Question:
Based on the premise "but didn't they pass that thing that we were gonna have a lottery or not", can we conclude that "Are we actually going to have a lottery?"? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
yes

Question: Sentence A: Ferries also go to Terre-de-Bas, leaving from Pointe Pitre, St-Francois, Trois-Riviyres, and Basse-Terre.

Sentence B: Ferries leave from Pointe Pitre, St-Francois, Trois-Riviyres and Basse-Terre.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Question: These objectives are to contribute to FHWA's corporate management strategies, which are based on the Malcolm Baldridge and the Presidential Quality Award criteria.
The Malcolm Baldridge criteria are implemented by a lost of corporates.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Problem: Here is a premise:
An example of the fusion of religions prevalent in Nepal, the inner temple to this Bodhisattva is encircled by Buddhist prayer wheels, while Hindu images are mounted on pedestals.

Here is a hypothesis:
The Hindu images that are mounted on pedestals are amazingly life-like.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Sentence 1: it's just a shame you keep going there and like week after week and every week you come away a loser i mean you after a while guys get tired and we just didn't go anymore so

Sentence 2: We stopped going because we were losing every week.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: yes

Premise:
"well it's it's a bidding war between teams and it's also popularity contest between sports to see who can get the biggest uh paycheck"
Hypothesis: Teams are not allowed to compete against each other in buying players.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
no