IN: Please plan to attend a lunch this coming Friday in 30C2 with Sara and I and possibly some of the newer credit people to go through basic ISDA, CSA and confirmation issues. We'll get started around Noon and probably go until 1:30. Carol

Generate a subject line.

OUT: Friday's Lunch
IN: This is an email
I'm working with Mike Corbally's office to get the missing information on Reporting Service, Reporting Agency and Datasource for the European based weather confirmations. As soon as I have that information available, I will plug it into the confirms and email the confirms to you. Mark Taylor said someone there in London Legal was working on a list of approved jurisdictions for derivatives. Is it ready yet? Can I get a copy of it? I need it to continue my work on the approved counterparty list. Thanks!

What is the subject?

OUT: Online Trading-Weather
QUESTION: Tim, I thought I would send you a copy of the East Mid-Market QBR to give you a view on what Presto/Baughman are doing. The West historically has been far better than the East in covering the market and generating mid market deals/services. I look forward to our discussion in Portland next week. I would like to get a perspective on organization, market approach, deal flow, resources, products and coverage for the Mid-Market group at that meeting. Regards
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: East Mid-Market _ QBR
Tim/Bob: Attached is the letter that we sent to Lynch explaining the info we thought ought to be made publicly available. We're discussing how we can ensure that the market has access to any and all information that FERC might use in its "investigation" so that independent analyses might be undertaken. Is there anything in addition to the information we included in the letter to Lynch (or that is already be publicly available) that FERC might use in its investigation and that we ought to target for public release? Thanks alot. Best,
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: CA ISO / CAL PX Information Related to 2000 Market Activity
Hi John, I took very poor notes from your phone call. Did you want to see a form of LOI? For what type of transaction? Thanks,
Answer: Your call
Q: Steven : I have finally had a chance to go over the outstanding credit issues with Rod Nelson, our credit person, and here are his responses: 1. We cannot agree to the additional language in the cross-default provision. We need a trigger that is not subject to interpretation and second-guessing and the language that you proposed does just that. 2. On credit event upon merger, we would prefer to define the standard for "materially weaker" as below investment grade. Is that a problem for you? 3. With respect to payment netting, we would prefer that netting apply to Transactions that are of the same product line (i.e. all commodity swaps). Is that a problem for you? We thought that your operational issue had to do more with netting across product lines. 4. In the Credit Support Annex, we would prefer that the number of days to resolve disputes over exposure and/or value be 2 business days instead of 1. I am in the process of reviewing the new drafts of ISDA and CSA Schedules and will get back to you shortly on remaining comments. Carol
Propose a subject line
A:
Credit Comments