Teacher: In this task, you are given a paper review. Based on the review, your job is to identify language and generate "en" if the review is in English or generate "es" if the review is in Spanish. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].
Teacher: Now, understand the problem? If you are still confused, see the following example:
Este articulo no es un articulo de investigacion, ya que solo muestra como programar un robot mediante la herramienta de logica difusa. Este tema ya ha sido propuesto como solucion en navegacion de robots.
Solution: es
Reason: This review is written in spanish. Hence, the label is 'es'.

Now, solve this instance: Here is a summary of the reviews: Strengths Experiments are done on state-of-the-art networks, on a real speech recognition problem (R3, R1) Networks themselves are of a very large size (R3) Computational gains are substantial (R3, R4) Paper is clear (R1) Weaknesses Experiments are all done on a private dataset (R3) No comparison to other pruning approaches (e.g. Han et al.) (R3); AC notes that reviewers added new results which compare to an existing pruning method No comparison to distillation techniques (R1) Paper doesn't present much novelty in terms of ideas (R3) The AC encouraged feedback from the reviewers following author rebuttal and paper improvements. Reviewers stated that the improvements made to the paper made it publishable but was still closer to the threshold. R1 who had originally rated the paper 3: a "clear reject" updated the score to 6 (just above acceptance). Considering the reviews and discussions, the AC thinks that this paper is a poster accept. There are no serious flaws, the improvements made to the paper during the discussion paper have satisfied the reviewers, and this is an important topic with practical benefits; evaluated on a real large-scale problem.
Student:
en