Categorize the comment on the basis of severe toxicity. If the comment is severely toxic output Yes, otherwise output No.
--------
Question: As I understand it, the current situation is this:
1 A Hawaii citizen has a registered firearm
2 This person is convicted of a felony in another state
3 The person returns to Hawaii
4 There is no system in place to inform HPD that the person should no longer have access to a firearm.
5 The person tries to register a new firearm
6 HPD finds out the person should not have any firearms, and requires the individual to give up his firearms

It seems to me that this problem should be solved at the federal level with this change in operations:
1 A Hawaii citizen has a registered firearm
2 This person is convicted of a felony in another state
3 The operators of the federal database inform HPD that person should no longer have a firearm
4 HPD requires the individual to give up his firearms upon their return to Hawaii

It is most likely that I'm completely misreading the situation, law, capabilities of the federal database, or a bunch of other factors. Can someone clear this up for me?

Answer: No

Question: No, you're pretty much an idiot, but you feel really good about it. Now your fellow idiots will chime in and say I'm not being civil. One day people like us will have a serious disagreement.

Answer: Yes

Question: Personal attacks? Cheap shots? Did anyone say she has a 'fat ass'? No. Her writing and her bias are being questioned. That is fair considering her refusal to interview those whom she targets in this article.

Answer:
Yes