Categorize the comment on the basis of severe toxicity. If the comment is severely toxic output Yes, otherwise output No.

Example Input: She's nice and she means well but I wouldn't wan't her running an after school program let alone the city.
Example Output: No

Example Input: Lots of comments but no facts to refute that their was a family incident that required Mr. Stewart going to court. Did the event happen, sounds like it did, did it frighten the two young women, apparently it did so Mr. Stewart there is enough evidence available in the court of public opinion that kind of parenting doesn't allow you to bully your child under any circumstances and it doesn't help you in trying to win an elect to anything.
Example Output: No

Example Input: Most of the legislators don't even need offices in their districts because the population is small enough most people already just know their legislator. Certainly the larger areas like Fairbanks, Anchorage, Soldotna already have sufficient state offices to handle a couple legislators taking up residence.

The one point I disagree with you on though is expanding the legislature. We've tried measures, including cutting the session from 121 to 90 days to put them back in communities, instead they dither and run up special sessions. Why add more opinions and conflict in, while increasing costs to the public?
Example Output:
No