Detailed Instructions: Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
See one example below:
Problem: This is what I read when it comes from an EWEB commish, 'Shut up and take it!'
Solution: Yes
Explanation: The comment has term 'commish' which is an insult, also the phrase 'shut up and take it' is insulting as well. The comment is classified to be insulting. Hence, it is a positive example

Problem: So, Walker decides not to reappoint Board of game member Mumford, then after failing to get Roland Maw on the fish board appoints Mumford to the fish board, who shortly there after decides he wants off the fish board, he then replaces Mumford from the game board with a man who does not get confirmed. Leaving the board short of its seven members. Fish and Game board politics are very damaging. Walker has found it out ever since he appointed his pal Maw to the fish board who now faces multiple felony counts. His subsequent fish and game board choices have cost him much political capital with the legislature and will IMO cost him dearly if he chooses to run for a second term.
Solution:
No