Question: Sentence A: you see what i'm saying um-hum

Sentence B: You don't get what I am saying.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question: In 1994, EPA initiated a series of nine public meetings to hear their views.
The EPA cares deeply about the publics views.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Problem: Here is a premise:
These new LSC administrative provisions have been incorporated into each LSC appropriation since 1996, subject to some modifications made in the Departments of Commerce, Justice, and State, the Judiciary and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 1998, Pub.

Here is a hypothesis:
Since 1996, the LSC has had administrative provisions.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Sentence 1: After contacting attorneys about Take 2, Wagonheim is beginning to revise his projections.

Sentence 2: They are changing their projections.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: yes

Question:
And for genuine activism.

Does it follow that "Not genuine."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
no

Question:
Based on the premise "Voters may have come to doubt tax-cut rhetoric, but they still don't like the people who collect taxes.", can we conclude that "Voters believe all the tax-cut talk."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
no