In this task, you will be shown a sentence, and you should determine whether it is overruling or non-overruling. In law, an overruling sentence is a statement that nullifies a previous case decision as a precedent by a constitutionally valid statute or a decision by the same or higher ranking court which establishes a different rule on the point of law involved. Classify your answers into overruling or non-overruling
--------
Question: for all the foregoing reasons, friesen v. city of glendale, supra, 209 cal. 524, is overruled and lombardy v. peter kiewit sons' co., supra, 266 cal.app.2d 599, is disapproved to the extent that they are inconsistent with the views herein expressed.

Answer: overruling

Question: in affirming the defendant's convictions and sentence, the court of appeals generally disapproved trial court consideration of the lsi-r as "contrary to the essential function of the trial court in sentencing.

Answer: overruling

Question: and we therefore disapprove of wyche to the extent it holds to the contrary.

Answer:
overruling