instruction:
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
question:
We cant trust people who change ethical positions to stay in power. #whichjulesbailey #whichtedwheeler We would have wasted $10 Billion as estimated by Joe Cortright who is quoted as an expert on this. ODOT also used the endless lies used by Bailey. All the lies and roll vall listed here.. http://tinyurl.com/csatalking
answer:
Yes

question:
"Political reality" is much more than just reverting to a rhetorical slogan. I would've figured that you knew that already based on most of your comments relating to things you that you support. There is over 85 synonyms for 'incongruent.' Take your pick, they are all correct.
answer:
No

question:
I understand where you are coming from. I assume with my hypothetical question that you would not recommend recusing Carlson if your client was charged with a felony assault on a gay man. Reasonable minds might disagree with your position. But if your test is as you say: whether the judge gets reversed a lot on denying suppression motions or for other errors and more than his peers, then I expect you would not be trying many cases in Carlson's court since his record for reversals was far more than any other judge during his tenure trying criminal and domestic cases. But since such refusals are so opaque as you suggested how would anyone know your reasons? You may have the last word. I have concluded.
answer:
No