Question: Sentence A: Dentists have to make patients want adult orthodontics in a way physicians don't have to make patients want a quadruple bypass.

Sentence B: Dentists have an easy time in convincing adults to get orthodontics.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question: In addition, organizations sought member input in developing new systems and mechanisms for communicating information, thereby better fulfilling member needs and giving the members a sense of ownership in the system or product.
Organizations wanted members to give input to eliminate some existing systems.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Problem: Here is a premise:
It's about time.

Here is a hypothesis:
It might be about time.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Sentence 1: Microsoft's position is a reflection of an economic phenomenon often referred to as network externalities (a k a positive economic feedback or increasing returns to scale).

Sentence 2: Microsoft will experience increasing returns to scale far into the future.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question:
um we usually go pitch a tent and we stay out there for the weekend or um for the week matter of fact i think we're going to go again in in May

Does it follow that "We usually just use a tent. "?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
it is not possible to tell

Question:
Based on the premise "Slim considered, "I guess not.", can we conclude that "Slim considered what Red had said, "I guess it isn't.""? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
it is not possible to tell