In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.

[EX Q]: Comment: Try to stay calm. I cannot understand why young people now a days do such stupid things. Not grasping how their actions can destroy their futures and hurt so many and the pain it causes those who are family and love them.
[EX A]: Non-threat

[EX Q]: Comment: First, any Breitbart article should be deemed suspect. Second, the author clearly misunderstood what Francis was saying. He was not saying that there are no Muslim terrorists, he was saying that there is no such thing as "Muslim terrorism", any more than there is "Christian terrorism".
[EX A]: Non-threat

[EX Q]: Comment: Your description of Wheeler's response as "coy" is dishonest & misleading: it was straight-forward & honest. He's not going to take a stand on something he sees as divisive & points to work being done at the Leg as a better course. It's fine for voters to disagree with that, but setting it up with an unnecessary adjective is editorializing, not reporting.

Plus you take a single response to a single question, an incomplete response for that matter, and you do not put it into the context of anything else he's said. That's not just misleading; it's poor journalism. (And let's not even get into how bad the headline is.)
[EX A]:
Non-threat