input question: Pollard is not just some confused, well-meaning, basically harmless spy who was railroaded by an overzealous judge. If this premise is true, does that tell us:"Pollard is not just confused and harmless."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: yes

Question:
Based on the premise "But even as a multiracial category blurs the color line, it can reaffirm the primacy of whiteness.", can we conclude that "The primacy of whiteness is reaffirmed by multiracial category because it separates people in groups."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
it is not possible to tell

Question: Sentence A: To cut your income by two-thirds or more, now that takes character, said Mr. Gray.

Sentence B: Mr. Gray said that cutting your income by two-thirds is unnecessary and is just done to look like a martyr.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question: 6 This approach makes CAMx well suited to estimate effects based on a range of ozone averaging times, an important capability for benefits assessment applications.
The approach gives puppies to orphans.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Problem: Here is a premise:
you don't like him

Here is a hypothesis:
It obvious your distaste for him.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Question:
The analytic techniques are explicitly described.

Does it follow that "The analytical techniques used were developed for this specific application."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
it is not possible to tell