Q: Read the given text and if it has abusive content then indicate via "yes". Otherwise indicate via"no".
We consider the content to be abusive if it contains any of the following instances: (1) Identity Directed Abuse (e.g., Content which contains a negative statement made against an identity. An identity is a social category that relates to a fundamental aspect of individuals community, socio-demographics, position or self-representation) (2) Affiliation Directed Abuse (e.g., Content which express negativity against an affiliation. We define affiliation as a (more or less) voluntary association with a collective. Affiliations include but are not limited to: memberships (e.g. Trade unions), party memberships (e.g. Republicans), political affiliations (e.g. Right-wing people) and occupations (e.g. Doctors).) (3) Person Directed Abuse (e.g., Content which directs negativity against an identifiable person, who is either part of the conversation thread or is named. Person-directed abuse includes serious character based attacks, such as accusing the person of lying, as well as aggression, insults and menacing language.) and (4) Counter Speech (e.g., Content which challenges, condemns or calls out the abusive language of others.). Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].
Its not because of corrupt governments (okay some of it is) but the vast vast vast majority of the problem is that the people trying to help do not understand economics. We ship food, we ship mosquito nets and medicine to these poor places. But how do the locals compete with a product that is free? If I want to manufacture mosquito nets and sell them, who will buy my product when they are being given out for free? If I'm a farmer, how do I sell my crop, when the market is being flooded with free food? We are putting locals out of business. We are creating welfare dependents and then, most insidiously, we change the amount being given year by year. We destroy industries and then cut aid a few years later leaving people to starve and die of malaria. If we wanted to actually help, we would build industries in those places and create jobs so that they can support themselves instead of being reliant on aid. If anyone who reads this wants to help poorer countries, groups together microloans for 3rd world countries. It helps far more than throwing free goods and services at them, and the majority of loans are repaid so your donation (loan) is very likely to get returned to you so you can loan it again.
A:
no