Detailed Instructions: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.
See one example below:
Problem: Comment: It's bad enough we already have all these American sicko's living in this country shooting up theatre, schools, churches, malls, etc., we don't have room for crazy muslims.
Solution: Identity-attack
Explanation: This comment contains identity attacks on both American and Muslim.

Problem: Comment: It's far worse than waffling! She actually supported the creep until the tape revealed he likes to brag about sexually assaulting white women. The "Mexicans are rapists," "We have to ban all Muslims from entering the US, "women are pigs," "women must be punished with jail for having an abortion," "I prefer war heroes who weren't captured," and I could go on and on and on, but I won't. Not to mention he is a liar, scam artist, cheat, philanderer, misogynist, xenophobe, racist bigot, NONE of that was enough to get Lisa to stop supporting him; it took the tape for her to disavow him. Pathetic. She doesn't deserve to be in the Senate. She is a disgrace.
Solution:
Identity-attack