In this task, you are given text for US Congressional and California state bills, your task is to generate a summary for this bill.
One example: SECTION 1. LIABILITY OF BUSINESS ENTITIES PROVIDING USE OF FACILITIES
TO NONPROFIT ORGANIZATIONS.

(a) Definitions.--In this section:
(1) Business entity.--The term ''business entity'' means a
firm, corporation, association, partnership, consortium, joint
venture, or other form of enterprise.
(2) Facility.--The term ''facility'' means any real
property, including any building, improvement, or appurtenance.
(3) Gross negligence.--The term ''gross negligence'' means
voluntary and conscious conduct by a person with knowledge (at
the time of the conduct) that the conduct is likely to be
harmful to the health or well-being of another person.
(4) Intentional misconduct.--The term ''intentional
misconduct'' means conduct by a person with knowledge (at the
time of the conduct) that the conduct is harmful to the health
or well-being of another person.
(5) Nonprofit organization.--The term ''nonprofit
organization'' means--
(A) any organization described in section 501(c)(3)
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and exempt from
tax under section 501(a) of such Code; or
(B) any not-for-profit organization organized and
conducted for public benefit and operated primarily for
charitable, civic, educational, religious, welfare, or
health purposes.
(6) State.--The term ''State'' means each of the several
States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto
Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, the Northern
Mariana Islands, any other territory or possession of the
United States, or any political subdivision of any such State,
territory, or possession.
(b) Limitation on Liability.--
(1) In general.--Subject to subsection (c), a business
entity shall not be subject to civil liability relating to any
injury or death occurring at a facility of the business entity
in connection with a use of such facility by a nonprofit
organization if--
(A) the use occurs outside of the scope of business
of the business entity;
(B) such injury or death occurs during a period
that such facility is used by the nonprofit
organization; and
(C) the business entity authorized the use of such
facility by the nonprofit organization.
(2) Application.--This subsection shall apply--
(A) with respect to civil liability under Federal
and State law; and
(B) regardless of whether a nonprofit organization
pays for the use of a facility.
(c) Exception for Liability.--Subsection (b) shall not apply to an
injury or death that results from an act or omission of a business
entity that constitutes gross negligence or intentional misconduct,
including any misconduct that--
(1) constitutes a crime of violence (as that term is
defined in section 16 of title 18, United States Code) or act
of international terrorism (as that term is defined in section
2331 of title 18) for which the defendant has been convicted in
any court;
(2) constitutes a hate crime (as that term is used in the
Hate Crime Statistics Act (28 U.S.C. 534 note));
(3) involves a sexual offense, as defined by applicable
State law, for which the defendant has been convicted in any
court; or
(4) involves misconduct for which the defendant has been
found to have violated a Federal or State civil rights law.
(d) Superseding Provision.--
(1) In general.--Subject to paragraph (2) and subsection
(e), this Act preempts the laws of any State to the extent that
such laws are inconsistent with this Act, except that this Act
shall not preempt any State law that provides additional
protection from liability for a business entity for an injury
or death with respect to which conditions under subparagraphs
(A) through (C) of subsection (b)(1) apply.
(2) Limitation.--Nothing in this Act shall be construed to
supersede any Federal or State health or safety law.
(e) Election of State Regarding Nonapplicability.--This Act shall
not apply to any civil action in a State court against a business
entity in which all parties are citizens of the State if such State
enacts a statute--
(1) citing the authority of this subsection;
(2) declaring the election of such State that this Act
shall not apply to such civil action in the State; and
(3) containing no other provision.
Solution is here: Shields a business entity from civil liability relating to any injury or death occurring at a facility of that entity in connection with a use of such facility by a nonprofit organization if: (1) the use occurs outside the scope of business of the business entity; (2) such injury or death occurs during a period that such facility is used by such organization; and (3) the business entity authorized the use of such facility by the organization.
Makes this Act inapplicable to an injury or death that results from an act or omission of a business entity that constitutes gross negligence or intentional misconduct, including misconduct that: (1) constitutes a hate crime or a crime of violence or act of international terrorism for which the defendant has been convicted in any court; or (2) involves a sexual offense for which the defendant has been convicted in any court or misconduct for which the defendant has been found to have violated a Federal or State civil rights law.
Preempts State laws to the extent that such laws are inconsistent with this Act, except State law that provides additional protection from liability. Specifies that this Act shall not be construed to supersede any Federal or State health or safety law.
Makes this Act inapplicable to any civil action in a State court against a business entity in which all parties are citizens of the State if such State, citing this Act's authority and containing no other provision, enacts a statute declaring the State's election that this Act shall not apply to such action in the State.
Explanation: This Bill focuses on shielding business entities from civil liability relating to an injury or death depending on the conditions of injury, hence the generated summary is correct.

Now, solve this: SECTION 1. FINDING.

Congress finds that the exchange of Federal land and non-Federal
land under this Act furthers the public objectives referred to in
section 206 of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (43
U.S.C. 1716) for the following reasons:
(1) On December 21, 2007, the Bureau of Land Management
issued a Final Decision Record and Finding of No Significant
Impact approving the Blackrock Land Exchange, IDI-35337,
between the United States and the J.R. Simplot Company, an
Idaho Corporation, involving Federal land in the Pocatello
Field Office in the State of Idaho.
(2) The Final Decision Record was issued as a result of a
multiyear review and public input process under the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.),
under which the Bureau of Land Management found--
(A)(i) the 2 parcels of Federal land comprising
718.56 acres that are proposed for conveyance to the
J.R. Simplot Company are managed by the Bureau of Land
Management in the State of Idaho; and
(ii) the conveyance of the Federal land described
in clause (i) is consistent with--
(I) the multiple-use statutory mission of
the Bureau of Land Management; and
(II) the Pocatello Resource Management
Plan;
(B) the 3 parcels of non-Federal land comprising
666.92 acres that are proposed for conveyance to the
United States--
(i) are owned by the J.R. Simplot Company;
and
(ii) provide greater resources and values
to the United States than the resources and
values of the Federal land, including through
the United States--
(I) consolidating Federal land;
(II) gaining direct access to
adjacent Federal land; and
(III) acquiring critical deer
habitat;
(C) the Federal land is adjacent to the phosphate
ore processing facility of the J.R. Simplot Company;
(D) carrying out the land exchange under this Act
would provide a buffer and an expansion area for a
possible phosphate disposal facility;
(E) the land exchange under this Act would not
authorize any potential future siting of a new
phosphate disposal facility or related facilities
because other governmental entities, primarily the
State of Idaho and the Environmental Protection Agency,
would still have the responsibility and authority to
make decisions relating to the approval of any future
phosphate disposal facilities; and
(F) after consultation with the Shoshone-Bannock
Tribes, a federally recognized Tribe with Tribal
headquarters at Fort Hall, Idaho, the Bureau of Land
Management determined that--
(i) the land exchange authorized under this
Act would result in a net loss of 52 acres of
public land; but
(ii) the loss of public land acreage would
be outweighed by the superior natural resources
acquired in the land exchange that would
enhance and increase opportunities for off-
Reservation hunting and gathering by members of
the Tribes.
(3) On June 5, 2009, the Interior Board of Land Appeals of
the Department of the Interior issued an order, numbered IBLA
2009-27, affirming the Final Decision Record of the Bureau of
Land Management.
(4) On May 3, 2011, the Federal District Court for the
District of Idaho issued a decision finding that the Bureau of
Land Management violated the National Environmental Policy Act
of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) by failing to prepare a full
environmental impact statement on detailed future uses, rather
than an environmental assessment, with respect to the proposed
land exchange.
(5) The Bureau of Land Management and the J.R. Simplot
Company--
(A) disagreed with the decision described in
paragraph (4); and
(B) argued that the Final Decision Record
adequately analyzed the foreseeable environmental
effects of the land exchange authorized under this Act.
(6) The fundamental disagreement over the level of analysis
needed to complete the land exchange authorized under this Act
raises the possibility of an endless cycle of Federal analysis
and litigation that has no certain outcome, not only for the
Federal land to be exchanged under this Act, but also for other
land owned by the United States that is identified for
disposal.
(7) The land exchange authorized under this Act--
(A) would permanently resolve the conflict relating
to the Federal land and non-Federal land; and
(B) is in the public interest.

SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS.

In this Act:
(1) Federal land.--The term ''Federal land'' means the 2
parcels of Federal land within the Pocatello Field Office in
the State, comprising a total of approximately 718.56 acres, as
identified in ''Exhibit A--Federal Land'' in the Final Decision
Record.
(2) Final decision record.--The term ''Final Decision
Record'' means the Final Decision Record and Finding of No
Significant Impact of the Bureau of Land Management issued by
the Bureau of Land Management on December 21, 2007, approving
the Blackrock Land Exchange, IDI-35337, involving Federal land
in the Pocatello Field Office in the State.
(3) J.R. simplot.--The term ''J.R. Simplot'' means the J.R.
Simplot Company, a Corporation in the State, with headquarters
in Boise, Idaho.
(4) Non-federal land.--The term ''non-Federal land'' means
the 3 parcels of land owned by J.R. Simplot, comprising a total
of approximately 666.92 acres, as identified in ''Exhibit B--
Non-Federal Land'' in the Final Decision Record.
(5) Order.--The term ''Order'' means the order of the
Interior Board of Land Appeals of the Department of the
Interior numbered IBLA 2009-27 and issued on June 5, 2009.
(6) Secretary.--The term ''Secretary'' means the Secretary
of the Interior.
(7) State.--The term ''State'' means the State of Idaho.

SEC. 3. EXCHANGE OF FEDERAL LAND AND NON-FEDERAL LAND.

(a) Requirement for Land Exchange.--
(1) In general.--Subject to the provisions of this Act, if
J.R. Simplot offers to convey to the Secretary all right,
title, and interest of J.R. Simplot in and to the non-Federal
land, the Secretary shall convey to J.R. Simplot all right,
title, and interest of the United States in and to the Federal
land.
(2) Deadline for completion.--The land exchange under this
Act shall be completed by not later than 90 days after the date
of enactment of this Act.
(b) Form of Conveyance.--
(1) Non-federal land.--Title to the non-Federal land
conveyed by J.R. Simplot to the Secretary shall--
(A) be by general warranty deed;
(B) be subject to existing rights of record; and
(C) otherwise conform to the title approval
standards of the Attorney General applicable to land
acquisitions by the Federal Government.
(2) Federal land.--The Federal land to be conveyed under
this Act shall be quitclaimed by the Secretary to J.R. Simplot
by an exchange deed.
(c) Maps and Legal Descriptions.--As soon as practicable after the
date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall finalize maps
and legal descriptions of all land to be conveyed under this Act. The
Secretary may correct any minor errors in the maps or in the legal
descriptions. The maps and legal descriptions shall be on file and
available for public inspection in appropriate offices of the
Secretary.
(d) Costs of Exchange.--J.R. Simplot shall pay, or reimburse the
Secretary, for all land survey, land title, deed preparation, and other
costs incurred by the Secretary in carrying out the land exchange under
this Act.

SEC. 4. VALUATION OF FEDERAL LAND AND NON-FEDERAL LAND.

(a) Findings.--Congress finds that--
(1) appraisals for the Federal land and non-Federal land to
be exchanged under this Act have been--
(A) completed under the direction and control of
the Office of Valuation Services of the Department of
the Interior; and
(B) approved by the Secretary in conjunction with
preparation of the Final Decision Record;
(2) the appraisals described in paragraph (1) determined
that the value of the Federal land exceeded the value of the
non-Federal land by approximately $5,000; and
(3) based on the appraisals described in paragraph (1),
J.R. Simplot would make a $5,000 cash equalization payment to
the Secretary to equalize the values of the Federal land and
non-Federal land in accordance with section 206 of the Federal
Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1706).
(b) Appraised Values of Federal Land and Non-Federal.--
(1) In general.--The appraised values of the Federal land
and non-Federal land approved by the Secretary in the Final
Decision Record shall be the values used for purposes of the
land exchange under this Act.
(2) No reappraisal.--The Federal land and non-Federal land
shall not be subject to reappraisal for purposes of the land
exchange under this Act.

SEC. 5. EFFECT AND JUDICIAL REVIEW.

(a) Effect.--The exchange of Federal land and non-Federal land
under this Act shall not constitute a major Federal action for purposes
of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et
seq.).
(b) Judicial Review.--The exchange of Federal land and non-Federal
land under this Act--
(1) shall not be subject to judicial or administrative
review; and
(2) shall not abrogate, or otherwise have any effect on,
the Order.
Solution:
This bill directs the Department of the Interior, if the J.R. Simplot Company offers to convey three identified parcels of land, to convey to the Simplot Company two identified parcels of federal land within the Pocatello Field Office of the Bureau of Land Management in Idaho. The bill states that the exchange of such federal and nonfederal lands shall not constitute a major federal action for purposes of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969.