Sorry for my hold up on this list. I had an issue with the division/dba approvals that I needed to resolve with Dave Forster and Mark Taylor. We will be issuing a policy (as soon as I draft it) about how to deal with divisions/dba's in the future. For this Koch counterparty: Per my conversation with Stephanie, I am provisionally approving this counterparty only with understanding that the online trading account name gets amended to read as follows: Koch Industries, Inc., acting through its Koch Hydrocarbon Company Division. If the counterparty will not agree to this name change on its account let me know, I will talk to the Koch lawyer. (FYI, this is the way we styled the ISDA Master Agreement, at the direction of the Koch lawyer.)
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: Counterparty Approval List for 5/4/00
Jennifer: I got a call from Chris Bailey (sp?) needing a summary of California dereg for a presentation(s) that Harold's assembling. Attached is summary that Mona pulled together for Harold a couple of months ago. I don't have Chris' email address (I've left him a message). Could you forward this along to him? Thanks a bunch. Best,
Answer: California Deregulation Summary
Here is an email: Rick, as a followup to our conversation about a month ago I just want to summarize where we are on the sale of EOGIL and the steps we are taking for corporate approvals as we move toward closing. We are currently anticipating project close on July 27th, but as with all things associated with India the date will probably slide some. Here'e what we are planning to do for Corp approval. 1) Steve Harper is working with Brad Larson to get a RAC document completed along the lines of the package we prepared for the China sale last month. This should be completed early next week and either your group or Steve will get it circulated for sign-offs. 2) We (Detmering/Sherrick) will review the project with Skilling/Lay prior to Rac sign-off. Based on our last discussion, we will not need board approval for this sale since it is less than $500 million. If this is not correct, let me know ASAP. Otherwise, we will do the above and plan to close on July 27th. Thanks
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: Sale of India E&P --EOGIL
Q: To all, I visited with Kam earlier today to revisit the positions in the SE book and we discovered the following: City of Madison transport: transfer to Pete's book for 10/01 and forward MGAF transport: write down 2007-2020 position. Loss of about $500K - Scott as we spoke, I'll take the blame LRC/Stringray positions: Kam to review and explain Annuity: Origination total of about 90K, net with 500 loss from above Alagasco: Tammi deal, Sonat Tier 2 position Others: As I explained to Kam, any gain from closing this book should be transferred for the account of Jared Kaiser Bank of America ABA 0011.....just kidding! It comes from sitting by Sandra too long. Kam - thanks for your help and let me know if you need my help. As well, please reply if I have not covered all issues. Regards,
Propose a subject line
A: SE Book
IN: I knew we would have to address this eventually. CES is long 3600/month in TGT Z4 at CG&E. I showed them a $2.66 bid for tomorrow. Before I had worked up the price, CES decided to take the gas into CGAS at Lebanon. This gets real messy. Is there any way we can refuse this? At first, I was thinking we would have to do this. Now, I don't like the idea because it will be really messy in the summer.

Generate a subject line.

OUT: CES moving deals
IN: This is an email
This email is to update you on the status of the 2001 ISDA Master Agreement Protocol (the "Protocol"). As part of the Protocol, there were four annexes that addressed the disappearance of the 12 national currency units on January 1, 2002 and the introduction of the euro. These four annexes have been separated from the Protocol and published on our website on September 24 as the 2001 Euro Protocol. The adherence period for the 2001 Euro Protocol is September 24 to November 30, 2001. It was important to move forward with the 2001 Euro Protocol, given the specific nature of the timing of the introduction of the euro. With respect to Annexes 1 through 8, we propose drafting a new ISDA Master Agreement rather than moving forward with a Protocol. The continuing debate on the details of Annexes 1 to 8, the relevance of the Protocol for these provisions and the interest in moving forward with a new ISDA Master Agreement are some of the reasons for this recommendation. An extraordinary amount of effort has gone into preparing the Protocol and will provide a strong basis for proceeding with a new ISDA Master Agreement. Please let me know what your thoughts are on this suggested approach. With respect to Annex 9, the Force Majeure Annex, we propose posting a Form of Amendment and the Force Majeure provisions (as well as the Commentary) on our website. This would allow firms to incorporate such language into their Master Agreements on the basis of bilateral negotiation. Any views you may have in light of the events of September 11 would be welcome. Lastly, with respect to Annex 10, the Tax Protocol, our Tax Committee will be contacted on Tuesday to determine how to proceed with respect to those issues. Any views on this issue would also be welcome.

What is the subject?

OUT:
2001 ISDA Master Agreement Protocol