In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.

[EX Q]: Comment: No, members of the public who do not make nicey-face are now officially silenced. Kidd no longer has to listen to them, she can just have them removed.

Since the point of these rules seems to be to protect Cherie Kidd from anything she finds unpleasant, I would guess that her ability to trash Council meetings, or do any other lunacy that occurs to her, will actually be more protected than it already was.
[EX A]: Non-threat

[EX Q]: Comment: You are murdering feckless SCUM. Your mother would slap you for being the piece of shit that you are. I hope you die in enormous pain from cancer in your asshole that makes you cry from the pain every time you shit you fucking subhuman scum......Fuck you. I would gladly cut your fucking balls off in a minute....go suck cock you piece of shit! Fuck you and your mother you sorry fuckin swill!
[EX A]: Threat

[EX Q]: Comment: Better than the liberal " better red than dead " policy where the end result will be the same. Only force will work with this insane leader. Of course after Anchorage , Honolulu or some other American city is nuked by North Korea , then you'll scream about how we didn't do anything. You have to shot a rabid dog before he bites others. offering him steak won't keep him from killing you. It's time to end the talk . Better to take out that country before they get a hundred nukes . Doing nothing , and sanctions are nothing to N. Korea, isn't an option. Once N. Korea in taken out the problem is solved. What's your solution---send him Girl Scout cookies and ask him to please not hurt us ?
[EX A]:
Threat