In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.

Comment: Totally agree - everytime I see a comment like this it just pushes me to the Liberals

EVerytime I think I'm losing faith with them, I see the vitril and dumbness of CPC commentators and I'm reminded why I support Mr. Trudeau

Ironic that the very attacks intended to bring Trudeau down actually help him. Only by attacking policies does the opposition have a chance. The "just not ready" didn't work in 2015 and certainly won't work in 2019.
Disagree

Comment: Khadr did not kill your father and as far as I know, your father's human rights were not abused by the Canadian federal government. I therefore fail to see the relevance of your comment.
Disagree

Comment: Which "victims" is Munoz referring to? The victims in both of these rape cases are CHILDREN. Munoz never in either of her letters once mentioned the children who were raped by their parents and foster parent. Adding insult to injury, Munoz is only backing away because she's getting the message that law abiding Alaskans with morals are going to take her legislative seat away from her; as it should be. Too little too late, Munoz. How dare you back peddle for the wrong reason. Alaskans should continue pressuring Munoz to resign from the Legislature. Anything short of that is unacceptable.
Agree