Detailed Instructions: In this task, you will be shown a prompt from a judicial decision and multiple holding statements derived from citations following text in a legal decision. Holdings represent the governing legal rule when the law is applied to a particular set of facts. There are five answer choices for each citing text. The correct answer is the holding statement that corresponds to the citing text. You should write an incorrect option. Even though there exist multiple wrong answers, we only need a single wrong answer. There is a <HOLDING> token in the position of the citing text prompt where the holding statement was extracted.
Problem:that the allegations of sexual abuse or molestation and also being photographed by Bracigliano in a sexual manner are sufficient aggravating circumstances which, if accompanied by a permanent posttraumatic stress disorder, which is substantial, constitutes a "permanent loss of a bodily function" even without residual physical injury. Id. at 413, 696 A.2d 625; see also C.P. by J.P. v. Township of Piscataway Bd. of Educ., 293 N.J.Super. 421, 430-31, 681 A.2d 105 (App.Div.1996) (suggesting that a minor who had been subjected to an act of sexual contact by a swim instructor could cross the verbal threshold, provided plaintiff demonstrates a permanent psychological disability resulting from the molestation); A.C.R. by L.R. v. Vara, 264 N.J.Super. 565, 571-72, 625 A.2d 41 (Law Div.1992) (<HOLDING>). However, we agree with the Board that if
Holding statements: (A) holding that specific intent is not element of assault resulting in serious bodily injury (B) holding that loss of customers and resulting injury to goodwill can constitute irreparable harm that is not compensable by an award of money damages (C) holding that psychological conditions resulting from workrelated trauma are compensable (D) holding that sexual assault of a minor resulting in psychological harm may be compensable under the tca even in the absence of personal injury (E) holding that sexual assault coercion and harassment certainly may violate contemporary standards of decency and cause physical and psychological harm
Solution:
holding that specific intent is not element of assault resulting in serious bodily injury