Problem: Here is a premise:
But by now the statistics have been gone over by professionals, who have come up with different results.

Here is a hypothesis:
The reason the professionals have different results is because the research was conducted at different times.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Sentence 1: toward the strategic goals defined in plans?

Sentence 2: Does this relate to the identified long-term mission as set forth in the plans?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: yes

Question:
Earlier he had favored comprehensive schools.

Does it follow that "He had preferred comprehensive schools before."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
yes

Q: If All very well, but this is very dull for ME! , can we say that "This is especially interesting for me."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A: no

Premise:
"Of course an actor " " But Poirot cut me short ruthlessly. "
Hypothesis: Poirot left me alone and I was thankful.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

no

Sentence 1: so when the PC came on the market and then it being first one on the market earlier than the Amiga was but when it came market people just naturally assumed that well if IBM makes it should be the computer of my choice and they intend to look around very much so as a result Macintoshes and uh Amigas didn't get a fair break

Sentence 2: The IBM PC, the first personal computer on the market, stole the spotlight from its later competitors.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer:
yes