[QUESTION] Can we conclude from "Two male basketball players are playing a competitive game while the referee is standing behind watching." that "A referee is watching two male basketball players play the game."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
Sentence one focuses on the actions of the basketball players playing the game while sentence two focuses on the referee who is watching the basketball players play the game.
The answer is yes.

Q: Given the sentence "A girl in a black coat and red hat riding a red sled down a snowy hill." is it true that "The girl is going very fast."?
A: Sledding down hill does not mean that the girl is going very fast.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

QUESTION: Given the sentence "A gathering of people outside of the space needle in seattle." is it true that "A group of people are walking on the bridge in san francisco."?

Let's solve it slowly: Walking in San Francisco wouldn't be possible if someone were in Seattle.
The answer is no.

[QUESTION] Premise: "Baby wears green frog big and makes grotesque face."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "The babe wore a brown bear." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
The baby cannot be wearing a frog and a bear at the same time.
The answer is no.

Q: Premise: "People walking along a concrete dock toward a large."
Hypothesis: "White ship."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
A: A ship with has just set sail with all passengers on board.
The answer is no.

[QUESTION] Given the sentence "A boxer in red with an intricate tattoo gives his opponent a right hook to the head." can we conclude that "A boxer with an intricate unicorn tattoo is punching his opponent."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Just because a boxer has a tattoo does not mean that it's of a unicorn.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.