People can be on bleachers and be watching something other than a game.. So what could be the question?
Question followed by answer: Premise: "People are sitting in bleachers watching some activity below them."
Hypothesis: "The people are at a game."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
it is not possible to tell
It can't show that there are no paved roads if it only show the inside of a classroom.
The question and answer are below.
Premise: "A group of young children in a village with no paved roads."
Hypothesis: "The kids are sitting in a classroom in the village."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
no
Regardless of what the room is full of the men are standing in a room.
The question and answer are below.
Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "Two men are standing in a room full of unmade beds."
Hypothesis: "Two men are standing in a room."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
yes
Most times you would not be joyously in the public fountain if you have no shirt on.. So what could be the question?
Question followed by answer: Given the sentence "A smiling girl with no shirt on and braids in her hair plays in the water of a public fountain." is it true that "A smiling girl joyously with no shirt on."?
it is not possible to tell
Sentence one gives a description of the scoop while sentence two could be any scoop.
The question and answer are below.
Given the sentence "A shirtless man is scooping away sand with a pink scoop while a little girl watches." is it true that "There is a scoop being used."?
no
A dog running through the forest does not imply that it is chasing a rabbit.
The question and answer are below.
Given the sentence "A shaggy dog runs down a dirt trail in a lush forest." is it true that "A dog is chasing a rabbit through the woods."?
it is not possible to tell