Detailed Instructions: In this task, you will be shown a prompt from a judicial decision and multiple holding statements derived from citations following text in a legal decision. Holdings represent the governing legal rule when the law is applied to a particular set of facts. There are five answer choices for each citing text. The correct answer is the holding statement that corresponds to the citing text. You should write an incorrect option. Even though there exist multiple wrong answers, we only need a single wrong answer. There is a <HOLDING> token in the position of the citing text prompt where the holding statement was extracted.
Problem:inmates and their attorneys. See id. 2. {12} Although inmates have a diminished expectation of privacy in prison, they are nonetheless protected by the provisions of the Abuse of Privacy Act. See generally Coyazo, 1997-NMCA-029, 8-16, 123 N.M. 200, 936 P.2d 882. Thus, to the extent that the district court below relied on Defendant's 8, 189 (Ct.App.1972) (stating that this Court will affirm if the district court is right for any reason, as long as the opposing party had an opportunity to respond). {14} In determining whether Defendant's telephone calls were recorded in violation of the Abuse of Privacy Act, the dispositive question in the present case is whether Defendant consented to the recording. See 30-12-l(E)(3); see also Coyazo, 1997-NMCA-029, 9, 123 N.M. 200, 936 P.2d 882 (<HOLDING>). In Coyazo, our Court recognized that an
Holding statements: (A) recognizing exception (B) recognizing a childabuse exception to marital communications privilege (C) recognizing that a partys prior consent to the recording or monitoring of communications constitutes an exception to the abuse of privacy act (D) recognizing the prior conviction exception of almendareztorres (E) recognizing such an exception
Solution:
recognizing exception