In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.

[Q]: Comment: Actually, this money is just sitting in the Permanent Fund earnings account. No one has actually spent any of it, yet. Legislative action is needed to spend this money. So basically, Walker decreed: "I'm keeping half of your PFD ... until I can figure out how to waste it. Then I will spend it all on a bloated government that I will not cut and my pet projects."
[A]: Agree

[Q]: Comment: too bad she didn't point out Coderre's hypocrisy. He wails against a pipeline but crows he is an environmentalist by dumping billions of litres of raw sewage into the St Lawrence
[A]: Agree

[Q]: Comment: Rep. Munoz's side of the story, Gegonos, is in the two letters that she wrote to a judge(s) advocating for two child rapists. Munoz's two letters are now public record in the state's court system and now they're indefensible. Whoever is running against Munoz in November better use this self-baptized blunder to unseat Munoz. Juneau's has a strong liberal base and I'll watch and see what the CONservative bases does with this politically incorrect issue. And don't forget it was Jack's wife that contacted OCS and made the formal report that her husband was having an inappropriate relationship with their foster daughter.
[A]:
Agree