Question:
Based on the premise "News groaned that Buchanan seems poised for another round of bashing the front-runner.", can we conclude that "The front-runner would soon be attacked by Buchanan."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
yes

Question: Sentence A: They cover a range of good government responsibilities that are fundamental to effectively executing any administration's program agenda.

Sentence B: They cover a great range of government responsibilities that are important to execute any agenda.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Question: The size of the mortality risk estimates from these epidemiological studies, the serious nature of the effect itself, and the high monetary value ascribed to prolonging life make mortality risk reduction the most important health endpoint quantified in this analysis.
The analysis does not discuss anything about premature mortality.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Problem: Here is a premise:
Lutterfield brought 'em in, eh?

Here is a hypothesis:
Lutterfield brought people in.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Sentence 1: Senior Partners for Justice is less than four months old, but already Ginsburg has some of the city's top lawyers working for some of the region's poorest clients.

Sentence 2: Senior Partners for Justice was formed on a Tuesday.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Premise:
"The Bastille was stormed the next day."
Hypothesis: The Bastille was stormed the following day.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
yes