A football player can be a human who tackled another human.
The question and answer are below.
Premise: "A football player in a blue jersey being tackled from behind by an opponent in a white jersey."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A human tackling." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
yes
If the boy is in an over-sized dress shirt then he cannot be shirtless.
The question and answer are below.
Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "A boy in an over-sized dress shirt sits outside a shop next to a pile of new sandals."
Hypothesis: "A boy is shirtless."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
no
The man is not simultaneously shirtless and wearing a winter parka.. So what could be the question?
Question followed by answer: Given the sentence "A shirtless blond man spray paints graffiti on a wall." can we conclude that "The man was wearing a winter parka."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
no
A market inside a building can't also be an outdoor market along a fence.
The question and answer are below.
Can we conclude from "A big outdoor market along a fence." that "The big market is located inside a building."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
no
When a family is walking in woods they are not swimming in water. They are unable to do both activities simultaneously.
The question and answer are below.
Premise: "The family is walking in the woods."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A family is swimming." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
no
Two people does not imply couple and sit does not imply to listen to frogs.
The question and answer are below.
If "Two people sit on a dock with a sunset in the background." does that mean that "The couple listen to the frogs at dusk."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
it is not possible to tell