Question: Sentence A: In 1992 the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) adopted rules to implement the requirements of the Hearing Aid Compatibility Act of 1988, 47 U.S.C.

Sentence B: The FCC vetoed the rules about the act.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question: But see at least one before you pass judgement on this extraordinary institution.
Make you judgement on the institution before visiting one.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Problem: Here is a premise:
they're playing it right now

Here is a hypothesis:
They are not playing.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Sentence 1: Changes in national saving cause the ratio of net foreign investment to GDP to move around its longterm trend.

Sentence 2: National saving changes causes GDP's net foreign investment to move its longstanding trend.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: yes

Question:
yeah but uh you know it's uh i guess the difficulty would be to somebody could obviously just take it right off the tailpipe again so you'd probably have to build it right into the muffler or something

Does it follow that "If the tailpipe is taken off then don't try to fix it at all, especially not into the muffler."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
no

Question:
Based on the premise "GSA has incorporated these policies into the Federal Property Management Regulations5 and the Federal Travel Regulation,6 applicable to most federal civilian employees.", can we conclude that "The regulations that the GSA have in place help federal civilian employees."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
it is not possible to tell