Question:
Based on the premise "It was crude, but it might serve to represent the orrery.", can we conclude that "It is not too crude to represent the orrery."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
it is not possible to tell

Question: Sentence A: Involving employees in developing and implementing these goals and measures can help direct a diverse array of actions to improve performance and achieve results.

Sentence B: Employees participate in goal creation for a bonus.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question: Because, until recently with online trading, the whole industry I work in was predicated on the ignorance of the client.
A correlation has been found between smarter clients and the decline of my industry, but online trading is reversing that.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Problem: Here is a premise:
A moment.

Here is a hypothesis:
A single moment passed

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Sentence 1: yeah well we're not going to have much to fight over because i do too uh being an engineer most General Motors have pretty much and i'm not too sure about the rest of the cars i'm sure all the Japanese cars

Sentence 2: I'm pretty sure all the Japanese cars have that feature.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Premise:
"Basically I just shoot them in the right direction, said Gene Windham, a Vacaville attorney specializing in probate and tax law who helped out earlier this week. "
Hypothesis: Tax law is complicated.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
it is not possible to tell