In this task, you will be shown a sentence, and you should determine whether it is overruling or non-overruling. In law, an overruling sentence is a statement that nullifies a previous case decision as a precedent by a constitutionally valid statute or a decision by the same or higher ranking court which establishes a different rule on the point of law involved. Classify your answers into overruling or non-overruling

Ex Input:
to the extent that people v. milton, supra, 55 cal.app.4th 365, people v. allen, supra, 53 cal.app.4th 1127, people v. sanders, supra, 52 cal.app.4th 175, people v. robles, supra, 51 cal.app.4th 627, people v. ervin, supra, 50 cal.app.4th 259, people v. holloway (1996) 47 cal.app.4th 1757 [ 55 cal.rptr.2d 547], people v. howard (1996) 47 cal.app.4th 1526 [ 55 cal.rptr.2d 520], and people v. ramos (1996) 47 cal.app.4th 432 [ 55 cal.rptr.2d 1] are inconsistent with the views expressed in this opinion, they are disapproved.

Ex Output:
overruling

Ex Input:
reilly, judge ramsey county district courtfile no. 62-cr-17-1420 lori swanson, attorney general, st. paul, minnesota; and john choi, ramsey county attorney, thomas r. ragatz, assistant county attorney, st. paul, minnesota (for respondent) cathryn middlebrook, chief appellate public defender, john donovan, assistant public defender, st. paul, minnesota (for appellant) considered and decided by bjorkman, presiding judge; larkin, judge; and reilly, judge.

Ex Output:
non-overruling

Ex Input:
we disapprove of jensen construction co. v. dallas county, 920 s.w.2d 761 (tex.app.-dallas 1996, writ denied), to the extent that it holds otherwise.

Ex Output:
overruling