In this task, you will be presented with a context from an academic paper and a question separated with a
. You have to answer the question based on the context.

Example Input: We published a survey on Reddit asking Danish speaking users to suggest offensive, sexist, and racist terms for a lexicon. Language and user behaviour varies between platforms, so the goal is to capture platform-specific terms. This gave 113 offensive and hateful terms which were used to find offensive comments. The remainder of comments in the corpus were shuffled and a subset of this corpus was then used to fill the remainder of the final dataset. The resulting dataset contains 3600 user-generated comments, 800 from Ekstra Bladet on Facebook, 1400 from r/DANMAG and 1400 from r/Denmark.
Question: How large was the dataset of Danish comments?
Example Output: 3600 user-generated comments

Example Input: We empirically test our approach on a series of experiments on WikiTableQuestions, to our knowledge the only dataset designed for this task. In Algorithm 1 we describe how logical forms are transformed into interpretable textual representations called "paraphrases".
Question: What is the source of the paraphrases of the questions?
Example Output: WikiTableQuestions

Example Input: Notably, automatic translations of TED talks contain more words than the corresponding reference translation, which means that machine-translated texts of this type have also more potential tokens to enter in a coreference relation, and potentially indicating a shining through effect. The same does not happen with the news test set. We see how NMT translations increase the number of mentions about $30\%$ with respect to human references showing even a more marked explicitation effect than human translations do.
Question: What translationese effects are seen in the analysis?
Example Output:
potentially indicating a shining through effect explicitation effect