Q: Dear Colleague, GasTrader would like to offer you a COMPLIMENTARY trial subscription to GasTrader - the only natural gas industry publication that deals with today's critical issue of where natural gas prices are headed, and not where they have been. GasTrader features weekly analysis and commentary from the industry's leading forecasters, observers, and traders. GasTrader brings you short and long term weather predictions, useful for planning load and power requirements, as well as price trends, market outlook, and economic analysis. In addition GasTrader in its' Market Outlook section brings you no-nonsense trading recommendations for the wild and volatile natural gas futures. A key feature for those doing deals tied to the Nymex futures contract. Check out GasTrader's market recommendations from long time Commodity Trading Advisor and analyst Bill Burson. See if those recommendations help you do better deals and expand the razor thin margins so prevalent today in natural gas marketing. If you would like to receive your FIVE WEEK COMPLIMENTARY SUBSCRIPTION to GasTrader, please vistit our website, GasTrader.net and click "subscribe" or reply to this e-mail and include your name, company and address and telephone. The publication will be delivered by e-mail usually late Friday afternoon giving you plenty of time to formulate your trading strategy for Monday. I hope to hear from you soon. Sincerely,
Propose a subject line
A: Where ARE natural gas prices headed ? Check out GasTrader Newsletter
IN: Jim I am working on the questions for Ashley Brown. I should have a draft tomorrow, to be checked by Paul. In the meantime: 1) I am examining the currrent NGC system operator price control and incentive schemes under NETA. It is a radical change from the previous regulation. I would say it is a sophisticated piece of PBR. It includes penalties and incentives on internal and external costs (e.g. balancing) This document clearly states that the system would move away from central, merit order dispatch and would become much more self-dispatched. As a ramification, T rights would be defined on a pnysical basis. (far from our LMP, physical rights model). Your suspicion about NG proposal was right on targed 2) As part of the definition of Profit-RTO (which I think lends itself to multiple interpretations), I prepared this simple graph. In one of the questions we shoud ask Ashley where do they see themselves in the end-state. My feeling is that the Southeast Mediation Report advocated for stage II, NGC is stage III and the "textbook" RTO is stage IV.

Generate a subject line.

OUT: National Grid
IN: This is an email
Hi, Just wanted to get an update from you on the Citizens info I asked you about last week. I am wondering about the payment to John Cogan for Aug production and the EAMR payment due. Did you talk to Sarabeth about that? Thanks

What is the subject?

OUT: Citizens
QUESTION: To All: Please let me know your availability for a conference call next week on 10/1-10/3 or 10/5 at 2pm Eastern TIme to discuss the following: 1) Getting a EEI Contract Working Group organizational plan in place asap. The best antidote for preventing an Energy Industry Standards Board from taking over the EEI Contract management is to have a separate, well-defined and broadly-supported group in place. 3) Agenda and schedule for the next meeting of the Working Group. 3) Adding new members to the drafting committe. In particular, Noel Trask of the Excelon Power Team has asked to join. ASAP, I would like to get the optional provisions circulated earlier this week up on the website and through the listserver along w/ the announcement of our organizational proposal and future working group meetings. Thanks.
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: Availability for Conference Call
As we discussed yesterday, in our review of our DASH recommendation vs. actual performance we found 36 DASHes that have been approved since late 1999 that carry the recommendation "Proceed - See Other RAC Comments". Typically the RAC Comments describe substantial issues that must be resolved if the transaction is to be successful. Given RAC's increased visability and accountability for portfolio performance, perhaps a more forceful description than "See Other RAC Comments" would be desirable which could be something like: "Issues - Sr. Management Approval Required" Therefore, the four DASH categories would be as follows:
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: DASH Classification - "Proceed - See Other RAC Comments"
No rush, but thought I'd throw this out there just ot get the ball rolling: Looks at this point like any of the presentation dates work for me, so I don't necessarily have a preference. Options for project (and I'm really just throwing stuff out there to stimulate thought): Analyze AOL/Time Warner merger My company, Enron, is accused by some analysts of being nothing more than a Merrill-Lynch, or a Morgan-Stanley, or a Goldman-Sachs, etc. These analysts claim that we should therefore trade at multiples that are in line with the investment houses. We differ in that view (for a lot of reasons that I won't go into here). Might be interesting to analyze strategies, differences, etc. Anyway, just some thoughts to get the ball rolling. I'm open to just about anything. Best,
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer:
Group Project