Question: Sentence A: The U.N. war crimes tribunal caught a suspected Bosnian war criminal.

Sentence B: A suspected Bosnian war criminal has been caught according to the article.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question: Returning to the hill, on the opposite side of the museum is the charming Igreja de Sao Pedro, an unusual church.
The museum itself draws many tourists every month.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Problem: Here is a premise:
Eclipse.... Drew set back the pedigree several equine generations.

Here is a hypothesis:
Drew ignored the pedigree entirely and disregarded the generations.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Sentence 1: According to the inspector, the state's concern wasn't the The guards were worried that if the chair broke apart during an electrocution, the thick, black, high-voltage wires screwed to the inmate might rip loose and electrocute everybody in the room.

Sentence 2: The guards were not worried about the chair.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: no

Question:
The only housing available was huts or tents, and the roads were generally quagmires.

Does it follow that "The roads were muddy and only huts or tents were available for housing."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
yes

Question:
Based on the premise "The relaxation of prohibitionist laws has brought them within easy reach of most of the American public, and the public has voted for them with its feet.", can we conclude that "The relaxation of prohibitionist laws has not brought them in reach of the public."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
no