instruction:
In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.
question:
Comment: I would like to pay for you to get this entire comment tattooed on your flesh, so you can revisit it year after year and come to understand the full depth of your ignorance.
answer:
Non-obscene

question:
Comment: The authors of the JJ report insist that homosexuality played no role in the abuse crisis, but their own data undermine this conclusion. For example, they plainly admit that "81% of the victims [between 1950 and 2002] were male," and that 78% were post-pubescent.

So if the abusers weren't pedophiles, and the victims were mostly adolescent males, wouldn't that make the victimizers homosexuals?

What else could we possibly be talking about if not homosexuality?

Why can't you answer this question?
answer:
Non-obscene

question:
Comment: Republicans have talked shiat and demonized ol' Hitlary for decades. They've oversaturated the market and pushed the bounds of sanity.

I think Clinton is a terrible candidate. I also think Republicans have cried wolf on her so many times that most reasonable Americans assume that whatever they're selling is just more sour-grapes bullshiat to be taken with a grain of salt.
answer:
Obscene