In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.
--------
Question: Comment: she is another one of them nasty hooked nose jew fcks, like so many in the media.. we need to expose these nasty jews for what they are.. and purge them from the media altogether.. they are the liars and anti american scum that has tried to turn USA in to a bankrupt cease pool

Answer: Identity-attack

Question: Comment: This Hitler argument is stale...arming people with military style weapons not only supports the crazy, it reflects our inability to understand why the vast majority of police favor the reasonable regulation of firearms ownership. They would also like to see regulation ammunition that's relates to the ability to kill them regulated. None of this minimal regulation would limit your freedoms...Canada has resonance gun regulations, Australia bans a number of styles of weaponry...they they both seem okay. The difference? Fewer gun deaths, fewer crazies with arms, and a clearer commitment to community safety. It's your children, our police, the neighbor down the street that desires reasonable consideration.

Answer: Non-identity-attack

Question: Comment: well, they are brown, they speak Arabic and call God "Allah" so they are probably Muslims in disguise, claiming to be Christians to get our sympathy. everyone knows "real" Christians are white and speak English.

funny, I notice none of our regular righties are expressing any anger over their Catholic compatriots despair and danger. they pay lip service to protecting the Christians in the Middle East, but heaven forbid they should actually help them.

Answer:
Identity-attack