Question:
Based on the premise "They are real and they are coming.", can we conclude that "They exist and are on the way."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
yes

Question: Sentence A: no no i'm in Detroit or not Detroit i'm in uh California

Sentence B: I am in Detroit, not California.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question: They tend to favor a trial with as much procedural baggage as can be attached.
They favor a trial with little to none procedural baggage attached to it.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Problem: Here is a premise:
The same restless energy drove both men toward invention.

Here is a hypothesis:
The men were filled with energy and excitement.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Sentence 1: Th' boys he nodded at Drew and Anse "were sittin' at that table, mindin' their own business.

Sentence 2: The boys were having dinner while sitting at the table.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Premise:
"The analysis concludes that the quantifiable costs associated with the rule are $600,000 for the Pension Consultant exemption, $18,000 for the Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization exemption, $300,000 for the Affiliated Adviser exemption, and $8,700 for the New Adviser exemption for a total of $926,700."
Hypothesis: The quantifiable costs for the Pension Consultant exemption exceeded $600k for the first time in over 20 years.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
it is not possible to tell