In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: insult and non-insult. Insult is any lanugage or act that is disrespectful or scornfully abusive.

[EX Q]: Comment: Right. Rampant sexism and men desiring to control women's bodies are reasons to stay.
[EX A]: Non-insult

[EX Q]: Comment: I'm done responding to you. You are an idiot who has no fricken clue!!!!
[EX A]: Insult

[EX Q]: Comment: "the same month two men inspired by the Islamic State killed two Canadian Forces soldiers."

We are really following the US. In its official report on 9-11 there were several possible causes for 9-11 considered. One was not retaliation even though the US had been involved in attacking Muslims since at least 1947 in Palestine.

And now Canada, killing Muslims in Afghanistan since 2002, does not mention retaliation as a reason for the killing of Canadian soldiers. The attack on Parliament Hill was an even more obvious case of retaliation. Parliament Hill was where our troops were ordered to kill in Afghanistan. Clearly retaliation.

Instead the killing of Canadian soldiers "was inspired by the Islamic State." How American that statement is.
[EX A]:
Non-insult