In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.
One example: Comment: President lied under oath about consensual sex...
Not the same thing as rape.
Solution is here: Sexual-explicit
Explanation: This comment explicitly mentions "consensual sex" and "rape", and thus is sexual-explicit.

Now, solve this: Comment: It is devastating how many secrets are going untold in this article. John Javelet is being charged with 4 counts of rape, because this girl had a false I.D that stated her age as 19 which means he had NO IDEA this girl wasn't over the age of 18. Yeah, he had a criminal record that wasnt very good but HE'S NOT A RAPIST AT ALL!!! Actually he is one of the best people i have ever met, he was the only one who protected me from my extremly abusive boyfriend.
Joshua Wesley Sherman is my BEST FRIEND. Yeah, his record is bad also but the Lane County Legal system is cruel and unusual. Most everything they claim he did wasnt true. They just pinned him guilty by making it his only option.
They tell you the details they want to but they arent telling you EVERY DETAIL. Joshua wasnt present when the crime was commited he has an alibi but they silenced her. If the TRUTH came out maybe it wouldnt go unnoticed when the police do faulty ass shit.
Solution:
Sexual-explicit