Question:
Based on the premise "5 million green-card holders resident in the United States in 1996 were eligible to apply for U.S. citizenship.)", can we conclude that "Nobody in 1996 was allowed to apply for U.S. citizenship."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
no

Question: Sentence A: yeah because those things are pretty expensive aren't they

Sentence B: Because those things are costly, aren't they?

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Question: um i don't i don't really know about that uh uh if well uh i think i think it's it's only it only applies to certain a very few types of crimes uh murder and i think kidnapping could carry death penalty as well i'm not sure what how what the range is for uh for the crimes that uh would merit a death penalty
Some crimes merit the death penalty.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Problem: Here is a premise:
Most films in Ibiza's cinemas have been dubbed into Spanish.

Here is a hypothesis:
Most movies in the theaters of Ibiza have received Spanish dubs.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Sentence 1: So we sit." He spat on the ground.

Sentence 2: The man chuckled before spitting on the ground.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Premise:
"Directly opposite, high on the cliff face, are three magnificent, crumbling Royal Tombs, similar in size and style to the Treasury."
Hypothesis: The cliff face is smooth and unmarked; nothing is built into it.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
no