Question:
Based on the premise "well presumably those who find out such information if they are doing it i would prefer to not to be known and i mean you know the classic oh i don't know CIA conspiracy theories or whatever would have uh such parties trying to do it without your knowledge so there's things that invade that second type of privacy where you do know about them and possibly things that invade that second type of privacy without you knowing about it and i can't talk about the second one other than to to to generate paranoia yeah to surmise and i'd like to think that's it's quite low at least in this country i don't feel like the KGB is monitoring my phone or anything like that", can we conclude that "We talked about conspiracy theories but I honesty don't think anyone is monitoring my calls."?
****
Answer:
yes

Question:
Based on the premise "and we got here and we just couldn't believe how warm it was i mean it was in the fifties and we were taking off our winter coats and we were all dressed like Eskimos and uh and then soon after we had this big ice storm uh where everything was just covered with like an inch of ice and everybody uh and it was obvious that nobody knew how to drive in this weather", can we conclude that "It's pretty clear that these people are experienced driving in this weather. "?
****
Answer:
no

Question:
Based on the premise "I learned, for example, how a diadem, brooch, or bracelet could be invisibly hinged so as to be completely flexible in all directions, not a rigid little beast of unyielding metal and stone, but supple, tender toward the body, changeable in mood.", can we conclude that "A brooch can be made with an invisible hinge."?
****
Answer:
yes