input question: There was certainly nothing of the policeman about them. If this premise is true, does that tell us:"They might have been impersonating police."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: it is not possible to tell

Question:
Based on the premise "and you know the last i heard it was costing ten twenty thirty thousand dollars a year uh to keep these guys waiting", can we conclude that "I don't know how much you have to pay per year."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
no

Question: Sentence A: The Crusaders established a feudal Christian state with Godfrey at its head.

Sentence B: Godfrey was happy to lead the Crusaders.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question: The analyses use both quantifiable and general descriptions of the effects of the rule on small entities as required by section 607 and numerous small entities participated in the rulemaking as required by section 609 by submitting comments on the proposed rule and by attending an open public meeting in August 1995 and the September 1995 meeting of the Good Manufacturing Practice Advisory Committee.
Quantifiable descriptions of how the rule will affect small entities is utilized by the analyses.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Problem: Here is a premise:
He could do nothing, and their demands were impossible.

Here is a hypothesis:
He could do a number of things.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question:
but but see they make that clear to them as they hire those guys what the what the drug testing schedule is they say we we're testing you tomorrow and we'll test you every three months thereafter while you work here

Does it follow that "So long as drug testing isn't random, it's completely fair."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
it is not possible to tell