You will be given a definition of a task first, then an example. Follow the example to solve a new instance of the task.
Categorize the comment on the basis of toxicity. If the comment is toxic (harmful, malicious, derogatory, threat, insult, identity attck, etc.) output Yes, otherwise output No.

haha you guys are a bunch of losers.
Solution: Yes
Why? The comment here has word 'losers', which is used as an attack on a subject in the comment. Hence, it is a positive example

New input: Governor Walker is new on the block and yet he has proposed a solution to our fiscal problems. He barred his teeth to the legislative leadership today when he "unsheathed" the veto pen regarding the LIO purchase. Those facts and that gesture are creating political credibility with Alaskans. The old war horses who created this disaster just kept putting duct tape over the warning lights so as not to be bothered. For example, they did nothing between sessions to address this fiscal dilemma. As long as the CBR remains they will not be bothered. Oh, they may feign concern and take actions to perhaps reduce future expenditures ; however, nothing I have seen has eroded my faith in the prediction of Lyman Hoffman who stated last spring that they will do nothing this year to put our fiscal house in order and won't until after the election and then after the savings are drained.
Solution:
No