Q: - G Attached is a contract from Colorado Springs Utilities for your review. I've made a couple of changes already that you will see red-lined. Let me know what you think. Thanks,
Propose a subject line
A: CSU contract for your review
IN: Bruce, Enron North America Corp. selected 4 candidates for interview for summer clerkship positions from the resumes you forward. Two were made offers with both accepting the offers. The two clerks we have working this summer are: Alisha Mahabir - South Texas College of Law Nabil Nachawati - University of Houston Law Center Nabil will be working the 1st half of the summer and Alisha will be working the 2nd half of the summer. Thanks for all your help with this process. If you need any further information, please do not hesitate to call me at (713) 853-3512. Gerald Nemec

Generate a subject line.

OUT: HBA Summer Clerkship Program
IN: This is an email
Rhett: Does this work for you? This is language from Deutsche Bank in lieu of the= ir=20 proposed modifications to the defined term "Indemnifiable Tax" which you=20 looked at a few weeks ago. Carol

What is the subject?

OUT: Indemnifiable Tax language
QUESTION: Ken, Per my voicemail, we are having an all employee meeting on next Monday at the Hyatt Regency. The purpose of this meeting is to pull everyone together for an update on EGM and a brief presentation from all the business units within EGM. This includes about 1 hour of business and then drinks and food - we expect about 500 people. We have made a lot of progress on changing the nature and profitability of these businesses and we want to make sure everyone sees just how far we have come in a few months. I believe they will be motivated to see the growth and profitability. We had a record Q1 with $100 million of gross margin. That was 50% of what they made in all of 2000. Combined with the fact that in December of 2000 alone we made $87 million in gross margin, I believe it will have a big impact. If you could attend the meeting even for a few minutes it would go a long way in helping us drive our other point which is that the EGM businesses are now core to Enron and has the attention of both you and Jeff. Thanks for considering this and let me know if you need any other information or assistance. Mike
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: EGM - all company meeting
As you might recall, York filed two summonses against Enron and Eric Holzer in two separate lawsuits' connected with the parties' dealings in the paper market. The two summonses (as allowed by Pennsylvania law) lacked any information about York's claims against Enron or Mr. Holzer. The Enron defendants removed their suits to federal court. Dechert is the Enron defendants' outside counsel. We have finally received York's complaint detailing its claims against Enron and Mr. Holzer. In a nutshell, York claims that Enron hired Holzer away from York in an effort to steal York's customer base and then, contrary to the parties' agreement and custom in the industry, proceeded to steal customers from York. Specifically, York claims that the only reason it let Holzer out of his non-compete agreement with York is because both Holzer and Enron promised: that they would honor the allegedly established practice in the paper industry preventing competitors from usurping each other's client relationships by selling paper directly to each other's clients, and that York would get new business from Enron. It is York's position that Holzer took confidential and proprietary information from York when he left that company, gave this information to Enron and that Enron and Holzer used this information to wrongfully steal York's customers. York has alleged causes of action against Enron and Holzer for: 1. Theft of trade secrets, 2. Breach of contract (several counts), 3. Tortuous interference with contractual relations, 4. Tortuous interference with prospective contractual relations, 5. Fraudulent inducement, 6. Unfair competition, and 7. Civil conspiracy. My initial impression is that York should be more worried about having agreements with its competitors preventing business solicitation then Enron should be worried about a predatory pricing claim; however, I don't know enough about the facts to have a firm view of the case. We are in the process of getting more information about these claims and I'll update you again after we have talked to our folks about this. In the meantime, please call with any questions or comments.
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: York Paper Litigation
Hey, great talking to you. I appreciate your willingness to talk to David about the DOE situation. He's a great guy and one of the best substantive lawyers I've met. Short bio--U. of Missouri undergrad, Northwestern law
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer:
David Hill