Given a paragraph about movies and a set of conversational questions and answers about the paragraph, say whether the passage contains sufficient information to answer the follow-up question. Say Yes if it is answerable; otherwise, say No. The paragraph has the prefix 'CONTEXT:'. Each conversation question has a prefix 'Q:' followed by the answer prefix 'A:', and the follow-up question has a prefix 'FOLLOWUP_Q:'.
--------
Question: CONTEXT: David was of great historical interest to the future A.I.s, since he had actual memories of human beings, who are apparently long extinct by their time. Beyond that, he was actually built by humans, where they are undoubtedly built by other A.I.s. Studying him would help them understand their own past. They wanted to preserve him, and although they are not organic, seem to have a morality which prevents them from simply taking him apart or locking him in a cage. <sep> Q: Why was David's happiness so important to the Mecha descendants? A: he had actual memories of human beings, who are apparently long extinct by their time <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: What movie was this event in?

Answer: No

Question: CONTEXT: Nothing as such shown in MCU, but according to the Marvel storyline and stuff, Odin used to come to Earth very frequently due his addictions to alcohol and women. He used to brag and spill secrets when drunk, either to men at a bar or to women whilst bedding them, and the news kept on spreading and so on. I will add sources to my answer in an edit as soon as I find time for it. <sep> Q: How would anyone include Thor in the mythology and so Erik know about Thor? A: He used to brag and spill secrets when drunk Q: What did Odin explain that they rescued the earth in the first movie? A: Odin used to come to Earth very frequently due his addictions to alcohol and women Q: Oh, so it seems he had a real problem with alcohol? A: He used to brag and spill secrets when drunk, either to men at a bar or to women whilst bedding them Q: Wow, what sort of secrets would he reveal? A: Nothing as such shown in MCU <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: What is MCU?

Answer: No

Question: CONTEXT: Tom Dougherty: He was a douchebag and doesn't seems to have many friends in the department. Miss Kringle found the note about him leaving Gotham which Nygma forged. Gotham is a city where crime is at its peak, and a police officer running away like that doesn't seem surprising. Kristen Kringle: Nygma was trustworthy until then and was dating Kringle, so when he told Leslie Thompkins that Kringle had reconciled her relationship with Dougherty and left Gotham, she trusted him. People just trusted what Nygma told them, because they thought he was trustworthy. And we don't know about their families; they might have had no-one of their own, it's possible in a city where people die so frequently. Plus, they work in a police station which is always too busy to care about them. <sep> Q: Why doesn't anyone care about the whereabouts of Miss Kringle and Tom Dougherty? A: He was a douchebag and doesn't seems to have many friends in the department <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: In what respect was he a douchebag?

Answer:
No