instruction:
In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.
question:
Comment: It's a couch. It, and this story, and any and all hullaballoo is ridiculous and a perfect example of the MSM making mountains out of molehills to fit a political agenda.

And besides, as many people have pointed out, numerous POTUSs of the past (including Great Saint Obama himself) would commonly put their feet on the Resolute Desk.

If Conway is showing a lack of respect or decorum for putting her feet on some random purchased couch that is barely a couple years old, then what does that say about Presidents who put their feet on a unique piece of American history? I mean... that LBJ was sure a disrespectful POS, eh?

Or is that just the narrative when it's a politico from a party you dislike? Biased garbage.
answer:
Non-sexual-explicit

question:
Comment: My remarks must be quite effective or there wouldn't be so many people falling over each other to try to refute them. If they were so crass and crazy to not matter a hill of beans or as Mr. Clark has claimed, counterproductive to my cause, the smart thing to do would be to let them go and self-destruct on their own. Mr. Clark and Mr. Kelley simply cannot not answer no matter how far I go. I must be hitting the mark somewhere.
answer:
Non-sexual-explicit

question:
Comment: "Arson in the second degree
164.315
A person commits the crime of arson in the second degree if:

By knowingly engaging in the manufacture of methamphetamine, the person causes fire or causes an explosion that damages ...Any property of another and the damages to the property exceed $750"

I think we need to add 'hash oil manufacturing' to this Oregon statute. Too many stoned idiots are out there playing chemist.
answer:
Non-sexual-explicit