Question:
Based on the premise "However, if the asset that is transferred was classified as general PP and E for the transferring entity but stewardship PP and E for the recipient entity, it is recognized as a transfer-out (a negative other financing source) of capitalized assets by the transferring entity.", can we conclude that "The entity hopes that their assets are never transferred. "? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
it is not possible to tell

Question: Sentence A: I'm sorry to say that you have not reached the lower limit.

Sentence B: I am sorry, but I must tell you, that you have not reached the lower limit.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Question: Grisham, it is clear, wants nothing to stand in the way of his central point--that a man who surrenders all his worldly possessions to defend the homeless is a hero.
Grisham is trying to elevate the idea of the selfish man as the ultimate hero.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Problem: Here is a premise:
I need to be my own spin doctor.

Here is a hypothesis:
I need to be a spin doctor for myself.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Sentence 1: The 19th-century restorations of Viollet-le-Duc have maintained the church's majestic harmony.

Sentence 2: Viollet-le-Duc is a church that also served as a homeless shelter.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Premise:
"( In authentic religion, doesn't it take Kierkegaard's leap of faith?"
Hypothesis: In authentic religion, doesn't it take Schrodinger's cat?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
no