TASK DEFINITION: Given an abstract, indicate which of the provided candidate titles (Option1 and Option2) best describes it (respond with the text of the title, not option1/2).
PROBLEM: Abstract: Pure sarcomas of the esophagus are exceedingly rare. We report a case of esophageal synovial sarcoma which occurred in an adolescent. The tumor was locally resected, sparing the patient esophagectomy. After postoperative radiation therapy, the patient remains alive and well without evidence of disease 28 mo after operation. The unique nature of polypoid sarcoma of the esophagus, and the potential for cure without esophagectomy, is discussed.
Which is the apt title for the abstract? option1: Polypoid synovial sarcoma of the esophagus. option2: Central venous septic thrombosis managed by superior vena cava Greenfield filter and venous thrombectomy: a case report.

SOLUTION: Polypoid synovial sarcoma of the esophagus.

PROBLEM: Abstract: We report a 59-year-old, dark-complexioned black man with a giant basal cell carcinoma infiltrating virtually the entire scalp. Widespread metastatic bone marrow involvement produced a myelophthisic anemia. Basal cell carcinoma is rare in blacks, is rarely this large, and very rarely produces myelophthisic anemia from bone marrow metastases.
Which is the apt title for the abstract? option1: Giant basal cell carcinoma with metastases and myelophthisic anemia. option2: Frozen shoulder.

SOLUTION: Giant basal cell carcinoma with metastases and myelophthisic anemia.

PROBLEM: Abstract: At the University of Texas Medical School at Houston we had a unique opportunity to examine performance through the medical curriculum and one year of postgraduate training of 50 students initially rejected for medical school. Each had been interviewed by the same Admissions Committee, which earlier had selected 150 students through the traditional process. In contrasting the initially accepted and initially rejected groups, academic and demographic variables accounted for only 28% of group difference. The 72% of group difference not accounted for by the variables examined was presumed to relate to Admissions Committee preference. In attrition and in both preclinical and clinical performance through medical school and one year of postgraduate training, there were no meaningful differences between the groups. The observations suggest that the traditional interview process probably does not enhance the ability to predict performance of medical school applicants.
Which is the apt title for the abstract? option1: Medical school performance of initially rejected students. option2: Proceedings of the First National Conference on Pediatric Trauma. Boston, September 26-27, 1985.

SOLUTION:
Medical school performance of initially rejected students.