Premise:
"A second adjustment is conducted as part of the mortality, morbidity, and visibility valuation procedures to incorporate the effect of changes in income over time on WTP."
Hypothesis: No adjustments can be made when regarding mortality procedures.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

no

input question: right yeah i've got a lot of folks that i've worked with like that as well If this premise is true, does that tell us:"A lot of the people that I work with like that too."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: yes

Question:
Based on the premise "Cap in, powder in, plug in, ball in, seal it in, ram it down.", can we conclude that "If they missed a step it would not function properly."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
it is not possible to tell

Question: Sentence A: By the end of that one-hour lunch, he had listed off at least 20 projects - not the least of which was a new shelter -- and was sitting there waiting for me to respond.

Sentence B: At the conclusion of the hour long meal, he had mentioned around 20 projects including a new shelter and patiently expected me to reply.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Question: but i didn't want to do it huh-uh i don't think that i could sit on a jury and be part of sentencing someone to death
I couldn't sit on a jury and help sentence someone to death.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Problem: Here is a premise:
The commentariat repeats its long-held opinion that Clinton's claim of executive privilege is bunk.

Here is a hypothesis:
The commentariat thinks that most Americans will agree that Clinton should not get executive privilege.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer:
it is not possible to tell