Q: Richard: This is a first for me. I received the following objection to our standard arbitration language: "The arbitration does not provide for expedited procedures with limited discovery and limited live testimony. This could take as long as in court and cost more." Is this a valid objection? If so, how should we amend our language? Or should we be silent as to jurisdicition without waiving any objections (venue, forum) and waive jury trial? I look forward to hearing from you. Thanks.
Propose a subject line
A: ENA arbitration language

Q: My paycheck doesn't seem to be anywhere around here. Could you let me know if my name was on the list of missing paychecks for the end of last month? Kathy Axford said she gave you such a list on 12/30. Thanks,
Propose a subject line
A: 12/31 Paycheck

Q: The graphs I've set on your desks are the product of a new version of the EOL Report. Please look them over briefly and determine whether or not the data this report pulled in is correct. I've attached a table of the data as well for another point of reference. If there are problems or discrepancies in the report, please let me know as soon as possible, and we'll adjust it accordingly. Thanks,
Propose a subject line
A: Daily EOL Summary 1/4

Q: Stuart, If you need a copy of the executed Westinghouse letter, you can find the original on my desk, I believe on the left hand corner (looking out). The letter we are waiting for is merely an acknowledgement that LJM doesn't need to sign. I think getting the letter is probably belts and suspenders, but I requested it anyway. Kay
Propose a subject line
A:
SW letter