QUESTION: Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "A brown dog lunges for a yellow toy."
Hypothesis: "A dog is playing with its favorite yellow toy."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell

Let's solve it slowly: A dog lunges for a toy does not imply the toy is the dogs favorite.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

[QUESTION] Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "Two people converse on a park bench in the background of a box of memorabilia for sale."
Hypothesis: "The men are drinking scotch at a strip club."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
If two people drink at a strip club they can't be conversing on a park bench.
The answer is no.

Q: Can we conclude from "Two men are on a mechanical lift and inspect damages on a wall." that "Two men are inspecting damage from the flood."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
A: Two men inspecting damages does not necessarily imply that the damages are from the flood.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

QUESTION: Given the sentence "A man plays frisbee with his dog." can we conclude that "The man and dog are sitting on a bench."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Let's solve it slowly: One cannot ply Frisbee and be sitting on a bench simultaneously.
The answer is no.

[QUESTION] Can we conclude from "White dog outside with two people in background." that "The dog is playing with people."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
The dog outside with two people does not imply it is playing with people.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

Q: Premise: "A surfer jumps out of the water."
Hypothesis: "The surfer dives under the water."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
A:
A surfer cannot both dive and jump out of the water simultaneously.
The answer is no.