Kids pretending to fly are not necessarily pretending to be the Wright Brothers.
The question and answer are below.
Premise: "Two kids in a field with their arms out pretending to be airplanes."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "Kids pretending to be the wright brothers." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
it is not possible to tell
A small child and small kid are equivalent and using a stylus means using a technological device.
The question and answer are below.
Given the sentence "A small child wearing a yellow shirt is using a stylus while sitting on something red." is it true that "A little kid is sitting and using a technological device via a stylus."?
yes
A girl could be a girl in a red shirt and brown pants.. So what could be the question?
Question followed by answer: Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "A girl in a red shirt and brown pants is skating."
Hypothesis: "A girl is skating."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
yes
The woman in the black shirt is looking for a romance novel.
The question and answer are below.
Can we conclude from "A woman wearing a black shirt browses through a book at a store." that "The woman is looking for a romance novel."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
it is not possible to tell
No can talk on cellphone with his/her tongue inside the mouth.
The question and answer are below.
Can we conclude from "A man wearing a cowboy hat and a blue striped shirt sticks out his tongue as he is on his cellphone." that "A man is on his cellphone."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
yes
They may not be taking off because of the girl .
The question and answer are below.
Premise: "A picture of pigeons taking off with a young girl in the distant background."
Hypothesis: "The pigeons took off because of the girl."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
it is not possible to tell