input question: Are you finding any substantive differences in the way your guides cover the city? If this premise is true, does that tell us:"It's a shame all of the guides quit, we really need some city coverage. "?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: no

Question:
Based on the premise "The rocs had better range and altitude than any planes of equal hauling power.", can we conclude that "The range and altitude of the rocs were far beyond those of the other planes."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
it is not possible to tell

Question: Sentence A: The island is surrounded by coral reefs and reef walls, which provide shelter to hundreds of species of sea creatures and recreation to divers and snorkelers.

Sentence B: There are coral reefs near the island.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Question: There were holes burned in their heads- marks of terminal damage- but their armour was intact.
Their armor kept their torsos safe.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Problem: Here is a premise:
Even if possible, attempts to turn back the technological clock by restricting abortion and contraception would now be counterproductive.

Here is a hypothesis:
Even if possible, attempts to restrict abortion are morally wrong.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question:
The zoo opened in 1913 and was designed with enclosures rather than cages, an idea that was new at the time.

Does it follow that "The zoo opened in 1913 and was designed to solely use cages."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
no