Question: Sentence A: Former Long Beach Executive Director Toby Rothschild, now a policy wonk in Iwasaki's outfit, agreed.

Sentence B: Toby Rothschild found that being a policy wonk with Iwasaki was a more expensive option.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question: And, while this sounds like a cliche, it's undoubtedly Parcells makes his players believe they can win, so they do.
Parcells spends hours every day hyping his players up telling them they can win.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Problem: Here is a premise:
At one time it was a very miserable valley, a swampland conducive only to breeding malarial mosquitoes.

Here is a hypothesis:
This valley was once home to only mosquitoes.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Sentence 1: The training was structured to allow participants to subsequently train colleagues who did not attend the sessions.

Sentence 2: The training allowed participants to train colleagues who weren't at the sessions.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: yes

Question:
Fleece easily melts, even when exposed for less than a second to the flame of a cigarette lighter.

Does it follow that "The fleece will melt from a lighter flame."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
yes

Question:
Based on the premise "Lung Cancer Cardiopulmonary Mortality, and Long-term Exposure to Fine Particulate Air Pollution.", can we conclude that "Long term exposure to fine particulate air pollution and lung cancer cardiopulmonary mortality are not related."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
no