In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

[Q]: Comment: And, finally:
.
"We'd be in uncharted territory, that is unarguable."
.
What nonsense.
.
The vast majority of democracies world-wide use PR. Are you really suggesting Canadians are too dumb to figure it out?
.
Or are you merely suggesting that it only works in countries where the populations once worshipped Odin, Thor, and Freya?
.
Bring on Bugs Bunny, Elmer Fudd, and the Wagnerian opera ...
[A]: Non-obscene

[Q]: Comment: If the author had any appreciation of multiculturalism, he would understand that people of different languages and culture have difficulties with names with different spelling constructs and pronunciations. The author thinks multiculturalism is for him to receive as a birthright for not having been born white, and that it is beneath his own dignity to extend multiculturalism tolerance to others of different races and cultural backgrounds. He makes a poor example of what a Canadian ought to be.
[A]: Non-obscene

[Q]: Comment: Cutting off your nose to spite your face is foolish. It was lost. Trudeau cut our losses and definitely saved us millions. Every legal mind in Canada agrees with our PM. Why would you want us to fight the rule of law and our own Charter. Trudeau cleaned up an embarrassing mess left behind by Harper.
[A]:
Non-obscene