TASK DEFINITION: Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.
PROBLEM: This doctor sounds like a legit man with a "World View" attitude toward varying political climates. His use of opiates is actually quite sound, and opiates are the most relied on pain management method for thousands of years-simple fact. The other thing is plainly clear-the US govt has attacked the ability of Drs. and clinics to effectively treat pain, without fear of "doing the wrong thing" as one doctor specifically described it to me. If a guy gets a minor injury the doctors are scared to even hand out 3 low strength painkillers. I am not quite sure the motivation here because I think it would benefit the US govt far more for having the masses addicted as can be. Lining their own pockets thru medical service/product in the USA anyway....but the doc is still ON POINT with his approach-this STINKS of a witch hunt.

SOLUTION: No

PROBLEM: I am aware of the logic behind replacing signals with roundabouts; however, I was wondering if the logic is actually working at Dowling because the roundabouts seem to be too small for the traffic volume and speed, especially at rush hour. I'm also not aware of situations where roundabouts are designed to be plaed at the end of a freeway exit ramp.

My third paragraph comment has to do with the way Dowling St. traffic views the yield signs. Those motorists appear to barrel through the roundabout without yielding to exit ramp vehicles. I'm wondering if drivers assume that street traffic has the right of way over exiting freeway traffic. APD could raise a lot of money by enforcing rules at this intersection, particularly at rush hour.

SOLUTION: No

PROBLEM: Oh, for pete's sake. Mr. Dunleavy's insistence that the less kids know about all aspects of sex is ridiculous. The fact that he insists on throwing up barriers in an attempt to block thorough sexual education is quite annoying, if not suspect.

SOLUTION:
Yes