FYI. I got this from mike late last week. Any comments? It looks very early in their development but Mike may want them to talk to a couple of people here about their site. We need to be helpful if it will help his business. Dan are you up to speed on this? If not please call him and get his viewpoint as well. Mike
Answer: Nodocero.com
Here is an email: Arun is going to have to bring down the Curve Manager due to these issues: No 10/31/01 or 11/1/01, due to this ST is having to mark 12/1/01. Arun is going to fix these issues: he will have to bring it down and then back up. In about 20min (10:45) please log out and login -> then check to see what needs to be remarked. Thanks,
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: Curves 10/1
Q: Could you please set up the computer training room so I can log on and display a spreadsheet on the screen. We are having a meeting at 3:30. Thank you
Propose a subject line
A: Computer Training Room
IN: I made room reservations for the 3 of us on November 5 only at the Sheraton Uptown (505-881-0000). The rooms are not guaranteed past 6:00 pm. Our confirmation numbers are as follows. Ron M. 118587 Darrell S. 118588 Dennis A. 118590 I checked on flights and the best bet is a 2:30 pm flight arriving Albuquerque at 3:36 pm (next one wouldn't get in until 7:37 pm). Flights back to Houston are 2:40 pm and 4:30 pm arriving at 5:37 & 7:37 pm respectively. I vote for the 4:30 pm flight to make sure we don't run short on time. LET ME KNOW ASAP MONDAY TO BOOK. Right now the fare is $156.25 & non-refundable. Not sure what it will be Monday. Kim, I don't know your plans in and out of Albuquerque so I didn't book a room for you. I thought you were headed elsewhere from Albuqueruque. Let me know if you want me to do something on arrangements. Ron M.

Generate a subject line.

OUT: Albuquerque Cross Functional Meeting
IN: This is an email
Joe: Did you ever contact them about the confirms that they sent to us? Are they now signing our confirms? Please advise as to what, if anything, I need to be doing on this. Thanks. Carol

What is the subject?

OUT: CLECO
Jeff: Thanks again for all of your time and consideration with respect to our con= sideration of Norm Pedersen to join our Firm in Los Angeles. I just wanted= to let you know that we decided it probably did not make sense to pursue t= hings further with Norm. After drilling down even further, it just seemed = like we were going to run into major conflict problems down the road based = upon the CA regulatory proceedings that likely are going to arise and the n= ature of Norm's historical client base. It also would not have been fair t= o Norm to have him join the Firm and then be conflicted out of work that he= had planned to pursue at the Firm. I can't tell you how much I appreciate= your candor as well as your open-mindedness in helping me evaluate the sit= uation. I really felt bad bothering you with this, but I knew you would ha= ve the best insights into the likely direction of the regulatory proceeding= s in CA and I wanted to make sure that I was being fair in evaluating Norm'= s situation and in a position to make a decision based on all of the releva= nt facts. I also want to emphasize emphatically (if it is possible to use = those words together!) that I do not want you to think or feel that you "ni= xed" Norm or anything along those lines; indeed, I feel quite the opposite.= In addition, from the outset, after first talking to Norm and getting a s= ense for the types of business he has been handling and the issues he has b= een pursuing on behalf of his clients, I had felt it was really a non-start= er since the last thing I wanted to do was to have LeBoeuf on the other sid= e from Enron in important regulatory proceedings for the company. It is on= e thing to receive a waiver to represent another company in a negotiated co= mmercial transaction in which Enron is relying on another law firm, but I c= ould not see us pressing a regulatory agenda directly adverse to Enron's in= terests in a proceeding in which Enron was a major participant and which we= knew going into the proceedings at the start that our representation would= be adverse to Enron. As Rick may have told you, there have been some situations where we have be= en adverse to the Company or at least representing clients that did not see= "eye to eye" with Enron on all of the issues. These generally have been s= ituations involving historical client relationships that go back decades wh= ere Enron has itself been using Bracewell, for example, and Rick has been i= ncredibly gracious and understanding in not conflicting us out of those pro= ceedings. Nonetheless, I am trying to do whatever I can to try to eliminat= e or reduce the number of those situations on a going forward basis, althou= gh I know I will not be able to eliminate all of them in light of the size = of our Firm and the diverse nature of its client base. Jeff, I will follow up with you personally, but I just wanted to drop you a= quick note to thank you for the time and thought you devoted to this. I'=
Answer:
Follow up