Problem: For example, by suggesting that the Minister of Labour uses parliamentary immunity to take an unfair action against a person, he is implying that if he spoke outside the House of Commons the Minister of Labour would be subject to some kind of civil suit, so he is imputing motives to the Minister of Labour.

Based on the paragraph above can we conclude that "The Minister of Labour can be sued."?

A: Yes

Problem: I think the IMF has got a role in the world, but I don't want to see the IMF out there as a way to say to world bankers, if you make a bad loan, we'll bail you out. It needs to be available for emergency situations. I thought the President did the right thing with Mexico and was very strongly supportive of the administration in Mexico.

Based on the paragraph above can we conclude that "The Mexican government was not pleased with the Presidents decision."?

A: It's impossible to say

Problem: (2) The committee designated or established for the purpose of subsection (1) shall, as soon as practicable, undertake a comprehensive review of the provisions and operation of this Act and, shall within five yeas after the review is undertaken, submit a report to the House of Commons.''

Based on the paragraph above can we conclude that "The act has no operation."?

A:
No