Sentence 1: an abortion case

Sentence 2: the case was about abortion rights after 20 weeks.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question:
Conclusions should be clearly stated, not implied.

Does it follow that "It's preferable to beat around the bush regarding your conclusions."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
no

Q: If yeah nice talking to you too bye, can we say that "Hello, would you like to talk?"?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A: no

Premise:
"Other, more challenging choices, for which you should enlist the help of a guide, take you up to Mount Perdah (1,576 m/5,169 ft), Mount Jasar (1,696 m/5,562 ft), and Mount Beremban (1,841 m/6,040 ft)."
Hypothesis: More challenging choices require a guide.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

yes

input question: Did I mention that Applied has a very high staff turnover? That's because the best and the brightest work best under pressure. If this premise is true, does that tell us:"Applied has a very low staff turnover."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: no

Q: If you know the simple things like that and, can we say that "You know good simple recipes."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A:
it is not possible to tell