Question:
Based on the premise "The grimy paper, of a pattern now indistinguishable, hung in loose festoons from the wall.", can we conclude that "The loose paper was about to be taken down from the wall."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
it is not possible to tell

Question: Sentence A: But many also say the conceit of the episode--that a film crew is documenting life in an emergency room--was a cheap ploy to cover up gaffes.

Sentence B: Cameras were not allowed in the hospital to film the documentary.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question: These parameters were used to calibrate WTP for the visibility changes resulting from the Clear Skies Act.
These parameters were the only parameters that were used to calibrate WTP for visibility changes.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Problem: Here is a premise:
The most obvious remains at the site date from this time.

Here is a hypothesis:
The obvious remain at the site.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Sentence 1: The sacramental feel of Ofanim is both apt and ironic, for both composers came to fame for bringing down temples.

Sentence 2: The composer was a religious person.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Premise:
"Surveillance and air power are vastly more sophisticated than in previous wars, NATO has a far greater power monopoly in Europe than Hitler had, and in Kosovo, unlike in Vietnam, the isolated party in the war was not the United States but its enemy."
Hypothesis: NATO invests billions of dollars in fighter-jets every year.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
it is not possible to tell