[QUESTION] Can we conclude from "Two children are having a sack race." that "The kids are swimming."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
If kids are swimming they cannot be in a sack race.
The answer is no.

Q: Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "A woman in a lab coat is looking through a microscope."
Hypothesis: "A woman is enjoying a plate of spaghetti."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
A: One cant be looking through a microscope and enjoying spaghetti simultaneously.
The answer is no.

QUESTION: Given the sentence "Two men in a small boat rowing down a river." can we conclude that "Two men take a vacation on the river."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Let's solve it slowly: Not all men that row a boat down the rive take a vacation on the river.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

[QUESTION] Premise: "Two boys are playing ball in an alley."
Hypothesis: "Two kids are playing basketball."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
There are all kinds of different games that could be referred to as 'ball' so it is unsafe to assume that the boys are playing basketball.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

Q: If "Three people walking down a street lit up by business sign lights during the rain." does that mean that "Some people are walking outside in the dark and rain."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A: The street could be lit up by the lights without being dark.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

[QUESTION] Given the sentence "A hockey player tries to block the puck from the goal." can we conclude that "The hockey player will stop the puck."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A hockey player tries to block the puck from the goal does not imply that he will stop the puck.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.