Here is an email: Chris Snyder with FPU called and asked if the New Smyrna point, poi 16160 on contract 100740 (which is the only delivery point on that contract that they permanently acquired through capacity release) could be made a division. The point was acquired through a permanent capacity release transaction as a single point. The problem is that they requested to combine this point into their current dpoa, contract 5002 that has points behind divisions. The allocation reports he gets do not reflect this point since it is not in a division. Can we make a point a division just so the reports can "pick up" the point? Chris also mentioned that he does not want this point in a separate dpoa because he wants to be able to take advantage of the section 11 rights with their other delivery points on their dpoa. Frazier and Teb, please let me know if we can do this so that we can make the appropriate changes in our system. nb
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: FPU
Here is an email: Keith: I am okay with the arbitration and non-exclusive jurisdiction language as currently written as I understand that these concepts were previously agreed to between you and Mary. Here is my understanding of the remaining open issues: 1. Whther termination is automatic or elective on bankruptcy. You are considering our request to make it elective. 2. Loss vs. Market Quotation. We are considering whther we can accept your proposed language. 3. Time period for posting collateral. You are considering how long you need. 4. Cash collateral. I am checking with our office in Canada about this. 5. MAC clause - you are considering whther this should be an Additional Termination Event with the ability to cure by posting collateral or an event that reduces the collateral threshold to zero. 6. Default rate definition - Ed is considering what we can accept in lieu of the ISDA definition. 7. No Fault Termination - we are considering whether we can accept this. 8. Credit thresholds and Rounding amounts - you and Ed to discuss. 9. Acceptable LC Issuers - Ed to consider whther limiting it to US and Schedule 1Canadian banks with a certain credit rating is sufficient with language that the parties can agree to add foreign banks. Let me know if I misstated and of the above issues. Thanks.
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: ISDA Matters
Here is an email: We have 9189/day of supply at Niagara on NFUL and transport through Oct 2001. For April 2001, we sold the Niagara Supply to the Firm Ontario book at $.33. Kimat, I told them to use IM ME CNG as the desk selling the gas.
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A:
NFUL for April