Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.

[EX Q]: You're going to try and make the argument 'if' you were Jewish???.
Look up the definition ,if you don't know it.
Your comment was anti-Semitic anyway you want to twist it, whether you're Jewish or not.
And you're not, hypothetical's don't give it validity,so don't play that angle.

You just answered your own question, that disregards the rest of your diatribe.
You said ' it's shameful practicing eugenics 'regardless of his being Jewish'.
There you go.
The issue of whether eugenics is bad or not is another issue.
But what difference does it make if he's Jewish or not?
Why mention it???
The issue of religious belief towards eugenics didn't come up in the article.
Religion wasn't a concern to Schnitzer.
That is what makes it anti-Semitic, any way you try and twist it around.
That he is Jewish had nothing to do with the topic/issue.
You threw it in there. You're an anti-semite (and you're not Jewish, that analogy is irrelevant. There you go. You just put your foot in your mouth.
[EX A]: Yes

[EX Q]: Ten bucks sez she's in one of those groups she labeled. She's just a contrary old bat. She sure gets under folks skin! If she gets paid for the comments she brews, she's a freeking genius! KK, RR, name some more... I had KK blocked on the other game. Life was good and I didn't have to scroll so much.
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: Did you hear? There's a whole 30 scientists in the film who disagree with the global scientific consensus!
[EX A]:
No