Robert Ricks is a Lead Forecaster with the National Weather Service in New Orleans. He is interested in coming in to interview for the position. He indicated that next Tuesday or Wednesday would be the best dates for him. He is working midnight to 8am for the remainder of this week. He can be reached on his cell phone at any time...985-373-0608 or at home...985-875-0015. His work number is 985-649-0429. He will be sending me a resume in the next few days. On other candidates: Bill Read (MIC- NWS Houston) is considering whether to interview or not. I will remain in contact with him. Mark Walquist (Forecaster - Wilkens Weather) has declined to interview due to job security issues. John Lewis (Lead Forecaster - NWS Little Rock) has declined to interview due to "happy where I am and no money can change my mind." I am trying to get an update on the status of Steve Lyons, other Weather Channel employees, and Matt Rogers.
Answer: Weather position
Some questions about the 1st. Per the proxy, we should be injecting 26,219 dt/day into storage. You are showing 36,304 dt/day on the FOM sheet. AND I see a citygate load of 29,461 dt/day. This morning Tim Ray sold Dick 23,060 dt/day at the pool. Is this to reduce the citygate load or is this additional New Power supply?
Answer: Sep 1st. TCO
Lee, You should be receiving a package shortly containing the following: 1. Changed pages for CA Energy Development I and CA Energy Development II facility agreements. These are the same pages that were faxed to you and Kent a few days ago. I also included a couple of original pages (73, 74, I think) which were missing from one of the originals. This need to be initialled and executed. 2. Acknowledgement letters for each of CAED I and CAED II which need your Here's the form: 3. Assignment and assumption agreement to move the equipment from TurboPark to the CAED I. There will be one for CAED II as well. This document is being reviewed by the bank, so I'm not convinced it is in final form. You will note that there is an acknowledgement section for GE. I cut and pasted from the consent to assignment from the TurboPark documents, but shortened the whole thing considerably. Here's that document: 4. Signature pages (signed by Enron) from the ESA deal, both the facility agreement and the override letter. Obviously, we need your signature. I will forward the final CA facility agreements to you once again, along with the blacklines against what you initialled. Thanks,
Answer: CA Energy Development documents
Shari: I am negotiating an ISDA with Dresdner Bank and I have the following questions concerning their mark-up of the FX/Currency Option language: 1. In the EMU Protocol language they want to add a reference to Section 6. I'm not sure why but wanted your thoughts on this. Are there any circumstances under which we do not adopt the Protocol provisions? 2. They want to define the FX Definitions as the 1998 FX and Currency Option Definitions as amended and supplemented by the 1998 ISDA Euro Definitions. Is this okay? What is the effect of this? Should we change our form to do this? With respect generally to the FX and Currency Option Definitions, as a general rule are they always incorporated by reference into the terms of any FX and Currency Option transaction even if it is electronically confirmed? They wanted to add language to that section of our form specifically stating this. Thanks in advance for your help. Carol
Answer:
FX/Currency Option Questions