IN: This is an email
John, I took the volumes on deal 226556 to 0 for the term of the deal starting June 1. This is the purchase from Belden & Blake behind NYSEG. I changed the volume on deal 226563 from 1 dth/day to 1500 dth/day. This is the purchase from StatOil at CPA. The price on this deal is NX1 + .434 and the price on John's worksheet is NX1 + .54 (per MCF). John, is this price adjusted for dth?? I created deal 280185, purchase from StatOil, volume of 333 day, the price is NX1+ $.56 PER MCF. This is a purchase of local production behind the citygate. David, this deal probably needs to be hedged in Sitara. Cindy - deal 226563 is a purchase from CES - Statoil Energy. I set up deal 280185 with the same counterparty. This deal should have been in the system effective 1/1/2000. According to Elizabeth, we should not use the CES - StatOil Energy. It doesn't matter to me how its set up, however, this deal should have been in the system from Jan and it is the same type of deal as deal 226563. I changed the volume on deal 226747 from 1 dth to 1100 dth/day. This is a purchase from Questar and it is also local production behind CPA. John, there are 3 deals for Questar, the other 2 deals have volumes of 0 right now. Can you tell me how the volume should be split out for pricing purposes? Molly, I created deal 280132, FOM priced sale to CES. This deal will be matched with the CPA local production deals. Let me know if anyone has any questions. Thanks

What is the subject?

OUT: Local Production for June
QUESTION: Attached please find referenced list. The only amended counterparty with a change was Murphy Exploration which was shut down for power. I wonder, when we are working with amended counterparties, if there is some way that my prior approval could be on the recent spread sheet? Right now I have to go find the old spread sheet to find out what I approved it for last time to see if I have any problem with the change. So usually, unless I have - change next to amended, it means I had no change to what I said before. Does that make sens?
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: Counterparty Approval List for 1/28/00
We remain in the process of gathering information sought by various governm= ental agencies. Please search your files and collect all records and documents covered by o= r relevant to the following requests: (1)=09All records relating to any investigations/review of the allegations = raised by Sherron Watkins in her August memo to Ken Lay, including but not = limited to: (A) =09=09The review conducted by V&E in relation to which you were intervi= ewed. (B)=09=09Any review conducted by AA. (C) =09Any relevant internal Enron review. (2)=09All records from investment bankers or other financial advisors, oth= er than AA, regarding the structuring, financing or accounting relating to= Enron's SPEs, subsidiaries, and/or partnerships including but not limited = to LJM1, LJM2, JEDI, CHEWCO, RAPTOR ENTITIES, OSPREY, BLUE DOG, and their s= ubsidiaries. In the context of the above requests, "records" includes, whether in electr= onic or hard copy form, all and any emails or regular mail/memoranda you ma= y have sent or received, notes you may have made, documents (including draf= ts) on shared/hard drives, meeting notes or minutes or actual opinions/advi= ce from any of the above sources. A full definition provided by the govern= ment is attached hereto. If you discover any records/documents, or if you have any questions, please= contact the RAP TEAM at responseteam@enron.com or ext. x5-3723. =20 We appreciate that you may have received what appear to be similar requests= in relation to other governmental lines of inquiry but it is very importan= t that we respond, and are seen to respond, to each governmental request as= specifically, fully and promptly as possible. Thank you in advance for your continuing assistance in this matter. Regards,
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: TEAM 4 - HR ENERGY & COMMERCE SUBPOENA (1) (01/14/02) AND (2) (12/10/01)
Hey gang: I think that we should do the case. I'm willing to help draft, and willing to take a first crack at putting some bullets together about the direction I think the memo ought to take and distribute that by about 5 PM tomorrow. Though it would be good for other folks to do same and then we could compare notes. Makes sense? Thoughts? Suggestions? Best,
Answer: DuPont
Here is an email: Just so you know, I spoke with the group this morning about contracting practices and they agreed to do the Christine/Susan/dealmaker huddle prior to sending any contracts out. It helps that I have Kevin's support on this. I think it will work fine. TK is going make sure Tenaska gets credited. The difference between actual and billed amounts is very little. Thanks for your attention to this last week.
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: Tenaska
QUESTION: Both Dan and Scott Brown are available to talk at 5pm. I told Scott you guys would call him. Dan can't talk for long since he has a 5:30 on 50.
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS:
This afternoon