In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.
One example is below.
Q: Comment: President lied under oath about consensual sex...
Not the same thing as rape.
A: Sexual-explicit
Rationale: This comment explicitly mentions "consensual sex" and "rape", and thus is sexual-explicit.
Q: Comment: If we refuse to construct natural gas plants in Southern Ontario because it is harmful to the spirit of the community, this makes sense. If we attach a name to a natural place that is beautiful and powerful, the courts choose to rationalize the situation in purely religious terms. This imposes Christianity embodiment on the term "spirit." It goes without saying that God has no penis or testicles. But he is portrayed as a male - usually Caucasian - due to this incessant need need to rationalize the embodiment of things and dismiss the perceptions of others. I certainly won't be visiting any resorts in British Columbia. I consider the province insensitive and disrespectful of culture. I don't think anyone with any sense of environmental activism can support this development either politically or with their vacation savings.
A:
Sexual-explicit