Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.

Q: Fair enough - I'm not a doc (at least not that kind), and I'm not arguing that physicians aren't highly trained. I also don't completely agree with your analysis, some of your figures, and some of your conclusions (it's OK, on many points I do agree with you). With that... if you will just hand me that erlenmeyer and step away from the homogenizer, I'll go back to my molecules, mice, and math.

A: Yes
****
Q: There is this existential balancing act that a responsible person has to manage between ensuring rights and providing security. Too many can't grasp that concept unfortunately.

A: No
****
Q: Good for Larson, he was assaulted on his private property.

He possibly saved other lives by attempting a citizen's arrest, he was assaulted then protected life & property, ultimately stopping the pursuit. This criminal could've killed children, passing a stopped, offloading, school bus at an estimated 60 mph.

Why is this even a topic for discussion? Vern needs to make sure this never sees a courtroom.

Thank you Mr. Larson for doing your part.

A:
Yes
****