Question: Cairo (CNN) -- Civil rights lawyers demanded the death penalty for former Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak on Monday, joining prosecutor's calls for him to be executed.

"We merged our voice with the prosecutor's closing arguments from last week's hearing and demanded the death sentence to Mubarak, his former interior minister Habib El Adly, and four of his aides for killing hundreds of protesters and injuring thousands more," attorney Khalid Abu Bakr told CNN. "We have proof Mubarak is directly responsible for the killings along with El Adly and his aides."

Abu Bakr said Mubarak deserved to die for violating Egypt's criminal law 77.

"His negligence and actions led to endangering the national security of the country," he said.

The attorney also provided the court with a list of alleged suspects he wants indicted, including police officers he said where caught on camera firing their weapons on protesters.

Another lawyer, Sameh Ashour, said he provided evidence to the court "of communication between security forces that prove the presence of snipers on rooftop buildings during the revolution."

The judge, Ahmed Refaat, has set aside Monday and Tuesday to hear from at least 10 civil rights lawyers. The defense is expected to make its closing arguments later in the week.

"The judge will then decide on a day to announce the final verdict," said Adel Saeed, the official spokesman of the General Prosecutor's office. "If he is fast, we may see a verdict before January 25th" -- the day the Egyptian uprising began last year. 1. What were civil workers demanding?
2. For who?
3. What did prosecutors want?
4. What law did he violate?
5. What specific law was it?
6. What were the police officers doing on video?
7. What evidence did Ashour have?
8. and what else?
9. What was the judges name?
10. When did they expect to hear a verdict?
11. How many civil rights lawyers were there? Provide a numbered list of answers.
****
A numbered of answers: 1. The death penalty
2. Hosni Mubarak
3. For him to be executed.
4. Killing protesters
5. Egypt's criminal law 77.
6. Firing their weapons on protesters.
7. Ccommunication between security forces
8. Proof of the presence of snipers
9. Ahmed Refaat
10. Before January 25th
11. At least 10.

Q: Read a version of this story in Arabic.

Eddie Ray Routh was crying, shirtless, shoeless and smelling of alcohol when police caught up with him walking the streets of his hometown of Lancaster, Texas.

His family didn't understand what he -- a Marine veteran suffering from post-traumatic stress disorder -- was going through, he told the officer last September 2, according to a police report.

He had a simple message that was as much a plea as it was a complaint: I'm hurting.

That visit -- which came after Routh, angry that his father was going to sell his gun, left the house and threatened, his mother told police, to "blow his brains out" -- prompted him to be placed in protective custody and sent to Dallas' Green Oaks Hospital for a mental evaluation.

Six months later, the 25-year-old Routh is in custody once again -- this time in a central Texas jail, facing murder charges in the deaths of America's self-proclaimed most deadly military sniper ever as well as the sniper's friend.

He is on a suicide watch and under 24-hour camera surveillance, Erath County Sheriff Tommy Bryant said Monday.

Should vets with PTSD, mental illness still have access to guns?

And he's already run into further trouble, becoming aggressive with guards in his cell after refusing to give up a spork and dinner tray Sunday night, according to the sheriff.

So who is Eddie Ray Routh?

Bryant has said Routh was in the Marines for four years, though it is unclear how much of that time, if any, was in combat zones. Shay Isham, a lawyer appointed by a judge Monday morning to represent Routh, said his client spent roughly the last two years in and out in Veteran Affairs medical facilities for treatment of mental issues.

1. Eddie Ray Routh
2. 25
3. the Marines
4. yes
5. post-traumatic stress disorder
6. September 2
7. he was angry
8. sell his gun
9. yes
10. a hospital
11. Green Oaks Hospital
12. a mental evaluation
13. he went to jail
14. murder charges
15. four years
16. no
17. Shay Isham
18. no
19. the guards
20. unknown

Numbered questions:
1. Who was crying?
2. How old is he?
3. What is is a veteran of?
4. Is he suffering from anything?
5. From what?
6. What day did officers find him walking?
7. Why did he leave his home?
8. What was his dad going to do?
9. Was he suicidal?
10. Where was he put after the argument with his parents?
11. Which one?
12. What for?
13. What happened 6 months later?
14. What for?
15. How long was he in the Marines?
16. Is it known how many of those years were spent in combat areas?
17. Who is his laywer?
18. Is he being civil in jail?
19. Who is he violent towards in jail?
20. Who did he not want to give up?

input: The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) was adopted by the United Nations General Assembly at its 3rd session on 10December 1948 as Resolution 217 at the Palais de Chaillot in Paris, France. Of the then 58 members of the United Nations, 48 voted in favor, none against, eight abstained, and two didn't vote.

The Declaration consists of thirty articles affirming an individual's rights which, although not legally binding in themselves, have been elaborated in subsequent international treaties, economic transfers, regional human rights instruments, national constitutions, and other laws. The Declaration was the first step in the process of formulating the International Bill of Human Rights, which was completed in 1966, and came into force in 1976, after a sufficient number of countries had ratified them.

Some legal scholars have argued that because States have constantly invoked the Declaration over more than 50 years, it has become binding as a part of customary international law. However, in the United States, the Supreme Court in "Sosa v. Alvarez-Machain" (2004), concluded that the Declaration "does not of its own force impose obligations as a matter of international law." Courts of other countries have also concluded that the Declaration is not in itself part of domestic law. 1. What is UDHR?
2. when was it adopted?
3. and where?
4. Did it have 25 articles?
5. What was the first step ?
6. Why were legal scholars arguing?
7. what country invoked the declaration?
8. how many members of the UN were a part of this?
9. What happened in 2004?
10. Is the Declaraton part of domestic law? Return numbered answers in your output.

output:
1. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights
2. 10December 1948
3. Paris, France.
4. No
5. The Declaration
6. it has become binding as a part of customary international law.
7. United States
8. 48 voted in favor
9. "Sosa v. Alvarez-Machain"
10. No