QUESTION: Dear MONIKA, Congratulations! You have been successfully enrolled in the course 'Applied Risk Management Principles'. Course details are provided below: Course Type : Instructor Led Course Course Code : ARMP Session Code : 113001 Number of Units : 0 Price : $350.00 Location : Doubletree Hotel Dallas St. Houston, TX Meetings : Start Time: Nov 30, 2001 8:00 AM End Time: Nov 30, 2001 12:00 PM No instructors or rooms have been assigned to this meeting. You will receive a reminder before the session starts. Thank you.
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: You are enrolled.

QUESTION: Errol, Could you refresh my memory on who you sent the Canadian gas deals to for valuation? Sheila Glover is requesting that we gather the valuations and documentation for those transactions this week. As RBC owes Enron the settlement amount, we'd like to move quickly on this one. Thanks very much for your help. Please call if you have any questions at all.
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: trade values

QUESTION: I read Wednesday's NGPL order (RP00-18-002) as applying only to NGPL due to their unique restrictions and tariff rules. I do not read it as forcing the rest of the industry (i.e., us) to use the floor rate as the reserve price for negotiated index rate bids and ordinary recourse rate bids. I think we can still determine the reserve price on a prearranged deal like the ENA deal based on our good faith valuation of the upside provided by the index mechanism. I.e., on that type of deal, we can determine that the index mechanism is worth "x cents" to us and require a discounted recourse rate bidder to bid more than the floor plus x cents to win. Agreed? Note that NGPL whined that the unique rules they are subject to place them at a competitve disadvantage to the rest of the industry (i.e., us) on this issue. The commission didn't say anything about that, implying to me that the rest of us are still free to do what NGPL cannot do. DF
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS:
ENA Deal