IN: This is an email
Janine: With respect to the attached (internal) FX product for EOL, I just wanted to verify with you that internal counterparties should transact on EOL with: (1) RMT (as principal for Houston FX desk) (2) EEFT as agent for RMT (as principal for London FX desk). In this regard, was the services agreement between ENA and EEFT ever extended to include RMT for internal trades? (3) Enron Japan Corp. (as principal for Tokyo FX desk) There appears to be some confusion since our meeting of November 3. Thanks. Sara

What is the subject?

OUT: FX Product

IN: This is an email
Hi Dave, I received a signed change order from Randy Milcer (not sure about that) yesterday. The form he signed indicates that ABB will be paying Enron, and has one small mistake in the amount of payments made on the cancelled transformers ($400 off). With your permission I will substitute the correct version so ABB gets the money. Thanks,

What is the subject?

OUT: Change order

IN: This is an email
Might close on the letter agreement today. You didn't miss much - mostly negotiations with GE re: change orders. Our tax guys are happy, and Accounting is hanging in there. We have revised the payment schedule in the doc, but NW doesn't have the change. I'll send it to you. The change is minor. I need to revise the assignment/assumption agreement, then we'll be ready to go when GE signs up to the CO's. Kay

What is the subject?

OUT:
NorthWestern