[QUESTION] Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "A woman and children with their ice cream cones."
Hypothesis: "The people are eating ice-cream."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
People can refer to a woman and the children with their ice cream cones.
The answer is yes.

Q: Premise: "A man and woman are walking three dogs down a trail by the river."
Hypothesis: "A couple is walking their dogs in a dog park."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
A: Walking down a trail by the river does not mean walking in a dog park.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

QUESTION: Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "This individual in a white lab suit is studying some sort of translucent scan."
Hypothesis: "A doctor is looking at an x-ray."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell

Let's solve it slowly: We didn't know the person in a lab coat is a doctor and we didn't know the translucent scan was an xray.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

[QUESTION] Premise: "Deli man slicing meat thin and weighing the sliced pieces."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A deli man is working." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A deli man who is slicing and weighing meat is working.
The answer is yes.

Q: Can we conclude from "A little boy at a lake watching a duck." that "The duck is talking to the hamster."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
A: I doubt the duck is talking to a hamster while a boy watches.
The answer is no.

[QUESTION] Premise: "Two dogs holding red balls in their mouth."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "Running in the snow." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A dog sleeping on a bed in front of a fireplace.
The answer is no.