Question:
Based on the premise "Keep in mind the requirement that a subclass has to generate revenue to cover its costs.", can we conclude that "Subclasses are all exempt from paying off their initial costs."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
no

Question: Sentence A: incorporated it into the final rule in what appears to be a clear and unambiguous manner.

Sentence B: It is incorporated to address comments made about the rule.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question: There was little evidence of religion or of the rule of law.
The was lots of religion there.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Problem: Here is a premise:
To the south of the palace are the green landscapes of Holyrood Park, including the volcanic peak known as Arthur's Seat.

Here is a hypothesis:
The palace has green landscapes called Holyrood Park.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Sentence 1: I signed up a truck from Friday until Monday two weeks hence, K. explains.

Sentence 2: He signed up the truck to take it camping.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Premise:
"Some pursued strategic planning initiatives."
Hypothesis: Some of them practiced strategic planning proposals.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
yes