In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: toxic and non-toxic. Toxicity is defiend as anything that is rude, disrespectful, or unreasonable that would make someone want to leave a converation.
--------
Question: Comment: You raise an interesting point. It's bizarre that we preemptively attack somebody like Trump while we ignore the damage being done by globalizing demagogues like Trudeau - and, to be fair, Harper, who unlike Trudeau probably understood the damaging impacts of neoliberal economic ideology - who prioritize the interests of global capital over the interests of ordinary citizens as well as democracy itself by promoting trade deals that are only euphemistically about trade.

Answer: Non-toxic

Question: Comment: The cop was stupid, he was set up.

Answer: Toxic

Question: Comment: He is no longer the head of the FBI and to answer that question in his current status as a private citizen would be inappropriate. There is a special investigator now assigned to get that answer. In regards to witnessing a felony, wrong again. In order to prove obstruction there has to be intent. In other words, he would have to know what Trump was thinking at the time. Perhaps Trump just does not know or understand structured protocol or chain of command within the federal government. With that said, I do believe Comey should have respectfully informed Trump that the conversation and what he might be implying was inappropriate. Comey at least did bring Sessions into the loop of what occurred. Our federal government, as clunky as it can be, has protocol and structure. It is not a fortune 500 company where the CEO can randomly make and change the rules on a whim.

Answer:
Non-toxic