input: CHAPTER XX

VALE LESTON

'The way to make thy son rich is to fill His mind with rest before his trunk with riches; For wealth without contentment climbs a hill, To feel those tempests that fly over ditches, But if thy son can make ten pounds his measure, Then all thou addest may be called his treasure.' GEORGE HERBERT.

'I say, Felix, you've not told me about Vale Leston.'

The two brothers were established under the lee of an old boat, beneath the deep shadow of the red earth cliffs, festooned with ivy, wild clematis, everlasting pea, thrift, and samphire. Not far off, niched beneath the same cliff, were two or three cottage lodging- houses, two-storied, with rough grey slate roofs, glaring white walls, and green shutters to the windows that looked out over the shingly beach to the lazily rippling summer sea.

Ewmouth was a lazy place. Felix had felt half asleep through the earlier days of his stay, and Lance seemed to be lulled into a continual doze whenever he was unoccupied, and that was almost always. It had grieved his elder brother to see this naturally vivacious being so inert and content with inaction, only strolling about a little in early morning and late evening, and languid and weary, if not actually suffering, during the heat and glare of the day. He was now, with his air-pillow and a railway rug, lying on the beach beside Felix, who with his safety inkstand planted in the sand, was at work condensing the parliamentary debates for the Pursuivant, and was glad to perceive that he was so far alive as to be leaning on his elbow, slowly shovelling the sand or smaller pebbles with the frail tenement of a late crab, and it was another good sign to hear his voice in a voluntary inquiry about Vale Leston. 1. what is the chapter name ?
2. what was a lazy place ?
3. who was in a doze ?
4. when did this occur ?
5. how do you make the son rich ?
6. how many pounds to make a measure ?
7. who did not tell them about Vale Leston ?
8. how many brothers was under the lee ?
9. of a lod what ?
10. how many things were festooned ?
11. what was a lazy place ?
12. who was laying on the beach ?
13. how many cottage lodging- houses are there ?
14. were they three-storied ?
15. what were they ?
16. what color were the shutters ?
17. what grieved his elder brother ?
18. what times did he stroll about ?
19. what color were the walls ?
20. what flew over ditches ? Return numbered answers in your output.

output: 1. VALE LESTON
2. Ewmouth
3. Lance
4. the earlier days of his stay
5. fill His mind with rest before his trunk with riches
6. ten
7. Felix
8. two
9. boat
10. One
11. Ewmouth
12. Lance
13. two or three
14. no
15. two-storied
16. green
17. to see this naturally vivacious being so inert and content with inaction,
18. early morning and late evening
19. glaring white
20. tempests

Question: (CNN) -- Oscar Pistorius faced another day of relentless cross-examination Friday as the prosecution challenged his account of the killing of his girlfriend, Reeva Steenkamp.

Prosecutor Gerrie Nel has accused the athlete of hiding the truth about the death of Steenkamp, whom he shot last year through a closed toilet door in his home in Pretoria, South Africa.

His questions again sought to undermine Pistorius' reliability and credibility and to portray the Olympic athlete as someone who was inventing his version of events and "tailoring" evidence to suit his story.

As Nel turned once again to the early hours of Valentine's Day 2013, he repeatedly challenged Pistorius over his actions in the moments leading up to Steenkamp's death.

The prosecution's argument is that Pistorius shot Steenkamp intentionally after a heated argument. Pistorius does not deny shooting her but insists that he mistook her for an intruder.

Pistorius said he thought he heard the toilet door opening before he fired.

"I didn't intend to shoot. My firearm was pointed at the door because that's where I believed that somebody was," he said. "When I heard a noise, I didn't have to think, and I fired -- I fired my weapon. It was an accident."

Nel, known in South African legal circles for his bulldog-like approach to cross-examination, responded to Pistorius' testimony almost with scorn.

"Your version is so improbable that nobody would ever think that it was reasonably, possibly true," he said.

Nel then hammered Pistorius on whether he had known Steenkamp was in the toilet when he fired. 1. Who was being questioned on Friday?
2. by who?
3. Why?
4. What was he hoping to accomplish with his questions?
5. Was Pistorious in a sport?
6. Who was the girlfriend?
7. How was she killed?
8. Where was he when he shot her?
9. did he intend to?
10. then why did he?
11. does he claim it was an accident?
12. what did he hear before he shot?
13. what kind?
14. was it the noise of the toilet door?
15. What kind of approach is the prosecutor known for?
16. Where?
17. what does he use that approach on?
18. How did he respond to the testimony?
19. why doesn't he think that anyone would believe the story?
20. what time frame did he continue to go back to with questioning? Provide a numbered list of answers.
****
A numbered of answers:
1. Oscar Pistorius
2. Gerrie Nel
3. about the killing of his girlfriend
4. he sought to undermine Pistorius' reliability
5. yes
6. Reeva Steenkamp
7. shot
8. bathroom
9. no
10. he mistook her for an intruder
11. yes
12. a noise
13. a noise
14. yes
15. bulldog-like
16. South African legal circles
17. cross-examination
18. with scorn
19. it is improbable
20. early hours of Valentine's Day 2013