Question:
Based on the premise "Beyond the main temple complex, Karnak stretches out over the landscape as far as the eye can see, but many of the other remains are more difficult to identify.", can we conclude that "Most of the remains are more difficult to identify because they have been subject to more severe damages over time."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
it is not possible to tell

Question: Sentence A: Following the expansion of the airport, the island entered the big league of international holiday resorts.

Sentence B: The island entered a decline after expanding the airport.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question: The newest curators-in-your-pocket are lightweight CD-ROM based systems on which visitors can punch in the numbers on wall labels, accessing commentary on whatever interests them.
The visitors have to pay a fee in order to use the system.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Problem: Here is a premise:
As a society we may have to face facts.

Here is a hypothesis:
Society has a hard time facing facts.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Sentence 1: ('We're going to steal the Internet's thunder!

Sentence 2: We're going to steal the show from the Internet!
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: yes

Premise:
"The result is a patois baffling to anyone not brought up on St. Barts."
Hypothesis: The result is not well undestood by people that are not from St. Barts.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
yes