Question:
Based on the premise "In a Memo to National Reporters after the debate, Bradley's campaign drove home the THE BRADLEY PLAN IS SUPPORT FOR HEALTH INSURANCE, NOT 'VOUCHERS.", can we conclude that "Bradley's plan of support for health insurance is not for vouchers, but it is being argued that the plan is not what Bradley claims it to be in the debates. "? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
it is not possible to tell

Question:
Based on the premise "There are, however, some limitations.", can we conclude that "There are some limitations"? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
yes

Question:
Based on the premise "Not many causes are as worthwhile.", can we conclude that "Most causes are a waste of a plaintiff's time."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
it is not possible to tell