Given a paragraph about cooking, and a set of conversational questions and answers about the paragraph, say whether the passage contains sufficient information to answer the follow-up question. Say Yes if it is answerable; otherwise, say No. The paragraph has the prefix 'CONTEXT:'. Each conversation question has a prefix 'Q:' followed by the answer prefix 'A:', and the follow-up question has a prefix 'FOLLOWUP_Q:'.

Ex Input:
CONTEXT: I am going to guess that you are likely getting british or irish breakfast sausage. The national dutch sausage, Frikandel, is minced, skinless, and not usually eaten at breakfast. There is a perception amongst the dutch that Americans eat nothing but meat and fat in huge portions. I did a semester abroad in the Netherlands. For the first few days, the host family fed me eggs and sausages for breakfast. I usually have some toast or cereal for breakfast. So, after a couple days I asked them if this is what they had for breakfast every day. My host mother said, "No, this is what we were told Americans have for breakfast everyday!"After a chat, they said they were buying British breakfast sausages and eggs for me. Their typical breakfast was a slice of bread, some cheese, and a very strongly flavored liverwurst. My tastes were not as developed back then. After two days of that I asked if there was any other breakfast choices. My host mother bought me suikerbrood. It is a loaf of bread with sugar baked in it. It was delicious! I told them that I enjoyed this new breakfast very much. This caused a lot of chortling for my two host siblings. It turns out that suikerbrood is a small children's breakfast. <sep> Q: Small emulsified breakfast sausages in Dutch countries? A: The national dutch sausage, Frikandel, is minced, skinless, and not usually eaten at breakfast Q: Have you been to Amsterdam or Brugges? A: I did a semester abroad in the Netherlands Q: Can you try to remember the name of these sausages? A: British breakfast sausages <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Are the ones you are referring to made of pork and chicken meat?

Ex Output:
No

Ex Input:
CONTEXT: Red lentils have no skin and are thus more absorbent. They literally sucked up the wee bit of water clinging to them along with their neighbors. Surface tension of the water couldn't be broken by the light-weight pulses. When crumbled apart, the brick doesn't feel pasty, no? Next time maybe pour lentils into water; either way, no harm to finished dish. <sep> Q: What made these red lentils 'brick' together? A: Red lentils have no skin and are thus more absorbent <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Do you have any other information on red lentils?

Ex Output:
Yes

Ex Input:
CONTEXT: I'd say that's not strictly true,mostly because no salt substitute I've ever seen can get the same taste anyway. "Real" salt is sodium chloride (and maybe iodine, or minor impurities if it's sea salt). Most salt substitutes are partly or mostly potassium chloride. This is technically a salt (chemically speaking) and does have a similar salty taste, but it doesn't taste quite like sodium chloride, and can be bitter or metallic-tasting. Some salt substitutes add herbs or other things to help make the potassium chloride more palatable. Sounds like your has some "regular" salt as well, if it's got a significant sodium content.So while you are right that there's likely a "catch," it's more likely to be that your salt substitute will never taste quite right, or will be bitter, and less likely that you'll be piling loads of extra on in an effort to get the right saltiness. <sep> Q: Is low sodium salt really effective? A: no salt substitute I've ever seen can get the same taste anyway Q: do you add more to get the full flavor? A: you'll be piling loads of extra on in an effort to get the right saltiness <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: is there another ingredient i can use?

Ex Output:
Yes