Q: Premise: "A man is looking at flowers in a field."
Hypothesis: "A man hiding in a sandcastle on the beach."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
A: A person who is hiding in a sandcastle cannot be looking at flowers in a field.
The answer is no.

QUESTION: Can we conclude from "There are many people spread out across an urban area." that "There are many people in an urban area."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell

Let's solve it slowly: Being in an area could include being spread out across the area.
The answer is yes.

[QUESTION] Given the sentence "A man paddling in water." can we conclude that "The man is in a rowboat."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A man paddling in water is not always in a rowboat.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

Q: Given the sentence "Black dog snaps at red and black object as brown dog lunges." is it true that "Two dogs are seen in the distance near a tree."?
A: Count of two dogs has not been specified and they are said to snap but not given the location tree.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

QUESTION: Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "A dalmation runs along the beach."
Hypothesis: "Dalmatian taking a nap on the beach."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell

Let's solve it slowly: A dalmation cannot run and take a nap at the same time.
The answer is no.

QUESTION: Can we conclude from "Usa basketball player dribbling to the basket protecting the ball from the opposition." that "Player throws ball out of bounds in anger."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell

Let's solve it slowly:
A player protecting the ball would not throw the ball out of bounds in anger.
The answer is no.