Given a paragraph about movies and a set of conversational questions and answers about the paragraph, say whether the passage contains sufficient information to answer the follow-up question. Say Yes if it is answerable; otherwise, say No. The paragraph has the prefix 'CONTEXT:'. Each conversation question has a prefix 'Q:' followed by the answer prefix 'A:', and the follow-up question has a prefix 'FOLLOWUP_Q:'.

[Q]: CONTEXT: Dev Patel plays the adult Saroo, so he is only in the movie for the last third or so. He's the main character but he's part of the resolution of the plot. It's a judgment call by the Academy, but his screen time is far less than that of the Best Actor nominees this year, so to call his a supporting role seems correct. <sep> Q: Why was Dev Patel nominated for Supporting Actor rather than Best Actor? A: Dev Patel plays the adult Saroo, so he is only in the movie for the last third or so <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: So he wasn't eligible?
[A]: Yes

[Q]: CONTEXT: Dawson was not called to testify as a legal maneuver. Criminal defense lawyers know when to withhold a testimony by the accused, because that would open up the prosecution's questions of his character. Dawson had the illegal fence-line shooting in his recent history where he shot at his counterpart. This was the same shooting Santiago reported, and was using to bargain his release from detail at Guantanamo. <sep> Q: Why was Dawson not called to testify? A: Dawson was not called to testify as a legal maneuver Q: He was ordered to operate Code Red. How come he wasn't called? A: Criminal defense lawyers know when to withhold a testimony by the accused, because that would open up the prosecution's questions of his character Q: What did the accused do exactly? A: Dawson had the illegal fence-line shooting in his recent history where he shot at his counterpart Q: Who reported the shooting? A: This was the same shooting Santiago reported, and was using to bargain his release from detail at Guantanamo <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Was Santiago a bystander or was he involved?
[A]: No

[Q]: CONTEXT: For the same reason that Jeff doesn't immediately call the police with his suspicions: fear that if Thorwald realizes he has been made by an outside observer, he will dispose of all the evidence and escape without prosecution... Lisa is buying more time by being taken under arrest, and the event was intended to appease Thorwald to some extent. He was already making mistakes (retaining his wife's wedding ring due to sentimentality), and Lisa was clinging onto the thought that their plan was not yet foiled. The arrest itself was actually a means of getting Lisa safely out of the apartment, and of getting the wedding ring (as evidence) into the hands of the police. <sep> Q: Why didn't Lisa tell the truth about Thorwald to the police? A: fear that if Thorwald realizes he has been made by an outside observer, he will dispose of all the evidence and escape without prosecution Q: Why did she get herself arrested? A: Lisa is buying more time by being taken under arrest <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Who actually made this movie?
[A]:
No