Generate an explanation for the given claim using the provided supporting material from the paragraph. Please consider the following points while generating an output. 1) The claim will always have supporting proof in the paragraph, and the paragraph will have a clear point of view supporting the claim. 2) There can be instances where direct correlation to the claim is not available. Make use of the sentences in the paragraph to provide a corresponding output supporting the claim. 3) The explanation should be at least one and at most twelve sentences long.

Input: Consider Input: Paragraph: The significant costs of both drugs were mentioned. Nice job. Good job describing the benefits reported in the two drug studies. The two papers present a bewildering array of statistics. This story did a nice job distilling the information into a couple of very understandable sentences. Good job explaining signifcant potential harms of both drugs something competitors didn't do at all. Nice job, including linking (in the online version) to the papers in the New England Journal of Medicine. No disease-mongering of melanoma. Several independent sources cited. The story adequately explained the comparisons between both new drugs and the older dacarbazine chemo drug. Vemurafenib was described as experimental and as "expected to be approved by the FDA within a few months." Ipilimumab was explained to be approved in March and already on the market. The relative novelty of both drugs was well explained. It's clear that the story did not rely on a news release. Claim: Drugs Show Promise Slowing Advanced Melanoma

Output: The story made strong, clear attempts to report in a restrained manner, using terms/phrases such as: "notable progress" "do not cure" "might add two to several moths to expected lifespans" "To be sure, more than half of patients with metastatic melanoma would not be helped all that much by either drug." Stories about cancer perhaps especially melanoma because of its treatment challenges should balance promise with realistic context. This story did a better job of that than the competitors' efforts we reviewed.

Input: Consider Input: Paragraph: Speaking at a White House coronavirus briefing, Trump said he would unveil a new advisory group next week that would focus on the process of economic opening. The president, who faced criticism for playing down the threat from the virus in its early stages, has chafed at the devastating economic impact of the strict social distancing measures his administration has recommended. The guidelines are set to stay in place through the end of April. The president will then have to decide whether to extend them or start encouraging people to go back to work and a more normal way of life. "I'm going to have to make a decision, and I ... hope to God that it's the right decision," Trump said. "It's the biggest decision I've ever had to make." Trump said the facts would determine the next move, though he reiterated his desire to re-open the economy. Asked what metrics he would use to make his judgment, he pointed at his forehead: "The metrics right here, that's my metrics." Trump suggested the number of new infections was flattening and the death toll would be lower than initial projections of more than 100,000. He said he would announce the members of the new advisory council possibly on Tuesday. Some state governors will be appointed. Trump said the aggressive social distancing and stay-at-home measures taken to combat the coronavirus were showing signs of success, and situations in hot spots such as New Orleans, Louisiana, and Detroit, Michigan, were stabilizing. U.S. deaths from the virus topped 18,100 on Friday, according to a Reuters tally. But administration officials cautioned it was still too early to ease restrictions, and said the faithful should not gather in churches on the Easter Sunday holiday. "We know it's difficult in this time of year in particular to avoid gatherings of more than 10, but we're grateful that so many churches, synagogues and places of worship have done just that," Vice President Mike Pence said, urging worshipers "to continue to heed the guidelines." New U.S. government figures show coronavirus infections will spike during the summer if stay-at-home orders are lifted after 30 days as planned, according to projections first reported by the New York Times and confirmed by a Department of Homeland Security official. If shelter-in-place orders are lifted after 30 days, the death toll is estimated to reach 200,000, according to the projections, obtained from DHS and the Department of Health and Human Services. Trump said at the briefing that he and his advisers have not seen the new projections. Trump said he was getting fewer calls from governors urgently seeking equipment and help. "We're in great shape with ventilators, we're in great shape with protective clothing, we have additional planeloads coming in. But we're not getting any calls from governors at this moment," he said. Dr. Deborah Birx, the coordinator of the White House task force on the coronavirus, said the United States was starting to flatten the curve the way Italy did, with a lot of the success coming from progress in New York City. Officials have pointed to declining rates of coronavirus hospitalizations and need for intensive care in hard-hit New York as signs that social distancing measures are paying off. "But as encouraging as they are, we have not reached the peak. And so every day we need to continue to do what we did yesterday, and the week before and the week before that because that's what in the end is going to take us across the peak and down the other side," Birx said. Claim: Using his own 'metrics,' Trump says ending U.S. shutdown is biggest decision yet.

Output: President Donald Trump said on Friday he faced his biggest decision yet with regard to when to re-open the U.S. economy from its coronavirus shutdown and pledged to listen to health experts when making that determination.

Input: Consider Input: Paragraph: Takeaways from the prime-time event: WARREN, CASTRO LEAD THE WAY Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren dominated the debate's opening moments, calling for systemic change to the nation's economy and the end to the private insurance system. Warren was the highest-polling candidate on stage and NBC moderators repeatedly tried to draw her rivals into challenging her liberal policies. But they largely passed on those opportunities, even when Warren was virtually alone in her stance on overhauling the health care industry. Former Housing and Urban Development Secretary Julian Castro, who has struggled for months to break through in the crowded field, asserted himself as a leader on immigration, an issue sure to be at the forefront of the general election campaign against President Donald Trump. He challenged his rivals to join him in rewriting immigration laws so the mere illegal entry into the United States would no longer be a federal crime. The question is whether Warren and Castro's performances still stand out after night two of the Democratic debate on Thursday, when former Vice President Joe Biden and nine other candidates take the stage. ___ WHOSE ECONOMY IS IT ANYWAY? The debate kicked off with moderator Savannah Guthrie asking Warren if her many ambitious plans free college, universal child care and health care would hurt a booming economy. "Who is this economy really working for?" Warren replied. "It's doing great for a thinner and thinner slice at the top." It was soft toss of a question to Warren, and her response was echoed by other Democrats. "Donald Trump just sits in the White House and gloats about what's going on, when you have so many people that are having trouble affording college and having trouble affording their premiums," said Minnesota Sen. Amy Klobuchar, a moderate who declined to swipe at Warren's ambitious plans. Former Rep. Beto O'Rourke of Texas slammed Trump's tax cut as part of "an economy that is rigged to corporations and to the very wealthiest." And Rep. Tim Ryan, who represents several declining industrial areas in Ohio, said, "This issue we're talking about has been going on for 40 years." Only former Rep. John Delaney of Maryland clearly disagreed and said many of Warren's promises were not realistic. ___ HOW FAR ON IMMIGRATION? No issue in the first Democratic debate showcased the contrast with Trump more than immigration. But the issue also exposed significant rifts among his challengers namely the two Texans on the stage. Castro took sharp aim at O'Rourke, who has campaigned heavily on border issues, for not proposing decriminalizing illegal migration in his immigration blueprint. Such a step would make a significant change to U.S. immigration law. "If you truly want to change the system, we have to change that section" of federal law, Castro said. O'Rourke said he wanted to keep the provision so authorities could pursue drug and human traffickers. But Castro cut him off, noting there are separate laws that could be used against those crimes, and the entire stage broke down into crosstalk and shouting. Several other contenders including Warren, New Jersey Sen. Cory Booker and Washington Gov. Jay Inslee have already signed on to Castro's approach. ___ APPEALS TO DIVERSE BASE The diversity of the modern Democratic Party was on display Wednesday night three women, one black man and a man of Mexican heritage vying for the presidential nomination. And the candidates made sure they were speaking to the party's base, which is becoming younger and less white. O'Rourke showed off his fluent Spanish in his opening statement. Booker countered with his Spanish during a discussion of immigration, and also noted that he's probably the only candidate who lives in a poor, predominantly minority community. (Booker lives in Newark.) Castro spoke in Spanish during his closing statement and talked about saying "adios" to Trump. New York Mayor Bill de Blasio noted he has an African American son as he urged the party to "stop acting like the party of elites." ___ A NEW DEMOCRATIC BOOGEYMAN? Perhaps the hardest question for Democrats to answer was how the candidates would deal with a Republican. Not Trump, but Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell. Republicans have a good chance of still controlling the Senate even if Democrats win the White House in 2020, and it's unlikely McConnell would allow any of the candidates' ambitious proposals on government-run health care or green energy to become law. Warren promised she had a plan to deal with McConnell, though it seemed to center on rallying public opinion against him. "We have to push from the outside and lead from the inside," she said. Booker proposed that the party's presidential nominee campaign in longshot states like South Carolina in hopes of snaring enough seats to take over the Senate. Inslee suggested eliminating the filibuster which the president cannot do and which would strengthen McConnell's hand if the GOP remained in the majority. Claim: Takeaways from the Democratic presidential debate.
Output: Democrats hoping that Wednesday night's first presidential debate of the 2020 campaign would be clarifying probably came away disappointed. There were no major stumbles but few standout moments as 10 candidates vied for the nation's attention.