TASK DEFINITION: Categorize the comment on the basis of obscenity. If the comment is obscene output Yes, otherwise output No.
PROBLEM: Eliza Kashinsky, you are a sorry, sorry case. Are you so unsure of your dogma that you have to hide your identity?

I have no financial interests in Eugene real estate other than the single-family home I bought when you were just a pain in some parents' eyes.

Yet, in contrast to your ignorance about Eugene development practices, I could qualify as a real estate genius. The redevelopment of the SW-SAZ, _against the will of the community_, would displace working folks in affordable, single-family homes with higher cost condos and apartments.

Please go back to defending the poor, downtrodden atheists (like myself), as you were doing before you moved to Eugene.

-- Paul

SOLUTION: No

PROBLEM: Good idea! Cheap to administer. Also how about a 35% reduction in the number of State employees, a 35% reduction in their pay, and a 35% reduction to the state budget.

SOLUTION: No

PROBLEM: Pro-gun vs. Anti-gun. Anti-establishment vs. Establishment. Anti-Illegal Immigration vs. Pro-Illegal Immigration. Further (better) vetting of immigrants vs. Letting them in with the same system. Call out people that sexually assault/rape vs. Protect/cover up for sexual assaults/rape. Pretty distinct differences. Your vote. Your choice. Choose wisely.

SOLUTION:
Yes