In the interest of time, I have revised our draft ISDA Schedule to conform in most material respects to the 1994 (effective 1992) agreement executed between ERMS and Merrill Lynch Capital Services, Inc. ("Old ISDA"). This was done to accommadate the Merrill lawyer, Gary Rosenblum (who didn't want to read our Schedule!). The Old ISDA is not identical to the format used by Merrill Lynch International today so I'm not sure how hard they will press for other changes. There are two potential credit issues that I see: (1) agreement as to the Enron Corp. guaranty cap (and possible Merrill Lynch guaranty cap) and (2) our introduction of a MAC provision in the form of an Additional Event of Default (necessary because the Old ISDA had a Credit Support Annex and this one does not). I left a voice mail for Gary Rosenblum and asked that he let me know when he was available on Monday to talk AND to have his credit person contact Rod Nelson. Sara P.S. I haven't heard from Morgan Guaranty Trust Company or Morgan Stanley Capital Services, Inc.
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: Merrill Lynch International
I need to have a form filled out that says I don't have health insurance coverage through Enron. Can you find out who I need to send it to in HR? Thanks,
Answer: statement of no coverage
Here is an email: Andrew, Note conference room for our meeting today. I'm also attaching a brief writeup of the deal so far from our perspective. You might want to review before our meeting so you will know where our current understanding (or misunderstanding :-) ) of the deal currently is. Thanks,
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: Stage Coach
Q: Kevin, Attached please find an intial draft of a purchase and sale agreement for the MEGS pipeline (Project Pluto). The document is based on the form of the agreement that was used when we purchased the asset. For review purposes, I have also included a comparison version to show the differences between the agreements. There are several issues that we need to discuss. As a summary, these include: - In the purchase and sale agreement, you will note areas (e.g., the recitals, schedules and exhibits) where I have noted that further text remains to be drafted. In particular, we need to discuss those schedules that identify what documents and contracts we have disclosed to Duke, given that LJM at one point in time was the indirect beneficial owner of this asset through it's one time ownership of MEGS LLC (see Section 3.15 disclosure statement); - Sections 2.2, 3.10 and 11 require Jerry Seade's tax review; - Whether for credit purposes, we need some form of payment guaranty / commitment letter from the parent company of Duke Energy Field Services (see section 7.4(g)); - The assignment agreements that will be required for the Gathering, O&M and Guaranty Agreements. Per the terms of the Gathering and O&M Agreements, no counter-party consents are required; however, a consent will be necessary for the Guaranty Agreement. I would suggest that we try to meet later this afternoon to discuss this agreement (I am tied up until 1:30 or so.) Thanks. Comparison Version:
Propose a subject line
A: Asset Purchase and Sale Agreement for MEGS Pipeline (Project Pluto)
IN: Steve Stonestreet said you have an email address for our team. I would like to have that please. I need to know what our demand charges are for some contracts that start in November. thanks

Generate a subject line.

OUT: CGAS Email
IN: This is an email
Great River Energy has been advised to close out the forward contract of May, June and July, 1,000 per day, pruchase price of $2.895/mmBtu at Ventura. I am open to a settlement based on the change in the market price for May, June and July at Ventura. Let's discuss today.

What is the subject?

OUT:
Forward Contract Close Out