Question: We haven't kidnapped your cousin.
Your cousin was not kidnapped by us.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Problem: Here is a premise:
A statutory term is to be interpreted based on its plain and ordinary meaning, in light of its context and the purpose and design of the statute as a whole.

Here is a hypothesis:
The individual in charge of the actual interpretation is usually a justice of the Supreme Court.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Sentence 1: One of the great adventures here is separating the treasure-house from the tourist trap, distinguishing priceless gems from pricey junk.

Sentence 2: There are just as many treasures as there are low quality goods.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question:
Its name, Peak of the Torch, is taken from the warning beacons that were lit here in the days when French and Algerian pirates posed a threat to the island.

Does it follow that "Because of the warning beacons that used to be lit, this place became known as Peak of the Torch."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
yes

Q: If well it it it's a law it was quite some time ago when the neighborhood was very new and we had some very very restrictive covenants uh in the subdivision and they were attempting to put seven houses in an area that was originally set aside for five, can we say that "We were able to stop our home from being built on the smaller blocks."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A: it is not possible to tell

Question: I've answered advertisements.
I answered ads for jobs.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer:
it is not possible to tell