input: Susan, the US My best friend is Fanny. She is clever and interesting. We always look after each other. The first week we met, I got sick and she looked after me every day. Betty, England My best friend's Ana. She is honest and serious. We were born in the same city in England. Then I moved to America with my family. I thought I would never see Ana again. When I went to college in New York,, Ana and I shared the same room! Ken, Japan I love to spend time with Daisuke because he is funny and smart. We enjoy talking about the funny things we did when we were children , and tell the same stupid jokes over and over again. Lily , Australia Linda is very confident girl and she is really kind. Some people may wonder why Linda and I are best friends because we are totally different, but I think this is why we are such good friends. 1. Who is Susan's best friend in the US?
2. Is she slow witted?
3. What is she?
4. and?
5. What happened the first week they met?
6. Who is Betty's best friend?
7. Is she serious?
8. What do Betty and Ana have in common?
9. Where did they go to college?
10. Who does Daisuke spend time with?
11. What do they enjoy?
12. about?
13. Who is totally different?
14. Do Susan and Fanny look after each other? Return numbered answers in your output.

output: 1. Fanny
2. no
3. clever
4. interesting
5. I got sick and she looked after me
6. Ana
7. yes
8. they were born in the same city in England.
9. New York
10. I do
11. talking
12. funny things
13. Linda
14. yes

input: CHAPTER LII.

SHOWING HOW THINGS WENT ON AT NONINGSBY.

Yes, Lady Staveley had known it before. She had given a fairly correct guess at the state of her daughter's affections, though she had not perhaps acknowledged to herself the intensity of her daughter's feelings. But the fact might not have mattered if it had never been told. Madeline might have overcome this love for Mr. Graham, and all might have been well if she had never mentioned it. But now the mischief was done. She had acknowledged to her mother,--and, which was perhaps worse, she had acknowledged to herself,--that her heart was gone, and Lady Staveley saw no cure for the evil. Had this happened but a few hours earlier she would have spoken with much less of encouragement to Peregrine Orme.

And Felix Graham was not only in the house, but was to remain there for yet a while longer, spending a very considerable portion of his time in the drawing-room. He was to come down on this very day at three o'clock, after an early dinner, and on the next day he was to be promoted to the dining-room. As a son-in-law he was quite ineligible. He had, as Lady Staveley understood, no private fortune, and he belonged to a profession which he would not follow in the only way by which it was possible to earn an income by it. Such being the case, her daughter, whom of all girls she knew to be the most retiring, the least likely to speak of such feelings unless driven to it by great stress,--her daughter had positively declared to her that she was in love with this man! Could anything be more hopeless? Could any position be more trying? 1. Who was the woman's daughter enamored with?
2. What was the daughter's name?
3. And her mom?
4. Had she admitted her feelings to her mom?
5. To herself?
6. Did her mom see a solution for the situation?
7. Where was the man currently?
8. Where did he spend a lot of time there?
9. Was he going to be there for awhile?
10. When was he expected today?
11. Was he wealthy?
12. Did he have a promising occupation?
13. Did the mother feel he was a suitable husband?
14. How did she describe his level of sutability?
15. Who else had the mother spoken to?
16. Was her daughter outgoing?
17. How did her mom characterize her personality?
18. Did the mom find the situation hopeful? Return numbered answers in your output.

output: 1. Mr. Graham
2. Madeline
3. Lady Staveley
4. Yes
5. Yes
6. No
7. The house,
8. The drawing-room
9. Yes
10. Three o'clock,
11. No.
12. No.
13. No.
14. Quite ineligible
15. Peregrine Orme.
16. No
17. Retiring
18. No

input: In biological classification, class () is:

The composition of each class is determined by a taxonomist. Often there is no exact agreement, with different taxonomists taking different positions. There are no hard rules that a taxonomist needs to follow in describing a class, but for well-known animals there is likely to be consensus.

In botany, classes are now rarely discussed. Since the first publication of the APG system in 1998, which proposed a taxonomy of the flowering plants up to the level of orders, many sources have preferred to treat ranks higher than orders as informal clades. Where formal ranks have been assigned, the ranks have been reduced to a very much lower level, e.g. class Equisitopsida for the land plants, with the major divisions within the class assigned to subclasses and superorders.

For some clades, a number of alternative classifications are used.

The class as a distinct rank of biological classification having its own distinctive name (and not just called a "top-level genus" "(genus summum)" was first introduced by the French botanist Joseph Pitton de Tournefort in his classification of plants that appeared in his "Elements de botanique", 1694.

In the first edition of his "Systema Naturae" (1735). Carl Linnaeus divided all three of his kingdoms of Nature (minerals, plants, and animals) into classes. Only in the animal kingdom are Linnaeus's classes similar to the classes used today; his classes and orders of plants were never intended to represent natural groups, but rather to provide a convenient "artificial key" according to his "Systema Sexuale", largely based on the arrangement of flowers. 1. Who published about nature in the 18th century?
2. what year was the 1st edition published?
3. the name of the book?
4. how many kingdoms did he have?
5. name one
6. another?
7. and?
8. what were each divided into
9. are they all used today?
10. are any?
11. what's the class determined by?
12. do they agree?
13. are there strict rules?
14. when did Joseph Pitton de Tourefort publish his work?
15. it's name?
16. his nationalist?
17. what was published in 1998?
18. are classes discussed in plant study now?
19. what did the APG suggest?
20. what did Linnaeus mean his plant classes to be? Return numbered answers in your output.

output:
1. Carl Linnaeus
2. (1735).
3. "Systema Naturae"
4. three
5. minerals
6. plants
7. and animals
8. into classes
9. no
10. Only in the animal kingdom are Linnaeus's classes similar to the classes used today
11. class is determined by a taxonomist
12. no
13. no
14. 1694
15. "Elements de botanique"
16. French
17. the APG system
18. rarely
19. it proposed a taxonomy of the flowering plants up to the level of orders
20. a convenient "artificial key