Problem: Here is a premise:
It might be a 'she,' I suggested.

Here is a hypothesis:
It might be a female, I pointed out.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Sentence 1: However, this indicates that law enforcement is convicting before trying and is ignoring the fact that in performing illegal searches, they themselves are criminals.

Sentence 2: This says the police are giving people fair treatment.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: no

Question:
Between 1993 and 1996, the Postal Service conducted the survey using a relatively small panel of about 400 routes.

Does it follow that "There are over 10,000 total routes."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
it is not possible to tell

Q: If Thus they incur less in-office costs., can we say that "In this manner they accrue fewer in-house expenses."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A: yes

Premise:
"Some of the agencies were beginning to use targeted, proactive notifications of forthcoming rules, and some were experimenting with interactive comment processes."
Hypothesis: Agencies didn't have to experiment or start any new methods at all.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

no

Sentence 1: It is beyond me to chart the future byways of the digital revolution, but I'll venture one counterintuitive Electronic media will usher in a resurgence in the quality and value in handwriting.

Sentence 2: People will become more nostalgic and handwriting will become an admired skill.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer:
it is not possible to tell