In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.
One example: Comment: President lied under oath about consensual sex...
Not the same thing as rape.
Solution is here: Sexual-explicit
Explanation: This comment explicitly mentions "consensual sex" and "rape", and thus is sexual-explicit.

Now, solve this: Comment: Your emoji notes that you disagree Catherine. Did it not happen? Or, was Jesus, the perfect, white quaterback handsome man pretend nailed to a ceramic model or a beaten, tortured middle eastern threat, rough nailed to the splintery remnants of a tree, in excruciating pain and rendered bloodless and with no heart-beat...dead...a cadaver to be removed and gotten rid of, except that a follower treated the dead man with respect? Is that not a chapter in our story? Or is your "faith" not able to handle the reality of Jesus incarnate in time.
Solution:
Non-sexual-explicit