Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.

[EX Q]: Only a blind and deaf man would think her foreign "policy" was anything but a big Zero
[EX A]: Yes

[EX Q]: You are probably right on this.
[EX A]: Yes

[EX Q]: Not her first time compromising integrity.

"Phil Knight is known for his huge financial contributions to universities, particularly Duck sports, but he also gives to the campaigns of both Democrats and Republicans. The rush job getting his Nike tax break extensions through a special session of the Legislature got us curious to see if his campaign donations line up with the votes. Ten Democrats took donations from Knight during the last few weeks of the last election: Peter Courtney, Chris Harker, Jennifer Williamson, Jenny Burdick, Jeff Barker, Jules Bailey, Arnie Roblan, Chris Garrett, Mark Hass and Val Hoyle. Looks like they all voted "yes" on extending Nike's tax breaks. Only five Dems voted "no""

Clearly she is well-liked by conservative billionaires. Not exactly an ideal progressive SoS candidate. If you don't like corporatism stop electing Democratic corporatists.
[EX A]:
No