instruction:
The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.
question:
Context: 'In that case, I would be fine trading the extra food for a water. so you would get 2 waters and 2 foods ' 'Hmm, that works for me. So basically, you get 1 food, 1 water, and 2 firewood? I get 2, 2, and 0. If that's right, I agree.' 'Yea, so that about right, but i get 3 firewoods'
Utterance: 'Oh, yeah, sorry, mistyped that. Okay, let's do it then. Was good talking.'
answer:
No

question:
Context: 'Kindly understand our need as we are struggling with hunger now.' 'At the same from my side. We need foods because my child is hunger'
Utterance: 'We with our kids undergone fasting in the recent days, so we are hungry to the peak'
answer:
Yes

question:
Context: 'I would take 3 packages of food and just 1 package of water. Is it okay for you?' 'No, I don't take this. Because food is important for my child and me.' 'Try to understand our situation. We had food a week back. We were drinking only water for the whole week. We are dying of hunger. Kindly understand our situation.'
Utterance: 'Even me too facing the same, but i am ready to share one food with you. You can offer me more water to safe myself without dying. Both will be happy'
answer:
Yes