[QUESTION] Premise: "A lone rock climber in a harness climbing a huge rock wall."
Hypothesis: "A rock climber climbing a rock wall."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A rock climber is the same as a lone rock climber.
The answer is yes.

Q: Given the sentence "A leather-clad man rides a bicycle down a street." can we conclude that "A man who looks like he should be riding a motorcycle is riding a bicycle."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A: Just because a leather-clad man rides a bicycle down a street does not mean it looks like he should be riding a motorcycle is riding a bicycle.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

QUESTION: Can we conclude from "Three people are standing at a concession stand outside." that "Nobody is at the concession stand."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell

Let's solve it slowly: Either there is nobody there or there are three people there. It can't be both simultaneously.
The answer is no.

[QUESTION] Premise: "Two athletes are jumping up to hit a ball over a net."
Hypothesis: "The two athletes are playing a game."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Hitting a ball over a net may constitute playing a game.
The answer is yes.

Q: Given the sentence "3 middle-aged men wearing cowboy hats ride brown horses in a field lined with a wire fence." can we conclude that "The women are in the city."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A: The women can't be in a field riding horses and in the city at the same time.
The answer is no.

[QUESTION] Premise: "A small child sits in a sink while holding a toothbrush."
Hypothesis: "A woman playing golf."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
A small child sitting in a sink cannot be playing golf.
The answer is no.