Dear All, The business units are operating on a lean G&A budget and cut costs whenever we can and making sure that we are efficient. Are there any initiative to do likewise for all corp functions? As an accountant in the business unit, we received corp allocations. The total for corp was more than $700MM. This, of course, excludes Enron Net Work, Enron Property, and Global Finance, which if we include those, the G&A to Enron could well be over $1Billion (not counting the business units G&A). The number just blew me away. I think we need to make sure all functions are needed and are run efficiently. We cannot say it's OK just because we can allocate to the business units because the business units may not receive benefits for these costs. We sure don't want Enron, as a whole, to be growing so fat and so fast that it will hurt our bottom line. I'm sorry if I'm out of line, but I really do care about Enron and am very proud to be its employee. Thank you for your time.
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: cost cutting measures - from an Employee/shareholder point of view
Dear Jeffrey, Izio Support has just added you to their course, E278-1. If you feel that this is an error, please email them at: iziosupport@convene.com If you have any questions or comments regarding this email or the Iziosystem, please forward them to: IzioSupport@convene.com. Sincerely,
Answer: Account Information for E278-1
Here is an email: Enron Kids No donation is too small! Please contact Stephanie Truss, 5-3861, or Martha Keesler, 5-2423, to make a cash donation. The deadline for making your cash donation is Thursday, December 6, 2001. EWS Legal Gordon Elementary School Adoption
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: Adopt a Kid - Reminder
Q: Jim-I just wanted you to know that you are in my mind during these difficult times. I know how disappointing this all must be to you, but know that you have a lot of friends supporting you. Regards
Propose a subject line
A: Thoughts
IN: Microsoft's in-house counsel called me on my cell phone a few minutes ago. He just wanted to let me know that they received our proposal this morning and that they have retained Preston Gates & Ellis LLP to assist them in reviewing and analyzing our proposal. He said they would be getting back with us shortly -- hopefully tomorrow -- and said that his business folks where intent on moving "forward instead of backward," whatever that means.

Generate a subject line.

OUT: Microsoft
IN: This is an email
Per our discussion this morning, below is a summary of items to discuss with Glynn: Adding Enron's "negative CTC claim" to the list of claims: PGE's filing included a list of top twenty creditors. Our negative CTC claim was apparently not taken into account in compiling that list. The list is nonbinding, however. PG&E will be required to file schedules of creditors on April 20. Our negative CTC claim should be on Schedule F (for unsecured claims). You may want to remind Glynn of your previous conversations and state our expectation that the negative CTC claim will appear (preferably as uncontested) in the April 20 filing. (Note: if PG&E does not include the claim we have an opportunity to file a proof of claim and ultimately the court determines the validity of the claim). Including Enron on the Creditors' Committee: PG&E may have the opportunity to influence representation on the creditors' committees. There are several reasons to suggest to Glynn that we be included: 1) we are a big creditor, 2) we could be helpful in crafting a broader solution, and 3) we are one of the real parties in interest behind the PX and ISO (who were listed as significant creditors but are really just "passthroughs" for the suppliers ... and PG&E likely would not want to have those political bodies serving on the creditors committee anyway).

What is the subject?

OUT:
Call to Bob Glynn