In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: insult and non-insult. Insult is any lanugage or act that is disrespectful or scornfully abusive.

Comment: If it was against the law then why did they "let him off" with a warning about being inappropriate and not wrong ? I don't advocate taking these kinds of pictures and don't do it myself, but nobody here, including Motley Fool has made a case that the guy broke the law. And in my, psychologically damaged, mind he may have acted rudely and cruely, but did not break the law. And, again, if the woman is so bothered by people looking at or taking pictures of he bare flesh then she can cover it up. AND she didn't seem to have an issue with it until she was denied a promotion, unless I am reading the story incorrectly.
Non-insult

Comment: "we have no right to take those lives away....period!"

Sure we do. Who says we don't?
Non-insult

Comment: HAH...this guy's an idiot. I used to go 'round with him just before the Iraq Invasion. Told him the whole WMD's/global threat/terrorist thing was bull, and it'd turn into a nightmare. He labeled me a liberal (in many ways I'm far from it), told me I hated America, didn't know what I was talking about. I think I'll go to one of his rallies and get in his face about it again.

The guy was clueless then, and people like him don't learn.
Insult