Q: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.
Comment: wrong.
Viewing a body is NOT a sexual desire. Seeing that somebody has a natural huge set of breasts, OR a huge penis, OR a double Vagina or even double Penis (and yes, BOTH EXISTS), is no different than finding that a massive tumor was in say the small intestine, blocking nearly everything, and yet, the patent did not realize it. Or when a women comes in heavy but feeling funny and it turns out that she is having a baby (and yes, AGAIN, this happens).

Now, if they were mishandling the body, OR were taking pix for personal use, then yeah, I have a REAL issue with it. BUT, docs, nurses, etc work on our bodies day in and day out and need to know when things are not right. They also need to know what CAN be different (which is why I like older docs for PSP and young for specialists ).
A:
Sexual-explicit