As discussed on today's conference call, in an effort to satisfy the Presiding Judge's request to remove the protected status of materials, Mirant proposes the following action concerning exhibits it filed Nov. 6 pursuant to the protective order in the EL00-95 proceeding (namely, MIR-3 and MIR-4) : Mirant proposes to formally withdraw its submission of the protected versions of Exhibits MIR-3 and MIR-4, leaving the redacted versions of these exhibits as the only versions of MIR-3 and MIR-4 in the record. As noted on the conference call today, Mirant believes that the limited amount of material redacted from these exhibits (certain PPAs pursuant to which Mirant incurred emissions costs) is not relevant to the issues in this proceeding. If any party objects to or has concerns about Mirant undertaking such action, please let me know no later than November 28, 2001 at noon, EST. Thanks much,
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: Mirant Protected Materials
Lynn, I was ask to make a selection between Amy and Christine to do testing for the new accounting project. Which will take up to 50% of their time away from the team. My recommendation to you and Rick Dietz was Christine McEvoy to be the selected individual to test on this project. If you have any concerns on this matter please let me know. Thank you. One more thing, could we mention this in the next team leader meeting for all the individuals involved in this testing. Terry Kowalke
Answer: TW Accounting Testing Project
Here is an email: On October 2, I, Aaron Klem and our outside attorney, Jeanne Bennett, met with other ESPs, the utilities, and the Energy Division staff of the CPUC to hammer out an agreement on implementing the CPUC's order suspending direct access (DA) and handling continued submission of DASRs. It was news to the utilities that ESPs have many contracts -- most several years old -- that allow for addition and subtraction of facilities throughout the contract term. The utilities had thought that cutting off DASRs would be the best way to enforce the CPUC's order without having to review contracts (which they don't want to do). After much discussion and debate, the participants agreed to make a joint filing at the CPUC seeking quick action.
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: ESP/UDC/CPUC Meeting on Implementation of DA Suspension
Q: Here is my rendition of our To-do Lists: Rusk County Provide 1) Short circuit mVa, 2) allowable voltage dip, 3) substation design and 1-line diagram 4) schedule for power line, 5) schedule for substation 6) transformer sizing, efficiency/loss, etc. General Electric Will provide an all encompassing package from the low side of the transformer to the output shaft of the electric motors. Motors will be delivered to Hanover's shop for packaging and all other components will be communicated and delivered to the OGS East Texas location for Hanover to install. GE will provide system load study, engineering and design, equipment pricing, and a 10-yr Service & Maintenance contract that accommodates all parts, labor, engineering, etc. for all the equipment they provided into the project. These quotes will be provided to ECS and Hanover. GE needs the system and design details from Rusk Co. to formalize the package design and pricing GE will act as a sub for Hanover who will roll-up the total package of services to ECS. GE will provide a Draft Service & Maintenance Agreement to HCC and ECS. Hanover Compression HCC will package the skids and provide all the equipment & materials on this skids as well as the on-site installation. HCC will provide ECS with a detail description of the installation, services and pricing for the project. HCC will provide a Maintenance Quote for the compression equipment and materials that HCC provided into the project. (Jim, we probably need a detail description of this so that we can demonstrate how this service compliments the OGS resources rather than appearing to be a replacement perception). HCC will provide ECS with a project schedule that will become part of the agreement package. HCC will provide or perform any torsional studies, equipment testing and start-up resources for the project. (Jim, lets discuss to establish an overall schedule that incorporates GE, HCC and Rusk Co.) My big picture look tells me that Rusk Co. will need to begin ordering & sizing transformers next month to ensure a Firm in-service date of like 10/01/02. I want to target a 9/01/02 available for service date and an expectation to have electrical service ready and available for Testing and Torsional Analysis work. HCC will provide a set of Draft Contracts for the project (Operating Lease & Service and Maintenance Agreements) As you guys know, I need everything yesterday. Obviously all the pricing is critical as well as the Contract language because the agreements with OGS will need to be specific and represent the services that each of you are providing. Our schedule is critical not just for a successful 2nd Quarter close but also to accomplish an 8/02 date for testing and a 9/02 available for service date. I am establishing a FIRM In-Service date of 10/01/02 where all the commodity arrangements will take effect. I'm expecting that Dave Owen and Jimo will be running point with HCC and GE for all the technical and scheduling coordination. I also need to have the Draft Contracts early next week if not before. Thanks mk
Propose a subject line
A: OGS - East Texas Project
IN: Hi John, Thanks again for your help on the 3 way bookout with Williams. In the East , we would like to do some with Constellation. Your help in getting Rob Benson to allow us to do this would be helpful. MS sell to Enron Enron sells to Constellation Constellation sell to Enron 50 mw Cal 03 PJM 36.50 25 mw Cal 02 Nepool 42.50 Also, Enron sells to MS MS sells to Constellation Constellation sells to Enron 25 Cal 02 Nepool ICAP 1.05 kwm Thanks,

Generate a subject line.

OUT: More Bookouts
IN: This is an email
Sorry I didn't respond very promptly to your last email. Things have been very emotionally draining for me around here. I'm going to forward some of my recent email communications to catch you up on the issue. After you've had a chance to take in the situation I would really love to hear your opinion. Call or email with any insights. Susan Susan M Scott

What is the subject?

OUT:
News from the front lines....