Given a paragraph and a claim, classify it this way: If the claim contradicts the evidence present in the paragraph, classify the claim as '0'. If the claim has multiple supporting *AND* contradicting evidences, classify the claim as '1'. If the claim has supporting evidence and the paragraph is in overall favor of the claim, then classify the claim as '2'.

Input: Consider Input: Paragraph: In May 2016,photographs and messages reproduced above began circulating on Facebookalong with claims thatlurking underneath labels ofpricey salon-brand hair products purchased through discount retailers were cheaper, lower quality brands. PhotographsshowtheCHI line of hair care products with T.J. Maxx price tag and the label half peeled away to showabottle bearing a less expensive (and presumably lower-quality) hair care product. Most versionsof the claim included an assertion that salon-brand hair products should only be bought at hair salons, not discount retailers. The rumors served as a tacit criticism ofsalon clientele who purchase productfrom third parties rather thanfrom salons or stylists (who would earn commission and meet salon sales goals otherwise). A similar social media rumormaintained thateyelash extensionscan cause "lash lice," a story spreadprimarily by multi-level marketing salespeople hawkingmascara. In another instance, salons and stylists spread a rumor that Pantene (one of the top-selling drugstore hair care brands) can beflammable in combination with popular hair-lightening treatments. Both rumors began with or were passed alongby peopleinvested in the sale of competing products at full price. T.J. Maxx saidthat the CHI products depicted were genuine: At T.J. Maxx, conducting our business with integrity means everything to us and we take pride in offering our customers great values on high quality brand-name products. We have looked into your concerns and can assure you that the contents of the bottle are authentic and are as described on the outer label. We have also confirmed with our supplier that its relabeling of the bottle was appropriate. We thank you for your ongoing patronage of our stores. CHI also responded our questionsabout the photographs. The company explained that the labeling was due in partto manufacturing fluctuations, as well as cutting back on unnecessary waste: Recently, several of our customers have noticed cans of CHI®️ products with labels covering up other products. We sincerely wish to clear up any confusion. The Egyptian Oil and French Oil and other cans you may have seen were originally another CHI®️ product brand we manufactured. Due to a legal challenge that arose concerning the new brand names and designs, we were forced to cease production. As a result of this, we were left with many empty cylinders. To avoid them taking up vital space in our warehouse but most importantly, adding unnecessary waste to landfills, we decided to uphold our environmentally conscious efforts that we have maintained since 1986. We felt we made the right decision by placing original CHI®️ labels over these cylinders and filling them with our CHI®️ formulas. Therefore, the product is authentically made by Farouk Systems with the correct CHI®️ label on them and product inside. We sincerely apologize for any confusion this may have caused our customers. One of the two viral photographs didn't display a T.J. Maxx or Marshall's price tag, strongly suggestingthat the relabeledbottles were indeed notrestricted to non-salon retail environments. CHI's statement affirmedthe relabeled bottleswere in no way different than any other from the brand, whether purchased in a salon or a discount department store. In this instance, both the retailer and the manufacturer said thatthe product packaging was simply repurposed, but the contents remain authentic and identical to products sold in salons and other non-discount retail environments. (In instances where counterfeiting occurs, the companybeing impersonatedis typically the first to object to dilution of their brand.) Claim: Retailers T.J. Maxx and Marshall's sell counterfeit salon products.

Output: 0

Input: Consider Input: Paragraph: The patient likely contracted meningitis at the downtown club on Saturday, officials said. The KitKatClub is renowned for its sexually uninhibited techno parties that draw visitors from around the world. City authorities issued a warning this week after being alerted to the Berlin patron's exposure to the disease, urging all others who were at the club at the time to consult with a doctor. Bacterial meningitis can be spread via saliva and close body contact. Common symptoms are strong headaches, high fever, a stiff neck, dizziness and weakness. The disease can become life-threatening within hours. In a statement on its home page, the club itself said that "while infections in the club were very unlikely according to doctors and authorities ... anybody suffering from symptoms should immediately see a doctor." The club said that none of its employees had shown any symptoms so far, but all had been offered antibiotics as a preventive measure. City officials said there was no need to shut down the club because it wasn't the source of infection, and the site itself was not contaminated. Claim: Berlin nightclub patrons urged to get meningitis test.

Output: 2

Input: Consider Input: Paragraph: Several now-viral videos posted to Twitter, Facebook, and TikTok in May 2020 showed small insects crawling along the outside of strawberries after the fruit had been soaked in a saltwater solution. Collectively, the videos received hundreds of thousands of views and sparked many questions about the methodology. Social media users filled a bowl with water and table salt. Once the salt had dissolved, strawberries were said to have been submerged in the solution for "about 30 minutes" after which point small "worms" could be seen crawling around the outside of the berry. WAIT FOR IT Still trying to think happy thoughts today. #fyp #foryou #strawberrieswithbugs #bugsinstrawberries #rednoseday #got2bhome original sound callmekristatorres Though it is true that strawberries and other fruit may house small insects and the saltwater method is largely used by the agricultural industry as a way to detect such infestations, entomological experts at Oregon State University told Snopes that there is no scientific evidence that suggests a saltwater solution can, in fact, force pests out from infested berries. The insect in question is an invasive flying pest called spotted wing drosophila (SWD), or Drosophila suzukii. Endemic to Asia, SWD was first detected in North America in California in 2008 and has since spread to many regions of the United States where the insects are known to infect fruit crops and berries, according to Michigan State University (MSU). Female flies lay their eggs in fruit where they will ultimately hatch into a delectable habitat prime for larval feeding. If the pest is not controlled through mitigation measures, MSU adds that it is possible fruit may be harvested with larvae inside. Despite a lack of published scientific evidence, the saltwater method is one most often employed by commercial growers in order to determine whether an SWD infestation has occurred, but berry lovers of any sort can also use it to detect creepy crawlies. Claim: A saltwater solution will force insect pests out of infested strawberries.
Output: 1