Problem: Here is a premise:
that's right that's right from uh uh Detroit that's right that's who that was yeah because i don't think they got anything from Perkins i think he was a free agent or uh

Here is a hypothesis:
Perkins was of great help to Detroit.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell

Sentence 1: that's true um-hum also probably look at packaging and that sort of thing we don't we don't need three quarters of what we get

Sentence 2: We need every single thing that we get.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: no

Question:
Therefore, by the laws of rational magic, it is _you_ to whom nothing is impossible.

Does it follow that "The laws of magic state it is impossible."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Answer:
no

Q: If Its sensual, feminine sculptures show significant Tantric Hindu influence., can we say that "The sculptures were strong, sharp and masculine."?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

A: no

Premise:
"oh my well our weather's suddenly turned cold again uh our weather is so unstable you never know"
Hypothesis: our weather is cold again but yesterday it was hot
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

it is not possible to tell

Sentence 1: However, it is not a net inflow of resources to the entity, because the asset received (cash) is offset by an equal liability (debt).

Sentence 2: It is purely a net inflow of resources to the entity.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer:
no