Problem: Here is a premise:
If conducted systematically, can be widely useful in evaluation.

Here is a hypothesis:
It could be used across the board.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Sentence 1: uh yeah yeah yeah yeah we were really excited about the we're

Sentence 2: We were really excited about christmas presents that year!
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question:
On that fateful day, 14 July 1789, the king went hunting near his chateau at Versailles.

Does it follow that "The king went hunting in Germany."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
no

Q: If I guess I oughtn't to have put you wise, but in the States we know a real smart lad when we see one., can we say that "I should have let you know and made you wiser. "?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A: no

Premise:
"We excluded from this review proposed rules that were routine or administrative in nature (e.g."
Hypothesis: No rules were excluded.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

no

Sentence 1: he was supposed to pitch an exhibition in Mexico against Fernando Valenzuela

Sentence 2: Many people were looking forward to his exhibition pitch against Valenzuela.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer:
it is not possible to tell