Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.

Q: Oh YIPPEE, the progressive like a total liar and traitor who should be behind bars. Oh well it wont make it past Trump.

A: Yes
****
Q: Wish this information from your January 14th article had been brought forward to this update:

" This year's policy debate topic focuses on domestic surveillance by the federal government. For half of their rounds, debaters are assigned to argue for reducing surveillance. During the other half, debaters will argue for maintaining present levels of surveillance"

The subject of a debate should always be part of a real news story. Obviously, if it is extemporaneous debate, that isn't possible. Here, you had the information two months ago and just lost it between article and update.

A: No
****
Q: Thank you for writing this piece and putting out the facts in context. Much appreciated. While the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge is the current "thorn in our paw" over public lands my hope is that folks understand that it is just a small, but painful element of a much larger plan to wrest away our public lands to allow exploitation. That it is being done with lies about our US Constitution and our Founding Fathers is appalling and should anger all of us. If the militias and protesters are so anxious to deal with "tyrants" and those destroying the promise of America they have only to look at the forces bent on stealing our lands for exploitation and buying our political system. Thanks again for arguing for lawfulness and reminding citizens that our public lands legacy is on the line.

A:
No
****