Q: If He was--and, weirdly enough, still is--writing principally as a Nixon apologist aiming to trivialize Watergate itself., can we say that "He apologizes for Nixon."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A: yes

Premise:
"Many people do not have the option of going to France outside the main holiday periods ' Easter, July, and August."
Hypothesis: Outside of the main holiday periods of Easter, July and August, many people don't have the option of seeing France.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

yes

input question: you know once they they have been arrested and if they know beyond a shadow of a doubt these people are guilty that's it we don't take care of them we don't support them If this premise is true, does that tell us:"If someone's found guilty, we shouldn't have to support them."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: yes

Question:
Based on the premise "In other words, it amounts to a bribe.", can we conclude that "Basically what it is is corruption."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
it is not possible to tell

Question: Sentence A: i think if if he was uh healthy San Francisco would have stomped those guys it wouldn't have been much of a contest

Sentence B: San Francisco lost all their games because of his poor health.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question: Sentence A: It is a city to which people migrate from all over Spain in search of new opportunities; a place where few people can claim any deep roots.

Sentence B: The city brings great advantages to those who migrate from other provinces.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer:
it is not possible to tell