What is the subject line for this email?

Mark, I can use your advise on a few new projects that I am working on. 1. The weather desk is trying to roll out a HDD Swap for Calgary by Monday= . Most of the anticipated buyers of the product will be Canadian counterpa= rties ECC has masters with. The desk originally thought that we need to cr= eate a GTC for Enron Canada using the ENA weather GTC. Because if the time= issues involved in creating a new GTC (fixing all the things that are wron= g with the ENA form) I looked for a new way to deal with this issue. I thi= nk I found it in section 3(d) of the ETA which provides that the Enron coun= terparty to a particular transaction will be the Enron Entity they have a m= aster with that covers that type of transaction. I believe this provision = was a stroke of genius designed for just this type of scenario. I can prep= are the long description to specify the Enron entity as "the applicable Enr= on entity" and if there is a master then the Enron Entity is the one with t= he master pursuant to Section 3(d) of the ETA and if there is no master the= ETA says the GTC applies and the GTC specifies that ENA is the counterpart= y. Do you think this works? 2. I was contacted by someone at McKinsey & Company yesterday who is worki= ng with the weather desk to develop a Bermuda Transformer Commercial Struct= ure to partner up with the Insurance market to provide some capital to our = weather trading desk. I have been told that conceptually it will be a Jedi= type arrangement. I have been asked to help them think through the issues= and coordinate with the other attorneys who work on these types of issues.= I do not want to get too deep into the structuring of this investment veh= icle myself without the appropriate legal group involved. Would this be so= mething Jordan Mintz's group would handle or would this be something that L= ance Schuler's group would develop? I thought I might want to talk to Juli= a Murrey (or Cristina Mordant or Carol St. Clair) to see what issues croppe= d up in the development of Jedi I and Jedi II (or maybe I should just talk = to whatever lawyer is currently handling these structures). What are your = thoughts on how to move forward? 3. The other rush deal is a financing deal out of Jordan's group. The dea= l I helped look at that was a physical forward using ISDA type language is = now a financial deal (a series of Total Return Swaps) that needs to close n= ext Friday. I will go to a meeting in the morning to try and get more info= rmation on the structure. Angela Davis who has worked on the Total Return = swap deals has offered to help me pilot this through. Sara thought I shoul= d check with you to make sure you don't have a problem with me taking on on= e of these deals. I am going to try and make sure they have Danny Sullivan= from A&K working on the deal since he is the most knowledgeable lawyer on = this type of structure. =20 I hope all goes well with your return flight plans. Brent
New Project Direction