In this task, you're given a statement, and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence clearly disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3' corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.
--------
Question: Statement: The scenario A reference case assumes a business-as-usual characterization of technology development and deployment. Choices: 1. This assumption is necessary in order to create a realistic model. 2. No assumptions were made for scenario A reference case. 3. A business-as-usual assumption is made for scenario A reference case.

Answer: 2

Question: Statement: They wallow in anti-government rhetoric as if Oklahoma City had never been bombed, but make no assault on the federal leviathan. Choices: 1. Oklahoma City was bombed. 2. Oklahoma City had never been bombed. 3. Some entities use the bombing as rhetoric to support federal policies.

Answer: 2

Question: Statement: I saw at once by his face that something disturbing had occurred. Choices: 1. I could read from his face that something bad had happened. 2. I could tell by looking at his face that he had some good news. 3. His face showed that he was in shock from what had happened.

Answer:
2