Problem: Here is a premise:
In the 1890s, Mugwumps such as Godkin crusaded for free trade and against tariff protection for corrupt manufacturers.

Here is a hypothesis:
Godkin was not a politician.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Sentence 1: In doing so, they may ultimately reduce the quality of life for the many of us who are less than perfectly endowed.

Sentence 2: Our quality of life could be reduced by doing so.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: yes

Question:
and we certainly uh we need more of that we need more parents willing to supervise though we've had such a breakdown in the family structure from the standpoint of of uh church and school and everything along the way

Does it follow that "We need more parents willing to supervise. "?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
yes

Q: If It was more than a sensitive soul could bear., can we say that "It was absolutely bearable."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A: no

Premise:
"The Passaic County office and its supporters see it differently."
Hypothesis: The Passaic County office sees it in the same way.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

no

Sentence 1: what did you call that

Sentence 2: You didn't refer to it as anything.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer:
no