Premise:
"In 1999, for example, LSC grantees reported closing 1,038,662 civil legal cases relating to issues such as domestic violence, child custody and visitation rights, evictions, access to health care, bankruptcy, unemployment and disability claims, and many other issues faced by millions of low-income Americans."
Hypothesis: LSC grantees reported in 1999 closing 1,038,662 civil legal cases relating to many issues.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

yes

input question: This, he contends, will encourage the president to do a good job. If this premise is true, does that tell us:"The president will be encouraged to do the best job he can."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: yes

Question:
Based on the premise "Welcoming the decision in an editorial, the paper said it creates a No dictator or tyrant may cite national sovereignty to claim impunity from justice.", can we conclude that "The paper said that dictators often rise through military power and backstabbing."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
no

Question: Sentence A: That's the millionth time you've asked me that, at least.

Sentence B: I have answered your question at least a million times.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question: While some rode in across the bridge most of the Sticks attacked on foot.
It was easier for the Sticks to attack on foot instead of riding across the bridge.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Problem: Here is a premise:
She reflected that an ally in the enemy's camp, so to speak, was not to be despised.

Here is a hypothesis:
The friend in the enemy area was to be treated well.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer:
yes