Attached please find the referenced counterparty approval lists. Per my conv. w/Frank and Leslie Hansen's emails, on a going forward basis, U.S. based counterparties should not be approved for European based physical power products, and vice versa. I don't know how you want to handle that, I have not "Xed" out European physical power from the attached list. What should we do on a going forward basis?
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: Counterparty Approvals for 12/16 and 12/17
One of the guys here recieved a call from a guy at EES looking for contacts at gas utilities in the Northwest. They are hoping to sell them some sort of deal where they provide the utility structured products and the utility pushes them through to the endusers... isn't that my Cascade deal? Let's discuss Monday, it sounds like something we need to nip in the bud.
Answer: EES
Here is an email: Andrea, We would like to bring Sladana Anna Kulic into the Risk Management group. The location may change. Sladana Anna Kulic EB3265B Energy Operations ENA 083E 103845 David Baumbach Thanks.
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: Analyst
Q: Debra - Please prepare a Master Firm draft per the attached. Send electronic copy to Kim Ward for futher handling to counterparty; please copy me as well. Thanks,
Propose a subject line
A: Imperial Irrigation District
IN: The company is 50 mw's long onpeak under deal 683846.1. Either leave in the pool or sell balance of the day. The sale side should go under Ercot Options book. The power is currently scheduled to the North Zone. JMF

Generate a subject line.

OUT: Ercot Options book is long tomorrow 7-22
IN: This is an email
Max, congrats on the Decero PPA - we need to wrestle up another 100 to 200 MW. This should be a priority given the profit potential of this deal as per Oz and Doug (+50M in 2000). Is there an ability to let Sabine or Irvin run with Vitro and get your attention on this item asap. I know that the Monterrey project is eating into your time. Do we need to augment your resources? On a different note, the current Monterrey control budget is showing a $5.3M negative variance from the original control budget. Is this accurate? Does this reduce the profitability or is it absorbed by the PPA's? Regards

What is the subject?

OUT:
Various