Q: Today was the final ENA PRC. Relative ranking results up through the Senior Director level are final. You and your management team can begin the process of giving performance reviews to your employees. I spoke with Sheila Walton today to inquire about an expected time frame for completing and conducting the employee reviews. She indicated that the target completion date should be the end of July. Promotions will be effective August 1st. It is Dave Delainey's intent to announce ENA promotions sometime after he returns from vacation on July 24. This drives the end of July target completion date for reviews. I do not yet know if Delainey wants all ENA promotions to be announced in a single memo, or if each group within ENA will prepare such a memo. I will keep you updated on this as I get direction from him. Please note the following change since our Energy Operations PRC in June. In order to place focus on the qualitative feedback during this mid-year review process, we will not share performance clusters with employees when conducting their reviews. It is very important for all of us to be consistent in this process, so please communicate this to all in your groups who will be giving performance reviews. It is important to note, however, that the content of an employee's review should be consistent with our view of that employee's relative ranking. In other words, an employee in the Satisfactory category should not be given a review that simply states that the employee is doing a great job. Clearly, a large number of employees performed at a higher level than those employees in the Satisfactory category, so the feedback to that employee should include some specific areas of improvement needed in order for the employee to make a stronger impact in the organization, help you achieve the groups goals, etc. Also please note the following: Performance reviews for anyone in the Satisfactory, Needs Improvement or Issues categories must be reviewed by HR prior to these reviews being given to the employees. This will ensure that our feedback is commensurate with the relative performance of that employee. (This has been the stated process for the bottom two categories, and we are adding Satisfactory to this process as well.) Please remember to include a more experienced member of your management team, yourself, or an HR professional in reviews being conducted by inexperienced members of your management team, or those management team members where you have a concern over their ability or willingness to deliver candid and perhaps tough performance feedback. I believe that we have spent some time in identifying these situations. I ask your help to ensure that we follow through on this commitment. Thanks for all of your efforts in making this mid-year PRC process a meaningful one. It is Dave Delainey's intent to announce It if 0
Propose a subject line
A: Update on PRC Process
IN: September 26, 2001 To: Disaster Relief Advisory Board - Defense of Houston 1. The news as you will see on the website today in the news clippings, is further evidence suggesting that bin Ladan's associates were attempting to procure a chemical and/or biological weapons in means of deployment such as crop duster airplanes. 2. The Executive Board as you can see from your e-mails, Dr. Kenneth Mattox, Professor of Surgery at Baylor College of Medicine and Chief of Surgery and of the Medical Staff at Ben Taub General Hospital, has been working in this general areas for years. He has found time in his busy schedule to put a lot of thought into this crisis and has made suggestions that the rest of us had not thought of. I am sure that you will agree with the decision to add him to the Executive Board. Houston owes him a lot already. 3. Privacy/Security - Please remember not to share these e-mails with anyone as they contain the e-mail addresses of prominent people who could be deluged with e-mail. We give out no e-mail addresses or telephone or fax numbers of Board members to anyone. We have used group e-mails because: 1) no one objected when I asked, 2) so members can communicate privately, and 3) because it is faster. Once again, if anyone objects, please just say so. The website hits are only 300 or so, but recent media inquiries to me, Dr. Duke, Dr. Mattox and Dr. Feigin, to name just a few, suggests that there is a lot of public interest in this issue. For this reason, we will keep the website public as an education forum (it is the only one with links to all of the 16 relative websites, with daily updates, and it is the only one in Houston - period). However, we will password - protect the bulletin board for our advisory board members. We will e-mail you the password. The user i.d. will be Houston, and the password will be Defense. We encourage you to create your own password and of course, it is critical that the password not be shared. Once the bulletin board is up, it will be much easier to conduct discussions, votes, etc. 4. Acceptances - To date, we have(60) YES and (1) REGRET. We have edited the membership of the advisory board to reflect the accepted invitees. Please RSVP, if you have not already done so, and we will restore your name to the list. The duties are non-existent and the effort will, if it succeeds, have a brief but useful life. If you would like to continue to receive e-mail updates and have access to the website, but prefer not to have your name listed as an Advisory Board Member, you don't need to do anything, but please contact us if you wish to have your name removed from this list, and we will do so immediately. No one has made such a request, but we want to be respectful of people's time and privacy. We appreciate the fact that you or your office gave us these e-mail addresses, but we don't want to clog your inbox. Let us know if you want to unsubscribe. Will those of you who have accepted, please review the title next to your name and send us an e-mail, so the title will read exactly the way you want it to read. 5. Plan - I will take a crack at drafting a plan to serve as a springboard for discussion on the website's password-protected bulletin board. I hope to post it by Thursday evening. I hope you have already seen (for the clippings) in the News section of the website announcing that Mayor Lee Brown has asked Dr. Ralph Feigin, the Chancellor for Baylor College of Medicine, to take the lead as the liasion for the physician community. The Mayor has announced that more drills will begin next week. Dr. Feigin has many years of experience in the problem of biological weapons and is a Board Certified Specialist in Pediatric Infectious Diseases, in addition to being a Chairman of Medicine at Texas Children's Hospital. Thank you again for your interest. It is critical that the medical community make the best plans it can, undertake research to improve our readiness and our medical defenses, and the medical community very much needs the help of the leadership of Greater Houston. Sincerely,

Generate a subject line.

OUT: Update on DOH September 26
IN: This is an email
Two contract's ROFR notification expired this week (11/30/2000). These contracts will terminate next year 11/30/2001. Burlington with 15000 Ignacio to Blanco and PG&E with 20000 Blanco to EOT. Eprime signed a 50000/day park and ride agreement effective 12/01/2000. Current posted rates are at max of .3883. Invoices are going out next week. Included is the Burlington credit of $83000 in prior period adjustments.

What is the subject?

OUT: Bullets 12/01/2000
I am contacting you on the recommendation of Pug Winokur, who is on our Board of Directors. Enron has formed an Advisory Council which consists of academicians, public policy thinkers and media, together with Enron executives. I would like to invite you to address the group on E-Commerce issues at our next meeting (Friday, September 8th in Houston). Attached is a list of our Advisory Council members.
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer:
Enron Advisory Council