input question: Cete Fleurie If this premise is true, does that tell us:"Cete Fleurie"?

OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

output answer: yes

Question:
Based on the premise "We have adjusted mail processing costs for La Poste and Posti Finland.", can we conclude that "We did not adjust the mail processing costs for Posti Finland."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
no

Question: Sentence A: Bruce Zucker chooses to provide pro bono legal aid to poor tenants over more prestigious work, and it has become his life's passion.

Sentence B: Bruce Zucker provides free legal aid to the poor in Detroit.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Question: yeah well we wouldn't have to worry about that
You should be worrying about that.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Problem: Here is a premise:
The conclusion, then, is influenced strongly by whether the workshare category is more elastic.

Here is a hypothesis:
The workshare category elasticity has no impact on the conclusion.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no

Question:
It's silly that this is all such a guessing game.

Does it follow that "The guessing game can also be known as: Christmas shopping. "?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
it is not possible to tell