Question:
Based on the premise "Starting in 2008 for sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides and in 2010 for mercury, the owner or operator of a facility that fails to hold allowances covering the annual emissions of its affected units is treated as having excess emissions.", can we conclude that "Starying in 2017 for mercury, the operator or owner of a facility that fails to hold allowances covering the annual emissions of its affected units is treated as having perfect emissions."?
****
Answer:
no

Question:
Based on the premise "So says my TV.", can we conclude that "So announces my TV."?
****
Answer:
yes

Question:
Based on the premise "In my opinion the whole thing is a mare's nest of Bauerstein's! ", can we conclude that "I am fairly certain Baurstein is to blame."?
****
Answer:
it is not possible to tell