Question: Sentence A: Not far from Mount Herzl is the powerful complex of Yad Vashem, dedicated to the memory of the millions of Jews murdered by the Nazis.

Sentence B: Yad Vashem is 400 miles away from Mount Herzl.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question: Have some food, said A'deem.
A'deem suggested having some food.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Problem: Here is a premise:
In other words, there is no difference between my description of their argument and their own.

Here is a hypothesis:
Both descriptions of the argument are the same.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Sentence 1: The sunset reflection of the twin pagodas of Yakushiji in a nearby lake is one of Japan's most striking and visually poetic images.

Sentence 2: Many famous photos have been taken of this.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question:
So, one could visualize a postcrisis situation in which total output was unaffected; investment was smaller; the capital inflow was smaller or negative; and the won would reach an equilibrium level, lower than it had been before the crisis.

Does it follow that "One can visualize a different postcrisis situation."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
yes

Question:
Based on the premise "Never mind the crude complaint that it is too big, or too profitable, or that nerdy types tend to dislike its products.", can we conclude that "There are some complaints about the size, profitability, and appeal to the nerdy crowd about some of its products."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
yes