Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.

Example Input: This kind of thinking is why the 30 year old Saudi Prince glutted the oil market, they knew fools would bankrupt oil producers so Saudi can control the oil market they have!

Stop attacking the money men like musselman who helps keep Alaska alive, look at the last lease sales on the North Slope, if it was not for Caelus and Armstrong Alaska would be in real bad shape, the majors would have to shut down the trans Alaska pipeline.
Example Output: No

Example Input: You say:
"Funny how ADN reporters fail to highlight things like the fact that after this ordeal, a Cordova Trooper paid for the victim's 5 night hotel stay out of pocket (things like that are not unusual)..."
but in the story it is stated that a trooper paid.

See "According to Brandenburg, one of the troopers at the Cordova post covered a five-night hotel stay for him out of his own pocket."

What does what you write "...day before another ADN reporter's headline about the shooting of a violent man with knives in his hands who rushed troopers after they try to talk him down, resulting in them shooting him to save themselves from being slashed is summarized by the headline "Troopers shoot and kill man on his birthday." No bias there, right ADN?

got to do with the story about Christopher and why the heartache about the difference of the two above references?
Example Output: Yes

Example Input: _"Buh Bye Hillary"_ -- "4:20" the anonymous poster

Buh Bye "4:20"!

And, good riddance.

-- Paul
Example Output:
No