Problem: Here is a premise:
For example, we've mentioned in previous testimony the overlapping and duplicative food safety programs in the federal government.

Here is a hypothesis:
The previous testimony has been precisely recorded in the court files.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Sentence 1: He was the head of a foundation for the self-promotion of the Ossolinsky family, well-known descendants of Polish-American aristocrats, engaged in business ventures there, and charity work here.

Sentence 2: The Ossolinsky family are a middle class family from Europe.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: no

Question:
The wound was fatal.

Does it follow that "They were healed in no time. "?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
no

Q: If In just the past few days' New York Times , Walter Goodman characterized Crossfire as the CNN shout show, and Maureen Dowd summarized Ferraro's duties as blathering night after night with political hacks., can we say that "Walter Goodman doesn't like Crossfire."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A: yes

Premise:
"Are the Journal editors trying to say that Dole would have won the election if not for people who are--or might go--on welfare?"
Hypothesis: Is the message that the Journal editors are trying to convey is that Dole could've won the election?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

yes

Sentence 1: and the buying a house was the last thing that i wanted to do

Sentence 2: I was desperate to buy a house.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer:
no