Categorize the comment on the basis of obscenity. If the comment is obscene output Yes, otherwise output No.

[EX Q]: So your equating free speech to the money someone can donate (bribe) to a certain politician or political party? What about one person, one vote? Why should a Congressman take a constituents phone call based on how much money they have donated? That's not democracy. And to justify your arguement that President Kennedy was a member of the NRA. overlooks the fact that in the 60's, the NRA wasn't a political entity. Just a gun safety organization. Complete fail, Paul. Again. Please try harder.
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: Many Eugene businesses quietly produce product, pay their employees, and contribute to the local community. We never hear about them. The RG ignores them. What is it that the software companies want? Is it just their egos that they want to inflate with coverage? Would be nice to learn how much the heavily hyped software companies contribute as a percentage of the total local economic activity. I suspect it is very small. The new Avago semiconductor plant expected in the near future will likely by itself dwarf the contributions of the software industry, but we hear so little about them.
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: I am unsure of where you are going with this, for all the years you camp out on this post you have shown to be a 150% supporter of all things ultra conservative. You once posted to me that the state of Alaska was in such great fiscal shape and it was all due to the fact that most governors were elected GOP and that we have a GOP led majority in the state legislator. Well, those posts to me were a long time ago, are you not happy that your conservative led Alaska government did not save the day?
[EX A]:
No