In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Example Input: Comment: Oh yes, Arliss Sturgulewski. Born Jane Wright, but I guess no one would remember that name as opposed to Arliss Sturgulewski. Anyway, I digress. Joe Vogler's halfway respectable showing in 1986 had much to do with Sturgulewski making it clear that she wanted nothing to do with anyone who supported any of her primary opponents. Here in Fairbanks, the few supporters she had in 1990 were the same little coffee klatsch of liberal Republicans who would meet regularly to plot against the rest of the party. Incidentally, one of that group wound up in Parnell's cabinet, but I likewise digress. That same group later brought us the equally-as-disastrous choice of Jim Campbell.
Example Output: Non-sexual-explicit

Example Input: Comment: It's unfortunate that you only interact with women with whom you pay to perform sex. The woman who resides in the White House is a whore (a profession with which you seem quite familiar). She received payment for marrying the offensive ogre that many consider our president. Now, that we understand your limited intellectual abilities, shut the fuck up!
Example Output: Sexual-explicit

Example Input: Comment: "Tail wagging dog"...that's not ALREADY our reality here?
Example Output:
Non-sexual-explicit