TASK DEFINITION: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.
PROBLEM: Comment: Oh, those 'naughty' BC Liberals! First, Christy shrugs and says, "The BC voters don't care corrupt we are.", then disappears until the whole thing blows over (she hopes). Then her deputy crime boss, Rich Coleman comes out and throws their donors under the bus. If that wasn't bad enough, Suzanne Anton, Attorney General, stands up in QP and throws their lobbyists under the bus. Who's next?

SOLUTION: Non-identity-attack

PROBLEM: Comment: I asked Jesus and he said that no matter what the baker does, he knows that the baker hates gays in his heart.
Jesus thinks the baker should stop being a little baby and make the cake.

Jack Philips has actually made many cakes for gay weddings, he just did not know it. No one is under obligation to say, "by the way, this is for a gay wedding."

SOLUTION: Identity-attack

PROBLEM: Comment: I am reminded of Martin Luther King's "Letter From A Birmingham Jail". I am particularly reminded of this paragraph:

We know through painful experience that freedom is never voluntarily given by the oppressor; it must be demanded by the oppressed. Frankly, I have yet to engage in a direct action campaign that was "well timed" in the view of those who have not suffered unduly from the disease of segregation. For years now I have heard the word "Wait!" It rings in the ear of every Negro with piercing familiarity. This "Wait" has almost always meant "Never." We must come to see, with one of our distinguished jurists, that "justice too long delayed is justice denied."

Substitute "homosexual" for "Negro", and it rings true in this situation.

SOLUTION:
Identity-attack