Question:
Based on the premise "Clearly, some amount of stock compensation makes sense in order to tie the interests of the shareholders with the interests of top executives; however, the amount and structure are both important to ensure equity and avoid perverse incentives to maximize value in the short-term at the expense of the longer-term.", can we conclude that "Shareholders are impossible to have their interests tied through stock compensation."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
no

Question: Sentence A: A short walk over the hill brings you to Krassi Beach, renowned as a nude beach and renamed Banana Beach by local people, for obvious reasons!

Sentence B: You are required to wear clothing at Banana Beach.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question: The Gupta empire began to crumble in the fifth century, with the onslaught of the so-called White Huns.
The Gupta were overpowered by the so-called White Huns.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Problem: Here is a premise:
King handed it over during a papal audience.

Here is a hypothesis:
A papal audience watched the king.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Sentence 1: spend a lot of time on the house and out in the yard and things but um i like to keep up to date too um i guess

Sentence 2: The house is dilapidated and nobody maintains it.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: no

Premise:
"um most of the lawyer programs like uh Law And Order"
Hypothesis: Lawyer programs are nothing like Law and Order.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
no