Well, that didn't work. Neither Thursday nor Friday at 2:00 will work. I'll try one more time for this week. Please let me know by noon, Thursday if you can not make any of these times: 9:00 CST, Friday, 8/31 10:00 CST, Friday, 8/31 11:00 CST, Friday, 8/31 I will send a note by end of day, Thursday confirming the time and giving the dialing information. Thanks,
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: La Plata to Bloomfield Drag Reducing Agent Conference Call
Please update me on where things stand. We need to get this wrapped up before I go on maternity leave. i'm hopeful that you are close and amybe done to 1 or 2 counterparties. Thanks. Carol
Answer: CES
Here is an email: I received from the TNRCC an NOV letter for the above facility for failure to submit an emissions inventory for 2000. This notification from the agency originally came to Rick Loveless by way of Wayne Brunette. I called the TNRCC and spoke to Kevin Cauble concerning the NOV and he pulled the emissions inventory submitted in 1999 for the facility. Because VOC's are the issue, I asked him what the emissions were for VOC's on the 1999 inventory. Kevin stated that the inventory showed VOC emissions of 19.50 tons/yr actuals and 33.56 tons/yr potentials. We discussed why EOTT would submit an inventory as it is not a major source and not required to. The only thing we could come up with is that EOTT may have anticipated an increase in throughput at this site and therefore, wanted to ensure that this facility was shown as a title V source. According to the phone records from the TNRCC for this facility, Craig Willoughby of Entrix had requested that the faciltiy be kept on the list of facilities required to do inventories. I have a call into EOTT to determine whether increased throughput is proposed for this facility in the near future. In speaking with Kevin, he suggested that if a determination is made that if there is to be an increased throughput that wont exceed the 100 ton/yr limit on VOC's, or that throughput conditions remain approximately consistent with previous years, EOTT should provide written notification to the agency that this facility does not meet the applicability requirements of 101.10 (emissions inventory requirements) and request that this facility be removed from the TNRCC mailings. Should EOTT confirm the status of operating throughput to be below the 100 ton/yr VOC emissions limit, I will make make written notification to the TNRCC requesting removal from the list.
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: Potential NOV letter from TNRCC to EOTT for Ozona Crude Station
Q: Jeff, here is the intial draft. Please leave as a word document and make any changes and additions that you think necessary. I haven't even changed the wording after I first put it down. Mike
Propose a subject line
A: draft org memo
IN: I just received this so I wanted to pass it along. I'll work through the comments and get back to you with any questions. Kay

Generate a subject line.

OUT: Memo to Raber re ENRON Option.DOC
IN: This is an email
harlan: for forwarding to dynegy the framework re the sithe letter: 1.added cross default to master netting agreement. 2.added acceleration of ena's payment obligations in the event of default by enron parties under the master and close-out by the dynegy parties. 3.added set off right to dynegy parties if they end up owing under the master to the remaining payment obligations of ena. re the master netting agreement which you will send: 1. added cross default to ena's payment obligations under the sithe letter. 2. added set off right to dynegy parties like in 3. above.

What is the subject?

OUT:
dynegy letter re sithe