In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence can be inferred from the statement. Incorrect choices change the meaning in important ways or have details that are not mentioned in the statement. Indicate your answer as 1,2, or 3 corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

Example Input: Statement: According to the Rochester team, the findings suggest that our language-learning abilities may have to do with our general cognitive prowess, not with any particular language module. Choices: 1. There's a language module that aids us in our ability to learn a new language. 2. The team at Rochester doesn't have any ideas concerning the basis of learning new languages. 3. A person's general intelligence may be related to the ability to learn a new language according to the team from Rochester.
Example Output: 3

Example Input: Statement: In 1929, disillusioned by the revolution, Mayakovsky wrote a protest play about the growing repressiveness of the regime. Choices: 1. Mayakovsky was not a write of plays. 2. Mayakovsky wrote a play to convince people to fight the regime. 3. Mayakovsky wrote a play about the regime's repressive acts.
Example Output: 3

Example Input: Statement: She assured me everything was perfectly sterile, but it didn't look clean. Choices: 1. She told me that everything was sterile even though it didn't look like it. 2. She told me that the sewing needles were sterile. 3. She told me that none of it was sterile and it would for sure kill me.
Example Output:
1