In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.
--------
Question: Comment: Rats jumping On to the ship.

Answer: Non-sexual-explicit

Question: Comment: A well articulated opinion. Sadly, Ms Wente grossly underestimates the power of the vast hordes of broader public sector employees and their Unions to mobilize the vote for whoever is promising the status quo for them. So long as they are kept in the lap of luxury, with all the attendant 5-star perks that others can only dream of, no party preaching fiscal restraint can ever win. Exactly what Justin did, promising to spend more.
For all of Trumps darker sides, his pro economy pro business model is slowly starting to appeal to voters of all stripes, except perhaps the extreme socialists. It would be nice of other mature economies can emulate Trumponomics minus the unpleasant elements like anti trade, anti [legal] immigrant policies.

Answer: Non-sexual-explicit

Question: Comment: You don't seem to understand. It is easy for you to call people names such as fool, hypocrite, liar; compare them to Nazi war criminals; accuse them of committing one of the deady sins, etc from the safety of a combox. Would you do that in a face to face discussion where you might be forcefully reminded that such behaviour will not be tolerated?
I have free will and I consciously and freely choose to accept the Magisterium as the teaching of Our Lord just as you consciously and freely choose not to accept it.
Because you disagree with me, I don't call you a liar or a hypocrite, etc, why can't you extend the same courtesy to me and others?

Answer:
Non-sexual-explicit