You will be given a definition of a task first, then some input of the task.
Read the given text and if it has abusive content then indicate via "yes". Otherwise indicate via"no".
We consider the content to be abusive if it contains any of the following instances: (1) Identity Directed Abuse (e.g., Content which contains a negative statement made against an identity. An identity is a social category that relates to a fundamental aspect of individuals community, socio-demographics, position or self-representation) (2) Affiliation Directed Abuse (e.g., Content which express negativity against an affiliation. We define affiliation as a (more or less) voluntary association with a collective. Affiliations include but are not limited to: memberships (e.g. Trade unions), party memberships (e.g. Republicans), political affiliations (e.g. Right-wing people) and occupations (e.g. Doctors).) (3) Person Directed Abuse (e.g., Content which directs negativity against an identifiable person, who is either part of the conversation thread or is named. Person-directed abuse includes serious character based attacks, such as accusing the person of lying, as well as aggression, insults and menacing language.) and (4) Counter Speech (e.g., Content which challenges, condemns or calls out the abusive language of others.). Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

Slight closeted elitist, he says. He is pretty much an open elitist of the highest order. The guy is so convinced that he is correct about politics that he barely talks to his father because of it: >My dad, too. He's very smart in so many ways, but he's always had his blind spots, and lacked the self-awareness to know his own shortcomings. That was *before* he got hooked on Fox News. Over the past ten years, I've witnessed a gradual decline in his ability to think critically. It's really sad, mostly because I've lost much of my desire to talk to him, even about non-political topics, because it often seeps in. > >I moved out of the U.S. in '18, not specifically because of Trump, but Trump*ism* has certainly made me unmotivated to return any time soon. I'm working on acquiring dual citizenship -- again, not because of Trump *per se* -- but because I'm not comfortable being tied to a country that was stupid enough to elect such an imbecile and patently obvious fraudster as president. The possibility of America sliding into a dystopian nightmare is no longer the realm of sci-fi. > >I occasionally talk to my dad, and it's okay in small doses, but this whole thing has really hastened his irrelevance as he ages (he's in his late 70s). I have zero bitterness or resentment toward him, but I don't know if I'll see him again before he dies, and I don't feel conflicted or emotional about that fact, which is itself, ironically, sad. [Link] His entire post history in general is disturbing. The guy is fifty and decided about a year ago to take a multi-year vacation with his wife and 8 year old kid. Whenever he discusses home schooling he pretends that his child is a genius that already knows college level psychology and philosophy. He also proudly proclaims how the children of other people, like his nephews and nieces, are destined to be factory workers while his kid is destined to own the factory because of the great education he gives her. His entire post history is /r/iamverysmart material and a significant portion of it is him trying to convince himself that he isn't a selfish asshole for pulling his young child out of school away from her friends so that he can travel the world with his wife.
Output:
no