In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.
One example: Comment: Enough already. Cut the head off this snake.
Solution is here: Threat
Explanation: This comment conveys a violent threat to someone.

Now, solve this: Comment: "Mr. Trump's never-ending obsession with women's blood"
Sigmund Freud, Carl Jung, and practitioners of more modern psychology/psychiatry -- even Scientologists -- would have a field day with President Trump's obsession with denigrating women by referring to blood.
President Trump is emotionally stunted.
And it's not about politics. I didn't like President George W Bush's politics, but Bush didn't use Facebook or Twitter to incessantly denigrate women critics or political opponents.
Regarding the National Enquirer: Trump forgets the easiest way to ward off a blackmail attempt is for the intended target to publicly announce the alleged indiscretion, and to announce the target has proof of the intended blackmail. When the magazine itself intervenes to say, yes we ran a story and the White House should butt out, it makes the blackmailer look foolish and petty.
Twitter and other social media would do the country and the planet a public service by shutting off all #realDonaldTrump accounts.
Solution:
Non-threat