Question:
Based on the premise "Some of the shops still exist, and the sumptuously decorated Grand Vefour restaurant looks just the way it did 200 years ago.", can we conclude that "The shops managed to survive 200 years due to the excellent food quality and prices."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
it is not possible to tell

Question: Sentence A: What that lender has done is in effect to give you a put option on whatever you buy with that trillion dollars.

Sentence B: The lender rejected the loan.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question: For instance, in a hot-selling series of novels co-authored by the well-known preacher Tim LaHaye, he's Romanian.
Tim Lahaye has never written anything.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Problem: Here is a premise:
You can attack the privatization argument on two main fronts.

Here is a hypothesis:
You can't argue about it, the privatization is the only way.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Sentence 1: Back in Durbar Square, pigeons swirl constantly around one of Kathmandu's most colorful shrines, the Kala (Black) Bhairav.

Sentence 2: Feeding the pigeons is a popular past time around Kathmandu, and they are considered sacred.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Premise:
"Pursuing sharp reductions in CO2 from the electricity generating sector alone would cause a dramatic shift from coal to natural gas and thus would run the risk of endangering national energy security, substantially increasing energy prices and harming consumers."
Hypothesis: The use of generating electricity from coal to natural gas would not impact national energy security.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
no