Here is a premise:
Moreover, the allocation is subject to an increasing reduction each year (a 1 percent increase each year for twenty years and a 2.5 percent reduction each year thereafter), with a corresponding increase in the amounts of allowances auctioned for each year.

Here is a hypothesis:
The allocation is relatively unaffected by increase in the allowances each year.

Is it possible to conclude that if the premise is true, then so is the hypothesis?
no