Q: Ken: I am writing to seek coming back to Enron. I chose retirement in April this year at age 57 because we all thought the stock was going to $120 or thereabouts. We know what happened. I was your VP of Engineering for EE&CC under Larry Izzo. You might remember me, we last met at your Marco Polo awards dinner, my wife, Brenda, was the one in the Red wheelchair talking with Mr. Kissinger. I could help bring some intellectual capital back to Enron and help the company succeed. My resume is attached. I appreciate any consideration you can make. Thanks,
Propose a subject line
A: Update on Retirement
IN: I think I have 12.5 days left. 1. I plan to carry 5 days to 2002 2. 1/2 day October 25 and October 26 (teacher's conferences, field trips) 3. November 21 4. December 26, 27, 28,31 5. 1 extra day Nov 26?

Generate a subject line.

OUT: remaining vacation
IN: This is an email
John, Further to the voice message that I left you, I have recalculated the amount of security that would be required if all of the modified direct sales contracts are acknowledged by noon January 4. The calculations are still a bit rough but I thought this spreadsheet would provide you with something to review. I have used a $35 Pool Price in the calculations. Note the additional tabs in the spreadsheet that detail the hourly generation that the Pool has received for SD3 and SD4 . In determining the actual security required, we will need to review the megawatts in the contracts registered in detail once we have the acknowledgements tomorrow. For simplicity I have assumed that everything is base load and I know this is not correct. Once we know exactly what contracts we are looking at, we can fine tune the calculation. <<December SD3 and SD4.xls>>

What is the subject?

OUT: Enron Security
QUESTION: Louise has asked me if you are available to meet with Duke Energy on Friday November 2nd at 3pm. Please let me know your availability. Thanks Sue TIM: can you make sure that Jeff gets this message. Thanks.
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: Meeting with Duke Energy
Project OZ The deal team is proceeding post-haste to draft a definitive term sheet. Bjorn - you're correct - term is now 8 years likely to be 10 $40 million working capital facility - advance rate will exceed market - i.e. a portion of this is really equity crack spreads - will be widened (still fine tuning) Minimum investment case - Morgan Stanley bridge, refinery cash flow to supply capex for Tier 2 upgrades, current volumes After closing, to continue investigating expansion (max capex case) with [option] to hedge larger volumes ( ?- what if we don't agree with expansion plans) RAC draft DASH with deal team's comments expected back this afternoon - will circulate promised model by EOD tomorrow anticipate that deal team will try to get approval delegation at the next BOD meeting (about ten days to get thru RAC process)
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: Update from the Wizard
Make sure on the TDS Curve Manager not to hit the button on the publish sheet. This button normally brings in the latest version of code, however the latest version does not include information for the 'Y' curve. This will be fixed after the code freeze that is now in place is released. Any questions or problems, give me a call. Russ
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer:
Important - GDI 'Y' Curve Manager Issue