In this task, you must classify if a given review is positive/negative, indicating your answer as P or N.

[Q]: in arguably the most anticipated movie this century , george lucas has achieved a very mixed reaction to a sure blockbuster .
despite the fact the script and plot is a bit of a let down , the entire movie on the whole can be considered a milestone in technical excellence , in the sound and special effects department .
in terms of characters , by far the most outstanding and interesting is queen amidala ( natalie portman ) , whose mature performance far exceeds
her tender 14 years of age .
she is one ?
hot ' babe who defines true ? woman leadership ' .
she not only has a presence , but knows how to take command of the situation and save her planet from ruination .
no thanks to the jedi knights who although led by the force , lack leadership qualities in terms of thinking up a plan to do anything .
the young obi - wan kenobi ( ewan mcgregor ) who has a bad hair day in every scene , gets to kill a bad guy in the end , but lacks a love interest to make him a desirable sort of hero .
in fact all the jedi knight are a bit asexual - there must be something about the force which makes them all hermits and loners .
i mean it would be interesting to see yoda 's girlfriend for a change , if he has one .
not much better is qui - gon jinn ( liam neeson ) who mostly broods , and
has a better hair do than obi - wan , but only to find the young anakin skywalker and make the biggest mistake of his life .
also fascinating is george lucas ?
metoclorian ' theory , which claims that micro - organisms live within our cells and tie us to the fabric of the universe .
and it is the high concentrations of these organisms in an individual which make them particularly powerful in the force .
more humerous are the claims to the immaculate conception of darth vader , no doubt a concept stolen from the christian faith , except there will be no christmas to celebrate the birth of this dark emissary of the force .
overall
an experience which is not to be missed because of the very fact that it 's predecessor almost command a viewing of this inferior successor .
by all means not the pinnacle of the star wars phenomena but an adequate addition to the clan . watch out for the next one , it should be one steamy encounter between queen amidala and anakin skywalker - who i believe should be portrayed by ?
leonardo di caprio .
[A]: P

[Q]: in one of my many videos i have attained from the local library , casablanca was my third classic in some weeks .
the others being citizen kane and vertigo ( yes , i am trying to see as many of afi 's greatest movies ever made as i can ) .
but , casablanca stood out from the rest for me : it was actually watchable .
what most hail as the greatest american film ever , casablanca is n't so much a love story as a political frenzy with a love triangle thrown in .
it seems that star humphry bogart spend about 85 percent of the movie with various leaders of the nation instead of with ingred bergman .
that annoyed me , as did the ending .
why did n't the plan turn around ? ! ?
surprisingly , i enjoyed the film .
i liked bogart 's character and his acting
( not over the top as most actors in his era ) .
i once read about if you had a choice to be in a movie , which one would it be , and a women said casablanca .
at first i was thinking to myself " why ?
" then , as i watched the film again , i understood why .
the movie is very well done and the script top - notch , although i doubt i understood more than half of the political mumbo jumbo .
casablanca is , in my mind , no classic ( like solaris ) , but it is a good film and stylishly shot
.
hey , hollywood , how about this : a remake with harrison ford and anne heche ?
now that would be a classic .
[A]: P

[Q]: at the end of an action scene in " lara croft : tomb raider , " a wall collapses near the nubile warrior .
with her face on the floor , she gazes into the rubble , then grins abruptly and says " oh , my car keys !
"
i mention this scene because it was the only moment in the whole damned production that made me smile .
based on an incredibly popular video game , " lara croft : tomb raider " is a lousy movie .
the structure goes like this : poorly - staged action sequence , boring exposition , poorly - staged action sequence , boring exposition , etc . etc . , the end .
basically , the film exists to showcase angelina jolie 's puffy lips and enhanced tits .
close - ups are framed
oh - so - carefully to include her million dollar bazooms .
running scenes highlight her bouncing breasts in vintage " baywatch " fashion .
there 's even include a shower scene that offers a brief side view of them .
but the filmmakers are so inept
they ca n't even flash the audience correctly .
the one extended display of nudity is of - get ready for this - a guy .
for no particular reason , a muscular supporting character strolls around naked for about 30 seconds , with each shot composed to barely cover his package , ?
la " austin powers .
"
now , i enjoy a good looking male body as much as the next gay guy , but what the hell is beefcake doing in a t&a flick aimed at heterosexual males ? of course , what else should one expect in a film that does virtually nothing right ?
"
tomb raider " sets up elaborate action set pieces , then
renders them incomprehensible with needless jump cut editing
( a promising dual bungee cord battle is ruined by excessive cuts ) .
it promises a series of exotic locales , then delivers cavernous sets and grimy matte paintings with smoggy skies . throw in some bargain basement computer graphics
and you end up with the ugliest movie to come down the pike in many moons .
intended to be a rousing " indiana jones " style adventure ,
" tomb raider " lacks any sense of tension .
the low point comes when lara is " threatened " by statues of monkey warriors and a giant multi - armed shiva figure that come to life courtesy of cgi .
easily the lamest menaces i have ever seen , the creatures move like snails and fall apart with a single shot from a gun .
if you ever have to be chased by monsters , pray that you get the monkey warriors .
"
tomb raider " tells a story , sort of .
once every 5 , 000 years , the planets align .
a group of very bad men are out to find two halves of an object that , if reassembled just as the planets align , will give them control over time itself .
lara 's goal is to stop them and rescue her long - missing poppa ( jon voight , jolie 's real life dad ) .
none of this matters though , because stunning gaps in internal logic assure that the plot of " lara croft : tomb raider " is as lame as ever other aspect of the film ? except angelina jolie 's lips and breasts .
[A]:
N