Question:
Based on the premise "Please ask Jonah Goldberg (Linda Victimized or Vicious) to explain why he thinks, if all Tripp wanted to do was to protect her good name, she continued to tape Lewinsky long after she would have had enough evidence for this purpose.", can we conclude that "Goldberg thought Tripp had other motives."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
yes

Question: Sentence A: well it's been my pleasure uh Gina Gina is that with a G

Sentence B: I had a bad time with you Vagina.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question: and amazingly enough you're you're into Middle Eastern sort of coins the the largest amount of fakes of US gold is made in Lebanon
The biggest amount of fake US gold is manufactured in Lebanon.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Problem: Here is a premise:
Many worksharing discounts evoke responses based on more than one of the situations described above.

Here is a hypothesis:
Several of the described situations reflect the responses.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Sentence 1: We need to further examine and refine alcohol-screening questionnaires in the ED.

Sentence 2: We need to study what questions we ask of car accident victims in the ED.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Premise:
"To relieve the burden, he frequently goes for long drives or talks shop with his wife, Kiren Dosanjh, also an attorney and Cal State Northridge professor."
Hypothesis: The man often drives his car for a while or talks with his wife to relieve himself.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
yes