You will be given a definition of a task first, then an example. Follow the example to solve a new instance of the task.
In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: obscene and non-obscene. A comment is obscene if it is considered offensive to the public sense of decency, for example because it too obviously relates to sex or contains language regarded as taboo in polite usage.

Comment: Damn! Another cloudy day, and it's all Obama's doing!
Solution: Obscene
Why? This is obscenity because it hints on sexual content that is offensive to the public sense of decency.

New input: Comment: If evidence is found it will not be made public at once. It will be presented to Trump, his cabinet and Congress for analysis. If the evidence is conclusive and a conspiracy is recognizable, Trump will be offered a choice between resignation - like Nixon before him - or impeachment and perhaps prison. You are correct to say that unsubstantiated allegations are not proof. These leaks come from the FBI and the intelligence community; do you really think they are on the level of Breitbart and that Jones idiot on the radio? Think logically for a minute: calls were made throughout the campaign by those close to Trump, not just Flynn - this is a fact that has been publicized. Just what do you think they were discussing? Ivanka's newest hairdo?
Solution:
Non-obscene