Teacher: In this task, you are given text for US Congressional and California state bills, your task is to generate a summary for this bill.
Teacher: Now, understand the problem? If you are still confused, see the following example:
SECTION 1. LIABILITY OF BUSINESS ENTITIES PROVIDING USE OF FACILITIES
TO NONPROFIT ORGANIZATIONS.

(a) Definitions.--In this section:
(1) Business entity.--The term ''business entity'' means a
firm, corporation, association, partnership, consortium, joint
venture, or other form of enterprise.
(2) Facility.--The term ''facility'' means any real
property, including any building, improvement, or appurtenance.
(3) Gross negligence.--The term ''gross negligence'' means
voluntary and conscious conduct by a person with knowledge (at
the time of the conduct) that the conduct is likely to be
harmful to the health or well-being of another person.
(4) Intentional misconduct.--The term ''intentional
misconduct'' means conduct by a person with knowledge (at the
time of the conduct) that the conduct is harmful to the health
or well-being of another person.
(5) Nonprofit organization.--The term ''nonprofit
organization'' means--
(A) any organization described in section 501(c)(3)
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and exempt from
tax under section 501(a) of such Code; or
(B) any not-for-profit organization organized and
conducted for public benefit and operated primarily for
charitable, civic, educational, religious, welfare, or
health purposes.
(6) State.--The term ''State'' means each of the several
States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto
Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, the Northern
Mariana Islands, any other territory or possession of the
United States, or any political subdivision of any such State,
territory, or possession.
(b) Limitation on Liability.--
(1) In general.--Subject to subsection (c), a business
entity shall not be subject to civil liability relating to any
injury or death occurring at a facility of the business entity
in connection with a use of such facility by a nonprofit
organization if--
(A) the use occurs outside of the scope of business
of the business entity;
(B) such injury or death occurs during a period
that such facility is used by the nonprofit
organization; and
(C) the business entity authorized the use of such
facility by the nonprofit organization.
(2) Application.--This subsection shall apply--
(A) with respect to civil liability under Federal
and State law; and
(B) regardless of whether a nonprofit organization
pays for the use of a facility.
(c) Exception for Liability.--Subsection (b) shall not apply to an
injury or death that results from an act or omission of a business
entity that constitutes gross negligence or intentional misconduct,
including any misconduct that--
(1) constitutes a crime of violence (as that term is
defined in section 16 of title 18, United States Code) or act
of international terrorism (as that term is defined in section
2331 of title 18) for which the defendant has been convicted in
any court;
(2) constitutes a hate crime (as that term is used in the
Hate Crime Statistics Act (28 U.S.C. 534 note));
(3) involves a sexual offense, as defined by applicable
State law, for which the defendant has been convicted in any
court; or
(4) involves misconduct for which the defendant has been
found to have violated a Federal or State civil rights law.
(d) Superseding Provision.--
(1) In general.--Subject to paragraph (2) and subsection
(e), this Act preempts the laws of any State to the extent that
such laws are inconsistent with this Act, except that this Act
shall not preempt any State law that provides additional
protection from liability for a business entity for an injury
or death with respect to which conditions under subparagraphs
(A) through (C) of subsection (b)(1) apply.
(2) Limitation.--Nothing in this Act shall be construed to
supersede any Federal or State health or safety law.
(e) Election of State Regarding Nonapplicability.--This Act shall
not apply to any civil action in a State court against a business
entity in which all parties are citizens of the State if such State
enacts a statute--
(1) citing the authority of this subsection;
(2) declaring the election of such State that this Act
shall not apply to such civil action in the State; and
(3) containing no other provision.
Solution: Shields a business entity from civil liability relating to any injury or death occurring at a facility of that entity in connection with a use of such facility by a nonprofit organization if: (1) the use occurs outside the scope of business of the business entity; (2) such injury or death occurs during a period that such facility is used by such organization; and (3) the business entity authorized the use of such facility by the organization.
Makes this Act inapplicable to an injury or death that results from an act or omission of a business entity that constitutes gross negligence or intentional misconduct, including misconduct that: (1) constitutes a hate crime or a crime of violence or act of international terrorism for which the defendant has been convicted in any court; or (2) involves a sexual offense for which the defendant has been convicted in any court or misconduct for which the defendant has been found to have violated a Federal or State civil rights law.
Preempts State laws to the extent that such laws are inconsistent with this Act, except State law that provides additional protection from liability. Specifies that this Act shall not be construed to supersede any Federal or State health or safety law.
Makes this Act inapplicable to any civil action in a State court against a business entity in which all parties are citizens of the State if such State, citing this Act's authority and containing no other provision, enacts a statute declaring the State's election that this Act shall not apply to such action in the State.
Reason: This Bill focuses on shielding business entities from civil liability relating to an injury or death depending on the conditions of injury, hence the generated summary is correct.

Now, solve this instance: SECTION. 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ''Computer Equipment and Technology
Export Control Reform Act''.

SEC. 2. ANNUAL REVIEW OF CONTROLS ON COMPUTERS.

Section 4 of the Export Administration Act of 1979 (50 U.S.C. App.
2403) is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
''(h) Review of Export Controls on Computer Equipment and
Technology.--
''(1) In general.--In order to ensure that requirements of
validated licenses and other licenses authorizing multiple
exports are periodically removed as computer equipment,
computer communications and networking equipment, computer
software, and related technology, that are subject to such
requirements become obsolete with respect to the specific
objectives of the export controls requiring such licenses, the
Secretary shall conduct periodic reviews of such controls. The
Secretary shall complete such a review not later than 6 months
after the date of the enactment of this subsection, and not
later than the end of each 1-year period thereafter.
''(2) Review elements.--In conducting each review under
paragraph (1), the Secretary shall do the following with
respect to the export controls requiring a license described in
paragraph (1):
''(A) Objectives of control.--The Secretary shall
identify the specific objectives of the export
controls, for the 12-month period beginning on the date
on which the review is completed, for each country for
which a validated license is required. When an
objective of an export control is to defer the
development of a specific capability in such country,
the Secretary shall specify for what period of time the
controls are expected to defer such capability.
''(B) Quantity and performance.--The Secretary
shall estimate, for the 12-month period described in
subparagraph (A), the quantity and performance
(measured in Composite Theoretical Performance or other
relevant performance metrics) of computer systems that
must be obtained by each country for which a validated
license is required in order to defeat the objectives
of the export controls.
''(C) Availability to controlled destinations.--The
Secretary shall evaluate the effectiveness of the
export controls in achieving their specific objectives,
including explicit descriptions of the availability,
during the 12-month period described in subparagraph
(A), to controlled countries of computer equipment,
computer communications and networking equipment,
computer software, and related technology on which the
export controls are in effect--
''(i) from sources that do not control the
export of such items, and from sources from
which no effective export controls on such
items exist;
''(ii) as a result of actual or potential
diversion, including potential diversion of
software over international computer or
telephone networks;
''(iii) as a result of export license
authorizations from countries other than the
United States;
''(iv) as a result of indigenous production
in controlled countries; and
''(v) as a result of United States
regulations permitting exports to such
countries of items with minimal United States
content by value.
''(D) Economic impact.--The Secretary shall
evaluate the economic impact, during the 12-month
period described in subparagraph (A), of the export
controls on exporting companies, including estimates of
lost sales, loss in market share, and administrative
overhead.
''(3) Increase in thresholds.--After completing each review
under this subsection, the Secretary shall increase, if
warranted by the findings of the review, the following export
control thresholds, consistent with the obligations of the
United States under bilateral and multilateral agreements:
''(A) The performance levels at which computer
systems are eligible for delivery under a distribution
license.
''(B) The performance levels at which computer
systems may be shipped under a general license to
countries other than controlled countries.
''(C) The performance levels defining a
'supercomputer'.
''(D) The performance levels at which a validated
license is required for the export to a controlled
country of computer systems and peripherals, software,
parts, and communications equipment normally supplied
with such computer systems.
In any recommendation or publication for such increase, the
Secretary shall include the specific rationale for the
increase.
''(4) Default provisions.--If on the date by which a review
under this subsection must be completed, the review is not
completed or a report on the review has not been transmitted to
the Congress under paragraph (5), the performance levels
described in paragraph (3) then in effect, stated in terms of
Composite Theoretical Performance or other relevant performance
metrics, shall double, effective 90 days from that date. No
change in regulations or notice in the Federal Register shall
be required to implement such increase in performance levels.
''(5) Report.--The Secretary shall transmit to the Congress
and to the Computer Systems Technical Advisory Committee (or
successor technical advisory committee) a report on the
findings of each review conducted under this subsection,
addressing each requirement set forth in paragraph (2). Within
60 days thereafter, the Computer Systems Technical Advisory
Committee (or successor technical advisory committee) shall
transmit to the Congress a concise statement specifying its
concurrence or nonconcurrence with each matter contained in the
Secretary's report, along with specific reasons for such
concurrence or nonconcurrence.
''(6) Hearings.--The Secretary shall conduct public
hearings not less than once each year in order to solicit
information from all interested parties on all matters to be
addressed in each review conducted under this subsection.''.

SEC. 3. DE MINIMIS DECONTROL OF COMPUTER SYSTEMS.

Section 4 of the Export Administration Act of 1979 is amended by
adding at the end the following new subsection:
''(i) Removal of Controls on Computer Systems Valued at Less Than
$5,000.--
''(1) In general.--No validated license shall be required
under this Act for the export or reexport to any controlled
country of any digital computer having a net value of less than
$5,000.
''(2) Definition of net value.--As used in paragraph (1),
the 'net value' of a digital computer means the actual selling
price of the computer, less transport charges, to the customer
abroad, or the current market price of the computer to the same
type of customer in the United States.
''(3) No quantity limit.--No limit may be placed under this
Act on the number of computer systems to which paragraph (1)
applies that may be exported or reexported at any one time or
on the number of shipments of such computer systems to any
controlled country or end-user in a controlled country.''

SEC. 4. DECONTROL OF MASS-MARKET COMPUTER EQUIPMENT.

Section 4 of the Export Administration Act of 1979 is amended by
adding at the end the following new subsection:
''(j) Removal of Controls on Mass-Market Computer Equipment.--
''(1) Mass-market computer equipment defined.--For purposes
of this subsection, the term 'mass-market computer equipment'
means any computer system, computer networking equipment,
peripheral to a computer system, part or subassembly of a
computer system, or combination thereof, on which export
controls are in effect under this Act, and which will have been
installed for end-use outside the United States in a quantity
exceeding 100,000 units over a 12-month period, as determined
under paragraph (2).
''(2) Anticipatory review of mass-market computer
equipment.--Not later than--
''(A) 6 months after the date of the enactment of
this subsection, and
''(B) the end of each 1-year period occurring
thereafter,
the Secretary shall, in consultation with the Computer Systems
Technical Advisory Committee (or successor technical advisory
committee), industry groups, and computer equipment producers,
identify those items (including computer systems differentiated
in terms of Composite Theoretical Performance) that will be
installed for end-use outside the United States in a quantity
exceeding 100,000 units during the 12-month period beginning on
the applicable date described in subparagraph (A) or (B).
Estimates of numbers of items installed shall be based on
reliable estimates provided by producers of such items.
''(3) Action by the secretary.--Not later than 30 days
after an item is determined by the Secretary under paragraph
(2) to be mass-market computer equipment, the Secretary shall
either--
''(A) eliminate export controls on such equipment
and publish a notice of such action in the Federal
Register; or
''(B) in the case of an item controlled under the
terms of an export control regime in which the United
States participates with 1 or more other countries,
propose the elimination of controls on such equipment
in accordance with the procedures of the appropriate
regime and publish a notice of such proposal in the
Federal Register.''.

SEC. 5. IDENTIFICATION OF PROLIFERATION END-USERS.

Section 4 of the Export Administration Act of 1979 is amended by
adding at the end the following new subsection:
''(k) Identification of Proliferation End-users.--
''(1) Proliferation end-user defined.--For purposes of this
subsection, the term 'proliferation end-user' means any entity
that is engaged, directly or indirectly, in the design,
development, or production of nuclear, chemical, or biological
weapons or missiles and is located in a country that is not
party to a bilateral or multilateral agreement the purpose of
which is to limit the spread of such weapons and activities and
to which the United States is a party.
''(2) Publication of proliferation end-users.--The
Secretary shall, within 10 days after communicating to any
United States exporter (including by denying an export license
to such exporter) that any entity has been identified as a
proliferation end-user, publish in the Federal Register the
name and specific validated license requirements for exports to
such proliferation end-user. If such publication is not made,
such entity shall be deemed not to be a proliferation end-user
and exports or reexports to such entity shall not require an
individual validated license solely because of activities
described in paragraph (1).
''(3) Customer screening.--The Secretary shall not require,
as a condition of granting any general or validated license for
the export of goods or technology to any end-user in a country,
that information by the export license applicant be provided
regarding activities described in paragraph (1) by such end-
user, unless--
''(A) the Secretary has identified such country as
engaged in the design, development, or production of
nuclear, chemical, or biological weapons or missiles;
or
''(B) the Secretary has determined that there is a
specific risk that the exports will be diverted to a
country for use in activities described in subparagraph
(A).''.
Student:
Computer Equipment and Technology Export Control Reform Act - Amends the Export Administration Act of 1979 to direct the Secretary of Commerce to: (1) conduct annual reviews of export controls on computer equipment and technology; (2) increase certain export control thresholds if warranted by the review; and (3) report review findings to the Congress and the Computer Systems Technical Advisory Committee.
Exempts from license requirements for export or reexport to any controlled country digital computers valued at less than $5,000.
Directs the Secretary to: (1) identify specified items that will be installed for end-use outside the United States; and (2) publish in the Federal Register the name and specified license requirements for exports to a proliferation end-user (any entity engaged in the design, development, or production of nuclear, chemical, or biological weapons or missiles which is located in a country that is not party to an agreement, to which the United States is a party, to limit the spread of such weapons and activities).
Prohibits the Secretary from requiring a license applicant to supply information about proliferation-related activities of an end-user, as a condition of granting a license for export of goods or technology to such end-user, unless the Secretary has: (1) identified the end-user's country as engaged in proliferation activities; or (2) determined there is a specific risk that the exports will be diverted to a country for use in such activities.