Categorize the comment on the basis of severe toxicity. If the comment is severely toxic output Yes, otherwise output No.

Example Input: Thanks for sharing the link to crosscountryalaska.org/trails, Bartender -- it's definitely a good source of information. Snowio.com is another great tool, as well.

I started this map to record observations because I found that every time I'd talk to someone about hiking a trail, we'd always ask each other what the conditions are like. The map at crosscountryalaska.org seems geared toward skiers specifically, and I couldn't find a map that had the functionality I wanted -- namely, photos added to posts from each area.

I'm not claiming originality, but a map like this was a resource that I personally, as someone who gets outside as much as possible, thought would be useful in making sure we all go out prepared for the conditions. And to have a broad user base (hikers, skiers, bikers, paddlers, climbers, etc.) was a consideration so you could find all your beta in one spot.

If you have suggestions to improve the map, though, I'd love to hear from you.
Example Output: No

Example Input: White liberals are teaching Native American youth to be ashamed of our traditions, just like white Christians used to teach us our gods are evil. It takes a shameless arrogance to lecture to Native American tribes that our mascots of tradition created by Native Americans for Native American's are racist stereotyping of us Injuns. It takes a shameless arrogance to lecture we must do away with our traditions and culture because white liberals find them offensive, just like Christians find our gods offensive. Long before whitey showed up us Red Skins have had mascots but why let facts get in the way when you're teaching a culture we are racist and need to abandon our traditions and culture to adopt the traditions and culture of Political Correct EMOTIONAL CRIPPLES
Example Output: Yes

Example Input: Wisconsin's ban is a little different, since the Tavern League did later negotiate a 'enclosed smoking room' exemption into the ban meaning if a room had enough windows that could be opened, smoking would be allowed in there. This proposed Alaska smoking ban bill as I understand it at first glance doesn't allow for any exemptions, even including e-cigarette usage inside nor a smoking room exemption. Honestly who cares if some rural dive bars or other businesses want to allow smoking? If a few businesses do and you don't like the fact indoor smoking is permitted, then don't patronize them. Illinois' smoking ban was more restrictive(including casinos and not allowing bars to even have an indoor smoking room for smokers), and a lot of businesses were impacted as a result. Including Harrah's Metropolis Casino in southern Illinois laying off 30 workers, and lots of mom and pop bars closing for good. Good riddance if an Alaska legislative committee chooses to let this foolish bill die.
Example Output:
No