Problem: Here is a premise:
um so it seems to me that that um there needs to be some ground you know some rules that protect

Here is a hypothesis:
There needs to be some ground rules as to how we handle these people.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Sentence 1: Had the beastly thing stuck?

Sentence 2: Did the beastly thing stick?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: yes

Question:
My father has books about them.

Does it follow that "My father was interested in them before."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
it is not possible to tell

Q: If yeah i've uh worked with a couple of people who have owned uh various years uh Mercedes and, can we say that "I worked with a couple people who owned a Mercedes from investing in the oil industry. "?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A: it is not possible to tell

Premise:
"The rule was promulgated through notice and comment rulemaking procedures of 5 U.S.C."
Hypothesis: The rule was communicated through the procedures of 5 U.S.C.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

yes

Sentence 1: 20For more information about defining federal investment for long-term economic growth, see Budget Choosing Public Investment Programs (GAO/AIMD-93-25, July 23, 1993) and related GAO products listed in appendix V.

Sentence 2: Budget Choosing Public Investment Programs was published in August of 2017.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer:
no