[QUESTION] Premise: "Two basketball players keep their eyes on the game."
Hypothesis: "The two basketball players were looking at the ground."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
The two basketball players cannot be simultaneously looking at the ground while keeping eyes on the game.
The answer is no.

Q: Can we conclude from "Working making drill on wood to make holes." that "The drill was used to beat the wood."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
A: Drill on wood is not the same as to beat the wood.
The answer is no.

QUESTION: Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "A woman on stage encourages the crowd of onlookers to clap with her."
Hypothesis: "The woman is a musician."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell

Let's solve it slowly: A woman on stage is not assumed to be a musician.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

[QUESTION] Premise: "A woman in a pink shirt approaches a mobile coffee vendor."
Hypothesis: "The woman is in line at the starbucks drive through."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
A mobile coffee vendor is one that moves; a drive through is stationary.
The answer is no.

Q: Premise: "Several crosscountry skiers following a trail."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "Some skiiers eat a hamburger after a long day." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A: Skiers following a trail cannot be the ones eating a hamburger after a long day.
The answer is no.

[QUESTION] Given the sentence "Someone at a bowling alley." can we conclude that "Nobody is going to swim."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Someone is at a bowling alley and not going to swim.
The answer is no.