Teacher:In this task, you will be shown a prompt from a judicial decision and multiple holding statements derived from citations following text in a legal decision. Holdings represent the governing legal rule when the law is applied to a particular set of facts. There are five answer choices for each citing text. The correct answer is the holding statement that corresponds to the citing text. You should write an incorrect option. Even though there exist multiple wrong answers, we only need a single wrong answer. There is a <HOLDING> token in the position of the citing text prompt where the holding statement was extracted.
Teacher: Now, understand the problem? Solve this instance: CURIAM. Affirmed. 120.68(7)(b), Fla. Stat. (2005); Ferguson v. Miami-Dade County, 890 So.2d 450, (Fla. 3d DCA 2004)
Holding statements: (A) holding that as long as the findings are supported by substantial evidence the board must defer to the hearing committees credibility determinations because they are subsidiary findings of basic facts (B) holding that findings of fact are conclusive if supported by clear and convincing competent evidence even where the evidence might support contrary findings (C) holding that it is the commissioners findings of fact to the extent they modify or replace the administrative law judges findings that are relevant on appeal (D) holding law court will not overturn conclusions supported by competent and substantial evidence (E) holding that the court may not overturn the administrative law judges factual findings as long as they are supported by competent substantial evidence
Student:
holding that as long as the findings are supported by substantial evidence the board must defer to the hearing committees credibility determinations because they are subsidiary findings of basic facts