In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.

Q: Comment: First, any Breitbart article should be deemed suspect. Second, the author clearly misunderstood what Francis was saying. He was not saying that there are no Muslim terrorists, he was saying that there is no such thing as "Muslim terrorism", any more than there is "Christian terrorism".

A: Non-threat
****
Q: Comment: You are free to try and talk him down. Just know that if you are wrong you will suffer massive injury or death. You might want to sell tickets to the show though because you are going to need them for your medical bills if you try it.

A: Threat
****
Q: Comment: Don't be silly. There are government regulations covering every aspect of our lives, including who can drive, what, and how.

Either the government can forbid all such outsize monster vehicles altogether, or it can ensure only those who actually need them can have them. Which do you prefer?

A:
Non-threat
****