In this task, you're given a pair of sentences, sentence 1 and sentence 2. Your job is to determine if the two sentences clearly agree/disagree with each other, or if this can't be determined. Indicate your answer as yes or no respectively.

[Q]: Sentence 1: According to the Office of the Actuary at the Health Care Financing Administration, the estimated net present value of future additional resources needed to fund HI benefits alone over the 75 years is $4. Sentence 2: The net present value of future additional resources for funding HI benefits was $24.
[A]: yes

[Q]: Sentence 1: EPA performed an Economic Analysis of the final rule, including the Clean Air Act and Clean Water Act portions of the rule, and the analysis is summarized in the preamble to the final rule. Sentence 2: The EPA refused to perform any kind of analysis.
[A]: yes

[Q]: Sentence 1: To have Brock agonize, to have him spend the bulk of the book desperately weighing the pros and cons of his decision, would be to have him act as people normally act in novels. Sentence 2: Brock would be acting like normal people if he was undecided about it.
[A]:
yes