In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: Ya know, I gotta say, I don't find it much comfort to hear that "well, other denominations are losing adherents too." (As bad as the "well, other people abuse children too" with the implication that the hierarchy is somehow excused from the abuse and cover-up.) The overall drift away from Catholicism and other Christian denominations suggests a bigger overall problem. Christianity began and grew in the midst of a decadent secular Roman society, so frankly, it's not society's fault. I can't help thinking too many supposed Christian leaders have become too wrapped up in trying to dominate society with secular power rather than leading by spiritual example.

Output: Non-sexual-explicit

Input: Consider Input: Comment: What's gonna change on the repubs agenda. They've been doing nothing for 8 yrs, what's 4 more gonna matter.
Do nothing repub congress, all preachy and wanna get into women's vaginas & reproductive rights. While your base of ol white guys die off what's plan B for 2020.

Output: Sexual-explicit

Input: Consider Input: Comment: Union dominated thugs ..... lol. So how's that worse than the BC Liberal party being bought and paid for by the Corporate thugs at $10,000 a plate. How many NDP candidates of the 87 are Union leaders?? How many are even Union members? I bet you can't answer that and I bet further that your comment is baseless and it's probably just a bag of hot air.
Output: Non-sexual-explicit