This is the content of an email: You have many questions about how the bankruptcy will affect you personally. The HR team is endeavoring to answer these questions. Due to simple logistics, answering each question individually is very difficult. We are working to solve this issue by compiling answers to the important questions concerning employee benefits, expense payments and so on. Answers to the most frequently-asked questions will be posted on the corporate website at www.enron.com. Click on Information for Enron Alumni Affected by Chapter 11 Filing </corp/alumni/> . These Q&A Facts are regularly updated as soon as accurate and factual information is received. In addition, we will have updates on 1-800-97-ENRON. (Option 9) If you have questions that have not been answered, please submit them to the following email address: questions@enron.com A team of people will be answering these questions and posting answers on the above sites as soon as possible. The HR team will also be posting initial Q&A's within the next few days on www.home.enron.com for our current, retained employees. Thank you for your patience as we work through the complexities of the situation. Julie Kearney 503) 464-7404 julie.kearney@enron.com

Subject: Q&A Process

This is the content of an email: Greg, While Enron's management teams are reviewing actions plans for the upcoming six to nine months, I understand that functional transition teams will be assembled to address the planned merger. I would like to register my strong interest in assisting any transition team where my skills could add value. Prior to developing and supporting corporate as well as enterprise systems at Enron my career has spanned across General Electric Capital Services and ABB on a global basis. Much of this experience has included system integration and change management. Let me know if you have any questions to the above. Otherwise, I wanted to let you know of my interest and desire in working towards a successful transition for Enron. Regards,

Subject: Merger Transition Teams

This is the content of an email: Today FERC issued the following draft orders: NYISO TEP and Bid Cap (ER01-3001): Commission granted NYISO's request to extend the currently effective $1000/MWh Bid Caps on certain NYISO adminstered markets, and to extend its Temporary Extraordinary Procedures for Correcting Market Design Flaws and Addressing Transitional Abnormalities, until the Northeastern RTO is operational. The Commission ordered NYISO to narrow the scope of the TEP, and to file tariff sheets doing so within 30 days. NYISO proposed virtual bidding procedures (ER01-3009; ER01-3153): Tariff changes to implement virtual bidding were approved. The changes would allow market participants to bid non-physical generation and load into the day-ahead market and settle the bids in the real-time market. Also accepted were NYISOs Market Mitigation Measures to address gaming or market power strategies that might emerge as a result of the virtual bidding. NYISO - Cost responsibility for new interconnections. (ER01-2967): Tariff changes allocating cost responsibility for interconnection facilities. The provisions allocate to developers 100% of the cost of facilities necessary to physically interconnect the project. Additionally, developers are allocated the coswts for transmission system upgrades that would not have been made "but for" the interconnection, minus the cost of any facilities that the NYISO's regional plan dictates would have been necessary anyway for load growth and reliability purposes. ISO-NE - Interim Bid Caps (ER01-3086): Commission approved extension of bid caps until the Northeastern RTO is operational. Calpine v. ISO-NE (EL01-124): Commission granted complaint by Calpine and Mirant, finding that ISO-NE has amended Market Rule 5 to exclude external contracts from setting the energy clearing price, in violation of a Commission order. If you need further information, please let me know. Susan Lindberg x30596

Subject: Orders issued today in NYISO and ISO-NE proceedings

This is the content of an email: Be sure to read the "Neartown Notebook" article on page 10 of This Week section of today's Chronicle. This is very important for all of us who would like to preserve both the value and the ambiance of our blocks. It tells about a proposal by Neartown to enable property owners on a block-by-block basis to apply for adherence to existing lot sizes (50 x 100 in most cases). As it is, when a developer buys a lot in the middle of a block, he can cut up the lot into as many as three small lots (as many as four on corners) and build out to the property line in some cases. This, of course, makes it hard to sell the other houses on that block for anything but teardowns--very bad news if you plan to make improvements to your home or even keep it up.
Subject: *EMCA* For All of You Trying to Work on Set-Backs--