Question:
Based on the premise "Yes? said Julius.", can we conclude that "Correct? said Julius?"? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
yes

Question: Sentence A: Then we might increase it to 8a and find that we saved 8.2a on the volume that shifted.

Sentence B: If we increase it to 8a, there is no possibility of us saving 8.2a on the volume that shifted.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question: uh let me ask you something did you get a catalog or something from these people yet
Did you receive a catalog?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Problem: Here is a premise:
Conversely, increasing demand for boilermakers that would result from a multipollutant rule should stimulate more workers to enter the trade.

Here is a hypothesis:
A multipollutant rule will indirectly attract a lot of new entrants into the boilermaker industry.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Sentence 1: so then i had to go back and buy two more oh Lord i was so frustrated with that but uh

Sentence 2: I needed to buy two more after that.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: yes

Premise:
"um-hum right some people have a rip theirs up just because they can't you know they can't resist them"
Hypothesis: No one has ever ripped own up for their own good.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
no