instruction:
Categorize the comment on the basis of severe toxicity. If the comment is severely toxic output Yes, otherwise output No.
question:
That's a common misconception about tenured faculty. It depends on the department, college or university. Some tenured faculty are expected to publish a lot, whereas others are not expected to publish at all. I know of full professors who haven't published in a decade but have earned "honors" and "awards" and pay increases not contingent on publishing. Some are rewarded for other activities, or simply by the reputation they earned many years ago. Sometimes, like in any organization, there is favoritism, nepotism, etc.

The status of tenure is also changing with this new generation of faculty, as universities and colleges no longer have (and most can't financially sustain) as many tenured faculty as they once did. This coincides with the fact that the structure of higher education is also changing as online education is becoming more prominent and campus-based higher education is less necessary for delivering quality research and instruction to a wide audience anywhere.
answer:
No

question:
BJ, it's funny but you and I never say that the Koch Bros. don't understand their own interests. It's always the less empowered groups that are lectured re: their own interests. You can dance around your problem- that the majority of Portlanders reject New Urbanist policies- but it still exists.

The majority of Portlanders like SFH, hence Novick's abysmal approval ratings.

I know that you are not anti-democratic, so the lack of democratic support for increased density must bother you. Fact is, New Urbansim is co-opted by those who stand to make money off greenwashing & real estate. It can and will be rejected at the polls.
answer:
No

question:
Way to go Monegan! It's Alaska's apology for the insult "someone" unjustly fired at you.
answer:
No