Question: Sentence A: Suwak was supposed to attend a press conference introducing this revolutionary invention and then meet with the McPhilips people to initial an agreement for the launch of the mini-anti-aggressor on the consumer market.

Sentence B: The McPhilips people had plans to launch another device a year after the anti-aggressor.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question: Congress asked whether the experiences of these organizations could yield worthwhile lessons for federal agencies as they attempt to implement GPRA.
Congress asked if the experiences could result in important lessons for private agencies.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Problem: Here is a premise:
He sent two of his riders in first.

Here is a hypothesis:
He went in before his riders.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Sentence 1: um well like i said my fiancee

Sentence 2: Like I said, she's not my fiancee.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: no

Question:
yeah it's a it's a really good thing

Does it follow that "No way, it's a terrible thing!"?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
no

Question:
Based on the premise "The night's rowdy revelers get most of the attention surely Madrid must pack in more bars, discos and live-music venues per capita than any other sizeable European city.", can we conclude that "Madrid has a lot of live music venues."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
yes