In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence can be inferred from the statement. Incorrect choices change the meaning in important ways or have details that are not mentioned in the statement. Indicate your answer as 1,2, or 3 corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

Statement: However, a 60 day period was afforded for comments to be submitted on the interim rules, which period was reopened on August 7, 1995 and extended to August 18, 1995. Choices: 1. There was an additional 11 day period for comments on the rules. 2. There was no additional comment period after the initial 60 day one. 3. The interim rules were temporary rules for fence building.
1

Statement: Such information could be the size of the program or activity you are reviewing, for example. Choices: 1. Participant statistics can also be used as relevant information. 2. Activities not being reviewed are valid to include. 3. The size of the program is relevant information that may be used.
3

Statement: The company, which is now traded publicly, was started in 1980 by a psychologist named Stephen Gordon, who was restoring a Queen Anne-style house in Eureka, Calif., and found it maddeningly difficult to locate the period-style fixtures he needed. Choices: 1. Gordon wanted homes to look modern. 2. Gordon started the company when he wanted to make more homes look restored. 3. The company was started by Gordon.
3