TASK DEFINITION: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.
PROBLEM: Comment: State Department defends US vote against death penalty ban at the UN
how about this:
US Votes Against UN Ban On Death Penalty For Homosexuality
Death for being a homosexual.
Let's do the same...........death for being Christian/Muslim. Fair?
Hell YES!

SOLUTION: Identity-attack

PROBLEM: Comment: Hmmmmm.
Let me see. Someone to the south of us was just judged best suited for the task of the presidency solely because of his business background.
And he was celebrated during the campaign because he didn't "come across as "wishy washy."
That ain't working out too well.
Maybe we should apply some other criteria when selecting these guys.
To quote Betrand Russell:
"The trouble with the world is that the stupid are cocksure and the intelligent are full of doubt."

SOLUTION: Non-identity-attack

PROBLEM: Comment: Based on the hacking of the DNC, etc. by SOMEONE with an agenda, the question is not IF they've also got something on Trump, but WHAT. They're just holding on to it for a more opportune time. How hard would it be to hack into his legal activity, his financial activity, his "social" activity, his emails outlining his shady business practices. It's all spread all over in a variety of private hands.

Blackmail central, baby: "Dear Mr. President. We're going to annex the rest of the Ukraine and you won't say a thing unless you want your financial records and these two videos of you doing you-know-what released to the public." Easy decision for someone of his morals.

SOLUTION:
Non-identity-attack