Sentence 1: Imagine that--fighting and divisiveness in an election.

Sentence 2: The parties are getting along well in the election.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: no

Question:
These laws are uncoordinated and often inconsistent.

Does it follow that "The laws are usually inconsistent and uncoordinated."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
yes

Q: If I felt Wilson was sometimes too complacent in seeing human foibles (such as irrational spiritual beliefs) as evolutionarily adaptive., can we say that "Wilson didn't speak up about human problems"?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A: yes

Premise:
"Take time to see beyond the streets filled with traffic and you will be amply rewarded."
Hypothesis: You should stick to the streets with traffic because there's nothing worth seeing outside of them.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

no

input question: Do you think you can fool them by leaving the car? If this premise is true, does that tell us:"Leaving the car probably won't fool them."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: it is not possible to tell

Q: If Still, nothing about the man-shaped thing before me seemed the slightest bit fake., can we say that "The man in front of me seemed as real as any other person."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A:
yes