Given a paragraph about cooking, and a set of conversational questions and answers about the paragraph, say whether the passage contains sufficient information to answer the follow-up question. Say Yes if it is answerable; otherwise, say No. The paragraph has the prefix 'CONTEXT:'. Each conversation question has a prefix 'Q:' followed by the answer prefix 'A:', and the follow-up question has a prefix 'FOLLOWUP_Q:'.

CONTEXT: Without forensics it's hard to tell exactly what happened.However, one possible explanation is sunlight. If the watermelon was in the sun at all, even just a little part of it, that tends to accelerate the growth of all sorts of things.Another possibility is that it was just past its date. There isn't really a way to tell if this is near or not without chemical analysis.In watermelon country (I live near an ancient greek watermelon port) watermelon is generally refrigerated. This is partially because we find it tastier when it's cold, and partially because room temperature easily goes above 30, and even above 34-5 on certain days. <sep> Q: Cause of watermelon rind rotting? A: one possible explanation is sunlight Q: I left it on the kitchen table but it was out of the light. Any other reasons? A: Another possibility is that it was just past its date Q: What about the temperature of the room? A: room temperature easily goes above 30, and even above 34-5 on certain days Q: Is it edible if the white pith is rotted? A: There isn't really a way to tell if this is near or not without chemical analysis <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Is there a way to tell if it is ripe?
No