input: Please answer the following: In the sixteenth century the State of Michigan had forests all over. But that has long been gone. Especially, in the state's northeast part the vegetation has been cleared in the twentieth century. Wooded areas were replaced by farm lands. All these farmlands were under heavy Irrigation. At one time, in the sixteenth century, plant species like elm and oak used to be plentiful. We still had some elms and oaks in the twentieth century, but they were not great many in number. Were the northeast Michigan's plant species in less stress or more stress due to salinity in the sixteenth century?
++++++++++
output: less stress
Please answer this: Pat has 2 acres of land next to Tim's property. Tim's land is of similar size. The clay soil on Tim's property is very alkaline, so he had to amend it with aluminum salts to make it more acidic in order to grow crops. The soil on Pat's parcel has a good structure and high infiltration capacity. Pat gets twice as much food of his land every year. Which soil from these two parcels has a high infiltration capacity?
++++++++
Answer: Pat's
Problem: Indiana has decided it wants to do its best to stop contributing to global warming. The first place the government decides to look is at the number of factories that use fossil fuels in production. They plan to shut down many of them in the coming years. Given Indiana does indeed shut down many of its factories, will this result in a higher or lower contribution of carbon dioxide to the atmosphere?

A: lower
Problem: Given the question: Michael and David are two bodybuilders currently getting ready for a competition. A key part of a bodybuilding competition is having darker skin so your muscles will stand out more. To achieve this look, Michael decides to use a tanning bed for several weeks just before the competition. David, on the other hand, decides to avoid tanning beds entirely and rubs lotion on his skin to achieve the same look instead. Who will be exposed to less UV radiation, Michael or David?
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
The answer is:
David
input question: Ecuador and Panama both had beautiful rivers flowing into the Pacific ocean. Ecuador uses their river to dispose of their waste while Panama is very eco-friendly and doesn't do that. Which country dumps more fertilizers into the ocean????
output answer: Ecuador
input question: The southern province was exposed to intensive grazing for many years , and now soil quality is poor and dust storms are present. The northern province has more fertile soil, more trees. Which province experiences less carbon loss????
output answer:
northern