Given a paragraph about movies and a set of conversational questions and answers about the paragraph, say whether the passage contains sufficient information to answer the follow-up question. Say Yes if it is answerable; otherwise, say No. The paragraph has the prefix 'CONTEXT:'. Each conversation question has a prefix 'Q:' followed by the answer prefix 'A:', and the follow-up question has a prefix 'FOLLOWUP_Q:'.

[EX Q]: CONTEXT: It seems as though you answered your own questions, and that's the answer I was going to give: Caleb knew (or suspected) that Nathan had heard his conversations with Ava. If Caleb hadn't tried to get Nathan drunk that morning, Nathan would have known that Caleb ALREADY completed his plan, and he would have undone the computer code that Caleb altered. <sep> Q: Was Nathan listening in on his conversations with Ava? A: Nathan had heard his conversations with Ava Q: What were the conversations about? A: the computer code that Caleb altered Q: Why did he alter it? A: It seems as though you answered your own questions, and that's the answer I was going to give <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: What else can you tell me about Caleb?
[EX A]: Yes

[EX Q]: CONTEXT: I think what is really going on is that anyone going into the casino would be put under the spell of the lotus flower (assuming consumption) and after that just doesn't care. The "proprietors" of the casino don't care. Their whole purpose is to draw people in and keep them there. Any "authority" who would normally be keeping this sort of thing from happening would more than likely get drawn in by the flower as well, so too, wouldn't care. It's not illegal for a minor to go into a casino. It is only illegal for them to play the games. If nobody is looking or caring who is playing the games, let it ride. <sep> Q: How can Percy and his friends play all the games in casino? A: I think what is really going on is that anyone going into the casino would be put under the spell of the lotus flower (assuming consumption) and after that just doesn't care <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Are they teenagers or are they of legal age to gamble?
[EX A]: Yes

[EX Q]: CONTEXT: Simple: Agent Carter The spin off series takes place without Steve Rogers and happens in 1946/1947 after Rogers crashing the Wing into the ice in 1945 (and in series 2 Carter has moved to LA). So by the time they are reunited Steve has been away for at least 2 years and his yard is a bit overgrown. <sep> Q: Why was Steve Rogers' yard so overgrown? A: Steve has been away for at least 2 years and his yard is a bit overgrown <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Where was Peggy while steve was away?
[EX A]:
No