Question:
Based on the premise "Both the observation and the complaint are virtually as old as 20 th -century cultural criticism itself.", can we conclude that "The observation is new and hasn't been made before."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
no

Question: Sentence A: Tanenhaus accuses Chambers of having inadvertently instigated McCarthyism, and shows us Chambers' paranoia, his introversion, his sententiousness (Stephen Koch, the Wall Street Journal ). (Also, see Slate's mildly critical review by Ann Douglas.)

Sentence B: Tanehaus accuses Chambers of instigating McCarythism due to his paranoia and introversion.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Question: Therefore, client funds were deposited into interest-free attorney trust accounts.
Client funds were deposited into the trust accounts.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Problem: Here is a premise:
Poet Craig Raine argued that Lorenz Hart was a better lyricist than Dylan.

Here is a hypothesis:
There is some debate over whether Hart or Dylan are a better lyricist.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Sentence 1: Breed Cayuga

Sentence 2: Mating Cayuga
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: yes

Premise:
"You have wisdom."
Hypothesis: You have honor.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
it is not possible to tell