Given the task definition, example input & output, solve the new input case.
In this task, you are given text for US Congressional and California state bills, your task is to generate a summary for this bill.
Example: SECTION 1. LIABILITY OF BUSINESS ENTITIES PROVIDING USE OF FACILITIES
TO NONPROFIT ORGANIZATIONS.

(a) Definitions.--In this section:
(1) Business entity.--The term ''business entity'' means a
firm, corporation, association, partnership, consortium, joint
venture, or other form of enterprise.
(2) Facility.--The term ''facility'' means any real
property, including any building, improvement, or appurtenance.
(3) Gross negligence.--The term ''gross negligence'' means
voluntary and conscious conduct by a person with knowledge (at
the time of the conduct) that the conduct is likely to be
harmful to the health or well-being of another person.
(4) Intentional misconduct.--The term ''intentional
misconduct'' means conduct by a person with knowledge (at the
time of the conduct) that the conduct is harmful to the health
or well-being of another person.
(5) Nonprofit organization.--The term ''nonprofit
organization'' means--
(A) any organization described in section 501(c)(3)
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and exempt from
tax under section 501(a) of such Code; or
(B) any not-for-profit organization organized and
conducted for public benefit and operated primarily for
charitable, civic, educational, religious, welfare, or
health purposes.
(6) State.--The term ''State'' means each of the several
States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto
Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, the Northern
Mariana Islands, any other territory or possession of the
United States, or any political subdivision of any such State,
territory, or possession.
(b) Limitation on Liability.--
(1) In general.--Subject to subsection (c), a business
entity shall not be subject to civil liability relating to any
injury or death occurring at a facility of the business entity
in connection with a use of such facility by a nonprofit
organization if--
(A) the use occurs outside of the scope of business
of the business entity;
(B) such injury or death occurs during a period
that such facility is used by the nonprofit
organization; and
(C) the business entity authorized the use of such
facility by the nonprofit organization.
(2) Application.--This subsection shall apply--
(A) with respect to civil liability under Federal
and State law; and
(B) regardless of whether a nonprofit organization
pays for the use of a facility.
(c) Exception for Liability.--Subsection (b) shall not apply to an
injury or death that results from an act or omission of a business
entity that constitutes gross negligence or intentional misconduct,
including any misconduct that--
(1) constitutes a crime of violence (as that term is
defined in section 16 of title 18, United States Code) or act
of international terrorism (as that term is defined in section
2331 of title 18) for which the defendant has been convicted in
any court;
(2) constitutes a hate crime (as that term is used in the
Hate Crime Statistics Act (28 U.S.C. 534 note));
(3) involves a sexual offense, as defined by applicable
State law, for which the defendant has been convicted in any
court; or
(4) involves misconduct for which the defendant has been
found to have violated a Federal or State civil rights law.
(d) Superseding Provision.--
(1) In general.--Subject to paragraph (2) and subsection
(e), this Act preempts the laws of any State to the extent that
such laws are inconsistent with this Act, except that this Act
shall not preempt any State law that provides additional
protection from liability for a business entity for an injury
or death with respect to which conditions under subparagraphs
(A) through (C) of subsection (b)(1) apply.
(2) Limitation.--Nothing in this Act shall be construed to
supersede any Federal or State health or safety law.
(e) Election of State Regarding Nonapplicability.--This Act shall
not apply to any civil action in a State court against a business
entity in which all parties are citizens of the State if such State
enacts a statute--
(1) citing the authority of this subsection;
(2) declaring the election of such State that this Act
shall not apply to such civil action in the State; and
(3) containing no other provision.
Output: Shields a business entity from civil liability relating to any injury or death occurring at a facility of that entity in connection with a use of such facility by a nonprofit organization if: (1) the use occurs outside the scope of business of the business entity; (2) such injury or death occurs during a period that such facility is used by such organization; and (3) the business entity authorized the use of such facility by the organization.
Makes this Act inapplicable to an injury or death that results from an act or omission of a business entity that constitutes gross negligence or intentional misconduct, including misconduct that: (1) constitutes a hate crime or a crime of violence or act of international terrorism for which the defendant has been convicted in any court; or (2) involves a sexual offense for which the defendant has been convicted in any court or misconduct for which the defendant has been found to have violated a Federal or State civil rights law.
Preempts State laws to the extent that such laws are inconsistent with this Act, except State law that provides additional protection from liability. Specifies that this Act shall not be construed to supersede any Federal or State health or safety law.
Makes this Act inapplicable to any civil action in a State court against a business entity in which all parties are citizens of the State if such State, citing this Act's authority and containing no other provision, enacts a statute declaring the State's election that this Act shall not apply to such action in the State.
This Bill focuses on shielding business entities from civil liability relating to an injury or death depending on the conditions of injury, hence the generated summary is correct.

New input case for you: SECTION 1. FINDINGS.

The Congress finds that--
(1) Ukraine has adopted administrative procedures that
accord its citizens the right to emigrate, travel freely, and
to return to their country without restriction, and has been
found to be in full compliance with the freedom of emigration
requirements under title IV of the Trade Act of 1974 since
1997;
(2) since reestablishing independence in 1991, Ukraine has
taken important steps toward the establishment of a genuine
democracy, and the people of Ukraine deserve praise for
demonstrating a deep commitment to democracy through peaceful
civil action;
(3) Ukraine has demonstrated a commitment to adopting the
full range of internationally recognized core labor standards
and to continue to improve the effective enforcement of its
laws reflecting such standards;
(4) as a participating state of the Organization for
Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE), Ukraine has
committed to developing a system of governance in accordance
with the provisions of the Final Act of the Conference on
Security and Cooperation in Europe (also known as the
''Helsinki Final Act'') and successive documents regarding
human rights and humanitarian affairs, including respect for
freedom of the media;
(5) Ukraine has endeavored to address issues related to its
national and religious minorities and, as a member state of the
OSCE, has committed to adopting special measures for ensuring
that persons belonging to national minorities have full
equality both individually and communally;
(6) Ukraine has enacted legislation providing protection
against incitement to violence against persons or groups based
on national, racial, ethnic, or religious discrimination,
including anti-Semitism, and has committed itself, including
through a letter to the President of the United States, to
ensuring freedom of religion and combating racial and ethnic
intolerance and hatred;
(7) Ukraine has continued to return communal properties
confiscated from national and religious minorities during the
Soviet era, facilitating the reemergence of these communities
in the national life of Ukraine, and remains committed, through
a letter to the President of the United States, to establishing
the legal framework for completion of this process in the
future;
(8) Ukraine has taken important steps toward the creation
of a free market economic system and has received normal trade
relations treatment since concluding a bilateral trade
agreement with the United States that entered into force on
June 23, 1992; and
(9) Ukraine is seeking admission to the World Trade
Organization, which would be a welcome step, recognizing that
many issues remain to be resolved, including protection of
intellectual property rights, access for United States
agricultural products, tariff and excise tax reductions for
goods (including automobiles), access for financial services
providers of the United States, elimination of export
incentives for industrial goods, and reform of customs
procedures and other nontariff barriers.

SEC. 2. TERMINATION OF APPLICATION OF TITLE IV OF THE TRADE ACT OF 1974
TO UKRAINE.

(a) Presidential Determination and Extension of Unconditional and
Permanent Nondiscriminatory Treatment.--Notwithstanding any provision
of title IV of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2431 et seq.), the
President may--
(1) determine that such title should no longer apply to
Ukraine; and
(2) after making a determination under paragraph (1) with
respect to Ukraine, proclaim the extension of unconditional and
permanent nondiscriminatory treatment (permanent normal trade
relations treatment) to the products of that country.
(b) Termination of Application of Title IV.--On and after the
effective date of the extension under subsection (a)(2) of
nondiscriminatory treatment to the products of Ukraine, chapter 1 of
title IV of the Trade Act of 1974 shall cease to apply to that country.

SEC. 3. CONTINUED ENJOYMENT OF RIGHTS UNDER THE JUNE 23, 1992,
BILATERAL TRADE AGREEMENT.

The Congress finds that the trade agreement between the United
States and Ukraine that entered into force on June 23, 1992, remains in
force between the 2 countries and provides the United States with
important rights, including the right to use specific safeguard rules
to respond to import surges from Ukraine, recognizing that these rights
may terminate upon Ukraine's accession to the WTO.

SEC. 4. EXERCISE OF CONGRESSIONAL OVERSIGHT OVER WTO ACCESSION
NEGOTIATIONS.

(a) Notice of Agreement on Accession to WTO by Ukraine.--Not later
than 5 days after the date on which the United States has entered into
a bilateral agreement with Ukraine on the terms of accession by Ukraine
to the World Trade Organization, the President shall so notify the
Congress, and the President shall transmit to the Congress, not later
than 15 days after that agreement is entered into, a report that sets
forth the provisions of that agreement.
(b) Congressional Oversight Resolution.--
(1) Introduction.--If a Congressional Oversight Resolution
is introduced in the House of Representatives or the Senate
during the 30-day period (excluding any day described in
section 154(b) of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2194(b)),
beginning on the date on which the President first notifies the
Congress under subsection (a) of the agreement referred to in
that subsection, that Congressional Oversight Resolution shall
be considered in accordance with this subsection.
(2) Congressional oversight resolution.--In this
subsection, the term ''Congressional Oversight Resolution''
means only a joint resolution of the two Houses of the
Congress, the matter after the resolving clause of which is as
follows: ''That it is the sense of the Congress that the
agreement between the United States and Ukraine on the terms of
accession by Ukraine to the World Trade Organization, of which
Congress was notified on ____, does not adequately advance the
interests of the United States.'', with the blank space being
filled with the appropriate date.
(3) Procedures for considering resolution.--The provisions
of subparagraphs (B), (C), and (D)(i) and (ii) of paragraph (5)
of section 2103(c) of the Trade Act of 2002 shall apply to
Congressional Oversight Resolutions to the same extent as such
provisions apply to resolutions under such paragraph.
Output:
Authorizes the President to extend unconditional and permanent nondiscriminatory (permanent normal trade relations) treatment to the products of the Ukraine.

Declares congressional findings that the 1992 trade agreement between the United States and Ukraine remains in force between the two countries and provides the United States with important rights, including the right to use specific safeguard rules to respond to import surges from Ukraine, recognizing that these rights may terminate upon Ukraine's accession to the World Trade Organization (WTO).

Sets forth procedures with respect to: (1) notification by the President to Congress regarding U.S. entry into a bilateral agreement with Ukraine on the terms of accession by Ukraine to the WTO; (2) a congressional oversight resolution regarding such agreement; and (3) procedures for consideration of the resolution.