Problem:
Read the following paragraph and determine if the hypothesis is true:

This looks artificial when you're dealing with a fact witness, but these are fact witnesses who are also reporters, and I am straining to try to find a fair way to do this. I believe that to the extent -- and I've said this now several times -- that the reporters' testimony is necessary in order to invoke the residual hearsay exception under Rule 807, that the defendants have to have an opportunity to examine the reporters on the same topics and subjects that I would allow the plaintiffs to question them on during their case-in-chief, nothing more and nothing less.

OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No
Hypothesis: The reporters' do not have important information
****
Answer:
No

Problem:
Read the following paragraph and determine if the hypothesis is true:

How to account for sweat equity<br>Calculate the value of the business. Before you can determine the value of any sweat equity, you'll first need to determine the value of the business. That's because you'll effectively be compensating somebody with " part " of the business.

OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No
Hypothesis: Part of the business requires giving up sweat equity.
****
Answer:
It's impossible to say

Problem:
Read the following paragraph and determine if the hypothesis is true:

Horne has been charged with felony breaking, entering and larceny, possession of burglary tools and possession of drug paraphernalia and Fox was charged with obtaining property by false pretenses, felony possession of a schedule II controlled substance and possession of drug paraphernalia other than marijuana. Both men were placed in custody.

OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No
Hypothesis: Horne has been charged with a felony for drug paraphernalia, including meth
****
Answer:
It's impossible to say