Question:
Yet removing the stigma of therapy doesn't mean rejecting consideration of character.

Does it follow that "Rejecting consideration of character is a necessary requirement for removing the stigma of therapy. "?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
no

Q: If The British Mandate, can we say that "The British Freedom."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A: no

Premise:
"yeah they they're always branded you know as a bunch of outlaws and if their if their"
Hypothesis: They are called outlaws, even when it is not a warranted title.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

it is not possible to tell

input question: and no reason to be If this premise is true, does that tell us:"Every reason to be."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: no

Question:
Based on the premise "Gibson's big theory is that Dala's life was defined by his feelings of shame.", can we conclude that "Gibson's thinks that Dala's life was defined by his feelings of shame without realizing that it was actually defined by his feelings of anger."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
it is not possible to tell

input question: um-hum no i just got the bicycle out today and it was real nice outside had to get out to do something If this premise is true, does that tell us:"The weather today was too good for me to stay indoors, so I went for a ride on the bicycle."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer:
yes