This is the content of an email: The only problem I can see with this is that paragraph 4 could be construed to encourage NMNG to request amendment not only to increase the MAXDTQ but also to decrease it (if the MAXDTQ has been increased by a previous amendment). I worry that this might mislead NMNG that the parties can decrease the MAXDTQ by agreement rather than NMNG using capacity release procedures. However, the paragraph does not obligate TW to do anything & doesn't give NMNG any rights, since any change in the MAXDTQ must be by mutual agreement (and it's subject to available capacity). Since it does not seem to give either party anything they do not already get under the tariff, I think I would recommend we omit it. However, NMNG might insist on this or similar language to reflect the "deal" --- or at least the conversations of

Subject: Transwestern Contract Approval Request

This is the content of an email: WChiume@nyiso.com writes to the NYISO_TECH_EXCHANGE Discussion List: THE ECONOMIC OUTLOOK MEETING Presentation by Economy.com The NYISO Analysis & Planning Department is pleased to announce the next Economic Outlook Meeting scheduled for October 18, 2001. The meeting will be at the NYISO facilities: 290 Washington Avenue Extension Albany, NY 12203 There will be lunch at NOON. The meeting starts at 12.45 PM. Dr. Celia Chen and Dr. Steve Cochran from Economy.com will present the outlook for New York, Northeast and U.S. economies. The meeting is open to any market participant interested in attending. I encourage market participants to attend this meeting particularly given the current 'uncertainty' on where the economy is heading. The presentations will cover a broad range of issues, including: ? will the interest rate cuts help? ? was the tax cut sufficient, or 'timely?' ? how are the New York metro economies doing? ? the impact of the stock market on New York, and ? what are the implications of the global economic slowdown to the U.S. economy? The last meeting in March was vibrant and insightful. I anticipate the same for the next one, so mark your calendars. Also, send me any questions that you would like to see addressed by Economy.com. Preferably by September 28. Please call me or send email to confirm your attendance. Regards,

Subject: FALL ECONOMIC OUTLOOK MEETING

This is the content of an email: Leslie: Can you attend this meeting for me? I will be in London. Patti: Can you get time and location for Leslie and let them know that she will be there instead of me? Thanks.

Subject: Agenda for SAP Optimization Meeting -- Wednesday, Jan. 17

This is the content of an email: Following last week's meeting, here is my recommendation on how to proceed with SCE. 1. Form Enron Negotiation Team My recommendation is to use the same team we used with PG&E + Jeff Dasovich. My understanding was that Lisa M. was the lead negotiator - I would not change this. Jeff should only be there to make introductions. 2. Meet & Confer (10/29) Sue Mara and Jeff Dasovich will listen and report back to everyone on what happens. 3. Reformed Stipulation I would propose that we take a wait and see approach to this document. Based on Dasovich's idea to get together with SCE on Thursday, maybe let this ride. 4. Meeting My understanding is that (Jeff D. please correct) SCE can meet with us this Thursday. Can everyone make it that needs to be there? Probably meet in California. We should put the laundry list on the table. Please let me know what else we need to discuss or if anyone disagrees. Thanks,
Subject: Proposed SCE Negotiation Strategy