The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the self-need strategy, otherwise output No. self-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to create a personal need for an item in the negotiation, such as by pointing out that the participant sweats a lot to show preference towards water packages.
--------
Question: Context: 'I'm fine, let's talk about how we can come to a fair deal.' 'Sure, my number one item if food if you can spare any.' 'It'd be nice if we can both get an even split right?'
Utterance: 'Well some needs are higher than others. I need more food but I can give up some firewood or water.'

Answer: No

Question: Context: 'I was just negotiating the water for now. I was trying to do one at a time.' 'ah, I'm definitely ok with doing one at a time: A 2:1 split is definitely OK with me: The issue is, if we consider each individually, it might be harder to come to a deal, but I'm happy to do it your way.' 'How about you take 1 firewood, I''l take 2 and with food, you can have 2 and I'll take one package. I have two very hungry boys!'
Utterance: 'Is there a reason you want the 2:1 split? Food my group's largest priority by a large margin (We eat a lot). It's worth a lot more to my group then the firewood would be.'

Answer: Yes

Question: Context: 'so I'll get 2 water, 3 food and 0 firewood?' 'Incorrect. ' 'In order to make it work I need at least 3 water and 2 food. Or I could do 3 firewood and 2 food and 0 water. I don't see any other way around it'
Utterance: 'It has to be fair. Right now I don't think you are being fair. The last offer I gave was great for you. You all all of the food and 2 water.You wanted 3 food in your last offer so thats a great offer I suggested.'

Answer:
No