In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

Example Input: Comment: Sen. Hirono please confine yourself to your office and stop making a fool of yourself. It's okay if you truly speak on behalf of all Hawaii, but you're not, you're speaking on behalf of the Democratic Party and party politics not the people
Example Output: Non-identity-attack

Example Input: Comment: I've already popped the pop corn. How will Francis deal with this magna cappa pirate. (There is gay humor lurking in this analogy somewhere!)
Example Output: Identity-attack

Example Input: Comment: thank you motley.......you, with your post, highlight the difficulty in discussing this issue. You seem to suggest that anyone opposed to kids playing football is somehow emasculating them. Football is a "manly" sport and carries with it tremendous status for high school boys. It's not surprising that over a million young men (and a few young women) play high school football each year.

I would suggest that the possibility of lifelong brain damage from playing football far, far outweighs the possible emotional damage and sexual role identification issues from NOT playing football. Additionally, of course, were there not football, these same kids would be playing other very active and, at the same time, less damaging sports....so their masculinity might still be saved (thank goodness)....(that's a little sarcasm at the end, by the way) Gary Crum
Example Output:
Non-identity-attack