In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Ex Input:
Comment: @JeanTam, you are very fortunate. Since moving here almost two years ago from Chgo, we have experienced a "don't care!" attitude when it comes to trucks of any size. (Chicagoans can be terrible drivers!) I'd like to call attention motorcyclists on crotch rockets who blow between cars on Seward Hwy asking for a funeral. It's not funny. You want us to start seeing motorcycles, don't drive like an idiot. Now back to your regularly scheduled program.

Ex Output:
Non-sexual-explicit

Ex Input:
Comment: This was intended to have been positioned below "Sylvia's" comment (7 above) that there is no "but masturbation".

Not sure what you mean by "but masturbation".....But, ewwwww.

Ex Output:
Sexual-explicit

Ex Input:
Comment: The problem is that young voters don't follow the news.... they just react en masse to the latest tweet - either positively or negatively. Blind unthinking responses. So all that will matter is whether the Trudeau govt will enable them to get stoned. Don't expect them to remember all these egregious stumbles. That's the job of the opposition come election time and they must step up.
I would also expect the media to do a regular audit on govt performance.

Ex Output:
Non-sexual-explicit