In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Ex Input:
Comment: Le Pen represents France's last hope to remain French. She is being trashed by the globalists and their pet candidates because they fear another Brexit-style surprise. As usual, they are enlisting the services of their accomplices, the pollsters, in order to achieve the desired results. French voters need to give the elites a good swift kick in the cojones.

Ex Output:
Sexual-explicit

Ex Input:
Comment: Trid sees nothing wrong with "No Dogs or Jews", "We don't serve Muslims" and so on. He supports bigotry. And no, that is NOT a straw man, but the clear and obvious implication of your " If either the buyer or the seller does not want to enter into that contract for whatever reason then I believe they have the right to refuse." Thank you for proving that your claim to being a Christian is a complete sham.

Ex Output:
Non-sexual-explicit

Ex Input:
Comment: Option 5: just drop the useless thing. Everyone knows who kills indigenous women but this is not what the indigenous leader wants to talk about, they want to talk about the police and "systemic racicism". This reminds me of Black Lives Matters who attacks the police for killing black men but won't talk about black on black crimes that kills way more black men then the police.

Ex Output:
Non-sexual-explicit