Given the task definition, example input & output, solve the new input case.
In this task, you must classify if a given review is positive/negative, indicating your answer as P or N.
Example: plot : two teen couples go to a church party , drink and then drive .
they get into an accident .
one of the guys dies , but his girlfriend continues to see him in her life , and has nightmares .
what 's the deal ?
watch the movie and " sorta " find out . . .
critique : a mind - fuck movie for the teen generation that touches on a very cool idea , but presents it in a very bad package .
which is what makes this review an even harder one to write , since i generally applaud films which attempt to break the mold , mess with your head and such ( lost highway & memento ) , but there are good and bad ways of making all types of films , and these folks just did n't snag this one correctly
.
they seem to have taken this pretty neat concept , but executed it terribly .
so what are the problems with the movie ?
well , its main problem is that it 's simply too jumbled
.
it starts off " normal " but then downshifts into this " fantasy " world in which you , as an audience member ,
have no idea what 's going on
.
there are dreams , there are characters coming back from the dead , there are others who look like the dead , there are strange apparitions , there are disappearances , there are a looooot of chase scenes , there are tons of weird things that happen , and most of it is simply not explained .
now i personally do n't mind trying to unravel a film every now and then , but when all it does is give me the same clue over and over again , i get kind of fed up after a while , which is this film 's biggest problem .
it 's obviously got this big secret to hide , but it seems to want to hide it completely until its final five minutes .
and do they make things entertaining , thrilling or even engaging , in the meantime ?
not really .
the sad part is that the arrow and i both dig on flicks like this , so we actually figured most of it out by the half - way point , so all of the strangeness after that did start to make a little bit of sense , but it still did n't the make the film all that more entertaining .
i guess the bottom line with movies like this is that you should always make sure that the audience is " into it " even before they are given the secret password to enter your world of understanding .
i mean , showing melissa sagemiller running away from visions for about 20 minutes throughout the movie is just plain lazy ! !
okay , we get it .
. .
there are people chasing her and we do n't know who they are .
do we really need to see it over and over again ?
how about giving us different scenes offering further insight into all of the strangeness going down in the movie ?
apparently , the studio took this film away from its director and chopped it up themselves , and it shows .
there might 've been a pretty decent teen mind - fuck movie in here somewhere , but i guess " the suits " decided that turning it into a music video with little edge , would make more sense .
the actors are pretty good for the most part , although wes bentley just seemed to be playing the exact same character that he did in american beauty , only in a new neighborhood .
but my biggest kudos go out to sagemiller , who holds her own throughout the entire film , and actually has you feeling her character 's unraveling .
overall , the film does n't stick
because it does n't entertain , it 's confusing , it rarely excites and
it feels pretty redundant for most of its runtime , despite a pretty cool ending and explanation to all of the craziness that came before it .
oh ,
and by the way , this is not a horror or teen slasher flick . . .
it 's just packaged to look that way because someone is apparently assuming that the genre is still hot with the kids .
it also wrapped production two years ago and has been sitting on the shelves ever since .
whatever . .
. skip it !
where 's joblo coming from ?
a nightmare of elm street 3 ( 7/10 ) - blair witch 2 ( 7/10 ) - the crow ( 9/10 ) - the crow : salvation ( 4/10 )
- lost highway ( 10/10 ) - memento ( 10/10 ) - the others ( 9/10 ) - stir of echoes ( 8/10 )
Output: N
The phrases used in the review convey a negative sentiment (e.g. "presents it in a very bad package").

New input case for you: every once in a while you see a film that is so effective in delivering the goods that it is easy to forget , and forgive , its glaring imperfections .
such is the case with ?
good will hunting ?
, a subtle character study about a socially inept mathematics genius who struggles to find his path in life .
despite some serious character problems , this is still a very good film .
you probably know about the plot
so i ?
ll make it quick .
will hunting ( damon ) is a janitor at m .
i .
t .
, he ?
s really smarter than einstein
but nobody knows it .
he likes to go out with his friend chuckie ( affleck ) and their other working - class buddies and drink beer .
he ?
s good - looking , charismatic , and witty but has a terrible time with authority and stiff college folk .
after getting into a tiff with the law , a distinguished professor ( skarsg ?
rd )
discovers will ? s genius and offers him a chance to clean up his record and avoid jail time , at a price : he must attend weekly sessions with a therapist and work on various mathematical problems ( that have stumped the academic elite ) with the professor .
after outsmarting and scaring the hell out of a couple of different psychologists he meets his match when hooked up with a once - promising therapist named sean maguire ( williams ) who has his own problems .
in the meantime will meets a british medical school student ( driver ) and they begin to fall in love .
the story starts out well enough and is a pretty original basis for a film .
even though we ?
ve seen movies about misunderstood , erratic prodigies before ( ? shine ?
ring a bell ? )
, the script here creates a complex narrative that doesn ?
t just focus solely on one character .
alas though , this is not a perfect film , as much as you feel like it could ?
ve been while watching it .
the one real problem i had with it is the unrealistic nature of the main character .
is it possible for a lowly janitor to be this intelligent ?
of course .
is it possible for him to be estranged from any deep , human relationships ?
usually , yes .
but , is it possible for him to also be so handsome , funny , quick with the tongue , and city - street tough ? not very likely .
come on , usually these guys are total nerds who can ?
t even buy their own shirts , much less talk down a harvard student in a hip pub while picking up phone numbers from pretty med .
-school
girls .
will is just a little too perfect , and in order to accept the character your disbelief suspension needs to be in excellent working condition .
the heavy - handed , anti - war statement made by will at a government job interview late in the film is also boorish , overlong , pompous , and completely unnecessary .
all this sounds pretty bad , but the film somehow makes up for it in other ways .
damon ?
s acting overshadows the fact that the character is slightly unbelievable ,
his performance is truly extraordinary . which leads me to the really good part of the review .
the strength of this movie can be summed up in one single word : acting .
i can ?
t recall seeing a film recently that was so well - acted from top to bottom . from minnie driver ?
s frustrated lover to ben affleck ?
s laid - back best friend , and all the small roles in between ,
the performances are magnificent .
robin williams ?
skill is a given as a bereaved psychologist who could ?
ve had a legendary career but was knocked off the path somewhere down the line .
the real gem though is stellan skarsg ?
rd ?
s turn as professor lambeau , an award - winning mathematician who feels reduced in comparison to a younger , smarter will hunting .
the scenes between williams and skarsg ?
rd , as two old college pals who ?
ve been brought back together by this enigmatic kid , display
some of the best acting i ?
ve ever seen .
when i say delivering the goods , this is what i ?
m talking about .
watching these two work is what going to see movies is all about .
gus van sant ?
s ( to die for ,
drugstore cowboy ) cold
, urban direction is right on , as well as danny elfman ?
s sauntering musical score .
i highly recommend ?
good will hunting ? .
despite its faults , it is still an intriguing and fascinating film and you are not likely to see a better acted one this year .
Output:
P