IN: This is an email
I had a hard time logging on remotely, so I just got this now. As you can see, it's a relatively brief "overview" presentation for Jeff, not going into much of the detail surrounding, for example, performance criteria and evaluation or job classification (where much of the real work remains). The main purpose of this presentation is to give Jeff something for the December Board meeting. I need your thoughts on something: one of the rationales I had discussed with McKinsey for this new organizational approach was the need to win the war for talent. A partnership at least theoretically creates unlimited opportunity and reduced hierarchy in an organization. It also creates substantial upside opportunity and continued motivation for the business leadership. My question for you and your team is where are we at risk in fact when it comes to attracting and retaining talent. My suspicion is that our turnover is farily low, and that it is especially low in the top tiers of the organization. Where we run into problems, my gut tells me, is that we have some difficulty getting the very best from the very best schools (ie we often lose out to the I-Banks and, perhaps McKinsey-level consulting firms) and that we have a tough time holding the most talented managers and directors (ie we're OK at the top livels already). Could you have someone do an analysis of the turnover rates at different levels? We may need to weed out the performance related departures (including those who left after getting a low performance ranking even if they were not officially terminated for performance reasons) if possible.

What is the subject?

OUT: DRAFT - Document for next week

IN: This is an email
Hello...since I was working to reload some cycle 13 data for Northwest today, it seemed like a good a time as any to take care of these few foreign key violations as well. These 4 points are reported on the Northwest site, but do not appear in our PIPELINE_LOCATION table as of yet (hence the foreign key violation): 458 OWYHEE COMPRESSOR 611 NORTH DOUGLAS RECEIPT (2001) 608 NOVELTY HILL M/S 612 FOUNDATION CREEK PLANT (2001) If we can get these matched to their IHS DRN counterparts, that would be great. If not, we can make up the IHS number as we have in the past. Thanks,

What is the subject?

OUT: Northwest Foreign Key Problems

IN: This is an email
FYI. As part of the computer deal Enron bought me for home, I get these=20 ads. If there's anything you want (I think the prices are supposed to be= =20 good) let me know. If it looks like complete crap, please let me know that= ,=20 too.

What is the subject?

OUT:
PROVANTAGE - The Original Advantage #e11603