If In sum, the legislative history of the presence requirement confirms that Congress intended to provide meaningful representation to eligible aliens, including H-2A workers on claims arising from their employment contract; and that Congress did not understand the presence requirement to severely alter or restrict this representation., can we conclude that "The presence requirement existed to deal with claims arising from employment contracts."?
Choose from: (a). yes; (b). it is not possible to tell; (c). no;
(b).