Given a paragraph, generate a claim that is supported by the given paragraph. 1) The claim must contain information from within the paragraph. 2) A sentence within the paragraph can be used as a claim. 3) The claim should not have contradictions within the paragraph. 4) The claim should be at most one sentence long.

Example Input: The Hall of Fame rocker, who has been an advocate for teen cancer patients for nearly three decades, visited with children, young adults and their families at Rainbow Babies Hospital on Monday. The Who's front man toured the Angie Fowler Adolescent & Young Adult Cancer Institute, which was founded in 2012 to better serve young patients while they undergo cancer treatments and following their release. "Teenagers for so long have been overlooked," said the 73-year-old, still on the road with longtime bandmate Pete Townshend. "Not nearly enough has been done for them." For years, teenage cancer patients were hospitalized on pediatric floors or placed with older patients. After consulting with doctors researching treatments and recovery, Daltrey understood the need for teens to have a place of their own, where they could recover in surroundings more suited to their interests and maturity level. "The light went on in my head with this one," said Daltrey, who first got involved with the Teenage Cancer Trust in 1989. "I was in the Who when I was 18 years old and without the support of this age group adolescents and young adults our business wouldn't be there. The music business is built mostly with this age group. It's an easy way for me to say, 'Thank you.'" During his visit, Daltrey, whose iconic voice helped make Who songs such as "My Generation," Behind Blue Eyes" and "Won't Get Fooled Again" anthems for generations of fans, spent time with young cancer patients who have benefited from their time in facilities like the one at Rainbow Babies Hospital. Daltrey quickly connected with several of the teens, who eagerly shared stories of being diagnosed and lengthy hospital stays. He had a warm word, hug or handshake for each of them and was happy to pose for photos. For Adam Kirk, Daltrey's visit was a chance to meet a rock hero. The 40-year-old's daughter, Sawyer, has been fighting leukemia for months and Daltrey's face lit up when he saw the 1-year-old being carried toward him. Kirk came prepared for his meeting, getting Daltrey to sign a well-worn copy of "Who's Next," regarded as the band's signature album. As he made his way around an outdoor, rooftop garden, Daltrey was approached by another dad who wanted to show his appreciation for the singer's charitable work. Tyson Stiles presented Daltrey with a musical gift. While his son, Ryver, spent nearly 300 days in the hospital after being born prematurely, Stiles recorded a short album that included songs he wrote about his son's ordeal. "I wanted you to have a copy," Stiles said. "Is it any good?" Daltrey asked. "No, it's terrible," Stiles quipped as both men laughed. Later, Daltrey donated a guitar signed by him and Townshend that will be permanently displayed in the Fowler Institute's in-patient unit. Daltrey also shared memories of his previous visits to Cleveland. He and the Who first came to town in 1967. "It's a lot different than it used to be," he said. "It was the dirtiest place I'd ever been to in my life. Everything was covered in soot. But Cleveland audiences were some of the best we ever played for."
Example Output: The Who's Roger Daltrey visits teenage cancer patients.

Example Input: The story sidebar estimates that a full course of treatment can cost $3000 or more. It could have added that this treatment is unlikely to be covered by many insurance companies. This was the biggest hole inan otherwise reasonably solid story. The article claims that there is "growing evidence" that neurofeedback can help treat peoplewith ADHD. However, the story never describes any of the results of this purported increase in research that supposedly documents these benefits. The closest we come is the description of a study which hasn't even been published yet. The story also suggests that neurofeedback's benefits might last longer than those of medication. Again, however, we are never given any sound basis to believe that neurofeedback works at all let alone better than other treatments. At the same time, the story leans heavily on testimony from a journalist who has written a book about ADHD and claims neurofeedback worked for her and her son. We are told that the primary improvement she saw withher sonwas that he was "easier to live with."Although this kind of anecdotal reportcan be usefulto add context to scientific findings,it iscertainly no substitute for reporting on the actual clinical outcomesof research. The story failed to discussany potential harms of neurofeedback treatment. The most prominent of these isthat patientscould forego other treatment approaches that have better supporting evidence and are more likely to reduce symptoms. There is also some evidence thatneurofeedback can cause seizures or makesymptomsworse in some individuals with psychological disorders. In addition, the need for frequent treatments may necessitate taking a child out of school. Readers should come away from this story with a generallyaccurate feel for where the research on this treatment stands. The story told readers early on that neurofeedback is "scientifically uNPRoved" for the treatment of ADHD. It backs up this contention later in this story by noting that almost all research on this treatment hasn't involved aplacebo control group. And the onlystudy toinclude such a group apparently hasn't released its results yet and seems to have involved a very small number of patients. In addition,the story quotes an expert who emphasizes that other forms of treatment (e.g. medication and behavior therapy) have better evidence to support their effectiveness for ADHD. We did think the story focused a bit too much on a single patient anecdote (a deficiency discussed later under the "Benefits" criterion) an emphasis whichmakes the treatment sound very promising with little justification. The story could have struck a better balance by toning this section down a bit. No disease-mongering in this story. In addition to extensive comments from the journalist book author who discusses her experience with neurofeedback, the story quotes a Duke University researcher who is an expert on ADHD and offers some counterbalancing perspective. The story quotes a researcher who says that two other approaches medication and behavior therapy have a more extensive research base supporting their use for ADHD compared with neurofeedback. It's clear from the story that this type of treatment is available to the general public. We like that the story cautioned readers to look out forunqualified therapists andgave tipsfor finding reputable clinicians. The story could have been more specific about how many trained professionals there are and how easyit isto find them outside of large population centers. The story does not oversell the novelty of neurofeedback for the treatment of ADHD. This story does not appear to be based on a news release.
Example Output: Train The Brain: Using Neurofeedback To Treat ADHD

Example Input: The Office of the Chief Medical Examiner issued a news release Thursday saying that the two infants who lived in McDougald Terrace in Durham had tested negative for the gas. The release said that a determination about the causes of the infants' deaths are pending an autopsy but that it it was releasing the information about the negative tests because of public health concerns. The deaths of the two babies at McDougald Terrace in November and December have been at the center of concerns about conditions at the complex. The medical examiner's news release came a day after the authority's chief executive officer Anthony Scott said at a news conference that Durham officials inspected 70 occupied apartments at McDougald Terrace and identified furnaces, hot water heaters and stoves that were emitting carbon monoxide and needed to be replaced in 28 of those units. The housing authority evacuated about 200 households from the complex and into hotel rooms last week, and it may need to evacuate the remaining 160 units depending on additional results from Wednesday's inspections, Scott said. Carbon monoxide is a colorless, odorless and potentially poisonous gas that can cause illness and in cases of prolonged exposure, death, the Mayo Clinic explains. About a dozen other adults and children at the complex have been treated for exposure to carbon monoxide since mid-November, The News & Observer reported. McDougald Terrace was built in the 1950s and is Durham's largest public housing community, the newspaper said. It has failed multiple federal inspections, according to the Department of Housing and Urban Development. Scott said the low inspections scores show the housing authority's properties "are in bad shape." He added that decades of underfunding have contributed to the situation. The housing authority said it has reached out to local, state and federal partners for help in replacing the appliances, but does not yet have an estimate on how much the repairs will cost or how long they will take.
Example Output:
Tests: No carbon monoxide in baby deaths at housing complex.