Given a paragraph about movies and a set of conversational questions and answers about the paragraph, say whether the passage contains sufficient information to answer the follow-up question. Say Yes if it is answerable; otherwise, say No. The paragraph has the prefix 'CONTEXT:'. Each conversation question has a prefix 'Q:' followed by the answer prefix 'A:', and the follow-up question has a prefix 'FOLLOWUP_Q:'.

Q: CONTEXT: This is not really explicitly explained in the film (it's only briefly mentioned), but implicitly: Anton Ego is a famous critic known for scathing reviews and an extremely finicky taste. When Linguini holds a press conference, Ego arrives and announces in front of the reporters that he'll be reviewing Linguini's restaurant - so this review is highly publicized and anticipated. Then, surprisingly, not only is his review not scathing, but he also calls the restaurant's chef the finest chef in France. And soon after the review is published, it turns out that the kitchen was infested with rats. So it would appear that Ego clearly dropped the ball, and if the publication he works for is as finicky as him, it's not that far-fetched that he'll be fired over such a well-publicized blunder. [Also bear in mind that his experience with Remy was a real eye-opener and changed his beliefs. Since the film doesn't specify when Ego lost his job and reputation, it's possible he continued to write reviews that were significantly mellower (since he now also believed in Chef Gusteau's notion that 'anyone can cook'), and that his fanbase was disappointed and simply stopped reading them.] <sep> Q: What was the reason Anton Ego lost his job? A: he also calls the restaurant's chef the finest chef in France. And soon after the review is published, it turns out that the kitchen was infested with rats Q: I thought he didn't mention rats in his review? A: ot only is his review not scathing, but he also calls the restaurant's chef the finest chef in France Q: Why did Anton lose his reputation if he didn't mention anything about rats? A: it would appear that Ego clearly dropped the ball, and if the publication he works for is as finicky as him, it's not that far-fetched that he'll be fired over such a well-publicized blunder <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: What does Ratatouille mean?

A: No
****
Q: CONTEXT: Of course this changes from country to country, but generally speaking it's not illegal to film on the streets, since it's a public area. Most car scenes are recorded with chroma just for pratical reasons. In a professional production you look for "quality" and you can achieve it only if you have control. It's all about control. With a studio setting you get full control of the lights, the movements, etc. in one word, the scene. And of course, you minimize the hitches that can occurs in the real world (also safety concers). However you should film outdoor shots to enrich and give credibility to your scene. <sep> Q: Why are most scenes in a car recorded with chroma? A: Most car scenes are recorded with chroma just for pratical reasons Q: What reasons are those? A: In a professional production you look for "quality" and you can achieve it only if you have control. It's all about control Q: Is it illegal to film while driving in a public place? A: Of course this changes from country to country, but generally speaking it's not illegal to film on the streets, since it's a public area Q: Are there any safety concerns when filming? A: you minimize the hitches that can occurs in the real world (also safety concers <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Is there anything else you can tell me on this subject?

A: Yes
****
Q: CONTEXT: He starts walking as soon as he pushes her, and he's halfway up the stairs by the time bystanders notice she's under the train. He walks quickly but calmly, he doesn't run away. In unremarkable clothing, it isn't strange that no one stopped him. As for security systems, if you watch more of the series, you'll notice that Frank is always aware of when he is being recorded. I don't believe his action was spur of the moment. He chose to meet her there and do the deed because he had an way out where any recording of him wouldn't be enough to identify him, especially with the hat and glasses. Would that be possible in the real world? Could there actually be a blind spot all the way out of the station? Unclear. Her death was likely ruled an accident because metro police departments are overworked, and there isn't any immediate evidence to the contrary. The fact that they wouldn't find the angle and direction of her fall suspicious bother me too, I don't have an answer for that. <sep> Q: How could Frank escape the crime scene without any witnesses? A: He walks quickly but calmly, he doesn't run away. In unremarkable clothing, it isn't strange that no one stopped him Q: Was the subway station empty? A: bystanders <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: We're they in a 'blind spot'?

A:
Yes
****