IN: This is an email
Hi all! Attached is a breif outline on the NJ Basic Generation Service Standard Offer. - Please read. Although this will have risks regarding capacity, ancillary services, and basis; This may be an excellent means to test the PJM standard offer market, since the minimum size required would be a 100MW slice. The NJ Board of Public Utiltiy is currently shaping the auction process, and our regulatory people have been involved by interventions. Jeff Ader (EES) has been working with regulatory to push that this should be a retail deal (similar to the retail customers that New Power won from PECO) and not a wholesale deal. Is this the message we want to send? I suggested to regulatory that we propose that it should be split as to allow the best pricing for the NJ utilities and for everyone to be able to participate. They suggested that if EES has more interest than EWS (apparently they wish to take 1000MW of this), that we should push the retail. How would retail take the ancillary and capacity risk? Are we set up such that EES would have a better chance of winning this? What is our interest in taking on these exposures? Can we meet later today, or tomorrow (Friday) to determine at least, how we want regulatory to proceed with the BPU. Nick, Palmer and I had a conference call with regulatory yesterday, and want to get back to them as they will be filing with the BPU very shortly.

What is the subject?

OUT: NJ Standard Offer
QUESTION: Mark, Please review the attached letter and provide the missing date. If everything looks good, I will prepare an original for your signature. Also, do you have any resolution on the TW transport issue? Is it acceptable for ECT to take title at the West Texas Pool and ECS still operate the transport agreement as its agent?
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: TW Force Majeure
All, We are currently working on the data model for the Trading Agreements System and have a question pertaining to internal/external counterparties. Are all agreements between an internal company(counterparty) and an external company(counterparty)? I spoke with Meredith Stewart (the data architect for this project) and she found an agreement between 2 internal counterparties, e.g. Enron Louisiana and ECT. Please let me know ASAP. Thanks,
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: Counterparties
Gentlemen: Here are the revised documents in both clean and marked form. I made the requested change in the Term section. That section defines a Early Termination as any termination prior to the end of 3 contract years. As such no change was needed to the Buyer's Contract section. Please call if you need anything further. Thanks, Dan
Answer: PSEG
Here is an email: Hi, Tanya: I received another call from Dana Dellacona at Hess asking about online and offline trading. I'll direct her once again to Tana for online trading. I'll ask her again to describe the products they want to trade. Will you evaluate?
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: Hess Energy Trading Company, LLC ("Hess") and affiliates
QUESTION: Attached is a file listing all of the curves we had that posted as 0 price for 3/31/01. We need these pub posted as the same price as the 30th - prices are included in this file. We need these pub posted ASAP so that we can flash march detail. Risk does not have authorization to override an existing pub posting, this is why we need your help. If you have any questions, please give me a shout. Thanks for your help. PL 3-7376
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS:
GD curves that pubposted as 0 for 3/31/01