Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.

Example Input: Why do universities and colleges need to make voter registration information available? I thought everybody was getting registered with their driver license. Besides, college is too late; most people are old enough to vote before they leave high school.

We also don't need an awareness month for anything. But this legislature has long preferred symbolism over substance in its quest to look like it's doing something.
Example Output: No

Example Input: Once again, the Mayor misses the boat. The now-doomed SW-SAZ plan was cooked up by outsiders ("anybody" was indeed leading the pack) and the residents of the zone were only informed later about what was going to be good for them.

Any plan to upzone (upscale) or change an established neighborhood requires a lot more than a meeting for all and then facilitation by Oregon Consensus. Mediation or facilitation implies that the slate already exists and we're now going to tweak it.

Residents of south Eugene have said no to that process repeatedly (see http://www.swneugene.org). What they have agreed on is plain and simple: a R - E - F - I - N - E - M - E - N - T plan as the platform upon which any future changes can be made. And this plan must be community driven; no more top-down directives.
Example Output: No

Example Input: In my opinion, these charges are based on unfounded accusations and lies. Sad that this can lead to a person getting charged with a crime and having it show up in the paper. Hopefully WW will post again when she is proved innocent.
Example Output:
No