In this task, you will be presented with a premise and a hypothesis sentence. Determine whether the hypothesis sentence entails (implies), contradicts (opposes), or is neutral with respect to the given premise. Please answer with "Contradiction", "Neutral", or "Entailment".

[Q]: Premise: A: uh I picked up a bunch of Craftsman tools from the forties that my wife's father owned when he was alive B: Uh-huh. A: and so I do have a band saw and a router and, uh, things like that out in the garage. But I can't say I use them very often. <sep> Hypothesis: he uses them very often
[A]: Contradiction

[Q]: Premise: B: Well, you've got, well, any of the big cities you've got the different rival gangs and they're having their little turf wars over their little drug kingdoms and such, A: Uh-huh. B: And they get out their little Mac tens, they get out their little uzis and they're going to fight with them. And it doesn't matter what restrictions you put on that type of weapon or a class three firearm. If they want it they'll get it. I don't care if they've got to go down into New Mexico to get it they'll get it and they'll get across the border. Now my position, although, I have absolutely no use for a fully automatic weapon, anyway. A: Uh-huh. B: Since I am a law-abiding citizen and I have never had a felony, if I wanted to buy one, I don't think there should be that big of a restriction on it. <sep> Hypothesis: there should be that big of a restriction on it
[A]: Contradiction

[Q]: Premise: I'm sorry, I 've put you in an invidious position. If you're being run by Morton, he 'll want to hear all this. It won't do any harm but I 'd rather not give him food for thought because I consider him an idiot and I don't think he's capable of interpreting it correctly. <sep> Hypothesis: Morton is capable of interpreting this food for thought correctly
[A]:
Contradiction