Question:
Based on the premise "In 2002, LSC continued to offer technical assistance to lower funded states to increase resources.", can we conclude that "LSC continued to offer technical assistance, even in 2002."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
yes

Question: Sentence A: The data-collection guidelines emphasize appropriateness of data-collection methods, evaluator training, and information sources.

Sentence B: Data-collection methods are not covered in the data-collection guidelines.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question: Do you think it is the one? I whispered eagerly.
I wondered if this was the right one.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Problem: Here is a premise:
According to APHIS, this rule has been reviewed under Executive Order No.

Here is a hypothesis:
This rule has been reviewed and is acceptable.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Sentence 1: okay so you were well i i got tested before i got hired too so but hum

Sentence 2: So we both got tested before we got hired, then.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: yes

Premise:
"The third palace entry is one of the square's masterpieces the 17th-century Golden Gate."
Hypothesis: The Golden Gate of the palace is from the 17th century.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
yes