Given a paragraph, generate a claim that is supported by the given paragraph. 1) The claim must contain information from within the paragraph. 2) A sentence within the paragraph can be used as a claim. 3) The claim should not have contradictions within the paragraph. 4) The claim should be at most one sentence long.

Ex Input:
She's disappointed not to have been able to claim ultimate victory in the battle against the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) that causes the killer disease AIDS, but also proud that in three decades, the virus has been beaten into check. While a cure for AIDS may or may not be found in her lifetime, the 68-year-old says, achieving "remission" - where infected patients control HIV in their bodies and, crucially, can come off treatment for years - is definitely within reach. "I am personally convinced that remission...is achievable. When? I don't know. But it is feasible," she told Reuters at her laboratory at Paris's Pasteur Institute, where she and her mentor Luc Montagnier discovered HIV in 1983. "We have 'proof of concept'. We have...the famous Visconti patients, treated very early on. Now it is more than 10 years since they stopped their treatment and they are still doing very well, most of them." Sinoussi is referring to a study group of 14 French patients known as the Visconti cohort, who started on antiretroviral treatment within 10 weeks of being infected and stayed on it for an average of three years. A decade after stopping the drugs, the majority have levels of HIV so low they are undetectable. These and other isolated cases of remission, or so-called "functional cure", give hope to the 37 million people worldwide who, due to scientific progress, should now be able to live with, not have their lives cut short by, HIV. In developed countries at least - and in many poorer ones too - an HIV positive diagnosis is no longer an immediate death sentence, since patients can enjoy long, productive lives in decent health by taking antiretroviral drugs to control the virus. It's a long way from the early 1980s, when Sinoussi remembers sick, dying HIV-positive patients coming to the doors of the Pasteur and pleading with scientists there for answers. "They asked us: 'What we are going to do to cure us'," she says. At that time, she says, she knew relatively little about HIV, but what she was sure of was that these patients would never live long enough to see a treatment developed, let alone a cure. "It was very, very hard." Yet this interaction with real patients, and with their doctors and later their advocates, gave Sinoussi an important insight into what was needed to make her life in science one with meaning and impact collaboration. Working across barriers - be they scientific disciplines, cultural, religious and political divides, international borders or gender distinctions, has been and remains Sinoussi's driving force. In her earliest days, feeling disengaged while working on her PhD and itching for action in a real-life laboratory, she hustled her way in to working at the male-dominated Pasteur Institute for free with a virologist researching links between cancers and retroviruses in mice. While viruses are her thing, she has throughout her career worked with, cajoled and learned from immunologists, cancer specialists, experts in diseases of aging, pharmaceutical companies, AIDS patients, campaigners, and even the pope. "When you work in HIV, it's not only working in HIV, it's working far, far beyond," she said. Freshly armed with her Nobel award and fired up about a lack of support for proven methods of preventing HIV's spread, Sinoussi wrote an open letter to then-Pope Benedict XVI in 2009 criticising him for saying that condoms can promote the spread of AIDS. In what was widely seen as a modification of his stance in response to such criticism, Benedict said in a book a year later that use of condoms could sometimes be justified in certain limited cases as a way to fight AIDS. Sinoussi says: "HIV has shown the way to go in the field of science. You can't be isolated in your laboratory. You need to work with others." And this, she adds, is the "all together" spirit with which she advises her successors to continue after she's gone. Many will be sad to see her leave, but she has faith that her chosen field will deliver for the people who need it. "Of course, I would love to have stopped and to see we had a vaccine against HIV and another treatment that could induce remission but that's life. I encourage the new generation of scientists today to continue our work. "Science never stops," she says. "Just because a scientist stops, the science should not stop."

Ex Output:
Science won't stop until it beats AIDS, says HIV pioneer.

Ex Input:
The story provided no cost estimates for vitamin and mineral supplements. The magnitude of wasted expenditures that could be saved is relevant. The story indicated that there was no cancer risk reduction associated with the vitamin supplements studied. A quote in the story from the author of one of the studies indicated that too little or too much of particular vitamins was associated with increased cancer risk. In addition, the table in the story provided information about vitamins being associated with an increased risk of diabetes and a higher, though not significant increase in the incidence in the case of one cancer. The story did not convey any sense of the quality of the studies on which it was reporting. Were they retrospective observational studies (generally weak designs) or prospective randomized trials (the best type of study). A more insightful explanation about why the current group of studies which find no protective effect are more compelling that the previous studies that found a protective effect of vitamins would have also been useful.. This story did not engage in disease mongering. The story included quotes from one of the study authors, as well as a spokesperson from the American Cancer Society and an expert without connection to the study but who wrote an editorial accompanying the study. The story mentions specific lifestyle interventions which have been shown to be associated with reduction in cancer risk. It inaccurately mentioned screening for colon, cervical, and breast cancer as means of reducing their risk. It should have stated that these screening tests are associated with reduced risk of dying of these cancers, not as means of reducing the chance of developing them. It's clear that vitamins and mineral supplements are in widespread use. The story correctly indicated that the results of the current study are consistent with the results from several recent studies which demonstrated that vitamin supplementation failed to decrease the chance of developing cancer. The sidebar table, which summarized results and included the journal name and month of publication, provided a resource for interested readers to find more information. Does not appear to rely on a press release.

Ex Output:
Vitamins get 'F' in cancer prevention

Ex Input:
Through it all, Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus has endeavored to rise above the troubles with a focus on one main task: Building international "solidarity" against an outbreak whose confirmed death toll is nearly 300,000 and that quelled economic activity in countries rich and poor. Many health policy experts have praised his handling of the outbreak overall, despite criticism of the U.N. health agency by the Trump administration. Next week, Tedros' track record and background will come under intensified scrutiny as WHO holds its biggest annual event the World Health Assembly in a "virtual" and abbreviated version that focuses on COVID-19. Critics and some analysts cite his background as a government minister in Ethiopia, with its history of authoritarian regimes. Not long after taking office in 2017, Tedros appointed Zimbabwe's then president, Robert Mugabe, who often traveled abroad to receive health care, as a WHO "goodwill ambassador," only to revoke the appointment after a wave of outrage erupted. Most recently, Trump has faulted WHO for being too accepting and praising of China's handling of the early outbreak, wedging Tedros personally in the tense political standoff between the U.S. and China. He has shied away from criticizing the two powerful U.N. members, and has praised both President Donald Trump and Xi even while leaving hints seemingly directed at Beijing and Washington. "Don't use this virus as an opportunity to fight against each other or score political points. It's dangerous," he said recently, appealing to the world. "It's the political problem that may fuel further this pandemic." Tedros, 55, knows about the punishing sides to both politics and pandemics: A malaria expert with a doctorate in microbiology from the University of Nottingham in Britain, he served as health minister and foreign minister in Ethiopia before his election in 2017 in one of WHO's most competitive races. He's the first WHO chief from Africa, and the first who doesn't have a medical degree seen as a hole in his resume by some critics. Tedros was born in the city of Asmara, before it and the rest of Eritrea split from Ethiopia. Like many Ethiopians, he goes by his first name. A father of five, he has tweeted about riding bikes with his daughter. A few years ago, he tried out the saxophone, but give it up because of a heavy workload. Years ago, Tedros was spotted as a rising star of health policy by Melinda Gates, whose charitable foundation has become WHO's No. 2 donor. He has been credited for helping expand Ethiopia's health care workforce as health minister from 2005 to 2012. Tedros often uses wit, feigned ignorance and charm to disarm or sidestep critics. He has drawn on the star power of Lady Gaga and garnered support from European leaders, and called Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez "mi hermano": my brother. He bills himself "Dr. Tedros," leaning on his doctorate, and actively tweets to a million followers. No stranger to the personal anecdote, Tedros once said it was "pure luck" for him to aspire to the top WHO job, noting that when he was 7, his younger brother died from a childhood disease and it could just as easily have been him. Dr. Lia Tadesse, Ethiopia's current health minister, who worked with Tedros when he had her job, said he was known for showing calm, patience and a good ear. "While he was a minister, he was known to really care for people who are considered at the lowest level of the strata, like the cleaner, the security guard and so on," she said by phone. "He takes time to listen to their problems, and really recognize their efforts." Tedros has played down death threats against him, but has stood up to defend Africa. He has blasted the government of Taiwan, which isn't a U.N. member state, for allegedly condoning "racial slurs" against him. Taiwan's current government has faced intense political pressure from rival China, and has been appealing for admission as an observer to the World Health Assembly on Monday and Tuesday. Political sniping between the U.S. and China, and Tedros' own political baggage, can make it tough to cut through the noise during a global health emergency. "If you criticize the WHO and Tedros, you're somehow seen as a supporter of the Trump administration and their clearly self-serving attacks to shift blame from their own failure," said Jeffrey Smith, director of Washington-based Vanguard Africa, a promoter of democracy. "On the other hand, if you defend Dr. Tedros and the WHO, you're seen as somehow endorsing his comfort level with the world's despots and dictators." "Yes, Dr. Tedros is the product of a deeply authoritarian regime. And he has long displayed an affinity for dictators," Smith said. "The WHO does critical work and deserves support. And yes, the WHO also needs reform. All of these things can be true." David Shinn, a U.S. ambassador to Ethiopia in the 1990s, said Tedros had a good relationship with both Beijing and Washington while Ethiopia's foreign minister. Shinn cited a "cautionary note:" Tedros had the job when Ethiopia relied heavily on China for economic and political support, as it does today. "As a result, he probably was willing to accept at face value what he was being told by China with perhaps not questioning as strongly as he might have what the situation really was," said Shinn, an adjunct professor at George Washington University's Elliott School of International Affairs. Tedros appears to have learned one key thing from his predecessor, Dr. Margaret Chan of China: Be reactive to outbreaks. Amid the Ebola outbreak in eastern Congo that's now seemingly on its last legs, Tedros traveled over a dozen times to the region. With COVID-19, he has been omnipresent. "Dr. Tedros has been very much at the helm in terms of being in almost every single press conference, communicating directly with the public, tweeting really speaking directly to people," said Suerie Moon, co-director of the Global Health Center at Geneva's Graduate Institute. "He's able to really humanize a situation that's quite frightening for most people and be a reassuring presence," she said.

Ex Output:
UN health agency chief unbowed amid attacks, Trump criticism.