Here is an email: I will be working in the London office Monday through Thursday, January 15 - 18 and will be be flying back to Houston on Friday, January 19. My assistant, Patti Thompson (x39106), has a contact numbers for me in London. I will be checking voice mail and e:mail regularly while I am there. Key contacts in Houston next week will be: DPR and MPR Shona Wilson x39123 Gas Operations Jeff Gossett x37306 (in Chicago office Jan. 16 & 17) Bob Hall x36956 Power Operations Stacey White x31870 Leslie Reeves x37962
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: In London Office - January 15-19
Q: ** Proprietary ** Kevin: You wound me. I was the person that called you by error, I was trying to call Michelle and dialed your number by mistake. So by the time I was saying who I was you had already hung up, ouch! Sorry for the boo boo. Hey how's is everything going? Sometimes I hate bid week, it's too busy I don't have enough time to check in with people. Did Michelle tell you we picked up some more transport from her on TW and may no longer be looking for more. How's the Sun Devil project going anyway? I haven't heard any word lately. Hope all is well with you, take care,
Propose a subject line
A: wrong number
IN: Meeting covered Market Power and Market Monitoring issues. First presenter was David Patton, from Potomac Economics. This firm has been jointly hired to provide technical support to SPP, MISO and Alliance. Many initial questions on what is market power, how can you define a well functioning market, etc. David envisions a market monitoring organization. If a problem emerges, it has to work with the RTO. IMM should not recommend power mitigation measures, but it should report any problems to FERC. It (has to go via FERC). General feeling is that Market Monitoring should be much more than market power, but to make sure that the market as a whole is functioning. It seems to me that the proposal is aligned with what Christi has advocated as part of the Southeast Mitigation. Multiple questions on how power market should be handled for must run, out of merit (constrained on and contrained off plants) and inflexible plants (e.g. hydro or take or pay gas contracts). Proposals to establish price caps were not accepted. Instead a proposal to deal with one or more generators with potential mkt power: they should have caps on bid prices. David proposed some market rules to deal with specific circumstances. It was generally accepted that demand side response should be used to mitigate market power. Other questions on how demand side bidding shold be operationalized (Mike: are there rules for DSB as part of the MISO Market Rules compendium?) Second Presenter - from WPPI. He raised serious concerns about potential market power in the region (Michigan Peninsula). Should utilities have approval to sell at market based rates? How should ATC be calculate to take into account counterflows? Issue is more pertinent until RTO enter into day 2 phase. Presenter's proposal, which faced a lot of resistance, was to assume that all Gs have market power, unless they prove otherwise (except must run agreements for reliability purposes). Roberto disagreed: this goes beyond MISO's authority. RTO has to work with IMM if market power is suspected. Dynegy requested David to further explore the situation of must run plants. David asked whether or not we had filed our position on MM for MISO. Mike: you may want to send him a copy, just as a courtesy. LM

Generate a subject line.

OUT: MISO Meeting last week
IN: This is an email
John: Here is a summary of the 2 Snyder Agreements. As we discussed last week, there is one trade (a basis swap that will expire in August 2004) that they want to remain under the 1194 Master. Let me know what you want to do. !. 1994 Agreement cross default threshold - $10,000,000 for Snyder and $25,000,000 for us automatic termination if bankruptcy occurs setoff includes affiliates collateral is LC's only collateral threshold - credit rating matrix Below BB- - 0 BB- $2,500,000 BB $5,000,000 BB+ $6,000,000 BBB- to BBB+ $10,000,000 A- and above $15,000,000 $15,000,000 Enron Guaranty 2. 1996 ISDA Agreement cross default threshold - $50,000,00 for us and $25,000,000 for them no automatic termination upon bankruptcy setoff includes affiliates collateral includes LC's and cash collateral threshold - $10,000,000 for both parties MAC trigger is below BBB- for us and BB- or below for them no Enron Guaranty Carol

What is the subject?

OUT: Snyder
QUESTION: Hi Jeff, Hope you are doing well. Got your email from Scott. I'm hoping you can do me a favor. We are doing a research project for a client and are trying to identify key technical management at a variety of companies, including Enron. Specifically, we are looking for names and addresses of the following: CIO/CTO VP, Directors and/or Sr. Managers responsible for the company's network. They'll typically have titles like VP of Network Operations and Senior Network Architect. Any chance you can get me this info for Enron? I'd be forever in your debt. thanks,
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: Favor
IN: Past meeting minutes were inadvertently left out of the board packets. The attached board meeting and executive committee meeting minutes are for your review. Thank you. Marilou A. Schopper Senior Vice President Center for Houston's Future

Generate a subject line.

OUT:
The Center -- board package addition