Given an Amazon review, indicate whether it is a 'Positive Review' or 'Negative Review'.

Q: everything I hoped for.

A: Positive Review
****
Q: I bought this product some days ago, and I made some tests on it, and it works fast, I copied a 1.1gb file in 1'51\" (one minute and fifty one seconds)..<br />You can see a test pic I took..<br />The black color is excellent, very elegant..

A: Positive Review
****
Q: [[VIDEOID:mo2QLSSRZ5UPYM6]]quickly: thank you to all that review products with great experience points that help refine everyone's needs...and also provides feedback to the manufacturer for product improvement...that's what I call a free market and why I'm writing this review:<br /><br />Anyway, Greatsheild's product is the 2nd screen protector I've bought for my Samsung Series 7 Slate; so I now have context within which to review.<br /><br />I use the slate for medical school...meaning I ink with the wiacom pen a ton. I mean a ton, and I use MS OneNote exclusively for school, and have literally 0, zero, paper notes for my classes...to give you an idea.<br /><br />The first screen protector I bought was MXH Photodon's (HD) screen protector. This cost $19 for 1 sheet. It was good.<br />I now have the Greatsheild (matte) protector, which costs $13 for 3 sheets. Also good.<br /><br />So what's the differences?<br /><br />(1) APPLICATION/INSTALLITION:<br />Both excellent, really easy, fit basically perfect, and easily reversible without leaving any residue what so ever incase some spec of dust got stuck under the film. Only minor caveat is both products have a \"sticky\" underside, so you have to be careful dirt doesn't get stuck to it while installing. Just annoying to clean, nothing permanent, and by \"sticky\" I don't mean like a glue its more of a texture.<br /><br />(2) REFLECTIVENESS:<br />Highly important to me because its very annoying trying to study under the white fluorescence lights in the library...especially since I use the slate much like a notebook lying relatively flat on the table as oppose to an upright monitor. The MXH sheet was without a doubt noticeably more reflective (obviously not as much as the naked native glass (which is insane). I would say the MXH Photodon cut down the reflectiveness ~40-60%). The GreatSheild is far better in this respect. The \"matte\" description is spot on. Reflections are way more blurred out and less intense (I would say itcuts it down around 75-85%). Can't eliminate it completely, but with the GreatSheild I am able to read through the reflection, which is impossible with the native glass, and difficult with the MXH Photodon.<br /><br />(3) CLEARITY:<br />in my opinion the MXH Photodon film was slightly (emphasis on slightly) more clear. Both films seemed to change the way the image from the native screen looks at first, but after a few hours or days its not noticeable nor an issue. Over all the clarity \"difference\" is only noticeable when looking at tiny font (i.e. Calibri font, size 8 or less) from a distance of more than 4 or 5 feet away from the slate...so not really a big deal for my purposes, and I can't really think of a situation it would be an issue unless you have really long arms (perhaps with the newer tablets running 1920x1080 resolution vs. my older model Slate that runs 1366X768). Nevertheless, the MXH Photodon does have a small edge on clarity...which is probably why they advertise as an \"HD, Anti-glare\" screen protector.<br /><br />(4) FEEL TO TOUCH: the MXH Photodon felt a little harder with a more hard-plastic-ish feel, while the GreatSheild feels much softer like a piece of paper; in fact it feels exactly like my desktop PC's matte LCD monitor. For example, when I move my finger across the screen I hear a noise very similar to the sound I make moving my finger across a sheet of paper. In a way it gives a paper-like feel when inking on the slate.<br /><br />(5) FEEL TO INK WITH THE PEN: There is a difference here. Its not a giant difference, but consistently noticeable and will depend on individual preference. The MXH Photodon is more slick, while the GreatSheild holds more resistance while in writing. I personally like this, makes it more like writing on paper. A good way to put it in perspective is: the native gorilla glass of the Slate is the most slick for inking with the pen. This would lead in a more messy script on my part, and thus a higher error rate & processing time with the text recognition in Windows 8. The GreatSheild would be like the opposite end of the spectrum; not to say its perfect, inking is still more slick that an actually pen/pencil and paper. The MXH Photodon in somewhere in the middle (I would say a little bit closer to the GreatSheild end than the native glass end).<br /><br />(6) SCRATCH RESISTANCE:<br />So, the reason I went with a different choice this time around (other than cost as a student) was because the MXH Photodon accumulated scratches from inking with the pen. The scratches would not happen every time I would ink, just on occasion as I would be writing or drawing I'd hit a \"rough\" stroke, such that a minor scratch would be left on the film. A single scratch was not noticeable to the eye (unless you looked really really close at the screen) but I could definitely feel it in my hand when it would happen.<br /><br />It's hard to say why this would happen. It's never happened on the native gorilla glass. It may be because the tip of the wiacom pen that comes with the Slate is not a perfect dome if you look close. It's more like tapered cylinder that does a sharp cone towards the tip, then the absolute tip is smoothed out.<br />looks kind of like this:<br /><br />_tip of the dome<br />/.\<br />| |^the sharp edge<br />| |<br /><br />Anyway, while 1 scratch was not noticeable, after a full 9 months of using the MXH Photodon (i.e. the entire 1st year of medical school = ~5000 pages of notes) the middle portion of the screen where I (apparently) do most of my writing had accumulated so many scratches that the content behind it became noticeably blurry to the point that I had to zoom in to continue reading. At first I though I was starting to need glasses, then one day I realized the text at the top and bottom of the screen was clear and I didn't need glasses. I first noticed this about a 1-1.5 months ago, and removed the screen protector for my last exam cause it was too annoying. Nobody expectsthese protectors to last forever, and the MXH Photodon lasting 7-8 months with the intense use I put into it was still great value.<br /><br />Now, I can't give an honest comment about the scratch resistance for the GreatSheild since I've only been using it for ~2 weeks. If I can edit this review after my next set of exams in a month I will. My suspicion is that the issue will persist given the GreatSheild feels softer and is likely made of a less resistant plastic...Then again...I haven't had a single scratch yet...and maybe the texture of the GreatSheild is such that it won't scratch with the wiacom pen...only time and studying will tell :)<br /><br />Hope this helps, lol, best wishes.<br /><br />UPDATE:<br />Now that I've used the Greatsheild for sometime... just wanted to add that: YES The Greatsheild will also accumulate scratches; there are a couple on the screen protector now. However I still maintain the \"inking\" is better, with more resistance meaning less messy script and lower error rate. However, the reduction in image quality is still apparently as well, particularly when viewing the screen corners from an angle (Not that big a deal).

A:
Positive Review
****