In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Ex Input:
Comment: Max Sword blatant nepotism is disturbing and I'm happy that all this attention and scrutiny is curbing Hawaii's back scratching culture of bribery and corruption...at least in this case. Sword's wife WORKED for Chapman. Conflict of interest much.

Ex Output:
Non-sexual-explicit

Ex Input:
Comment: Oh yes, Arliss Sturgulewski. Born Jane Wright, but I guess no one would remember that name as opposed to Arliss Sturgulewski. Anyway, I digress. Joe Vogler's halfway respectable showing in 1986 had much to do with Sturgulewski making it clear that she wanted nothing to do with anyone who supported any of her primary opponents. Here in Fairbanks, the few supporters she had in 1990 were the same little coffee klatsch of liberal Republicans who would meet regularly to plot against the rest of the party. Incidentally, one of that group wound up in Parnell's cabinet, but I likewise digress. That same group later brought us the equally-as-disastrous choice of Jim Campbell.

Ex Output:
Non-sexual-explicit

Ex Input:
Comment: Luckily Trump will shut this idiot up once and for all.
Lord knows Junior can't.
Platitudes, climate change rhetoric along with a few epithets won't take out your enemy.
Maybe Junior could carbon tax kim juck muck to oblivion like he is doing to us.

Saturday Night Live needs an MC - kim juck muck would do fine

Ex Output:
Non-sexual-explicit