input question: He was--and, weirdly enough, still is--writing principally as a Nixon apologist aiming to trivialize Watergate itself. If this premise is true, does that tell us:"He thinks Nixon was not guilty."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: it is not possible to tell

Question:
Based on the premise "White House counsel argues 1) Courts have consistently recognized that the attorney-client privilege applies to conversations between government officials and government lawyers . 2) Even Starr concedes that Hillary Clinton should be treated as a government official.", can we conclude that "Starr says Clinton should be treated like a government employee."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
yes

Question: Sentence A: But the council had allowed it.

Sentence B: The council allowed it, under threat of further violence.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question: And I'm sure it looked wonderfully natural at a distance.
It didn't have one bit of anything resembling the original.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Problem: Here is a premise:
This colonnaded square, built during the second century a.d. , was once the city's bustling marketplace.

Here is a hypothesis:
The square was built during the sixteenth century.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question:
Commerce has always been an effective bridge of cultural barriers.

Does it follow that "A good way to overcome cultural differences has always been the trade of goods."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
yes