In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: Ironically, Walker's cuts will help deter smart people from moving up to help solve our problems. We're already in a race for the bottom when it comes to talent. I thought Walker was smarter than this.

Output: Non-obscene

Input: Consider Input: Comment: Hirono and Schatz would be disappointed with Christ if he ran as a Republican. The Democrats are in serious trouble. They've gone so far out to the extreme, they've completely lost their way. Obstruction is the only thing they think they can do. Voters will not reward them for their obstruction. Folks elected Trump because they were tired of this continued schoolyard bickering in Washington. Under Obama the divisiveness grew to new high levels. Americans are tired of this crap.

Output: Obscene

Input: Consider Input: Comment: This is the kind of gimmicky, meaningless crap that gets made when ad people and bureaucrats are hired to create "culture."

Toronto is filled with incredibly knowledgeable and talented writers and artists who could have created something memorable and meaningful and that wasn't a cheap mimicking of a beer commercial.

This is utterly embarrassing. I hope kids don't notice it.
Output: Obscene