Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.

Q: "cost would be minimal in the scheme of things" If you sell your car and you only get 2 per cent more than it is worth; (Worth $1,000 and you get $1,020) and you have to pay 2.5% tax on the sale that means you have to pay $1,025. So you now have to pay more than your profit was. Multiply that so the $1,000 is really $1 million dollars of a small construction project, and you might understand the effect of this tax. ($20,000 profit; $25,000 tax. Knife River will have to pay $5,000 more than you actually made.)

A: Yes
****
Q: Dividends have been less than a thousand in the past. And the market is down from 2014 (after which the Senate became G.O.P. dominated and the economic recovery began plateauing). Why would be "guarantee" a thousand? This, of course, is the G.O.P. again showing their inability to remember recent history (like the oil crash of the 1980s) and a lack of smarts.

A: No
****
Q: Hey.... You got us off topic. This was supposed to be about student loans and garnishing SS.

A:
Yes
****