Problem: Here is a premise:
so there's where the money goes

Here is a hypothesis:
That isn't where the money goes.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Sentence 1: Analysts called it another blow to Reno's credibility and another reason to appoint an independent counsel.

Sentence 2: Reno has a conducted an independent study into its credibility and found no change, dismissing criticism from the investigative counsel of analysts responsible for the inquiries.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: no

Question:
Thorn and Vrenna, take the west.

Does it follow that "Thorn and Vrenna should take the east."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
no

Q: If good talking to you Michelle, can we say that "It was not a pleasant experience."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A: no

Premise:
"How does this relate to Canada and, specifically, the initiative you propose to launch to address issues that trouble your legal services system?"
Hypothesis: How does this relate to Canada and your initiative that was denied?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

it is not possible to tell

Sentence 1: The method was based on applying onto the wound a synthetically generated alpine calf's fat tissue and covering the scar with multi-polymeric plasma, which facilitated the healing so rapidly it was noticeable to a naked eye.

Sentence 2: The method was for treating the calf's wound sustained in the farm yard.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer:
it is not possible to tell