Given a paragraph about movies and a set of conversational questions and answers about the paragraph, say whether the passage contains sufficient information to answer the follow-up question. Say Yes if it is answerable; otherwise, say No. The paragraph has the prefix 'CONTEXT:'. Each conversation question has a prefix 'Q:' followed by the answer prefix 'A:', and the follow-up question has a prefix 'FOLLOWUP_Q:'.

Q: CONTEXT: The answer to that question is; no one will ever know. David Lynch knew he was onto something ethereal, so he prohibited any promotional photos of the baby and forced his SE crew to sign a release saying they could never talk about it. Lynch, himself, has always been elusive at best. All anyone will ever have is speculation, until Lynch decides to spill the beans. I want to add that the idea that the baby was living tissue has 2 main roadblocks; decomposition and Rigor Mortis. It is highly unlikely the baby was actually living tissue, though it may have been modeled on such. I have seen mention that it somewhat resembles a sheep fetus, so that may have been the vision Lynch worked from. Lynch would have needed several such fetuses for multiple days of filming, which just doesn't seem plausable. <sep> Q: What is the Eraserhead baby? A: The answer to that question is; no one will ever know Q: Where was the baby born? A: It is highly unlikely the baby was actually living tissue <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: How was the baby created?

A: Yes
****
Q: CONTEXT: Dawson was not called to testify as a legal maneuver. Criminal defense lawyers know when to withhold a testimony by the accused, because that would open up the prosecution's questions of his character. Dawson had the illegal fence-line shooting in his recent history where he shot at his counterpart. This was the same shooting Santiago reported, and was using to bargain his release from detail at Guantanamo. <sep> Q: Why was Dawson not called to testify? A: Dawson was not called to testify as a legal maneuver Q: He was ordered to operate Code Red. How come he wasn't called? A: Criminal defense lawyers know when to withhold a testimony by the accused, because that would open up the prosecution's questions of his character Q: What did the accused do exactly? A: Dawson had the illegal fence-line shooting in his recent history where he shot at his counterpart Q: Who reported the shooting? A: This was the same shooting Santiago reported, and was using to bargain his release from detail at Guantanamo <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Was Santiago a bystander or was he involved?

A: No
****
Q: CONTEXT: There were multiple Smiths that had assimilated on the other entities inside the matrix, both software and human. The primary difference in the end was that Neo was hardwired to the source and not jacked in from a regular pod or an illegal back door entry. When Smith assimilated on Neo, the machines get a hold of Smith's replication programming. This enables them to target and destroy the Smith program which causes the replication to be undone across the Matrix. In short, Smith had turned into a replicating worm which the machines couldn't get a lock on until the replication occurred on an entity (Neo) connected directly from the source. <sep> Q: How did they kill Agent Smith? A: There were multiple Smiths that had assimilated on the other entities inside the matrix, both software and human Q: how did the first one die? A: When Smith assimilated on Neo, the machines get a hold of Smith's replication programming. This enables them to target and destroy the Smith program which causes the replication to be Q: when Agent Smith turned Neo into his copy. How did the main computer realize that? A: Smith had turned into a replicating worm which the machines couldn't get a lock on until the replication occurred on an entity (Neo) connected directly from the source Q: what is the name of this movie again? A: matrix <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: did the main computer realize they were copies

A:
Yes
****