TASK DEFINITION: In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.
PROBLEM: Comment: Heck, at this point it's worth a shot!

SOLUTION: Non-sexual-explicit

PROBLEM: Comment: It's equally ludicrous my friend. I intended say there is more than one behavior that causes addiction and prescription drugs are every bit as likely to destroy families. The city wants to chose their 'bad' behavior to tax. It's not a fair tax it's a sin tax. I ask again why chose marijuana users?

SOLUTION: Non-sexual-explicit

PROBLEM: Comment: You are such a negative jerk, Kizla. Millsap is universally rated as one of the top 6 or so free agents, including such names as Durant and Curry. But in your negative world, the Nuggets are simply trying to save face by signing one of the premier players on the market, a player that happens to fit one of their key needs. On 6/24, you wrote another critical (as always) column, "Why should Chris Paul and Paul Millsap take the Nuggets seriously as a free agent destination?" Now one of them apparently is doing exactly that, and of course you, Mr. Kizla, turn that into a negative as well. Whatever, Kizla. You are just a hater.

SOLUTION:
Non-sexual-explicit