We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty) into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Example Input: Sent1: Did you study when these people were exonerated and in what year were they placed on the death penalty?
Sent2: The studies are very clear that people are routinely convicted of crimes that they never committed, period.
Example Output: Not similar

Example Input: Sent1: Well I think that if someone commits a crime worthy of the death penalty they should get a sentence for life that way they can't be a repeat offender.
Sent2: Most people deranged enough to commit crimes worthy of the death penalty feel no remorse for what they have done.
Example Output: Not similar

Example Input: Sent1: The reasons given most often for supporting the death penalty are emotional reasons of retribution for the heinous acts of the criminal.
Sent2: It is called the death penalty for a reason...it is a penalty, a punishment.
Example Output:
Not similar