We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control) into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Example Input: Sent1: So you have to read the 2nd amendment as a whole.
Sent2: If you repealed the 2nd amendment or any "incorporated" amendment than that amendment would no longer be law thus not "incorporated" (obviously since there is nothing to incorporate).
Example Output: Not similar

Example Input: Sent1: I think the 2nd Amendment does apply to modern guns.
Sent2: Now when you rightfully talk about how the 2nd amendment grants me the right to own a gun people won't take you seriously because you think the 2nd amendment cannot be repealed.
Example Output: Not similar

Example Input: Sent1: Gun control laws do not deprive gun ownership for those who do not follow laws.
Sent2: No law shall impose licensure, registration or special taxation on the ownership or possession of firearms or ammunition.
Example Output:
Not similar