Question:
Based on the premise "All for the good of the cause.", can we conclude that "All to go against the cause."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
no

Question: Sentence A: In many instances, the best crane for the job is

Sentence B: A crane should not be used in any instance.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question: General Accounting Office, Managing for Emerging Benefits From Selected Agencies' Use of Performance Agreements, GAO-01-115 (Washington, D.C.: Oct. 30, 2000).
The president of the USA may use the General Accounting Office.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Problem: Here is a premise:
Consistent evaluation across the models would determine if they actually make a difference.

Here is a hypothesis:
Models would be evaluated consistently.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Sentence 1: Wilson's office, at 331 Fulton St., Suite 600, serves poor residents in the counties of Peoria, Tazewell, Woodford, Marshall and Stark.

Sentence 2: Poor residents in the countries of Peoria, Tazewell, Woodford, Marshall and Stark are being helped by Wilson's business, located at 331 Fulton St., Suite 600.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: yes

Premise:
"Insofar as the social insurance program applies to employees of the United States government, the terms and conditions are generally the same as the program for private employees."
Hypothesis: The terms and conditions do not vary for private employees or employees of the United States government.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
yes