Given a paragraph about movies and a set of conversational questions and answers about the paragraph, say whether the passage contains sufficient information to answer the follow-up question. Say Yes if it is answerable; otherwise, say No. The paragraph has the prefix 'CONTEXT:'. Each conversation question has a prefix 'Q:' followed by the answer prefix 'A:', and the follow-up question has a prefix 'FOLLOWUP_Q:'.

[EX Q]: CONTEXT: Agent K (Tommy Lee Jones) witnessed the death of Agent J's (Will Smith) father, who was killed by an alien in an act that could have been prevented by Agent K. Considering the time travel elements of the third movie, and the fact that Agent K from the past was aware of his future after Agent J told him, he has essentially lived with the fact that the father of one of his only friends in the universe died because of his own failures. Since the "past" elements of the movie took place in 1969, this means he's lived with this memory for some 40 years. <sep> Q: What happened to Agent K to make him so grumpy and emotionless? A: Agent K (Tommy Lee Jones) witnessed the death of Agent J's (Will Smith) father Q: So how did Agent J's father die? A: was killed by an alien in an act that could have been prevented by Agent K Q: Oh, so do you think that he was stoical and cranky because he felt guilty about that? A: he has essentially lived with the fact that the father of one of his only friends in the universe died because of his own failures <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Wow, so does Agent J know this is how his father dies?
[EX A]: Yes

[EX Q]: CONTEXT: He didn't have any solid leads to go on. He didn't know where he was being kept before he eavesdropped on Malcolm and he only did that because he was following his mother after she reacted strangely on the news Walter was dead. He only got that news after his last act of cleaning up the neighbourhood got him the clue he needed. If he knew where he was in the first place, he wouldn't of believed the mob guy (saying Walter was dead). <sep> Q: Why didn't Oliver Queen rescue Walter sooner than he did? A: He didn't have any solid leads to go on <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Do you feel he was tentative?
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: CONTEXT: It's not the same attack. In the first movie, Neo enters Smith's code and basically decompiles him from the inside, which presumably destroys him (though we know enough of him survives to resurface with "upgrades" taken from Neo). In the third movie, Smith overwrites Neo's RSI, which, because Neo is hooked into the Matrix directly from the machine city at the time, gives the machine city the opening they need to pump an antivirus into the Matrix and cleanse all of the Smith-infected code. This purges the Smith code from the Matrix completely, but has the side effect of killing Neo. <sep> Q: If Neo survived in the first movie, how come he didn't in the third movie? A: It's not the same attack Q: What attack was it? A: n the first movie, Neo enters Smith's code and basically decompiles him from the inside, which presumably destroys him Q: How does Neo enter Agent Smith's code? A: Smith overwrites Neo's RSI, which, because Neo is hooked into the Matrix directly from the machine city at the time, gives the machine city the opening they need to pump an antivirus into the Matrix Q: Ok, is there anything else you could share about the movie? A: This purges the Smith code from the Matrix completely, but has the side effect of killing Neo <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Does Neo actually die or does he survive because of the side effect?
[EX A]:
No