You will be given a definition of a task first, then an example. Follow the example to solve a new instance of the task.
In this task, you are given text for US Congressional and California state bills, your task is to generate a summary for this bill.

SECTION 1. LIABILITY OF BUSINESS ENTITIES PROVIDING USE OF FACILITIES
TO NONPROFIT ORGANIZATIONS.

(a) Definitions.--In this section:
(1) Business entity.--The term ''business entity'' means a
firm, corporation, association, partnership, consortium, joint
venture, or other form of enterprise.
(2) Facility.--The term ''facility'' means any real
property, including any building, improvement, or appurtenance.
(3) Gross negligence.--The term ''gross negligence'' means
voluntary and conscious conduct by a person with knowledge (at
the time of the conduct) that the conduct is likely to be
harmful to the health or well-being of another person.
(4) Intentional misconduct.--The term ''intentional
misconduct'' means conduct by a person with knowledge (at the
time of the conduct) that the conduct is harmful to the health
or well-being of another person.
(5) Nonprofit organization.--The term ''nonprofit
organization'' means--
(A) any organization described in section 501(c)(3)
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and exempt from
tax under section 501(a) of such Code; or
(B) any not-for-profit organization organized and
conducted for public benefit and operated primarily for
charitable, civic, educational, religious, welfare, or
health purposes.
(6) State.--The term ''State'' means each of the several
States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto
Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, the Northern
Mariana Islands, any other territory or possession of the
United States, or any political subdivision of any such State,
territory, or possession.
(b) Limitation on Liability.--
(1) In general.--Subject to subsection (c), a business
entity shall not be subject to civil liability relating to any
injury or death occurring at a facility of the business entity
in connection with a use of such facility by a nonprofit
organization if--
(A) the use occurs outside of the scope of business
of the business entity;
(B) such injury or death occurs during a period
that such facility is used by the nonprofit
organization; and
(C) the business entity authorized the use of such
facility by the nonprofit organization.
(2) Application.--This subsection shall apply--
(A) with respect to civil liability under Federal
and State law; and
(B) regardless of whether a nonprofit organization
pays for the use of a facility.
(c) Exception for Liability.--Subsection (b) shall not apply to an
injury or death that results from an act or omission of a business
entity that constitutes gross negligence or intentional misconduct,
including any misconduct that--
(1) constitutes a crime of violence (as that term is
defined in section 16 of title 18, United States Code) or act
of international terrorism (as that term is defined in section
2331 of title 18) for which the defendant has been convicted in
any court;
(2) constitutes a hate crime (as that term is used in the
Hate Crime Statistics Act (28 U.S.C. 534 note));
(3) involves a sexual offense, as defined by applicable
State law, for which the defendant has been convicted in any
court; or
(4) involves misconduct for which the defendant has been
found to have violated a Federal or State civil rights law.
(d) Superseding Provision.--
(1) In general.--Subject to paragraph (2) and subsection
(e), this Act preempts the laws of any State to the extent that
such laws are inconsistent with this Act, except that this Act
shall not preempt any State law that provides additional
protection from liability for a business entity for an injury
or death with respect to which conditions under subparagraphs
(A) through (C) of subsection (b)(1) apply.
(2) Limitation.--Nothing in this Act shall be construed to
supersede any Federal or State health or safety law.
(e) Election of State Regarding Nonapplicability.--This Act shall
not apply to any civil action in a State court against a business
entity in which all parties are citizens of the State if such State
enacts a statute--
(1) citing the authority of this subsection;
(2) declaring the election of such State that this Act
shall not apply to such civil action in the State; and
(3) containing no other provision.
Solution: Shields a business entity from civil liability relating to any injury or death occurring at a facility of that entity in connection with a use of such facility by a nonprofit organization if: (1) the use occurs outside the scope of business of the business entity; (2) such injury or death occurs during a period that such facility is used by such organization; and (3) the business entity authorized the use of such facility by the organization.
Makes this Act inapplicable to an injury or death that results from an act or omission of a business entity that constitutes gross negligence or intentional misconduct, including misconduct that: (1) constitutes a hate crime or a crime of violence or act of international terrorism for which the defendant has been convicted in any court; or (2) involves a sexual offense for which the defendant has been convicted in any court or misconduct for which the defendant has been found to have violated a Federal or State civil rights law.
Preempts State laws to the extent that such laws are inconsistent with this Act, except State law that provides additional protection from liability. Specifies that this Act shall not be construed to supersede any Federal or State health or safety law.
Makes this Act inapplicable to any civil action in a State court against a business entity in which all parties are citizens of the State if such State, citing this Act's authority and containing no other provision, enacts a statute declaring the State's election that this Act shall not apply to such action in the State.
Why? This Bill focuses on shielding business entities from civil liability relating to an injury or death depending on the conditions of injury, hence the generated summary is correct.

New input: SECTION 1. FINDINGS.

Congress finds the following:
(1) Methyl bromide is a broad spectrum pesticide which
protects plants and agricultural products from a wide range of
insects, rodents, viruses, fungi, weeds, and nematodes.
(2) American farmers depend on methyl bromide to grow,
store, ship, process, and trade over 100 different crops.
(3) The agricultural community has no safe, effective,
commercially available alternatives to methyl bromide. Some
nonchemical pest control alternatives have proven effective in
small scale tests but are largely untested, much less proven,
for commercial food production purposes. The Environmental
Protection Agency's Office of Prevention, Pesticides, and Toxic
Substances reports that few substitutes exist, all of which
pose potential human health and environmental risks.
(4) In 1992, the Montreal Protocol on Substances Depleting
the Ozone Layer was amended to include methyl bromide.
(5) According to the 1992 Science Assessment Report to the
Montreal Protocol, agricultural use of methyl bromide accounts
for less than 3 percent of the threat to the ozone layer, and a
similar report issued in 1994 notes that the Earth's ozone
layer will return to normal by the middle of the next century
even if methyl bromide remains available to farmers.
(6) In 1993, despite the importance of methyl bromide, the
lack of alternatives, and many scientific uncertainties, the
Environmental Protection Agency, citing the Montreal Protocol,
listed methyl bromide as an ozone depleting chemical under the
provisions of the Clean Air Act and ordered United States
production frozen at 1991 levels and an end to production by
January 1, 2001.
(7) Given current alternatives, analysis at the University
of Florida predicts a 43 percent decline in affected vegetable
acreage in Florida. A 1993 United States Department of
Agriculture study finds that the ban will cost as much as
$1,500,000,000 in Florida, Georgia, California, North Carolina,
and South Carolina, the 5 States where methyl bromide is most
utilized.

SEC. 2. CONTROL OF METHYL BROMIDE.

(a) Definitions.--For purposes of this section:
(1) The term ''use as a pesticide'' includes farming and
post-harvest uses.
(2) The term ''pesticide'' has the same meaning as when
used in the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide
Act.
(3) The term ''control'' means, with respect to any
substance, any ban, phase-out, or other restriction on the
production, importation, export, consumption, or use of the
substance.
(4) The term ''Administrator'' means the Administrator of
the Environmental Protection Agency.
(b) Restrictions on EPA Authority.--Except as provided in
subsection (c) or (d), the Administrator may not--
(1) control the production, importation, or export of the
substance methyl bromide pursuant to title VI of the Clean Air
Act (42 U.S.C. section 7671-7671q) for consumption or use as a
pesticide;
(2) control the consumption or use of methyl bromide as a
pesticide; or
(3) require the labelling of any agricultural product
treated with methyl bromide.
(c) Existence of Substitutes or Alternatives.--The Administrator
may take any action described in paragraph (1), (2), or (3) of
subsection (b), or any combination of such actions, if the Secretary of
Agriculture has certified by rule that there exist viable, cost-
effective substitutes or other alternatives to the consumption or use
of methyl bromide as a pesticide for specified agricultural commodities
and products. If the Secretary has made a certification under this
paragraph, a control permitted pursuant to such certification shall
apply only with respect to those specified applications and to those
specified commodities and products for which the certification is made.
(d) Montreal Protocol.--The Administrator may take any action
described in paragraph (1), (2), or (3) of subsection (b), or any
combination of such actions, if the United States is required by the
Montreal Protocol to implement a control on the production,
importation, or export of methyl bromide for consumption or use as a
pesticide or a control on the consumption or use of methyl bromide as a
pesticide. The applicability, contents and timing of any such control--
(1) shall be no more stringent or restrictive than
specifically required by the Montreal Protocol,
(2) shall be equally required of all parties to the
Montreal Protocol; and
(3) shall include all exemptions, exceptions, and other
flexibility (including exemptions for production, importation,
export, and consumption, for both preshipment and quarantine
uses) allowed by the Montreal Protocol.
(e) Inconsistent EPA Actions.--All rules, standards and other
regulatory actions promulgated, published, or otherwise issued by the
Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency before the date of
enactment of this Act are repealed to the extent they impose a control
which is not specifically required by the Montreal Protocol.
(f) Savings Clause.--Nothing in this Act shall be construed to
affect the provisions of 40 C.F.R. Sec. Sec. 82.9, 82.10, 82.11, and
82.12 (relating to Article 5 parties and transfers), or any other
regulatory provisions granting exemptions, exceptions, or other
flexibility not prohibited by the Montreal Protocol.
Solution:
Prohibits the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency from controlling the consumption, production, importation, or export of methyl bromide for pesticide use, except: (1) as required by the Montreal Protocol of all parties; or (2) upon a Department of Agriculture certification of appropriate alternatives or substitutes.