We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control) into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[Q]: Sent1: If the CDC states that the ban was ineffective, then it should be a given that bans do NOT work.
Sent2: If the D.C. gun ban was ineffective because illegal guns were leaking into D.C. from other states that would be an argument for having more gun control in other states.
[A]: Not similar

[Q]: Sent1: As said,I think the people of the USA are quite capable of deciding about their own gun laws without a Brit getting involved but to make guns freely available to British citizens would be a bad, bad idea.
Sent2: I also say that when people commit a crime with a gun these people need to be punished not the law-abiding citizens!
[A]: Not similar

[Q]: Sent1: We measured firearm protection as an attempted or completed crime in which the victim reported using a gun to attack or threaten an offender.
Sent2: Right now all the police can do is try and match bullets against other bullets in an attempt to determine which gun was used.
[A]:
Not similar