Standing underneath a sign does not imply he is on the sidewalk.
The question and answer are below.
If "A man in a brown shirts standing underneath the sign for a clothing store." does that mean that "The man is standing on the sidewalk."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
it is not possible to tell
There is no army invading a country if there are spectators in the background watching.. So what could be the question?
Question followed by answer: Premise: "A man clad in metallic armor raises a weapon while mounted on an armor-clad horse with spectators in the background."
Hypothesis: "The man in armor is part of an army invading a country."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
no
The worker that proudly shows off his four wheeled mailbag carrier cannot be the same that throws it across the room.
The question and answer are below.
Premise: "A smiling post office worker proudly shows off his four wheeled mailbag carrier."
Hypothesis: "A snarling postal worker throws his mailbag across the room."
Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?
no
Sentences have the same meaning- a man is at a bar.
The question and answer are below.
Can we conclude from "A man in a blue shirt is in the distance at a bar." that "A man is at a bar."?
Options:
- yes
- no
- it is not possible to tell
yes
The man is either working on a building or climbing a tree.. So what could be the question?
Question followed by answer: Premise: "A man without a shirt is working on top of a building with scaffolding attached."
Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A man without a shirt is climbing a tree." is true?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
no
A BMX biker would not be a man on a skateboard.. So what could be the question?
Question followed by answer:
Given the sentence "A bmx biker shoots up into the air." can we conclude that "A man is on a skateboard."?
Options:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
no