Categorize the comment on the basis of severe toxicity. If the comment is severely toxic output Yes, otherwise output No.

the color of the sala flowers reveals the truth that the prosperous must decline
No

The City notoriously and consistently ignores any reports (for example deferred maintenance reports from water and sewer) and recommendations that our elected Auditor makes. Even though elected, the City Auditor here in highly corrupt Portland has no teeth to speak of. I hope Ted Wheeler is going to change this and give the same or more power and respect to the City Auditor as he said he experienced with the County Auditor. He spoke about this at the Brooklyn neighborhood assn. meeting last month. So glad to see total fail Hales exit. Could the Auditor put this lobbying rule on the ballot? Or before a court?
No

Guestsquared: It's really too bad you can't manage to discuss an issue without inserting one or more personal insults. Again, may I suggest disagreeing with you on this issue or any other does make a person, ipso facto, "ill-informed." I could reply with a like comment and we could waste time and energy exchanging insults. I'm not interested in doing that.

We know, although you and the others who support this law will never acknowledge it, that it was specifically written to "discourage" panhandling by punishing anyone who donats to panhandlers from a car. This ban, of course, eliminates the primary source of contributions to panhandlers. It's designed to give Springfield panhandlers the "bum's rush", while hopefully passing the test of its Constitutionality. It may be supported by the Courts, it may not be. As I've repeatedly said, that is the Courts' responsibility. We'll likely get to see how it "plays out."
No