Categorize the comment on the basis of severe toxicity. If the comment is severely toxic output Yes, otherwise output No.

[EX Q]: Holy crap, could this paper be anymore liberal? How about reporting unbiased news.
[EX A]: Yes

[EX Q]: Many years ago, I contacted a Kenai Judge who was not recommended for retention by the Alaska Judicial Council. The reason he stated that he was not recommended for retention was his moves to clean up the corruption in the Alaska Judicial System & this had offended too many lawyers & judges. He also said that I was the only one whom had taken the time to call him to discuss the matter. He was not retained...
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: It may be, time will tell, that we will regret the governor's action (implementing Medicaid). But we have a Superior Court opinion it was within his authority to do that. It may also be, if the Feds stop their subsidy (as expected, around 2018), we will find it was something of a trap and not easy to pay for (then). But it is absolutely a waste of money (big money truth to tell) to pursue an appeal almost certain to fail. It would be wiser for the majority to build bridges and create an atmosphere in which joint negotiations are the norm. It will be impossible to resolve our fiscal crisis any other way.
[EX A]:
No