Given the task definition and input, reply with output. In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Comment: My experience is that a vocal minority of militant First Nations have no interest in reconciliation - they are aided by an industry of law firms and professional protesters who's business models depend on perpetual conflict. There are also strong, independent First Nations who are empowered in their own right without the insulting patronizing from the growing industry perpetually offended career activists. Dissolve the Indian act, amend the constitution, and let's move forward together as a united country - if a vocal minority of activists want conflict, let them have it - the status quo has failed conclusively, especially in northern reserves that rely exclusively on government support - it's depressing.
Non-obscene