IN: The 2001 results of Natural Gas Marketer Customer Satisfaction by Mastio & Company. Mastio & Company's Vice President, Bart Thedinger recently appeared on Williams Energy News Live to discuss the results of Mastio's most recent report on Natural Gas Marketer Customer Satisfaction. Which gas marketers excel in customer service? Click here (www.mastio.com/press/mk5video.html) to discover the results of what key decision makers who purchase nearly 90% of the natural gas sold in North America think. "Customer Satisfaction Matters with Winning Companies"

Generate a subject line.

OUT: Williams Energy News Live Interview on Mastio's Natural Gas Marketer Customer Satisfaction Study
IN: This is an email
Just so you know, I spoke with the group this morning about contracting practices and they agreed to do the Christine/Susan/dealmaker huddle prior to sending any contracts out. It helps that I have Kevin's support on this. I think it will work fine. TK is going make sure Tenaska gets credited. The difference between actual and billed amounts is very little. Thanks for your attention to this last week.

What is the subject?

OUT: Tenaska
QUESTION: Due to problems with a Mirant downstream, I had to change a couple of paths late Monday. The new and improved paths are: LADWP-CISO(T)LDWP/SYL GF-LDWP(T)SYL/MALIN #LDWP00000178F-LA(T)SYL/MALIN LDWPCA0024-LADWP-MORGAN-BPA(T)MALIN/JD #10031F-BPA(T)JD/PGE #10031NF-MORGAN-AEP-EPMI-CAES-PGE. Deal numbers 630912 and 556517. IPCO-IPCO(T)IPCO/LGBP #79606F-IPCO-EPMI-MIRANT-SNOH-BPA(T)LGBP/JD #96092NF-SNOH-MIRANT-BPA(T)JD/MALIN #371697F-CISO(T)MALIN/NP15-MIRANT. Deal numbers 524174 and 626428. Both for 25mw on Light-load for 06/05. I have made a tag, #24026, for the LA to PGE path. It was made as a preschedule tag, but due to the lateness of it, BPA may deny it just because they can. If that happens, EPMI real-time will have to make a real-time tag. You can use my tag as a template. Late breaking news - my tag went undelivered due to communication failure at PGE, so I faxed the tag to all the counterparties. Mirant has made tag #5673 for the IPCO to NP15 path. All counterparties have been called as of 15:30 and are aware that these schedules are going real-time - that is, their real time groups will call the schedules in to BPA. EPMI real-time will have to make sure this gets done with a reminder phone call to our counterparties. I have spoken with PGE/Donna, AEP/Peggy, Mirant/Emily, and IPCO/Perry. CAES (Conagra) had already gone home for the day and has no real-time. Any questions? Please call. Thanks, Donald Robinson.
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: MIDC path going real-time
The following is a report on the Energy and Natural gas sectors from Credit Suisse First Boston. Please call us at 713-853-2407 if you have any questions. Thanks,
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: Recent report from CS First Boston on Energy and Natural GasCompanies
Susan and Susan: Could someone make sure that you check Marie's chair this week while she is gone for anything that needs to be acted on before she gets back? Thanks. Carol
Answer: Marie Heard's Work
Q: Tim, my understanding is that partnership fee (the $11.0M) has been amortized for the last several years and expensed to the Industrial groups (McConville and Ondarza). As you are aware, I sued them for breach. The settlement involved the elimination of all existing transactions between Ft. James and Enron including the Wauna and Halsey power contracts. It is my understanding that the benefit of the elimination of those shorts resides in the Portland shop. The elimination of the shorts would not have occurred without the lawsuit on the alliance and the settlement I originated. It seemed logical to charge the Portland office with the remaining un-amortized fee of $1.8M as a cost of eliminating the shorts for no cost and no future contingent liability. Lets discuss. Regards
Propose a subject line
A:
Fort James Amortization