In this task, you will be shown a sentence, and you should determine whether it is overruling or non-overruling. In law, an overruling sentence is a statement that nullifies a previous case decision as a precedent by a constitutionally valid statute or a decision by the same or higher ranking court which establishes a different rule on the point of law involved. Classify your answers into overruling or non-overruling
--------
Question: rules declared valid smith, john, judge minnesota department of public safety jack y. perry, jason r. asmus, briggs and morgan, p.a., minneapolis, minnesota (for petitioners) lori swanson, attorney general, stephen d. melchionne, assistant attorney general, st. paul, minnesota (for respondents) considered and decided by halbrooks, presiding judge; rodenberg, judge; and smith, john, judge.

Answer: non-overruling

Question: we recede from columbia casualty co. v. zimmerman, 62 so.2d 338 (fla. 1952), and the cases which relied upon it to the extent that the columbia casualty decision is in conflict with our answer to the certified question.

Answer: overruling

Question: ""'this result only follows, however, if the misrepresentation relates to the very nature of the proposed contract itself and not merely to one of its nonessential terms.'"" brumley, 945 n.e.2d at 779 (quoting restatement (second) of contracts 163 (1981)).

Answer:
non-overruling