Anna: I just received your voice mail. The package (including the Enron Corp. guaranty) has already gone out via Federal Express to your attention. You should receive it tomorrow. Also, Enron North America Corp. would like to assign the agreement to Enron Credit Inc. (a Delaware corporation). Would you like for me to prepare the assignment or shall I? Please advise. Thanks.
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: Securities Loan Agreement
Bill, I think you are confusing me with John Lavorato my COO. I am a University of Saskatchewan grad. Regardless, if I can help lets discuss in the new year. Regards
Answer: Recruiting/Sponsorship at Ivey
Here is an email: In the wake of US and British military action in Afghanistan, Washington has become increasingly concerned about the potential for a major military conflict between Pakistan and India, according to a high level US intelligence official, and the control of nuclear weapons in the region is being monitored. There is also fear for instability in Saudi Arabia, where little information is available about the capabilities and intentions of Islamic extremist elements. Consensus opinion has been built in Washington that Iraq was involved in the 11 September terrorist attacks on the US, exacerbating fears that the situation in the region could spiral out of control. According to a senior US intelligence official, US policymakers have become increasingly concerned about the prospects for instability in the Middle East and South Asia. Washington is focused particularly on the potential for a major conflict between Pakistan and India, and intelligence officials are attempting to track the location and control of nuclear weapons in the region. Secretary of State Powell's trip to the two countries, although portrayed publicly as part of the effort to ensure support for US military action in Afghanistan, is in fact intended to address tensions between Islamabad and New Delhi, which have grown in recent days. (India shelled several Pakistani military outposts in the disputed Kashmir territory today; an Indian army general described it as a "punitive action.") Washington is also significantly more concerned than media coverage would suggest over the potential for major unrest in Saudi Arabia. This fear is heightened by a lack of detailed information available on the royal family's grip on power and the capabilities of Islamic extremist elements in Saudi Arabia, which share similar goals: removal of the Saudi dynasty, establishment of a true Islamic state, and the removal of the US military presence. Saudi and US officials regard bin Ladin as one of the prime perpetrators of Islamic extremist violence in Saudi Arabia and elsewhere in the region. Bin Ladin has been outspoken in his criticism of what he calls 'military occupation' of Saudi Arabia. Unrest in Saudi Arabia could have a relatively dramatic impact on regional stability and the global economy because of its leading role both in the Arab world and in OPEC. US government officials are now generally convinced that the Iraqi government played a role in supporting the 11 September terrorist strikes in the US. The well-publicized difference of opinion between senior State and Defense Department officials over the handling of the Iraq question has been reported accurately in the media. Concern is growing within Washington that the situation in the Middle East could spiral out of control if Iraq were drawn into the military conflict precipitously, if major hostilities between Pakistan and India were to break out, or if the Saudi royal family's grip on power were to loosen.
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: Increasing Washington Concerns over Potential Instability in Pakistan, India, and Saudi Arabia
Q: David: Here is a draft of the ETA amendment letter that we have been discussing with Kennecott. It includes my proposed modifications to deal with giving them the termination right which I have highlighted. The current ETA states that all notices become effective immediately. I have inserted in my language a 3 day period after we receive a termination notice before it becomes effective. This creates a difference between Us and our Counterparty's since our termination notice would become effective immediately. What do you think? Do we need this 3 day period or are you okay with having their termination notice becoming effective on the date of our receipt? Carol
Propose a subject line
A: kennecott
IN: No wanting to incur the wrath of Jen for failing to keep you informed. Monte Montgomery will be playing at The Fabulous Satellite Lounge May 6. Hopefully, we can make this one.

Generate a subject line.

OUT: Don't make the same mistake twice...
IN: This is an email
Further to our conversation, please see attached Sample of our Master Agreement and GISB. Please do not hesitate to give me a call to discuss any issues and or concerns you may have regarding this matter. Regards,

What is the subject?

OUT:
Agreements