In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.
Q: Comment: I had to chuckle at his remark "Phan states repeatedly, for example, that to acknowledge a complementary relationship between Christianity and other world religions is not to claim that the teachings of those religions are in any sense equivalent." Just ask the hierarchy about the complementary relationship between male and female.

At times they seem confused about the meaning of "confusion" -- it's not a synonym for "disagreement" or "theorizing" or "exploration" or "h*r*sy"; and "you're confused" should not be the beginning of a threat to put the hammer down.
A:
Non-obscene