instruction:
In this task, you will be presented with a context from an academic paper and a question separated with a
. You have to answer the question based on the context.
question:
Mathur et al. in their paper for detecting offensive tweets proposed a Ternary Trans-CNN model where they train a model architecture comprising of 3 layers of Convolution 1D having filter sizes of 15, 12 and 10 and kernel size of 3 followed by 2 dense fully connected layer of size 64 and 3. The first dense FC layer has ReLU activation while the last Dense layer had Softmax activation. They were able to train this network on a parallel English dataset provided by Davidson et al. The authors were able to achieve Accuracy of 83.9%, Precision of 80.2%, Recall of 69.8%.

The approach looked promising given that the dataset was merely 3189 sentences divided into three categories and thus we replicated the experiment but failed to replicate the results. The results were poor than what the original authors achieved. But, most of the model hyper-parameter choices where inspired from this work.
Question: What is the previous work's model?
answer:
Ternary Trans-CNN

question:
We evaluated the proposed model using the publicly available LibriSpeech ASR corpus BIBREF23. The LibriSpeech dataset consists of 970 hours of audio data with corresponding text transcripts (around 10M word tokens) and an additional 800M word token text only dataset.
Question: How big is LibriSpeech dataset?
answer:
970 hours of audio data with corresponding text transcripts (around 10M word tokens) and an additional 800M word token text only dataset

question:
Creating human-labeled training datasets for machine learning often looks like content analysis, a well-established methodology in the humanities and the social sciences (particularly literature, communication studies, and linguistics), which also has versions used in the life, ecological, and medical sciences. Content analysis has taken many forms over the past century, from more positivist methods that formally establish structural ways of evaluating content to more interpretivist methods that embrace ambiguity and multiple interpretations, such as grounded theory BIBREF16. Today, structured content analysis (also called "closed coding") is used to turn qualitative or unstructured data of all kinds into structured and/or quantitative data, including media texts, free-form survey responses, interview transcripts, and video recordings. Projects usually involve teams of "coders" (also called "annotators", "labelers", or "reviewers"), with human labor required to "code", "annotate", or "label" a corpus of items.
Question: In what sense is data annotation similar to structured content analysis?
answer:
structured content analysis (also called "closed coding") is used to turn qualitative or unstructured data of all kinds into structured and/or quantitative data Projects usually involve teams of "coders" (also called "annotators", "labelers", or "reviewers"), with human labor required to "code", "annotate", or "label" a corpus of items.