In this task, you are given a part of an article. Your task is to generate headline (title) for this text. Preferred headlines are under fifteen words.
--------
Question: Determining semantic textual similarity is a core research subject in natural language processing. Since vector-based models for sentence representation often use shallow information, capturing accurate semantics is difficult. By contrast, logical semantic representations capture deeper levels of sentence semantics, but their symbolic nature does not offer graded notions of textual similarity. We propose a method for determining semantic textual similarity by combining shallow features with features extracted from natural deduction proofs of bidirectional entailment relations between sentence pairs. For the natural deduction proofs, we use ccg2lambda, a higherorder automatic inference system, which converts Combinatory Categorial Grammar (CCG) derivation trees into semantic representations and conducts natural deduction proofs. Experiments show that our system was able to outperform other logicbased systems and that features derived from the proofs are effective for learning textual similarity.

Answer: Determining Semantic Textual Similarity using Natural Deduction Proofs

Question: 1 Ranks, processes and flat grammar ....................................................................................... 2 2 The Rank-Interpretation Architecture for Multilinear Grammars ......................................... 6 2.1 Outline of the Rank-Interpretation Architecture framework .............................................. 6 2.2 A preliminary note on linearity and hierarchy at the phrasal rank ..................................... 7 2.3 Characterisation of the Rank-Interpretation Architecture .................................................. 9 2.3.1 Background ..................................................................................................................... 9 2.3.2 Formal summary ........................................................................................................... 10 2.3.3 Contrast with traditional views of language architecture .............................................. 11 2.3.4 Search for sui generis properties of ranks ..................................................................... 11 2.4 Procedural perspectives on the rank hierarchy ................................................................. 12 3 The discourse rank .............................................................................................................. 15 3.1 The primacy of discourse patterning ................................................................................ 15 3.2 Intonation of an adjacency pair ........................................................................................ 16 3.3 Chanted 'call' intonation .................................................................................................. 18 4 The utterance or text rank ................................................................................................... 20 5 The phrase rank ................................................................................................................... 22 5.1 Characteristics of phrasal structure .................................................................................. 22 5.2 Linear sequences, iteration: regular and subregular grammars ........................................ 23 5.3 A note on long-distance and cross-serial dependencies ................................................... 26 5.4 Prosodic-phonetic interpretation at the phrasal rank ........................................................ 27 6 The word rank ..................................................................................................................... 30 6.1 Flat words ......................................................................................................................... 30 6.2 Flat derivations ................................................................................................................. 30 6.3 Flat compounds ................................................................................................................ 31 6.4 Prosodic-phonetic interpretation at the word rank ........................................................... 31 7 Summary and conclusion .................................................................................................... 33 7.1 From Duality to Multilinear Grammar and Rank Interpretation Architecture ................. 33 7.2 Generalisation to stochastic flat linear models ................................................................. 34 7.3 Future work ...................................................................................................................... 35 8 References ........................................................................................................................... 36

Answer: Multilinear Grammar: Ranks and Interpretations

Question: In this work, a computational intelligence (CI) technique named flexible neural tree (FNT) was developed to predict die filling performance of pharmaceutical granules and to identify significant die filling process variables. FNT resembles feedforward neural network, which creates a tree-like structure by using genetic programming. To improve accuracy, FNT parameters were optimized by using differential evolution algorithm. The performance of the FNT-based CI model was evaluated and compared with other CI techniques: multilayer perceptron, Gaussian process regression, and reduced error pruning tree. The accuracy of the CI model was evaluated experimentally using die filling as a case study. The die filling experiments were performed using a model shoe system and three different grades of microcrystalline cellulose (MCC) powders (MCC PH 101, MCC PH 102, and MCC DG). The feed powders were roll-compacted and milled into granules. The granules were then sieved into samples of various size classes. The mass of granules deposited into the die at different shoe speeds was measured. From these experiments, a dataset consisting true density, mean diameter (d50), granule size, and shoe speed as the inputs and the deposited mass as the output was generated. Cross-validation (CV) methods such as 10FCV and 5x2FCV were applied to develop and to validate the predictive models. It was found that the FNT based CI model (in the cases of both CV methods) performed much better than other CI models. Additionally, it was observed that process variables such as the granule size and the shoe speed had a higher impact on Corresponding author Neural Comput & Applic (2016) DOI:10.1007/s00521-016-2545-8 1 ar X iv :1 70 9. 04 31 8v 1 [ cs .N E ] 1 6 M ay 2 01 7 the predictability than that of the powder property such as d50. Furthermore, validation of model prediction with experimental data showed that the die filling behavior of coarse granules could be better predicted than that of fine granules.

Answer:
Predictive Modeling of Die Filling of the Pharmaceutical Granules Using the Flexible Neural Tree