Problem: Here is a premise:
A bargain!

Here is a hypothesis:
It is a bargain.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Sentence 1: Is Mr. Plotz accurately reporting History's opinions?

Sentence 2: History can have an opinion that can be misrepresented.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: yes

Question:
The justices are floating a $42 increase to shore up financing for pro-bono work, as the normal funding mechanism for legal services has fallen short in recent years.

Does it follow that "The justices think we should fund pro-bono work."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
yes

Q: If Therefore we use postal density as the driver of fixed costs., can we say that "Fixed costs are pegged to postal density."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A: yes

Premise:
"I must've...I don't know what I must've done."
Hypothesis: I'm not sure what I did.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

yes

Sentence 1: Living standards dropped dramatically, and the Soviet Union was forced to prop up the Polish economy.

Sentence 2: The Soviets did not know how to prop up the Polish economy.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer:
it is not possible to tell