In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Comment: Speaking of being "civil" here. Dear Tina, "I have a new nickname for your derriere - "JACK".
Sexual-explicit

Comment: The malignant narcissist makes another trip for selfies and the chance to make more mindless political statements. Also another opportunity to sell his newest $40 caps made in China
Non-sexual-explicit

Comment: You do realize that the BC Liberals aren't "Liberal at all. They are Reform/Social Credit. They hired a bunch of former Harperites to run the campaign ... they also had WAC Bennett's grandson on the bus with Christy during the whole campaign.

Another example of the phony crock that is the BC Fiberals. They can't even represent themselves via a proper namesake. Why people vote for their corrupt ways is anybody's guess. Maybe now they can take out the big money from these campaigns. These phony Liberals would be lost without that.
Non-sexual-explicit