Q: Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "A little girl is walking down a path lined with large trees."
Hypothesis: "The child was walking down the path to go to grandma's house."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
A: A child walking does not automatically imply that they are going to grandma's house.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

QUESTION: Premise: "A family sits on a bench in front of a pool."
Hypothesis: "The family is standing."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?

Let's solve it slowly: When someone sits they are performing a different action than standing.
The answer is no.

[QUESTION] Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "A man is climbing up a post at a sporting event."
Hypothesis: "A man is trying to see the game better."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
A man climbing up a post at a sporting event doesn't mean it is the same man trying to see the game better.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

Q: If "A dog jumps in the air to catch a tennis ball." does that mean that "The dog is asleep in front of the fireplace."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A: The dog can't be asleep because it's jumping in the air.
The answer is no.

QUESTION: Can we conclude from "Several parasailor's enjoying a windy day out on the water." that "The sailors hair is getting messed up."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell

Let's solve it slowly: Enjoying a windy day does not imply hair is getting messed up.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

QUESTION: Premise: "A fire hydrant that has been painted to look like it has a face."
Hypothesis: "There is a painting of a fire hydrant."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?

Let's solve it slowly:
Painting of a fire hydrant can not be a real fire hydrant.
The answer is no.