Thank you for attending, or sending a proxy too, the UBSWE migration meeting this morning. Wanted to update you with some "late breaking news". Legal will not have their compliance policy completed by close of business today, therefore we cannot publish all of the information that we covered in the meeting ... therefore we aren't going to migrate anyone on Sunday night as I had previously stated. So we have a little reprieve .... There is a possibility that we will migrate everyone Monday night ... I will communicate as soon as I hear a definite answer. We will continue to work through the issues/points you raised today (thank you, by the way).
Answer: UPDATE, PLEASE READ: UBSWE Migration
Here is an email: Heather, Do you know : If there are 3 strips in a deal that cover different time periods, say April 1 for a strip, April 2 for another strip, and April 3 - 31 for a third strip....if we plug in a price on only one of the strips, are the days from the other strips going to get valued properly? In the instances that we have had, all three strips were filled in and Risk valued the deal properly; it was just CARP and UNIFY that were reading three times the MW Month amount, which I guess in the end is a simple problem. Holden brought up this point and I wonder the same...do you know? Virginia
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: EnPower Deal Entry question
Q: Greg, I got confirmation from the Head Coach at JV that AR is not going to UT. He scored a 760 on his SAT and apparently overslept a retake exam. So I don't know if they actually pulled the offer, but it sure sounds like it. Either way, the coach told my wife he will not be a Horn. The coach is really dissapointed in AR. DG
Propose a subject line
A: Robinson
IN: I spoke with Mark and (after checking one point in the a.m. on jury duty) he thinks that the week of August 16 is preferable for the visit. I will verify this first thing in the morning. SS

Generate a subject line.

OUT: Brazil trip
IN: This is an email
Effective October 15, 2000, the retention period on tape recordings of trades done by telephone will be reduced from four months to one month. The tapes regarding significant transactions may be retained for such longer period as approved in writing by both the Head Trader and the General Counsel. Please propose those significant transactions on which you may wish to retain the tapes, prior to October 15, 2000, since the tapes on conversations older than one month (except with respect to litigation matters) will be destroyed on that date. If you have any questions, please contact Mark Haedicke or Richard Sanders. John Lavorato and Mark Haedicke

What is the subject?

OUT: Retention Policy on Trading Tapes
Dear Market Participants The attached new offer form must be used until an updated form is created. Changes from the previous form includes 1. Corrections to the award pages 2. New market participants added 3. Additional PTIDs incorporated 4. Removal of PTIDs referencing proxy locations 5. Correction to the resource name lookup formula If you use an older form, your offer will be rejected. Regards,
Answer:
NYISO - ICAP/UCAP Forms