Q: Presented Title V training to the Flagstaff Team. The training included responsibilities, recordkeeping and semi annual reporting requirements. A meeting was held with representatives of Transwestern and PG&E to discuss activities related to removing PCB's from the Topock Lateral. Sampling data was reviewed and discussions were held addressing past cleaning efforts. PG&E has stated by letter and verbally that natural gas volumes will be decreased weekly until PCB concentrations fall below 5 ppm. Transwestern will be implementing a pipeline cleaning of the remaining 1850 of pipe between our M/S and the PG&E C/S. Included in this cleaning will be decontamination of the additional filter separators and meter runs. Assisted in the compilation and data gathering of the Title V compliance monitoring and annual certification reports for C/S No. 5, Thoreau. The annual blanket request for the Arizona SHPO was submtted for renewal. Notification letters were submitted to the state of New Mexico notifiying the agency of like for like replacements of recipricating engines at the AToka No. 1 C/S. Additional notifications were submitted to the agency apprising them of engine removal activities at C/S's No. 5 and 9 which would impact emissions fees.
Propose a subject line
A: Weekly Activity Report
IN: On October 17, 2001 Rockland Electric Company and PJM filed with FERC a joi= nt application for the transfer of operational control from the NYISO to PJ= M of certain facilities located in Northern New Jersey. The facilities are= the transmission assets in the Eastern Division of Rockland's service terr= itory. This includes approximately 400 MW of load in Bergen County, NJ and= transmission facilities that are already directly interconnected with PJM = (note that other Rockland facilities located in NJ, namely those in norther= n Passaic County and Sussex County (Rockland's Central and Western Division= s respectively) will not be transferred to PJM and will remain under the op= erational control of the NYISO since these facilities are not directly inte= rconnected with PJM nor with Rockland's Eastern Division). The filing requ= ests approval of the transfer by November 30, 2001 which would allow PJM to= take operational control on February 1, 2002 (the filing does not address = what, if any, changes to the operation date might be if FERC does not appro= ve this by Nov 30). Rockland Electric is a subsidiary of Orange & Rockland= Utilities which is a subsidiary of Con Edison. The transfer adds approximately 400 MW of load and 56,000 customers (mostly= residential and commercial) to PJM. There is no increase in supply, there= fore the total load of PJM is increased by 400 MW without any additional re= sources. The transmission assets include 138-kV (8.3 miles), 69-kV (35.9 m= iles) and 35-kV (12.4 miles) transmission lines and 11 substations (the fil= ing includes a detailed description of these assets). Let me know if you require any additional information.

Generate a subject line.

OUT: Rockland Electric Transfer to PJM
IN: This is an email
The ABB breakout contract and the GE breakout contract are just about done. I'm not volunteering for change order duty. Do you think this is a good Roger task?

What is the subject?

OUT: LM6000 Contract Changes
QUESTION: Bill; Spoke to Mike Cashell again this morning. If you remember when we met with him this Spring, he mentioned that Idaho Power had the right to demand energy and or wheel through MPC's system that could cause them to be out-of-balance up to 25% of the time. Starting yesterday Idaho initiated this process. Mike has requested Idaho express their intentions on a preschedule basis where he in turn will notify you. Today (6/22) and throughout the weekend MPC plans to be in a deficit position. You might want to contact Mike (406) 497-4575 to work out a pre-notification process so as to help to identify "trends" so that our Real-Time group will be able to better anticipate MPC's needs. Thanks, John
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: MPC Energy Imbalance II
I would like to formulate the breakout groups prior to the forum. I would like your input on likely persons to put together in these breakout sessions. Let's talk tomorrow.
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: Input on Breakout Groups
Dave: Here is the agreement I received from London which I have revised to apply to the Chicago situation. Let's consider this a rough draft at present. It does identify some interesting issues regarding how this will work. let's get together and go through it and see what we need and what we don't. Let me know what time works for you. Mark
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer:
Back to Back Agreement