In this task, you're given a paragraph and title from the research paper. Your task is to classify whether the given title is suitable or not for the research paper based on the given paragraph. Return "True" if title is proper according to paragraph else "False".

Input: Consider Input: Paragraph: Proteinchip profiling is a powerful and innovative proteomic technology for the discovery of biomarkers and the development of diagnostic/prognostic assays. On the basis of surface-enhanced laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (SELDI-TOF MS), Ciphergen's proteinchip system offers a single, unified, and high throughput platform for a multitude of proteomic research applications. Proteins are the major functional components of the cell. The study of proteomics helps to better understand the mechanism of a disease. Remarkable findings in disease biomarkers have shed light on the early diagnosis, monitoring, and prognosis of various diseases, especially for cancer. In this paper, the development and technology of SELDI-TOF MS are introduced. The research progress and encouraging research results in malignancies, infectious diseases, neurological diseases, and diabetes mellitus using SELDI-TOF MS are reviewed. This paper concludes by evaluating the pros and cons, and the future perspectives are also expounded.
Title: Research Progress in SELDI-TOF MS and Its Clinical Applications

Output: True

Input: Consider Input: Paragraph: Background: Porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDV) is emerging as a pathogenic coronavirus that causes a huge economic burden to the swine industry. Interaction of the viral spike (S) surface glycoprotein with the host cell receptor is recognized as the first step of infection and is the main determinant of virus tropism. The mechanisms by which neutralizing antibodies inhibit PEDV have not been defined. Isolating PEDV neutralizing antibodies are crucial to identifying the receptor-binding domains of the viral spike and elucidating the mechanism of protection against PEDV infection. Methods: B cell hybridoma technique was used to generate hybridoma cells that secrete specific antibodies. E.coli prokaryotic expression system and Bac-to-Bac expression system were used to identify the target protein of each monoclonal antibody. qPCR was performed to analyze PEDV binding to Vero E6 cells with neutralizing antibody. Results: We identified 10 monoclonal antibodies using hybridoma technology. Remarkably, 4 mAbs (designed 2G8, 2B11, 3D9, 1E3) neutralized virus infection potently, of which 2B11 and 1E3 targeted the conformational epitope of the PEDV S protein. qPCR results showed that both 2B11 and 2G8 blocked virus entry into Vero cells. Conclusion: The data suggested that PEDV neutralizing antibody inhibited virus infection by binding to infectious virions, which could work as a tool to find the receptor-binding domains.
Title: Neutralizing antibodies against porcine epidemic diarrhea virus block virus attachment and internalization

Output: False

Input: Consider Input: Paragraph: Context: Over the past decade, a number of high-impact natural hazard events, together with the increased recognition of pandemic risks, have intensified interest in health systems' ability to prepare for, and cope with, "surges" (sudden large-scale escalations) in treatment needs. In this article, we identify key concepts and components associated with this emerging research theme. We consider the requirements for a standardized conceptual framework for future research capable of informing policy to reduce the morbidity and mortality impacts of such incidents. Here our objective is to appraise the consistency and utility of existing conceptualizations of health systems' surge capacity and their components, with a view to standardizing concepts and measurements to enable future research to generate a cumulative knowledge base for policy and practice. A systematic review of the literature on concepts of health systems' surge capacity, with a narrative summary of key concepts relevant to public health. The academic literature on surge capacity demonstrates considerable variation in its conceptualization, terms, definitions, and applications. This, together with an absence of detailed and comparable data, has hampered efforts to develop standardized conceptual models, measurements, and metrics. Some degree of consensus is evident for the components of surge capacity, but more work is needed to integrate them. The overwhelming concentration in the United States complicates the generalizability of existing approaches and findings. The concept of surge capacity is a useful addition to the study of health systems' disaster and/or pandemic planning, mitigation, and response,
Title: Health Systems' "Surge Capacity": State of the Art and Priorities for Future Research
Output: True