Categorize the comment on the basis of obscenity. If the comment is obscene output Yes, otherwise output No.

Q: You mean spend, spend, spend like the Republican majority has been doing for the past thirty-something years; and then turn around and pass the overspending into taxes at the municipal level? Now rational voters aren't buy that it's the liberals spending and taxing that's got our state into fiscal trouble. Try again, Ridgefield.

A: No
****
Q: You're right. I hadn't considered how the right to private property and protection against unreasonable search and seizure is BS. Thanks for enlightening me.

Sarcasm aside; with a "put these idiots afoot as bear bait" and "I would do that in a heartbeat" attitude, thank you for leaving the police service. The force is better for it. The state should work to improve the situations that encourage reckless driving on the highway, but allowing police officers that much latitude doesn't respect the Constitutional right to the due process of law. You don't get to play judge and jury.

A: Yes
****
Q: Ugh. That True guy is the worst. He created some fantasy about an indigenous people steeped in Noble Savage-style racism, then ran himself to death because he didn't want to grow up. Should not be famous and definitely should not be thought of as a good example worthy of study. And the "minimalist" trend is over, now we're on to something equally stupid.

A:
Yes
****