We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control) into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Input: Consider Input: Sent1: The only way the person would get the gun back is if the person was found not guilty.
Sent2: But that does not change the fact that the law has made the individual into a prohibited person, so that her gun possession is, in itself, a federal felony.

Output: Not similar

Input: Consider Input: Sent1: People that read the 2nd amend as a militia thing also must think dangerous criminals will obey gun control laws.
Sent2: This is just as unrealistic a view that saying gun laws will prevent all crime- of course some criminals will not obey the law- that is what makes them criminals!

Output: Not similar

Input: Consider Input: Sent1: You're saying that an unarmed man can't have intent to cause violence since he's unarmed?
Sent2: He says that you can't judge the intent of others to make a life or death decision, but if you see somebody stabbing another person, then it's likely not a Sunday greeting that means nothing.
Output: Not similar