IN: Attached is a redlined copy of the revised schedules to the Purchase and Sale Agreements. Also attached, for the sake of completeness, are the supplements to the schedules. The supplements are the same as prior versions, except for some changes to the title defects schedules for the Maverick, Box Draw, and Caballo systems. I attempted to redline the schedules for the title defects, but it redlined the whole list. The only change of substance added was a new Wyoming DOT road crossing permit to Maverick. Also taken off were references to the documents that have been prepared and sent to Gillette (that information was contained in brackets and began "[See Attached ....]. That information was for the right of way agents in Gillette so that they knew what documents had been prepared for them. Please let me know if you have any questions.

Generate a subject line.

OUT: Revised 20/20 Schedules
IN: This is an email
Michael - I have attached below a revised version of the Channel Marketing Agreement with Deloitte. This document is the most current form of agreement that needs to be used for these deals and also reflects my comments. These comments are based upon the comments submitted by Deloitte. I have incorporated those that we discussed and made some additional comments. You will note that in the "Fee Payment" section, I have included the present value concept that you requested. I have not, however, defined this concept, but would assert that it should be defined in the agreement. Accordingly, please let me know how you want to define it. As I indicated above, this is a bit of a different form than the one you submitted to Deloitte for review. So that we can ensure that accurate documents are distributed, please allow us to prepare the drafts for distribution to potential channel marketing partners. Like the preparation of NDA's, this will enable the Legal Dept. to keep track of the agreement and ensure the right version is used. Please let me know if you should need anything further. Mark

What is the subject?

OUT: Deloitte Agreement
QUESTION: Deb, Can you check the VP list for Bill. He was promoted to VP of Enron North America Corp. in January and, looking at the corporate database, his name is not showing up on the list. Thanks!
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: VP List
LLoyd Will and Kim Melodick have requested your help in identifying what YOU feel it takes to be successful within each functional unit of East Power. This feedback will be used to create a recruiting, retention and development tool that will assist East Power in identifying the skills and training that are key to your group's success. Please take some time to answer the attached four questions as they relate to your area. Your participation and cooperation is greatly appreciated. Sarah Zarkowsky x53791 Ben Brasseaux x58747 Meliza Evanson x57855 Enron North America Human Resources
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: What does it take?
Dear Greg, As we discussed, I am attaching our proposed form of ISDA Schedule and Credit Support Annex for your review. If you have any comments or questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 713/853-3399. We look forward to hearing from you. cc: Tom May Ed Sacks, Credit Bob Bruce, Senior Counsel
Answer: Draft ISDA-Ontario Power Generation, Inc.
Q: As a result of Jeff Nogid's request, here is a recap of the Morgan Stanley situation: (1) Morgan Stanley Capital Group Inc. This is the entity for commodity trading. (i) ECT has a Master Energy Price Swap Agreement dated 6/16/92 (ii) ECTRIC has an ISDA dated 3/2/99, but eff. 8/27/97 (2) Morgan Stanley Capital Services Inc. Jeff Nogid requesting new master for fixed income transactions (3) Morgan Stanley International Limited This is the entity for equity trading. Will Nogid or Kinneman ever need this one? Each of these companies has a different lawyer to negotiate the agreement. Each Morgan Stanley entity might require a separate guaranty. Anne Clark in legal (Cap Services) will let me know. I will put (2) in place. Do you want to pursue upgrading (1)(i) or addressing (3)? Please let me know. Thanks. Sara
Propose a subject line
A:
Various "Morgan Stanley" master agreements