Premise:
"The palace, much altered over the generations, was generally used as a residence only at times of dynastic importance or danger, when Holyrood, down in the lowland, was difficult to defend."
Hypothesis: The palace was always the primary residence.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

no

input question: I left a note for Julius, in case he was Mr. Brown, saying I was 228 off to the Argentine, and I dropped Sir James's letter with the offer of the job by the desk so that he would see it was a genuine stunt. If this premise is true, does that tell us:"I dropped Sir James's letter with the job offer by the desk. "?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: yes

Question:
Based on the premise "He looked up at Jon with tears in his eyes.", can we conclude that "With tears in his eyes, he looked up at Jon."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
yes

Question: Sentence A: My mother was a Legal Aid attorney in Boston when I was growing up in the '50s, said Mr. Gray.

Sentence B: According to Gray, his mother was an attorney who worked in legal aid.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Question: Applying this definition means learning virtually everything about the instance being studied, including how it operates and what it does, in relation to the extrinsic or contextual events it is part of.
Applying that definition means you should learn virtually everything about what's being studied.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Problem: Here is a premise:
um-hum yeah well any of the guys that were ground yes yeah i can imagine

Here is a hypothesis:
I can imagine and predict what any of those guys on the ground will do.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer:
it is not possible to tell