Premise:
"In addition to seeing one of Caleornia's original missions, you'll want to visit this valley to see the movie studios."
Hypothesis: You would probably want to also visit this valley and take a peek into the movie studios.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

yes

input question: But Time 's Joel Stein says that Gary Sinise's nuanced portrayal of Wallace redeems the series. If this premise is true, does that tell us:"Stein says Sinise did a great portrayal of Wallace."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: yes

Question:
Based on the premise "yeah it's really it's really sad because they're they're not doing anything well we're getting off the subject i guess but just like with housing i mean they're not doing anything about pollution they're not doing anything about it's going to look like Houston have you ever been to Houston", can we conclude that "They are not making any attempt to address pollution."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
yes

Question: Sentence A: you know so i think they're screwed up there

Sentence B: They should have never done that in the first place.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question: It was on this hill that Jesus gave his famous Sermon on the Mount (Matthew 5:2-12) and also chose his disciples.
On this hill, there is more information about the Sermon of Mounts and Jesus' disciples.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Problem: Here is a premise:
Why, yes.

Here is a hypothesis:
Why, no.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer:
no