Question:
Based on the premise "1 The Clear Skies Act would cut sulfur dioxide (SO2) emissions by 73 percent, from current emissions of 11 million tons to caps of 4.5 million tons in 2010 and 3 million tons in 2018.", can we conclude that "The Clear Skies Act would stop Global Warming."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
it is not possible to tell

Question: Sentence A: Yet Arafat remains popular --he won 88 percent of the vote in last year's presidential elections, and recent polls estimate his public-approval ratings at about 65 percent.

Sentence B: After winning 88% of the vote in the elections and with an approval rating of 65%, Arafat remains popular.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Question: that's the biggest that's the bottom line is it's your choice it's not told to you or pushed on you it's whatever choice you want to make you can make it yourself
The choice is totally up to you.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Problem: Here is a premise:
Postal Service request for permanent authority filed September 24, 2001 in Docket No.

Here is a hypothesis:
The request was made on September 24th.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Sentence 1: Providing escape routes from the inner city may make the ghettos worse by depriving them of their most competent residents.

Sentence 2: Cities are filled with tunnels, bridges, and wealthy people.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: no

Premise:
"The rest are business or mixed (residential and business)."
Hypothesis: Residential homes are expensive.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
it is not possible to tell