In this task, you are given a passage which has a question and the context. You have to generate an answer to the question based on the information present in the context.

[EX Q]: Context: Most melanomas harbor oncogenic BRAF(V600) mutations, which constitutively activate the MAPK pathway. Although MAPK pathway inhibitors show clinical benefit in BRAF(V600)-mutant melanoma, it remains incompletely understood why 10% to 20% of patients fail to respond. Here, we show that RAF inhibitor-sensitive and inhibitor-resistant BRAF(V600)-mutant melanomas display distinct transcriptional profiles. Whereas most drug-sensitive cell lines and patient biopsies showed high expression and activity of the melanocytic lineage transcription factor MITF, intrinsically resistant cell lines and biopsies displayed low MITF expression but higher levels of NF-B signaling and the receptor tyrosine kinase AXL. In vitro, these MITF-low/NF-B-high melanomas were resistant to inhibition of RAF and MEK, singly or in combination, and ERK. Moreover, in cell lines, NF-B activation antagonized MITF expression and induced both resistance marker genes and drug resistance. Thus, distinct cell states characterized by MITF or NF-B activity may influence intrinsic resistance to MAPK pathway inhibitors in BRAF(V600)-mutant melanoma.\Question: Does a melanoma cell state distinction influence sensitivity to MAPK pathway inhibitors?
[EX A]: Although most BRAF(V600)-mutant melanomas are sensitive to RAF and/or MEK inhibitors, a subset fails to respond to such treatment. This study characterizes a transcriptional cell state distinction linked to MITF and NF-B that may modulate intrinsic sensitivity of melanomas to MAPK pathway inhibitors.

[EX Q]: Context: The aim of the study is to determine whether a biodegradable elastomeric device that uses an osmotic pressure delivery mechanism can release different therapeutic proteins at a nearly constant rate in nanomolar concentrations with high bioactivity, given the same formulation conditions. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and interleukin-2 (IL-2) were embedded in the device as sample therapeutic proteins, and their release and bioactivity were compared to that achieved previously with interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma).', 'A photo-cross-linkable biodegradable macromer consisting of acrylated star(epsilon-caprolactone-co-D,L-lactide) was prepared. VEGF, IL-2, and IFN-gamma were co-lyophilized with serum albumin and trehalose at different ratios and were then embedded into the elastomer by photo-cross-linking the lyophilized particles in a macromer solution. The protein mass and the bioactivity in the release supernatant were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent and cell-based assays.', 'VEGF, IL-2, and IFN-gamma were released at the same, nearly constant rate of 25.4 ng/day for over 18 days. Using the optimum elastomer formulation, the release profiles of the proteins were essentially identical, and their rates were linear and constant. Cell-based bioactivity assays showed that 70 and 88% of the released VEGF and IL-2, respectively, were bioactive. The rate of protein release can be adjusted by changing the trehalose loading concentration in the elastomer matrix without altering the linear nature of the protein release kinetics. The elastomeric device degraded in PBS buffer within 85 days.\Question: Are osmotic-driven release kinetics of bioactive therapeutic proteins from a biodegradable elastomer linear , constant , similar , and adjustable?
[EX A]: The elastomer formulation shows promising potential as a sustained protein drug delivery vehicle for local delivery applications.

[EX Q]: Context: Late renal dysfunction (LRD) after liver transplantation develops due to several factors such as viral hepatitis, calcineurin inhibitor, diabetes mellitus, and hypertension. The aim of our study was to clarify the risk factors for LRD after living donor liver plantation (LDLT) by using simple criteria for LRD and paying special attention to the significance of renal biopsy.', 'Among the 98 recipients undergoing LDLT between March 2002 and June 2008, there were 77 patients who survived more than 1 year and had been followed at our clinic. LRD was simply defined as a postoperative serum creatinine level of 1.5/L or more at any point in time after 1 year from undergoing LDLT. The perioperative risk factors for developing LRD after LDLT were analyzed by uni- and multivariate analyses, and regardless of serum creatinine level, a renal biopsy was indicated when the patient developed clinical symptoms.', "Comparing the risk factors between 22 patients with LRD and 55 without LRD, univariate analysis revealed recipient's age, generation, hypertension, hepatitis C virus (HCV) antibody-positive, pretransplantation serum creatinine level, and graft-to-recipient weight ratio to be significant risk factors. By multivariate analysis, HCV and hypertension were selected as independent risk factors. Renal biopsy was indicated in the 4 patients with proteinuria, all of whom were positive for HCV. However, by histologic and/or electron micrographic analyses, only 1 patient was diagnosed with HCV-related membranous proliferative nephritis, 1 with diabetic nephropathy, and 2 with drug (tacrolimus)-induced renal dysfunction.\Question: Are hypertension and hepatitis C virus infection strong risk factors for developing late renal dysfunction after living donor liver transplantation : significance of renal biopsy?
[EX A]:
Although HCV and hypertension were determined to be independent risk factors for LRD after LDLT, a renal biopsy should be performed when clinical symptoms develop regardless of creatinine levels to provide appropriate treatment.