In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: insult and non-insult. Insult is any lanugage or act that is disrespectful or scornfully abusive.
One example is below.
Q: Comment: your posts shows you are stupid period
A: Insult
Rationale: This comment is insult because it is scornful and disrespectful.
Q: Comment: Competence isn't black and white. A doctor may be extraordinarily competent in family practice, but not so as a surgeon. The question to be asked is, can this person be brought up to speed in those areas where his competence is lacking? The testimony before the tribunal was that yes, he could be brought up to speed. The tribunal rejected that testimony, preferring their own much harsher assessment of Camp's competence. Having said that, Camp's competence regarding sexual assault law is now a moot point anyway. Since the trial in question, he was elevated to a different branch of the judiciary where he will never deal with that area of law. However he will never serve in that position if the tribunal has its way.
A:
Non-insult