QUESTION: Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "Two men doing construction work."
Hypothesis: "Two guys work construction."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell

Let's solve it slowly: Two guys who work construction is a rephrasing of two men doing construction work.
The answer is yes.

[QUESTION] Can we conclude from "A room full of people dining at round tables." that "The large group is eating."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
There is a large group because the room is full of people.
The answer is yes.

Q: Premise: "Four people are walking along a city sidewalk."
Hypothesis: "While the one in the green hat talks on a cellphone."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
A: A businessman is plotting to leave his submarine in the fall.
The answer is no.

QUESTION: Given the sentence "Three men sitting around a fire in front of a cabin." is it true that "Men sit around a fire."?

Let's solve it slowly: Men are sitting around a fire to make them warm in the winter.
The answer is yes.

[QUESTION] Premise: "A bald man is covered in sawdust."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A bald man is working with a saw." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
The man doesn't need to be working with a saw in order to be covered in sawdust.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

Q: Premise: "A snowboarder slides down the side of an a-frame house buried in snow."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A snowboarder goes down a house." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A:
If a snowboarder slides down a house they could also be described as going down the house.
The answer is yes.