input question: Accumulating nonfederal financial assets, such as stocks, could be another way that government saving could translate into resources available for investment, but this idea is controversial. If this premise is true, does that tell us:"Some people think accumulating nonfederal financial assets is a bad idea for investment."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: yes

Question:
Based on the premise "okay um so uh um uh do you have any favorite teams", can we conclude that "You don't know any teams, do you?"? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
no

Question: Sentence A: She's willing to lend it to me sometimes when it's a case of working on strictly unofficial lines.

Sentence B: She never lends it to me, even when it's in an unofficial capacity.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question: get some thoughts in the meantime if i had some you know think about it ahead of time
I am still thinking of some projects that I could do.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Problem: Here is a premise:
Strychnine is, in a certain sense, a cumulative poison, but it would be quite impossible for it to result in sudden death in this way.

Here is a hypothesis:
Strychnine can under no circumstances cause death.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question:
Should I announce the arrest openly at Styles, or not?

Does it follow that "Shall I announce this arrest to the public at Styles?"?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
yes