Detailed Instructions: In this task, you are given text for US Congressional and California state bills, your task is to generate a summary for this bill.
See one example below:
Problem: SECTION 1. LIABILITY OF BUSINESS ENTITIES PROVIDING USE OF FACILITIES
TO NONPROFIT ORGANIZATIONS.

(a) Definitions.--In this section:
(1) Business entity.--The term ''business entity'' means a
firm, corporation, association, partnership, consortium, joint
venture, or other form of enterprise.
(2) Facility.--The term ''facility'' means any real
property, including any building, improvement, or appurtenance.
(3) Gross negligence.--The term ''gross negligence'' means
voluntary and conscious conduct by a person with knowledge (at
the time of the conduct) that the conduct is likely to be
harmful to the health or well-being of another person.
(4) Intentional misconduct.--The term ''intentional
misconduct'' means conduct by a person with knowledge (at the
time of the conduct) that the conduct is harmful to the health
or well-being of another person.
(5) Nonprofit organization.--The term ''nonprofit
organization'' means--
(A) any organization described in section 501(c)(3)
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and exempt from
tax under section 501(a) of such Code; or
(B) any not-for-profit organization organized and
conducted for public benefit and operated primarily for
charitable, civic, educational, religious, welfare, or
health purposes.
(6) State.--The term ''State'' means each of the several
States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto
Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, the Northern
Mariana Islands, any other territory or possession of the
United States, or any political subdivision of any such State,
territory, or possession.
(b) Limitation on Liability.--
(1) In general.--Subject to subsection (c), a business
entity shall not be subject to civil liability relating to any
injury or death occurring at a facility of the business entity
in connection with a use of such facility by a nonprofit
organization if--
(A) the use occurs outside of the scope of business
of the business entity;
(B) such injury or death occurs during a period
that such facility is used by the nonprofit
organization; and
(C) the business entity authorized the use of such
facility by the nonprofit organization.
(2) Application.--This subsection shall apply--
(A) with respect to civil liability under Federal
and State law; and
(B) regardless of whether a nonprofit organization
pays for the use of a facility.
(c) Exception for Liability.--Subsection (b) shall not apply to an
injury or death that results from an act or omission of a business
entity that constitutes gross negligence or intentional misconduct,
including any misconduct that--
(1) constitutes a crime of violence (as that term is
defined in section 16 of title 18, United States Code) or act
of international terrorism (as that term is defined in section
2331 of title 18) for which the defendant has been convicted in
any court;
(2) constitutes a hate crime (as that term is used in the
Hate Crime Statistics Act (28 U.S.C. 534 note));
(3) involves a sexual offense, as defined by applicable
State law, for which the defendant has been convicted in any
court; or
(4) involves misconduct for which the defendant has been
found to have violated a Federal or State civil rights law.
(d) Superseding Provision.--
(1) In general.--Subject to paragraph (2) and subsection
(e), this Act preempts the laws of any State to the extent that
such laws are inconsistent with this Act, except that this Act
shall not preempt any State law that provides additional
protection from liability for a business entity for an injury
or death with respect to which conditions under subparagraphs
(A) through (C) of subsection (b)(1) apply.
(2) Limitation.--Nothing in this Act shall be construed to
supersede any Federal or State health or safety law.
(e) Election of State Regarding Nonapplicability.--This Act shall
not apply to any civil action in a State court against a business
entity in which all parties are citizens of the State if such State
enacts a statute--
(1) citing the authority of this subsection;
(2) declaring the election of such State that this Act
shall not apply to such civil action in the State; and
(3) containing no other provision.
Solution: Shields a business entity from civil liability relating to any injury or death occurring at a facility of that entity in connection with a use of such facility by a nonprofit organization if: (1) the use occurs outside the scope of business of the business entity; (2) such injury or death occurs during a period that such facility is used by such organization; and (3) the business entity authorized the use of such facility by the organization.
Makes this Act inapplicable to an injury or death that results from an act or omission of a business entity that constitutes gross negligence or intentional misconduct, including misconduct that: (1) constitutes a hate crime or a crime of violence or act of international terrorism for which the defendant has been convicted in any court; or (2) involves a sexual offense for which the defendant has been convicted in any court or misconduct for which the defendant has been found to have violated a Federal or State civil rights law.
Preempts State laws to the extent that such laws are inconsistent with this Act, except State law that provides additional protection from liability. Specifies that this Act shall not be construed to supersede any Federal or State health or safety law.
Makes this Act inapplicable to any civil action in a State court against a business entity in which all parties are citizens of the State if such State, citing this Act's authority and containing no other provision, enacts a statute declaring the State's election that this Act shall not apply to such action in the State.
Explanation: This Bill focuses on shielding business entities from civil liability relating to an injury or death depending on the conditions of injury, hence the generated summary is correct.

Problem: SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ''Comprehensive Learning Assessment
for Students and Schools (CLASS) Act''.

SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS REGARDING ADEQUATE YEARLY PROGRESS AND ASSESSMENTS.

(a) Continuous Growth Models.--Clause (iii) of section
1111(b)(2)(C) of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20
U.S.C. 6311(b)(2)(C)) is amended by striking ''for all students'' and
inserting ''for all students, as demonstrated by measures of students'
progress toward proficiency, including longitudinal growth''.
(b) Averaging Procedure.--Subparagraph (J) of section 1111(b)(2) of
the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C.
6311(b)(2)) is amended by adding at the end the following:
''(iv) The State may average data by other
means that are designed to increase the
stability of school-building results from year
to year.''.
(c) Adequate Yearly Progress by Group and Subject.--Section 1116(b)
of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C.
6316(b)) is amended--
(1) in subparagraph (A) of paragraph (1), by inserting
''with respect to the performance of a particular group of
students described in section 1111(b)(2)(C)(v) in the same
academic subject,'' after ''that fails, for 2 consecutive
years,'';
(2) in paragraph (5), by inserting ''with respect to the
performance of a particular group of students described in
section 1111(b)(2)(C)(v) in the same academic subject,'' after
''that fails to make adequate yearly progress,'';
(3) in subparagraph (C) of paragraph (7), by inserting
''with respect to the performance of a particular group of
students described in section 1111(b)(2)(C)(v) in the same
academic subject,'' after ''that fails to make adequate yearly
progress,''; and
(4) in subparagraph (A) of paragraph (8), by inserting
''with respect to the performance of a particular group of
students described in section 1111(b)(2)(C)(v) in the same
academic subject,'' after ''continues to fail to make adequate
yearly progress,''.
(d) Multiple Measures.--Subparagraph (A) of section 1111(b)(2) of
the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C.
6311(b)(2)) is amended--
(1) at the end of clause (ii), by striking ''and'';
(2) at the end of clause (iii), by striking the period and
inserting ''; and''; and
(3) at the end, by adding the following:
''(iv) include multiple measures of student
academic achievement, such as the proportion of
State report card indicators met, a performance
index score, student drop-out rate, and a
measure based on individual student achievement
gains over time, disaggregated by each of the
groups of students described in subparagraph
(C)(v).''.
(e) Cut Scores.--Clause (ii) of section 1111(b)(1)(D) of the
Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C.
6311(b)(1)(D)) is amended--
(1) in subclause (II), by striking ''and'' at the end;
(2) in subclause (III), by striking the period at the end
and inserting ''; and''; and
(3) by adding at the end the following:
''(IV) take into consideration the
continuum of achievement by children
within the advanced, proficient, and
basic levels of achievement described
in subclauses (II) and (III) and the
yearly progress by children within such
continuum.''.
(f) No First Score Requirement.--Clause (iv) of section
1111(b)(2)(C) of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20
U.S.C. 6311(b)(2)(C)) is amended--
(1) by striking ''(iv) measures'' and inserting ''(iv)(I)
measures'';
(2) by inserting ''and'' after ''in paragraph (3);''; and
(3) by adding at the end the following:
''(II) if a student takes an assessment
described in paragraph (3) for a particular
subject or grade level more than once, may use,
at the State's discretion, the student's
results from subsequent administrations of the
assessment;''.
(g) Limiting Transfer Options and Supplemental Services to Students
From Failing Groups.--Section 1116 of the Elementary and Secondary
Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 6316) is amended--
(1) in paragraphs (1)(E)(i), (5)(A), (7)(C)(i), and
(8)(A)(i) of subsection (b), by striking the term ''all
students enrolled in the school'' each place such term appears
and inserting ''all students enrolled in the school, who are
members of a group described in section 1111(b)(2)(C)(v) that
fails to make adequate yearly progress as defined in the
State's plan under section 1111(b)(2),'';
(2) in clause (vii) of subsection (c)(10)(C), by inserting
'', who are members of a group described in section
1111(b)(2)(C)(v) that fails to make adequate yearly progress as
defined in the State's plan under section 1111(b)(2),'' after
''Authorizing students''; and
(3) in subparagraph (A) of subsection (e)(12), by inserting
'', who is a member of a group described in section
1111(b)(2)(C)(v) that fails to make adequate yearly progress as
defined in the State's plan under section 1111(b)(2)'' after
''under section 1113(c)(1)''.
(h) Assessments.--Clause (ii) of section 1111(b)(3)(C) of the
Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C.
6311(b)(3)(C)) is amended to read as follows:
''(ii) be fully aligned with the State's
challenging academic content and student
academic achievement standards, be aligned with
curriculum and instruction to adequately assess
the effect of curriculum and instruction on
each such challenging academic content
standard, include individual test items (based
on technical criteria) that enable students to
achieve the items if the students received
appropriate instruction, and provide coherent
information about student attainment of the
State's challenging academic content and
student academic achievement standards;''.
(i) Assessing Students With Disabilities.--
(1) In general.--Subsection (b) of section 1111 of the
Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 6311)
is amended by adding at the end the following:
''(11) Children with disabilities.--
''(A) Modification of standards, assessments.--With
respect to a child with a disability, a State plan
shall provide for alternate challenging academic
content standards and challenging student academic
achievement standards under paragraph (1)(A), alternate
high standards of academic achievement described in
paragraph (2)(C)(i), and alternate yearly student
academic assessments described in paragraph (3), to
align such standards and assessments with the child's
individualized education program.
''(B) Determination of applicable assessment.--In
carrying out this paragraph, consistent with the
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, the
State--
''(i) shall allow the individualized
education program team of each child with a
disability in the State to determine whether an
alternate academic assessment should be
administered to the child in lieu of the
academic assessment otherwise required by
paragraph (3);
''(ii) shall require the individualized
education program team of the child to select
any such alternate academic assessment from
among the alternate assessments included in the
State's plan pursuant to subparagraph (C); and
''(iii) shall require that any alternate
academic assessment administered to a child
under this paragraph be more advanced than any
such assessment administered to the child in a
previous school year under this paragraph.
''(C) Alternative assessments.--Each State plan
shall include alternate academic assessments that may
be administered to children with disabilities for
purposes of complying with this paragraph.
''(D) Definition.--In this paragraph, the term
'individualized education program' has the meaning
given to that term in section 602 of the Individuals
with Disabilities Education Act.''.
(2) Rule of construction.--The amendment made by paragraph
(1) shall be construed as superseding the 2.0 percent cap at
section 200.13(c)(1) of title 34, Code of Federal Regulations
(imposing a cap on the number of children with disabilities
whose proficient and advanced scores, although based on
alternate achievement standards, may be included in calculating
adequate yearly progress).
(j) Students With Limited English Proficiency.--Paragraph (2) of
section 1111(b) of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965
(20 U.S.C. 6311(b)) is amended by adding at the end the following:
''(L) Students with limited english proficiency.--
Notwithstanding subparagraph (C)(v), a State may define
adequate yearly progress under subparagraph (C) in a
manner that measures the progress of students with
limited English proficiency--
''(i) by continuing to include in a group
of students described in subparagraph (C)(v)
students who attain proficiency in English; and
''(ii) by excluding the performance of
students with limited English proficiency who
have resided in the United States for less than
3 years and for whom native language
assessments in math and reading or language
arts are not available, so as to avoid any
distortion in measurement resulting from the
new arrivals of such students.''.
(k) Separate Starting Points.--Subparagraph (E) of section
1111(b)(2) (20 U.S.C. 6311(b)(2)) is amended by striking '', using data
for the 2001-2002 school year,'' and inserting '', for each group of
students described in subparagraph (C)(v),''.
Solution:
Comprehensive Learning Assessment for Students and Schools (CLASS) Act - Amends the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 to revise requirements affecting adequate yearly progress (AYP) assessments of students against state academic performance standards.

Allows AYP longitudinal growth calculations and the averaging of school data in a manner designed to stabilize school-building results from year to year.

Identifies a school as needing improvement, corrective action, or restructuring only on the basis of the unsatisfactory AYP of a particular group of students in the same academic subject for the requisite period of time.

Requires multiple measures of student academic achievement.

Requires academic achievement standards to calculate AYP within a continuum of achievement by children within advanced, proficient, and basic achievement levels.

Allows states to use the results of subsequent assessments of students who take more than one assessment for the same grade and subject.

Limits the provision of supplemental services and transfers to those students who fall within a group whose underperformance results in the school's failure to make AYP.

Requires state assessments to be aligned with curriculum and instruction so their effectiveness may be assessed.

Requires alternate standards and assessments for disabled children aligned with the child's individualized education program.

Allows states to measure the AYP of limited English proficient (LEP) children by including children that have attained English proficiency and excluding LEP children who have resided in the country for less than three years.

Allows states to set separate starting points for measuring the AYP of each student group.