Premise:
"The Counselas assertion that the phrase aexisting law- is limited to statutes and excludes the Constitution is unsupported."
Hypothesis: The Counselas asserted that Existing law is not limited to statues and it does include the Constitution.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

no

input question: They're not good or evil, they are just mindless slaves to instinct and the food chain. If this premise is true, does that tell us:"They are evil little things that are slaves to addiction. "?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: no

Question:
Based on the premise "yeah TI has a little uh owns a piece of land on the edge of a lake that borders that the lake is on the border of Texas and Oklahoma it's called Lake Texoma", can we conclude that "TI has some land called Lake Texoma."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
yes

Question: Sentence A: Some goods are produced more cheaply in the United States than abroad.

Sentence B: All goods produced in the US is more expensive than any other country.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question: yeah um you you lose four to six hundred dollars a trade in
I would advice you not to do a trade in.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Problem: Here is a premise:
2 million to a New York woman who was mistakenly kidnapped and transported to Alabama by bounty hunters.

Here is a hypothesis:
A NY woman was taken to Alabama by bounty hunters for a crime she had committed.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer:
no