instruction:
We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty) into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.
question:
Sent1: I think there should be a death penalty because, all those innocent people getting killed for no damn reason is unfair.
Sent2: With all this talk about innocent people being put to death, I was wondering.
answer:
Not similar

question:
Sent1: If you apply that cost to the rest of the nations executions, the nation has spent over $1 billion on capital punishment since the reinstatement of the penalty via Gregg vs. Georgia in 1976.
Sent2: On a national basis, these figures translate to an extra cost of over $1 billion spent since 1976 on the death penalty.
answer:
Similar

question:
Sent1: You should also note that the one scenario I think the death penalty is acceptable for is if they try to escape using violence or if they attack another prisoner.
Sent2: I say if they try to kill/escape from life w/o parole in prison that's all we should need for the death penalty.
answer:
Similar