QUESTION: Premise: "A couple are sitting in a brown chair."
Hypothesis: "A couple lays on a bed."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Let's solve it slowly: A couple cannot sit in a chair and lay on a bed at the same time.
The answer is no.

[QUESTION] Premise: "Two young men are standing on the sidewalk talking to each other."
Hypothesis: "Two men are talking to one another."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Two young men and two men refer to the same people. Talking to one another is paraphrasing talking to each other.
The answer is yes.

Q: Given the sentence "A little boy in a red outfit is on a man's shoulders." can we conclude that "A boy are sitting on a sofa."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
A: A boy cannot be on the sofa if he is on a man's shoulders.
The answer is no.

QUESTION: Can we conclude from "A man is standing on the side of the road in a downtown area with a grill and a complete set-up." that "Making food for people who pass by."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell

Let's solve it slowly: Man jumping onto a horse for a ride through the countryside.
The answer is no.

[QUESTION] Can we conclude from "A woman in a office has just won a piece of candy from a small table top crane game." that "A woman tried to catch the candy."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
There may be more than one way to win candy from a table top crane game then just trying to catch it.
The answer is it is not possible to tell.

Q: Test for natural language inference.
Premise: "An overhead view of a racing motorcycle."
Hypothesis: "A motorcycle is visible."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
A:
If there is an overhead view of a motorcycle then the motorcycle is visible.
The answer is yes.