We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty) into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.
--------
Question: Sent1: By killing a person who murdered someone, you are just doing the same thing you are punishing him/her for.
Sent2: You are probably going to murder somebody; hopefully it will b in a place with the death penalty and then you will get what you deserve.

Answer: Not similar

Question: Sent1: I mean the death penalty is giving them a passage out of trouble, they wouldn't have to deal with the effects they had on the world.
Sent2: Like I said I would just want them to actually have to deal with the consequences and not get an easy out, which is what executing them does.

Answer: Similar

Question: Sent1: If we don't stop the death penalty before we try to fix it, the imperfect system will continue to convict innocent people while we determine what is best for it.
Sent2: By the same token, if we keep administering the death penalty while the system is broken, we will have a much greater risk of putting someone innocent to death.

Answer:
Similar