In this task, you are given text for US Congressional and California state bills, your task is to generate a summary for this bill.

Q: SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ''Digital Trade Act of 2013''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS; SENSE OF CONGRESS.

(a) Findings.--Congress makes the following findings:
(1) The Internet has become an unprecedented medium for
competition, trade, free expression, and access to information.
(2) The Internet is a driver of the global economy and must
remain open, stable, and secure.
(3) Trade in Internet-enabled services and transfers of
data and other digital information have become increasingly
critical drivers of the economic growth of the United States.
The United States International Trade Commission found in a
July 2013 report, entitled ''Digital Trade in the U.S. and
Global Economies, Part 1'', that ''U.S. exports of digitally
enabled services (one measure of international digital trade)
grew from $282.1 billion in 2007 to $356.1 billion in 2011,
with exports exceeding imports every year''.
(4) The United States is the global leader in Internet-
enabled platforms, networks, and services. Certain liability
protections for those entities under the law of the United
States, which promote innovation and creativity and allow for
cooperative efforts to address harmful activity, have been
critical to the growth of the Internet economy in the United
States.
(5) According to McKinsey & Company, more than /4\ of the
value added by the Internet is in traditional industries.
(6) Internet-enabled commerce and digital trade benefits
small- and medium-size enterprises by providing unparalleled
access to global markets.
(7) Proposals have been put forward by some trading
partners of the United States to restrict the flow of lawful
information across borders. Those proposals would cause
increased government control over the Internet and could create
a fragmented Internet.
(8) Localization barriers to trade are frequently used to
protect, favor, or stimulate domestic industries at the expense
of industries in other countries. Those localization
requirements harm the competitiveness of and end-users in the
United States.
(9) Restrictive policies regarding the flow of information
across borders are nontariff barriers that are harmful to
innovation and economic advancement. Those policies impede
trade in digital products and services and constrain the
ability of United States companies from many sectors to
effectively operate across borders.
(10) Cross-border data flows are critical to manufacturers,
institutions of higher education, hospitals, retailers,
financial services firms, laboratories, and many other
organizations that use the Internet to improve their
productivity and manage global networks of customers,
suppliers, researchers, and employees.
(11) The free flow of information across borders provides
choices and reduces costs to consumers worldwide.
(12) The position of the United States Government has been
and is to advocate for the free flow of information across
borders.
(b) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that--
(1) agencies in the executive branch, including the Office
of the United States Trade Representative, should be staffed
with experts and leaders to fulfill the mission of promoting an
open, global Internet that facilitates commerce and digital
trade; and
(2) private sector stakeholders should have the opportunity
to formally inform efforts of agencies in the executive branch
related to digital trade.

SEC. 3. NEGOTIATING PRINCIPLES FOR INTERNET-ENABLED COMMERCE AND
DIGITAL TRADE.

It shall be a negotiating principle of the United States in
negotiations for a bilateral, plurilateral, or multilateral agreement,
and in multi-stakeholder fora, to seek the inclusion of binding and
enforceable provisions that promote and enhance Internet-enabled
commerce and digital trade, including provisions--
(1) preventing or eliminating barriers to the movement of
electronic information across borders, including by encouraging
interoperability of data protection regimes and eliminating
barriers to accessing, processing, transferring, or storing
information;
(2) ensuring transparency in measures affecting the free
flow of information within and across borders;
(3) continuing the current practice of not imposing customs
duties on electronic transmissions;
(4) prohibiting measures that condition market access or
other commercial benefits on localization of data,
infrastructure, or investment;
(5) prohibiting any country from imposing measures that
require an entity to use computing infrastructure or services
in that country or otherwise require an entity to access,
process, transfer, or store data in the territory of that
country;
(6) ensuring that the Internet continues to operate within
the successful multi-stakeholder governance model;
(7) ensuring that provisions affecting intermediary
liability for Internet-enabled platforms, networks, and
services are consistent with the law of the United States;
(8) ensuring digital trade policies contemplate various
business activities across all industrial sectors and allow for
future technological advancement; and
(9) otherwise eliminating discriminatory treatment of
Internet-enabled commerce and digital trade.

A: Digital Trade Act of 2013 - Expresses the sense of Congress that: (1) executive branch agencies, including the Office of the United States Trade Representative, should be staffed with experts and leaders to promote an open, global Internet that facilitates commerce and digital trade; and (2) private sector stakeholders should have the opportunity to inform executive agency efforts related to digital trade. States that it shall be a U.S. negotiating principle in negotiations for a bilateral, plurilateral, or multilateral agreement, and in multi-stakeholder fora, to seek the inclusion of binding provisions that promote and enhance Internet-enabled commerce and digital trade.
****
Q: SECTION 1. CLASS SIZE DEMONSTRATION GRANTS.

Subpart 3 of part D of title V of the Higher Education Act of 1965
(20 U.S.C. 1109 et seq.) is amended to read as follows:

''Subpart 3--Class Size Demonstration Grants

''SEC. 561. PURPOSE.

''It is the purpose of this subpart to provide grants to State
educational agencies to enable such agencies to determine the benefits,
in various school settings, of reducing class size on the educational
performance of students and on classroom management and organization.

''SEC. 562. PROGRAM AUTHORIZED.

''(a) Program Authorized.--
''(1) In general.--The Secretary shall award grants, on a
competitive basis, to State educational agencies to pay the
Federal share of the costs of conducting demonstration projects
that demonstrate methods of reducing class size that may
provide information meaningful to other State educational
agencies and local educational agencies.
''(2) Federal share.--The Federal share shall be 50
percent.
''(b) Reservation.--The Secretary may reserve not more than 5
percent of the amount appropriated under section 565A for each fiscal
year to carry out the activities described in section 565.
''(c) Selection Criteria.--The Secretary shall make grants to State
educational agencies on the basis of--
''(1) the need and the ability of a State educational
agency to reduce the class size of an elementary school or
secondary school served by such agency;
''(2) the ability of a State educational agency to furnish
the non-Federal share of the costs of the demonstration project
for which assistance is sought;
''(3) the ability of a State educational agency to continue
the project for which assistance is sought after the
termination of Federal financial assistance under this subpart;
and
''(4) the degree to which a State educational agency
demonstrates in the application submitted pursuant to section
564 consultation in program implementation and design with
parents, teachers, school administrators, and local teacher
organizations, where applicable.
''(d) Priority.--In awarding grants under this subpart, the
Secretary shall give priority to demonstration projects that involve
at-risk students in the earliest grades, including educationally or
economically disadvantaged students, students with disabilities, and
limited English proficient students.
''(e) Grants Must Supplement Other Funds.--A State educational
agency shall use the Federal funds received under this subpart to
supplement and not supplant other Federal, State, and local funds
available to the State educational agency to carry out the purpose of
this subpart.

''SEC. 563. PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS.

''(a) Annual Competition.--In each fiscal year, the Secretary shall
announce the factors to be examined in a demonstration project assisted
under this subpart. Such factors may include--
''(1) the magnitude of the reduction in class size to be
achieved;
''(2) the level of education in which the demonstration
projects shall occur;
''(3) the form of the instructional strategy to be
demonstrated; and
''(4) the duration of the project.
''(b) Random Techniques and Appropriate Comparison Groups.--
Demonstration projects assisted under this subpart shall be designed to
utilize randomized techniques or appropriate comparison groups.

''SEC. 564. APPLICATION.

''(a) In General.--In order to receive a grant under this subpart,
a State educational agency shall submit an application to the Secretary
that is responsive to the announcement described in section 563(a), at
such time, in such manner, and containing or accompanied by such
information as the Secretary may reasonably require.
''(b) Duration.--The Secretary shall encourage State educational
agencies to submit applications under this subpart for a period of 5
years.
''(c) Contents.--Each application submitted under subsection (a)
shall include--
''(1) a description of the objectives to be attained with
the grant funds and the manner in which the grant funds will be
used to reduce class size;
''(2) a description of the steps to be taken to achieve
target class sizes, including, where applicable, the
acquisition of additional teaching personnel and classroom
space;
''(3) a statement of the methods for the collection of data
necessary for the evaluation of the impact of class size
reduction programs on student achievement;
''(4) an assurance that the State educational agency will
pay, from non-Federal sources, the non-Federal share of the
costs of the demonstration project for which assistance is
sought; and
''(5) such additional assurances as the Secretary may
reasonably require.
''(d) Sufficient Size and Scope Required.--The Secretary shall
award grants under this subpart only to State educational agencies
submitting applications which described projects of sufficient size and
scope to contribute to carrying out the purpose of this subpart.

''SEC. 565. EVALUATION AND DISSEMINATION.

''(a) National Evaluation.--The Secretary shall conduct a national
evaluation of the demonstration projects assisted under this subpart to
determine the costs incurred in achieving the reduction in class size
and the effects of the reductions on results, such as student
performance in the affected subjects or grades, attendance, discipline,
classroom organization, management, and teacher satisfaction and
retention.
''(b) Cooperation.--Each State educational agency receiving a grant
under this subpart shall cooperate in the national evaluation described
in subsection (a) and shall provide such information to the Secretary
as the Secretary may reasonably require.
''(c) Reports.--The Secretary shall report to Congress on the
results of the evaluation conducted under subsection (a).
''(d) Dissemination.--The Secretary shall widely disseminate
information about the results of the class size demonstration projects
assisted under this subpart.

''SEC. 565A. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

''There are authorized to be appropriated to carry out this subpart
$15,000,000 for fiscal year 1999 and each of the 4 succeeding fiscal
years.''.

SEC. 2. PRIVATE SECTOR FUNDING FOR RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT BY NASA
RELATING TO AIRCRAFT PERFORMANCE.

The Administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space
Administration may not carry out research and development activities
relating to the performance of aircraft (including supersonic aircraft
and subsonic aircraft) unless the Administrator receives payment in
full for such activities from the private sector.

A: Amends the Higher Education Act of 1965 to establish a competitive Class Size Demonstration Grants program.
Directs the Secretary of Education to award such grants to State educational agencies (SEAs) to pay half of the costs of conducting projects that demonstrate methods of reducing class size that may provide information meaningful to other SEAs and local educational agencies (LEAs). Authorizes the Secretary to reserve up to five percent of funds for this Act for each fiscal year to carry out national evaluation and dissemination activities.
Sets forth program requirements for: (1) grant selection criteria; (2) priority for projects that involve at-risk students in the earliest grades, including educationally or economically disadvantaged students, students with disabilities, and limited English proficient students; (3) annual competitions; (4) random techniques and appropriate comparison groups; (5) applications; and (6) sufficient size and scope of projects.
Directs the Secretary to: (1) conduct, and report to the Congress on, a national evaluation of such projects to determine the costs incurred in achieving the reduction in class size and the effects of the reductions on results; and (2) widely disseminate information about the results of such projects.
Authorizes appropriations.
(Sec. 2) Prohibits the Administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration from carrying out research and development activities relating to the performance of aircraft (including supersonic aircraft and subsonic aircraft) unless the Administrator receives payment in full for such activities from the private sector.
****
Q: SECTION 1. CREDIT EQUIVALENT TO LIMITED MARITAL DEDUCTION IN CASE OF
CERTAIN EMPLOYEES OF INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS.

(a) In General.--Subchapter C of chapter 11 of the Internal Revenue
Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end the following new section:

''SEC. 2210. CREDIT EQUIVALENT TO LIMITED MARITAL DEDUCTION IN CASE OF
CERTAIN EMPLOYEES OF INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS.

''(a) General Rule.--In the case of a decedent to whom this section
applies, the tax determined under section 2001(b) or 2101(b) (whichever
is applicable) shall be reduced by the applicable marital transfer
credit determined under subsection (c).
''(b) Decedents to Whom Section Applies.--This section shall apply
to a decedent if--
''(1) as of the date of the decedent's death--
''(A) both the decedent and the surviving spouse of
the decedent were not citizens of the United States and
not lawful permanent residents of the United States,
and
''(B) either the decedent or the surviving spouse
of the decedent was a qualified international
organization employee, and
''(2) the executor of the decedent's estate waives the
benefits of section 2056(d)(2).
''(c) Applicable Marital Transfer Credit.--
''(1) Estates taxable under section 2001.--
''(A) In general.--If the estate of the decedent is
taxable under section 2001, the applicable marital
transfer credit is the excess of--
''(i) a tentative tax computed under
section 2001(c) on the sum of the marital
transfer amount plus $600,000, over
''(ii) a tentative tax computed under
section 2001(c) on $600,000.
If the amount of the adjusted taxable gifts of the
decedent exceeds $600,000, the amount of such gifts
shall be substituted for '$600,000' in clauses (i) and
(ii).
''(B) Limitation on marital transfer amount.--The
amount of the marital transfer amount taken into
account under subparagraph (A) shall not exceed the
lesser of--
''(i) $600,000, or
''(ii) the excess of the sum referred to in
section 2001(b)(1) over $600,000.
''(2) Estates taxable under section 2101.--If the estate of
the decedent is taxable under section 2101, the applicable
marital transfer credit shall be determined under the
principles of paragraph (1) with the following modifications--
''(A) the $600,000 amount set forth in subparagraph
(B)(i) shall be reduced by the deduction equivalent of
the unified credit, and
''(B) the deduction equivalent of the unified
credit shall be substituted for '$600,000' each place
it appears in paragraph (1) other than subparagraph
(B)(i).
''(d) Spouse Becomes Citizen.--This section shall not apply in any
case in which paragraph (1) of section 2056(d) does not apply by reason
of paragraph (4) of such section.
''(e) Other Definitions.--For purposes of this section--
''(1) Qualified international organization employee.--The
term 'qualified international organization employee' means any
full-time employee of an international organization whose
principal place of employment with such organization is in the
United States.
''(2) Marital transfer amount.--The term 'marital transfer
amount' means the amount which would have been allowable as a
deduction under section 2056 or 2106(a)(3) (whichever is
applicable) if section 2056 were applied without regard to
subsection (d) thereof.
''(3) Adjusted taxable gifts.--The term 'adjusted taxable
gifts' has the same meaning as when used in section 2001 or
2101, whichever is applicable.
''(4) Deduction equivalent of unified credit.--The term
'deduction equivalent of unified credit' means, with respect to
any estate taxable under section 2101, the amount on which the
tentative tax determined under section 2001(c) would equal the
unified credit allowed under section 2102(c).''
(b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections for subchapter C of
chapter 11 of such Code is amended by adding at the end the following
new item:

''Sec. 2210. Credit equivalent to limited
marital deduction in case of
certain employees of
international organizations.''
(c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall
apply to the estates of decedents dying after the date of the enactment
of this Act.

A:
Amends the Internal Revenue Code to apply, with limitations, an estate tax credit equivalent to the limited marital deduction to a decedent in a case in which, as of the date of the decedent's death: (1) both the decedent and the surviving spouse were noncitizens of, and not lawful permanent residents of, the United States; and (2) either the decedent or his or her surviving spouse was a qualified international organization employee. Defines a qualified international organization employee as a full-time employee of an international organization whose principal place of employment with such organization is in the United States.
****