IN: I am getting some pressure to get the database opened to the world. The only thing left to do to get that done was to get the Portland masters migrated out. What's happening with that?

Generate a subject line.

OUT: Master Swap Agreement Database
IN: This is an email
Sorry for the mixup. Attached is template for confirm and then the GTC (minus tax reps). I'm trying to fit in the tax reps in between phone calls and will distribute to Susan Musch (tax) for review. Stuart: Who else should be on the review list? Thanks. Sara

What is the subject?

OUT: par forward attachments
QUESTION: On September 13, 2001, the Commission accepted AEP's revised OATT for the Texas pilot retail choice program. The acceptance is subject to refund depending on the outcome of settlement proceedings in which AEP and protestors have been asked to work out differences regarding ancillary service provisions. Specifically, East Texas Cooperatives and Cooperative Customer Group - West complained that the OATT is an attempt to abrogate existing contracts they have with AEP. Let me know if you need further information. Susan Lindberg x30596
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: AEP tariff revisions (ER01-2658)
ENA can confirm the transaction on our "omnibus confirmation" with one or two minor changes (Joe: please call me). Also, ENA sent a draft ISDA Master Agreement to Puget Sound Energy on 3/9/99. If you anticipate more financial trading, please let me know as we should pursue execution of the ISDA Master Agreement. Thanks. Sara
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: Puget Sound Energy
RBowers@nyiso.com writes to the NYISO_TECH_EXCHANGE Discussion List: The NYISO is delaying issuance of the November & December 1999 - 2nd Settlement Adjustments, scheduled for September 7th, by a week. The delay is necessary to make corrections to the re-engineered invoicing process under which these settlements will be made. Settlements for November 1999 through March 2000 were "trued-up" once under a process that only adjusted settlements at the hourly interval level. Upon realizing that the now superseded process was deficient in its ability to "true-up" settlements at the SCD interval level, the process was completely re-engineered and put into operation in February 2001. In order to perform the 2nd settlement adjustments [a.k.a. true-ups] for November through March under the new process, the 1st true-ups of these months must be reversed to create the billing determinant measurement set that was used in the 1st true-up. The newly acquired billing determinants for the 2nd settlement adjustments will then be netted against the set from the 1st true-ups. That delta will then become the amount invoiced for the 2nd settlement adjustment. This delay is to fix mapping problems observed between the old measurement set invoicing format and the new measurement set formats. Invoices will be issued once the mapping problems have been corrected and we am satisfied that the settlements can be readily reconciled by our Market Participants. The NYISO apologizes for this delay and any resultant problems. Regards,
Answer: November & December 1999 Settlement Adjustments
Q: CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT Please review attached memo and provide me comments early Thursday morning. Kevin and Rodgers saw an earlier draft and I do not want to recirculate to them for their final review until we have all legal input. Thanks
Propose a subject line
A:
Draft TVA memo