Given an Amazon customer review, write a title for the review. The preferred titles are under fifteen words.

[EX Q]: I have purchased almost a dozen NAS devices for SAN backups and most of them have been quite solid. For disaster recovery purposes, I have my SAN contents copied to two NAS units per volume for failover, with one set of NAS units always off-site. This Sonnet looked like a good buy and I, too, was happy with the look. With five 750GB SATA hard drives mine is a 3TB solution using disk striping and keeping one drive as a spare. One issue with this unit is that, while it uses a multipath 3124 chip, only on Windows Server 2003 can you implement software based RAID-5. On XP you are limited to disk striping or mirroring using Disk Manager in Windows after your've made these PASS-THRU disks. The biggest problem with this unit, however, is the poorly designed drive caddies and back-plane. These disks are removable, but they shouldn't be since the connection to the backplane is so 'iffy'. In fact, if I move this unit from one location to another I have to always re-seat one or more drives before the SATA card on the server or workstation can see it. Unless you are willing to play with the drives, popping them in and out until you get a good connection with the backplane, I would pass on this unit. Much more reliable units are the MicroNet SR4 (4TB) SATA units available for under $800. They can take a lot more handling because the drives are integral to the unit. This means if a drive fails you live with it or send the entire unit back for repair, but I've not see any issues with these, especially if you use RAID-5 with the SilImage Raid program included. An array on these units configured as RAID-5 is recognized by Windows Server as a single volume which is what you want. Also recommended are the Sans Digital TowerRAID TR5M-B units. They do have drive caddies, but are much better built. The trhoughput on these is much better than the earlier units Sans Digital put out.
[EX A]: A nice looking external SATA enclosure with a fatal flaw - poor internals

[EX Q]: This thing is great! Super accurate, comfortable. Yes, it looks like a knock off Razer mouse (I mean even the name is Fazer, and the R looks like some snake fangs). BUT, it really does hold its own. This has accurate movements within ~25 feet. I can lay in bed and play Diablo on my TV across the room (yes, with a small about of lag). But the thing just works. I've enjoyed it so much as the house, I've actually brought it to work with me. If it had a spot to store the USB dongle, I'd probably take it everywhere in my bag.
[EX A]: It works, and it works very well!

[EX Q]: We bought all 3 of our daughters (4,7, and 9) Kindle Fire's for Christmas and wanted to protect our investment. Our whole family loves these cases. My girls love the handle and the colors, and we love the protection. The case is not a hard plastic, but a soft pliable one. I prefer this as it is easy to get the Kindle in and out. The only thing is that it is a little hard to get the power cord and headphones cords in, but it is in no way a deal breaker for us.
[EX A]:
Great product for our investment.