Question:
Based on the premise "The Capitol Hill co-op did not get into trouble because its members were bad, inefficient baby sitters; its troubles did not reveal the fundamental flaws of Capitol Hill values or crony baby-sittingism.", can we conclude that "The Capitol Hill co-op avoided trouble because of its bad inefficient members like Stacy Adams and not the fundamental flaws of Capitol Hill values."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
it is not possible to tell

Question:
Based on the premise "it's eating me alive because i i might be almost fifty but i'm single and i don't think and this company's that just because and i own my own home and i have a garage and because i'm single there's companies that won't take me no matter how old you are", can we conclude that "i worry because I am single."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
yes

Question:
Based on the premise "The communes were strong enough to confine German Emperor Frederick Barbarossa's Italian ambitions to the south, where he secured Sicily for his Hohenstaufen heirs by marrying his son into the Norman royal family.", can we conclude that "Barbarossa's son fell in love with a woman from Italy."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
it is not possible to tell