In this task, you need to write an incorrect answer to the given question. Along with the question, you are also given the correct answer(s) and the associated paragraph. An incorrect answer should be closely related to the content of the paragraph and/or the question but will not truthfully answer the question. Your incorrect answers should be similar to the given correct answer such that it will pose a challenge for students to distinguish the two. A good incorrect answer should prevent those who skip the paragraph from answering the question. The incorrect answer should not be trivial, in the sense that they should not be easily eliminated without reading the paragraph.
--------
Question: Paragraph- Sent 1: Late on the next Sunday afternoon Gifford had gone for a country walk which he had arranged to bring him round in time for the evening service at the little village church of Wynford standing just outside the park boundary.
Sent 2: His way took him by well-remembered field-paths which, although towards the end of his walk darkness had set in, he had no difficulty in tracing.
Sent 3: The last field he crossed brought him to a by-road joining the highway which ran through Wynford, the junction being about a quarter of a mile from the church.
Sent 4: As he neared the stile which admitted to the road he saw, on the other side of the hedge and showing just above it, the head of a man.
Sent 5: At the sound of his footsteps the man quickly turned, and, as for a moment the fitful moonlight caught his face, Gifford was sure he recognized Gervase Henshaw.
Sent 6: But he took no notice and kept on his way to the stile, which he crossed and gained the road.
Sent 7: As he did so he glanced back.
Sent 8: A horse and trap was waiting there with Henshaw in it.
Sent 9: He was now bending down, probably with the object of concealing his identity, and had moved on a few paces farther down the road.
Question: Who was trying to conceal his identity?.

Answer: Wynford.

Question: Paragraph- Sent 1: "What goes up must come down."Sent 2: You have probably heard that statement before.
Sent 3: At one time this statement was true, but no longer.
Sent 4: Since the 1960s, we have sent many spacecraft into space.
Sent 5: Some are still traveling away from Earth.
Sent 6: So it is possible to overcome gravity.
Sent 7: Do you need a giant rocket to overcome gravity?
Sent 8: No, you actually overcome gravity every day.
Sent 9: Think about when you climb a set of stairs.
Sent 10: When you do, you are overcoming gravity.
Sent 11: What if you jump on a trampoline?
Sent 12: You are overcoming gravity for a few seconds.
Sent 13: Everyone can overcome gravity.
Sent 14: You just need to apply a force larger than gravity.
Sent 15: Think about that the next time you jump into the air.
Sent 16: You are overcoming gravity for a brief second.
Sent 17: Enjoy it while it lasts.
Sent 18: Eventually, gravity will win the battle.
Question: How can humans overcome gravity?.

Answer: It is impossible.

Question: Paragraph- Sent 1: Iwasaki's careful respect for the Long Beach program and its lawyers earned him the political capital he needed to complete his takeover in a matter of weeks.
Sent 2: "The Long Beach program had strong support in the community so in a situation like that, one has to recognize that it's not like a takeover where I have all the answers and I know best," Iwasaki said.
Sent 3: "The people in the community who are working there have the contacts and the knowledge that will allow service to continue."Sent 4: Things have gone less smoothly across town.
Sent 5: There, Dudovitz, a longtime poverty lawyer and executive director of the San Fernando Valley's 36-year-old legal aid program, continues to struggle with his hostile takeover of the neighboring San Gabriel-Pomona Valleys service area one year after it was accomplished.
Sent 6: On the bright side, Dudovitz has extended his respected program to clients in the San Gabriel-Pomona Valley, and he now operates on a much larger budget, $6.5 million last year.
Sent 7: However, his clash with the old San Gabriel program resulted in litigation, bitter feelings and a mission that some say is not clearly focused on serving poor people.
Sent 8: "It was a difficult situation that was probably mishandled by everyone," a longtime observer of the public interest community said of the San Fernando Valley-San Gabriel-Pomona Valley merger.
Sent 9: "There are very few people who come out as the heroes.
Sent 10: Personalities got involved when they shouldn't have.
Sent 11: Things were said that caused bad feelings and couldn't be unsaid."Sent 12: Iwasaki's merger with the smaller, 48-year-old Long Beach program was friendly and fast, and no one - not even Long Beach board members - lost a job.
Sent 13: When it was over, Iwasaki had $1 million more in federal dollars and two new offices.
Sent 14: Long Beach clients regained services they had lost years ago when federal budget cuts and dwindling grants reduced the staff of 15 lawyers to five and cut immigration and consumer law programs.
Sent 15: Iwasaki said, "[I judged the transition] better than I could have hoped for.".
Question: In the eyes of the public interest community, was Dudovitz's hostile takeover well-handled?.

Answer:
Handled Well.