input: Make use of the article to answer the questions. "How did Norman know, Sister Emma?"

"He overheard you and Aryan arguing. I suspect that he purposely overheard on you. Norman knew or concluded what profession Aryan practiced. He might well have followed Aryan on his explorations. Whether he did or not is beside the point. When Aryan came back yesterday afternoon, Norman certainly decided that he had made some find, for Aryan told Norman that he would be leaving for the capital to meet the detective the next morning. He probably followed Aryan to your room and overheard what passed between you.

"Since you could not act against the law of man and God, he would serve a natural justice in his own way. He took the jar of poison hemlock from the chemistry shop and when Aryan asked for a drink, he supplied it. Norman did not know the precise quantity needed and so Aryan did not suffer the full effects until after the bell called the community into the dining hall for the evening meal."

Abbess was following Sister Emma closely.

"And then?"

"Then I began my investigation, and then the detective arrived seeking Aryan for an explanation for his death."

"But who killed Norman?"

"Norman knew that sooner or later he would be discovered. But more importantly in his guileless mind there was also the guilt of having taken a man's life to be considered. Norman was a simple man. He decided that he should accept the punishment--the honor-price of a life. What greater honor-price for the life of Aryan could he offer than his own? He also took a draught of poison hemlock."

There was a pause. 1. What is the name of the poison that was used?
2. Who used the poison?
3. Who did he use it on?
4. How did he poison him?
5. Was the effect of the poison immediate?
6. Why not?
7. When Aryan finally feel the effects of the poison?
8. Who was being followed?
9. How did Norman die?
10. Who is doing the investigation?
numbered_answers: 1. Hemlock
2. Norman
3. Aryan
4. in a drink
5. no
6. Norman didn't know the precise quantity
7. Evening meet
8. aryan
9. unknown
10. norma

input: Make use of the article to answer the questions. CHAPTER VIII

She took her letters up to her room with her, having persuaded her mother to go to bed directly Mr. Hilbery left them, for so long as she sat in the same room as her mother, Mrs. Hilbery might, at any moment, ask for a sight of the post. A very hasty glance through many sheets had shown Katharine that, by some coincidence, her attention had to be directed to many different anxieties simultaneously. In the first place, Rodney had written a very full account of his state of mind, which was illustrated by a sonnet, and he demanded a reconsideration of their position, which agitated Katharine more than she liked. Then there were two letters which had to be laid side by side and compared before she could make out the truth of their story, and even when she knew the facts she could not decide what to make of them; and finally she had to reflect upon a great many pages from a cousin who found himself in financial difficulties, which forced him to the uncongenial occupation of teaching the young ladies of Bungay to play upon the violin.

But the two letters which each told the same story differently were the chief source of her perplexity. She was really rather shocked to find it definitely established that her own second cousin, Cyril Alardyce, had lived for the last four years with a woman who was not his wife, who had borne him two children, and was now about to bear him another. This state of things had been discovered by Mrs. Milvain, her aunt Celia, a zealous inquirer into such matters, whose letter was also under consideration. Cyril, she said, must be made to marry the woman at once; and Cyril, rightly or wrongly, was indignant with such interference with his affairs, and would not own that he had any cause to be ashamed of himself. Had he any cause to be ashamed of himself, Katharine wondered; and she turned to her aunt again. 1. What might Mrs. Hilbery request to see?
2. Who had written to Katharine?
3. What job did the cousin have?
4. Teaching whom?
5. To do what?
6. Has Cyril had children while unmarried?
7. Will he soon have another?
8. How many children will he then have in total with the woman?
9. Who had found out that Cyril was unmarried?
10. What relation is Mrs. Milvain to Katharine?
11. True of False: Aunt Celia wishes to force Cyril to marry.
12. What had Katharine convinced her mother to do?
13. How many poems did had Rodney written in the letter?
14. What kind of poem?
15. Was the cousin strapped for cash?
16. Was Cyril ashamed to be unmarried?
17. Did Cyril believe he had reason to be ashamed?
18. Did the two letters tell similar tales?
19. Was Katharine surprised by the information about Cyril?
20. For how many years had Cyril lived with the mother of his children?
numbered_answers: 1. a sight of the post.
2. Rodney
3. teaching
4. young ladies
5. to play upon the violin.
6. yes
7. yes
8. Three
9. Mrs. zmilvain
10. her aunt
11. true
12. unknown
13. Two
14. a sonnet
15. yes
16. indignant
17. no
18. yes
19. yes
20. Four

input: Make use of the article to answer the questions. Protagoras was among the great teachers of ancient Athens. He taught many subjects, including the laws of argument and the right use of language. It is said that he was the first teacher to accept money for his services.

A student, Evalthus, heard of this famous teacher and asked him to give him lessons. However, Evalthus didn't want to pay for his lessons at once, and after some discussion it was finally agreed between them that Evalthus should pay only if he won his first case in the court. For if he won, it would prove that he had been taught well.

The lessons began and Evalthus proved himself to be a good student. But he refused to pay Protagoras anything at the end of his studies.

Protagoras therefore took Evalthus to the court and told the judges that he wanted his money. He explained that he must be paid whether he won or lost the case. "Whatever you decide," he declared to the judges, " I must be paid. For if you decide in my fovor , then I win the case, and so I must be paid . But If you decide against me, then Evalthus has won his first case in the court; according to our agreement, he must pay his lessons. Therefore I shall get my money whatever happens."

The Athenian judges found no fault in it, so they asked Evalthus to reply.

"No, it's quite clear," said Evalthus, " that I need not pay. If the judged decide in my favor, then I have won the case, and I need not to pay. But if Protagoras wins, then I have lost my first case. Therefore, according to our agreement, I do not have to pay. So I need not pay in any event."

As both arguments appeared to be faultless, the judges were unable to come to a decision. They therefore ordered the two men to appear before them again one hundred years later. 1. Who took Evalthus to court?
2. Who was Protagoras?
3. What was he the first teacher to do?
4. Who was Evalthus?
5. What did he ask Protagoras to do?
6. Did Evalthus pay right away?
7. When did he say he'd pay?
8. What did Protagoras explain to the judges about getting paid?
9. Were the judges able to come to a decision?
10. When were the two supposed to come back?
11. Was Evalthus a bad student?
12. What did he refuse to do?
13. Why weren't the judges able to make a decision?
numbered_answers:
1. Protagoras
2. a teacher of ancient Athens.
3. accept money for his services
4. A student
5. give him lessons
6. No
7. once won his first case in the court
8. he must be paid whether he won or lost
9. No
10. one hundred years later
11. Yes
12. he refused to pay
13. both arguments were faultless