Categorize the comment on the basis of toxicity. If the comment is toxic (harmful, malicious, derogatory, threat, insult, identity attck, etc.) output Yes, otherwise output No.

Example Input: Revenue bonds are tied to the viability of a given project, and do not require backing of the PF. Stop being silly.
Example Output: Yes

Example Input: (off topic:griping about RG stories) this is a well done story. Good Job! meaty and a variety of informational input.
Example Output: No

Example Input: What is important is the the downward trajectory has been stopped...for now. But low prices are now taking a toll regardless of the tax structure.

What is also interesting is that Weilechowski was once a big advocate for tax credits. But now he's a critic. Why do you suppose this flip-flop?
Example Output:
No