Question: Sentence A: Our work has shown that agencies have benefited from their use of results-oriented performance agreements for political and senior career executives.

Sentence B: Agencies benefit from performance agreements.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Question: But later, Mr. T.
In the future, Mr. T.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Problem: Here is a premise:
The elegant (and today traffic-choked) Gran Va, Madrid's central shopping artery, is a turn-of-the century showcase of Art Nouveau and Art Deco styles.

Here is a hypothesis:
There is a lot of traffic in Gran Va

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes

Sentence 1: Now everyone go on out and tease a fat guy on me.

Sentence 2: Go in and hug a skinny gal.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: no

Question:
How do we know this?

Does it follow that "Have we confirmed that this is true?"?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
it is not possible to tell

Question:
Based on the premise "A person's basic humanity is not governed by how he or she came into this world, or whether somebody else happens to have the same DNA.", can we conclude that "The basic humanity of a person does not depend on how they came into this world, for example."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
yes