Context:
I'm really strongly committed to clean water and clean air, and cleaning up the new kinds of challenges like global warming. He is right that I'm not in favor of energy taxes. I am in favor of tax cuts to encourage and give incentives for the quicker development of these new kinds of technologies.
Hypothesis: Companies don't need incentives to help develop new technology. OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No
No
Input: OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No

They are both already in application internationally; both are advantageous to passengers, shippers and carriers; they allow greater uniformity of the rules governing international air transportation; they will both contribute to lessening the risk of litigation within the aeronautical industry.

Sentence: The rules governing international air transportation are very strict.

Output: It's impossible to say
Problem:
Read the following paragraph and determine if the hypothesis is true:

Maybe we should ask. So if you're asking me if I feel it's enough or if it's -- I'm not sure what it is you're asking me about that. I feel, actually, that there are topics that probably could be explored in more detail, but I understand that there are limitations within any textbook that you have to hit on core concepts. I believe that core concepts are covered, but I think that, in my opinion, what I've looked at, it's historical context.

OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No
Hypothesis: historical context has been reviewed by michael
****
Answer:
It's impossible to say
[Q]: Well, the line comes from deciding what the First Amendment interest is, and if this Court heed the First Amendment interest off of this difference between selecting who gets the benefit of 20 years of extension and just simply legislating in a general way prospectively, then this Court could hold, with respect to the prospective, that it's not even necessary to raise the intermediate scrutiny in that context, but again, for Ashwander reasons we don't think that this Court should address the prospective aspect of the CTEA even under the First Amendment. The court in question was concerned with deciding if the Third Amendment applied to the CTEA. OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No
[A]: It's impossible to say
Problem: I asked .<br>'' But Miriam only gave another queer smile and made no answer at all .<br>Whatever her beliefs or theories were , she would never discuss them .<br>'' She had a habit of dropping into abstracted reveries at any time or place .<br>No matter where she was , this , whatever it was , would come over her .<br>She would sit there , perhaps in the centre of a gay crowd , and gaze right out into space , not hearing or seeing a single thing that went on around her .<br>'' I remember one day in particular ; we were sewing in my room .

Based on the paragraph above can we conclude that "When I asked, Miriam would not reply."? OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No

A: Yes
Context:
How to create a strong email marketing campaign<br>Determine the purpose of your email marketing campaign. Common reasons for undertaking such a project include introducing a new product or service, offering discounts to boost sales or to move excess products, or further constructing your brand and getting your name out to more and more potential buyers. Put together a mailing list of possible customers.
Hypothesis: Introducing a new product is not a reason for an email marketing campaign. OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No
No