TASK DEFINITION: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.
PROBLEM: Comment: The problem is really the accreditation of foreign trained physicians and specialists. This has nothing to do with the current Govt and has existed for years.

It's actually quite ridiculous that a foreign specialist educated and trained eg: At the University of Edinburgh (unquestionably a top rated school), who did a foreign residency cannot practice in Canada unless they complete a Canadian residency. But the number of residency positions is capped and many are taken by Canadians who studied abroad and returned to complete their residency in Canada. Worse - when they complete their residency, they are free to leave, no strings attached.

SOLUTION: Non-obscene

PROBLEM: Comment: Damn, Charles. You've done it again. Lovely story. Inspirational.

SOLUTION: Obscene

PROBLEM: Comment: Of course, the author of the petition and its vicious or clueless signatories don't care a damn about Gabbard's findings in Syria which challenges the lying narrative of the US in its quest for criminal regime change and breaking up of Syria. These same individuals call Bashar Assad, a popular leader in a sovereign country, a "brutal" "dictator', yet are totally at ease with Israel in its brutality and Saudi Arabia in its violent dictatorship!

SOLUTION:
Non-obscene