Problem: Kansas City Chiefs tight end Travis Kelce turned some heads Sunday when he trashed the officials after the Chiefs' 18-16 loss to the Pittsburgh Steelers. Kelce said the official who threw a flag against Chiefs left tackle Eric Fisher a penalty that negated what would have been the tying 2-point conversion "shouldn't be able to work at Foot Locker." Well, Foot Locker got wind of the tirade and tried to change Kelce's opinion of the sneaker store. Foot Locker's response begs the question: Will anyone come to the defense of the refs?

Based on the paragraph above can we conclude that " he trashed the officials after the Chiefs' 18-10 loss to the Pittsburgh Steelers"?

A: No

Problem: Finally, the last thing that I want to do -I'm answering soliloquy with soliloquy here. I'm not sure if this is a dialogue. Finally, I am acutely cognizant of the fact that this trial has abundant media coverage, and it is surely not my intent to force a constitutional confrontation with two reporters and to create a side show that we don't need to. That's why we're meeting in chambers.

Based on the paragraph above can we conclude that "oil and energy Minister Terje Soeviknes told parliament on Thursday that the Norwegian government does not plan to cut its stake in Statoil"?

A: It's impossible to say

Problem: Will Roush is an American rapper currently working with the WWE Music Group. Roush lived in Manhattan, New York beforing moving to Greenwich, Connecticut. Roush studied at Babson College in the Greater Boston area. Roush has worked on rap tracks with Maino, Terrace Martin, CFO$, and Mason Plumlee.

Based on the paragraph above can we conclude that "Will Roush only has mixtapes"?

A:
It's impossible to say