Question:
Based on the premise "This is a fragment of a will!", can we conclude that "This is an entire will."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
no

Question: Sentence A: A formal demonstration that a system or component complies with its specified requirements and is acceptable for operational use.

Sentence B: There are separate inspections for operational use and non-operational use.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question: GAGAS require additional field work standards for attestation engagements in the following
The additional field work will require about 40 hours to be spent on such.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Problem: Here is a premise:
She shrugs it off.

Here is a hypothesis:
She shrugged it off

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Sentence 1: 4 million, which will be divvied up nationwide.

Sentence 2: 4 million will be divided nationwide, according to the German Prime Minister.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Premise:
"A certain unemployed mathematician from Afroasia worked out the Ligadul's Law, based on which, and after considering a maximum number of variation, one could calculate the so-called near future (counted in days, or at the very most in weeks, from the date of calculation)."
Hypothesis: Nobody has worked out The Ligadul's Law yet, it remains one of the biggest mysteries of our universe.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
no