In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Ex Input:
Comment: I know you despise bigots, ToTL, you have often spoken against them. I know you are a Christian.

All I said is that Trump didn't speak against the Bigots initially. Then he backed off yesterday. Today, he blames everyone as though the bigots are the same as those who despise bigotry. All I said, and I think it is true, is that as president, Hillary Clinton would have had no problem telling white nationalist bigots, the KKK, and the American NAZIs to stand down. Trump won't do it, Hillary would have done it.

Ex Output:
Non-sexual-explicit

Ex Input:
Comment: Did I miss something in the article about her parents immigration status? Or is this an assumption based on the colour of her skin?

Perhaps her parents did immigrate to Canada, perhaps it was her grandparents, or maybe she came on her own. Does it matter?

People who made, and also those who went along with this assumption, simply based on what she looks like need to get with the times and STOP making assumptions on people based on the colour of their skin.

Ex Output:
Non-sexual-explicit

Ex Input:
Comment: I get a lot of amusement from supporters of the parvenu Republican Trump calling the old guard RINOs. What is the Freedom Caucus? William Buckley would have called them the lunatic fringe.

Ex Output:
Non-sexual-explicit