Question:
Based on the premise " The new health scare is a staph germ that is becoming immune to the antibiotic of last resort.", can we conclude that "The staph germ is a concern in the health industry because of it's resistance to antibiotics."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
yes

Question: Sentence A: When you hunt for bargains in the garment district, it definitely pays to be a savvy and patient shopper, as some of the merchandise could easily have been sitting around in the warehouse for some time.

Sentence B: There are bargains in the garment district.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Question: It adds that prior light truck standards have not been viewed as having federalism implications warranting preparation of a Federalism Analysis.
It adds that prior light truck standards, it was a much nicer place and time
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Problem: Here is a premise:
Toni Morrison's Paradise continues to divide critics.

Here is a hypothesis:
The location of Toni Morrison's Paradise is divisive among certain critics.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Sentence 1: Nothing has changed."

Sentence 2: No changes have occurred.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: yes

Premise:
"um i don't i don't really know about that uh uh if well uh i think i think it's it's only it only applies to certain a very few types of crimes uh murder and i think kidnapping could carry death penalty as well i'm not sure what how what the range is for uh for the crimes that uh would merit a death penalty"
Hypothesis: Some crimes merit the death penalty.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
yes