Q: Thanks for the tip last night! I called and ragged around my thieving ins. company this morning and they are going to cough up some serious insurance for me and Sandra at suuper-cheap pre XXX prices. Cool. My only concern at this point is that my over-insured status may create undesirable incentives for the little ladies in my life (the dreaded "worth more dead than alive syndrome"!) Adios amigo! DF
Propose a subject line
A: Insurance
IN: Attached is a revised, red-lined version of the extension letter. I believe that I addressed Keith's question to his satisfaction, so I haven't added the additional language that he suggested regarding the timing of the removal of the existing compressor units at Stations 1, 2 and 3. Please let me know if you have any additional comments. Thanks.

Generate a subject line.

OUT: Transwestern Red Rock Expansion- FERC Extension Letter
IN: This is an email
This request from Shari is fine with me. Could I also request a flat screen for my new office? Thanks for your help. Let me know what else I need to do.

What is the subject?

OUT: Flat Screen Monitor
QUESTION: Patti will send you on Monday a draft of a memo regarding publishing the DPR during the holidays. Please review it and make sure that the commitments we are making can be met by London. Let me know if anything needs to be changed or if there is further clarification needed in the notes, keeping in mind that with the audience on the memo that I want it to be short and easy. Your comments/suggestions are welcomed and needed before I send this out later next week. Thanks. --sally
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: DPR Holiday Schedule
Not surprisingly, the organization is moving faster than Rick Buy's vacation schedule. Our meeting is set with Mark Frevert, Rick Buy, you and me on August 28 -- two weeks from next Monday, dictated by Rick Buy's schedule. I
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: Meeting with Mark Frevert - Should We Move It Up?
market_relations@nyiso.com writes to the NYISO_TECH_EXCHANGE Discussion List: Dear Market Participants: On the November 1999 & December 1999 Transmission Customer Monthly Statements many customers have noted under the "Energy Settlement" section for "Forward Energy" a change in MW-Hrs with no associated change in dollar amounts. This is because of a correction in the sign convention for the MW-Hrs related to external generation transactions (transactions from a proxy bus to the NYISO reference bus). For all other types of transactions the NYISO charges customers the appropriate TUC or LBMP based on the MWs that flowed, but for external generation transactions, customers receive payments from the NYISO, and therefore these types of transactions have an opposite sign convention. The dollars associated with the external generation transactions have always had the proper sign convention, but the MW-Hrs have not. On 01/17/2000 this sign convention was corrected for all billing months going forward resulting in the correct MW-Hr values being reported from February 2000 to date. However, November 1999 - January 2000 did not have the proper MW-Hrs reported on the Transmission Customer Monthly Statements. With the latest settlement adjustments posted the MW-Hrs are being corrected with the proper sign convention. Transmission Customers will see similar changes in their forward energy MW-Hrs for January 2000's settlement adjustment.
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer:
November & December 1999 Settlement Adjustments