In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence can be inferred from the statement. Incorrect choices change the meaning in important ways or have details that are not mentioned in the statement. Indicate your answer as 1,2, or 3 corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

Statement: As for the statement relating to the destruction of the will, the prisoner had formerly practiced at the Bar, and was perfectly well aware that the will made in his favour a year before was automatically revoked by his stepmother's remarriage. Choices: 1. The prisoner tried to have the will remade to be more favour some to himself. 2. The prisoner knew that the will made in his favour the prior year was revoked when his stepmother remarried. 3. The prisoner was once a lawyer before he was captured.
2

Statement: Proposed vertical flight only, to a maximum of 20 feet above the ground. Choices: 1. The proposed vertical flight is said to reach heights of 50 feet above the ground. 2. The maximum altitude for the flight is 20 feet above the ground. 3. The maximum vertical flight of only 20 feet above the ground is due to the limitations of the technology.
2

Statement: and uh now i got back i got kids in college and gosh i can't afford that price so i still keep them in my name but the guy who takes them calls me every year and says can i have the tickets one more year i say yeah fine take them Choices: 1. Now that I have kids in college, I can't afford that price. 2. It could afford the price before my kids went to college. 3. I can still afford it, even with my kids in college.
1