This is the content of an email: Howdy all! We currently have an opening in the Real Time Trading Group reporting to Bill Williams III. If you have any questions about this position, please see Bill at the Real Time Desk. A list of responsibilities and candidate requirements can be found below. If you would like to be considered for this position, please contact Julie Kearney (x7404) or Grace Rodriguez (x8321) by close of business on Friday, October 19th, 2001. Regards,

Subject: Position Opening: Real Time Trading Opportunity

This is the content of an email: Attached is an electronic version of the Merger Agreement that we executed = with Dynegy. As is typical with these types of transactions, there are lim= itations imposed on Enron's operations between signing and closing of the M= erger Agreement. Please help ensure that each transaction entered into by = Enron and its subsidiaries complies with the agreement, and particularly Se= ction 7.1 of the agreement relating to conduct of business. Peter del Vecc= hio (at ext. 39875) and Joe Henry (at ext. 51549) are available to help add= ress specific questions regarding our interim operations. Rob Walls, John = Ale, Mark Haedicke and myself are also available, and we will help determin= e if we need Dynegy's consent for any particular proposed transaction. We = are in the process of summarizing the interim covenants, as well as establi= shing certain procedures to ensure our compliance. I anticipate distributi= ng these items on Thursday. We are also having prepared a memorandum regar= ding certain anti-trust and other issues that we need to consider in any in= volvement we have with Dynegy regarding our respective operations. We curr= ently plan on having various presentations regarding the anti-trust matters= . Please pass the merger agreement and the subsequent materials on to othe= rs in your group as you think appropriate. Thank you for your help and und= erstanding in this matter. Lance. =20 Merger Agreement for Project Gipper.DOC=20

Subject: Merger Agreement

This is the content of an email: Friends, Most of you know about our company ValueScience Corporation, though for some this is an introduction. We have been "at it" for two years now, and have created a really special company dedicated to developing world class tools to unravel the mystery of building shareholder value. We have attached a very brief overview and FAQ which will help fill in some of the blanks, but suffice it that we are setting out to completely change the basis on which companies are valued, the way that we understand stock market behavior, and the tools by which Senior Management sets priorities, allocates scarce resources, and values transactions (e.g., M&A, private equity, IPOs, technology acquisition) Please expect us to begin communicating routinely to you about ValueScience, comments on recent market events, insights about trends in value drivers in key markets, etc.. Cheers,

Subject: ValueScience Corporation Overview

This is the content of an email: Tanya: Bob Crane did a deal with the Canadian party identified below. Sounds like he originally told our FX trader that the parties would be EGM (actually ENA) and Enron Industrial Markets ("EIM"). In the end, EIM was not the correct party but the Canadian party was the correct party. Is this trade between ENA and Compagnie de Papiers Stadacona authorized by credit? Is the company eligible? Please let me know what you think. Thanks.
Subject: FX trade Counterparty