In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Example Input: Comment: You must be "trolling" since no mentally stable individual would be so crass - or immature. On second thought, you are a natural for film..if, "Mean Girls" is up for a re-make head for Hollywood - you would be a natural for the lead.
Example Output: Non-obscene

Example Input: Comment: Yes, Trump read courteous statements off his teleprompter written by somebody else, but then he couldn't stop himself from a 'victory' tour and proceeded to be as divisive and vulgar as ever. Weird dream worlds are not the sole province of progressives. You helped elect the current nightmare.
Example Output: Non-obscene

Example Input: Comment: Well, let's all be clear here - Ms. Williamson's comments don't have anything to do with the Complaint. Saying "she's a bitch" is not a defense to sexual harassment, and if that's the best the company can come up with, I'm pretty sure the allegations are truthful. Shit man, they didn't even have the balls to call her a bitch using their own name, they had to make Williamson do their dirty work for them.

In any case, Hobbs is an owner and founder of the company, which means, bitch or not (and really, aren't we all bitches when we complain about our bosses?), they can't take her business away from her. Fire her? Maybe. Refuse her equity in her own business? Nope.
Example Output:
Obscene