Question:
Based on the premise "In his continuing trial, he should be able to address this question because adolescents will be randomized to booster sessions or a single session.", can we conclude that "It makes perfect sense to randomize things for young adults."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
it is not possible to tell

Question: Sentence A: The New Jersey State Bar Foundation receives 12.

Sentence B: The New Jersey Bar Foundation gets 25.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question: So the Bill Clinton paradox--his reckless pursuit of sex and his timid clinging to office--is indeed no paradox.
Bill Clinton recklessly pursuits sex while in office.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Problem: Here is a premise:
i i see a lot of things like uh scouting uh

Here is a hypothesis:
I don't see anything.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Sentence 1: Say, Miss Tuppence, do you think I'm ever going to find Jane? Julius spoke in a discouraged voice.

Sentence 2: Julius was full or courage when he asked if he'd ever find his socks again.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: no

Premise:
"uh-huh well that's good keeps them active i'm sure well it was good talking to you"
Hypothesis: I didn't like talking to you.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
no