Given a paragraph about movies, and a set of conversational question answers about the paragraph, answer a follow-up question from the paragraph. The paragraph has the prefix 'CONTEXT:'. Each conversation question has a prefix 'Q:' followed by the answer prefix 'A:', and the follow-up question has a prefix 'FOLLOWUP_Q:'.

Ex Input:
CONTEXT: I think the ending is intentionally ambiguous, so each member of the audience can draw their own conclusion. Even if Ottway kills the Alpha, will the rest of the pack let him survive? If you watched past the credits, you saw that there was a very short (maybe two seconds) scene where we see Ottway and the Alpha wolf after they fight. They're both alive, but badly injured. Ottway's head is resting on top of the wolf's body. Since both are so badly injured, I think it's unlikely that either one of them will survive. <sep> Q: What happened at the end of The Grey? A: I think the ending is intentionally ambiguous, so each member of the audience can draw their own conclusion Q: Oh Well did Ottway fdie or survive A: If you watched past the credits, you saw that there was a very short (maybe two seconds) scene where we see Ottway and the Alpha wolf after they fight. They're both alive, but badly injured <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Oh Ok so 3whsat happened at ther end?

Ex Output:
I think the ending is intentionally ambiguous, so each member of the audience can draw their own conclusion

Ex Input:
CONTEXT: She states in the movie that after she received a blood transfusion she could feel the ability had left her. Cage also notes this when he wakes up in a military hospital after a botched attempt to retrieve the transponder prototype, as the result of a blood transfusion. As such, it would seem the ability is something you can feel, and thus you can tell when you've lost it. <sep> Q: How does Rita Vrataski find out that she lost her power to "reset" her day without killing herself? A: she could feel the ability had left her <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Why would should lose her power after a blood transfusion?

Ex Output:
botched attempt

Ex Input:
CONTEXT: The source material is essentially a recollection of a life lived by an individual on his death bed. We are seeing these things through the lens of memory, so it is meant to be an almost first person account. There are other moments in the film where things move around for no apparent reason and the stage itself does not move in accordance with objective reality. That particular scene is from "Swann In Love" by Proust and it was an attempt at capturing visually some measure of Swann's emotive memory of a musical experience from that story. I won't comment on whether it was successful. The closest thing I can think at this moment that has this sort of movement might be in Wes Anderson movies where suddenly the naturalistic feel is broken in favor of a staged play: the Zissou movie and "Moonrise Kingdom" both take similar but more obvious breaks from naturalism. <sep> Q: Why is the audience sliding around in this scene from Le Temps retrouve? A: We are seeing these things through the lens of memory, so it is meant to be an almost first person account <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: A first person account of what exactly?

Ex Output:
That particular scene is from "Swann In Love" by Proust and it was an attempt at capturing visually some measure of Swann's emotive memory of a musical experience from that story