Sentence 1: In other words, averting a HI shortfall for 75 years now would require an increase in payroll taxes by 1.97 percent (a 68-percent increase over the 2001 rate paid by employers and workers47), a cut in HI spending by 37 percent, or some combination of the two.

Sentence 2: An increase in payroll taxes would be required to avoid a shortfall for 75 years.
Available options:
[i] yes
[ii] it is not possible to tell
[iii] no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first sentence?
[i]