In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Ex Input:
Comment: But where was Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton and the entire liberal "progressive" Establishment during Obama's eight years in the White House? Busy waging wars in various Islamic countries and quietly sending killer drones to kill Muslims in countries all over the Middle East and North Africa.
Not only did they do nothing to decrease racism, Obama's soaring anti-racism rhetoric ended the day he became president and devoted all his power to bailing out Wall Street while abandoning Main Street.

Ex Output:
Non-sexual-explicit

Ex Input:
Comment: Yes, the VAGINA negates everything, unless it's being used for making more rethuglican rugrats, pleasure, or, on rare occasion, shooting Ping Pong balls.

At least that's how the GOP view women.

Ex Output:
Sexual-explicit

Ex Input:
Comment: Yeah, I'e been living with this issue for most of my life. I'm happy to keep it alive.

There's no question that men who make sexual overtures from a position of power commit an abuse of power. And yes, it's exactly these blurry lines that become problematic.

When I was quite young (I may even have been a minor) I had a boss who got sexual with me when we were alone in a room. I rebuffed him, and he was a gentleman about it. I was really annoyed, but I continued to work at that job for a while. Was it an abuse of power? Yes. Was it a crime? Actually, legally it may have been. But I don't think of it as a crime. Women used to experience this kind of stuff all the time. I'd like to think the culture has changed a bit since then.

Unfortunately, as you may remember, I have also been a rape victim. So I give women who claim they've been raped the benefit of the doubt. But...at times, it's not the truth.

Ex Output:
Sexual-explicit