Problem: Here is a premise:
No tree rustled.

Here is a hypothesis:
There weren't any trees rustling.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Sentence 1: The editorial concluded, He smoked but didn't inhale.

Sentence 2: He smoked to pass the time and not due to enjoying the taste.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question:
The possibility had to be confirmed, or eliminated."

Does it follow that "It was likely that there was no possibility, but it had to be checked anyway. "?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
it is not possible to tell

Q: If The magazine can't compete with monthlies either., can we say that "The monthlies are way better than the magazine."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A: yes

Premise:
"Ancient glaciers eroded many of the valleys, creating space for the lakes as they melted at the end of the last Ice Age, approximately 8,000 b.c."
Hypothesis: The last ice age ended approximately 10,000 years ago.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

yes

Sentence 1: Sub-aquatic enthusiasts are in luck in along the Garajau coastline one of Europe's first underwater nature reserves was created.

Sentence 2: The Garajou coastline features one of Europe's first underwater nature reserve.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer:
yes