IN: With respect to the attached list, a few things: 1. With respect to Dynegy Power Marketing, my records reflect that they are approved for all products (including financial & power). Can you let me know if your approvals reflect otherwise? 2. With respect to Nicor Gas Company and Northern Illinois Gas Company: Northern Illinois Gas Company should be restyled to be "Northern Illinois Gas Company d/b/a Nicor Gas Company". We have just received the executed ISDA Master with this entity and that is how the counterparty directed us to set the master up. Nicor Gas Company appears to be their physical gas trading arm, so that entity name should be left alone. I haven't forgotten the 8/11/00 list, I am waiting to hear back from Australia about a question.

Generate a subject line.

OUT: Counterparty Approval List for 8/14/00
IN: This is an email
Edmund Cooper just called and wanted to know what form changes we have made as a result of the new CFTC Rules. I told him we just met on that yesterday, and as soon as we revised the form, we would send it to London. Also, if there will be any changes in our advice to the traders resulting from this, please let him and he will disseminate the information to London Legal.

What is the subject?

OUT: CFTC Form Changes
QUESTION: Enron Kids No donation is too small! Please contact Stephanie Truss, 5-3861, or Martha Keesler, 5-2423, to make a cash donation. The deadline for making your cash donation is Thursday, December 6, 2001. EWS Legal Gordon Elementary School Adoption
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: Adopt a Kid - Reminder
Center for the Advancement of Energy Markets Wow! What a year 2001 has been for the supporters of energy competition. For every good bit of news (Pat Wood, one of our heroes at CAEM, being selected to head the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, and the continuing progress that the Canadians - yes, the Canadians - have made towards energy competition), we have had to bear one disaster and misstep after another throughout the year. Let's see, in December 2000, who could have predicted.. 1. The tragic events of September 11th. 2. The California implosion. 3. Pennsylvania marketer retrenchment. 4. Price volatility and high prices (but it could have been worse if Mother Nature did not help out). 5. Bush Energy Plan ignores meaningful restructuring. 6. Enron collapse. 7. FERC Blinks on Super RTO. 8. Texas missteps in pilots for opening the market. 9. No leadership emerged to meet the crisis in restructuring. 2001 was one heck of a year - but thankfully, probably the nadir of the movement towards energy competition in North America. As CAEM looks into our crystal ball (natural gas fired, of course) for the coming year, we see a better year. Below are some of the predictions and responses from the CAEM staff about what we expect to occur. The responses below are primarily concerned with electricity, but to a lesser extent, may be applied to natural gas as well. As always, do not bet the house on what we have to say. We are just a little think tank, kind of like the little engine that could. And we can. And we do. Happy New Year! The CAEM Staff P.S. If you would like to add a prediction or two, please send an e-mail with your name and contact information to Hope Duncan at hduncan@caem.org We will post them to our web site - www.caem.org Please identify which question below is being addressed by your prediction.
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: CAEM Predictions 2002
Ruth, Attached is my list of questions. Some might be repetitive, but just wanted to cover all my points. If I think of any others, I will let you know. Maria PS..File is located under our transportation folder
Answer: questions for legal
Q: Nabil, Can you please provide the dates that you are planning on working for the 1st half of the summer. I called your residence earlier today, but your machine did not pick up. It is probably easier to communicate via email since we both keep missing each other. Thanks.
Propose a subject line
A:
Starting Date