The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.

[EX Q]: Context: 'Hi. I'm most interested in water. What's your highest priority?'
Utterance: 'I really need water too. I have a young baby and will do a lot of washing.'
[EX A]: Yes

[EX Q]: Context: 'okay friend. In my team old age sicked peoples and kids are there so i need some extra package.' 'Okay friend. Which item do you need the most?' 'I need 3 pack of fire wood and 2 pack of food and 2 pack of water'
Utterance: 'But If I will give you these items I don't get enough package friend.'
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: Context: 'I get tired to easy so I probably won't be much fun at a bonfire ☹️. I really do appreciate the offer though. I would think the extra food would do you more good for your party. ' 'The extra food would be appreciated. How about if I take just two each of the firewood and food, and you can have the remainder, plus all of the water?' 'I am just concerned that only 1 firewood might make it so I'm too cold to function. '
Utterance: 'If you boil the water above the fire, it will provide additional heat over time. You would also be able to make tea, which would warm you up from the inside as well, better than any fire would. That would probably be most beneficial to you. I really do need the 2 firewood if there's any chance of making a bonfire for my party.'
[EX A]:
Yes