Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.

Example input: This is what I read when it comes from an EWEB commish, 'Shut up and take it!'
Example output: Yes
Example explanation: The comment has term 'commish' which is an insult, also the phrase 'shut up and take it' is insulting as well. The comment is classified to be insulting. Hence, it is a positive example
Q: Leo Karpinski:
In ten years, the salary cost of employees in just the gov's office alone has increased more than two million dollars.

Gov's Office

FY2007

Total employees - 77

Total Personal Services- $7,165,100

https://www.omb.alaska.gov/ombfiles/07_budget/Gov/comp6.pdf

FY2017

Total employees - 73

Total Personal Services - $9,300,845

https://www.omb.alaska.gov/ombfiles/17_budget/Gov/Proposed/comp6.pdf

Remember Walker promised to rein in salary costs?

He lied.

Alaskans now have to fund these high unsustainable blooming state salaries because investment co. CEO's, GCI, unions, bankers, a cadre of their lobbyists, and whoever else, including the Dispatch publisher, were selected to hatch financial schemes at those closed-door, closed-to- public meetings in the gov's office.

Walker, "Where's that dang S&P release that says my plan passed the senate? We need it - now! Before the House vote! Quick, call Hackney, Gillam, Rogoff, Duncan! Get 'em on it to get 'er done!"
A:
Yes