Here is an email: Hi, Think I forgot to tell you that Ken has a daughter, born almost two weeks ago, so your Grandparents tell me. Apparently Peg hasn't told Carolyn either .I've e-mailed her several times about the baby's arrival and she promised to let me know . Mom
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: forgot
Q: PR01: 174 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE 04/26/2001 GOVERNOR DAVIS SIGNS EXECUTIVE ORDERS TO PROVIDE POWER TO CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO Governor Gray Davis has signed three executive orders to increase stabilization, conservation and generation of power in California. Executive Order D-34-01 Many numerous and complicated statutes, regulations, policies and procedures are delaying deployment of the energy conservation funding outlined in SB 5X and AB 29X signed by the Governor two weeks ago. Executive Order D-34-01 will speed up implementation of the measures. Together, the two bills provide over $850 million for energy conservation and distributed generation programs designed to save over 2,000 megawatts this summer. With the Executive Order, the Energy Commission will not have to go through the cumbersome process of guideline adoption to approve funding. The programs in the demand reduction program that will be streamlined included: Public Agency Loans and Grants (ECAA); Time-Of-Use and Real-Time Meters; Municipal Program; and Cool Roofs/Building Materials Executive Order D-33-01 Governor Davis signed Executive Order D-33-01 to extend the conservation rebate of the "20/20" program to the customers in the territory serviced by the San Diego Gas and Electric Company. The program is designed to help the state avoid the likelihood of blackouts this summer and reward consumers who significantly conserve energy. In addition, it could save the state up to $1.3 billion in power costs by reducing the amount of electricity the state must buy during expensive summer peak periods. Executive Order D-32-01 In Executive Order D-32-01, Governor Davis orders the transfer of funds from the Energy Commission to the Department of Water Resources for implementation of the power plant construction incentive program. Incentives will include: $5,000 per megawatt (MW) of average electrical output on the first 100 MW and $2,500 per MW for each MW above 100 MW, if brought on-line by July 1, 2001; $4,000 per MW of average electrical output on the first 100 MW and $2,000 per MW for each MW above 100 MW, if brought on-line between July 2, 2001 and August 1, 2001; and $3,000 per MW of average electrical output on the first 100 MW and $1,500 per MW for each MW above 100 MW, if brought on-line between August 2, 2001 and August 31, 2001. Executive Order D-32-01 Executive Order D-33-01 Executive Order D-34-01
Propose a subject line
A: GOVERNOR DAVIS SIGNS EXECUTIVE ORDERS
IN: Drew, I wanted you to be aware of a potential dispute with regard to our consultant, Mark Baldwin of IGS. Our consulting agreement with IGS (which has now terminated) provided for a flat fee, plus an incentive fee calculated using the net present value of any contract "identified by IGS" and entered into during the term of the consulting agreement. During the term of the agreement, TW entered into its Gallup Expansion agreement with Southern. IGS is now claiming it brought in the deal and so is entitled to an incentive fee. While it is undisputed that Mark discussed the deal with Southern, Southern was also on Lorraine's list of shippers to contact for Gallup Expansion capacity. Also, the capacity was posted for all to see. So, while Mark can certainly claim he "identified" the deal, he was not alone in doing so. Steve is going to call Mark in response to his letter (after he talks to Lorraine to verify facts). Our thinking is that if we offer IGS some money they will be happy. We would really like to preserve what has been a good working relationship with this consultant. On the other hand, I think we could probably take the position that they are not entitled to any incentive fee. However, since the contract is silent as to whether IGS has to be the only party bringing in the deal in order to qualify for the incentive fee, this position is not as strong as I'd like it to be, and IGS might sue TW. The amount in dispute could be as much as $200,000, depending on what rate we use in calculating net present value. If you have any problem with our offering to pay part of the incentive fee to IGS, let me know. I think it will be very important for Steve not to admit that Mark helped in any way in getting the deal -- just in case they do

Generate a subject line.

OUT: contract issue
IN: This is an email
FYI, The next Outage Coordination Commercial Review meeting is 11/14/01. The purpose for the meeting is to discuss outages that have a flow impact for the month of December. Please review the attached outage report. If you have any questions, please give me a call.

What is the subject?

OUT: Outage Commericial Review Meeting (NNG,TW, & NBPL)
QUESTION: Gary Hickerson has authorized the addition of Deutsche Bank for Futures Trading. We have been using Carr Futures in the European Market but Carr Futures no longer has the presence and coverage needed; whereas, Deutsche Bank can fulfill our trading needs at competitive clearing rates. I will forward the account opening documentation to Legal when received. Sheila
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: New Futures Broker Request - Deutsche Bank
IN: Announcement for E283-1: Real Estate Finance: Those of you who were present yesterday during the class should already have them. I have some left over copies of the 2 next sets of lecture notes (Commercial Mortgages and REITS) and a copy of the next case. If you did not make it to the class yesterday you can pick up your copy of everything at the door of my office (F625). You will also notice the spreadsheet in the handouts section. There can be various ways to tackle cases. This spreadsheet parallels what Dennis and Co. did. Regards,

Generate a subject line.

OUT:
Lecture Notes