Question: Sentence A: In planning the engagement, auditors should obtain an understanding of internal control7 as it relates to the subject matter or assertion to which the auditors are attesting.

Sentence B: Auditors get an understanding of internal controls.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Question: um and there i think that even though i'm on an eighty eighty eight at home that the speed is really quite adequate uh and and i consequently don't even really notice uh the the difference between the the fast machine and and the eighty eighty eight
I only enjoy using the fast computer.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Problem: Here is a premise:
i don't know i've been i've been sitting here thinking here because it was you know took a couple tries before i found somebody well you know i'm like i'm not really sure what i think about this um uh i mean the first thing is the oh if it's going to be mandatory it's got to be mandatory i mean everybody not just like you know poor people and all that you know but

Here is a hypothesis:
It's going to be optional and I've never thought about it before.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Sentence 1: It was deafening.

Sentence 2: The sound of the football game was deafening.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question:
You think I mind saying it, but I don't in the least!

Does it follow that "I actually do mind saying it at all."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
no

Question:
Based on the premise "Family problems seem a small price to pay for evicting two junk-food-eating freeloaders with a dog that uses your house as a fire hydrant.", can we conclude that "The dog was very well trained and never misbehaved."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
no