Q: FYI - Let's talk. I am already booked for Tuesday AM - could you attend and would you want to? Let's talk before getting back to Margaret. --Sally
Propose a subject line
A: MEETING ON GLOBAL INFO COMMUNICATION
IN: I'm getting my head above water WRT the demand letters we sent in early March and all the associated fallout from those letters. Preparing for our next move to bring in more cash. We can send more demand letters for Mar02 non-paid invoices (don't know yet how many there are) and/or pursue default interest payments associated w/ the previous demand letter payments. Sara and Angelo, let's get together to plot out our next actions. I'll set up a meeting.

Generate a subject line.

OUT: New Round of Demand Letters?
IN: This is an email
Paul: Here's additional info for the "curtailment" data that we're pulling together. Utility Pricing for Core Gas Customers Prior to the month in question, the utility forecasts gas prices based on NYMEX monthly prices. So for example, based on November's forecast, the utility sets prices to be charged to core consumers in December. When December's over, the utility compares forecast prices with actual prices. If the forecast was too low, and there's an undercollection, the utility will increase January's price forecast by "just enough" to make up for the December undercollection. If prices were too high and there's an overcollection, the utility will reduce January price forecast by just enough to refund the overcollection. If the overcollection/undercollection is very large, the utilities have generally spread out the "true-up" over several months to avoid "rate shock" one way or the other. However, under the current circumstances, the utilities may be less willing to spread it out, and may wish to recover the entire undercollection in the following month. In short, there's at least a one-month lag in customer prices to account for differences in forecasts versus actual.

What is the subject?

OUT: Pricing for CA IOU's Core Gas Customers
QUESTION: Art, Enclosed you will please find our SEC 13 Filing for ECT Investments, Inc. as of 12/31/01, due for submission on 2/14/02. Please prepare for filing. We are filing zero positions. As soon as you get back to me I will approve for the 2/14/02 submission. You may call me at 713-853-3210 if you have any questions. Please send Bowne's bill to my attention at 1400 Smith Street, EB 3066d, Houston TX 70002-7361 Regards,
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: SEC 13f filing for ECT Investments Inc. as of 12/31/01, submission due 2/14/02
We have received the following financial Master Agreement: Type of Contract: ISDA Master Agreement (Multicurrency-Cross Border) Effective Date: March 9, 2001 Enron Entity: Enron North America Corp. Counterparty: Catequil Overseas Partners Ltd. Transactions Covered: Approved for all products with the exception of: Foreign Exchange Confirming Entity: Enron North America Corp. Governing Law: New York Special Handling Requirement: Counterparty has five (5) Local Business Days after a confirmation was effectively received by it to accept or dispute a confirmation. Copies will be distributed.
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: Catequil Overseas Partners Ltd.
Good morning. I'm looking for a confidentiality agreement between ENA and Peoples Energy Resources on or around Nov. 23, 1999. Can either of you help me? Thanks,
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer:
ENA/Peoples CA