Sentence 1: The Andersen story illustrates how a few people can do the wrong thing with catastrophic consequences for many innocent parties.

Sentence 2: The actions of a few never have consequences for innocent parties.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: no

Question:
Now the salamander moved toward them, directed apparently by slight motions from Sather Karf.

Does it follow that "The salamander was moving away from them. "?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
no

Q: If The enemy was right behind., can we say that "The enemy was straight ahead. "?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A: no

Premise:
"Bauerstein's manner had started a flock of wild surmises in my mind. "
Hypothesis: I blamed everyone.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

it is not possible to tell

input question: Colleges still pay for his slurred, mangled speeches. If this premise is true, does that tell us:"His speeches are slurred and mangled because he is always drunk."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: it is not possible to tell

Q: If uh yes i have uh automobile uh vandalism, can we say that "Yes, my automobile has been vandalized."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A:
yes