In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

Input: Consider Input: Comment: Quote: "Michelle Obama is taking some heat for recent remarks she made on gender, but I'm struggling to muster outrage given the sheer incoherence of what she actually said."

True, I've rarely found what Michelle says coherent, but I suspect that what she's saying is primarily directed at black communities. She could have gone much further and bluntly stated that blacks coddle far too much the criminality and paternal irresponsibility in black males. (I won't call them men.) That's glaringly obvious and different from mostly white schools where ordinary boyishness is attacked as "toxic masculinity."

Output: Identity-attack

Input: Consider Input: Comment: Just awful.

Output: Non-identity-attack

Input: Consider Input: Comment: That was a weird comment. It may be surprising news to you, but I was not alive during the civil war. Moreover, I have never lived in a southern state. I have no interest in promoting slavery - obviously. Nevertheless, I must resist the liberal need to rewrite history and portray all southerners as racist proponents of slavery. The civil war was a massive tragedy, which probably could have been avoided had cooler heads prevailed at the time or over time through negotiation. From your comment, I suspect that you would be one of those raring to go to war and dispatch from life all those who disagree with you.
Output: Non-identity-attack