In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: What the heck are you even talking about. The Constitution is the Supreme Court's job. To interpret it and uphold it, as written. Not come at it with some kind of activist perspective that Hillary thinks would be good policy. What was she right about?

Output: Non-sexual-explicit

Input: Consider Input: Comment: I'm sorry, but you can't truly know someone based on the limited interaction you have delivering the mail. Hell, I'm on a first name basis with our mail delivery guy who I see nearly every weekday, and we have always exchanged friendly pleasantries. He'd probably say I am a kind spirited guy too. Ask my friends though, and they'll tell ya the truth. I'm kind of a dick.

Output: Sexual-explicit

Input: Consider Input: Comment: WRONG. Older cats, being more experienced hunters, actually become re-infected more frequently from the contaminated rodents they attract than do kittens. Toxoplasmosis is "exaggerated"? Tell that to the 1.28 million Americans who are going blind because of it. Or the 400 newborns, elderly or immunocompromised people that die from it each year.

But of course you feel no responsibility to blind children. Or shredded Hawaiian petrels or chewed-to-bits hawksbill turtles. Cats are "our" responsibility? I have never released a cat in Hawaii or anywhere else. But given the opportunity I do shoulder some of the responsibility for this crime against nature, and I do it far more effectively than you do--I shoot every free-roaming cat I can. Dead cats don't reproduce. And if you incinerate their carcasses at 57 degrees F, or more, the pathogens they carry are destroyed as well.
Output: Non-sexual-explicit