Sentence 1: approximately um-hum um-hum we live on a used to be a farm but we don't farm much we uh but we do have a garden

Sentence 2: Oh, we don't actually live in that farm, mostly because there isn't enough space for a garden.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: no

Question:
She was either terribly ignorant about economic affairs or terribly foresighted.

Does it follow that "We thought it was better for her to be terribly foresighted than ignorant."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
it is not possible to tell

Q: If It's no wonder that Robert McKee, the spiritual father of something like Rounders , reserves a special place in hell for Welles and Citizen Kane , in which the exhibitionistic auteur incessantly upstages his own narrative., can we say that "Robert McKee professed his admiration of Citizen Kane."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A: no

Premise:
"okay you said you're Judy"
Hypothesis: You said you are John.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

no

input question: It's full of keen insights and dazzling supplementary photos showing many of the shoes at work. If this premise is true, does that tell us:"This is the first legitimate source of information on this topic."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: it is not possible to tell

Q: If Their stories are the city's ongoing miracles and the source of Jerusalem's hope., can we say that "Their stories have had no impact on Jerusalem's hope."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A:
no