Context:
He is the professor of theater and drama at Loyola University and the director of Wilson's "Two Trains Running," now onstage at Pegasus Players.
Hypothesis: The person mentioned is not only a professor, but also a director. OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No
Yes
Input: OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No

Winning Team John C. Harsanyi, John F. Nash and Reinhard Selten were jointly awarded the Nobel Prize in Economics. The three professors were singled out for their unique contributions to game theory, derived from studies of games such as poker or chess, in which players have to think ahead and devise a strategy based on expected countermoves from opponents.

Sentence: John F. Nash has initials, they are J, F, and N.

Output: Yes
Problem:
Read the following paragraph and determine if the hypothesis is true:

How to fix mistakes made when writing checks<br>Stop writing as soon as you realize you've made an error. Take a moment to assess your error. Here are some common errors that are made when writing checks : [substeps] You write the date using last year, instead of the current one.

OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No
Hypothesis: When you make an error, taking a moment to assess it is superfluous.
****
Answer:
No
[Q]: The Table<br>The family wanted some new furniture. They wanted a table for their kitchen most of all. They found a beautiful table in a local store. They bought it and brought it home. It was a great addition to their home! The family loved their new table in their home. OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No
[A]: Yes
Problem: Pizza Party<br>Our field trip to Pizza Hut was a lot of fun. We were allowed in the kitchen, where we were shown how to make pizza. We each made our own pizzas to cook in the oven. Since we were little, we weren't allowed to use the ovens ourselves. We ate in the dining room before going back to school.

Based on the paragraph above can we conclude that "They ate in the dining room after they came back from school."? OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No

A: No
Context:
In conclusion, while we on this side of the House are supporting Bill C-67 with no resistance at this time because we believe that the bill is offering advantages to Canadians, we should take the opportunity to scold the government for its foot dragging on implementing further changes to the financial services industry that need to occur.
Hypothesis: In conclusion, while we on this side of the House are supporting Bill C-66 we should take the opportunity to scold the government for its foot dragging on implementing further changes to the financial services industry that need to occur. OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No
No