As you know, current firm contracts on Transwestern provide for delivery of 250 MMcf/d of gas to Topock. In the context of the Gallup Expansion, Transwestern has entered into firm contracts for an additional 40 MMcf/d to Topock. Once the Gallup expansion is built, Transwestern will have a total of 290 MMcf/d of firm capacity under contract to the Topock delivery point: 40 MMcf/d more than PG&E has agreed to accept while PCBs continue to be present. Bill Cordes has asked what Transwestern's potential liability to shippers would be if PG&E's refusal to accept deliveries due to the continued presence of contaminants causes Transwestern to have to curtail firm service at PG&E/Topock. The legal answer is that Transwestern's tariff provides for a reservation charge refund but does not limit the damages that could be sought by a shipper. More specifically, Rate Schedule FTS-1 specifically provides for a reservation charge refund if Transwestern fails to deliver gas for a firm shipper. In December, January, February, July and August, the shipper is entitled to a reservation charge refund for all nominated and confirmed quantities not delivered. In all other months, the shipper is entitled to a refund only if deliveries fall below 75% of nominated/confirmed quantities for a period of 75 consecutive days. The tariff does not preclude a shipper from seeking other damages resulting from Transwestern's failure to provide service under an FTS-1 contract. A shipper whose firm service is curtailed would likely incur damages in addition to the reservation charge, including, for example, the cost of buying spot gas or damages resulting from the shipper's inability to fulfill contractual obligations. Such damages could be recovered in a breach of contract action. Not all shippers would incur such damages because some might be willing to take delivery of gas at alternate points if capacity is available at such points. Bill has asked Steve to work with me in quantifying our potential exposure. I could really use your help in putting a dollar amount on potential damages. Can we meet briefly to discuss this? I'm available after the Gallup meeting tomorrow a.m., or after lunch on Friday...or we can discuss a meeting time for next week. Thank you.
Answer: Confidential: PG&E/Topock issue
I am glad you asked me to lunch today. I do enjoy spending time with you even though at times it is tough and our conversations are hard right now. I do Love You so much and have a Vision.
Answer: PetroChem
Barbara, here is the document I discussed concerning some of the Chicago stuff. Jeff, I don't know if you have received this from Gregg all ready. Kay
Answer: enovate update
Clement, Attached is a form of Enron Guaranty which has been marked up by the counterparty. The guaranty would back to LLC which are owned by ENA to develop power plants. The guaranty backs a Precedent Agreement and a long term firm transport agreement. Please review the comments and let me know what you think.
Answer:
Enron Guaranty