QUESTION: Here's a thought that didn't occur to me when I marked up the mock trial script. Should we have the consultants prominantly feature "IPEC Busters"??? Unless we are pretty sure the judge will keep it out on relevance grounds, it might be useful to at least get some juror reactions to it. With or without the specific IPEC Busters stuff, we probably ought to assume that Jad's theme will be that Northern's whole philosophy was to breach contracts without flinching if it served our commercial interests. The vitriol from P&P and the other producers plays into that theme. Maybe we ought to spice that part of the script up a bit also just so we can see how our response plays. DF
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: Mock Trial

QUESTION: Good Afternoon Michelle, Attached you will find the Sample PWD with the few additions we are proposing. It states payment terms and defines our services. Please review and respond with any questions to myself or Dave Smith. Respectfully,
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: Sample PWD

QUESTION: We are considering including the attached provision (or something) similar in our Transaction Confirmations. I would also like to propose it to EEI and WSPP for sample language that could be included on confirms. Would any of you have a problem agreeing to this? If so, what are your concerns? I know you are all real busy right now and appreciate your consideration of this matter. Thanks in advance.
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS:
Attached