Question: Sentence A: Neatly arranged, there is nothing to offend the eye."

Sentence B: It is easy to see that there was nothing offensive after it had been cleaned thoroughly.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question: it's too many for students
It's too many homework for college students
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Problem: Here is a premise:
The creator of this unusually successful way of reducing stress was one Antoni Elkbellows, a man possessing a long and confirmed by genetic studies lineage, according to which he was a direct descendent of a respectable family of magnates from nearby Pila - the Oxbellows.

Here is a hypothesis:
Antoni Elkbellows was a 30 year old psychiatrist who suffered from depression.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Sentence 1: He's the darkness reaching out for the darkness, Howard Hunt tells John Dean in the film.

Sentence 2: Howard Hunt says that he is darkness reaching for darkness.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: yes

Question:
Suppose Shepard is right that we are understating productivity growth by, say, 1 percent.

Does it follow that "Shepard is correct that our productivity growth is higher than we say."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
yes

Question:
Based on the premise "Then came the timid archdeacon, a little bewildered by the company in which he found himself, glad that his daughter was considered to have distinguished herself, but unable to help glancing at her from time to time with nervous apprehension.", can we conclude that "The archdeacon was proud that his daughter was being honored."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
it is not possible to tell