Q: Michelle, We have a reconciling item between SAP Account 0530-10220019 Outflow Clearing and the actual bank balance with Citibank New York 40781075 in the amount of $5,346.46. On 10-26-01 your forwarded to Treasury Wire Transfer Requests as follows: Payee Amount Curr US Amount Denton Wilde Sapte Tokyo $492,120 JPY $4,024.20 Rajah and Tann $2,425.65 SGD $1,332.26 It appears that these two (2) Wire Transfer Requests have not been forwarded to A/P to record the expense. Please arrange to forward the appropriate documentation to A/P during November 2001. Stacey Lee Burnett
Propose a subject line
A: Co 0530 CINY 40781075 $5,356.46 FX Funding
IN: As of today May 9, 2001 Bammel has working gas of approximately 20.3 TBTU. Economics are favorable to keep injecting. I estimate that injections will average around 1TBTU per week through May 31, 2001 which would result in another 3+ TBTU beibng injected. At the current pricing level this means that AEP would owe Enron somewhere around $98 million. Is this something Accounting should be working into the AEP settlement to pay Enron on June 1, 2001? Should AEP be notified of the volume and approximate value. Is there anything that needs to be done contractually other than the original agrrement to facilitate this transaction? I just wanted to make sure everyone is aware! Please let me know your thoughts.

Generate a subject line.

OUT: Bammel Working Gas Sale To AEP
IN: This is an email
This is a notice to inform you that the server where your Outlook mailbox resides is scheduled for an outage tonight. Your mailbox will be temporarily unavailable starting anytime after 11pm and may continue to be unavailable until 1 a.m., when all server maintenance work have been completed. Outlook Web Access (OWA) will also be unavailable during this time. Blackberry users: Message delivery may be delayed for a few minutes. If you have any questions, please call the Resolution Center at x31411.

What is the subject?

OUT: CORRECTION: Outlook Outage - Friday, December 28, 2001
QUESTION: The drafts for Master Physical Agreements have been completed, and await Stacy's review. To the Susan's: I have been instructed to send Forest Oil via e-mail to the customer. Are you doing same? I will coordinate with you to send Energen with your agreement when ready.
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: Forest Oil / Energen Resources
John, Please find attached the resume of Angie Zeman, who is an analyst working a rotation in East Gas Logistics. She is an outstanding perfromer and is interested in pursuing opportunities in London. Who is the best person in your organization to communicate her interest and my recommendation? Thanks.
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: Angie's Resume
Eric, We need to get the physical gas delivery issue resolved. TW is scheduled to deliver to ECS which was contracted with ENA for a fixed price for each of the stations ( [Bisti & Bloomfield or Kachina] and Gallup ). The total volume for Dec.01 according to TW and my best determination at this time is 342,560 MMBtu which ENA has not scheduled reportedly because they do not have a counter-party that will transact. This gas volume and the resulting cash flow into ECS Compression Co. LLC is a large portion of the monthly cash flow required to fund the billing expenses. Gallup Sta. - 81,605 mmbtu's (Annual Charge Conversion) appears to be a $2.35/mmbtu price for this year 25,521 mmbtu's (Compression Service Charge) appears to be a $2.44/mmbtu price for the term 107,126 mmbtu's for the month with a resulting $2.37144/mmbtu blended price Bloomfield - 110,240 mmbtu's (Compression Service Charge for Oct. power billed in Nov. 01) Bisti - 125,194 mmbtu's (Compression Service Charge for Oct. power billed in Nov. 01) 342,560 mmbtu's for the month of Dec. to ECS I'm not 100% sure of the pricing on these transactions but possibly with your information and Gerald Nemec's input we can determine and confirm. TK Lohman at TW called with a buyer for the Dec. 01 ECS gas. Scott Walker w/ Richardson Products 817 810 9385 frequently buys TW's operational gas that is sold intra month. The most direct method of handling the gas is to have ENA sell the gas & the proceeds directly flow back to ECS (if that is possible). ECS doesn't want the gas sale to roll into the ENA bankruptcy process. Otherwise ENA would need to assign ECS the ability to sell the gas directly but ECS would then need to execute a TW Pooling Agreement (or something) and there may be issues with ECS marketing gas directly. Let me know what blanks you can fill in. mk
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer:
TW - Physical Gas Delivery for Dec.01