Problem: Mark's dog returns<br>Mark had lost his dog over a month ago. He missed his dog very much. One evening while mowing the lawn he notices something. He sees a dog in the street that looked like his lost dog. It turns out to be his lost dog who had returned home.

Based on the paragraph above can we conclude that "Mark killed his dog"?

A: No

Problem: What I've done is, it says that there's no extraneous unpublished material questioning. That's the clarity that I need. And then, quite frankly, my mindset is, if the issue of the defendants is that we were biased in our reporting because we either misquoted somebody or whatever, well, this isn't a jury trial.

Based on the paragraph above can we conclude that "No one will be summoned to jury duty in this trial"?

A: Yes

Problem: Everything for charity<br>Norman believed a lot in charity. He liked to go from door to door and ask for money. Until one day a man shoved him on the doormat and scared him. Norman since then doesn't go from door to door. He calls people on the phone instead.

Based on the paragraph above can we conclude that "Norman was shoved by someone with a different gender than him."?

A:
No