IN: Please provide me an update on the progress of the working group you have led this year. There are several things I would like you to cover in this regard. Did the working group function through the year or was it terminated (I recognize there may be good reasons for the latter, but would like to understand those reasons). What did the group accomplish? Would you recommend continuing it? Any changes? Are there other topics we should consider for working groups in the future? Any changes to the working group process itself? Please provide input on the individuals you worked with. You should be able to do this through the PEP system. If you cannot, please provide the feedback by confidential e-mail to me. Because the PRC is coming up soon, please provide the feedback by December 1.

Generate a subject line.

OUT: WORKING GROUP PROGRESS

IN: I believe that the Crestar deal is almost finalized. According to my records, Transaction Number NV8176/370753 was partially documeted with a GTC confirm (2000-087crfm.doc attached) dated January 4, 2001. This covers a firm sale of 21,100 MMBtu by Crestar to ENA for the period November 1, 2000 through October 31, 2001. The remainder of Transaction Number NV8176/370753 has been documented with two GTC confirms (2001-023crfm.doc and 2001-023acrfm.doc also attached) dated March 22, 2001 (Revised). 2001-023crfm covers the firm sale of 0 - 8,260 MMBtu per day for the period November 1, 2000 through October 31, 2001 and 2001-023acrfm covers the firm sale of 0 -11,740 MMBtu per day, also for the period November 1, 2000 through October 31, 2001. By assignment agreement (Crestar assignment.doc attached) dated effective as of April 1, 2001, Crestar assigned 2001-023acrfm to BP Canada Energy Marketing Corp.

Generate a subject line.

OUT: Crestar documents and partial assignment to BP

IN: In the spirit of the holiday season, SDG&E has come over from the dark side and now supports the assignability of direct access contracts! The utility also supports the ability of existing direct access customers to indefinitely remain on direct access after their contracts expire with one ESP, permitting them either to renew with their existing supplier or sign a new contract with another ESP. In the attached filing, the utility argues that this is reasonable and fair to direct access customers, particularly in view of the Enron bankruptcy. This will be an excellent development to reference in the comments that are due on January 4th in the DA suspension proceeding. Happy Holidays to each of you and your families! Dan

Generate a subject line.

OUT: EXCELLENT NEWS!

IN: Remember as those Ameren Energy Inc., as agent, etc. for various companies we got ETA amendments in for. They are coming thru tonight as as online counterparty but want to start trading today. Any problems?

Generate a subject line.

OUT:
rush approval