Question:
Based on the premise "'You would have called them the Southern states,' Greuze explained.", can we conclude that "Greuze did not call them the southern states."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
no

Question: Sentence A: uh reading about and and i suppose that there is uh justification for taking everybody if you take anybody

Sentence B: I guess there is a reason to take everyone.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Question: Poland's road to capitalism and democracy has been a complicated one.
It has not been simple for Poland to become a democracy.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Problem: Here is a premise:
In the face of this opposition, Republicans played the molester card.

Here is a hypothesis:
The Republicans did not respond to the opposition.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Sentence 1: Every Sunday he watches three games at once.

Sentence 2: He watches one game after the other on Sunday.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: no

Premise:
"Additionally, there are other technologies under development that potentially could reduce activated carbon demand from what is estimated here."
Hypothesis: There are other technologies under development that could reduce carbon demand even further.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
yes