In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Let me give you an example: Comment: President lied under oath about consensual sex...
Not the same thing as rape.
The answer to this example can be: Sexual-explicit
Here is why: This comment explicitly mentions "consensual sex" and "rape", and thus is sexual-explicit.

OK. solve this:
Comment: Has any gentle reader ever noted that progressive icons never receive even the slightest bit of criticism in the lying, globalist, progressive MSM?

Have you ever seen an AP column which criticized:

1) King's blatant plagiarizing of his "doctoral thesis?" Why do you suppose King's Ph.D. was never revoked?

2) King's serial philandering. King's admonitions to be honest and kind were pure hypocritical lies. King was anything but
honest and kind to Coretta. King indiscretely slept with any female who would have him while keeping the chaste, false, moniker of "Reverend."

3) King's fifth-column activities. Like other traitorous progressives, King actively sided with the Viet Cong and the Soviet Union during the Vietnam War.

4) King's alleged wife-beating. Police responded to allegations that Martin beat Coretta.

Should Georgia or any other state be erecting a statue to a blatant plagiarist, philanderer, hypocrite, liar, traitor, and alleged wife beater?

In a word: "No!"
Answer:
Non-sexual-explicit