Premise:
"One was huge, dressed in black plate armor, a high neck guard, black cloak, and a leather three-corner hat."
Hypothesis: One of the which was very large, perhaps strong, covered in armor up to his neck, coated with a cloak covering their identity... a hat on their head.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

yes

input question: EPA performed an Economic Analysis of the final rule, including the Clean Air Act and Clean Water Act portions of the rule, and the analysis is summarized in the preamble to the final rule. If this premise is true, does that tell us:"The EPA concluded that the Clean Air Act was a waste of money."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: it is not possible to tell

Question:
Based on the premise "They were all children back then.", can we conclude that "They were all related."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
it is not possible to tell

Question: Sentence A: oh yeah is there anybody who doesn't

Sentence B: Everybody does.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question: The Commission subsequently modified its proposal regarding resale in a Second Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (Interconnection and Resale Obligations Pertaining to Commercial Mobile Radio Services, CC Docket
After this the Commission made changes to its proposal.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Problem: Here is a premise:
Roxanne's ex-husband

Here is a hypothesis:
Roxanne's former spouse.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer:
yes