Categorize the comment on the basis of severe toxicity. If the comment is severely toxic output Yes, otherwise output No.
--------
Question: BJ, it's funny but you and I never say that the Koch Bros. don't understand their own interests. It's always the less empowered groups that are lectured re: their own interests. You can dance around your problem- that the majority of Portlanders reject New Urbanist policies- but it still exists.

The majority of Portlanders like SFH, hence Novick's abysmal approval ratings.

I know that you are not anti-democratic, so the lack of democratic support for increased density must bother you. Fact is, New Urbansim is co-opted by those who stand to make money off greenwashing & real estate. It can and will be rejected at the polls.

Answer: No

Question: Oh, I don't know if Trump's lying is necessarily 'pathological"... Maybe, I guess.

Answer: No

Question: Sounds like the whole neighborhood is filled with idiots. "Everyone's pet moose?!" Is she out of her ever loving mind? Regardless, if you set aside the history of the "pet" and were confronted with a charging moose (2 year old moose are NOT small!) and toddlers in the area, what would you do? Most of us would protect the kids. Ironically, if they hadn't shot the moose and one of the children had been hurt, there would be tons of comments asking why they didn't protect the kids and just shoot the damn thing.

Answer:
Yes