I hope you are all having a nice weekend. With everything going on these days, I'm not sure if you have someone earmarked for taking over the responsibility for gas risk. I would like to let you know I would like to perform that function in addition to my regular responsibilities. Thanks,
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: gas risk
Greg, Below are a list of economists that we may want to consider for the Management Conference. You may have thoughts or insights on one or more of them. I've looked into Robert Rubins, but he is not accepting speaking engagements at the present time. Of those listed below, I like Todd Buchholz, William Freund, Ron Insana and Paul Volcker. (I really like Louis Rukeyser, but he's very expensive.) I welcome your input on this. I'm going to begin checking availability on those I mentioned tomorrow. Regards,
Answer: Economists for the Management Conference
Here is an email: Stephanie and Sara - We currently have several deals on the books with National Energy Group, Inc. that we confirmed under omnibus confirms. The initial two deals that we did with them, TAGG numbers QY8453 and QY9133, required independent amounts and had the credit language attached. I have attached those annexes below. We have since executed the following trades: VH0606 VH0931 VH0969 VH0982 VT5854 VT5861 Our positions with this counterparty have gone deep in the money to them, and they have asked us to send them back the collateral. While I am not thrilled about doing this, I understand that this is a commercial issue and we probably need to do this to be responsive to the customer. If you hadn't guessed by now, this is a Lagrasta customer, so I am getting the requisite incentive from Fred to get this done. In concert with the return of their collateral, I want to send them a document that allows us to call for margin again if their positions start moving back in ENA's favor. I want to be able to call them if their position moves any less than $3 million in their favor. Right now, the positions are over $6 MM in National Energy Group's favor; I want to call them if that exposure changes to anything less than $3 MM in their favor. This would still give us some "cushion". What do we need to do to make this happen? JRW
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: National Energy Group, Inc.
Q: Enron Corporation: We would like to welcome you to www.kudlow.com. Either today or tomorrow you will receive an email stating there is a new Kudlow Commentary posted. Simply click on the link, type in your email address and password "kudlow" to view and download Larry Kudlow's latest column. If you wish to change your password, simply click on "my profile" once you have logged in. Please be sure to check out all the other features of our website. We welcome your questions and comments. Thank you,
Propose a subject line
A: KUDLOW.COM
IN: When: Monday, November 05, 2001 1:00 PM-2:00 PM (GMT-06:00) Central Time (US & Canada). Where: TBD *~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~* Please make sure to accept this invitation if you are interested in the class. Thank You

Generate a subject line.

OUT: OPtions class with Iris Mack
IN: This is an email
Dave, It was great getting a chance to finanlly meet the other night. Hope you enjoyed dinner. Since then, I've been thinking abt some of our conversation re: the PBR. I have a quick question - why wouldn't you under withdraw in Feb and over withdraw in Mar if Mar is currently higher than Feb. You could lock this in by buying Mar forward. Also, what happens if you withdraw in Mar and the Summer peaks higher than what you withdrew at? How is this accounted for? I'll talk to you after you get back from Houston. Kevin

What is the subject?

OUT:
What's up?