In this task, you must classify if a given review is positive/negative, indicating your answer as P or N.

Ex Input:
trailing the success of brit humour in the movie industry with the likes of the semi - dramatic the commitments and the nearly slapstick a fish called wanda , the full monty is one film which delivered the depth of the former and the humour magnitude of the latter .
the film opens with a narrated documentary reel showing the improving economic and living standards of sheffield in the 60 's , then cut to the harsh reality of the present .
sheffield has become some sort of a semi - slum with the only visible increase in anything was the amount of layoffs from steel - factories ;
a once flourishing industry .
gaz ( carlyle ) spends most of his time in the worker 's club , a sort of place where jobless people sit around to wait for job offers .
he and his ' plump ' friend dave ( addy ) as well as their former foreman gerald ( wilkinson ) have been sitting around the club for months without any ' call for duty ' .
what seemingly was just a passing hard time for gaz suddenly transformed itself into desperation when he can not afford the 700 pounds of child - support money to his ex - wife .
suddenly finding himself facing the possiblity of losing custody of his son , he goes on to concoct an enterprising wild - idea to get the money he desperately requires .
dave and gerald too have problems of their own .
on top of his lack of employment , dave is also faced with the paranoia of his wife leaving him because of his current financial state as well as
his'plump ' appearance while gerald have been cheating on his wife by not telling her of his layoff for as long as 6 months , leaving home for ' work ' when he was actually a long - standing member of the worker 's club .
there we have it ; people with real problems and a not - so - practical solution for them .
gaz manages to get the support from them and sure enough they managed to get a few other poor jobless blokes to join in their gag : to perform a strip - act at the local pub .
in gaz 's own words while looking at an add for a strip - act featuring hunky ' beautiful ' men , ' if women are willing to pay for this , they sure as well will pay for real - men ' .
the full monty is very simple in nature and not a trace ambitious at all .
it is a small film which delves in the harsh - reality of unemployment and the desperation it drives people to .
it also is a very light movie to watch despite the theme it delves in because it has a lot of human - factor going for it .
never for once , was it trying to be manipulative at all , the full monty was true to itself all the way .
while the hilarity level of this film soared unexpectedly high , audience will find that they are in no way being cheated of a laugh , something lacking in many comedy films ( wannabes ? ) from hollywood .
other than carlyle , who acted as the psychotic begbie in trainspotting , the rest of the actors were definitely very new to me on - screen . however ,
the acting presented in this film is more than satisfying .
carlyle 's work here is a stark contrast to his character in trainspotting , implying real acting skill and flexibility on - screen
. kudos to the people involved in this film , especially to director peter cattaneo for being able to put together an excellent film which is has so much potential in ending up as your just - another - striptease .
already a critical and financial success for such a small film , the full monty is a humble film which deserves applause throughout .
while titanic managed to feast the eyes and soul in an epic way , the full monty gives one the same satisfaction ? ? . in half the time .

Ex Output:
P

Ex Input:
the most interesting thing about virus is that the title of the film does not refer to the clunky robotic animals that try to kill our heroes .
alas , it refers to our heroes !
as it turns out , the alien race that sends a computer virus to earth ( via the mir space station ) thinks of the human race as a virus -- perhaps even a cancer -- that needs to be eradicated before it spreads any further .
after all , we have taken up this entire planet , and if they let us live for another billion years or so , we might advance beyond our solar system and into the next one .
but the human race does n't have much to worry about .
after all , there 's a woman named foster ( jamie lee curtis )
out there stopping the computer virus .
she 's the chief navigator on a sea vessel ; travelling with her is captain everton ( donald sutherland ) , steve baker ( william baldwin ) , woods ( marshall bell ) , squeaky ( julio oscar mechoso ) , and richie ( sherman augustus ) .
they 're all sailing in a typhoon one lovely evening when they stumble across an enormous , abandoned russian satellite ship in international waters .
lucky for us , we already saw that the computer virus has taken over the ship and eliminated everyone on board .
the evil captain everton thinks he 's going to take the ship in and get a reward ; he convinces his crew that there 's going to be big money , so they try to salvage the ship .
soon , however , when it 's apparent that no one is on board and that the ship has no power , they realize that something bad must have happened .
finally , they meet nadia ( joanna pacula ) who explains their situation : a computer virus has taken over the ship !
it 's creating bio - mechanical life - forms to eliminate the human race !
virus is a truly dumb action thriller , one of negligible intelligence and innovation .
when considering the entire film , you will realize that it lacks a single original scene .
it 's a direct rip - off of nearly every james cameron film ( aliens , the abyss , and the terminator films are the most plagiarized ) ; more importantly , it 's basically the same movie as last year 's deep rising .
i liked deep rising simply because it 's funny
-- it knows it 's silly and derivative .
virus takes itself seriously .
and , in the most serious manner possible ,
it steals from every good and bad film of the genre , showing you countless familiar scenes , and sporting a cookie - cutter plot that any film of the sci - fi / horror genre could fit with a little trimming .
but what is so amazing about virus is how poorly the whole thing has been thought out .
okay , let me get this straight --
the alien race ( which is never really explained ) is basically sentient electricity .
they need to make themselves physical , so they use a space station to get onto a ship ( which is surrounded by water , but who cares about that ) .
on the ship , they make a bunch of clunky , immobile robots that somehow kill three hundred people .
after that , they start using the dead people to create half - human , half - machine creatures that look like the terminator but are much worse at walking around .
the leader , of course , is a big creature .
every film like this has a big creature at the end , but the big creature in virus is so big that it has to tear down the walls to move around .
virus is indeed a cliched film , but the central flaw lies in the fact that the computer virus just is n't very threatening .
it 's established that they can simply turn off the power to stop it , but the virus has sealed the power room by the time our heroes get there .
on one level , virus is almost passable fun .
it 's really gory , and a few of the scenes have interesting camp appeal ( the director , john bruno , worked on a lot of cameron 's films ) .
there 's also a nice array of actors , even though none of them do any acting
( except for donald sutherland , who does a lot of very bad acting ) .
the bottom line , however , is this : virus is a bad movie .
it rips off a lot of good movies that are worth seeing .
in that order , i recommend that you rent any one of the alien films , simply to admire the qualities of a creature that actually threatens our heroes .

Ex Output:
N

Ex Input:
welcome to your oh - so typical sequel .
it tries to be twice as big as it 's predecessor , yet ends up twice as shallow .
shallow . . .
.
hmm . . .
now there 's an idea .
maybe if the ill - fated cruise liner in this movie had struck a shallow reef early on things may have turned out better .
the first thing that struck me . . .
and surprised me , was that the camera work ( for the opening sequence anyway ) was terrible .
looked like the cameramen were drunk and kept tripping on their own feet . . . . . .
very different to the original movie .
the characters ?
well , not many of the characters actually * had * characters , but here 's a rundown .
annie , who was the highlight of the the original , must have seriously banged her head in the train crash at the end of the first movie .
why ?
because something 's got to account for her losing that many iq points .
even though annie was n't exactly a rocket scientist in speed , here some of her actions just make you want to beat your head against a wall .
for instance , after successfully using a chainsaw to cut a hole in a door so that a group of people can escape noxious gases - she stands in the middle of the opening for about five minutes till someone reminds her that the people ca n't get ut till she get
's the chainsaw out of their faces .
. .
. bang bang bang in point of fact sandra 's character is turned into little more than one of those scantly dressed extras from hercules , who constantly has to be rescued .
jason patric ?
all i can say is bring back keanu .
keanu reeves might have the emotional range of a tree stump . . .
but that 's one more tree stump than jason has .
i do n't think he changed facial expressions all movie - jason , smile for the cameras ! !
now frown ! . . .
i said frown . . . .
oh . . .
you are . . .
bang bang bang . .
wooden just does n't describe this guys performance , but it 'll have to do .
the bad guy .
. .
. . ahh . . .
william dafoe - there 's a bright move .
how can you go wrong with the star from that acknowledged classic , body of evidence ?
( yes , that is sarcasm ) .
his wide eyed maniac of a character does n't start out too bad . . . .
but goes steadily downhill
as the movie progresses .
in the end he degenerates to chasing annie around for a hostage , even though he already has the money and can escape . . . .
bang bang .
though i 'd like to give this movie a double thumbs down , there were some nice sequences .
considering the movie cost over 100 million dollars - you 'd hope there 'd be at least a couple .
the real eye - popper for me , even though it was given away in the trailer .
.
. . bang bang . . . .
.
was the sequence where the cruise liner sideswipes the oil tanker .
this looks terrific and i was very surprised to hear that the cruise liner in it was . . . .
completely computer generated !
wow . . . .
i do n't think i 've ever seen a cg model look so real before .
the sequence where jason patric in trying to disable the propellers from under the ship is also terrific , and the only time during the entire movie where you get that feeling of . . . .
speed .
this lack - of - speed problem affects many sequences .
such as the oil tanker part . . .
. .
it was -
" oh no , we 're going to hit the oil tanker ! " , 20 minutes later -
" oh no , we 're going to hit the oil tanker !
" 20 min . . . .
you get the point .
this movie failed simply because it did n't live up to it 's name . . . .
there was very little feeling of speed .
in the original movie , the lead characters had to make split second decisions to survive . . . . .
in this movie it felt more like - " well people , we 're gon na run into that there island in a few hours - i think i might stroll over to engineering and see if i ca n't turn off the engines .
. .
i 'm passing the cafeteria on the way , can i get anybody anything ?
"
the ending of this movie really is terrible .
even though it features what i 've since found out is one of the most expensive sequences ever in a movie - it just does n't work at all .
the part where the liner crashes through the town looks very realistic , but . .
. . surprise surprise - it just takes waaaaay too long .
it seemed to go for 15 minutes before the ship finally stopped .
one thing that struck me as extremely poor scriptiing was that as the ship crashes through the harbour and town , around 25 people are killed by the ship . . . .
and there 's
only 15 or so people left on the ship .
so when it stops safe and sound and the characters are all cheering - the audience is sitting back and thinking - " wait a sec . . .
this is a happy moment because ?
"
bang bang
then there was the dog . . . . .
i almost fell out of my seat when i saw the bit with the dog dodging the falling debris .
putting a dog in peril has become the ultimate hollywood cliche . . . . . .
every movie seems to have a ' dog - in - danger ' sequence - volcano , dante 's peak , independence day , daylight , twister .
lost world . . . . . .
etc , etc .
this movie is a perfect example of how not to make a sequel .
director jan de bont should try watching the orignal movie and this one back - to - back and see if he realises where he went wrong .

Ex Output:
N