Q: Tana, several months ago you & I worked on a NDA with a company called 3PARdata. The lawyers worked together and reached a version that was acceptable to both sides. However, for several reasons we did not sign it on the Enron side. I would like to resurrect this agreement with one change. I need to remove EnronOnline, LLC as one of the parties to the agreement. The agreement would be with Enron Net Works LLC and 3PARdata, Inc. Representatives from 3PARdata will be here this Thursday (11/8) to disclose some confidential information. I would like to get our side signed and faxed to them before they COB Wednesday. I will take care of getting the Enron signature. Please call me with any questions or comments. Thanks,
Propose a subject line
A: NDA with 3PARdata
IN: Barbara, I am forwarding to you today a fully executed GISB for your client. Also, what is the status of your review of the Master Agreement? Does your client wish to proceed with this agreement? Please advise at your convenience. Best regards,

Generate a subject line.

OUT: GISB
IN: This is an email
TJ, Please put on my calendar for every Tues., thanks. Also, please notify my team that we will have a meeting with the marketing group every Mon at 3:30pm that Ed Baughman should be setting up with you. That should be a weekly thing too. Fletch

What is the subject?

OUT: TRADER'S ROUNDTABLE MEETING
QUESTION: Good morning, Enron's finance people are asking about the status of the turbine contract for Pastoria. Since Sheila is on vacation I thought I would check with you. Is it in final form, and if so, has it been executed? It would be a big help to get an electronic version sent to me. Thanks,
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: Pastoria turbine contract
It looks like we are done on the new Citizens deal effective July 1. I have sent original contracts for execution. We now have to put the deal in the system. This is a little complicated. The attached spreadsheet indicates how this deal will work, using June as an example. The only differences between June and future months are: 1) In the future, we will collect a $.09/MMBtu demand charge with $.02/MMBtu of this going to EAMR (ENA gets $.07/MMBtu) 2) In the future, the PG&E discount is $.10, not $.25. Some of the complicated booking issues are: 1. We need to show the John Cogan commission as a separate deal and a cost to ENA 2. We need to show the payment to EAMR as a separate deal and a cost to ENA 3. We will continue to bill Citizens for the TW Mainline cost on our utility deal 1 and 2 above are pretty straight forward and should not create any deal entry difficulties other than someone will have to enter the deals. Number 3 is more difficult. The complexities relate to where we are making the sale and what costs should be included. Can you get with the folks who can help us here and have them come up with a recommendation on how this deal should be booked? Let me know if you have questions. I also believe I can add value in speaking with Darren Giron or others. I guaranty their initial recommendation will not be 100% workable. Thanks!
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: Citizens Gas Deal
1. Be sure to verify that the underlying contracts do not allow cherry picking under any default scenario. If it does, amend the express language. 2. We have made 2 changes to the netting agreement forms on the basis of further review by Leslie Hansen of some provisions in our trading forms. The first change is in paragraph 2(a) to clarify the definition of Default. The second change is in paragraph 14(b) to delete the day limitation on claims of Force Majeure. We feel this should not be included in any physical contract that will be included in a master netting agreement, especially because of the current international situation and security concerns. See attached reline version to read the changes. 3. No changes have been made to the Collateral Annex. 4. Attached below are the new forms. Rather than continue with forms with and without the user notes, I put the user notes in a separate document. They are not at the back of the forms. Simpler. The attached forms are Master Netting & Security Agmnt 10 h a v1 (to use without collateral annex) and Master Netting & Security Agmnt 10 h v1 (to use with collateral annex).
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer:
FORM CHANGES: READ