Question: Sentence A: This meeting was originally scheduled for September 13 - 15, 2001, but was postponed in the aftermath of the September 11th attack on the U.S.

Sentence B: This meeting would talk about national security and the spendings towards homeland security.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question: Table 1 USPS Operational Costs by Major Function
Table 1 USPS Operations Profit by Major Function.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Problem: Here is a premise:
yes no that's you're right yeah

Here is a hypothesis:
No, nah, that's very wrong.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Sentence 1: Initially, as a conservative starting point, suppose the postal service is at breakeven with no discounts and no presort volume.

Sentence 2: Assume the postal service is at breakeven as a starting point.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: yes

Question:
It's a flippant comparison, to be sure, but it's one that illuminates the reasons why gambling has not been an economic panacea for other parts of the country, parts where the New Deal actually had an impact, for example.

Does it follow that "Some parts of the country benefited economically from gambling."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
it is not possible to tell

Question:
Based on the premise "Virtual-reality exhibitions go one step They attempt to create the you-are-there sensation without the objects.", can we conclude that "There are no virtual-reality exhibitions to experience. "? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
no