QUESTION: We just wanted to let you guys know of some changes in order to keep the te= rminations being processed in a timely manner. It appears that all Netco e= mployees may be taken off of systems access for Enron this weekend. In cas= e this is true, Darron and I have transitioned from handling these requests= . Greg Couch is going to be leading the estate risk effort and Pat Ryder a= nd Chance Rabon will be handling all termination list issues. Please send = these lists to these three people in lieu of Darron and I. As a side note,= could you send an updated financial termination list(if this list has chan= ged since you sent it to me Kim) to these guys so that they can verify deal= s are moved to the proper book. It is probably a good idea for future term= ination scripts to come through Greg before going to IT because of several = book moves we have made to facilitate reporting to Ed McMichael. For examp= le the price book has been basically split into three books. Please shout = with any questions or concerns you may have. Thanks. PL
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: Terminations physical and financial
Stacy - With respect to Item 6 of Frito-Lay's Special Provisions, I propose that we modify that paragraph to read more like our ENFOLIO. My suggestion is that we replace Frito-Lay's Item 6 with the attached. Please review and contact Kim Ward as soon as possible with language acceptable to Legal. Thanks,
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: Frito-Lay language - change to Item 6 of Special Provisions
Attached are the recipes. I sent you them all because they all looked so good. Will you be talking to Steve? I left him a voicemail about the dinner. I have scheduled him for the garlic bread. I guess I will just mail him the recipe. - Black Bean Dip.doc - RoastRdPepperDip.doc - Cheesy Herb and Garlic Bread.doc - ShrimpGazpacho.doc - PorkChopsMangoBasilSauce.doc - ScallopedPotatoes.doc - DeathbyChocolate.doc
Answer: Church Gourmet
Here is an email: Can you please set up an EOL id for Matt Smith. His book names are ENA-FT-WC-SOCAL in tagg and ENA-IM-WC-SOCAL in sitara. Please forward to Matt and myself once that is ready. Thanks
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: new EOL id
Q: Gerald, See the attached schedule for Docket 010441, the Gulf/WFEC dispute. There is no schedule yet for the Gulf rate hearing. We expect that in early October and I will forward it to you. You asked about the effect of intervention in the rate case on the territorial dispute. In addressing this question it is useful to know that the FPSC rate hearing intervention rules are very liberal (Enron can intervene at any time) and that the rate case will not proceed rapidly. For procedural purposes, a prompt intervention decision is not necessary. Also, I think that Gulf has the stronger position in the territorial dispute. Because an Enron intervention in the rate case could confuse the staff and raise questions from WFEC, I think it best from ECS's perspective to await a decision in the territorial dispute before petitioning for intervention. I've reviewed the questions in Harry Kingerski's e-mail that you forwarded. Preliminarily, I note two corrections. First, we expect a decision in the territorial dispute in early December, not November. Second, Harry said that; "Gulf proposed surcharge treatment for the capital costs of Smith earlier this year, but eventually withdrew the application because the PPA it was trying to get in place, whereby Southern would take ownership of the plant and sell energy and capacity back to Gulf, drew a lot of flack". I don't know if it matters, but Susan Clark was told that Gulf withdrew the application because the discovery order in the docket would have required the release of Southern Company strategic planning material that Southern considered very confidential. Withdrawal was preferable to disclosure. (I recognize that this may be only Gulf's "spin" on the withdrawal and they may have withdrawn for exactly the reason Harry suggests.) The strategic questions posed in Harry's e-mail are complex and involve more than one Enron entity. His questions defy a prompt response, at least from us. We suggest that it would be useful to convene a meeting in Houston, including us and a representative from each wholly-owned and potentially affected Enron entity. That would facilitate the development and handicapping of a regulatory stance that is best for Enron. Susan's experience as a Florida Commissioner for nine years (and General Counsel for years before that) is useful in understanding the factors that inform staff's recommendations as well as a Commissioner's decisions in this context. (I've attached Susan's information.) Let me know what you would like us to do. Bill - The information in this and related pages was automatically generated from the Case Management System.doc - SFC BIO.doc
Propose a subject line
A: Schedule For Territorial Dispute
Here is an email: This Sunday, starting at 5:00 AM, Emergency Power Systems for the WTC Complex will shut down to test the emergency backups. This will not affect critical systems (computer room, phones, or the Real Time Group), as they are on both UPS and Generator. It will affect many of the non - critical computers and office machines on the 3rd and 4th floors of Enron. Please make every effort to power down all of your PC's and monitors when you leave for the day. Also, if you could help with a machine or 2 in your immediate area we would appreciate it. The IT group will be coming through around 4-4:30 today to power down equipment not in use and I will be in before the outage on Sunday to complete this. If you have any questions or concerns, please contact the IT dept. at any time. Regards
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A:
WTC Power Testing