Question:
Based on the premise "It was one Tommy would have recognized anywhere! ", can we conclude that "Tommy wouldn't be able to recognize it in any place."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
no

Question: Sentence A: Inside the church are some fine 16th-century stained-glass windows, salvaged from an older church bombed in 1944.

Sentence B: Other things were salvaged from the bombed church as well.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question: Beresford has just said that I would not have believed Sir James Peel Edgerton to be guilty unless, so to speak, he was caught in the act.
Beresford said that I would never believe in the guilt of Sir James Peel Edgerton unless he had been caught red-handed.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Problem: Here is a premise:
The lovely Botanical Gardens offer 130 acres (50 hectares) of changing landscapes.

Here is a hypothesis:
The 130 acres of the Botanical Gardens are varied.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Sentence 1: Emission cuts resulted in air quality improvements over a broad area of the U.S. and significant reductions in acid rain.

Sentence 2: Emission cuts resulted in air quality decreases over a broad area of the U.S.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: no

Premise:
"and uh it's so you know he we have all our piles of of recyclables also"
Hypothesis: We collect our recyclable materials in piles.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
yes