QUESTION: Given the sentence "Several men working on a motorcycle." can we conclude that "Two motorcycles sit in the corner of a shop."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Let's solve it slowly: Either several men are working on a motorcycle or two motorcycles are sitting in a shop.
The answer is no.

[QUESTION] Can we conclude from "Kids play in a blue tub full of water outside." that "Kids are playing in a tub full of ice cold water outside in the summer."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
Not all tubs of water are ice cold and it doesn't have to be summer to go outside.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

Q: Given the sentence "A little kid playing gamecube at mcdonald's." is it true that "A little boy playing mario on a gamecube at mcdonald's."?
A: The little boy could be playing a game other than Mario.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

QUESTION: Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "A man placing his hand inside the pot of a small tree as he squats behind a row of other small trees."
Hypothesis: "A man is trying to see if an animals are residing in the pot."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell

Let's solve it slowly: A man placing his hand inside the pot of a small tree don't necessarily imply that he is trying to see if animals are residing in the pot.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

[QUESTION] Premise: "Food workers sort through new stock while wearing blue gloves."
Hypothesis: "The workers are not wearing gloves."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
The workers are either not wearing gloves or wearing blue gloves.
The answer is no.

Q: Premise: "There are buildings in the background."
Hypothesis: "The background is full of fields and no buildings."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
A:
There cannot be buildings in the background and no buildings simultaneously.
The answer is no.