In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine the neutral choice based on your inference from the statement and your commonsense knowledge. The neutral choice is a sentence that neither agrees nor disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3', corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence. If sentence X agrees with sentence Y, one's correctness follows from the other one. If sentence X disagrees with sentence Y, they can not be correct at the same time.

Input: Consider Input: Statement: Accordingly, sections 203 and 204 of the act, which require agencies to consult with small governments and solicit input from State, local, and tribal governments, are also inapplicable. Choices: 1. Sections two hundred three and two hundred four are inapplicable. 2. Sections five hundred and five hundred one are inapplicable, sections 203 and 204 are fine though. 3. The sections of the act required extensive changes.

Output: 3

Input: Consider Input: Statement: This would be unfair to the other candidates--and if done on television or radio, entirely illegal. Choices: 1. If this was done on radio it would be illegal. 2. Doing it to other candidates is legal on television. 3. Soliciting donations on television is entirely illegal.

Output: 3

Input: Consider Input: Statement: Besides, I have a theory about America's fascination with Italian said fascination is merely an extension of the world's love for everything Italian--culture, opera, food, art, architecture. Choices: 1. Americans envy the vast history and culture of Italy. 2. Americans do not have any interest in Italian culture. 3. America has a fascination with Italy-- culture, food, everything.
Output: 1