In this task, you are given text for US Congressional and California state bills, your task is to generate a summary for this bill.

Input: Consider Input: SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ''Make It In America Manufacturing
Communities Act''.

SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS.

In this Act:
(1) Manufacturing community support program.--The term
''Manufacturing Community Support Program'' means the program
established under section 3(a).
(2) Participating agency.--The term ''participating
agency'' means a Federal agency that elects to participate in
the Manufacturing Community Support Program.
(3) Participating program.--The term ''participating
program'' means a program identified by a participating agency
under section 3(c)(1)(C).
(4) Secretary.--The term ''Secretary'' means the Secretary
of Commerce.

SEC. 3. PROGRAM TO DESIGNATE AND SUPPORT MANUFACTURING COMMUNITIES.

(a) Program Authorized.--The Secretary shall establish a program to
improve the competitiveness of United States manufacturing--
(1) by designating consortiums as manufacturing communities
under subsection (b); and
(2) by supporting manufacturing communities, as so
designated, under subsection (c).
(b) Designation of Manufacturing Communities.--
(1) In general.--Except as provided in paragraph (7), for
purposes of the Manufacturing Community Support Program, the
Secretary shall designate eligible consortiums as manufacturing
communities through a competitive process.
(2) Eligible consortiums.--
(A) In general.--An eligible consortium is a
consortium that--
(i) represents a region defined by the
consortium in accordance with subparagraph (B);
(ii) includes at least one--
(I) institution of higher
education;
(II) a private sector entity; and
(III) a government entity;
(iii) may include one or more--
(I) private sector partners;
(II) institutions of higher
education;
(III) government entities;
(IV) economic development and other
community and labor groups;
(V) financial institutions; or
(VI) utilities;
(iv) has, as a lead applicant--
(I) a district organization (as
defined in section 300.3 of title 13,
Code of Federal Regulations, or
successor regulation);
(II) an Indian tribe (as defined in
section 4 of the Indian Self-
Determination and Education Assistance
Act (25 U.S.C. 450b)) or a consortium
of Indian tribes;
(III) a State or a political
subdivision of a State, including a
special purpose unit of a State or
local government engaged in economic or
infrastructure development activities,
or a consortium of political
subdivisions;
(IV) an institution of higher
education or a consortium of
institutions of higher education; or
(V) a public or private nonprofit
organization or association that has an
application that is supported by a
State, a political subdivision of a
State, or a native community.
(B) Regions.--Subject to approval by the Secretary,
a consortium may define the region that it represents
if the region--
(i) is large enough to contain critical
elements of the key technologies or supply
chain prioritized by the consortium; and
(ii) is small enough to enable close
collaboration among members of the consortium.
(3) Duration.--Each designation under paragraph (1) shall
be for a period of two years.
(4) Renewal.--
(A) In general.--Upon receipt of an application
submitted under subparagraph (B), the Secretary may
renew a designation made under paragraph (1) for up to
two additional two-year periods. Any designation as a
manufacturing community or renewal of such designation
that is in effect before the date of the enactment of
this Act shall count toward the limit set forth in this
subparagraph.
(B) Application for renewal.--An eligible
consortium seeking a renewal under subparagraph (A)
shall submit an application to the Secretary at such
time, in such manner, and containing such information
as the Secretary may require.
(C) Modifications authorized.--The Secretary may
renew a designation under subparagraph (A) for an
eligible consortium that--
(i) has changed its composition, either by
adding or removing members; or
(ii) as part of its application under
subparagraph (B), submits a revision to the
plan submitted under paragraph (5)(B)(iv) or
the strategy submitted under paragraph
(5)(B)(v).
(D) Evaluation for renewal.--In determining whether
to renew a designation of an eligible consortium under
paragraph (1), the Secretary shall assess the eligible
consortium based upon--
(i) the performance of the consortium
against the terms of the consortium's most
recent designation under paragraph (1) and any
post-designation awards the consortium may have
received;
(ii) the progress the consortium has made
with respect to project-specific metrics the
consortium proposed in the consortium's
application for the most recent designation
under paragraph (1), particularly with respect
to those metrics that were designed to help
communities track their own progress;
(iii) whether any changes to the
composition of the eligible consortium or
revisions to the plan or strategy described in
subparagraph (C)(ii) would improve the
competitiveness of United States manufacturing;
and
(iv) such other criteria as the Secretary
considers appropriate.
(5) Application for designation.--
(A) In general.--An eligible consortium seeking a
designation under paragraph (1) shall submit an
application to the Secretary at such time and in such
manner as the Secretary may require.
(B) Contents.--Each application submitted to the
Secretary under subparagraph (A) include--
(i) a description of the regional
boundaries of the consortium;
(ii) a description of the manufacturing
concentration of the consortium, including an
assessment of how the manufacturing
concentration of the consortium competitively
ranks nationally according to measures relating
to employment, sales, location quotients for an
industry's level of concentration, or such
other measures as the Secretary considers
appropriate;
(iii) an integrated assessment of the local
industrial ecosystem of the region of the
consortium, which may include assessment of
workforce and training, such as that involving
women and underrepresented minorities, supplier
network, research and innovation,
infrastructure or site development, trade and
international investment, operational
improvements, and capital access components
needed for manufacturing activities in such
region;
(iv) an evidence-based plan for developing
components of such ecosystem (selected by the
consortium)--
(I) by making specific investments
to address gaps in such ecosystem; and
(II) by making the manufacturing of
the region of the consortium uniquely
competitive;
(v) a description of the investments the
consortium proposes and the implementation
strategy the consortium intends to use to
address gaps in such ecosystem;
(vi) a description of the outcome-based
metrics, benchmarks, and milestones that the
consortium will track and the evaluation
methods the consortium will use while
designated as a manufacturing community to
gauge performance of the strategy of the
consortium to improve the manufacturing in the
region of the consortium; and
(vii) such other matters as the Secretary
considers appropriate.
(6) Evaluation of applications.--The Secretary shall
evaluate each application received under paragraph (5) to
determine--
(A) whether the applicant demonstrates a
significant level of regional cooperation in their
proposal; and
(B) how the manufacturing concentration of the
applicant competitively ranks nationally according to
measures described in paragraph (5)(B)(ii).
(7) Certain communities previously recognized.--Each
consortium that was designated as a manufacturing community by
the Secretary in carrying out the Investing in Manufacturing
Communities Partnership initiative of the Department of
Commerce before the date of the enactment of this Act shall be
deemed a manufacturing community designated under this
subsection if such consortium is still designated as a
manufacturing community by the Secretary as part of such
initiative.
(c) Support for Designated Manufacturing Communities.--
(1) Preferential consideration.--
(A) In general.--Except as provided in subparagraph
(D), if a member of a consortium designated as a
manufacturing community under subsection (b) seeks
financial or technical assistance under a participating
program of a participating agency, the head of such
agency may give preferential consideration to such
member with respect to the awarding of such financial
or technical assistance if--
(i) such head considers the award of the
financial or technical assistance consistent
with the economic development strategy of the
consortium; and
(ii) the member otherwise meets all
applicable requirements for the financial or
technical assistance.
(B) Participating agencies.--The Secretary shall
invite other Federal agencies to become participating
agencies of the Manufacturing Community Support
Program.
(C) Participating programs.--The head of each
participating agency shall identify all programs
administered by such participating agency that are
applicable to the Manufacturing Community Support
Program.
(D) Multiple members of the same consortium seeking
the same financial or technical assistance.--
(i) In general.--If a participating agency
receives applications for the same financial or
technical assistance from more than one member
of the same consortium designated as a
manufacturing community under subsection (b),
the head of such agency may determine how
preference will be given under subparagraph
(A), including by requiring the consortium to
select which of the members should be given
preference.
(ii) Coordination.--If the head of a
participating agency determines that more than
one member of a consortium should be given
preference for financial or technical
assistance under subparagraph (A), he or she
may require such members to demonstrate
coordination with each other in developing
their applications for the financial or
technical assistance.
(E) Report.--Not later than 90 days after the date
of the enactment of this Act, the head of each
participating agency shall submit a report to the
Secretary that specifies how the head will give
preferential consideration under subparagraph (A).
(2) Technical assistance.--The Secretary may make a Federal
point of contact available to each consortium designated as a
manufacturing community under subsection (b) to help the
members of the consortium access Federal funds and technical
assistance.
(3) Financial and technical assistance.--
(A) In general.--Under the Manufacturing Community
Support Program, the head of a participating agency may
award financial or technical assistance to a member of
a consortium designated as a manufacturing community
under subsection (b) as he or she considers appropriate
for purposes of such program and consistent with the
economic development strategy of the consortium.
(B) Use of funds.--
(i) In general.--A recipient of financial
or technical assistance under subparagraph (A)
may use such financial or technical assistance
to support an investment in an ecosystem that
will improve the competitiveness of United
States manufacturing.
(ii) Investments supported.--Investments
supported under this subparagraph may include--
(I) infrastructure;
(II) access to capital;
(III) promotion of exports and
foreign direct investment;
(IV) equipment or facility
upgrades;
(V) workforce training, retraining,
or recruitment and retention, including
that of women and underrepresented
minorities;
(VI) energy or process efficiency;
(VII) business incubators;
(VIII) site preparation;
(IX) advanced research;
(X) supply chain development; and
(XI) small business assistance.
(4) Coordination.--
(A) Coordination by secretary of commerce.--The
Secretary shall coordinate with the heads of the
participating agencies to identify programs under
paragraph (1)(C).
(B) Inter-agency coordination.--The heads of the
participating agencies shall coordinate with each
other--
(i) to leverage complementary activities,
including from non-Federal sources, such as
philanthropies; and
(ii) to avoid duplication of efforts.
(d) Receipt of Transferred Funds.--The Secretary may accept amounts
transferred to the Secretary from the head of another participating
agency to carry out this section.

Output: Make It In America Manufacturing Communities Act This bill requires the Department of Commerce to establish a Manufacturing Community Support Program to improve the competitiveness of U.S. manufacturing by: (1) designating consortiums as manufacturing communities, and (2) authorizing federal agencies electing to participate in the program to provide such communities preferential consideration in awarding financial and technical assistance. A consortium, to be eligible for such designation and assistance, must: represent a region that is large enough to contain critical elements of the key technologies or supply chain prioritized by the consortium and small enough to enable close collaboration among the consortium's members; include at least one institution of higher education, a private sector entity, and a government entity; and have a lead applicant that is a district organization, an Indian tribe, a state or political subdivision of a state, an institution of higher education, a nonprofit organization or association with an application supported by a state, a political subdivision of a state, or a native community. Commerce shall make such designations for a two-year period, and may renew a designation for additional two-year periods, based on specified criteria. Recipients may use such financial or technical assistance to support investments in ecosystems that will improve the competitiveness of U.S. manufacturing, including infrastructure, access to capital, promotion of exports and foreign direct investment, equipment upgrades, workforce training and recruitment, energy or process efficiency, business incubators, site preparation, advanced research, supply chain development, and small business assistance.

Input: Consider Input: SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ''Review EPA's Language on Agriculture
and Thoroughly Engage with the Farm Act of 2013'' or the ''RELATE with
the Farm Act of 2013''.

SEC. 2. REGULATORY REVIEW BY THE SECRETARY OF AGRICULTURE.

(a) Review of Regulatory Agenda.--The Secretary of Agriculture
shall review publications that may give notice that the Environmental
Protection Agency is preparing or plans to prepare any guidance,
policy, memorandum, regulation, or statement of general applicability
and future effect that may have a significant impact on a substantial
number of agricultural entities, including--
(1) any regulatory agenda of the Environmental Protection
Agency published pursuant to section 602 of title 5, United
States Code;
(2) any regulatory plan or agenda published by the
Environmental Protection Agency or the Office of Management and
Budget pursuant to an Executive order, including Executive
Order 12866; and
(3) any other publication issued by the Environmental
Protection Agency or the Office of Management and Budget that
may reasonably be foreseen to contain notice of plans by the
Environmental Protection Agency to prepare any guidance,
policy, memorandum, regulation, or statement of general
applicability and future effect that may have a significant
impact on a substantial number of agricultural entities.
(b) Information Gathering.--For a publication item reviewed under
subsection (a) that the Secretary determines may have a significant
impact on a substantial number of agricultural entities, the Secretary
shall--
(1) solicit from the Administrator of the Environmental
Protection Agency any information the Administrator may provide
to facilitate a review of the publication item;
(2) utilize the Chief Economist of the Department of
Agriculture to produce an economic impact statement for the
publication item that contains a detailed estimate of potential
costs to agricultural entities;
(3) identify individuals representative of potentially
affected agricultural entities for the purpose of obtaining
advice and recommendations from such individuals about the
potential impacts of the publication item; and
(4) convene a review panel for analysis of the publication
item that includes the Secretary, any full-time Federal
employee of the Department of Agriculture appointed to the
panel by the Secretary, and any employee of the Environmental
Protection Agency or the Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs within the Office of Management and Budget that accepts
an invitation from the Secretary to participate in the panel.
(c) Duties of the Review Panel.--A review panel convened for a
publication item under subsection (b)(4) shall--
(1) review any information or material obtained by the
Secretary and prepared in connection with the publication item,
including any draft proposed guidance, policy, memorandum,
regulation, or statement of general applicability and future
effect;
(2) collect advice and recommendations from agricultural
entity representatives identified by the Administrator after
consultation with the Secretary;
(3) compile and analyze such advice and recommendations;
and
(4) make recommendations to the Secretary based on the
information gathered by the review panel or provided by
agricultural entity representatives.
(d) Comments.--
(1) In general.--Not later than 60 days after the date the
Secretary convenes a review panel pursuant to subsection
(b)(4), the Secretary shall submit to the Administrator
comments on the planned or proposed guidance, policy,
memorandum, regulation, or statement of general applicability
and future effect for consideration and inclusion in any
related administrative record, including--
(A) a report by the Secretary on the concerns of
agricultural entities;
(B) the findings of the review panel;
(C) the findings of the Secretary, including any
adopted findings of the review panel; and
(D) recommendations of the Secretary.
(2) Publication.--The Secretary shall publish the comments
in the Federal Register and make the comments available to the
public on the public Internet website of the Department of
Agriculture.
(e) Waivers.--The Secretary may waive initiation of the review
panel under subsection (b)(4) as the Secretary determines appropriate.
(f) Definition of Agricultural Entity.--In this section, the term
''agricultural entity'' means any entity involved in or related to
agricultural enterprise, including enterprises that are engaged in the
business of production of food and fiber, ranching and raising of
livestock, aquaculture, and all other farming and agricultural related
industries.

Output: Review EPA's Language on Agriculture and Thoroughly Engage with the Farm Act of 2013 or the RELATE with the Farm Act of 2013 - Directs the Secretary of Agriculture (USDA) to review publications that may give notice that the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is preparing or plans to prepare any guidance, policy, memorandum, regulation, or statement of general applicability and future effect that may have a significant impact on a substantial number of agricultural entities. Requires the Secretary, for each publication item determined to have a possible significant impact, to: (1) solicit from the EPA Administrator information to facilitate a review of the item, (2) produce an economic impact statement, (3) identify representatives of potentially affected agricultural entities to obtain advice and recommendations about the potential impacts of the item, and (4) convene a review panel that includes the Secretary to analyze the publication item. Provides procedures for submission by the Secretary of comments to the Administrator for inclusion in the administrative record and for waiver of a panel's initiation.

Input: Consider Input: SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ''Fracturing Regulations are Effective
in State Hands Act''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

Congress finds that--
(1) hydraulic fracturing is a commercially viable practice
that has been used in the United States for more than 60 years
in more than 1,000,000 wells;
(2) the Ground Water Protection Council, a national
association of State water regulators that is considered to be
a leading groundwater protection organization in the United
States, released a report entitled ''State Oil and Natural Gas
Regulations Designed to Protect Water Resources'' and dated May
2009 finding that the ''current State regulation of oil and gas
activities is environmentally proactive and preventive'';
(3) that report also concluded that ''[a]ll oil and gas
producing States have regulations which are designed to provide
protection for water resources'';
(4) a 2004 study by the Environmental Protection Agency,
entitled ''Evaluation of Impacts to Underground Sources of
Drinking Water by Hydraulic Fracturing of Coalbed Methane
Reservoirs'', found no evidence of drinking water wells
contaminated by fracture fluid from the fracked formation;
(5) a 2009 report by the Ground Water Protection Council,
entitled ''State Oil and Natural Gas Regulations Designed to
Protect Water Resources'', found a ''lack of evidence'' that
hydraulic fracturing conducted in both deep and shallow
formations presents a risk of endangerment to ground water;
(6) a January 2009 resolution by the Interstate Oil and Gas
Compact Commission stated ''The states, who regulate
production, have comprehensive laws and regulations to ensure
operations are safe and to protect drinking water. States have
found no verified cases of groundwater contamination associated
with hydraulic fracturing.'';
(7) on May 24, 2011, before the Oversight and Government
Reform Committee of the House of Representatives, Lisa Jackson,
the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency,
testified that she was ''not aware of any proven case where the
fracking process itself has affected water'';
(8) in 2011, Bureau of Land Management Director Bob Abbey
stated, ''We have not seen evidence of any adverse effect as a
result of the use of the chemicals that are part of that
fracking technology.'';
(9)(A) activities relating to hydraulic fracturing (such as
surface discharges, wastewater disposal, and air emissions) are
already regulated at the Federal level under a variety of
environmental statutes, including portions of--
(i) the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33
U.S.C. 1251 et seq.);
(ii) the Safe Drinking Water Act (42 U.S.C. 300f et
seq.); and
(iii) the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.);
but
(B) Congress has continually elected not to include the
hydraulic fracturing process in the underground injection
control program under the Safe Drinking Water Act (42 U.S.C.
300f et seq.);
(10) in 2011, the Secretary of the Interior announced the
intention to promulgate new Federal regulations governing
hydraulic fracturing on Federal land;
(11) a February 2012 study by the Energy Institute at the
University of Texas at Austin, entitled ''Fact-Based Regulation
for Environmental Protection in Shale Gas Development'', found
that ''[n]o evidence of chemicals from hydraulic fracturing
fluid has been found in aquifers as a result of fracturing
operations''; and
(12) on October 1, 2014, the Ground Water Protection
Council and State Oil and Gas Regulatory Exchange released a
report entitled ''State Oil and Gas Regulations Designed to
Protect Water Resources'' that describes the cutting edge of
State-based oil and gas regulations, concluding that ''In step
with dramatic industry growth over the past five years, states
have substantially improved groundwater protection laws and
regulations governing oil and natural gas production.''.

SEC. 3. DEFINITION OF FEDERAL LAND.

In this Act, the term ''Federal land'' means--
(1) public lands (as defined in section 103 of the Federal
Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1702));
(2) National Forest System land;
(3) land under the jurisdiction of the Bureau of
Reclamation; and
(4) land under the jurisdiction of the Corps of Engineers.

SEC. 4. STATE AUTHORITY.

(a) In General.--A State shall have the sole authority to
promulgate or enforce any regulation, guidance, or permit requirement
regarding the treatment of a well by the application of fluids under
pressure to which propping agents may be added for the expressly
designed purpose of initiating or propagating fractures in a target
geologic formation in order to enhance production of oil, natural gas,
or geothermal production activities on or under any land within the
boundaries of the State.
(b) Federal Land.--The treatment of a well by the application of
fluids under pressure to which propping agents may be added for the
expressly designed purpose of initiating or propagating fractures in a
target geologic formation in order to enhance production of oil,
natural gas, or geothermal production activities on Federal land shall
be subject to the law of the State in which the land is located.
Output: Fracturing Regulations are Effective in State Hands Act This bill gives states the sole authority to promulgate or enforce any regulation, guidance, or permit requirement regarding hydraulic fracturing on or under any land within their boundaries. Hydraulic fracturing or fracking is a process to extract underground resources such as oil or gas from a geologic formation by injecting water, a propping agent (e.g., sand), and chemical additives into a well under enough pressure to fracture the geological formation. Hydraulic fracturing on federal land must comply with the law of the state in which the land is located.