Definition: In this task, you will be shown a prompt from a judicial decision and multiple holding statements derived from citations following text in a legal decision. Holdings represent the governing legal rule when the law is applied to a particular set of facts. There are five answer choices for each citing text. The correct answer is the holding statement that corresponds to the citing text. You should write an incorrect option. Even though there exist multiple wrong answers, we only need a single wrong answer. There is a <HOLDING> token in the position of the citing text prompt where the holding statement was extracted.
Input: repeat felony offenders, which reads: "A person who has been twice convicted of a felony under the laws of this state, any other state, or the United States prior to the conviction on which his or her application is based shall not be eligible for probation." Cf. Chism v. People, 80 P.3d 293 (Colo.2003). 4 . Both the majority and dissenting opinions in Sigala agreed that payment of workers' compensation benefits that had been suspended would resume once the suspension was lifted-the analogous question in this case. 184 P.3d at 46; id. at 47 (Eid, J., dissenting). The disagreement between the majority and dissenting opinions centered on an issue not presented in this case-that is, whether benefits accrued during a period of suspension to be payable once the suspension lifted. Id. at 46 (<HOLDING>); id. at 47 (Eid, J., dissenting) (finding no
Holding statements: (A) holding that the right of action accrued upon failure to perform contract (B) holding that the payments accrued (C) holding that cause of action for malpractice had accrued before underlying actions dismissal (D) holding that the cause of action accrued on the date of sale (E) holding that a plaintiffs 1983 claim accrued on the date of the alleged illegal search and seizure
Output:
holding that the right of action accrued upon failure to perform contract