input question: For case studies in particular, there must be an empirical basis for instance selection and assurance of adequate population homogeneity. If this premise is true, does that tell us:"It's important because there's a broad base of information being considered in the case study."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: it is not possible to tell

Question:
Based on the premise "Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) of 1995 (Public Law 104-13) a PRA applies life cycle management principles to information management and focuses on reducing the governmentas information-collection burden.", can we conclude that "Before the Paperwork Reduction Act, offices were overflowing with papers."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
it is not possible to tell

Question: Sentence A: they just changed it because X had a connotation with it you know so

Sentence B: X was never involved in the decision.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question: Or finally, take privacy again.
Privacy is taken again.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Problem: Here is a premise:
Had we not done this, very few Italian routes would be profitable.

Here is a hypothesis:
We did nothing and the Italian routes were profitable regardless.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question:
Alcohol and injury in the emergency opportunities for intervention.

Does it follow that "Alcohol and injury are not in the emergency opportunities. "?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
no