Q: Just as a heads up... The web site that serves data for Kinder Morgan, Transcolorado, NGPL, etc. is having issues as I write this. The following message comes up when trying to receive point data: An error occurred while executing the page. Please use the "Back" button on your browser to try again, or try again at a later time. If the problem persists, please contact ApplicationName Support (user@kne.com). The error message is: [INTERSOLV][ODBC SQL Server driver][SQL Server]ct_results(): user api layer: internal Client Library error: Read from the server has timed out. Basically, this means their server currently has issues. I just wanted to send this out as a heads up that we could potentially miss some cycle information for the morning reports. Hopefully, the site will stabilize before then. Thanks,
Propose a subject line
A: KNE web site problems
IN: Attached is the Media News draft confirm. Paul will call about that one. Traders will book new deal and kill prior transaction with Affiliated Newspapers. (notice the merger and/or name change issues????)

Generate a subject line.

OUT: Re-Box & Media News Group
IN: This is an email
Rules governing suspension of DA and threats of retroactive suspension We have helped assemble a coalition of ESPs and business customers to get the most liberal rules possible (e.g., customers can renew DA contracts, customers can add facilities if contract permits, ESPs can assign contracts to other ESPs with consent of customer, ESP and customer can modify existing contract provisions.) The ESP coalition that we're a part of will file comments on Wednesday on how the suspension rules ought to work. Retroactively suspending DA remains on the table for debate and remains a threat. But support at the Commission for retroactivity has diminshed considerably and most think that the likelihood of retroactivity is low at this point. One Commissioner--Carl Wood--continues to express support for pushing the date back, however.

What is the subject?

OUT: California Update--11.26.01
QUESTION: Please review and comment on the attached draft statement of organization for the EEI contract working group. Once the statement is agreed to by the drafting committee, I suggest we present it at the next meeting of the Working Group. Given the press of time, I would suggest holding that meeting at EEI the week of October 22. I would propose holding the next meeting of the Drafting Committee in early January around the 15th.
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: Proposed Staement of Organization
I want to take a moment to thank each of you for having a summer Analyst or Associate work on your team. I also want to remind everyone what a high stakes activity this is for Enron. Based on your recommendation, we will make offers at the end of the summer to those interns who perform, and who you endorse as a potential future member of your team. Those interns who have had a good experience and accept our offer will be the lowest risk hires we make - from any source. We will have effectively interviewed and watched them work for 2-3 months. They also have the potential to be the most effective advocates and talent scouts we have, when they return to campus. On the flip side, those who don't have meaningful assignments, or have bad experiences during the summer can severely hurt our efforts. Thank you again for being part of this very important activity. If you have any questions, or if areas of concern arise during the summer, please contact Ted Bland (x35275), Traci Warner (x33242) or me (x36671).
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: Analyst & Associate Program - Summer Interns
Gerald, There are a number of things that have come up on which I hope to get your assistance, concerning both Dow wells 13 and 14 and the land sale to Texas Brine. Starting with Dow, I have written a (very rough!) draft reply to Gary Chapman's letter of October 2 regarding a new amendment to the Brine Services Agreement. We still would like them to buy the pad gas, but, given the equipment purchases needed if we do have to remove the pad gas, we have to have a concrete deadline for whether they will buy the gas (Dec. 14). Even so, in talking to Dave Owen it seems to me that the equipment may not be installed for rebrining by the time we exit the wells. How do we handle that type of delay contractually? Dave Owen has told Dow that we are not interested in allowing the fresh water option that Dow suggested in their letter, so I did not even address it here. I think they understand that we want no part of that. Perhaps we can discuss these and other issues after you've read the draft. As for the Texas Brine land sale, Jean has asked me to draw up a timeline to close. I have spoken to the Texas Brine folks, and unless something goes really wrong with their environmental analysis, we all expect this to close by the end of November. The timeline reflects this, but I would like you to take a quick look and see if I am missing anything, as there really are not that many steps. TB has not gotten back to us on the draft sale document, but I'm hoping to get it soon. There has been a bit of delay as they have requested access to any environmental assessments we have done on the land. All the channels I have pursued tell me there has never been anything done by Enron (per Kyle Purvis). If you know anything about this, please let me know! Do you have a draft of the easement agreement (?) for the March land sale? I don't have alot of details about location etc, but I think I could find them out if necessary. Perhaps while we are waiting for a reply on the sale doc we can hammer out the language for the easements on that and on the new land sale. I think that's it for now, have a great weekend and please let me know if you have time to talk early next week. Thanks! Eva
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer:
Napoleonville Items