Teacher: In this task, you are given text for US Congressional and California state bills, your task is to generate a summary for this bill.
Teacher: Now, understand the problem? If you are still confused, see the following example:
SECTION 1. LIABILITY OF BUSINESS ENTITIES PROVIDING USE OF FACILITIES
TO NONPROFIT ORGANIZATIONS.

(a) Definitions.--In this section:
(1) Business entity.--The term ''business entity'' means a
firm, corporation, association, partnership, consortium, joint
venture, or other form of enterprise.
(2) Facility.--The term ''facility'' means any real
property, including any building, improvement, or appurtenance.
(3) Gross negligence.--The term ''gross negligence'' means
voluntary and conscious conduct by a person with knowledge (at
the time of the conduct) that the conduct is likely to be
harmful to the health or well-being of another person.
(4) Intentional misconduct.--The term ''intentional
misconduct'' means conduct by a person with knowledge (at the
time of the conduct) that the conduct is harmful to the health
or well-being of another person.
(5) Nonprofit organization.--The term ''nonprofit
organization'' means--
(A) any organization described in section 501(c)(3)
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and exempt from
tax under section 501(a) of such Code; or
(B) any not-for-profit organization organized and
conducted for public benefit and operated primarily for
charitable, civic, educational, religious, welfare, or
health purposes.
(6) State.--The term ''State'' means each of the several
States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto
Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, the Northern
Mariana Islands, any other territory or possession of the
United States, or any political subdivision of any such State,
territory, or possession.
(b) Limitation on Liability.--
(1) In general.--Subject to subsection (c), a business
entity shall not be subject to civil liability relating to any
injury or death occurring at a facility of the business entity
in connection with a use of such facility by a nonprofit
organization if--
(A) the use occurs outside of the scope of business
of the business entity;
(B) such injury or death occurs during a period
that such facility is used by the nonprofit
organization; and
(C) the business entity authorized the use of such
facility by the nonprofit organization.
(2) Application.--This subsection shall apply--
(A) with respect to civil liability under Federal
and State law; and
(B) regardless of whether a nonprofit organization
pays for the use of a facility.
(c) Exception for Liability.--Subsection (b) shall not apply to an
injury or death that results from an act or omission of a business
entity that constitutes gross negligence or intentional misconduct,
including any misconduct that--
(1) constitutes a crime of violence (as that term is
defined in section 16 of title 18, United States Code) or act
of international terrorism (as that term is defined in section
2331 of title 18) for which the defendant has been convicted in
any court;
(2) constitutes a hate crime (as that term is used in the
Hate Crime Statistics Act (28 U.S.C. 534 note));
(3) involves a sexual offense, as defined by applicable
State law, for which the defendant has been convicted in any
court; or
(4) involves misconduct for which the defendant has been
found to have violated a Federal or State civil rights law.
(d) Superseding Provision.--
(1) In general.--Subject to paragraph (2) and subsection
(e), this Act preempts the laws of any State to the extent that
such laws are inconsistent with this Act, except that this Act
shall not preempt any State law that provides additional
protection from liability for a business entity for an injury
or death with respect to which conditions under subparagraphs
(A) through (C) of subsection (b)(1) apply.
(2) Limitation.--Nothing in this Act shall be construed to
supersede any Federal or State health or safety law.
(e) Election of State Regarding Nonapplicability.--This Act shall
not apply to any civil action in a State court against a business
entity in which all parties are citizens of the State if such State
enacts a statute--
(1) citing the authority of this subsection;
(2) declaring the election of such State that this Act
shall not apply to such civil action in the State; and
(3) containing no other provision.
Solution: Shields a business entity from civil liability relating to any injury or death occurring at a facility of that entity in connection with a use of such facility by a nonprofit organization if: (1) the use occurs outside the scope of business of the business entity; (2) such injury or death occurs during a period that such facility is used by such organization; and (3) the business entity authorized the use of such facility by the organization.
Makes this Act inapplicable to an injury or death that results from an act or omission of a business entity that constitutes gross negligence or intentional misconduct, including misconduct that: (1) constitutes a hate crime or a crime of violence or act of international terrorism for which the defendant has been convicted in any court; or (2) involves a sexual offense for which the defendant has been convicted in any court or misconduct for which the defendant has been found to have violated a Federal or State civil rights law.
Preempts State laws to the extent that such laws are inconsistent with this Act, except State law that provides additional protection from liability. Specifies that this Act shall not be construed to supersede any Federal or State health or safety law.
Makes this Act inapplicable to any civil action in a State court against a business entity in which all parties are citizens of the State if such State, citing this Act's authority and containing no other provision, enacts a statute declaring the State's election that this Act shall not apply to such action in the State.
Reason: This Bill focuses on shielding business entities from civil liability relating to an injury or death depending on the conditions of injury, hence the generated summary is correct.

Now, solve this instance: SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ''Otay Mountain Wilderness Act of
1999''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

The Congress finds and declares the following:
(1) The public lands within the Otay Mountain region of
California are one of the last remaining pristine locations in
western San Diego County, California.
(2) This rugged mountain adjacent to the United States-Mexico
border is internationally known for its diversity of unique and
sensitive plants.
(3) This area plays a critical role in San Diego's multi-
species conservation plan, a national model made for maintaining
biodiversity.
(4) Due to its proximity to the international border, this area
is the focus of important law enforcement and border interdiction
efforts necessary to curtail illegal immigration and protect the
area's wilderness values.
(5) The illegal immigration traffic, combined with the rugged
topography, also presents unique fire management challenges for
protecting lives and resources.

SEC. 3. DESIGNATION.

In furtherance of the purposes of the Wilderness Act (16 U.S.C.
1131 et seq.), certain public lands in the California Desert District
of the Bureau of Land Management, California, comprising approximately
18,500 acres as generally depicted on a map entitled ''Otay Mountain
Wilderness'' and dated May 7, 1998, are hereby designated as wilderness
and therefore as a component of the National Wilderness Preservation
System, which shall be known as the Otay Mountain Wilderness.

SEC. 4. MAP AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION.

(a) In General.--As soon as practicable after the date of the
enactment of this Act, a map and a legal description for the Wilderness
Area shall be filed by the Secretary with the Committee on Energy and
Natural Resources of the Senate and the Committee on Resources of the
House of Representatives. Such map and legal description shall have the
same force and effect as if included in this Act, except that the
Secretary, as appropriate, may correct clerical and typographical
errors in such legal description and map. Such map and legal
description for the Wilderness Area shall be on file and available for
public inspection in the offices of the Director and California State
Director, Bureau of Land Management, Department of the Interior.
(b) United States-Mexico Border.--In carrying out this section, the
Secretary shall ensure that the southern boundary of the Wilderness
Area is 100 feet north of the trail depicted on the map referred to in
subsection (a) and is at least 100 feet from the United States-Mexico
international border.

SEC. 5. WILDERNESS REVIEW.

The Congress hereby finds and directs that all the public lands not
designated wilderness within the boundaries of the Southern Otay
Mountain Wilderness Study Area (CA-060-029) and the Western Otay
Mountain Wilderness Study Area (CA-060-028) managed by the Bureau of
Land Management and reported to the Congress in 1991, have been
adequately studied for wilderness designation pursuant to section 603
of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1782),
and are no longer subject to the requirements contained in section
603(c) of that Act pertaining to the management of wilderness study
areas in a manner that does not impair the suitability of such areas
for preservation as wilderness.

SEC. 6. ADMINISTRATION OF WILDERNESS AREA.

(a) In General.--Subject to valid existing rights and to subsection
(b), the Wilderness Area shall be administered by the Secretary in
accordance with the provisions of the Wilderness Act (16 U.S.C. 1131 et
seq.), except that--
(1) any reference in such provisions to the effective date of
the Wilderness Act is deemed to be a reference to the effective
date of this Act; and
(2) any reference in such provisions to the Secretary of
Agriculture is deemed to be a reference to the Secretary of the
Interior.
(b) Border Enforcement, Drug Interdiction, and Wildland Fire
Protection.--Because of the proximity of the Wilderness Area to the
United States-Mexico international border, drug interdiction, border
operations, and wildland fire management operations are common
management actions throughout the area encompassing the Wilderness
Area. This Act recognizes the need to continue such management actions
so long as such management actions are conducted in accordance with the
Wilderness Act (16 U.S.C. 1131 et seq.) and are subject to such
conditions as the Secretary considers appropriate.

SEC. 7. FURTHER ACQUISITIONS.

Any lands within the boundaries of the Wilderness Area that are
acquired by the United States after the date of the enactment of this
Act shall become part of the Wilderness Area and shall be managed in
accordance with all the provisions of this Act and other laws
applicable to such a wilderness.

SEC. 8. NO BUFFER ZONES.

The Congress does not intend for the designation of the Wilderness
Area by this Act to lead to the creation of protective perimeters or
buffer zones around the Wilderness Area. The fact that nonwilderness
activities or uses can be seen or heard from areas within the
Wilderness Area shall not, of itself, preclude such activities or uses
up to the boundary of the Wilderness Area.

SEC. 9. DEFINITIONS.

As used in this Act:
(1) Public lands.--The term ''public lands'' has the same
meaning as that term has in section 103(e) of the Federal Land
Policy and Management Act of 1976.
(2) Secretary.--The term ''Secretary'' means the Secretary of
the Interior.
(3) Wilderness area.--The term ''Wilderness Area'' means the
Otay Mountain Wilderness designated by section 3.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and
President of the Senate.
Student:
Otay Mountain Wilderness Act of 1998 - Designates specified public lands in the California Desert District of the Bureau of Land Management as the Otay Mountain Wilderness.
Recognizes that, because of the Wilderness Area's proximity to the U.S.-Mexican international border, drug interdiction, border operations, and wildland fire management operations need to continue so long as they are conducted in accordance with the Wilderness Act and any conditions the Secretary of the Interior considers appropriate.
Declares that such designation is not intended to lead to the creation of protective buffer zones around the Wilderness.