Detailed Instructions: In this task, you will be presented with a context from an academic paper and you have to write an answerable question based on the context. Your questions can be extractive, abstractive, or yes-no questions.
See one example below:
Problem: Questions are gathered from anonymized, aggregated queries to the Google search engine. Queries that are likely to be yes/no questions are heuristically identified: we found selecting queries where the first word is in a manually constructed set of indicator words and are of sufficient length, to be effective.

Questions are only kept if a Wikipedia page is returned as one of the first five results, in which case the question and Wikipedia page are given to a human annotator for further processing.

Annotators label question/article pairs in a three-step process. First, they decide if the question is good, meaning it is comprehensible, unambiguous, and requesting factual information. This judgment is made before the annotator sees the Wikipedia page. Next, for good questions, annotators find a passage within the document that contains enough information to answer the question. Annotators can mark questions as "not answerable" if the Wikipedia article does not contain the requested information. Finally, annotators mark whether the question's answer is "yes" or "no". Annotating data in this manner is quite expensive since annotators need to search entire Wikipedia documents for relevant evidence and read the text carefully.
Solution: how was the dataset built?
Explanation: This is a good question, and it is answerable based on the context.

Problem: As introduced above, the 'One Million Post' corpus provides annotation labels for more than 11,000 user comments. Although there is no directly comparable category capturing 'offensive language' as defined in the shared task, there are two closely related categories. From the resource, we extract all those comments in which a majority of the annotators agree that they contain either 'inappropriate' or 'discriminating' content, or none of the aforementioned. We treat the first two cases as examples of 'offense' and the latter case as examples of 'other'.
Solution:
What are the near-offensive language categories?