Q: Berco Resources Inc, K#96000645, CP ID #26557. The Counterparty system indicates that this counterparty was suspended on 3/15/01. Cheryl Johnson's (Counterparty Group) comments state: "Spoke to Bill Bergner who states that he has sent documentation to legal regarding the conversion. He said they did business under a group of different entities other than "Inc." In Jan. '99, they combined those entities to form the LLC, so it wasn't a simple conversion per se. He also stated that this entity should be deleted (inactivated), as there will be no business conducted in that name. This record will be suspended pending inactivation." Does anyone in legal know anything about this because we do have an active contract in the contract system? This is part of the contract audit I've been working on. Thanks, - g
Propose a subject line
A: BERCO RESOURCES INC.

Q: I am working with Gary Kenagy to determine who has possession of the Gregg Engineering keys. I was informed that you may have a Gregg key. Please verify if this is true and the key number. Thank you,
Propose a subject line
A: Gregg Engineering Keys

Q: Donna explained how everything is working so Victor has killed the following deal tickets Deal Comment 470563 New Power Exchange buy 470568 New Power Exchange sell 470582 CPR Storage Sell 470587 CPR Storage Buy We will be using deal 456379 (purchase from New Power) through March 31st. Also, we need to make sure we do not recognize the storage balance in Sitara. Joann has the storage contract number if anyone has questions.
Propose a subject line
A: CGAS storage/exchange deal tickets for Nov-Mar

Q: This follows up on my voice-mail to you of just a few minutes ago. I reviewed a voice-mail from Theresa Bushman this morning about the timing on the new Mariner matter that Mariner for which Mariner would like to retain F&J. She has spoken with Scott Josie, apparently one of our business people, and has been advised that the December 27 closing is critical, due to market conditions. Theresa also believes that the December 27 date will be aggressive even for F&J, given the late date. Theresa, please let me know if I have mischaracterized what you said. I see two options: 1. If you agree with me that we can't sign the letter as is: I do my best to get an acceptable letter negotiated with Uriel Dutton today. If I can't, Mariner retains someone else today. Frankly, I am not optimistic about getting an acceptable letter from F&J, based on where F&J started. 2. If you believe that we need to go ahead and get the best deal we can from F&J under the circumstances: I will do my best to get that done by noon or so, and if F&J doesn't budge, we may have to sign the letter as is. Caveat: I don't know if Dutton is in the office this week, so he and I may not be able to communicate quickly. Also, if we redraft a letter, we will probably not have time to get comments back from all the other interested Enron attorneys. I would also suggest telling Kelly Zelacovitz, Mariner's GC, this morning what our game plan is, and if it is option one, have her go ahead and contact her back-up choices of law firms, start running conflicts checks, etc., and have them be ready to hit the ground running. If there is anyone else I need to send this e-mail to, please let me know. I am in all day today; please let me know what you want me to do. Britt
Propose a subject line
A:
In re F&J Representation