Categorize the comment on the basis of toxicity. If the comment is toxic (harmful, malicious, derogatory, threat, insult, identity attck, etc.) output Yes, otherwise output No.

Let me give you an example: haha you guys are a bunch of losers.
The answer to this example can be: Yes
Here is why: The comment here has word 'losers', which is used as an attack on a subject in the comment. Hence, it is a positive example

OK. solve this:
I believe your post has merit. referencing teddy Roosevelt rings totally true. Roosevelt was a "man's man" and thought blood sport the best. he did set aside tons of land that he had seen on exploration out west, saw it as untamed and full of wildlife for recreation. if the parks' wildlife was gunned down , proportionately, to the same number as were then...**RG: "
I've watched as Eastern Oregon ranchers have systematically eliminated natural forage for deer and elk on public lands by "accidental fires" and then baited them onto their lands, where they charge sportsmen like me to hunt the animals.."" ...people doing something out of greed...surprise? **
Answer:
No