Premise:
"After all, he has suffered through legal hell once and has emerged unaffected."
Hypothesis: He has gone through varying levels of the court system, and has come out unscathed.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

yes

input question: Otherwise, follow the canal along the pretty country road (route S 11) to Padua (Padova). If this premise is true, does that tell us:"There is a country road that goes to Padua."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: yes

Question:
Based on the premise "if they're the kind of people that commit these excuse me grotesque crimes and have done it over and over and over again you don't reform those kind of people", can we conclude that "You can't reform repeat offenders of grotesque crimes."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
yes

Question: Sentence A: It is equivalent to CBO's NIPA projection for Transfers, Grants, and Subsidies less Health, OASDI, and other discretionary spending.

Sentence B: It costs the same as the NIPA items.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Question: The party described in the Slate piece was intended to signify Medavoy's triumph over new wife, new job, and so on.
The party was to celebrate Medavoy getting a great new life.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Problem: Here is a premise:
China today boasts some 20 missiles that could hit the United States and is working to supplement that force with more survivable, mobile launchers.

Here is a hypothesis:
China has no missiles in their arsenals.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer:
no