instruction:
Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
question:
Candidate Trump will become the nation's interior decorator. He'll convert most red states to blue. Including Alaska.
answer:
No

question:
Boy, I seem to have gotten under your skin. No one is buying your pathetic attempt to tar my motives. My track record is too well known as a PITA of bad developers. You need to go lie down and let your heart rate come back to normal. Then read my piece again as a _true_ example of citing documented facts. You could learn a few things. -- Paul
answer:
No

question:
The arrest article indicates incest. That would make the (alleged?) victim the (alleged) man's son? I disagree with the other poster that these allegations are
made to ruin someone's life. Not that it never happens, but to carry it this far would take a whole lot of lying. I doubt that it's just a vendetta.
answer:
Yes