Given a paragraph about movies and a set of conversational questions and answers about the paragraph, say whether the passage contains sufficient information to answer the follow-up question. Say Yes if it is answerable; otherwise, say No. The paragraph has the prefix 'CONTEXT:'. Each conversation question has a prefix 'Q:' followed by the answer prefix 'A:', and the follow-up question has a prefix 'FOLLOWUP_Q:'.

[EX Q]: CONTEXT: Spoilers if you have not seen season 4 episode 13 (not sure if this should be in a spoiler block, remove if you wish): Yes. Walt wants Jesse to think that Gus poisoned Brock so Jesse will help him kill Gus. Now, for this to work, he needs Gus to have some plausible motivation. The one that makes the most sense is that Gus poisoned Brock so that Jesse would kill Walt out of anger. From Gus' point of view, this is ideal as Jesse was the one holding Gus back from killing Walt If Jesse himself kills Walt then this is out of the question. Now, for this constructed fantasy to work, when Jesse comes to Walt's house, he must have the opportunity to kill Walt. Only then can Walt feign that he thinks that Jesse has come to kill him and put forward the argument that Gus manipulated Jesse into this position so that Walt would be killed. To this end, Walt left the gun on the couch on purpose. <sep> Q: Jesse was mad at Walt and Walt left the gun on the couch, was that intentional? A: Spoilers if you have not seen season 4 episode 13 (not sure if this should be in a spoiler block, remove if you wish <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: How did Jesse lear that Brock had been poisoned?
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: CONTEXT: My guess is that Vinay did not know Anjali before their meeting at the jewelry shop. I infer this from analyzing the character of Vinay. He doesn't appear like someone who will use crooked methods. Also, regarding the sog sequence, I think it was a mere coincidence, intentionally plotted by the director to create mystery. <sep> Q: Does Vinay know Anjali before meeting her at the jewelry shop? A: My guess is that Vinay did not know Anjali before their meeting at the jewelry shop Q: Why do you think that he did not know her? A: I infer this from analyzing the character of Vinay Q: Do yuo think that he was not brazen enough to sek employment knowing the owners daughter was who he was interested in? A: He doesn't appear like someone who will use crooked methods Q: Is it possible that he knew her but played like he did not? A: I think it was a mere coincidence, intentionally plotted by the director to create mystery <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Or was it a mere coincidence that Dav happened to be on the same road as Tanuja?
[EX A]: Yes

[EX Q]: CONTEXT: Max invites Jake to come and learn mixed martial arts with his instructor, while Baja invites Jake to a party at her boyfriend Ryan McCarthy's mansion and they were friends. However, Baja faced Ryan and breaks up with him on account that he beat Jake up. In his anger, he grabs Baja's arm and refuses to let go, even after she pleads. Jake appears and attempts to stop it, only to which Ryan insults his late father, saying "You're weak...like your old man...was". This insult has a negative impact on Jake's training that creates the vengeance throughout the movie.But eventually, Jake has won the respect of all his fellow students, up to and including Ryan and they become friends again..Of course,they were friends in Never Back Down. I think it definitely wouldn't be naive.!! <sep> Q: Are Max Cooperman and Ryan McCarthy friends in Never Back Down? A: Max invites Jake to come and learn mixed martial arts with his instructor Q: Was Max friend with Jake? A: Jake appears and attempts to stop it, only to which Ryan insults his late father, saying "You're weak...like your old man...was Q: Was there rivalry between Baja, Ryan, and Jake? A: However, Baja faced Ryan and breaks up with him on account that he beat Jake up <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Why did Max remain friend with Ryan after the Jake incident?
[EX A]:
Yes