In this task, you're given a review from Amazon. Your task is to generate a rating for the product on a scale of 1-5 based on the review. The rating means 1: extremely poor, 2: poor, 3: neutral, 4: good, 5: extremely good.
One example: These are junk! Both bulbs have burned out within a two month period!! I cannot believe that this company can be in business with such poor quality. I have used infrared lights for my ball python for many years now and I get a varied range of months from a bulb, but I have never gone through two bulbs in a matter of two months! I am very disappointed.
Solution is here: 1
Explanation: The user seems very disappointed in the product. Because the bulb they ordered has been burned out earlier than usual. So, he gave 1 star to the review considering it extremely poor

Now, solve this: The brushed motor version of this frame is great. For some reason on the new brushless version, they got rid of the battery holder, and came up with this terrible rubber band idea. The frame arrived all warped to begin with. I heated it up with a heat gun and set a book on top to make it flat again. It worked, but as soon as you put a rubber band on, it will warp the frame again. Also, the little hooks that hold the rubber bands are worthless and pop off mid flight anyway. I ended up putting the rubber bands completely over the top of the canopy instead. It is better, but still not good. The only reason this got two stars instead of one is because the 3 blade props seem to perform better than the 4 blade props that came on my BetaFPV 65 pro.
Solution:
2