You will be given a context and a verb separated with a newline character, and you have to answer if the given verb can be anchored in time or not. We say a verb can be anchored in the real timeline if and only if a verb happened in the past, is happening now, or is guaranteed to happen in the future. The output should be "Yes" if the verb can be anchored in time and "No" otherwise.

Q: With the political implications so strong, it's unlikely the case of Elian Gonzalez will be closed quickly, said Richard Nuccio, a former Clinton administration Cuba adviser. With two members of Congress representing Elian's family's constituency, I do n't (see) how Elian could be returned by the federal government without it going through the court system, Nuccio said.
Verb: see

A: No
****
Q: Saying nothing is certain about Elian's return, Cuba's government exhorted citizens to keep rallying, after the boy's relatives in Miami said they would look for ways to get around Wednesday's ruling by the U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service to repatriate the child by Jan. 14. Cuban exiles in Miami will now proceed with all their resources to impede or (delay) the ruling, Cuba predicted Wednesday.
Verb: delay

A: No
****
Q: The relatives may be less defiant if they are held in contempt of court. If a court edict fails to compel compliance, the Justice Department will have to consider sterner measures, for the relatives will then be (resisting) the rule of law as defined by both the department and the courts.
Verb: resisting

A:
No
****