And after she had spoken, Bertha Spahr also spoke, as well. She's the department chairperson, and, actually, I had her as a science teacher. And she presented information to the board, documents, that she and I believe other members of the science department had researched on, I guess cases that had been set down before on creationism in the public school system or something of that nature, just to show them that, you know, if they were still considering this idea, that they might, I don't know, be met with some litigation or something.
Bertha Spahr was an educator OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No
A: Yes

-- I really think this is an important question and, as Justice O'Connor points out, if we have to ask what's the most plausible explanation for this rule, to reward existing vested interest or to stimulate former new works, it seems to me that it's probably the former.
Justice O'Conner thinks the rule favors stimulating former new works OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No
A: No

Pete's Popular Pens<br>Pete made custom pens in his garage. His pens became very popular with businesses in his hometown. He decided to expand his pen business. Pete opened a shop and hired four employees. Now Pete sells his popular pens nationwide.
4 workers were hired by Pete. OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No
A:
Yes