Premise: "Nobody pointed out that at Chappaquiddick, unlike Dallas and Los Angeles, the person most responsible for the tragedy was a Kennedy, whereas the victim was not--and that Ted Kennedy's invocation of the family curse was a clever way of papering over these differences." If this premise is true, what does that tell us about whether it entails the hypothesis "The victim was not a Kennedy but the perpetrator was a Kennedy."?
it is not possible to tell