Premise:
"We did this even though the white South African government was a staunch U.S. ally in the Cold War, while Nelson Mandela's African National Congress had extensive Communist and Soviet ties."
Hypothesis: Even though the white South African government was a staunch U.S. ally in the Cold war, we still did this.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

yes

input question: But if smoking is addictive, then it makes sense to try to keep tobacco out of the hands of kids who are too young to take the warnings seriously. If this premise is true, does that tell us:"Young kids often become addicted to smoking when they find cigarettes. "?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: it is not possible to tell

Question:
Based on the premise "The tobacco industry suffered a potentially catastrophic defection.", can we conclude that "A potentially dangerous defection has been suffered by the tobacco industry."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
yes

Question: Sentence A: The chant changed, after a long moment of silence.

Sentence B: After the silence, the chant resumed in a different language.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question: Krugman would also have found out that the Buenos Aires Stock Exchange is not representative of the way things Bonds are important, and what businessmen are doing is important.
Bonds are crucial to the economy.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Problem: Here is a premise:
it is not oh i always thought that it was

Here is a hypothesis:
I always thought so because of the lessons I took while I was a teenager.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer:
it is not possible to tell