Detailed Instructions: Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.
See one example below:
Problem: Baloney. You are going to see real action against Herr Trump and his white supremacist agenda.
Solution: Yes
Explanation: The comment suggests threat against Trump and his agendas and classified as threatening. Hence, it is a positive example

Problem: With all due respect, I am spot on. The Fire Chief in Fairbanks recently lobbied to codify Fire Sprinklers for domestic dwelling within the city limits , and was lobbied against by the insurance companies , and the AGC because of the additional, one time expense to the contractor( that would be passed on to the consumer ) of 5 or 6 thousand dollars. I am a retired Sprinklerfitter( in full disclosure ) and know a bit about that of which I speak. One needs far less fire insurance coverage when they have a Fire Protection Sprinkler System. Smoke alarms do nothing more than let you know you are on fire, Sprinkler systems extinguish fires. Hence there would be less justification for the high cost of fire insurance ( required by banks to qualify for a loan).
Solution:
No