Q: Per our conference call today, here are some ideas to get TW Settlement Value. 1. SoCal to commit to TW to let us schedule transport at the SoCal/Topock (South Needles) delivery point. 2. SoCal to turnback 20,000 to 25,000/d of receipt capacity from the WTX Pool, at no cost to TW (SoCal continues to pay for it). 3. TW has been scheduling PG&E's payback to SoCal at SoCal/Topock to help PG&E and SoCal. SoCal to schedule this as transport from PG&E/Topock (as a RP) to SoCal/Topock (DP) and pay TW transport fee. 4. SoCal to agree (in writing) to dedicate to TW the incremental 50,000/d at Needles becoming available Jan, 2002 until Red Rock Expansion in-service. 5. SoCal to amend their OBA to dollar-valued (from volumetric) and cash-out their existing OBA with TW (at TW's index value). 6. SoCal to sell storage to TW. 7. SoCal to purchase incremental Thoreau to West of Thoreau capacity from TW. 8. Extension of SoCal's mainline &/or San Juan lateral contracts. Or early notice of termination or early notice of ROFR trigger (so that we would have the opportunity to remarket it).
Propose a subject line
A: SoCal Ideas for Settlement Value
IN: Gentlemen, What's happening with the above deal ? The term is 11/01/01 - 03/31/02, I can see the volume has been changed to 0 - is this only temporarily or has this deal been killed ? We show this deal as Pending and I wanted to remind you that we have never confirmed this transaction. Please advise. Regards,

Generate a subject line.

OUT: Colorado Springs Utilities - Sitara # 889014
IN: This is an email
One of the guys here recieved a call from a guy at EES looking for contacts at gas utilities in the Northwest. They are hoping to sell them some sort of deal where they provide the utility structured products and the utility pushes them through to the endusers... isn't that my Cascade deal? Let's discuss Monday, it sounds like something we need to nip in the bud.

What is the subject?

OUT: EES
QUESTION: Here are details of the problem we're having with the Tagg IQ Reports: Three Mid-Columbia futures trades were executed by Matt Motley, Long Term Southwest Desk, on 2/5, 2/6, and 2/7. Trades pulled into Tagg IQ Reports - All three pull into Future Daily Transaction Report (RSX0245F.IQR) Only two pull into Future Net Position Summary (RXSNSUMF.IQR) All three pull into Tagg Exchange Capture search - transaction IDs are 980362/983837/987050 All three pulled into Tagg Metacalc (Meta ID 77771 - Post ID 1035917 - Post ID 77880 - Post ID 1037269) until 2/9 - NOW GONE Because today is the Nymex Electricity Futures exercise date, we need to know as soon as possible for our calculations whether or not these deals are in the system, and if not, where they went. My confusion lies in the fact that I can find these deals when I do a search in Tagg for any futures deals traded at the Mid-C settlement index, and yet the Risk group can no longer see anything for Mid-C in their calculation. Please let me know what you find. Thank you,
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: Missing Futures Deals
I have enjoyed my years working with all of you. Hopefully, our paths will continue to cross in the future. Since our days may be numbered, below is my personal contact info. Best of luck in the future.
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: Contact Info
I will be working on all RAC bonuses on Wednesday and ask that each of you review your department's bonuses on Thursday so that all of RAC can be submitted on Friday. Thanks. Rick
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer:
RAC Bonuses