IN: This is an email
Mary & Teresa: Here's the latest draft awaiting comment from George Gilbert, Tim Proffitt, Tanya and Chris Sherman. Let me know if you have any comments. Thanks.

What is the subject?

OUT: KCS - VC0917 & VC09

IN: This is an email
Richard Sanders and I talked with Elizabeth (an attorney with AEP). She was not sure that their was a question that needed to be answered. Richard opined that the question may have related to the effect on HPL if it lost the Taub lawsuit. This suit relates to an alleged violation of the surface rights agreement (Collateral Agreement) which was entered into with certain surface owners after the Unit Agreement was signed. Richard explained that if HPL lost the suit, it would lose its rights to maintain a pipeline and well facilities on the property subject to the lawsuit. In that event HPL would have to either locate its pipeline around the property or use its condemnation rights to acquire an easement across the property. Because the Collateral Agreement relates to surface rights, losing those rights would not affect HPL's rights under the Unit Agreement and thus the Taubs would not have the right to drill a well to produce the gas that HPL has in storage.

What is the subject?

OUT: Taub lawsuit Project Triple Lux

IN: This is an email
EFFECTIVE 12/1/01 - RB Robertson & Sons is canceling his contract with Enron for approx 1,000/day metered production. Reason: With fixed prices in the $3.50-$3.70 range, Roc and his investors want to lock -in for a period greater than one year. He will sign a contract with Dominion Field Services.

What is the subject?

OUT:
RB Robertson & Sons