Categorize the comment on the basis of severe toxicity. If the comment is severely toxic output Yes, otherwise output No.

[Q]: If you can't spell the word 'appetizing' correctly, you can't claim to have gourmet taste. Soul food is for the hard workers, the country kin, and people who don't need their ass kissed by a waitress.
[A]: Yes

[Q]: No, Junior. It's in print and you still cant follow. I never asked you for examples, that is someone else. I pointed out you bias. You then deflected, and now humiliate yourself in public unable to follow a friggin post that's IN PRINT. Junior, if you're not on drugs, get help.
[A]: Yes

[Q]: Not sure why WWeek.com has to choose between only one perspective versus another, nor any need to read anything describing itself as a "news" periodical if it isn't going to give me any *new* info, views, ideas, inspiration, concerns..... that is, more awareness of new data than my same me-views, only [**yawn**], on as much as possible.

Except about baseball.
[A]:
No