input question: Thorn and the Kal helped spike the rivers. If this premise is true, does that tell us:"They helped spike the rivers."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: yes

Question:
Based on the premise "He banned their activities in 1612 and two years later ordered the expulsion of all missionaries and unrepentant Japanese converts.", can we conclude that "He banned and expelled the missionaries in 1620 because they were annoying."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
no

Question: Sentence A: True monogamy, then, would seem a very worthwhile institution.

Sentence B: True monogamy is good for society.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Question: Fueled by conglomerate investment, publishers released more than 60,000 new titles in 1995, at least 10,000 more than in 1985.
The publishers only released a few titles because they couldn't be bothered
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Problem: Here is a premise:
The Thress model suggests that if the discount remains unchanged, and thus that shifting is not allowed, the elasticity of basic volume is negative 0.189 and of workshared volume is negative 0.289.

Here is a hypothesis:
The elasticity of basic volume is negative 0.189 according to the Thress model.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Question:
But I sometimes fancy I see a shadow behind." 185 "You mean?"

Does it follow that ""I sometimes think that I see a shadow behind", "What do you mean?""?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
yes