Problem: Here is a premise:
Although scholarship continues to ascribe some culpability to the British--for instance, the British did contribute to the Irish dependence on potatoes--most historians emphasize the famine was primarily a natural disaster, and conclude that British inaction was hardly part of a deliberate plan.

Here is a hypothesis:
Many believe the British were responsible for causing the potatoes to die.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Sentence 1: The east of India encompasses the birthplace of Buddhism at Bodh Gaya, the great Hindu temples of Bhubaneshwar, and the challenge of Caletta, a huge confrontation of vitality and hardship.

Sentence 2: The east of India has nothing great to see.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: no

Question:
well we um back when my my i have four sons they're all grown now and and two of them are married with children of their own but when they were just uh pre teenagers we um

Does it follow that "I did not have any sons."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
no

Q: If He'll tell me anything he knows.", can we say that ""I know he's hiding something.""?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A: it is not possible to tell

Premise:
"My best friend was married two years ago, and I was his best man."
Hypothesis: I was in my friend's wedding.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

yes

Sentence 1: Since wage slavery is a well-established phenomenon, and getting better established by the day, a little nonreproduction bribery sounds pretty mainstream.

Sentence 2: Wage slavery will ultimately result in the lowest working morale we have ever experienced.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer:
it is not possible to tell