In this task, you're given a paragraph and title from the research paper. Your task is to classify whether the given title is suitable or not for the research paper based on the given paragraph. Return "True" if title is proper according to paragraph else "False".
--------
Question: Paragraph: Executive summary Suicide mortality Suicide attempts Health system and societal risk factors Community and relationship risk factors What protects people from the risks of suicide? The current situation in suicide prevention What are countries doing about suicide prevention now? Current legal status of suicide around the world and perspectives for change How can countries create a comprehensive national strategy and why is it useful? How can progress be tracked when evaluating a national suicide prevention strategy? The cost and cost-effectiveness of suicide prevention efforts The way forward for suicide prevention What can be done and who needs to be involved? Forging a way forward What does success look like? Key messages REFERENCES ANNEXES Annex 1. Estimated numbers and rates of suicide by sex and age, 2000 and 2012 Annex 2: WHO Member States grouped by WHO Region and average income per capita
Title: WHO Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data CONCEPTUALIZATION AND GUIDANCE

Answer: True

Question: Paragraph: This paper describes the molecular detection of respiratory viruses from nasopharyngeal flocked swabs (flocked swabs) and nasopharyngeal washes (washes) in a clinical setting. Washes and flocked swabs collected from children < 3 years old hospitalized with a lower respiratory tract infection were tested for parainfluenza virus 1-3, respiratory syncytial virus, influenza A and B and metapneumovirus (Group 1) and adenovirus, rhinovirus and coronavirus (Group 2) using realtime reverse transcriptase PCR (rRT-PCR). A consensuses standard was used to determine sensitivity and compare cycle thresholds (C T ) of washes and flocked swabs for each virus and group of viruses. Sensitivities ranged from 79 to 89% and 69 to 94% for flocked swabs and washes, respectively, excluding AdV which had a sensitivity of 35% for flocked swabs. When the flocked swabs and washes of Group 1 viruses were collected on the day of admission, the sensitivity of both sample types was 100%. Wash specimens had a lower C T value and higher sensitivity than flocked swabs; however there was no statistical difference in the sensitivity of a flocked swab (89%) versus wash (93%) for the detection of Group 1 viruses, particularly when samples were collected on the same day. Flocked swabs may be a useful alternative to washes for detection of respiratory viruses in clinical settings.
Title: Comparison of nasopharyngeal flocked swabs and nasopharyngeal wash collection methods for respiratory virus detection in hospitalized children using real-time polymerase chain reaction HHS Public Access

Answer: False

Question: Paragraph: bioRxiv preprint 2 this study, we developed a Bats-Hosts-Reservoir-People transmission network model for simulating the potential transmission from the infection source (probable be bats) to the human infection. Since the Bats-Hosts-Reservoir network was hard to explore clearly and public concerns were focusing on the transmission from a seafood market (reservoir) to people, we simplified the model as Reservoir-People transmission network model. The basic reproduction number (R 0 ) was calculated from the RP model to assess the transmissibility of the 2019-nCoV.
Title: A mathematical model for simulating the transmission of Wuhan novel Coronavirus

Answer:
False