Question:
Based on the premise "What did you see? asked Adrin.", can we conclude that "What did you eat? asked Adrin."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
no

Question: Sentence A: The Unjust Clinton's moral theory, point by point, as expressed in his testimony.

Sentence B: The Just Clinton's moral theory was left out of the testimony for reasons unknown.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question: Reach Stephanie Hoops at stephanie.hoops@tuscaloosanews.com or 722-0204.
Stephanie Hoops is best reached by fax.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Problem: Here is a premise:
There could be no other answer to the immense bulk planned for this structure.

Here is a hypothesis:
The were many viable answers to the size of this structure.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Sentence 1: (It seems the operation can't be shut down.)

Sentence 2: The operation can't be shut down without damaging the machines.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Premise:
"The combined effect of the program and R&D expenditures, together with other policies described in the CEF report (including a $50 carbon charge applied in the CEF Advanced Scenario), drove a steady reduction in the need for energy compared to the CEF reference case."
Hypothesis: The CEF reference case underestimated energy needs by a large amount.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
no