The boy is either pointing at a tulip or hitting his sister.
The question and answer are below.
Premise: "A boy in red is pointing to a red tulip."
Hypothesis: "The boy is hitting his sister."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
no
Battling for the puck is the same as playing for the puck.
The question and answer are below.
Given the sentence "Ice hockey players battling for the puck around the goalie." can we conclude that "Ice hockey players are playing for the puck."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
yes
A group of teenagers and children with backpacks congregates in the grass under a tree does not indicate that they are looking for money on the ground.. So what could be the question?
Question followed by answer: Given the sentence "A group of teenagers and children with backpacks congregates in the grass under a tree." can we conclude that "A group of backpackers looking for money on the ground."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
it is not possible to tell
A man standing on his hands does not imply the man is an acrobat.
The question and answer are below.
Premise: "A man is standing on his hands with lots of people around him."
Hypothesis: "The acrobat is performing for the crowd."
Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
it is not possible to tell
A skateboarder sliding on a rail may not always do so for showing off.
The question and answer are below.
Premise: "A skateboarder sliding on a rail."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A skateboarder shows off." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
it is not possible to tell
They cannot be on a trampoline and in a ball pit at the same time.
The question and answer are below.
If "Children playing on a trampoline." does that mean that "Children are in a ball pit."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
no