In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

[EX Q]: Comment: Right, a man who chooses to have sex with a women who has passed out is not responsible. As a matter of fact, it should be a man's right.
what kind of person are you?
Yes drinking to excess is not good for anyone. Sexual assault is a vicious crime.
Are you suggesting this woman asked to be assaulted? The cabbie assaulted her..she did nothing to deserve it.
Surely even you know the difference. If not, perhaps go to a rape crisis centre or buy a book...learning is quite powerful.
[EX A]: Sexual-explicit

[EX Q]: Comment: I know you despise bigots, ToTL, you have often spoken against them. I know you are a Christian.

All I said is that Trump didn't speak against the Bigots initially. Then he backed off yesterday. Today, he blames everyone as though the bigots are the same as those who despise bigotry. All I said, and I think it is true, is that as president, Hillary Clinton would have had no problem telling white nationalist bigots, the KKK, and the American NAZIs to stand down. Trump won't do it, Hillary would have done it.
[EX A]: Non-sexual-explicit

[EX Q]: Comment: Sue his ass amen! The PERMANENT fund dividend is based off a system that replenishes its self every year. If we don't have as good of a year then the PFD would be less. Based off a 5 year average. He wants to cut the money that we would be putting back into the economy to bail out the states fuck ups. How about the state pay for there own mistakes and stop with all the dump road projects like upgrading our high way to 6-8 lanes. We don't need that. Slow down take your time or drive a different rout. Or all the money there wasting on bridges to no where. Or there own salaries. Don't cut the PFD.
[EX A]:
Sexual-explicit