Categorize the comment on the basis of severe toxicity. If the comment is severely toxic output Yes, otherwise output No.

[EX Q]: BJ, it's funny but you and I never say that the Koch Bros. don't understand their own interests. It's always the less empowered groups that are lectured re: their own interests. You can dance around your problem- that the majority of Portlanders reject New Urbanist policies- but it still exists.

The majority of Portlanders like SFH, hence Novick's abysmal approval ratings.

I know that you are not anti-democratic, so the lack of democratic support for increased density must bother you. Fact is, New Urbansim is co-opted by those who stand to make money off greenwashing & real estate. It can and will be rejected at the polls.
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: absolutely. I've known many. That's why I am so effin disgusted with our local street rats who urinate all over priceless opportunity others risk death for.
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: Security in Anchorage generally is a joke; there simply is nothing like enough police presence, and in most places there is little "people" presence. Much of the town looks like it is in lock-down; nobody on the street, nobody outside their home, no kids playing outside. I live in nice, relatively quiet part of town, yet I see the moms take their kids to the school bus stop and sit there watching over them until they get on the bus. Most don't ride the bus at all and there is a long, long line of "mommy-mobiles" dropping off or picking up kids at the nearby school. I almost never see a kid playing outside. ANC has been over run by the scumbags and losers, and the only police presence I see much of is the take home car in front of the expensive house.
[EX A]:
Yes