In this task, you are given text for US Congressional and California state bills, your task is to generate a summary for this bill.

Example input: SECTION 1. LIABILITY OF BUSINESS ENTITIES PROVIDING USE OF FACILITIES
TO NONPROFIT ORGANIZATIONS.

(a) Definitions.--In this section:
(1) Business entity.--The term ''business entity'' means a
firm, corporation, association, partnership, consortium, joint
venture, or other form of enterprise.
(2) Facility.--The term ''facility'' means any real
property, including any building, improvement, or appurtenance.
(3) Gross negligence.--The term ''gross negligence'' means
voluntary and conscious conduct by a person with knowledge (at
the time of the conduct) that the conduct is likely to be
harmful to the health or well-being of another person.
(4) Intentional misconduct.--The term ''intentional
misconduct'' means conduct by a person with knowledge (at the
time of the conduct) that the conduct is harmful to the health
or well-being of another person.
(5) Nonprofit organization.--The term ''nonprofit
organization'' means--
(A) any organization described in section 501(c)(3)
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and exempt from
tax under section 501(a) of such Code; or
(B) any not-for-profit organization organized and
conducted for public benefit and operated primarily for
charitable, civic, educational, religious, welfare, or
health purposes.
(6) State.--The term ''State'' means each of the several
States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto
Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, the Northern
Mariana Islands, any other territory or possession of the
United States, or any political subdivision of any such State,
territory, or possession.
(b) Limitation on Liability.--
(1) In general.--Subject to subsection (c), a business
entity shall not be subject to civil liability relating to any
injury or death occurring at a facility of the business entity
in connection with a use of such facility by a nonprofit
organization if--
(A) the use occurs outside of the scope of business
of the business entity;
(B) such injury or death occurs during a period
that such facility is used by the nonprofit
organization; and
(C) the business entity authorized the use of such
facility by the nonprofit organization.
(2) Application.--This subsection shall apply--
(A) with respect to civil liability under Federal
and State law; and
(B) regardless of whether a nonprofit organization
pays for the use of a facility.
(c) Exception for Liability.--Subsection (b) shall not apply to an
injury or death that results from an act or omission of a business
entity that constitutes gross negligence or intentional misconduct,
including any misconduct that--
(1) constitutes a crime of violence (as that term is
defined in section 16 of title 18, United States Code) or act
of international terrorism (as that term is defined in section
2331 of title 18) for which the defendant has been convicted in
any court;
(2) constitutes a hate crime (as that term is used in the
Hate Crime Statistics Act (28 U.S.C. 534 note));
(3) involves a sexual offense, as defined by applicable
State law, for which the defendant has been convicted in any
court; or
(4) involves misconduct for which the defendant has been
found to have violated a Federal or State civil rights law.
(d) Superseding Provision.--
(1) In general.--Subject to paragraph (2) and subsection
(e), this Act preempts the laws of any State to the extent that
such laws are inconsistent with this Act, except that this Act
shall not preempt any State law that provides additional
protection from liability for a business entity for an injury
or death with respect to which conditions under subparagraphs
(A) through (C) of subsection (b)(1) apply.
(2) Limitation.--Nothing in this Act shall be construed to
supersede any Federal or State health or safety law.
(e) Election of State Regarding Nonapplicability.--This Act shall
not apply to any civil action in a State court against a business
entity in which all parties are citizens of the State if such State
enacts a statute--
(1) citing the authority of this subsection;
(2) declaring the election of such State that this Act
shall not apply to such civil action in the State; and
(3) containing no other provision.
Example output: Shields a business entity from civil liability relating to any injury or death occurring at a facility of that entity in connection with a use of such facility by a nonprofit organization if: (1) the use occurs outside the scope of business of the business entity; (2) such injury or death occurs during a period that such facility is used by such organization; and (3) the business entity authorized the use of such facility by the organization.
Makes this Act inapplicable to an injury or death that results from an act or omission of a business entity that constitutes gross negligence or intentional misconduct, including misconduct that: (1) constitutes a hate crime or a crime of violence or act of international terrorism for which the defendant has been convicted in any court; or (2) involves a sexual offense for which the defendant has been convicted in any court or misconduct for which the defendant has been found to have violated a Federal or State civil rights law.
Preempts State laws to the extent that such laws are inconsistent with this Act, except State law that provides additional protection from liability. Specifies that this Act shall not be construed to supersede any Federal or State health or safety law.
Makes this Act inapplicable to any civil action in a State court against a business entity in which all parties are citizens of the State if such State, citing this Act's authority and containing no other provision, enacts a statute declaring the State's election that this Act shall not apply to such action in the State.
Example explanation: This Bill focuses on shielding business entities from civil liability relating to an injury or death depending on the conditions of injury, hence the generated summary is correct.
Q: SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ''Integrity of the United States
Courts Act of 2003''.

SEC. 2. JUDICIAL REVIEW OF BINATIONAL PANEL AND COMMITTEE DECISIONS.

(a) In General.--Subtitle A of title IV of the North American Free
Trade Agreement Implementation Act (19 U.S.C. 3431 et seq.) is amended
by inserting after section 404 the following new section:

''SEC. 404A. REVIEW OF BINATIONAL PANEL AND COMMITTEE DETERMINATIONS.

''(a) Basis for Review in Court of International Trade.--
''(1) In general.--If, within 30 days after publication in
the Federal Register of notice that a binational panel or
committee has issued a determination following a review under
article 1904 of a decision of a competent investigating
authority in the United States, a Party or person, referred to
in paragraph 5 of article 1904, alleges that--
''(A)(i) the determination of the panel or
committee, as the case may be, was based on a
misinterpretation of United States law,
''(ii) a member of a panel or committee was guilty
of gross misconduct, bias, or a serious conflict of
interest, or otherwise materially violated the rules of
conduct established for panelists or committee members,
respectively,
''(iii) the panel or committee seriously departed
from a fundamental rule of procedure, or
''(iv) the panel or committee manifestly exceeded
its powers, authority, or jurisdiction set out in
article 1904, such as failing to apply the appropriate
standard of review, and
''(B) any element described in subparagraph (A) has
materially affected the decision of the panel or
committee and threatens the integrity of the binational
panel or committee review process,
then such party or person may file an appeal with the United
States Court of International Trade, seeking review of the
binational panel or committee determination pursuant to section
516A of the Tariff Act of 1930.
''(2) Review in court of international trade where
binational panel or committee does not act.--
''(A) In general.--If a request for a panel or
committee review has been made under article 1904, and
a panel or committee, as the case may be, is not
convened within 120 days after the request, a person,
referred to in paragraph 5 of article 1904, may
commence an action in the United States Court of
International Trade contesting the determination with
respect to which the request was filed. The
commencement of such an action shall be in accordance
with paragraph (1) or (2) of section 516A(a) of the
Tariff Act of 1930, notwithstanding the 30-day
limitation on the commencement of actions set forth in
such section 516A.
''(B) Requests by other persons.--After an action
is commenced under subparagraph (A), any other person
may commence an action in accordance with the
requirements of paragraph (1) or (2) of section 516A(a)
of the Tariff Act of 1930 within 30 days after the date
the initial action is filed under this paragraph, but
only with respect to a claim that such person raised
before the panel or committee.
''(b) Decisions of the Court.--
''(1) In general.--In an appeal filed under subsection
(a)(1) for review of a binational panel or committee
determination, the Court of International Trade shall, after
examining the legal and factual analysis underlying the
findings and conclusions of the decision of the panel or
committee, as the case may be, determine whether any of the
elements described in subsection (a)(1)(A) has been
established. If the court finds that any of the elements has
been established, the court shall vacate the original panel or
committee decision and enter judgment accordingly. If the
elements are not established, the court shall affirm the
original binational panel or committee decision. Decisions of
the Court of International Trade under this paragraph shall be
binding on the parties with respect to the matters between the
parties that were before the panel or committee, as the case
may be.
''(2) Decisions where panel or committee not convened.--In
the case of an action for review of a determination filed under
subsection (a)(2), the Court of International Trade shall
conduct such review under section 516A(b) of the Tariff Act of
1930. Decisions of the Court of International Trade under this
paragraph shall be binding on all parties with respect to the
matters between the parties that would have been before a panel
or committee had the panel or committee been convened.
''(c) Exclusive Jurisdiction.--If a Party or person, referred to in
paragraph 5 of article 1904, timely files a notice of appeal to the
Court of International Trade pursuant to this section, the United
States Court of International Trade shall have exclusive jurisdiction
over the matter, and the determination of the United States Court of
International Trade shall not be subject to review by an extraordinary
challenge committee or binational panel.
''(d) Applicability.--This section applies to determinations by a
binational panel or committee under NAFTA that involves an antidumping
duty or countervailing duty determination of a competent investigating
authority in the United States.''.
(b) Conforming Amendment.--The table of contents of the North
American Free Trade Implementation Act is amended by inserting after
the item relating to section 404 the following:

''404A. Review of binational panel and committee determinations.''.

SEC. 3. JURISDICTION OF THE COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE.

Section 516A of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1516a) is
amended--
(1) in subsection (a)(2)--
(A) in subparagraph (A)(i)(I), by striking ''or
(viii)'' and inserting ''(viii), (ix), or (x)''; and
(B) in subparagraph (B), by adding at the end the
following:
''(ix) A final determination of a
binational panel convened pursuant to article
1904 of the NAFTA.
''(x) A final determination described in
section 404A(a)(2) of the North American Free
Trade Agreement Implementation Act.'';
(2) in subsection (a)(5), in the matter preceding
subparagraph (A), by inserting ''(other than a determination
described in subsection (g)(3)(A)(vii))'' after ''apply''; and
(3) in subsection (g)(3)(A)--
(A) in clause (v), by striking ''or'' at the end;
(B) in clause (vi), by striking the period and
inserting '', or''; and
(C) by adding at the end the following:
''(vii) a determination of which either a
Party or person, referred to in paragraph 5 of
article 1904 of the NAFTA, has requested review
pursuant to section 404A of the North American
Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act.''.

SEC. 4. APPLICATION TO CANADA AND MEXICO.

Pursuant to article 1902 of the North American Free Trade Agreement
and section 408 of the North American Free Trade Agreement
Implementation Act, the amendments made by this Act shall apply with
respect to goods from Canada and Mexico.

SEC. 5. EFFECTIVE DATE.

The amendments made by this Act shall apply to--
(1) any final determination of a binational panel or
committee convened pursuant to article 1904 of the North
American Free Trade Agreement, notice of which is published in
the Federal Register on or after the date of enactment of this
Act; and
(2) any request for panel or committee review to which
section 404A(a)(2) of the North American Free Trade Agreement
Implementation Act applies that is pending on or after the date
of enactment of this Act.
A:
Integrity of the United States Courts Act of 2003 - Amends the North American Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act to permit a party or person to file with the U.S. Court of International Trade an appeal of a determination of a binational panel or committee, alleging that a panel or committee determination was based on a misinterpretation of U.S. law, a member of a binational panel or committee is guilty of gross misconduct, bias, or serious conflict of interest, or that the panel or committee seriously departed from a fundamental rule of procedure or exceeded its own authority, and such actions have materially affected panel or committee determinations with respect to antidumping and countervailing duty cases and threaten the integrity of the panel or committee review process. Authorizes a person to commence an action in the U.S. Court of International Trade if such person has requested a panel or committee review of an antidumping or countervailing duty determination, but such panel or committee is not convened within 120 days. Amends the Tariff Act of 1930 to grant the U.S. Court of International Trade jurisdiction over the review of a final determination of a binational panel or an investigating authority.Declares that the amendments made by this Act with respect to antidumping and countervailing duty law shall apply to goods from Canada and Mexico.