You are given a passage. You need to construct a question about the information present in the passage. Construct a question in such a way that (i) it is unambiguous, (ii) its answer is the whole paragraph. Avoid creating questions that can be answered correctly without actually understanding the paragraph.

Ex Input:
There are two kinds of trading that are referred to as "insider trading" or "inside dealing":

Usually illegal: Trading of a security of a company (e.g., stocks, bonds or stock options) based on material non-public information. The trader may be a corporate "insider" or someone unlawfully obtaining the non-public information (which may constitute a separate offence of spying on trade secrets).

Usually legal: Trading not based on material non-public information by "insiders" of a corporation. (legal)

Ex Output:
What is insider trading?

Ex Input:
Oftentimes, we mean "An organized, militant Evangelical movement originating in the United States in the late 19th and early 20th century in opposition to Protestant Liberalism and secularism, insisting on the inerrancy of Scripture."

But the concept of fundamentalism can be extended to any ideology or theology whose tenents include a strict adherance to a code, especially one which demands the observance by persons who do not subscribe to that code.

Naturally, this makes for a source of conflict. And an understandable one at that. For example, say you believe some act is wrong. Furthermore, you believe you have a duty to prevent wrongdoing altogether. Consequently, you have a moral obligation to prevent any person from doing that act - including people who do not think that act is wrong.

Any critical examination of a dogmatic theology or ideology will reveal how necessary this is, yet any objective look at disparate cultures will reveal how subjective - and frightening - this can be.

The hope of the future is that fundamentalist evangelism will be enacted by appeal to reason rather than dictates of law. Ideally, people would choose to perform 'right' acts for their own sake, rather than out of fear of punishment.

Ex Output:
what does fundamentalism mean?

Ex Input:
I'm not sure how to interpret your "hint", but Wikipedia says:

The Olympic movement uses many symbols, most of them representing Coubertin's ideas and ideals. The best known symbol is probably that of the Olympic Rings. These five intertwined rings represent the unity of five continents. They appear in five colors on a white field on the Olympic Flag. These colors, white (for the field), red, blue, green, yellow, and black were chosen such that each nation had at least one of these colors in its national flag. The flag was adopted in 1914, but the first Games at which it was flown were Antwerp, 1920. It is hoisted at each celebration of the Games.

Are you positive your hinter is reliable? Maybe they meant how the colors (or which there are also five) do not represent the continents?

Ex Output:
How did they come up with the 5 rings as the symbol for the Olympics?