QUESTION: Premise: "A woman in a running outfit and a man with a camera stand in a crowd."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "The woman was in a running outfit." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

SOLUTION: Let's solve this gradually. A woman in a running outfit is a paraphrase of woman was in a running outfit.
Answer is yes.

QUESTION: Premise: "An opposite side street-shot of applebee's and dave and buster's restaurants."
Hypothesis: "There are two restaurants in this picture."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

SOLUTION: Let's solve this gradually. Applebee's and Dave and Buster's restaurants are two restaurants in this picture.
Answer is yes.

QUESTION: Given the sentence "An asian guy working a loom." can we conclude that "He is making a present."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

SOLUTION: Let's solve this gradually. You can work a loom and not be making a present.
Answer is it is not possible to tell.

QUESTION: Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "Three people are sitting on a couch and one is playing with some balls."
Hypothesis: "An orgy in session on a couch."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell

SOLUTION:
Let's solve this gradually. Three people are sitting on a couch and one is playing with some balls does not indicate that an orgy in session on a couch.
Answer is it is not possible to tell.