Per your request for year-to-date numbers: here's an example of what I could include in the daily EOL summary. Let me know if this is helpful for you, and if you'd like it included on the graph sheet. I think it might be too tight to fit on the page as it is, but there's no reason why we can't generate a two-page report. As long as we're going in that direction, is ther any other data you'd like to see in graph form?
Answer: Year-to-Date Deal Summary
Here is an email: Market Notice October 29, 2001 Market Participants: The ISO has been notified that effective HE0800 (beginning at 0700) October 30, 2001, CERS will no longer provide creditworthy backing of negative decremental energy bids and negative OOM sales (i.e. any bids below zero dollars). If for reliability purposes, the ISO needs a negative decremental energy bid, CERS has indicated to the ISO that it may back such bids on a case-by-case basis at its sole discretion. Accordingly, in continuing compliance with FERC's orders, the ISO will not dispatch any negative decremental energy bids or any negative OOM sales absent assurances of creditworthy backing. Please contact your Client Representative with any questions.
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: CERS Update
Q: Gentlemen - We are working on a non-disclosure agreement with eonxchange, Inc., a software company involved in the building, licensing and operating of "smart electronic exchanges" through the use of "thought-ware." The basis for the NDA is the disclosure between the companies of software products and ideas (associated with the EOL software) and discussions concerning a possible transaction involving either the purchase or long term license of some aspects of the products eonxchange owns. This possible transaction is in association with an ongoing project by ENW involving the EOL software. The original NDA provided was provided to ENW through a financial advisor to eonxchange (Houlihan Lokey Howard and Zukin Capital) and contained a unilateral non-solicitation provision in favor of eonxchange. We have responded a bilateral provision consistent with our standard non-solicitation provision. I have attempted to further limit this language so that it would only be applicable between eonxchange and ENW (and not affiliates/subsidiary and parent companies). This was, however, rejected by eonxchange. I have attached the most current provision below for your review, comment and/or approval. At your convenience, please let me know if the attached is acceptable for the eonxchange non-disclosure agreement. If any of you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me.
Propose a subject line
A: Confidentiality Agreement With EonXChange
IN: Southwest Gas currently views Enron Online but is afraid to transact physical volumes on it because they are afraid the payment terms on Enron Online are different than non-EOL trades. They stated that they reveiwed the EOL contract and that it does not address payment. I told them that the payment terms do not differ but they are asking for something in writing. Can you send them something.

Generate a subject line.

OUT: EOL-Southwest Gas
IN: This is an email
Please note! We have to perform emergency maintenance on the Quick Place server (nahou-lnww01) today at 5:00PM. This means that Change Control and other Quick Place sites are not going to be available for 2 hours. If you have any issues with this please notify the Solution Center.

What is the subject?

OUT: Server Maintenance - today at 5:00PM
Here is the information that you guys had asked about last week when we discussed WSCC coal. I added the railroads to the map and pulled some numbers for utilization and O&M costs for each of the plants we discussed. If you have any other questions let me know. Aaron Martinsen
Answer:
Western Coal