Question:
Based on the premise "Now I'm sure it looks to you like a big metal spike because frankly, that is what it is.", can we conclude that "The metal spike was tiny."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
no

Question: Sentence A: These protections, enacted to encourage truth before trial, have the paradoxical effect , when publicized, of making Lewinsky appear crazy, mendacious, guilty, or some combination thereof.

Sentence B: Lewinski had something she was trying to hide.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question: Silence followed.
It was followed by silence.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Problem: Here is a premise:
He was up to his hands and knees, and almost managing a walking pace.

Here is a hypothesis:
He was moving almost as fast as someone walking would be.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Sentence 1: Family rooms have been introduced in many spots, making it easier for younger children to enjoy meals with their parents (and vice versa).

Sentence 2: Family rooms did not make any changes to family meals.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: no

Premise:
"Then we will be able to get at Kitchell, and the army will settle him for good and all!""
Hypothesis: We will never be able to get at Kitchell.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
no