Teacher: Given reviews from Amazon, classify those review based on their content into two classes: Negative or Positive.
Teacher: Now, understand the problem? If you are still confused, see the following example:
I've read this book with much expectation, it was very boring all through out the book
Solution: Negative
Reason: Review writer does not like the book because it was boring, therefore it is a negative review.

Now, solve this instance: Hutton more or less aproached the book as an unbiased historian instead of going out of his way to critique Wicca. Although just stating the facts in itself makes wicca look silly. I'd recomend reading this book. As much as I dislike Wicca the history and evolution of it is interesting.Wiccas roots are in freemasonry, crowleyish occult b.s and well meaning but flawed writers like Yeats, Frazer and Graves. Once you get past where its roots lie it gets even worse. Wicca has absolutely nothing to do with true Heathenry. Its more or less a bunch of made up crap. I look at Wiccans as borderline retarded goofballs and roleplayers. I don't spend much time worrying or thinking about them, but I hate that most peoples perceptions of Celtic Heathenry comes from wiccan non sense and that they are making inroads into the Asatru community.
Student:
Positive