In this task, you are given text for US Congressional and California state bills, your task is to generate a summary for this bill.
One example: SECTION 1. LIABILITY OF BUSINESS ENTITIES PROVIDING USE OF FACILITIES
TO NONPROFIT ORGANIZATIONS.

(a) Definitions.--In this section:
(1) Business entity.--The term ''business entity'' means a
firm, corporation, association, partnership, consortium, joint
venture, or other form of enterprise.
(2) Facility.--The term ''facility'' means any real
property, including any building, improvement, or appurtenance.
(3) Gross negligence.--The term ''gross negligence'' means
voluntary and conscious conduct by a person with knowledge (at
the time of the conduct) that the conduct is likely to be
harmful to the health or well-being of another person.
(4) Intentional misconduct.--The term ''intentional
misconduct'' means conduct by a person with knowledge (at the
time of the conduct) that the conduct is harmful to the health
or well-being of another person.
(5) Nonprofit organization.--The term ''nonprofit
organization'' means--
(A) any organization described in section 501(c)(3)
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and exempt from
tax under section 501(a) of such Code; or
(B) any not-for-profit organization organized and
conducted for public benefit and operated primarily for
charitable, civic, educational, religious, welfare, or
health purposes.
(6) State.--The term ''State'' means each of the several
States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto
Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, the Northern
Mariana Islands, any other territory or possession of the
United States, or any political subdivision of any such State,
territory, or possession.
(b) Limitation on Liability.--
(1) In general.--Subject to subsection (c), a business
entity shall not be subject to civil liability relating to any
injury or death occurring at a facility of the business entity
in connection with a use of such facility by a nonprofit
organization if--
(A) the use occurs outside of the scope of business
of the business entity;
(B) such injury or death occurs during a period
that such facility is used by the nonprofit
organization; and
(C) the business entity authorized the use of such
facility by the nonprofit organization.
(2) Application.--This subsection shall apply--
(A) with respect to civil liability under Federal
and State law; and
(B) regardless of whether a nonprofit organization
pays for the use of a facility.
(c) Exception for Liability.--Subsection (b) shall not apply to an
injury or death that results from an act or omission of a business
entity that constitutes gross negligence or intentional misconduct,
including any misconduct that--
(1) constitutes a crime of violence (as that term is
defined in section 16 of title 18, United States Code) or act
of international terrorism (as that term is defined in section
2331 of title 18) for which the defendant has been convicted in
any court;
(2) constitutes a hate crime (as that term is used in the
Hate Crime Statistics Act (28 U.S.C. 534 note));
(3) involves a sexual offense, as defined by applicable
State law, for which the defendant has been convicted in any
court; or
(4) involves misconduct for which the defendant has been
found to have violated a Federal or State civil rights law.
(d) Superseding Provision.--
(1) In general.--Subject to paragraph (2) and subsection
(e), this Act preempts the laws of any State to the extent that
such laws are inconsistent with this Act, except that this Act
shall not preempt any State law that provides additional
protection from liability for a business entity for an injury
or death with respect to which conditions under subparagraphs
(A) through (C) of subsection (b)(1) apply.
(2) Limitation.--Nothing in this Act shall be construed to
supersede any Federal or State health or safety law.
(e) Election of State Regarding Nonapplicability.--This Act shall
not apply to any civil action in a State court against a business
entity in which all parties are citizens of the State if such State
enacts a statute--
(1) citing the authority of this subsection;
(2) declaring the election of such State that this Act
shall not apply to such civil action in the State; and
(3) containing no other provision.
Solution is here: Shields a business entity from civil liability relating to any injury or death occurring at a facility of that entity in connection with a use of such facility by a nonprofit organization if: (1) the use occurs outside the scope of business of the business entity; (2) such injury or death occurs during a period that such facility is used by such organization; and (3) the business entity authorized the use of such facility by the organization.
Makes this Act inapplicable to an injury or death that results from an act or omission of a business entity that constitutes gross negligence or intentional misconduct, including misconduct that: (1) constitutes a hate crime or a crime of violence or act of international terrorism for which the defendant has been convicted in any court; or (2) involves a sexual offense for which the defendant has been convicted in any court or misconduct for which the defendant has been found to have violated a Federal or State civil rights law.
Preempts State laws to the extent that such laws are inconsistent with this Act, except State law that provides additional protection from liability. Specifies that this Act shall not be construed to supersede any Federal or State health or safety law.
Makes this Act inapplicable to any civil action in a State court against a business entity in which all parties are citizens of the State if such State, citing this Act's authority and containing no other provision, enacts a statute declaring the State's election that this Act shall not apply to such action in the State.
Explanation: This Bill focuses on shielding business entities from civil liability relating to an injury or death depending on the conditions of injury, hence the generated summary is correct.

Now, solve this: SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ''Regional Haze Federalism Act''.

SEC. 2. IMPLEMENTATION PLANS.

Section 110 of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7410) is amended--
(1) in subsection (c), by striking ''(c)(1) The
Administrator'' and all that follows through the end of
paragraph (1) and inserting the following:
''(c) Federal Plans.--
''(1) Plans.--
''(A) In general.--Except as provided in
subparagraph (C), unless the conditions described in
subparagraph (B) are met, the Administrator shall
promulgate a Federal implementation plan at any time
after the date that is 2 years after the date on which
the Administrator--
''(i) finds that a State has failed to make
a required submission or finds that the plan or
plan revision submitted by the State does not
satisfy the minimum criteria established under
subsection (k)(1)(A); or
''(ii) disapproves a State implementation
plan submission in whole or in part.
''(B) Conditions.--The conditions described in this
subparagraph are that, before the date on which the
Administrator promulgates a Federal implementation
plan--
''(i) a State corrects a deficiency in a
State implementation plan or plan revision
submitted by the State; and
''(ii) the Administrator approves the plan
or plan revision.
''(C) Visibility protection plans.--In the case of
a Federal implementation plan promulgated after the
date of enactment of this subparagraph in place of a
State implementation plan under section 169A--
''(i) the Administrator shall promulgate
such Federal implementation plan only if the
Administrator makes a finding that the State
submitting the State implementation plan failed
to consider the factors described in paragraphs
(1) and (2) of section 169A(g) in preparing and
submitting the plan; and
''(ii) compliance with the requirements of
such Federal implementation plan shall not be
required earlier than 5 years after the date of
promulgation.''; and
(2) in subsection (k)--
(A) by striking paragraph (3) and inserting the
following:
''(3) Full and partial approval and disapproval.--
''(A) In general.--Except as provided in
subparagraphs (B) through (D), in the case of any
submission on which the Administrator is required to
act under paragraph (2), the Administrator shall
approve the submission as a whole if the submission
meets all of the applicable requirements of this Act.
''(B) Review.--In reviewing any State
implementation plan submitted pursuant to section 169A,
the Administrator shall limit the review only to a
determination of whether the State submitting the State
implementation plan considered the factors described in
paragraphs (1) and (2) of section 169A(g) in preparing
and submitting the plan.
''(C) Visibility plans.--The Administrator shall
approve as a whole any implementation plan submitted
under section 169A that was prepared and submitted
after consideration of the factors described in
paragraphs (1) and (2) of section 169A(g).
''(D) Partial approval and disapproval.--
''(i) In general.--If a portion of a plan
revision meets all applicable requirements of
this Act, the Administrator may approve the
plan revision in part and disapprove the plan
revision in part.
''(ii) Full approval.--A plan revision
shall not be treated as meeting the
requirements of this Act until the
Administrator approves the entire plan revision
as complying with the applicable requirements
of this Act.''; and
(B) in paragraph (5)--
(i) in the first sentence, by striking
''Whenever'' and inserting the following:
''(A) In general.--Whenever''; and
(ii) by adding at the end the following:
''(B) Visibility plans.--Notwithstanding
subparagraph (A), with respect to an implementation
plan or portion of an implementation plan approved
pursuant to section 169A, the Administrator shall only
find that such a plan or portion of a plan is
substantially inadequate to meet standards for air
pollutants that cause or contribute to the impairment
of visibility, or any other applicable standard or
requirement, under that section if the Administrator
makes a finding that, in preparing the plan, the
submitting State failed to consider the factors
described in paragraphs (1) and (2) of section 169A(g).
''(C) Existing visibility plans.--
''(i) Request for revocation.--At any time
after the date of enactment of this
subparagraph--
''(I) a State may request that the
existing Federal or State
implementation plan for the State
regarding visibility or any
determination made in calendar year
2010 or 2011 of best available retrofit
technology pursuant to section 169A be
revoked; and
''(II) upon receipt of such a
request, the Administrator shall revoke
the implementation plan.
''(ii) Submission of new or revised plan.--
Upon a revocation under clause (i)(II), the
State that requested the revocation shall,
within a reasonable period of time, submit to
the Administrator a visibility plan or a
revised best available retrofit technology
determination in accordance with this Act.''.

SEC. 3. VISIBILITY PROTECTION FOR FEDERAL CLASS I AREAS.

Section 169A of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7491) is amended--
(1) in subsection (b)(2), in the matter preceding
subparagraph (A), by striking ''as may be necessary'' and
inserting ''as the State determines, at the sole discretion of
the State after considering factors described in this section
and providing adequate opportunity for public comment, may be
necessary''; and
(2) in subsection (g)--
(A) by striking paragraph (1) and inserting the
following:
''(1) in determining reasonable progress, there shall be
taken into consideration--
''(A) the costs of compliance;
''(B) the time necessary for compliance;
''(C) the energy and nonair quality environmental
impacts of compliance;
''(D) the remaining useful life of any existing
source subject to requirements under this section;
''(E) the degree of improvement in visibility that
may reasonably be anticipated to result from measures
described in the applicable implementation plan; and
''(F) the economic impacts to the State (including
people of the State);'';
(B) in paragraph (2)--
(i) by striking ''(2) in determining best
available retrofit technology the State'' and
inserting the following:
''(2) in determining the best available retrofit
technology--
''(A) the State'';
(ii) in subparagraph (A) (as designated by
clause (i)), by inserting ''the economic
impacts to the State (including people of the
State),'' after ''life of the source,'';
(iii) by striking ''technology;'' and
inserting ''technology; and''; and
(iv) by adding at the end the following:
''(B) the determination of best available retrofit
technology by the State for any source shall be subject
to review by the Administrator or an administrative
entity or Federal or State court only pursuant to a
clearly erroneous standard of review;''; and
(C) in paragraph (4), by striking ''(or the date of
promulgation of such a plan revision in the case of
action by the Administrator under section 110(c) for
purposes of this section)''.
Solution:
Regional Haze Federalism Act - Amends the Clean Air Act to require the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to promulgate a federal implementation plan in place of a state implementation plan to remedy any impairment to visibility in designated class I areas (international parks, wilderness areas and memorial parks that exceed 5,000 acres, and national parks that exceed 6,000 acres) only if: (1) such state failed to consider the costs of, the time necessary for, and and the energy and non-air quality environmental impacts of compliance with such plan and the remaining useful life of any existing air pollution source; and (2) compliance with federal implementation plan requirements is not required earlier than five years after the date of promulgation.

Requires: (1) the Administrator to revoke an existing federal or state implementation plan for a state regarding visibility or any determination made in 2010 or 2011 of best available retrofit technology for a source upon receipt of a request by such state; and (2) such state to submit to the Administrator a visibility plan or a revised retrofit technology determination within a reasonable period of time.

Provides that states have sole discretion, after considering certain economic factors, in determining emission limits, schedules of compliance, and other measures for each applicable implementation plan for a state for any area that is listed as contributing to impairment of visibility.

Requires the state, in determining best available retrofit technology (or the Administrator in determining emission limitations that reflect such technology), to consider, in addition to other factors, the economic impacts to the state and the degree of improvement in visibility that may reasonably be anticipated to result from measures described in the applicable implementation plan. Provides that a state's determination of such technology for any source may be subject to review by the Administrator or an administrative entity or federal or state court only pursuant to a clearly erroneous standard of review.