Categorize the comment on the basis of obscenity. If the comment is obscene output Yes, otherwise output No.
--------
Question: Boozer Schmidt: I suppose this would all have been much easier if the district had just brought you in to let them know who was deserving of their right to an education. You seem to have this all figured out, so I'm guessing you have some background in childhood development, education, or have studied the long-term outcomes for special education. I would definitely be interested in reading your research.

Or maybe you're just an idiot. I suppose that's possible too.

Answer: Yes

Question: So what is your solution? The permanent fund restructuring is the only realistic way to fund government. It is just math. There isn't enough income to tax to pay for a 3 billion deficit. And if you tax my income and hand it to people getting PFD's, then the PFD becomes welfare

Answer: No

Question: the RG can be an absolute embarrassment to professional journalism. We're no longer debating the issue of social parasites pawned off as "homeless," we're discussing the intellectual bankruptcy of the RG censoring debate.

Answer:
Yes