Problem: Here is a premise:
A negative subsidy is recognized as a direct reduction in expense, not as a revenue, gain, or other financing source.

Here is a hypothesis:
The more negative a subsidy is, the more reduction in expense.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Sentence 1: like uh one time Rick went and uh i went i didn't go with him and his grandmother was sitting there and she said that man across the hall is naked and he was he was sitting in his wheelchair stark naked

Sentence 2: Rick's grandmother said, "The man in the wheelchair is wearing a jacket."
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: no

Question:
(The TV show, it must be said, is far less interesting and sophisticated than the games.)

Does it follow that "The TV show are much more absorbing and interesting than the games."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
no

Q: If EPA has made preliminary estimates of the retrofits of each technology that would result from the Clear Skies Act., can we say that "The EPA has estimated the retrofitting of their assets to be in the millions."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A: it is not possible to tell

Premise:
"He fought his way up the ranks and finally faced his eternal foe."
Hypothesis: He had to defeat demons to get up in ranks.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

it is not possible to tell

Sentence 1: That band has been allocated for use by broadband Personal Communications Services (PCS) licensees.

Sentence 2: PCS licensees may use that band for broadcast, and any other band near it.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer:
it is not possible to tell