input question: Lake's The Senate's demands for his FBI files, new questions about the CIA's role in the foreign-money scandal, and further unpleasant hearings on top of the pounding he's already taken. If this premise is true, does that tell us:"Lake's The Senate demands for his FBI files, new questions regarding the role of the CIA in the foreign-money scandal, and other unpleasant hearings on top of what he has already gone through. "?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: yes

Question:
Based on the premise "Bork was staring at him in hilarious incredulousness that broke into roars of laughter.", can we conclude that "Bork stared at him in mute horror and didn't make a sound."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
no

Question: Sentence A: St. Catherine's has long been a very wealthy and influential monastery, founding schools in Greece and around the Orthodox world.

Sentence B: St. Catherine's is the richest monastery in the world.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question: The corrupting thing about compulsory voluntarism is that it preys on the high-minded to the benefit of the unscrupulous.
Compulsory voluntarism preys on the high-minded.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Problem: Here is a premise:
oh yeah i've read that one too

Here is a hypothesis:
It was a good read.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question:
Lacking the solidarity to unite and too weak to resist by themselves, Italian kingdoms and duchies were reduced to convenient pawns in Europe's 18th-century dynastic power plays.

Does it follow that "The Italians were unable to unite."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
yes