[QUESTION] Given the sentence "Man waterskiing in the blue ocean." is it true that "A man is waterskiing."?
Man waterskiing is a non descriptive way of describing a man waterskiing on the ocean.
The answer is yes.

Q: Given the sentence "A man with a red hat and a long-sleeve shirt on is playing the drums." can we conclude that "The man is hatless."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A: The man cannot be hatless if he has a red hat.
The answer is no.

QUESTION: Can we conclude from "Pedestrians walking past a 50% off sale." that "A group of men ice fishing."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell

Let's solve it slowly: One does not find a sale while one is ice fishing.
The answer is no.

[QUESTION] Premise: "Women's volleyball team huddled in celebration."
Hypothesis: "A team of volleyball players watching tv."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A volleyball team does not have to be women. If women are in celebration they are not watching TV.
The answer is no.

Q: Given the sentence "3 gentleman look at a bike that's turned upside down." can we conclude that "The men are mafia."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A: We have know other knowledge of the people in the first sentence other than they are men. We don't know any affiliations or allegiances they might have or be apart of. All we know is they are gentlemen. We also know know the motive behind them looking at the bike is malicious in nature. We just know they are looking at a bike turned upside down. Maybe it got in an accident on its own or is being repaired.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

[QUESTION] Premise: "Two kids are doing karate or some type of martial arts."
Hypothesis: "The two girls are doing karate."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Two kids doing karate do not necessarily imply that they are girls.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.