Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.

Example Input: AP reported they have contacted all of the Democratic Superdelegates last week and all but 45 will vote for Clinton.
"She has 520 currently right now. Almost 70% of her current Super delegate count came before the Primary even began. She has gained 161 super delegates since voting began.
Bernie has 39. He has gained 31."
I was very concerned with the report Bernie supporters are harrassing these delegates. They aren't changing and Sander's campaign guy Jeff Weaver just said--"none contacted will vote differently."
Example Output: No

Example Input: The only safeguard "regular" citizens have against the powerful is a more powerful governance. It is incredible that "conservatives" cannot seem to understand it. We are in a very strange and unique (among all other people upon this earth) position wherein close-to-a-majority of regular working-class Americans have so become worshipful of the rich and powerful that they somehow have become accustomed to identify with their "oppressors" goals.
If denying people health care, good schools, and safe neighborhoods isn't oppression, what the heck is?
Example Output: Yes

Example Input: I'm not sure it's appropriate to have a picture of someone smoking before a run to support cancer.
Example Output:
No