Here is an email: Kay, Here is the draft form of the contract I spoke to you about on Friday. I've also sent this to the contract administrative group. If this draft is ok to use, I believe the only thing we have to add to this is the 'PSA'. We could consider this document as our 'Scope of Work' or 'Statement of Work'. I'll be out of the office on Monday, however you can reach me by cell, 713-516-7582 or tex pager 888-662-8505. Thanks,
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: Draft Contract for Plant Protection Service Houston to New Orleans (Jode Corp)
Q: The following reports have been waiting for your approval for more than 4 days. Please review. Owner: Andrew Edison Report Name: AE PLI Seminar Days In Mgr. Queue: 6 Owner: Linda Guinn Report Name: LG - Portland Days In Mgr. Queue: 4
Propose a subject line
A: Expense Reports Awaiting Your Approval
IN: David: Attached is an example of the "tainted swaption". I'd really like to focus on the dates (Trade, Effective, Exercise). Looking forward to call in the morning. Sara

Generate a subject line.

OUT: Kellogg
IN: This is an email
Attached is the August 2001 America's Asset Schedule sorted by Contact. Could each contact please review and identify what assets are "physical assets" in which we have a contractual obligation for asset replacement. Do NOT include any "physical asset" which an outside party has the contractual obligation for replacement. Please be sure to include any off-balance sheet items. Please answer with a "yes" or "no" and resend the attached schedule as your response. This data will be used to validate our corporate insurance charge. Please respond via email by the end of this week . Also, please be sure to copy Kim Harris on your email. Your cooperation is greatly appreciated and please call me (x30925) or Kim (x53474) if you have any questions. Thanks,

What is the subject?

OUT: America's Physical Asset - Insurance Charge
QUESTION: When: Monday, November 19, 2001 10:00 AM-11:00 AM (GMT-06:00) Central Time (US & Canada). Where: ECN 872 *~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~* Background & Meeting Objective: Under the direction of Tim Belden, Kevin Presto, Lloyd Will, Anthony Dayao and Beth Perlman, Todd Busby and I have completed the 3 week analysis of wholesale and retail power systems integration. We would like to present the results of our analysis and discuss recommendations the team believes will lead to cost savings and process efficiencies. The analysis results are enclosed. Agenda; Background Summary of Results Integrated Systems Vision Open Issues Recommendations
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: WHS/Retail Systems Integration Analysis - Results/Recommendations
IN: Julia sent me a copy of your memo following up on one of the questions asked at the session earlier this week. I would like to ask a follow-up question: Do we lose the benefit of the special treatment under the bankruptcy code when we enter into cross-product (i.e. physical and financial products) netting and joint credit support arrangements. If we agree with a counterparty to net all of our trading exposures under multiple agreements (swap agreements and gas, power, steel, coal, etc. trading agreements) to determine how much credit support should be posted and then only ask for a single LC that supports the whole shebang, do we lose this protection since arguably we are no longer just "under a swap agreement?"

Generate a subject line.

OUT:
Letters of Credit; Preference; Swap Transactions