The Southeast RTO orders are out and have followed through with what we exp= ected from the discussion at the FERC meeting. The SPP and Entergy RTO proposals have been rejected because they fail to s= atisfy the scope and configuration requirements of Order No. 2000. The Com= mission notes that the required discussions between SPP and Entergy and it= s neighboring RTO/TOs has led to no increase in the original scope and conf= iguration. The filings by SPP and Entergy were brief, indicating only a la= ck of interest by other RTOs or utilities in joining to enlarge scope; they= failed to specify any details of the talks, what changes could be made or = what could be fixed to accomodate combination with other RTOs. The order s= tates that the Commission favors the development of large, regional transmi= ssion organizations reflecting natural markets. The Commission indicates t= hat they favor four RTOs - NE, SE, MW and West. Therefore the order requir= es the participants in SPP and Entergy to participate in settlement discuss= ions as set out in the mediation order. Note that these meetings will star= t next Tuesday, July 17 before a FERC ALJ. The Southern Company RTO is also found by the FERC to fail the scope charac= teristics of Order No. 2000. The order finds that Southern's approach to f= ocus on MOUs and seams issues with its neighbors is inadequate. The order = states, "We reiterate: the Commission's goal is to have a single RTO in the= Southeast, and to have that single RTO operational as soon as possible." = The Commission recognizes that start-up costs in forming a larger RTO may b= e more, but that over the longer term, large RTOs will foster market develo= pment, will provide increased reliability and will result in lower wholesal= e electricity prices. The order therefore directs the parties to the media= tion as stated above. The Grid South participants are also directed to the mediation which is sta= rting on next Tuesday. It is a lengthier order with more details on other = aspects of RTOs, including Independent Board requirement, congestion managm= ent, interconnection procedures, planning process and CBM. Therefore, I am= attaching a summary of the order. One of the important findings of the or= der is that GridSouth is not sufficiently independent; the Applicant TOs ar= e making policy decisions that should be made by an independent board. The= refore, the order requires GridSouth to install an independent board and fi= le a compliance filing within 90 days. If anyone wants copies of the orders, let me know.
Answer: RTO Orders - Grid South, SE Trans, SPP and Entergy
Here is an email: When: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 2:00 PM-3:00 PM (GMT-06:00) Central Time (US & Canada). Where: ECS 5075 conference room *~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~* NOTE: This meeting has moved to 5075 (same floor, larger conference room). I'll have a sign on the door that points to the new room. The conference room is to your right from the elevators, before the glass door. This meeting will focus on how books are created in RisktRAC and associated with RisktRAC's flexible portfolio reporting system to gather Value at Risk, P&L, and Open Positions. Aspects of automatic portfolio/book creation will also be covered. Please call myself (x57534) or Stephanie McGinnis (39283) if you need more information, thanks.
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: Updated: RisktRAC: Managing Books and Portfolios
Q: Jeff, We have never met, but I have read and enjoyed your articles on Enron's bold business vision. Stan Marek, head of Marek Brothers, in Houston is a good friend of mine, and he suggested I call you directly, but I think an email may be more efficient. I am CTO and Senior VP of R&D for a software company called Hyprotech. We are second in the global market for process simulation technology, but I think first in innovation. One of Hyprotech's philosophies is to "model to the business boundary". This allows a business leader to have as clearer vision of the technical behavior of an asset to any depth and fidelity that is appropriate per the desired modeling investment. We do whole-asset models of refineries, chemical plants and power plants. Also, Hyprotech is the only company with the full technical capability of modeling the entire business asset for oil and gas operations from sand face to custody transfer (well-bore, riser, piping network, topside processing, transmission, separation, gas plant, compression, metering). As a result, Hyprotech has 80% of this market. Hyprotech is deeply into real-time online modeling for decision support and optimization. We have been discussing with gas storage industry the possibility of basing trading on a full dynamic model of the facility. The business motivator is that a full scope model coupled to an contract and business parameters allows for a better estimate of the sensitivities of a trade. I am a Enron stockholder and naturally thought that perhaps the same methodology can be applied as a real-time model-based data filter coupled to Enron's current decision support models for trading. The real-time model is a virtual facility (much as a flight simulator is a virtual airplane) and should increase understanding, open up new possibilities, reduce risk and increase agility in trades. My question is who at Enron the most appropriate person for discussing details and practicalities of this concept for your company? Thanks for your attention,
Propose a subject line
A: Real-time Online Modeling and Optimization of Dynamic Gas Network s for Trading
IN: Hi there, Thanks for taking my car in. I admit I feel like men get treated better by car servicing people than women. I'm not just saying that, either. On the issue of Charlotte, is it your idea that she will take care of Tuesdays only while you are going to rodeo meetings? I know in her email she had a preference for not doing the Sharon thing, and I do think we lost something when we (well, you) weren't communicating with Sharon or Amy in a regular basis. I know it is easy for me to say since it is an inconvenience for you... ckm

Generate a subject line.

OUT: Charlotte
IN: This is an email
Holden, Can you look at this deal, 602737.1. It's not comming through on the CARP report even after I schedule it and PNM is wondering why. Also, a purchase for $58 27 mw's isn't in the system and they are seeing it. I'm not sure how Parking and lending deals are entered in the system, but somthing looks out of wack thanks

What is the subject?

OUT: PNM Parking and lending
We have received an executed Novation Agreement dated as of October 26, 2001 wherein all of the current Bankers Trust Group financial trades shall be transferred and governed under the ISDA Master Agreement between Deutsche Bank AG and ENA dated effective as of December 29, 2000. The Master Agreement between Bankers Trust Group and ENA shall no longer be in effect. Global Counterparty: Please ensure that the ISDA Master Agreement referenced above is attached to this counterparty in EOL. Confirmation Desk: Please ensure that all EOL financial confirmations show this counterparty as "Deutsche Bank AG, acting through its New York Branch" Copies will be distributed.
Answer:
Duetsche Bank AG - Novation Agreement