Q: If You see, the rational expectations challenge to Keynesian economics was half- It did not build a workable new structure for macroeconomic theory and policy, but it did seriously damage the old structure., can we say that "It was a challenge to Keynesian economics but did not seriously damage the theory."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A: yes

Premise:
"and uh yeah you know i mean it's not uh i don't think Dallas is considered uh a a real bad place for for air pollution but you you can tell you can tell the differences in the days when it's when the haze is kind of yellowish gray instead of just being a a foggy misty color"
Hypothesis: Dallas's air can take on a yellowish gray color due to pollution.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

yes

input question: That's just it. If this premise is true, does that tell us:"That is not it."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: no

Question:
Based on the premise "The good news is that across many trials, the interventions being delivered seem to work.", can we conclude that "The interventions seem to work and made huge differences in the community."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
it is not possible to tell

Question: Sentence A: we're in uh as i said a small town in Indiana and it's a WASP community with a student body of five hundred in the high school so the setting is very different than it would be in

Sentence B: The high school has a thousand students from the town.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question: Sentence A: They're too different.

Sentence B: They are not similar enough for this task.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer:
it is not possible to tell