[QUESTION] Can we conclude from "The man has a goatee and wear black gloves while riding a bike." that "A man in gloves and goatee rides a bike."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
It has already been stated that the man with the goatee and gloves is riding a bike.
The answer is yes.

Q: Premise: "Three onlookers watch a jogger pass as one of them hands him a drink."
Hypothesis: "Three onlookers watch a fast jogger pass."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A: A jogger does not have to be going fast in order for onlookers watch.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

QUESTION: Premise: "Construction workers at a construction site."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "Construction workers are at a lake." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Let's solve it slowly: The workers cannot be at a lake and construction site simultaneously.
The answer is no.

[QUESTION] Given the sentence "A beautiful horse is running in a fenced in area." can we conclude that "Wild animals are hunting."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A horse is one animal and differs from wild animals ( more than one). Running is not hunting. The horse is a vegetarian animal and does not hunt.
The answer is no.

Q: Premise: "A man in a leather jacket sings into two microphones."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A man sings into two microphones at a county fair." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A: Not all men singing into microphones are at a county fair.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

[QUESTION] Can we conclude from "A boy is pulling a wild face whilst waving cooking implements in his hands." that "A boy plays at being a tv chef."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
A boy waving cooking implements does not imply plays at being a TV chef.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.