[QUESTION] Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "Two men in orange vests moving a heavy object sown some stairs."
Hypothesis: "Two men moving an object."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
Saying that the men are moving an object implies it has weight.
The answer is yes.

Q: Premise: "Construction workers having a discussion by the tracks."
Hypothesis: "A discussion is underway about tracks."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
A: The discussion by the tracks infers it is about the tracks.
The answer is yes.

QUESTION: Given the sentence "Three teenage boys are running towards an older man in a white shirt." can we conclude that "The older man is in a red shirt."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Let's solve it slowly: A shirt cannot be both a white shirt and a red shirt.
The answer is no.

[QUESTION] Can we conclude from "Men in orange and yellow clothing lean over a stone block." that "There are men working."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
Lean over a stone block does not mean they are working.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

Q: Given the sentence "A dog is jumping to play in the water." can we conclude that "The dog is wet or about to be wet in this picture."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A: Wet is an action which happens when we play in the water.
The answer is yes.

[QUESTION] Can we conclude from "Skier on a snowy hill has his boots check by a red-vested man." that "Skier races down the hill on his skis."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
The boots of the skier are checked by a red-vested man while he races down the hill are both different things.
The answer is no.