We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Ex Input:
Do you believe,after all you have said demeaning the 2A, Constitution and self-defense, that you should be allowed to purchase and use a gun in times of civil unrest or an attack on your home and family?

Ex Output:
Valid

Ex Input:
Just one month after the September 11 terrorist attacks, an unnamed Washington state woman was stopped for having a loaded two-shot derringer in her carry-on baggage at Sea-Tac Airport.

Ex Output:
Valid

Ex Input:
The ruling didn't lay any groundwork for analyzing the legality of gun bans established by various entities, or laws keeping certain people from buying and owning guns, it did none of that.

Ex Output:
Valid