In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: Attention Oregonians: Senator Ron Wyden, a UofO law school grad, failed the Oregon bar exam three times, and has never been able to practice before the bar. So when he pontificates (or would that be rabbinicalates?) that Trump Jr. talked to the Russian lawyer soliciting buyers for information she evidently did not have, he was NOT colluding with anyone about anything. A shill in a skirt did a fan dance with some legal papers, conned her way to an interview, was listened to until it was determined that she was barking up the wrong tree about the wrong stuff, and was politely excused.

Now, was there dirt on Hillary Clinton? Who would know? Would dirt be useful in a political campaign? You betcha! Would the DNC solicit dirt on any Republican candidate? Damned straight they would!! Is that all "politics as usual?" yep. The American Way. Happens daily. The DNC is dredging for damaging information on any sitting Republican today, yesterday, and will be tomorrow.

Output: Non-sexual-explicit

Input: Consider Input: Comment: Here we go again.

The problem with Milo is exactly the same as the problem with Thomas Sowell, which is likely to become the problem with Camille Paglia: In the authoritarian world of identity politics, your politics are owned by your group identity.

Milo is Libertarian and openly homosexual (as is Camille Paglia). His real sin is his honesty. Make no mistake, statutory rape is rape regardless of consent by the victim, because the victim simply is not old enough to consent. Milo had his first (homo)sexual encounter when he was 13 or 14 with a Catholic priest . Thirteen or fourteen is too young to have sex -- homosexual or otherwise -- but they're doing it anyway. Milo's politically unforgivable transgression was to explain that he was a willing participant and to describe the personal importance of the experience.

His account made me uncomfortable because it forced me to confront realities outside of my personal experience. That's one of the things good journalism does,

Output: Sexual-explicit

Input: Consider Input: Comment: Look another republican living in the past. The present must be really rough. To be clear the report says that Trump paid prostitutes to pee on the bed Obama slept it to ruin it, not that he was peed on. He's much more of a garden variety peeping tom, opening doors he shouldn't and trying to catch women and teenagers unsuspectingly and undressed, if that doesn't work he can always grab em by the pussy.
Output: Sexual-explicit