In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

Comment: White domestic terrorists. Just sayin'..
Identity-attack

Comment: Yes, let's end the insanity! No more trans people! No more boys kissing boys! No more rock n roll music! Let's get back to the good ol' days of the 1950s!
Identity-attack

Comment: "To be fair" is a figure of speech. It's like saying "full disclosure". In this context I'm saying "here is the justification" knowing it is far from justified.
.
"all violence that occurred"
Using absolutes like "all" are dangerous and usually easy to refute. My understanding is that in most occasions the anti-trump protesters used their mouths to disrupt. Some were assaulted for doing just that. While I think they were in the wrong for interrupting the rallies, it is no justification to be assaulted.
.
"It seems to me that you seem awful eager to defend Trump these days"
Don't jump to conclusions, I believe Trump is right about one single thing in recent memory. I have agreed with a very small handful of his decisions. I still think the man is a short-sighted egocentric fool. Even a fool can get it right every once in a while.
Non-identity-attack