In this task, you are given text for US Congressional and California state bills, your task is to generate a summary for this bill.
One example is below.
Q: SECTION 1. LIABILITY OF BUSINESS ENTITIES PROVIDING USE OF FACILITIES
TO NONPROFIT ORGANIZATIONS.

(a) Definitions.--In this section:
(1) Business entity.--The term ''business entity'' means a
firm, corporation, association, partnership, consortium, joint
venture, or other form of enterprise.
(2) Facility.--The term ''facility'' means any real
property, including any building, improvement, or appurtenance.
(3) Gross negligence.--The term ''gross negligence'' means
voluntary and conscious conduct by a person with knowledge (at
the time of the conduct) that the conduct is likely to be
harmful to the health or well-being of another person.
(4) Intentional misconduct.--The term ''intentional
misconduct'' means conduct by a person with knowledge (at the
time of the conduct) that the conduct is harmful to the health
or well-being of another person.
(5) Nonprofit organization.--The term ''nonprofit
organization'' means--
(A) any organization described in section 501(c)(3)
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and exempt from
tax under section 501(a) of such Code; or
(B) any not-for-profit organization organized and
conducted for public benefit and operated primarily for
charitable, civic, educational, religious, welfare, or
health purposes.
(6) State.--The term ''State'' means each of the several
States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto
Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, the Northern
Mariana Islands, any other territory or possession of the
United States, or any political subdivision of any such State,
territory, or possession.
(b) Limitation on Liability.--
(1) In general.--Subject to subsection (c), a business
entity shall not be subject to civil liability relating to any
injury or death occurring at a facility of the business entity
in connection with a use of such facility by a nonprofit
organization if--
(A) the use occurs outside of the scope of business
of the business entity;
(B) such injury or death occurs during a period
that such facility is used by the nonprofit
organization; and
(C) the business entity authorized the use of such
facility by the nonprofit organization.
(2) Application.--This subsection shall apply--
(A) with respect to civil liability under Federal
and State law; and
(B) regardless of whether a nonprofit organization
pays for the use of a facility.
(c) Exception for Liability.--Subsection (b) shall not apply to an
injury or death that results from an act or omission of a business
entity that constitutes gross negligence or intentional misconduct,
including any misconduct that--
(1) constitutes a crime of violence (as that term is
defined in section 16 of title 18, United States Code) or act
of international terrorism (as that term is defined in section
2331 of title 18) for which the defendant has been convicted in
any court;
(2) constitutes a hate crime (as that term is used in the
Hate Crime Statistics Act (28 U.S.C. 534 note));
(3) involves a sexual offense, as defined by applicable
State law, for which the defendant has been convicted in any
court; or
(4) involves misconduct for which the defendant has been
found to have violated a Federal or State civil rights law.
(d) Superseding Provision.--
(1) In general.--Subject to paragraph (2) and subsection
(e), this Act preempts the laws of any State to the extent that
such laws are inconsistent with this Act, except that this Act
shall not preempt any State law that provides additional
protection from liability for a business entity for an injury
or death with respect to which conditions under subparagraphs
(A) through (C) of subsection (b)(1) apply.
(2) Limitation.--Nothing in this Act shall be construed to
supersede any Federal or State health or safety law.
(e) Election of State Regarding Nonapplicability.--This Act shall
not apply to any civil action in a State court against a business
entity in which all parties are citizens of the State if such State
enacts a statute--
(1) citing the authority of this subsection;
(2) declaring the election of such State that this Act
shall not apply to such civil action in the State; and
(3) containing no other provision.
A: Shields a business entity from civil liability relating to any injury or death occurring at a facility of that entity in connection with a use of such facility by a nonprofit organization if: (1) the use occurs outside the scope of business of the business entity; (2) such injury or death occurs during a period that such facility is used by such organization; and (3) the business entity authorized the use of such facility by the organization.
Makes this Act inapplicable to an injury or death that results from an act or omission of a business entity that constitutes gross negligence or intentional misconduct, including misconduct that: (1) constitutes a hate crime or a crime of violence or act of international terrorism for which the defendant has been convicted in any court; or (2) involves a sexual offense for which the defendant has been convicted in any court or misconduct for which the defendant has been found to have violated a Federal or State civil rights law.
Preempts State laws to the extent that such laws are inconsistent with this Act, except State law that provides additional protection from liability. Specifies that this Act shall not be construed to supersede any Federal or State health or safety law.
Makes this Act inapplicable to any civil action in a State court against a business entity in which all parties are citizens of the State if such State, citing this Act's authority and containing no other provision, enacts a statute declaring the State's election that this Act shall not apply to such action in the State.
Rationale: This Bill focuses on shielding business entities from civil liability relating to an injury or death depending on the conditions of injury, hence the generated summary is correct.
Q: SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ''Sage-Grouse Accountability and
Private Conservation Act of 2014''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

Congress finds that--
(1) pursuant to the court-approved work schedule described
in the Joint Motion for Approval of Settlement Agreement and
Order of Dismissal of Guardians Claims entitled ''In Re
Endangered Species Act Section 4 Deadline Litigation'' (D.D.C.
2011), not later than September 30, 2015, the Secretary is
scheduled to issue a decision on whether to proceed with
listing the greater sage-grouse as a threatened or endangered
species under the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C.
1531 et seq.);
(2) the Federal Government, through programs of the
Department of the Interior and the Department of Agriculture,
has invested substantial funds on greater and Gunnison sage-
grouse conservation efforts to avoid the greater and Gunnison
sage-grouse being listed as threatened or endangered species
under the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531 et
seq.);
(3) State wildlife management agencies have prepared, and
as of the date of enactment of this Act are in the process of
implementing, greater and Gunnison sage-grouse conservation
plans to complement the conservation efforts of the Federal
Government;
(4) private investment in conservation efforts,
independently and in conjunction with Federal cost-share
conservation easement programs, has been significant;
(5) through a combination of Federal, State, and private
efforts, significant conservation progress is being made, and
further progress will be made following full implementation of
State management plans and new Federal conservation programs;
and
(6) farmers, ranchers, developers, and small businesses
need certainty, and further clarity on the likelihood of a
listing decision will provide that certainty.

SEC. 3. DEFINITION OF SECRETARY.

In this Act, the term ''Secretary'' means the Secretary of the
Interior.

SEC. 4. GREATER SAGE-GROUSE REPORTING REQUIREMENT.

(a) In General.--Not later than December 15, 2014, the Secretary
shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report on the
status of greater sage-grouse conservation efforts.
(b) Contents.--In the report required under subsection (a), the
Secretary shall include--
(1) a description of public and private programs and
expenditures, including State and Federal Government agencies,
relating to greater sage-grouse conservation;
(2) a description of State management plans, including
plans that have been announced but not yet implemented;
(3) a description of Bureau of Land Management plans, or
plans by any other land management agencies, relating to
greater sage-grouse conservation;
(4) in accordance with subsection (c), a description of the
metrics that, at the discretion of the Secretary, will be used
to make a determination of whether the greater sage-grouse
should be listed as threatened or endangered under the
Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.);
(5) any outcome under the programs, expenditures, or plans
referred to in paragraphs (1) through (3) that can be measured
by the metrics described in subsection (c); and
(6) any recommendations to Congress for legislative actions
that could provide certainty to farmers, ranchers, developers,
and small businesses and could assist in the conservation of
the greater sage-grouse.
(c) Reported Metrics.--The metrics referred to in subsection (b)(4)
may include--
(1) the quantity of acres enrolled in sagebrush and habitat
protection in conservation programs established under title XII
of the Food Security Act of 1985 (16 U.S.C. 3801 et seq.) or
other conservation programs of the Department of Agriculture,
including conservation easements, land purchases or swaps,
vegetation management or habitat enhancement programs, and
fuels management programs;
(2) data on nonfire related habitat restoration efforts,
including native, nonnative, and mixed seeding efforts;
(3) data on mine reclamation and subsequent restoration
efforts intended to restore greater sage-grouse habitat;
(4) data on conifer removal;
(5) data on presuppression fire efforts, including--
(A) the number of acres associated with fuels
management programs; and
(B) the number of miles associated with fire
breaks;
(6) data on habitat restoration, including postfire
restoration efforts involving native, nonnative, and mixed
seeding;
(7) data on structure removal, power line burial, power
line retrofitting or modification, fence modification, fence
marking, and fence removal;
(8) for livestock and rangeland management, data on
allotment closure and road closure;
(9) for travel management, data on road and trail closure
and trail rerouting;
(10) data on greater sage-grouse translocation efforts,
including the number of greater sage-grouse translocated, the
age of each translocated greater sage-grouse, and the sex of
each translocated greater sage-grouse; and
(11) any other data or metric the Secretary may examine in
making the decision on whether to list the greater sage-grouse
as a threatened or endangered species under the Endangered
Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).

SEC. 5. AGRICULTURAL LAND EASEMENTS.

(a) In General.--Section 1265B(b)(2)(C)(i) of the Food Security Act
of 1985 (16 U.S.C. 3865b(b)(2)(C)(i)) is amended--
(1) by striking ''Grasslands'' and inserting ''In
general''; and
(2) by inserting ''and land with greater or Gunnison sage-
grouse habitat of special environmental significance'' after
''significance''.
(b) Considerations.--Section 1265B(b)(3)(B) of the Food Security
Act of 1985 (16 U.S.C. 3865b(b)(3)(B)) is amended--
(1) in clause (i), by striking ''and'' after the semicolon
at the end;
(2) in clause (ii), by striking the period at the end and
inserting ''; and''; and
(3) by adding at the end the following:
''(iii) maximizing the protection of
greater or Gunnison sage-grouse habitat.''.
A:
Sage-Grouse Accountability and Private Conservation Act of 2014 - Directs the Department of the Interior to report on the status of the greater sage-grouse conservation efforts by December 15, 2014. Requires the report to include a description of: (1) public (federal and state) and private programs and expenditures, (2) existing state management plans as well as plans that have been announced but not yet implemented, and (3) plans by land management agencies. Authorizes the Department of Agriculture (USDA) to provide funding under its agricultural land easements program for a conservation easement in an amount that is up to 75% of the value of land with greater or Gunnison sage-grouse habitat of special environmental significance. Adds maximizing the protection of that habitat as a consideration when ranking applications to the program.