In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence can be inferred from the statement. Incorrect choices change the meaning in important ways or have details that are not mentioned in the statement. Indicate your answer as 1,2, or 3 corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

Input: Consider Input: Statement: and i was oh i was ever so impressed with the campus in fact it was a two day trip and between appointments i got a chance to walk around and see it Choices: 1. I was there for two days and I was impressed by the campus. 2. There's a lot of cool architecture there. 3. I thought the campus was disappointing.

Output: 1

Input: Consider Input: Statement: When you hear that despite the fact that he has economists who know better, the Justice Department's Joel Klein apparently either believes or chooses to claim that this case is about path dependence, you start to wonder. Choices: 1. Joel Klein is lying about the case, and it's obvious why. 2. Joel Klein's claim that the case is about path dependence is fully backed up by his economists. 3. Joel Klein says that this case is about path dependence, even though the economists who work for him know that isn't true.

Output: 3

Input: Consider Input: Statement: and i've been up there a few times but didn't accomplish too much because i just run down too quick Choices: 1. I feel sick up there. 2. I didn't accomplish much because it get tired. 3. I am in very good condition health wise up there.
Output: 2