Read the text and determine if the sentence is true (see options at the end):

Well, I was going to say no language whatsoever of preemption, abandonment, abrogation, or exchange in the 1790 copyright, but compare -- Copyright Act. But compare that to thefirst. there's Patent Act under the same clause, where there is that exchange there. The other thing, as this Court has said, there is no implied abrogation of common law rights which would be a doctrine which would be inconsistent with what the petitioner is arguing. Now --

Sentence: The only copyright was in 1790
Pick your answer from:
[+] Yes
[+] It's impossible to say
[+] No
No