TASK DEFINITION: Given a paragraph about movies and a set of conversational questions and answers about the paragraph, say whether the passage contains sufficient information to answer the follow-up question. Say Yes if it is answerable; otherwise, say No. The paragraph has the prefix 'CONTEXT:'. Each conversation question has a prefix 'Q:' followed by the answer prefix 'A:', and the follow-up question has a prefix 'FOLLOWUP_Q:'.
PROBLEM: CONTEXT: "She'll find out eventually" isn't good enough. Earth is in trouble right now. Captain Marvel needs to find out right now. It's unclear how much time has passed between the snap and her arrival back on Earth in Captain Marvel's post-credits scene, but she didn't get there immediately, so the sooner she found out, the sooner she would arrive. As for the 50% chance, I don't think Fury knew exactly what was happening. He doesn't appear in Infinity War until the post-credits scene, and IIRC, there's no indication he knew about Thanos or his plan to wipe out half the universe. All he knew was that, across the planet, people had started disintegrating. He had no way of knowing that Captain Marvel herself could potentially have been affected. <sep> Q: Was the pager message from Nick Fury to Captain Marvel unnecessary? A: I don't think Fury knew exactly what was happening <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Did Captain Marvel care about Earthlings?

SOLUTION: Yes

PROBLEM: CONTEXT: I'd guess the movie's motive for not introducing the McKee subplot is because that was only a minor subplot of the book. And re-telling a book story in movie form, when you've got to get all the key details on screen in just 2 or 3 hours, means you have to omit many minor details. The core story of The Great Gatsby is about Gatsby and the world he lived in, not about Nick or Nick's potential attraction to Gatsby. In book form, there is plenty of room for the subplot suggestion that Nick is gay -- and the author Fitzgerald introduced the suggestion so subtly that most readers miss it. In the movie, however, throwing "Nick might be gay" at viewers along with everything else, in just 2 or 3 hours, could overwhelm them and/or distract from the core story -- and I'm not sure how it could be done as subtly on-screen as Fitzgerald pulled it off in the prose. <sep> Q: Why did the Great Gasby (2013) movie erase the hints of Nick Carraway's homosexuality? A: I'd guess the movie's motive for not introducing the McKee subplot is because that was only a minor subplot of the book <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: Why would the writer include this subplot in the book?

SOLUTION: Yes

PROBLEM: CONTEXT: I don't know this for sure, but here is my educated guess. In this featurette they're using the word "hero" to identify the "real world" Nina. There are 2 Nina's in those shots. One is the "hero" (main character of the film, whom the audience identifies with and empathizes with) and then there's the evil reflective Nina (in one shot called the "reflective element"). There's also the green-screen element. Put all of those together, and you get the final comp (comp = composite shot, which is a shot made up of multiple elements). <sep> Q: What is a "hero plate"? A: hero" to identify the "real world" Nina Q: What is the purpose of it in film? A: One is the "hero" (main character of the film, whom the audience identifies with and empathizes with) and then there's the evil reflective Nina <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: What movie has a hero plate?

SOLUTION:
No