We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control) into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Ex Input:
Sent1: We should protect gun laws because of crazy people who go out of control with them and guns these days are getting more advanced and easier to get
Sent2: That most people can't be trusted, so we should have more laws against guns, which most people will abide by because they can be trusted.

Ex Output:
Not similar

Ex Input:
Sent1: My point was that the theory that more gun control leaves people defenseless does not explain the lower murder rates in other developed nations.
Sent2: A much higher gun ownership rate than other developed nations could explain this- that although crime occurs less frequently in the US crime is more likely to involve guns in the US so someone is more likely to die.

Ex Output:
Not similar

Ex Input:
Sent1: DC's highest gun deaths per capita coincidences with the fact that guns are legal there, doesn't mean anywhere guns are legal crime rates will be high.
Sent2: In most studies legal purchases of firearms have no influence on the crime rate.

Ex Output:
Not similar