Instructions: Generate an explanation for the given claim using the provided supporting material from the paragraph. Please consider the following points while generating an output. 1) The claim will always have supporting proof in the paragraph, and the paragraph will have a clear point of view supporting the claim. 2) There can be instances where direct correlation to the claim is not available. Make use of the sentences in the paragraph to provide a corresponding output supporting the claim. 3) The explanation should be at least one and at most twelve sentences long.
Input: Paragraph: Johnson & Johnson removed formaldehyde-releasing ingredients from its baby products back in 2014. Susan Nettesheim, the vice president of product stewardship and toxicology at Johnson & Johnson, wrote in a 2012 blog post that the companywould reformulate its baby products due to consumer concerns over ingredients: Over the past few years, some interest groups have raised questions about theingredients in personal care products used widely around the world, and they'veput particular focus on our baby products. At first we were disappointed, becausewe know that all our products are safe by scientific standards and meet orexceed government regulations. Over time, though, we've come to realize thatsometimes safety alone isn't enough. There's a vigorous public discussion goingon around the world about what ingredients should or shouldn't be in personalcare products, and how they should be regulated. We have a point of view thatwe've expressed, based on our considered understanding of the scienceinvolved, and that's always going to be our starting point. But what matters mostisn't what we think, it's what the people who use our products think. Johnson and Johnson didn't directly add formaldehyde to its baby products, however. Rather, the company used formaldehyde-releasing ingredients like the ammonia salt quaternium-15 to extend the shelf life ofmanyconsumer products, including baby shampoo. The Campaign for Safe Cosmetics and other consumer groups lauded Johnson & Johnson's decision to remove these formaldehyde-releasing ingredients from baby products as a "major victory for public health." However, some toxicology experts have dismissed concerns about formaldehyde-releasing ingredients in baby shampoo as form of hysteria. After all, it's a naturally-occurring chemical that our own bodies produces, Slate reports: The concern about formaldehyde inpersonal care productsreveals a bitofchemophobia, which Dartmouth chemistry professor Gordon Gribbledefines as"an irrational fear of chemicals based on ignorance of the facts." He says, "peopledon't know how small molecules are, and they believe that single molecules of somechemical pose a health threat." That's exactly the concern EWG expressed. "The actual molecule formaldehyde itselfis the carcinogen," says Johanna Congleton, toxicologist and senior scientist at EWG. "It doesn't matter if it's in a liquid or if you're inhaling particles with formaldehyde." In fact, the only studies that link formaldehyde to cancer are related to humansinhaling it, and inhaling large amounts of it. Funeral industry professionalswithmore than 34 years of experience or who had performed more than 500 embalmingsandfactory workers who spent yearsworking around formaldehyde before the1990s had higher risks for leukemia and Hodgkin's lymphoma. The amount ofexposure required to cause cancer is so high thatother studiesof factory workershavebeen inconclusive. Formaldehyde occurs naturally in common fruits and vegetables (even organic ones). "Unless people calling for removal of quaternium-15 are also keeping their childrenfrom eating apples and french fries," Hartings says, "I think their activism might bemisplaced." Our own bodies create formaldehyde as a normal byproduct during amino acidsynthesis andoverall metabolism, includingbreaking down antibioticsand othermedications. It's also in drinking water and the air we breathe. Homer Swei, a scientistat Johnson & Johnson, points out that 90 percent of the formaldehyde around us isnaturally occurring, with 60 percent of that coming from plants and trees, yet it's stillperfectly fine to walk through the woods. Further, the formaldehyde in synthetic ormanufactured products isno different in terms of chemical structurethan naturallyoccurring formaldehydeit's all CH2O. Nevertheless, Johnson & Johnson elected to remove formaldehyde-releasing ingredients from baby shampoo (and many other products) because of consumer fears. By early 2014, Johnson & Johnson had reformulated manyproducts, the New York Times reports: In doing so, the company is navigating a precarious path, investing tens ofmillions of dollars to remove the chemicals while at the same time insistingthat they are safe. The company is responding, executives said, to a fundamental shift inconsumer behavior, as an increasingly informed public demands thatcompanies be more responsive to their concerns, especially when it comesto the ingredients in their products. The complex effort carries both risks and rewards for the health care giant it requires difficult re-engineering of some of Johnson & Johnson's mostbeloved brands, but success in the marketplace could serve as a much-needed boost to acompany that has been batteredby a series ofembarrassing quality lapses and product recalls. In addition to reformulating many of its products, Johnson & Johnson also created a new website to provide consumers with information about its ingredients. Click here for that website. Comments Claim: Johnson & Johnson has removed formaldehyde from baby products like No More Tears shampoo.
Output:
Johnson & Johnson Removes Formaldehyde from Baby Products.