TASK DEFINITION: In this task, you are given text for US Congressional and California state bills, your task is to generate a summary for this bill.
PROBLEM: SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ''Networking Electronically To Connect
Our Police Act of 2001'' or the ''NET COP Act''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS; PURPOSES.

(a) Findings.--Congress finds that--
(1) Internet-based crime-fighting, investigatory, and
information-sharing technologies have proven to be extremely
useful to the law enforcement agencies that use them;
(2) the sharing of information and the dissemination of
criminal intelligence between and among Federal, State, and
local law enforcement agencies benefit the society at large by
making criminal investigations more inclusive and effective;
(3) the sharing of information between and among Federal,
State, and local law enforcement agencies allows these agencies
to find missing, neglected, abused, or abducted children, as
well as non-custodial parents seeking to evade their legal or
financial responsibilities; and
(4) police departments in rural areas of the country tend
to be underserved by these Internet-based technologies.
(b) Purposes.--The purposes of this Act are--
(1) to authorize the Department of Justice to make grants
to rural police departments for the purchase or upgrade of
computer equipment, and to pay for Internet access for crime-
fighting, investigatory, or information-sharing purposes;
(2) to reimburse police department officials or members
who, acting on behalf of their rural police departments and
using personal funds, have purchased computer equipment or paid
for Internet access for crime-fighting, investigatory, or
information-sharing purposes; and
(3) to require annual reports to Congress on the
concentration of police departments that have Internet access,
particularly those departments serving rural areas.

SEC. 3. GRANTS AUTHORIZED.

The Attorney General is authorized to award grants to rural police
departments to--
(1) enable those departments to gain access to the various
crime-fighting, investigatory, and information sharing
resources available on the Internet; and
(2) reimburse rural police department officials and members
for the cost of computer equipment or Internet access.

SEC. 4. USE OF FUNDS.

Grants awarded under this Act may be used--
(1) for the purchase of new or upgraded computer hardware
or software;
(2) to pay for Internet access; and
(3) to reimburse rural police departments that have paid
for computer equipment or Internet access out of the funds of
the department or department official or members, for some or
all of the costs associated with those purchases, as determined
by the Attorney General.

SEC. 5. APPLICATION.

Each eligible rural police department that desires a grant under
this Act shall submit an application to the Attorney General at such
time, in such manner, and accompanied by such information as the
Attorney General may reasonably require.

SEC. 6. GRANT PROGRAM CRITERIA.

(a) In General.--In awarding a grant under this Act, the Attorney
General shall--
(1) set criteria for determining which police departments
are currently underserved by crime-fighting, investigatory, or
information-sharing technologies available on the Internet, by
differentiating between police departments that do not have
Internet access, and those departments that have access but are
using outmoded, obsolete, or otherwise inadequate technology;
and
(2) determine what would constitute the minimum feasible
package of technologies required to enable those police
departments to use existing crime-fighting, investigatory, and
information-sharing technologies.
(b) Grant Limitations.--The Attorney General shall set limits for
maximum annual grants, based on determinations made under subsection
(a), for rural police departments that do not have Internet access, and
for those that do have access but are using inadequate technology.

SEC. 7. POLICE DEPARTMENT TECHNOLOGY ASSISTANCE DESK.

The Attorney General shall establish a Police Department Technology
Assistance Desk to offer advice to chiefs of police in rural police
departments regarding--
(1) the types of products to buy in order to achieve not
less than a minimum level of Internet service to access
existing crime-fighting, investigatory, and information-sharing
technologies; and
(2) technology upgrades for those police departments in
possession of outmoded or obsolete technology;
(3) preferred vendors; and
(4) any other information the Attorney General determines
to be necessary.

SEC. 8. REPORT TO CONGRESS.

The General Accounting Office, in consultation with the Attorney
General, shall annually report to Congress on the concentration of
police departments in the country that have Internet access, with
particular emphasis on the number and percentage of rural police
departments that lack Internet access, especially high-speed Internet
access.

SEC. 9. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

There is authorized to be appropriated $500,000,000 for each of
fiscal years 2002 through 2007 to carry out this Act.

SOLUTION: Networking Electronically To Connect Our Police Act of 2001 or NET COP Act - Authorizes the Attorney General to award grants to rural police departments to: (1) enable those departments to gain access to the various crime-fighting, investigatory, and information sharing resources available on the Internet; and (2) reimburse rural police department officials and members for the cost of computer equipment or Internet access.Allows grants awarded to be used: (1) for the purchase of new or upgraded computer hardware or software; (2) to pay for Internet access; and (3) to reimburse rural police departments that have paid for computer equipment or Internet access out of the funds of the department or department officials or members for some or all of the costs associated with those purchases, as determined by the Attorney General.Sets forth provisions regarding grant application requirements and grant program criteria.Directs the Attorney General to establish a Police Department Technology Assistance Desk to offer advice to chiefs of police in rural police departments.

PROBLEM: SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ''Office of Strategic Services
Congressional Gold Medal Act''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

The Congress finds the following:
(1) The Office of Strategic Services (OSS) was America's
first effort to implement a system of strategic intelligence
during World War II and provided the basis for the modern-day
American intelligence and special operations communities. The
U.S. Special Operations Command and the National Clandestine
Service chose the OSS spearhead as their insignias.
(2) OSS founder General William J. Donovan is the only
person in American history to receive our Nation's four highest
decorations, including the Medal of Honor. Upon learning of his
death in 1959, President Eisenhower called General Donovan the
''last hero''. In addition to founding and leading the OSS,
General Donovan was also selected by President Roosevelt, who
called him his ''secret legs'', as an emissary to Great Britain
and continental Europe before the United States entered World
War II.
(3) All the military branches during World War II
contributed personnel to the OSS. The present-day Special
Operations Forces trace their lineage to the OSS. Its Maritime
Unit was a precursor to the U.S. Navy SEALs. The OSS
Operational Groups and Jedburghs were forerunners to U.S. Army
Special Forces. The 801st/492nd Bombardment Group
(''Carpetbaggers'') were progenitors to the Air Force Special
Operations Command. The Marines who served in the OSS,
including the actor Sterling Hayden (a Silver Star recipient),
Col. William Eddy (a Distinguished Service Cross recipient who
was described as the ''nearest thing the United States has had
to a Lawrence of Arabia''), and Col. Peter Ortiz (a two-time
Navy Cross recipient), were predecessors to the Marine Special
Operations Command. U.S. Coast Guard personnel were recruited
for the Maritime Unit and its Operational Swimmer Group.
(4) The OSS organized, trained, supplied, and fought with
resistance organizations throughout Europe and Asia that played
an important role in America's victory during World War II.
General Eisenhower credited the OSS's covert contribution in
France to the equivalent to having an extra military division.
General Eisenhower told General Donovan that if it did nothing
else, the photographic reconnaissance conducted by the OSS
prior to the D-Day Invasion justified its creation.
(5) Four future directors of central intelligence served as
OSS officers: William Casey, William Colby, Allen Dulles, and
Richard Helms.
(6) Women comprised more than one-third of OSS personnel
and played a critical role in the organization. They included
Virginia Hall, the only civilian female to receive a
Distinguished Service Cross in World War II, and Julia Child.
(7) OSS recruited Fritz Kolbe, a German diplomat who became
America's most important spy against the Nazis in World War II.
(8) America's leading scientists and scholars served in the
OSS Research and Analysis Branch, including Ralph Bunche, the
first African-American to receive the Nobel Peace Prize;
Pulitzer Prize-winning historian Arthur Schlesinger, Jr.;
Supreme Court Justice Arthur Goldberg; Sherman Kent; John King
Fairbank; and Walt Rostow. Its ranks included seven future
presidents of the American Historical Association, five of the
American Economic Association, and two Nobel laureates.
(9) The U.S. Department of State's Bureau of Intelligence
and Research traces its creation to the OSS Research and
Analysis Branch.
(10) James Donovan, who was portrayed by Tom Hanks in the
Steven Spielberg movie ''Bridge of Spies'' and negotiated the
release of U-2 pilot Francis Gary Powers, served as General
Counsel of the OSS.
(11) The OSS invented and employed new technology through
its Research and Development Branch, inventing new weapons and
revolutionary communications equipment. Dr. Christian
Lambertsen invented the first underwater rebreathing apparatus
that was first utilized by the OSS and is known today as SCUBA.
(12) OSS Detachment 101 operated in Burma and pioneered the
art of unconventional warfare. It was the first United States
unit to deploy a large guerrilla army deep in enemy territory.
It has been credited with the highest kill/loss ratio for any
infantry-type unit in American military history and was awarded
a Presidential Unit Citation.
(13) Its X-2 branch pioneered counterintelligence with the
British and established the modern counterintelligence
community. The network of contacts built by the OSS with
foreign intelligence services led to enduring Cold War
alliances.
(14) Operation Torch, the Allied invasion of French North
Africa in November 1942, was aided by the networks established
and information acquired by the OSS to guide Allied landings.
(15) OSS Operation Halyard rescued more than 500 downed
airmen trapped behind enemy lines in Yugoslavia, one of the
most daring and successful rescue operations of World War II.
(16) OSS ''Mercy Missions'' at the end of World War II
saved the lives of thousands of Allied prisoners of war whom it
was feared would be murdered by the Japanese.
(17) The handful of surviving men and women of the OSS whom
General Donovan said performed ''some of the bravest acts of
the war'' are members of the ''Greatest Generation''. They have
never been collectively recognized for their heroic and
pioneering service in World War II.

SEC. 3. CONGRESSIONAL GOLD MEDAL.

(a) Presentation Authorized.--The Speaker of the House of
Representatives and the President pro tempore of the Senate shall make
appropriate arrangements for the presentation, on behalf of the
Congress, of a gold medal of appropriate design in commemoration to the
members of the Office of Strategic Services (OSS), in recognition of
their superior service and major contributions during World War II.
(b) Design and Striking.--For purposes of the presentation referred
to in subsection (a), the Secretary of the Treasury (referred to in
this Act as the ''Secretary'') shall strike a gold medal with suitable
emblems, devices, and inscriptions, to be determined by the Secretary.
(c) Smithsonian Institution.--
(1) In general.--Following the award of the gold medal in
commemoration to the members of the Office of Strategic
Services under subsection (a), the gold medal shall be given to
the Smithsonian Institution, where it will be displayed as
appropriate and made available for research.
(2) Sense of congress.--It is the sense of Congress that
the Smithsonian Institution should make the gold medal received
under paragraph (1) available for display elsewhere,
particularly at other appropriate locations associated with the
Office of Strategic Services.

SEC. 4. DUPLICATE MEDALS.

The Secretary may strike and sell duplicates in bronze of the gold
medal struck pursuant to section 3 under such regulations as the
Secretary may prescribe, at a price sufficient to cover the cost
thereof, including labor, materials, dies, use of machinery, and
overhead expenses, and the cost of the gold medal.

SEC. 5. STATUS OF MEDALS.

(a) National Medals.--The medals struck pursuant to this Act are
national medals for purposes of chapter 51 of title 31, United States
Code.
(b) Numismatic Items.--For purposes of section 5134 of title 31,
United States Code, all medals struck under this Act shall be
considered to be numismatic items.

SOLUTION: Office of Strategic Services Congressional Gold Medal Act This bill requires the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the President pro tempore of the Senate to arrange for the presentation of a Congressional Gold Medal to the members of the Office of Strategic Services in recognition of their service and contributions during World War II.

PROBLEM: SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ''Law Enforcement Access to Data
Stored Abroad Act''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

Congress finds the following:
(1) The Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986
(Public Law 99-508; 100 Stat. 1848) (referred to in this
section as ''ECPA'') was intended to protect the privacy of
electronic communications stored with providers of electronic
communications services and remote computing services, while
balancing the legitimate needs of law enforcement to access
records stored by such providers.
(2) To strike this balance, ECPA authorized governmental
entities to obtain certain categories of communications data
from providers using established, pre-existing forms of
process--warrants and subpoenas. It also created a new form of
court order, in section 2703(d) of title 18, United States
Code, that governmental entities could use to obtain additional
types of communications data.
(3) It has been well established that courts in the United
States lack the power to issue warrants authorizing
extraterritorial searches and seizures, and neither ECPA nor
subsequent amendments extended the warrant power of courts in
the United States beyond the territorial reach of the United
States.
(4) Nevertheless, Congress also recognizes the legitimate
needs of law enforcement agencies in the United States to
obtain, through lawful process, electronic communications
relevant to criminal investigations related to United States
persons wherever that content may be stored. Therefore, this
Act authorizes the use of search warrants extraterritorially
only where the Government seeks to obtain the contents of
electronic communications belonging to a United States person.

SEC. 3. SCOPE AND CLARIFICATION OF WARRANT REQUIREMENT.

(a) In General.--Chapter 121 of title 18, United States Code, is
amended--
(1) in section 2702(a), by amending paragraph (3) to read
as follows:
''(3) a provider of remote computing service or electronic
communication service to the public shall not knowingly divulge
to any governmental entity the contents of any communication
described in section 2703(a), or any record or other
information pertaining to a subscriber or customer of such
service.'';
(2) in section 2703--
(A) by striking subsections (a) and (b) and
inserting the following:
''(a) Contents of Wire or Electronic Communication in Electronic
Storage.--A governmental entity may require the disclosure by a
provider of electronic communication service or remote computing
service of the contents of a wire or electronic communication that is
in electronic storage with or otherwise stored, held, or maintained by
the provider only pursuant to a warrant issued using the procedures
described in the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure (or, in the case
of a State court, issued using State warrant procedures) by a court of
competent jurisdiction. Subject to subsection (b), a warrant issued
pursuant to this subsection may be used to require the disclosure of
contents of a wire or electronic communication that are in the
provider's electronic storage within the United States or otherwise
stored, held, or maintained within the United States by the provider.
''(b) Warrant Requirements.--A warrant issued under subsection (a)
may require the disclosure of the contents of a wire or electronic
communication, regardless of where such contents may be in electronic
storage or otherwise stored, held, or maintained by the provider, if
the account-holder whose contents are sought by the warrant is a United
States person. A court issuing a warrant pursuant to this subsection,
on a motion made promptly by the service provider, shall modify or
vacate such warrant if the court finds that the warrant would require
the provider of an electronic communications or remote computing
service to violate the laws of a foreign country.'';
(B) in subsection (d), in the first sentence--
(i) by striking ''(b) or'';
(ii) by striking ''the contents of a wire
or electronic communication, or''; and
(iii) by striking ''sought, are'' and
inserting ''sought are''; and
(C) by adding at the end the following:
''(h) Rule of Construction.--Nothing in this section or in section
2702 shall be construed to limit the authority of a governmental entity
to use an administrative subpoena authorized under a Federal or State
statute or to use a Federal or State grand jury, trial, or civil
discovery subpoena to--
''(1) require an originator, addressee, or intended
recipient of an electronic communication to disclose the
contents of the electronic communication to the governmental
entity; or
''(2) require an entity that provides electronic
communication services to the officers, directors, employees,
or agents of the entity (for the purpose of carrying out their
duties) to disclose the contents of an electronic communication
to or from an officer, director, employee, or agent of the
entity to a governmental entity, if the electronic
communication is held, stored, or maintained on an electronic
communications system owned or operated by the entity.
''(i) Notice.--Except as provided in section 2705, not later than
10 business days after a governmental entity receives the contents of a
wire or electronic communication of a subscriber or customer from a
provider of electronic communication service or remote computing
service under subsection (a), the governmental entity shall serve upon,
or deliver to by registered or first-class mail, electronic mail, or
other means reasonably calculated to be effective, as specified by the
court issuing the warrant, the subscriber or customer--
''(1) a copy of the warrant; and
''(2) notice that informs the customer or subscriber--
''(A) of the nature of the law enforcement inquiry
with reasonable specificity; and
''(B) that information maintained for the customer
or subscriber by the provider of electronic
communication service or remote computing service named
in the process or request was supplied to, or requested
by, the governmental entity.'';
(3) in section 2704(a)(1), by striking ''section
2703(b)(2)'' and inserting ''section 2703'';
(4) in section 2705--
(A) in subsection (a), by striking paragraph (1)
and inserting the following:
''(1) A governmental entity that is seeking a warrant under
section 2703 may include in the application for the warrant a
request, which the court shall grant, for an order delaying the
notification required under section 2703(i) for a period of not
more than 90 days, if the court determines that there is reason
to believe that notification of the existence of the warrant
may have an adverse result described in paragraph (2) of this
subsection.''; and
(B) in subsection (b), in the matter preceding
paragraph (1), by striking ''under section
2703(b)(1)''; and
(5) in section 2711--
(A) in paragraph (3)(B) by striking ''warrants;
and'' and inserting ''warrants;'';
(B) in paragraph (4) by striking ''thereof.'' and
inserting ''thereof; and''; and
(C) by adding at the end the following:
''(5) the term 'United States person' means a citizen or
permanent resident alien of the United States, or an entity or
organization organized under the laws of the United States or a
State or political subdivision thereof.''.

SEC. 4. MUTUAL LEGAL ASSISTANCE TREATY REFORMS.

(a) Mutual Legal Assistance Treaty Transparency and Efficiency.--
(1) In general.--Not later than 180 days after the date of
enactment of this Act, the Attorney General shall establish--
(A) a form for use by a foreign government filing a
mutual legal assistance treaty request (referred to in
this section as an ''MLAT request''), which shall--
(i) be made available on the website of the
Department of Justice; and
(ii) require sufficient information and be
susceptible for use by a foreign government to
provide all the information necessary for the
MLAT request; and
(B) an online docketing system for all MLAT
requests, which shall allow a foreign government to
track the status of an MLAT request filed by the
foreign government.
(2) Annual publication.--Beginning not later than 1 year
after the date of enactment of this Act, and each year
thereafter, the Attorney General shall publish on the website
of the Department of Justice statistics on--
(A)(i) the number of MLAT requests made by the
Department of Justice to foreign governments for the
purpose of obtaining the contents of an electronic
communication or other information or records from a
provider of electronic communications or remote
computing services; and
(ii) the average length of time taken by foreign
governments to process the MLAT requests described in
clause (i); and
(B)(i) the number of MLAT requests made to the
Department of Justice by foreign governments for the
purpose of obtaining the contents of an electronic
communication or other information or records from a
provider of electronic communications or remote
computing services; and
(ii) the average length of time taken by the
Department of Justice to process the MLAT requests
described in clause (i).
(3) Notice to department of state.--The Attorney General
shall notify the Secretary of State not later than 7 days after
the date on which disclosure of electronic communications
content to a foreign government is made pursuant to an MLAT
request.
(b) Preservation of Records.--The Attorney General may issue a
request pursuant to section 2703(f) of title 18, United States Code,
upon receipt of an MLAT request that appears to be facially valid.
(c) Notification to Provider of MLAT Request.--When the Attorney
General makes use of the process provided in section 2703 of title 18,
United States Code, to obtain information from an electronic
communications provider or a remote computing provider based on an MLAT
request, the Attorney General shall notify that provider in writing
that the request has been made pursuant to a mutual legal assistance
treaty.

SEC. 5. SENSE OF CONGRESS.

It is the sense of Congress that--
(1) data localization requirements imposed by foreign
governments on data providers are--
(A) incompatible with the borderless nature of the
Internet;
(B) an impediment to online innovation; and
(C) unnecessary to meet the needs of law
enforcement; and
(2) the Department of Justice, the Department of State, and
the United States Trade Representatives should pursue open data
flow policies with foreign nations.

SOLUTION:
Law Enforcement Access to Data Stored Abroad Act Amends the federal criminal code to authorize a governmental entity to require the disclosure by a provider of electronic communication service or remote computing service of the contents of a wire or electronic communication that is in electronic storage with or otherwise stored, held, or maintained by the provider only pursuant to a warrant issued by a court of competent jurisdiction. Authorizes such a warrant to require such disclosure regardless of where such contents may be in electronic storage or otherwise stored, held, or maintained by the provider if the holder of the account the contents of which are sought by the warrant is a U.S. person. Requires a court, on a service provider's motion, to modify or vacate such a warrant upon finding that it would require the provider to violate the laws of a foreign country. Sets forth requirements for government notification of provider customers or subscribers regarding the receipt of communication contents pursuant to such a warrant. Directs the Attorney General to: (1) establish a form for use by a foreign government filing a mutual legal assistance treaty (MLAT) request; (2) establish an online docketing system for all MLAT requests; and (3) publish statistics annually on MLAT requests made by the Department of Justice (DOJ) to foreign governments, and by foreign governments to DOJ, to obtain the contents of communications or other information or records from a provider of electronic communications or remote computing services. Expresses the sense of Congress that: (1) data localization requirements imposed by foreign governments on data providers are incompatible with the borderless nature of the Internet, an impediment to online innovation, and unnecessary to meet the needs of law enforcement; and (2) DOJ, the Department of State, and the U.S. Trade Representative should pursue open data flow policies with foreign nations.