IN: Tracy and James, Elaine and Phil thought it would be nice to include this summary page in the plan review package for Stan's review next week. I think Rod mentioned that Stan has set a target for Phil of 5.0MM for 2002. Please advise if this is still valid because Phil personally has not heard that from Stan. The numbers that we have in Adaytum match the $4.4 MM net contribution. The remaining $0.6MM are salary offsets on NNG. 42P does not have employees and they use NNG employees. When they do that, NNg charges the salaries of the employees for the applicable # of hours to 42P. Therefore, 42P covers expenses that NNG would have to bear otherwise. Phil feels that the $0.6MM of salaries offsets should be counted toward the 5.0 target since it's a benefit that 42P brings to NNG. James and I talked about this on the phone. Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns. Thanks!

Generate a subject line.

OUT: ETS Operations companies (1202, 42P, and 184)
IN: This is an email
This note is to confirm that Gary Hickerson has requested your attendance at the EGM Organizational Post Petition meeting on Wednesday, February 20 from 9:00 a.m. to 9:30 am in ECN 30C1. Following the meeting the EGM Asset Disposition meeting will take place from 9:30 a.m. to 10:30 a.m. in ECN 30C1. Please plan to attend or use the dial-in number shown below:

What is the subject?

OUT: REMINDER --EGM Org Post Petition Meeting
QUESTION: Aquila wants to trade online under two names, Aquila Risk Management and Aquila Energy Marketing. They have asked us to attach to their ETA, a listing, and copies, of all master agreements we have in place with those two counterparties, whether physical, financial, gas, power, etc. Can you look those up for us and copy the relevant contracts? Thanks for your help!
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: EOL-Aquila
This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification. THIS IS A WARNING MESSAGE ONLY. YOU DO NOT NEED TO RESEND YOUR MESSAGE. Delivery to the following recipients has been delayed. tom.bruce-jones@enron.com jeff.kabel@enron.com joern.schmidt@enron.com jonathan.schube@enron.com
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: Delivery Status Notification (Delay)
Hi Mike, Since we haven't had any luck hooking up on the telephone, I wanted to transmit to you an initial draft of a facility agreement, as contemplated by the contract for the transformer packages for the LM's. I would have sent this to Dave, but I don't seem to have his email address. Since the WestLB financing facility is scheduled to expire soon, we need to get the transformers transferred into our new facility, as well as get them contractually allocated to various projects. Please give me a call or have Dave call me so that we can handle this as expeditiously as possible. Thanks,
Answer: Transformers for LM's
Q: Attached is the preliminary January California monthly report for your review...our last one, yeah!!! TK - Please review/verify the rates that I have highlighted in pink. I have already spoken with Terry regarding 3 days where I noticed discrepancies between total scheduled in TMS vs website posting and have determined the correct number to report. All other data looks very similar to previous reports filed. Please provide any comments or updates that may be necessary by COB February 22nd. Thanks,
Propose a subject line
A:
Transwestern FERC California Monthly Report - January 2002 (Preliminary)