Sentence 1: Mrs. Vandemeyer and the Russian seemed to be at variance over some matter, and finally the latter exclaimed bitterly: "With your persistent recklessness, you will end by ruining us!"

Sentence 2: Mrs. Vandemeyer disagreed with the way the Russian was handling the flower shop.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question:
Well, there has been an excruciatingly technical argument about this, mysteriously known as the double dividend debate; the general consensus seems to be no, and that on balance pollution taxes would be more likely to reduce GDP slightly than to increase it.

Does it follow that " Pollution taxes would probably reduce GDP by at least 5%."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
it is not possible to tell

Q: If yeah well my my point of view to that is is that it would have had so much i mean the attack would have been so complete on Iraq if they had i mean the first you can imagine the first uh chemical weapon used, can we say that "It would have devastated Iraq if they had used chemical weapons."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A: yes

Premise:
"The gateway, created at the height of Malla development in 1753, surpasses anything of its kind in the valley."
Hypothesis: The gateway in Malla was built in 1735.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

no

input question: Ca'daan's heart jumped again and he bowed his head low. If this premise is true, does that tell us:"Ca'daan bowed his head because the king rode by."?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: it is not possible to tell

Q: If This is all very distressing., can we say that "It's all very nerve wracking."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A:
yes