Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.

[EX Q]: In other words, continue time-honored Eugene City Council and Mayor traditions.

Although you did forget to make sure the high-speed internet connections were also to be provided at taxpayer expense, you know. Not to worry, the Mayor and Council have no real power and authority, the City Manager will take care of it.
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: What a pathetic waste of taxpayer dollars on this nonsensical criminalization of marijuana. Statistically alcohol causes many greater social problems. This man is not a threat to society. If they are determined to keep it illegal, then impose fines or something along those lines rather than locking people up. These arcane "lock 'em up" policies are simply fuel for the industrial prison complexes and those who profit from them. I personally choose not to use any intoxicants but I'm disgusted by the hypocrisy that some mind-altering drugs, like alcohol, can be openly promoted and sold, while others, like marijuana, are selectively enforced as a criminal substance.
[EX A]: Yes

[EX Q]: But if the government shuts down, how will your oily masters keep getting the giveaways that they in turn use to pay you to make ADN comments? Not that I wouldn't love to see you in line for the dole. Now THAT would be entertainment.
[EX A]:
Yes