Problem: Here is a premise:
Nehring says it's mainly a codification of the 1988 Supreme Court decision, and wouldn't put much more burden on unions to prove they've got members' permission to spend money on political causes.

Here is a hypothesis:
The 1988 Supreme Court Decision was in relationship to unions.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Sentence 1: Click for a rundown of candidates and organizations that raised more than $20,000 from students.

Sentence 2: These candidates tend to be more radical than other candidates.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question:
People in the Brave New World satisfy the wants they have but are prevented from having some good wants, like want for love and family, and deprived of the opportunity to reach for new and better wants.

Does it follow that "People in the Brave New World are not permitted to love."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
yes

Q: If as long as we do it in a logical manner rather than what we did in Vietnam except jack around with it, can we say that "As long as we do not repeat what we did in Vietnam."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A: yes

Premise:
"well no not really i need to it it looks so bad you can see where those spackling marks were i need to uh either paper back over it or do something"
Hypothesis: You can see where there were spackling marks and it looks really bad.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

yes

Sentence 1: To measure this value, it is important to assess how reductions in air pollution reduce the risk of dying from the time that reductions take effect onward, and how individuals value these changes.

Sentence 2: It is important to assess how reductions in air pollution reduce the risk of dying from the time that reductions take effect onward in order to measure this value.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer:
yes