Q: In this task, you will be shown a prompt from a judicial decision and multiple holding statements derived from citations following text in a legal decision. Holdings represent the governing legal rule when the law is applied to a particular set of facts. There are five answer choices for each citing text. The correct answer is the holding statement that corresponds to the citing text. You should write an incorrect option. Even though there exist multiple wrong answers, we only need a single wrong answer. There is a <HOLDING> token in the position of the citing text prompt where the holding statement was extracted.
Judge. The husband, Theodore C. Rogers, appeals from an order granting the wife's motion for temporary attorney's fees and costs in a dissolution of marriage action. We reverse and remand for further proceedings. In March 2001, after approximately nineteen months of marriage, the husband filed for divorce. Shortly thereafter, the wife filed a motion for temporary attorney's fees and costs. Following an eviden-tiary hearing, the lowe CA 1997)(<HOLDING>); Meighen v. Meighen, 813 So.2d 173, 176 (Fla.
Holding statements: (A) holding that trial court did not err in imputing income to wife for purposes of child support based on the continued monthly payment of wifes living expenses by wifes mother (B) holding that trial court did not err (C) holding that it was error to impute income to wife where there was no evidence of regular periodic payments and where assistance from wifes mother was of a temporary nature during the pendency of the divorce proceedings holding that lower court properly imputed income to husband where husbands parents maderegular periodic payments that allowed parties to maintain a high standard of living (D) holding that the order on the wifes petition for modification of child support was a final order because it disposed of all the issues except for the ancillary issue of attorneys fees (E) holding that the wifes testimony outlining the family living expenses constituted evidence from which the trial court could find that the needs of the children exceed the maximum support pursuant to the guidelines
A:
holding that trial court did not err