The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the vouch-fair strategy, otherwise output No. vouch-fair is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to call out fairness for personal benefit, either when acknowledging a fair deal or when the opponent offers a deal that benefits them. This can be through an explicit call out or can be implied.

[EX Q]: Context: 'How about water? do you need? I can offer 2 of these for 1 pack of food' 'I have plenty of water right now, but need at least 1 pack of food for myself.' 'OK. Do I get the water then? You can at least take a pack'
Utterance: 'Yes, that works for me. 🙂'
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: Context: 'Hey there, unfortunately, I'm in a bit of a quandary with firewood too, as I am going to a place where it's fairly cold and will need more for heat. ' 'thats terrible! i broke my leg and wont be able to collect my own firewood , could i maybe get 2 packages? ☹️' 'Terribly sorry to hear that; it sounds like you won't be able to camp much in that condition. I assume you have someone coming along to help you because of your leg?'
Utterance: 'just a bunch of children under 5 who wont be able to gather firewood. so i desperately need at least 2'
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: Context: 'bro pls givene me two water for me,' 'Are you sure you won't get hungry? I am open to giving you the two waters, but I want to make sure its the best deal for you. I would want 2 firewoods and 2 foods in exchange.' 'brother k , bro 2 water and 2 wire wood 1 firewood can you given?'
Utterance: 'I think that that is acceptable to me. I want to make sure we both understand: I get 1 Water, 2 Firewood, 2 Food Packages. You get 2 Waters, 1 Firewood, 1 Food Package. I will have to ration my water, but I think the extra comfort is worth it. Does this work for you? '
[EX A]:
Yes