In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

Q: Comment: Milo is an openly gay man purports to be a Catholic and does part of his hate routine in drag. The Cardinal Newman Foundation should have itself in vapors if such a character comes to a Catholic university. Milo might corrupt the students and turn them gay.

A: Identity-attack
****
Q: Comment: As you well know, Shore, because you like me have taken advantage of it, there are no "civil comments" criteria or screening process at the National Post. And when mentally deranged characters like "Claude" ramp up the rhetoric with absolutely disgusting and obscene and unfounded libels about Harper or others, there is a tendency for others including me to shoot back.

Unlike yourself stalking me around multi-forums (an unhealthy obsession if ever there was one and frankly kind of creepy), I don't stalk you around and make copies of your posts. Therefore, I can't entertain the folks here with some of your most outrageous and bogus blather from the far out Liberal side of the political divide.

Tell me, Shore, are you a paid agent of the Liberal Party or an old school chum with a secret crush on Trudeau or simply a pain in the derriere?

Inquiring minds want to know.

OK, on second thought they don't ... you are a nonentity with the shallowness of a birdbath for an anorexic sparrow.

A: Non-identity-attack
****
Q: Comment: I think Sydney is correct, most people who work in the judicial branch are psychopaths with little to no empathy for their neighbors or the people they are supposedly charged with protecting. that is exactly what the job requires, they are becoming the bullies with no worries, as they are given immunity under the law for their actions. its a conflict of interest for the state prosecutor to charge them with a crime. why? because at that point the state becomes liable and could face civil claims (money) just as they are now facing with these claims.

A:
Non-identity-attack
****