IN: The attached list are outstanding receivables associated with the Central Region group that have occurred prior to December 2000. I would request that these receivables get written off in order to clean up the books. Total value $11,783.70. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to give me a call.

Generate a subject line.

OUT: Account Receivables
IN: This is an email
Hi MARK! The pictures arrived today. Your letter was dated April 6 so it took ten days. Tell Sukran Mother and I think she is beautiful. We sure enjoyed seeing them all. I made copies for Sue and Tom and will mail them this afternoon. Thank you so much. LOTS of LOVE and KISSES to YOU and Sukran from MOTHER and I. DAD

What is the subject?

OUT: Pictures
QUESTION: Missed your call today and I will be in RAC PRC all day tomorrow. Basically Jeff said we must get this exposure down but gave no parameters to the statement. He did ask if any recent issue is causing us concern to which we said no, and I also said we know more about this company than any other exposure we have (which we should). I also spoke with M. Kopper today and he thinks the proposed deal w/ TXU to pay slightly more for a plant with the proviso that we get a cleaner contract is a good idea, rather than paying a lot of money to an investment bank. Moral of story in my opinion is to try and improve deal structure with TXU through the plant purchase or other structured deal. Do no more (large) deals with TXU that significantly increase credit exposure ($10mm??) unless we buy a derivative that reduces exposure simultaneously. Continue to stay on top of TXU with frequent meetings with their management to maintain a close relationship with good communication. Lets try and discuss Wed if possible.
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: TXU Credit Exposure
Jim, my understanding is that there continues to be some discussion on whether there will be functional seperation of the retail and wholesale businesses and to what extent and under what strategy these are undertaken. I am not sure that we want to put ourselves in a box under any structure until these things are completely ironed out eg) country managers et al. I'm not in agreement with any memo that further details the organization beyond what was outlined in the original memo. However, I am in agreement that this needs to get resolved ASAP unfortunately Frevert and Skilling and most of the first world is out this week. I ask for your patience. Lets discuss. Regards
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: See Attached
> Political Philosophies Explained in Simple "Two Cow" Terms > > Socialism: You have two cows. You keep one and give one to your neighbor. > > Communism: You have two cows. The government takes them both and provides you with milk. > > Fascism: You have two cows. The government takes them and sells you the > milk. > > Bureaucracy: You have two cows. The government takes them both, shoots > one, milks the other, pays you for the milk, and then pours it down the > drain. > > Capitalism: You have two cows. You sell one and buy a bull. > > Corporate: You have two cows. You sell one, force the other to produce > the milk of four cows and then act surprised when it drops dead. > > Democracy: You have two cows. The government taxes you to the point that > you must sell them both in order to support a man in a foreign country > who has only one cow which was a gift from your government
Answer: Political Philosophies
Q: Nancy, Here are some come comments to the draft PPA: As a general note, we would have these goals: 1. Keep the PPA has streamlined as possible, putting as much as we can in the interconnection agreement. 2. Minimize ties to specific unit. 3. Maximize optionality, especially delivery points. 4. Keep construction/ownership of the facility off the balance sheet. 5. Signing the interconnection agreement must be simultaneous, or a CP. More specifically we would like to: Move start up/metering terms to interconnection agreement. Megawatts will probably change due to change in equipment. Bracket 192 for now. The capacity will change for summer and winter, also, specifics to be determined. Make sure we are protected from any liability caused by their delay. Comments on specific articles: Definition of emergency start up will belong in interconnection agreement. 2.2 Expiration is Dec. 31, 2004; move bracketed language into interconnect. 2.3 We need an out in case we don't commence construction/achieve commercial operation as a result of Buyer's action/inaction, and the term "breach" should include failure to timely perform any of buyer's obligations under any of the agreements. Any reason why we shouldn't want an extension if there is a delay due to action/inaction of any governmental authority? We can add change of law as an event which gives us schedule relief, but we might want to broaden the definition of change of law. Also, we don't have the site acquired yet, so we may need an out in case we encounter a problem, unless we will not sign this agreement before acquiring the site. 3.4 Peak period is July and August. 3.5 (b) Amount left over will depend on the summer and winter capacity. Might just leave blanks as placeholders. 3.5 (c) Let's try for 4 hours notice. 3.5 (d) suggest title "Start-Up Minimum Run Time". 3.5 (e) add maximum of ___ per year.
Propose a subject line
A:
VEPCO PPA