Here is an email: This seemed so appropriate with all that's going on...may God lift you in your time of need....Amen!! Today's Power Verse: John 14:1 NIV Do not let your hearts be troubled. Trust in God; trust also in me. God Bless, Julissa
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: Today's Power Verse...
Q: Already in TW's Tariff 1. Dollar valuing. Need to terminate volumetric OBA's where possible to minimize TW's financial exposure. Proposed in TW's 637 Filing - Keep 1. Mandatory cash-out each month (after netting and option to trade). 2. Definition of 6 indices (vs. 3 in current tariff). 3. Parties may mutually agree to cash out PNR. Could probably do today without this language. 4. Clarification that PNR may be used by Operators. 5. May use PNR for "auto-balancing". Proposed in TW's 637 Filing - Could "Trade" 1. Daily balancing. Including daily tolerance, daily auto-transfer to PNR & daily pricing. 2. Smaller tolerance range. Proposed change from +/- 10% to +/- 5%.
Propose a subject line
A: Notes from 637 Imbal Mtg 9/18/01
IN: I received a call from the consultant who performed the archeology survey at stations 1 and 2. Based upon the plot plan provided by construction, the archeology discovery at station 1 does not occur within the area of proposed impact, even though part of the discovery is within the facility fence. The report recommendation to the SHPO by the archeologist will be that during construction activities in this area, an archeologist be onsite to monitor and ensure that the site is not impacted. They will also recommend that we fence the discovery area within our facility to ensure that future pipeline activities will not disrupt the site. I have asked that two reports be prepared for each site. One report for each station covering the construction areas and the other reports to include the entire 40 acres at each compressor station. All four reports will be submitted to Bret Fritch in Omaha on Monday, the 26th of March.

Generate a subject line.

OUT: Station 1 Archeology Discovery
IN: This is an email
Marlo, The name and number of the person to contact regarding the billing discrepancy for July 2001 is Mary Reid @ 213-244-3898. Gasselect clearly shows only one trade for 43,559 mmbtu's from account 2527 to Z99. Mat

What is the subject?

OUT: Socal discrepancy
QUESTION: I was forwarded a copy of Fernley's announcement regarding your new role fo= r=20 Global Products Trading Support. Your discussions in Houston last week mus= t=20 have swayed you to accept the challenges that are there. Congratulations o= n=20 your new role. As you step into your new position, please let me know how = I=20 can best support you in my role over Global Risk Management Operations. I = am=20 forwarding a copy of the announcement regarding my expanded role that was= =20 sent out in January. Assuming that you were not paying particular attentio= n=20 to trading operations issues at that point in time, this may be one of thos= e=20 e:mail messages that you skipped. I thought that it might be helpful for y= ou=20 to understand the focus that I will have in working with trading operations= =20 groups around the globe. I certainly will look forward to working with you= ,=20 Tim and Kevin. =20 I understand that Kevin will move into a role that is focused full-time on= =20 systems implementation. Who will assume the day-to-day lead responsibility= =20 for Global Products trading operations in Houston and how will that=20 individual report in to you? =20 I will be in the London office during the week of March 20. I will leave= =20 Houston on Sunday evening, so that I should be in the office by noon on=20 Monday. I plan to be there through Thursday evening. Let me know if you= =20 will be in town that week, so that we can schedule some time together. =20
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: Congratulations on New Role
IN: Chuck - As we discusssed, attached is a marked version of the Participation Agreement which I have marked with some comments. Though I understand that we have existing agreements with ICE that were pretty much unchanged I was not involved in the original discussions relating to these agreements. I also understand the message you left relating to the reluctance of ICE to modify the agreement. I only ask that you review the attached and let me know your thoughts. Thanks for the cooperation and time. Mark

Generate a subject line.

OUT:
Participation Agreement w/ENA Upstream