You will be given a definition of a task first, then some input of the task.
In this task, you will be shown a prompt from a judicial decision and multiple holding statements derived from citations following text in a legal decision. Holdings represent the governing legal rule when the law is applied to a particular set of facts. There are five answer choices for each citing text. The correct answer is the holding statement that corresponds to the citing text. The four incorrect answers are other holding statements. You should find the correct option. There is a <HOLDING> token in the position of the citing text prompt where the holding statement was extracted.

was unable to meet its burden of showing that remedy under 1581(c) was manifestly inadequate. Id. at 964. Having found that the plaintiff-appellant could not establish standing under either 1581(c), nor 1581(i), the Miller court dismissed the Complaint. Id. Here, NuFarm is seeking to have its potential class members assert jurisdiction under 1581(i), while NuFarm itself has already established jurisdiction under 1581(a) for identical claims. See Plaintiffs Motion at 20 (stating "it appears that the great majority of the members of the class have jurisdiction for their claims under 28 U.S.C. 1581(i). . . .") Under Miller, the scope of 1581(i) jurisdiction is "strictly limited." Norcal/Crosetti Foods, Inc. v. United States, 963 F. 2d 356, 360 (Fed. Cir. 1992) (<HOLDING>). The Court of Appeals in Thomson examined a
Holding statements: (A) holding that the remedy under another subsection of 1581 is not manifestly inadequate because 1581s builtin safeguards and limitations are not to be dismissed because they are inconvenient (B) holding that decisions that lie within the trial courts discretion are to be sustained unless manifestly erroneous (C) holding that if the federal claims are dismissed before trial the state claims should be dismissed as well (D) holding that surveys are admissible only if they are conducted with proper safeguards to insure accuracy and reliability (E) holding that legislative regulations are given controlling weight unless they are arbitrary capricious or manifestly contrary to the statute
Output:
(A)