I'm not sure which e-mail address you are using so I figured I'd send to both. Here is my itinerary for Christmas travel: Friday 12/24 Continental 4126 Leaves Houston 7:55 am Arrives Cincinnati 11:20 am Sunday 12/26 Continentat 4122 Leaves Cincinnati 5:45 pm Arrives Houston 7:25 pm These are Continental Express flights - I don't know if that makes a difference in terminals in Cincinnati or not - it does in Houston. I got your message at home, my SSN is *********
Answer: Christmas flights
Here is an email: This project has been noticed by FERC (CP01-422). Adds 906,626 dth/day (845,500 Mcf) of capacity from Opal, WY to delivery points primarily in California. Service commencing 5/1/2003. Incremental rates and fuel. Seventeen shippers have signed 18 long-term agreements (10 or 15 years) and 95% has primary delivery points in California, mostly for existing and new power generation. Any issues? Are we a shipper? Comments and interventions are due Aug. 29th. Since I will be in D.C. that week, need your input by Aug. 23rd. We are downloading a copy of the filing (392 pages). Let me know if you would like a copy.
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: Kern River 2003 Expansion Project
Q: PRELIMINARY EARTHQUAKE REPORT Rapid Earthquake Location Service U.S. Geological Survey, Menlo Park, California U.C. Berkeley Seismological Laboratory, Berkeley, California Version 2: Updates lower and earlier versions of this earthquake report A LIGHT EARTHQUAKE OCCURRED AT 10:33 AM PDT Monday, Jul 02, 2001. THE MAGNITUDE 4.1 (ML) EVENT IS LOCATED 7 MILES S OF TRES PINOS, CA THE HYPOCENTRAL DEPTH IS 3.9 MILES. This event has been reviewed by Steve Walter - USGS. PRINCIPAL EARTHQUAKE PARAMETERS
Propose a subject line
A: [EDIS] EARTHQUAKE INFORMATION [News: Statewide]
IN: Clem: I know that you sent Sheila Glover a form of ENE guaranty a few weeks ago. Sheila forwarded it to Bear and we received Bear's form which is unacceptable. However, if ENE has outstanding guaranties in favor of Bear, I would need to know since we may be able to use a previously negotiated form. Can you let me know if ENE has ever issued such a guaranty? Thanks. SS

Generate a subject line.

OUT: Bear Stearns Companies, Inc. and all affiliates ("Bear")
IN: This is an email
The meeting yesterday with about 7 small producers in Okla went fairly well. It is obvious that they now realize that the cost of processing, if necessary is there obligation, not Northerns. We heard the same rhetoric about the history, for the past 30 years it is has been a "wet" system and they entered into contracts without any processing obligations. Northern' can't change due to this and historical operation and "unwaive" the high c6+ based on the highest receipt levels. They (Dan?? ) was very insistent that if a problem occurred, all shippers should be pro rated and NNG's tariff should be enforced at the tailgate of the Bushton plant, not the point of receipt as the tariff currently states. They asked us to file to change, potentially incorporate a default processing agreement that had to be used in the event of high concentrations of C6+-- I think you get the drift of the discussions-- don't just cut my gas, cut everyone

What is the subject?

OUT: Producer meeting
I have some of your mail and I am not sure of your location. If you would like to stop by ESC06406 and pick it up or give me a call and I can forward it to your assistant that would be great. Thanks,
Answer:
Mail