instruction:
Read the given text and if it has abusive content then indicate via "yes". Otherwise indicate via"no".
We consider the content to be abusive if it contains any of the following instances: (1) Identity Directed Abuse (e.g., Content which contains a negative statement made against an identity. An identity is a social category that relates to a fundamental aspect of individuals community, socio-demographics, position or self-representation) (2) Affiliation Directed Abuse (e.g., Content which express negativity against an affiliation. We define affiliation as a (more or less) voluntary association with a collective. Affiliations include but are not limited to: memberships (e.g. Trade unions), party memberships (e.g. Republicans), political affiliations (e.g. Right-wing people) and occupations (e.g. Doctors).) (3) Person Directed Abuse (e.g., Content which directs negativity against an identifiable person, who is either part of the conversation thread or is named. Person-directed abuse includes serious character based attacks, such as accusing the person of lying, as well as aggression, insults and menacing language.) and (4) Counter Speech (e.g., Content which challenges, condemns or calls out the abusive language of others.). Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].
question:
This is actually nice. Having worked places like that, small gestures go a long way.
answer:
no

question:
> You wouldn't have sex with her? Do you want all your stuff thrown out on the street and set on fire? Because that's how you get all your stuff thrown out on the street and set on fire.
answer:
no

question:
> I feel that we just think differently or I have had different information presented to me in my lifetime. Rational people listen to people they don't agree with and understand their position. That's not what these people do. They don't listen, and they don't want *anyone else* to listen to the people they don't agree with.
answer:
yes