Question:
Based on the premise "The Court further asserts that these cases are different from Rust because the welfare funding restriction seeks to use an existing medium of expression and to control it . . . in ways which distort its usual functioning, ante, at 8. This is wrong on both the facts and the law.", can we conclude that "As well as this, the Court points out that these cases are different from Rust."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
yes

Question:
Based on the premise "(Should Clinton be able to watch the grand jury's reaction on a monitor?", can we conclude that "Should Clinton be able to observe the grand jury?"? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
yes

Question:
Based on the premise "To herself she said: "Of course, if father heard that he would have a fit! ", can we conclude that ""Father would have a fit if he heard that!", she said to herself while clutching her fist."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
it is not possible to tell