Question: Sentence A: It is increasingly clear that the continued decline in the staff levels of the Congress will also necessitate that GAO retain sufficient resources to ensure effective partnering with the Congress as well as an institutional memory about government programs and operations.

Sentence B: A 20% cut in the staff levels of Congress will leave the GAO completely at a standstill.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question: Built by the Dominicans, it was the doges' funeral church with some 25 buried here, many in masterpieces of monumental tombs.
Dominicans built the funeral church of the doges.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Problem: Here is a premise:
i don't know um i think it covers a portion because like i said my sister lives over there and they they just they just never have to worry about it i think it might not cover full dental but it does cover some and again it covers you know

Here is a hypothesis:
I'm not sure if it covers full dental work, but I believe it covers some.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Sentence 1: i don't think so yeah i don't think so

Sentence 2: Yes, definitely.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: no

Question:
Such remarks, in any case, are part of Walcott's own emerging self-definition as a writer.

Does it follow that "Such remarks are a part of Walcott's emerging self-definition as a writer. "?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
yes

Question:
Based on the premise "On February 10, 1994, EPA held a public hearing so interested parties could present their views on the proposed rule.", can we conclude that "Most parties did not say anything at the EPA's public hearing/"? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
it is not possible to tell