Question:
Based on the premise "Using BLS weights, can compute an estimate of the aggregate US population demand function for postage from the household sector as the weighted sum of sample household level-demand functions Can compute own-price and cross-price elasticities of aggregate household demand for postage using this aggregate demand function.", can we conclude that "The demand for postage can be calculated by using BLS weights."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
yes

Question: Sentence A: it comes off in strips i mean not even little bit so we still have some of that trim work to do because we put it off all this time we know what a job it's gonna be because you almost have to strip the whole thing in order do it again

Sentence B: We have to finish the trim because only half of it is painted.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question: NRCS states that the program was authorized at $1.
Nrcs says the program was authorized for $1.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Problem: Here is a premise:
When the evidence is more consistent than not, the analyst confirms the pattern and looks for others related to it.

Here is a hypothesis:
When the evidence is consistent, the analyst still cannot confirm the pattern.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Sentence 1: Yes, lad.

Sentence 2: No, you're completely wrong on that.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: no

Premise:
"To the east of Negril is the Great Morass, a wetland area covering around 2,400 hectares (5,900 acres)."
Hypothesis: The Great Morass is a wetland located east of Negril.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
yes