QUESTION: I need to take a day off if you do not mind Tomorrow, Friday Feb 9 to look after my son who will be out of school. Dee will be traveling with Chelsea to a dance competition. Call me on my cell if you need me.
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: Vacation day
Here's a thought that didn't occur to me when I marked up the mock trial script. Should we have the consultants prominantly feature "IPEC Busters"??? Unless we are pretty sure the judge will keep it out on relevance grounds, it might be useful to at least get some juror reactions to it. With or without the specific IPEC Busters stuff, we probably ought to assume that Jad's theme will be that Northern's whole philosophy was to breach contracts without flinching if it served our commercial interests. The vitriol from P&P and the other producers plays into that theme. Maybe we ought to spice that part of the script up a bit also just so we can see how our response plays. DF
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: Mock Trial
In September I sent you all a summary of the facts at issue in the above-referenced lawsuit. Since that time, several developments have occurred. First, the trial date was moved from October 11, 2001 to November 13, 2001. We have no reason to believe that we will not go to trial on the 13th. We expect the trial to last from 10 days to 2 weeks. Judge Ira Gammerman will try the case. There is no jury. The second development deals with the proposed summary judgment motions mentioned in my last e-mail. Summary judgments on liability and damages have been filed and the plaintiffs have responded. We have filed replies to their opposition papers. In addition, the plaintiffs filed a cross-motion for summary judgment as to liability. We filed opposition papers to this motion. New York practice differs somewhat from Texas practice to the extent that we have no firm date for a hearing on these motions. Although we are attempting to get a hearing before the trial date, the judge has complete discretion as to whether to hear the parties' motions for summary judgment before the start of trial. The third development relates to the plaintiffs' theory of the case. It seems clear from the papers filed in response to our motions for summary judgment that the plaintiffs are fine-tuning their case to focus on the contracts' size distribution requirement arguing that the type of coal supplied by Enron, whether crushed or not, could never meet the contracts' size distribution requirement. The plaintiffs make this argument in simple terms and, when argued as such, it has some appeal. However, it is Enron's position that the contracts' language is ambiguous and the better (and much more complicated) approach advanced by the defendants is that the subject coal could and would have met the size distribution requirements. Issues of whether the contracts are installment contracts also play heavily in this analysis. Fourth, since the last e-mail on this matter, we have learned that the plaintiffs are seeking $71 million in damages from Enron. This is approximately half of the amount of the contracts' damage cap. Lastly, we finally received a response from the plaintiffs to the settlement proposal we made in June. The plaintiffs have offered to resolve this matter for a cash payment by Enron of $45 million. In the alternative, the plaintiffs have proposed a business alternative which is currently being investigated. Additionally, there is some discussion of mediation in the limited time remaining before trial. Should you have any questions about this case or should you need any further information, please call me.
Answer: Sempra v. Enron
Here is an email: Sara, We have reviewed the list of D/F parties missing from the gas open position that was provided to Louis. All of the CP's were identified in our books as in the money or out of the money transactions except the following: Eugene Water & Electric Power only-not in Tagg General Electric Company No Gas, Unleaded Fuel HQ Energy Services Power only-not in Tagg International Paper Company Does not show up in Credit Agg-No exposure? Solitair Corporation Does not show up in Credit Agg-No exposure? Small Ventures USA Gas-No exposure-Credit Agg and Tagg indicate Swaption has expired The Kroger Co. Does not show up in Credit Agg-No exposure? Tom Brown Inc Does not show up in Credit Agg-No exposure? TransAlta Energy Power-not in Tagg Wells Fargo Bank Does not show up in Credit Agg-No exposure? Wexford Spectrum Does not show up in Credit Agg-No exposure? Maria Garza x37019
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: D/F CP's missing from Gas
Q: Suzanne: Could you please go into the following Shari Stack files and print out all of the docs that are in these files? WSPP Agt. Municipality Info Thanks.
Propose a subject line
A: Docs
Here is an email: Hi Lee: Looks great. Could you do me a favor? You have "generating company" rep on the agenda. Enron does not see itself as a generating company. In fact, the only generation that we own in California is 50+ MWs of wind power in Southern California. Could you change it to "energy service provider" rep? Hope that's not a problem. Best,
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A:
Website