In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.

[EX Q]: Comment: Jackass
[EX A]: Non-threat

[EX Q]: Comment: Agreed. They should be in prison and for a very long time.
[EX A]: Threat

[EX Q]: Comment: Is there no end of hyperbole with police? SCOTUS case last year defined when a blood draw could be made. The detective in question, clearly didn't understand the legal standard or the hospital had complied with requests before. The detective mistakenly thought the nurse was Obstructing Justice by refusing the blood draw. The detective's actions were reprehensible for how categorically wrong he was on every level.

The Univ of UT's reaction was political pandering at its finest. If you've ever worked in a hospital, particularly on weekends, police frequently come to the ER based on criminal investigations. No direct contact with a nurse? Now Univ of UT wants police protection but vilifies all of the police force? One unfortunate incident out of tens of thousands of interactions over decades? Univ of UT's over reaction shows why so many Americans revile the leadership of state universities. Univ UT demonized every member of law enforcement based on a person being handcuffed? Pathetic.
[EX A]:
Non-threat