IN: This is an email
Brad, Can you give me a status on where you are at with the review of the Lease Docs for the MEGS Facilities? I forward those documents about a month back. Gerald Nemec Enron North America Corp. - Legal

What is the subject?

OUT: Platform Lease
QUESTION: To all, Unfortunately I will only be available in pockets of time today. I am catching a flight back to Buffalo through Philly at 11:33 pm (ET). I will be landing in Houston at 4:51 pm. I would recommend that following steps be done in order to close the transaction today. 1. Lisa, Please get Rick Buy's signature for the DASH -- assuming that Reliant is the counterparty.
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: Sale of the Napoleonvile Land - Final Steps
Though the electronic copy is not yet available, we have faxed out a hard copy of FERC's "Order on Rehearing" issued today in RM01-9, "Reporting of Natural Gas Sales to the California Market." All requests for rehearing and clarification have been denied, as the requirement "is in the public interest...[and further] is necessary for the Commission to advise Congress as to whether it should change the existing regulatory framework..." Some major points are: (1) Arguments that FERC cannot require the info. from non-jurisdictional entities is disputed by citation to the NGA and FPA, allowing FERC to collect any information in order to advise Congress on a matter of urgent concern. The Commission also cites the FPA's authorization to investigate electricity issues, including the cost of generation (of which natural gas is a key factor). (2) In response to Enron's arguments, the order states the following: Enron argues that the data collection should be undertaken on an as-needed basis, not regularly; FERC simply denies this. Enron argues that the burden of reporting was underestimated; FERC says this may be true but is no reason to rescind the requirement. Enron argues that the reporting is not based on the business method utilized by the company and that it does not have the information on a daily pricing and volume basis (matched to physical volumes); FERC answers that data should be submitted "in a manner consistent with the way the particular gas seller does business." Examples are given in the text of the FERC order. If Enron is contending it should only file aggregate information, FERC finds this option unacceptable. Only Enron asked for an extension for the filing deadline, from 30 days to 45 days after the close of each month; FERC denies this request as unnecessary. (3) CPUC request for access to all information filed is denied. Sensitive price data will be exempt from public disclosure (with no exceptions) so that all parties must comply. The order also states, "Moreover, the purpose in seeking the information is to enable the Commission to understand the operation of the market for gas sales into California, not to investigate the conduct of particular participants in that market."
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: CA rept requirements rehearing denied
Gloria, Jim and Harry; Thanks for pulling us all together on Monday. We look forward to working with your group on merging the State Licensing and Utility Agreements into a common area, in order to keep the organization informed and up to date. I wanted to re-cap just a bit. The Services Group has state licensing responsibility for Gas and Power for EESI and EEMC. We handle new licensing and renewals. We are on an "auto-reminder" distribution from EES legal, Heather Mathis for renewals/reporting. We physically house all documentation relating to licensing on our floor. We currently publish and distribute as needed State License status report which identifies where we are licensed and what our license # is. The Services Group works directly with Gloria for utility agreements, as we are one of many groups who she obtains sign-off from and/or information in order to execute agreements and State Licensing information is critical to her processes. Gloria and I met yesterday to discuss next steps. We are working together to provide the following. 1) Matrix of Executed Agreements which includes: State, License #, UDC, Agreement Type, Signatory, Date Issued, Expiration/Renewal, Security Requirements. (2 Weeks) 2) Backfill each groups need for documentation - provide copies of State Licenses and/or UDC agreements. (2 Weeks) 3) Identify the EES/ENE contacts sent to the State/UDC, update as needed, internally and externally. (2 - 3 Weeks) 4) Provide Summary information regarding State/UDC that can be placed on EES Market Central (2-3 Weeks?) 5) Ensure information is updated, published, organized and accessible to all interested parties. - Gloria has initiated creating binders that will be housed on the 47th floor - we will encompass State information with the executed UDC agreements. Gloria, please feel free to add anything I have overlooked. I've attached the contact list currently used when obtaining State Licenses. This should help identify other stakeholders who you may want to speak with. Regards,
Answer: State Licensing/Utility Agreements
Here is an email: The name for the Canadian entity which will enter into both Master Agreements and individual commodity transactions is: "UBS Warburg Energy (Canada) Ltd.", as confirmed by Lou Eber: UBS Chief Legal Counsel. I am working on chasing down the parental guarantee issue. Dave
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: Canadian legal entity
QUESTION: As discussed at the meeting this afternoon attended by Jim Steffes, Becky Cantrell, Brian Redmond, Tom Martin, Pat Keene, and Jean Ryall (via phone): Objective: Obtain greater transparency and commoditization for transportation of natural gas from liquid points in the production area to markets. Government Affairs (1) Standard Contract Deliverables: (2) White Paper Initial Plan: (1) Set up meeting next week to discuss particulars of a standard contract. Attendees to include Jim Steffes, Barbara Gray, Jean Ryall, Leslie Lawner, Julie Gomez, Pat Keene. (2) Identify industry advisor(s) who is(are) well-respected within the Texas gas network who would be willing/able to sponsor the white paper. (3) Review Texas statutes and RRC Codes.
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS:
Texas Intrastate Regulatory Action