In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Q: Comment: PS: Had to look online and 2nd degree sexual assault in Hawaii is a class B felony punishable up to 25 years in prison. Fourth degree sexual assault is a misdemeanor. He was convicted of two counts of 2nd degree sexual assault which means if sentences run consecutively his prison sentence could possible be over 50 years. That fact that the girl Ferguson sexually assaulted was a minor requires the State judge to impose a long prison sentence, despite the fact his mother is the HGEA union boss.

A: Non-obscene
****
Q: Comment: Sigh ... sadly evoking a some commenters here on the R-G site who define every new Donald Trump revelation as simply losers whining about the results of the last election, I have to say, as the feces continues to move into the fan with the power and consistency of a conveyor belt, that (damn) if ever there was an agenda this country needed, it was the politics of Bernie Sanders. Reform systems skewed for the wealthiest 1%, reform the worst health care system in the developed nations, reform the economics of higher education, and do what we can to halt the human damage to our planet. Hindsight and all that; and (damn) I didn't even vote for him in the primary.

A: Obscene
****
Q: Comment: PERA's antiquated investment strategy has not helped returns. Index funds have beaten the old pension asset allocation models for many years. College endowments and more enlightened state pension funds are switching large chunks of assets to passive investments. The projected 7.25% return, weighed down as it will be by large investments in fixed income investments, is wildly unrealistic. There is no reason to keep more than two or three years of pension obligations invested in fixed income assets. There is also zero justification to invest in foreign stocks. That diversification argument was destroyed years ago. If the US stock market catches a cold, the rest of the world will be coming down with double pneumonia. This ain't rocket science.

It was surprising not to see coverage of PERA's multi-million dollar slush fund for small business. This is PERA's lame attempt to pick winners and losers, something governments have never been particularly successful at doing.

A:
Non-obscene
****