Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.

Example Input: The decision was made to ban smoking and drones in Eugene parks, yet it continues in spades at Amazon Park , Skinner Butte and especially Alton Baker. To boot, lawmakers want to give smoker's " a 3 month white glove treatment for 'education ' " That's infuriating for those of us who frequently exercise in our parks and routinely encounter/ breathe in second- hand smoke. This law is a huge joke, it will NEVER be enforced, and smokers will continue to have the unopposed the upper hand and run amuck, smoking to their heart's content.
Example Output: Yes

Example Input: He makes $200,000 a year working for Conoco-Phillips so we already know who he represents in the legislature. Plenty of men have earned sexual favors for buying a dinner costing a lot less than $100 bucks. So let's not argue about the power of paying for a nice dinner.
Example Output: Yes

Example Input: Hopefully Victoria's Secret will come up with some stunning things to go with Xtra-Tufs.
Example Output:
No