Premise:
"really so uh does your husband ever use uh a laptop or a notebook does he bring a little one home with him or"
Hypothesis: Using a notebook would be better for your husband.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

it is not possible to tell

input question: Most programs are forced to limit the cases they accept to emergencies or other situations that threaten the safety and stability of the family or individual involved. If this premise is true, does that tell us:"Programs have to make these limits largely due to a lack of resources and institutional support."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: it is not possible to tell

Question:
Based on the premise "The first time was the worst.", can we conclude that "It couldn't have been worse than the first time."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
it is not possible to tell

Question: Sentence A: The upper reaches of the Bosphorus are lined with picturesque fishing villages Tarabya, Sar??yer, and Rumeli Kava ?? where you can enjoy a meal at one of the many excellent seafood restaurants.

Sentence B: Many more excellent restaurants open year on year.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question: Combining statistical sampling with fast pay procedures increases the risks that overpayments would occur and go undetected compared to a 100percent verification of receipt and acceptance.
The likelihood of undetected overpayments due to fast pay procedures is increased when statistical sampling is added.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Problem: Here is a premise:
no uh i've been drug tested twice at TI and it doesn't bother me uh

Here is a hypothesis:
I've never been tested for drugs at TI before.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer:
no