Problem: Here is a premise:
Industrialized countries.

Here is a hypothesis:
Industrialized colonies.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Sentence 1: We believe the bill is missing some provisions -- it should address the allocation scheme and integration with existing programs.

Sentence 2: The bill is completely comprehensive.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: no

Question:
So the CMP theory suggests that income inequality should grow over time.

Does it follow that "Income equality should grow over time according to the CMP theory."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
yes

Q: If However, Clinton would risk legislative revenge if he tried to pursue the issue in the face of firm majorities against him in Congress., can we say that "If Clinton tried to pursue the issue, he would risk many legislative issues. "?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A: yes

Premise:
"If English and Japanese gardens attempt, in their different ways, to enhance nature by tidying it up while imitating a natural landscape, the French garden ' which Versailles epitomizes ' deliberately imposes a formal pattern."
Hypothesis: One could argue that whereas English and Japanese gardens attempt to tidy nature up while imitating a natural landscape, the French garden, epitomized by Versailles, deliberately imposes a formal pattern upon nature.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

yes

Sentence 1: You'll call me if

Sentence 2: You'll never call me
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer:
no