In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

[Q]: Comment: Accuse another country of wmd's won't work. Damn social media and educated people. The bane of conservative rule
[A]: Obscene

[Q]: Comment: Your dystopian concept of a "free" society where hospitals dump the sick on the curb if they don't have insurance isn't the country I want to live in. Luckily neither do most Americans.
[A]: Non-obscene

[Q]: Comment: I do not know if this is possible (although I don't see why it wouldn't be) but I would hope that +Burke would be stripped of his status as a cardinal. One is not ordained as a cardinal, it is a position granted at the pleasure of the pope, and carries no other weight then (a) being an advisor to the pope and there are lots of those, and (b) election of a new pope and Burke is not needed for that as we have quite enough to do so, and will continue to have enough as +Francis appoints more each year he is in office. Ergo: +Burke is simply of no use and is not needed.
[A]:
Non-obscene