QUESTION: Paul: Enjoyed your talk in San Antonio. Now for the real issues: could you send to me the confirmation templates that you have devised for credit derivatives in the UK? Also, are there any other materials which might be helpful in the credit derivatives area? Shari has passed this on to me and I'm reviewing a couple of Deutsche Bank transactions executed last month. Thanks. Sara
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: Credit Derivatives
You had to hit below the belt. We were having a friendly shit talking contest, which, by the way, you started, and then you took the gloves off. What's up with that?
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: BRUTAL
9.6 Additional Factory Testing . In the event that Purchaser reasonably determines that a factory test=20 conducted by Seller or its Subcontractors was not conducted properly or the= =20 results of the test were inconclusive Purchaser may required Seller to repe= at=20 such test in a fashion as to obtain conclusive results. =20 Purchaser may request Seller or its Subcontractors to perform one or more = of=20 its factory tests using more precise instrumentation than planned, or=20 conduct a test not in Seller=01,s or its Subcontractor=01,s standard factor= y test=20 program. In the case of a Purchaser request for an additional non standard= =20 factory test the conduct of such test shall be subject to mutual agreement = by=20 the parties. =20 In the event as a result of such Purchaser requested repeat test, ormore=20 precise instrumentation or non standard test the Equipment is found to not= =20 be compliant with the requirements of this Agreement, Seller shall correct= =20 such noncompliance and the cost and time associated with such testing shall= =20 be to Seller=01,s account. If the Equipment is found to be compliant with = this=20 Agreement, Seller shall be eligible for a Change Orderfor the cost and time= =20 associated with such testing.
Answer: World Hunger- Section 9.6 Additional tests - text of attachment
Here is an email: The cancer journey is sometimes lonely and frustrating for both those suffering with the disease and those providing care. But it can also be a time of friendship, personal growth, humor, and fulfillment. Please join Marlene Lockey, Sr. Social Work Counselor at MD Anderson Cancer Center on Wednesday, August 15, 2001 at 11:30 a.m. in the Forum in 2AC (12th floor) for a Brown Bag session on "Caring for the Caregiver." Marlene has many stories to share, as well as many ways to cope with the challenges of living with cancer. The presentation will be followed by an audience discussion, so please bring your questions and experiences. Contact Laura Herrera -laura.herrera@enron.com - if you would like to attend.
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: "Caring for the Caregiver" - MD Anderson Brown Bag"
Q: Contract 04603 was suspended at 11/30/2001 08:35:46 PG&E National Energy Group and any other company referenced herein that uses the PG&E name or logo are not the same company as Pacific Gas and Electric Company, the regulated California utility. Neither PG&E National Energy Group nor these other referenced companies are regulated by the California Public Utilities Commission. Customers of Pacific Gas and Electric Company do not have to buy products from these companies in order to continue to receive quality regulated services from the utility.
Propose a subject line
A: e-Trans Contract Administration
Here is an email: As detailed in the attached FERC notice, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has approved FERC's Information Collection Request for "Reporting of Natural Gas Sales to the California Market" through the six-month emergency period that will expire on 1/31/02. (Emergency reporting requirements are automatically approved for six months under the OMB regulations.) However, it gave FERC several conditions that would have to be met before the reporting requirements could be extended. OMB has advised FERC that, if it decides to request renewal of the Information Collection Request after that date, it must address certain issues as part of its supporting statement (more specifically, "include an explicit discussion"). As you may remember, in addition to requesting rehearing of the FERC order, ENA and EES submitted comments to OMB regarding our problems with FERC's estimate of the burden on affected companies of the proposed collection of information. We pointed out that we do not manage our business in the manner contemplated by the reporting requirements, much less keep our records in that manner. We manage our business on an aggregated basis, and complying with the requirements will require us to implement significant manual review and analysis to arbitrarily define the components of a sale. We stated that we might even have to hire full-time staff to dedicate to the task. The issues that we raised in our comments are the same ones that OMB requires FERC to address if they submit a request for approval to extend the reporting requirements past 1/31/02. (FERC indicated in its July order that it intended to extend the reporting requirement through 9/30/02 to coincide with the end date of its mitigation plan.) OMB questioned the practical utility of requiring disaggregated data when "commenters" reported that they did not maintain the data in a way that allowed them to report it that way. OMB expressed concern that the data collection would require significant data manipulation in order to respond, and the resulting disaggregation would likely be artificial. OMB also required FERC to evaluate its burden estimates after "consulting with respondents", and it must provide a list of the names, affiliates, and phone numbers of the respondents it contacted. FERC has not yet issued an order on our rehearing request. While we would not expect them to withdraw the reporting requirements entirely, it may be that the OMB action will affect their final decision. At the least, it sends a signal!
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A:
OMB Response to FERC Reporting Requirements