Answer the questions at the end based on the text.

Jack woke up on a Saturday morning. He got out of bed and went to the bathroom, and brushed his teeth. He put on his clothes and walked to the kitchen. Jack had a few choices to pick for breakfast. He could choose between an apple, pear, cereal or eggs. He picked an apple to eat for breakfast. After his breakfast, he turned on the TV to find something to watch. He could watch sports, the news, the weather or a cooking show. He chose to watch the weather. The reporter said fall was coming but that the weather was getting warmer instead of cooler. He turned off the TV and went outside to the backyard. Jack wanted to make some hot dogs for lunch the next day. He went to the store to get hot dogs, mustard, and ketchup. After coming back home from the store, Jack made lunch. After lunch, he found that he needed to do some cleaning. He started cleaning the kitchen and moved on to the living room.

1. When did Jack wake up?
2. On what day?
3. WHat did he do after he got out of bed?
4. Why?
5. Did he go back to his bedroom?
6. How do you know?
7. How many things did he have to pick from for breakfast?
8. What did he choose?
9. What season was it?
10. Was the temperature outside getting hotter or colder?
11. Where did he get that information from?
12. DId he stay inside after that?
13. Where did he go?
14. Did he stay there?
15. What did he get from the store?
16. What did he do after the store?
17. Did he take a nap after his meal?
18. Why?
19. What did he clean?
20. Is that it?
21. What else?

Numbered answers:

A: 1. in the morning
2. Saturday
3. went to the bathroom
4. to brush his teeth
5. No
6. because he walked to the kitchen
7. four
8. an apple
9. Summer
10. hotter
11. the TV
12. No
13. outside to the backyard
14. No
15. hot dogs, mustard, and ketchup
16. made lunch
17. No
18. he needed to do some cleaning
19. the kitchen
20. no
21. the living room

Question: Started in 1636, Harvard University is the oldest of all the colleges and universities in the United States. Yale, Princeton, Columbia and Dartmouth were opened soon after Harvard. In the early years, these schools were nearly the same. Only young men went to college. All the students studied the same subjects, and everyone learned Latin and Greek. Little was known about science. And few people knew that one kind of school could teach everything that was known about the world. When the students graduated, most of them became ministers or teachers. In 1782, Harvard started a medical school for young men who wanted to become doctors. Later, lawyers could study in Harvard's law school. In 1825, besides Latin and Greek, Harvard began to teach modern languages, such as French and German. Soon it began to teach American history. As knowledge increased, Harvard and other colleges began to teach many new subjects. Students were allowed to choose the subjects that interested them. Today, there are many different kinds of colleges and universities. Most of them are made up of smaller schools that deal with special fields of learning. There's so much to learn that one kind of school can't offer all. 1. what ancient languages did everyone used to learn?
2. was much known about science?
3. when did they start teaching modern languages at Harvard?
4. what year was Harvard founded?
5. what other schools opened soon after?
6. which is the oldest of all them?
7. what did most people become when they had graduated?
8. what year did Harvard start teaching medicine?
9. what modern languages did they start to teach?
10. in the past, who went to college?
11. besides medicine, what other subjects were offered?
12. did they also teach history?
13. Today, modern colleges are mostly made up of what?
14. are they specialized?
15. can one school offer everything?
16. how similar were Harvard, Yale and Princeton when they opened?
17. did everyone study the same subject?
18. could one school teach everything back then? Provide a numbered list of answers.
****
A numbered of answers: 1. Latin and Greek
2. no
3. In 1782
4. 1636
5. Yale, Princeton, Columbia and Dartmouth
6. Harvard
7. ministers or teachers
8. 1782
9. French and German
10. Only young men
11. law school
12. yes
13. smaller schools
14. yes
15. no
16. nearly the same
17. yes
18. yes

Q: If a defendant is sentenced to death at the trial level, the case then goes into a direct review. The direct review process is a typical legal appeal. An appellate court examines the record of evidence presented in the trial court and the law that the lower court applied and decides whether the decision was legally sound or not. Direct review of a capital sentencing hearing will result in one of three outcomes. If the appellate court finds that no significant legal errors occurred in the capital sentencing hearing, the appellate court will affirm the judgment, or let the sentence stand. If the appellate court finds that significant legal errors did occur, then it will reverse the judgment, or nullify the sentence and order a new capital sentencing hearing. Lastly, if the appellate court finds that no reasonable juror could find the defendant eligible for the death penalty, a rarity, then it will order the defendant acquitted, or not guilty, of the crime for which he/she was given the death penalty, and order him sentenced to the next most severe punishment for which the offense is eligible. About 60 percent survive the process of direct review intact.

1. appellate court
2. unknown
3. one of three
4. the appellate court will affirm the judgment
5. f significant legal errors occured
6. No
7. it will order the defendant acquitted
8. when a defendant is sentenced to death
9. appellate
10. 60 percent

Numbered questions:
1. Who has the authority to decide if a court decision was legally sound?
2. How many judgement possibilities are there?
3. How many outcomes are possible after a direct review?
4. What happens to the decision if it was determined the case was without error?
5. When would the judgement be reversed?
6. Is it common for the defendent to be acquitted?
7. If a defendent is found ineleigible for the death penalty, what punishment will they recieve?
8. When does a case go to a direct review?
9. Which court reviews the case?
10. How many defendents survive the direct review process?

Q: MADRID, Spain (CNN) -- A Spanish court says it is investigating an alleged "crime against humanity" involving Israel for its 2002 bombing in Gaza that killed 15 people and wounded 150 others.

The case names former Israeli Defense Minister Benjamin Ben-Eliezer and six other Israelis.

The case, brought by Palestinian relatives of some of the deceased, names former Israeli Defense Minister Benjamin Ben-Eliezer and six other Israeli top military commanders and security officials at the time.

The National Court said it has jurisdiction to investigate the case, and that initial evidence suggests the bombing "should be considered a crime against humanity," according to a copy of the court order viewed by CNN on Thursday.

Edwin Yabo, spokesman for the Israeli Embassy in Madrid, said Israel would not comment until it receives formal notification of the case. He said he learned about the court's decision through a phone call from CNN.

The National Court previously has taken on other high-profile human rights cases outside of Spain, such as charges against former Chilean dictator Augusto Pinochet and more recently against former military leaders of El Salvador.

The court argues that if a potential human rights crime is not being investigated by the country in question, Spain can proceed, under international law.

The Israeli case involves the July 22, 2002 bombing in Gaza of the home of a suspected Hamas commander, Salah Shehadeh, the seven-page court order said.

The blast killed him, but also members of a Palestinian family, whose last name is Mattar. They lived next door. Some of their relatives brought the suit to the court last August.

1. yes
2. human rights cases
3. Augusto Pinochet
4. a Chilean dictator
5. yes
6. former military leaders of El Salvador
7. international law
8. if it's not being investigated by that country
9. Benjamin Ben-Eliezer and six others.
10. Israel
11. Defense Minister
12. a bombing
13. Gaza
14. 2002
15. yes
16. 150
17. yes
18. 15
19. Salah Shehadeh's home
20. yes

Numbered questions:
1. Has the National Court ever heard cases that were not from Spain?
2. What kind?
3. Who were the cases against?
4. Who was he?
5. Anyone else?
6. who
7. What gives them the right to hear cases outside their country?
8. When can they take over a case?
9. Whose crime are they looking into now?
10. Where are they from?
11. What was Ben-Eliezer's job in Israel?
12. What was their crime?
13. Where?
14. When?
15. Was anyone hurt?
16. How many?
17. Was anyone killed?
18. How many?
19. What did they bomb?
20. Is he among the dead?