We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control) into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[Q]: Sent1: Whenever government mean to invade the rights and liberties of the people, they always attempt to destroy the militia, in order to raise an army upon their ruins.
Sent2: The fact that governments around the world have killed their own citizens after disarming them does not mean that they should not be armed, it means that the citizens should not be disarmed.
[A]: Not similar

[Q]: Sent1: In other words the Miller case interpreted the Second Amendment to mean one has the right to own militia type weapons.
Sent2: In the Miller case, the court essentially ruled that the second ammendment does indeed convey an individual right, but that the right in question is dependant on the type of weapon (i.e must be suitable for military use).
[A]: Similar

[Q]: Sent1: Gun haters if the 2nd amend did not protect the right to bear arms then all guns in America would be banned.
Sent2: I've been told by gun activists that the second amendment protects a limited right and therefore people can be banned from owning WMD's.
[A]:
Not similar