Q: Bob, On the Texas desk, the majority of our deals are nominated manually (on Excel or preprinted forms), with most of the information pulled from Sitara instead of Unify. So, these noms were not late. For a couple of 3rd party pipelines, we do use Unify. But we did not have nom changes for 5/4. Our only problem was sending noms to HPL. Which is sending information to yourself, but it still delays the confrimation process for the pipeline. This nom was sent about 30 minutes late. Let me know if you have any questions. Daren
Propose a subject line
A: Unify
IN: At the request of Bob Shults, I am attaching our proposed form of Letter of Interest. If the enclosed meets with your approval, please execute the agreement and return it to me via fax no. (713) 646-3490. I will then have it executed by Enron Net Works. If you have any comments or questions please call Mark Greenberg, Senior Counsel, at (713) 345-8897 or Bob at (713) 853-0397. We look forward to hearing from you.

Generate a subject line.

OUT: LOI - United Fuels International Inc.
IN: This is an email
Janelle and Tom: Ed Sacks and I need to speak with you in the a.m. about a few issues. I have questions about market disruption because Con Ed has asked: (1) that Market Quotation apply rather than Loss (in the event of Early Termination) Is this a very liquid market? ENA agrees to market quotation only for FX and short term deals in liquid markets (e.g., gas) (2) to jointly determine when a Market Disruption has occurred (after consultation) Usually ENA as the Calculation Agent makes this determination in good faith. (3) to identify two brokers/pricing platforms for purposes of determining the daily MTM Each party typically assesses its own MTM for valuation purposes (whether for collateral calls or termination, etc.). Sounds like Ed and I need to know what was said to Con Ed about marking (4) I think Con Ed was headed in the direction of asking that we each provide dealer quotes (rather than ENA coming up with two quotes in good faith) as a Disruption Fallback. Tom, I think we discussed this in a different situation. Ed and I agreed to conference at 10 am Houston time to discuss these and the draft docs (which were e-mailed to you).

What is the subject?

OUT: Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.
QUESTION: Please read the following carefully and retain this information for use whenever you trade on Bloomberg: 1. Bloomberg charges a $15 FLAT broker fee. 2. This fee applies whether you are the aggressor or receiver of a trade. 3. This fee applies each time you make a trade on Bloomberg i.e. $15 per hit or lift, regardless of volume 4. When you extend a Bloomberg deal in Deal Entry, account for each separate trade accordingly by adding $15 to any existing broker fee. ****** 5. Because this fee is FLAT, select the "FLAT" button to the right of the broker fee. ***** 6. And most importantly, make a note in the "BROKER" box that the broker is in fact Bloomberg. I know that many of you were never notified of the Bloomberg fee structure, but going forward we should see every trade done on Bloomberg showing up in the system as having been done with Bloomberg. The Confirms group in Houston has compiled a weighty list of "missing" hourly trades since the advent of Real Time Bloomberg trading. I believe these are all in the system, but possibly short a broker name and fee. This, going forward, should no longer be a problem. Please let me know if you have any questions regarding Bloomberg trading and/or fees. Thanks,
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: Bloomberg Fees
Jeff, I spoke with Jay briefly about the potential of archiving all physical deals every night into a separate database instead of deleting them. We currently are capturing that information in our database, but the feed Jay has is more extensive and reliable. We'd then be able to build some historical queries and facilitate some of the requests we have for this data, I don't anticipate it would take much time to do this. You have any objections? Thanks,
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: flexible deal view data archiving
Neither EWS/RAC/EGF employees nor family members or others living in their household or financially dependent on the EWS/RAC/EGF employee may purchase or sell securities of any entity (or derivatives thereof) listed on the Restricted List for your or their personal or related accounts or recommend the purchase or sale of such securities to any person, except with the prior approval of the Compliance Department in consultation with the ENA Legal Department. In addition to the trading restrictions above, should you at any time possess non-public material information about any public company, you, your family members and anybody that is financially dependent on you, are restricted from trading in that issue, and you may not disclose the non-public material information to anyone that does not have a business need to know. With respect to investments in privately held companies, you are responsible for complying in all respects with the policy entitled "Conflicts of Interest, Investments, and Outside Business Interests of Officers and Employees" in the July, 2000 Enron Corp. Code of Ethics. Please consult the Compliance Department with any questions you may have regarding a potential investment in a privately-held company. Company Name Stock Symbol 3 TEC Energy Corp. TTEN Active Power ACPW Adrian Resources ADRRF Applied Terravision Systems, Inc. TER CanFibre Group Ltd. CFGL Carrizo Oil & Gas Inc. CRZO Catalytica Energy Systems, Inc. CESI Crown Energy CROE CyNet, Inc. CYNE Enserco Energy Service Company, Inc. ERC eSpeed, Inc. ESPD FuelCell Energy, Inc. FCEL Hanover Compressor Co. HC ICE Drilling Enterprises Inc. IDF Impact Energy IEY Industrial Holdings, Inc. IHII Kafus Environmental Industries, Inc. KS KCS Energy KCS Nakornthai Strip Mill Public Co Ltd NSM SET Paladin Resources PLC PLR LD Southwest Royalties SWROY Syntroleum Corp. SYNM Tejon Ranch Corp. TRC TransCoastal Marine Services, Inc. TCMS Verado VRDO The Restricted List is solely for the internal use of EWS/RAC/EGF. No one may engage in discussions regarding whether a security is or is not on the Restricted List with persons outside EWS/RAC/EGF without specific clearance from the Compliance Department in consultation with the ENA Legal Department. No employee of any Enron Business Unit may engage in the trading of any Position for the benefit of any party other than an Enron Business Unit (whether for their own account or for the account of any third party) where such Position relates to (i) any financial instrument, security, financial asset or liability which falls within such employee's responsibility at an Enron Business Unit, or (ii) any other commodity not covered by (i) included in any Commodity Group. Position shall mean, collectively, the risk components (including, but not limited to, price risk, basis risk, index risk, credit risk and liquidity risk) of all products (commodities, financial instruments, securities, equities, financial assets or liabilities) which have been authorized for trading in the Enron Corp. Risk Management Policy, any of the Enron Corp. Policies or approved for trading through any amendments to this Policy. The prohibitions listed above do not replace or modify the policies set forth in EWS's Policies and Procedures Regarding Confidential Information and Securities Trading, Enron Corp.'s Risk Management Policy, or Enron Corp.'s Code of Ethics . Should you have any questions regarding the above, please contact me at ext. 31939
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer:
Restricted List