Question: Sentence A: For example, what does Bush mean by equal opportunity?

Sentence B: Bush has never mentioned the idea of equal opportunity.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question: Moreover, there must be a system to identify homeland security funds across the wide range of existing budget accounts and program activities.
The system in place doesn't do an adequate job of identifying the funds when it comes to the existing accounts.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Problem: Here is a premise:
He wouldn't be so interested if it was anything else."

Here is a hypothesis:
He really wasn't interested in anything.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Sentence 1: i i haven't made any i've been just a recipient

Sentence 2: I have never received them.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: no

Question:
Lewinsky, Week 2: Newsweek 's cover story is The Secret Sex Wars; Time's is Independent Counsel Kenneth Starr.

Does it follow that "Time's piece on Starr is better than Newsweek's piece on Lewinsky."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
it is not possible to tell

Question:
Based on the premise "Pont du Gard", can we conclude that "Pont du Gard is a work of art."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
yes