In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

Q: Comment: I read where that since 1530 it has been called "Spring Tide" atributed to the Moon, Sun and Earth's Rotation. Re naming it "King Tide" is just BS

A: Non-identity-attack
****
Q: Comment: Quote: "Michelle Obama is taking some heat for recent remarks she made on gender, but I'm struggling to muster outrage given the sheer incoherence of what she actually said."

True, I've rarely found what Michelle says coherent, but I suspect that what she's saying is primarily directed at black communities. She could have gone much further and bluntly stated that blacks coddle far too much the criminality and paternal irresponsibility in black males. (I won't call them men.) That's glaringly obvious and different from mostly white schools where ordinary boyishness is attacked as "toxic masculinity."

A: Identity-attack
****
Q: Comment: I understand. The nazis are being exposed once and for all. We are seeing who is for equality for all citizens and who are the white supremacists who post comments with trash like, "how about a black state? Would this make the black race happy?"

Perish the thought that you would view black Americans as equal citizens, dude. It's been 400 years. Isn't it about time you gave up your divisive anti-black bigotry and your white supremacy?

A:
Identity-attack
****