Question:
Based on the premise "Great billowing streaks of flame, snaking to heaven and coiling up the sky.", can we conclude that "There was no fire, smoke or flames."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
no

Question: Sentence A: By way of improvement, senior executives adopted a new IT strategic direction and focus that tracked back to the companyas business prioritiesa acommon, lean and fast, global, and growth.

Sentence B: Executives decided to do nothing.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question: The corridors then continue 125 m (410 ft) to the burial chamber.
The burial chamber is reached by walking through 125m of corridors.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Problem: Here is a premise:
Duck through a low passage between two shops across the street to find the Til Mahadev Narayan Temple.

Here is a hypothesis:
Enter the Til Mahadev Narayan Temple by following the large open passageway.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Sentence 1: Good tidings about the shark no incident involving a swimmer, snorkeler, or diver has been reported anywhere in the FWI.

Sentence 2: The last shark incident involving a swimmer was in February of last year.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Premise:
"Take the long U.S. policy wobbles because it is always responding to the crisis du jour--the Cox report, WTO, the latest suppression of dissidents, etc."
Hypothesis: US policy is constantly responding to the latest crisis.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
yes