisory Board meeting, and I talked on the margins about the Enron dispute. Ratan confirmed that Tata is interested in helping with a solution, provided that Indian government and the banks step in, deal with the equity and hold the investment while Tata works out acquisition details. Tata also confirmed that he has been approached by the Prime Minister's office and Tarun Das but the sticking points will include equity price, costs, etc. Ratan knows his negotiation is not with Enron. He agreed with me that you and he have shared interests in a settlement and that if you wish an informal conversation with him to ensure he and Enron are on the same page, he is open to a phone call or a meeting at a place and time convenient. In the event that such a conversation would not cross your wires, it seemed to me that if Tata and Enron are driving for a settlement from different directions, your interests would be served. I am sensitive to the fact that I am "out of the loop" and hope that my suggestion that you and Ratan talk does not complicate matters. Should you wish to speak with Ratan, his number in Bombay is 011 91 22 204 9131 or 3725. He leaves New York for Boston today and from there, he returns to India. Regards,
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: MESSAGE FROM AMBASSADOR WISNER
Q: I received from the TNRCC an NOV letter for the above facility for failure to submit an emissions inventory for 2000. This notification from the agency originally came to Rick Loveless by way of Wayne Brunette. I called the TNRCC and spoke to Kevin Cauble concerning the NOV and he pulled the emissions inventory submitted in 1999 for the facility. Because VOC's are the issue, I asked him what the emissions were for VOC's on the 1999 inventory. Kevin stated that the inventory showed VOC emissions of 19.50 tons/yr actuals and 33.56 tons/yr potentials. We discussed why EOTT would submit an inventory as it is not a major source and not required to. The only thing we could come up with is that EOTT may have anticipated an increase in throughput at this site and therefore, wanted to ensure that this facility was shown as a title V source. According to the phone records from the TNRCC for this facility, Craig Willoughby of Entrix had requested that the faciltiy be kept on the list of facilities required to do inventories. I have a call into EOTT to determine whether increased throughput is proposed for this facility in the near future. In speaking with Kevin, he suggested that if a determination is made that if there is to be an increased throughput that wont exceed the 100 ton/yr limit on VOC's, or that throughput conditions remain approximately consistent with previous years, EOTT should provide written notification to the agency that this facility does not meet the applicability requirements of 101.10 (emissions inventory requirements) and request that this facility be removed from the TNRCC mailings. Should EOTT confirm the status of operating throughput to be below the 100 ton/yr VOC emissions limit, I will make make written notification to the TNRCC requesting removal from the list.
Propose a subject line
A: Potential NOV letter from TNRCC to EOTT for Ozona Crude Station
IN: Under separate cover, I am faxing to you a copy of a "Table of Contents" for a collection of memoranda on various Brazilian issues (physical trading, derivatives, tax, etc. which I have copies of. I have also received from you this morning the response of Antonio Felix et al to the inquiry of Gustavo Junqueira. It will become increasingly difficult to monitor our progress with the Tozzini firm if the business people have direct contact with Tozzini and bypass the Enron lawyers. We will not be able to compile a comprehensive review and the requests will become disorganized. Requests for legal research by Tozzini should originate with the Enron lawyers and be addressed to the Enron lawyers. We can then discuss conclusions with our business people (and even meet together with Tozzini). I hope that you concur with this procedure. If you do, I think that it would be more appropriate for you to contact the Tozzini firm to convey the message (and also to our business people). Please call me when you are back in the Sao Paulo office if you have any questions. P.S. I will prepare for you the "mini-book" containing the memoranda referenced above.

Generate a subject line.

OUT: Brazilian Derivatives Issues
IN: This is an email
The first file is the Customer list from the Texas region perspective. The second list is the one from Barry that I have input phase 1 and 2 numbers for several companies based on the Texas region list and based on the companies that had already been chosen. Let me know if you have any questions. Thanks,

What is the subject?

OUT:
Customer List