Teacher: In this task, you are given text for US Congressional and California state bills, your task is to generate a summary for this bill.
Teacher: Now, understand the problem? If you are still confused, see the following example:
SECTION 1. LIABILITY OF BUSINESS ENTITIES PROVIDING USE OF FACILITIES
TO NONPROFIT ORGANIZATIONS.

(a) Definitions.--In this section:
(1) Business entity.--The term ''business entity'' means a
firm, corporation, association, partnership, consortium, joint
venture, or other form of enterprise.
(2) Facility.--The term ''facility'' means any real
property, including any building, improvement, or appurtenance.
(3) Gross negligence.--The term ''gross negligence'' means
voluntary and conscious conduct by a person with knowledge (at
the time of the conduct) that the conduct is likely to be
harmful to the health or well-being of another person.
(4) Intentional misconduct.--The term ''intentional
misconduct'' means conduct by a person with knowledge (at the
time of the conduct) that the conduct is harmful to the health
or well-being of another person.
(5) Nonprofit organization.--The term ''nonprofit
organization'' means--
(A) any organization described in section 501(c)(3)
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and exempt from
tax under section 501(a) of such Code; or
(B) any not-for-profit organization organized and
conducted for public benefit and operated primarily for
charitable, civic, educational, religious, welfare, or
health purposes.
(6) State.--The term ''State'' means each of the several
States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto
Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, the Northern
Mariana Islands, any other territory or possession of the
United States, or any political subdivision of any such State,
territory, or possession.
(b) Limitation on Liability.--
(1) In general.--Subject to subsection (c), a business
entity shall not be subject to civil liability relating to any
injury or death occurring at a facility of the business entity
in connection with a use of such facility by a nonprofit
organization if--
(A) the use occurs outside of the scope of business
of the business entity;
(B) such injury or death occurs during a period
that such facility is used by the nonprofit
organization; and
(C) the business entity authorized the use of such
facility by the nonprofit organization.
(2) Application.--This subsection shall apply--
(A) with respect to civil liability under Federal
and State law; and
(B) regardless of whether a nonprofit organization
pays for the use of a facility.
(c) Exception for Liability.--Subsection (b) shall not apply to an
injury or death that results from an act or omission of a business
entity that constitutes gross negligence or intentional misconduct,
including any misconduct that--
(1) constitutes a crime of violence (as that term is
defined in section 16 of title 18, United States Code) or act
of international terrorism (as that term is defined in section
2331 of title 18) for which the defendant has been convicted in
any court;
(2) constitutes a hate crime (as that term is used in the
Hate Crime Statistics Act (28 U.S.C. 534 note));
(3) involves a sexual offense, as defined by applicable
State law, for which the defendant has been convicted in any
court; or
(4) involves misconduct for which the defendant has been
found to have violated a Federal or State civil rights law.
(d) Superseding Provision.--
(1) In general.--Subject to paragraph (2) and subsection
(e), this Act preempts the laws of any State to the extent that
such laws are inconsistent with this Act, except that this Act
shall not preempt any State law that provides additional
protection from liability for a business entity for an injury
or death with respect to which conditions under subparagraphs
(A) through (C) of subsection (b)(1) apply.
(2) Limitation.--Nothing in this Act shall be construed to
supersede any Federal or State health or safety law.
(e) Election of State Regarding Nonapplicability.--This Act shall
not apply to any civil action in a State court against a business
entity in which all parties are citizens of the State if such State
enacts a statute--
(1) citing the authority of this subsection;
(2) declaring the election of such State that this Act
shall not apply to such civil action in the State; and
(3) containing no other provision.
Solution: Shields a business entity from civil liability relating to any injury or death occurring at a facility of that entity in connection with a use of such facility by a nonprofit organization if: (1) the use occurs outside the scope of business of the business entity; (2) such injury or death occurs during a period that such facility is used by such organization; and (3) the business entity authorized the use of such facility by the organization.
Makes this Act inapplicable to an injury or death that results from an act or omission of a business entity that constitutes gross negligence or intentional misconduct, including misconduct that: (1) constitutes a hate crime or a crime of violence or act of international terrorism for which the defendant has been convicted in any court; or (2) involves a sexual offense for which the defendant has been convicted in any court or misconduct for which the defendant has been found to have violated a Federal or State civil rights law.
Preempts State laws to the extent that such laws are inconsistent with this Act, except State law that provides additional protection from liability. Specifies that this Act shall not be construed to supersede any Federal or State health or safety law.
Makes this Act inapplicable to any civil action in a State court against a business entity in which all parties are citizens of the State if such State, citing this Act's authority and containing no other provision, enacts a statute declaring the State's election that this Act shall not apply to such action in the State.
Reason: This Bill focuses on shielding business entities from civil liability relating to an injury or death depending on the conditions of injury, hence the generated summary is correct.

Now, solve this instance: SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE; REFERENCES.

(a) Short Title.--This Act may be cited as the ''Domain Name Piracy
Prevention Act of 1999''.
(b) References to the Trademark Act of 1946.--Any reference in this
Act to the Trademark Act of 1946 shall be a reference to the Act
entitled ''An Act to provide for the registration and protection of
trade-marks used in commerce, to carry out the provisions of certain
international conventions, and for other purposes'', approved July 5,
1946 (15 U.S.C. 1051 et seq.).

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

Congress finds the following:
(1) The registration, trafficking in, or use of a domain
name that is identical to, confusingly similar to, or dilutive
of a trademark or service mark of another that is distinctive
at the time of registration of the domain name, without regard
to the goods or services of the parties, with the bad-faith
intent to profit from the goodwill of another's mark (commonly
referred to as ''cyberpiracy'' and ''cybersquatting'')--
(A) results in consumer fraud and public confusion
as to the true source or sponsorship of goods and
services;
(B) impairs electronic commerce, which is important
to interstate commerce and the United States economy;
(C) deprives legitimate trademark owners of
substantial revenues and consumer goodwill; and
(D) places unreasonable, intolerable, and
overwhelming burdens on trademark owners in protecting
their valuable trademarks.
(2) Amendments to the Trademark Act of 1946 would clarify
the rights of a trademark owner to provide for adequate
remedies and to deter cyberpiracy and cybersquatting.

SEC. 3. CYBERPIRACY PREVENTION.

(a) In General.--Section 43 of the Trademark Act of 1946 (15 U.S.C.
1125) is amended by inserting at the end the following:
''(d)(1)(A) Any person who, with bad-faith intent to profit from
the goodwill of a trademark or service mark of another, registers,
traffics in, or uses a domain name that is identical to, confusingly
similar to, or dilutive of such trademark or service mark, without
regard to the goods or services of the parties, shall be liable in a
civil action by the owner of the mark, if the mark is distinctive at
the time of the registration of the domain name.
''(B) In determining whether there is a bad-faith intent described
under subparagraph (A), a court may consider factors such as, but not
limited to--
''(i) the trademark or other intellectual property rights
of the person, if any, in the domain name;
''(ii) the extent to which the domain name consists of the
legal name of the person or a name that is otherwise commonly
used to identify that person;
''(iii) the person's prior use, if any, of the domain name
in connection with the bona fide offering of any goods or
services;
''(iv) the person's legitimate noncommercial or fair use of
the mark in a site accessible under the domain name;
''(v) the person's intent to divert consumers from the mark
owner's online location to a site accessible under the domain
name that could harm the goodwill represented by the mark,
either for commercial gain or with the intent to tarnish or
disparage the mark, by creating a likelihood of confusion as to
the source, sponsorship, affiliation, or endorsement of the
site;
''(vi) the person's offer to transfer, sell, or otherwise
assign the domain name to the mark owner or any third party for
substantial consideration without having used, or having an
intent to use, the domain name in the bona fide offering of any
goods or services;
''(vii) the person's intentional provision of material and
misleading false contact information when applying for the
registration of the domain name; and
''(viii) the person's registration or acquisition of
multiple domain names which are identical to, confusingly
similar to, or dilutive of trademarks or service marks of
others that are distinctive at the time of registration of such
domain names, without regard to the goods or services of such
persons.
''(C) In any civil action involving the registration, trafficking,
or use of a domain name under this paragraph, a court may order the
forfeiture or cancellation of the domain name or the transfer of the
domain name to the owner of the mark.
''(2)(A) The owner of a mark may file an in rem civil action
against a domain name if--
''(i) the domain name violates any right of the registrant
of a mark registered in the Patent and Trademark Office, or
section 43 (a) or (c); and
''(ii) the court finds that the owner has demonstrated due
diligence and was not able to find a person who would have been
a defendant in a civil action under paragraph (1).
''(B) The remedies of an in rem action under this paragraph shall
be limited to a court order for the forfeiture or cancellation of the
domain name or the transfer of the domain name to the owner of the
mark.''.
(b) Additional Civil Action and Remedy.--The civil action
established under section 43(d)(1) of the Trademark Act of 1946 (as
added by this section) and any remedy available under such action shall
be in addition to any other civil action or remedy otherwise
applicable.

SEC. 4. DAMAGES AND REMEDIES.

(a) Remedies in Cases of Domain Name Piracy.--
(1) Injunctions.--Section 34(a) of the Trademark Act of
1946 (15 U.S.C. 1116(a)) is amended in the first sentence by
striking ''section 43(a)'' and inserting ''section 43 (a), (c),
or (d)''.
(2) Damages.--Section 35(a) of the Trademark Act of 1946
(15 U.S.C. 1117(a)) is amended in the first sentence by
inserting '', (c), or (d)'' after ''section 43 (a)''.
(b) Statutory Damages.--Section 35 of the Trademark Act of 1946 (15
U.S.C. 1117) is amended by adding at the end the following:
''(d) In a case involving a violation of section 43(d)(1), the
plaintiff may elect, at any time before final judgment is rendered by
the trial court, to recover, instead of actual damages and profits, an
award of statutory damages in the amount of not less than $1,000 and
not more than $100,000 per domain name, as the court considers just.
The court shall remit statutory damages in any case in which an
infringer believed and had reasonable grounds to believe that use of
the domain name by the infringer was a fair or otherwise lawful use.''.

SEC. 5. LIMITATION ON LIABILITY.

Section 32(2) of the Trademark Act of 1946 (15 U.S.C. 1114) is
amended--
(1) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A) by striking
''under section 43(a)'' and inserting ''under section 43 (a) or
(d)''; and
(2) by redesignating subparagraph (D) as subparagraph (E)
and inserting after subparagraph (C) the following:
''(D)(i) A domain name registrar, a domain name
registry, or other domain name registration authority
that takes any action described under clause (ii)
affecting a domain name shall not be liable for
monetary relief to any person for such action,
regardless of whether the domain name is finally
determined to infringe or dilute the mark.
''(ii) An action referred to under clause (i) is
any action of refusing to register, removing from
registration, transferring, temporarily disabling, or
permanently canceling a domain name--
''(I) in compliance with a court order
under section 43(d); or
''(II) in the implementation of a
reasonable policy by such registrar, registry,
or authority prohibiting the registration of a
domain name that is identical to, confusingly
similar to, or dilutive of another's mark
registered on the Principal Register of the
United States Patent and Trademark Office.
''(iii) A domain name registrar, a domain name
registry, or other domain name registration authority
shall not be liable for damages under this section for
the registration or maintenance of a domain name for
another absent a showing of bad faith intent to profit
from such registration or maintenance of the domain
name.
''(iv) If a registrar, registry, or other
registration authority takes an action described under
clause (ii) based on a knowing and material
misrepresentation by any person that a domain name is
identical to, confusingly similar to, or dilutive of a
mark registered on the Principal Register of the United
States Patent and Trademark Office, such person shall
be liable for any damages, including costs and
attorney's fees, incurred by the domain name registrant
as a result of such action. The court may also grant
injunctive relief to the domain name registrant,
including the reactivation of the domain name or the
transfer of the domain name to the domain name
registrant.''.

SEC. 6. DEFINITIONS.

Section 45 of the Trademark Act of 1946 (15 U.S.C. 1127) is amended
by inserting after the undesignated paragraph defining the term
''counterfeit'' the following:
''The term 'Internet' has the meaning given that term in
section 230(f)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C.
230(f)(1)).
''The term 'domain name' means any alphanumeric designation
which is registered with or assigned by any domain name
registrar, domain name registry, or other domain name
registration authority as part of an electronic address on the
Internet.''.

SEC. 7. SAVINGS CLAUSE.

Nothing in this Act shall affect any defense available to a
defendant under the Trademark Act of 1946 (including any defense under
section 43(c)(4) of such Act or relating to fair use) or a person's
right of free speech or expression under the first amendment of the
United States Constitution.

SEC. 8. SEVERABILITY.

If any provision of this Act, an amendment made by this Act, or the
application of such provision or amendment to any person or
circumstances is held to be unconstitutional, the remainder of this
Act, the amendments made by this Act, and the application of the
provisions of such to any person or circumstance shall not be affected
thereby.

SEC. 9. EFFECTIVE DATE.

This Act shall apply to all domain names registered before, on, or
after the date of enactment of this Act, except that statutory damages
under section 35(d) of the Trademark Act of 1946 (15 U.S.C. 1117), as
added by section 4 of this Act, shall not be available with respect to
the registration, trafficking, or use of a domain name that occurs
before the date of enactment of this Act.
Student:
(Sec. 3) Authorizes a court to order the forfeiture or cancellation of the domain name or its transfer to the mark owner.
Prescribes conditions for an in rem civil action, in addition to any other action, against a domain name by a mark owner. Limits remedies in an in rem action to a court order for the forfeiture or cancellation of the domain name or its transfer to the mark owner.
(Sec. 4) Provides for statutory damages in an amount of at least $1,000 and up to $100,000 per domain name, as the court considers just. Requires the court to remit statutory damages if an infringer believed with reasonable grounds that use of the domain name was fair or otherwise lawful.
(Sec. 5) Shields from liability for monetary relief, regardless of whether the domain name is finally determined to infringe or dilute the mark in question, any domain name registrar, registry, or other registration authority that refuses to register, removes from registration, transfers, temporarily disables, or permanently cancels a domain name: (1) in compliance with a court order; or (2) in the implementation of a reasonable policy prohibiting the registration of a domain name identical to, confusingly similar to, or dilutive of another's mark registered on the Principal Registry of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. Provides that if a registration authority takes such action based on a knowing and material misrepresentation by any person that a domain name is identical to, confusingly similar to, or dilutive of a another's registered mark, such person shall be liable for damages incurred by the domain name registrant and the court may grant injunctive relief to such registrant.
Shields a registrar, registry, or other registration authority from liability for damages for the registration or maintenance of a domain name for another, unless there is a showing of bad faith intent to profit from such registration or maintenance of the domain name.