Problem: Here is a premise:
That's a question about politics, not economics, so maybe it's best directed to a different sort of expert.

Here is a hypothesis:
The question should be redirected to one knowing politics.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Sentence 1: With a proud octagonal tower that rises out of the top of the structure, it was built to mark the passage of the Emperor Humayun after his defeat in the 1540s.

Sentence 2: Without towers, the structure was made as low to the ground as possible to avoid easy detection from afar.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: no

Question:
The president was [l]onely and starved for affection.

Does it follow that "The president was starved for affection."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
yes

Q: If Others take more pot shots at Plath defenders., can we say that "Others ridicule Plath defenders."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A: yes

Premise:
"Such surprises happen to quite a few of our passengers, but with this satellite you had some extra luck, not every flight is so exciting, the captain remarked reassuringly."
Hypothesis: The captain was frightened by the satellite.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

no

Sentence 1: 78 Text Box 4.2: Government Saving When Reducing Publicly Held

Sentence 2: Economical results of reduction by the Government public held.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer:
yes