During the last three decades of the 19th century a proliferation of anthropological societies and associations occurred, most independent, most publishing their own journals, and all international in membership and association. The major theorists belonged to these organizations. They supported the gradual osmosis of anthropology curricula into the major institutions of higher learning. By 1898 the American Association for the Advancement of Science was able to report that 48 educational institutions in 13 countries had some curriculum in anthropology. None of the 75 faculty members were under a department named anthropology.
If it is possible to answer this question, answer it for me (else, reply "unanswerable"): Who belonged to these proliferating organizations?
Ah, so.. The major theorists

The DIN system, officially DIN standard 4512 by Deutsches Institut fur Normung (but still named Deutscher Normenausschu (DNA) at this time), was published in January 1934. It grew out of drafts for a standardized method of sensitometry put forward by Deutscher Normenausschu fur Phototechnik as proposed by the committee for sensitometry of the Deutsche Gesellschaft fur photographische Forschung since 1930 and presented by Robert Luther (de) (18681945) and Emanuel Goldberg (18811970) at the influential VIII. International Congress of Photography (German: Internationaler Kongre fur wissenschaftliche und angewandte Photographie) held in Dresden from August 3 to 8, 1931.
If it is possible to answer this question, answer it for me (else, reply "unanswerable"): What was proposed at the VIII International Congress of Photography?
Ah, so.. a standardized method of sensitometry

The phrase "in whole or in part" has been subject to much discussion by scholars of international humanitarian law. The International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia found in Prosecutor v. Radislav Krstic Trial Chamber I Judgment IT-98-33 (2001) ICTY8 (2 August 2001) that Genocide had been committed. In Prosecutor v. Radislav Krstic Appeals Chamber Judgment IT-98-33 (2004) ICTY 7 (19 April 2004) paragraphs 8, 9, 10, and 11 addressed the issue of in part and found that "the part must be a substantial part of that group. The aim of the Genocide Convention is to prevent the intentional destruction of entire human groups, and the part targeted must be significant enough to have an impact on the group as a whole." The Appeals Chamber goes into details of other cases and the opinions of respected commentators on the Genocide Convention to explain how they came to this conclusion.
If it is possible to answer this question, answer it for me (else, reply "unanswerable"): In the judgement, it is stated that the aim of the Genocide Convention, at its most simplest, is preventing the destruction of which victims?
Ah, so..
entire human groups