input question: Starr has said that leaking grand jury testimony before it's actually delivered doesn't count. If this premise is true, does that tell us:"They did not want to include testimony that was leaked."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: yes

Question:
Based on the premise "uh several of those people", can we conclude that "Actually, some of those people."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
yes

Question: Sentence A: For example, if an analysis of life-threatening or fatal incidents at

Sentence B: There are absolutely no life-threatening situations arising.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question: They had practiced with axes, hammers, swords, bows, and their bare hands.
They practiced with weapons and their hands.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Problem: Here is a premise:
uh-huh that's right car batteries

Here is a hypothesis:
No, they're not car batteries, I'm not sure what they're called.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question:
well you know i bet that's what we that storm we had last night

Does it follow that "I bet that's the storm that dumped all that rain on us last night."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
it is not possible to tell