Teacher:In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.
Teacher: Now, understand the problem? Solve this instance: Comment: I have already posted several times on the Russian purchase of yellowcake mineral right from a rancher in, I believe, Wyoming. Russia and the US have maintained mutual trade in uranium ores for decades. This was a propaganda win for Putin in Russia, but meaningless in context, and Uranium is still a strategic mineral whose trade is overseen by the State Department. Clinton initially approved sale of mineral rights to a Canadian consortium; after that, it was out of her hands. But as you know we buy nuclear triggers from Russia under treaty.

The Clinton Foundation is (or was) active in supporting medical aid to African nations. Their books are open. Feel free to wade through them. Like all other Clinton haters, your arse is sucking swamp water.
Student:
Obscene