The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.

[Q]: Context: 'How about this- You will get 1 food, 1 water and 3 Firewood. I will get 2 Food and 2 Water with 0 Firewood. ' 'Hmm, I think I would prefer your original offer instead. You can have all the food if I can have all the rest.' 'Hmmm i don't beleive i ever offered you everything for all the food. I will need at least one water. lets not be selfish.'
Utterance: 'Oh you are right sorry, I was mistaken. Okay then, how about I get 1 food, 2 waters, and 3 firewood. You can have 2 food and 1 water?'
[A]: No

[Q]: Context: 'I feel for firewood we dont need as much, as we are going to be camping, with that means, in my opinion, with branches and brush available, maybe we can take 2 fire woods, what do you think?' 'Since I got some food already, can I get 3 water, 2 firewood and 0 food then?' 'can we do at least one food? if thats okay with you? I would like to have extra food in case something happens, i will be able to have the extra supplies. '
Utterance: 'ok, so list out the amount you need'
[A]: No

[Q]: Context: 'I like that. How about 3 water for you and 1 firewood?' 'I can give 3 packages of food and 1 water. ' 'So 1 firewood, 0 food and 3 water for you?'
Utterance: 'No 3 packages of firewood, 1 package of water, and I can give you 3 packages of food. I need the Firewood the most.'
[A]:
No