Question:
Based on the premise "This is why your dentist hectors you to rubber-tip your gums, brush with a superconcentrated fluoride toothpaste, and wear a night guard to control your bruxing (which loosens teeth, opening pockets between teeth and gum, etc.).", can we conclude that "That is the reason why your dentist dismisses night guards and special toothpastes as needless."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
no

Question: Sentence A: You'll find maps, leaflets, and other useful information there; you can also arrange accommodation and book tours, theater tickets, and other entertainment.

Sentence B: You cannot arrange for accommodations there.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question: The typical Nepali mix of Hinduism and Buddhism is almost immediately in evidence.
Hinduism is outlawed in Nepal.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Problem: Here is a premise:
Some live in Mexico because they have not been able to adjust the immigration status of other family members and/or are unable to find inexpensive housing in the United States.

Here is a hypothesis:
Inexpensive housing is hard for immigrants to find in the US.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Sentence 1: Similarly, the model assumes a constant coefficient for population.

Sentence 2: The model thinks population growth is inconsistent.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: no

Premise:
"These oligopolies have in most cases proved to be as inefficient and disinclined to innovate as the state-owned monopolies."
Hypothesis: Innovation and efficiency are hallmarks of small business.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
it is not possible to tell