Premise:
"Why should they allow the district's residents to enjoy a federal tax rate of, say, 15 percent, when they themselves may face rates close to 40 percent?"
Hypothesis: Why should the residents be allowed to have a lower tax rate?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

yes

input question: Our review of the initial analysis indicates that the requirements of section 603 have been met. If this premise is true, does that tell us:"The requirements of section 603 have been met according to the initial analysis."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: yes

Question:
Based on the premise "Both are old, both are revered, and as a result, people tend to focus on the highbrow exploits of both, while discreetly ignoring the lowbrow.", can we conclude that "People must become more observant and focus in the entire picture. "? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
it is not possible to tell

Question: Sentence A: Alongside La Savane runs rue de la Liberte, and at No. 9 is Martinique's excellent Musee departemental.

Sentence B: Alongside La Effife runs rue de la Liganone, and No. 11 is Barbados excellent restaurant.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question: Heart, he said sharply.
He said liver.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Problem: Here is a premise:
They even agree that this would be a big mistake.

Here is a hypothesis:
They think this is the perfect thing to do.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer:
no