In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.

Ex Input:
Comment: Definitely NOT. Besides your ignorantly equating Christianity and Islam as being equivalent or the same when they are not, one, people indulging in their private sexual predilections, that does nothing but give them cheap thrills, is not the same as religion, particularly Christianity which is the foundation of civilization in Europe and the United States. Comparing what people do with their wing ding or other body crevices with Christianity is highly asinine. Two, there is no civil right to engage in any sexual behavior you want to engage in, based on nothing but just because you feel like it. Necrophilia, pedophilia and bestiality must be allowed also based on that.

But why the cherry picked hatred of Christianity and Islam? Buddhism and Hinduism are ok, but Christianity and Islam are not? Based on what do you make that distinction? Is that based solely upon whether some let you do whatever you feel like doing and some don't? That would be a myopic, self absorbed basis.

Ex Output:
Non-threat

Ex Input:
Comment: This home invasion crap is getting old. Death to the invaders I say. And it is always the same reason, drugs.

Ex Output:
Threat

Ex Input:
Comment: "Government is us" ?? If only ... :( If the writer took a glance at a history book, or just a cursory review of headlines from around the world, he would quickly realize that government (in general) doesn't represent the Will of the People, necessarily - just the will of the people who happen to be running the government!

Mr. Ablieter, the real threat to your Life, Liberty, and Pursuit of Happiness *doesn't* lie within the despised "1%" or the international corporations. There isn't a corporation out there that can make you spend a cent on their goods or services, if you don't really want to. However, the bureaucrats in your government (who by and large are unelected, unaccountable, and are protected by civil service laws that mean they can rarely be fired for any reason), can extract from you arbitrary amounts of your income, property, liberty, or even your life, under pretty nearly any circumstances that they care to define. :-/ Which is the greater danger? (You tell me!)

Ex Output:
Non-threat