[QUESTION] Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "A man assembles a tent while a woman sits and watches in a field of a large number of tent dwellers."
Hypothesis: "The man is setting up a foam pool."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
A man cannot assemble a tent if he is setting up a foam pool.
The answer is no.

Q: Given the sentence "A man a woman and a child sitting on a couch smiling." can we conclude that "The family is sitting in the restaurant eating dinner."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A: A couch is usually not wear people dine at a restaurant.
The answer is no.

QUESTION: If "A man sits at a table crowded with military merchandise." does that mean that "A man's extensive collection of military memorabilia is being displayed."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Let's solve it slowly: Sitting at a table with the merchandise does not imply this is his extensive collection.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

[QUESTION] Premise: "A lady in a red shirt walking down a sidewalk."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "The lady is swimming in a pool." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A lady cannot be swimming in a pool and walking down a sidewalk at the same time.
The answer is no.

Q: Premise: "There people sitting and standing on red carpet."
Hypothesis: "People are running on blue carpet."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
A: People cannot be sitting and standing while running. A carpet cannot be both red and blue.
The answer is no.

[QUESTION] Premise: "Several people stand on a bike rack to look at something over bleachers."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "Several people stand on a skateboard rack to look at something over bleachers." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A bike rack is not the same as a skateboard rack.
The answer is no.