Generate an explanation for the given claim using the provided supporting material from the paragraph. Please consider the following points while generating an output. 1) The claim will always have supporting proof in the paragraph, and the paragraph will have a clear point of view supporting the claim. 2) There can be instances where direct correlation to the claim is not available. Make use of the sentences in the paragraph to provide a corresponding output supporting the claim. 3) The explanation should be at least one and at most twelve sentences long.

Let me give you an example: Paragraph: "Although the story didn't cite the cost of appendectomy emergency or urgent surgery and we wish it had, we nonetheless will give it a satisfactory score because it at least cited what the editorial writer wrote, ""A secondary benefit is the savings to the hospital generated by minimizing staff and anesthesiologist presence late in the evening and during the wee hours of the morning."" As with our harms score above, although the story didn't give absolute numbers, in this case we think it was sufficient for it to report that ""The scientists found no significant difference among the groups in the patients' condition 30 days after surgery or in the length of their operation or hospital stay."" Although the story didn't give absolute numbers, in this case we think it was sufficient for it to report that ""The scientists found no significant difference among the groups in the patients' condition 30 days after surgery or in the length of their operation or hospital stay."" Despite running less than 300 words, this story did an adequate job in explaining the quality of the evidence, including pointing out limitations. No disease-mongering here. The story meets the bare minimum requirement for this criterion in that it at least cited what an editorial stated. The focus of the story was on a study comparing emergency appendectomy with surgery done up to 12 hours later or beyond. This is the whole focus of the story and one we applaud when it begins: ""Appendectomy is the most common emergency surgery in the world, but it doesn't have to be."" There were no claims made about the novelty of this research, and we may have wished for a bit more context on this. Nonetheless, the potential for guiding future care decisions was made clear. Not applicable. Given that the story only pulled excerpts from the journal article and the accompanying editorial, and didn't include any fresh quotes from interviews, we can't be sure of the extent to which it may have been influenced by a news release.". Claim: Some appendicitis cases may not require 'emergency' surgery
The answer to this example can be: We really don't understand why only a handful of mainstream news organizations reported this story. (At least in what we found.) The most common emergency surgery in the world. Rushing to emergency surgery may not carry any benefit. Waiting a few hours may be safer and less expensive. Why is that not a story? We applaud USA Today for finding time and space and clearly it didn't need to free up much space to do a good job telling the story. The story explains that as many as 300,0 appendectomies are done each year in the US. That figure alone explains why this is an important study to report.
Here is why: The output is an analysis of the claim while considering the paragraph as a reference. The output highlights the key features presented in the paragraph and explains the claim accordingly.

OK. solve this:
Paragraph: Former Ohio Gov. Ted Strickland found that out by offering what's usually benign praise of any presidential running mate, telling an audience on Monday that Kaine was, "wonderfully prepared" to "be the president if that ever became necessary." Asked the same day if there's more pressure to prove he's up for the presidency given Clinton's pneumonia, the usually folksy and expansive Kaine was curt: No, he said, he absolutely does not think that. He did not elaborate. As Clinton recovers from pneumonia and prepares to resume campaigning Thursday, Kaine is emphasizing instead that her "energy staggers me. I have a hard time keeping up with her." "She is working so hard, even pushing through. She got told, 'Hey, you're a little bit sick,'" Kaine told hundreds of supporters from the steps of the graduate library on the University of Michigan campus during a Tuesday rally. He characterized Clinton's response as: "'Well, I'm going to still go at it.'" Clinton's illness could put more pressure on Kaine to look more presidential instead of just relishing his usual role as political attack dog or top Clinton cheerleader. But Kaine can't embrace that too much without calling unwanted attention to Clinton's health. Clinton's illness was on the minds of some voters as Kaine briefly visited Michigan, a swing state that he promised was "going to be close" between Clinton and Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump in November. Kim Clarke chatted with Kaine when the candidate popped into a coffee shop just off the university's campus shortly before his Tuesday rally. Clarke told Kaine of Clinton, "it's OK to be sick," to which Kaine immediately responded that the illness wasn't a big deal and Clinton would recover soon. Clarke, a 56-year-old who works for the University of Michigan, said afterward that when she heard about Clinton's health problems "my first thought wasn't, 'Oh, Tim Kaine, what's going to happen." But she also said the stakes have risen for the Virginia senator. "You obviously want your vice presidential candidate to be of the same timber as the presidential candidate because things happen," Clarke said. "If that person were to have to step in, you'd want to know that they have similar leadership characteristics." During a campaign stop later Tuesday at the University of Minnesota Twin Cities in Minneapolis, 21-year-old Will Dammann gave Kaine a student government T-shirt. Dammann said he normally voted Republican but that he would support Clinton and Kaine in November because he doesn't think Trump is good for the GOP. "He's a very trustworthy person. He comes across as caring and assertive," Dammann said of Kaine's qualities as a potential president. But also said he didn't think it would come to that: "I think Secretary Clinton is going to be fine." Same goes for Alex Juntti, a 21-year-old English major at the University of Michigan who attended Tuesday's rally after his Ancient Law class. He said he still sees Kaine as more of a Clinton campaigner-in-chief than someone who needs to prove he's up for the presidency. "To me, this isn't his audition for a potential presidency," Juntti said. Claim: Kaine downplays presidential readiness amid Clinton illness.
Answer:
Tim Kaine's role as Hillary Clinton's vice presidential running mate means he'd be one heartbeat away from the presidency. Clinton's health scare, complete with a widely-viewed video of her stumbling and being supported by aides after abruptly leaving a 9/11 memorial service in New York City, makes that fact more relevant to some and a bit awkward.