You will be given a definition of a task first, then an example. Follow the example to solve a new instance of the task.
In this task, you must classify if a given review is positive/negative, indicating your answer as P or N.

plot : two teen couples go to a church party , drink and then drive .
they get into an accident .
one of the guys dies , but his girlfriend continues to see him in her life , and has nightmares .
what 's the deal ?
watch the movie and " sorta " find out . . .
critique : a mind - fuck movie for the teen generation that touches on a very cool idea , but presents it in a very bad package .
which is what makes this review an even harder one to write , since i generally applaud films which attempt to break the mold , mess with your head and such ( lost highway & memento ) , but there are good and bad ways of making all types of films , and these folks just did n't snag this one correctly
.
they seem to have taken this pretty neat concept , but executed it terribly .
so what are the problems with the movie ?
well , its main problem is that it 's simply too jumbled
.
it starts off " normal " but then downshifts into this " fantasy " world in which you , as an audience member ,
have no idea what 's going on
.
there are dreams , there are characters coming back from the dead , there are others who look like the dead , there are strange apparitions , there are disappearances , there are a looooot of chase scenes , there are tons of weird things that happen , and most of it is simply not explained .
now i personally do n't mind trying to unravel a film every now and then , but when all it does is give me the same clue over and over again , i get kind of fed up after a while , which is this film 's biggest problem .
it 's obviously got this big secret to hide , but it seems to want to hide it completely until its final five minutes .
and do they make things entertaining , thrilling or even engaging , in the meantime ?
not really .
the sad part is that the arrow and i both dig on flicks like this , so we actually figured most of it out by the half - way point , so all of the strangeness after that did start to make a little bit of sense , but it still did n't the make the film all that more entertaining .
i guess the bottom line with movies like this is that you should always make sure that the audience is " into it " even before they are given the secret password to enter your world of understanding .
i mean , showing melissa sagemiller running away from visions for about 20 minutes throughout the movie is just plain lazy ! !
okay , we get it .
. .
there are people chasing her and we do n't know who they are .
do we really need to see it over and over again ?
how about giving us different scenes offering further insight into all of the strangeness going down in the movie ?
apparently , the studio took this film away from its director and chopped it up themselves , and it shows .
there might 've been a pretty decent teen mind - fuck movie in here somewhere , but i guess " the suits " decided that turning it into a music video with little edge , would make more sense .
the actors are pretty good for the most part , although wes bentley just seemed to be playing the exact same character that he did in american beauty , only in a new neighborhood .
but my biggest kudos go out to sagemiller , who holds her own throughout the entire film , and actually has you feeling her character 's unraveling .
overall , the film does n't stick
because it does n't entertain , it 's confusing , it rarely excites and
it feels pretty redundant for most of its runtime , despite a pretty cool ending and explanation to all of the craziness that came before it .
oh ,
and by the way , this is not a horror or teen slasher flick . . .
it 's just packaged to look that way because someone is apparently assuming that the genre is still hot with the kids .
it also wrapped production two years ago and has been sitting on the shelves ever since .
whatever . .
. skip it !
where 's joblo coming from ?
a nightmare of elm street 3 ( 7/10 ) - blair witch 2 ( 7/10 ) - the crow ( 9/10 ) - the crow : salvation ( 4/10 )
- lost highway ( 10/10 ) - memento ( 10/10 ) - the others ( 9/10 ) - stir of echoes ( 8/10 )
Solution: N
Why? The phrases used in the review convey a negative sentiment (e.g. "presents it in a very bad package").

New input: review : a dog of flanders is the story of an adorable little boy named nello and his trials and tribulations in 19th century flanders . living with his grandfather jehan ( jack warden ) in poverty , nello finds happiness in his life in spite of difficult times ( they are renting a spare one - room cottage , and the greedy , malevolent landlord who owns it threatens to throw them ' out of the house ' if they do n't pay the rent ) .
nello also has a rather creative talent for drawing some of the most beautiful pictures that i have ever seen , in either a movie or in real life .
( his hero is peter paul rubens , the great flemish painter of the 17th century . )
not that these are the only things that make nello 's life happy , however .
he has a dog of flanders , whom he names patrasche , who is a heroic rin - tin - tin of the 19th century , whom he rescues from his cruel , unkind master .
in addition , he even has a best friend ( and future sweetheart ) in the lovely , wealthy aloise , whose father strongly disapproves of her hanging out with ' lower - class ' nello .
( he thinks he 's not good enough for her , and he would hate the idea of the two kids marrying . )
but then , he was a poor guy himself before he married ( as mentioned later on in the film ) .
one day , nello encounters a mysterious , yet kindhearted artist named michel la grande ( played wonderfully by jon voight ) , who tells the boy to keep drawing from his heart , and that perhaps one day he might land a career in being an artist .
and every christmas , there is a contest on which is the most beautiful painting of the year ;
the winner getting a lot of money .
eager to save his home ( and his aging , dying grandfather ) , nello willingly decides to become an artist , asking aloise to pose for him .
one night , the two travel to a circus , where they have their fortune told ? one of the film 's most delightful scenes ? that great happiness is destined for them .
she gives the kids a ring , whom nello places on aloise 's hand .
; ) afterwards , the two kids have a rollickingly good time dancing around in front of circus performers .
unfortunately , things are not all ' la - dee - dah ' in this tale .
aloise 's father finally becomes so angry with nello that he forbids him to ever see aloise again .
bad enough that they ca n't see each other ( although we know nello and aloise , do n't we ? )
, but that 's only the start of nello 's troubles .
aloise 's farm is burned down , and nello is wrongfully accused ( by the landord of his cottage ) for starting the fire in order to take revenge on being forbidden to see aloise .
this decreases nello 's reputation around the town , save aloise and her parents , and a kindly miller , william , who is very sweet to nello every time he drops by .
matters get much worse for nello when his grandfather dies , and he has to pay for his funeral .
but then things really get nasty when the landlord exiles nello from his own home ( for not paying his rental ) ?
permanetly .
this means that nello and patrasche have to starve and walk out in the cold , freezing wind .
worst of all , the painting that he has desperately been working on during all this time , ' the portrait of the princess ' , fails to win the prize at the festival .
now nello and patrasche are really depressed , and close to freezing to death .
will nello be able to find any happiness in his life ?
will patrasche save the day ?
will nello make the fateful trip to join his mother and grandfather in paradise ?
a dog of flanders is a delightful , heartwarming family film that is sure to entertain kids of all ages .
even older ones who consider themselves too ' sophisticated ' for kiddie fare will be surprised to hear that this film is for grown - ups , too .
there have been other movies of this ilk ( boy and dog ) , and while this one falls into that category , it is mostly a story about overcoming difficulties and finding a good home for yourself . move over ?
or rather , roll over ?
old yeller , this dog of flanders is a heartwarming delight .
the cinematography , courtesy of walther van den ende is beautiful , and really adds to the powerful drama of the film .
it also gives a feel of being in flanders ( the whole film was respectably shot in flanders ) .
the music from richard friedman is also remarkable ; an evocative , poignant score that recaptures music from the 19th century .
the opening song over the credits is very beautiful ( i hope the soundtrack is available ! )
,
and there 's a brief excerpt of ' cheer up , charlie ' from willy wonka and the chocolate factory ( sung by aloise , to nello , in another delightful scene ) .
the cast is first - rate : jesse james and jeremy james kissner , who play nello , are some of the most endearing , adorable young stars i have ever seen in my whole life
( so are the girls who play aloise , madyline sweeten as the younger , and farren monet as the older ) .
not that they are the only good stars , however .
jack warden is ideal as jehan , eliciting just the right amount of humor and compassion required for the character .
( the scenes involving him and nello are heartwarming , touching ones . ) also , bruce mcgill is charming as the kindly miller william .
he 's
another one of my favorite characters in the film .
but jon voight , as i mentioned before , is the perfect choice for michel .
he brings a mysterious , yet gentle performance that makes us all feel good again when he reassures insecure nello that he * can * win the contest .
but what makes this film fun to watch is how well - defined the characters are , and the pace of the story ( best of all , it has a happy ending ?
though i will * not * give it away ; sorry ) is strong and powerful enough for us to identify with the characters .
for the first time since the beginning of 1999 , there comes a film which does n't rely on popular formula stuff , such as big - budget special effects , commercial rock soundtracks , or any of that stuff .
this one relies on telling a fully character - oriented story , with just the right amount of heart , humor , and drama .
that , to me , is what makes a dog of flanders all the more delightful . eleanor o'sullivan of ' the home news & tribune ' noticed this , and was kind and generous enough to welcome it : ' for want of a better word , a glow surrounds a dog of flanders .
its heart is in the right place and it engages you .
you can guess where the film is going because this is well - traveled territory , but with pros like voight and appealing young performers like kissner , an often - told story is well worth a revisit . '
in addition , there were a couple of other enthusiasts , such as chicago - sun times and the washington post ( you should read their reviews ; they 're really positive ) .
other critics , however , were not so kind .
stephen holden of ' the new york times ' had more than a share of beatings to lay upon a dog of flanders via pen writing .
he found the film to be a ' sea of sugary bromides ' and condemned mr .
voight 's character as ' hopelessly wooden ?
adopts an accent even more indeterminate than the one he came up with for anaconda . '
in addition , ' entertainment weekly ' slam - dunked the film , condemning it as ' the worst family film of the year . '
there have been so many other bad reviews like this , too .
my suggestion : disregard the critics .
they just have a big problem with touching family films , and one should never pay attention to them .
this dog of flanders may only be a little ' family ' movie ( it probably wo n't be a big hit in the style of titanic , but then again no other film has been since then ) , but that is not a bad thing in and of itself .
this is a story that is sure to warm your heart , and that is what really matters about a dog of flanders .
it is also one of the better family films around this year .
none of the other films i have seen this year ( though they were good ) have been so low - key and touching .
if you 're looking for family - style entertainment , look no further than this charming boy - and - dog yarn .
go see it while you still can , for as i mentioned , it might not be a big bow - wow at the box office for a long time .
see it while you can .
there is really no need to compare a multi - million dollar blockbuster such as star wars : episode
i ?
the phantom menace or tarzan , or even the iron giant with a tender , sweet little family movie .
Solution:
P