Premise:
"In addition, the rule is expected to result in less volatility of producers' incomes and less risk of no income due to adverse weather events and rural communities and producers will benefit from the certainty of payments in times of catastrophic yield losses."
Hypothesis: The rule is supposed to help the producers out.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

it is not possible to tell

input question: Swaying rhythms are among the most appealing aspects of life in the French West Indies. If this premise is true, does that tell us:"The stiff and reserved culture of the French West Indies is its strongest feature."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: no

Question:
Based on the premise "and then you'll have a realistic assessment of what you're getting", can we conclude that "at that point what you're getting becomes pretty clear"? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
yes

Question: Sentence A: As the teeming millions flock to the Web, is it devil take the hindmost in the scramble for resources?

Sentence B: There are less than 2 dozen people moving to the Internet.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question: It's like campaign-finance reform--the people who control it are products of the system, says online voting evangelist Marc Strassman.
Campaign finance reform is a lost cause until outsiders control the reform movement.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Problem: Here is a premise:
I sent her out.

Here is a hypothesis:
I commanded her to stay.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer:
no