IN: This is an email
Dave and Scott, I saw an article mentioning that EPA published a draft guidance (66 Fed. Reg. 52,403) clarifying the definition of "stationary source" to allow heat/power co-generation facilities to be treated as separate sources from the underlying host facility (e.g., a manufacturing plant) for NSR purposes. Although the focus of the draft guidance is on cogeneration facilities, I suppose that there might be some general language in there that could clarify the single-source analysis as it pertains to the ancillary equipment at our plants for which no separate BACT analysis was done. Are either of you familiar with the new draft guidance (or with anything else that we could use to bolster our position on this issue)? Many thanks, Ryan

What is the subject?

OUT: Pompano/Deerfield: threshhold requirements - single source

IN: This is an email
Jim, Per your and others' authority, on Friday, December 15, I sent to Sharron West, the lead adjuster for Underwriters on the above-referenced three insurance claims, a request for an extension of time by which the insureds could filed suit against Underwriters through and including March 15, 2002. I will give you a call on Wednesday, and if you have heard nothing by then from Underwriters, we can discuss a follow-up. I would greatly prefer to have some response before the intervention of the Christmas holidays. I will keep you advised. Britt

What is the subject?

OUT: In re Enron Petrochemicals Claim Against Underwriters/In re M/V PACIFIC VIRGO/In re M/V INDUSTRIAL BRIDGE

IN: This is an email
Gerald, The PSC held a pre-hearing conference today on the territorial dispute. It was uneventful. The Hilgert testimony was admitted as Exhibit 14 to WFEA's submission. WFEA sought a delay, Gulf opposed. No delay was granted. Bill

What is the subject?

OUT:
Today's Hearing