Sentence 1: yeah yeah well you know they're so large they animated it

Sentence 2: They're so large they animated the TV show
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question:
One part each, lending each its own essential quality to the mixture, so that the sky is solid as earth, radiant as fire, formless as water, insubstantial as air.

Does it follow that "Equal parts earth, fire, waster and air."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
yes

Q: If it's complicated, can we say that "It isn't simple."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A: yes

Premise:
"That explains everything! "
Hypothesis: Everything is explained.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

yes

input question: By then Gore will be campaigning seriously, distancing himself from Clinton, and running macho ads; Bradley will have defined his big ideas and endured the inevitable media backlash to his current rave notices; and the voters will actually be paying attention. If this premise is true, does that tell us:"Gore is going to try to stay far away from Clinton's bad reputation."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: it is not possible to tell

Q: If With respect to Jacob Weisberg's Ballot Box (), he makes one decent point, and then blows it., can we say that "There is a universal love for Ballot Box."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A:
no