instruction:
In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.
question:
Comment: north korea 3 atomic bombs 9 million people usa 7000 350 The usa has to find a small country to bomb the shit out of to make itself feel good no mater that kim dum dum is an idiot
answer:
Obscene

question:
Comment: why would an international body need to step into our country's affairs to provide cover for the Librano plan? did the locals (meaning Canadians not come up with the right info for the Librano crew to sell their policy to the masses) or is it that the Keynesians at the IMF were the only ones qualified to provide this 'high level' of expert advice
'it approximates that .......' that was all I needed to read to know the report was bunk - why wasnt it done with census data to have a real picture rather than this line of shit - but that is all we seem to get from the Libranos and their supporters - shit
answer:
Obscene

question:
Comment: Of course KD, the other option would be for the restaurant to simply raise their menu prices a bit and just carry on instead of trying to shame the (lowest paid) employees as the cause.

And if they want to continue being wankers about it, let's see some other honest surcharges added to the bill...like, "$5 to service the company jet" and "$7 for last years vacation in San Tropez".
If you're going to call out extraneous expenses, let's be fair.
answer:
Non-obscene