input question: Brief intervention after alcohol-related injuries. If this premise is true, does that tell us:"Short intervention after alcohol related injuries"?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: yes

Question:
Based on the premise "Or, instead, should we fight tooth and nail to preserve and extend programs like the Earned Income Tax Credit that help the working poor?", can we conclude that "Programs for the poor are not considered."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
no

Question: Sentence A: the the heinous crimes uh even if it's one time offense

Sentence B: If it's a first offense, that should be taken into consideration.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question: hm time to go
It's time to go.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Problem: Here is a premise:
oh see yeah well if you if you liked Beetlejuice you'll probably like Edward Scissorhands if you didn't like Beetlejuice you'll probably won't like Edward Scissorhands

Here is a hypothesis:
If you enjoyed Beetlejuice, Edward Scissorhands probably won't be up your alley.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question:
Thus, there is a business incentive for any postal provider (who is not simply a cream skimmer) to offer universal service within the territories it serves.

Does it follow that "Postal providers do not desire to provide service to everyone in their territories. "?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
no