Problem: Here is a premise:
Dave Hanson, your world was a world of rigid laws.

Here is a hypothesis:
Dave Hanson, how you survived in your world beats me.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Sentence 1: yeah no that was that that that was horrible it was and she she never even got to see her family that she came in to visit

Sentence 2: Her family was sad they never got to see her.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question:
In Newsweek , for example, Stuart Taylor Jr. spends an entire column proposing and defending a better question than the media have asked Bush so Would you seek long prison terms for today's 18-year-olds for doing what you say you may or may not have done as a young man--and when you now suggest that whatever you did was a mere youthful indiscretion, and thus irrelevant to your candidacy?

Does it follow that "News reporters are damming Bush based on his youthful criminal activities. "?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
no

Q: If However, if leave is used, a deviation of less than 1 hour could be considered material., can we say that "If no deviation is used it can be considered material"?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A: no

Premise:
"well you know what they say about the weather here in Texas"
Hypothesis: You've heard what people say about weather in Ohio.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

no

Sentence 1: This appears to be in the nature of the Web and not something that is likely to change.

Sentence 2: This will change soon because it's not inherent to the Web.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer:
no