Question:
Based on the premise "Then we could have obtained a computer for you and you could have simulated our sky as it should be within your computer and forced it to be repaired long ago.", can we conclude that "Then you could have used your magic to repair our sky."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
no

Question: Sentence A: Like some men who have no formal education, Amos is highly respectful of the printed word.

Sentence B: People with formal education often don't respect printed word.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question: But she is still a child.
But she is still too young.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Problem: Here is a premise:
Dawkins' own honesty and thoroughness undermine his case in other ways as well--for example, when he brings up the origin of life.

Here is a hypothesis:
Dawkins makes no reference to the origin of life.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Sentence 1: Other agencies' had these and, in some cases, other innovative features.

Sentence 2: Some agencies have innovative features like new software.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Premise:
"Therefore, the construction effort and need for equipment is relatively modest compared to the more involved SCR and FGD projects."
Hypothesis: The construction effort is modest.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
yes