Problem: Well, because I don't think that a per -- I don't think there is a per se rule that should apply here because this is a grant of Congress, to Congress to exercise its judgment as to what may be beneficial. There may be other constitutional provisions that come into play, or there may be other existing --

Based on the paragraph above can we conclude that "Other constitutional provisions affect the rule."? OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No

A: Yes

Problem: Uniformity is not a sine qua non, and this is where Pepin-Robarts in reminding us of the opting in and opting out facilities and raising the compensation in opting out provided the opportunity if there is a spirit of goodwill and of pragmatic compromise for working out arrangements to accommodate the increasing pluralism in our federal society.

Based on the paragraph above can we conclude that "Uniformity is a sine qua non."? OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No

A: No

Problem: As much as I know about the scientific community -- and, you know, you have to remember that's not my discipline. But as much as I know about what the high school science standards say, it would be in standing with that. As far as the scientific community, I really can't go there, because I know that there is a lot more about Darwin than is in that textbook. I mean, I can absolutely say that without knowing everything about Darwin or knowing everything about science.

Based on the paragraph above can we conclude that "The speaker doesn't know all about Darwin"? OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No

A:
Yes