Question:
Based on the premise "This approach also would reduce states' administrative burdens and obligations.", can we conclude that "The approach would reduce state burdens and obligations."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
yes

Question: Sentence A: A succession of weak and decadent emperors saw the Roman Empire fall gradually into decline and anarchy.

Sentence B: The fall of the Roman Empire was gradual, and was the result of poor leadership.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Question: This approach was documented and can be located at //www.epa.gov/otaq/hdmodels.htm.
You can find the details of the approach at www.epa.gov/otaq/hdmodels.htm.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Problem: Here is a premise:
Although these advances promise to streamline federal operations and improve the delivery of federal services, they also expose these activities to greater risks.

Here is a hypothesis:
These advances will reduce the exposure of federal operations to greater risk.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Sentence 1: Researchers have found significant associations using both types of studies.

Sentence 2: Both types of studies are not equal when it comes to a measure of bias.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Premise:
"He is easily distracted the critic John Leonard remarked in an appreciative review of Culture and Imperialism , answering too many fire alarms, sometimes to pour on more petrol."
Hypothesis: He responds to too many fire alarms and occasionally pours on more petrol, says John Leonard.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
yes