Premise:
"Soon to go on view in the archaeological park are reconstructed houses from various periods, including Canaanite dwellings built 5,000 years ago."
Hypothesis: The Canaanite dwellings were destroyed over 5,000 years ago for a reason, they were eyesores.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

no

input question: and i'll tell you we had some very unhappy people who were so unhappy with the service and resented paying fifteen percent tip when they had such poor service If this premise is true, does that tell us:"There were some people who were unhappy with the service."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: yes

Question:
Based on the premise "and well they weren't really that bad though when they were introduced were they", can we conclude that "They haven't changed since when they first appeared."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
no

Question: Sentence A: The optimistic The reforms will improve public perception of the IOC.

Sentence B: Some feel the reforms will improve the public and private perception of the IOC.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question: Such assertions also serve as an attempt to discount the need for meaningful reform to help prevent future accountability failures.
There rules currently in place are sufficient to prevent accountability failures.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Problem: Here is a premise:
Not all falsehoods, of course, are lies (the key ingredient in a lie is intentionality).

Here is a hypothesis:
All falsehoods are lie, regardless of intentionality.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer:
no