Not wearing a helmet is not implied by a man skateboarding.. So what could be the question?
Question followed by answer: If "A young man goes air-born while his skateboard spins underneath him." does that mean that "The man is not wearing a helmet."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
it is not possible to tell
A man who leaps cannot be the same man who didn't leap.
The question and answer are below.
Can we conclude from "The man leaps above the other team to spike the ball." that "He didn't leap."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
no
It was an Asian man with a staff that was fighting.
The question and answer are below.
Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "An asian man is fighting with a staff."
Hypothesis: "A man is fighting."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
yes
A man in a black jacket pole-vaulting is still a man pole-vaulting.. So what could be the question?
Question followed by answer: If "A man in a black jacket pole-vaulting on the beach." does that mean that "A man is pole-vaulting."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
yes
A worker who places branches of wood into a chipper does not have to be a lumberjack.
The question and answer are below.
Given the sentence "A worker is placing branches of wood into a chipper." can we conclude that "The man is a lumberjack."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
it is not possible to tell
Being in front of a wall and near a wall could be two totally different things.
The question and answer are below.
Premise: "A man on a phone and a woman are in front of a wall."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A man on a phone and a woman are near a wall." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
it is not possible to tell