[QUESTION] Given the sentence "Cyclists are riding their bikes on an indoor track." can we conclude that "The cyclists are riding their bikes on a mountain terrain."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
The cyclists can not ride on an indoor track and a mountain terrain at the same time.
The answer is no.

Q: Premise: "Two skateboarders look on while another boarder gets ready to do a stunt on the street."
Hypothesis: "They are at a skateboard park."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
A: Two skateboarders and another boarder can be commonly referred to as they.
The answer is yes.

QUESTION: Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "A hiker posing on a cliff high in the mountains."
Hypothesis: "The hiker takes a piacture."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell

Let's solve it slowly: Just because the hiker is posing doesn't mean the hiker is taking a piacture.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

[QUESTION] Can we conclude from "Three guys in military clothing dig a hole in the desert with shovels." that "Three soldiers are on patrolling the perimeter on foot in the jungle."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
They could not be patrolling if they are digging a hole.
The answer is no.

Q: Premise: "Man performing stunt."
Hypothesis: "Lady breaking block on his stomach with sludge hammer."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
A: A lady is breaking a block on a stuntman's stomach with a sledgehammer.
The answer is yes.

[QUESTION] Premise: "A man is lying in the snow with a pair of skis on and snow attire."
Hypothesis: "Nobody is lying."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
There is a man lying in the snow instead of nobody.
The answer is no.