In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.
--------
Question: Comment: *arse

Answer: Sexual-explicit

Question: Comment: I agree with Teresa Shook, who says, "Politics has no business basing decisions on religion covertly or overtly." I also agree that the legislators who failed to support this bill are "cowards," lacking the courage to do the right thing and caving in to the loud minority who would force their religious beliefs on the majority.

Answer: Non-sexual-explicit

Question: Comment: This is one of the all time great comedy articles and comments/posts on the G&M. Not a single person, including the author, has any first, or even second hand knowledge of what really happened.

The Russian government has it's own self serving version of what happened. Bill Browder is a proven liar and con man, with a political agenda to push and his own dirty tracks to cover. I am certain he has his own reasons for not wanting to come to Canada/US, since he will again be deposed in several active lawsuits against him. Why does he never want the truth to come out in sworn testimony court?

Answer:
Non-sexual-explicit