input question: In the New York Times Book Review , Richard Jenkyns declares Fagles' language timeless. If this premise is true, does that tell us:"Richard Jenkyns declared Fagle's language timeless."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: yes

Question:
Based on the premise "She understood Boris's agitation.", can we conclude that "Boris was calm and did not appear agitated at all."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
no

Question: Sentence A: The existing deadline for entities to submit new applications based on those actions is moved up from January 1, 2010 to one year after enactment.

Sentence B: No new applications will be accepted after January 1, 2010 regardless of the actions that have taken place.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question: The upstairs restaurant features Madeiran food and has excellent panoramic views.
The food at the restaurant is delicious.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Problem: Here is a premise:
oh that's terrible i'm jealous

Here is a hypothesis:
I wish that happened to me.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question:
When ordering, it is customary to be taken to the kitchen to look at the various dishes you will find printed menus only in tourist restaurants.

Does it follow that "Only tourists restaurants give out printed menus."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
yes