Question: Sentence A: This situation could be mitigated if companies had qualified, independent, and adequately resourced boards; however, as I noted previously, this is all too often not the case.

Sentence B: Many boards are interested in their own personal agendas, not that of their companies.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question: Sympathetic reporters--see Sidney Blumenthal--are ostracized.
Reporters are ostriches.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Problem: Here is a premise:
Was it worth it?

Here is a hypothesis:
Was it useful?

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Sentence 1: And a trip on a lake ferry can be run in any sort of weather.

Sentence 2: Lake ferries only operate in July.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: no

Question:
Christopher Dunn related that his research interventions took 30 to 40 minutes, but his interventions outside the research arena took about 20 minutes because the process did not have to be so complicated and uniform, and there was less data collection.

Does it follow that "Christopher estimated that his research interventions took between two and three hours."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
no

Question:
Based on the premise "Accordingly, in 1996 Congress added new restrictions to the LSC Act and strengthened existing restrictions.", can we conclude that "Congress has never made changes to the LSC Act. "? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
no