We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control) into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Ex Input:
Sent1: We tell them what was meant when the law passed, but even these gun owners do not care what was meant, they only care what the law says!
Sent2: Which passed the law requireing "smart guns", if they ever become available (right now they do not exist).

Ex Output:
Not similar

Ex Input:
Sent1: I see, so banning guns just stops law abiding citizens from having them, yet your family of criminals buys them from people who legally obtained them, or has them legally obtained for them.
Sent2: That most people can't be trusted, so we should have more laws against guns, which most people will abide by because they can be trusted.

Ex Output:
Not similar

Ex Input:
Sent1: Are you saying that the only reason there are criminals armed with guns is because we're not willing to accept gun prohibitions as the answer?
Sent2: Something else you must keep in mind is that if we outlaw guns, the only people with guns will be outlaws, this leaves no defense for law abiding citizens.

Ex Output:
Not similar