Premise:
"Bean catalogue."
Hypothesis: Bean catalogue.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

yes

input question: It also points out that the rule imposes no affirmative compliance actions by any entities to which it applies. If this premise is true, does that tell us:"The rule does impose affirmative compliance actions."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: no

Question:
Based on the premise "wow how about that that i'm not quite as mechanically inclined although that some of the the basic things that you need to do for uh the maintenance of your warranty on a vehicle", can we conclude that "I have to take my vehicle to a mechanic to complete the needed work."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
it is not possible to tell

Question: Sentence A: The agency, which gets more than half of its $5 million budget from the LSC, will lose $525,000, said executive director Joseph Bartylak.

Sentence B: Previously, the agency was receiving a budget of roughly $1 million from the LSC.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question: Let the hall be cleared.
Move the furniture out of the hall.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Problem: Here is a premise:
It concluded, Japan cannot afford to stand idly China's difficulties make ours look small in comparison.

Here is a hypothesis:
Japan should simply stand to the side and do nothing.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer:
no