input question: Following the Pollard affair, rumors circulated that Israel had penetrated other agencies. If this premise is true, does that tell us:"There were rumors about Israel's involvement with other agencies."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: yes

Question:
Based on the premise "Names were still potent, resonance worked within its limits, and the general principles of similarity still applied; but those were not enough for them.", can we conclude that "There is power in names."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
yes

Question: Sentence A: Fenner, a wide grin splitting his beard, bellowed: "That shore was a race!

Sentence B: Fenner frowned and said, "That was a boring race.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question: George W. Bush takes both covers.
Bush takes no covers.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Problem: Here is a premise:
At the same time, the federal CIO faces additional challenges as a result of specific legislative responsibilities (e.g.

Here is a hypothesis:
the federal CIO faces additional challenges such as needing to keep track of external profits.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question:
The evidence that has accumulated over the years, mostly from Soviet archives, has overwhelmingly favored Chambers' version of the facts.

Does it follow that "The evidence has piled up that favors Chambers' versions of how the battle was won."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
it is not possible to tell