Q: Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "Boy in yellow tank top laughing on a beach."
Hypothesis: "A boy laughing at the sounds on the beach."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
A: it is not possible to tell
Chain-of-thought: Laughing does not imply it is at the sounds on the beach.

Q: If "Four shirtless men hike up a canyon." does that mean that "Four men are walking down the beach."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A: no
Chain-of-thought: One cannot hike up a canyon and walk down the beach simultaneously.

Q: Can we conclude from "Several children pet a pig while a crowd watches." that "Children are happily eating ice cream."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
A: no
Chain-of-thought: If children are eating ice cream it is logical to assume they cannot pet a pig.

Q: Premise: "Sunbathers frolic on the beach under a bright sun."
Hypothesis: "There are no sunbathers on the beach."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A: no
Chain-of-thought:
There either are or are not sunbathers on the beach; it is not possible for them to be both present and absent at the same time.