We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control) into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Q: Sent1: Gun hater pilot's lack of logic is to not allow law abding citizens the right to bear arms, and do nothing to protect the unarmed law abiding citizens.
Sent2: Criminals kill people so gun haters like gun hater pilot want to pass gun control laws that only law abiding citizens obey!

A: Similar
****
Q: Sent1: How can a people defend themselves from the government, unless they are able to maintain the same weapons as the government has?
Sent2: Making guns illegal wouldn't solve anything except to take them away from people that want to defend themselves.

A: Not similar
****
Q: Sent1: While it may be true that more illegal acts than protective measures are associated with guns, the extension to the average law abiding gun owner's habits is invalid.
Sent2: because I've made a legitimate point that not all gun owners abide by the law?

A:
Not similar
****