Problem: Here is a premise:
Since the Great Collapse, every country on Earth has had a particular national stereotype, and all the history books have been altered to make it seem forever-so.

Here is a hypothesis:
History has been changed since the Great Collapse to fit different stereotypes.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Sentence 1: Long after, when Nixon was blasted as an anti-Semite, my father told in print and in person of the Nixon he kind; concerned about all on his staff, regardless of ethnicity; pro-Israel; pro-Jewish in every important cause.

Sentence 2: I believe Nixon despite the mischaracterizations of him is a good person at heart.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question:
I stared at Derry.

Does it follow that "I was staring at Derry's nose. "?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
it is not possible to tell

Q: If Dublin is a compact city, and many of its important sites are within easy walking distance of one another., can we say that "Dublin is so spread out one must always charter a horse to reach an important site."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A: no

Premise:
"In New York state, guidelines for an 80-hour maximum workweek were estimated to increase staffing costs by a quarter-billion dollars per year."
Hypothesis: The New York state never issued a guideline about an 80-hour workweek.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

no

Sentence 1: This political process focused as much on social considerations as on the kinds of market forces that shape competitive outcomes.

Sentence 2: Social considerations were considered as much as market forces were.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer:
yes