Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.

[EX Q]: How much information do you need? A woman is going to get her mail, gets shot, sues the shooter. The comments here are probably like the ones the attorneys will offer up. "He didn't see her, it was an accident, he didn't know." What's missing so far is her negligence in being where she was if she heard shooting. That'll be for the defendant's attorney to bring up.
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: In the Gulag in Stalin's time not only were prisoners kept ten years past their release date but many were executed by firing squad due to clerical errors. Since most of those in the camps were innocent anyway it didn't really matter.
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: I believe this shooter is a guy who prides himself as being a lady's man, and recently another man made a pass at him, and this is his revenge against the gay community. Anyone can call 9-1-1 and claim this event was in the name of ISIS. I think the motive for this runs much deeper than the easy go-to motive of Islamic terrorism.
This individual strikes me as a person struggling with his sexuality, much like the UC Santa Barbara college shooter did.
[EX A]:
Yes