Based on the information present in the given passage, you need to write a correct answer to the given question. A correct answer is one that correctly and completely answers the question. Do not write answers that address the question partially or incorrectly. The correct answer must be contained in the given paragraph.

Input: Consider Input: Paragraph- Sent 1: Electric charge is a physical property.
Sent 2: It occurs between particles or objects.
Sent 3: It causes them to attract or repel each other.
Sent 4: They do not even have to touch.
Sent 5: This is unlike the typical push or pull you may be familiar with.
Sent 6: All electric charge is based on the protons and electrons in atoms.
Sent 7: A proton has a positive electric charge.
Sent 8: An electron has a negative electric charge.
Sent 9: Forces on Charged Objects Most atoms are balanced electrically.
Sent 10: They have the same number of positive and negative charges.
Sent 11: Therefore, the number of protons equals the number of electrons.
Sent 12: Neutrons do not matter as they have no charge.
Sent 13: When an object loses some electrons, it becomes positively charged.
Sent 14: There are now more protons than electrons inside the atom.
Sent 15: The lost electrons may remain free.
Sent 16: Or, they may attach to another object.
Sent 17: The new object now has more electrons than protons.
Sent 18: It then becomes negatively charged.
Question: What physical property occurs between particles and objects?.

Output: A physical property between particles and objects is an electrical charge.

Input: Consider Input: Paragraph- Sent 1: As Philip marched south, his opponents blocked him near Chaeronea, Boeotia.
Sent 2: During the ensuing Battle of Chaeronea, Philip commanded the right wing and Alexander the left, accompanied by a group of Philip's trusted generals.
Sent 3: According to the ancient sources, the two sides fought bitterly for some time.
Sent 4: Philip deliberately commanded his troops to retreat, counting on the untested Athenian hoplites to follow, thus breaking their line.
Sent 5: Alexander was the first to break the Theban lines, followed by Philip's generals.
Sent 6: Having damaged the enemy's cohesion, Philip ordered his troops to press forward and quickly routed them.
Sent 7: With the Athenians lost, the Thebans were surrounded.
Sent 8: Left to fight alone, they were defeated.
Sent 9: After the victory at Chaeronea, Philip and Alexander marched unopposed into the Peloponnese, welcomed by all cities; however, when they reached Sparta, they were refused, but did not resort to war.
Sent 10: At Corinth, Philip established a "Hellenic Alliance" (modeled on the old anti-Persian alliance of the Greco-Persian Wars), which included most Greek city-states except Sparta.
Sent 11: Philip was then named Hegemon (often translated as "Supreme Commander") of this league (known by modern scholars as the League of Corinth), and announced his plans to attack the Persian Empire.
Question: Who were members of the League of Corinth when Philip announced his plans to attack the Persians?.

Output: Most Greek city states.

Input: Consider Input: Paragraph- Sent 1: You write: "Having created the desired impression, Moore follows with his Heston interview."Sent 2: No, he doesn't.
Sent 3: You accuse Moore so often of changing the chronology, yet you have no problems changing it yourself.
Sent 4: The Heston interview is at the very end of the movie.
Sent 5: After the Flint rally comes a brief TV interview with Heston, where he is asked about Kayla Rolland (again, clear evidence that the local media in Flint raised questions about the NRA's presence), then an inteview with country prosecutor Arthur Busch, entirely ignored by critics of the film, who also mentions Heston's presence as notable, and refers to the immediate reactions of "people from all over America", gun owners/groups who, according to him, reacted aggressively to warnings of having guns accessible to children, much like spanking advocates react aggressively when anti-spankers point to a case of a child being killed or severely injured by a beating.
Sent 6: These people do not feel the need to express sympathy, or to think about ways to avoid such incidents, but they feel the need to assert their "rights" and to look for quick, simple answers -- as Busch states, gun owners wanted to "hang [the child] from the highest tree".
Sent 7: This is all not mentioned by critics of Moore's movie, who claim to be objective.
Sent 8: Perhaps the best example of the paranoia surrounding Moore's film is your sub-essay "Is the end of the Heston interview itself faked?"Sent 9: Moore answers a simple question -- how could the scene have been filmed -- with a simple answer: two cameras.
Sent 10: From this, you construct an obscure conspiracy of "re-enactment": "For all we can tell, Moore could have shouted 'Hey!'Sent 11: to make Heston turn around and then remained silent as Heston left."Sent 12: Even if your "re-enactment" theory is true (and I see no evidence that you have actually tried to ask the people involved in the filmmaking for their opinion), this itself is not unethical, and you have no evidence whatsoever that Moore has done anything unethical here, just like you have no evidence that Moore has unethically removed parts of the interview.
Sent 13: You use standard filmmaking technique as a basis to construct bizarre conspiracies which sound plausible to the gullible reader, without ever providing any evidence for the implicit or explicit claims of fraud and distortion.
Question: What is not mentioned by critics of Moore's movie?.
Output: That people do not feel the need to express sympathy, or to think about ways to avoid such incidents, but they feel the need to assert their "rights".