In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.
Example: Comment: President lied under oath about consensual sex...
Not the same thing as rape.
Example solution: Sexual-explicit
Example explanation: This comment explicitly mentions "consensual sex" and "rape", and thus is sexual-explicit.

Problem: Comment: .

Hart and Brennan having to risk becoming bloodless martyrs by going to jail in the defense of the seal ? ? ?

Jail them!
...They in fact, "do have the BLOOD of RAPED Children on their hands ALREADY. Simply because, "many Raped children commit suicide or die of drug overdoses and for those who do survive live a SHATTERED EXISTENCE in TORMENTED SILENCE".

Obviously, Australia sees a NEED to enact Laws to close up Loopholes in order to better Protect its own Citizens especially the Most Vulnerable.

If Hart and Brennan choose to put themselves above the laws of a Sovereign country(and I Believe they already do), their fate is sealed.

As for Francis, "don't bother with listening to his wonderful words. A GOOD look at his Track Record in Argentina & Failed Commission Speaks Volumes."

.
Solution: Sexual-explicit