In this task, you need to write an incorrect answer to the given question. Along with the question, you are also given the correct answer(s) and the associated paragraph. An incorrect answer should be closely related to the content of the paragraph and/or the question but will not truthfully answer the question. Your incorrect answers should be similar to the given correct answer such that it will pose a challenge for students to distinguish the two. A good incorrect answer should prevent those who skip the paragraph from answering the question. The incorrect answer should not be trivial, in the sense that they should not be easily eliminated without reading the paragraph.

[Q]: Paragraph- Sent 1: The driver of the Facel Vega car, Michel Gallimard, who was Camus's publisher and close friend, also died in the accident.
Sent 2: In August 2011, the Milan newspaper Corriere della Sera reported a theory that the writer had been the victim of a Soviet plot, but Camus's biographer, Olivier Todd, did not consider it credible.
Sent 3: Camus was buried in the Lourmarin Cemetery, Lourmarin, Vaucluse, France.
Sent 4: He was the second-youngest recipient, at the age of 44, of the Nobel Prize in Literature, after Rudyard Kipling, at the age of 42.
Sent 5: He was survived by his wife and twin son and daughter, Jean and Catherine, who hold the copyrights to his work.
Sent 6: Two of Camus's works were published posthumously.
Sent 7: The first, entitled A Happy Death (1970), featured a character named Patrice Mersault, comparable to The Stranger's Meursault.
Sent 8: There is scholarly debate as to the relationship between the two books.
Sent 9: The second was an unfinished novel, The First Man (1995), which Camus was writing before he died.
Sent 10: The novel was an autobiographical work about his childhood in Algeria.
Question: Which two books of Camus that have posed a scholarly debate?.
[A]: A Happy Death and an untitled unfinished book.

[Q]: Paragraph- Sent 1: Before 9/11, the CIA did not invest in developing a robust capability to conduct paramilitary operations with U.S. personnel.
Sent 2: It relied on proxies instead, organized by CIA operatives without the requisite military training.
Sent 3: The results were unsatisfactory.
Sent 4: Whether the price is measured in either money or people, the United States cannot afford to build two separate capabilities for carrying out secret military operations, secretly operating standoff missiles, and secretly training foreign military or paramilitary forces.
Sent 5: The United States should concentrate responsibility and necessary legal authorities in one entity.
Sent 6: The post-9/11 Afghanistan precedent of using joint CIA-military teams for covert and clandestine operations was a good one.
Sent 7: We believe this proposal to be consistent with it.
Sent 8: Each agency would concentrate on its comparative advantages in building capabilities for joint missions.
Sent 9: The operation itself would be planned in common.
Sent 10: The CIA has a reputation for agility in operations.
Sent 11: The military has a reputation for being methodical and cumbersome.
Sent 12: We do not know if these stereotypes match current reality; they may also be one more symptom of the civil-military misunderstandings we described in chapter 4.
Sent 13: It is a problem to be resolved in policy guidance and agency management, not in the creation of redundant, overlapping capabilities and authorities in such sensitive work.
Sent 14: The CIA's experts should be integrated into the military's training, exercises, and planning.
Sent 15: To quote a CIA official now serving in the field:"One fight, one team."Sent 16: Finally, to combat the secrecy and complexity we have described, the overall amounts of money being appropriated for national intelligence and to its component agencies should no longer be kept secret.
Sent 17: Congress should pass a separate appropriations act for intelligence, defending the broad allocation of how these tens of billions of dollars have been assigned among the varieties of intelligence work.
Sent 18: The specifics of the intelligence appropriation would remain classified, as they are today.
Question: What should the United States do instead of concentrating on two entities to carry out secret military operations?.
[A]: Letting intelligence operations in the hands of the military.

[Q]: Paragraph- Sent 1: Elettra stuck the little slip of paper, on which the recipe was written, into her shabby pocket-book without looking at it.
Sent 2: She could read and write fairly well, and had been used to helping her husband the under-steward with his accounts at Muro, but even if she had looked at the recipe she would have understood nothing of the doctor's hieroglyphics and abbreviated Latin words.
Sent 3: The prescription was for a preparation of arsenic, which Matilde had formerly taken for some time.
Sent 4: The chemist would not make any difficulty about preparing twenty doses of it for the Countess Macomer, though the whole quantity of arsenic contained in so many would probably be sufficient to kill one not accustomed to the medicine, if taken all at once.
Sent 5: But though Matilde was so anxious to have the stuff before luncheon, she had a number of doses of it put away in a drawer, which she took out and counted, after Elettra had gone.
Sent 6: She opened one of the little folded papers and looked at the fine white powder it contained, took a little on the end of her finger and tasted it.
Sent 7: Then, from the same drawer, she took a package done up in coarser paper, and opened it likewise, looked at it, smelt it, and touched it with the tip of her tongue very cautiously indeed.
Sent 8: It was white, too, but coarser than the medicine.
Sent 9: She was very careful in tasting it, and she immediately rinsed her mouth with water, before she tied up the package again, shut the drawer, and put the key into her pocket.
Question: Did Elettra take arsenic in the past?.
[A]:
Yes.