Here is an email: Michelle, Will you please review the attached and initial if you approve the way it reads? We technically hired Jo Crowder as our first hire, but didn't see the sense in paying the remaining $20K of her $50K retainer fee for someone who is at a Staff level. I've discussed this arrangement with Jane and she is in agreement. (Twanda, do you mind printing this on EGM letterhead for Michelle to initial? I'm happy to come pick it up, or you can send to me at ECN 3678a. Thanks!) Additionally, we would like to extend Jane's contract so she can continue to submit candidates to us. Her original contract ended on September 30th. We'd like to extend it for a six month term beginning October 1st, continuing through March 31st. I've spoken with Jane and she agrees that there will not be an additional retainer fee charged to us by reinstating our contract. (Diane, is this as easy as just running new executable copies of the contract, changing only the dates or would we just create a one page amendment to the existing contract for signature by all parties?). We would like to continue working with them under the same fee structure as though our contract with them never ended (i.e. our next hire will be at a 25% fee). Thanks for your help, ladies! Let me know if there's anything else I can do to assist!
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: Jane Beatty letter & contract
Here is an email: Mark and I met with Mark Haedicke regarding utilities and the need for a legal opinion from the utility counterparty. We have agreed with Mark as follows: 1. Our negotiations with investor owned utilities should be based upon our standard ISDA Schedule (ISDA Multicurrency Agreement) AND including the "Additional Termination Event". Neither party should be required to provide a legal opinion. 2. Investor owned utilites will be approved for online trading from a legal viewpoint. The extra "Additional Termination Event" paragraph is not currently included in the GTC's but COULD be incorporated if there is a revision to the online agreement. 3. Our position with respect to municipals/municipal owned utilities, federal/state/local owned utilities and cooperatives remains unchanged. We should still utilize and update the "municipal ISDA" form, and, require a legal opinion from the counterparty. In that regard, Susan Flynn has been working on an "omnibus" format for an electric co-op (Deseret Generation and Transmission Co-operative), an earlier version of which could be used as a template for a municipal omnibus confirmation.
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: Utilities (investor owned)
Here is an email: Hi Andy, How are things? I am still in Houston looking for a new home. I hope that all is well with you. Hopefully some certainty will happen with Newco in the near future. I wanted some help from you in finding a job. I know that you are very well respected in the industry so if any opportunity that may fit me comes your way could you please let me know. Thank you for everything. It was a pleasure working with you at Enron. I have attached a copy of my resume to this email. Thanks again and hope to hear from you soon,
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A:
Hi