In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Q: Comment: I think you ought to review the data on primaries. Sanders has won total of 19 state contests...most of his wins were in states that do not have primaries. Instead, like Alaska, they have caucuses. In Alaska, less than 550 people participated in the Democratic caucuses. There are apartment complexes in Anchorage with more people than that. Where everyone actually gets a chance to vote in primaries Clinton has won overwhelmingly. That is why she has more than 3,000,000 more votes than Sanders. You are entitled too your own opinions, but not your own facts.

A: Non-sexual-explicit
****
Q: Comment: Hi, ignoramus, love to see you in an alley way and
beat you with a louieville slugger. This will come
to pas and whites will lose. Why, because they still
haven't even figured out which are men and which
are women. Terrible a race that can't even figure out
that born with a penis is male and a vagina is female.
Thank the Great one whites won't survive 50 more
years.

A: Sexual-explicit
****
Q: Comment: For the record, Michael, you just divided the world into Manichaean camps, which is what you accuse Trump of doing. The bane of Manichaean thinking is that the truth always gets lost somewhere in the middle. That truth, very simply, is that there are two major constituencies in America at the moment. Mr. Trump represents one of them. The question is not who's good and who's evil, but how we're going to come together to make room for our better angels.
The fallacy of Manichaean thinking is that the author always locates himself on the side of good.

A:
Non-sexual-explicit
****