Canoe Trip<br>One day I went to the Everglades with my friends. We went on a canoe trip through the many swamps. I looked over and saw an alligator that was as long as our canoe. Everyone was very nervous but the alligator just ignored us. Afterwards we all had great stories to tell about our canoe trip.
The alligator did not attack the group. OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No
A: Yes
input hypothesis: UBC professor taking political leaders to court for relations with climate change.
Context: Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window) Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window) Youth take political leaders to court to accelerate fight against global warming CBC Radio's The Current interviewed David Boyd, a UBC professor and environmental lawyer, for a segment about youth taking political leaders to court for cases related to climate change. He discussed how litigation is a tool worth using in the fight against climate change. The segment starts at 39:10.
OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No
true or false: Yes
Context:
Double Whammy is a 1987 novel by Carl Hiaasen. The protagonist, a private investigator, is hired to expose a celebrity bass fisherman as a cheat and is drawn into a frame-up for murder. The book introduced the character of "Skink" (Clinton Tyree), who becomes a recurring character in Hiaasen's subsequent novels.
Hypothesis: Double Whammy is exciting to read. OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No
It's impossible to say
Input: OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No

Breaking Up<br>Tom hated his girlfriend. He kept trying to break up with her. She never really let him. Tom eventually moved away. He ignored her completely.

Sentence: Tom's girl was really in loved with him .

Output: It's impossible to say
Problem:
Read the following paragraph and determine if the hypothesis is true:

Hon. members will know that this official opposition attaches great importance to ensuring that parliament clearly states its intent in any bill that we consider or that we adopt, because if we do not, and the government is often sloppy in this area, we simply hand jurisdiction by default over to the courts, and that has been done far too many times.

OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No
Hypothesis: Jurisdiction handed over to the courts has been done many times.
****
Answer:
Yes
Well, I think again that illustrates why the authority is vested in Congress to make these judgments rather than in courts to make these affect whether the judgments, because we're not talking about the effect on an individual author, or an individual creator. What the Framers of the Constitution were concerned about is a gross judgment with respect to what might generally provide incentives to the population --
Congress has not never been given any power to make judgements. OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No
A:
No