input hypothesis: Tofu contains the letter o
Context: Trying Tofu<br>Alicia was feeling a little adventurous. She wanted to try Tofu. She had never had it before. So she took a small bite. To her delight it was delicious.
OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No
true or false: Yes
Context:
A variety of devices could be powered selectively from a single-power source carried on the body via multiple power supply signals at different frequencies, according to the patent abstract.
Hypothesis: People in Zimbabwe will be making use of this device at some point in our lifetime. OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No
It's impossible to say
Input: OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No

"This letter is in regard to the comments made by Beth Eveland from York Township in the June York Sunday News. I assure you that the Dover Area School Board is not going against its mission statement. In fact, if you read the statement, it says to educate our students so that they can be contributing members of society.

Sentence: Beth Eveland made no comments.

Output: No
Problem:
Read the following paragraph and determine if the hypothesis is true:

College Wrestling<br>Sam was too small for his college wrestling team. His coach gave him a few months to bulk up. Sam tried different things but it didn't work. Sam wasn't able to gain enough mass. He was not allowed on the team.

OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No
Hypothesis: Sam saw the wrestling team nutritionist for help.
****
Answer:
It's impossible to say
[Q]: And we start -- we don't do it exclusively -- but we start by rolling back George Bush's unaffordable tax cut for the wealthiest people, people earning more than $200,000 a year, and we pass, hopefully, the McCain-Kerry Commission which identified some $60 billion that we can get. They want to roll back the first George H. W. Bush's unaffordable tax cut. OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No
[A]: It's impossible to say
[Q]: Well, I'm aware that that statement was modified several times. In fact, there were different drafts of that statement that I had seen. The exact modification, are you telling me that from the time that they had approved it in October, it was modified before it was read in January? Because it was again read in, I believe, like May, and there was a change from that point in time, unless I'm incorrect and that is the change that I'm thinking of. The statement will be changed again in 2022 OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No
[A]:
It's impossible to say