Problem: Here is a premise:
uh and we're gonna try to teach him good values because you know when when when they get to upper level school and they start teaching well hey if you can play football or basketball that's what's important not if you can read or write or do or understand understand some science you know i mean give me a break that's that's that's bogus

Here is a hypothesis:
I would like my kids to play football or basketball.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Sentence 1: For one thing, Earth in the Balance was written a long time ago, and we may suppose that its author has learned a lot since then.

Sentence 2: We can be sure the creator of the book is much smarter now than they were when they wrote the book.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question:
9 We reported that many experienced claims-processing staff are expected to retire and that VBA's training and recruitment programs may not be adequate to ensure a sufficient workforce of competent claims processors.

Does it follow that "We don't think VBA's training is very good."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
it is not possible to tell

Q: If The second version, posed by a Reuters correspondent, was whether Bush thought rumors of his cocaine use were being planted., can we say that "A Reuters correspondent suspected Bush of using cocaine, but it was never proved."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A: it is not possible to tell

Premise:
"so i i've got to agree with that"
Hypothesis: I agree with that.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

yes

Sentence 1: yeah that has its plusses for sure

Sentence 2: The race car definitely have its pluses.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer:
it is not possible to tell