TASK DEFINITION: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.
PROBLEM: Comment: Yes, your analysis is crap. Your first statement is apples and oranges. The Canadian soldiers don't have to sue to get their benefits (although Harper was headed that way). You haven't read the case so you have no clue what it was actually about. Finally, the "lefties" applaud getting the damn thing over with at a lower cost. Your problem was with the 3 previous governments, this part of things was inevitable. Harper (he did love losing at the Supeme Court)would likely have been stupid enough to fight it and triple the cost.

SOLUTION: Obscene

PROBLEM: Comment: IF you are perverted enough to believe what you wrote, you need to stop listening to CNN and stay away from Hillary and the DNC. For 8 years we've had a race baiting president that lied his way into office hand had one failure after another and i'm betting you soaked it up ignoring or making excuses for all his failures. Our country will again move forward as the damage Obama did to us is repaired. Wake up and smell the coffee..

SOLUTION: Non-obscene

PROBLEM: Comment: I said human flourishing and enjoyment, I have a vasectomy and still have sex 4-5 times a wee (with my wife)...Read my post below. I can state and believe something is wrong, but still defend someones right to live as they please, which is my position. I have a homosexual uncle who I will tell him it is wrong, but he can make his own choices and live his life the way he wants to, but one day he will be accountable for the choices he makes.

SOLUTION:
Non-obscene