Question: Sentence A: The latter turned to Tommy.

Sentence B: He had come to trust Tommy for advice.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question: But the advice of CIOs of leading organizations should remain relevant regardless of the specifics of the situation.
The advice of the CIOs is relevant because they have achieved such success.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Problem: Here is a premise:
The assessment concluded that the best solutions to address risks to environmentally stressed resources are conservation measures applied in concerted, concentrated efforts in priority areas, with smaller scale efforts going to sectors outside priority areas.

Here is a hypothesis:
The assessment states that the pest solution is to look at the environment.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Sentence 1: Jon holstered the pistol, the barrel still smoking, on his left hip.

Sentence 2: Jon put the gun on his hip holster.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: yes

Question:
He spent most of the time in a delirium; sometimes he was dead, and there was an ultimate coldness like the universe long after the entropy death.

Does it follow that "He was mostly in delirium for a lot of his time."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
yes

Question:
Based on the premise "Th' soldiers they ain't no trouble.", can we conclude that "The soldiers aren't any trouble."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
yes