In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: Does the name Monica Lewinsky ring any bells? "I did not have sexual relations with THAT woman". Please understand AnnieO that "chequered" does not need to have a[sic] next to it. It is spelled correctly, this shows that you have no understanding of the English language outside of the USA, there is a world outside of the USA you know!

Output: Non-identity-attack

Input: Consider Input: Comment: BS as usual.

He used you and your ilk like a dirty rag, one has to muse as the alt left wakes up to this reality.

Well at least he approved the pipelines along with Trump approving Key Stone.

Should make for great media!!!!

Output: Non-identity-attack

Input: Consider Input: Comment: In other words, Marty is saying "I follow the magisterium without question, unless I question it. In which case, I weasel out of it by pretending that it is not the authentic magisterium." If I were to say that Marty is being a hypocrite, this would be called "uncivil", so I won't say it. I will just say that Marty is just as fond of the cafeteria as he claims I am.
Output: Non-identity-attack