TASK DEFINITION: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
PROBLEM: outsider, what a passive/aggressive way to drag your nefarious beliefs towards sexual assault into a story. and how telling ...this "murderess" had a male counterpart which you fail to mention. this child tragically died of starvation....not sexual assault. another fail for you

SOLUTION: Yes

PROBLEM: Could you clarify, something for me? If a person is born with a penis and testes, it is male, right? And if a person is born with a vagina and a uteris, it is female, correct? As far as I know, the physical attributes each human is born with is not a matter of choice. After birth, humans have many years to make a decision as to what their sexuality will be or even may be born understanding what their sexuality will be at sexual maturity. Some may even identify as being a different sex than at birth. I agree that there are perhaps lesser or greater variations of bi-sexuality that permeate all human beings to a lesser or greater extent. The exploration and discovery about ourselves continues and will be either exciting or dreaded, depending on your views and experiences.

SOLUTION: Yes

PROBLEM: "What Zuckerberg has done is to substitute the largely uninformed opinions of one-third of the population as to what constitutes news for the judgments of thousands of trained journalists, most of whom have made collecting and reporting the news their careers."

These would be the 'judgments' of the 'trained journalists' who predicted Trump's winning the Republican nomination for President, right? How about predicting that Bernie Sanders would be anything more than a minor footnote in the contest against She Who Will soon be Anointed Queen of the Democrats? The 'trained journalists' score on that one?

Seems to me that the 'largely uninformed opinions' (I think of them as votes) left those 'trained journalists' with egg on their faces.

SOLUTION:
Yes