Question: Sentence A: For the economy as a whole, national saving is the portion of the nation's income not used for private and public consumption.

Sentence B: National income that is used for public consumption can be counted as national savings.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question: Many of those mothers were casualties of the '80s crack epidemic.
In the 80s a crack epidemic lead to casualties.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Problem: Here is a premise:
that's not good but i mean everybody's always looking at him that's just like Larry Bird and um uh God Larry Bird what team does he play for Celtics

Here is a hypothesis:
Larry Bird doesn't play anymore, I don't know why they look at him.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Sentence 1: right right it was the network

Sentence 2: The network had nothing to do with it.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: no

Question:
that uh was a real good one to do it was it was tough but uh yeah do you have any others or is it just mainly cross-stitch

Does it follow that "That was a really bad one for it, it was too easy and it just was not good at all. "?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
no

Question:
Based on the premise "Our justice system is predicated on the assumption that both parties will be represented by lawyers who act as gatekeepers and guides through a complex legal system that would otherwise be inaccessible to many of us.", can we conclude that "Our justice system assumes everyone has a good lawyer."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
yes