QUESTION: Attached is the agenda as well as the documentation for the TX SET meeting on 2/12 at the Comfort Suites (directly across the parking lot from the ERCOT MET Center). The meeting will begin promptly at 9:30 AM and will adjourn at 4:00 PM - we have an extremely robust agenda so plan your travel accordingly. Please RSVP by COB Friday (2/8), to Christine Meloro (cmeloro@newpower.com) as well as Terri Waggoner (twaggoner@ercot.com). Hope to see you all next Tuesday! Thanks,
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: TX SET Agenda - Meeting 2/12
Greg: Congratulations - I knew it was only a matter of time. Good luck and hope to see you soon. Hope your family is well. Jay
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: How's the 5 year?
What is a hedge fund? Types of Buy-Side Firms ?Mutual Funds ?Venture Firms ?Leveraged Buyout Firms (LBOs) ?Institutional Money Management Firms ?Trust/Wealthy Client Firms ?Hedge Funds What is the sell side? If you are interested in learning more about the Hedge Fund industry and how to get into the profession, what is the career path for someone in this field, please plan on attending this incite full presentation. When: Tuesday November 11 during the evening break 7:30 PM to 8:15 PM Where: Career Center conference room S420 Who: Ted Janus, CFA Haas School of Business alum with the Palo Alto Investors firm will be giving a brief overview of the profession and allowing plenty of time for your questions. Plan on attending.
Answer: Hedge Fund Careers how to break into the profession 11/20@7:30
Here is an email: Jennifer, Phillip Allen and Keith Holst indicated that the curve changes in question for Socal was simply due to a higher forward market. Let me know if you have any further questions. DG
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: January Gas Curve Validation
Q: The Counterparty System indicates that Louis Dreyfus Energy Corp. CP#84 and CP #31950 were made inactive. There is no reference to any other counterparty in the way of a merger, amalgamation etc. Can you verify this information because we have an active contract in Global between Louis Dreyfus Energy Corp and CMI K#95000446. Thanks for all your help.
Propose a subject line
A: LOUIS DREYFUS ENERGY CORP. and CMI
Here is an email: I have reviewed the La Plata Facilities O&O Agreement. Lee, could you please review the same and see if you agree with this assessment? It appears to me that the pigging facilties could qualify as either of the following: Special Services. This would be subject to prior written consent and agreement between the Operator (TW) and the Operating Committee (TW & NWPLRepresentatives). If NWPL agreed, their share of the cost would be in proportion to their ownership interest. If we did obtain their approval, future O&M cost attributable to the pigging facilities could be shared among the owners. (We've agreed to a flat fee for 2000 through 2003 with a 3.5% escalator starting in 2001.) Addition or Expansion. Demonstrate that the pigging will add incremental transmission capacity. We have to give notice to NWPL and they have 60 days to participate. If they participate, they share in the cost at their ownership interest, but they get a share of the incremental capacity at their ownership interest. If they don't indicate a desire to participate in 60 days, we can proceed with the Expansion (without any approval, but also no cost sharing). Also, any incremental O&M associated with an expansion cannot be passed on to any owners not participating in such expansion. I think if we went the Special Services route, we would need to justify the need for these facilities to maintain the integrity and efficiency of the facilities at current levels. I think we would spend alot of time arguing this with them and in the end they would probably approve it subject to them not incurring any cost. (They probably don't have $260,000 ($1.5MM * .174) sitting around in a budget somewhere that they'd like to fork over for these facilities.) Rich, what do you think? How difficult would it be to demonstrate that these facilities are necessary for maintaining the current operating levels of the facilities? Recommendation: To save us the 60 days notice period of an Expansion, I think we should notify them that it's a necessary Special Service and ask for approval (& to pass along their share of the cost), but to be prepared to eat 100% of the costs to obtain their timely approval and proceed with the installation of the facilities. In this event we would need to agree on the inclusion of future O&M attributable to these facilities. FYI, their ownership interest is still officially 22.3% since they have not executed the Amendment that has been tendered to them 3 times, first by me and twice by Lynn Blair. If they execute the Amendment that incorporates the 4/1/98 expansion of the facilities, their ownership interest will be 17.4%.
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A:
Installation of Pigging Facilities