Problem: Megan, a sophomore in college, is visiting her grandparents who live out of town. There is a party going on at her grandparents' house because her grandma, Emily, has just retired. There is cake and ice cream and people are talking about their jobs, and Emily is talking about all the good and bad memories she has from her work. Who is more likely to die to complications from an illness?

A: Emily
Problem: Given the question: Drought is major concern in the Midwest. To confront the problem scientists are trying to develop drought-resistant crops. To that end, they took a plant that was not exposed to drought. They labeled it as plant A. Then they took a similar plant, and repeatedly exposed it to drought. They labeled it as plant B. They wanted to find out what makes a plant drought-resistant. Which plant would function worse with less water, plant A or plant B?
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
The answer is:
plant A
input question: Two friends studied permaculture together. Bill studied about mycorrhiza, while Red studied about hugel kultur. Which friend learned less about fungus colonizing the roots of a host plant by growing into the root cells????
output answer: Red
Thanks to environmental initiatives, Quebec has grown a large number of forests recently that are densely populated with tall trees. At the same time, Ottawa has been cutting down large numbers of trees in their forests and clearing the land to make room for housing developments and new construction sites. Which city, Quebec or Ottawa, has a greater capacity to absorb carbon dioxide from the environment?
----
Answer: Quebec
Q: Nicaragua is one of the most biodiverse countries in the Americas. They boast over five hundred species of birds, and thousands of species of plants. Across the pond in England the situation is completely different. Centuries of extensive farming, industrialization, and urban sprawls have made it one of the least biodiverse place on Earth. Would Nicaragua see less or more biomass production than England?
A: more
[Q]: The country of Qatar is opulent, to say the least. They have one of the highest per capita income in the world - exceeding that of Western Europe and North America. Over-consumption is the way of life in Qatar. While similarly small country of Bhutan puts emphasis on the happiness of its citizens in a different way. Bhutan does not give way to material over-consumption like Qatar does - it cares about its citizens' spiritual and social well-being. Would resource use in Bhutan most likely outpace or not outpace ecosystem sustainability?
****
[A]:
not outpace