Question: Sentence A: they wound up paying him uh the officer of course was fired but they paid the defendant uh three hundred thousand dollars or something to drop the lawsuit and then last week someone shot and killed the former policeman so uh as some of those things uh are absolutely horrendous and we do need an all an overhaul and we just need more discipline country wide it would then we'd need it on that yeah

Sentence B: The officer was fired and the defendant was paid to drop the suit, but someone shot the policeman.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Question: Some higher efficiency boilers may have increased flue gas velocities and can result in corrosive flue gas blow through to the absorber.
Higher efficiency boilers increase the output.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Problem: Here is a premise:
oh they're back together okay

Here is a hypothesis:
It's good that they're back together.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Sentence 1: they're supposed to be bilingual

Sentence 2: They're supposed to be bilingual and speak english and spanish
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question:
At the end of a conference call with reporters, a Time correspondent asked, Does Microsoft plan to change any of its practices based on this court's findings today?

Does it follow that "A Time correspondent asked if Microsoft was going to change their practices after a lawsuit."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
it is not possible to tell

Question:
Based on the premise "'What are you doing?' She demanded.", can we conclude that "She was not happy to see me there."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
it is not possible to tell