Q: Attached is the First Amendment to License Agreement which extends the term of the contract to March 31, 2001. My understanding is that you will be sending it directly to FT. Once they have signed off on the form, let me know and I will get Mark Greenberg to initial it and get it signed by an officer of EnronOnline. Call me at x33399 if you have any questions or if I can be of further assistance.
Propose a subject line
A: Financial Times Energy Amendment
IN: FUN! Copy this email onto a new email (don't fwd),insert your responses, and send out to learn FASCINATING things about friends you have likely known since birth! 1. Living Arrangement: let's not go there 2. What book are you reading now? The Great Santini & Preservation Principles of Colonial Era Structures (no, seriously) 3. What is on your mouse pad? huh? 4. Favorite Game? castlevania on nintendo (...64, you snobs) 5. Favorite Magazine? architectual digest/ martha stwart living 6. Favorite Smells? puppy breath 7. Favorite Sounds? piano 8. Worst feeling in the world? rt when you realize you'll be vomiting all day 9.What is the first thing you do when you wake up? brush teeth 10. Favorite Color? red 11. How many rings before you answer the phone? i don't 12. Future child's name? what child? 13. What is most important in life? family, friends, integrity 14. Favorite foods? chicken and dumplings 15.Chocolate or Vanilla? chocolate 16. Like to drive fast? just efficiently 17.Do you sleep with a stuffed animal? i'll take the 5th 8. Storms (Cool or Scary) Cool 19. What type was your first car? jeep 20. What one person dead or alive would you like to meet? georgia o'keefe or jesus christ 21. What is your Zodiac sign? libra 22. Favorite alcoholic drink? hmmmmm.... 23. Do you eat the stems of broccoli? if there's velveeta on them 24. What job do you dream of having? internat'l architect, curator @ monitcello 25. If you could dye your hair any color? jet black chinese bob 26. Have you ever been in love? yes 27. Is your glass 1/2 Full or 1/2 Empty? 1/2 empty 29. Favorite movies? the graduate, spinal tap, parenthood 30.Do you type with your fingers on the right keys? god, no 30. What's under your bed? layers of crap dating back to the late 80's 31. What is your favorite number? 3 32. Your favorite sport to watch? basketball 33. Say one nice thing about the person who sent this to you. brittany has always had great work ethic.....and is always easy and good to talk to even if you are a lazy bum and haven't called or emailed in months 32.Person you sent this to who is most likely to respond? lisa 35. Of the people you sent this to, who is not likely to respond? boys!

Generate a subject line.

OUT: you know you're not really working rt now anyways....
IN: This is an email
Guys, this is the real deal - we need to be ahead of this!!! How are we making out on acquiring brownfield sites and formulating a strategy? Regards

What is the subject?

OUT: Dow Jones Gas vs. Coal feature
QUESTION: Tanya: There's no short answer with these people! I think we are fine with their setoff language (part A only) because the NDP always has the option to permit setoff to other agreements between the parties as to amounts payable by the Payee to the Payer (where the Payer owes money under the ISDA to the Payee). So here's my recommendation: (1) Call your friend Andre and hear what he has to say. He has some kind of suggestion about Part (B) and limiting the NDP's payment to the DP to be based upon satisfaction that "nondisputed" amounts having been paid by the DP. Will he also raise the "other agreements" issue here? Not a clue. (2) If Cargill leaves part A in tact and we agree to change part B, I'M FINE. (I'm fine without part B, actually) (3) The potential problem is that Cargill and ENA view part A differently, right off the bat. I think Cargill is wrong because they don't read part A as applying to "other agreements between the parties". But Cargill proposed part A and it DOES apply to "other agreememts between the parties." I don't want to start off on the wrong foot so I'm sure I'll have to discuss this again with Marty. Thanks for your continued help. Sara
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: Cargill, Incorporated - the final SETOFF discussion
Sam: Until Gary's group receives access to this part of our Lotus Notes database, we will have to rely on my "in the pipeline" list. The following agreements from that list need to be added to Lotus Notes: (1) BuySideDirect (2) Ing Barings (3) Thomas Weisel Partners (4) Market Axess (5) LIMITrader Securities, Inc. (6) Trading Edge, Inc. My list identifies the Enron companies. Thanks. Sara
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: Lotus Notes - Brokerage Agreements
Marlo, The name and number of the person to contact regarding the billing discrepancy for July 2001 is Mary Reid @ 213-244-3898. Gasselect clearly shows only one trade for 43,559 mmbtu's from account 2527 to Z99. Mat
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer:
Socal discrepancy