IN: This is an email
Jamie Serota and Allan Van Fleet with Vinson & Elkins have developed a one hour CLE program covering the antitrust issues encountered when non-regulated entities such as Enron compete with regulated utilities for market share. An outline of the program is attached. Jamie Serota and Allan Van Fleet will present the CLE program on Wednesday, August 22, 2001 at the Doubletree Hotel, 400 Dallas (La Salle B room) from Noon to 1:30 p.m. The program will be accredited for 1.00 hour of CLE credit including at least .25 hours of ethics credit. If you would like to attend please RSVP by Wednesday, August 15, 2001 by sending an e-mail to my assistant, Janette Elbertson. Lunch will be served.

What is the subject?

OUT: CLE Program - Antitrust Issues Relating to Regulated Industries
QUESTION: Ken and Jeff: As you know, last year Enron produced its first ever EHS annual report with some mentions of our new Corporate Responsibility program. We are producing this year's version, which is expanded both in the environmental reporting as well as our human rights and social initiatives covered. Mike Terraso and I would like to include an opening letter by the two of you (last year Ken signed it). Will you please review the attached and edit, comment or approve by next week? We appreciate your help with this.
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: Chairman and CEO Statement for the 2000 EHS annual report
Mark Taylor, who is in Amsterdam this week, just left me a voicemail reflecting a conversation he just had with Dave Forster, and asked me to relay the following information to you (don't kill me, I'm just the messenger)... With respect to your form of online GTC: It need to be revised, per Dave Forster by Monday, to be expanded to include the provisions necessary that will enable a non-Australian based counterparty (a counterparty could be U.S., Canadian, European or other country based), who may or may not have an ISDA Master Agreement in place, and may or may not have credit in place, to do a financial power transaction with Enron Australia. In that regard I am attaching as a template, our form of online "Deemed ISDA" GTC (for a weather transaction, the only type of financial transaction where we adopt the ISDA documentation instead of using our own form of confirmation). As you can see when you look at our "Deemed ISDA" form of confirmation, there are a number of provisions that our Deemed ISDA form of confirmation includes, such as authority and tax representations, "arm's length transaction" reps, acting as a principal rep, the deletion of section 2(c)(ii) of the ISDA Schedule (netting "in respect of the same transaction"), no language that each party has a copy of the ISDA form and has read it and understands it, your deletion of language re: written confirmations, definition of "Transaction" meaning the GTC+ISDA form+website terms, "Website" (uppercased) is a defined term under the Password Application, we usually say "Loss" instead of "Market Quotation", also, Market Quotation and Second Method will apply for the purposes of Section 6(e), a question, do we need the word "integrated" with respect to the rerenced that the documents contain a "single agreement" to fall under the U.S. bankruptcy swap protection?, no ducment conflict provisions, missing our "severability" and "setoff" language, no adoption of the 1991 or 1993 Commodity definitions, business day defined as Sydney only, etc. Of course, you do not have these in your form of GTC, because they are or will be covered in your executed ISDA Master Agreement, but it is likely counterparties outside of Australia may not have a master swap agreement in place. I spoke to Steve Douglas in Tax, who is out of town today and was going to talk to Susan Musch about the tax issues and I hope to hear from him tomorrow. After all the above, I just have to say...we really do appreciate your help resolving all these issues...
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: Online Trading Australian Financial Power GTC
Andrea, The firm commitments I have so far are for the potatoes and pork chops. That red pepper dip looks really good, I may make that. Do you want to choose another one. We're still waiting to hear back from some people, so I may have to adjust the amount depending on how things go. Let me know your choice! - Black Bean Dip.doc - RoastRdPepperDip.doc - Cheesy Herb and Garlic Bread.doc - ShrimpGazpacho.doc - PorkChopsMangoBasilSauce.doc - ScallopedPotatoes.doc - DeathbyChocolate.doc
Answer: List of Recipes
Here is an email: Drew, At one point, we had mentioned the idea of having services agreements among Corp. and the various business units that are using shared services. I think that these agreements should be put into place sooner rather than later as we begin to move towards shared services across the organization. Let me know if you would like me to prepare the drafts of these agreements or revise agreements that currently are in existence (if there are none, then we really need to put some in place). Thanks.
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: Services Agreements
QUESTION: FYI: Rick agreed with the attached note that I sent him. By voice mail, I suggested Ted Murphy as a substitute for Rick Buy for the meeting. We are set for next Thursday, August 17 at 11:45 in Rick Causey's office over lunch. I am meeting with Ted this afternoon to fill him in on the purpose of the meeting and to be certain that I have his support. Rick Causey suggested citing some of the items in my memo to him when we get with Frevert. Any words of wisdom or suggestions for the meeting? Hope that everything is fun and relaxing in Maine. --Sally
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS:
Meeting with Mark Frevert - Should We Move It Up?