In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Q: Comment: The question I have for BLM is: why aren't you hijacking and staging a sit-in at Toronto's Caribbean Festival Parade in August to highlight your message and agenda? It would seem like you would have a far more receptive and understanding audience there.
But no. BLM is blatantly using Pride because it is a bigger, broader, more popular and better-attended event. BLM absolutely does not care at all about the gay community; if so, they would be highlighting the homophobia and anti-gay violence in Caribbean and African counties, where gays have absolutely no rights at all.
The police absolutely must be allowed to march in next year's Pride parade. And BLM, by having violated the rules on parade participation on Sunday, must be banned.

A: Non-obscene
****
Q: Comment: So where is the hate crime leg when you really need it. "Freedom of speech" my ass! Charge this Troglodyte!

A: Obscene
****
Q: Comment: You are right Globe.

Lets simply have lynch mobs go around and anyone who is accused of sexual assault, especially if they are white male, be given a fast trial with a preconceived outcome., that is what you and your "Partners" are advocating for. Instead of due process, and paramount "Innocent Until Proven Guilty Beyond A Reasonable Doubt".

What poor, slanted journalism. Just too bad that little think called the Constitution would stop you from achieving your final dream.
You have lost the right to call yourself a major and unbiased paper, and should be ashamed.

A:
Non-obscene
****