Kriendler and Willy - Would you guys be willing to have your installations done for the Remote Energy Management Pilot done next week. You would be 2 out of the 10 first test homes. I would be coming by with the installers and possibly some media people. You can get the royal treatment. If so, I need to get some information: 1) What is your address. 2) What is your home phone number? 3) What is your office phone? 4) Do you have dial-up internet connection or broadband? 5) If you have broadband, is it cable or DSL? 6) If you have broadband, who is your provider? Regards,
Answer: Test Homes for Technology Pilot
Here is an email: Barry, The information on the top 10 from your contract list 1. Duferco-Farrell Corp. - Could not find any contract in our database. Do we have the name correct? 2. XTO Energy Inc. - There is no MAC clause in the contract. So they can't terminate unless we fail to perform. One way termination payment 3. Power Authority State of New York - No Master Found. Only a GTC and Master Interruptible. 4. The Peoples Gas Light and Coke Company - Found an old Columbia Energy Marketing and Consolidated Natural Gas Company. No MAC termination clause and no termination payment calculation. If party fails to perform then other party can seek damages. 5. NUI Utilities, Inc. - MAC Clause triggered at BBB-. Two way termination payment 6. Louis Dreyfus Natural Gas - No Master found. Just GTCs and a Master Spot 7. Florida Power and Light Company - MAC Clause triggered at BBB-. FPL can terminate unless we provide LC equal to their Termination Payment. One way termination payment. 8. The American Coal Company - Couldn't find any contracts. 9. Trigen Energy Corporation (Found Trigen-Nassau Energy Corp.) - No MAC Clause. No specific remedy for default (i.e. termination payment) 10. PrimeSouth, Inc. - Could not find any contracts Sorry for the delay. Let me know if you need more information.
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: Contract Review
Q: The International Coated Mechanical Paper Statistics - Flash Report and the International Uncoated Mechanical Paper Statistics - Flash Report for September 2001 are now available on Economics Online at www.pppc.org/econ/ , in the section Flash Reports. Should you have any questions concerning the content of this report, please do not hesitate to contact Paul Leclair Analyst - Finance and Markets at (514) 861-8834 or by e-mail pleclair@pppc.org. For questions or comments concerning Economics Online, please contact:
Propose a subject line
A: Intl Coated Mechanical Paper Statistics and Intl Uncoated Mechanical Flash Report September 2001
IN: Here is the current draft of the Paribas Master Netting Agreement. We intend to execute this this morning. The entities and agreements may change prior to execution. Contact me with any questions.

Generate a subject line.

OUT: BNP Paribas Master Netting Agreement
IN: This is an email
Here's what I have so far (who are we supposed to tell about this??) (i) Broker Margins Approx: $50mm Availability: End of Week Probability: 85% Current position (initial margin) $60mm out. John Arnold will tomorrow bring a large portion of this back by moving positions to our Paribas credit line (we have a $75mm line which we are only using $15mm of). I am working on the rest, which is spread across various other EGM books. (ii) Peoples JV Approx: $135mm Availability: Within month Probability: 50% We have (i) $10mm in the enovate bank account ($20mm in total, 50:50 Enron Peoples), (ii) $40mm storage inventory and (iii) $75mm in a pre-pay. (iii) Emmissions Reductions Credits (held by West Power). Approx: $25.5mm Availability: Dependent on whether financing Probability: 50% If the vehicle is rolled, then we could look to use the additional capacity. The vehicle will be rolled next week. (iv) Mariner - Zero ($2mm in bank) Deffner's group working on EGM's $400mm and Joe Gold is ready to go with his $300mm. So that's good, we should be able to get some of this off.

What is the subject?

OUT: Cash
The meeting yesterday with about 7 small producers in Okla went fairly well. It is obvious that they now realize that the cost of processing, if necessary is there obligation, not Northerns. We heard the same rhetoric about the history, for the past 30 years it is has been a "wet" system and they entered into contracts without any processing obligations. Northern' can't change due to this and historical operation and "unwaive" the high c6+ based on the highest receipt levels. They (Dan?? ) was very insistent that if a problem occurred, all shippers should be pro rated and NNG's tariff should be enforced at the tailgate of the Bushton plant, not the point of receipt as the tariff currently states. They asked us to file to change, potentially incorporate a default processing agreement that had to be used in the event of high concentrations of C6+-- I think you get the drift of the discussions-- don't just cut my gas, cut everyone
Answer:
Producer meeting