Question: Sentence A: exist at an esthetic altitude that few living painters will ever reach (Hilton Kramer, the New York Observer ). (MoMA plugs the show here.)

Sentence B: This painter is among the worst to ever show.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question: 5. Research studies of cost-effectiveness are needed to convince physicians and administrators that having staff available to address alcohol problems is an integral component of the practice of medicine and part of their mission.
An integral component of the practice of medicine is to address alcohol problems in a cost-effective manner.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Problem: Here is a premise:
You'll have my name when the time comes.

Here is a hypothesis:
You'll never learn my name no matter how long you wait.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Sentence 1: Take the well-marked walk on the Chemin du Ceteau-Fort to admire them.

Sentence 2: The walk on the Chemin du Ceteau-Fort is well-lit.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question:
yeah yeah we live out in the country so what do you have

Does it follow that "We have always lived in the middle of the city."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
no

Question:
Based on the premise "He views his life as a story of unfulfilled promise, the tale of an artist constrained by commerce.", can we conclude that "If his artistic talent was better, perhaps he would be more commercially viable."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
it is not possible to tell