The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.

Ex Input:
Context: 'that will be okay. then I take 2 water you take 1' 'i really need more food. are you sure that we cant do i get 2 foods and i can give you 2 firewoods and 2 water? what do you think?' 'Sorry I can not do with less food'
Utterance: 'okay we can stick to you having 2 and i get 1 correct?'

Ex Output:
No

Ex Input:
Context: 'I understand where you're coming from but I'm afraid that is not acceptable. My family's comfort is my top priority and I will be needing at least 2 firewoods to make sure they are kept warm. I would also request some extra water. ' 'I need a minimum of 2 firewood. You can have 2 water. I would now like 2 food.' 'It seems we both have a big need for firewood. 😮 If you insist on 2 firewood, then I insist on getting 2 water AND 2 food along with 1 firewood.'
Utterance: 'I insist on 2 firewood 🙂. I would be happy to let you have 2 water. Are you sure you need 2 food?'

Ex Output:
No

Ex Input:
Context: 'I'm sure we can come to some compromise. I know my sister and I want to make s'mores in the evening. How about I get 2 food and 1 firewood, 1 water and you get the rest? ' 'I love s'mores. Food is my number one concern though. If I'm only getting 1 of the food I really need all of the water. How does that sound?' 'So I get only 3 packages? 2 food and 1 firewood? '
Utterance: 'Do you need more firewood? I could compromise there.'

Ex Output:
No