IN: Michelle, We have a reconciling item between SAP Account 0530-10220019 Outflow Clearing and the actual bank balance with Citibank New York 40781075 in the amount of $5,346.46. On 10-26-01 your forwarded to Treasury Wire Transfer Requests as follows: Payee Amount Curr US Amount Denton Wilde Sapte Tokyo $492,120 JPY $4,024.20 Rajah and Tann $2,425.65 SGD $1,332.26 It appears that these two (2) Wire Transfer Requests have not been forwarded to A/P to record the expense. Please arrange to forward the appropriate documentation to A/P during November 2001. Stacey Lee Burnett

Generate a subject line.

OUT: Co 0530 CINY 40781075 $5,356.46 FX Funding
IN: This is an email
Dear Mr. Kaminski, I was referred to you by Dr. Shi-Jie Deng of the Georgia Tech School of ISyE. He suggested I send my resume to you because of my interest in the Energy Industry. I will be receiving my master's degree in Quantitative and Computational Finance from Georgia Tech in December 2001. My academic background also includes a strong emphasis on research, Mathematics, and Physics.

What is the subject?

OUT: Internship
QUESTION: Here's a new deal for you. I've got two follow on deals for K & S, so this one might be a good one to use someone else, if you need and want to. (I hear the rustling of the pines..) Clear outside counsel selections with Jeff, then Mark, etc. Kay
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: CA - Onondaga
Attached are the referenced lists. On the 6/19/00 list for Sithe Power Marketing, LP, they were on the original approval list, and since they are coming through again for SO2, and since I'm not sure if we had SO2 on the original list, I open them up for it just in case. Also, I opened them up for financial, since it appears they have now met the eligible swap participant requirements, even tho' Credit is still not opening them up for financial. ,
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: Counterparty Approval Lists for 6/15/00 and 6/19/00
Please review the order below entered by the United States Bankruptcy Court of the Southern District of New York regarding document preservation. You are instructed to comply with this order, effective immediately. The order requires that we retain all documents (in paper or electronic form) in existence on February 15. Documents created after February 15 must be retained if, as the order states, the document contains information relevant to: (1) any claim or defense that may be asserted in the bankruptcy by Enron or a party-in-interest; (2) the financial condition or otherwise in connection with the reorganization of Enron under the Bankruptcy Code; or (3) any governmental investigation or litigation now underway or commenced prior to the termination of this order concerning (a) Enron or any Enron-related affiliates or individuals, (b) present or former directors or officers of Enron, or (c) any affilitiates, subsidiaries, partnerships or joint ventures or other entities which, to Enron's knowledge, Enron or any Enron-related entity participated. Please regard the terms of the Order as applying to all Enron companies, not just companies that are a part of the bankruptcy proceeding. If you are uncertain whether you should retain any particular document, please call Bob Williams at extension 5-2402. You should err on the side of retaining the document. This order and email instruction supersede the previous order of the Bankruptcy Court and email to employees dated January 14, 2002. Thank you.
Answer: Important Announcement Regarding Document Preservation--Bankruptcy Court Order
Q: Kevin, Attached please find an intial draft of a purchase and sale agreement for the MEGS pipeline (Project Pluto). The document is based on the form of the agreement that was used when we purchased the asset. For review purposes, I have also included a comparison version to show the differences between the agreements. There are several issues that we need to discuss. As a summary, these include: - In the purchase and sale agreement, you will note areas (e.g., the recitals, schedules and exhibits) where I have noted that further text remains to be drafted. In particular, we need to discuss those schedules that identify what documents and contracts we have disclosed to Duke, given that LJM at one point in time was the indirect beneficial owner of this asset through it's one time ownership of MEGS LLC (see Section 3.15 disclosure statement); - Sections 2.2, 3.10 and 11 require Jerry Seade's tax review; - Whether for credit purposes, we need some form of payment guaranty / commitment letter from the parent company of Duke Energy Field Services (see section 7.4(g)); - The assignment agreements that will be required for the Gathering, O&M and Guaranty Agreements. Per the terms of the Gathering and O&M Agreements, no counter-party consents are required; however, a consent will be necessary for the Guaranty Agreement. I would suggest that we try to meet later this afternoon to discuss this agreement (I am tied up until 1:30 or so.) Thanks. Comparison Version:
Propose a subject line
A:
Asset Purchase and Sale Agreement for MEGS Pipeline (Project Pluto)