In this task, you are given text for US Congressional and California state bills, your task is to generate a summary for this bill.

Let me give you an example: SECTION 1. LIABILITY OF BUSINESS ENTITIES PROVIDING USE OF FACILITIES
TO NONPROFIT ORGANIZATIONS.

(a) Definitions.--In this section:
(1) Business entity.--The term ''business entity'' means a
firm, corporation, association, partnership, consortium, joint
venture, or other form of enterprise.
(2) Facility.--The term ''facility'' means any real
property, including any building, improvement, or appurtenance.
(3) Gross negligence.--The term ''gross negligence'' means
voluntary and conscious conduct by a person with knowledge (at
the time of the conduct) that the conduct is likely to be
harmful to the health or well-being of another person.
(4) Intentional misconduct.--The term ''intentional
misconduct'' means conduct by a person with knowledge (at the
time of the conduct) that the conduct is harmful to the health
or well-being of another person.
(5) Nonprofit organization.--The term ''nonprofit
organization'' means--
(A) any organization described in section 501(c)(3)
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and exempt from
tax under section 501(a) of such Code; or
(B) any not-for-profit organization organized and
conducted for public benefit and operated primarily for
charitable, civic, educational, religious, welfare, or
health purposes.
(6) State.--The term ''State'' means each of the several
States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto
Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, the Northern
Mariana Islands, any other territory or possession of the
United States, or any political subdivision of any such State,
territory, or possession.
(b) Limitation on Liability.--
(1) In general.--Subject to subsection (c), a business
entity shall not be subject to civil liability relating to any
injury or death occurring at a facility of the business entity
in connection with a use of such facility by a nonprofit
organization if--
(A) the use occurs outside of the scope of business
of the business entity;
(B) such injury or death occurs during a period
that such facility is used by the nonprofit
organization; and
(C) the business entity authorized the use of such
facility by the nonprofit organization.
(2) Application.--This subsection shall apply--
(A) with respect to civil liability under Federal
and State law; and
(B) regardless of whether a nonprofit organization
pays for the use of a facility.
(c) Exception for Liability.--Subsection (b) shall not apply to an
injury or death that results from an act or omission of a business
entity that constitutes gross negligence or intentional misconduct,
including any misconduct that--
(1) constitutes a crime of violence (as that term is
defined in section 16 of title 18, United States Code) or act
of international terrorism (as that term is defined in section
2331 of title 18) for which the defendant has been convicted in
any court;
(2) constitutes a hate crime (as that term is used in the
Hate Crime Statistics Act (28 U.S.C. 534 note));
(3) involves a sexual offense, as defined by applicable
State law, for which the defendant has been convicted in any
court; or
(4) involves misconduct for which the defendant has been
found to have violated a Federal or State civil rights law.
(d) Superseding Provision.--
(1) In general.--Subject to paragraph (2) and subsection
(e), this Act preempts the laws of any State to the extent that
such laws are inconsistent with this Act, except that this Act
shall not preempt any State law that provides additional
protection from liability for a business entity for an injury
or death with respect to which conditions under subparagraphs
(A) through (C) of subsection (b)(1) apply.
(2) Limitation.--Nothing in this Act shall be construed to
supersede any Federal or State health or safety law.
(e) Election of State Regarding Nonapplicability.--This Act shall
not apply to any civil action in a State court against a business
entity in which all parties are citizens of the State if such State
enacts a statute--
(1) citing the authority of this subsection;
(2) declaring the election of such State that this Act
shall not apply to such civil action in the State; and
(3) containing no other provision.
The answer to this example can be: Shields a business entity from civil liability relating to any injury or death occurring at a facility of that entity in connection with a use of such facility by a nonprofit organization if: (1) the use occurs outside the scope of business of the business entity; (2) such injury or death occurs during a period that such facility is used by such organization; and (3) the business entity authorized the use of such facility by the organization.
Makes this Act inapplicable to an injury or death that results from an act or omission of a business entity that constitutes gross negligence or intentional misconduct, including misconduct that: (1) constitutes a hate crime or a crime of violence or act of international terrorism for which the defendant has been convicted in any court; or (2) involves a sexual offense for which the defendant has been convicted in any court or misconduct for which the defendant has been found to have violated a Federal or State civil rights law.
Preempts State laws to the extent that such laws are inconsistent with this Act, except State law that provides additional protection from liability. Specifies that this Act shall not be construed to supersede any Federal or State health or safety law.
Makes this Act inapplicable to any civil action in a State court against a business entity in which all parties are citizens of the State if such State, citing this Act's authority and containing no other provision, enacts a statute declaring the State's election that this Act shall not apply to such action in the State.
Here is why: This Bill focuses on shielding business entities from civil liability relating to an injury or death depending on the conditions of injury, hence the generated summary is correct.

OK. solve this:
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ''10th Amendment Regulatory Reform
Act''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

The Congress finds:
(1) The 10th article of amendment to the Constitution of
the United States (hereinafter in this section referred to as
the ''10th Amendment'') , ratified on December 15, 1791,
states, ''The powers not delegated to the United States by the
Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved
to the States respectively, or to the people.''.
(2) The 10th Amendment expressly limits the powers of the
Federal Government to those delegated by the Constitution and
reaffirms and protects the freedom of the States to exercise
those that are not.
(3) The 10th Amendment reflects the opposition of the
Founding Fathers to a Federal Government with expansive powers;
their intention for the powers of the States to act as a check
on those of the Federal Government; and their concern that the
Federal Government would attempt to usurp powers intended to
remain with the States.
(4) James Madison, in The Federalist No. 45, wrote, ''The
powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the Federal
Government are few and defined. Those which are to remain in
the State governments are numerous and indefinite.''.
(5) The Supreme Court, in United States v. Sprague, 282
U.S. 716 (1931), noted, ''The Tenth Amendment was intended to
confirm the understanding of the people at the time the
Constitution was adopted, that powers not granted to the United
States were reserved to the States or to the people.''.
(6) The Supreme Court, in Fry v. United States, 421 U.S.
542 (1975), also noted, ''The Amendment expressly declares the
constitutional policy that Congress may not exercise power in a
fashion that impairs the States' integrity or their ability to
function effectively in a federal system.''.
(7) The Executive Departments and Agencies of the Federal
Government often promulgate regulations contrary to the spirit
and letter of the 10th Amendment.
(8) The 10th Amendment assures that the people of the
United States of America and each sovereign State in the Union
of States, now have, and have always had, rights the Federal
Government may not usurp.
(9) It is the responsibility of Congress to safeguard the
10th Amendment and to recognize that it is as vital and
valuable today as on the date of its ratification.

SEC. 3. SPECIAL STANDING FOR CERTAIN STATE OFFICIALS TO CHALLENGE
FEDERAL RULEMAKING AS A VIOLATION OF THE 10TH AMENDMENT.

(a) To Submit a Legal Brief.--During any period when a proposed
Federal rule is required under chapter 5, title 5, United States Code,
to be open for public comment, any designated State official may file
with the head of the agency proposing the rule a legal brief
challenging the constitutionality of the proposed rule under the 10th
article of amendment to the Constitution.
(b) Duty of Federal Official To Post Link to the Brief.--The head
of the Federal agency proposing the rule shall prominently post on the
agency's primary Web page, in such a manner that it is immediately
noticeable to those who visit that Web site, a link to each brief
submitted under subsection (a).
(c) Response by Federal Agency.--Unless the Federal agency
determines not to carry into effect the proposed rule, not later than
15 days after posting the link under subjection (a), the head of that
agency shall--
(1) certify in writing that, in the opinion of that head,
such rulemaking does not violate the 10th article of amendment
to the Constitution and include in that certification a full
and complete written statement of the legal reasoning
supporting that opinion; and
(2) prominently post the certification on the front page of
the agency's Web site next to the legal briefs pertaining to
that rule posted under subsection (b).
(d) Notice to Other States' Officials.--Not later than 15 days
after a designated State official submits a brief under this section,
the head of the agency proposing the rule shall give notice to each
designated State official of each State that the brief was filed.
(e) Venue and Jurisdiction of Legal Actions by State Officials.--If
a designated State official decides to commence legal action against a
proposed or final Federal rule on the grounds that the rule violates
the 10th article of amendment to the Constitution, in addition to any
other venue or jurisdiction that may be provided by law, the official
may elect to file the action in the United States district court for
the district in which the official's place of business is located,
which shall be a proper venue for the case and the court shall have
jurisdiction to hear and determine it.
(f) Expedited Appeal.--Upon the request of a designated State
official who is a party in the case, the relevant United States Court
of Appeals shall grant expedited review of a decision by a district
court in any case that could have been brought under subsection (e).
(g) Definitions.--As used in this section--
(1) the term ''designated State official'' means, with
respect to a State--
(A) the chief executive of the State;
(B) the lieutenant governor or equivalent officer
of the State;
(C) the chief legal officer of the State; or
(D) a legislative leader of the State and
(2) the term ''legislative leader'' means a speaker,
majority leader, or minority leader, of the State legislature
or any House thereof.
Answer:
10th Amendment Regulatory Reform Act - Authorizes a designated state official to file with the head of a federal agency proposing a rule, during the period when the proposed rule is required to be open for public comment, a legal brief challenging the constitutionality of the rule under the Tenth Amendment.

Directs the agency head: (1) to notify the designated official of each state within 15 days after such a brief is filed; (2) to post prominently on the agency's primary Web page a link to the brief; and (3) within 15 days after posting such link, to certify in writing that such rulemaking does not violate the Tenth Amendment and post the certification prominently on the front page of the agency's website, unless the agency determines it will not put the proposed rule into effect.

Authorizes a state official who decides to challenge a federal rule on the grounds that it violates the Tenth Amendment to elect to file a legal action in U.S. district court for the district in which the official's place of business is located. Directs the relevant U.S. Court of Appeals, at the request of a designated state official, to grant expedited review of a decision by a district court in such a case.