Question:
Based on the premise "The Bastille was stormed the next day.", can we conclude that "The Bastille was stormed the following day. "? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
yes

Question: Sentence A: 9 efficiency/energy intensity of the electric power industry

Sentence B: Performance figures of the water industry.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question: He was flying to a wedding--a more commendable pursuit than the one that killed Michael, but nothing like the war that killed Uncle Joe.
Him flying to the wedding showed good intent despite his shortcomings.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Problem: Here is a premise:
Minimum reporting shall consist of the

Here is a hypothesis:
Minimum reporting will consist of.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Sentence 1: As noted earlier, the material needed for multiple boiler installations is generally not reduced significantly over the projects if they were installed separately.

Sentence 2: The boiler installations can be done as separate projects.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: yes

Premise:
"yeah you sure did what grade did you teach or"
Hypothesis: What grade did you teach for.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
yes