Premise:
"That is, a very high standard of inferential logic is needed."
Hypothesis: That needs a high level of inferential logic in order to be sure that he conclusions are correct.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

it is not possible to tell

input question: A taxi to the new sports stadium at Bukit Jalil takes you to the centerpiece of Malaysia's site for the 1998 Commonwealth Games. If this premise is true, does that tell us:"Taxis do not go to the new sports stadium."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: no

Question:
Based on the premise "A trip to Pamukkale usually includes a visit to the site of the ancient city of Aphrodisias.", can we conclude that "Most of the time, when someone goes to Pamukkale, they also go to Aphrodisias. "? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
yes

Question: Sentence A: Why should they?

Sentence B: Everybody does it.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question: The corrupting thing about compulsory voluntarism is that it preys on the high-minded to the benefit of the unscrupulous.
Compulsory voluntarism preys on the high-minded's ability to figure things out.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Problem: Here is a premise:
Such simulations can illustrate the long-term economic consequences of saving choices that are made today.

Here is a hypothesis:
What is done today has no affect on the long term consequences.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer:
no